alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.D., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

U.S. COAST GUARD, Washington, DC, 

Employer 

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0476

Issued: May 7, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On February 8, 2021 appellant through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a January 11, 

2021 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of 

the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0476.

In a letter dated and received March 19, 2021, counsel requested that the appeal be 

dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-0476 is dismissed.

Issued: May 7, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5152 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

Battlefield Park to include the Wallis House and 

Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5152 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain 

3 National Battlefield Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 

4 2010’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 The Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

8 Park was authorized as a unit of the National Park 

9 System on June 26, 1935. Prior to 1935, parts of 

10 the park had been acquired and protected by Civil 

11 War veterans and the War Department. 

12 (2) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

13 Park protects Kennesaw Mountain and Kolb’s 

14 Farm, which are battle sites along the route of Gen15 eral Sherman’s 1864 campaign to take Atlanta. 

16 (3) Most of the park protects Confederate posi17 tions and strategy. The Wallis House is one of the 

18 few original structures remaining from the Battle of 

19 Kennesaw Mountain associated with Union positions 

20 and strategy. 

21 (4) The Wallis House is strategically located 

22 next to a Union signal station at Harriston Hill. 

23 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT; LAND ACQUISITION; AD24 MINISTRATION. 

25 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the 

26 Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park is modified 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5152 RFS

1 to include the approximately 8 acres identified as ‘‘Wallis 

2 House and Harriston Hill’’, and generally depicted on the 

3 map titled ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

4 Park, Proposed Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 325/ 

5 80,020, and dated February 2010. 

6 (b) MAP.—The map referred to in subsection (a) 

7 shall be on file and available for inspection in the appro8 priate offices of the National Park Service. 

9 (c) LAND ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Inte10 rior is authorized to acquire, from willing owners only, 

11 land or interests in land described in subsection (a) by 

12 donation or exchange. 

13 (d) ADMINISTRATION OF ACQUIRED LANDS.—The 

14 Secretary of the Interior shall administer land and inter15 ests in land acquired under this section as part of the Ken16 nesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park in accordance 

17 with applicable laws and regulations. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7320

RASTAMAN MTUME OBALAJI MFUME I,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NANCY HARRISON; LARRY C. BATSON; WILLIAM R.

DAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-1969-0-20BD)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul

Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mfume I v.

Harrison, No. CA-94-1969-0-20BD (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994; Aug. 3,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert J. Finch, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
               presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
               results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
               covered by the Report.





Date:  August 11, 2006                        By:  /s/ Albert J. Finch
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Albert J. Finch,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40460

Summary Calendar

 

MIGUEL AREVALO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(L-94-CV-150)

_________________________________________________________________

January 8, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Arevalo, #439356, appeals the district court's denial

of his habeas corpus petition, arguing that the evidence supporting

his conviction for aggravated kidnapping was insufficient. Viewing

the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any

rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt

the facts necessary to support a finding that Arevalo did not

voluntarily release the victim of the offense alive and in a safe

place. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Rupert Galliers-Pratt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, tomy best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)               the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2)               the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  RUPERT GALLIERS-PRATT |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Rupert  Galliers-Pratt     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

 

Dated:May 17, 2005

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and will be retained by VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Appalachian States Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission

# Time and Date:

 10 a.m.-12:30 p.m. November 4, 2005. 

# Place:

 Harrisburg Hilton and Towers, One North Second Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101. 

# Status:

 Most of the meeting will be open to the public. If there is a need for an executive session (closed to the public), it will be announced at the meeting. 

# Matters to be Considered:

*Portions Open to the Public*: The primary purpose of this meeting is to (1) review the independent auditors' report of Commission's financial statements for fiscal year 2004-2005; (2) review the Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) generation information for 2004; (3) consider a proposal budget for fiscal year 2006-2007; (4) review recent national developments regarding LLRW management and disposal; (5) discuss the need for a survey of LLRW generators in the Compact; and (6) elect the Commission's Officers.                     

# Portions Closed to the Public:

 Executive Session, if deemed necessary, will be announced at the meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Richard R. Janati, Pennsylvania Staff member on the Commission, at 717-787-2163. 

Richard R. Janati,

PA Staff Member on the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-21242 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 0000-00-P
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GEORGE WASHINGTON SUGGS

No. 758SC27

(Filed 7 May 1975)

On *certiorari*to review the judgment of *Cohoon, Judge.*Judgment entered 22 March 1971 in Superior Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 March 1975.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Associate Attorney Sandra M. King for the State.*

*Turner and Harrison by Fred W. Harrison for defendant appellant.*

*682MORRIS, VAUGHN and CLARK, Judges.

No error.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.W., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL 

CENTER, San Diego, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-1150 & 

19-1109

Issued: March 1, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 20-1150

AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

IN DOCKET NO. 19-1109

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On April 30, 2020 appellant sought appeal from a purported April 17, 2020 decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 20-1150.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed his appeal.2 As of the filing of the current appeal, the most recent OWCP decision 

was dated February 15, 2019. However, by a January 2, 2020 decision in Docket No. 19-1109, 

the Board set aside OWCP’s February 15, 2019 decision, finding that OWCP should further 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(e).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

develop the medical evidence pertaining to appellant’s schedule award claim.

3

 As there is no final 

adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of this appeal over which the Board 

may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 20-1150

must be dismissed.

To the extent that appellant’s appeal may be construed as a timely petition for 

reconsideration of the Board’s decision in Docket No. 19-1109, the Board notes that its decision 

became final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of issuance.4 As appellant did not file 

his disagreement with the Board’s decision until April 30, 2020, this submission may not be 

deemed as a timely petition for reconsideration as it was filed in excess of 30 days from the date 

of issuance.5 Thus, the petition for reconsideration of the Board decision must be dismissed as 

untimely filed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 20-1150 is dismissed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the petition for reconsideration in Docket No. 

19-1109 is dismissed as untimely filed.

Issued: March 1, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3 Docket No. 19-1109 (issued January 2, 2020). 

4 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).

5 See id. at § 501.7(a).
$  13,000.00

08/02/01

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

     As  hereinafter agreed Vibrant Health International, promises to pay to the
order  of  USA  Ventures,  8907  E.  Chenango Ave., Greenwood Village, CO 80111,
thirteen  thousand  dollars  ($13,000.00).  And  it  is  hereby agreed that said
$13,000.00  shall  be  paid  at  any time the Company's completes an offering of
stock  or  a period of time six months after the date of this Note, whichever is
earlier.  Interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum will be charged on
the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.

     Should default be made in the payment of the Promissory Note then the whole
unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default
is  made  and  said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or
suit  is  bought  on  the same, then the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and
attorneys'  fees  that might be incurred. If there is a lawsuit, borrower agrees
upon  lender's  request to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State
of Colorado. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws  of  the  State  of  Colorado.



                                   ________________________________
                                           Thomas  H.  McAdam
                                     Vibrant  Health  International


<PAGE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5329 

To modify the project for navigation and environmental restoration, HoustonGalveston Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2010 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To modify the project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, 

authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 

1996, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHAN4 NELS, TEXAS. 

5 The project for navigation and environmental restora6 tion, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, au7 thorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources De8 velopment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), is modified to 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5329 IH

1 authorize the Secretary to extend the boundaries of the 

2 Galveston channel approximately 2600 feet beyond Pier 

3 38, if the Secretary determines that the extension is fea4 sible. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.46

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

AMOUNT: $200,000.00                                    DATE: November 3, 2000

Twenty six days after date of receipt, for value received, the undersigned
(jointly and severally if more than one) promise(s) to pay to the order of:

                              AccuRec LLC.
                              Tax I.D.

The sum of Two Hundred Thousand dollars plus an interest equal to (8% annually)
           ----------------------------
payable at any place the holder may so designate. Interest to be paid at loan
pay off time.

The undersigned and any endorser or guarantors herefore, jointly and severally,
hereby agree that upon default in payment of performance of this note, or the
death, or any act of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of any of them,
however expressed or indicated, then this note shall, at the option of the
holder, become immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest
or further attorney and/or agent of the holder, and the undersigned, and any
endorser or guarantors, jointly and severally, agree to pay all collection
costs, expenses, agent's fees, and reasonable attorney's fees.

The undersigned further states if he should default on said loan, the lender
shall be authorized to place a lien on the following collateral:

                     1. All properties of Color Image, Inc


Borrowers Signature:                              Address:

/s/ Sueling Wang                                  4350 Peachtree Ind. Blvd. #100
-----------------------------------------         Norcross, GA 30071
Sueling Wang, President Color Image, Inc.


/s/ Morris E. Van Asperen
-----------------------------------------
Witness


/s/ Ann Shieh
-----------------------------------------
Witness
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.M., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. 

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Las Cruces, NM,

Employer 

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0309

Issued: June 25, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On December 29, 2020 appellant through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a

December 10, 2020 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0309.

In a letter dated and received June 1, 2021, counsel requested that the appeal be dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-0309 is dismissed.

Issued: June 25, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23.3



To the Board of Directors
Bull Run Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-91296, 33-91298 and 333-56125) on Form S-8 of Bull Run Corporation of
our report dated February 10, 1997 with respect to the statements of earnings,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Capital Sports Properties,
Inc. for the six-months ended June 30, 1996, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Bull Run Corporation.



                                            /s/  KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 26, 1999