62014 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices 

reasonable, feasible, and flexible. 

Proposals should clearly demonstrate 

how the organization will meet the 

program’s objectives and plan. 

4. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed 

programs should describe the impact 

that workshop participants will have on 

others, both in their U.S. host 

communities and in Eurasia after they 

return home. There should be a specific 

plan for providing students with tools 

they can take back to their Eurasian 

home countries to implement concepts 

and ideas they have gained from the 

workshop. Proposals also should 

explain how students will be prepared 

to transition back to their host 

communities. 

5. Support of Diversity: Proposals 

should demonstrate substantive support 

of the Bureau’s policy on diversity. 

Achievable and relevant features should 

be cited in both program administration 

(selection of participants, program 

venue and program evaluation) and 

program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource 

materials and follow-up activities). 

6. Institutional Capacity: Proposed 

personnel and organizational resources 

should be adequate and appropriate to 

achieve the program or project’s goals. 

7. Institution’s Record/Ability: 

Proposals should demonstrate an 

institutional record of successful 

exchange programs, including 

responsible fiscal management and full 

compliance with all reporting 

requirements for past Bureau grants as 

determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The 

Bureau will consider the past 

performance of prior recipients and the 

demonstrated potential of new 

applicants. 

8. Project Evaluation: Proposals 

should include a plan to evaluate the 

activity’s success, both as the activities 

unfold and at the end of the program. A 

draft survey questionnaire or other 

technique plus description of a 

methodology to use to link outcomes to 

original project objectives is 

recommended. 

9. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: 

The overhead and administrative 

components of the proposal, including 

salaries and honoraria, should be kept 

as low as possible. All other items 

should be necessary and appropriate. 

Proposals should maximize cost-sharing 

through other private sector support as 

well as institutional direct funding 

contributions. 

VI. Award Administration Information 

VI.1. Award Notices: Final awards 

cannot be made until funds have been 

appropriated by Congress, allocated and 

committed through internal Bureau 

procedures. Successful applicants will 

receive an Assistance Award Document 

(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office. 

The AAD and the original grant 

proposal with subsequent modifications 

(if applicable) shall be the only binding 

authorizing document between the 

recipient and the U.S. Government. The 

AAD will be signed by an authorized 

Grants Officer, and mailed to the 

recipient’s responsible officer identified 

in the application. Unsuccessful 

applicants will receive notification of 

the results of the application review 

from the ECA program office 

coordinating this competition. 

VI.2 Administrative and National 

Policy Requirements: Terms and 

Conditions for the Administration of 

ECA agreements include the following: 

Office of Management and Budget 

Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for 

Nonprofit Organizations.’’

Office of Management and Budget 

Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for 

Educational Institutions.’’

OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles 

for State, Local and Indian 

Governments.’’

OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised), 

Uniform Administrative Requirements 

for Grants and Agreements with 

Institutions of Higher Education, 

Hospitals, and other Nonprofit 

Organizations. 

OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform 

Administrative Requirements for 

Grants-in-Aid to State and Local 

Governments. 

OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of 

States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations. 

Please reference the following Web 

sites for additional information: http:// 

www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; 

http://exchanges.state.gov/education/ 

grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI. 

VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You 

must provide ECA with a hard copy 

original plus two copies of the following 

report: A final program and financial 

report no more than 90 days after the 

expiration of the award. 

As indicated above, the grantee will 

be required to provide reports analyzing 

its evaluation findings to the Bureau in 

its regular program report. (Please refer 

to IV. Application and Submission 

Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program 

Monitoring and Evaluation 

information). 

All data collected, including survey 

responses and contact information, must 

be maintained for a minimum of three 

years and provided to the Bureau upon 

request. 

All reports must be sent to the ECA 

Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer 

listed in the final assistance award 

document. 

VII. Agency Contacts 

For questions about this 

announcement, contact: Diana Aronson, 

Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth 

Programs Division, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 

568, ECA/PE/C/PY–06–02, U.S. 

Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, 

phone—(202) 203–7501, fax—(202) 

203–7529, AronsonDS@state.gov. All 

correspondence with the Bureau 

concerning this RFGP should reference 

the above title and number ECA/PE/C/ 

PY–06–02. 

Please read the complete Federal 

Register announcement before sending 

inquiries or submitting proposals. Once 

the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau 

staff may not discuss this competition 

with applicants until the proposal 

review process has been completed. 

VIII. Other Information 

Notice 

The terms and conditions published 

in this RFGP are binding and may not 

be modified by any Bureau 

representative. Explanatory information 

provided by the Bureau that contradicts 

published language will not be binding. 

Issuance of the RFGP does not 

constitute an award commitment on the 

part of the Government. The Bureau 

reserves the right to reduce, revise, or 

increase proposal budgets in accordance 

with the needs of the program and the 

availability of funds. Awards made will 

be subject to periodic reporting and 

evaluation requirements per section VI.3 

above. 

Dated: October 19, 2005. 

Dina Habib Powell, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and 

Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05–21471 Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements 

Filed the Week Ending September 30, 

2005 

The following Agreements were filed 

with the Department of Transportation 

under the Sections 412 and 414 of the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 

U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures 

governing proceedings to enforce these 

provisions. Answers may be filed within 

21 days after the filing of the 

application. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22568. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices 62015 

Date Filed: September 26, 2005. 

Parties: Members of the International 

Air Transport Association. 

Subject: TC1 Passenger Tariff 

Coordinating Conference 

Teleconference, 25–27 July 2005; TC1 

Within South America Resolutions 

(PTC1 0331); TC1 Passenger Tariff 

Coordinating Conference 

Teleconference, 25–27 July 2005; TC1 

Longhaul between USA and Chile, 

Panama Resolutions (PTC1 0334); 

Minutes: TC1 Teleconference, 25–27 

July 2005 (Memo PTC1 338); Tables: 

TC1 Within South America specified 

fare table (Memo PTC1 0102); Technical 

Correction: TC1 Passenger Tariff 

Coordinating Conference 

Teleconference, 25–27 July 2005; TC1 

Longhaul between USA and Chile, 

Panama (PTC0337); Intended effective 

date: 1 January 2006. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22595. 

Date Filed: September 28, 2005. 

Parties: Members of the International 

Air Transport Association. 

Subject: TC23/123 Europe—Japan/ 

Korea Expedited Resolution 002af 

(Memo 0130); rl; Intended effective date: 

1 December 2005. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22598. 

Date Filed: September 28, 2005. 

Parties: Members of the International 

Air Transport Association. 

Subject: TC23/TC123 Africa-TC3 

Geneva & Teleconference, 12–14 

September 2005; Intended effective 

date: 1 November 2005. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22599. 

Date Filed: September 28, 2005. 

Parties: Members of the International 

Air Transport Association. 

Subject: TC23/TC123 Middle EastSouth Asian Subcontinent expedited 

reso 002am; Geneva & Teleconference, 

12–14 September 2005 (Memo 0240); 

TC23/TC123 Middle East-South West 

Pacific Expedited reso 002ai; Geneva & 

Teleconference, 12–14 September 2005 

(Memo 0241); TC23/TC123 Middle EastJapan, Korea Reso 002an; Geneva & 

Teleconference, 12–14 September 2005 

(Memo 0242); Intended effective date: 1 

November 2005. 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 05–21453 Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

Notice of Applications for Certificates 

of Public Convenience and Necessity 

and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed 

Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q) 

During the Week Ending September 30, 

2005 

The following Applications for 

Certificates of Public Convenience and 

Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier 

Permits were filed under Subpart B 

(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department 

of Transportation’s Procedural 

Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et 

seq.). The due date for Answers, 

Conforming Applications, or Motions to 

Modify Scope are set forth below for 

each application. Following the Answer 

period DOT may process the application 

by expedited procedures. Such 

procedures may consist of the adoption 

of a show-cause order, a tentative order, 

or in appropriate cases a final order 

without further proceedings. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22228, 

OST–2005–22577. 

Date Filed: September 26, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 17, 2005. 

Description: Application of PSA 

Airlines, Inc. (‘‘PSA’’), in response to 

the Department’s Notice served August 

26, 2005, PSA requests parallel 

certificate authority for its existing 

exemptions to provide scheduled 

foreign air transportation of persons, 

property and mail, as well as for such 

authority for Open Skies markets in the 

Caribbean region for which it has not 

previously sought or obtained any 

authority. PSA further seeks integration 

authority to combine this authority with 

their other authorities. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22228, 

OST–2005–22576. 

Date Filed: September 26, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 17, 2005. 

Description: Application of JetBlue 

Airways Corporation (‘‘JetBlue’’), 

requesting a certificate of public 

convenience and necessity to engage in 

foreign scheduled air transportation of 

persons, property and mail to Cancun, 

Mexico from New York, NY, including 

integration authority with its other and 

future certificate authority held by 

JetBlue as provided in the August 23 

Notice issued in OST–2005–22228. 

Docket Number: OST–2005–22228, 

OST–2005–22578. 

Date Filed: September 26, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 17, 2005. 

Description: Application of US 

Airways, Inc. (‘‘US Airways’’) in 

response to the Department’s Notice 

served August 26, 2005, US Airways 

requests parallel certificate authority for 

its pending and existing exemptions to 

provide scheduled foreign air 

transportation of persons, property and 

mail, as well as authority for Open Skies 

markets for which US Airways has not 

previously sought or obtained any 

authority. US Airways further seeks 

integration authority to combine this 

authority with their other authorities. 

Docket Number: OST–2004–18481. 

Date Filed: September 27, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 18, 2005. 

Description: Amendment no. 1 of 

Domodedovo Airlines amending its 

application for a foreign air carrier 

permit to operate scheduled passenger 

and combination scheduled flights 

between Moscow-Domodedovo Airport, 

Russia (DME), and Miami, FL (MIA), 

commencing on or about April 1, 2006. 

Docket Number: OST–1999–6323. 

Date Filed: September 29, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 20, 2005. 

Description: Application of United 

Parcel Service Co., requesting renewal 

and amendment of its certificate of 

public convenience and necessity for 

Route 797, authorizing UPS to provide 

foreign air transportation of property 

and mail with full traffic rights between 

any point or points in the United States, 

via any intermediate points to any point 

or points in China, and beyond to any 

points outside China, with full traffic 

rights between all points on the route. 

UPS further requests such further and 

different relief as the Department may 

deem just and necessary. 

Docket Number: OST–2001–9027. 

Date Filed: September 30, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 17, 2005. 

Description: Application of American 

Airlines, Inc., requesting renewal of the 

following authority in its certificate of 

public convenience and necessity for 

Route 147 authorizing scheduled foreign 

air transportation of persons, property, 

and mail. 

Docket Number: OST–2001–9027. 

Date Filed: September 26, 2005. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: October 21, 2005. 

Description: Application of American 

Airlines, Inc., requesting renewal of its