alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,374
<SECURITIES>                                   101,711
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,685
<PP&E>                                       1,550,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,537,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          550,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       911,918
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,645)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,537,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,452
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  550,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (515,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (515,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - 33 CFR Part 151
          - [USCG-2004-19621]
          - RIN 1625-AA89

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of inquiry; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 27, 2004, requesting information about the current status of dry cargo operations on the Great Lakes. The document contained an incorrect                         **ACTION**                         caption.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lieutenant Commander Mary Sohlberg, U.S. Coast Guard, Environmental Standards Division, telephone: (202) 267-0713, e-mail:                         *msohlberg@comdt.uscg.mil.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 27, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-28227, (69 FR 77147), correct the                         **ACTION**                         caption to read:                    

# ACTION:

Notice of inquiry.

Dated: December 30, 2004.

David L. Nichols,

CDR, USCG Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, Acting.

[FR Doc. 05-215 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### NEVADA DESERT INN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, *v.*STANLEY BURKE, et al., Respondents.

No. 3502

October 29, 1947.

185 P.2d 1005.

No appearance for Appellant.

*Jones, Wiener & Jones,*of Las Vegas, for Respondents.

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Respondents have moved to dismiss appellant’s appeal herein on the ground that appellant has not filed a bill of *505exceptions, judgment roll, transcript, or other record on appeal. The motion was argued and briefed by respondents, but no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant. Counsel representing appellant in the trial court, and who had filed the notice of appeal on behalf of appellant, addressed a letter to the clerk of this court advising that the setting of the hearing of the motion was satisfactory and that they would not appear to resist the motion.

The record shows that on July 29, 1946, the district court made an order granting the motion of the respondents for a nonsuit. On September 28, 1946, appellants served and filed notice of intention to move for a new trial, and on December 13, 1946, an order was made denying said motion. Notice of the order denying the motion for new trial was served and filed February 19, 1947. On February 10, 1947, notice of appeal was served and filed. The record discloses no bond on the appeal and no waiver of such bond, but respondents have not made the absence of the bond one of the grounds of their motion to dismiss. Thereafter sundry orders were made extending appellant’s time to serve and file its bill of exceptions to the following respective dates: April 1, 1947, April 15, 1947, May 1, 1947, May 15, 1947, May 25, 1947, and June 15, 1947. No bill of exceptions, judgment roll, transcript, or other record on appeal has been served or filed.

The applicable provision of N.C.L. sec. 9385.81 requires serving and filing of a bill of exceptions within 20 days after service of written notice of the decision on the motion for new trial. Section 9385.86 provides that if a party shall omit or fail to serve and file his bill of exceptions within the time limited, he shall be deemed to have waived his right thereto. Rule II of the rules of the supreme court reads: “The transcript of the record on appeal shall be filed within thirty days after the appeal has been perfected, and the bill of exceptions, if there be one, has been settled.” Rule III provides *506that if the transcript of the record be not so filed “the appeal, after five days’ notice in writing to the appellant, specifically stating the grounds thereof, may be dismissed on motion of the respondent.”

There is nothing before the court upon which the appeal may be predicated, and appellant has made no attempt to comply with the statutes or rules of court. It is clear that the motion must be granted. Sullivan v. Nevada Industrial Commission, 54 Nev. 301,14 P.2d 262.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5104 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for the deduction 

for domestic oil related production activities of companies which are 

not major integrated oil companies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2010 

Mr. POMEROY (for himself and Mr. NUNES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for 

the deduction for domestic oil related production activities of companies which are not major integrated oil 

companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR DOMESTIC OIL RELATED PRO4 DUCTION ACTIVITIES ALLOWED FOR COMPA5 NIES WHICH ARE NOT MAJOR INTEGRATED 

6 OIL COMPANIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 199(d)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:41 Apr 22, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5104.IH H5104

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5104 IH

1 ed by striking ‘‘has oil related qualified production activi2 ties income’’ and inserting ‘‘is a major integrated oil com3 pany (as defined in section 167(h)(5)(B))’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (9) of 

5 section 199(d) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘TAX6 PAYERS WITH OIL RELATED QUALIFIED PRODUCTION AC7 TIVITIES INCOME’’ and inserting ‘‘MAJOR INTEGRATED OIL

8 COMPANIES’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form
S-8 No. 333-93655 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan; Fourth Amended
and Restated Employees Stock Option Plan; Form S-8 No. 333-03783 pertaining to
the Nonemployee-Directors' Equity Compensation Plan; and Form S-8 Nos. 33-88020
and 33-22545 pertaining to the Employees Stock Option Plan of The Ackerley
Group, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2001 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Ackerley Group, Inc. included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 26, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4825 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4825

    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
     and used for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2010

 Mrs. Kirkpatrick of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
     and used for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL 
              ALLOWANCES TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO REDUCE 
              THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for Members' Representational Allowances for the 
House of Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 
payments are made under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited 
in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that in the case 
of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal budget deficit, such 
amounts shall be used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as the 
Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
#### William AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D01-2854.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 2, 2003.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 2003.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Anne C. Toolan, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

HAWKES, J.

During cross-examination of the arresting officer, Appellant attempted to elicit testimony as to the contents of his statement at the scene of his arrest. According to the proffered testimony, Appellant told the arresting officer the currency in his possession came from a paycheck he had cashed earlier that day. The trial court excluded the statement after the State objected, arguing it was self-serving hearsay. We affirm.

Appellant concedes the statement was self-serving hearsay and that the rule of completeness does not apply. *See Cotton v. State,*763 So.2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding rule of completeness, also referred to as doctrine of curative admissibility, entitles defendant to admit exculpatory portions of his statement when a state witness has testified about incriminating remarks contemporaneously made by the defendant). However, he argues that suppressing the statement violated due process because the court then instructed the jury that it could infer guilt from the unexplained possession of recently stolen property when, in fact, there was an explanation. We need not reach the merits of Appellant’s argument because the suppressed statement did not attempt to explain possession of the victim’s recently stolen currency. Instead, it was a statement that the currency found in his possession was not the currency that was recently stolen. The victim’s purse was stolen just minutes before Appellant gave his statement to the arresting officer. Thus, if the currency found in Appellant’s possession was the same as the currency stolen from the victim just minutes before, Appellant could not have obtained it earlier that day when he cashed his paycheck. *377Because the statement was a denial that the currency was stolen, it could not be offered to explain why Appellant possessed recently stolen currency.

Appellant also argues that, in any case in which the unexplained possession of recently stolen property jury instruction is given, it constitutes an impermissible comment on the evidence. We decline to address this issue because it was not preserved, and it does not constitute fundamental error. *See Currington v. State,*711 So.2d 218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); *see also Wright v. State,*789 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), *review denied,*816 So.2d 131 (Fla.2002).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mission Resources Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-63562, 333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707, 333-91326 and 333-111955) on Form
S-8 of Mission Resources Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mission Resources Corporation
(formerly Bellwether Exploration Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in
the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Mission Resources
Corporation.

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations." As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142,
"Goodwill and other Intangible Assets." As discussed in note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2001, the Company
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Instruments."



KPMG LLP


Houston, Texas
February 27, 2004
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32001R1526

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1526/2001 of 26 July 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 388/92 laying down detailed rules for implementation of the specific arrangements for the supply of cereal products to the French overseas departments (FOD) and establishing the forecast supply balance***Official Journal L 202 , 27/07/2001 P. 0006 - 0007*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1526/2001

of 26 July 2001

amending Regulation (EEC) No 388/92 laying down detailed rules for implementation of the specific arrangements for the supply of cereal products to the French overseas departments (FOD) and establishing the forecast supply balance

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3763/91 of 16 December 1991 introducing specific measures in respect of certain agricultural products for the benefit of the French overseas departments(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1448/2001(2), and in particular Article 2(6) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The quantities of products eligible for the specific supply arrangements are determined by means of periodic forecast balances which may be revised according to the essential requirements of the market taking into account local production and traditional trade flows.

(2) Pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3763/91, the forecast supply balance of cereal products to the FOD for 2001 was established by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 388/92(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 110/2001(4). In order to meet the needs of this region, amendments must be made to this forecast supply balance. Subsequently, Regulation (EEC) No 388/92 should be amended.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 388/92 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 356, 24.12.1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 198, 21.7.2001, p. 3.

(3) OJ L 43, 19.2.1992, p. 16.

(4) OJ L 19, 20.1.2001, p. 9.

ANNEX

"ANNEX

Cereals supply balance for the French overseas departments (2001)

>TABLE>"
Exhibit 10.35

   Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted
                    and filed separately with the Commission



                                               Alcoa Extruded
                                               Construction Products

                                               Tifton Aluminum Company, Inc.
                                               250 Southwest Boulevard
                                               P O Box 88
                                               Tifton GA 31793-0088 USA
                                               Tel: 1-229-382-7330
                                               Fax: 1-229-386-6707

March 4, 2002




Mr. Gary Ihrke
V.P Operations
Featherlite Trailers
P O Box 320
Cresco, IA 52136


Dear Gary:

This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement finalized today. ALCOA
has purchased, with your authorization, ***** lbs of aluminum for your extrusion
needs during the 3rd quarter of this year. the extrusions will be purchased and
delivered from our Yankton plant at a base price of ***** per pound on solid
shapes, and ***** per pound on hollow shapes. As per our previous agreements,
any side panels will require a ***** adder. All prices include delivery to
Cresco, Iowa. Featherlite will provide payment for each truckload via wire
transfer at point of shipment. We are reserving ***** lbs per week to support
your program. The prices and tonnage stated above are firm as metal has been
secured to cover this contract. Thanks again for your business.


Yours truly,



Herb Grubbs
Regional Sales Manager

Cc:      Brian Plunk - Plant City
         Charlie Campbell - Plant city
         Jan Mauch - Yankton
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Park Service published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 5, 2005 concerning the Two Hundred Fifty-Fifth Notice of Meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission. The document contained an incorrect date.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George E. Price, Jr., 508-349-3785 x 202. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 5, 2005, in FR Doc. 05-19961, on page 58239, in the second paragraph, correct the paragraph to read:                     

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, Section 10), that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission will be held on December 12, 2005. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

George E. Price, Jr., 

Superintendent. 

[FR Doc. 05-21224 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
#### JON W. LOVE, Appellant, v. RICHARD WELLS and REGINA DEAN, Respondents.

No. 11056

January 3, 1980

604 P.2d 362

[Rehearing denied February 25, 1980]

*L. Earl Hawley,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Daniel Marks,*Clark County Legal Services Program, for Respondents.

*13OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

The issue in the district court was priority in competing claims to a 1974 Cadillac automobile. The third party claimant, Love, claimed priority due to a perfected security interest. The plaintiff, Wells, claimed priority as a judgment lien creditor. The district court ruled that Love did not have an enforceable security interest since NRS 104.9203 was not complied with in that the financing statement offered to show a security interest did not contain language creating a security interest. McCorquodale v. Holiday, Inc., 90 Nev. 67, 518 P.2d 1097 (1974); American Card Co. v. H.M.H. Co., 196 A.2d 150 (R.I. 1963).

The record fully supports that determination.

Affirmed.