alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Vincent Rossi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of St. Bernard Software, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



By:

/s/ Vincent RossiVincent RossiChief Executive OfficerDated: August 17, 2007
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Mineral
Acquisition Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Simon
Mu, Chief Executive Officer and President of China Mineral Acquisition
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
China Mineral Acquisition Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

November 18, 2004                          /s/ Simon Mu
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Simon Mu
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
```
Exhibit 10.5

PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of 900-1281 West Georgia
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7, promises to pay to or to
the order of Joseph A. Fiore, ("the Payee") of 670 White Plains Road, Suite 120,
Scarsdale, New York the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND FIFTEEN UNITED STATES
DOLLARS and TWENTY CENTS ($107,015.20) with eight percent (8%) interest thereon,
the sum total principal and interest being due and payable ON DEMAND BY JOSEPH
A. FI0RE IN WRITING .

CYPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BYWAY OF WRI1TEN
RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and payable under the laws of the State of New York, United States of
America.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day Of June 2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation



<PAGE>
PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR INTEREST ACCRUED ON OUTSTANDING DEBT, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of
900-1281 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7,
promises to pay to or to the order of Joseph A. Fiore, ("the Payee") of 670
White Plains Road, Suite 120, Scarsdale, New York the sum of THIRTY TWO THOUSAND
ONE HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE UNITED STATES DOLLARS and NINETY EIGHT CENTS ($32,165.98)
being due and payable ON DEMAND BY JOSEPH A. FIORE IN WRITING.

CVPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BYWAY OF WRI1TEN
RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and payable under the laws of the State of New York, United States of
America.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day Of June 2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation



<PAGE>
#### Regina J. NIX, Plaintiff, v. The EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF the UNITED STATES and Waymon Stewart, Defendants.

No. 90-1910C(6).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

May 3, 1991.

*863Mary Ann Weems, Sestric Korum & Weems, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Mary Murphy, Ziercher & Hocker, St. Louis, Mo., Michael Winn Brody, Law Office of Norman L. Tolle, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GUNN, District Judge.

The parties appeared before this Court on May 3, 1991 for a hearing on the single issue of whether plaintiff timely filed this action pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Both sides presented testimony and evidence to the Court. Based on such, the Court renders the following findings and conclusions.

This Court finds that the evidence overwhelmingly points to receipt by the plaintiff of her notice of the right to sue on July 3, 1990. Although plaintiff denies receiving the notice on that date, and claims that she did not receive it until July 10, 1990, the physical evidence mandates a contrary conclusion. Defendants produced a return receipt signed by the plaintiff which had been stamp-dated July 3, 1990. Furthermore, defendants presented an additional non-disclosure form signed by plaintiff, which was also dated July 3, 1990, albeit not by plaintiff. The evidence was additionally supported by the testimony of two EEOC employees who dealt with the plaintiff. They testified that the plaintiff received the right to sue notice on the same date as she signed the return receipt and the non-disclosure form, and that those documents were dated by those employees on that same date. Plaintiff presented no evidence that the date on the documents was a mistake or was- falsified, and the EEOC employees agreed that they had no interest in the outcome of the plaintiffs action against the defendants.

Given this Court's finding, plaintiffs present complaint pursuant to Title VII is time-barred. The statute clearly provides that a legal action pursuant to Title VII must be filed within ninety days of the receipt of the right to sue notice from the EEOC. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l). Although that time period is not jurisdictional, plaintiff does not claim the occurrence of any of the circumstances which would support equitable tolling of the time period by this Court. *See Hill v. John Chezik Imports,*869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989). Therefore, plaintiffs complaint against the defendants must be dismissed as time-barred.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

             [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS LETTERHEAD]


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the use of this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our reserve 
report dated February 15, 1999 relating to the oil and gas reserves of 
Bellwether Exploration Company at January 1, 1999.  We also consent to the 
references to us under the heading "Reserves" in the Notes to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements of Bellwether Exploration Company in such report.


                                  /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

                                  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Houston, Texas
March 11, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5386 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5386

     To ban the sale, manufacture, distribution, and use in public 
   facilities of drop-side cribs in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2010

 Mr. Crowley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To ban the sale, manufacture, distribution, and use in public 
   facilities of drop-side cribs in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAN ON DROP-SIDE CRIBS.

    (a) Drop-Side Crib Defined.--In this section, the term ``drop-side 
crib'' means any infant crib that has at least 1 side that moves up and 
down. Such term does not include a drop-gate crib or any other crib 
that has immovable sides with a portion of 1 side capable of being 
folded down.
    (b) Ban.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, every 
covered product shall be treated as a banned hazardous product pursuant 
to a rule promulgated under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety 
Act (15 U.S.C. 2057).
    (c) Covered Product.--For purposes of this section, a covered 
product is any drop-side crib that is sold, offered for sale, 
manufactured for sale, distributed in commerce, used in public 
facilities such as hotels or day care centers, or imported into the 
United States on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### WILLIAM D. WHEELER v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45349.

Decided October 5, 1942]

*Mr. Mahlon O. Masterson*for the plaintiff. Ansell, *An-sell <& Marshall*were on the briefs.

*Miss Stella*AMn, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney ' General Francis M.*Shea, for the defendant. *Mr. Oarl Eardley*was on the brief.

*281The court decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, in an opinion *per*curiam, as follows:

The petition in this case is dismissed upon the authority of *Earl S. Schofield*v. *United*States, No. 45293, decided today. It is so ordered.
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of RTI International    Metals, Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Dawne S. Hickton, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007    (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.    78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     February 28, 2008 /s/  Dawne    S. Hickton    Dawne S. Hickton*Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*      *     This certification is made solely for the purposes of    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge    standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.T., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DENVERMONTEBELLO STATION POST OFFICE, 

Denver, CO, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0668

Issued: October 29, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 8, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a May 7, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 21-0668. 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act 

(FECA).2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of 

OWCP’s decision.3

The 180th day following the May 7, 2020 decision was November 3, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until February 8, 2021, more than 180 days after the May 7, 

1 The Board notes that appellant’s appeal form indicates that she is requesting an appeal from various other 

purported decisions. However, the last final adverse decision of record is OWCP’s May 7, 2020 decision.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

3

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0668 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained the failure to 

timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling 

circumstances. Because there is no adverse, final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of 

the February 8, 2021 filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as 

No. 21-0668, must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0668 is dismissed.

Issued: October 29, 2021

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at 

§ 501.6(d).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Darlene Harris,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-21579  Filed 10-25-05; 2:53 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5158 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5158

   To require Federal contractors and subcontractors to comply with 
       certain reporting requirements and transparency standards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2010

Mr. Wilson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require Federal contractors and subcontractors to comply with 
       certain reporting requirements and transparency standards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Summitville Procurement Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS.

    (a) Requirement.--In the case of a Federal contract awarded by any 
department or agency of the Federal Government, the contract shall 
require, as a condition of the contract, that the contractor--
            (1) shall comply with procurement reporting requirements 
        and transparency standards in the performance of the contract;
            (2) shall require any subcontractor under the contract to 
        comply with such requirements and standards; and
            (3) shall submit to the department or agency that awarded 
        the contract a report regarding all subcontracts awarded in the 
        performance of the contract, including the procedures used in 
        awarding the subcontracts.
    (b) Reporting Requirements and Transparency Standards.--In this 
Act, the term ``procurement reporting requirements and transparency 
standards'' means each of the following:
            (1) A requirement to publicize proposed contracting 
        opportunities.
            (2) A requirement to select a contractor based on full and 
        open competition, with the award going to the lowest-priced 
        responsible qualified bidder, in the case of procurements 
        conducted by sealed bidding, or the offeror whose proposal 
        represents best value for the government, in the case of 
        negotiated procurements.
            (3) A requirement to report information on which bidder or 
        offeror received the contract award.
            (4) A requirement to disclose certain information to 
        unsuccessful bidders or offerors.
            (5) The ability to access a copy of the contract of the 
        winning bidder or offeror.
    (c) Effective Date.--The requirements of this section shall apply 
with respect to contracts entered into on and after the date occurring 
90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5145 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5145

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the continuing 
 professional education reimbursement provided to health professionals 
            employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assuring Quality Care for Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 
              FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS EMPLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7411 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
            (2) by striking ``board-certified physician or dentist 
        appointed under section 7401(1) of this title'' and inserting 
        ``health professional appointed under paragraph (1) or (3) of 
        section 7401 of this title'';
            (3) by striking ``$1,000'' and inserting ``$1,600'';
            (4) by inserting ``required to maintain licensure'' after 
        ``professional education''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``No 
        such health professional may receive reimbursement under this 
        section and reimbursement for the same expenses incurred for 
        continuing professional education provided by a Department 
        medical center.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) Section heading.--The heading for such section is 
        amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7411. Full-time health professionals: reimbursement of 
              continuing professional education expenses''.
            (2) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 74 of such title is amended by striking 
        the item relating to section 7411 and inserting the following 
        new item:

``7411. Full-time health professionals: reimbursement of continuing 
                            professional education expenses.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5145

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the continuing 
 professional education reimbursement provided to health professionals 
            employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
```