##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission
File Number 000-50845

McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 20-1193199                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (IRS Employer Identification Number)
|                                                               | 
|720 SW Washington Street, Suite 550 Portland, Oregon           |  | 97205                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          

(503) 226-3440

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer  x                Non-accelerated filer ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes ̈No  x

There were 14,224,802 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 1, 2006.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

INDEX



|                                                                                                                    |  |   
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                                       |  | 3 
|Item 1 - Financial Statements - (Unaudited)                                                                         |  | 3 
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and July 1, 2006                                                |  | 3 
|Consolidated Statements of Income for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 25, 2005 and July 1, 2006 |  | 4 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005 and July 1, 2006           |  | 5 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                          |  | 6 
|Item 2 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                      |  | 10
|Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                 |  | 16
|Item 4 - Controls and Procedures                                                                                    |  | 16
|PART II. OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                          |  | 16
|Item 1 - Legal Proceedings                                                                                          |  | 16
|Item 1A - Risk Factors                                                                                              |  | 16
|Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                |  | 20
|Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                            |  | 20
|Item 4 - Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                       |  | 20
|Item 5 - Other Information                                                                                          |  | 20
|Item 6 - Exhibits                                                                                                   |  | 20
|Signatures                                                                                                          |  | 21



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|------- | --------------------

McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance
Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data)



|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | ------------ | - | -------
|                                                                                                           |  | December 31,2005 |         | July 1, 2006
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         | (Unaudited) 
|Assets                                                                                                     |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Current assets                                                                                             |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                  |  | $                | 4,705   |              | $ | 9,296  
|Trade accounts receivable, net                                                                             |  |                  | 5,081   |              |   | 5,388  
|Tenant improvement allowance receivables                                                                   |  |                  | 1,780   |              |   | 1,622  
|Inventories                                                                                                |  |                  | 4,517   |              |   | 4,463  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                                  |  |                  | 3,020   |              |   | 4,209  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                                      |  |                  | 6,688   |              |   | 5,407  
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total current assets                                                                                       |  |                  | 25,791  |              |   | 30,385 
|Equipment and leasehold improvements, net                                                                  |  |                  | 104,727 |              |   | 110,300
|Other assets                                                                                               |  |                  | 53,646  |              |   | 53,628 
|Goodwill                                                                                                   |  |                  | 19,996  |              |   | 19,996 
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total assets                                                                                               |  | $                | 204,160 |              | $ | 214,309
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                                                                       |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Current liabilities                                                                                        |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Accounts payable                                                                                           |  | $                | 13,431  |              | $ | 11,734 
|Accrued expenses                                                                                           |  |                  | 18,970  |              |   | 22,411 
|Capital lease obligations, current portion                                                                 |  |                  | 368     |              |   | 380    
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total current liabilities                                                                                  |  |                  | 32,769  |              |   | 34,525 
|Other long-term liabilities                                                                                |  |                  | 15,618  |              |   | 16,817 
|Capital lease obligations, noncurrent portion                                                              |  |                  | 338     |              |   | 146    
|Deferred income taxes                                                                                      |  |                  | 11,982  |              |   | 12,125 
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total liabilities                                                                                          |  |                  | 60,707  |              |   | 63,613 
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Contingencies (Note 8)                                                                                     |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Stockholders equity                                                                                       |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Common stock, $0.001 par value, 120,000 shares authorized, 14,179 and 14,225 shares issued and outstanding |  |                  | 14      |              |   | 14     
|Additional paid in capital                                                                                 |  |                  | 136,292 |              |   | 137,686
|Retained earnings                                                                                          |  |                  | 7,147   |              |   | 12,996 
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                 |  |                  | 143,453 |              |   | 150,696
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                                                 |  | $                | 204,160 |              | $ | 214,309
|                                                                                                           |  |                  |         |              |   |        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements
of Income-Unaudited

(in thousands, except per share data)



|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | ----------- | ---------------------------- | ------ | ------------ |  | ----------- | ------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                              |  | Thirteen week period ended |        |             | Twenty-six week period ended |       
|                                              |  | June 25,2005               |        | July 1,2006 |                              |        | June 25,2005 |  | July 1,2006 |        
|Revenues                                      |  | $                          | 68,386 |             | $                            | 76,763 |              |  | $           | 128,771 |  | $ | 148,369 |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant operating costs                    |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Food and beverage                             |  |                            | 19,927 |             |                              | 22,363 |              |  |             | 37,687  |  |   | 43,386  |  
|Labor                                         |  |                            | 21,380 |             |                              | 23,802 |              |  |             | 40,736  |  |   | 46,537  |  
|Operating                                     |  |                            | 9,998  |             |                              | 11,137 |              |  |             | 19,014  |  |   | 21,623  |  
|Occupancy                                     |  |                            | 6,061  |             |                              | 6,924  |              |  |             | 11,666  |  |   | 13,514  |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Total restaurant operating costs              |  |                            | 57,366 |             |                              | 64,226 |              |  |             | 109,103 |  |   | 125,060 |  
|General and administrative expenses           |  |                            | 3,561  |             |                              | 3,983  |              |  |             | 6,903   |  |   | 7,954   |  
|Restaurant pre-opening costs                  |  |                            | 759    |             |                              | 722    |              |  |             | 1,288   |  |   | 1,485   |  
|Depreciation and amortization                 |  |                            | 2,381  |             |                              | 2,725  |              |  |             | 4,613   |  |   | 5,384   |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Total costs and expenses                      |  |                            | 64,067 |             |                              | 71,656 |              |  |             | 121,907 |  |   | 139,883 |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Operating income                              |  |                            | 4,319  |             |                              | 5,107  |              |  |             | 6,864   |  |   | 8,486   |  
|Interest expense (income), net                |  |                            | 166    |             |                              | (87    | )            |  |             | 323     |  |   | (90     | )
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Income before income taxes                    |  |                            | 4,153  |             |                              | 5,194  |              |  |             | 6,541   |  |   | 8,576   |  
|Income tax expense                            |  |                            | 1,287  |             |                              | 1,652  |              |  |             | 2,028   |  |   | 2,727   |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Net income                                    |  | $                          | 2,866  |             | $                            | 3,542  |              |  | $           | 4,513   |  | $ | 5,849   |  
|                                              |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Net income per share                          |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                         |  | $                          | 0.21   |             | $                            | 0.25   |              |  | $           | 0.33    |  | $ | 0.41    |  
|Diluted                                       |  | $                          | 0.21   |             | $                            | 0.24   |              |  | $           | 0.32    |  | $ | 0.40    |  
|Shares used in computing net income per share |  |                            |        |             |                              |        |              |  |             |         |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                         |  |                            | 13,782 |             |                              | 14,218 |              |  |             | 13,782  |  |   | 14,206  |  
|Diluted                                       |  |                            | 13,958 |             |                              | 14,530 |              |  |             | 13,959  |  |   | 14,508  |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows-Unaudited

(in thousands)



|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------- | - | ----------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | Twenty-six week period ended |        
|                                                                                 |  | June 25,2005                 |         |   | July 1,2006 |  
|Operating activities                                                             |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Net income                                                                       |  | $                            | 4,513   |   |             | $ | 5,849   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                              | 4,613   |   |             |   | 5,384   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                            |  |                              | 2,028   |   |             |   | 1,424   |  
|Equity based compensation                                                        |  |                              |        |   |             |   | 575     |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities                                      |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Trade accounts receivable                                                        |  |                              | (6      | ) |             |   | (307    | )
|Tenant improvement allowance receivables                                         |  |                              | (2,641  | ) |             |   | 158     |  
|Inventories                                                                      |  |                              | (118    | ) |             |   | 54      |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                        |  |                              | (206    | ) |             |   | (1,189  | )
|Accounts payable                                                                 |  |                              | (1,012  | ) |             |   | (1,697  | )
|Accrued expenses                                                                 |  |                              | 1,244   |   |             |   | 3,441   |  
|Other long-term liabilities                                                      |  |                              | 2,253   |   |             |   | 1,199   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                        |  |                              | 10,668  |   |             |   | 14,891  |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Investing activities                                                             |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Acquisition of equipment and leasehold improvements                              |  |                              | (10,861 | ) |             |   | (10,862 | )
|Other assets                                                                     |  |                              | (7      | ) |             |   | (77     | )
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                            |  |                              | (10,868 | ) |             |   | (10,939 | )
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Financing activities                                                             |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Increase in book overdraft                                                       |  |                              | 480     |   |             |   |        |  
|Borrowings made on revolving credit facility                                     |  |                              | 6,500   |   |             |   |        |  
|Payments made on revolving credit facility                                       |  |                              | (6,500  | ) |             |   |        |  
|Payments on capital lease obligations                                            |  |                              | (218    | ) |             |   | (180    | )
|Proceeds from stock options exercised                                            |  |                              |        |   |             |   | 546     |  
|Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation                                |  |                              |        |   |             |   | 273     |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                        |  |                              | 262     |   |             |   | 639     |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                                        |  |                              | 62      |   |             |   | 4,591   |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period                                   |  |                              | 451     |   |             |   | 4,705   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of period                                         |  | $                            | 513     |   |             | $ | 9,296   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                                 |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Cash paid during the period                                                      |  |                              |         |   |             |   |         |  
|Interest                                                                         |  | $                            | 461     |   |             | $ | 168     |  
|Income taxes                                                                     |  | $                            | 92      |   |             | $ | 1,033   |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements-Unaudited



|1. | The Business and Organization
|-- | -----------------------------

McCormick & Schmicks
Seafood Restaurants, Inc. is a leading national seafood restaurant operator in the affordable upscale dining segment. McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. is the survivor of a merger with McCormick &
Schmick Holdings LLC (the LLC) that occurred on July 20, 2004, prior to the Companys initial public offering. As of July 1, 2006 the Company owned and operated 62 restaurants in 24 states and the District of Columbia,
including two pursuant to management agreements.



|2. | Basis of Presentation
|-- | ---------------------

The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a fair statement have been included. Operating results for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2006.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.



|3. | Summary of Selected Accounting Policies
|-- | ---------------------------------------

Principles of
Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks
Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Management
Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are
recognized at the point of delivery of products and services. A deferred liability is recognized for gift certificates and gift cards that have been sold but not yet redeemed. The Company recognizes revenue and reduces the related deferred liability
when the gift certificates and gift cards are redeemed.

Share-Based Compensation Plan

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Share Based Payment (revised 2004)
(SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) and requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share-based
compensation. The Company adopted SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R supersedes the Companys previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25) for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123R. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB
107 in its adoption of SFAS 123R.

On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, Transition Election Related to
Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Awards. The Company has elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to SFAS 123R. The
alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, and to determine the
subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123R.

The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the
first day of the Companys fiscal year 2006. The Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123R. In accordance with the
modified prospective transition method, the Companys consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123R. Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS
123R for the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2006 was $0.3 million, and $0.6 million, respectively, which consisted of share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock. There was no
share-based compensation expense recognized related to stock awards during the thirteen week or twenty-six week periods ended June 25, 2005.

SFAS
123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the
requisite service periods in the Companys consolidated statements of income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for share-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25
as allowed under SFAS 123.

Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of income for the thirteen week and
twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2006



6



---

##### Table of Contents

included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair
value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123. Because share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2006 is based
on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.

Upon adoption of SFAS 123R (see Note 6), the Company determined the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as the Companys assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables, including but not limited to the Companys expected
stock price volatility over the term of the awards, life of the option, expected term of the option, the estimated forfeiture rate, the risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield. The Companys expected stock price volatility was
based on historical volatility of the Companys stock price and expected future changes in the Companys stock price volatility. The option life was based on the contractual life of the option. The expected term of the option was based on
an average of selected peer companies in the Companys industry and our expectation of average time until exercise of the options by the grantees. The estimated forfeiture rate was based on historical data and estimated future terminations over
the vesting period of the award. The risk-free interest rate was based on the implied yield available at the time of grant on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues. Dividend yield is based on managements estimation of dividends to be paid in the
future.

The fair value of the Companys options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following
assumptions:



|                          |  |                                            |   |  |              |  
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ | - |  | ------------ | -
|                          |  | Thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended |  
|                          |  | June 25, 2005                              |   |  | July 1, 2006 |  
|Expected volatility       |  | 24.3                                       | % |  | 24.3         | %
|Option life               |  | 10 years                                   |   |  | 10 years     |  
|Expected term             |  | 5.5 years                                  |   |  | 5.5 years    |  
|Estimated forfeiture rate |  | 9                                          | % |  | 9            | %
|Risk-free interest rate   |  | 3.9                                        | % |  | 3.9          | %
|Dividend yield            |  | 0                                          | % |  | 0            | %

In May 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved, and the Company issued, 142,000 shares of restricted
stock to certain employees and executive officers. One third of the restricted stock grant vests on each of the three anniversary dates following the grant date if the grantee is then employed by the Company.

The following table represents the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of
SFAS 123 to share-based compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts).



|                                                             |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------------------------ | - | ------ | -
|                                                             |  | Thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005 |        |   | Twenty-six week period ended June 25,
2005 |  
|Net income, as reported                                      |  | $                                        | 2,866  |   |                                            | $ | 4,513  |  
|Compensation cost based on the fair value method, net of tax |  |                                          | (219   | ) |                                            |   | (435   | )
|                                                             |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|Pro forma net income                                         |  | $                                        | 2,647  |   |                                            | $ | 4,078  |  
|                                                             |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|Basic net income per share                                   |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|As reported                                                  |  | $                                        | 0.21   |   |                                            | $ | 0.33   |  
|Pro forma                                                    |  | $                                        | 0.19   |   |                                            | $ | 0.30   |  
|Fully diluted net income per share                           |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|As reported                                                  |  | $                                        | 0.21   |   |                                            | $ | 0.32   |  
|Pro forma                                                    |  | $                                        | 0.19   |   |                                            | $ | 0.29   |  
|Shares used in computing net income per share                |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|As reported                                                  |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|Basic                                                        |  |                                          | 13,782 |   |                                            |   | 13,782 |  
|Fully diluted                                                |  |                                          | 13,958 |   |                                            |   | 13,959 |  
|Pro forma                                                    |  |                                          |        |   |                                            |   |        |  
|Basic                                                        |  |                                          | 13,782 |   |                                            |   | 13,782 |  
|Fully diluted                                                |  |                                          | 13,856 |   |                                            |   | 13,848 |  

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and
dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of employee stock options.

SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share, requires that employee equity share options, non-vested shares and similar equity instruments granted by the Company be treated as potential common shares outstanding in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted
shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options and is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method assumed proceeds include the amount the
employee must pay for exercising stock options, the purchase price the grantee pays for restricted stock, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits, if any, that would
be credited to additional paid-in capital upon the exercise of the options or vesting of the restricted stock.

Operating Leases

The Company operates its restaurants in leased premises. The Company records the minimum base rents for its operating leases using the straight-line method over the life
of the lease term, including option periods that are reasonably assured of renewal due to the presence of certain economic penalties. For purposes of calculating straight-line rents, the lease term commences on the date the lessee obtains control of
the property, which is normally when the property is ready for normal tenant



7



---

##### Table of Contents

improvements (build-out period). For certain leases the Company only has the right to exercise its option for renewal if certain sales targets are achieved
at or near the renewal date. These renewal option periods have been included in the lease term when the Company determines at lease inception or at the acquisition date of the restaurant, if later, that the sales targets are nonsubstantive and
achievement of such sales targets is virtually certain. The difference between rent expense calculated using the straight-line method and minimum rent paid is recorded as a deferred rent liability. The Company receives certain tenant improvement
allowances, which are considered lease incentives and are amortized as reduction of rent expense over the lease term. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a deferred rent liability for the straight-lining of rents and lease incentives, which is
included in other long-term liabilities, of $13.1 million and $15.8 million as of June 25, 2005 and July 1, 2006, respectively.



|4. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|-- | --------------------------------

In October 2005, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 13-1, Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period (FSP 13-1). FSP 13-1 requires rental costs associated with ground or building operating leases incurred during a construction
period to be recognized as rental expense. FSP 13-1 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Retroactive application is permitted, but not required. The Company adopted this standard as of January 1, 2006. The
adoption of this standard has not had a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correctionsa Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS 154), which requires retrospective application to prior periods
financial statements of every voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors beginning in fiscal 2006. The Company adopted this standard as of
January 1, 2006. The adoption of this standard has not had any effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.

In July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48). FIN 48 creates a single model to address uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income
taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure, and transition. In addition, FIN 48 clarifies that income taxes are not within the scope of FASB statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. FIN 48 applies to all tax positions related to income taxes
subject to FASB statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, This includes tax positions considered to be routine as well as those with a high degree of uncertainty. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.



|5. | Long-Term Debt and Standby Letters of Credit
|-- | --------------------------------------------

The Company has a
$50.0 million revolving credit facility under which borrowings are collateralized by a first priority security interest in all of the Companys assets and matures on July 23, 2009. As of July 1, 2006, there was no outstanding
balance on the credit facility. The interest rate on the credit facility is based on the financial institutions prime rate plus a margin of up to 0.75% or the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 0.75% to 1.75%, with margins determined by certain
financial ratios.

The revolving credit facility agreement also provides for bank guarantees under standby letter of credit arrangements in the normal
course of business operations. Our commercial bank issues standby letters of credit to secure our obligations to pay or perform when required to pursuant to the requirements of an underlying agreement or the provision of goods and services. The
standby letters of credit are cancelable only at the option of the beneficiary who is authorized to draw drafts on the issuing bank up to the face amount of the standby letter of credit in accordance with its terms. As of July 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 the maximum exposure under these standby letters of credit was $1.5 million, and there were no amounts drawn upon these letters of credit. At July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had $48.5 million
available under its revolving credit facility.

Under the revolving credit facility agreement, the Company is subject to certain financial and
non-financial covenants, including an adjusted leverage ratio, a consolidated cash flow ratio, and a growth capital expenditures limitation. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of July 1, 2006.



|6. | Share-Based Compensation
|-- | ------------------------

On June 16, 2004, the Company
adopted its 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) under which 1,500,000 shares were reserved for issuance. Under the Plan, the Company may grant stock options, restricted stock and other awards to employees, directors, and consultants of
the Company and of any parent or subsidiary of the Company. On July 20, 2004, the Company issued to officers and employees options to purchase an aggregate of 879,600 shares of common stock at $12.00 per share. These options become exercisable
over a three-year period and are intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company issues new shares upon exercise of stock options. On May 23, 2006 the Company issued to officers
and employees an aggregate of 142,000 shares of restricted stock. One third of the restricted stock grant vests on each of the three anniversary dates following the grant date if the grantee is then employed by the Company. Additional awards granted
under the Plan may be in the form of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, stock bonuses and performance-based awards.

Incentive stock options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock, or 110% of the fair market value of the common
stock for any greater than 10% owner of the Companys common stock, on the date of grant. Vesting of awards under the Plan may vary. Each award granted under the Plan may, at the discretion of the board of directors of the Company, become fully
exercisable or payable, as applicable, upon a change of control of the Company.

Each award expires on the date determined at the date of grant; however,
the maximum term of options, SARs and other rights to acquire common stock under the Plan is ten years after the initial date of the award, subject to provisions for further deferred payment in certain circumstances. These and other awards may
also be issued solely or in part for services. Any shares subject to awards that are not paid or exercised before they expire or are terminated will become available for other award grants under the Plan. If not sooner terminated by the
Companys board of directors, the Plan will terminate on June 16, 2014. As of July 1, 2006, options to acquire a total of 879,600 shares of the Companys common stock have been granted under the Plan at a price equal to $12.00
and 142,000 shares of restricted stock have been awarded.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the status of the Companys stock option activity as of July 1, 2006:



|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|-------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------- | - | ---------
|                                 |  | Shares  |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |       | Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|Outstanding at July 17, 2004     |  |        |  | $                               |      |                           |   |          
|Granted                          |  | 879,600 |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|Forfeited                        |  | 9,100   |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|Outstanding at December 25, 2004 |  | 870,500 |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|Exercised                        |  | 16,856  |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|Forfeited                        |  | 20,798  |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |  | 832,846 |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   |          
|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|Exercised                        |  | 45,596  |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           | $ | 567,266  
|Forfeited                        |  | 4,332   |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   | 51,118   
|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|Outstanding at July 1, 2006      |  | 782,918 |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   | 9,238,432
|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |       |                           |   |          
|Exercisable at July 1, 2006      |  | 220,845 |  |                                 | 12.00 |                           |   | 2,605,971

The table below summarizes information about stock options outstanding at July 1, 2006:



|                         |  |                   |  |                                                    |  |                                |  |                   |  |                                
|------------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Outstanding              |  | Exercisable      
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | Number of Options |  | Weighted AverageRemaining Yearsof Contractual Life |  | Weighted AverageExercise price |  | Number of Options |  | Weighted Average Exercise price
|$12.00                   |  | 782,918           |  | 8.0                                                |  | $12.00                         |  | 220,845           |  | $12.00                         

The table below summarizes information about restricted stock at July 1, 2006:

|                                 |  |         |  |                                 |   |                           |   |          
|-------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------------------------------- | - | ------------------------- | - | ---------
|                                 |  | Shares  |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |   | Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |  |        |  | $                               |  |                           |   |          
|Granted                          |  | 142,000 |  |                                 |  |                           | $ | 3,379,600
|Vested                           |  |        |  |                                 |  |                           |   |          
|Forfeited                        |  |        |  |                                 |  |                           |   |          
|Outstanding at July 1, 2006      |  | 142,000 |  |                                 |  |                           |   | 3,379,600
|Exercisable at July 1, 2006      |  |        |  |                                 |  |                           |   |          

Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods
ended July 1, 2006 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, which consisted of share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock. There was no share-based compensation expense recognized related to
stock awards during the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended June 25, 2005. As of July 1, 2006, the total unamortized compensation cost related to stock options and restricted stock granted to employees under the Companys
2004 Stock Incentive Plan was $0.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense related to
employee stock options under SFAS 123R for the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended June 25, 2005 and July 1, 2006 (in thousands):



|                                                                               |  |                            |   |                              |   |               |  |              |   |  |   |    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- | - | ---------------------------- | - | ------------- |  | ------------ | - |  | - | ---
|                                                                               |  | Thirteen week period ended |   | Twenty-six week period ended
|                                                                               |  | June 25, 2005              |   | July 1, 2006                 |   | June 25, 2005 |  | July 1, 2006
|Labor                                                                          |  | $                          |  |                              | $ | 20            |  | $            |  |  | $ | 39 
|General and administrative expenses                                            |  |                            |  |                              |   | 328           |  |              |  |  |   | 536
|                                                                               |  |                            |   |                              |   |               |  |              |   |  |   |    
|Share-based compensation expense included in total costs and expenses          |  |                            |  |                              |   | 348           |  |              |  |  |   | 575
|Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation                         |  |                            |  |                              |   | 77            |  |              |  |  |   | 108
|                                                                               |  |                            |   |                              |   |               |  |              |   |  |   |    
|Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, net of tax |  | $                          |  |                              | $ | 271           |  | $            |  |  | $ | 467
|                                                                               |  |                            |   |                              |   |               |  |              |   |  |   |    



|7. | Related Party Transactions
|-- | --------------------------

The Company leases properties from
landlords controlled by certain stockholders of the Company. Total rent paid to these landlords was $0.2 million for each of the thirteen week periods ended July 1, 2006 and June 25, 2005, and $0.4 million for each of the twenty-six week
periods ended July 1, 2006 and June 25, 2005.



|8. | Contingencies
|-- | -------------

The Company is subject to various claims, possible
legal actions, and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these issues, management is of the opinion that adequate provision for potential losses has been made in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report, and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005 contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following section contains forward-looking
statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include those regarding anticipated restaurant openings, anticipated costs and sizes of future restaurants and the adequacy of anticipated sources of cash to
fund our future capital requirements. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Words such as believes, anticipates, expects, intends,
plans and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include those discussed below under Risk Factors. We do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements after the date
they are made or to conform them to actual results or to changes in circumstances or expectations.

Overview

Our Company was founded in 1972 with William P. McCormicks acquisition of Jakes Famous Crawfish in Portland, Oregon. In July 2004 we completed our initial
public offering. We have expanded our restaurant base to 62 restaurants in 24 states and the District of Columbia, as of July 1, 2006, including two restaurants operated pursuant to management contracts.

We have grown our business by offering our customers a daily-printed menu with a broad selection of affordable, quality fresh seafood in an upscale environment, serviced
by knowledgeable and professional management and staff. Our revenues are generated by sales at our restaurants, including banquets.

We measure performance
using key operating indicators such as comparable restaurant sales, food and beverage costs, labor costs, restaurant operating expenses, and total occupancy costs, with a focus on these costs and expenses as a percentage of revenues. For purposes of
comparable restaurant sales, a restaurant is included in the comparable restaurant base in the first full quarter following the eighteenth month of operations. We also track trends in average weekly revenues at both the restaurant level and on
a consolidated basis as an indicator of our performance. The key operating measure used by management in evaluating our operating results is operating income. Operating income is calculated by deducting restaurant operating costs, general and
administrative expenses, restaurant pre-opening costs, depreciation and amortization and other corporate costs from revenues. Restaurant pre-opening costs are analyzed based on the number and timing of restaurant openings and by comparison to
budgeted amounts, with an overall target of approximately $0.3 million to $0.4 million per restaurant opening, which may include up to $0.1 million in non-cash rent expense during the construction period.

The most significant restaurant operating costs are food and beverage costs and labor and related employee benefits. We believe our national and regional presence allows
us to achieve better quality and pricing on key products than most of our competitors. We closely monitor food and beverage costs and regularly review our selection of preferred vendors on the basis of several key metrics, including pricing. In
addition, because we print our menu at least once daily in most of our restaurants, we are able to adapt the seafood items we offer to changes in vendor pricing to optimize our revenue mix and mitigate the impact of cost increases in any particular
seafood item by substituting a lower-cost alternative on our menu or by adjusting the price. With respect to labor costs, we believe the combination of future growth in revenues and the resulting greater leverage of our vice presidents of operations
and regional managers will allow us to better leverage payroll expenses over time. Our employee benefits include health insurance, the cost of which continues to increase faster than the general rate of inflation. We continually monitor this cost
and review strategies to effectively control increases.

General and administrative expenses are controlled in absolute amounts and monitored as a
percentage of revenues. As we have continued our growth, we have incurred substantial training costs and made significant investments in infrastructure, including our information systems. As we continue to grow and are able to leverage investments
made in our people and systems, we expect these expenses to decrease as a percentage of revenues over time.

Identification of appropriate new restaurant
sites is essential to our growth strategy. We evaluate and invest in new restaurants based on site-specific projected returns on investment. We believe our restaurant model and flexible real estate strategy provide us with continued opportunities to
find attractive real estate locations on favorable terms.

Strategic Focus and Operating Outlook

Our primary business focus for over 34 years has been to consistently offer a broad selection of high quality, fresh seafood, which we believe commands strong loyalty
from our customers. We have successfully expanded our McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurant concept throughout the United States and have competed effectively with national and regional restaurant chains and with local restaurant
operators.

Our objective is to continue to prudently grow McCormick & Schmicks seafood restaurants in existing and new markets. Our 2006
plan includes opening eight new restaurants, three of which were opened as of July 1, 2006. In addition to new restaurant growth, we are committed to improving comparable restaurant sales and operating margins over the levels achieved in 2005.

Financial Performance Overview

The following are
highlights of our financial performance for the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005:



| |  |  | Revenues increased 12.2% to $76.8 million from $68.4 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Comparable restaurant sales increased 2.8%
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Operating income increased 18.2% to $5.1 million from $4.3 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Net income increased 23.6% to $3.5 million from $2.9 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.24 from $0.21
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Thirteen Week Period Ended June 25, 2005 Compared to Thirteen Week Period Ended July 1, 2006

The following table sets forth our operating results from our unaudited consolidated statements of income.



|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ |  | ------------ | - |  | - | ------ | - |  | ----- | --
|                                    |  | Thirteen week period ended |       
|                                    |  | June 25, 2005              |        |  | July 1, 2006 |  
|                                    |  | (in thousands)             |       
|Revenues                            |  | $                          | 68,386 |  | 100.0        | % |  | $ | 76,763 |   |  | 100.0 | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Restaurant operating costs          |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Food and beverage                   |  |                            | 19,927 |  | 29.1         | % |  |   | 22,363 |   |  | 29.2  | % 
|Labor                               |  |                            | 21,380 |  | 31.3         | % |  |   | 23,802 |   |  | 31.0  | % 
|Operating                           |  |                            | 9,998  |  | 14.6         | % |  |   | 11,137 |   |  | 14.5  | % 
|Occupancy                           |  |                            | 6,061  |  | 8.9          | % |  |   | 6,924  |   |  | 9.0   | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Total restaurant operating costs    |  |                            | 57,366 |  | 83.9         | % |  |   | 64,226 |   |  | 83.7  | % 
|General and administrative expenses |  |                            | 3,561  |  | 5.2          | % |  |   | 3,983  |   |  | 5.2   | % 
|Restaurant pre-opening costs        |  |                            | 759    |  | 1.1          | % |  |   | 722    |   |  | 0.9   | % 
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                            | 2,381  |  | 3.5          | % |  |   | 2,725  |   |  | 3.5   | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Total costs and expenses            |  |                            | 64,067 |  | 93.7         | % |  |   | 71,656 |   |  | 93.3  | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Operating income                    |  |                            | 4,319  |  | 6.3          | % |  |   | 5,107  |   |  | 6.7   | % 
|Interest expense (income), net      |  |                            | 166    |  | 0.2          | % |  |   | (87    | ) |  | (0.1  | )%
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Income before income taxes          |  |                            | 4,153  |  | 6.1          | % |  |   | 5,194  |   |  | 6.8   | % 
|Income tax expense                  |  |                            | 1,287  |  | 1.9          | % |  |   | 1,652  |   |  | 2.2   | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   
|Net income                          |  | $                          | 2,866  |  | 4.2          | % |  | $ | 3,542  |   |  | 4.6   | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |  |              |   |  |   |        |   |  |       |   

Revenues and Restaurant Operating Costs

The following table sets forth revenues and restaurant operating costs, including food and beverage, labor, operating and occupancy costs from our unaudited consolidated
statements of income.



|                                 |  |                            |        |                |   |        |  |   |       |  |      |  
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | -------------- | - | ------ |  | - | ----- |  | ---- | -
|                                 |  | Thirteen week period ended |        | Change         |  
|                                 |  | June 25, 2005              |        | July 1, 2006   |   | $      |  | % |      
|                                 |  |                            |        | (in thousands) |   |        |  |   |      
|Revenues                         |  | $                          | 68,386 |                | $ | 76,763 |  | $ | 8,377 |  | 12.2 | %
|                                 |  |                            |        |                |   |        |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Restaurant operating costs       |  |                            |        |                |   |        |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Food and beverage                |  | $                          | 19,927 |                | $ | 22,363 |  | $ | 2,436 |  | 12.2 | %
|Labor                            |  |                            | 21,380 |                |   | 23,802 |  |   | 2,422 |  | 11.3 | %
|Operating                        |  |                            | 9,998  |                |   | 11,137 |  |   | 1,139 |  | 11.4 | %
|Occupancy                        |  |                            | 6,061  |                |   | 6,924  |  |   | 863   |  | 14.2 | %
|                                 |  |                            |        |                |   |        |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Total restaurant operating costs |  | $                          | 57,366 |                | $ | 64,226 |  | $ | 6,860 |  | 12.0 | %
|                                 |  |                            |        |                |   |        |  |   |       |  |      |  

Revenues. Revenues increased $8.4 million, or 12.2%, to $76.8 million in the thirteen week period
ended July 1, 2006 from $68.4 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in comparable restaurant sales of 2.8% coupled with revenues generated by the restaurants
not included in the comparable base. The comparable restaurant sales increase was primarily the result of increased guest counts.

Food and Beverage
Costs. Food and beverage costs increased $2.4 million, or 12.2%, to $22.4 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $19.9 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily
attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Food and beverage costs as a percentage of revenues increased to 29.2% in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from 29.1% in the thirteen week period
ended June 25, 2005.

Labor Costs. Labor costs increased $2.4 million, or 11.3%, to $23.8 million in the thirteen week period ended
July 1, 2006, from $21.4 million in thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Labor costs as a percentage of revenues
decreased to 31.0 % in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from 31.3% in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. The decrease in labor costs as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to the leverage of higher
revenues on fixed labor costs for the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006, coupled with lower workers compensation expense resulting from lower average claims incurred by restaurants.

Operating Costs. Operating costs increased $1.1 million, or 11.4%, to $11.1 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $10.0 million in
the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Operating costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 14.5% in the thirteen
week period ended July 1, 2006 from 14.6% in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to the leverage of higher revenues on fixed operating costs in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006.

Occupancy Costs. Occupancy costs increased $0.9 million, or 14.2%, to $6.9 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $6.1 million in
the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues increased to 9.0% in the thirteen week period ended July 1,
2006 from 8.9% in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to a slight increase in common area maintenance costs and property tax expense for the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses, Restaurant Pre-Opening Costs and Depreciation and Amortization

The following table sets forth general and administrative expenses, restaurant pre-opening costs, and depreciation and amortization from our
unaudited consolidated statements of income.



|                                    |  |                            |       |                |   |       |  |   |     |   |  |      |   
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | -------------- | - | ----- |  | - | --- | - |  | ---- | --
|                                    |  | Thirteen week period ended |       | Change         |  
|                                    |  | June 25, 2005              |       | July 1, 2006   |   | $     |  |   | %   |  
|                                    |  |                            |       | (in thousands) |   |       |  |   |     |  
|General and administrative expenses |  | $                          | 3,561 |                | $ | 3,983 |  | $ | 422 |   |  | 11.9 | % 
|Restaurant pre-opening costs        |  |                            | 759   |                |   | 722   |  |   | (37 | ) |  | (4.9 | )%
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                            | 2,381 |                |   | 2,725 |  |   | 344 |   |  | 14.4 | % 

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or
11.9%, to $4.0 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $3.6 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 5.2% in both the thirteen week
period ended July 1, 2006 and June 25, 2005. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the increase in the number of restaurants coupled with share-based compensation expenses of $0.3 million recognized as a
result of the adoption of SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2006.

Restaurant Pre-Opening Costs. Restaurant pre-opening costs decreased $37,000,
or 4.9%, to $0.7 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $0.8 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to the timing of restaurant openings and restaurants under construction in the
thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005.

Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.3 million, or 14.4%, to $2.7 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 from $2.4 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. The increase was
primarily due to the addition of seven company-owned restaurants since June 25, 2005.

Interest Expense (Income), Net, Income Tax Expense and
Net Income

The following table sets forth interest expense (income), net, income tax expense and net income from our unaudited consolidated
statements of income.



|                               |  |                            |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- | ----- | -------------- | ------ | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | ---- | -
|                               |  | Thirteen week period ended |       |                | Change |      
|                               |  | June 25, 2005              |       | July 1, 2006   |        |       | $ |  |   | %     |  
|                               |  |                            |       | (in thousands) |        |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Interest expense (income), net |  | $                          | 166   |                | $      | (87   | ) |  | $ | (253  | ) |  | NM   | *
|                               |  |                            |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|Income before income taxes     |  | $                          | 4,153 |                | $      | 5,194 |   |  | $ | 1,041 |   |  | 25.1 | %
|Income tax expense             |  |                            | 1,287 |                |        | 1,652 |   |  |   | 365   |   |  | 28.4 | %
|                               |  |                            |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|Net income                     |  | $                          | 2,866 |                | $      | 3,542 |   |  | $ | 676   |   |  | 23.6 | %
|                               |  |                            |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  



|* | Percentage is non-meaningful
|- | ----------------------------

Interest Expense (Income),
Net. Interest income, net of interest expense, was $87,000 in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to interest expense of $166,000 in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. This change was primarily due
to the paydown of our revolving credit facility in December 2005, coupled with interest income earned on our invested cash and cash equivalents.

Income
Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $1.7 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006, which reflects an estimated effective annualized tax rate of 31.8%. In the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, income tax
expense was $1.3 million, which reflects an estimated effective annualized tax rate of 31.0%. The increase in the estimated effective annualized tax rate is due to the estimated tax impact of share-based compensation in 2006.

Net Income.Net income increased $0.7 million to $3.5 million in the thirteen week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to net income of $2.9 million in
the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to an increase in operating income of $0.8 million driven by an increase in revenues of $8.4 million and improved labor and operating costs as a percentage of revenues.

Twenty-Six Week Period Ended June 25, 2005 Compared to Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 1, 2006

The following are highlights of our financial performance for the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to the twenty-six week period ended
June 25, 2005:



| |  |  | Revenues increased 15.2% to $148.4 million from $128.8 million
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Comparable restaurant sales increased 3.4%
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Operating income increased 23.6% to $8.5 million from $6.9 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Net income increased 29.6% to $5.8 million from $4.5 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.40 from $0.32
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------

The following
table sets forth our operating results from our unaudited consolidated statements of income.



|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------- |  | ------------ | - |  | - | ------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                    |  | Twenty-six week period ended |        
|                                    |  | June 25, 2005                |         |  | July 1, 2006 |  
|                                    |  | (in thousands)               |        
|Revenues                            |  | $                            | 128,771 |  | 100.0        | % |  | $ | 148,369 |   |  | 100.0 | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Restaurant operating costs          |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Food and beverage                   |  |                              | 37,687  |  | 29.3         | % |  |   | 43,386  |   |  | 29.2  | % 
|Labor                               |  |                              | 40,736  |  | 31.6         | % |  |   | 46,537  |   |  | 31.4  | % 
|Operating                           |  |                              | 19,014  |  | 14.8         | % |  |   | 21,623  |   |  | 14.6  | % 
|Occupancy                           |  |                              | 11,666  |  | 9.0          | % |  |   | 13,514  |   |  | 9.1   | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Total restaurant operating costs    |  |                              | 109,103 |  | 84.7         | % |  |   | 125,060 |   |  | 84.3  | % 
|General and administrative expenses |  |                              | 6,903   |  | 5.4          | % |  |   | 7,954   |   |  | 5.4   | % 
|Restaurant pre-opening costs        |  |                              | 1,288   |  | 1.0          | % |  |   | 1,485   |   |  | 1.0   | % 
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                              | 4,613   |  | 3.6          | % |  |   | 5,384   |   |  | 3.6   | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Total costs and expenses            |  |                              | 121,907 |  | 94.7         | % |  |   | 139,883 |   |  | 94.3  | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Operating income                    |  |                              | 6,864   |  | 5.3          | % |  |   | 8,486   |   |  | 5.7   | % 
|Interest expense (income), net      |  |                              | 323     |  | 0.2          | % |  |   | (90     | ) |  | (0.1  | )%
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Income before income taxes          |  |                              | 6,541   |  | 5.1          | % |  |   | 8,576   |   |  | 5.8   | % 
|Income tax expense                  |  |                              | 2,028   |  | 1.6          | % |  |   | 2,727   |   |  | 1.9   | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   
|Net income                          |  | $                            | 4,513   |  | 3.5          | % |  | $ | 5,849   |   |  | 3.9   | % 
|                                    |  |                              |         |  |              |   |  |   |         |   |  |       |   



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenues and Restaurant Operating Costs

The following table sets forth revenues and restaurant operating costs, including food and beverage, labor, operating and occupancy costs, from our unaudited consolidated statements of income.



|                                 |  |                              |         |                |   |         |  |   |        |  |      |  
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------- | -------------- | - | ------- |  | - | ------ |  | ---- | -
|                                 |  | Twenty-six week period ended |         | Change         |  
|                                 |  | June 25, 2005                |         | July 1, 2006   |   | $       |  | % |       
|                                 |  |                              |         | (in thousands) |   |         |  |   |       
|Revenues                         |  | $                            | 128,771 |                | $ | 148,369 |  | $ | 19,598 |  | 15.2 | %
|                                 |  |                              |         |                |   |         |  |   |        |  |      |  
|Restaurant operating costs       |  |                              |         |                |   |         |  |   |        |  |      |  
|Food and beverage                |  | $                            | 37,687  |                | $ | 43,386  |  | $ | 5,699  |  | 15.1 | %
|Labor                            |  |                              | 40,736  |                |   | 46,537  |  |   | 5,801  |  | 14.2 | %
|Operating                        |  |                              | 19,014  |                |   | 21,623  |  |   | 2,609  |  | 13.7 | %
|Occupancy                        |  |                              | 11,666  |                |   | 13,514  |  |   | 1,848  |  | 15.8 | %
|                                 |  |                              |         |                |   |         |  |   |        |  |      |  
|Total restaurant operating costs |  | $                            | 109,103 |                | $ | 125,060 |  | $ | 15,957 |  | 14.6 | %
|                                 |  |                              |         |                |   |         |  |   |        |  |      |  

Revenues. Revenues increased $19.6 million, or 15.2%, to $148.4 million in the twenty-six week period
ended July 1, 2006 from $128.8 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in comparable restaurant sales of 3.4% coupled with revenues generated by the
restaurants not included in the comparable base. The comparable restaurant sales increase was primarily the result of increased guest counts.

Food and
Beverage Costs. Food and beverage costs increased $5.7 million, or 15.1%, to $43.4 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from $37.7 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was
primarily attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Food and beverage costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 29.2% in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from 29.3% in the twenty-six
week period ended June 25, 2005.

Labor Costs. Labor costs increased $5.8 million, or 14.2%, to $46.5 million in the twenty-six week
period ended July 1, 2006, from $40.7 million in twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Labor costs as a percentage of
revenues decreased to 31.4 % in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from 31.6% in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. The decrease in labor costs as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to the leverage of
higher revenues on fixed labor costs for the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006, coupled with lower workers compensation expense resulting from lower average claims incurred by restaurants.

Operating Costs. Operating costs increased $2.6 million, or 13.7%, to $21.6 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from $19.0 million
in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Operating costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 14.6% in the
twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from 14.8% in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005 primarily due to the leverage of higher revenues on fixed operating costs in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006.

Occupancy Costs. Occupancy costs increased $1.8 million, or 15.8%, to $13.5 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from
$11.7 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to the seven company-owned restaurants opened since June 25, 2005. Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues increased to 9.1% in the twenty-six week period
ended July 1, 2006 from 9.0% in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. The increase is primarily due to an increase in common area maintenance costs and property tax expense for the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006

General and Administrative Expenses, Restaurant Pre-Opening Costs and Depreciation and Amortization

The following table sets forth general and administrative expenses, restaurant pre-opening costs, and depreciation and amortization from our unaudited consolidated
statements of income.



|                                    |  |                              |       |                |   |       |  |   |       |  |      |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | -------------- | - | ----- |  | - | ----- |  | ---- | -
|                                    |  | Twenty-six week period ended |       | Change         |  
|                                    |  | June 25, 2005                |       | July 1, 2006   |   | $     |  | % |      
|                                    |  |                              |       | (in thousands) |   |       |  |   |      
|General and administrative expenses |  | $                            | 6,903 |                | $ | 7,954 |  | $ | 1,051 |  | 15.2 | %
|Restaurant pre-opening costs        |  |                              | 1,288 |                |   | 1,485 |  |   | 197   |  | 15.3 | %
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                              | 4,613 |                |   | 5,384 |  |   | 771   |  | 16.7 | %

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or
15.2%, to $8.0 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from $6.9 million in the thirteen week period ended June 25, 2005. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 5.4% in both the twenty-six week
period ended July 1, 2006 and June 25, 2005. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the increase in the number of restaurants coupled with share-based compensation expenses of $0.5 million recognized as a
result of the adoption of SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2006.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Restaurant Pre-Opening Costs. Restaurant pre-opening costs increased $0.2 million, or 15.3%, to $1.5 million
in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from $1.3 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to the timing of restaurant openings and restaurants under construction in the twenty-six week period ended
July 1, 2006 compared to the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization increased $0.8 million, or 16.7%, to $5.4 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 from $4.6 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. The increase was primarily due to the addition of seven
company-owned restaurants since June 25, 2005.

Interest Expense (Income), Net, Income Tax Expense and Net Income

The following table sets forth interest expense (income), net, income tax expense and net income from our unaudited consolidated statements of income.



|                               |  |                              |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | -------------- | ------ | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | ---- | -
|                               |  | Twenty-six week period ended |       |                | Change |      
|                               |  | June 25, 2005                |       | July 1, 2006   |        |       | $ |  |   | %     |  
|                               |  |                              |       | (in thousands) |        |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Interest expense (income), net |  | $                            | 323   |                | $      | (90   | ) |  | $ | (413  | ) |  | NM   | *
|                               |  |                              |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|Income before income taxes     |  | $                            | 6,541 |                | $      | 8,576 |   |  | $ | 2,035 |   |  | 31.1 | %
|Income tax expense             |  |                              | 2,028 |                |        | 2,727 |   |  |   | 699   |   |  | 34.5 | %
|                               |  |                              |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|Net income                     |  | $                            | 4,513 |                | $      | 5,849 |   |  | $ | 1,336 |   |  | 29.6 | %
|                               |  |                              |       |                |        |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  



|* | Percentage is non-meaningful
|- | ----------------------------

Interest Expense (Income),
Net. Interest income, net of interest expense, was $90,000 in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 compared to interest expense of $0.3 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. This was primarily
due to the paydown of our revolving credit facility in December 2005, coupled with interest income earned on our invested cash and cash equivalents.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $2.7 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006, which reflects an estimated effective annualized tax rate of approximately 31.8%. In the twenty-six week period
ended June 25, 2005, income tax expense was $2.0 million, which reflects an estimated effective annualized tax rate of 31.0%. The increase in the estimated effective annualized tax rate is due to the estimated tax impact of share-based
compensation in 2006.

Net Income.Net income increased $1.3 million to $5.8 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006
compared to net income of $4.5 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005, primarily due to an increase in operating income of $1.6 million driven by an increase in revenues of $19.6 million, and improved food and beverage, labor
and operating costs as a percentage of revenues.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary cash needs have been for new restaurant construction, working capital and general corporate purposes, including payments under credit facilities. Our main sources of cash have been issuance of common
stock, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under credit facilities.

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash and
cash equivalents from our unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows:



|                                          |  |                              |         |   |              |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------ | - | ------- | -
|                                          |  | Twenty-six week period ended |        
|                                          |  | June 25, 2005                |         |   | July 1, 2006 |  
|                                          |  | (in thousands)               |        
|Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $                            | 10,668  |   |              | $ | 14,891  |  
|Net cash used in investing activities     |  |                              | (10,868 | ) |              |   | (10,939 | )
|Net cash provided by financing activities |  |                              | 262     |   |              |   | 639     |  
|                                          |  |                              |         |   |              |   |         |  
|Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |  | $                            | 62      |   |              | $ | 4,591   |  
|                                          |  |                              |         |   |              |   |         |  

Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.9 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006
compared to $10.7 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. Net cash provided by operating activities in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006 was primarily due net income of $5.8 million and an increase in accrued
expenses of $3.4 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $10.9 million in both the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006
and June 25, 2005. We use cash for tenant improvements and equipment to open new restaurants and to upgrade and add capacity to existing restaurants. Net cash used in investing activities will vary based on the number of new restaurants under
construction and the expansion of existing restaurant capacity during the period. Purchases of property and equipment also include purchases of information technology systems and expenditures relating to our corporate headquarters.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.6 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 1, 2006. The net cash provided by financing activities was
primarily a result of proceeds from stock options exercised of $0.5 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $0.3 million, partially offset by payments made on capital lease obligations of $0.2 million. Net cash provided by
financing activities was $0.3 million in the twenty-six week period ended June 25, 2005. The net cash provided by financing activities was primarily a result of an increase in book overdraft of $0.5 million, off-set by payments made on capital
lease obligations of $0.2 million.

As of July 1, 2006, we had no borrowings on our $50.0 million revolving credit facility. The revolving credit
facility agreement also provides for bank guarantees under standby letter of credit arrangements in the normal course of business operations. As of July 1, 2006, the maximum exposure under these standby letters of credit was $1.5 million. As of
July 1, 2006, there were no amounts drawn upon these letters of credit and we had $48.5 million available under our revolving credit facility.

Under
our revolving credit facility, we are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants, including an adjusted leverage ratio, a consolidated cash flow ratio and growth capital expenditures limitation. We were in compliance with these
covenants as of July 1, 2006.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

We believe the net cash provided by operating activities and funds available from our revolving credit facility will be
sufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, including restaurant construction, pre-opening costs and potential initial operating losses related to new restaurant openings, for at least the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our
significant accounting policies are those that we believe are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates
about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe our critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are the following:

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and leasehold
improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment consists primarily of restaurant equipment, furniture, fixtures and smallwares. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13, Accounting for
Leases (SFAS 13), as amended, or the estimated useful life of the asset. As discussed in SFAS 13, the lease term includes any period covered by a renewal option where the renewal is reasonably assured because failure to renew
the lease would impose an economic penalty to the lessee. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Estimated useful lives are generally as follows: equipment3 to 10 years; furniture and
fixtures5 to 10 years and leasehold improvements7 to 30 years. Judgments and estimates made by us related to the expected useful lives of these assets are affected by factors such as changes in economic conditions and changes in
operating performance. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets

We review property and equipment (which includes leasehold improvements) for impairment when events or circumstances indicate
these assets might be impaired. We test impairment using historical cash flow and other relevant facts and circumstances as the primary basis for our estimates of future cash flows. The analysis is performed at the restaurant level for indicators of
permanent impairment. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is
measured by calculating the amount by which the asset-carrying amount exceeds its fair value. The determination of asset fair value is also subject to significant judgment. This process requires the use of estimates and assumptions, which are
subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite Lived Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not subject to
amortization. However, such assets must be tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable and at least annually. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other
indefinite lived assets, market values and projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are used to determine the fair value of the respective assets. The estimated future cash flows were projected using significant
assumptions, including future revenues and expenses. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

Insurance Liability

We maintain various insurance policies for workers compensation, employee health,
general liability, and property damage. Pursuant to those policies, we are responsible for losses up to certain limits and are required to estimate a liability that represents our ultimate exposure for aggregate losses below those limits. This
liability is based on managements estimates of the ultimate costs to be incurred to settle known claims and claims not reported as of the balance sheet date. Our estimated liability is not discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and
factors, including historical trends, actuarial assumptions, and economic conditions. If actual trends differ from our estimates, our financial results could be impacted.

Income Taxes

We have accounted for, and currently account for, income taxes in accordance with SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Statement establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprises activities during the current and preceding years.
It requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. We recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial
statements or tax returns. In the event the future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and liabilities result in a net deferred tax asset, an evaluation is made of the probability of being able
to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion of or all deferred tax asset will not be realized. The realization of such
net deferred tax asset will generally depend on whether we will have sufficient taxable income of an appropriate character within the carryforward period permitted by the tax law. Without sufficient taxable income to offset the deductible amounts
and carryforwards, the related tax benefits will expire unused. We have evaluated both positive and negative evidence in making a determination as to whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. Measurement of deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. No deferred tax asset valuation allowance has been recorded as of July 1, 2006.

Operating Leases

Rent expense for our operating leases, which generally have escalating rentals over the term of the lease, is
recorded using the straight-line method over the lease term as defined in SFAS 13. The lease term is determined to commence on the date which is normally when the property is ready for normal tenant improvements (build-out period), when no rent
payments are typically due under the terms of the lease. The difference between rent expense using the straight-line method and minimum rent paid is recorded as a deferred rent liability and is included in the consolidated balance sheets.

Share-Based Compensation

We account for
share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. We adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method as of January 1, 2006, the first day of our fiscal year 2006. Under SFAS 123R,
we determined the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as the Companys assumptions regarding a number of
complex and subjective variables, including but not limited to the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards,



15



---

##### Table of Contents

life of the option, expected term of the option, the estimated forfeiture rate, the risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield.



|ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Our
market risk exposures are related to our cash and cash equivalents. We invest any excess cash in highly liquid short-term investments with maturities of less than one year. These investments are not held for trading or other speculative purposes.
Changes in interest rates affect the investment income we earn on our investments and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations.

Under
our revolving credit facility, we are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on borrowings, which bear interest at the financial institutions prime rate plus a margin of up to 0.75% or the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 0.75%
to 1.75%, with margins determined by certain financial ratios. At our option, we may convert loans under our revolving credit facility from one type of rate to the other. As of July 1, 2006, we had no outstanding borrowings. Loans under our
revolving credit facility mature on July 23, 2009.



|ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|------- | -----------------------

Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely
manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------

Occasionally, we are a defendant in litigation
arising in the ordinary course of our business, including claims resulting from slip and fall accidents, employment related claims and claims from guests or employees alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational
concerns. None of these types of litigation, most of which are covered by insurance, has had a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or cash flows.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

Restaurant companies have been the target of
class-actions and other lawsuits alleging, among other things, violation of federal and state law.

We are subject to a variety of claims arising
in the ordinary course of our business brought by or on behalf of our customers or employees, including personal injury claims, contract claims, and employment-related claims. In recent years, a number of restaurant companies have been subject to
lawsuits, including class-action lawsuits, alleging violations of federal and state law regarding workplace, employment and similar matters. A number of these lawsuits have resulted in the payment of substantial damages by the defendants. Similar
lawsuits have been instituted against us from time to time. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are ultimately determined to be liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our
operations and hurt our performance. A judgment significantly in excess of our insurance coverage for any claims could materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, and adverse publicity resulting from these
allegations may materially adversely affect our business. We may incur substantial damages and expenses resulting from lawsuits, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our ability to expand our restaurant base is influenced by factors beyond our control and therefore we may not be able to achieve our planned growth.

Our growth strategy depends in large part on our ability to open new restaurants and to operate these restaurants profitably. Delays or failures
in opening new restaurants could impair our ability to meet our growth objectives. We have in the past experienced delays in restaurant openings and may experience similar delays in the future. Our ability to expand our business successfully will
depend upon numerous factors, including:



| |  |  | hiring, training and retaining skilled management, chefs and other qualified personnel to open, manage and operate new restaurants;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | locating and securing a sufficient number of suitable new restaurant sites in new and existing markets on acceptable lease terms;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | managing the amount of time and construction and development costs associated with the opening of new restaurants;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | obtaining adequate financing for the construction of new restaurants;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | securing governmental approvals and permits required to open new restaurants in a timely manner, if at all;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | successfully promoting our new restaurants and competing in the markets in which our new restaurants are located; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | general economic conditions.
| | - |  | ----------------------------

Some of these factors are beyond our
control. We may not be able to achieve our expansion goals and our new restaurants may not be able to achieve operating results similar to those of our existing restaurants.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Unexpected expenses and low market acceptance could adversely affect the profitability of restaurants that we open
in new markets.

Our growth strategy includes opening restaurants in markets where we have little or no operating experience and in which potential
customers may not be familiar with our restaurants. The success of these new restaurants may be affected by different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns, and our ability to generate market awareness and
acceptance of the McCormick & Schmicks brand. As a result, we may incur costs related to the opening, operation and promotion of these new restaurants that are greater than those incurred in other areas. Even though we may incur
substantial additional costs with these new restaurants, they may attract fewer customers than our more established restaurants in existing markets. Sales at restaurants we open in new markets may take longer to reach our average annual sales, if at
all. As a result, the results of operations at our new restaurants may be inferior to those of our existing restaurants. We may not be able to profitably open restaurants in new markets.

Our growth may strain our infrastructure and resources, which could slow our development of new restaurants and adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants.

We opened seven company-owned restaurants in 2005 and we plan to open eight in 2006 and ten in 2007. Our expansion and our future growth may strain our restaurant
management systems and resources, financial controls and information systems. Those demands on our infrastructure and resources may also adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. If we fail to continue to improve our
infrastructure or to manage other factors necessary for us to meet our expansion objectives, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited, which could adversely impact our growth.

Changes in our operating plans,
acceleration of our expansion plans, lower than anticipated sales, increased expenses or other events described in this section may require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. Financing may not be available on acceptable terms and our
failure to raise capital when needed could negatively impact our growth and our financial condition and results of operations. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may
involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate our business.

Our operations are susceptible to
changes in food availability and costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our profitability depends significantly on our ability
to anticipate and react to changes in seafood costs. We rely on local, regional and national suppliers to provide our seafood. Increases in distribution costs or sale prices or failure to perform by these suppliers could cause our food costs to
increase. We could also experience significant short-term disruptions in our supply if a significant supplier failed to meet its obligations. The supply of seafood is more volatile than other types of food. The type, variety, quality and price of
seafood is subject to factors beyond our control, including weather, governmental regulation, availability and seasonality, each of which may affect our food costs or cause a disruption in our supply. Changes in the price or availability of certain
types of seafood could affect our ability to offer a broad menu and price offering to customers and could materially adversely affect our profitability.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly and could fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors due to seasonality and other factors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly because of several factors, including:



| |  |  | our ability to achieve and manage our planned expansion;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to achieve market acceptance, particularly in new markets;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to raise capital in the future;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the availability and costs of food;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the loss of key management personnel;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | the concentration of our restaurants in specific geographic areas;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to protect our name and logo and other proprietary information;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in consumer preferences or discretionary spending;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fluctuations in the number of visitors or business travelers to downtown locations;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | health concerns about seafood or other foods;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to attract, motivate and retain qualified employees;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increases in labor costs;
| | - |  | -------------------------



| |  |  | the impact of federal, state or local government regulations relating to our employees or the sale or preparation of food and the sale of alcoholic beverages;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the impact of litigation;
| | - |  | -------------------------



| |  |  | the effect of competition in the restaurant industry; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | economic trends generally.
| | - |  | --------------------------

Our business also is subject to seasonal
fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the second and fourth quarter of each year. As a result, our quarterly and annual operating results and restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of
seasonality and the factors discussed above. Accordingly, results for any one fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future
period may decrease. Our operating results may also fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that event, the price of our common stock would likely decrease.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

A decline in visitors or business travelers to downtown areas where our restaurants are located could negatively
affect our restaurant sales.

Many of our restaurants are located in downtown areas. We depend on both local residents and business travelers to
frequent these locations. If the number of visitors to downtown areas declines due to economic or other conditions, changes in consumer preferences, changes in discretionary consumer spending or for other reasons, our revenues could decline
significantly and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we lose the services of any of our key management personnel our business
could suffer.

We depend on the services of our key management personnel, including Saed Mohseni, our chief executive officer, and Douglas L.
Schmick, our president. If we lose the services of any members of our senior management or key personnel for any reason, we may be unable to replace them with qualified personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and
growth. We do not carry key person life insurance on any of our executive officers.

Many of our restaurants are concentrated in local or regional
areas and, as a result, we are sensitive to economic and other trends and developments in these areas.

We operate five restaurants in the Seattle,
Washington area, seven in the Portland, Oregon area and ten in California; our East Coast restaurants are concentrated in and around Washington, D.C. As a result, adverse economic conditions, weather and labor markets in any of these areas could
have a material adverse effect on our overall results of operations.

In addition, given our geographic concentrations, negative publicity regarding any of
our restaurants in these areas could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations, as could other regional occurrences such as local strikes, oil spills, terrorist attacks, energy shortages or increases in energy prices, droughts or
earthquakes or other natural disasters.

Our success depends on our ability to protect our proprietary information. Failure to protect our
trademarks, service marks or trade secrets could adversely affect our business.

Our business prospects depend in part on our ability to develop
favorable consumer recognition of the McCormick & Schmicks name. Although McCormick & Schmicks, M&S Grill and other of our service marks are federally registered trademarks with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, our trademarks could be imitated in ways that we cannot prevent. In addition, we rely on trade secrets, proprietary know-how, concepts and recipes. Our methods of protecting this information may not be adequate, however, and others
could independently develop similar know-how or obtain access to our trade secrets, know-how, concepts and recipes. Moreover, we may face claims of misappropriation or infringement of third parties rights that could interfere with our use of
our proprietary know-how, concepts, recipes or trade secrets. Defending these claims may be costly and, if unsuccessful, may prevent us from continuing to use this proprietary information in the future, and may result in a judgment or monetary
damages.

We do not maintain confidentiality and non-competition agreements with all of our executives, key personnel or suppliers. If competitors
independently develop or otherwise obtain access to our know-how, concepts, recipes or trade secrets, the appeal of our restaurants could be reduced and our business could be harmed.

Our current insurance policies may not provide adequate levels of coverage against all claims.

We believe we
maintain insurance coverage that is customary for businesses of our size and type. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not commercially reasonable to insure. These losses, if they
occur, could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Expanding our restaurant base by opening new restaurants
in existing markets could reduce the business of our existing restaurants.

Our growth strategy includes opening restaurants in markets in which we
already have existing restaurants. We may be unable to attract enough customers to the new restaurants for them to operate at a profit. Even if we are able to attract enough customers to the new restaurants to operate them at a profit, those
customers may be former customers of one of our existing restaurants in that market and the opening of new restaurants in the existing market could reduce the revenue of our existing restaurants in that market.

We may not be able to successfully integrate into our business the operations of restaurants that we acquire, which may adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.

We may seek to selectively acquire existing restaurants and integrate them into our business operations.
Achieving the expected benefits of any restaurants that we acquire will depend in large part on our ability to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired restaurants and personnel in a timely and efficient manner. The risks involved in
such restaurant acquisitions and integration include:



| |  |  | challenges and costs associated with the acquisition and integration of restaurant operations located in markets where we have limited or no experience;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | possible disruption to our business as a result of the diversion of managements attention from its normal operational responsibilities and duties; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | consolidation of the corporate, information technology, accounting and administrative infrastructure and resources of the acquired restaurants into our business.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Future acquisitions of existing restaurants, which may be accomplished through a cash purchase transaction or the issuance of our equity
securities, or a combination of both, could result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and impairment charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could harm our
business and financial condition.

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, or realize the anticipated benefits, of any restaurant that
we acquire. If we cannot overcome the challenges and risks that we face in integrating the operations of newly acquired restaurants, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Negative publicity concerning food quality, health and other issues and costs or liabilities resulting from litigation may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.

We are sometimes the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging illness, injury or other food quality,
health or operational concerns. Litigation or



18



---

##### Table of Contents

adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may materially and adversely affect us or our restaurants, regardless of whether the allegations are valid
or whether we are liable. Further, these claims may divert our financial and management resources from revenue-generating activities and business operations.

Health concerns relating to the consumption of seafood or other foods could affect consumer preferences and could negatively impact our results of operations.

We may lose customers based on health concerns about the consumption of seafood or negative publicity concerning food quality, illness and injury generally, such as negative publicity concerning the accumulation of
mercury or other carcinogens in seafood, e-coli, mad cow or foot-and-mouth disease, publication of government or industry findings about food products served by us or other health concerns or operating issues stemming from
one of our restaurants. In addition, our operational controls and training may not be fully effective in preventing all food-borne illnesses. Some food-borne illness incidents could be caused by food suppliers and transporters and would be outside
of our control. Any negative publicity, health concerns or specific outbreaks of food-borne illnesses attributed to one or more of our restaurants, or the perception of an outbreak, could result in a decrease in guest traffic to our restaurants and
could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Changes in consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could negatively impact our
results of operations.

The restaurant industry is characterized by the introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer
preferences, tastes and purchasing habits. Our continued success depends in part upon the popularity of seafood and the style of dining we offer. Shifts in consumer preferences away from this cuisine or dining style could materially and adversely
affect our operating results. Our success will depend in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences, tastes and purchasing habits, and to other factors affecting the restaurant industry, including new market
entrants and demographic changes. If we change our concept and menu to respond to changes in consumer tastes or dining patterns, we may lose customers who do not like the new concept or menu, and may not be able to attract a sufficient new customer
base to produce the revenue needed to make the restaurant profitable. Our success also depends to a significant extent on numerous factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, disposable consumer income and
consumer confidence. Adverse changes in these factors could reduce guest traffic or impose practical limits on pricing, either of which could harm our results of operations.

Labor shortages or increases in labor costs could slow our growth or harm our business.

Our success depends
in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including regional operational managers and regional chefs, restaurant general managers and executive chefs, necessary to continue our operations
and keep pace with our growth. Qualified individuals are in short supply and competition for these employees is intense. If we are unable to recruit and retain sufficient qualified individuals, our business and our growth could be adversely
affected. Additionally, competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages, which could result in higher labor costs. If our labor costs increase, our results of operations will be negatively affected.

We may incur costs or liabilities and lose revenue, and our growth strategy may be adversely impacted, as a result of government regulation.

Our restaurants are subject to various federal, state and local government regulations, including those relating to employees, the preparation and sale of food and the
sale of alcoholic beverages. These regulations affect our restaurant operations and our ability to open new restaurants.

Each of our restaurants must
obtain licenses from regulatory authorities to sell liquor, beer and wine, and each restaurant must obtain a food service license from local health authorities. Each liquor license must be renewed annually and may be revoked at any time for cause,
including violation by us or our employees of any laws and regulations relating to the minimum drinking age, advertising, wholesale purchasing and inventory control. In certain jurisdictions where we operate the number of alcoholic beverage licenses
available is limited and licenses are traded at market prices.

The failure to maintain our food and liquor licenses and other required licenses, permits
and approvals could adversely affect our operating results. Difficulties or failure in obtaining the required licenses and approvals could delay or result in our decision to cancel the opening of new restaurants.

We are subject to dram shop statutes in some states. These statutes generally allow a person injured by an intoxicated person to recover damages from an
establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. A judgment substantially in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our operating results and financial condition.

Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationship with our employees and affect operating costs. These laws include minimum wage requirements, overtime pay,
unemployment tax rates, workers compensation rates, and citizenship requirements. Additional government-imposed increases in minimum wages, overtime pay, paid leaves of absence and mandated health benefits, increased tax reporting and tax
payment requirements for employees who receive gratuities or a reduction in the number of states that allow tips to be credited toward minimum wage requirements could harm our operating results and financial condition.

The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment. Although our restaurants are
designed to be accessible to the disabled, we could be required to make modifications to our restaurants to provide service to, or make reasonable accommodations for, disabled persons.

Our operations and profitability are susceptible to the effects of violence, war and economic trends.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war and U.S. military reactions to such attacks may negatively affect our operations and an investment in our shares of common stock. The terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. on
September 11, 2001 led to a temporary interruption in deliveries from some of our suppliers and, we believe, contributed to the decline in average annual comparable restaurant sales in 2001 and 2002.

Future acts of violence or war could cause a decrease in travel and in consumer confidence, decrease consumer spending, result in increased volatility in the United
States and worldwide financial markets and economy, or result in an economic recession in the United States or abroad. They could also impact consumer leisure habits, for example, by increasing time spent watching television news programs at home,
and may reduce the number of times consumers dine out, which could adversely impact our revenue. Any of these occurrences could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations, and may result in the volatility of the market price for
our securities and on the future price of our securities.

Terrorist attacks could also directly impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers,
and attacks or armed conflicts may make travel and the transportation of our supplies and products more difficult and more expensive and ultimately affect our revenues.

We may not be able to compete successfully with other restaurants, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, service, location, food quality, ambiance and the overall dining experience. Our competitors



19



---

##### Table of Contents

include a large and diverse group of restaurant chains and individual restaurants that range from independent local operators to well capitalized national
restaurant companies. Some of our competitors have been in existence for a substantially longer period than we have and may be better established in the markets where our restaurants are or may be located. Some of our competitors may have
substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. If our restaurants are unable to compete successfully with other restaurants in new and existing markets, our results of operations will be adversely affected. We also
compete with other restaurants for experienced management personnel and hourly employees, and with other restaurants and retail establishments for quality restaurant sites.



|ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

None



|ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|------- | -------------------------------

None



|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

Our Annual
Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 15, 2006 in Portland, Oregon. A total of 13,654,001 shares were present or represented by proxy at the meeting, representing approximately 96% of the shares outstanding as of the March 31, 2006
record date. The only matter submitted for a vote was the election of nine nominees to serve as directors. Each of our incumbent directors was re-elected as follows:



|                          |  |            |  |          
|------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------
|                          |  | For        |  | Withheld 
|Douglas L. Schmick        |  | 12,793,744 |  | 860,257  
|Saed Mohseni              |  | 13,609,123 |  | 44,878   
|Lee M. Cohn               |  | 8,751,744  |  | 4,902,257
|Elliott H. Jurgensen, Jr. |  | 12,150,885 |  | 1,503,116
|J. Rice Edmonds           |  | 13,615,907 |  | 38,094   
|David B. Pittaway         |  | 13,492,207 |  | 161,794  
|Harold O. Rosser          |  | 13,503,907 |  | 150,094  
|Fortunato N. Valenti      |  | 12,681,219 |  | 972,782  
|Justin B. Wender          |  | 8,406,703  |  | 5,247,298



|ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION
|------- | -----------------

None



|ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS
|------- | --------

EXHIBITS.



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | 
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|3.2  |  | Bylaws of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.2 and 3.2a to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-114977).                                                                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|4.1  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2001, by and among McCormick & Schmick Holdings LLC, Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. II, L.P.,
Castle Harlan Partners III, L.P. and certain other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our registration statement on Form S-1, file No. 333-114977).
|     | 
|10.1 |  | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, as amended.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|     | 
|10.2 |  | First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                               
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                               
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|32.2 |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                              



20



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



McCORMICK & SCHMICKS SEAFOOD RESTAURANTS, INC.By:

/s/ SAED MOHSENISaed MohseniChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)By:

/s/ EMANUEL N. HILARIOEmanuel N. HilarioChief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)


Date: August 9, 2006



21



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBITS.



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     | 
|3.1  |  | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-114977).                                                                                                                                                        
|     | 
|3.2  |  | Bylaws of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.2 and 3.2a to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-114977).                                                                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|4.1  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2001, by and among McCormick & Schmick Holdings LLC, Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. II, L.P., Castle Harlan
Partners III, L.P. and certain other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our registration statement on Form S-1, file No. 333-114977).
|     | 
|10.1 |  | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, as amended.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|     | 
|10.2 |  | First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.                                                                                                                                               
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.                                                                                                                                               
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|32.2 |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                              



22