alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 515 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the importation of certain low-level radioactive 

waste into the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 515 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Radioactive Import 

3 Deterrence Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF IMPORTATION. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 19 of the Atomic Energy 

6 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2015 et seq.) is amended by in7 serting after section 276 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 277. IMPORTATION OF LOW-LEVEL RADIO9 ACTIVE WASTE.— 

10 ‘‘a. Except as provided in subsection b. or c., the 

11 Commission shall not issue a license authorizing the im12 portation into the United States of— 

13 ‘‘(1) low-level radioactive waste (as defined in 

14 section 2 of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy 

15 Act (42 U.S.C. 2021b)); or 

16 ‘‘(2) specific radioactive waste streams exempt17 ed from regulation by the Commission under section 

18 10 of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act 

19 (42 U.S.C. 2021j). 

20 ‘‘b. Subsection a. shall not apply to— 

21 ‘‘(1) low-level radioactive waste being returned 

22 to a United States Government or military facility 

23 which is authorized to possess the material; or 

24 ‘‘(2) low-level radioactive waste resulting from 

25 the use in a foreign country of nuclear material ob26 tained by the foreign user from an entity in the 
3 

•HR 515 EH

1 United States that is being returned to the United 

2 States for management and disposal. 

3 ‘‘c. The President may waive the prohibition under 

4 this section and authorize the grant of a specific license 

5 to import materials prohibited under subsection a., under 

6 the rules of the Commission, only after a finding that such 

7 importation would meet an important national or inter8 national policy goal, such as the use of waste for research 

9 purposes. Such a waiver must specify the policy goal to 

10 be achieved, how it is to be achieved, and the amount of 

11 material to be imported. 

12 ‘‘d. A license not permitted under this section that 

13 was issued before the date of enactment of this section 

14 may continue in effect according to its terms, but may 

15 not be extended or amended with respect to the amount 

16 of material permitted to be imported.’’. 

17 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.—The table 

18 of contents for the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 is amended 
4 

•HR 515 EH

1 by inserting after the item relating to section 276 the fol2 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 277. Importation of low-level radioactive waste.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 515 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the importation of certain low-level 

radioactive waste into the United States.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2305

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Brian Michael Rohrick, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 2004 Filed: March 16, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Brian Rohrick appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 14-month prison term upon revocation of his supervised release for a felon-in-possession conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in imposing additional imprisonment and instead should have imposed inpatient drug treatment or at least a sentence within the Guidelines suggested range.-2- After a careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was well below the maximum sentence allowed under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Jasper , 338 F.3d 865, 867 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Rodriguez-Favela , 337 F.3d 1020, 1021 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.M., Appellant

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

WILLIAMSBURG, Salters, SC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0465

Issued: February 26, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 2, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a June 16, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0465.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the June 16, 2020 decision was December 13, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until February 2, 2021, more than 180 days after the June 16, 

2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0465 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0465 is dismissed.

Issued: February 26, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Sun Coast Industries, Inc.:
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-59652, 33-80238, 33-87538 and 33-87544) on Form S-8 of Sun Coast
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated August 22, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Sun Coast Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each of the
years in the three year period ended June 30, 1997, and the related schedule,
which appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Sun Coast
Industries, Inc.
 
                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
September 25, 1997
**Exhibit 32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




I,
      Fabrizzio Busso-Campana, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
      of Crystal International Travel Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:




·   the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended
      July 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




·   the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   
      July 2, 2007.


/s/
                Fabrizzio Busso-CampanaFabrizzio
                Busso-CampanaChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)




I,
      Peter
      Gallic, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




·   the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended
      July 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




·   the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   
      July 2, 2007.


/s/
                Peter GallicPeter
                GallicChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 11, 2011

| |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Randal Hardy
_____________________________
Randal Hardy
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Executive and Financial Officer







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Mineral Acquisition
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  period  ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  I, Simon Mu,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated:  November 14, 2005                  /s/ Simon Mu
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Simon Mu
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

G.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Brooklyn, NY, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0314

Issued: January 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On December 22, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a purported March 7, 2017 decision

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0314.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP 

issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal.2 The March 7, 2017 

decision was a preliminary overpayment determination, not a final adverse decision. As there is 

no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise 

jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0314 must be dismissed. 

Accordingly,

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0314 is dismissed.

Issued: January 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/                  William D.                  Kirkland                      William                  D. Kirkland  Chief                  Executive Officer and  Chief                  Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00416-CV

Fred Hoffman III#1662898

v.

Sgt. J. Muro and Lt. C. Garcia

On appeal from the

156th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-17-1009-CV-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant although he is exempt from payment due to his affidavit of his inability 

to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 14, 2018
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23.1

                             Donald L. Oliver P.E.
                               10341 Rocklock Way
                             Parker, Colorado 80134

                                                                    July 8, 1997

Territorial Resources, Inc.
734 7 Avenue SW
Suite 1345
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2P 3P8

Gentlemen:

I have prepared oil and gas reserve estimates for Territorial Resources, Inc.,
(the "Company"), for the Company's fiscal years ended March 31, 1994, 1995, and
1996.  Such estimates are included in the notes to the Financial Statements of
the Company which appear in the Company's annual report on form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1997.

I hereby consent to the identification in such Form 10-K of myself as the expert
which has prepared such estimates.  I also hereby consent to the inclusion of
this letter as an exhibit to such Form 10-K and registration statements.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Donald L. Oliver

                                             Donald L. Oliver
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 21-40229 Summary Calendar

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Jared Ulises Villarreal-De La Fuente, Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:20-CR-1048-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jared Ulises Villarreal-De La Fuente has moved for le ave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villarreal-De La Fuente has

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 10, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40229 Document: 00516125020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2021No. 21-40229

2 filed a response. We have reviewed co unsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Villarreal-De La Fuente’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessmen t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 21-40229 Document: 00516125020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2021
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Date:
    
    August 9, 2005/s/ N. MICHAEL DIONN. Michael Dion
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 62
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mrs. FieldsFamous Brands, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the 13 weeks ended March 29,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to each officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

May 13, 2008

 

 
| /s/ Stephen Russo               |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen Russo                   |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

 
| /s/ Steven K. Passey            |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Steven K. Passey                |
| Chief Financial Officer         |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906has been provided to Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC and will be retainedby Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.23
  Conexant
    Systems, Inc.
  Board of
    Directors Annual Remuneration
 As of
    August 10, 2010
  Cash
    Compensation
    Type

Amount(In dollars)AnnualBoard
    membership1


30,000Committee membership


7,500Committee Chair  Audit Committee


20,000Committee Chair  all other committees


15,000Lead Independent Director


15,000Meeting AttendanceBoard meeting


1,500Committee meeting


1,000           Equity
    Compensation
      
    an option to purchase 10,000 shares on the day of the
    Annual Meeting of Shareowners (First Annual
    Grant); and
    an option to purchase 10,000 shares six (6) months
    after the First Annual Grant (Second Annual Grant);    1




---



##### 



2
STATE v. Edward M. ALONZO

288PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 2019

Daniel K. Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Alonzo, Edward M.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Ellen A. Newby, Assistant Attorney General, Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of January 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of January 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 6th day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.