alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Mineral Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter period ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bing Zhao,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
      best of my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.




Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.




Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            /s/
                Bing
                Zhao
              Bing
                Zhao
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit
      31.1





CERTIFICATION








I,
      Luo
      Ken Yi, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of China Architectural Engineering, Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c.
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b.
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.








/s/
      Luo Ken Yi


Luo
      Ken
      Yi


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      14, 2007
Exhibit 10.11


                                 QUITCLAIM DEED

THIS DEED, made this 21 day of December, 2001
between New Allied Development Corporation
a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the
State of Colorado, grantor, and Western Continental, Inc.
a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the
State of Idaho, grantee, whose legal address is
P.O. Box 14006 Spokane, Washington 99214


         WITNESS, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of
$85,000.                                  Eighty Five Thousand Dollars,
the  receipt  and  sufficiency  of which is hereby  acknowledged,  has  remised,
released, sold and QUITCLAIMED, and by these presents does remise, release, sell
and QUITCLAIM  unto the grantee,  its  successors  and assign  forever,  all the
right,  title,  interest,  claim and demand  which the grantor has in and to the
real property,  together with improvements,  if any, situate, lying and being in
the Black Hawk * County of Gilpin and State of Colorado, described as follows:


        Mining  Claims;
        Prospector MS# 625
        All Nations MS# 18901
        Smith MS #292
        Pontiac MS #638
        Julia MS# 5446
        Susquehanna  MS# 5779
        East Star MS# 839
        Melas MS# 5445
        Slice MS# 5447
        South Bend MS# 7323
        Wain MS# 490
        Elsinor MS#807
        Peru MS# 903

also known by street and number as:
assessor's schedule or parcel number:

         TO HAVE AND TO HOLD  the  same,  together  with  all and  singular  the
appurtenances  and  privileges  thereunto  belonging,  or in  anywise  thereunto
appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of
the grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof
of the grantee, its successors and assigns forever.
         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the grantor has caused its  corporate  name to be
hereunto  subscribed by its  President,  and its  corporate  seal to be hereunto
affixed, attested by its Secretary, the day and year first above written.



                                          /s/ Erica J. Hull
                                          -----------------------------------
Attest:                                   Erica J. Hull

/s/ Judy Hanna                          By /s/ Judy Hanna
--------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Secretary                                 Secretary


         STATE OF TEXAS    )
                           ) ss.
         County of         )

The foregoing  instrument was acknowledged  before me this 18th day of February,
2002.

By  /s/ Erica Hull                  as      /s/ Erica Hull           President
and /s/ Judy Hanna                  as      /s/ Judy Hanna           Secretary
and /s/ Erica Hull                  as      /s/ Erica Hull           Corporation
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, PRESIDIO OF 

San Francisco, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0103

Issued: November 24, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On October 21, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a January 15, 2020 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0103.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the January 15, 2020 decision was July 13, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until October 21, 2020, more than 180 days after the

January 15, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0103 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0103 is dismissed.

Issued: November 24, 2020

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
Order entered October 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00708-CV

IN RE DAVID REISS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-02498

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans

Before the Court is relator’s October 22, 2020 “Agreed Motion to Extend 

Deadline in October 15, 2020 Opinion.” In the motion, relators ask this Court to 

grant a ten-day extension for the 191st Judicial District Court to rule on the

pending motions specified in our October 15, 2020 opinion and order. We 

GRANT the motion, and DIRECT the 191st Judicial District Court to file with the 

Clerk of the Court, by November 3, 2020, a certified copy of its orders evidencing 

compliance with this Court’s October 15, 2020 opinion and order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31996D0191

**96/191/EC: Council Decision of 26 February 1996 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on the protection of the Alps (Alpine Convention)***Official Journal L 061 , 12/03/1996 P. 0031 - 0031*

COUNCIL DECISION of 26 February 1996 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on the protection of the Alps (Alpine Convention) (96/191/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130s (1) in conjunction with Article 228 (2) and (3), first subparagraph, thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas the Commission has been involved, on behalf of the Community, in the negotiations aimed at the conclusion of the Convention on the protection of the Alps (Alpine Convention); whereas that Convention was signed on behalf of the Community on 7 November 1991;

Whereas the conclusion of the Convention forms part of the involvement of the Community in the international activities on the protection of the environment recommended in the Council resolution of 16 December 1992 on the fifth Programme of Action by the European Communities on the Environment;

Whereas the protection of the Alps is a major challenge to all Member States owing to the cross-frontier nature of the economic, social and ecological problems of the Alpine area;

Whereas the Community should therefore approve the said Convention;

Whereas, in order to permit the rapid entry into force of that Convention, it is necessary that the Member States which have signed the said Convention should complete as soon as possible their ratification, acceptance or approval procedures relating to the said Convention in order to enable the Community and those Member States to deposit their instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1 

The Convention on the protection of the Alps (Alpine Convention) is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community.

The text of the Convention is attached to this Decision.

Article 2 

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the Community, the instrument of approval with the Republic of Austria in accordance with Article 12 of the Convention.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 1996.

For the Council

The President

W. LUCCHETTI

(1) OJ No C 278, 5. 10. 1994, p. 8.

(2) OJ No C 18, 23. 1. 1995, p. 426.

(3) OJ No C 110, 2. 5. 1995, p. 1.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5181 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the preservation of 

the small arms production industrial base. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. ARCURI (for himself, Mr. OWENS, Mr. HUNTER, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

preservation of the small arms production industrial base. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Arms Competi5 tion and Innovation Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SMALL ARMS PRODUCTION INDUSTRIAL BASE. 

7 Section 2473 of title 10, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol10 lows: 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5181 IH

1 ‘‘(c) SMALL ARMS PRODUCTION INDUSTRIAL

2 BASE.—In this section, the term ‘small arms production 

3 industrial base’ means the persons and organizations that 

4 are engaged in the production or maintenance of small 

5 arms within the United States.’’; 

6 (2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) Pistols.’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(f) COMPETITIVE PROCEDURES.—If the Secretary 

11 determines under subsection (a) that the requirement to 

12 procure property or services described in subsection (b) 

13 for the Department of Defense from a firm in the small 

14 arms production industrial base is not necessary to pre15 serve such industrial base, any such procurement shall be 

16 awarded through the use of competitive procedures that 

17 afford such industrial base a fair opportunity to be consid18 ered for such procurement.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Robert
Rudman, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-K of Diatect International Corporation;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:




a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





May
      18, 2009
              /s/ Robert RudmanRobert
      RudmanPrincipal
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Michael D. Weaver,certify that:

 

1.               I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Otelco Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a.               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.              evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.               all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:   August 10, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Michael D. Weaver                          |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael  D. Weaver                             |
| *President & Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### THE STATE OF NEVADA, Ex Rel. LESTER E. MORFORD, III, Appellant, *v.*JACK FOGLIANI, Warden, Nevada State Penitentiary, Carson City, Ormsby County, Nevada, Respondent.

No. 4956

February 21, 1966

411 P.2d 122

[Rehearing denied March 21, 1966]

*John Squire Drendel,*and *Stanley H. Brown,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*Harvey Dickerson,*Attorney General, of Carson City, and *William J. Raggio,*District Attorney, Washoe County, of Reno, for Respondent.

*80OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an appeal from an order denying habeas corpus. Morford entered a plea of guilty to an open charge of murder. A three-judge court was appointed to hear evidence, determine degree, and impose sentence. NRS 200.080. Morford was adjudged guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death. That judgment was affirmed on appeal. Morford v. State, 80 Nev. 488, 395 P.2d 861 (1964). Some of the questions raised by the instant proceeding were resolved by that appeal and we are not persuaded that they should be reconsidered. Nor shall we consider the petitioner’s claim that the open charge of murder contained in the information does not authorize a finding of first degree murder. That claim comes too late, for it is not the function of post-conviction habeas to perform the office of demurrer, *81motion to quash, or appeal. Ex parte Boley, 76 Nev. 138, 350 P.2d 638 (1960). We shall only consider his contention that the judgment and sentence is unconstitutional and void in that he was charged by information rather than by indictment, for the constitutional validity of a conviction may be tested by habeas corpus. Dean v. Fogliani, 81 Nev. 541, 407 P.2d 580 (1965); Garnick v. Miller, 81 Nev. 372, 403 P.2d 850 (1965).

The petitioner claims that the Fifth Amendment to the federal constitution requires prosecution for a capital offense to be by grand jury indictment, and that we should consider that part of the Fifth Amendment applicable to state murder prosecutions. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled otherwise. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 4 S.Ct. 111, 292, 28 L.Ed. 232 (1884); Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541, 82 S.Ct. 955, 8 L.Ed.2d 98 (1961). There is no federal constitutional impediment to dispensing entirely with the grand jury in state prosecutions. Beck v. Washington, supra. Though petitioner suggests otherwise, we find nothing in Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964), or Murphy v. New York Waterfront Commission, 378 U.S. 52, 84 S.Ct. 1594, 12 L.Ed. 678 (1964), to intimate that the High Court is about to overturn Hurtado and Beck. The Malloy and Murphy opinions concern only a part of the Fifth Amendment — the privilege against self incrimination. Nor is Smith v. United States, 360 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 991, 3 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1959), apposite, for it was a federal prosecution.

Affirmed.

Badt, J., and Zenoff, D. J., concur.