alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John P. Longenecker, Ph.D., certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Favrille, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 14, 2007
| /s/ John P. Longenecker               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John P. Longenecker, Ph.D.            |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*       |

 

 

----
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Justin Ray Childs, Appellant

No. 06-12-00136-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

12F0310-102). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Justin Ray Childs, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 2, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 25, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11839

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 08-00005-CR-J-20JRK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TELMORE BARRINGTON DIXON,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 25, 2010)

Before HULL, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Donald Mairs, appointed counsel for Telmore Barrington Dixon in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dixon’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. State or Other JurisdictionSubsidiary
    
    of Incorporation or OrganizationAgranat Systems, Inc.
    
    MassachusettsAmphion Semiconductor (Asia) Ltd.
    
    Northern IrelandAmphion Semiconductor, Ltd.
    
    Northern IrelandAmphion Semiconductor, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaBrooktree Broadband Holding, Inc.
    
    DelawareBrooktree International Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsBrooktree Technologies Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsBrooktree Worldwide Sales Corporation
    
    CaliforniaChoice-Intersil Microsystems, Inc.
    
    KansasConexant Broadband Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaConexant Canada ULC
    
    CanadaConexant Digital Infotainment Limited
    
    United KingdomConexant Foreign Sales Corporation
    
    BarbadosConexant, Inc.
    
    DelawareConexant Korea Ltd.
    
    KoreaConexant Mauritius Ltd.
    
    MauritiusConexant Semiconductor (Canada), Inc.
    
    CanadaConexant Systems Asia Pacific Limited
    
    Hong Kong, Peoples Republic of ChinaConexant Systems France S.A.S.
    
    FranceConexant Systems Germany G.m.b.H.
    
    GermanyConexant Systems Holdings Limited
    
    United KingdomConexant Systems Iceland Ltd.
    
    IcelandConexant Systems, Inc.
    
    NevadaConexant Systems India Private Limited
    
    IndiaConexant Systems Israel (1996) Ltd.
    
    IsraelConexant Systems Israel Commercial Ltd.
    
    IsraelConexant Systems K.K.
    
    JapanConexant Systems Scandinavia AB
    
    SwedenConexant Systems Singapore Pte. Limited
    
    SingaporeConexant Systems Taiwan Co., Ltd.
    
    TaiwanConexant Systems UK Limited
    
    United KingdomConexant Systems Worldwide, Inc.
    
    DelawareFicon Technology, Inc.
    
    New JerseyGlobespan India Private Limited
    
    IndiaGlobespan International Corporation
    
    DelawareConexant
Systems Netherlands BV
    
    NetherlandsGlobespanVirata Limited
    
    UKiCompression, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaIstari Design, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSierra Imaging, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaNo
Wires Needed BV
    
    NetherlandsNPS Holding, Inc.
    
    MassachusettsNetplane Systems International, LLC
    
    DelawareTsqware, SA
    
    FranceTsqware, Inc.
    
    DelawareVirata Israel, Ltd.
    
    IsraelVirata USA, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaVirata Taiwan Co. Ltd.
    
    Taiwan
Exhibit 32.1


        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Renewable Assets, Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2005, I, Alfred
M. Schiffrin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Renewable Assets,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Renewable Assets, Inc.

                                     /s/ ALFRED M. SCHIFFRIN
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer


         November 9, 2005

                                     - 15 -
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence L. Bartlett, the Chief Financial Officer of Amnis Systems Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  the  Annual  Report  on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended  December  31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or  78o(d));  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 19, 2003

/s/  Lawrence L. Bartlett
Name:  Lawrence L. Bartlett
Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                       45
<PAGE>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EUGENE ENSLIN

No. 754SC90

(Filed 7 May 1975)

Crime Against Nature § 1— constitutionality of statute

G.S. 14-177 which provides that the crime against nature is a felony is constitutional.

Appeal by defendant from *Webb, Judge.*Judgment entered 26- September 1974 in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 9 April 1975.

*663By bill of indictment proper, in form defendant was charged with committing “ . . . the abominable and detestable crime against nature with Herbert P. Morgan, a male person *. ”*

Before pleading, defendant moved to quash the indictment and for a dismissal of the prosecution on the ground that the indictment is unconstitutional.

The court reserved its ruling on the motion to quash but later overruled it. Defendant pleaded not guilty, a jury found him guilty as charged, and from judgment imposing prison sentence of one year, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General Edwin M. Speas, Jr., for the State.*

*Smith, Carrington, Patterson, Follín & Curtis, by Norman B. Smith, and Marilyn G. Haft (by brief), for defendant oppel-lant.*

BRITT, Judge.

By his sole assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in denying his motions to quash the indictment, dismiss the action, and for nonsuit on the ground that the statute under which he was indicted, G.S. 14-177, is unconstitutional, in that it violates the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution. We find no merit in the assignment.

In *State v. Crouse,*22 N.C. App. 47, 205 S.E. 2d 361 (1974), and *State v. Moles,*17 N.C. App. 664, 195 S.E. 2d 352 (1973), this court upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-177. We reaffirm- our rulings in these cases and again hold that the subject statute is constitutional.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Martin concur.
23



Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-43601) pertaining  to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and  Consultants
Option Plan of AFP Imaging Corporation of our report dated August 25, 2003, with
respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of AFP Imaging
Corporation  as of June 30,  2003 and for  each of the two  years in the  period
ended June 30,  2003  included in this  Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 2004.


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
September 24, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5043 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5043

       To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify the 
 dischargeability of debts for certain educational payments and loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2010

   Mr. Cohen (for himself and Mr. Davis of Illinois) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify the 
 dischargeability of debts for certain educational payments and loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Student Loan Bankruptcy 
Fairness Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGE.

    Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B), and
            (2) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i)--
                            (i) by striking ``(i)'', and
                            (ii) by inserting ``any program for which 
                        substantially all of the funds are provided by 
                        a'' after ``unit or'', and
                    (B) in clause (ii)--
                            (i) by striking ``(ii)'' and inserting 
                        ``(B)'', and
                            (ii) by striking ``or'' at the end.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date:  July 21, 2008

| |                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Randal Hardy
_____________________________
Randal
Hardy
Chief
Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARKIN MONROE ST. JOHN

No. 7315SC90

(Filed 14 March 1973)

Automobiles § 126; Criminal Law § 34— driving under the influence, second offense — evidence of prior convictions admissible

In a prosecution charging defendant with driving under the influence, second offense, and operating a motor vehicle without first being licensed by the State Department of Motor Vehicles, there was *588no error in allowing the State to introduce evidence of defendant’s prior conviction and permitting the solicitor to read to the jury the warrant which alleged the prior convictions.

Appeal by defendant from *Cooper, Judge, 7*August 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Alamance County.

Defendant, Larkin Monroe St. John, was charged in a warrant, proper in form, with operating a motor vehicle (1) while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense, and (2) without first being licensed by the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles. Defendant pleaded not guilty and was found guilty as charged. From a judgment imposing a prison sentence of six months on each count charged in the warrant, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan and Assistant Attorneys Genaral William W. Melvin and William B. Ray for the State.*

*Latham, Pickard, Cooper and Ennis by M. Glenn Pickard for defendant appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

The record contains no exceptions or assignments of error. The following appears in the record as appellant’s statement of case on appeal.

> “I have made a study of this record, and I am unable to find any error save the very severe procedure which allows the State to introduce evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction and to permit the Solicitor to read to the jury the warrant which alleged the prior convictions.”

The procedure complained of was approved and held to be without error in the case of *State v. Owenby,*10 N.C. App. 170, 177 S.E. 2d 749 (1970).

We have carefully examined the record and find no error on the face thereof. The defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER






In connection with the Quarterly Report of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)  promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  August 14, 2009
By:
/s/ Thalia GietzenThalia GietzenVP of Finance
#### LUIS LORENZO HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7426

February 6, 1974

519 P.2d 107

*Peter L. Flangas,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Roy A. Woof-ter,*District Attorney, *Charles L. Garner,*Chief Deputy District Attorney, and *Addeliar D. Guy,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

*66OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

The appellant, a juvenile, was certified to stand trial as an adult for the crime of involuntary manslaughter. Certification is authorized if the crime charged “would be a felony if committed by an adult,” NRS 62.080. Since the punishment for involuntary manslaughter may be either state prison confinement, a felony, or county jail confinement, a gross misdemeanor [NRS 200.090], the appellant contends that certification is impermissible. This contention ignores NRS 193.120(2) which provides that “every crime which may be punished by death or imprisonment in the state prison is a felony.”

Prior to judgment, an offense which is punishable either by imprisonment in the state prison or confinement in the county jail is deemed a felony for all purposes and remains a felony until the court imposes a lesser sentence. Brooks v. Superior Court, 48 Cal.Rptr. 762, 764 (Cal.App. 1966); People v. Cline, 75 Cal.Rptr. 459, 462 (Cal.App. 1969). Since involuntary manslaughter may be punished by imprisonment in the state prison it is a felony for the purposes of certification even though the district court may decide to impose a lesser sentence.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Hill International, Inc.**

**Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**

I, John Fanelli III, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hill International, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover reporting. 

 

Dated: May 7, 2009