alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12

                INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (unaudited)

                                 (in thousands)



                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                    Nov. 30,  Nov. 30,    Nov. 30,  Nov. 30,
                                       1996      1995        1996      1995
Earnings before income taxes        $12,338   $ 9,055     $16,963   $20,005
Plus: Fixed charges (1)               6,810     6,552      20,291    21,914
Less: Capitalized interest               (7)      (26)        (26)     (121)

Earnings available to cover
  fixed charges                     $19,141   $15,581     $37,228   $41,798

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges     2.81      2.38        1.83      1.91


(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:

                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                    Nov. 30,  Nov. 30,    Nov. 30,  Nov. 30,
                                       1996      1995        1996      1995
Interest expense, gross              $4,438    $4,187     $13,375   $14,632
Rentals (Interest factor)             2,372     2,365       6,916     7,282
  Total fixed charges                $6,810    $6,552     $20,291   $21,914
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-10618 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE AVEJA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-232-2
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Aveja has moved for leave to wit h d r a w a n d has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aveja has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H 

### C I R


### . R. 42.2. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Novembe r 8, 2 012 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-10618 Document: 00512048444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2012
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Annual Report of IRIS
International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, César M. García, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
March 15, 2010



/s/ César M. GarcíaCésar M. García Chief Executive Officer
Back to Contents

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Searle, Chief Executive Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Authority.

By:  /s/ Douglas SearleDouglas SearleChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, I, Kevin S. Royal, Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. at the dates indicated.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/    KEVIN S.
ROYAL                                                                               
|               |  |  |  | Kevin S. Royal                                                                                      
|               |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Maxwell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Maxwell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Amendment to Certificate of Designation 05/01/2000



 EXHIBIT 4.6 
  
 AMENDMENT TO
THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION, 
 PREFERENCES AND RIGHTS OF 
 THE SERIES L PREFERRED STOCK OF

 RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
 DATED APRIL 30, 1999, AS AMENDED FEBRUARY 18, 2000

  
 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the
“Corporation”), hereby certifies that the following resolutions were adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors as provided in the Corporation’s Certificate of
Incorporation, and by the sole holder of the Series L Preferred Stock of the Corporation pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware: 
  
 RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section E(5)(f) of the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series L Preferred Stock of the Corporation filed
with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 30, 1999, as amended February 18, 2000, be deleted and replaced with the following sentence: 
  
 “RPI shall at all times reserve and keep available, out of its authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, solely for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the shares of Series L Preferred at the time
outstanding, 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock.” 
  
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Amendment to the Certificate of Designations,
Preferences and Rights of Series L Preferred Stock, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Amendment”), is hereby authorized and approved and the appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized to execute,
file and deliver such Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State; 
  
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Company be,
and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company or otherwise, to make all such arrangements, to do and perform all such acts and things, and to execute and deliver all such officers’ certificates
and such other instruments and documents as they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to effectuate fully the purpose of each and all the foregoing resolutions (hereby ratifying and confirming any and all actions taken heretofore and hereafter
to accomplish such purposes, all or singular). 
 

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEROF, this Amendment to the certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series L Preferred Stock of
the Corporation is executed on behalf of the Corporation this 27th day of April, 2000. 
  
 
	 RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    LAWRENCE E. BULLOCK
        
 

	  	 	 Lawrence E. Bullock, Vice President of Administration and Finance, CFO and Secretary
 

 

	 	

  
 

 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20891 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JACK NOVOSELSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-96-1916 (CR-H-91-59-25)

- - - - - - - - - - Janurary 30, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * We construe the notice of appeal filed by Jack Novoselsky, federal inmate #42181-019, as a request for the issuance of a certificate of appealability (COA). See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Orozco , ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Dec. 31, 1996, No. 96-50402), 1996 WL 742530 at *4. IT IS ORDERED that COA is GRANTED on Novoselsky’s claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by misinforming Novoselsky of the plea agreement termsNo. 96-20891 - 2 - and their effect. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that COA is DENIED on the remaining issues. See id. The district court’s summary denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion fails to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law on this ineffective-assistance claim, a claim for which the defendant may be entitled to relief in light of the record containing the affidavit of trial counsel. See Gray v. Lucas , 677 F.2d 1086, 1102 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied , 461 U.S. 910 (1983). Briefing by the Government is not necessary at this time. See Dickinson v. Wainwright , 626 F.2d 1184, 1186 (5th Cir. Unit B 1980). Therefore, we vacate the district court’s order regarding this one claim and remand for further proceedings.
COA GRANTED ON ONE CLAIM. VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

We consent to the use of our reports dated January 31, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gray Communications Systems,
Inc. in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Bull Run Corporation for the year
ended June 30, 2000.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference thereon of our reports dated
January 31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Gray Communications Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Bull Run Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2000, in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-91296, Form S-8 No. 333-56125 and Form
S-8 No. 333-39700) pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation 1994 Long Term
Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91298) pertaining to
the Bull Run Corporation Non-Employee Directors' 1994 Stock Option Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-84833) pertaining to the issuance of
shares of BR Holding, Inc.



                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
September 25, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5358 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5358

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2010

Ms. Castor of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Florida Coastal Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRELEASING, LEASING, AND 
              RELATED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF 
              FLORIDA.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Prohibition of Oil and Natural Gas Preleasing, Leasing, and 
Related Activities in Certain Areas Off the Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this section or any other law, the Secretary may not offer for 
        oil and gas leasing or preleasing or any related activity, any 
        tract located in--
                    ``(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico that 
                is referred to in section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico 
                Energy Security Act of 2006;
                    ``(B) the South Atlantic Planning Area; or
                    ``(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area.
            ``(2) Limitation on effect.--Nothing in this subsection 
        affects any right under any lease issued under this Act before 
        the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Conexant Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68755, 333-69385, 333-84187,
333-91347, 333-92437, 333-32448, 333-37918, 333-39184, 333-42498, 333-42772,
333-42728, 333-48224, 333-48262, 333-44094, 333-54646, 333-54672, 333-68724,
333-70420, 333-73142, 333-73858, 333-86838, 333-86868 and 333-97539) and in the
Registration Statements of Conexant Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-70085,
333-30596, 333-38890, 333-42500, 333-48270, 333-61912, 333-67190, 333-88038 and
333-97285) of our report dated October 22, 2002, except for note 16, as to which
the date is November 22, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph referring to a restatement to report the June
25, 2002 spin-off of the wireless communications business and sale of the
Mexicali operations as discontinued operations), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Conexant Systems, Inc.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
December 12, 2002
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800024

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

VINCENT A. SWEITZER

Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, Marine Corps Forces 

Command, Norfolk, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Colonel Robert A. Fifer,

USMC.

For Appellant: Captain William S. Laragy, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 03 May 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and HINES, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Document

Exhibit 10.4



Updated February 1, 2022
RAC Board Compensation Overview – 2022 Program


									
		ITEM	2022 AMOUNT
	(1)	Annual Retainers – Cash retainer amounts for non-employee directors, Chairman, Committee Chairs and Committee Members.
	•Board service (all directors including Chairman) - $77,500
•Chairman - $175,000
•Audit Chair -- $27,500
•Audit Member -- $15,000
•Compensation Chair -- $25,000
•Compensation Member – $10,500
•Governance Chair -- $20,000
•Governance Member -- $10,000



	(2)	Special Board Committee Fees – If a non-employee Director serves on a special committee of the Board, the Compensation Committee will determine whether to provide supplemental fees to such Director and the amount of such fees, provided no fees in excess of $30,000/year per Director shall be paid without approval from the Board.


	•TBD

	(3)	Annual DSU Award – Annual equity award to each non-employee director in the form of Deferred Stock Units pursuant to the LTIP. Each DSU represents the right to receive one share of Rent-A-Center common stock. The award is fully vested upon grant and the shares covered by the award are issued upon the termination of the director’s service as a member of the Board. DSUs do not have voting rights.


	•$132,500 in value

	(4)	Optional DSU Deferral Awards – Ability to elect each year to defer all/some of the following year’s (1) cash retainers and (2) cash dividends payable on outstanding record date DSUs, into additional DSUs. (based on the closing price of RAC stock immediately preceding the date the cash retainers and deferred cash dividends are payable). A company match of 25% is applied to deferred cash retainers and deferred cash dividends when calculating the DSUs.


	•Based on amount of cash retainers and cash dividends deferred, plus 25% match

	(5)	Cash Dividend Equivalents on DSUs – Unless deferred as described above, the number of DSUs held by a director as of the dividend record date are entitled to receive cash dividends, if and when declared by the Board, as if the DSUs were issued/outstanding shares of RAC common stock. Not entitled to any 25% match.


	•Based on the number of DSUs held as of the dividend record date and dividend per share
#### JAMES LOUIS BRUNER, Appellant, v. CAROL R. BRUNER, Respondent.

No. 9140

March 15, 1978

575 P.2d 928

*David M. Schreiber,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*123
      *Dickerson, Miles & Pico,*of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

We are asked to annul a discretionary order denying a father’s motion to change the custody of his son. There was substantial evidence submitted to support the apparent conclusion of the court that the child’s welfare would not be enhanced by a change of custody.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:

May 21

, 2009

By:   /s/

Randal Hardy





_____________________________





Randal Hardy



Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer



Principal Executive and Financial Officer

| | 
| | 
| | 





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 10.37**

 

**AMENDMENT**

**TO THE CUBIC ENERGY, INC.**

**2005 STOCK OPTION PLAN**

 

THIS AMENDMENT to the 2005 Stock Option Plan(the “Plan”) is hereby adopted by Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”),effective as of May 7, 2010.

 

WHEREAS, the Company established the Plan,which was approved by the Company’s shareholders effective as of the date ofthe Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right toamend the Plan pursuant to Section 17 thereof; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Planto increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock which may besubject to awards granted under the Plan, which amendment was approved by theCompany’s shareholders effective as of the date of the Company’s annual meetingof shareholders in 2010;

 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 17 ofthe Plan, the first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended toread in its entirety as follows:

 

Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 12(a) hereof,the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant toOptions granted under this Plan or Bonus Stock Awards under this Plan shall notexceed 5,750,000 shares.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of theadoption of the foregoing Amendment, the Company has caused this Amendment tobe executed by a duly authorized officer effective as of the date first setforth above.

 
| ** ** | **CUBIC ENERGY, INC.** |
|------------|-----------------------------|
| ** ** | ** **                  |
|       |                        |
|       | By:                         | /s/ Jon Stuart Ross |
|       | Name:                       | Jon Stuart Ross |
|       | Title:                      | Secretary |

 

----