United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

V.C., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. ARMY 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Mobile, AL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0852

Issued: January 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On March 7, 2020 appellant filed a timely appeal from an October 17, 2019 merit decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act1(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over 

the merits of this case.2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $966.54, for which she was without fault, because she concurrently received Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation for the 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

2 The Board notes that, following the October 17, 2019 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, 

the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record 

that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the 

Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this 

additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

period July 21 through August 17, 2019; and (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of 

recovery of the overpayment.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On June 9, 1999 appellant, then a 44-year-old office automation assistant, filed an 

occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she developed an emotional condition due 

to factors of her federal employment. OWCP accepted the claim for adjustment disorder with 

mixed anxiety and depression. It paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the supplemental rolls 

as of August 16, 1999 and on the periodic rolls as of April 23, 2000. 

In a letter dated May 14, 2018, OWCP informed appellant that it was reducing her 

compensation benefits paid on the periodic rolls based on her actual earnings as a substitute teacher 

for the period September 17, 2017 through April 28, 2018 with the first regular payment effective 

April 29, 2018. By separate letter of even date, it informed her that she may be entitled to receive 

benefits provided by OPM under the Civil Retirement System or the Federal Employees 

Retirement System. OWCP enclosed an election of benefits form (Form CA-1105). 

On November 9, 2018 OWCP received appellant’s completed Form CA-1105 dated 

November 1, 2018. Appellant elected to receive OPM benefits in lieu of benefits to which she 

may be entitled under FECA, effective July 21, 2019. In an accompanying letter she explained 

that she would turn 65 in July 2019 and this notice should provide ample time to prevent any

overpayment from occurring. 

In a December 6, 2018 letter to OPM, OWCP indicated that appellant elected to receive 

OPM benefits effective July 21, 2019 in lieu of compensation benefits under FECA, and it 

requested that OPM commence annuity payments effective that date. It attached her November 1, 

2018 Form CA-1105. 

On August 9, 2019 OWCP received a completed Form EN1032 dated July 31, 2019 in 

which appellant indicated that, while she had been assigned a Civil Service Active number, she 

had not received a regular retirement check from OPM in the past 15 months. 

An OWCP compensation termination fiscal worksheet dated September 5, 2019 noted that 

the effective date of the periodic rolls termination was July 21, 2019 due to appellant’s selection 

of July 21, 2019 as the effective date for the receipt of her OPM benefits. It also noted that an 

overpayment in the amount of $966.54 had been created as she continued to be paid FECA 

compensation for 28 additional days after her effective election date for the period July 21 through 

August 17, 2019. 

In a September 5, 2019 letter to OPM, OWCP indicated that appellant elected to receive 

OPM benefits effective July 21, 2019 in lieu of compensation benefits under FECA, and it 

requested that OPM commence annuity payments effective that date. It attached her November 1, 

2018 Form CA-1105. 

On September 9, 2019 OWCP issued a preliminary determination that appellant received 

an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $966.54 for the period July 21 through 

August 17, 2019. It explained that the overpayment was the result of her receipt of FECA 
3

compensation benefits through August 17, 2019 after having elected receipt of OPM benefits, 

effective July 21, 2019. OWCP determined that appellant was without fault in the creation of the 

overpayment because it erred in timely terminating her wage-loss compensation and she would 

not have had actual knowledge of the calculation error. It provided a calculation of the 

overpayment and requested that she complete an overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form 

OWCP-20) and submit supporting financial documentation. OWCP advised that failure to submit 

the requested information within 30 days would result in the denial of waiver of the overpayment. 

Additionally, it notified appellant that within 30 days of the date of the letter she could request a 

final decision based on the written evidence or a prerecoupment hearing. 

In a September 16, 2019 memorandum of telephone call (Form CA-110), appellant 

informed OWCP that she was not receiving any payment from OPM nor had she received any 

correspondence from OPM regarding the commencement of her retirement benefits as of 

July 21, 2019. 

In a letter dated September 17, 2019, appellant disputed the overpayment as she had not

received her retirement annuity or any money from OPM since electing to receive retirement 

benefits in lieu of FECA benefits more than a year ago. 

In an October 17, 2019 Form CA-110, OWCP noted that appellant was not receiving either 

FECA benefits or any payment from OPM. It also noted the possibility that OPM would reimburse 

OWCP once her retirement payments commenced. 

By decision dated October 17, 2019, OWCP finalized the preliminary overpayment 

determination, finding an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $966.54 for the period 

July 21 through August 17, 2019. It explained that the overpayment occurred because appellant 

received both FECA compensation and OPM retirement benefits between July 21 and 

August 17, 2019. OWCP found that she was without fault in the creation of the overpayment. 

However, it denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment because the record contained no 

evidence that recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity 

and good conscience. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102 of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability or death of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the 

performance of duty.3 Section 8116 of FECA defines the limitations on the right to receive 

compensation benefits.4 Section 8116(a) provides that, while an employee is receiving workers’

compensation benefits, he or she may not receive salary, pay, or remuneration of any type from 

the United States, except in return for services actually performed or for certain payments related 

to service in the Armed Forces, including benefits administered by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, unless such benefits are payable for the same injury or the same death being compensated 

 

3 5 U.S.C. § 8102.

4

Id. at § 8116.
4

for under FECA.5 Section 10.421(a) of OWCP’s implementing regulations provide that a 

beneficiary may not receive wage-loss compensation concurrently with a federal retirement or 

survivor annuity.6 The beneficiary must elect the benefit that he or she wishes to receive.7

OWCP’s procedures also explain that the employee must make an election between FECA 

benefits and OPM benefits. The employee has the right to elect the monetary benefit which is the 

more advantageous.8

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP improperly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $966.54 for the period July 21 through 

August 17, 2019.

On November 1, 2018 appellant completed a form indicating her election of OPM 

retirement benefits effective July 21, 2019. OWCP, however, continued to pay her wage-loss 

compensation for temporary total disability for the period July 21 through August 17, 2019. It 

calculated that an overpayment of $966.54 was therefore created.

FECA beneficiary may not receive wage-loss compensation concurrently with a federal 

retirement or survivor annuity.9 The clear language of section 8116(a) of FECA, section 10.421(a) 

of OWCP’s implementing regulations, and OWCP’s procedures prohibit the concurrent receipt of 

FECA wage-loss benefits and a federal annuity.10

However, there is no evidence of record establishing that appellant actually received OPM 

retirement benefits for the period July 21 through August 17, 2019.11 In letters dated December 6, 

2018 and September 5, 2019, OWCP informed OPM that she had elected to receive retirement 

annuity benefits effective July 21, 2019 in lieu of FECA wage-loss compensation and requested 

that OPM commence annuity payments effective to that date. The record also contains a form 

EN1032 dated July 31, 2019 in which appellant indicated that she had not received any payment 

from OPM as of that date and memorandum of calls dated September 16 and October 17, 2019 in 

which she stated that she had not received any retirement annuity from OPM. Additionally, OWCP 

 

5

Id. at § 8116(a).

6 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(a).

7

Id.

8 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, Dual Benefits, Chapter 2.1000.4(a) (January 1997); see also 

D.J., Docket No. 20-0004 (issued May 21, 2020); R.S., Docket No. 11-0428 (issued September 27, 2011); Harold 

Weisman, Docket No. 93-1335 (issued March 30, 1994).

9 Supra note 5.

10 5 U.S.C. § 8116(a); 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(a); Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, supra note 8.

11 See V.B., Docket No. 19-1874 (issued June 4, 2020); C.P., Docket No. 19-0732 (issued September 5, 2019); J.M.,

Docket No. 15-1604 (issued May 23, 2016).
5

noted in the October 17, 2019 memorandum of call that OPM might reimburse it for the FECA 

benefits paid for the period July 21 through August 17, 2019.

OWCP based its overpayment findings on its determination that appellant had received 

prohibited dual OPM and FECA benefits for the period July 21 through August 17, 2019. The 

Board has previously held that the mere fact that a claimant received FECA benefits after the 

effective date of an OPM election will not establish receipt of a prohibited dual benefit.12 While 

the record reflects that appellant received FECA benefits for this period, the Board finds that 

OWCP had not established that she also received OPM retirement benefits for that same period.13

Therefore, the Board finds that OWCP has not met its burden of proof to establish that the 

overpayment occurred.

14

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP improperly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $966.54 for the period July 21 through 

August 17, 2019.15

 

12 Id. See also B.H., Docket No. 13-1955 (issued January 29, 2014).

13 See V.B., supra note 11; R.R., Docket No. 18-0032 (issued May 3, 2018) (The election form signed by appellant 

on December 21, 2018 was insufficient to show that he actually began receiving OPM retirement benefits). See also 

E.R., Docket No. 18-0084 (issued July 27, 2018).

14 See V.B., supra note 11; J.A., Docket No. 18-0259 (issued August 5, 2019).

15 In light of the Board’s disposition of issue 1, issue 2 is rendered moot.
6

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the October 17, 2019 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is reversed.

Issued: January 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board