alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Herman R. Planten, Trading under the Name of Herman Planten & Son, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York et al., Appellants.

*Planten*v. *City of New York,*178 App. Div. 824, affirmed.

(Argued June 5, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

• Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 25, 1917, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff sought to restrain the defendants from enforcing sections 116 and 117 of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York which regulate the sale of proprietary and patent medicines in that •city and among other things require that *“*The names of the ingredients of every such medicine, to which the therapeutic effécts claimed are attributed, and the names of all other ingredients, except such as are physiologically inactive, shall be. registered in the department of health in such manner as the regulations of the board of health may prescribe.” The Appellate Division held the provisions invalid. , '

*William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *John F. O’Brien*of counsel) for appellants.

*George W. Wickersham, Harry B. Thompson*and *Francis H. McAdoo*for respondent.

*609Judgment affirmed, without costs, on opinion of Cardozo, J., in *Fougera & Co.*v. *City of New York*(224 N. Y. 269).

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ. Concur in result: Chase, Collin and McLaughlin, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5198 

To express the sense of Congress that the Federal Pell Grant program 

should be a high funding priority. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2010 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Ms. TITUS, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. LANCE, Mr. LEE

of New York, and Mr. ROGERS of Michigan) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To express the sense of Congress that the Federal Pell 

Grant program should be a high funding priority. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 It is the sense of Congress that— 

5 (1) the Federal Pell Grant program under sec6 tion 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

7 U.S.C. 1070a) is the single largest source of grant 

8 aid for postsecondary education attendance funded 

9 by the Federal Government; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5198 IH

1 (2) the Federal Pell Grant program plays a 

2 unique role in promoting economic and social mobil3 ity in the United States; 

4 (3) the Federal Pell Grant program is the Na5 tion’s largest single source of need-based grant as6 sistance; 

7 (4) financial aid has a significant positive im8 pact on the postsecondary enrollment and success 

9 rates of students from low income families; and 

10 (5) the Federal Pell Grant Program should be 

11 a high funding priority. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### R. W. GALLAHER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. H. W. PHILLIPS and Mrs. Lois F. Phillips, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-2019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 21, 1972.

James W. Nobles, Jr., Jackson, Miss., Jack F. Dunbar, Clarksdale, Miss., Bobby G. Perry, Southaven, Miss., Ross R. Barnett, Sr., Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.

A. Cinclair May, Sardis, Miss., Max D. Lucas, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., John Whitten, Jr., Sumner, Miss., J. W. Kirkpatrick, Memphis, Tenn., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This cause is ordered affirmed by the Court from the bench at oral argument, at the close of appellants’ argument.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, John Swallow, CEO, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 22, 2006.  /s/ John Swallow  _______________________ John Swallow (CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
**Exhibit31.2**

**RIVER ROCK ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David B. Wolfe,certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of theRiver Rock Entertainment Authority;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 20, 2006
| By:                      | /s/ DAVID B.  WOLFE |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| David B. Wolfe           |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 10.37


BULK RESOURCES, INC.
P.O. Box 50401
Hendersvon, NV 89016


March 15, 2002

Conrad Clement
President
Featherlite, Inc.
Highways 63 & 9
P.O. Box 320
Cresco, IA 52136

Dear Conrad:

Bulk Resources, Inc. is agreeable to make the following changes to the
convertible promissory note as we discussed pursuant to our letter dated
February 18, 2002.

We are willing to extend the loan per U.S. Bank's request to December 31, 2002.
With the extension of the note, Featherlite, Inc. will give Bulk Resources, Inc.
the option of converting at $3.00 or whatever the average price is between
4/30/02 and 10/30/02. The average price would be calculated using the closing
price at the end of each trading day between 4/30/02 and 10/30/02. During this
time insiders, as defined by the SEC, would need to limit the total purchases of
stock to an aggregate total of 50,000 shares through 10/30/02. Bulk Resources,
Inc. would have to exercise the option to convert by January 15, 2003.

Conrad, please call if you have any other questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Terry Taylor

Terry Taylor
President
Bulk Resources, Inc.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5256 

To provide for the hiring, training, and deploying of additional Border Patrol 

agents along the southwest international border of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To provide for the hiring, training, and deploying of additional Border Patrol agents along the southwest international border of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Border Secu5 rity Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORDER PATROL AGENTS ALONG 

7 SOUTHWEST INTERNATIONAL BORDER. 

8 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall hire, train, 

9 and deploy additional Border Patrol agents along the 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5256 IH

1 southwest international border of the United States as fol2 lows: 

3 (1) 2,000 additional Border Patrol agents by 

4 September 30, 2010, over the number of such 

5 agents as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (2) 1,500 additional Border Patrol agents by 

7 September 30, 2011, over the number of such 

8 agents on September 30, 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
[AMENDMENT LONG TERM PERFORMANCE PLAN]

      1.5   Shares Subject to the Plan:

            Shares of stock issued under the Plan may be in whole or in
      part authorized and unissued or treasury shares of the Corporation's
      common stock, par value $.01 (the "Common Stock").  The maximum
      number of Shares (as defined below) which may be issued for all
      purposes under the Plan shall be 1,500,000 and the maximum number
      of Shares which may be issued for all purposes under the Plan to any
      one Participant shall be 1,000,000.  Any Shares subject to an Option
      which for any reason is canceled (excluding Shares subject to an
      Option canceled upon the exercise of a related SAR) or terminated
      without having been exercised, or any shares of Restricted Stock or
      Performance Shares which are forfeited, shall again be available for
      awards under the Plan, provided that if the Participant received any
      economic benefit from holding such Option SAR, Dividend
      Equivalent, Other Stock-Based Award, Performance Unit,
      Performance Shares or Restricted Stock that is not subsequently
      forfeited, such shares shall not become available again for award under
      the Plan.  Shares subject to an Option canceled upon the exercise of an
      SAR shall not again be available for award under the Plan.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32002R1997

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1997/2002 of 8 November 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 296/96 on data to be transmitted by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)***Official Journal L 308 , 09/11/2002 P. 0009 - 0009*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1997/2002

of 8 November 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 296/96 on data to be transmitted by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy(1), and in particular Articles 5(3) and 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 16(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(2) provides that the budget shall be drawn up and implemented in euro and the accounts shall be presented in euro.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1934/2001(4), should be amended so as to bring it in line with this new provision.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 4(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 296/96 is hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(2) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 39, 17.2.1996, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 262, 2.10.2001, p. 8.
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 1999, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: August 31, 2005                   David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,849
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          22,869
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    249,159
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        453,791
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 747,332
<DEPOSITS>                                     429,225
<SHORT-TERM>                                    94,811
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,812
<LONG-TERM>                                     54,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 747,332
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,087
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,039
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                48,126
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,444
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,062
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (48)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,671
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,055
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.42
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,574
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,027
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      542
<RECOVERIES>                                        76
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,623
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,623
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            542

</TABLE>
#### William J. Roche, Plaintiff, *v.*Raymond Holbrook, Defendant. Thomas O’Shea, Plaintiff, *v.*Raymond Holbrook, Defendant. Michael O’Shea, Plaintiff, *v.*Raymond Holbrook, Defendant. Helen G. Kesel, an Infant, by George J. Kesel, Her Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff, *v.*Raymond Holbrook, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Onondaga County,

May 19, 1936.

*Stone, Marvin & Hand,*for the plaintiffs.

*McCurn, Farnham & Martineau,*for the defendant.

Cross, J.

This is a motion to change the place of trial of the above-entitled actions from Onondaga county to Otsego county.

The actions arose out of an automobile collision which occurred in Otsego county; the defendant resides in that county. The plaintiffs reside in Onondaga county. The affidavits presented in favor of and in opposition to the motion are somewhat conflicting as to *797the materiality of certain witnesses which are claimed to be material and necessary. The plaintiffs must attend the trial. One of the plaintiffs is an infant. Giving effect to plaintiffs’ claims that it will be necessary to produce the doctors who treated the different plaintiffs, the number of plaintiffs’ witnesses exceeds the number of defendant’s witnesses. The rule 'that the convenience of parties and of expert witnesses will not be consulted on a motion to change the place of trial of an action for the convenience of witnesses, does not apply to expert witnesses, who will testify from their personal knowledge of the matter in controversy, as distinguished from those experts who will give their opinions on an assumed state of facts. *(Groff*v. *Rome Metallic Bedstead Co.,*98 App. Div. 152; *Taylor*v. *Jacobs,*168 id. 260.)

The court is unable to determine in this application that the doctors are not material witnesses for the plaintiffs on matters of personal knowledge. I am aware that, other things being equal, the place where the transitory cause of action arose is ordinarily the proper county in which to try the action. That rule, however, is not universal. The state of the calendar is such in Syracuse that these four actions can be tried together promptly, having the advantage of an early trial which goes with the right to preference in the infant’s action. In this situation, and in view of the modern means of transportation, the invisible county line should not be given controlling consideration. Neither the convenience of material witnesses nor the ends of justice will be promoted by the change of venue.

Motion denied, with a single item of ten dollars costs in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant. Prepare order.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0372

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM JAMES PILLANS,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 17, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0372
** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                W. G. Holliman                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | W.                G. Holliman                       |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Furniture                Brands International, Inc. |
|   | May                9, 2006                          |
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Diatect International Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I,
Jay W. Downs, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ Jay W. Downs

Jay W. Downs
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SERGIO RENE MONTEJANO

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 12

- 00 235

- C R

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20090D05687 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant = s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until April 16 , 2013

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT = S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John L. Williams, Appellant ’ s Attorney, prepare the

Appellant = s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 16 , 201 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of April, 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.