alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITITME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#641016050001050a05081d170d17240209074a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="314543505554505f505d4842584271575c521f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Agreement No.: 011488-002.
    Title: CSAV/Lauritzen Reefers Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: CSAV Sud Americana de Vapores S.A. and LauritzenCool AB.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment changes LauritzenCool AB to 
NYKLauritzenCool AB in the agreement, changes the agreement name, and 
republishes the agreement.

    Dated: October 14, 2005.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20914 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Financial Telecom Limited (USA), Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

(1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                           Financial Telecom Limited (US), Inc.


Date: July 28, 2005                        By: /s/ David Chen
                                               -----------------------
                                               David Chen
                                               Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 28, 2005                        By: /s/ Ronald Gorthuis
                                               -----------------------
                                               Ronald Gorthuis
                                               Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5244 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5244

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
     amounts received for services by a student at a work-college.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2010

 Mr. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Roskam, and Mr. 
Davis of Kentucky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
     amounts received for services by a student at a work-college.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS RECEIVED FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY STUDENT AT WORK 
              COLLEGE EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) a comprehensive student work-learning-service 
                program (as defined in section 448(e) of the Higher 
                Education Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 2756b(e))) operated by 
                a work college (as defined in such section).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2010.
                                 <all>
```
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 8, 201 3

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01018

- CV

NGAN BAO

- NGUYEN LE A/K/A DILL ION LE , Appellant

V.
MINDY TRAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 11626



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
According to information provided to this court, t his appeal is from a judgment signed July 25, 2012. The clerk’s record was due November 22, 2012,
but it was not filed. The clerk responsible for preparing t he record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On December 4 , 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within2

fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record , and the clerk’s
record has not b een filed

.
T he appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Vincent Rossi, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of St. Bernard Software, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/s/ Vincent RossiVincent RossiChief Executive OfficerDated: November 19, 2007
#### JAMES A. DUGGER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

No. 7410SC90

(Filed 17 April 1974)

Purported appeal by defendant from an order entered by *Bailey, Judge,*on 29 October 1973, in chambers, in the Superior Court of Wake County.

*Sanford, Cannon, Adams & McCullough by Robert W. Spear-man; Everett, Everett & Creech by William G. Hancock, attorneys for plaintiff appellee.*

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Walter E. Ricks III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

The purported appeal is from an interlocutory order and the appeal is dismissed. Certiorari is denied.

Appeal dismissed.

Certiorari denied.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                            |  |                              |  |                       |       |  |                                    
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ----- |  | -----------------------------------
|Parent                      |  | Subsidiary                   |  | PercentageofOwnership |       |  | State ofIncorporationorOrganization
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Bank             |  | 100                   | %     |  | Federal                            
|                            |  |                              | 
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Holdings, Inc.   |  | 100                   | %     |  | Ohio                               
|                            |  |                              | 
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Capital Trust    |  | 100                   | % (1) |  | Delaware                           
|                            |  |                              | 
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Capital Trust II |  | 100                   | % (1) |  | Delaware                           

---

|(1) | This is a special purpose entity and is accounted for by First Place Financial Corp. using the equity method of accounting rather than being included as fully consolidated in the
consolidated financial statements.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### VIRGINIA J. BRAY v. THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 7421SC157

(Filed 3 April 1974)

Schools § 13— teachers — vacation and sick pay — 1971 Session Law

Chapter 1068 of the Session Laws of 1971 did not provide vacation and sick pay benefits for public school teachers.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Wood, Judge,*8 October 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Forsyth County.

This is an action to compel defendant to pay plaintiff certain sums for vacation and sick benefits to which she claims she is entitled by reason of the enactment of Chapter 1068 of the Session Laws of 1971. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was allowed.

*Randolph and Randolph by Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.*

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., Deputy Attorney General for defendant appellee.*

*226VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiff’s action must fail for a number of reasons. We need to mention only one. It is perfectly clear that the General Assembly did not, in 1971, appropriate funds for the payments to which plaintiff contends she is entitled, and, for that reason, the action was properly dismissed. Moreover, notwithstanding the language found in its caption, when the act in question is construed contextually it fails to provide the benefits contended for by plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32000D0061

**2000/61/EC: Commission Decision of 21 December 1999 amending Decision 93/436/EEC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile (notified under document number C(1999) 4749) (Text with EEA relevance)***Official Journal L 022 , 27/01/2000 P. 0062 - 0064*

COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 December 1999

amending Decision 93/436/EEC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile

(notified under document number C(1999) 4749)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/61/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products(1), as last amended by the Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) the health certificate for fishery products originating in Chile and intended for export to the European Community was established by Commission Decision 93/436/EEC of 30 June 1993 laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile(3), as last amended by Decision 96/674/EC(4);

(2) the conditions for the import of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms tunicates and marine gastropods originating in Chile are laid down by Commission Decision 96/675/EC(5);

(3) the legislative references cited in the model of the health certificate included in Annex A to Decision 93/436/EEC contain certain mistakes, and it is therefore necessary to modify it;

(4) the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex A to Decision 93/436/EEC shall be replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addresed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 202, 12.8.1993, p. 31.

(4) OJ L 313, 3.12.1996, p. 29.

(5) OJ L 313, 3.12.1996, p. 38.

ANNEX

"ANNEX A

>PIC FILE= "L_2000022EN.006303.EPS">

>PIC FILE= "L_2000022EN.006401.EPS">"
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.T., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, NORTH TEXAS 

PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER,

Coppell, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0029

Issued: October 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On October 4, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a purported June 22, 2021 decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0029.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed this appeal.

2

 Although the case record does contain a letter from OWCP dated 

June 22, 2021, it is informational in nature and, thus, does not constitute a final adverse OWCP 

decision. By that letter, OWCP advised appellant of the medical deficiencies in his case and how 

to correct them. As there is no final adverse OWCP decision over which the Board may properly 

exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0029 must be 

dismissed. Accordingly,

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0029 is dismissed.

Issued: October 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13A-14(1) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Petrosearch Energy Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Collins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the company.


Date: June 6, 2006


By:  /s/David Collins
     -----------------
     David Collins
     Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5174 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 

qualified fuel cell motor vehicles by maintaining the level of credit for 

vehicles placed in service after 2009 and by allowing the credit for 

certain off-highway vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2010 

Mr. TONKO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the credit for qualified fuel cell motor vehicles by maintaining the level of credit for vehicles placed in service 

after 2009 and by allowing the credit for certain offhighway vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fuel Cell Industrial 

5 Vehicle Jobs Act of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5174 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED FUEL 

2 CELL MOTOR VEHICLES. 

3 (a) MAINTENANCE OF $8,000 CREDIT AFTER

4 2009.—Subparagraph (A) of section 30B(b)(1) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to new qualified 

6 fuel cell motor vehicle credit) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘($4,000 in the case of a vehicle placed in service after 

8 December 31, 2009)’’. 

9 (b) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN OFF-HIGHWAY VEHI10 CLES.—Subsection (b) of section 30B of such Code is 

11 amended by adding at the end the following new para12 graph: 

13 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN OFF-HIGH14 WAY VEHICLES.—Solely for purposes of this sub15 section— 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘motor vehi17 cle’ includes any vehicle which is manufactured 

18 primarily for use in carrying or towing loads or 

19 materials for commercial or industrial purposes, 

20 whether or not on public streets, roads, and 

21 highways and regardless of the type of load or 

22 material carried or towed. The preceding sen23 tence shall not include any vehicle operated ex24 clusively on a rail or rails and any vehicle oper25 ated primarily for recreational purposes. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5174 IH

1 ‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL CREDIT.—In the case of 

2 a vehicle which is a motor vehicle solely by rea3 son of subparagraph (A), the amount deter4 mined under paragraph (1) shall be increased 

5 by— 

6 ‘‘(i) $2,000 if such vehicle’s fuel cell 

7 system achieves an electricity generation 

8 efficiency of at least 40 percent but less 

9 than 50 percent based on the lower heating 

10 value of the fuel, or 

11 ‘‘(ii) $4,000 if such vehicle’s fuel cell 

12 system achieves an electricity generation 

13 efficiency of at least 50 percent based on 

14 the lower heating value of the fuel. 

15 ‘‘(C) CERTAIN STANDARDS NOT TO

16 APPLY.—Subsection (h)(10) shall not apply to a 

17 vehicle which is a motor vehicle solely by reason 

18 of subparagraph (A).’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to vehicles placed in service after 

21 December 31, 2009, in taxable years ending after such 

22 date. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2008032DE.01003102.xml

| 6.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 32/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 32/31

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2007/153/EG der Kommission vom 6. März 2007 zur Änderung von Anhang A der Entscheidung 2006/679/EG über die technische Spezifikation für die Interoperabilität des Teilsystems „Zugsteuerung, Zugsicherung und Signalgebung“ des transeuropäischen Hochgeschwindigkeitsbahnsystems und zur Änderung von Anhang A der Entscheidung 2006/860/EG über die technische Spezifikation für die Interoperabilität des Teilsystems „Zugsteuerung/Zugsicherung und Signalgebung“ des konventionellen transeuropäischen Eisenbahnsystems

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 67 vom 7. März 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 67 vom 7. März 2007

Im Inhalt und auf Seite 13, Titel der Entscheidung:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

---