United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.D., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, GENERAL MAIL 

FACILITY, Cleveland, OH, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0447

Issued: September 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On February 4, 2021 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a January 4, 

2021 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the 

Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board 

has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.3

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

3 The Board notes that, following the January 4, 2021 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that 

was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board 

for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional 

evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $8,619.08, for the period July 1, 2018 through 

August 15, 2020, for which she was without fault, because she concurrently received FECA wageloss compensation and Social Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits, 

without an appropriate offset; (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment; and (3) whether OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$200.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On February 1, 2001 appellant, then a 45-year-old modified letter carrier, filed an 

occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she sustained injuries to her left shoulder 

and neck causally related to factors of her federal employment. Her supervisor noted on the form 

that her retirement coverage was Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). OWCP accepted 

the claim for acute exacerbation of the neck myalgia/cervicalgia, left shoulder and upper arm 

acromioclavicular sprain, and left rotator cuff sprain. The record reflects that OWCP paid 

appellant wage-loss compensation on the supplemental rolls as of August 15, 2001 and continually

on the periodic rolls as of October 28, 2007.

On July 2, 2020 OWCP forwarded a FERS/SSA dual benefits calculation worksheet to 

SSA. On August 10, 2020 it forwarded a second FERS/SSA dual benefits calculation worksheet

to SSA to obtain information as to whether an offset of compensation benefits was required. 

On August 13, 2020 OWCP received from SSA a FERS/SSA dual benefits calculation 

form, completed on July 18, 2020, which indicated that appellant had been in receipt of SSA agerelated retirement benefits since July 2018. The form showed her SSA benefit rates with and 

without a FERS offset. Beginning July 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was $899.30 and without 

FERS was $631.30; beginning December 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was $924.40 and without 

FERS was $648.90; and beginning December 2019, the SSA rate with FERS was $939.20 and 

without FERS was $659.20. 

On August 13, 2020 OWCP received a FERS/SSA dual benefits calculation transmittal 

completed by SSA on August 13, 2020 which indicated that appellant had been in receipt of SSA 

age-related retirement benefits since July 2018. The form related appellant’s SSA benefits with 

and without FERS offset since July 2018. Beginning July 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was 

$899.30 and without FERS was $572.00, beginning December 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was 

$924.40 and without FERS was $588.00, and beginning December 2019, the SSA rate with FERS 

was $939.20 and without FERS was $597.30. 

Utilizing the FERS/SSA dual benefits calculation transmittal completed on 

August 13, 2020. OWCP completed a FERS offset calculation worksheet on August 13, 2020. 

This form indicated that, from July 1 through November 30, 2018, appellant received an 

overpayment in the amount of $1,650.89, from December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019 she 

received an overpayment in the amount of $4,047.89, and from December 1, 2019 through 

August 15, 2020 she received an overpayment in the amount of $2,919.30. Based on these figures, 

OWCP calculated the total overpayment amount of $8,618.08. 
3

On August 17, 2020 OWCP issued a preliminary overpayment determination, finding that 

an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $8,619.08 had been created because it had failed 

to reduce appellant’s wage-loss compensation payments for the period July 1, 2018 through 

August 15, 2020, to offset her SSA age-related retirement benefits that were attributable to her 

federal service. It determined that she was without fault in the creation of the overpayment because 

she could not have reasonably known that an improper payment had occurred, due to the 

complexity in benefits administration. OWCP explained that it was not able to obtain the necessary 

information from SSA to reduce appellant’s benefits in a timely manner. It requested that she 

submit a completed overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) to determine a 

reasonable payment method and advised her that she could request a waiver of the overpayment. 

OWCP further requested that appellant provide supporting financial documentation, including 

copies of income tax returns, bank account statements, bills, pay slips, and any other records to 

support income and expenses. Additionally, it provided her with an overpayment action request 

form and further notified her that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, she could request a 

telephone conference, a final decision based on the written evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing. 

In an August 18, 2020 letter, OWCP informed appellant that it would begin deducting

$315.60, the portion of SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to her federal service, from 

her 28-day periodic compensation benefits. 

On August 25, 2020 appellant requested a prerecoupment hearing, which was held 

telephonically on November 2, 2020. She indicated that she supported her grandson and her 

husband. Appellant was allotted 30 days to submit additional financial information.

On December 16, 2020 OWCP received appellant’s November 14, 2020 Form OWCP-20. 

Appellant reported total monthly income of $3,638.00 and total monthly expenses of $3,229.16. 

By decision dated January 4, 2021, the hearing representative finalized the preliminary 

overpayment determination, finding that appellant had received an overpayment of compensation 

in the amount of $8,619.08 for the period July 1, 2018 through August 15, 2020, because she 

concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation 

without an appropriate offset. He also found that she was without fault in the creation of the 

overpayment, but denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment. The hearing representative 

explained that appellant listed her income as $3,638.00, subtracted her expenses of $3,229.16, and 

noted that her monthly income exceeded her expenses by $408.84. Therefore, as appellant’s

monthly income exceeded expenses by more than $50.00, he denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment. The hearing representative explained that, because she failed to meet the first prong 

of the two-prong test of whether recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA, 

it was not necessary to consider the second prong of the test based on assets. He related that the 

overpayment would be recovered by deduction of $200.00 every 28 days from appellant’s 

continuing compensation payments. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of his 

or her federal employment.4 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive compensation: 

 

4

5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).
4

While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, pay, or 

remuneration of any type from the United States.5 When an overpayment has been made to an 

individual because of an error of fact or law, adjustment shall be made under regulations prescribed 

by the Secretary of Labor by decreasing later payments to which the individual is entitled. 6

Section 10.421(d) of the implementing regulations requires that OWCP reduce the amount 

of compensation by the amount of any SSA age-related benefits that are attributable to federal 

service of the employee.7 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have to be 

adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA benefit earned as a 

federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of FECA benefits and 

federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.8

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that the fact of overpayment has been established. 

The evidence of record indicates that, while appellant was receiving wage-loss 

compensation benefits under FECA, she was also receiving SSA age-related retirement benefits 

based upon her federal service. A claimant cannot receive both compensation for wage-loss 

compensation benefits under FECA and SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to federal 

service for the same period.9 The information provided by SSA established that appellant received 

SSA age-related retirement benefits that were attributable to federal service during the period 

July 1, 2018 through August 15, 2020. Consequently, the fact of overpayment has been 

established.

The Board finds, however, that the case is not in posture for decision with respect to the 

amount of the overpayment. To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of SSA 

benefits that were attributable to federal service must be calculated. OWCP received 

documentation from SSA with respect to the specific amount of SSA age-related retirement 

benefits that were attributable to federal service. SSA provided its rate with FERS and without 

FERS for the period July 1, 2018 through August 15, 2020. However, OWCP received two 

FERS/SSA dual calculation transmittal forms, the first dated July 18, 2020 and the second dated 

August 13, 2020, with differing amounts of SSA benefits with FERS shown. It is required by 

statute and regulations to make findings of fact and provide a statement of reasons.10 The Board 

has held that, in overpayment cases, it is essential that OWCP provide the recipient of 

 

5

Id. at § 8116.

6

Id. at § 8129(a).

7

20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see R.R., Docket No. 19-0104 (issued March 9, 2020); T.B., Docket No. 18-1449 (issued 

March 19, 2019); L.J., 59 ECAB 264 (2007).

8 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (issued February3, 1997).

9

20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see L.J., supra note 7.

10 See M.M., Docket No. 19-1914 (issued April9, 2021); 5 U.S.C. § 8124(a) provides that OWCP shall determine 

and make a finding of fact and an award for or against payment of compensation. 20 C.F.R. § 10.126 provides that 

OWCP s final decision shall contain findings of fact and a statement of reasons. See also H.B., Docket No. 19-0356 

(issued March20, 2020).
5

compensation with a clear statement showing how the overpayment was calculated. Although the 

record establishes that appellant received SSA age-related retirement benefits which were 

attributable to her federal service, it is not clear how the amount of the overpayment was derived.

OWCP has not offered an explanation for the discrepancy in the SSA benefit figures of record and 

used in its calculations. 

For these reasons, the Board finds that there is a question regarding whether the 

overpayment was calculated correctly for the period July 1, 2018 through August 15, 2020. 

Accordingly, the Board finds that the case must be remanded to OWCP. On remand OWCP shall 

clarify the discrepancy between the figures provided by SSA to OWCP. It shall then determine 

the amount of the overpayment of compensation and issue a new preliminary overpayment 

determination. Following this, and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP 

shall issue a de novo decision.11

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that fact of overpayment is established. The Board further finds that the 

case is not in posture for decision regarding the amount of the overpayment.12

 

11 See S.H., Docket No. 20-1189 (issued January 27, 2021).

12 In light of the Board’s disposition of Issue 1, Issues 2 and 3 are rendered moot.
6

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the January 4, 2021 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed in part and set aside in part. This case is remanded 

for further proceedings consistent with this decision of the Board.

Issued: September 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board