alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 308 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5301 

[Report No. 111–539] 

To extend the period during which the Administrator of the Environmental 

Protection Agency and States are prohibited from requiring a permit 

under section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for certain 

discharges that are incidental to normal operation of vessels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself, Mr. MICA, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. JONES, Mr. COBLE, 

and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 15, 2010 

Additional sponsors: Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, and Mr. WALDEN

JULY 15, 2010 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5301 RH

A BILL 

To extend the period during which the Administrator of 

the Environmental Protection Agency and States are prohibited from requiring a permit under section 402 of 

the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for certain discharges that are incidental to normal operation of vessels. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5301 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL OPER4 ATION OF VESSELS. 

5 Public Law 110–299 (122 Stat. 2995, 33 U.S.C. 

6 1342 note) is amended in section 2(a) by striking ‘‘during 

7 the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 

8 this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘during the period beginning on 

9 the date of enactment of this Act and ending December 

10 18, 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 308 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5301 

[Report No. 111–539] 

A BILL 

To extend the period during which the Adminisincidental to normal operation of vessels. lution Control Act for certain discharges that are mit under section 402 of the Federal Water Pol- and States are prohibited from requiring a per- trator of the Environmental Protection Agency 

JULY 15, 2010 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<Page>


                                                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
(and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
Registration Statement File No. 333-19607 for Hartford Life and Annuity
Insurance Company Separate Account One on Form N-4.


Hartford, Connecticut                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
April 8, 2002
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SIDNEY BRUCE HOGSED

No. 6829SC454

(Filed 15 January 1969)

Criminal Law § 166— appellant’s brief

Failure of defendant’s brief to comply with Rule 28 of tbe Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals in that the brief does not contain, properly numbered, the several grounds of exception and assignment of error with reference to the pages of the record, and the authorities relied on, classified under each assignment, subjects the appeal to dismissal. Rule 48 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals.

Appeal by defendant from *Martin, (Harry C.), J.,*July 1968 Session of Superior Court of TRANSylvania County.

Defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with the misdemeanor of operating a motor vehicle on the public highways while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. Upon his plea of not guilty, trial was by jury. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged.

From a judgment imposing a one-hundred-dollar fine and requiring the defendant to pay the cost and surrender his driver’s license, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General T. W. Bruton, Assistant Attorney General William W. Melvin, and Staff Attorney T. Buie Costen for the State.*

*Hamlin, Potts & Hudson by Jack H. Potts for the defendant.*

MORRIS, J.

The brief of the defendant appellant does not comply with the provisions of Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals in that it does not contain, properly numbered, the several grounds of exception and assignment of error with reference to the pages of the record, and the authorities relied on, classified under each assignment. Rule 48 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals reads: “If these rules are not complied with, the appeal may be dismissed.” This case is, therefore, subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the rules. The Attorney General has made a motion to dismiss on the grounds of this failure to comply with the rules. *State v. Floyd,*241 N.C. 79, 84 S.E. 2d 299; *Shepard v. Oil & Fuel Co.,*242 N.C. 762, 89 S.E. 2d 464.

However, instead of dismissing it, we have examined the exceptions and assignments of error in the record and find no prejudicial *482error. The issue was primarily one of fact, and the jury’s verdict was against the defendant.

No error.

MallaRD, C.J., and Campbell, J., concur.
|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,      2008 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1034 as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August      12, 2008 |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   |
| By:                               | /s/      Vincent      Rossi                                                  |
|                                   | Vincent      Rossi |
|                                   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                                   | Acting      Chief Financial Officer |

----
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.H., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, MINOT 

AIR FORCE BASE, Minot AFB, ND, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1179

Issued: August 27, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On May 24, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from an August 28, 2020 decision of the Office 

of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned 

Docket No. 21-1179.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the August 28, 2020 decision was February 24, 2021. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until May 24, 2021, more than 180 days after the

August 28, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-1179 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1179 is dismissed.

Issued: August 27, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Vincent Rossi, Chief Financial Officer of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (the Small Business
Issuer), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



| | (1) | the Small Business Issuers Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), to which this statement is filed as an
exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034 as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                               
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2007
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Vincent Rossi             
|                         |  | Vincent Rossi                 
|                         |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David B.
McWilliams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and   results of
      operations of the Company.


Date:
      March 17, 2008
              
              By:/s/David B.
      McWilliamsDavid
      B. McWilliamsPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7687

SIMON ALLEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN LOUIS,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

GREENWOOD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; GREENWOOD SOLICITOR, 

Office; B. WARE; N. FUTCH; R. COKER; TONY DAVIS; LONNIE 

SMITH; RONNIE POWELL; C. RAYAN JOHNSON; WALTER RUTLEDGE; 

BROOKS; WILLIAM KAY; DAVID M. STUMBO,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (8:15-cv-00363-RMG)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Simon Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Carly Marie Harter, Russell 

W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South 
2

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Simon Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Allen’s 

motion for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and 

grant Louis summary judgment on Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

claim against Louis.* Allen’s failure to challenge on appeal the 

district court’s dispositive holdings amounts to a waiver of 

appellate review of those holdings. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The 

Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal 

brief.”); United States v. Al-Hamdi, 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th 

Cir. 2004) (“It is a well settled rule that contentions not 

raised in the argument section of the opening brief are 

abandoned.”). Because we find no reversible error by the 

district court, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Allen 

v. Louis, No. 8:15-cv-00363-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court previously dismissed, without 

prejudice, Allen’s claims against the remaining Defendants. 

Allen does not challenge this prior order on appeal.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert S. Prather, Jr., certify that: 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bull Run Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures as of August 31, 2004 (the Evaluation Date) and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date; andc)
    
    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    November 29, 2004Signed:
    
    /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.Robert S. Prather, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.43


   

  Exhibit 10.43

   

  CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) IS THE TYPE THAT VIR BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.

   

  		
	AMENDMENT INFORMATION

	Agreement to be Amended:
	Grant agreement between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Vir Biotechnology Inc effective March 16, 2018, as amended, and bearing Investment ID INV-009475/OPP1182112

	Amendment Purpose:
	No Cost Extension 

	Amendment Date:
	Date of this email  

	Amended “End Date”:
	The term of the Agreement is extended by changing the End Date to March 31, 2022



    

  							
	THIS AMENDMENT amends, and is made part of, the above-referenced Agreement and is effective as of the date of this email. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meaning provided in the Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.

	 

	  
UPDATED REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

	This Amendment notifies You that the reporting and/or payment schedule for Your grant has changed. Your updated Reporting & Payment Schedule is deleted and replaced with the following: 

	  

	REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE 
	  

	Investment Period
	Target, Milestone, or Reporting Deliverable
	Due By
	Payment Date
	Payment Amount (U.S.$)
	  

	  
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	  

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	  

	  
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	  

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	  
	  
	  

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 
	 
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 
	 
	 

	 
	[***]
	 
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	  
	  
	  

	Total Grant Amount 
	Up to $14,882,418.08
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5133 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Frank 

T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. Schwarz Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. LOBIONDO, 

Mr. SIRES, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. LANCE, Mr. 

ADLER of New Jersey, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. HOLT, Mr. PASCRELL, and Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New Jersey, as 

the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal 

Michael A. Schwarz Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5133 IH

1 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT FRANK T. CARVILL AND 

2 LANCE CORPORAL MICHAEL A. SCHWARZ 

3 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New 

6 Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff Ser7 geant Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. 

8 Schwarz Post Office Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Frank 

13 T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. Schwarz Post 

14 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 14, 2009 | By:    |   | /s/      Neil K.    Warma         |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Neil      K. Warma                                                        |
|                    |   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                |
|                    |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                                        |
|                    |   |   | Acting      Chief Financial Officer                                       |
|                    |   |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)                          |
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the Company) and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of an amendment to the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 (the Report). Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 15, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.F.O., certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: September 28, 2009 |                  |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                          |                  |
| Signature:                    | /s/  Larry G. Badgley |   |
| Larry G. Badgley,  C.F.O.     |                  |
|                               |                       |  |

 

----