alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration published a 
notice in the Federal Register of September 29, 2005 (70 FR 56926-
56927) announcing an Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation 
meeting on November 3-4 2005. The notice is being amended to change 
type of meeting, place, dates, and time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sherry Whipple at 301-443-2764 or 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6714100f0e17170b02270f15140649000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fece8f7f6efeff3fadff7edecfeb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 29, 2005, in FR Doc. 05-19431, 
on page 56927, 1ST column, under the heading Summary, 8th line, change 
to read:
    The meeting will be an Audio Conference Call on November 1, 2005, 
from 12 noon to 4 p.m. EST. To access the conference call, call the USA 
Toll Free Number 888-791-2132 and enter the Passcode ``ACOT.'' The 
conference call leader is Dr. James Burdick.

    Dated: October 18, 2005.
Tina M. Cheatham,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 05-21244 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32000R1559

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1559/2000 of 17 July 2000 fixing for the 2000/01 marketing year the buying-in price to be applied by storage agencies for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs***Official Journal L 179 , 18/07/2000 P. 0009 - 0009*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1559/2000

of 17 July 2000

fixing for the 2000/01 marketing year the buying-in price to be applied by storage agencies for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2701/1999(2), and in particular Article 9(8) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The criteria for fixing the price at which storage agencies buy in unprocessed dried figs and unprocessed dried grapes are laid down in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 and the conditions on which the storage agencies buy in and manage the products are laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1622/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the scheme for the storage of unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs(3). The buying-in price should therefore be fixed for the 2000/01 marketing year on the basis, for dried grapes, of the evolution in world prices and, for dried figs, of the minimum price laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1558/2000 of 17 July 2000 fixing for the 2000/01 marketing year the minimum price to be paid to producers for unprocessed dried figs and the amount of production aid for dried figs(4).

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for products Processed from Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2000/01 marketing year, the buying-in price referred to in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be:

- EUR 46,910 per 100 kg net for unprocessed dried grapes,

- EUR 58,444 per 100 kg net for unprocessed dried figs.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 327, 21.12.1999, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 192, 24.7.1999, p. 33.

(4) See page 8 of this Official Journal.
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. James Richard SIKES et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 72-1067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 21, 1972.

Bradley C. Miles, San Angelo, Tex., Court-appointed for Sikes.

Tom Webb, San Angelo, Tex., Court-appointed for Jenkins.

W. Truett Smith, San Angelo, Tex., Court-appointed for Mashburn.

Melvin Gray, San Angelo, Tex., Court-appointed for Sanders.

Eldon B. Mahon, U. S. Atty., John G. Truelson, Conard L. Florence, Cecil Emerson, Asst. U. S. Attys., for appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

 It has been made known to the Court as a fact, supported by the official death certificate of the State of Texas, that appellant Joseph Earl Mashburn in the above-styled and numbered appeal died in Brownwood, Texas, on February 14, 1972. Since a criminal prosecution abates *ab initio*upon the death of an appellant, the case must be remanded with directions to the district court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment as to appellant Mashburn. Durham v. United States, 1971, 401 U.S. 481, 91 S.Ct. 858, 28 L.Ed.2d 200; United States v. Askew, 5 Cir. 1971, 441 F.2d 258.

Reversed and remanded.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5251 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 

tax for birth mothers whose children are adopted. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mrs. SCHMIDT (for herself, Mr. CAO, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

credit against tax for birth mothers whose children are 

adopted. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motherhood Fairness 

5 Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR BIRTH MOTHERS WHOSE CHILDREN 

7 ARE ADOPTED. 

8 (a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—Subsection (c) of sec9 tion 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5251 IH

1 qualifying child) is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR BIRTH MOTHER

4 WHOSE CHILD IS ADOPTED.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a tax6 payer who is a qualified birth mother with re7 spect to a child, the term ‘qualifying child’ 

8 means the child born, and formally placed for 

9 adoption, during the taxable year. 

10 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED BIRTH MOTHER.—For 

11 purposes of subparagraph (A), the term ‘quali12 fied birth mother’ means an individual who 

13 gives birth to the child described in subpara14 graph (A). 

15 ‘‘(C) CREDIT ALLOWED TO BOTH BIRTH

16 MOTHER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT.—Notwith17 standing paragraph (1) and section 152(c), the 

18 credit under subsection (a) with respect to a 

19 child described in subparagraph (A) for the tax20 able year shall be allowed to both the qualified 

21 birth mother of such child and the taxpayer 

22 who adopts such child.’’. 

23 (b) IDENTIFICATION.—Subsection (e) of section 24 of 

24 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘For purposes of the preceding sentence, the Secretary 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5251 IH

1 shall issue guidance on appropriate identification of chil2 dren with respect to whom a credit is allowed under this 

3 section by reason of subsection (c)(3).’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 23, 2007                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Mineral Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter period ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Simon Mu,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.




Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.




Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            /s/
                Simon
                Mu
              Simon
                Mu
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.5

(Translation)

No. 00221752







(National emblem)





CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF ENTERPRISES WITH

INVESTMENT OF TAIWAN, HONGKONG, MACAO AND 

OVERSEAS CHINESE IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA







Approval No:            WJM JZZ (2002) 042

Import & Export Enterprise Code: 1100600095779

Date of Approval: January 18, 2002

Date of Issuance: January 18, 2002 

(Stamped: People's Government of Beijing)

 

 

	
Company's name
	
Chinese
	
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ 

	
English
	
ChinaE-Online Ltd.

	
Address of company
	
No 43, Mentougou Road, Mentougou District, Beijing City 

	
Type of company
	
Sino-foreign cooperative joint venture
	
Duration of operation
	
25 years

	
Total amount of Investment 
	
US$ 1.5 Million 

	
Registered capital
	
US$ 1.5 Million

	
Name of Investors
	
Place of registration
	
Amount of capital contribution

	
Party A: Computing Center of MOFTEC

Party B:  JADEPEAR INVESTMENT LIMITED

Party C: CHINA INTRIC LIMITED 
	
China

Hong Kong

Hong Kong
	
US$0.000

US$ 1.35 Million

US$0.15 Million

	
Scope of business
	
to develop computer & Internet telecom technology, produce the software and hardware products of such technology; provide consulting service on E-business information & Internet technology and sell its self-made products.




 

 

 

	
I, Chen Mingmian, hereby certify that this is true and correct English translation of the attached Chinese document to the best of my knowledge and ability.

Date:   January 31, 2002

/s/ "Chen Mingmian"   

Chen Mingmian

Certified Translator, B. C. Canada
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131128 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. SHELLY BEYER, BONNIE RIOS, JOE RIOS, Stephen J. Markman, and GERALD SZCZEPANIAK, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 131128 COA: 258504 Ingham CC: 03-000433-CZ VERIZON NORTH, INC. and CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC., d/b/a GTE SYSTEMS OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### ROBERT WALLACE MOEN, JOSEPH FRANK VILLANI and FRED ANGELOH, Appellants, v. LAS VEGAS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC., Formerly Known as NEVADA INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC., Doing Business as the LAS VEGAS HILTON; JAMES NEWMAN; BUD HAINES and BARRON HILTON, Respondents.

No. 7431

April 19, 1974

521 P.2d 370

*Robert K. Dorsey,*of Las Vegas, for Appellants.

*Lionel Sawyer Collins & Wartman,*and *Steve Morris,*of Las Vegas, for Respondents.

*177OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

Robert Wallace Moen, Joseph Frank Villani and Fred Angeloh are three 21 dealers formerly employed by the Las Vegas Hilton Hotel in Las Vegas. They were discharged in June of 1972 at a time when the Clark County Sheriff’s office was investigating a cheating ring said to be operating within the county. Extensive news coverage attended the investigation. While it was in progress several dealers and management of some of the casinos in the area were interrogated by investigators from the sheriff’s department.

Appellants were discharged at the time the investigation was under way. They brought these combined actions upon their asserted claims that each of them was wrongfully discharged from his employment, falsely imprisoned and maliciously defamed because of their alleged or implied association with the cheating ring.

1. None of the appellants alleges use of force, threats or violence against him and all of them acknowledge that they submitted to questioning and that their only fear was the loss of their jobs.

Submission to mere verbal direction of another unaccompanied by force or threats of any character does not constitute false imprisonment. Lerner Shops v. Marin, 83 Nev. 75, 423 P.2d 398 (1967); NRS 200.460(1). Apprehension that one might in the future lose one’s job or be prosecuted for theft is not force or the threat of force which is necessary to establish false imprisonment. Roberts v. Coleman, 365 P.2d 79 (Ore. 1961).

2. Moen, Villani and Angeloh charged the respondents with having made false and defamatory statements affecting their professional reputations. The record does not substantiate their accusations. The most that can be discerned is that whatever comments were made, if any, were spoken by sheriff’s deputies who were acting independently of these respondents. *178Even though the three dealers were discharged during a-well-publicized investigation into cheating, the fact of discharge by itself does not amount to a slanderous accusation. Wells v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc., 474 F.2d 838 (5th Cir. 1973). The timing of a discharge is not alone sufficient to support an action of slander.

Other issues raised are equally without merit. The appellants were unable to set forth specific facts showing there was a genuine issue for trial. The summary judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Thompson, C. J., and Mowbray, Gunderson, and Bat-jer, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of International Aluminum Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.         The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  February 7, 2006 | RONALD L. RUDY                                                  |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Ronald L. Rudy                                                  |
|                    | President and                                                   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer                                         |
|                    |                                                            |
| Date:  February 7, 2006 | MITCHELL K. FOGELMAN                                            |   |
|                    | Mitchell K. Fogelman                                            |   |
|                    | Senior Vice President – Financeand Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                         |                                                                 |        |  |

 

20

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60786-60787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1415


Termination Of Foreign-Trade Subzone 74A, Sparrows Point, 
Maryland

    Pursuant to the authority granted in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act 
of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board has adopted the following order:
    Whereas, on March 14, 1985, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board issued a 
grant of authority to the City of Baltimore (the City), authorizing the 
establishment of Foreign-Trade Subzone 74A at the Baltimore Marine 
Industries Inc. facility, Sparrows Point, Maryland (Board Order 290, 50 
FR 13057, 4/2/85);
    Whereas, the City advised the Board on December 13, 2004 (FTZ 
Docket 2-2005), that zone procedures were no longer needed at the 
facility and

[[Page 60787]]

requested voluntary termination of Subzone 74A;
    Whereas, the request has been reviewed by the FTZ Staff and Customs 
officials, and approval has been recommended;
    Now, therefore, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board terminates the 
subzone status of Subzone 74A, effective this date.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of October 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20932 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
rcx10a




	TO:    The Securities and Exchange Commission
	Washington, D.C. 20549
	 
	RE:    Reconstruction Data Group, Inc.









INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Reconstruction Data Group, Inc. on Form SB-1, Amendment 4 of our report dated April 2, 2002 on the financial statements of Reconstruction Data Group, Inc., appearing in the prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.



We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Reconstruction Data Group, Inc. on Form SB-1, Amendment 4 of our report dated May 4, 2001 on the financial statements of ARC Network, appearing in the prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.



We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.






	\S\ Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
	Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
	Denver, Colorado
	April 8, 2002
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.C., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. 

MILITARY ACADEMY, West Point, NY, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1246

Issued: September 29, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On August 16, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a January 28, 2021 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-1246.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the January 28, 2021 decision was July 27, 2021. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until August 16, 2021, more than 180 days after the

January 28, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-1246 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1246 is dismissed.

Issued: September 29, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).