alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5139 

To provide for the International Organizations Immunities Act to be extended 

to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina 

and the International Civilian Office in Kosovo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2010 

Mr. BERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the International Organizations Immunities 

Act to be extended to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International 

Civilian Office in Kosovo. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extending Immunities 

5 to the Office of the High Representative and the Inter6 national Civilian Office in Kosovo Act of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5139 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 

2 IMMUNITIES ACT. 

3 The International Organizations Immunities Act (22 

4 U.S.C. 288 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 17. OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTATIVE IN BOS7 NIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND THE INTER8 NATIONAL CIVILIAN OFFICE IN KOSOVO; EX9 TENSION OF PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES. 

10 ‘‘The provisions of this title may be extended to the 

11 Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and 

12 Herzegovina (and to its officers and employees) or the 

13 International Civilian Office in Kosovo (and to its officers 

14 and employees) in the same manner, to the same extent, 

15 and subject to the same conditions, as they may be ex16 tended to a public international organization in which the 

17 United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under 

18 the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such par19 ticipation or making an appropriation for such participa20 tion. Any such extension may provide for the provisions 

21 of this title to extend to officers and employees of the Of22 fice of the High Representative in Bosnia and 

23 Herzegovina, or officers and employees of the Inter24 national Civilian Office in Kosovo, even after that Office 

25 has been dissolved.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
32(b)**
 
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New River Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending April 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish
S. Krishnan, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/
      Krish
      S. KrishnanKrish
      S. KrishnanChief
      Operating Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      financial and accounting officer)May
      11, 2005
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23.2


                                 July 8, 1997


                    INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS CONSENT
                    ---------------------------------------

The undersigned firm of Independent Petroleum Engineers, of Calgary, Alberta,
Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared a Constant Dollar evaluation
effective March 31, 1996, dated June 6, 1996, of the interests of Territorial
Resources, Inc., and hereby gives its consent to the use of its name and to the
use of the same estimates.


                                     DL PADDOCK & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

                                     /s/ D. L. Paddock

                                     D. L. Paddock, P. Eng.
                                     President
#### CHARLIE SHELBY, Petitioner, *v.*THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, in and for the County of Pershing, and THE HONORABLE MERWYN H. BROWN, Judge Thereof, Presiding, Respondents.

No. 5094

September 14, 1966

418 P.2d 132

*J. Rayner Kjeldsen,*of Reno, for Petitioner.

*Roland W. Belanger,*Pershing County District Attorney, of Lovelock, for Respondents.

*214OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

In seeking a rehearing on the recent decision rendered by this court in Shelby v. District Court, 82 Nev. 204, 414 P.2d 942 (1966), the respondents cite a single sentence of dictum1 from Ex parte Stearns, 68 Nev. 155, 227 P.2d 971 (1951), also cited in Ex parte Colton, 72 Nev. 83, 295 P.2d 383 (1956). That dictum is inconsistent with the holding of the court in the Stearns case, supra, and conflicts with our expressions in Shelby, supra.

In both the Eureka Bank cases, 35 Nev. 80, 126 P. 655, 129 P. 308 (1912) and Ex parte Stearns, supra, this court held that the writ of habeas corpus was the proper method for seeking relief from a grand jury indictment which was not based upon “reasonable or probable cause,” and that the court “can inquire whether any substantial evidence exists which, if true, would support a verdict of conviction, for if there is none the grand jury has exceeded its powers, and the indictment is void.” Ex parte Colton, supra, Ex parte Stearns, supra, and the Eureka Bank cases, supra, all stand for the proposition that the prosecution, if it elects to proceed by grand jury presentment or grand jury indictment, must assume the burden of showing the existence of reasonable or probable cause to hold the accused for trial, if challenged on that ground. In the instant case we held that showing cannot be made in the absence of a transcript of the testimony of the witnesses.

Further, under the statute, NRS 172.260 (2), the grand jury “can receive none but legal evidence, and the best *215evidence in degree, to the exclusion of hearsay or secondary evidence.” Under this mandate, a person who had been indicted by the grand jury could challenge the indictment and test the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the grand jury indictment as to whether it was in fact “the best evidence” rather than mere “hearsay or secondary evidence.”

The inconsistent statement of dictum contained in Ex parte Stearns, supra, is expressly disapproved.

Rehearing denied.

Zenoff, D. J., concurs.

1

 It reads: “There is no doubt that inquiry upon habeas corpus may not be extended to determine the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury to warrant a finding of an indictment.” Id., at 157.

Collins, J.,

dissenting:

I would grant the rehearing.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xtra-Gold Resources
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, PAUL ZYLA, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                    
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (b) | the information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date:May 12, 2011 | s/s Paul
      Zyla
|----------------- | -------------------
|                  |                    
|                  | By                 
|                  |                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to and will be retained by our company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act              of              1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report              fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition              and              results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/                Daniel P. Foley     |
|----------------------------------------|
| Daniel                P. Foley         |
| Chief                Financial Officer |
| February                14, 2007       |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,877
<PP&E>                                         266,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,811)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,913
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,757
<SALES>                                         44,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,576
<CGS>                                           30,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,548
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.25
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 4, 2005, 1:30 p.m. to 
October 4, 2005, 2:30 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, 
Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the Federal Register on 
September 16, 2005, 70 FR 54760-54762.
    The meeting will be held November 3, 2005 at the National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20882. The 
meeting time remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 21, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21670 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of AFP Imaging Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I David Vozick, Co-Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/       David Vozick


David Vozick,
Chairman of the Board
Co-Principal Executive Officer
September 27, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH 
FLOWS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,666
<INVENTORY>                                    226,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               447,019
<PP&E>                                         351,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 767,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          280,237
<BONDS>                                        162,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   767,435
<SALES>                                        661,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               661,123
<CGS>                                          612,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  612,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (8,601)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,301)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.30)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                   |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BULL RUN CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         142,097
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,063,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,841,251
<PP&E>                                          37,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,402,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,927,715
<BONDS>                                     41,998,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       225,827
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,830,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,402,338
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               680,536
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (2,716,261)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,971,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,031,591)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,538,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (234,126)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,772,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
August 9, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM PRICE, SR. AND HAITH AM BAQDOUN ES , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 15

- 00508

- CV V.

LUIS SANCHEZ
, Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Luis Sanchez, signed May 13, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment

. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellee, Luis Sanchez, take nothing on his claims for conversion and attorney’s fees. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Luis Sanchez

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.14.1

                  CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Pursuant to Section 7.5 of the Employment Agreement dated as of August
10, 2000, between Heritage Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Heritage"),
and the undersigned (the "Employee"), the undersigned Employee does hereby
consent and agree to (i) the assignment of said Employment Agreement by Heritage
to U.S. Propane, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("U.S. Propane"), and U.S.
Propane's assumption of the duties and responsibilities of Heritage arising
under said Employment Agreement.

         DATED as of February 3, 2002.



                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Thomas H. Rose
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>    5
          <MULTIPLIER>      1,000
                 
          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997 
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997 
          <PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997 
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
          <CASH>                                                    18,663 
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0 
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            320,140 
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              19,276 
          <INVENTORY>                                              288,052 
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         632,957 
          <PP&E>                                                   433,894 
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           135,288 
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,288,631 
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    153,675 
          <BONDS>                                                  567,800 
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0 
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0 
          <COMMON>                                                  61,467 
          <OTHER-SE>                                               276,040 
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,288,631 
          <SALES>                                                  449,861 
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         449,861 
          <CGS>                                                    326,187 
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                            326,187 
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0 
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           1,530 
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         9,089 
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           27,350 
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              10,291 
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       17,059 
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0 
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0 
          <CHANGES>                                                      0 
          <NET-INCOME>                                              17,059 
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.27 
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.27 
                  
          
</TABLE>