alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,850
<PP&E>                                          98,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,489
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,077
<SALES>                                        113,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,089
<CGS>                                           81,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (84)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of theundersigned officers does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to suchofficers knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Authority.

 
| By:                     | /s/ SHAWN S. SMYTH     |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Shawn S. Smyth          |                   |
| Chief Executive Officer |                   |
| November 19, 2008  |                   |
|                    |                   |
| By:                     | /s/ JOSEPH R. CALLAHAN |   |
| Joseph R. Callahan      |                   |
| Chief Financial Officer |                   |
| November 19, 2008  |                   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the RiverRock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the Authority andfurnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

----
SCPW-20-0000560
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

ISAIAH W. MCCOY, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE TODD W. EDDINS, Judge of the Circuit Court of the

First Circuit, State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge, and
STATE OF HAWAI # I and FRANCIS SEQUEIRA, Warden, O # ahu Community Correctional Center, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 1CPC-19-0001279)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND MOTION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kuriyama, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Isaiah W. McCoy’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on September 11, 2020, the motion, filed on September 24, 2020, the respective supporting documents, and the record, it cannot be said that the respondent judge committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion in revoking bail under the specific facts and Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000560 01-OCT-2020 08:57 AMcircumstances of this case, or that petitioner is entitled to the

requested extraordinary relief from this court. See, e.g., HRS §§ 804-3(b) and 804-7.3 ; Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion are denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas corpus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 1, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Christine E. Kuriyama

2
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, FRANKFORD POST 

OFFICE, Philadelphia, PA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0757

Issued: May 25, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On April 7, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from an August 20, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0757.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the August 20, 2020 decision was February 16, 2021. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until April 7, 2021, more than 180 days after the

August 20, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0757 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0757 is dismissed.

Issued: May 25, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE
OF MONTANA DA 20-0396
and DA 20-0397 MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
and TAYLOR BLOSSOM, RYAN FILZ, MADELINE NEUMEYER,

and REBECCA WEED, individual electors,

Eg 

## AUG

1

1 

### 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk

of Supreme Court State

of Montana Plaintiffs

and Appellees, v.

ORDER STATE
OF MONTANA,

by and through

its SECRETARY

OF STATE, COREY STAPLETON, Defendant

and Appellant. Defendant

and Appellant Secretary

of State moves

to consolidate
these two appeals and to order
an expedited briefing schedule

in order

to have the appeals decided prior

to the August
20, 2020 deadline

for the Secretary

of State

to certify
for the November 2020 general election ballot the names and designations

of statewide candidates

to election administrators. Section 13-12-201(1), MCA. Both appeals

are taken frorn
an August

7, 2020 order
of the First Judicial District Court directing

the Secretary

of State
to strike from the general election ballot the narnes

of Montana Green Party candidates
who advanced after the June
2, 2020 primary election. Also

at issue are the unsuccessful intervention motions

of the Montana Republican Party, Lorrie Campbell,

and Jill Loven. Plaintiff
and Appellee

the Montana Dernocratic
Party opposes consolidation

of the two appeals
but agrees with the Secretary

of State's proposed expedited briefing schedule

in DA 20-0396
and indicates
that

it will comply with any briefing schedule

set by the Court. Having considered

the parties' submissions,

and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the Motion

to Consolidate Appeals

is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

that the request

for an expedited briefing schedule

is08/11/2020Case Number: DA 20-0396GRANTEDforbothDA20-0396andDA20-0397.Ineachcase,thepartiesshallfiletheirbriefsaccordingtothefollowingschedule:Appellant'sopeningbriefshallbefiledbyAugust12,2020.Appellees'responsebriefshallbefiledbyAugust17,2020.Appellant'sreplybriefshallbefiledbyAugust18,2020.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatproposedintervenorstheMontanaRepublicanParty,LorrieCampbell,andJillLovenareGRANTEDleavetofileamicusbriefsinaccordancewithM.R.App.P.11(4)(a)and12(7).AnyamicusbriefsmustbefiledbyAugust12,2020.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthattheLewisandClarkCountyClerkofDistrictCourtisdirectedtotransrnittherecordimmediatelyuponreceiptofthisOrder.TheClerkofthisCourtisdirectedtofilethisOrderineachoftheabove-referencedcasesandtoprovideimmediatenoticeofitsentrytoallcounselofrecordandtotheLewisandClarkCountyClerkofDistrictCourt.DATEDthist(ayofAugust,2020.ChiefJustice2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5014 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5014

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To clarify the health care provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
              that constitutes minimum essential coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY OF 
VETERANS AFFAIRS THAT CONSTITUTES MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.
    (a) In General.--Clause (v) of section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended to read as 
follows:
                ``(v) a health care program under chapter 17 or 18 of 
            title 38, United States Code, as determined by the 
            Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the 
            Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
            Secretary,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in section 1501(b) of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 963/2004

of 12 May 2004         

fixing the import duties in the rice sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1503/96 of 29 July 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 as regards import duties in the rice sector (2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the rice sector referred to in Article 11(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 are fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

(2)OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2294/2003 (OJ L 340, 24.12.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties on rice and broken rice

----

(1)  The duty on imports of rice originating in the ACP States is applicable, under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 (OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5) and amended Commission Regulation (EC) No 638/2003 (OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 3).

(2)  In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1706/98, the duties are not applied to products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and imported directly into the overseas department of Réunion.

(3)  The import levy on rice entering the overseas department of Réunion is specified in Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95.

(4)  The duty on imports of rice not including broken rice (CN code 1006 40 00), originating in Bangladesh is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 (OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 1) and amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 862/91 (OJ L 88, 9.4.1991, p. 7).

(5)  No import duty applies to products originating in the OCT pursuant to Article 101(1) of amended Council Decision 91/482/EEC (OJ L 263, 19.9.1991, p. 1).

(6)  For husked rice of the Basmati variety originating in India and Pakistan, a reduction of EUR/t 250 applies (Article 4a of amended Regulation (EC) No 1503/96).

(7)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

(8)  The duty on imports of rice originating in and coming from Egypt is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2184/96 (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 196/97 (OJ L 31, 1.2.1997, p. 53).

----

ANNEX II

Calculation of import duties for rice

----

(1)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5231 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who enter 

into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic illegal 

controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in conduct 

within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside the 

United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that 

persons who enter into a conspiracy within the United 

States to possess or traffic illegal controlled substances 

outside the United States, or engage in conduct within 

the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside 

the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the 

United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5231 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Trafficking Safe 

3 Harbor Elimination Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 

5 ACT TO CLARIFY CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED 

6 WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE CRIMI7 NALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES. 

8 Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 846) is amended by— 

10 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any’’; and 

11 (2) inserting at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires 

13 with one or more persons, or aids or abets one or more 

14 persons, regardless of where such other persons are lo15 cated, to commit at any place outside the United States 

16 an act that would constitute a violation of this title if com17 mitted within the United States, shall be subject to the 

18 same penalties that would apply to such act if it were to 

19 occur within the United States.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.25    
  


January 29,
2002 


Ms. Michelle
Moratti

21 Jean Court

Greenlawn, New York 11740 


Dear
Michelle, 


This
letter confirms the agreement between TenFold Corporation ("TenFold") and Michelle Moratti
("Moratti") to amend the Employment Agreement, entered into as of August 1, 2001, between TenFold and Moratti (the
"Agreement"), as follows (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement): 



Section 4(i) of
the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


"DEPOSITED FUNDS. The Company agrees to deposit into a separate Company bank account one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) (the "Deposited Funds"). In
the event that prior to August 20, 2002, (a) a voluntary receiver, voluntary trustee, or other voluntary custodian is applied for, consented to, or appointed for the Company or its
assets, (b) an involuntary application proceeding for a receiver, trustee or other custodian for the Company is initiated by a third party, and such involuntary application proceeding is not
dismissed within 60 days after the initiation thereof, (c) the Company becomes insolvent or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, (d) the Company is liquidated or
dissolved, (e) or any proceedings are commenced by or against the Company under any bankruptcy, insolvency or debtor's relief law, (f) or the Company begins to take action to effect any
of the foregoing (collectively, a "Release Condition"), Employee shall be entitled to the Deposited Funds and such Deposited Funds shall be deemed a signing bonus under the terms of this Agreement.
Employee's right to the Deposited Funds and the Company's obligation to maintain such a separate Company bank account expire if a Release Condition has not occurred by August 21, 2002." 


Except
as expressly amended by this letter agreement, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. All references to the Agreement in the Agreement or any other
document executed or delivered in connection therewith shall, from and after the effective date of this letter agreement, be deemed to be references to the Agreement, as amended hereby, unless the
context expressly requires otherwise. 


Please
acknowledge your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning this letter in the space provided below and returning one original to TenFold. The other original is for your retention. 


Sincerely,



Nancy
M. Harvey

President and CEO 


ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED: 



	
 Michelle Moratti	 	 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.25
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

HARRY S. TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Meeting of the Trustees and Officers of the 
Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation--Change of Meeting Date and Time

    The meeting date and time announced on October 3, 2005 (70 FR 
57599) has been changed. The meeting will now be held on November 16, 
2005 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Cannon House Office Building, Room 
121. The agenda remains unchanged.

Louis H. Blair,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-21185 Filed 10-19-05; 11:19 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AD-P
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas Gurkowski, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's

fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 31, 2006.



/s/ Thomas Gurkowski

_______________________

Thomas Gukowski

(Secretary/Treasurer and CFO)







---