alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Swallow, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 31, 2006.



/s/ John Swallow

_______________________

John Swallow

(CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)



---
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31986R1628

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1628/86 of 26 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1533/85 on the opening, allocation and administration of a Community tariff quota for certain eels falling within subheading ex 03.01 A II of the Common Customs Tariff***Official Journal L 144 , 29/05/1986 P. 0006 - 0006*

*****

COUNCIL  REGULATION (EEC) No 1628/86  

of 26 May 1986  

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1533/85 on the opening, allocation and administration of a Community tariff quota for certain eels falling within subheading ex 03.01 A II of the Common Customs Tariff  

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,  

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 28 thereof,  

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal,  

Having regard to the draft Regulation from the Commission,  

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 1533/85 (1) opened, for the period 1 July 1985 to 30 June 1986, a Community tariff quota for certain fresh eels (live or dead), chilled or frozen, falling within subheading ex 03.01 A II of the Common Customs Tariff, intended for processing by curing or skinning enterprises or for use in the industrial manufacture of products falling within heading No 16.04 of the said Tariff; whereas the Kingdom of Spian and the Portuguese Republic should participate in this tariff quota according to their respective needs as from 1 March 1986; whereas this participation can initially be confined to the possibility of drawing, from the Community reserve as formed, quantities corresponding to their immediate import needs from third countries,  

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:  

Article 1  

Regulation (EEC) No 1533/85 is hereby amended as follws:  

1. in Article 1 (2), the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:  

'Within the limits of this quota, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic shall apply customs duties calculated in accordance with the relevant provisions laid down in the Act of Accession.';  

2. Article 2 (3) shall be replaced by the following:  

'3. If an importer notifies the imminent import of the product in question in Greece or in Ireland from 1 January 1986, or in Spain or in Portugal from 1 March 1986, and requests the benefit of the quota, the Member State concerned shall inform the Commission and draw an amount corresponding to its needs to the extent that the available balance of the reserve so permits.'  

Article 2  

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.  

It shall apply with effect from 1 March 1986.  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.  

Done at Brussels, 26 May 1986.  

For the Council  

The President  

G. BRAKS  

(1) OJ No L 147, 6. 6. 1985, p. 10.
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF        2002**

| 1.     | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| /s/                  John Works          |
|------------------------------------------|
| John                  Works              |
| Chief                  Executive Officer |
| June                  29, 2007           |

----
##### 



Re:
    
    Credit and Security Agreement (the Credit Agreement) dated as of November 29,
2005, by and between Conexant USA, LLC (Purchaser), and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Lender (capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Credit Agreement)
       (a)
    
    Each of Purchaser and Seller shall have executed and delivered this letter; and(b)
    
    Wachovia shall be satisfied that the Policy remains in effect and comports with
the terms and conditions of the Program Documents.




---



##### 



original
 Very truly yours,
WACHOVIA BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION/s/ Brian J. FulkBrian J. Fulk,Director AGREEMENT:CONEXANT USA, LLC, as Purchaser
    
    
    
    CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., as Seller
and as ServicerBy:
    
    /s/ Kerry K. Petry
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Kerry K. PetryTitle:
    
    VP and Treasurer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    VP and TreasurerDate:
    
    11/22/06
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    11/22/06
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5168 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5168

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
homebuyer tax credit through December 31, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2010

Mr. Ellsworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
homebuyer tax credit through December 31, 2010, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 36(h) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``May 1, 2010'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2011''.
    (b) Binding Contract Exception.--Paragraph (2) of section 36(h) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 2010'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``January 1, 2011'', and
            (2) by striking ``July 1, 2010'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``March 1, 2011''.
    (c) Special Rule for Individuals on Qualified Official Extended 
Duty Outside the United States.--Paragraph (3) of section 36(h) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 2010'' in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A) and inserting ``January 1, 2011'',
            (2) by striking ```May 1, 2011' for `May 1, 2010''' and 
        inserting ```January 1, 2012' for `January 1, 2011''', and
            (3) by striking ```July 1, 2011' for `July 1, 2010''' and 
        inserting ```March 1, 2012' for `March 1, 2011'''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to residences purchased after April 30, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of Prospect Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Commission on the date hereof, I, John F. Barry III , Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Date:November 9, 2020/s/ JOHN F. BARRY IIIJohn F. Barry IIIChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Prospect Capital Corporation and will be retained by Prospect Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DENNIS FREDERICK MADDREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 157 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2020, the “Application for Extraordinary 

Relief/Kings [sic] Bench Authority” is DENIED.
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries and Jurisdictions



                             State or Other   Date of
                             Jurisdiction of  Incorporation,  Ownership
                             Incorporation    Organization    (Direct or
    Subsidiary               or Organization  or Acquisition  Indirect)
---------------------------  ---------------  --------------  ---------

1.Global Oro LLC                Delaware           2003          100%
2.Global Plata LLC              Delaware           2003          100%
3.Global Gold Mining LLC        Delaware           2003          100%
4.Global Gold Hankavan LLC       Armenia           2003          100%
5.Mego-Gold LLC                  Armenia           2005          100%
6.Getik Mining Company LLC       Armenia           2006           80%
7.Global Gold Uranium LLC       Delaware           2007          100%
8.Global Gold Armenia, LLC      Delaware           2003          100%
9.Global Gold Chile Limited        Chile           2004          100%
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6595

PAUL C. GORDON, a/k/a Troy Hilton, a/k/a Paul

Jappal, a/k/a Star, a/k/a "G",

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-85)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul C. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for the production of trial transcript at government expense.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Gordon v. United States, No. CR-93-85 (E.D.

Va. Apr. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.4

(Translation)




Beijing Mentougou District 

Commission of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade



MWJF (2002) No 001                                                              signed and issued by ZHAO Yujie



 

Upon examining the request that we received from your Center, it is decided that approval should be given to the taking effect of the Contract on establishment of a Cooperative Joint Venture - "ChinaE-Online Ltd" and the Articles of Association of the same Company, both documents having been jointly executed by your Center - Computing Center of MOFTEC (hereinafter "Party A"), Hong Kong Jadepear Investment Limited (hereinafter "Party B") and CHINA INTRIC LIMITED.  Approval should also be given to the composition of the Board of Directors.  The details of the approvals are given as below: 


1.  Total amount of investment: US$ 1.5 Million



2.  Registered capital: US$ 1.5 Million, which includes:  



Party A shall provide relevant professional supports as cooperative conditions which are not converted into values;



Party B shall contribute US$1.35 Million in cash, which takes up 90% of the total registered capital;



Party C shall contribute US$0.15 Million in cash, which accounts for 10% thereof.



3.  Legal address: No 43, Mentougou Road, Mentougou District, Beijing.



4.  Scope of business: to develop computer & internet telecom technology, produce the software and hardware products of such technology; provide consulting service on E-business information & internet technology and sell its self-made products.



5.  Scale of production & business: annual sales volume of US$1 Million.



6.  Duration of joint venture: 25 years.  The company shall reach a balance in foreign exchange by itself.



7.  Distribution of profits: Party A 10%, Party B 80% and Party C 10%



Please complete other relevant procedures according to this reply and notify the other parties of the joint venture as soon as possible.



Subject words: joint venture   contract   articles of association, reply



 


Beijing Mentougou District 

Commission of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade


January 8, 2002




	
I, Chen Mingmian, hereby certify that this is true and correct English translation of the attached Chinese document to the best of my knowledge and ability.

Date:   January 27, 2002

/s/ "Chen Mingmian"   

Chen Mingmian

Certified Translator, B. C. Canada
[Cite as State ex rel. Pryor v. Werren , 2017-Ohio-7668.]

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. NC LaFONSE PRYOR

Relator

-vsJUDGE CURT WERREN, CANTON MUNICIPAL COURT, et al. Respondents JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, J.

Case No. 2017 CA 00029

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Quo Warranto

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 18, 2017

APPEARANCES: For Relator For Respondents

NC LaFONSE PRYOR JOHN D. FERRERO PRO SE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY STARK COUNTY JAIL RONALD MARK CALDWELL 4500 Atlantic Boulevard, NE ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR Canton, Ohio 44705 110 Central Plaza South, Suite 510 Canton, Ohio 44702Stark County, Case No. 2017 CA 00029 2

Wise, John, J. {¶1} Petitioner, NC LaFonse Pryor, has filed a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto against Respondents Judges Curt Werren and Taryn L. Heath. Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. {¶2} Petitioner generally argues Respondents lack jurisdiction over his case due to an excessive bond and violation of various constitutional rights. {¶3} For a writ of quo warranto to issue, “a relator must establish (1) that the office is being unlawfully held and exercised by respondent, and (2) that relator is entitled

to the office.” State ex rel. Paluf v. Feneli (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 138, 141, 630 N.E.2d

708. {¶4} The Ohio Supreme Court has held, “‘[A]n action in quo warranto may be brought by an individual as a private citizen only when he personally is claiming title to a public office.’ ” State ex rel. Coyne v. Todia (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 232, 238, 543 N.E.2d 1271, quoting State ex rel. Annable v. Stokes (1970), 24 Ohio St.2d 32, 32-33, 53 O.O.2d 18, 262 N.E.2d 863. {¶5} “[D]ismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is appropriate if the complaint is frivolous or the claimant obviously cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint. State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Ingraham (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 230, 231, 718 N.E.2d 1285, 1287.” State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 316, 725 N.E.2d 663, 667.Stark County, Case No. 2017 CA 00029 3

{¶6} Petitioner does not aver in his Petition that he is entitled to the offices held by Respondents. For this reason, we find the petition lacks merit and dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

By: Wise, John, J. Gwin, P. J., and Wise, Earle, Jr., J., concur.

JWW/d 0830
Melesio RAMIREZ, Employee v. STUART PIERCE FARMS, INC., Employer, FCCI Insurance Group, Carrier

No. 214P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Francisco J. Bricio, Attorney at Law, Kathrine Bricio, Attorney at Law, for Ramirez, Melesio.

Trula R. Mitchell, Attorney at Law, Jack S. Holmes, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Emily Anne Smith, Attorney at Law, for Stuart Pierce Farms, Inc., et al.

Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Industrial Commission.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of July 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.40

                                PROMISSORY NOTE


AMOUNT: $200,000.00                                        DATE: MARCH 7, 2000


Twenty three days after date of receipt, for value received, the undersigned
(jointly and severally if more than one) promise(s) to pay to the order of:

                                 AccuRec LLC.

The sum of two hundred thousand dollars plus an interest equal to (8% annually)
           ----------------------------
payable at any place the holder may so designate. Interest to be paid at loan
pay off time.

The undersigned and any endorser or guarantors herefore, jointly and severally,
hereby agree that upon default in payment of performance of this note, or the
death, or any act of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of any of them,
however expressed or indicated, then this note shall, at the option of the
holder, become immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest
or further attorney and/or agent of the holder, and the undersigned, and any
endorser or guarantors, jointly and severally, agree to pay all collection
costs, expenses, agents' fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees.

The undersigned further states if he should default on said loan, the lender
shall be authorized to place a lien on the following collateral:

                     1. All properties of Color Image, Inc


Borrowers Signature:                            Address:


/s/ Sueling Wang                                4350 Peachtree Ind. Blvd. #100
-------------------------------------------
Sueling Wang, President Color Image, Inc.       Norcross, GA 30071

/s/ Ann Shieh
-------------------------------------------
Witness
#### W. W. BRANSON v. W. C. YORK and MRS. W. C. YORK

No. 7119SC194

(Filed 23 June 1971)

Trial § 51— jury verdict set aside

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in this action on contract.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Gambill, Judge,*21 September 1970 Session of Superior Court held in Randolph County.

Civil action on contract. Plaintiff seeks to recover $1,440.50 alleged to be the balance owed him by defendants for services rendered and materials furnished. Defendants denied the debt and counterclaimed for $2,170.47 which they allege to be the reasonable value of various services and property which they allege were furnished to plaintiff. The jury returned verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $800.00. Defendants moved that the court in its discretion set the verdict aside as being contrary to the greater weight of the evidence. From order allowing this motion and directing that the case be restored to the trial docket, plaintiff appealed.

*Ottway Burton for plaintiff appellant.*

*Bell, Ogburn & Redding by John N. Ogburn, Jr., and William W. Ivey for defendant appellees.*

PARKER, Judge.

The action of the trial judge in setting aside a verdict in his discretion is not subject to review on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. *Goldston v. Chambers,*272 N.C. 53, 157 S.E. 2d 676; *City of Randleman v. Hudson,*2 N.C. App. 404, 163 S.E. 2d 77. The record in this case does not disclose an abuse of discretion by the trial judge; hence, the order setting aside the verdict in this case is not subject to review on appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Vaughn concur.