alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20632]



[[Page 60129]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 135; Environmental Conditions and Test 
Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and 
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 2-3, 2005 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 
805, Colson Board Room, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 135 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> March 2-3:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome and Introductory 
Remarks).
    <bullet> Approval of Summary from the Forty-Fifth Meeting.
    <bullet> RTCA Paper No. 099-05/SC135-650.
    <bullet> Review Results of EUROCAE ED-14 Meeting.
    <bullet> Discuss Options and Directions of DO-160 User Guide.
    <bullet> Review Status of Working Group 16.
    <bullet> Review Status of Working Group 21.
    <bullet> Review Change Proposals for all other Sections.
    <bullet> Review Schedule to Release DO-160F.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (New/Unfinished Business, Date and 
Place of Next Meeting).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on October 5, 2005.
Natalie Ogletree,
FAA General Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 05-20632 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000025

12-JUN-2018

09:46 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FRANCIS G. LANDMESSER,

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF LUZERNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 569 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4670 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4670

 To establish a program through which each State may provide a bust to 
           be displayed in one of the House Office Buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a program through which each State may provide a bust to 
           be displayed in one of the House Office Buildings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE BUSTS PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Established.--There is established a program under 
which the Architect of the Capitol shall solicit, accept, and place 
busts from each of the States for display in one of the Cannon, 
Rayburn, or Longworth House Office Buildings in accordance with this 
Act.
    (b) Acceptance of Busts.--Any bust accepted for display under this 
program shall be considered a gift to the United States.
    (c) Limitation on Number of State Busts.--No State may have more 
than one bust on display under this Act.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Committee on House Administration of the House 
of Representatives shall promulgate regulations to carry out the 
program established in section 1.
    (b) Eligibility of Busts.--In promulgating regulations under 
subsection (a), the Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives shall specify standards which must be met by busts 
provided by the States under section 1 in order for such busts to be 
considered for acceptance and placement by the Architect of the 
Capitol. Such standards shall specify at least the following:
            (1) Each bust must portray a leading political, religious, 
        or cultural figure from the history of the State.
            (2) Each bust must conform to roughly uniform dimensions.
            (3) Construction of each bust must be in either bronze or 
        marble.
            (4) The style of each bust must be realistic.
            (5) No bust representing any individual may be accepted for 
        display as part of the program until after the expiration of 
        the 50-year period which begins on the date of the individual's 
        death.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BILLY SANFORD McCOY

No. 7515SC66

(Filed 7 May 1975)

Criminal Law § 155.5 — failure to docket appeal in apt time

Appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the appeal within 90 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, no valid order extending the time to docket having been entered during the 90-day period. Court of Appeals Rule 5.

Appeal by defendant from *Brewer, Judge.*Judgment entered 27 August 1974 in Superior Court, Chatham County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 April 1975.

Defendant was charged in a warrant with operating a motor vehicle on a public street or highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense, and with operating a motor vehicle on a public street or highway while his operator’s license was revoked. He was convicted in district court and appealed to superior court.

The jury found him guilty of both offenses charged. From judgment imposing a suspended sentence, defendant appealed to this Court.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General William B. Ray, for the State.*

*Gunn & Messick, by Paul S. Messick, Jr., and Robert L. Gunn, for defendant appellant.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

The judgment appealed from was entered on 27 August 1974, but the record on appeal was not docketed until 20 January 1975, more than 90 days later. No valid order extending time to docket was entered during the 90-day period. For failure to comply with Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals, this appeal is

Dismissed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Parker concur.
#### Roland DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 82170.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Three.

July 22, 2003.

Roland Davis, Licking, pro se.

Patricia A. Hageman, Edward J. Han-lon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roland Davis appeals from the judgment dismissing his negligence action. He asserts that the statute of limitations should not apply. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT
      32**





CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Thomas T. Fleming, Chief Executive
      Officer of Corecare Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), and John Gill, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of
      his
      knowledge:




1.
      The
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005,
      and
      to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Annual Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at
      the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations
      of
      the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.








DATE:
      January 29, 2007






By:
      /s/
      Thomas T. Fleming


-----------------------------------


Thomas
      T.
      Fleming, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)








DATE:
      January 29, 2007





By:
      /s/
      John T. Gill


--------------------------


John
      T.
      Gill, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




I,
      Peter
      Dugan, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




·   the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended
      July 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




·   the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   
      November 16, 2007.


/s/
                Peter DuganPeter
                DuganChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)




I,
      Peter
      Gallic, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




·   the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended
      July 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




·   the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   
      November 16, 2007.


/s/
                Peter GallicPeter
                GallicChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)
#### JAIME ROMAN ROBLES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7453

March 12, 1975

532 P.2d 1033

*142
      *Gary A. Sheerin,*State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Robert C. Manley,*District Attorney, and *Richard G. Barrows,*Deputy, Elko County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Jaime Roman Robles pleaded guilty to the charge of second degree murder and was sentenced to a term of fifteen years in the Nevada State Prison.

This appeal is taken from an order denying appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Appellant contends that his plea of guilty was not intelligently made and therefore defective. He also argues that defense counsel was so ineffective as to deny him his right to counsel. Neither contention has merit.

Appellant is a Puerto Rican immigrant and apparently has difficulty speaking and understanding the English language. He attributes his inability to understand either the nature or the *143consequences of his guilty plea to this language barrier, and thus contends the plea was not intelligently made. However, the record shows that both counsel and the court were careful to provide verbatim translation from English to Spanish during every stage of the proceedings, including the hearing at entry of plea. Defense counsel, who spoke some Spanish, was present along with a qualified interpreter. The proceedings at the time of the entry of plea met the requirements of Armstrong v. Warden, 90 Nev. 8, 518 P.2d 147 (1974).

Appellant’s second contention, that he was denied effective representation by counsel, finds no support in the record. No showing has been made to overcome the presumption that his attorney fully discharged his duties. Smithart v. State, 86 Nev. 925, 478 P.2d 576 (1970).

The conviction is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.41

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

AMOUNT: $200,000.00                                          DATE: APRIL 10 2000

Twenty days after date of receipt, for value received, the undersigned (jointly
and severally if more than one) promise(s) to pay to the order of:

                                 AccuRec LLC.

The sum of two hundred thousand dollars plus an interest equal to (8% annually)
               ------------------------
payable at any place the holder may so designate. Interest to be paid at loan
pay offtime.

The undersigned and any endorser or guarantors herefore, jointly and severally,
hereby agree that upon default in payment of performance of this note, or the
death, or any act of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of any of them,
however expressed or indicated, then this note shall, at the option of the
holder, become immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest
or further attorney and/or agent of the holder, and the undersigned, and any
endorser or guarantors, jointly and severally, agree to pay all collection
costs, expenses, agents' fees, and reasonable attorney's fees.

The undersigned further states if he should default on said loan, the lender
shall be authorized to place a lien on the following collateral:

          1. All properties of Color Image, Inc

Borrowers Signature:                              Address:

/s/ Sueling Wang
---------------------------------------------     4350 Peachtree Ind. Blvd. #100
Sueling Wang, President Color Image, Inc.         Norcross, GA 30071

/s/ Ann Shieh, /s/ Larry Lyu
---------------------------------------------
Witness
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of China Mineral  Acquisition
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Simon Mu, Chief
Executive  Officer  and  Chairman  of the  Board  of China  Mineral  Acquisition
Corporation,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of China
Mineral Acquisition Corporation. as of and for the period covered by the Report.

         Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated:  May 16, 2006                    /s/ Simon Mu
                                        -----------------------
                                        Simon Mu
                                        Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5272 

To increase the maximum civil penalty for violations of Federal motor vehicle 

safety standards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To increase the maximum civil penalty for violations of 

Federal motor vehicle safety standards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM CIVIL PENALTIES. 

4 Section 30165(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ both places it appears 

7 and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

8 (2) by striking the last sentence of paragraphs 

9 (1) and (3), respectively. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5271 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5271

 To amend section 1877 of the Social Security Act to delay by 2 years 
   the expansion cut-off date imposed by the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2010

 Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself and Mr. Gene Green of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 1877 of the Social Security Act to delay by 2 years 
   the expansion cut-off date imposed by the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR DELAY IN PPACA CUT-OFF DATE ON EXPANSION OF 
              PHYSICIAN-OWNED HOSPITALS.

    Section 1877(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395nn(i)), 
as added by section 6001(a)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (Public Law 111-148) and as amended by section 10601(a) of 
such Act and section 1106 of the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), is amended in 
paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (3)(C)(iii), by striking ``December 31, 2010'' 
and inserting ``December 31, 2012'' each place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
----

Berichtigung der Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 753/2002 der Kommission vom 29. April 2002 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1493/1999 des Rates hinsichtlich der Beschreibung, der Bezeichnung, der Aufmachung und des Schutzes bestimmter Weinbauerzeugnisse

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 272 vom 23. Oktober 2003)

Auf Seite 38, in der Berichtigung für die Seite 24 des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 118 vom 4. Mai 2002:

anstatt:

„anstatt:

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„anstatt:

muss es heißen:

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Vestin Group,
Inc., (the "Registrant"), and John W. Alderfer, as Chief Financial Officer of
Vestin Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that

      (1)   the Registrant's Transition Report on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year
            ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with
            the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


Dated: June 2, 2003                    /s/ Michael V. Shustek
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael V. Shustek
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: June 2, 2003                    /s/ John W. Alderfer
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John W. Alderfer
                                       Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Robert R. Foley, Chief Financial Officer of Gramercy,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Gramercy.

 
| /s/ Robert R. Foley |   |
|---------------------|--------|
| Name:               |   | Robert  R. Foley |
| Title:              |   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |        |  |  |

 

Date: November 9, 2005

 

----