alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Telephone Bank


Sunshine Act; Meetings

AGENCY: Rural Telephone Bank, USDA.

ACTION: Staff Briefing for the Board of Directors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Date:  2 p.m., Wednesday, November 2, 2005.

Place: Conference Room 104-A, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 12th & Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC.

Status:  Open.

Matters To Be Discussed: The following matters have been placed on the 
Staff briefing for the Board of Directors meeting agenda:
    1. Reduction in FY2005 class C stock dividend rate due to statutory 
restrictions.
    2. Update on liquidation of the bank.
    3. Administrative and other issues.

ACTION: Stockholders' meeting.

Time and Date:  9 a.m., Thursday, November 3, 2005.

Place: Conference Room 107-A, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 12th & Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC.

Status:  Open.

Matters to be Considered: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the stockholders' meeting:
    1. Call to order.
    2. Establishment of a quorum.
    3. Action on Minutes of the November 14, 2003, stockholders' 
meeting.
    4. Secretary's Report on loans approved, FY 2005.
    5. Treasurer's Report.
    6. Status report on liquidation of the Bank.
    7. New business.
    8. Adjournment.

ACTION: Board of Directors meeting.

Time and Date: Immediately following stockholders' meeting, Thursday, 
November 3, 2005.

Place: Conference Room 107-A, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 12th & Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the Board of Directors meeting (Items 3 through 5 will only 
be necessary if a quorum is not established in the stockholders' 
meeting and these items are not addressed previously.):
    1. Call to order.
    2. Action on Minutes of the August 4, 2005, board meeting.
    3. Secretary's Report on loans approved, FY 2005.
    4. Treasurer's Report.
    5. Status report on liquidation of the Bank.
    6. Consideration of resolution to reduce FY2005 class C stock 
dividend rate due to statutory restrictions.
    7. Establishment of meeting dates for 2006.
    8. Adjournment.

Contact Person for More Information: Jonathan Claffey, Acting Assistant 
Governor, Rural Telephone Bank, (202) 720-9554.

    Dated: October 21, 2005.
Curtis Anderson,
Acting Governor, Rural Telephone Bank.
[FR Doc. 05-21383 Filed 10-21-05; 2:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           13,986,507
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,196,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17,330,435
<PP&E>                                           65,370,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41,628,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   50,121,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5,362,337
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       23,412,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     50,121,878
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,836,472
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4,103,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     70,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  425,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,237,424
<EPS-BASIC>                                            2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

**and ChiefFinancial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to**

### **Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mrs. Fields FamousBrands, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the 13 weeks ended October 1,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Stephen Russo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andMark C. McBride, as Interim Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen Russo                |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen Russo                    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer          |   |
| November 11, 2005           |   |
|                             |   |
| /s/ Mark C. McBride              |   |
| Mark C. McBride                  |
| Interim Chief Accounting Officer |
| November 11, 2005           |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC and will be retained by Mrs. FieldsFamous Brands, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRANDON ALEXANDER MOLINET,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3810

[February 4, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

19001050CT10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2008 |  | /s/ TRACY W. KROHN                                                         
|                     |  | Tracy W. Krohn                                                             
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                                      
|                     | 
|Date: August 6, 2008 |  | /s/ JOHN D. GIBBONS                                                        
|                     |  | John D. Gibbons                                                            
|                     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
NUMBER 13-14-00384-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JASON CHAVEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's sixth motion for extension 

of time to file the brief. The reporter’s record was filed on September 16, 2014, and 

appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). This Court has previously granted appellant extensions totaling 165 days to file 
2

the brief, and appellant now seeks an additional 21 days, until May 4, 2015, to file the 

brief. 

The Court GRANTS appellant’s sixth unopposed motion for extension to file the 

brief and ORDERS the Honorable Ira Z. Miller to file the brief on or before May 4, 2015. 

The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief 

in this matter. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. If 

counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act 

appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

22nd day of April, 2015.
#### SERGE VAILLANCOURT, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent.

No. 7510

December 20, 1974

529 P.2d 204

*Horace R. Goff,*State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Roy A. Woof-ter,*District Attorney, and *Sherman H. Simmons,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

*432OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant Serge Vaiílancourt was indicted for the unlawful sale of narcotics. He entered a not guilty plea, and the case was set down for trial. On the day of trial, Vaiílancourt changed his plea to guilty, and he was sentenced to serve 8 years in the Nevada State Prison. He seeks post-conviction relief, claiming that his guilty plea was entered in response to promises from the district attorney’s office that the district attorney would recommend probation. This was not done.

Vaiílancourt has filed in support of his petition affidavits from both of his parents, a California attorney who had been his counsel in other matters and who had spoken in Vaillan-court’s behalf when he was sentenced, and a woman friend. All four affidavits corroborate Vaillancourt’s claim that he had been promised a recommendation for probation.

The judge below, in considering Vaillancourt’s petition, summarily denied it without affording him an evidentiary hearing.1 Our recent case of Fine v. Warden, 90 Nev. 166, 521 P.2d 374 (1974), is controlling in the instant appeal. There, we held that where an accused enters a guilty plea upon the basis of a promise made by the State, and the promise is unequivocal, then he is entitled to withdraw his plea if the promise is unfulfilled. Where, as here, something more than a naked allegation has been asserted, it is error to resolve the apparent factual dispute without granting the accused an evidentiary hearing.2 Accordingly, Vaiílancourt is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing for the determination of the truth or falsity of the allegation of a promise. If the allegation is true, then he is entitled to plead anew. Macon v. Craven, *supra*note 2.

*433We therefore reverse the order below and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of Vaillancourt’s allegation as to a promise.

1

Apparently the judge received the transcript of the sentencing hearing, which complied with the mandates of Higby v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 774, 476 P.2d 959*(1970), then in*effect, and concluded *that*Vaillan-court’s petition was meritless.

2

It should be noted that a bare allegation, without more, will not in all cases require an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Moody v. United States, 497 F.2d 359 (7th Cir. 1974); Roberts v. United States, 486 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1973); Macon v. Craven, 457 F.2d 342 (9th Cir. 1972); Legg v. United States, 350 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1965); United States v. Lester, 328 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1964).
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ EVOLUSION CONCEPTS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
HOC EVENTS, INC., DBA SUPERTOOL USA, Defendant

-------------------------------------------- EVOLUSION CONCEPTS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
JUGGERNAUT TACTICAL, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1963, 2021

- 1987

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No s . 2:19

- cv

- 02736

- JLS

DFM, 8:18

- cv

- 01378

- JLS

- DFM, Judge Josephine L. Staton.

______________________ ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

______________________ Case: 21-1963 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 03/18/2022EVOLUSION CONCEPTS , INC

. v. HOC EVENTS , INC

. 2

Before M OORE , Chief Judge
, N EWMAN , L OURIE , D YK , P ROST , R EYNA , T ARANTO , C HEN , H UGHES , S TOLL , and C UNNINGHAM , Circuit Judges

. 1
P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R Juggernaut Tactical, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafterthe petition for rehearing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who are in reg ular active service. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The panel makes one change in its opinion, which is unrelated to the rehearing petition. Foo tnote 1 is replaced with the following: On October 26, 2021, the district court issued an order granting attorney’s fees to Juggernaut as a “prevailing party” under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and directing Juggernaut to submit a proposed amendment to the earlier judg ment to incorporate the fees award

— thus making clear that the October 26th order was not going to “be the court’s final act in the matter.” S.L. ex rel. Loof v. Upland Unified School Dist. , 747 F.3d 1155, 1161

– 62 (9th Cir. 2014) (cleaned up). On November 24, 2021, after Juggernaut made the submission, the court issued an amended final judgment incorporating the

1 Circuit Judge O’Malley retired on March 11, 2022. Case: 21-1963 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 03/18/2022EVOLUSION CONCEPTS , INC

. v. HOC EVENTS , INC

. 3

award of attorney’s fees. On December 1 , 2021, within 30 days of the November 24th judgment, Evolusion timely filed an amended notice of appeal t o include, in Appeal No. 21

- 1987, the district court’s final judgment granting attorney’s fees toJuggernaut. Juggernaut has not objected to inclusion of that judgment in Appeal No. 21

- 1987. This change does not alter the court’s judgment, and no new judg ment will be issued.

The mandate of the court will issue on March 25, 2022.

March 18 , 2022 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1963 Document: 48 Page: 3 Filed: 03/18/2022
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the quarterly report of Furniture Brands  International,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, David P. Howard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company. of the Company.



                                      /s/ David P. Howard
                                   -------------------------------------
                                      David P. Howard
                                      Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                      Furniture Brands International, Inc.
                                      August 11, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the financial statements contained in the body of the
accompanying Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          106592
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    47106
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1630
<INVENTORY>                                      32261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                204916
<PP&E>                                          346744
<DEPRECIATION>                                  119798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  523428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           145736
<BONDS>                                         223149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         17
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                       53225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    523428
<SALES>                                         239804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                239804
<CGS>                                           182477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   265937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (463)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (79518)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 653291
<INCOME-TAX>                                     19303 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6469 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (2290)
<NET-INCOME>                                      4179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        


</TABLE>
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31994D0383

**94/383/EC: Commission Decision of 3 June 1994 on the criteria to be applied to establishments manufacturing meat products without having an industrial structure or an industrial production capacity (Text with EEA relevance)***Official Journal L 174 , 08/07/1994 P. 0033 - 0033 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 59 P. 0009  Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 59 P. 0009*

COMMISSION DECISION of 3 June 1994 on the criteria to be applied to establishments manufacturing meat products without having an industrial structure or an industrial production capacity (Text with EEA relevance) (94/383/EC)

THE  COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 

 Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, 

 Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting the production and marketing of meat products and certain other products of animal origin (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular  

Article 9 

(5) thereof, 

 Whereas it is necessary to lay down criteria for the classification of establishments in order to ensure a uniform implementation of Directive 77/99/EEC; 

 Whereas Member States have communicated to the Commission the criteria which they have adopted to assess whether an establishment or a category of establishments has no industrial structure or production capacity; 

 Whereas the derogations referred to in Article 9 (1) and (2) of Directive 77/99/EEC concern only the structure of the estabishments and not the hygienic requirements laid down in the said Directive; 

 Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, 

 HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 

Article 1 

 1. For the purpose of granting the derogations referred to in Article 9 (1) and (2) of Directive 77/99/EEC, Member States shall fix a maximum production limit for each establishment. 

 When fixing that limit, they shall take particular account of the following parameters: the establishment's structure and layout, the flow of the products, and the storage capacity for raw materials and end products. 

 2. The granting of the derogations referred to in paragraph 1 is subject to observance by each establishment of the production limit laid down in pursuance of paragraph 1. 

 3. In no case shall the production limit laid down in paragraph 1 exceed a quantity of 7,5 tonnes of finished product per week, or one tonne per week in the case of foie gras production. 

Article 2 

 This Decision is addressed to the Member States. 

 Done at Brussels, 3 June 1994. 

 For the Commission

 René STEICHEN

 Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85. Updated by Directive 92/5/EEC (OJ No L 57, 2. 3. 1992, p. 1). 

 (2) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49).
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.

    We consent to the use of our report dated February 28, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet of Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholder's equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented separately herein), in this Form 20-F/A (amendment No. 2) of
DaimlerChrysler AG. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-13160) of DaimlerChrysler North
America Holding Corporation and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-5074, 333-7082, 333-8998, 333-86934 and 333-86936) of DaimlerChrysler AG of
our report referred to above.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

September 25, 2002
Long Beach, California