alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62303-62304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Membership of the Office of the Secretary of Defense; Performance 
Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, the Joint staff, the U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization, the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency, the Defense 
Commissary Agency, the Defense Security Service, the Defense Security 
Assistance Agency, the Missile Defense Agency, the Defense Field 
Activities and the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces. The 
publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).
    The Performance Review Board (PRB) provides fair and impartial 
review of Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes 
recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to 
the Secretary of Defense.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 31, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Burrell, Executive and 
Political Personnel Division, Directorate for Personnel and Security, 
Washington Headquarters Services, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 
Department of Defense, The Pentagon, (703) 693-8347.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following executives are appointed to the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense PRB: Specific PRB panel assignments will be made from this 
group. Executives listed will serve a one-year renewable term, 
effective October 31, 2005.

Office of the Secretary of Defense

Chairperson

Nancy Spruill
    Robert Nemetz
    Gail McGinn
    Mary George
    Cheryl Roby
    Joyce France
    David Pauling
    William Lowry
    Paul Hanley
    April Stephenson
    Paul Koffsky
    Claretta Merkey
    John Landon
    Frank Anderson
    Janet Felts
    Jeanne Farmer
    Eric Coulter
    Jeanne Fites
    LeAntha Sumpter
    Ellen Embrey
    Bill Lehr
    Timothy Morgan
    Jennifer Buck
    Ann Reese
    Keith Webster
    Jim Russell
    Bob Skalamara
    Ken Handelman
    Caryn Hollis
    Alan Liotta
    Robert Newberry
    Tom Lavery
    Marilee Fitzgerald
    Joseph Angello
    Mike Kern
    Scott Comes
    Jim Bexfield
    Anne O'Connor
    Kenneth Catlow

[[Page 62304]]

    Scott Comes
    Beth McCormick

    Dated: October 25, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-21609 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
# L_2007203EN.01009201.xml

| 3.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/92

---

Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 77 of 16 March 2007
  )

On page I/169, the table ‘Section VIII — Ombudsman’ is replaced by the following table:

Section VIII — European Ombudsman

| Category and grade | 2006 | 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Permanent posts | | Temporary posts | Permanent posts | | Temporary posts |
| AD 16 | — | | — | — | | — |
| AD 15 | — | | 1 | — | | 1 |
| AD 14 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 |
| AD 13 | — | | — | 1 | | — |
| AD 12 | 2 | | 3 | 1 | | 4 |
| AD 11 | — | | 3 | — | | 2 |
| AD 10 | — | | 1 | — | | 1 |
| AD 9 | — | | 2 | — | | 5 |
| AD 8 | — | | 3 | — | | — |
| AD 7 | — | | 2 | — | | 2 |
| AD 6 | — | | 7 | — | | 7 |
| AD 5 | — | | 3 | — | | 3 |
| Total | 3 | | 26 | 3 | | 26 |
| AST 11 | — | | — | — | | — |
| AST 10 | — | | — | — | | — |
| AST 9 | — | | — | — | | — |
| AST 8 | — | | — | — | | — |
| AST 7 | 2 | | — | 2 | | — |
| AST 6 | — | | 4 | — | | 6 |
| AST 5 | 2 | | 2 | 2 | | — |
| AST 4 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 |
| AST 3 | 5 | | 3 | 6 | | 5 |
| AST 2 | 1 | | 2 | — | | — |
| AST 1 | 1 | | 4 | 1 | | 4 |
| Total | 12 | | 16 | 12 | | 16 |
| Grand total | 15 | | 42 | 15 | | 42 |

Category and grade

2006

2007

Permanent posts

Temporary posts

Permanent posts

Temporary posts

AD 16

—

—

—

—

AD 15

—

1

—

1

AD 14

1

1

1

1

AD 13

—

—

1

—

AD 12

2

3

1

4

AD 11

—

3

—

2

AD 10

—

1

—

1

AD 9

—

2

—

5

AD 8

—

3

—

—

AD 7

—

2

—

2

AD 6

—

7

—

7

AD 5

—

3

—

3

Total

3

26

3

26

AST 11

—

—

—

—

AST 10

—

—

—

—

AST 9

—

—

—

—

AST 8

—

—

—

—

AST 7

2

—

2

—

AST 6

—

4

—

6

AST 5

2

2

2

—

AST 4

1

1

1

1

AST 3

5

3

6

5

AST 2

1

2

—

—

AST 1

1

4

1

4

Total

12

16

12

16

Grand total

Grand total

15

15

42

42

15

15

42

42

---
#### Jacob Goldstein, Appellant-Respondent, *v.*Stadler’s Shoes, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 4, 1936.

*805
      *Englander & Englander [Alfred 0. Englander*of counsel], for the appellant-respondent.

*Henry M. Flateau,*for the respondent-appellant.

Per Curiam.

Rent for the quarter commencing June 1, 1929, became due in advance on that date. There being no evidence that defendant surrendered possession, or was evicted or otherwise damaged, during the quarter, the fact that title to the premises vested by condemnation in the city of New York August ninth following did not entitle defendant to recover on its counterclaim on the theory of apportionment for the period from that date to the end of the quarter. *(Giles*v. Comstock, 4 N. Y. 270; *Gugel*v. *Isaacs,*21 App. Div. 503; affd. on opinion below, 162 N. Y. 636.)

Judgment modified by increasing plaintiff’s recovery to the sum of $906.75, with costs, and as modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

All concur. Present — Levy, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 985/2004

of 14 May 2004         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24 per tonne, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 30 April 2004 to 13 May 2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 29,10 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 44,30 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*4)  Fob Duluth.

----
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/      Curtis L. Garner, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Curtis      L. Garner, Jr.     |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer   |   |
| March      8, 2010             |   |
ex10-40loanaddendum



ADDENDUM-TERMINATING EVENTS


	
Borrower:
	
NXT Aero USA Inc. 
	
Lender:
	
Aviation Finance Group, LLC

	
 
	
3557 S. Valley View Boulevard 
	
 
	
4355 Emerald St.

	
 
	
Las Vegas, NV 89103
	
 
	
Suite 200

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Boise, ID 83706

	
Guarantor:
	
Energy Exploration Technologies
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
840 7th Avenue S.W., Suite 700
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Calgary, ALB T2P3G2
	
 
	
 




This Addendum - TERMINATING Events is attached to and by this reference is made a part of the Commercial Guaranty, dated November 6, 2000, and executed in connection with this loan or other financial accommodations between AVIATION FINANCE GROUP, LLC ("Lender") and NXT Aero USA Inc. ("Borrower").

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Commercial Guaranty to the contrary, Lender shall, without notice of any nature whatsoever, enforce the full and prompt payment and performance of the
Guarantor's obligations under this Commercial Guaranty until one of the following events shall have occurred (the "Terminating Events"):


	The ratio of (x) the unpaid principal balance of the loan to (y) the estimated retail value of the collateral, as determined by the lender in its discretion, is less than 50%.




THIS ADDENDUM - TERMINATING EVENTS IS EXECUTED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2000.

GUARANTOR:

ENERGY EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES

By: ___/s/ Daniel C. Topolinsky_________________________                         
By: __/s/_John M. Woodbury, Jr._____________________

Daniel C. Topolinsky, President of Energy Exploration Technologies               
John M. Woodbury, Jr., Secretary of Energy Exploration Technologies

 

LENDER:

AVIATION FINANCE GROUP, LLC

 

By: ____________________________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13A-14(1) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Petrosearch Energy Corporation, (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Dole, Chief Executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The  report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  company.


Date: August 14, 2006


By:   /s/ Richard Dole
      ----------------
      Richard Dole
      Chief Executive Officer
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**RULE      13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |  /s/                David Collins                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David                Collins                                           |   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Jack Abramov, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc..;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 16, 2007 /S/ Jack AbramovName: Jack AbramovTitle: Chief Executive Officer
# Leif Erikson Day, 2005

More than 1,000 years ago, Leif Erikson left the coast of Greenland and began a journey to explore new lands. He made that voyage in the spirit of discovery and became one of the first Europeans known to have reached North America, inspiring stories of bountiful lands and charting a way for future explorers to follow. On Leif Erikson Day, we celebrate the accomplishments of Leif Erikson and his crew, and we honor the many contributions of Nordic Americans to our Nation.

The journey of Leif Erikson reflects the spirit that has made America strong, as the desire to explore and understand is part of our national character. Today, we continue to push the frontiers of knowledge in many areas and especially with our exploration of space, drawn to the heavens as we were once drawn to the open seas.

Generations of Nordic Americans have come to our country with a sense of determination and optimism, and they have helped build a stronger and more vibrant Nation. On Leif Erikson Day, we celebrate Nordic Americans, as well as the ties between America and the Nordic nations. We are joined by a common respect for liberty, human rights, and the dignity of every person. Working together, we are spreading freedom and hope, and we are helping to build a better and more compassionate world.

To honor Leif Erikson, son of Iceland and grandson of Norway, and to celebrate our citizens of Nordic-American heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88-566) approved on September 2, 1964, has authorized and requested the President to proclaim October 9 of each year as “Leif Erikson Day.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2005, as Leif Erikson Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-20657

Billing code 3195-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Michael P. ODonnell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Xerium Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the
Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael P. ODonnell                            
|Michael P. ODonnell                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
#### HOWARD A. VAN AUKEN v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 44646.

Decided November 2, 1942]

*Messrs. King <& King*for the plaintiff. *Mr. Fred W. Shields*was on the brief.

*Mr. Louis R.*Mehlinger, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M.*Shea, for the defendant. *Miss Stella Ai/cen*was on the brief.

*370The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion *per*curiam, as follows:

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The proof is, and the Court has made an ultimate finding, that during the period of plaintiff’s claim his mother was in fact dependent upon him for her chief support. The increase in rental and subsistence allowances due plaintiff on account of this dependent condition is $1,077.06, and judgment in this amount will be rendered in favor of the plaintiff accordingly. No cases are cited in the briefs. In view of the many dependent mother cases heretofore decided it would seem unnecessary to recite or review them in this memorandum.