alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5266 

AN ACT 

To extend the final report deadline and otherwise reauthorize 

the National Commission on Children and Disasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5266 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Commission 

3 on Children and Disasters Reauthorization Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON CHILDREN AND DISAS5 TERS REAUTHORIZATION. 

6 (a) DEADLINE FOR FILLING VACANCIES.—Para7 graph (2) of section 605(g) of the Kids in Disasters Well8 being, Safety, and Health Act of 2007 (title VI of division 

9 G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public 

10 Law 110–161; 121 Stat. 1844, 2213)) is amended by in11 serting ‘‘not later than 90 days after the date of vacancy’’ 

12 after ‘‘shall be filled’’. 

13 (b) FREQUENCY OF INTERIM REPORTS.—Subsection 

14 (a) of section 611 of the Kids in Disasters Well-being, 

15 Safety, and Health Act of 2007 is amended— 

16 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘IN17 TERIM REPORT’’ and inserting ‘‘INTERIM RE18 PORTS’’; and 

19 (2) by inserting ‘‘and annually thereafter’’ after 

20 ‘‘first meeting’’. 

21 (c) DEADLINE FOR FINAL REPORT.—Subsection (c) 

22 of section 611 of the Kids in Disasters Well-being, Safety, 

23 and Health Act of 2007 is amended by striking ‘‘not later 

24 than 2 years after the date of its first meeting’’ and insert25 ing ‘‘not later than December 31, 2012’’. 
3 

•HR 5266 EH

1 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 612 of such Act is amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 612. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro5 priated to carry out this title $1,500,000 for each of fiscal 

6 years 2008 through 2012, and $1,000,000 for fiscal year 

7 2013. 

8 ‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts made available pursu9 ant to subsection (a) shall remain available until ex10 pended.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5266 

AN ACT 

To extend the final report deadline and otherwise 

and Disasters. reauthorize the National Commission on Children
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 25, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, N. Michael Dion, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                                     
|----- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | August 8, 2006                                                      
|      | 
|      |  | /s/ N. MICHAEL DION                                                 
|      |  | N. Michael Dion Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LESLEY SPENCER

No. 742SC134

(Filed 1 May 1974)

Homicide §§ 10, 28— defense of family member — failure to instruct

Trial judge in a murder ease committed prejudicial error in failing to instruct the jury on the right to use force in defense of one’s family.

Appeal by defendant from *Fountain, Judge,*20 August 1978 Session of Superior Court held in Beaufort County.

Defendant was indicted and tried for the murder of Harvey Ward. The jury found him guilty of manslaughter, and he was sentenced to a prison term of 12 to 15 years. He appealed tó this Court.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Associate Attorney E. Thomas Maddox, Jr., for the State.*

*McMullan, Knott & Carter, by W. B. Carter, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

BALEY, Judge.

The State contends that Harvey Ward was shot and killed by defendant’s brother, Respess Spencer, and that defendant aided and abetted in the killing. Defendant could not be convicted as an aider and abettor, however, unless the jury first found that Respess Spencer was guilty of murder or manslaughter. Defendant contends (and his evidence tends to show) that Respess Spencer could not be guilty, because when he shot Harvey Ward he did so to protect defendant, who was being attacked by Ward.

*446North Carolina law recognizes that “a person may not only take life in his own defense, but he may also do so in defense of another who stands in a family relation to him.” *State v. Carter,*254 N.C. 475, 478, 119 S.E. 2d 461, 464; *accord, State v. Todd,*264 N.C. 524, 142 S.E. 2d 154; *State v. Holloway,*7 N.C. App. 147, 171 S.E. 2d 475. But the trial judge did not instruct the jury on this issue. He charged extensively on the right of self-defense, but he made no mention of the right to use force in defense of one’s family. The failure to instruct the jury on this fundamental issue of the case constitutes prejudicial error. *State v. Anderson,*222 N.C. 148, 22 S.E. 2d 271; *State v. Dills,*196 N.C. 457, 146 S.E. 1; *State v. Spencer,*18 N.C. App. 499, 197 S.E. 2d 232; *State v. Spencer,*18 N.C. App. 323, 196 S.E. 2d 573.

Because of this error in the court’s charge, defendant is entitled to a new trial.

New trial.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Parker concur.
#### MARVIN JAMES ROSENEAU, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7422

April 19, 1974

521 P.2d 369

*James W. Johnson, Jr.,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*162
      *Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Robert E. Rose,*District Attorney, and *Kathleen M. Wall,*Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

On September 25, 1968 appellant was charged by information with having committed a crime against nature on a person under the age of 18 years, the penalty for which is life with the possibility of parole after five years. Appellant plead not guilty to this charge. On February 28, 1969 the district court permitted the prosecution to file an amended information charging a crime against nature, the penalty for which is not less than one nor more than six years. Petitioner entered a plea of nolo contendere to this charge.

On May 12, 1969 the court granted appellant permission to change his nolo plea to that of not guilty. At the same time the State moved that the amended information be withdrawn and that the case proceed on the information originally filed on September 25, 1968. The court denied this motion, but granted the State “leave to file another Amended Information setting forth the facts contained in the original Information.” A second amended information charging the original offense was filed and the case proceeded to jury trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the appellant was subsequently sentenced to the appropriate penalty for the crime charged. There was a direct appeal from this conviction which was affirmed in Roseneau v. State, 87 Nev. 463, 488 P.2d 917 (1971). The issue raised in the lower court was not presented in that appeal.

Appellant urges that the State violated the provisions of NRS 173.0951 when it filed the second amended information upon which he was tried, and that he should have been sentenced to the penalty of one to six years provided for the crime charged in the first amended information.

Appellant failed to challenge the information as amended in a pretrial motion. NRS 174.105. Failure to present any defense *163or objection as provided in this section constitutes a waiver thereof unless the court is moved to grant relief for good cause shown. NRS 174.105(2). Appellant offers no reason for his failure to present this motion before trial.

Furthermore, appellant failed to raise this issue in a prior appeal to this court. In Craig v. Warden, 87 Nev. 39, 482 P.2d 325 (1971), this court affirmed the denial of the defendant’s application for post-conviction relief on the ground that the asserted error was not presented in his earlier appeal and no reason was given to explain the omission. See also Sanchez v. Warden, 89 Nev. 273, 510 P.2d 1362 (1973); NRS 177.375.

Because appellant failed to follow appropriate procedures, we decline to address the issue raised.

Affirmed.

The court may permit an information to be amended at any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.
EXHIBIT 23.3


To the Board of Directors
Bull Run Corporation:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Nos.  33-91296 and 33-91298) on Form S-8 of Bull Run  Corporation of our report
dated  February  10, 1997 with respect to the balance  sheets of Capital  Sports
Properties,  Inc. as of June 30, 1996 and  December  31,  1995,  and the related
statements of earnings,  changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
six-months  ended June 30,  1996 and the year ended  December  31,  1995,  which
report  appears in the December 31, 1997 annual  report on Form 10-K of Bull Run
Corporation.



                                             /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 25, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6921

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES FRANKLIN BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-46, CA-98-412-5-BR) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Franklin Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Scott L. Wilkinson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Butler , Nos. CR-96-46; CA-98-412-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5326 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5326

    To repeal the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2010

 Mr. Conaway introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL ORGANIC CERTIFICATION COST-SHARE PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal of Authority for Program.--Section 10606 of the Farm 
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 6523) is repealed.
    (b) Termination of Obligations for Program.--On and after the date 
of enactment of this Act, no funds shall be obligated to carry out the 
national organic certification cost-share program established under 
section 10606(a) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 
(7 U.S.C. 6523).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PREMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE 12 MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,415,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,415,248
<PP&E>                                      10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,085,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,305,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,415,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,889,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,305,223
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,826,991
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               355,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,471,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,471,842
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,471,842
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6946

JOHNNIE GATHERS, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Evans Correctional Institution, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER, South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:08-cv-03987-HMH-BM)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Gathers, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Heath McAlvin Stewart, III, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Gathers seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the order of the magistrate judge denying Gathers’ motion to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Gathers seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Gathers’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-038]


Sunshine Act Meeting Agency Holding the Meeting: United States 
International Trade Commission

TIME AND DATE: November 8, 2005 at 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None
    2. Minutes
    3. Ratification List
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-388-391 and 731-TA-816-821 (Review) (Cut-to-
Length Carbon Steel Plate from France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, 
and Korea)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled 
to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the 
Secretary of Commerce on or before November 21, 2005.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 27, 2005.

    By order of the Commission
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-21712 Filed 10-27-05; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

East West Bank


100
%East West Capital Trust I


100
%East West Capital Trust II


100
%East West Capital Statutory Trust III


100
%East West Capital Trust IV


100
%East West Capital Trust V


100
%East West Capital Trust VI


100
%East West Capital Trust VII


100
%East West Capital Trust VIII


100
%East West Capital Trust IX


100
%East West Insurance Services, Inc.


100
%East West Leasing (1)


100
%American International Bancorp, Inc. (1)


100
%United National Bancorp, Inc. (1)


100
%






---





QuickLinks
**Exhibit31.1**

**RIVERROCK ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Shawn S. Smyth, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the River RockEntertainment Authority;

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)            All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date:August 14, 2006
| By:                      | /s/ Shawn S.  Smyth |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Shawn S. Smyth           |                |
| Chief Executive  Officer |                |

 

----
Exhibit 10.3



PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of  900 -1281 West Georgia
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7, promises to pay to or to
the order of Amanda E. Johnson, ("the Payee") of 407 Haviland Drive, Patterson,
New York the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND FIFTEENUNITED STATES DOLLARS and
TWENTY CENTS ($107,015.20) with eight percent (8%) interest thereon, the sum
total principal and interest being due and payable ON DEMAND BY AMANDA E.
JOHNSON IN WRITING.

CYPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY WAY OF WRITEN
RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and payable under the laws of the State of New York, United States of
America.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day of June 2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation


<PAGE>
PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR INTEREST ACCRUED ON OUTSTANDING DEBT, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of
900 -1281 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7,
promises to pay to or to the order of Amanda E. Johnson, ("the Payee") of 407
Haviland Drive, Patterson, New York the sum of THIRTY TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
SIXTY FIVE UNITED STATES DOLLARS and NINETY NINE CENTS ($32,165.99) being due
and payable ON DEMAND BY AMANDA E. JOHNSON IN WRITING.

CYPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY
WAY OF WRI1TEN RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and payable under the laws of the State of New York, United States of
America.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day of  2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation


<PAGE>