alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.67

                             Second Lease Amendment

This Second Lease Amendment, entered into between Dianne R. Griffith (formerly
Dianne R. Martz) ("Landlord") and Hemophilia Health Services, Inc., formerly
known as Horizon Health System, Inc., a Tennessee corporation ("Tenant") with
regard to the following facts:

A.       The Tenant and Landlord entered into that certain Lease Agreement
         dated September 1, 1994 (the "Lease"), pursuant to which Tenant leased
         from Landlord that portion of a building (the "Building") owned by
         Landlord and which is located at 6820 Charlotte Pike, Nashville,
         Davidson County, Tennessee, and which consists of die entire first
         floor consisting of approximately 20,000 square feet and that portion
         of the second floor known as the finance and marketing area consisting
         of approximately 5,190 square feet.

B.       The parties wish to amend the Lease in order to add additional space
         on the second floor and to modify in certain other respects the Lease
         as specified below.

Now, therefore, for and in consideration of mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the sufficiency which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:

1.       Paragraph 1 of the Lease is amended by adding the following provisions
         thereto:

         For the time period which commences on April 15, 1999 and which
         expires on October 31, 1999, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord on or
         before the first day of each month, as rental for the use of 4,195
         additional square feet of office space located on the west side of the
         second floor (excluding storage room with supply elevator) during such
         month, the sum of four thousand four hundred fifty seven and 19/100
         dollars ($4,457.19).

In witness whereof the parties hereunto have executed this Second Lease
Amendment the 25th day of May 1999, the same is effective April 15, 1999,

                                    Tenant:
                                    Hemophilia Health Services, Inc.


                                    By: /s/ Randy Grow
                                       -------------------------------------
                                        President
                                       -------------------------------------


                                    Landlord


                                        /s/ Dianne R. Griffith
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Dianne R. Griffith
H. R. 5051 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 23 Genesee 

Street in Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Richard Carl Heinen *v.*Francis Rowley Heinen

No. 3490

(See 64 Nev. 627)

July 6, 1948.

*Per Curiam:*

Rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of MKA Capital, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:
(1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. MKA Capital, Inc Date: May 15, 2006 By: /s/ David Chen
-------------------------------- David Chen Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 15, 2006
                                                      By:  /S/ Ronald Gorthuis
                                                    --------------------------
                                                               Ronald Gorthuis
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 15, 2006
                                                 By:  /S/ Mordechay Kraselnick
                                                    --------------------------
                                                          Mordechay Kraselnick
                                                                      Chairman

Date:  May 15, 2006
                                                     By:  /S/ Ariel Kraselnick
                                                    --------------------------
                                                              Ariel Kraselnick
                                                                      Director
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAYWOOD E. HONEYCUTT

No. 7412SC83

(Filed 17 April 1974)

Criminal Law §§ 40, 89 — transcript of testimony at former trial — admissibility to show bias

Where a witness testified at two earlier trials of defendant at which the jury was unable to agree, the trial court did not err upon a third trial in allowing into evidence a transcript of the witness’s testimony at a former trial, since, at the time of the third trial, the witness was a fugitive from justice; however, the trial court did commit prejudicial error in refusing to allow defendant to testify about an earlier altercation he had had with the witness, since that evidence was admissible to show bias.

Appeal by defendant from *Braswell, Judge,*11 June 1973 Criminal Session of Superior Court held in Cumberland County.

Defendant was tried for murder. Two earlier trials for the homicide had resulted in mistrials after the jury could not reach a verdict. At both of the earlier trials one DeBerry, the State’s only witness to the killing, testified. DeBerry was not present at the trial from which defendant now appeals. Testimony on *voir dire*tended to show that DeBerry was a fugitive from justice. After appropriate findings, the court allowed the transcript of his testimony at the earlier trials to be read to the jury. Defendant contended that deceased, without provocation, made a deadly assault on him with a tractor crank and that he shot and killed in self-defense. The testimony of DeBerry tended to show that deceased had neither made nor threatened an assault on defendant. Defendant was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter and judgment imposing a prison sentence was entered.

*343
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan by Ralf F. Haskell,*As-*sistent Attorney General, for the State.*

*Rose, Thorp and Rand by Herbert H. Thorp; Smith, Patterson, Follín & Curtis by Norman B. Smith for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

It is obvious that the credibiltiy of DeBerry is critical in this case. At two earlier trials when DeBerry testified, the jury was unable to agree. At this trial, when DeBerry was not present but when the transcript of his earlier testimony was read to the jury, defendant was convicted. Because of the facts as found by the trial judge, it was not error to allow the transcript to be used even though it did deprive defendant of the opportunity to further cross-examine the witness and have the jury observe his demeanor. Defendant’s burden was prejudicially compounded, however, by the refusal of the court to allow him to testify about an earlier altercation he had had with the witness. The evidence should have been admitted for the purpose of showing bias.

The record discloses that DeBerry was apprehended by federal officers after defendant’s trial. Every reasonable effort should be made to have the witness present at the retrial of this case.

New trial.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K
(the "FORM 10-K") for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "ISSUER").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated:  March 8, 2005                             /s/ Richard W. Piacenti
                                                        ------------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 8th day of March 2005

/s/ Carmen M. Garcia
-------------------------------
Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7561
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GREGORY SEAN HENRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-52, CA-01-979-1) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Sean Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Sean Henry seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Henry has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Henry , Nos. CR-98-52; CA-01-979-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. NAU ANTONIO RIVER A-AC OSTA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10355

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-01536-DC B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na David C . B ury , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Na u Antonio R

ive ra -Ac osta

a p pe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 57-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), R

i ve ra -Ac osta ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no 

# FIL ED MAY27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c ord. W e have provide d R ive ra -Ac osta the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or an s we ring brie f ha s be e n file d . R ive ra -Ac osta

ha s wa i ve d his right to a

ppe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se eid . at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 3 - 1 0 3 5 5 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 62027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21572]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 62027]]

                Notice of October 25, 2005

                
Continuation of National Emergency Regarding the 
                Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

                On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, 
                President Clinton declared a national emergency with 
                respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
                national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
                United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, 
                biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass 
                destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 
                On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 
                13094 amending Executive Order 12938 to respond more 
                effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass 
                destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 
                I issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, 
                further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our 
                ability to combat proliferation. Because the 
                proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the 
                means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual 
                and extraordinary threat to the national security, 
                foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the 
                national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, 
                must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2005. In 
                accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive 
                Order 12938, as amended.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    October 25, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-21572
Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
```
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5254 

For the relief of Simaya T. K. Eversley. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Simaya T. K. Eversley. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SIMAYA T. 

4 K. EVERSLEY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Simaya T. K. Eversley shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5254 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Simaya T. K. 

2 Eversley enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Simaya T. K. Eversley, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5254 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Simaya T. K. Eversley 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21536]



[[Page 62162]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending October 7, 2005

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2000-8445.
    Date Filed: October 4, 2005.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 25, 2005.
    Description: Application Polar Air Cargo, Inc., requesting renewal 
of its experimental certificate of public convenience and necessity for 
Route 626, authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air 
transportation of property and mail between the coterminal points 
Miami, FL and Los Angeles, CA; the intermediate points Curacao, 
Netherlands Antilles; Santiago, Chile, Barranquilla, Colombia; and 
Panama City, Panama; and the coterminal points Manaus, Rio je Janeiro 
and Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-21536 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10205 and <greek-i> 10206]


Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00004

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated: 09/24/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident period: 09/23/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 10/14/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006.

Addresses: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Assistance Processing and Disbursement Center, 
14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, 
Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Parish: Livingston.
Contiguous Parish: Louisiana: Saint Helena.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-21444 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P