alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,588,434
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,301,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         143,096,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                 98,675,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,388,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53,388,039
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,119,099
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,654,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,504,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,770,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                        |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert J. Finch, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date:  May 13,  2005                By: /s/ Albert J. Finch
      -------------------               ----------------------------------------
                                        Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Irvin E. Richter

Irvin E. Richter

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 10, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Labor. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting November 14, 2005. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Office of Trade Agreement Implementation (OTAI) gives notice of a meeting of the National Advisory Committee for Labor Provisions of U.S. Free-trade Agreements, which was established by the Secretary of Labor. 

The Committee was established to provide advice to the U.S. Department of Labor on matters pertaining to the implementation and further elaboration of the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), the labor side accord to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the labor chapters of free-trade agreements. The Committee is authorized under NAALC and the free-trade agreements. 

The Committee consists of twelve independent representatives drawn from among labor organizations, business and industry, educational institutions, and the general public. 

# DATES:

The Committee will meet on November 14, 2005 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Executive Conference Room at 4 C-5521 (Center Conference Rooms C 5515), Washington, DC 20210. The meeting is open to the public on a first-come, first served basis. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Peter Accolla, designated Federal Officer, Office of Trade Agreement Implementation, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-5205, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone 202-693-4900 (this is not a toll free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Please refer to the notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 23, 2004 (69 FR 77128) for supplementary information.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, on October 6, 2005. 

Dr. Peter Accolla, 

Acting Director, U.S. National Administrative Office. 

[FR Doc. 05-20511 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
<Page>
                                                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
(and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
Registration Statement File No. 333-69429 for Hartford Life and Annuity
Insurance Company Separate Account Ten on Form N-4.


Hartford, Connecticut                           /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
April 11, 2002
**Exhibit
      32.2**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Collexis Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
      Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:




|1. | The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






November
      14, 2008


/s/ Mark MurphyMark
              Murphy
              Chief
                Financial Officer
/s/ Justice Lee Gabriel

In the 

Court of Appeals 

Second Appellate District of Texas 

at Fort Worth 

No. 02-19-00340-CR 

JALEEL FRANKLIN, Appellant § On Appeal from the 432nd District Court 

§ of Tarrant County (1368033D) 

V. § November 14, 2019 

§ Opinion by Justice Gabriel 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § (nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By ______________ ~ 

Justice Lee Gabriel
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

W.F., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, NORTH TEXAS 

PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER,

Coppell, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0675

Issued: April 29, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 20, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a February 19, 2021 merit decision

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0675.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the February 19, 2021 decision was August 18, 2021. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until February 20, 2022,more than 180 days after 

the February 19, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0675

is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

offered a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision 

issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the 

appeal docketed as No. 22-0675, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0675 is dismissed.

Issued: April 29, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
Exhibit 11

            INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                                  (unaudited)

                     (in thousands, except per share amounts)




                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED 
                                Nov. 30,   Nov. 30,    Nov. 30,   Nov. 30,
                                   1996       1995        1996       1995

Average shares of
  common stock outstanding       17,980     17,967      17,980     17,959
Common stock equivalents              1        125          10        101
Total common stock and 
  equivalents assuming
  full dilution                  17,981     18,092      17,990     18,060

Net earnings                     $8,636     $6,792     $12,198    $18,343

Less dividends on 
  redeemable preferred stock          -          -           -       (260)

Net earnings 
  applicable to common stock     $8,636     $6,792     $12,198    $18,083

Earnings per 
  share of common stock:
    Primary                      $  .48     $  .38     $  .68     $  1.01
    Fully diluted                $  .48     $  .38     $  .68     $  1.00

Primary earnings per share has been computed by dividing net earnings, 
after deduction of preferred stock dividends, by the weighted average 
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Common 
stock options and other common stock equivalents have not entered into the 
primary earnings per share computations since their effect is not 
significant.

Fully diluted earnings per share has been computed assuming issuance of 
all shares for stock options deemed to be common stock equivalents, using 
the treasury stock method.
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2010
#### DOUGLAS J. VENABLE, Appellant, v. MARY B. SANFORD, Respondent.

No. 7298

April 19, 1974

520 P.2d 959

*Michael L. Hines,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Douglas R. Pike,*of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Mary B. Sanford commenced this action in the district court to recover $7,050, which she claimed was due and owing her from appellant, Douglas J. Venable. The court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of Mary. Douglas has appealed, seeking reversal on the ground that the judgment was not supported by the record.

The sole issue presented is whether there is substantial evidence in the proceedings below to support the findings of the court. Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Deneen, 89 Nev. 98, 507 P.2d 140 (1973). We have reviewed the record, and we find that such evidence does exist. Therefore, we affirm.
Exhibit 23.1



LOGO

CONSENT OF CAWLEY, GILLESPIE &
ASSOCIATES, INC.

February 28, 2014

Permian Basin Royalty Trust

Bank of America, N.A., Trustee

901 Main Street, 17th Floor

Dallas, Texas 75202-3714

Gentlemen:

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., hereby consents to the use of the oil and gas reserve information in the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013 and in the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ending December 31,
2013, based on reserve reports dated February 17, 2014, prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.



Submitted,Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693LOGOKenneth J. Mueller, P. E. 86132Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00866-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.F., A.F.F. and E.H.F., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05746

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 27, 2015

DISMISSED 

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, 

and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

PER CURIAM
#### DARLENE R. BOYLE, Appellant, v. LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk of the County of Clark, and the STATE OF NEVADA as Surety on the Official Bond of Loretta Bowman, Respondents.

No. 10440

February 6, 1980

605 P.2d 1144

*141
      *John W. Bonner,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Burleigh & Benson, Chtd.,*Las Vegas, for Respondent Bowman.

*Richard H. Bryan,*Attorney General, and *Robert H. Ulrich,*Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent State of Nevada.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In July of 1970, appellant filed a personal injury action against Gail Cox. After an answer was filed and the parties exchanged interrogatories, trial was set for May 8, 1972, but was vacated at the behest of appellant in order to obtain additional discovery. On October 23, 1973, a note for trial docket was sent to appellant informing her that a trial date would be set on October 26. On that date a trial date was set for June 6, 1975. No notice of the trial date was sent to appellant. On the date set for trial, appellant failed to appear. The trial date was vacated. Thereafter, on August 13, 1975, the defendant moved to dismiss for want of prosecution within five years. NRCP 41(e).

Appellant retained counsel and opposed the motion to dismiss claiming that she was not served with notice of the trial *142and was thus unable to take any action in her behalf. The court granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice. No appeal from that order was taken. Subsequently, on April 22, 1977, appellant filed the present action against the County Clerk and the Board of Examiners for the State as surety on the Public Official Bond of the County Clerk. The trial court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim. Upon appeal, we need only decide whether any action may be brought by a private person against the county clerk under a public official bond. We have determined that appellant has not stated a claim and affirm the decision of the lower court.

The bond here stated in part that the state “shall be liable only . . . [for] the loss of any public funds occurring through or resulting from defalcation, misappropriation or negligent loss of such public funds, and/or any loss resulting from failure of such official faithfully to perform the duties of his office . . . .” The language of this bond closely parallels the language of the statutes to which the bond specifically states it is subject. *See*1963 Nev. Stats., ch. 301, at 544-47 (amending NRS 282.240, 282.280, 282.320, 282.330). In 1963, the legislature deleted the words “tortious misconduct or other wrongful acts” from the list of actions for which an official could be liable on a bond. Looking at all sections of this statute, it is apparent that the language “from failure of such officials faithfully to perform the duties of their offices” refers to monetary losses to counties or cities. As under the present law, there is no indication that private individuals may recover on the bond and no procedures are set forth for such recovery. Had the legislature intended inclusion, it would have specifically so provided.

We affirm the decision of the lower court dismissing the action for failure to state a claim.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.C., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

North Reading, MA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0484

Issued: June 25, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On January 28, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a December 29, 2020 nonmerit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0484.

In a letter dated and received May 20, 2021, appellant requested that the appeal be 

dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-0484 is dismissed.

Issued: June 25, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board