alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements
of operations of the Company's Form 10-Q, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              60
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      516
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23
<INVENTORY>                                        528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1252
<PP&E>                                            1450
<DEPRECIATION>                                     571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1027
<BONDS>                                            944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                         945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3767    
<SALES>                                           1903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1903
<CGS>                                             1025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    179 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                121 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      23 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       144 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99 
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5042 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5042

To amend section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow for 
   a private civil action against a person that provides substantial 
                  assistance in violation of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2010

Ms. Waters (for herself and Mr. Frank of Massachusetts) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
  Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow for 
   a private civil action against a person that provides substantial 
                  assistance in violation of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Liability for Aiding and Abetting 
Securities Violations Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE CIVIL ACTIONS FOR AIDING AND ABETTING.

    Section 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78t(e)) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Prosecution 
        of'' and inserting ``Actions Against'';
            (2) by striking ``For purposes'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Actions brought by commission.--For purposes'';
            (3) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by inserting ``or 
        recklessly'' after ``knowingly''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Private civil actions.--For purposes of any private 
        civil action implied under this title, any person that 
        knowingly or recklessly provides substantial assistance to 
        another person in violation of this title, or of any rule or 
        regulation issued under this title, shall be deemed to be in 
        violation of this title to the same extent as the person to 
        whom such assistance is provided.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The
Beacon Financial Futures Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Stratton, the Chief
Executive Officer of Beacon Management Corporation (USA) as General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



THE BEACON FINANCIAL FUTURES FUND, L.P.By: Beacon Management Corporation (USA), General Partner of the PartnershipBy:

/s/ Mark S. StrattonMark S. Stratton Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2006


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the
extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**

 

I, Calvin A. Wallen, III,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to this annual report on Form 10-KSB/Aof Cubic Energy, Inc.

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport.

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and,

 

(c) disclosedin this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial    reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 5, 2008

 
| Signature:  | /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III      |   |
|------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|             | Calvin A. Wallen, III,  C.E.O. |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bull Run Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and
belief:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: November 29, 2004/s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSON

Frederick J. EricksonVice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk November 2 , 2018

156777 (56)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 156777

v COA: 332694

Allegan CC: 13

- 018428

- FH

JOSHUA LEE THORPE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time for

filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before December 20, 2018.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven G. Singer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Steven G. Singer
Steven G. Singer
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2002
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BILLY PARKER

No. 757SC165

(Filed 7 May 1975)

On *certiorari*to review proceedings before *Rouse, Judge.*Judgments entered 25 February 1974 in Superior Court, Edge-combe County. Heard in the Court of Appeals .17 April 1975.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Robert P. Gruber, for the State.*

*Howard S. Boney, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, PARKER and VAUGHN, Judges.

No error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7123

ANTONIO SANTELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. E. LAFAVE, Lieutenant,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA99-1801-PJM)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Santell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order denying the motion to

vacate is marked as “filed” on July 30, 1999, the district court’s

records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on August 2,

1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket

sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 803 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Santell appeals the district court’s orders summarily

dismissing his civil right complaint and denying his motion to

vacate. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Santell v. Lafave, No. CA-99-

1801-PJM (D. Md. July 9 & Aug. 2, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61748-61749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2659; MB Docket No. 04-376; RM-11039]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Haven and Hutchinson, KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Ad Astra per Aspera 
Broadcasting, Inc., reallots Channel 246C2 from Hutchinson to Haven, 
Kansas, and modifies Station KSKU(FM)'s license accordingly. See 69 FR 
60344, October 8, 2004. Channel 246C2 can be allotted to Haven in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation

[[Page 61749]]

requirements with a site restriction of 24.9 kilometers (15.5 miles) 
southeast at petitioner's requested site. The reference coordinates for 
Channel 246C2 at Haven are 37-47-47 North Latitude and 97-31-59 West 
Longitude.

DATES: Effective November 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-376, adopted October 4, 2005, and 
released October 6, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may 
be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy 
and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 
20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Kansas, is 
amended by removing Channel 246C2 at Hutchinson; and by adding Haven, 
Channel 246C2.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21299 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
#### ELLIS SANDERS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7505

December 23, 1974

529 P.2d 206

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General; *Roy A. Woofter,*District Attorney, and *Dan M. Seaton,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Ellis Sanders, the appellant, was found guilty of rape. The sole issue raised on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence as to the victim’s identification of Sanders as the perpetrator of the crime.

*434The defendant, Sanders, contends that due to an inconsistency in the victim’s description of her assailant made shortly after the attack upon her and testimony offered by Sanders as to his appearance on the date the criminal act took place, and the nature of the circumstances of the attack, in that the victim only observed her assailant momentarily after just awakening from a nap and only having observed his hand and facial profile, there was not sufficient evidence of identification.

The evidence shows that the victim had an opportunity to observe her assailant clearly while he was standing under a light, even though only for a short period of time, and that the assailant spoke to her several times during the course of the commission of the crime. Based on this, the victim made an unequivocal and positive lineup identification and voice identification of Sanders as her assailant prior to trial and again at trial positively identified him as the culprit. Testimony offered at trial indicated that the description given by the victim shortly after the crime fit Sanders except for the discrepancy as to the assailant being clean shaven and the testimony offered by Sanders to show that on the date in question he had a goatee and a slight mustache. As to this, the evidence showed that Sanders’ facial coloring and goatee and mustache were of such nature that the goatee and mustache could be missed under the circumstances that the victim observed Sanders, in that he was approximately 15 feet from her when she observed him, she observed him for only a short time, and the goatee was short and the mustache slight.

Where there is substantial evidence to support a verdict in a criminal case, as the record indicates exists in this case, the reviewing court will not disturb the verdict nor set aside the judgment. Henry v. State, 83 Nev. 194, 196, 426 P.2d 791 (1967).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 21


Subsidiaries
The Significant subsidiaries of Sears, Roebuck and Co., the names under which
such subsidiaries do business, and the states or countries in which each was
organized, were as follows as January 3, 1998:

                                                         Place of
      Names                                              Organization

Consolidated Subsidiaries:
All American                                             Florida
Florida Builders                                         Florida
Maxserv Inc.                                             Delaware
Orchard Supply Hardware Corporation                      Delaware
Sears Canada Inc.                                        Canada
   Sears Acceptance Company Inc.                         Canada
Sears Logistics Services, Inc.                           Delaware
Sears National Bank                                      United States
Sears Overseas Finance N.V.                              Netherlands,
                                                          Antilles
SRFG, Inc.                                               Delaware
Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.                           Delaware
Sears, Roebuck de Puerto Rico, Inc.                      Delaware
Sears Wishbook, Inc.                                     Delaware
Western Auto Supply Company                              Delaware
   Tire America Inc.                                     Delaware
   NTW  Incorporated                                     Delaware

87 other companies                                       Various  
        
        The Company owns 20% to 50% if the outstanding voting securities of
31 companies which are accounted for on an equity method.  

        The Company has investments in a number of other corporations
representing substantial percentages (but not more than 20 percent ) of their
outstanding capital stock.  The Company disclaims control of any such
companies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATION BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         11,885
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 116,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,746
<INVENTORY>                                   161,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              417,722
<PP&E>                                        279,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                125,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                693,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         283,724
<BONDS>                                       121,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                    246,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  693,018
<SALES>                                     1,112,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,112,273
<CGS>                                       1,024,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,024,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,454)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (128,922)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (138,949)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.40)
        


        

</TABLE>