alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7989-6] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of cost recovery settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency has offered a cost recovery settlement at the College Grove Battery Chip Superfund Site (Site) located in College Grove, Williamson/Rutherford Counties, Tennessee. EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement until November 28, 2005. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

                        Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, South West, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, E-mail:                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.gov.*

Written or e-mail comments may be submitted to Paula V. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: October 12, 2005. 

De'Lyntoneus Moore, 

Acting Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-21459 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
| (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               | TNT      DESIGNS, INC.                                                                 |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                   |   |
| Date:  May      15, 2009 | By:                                                                                    | /s/ Anju Tandon |
|                               | Anju      Tandon                                                                       |
|                               | President      and Chief Executive                                                     |
|                               | Officer      and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting      Officer) |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Modoc County Speaker, and Tehama County Speaker, (5) Sub-Committee Reports, (6) Chairman's Perspective, (7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, (9) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 10, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, PO Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; E-Mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by November 7, 2005 will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: October 25, 2005.

James F. Giachino,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-21610  Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. OTIS ODELL TURNER

No. 7520SCS8

(Filed 2 April 1975)

1. Constitutional Law § 32— failure to appoint counsel — waiver of counsel

The trial court did not err in failing to appoint counsel to represent defendant where defendant effectively waived counsel after being fully informed by the court that he was entitled to representation, that if he could not afford a lawyer, one would be appointed for him, and that he was subject to a prison sentence if convicted.

2. Automobiles § 3— driving while license suspended — sufficiency of evidence

The evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of driving on a public highway while his license was suspended.

Appeal by defendant from *Webb, Judge.*Judgment entered 15 August 1974 in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 19 March 1975.

Defendant was tried in district court on a warrant charging him with operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while his operator’s license was suspended. He was found guilty in that court and from judgment imposed, appealed to superior court where he pleaded not guilty. A jury found him guilty as charged and from judgment imposing prison term of six months, he appealed to this court.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Elisha H. Bunting, Jr., for the State.*

*Smith & Thigpen, by J. Stephen Gaydica III, for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

[1] By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the superior court erred in not appointing counsel to represent him at his trial. We find no merit in the assignment. The record clearly discloses that defendant effectively waived counsel after being fully informed by the court that he was entitled to representation, that if he could not afford a lawyer, one would be appointed for him, and that he was subject to a prison sentence if convicted.

*322
      [2] By his other assignment of error, defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and the judgment. This assignment has no merit. After a careful review of the testimony presented at trial, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and the judgment and no worthwhile purpose would be served in relating the testimony here.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Martin concur.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Plant City, FL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0595

Issued: October 20, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On January 23, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a purported December 13, 2019 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards docketed the appeal as No. 20-0595. 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed the appeal.2 The Board concludes that the case record as transmitted to the Board 

does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of 

docketing of the current appeal.3

Although the case record does contain a letter from OWCP dated December 13, 2019, it is 

informational in nature. By the December 13, 2019 letter, OWCP responded to appellant’s 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3

Id.
2

November 13, 2019 request to have her case for a schedule award reopened. It notified her that in 

order to have her case reopened, she had 15 days to accept the position offered to her by the 

employing establishment and report for duty, as it constituted suitable work, and if she refused the 

offer of suitable work, it would terminate her wage-loss compensation and entitlement to a 

schedule award, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8106(c)(2). The case is therefore in an interlocutory 

posture as OWCP is in the process of developing the suitable work issue. 4

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds that the December 13, 2019 letter does not 

constitute a final adverse OWCP decision. As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 20-0595 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 20-0595 is dismissed.

Issued: October 20, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 Section 501.2(c)(2) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure, provides: “There will be no appeal with respect to any 

interlocutory matter decided (or not decided) by OWCP during the pendency of a case.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(2).
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.S., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, EAST CHICAGO 

POST OFFICE, East Chicago, IN, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0032

Issued: September 30, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On October 5, 2020 the Clerk of the Appellate Boards inadvertently assigned Docket No. 

21-0032 to a purported appeal from a decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs 

(OWCP).

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that this appeal was inadvertently 

docketed. Section 501.3(a) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides that a “person adversely 

affected by a final decision of the Director [of OWCP] or his or her authorized Representative, 

may file for review of such decision by the Board.”

1

 The Board concludes that neither a “person 

adversely affected” by a final OWCP decision, nor an “authorized Representative,” has filed an 

application for review by the Board of a final decision issued by OWCP. As such, there is no valid 

appeal before the Board and Docket No. 21-0032 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

 

1

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(a).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0032 is dismissed.

Issued: September 30, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
EXHIBIT 12
 CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(in thousands, except ratios)
 Fiscal Years2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Income (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    (128,944
    )
    
    $
    (218,059
    )
    
    $
    (95,255
    )
    
    $
    (134,912
    )
    
    $
    (284,207
    )Add: loss (income) from equity
method investments
    
    
    (2,804
    )
    
    
    (51,182
    )
    
    
    8,164
    
    
    
    10,642
    
    
    
    (14,422
    )Add: fixed charges-Interest expense, including amortization
of debt issuance costs
    
    
    31,598
    
    
    
    40,783
    
    
    
    34,377
    
    
    
    29,935
    
    
    
    26,952Interest element of rent expense
    
    
    1,414
    
    
    
    655
    
    
    
    789
    
    
    
    1,055
    
    
    
    1,065Total fixed charges
    
    
    33,012
    
    
    
    41,438
    
    
    
    35,166
    
    
    
    30,990
    
    
    
    28,017Total earnings (losses) available
for fixed charges
    
    
    (98,736
    )
    
    
    (227,803
    )
    
    $
    (51,925
    )
    
    $
    (93,280
    )
    
    $
    (270,612
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of calculating this ratio, earnings consist of income (loss) from continuing
operations before (i) income taxes, (ii) income (loss) from equity method investments and
(iii) fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortization of
debt issuance costs, and the portion of rent expense which we believe is representative of the
interest component of rental expense. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
$98.7 million, $227.8 million, $51.9 million, $93.3 million and $270.6 million for fiscal
years 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.
#### EARL F. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. NORMA M. MARKETTI, Respondent.

No. 7139

February 6, 1974

518 P.2d 1244

*Hibbs & Bullís, Ltd.,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*Breen, Young, Whitehead & Hoy, Chartered,*and *David R. Belding,*of Reno, for Respondent.

*71OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal is from a judgment awarding respondent $6,-674.20 damages sustained in an automobile collision in 1970, entered upon a jury verdict, and awarding $1,500 as an attorney fee.

Appellant’s prime contention is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the “last clear chance doctrine.” In our view, however, the record contains substantial evidence that a last clear opportunity existed for appellant to avoid the accident. That being so, the fact that the accident occurred at an intersection did not of itself preclude a “last clear chance” instruction. Cf. Armstrong v. Onufrock, 75 Nev. 342, 341 P.2d 105 (1959).

Appellant also contends necessary language was omitted from the court’s “last clear chance” instruction. We decline to consider this claim of nonjurisdictional error, raised for the first time on appeal. Cummings v. City of Las Vegas Mun. Corp., 88 Nev. 479, 499 P.2d 650 (1972); Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp., 87 Nev. 441, 488 P.2d 911 (1971).

Other assignments of error have been considered. Upon review of the record, we find no error affecting substantial rights of the parties. NRCP 61.

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Michael D. Weaver   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael                D. Weaver       |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer |   |
| May                9, 2008             |   |

----
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT




Each of
the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:




(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      April 14, 2009
              /s/
      Van Z. Krikorian
                  Van
      Z. Krikorian
                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
   Date:
      April 14, 2009
              /s/
      Jan E. Dulman
                  Jan
      E. Dulman
                  Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         410,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  795,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,089,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,320,272
<PP&E>                                       1,334,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,074,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,646,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          581,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,427,947
<OTHER-SE>                                    (49,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,646,090
<SALES>                                      5,683,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,730,513
<CGS>                                        3,483,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,230,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (499,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (500,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Montrez Benjamin WILLIAMS

233P12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2018

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Montrez Benjamin.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of October 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of October 2018."