alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Charles ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-1475.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1972.

James C. Anderson, pro se.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appel-lee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The opinion of this Court dated January 21, 1972 is withdrawn. Immediately prior to the issuance of this opinion the petitioner-appellant lodged with the Clerk of this Court copies of papers as-sertedly filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas and in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which sought habeas corpus relief on substantially the identical bases advanced in the present United States District Court proceedings. After the opinion was published these matters were brought to the Court’s attention. We treat their filing as a Petition for Rehearing.

In view of this filing and the fact that the memorandum order and judgment of the court below was based upon information informally conveyed to the district judge by appointed counsel, we deem the interests of justice to require that the cause be remanded to the district court with directions to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Texas post-conviction procedures have been exhausted as to petitioner’s allegations of denial of counsel at the time of his confession and ineffective assistance of counsel at the time of trial. The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward to the Clerk of the district court all papers lodged by petitioner, for the district court’s use in connection with such hearing. If it appears that such State court procedures have exhausted petitioner’s post-conviction remedies, the district court is directed to vacate its order and proceed with the determination of petitioner’s right to federal habeas corpus relief. If it appears that post-conviction remedies of the State of Texas have not been exhausted, the district court is directed to supplement the record before this Court with the record developed, as directed herein.

Remanded with directions.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D 16-0034

Lower Tribunal No. 15-15 284

________________



### V.T.

, the Father,

Appellant,

vs.



### The Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cindy S.

Lederman, Judge.

Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura J. Lee

(Sanford), for the Guardian ad Litem Program, for appellees.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.We affirm. The trial court's final order terminating the parental rights of the

father is supported by competent substantial evidence.

Affirmed.

2
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (FileNos. 333-93423, 333-38078, 333-44794, 333-57486, 333-84904, 333-104108, 333-113651, 333-123323,333-132478 and 333-138898) pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 InternationalStock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock Option Plan, the 1999Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan of Maxygen, Inc.,of our reports dated March 13, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofMaxygen, Inc., Maxygen, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Maxygen,Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  Palo Alto, California
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffrey R. Steinhilber, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         Date: August 10, 2005 By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber               Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber      Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 08-3650

_____________

In re: GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

 Debtors

------------------------------

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY; 

FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY CO; 

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; 

CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as successor to CIGNA Specialty Company, 

formerly known as California Union Insurance Company; 

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, for itself and for International 

Insurance Company (now known as TIG Insurance Company)

(by operation of novation all rights and obligations under the policies 

have been transferred from International Insurance Co. to Westchester Fire Insurance Co.);

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

PITTSBURGH, PA; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA;

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, 

and any other entities related to American International Group, Inc. 

that engaged in business transactions with the Reorganizing Debtors, 

 Appellants

PRESENT: MCKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER,

CHAGARES, JORDAN, VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it

is ordered that the Clerk of this Court list the above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience

of the Court.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Judge 

DATED: June 10, 2010

tyw/cc: All counsel of record
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-215]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

33 CFR Part 151

[USCG-2004-19621]
RIN 1625-AA89


Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes; Correction

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of inquiry; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a document in the Federal Register 
of December 27, 2004, requesting information about the current status 
of dry cargo operations on the Great Lakes. The document contained an 
incorrect ACTION caption.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Mary Sohlberg, 
U.S. Coast Guard, Environmental Standards Division, telephone: (202) 
267-0713, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec819f8384808e899e8bac8f83818898c2999f8f8bc2818580"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0568766a6d696760776245666a6861712b707666622b686c69">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 27, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-28227, 
(69 FR 77147), correct the ACTION caption to read:

ACTION: Notice of inquiry.

    Dated: December 30, 2004.
David L. Nichols,
CDR, USCG Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, Acting.
[FR Doc. 05-215 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2015023EN.01001901.xml

| 29.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/19

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 381 of 28 December 2006
  )

On page 4, recital 3, second sentence, and footnote 5:

for:

‘Council Decision 2006/000/JHA of ... on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (5) constitutes ...

read:

‘Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (5) constitutes ...

on page 15, Article 27(3) and page 16, Article 31(6):

for:

‘Decision 2006/000/JHA’,

read:

‘Decision 2007/533/JHA’.

---

(5)  OJ L ...’

5

(5)  
  OJ L 205, 7.8.2007, p. 63.’

5

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of AFP Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Vozick, Co-Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/       David
      Vozick




David
      Vozick,


Chairman
      of the Board


Co-Principal
      Executive Officer


October
      12, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                 [LETTERHEAD OF LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L. PIKE]


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                                October 8, 1997


Luther Medical Products, Inc.
14332 Chambers Road
Tustin, California 92680


Gentlemen:

        I hereby consent to the use of my name in the Prospectus on Form S-8, 
File No. 33-15612, and the use of my opinion as an exhibit to said Registration 
Statement with the amendment of said Registration Statement by the incorporation
of the Annual Report on Form 10KSB, File No. 0-9570 of Luther Medical Products, 
Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1997.


                                        Respectfully submitted

                                        /s/ ROBERT L. PIKE
                                        -------------------
                                        Robert L. Pike
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34760]


Arkansas Southern Railroad, Inc.--Lease Exemption--The Kansas 
City Southern Railway Company

    Arkansas Southern Railroad, Inc. (ARSR), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from The 
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and operate approximately 61 miles 
of rail lines located in Arkansas and Oklahoma. The rail lines extend 
from: (1) Milepost 4.0, near Heavener, OK, to milepost 33.0, at the end 
of the track at Waldron, AR; and (2) milepost 32.0, at Ashdown, AR, to 
milepost 0.0, at the end of the track near Nashville, AR, not including 
the 601 track switch at Ashdown, AR.
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 34761, Watco 
Companies, Inc.--Continuance in Control Exemption--Arkansas Southern 
Railroad, Inc., wherein Watco Companies, Inc., has filed a notice of 
exemption to continue in control of ARSR upon its becoming a Class III 
rail carrier.
    ARSR certifies that its projected revenues as a result of the 
transaction will not result in ARSR's becoming a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier. ARSR also certifies that its projected annual revenues 
will not exceed $5 million.
    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
October 9, 2005.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34760, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Of Counsel, Ball 
Janik, LLP, 1455 F Street, NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: October 21, 2005.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-21402 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      John
      Works, Chief Executive Officer of Rancher Energy Corp. (the Company), certify,
      that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
      Code:




(1)  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
      30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
      the
      periods expressed in the Report.




/s/
                John WorksJohn
                WorksChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                13, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                STATE OR OTHER         OTHER NAME, IF ANY,
                                                 JURISDICTION       THAT THE SUBSIDIARY DOES
                    NAME                       OF INCORPORATION          BUSINESS UNDER
                    ----                       ----------------     ------------------------
<S>                                            <C>                <C>
BowSteel Corporation.........................     Delaware
BowSteel of Texas Corporation................     Delaware
Claro Precision, Inc. .......................      Canada
Earthline Technologies, Inc. ................       Ohio
ETCA G.P., L.L.C. ...........................       Texas
ETCA L.P., Inc. .............................     Delaware
Extrusion Technology Corporation of
  America....................................       Ohio
Galt Alloys, Inc. ...........................       Ohio
NATI Gas Company.............................       Ohio
New Century Metals, Inc. ....................       Ohio
New Century Metals Southeast, Inc. ..........     Delaware        New Century Metals and RTI LA
Pierce-Spafford Metals Company, Inc. ........    California
Reamet, S.A. ................................      France
RMI Delaware, Inc. ..........................     Delaware
RMI Metals, Inc. ............................       Utah          Micron Metals, Inc.
RMI Titanium Company.........................       Ohio
RMI Titanium International, Inc. ............     Barbados
RTI Claro....................................      Canada
RTI Commercial Products, Inc. ...............       Ohio
RTI Energy Systems, Inc. ....................       Ohio
RTI Europe Ltd. .............................  United Kingdom
RTI Fabrications, L.P. ......................       Texas
RTI Fabrication & Distribution, Inc. ........       Ohio
RTI France S.A.S. ...........................      France
RTI International Metals Gmbh................      Germany
RTI International Metals Limited.............  United Kingdom
RTI International Metals Srl.................       Italy
RTI St. Louis, Inc. .........................     Missouri
Tradco, Inc. ................................     Missouri
Weld-Tech Engineering Services, L.P. ........       Texas         RTI Energy Systems
Weld-Tech G.P., Inc. ........................       Texas
Weld-Tech L.P., Inc. ........................     Delaware
</Table>
Global-e-Investments, Inc.

2925 N. 67 th Place  Scottsdale, AZ  85251







Letter of Understanding for Consulting Services



This Agreement is entered into by and between Global-e-Investments,Inc.,hereafter Consultant, and Mountain Brook Golf Club, hereafter the Company.



The undersigned do hereby covenant, contract and agree as follows:



1.

Scope of Services:  Consultant is hereby engaged to perform consulting services to The Company including, but not limited to the following:

Public Relations, and Business Plan Development to include and focus primarily on Tee Sheet Reservation Improvement and Public Awareness.



2.

Initial Fee:  The Company agrees to pay the Consultant a nonrefundable Initial fee of $5000. Payment shall be due upon receipt of  invoice.



3.

Limited Services:  The Consultant will assist the company in accordance to the scope of services.  Services not included in the Scope of Service may be performed by the Consultant at the request of the Company for a fee of $90/hour, pending discussion and approval by both the Consultant and the Company.



4.

Confidential Information:  Consultant expressly agrees not to divulge, publish, or communicate any information regarding the Company, or its financial conditions to any persons without the express written consent of the Company.  All information obtained by the Consultant during this engagement and all suggestions and recommendations received by the Company will remain the property of the Company and the Consultant shall keep all such matters confidential.



5.

Term:  The term of this engagement shall commence on September 3, 2004 and shall remain in effect unless terminated in writing, with 30 days notice, by either the Company or the Consultant.



6.

In the event that it becomes necessary to enforce any of the terms of this agreement the defaulting party agrees to pay all reasonable attorney fees incurred therein.



7.

This agreement may only be modified in writing and contains the entire terms of the agreement between the parties.



Signed and Witnessed by both parties on  September 3, 2004.





/s/John Shaffer

/s/ Steve Loy

John Shaffer, et al

Mountain Brook Golf Club



Global-e-Investments, Inc

Steve Loy, et al

Consultant"                                             
Company
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5236 

To amend SAFETEA–LU to ensure that projects that assist the establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems are eligible for certain 

grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. TANNER, Mr. CHILDERS, Mr. BERRY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. GRANGER, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

PERLMUTTER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. PASCRELL, and Mr. YARMUTH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend SAFETEA–LU to ensure that projects that assist 

the establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems 

are eligible for certain grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aerotropolis Act of 

5 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5236 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIGNIFI2 CANCE. 

3 (a) ELIGIBLE PROJECT DEFINED.—Section 

4 1301(c)(2) of SAFETEA–LU (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is 

5 amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(2) ELIGIBLE PROJECT.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘eligible 

8 project’ means any surface transportation 

9 project eligible for Federal assistance under 

10 title 23, United States Code, including freight 

11 railroad projects and activities eligible under 

12 such title. 

13 ‘‘(B) INCLUSION OF AEROTROPOLIS

14 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PROJECTS.—The 

15 term ‘eligible project’ includes a combination of 

16 projects described in subparagraph (A) that, as 

17 a group— 

18 ‘‘(i) assist the establishment of an 

19 aerotropolis transportation system; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) satisfy the requirement under 

21 subsection (d).’’. 

22 (b) AEROTROPOLIS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DE23 FINED.—Section 1301(c) of SAFETEA–LU (23 U.S.C. 

24 101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(4) AEROTROPOLIS TRANSPORTATION SYS26 TEM.—The term ‘aerotropolis transportation system’ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5236 IH

1 means a planned and coordinated multimodal freight 

2 and passenger transportation network that, as deter3 mined by the Secretary, provides efficient, sustain4 able, and intermodal connectivity to a defined region 

5 of economic significance centered around a major 

6 airport.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS