alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62143-62144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 23, 2005, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a Waste 
Management permit application received. A Waste Management permit was 
issued on October 24, 2005 to the

[[Page 62144]]

following applicant: Michael J. Libecki Permit No.: 2006 WM-001.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21565 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SEDGIE R. DANIELS

No. 754SC94

(Filed 7 May 1975)

Appeal by defendant from *Fountain, Judge.*Judgment entered 9 September 1974 in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 9 April 1975.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Associate Attorney Jesse C. Brake for the State.*

*William J. Morgan for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, HEDRICK and MARTIN, Judges.

No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 31, 2005, 2 p.m. to October 31, 2005, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 18, 2005, 70 FR 60547-60548.                

The meeting will be held November 4, 2005, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 20, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-21658  Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

               [Letterhead of Ryder Scott Company appears here]

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     We hereby consent to the use of this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our 
reserve reports dated September 25, 1997 and February 18, 1998 relating to the 
oil and gas reserves of Bellwether Exploration Company at July 1, 1997 and 
January 1, 1998, respectively. We also consent to the references to us under the
heading "Supplemental Information" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial 
Statements of Bellwether Exploration Company in such report.

                             /s/ Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
                             --------------------------------------------
                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                             PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
March 6, 1998


                 [Address of Ryder Scott Company appears here]
**Exhibit31.2**

**RIVERROCK ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jacob A. Coughlin,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No.1 of the River Rock EntertainmentAuthority;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: April 17, 2007
| By:                                                           | /s/ Jacob A.  Coughlin |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Jacob A. Coughlin                                             |
| Assistant Financial Controller (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that, under the authority vested in me by 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services, I have redelegated to the 
Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, with the 
authority to further redelegate, the authority to continue the 
administration of grants and contracts initially awarded in the Fiscal 
Years 2002, 2003 and 2004 under the Special Projects of Regional and 
National Significance (SPRANS) Community-based Abstinence Education 
Program, pursuant to Title V, section 501(a)(2) of the Social Security 
Act, as amended. The SPRANS Community-based Abstinence Education 
Program includes Community-based Abstinence Education grants, 
Abstinence Education Special Congressional Initiative Project grants, 
and the Abstinence Education Technical Assistance contract with the 
National Abstinence Clearinghouse. This delegation permits the 
Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, to 
administer FY 2002, 2003 and FY 2004 SPRANS abstinence education grants 
under the terms and conditions of the initial awards, thereby allowing 
the continuation of the existing grants consistent with recent 
appropriations enactments (Pub. L. 108-477).
    This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's policy on 
regulations and the existing delegation of authority to approve and 
issue regulations. This delegation excludes the authority to issue 
reports to Congress, to take final action to withhold funds from States 
and to act under the nondiscrimination provisions of the Social 
Security Act.
    This delegation also supersedes all prior delegations of authority 
to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this 
delegation.
    I hereby ratify any actions taken by the Commission, Administration 
on Children Youth and Families, or any other Administration on 
Children, Youth and Families official, which, in effect, involved the 
exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation is effective on the date of signature.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Wade. F. Horn,
Assistant Secretary for Children & Families.
[FR Doc. 05-21162 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Thomas A. Reilly, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*Reilly*v. *City of New York,*170 App. Div. 754, affirmed.

(Submitted October 29, 1918,

decided November 12, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment entered January 13, 1916, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The action was brought to recover money alleged to be due under a city contract for alterations and improvements to a sewer. The defense was that in the conduct of the work an explosion occurred causing damage to property and to several persons; that defendant to protect itself from liability held up payment of an outstanding certificate. Whereupon plaintiff, claiming that the city had defaulted and broken its contract by failure to make the payment, suspended work and refused to complete his contract.

*684
      *Woolsey. A. Shepard*for appellant.

*William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel {Terence' Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rancher Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
&
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, John Works,
      Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                John WorksName:
            John
                WorksTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer & Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            August
                21, 2006
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 4    
  



	Common Stock

Number	 	 	 	Common Stock

Shares
	

  


	
 	

Community Valley Bancorp

  

Incorporated under the laws of the State of California	
 	

    

	 	 	 	 	See Reverse for Certain Definitions
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

CUSIP            





This
certifies that: 


is
the record holder of: 


shares
of no par value common stock of

Community Valley Bancorp 


hereinafter
designated the "Company", transferable on the share register of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or assigned. By
the acceptance of this Certificate, the holder hereof assents to and agrees to be bound by all of the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto. 



        Witness
the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 


        Dated: 



	 	 	James S. Rickards

Secretary	 	Community Valley Bancorp

  

Incorporated

July 16, 2001

California	 	Keith C. Robbins

President and Chief

Executive Officer




1





 

        The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 



	TEN COM	 	—as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT—                    Custodian                 
   
	 	 	 	 	(Cust)                        (Minor)
        
	TEN ENT	 	—as tenants by the entireties	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act                                
	 	 	 	 	(State)                        
	JT TEN	 	—as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	 




Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 


For
valued received,                          hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 



	Please insert social security or other

identifying number of assignee	 	 
	

	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

 
	
 (Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address, Including Zip Code, of Assignee)
	

 	
 	

 
	

	

 	
 	

 
	

	

 	
 	

 
	






shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                         
        Attorney to transfer said stock on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 



	Dated	 	    
	 	 	 	 
	

 	
 	

 	
 	


	 	 	 	 	Notice:	 	The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.
	

Signature(s) Guaranteed	
 	

 	
 	

 





	By	    
	 	 
	The signature(s) should be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (banks, stockbrokers, savings and loan association and credit unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion
program) pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.	 	 




2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael P. ODonnellMichael P. ODonnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


May 8, 2008
[No. 24036.

Department One.

November 17, 1932.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eeli Siviia, *Appellant.*
      *1*

*A. P. Wilson,*for appellant.

*Cecil C. Halim*and *J. E. Stone,*for respondent.

Reported in 15 P. (2d) 1113.

Mitchell, J.

— Eeli Siviia was convicted of violations of the state prohibition law, and at the same time, by a special verdict, was found to have been formerly convicted of violations of the same law. He has appealed from the judgment and sentence on the verdicts.

In the trial of the case, he was present and also represented by counsel. At the conclusion of the evidence, the written instructions to the jury, satisfactory to both sides, were prepared and signed by the trial judge. With the consent of the state and the appellant, the judge then told the jury that the attorneys by stipulation had agreed it would not be necessary for the court to read the instructions to the jury; that written instructions had been prepared, and that the jury would take them to the jury room for their consideration. Counsel on both sides waived argu*199ments to the jury. The jury took the written instructions to the jury room to be used in their deliberations.

The sole assignment of error on the appeal is that the court should not have submitted the case to the jury “without having first read his written instructions to the jury.” Stated in another way, the question is: Was the appellant bound by his waiver in open court of the provision of Rem. Comp. Stat., § 339, and Rule of Practice IV, Rem. 1927 Sup., § 308-4, that the written charge of the court shall be read to the jury. The argument is that the statute is mandatory, and that its provisions cannot be waived.

The same kind of argument was made in the case of *State v. Andrews,*71 Wash. 181, 127 Pac. 1102, where, upon stipulation, instructions were given orally rather than in writing, as provided by statute, and it was held (quoting the syllabus):

> “A defendant in a felony case may waive the statutory requirement that the instructions to the jury be given in writing. ’ ’

Upon principle and the authority of that case, it must be held there was no error in this case in giving effect to appellant’s consent that the written instructions might be taken by the jury without being read to them by the court.

Affirmed.

Tolman, C. J., Holcomb, Parker, and Herman, JJ., concur.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 28, 2015

No. 04-14-00412-CR

Robert MARTINEZ, JR.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6698

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On April 23, 2015, appellant filed a pro se letter asking this court to take judicial notice 

of a pending case in trial cause number 307125 and other matters, and asking for information 

regarding the status of his appeal before this court.

The request that this court take judicial notice is DENIED. The status of appellant’s 

appeal in the above appellate cause number is as follows. On August 6, 2014, this court issued 

an opinion dismissing appellant’s appeal. On September 4, 2014, this court denied appellant’s 

motion for rehearing. Despite extensions of time from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 

which to file a petition for discretionary review, appellant did not file such a petition. This 

court’s mandate issued on March 2, 2015.

It is so ORDERED on the 28th day of, April 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,922-02

EX PARTE MARCUS DEWAYNE JOSHUA , Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 21-0005CR IN THE 87TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM LEON COUNTY

Per curiam. SLAUGHTER, J. filed a concurring opinion.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because counsel failed to timely

file a notice of appeal. Based on the record, the trial court has found that counsel failed to timely file

a notice of appeal.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State,

98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction

in cause number 21-0005CR from the 87th District Court of Leon County.
2

It appears that Applicant is represented bycounsel. If Applicant is not represented bycounsel,

then within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Should Applicant decide to appeal, he must

file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s

mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: October 25, 2023

Do not publish
* Judge Wilkins did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7639
WILLIE FOSTER SELLERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH E. MELSON, 1st Assistant United States Attorney; BARBARA WALKER, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff; MARK MUSTIN, Chief Deputy; G. F. DRISCOLL, Deputy Librarian, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-01-545-2) Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Willie Foster Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Willie Foster Sellers appeals the district court’s orders denying him relief in his action alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) a nd Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sellers v. Melson , No. CA-01-545-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2001; Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED