alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Iris Oifigiúil C 280A/9 Lú

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 280A |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 669 Lúnasa 2023 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 280A

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

669 Lúnasa 2023

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | An Oifig Eorpach um Roghnú Foirne (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Fógra lena leasaítear an fógra comórtais oscailte — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Riarthóirí (AD 6) sna réimsí seo a leanas: 1. Micreacnamaíocht/maicreacnamaíocht 2. Eacnamaíocht airgeadais 3. Eacnamaíocht thionsclaíoch ( IO C 220 A, 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Oifig Eorpach um Roghnú Foirne (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Fógra lena leasaítear an fógra comórtais oscailte — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Riarthóirí (AD 6) sna réimsí seo a leanas: 1. Micreacnamaíocht/maicreacnamaíocht 2. Eacnamaíocht airgeadais 3. Eacnamaíocht thionsclaíoch ( IO C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

( IO C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Oifig Eorpach um Roghnú Foirne (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CA 280/1

---

Fógra lena leasaítear an fógra comórtais oscailte — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Riarthóirí (AD 6) sna réimsí seo a leanas: 1. Micreacnamaíocht/maicreacnamaíocht 2. Eacnamaíocht airgeadais 3. Eacnamaíocht thionsclaíoch

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 220 A an 22 Meitheamh 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Ar leathanach 1:

| in ionad: | ‘An sprioc-am le hiarratas a dhéanamh: an 25 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile’, |
| --- | --- |

in ionad:

‘An sprioc-am le hiarratas a dhéanamh: an 25 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile’,

| léitear: | ‘An sprioc-am le hiarratas a dhéanamh: an 26 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile’. |
| --- | --- |

léitear:

léitear

‘An sprioc-am le hiarratas a dhéanamh: an 26 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile’.

Ar leathanach 5:

| in ionad: | ‘Ní mór d’iarrthóirí iarratas a dhéanamh ar líne ar
  shuíomh gréasáin EPSO (2)
  faoin 25 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.’, |
| --- | --- |

in ionad:

in ionad:

‘Ní mór d’iarrthóirí iarratas a dhéanamh ar líne ar
  shuíomh gréasáin EPSO (2)
  faoin 25 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.’,

| léitear: | ‘Ní mór d’iarrthóirí iarratas a dhéanamh ar líne ar
  shuíomh gréasáin EPSO (2) faoin 26 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.’. |
| --- | --- |

léitear:

léitear

‘Ní mór d’iarrthóirí iarratas a dhéanamh ar líne ar
  shuíomh gréasáin EPSO (2) faoin 26 Iúil 2023 ar 12:00 (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.’.

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/ga/job-opportunities/open-for-application

2

---
#### MARION R. McCANN, Appellant, v. ROSE S. PAUL, Respondent.

No. 7209

March 26, 1974

520 P.2d 610

*103OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Marion McCann, purchaser, appeals from a judgment denying him specific performance of a contract made with Rose Paul, seller, for the purchase of unimproved real property. He had paid $250 for an option to purchase the property, exercised that option, and paid an additional $500 when escrow was opened. However, he failed to tender the balance of the purchase price, $6,250 when it was due. He did tender the balance twenty-nine days later. It is his contention that the district court should have granted him equitable relief since his late tender of payment did not prejudice the seller.

Specific performance may be granted a defaulting purchaser who later tenders performance without unreasonable delay, if circumstances have not intervened to make it inequitable to give such relief. Slobe v. Kirby Stone, Inc., 84 Nev. 700, 447 P.2d 491 (1968); Moore v. Prindle, 80 Nev. 369, 394 P.2d 352 (1964). Of course, the decision to either grant or refuse specific performance is addressed to the sound discretion of *104the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown. In those instances where equitable relief is granted to the purchaser, we normally find that he has paid a considerable portion of the purchase price, or has entered upon the property and enhanced its value by the placing of improvements thereon, or some other similar circumstance that would constitute a forfeiture of substance, if such relief were not given. Slobe v. Kirby Stone, Inc., supra; Moore v. Prindle, supra; Mosso v. Lee, et al., 53 Nev. 176, 295 P. 776 (1931); Canepa v. Durham, 62 Nev. 417, 153 P.2d 899 (1944). Such circumstances do not appear in the record before us, and we are, therefore, unable to rule that the district court abused its discretion in denying equitable relief to the defaulting purchaser.

Affirmed.
<Page>


                                                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
(and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
Registration Statement File No. 333-76425 for Hartford Life and Annuity
Insurance Company Separate Account Seven on Form N-4.


Hartford, Connecticut                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

April 8, 2002
# Euroopa Liidu C 280A/9. a

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 280A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 66. aastakäik9. august 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 280A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

66. aastakäik9. august 2023

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Personalivaliku Amet (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Teade, millega muudetakse teadet avaliku konkursi korraldamise kohta – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administraatorid (AD 6) järgmistes valdkondades: 1. mikromajandus/makromajandus, 2. finantsmajandus, 3. tööstusökonoomika ( ELT C 220 A, 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Personalivaliku Amet (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Teade, millega muudetakse teadet avaliku konkursi korraldamise kohta – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administraatorid (AD 6) järgmistes valdkondades: 1. mikromajandus/makromajandus, 2. finantsmajandus, 3. tööstusökonoomika ( ELT C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

( ELT C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Personalivaliku Amet (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 280/1

---

Teade, millega muudetakse teadet avaliku konkursi korraldamise kohta – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administraatorid (AD 6) järgmistes valdkondades: 1. mikromajandus/makromajandus, 2. finantsmajandus, 3. tööstusökonoomika

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 220 A, 22. juuni 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Leheküljel 1

| asendatakse | „Kandideerimisavalduste esitamise lõppkuupäev: 25. juuli 2023 kell 12.00 Brüsseli aja järgi“ |
| --- | --- |

asendatakse

„Kandideerimisavalduste esitamise lõppkuupäev: 25. juuli 2023 kell 12.00 Brüsseli aja järgi“

| järgmisega: | „Kandideerimisavalduste esitamise lõppkuupäev: 26. juuli 2023 kell 12.00 Brüsseli aja järgi“. |
| --- | --- |

järgmisega:

järgmisega

„Kandideerimisavalduste esitamise lõppkuupäev: 26. juuli 2023 kell 12.00 Brüsseli aja järgi“.

Leheküljel 5

| asendatakse | „Kandideerimisavaldus tuleb esitada elektrooniliselt
  EPSO veebisaidil (2)
  hiljemalt 25. juulil 2023 kella 12.00ks Brüsseli aja järgi.“ |
| --- | --- |

asendatakse

asendatakse

„Kandideerimisavaldus tuleb esitada elektrooniliselt
  EPSO veebisaidil (2)
  hiljemalt 25. juulil 2023 kella 12.00ks Brüsseli aja järgi.“

| järgmisega: | „Kandideerimisavaldus tuleb esitada elektrooniliselt
  EPSO veebisaidil (2) hiljemalt 26. juulil 2023 kella 12.00ks Brüsseli aja järgi.“ |
| --- | --- |

järgmisega:

järgmisega

„Kandideerimisavaldus tuleb esitada elektrooniliselt
  EPSO veebisaidil (2) hiljemalt 26. juulil 2023 kella 12.00ks Brüsseli aja järgi.“

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/et/job-opportunities/open-for-application

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) by OptimumBank
Holdings, Inc. (the Company), I, Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                         
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Albert J. Finch                     
|                   |  |     |  | Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive Officer
#### WILLIAM F. CLEGHORN, Appellant, v. JONATHON P. GOLDSMITH and WACKENHUT SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Respondents.

No. 7636

March 17, 1975

532 P.2d 609

*Johns & Johns,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Beckley, Singleton, DeLanoy & Jemison,*of Las Vegas, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

William Cleghorn was a ten-year employee of Wackenhut Services, Inc., a subcontractor for the Atomic Energy Commission. While working at his duties as Security Inspector he *161was fired for striking a fellow employee with his pistol during an altercation. A hearing before a grievance arbitrator provided by the existing union contract resulted in his reinstatement. However, he was denied permission to carry a firearm until and unless he took and passed a psychiatric examination. Eventually he was fully reinstated after the evaluation but he brought this lawsuit alleging that the respondents through their agents and employees conspired to terminate his employment, impair his professional reputation and generally defame him.

The trial court granted an NRCP 12(b) motion to dismiss on the ground that Wackenhut Services, Inc., as an agency or contractor of the federal government functioning in security areas was immune from prosecution. Cleghorn appeals.

The employer company’s representatives had good and sufficient reason to be apprehensive of Cleghom’s emotional stability. The fight with the co-employee was one of a series of incidents in his background that caused the employer to look with askance at his continued employment in the sensitive area at the Nevada Test Site. Correspondence exchanged between the company and the representatives of the Atomic Energy Commission operation concerning him was consistent with their proper concern over security.

Absolute immunity exists in an organization that is contracted to provide security services for the government, the same as afforded the government itself. The trial court founded its order of dismissal upon Becker v. Philco Corporation, 372 F.2d 771 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 979 (1967), and we agree.

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137083 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



## v SC: 137083 COA: 276296 Berrien CC: 2006-402244-FC GARY WAYNE STUDER, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of The Small Business Company (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stuart
      Schreiber, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Stuart Schreiber


Stuart
      Schreiber


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer




November
      20, 2006
No. 75-1530.

#### Horan *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61980-61981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the second meeting of the NIH Public 
Access Working Group under the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) 
Board of Regents.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.
    The mission of the NIH Public Access Working Group is to advise the 
NLM Board of Regents on implementation of the new NIH Public Access 
Policy. This policy responds to strong Congressional interest in 
improving the public's access to the published results of NIH-funded 
research. Under the policy, NIH-supported investigators are encouraged 
to submit manuscripts electronically to the National Library of 
Medicine's PubMed Central (PMC). The PMC is the NIH digital repository 
of full-text, peer-reviewed biomedical, behavioral, and clinical 
research journals. The policy included the establishment of this 
working group with representation from a broad range of interested 
stakeholders. The Working Group will: (1) Review statistical evidence 
on the impact of the policy, e.g., number of manuscripts submitted, 
summary data on embargo periods, connections to other NIH information 
resources, level of use, etc.; (2) provide suggestions for improving 
the implementation of the manuscript submission system and procedures; 
(3) assess the extent to which the policy is achieving its stated 
goals; and (4) suggest any changes to the policy that might further 
these goals.

    Name of Committee: NIH Public Access Working Group.
    Date: November 15, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: NIH Public Access Policy Research and Discussion.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 
2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.
    Contact Person: Donald A.B. Lindberg, M.D., Director, National 
Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Building 38, 
Room 2E17, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-496-6221.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The comments should include the name, address, 
telephone number and,

[[Page 61981]]

when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the 
interested person.

    Dated: October 18, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21413 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

US Pan American Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 63362, 63363

)

Under Contract No. N64498

- 21

- P

- 5507 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Jorge DelPino

Vice President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Paul Scheck, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The disputes have been settled. By Order dated October 13, 2022, the Board

informed the parties that it intended to dismiss these appeals unless either party objected

within 14 days of the date of the Order. The Board received no objection from either

party. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: November 15 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63362, 63363

, Appeals of US Pan

American Solutions, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 15, 2022 RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




1.
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Michael D. WeaverMichael
      D. WeaverChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      8, 2009
Exhibit 23.1
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  
  Implant Sciences Corporation
 Wilmington, Massachusetts
 
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (No.’s 333-109677, 333-111434, 333-117366, 333-124058, 333-127167, 333-129911) and Forms S-8 (No.’s 333-42816, 333-111117, 333-138292, 333-144892) of our report dated October 9, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements
which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Implant Sciences Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2009.
 
  
 
 /s/ UHY LLP
 Boston, Massachusetts
 October 9, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.115


 


[LOGO OF TEIJIN LIMITED]


 


1-I, UCHISAIWAI-CHO 2-CHOME,


CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO


100-8585 JAPAN


March 28, 2002


Southwall Technologies Inc.


 


1029 Corporation Way


 


Palo Alto, CA 94303


 


	
  ATTN:

  	
  Thomas G.
  Hood

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  President
  and Chief Executive Officer

  



 


Dear Mr. Hood:


 


This letter is
written with reference to the Guarantee Agreement dated as of May 6, 1997,
between Southwall Technologies, Inc. (“STI”) and Teijin Limited (“Teijin”) as
amended in August 1999 by Memorandum between STI and Teijin (such Guarantee, as
amended, the “Guarantee Agreement”).


 


By STI E-mail
dated Feb 11, 2002, STI advised Teijin that, as of December 31, 2001, it was
not compliance with the Minimum Quick Ratio, Tangible Net Worth Amount and
Maximum Debt/Tangible Net Worth of the financial covenants in Article 4 - (1)
of the Guarantee Agreement and requested that Teijin waive STI’s non-compliance
with such covenants through December 31, 2002 (with respect to non-compliance
as of the end of December, 2002).


 


Subject to the
conditions set forth below, this will confirm that Teijin hereby waives any
defaults under Article 5.1 of the Guarantee Agreement that may exist through
and including December 31, 2002 (end of the fiscal year 2002) arising out of
STI’s failure to comply with the financial covenants of the Minimum Quick
Ratio, Tangible Net Worth Amount and Maximum Debt/Tangible Net Worth in Article
4 - (1) of the Guarantee Agreement.


 


This waiver
does not apply to any period after December 31, 2002.  Nevertheless, in the event that any one or more of STI’s
covenants are in default as of December 31, 2002, Teijin agrees that it will
not assert its rights or take any action with respect to such default until on
or after March 1, 2003, after which date Teijin shall be free to take action with
respect to such default.  This waiver is
solely and exclusively for the purpose of the Guarantee Agreement and without
prejudice to any other rights that Teijin has or may have against the Company.


 


In addition,
this waiver is conditioned on STI’s agreement that, 1) in the event that it
issues new capital to third parties in a public offering of its equity
securities, STI shall apply $2.5 million of the proceeds of the offering to the
prepayment of the 2004 installments of the Sanwa loan, and 2) in the event that
it issues new capital to third parties in one or more transactions other than a
secondary offering, STI shall apply 10% of the aggregate proceeds of such
offerings to the prepayment of the 2004 installments of the Sanwa.


 


	
  Very truly
  yours,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Teijin
  Limited

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ 

  	
  Yukio
  Kobayashi

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By 

  	
  Yukio
  Kobayashi

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Assistant to
  General Manager

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Films
  Business Group