alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66285-66286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21556]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2692; MB Docket No. 04-218; RM-10987, RM-11237]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cimarron, Las Vegas and Pecos, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 69 FR 35561 
(June 25, 2004) this Report and Order reallots Channel 264C3, Station 
KLVF(FM) (``KLVF''), Las Vegas, New Mexico, to Pecos, New Mexico, and 
modifies Station KLVF's license accordingly. The coordinates for 
Channel 264C3 at Pecos, New Mexico, are 35-40-48 NL and 105-32-26 WL, 
with a site restriction of 16.9 kilometers (10.5 miles) northeast of 
Pecos. The Report and Order also allots Channel 296A to Las Vegas, New 
Mexico, at coordinates of 35-36-33 NL and 105-09-31 WL, with a site 
restriction of 5.4 kilometers (3.3 miles) east of Las Vegas, New 
Mexico.

DATES: Effective November 28, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-218, adopted October 12, 2005, and 
released October 14, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-

[[Page 66286]]

800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy 
of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the 
Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review 
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 73 is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for Part 73 reads as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New Mexico, is 
amended by removing Channel 264C3 and adding Channel 296A at Las Vegas; 
and by adding Channel 264C3 at Pecos.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21556 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his/her capacity as an officer of Diatect International Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1.

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and/or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and



2.

the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  April 14, 2004

By:

/s/ Jay W. Downs________

Name:

Jay W. Downs,

Title:

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer (Chief
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Úřední věstník C 310/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 310 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 661. září2023 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 310

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 661. září2023

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2023/C 310/01 | Směnné kurzy vůči euru – 31. srpna 2023 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2023/C 310/01

Směnné kurzy vůči euru – 31. srpna 2023

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 1.9.2023 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 310/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2023

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 310/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

31. srpna 2023

(2023/C 310/01)

1 euro =

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,0868 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 158,49 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4523 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,85718 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 11,8430 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 0,9584 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 142,30 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 11,5800 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 24,072 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 380,13 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,4673 |
| RON | rumunský lei | 4,9420 |
| TRY | turecká lira | 28,9848 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,6785 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,4721 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 8,5250 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,8259 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 1,4686 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 439,56 |
| ZAR | jihoafrický rand | 20,4199 |
| CNY | čínský juan | 7,9196 |
| IDR | indonéská rupie | 16 551,96 |
| MYR | malajsijský ringgit | 5,0428 |
| PHP | filipínské peso | 61,545 |
| RUB | ruský rubl | |
| THB | thajský baht | 38,005 |
| BRL | brazilský real | 5,3082 |
| MXN | mexické peso | 18,1866 |
| INR | indická rupie | 89,9293 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,0868

JPY

japonský jen

158,49

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4523

GBP

britská libra

0,85718

SEK

švédská koruna

11,8430

CHF

švýcarský frank

0,9584

ISK

islandská koruna

142,30

NOK

norská koruna

11,5800

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

česká koruna

24,072

HUF

maďarský forint

380,13

PLN

polský zlotý

4,4673

RON

rumunský lei

4,9420

TRY

turecká lira

28,9848

AUD

australský dolar

1,6785

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,4721

HKD

hongkongský dolar

8,5250

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,8259

SGD

singapurský dolar

1,4686

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 439,56

ZAR

jihoafrický rand

20,4199

CNY

čínský juan

7,9196

IDR

indonéská rupie

16 551,96

MYR

malajsijský ringgit

5,0428

PHP

filipínské peso

61,545

RUB

ruský rubl

THB

thajský baht

38,005

BRL

brazilský real

5,3082

MXN

mexické peso

18,1866

INR

indická rupie

89,9293

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2119

___________________________

Penny L. Barton

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: January 6, 2015

Filed: January 14, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Penny L. Barton appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of 1

disability insurance benefits. For reversal, Barton argues that the administrative law

judge (ALJ) erred (1) in assessing her residual functional capacity, and in failing to

assign appropriate weight to the findings of her treating and examining physicians

and other medical sources; (2) in finding that she was capable of performing her past

relevant work, and other work identified by a vocational expert; and (3) in failing to

consider all of the evidence in the record, including the observations of and

information provided by third parties. Following a careful and thorough review of

the record, we conclude that the ALJ’s determination is supported by substantial

evidence on the record as a whole, that Barton’s arguments do not support reversal,

and that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for

1

the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition

by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with 
the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a Non-
Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.
    Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicant: Full Package Logistics Inc., 
1890 NW 82nd Avenue, Suite 101, Miami, FL 33126. Officers: Manuel A. 
Lescano, President (Qualifying Individual), Leopoldo del Calvo, Sr., 
Vice President.

    Dated: January 28, 2005.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-2147 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 232
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

                           December 16, 2009

              Reported by Mrs. Lincoln, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACTUAL 
              ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Termination Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned by the 
Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated contractual 
arrangements with the Village.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the termination of an 
easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), 
the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory 
arrangements with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 
Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 232

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 511

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00011

- CR

Jose Ernesto Chavez Jr. v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 04

- 7626

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be D ISMISSED

. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 16, 2023
#### THOMAS A. CAMPBELL, Appellant, *v.*ROBERT T. BASKIN and ROSE BASKIN, Respondents.

No. 3665

September 18, 1951.

235 P.2d 729.

*Morse & Graves,*of Las Vegas, and *Forrest A. Betts,*of Los Angeles, Calif., for Appellant.

*Cornwall*and *Compton,*of Las Vegas, and *Allan K. Perry,*of Phoenix, Ariz., for Respondents.

*470Order Granting Motion to Strike Affidavit

*Per Curiam:*

Attached to the opening brief of appellant in this matter is an affidavit of one of appellant’s counsel relative to proceedings in court at the time motion for new trial was made. Respondent has moved for the order of this court striking said affidavit from said opening brief upon the ground that it is not a part of the bill of exceptions or judgment roll and is accordingly a fugitive document.

It is clear that this court in determining whether error was committed by the trial court must confine its considerations to such error as may appear from the record.

It is clear that the attaching of documents to briefs is not a proper method of supplying any deficiencies in the record and that such documents cannot be regarded as forming any part of the record which this court may properly consider.

The motion must be granted and the affidavit stricken. It is so ordered.
#### ROY HOLT, Appellant, v. PHILIP SINCLAIR, Respondent.

No. 7091

February 26, 1975

532 P.2d 271

*Harley W. Carter,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Lee and Beasey,*of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

*109OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Phillip Sinclair, a judgment debtor, persuaded the district court to grant a preliminary injunction against an execution sale of parcels of his real property by Roy Holt, his judgment creditor. Consequently, Holt has appealed to this court for relief. Since we are unable to perceive a valid basis for injunc-tive relief, we reverse.

Some preliminary observations are in order. Sinclair does not claim that the judgment debt, for some legal reason, is not owing Holt. Indeed, that debt previously has been confirmed by this court. Sinclair v. Holt, 88 Nev. 97, 493 P.2d 1316 (1972). Neither does he point to any infirmity in proceedings leading to the proposed execution sale. Moreover, the record suggests his ability to pay the judgment debt should he elect to do so and thus preclude the execution sale of property.

The district court apparently was impelled to grant injunc-tive relief because of circumstances attending an attempted settlement of the debt. Two parcels of Sinclair’s property already had been sold in an effort to satisfy the judgment. Since that sale did not produce enough to satisfy the debt, the attorneys for Sinclair and Holt entered upon settlement negotiations and, through correspondence, had reached a compromise understanding which contemplated the delivery by Sinclair of a check for a designated sum in return for a satisfaction of judgment and a redemption of the two parcels sold. However, the time for redemption expired before settlement was concluded,1 and Holt then endeavored to execute on other parcels, but was stopped by the court below.

Sinclair is indebted to Holt. He must pay that judgment, or suffer execution upon his property to an extent sufficient to satisfy the debt. He has asserted no cognizable basis for *110equitable relief. Whatever claim for damages may be his resulting from the prior execution sale will be resolved in another case to which we have made reference in footnote 1.

Reversed and remanded for disposition in accordance with this opinion.

Gunderson, C. J., and Batjer, Zenoff, and Mowbray, JJ., concur.

1

t is claimed that Holt’s then counsel misled Sinclair’s counsel as to the date of the prior execution sale causing Sinclair and his counsel to allow the redemption period to pass. Because of that claim and others, Sinclair commenced an action at law against Holt, and others, to recover damages, if any, resulting from that prior sale. We presume that such action will afford to Sinclair all appropriate legal relief, if any, to which he may be entitled and is an adequate remedy. Cf. Connery v. Swift, 9 Nev. 39, 43 (1873).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5126 

To repeal provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

relating to health savings accounts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. FLEMING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act relating to health savings accounts, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Save Ameri5 cans’ Health Care Choices Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5126 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ADDITIONAL TAX FROM DISTRIBUTIONS 

2 FROM HSAS AND MSAS. 

3 Section 9004 of the Patient Protection and Afford4 able Care Act is hereby repealed, and effective as of the 

5 date of the enactment of such Act the provisions of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 amended by such section 

7 are amended to read as such provisions would read if such 

8 section had never been enacted. 

9 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTIONS MAKING 

10 NON-PRESCRIPTION DRUGS NON-QUALI11 FYING DISTRIBUTIONS FROM TAX-PRE12 FERRED ACCOUNTS. 

13 Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Afford14 able Care Act is hereby repealed, and effective as of the 

15 date of the enactment of such Act the provisions of the 

16 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 amended by such section 

17 are amended to read as such provisions would read if such 

18 section had never been enacted. 

19 SEC. 4. TREATMENT OF HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLANS 

20 AS QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN UNDER THE PA21 TIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE 

22 ACT. 

23 Subparagraph (B) of section 1301(a)(1) of the Pa24 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by 

25 inserting ‘‘or meets the requirements for a high deductible 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5126 IH

1 health plan under section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986’’ after ‘‘section 1302(a)’’. 

3 SEC. 5. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON HEALTH FLEXIBLE 

4 SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER CAFE5 TERIA PLANS. 

6 Sections 9005 and 10902 of the Patient Protection 

7 and Affordable Care Act are hereby repealed, and effective 

8 as of the date of the enactment of such Act the provisions 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 amended by such 

10 sections are amended to read as such provisions would 

11 read if such sections had never been enacted. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDDIE RAY PIERCE

No. 759SC680

(Filed 3 December 1975)

Criminal Law § 148— plea of guilty or nolo contendere — no appeal

There is no right of appeal from a plea of guilty or *nolo con-tendere.*G.S. 15-180.2.

Appeal by defendant Eddie Ray Pierce from *Clark (Giles R.), Judge.*Judgment entered 14 May 1975 in Superior Court, *677Person County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 19 November 1975.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Associate Attorney Elisha H. Bunting, Jr., for the State.*

*Ramsey, Jackson, Hubbard & Galloway by Charles E. Hubbard and Mark Galloway for defendant appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant purports to appeal from a judgment entered on his plea of guilty to the 5 February 1975 armed robbery of Roland Dickerson. There is no right of appeal from a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. G.S. 15-180.2; *State v. Carr,*27 N.C. App. 39, 217 S.E. 2d 714 (1975).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.