alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,865
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,896
<PP&E>                                         142,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 528,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,611
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,373)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,590
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRIAN KEITH STURGEON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-98-402, CA-01-16-3) Submitted: February 28, 2002 Decided: March 15, 2002 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Brian Keith Sturgeon, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Brian Keith Sturgeon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sturgeon , Nos. CR-98-402; CA-01-16-3 (E.D. Va. July 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.8

PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR INTEREST ACCRUED ON OUTSTANDING DEBT, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of
900-1281 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7,
promises to pay to or to the order of Bayshore Trading LTD., LTD. U.S., ("the
Payee") of Shirley House, 50 Shirley Street, P.O. Box N-8426, Nassau, Bahamas
the sum of  SEVENTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT UNITED STATES
DOLLARS and THIRTY CENTS ($73,958.30) being due and payable ON DEMAND BY
BAYSHORE TRADING LTD., LTD U.S. IN WRITING.

CYPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY WAY OF WRITEN
RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and -payable under the laws of the Common Wealth of the Bahamas.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day of June 2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation



<PAGE>
PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CyPost Corporation, ("the Payer") of 900-1281 West Georgia
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 3J7, promises to pay to or to
the order of Kelly Shane Montalban, ("the Payee") of P.O. Box 700, Lions Bay,
British Columbia, Canada the sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED TWO THOUSAND FOUR
HUNDRED NINETY SIX UNITED STATES DOLLARS and THIRTY CENTS ($1,302,496.30) with
eight percent (8%) interest thereon, the sum total principal and interest being
due and payable ON DEMAND BY KELLY SHANE MONTALBAN IN WRITING.

CYPOST CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY WAY OF WRITEN
RESOLUTION HAS APPROVED THIS NOTE.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payer and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive
presentment for payment, notices or formalities to which they might be entitled
and do hereby agree to pay all costs and expenses (including all legal costs)
paid or incurred in collecting the monies owed hereunder after the same shall
become due and payable under the laws of the Province of British Columbia,
Canada.
Dated at Vancouver, B.C. this 19th day 0f June 2001.

CyPost Corporation

/s/ Robert Sendoh
-----------------
Robert Sendoh
Chairman of the Board
CyPost Corporation


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 66332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2699; MB Docket No. 04-350; RM-10815]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Oroville, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition filed by Linda A. Davidson, 
requesting the allotment of Channel 272A at Oroville, California, as 
its second local service. See 69 FR 55547, published September 15, 
2004. This document also dismisses the counterproposal filed by Deer 
Creek Broadcasting, LLC, proposing the allotment of Channel 272A at 
Quincy, California, as its sixth local service.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MB Docket No. 04-350, adopted October 12, 2005, and released 
October 14, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from 
the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20054, telephone 1-
800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. This document is not subject to 
the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not 
required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the 
proposed rule was dismissed.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21552 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 372



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV No. CR-14-771

JEFFERY DALE HARDY APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE O PINION D ELIVERED J UNE 17, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2009-1000] HONORABLE RANDY F. PHILHOURS, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge Jeffery Hardy pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, a Class C felony, and was sentenced to two years of probation on March 22, 2010. The State filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probation on March 9, 2012, and his probation was subsequently revoked after the circuit court found that he had violated the conditions of his probation by failing to pay fines, costs, and fees as directed. 1 On appeal, Hardy’s counsel argues that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and asks to withdraw as counsel. The clerk of this court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to Hardy in accordance with Rule 4-3(k)(2) (2014) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Hardy has not filed any

1 The sentencing order was filed on May 28, 2014, after the hearing on the State’s petition was rescheduled multiple times for reasons unexplained in the record.Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 372

pro se points. Because counsel has complied with the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm. The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Gaines v. State , 2014 Ark. App. 651. Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Hardy’s appeal is wholly without merit. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirming the circuit court’s revocation. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. V IRDEN and B ROWN , JJ., agree. Shaun Hair, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant. No response.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

---



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 31, 2011 |  |                                             
|                      |  | Daniel B.
 OBrien                          
|                      |  | Principal
 Executive and Principal Financial
|                      |  | Officer                                     

---
#### RAC Corporation *v.*Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al.

*Joseph R. Mirrione,*in support of the petition.

*Stuart A. Margolis,*in opposition.

Decided June 4, 1993

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 901 (AC 11280), is denied.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES WILLIAM WOODRING — and — STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THURMAN WOODRING

No. 7130SC144

(Filed 28 April *1971)*

Appeal by defendants from *Snepp, Superior Court Judge,*October 1970 Session of Superior Court held in Jackson County.

The defendants were tried upon a bill of indictment, proper *213in form, charging them with the felonies of breaking and entering and larceny.

Prom the judgment of imprisonment as youthful offenders after a plea of guilty, the defendants appealed.

*Attorney General Morgan and Assistant Attorney General Rich for the State.*

*Thomas W. Jones for defendant appellants.*

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Upon competent evidence the trial judge found that the plea of guilty of each defendant was freely, understanding^ and voluntarily made.

Court-appointed counsel, with commendable frankness, states that he is unable to find error in the trial. The Attorney General states that he finds no error entitling the defendants to a new trial. We have examined and considered the record, and we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Parker and Vaughn concur.
#### Nedra Wynn *v.*Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14788.

*David C. Pite,*in support of the petition.

*Frederick L. Murolo,*in opposition.

Decided June 4, 1993

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes § 52-410?

*“2.*Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff’s application to compel arbitration?”
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 PlanetOut Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands, except ratios)
 Nine monthsYear ended December 31,
    
    
    ended2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    September 30, 2006(Unaudited)Net income (loss)
from
operations as
reported
    
    $
    (15,644
    )
    
    $
    (7,807
    )
    
    $
    (423
    )
    
    $
    449
    
    
    $
    2,043
    
    
    $
    (1,655
    )Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    836
    
    
    
    112
    
    
    
    193
    
    
    
    1,713
    
    
    
    238
    
    
    
    616Earnings as defined
    
    $
    (14,808
    )
    
    $
    (7,695
    )
    
    $
    (230
    )
    
    $
    2,162
    
    
    $
    2,281
    
    
    $
    (1,039
    )Fixed charges
    
    $
    836
    
    
    $
    112
    
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    1,713
    
    
    $
    238
    
    
    $
    616Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.3 x
    
    
    
    9.6 x
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing
income (loss) from operations plus fixed charges by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization
of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments under
operating leases that we believe to be representative of
interest. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges in
2001 through 2003 and for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 by amounts equal to the net loss for the period.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5179 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5179

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that family 
 coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program remains 
  available with respect to an otherwise eligible child of a Federal 
employee or annuitant until that child attains 26 years of age, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2010

 Mrs. Dahlkemper introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that family 
 coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program remains 
  available with respect to an otherwise eligible child of a Federal 
employee or annuitant until that child attains 26 years of age, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT COVERAGE UNDER FEHBP.

    (a) Provisions Relating to Age.--Chapter 89 of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 8901(5)--
                    (A) in the matter before subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``22 years of age'' and inserting ``26 years 
                of age''; and
                    (B) in the matter after subparagraph (B), by 
                striking ``age 22'' and inserting ``age 26''; and
            (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``22 years of age'' 
                and inserting ``26 years of age''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``age 22'' and 
                inserting ``age 26''.
    (b) Provisions Relating to Marital Status.--Chapter 89 of title 5, 
United States Code, is further amended--
            (1) in section 8901(5) and subsections (b)(2)(A), 
        (c)(2)(B), (e)(1)(B), and (e)(2)(A) of section 8905a, by 
        striking ``an unmarried dependent'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``a dependent''; and
            (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B), by striking ``unmarried 
        dependent'' and inserting ``dependent''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
become effective on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

CubicEnergy, Inc.

 

Wehereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB filing of our report dated September 26,2007, relating to the balance sheet of Cubic Energy, Inc. as of June 30,2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, changes inshareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the periodended June 30, 2007, which are contained in that filing.

 

PHILIPVOGEL & CO., PC

 
| /s/  Philip Vogel & Co., PC |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|

 

Dallas,Texas

August 4,2008

 

 

----
#### LORRAINE B. DORION, Appellant, v. BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 16231

February 20, 1986

714 P.2d 174

*Warren W Goedert,*Reno, for Appellant.

*Woodburn, Wedge, Blakey and Jeppson, Suellen Fulstone,*for Respondent.

*6OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of Bell Telephone Company of Nevada and against appellant Dorion, an industrial injury claimant claiming under a disability plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Dorion’s claim for industrial compensation was denied by an Employees’ Benefit Committee acting in accordance with Nevada Bell’s employee disability benefits plan.

The only issue which we address relates to the availability of procedural safeguards on denial of compensation in benefits for employees of self-insured employers. This case arose in 1978 prior to the 1979 legislative enactment of procedures which adequately protected claimants of this kind. No such protections were in place in 1978. Justice and fairness require that these protections be applied retrospectively; therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand to the district court with instructions that the district court order that Dorion’s entitlement to disability compensation be considered anew under the State Industrial Insurance Act in accordance with NRS 616.272. After a final determination has been made at the administrative level, judicial review may be exercised if appropriately requested by one of the parties.
# Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Office

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in section 534(d) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2005, Public Law 108-447, as provided for in the Joint Resolution Making Continuing Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-77), I hereby determine and certify that it is important to the national security interests of the United States to waive the provisions of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public Law 100-204. 

                        This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months from the date hereof. You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 05-21614

Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-


OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of AFP Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Vozick, Co-Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/       David
Vozick








David
Vozick,


Chairman
of the Board


Co-Principal
Executive Officer


October
14, 2008




36