alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007311EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/1

---

COMMISSION OPINION

COMMISSION OPINION

of 20 December 2007

concerning the amended plan for the disposal of radioactive waste from the Penly nuclear power station in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the French text is authentic)

(2007/C 311/01)

On 6 July 2007, the European Commission received from the Government of France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the amended plan for the disposal of radioactive waste from the Penly nuclear power station.

On the basis of these data, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distance between the plant and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case the United Kingdom, is 106 km. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distance between the plant and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case the United Kingdom, is 106 km.

| 2. | The planned modification will lead to a general decrease of the gaseous and liquid discharge limits except for liquid tritium for which an increase is foreseen. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The planned modification will lead to a general decrease of the gaseous and liquid discharge limits except for liquid tritium for which an increase is foreseen.

| 3. | During normal operation, the planned modification will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in other Member States. |
| --- | --- |

3.

During normal operation, the planned modification will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in other Member States.

| 4. | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents resulting from an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the initial General Data, the planned modification to the fuel management system will not give rise to doses in other Member States liable to affect the health of the population. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents resulting from an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the initial General Data, the planned modification to the fuel management system will not give rise to doses in other Member States liable to affect the health of the population.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the amended plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form from the Penly nuclear power station, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in the radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Annual Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Martin G. Paravato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 28, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Martin G. Paravato 
|Martin G. Paravato     
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IRIS International, Inc. and will be retained by IRIS International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered Dec ember 8 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01272
- CR CODY ALLAN SRADER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 219
- 80009
- 2015



### O RDER On November 10, 2015, t he Court granted the motion of Craig Price to withdraw as appellant’s attorney and ordered the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant. We have received a loose copy of the tria l court’s order appointing Maria T. Tu to represent appellant. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to list Maria T. Tu to represent appellant on this appeal.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5427 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the 

Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rattlesnake Mountain 

5 Public Access Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5427 IH

1 (1) The Hanford Reach National Monument is 

2 public land that belongs to the American people. 

3 (2) The United States Fish and Wildlife Serv4 ice’s Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for 

5 the Monument restricts public access to large por6 tions of the Monument, including the summit of 

7 Rattlesnake Mountain. 

8 (3) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain is 

9 important for educational, recreational, historical, 

10 scientific, and cultural purposes. 

11 (4) Rattlesnake Mountain reaches an elevation 

12 of 3,660 feet above sea level—the highest elevation 

13 of the Monument, and provides unparalleled scenic 

14 views over the Monument, the Hanford Site, and the 

15 Columbia River. 

16 (5) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain will 

17 increase tourism interest in the Monument and will 

18 provide economic benefits to local governments. 

19 SEC. 3. ENSURING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE SUMMIT OF 

20 RATTLESNAKE MOUNTAIN IN THE HANFORD 

21 REACH NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

23 provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Moun24 tain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for eduVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:07 May 29, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5427.IH H5427

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5427 IH

1 cational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

2 other purposes, including— 

3 (1) motor vehicle access; and 

4 (2) pedestrian and other nonmotorized access. 

5 (b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of 

6 the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to fa7 cilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain— 

8 (1) with the Secretary of Energy, the State of 

9 Washington, or any local government agency or 

10 other interested persons, for guided tours, including 

11 guided motorized tours to the summit of Rattlesnake 

12 Mountain; and 

13 (2) with the Secretary of Energy, and with the 

14 State of Washington or any local government agency 

15 or other interested persons, to maintain the access 

16 road to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bull Run Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and
belief:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: November 29, 2004/s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.

Robert S. Prather, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Drury J. Gallagher, the
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 30, 2004                     /s/ Drury J. Gallagher
                                         Drury J. Gallagher
                                         Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.5


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              BARGO ENERGY COMPANY

Bargo Energy Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify:

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.04 of the Texas Business Corporation Act
(the "Act"), the Corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation:

                                   ARTICLE ONE

The name of the Corporation is Bargo Energy Corporation.

                                   ARTICLE TWO

The following amendment of the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by the
shareholders of the Corporation on March 13, 2000. The amendment increases the
number of authorized shares of capital stock of the Corporation.

The amendment alters Section 1 of Article Four of the Articles of Incorporation
and the full text of the provision as altered is as follows:

"Section 1. The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation will have
authority to issue is 210,000,000 of which 200,000,000 will be shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Common Stock"), and 10,000,000 will be shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Preferred Stock")."

                                  ARTICLE THREE

The total number of shares outstanding of each class or series entitled to vote
for or against such amendment is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      Total
      Shares                   Class               Total Voted For    Total Voted Against
      ------                   -----               ---------------    -------------------
<S>                  <C>                             <C>                       <C>
    87,932,726             Common Stock,             72,304,085                0
                          $0.01 par value


    5,000,000          Cumulative Redeemable          5,000,000                0
                     Preferred Stock, Series B
                          $0.01 par value
</TABLE>

The holders of a number of shares greater than the minimum number of shares
necessary to vote for said amendment have signed a written consent pursuant to
Article 9.10 of the Act and Article Eight of the Articles of Incorporation and
any written notice required by Article 9.10 has been given.


<PAGE>   2


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate to be
signed and attested by its duly authorized officers, this 10th day of April,
2000.

                                        BARGO ENERGY COMPANY



                                        By:
                                           ------------------------------------
                                            Jonathan M. Clarkson, President


Attest:


----------------------------------
Secretary
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.C., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VA

MEDICAL CENTER, Decatur, GA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0520

Issued: March 22, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 14, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a December 3, 2020 nonmerit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0520.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the December 3, 2020 decision was June 1, 2021. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until February 14, 2022, more than 180 days after the

December 3, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0520 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 22-0520, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0520 is dismissed.

Issued: March 22, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. ” 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 14

                     BULL RUN CORPORATION CODE OF ETHICS FOR
                            SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

Introduction.


This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers has been adopted by Bull Run
Corporation (the "Company") to promote honest and ethical conduct, proper
disclosure of financial information in the Company's periodic reports, and
compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations by the Company's senior
officers who have financial responsibilities.

Applicability.


As used in this Code, the term Senior Financial Officer means the Company's
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (if any).

Principles and Practices.


In performing his or her duties, each of the Senior Financial Officers must:

(1) maintain high standards of honest and ethical conduct and avoid any actual
or apparent conflict of interest;

(2) report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors any conflict of
interest that may arise and any material transaction or relationship that
reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict;

(3) provide, or cause to be provided, full, fair, accurate, timely, and
understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with
or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public
communications;

(4) comply and take all reasonable actions to cause others to comply with
applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations; and

(5)  promptly report violations of this Code to the Audit Committee.

Waiver.

Any request for a waiver of any provision of this Code must be in writing and
addressed to the Audit Committee. Any waiver of this Code will be disclosed
promptly on Form 8-K or any other means approved by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Compliance and Accountability.

The Audit Committee will assess compliance with this Code, report material
violations to the Board of Directors, and recommend to the Board appropriate
action.
**Exhibit 12**

 

 

INTERNATIONALMULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Computationof Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(unaudited)

 

(inthousands)

 

 
|                                                                                  |       | **THREE MONTHS ENDED** |       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                            | ** ** | **June 1,  2002**      | ** ** | **June 2,  2001** | ** ** |
| Earnings before income taxes and  cumulativeeffect  of change in accounting principle |       | $                      | 7,910      |   | $ | 3,365 |   |
| Plus: Fixed charges(1)                                                                |       | 11,485                 |       | 6,636 |   |
| Less: Capitalized interest                                                            |       | (65                    | )          | (154 | ) |
| Earnings available to coverfixed charges                                              |       | $                      | 19,330     |   | $ | 9,847 |   |
|                                                                                  |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                    |       | 1.68                   |       | 1.48 |   |
|                                                                                  |       |                   |       |   |   |
| (1)   Fixed charges consisted of the following:                             |       |                   |       |   |   |
|                                                                                  |       |                   |       |   |   |
|                                                                                  |       | **THREE MONTHS ENDED** |       |
|                                                                                  |       | **June 1,  2002**      | ** ** | **June 2,********2001** |   |
| Interest expense, gross                                                               |       | $                      | 9,099      |   | $ | 4,159 |   |
| Rentals (Interest factor)                                                             |       | 2,386                  |       | 2,477 |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                                   |       | $                      | 11,485     |   | $ | 6,636 |   |

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Zilog, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1997 included in the 1996
Annual Report to Shareholders of Zilog, Inc.

     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Zilog, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-67938 and 33-95110) pertaining to the 1990 Zilog
Employee Common Share Option Plan, the 1990 Zilog Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and the 1994 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and in the related Prospectuses of
our report dated January 22, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules included or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Zilog, Inc.

                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 27, 1997
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4862 

To permit Members of Congress to administer the oath of allegiance to 

applicants for naturalization, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit Members of Congress to administer the oath of 

allegiance to applicants for naturalization, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE 

4 OATH OF ALLEGIANCE. 

5 Section 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1448(a)) is amended in the first sentence 

7 by inserting before ‘‘or a court with jurisdiction’’ the fol8 lowing: ‘‘, a Member of, or Delegate or Resident Commis9 sioner to, the Congress,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS