alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION



I, Jamie Kerr, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global-E Investments, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  October 21, 2004



/s/ Jamie Kerr

President

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-70085, 333-88038,333-118559 and 333-134728 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-68755, 333-69385,333-91347, 333-92437, 333-32448, 333-37918, 333-39184, 333-42498, 333-42728, 333-48224, 333-48262,333-44094, 333-54646, 333-54672, 333-68724, 333-70420, 333-73142, 333-73858, 333-86838, 333-86868,333-97539, 333-111211, 333-113395, 333-113399, 333-113595, 333-115983, 333-121284, 333-121285,333-121286, 333-123356, 333-129676, 333-129679 and 333-130209 on Form S-8 of our reports datedDecember 11, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Conexant Systems, Inc. (which report on the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphreferring to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-basedPayment”), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conexant Systems, Inc. for the year endedSeptember 29, 2006.        /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP    Costa Mesa, California    December 11, 2006
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY KILLIAN

No. 7126SC732

(Filed 29 December 1971)

Burglary and Unlawful Breakings § 5; Larceny § 7 — sufficiency of evidence

The State’s evidence, including fingerprint evidence, was sufficient to be submitted to the jury in a prosecution for breaking and entering and larceny.

Appeal by defendant from *McLean, Judge,*26 July 1971 “B” Criminal Session of Superior Court held in Mecklenburg County.

Defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging him with the felonies of breaking and entering with intent to steal, and larceny. The defendant pleaded not guilty.

*341The evidence for the State tended to show that Mrs. Amelia Grant left her home at 818 Fontana Street in Charlotte closed and locked, with one light burning in the living room, on the night of 6 March 1971 between the hours of 6:00 and 7:00 p.m. When she returned home between 11:00 and 12:00 p.m. that same evening, all of the lights were burning, the front and back doors were open, and a hole had been made in the front picture window. An electric can opener, a record player and other items were missing from her home when she returned.

The defendant, Leroy Killian, had never visited in the home of Mrs. Grant prior to 6 March 1971 and did not have permission on 6 March 1971 to be present in her home. When the investigating officer arrived at the Grant home about 12:30 on the night in question, a partial print of the defendant’s left palm was found on the outside and to the left of the broken window. There was also a left thumbprint and the fingerprint of the left middle finger of the defendant taken from a manicure box located inside Mrs. Grant’s home.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged of the felony of breaking and entering with intent to steal and not guilty of the felony of larceny.

*Attorney General Morgan and Associate Attorney General Witcover for the State.*

*James J. Caldwell for defendant appellant.*

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

The defendant assigned as error the failure of the trial judge to allow his motion for judgment as of nonsuit and to set aside the verdict. The fingerprint evidence, together with the evidence that the house had been broken into and that some of its contents were missing, and the other circumstances, was sufficient evidence to require submission of this case to the jury. See *State v. Blackmon,*6 N.C. App. 66, 169 S.E. 2d 472 (1969), and the cases therein cited.

The defendant also assigns as error certain portions of the charge and contends that the trial judge committed error in that he did not instruct the jury properly as to the presumption of innocence, expressed an opinion, did not instruct on circumstantial evidence and failed to charge on a lesser included offense.

*342We hold that the charge presented the law fairly and clearly to the jury, and that the trial judge did not express an opinion.

The defendant has had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Graham concur.
#### NIEVES BENITO CONSTANCIO, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, RESPONDENT.

No. 10316

February 8, 1978

574 P.2d 1012

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Robert B. Amund-son,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *L. J. O’Neale,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent

*72OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

After being charged, by indictment, with attempted murder (NRS 200.010; NRS 208.070), Nieves Benito Constancio, perfected this appeal from an order which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Constancio’s claim below, which is reasserted here, is that the charge must fail because the grand jury was contaminated.

The first session of the grand jury which received evidence against Constancio took place August 11, 1977. That session recessed until September 8, 1977. On that date when the jury reconvened, one of the thirteen jurors who had been present at the August session was absent; however, three other jurors who did not attend that session were present. At this reconvened session the jury returned the True Bill which resulted in the challenged indictment.

Constancio’s central argument is that the attendance of the three additional jurors at the September session contaminated the jury. In the context of this proceeding Constancio’s contention is without merit. NRS 172.255(1) provides, in part, that “[a] presentment or indictment may be found only upon the concurrence of 12 or more jurors.”

Here, twelve (12) of the jurors who attended the August session also attended the September session and those jurors all concurred in the finding against Constancio; thus, it is immaterial that the three additional jurors attended the September session. NRS 172.235.1

Affirmed.

1

NRS 172.235 provides:

> “The district attorney, the witness under examination, interpreters when needed, a stenographer for the purpose of taking the evidence, any person engaged by the grand jury pursuant to NRS 172.205, and any person requested by the grand jury to be present may be present while the grand jury is in session, but no person other than the jurors may be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting.” Here, the three challenged persons were duly chosen grand jurors and were authorized to attend the September session of the grand jury proceedings. *See also*NRS 6.110(2).
# •

• 1)\E**LH~~~~t.. kA-lf.\~~\t\E.**  \\t..**.,-----'--~**



# .**'~c..** "S ·"\\ \**~·~~4** 

### 91.

### r~--g~~L~~N~~-D~**~~~R~~~~--------------------~-~~~~­** --'---·-.·-.**~_o~C.~~-1\-~9.~~-~- \\~':>911..-** **~~R-=-'t3_ ~b~~1..--~~---** 



## ...

____ J:

__**~~C~R_~c_~::r_L~_~J~1_T~~~~R** 

### \)

__**\J._,_,~"-----''-'-'1** -----------'---



### ...

-----c--,---Loc..e\\ E..i)_. _·**~'I** 

### '2.\_F_tv\__2 4**~-~\..) ~\~\1** **'LL~** 

### .'TX ]]_'.)2t)

. _ ____,!c-/



### ·-

.. _2Lcf\"::lc..**\...)'?~1\\~\)_ffi_~_· ~~'-0** **.f\\)~~E.SS._,_,** _____________ '

___**'I_F_~~'\l~~\.)~~ It\.~_:,___-_c.,~~~** **~~N-1 ~E_B___l~\1~~-r-­** 

### --~-X~T-~~lL**~~-KL_~_~\-\\L~. \~** **~E:.\ T~-M~.** **,_S~~~£.** 

## __ \r**~E.. ~~-** **~ o~**  c_ \-\f\\N,**-c\::±~~'-J ~\-\** **N~M.ER~\J--=<l.>** 

### ______ _ 

# •

Ill' 

# • 

# •

I 

# • 

# •**~**



# '**~** 

# • '

. 

# •

.. 

# •

"" 

# .

': - _ -- -- t:..!

--**~B~~~\ ~~\\S** 



### -**t~r.-** ·

__ t 

### T**~ ~~\..\.** **~\ f\~_~a\'/\.~N'I_** 

### 1 '\__ ·**_ffi,a'-l~** 

## £\KCC)ro_·**-~~~~**

### ~0~--~~--~~~W~-~-**\~ 'tE)R_M.~~LS_(._DDK\** **~~~Re-~s** 

### .

## JZ~:s**~€.** 

## c. T

., -**~tt~~-**

# ~s~~M_~~-ll.l'l-(**-··~·. ~~~t._** **\<1\~~~\J¥\~':\t'** .**~~** 

## "\ · a..:B_,_ZnJ_'::>_·

____ _ ·-·-

# '~----------------'---RilEClE~'ffE~o**~-- ---------...,~.** **y-o~7\** 

## [)lJM_

__ 1 .COUR 1 'r vRIMINAl APPEAlS 

# I SEP 11 

### 2015 

# I

.**AOOI#!~;~~**

# 1~-------· 

# .**--------~------------------** 

# •.**~:--------------~---------------------~-----------**
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C.
Woodworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ ROBERT C. WOODWORTH
                                  ------------------------
                                  Robert C. Woodworth
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  March 4, 2004


                                       1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dominic Ng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:




(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 28, 2011




/s/ Dominic NgDominic NgChairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5213 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2010 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. FARR, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. SCHRADER, Ms. 

ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. WU, Mr. 

THOMPSON of California, Ms. CHU, Mr. FILNER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

BAIRD, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. DICKS, 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. STARK, and Mr. 

SCHIFF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Ocean Pro5 tection Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5213 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE 

2 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF THE COAST 

3 OF CALIFORNIA, OREGON, AND WASHINGTON. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil or natural gas in any area of the outer Continental 

13 Shelf off the coast of the State of California, Oregon, or 

14 Washington.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1****CEO CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), LowellR. Selvin, the Chief Executive Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, tothe best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, and towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.     **InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as ofthe 11thday of November 2005.                                             /s/ Lowell R. Selvin   Lowell R. Selvin   Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of this report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to PlanetOut Inc. and will be retained by PlanetOut Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 36
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5042 

To amend section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow 

for a private civil action against a person that provides substantial 

assistance in violation of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Ms. WATERS (for herself and Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, 

and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 to allow for a private civil action against a person 

that provides substantial assistance in violation of such 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Liability for Aiding 

5 and Abetting Securities Violations Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5042 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIVATE CIVIL ACTIONS FOR AIDING AND ABET2 TING. 

3 Section 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

4 (15 U.S.C. 78t(e)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking 

6 ‘‘PROSECUTION OF’’ and inserting ‘‘ACTIONS

7 AGAINST’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘For purposes’’ and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) ACTIONS BROUGHT BY COMMISSION.—For 

11 purposes’’; 

12 (3) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by in13 serting ‘‘or recklessly’’ after ‘‘knowingly’’; and 

14 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) PRIVATE CIVIL ACTIONS.—For purposes of 

16 any private civil action implied under this title, any 

17 person that knowingly or recklessly provides sub18 stantial assistance to another person in violation of 

19 this title, or of any rule or regulation issued under 

20 this title, shall be deemed to be in violation of this 

21 title to the same extent as the person to whom such 

22 assistance is provided.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION



I, Craig Crowell, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Timberline Resources Corporation,



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 17, 2009

| | By:   /s/ Craig Crowell
_____________________________
Craig Crowell
Chief Accounting Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------