alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 25, 2005, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 5 2005, (70 FR 17262), Rhodes Technologies, 498 
Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed in Schedule I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Noroxymorphone (9668)......................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for conversion and distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Rhodes Technologies to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Rhodes Technologies to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation 
has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the 
above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: October 12, 2005.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-20948 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
27
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

         (1)      the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

                                            Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.


Date:   August 14, 2009
                                                          By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                              -------------
                                                                  Jack Chen
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

Date:   August 14, 2009
                                                       By: /s/ Maggie Zhang
                                                           ----------------
                                                               Maggie Zhang
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14

                                 Experimed Ltd.
                                 Backbone Road
                            Sewickley, PA 15143-0408

                                LEASE AGREEMENT

Experimed Ltd. (the "Lessor") and Innovative Drug Delivery Systems, Inc. (the
"Lessee") hereby agree, effective as of January 1, 2001, to lease the services
of Dr. Leonard Firestone, an employee of the Lessor, as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Lessee on a full-time basis, subject to the following
terms and conditions:

1.    Dr. Firestone qualifies as a common law employee of the Lessee.

2.    The Lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the
      compensation to Dr. Firestone for the services provided to the Lessee.

3.    The Lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to Dr.
      Firestone for his service to the Lessee.

4.    The Lessee has the exclusive right to hire, fire and control the
      activities of Dr. Firestone.

5.    The Lessee has a right to determine the economic value of the services
      performed by Dr. Firestone (including wages and the number of units and
      value of stock compensation granted).

6.    Dr. Firestone has the ability to participate in the Lessee's employee
      benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of
      the Lessee.

7.    The Lessee agrees to and remits funds sufficient to cover the complete
      compensation, including all payroll taxes, of Dr. Firestone on or before a
      contractually agreed upon date or dates to the Lessor.

This agreement will remain in effect until terminated by either party hereto on
three (3) business days notice to such other party.

Agreed to this 14th day of January, 2002:


/s/ Leonard Firestone, M.D.               /s/ Douglas A. Hamilton
-------------------------------           ---------------------------
Leonard Firestone, M.D.                   Douglas A. Hamilton
Experimed Ltd.                            Chief Financial Officer
                                          Innovative Drug Delivery Systems, Inc.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CertificatION
of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
I, the undersigned Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    April 23, 2018 | /s/
    Daniel B. O’Brien                              
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Daniel
    B. O’Brien                                  
|                         | Principal
    Executive and Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jared P. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my bestknowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)               theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ JARED P. TAYLOR     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Jared P. Taylor         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated:August 14, 2006

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Vistula CommunicationsServices, Inc. and will be retained by Vistula Communications Services, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EXHIBIT 4.12
                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                          REPUBLIC NEW YORK CAPITAL IV

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Republic New York Capital IV (the
"Trust"), dated as of November 18,1997, is being duly executed and filed by
Bankers Trust (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, Thomas F.
Robards, an individual as trustee and Stephen Saali, an individual, as trustee
to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C.
Section 3801 et seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Republic New
York Capital IV.

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are as
follows: Bankers Trust (Delaware), 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE
19805-1266.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State.

         4. Duration. The Trust created hereby shall terminate on November 18,
2051.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first written above.

                                  BANKERS TRUST (DELAWARE), not in its
                                  individual capacity but solely as trustee


                                  By:    /s/ M. Lisa Wilkins
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                      Name:
                                      Title:


                                  THOMAS F. ROBARDS, not in his
                                  individual capacity but solely as trustee


                                       /s/ Thomas F. Robards
                                  --------------------------------------------


                                  STEPHEN J. SAALI, not in his individual
                                  capacity but solely as trustee


                                      /s/ Stephen J. Saali
                                  --------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 3.2B



                       CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
                                       OF
                                   XICOR, INC.

                          Effective as of June 4, 1999



        The undersigned, being the Secretary of Xicor, Inc., hereby certifies
that: effective as of the date set forth above, pursuant to the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote,
effective as of June 4, 1999, Article I of the Bylaws of Xicor, Inc. was amended
as follows: the former Section 2 was deleted and replaced by Section 2 as set
forth below:

"Section 2. Number and Qualification

        The authorized number of directors of the corporation shall be no less
than four (4) nor more than seven (7), with the exact number of directors to be
fixed within the limits specified by approval of the Board of Directors or
Shareholders.

        This number may be changed by amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
or by an amendment to this Section 2, ARTICLE I, of these Bylaws, adopted by the
vote or written assent of the Stockholders entitled to exercise majority voting
power as provided in Sec. 212."




                                                /S/       JULIUS BLANK
                                                -------------------------------
                                                     Julius Blank, Secretary
#### FRANCES BADHAM HOWARD, FANNIE BADHAM, BESSIE B. SMALL, SIDNEY BADHAM, MILES BADHAM, PENELOPE OVERTON, ALEXANDER BADHAM, CHARITY BADHAM, CHARLES BADHAM, PAULINE B. TURNER, FRANK BADHAM, SADIE B. HAWKINS, JAMES BADHAM, and all Other Heirs at Law of HANNIBAL BADHAM, Deceased v. LONNIE BOYCE (Now Deceased), Original Defendant, and CELIA U. BOYCE, Individually and CELIA U. BOYCE and NAOMI MORRIS, Executrices of the Estate of A. C. Boyce, Sometimes known as Lonnie Boyce

No. 751SC262

(Filed 6 August 1975)

Appeal and Error § 16 — appeal pending — authority of court — entry of summary judgment

When plaintiffs appealed from an order entered 14 November 1974 denying their motions to set aside a prior judgment, the trial court became *functus officio*and had no authority to enter summary judgment.against plaintiffs on •4'.December 1974.

*690Appeal by plaintiffs from *Cowper, Judge.*Judgment entered 19 December 1974 in Superior Court, Chowan County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 28 May 1975.

The facts of this case are set out more fully in the companion cases, *Howard v. Boyce, No.*751SC121, and *Overton v. Boyce,*No. 751SC261, filed this day. In *Howard v. Boyce, supra,*plaintiffs in the instant case appealed from an order issued 14 November 1974 denying their motions to set aside a prior judgment. On 4 December 1974 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, and on 19 December the court entered judgment allowing the motion. Plaintiffs appealed.

*Richard E. Powell for plaintiff appellants.*

*Pritchett, Coolce & Burch, by J. A. Pritchett, W. L. Cooke, and W. W. Pritchett, Jr., for defendant appellees.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

When an appeal is pending the trial court is *functus officio.*It has no authority to issue further orders in the case. *Wiggins v. Bunch,*280 N.C. 106, 184 S.E. 2d 879 (1971). Consequently, ' plaintiffs’ appeal from the November 14 order precluded the subsequent entry of summary judgment against them. The December 19 judgment therefore must be vacated- and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with our opinions in cases No. 751SC121 and 751SC261.

Vacated and remanded.

Judges Martin and Clark concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,233
<PP&E>                                       2,315,376
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,020,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,483,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          398,002
<BONDS>                                        118,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       886,543
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,483,940
<SALES>                                        162,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,982
<CGS>                                          301,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  804,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (641,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (641,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (641,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1582-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the Territory of American Samoa (FEMA-1582-DR), dated February 18, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 12, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that special conditions are warranted regarding the cost sharing arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (Stafford Act). Therefore, consistent with 48 U.S.C. 1469a(d), pertaining to insular areas, and the President's declaration letter dated February 18, 2005, Federal funds for the Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs, and for Other Needs Assistance under the Individuals and Households Program are authorized at 90 percent of total eligible costs for American Samoa. These cost shares are effective as of the date of the President's major disaster declaration.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individual and Household Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-21137 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### JAMES H. GARDNER and wife, BLANCHE A. GARDNER v. MARY GARDNER BRADY and HOWARD T. GARDNER INCORRECTLY CAPTIONED “IN RE: Foreclosure of Deed of Trust from Howard T. Gardner (Single) recorded in Book 881, page 343, in the Randolph County Registry”

No. 7219SC158

(Filed 23 February 1972)

Appeal and Error § 6— appeal from interlocutory orders — motion to strike portions of answer — appointment of guardian ad litem

No appeal lies from interlocutory orders allowing petitioners’ motion to strike portions of one respondent’s answer and further answer and affirming the clerk’s appointment of a guardian ad litem for another respondent.

Appeal by respondent, Mary Gardner Brady, from *Johnston, Judge,*20 September 1971 Session of Superior Court held in Randolph County.

This proceeding was brought to determine ownership and obtain distribution of certain funds on deposit with the clerk of superior court. The funds in question resulted from foreclosure of a deed of trust on real property, and represent the balance remaining after payment in full of the secured indebtedness and all costs of foreclosure. Respondent, Mary Gardner Brady, appealed from two orders entered by the judge of superior court, one of which allowed petitioners’ motion to strike certain portions of the appealing respondent’s answer and further answer, and the other of which affirmed an order of the clerk which appointed a guardian ad litem for the respondent, Howard T. Gardner.

*Miller, Beck & O’Briant by Adam W. Beck for petitioner appellees.*

*Ottway Bwrton for respondent appellant, Mary Gardner Brady.*

PARKER, Judge.

Rule 4 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina, as the same has been in effect since it was prescribed and adopted by the Supreme Court on 20 January 1971, is as follows:

> *648“4. The Court of Appeals will not entertain an appeal:

> From the ruling on an interlocutory motion, unless provided for elsewhere. Any interested party may enter an exception to the ruling on the motion and present the question thus raised to this Court on the final appeal; provided, that when any interested party conceives that he will suffer substantial harm from the ruling on the motion, unless the ruling is reviewed by this Court prior to the trial of the cause on its merits, he may petition this Court for a writ of certiorari within thirty days from the date of the entry of the order ruling on the motion.”

Each of the orders here appealed from was a ruling by the judge of superior court on an interlocutory motion. No petition for writ of certiorari was filed. Under Rule 4, the appeal is

Dismissed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Morris concur.