SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549
                               _________________
                                   Form 10-K

  (Mark One)
      X           ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
    -----             THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
                                      OR
    ------     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
              For the transition period __________ to __________
                       Commission File Number: 333-98529

                                  ZiLOG, INC.
            (exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

       Delaware                                           13-3092996
       (State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)                     Identification No.)

       532 Race Street, San Jose, CA                      95126
       (Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip Code)

      Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 558-8500
                             ____________________
       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes     X     No ____

The Company has voluntarily filed all reports required by section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months in
accordance with the terms agreed to in its previous indenture and its plan of
reorganization.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.   X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes__ No X

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant as of June 28, 2002, was approximately $35,607,600 based on the
closing sale price for shares of the Registrant's Common Stock as reported on
the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. Shares of Common Stock held by each
officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding
Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a
conclusive determination for other purposes.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court.   Yes     X     No ____

At February 28, 2003, 29,781,545 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock were
issued and outstanding.

                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Item 1.      Business
Item 2.      Properties
Item 3.      Legal Proceedings
Item 4.      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Part II

Item 5.      Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
             Matters
Item 6.      Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Item 7.      Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
             Results of Operations
Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.      Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
             Financial Disclosures

Part III

Item 10.     Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11.     Executive Compensation
Item 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14.     Controls and Procedures

Part IV

Item 15.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K


                          FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report on Form 10-K and other oral and written statements made by the
Company contain and incorporate forward-looking statements, regarding future
events and the Company's plans and expectations that involve risks and
uncertainties. When used in this Report, the words "estimate," "project,"
"intend," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "may," "will," and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to,
those relating to the general direction of our business, the size of the
markets for our products, the effect of the Gemplus litigation, the effects of
our chapter 11 reorganization, the costs relating to our Z80, Z8Encore!(TM),
eZ80Acclaim!(TM) and IRDA projects currently in development and the timing of
completion of our projects and our expected capital expenditures and expenses,
including research and development expenditure for future periods, the use of
certain fabrication facilities and third-party contractors, amounts of stock
compensation charges, availability of working capital, the receipt of certain
proceeds by the holders of our former senior notes, and periods to break-even
operation cash flow. Although we believe our plans, intentions, and
expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
can give no assurance that these plans, intentions, or expectations will be
achieved. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially
from those contemplated, express or implied, by the forward-looking statements
contained in this report. Factors that may cause or contribute to differences
include, but are not limited to: continued availability of third-party foundry
and assembly services at commercially reasonable quality and prices;
under-absorption of manufacturing costs in our wafer fabrication facilities
from under-utilization of production capacity; our distributors and customers
significantly reducing their existing inventories before ordering new
products; and those factors discussed in the sections entitled "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
"Risk Factors," as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Report and in
other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors
are not intended to represent a complete list of the general or specific
factors that affect us. Other factors, including general economic factors and
business strategies, may be significant, presently or in the future, and the
factors set forth in this report may affect us to a greater extent than
indicated. We caution the reader not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements contained herein, which reflect our position as of
the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release
updates or revisions to these statements.

Based in San Jose, California, we were incorporated in California in October
1981 and reincorporated in Delaware in April 1997. In this report, "ZiLOG,"
"the Company," "our," "us," "we," and similar expressions refer to ZiLOG, Inc.
and its subsidiaries. However, when these expressions are used throughout this
report in connection with ZiLOG, Inc.'s reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. bankruptcy code, they are referring only to the parent company, ZiLOG,
Inc., and not to any of its subsidiaries. ZiLOG, Z8 and Z80 are registered
trademarks of ZiLOG, Inc. Z8Encore! and eZ80Acclaim! are trademarks of ZiLOG,
Inc.


Extreme Connectivity (C) ZiLOG, Inc. 1999.

<page>

                                    PART I


ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

                                   BUSINESS

Our Business

We are a worldwide supplier of 8-bit micrologic semiconductor products. We
design, develop, manufacture and market various families of products in
support of this semiconductor market segment. Using proprietary technology
that we have developed over our 27-year operating history, we continue to
provide semiconductor integrated circuit devices that our customers design
into their end products. Our devices, which often include related application
software, typically combine a microprocessor and/or digital signal processor,
memory, and input and output functions on a single device. Our embedded
control devices enable a broad range of consumer and industrial electronics
manufacturers to control the functions and performance of their products. For
example, some typical applications include devices that control such functions
as the speed of a motor, an infrared remote control, security systems and
battery chargers. Similarly, our standard products have a wide variety of uses
including the processing and transmission of information for data
communications, telecommunications and consumer electronics companies. These
devices include serial communication controllers, modems, IrDA transceivers,
television display controllers and personal computer peripheral devices.
Standard products also include wafer fabrication foundry services for
third-party integrated circuit designs.

Our Industry

The semiconductor market is comprised of five broad product segments:
micrologic, other logic, memory, analog and discrete devices. We compete in
the micrologic device segment.

Micrologic devices are processor-based semiconductors that include
microprocessors, microcontrollers and digital signal processors that typically
process information, output data or control signals according to programmed
instructions and various external inputs. Micrologic devices also include
microperipherals that operate in conjunction with these processor-based
devices to provide systems support or to control communications, graphics and
images, mass storage, voice and other user input systems.

Semiconductor manufacturers target the micrologic market through both
application specific standard products, which we call ASSPs, tailored for a
specific application but are not proprietary to a single customer, and
general-purpose products, which are neither application nor customer specific.
We design, manufacture and market both ASSPs and general-purpose micrologic
products.

Microcontrollers typically include a system-on-a-chip, which we call SOC,
consisting of a central processing unit, non-volatile program memory, random
access memory for data storage and various input/output capabilities. The
microcontroller is a complete embedded control solution because it
incorporates application-specific software and may include specialized
peripheral device controllers and internal or external non-volatile memory
components to enable the storage and access of additional program software.
Microcontrollers are generally segmented by word length, which is measured in
bits, and are characterized as follows (references to dollar amounts are from
Semico Research Corporation Market Data Update dated January 2003):

         4-bit microcontrollers
         o  are relatively inexpensive, with a typical resale value of less
            than $1.00 per device

         o  generally lack the minimum performance and features required for
            product differentiation

         o  are typically used only to produce basic functionality in products

         o  have a minimum memory availability o have a general market size
            estimated to have been approximately $$0.5 billion2002

         8-bit microcontrollers
         o  typically sell for a approximately $1.50 per device

         o  are generally perceived as the most cost-effective embedded
            control solution for high volume requirements

         o  are used broadly in as many as 200 market categories for both ASSP
            and general purpose applications

         o  general market size is estimated to have been in the range of $4.0
            billion in 2002

         16-bit microcontrollers
         o  provide high performance

         o  strong graphic and audio applications use

         o  typically sell for an average price of around $4.00 per device

         o  general market size is estimated to have been in the range of $2.7
            billion in 2002

         32-bit microcontrollers
         o  provide very high performance

         o  favored use in intensive graphic applications

         o  focused on use in the networking and communications market

         o  expensive for most high-volume embedded control applications,
            typically selling for around $7.00 each

         o  general market size is estimated to have been in the range of $2.1
            billion in 2002

As consumer and industrial product manufacturers seek to enhance the value of
their products by increasing functionality, performance and ease of use, they
are embedding more advanced control devices into their designs. One way for
manufacturers to meet these market requirements is to use integrated circuit
devices such as embedded controllers. Embedded control devices can enable
customers to:

         o  improve their product differentiation;

         o  improve their product functionality;

         o  assist in the emergence of new classes of products and markets;

         o  transition products from electromechanical to electronic control;

         o  provide remote access control via the Internet; and

         o  generally reduce costs.

Embedded control devices continue to provide extremely cost effective
solutions for manufacturers in a broad range of existing and new markets and
as such continue to be one of the largest segments of the semiconductor
market. An embedded control solution includes both the microcontroller and
microprocessor categories of products. Today, embedded control devices are
used in a broad range of everyday products such as personal digital
assistants, known as PDA`s, telephones, televisions, thermostats, battery
chargers, garage door openers, heaters, air conditioners and a variety of
other consumer and industrial products.

In addition to embedded control devices, our industry is also focused on
producing digital signal processors and other micrologic devices used in the
communications market. These products include serial communications for voice
and data transmission in the telecommunications market and low speed modems
for a broad range of markets including point of sale and set-top box
applications. They also include IrDA transceivers for use in PDAs, cellphones,
and laptop computers and computer peripheral devices.

Our Competitive Strengths

We have over 27 years of experience in designing, manufacturing and selling
micrologic semiconductor devices. As a pioneer in this industry, we believe
that our brand name is respected and well recognized in our markets. We have
established strong, long-standing relationships with numerous customers that
are leaders in their respective markets. Our extensive experience as a
supplier of micrologic devices has allowed us to develop the following key
competitive strengths, which we believe differentiate us from many of our
competitors:

Globally-Recognized 8-bit Architecture. Our embedded control products are
known worldwide for providing versatile, highly customizable design solutions
for use in a variety of consumer products and industrial equipment. We
introduced our first Z80 microprocessor in 1974 and subsequently introduced
our first Z8 microcontroller, each of which continue to enjoy strong sales. We
offer a broad line of 8-bit microcontrollers designed to provide increased
functionality, performance and ease of use in the products in which they are
embedded. Our Z8 microcontroller was ranked as the third most recognized 8-bit
microcontroller worldwide by engineers and engineering management surveyed by
EDN and Electronics Business Magazine in 2000.

Extensive Product Portfolio. In 2002, we shipped hundreds of different
products, including field programmable microcontrollers for consumer and
industrial devices, modems used in satellite television, alarm controllers for
security systems, universal and multi-brand remote controls and infrared
keyboards. Our devices feature a variety of memory configurations, low voltage
and power, small packaging and ease of use that allow electronics
manufacturers to differentiate their products, add product functionality and
reduce product costs. Our products are supported by an extensive set of
Windows'-based development tools and proven application assistance. Our
proprietary library of reusable intellectual property facilitates our ability
to rapidly develop new products to meet the needs of our customers.

Established Customer Base. We have developed relationships with over 5,000
original equipment manufacturers and end-users, many of which are leaders in
their respective markets. By collaborating with customers in an interactive
product design and development process, we have been able to establish
longstanding strategic relationships, which solidify our customer base and
help us to define our next generation products. In our embedded control
segment, we have collaborated with such customers as Echostar (under the Dish
Satellite TV brand), Emerson, Hypercom, Philips, Samsung, Thomson Consumer
Electronics under the GE and RCA brands), and Tyco.

Industry-Seasoned Management Team. We have assembled a seasoned management
team at both the administrative and operating levels. Our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, James M. Thorburn, joined us in March 2001, having served
as a consultant for Texas Pacific Group, our former majority stockholder, and
prior to that, he served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of ON Semiconductor; Our President, Michael D. Burger, has been with
us since 1998, with responsibility for both sales and marketing. He was
previously with QuickLogic and National Semiconductor. In November 2002, Bruce
Diamond joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer with primary
responsibility for manufacturing and research and development. Previously, he
was with Sipex, Anadigics and National Semiconductor. Federico Faggin has
recently joined us as a consultant and a member of our board of directors. Mr.
Faggin co-founded ZiLOG in 1974 and has a long history in the semiconductor
field including his work for Fairchild Semiconductor where led the development
of the original MOS Silicon Gate Technology and designed the world's first
commercial integrated circuit to use such technology. Richard L. Sanquini
joined our board of directors in July 2002. Mr. Sanquini worked at National
Semiconductor for over 20 years including serving as Senior Vice President and
General Manager of its Consumer and Commercial Group.

Our Strategy

Our objective is to be a key provider of micrologic devices. Our key business
strategies include:

Focusing on Our Core 8-bit Micrologic Business. We are dedicating increased
resources to developing new applications and relationships with previous and
new customers for our existing and future 8-bit micro-logic products. Our
extensive database of code and reusable application software developed over
long years of service in these markets facilitates our customers' ability to
design in our products.

Delivering Complete Solutions to Our Customers. We are focused on providing
advanced semiconductor solutions that assist our customers in adding
functionality and enhancing the performance of their products. Our efforts in
this regard include:

         o     Collaborating Closely with Customers. We work closely with our
               customers to jointly define our next generation products. We
               believe that our strong relationships are a competitive
               advantage, enabling us to target our research and development
               investments more effectively and to maximize the quality of our
               decisions on the function, features, performance, market timing
               and pricing requirements of our devices.

         o     Integrating System Functionality into Our Solutions to Enhance
               Performance and Reduce Costs. High levels of integration can
               enable our customers to significantly reduce the number of
               individual components used with our semiconductor solutions,
               which can improve system assembly yields, reduce required board
               space, enhance performance and reduce costs. We achieve high
               levels of integration by actively developing advanced
               intellectual property that we integrate into our semiconductors
               and thereby increase the value we are able to provide to our
               customers.

         o     Providing State-of-the-Art Development Tools. We enable our
               customers to quickly design our new products into their systems
               by providing advanced, intuitive development tools such as our
               newly-released ZiLOG Developer's Studio, or ZDS II, and the
               ZPAK II emulator, a debug tool which features a networked
               device with an Ethernet interface and an RS-232 console port.
               In addition, we are working with suppliers of third party
               development tools to facilitate compatibility of their systems
               with our devices. We are increasing the number of application
               notes, reference designs and sample software applications that
               we make available to our customers in order to facilitate the
               initiation of their design processes. Through our web site, our
               customers may download ZDS and development tool documentation
               and may access a search engine that helps them to quickly
               select the best product for their specific needs. For high
               volume original equipment manufacturers, we provide extensive
               worldwide field applications engineering support, which further
               decreases time-to-market for our customers.

Utilizing Efficient Manufacturing. We continue to manufacture wafers in our
own five-inch wafer fabrication facility in Nampa, Idaho, and to augment that
production by using external foundries primarily to produce wafers with
circuit geometries below .65 micron. At the same time, we have been able to
reduce our capital and operating infrastructure requirements. As part of our
manufacturing strategy, we intend to continue to utilize third party
contractors to assemble and package our products, which has enabled us to
lower our costs and improve our cycle times and quality. It has also allowed
us to focus greater resources on product design, systems and software
development and customer support.



Products and Applications

We currently offer approximately 550 products that are sold in a wide
selection of configurations to almost 6000 original equipment manufacturers
and end-users worldwide in the embedded control and communications markets. We
operate in one operating segment that is engaged primarily in the design,
development, manufacture and marketing of semiconductor products. The
following table represents our products, their sample uses and the revenues
for each for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

<table>
<caption>

                                                                                          Years Ended December 31,
                                                                                     ------------------------------------
Products                                       Sample Uses                           2002           2001          2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                               <c>              <c>           <c>
Embedded control products include:             Security system, battery
                                               charger, OS terminal, motor
      Core 8-bit microprocessors and           control, consumer products,
      microcontrollers.....................    remote controls                    $   90.3         $   98.2      $  134.8

Standard products include:

      Serial Communications
      Controllers...........................   Telephone switch                       15.4             18.3          37.8

                                               Satellite TV, POS card
      Modems................................   validation                             10.5             20.0           6.4

      IrDA transceivers........................PDA's, cell phones                      2.8              5.6           2.7

      Television, PC peripheral
      products and foundry services            TV, keyboard, pointing device          20.6             30.2          57.5
                                                                                  ---------        --------      ---------
Total Revenues for Periods Indicated............................................. $  139.6         $  172.3      $  239.2
                                                                                  =========        ========      =========

</table>

Embedded Control Products. Our embedded control products are designed using
our globally recognized and proprietary Z8 and Z80 architectures that enable a
broad range of market manufacturers to develop products that control their
functionality and performance. These devices can be used for a multitude of
functions depending on the specific customer needs from controlling the speed
of a motor, to monitoring the charging cycle of a battery charger.

Our embedded control product focus centers on our proprietary 8-bit
microcontroller and microprocessor architectures. Our microcontroller products
include a broad range of standard products for use in hundreds of embedded
control applications. We have also developed more vertically targeted
microcontroller products for markets including infrared and home and office
security applications. We believe we are the leading independent supplier of
universal infrared microcontrollers to the universal remote control market
based on number of units sold.

The integration of our 8-bit Z8 based microcontroller with our database of
code from manufacturers of consumer appliances such as televisions, VCR's and
DVD players makes us an independent leader in the market for the supply of
up-to-date code based Universal Infrared Remote Control (UIR) devices

Our microprocessor products are higher performance products addressing the
high-end 8-bit microprocessor and microcontroller markets. These products are
available with integrated software that enables the devices to communicate
across public and private networks. In these applications the device can
function as a stand-alone embedded web server, providing monitoring and
control functionality to a remote site, using a standard web browser
interface.

In November 2002, we launched our first embedded flash-based platform of
products. Semico Research has identified the flash market as the fastest
growing segment of the 8-bit market. The Z8Encore! (TM) microcontroller is an
extension of our traditional architecture with many up-do-date features. The
current Z8Encore!(TM) products offer 16k, 32k and 64k flash memory
capabilities and will be expanded in 2003 to offer many other memory sizes. A
total of approximately 50 products are currently available from this platform.

We launched the first product in our eZ80 family of high performance 8-bit
microprocessors in summer, 2002. We introduced the eZ80Acclaim!(TM)
microcontroller, which is the first microcontroller of this family with,
embedded flash memory in February 2003. The eZ80Acclaim!(TM) products function
as high-performance microcontrollers, and have web-server capabilities when
they are equipped with various communication interfaces and protocols.

Standard Products. We call our products that are not our strategic
micrologic-based devices our standard products. Our standard products are
primarily focused on serial communications for voice and data transmission in
the telecommunications market and low speed modems for a broad range of
markets including point of sale and set-top box applications. Additionally,
standard products include IrDA transceivers for use in PDAs, cell phones, and
laptop computers.

A significant percentage of our research and development efforts are focused
on our flash embedded, flash-based products. We also continue to invest in
IrDA, with a focus on the growing opportunities in the cell phone market.

Development Tools

Our Developer Studio, which we call ZDS, is a stand-alone software development
environment that provides a comprehensive development solution for embedded
designers and incorporates our sophisticated line of development tools. ZDS
integrates a language-sensitive editor, project manager, highly optimizing
ANSI C-compiler, assembler, linker and symbolic source-level debugger that
supports our entire line of Z8, Z8Plus, eZ80, Z80S180 and DSP processors. ZDS
provides an industry standard user interface running under all
Windows(R)-based operating systems, and features an integrated set of windows,
document views, menus and toolbars that enable developers to create, test and
refine applications in a familiar and productive environment.

ZDS II is the next generation descendant of ZDS that has been enhanced to meet
the challenges of our more sophisticated developers. ZDS II supports a
scripting engine for more flexible user-configuration and automated regression
testing. ZDS II also supports a new communication layer allowing it to be
interface with third-party emulation products as well as our new ZPAK II
high-speed emulation and evaluation hardware interface. Many independent
companies develop and market application development tools and systems that
support our standard product architectures. Although we do not generate
significant revenues from the sale of development tools, we believe that
familiarity with, and adoption of, development systems offered by ourselves as
well as third-party vendors will be an important factor when considering ZiLOG
as the vendor of choice by new product developers.

Customers, Sales and Marketing

We use a total marketing approach to build relationships with key original
equipment manufacturers, OEM's, distributors and end-users in a broad array of
end markets. Our top OEM customers, determined by shipment dollars for 2002,
include Echostar (under the Dish Satellite TV brand), Hypercom, Emerson
Appliance Controls, Philips, Ruwido, Chamberlain, Samsung, Thomson Consumer
Electronics (under the GE and RCA brands), Tyco and Globespan.

To market our products to our customers, we utilize a well-trained and
highly-skilled direct sales and distribution sales force, a customer-centric
website, technical documentation that includes product specifications and
application notes, development tools and reference designs, sales promotional
materials, targeted advertising and public relations activities, and
involvement in key trade shows and technical conferences in North America,
Europe and Asia. During 2002, we derived approximately 56% of our net sales
from direct sales to original equipment manufacturers, compared to 61% in 2001
and 60% in 2000. Accordingly, net sales through our distribution channel
represented, 44%, 39% and 40% in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. In the
past 9 months, we have engaged 14 independent sales representatives to further
augment our own direct sales force. These sales representatives cover various
geographic locations in the United States and the Americas.

Our direct sales force of 47 people as of December 31, 2002 focuses on four
geographic areas: Americas, Europe, Asia and Japan. We have sales offices
located in the metropolitan areas of Chicago, El Paso, Irvine, Philadelphia,
San Jose, Beijing, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, London, Munich, Seoul, Shanghai,
Shenzhen (China), Singapore, Taipei and Toronto.

We provide direct customer support through our field application engineers,
who are located in our sales offices around the world and work directly with
local customers in close consultation with our factory-based technical
specialists. Field application engineers typically develop technology
expertise in a market segment that is most prominent in their geographic
areas. These engineers provide significant aid to the customer throughout the
design process. Customer support in the Americas is being provided by our
American-based personnel. Our local area sales offices handle customer service
functions for Asia and Europe.

In 2000, we announced an exclusive full-service distribution agreement with
Pioneer-Standard in North America and we terminated our existing relationships
with our three then-largest distributors in North America: Arrow Electronics,
Future Electronics and Unique Technologies. Our distribution agreement with
Pioneer permits either party to terminate without cause upon thirty days'
prior notice. By letter dated September 19, 2002, we notified Pioneer of our
intent to terminate the distribution, and the termination became effective as
of October 23, 2002. Pioneer-Standard accounted for approximately 12.9%, 12.6%
and 11.5% of our net sales during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively.

We then entered into a distributor agreement with Future Electronics,
effective October 23, 2002. This agreement provides that Future Electronics
will be our exclusive full-service distributor within North America and will
also serve as a non-exclusive distributor for the rest of the world. Future
Electronics is a private Canadian-based company with an extensive and
well-integrated international distribution infrastructure. They are believed
to have multi-billion dollar revenues annually, and are the largest
distributor of microcontrollers in the world. Their ability to cover a broad
spectrum of market opportunities, especially in embedded flash-based products,
is expected to provide significant value and opportunities to our new flash
portfolio. Future's Electronics' value-add services to us will include a
significant number of sales representatives focused n our business,
co-operative trade advertising, seminars and workshops to train design
engineers about our products, direct mail advertising, collateral materials
and web site pages dedicated to our products. These reasons, among others,
provided the basis for replacing Pioneer-Standard with Future Electronics as
our exclusive North American distributor.

Manufacturing and Sourcing

We operate one five-inch semiconductor wafer fabrication facility in Nampa,
Idaho. Currently our five-inch wafer fabrication facility is primarily
producing wafers with circuit geometries of 0.65, 0.8 and 1.2 microns. Our
products that have circuit sizes below 0.65 microns are being produced at
outside foundries in Taiwan. Approximately 18% of revenue, or approximately
$25 million, was generated from these foundry wafers in 2002. We conduct most
of our final test operations at our facility in the Philippines and outsource
our assembly operations to subcontractors located primarily in Indonesia and
the Philippines.

We closed our eight-inch wafer fabrication facility, which we call MOD III, in
January 2002. In May 2002, upon the effectiveness of the plan of
reorganization, the assets of MOD III were transferred to our new subsidiary,
ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc., which we call MOD III, Inc. MOD III, Inc. is holding this
facility for sale. The holders of our former senior notes will receive the
first $30 million of net proceeds (plus dividends accruing on $30 million of
preferred stock at a rate of 9.5% per annum) from the sale of the assets, and
the proceeds above this are split evenly between them and us.

The National Standards Authority of Ireland granted ISO 9001 and 9002
certifications to our facilities in Idaho. The SGS International Certification
Services AG of Zurich, Switzerland granted an ISO 9002 certification to our
Philippines test facility. ISO certifications reflect the stringent quality
standards to which all of our products are manufactured. We believe that these
certifications enhance the reputation and quality of our products.

Research and Development

Expenditures for research and development during 2002 were $17.9 million,
representing 13% of net sales and were $28.7 million in 2001, representing 17%
of net sales. Expenditures for research and development in 2000 were $36.9
million and represented 15% of net sales. In 2002, our research and
development expenditures were focused largely on new product development of
our Z8Encore!(TM) and eZ80Acclaim!(TM) product families within our embedded
control group. During 2001, our research and development activities were
focused largely on communications product development relating to our eZ80 and
CarteZian products. In January 2002, we announced the discontinuation of our
CarteZian product development efforts and the closure of our Austin, Texas
design center. As a result of these actions, our research and development
spending in 2002 declined compared to 2001 levels.

In 2003, we expect our research and development expenditures will be focused
largely on new product development and enhancements within our core micrologic
business as we continue to expand our portfolio of flash-based
microcontrollers, including our Z8Encore!(TM) and eZ80Acclaim!(TM) family of
products. Significant efforts will be directed towards accelerating our time
to market for our new products as well as broadening our capabilities by
adding new and improved features.

Competition

The semiconductor industry is characterized by price erosion, rapid
technological change and heightened competition in many markets. The industry
consists of major domestic and international semiconductor companies, many of
which have substantially greater resources than ours with which to pursue
engineering, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products.
Emerging companies are also expected to increase their participation in the
semiconductor market.

We compete with other micrologic device manufacturers who target the same
specific market segment. We believe the primary bases for competition in this
market include: price, technological sophistication, customer relationships,
support tools, familiarity with micrologic architecture, and existing customer
investment in system software based on a particular architecture. In many
instances our competitors have similar competitive strengths to us and they
have significantly more resources than we do. However, most of our competitors
are much larger than we are with broad product offerings in many sectors and
are therefore not as singly focused on the 8-bit micrologic sector as we are.
Our strategy to provide complete, integrated solutions to our customers is
designed to reduce our customers' costs by providing product innovation,
technical support, application support and software support all from a single
source.
Our current and future products compete with, or may compete with, products
offered by Advanced Micro Devices, ARM, Atmel, Conexant, Intel, Lucent
Technologies, Microchip, Motorola, NEC, Philips, Sharp, ST Microelectronics,
Texas Instruments and Toshiba, among others. However, we believe that no
single competitor addresses exactly the same set of products or markets as we
do.

Backlog

Our total backlog of cancelable customer orders was $10.6 million as of
December 31, 2002, as compared to $23.4 million as of December 31, 2001 and
$33.0 million as of December 31, 2000. Our sales are generally made pursuant
to short-term purchase orders rather than long-term contracts. As a result,
our backlog may not be an accurate measure of net sales or operating results
for any period. Additionally, during times of economic downturn there tends to
be excess capacity in the marketplace, driving shorter lead time expectations
which often results in a higher percentage of book-ship (or turns) business in
the quarters.

Patents and Licenses

As of December 31, 2002, we held 132 U.S. and 10 foreign patents and had 41
U.S. and 36 foreign patent applications pending. We have more than 80 U.S.
mask work registrations on our products. We hold copyright registrations to
protect proprietary software employed in many of our products. We have 17 U.S.
registered trademarks, 3 foreign registered trademarks, 8 pending U.S.
trademarks and 5 pending foreign trademarks. In addition, we have various
active licenses for product or technology exchange. The purpose of these
licenses has, in general, been to provide second sources for standard products
or to convey or receive rights to valuable proprietary or patented cores,
cells or other technology.

Employees

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we had 781 and 948 full-time employees,
respectively.

In order to reduce our costs and improve our operating efficiency, we have
reduced our worldwide headcount in each of the last three years. Significant
headcount reductions occurred in connection with our outsourcing of assembly
operations in January 1999 and in connection with the closures in the first
quarter of 2002 of our MOD III wafer fabrication facility in Nampa, Idaho and
our engineering design center in Austin, Texas. In addition to these actions,
we have also had various other voluntary and involuntary reductions in force
during the last three years. Most recently, we implemented a 56-person
reduction-in-force in our MOD II wafer manufacturing facility, effective March
9, 2003. Severance benefit payments in connection with this action totaled
approximately $0.6 million, and were made in March 2003. We consider our
relations with our employees to be good and believe that our future success
will depend, in large part, upon our ability to attract, retain, train and
motivate our employees. None of our employees are represented by labor unions.

Environmental

Our manufacturing processes require substantial use of various hazardous
substances, and, as a result, we are subject to a variety of governmental laws
and regulations related to the storage, use, emission, discharge and disposal
of such substances, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act, the Clean Air Act and the Water
Pollution Control Act. We believe we have all the material environmental
permits necessary to conduct our business.

In February 1999, our facilities in Idaho received ISO 14001 certification by
the National Standards Authority of Ireland, an independent auditor of
environmental management systems. We believe that ISO 14001 certification is
widely recognized as the global standard for measuring the effectiveness of a
company's environmental management.
To qualify, companies must implement an environmental management system,
comply with all relevant regulations, commit to prevent pollution, adopt a
program of continual improvement, and submit to periodic outside audits of
their environmental management system. Our environmental management system
controls and monitors all of the ways in which we impact the environment,
including air quality, water use, conservation, waste disposal and chemical
handling.

Financial Restructuring and Reorganization

We filed a pre-packaged Chapter 11 reorganization plan with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California on February 28, 2002.
The court confirmed the plan on April 30, 2002 and it became effective on May
13, 2002.

Pursuant to our reorganization plan, we extinguished $325.7 million of
liabilities, which included $280.0 million principal amount of our former 9
1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005, $27.2 million in accrued interest due on
the notes and $18.5 million of dividends payable on our former series A
preferred stock. Each holder of senior notes received, in exchange for its
senior notes, its pro rata share of:

         o     28,000,000 shares of our newly issued common stock. As of
               December 31, 2002, this represented approximately 86% of our
               outstanding equity on a fully diluted basis.

         o     100% of the newly issued series A preferred stock issued by our
               subsidiary, ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc., which we call MOD III, Inc.
               Holders of MOD III, Inc. series A preferred stock are entitled
               to receive an aggregate liquidation preference of $30 million
               plus any accrued but unpaid dividends on the MOD III, Inc.
               series A preferred stock from the net proceeds from the sale of
               one of our wafer fabrication plants located in Nampa, Idaho. We
               transferred this plant to MOD III, Inc. upon effectiveness of
               our reorganization plan. Dividends accrue on the MOD III, Inc.
               series A preferred stock at 9 1/2% per annum and these
               dividends increase the aggregate liquidation preference
               accordingly.

         o     50% of MOD III, Inc.'s newly issued series B preferred stock.
               We retained the remaining 50% of the new MOD III, Inc. series B
               preferred stock, as well as 100% of the common stock. Holders
               of the new MOD III, Inc. series B preferred stock are entitled
               to receive the net sale proceeds from any sale of MOD III,
               Inc.'s assets in excess of the series A preferred stock
               liquidation preference.

Our previously outstanding common stock and preferred stock, and all related
options and warrants, were also cancelled pursuant to the terms of the
reorganization plan, and all accumulated dividends and any other obligations
with respect to such shares were extinguished. Each holder of common stock
received a pro rata share of $50,000. Each holder of preferred stock received
a pro rata share of $150,000. As a result of this reorganization, we expect to
save more than $26.6 million in annual interest payments on the extinguished
senior notes.

Historical Background to the Plan of Reorganization

We issued our senior secured notes in connection with our going-private
transaction in 1998. Since then, our business and financial growth have been
negatively affected by the extremely difficult business climate in which we
have been operating.

In March 2001, we retained Lazard Freres & Co., LLC as our independent
financial advisor to assist us in exploring a number of strategic
alternatives. Also in March 2001, Lazard began the process of soliciting bids
for the sale of all or parts of our business. While we received a number of
proposals, each of these contained significant financing or due diligence
contingencies. After consultation with our financial advisor, we determined
that these contingencies could seriously jeopardize the likelihood that a
strategic transaction could be consummated.

In July 2001, holders of senior notes who collectively held or managed
approximately $165.0 million in principal amount of our senior notes formed an
informal group to discuss and negotiate the terms of a possible restructuring
with us. All members of this group executed confidentiality agreements and on
July 13, 2001, members of our management met with these holders and their
counsel to discuss a possible restructuring.

Discussions continued over the course of the summer and fall of 2001. During
the course of these discussions, we concluded that the best vehicle to achieve
a restructuring of our senior notes was through consummation of a voluntary
pre-packaged plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code. On November 27, 2001, we reached a non-binding agreement
regarding the terms of the reorganization plan with this informal group of our
noteholders.

On January 28, 2002, we commenced solicitation of acceptances of the plan of
reorganization from the holders of our senior notes and preferred stock. As
permitted by bankruptcy court rules, we did not solicit votes from holders of
our old common stock. In connection with this solicitation, we entered into
lock-up agreements with members of the informal group. Under the lock-up
agreements, the members of the informal group agreed, among other things and
subject to certain conditions, to vote to accept the plan of reorganization.

The voting period for the solicitation ended on February 26, 2002. Holders of
approximately $221.0 million of our senior notes accepted the plan of
reorganization. None of the holders rejected the plan. All of the holders of
preferred stock who voted also accepted the plan of reorganization.

On February 28, 2002, MOD III, Inc. and we filed voluntary petitions with the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California for
reorganization under Chapter 11. The bankruptcy court confirmed the
reorganization plan by its order entered on April 30, 2002 and the
reorganization plan became effective on May 13, 2002.

We believe that the reorganization will substantially reduce uncertainty with
respect to our future and better position us to develop new products and
maintain and expand our customer base by focusing on our core business. ZiLOG
is a pioneer in the semiconductor industry and we have a well-recognized
brand. We believe that the elimination of our senior notes, the accrued
interest due on the notes, as well as the cancellation of our former preferred
stock, will allow us to devote more resources towards developing and expanding
our core business. We believe that completion of the plan has provided us with
a stronger financial base upon which we can focus and execute to develop a
successful business.


ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

In January 2002, we moved our headquarters from a 108,000-sq. ft. facility in
Campbell, California to a 41,000 square foot facility in San Jose, California,
which we have leased through January 31, 2007. Excluding the cost of
terminating our old lease and relocation expenditures, this move resulted in
annual operating cost savings of approximately $4.0 million in 2002 versus
2001. We incurred a one-time cancellation fee of approximately $2.8 million
associated with the lease termination that was paid in January, 2002.

We currently own and perform wafer fabrication at our 118,000 square foot
building located on a 53-acre site in Nampa, Idaho. In January 2002, we closed
our MOD III facility, which is approximately 158,000 square feet. (See
Manufacturing and Sourcing.) In connection with our plan of reorganization, we
transferred the assets of the MOD III facility to MOD III, Inc.

A majority of our final test, inventory warehousing and logistics reside in a
54,000 square foot facility located in the Philippines. We have occupied this
site since 1979 and the lease is presently due to expire March 31, 2004. In
April 2002, we completed the closure of our 17,000 square foot engineering
design center in Austin, Texas. In 1999, we opened a design center in
Bangalore, India and have entered into a lease agreement for approximately
10,000 square feet. In addition, we have short-term leases for our sales
offices located in the U.S., Canada, England, Germany, Korea, Malaysia, the
People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong), Singapore and Taiwan. We
believe that these properties currently are adequate to meet our needs.


ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In June 14, 2002, Gemplus SA filed a proof of claim under our Chapter 11
proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court of Northern California for approximately
$1.5 million based on an alleged breach by us under the Development Agreement
dated July 27, 2000. We intend to vigorously contest Gemplus's claim.

We are participating in other litigation and responding to claims arising in
the ordinary course of business. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously in
these matters. Our management believes that it is unlikely that the outcome of
these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
although there can be no assurance in this regard.


ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.


                                    PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
         MATTERS

Upon effectiveness of our plan of reorganization, our currently outstanding
preferred and common stock and all options and warrants related thereto were
cancelled. All accumulated dividends and any other obligations with respect to
our outstanding preferred and common stock were extinguished. Each holder of
common stock, however, received a pro rata share of $50,000. Each holder of
preferred stock received a pro rata share of $150,000.

The plan of reorganization provided for the cancellation of the senior notes.
Each holder received, in exchange for its senior notes, its pro rata share of:

         o     100% of our newly issued common stock, except for 14%, issued
               or reserved for issuance to our employees, directors and
               consultants under a management incentive plan.

         o     100% of the newly issued series A preferred stock issued by our
               currently wholly owned subsidiary, MOD III, Inc. Holders of the
               new MOD III Series A preferred stock are entitled to receive an
               aggregate liquidation preference of $30 million plus any
               accrued but unpaid dividends on the new MOD III series A
               preferred stock from the net proceeds of the sale of our MOD
               III fabrication plant including the facility, equipment and all
               other assets necessary for the operation of the facility,
               located in Nampa, Idaho, which we will transfer to MOD III when
               the plan of reorganization becomes effective and from certain
               operating lease proceeds. Dividends will accrue on the new MOD
               III Series A preferred stock at 9 1/2% per annum.

         o     50% of MOD III Subsidiary's newly issued series B preferred
               stock. We retained the remaining 50% of the MOD III series B
               preferred stock. Holders of the MOD III series B preferred
               stock are entitled to receive the net sale proceeds from the
               sale of MOD III in excess of $30 million plus accrued but
               unpaid dividends on the MOD III Series A preferred stock.

We issued 1,862,465 shares and 2,098,667 options pursuant to our 2002 Omnibus
Stock Option Plan, which plan was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. We believe
that the transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), under Rule 701 or
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

The principal market for the Company's common stock is in the over-the-counter
Bulletin Board operated by the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc., under the symbol ZILG.OB. The quarterly high and low closing prices on
the OTCBB since our initial listing, were as follows:

<table>
<caption>

              Stock Price by Quarter                               High              Low
              ----------------------                               ----              ---


                                                               <c>              <c>
    Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002:
       First Quarter    ..............................            $ NA             $     NA

       Second Quarter.................................            $ 6.25           $   4.55

       Third Quarter..................................            $ 5.10           $   2.10

       Fourth Quarter.................................            $ 3.25           $   1.75

</table>

As of February 28, 2003, there were approximately eighteen holders of record
of our common stock. We have not paid any dividends and currently intend to
retain future earnings for reinvestment in our business or the repurchase of
outstanding shares of our common stock. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 6.  SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the following selected consolidated financial data set forth
below in conjunction with the section entitled "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and our
consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements appearing
elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for
the eight months and four months ended December 31, 2002 and April 30, 2002,
respectively, and for the year ended December 31, 2001 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 are derived
from our respective consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this Form 10-K which have been audited by KPMG LLP, independent auditors.
Consolidated balance sheet data as of May 1, 2002 and April 30, 2002 are
unaudited. The consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended
December 31, 2000 is derived from our respective consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors. The consolidated statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are
derived from our respective consolidated financial statements not included
herein which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors.

Our interim results are based on fiscal quarters of thirteen weeks in duration
ending on the last Sunday of each calendar quarter. The first and second
fiscal month of each quarter is four weeks in duration and the final month is
five weeks. Each of our interim periods ends on Sunday, except the last fiscal
period of each year, which ends on December 31. However, for financial
reporting purposes, we have labeled our interim fiscal periods as ending on
calendar month-end. The operating results for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period or the full fiscal
year. All amounts are presented in millions, except per share amounts.

Upon emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings, we adopted fresh-start reporting
in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting By Entities in Reorganization
Under the Bankruptcy Code," or SOP 90-7. In connection with the adoption of
fresh-start reporting, our reorganization value has been allocated to our
assets and liabilities on a basis which is substantially consistent with the
purchase method of accounting. Our financial statements for periods subsequent
to adoption of fresh-start reporting are not comparable with those prepared
before our plan was confirmed because they are, in effect, those of a new
entity. Consequently, the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2002
and at May 1, 2002 is labeled "Successor Company," and reflects the effect of
our reorganization plan and the associated fresh-start adjustments. Periods
presented prior to May 1, 2002 have been designated "Predecessor Company."
Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K, provides a reconciliation of the Predecessor Company's consolidated
balance sheet from April 30, 2002 to that of the Successor Company on May 1,
2002.

Although our plan of reorganization became effective on May 13, 2002, for
financial reporting purposes, the effective date of our plan of reorganization
is considered to be April 30, 2002.

A black line has been drawn between the accompanying financial statements to
distinguish for accounting purposes between the Successor Company and the
Predecessor Company.

We have included goodwill amortization and in-process research and development
within the research and development and special charges categories,
respectively, of the Predecessor Company statements of operations,
respectively, whereas these items are each disclosed separately in the
Successor Company's statements of operations. The 2002 Consolidated Statements
of Operations have been combined as a matter of convenience. The combined
results are not meant to be a presentation in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles due to the change in basis resulting from the
completion of the reorganization plan and the application of fresh-start
accounting during the period.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               (in millions, except per share data)

                                                     Successor
                                        Combined      Company                                    Predecessor Company
                                     -------------  ------------- ----------   ---------------------------------------------------
                                                       Eight        Four
                                         Year          Months       Months     ---------------------------------------------------
                                         Ended         Ended        Ended                    Years Ended December 31,
                                        Dec 31,       Dec 31,      April 30,   ---------------------------------------------------
                                          2002          2002         2002          2001         2000          1999          1998
                                     -------------  ------------- -----------  ------------- ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                   <C>            <C>         <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Consolidated Statement of
   Operations Data:
Net sales...........................  $   139.6      $    93.6    $   46.0     $    172.3     $  239.2     $  245.1     $   204.7
Cost of sales.......................       77.3           51.2        26.1          130.1        151.7        158.7         163.3
Cost of sales -
 amortization of
 fresh-start inventory               -------------
   adjustment.......................        3.9            3.9          --             --           --           --            --
                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
Gross margin........................       58.4           38.5        19.9           42.2         87.5         86.4          41.4

Research and development............       17.9           11.1         6.8           28.7         36.9         32.8          28.9
Selling, general
 and administrative.............           33.4           22.6        10.8           46.1         54.5         59.1          54.3
Operating income (loss)              -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
before special charges,
 amortization of intangible
 assets and in-process
 research and development:                  7.1            4.8         2.3          (32.6)        (3.9)        (5.5)        (41.8)

Special charges and
 reorganization items (1)....               9.7            2.8         6.9           54.3         17.5          4.7          38.6
Amortization of
 intangible assets...............           7.9            7.9          --             --           --           --            --
In-process research
 and development.............              18.7           18.7          --             --           --           --            --
                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
Operating Loss......................      (29.2)         (24.6)        4.6          (86.9)       (21.4)       (10.2)        (80.4)

Other income (expense):
    Fresh-start adjustments.........       83.7             --        83.7             --           --           --            --
    Net gain on discharge of debt ..      205.7             --       205.7             --           --           --            --
    Interest income.................        0.3            0.2         0.1            1.1          2.8          2.6           3.8
    Interest expense (3)............       (5.5)          (0.5)       (5.0)         (33.7)       (29.1)       (29.0)        (24.4)
    Other, net......................        0.6            0.5         0.1           (0.8)        (0.8)        (0.3)         (0.8)
                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
Total other income (expense): ......      284.8            0.2       284.6          (33.4)       (27.1)       (26.7)        (21.4)
Income (loss) before                 -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
   reorganization items,
   provision (benefit)
   for income taxes,
   equity method investment
   loss and cumulative
   effect of change in
   accounting principle.............      255.6          (24.4)      280.0         (120.3)       (48.5)       (36.9)       (101.8)
                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------

Reorganization items                        4.0             --         4.0             --           --           --            --
Provision (benefit)
 for income taxes....                       1.7            1.6         0.1            0.5           0.3         1.0         (14.3)
Equity method investment loss.......         --             --          --            7.2           0.9          --            --
Cumulative effect of change
 in accounting principle.                    --             --          --             --          (8.5)         --            --

                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
Net income (loss)...................      249.9          (26.0)      275.9         (128.0)        (58.2)      (37.9)        (87.5)

Less: preferred stock
 dividends accrued.                         1.9             --         1.9            5.1           4.5         4.0           3.0
                                     -------------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------    ---------    ----------

Net income (loss)
 attributable to
 common stockholders                  $   248.0      $  (26.0)    $  274.0     $   (133.1)    $   (62.7)   $  (41.9)    $   (90.5)
Basic and diluted                    =============   ==========   =========    ===========    ==========   =========    ==========
 net loss per share(2) .............                 $  (0.91)
Weighted averages shares                             ==========
 outstanding-basic
 and diluted........................                     28.6


(1)   Special charges consist of asset impairments, restructuring charges and debt restructuring fees in 2002
      and 2001; asset impairments; Restructuring charges and purchased in-process R&D charge in 2000; asset
      impairments and purchased in-process R&D charge in 1999; and recapitalization and restructuring charges
      in 1998. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)   Loss per share for the Predecessor Company not presented as the common stock was not traded on an
      established trading market.
(3)   Excludes contractual interest of $4.2 million in the four months ended April 30,2002 which was not
      recorded during the reorganization.

</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   (in millions, except per share data)
                                         Successor Company                                      Predecessor Company
                                     --------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                        As of         As of         As of                       As of December 31,
                                       Dec. 31,       May 1.      April 30,
                                         2002          2002          2002          2001         2000          1999          1998
                                     ------------- ------------- ............. ............. ............ ............. ..........
<S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents............ $    29.4     $    18.8     $   18.8    $     30.7    $     40.7   $     60.8    $    50.9
Working capital (deficiency).........      19.1          12.5          7.5        (306.9)         23.6         55.6         46.8
Total assets.........................     168.8         181.9         94.5         115.7         239.7        284.3        297.1
Total assets excluding MOD III, Inc.      138.8         151.9           --            --            --           --           --
Current liabilities..................      35.1          41.8         44.1         375.5          88.0         78.5         59.0
Liabilities subject to compromise....        --            --        325.7            --            --           --           --
Total liabilities....................      72.0          61.9        383.9         389.8         382.6        374.1        345.3
Stockholders' equity (deficiency)....      66.8          90.0       (289.4)       (274.1)       (142.9)       (89.8)       (48.2)
</TABLE>


ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
           RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including those set
forth in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and in other sections of this
annual report.

Overview

The following is management's discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. This discussion and analysis should be
read in conjunction with the section entitled "Selected Consolidated Financial
Data" and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere herein. Management's discussion and analysis provides information
concerning our business environment, consolidated results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources.

We prepare and release quarterly unaudited financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP. We also
disclose and discuss EBITDA as a measure of liquidity in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, earnings releases and investor conference
calls. We believe the disclosure of such information helps investors more
meaningfully evaluate the results of our ongoing operations. However, we
recommend that investors carefully review the GAAP financial information
included as part of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, and our quarterly earnings releases, compare GAAP financial
information with the pro forma financial results disclosed in our quarterly
earnings releases and investor calls, and read the associated reconciliation.

Our interim results are based on fiscal quarters of thirteen weeks in duration
ending on the last Sunday of each calendar quarter. However, for ease of
reading our financial reports, we have labeled our interim fiscal periods as
ending on calendar month-end. The operating results for any interim period are
not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period or the full
fiscal year, which ends on December 31 of each year.

2002 Financial Restructuring and Reorganization

Prior to February 1998, our common stock had been publicly traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ZLG." On February 27, 1998, we
consummated a merger with an affiliate of Texas Pacific Group, and in
connection with that transaction, we issued $280.0 million of registered
senior secured notes and we ceased having publicly traded equity. Since 2000,
our business and financial growth had been negatively affected by the
extremely difficult business climate in which we have been operating. We
explored a number of strategic alternatives with the assistance of our
financial advisor, Lazard Freres & Co., LLC, and an informal group of holders
of our senior notes who collectively held or managed approximately $165.0
million in principal amount of our senior notes.

During the course of discussions, we concluded that the best vehicle to
achieve a restructuring of our senior notes was through consummation of a
voluntary pre-packaged plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. On January 28, 2002, we commenced solicitation of
acceptances of a joint plan of reorganization, which set forth a plan to
reorganize our company and our subsidiary, ZiLOG MOD III, Inc.

We solicited acceptances of this joint plan from the holders of our senior
notes and preferred stock. As permitted by bankruptcy court rules, we did not
solicit votes from holders of our old common stock. In connection with this
solicitation, we entered into lock-up agreements with members of the informal
group of our noteholders. Under the lock-up agreements, the members of the
informal group agreed, among other things and subject to certain conditions,
to vote to accept the plan of reorganization.

The voting period for the solicitation ended on February 26, 2002. Holders of
approximately $221.0 million of our senior notes accepted the plan of
reorganization and none rejected the plan. All of the holders of our preferred
stock who voted also accepted the plan of reorganization.

On February 28, 2002, we and our subsidiary, ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc., which we
call MOD III, Inc., filed voluntary petitions with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California for reorganization
under Chapter 11. The bankruptcy court subsequently confirmed MOD III, Inc.'s
and our joint reorganization plan by its order entered on April 30, 2002. The
joint plan of reorganization became effective on May 13, 2002, but for
financial reporting purposes we use May 1, 2002, as the date of emergence from
bankruptcy. We refer to the company prior to emergence from bankruptcy as the
"Predecessor Company" and to the reorganized company as the "Successor
Company."

Pursuant to the joint reorganization plan, we extinguished $325.7 million of
liabilities, which included $280.0 million principal amount of our 9.5% Senior
Secured Notes due 2005, $27.2 million in accrued interest due on the notes and
$18.5 million of dividends payable on our former series A preferred stock. The
former noteholders received substantially all of our new common stock and a
liquidation preference in the net proceeds on the sale of the assets held by
MOD III, Inc. The former equity holders received an aggregate $200,000 in
cash. All debt and equity securities of the Predecessor Company were
cancelled. As a consequence of these events, the Predecessor Company recorded
a $205.7 million net gain on discharge of debt.

On May 1, 2002, we adopted "fresh-start" reporting proscribed by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountant's Statement of Position 90-7,
"Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code,"
or SOP 90-7. Fresh-start reporting was appropriate because our former
noteholders received substantially all of our new common stock and the
reorganization value of the assets of the Successor Company were less than the
total pre-petition liabilities plus post-petition liabilities.

SOP 90-7 required us to establish a reorganization value upon our adoption of
fresh-start reporting. With the assistance of our independent financial
advisor, Lazard Freres & Co., LLC, we estimated our reorganization value using
discounted projected cash flows, precedent transactions and public company
comparisons. These valuations indicated a range of reorganization values
between $70 million and $109 million, based on the underlying assumptions and
limitations set forth in their report.

These assumptions include: the successful reorganization of our business and
finances in a timely manner; the implementation of our business plan as a
reorganized entity; the accuracy of information supplied by management about
our business and our prospects; achievement of forecasted projections; market
conditions as of December 31, 2001 continuing through an assumed effective
date of March 31, 2002; and the plan of reorganization becoming effective in
accordance with the estimates and assumptions upon which the valuation was
based. In agreement with the informal committee of noteholders and with the
approval of the bankruptcy court, we established a reorganization equity value
of $90.0 million as of May 1, 2002 for purposes of applying fresh-start
reporting.

Fresh-start reporting requires that we also record our assets at fair value
upon adoption. Consequently, we engaged Key Assets as independent appraisers to
assist management in valuation of our tangible assets and we performed a
valuation of our intangible assets. These appraisals resulted in a $13.1
million increase in property, plant and equipment related to our five-inch
wafer fabrication facility. The valuation undertaken by Key Assets for fresh
start reporting assigned fair value to property, plant and equipment in Nampa,
Idaho related to our five-inch wafer fabrication facility (MOD II) and our data
center, as well as an adjacent 20 acre parcel of undeveloped land assuming a
willing buyer and a willing seller and not under distressed sale conditions.
Previously, our five-inch wafer fabrication facility had been separately held
for sale at a negotiated selling price of $3.0 million, based on a non-binding
purchase offer received from a potential buyer in December 2000. Management
agreed to the terms of the December 2000 purchase offer for several reasons
including: monetary and human cost savings compared with closing and
decommissioning the facility, as well as terminating the employees; and the
acquirer was also willing to assure an uninterrupted source of supply of wafers
manufactured in the MOD II facility until alternative sources could be
qualified. Following a change in strategy, the MOD II assets were put back into
service in June 2001. In June, 2001, management determined that the fair value
of the MOD II assets was $3.0 million.

This appraisal also resulted in a $3.9 million increase in inventories held by
us and our distributors to reflect fair value at May 1, 2002. We also
identified several separable intangible assets that were valued and recorded
as part of our fresh-start reporting as follows (in millions):

                         Asset                                Value
   ------------------------------------------------       -----------
   Existing technology..............................      $     17.0
   In-process research and development..............            18.7
   Brand name.......................................             9.2
                                                          -----------
   Total separable intangible assets................      $     44.9
                                                          ===========

We recorded a gain of $83.7 million in the Predecessor Company's financial
statements in connection with the fresh-start adjustments referred to above.
Additionally, we recorded goodwill, with an indefinite life, in the aggregate
amount of $26.7 million.

The in-process research and development was expensed on May 1, 2002. The
inventory was amortized over two months consistent with the turnover of our
inventory. The brand name and existing technology was amortized using the
pattern-of-use method consistent with underlying discounted cash flows
supporting the assets. The goodwill will not be amortized but will be subject
to ongoing impairment reviews consistent with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." See the
section entitled "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" below for more information
on SFAS No. 142.

With the assistance of professional appraisers, our current technology was
valued using the "Income Approach." Under the Income Approach, fair value
reflects the present value of the projected cash flows that are expected to be
generated by the products incorporating the current technology. The projected
revenues and expenses used in the Income Approach are based upon what our
management expects the technology to generate over the life of its products.
The cash flows earned by the products represent a return on all of the assets
purchased with the technology and employed in the generation of those cash
flows, including tangible assets as well as identifiable intangible assets.
The total return earned by the products must provide a return on each acquired
asset that is consistent with the value and the relative risk of that asset.
To separately value the current technology, the value and required rate of
return for other identifiable assets must be determined. The required returns
on these other assets are "charged to" (deducted from) the cash flow in the
model to determine the returns specifically earned by the current technology.
The residual return is earned by the technology. As part of this analysis, we
determined individual rates of return applicable to each fresh-start assets or
asset classes, and estimated the effective "capital charge" to be applied to
the cash flows generated by the acquired current technology. Capital charges
were made for returns related to the following: current assets of 6%; fixed
assets of 10%; and workforce-in-place of 15%.

We believe that the ZiLOG trade name is well known within the semiconductor
industry and that we will realize economic benefit from the name and it is
considered separable in accordance with SFAS 141. Our appraisers utilized the
Relief from Royalty, or RFR, approach in the valuation of the ZiLOG trade
name. To determine the appropriate royalty rate, we:

      o  considered prevailing rates for similar properties; and

      o  relied on the experience of our professional appraisers.

The analysis indicated an appropriate pre-tax royalty rate of 1.5%. The
avoided royalty cost was determined by applying this rate, adjusted for tax
affects, to the Company's expected revenue. Therefore, the royalty rate was
applied to five years of management's revenue forecasts. The avoided royalty
costs were discounted to find the present value of avoided cash flows from
royalties. In identifying the discount rate to be used to calculate the
present value of the avoided royalties we considered the variability of the
projected royalties. We applied a discount rate of 20% to the projected
royalties.

As with the current technology, our appraisers used an Income Approach to
value in-process research and development, or IPR&D. Under the income
approach, fair value reflects the present value of the projected free cash
flows that will be generated by the products, incorporating the technologies
under development, assuming they will be successfully completed. The projected
revenues used in the income approach are based upon the revenues expected to
be generated upon completion of the projects and the beginning of commercial
sales, as estimated by ZiLOG's management. The projections assumed that the
technologies would be successful, and that the product's development and
commercialization will meet management's time schedule. As with current
technology, the cash flows generated by the IPR&D technologies represent a
return on all of the assets purchased with the technologies and employed in
the generation of those cash flows, including tangible as well as identifiable
intangible assets. The total return earned by the new technologies must
provide a return on each asset purchased that is consistent with the value and
the relative risk of that asset. The returns required by each asset have been
shown previously in "Current Technology," which is a separable intangible
asset included in the consolidated balance sheet. We determined the applicable
discount rates to be used in the valuation of the in-process technologies
based on the risks of an investment in ZiLOG. The discount rate applicable to
ZiLOG as a whole is not necessarily the rate that is applicable to the current
technology or to the IPR&D when considered in isolation. The rate of return
required by in-process technology typically has a higher risk profile than
current technology and depends upon the stage of completion. An overall after
tax discount rate of 35% was therefore applied to the cash flows expected to
be generated by these products incorporating technology currently under
development.


Critical Accounting Policies

We believe our critical accounting policies are as follows:

      o  fresh-start reporting;

      o  estimating sales returns and allowances;

      o  estimating allowance for doubtful accounts;

      o  estimating write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories; and

      o  asset impairments.

A brief description of each of these policies is set forth below.

On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
sales returns, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory write-downs and
asset impairments. We base our estimates on historical trends and various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable at the time the estimates
are made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fresh-start reporting. Upon emerging from Chapter 11 proceedings, we adopted
fresh-start reporting in accordance with SOP 90-7. Accordingly, for financial
reporting purposes, we valued our assets and liabilities at fair value. With
the assistance of our independent financial advisor, Lazard Freres & Co., LLC,
and in reliance upon various valuation methods, and other applicable ratios
and economic industry information relevant to our industry and through
negotiations with various creditor parties in interest, we estimated our
equity value to be $90.0 million. This estimate of equity value was derived
from a weighted average of three valuations results based on comparable public
company, precedent transaction and discounted cash flow analyses. For the
purposes of the comparable public company analysis, Lazard analyzed the
trading multiples of numerous public companies in the semiconductor industry,
including Semtech, Globespan and Mitel, amongst others. The comparable public
company analysis yielded a valuation range of $70 - $87 million; Lazard
weighted this analysis 35% in its estimated valuation. The precedent
transaction analysis yielded a valuation range of $88 - $109 million; Lazard
weighted this analysis 30% in its estimated valuation. The discounted cash
flow analysis yielded a valuation range of $82 - $106 million; Lazard weighted
this analysis 35% in its estimated valuation. These valuations were based on
the underlying assumptions and limitations set forth in their report. These
assumptions include: the successful reorganization of our business and
finances in a timely manner; the implementation of our business plan as a
reorganized entity; the accuracy of information supplied by management about
our business and our prospects; achievement of forecasted projections; market
conditions as of December 31, 2001 continuing through an assumed effective
date of March 31, 2002; and the plan of reorganization becoming effective in
accordance with the estimates and assumptions upon which the valuation was
based.

In connection with the overall revaluation of the company, described above, we
recorded increases in the carrying value of our assets of $83.7 million to
reflect the fair value of those assets under SOP 90-7. These increases in the
carrying value of our intangible assets were based on three valuation
approaches, depending on the specific intangible asset to be valued: the
income approach, the cost approach and the market approach. These increases in
carrying value of our tangible assets were based on physical inspections and
written appraisals that included market data and cost approaches. Results
would have varied under different assumptions or conditions.

Estimating sales returns and allowances. Our net sales from OEM customers
consist of gross product sales reduced by expected future sales returns and
allowances. To estimate sales returns and price allowances, we analyze
historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve
level. Then we evaluate whether there are any underlying product quality or
other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above
the baseline level. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is
based on our judgments and estimates, our reserves may not be adequate to
cover actual sales returns and other allowances. If our reserves are not
adequate, our net revenues and accounts receivable could be adversely
affected.

Allowance for doubtful accounts. We maintain an allowance for losses we may
incur as a result of our customers' inability to make required payments. Any
increase in the allowance results in a corresponding increase in our selling,
general and administrative expenses. In establishing this allowance, and then
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider
the aging of our accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer
concentrations, customer credit-worthiness and, to a lesser extent, current
economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms. Historically, we
have not experienced material bad debt write-offs. If the financial condition
of one or more of our customers unexpectedly deteriorated, resulting in their
inability to make payments, or if we otherwise underestimate the losses we
incur as a result of our customers' inability to pay us, we could be required
to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts which could adversely affect
our operating results.

Estimating write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories. Each inventory
component is assessed for excess or obsolescence by using an algorithm that we
established. This algorithm is based on historical trends, demand forecasts
and inventory age. We review the result of this algorithm and generally
write-off all work-in-process inventory more than one year old and finished
goods inventory quantities in excess of our current backlog. Write-offs of
excess and obsolete inventories are reflected as a reduction to inventory
values in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and an increase in
cost of sales. If actual market conditions or customer demand patterns are
less favorable than, or inconsistent with our assumptions, we may be required
to take further write-downs of our inventory value, which could adversely
impact our cost of sales and operating results.

Asset impairments. We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." We assess the impairment of long-lived
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could
trigger an impairment review include the following:

      o  significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets;

      o  significant changes in the strategy for our overall business; and

      o  significant negative industry or economic trends.

When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of
impairment, and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than the asset's carrying value, the carrying value of the
assets are reduced to their estimated fair value. The estimated fair value is
usually determined based on an estimate of future discounted cash flows. Asset
impairments are recorded as a reduction in the asset value in our consolidated
balance sheets and as special charges in our consolidated statements of
operations.

The intangible assets created by the adoption of fresh-start accounting on our
emergence from bankruptcy consist of existing technology, brand name as well
as excess enterprise value, or goodwill. The existing technology and brand
name are being amortized based on a pattern-of-use method in proportion to the
discounted cash flows from such assets. The goodwill is not subject to
amortization.

We evaluate the existing technology and brand name at each reporting period to
determine whether events and circumstances continue to support the current
carrying value as well as the remaining useful life. Additionally, goodwill is
tested for impairment at least annually and more often if events and
circumstances indicate that its fair value may be less than its carrying
value. We expect to perform the annual impairment test for goodwill in the
third quarter of 2003, unless the existence of triggering events indicates
that an earlier review should be performed.

Adjustments to record impairment of long-lived assets or intangible assets
could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations in the period or periods in which such impairment is identified.

Reporting Segments

Beginning in May 2002, we have consolidated our business segments into one
reportable segment to reflect the manner in which our chief operating
decision-maker allocates resources and assesses the performance of our
business.

Period Comparisons

Our results of operations after April 30, 2002 and our consolidated balance
sheets at December 31, 2002 and May 1, 2002 are not comparable to the results
of operations prior to April 30, 2002 and the historical balance sheet at
December 31, 2001, due to our adoption of "fresh-start" reporting upon our
emergence from bankruptcy. However, such differences in our results of
operations relate to depreciation of property, plant and equipment,
amortization of intangible assets, interest expense and restructuring and
reorganization expenses. Additionally, these differences in our balance sheets
relate to inventory, in-process research and development, property, plant and
equipment, intangible assets, conversion of senior notes to common stock, and
minority interest. Certain figures, such as net sales and certain expenses
were not affected by our adoption of fresh-start accounting and, accordingly,
we believe them to be comparable. To provide a more meaningful analysis, in
the following discussion we have compared combined results of our predecessor
and successor company's operations for fiscal year 2002 to the predecessor
company's results for fiscal year 2001. The combined results are not meant to
be a presentation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Results of Operations

Our net sales by region, by channel, and by business line are summarized in
dollars and as a percentage of total net sales for each period indicated, as
follows (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                             ----------------------------------
                                                               2002          2001          2000
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
Net sales by region:
<S>                                                         <C>          <C>          <C>
      Americas...........................................    $  81.1      $  87.0      $ 137.2
      Asia...............................................       40.6         64.6         80.4
      Europe.............................................       17.9         20.7         21.6
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                             $ 139.6      $ 172.3      $ 239.2
                                                             =======      ========    =========
Net sales by channel:
      OEM................................................      $78.5      $ 105.4      $ 142.7
      Distribution.......................................       61.1         66.9         96.5
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                             $ 139.6      $ 172.3      $ 239.2
                                                             =======      ========    =========
Net sales by business line:
      Embedded Control...................................    $  90.3      $  98.2      $ 134.9
      Standard Products..................................       49.3         74.1        104.3
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                             $ 139.6      $ 172.3      $ 239.2
                                                             =======      ========    =========
------------------------------------


                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                             ----------------------------------
                                                               2002         2001          2000
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
Net sales by region:
      Americas...........................................        58%          51%          57%
      Asia...............................................        29%          37%          34%
      Europe.............................................        13%          12%           9%
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                                100%         100%         100%
                                                             =======      ========    =========
Net sales by channel:
      OEM................................................        56%          61%          60%
      Distribution.......................................        44%          39%          40%
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                                100%         100%         100%
                                                             =======      ========    =========
Net sales by business line:
      Embedded Control...................................        65%          57%          56%
      Standard Products..................................        35%          43%          44%
                                                             -------      --------    ---------
                                                                100%         100%         100%
                                                             =======      ========    =========
------------------------------------
</TABLE>

During the past two years, we have implemented a series of business
restructuring programs aimed at refocusing on our core 8-bit micrologic
product portfolio. In connection with these actions, we have eliminated a
significant amount of fixed costs from our business operations. Additionally,
pursuant to our plan of reorganization, which became effective on May 13,
2002, we extinguished $280.0 in million principal value of our 9.5% Senior
Secured Notes due 2005, which required $13.3 million in interest payments each
March 15 and September 15. Based in part on these restructurings, our current
break-even operating cash flow revenue level is less than an average of $25.0
million per quarter, compared with over $100 million per quarter during the
first three quarters of 2001.

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

Net Sales. Overall, similar to the semiconductor industry as a whole, we have
been experiencing weakness in demand for many of our products that has
persisted throughout 2002. Our net sales of $139.6 million in 2002 represents
a decrease of 19.0% from net sales of $172.3 million in 2001. This decrease in
net sales includes reductions in both our embedded control and standard
products. Net sales of our embedded control products declined 8.0% to $90.3
million in 2002 compared to $98.2 million in 2001. This decrease reflects
lower unit shipments of Z80 microprocessors and lower demand for
microcontrollers in the consumer market. The decline is an indication of
overall weak market conditions as well as the continued conversion of our Z80
microprocessors to alternative technologies, primarily microcontrollers and
microcontrollers with flash.

In 2002, net sales of our standard products decreased 33.5% to $49.3 million,
compared to $74.1 million in 2001. This decrease reflects weak overall market
conditions in the telecommunications and consumer sectors that resulted in
lower unit shipments of modem, serial communication, TV, wireless connectivity
and peripherals products. We expect continuing sales declines in our standard
products group reflecting weak market conditions as well as further reductions
in sales of our de-emphasized television and peripheral products. In addition,
our largest customer for modem products has migrated technologies to soft
modems and will no longer be purchasing these products. This customer
accounted for $7.2 million of sales in 2002, and $17.7 million of sales in
2001. We expect little or no revenue from this customer with respect to modems
in 2003.

Gross Margin. Our cost of sales primarily represents manufacturing costs
relating to wafer fabrication, assembly and test operations. Cost of sales
fluctuates, depending on materials and services prices from our vendors,
manufacturing productivity, product mix, equipment utilization and
depreciation. Gross margin as a percent of net sales increased to 41.8% in
2002, up from 24.5% in 2001. During the year ended December 31, 2002, our
gross margin was adversely impacted by the amortization of a fresh-start
reporting inventory adjustment of $3.9 million. Exclusive of this one-time
charge, our gross margin, as adjusted was 44.6% of sales for the year. The
improvement in our gross margin during 2002 is primarily the result of
rationalizing our manufacturing cost structure. A key element of this strategy
was the closure of our underutilized MOD III wafer fabrication facility in
January 2002. The savings in MOD III spending were partially offset by higher
spending in our five-inch manufacturing facility and from purchases of
manufactured wafers from outside foundries. However, our five-inch wafer
manufacturing factory utilization improved to approximately 70% of capacity in
2002, compared to approximately 27% in the same period of 2001, which also
helped to improve gross margin. Additionally, during 2001 we implemented a
multi-source assembly program with a number of Asian semiconductor assembly
service providers, we moved our wafer probe operations from Idaho to the
Philippines and we streamlined our final test operations. All actions
contributed to our improved gross margin in 2002.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were
$17.9 million in 2002, reflecting a 37.6% decrease from the $28.7 million of
research and development expenses reported in 2001. The decrease in research
and development expense primarily reflects lower payroll-related costs as a
result of headcount reductions. During 2002, research and development expense
also declined as a result of closing our Austin, Texas design center and the
related termination of all product development activities in connection with
our CarteZian line of 32-bit net communications microprocessors. Additionally,
in 2002, we renegotiated certain software license agreements and expensed
other surplus tools.

Our design software suite is now more closely aligned with the forecast needs
of our product development projects. During 2002 the primary focus of our
research and development has been product design efforts relating to our new
Z8Encore!(TM) and eZ80Acclaim!(TM) flash-memory enabled devices in our core
micrologic business. The first of each of these products was introduced to the
market in November 2002 and February 2003, respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased to $33.4 million in 2002 from $46.1 million
in 2001. The decrease in our selling, general and administrative spending in
2002 reflects lower payroll-related costs as a result of lower headcount,
elimination of certain outside sales representative commissions and reduced
incentive compensation and commissions commensurate with lower sales levels.
Also in January 2002, we relocated our corporate headquarters to a smaller and
lower-cost facility. Excluding the cost of terminating our old lease and
relocation expenditures, this move resulted in savings of approximately $4.5
million in 2002 operating costs compared with 2001.

Special Charges.  Special charges for each period indicated were as follows
(in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                             -------------------------------------
                                                               2002            2001          2000
                                                             --------        --------     --------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>          <C>
Asset impairments:
    Austin, Texas assets...................................  $    1.7        $    --      $     --
    Internal use software..................................       0.8            1.5            --
    Goodwill write-offs....................................       0.2            2.1           2.3
    Test and probe equipment written-off...................        --            1.4           6.9
    Campbell, California assets............................        --            1.5            --
    Impairment of MOD III assets...........................        --           30.4           0.1
Restructuring of operations:
    Employee severance and termination benefits............       2.5            6.8           4.5
    MOD III closure costs .................................       3.2            1.4            --
    Lease termination costs................................       0.5            3.2           0.2
    Stock-based compensation...............................        --            1.7           2.0
Professional fees for debt restructuring...................       5.0            4.3            --
Purchased in-process research and development..............        --             --           1.5
Other......................................................      (0.2)            --            --
                                                             --------        --------     --------
                                                             $   13.7        $  54.3      $   17.5
                                                             ========        ========     ========
</TABLE>

In the fourth quarter of 2002, severance and termination benefits of $1.3
million were recorded for the announced reduction-in-force at ZiLOG's
manufacturing facilities in Nampa, Idaho and the Philippines as well as
reduction of the Company's sales and support personnel. These actions totaled
approximately a 100-person reduction in force. In connection with the closure
of our Austin, Texas design center in 2002, we abandoned furniture, fixtures
and equipment with a book value of approximately $1.7 million. Also in
connection with this action and the streamlining of our sales force, we paid
severance and termination benefits of approximately $1.2 million in 2002.
Approximately $0.8 million of computer aided design software was impaired in
2002 as a result of our decision to cancel development of the CarteZian family
of 32-bit RISC microprocessors. Additionally, we incurred $3.2 million of
special charges during 2002 in connection with the closure of our MOD III
eight-inch wafer fabrication facility in Idaho, as well as $0.5 million of
lease termination costs related to the closure and relocation of certain sales
offices. These costs include relocation of production to alternative
manufacturing sites and the cost of closing the facility. Chapter 11
reorganization-related costs of $5.0 million in 2002 relate primarily to legal
and other professional service fees. Also, in the first quarter of 2003, we
had a 56-person reduction-in-force in our MOD II wafer facility.

During 2001, we incurred special charges of $54.3 million for restructuring of
operations comprised of severance-related expenses of $8.5 million, including
$1.7 million of non-cash stock-option related expenses; fixed-asset related
write-offs of $36.9 million, including planning software and surplus test
equipment and $30.4 million for the impairment of MOD III assets; $4.3 million
relating to financial advisors who were assisting with our reorganization and
restructuring plans; lease termination costs of $3.2 million; and $1.4 million
of costs associated with the closure of MOD III. In connection with the wafer
fab consolidation efforts in our facilities in Nampa, Idaho, we eliminated
approximately 200 positions during the third quarter of 2001.

Stock-Based Compensation. We classify stock-compensation within the various
operating expenses to which it relates, principally selling, general and
administrative expense. During 2002, we recognized $3.0 million of stock-based
compensation expense primarily in connection with the award of restricted
stock to certain employees, executives and consultants at exercise prices
below their deemed fair market value for accounting purposes at the dates of
grant in May 2002. Our right to repurchase these restricted shares for $0.01
per share generally lapses 25% on the award date and 25% on each of the first
three anniversaries following the grant date. Compensation expense for
employee stock awards was measured on the grant date and will be recognized
over each of the next three years as these restrictions lapse. Charges for
stock awards to consultants will be measured as the awards vest and will be
recognized over the periods that the restrictions lapse. Based on the employee
restricted stock and stock option awards we made during May 2002, we
anticipate that we will recognize stock compensation charges of approximately
$2.0 million, $1.8 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

In-Process Research and Development. During 2002, we recorded an $18.7 million
charge for in-process research and development relating to our fair value
allocation computed by an independent appraiser. Our in-process research and
development charge during the second quarter of 2002 relates to partially
developed semiconductor product designs that had not reached technological
feasibility and have no alternative future use on the date they were valued
for fresh-start reporting.

As of May 1, 2002, there were four projects that satisfied the criteria listed
above. These in-process research and development projects relate to
next-generation products in our Z8Encore!(TM) and eZ80Acclaim!(TM)
microcontroller product families, as well as a new infrared remote control
device and a new IRDA transceiver targeted at the cellular telephone market.
The value of the projects identified to be in progress was determined by
estimating the future cash flows from the projects once commercially feasible,
discounting the net cash flows back to their present value and then applying a
percentage of completion to the calculated value. The gross margins from sales
of these new products are expected to be in the range of 45% to 60%, which is
generally consistent with our current product offerings.

The percentage of completion for each project was determined based on research
and development expenses incurred as of May 1, 2002 for each project as a
percentage of total research and development expenses to bring the project to
technological feasibility. The discount rate used was 35% for each of the
projects. As noted above, the initial product offerings in our new
Z8Encore!(TM) and eZ80Acclaim!(TM) flash-memory enabled micrologic product
lines were launched in November 2002 and February 2003, respectively. The
nature of efforts required to develop the in-process technology into
commercially viable products primarily related to completion of design,
prototyping and testing to ensure the products could be produced to cost
effectively and meet customer design specifications, including functions,
features and performance requirements. The cost of completing development of
the eZ80 and Z8 projects were approximately $1.8 million and $2.3 million,
respectively. The IRDA transceiver project was completed in 2002 at a cost of
approximately $0.4 million and the programmable universal infrared remote
control project is still in progress. There can be no assurance that the
programmable universal infrared remote control products will achieve commercial
viability.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. In connection with fresh-start reporting,
we recorded separable intangible assets aggregating $26.2 million (excluding
goodwill of $34.6 million and in-process research and development of $18.7
million) consisting of existing technology of $17.0 million and brand name of
$9.2 million. We evaluate these assets for impairment at each reporting
period. We are amortizing these assets based on the pattern-of-use method. The
anticipated amortization schedule for these assets is as follows (in
millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

    Year                Amortization Amount        Current Technology              Brand Name
-------------          --------------------        ------------------        -----------------
<S>                     <C>                        <C>                       <C>
    2002                $         7.9               $        6.8              $        1.1
    2003                          6.8                        5.5                       1.3
    2004                          4.2                        2.9                       1.3
    2005                          2.2                        1.1                       1.1
    2006                          1.4                        0.4                       1.0
    Thereafter                    3.7                        0.3                       3.4
                       --------------------        ------------------        -----------------
    Total               $        26.2               $       17.0              $        9.2
                       ====================        ==================        =================
</TABLE>

Interest Expense. Our net interest expense decreased to $5.2 million in 2002
compared to $32.6 million in 2001. Interest expense in both years relates
primarily to interest on our former senior notes. The decrease in our interest
expense in 2002 compared to 2001 primarily reflects cessation of further
interest accruals on our notes payable subsequent to our filing of Chapter 11
bankruptcy on February 28, 2002 and the cancellation of the notes upon the
effectiveness of our plan of reorganization in May 2002. We expect continued
significant decreases in interest expense from prior comparable periods as the
Company's debt service levels are significantly lower and interest rates have
declined on borrowings under our revolving line of credit.

Income Taxes.

The components of income (loss) before tax for the eight month period ended
December 31, 2002, the four month period ended April 30, 2002 and for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, are as follows (in millions):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Eight                 Four                  Year Ended December 31,
                              Months                Months
                              Ended                 Ended
                       --------------------   --------------------
                          Dec. 31, 2002         April 30, 2002            2000               2001
                       --------------------   --------------------   -----------------   ----------------
<S>                    <C>                    <C>                    <C>                 <C>
United States........  $     (24.1)           $     276.1             $  (125.7)          $   (55.4)
Foreign..............         (0.3)                  (0.1)                 (1.8)               (2.5)
                       --------------------   --------------------   -----------------   ----------------
      ...............  $     (24.4)           $     276.0             $  (127.5)          $   (57.9)
                       ====================   ====================   =================   ================
</TABLE>

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, which are
uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance, in an amount equal to the
deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2002 has been established to reflect
this uncertainty. The valuation allowance decreased by approximately $66.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This net decrease was
attributable to utilization of net operating losses and tax credits during 2002
relating to our bankruptcy and reorganization. As of December 31, 2002, we had
essentially no remaining federal or California net operating loss carryforwards
or credits.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

Prior to January 1, 2002, our strategy, and as such our discussion in MD&A,
included the communications market and our effort in connection with the
CarteZian 32-bit microprocessor project. Since we have since discontinued this
effort with respect to the CarteZian project, we will no longer be discussing
it in MD&A.

Net Sales. Our net sales of $172.3 million in 2001 represents a decrease of
28% from net sales of $239.2 million in 2000. The decrease was attributable
primarily to lower unit shipments of embedded control products. Overall, we
experienced a significant decline in bookings and net sales during the fourth
quarter of 2000, which continued throughout 2001, and adversely affected net
sales for most of our product lines. We believe that this overall decline in
demand for our products was reflective of general economic trends during this
period, particularly in the high technology sector, and may continue for
several quarters. Net sales from our communications segment declined 15.1% to
$77.2 million in 2001 compared to 2000, which was primarily the result of
lower unit shipments of serial communications, wireless connectivity and DSL
products, related to overall weakness in the telecommunications market. These
sales declines were offset partially by higher unit sales of modem products
for set-top boxes relating to satellite television equipment. In 2001, net
sales from our embedded control segment decreased 34.4% to $93.1 million as a
result of decreased unit shipments of Z80 microprocessors and Z8
microcontrollers. We believe that these unit sales declines are reflective of
the overall weak climate as well as our decision to exit certain product
lines, including military products and PC peripheral products. During 1999 we
began to de-emphasize our peripherals product line and in 2000, we announced
the discontinuation of our military business line. Accordingly, during 2001,
net sales of our peripheral products were $4.9 million compared to $15.4
million in 2000 and we had no military product sales in 2001, compared to
$10.7 million in 2000. We expect continuation of the trend of declining net
sales of PC peripheral products.

Net sales of our products in the Americas in 2001 decreased 36.6% from $137.2
million in 2000 to $87.0 million. Net sales of our products in Asia in 2001
decreased 19.7% to $64.6 million from $80.4 million in 2000, and net sales of
our products in Europe declined by 4.2% to $20.7 million in 2001 from $21.6
million in 2000.

Gross Margin. Our cost of sales represents the cost of our wafer fabrication,
assembly and test operations. Cost of sales fluctuates, depending on
manufacturing productivity, product mix, equipment utilization and
depreciation. Gross margin as a percent of net sales declined to 24.5% in 2001
from 36.6% in 2000. This decline in gross margin was primarily brought on by a
substantial reduction in sales volume that translated into significant factory
under-utilization and resulted in under-absorbed factory overhead and
unfavorable manufacturing variances during 2001. As a consequence of our
surplus wafer fabrication capacity, we announced in July 2001 that our wafer
manufacturing plants would be consolidated. In January 2002, we closed our
eight-inch MOD III wafer fabrication facility. During December 2000, we
wrote-down the book value of our five-inch wafer fabrication facility, which
was being held for sale until June 2001, as we describe below in the section
entitled "Special Charges." After actively pursuing the sale of our five-inch
wafer fabrication facility to several potential buyers, we were unable to
consummate a sale and the fabrication facility was placed back into productive
asset status in July 2001. During 2001, depreciation expense was reduced by
approximately $2.8 million as a result of the fiscal 2000 write-down in book
value of the five-inch wafer fabrication facility assets and due to holding of
these assets for sale during that period. Subsequent to this, with the change
in management and market focus in June 2001, we made the decision to retain the
five-inch facility called MOD II, and to close and consolidate the eight-inch
facility called MOD III.

Research and Development Expenses. Our research and development expenses
decreased to $28.7 million in 2001 from $36.9 million in 2000. The 2001
decrease in research and development spending was due principally to lower
headcount and reduced spending in our central process technology organization,
elimination of goodwill amortization in connection with the write-off of our
investment in the assets of Seattle Silicon Corporation, and an overall
reduction in the number of product development projects.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased to $46.1 million in 2001 from $54.5 million
in 2000, but increased as a percentage of net sales to 26.8% in 2001 from
22.8% in 2000. The decrease in our selling, general and administrative
spending in 2001 was due primarily to lower payroll-related costs as a result
of lower headcount, elimination of outside sales representative commissions
and reduced incentive compensation and commissions. Also during 2000 we
incurred a $1.1 million charge for expenses relating to our planned initial
public offering of common stock, which were not recurring costs in 2001.

The following table details special charge accrual activity and ending accrual
balances for the years ended December 31, 2002, December 31, 2001 and December
31, 2000 (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Severance and          Lease                           MOD III
                                           Termination        Termination         Debt           Closure
                                            Benefits            Charges       Restructuring        Costs            Total
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Balance at December 31, 1999............   $      --          $      --        $     --        $      --          $    --
   Total special charges................          6.5               0.2              --               --                6.7
   Cash paid............................         (1.2)             (0.1)             --               --               (1.3)
    Deferred stock compensation.........         (2.0)               --              --               --            (   2.0)
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Balance at December 31, 2000............          3.3                0.1             --               --                3.4
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Total charge to special charges.........          6.8                3.2              4.3              1.4             15.7
   Cash paid............................         (4.5)              (0.5)            (3.2)            (1.2)            (9.4)
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Balance at December 31, 2001............          5.6                2.8              1.1              0.2              9.7
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Total charge to special charges.........          1.2                0.7              4.0              2.3              8.2
   Cash paid............................         (6.0)              (3.0)            (2.5)            (2.3)           (13.8)
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Balance at April 30, 2002...............          0.8                0.5              2.6              0.2              4.1
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Total charge to special charges.........          1.3               (0.2)             1.0              0.9              3.0
   Cash paid............................         (1.6)              (0.3)            (3.6)            (1.0)            (6.5)
                                           ----------         ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Balance at December 31, 2002............   $      0.5         $       --       $      --        $      0.1       $      0.6
                                           ==========         ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
</TABLE>


Background Discussion and Summary of Special Actions. Beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2000, we experienced a sharp decrease in bookings and billings in
most of our product lines and this weak customer demand trend has persisted.
We believe that the decline in demand for our products is reflective of global
economic conditions, particularly in high technology markets.

In response to our declining net sales, and under the leadership of our chief
executive officer, James M. Thorburn, we commenced a series of operational
restructuring activities designed to refocus on our core micrologic business
and reduce our overall cost structure. More detail of these restructuring
actions and the related costs are included in the "Special Charges" captions
in the sections entitled Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2001 and Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2000.

The costs of these actions were recorded as special charges and included the
following actions, in chronological order:

      o  In December 2000, April 2001 and June 2001, we implemented a series of
         severance actions that resulted in elimination of over 500 positions
         throughout the Company. Over half of these reductions were in our
         manufacturing functions, particularly in our Philippine test
         operations and at our MOD III facility in Nampa, Idaho, and we also
         reduced our executive management team from 15 people down to 5 people.

      o  In December 2000, we recorded a special charge for long-lived asset
         impairments of $9.3 million that primarily relates to the impairment
         of our MOD II facility based on our intention at the time to sell the
         facility.

      o  In the first quarter of 2001, we engaged Lazard Freres & Co., LLC as
         our independent financial advisor to begin evaluating various
         strategic alternatives, including a possible sale or reorganization of
         the company.

      o  During June 2001, we announced plans to consolidate our two Nampa,
         Idaho manufacturing facilities and to transfer wafer probe operations
         from Nampa to the Philippines. The wafer probe transfer was completed
         in October 2001 and the Nampa consolidation was finalized in January
         2002.

      o  In September 2001, we did not make the scheduled interest payment on
         our notes payable and announced that we had entered into discussions
         with an informal group of our noteholders to restructure our
         indebtedness.

      o  In December 2001, we recorded a $30.4 million charge for impairment of
         our MOD III wafer fabrication facility that is being held for
         disposal. We also accrued contractual bonuses for the MOD III
         employees that stayed-on with us to close the factory and make it
         ready for sale.

      o  Also in December 2001, we negotiated a buy-out of our Campbell,
         California headquarters facility lease and entered into a new lease in
         San Jose, California that is expected to save us $4.5 million in
         operating expenses for 2002 versus 2001, excluding one-time costs. The
         one-time expenditures associated with relocating our headquarters
         totaled $5.0 million, comprised of: $2.8 million special charge for
         the lease buy-out; $1.5 million special charge for non-cash loss on
         disposal of fixed assets; $0.2 million special charge for moving
         expenses; and $0.5 million capital expenditures relating to our new
         facility.

      o  In the first quarter of 2002, we filed a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan
         of reorganization with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
         Northern District of California and we announced the discontinuation
         of all product development activities related to our CarteZian line of
         32-bit RISC microprocessors. We also closed our Austin, Texas design
         center and several domestic and international sales offices.

      o  On May 13, 2002, our plan of reorganization became effective.

2001 Special Charges Analysis.  Our 2001 special charges, as summarized above,
are described below.

During 2001, we had asset impairment charges totaling $36.9 million. This
charge includes a $30.4 million write-down in the carrying value of our MOD
III eight-inch wafer fabrication facility in Nampa, Idaho to its estimated
fair value of $30.0 million. The write-down of MOD III was predicated on
idling the facility and the fair value was determined as follows:

      o  MOD III machinery and equipment were determined with the assistance of
         an appraiser who specializes in semiconductor industry, and

      o  MOD III land and building was determined based on market comparison
         with similar properties and based on consultation with a commercial
         real estate agent.

MOD III completed its final manufacturing in January 2002. The property, plant
and equipment of MOD III were idled in January 2002, and are being held for
sale. We have engaged a company who specializes in the disposition of
semiconductor manufacturing equipment and facilities to actively market the
MOD III facility for sale. Our desire is to sell MOD III as expeditiously as
possible, although given weak current market conditions and the high level of
excess manufacturing capacity in the semiconductor industry, we are unable to
determine when or if we will be able to sell MOD III. As described in the
section titled "Financial Restructuring and Reorganization," in accordance
with the reorganization plan, we transferred the assets of MOD III to a new
subsidiary that we own jointly with our former noteholders.

We had additional asset impairments in 2001, totaling $6.5 million, which were
comprised of:

      o  $2.9 million of various surplus assets in the second quarter of 2001
         relating to a purchased internal use materials planning software that
         was never deployed and surplus test equipment;

      o  $1.5 million of abandoned furniture, fixtures and building
         improvements that were transferred to our landlord in connection with
         the early termination of our headquarters lease in Campbell,
         California; and

      o  $2.1 million impairment of goodwill associated with the business we
         acquired from Calibre, Inc. in July 2000. We determined that the
         Calibre goodwill was impaired based on the under-performance of this
         product group compared to the original acquisition business case on
         which the goodwill was based.

During 2001, we recorded $6.8 million of employee retention bonuses, severance
pay and termination benefits that were payable in cash. In addition, we
incurred $1.7 million of stock-based compensation associated with executives
of the pre-reorganization's management team who received accelerated vesting
and extended exercise terms on stock options in connection with their
severance packages. We accrued involuntary termination costs after management
has approved a plan of termination, including identification of specific job
functions to be eliminated, and the termination benefits have been
communicated to those employees that may be affected by the action. The $6.8
million of cash costs consisted of:

      o  $4.5 million for employee retention bonuses, severance, and
         termination benefits to the employees who were terminated in
         connection with our reduction in force due to the closure of our
         eight-inch wafer fabrication facility in Nampa, Idaho. Employees who
         were terminated in connection with the closure of MOD III entered into
         contracts pursuant to which they received termination benefits
         including stay-on bonuses, severance and medical benefits payable on
         their termination concurrent with the fab closure. We accrued the $4.5
         million contracted termination benefits expense ratably over the
         employee's service period during the six months ended December 31,
         2001. This action resulted in the reduction of approximately 150
         employees. At December 31, 2001, approximately $4.2 million was
         accrued for these payments, which amount was paid primarily in the
         first quarter of 2002. Also at December 31, 2001 we had $1.4 million
         of severance accruals relating to the final payments of 2002, due in
         connection with the termination of the employment contracts with
         certain pre-reorganization executives.

      o  $2.3 million for the reduction of severance benefits were accrued in
         the second quarter of 2001. These actions primarily related to
         approximately 65 manufacturing positions in our Philippine test
         facility, elimination of approximately 50 engineering and other
         domestic personnel largely in our central technology group in Nampa,
         Idaho, and elimination of four senior executive positions in our
         corporate headquarters.

      o  At December 31, 2001, we had approximately $5.6 million of severance
         accruals relating to these and previous actions. We paid approximately
         $4.5 million of this amount in the first quarter of 2002 upon the
         closure of MOD III and the balance of $1.1 million was paid in 2002
         over the remaining periods left under the terminated ' employment
         agreements of certain pre-reorganization executives.

We incurred contract termination charges of $3.2 million in 2001, which
related to:

      o  In November 2001, we negotiated an agreement with the owner of our
         Campbell, California headquarters facility to terminate our lease. We
         agreed to pay termination charges of approximately $2.8 million in
         cash and transfer title to certain assets and leasehold improvements
         in return for cancellation of approximately $10.0 million in future
         lease commitments on our 108,000 square foot headquarters facility. We
         finalized our headquarters relocation in January 2002 and, at that
         time, paid the $2.8 million settlement to our former landlord.

      o  During the fourth quarter of 2001, we reached a settlement agreement
         with our equity investment partner, Qualcore Group, Inc. in which we
         paid Qualcore a termination charge of $450,000, and returned all the
         shares representing our 20% equity ownership in Qualcore to the former
         owners of Qualcore. In return, Qualcore cancelled its right to "put"
         approximately 11% of Qualcore's common stock to us for an aggregate
         cost of $5.2 million. All future design services from Qualcore, if
         any, will be purchased under standard pay-for-performance-and-delivery
         contracts.

We incurred other special charges in 2001 totaling $1.4 million that related
primarily to manufacturing consolidation and relocation costs associated with
moving our wafer probe operation from Nampa, Idaho to the Philippines. These
costs were expensed as incurred, primarily during the fourth quarter of 2001.
Approximately $0.2 million was accrued for payment in connection with these
consolidation costs at December 31, 2001.

We incurred $4.3 million of professional fees for financial advisors that
assisted us in connection with our debt restructuring. We recorded the special
charges for these fees as the services were performed throughout the year. At
December 31, 2001, approximately $1.1 million was accrued for future payments
in connection with these professional fees incurred during 2001, which fees
were paid in 2002.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $33.7 million in 2001 from
$29.1 million in 2000. Interest expense in both years relates primarily to our
senior notes issued in conjunction with our recapitalization merger in
February 1998. The increase in our interest expense in 2001 compared to 2000
relates primarily to interest on borrowings under our revolving credit
facility and a $4.2 million dollar write off of all remaining unamortized net
debt issuance cost in the fourth quarter of 2001, as a result of the default
on our senior notes

Income Taxes. Our provision for income taxes in both 2001 and 2000 reflects
foreign income taxes for the jurisdictions in which we were profitable as well
as foreign withholding taxes.

Equity in Loss of Qualcore Group, Inc. In March 2000, we acquired a 20% equity
stake in Qualcore Group, Inc. for approximately $8.1 million. We accounted for
this investment under the equity method. During the fourth quarter of 2001, we
terminated our agreement with Qualcore. As a result of this transaction, we
recorded a $5.8 million charge to write off the book value of our equity
investment in Qualcore. The loss in equity of Qualcore Group, Inc. also
includes the amortization of goodwill associated with our equity investment.

<PAGE>

Quarterly Results (unaudited)

The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial information (in
millions) for each of the quarters of 2002 and 2001. The financial information
presented for the first quarter of 2002 is that of the "Predecessor Company"
only; the second quarter of 2002 is the combined results of the "Predecessor
Company" and the "Successor Company"; the third and fourth quarters of 2002
are the "Successor Company" only. This combined presentation for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002 is not a presentation under generally accepted accounting
standards. The Company's year-end is December 31, with interim results based
on fiscal quarters of thirteen weeks of duration ending on the last Sunday of
each quarter. However, for financial reporting purposes interim fiscal periods
are labeled as ending on calendar-month end.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Quarter Ended (Unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Dec. 31,   Sep. 30,   June 30,   Mar. 31,    Dec. 31,   Sep. 30,    June 30,   Mar. 31,
                                             2002      2002       2002       2002       2001        2001        2001       2001
                                          ---------  --------   --------   --------    --------   --------    --------   --------
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>       <C>
Net sales...............................  $  29.5    $  36.0    $  38.1    $   36.0    $  41.4    $  42.7      $  44.0   $  44.2
Cost of sales...........................     15.8       19.9       21.3        20.3       27.0       29.4         35.5      38.2
Cost of sales- fresh-start
inventory adjustment....................       --         --        3.9          --         --        --           --       --
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin............................     13.7       16.1       12.9        15.7       14.4       13.3           8.5      6.0
Gross margin in %.......................      46%        45%        34%         44%        35%        31%           19%      14%
Operating Expenses:
  Research and development..............      3.9        4.1        4.7         5.2        6.5        5.9           7.2      9.1
  Selling, general & administrative.....      7.2        8.2        9.9         8.1       10.1        9.6          12.9     13.5
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Operating income/(loss) before
    special charges and certain
    non-cash charges....................      2.6        3.8        1.7         2.4        2.2        2.2         (11.6)   (16.6)
Special charges & reorganization
    items (See Note 7)..................      1.7        0.8        1.6         5.6       41.7        4.5           8.1       --
Amortization of intangible assets.......      2.9        3.0        2.0          --         --         --           --        --
In-process research & development.......       --         --       18.7          --         --         --           --        --
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating loss..........................     (2.0)        --      (24.0)       (3.2)     (43.9)      (6.7)        (19.7)   (16.6)
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other income (expense):
   Fresh-start adjustments..............       --         --       83.7         --          --         --            --       --
   Net gain on discharge of debt........       --         --      205.7         --          --         --            --       --
   Interest income......................      0.1        0.1        --         0.1         0.1        0.2           0.3      0.5
   Interest expense.....................     (0.1)      (0.1)      (0.3)      (5.0)      (11.8)      (7.3)         (7.3)    (7.3)
   Other, net...........................       --        0.4        0.1        0.1        (0.1)      (0.5)          0.1     (0.3)
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before
reorganization items,
income taxes and equity
method investment loss..................     (2.0)       0.4      265.2       (8.0)      (55.7)     (14.3)       (26.6)    (23.7)
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reorganization items....................      --         --         0.2        3.8         --         --           --        --
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for income taxes..............      0.8        0.2        0.6        0.1         0.3        --           0.1       0.1
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before equity  method
investment loss.........................     (2.8)       0.2      264.4      (11.9)      (56.0)     (14.3)       (26.7)    (23.8)
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity method investment loss...........      --         --         --          --        (6.1)      (0.4)        (0.4)     (0.3)
                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss).......................    ($2.8)      $0.2     $264.4     ($11.9)     ($62.1)    ($14.7)      ($27.1)   ($24.1)
                                          ======================================================================================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a result of the economic downturn and decline in our results of operations
that began in 2000, we became unable to continue servicing the interest on our
debt. As noted previously, on February 28, 2002, we filed a voluntary
prepackaged plan of reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court confirmed our reorganization plan on
April 30, 2002. The plan of reorganization became effective on May 13, 2002
and resulted in the extinguishment of $325.7 million of liabilities.

As of December 31, 2002, we had cash and cash equivalents of $29.4 million,
compared to $30.7 million at December 31, 2001.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy, we entered into a new credit facility with the
same commercial lender as our previous credit facility. The new facility is a
three-year $15.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The new
facility is on substantially similar terms as our previous revolving credit
facility, except that borrowings bear interest at a rate per annum equal, at
our option, to the commercial lender's stated prime rate or LIBOR, plus 2.5%.
We have elected the LIBOR interest rate option, which, as of December 31, 2002
was 4.4%. The previous revolving credit facility and capital expenditure line
was cancelled. As of December 31, 2002, we had outstanding borrowings of $6.9
million and standby letters of credit of $0.8 million. As of February 28, 2003
outstanding borrowings totaled $5.0 million and there was no additional
borrowing capacity available under the facility. Our ability to borrow under
the facility is based on a monthly borrowing base calculation that is
determined as a percentage of eligible accounts receivable. If we decide to
pay the necessary fee to qualify certain foreign accounts receivable in our
borrowing base, we could borrow up to an additional $2.2 million under our
revolving credit facility at February 28, 2003. For the year ended December
31, 2002, we made repayments on our revolving credit facility totaling $5.9
million. We are subject to certain financial covenants under this facility,
including tangible net asset balance and fixed charge coverage ratios only if
the total of our cash, cash equivalents and availability on the revolving
credit facility are less than $7.5 million at any month end.

Cash provided by operating activities was $7.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, compared to $18.8 million of cash used by operating
activities in the 2001. Cash provided by operating activities in 2002
primarily reflects our adjusted net loss of $39.5 million (excluding the
non-cash gain on discharge of debt of $205.7 million and fresh-start
adjustments of $83.7 million), adjusted for the following non-cash items:
depreciation and amortization of $14.8 million; in-process research and
development of $18.7 million; fresh-start inventory charge of $3.9 million;
impairment of long-lived assets of $2.7 million; $3.0 million of stock-based
compensation; and $0.1 million on the loss from the disposal of equipment.
During 2002, our significant use of operating cash included cash payments for
special charges of $20.3 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, our operating activities used net
cash of $18.8 million, which was primarily attributable to our overall net
loss of $128 million adjusted for the following non-cash items: $37.9 million
of depreciation and amortization; $36.9 million of impairments of long-lived
assets and goodwill; $1.9 million stock based compensation, and $7.2 million
equity in loss of Qualcore Group, Inc., which includes a write-off of equity
assets of $5.8 million. Reductions in inventories, accounts receivable and
prepaid and other assets totaled $35.4 million and contributed to 2001
operating cash flow, as did a $13.6 million increase in accrued interest
expense. Decreases in accounts payable, accrued compensation and employee
benefits and other accrued and non-current liabilities used a total of $24.4
million of operating cash during 2001.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, our operating activities provided net
cash of $8.5 million, which was primarily attributable to our overall net loss
of $58.2 million adjusted for the following non-cash items: $41.9 million of
depreciation and amortization; $9.3 million write-down of long-lived assets;
$8.5 million cumulative change in accounting principle; $2.6 million stock
option compensation; $1.5 million of purchased in-process research and
development expense, and $0.9 million equity in loss of Qualcore Group, Inc.

Cash used by investing activities was $2.3 million for the year ended December
31, 2002 and was $4.1 million for 2001. Cash used for investing activities in
both periods reflects capital expenditures. In 2002, capital expenditures
related primarily to furniture and fixtures for our new San Jose headquarters
and replacements of manufacturing equipment. Capital expenditures in 2001
primarily related to equipment in our MOD III wafer manufacturing facility.
During the year ended December 31, 2000, our investing activities used cash of
$30.3 million consisting of $21.9 million of capital expenditures and $8.4
million, including expenses, for the acquisition of a 20% equity investment in
Qualcore with an option to purchase the remaining 80% interest. During 2000,
our capital expenditures primarily related to enhancements to our 0.35-micron
wafer manufacturing capability.

Cash used for financing activities in 2002 was $6.0 million, primarily
representing repayments on our revolving line of credit. During the year ended
December 31, 2001, cash provided from financing activities totaled $12.9
million and represented $12.8 million of borrowings on our revolving credit
facility and $0.1 million of proceeds received from issuance of common stock
pursuant to stock option exercises. During the year ended December 31, 2000,
cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.7 million and related
primarily to $2.6 million of proceeds received from issuance of common stock
pursuant to stock sales and stock option exercises, which were offset by
principal payments under capital leases of $0.9 million.

The EBITDA figures presented below reflect a non-GAAP measure of our
liquidity. These figures reflect our net income adjustment for non-cash items,
interest and income taxes. Our management uses separate "adjusted EBITDA"
calculations for purposes of determining certain employees' incentive
compensation and, subject to meeting specified adjusted EBITDA amounts, for
accelerating the vesting of EBITDA-linked stock options. This measure of
adjusted EBITDA was approved as part of our plan of reorganization. Adjusted
EBITDA, as we define it, excludes interest, income taxes, effects of changes
in accounting principles and equity adjustments and non-cash charges such as
depreciation, amortization, in-process research and development, and
stock-based compensation expense. It also excludes cash and non-cash charges
associated with reorganization items and special charges, which represent
operational restructuring charges, including asset write-offs, employee
termination costs, and lease termination costs. The differences between the
EBITDA figures below and our adjusted EBITDA relate to the following
cash-settled reorganization and special items that are added-back in our
adjusted EBITDA computations:

o Employee retention bonuses, severance pay and termination benefits;
o Professional fees for debt restructuring;
o Lease termination costs;
o Termination and exit charges, and
o MOD III closure costs.

Our EBITDA, reconciled to cash provided (used) by operations (the most directly
comparable measure of liquidity under generally accepted accounting principles)
for each year presented, is as follows (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                                                  ----------------------------------------------------
                                                                    2002                   2001                 2000
                                                                  --------              --------              --------
<S>                                                           <C>                   <C>                   <C>
Reconciliation of cash provided (used) by operations to EBITDA:
      Cash flow from operations............................       $    7.0              $  (18.8)             $    8.5
      Interest paid........................................            0.9                  14.4                  26.9
      Income taxes paid....................................            0.4                   0.5                   0.2
      Change in operating assets and liabilities...........            2.2                  (7.1)                 (2.5)
                                                                  --------              --------              --------
EBITDA.....................................................       $   10.5              $  (11.0)             $   33.1
                                                                  ========              ========              ========
</TABLE>

Note: Figures for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflect combined results of
the Predecessor Company and the Successor Company. Figures for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 reflect only the Predecessor Company.

Our cash needs for 2003 include working capital, professional fees in
connection with the finalization of our registration statement on Form S-1 and
capital expenditures. In March 2003, we announced and completed a further
restructuring of our MOD II wafer fabrication operations that resulted in the
elimination of approximately 70 positions and cost approximately $0.6 million
in severance benefits. This action was intended to more closely align our
production output capacity with current customer demand. The 2003 business
climate is expected to continue to be difficult. However, we currently
anticipate that available cash and cash provided by operating activities will
be adequate to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve
months.

We expect fiscal 2003 capital expenditures will total approximately $2.0
million, primarily for test equipment, building improvements and internal use
software. Decisions related to how much cash is used for investing are
influenced by the expected amount of cash to be provided by operations.

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices

We believe that inflation and/or deflation had a minimal impact on our overall
operations during the three-year period ended December 31, 2002.

Seasonality

Sales typically increase in the second quarter and peak in the third quarter
driven by increased holiday demand from our customers in the home
entertainment and consumer products markets. Our revenues are generally lower
in the first and fourth quarters compared to the rest of the year. We believe
that this historical seasonal trend could be impacted by general economic
conditions and reduction in sales of our previously de-emphasized products.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In accordance with the early adoption provisions of SOP 90-7, on May 1, 2002,
we adopted the following Statements of Financial Accounting Standards: SFAS No.
143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations;" SFAS No. 145, "Rescission
of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and
Technical Corrections Business Combinations; and SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." We adopted SFAS No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," on January 1, 2002. The adoption of
these statements had no material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

The principal provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that goodwill and other
intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life not be amortized
but rather tested annually for impairment. Under SFAS No. 142, intangible
assets that have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their
useful lives. SFAS No. 142 requires companies to test intangible assets that
will not be amortized for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair
value of those assets to their recorded amounts.

The principal provisions of SFAS No. 143 address financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long-lived assets and for the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143
requires an enterprise to record the fair value of an asset retirement
obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from
the acquisition, construction, development and or normal use of the assets.
The enterprise also is to record a corresponding increase to the carrying
amount of the related long-lived asset (i.e., the associated asset retirement
costs) and to depreciate that cost over the life of the asset. The liability
is changed at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time (i.e.,
accretion expense) and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying
the initial fair value measurement.

SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from
Extinguishment of Debt, and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64,
Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." SFAS No.
145 also rescinds SFAS No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor
Carriers," and amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an
inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions
and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic
effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 also
amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical
corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed
conditions.

SFAS No. 146 revises the accounting for specified employee and contract
terminations that are part of restructuring activities. Companies will be able
to record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity
only when the liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value.
Commitment to an exit plan or a plan of disposal expresses only management's
intended future actions and therefore, does not meet the requirement for
recognizing a liability and related expense. This statement only applies to
termination benefits offered for a specific termination event or a specified
period. It will not affect accounting for the costs to terminate a capital
lease. We adopted this statement for exit or disposal activities initiatedon
or after May 1, 2002.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others", which clarifies disclosure and
recognition/measurement requirements related to certain guarantees. The
disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements issued after
December 15, 2002 and the recognition/measurement requirements are effective
on a prospective basis for guarantees issued or modified after December 31,
2002. The application of the requirements of FIN 45 did not have a material
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure". SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123,
to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123
to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial
statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The
transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim
disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial
statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. As the
Company did not make a voluntary change to the fair value based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation in 2002, the adoption of SFAS
No. 148 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and
results of operations.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which
addresses consolidation by a business of variable interest entities in which
it is the primary beneficiary. The Interpretation is effective immediately for
certain disclosure requirements and variable interest entities created after
January 31, 2003, and in fiscal 2004 for all other variable interest entities.
The Company is reviewing the provisions of the Interpretation and complies
with the disclosure requirements, but does not expect the Interpretation to
have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Effective prospectively for arrangements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003, Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue
00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables," addresses the
accounting, by a vendor, for contractual arrangements in which multiple
revenue-generating activities will be performed by the vendor. In some
situations, the different revenue-generating activities (deliverables) are
sufficiently separable and there exists sufficient evidence of fair values to
account separately for the different deliverables (that is, there are separate
units of accounting). In other situations, some or all of the different
deliverables are interrelated closely or there is not sufficient evidence of
fair value to account separately for the different deliverables. EITF Issue
00-21 addresses when and, if so, how an arrangement involving multiple
deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. The Company
has not yet determined the impact of the adoption of EITF Issue 00-21 on its
consolidated financial statements


                                 RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors should be considered carefully in addition to the
other information in this report. If any of these risks actually occurs, our
business could be harmed materially.

                      Risks Related to the Restructuring

We recently effectuated a reorganization pursuant to a prepackaged plan under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which does not assure our
continued success.

On February 28, 2002, we filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California confirmed our prepackaged plan
of reorganization on April 30, 2002 and we emerged from bankruptcy on May 13,
2002. Pursuant to the financial restructuring, our formerly publicly traded
9.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2005, accrued interest related to such notes,
and all of our previously existing equity securities were canceled. Our
completion of bankruptcy proceedings does not assure our continued success.

Our new revolving credit facility restricts our ability to take certain
actions that we may determine to be in our best interests.

In connection with our reorganization, we replaced our previous credit
facility with a three-year $15.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility. Borrowings under this credit facility are secured by substantially
all of our assets. This facility places various restrictions on us, including,
but not limited to, restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness and
engage in certain corporate transactions, and requires us to maintain
financial ratios. As of December 31, 2002, we had no additional borrowing
capacity under this facility. This credit facility is scheduled to mature on
May 13, 2004, at which time we may be required to renew, refinance, or modify
the credit facility with our lender or locate alternative financing. These
restrictions and provisions could have an adverse impact on our future
liquidity and ability to implement our business plan.

Our reorganization may have negatively affected some of our relationships with
our customers, suppliers and employees.

The effect, if any, of our Chapter 11 case and plan of reorganization may have
had, and may continue to have, upon our continued operations cannot be
predicted or quantified. Some entities may be uncomfortable doing business
with a company that has recently emerged from bankruptcy. Our Chapter 11 case
could adversely affect our relationships with our customers, suppliers and
employees.

As a result of the adoption of "fresh-start" accounting, you will not be able
to directly compare our historical financial statements with our 2002
financial results disclosed in this annual report.

As a result of the consummation of our plan of reorganization and the
resulting accounting transactions required to revalue the company, we are
operating our business under a new capital structure. In addition, we adopted
fresh-start reporting in accordance with the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7 upon emerging from bankruptcy.
Because SOP 90-7 requires us to reset our assets and liabilities to current
fair values, our financial condition and results of operations disclosed in
periods subsequent to April 30, 2002 will not be directly comparable to the
financial condition or results of operations reflected in our financial
statements for periods prior to May 1, 2002.

                   Risk Related to Our Business and Industry

Our quarterly operating results are likely to fluctuate and may fail to meet
expectations, which may cause the price of our securities to decline.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and will likely
continue to fluctuate in the future. Our future operating results will depend
on a variety of factors and they may fail to meet expectations. Any failure to
meet expectations could cause the price of our securities to fluctuate or
decline significantly. In addition, high proportions of our costs are fixed,
due in part to our significant sales, research and development and
manufacturing costs. Therefore, small declines in revenue could
disproportionately affect our operating results in a quarter. A variety of
factors could cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate, including:

      o  our ability to introduce and sell new products and technologies on a
         timely basis;

      o  any shortage of wafer or assembly manufacturing capacity at our
         third-party vendors;

      o  changes in the prices of our products;

      o  technological change and product obsolescence;

      o  changes in product mix or fluctuations in manufacturing yields;

      o  variability of our customers' product life cycles;

      o  the level of orders that we receive and can ship in a quarter,
         customer order patterns and seasonality;

      o  increases in the cost or availability of raw materials; and

      o  gain or loss of significant customers.

We are currently experiencing a downturn in the business cycle and our
revenues, cash generation and profitability are being adversely affected.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has experienced significant
economic downturns at various times in the last three decades, characterized
by diminished product demand, erosion of average selling prices and production
over-capacity. During 2000, another downturn in our business cycle began and
seems to be continuing today. The terrorist acts of September 2001 in New York
City, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania, and the United States' military
response, have exacerbated the downturn and created an uncertain economic
environment. We cannot predict the impact of these events, any subsequent
terrorist acts or of any related military action, on our customers or
business. We believe that, in light of these events, some of our customers
have curtailed and may in the future delay or further curtail spending on
technology, which could also negatively affect our quarterly results or
financial condition in the future.

We are experiencing a decline in net sales, as a result of a continuing
reduction in customer order levels that began in the fourth quarter of 2000.
This decline in net sales has been accentuated by decisions made in 1999 and
2000 to sell, disengage, or de-emphasize certain product offerings in the
military, television, and PC peripheral markets. We are uncertain how long
this economic downturn will last. Additionally, we may be required to reduce
selling prices in response to competition, which could lower our gross margin.
Such a decline in selling prices would have a negative impact on our financial
condition. As a result of our under-utilization of our manufacturing capacity,
in January 2002 we closed one of our two wafer fabrication facilities. We are
currently, and will likely in the future experience substantial
period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results that are
attributable to general industry conditions or events occurring in the general
economy. Any economic downturn could pressure us to reduce our prices and
decrease our revenues, cash generation and profitability.

We have a history of losses, and we may not be profitable in the future.

We have a history of losses for each year in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2002, excluding the favorable accounting effects of our
reorganization. If our new business plan is not successful, we may not be
profitable in the future.

We have implemented significant cost cutting measures, and we may be required
to implement additional cost cutting measures depending upon our future
revenues and operating results.

Similar to other semiconductor companies, we have implemented significant cost
cutting measures in the past. These cost cutting efforts have included:


      o  restructuring our manufacturing operations, which included
         consolidating our wafer fabricating facilities, outsourcing
         significant wafer and assembly operations and consolidating probe and
         final test operations at our Philippines site;

      o  refocusing of strategic priorities;

      o  reallocating personnel and responsibilities to better utilize human
         resources;

      o  reducing research and development and capital expenditure spending;

      o  reducing our workforce; and

      o  instituting temporary office and facility shutdowns.

Cost cutting measures may not increase our efficiency or future profitability
and our reduction in research and development spending could harm our ability
to introduce new products in the future. If our revenue or operating results
significantly decline in the future, we may be required to institute further
cost reduction measures.

If we are unable to implement our business strategy, our revenues and future
profitability may be harmed materially.

Our future financial performance and success are largely dependent on our
ability to implement our business strategy. Beginning in third quarter of 2001
we revised our business strategy to refocus on our core 8-bit micrologic
business and to increase our use of external wafer fabrication facilities. We
may be unable to implement this new business strategy, including planning for
and responding to lack of external wafer fabrication capacity and dealing with
unforeseen quality issues, and, even if we do implement our strategy
successfully, our results of operations may fail to improve.

In addition, although the semiconductor micrologic market has grown in prior
years, it is currently in a significant downturn. Our revenues and future
profitability could be harmed seriously. It is uncertain for how long this
slowdown will last.

We may not be able to introduce and sell new products, and our inability to do
so may harm our business materially.

Our operating results depend on our ability to introduce and sell new
products. Rapidly changing technologies and industry standards, along with
frequent new product introductions, characterize the industries that are
currently the primary end-users of semiconductors. As these industries evolve
and introduce new products, our success will depend on our ability to adapt to
such changes in a timely and cost-effective manner by designing, developing,
manufacturing, marketing and providing customer support for new products and
technologies.

Our ability to introduce new products successfully depends on several factors,
including:

      o  development of support tools and collateral literature that make
         complex products easy for engineers to understand and use;

      o  proper new product selection;

      o  timely completion and introduction of new product designs;

      o  support from foundry services;

      o  complexity of the new products to be designed and manufactured; and

      o  market acceptance of our products and our customers' products.

We cannot assure you that the design and introduction schedules for any new
products or any additions or modifications to our existing products will be
met, that these products will achieve market acceptance or that we will be
able to sell these products at prices that are favorable to us.

Acts of war or terrorism could harm our business.

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States created
immediate significant economic and political uncertainty. The long-term
effects of such attacks on the world economy and our business are unknown, but
could be material to our business. Further terrorists acts, whether in the
United States or abroad, or acts of war, in Iraq or elsewhere, also could
cause damage or disruption to our business, our suppliers, or customers, or
our customers, or could create political or economic instability, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business. Escalated tensions
between India and Pakistan particularly pose an increased risk to our design
operations in India, which could be disrupted in the event of the outbreak of
war between the two countries.

Our industry is highly competitive and we cannot assure you that we will be
able to compete effectively.

The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by
price erosion, rapid technological change and heightened competition in many
markets. The industry consists of major domestic and international
semiconductor companies, many of which have substantially greater financial
and other resources than we do with which to pursue engineering,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products. Emerging
companies are also increasing their participation in the semiconductor
industry. Our current and future products compete with, or may compete with,
products offered by Advanced Micro Devices, ARM, Atmel, Conexant, Intel,
Lucent Technologies, Microchip, Motorola, NEC, Philips, Sharp, ST
Microelectronics, Texas Instruments and Toshiba, among others. Some of our
principal products such as the Z80 microprocessor are licensed by our
competitors or are in the public domain and can be manufactured and sold to
our customers by our competitors, possibly with added features or at lower
prices than we charge. Our ability to compete successfully in our markets
depends on factors both within and outside of our control, including:


      o  our ability to design and manufacture new products that implement new
         technologies, including our eZ80 and Z8 product families;

      o  our ability to protect our products by effectively utilizing
         intellectual property laws;

      o  our product quality, reliability, ease of use and price;

      o  the diversity of product line and our efficiency of production;

      o  the pace at which customers incorporate our devices into their
         products; and

      o  the success of our competitors' products and general economic
         conditions.

To the extent that our products achieve market acceptance, competitors
typically seek to offer competitive products or embark on pricing strategies,
which, if successful, could harm our results of operations and financial
condition materially.

Unless we maintain manufacturing efficiency and avoid manufacturing
difficulties, our future profitability could be harmed.

Our semiconductors are highly complex to manufacture and our production yields
are sensitive. Our production yields may be inadequate in the future to meet
our customers' demands. Production yields are sensitive to a wide variety of
factors, including the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment,
impurities in the materials used and the performance of personnel and
equipment. From time to time, we have experienced difficulties in effecting
transitions to new manufacturing processes and have suffered delays in product
deliveries or reduced yields. We may experience similar difficulties or suffer
similar delays in the future, and our operating results could be harmed as a
result.

For example, we may experience problems that make it difficult to manufacture
the quantities of our products that we anticipate producing in our wafer
fabrication facility. These difficulties may include:

      o  equipment not performing as expected;

      o  process technology changes not operating as expected; and

      o  production personnel not operating equipment as expected.

If we are unable to obtain adequate production capacity, our business will be
harmed.

We rely on independent third-party foundry manufacturers to fabricate an
increasing percentage of our products. Industry-wide shortages in foundry
capacity could harm our financial results. For example, a significant amount
of our sales are of products which cannot be manufactured at our Nampa, Idaho
wafer fabrication facility. Should we be unable to obtain the requisite
foundry capacity to manufacture our complex new products, or should we have to
pay high prices to foundries in periods of tight capacity, our ability to
increase our revenues might be impaired. Any delay in initiating production at
third-party facilities, any inability to have new products manufactured at
foundries or any failure to meet our customers' demands could damage our
relationships with our customers and may decrease our sales.

Other significant risks associated with relying on these third-party
manufacturers include:

      o  reduced control over the cost of our products, delivery schedules and
         product quality;

      o  the warranties on wafers or products supplied to us are limited;

      o  increased exposure to potential misappropriation of our intellectual
         property; and

      o  the cost and consumption of time associated with switching foundries.

We depend on third-party assemblers and the failure of these third parties to
continue to provide services to us on sufficiently favorable terms could harm
our business.

We use outside contract assemblers for packaging our products. If we are
unable to obtain additional assembly capacity on sufficiently favorable terms,
our ability to achieve continued revenue growth might be impaired. Shortages
in contract assembly capacity could cause shortages in our products and could
also result in the loss of customers. Because we rely on these third parties,
we also have less control over our costs, delivery schedules and quality of
our products and our intellectual property is at greater risk of
misappropriation.

Our international operations subject us to risks inherent in doing business in
foreign countries that could impair our results of operations.

Approximately 56% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 and
65% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2001 were to foreign
customers and we expect that international sales will continue to represent a
significant portion of our net sales in the future. We maintain significant
operations or rely on a number of contract manufacturers in the Philippines,
Indonesia, Taiwan and India. We cannot assure you that we will be successful
in overcoming the risks that relate to or arise from operating in
international markets. Risks inherent in doing business on an international
level include:

      o  economic and political instability;

      o  changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs, customs, duties and other
         trade barriers;

      o  transportation delays;

      o  power supply shortages and shutdowns;

      o  difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations and other
         labor problems;

      o  existence of language barriers and cultural distinctions;

      o  acts of God, including floods, typhoons and earthquakes;

      o  taxation of our earnings and the earnings of our personnel; and

      o  other uncertainties relating to the administration of, or changes in,
         or new interpretation of, the laws, regulations and policies of the
         jurisdictions in which we conduct our business.

In addition, our activities outside the United States are subject to risks
associated with fluctuating currency values and exchange rates, hard currency
shortages and controls on currency exchange. While our sales are primarily
denominated in U.S. dollars, worldwide semiconductor pricing is influenced by
currency rate fluctuations, and such fluctuations could harm our operating
results materially.

The risks inherent in our international operations have been increased by the
terrorist attacks of September 2001. These attacks, coupled with the
international military response, have created an uncertain economic
environment and we cannot predict the impact of these events, any subsequent
terrorist acts or of any related military action, on our customers or our
business.

The lease of the facility housing our Philippines operations expires in March
2004; if we are unable to negotiate an extension of this lease or relocate
these operations on commercially reasonable terms, our results of operations
could be harmed.

The majority of our final product testing, inventory warehousing and logistics
operations reside in a 54,000 square foot facility located in the Philippines.
We have occupied this site with inexpensive rental payments since 1979 and the
lease is presently due to expire on March 31, 2004. Accordingly, if we are
unable to negotiate an extension of the lease or effectively relocate these
operations to another site on commercially reasonable terms, our results of
operations could be harmed.

We have changed our North American distributors, and we may lose some of our
customers as a result.

In September 2002, we announced our intention to terminate our existing
relationship with our Pioneer Standard, our full-service distributor in North
America. We completed the termination of our relationship with Pioneer
Standard in the fourth quarter of 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2002,
Pioneer Standard purchased approximately $17.9 million of our products. In
their place, we have franchised Future Electronics as our sole exclusive
full-service distributor in North America. For the three months ended December
31, 2002, Future Electronics purchased approximately $5.3 million of our
products. We expect that Future Electronics will take over the majority of the
business that we previously conducted with Pioneer Standard, but this
transition may not occur smoothly. Pioneer Standard may try to direct their
customers to purchase competing products instead of ours. Other customers may
not wish to transfer their business to Future Electronics. As a result, we may
lose some of the business that we used to sell through our prior distributor,
which could harm our operating results materially. Future Electronics also
distributes products of our competitors that may directly compete with our
product offerings. If Future electronics chooses to promote those products
over our products, our operating results could be harmed significantly. In
addition, if Future Electronics were to terminate our distribution agreement,
we could experience a period of significant interruption of our business while
we obtained other distribution channels.

A significant amount of our revenues comes from relatively few of our
customers and distributors, and any decrease of revenues from these customers
and distributors, or the loss of their business, could significantly harm our
financial results.

Historically we have been, and we expect to continue to be, dependent on a
relatively small number of customers and distributors for a significant
portion of our revenues. We depend on third-party distributors to market and
sell our products and these third-party distributors accounted for
approximately 40% of our sales in 2000 and 39% of our sales in 2001, and 44%
of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002. Our distributors may
not continue to effectively market, sell or support our products. Our ten
largest customers, including our distributors, accounted for approximately 49%
of our net sales in 2000, 55% of our net sales in 2001 and 54% for the year
ended December 31, 2002. Arrow Electronics accounted for approximately 13% of
our net sales in 1999 and Pioneer-Standard accounted for approximately 12% of
our net sales in 2000, 13% of our net sales in 2001 and 14% of our net sales
for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Concentration of revenue to
particular customers may change from period to period, but we expect that
sales to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a
significant percentage of our revenues in any particular period for the
foreseeable future. The loss of one or more major customers or any reduction,
delay or cancellation of orders by any of these customers or our failure to
market successfully to new customers could harm our business materially.

We have very few long-term contracts with our customers and, like us, our
customers typically compete in cyclical industries. In the future, these
customers may decide not to purchase our products at all, to purchase fewer
products than they did in the past, or to alter their purchasing patterns,
particularly because substantially all of our sales are made on a purchase
order or sales order acknowledgment basis, which permits our customers to
cancel, change or delay product purchase commitments upon 30 days notice for
standard products and 60 days notice for custom products. Customers may still
cancel or reschedule within these time periods, however they routinely incur a
cancellation or rescheduling charge. This risk is increased because our
customers can purchase some similar products from our competitors.

Changes in technologies or consumption patterns could reduce the demand for
our products

As a result of technological changes, from time to time our customers design
our product out of some devices. Any resulting decreased sales could reduce
our profitability. For example, in 1999 and 2000, a number of our customers
changed the designs of computer mouse pointing devices that they manufacture,
and as a result, these devices no longer contain our products. Because we do
not have long-term supply contracts with most of our customers, changes in the
designs of their products can have sudden and significant impacts on our
sales. For example, net sales of our computer mouse pointing devices and other
computer peripheral products decreased substantially from approximately $15.4
million in 2000 to approximately $4.9 million in 2001, and to approximately
$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. These reduced sales due to
design changes have harmed us in the past and additional design changes could
harm our operating results in the future.

We depend on key personnel, and the loss of our current personnel or our
failure to hire and retain additional personnel could affect our business
negatively.

We depend on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical and
managerial personnel. We believe that our future success in developing
marketable products and achieving a competitive position will depend in large
part on our ability to identify, recruit, hire, train, retain and motivate
highly skilled technical, executive, managerial, marketing and customer
service personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense, especially in
Northern California, where our headquarters are located, and we may not be
able to successfully recruit, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified
personnel. Our failure to recruit and retain necessary technical, executive,
managerial, merchandising, marketing and customer service personnel could harm
our business and our ability to obtain new customers and develop new products.
In addition, our current financial condition could have a negative impact on
our ability to recruit and retain employees.

In January 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with James M.
Thorburn, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which we will
make grants of restricted stock on each of May 13, 2003, May 13, 2004 and May
13, 2005. We intended to loan Mr. Thorburn the funds to pay the income taxes
due with respect to these grants, as we have done with other employees that
received grants of restricted stock. In July 2002, however, Congress enacted
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which prohibits these loans. As a result of
this development, we will need to revisit the terms of our employment
arrangement with Mr. Thorburn, and we may not be able to reach an agreement
acceptable to both parties.

We may fail to protect our proprietary rights and the cost of protecting those
rights, whether we are successful or not, may harm our ability to compete.

The measures we take to protect our intellectual property rights may be
inadequate to protect our proprietary technologies and processes from
misappropriation, and these measures may not prevent independent third party
development of competitive products. We may not be able to detect the
unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual
property rights. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights in both
the United States and in foreign countries, existing intellectual property
laws in the United States provide only limited protection and, in some cases,
the laws of foreign countries provide even less protection.

Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of
our proprietary rights or the proprietary rights of others. Any such
litigation could require us to incur substantial costs and divert significant
valuable resources, including the efforts of our technical and management
personnel, which may harm our business materially.

We could be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual
property rights, which could be time-consuming and expensive for us to defend.

The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims and related
litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Third
parties may assert claims or initiate litigation against us, our licensors,
our foundries, our service providers, or our customers with respect to
existing or future products. Any intellectual property litigation initiated
against us could subject us to significant liability for damages and
attorneys' fees, invalidation of our proprietary rights, injunctions or other
court orders that could prevent us from using specific technologies or
engaging in specific business activities. These lawsuits, regardless of their
success, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would
divert management's time and attention from our business. Any potential
intellectual property litigation could also force us to do one or more of the
following:

      o  pay substantial damages;

      o  cease using key aspects of our technologies or processes that
         incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

      o  cease the manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale and importation of
         infringing products;

      o  alter our designs around a third party's patent;

      o  obtain licenses to use the technology that is the subject of the
         litigation from a third party;

      o  expend significant resources to develop or obtain non-infringing
         technology;

      o  create new brands for our services and establish recognition of these
         new brands; or

      o  make significant changes to the structure and the operation of our
         business.

Implementation of any of these alternatives could be costly and time-consuming
and might not be possible at all. An adverse determination in any litigation
to which we were a party could harm our business, our results of operations
and financial condition. In addition, we may not be able to develop or acquire
the technologies we need, and licenses to such technologies, if available, may
not be obtainable on commercially reasonable terms. Any necessary development
or acquisition could require us to expend substantial time and other
resources.

If an infringement against us is successful and we are unable to license the
infringed technology, our business and operating results would be harmed
significantly.

We may engage in acquisitions that could adversely affect our operating
results, dilute our stockholders' equity, or cause us to incur additional debt
or assume contingent liabilities.

To grow our business and maintain our competitive position, we have made
acquisitions in the past and may do so in the future. For example, in April
1999, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed the operating
liabilities of Seattle Silicon Corporation and in July 2000, we acquired
Calibre, Inc.

Acquisitions involve a number of risks that could harm our business and result
in the acquired business not performing as expected, including:

      o  insufficient experience with technologies and markets in which the
         acquired business is involved that may be necessary to successfully
         operate and integrate the business;

      o  problems integrating the acquired operations, personnel, technologies
         or products with the existing business and products;

      o  diversion of management time and attention from our core business and
         to the acquired business;

      o  potential failure to retain key technical, management, sales and other
         personnel of the acquired business;

      o  difficulties in retaining relationships with suppliers and customers
         of the acquired business; and

      o  acquired assets, including intangible assets, may subsequently become
         impaired.

In addition, acquisitions could require investment of significant financial
resources and may require us to obtain additional equity financing, which may
dilute our stockholders' equity, or to incur additional indebtedness.

Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. These accounting principles are
subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities and
Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to interpret and create
appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies or interpretations
could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could
affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a
change. For example, while current accounting rules allow us to exclude the
expense of stock options from our financial statements, influential business
policy groups have suggested that the rules be changed to require these
options to be expensed. Technology companies generally, and our company,
specifically, rely heavily on stock options as a major component of our
employee compensation packages. If we are required to expense options, we may
be less likely to achieve profitability or we may have to decrease or
eliminate options grants. Decreasing or eliminating option grants may
negatively impact our ability to attract and retain qualified employees.

We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations and our
failure to comply with present or future laws and regulations could harm our
business materially.

Our manufacturing processes require us to use various hazardous substances
and, as a result, we are subject to a variety of governmental laws and
regulations related to the storage, use, emission, discharge and disposal of
such substances. Specifically, the existing process of manufacturing silicon
wafers is based on use of large amounts of corrosive chemicals and huge
quantities of distilled, de-ionized water. Our failure to comply with present
or future laws and regulations or the loss of any permit required to conduct
our business could result in fines being imposed on us, the limitation or
suspension of production or cessation of our operations. Compliance with any
future environmental laws and regulations could require us to acquire
additional equipment or to incur substantial other expenses. Any failure by us
to control the use of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous
materials could subject us to future liabilities that could materially harm
our business. In addition, we may be required to incur significant expense in
connection with governmental investigations and/or environmental employee
health and safety matters.

Recently enacted and proposed changes in securities laws and regulations are
likely to increase our costs.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that became law in July 2002 requires changes
in some of our corporate governance practices. The Act also requires the
Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate new rules on a variety of
subjects. In addition to final rules and rule proposals already made by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, NASDAQ has proposed revisions to its
requirements for companies that are OTCBB-listed. We expect these new rules
and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, and to
make some activities more difficult, time consuming and/or costly. We also
expect these new rules and regulations to make it more expensive for us to
obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to
accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain
coverage. These new rules and regulations could also make it more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors,
particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive
officers.


Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

The agreements governing our indebtedness may limit our ability to finance
future operations or capital needs or engage in business activities that may
be in our interest.

The terms of our credit facility contain restrictive covenants that may impair
our ability to take corporate actions that we believe to be in the best
interests of our stockholders, including restricting our ability to:

      o  dispose of assets;

      o  incur additional indebtedness;

      o  prepay other indebtedness or amend some debt instruments;

      o  pay dividends or repurchase our stock;

      o  create liens on assets;

      o  enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

      o  make investments, loans or advances;

      o  make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations;

      o  change the business conducted by us or our subsidiaries;

      o  make capital expenditures or engage in specific transactions with
         affiliates; and

      o  otherwise restrict other corporate activities.

Our ability to comply with these borrowing terms may be affected by events
beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry
conditions. The breach of any of such covenants or restrictions could result
in a default, which would permit our lender to cause all amounts we owe them
to accelerate and become due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid
interest. We may not be able to repay all of our borrowings if they are
accelerated and, in such event, our business may be harmed materially and the
value of our common stock and debt securities could decrease significantly.


ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
our short-term investment portfolio and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. We do not use derivative financial investments in our investment
portfolio. Our primary investment objectives are to preserve capital and
maintain liquidity. These objectives are met by investing in high-quality
credit issuances and limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one
company. Our policy is to mitigate default risk by investing in only the
highest quality securities and monitoring the credit ratings of such
investments. As of December 31, 2002, our cash equivalents were invested in
bank time deposits and money market funds. We have no significant cash flow
exposure due to rate changes for our cash equivalents, as these instruments
are short-term.

The table below presents principal amounts and related interest rates for our
cash equivalents and our revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2002
(dollars in millions):




                                           Carrying Value      Fair Value
                                           --------------      ----------
 Cash Equivalents:
      Fixed rate                            $    26.7           $  26.7
      Average interest rate                       0.91%              --
 Short-Term Debt:
      Variable-rate revolving debt          $     6.9           $   6.9
      Interest rate                               4.43%              --

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We transact business in various foreign
countries, but the vast majority of our consolidated net sales and purchases
are denominated in U.S. dollars. Currently, we do not employ a foreign
currency hedging program to mitigate our foreign currency exchange risk as
foreign currency transactions and we believe the risks to date have not been
significant. We maintain local currency bank accounts in our international
offices to facilitate payment of local operating costs.

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      The following financial statements and supplementary data are provided
         herein:



  Independent Auditors' Report                                        pg. 50

  Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors                   pg. 51

  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002,
  and December 31, 2001                                               pg. 52

  Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Eight Months Ended
  December 31, 2002, Four Months Ended April 30, 2002,
  and for the Years December 31, 2001 and 2000                        pg. 53

  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Eight Months Ended
  December 31, 2002, Four Months Ended April 30, 2002,
  and for the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000                  pg. 54

  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
  (Deficiency) for the Eight Months Ended December 31,
  2002, Four Months Ended April 30, 2002
  and for the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000                  pg. 55

  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                          pg. 56



<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of ZiLOG, Inc.

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ZiLOG,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2002 and December 31,
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the eight months ended December 31,
2002, the four months ended April 30, 2002, and the year ended December 31,
2001. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ZiLOG,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the eight months ended
December 31, 2002, the four months ended April 30, 2002, and the year ended
December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.

      As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets".

      As discussed in Notes 1, 2, and 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company's plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code became effective on May 13, 2002; however, for
financial reporting purposes, the effective date of the reorganization is
considered to be April 30, 2002. As a result of the adoption of "fresh-start"
reporting in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting
by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code," the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the eight months ended December 31, 2002
are presented on a different reporting basis than the periods before the
emergence from bankruptcy, and are therefore not comparable.


                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
February 3, 2003






<PAGE>



REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ZiLOG, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ZiLOG, Inc. as
of December 31, 2000 (not separately presented herein) and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency and cash flows
for the year then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement
schedule for the year ended December 31, 2000 listed in the index at Item
15(a). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ZiLOG, Inc. at
December 31, 2000, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash
flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, during
the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company changed its accounting method
for recognizing revenue on shipments to its distributors.

                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
January 26, 2001

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  ZiLOG, Inc.
                          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                      (in millions, except per share data)

                                                                         Successor         Predecessor
                                                                          Company            Company
                                                                      -----------------------------------
                                                                       Dec. 31, 2002       Dec. 31, 2001
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
<S>                                                                    <C>                   <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents........................................  $      29.4           $     30.7
    Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.5         10.8
       at December 31, 2002 and $0.7 at December 31, 2001............                              16.7
    Inventories......................................................         10.6                 17.3
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets........................          3.4                  3.9
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
         Total current assets........................................         54.2                 68.6
                                                                      ================   ================
MOD III, Inc. assets held for sale...................................         30.0                   --

Property, plant and equipment, net...................................         21.9                 45.8

Goodwill.............................................................         34.6                   --
Intangible assets, net...............................................         18.3                   --

Other assets.........................................................          9.8                  1.3
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
                                                                       $     168.8           $    115.7
                                                                      ================   ================

Current liabilities:
   Short-term debt...................................................  $       6.9           $     12.8
   Notes payable.....................................................          --                 302.5
   Accounts payable..................................................         10.2                 13.4
   Accrued and other current  liabilities............................         18.0                 46.8
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
     Total current liabilities.......................................         35.1                375.5
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------

Deferred income taxes................................................         22.4                   --
Other long-term liabilities..........................................         14.5                 14.3
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
     Total liabilities...............................................         72.0                389.8
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------

Commitments and contingencies

Minority interest in MOD III assets..................................         30.0                   --
Stockholders' equity (deficiency):
   Preferred stock...................................................           --                 25.0

   Common stock,  $0.01 par value; 40.0 shares authorized; 29.8 and
     32.0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001,
     respectively.....................................................         0.3                  0.4
   Deferred stock compensation........................................        (4.6)                (0.6)
   Additional paid-in capital.........................................        97.1                 13.2
   Accumulated deficit................................................       (26.0)              (312.1)
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
     Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)..........................        66.8               (274.1)
                                                                      ----------------   ----------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................ $     168.8           $    115.7
                                                                      ================   ================

        See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  ZiLOG, Inc.
                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                      (in millions except per share data)

                                                Successor
                                                 Company                                    Predecessor Company
                                              ---------------- -----------------------------------------------------
                                                Eight Months      Four Months
                                                    Ended            Ended                Years Ended December 31,
                                              ---------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                                              Dec. 31, 2002      April 30, 2002           2001               2000
                                              -------------      --------------        --------           --------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>                  <C>                <C>
Net sales.....................................  $   93.6          $   46.0             $  172.3           $  239.2
Cost of sales.................................      51.2              26.1                130.1              151.7
Cost of sales - fresh-start
 inventory adjustment..............                  3.9                --                   --                 --
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Gross margin..................................      38.5              19.9                 42.2               87.5
Operating expenses:
   Research and development ..................      11.1               6.8                 28.7               36.9
   Selling, general and administrative .......      22.6              10.8                 46.1               54.5
   Special charges and reorganization items...       2.8               6.9                 54.3               17.5
   Amortization of intangible assets..........       7.9                --                   --                 --
   In-process research and development........      18.7                --                   --                 --
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
        Total operating expenses..............      63.1              24.5                129.1              108.9
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Operating loss................................     (24.6)             (4.6)               (86.9)             (21.4)
Other income (expense):
   Fresh-start adjustments....................        --              83.7                   --                 --
   Net gain on discharge of debt..............        --             205.7                   --                 --
   Interest income............................       0.2               0.1                  1.1                2.8
   Interest expense (1).......................      (0.5)             (5.0)               (33.7)             (29.1)
   Other, net.................................       0.5               0.1                 (0.8)              (0.8)
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
        Total other income (expense)..........       0.2             284.6                (33.4)             (27.1)
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Income (loss)
   before reorganization
   items, provision for
   income taxes, equity
   method investment
   loss and cumulative
   effect of change in
   accounting principle...................         (24.4)            280.0               (120.3)             (48.5)

Reorganization items..........................        --               4.0                   --                 --
Provision for income taxes....................       1.6               0.1                  0.5                0.3
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Income (loss) before
 equity method investment
 loss and cumulative effect
 of change in accounting principle............     (26.0)            275.9               (120.8)             (48.8)
Equity method investment loss.................        --                --                 (7.2)              (0.9)
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Income (loss) before
 cumulative effect of change
 in accounting principle.................          (26.0)            275.9               (128.0)             (49.7)
Cumulative effect of change
 in accounting principle...........                 --                  --                   --               (8.5)
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Net income (loss).............................     (26.0)            275.9               (128.0)             (58.2)
Preferred stock dividends accrued.............        --               1.9                  5.1                4.5
                                                -----------       -----------          --------           --------
Net income (loss)
 attributable to
 common stockholders.........                   $  (26.0)         $  274.0            $  (133.1)          $  (62.7)
                                                ===========       ===========          ========           ========
Basic and diluted net loss per share..........  $  (0.91)
                                                ===========
Weighted-average shares
 used in computing
 basic and diluted
   net loss per share .............                 28.6
                                                ===========

(1)   Excludes contractual interest of $4.2 in the four months ended April 30, 2002 not recorded during reorganization.

                                               See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           ZiLOG, Inc.
                                             CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                                            (in millions)

                                                Successor
                                                 Company                                    Predecessor Company
                                              ---------------- -----------------------------------------------------
                                                Eight Months      Four Months
                                                    Ended            Ended                Years Ended December 31,
                                              ---------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                                              Dec. 31, 2002      April 30, 2002           2001               2000
                                              -------------      --------------        --------           --------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>                  <C>                <C>


CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss).............................$     (26.0)        $     275.9        $ (128.0)         $  (58.2)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
 to net cash provided (used) by operating
 activities:
   Fresh-start in-process research
    and development...........................       18.7                  --              --                --
   Net gain on discharge of debt..............         --              (205.7)             --                --
   Fresh-start non-cash adjustments...........       (4.2)              (83.7)             --                --
   Cumulative change in
    accounting principle......................         --                  --              --               8.5
   Loss from equity method investment.........         --                  --             7.2               0.9
   Loss on sale of fixed assets...............        0.1                 0.0             0.7               0.1
   Depreciation and amortization..............       12.3                 2.5            37.9              41.9
   Asset impairments..........................         --                 2.7            36.9               9.3
   Stock-based compensation...................        2.9                 0.1             1.9               2.6
   Charge for purchased
    in-process research
    and development...................                 --                  --              --               1.5
   Accrued interest on notes payable..........         --                  --            13.6                --
Changes in operating assets
  and liabilities:
   Accounts receivable........................        3.7                 2.1            12.7               3.1
   Inventories................................        3.9                 2.9            10.2               1.5
   Prepaid expenses
    and other current
    and non-current assets..................         (8.5)                0.1            12.5               2.1
   Accounts payable...........................       (1.8)               (0.1)           (3.0)             (6.0)
   Accrued and other
    current liabilities.......................       13.4                (2.0)          (21.4)              1.2
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
      Net cash provided
      (used) by operations
       before reorganization items......             14.5                (5.2)          (18.8)              8.5
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
Reorganization items -
 professional fees
 paid (See Note 2)......................               --                (2.3)             --                --
      Net cash provided
      (used) by operating
       activities.......................             14.5                (7.5)          (18.8)              8.5
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
   Capital expenditures.................             (1.3)               (1.0)           (4.1)            (21.9)
   Business acquisitions................               --                   --              --              (8.4)
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
      Cash used by investing activities.             (1.3)               (1.0)           (4.1)            (30.3)
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   Proceeds from (repayments of)
    short-term debt.....................             (2.5)               (3.4)           12.8                --
   Proceeds from sales (redemptions) of
    common stock, net of repurchases....             (0.1)                 --             0.1               2.6
   Principle payments under capital
    leases..............................               --                  --              --              (0.9)
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
        Cash provided (used) by
         financing activities...........             (2.6)               (3.4)           12.9               1.7
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
Increase (decrease) in cash
 and cash equivalents...................             10.6               (11.9)          (10.0)            (20.1)
Cash and cash equivalents
 at beginning of period.................      $      18.8                30.7            40.7              60.8
                                                -----------         -----------        --------           --------
Cash and cash equivalents
 at end of period.......................      $      29.4                18.8            30.7              40.7
                                                ===========         ===========        ========           ========

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
   Interest paid during the period......      $       0.4          $      0.5       $    14.4         $    26.9
   Income taxes paid
    during the period...................      $       0.3          $      0.1       $     0.5         $     0.2
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
OF NON-CASH INVESTING
AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
   Issuance of common stock in
    connection with Calibre,
    Inc. acquisition....................      $        --          $       --        $     --          $    4.3
   Preferred dividends accrued..........      $        --          $      1.9        $    5.1          $    4.5



        See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  ZiLOG, Inc.
         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
                             (dollars in millions)

                                                                                    Common Stock
                                                                                --------------------
                                       Preferred Stock    Common Stock Voting         Class A
                                      ----------------    -------------------   --------------------
                                      Shares    Amount      Shares     Amount     Shares     Amount
                                      ------    ------     --------    ------     ------     ------

Balance at December 1, 1999
<S>                                  <C>       <C>        <C>           <C>     <C>           <C>
(Predecessor) .....................  250,000   $  25.0    30,525,736    $0.3    10,000,000    $0.1

Issuance of Common Stock under
stock option plans.................     --        --         382,393     --         --         --
Sales of restricted stock..........     --        --         425,000     --         --         --
Issuance of common stock for
acquisition........................     --        --         629,666     --         --         --
Preferred dividends accrued........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Deferred stock compensation........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Stock option compensation..........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Net loss and comprehensive loss....     --        --          --         --         --         --
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2000
  (Predecessor)....................  250,000      25.0    31,962,845    0.3     10,000,000     0.1

Issuance of Common Stock under
stock option plans, net............     --        --          54,427     --         --         --
Preferred dividends accrued........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Stock option compensation..........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Net loss and comprehensive loss....     --        --          --         --         --         --
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2001
  (Predecessor)....................  250,000      25.0    32,017,272     0.3     10,000,000    0.1


Preferred dividend accrued.........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Net income and comprehensive
  income...........................     --        --          --         --         --         --


Issuance of new common stock ......     --        --      28,000,000     0.3       --         --

Reclassifications.................. (250,000)   (25.0)   (32,017,272)   (0.3)    (10,000,000) (0.1)
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at May 1, 2002 (Successor).     --        --      28,000,000     0.3        --         --

Proceeds from sales of common
stock,  net of repurchases.........     --        --          90,580     --         --         --
Deferred stock compensation........     --        --          --         --         --         --
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................     --        --          --         --         --         --
Issuances of restricted stock......     --        --       1,862,465     --         --         --
Restricted shares repurchased......     --        --        (156,500)    --         --         --

Net loss and comprehensive loss....     --        --          --         --         --         --
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at
 December 31, 2002 (Successor)          --     $  --      29,796,545    $0.3        --      $  --
                                     ================================================================
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

[Table Continued]

                                  ZiLOG, Inc.
         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
                             (dollars in millions)


                                        Deferred                    Retained       Total
                                     ------------    Additional     Earnings     Stockholders'
                                         Stock         Paid-in    (Accumulated     Equity
                                     Compensation     Capital      Deficit)    (Deficiency)
                                     ------------    ----------    -----------  ----------

Balance at December 1, 1999
<S>                                  <C>             <C>          <C>           <C>
(Predecessor) .....................  $    --         $   1.1      $ (116.3)     $   (89.8)

Issuance of Common Stock under
stock option plans.................       --             1.0          --              1.0
Sales of restricted stock..........       --             1.7          --              1.7
Issuance of common stock for
acquisition........................       --             4.3          --              4.3
Preferred dividends accrued........       --             --           (4.5)          (4.5)
Deferred stock compensation........       (2.2)          2.2          --              --
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................        0.3          (0.3)         --              --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................        0.4           --           --              0.4
Stock option compensation..........       --             2.2          --              2.2
Net loss and comprehensive loss....       --             --          (58.2)         (58.2)
                                     ------------    ----------    -----------  ----------

Balance at December 31, 2000
  (Predecessor)....................       (1.5)         12.2        (179.0)        (142.9)

Issuance of Common Stock under
stock option plans, net............       --             --           --              --
Preferred dividends accrued........       --             --           (5.1)          (5.1)
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................        0.7          (0.7)         --              --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................        0.2           --           --              0.2
Stock option compensation..........       --             1.7          --              1.7
Net loss and comprehensive loss....       --             --         (128.0)        (128.0)
                                     ------------    ----------    -----------  ----------
Balances at December 31, 2001
  (Predecessor)....................       (0.6)         13.2        (312.1)        (274.1)

Preferred dividends accrued........       --             --           (1.9)          (1.9)
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................        0.1           --           --              0.1
Net income and comprehensive
  income...........................       --             --          275.9          275.9

Issuance of new common stock ......       --            89.7          --             90.0

Reclassifications .................        0.5         (13.2)         38.1            --
                                     ------------    ----------    -----------  ----------

Balance at May 1, 2002 (Successor).       --            89.7          --             90.0

Proceeds from sales of common
stock,  net of repurchases.........       --             0.1          --              0.1
Deferred stock compensation........       (7.9)          7.9          --              --
Deferred stock compensation
cancellations......................        0.6          (0.6)         --              --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.......................        2.7           0.2          --              2.9
Issuances of restricted stock......       --             --           --              --
Restricted shares repurchased......       --            (0.2)         --             (0.2)

Net loss and comprehensive loss....       --             --          (26.0)         (26.0)
                                     ------------    ----------    -----------  ----------
Balances at
 December 31, 2002 Successor.......  $   ( 4.6)      $  97.1      $  (26.0)     $    66.8
                                     ============    ==========    ===========  ==========



                  See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1.    DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
           POLICIES

Nature of business: ZiLOG is a worldwide supplier of semiconductor products.
The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets various families of
products in support of the micrologic semiconductor market segment. Using
proprietary technology developed over its 27-year operating history, ZiLOG
continues to provide semiconductor devices that its customers design into
their end products. These devices typically combine a microprocessor and/or
digital signal processor, memory, and input and output functions on a single
device. ZiLOG's embedded control devices enable a broad range of consumer and
industrial electronics manufacturers to control the functions and performance
of their products. ZiLOG's standard products have a wide variety of uses
including the processing and transmission of information for data
communications, telecommunications and consumer electronics companies.

Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of ZiLOG, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant transactions and
accounts between the Company and these subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation.

The Company has incurred recurring operating losses and had a net capital
deficiency as of April 30, 2002. On February 28, 2002, ZiLOG filed and
received confirmation from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California of its and ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc.'s ("MOD III, Inc.")
joint reorganization plan (the "Reorganization Plan") filed pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Reorganization Plan
became effective on May 13, 2002. (See Note 2).

As a result of the courts confirmation of ZiLOG's Reorganization Plan, the
Company has been required to adjust its financial statements as prescribed by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
90-7, "Financial Reporting By Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code" (SOP 90-7). The reporting requirements of SOP 90-7 are referred to as
"fresh-start" reporting, which resulted in material changes to ZiLOG's
Consolidated Balance Sheet. This approach requires the recording of assets and
liabilities at fair values, the valuation of equity based on the
reorganization value of the ongoing business and the recording of intangible
assets including goodwill. (See Note 3).

Revenue recognition: Revenue from product sales to OEM customers is recognized
upon shipment net of appropriate allowances for returns and warranty costs
which are recorded at the time of shipment and represent the Company's only
post-sale obligations. As further explained in Note 4, commencing in 2000,
revenue on shipments to distributors who have rights of return and price
protection on unsold merchandise held by them, is deferred until products are
resold by the distributors to end users. Although revenue is deferred until
resale, title of products sold to distributors transfers upon shipment.
Accordingly, shipments to distributors are reflected in the consolidated
balance sheets as accounts receivable and a reduction of inventories at the
time of shipment. Deferred revenue and the corresponding cost of sales on
shipments to distributors are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet on a
net basis as "Deferred income on shipments to distributors." Prior to fiscal
2000, revenue on shipments to distributors having rights of return and price
protection on unsold merchandise held by them were recognized upon shipment to
the distributors, with appropriate provisions for reserves for returns and
allowances.

Through April 2001, the Company's terms of sale were FOB shipping point for
almost all of its OEM and distribution sales. Accordingly, at the time of
shipment, both title and risk of loss for the products transferred to the
customer and ZiLOG had an enforceable claim for collection from both its OEM
and distribution customers. In May 2001, the Company changed its terms of sale
for most shipments to FOB destination point. The Company recognizes revenue on
FOB destination shipments to OEM customers when the customer receives the
products.

Foreign currency translation: All of the Company's subsidiaries use the U.S.
dollar as the functional currency. Accordingly, monetary accounts and
transactions are remeasured at current exchange rates, and non-monetary
accounts are remeasured at historical rates. Revenues and expenses are
remeasured at the average exchange rates for each period, except for
depreciation expense, which is remeasured at historical rates. Foreign
currency exchange gains and (losses) were included in determining results of
operations and aggregated $0.2 million for the eight month period ended
December 31, 2002, $(0.1) million for the four month period ended April 30,
2002 and $(0.2) million and $(0.3) million for the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively.

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of financial
instruments, including auction rate securities, which are readily convertible
to cash and have original maturities of three months or less at the time of
acquisition. ZiLOG had no outstanding auction-rate securities in cash and cash
equivalents at December 31, 2002 and 2001.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (which approximates
actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Provisions, when
required, are made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their
estimated realizable values. It is possible that estimates of realizable value
can change in the short-term. Inventories, net of provisions, consist of the
following (in millions):


                             Successor Company         Predecessor Company
                             -----------------         -------------------
                             December 31, 2002          December 31, 2001
                             -----------------         -------------------
  Raw materials..............     $   0.5                  $   1.0
  Work-in-progress...........         7.5                     10.3
  Finished goods.............         2.6                      6.0
                                  $  10.6                  $  17.3



Property, plant and equipment: Property, plant and equipment were revalued at
May 1, 2002 in accordance with the adoption of Fresh-Start Reporting (see Note
3). At that time, accumulated depreciation was offset against cost and the
resulting net book value was adjusted to the fair values. For periods prior to
this, property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of
the assets, which are generally between three and seven years for machinery
and equipment and 30 years for buildings. Significant impairments of property,
plant and equipment were recorded in 2001 due to the operational restructuring
of the Company, and write-down of ZiLOG's eight-inch wafer fabrication
facility to its expected realizable value. See Note 7 below for a further
discussion. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the
shorter of the remaining terms of the leases or the estimated economic lives
of the improvements. Depreciation expense of property, plant and equipment was
$4.4 million, $2.4 million, $35.2 million and $39.4 million for the eight
month period ended December 31, 2002, the four month period ended April 30,
2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Assets
leased under a capital lease are recorded at the present value of the lease
obligation and are primarily amortized over the shorter of the remaining term
of the lease or the estimated economic life of the asset. Amortization of
leased assets was approximately $0.2 million in 2001, and $0.7 million in
2000. The Company did not have any assets leased under capital leases during
2002.


Property, plant and equipment consists of the following for the periods
indicated (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Successor         Predecessor
                                                                   Company            Company
                                                                 ------------      ------------
                                                                   Dec. 31,          Dec. 31,
                                                                     2002               2001
                                                                 ------------      ------------
Property, plant & equipment at cost:
<S>                                                               <C>                 <C>
   Land, buildings and leasehold improvements:                    $     9.0           $    6.2
   Machinery and equipment                                             17.3               88.3
                                                                  ---------           --------
                                                                       26.3               94.5
   Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                      (4.4)             (48.7)
                                                                  ---------           ---------
 Net property, plant and equipment                                 $   21.9           $   45.8
                                                                   ========           =========
</TABLE>


Accrued and Other Current Liabilities:

The following table shows details of the "accrued and other current
liabilities" line item of the balance sheet as follows: (in millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Successor         Predecessor
                                                                   Company            Company
                                                                 ------------      ------------
                                                                   Dec. 31,          Dec. 31,
                                                                     2002               2001
                                                                 ------------      ------------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>
Accrued compensation and employee benefits...........             $     7.4         $     9.0
Other accrued liabilities...........................                    2.6               4.9
Accrued special charges.............................                    0.6               9.7
Dividends payable on preferred stock.................                    -               16.6
Deferred income on shipments to distributors.........                   7.4               6.6
                                                                  ---------         ----------
Accrued and other current liabilities................             $    18.0         $    46.8
                                                                  =========         ==========
</TABLE>



Advertising expenses: The Company accounts for advertising costs as expense
for the period in which they are incurred. Advertising expenses for the eight
month period ended December 31, 2002 was approximately $0.2 million, for the
four month period ended April 30, 2002 was approximately $0.0 million, and
approximately $0.7 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively.

Shipping costs:  Shipping costs are included in cost of sales.

Use of estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Significant estimates made in preparing these
financial statements include excess and obsolete inventories, allowance for
doubtful accounts and sales returns and allowances. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.

Stock awards: The Company accounts for employee stock awards in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees," and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No.
44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation--an
Interpretation of APB No. 25", issued in March 2000, to account for its fixed
plan options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date
of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price. SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended
by SFAS 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and
Disclosure," established accounting and disclosure requirements using a
fair-value method of accounting described above, and the Company has adopted
only the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123. The table below illustrates the
effect on net income if the fair-value based method had been applied to all
outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

For stock option grants issued with an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of the stock as determined by the board of directors, the Company
recognizes no compensation expense for stock option grants. The board of
directors uses a variety of factors in determining the fair value of the
Company's common stock. Specifically, the board's primary considerations in
determining such fair values has varied overtime, but includes: from February
1998 through the third quarter of 1999, the per share acquisition price paid in
connection with the going-private transaction; from the fourth quarter of 1999
through the first quarter of 2000, public company market comparisons; in the
second and third quarters of 2000, ZiLOG's estimated public offering price
determined by its underwriters; and from fourth quarter of 2000 through May 15,
2002, the board's good faith judgment. The board's good faith judgment
considered the state of the business and its ability to survive under the high
debt level, the continuous history of generating net losses, and uncertainty
surrounding the potential outcome of the restructuring activities and
fresh-start revaluation. Subsequent to May 15, 2002 the Company's stock value
is based on the closing price quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

Since May 16, 2002, our common stock has traded on the Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board. For the period between May 13, 2002, the effective date of our
plan of reorganization, and May 16, 2002, our common stock was quoted through
the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service. The prices quoted on the
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions. Trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board has been sporadic
and volumes have been low. In addition, all trades since May 16, 2002 may not
have been required to be reported on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.
Consequently, pricing for options issued during the first two months after the
effective date of the plan of reorganization was based on the valuation as
approved under the plan of reorganization. Since October 2002, option pricing
has been based on the last trading price on the date of grant (or if there was
no trade on such date, then on the most recent date prior to the date of grant
on which there was a trade.)

Pro forma stock based compensation: The fair value of options granted in 2002
under the 2002 Omnibus Plan were estimated at the date of grant using the
Black Scholes option pricing model; and the fair value of the options granted
in 2001 and 2000 under the 1998 Plans were estimated at the date of grant
using the Minimum Value Method option-pricing model. The following weighted
average assumptions were used:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      Predecessor Company
                                                   Successor          -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Company                 Four
                                                   Eight                   Months
                                                   Months                 Ended
                                                   Ended December        April 30,                Year Ended December 31,
                                                   31,  2002                2002                2001                 2000
                                                  ----------------    ------------------- -------------------- ------------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>                 <C>                  <C>
Annual average risk free interest rate                   3.0%                3.0%                3.5%                 5.0%
Estimated life in years..........................          5                  5                    5                   5
Dividend yield...................................        0.0%                0.0%                0.0%                 0.0%
Volatility.......................................       89.9%                N/A                 N/A                  N/A
</TABLE>


For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the expense amortization of the options'
fair value is allocated over the options' vesting period on a
straight line basis.






<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                        Predecessor Company
                                                   Successor          -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Company                 Four
                                                   Eight                   Months
                                                   Months                 Ended
                                                   Ended December        April 30,                Year Ended December 31,
                                                   31,  2002                2002                2001                 2000
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>                    <C>                  <C>                <C>
Net income (loss), as reported                     $ (26.0)               $    275.9           $  (128.0)         $   (58.2)
Add stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income(loss),
  net of tax                                           2.9                       0.1                 1.9                2.6
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation
  expense determined under fair-value-based
  method for all rewards, net of tax                  (5.8)                     (0.4)               (1.3)              (5.0)
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pro forma net income (loss)                       $  (28.9)               $    275.6           $  (124.8)         $   (60.6)
                                                  ==========================================================================
</TABLE>


Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Effective January 1, 2002, ZiLOG adopted the
provisions of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("FAS 142"). At the time of adoption,
the Company had no amounts of goodwill recorded in the balance sheet,
therefore the initial adoption had no material effect to the Company. The
unaudited proforma effects of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on net loss for the
Company for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 are as follows (in
millions):

                                                   Predecessor Company
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                                  -----------------------
                                                     2001          2000
                                                     ----          ----

Net Loss                                          $(128.0)         $ (58.2)
Add back: goodwill amortization                       1.0              2.2
                                                  --------         --------
Adjusted net loss                                 $(127.0)         $ (56.0)
                                                  =======          =======


The proforma effects of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on the net loss for the
four months ended April 30, 2002 was not material.

Under FAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not
amortized, but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment
indicators arise) for impairment. The Company did not have any impairment of
goodwill in the eight months ended December 31, 2002. Separable intangible
assets that are deemed to have defined lives will continue to be amortized
over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). Intangible assets acquired
prior to 2002 were being amortized on a straight-line basis over lives ranging
from three to five years. In connection with the Company's fresh-start
reporting, separable intangible assets that are deemed to have defined lives
(primarily existing of technology and brand name) are being amortized
utilizing the pattern-of-use method over estimated useful lives ranging from 5
to 10 years.

The actual amortization for 2002 and the anticipated amortization schedule for
the remaining years of these intangible assets is as follows (in millions):


                                  Amortization         Current
                  Year               Amount           Technology      Brand Name
                ------------      ------------        ----------      ----------

                  2002              $  7.9              $  6.8         $   1.1
                  2003                 6.8                 5.5             1.3
                  2004                 4.2                 2.9             1.3
                  2005                 2.2                 1.1             1.1
                  2006                 1.4                 0.4             1.0
                  2007                 3.7                 0.3             3.4
                  Total             $ 26.2              $ 17.0         $   9.2


Research and Development Expenses. ZiLOG's policy is to record all research
and development expenditures with no future alternative use as period expenses
when incurred. In-process research and development charges relate to partially
developed semiconductor product designs that had not reached technological
feasibility and have no alternative future use on the date they were acquired
or valued for fresh-start reporting.

As of May 1, 2002, there were four projects that satisfied the criteria listed
above. These in-process research and development projects relate to
next-generation products in the Company's Z80 microprocessor and Z8
microcontroller product families, as well as a new infrared remote control
device for and a new IRDA transceiver targeted at the cellular telephone
market. The value of the projects identified to be in progress was determined
by estimating the future cash flows from the projects once commercially
feasible, discounting the net cash flows back to their present value and then
applying a percentage of completion to the calculated value. The gross margins
from sales of these new products are expected to be in the range of 45% to
50%, which is generally consistent with ZiLOG's current product offerings.

The percentage of completion for each project was determined based on research
and development expenses incurred as of May 1, 2002 for each project as a
percentage of total research and development expenses to bring the project to
technological feasibility. The discount rate used was 35% for each of the
projects. The Company completed and launched the first member of the Z8 Encore!
family of products and the IRDA transceiver product in 2002. The Company
expects to complete the other projects in 2003. The nature of efforts required
to develop the in-process technology into commercially viable products
primarily relates to completion of design, prototyping and testing to ensure
the products can be produced cost effectively and meet customer design
specifications, including functions, features and performance requirements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In accordance with the early adoption
provisions of SOP 90-7, on May 1, 2002, we adopted the following Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards: SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations;" SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections Business
Combinations; and SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities." We adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," on January 1, 2002. The adoption of these statements had no material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The principal provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that goodwill and other
intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life not be amortized
but rather tested annually for impairment. Under SFAS No. 142, intangible
assets that have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their
useful lives. SFAS No. 142 requires companies to test intangible assets that
will not be amortized for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair
value of those assets to their recorded amounts.

The principal provisions of SFAS No. 143 address financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long-lived assets and for the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143
requires an enterprise to record the fair value of an asset retirement
obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from
the acquisition, construction, development and or normal use of the assets.
The enterprise also is to record a corresponding increase to the carrying
amount of the related long-lived asset (i.e., the associated asset retirement
costs) and to depreciate that cost over the life of the asset. The liability
is changed at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time (i.e.,
accretion expense) and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying
the initial fair value measurement.

SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from
Extinguishment of Debt, and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64,
Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." SFAS No.
145 also rescinds SFAS No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor
Carriers," and amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an
inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions
and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic
effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 also
amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical
corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed
conditions.

In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards of
No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities."
SFAS No. 146 revises the accounting for specified employee and contract
terminations that are part of restructuring activities. Under SFAS No. 146
companies will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or
disposal activity only when the liability is incurred and can be measured at
fair value. Commitment to an exit plan or a plan of disposal expresses only
management's intended future actions and therefore, does not meet the
requirement for recognizing a liability and related expense. This statement
only applies to termination benefits offered for a specific termination event
or a specified period The Company adopted this statement for exit or disposal
activities initiated on or after May 1, 2002.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others", which clarifies disclosure and
recognition/measurement requirements related to certain guarantees. The
disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements issued after
December 15, 2002 and the recognition/measurement requirements are effective
on a prospective basis for guarantees issued or modified after December 31,
2002. The application of the requirements of FIN 45 did not have a material
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure". SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123,
to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123
to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial
statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The
transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim
disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial
statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. As the
Company did not make a voluntary change to the fair value based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation in 2002, the adoption of SFAS
No. 148 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and
results of operations.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which
addresses consolidation by a business of variable interest entities in which
it is the primary beneficiary. The Interpretation is effective immediately for
certain disclosure requirements and variable interest entities created after
January 31, 2003, and in fiscal 2004 for all other variable interest entities.
The Company is reviewing the provisions of the Interpretation and complies
with the disclosure requirements, but does not expect the Interpretation to
have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Effective prospectively for arrangements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003, Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue
00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables," addresses the
accounting, by a vendor, for contractual arrangements in which multiple
revenue-generating activities will be performed by the vendor. In some
situations, the different revenue-generating activities (deliverables) are
sufficiently separable and there exists sufficient evidence of fair values to
account separately for the different deliverables (that is, there are separate
units of accounting). In other situations, some or all of the different
deliverables are interrelated closely or there is not sufficient evidence of
fair value to account separately for the different deliverables. EITF Issue
00-21 addresses when and, if so, how an arrangement involving multiple
deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. The Company
has not yet determined the impact of the adoption of EITF Issue 00-21 on its
consolidated financial statements.


NOTE 2.    FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING AND REORGANIZATION

The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, had a net
stockholders' deficiency at December 31, 2001 and its business and financial
growth have been negatively affected by a difficult business climate. These
conditions led to the need to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
order to restructure the Company's 9.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the
"Notes").

ZiLOG filed the Reorganization Plan with the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California on February 28, 2002 (the
"Reorganization Plan") and the bankruptcy court confirmed the Reorganization
Plan as described herein on April 30, 2002. The Reorganization Plan became
effective on May 13, 2002.

The Company operated its business under Chapter 11 in the ordinary course and
had obtained the necessary approvals from the bankruptcy court to pay
employees, trade, and certain other creditors in full and on time regardless
of whether their claims arose before or after the Chapter 11 filing. The
claims of employees, general unsecured creditors (including trade creditors,
licensors, and lessors) and secured creditors, other than holders of the Notes
and preferred stock, have not been compromised under the Reorganization Plan.

Under the Reorganization Plan, the Notes were cancelled. Each noteholder
received, in exchange for their Notes, their pro rata share of:

o          28,000,000 shares of ZiLOG's newly issued common stock. As of
           December 31, 2002, this represented approximately 86% of the
           outstanding equity on a fully diluted basis.

o          100% of the newly issued series A preferred stock issued by ZiLOG's
           non-operating subsidiary, ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc., which is called MOD
           III, Inc. Holders of MOD III, Inc. series A preferred stock are
           entitled to receive an aggregate liquidation preference of $30
           million plus any accrued but unpaid dividends on the MOD III, Inc.
           series A preferred stock from the net proceeds from the sale of the
           Company's MOD III 8" wafer fabrication plant located in Nampa,
           Idaho. This plant was transferred to MOD III, Inc. upon
           effectiveness of the Reorganization Plan. Dividends accrue on the
           MOD III, Inc. series A preferred stock at 9.5% per annum and these
           dividends increase the liquidation preference accordingly. As of
           December 31, 2002 the aggregate liquidation preference was $31.9
           million. Any sale of the MOD III assets for an amount less than $30
           million will not generate any further recourse to ZiLOG, Inc.

o          50% of MOD III, Inc.'s newly issued series B preferred stock. ZiLOG
           retains the remaining 50% of the new MOD III, Inc. series B
           preferred stock as well as 100% of the common stock. Holders of the
           new MOD III, Inc. series B preferred stock are entitled to receive
           the net sale proceeds from any sale of MOD III, Inc.'s assets in
           excess of the series A preferred stock liquidation preference.

Any impairment in the fair value of MOD III assets below the carrying amount
or any sale of MOD III assets for aggregate proceeds of less than $30.0
million would result in a charge to the consolidated statement of operations
in the period in which an impairment is recorded or the sale is completed.

The Reorganization Plan also provided for the cancellation of all of ZiLOG's
currently outstanding preferred and common stock and all options and warrants
related thereto. All accumulated dividends and any other obligations with
respect to the Company's outstanding preferred and common shares were also
extinguished. Each former holder of common stock received a pro rata share of
$50,000. Each holder of preferred stock received a pro rata share of $150,000.

The Reorganization Plan also provided for the payment in full, with interest
if appropriate, or reinstatement, as appropriate, of all employee and trade
claims. In order for the Reorganization Plan to have become effective, the
Company was required to, among other things, revise its charter and bylaws,
enter into a new secured financing agreement, and designate a new board of
directors. All these requirements were met to the satisfaction of the Court.

Chapter 11 reorganization-related costs of $1.0 million and $4.0 million
included in the consolidated statements of operations as special charges and
reorganization items for the eight and four months ended December 31, 2002,
and April 30, 2002, respectively, relate primarily to legal and other
professional service fees incurred by both the Company and the former informal
committee of bondholders. During the period between the filing of the
Reorganization Plan and its confirmation by the bankruptcy court, February 28,
2002 to April 30, 2002, ZiLOG was required to file public documents as a
"debtor-in-possession." Accordingly, legal and other professional service fees
paid during this period amounting to $2.3 million have been separately
identified in the Company's consolidated statements of cash flow.

Liabilities, which were subject to compromise under the terms of the
Reorganization Plan, are summarized as follows (in millions):

            Senior secured notes payable....................        $   280.0
            Accrued interest on senior secured notes........             27.2
            Dividends payable on preferred stock............             18.5
            Total liabilities subject to compromise.........        $   325.7

NOTE 3.    FRESH-START REPORTING

On February 28, 2002, ZiLOG and its subsidiary, MOD III, Inc., filed the
Reorganization Plan with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The
bankruptcy court subsequently confirmed the Reorganization Plan by its order
entered on April 30, 2002. The Reorganization Plan became effective on May 13,
2002. The Company prior to emergence from bankruptcy is referred to as the
"Predecessor Company" and the reorganized company is referred to as the
"Successor Company."

Pursuant to the Reorganization Plan, ZiLOG extinguished $325.7 million of
liabilities, which included $280.0 million principal amount of the Notes,
$27.2 million in accrued interest due on the Notes and $18.5 million of
dividends payable on the Company's previously outstanding series A preferred
stock. The former noteholders received substantially all of the Company's new
common stock and a liquidation preference in the net proceeds on the sale of
the assets held by MOD III, Inc. The former equity holders received an
aggregate $200,000 in cash. All debt and equity securities of the Predecessor
Company were cancelled. As a consequence of these events, the Predecessor
Company recorded a $205.7 million net gain on the extinguishment of these
liabilities.

On May 1, 2002, ZiLOG adopted "fresh-start" accounting principles proscribed
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant's Statement of
Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the
Bankruptcy Code," or SOP 90-7. Fresh-start accounting was appropriate because
the Company's former noteholders received substantially all of the Company's
new common stock and the reorganization value of the assets of the Successor
Company were less than the total pre-petition liabilities plus post-petition
liabilities.

SOP 90-7 requires the Company to establish a reorganization value upon the
adoption of fresh-start reporting. ZiLOG's reorganization value was estimated
by Lazard Freres & Co., LLC, its independent financial advisor, using
discounted projected cash flows, precedent transactions and public company
comparisons. These valuations indicated a range of reorganization values
between $70 million and $109 million. In agreement with the informal committee
of noteholders and with the approval of the bankruptcy court, the Company
established a reorganization equity value of $90.0 million as of May 1, 2002
for purposes of applying fresh-start reporting. This estimate of equity value
was derived from a weighted average of three valuations based on comparable
public company, precedent transaction and discounted cash flow analyses. These
valuations were based on the underlying assumptions that include: the
successful reorganization of the Company's business and finances in a timely
manner; the implementation of the Company's business plan as a reorganized
entity; the accuracy of information supplied by management about its business
and prospects; achievement of forecasted projections; market conditions as of
December 31, 2001 continuing through an assumed effective date of March 31,
2002; and the plan of reorganization becoming effective in accordance with the
estimates and assumptions upon which the valuation was based. The value of an
operating business such as the Company's, however, is subject to numerous
uncertainties and contingencies, which are difficult to predict, and will
fluctuate with changing factors affecting its financial condition and
prospects.

Fresh-start reporting requires that the Company also record its assets at fair
value upon adoption. Consequently, the Company engaged Key Assets as
independent appraisers to assist management in the valuation of its tangible
assets and engaged another independent party to conduct a valuation of its
intangible assets. These appraisals resulted in a $13.1 million increase in
property, plant and equipment related to the five-inch wafer fabrication
facility and an adjacent undeveloped parcel of land. The valuation undertaken
by Key Assets for fresh-start reporting assigned fair value to property, plant
and equipment in Nampa, Idaho related to our five-inch wafer fabrication
facility (MOD II) and our data center, as well as an adjacent 20 acre parcel of
undeveloped land assuming a willing buyer and a willing seller and not under
distressed sale conditions. Previously, our five-inch wafer fabrication
facility had been separately held for sale at a negotiated selling price of
$3.0 million, based on a non-binding purchase offer received from a potential
buyer in December 2000. Management agreed to the terms of the December 2000
purchase offer for several reasons including: monetary and human cost savings
compared with closing and decommissioning the facility, as well as terminating
the employees; and the acquirer was also willing to assure an uninterrupted
source of supply of wafers manufactured in the MOD II facility until
alternative sources could be qualified by the Company. Following a change in
strategy, the MOD II assets were put back into service in June 2001. In June,
2001, management determined that the fair value of the MOD II assets was $3.0
million.

This appraisal also resulted in a $3.9 million increase in finished good
inventories held by the Company and its distributors to reflect fair values at
May 1, 2002. The appraisers also identified several separable intangible
assets that were valued and recorded as part of fresh-start reporting as
follows (in millions):

                                    Asset                                Value
              -------------------------------------------------      ----------
              Existing technology..............................      $    17.0
              In-process research and development..............           18.7
              Brand name.......................................            9.2
              Total............................................      $    44.9


The Company recorded a gain of $83.7 million in the Predecessor Company's
financial statements in connection with the fresh-start adjustments referred
to above. These increases in carrying value of the Company's intangible assets
were based on three valuation approaches, depending on the specific intangible
asset to be valued: the income approach, the cost approach and the market
approach. These increases in carrying value of the Company's capital assets
were based on physical inspections and written appraisals that included market
data and cost approaches. Goodwill of $26.7 million was also recorded as part
of fresh-start reporting. In the eight months ended December 31, 2002, the
Company recorded a net increase in goodwill of $7.9 million to $34.6 million.
This increase related primarily to a reduction in the tax basis of certain
assets at December 31, 2002 as a result of the application of tax regulations
to the Company following completion of the reorganization plan.

The Company's results of operations after April 30, 2002 and the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2002 are not comparable to the results of
operations prior to April 30, 2002 and the balance sheet at December 31, 2001
due to its adoption of "fresh-start" reporting upon the Company's emergence
from bankruptcy.

The table below provides a reconciliation of the Predecessor Company's
unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2002 to that of the
Successor Company on May 1, 2002, which presents the adjustments that give
effect to the reorganization and fresh-start reporting (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Predecessor                                            Reclassifications        Successor
                                    Company at April                         Fresh-Start     --------------------   Company at May
                                        30, 2002       Reorganization (1)  Adjustments (2)           (3)               1, 2002
                                    ----------------   ------------------  ---------------   --------------------   --------------
<S>                                   <C>                <C>                 <C>                <C>                   <C>
ASSETS
Current assets                        $   51.6           $       --          $    2.7           $       --            $   54.3
MOD III, Inc. assets held for sale        30.0                   --                --                   --                30.0
Net property, plant and equipment         11.9                   --              13.1                   --                25.0
Other assets                               1.0                   --                --                   --                 1.0
Fresh start separable
 intangible assets                          --                   --              44.9                   --                44.9
Fresh-start goodwill
 (indefinite life)                          --                   --              26.7                   --                26.7
                                    ----------------   ------------------  ---------------   --------------------   --------------
                                      $   94.5            $      --          $   87.4           $       --            $  181.9
                                    ================   ==================  ===============   ====================   ==============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
 EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current liabilities                  $    44.1           $       --         $    (2.3)          $       --            $   41.8
Other long-term liabilities               14.1                   --               6.0                   --                20.1
Liabilities subject
 to compromise                           325.7                (325.7)              --                   --                  --

Minority interest in
 MOD III, Inc. assets                       --                  30.0               --                   --                30.0

Stockholders'
 equity (deficiency):
      Preferred stock                     25.0                   --                --                 (25.0)                --
      Common stock                         0.4                   0.3               --                  (0.4)               0.3
      Deferred stock compensation         (0.5)                  --                --                   0.5                 --
      Additional paid-in capital          13.2                  89.7               --                 (13.2)              89.7
      Accumulated deficit               (327.5)                205.7             83.7                  38.1                 --
                                    ----------------   ------------------  ---------------   --------------------   --------------
Total stockholders'
 equity (deficiency)                    (289.4)                295.7             83.7                   --                90.0
                                    ----------------   ------------------  ---------------   --------------------   --------------
Total liabilities and
 stockholders' equity                 $   94.5            $      --          $   87.4           $       --            $  181.9
                                    ================   ==================  ===============   ====================   ==============
</TABLE>


------------------------------
(1)  Reorganization adjustments reflect consummation of the Reorganization
     Plan, including the elimination of liabilities subject to compromise and
     the reorganization of the Successor Company.
(2)  Fresh-start adjustments reflect the adoption of fresh-start reporting,
     including adjustments to record goodwill, identifiable tangible and
     intangible assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values.
     Management estimated the fair value of its assets using independent
     appraisals.
(3)  Reclassification reflects the elimination of Predecessor Company's
     stockholder's deficiency.

The Company's net gain upon extinguishment of liabilities and fresh-start
adjustments were comprised of the following elements (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                                                <C>
             Extinguishment of debt                                                $  280.0
             Extinguishment of accrued interest                                        27.2
             Extinguishment of dividends payable on preferred stock                    18.5
             Minority interest in MOD III, Inc. assets                                (30.0)
             Reorganization equity value                                              (90.0)
                                                                             ----------------------
                 Net gain on discharge of debt                                     $  205.7
                                                                             ======================

             Effect of fresh-start adjustments                                    $    66.7
             Revaluation of fixed and tangible assets to fair value                    17.0
                                                                             ----------------------
                 Total fresh-start adjustments                                    $    83.7
                                                                             ======================
</TABLE>


NOTE 4.     ACCOUNTING CHANGE - RECOGNITION OF REVENUE ON SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS

Effective January 1, 2000, the Company changed its accounting method for
recognizing revenue on shipments to distributors who have rights of return and
price protection on unsold merchandise held by them. The Company previously
recognized revenue upon shipment to these distributors, net of appropriate
allowances for sales returns, price protection and warranty costs. Following
the accounting change, revenue recognition on shipments to these distributors
is deferred until the products are resold by the distributors to their
customers. The Company believes that deferral of revenue recognition on these
distributor shipments and related gross margin until the product is shipped by
the distributor results in a more meaningful measurement of results of
operations as it better conforms to the changing business environment and is
more consistent with industry practice; therefore it is a preferable method of
accounting.

Some of the changes in the Company's business that precipitated its change in
revenue recognition for the distribution sales channel included:

o        Increasing distributor sales - The Company expects to continue
         increasing the proportion of distributor sales as a percentage of its
         total sales.

o        Fewer distributors - during 2000, the Company concentrated its
         distribution network to a fewer number of distributors. The
         concentration of sales volume creates a situation where each
         distributor has more leverage to demand higher volume discounts.

o        Increased inventory in the channel - Prior to its accounting change,
         the value of inventory in the Company's distribution channel
         increased substantially. The Company believes that high levels of
         inventory in the distribution channel creates pressure on its to
         offer larger concessions before its distributors will place new
         orders.

o        New products - The Company expects that its new product offerings
         will be sold through its distribution channel. Generally, the
         Company's new products are more complex and will have higher initial
         selling prices than its existing product offerings. Over the next
         several years, the Company's new products are expected to become its
         predominant product offerings and they are expected to have a higher
         degree of pricing volatility than the Company's current products.

The cumulative effect of the change in accounting method was a charge of $8.5
million, net of a zero income tax effect.. The effect of adopting the new
accounting method in 2000 resulted in an increase in the net loss of $1.6
million, exclusive of the cumulative effect of the accounting change.


NOTE 5:    ACQUISITIONS AND EQUITY INVESTMENT

On July 27, 2000, ZiLOG acquired Calibre, Inc. ("Calibre") pursuant to a
merger agreement for 629,666 shares of ZiLOG common stock, par value $.01 per
share ("Common Shares") and 112,214 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of
vested options. The purchase price of approximately $4.9 million, including
acquisition costs of approximately $0.1 million, was allocated based on fair
values as follows: tangible net assets of $0.1 million; goodwill of $3.3
million and in-process research and development of approximately $1.5 million,
included in special charges. Goodwill was being amortized on a straight-line
basis to research and development expense for over four years During the
fourth quarter of 2001, the remaining $2.1 million net book value of this
goodwill was deemed impaired and recorded as special charges. For financial
statement purposes, the acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and,
accordingly, the results of operations of Calibre subsequent to July 27, 2000
are included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

Calibre's in-process research and development, primarily focused on a
partially developed technology that replaces third-party transceivers to
enable wireless communications, was expensed in the third quarter because the
projects related to the acquired research and development had not reached
technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. The nature of
efforts required to develop the purchased in-process technology into
commercially viable products primarily relates to completion of design,
prototyping and testing to ensure the products can be produced to meet
customer design specifications. Such customer design specifications include
product functions, features and performance requirements. To date, the Company
has been unsuccessful in marketing these products and there can be no
assurance that these products will ever achieve commercial viability.

Factors considered in valuing Calibre's in-process research and development
included the state of development of each project, target markets and
associated risks of achieving technological feasibility and market acceptance
of the products. The value of the purchased in-process technology was
determined by estimating the projected net cash flows relating to such
products, including costs to complete the technology and product development
and the future expected income upon commercialization of the products over
periods ranging from three to five years. These cash flows were then
discounted to their net present value using an after-tax discount rate of 40
percent. The estimated steps of completion were applied to the net present
value of the future discounted cash flows to arrive at the $1.5 million charge
for in-process research and development that was immediately written off to
special charges in the statement of operations.

Calibre's pro forma results are not presented, as the pro forma results of
operations would not be materially different from ZiLOG's financial
statements.

On March 22, 2000, ZiLOG acquired 3.0 million shares or 20 percent of the
then-outstanding common stock of Qualcore Group, Inc. ("Qualcore") for cash of
$8.0 million plus expenses of $0.1 million, pursuant to a purchase and sale
agreement (the "Qualcore Agreement"). Subject to the Qualcore Agreement, $5.5
million was paid on March 22, 2000 and $2.5 million was paid on April 14,
2000. ZiLOG accounted for its investment in Qualcore common stock using the
equity method. The difference between the total cost of ZiLOG's investment in
Qualcore of $8.1 million and ZiLOG's underlying equity in Qualcore's net
assets was being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years. Under the
terms of the Agreement, ZiLOG had the option until June 30, 2001 to acquire
all of the remaining outstanding shares of common stock of Qualcore for cash
and/or a number of ZiLOG's Common Shares. If ZiLOG did not exercise this
option, Qualcore had the right to put approximately 11% of Qualcore's common
stock to the Company for $5.2 million. The Company did not exercise this
option. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company reached a settlement
agreement with Qualcore in which the Company paid Qualcore a termination
charge of $450,000, and returned all the shares representing ZiLOG's 20%
equity ownership in Qualcore. The termination charge has been recorded as a
special charge. In return, Qualcore cancelled its put right. In connection
with this settlement the Company wrote-off the remaining balance of its
investment in Qualcore. The charge of $4.9 million was included as a part of
the $7.2 million equity method investment loss recorded in the year ended
December 31, 2001.

NOTE 6.         FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash in bank accounts,
commercial paper, money market accounts and short-term time deposits. The
short-term debt represents borrowings under a revolving line of credit with a
commercial lender. The carrying amount on the balance sheet for cash and cash
equivalents at December 31, 2002, and 2001were $29.4 million and $30.7 million,
respectively, which approximates fair value, due to their short maturities. The
carrying amount, which approximates fair value due to its variable interest
rate, on the balance sheet at December 31, 2002 and 2001 for the short-term
debt was $6.9 million and $12.8 million, respectively, which represents the
principle amount borrowed. The fair value of the accounts receivable and
accounts payable approximates the carrying amount because of the short
maturity of these instruments.

NOTE 7.         SPECIAL CHARGES AND REORGANIZATION ITEMS

Background Discussion and Summary of Special Actions. Beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2000, ZiLOG experienced a sharp decrease in bookings and billings
in most of its product lines and this weak customer demand trend has persisted
through today. ZiLOG believes that the decline in demand for its products is
reflective of global economic conditions, particularly in high technology
markets.

In response to declining net sales, and under the leadership of its CEO, ZiLOG
commenced a series of operational restructuring activities designed to refocus
on its core micrologic business and reduce its overall cost structure. More
detail of these restructuring actions and the related costs are included in
the "Special Charges" captions below. These actions were recorded as special
charges and reorganization items and included the following, in chronological
order:

o        In December 2000, April 2001, June 2001, November 2002 and December
         2002, ZiLOG implemented a series of severance actions that resulted
         in elimination of over 600 positions throughout the Company. Over
         half of these reductions were in its manufacturing functions,
         particularly in the Company's Philippine test operations and MOD III
         wafer fabrication facility in Idaho. ZiLOG also reduced its executive
         management team from 15 people down to 5 people.

o        In December 2000, ZiLOG recorded a special charge for long-lived
         asset impairments of $9.3 million that primarily relates to the
         impairment of its MOD II facility based on management's intention at
         the time to sell the facility.

o        In the first quarter of 2001, ZiLOG engaged Lazard Freres & Co., LLC
         as its independent financial advisor to begin evaluating various
         strategic alternatives, including a possible sale or reorganization
         of the Company.

o        During June 2001, ZiLOG announced plans to consolidate its two Nampa,
         Idaho manufacturing facilities and to transfer wafer probe operations
         from Nampa to the Philippines. The wafer probe transfer was completed
         in October 2001 and the Nampa consolidation was finalized in January
         2002.

o        In September 2001, the Company did not make the scheduled interest
         payment on its notes payable management entered into discussions with
         an informal group of noteholders to restructure the Company's
         indebtedness.

o        In December 2001, ZiLOG recorded a $30.4 million charge for
         impairment of the MOD III wafer fabrication facility that is being
         held for disposal. ZiLOG also accrued contractual bonuses for the MOD
         III employees that stayed-on to close the factory and make it ready
         for sale.

o        Also in December 2001, we negotiated a buy-out of our Campbell,
         California headquarters facility lease and entered into a new lease
         in San Jose, California that is expected to save us $4.5 million in
         operating expenses for 2002 versus 2001, excluding one-time costs.
         The one-time expenditures associated with relocating our headquarters
         totaled $5.0 million, comprised of: $2.8 million special charge for
         the lease buy-out; $1.5 million special charge for non-cash loss on
         disposal of fixed assets; $0.2 million special charge for moving
         expenses; and $0.5 million capital expenditures relating to our new
         facility.

o        In the first quarter of 2002, ZiLOG filed a prepackaged Chapter 11
         plan of reorganization with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
         the Northern District of California and ZiLOG announced the
         discontinuation of all product development activities related to the
         Company's CarteZian line of 32-bit RISC microprocessors. ZiLOG also
         closed its Austin, Texas design center and several domestic and
         international sales offices.

o        On May 13, 2002, the plan of reorganization became effective.

2002 Special Charges Analysis. During 2002, ZiLOG incurred $5.0 million of
professional fees for financial advisers that assisted in connection with the
Company's debt restructuring and SEC filings associated with that action.
ZiLOG recorded the special charges for these fees as the services were
performed throughout the year.

ZiLOG incurred special charges of $3.2 million throughout the year relating to
the closure of MOD III eight-inch wafer fabrication facility in Idaho. These
charges were primarily post-closure maintenance costs related to utilities,
taxes, insurance and other maintenance costs required to maintain the facility
in a condition required for the sale of the property. These charges also
included relocation of production activities to alternative ZiLOG
manufacturing sites. At December 31, 2002, approximately $0.1 million was
accrued for post-closure maintenance costs, which payments were made in 2003.

During 2002, ZiLOG recorded asset impairments of $2.7 million. The majority of
this charge was in connection with the closure of the Company's Austin, Texas
design center in the first quarter of 2002. Furniture, fixtures and equipment
with a book value of approximately $1.7 million were abandoned. Also in the
first quarter of 2002, approximately $0.8 million of computer aided design
software was impaired as a result of the Company's decision to cancel
development of the CarteZian family of 32-bit RISC microprocessors. During the
second quarter of 2002, $0.2 million of unamortized goodwill relating to
ZiLOG's 2000 acquisition of PLC Corporation was deemed to be of no future
value and was written-off.

The Company incurred $2.5 million of employee severance pay and termination
benefits during 2002 that were payable in cash. During the first quarter of
2002, in connection with closure of ZiLOG's Austin, Texas design center and
the streamlining of ZiLOG's sales force, severance and termination benefits of
$1.2 million were paid. In November and December of 2002, ZiLOG announced a
reduction in force at its Nampa, Idaho and Philippines manufacturing
facilities due to the continued lower production levels and continuing lower
demand for its products. Approximately $1.0 million of employee severance pay
and termination benefits were recorded. Additionally, in November 2002, a
reduction in force of the Company's sales force and support personnel was
announced due to the continued weak demand for the Company's products.
Severance pay and termination benefits of $0.3 million was recorded for this
action. At December 31, 2002, approximately $0.5 million was accrued for
payment of severance and termination benefits for the November and December
actions, which payments are scheduled to be made in 2003.

ZiLOG incurred special charges of $0.5 million in 2002 related to the closure
and relocation of certain domestic sales offices.

ZiLOG recorded a reduction of other special charges of approximately $0.2
million in December 2002, resulting from a settlement of a disputed 1998
contract between a third party and Seattle Silicon Corporation, which ZiLOG
acquired in 1999. ZiLOG received a cash payment in January 2003.

2001 Special Charges Analysis. During 2001, ZiLOG had asset impairment charges
totaling $36.9 million. The majority of this charge related to a $30.4 million
write-down in the carrying value of the MOD III eight-inch wafer fabrication
facility in Nampa, Idaho to its estimated fair value of $30.0 million in
December 2001. The write-down of MOD III was predicated on idling the facility
and it is not planned to be used in the Company's operations. The fair value
of MOD III machinery and equipment were determined with the assistance of an
appraiser who specializes in the semiconductor industry. "Fair Value," as
defined in the appraisal report, reflects the most likely realizable proceeds
that would be expected upon the sale of the idled equipment of MOD III,
between ZiLOG as a willing seller, and a willing and knowledgeable buyer,
based upon the market conditions that existed as of December 31, 2001. The
fair value of MOD III land and building were determined based on market
comparison with similar properties and based on consultation with a commercial
real estate agent. MOD III completed its final manufacturing in January 2002.
The property, plant and equipment of MOD III were idled in January 2002, and
are being held for sale. ZiLOG has engaged a company who specializes in the
disposition of semiconductor manufacturing equipment and facilities to
actively market the MOD III facility for sale. The Company desires to sell MOD
III as expeditiously as possible, although given weak current market
conditions and the high level of excess manufacturing capacity in the
semiconductor industry, management is unable to determine when or if the
Company will be able to sell MOD III. In accordance with the reorganization
plan, ZiLOG transferred the assets of MOD III to a new subsidiary that ZiLOG
owns jointly with its former noteholders.

ZiLOG had additional asset impairments in 2001 totaling $6.5 million comprised
of:

o        $2.9 million of various surplus assets in the second quarter of 2001
         relating to purchased internal use materials planning software that
         was never deployed and surplus test equipment;

o        $1.5 million of abandoned furniture, fixtures and building
         improvements that were given to the Company's landlord in connection
         with the early termination of its headquarters lease in Campbell,
         California; and

o        $2.1 million impairment of goodwill associated with the business
         ZiLOG acquired from Calibre, Inc. in July 2000. ZiLOG determined that
         the Calibre goodwill was impaired based on significant
         under-performance compared to management's acquisition business case
         and negative cash flows that are being generated from this business.
         In addition, the primary customers for this business serve the
         electronic personal data assistant market that is experiencing fierce
         competition and declining market demand.

During 2001, ZiLOG recorded $6.8 million of employee retention bonuses,
severance pay and termination benefits that were payable in cash. In addition,
ZiLOG incurred $1.7 million of stock-based compensation associated with
executives who received accelerated vesting and extended exercise terms on
stock options in connection with their severance packages. ZiLOG accrued these
involuntary termination costs after management has approved a plan of
termination, including identification of specific job functions to be
eliminated, and the termination benefits have been communicated to those
employees that may be affected by the action. The $6.8 million of cash costs
consisted of:

o        $4.5 million for employee retention bonuses, severance, and
         termination benefits for the employees who were terminated in
         connection with a reduction in force due to the planned closure of
         the Company's eight-inch wafer fabrication facility in Nampa, Idaho.
         Employees who were to be terminated in connection with the closure of
         MOD III were provided with contracts whereby they would receive
         termination benefits including stay-on bonuses, severance and medical
         benefits upon their termination if they continued to work through the
         closure date. ZiLOG accrued the $4.5 million contracted termination
         benefits expense ratably over the employee's service period during
         the six months ended December 31, 2001. This action resulted in the
         reduction of approximately 150 employees. At December 31, 2001,
         approximately $4.2 million was accrued for these payments, which
         amount was paid primarily in the first quarter of 2002. Also at
         December 31, 2001 we had $1.4 million of severance accruals relating
         to previous actions that are being paid-out in the remaining periods
         left under the terminated employee's employment contracts.

o        $2.3 million of involuntary severance benefits were accrued in the
         second quarter of 2001. These actions primarily related to
         approximately 65 manufacturing headcount reductions in the Company's
         Philippine test facility, elimination of approximately 50 engineering
         and other domestic personnel largely in the central technology group
         in Nampa, Idaho, and elimination of four senior executive positions
         within corporate headquarters. Also in connection with these actions,
         ZiLOG eliminated approximately 75 positions company-wide through
         voluntary attrition and cancellation of open personnel requisitions.

The Company had $5.6 million of severance accruals at December 31, 2001
relating to these and previous actions. The Company paid $4.5 million of this
amount in the first quarter of 2002 upon the closure of MOD III and the
balance of $1.1 million was paid during 2002 over the remaining periods
left under the terminated employees' employment agreements.

ZiLOG incurred contract termination charges of $3.2 million in 2001, as
follows:

o        In November 2001, ZiLOG negotiated an agreement with the owner of its
         Campbell, California headquarters facility to terminate its lease.
         The Company agreed to pay termination charges of $2.8 million in cash
         and transfer title to certain assets and leasehold improvements in
         return for cancellation of approximately $10.0 million in future
         lease commitments on the 108,000 square foot headquarters facility.
         ZiLOG finalized its headquarters relocation in January 2002 and paid
         the $2.8 million settlement payment to its former landlord.

o        During the fourth quarter of 2001, ZiLOG reached a settlement
         agreement with its equity investment partner, Qualcore Group, Inc. in
         which ZiLOG paid Qualcore a termination charge of $450,000, and
         returned all the shares representing its 20% equity ownership in
         Qualcore to the former owners of Qualcore. In return, Qualcore
         cancelled its right to "put" approximately 11% of Qualcore's common
         stock to ZiLOG for an aggregate cost of $5.2 million. All future
         design services from Qualcore, if any, will be purchased under
         standard pay-for-performance-and-delivery contracts.

ZiLOG incurred other special charges in 2001 totaling $1.4 million that
related primarily to manufacturing consolidation and relocation costs
associated with moving wafer probe operations from Nampa, Idaho to the
Philippines. These cost were expensed as incurred, primarily during the fourth
quarter of 2001. Approximately $0.2 million was accrued for payment in
connection with these consolidation costs at December 31, 2001.

ZiLOG incurred $4.3 million of professional fees for financial advisors that
assisted in connection with the Company's debt restructuring. ZiLOG recorded
the special charges for these fees as the services were performed throughout
the year. At December 31, 2001, approximately $1.1 million was accrued for
future payments in connection with these professional fees incurred during
2001, which fees were paid in 2002.

2000 Special Charges Analysis. During the fourth quarter of 2000, ZiLOG
incurred special charges totaling $14.8 million. In December 2000, management
approved a plan for the sale of the Company's five-inch wafer fabrication
facility in Nampa, Idaho. The decision to sell this facility was based on the
Company's desire to reduce fixed manufacturing overhead costs by transferring
most production into its newer eight-inch wafer fabrication that was
under-utilized. Property, plant, and equipment, with a book value of $9.9
million, were written down by $6.9 million to an estimated realizable value of
$3.0 million at December 31, 2000. In 2000, the Company reclassified these
assets and the remaining carrying value of $3.0 million to other current
assets. When the Company wrote down the MOD II facility in December 2000 the
fair value used was determined based on a non-binding purchase offer the
Company received from American Microsystems, Inc. ("AMI") in connection with
the proposed sale of the facility. At that time, the impairment of MOD II was
based on the expected sales price in AMI's offer as MOD II was an asset that
was "held for sale." The offer from AMI was a genuine offer and the Company
used this value as a metric because the price had been agreed through
arms'-length negotiations. The Company believes that this valuation, and the
related impairment charge recorded on the assets of MOD II, are consistent
with the guidance contained in paragraph 7 of SFAS No. 121, which states
"[t]he fair value of an asset is the amount at which the asset could be bought
or sold in a current transaction between willing parties." After the proposed
sale to AMI fell through in April 2001, the Company unsuccessfully continued
to actively market the MOD II facility through June 2001. In April 2001, the
Company's board of directors appointed a new Chief Executive Officer, James M.
Thorburn. Mr. Thorburn reviewed the Company's business strategy and determined
in June 2001 that the Company should retain MOD II and to close MOD III. This
decision was predicated on the fact that the Company's previous business
strategy had been focused on developing high-end communications products that
required more complex wafer fabrication processes afforded by the MOD III
facility. When the Company's strategy changed to focus on its core 8-bit
micrologic products, the Company ceased all development activities related to
products targeted at the high-end communications market and it closed its
Austin, Texas design center. Because of the shift in product strategy, the
0.35-micron manufacturing capability of MOD III was no longer essential to the
Company's manufacturing strategy. This led to the decision to retain MOD II
since it has significantly lower operating costs than MOD III and it has ample
capabilities to support the fabrication of most of the Company's core
products. Based on that determination, the Company returned MOD II back to
productive service, but did not adjust the basis of these assets.

No adjustment was made to the carrying value of the MOD II assets when the
assets were put back into service in June 2001. The Company early adopted the
guidelines in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ("SFAS 144") in 2001.
Management believed that no adjustment to the carrying value of the MOD II
assets was required based on management's interpretation of SFAS 144, paragraph
38 which states that "if circumstances arise that previously were considered
unlikely and, as a result, an entity decides not to sell a long-lived asset
(disposal group) previously classified as held for sale, the asset (disposal
group) shall be reclassified as held and used. A long-lived asset that is
reclassified shall be measured individually at the lower of its (a) carrying
amount before the asset (disposal group) was classified as held for sale,
adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been
recognized had the asset (disposal group) been continuously classified as held
and used, or (b) fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to
sell." The Company determined that the fair value of MOD II at the time of the
decision not to sell the assets and place them back into service was $3 million
and compared this amount to the $7 million carrying value had the asset never
been reclassified to held for sale and depreciation had continued to be
recognized. Accordingly, the Company did not increase the carrying value of
MOD II upon reclassifying the asset from held for sale to held and used. For
the year ended December 31, 2001, depreciation expense was lowered by
approximately $2.8 million, compared to what would have been recorded without
the December 2000 write-down of these assets.

Also, during the fourth quarter of 2000, the net unamortized Seattle Silicon
goodwill of $2.3 million was written off as the Company decided not to pursue
further development on commercial production of the products and technology
that the goodwill was originally established for. ZiLOG also incurred special
charges of $0.1 million for the cancellation of contractual liabilities and
$5.5 million for severance benefits, which includes $2.0 million of non-cash
stock option compensation. Of the approximately $3.5 million cash payments for
severance benefits, $2.1 million and $0.5 million was paid in 2001 and 2000,
respectively. The Company made the remaining payments in 2002. In connection
with this action, approximately 86 employees were terminated, including 5
senior vice presidents, with continuation payments through the length of such
senior vice presidents' employee agreements.

During the third quarter of 2000, ZiLOG incurred a special charge of $1.5
million of in-process research and development resulting from the acquisition
of Calibre, Inc.

During the second quarter of 2000, ZiLOG incurred special charges of $1.2
million relating to a restructuring of its Communications segment. In
connection with this action, approximately 24 employees were terminated and 12
other employees were transferred into the Communications segment from other
areas of the Company. The $1.2 million charge included $0.9 million for
severance and benefits, $0.1 million of non-cash stock option compensation,
$0.1 million for write-off of impaired assets, and $0.1 million for
contractual liabilities. As of December 31, 2001, approximately $0.1 million
was accrued for payment of severance and termination benefits.

The following table details special charges accrual activity for eight months
ended December 31, 2002, four months ended April 30, 2002, and for the years
December 31, 2001 and 2000 (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                              Severance and
                                               Termination           Lease            Debt            MOD III
                                              Charges Costs       Termination    Restructuring    Closure Benefits       Total
<S>                                            <C>                <C>              <C>                  <C>             <C>
Balance at December 31, 1999............       $      --          $   --           $    --              $   --          $    --
   Total special charges................              6.5             0.2               --                  --             6.7
   Cash paid............................             (1.2)           (0.1)              --                  --            (1.3)
    Deferred stock compensation.........             (2.0)            --                --                  --            (2.0)
Balance at December 31, 2000............              3.3              0.1              --                  --             3.4

Total charge to special charges.........              6.8             3.2               4.3                1.4            15.7
   Cash paid............................             (4.5)           (0.5)             (3.2)              (1.2)           (9.4)
Balance at December 31, 2001............              5.6             2.8               1.1                0.1             9.7

Total charge to special charges.........              1.2             0.7               4.0                2.3             8.2
   Cash paid............................             (6.0)           (3.0)             (2.5)              (2.3)          (13.8)
Balance at April 30, 2002...............              0.8             0.5               2.6                0.2             4.1

Total charge to special charges.........              1.3            (0.2)              1.0                0.9             3.0
   Cash paid............................             (1.6)           (0.3)             (3.6)              (1.0)           (6.5)
Balance at December 31, 2002............        $     0.5         $    --           $    --             $  0.1          $  0.6
</TABLE>



Special charges, charged to expense is the, eight months ended December 31,
2002, four months ended April 30, 2002, and for the years ended December 31,
2001, and 2000, are as follows (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                ----------------  -------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Successor
                                                                     Company                     Predecessor Company
                                                                ----------------  -------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Eight months      Four  months          Years Ended Dec. 31,
                                                                      Ended            Ended          -----------------------------
                                                                 Dec. 31, 2002     April 30, 2002       2001                 2000
                                                                 ---------------   ---------------    -----------------------------
        Asset impairments:
<S>                                                              <C>                 <C>              <C>               <C>
           Austin, Texas assets................................  $     --            $       1.7      $     --          $     --
           Internal use software...............................        --                    0.8            1.5               --
           Goodwill write-offs.................................        --                    0.2            2.1               2.3
           Test and probe equipment written-off................        --                    --             1.4               6.9
           Campbell, California assets.........................        --                    --             1.5               --
           Impairment of MOD III assets........................        --                    --            30.4               0.1
        Restructuring of operations:
           Employee severance and termination benefits.........        1.3                   1.2            6.8               4.5
           MOD III closure costs...............................        0.9                   2.3            1.4               --
           Lease termination costs.............................       (0.2)                  0.7            3.2               0.2
           Stock-based compensation............................        --                    --             1.7               2.0
        Professional fees for debt restructuring...............        1.0                   4.0            4.3               --
        Purchased in-process research and development..........        --                    --              --               1.5
        Other..................................................       (0.2)                  --              --               --
                                                                 ---------------   ---------------    -------------    ------------
                                                                 $     2.8           $      10.9      $    54.3         $    17.5
                                                                 ===============   ===============    =============    ============

</TABLE>




NOTE 8.         CREDIT FACILITY

Upon consummation of the Reorganization Plan, ZiLOG entered into a senior
secured financing facility (the "Facility") with a commercial lender (the
"Lender"), dated May 13, 2002, for a new three-year $15.0 million senior
secured revolving credit facility. Borrowings on the Facility bear interest at
a rate per annum equal, at ZiLOG's option, to the commercial lender's stated
prime rate or LIBOR, plus 2.5%. At December 31, 2002, the Company had
borrowings outstanding of $6.9 million at a LIBOR-based rate of 4.4%, but had
no of additional borrowing capacity available under the Facility. The Facility
is scheduled to mature on May 13, 2005. As of December 31, 2002, the Company
had $0.8 million of standby letters of credit issued to vendors under the
Facility.

The Company is only subject to certain financial covenants under this Facility,
including tangible asset and fixed charge coverage ratio, if the total of
the Company's cash, cash equivalents and availability on the revolver are less
than $7.5 million at any month end.

Prior to the consummation of the Reorganization Plan, ZiLOG had entered into
senior secured revolving line of credit and capital equipment credit facility
with the same Lender on December 30, 1998, which has been replaced by the
current Facility.



NOTE 9.          SENIOR SECURED NOTES PAYABLE

Until consummation of the Reorganization Plan, the Company had $280 million
9.5% senior secured notes ("the Notes") outstanding with a maturity date of
March 1, 2005. Interest was payable semi-annually on the first of March and
September. Since ZiLOG did not make its scheduled semi-annual interest payment
on September 4, 2001 of $13.3 million, the Notes became callable by the
noteholders.

Accordingly, beginning with the third quarter of 2001, the Company
reclassified its indebtedness under the senior notes from a long-term
liability to a current liability on the consolidated balance sheet. ZiLOG
continued to accrue interest, including associated penalties, amounting to
approximately $27.2 million at April 30, 2002. As described in Note 2, the
Reorganization Plan filed on February 28, 2002 and confirmed on April 30, 2002
resulted in extinguishment of the Notes and all related accrued interest.

Issuance costs associated with the senior notes of approximately $9.9 million
were deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the Notes.
Upon default of the Notes in the fourth quarter of 2001, the Notes became
immediately due and payable at the option of the holders, and accordingly, the
Company charged the remaining debt issuance cost balance of $4.2 million to
interest expense.

NOTE 10.        RETIREMENT AND PENSION PLANS

The Company has an employee savings plan that qualifies as a deferred salary
arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "401(k)
Plan"). Under the 401(k) Plan, participating U.S. employees may defer a
portion of their pretax earnings, up to the Internal Revenue Service annual
contribution limit. The Company may make matching contributions on behalf of
each participating employee in an amount equal to 100% of the participant's
deferral contribution, up to 1.5% of the participant's compensation on a
quarterly basis. The Company may also make additional discretionary
contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan
were approximately $0.3 million for the eight month period ended December 31,
2002, $0.2 million for the four month period ended April 30, 2002, and $0.6
million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. There were no discretionary contributions made for 2002, 2001 or
2000.

During the second quarter of 2001, ZiLOG's Board of Directors cancelled the
Company's Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), which allowed certain
management employees to defer their receipt of selected amounts of
compensation. These deferrals were transferred to a third party Trustee for
investment purposes. The third party Trustee paid out the deferred
compensation to the affected employees upon termination of the Plan.

The Company's Philippines subsidiaries maintain a defined benefit pension plan
for local employees, which is consistent with local statutes and practices.
This benefit plan had no material impact on the Company's financial statements
for the periods presented.



NOTE 11.         STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Post Reorganization:

Common Stock. The following description summarizes information regarding
ZiLOG's capital stock after confirmation of the Reorganization Plan as
described in Note 2. This information is subject in all respects to applicable
provisions of ZiLOG's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
its amended and restated bylaws.

General. Our authorized capital stock consists of 40,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The holders of outstanding shares of common
stock are entitled to receive dividends or distributions as may be lawfully
declared by the board of directors. In the event that the corporation is
dissolved, the holders of common stock would be entitled to share ratably in
all assets that may be available for distribution after the satisfaction of
our liabilities. The Common Stock has no preemptive or conversion rights and
is not subject to redemption. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully
paid and non-assessable.

Voting. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock must approve all matters brought before the
stockholders, except as otherwise required by the Delaware General Corporation
Law and except as otherwise set forth below.

Until May 13, 2005, we are required to obtain approval of at least two-thirds
of our outstanding stock entitled to vote and the unanimous approval of our
board to change provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation which provide that we:

o        obtain approval of Joseph Colonnetta or his successor to the board of
         directors for us to authorize MOD III, Inc. to effect a liquidation
         if the proceeds are less than a certain amount as set forth in the
         certificate;

o        reserve 4,558,140 shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant to
         our 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which amount constitutes 14%
         of our equity on a fully-diluted basis, and no more than 14% of our
         equity securities, on a fully diluted basis, shall be issued or
         reserved for issuance for executive or employee incentive
         compensation unless approved by a majority of the outstanding stock
         entitled to vote and by our board of directors; and

o        reserve $3,100,000 for loans to be made pursuant to the terms of our
         2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which amount shall not be
         increased without the approval of two-thirds of our board of
         directors.

         Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also
         provides that the composition of the board and the manner in which
         the directors shall be elected, may not be amended until the earliest
         of:

o        sale of substantially all of ZiLOG's operating assets;

o        consummation of an underwritten public offering of equity securities,
         the aggregate proceeds of which equal or exceed $25,000,000;

o        a change in control;

o        May 13, 2004; or

o        the unanimous approval of such change by the board of directors and
         approval by a majority of the stockholders

Pre-Reorganization:

Common stock: Holders of Common Stock were entitled to one vote per share on
all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Approval of matters brought
before the stockholders required the affirmative vote of a majority of the
holders of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, except as otherwise
required by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL").
Holders of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock did not have any voting rights,
except the right to vote as a class to the extent required by DGCL.

Except for differences in voting rights described above, the rights, powers,
preferences, and limitations of the Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common
Stock were identical. Subject to the rights of holders of Series A Stock and
other classes and/or series of preferred stock, if any, all shares of Common
Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common Stock were entitled to share in such
dividends as the Board may from time to time declare from sources legally
available therefore. Subject to the rights of creditors and holders of Series
A Stock and other classes and/or series of preferred stock, if any, holders of
Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common Stock were entitled to share
ratably in a distribution of assets of the surviving corporation upon any
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of a surviving corporation. At April
30, 2002 and at December 31, 2001, 32,017,272 shares of Common Stock and
10,000,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock were issued and
outstanding. Under the Reorganization Plan, all currently outstanding shares
of Common Stock were cancelled. See Note 2.

Preferred stock: The Board had the authority to issue, from time to time, by
resolution and without any action by stockholders, up to 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $100.00 per share, in one or more classes and/or
series and may establish the powers, designations, preferences, rights and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions (which may differ with respect to
each such class and/or series) of such class and/or series. The Board adopted
a resolution on February 26, 1998, providing for the creation of series A
cumulative preferred stock ("Series A Stock"). On February 28, 1998, the Board
issued 250,000 shares of series A stock, which is a non-voting 13.5% preferred
stock with a par value of $100.00 per share.

The series A stock l accumulated dividends at the rate of 13.5% per annum
(payable quarterly) for periods ending on or prior to February 27, 2008, and
15.5% per annum thereafter. Dividends were payable, at the election of the
Board but subject to availability of funds and the terms of the Notes in cash
or in kind through corresponding increase in the liquidation preference (as
described below) of the Series A Stock. The Series A Stock had an initial
liquidation preference of $100.00 per share.

To the extent that a quarterly dividend payment in respect to a share of
series A stock was not made in cash when due, the amount of such unpaid
dividend accumulated (whether or not declared by the Board) through an
increase in the liquidation preference of such share of series A stock equal
to the amount of such unpaid dividend, and compounded dividends will
accumulate on all such accumulated and unpaid dividends. The liquidation
preference was to be reduced to the extent that previously accumulated
dividends are thereafter paid in cash. The Company was required to pay in cash
all accumulated dividends that have been applied to increase the liquidation
preference on February 27, 2008 (the "Clean-Down").

Shares of Series A Stock were redeemable at the option of the Company, in
whole or in part, at 100% of par value, if redeemed after February 25, 2003,
in each case of the sum of (i), the liquidation preference thereof, increases
to the extent that accumulated dividends thereon shall not have been paid in
cash, plus (ii) accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date of
redemption. Redemption of shares of the series A stock prior to February 26,
2003 was to be at a premium to par value based on a declining scale as
follows: 103.5% after August 25, 1999; 103.0% after February 25, 2000; 102.5%
after August 25, 2000; 102.0% after February 25, 2001; 101.5% after August 25,
2001; 101% after February 25, 2002 and 100.5% after August 25, 2002. Optional
redemption of the series A stock was to be subject to, and expressly
conditioned upon, certain limitations under the notes.

In certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a change of control at
the Company, but again subject to certain limitations under the notes, the
Company might have been required to repurchase shares of series A stock at
101% of the sum of the liquidation preference thereof, increased to the extent
that accumulated dividends thereon shall not have been paid in cash, plus
accumulated and unpaid dividends to the repurchase date.

Holders of series A stock did not have any voting rights with respect thereto,
except for (i) such rights as are provided under the DGCL, (ii) the right to
elect, as a class, one director of the Company in the event that the Company
fails to comply with its Clean-Down or repurchase obligations, and (iii) class
voting rights with respect to transactions adversely affecting the rights,
preferences or powers of the series A stock and certain transactions involving
stock that ranks junior in payment of dividends, or upon liquidation, to the
series A stock. At April 30, 2002, and at December 31, 2001, 250,000 shares of
series A cumulative preferred stock were issued and outstanding. Under the
Reorganization Plans all currently outstanding shares of series A cumulative
preferred stock were cancelled.

Deferred stock compensation: The Company has recorded deferred stock
compensation of $7.9 million in the eight months ended December 31, 2002. For
the eight month period ended December 31, 2002, ZiLOG recognized $2.9 million
of stock-based compensation expense primarily in connection with the award of
restricted stock, during May 2002 to certain employees, executives and
consultants at exercise prices below their deemed fair market value for
accounting purposes at the date of grant. The Company's right to repurchase
these restricted shares for $0.01 per share generally lapses 25% on the award
date and 25% on each of the first three anniversaries following the award date.
Compensation expense for employee stock awards was measured on the award date
and will be recognized over each of the next three years as these restrictions
lapse. Charges for stock awards to consultants will be measured as the awards
vest and will be recognized over the periods that the restrictions lapse. Based
on the employee stock and option award grants the Company made during May 2002,
ZiLOG anticipates that it will recognize stock compensation charges of $2.0
million, $1.8 million and $0.8 million for the years ending December 31, 2003
through 2005, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2000, in connection with a planned public
offering of the Company's common stock, management determined that the Company
had issued stock options to employees having exercise prices below the deemed
fair value for financial reporting purposes of the common shares on the date
of grant. Accordingly, ZiLOG recorded deferred stock compensation of $2.2
million, representing the excess of the deemed fair value of the common shares
on the date of grant over the options' exercise price. Deferred compensation
expense is generally being amortized ratably over the four-year option-vesting
period. Stock option compensation expense related to these options totaled
approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively.

In addition, the vesting periods on certain stock options were accelerated for
employees subject to the reduction in force during the second quarter of 2001
and the second and fourth quarters of 2000 (See Note 7). Accordingly, the
unamortized intrinsic value of $2.0 million and $1.7 million for these options
were recorded as a special charge during the years ended December 31, 2000 and
December 31, 2001, respectively.

2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan:

Common Stock. In May 2002, the 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus
Plan") was adopted by the Board. Subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms
of the Omnibus Plan, the committee may grant options to purchase up to an
aggregate of 2,116,279 shares of common stock under the Omnibus Plan. Stock
options granted under the Omnibus Plan may be: (1) incentive stock options or
non-qualified stock options; (2) EBITDA-linked options and or non-EBITDA
linked options. The term of an option is determined by the committee at the
time of grant, but will not exceed ten years.

Each EBITDA-linked option will be immediately exercisable on the date of grant
and cliff-vest on the sixth anniversary from the date of grant. Vesting can be
accelerated for EBITDA-linked options based on the "adjusted EBITDA," as
defined, reported for the immediately preceding 12-month period as follows:
(1) one-third if the Company reports adjusted EBITDA for the previous 12
months in excess of $17.2 million; (2) two-thirds if the Company reports
adjusted EBITDA for the previous 12 months in excess of $25.7 million; and (3)
100% if the Company reports adjusted EBITDA for the previous 12 months in
excess of $30.0 million.

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines, EBITDA
figures presented in this document represent a non-GAAP measure of liquidity.
EBITDA reflects net income adjusted for non-cash items, interest and income
taxes. Management uses a separate "adjusted EBITDA" calculation for purposes
of determining certain employees' incentive compensation and, subject to
meeting specified adjusted EBITDA amounts, for accelerating the vesting of
EBITDA-linked stock options. This measure of adjusted EBITDA was approved as
part of the Reorganization Plan. Adjusted EBITDA, excludes interest, income
taxes, effects of changes in accounting principles and equity adjustments and
non-cash charges such as depreciation, amortization, in-process research and
development, and stock-based compensation expense. It also excludes cash and
non-cash charges associated with reorganization items and special charges
which represent operational restructuring charges, including asset write-offs,
employee termination costs, and lease termination costs. The differences
between EBITDA and our adjusted EBITDA relate to the following cash-settled
reorganization and special items that are added-back in adjusted EBITDA
computations:

o Employee retention bonuses, severance pay and termination benefits;
o Professional fees for debt restructuring;
o Lease termination costs;
o Termination and exit charges, and
o MOD III closure costs.

For the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2002, the Company's adjusted
EBITDA, as defined, totaled $23.6 million. Accordingly, one-third of the
EBITDA-linked options vested, which represent options to purchase 538,352
shares of common stock out of a total of 1,615,057 EBITDA-linked options
granted, net of cancellations. In no event will any EBITDA-linked options vest
later than May 15, 2008, even if these adjusted EBITDA thresholds have not
been satisfied. The per share exercise price of shares purchasable under an
EBITDA-linked option is $2.76 and each such option will be exercisable for ten
years after the date such option is granted, unless earlier terminated.

In general, non-EBITDA-linked options granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan
will be exercisable at such time or times, and subject to such other terms and
conditions (including the vesting schedule, period of exercisability and
expiration date) as the committee determines, in the applicable award
agreements or thereafter. The exercise price per share payable upon the
exercise of an option will be established by the committee, in its sole
discretion, at the time of grant.

When an optionee exercises an option before the option is vested, then the
optionee will receive shares of restricted stock equal to the number of shares
exercised. If the optionee terminates employment or service before the
restrictions on the restricted stock have lapsed, then the Company has the
right to repurchase these shares as described below.

Restricted Stock. The Company may grant up to 2,441,861 restricted shares of
common stock under the Omnibus Plan. The restricted shares generally contain
restrictions that lapse as to 25% of the shares on the date of grant and that
lapse as to an additional 25% on each of the first, second and third
anniversaries of such grant date. These restricted shares generally may be
repurchased by the Company, until the restrictions have lapsed, at $0.01 per
share if the grantee ceases to be employed by the Company; and also may be
repurchased by the Company at fair market value even after the restrictions
lapse under certain circumstances. With respect to restricted shares acquired
upon exercise of an unvested option, however, the Company may repurchase the
unvested shares at the exercise price and the vested shares at the fair market
value of the shares on the repurchase date.

The Omnibus Plan authorizes the committee to make loans available to
participants with respect to certain restricted stock awards for the payment of
any federal or state income tax attributable to the restricted stock subject to
the award. As of September 30, 2002, the Company had loaned an aggregate of
$2.2 million to employees that were the recipients of the restricted stock
grants. While the committee may award restricted stock in the future, as a
result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company no longer will offer
loans to employees. At December 31, 2002 employee loans outstanding aggregated
$2.0 million.

As of December 31, 2002, there were 564,882 shares of common stock subject to
repurchase at fair value and 1,141,083 shares subject to repurchase at the
greater of the outstanding loan amount or $0.01 per share. The number of
shares of common stock indicated as outstanding also excludes 529,395 shares
of common stock to be granted to James M. Thorburn, the Company's Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to his employment agreement, of which
176,465 shares are to be granted on each of May 13, 2003, May 13, 2004 and May
13, 2005.

On October 18, 2002, the Board of Directors amended the Omnibus Plan to
provide, among other things, that no further restricted shares be issued under
the Omnibus plan (other than those already reserved for particular plan
participants) and that the shares which had formerly been allocated for
restricted shares be allocated to future grants of stock options.

1998 stock plans: In August 1998, the ZiLOG, Inc. Long-Term Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") and the ZiLOG, Inc. 1998 Executive Officer Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Executive Plan"), jointly referred to as the "1998 Plans," were
adopted by the Board. Under the 1998 Plans, the Company may grant eligible
employees, directors and consultants restricted shares, stock units and
nonstatutory and incentive stock options. Options under the 1998 Plans
generally have a life of 10 years and vest at a rate of 25% on each of the
first four anniversaries following the option grant date. The terms and
conditions of each option or stock award under the 1998 Plans are determined
by a committee of the Board and are set forth in agreements between the
recipient and the Company. At April 30, 2002 and at December 31, 2001, 4.65
million and 6.75 million shares have been reserved for issuance. Approximately
2,637,000 and 4,235,000 options have been granted, net of cancellations, under
the Plan and the Executive Plan, respectively at April 30, 2002. Approximately
2,669,000 and 4,400,000 options have been granted, net of cancellations, under
the Plan and the Executive Plan, respectively, at December 31, 2001. Under the
Reorganization Plan, all option grants under the Plan and the Executive Plan
were cancelled and so were the plans. See Note 2.

2000 stock plan: In February 2001, the ZiLOG, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
("2000 Plan") was adopted by the Board. Under the 2000 Plan, the Company may
grant eligible employees, directors and consultants restricted shares, stock
units and nonstatutory and incentive stock options. Options under the 2000
Plan have a maximum life of 10 years and vest at a rate of 25% on the first
anniversary of the date of the grant and ratably each month for the following
three (3) years. The terms and conditions of each option stock award under the
2000 Plan are determined by a committee of the Board and are set forth in
agreements between the recipient and the Company. A total of 3.0 million
shares were reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan. No grants were awarded
under the 2000 Plan as of April 30, 2002 and as of December 31, 2001. Under
the Reorganization Plan, the 2000 stock plan was cancelled. See Note 2.

A summary of the Company's activity for all stock plans for the eight month
period ended December 31 2002, the four month period ended April 30, 2002, and
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 are as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Shares Available        Options         Weighted-Average
                                                                  for Grant           Outstanding       Exercise Price
                                                               ----------------      ------------      ----------------
<S>                                                              <C>                 <C>                <C>
The 1998 and 2000 Plans (Predecessor)
Balance as of January 1, 2000.........................            3,301,949           7,271,001             $2.96

   Additional shares reserved.........................            3,300,000                  --                --

   Options granted....................................           (3,282,899)          3,282,899              5.58

   Shares granted.....................................             (425,000)                 --              0.00

   Options exercised..................................                   --            (382,393)             2.50

   Options cancelled..................................            1,165,960          (1,165,960)             3.77
                                                               ----------------      ------------
Balance as of December 31, 2000.......................            4,060,010           9,005,547              3.83

   Options granted....................................             (247,815)            247,815              6.00

   Options exercised..................................                   --             (60,613)             1.72

   Options cancelled..................................            2,694,019          (2,694,019)             4.08
                                                               ----------------      ------------
Balance as of December 31, 2001.......................            6,506,214           6,498,730              3.83

   Options cancelled (See Note 2).....................           (6,506,214)         (6,498,730)             3.83
                                                               ----------------      ------------
Balance as of April 30, 2002..........................                   --                  --
                                                               ================      ============

2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Successor)

   Options and shares reserved........................            4,558,140                  --                --

   Restricted shares granted..........................           (1,862,465)                 --             $0.01

   Shares reserved for future grants to CEO as
   restricted stock...................................             (529,395)                 --              0.01

   Options granted....................................           (2,098,667)          2,098,667              2.74

   Restricted shares repurchased......................              156,500                  --              1.33

   Options cancelled..................................              227,016            (227,016)             2.76
                                                               ----------------      ------------
Balance as of December 31, 2002.......................              451,129           1,871,651             $2.71
                                                               ================      ============
</TABLE>



The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Options Outstanding                              Options Exercisable
                                     -------------------------------------------------------     -------------------------------
                                                        Weighted-Average
                                        Number             Remaining        Weighted-Average       Number       Weighted-Average
    Range of Exercise Prices          Outstanding       Contractual Life     Exercise Price      Exercisable    Exercise Price
-------------------------------      -------------     ------------------   ----------------     -----------    ----------------
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>                 <C>               <C>                   <C>
           $2.03-$2.03                   115,978              9.80                $2.03               --              $0.00
           $2.76-$2.76                 1,755,673              9.37                $2.76             572,628           $2.76
                                     -------------     ------------------   ----------------     -----------    ----------------
           $2.03-$2.76                 1,871,651              9.40                $2.71             572,628           $2.76
                                     =============     ==================   ================     ===========    ================

</TABLE>

Options that were exercisable as of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were
572,628, 4,268,584, and 3,726,909, respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted in the eight
months ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $1.98, $0.95, and $1.24
per share, respectively. No options were granted in the four months ended
April 30, 2002. The fair value of options granted in 2002 under the 2002
Omnibus Plan were estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes
option pricing model; and the fair value of the options granted in 2001 and
2000 under the 1998 Plans were estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes Minimum Value Method option-pricing model for private companies
applying the following weighted average assumptions:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                               Successor                  Predecessor
                                                                Company                     Company
                                                           ------------------     -----------------------------
                                                           Eight Months Ended          Year Ended December 31,
                                                            December 31, 2002          2001              2000
                                                           ------------------     -----------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>                  <C>               <C>
Annual average risk free interest rate...............              3.0%                 3.5%              5.0%
Estimated life in years..............................               5                    5                 5
Dividend yield.......................................              0.0%                 0.0%              0.0%
Stock price volatility...............................             89.9%                 N/A               N/A

</TABLE>


NOTE 12.        PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

As described in Note 11, before ZiLOG's Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock
("Series A Stock") was cancelled pursuant to the Reorganization Plan, these
shares accumulated dividends at a rate of 13.5% per annum, with dividends
payable quarterly at the election of the Board of Directors. Unpaid dividends
are recognized as a charge to accumulated deficit and as an increase in the
liquidation preference of the Series A Stock. As of April 30, 2002, the
Company had not paid any dividends on the Series A Stock and the corresponding
accrued dividends are approximately $18.5 million were included, in
liabilities subject to compromise. During the four-month period ended April
30, 2002, $1.9 million of dividends on Series A Stock were accrued and charged
to accumulated deficit. As of the effective date of the Reorganization Plan,
all accumulated dividends were extinguished in accordance with the plan.


NOTE 13.        MINORITY INTEREST

As of December 31, 2002, minority interests of approximately $30.0 million are
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in order to reflect the share of
MOD III, Inc. held by minority investors. The minority interest share
represents their entitlement to receive an aggregate liquidation preference of
the first $30.0 million plus any accrued but unpaid dividends on the MOD III,
Inc. series A preferred stock from the net proceeds from the sale of the MOD
III, Inc. assets currently held for sale. The Company will be entitled to
recoup from the net proceeds of any sale all costs it has or will incur to
sell the facility or to maintain the facility in saleable condition subsequent
to its closure and prior to transfer of title.


NOTE 14.        NET LOSS PER SHARE

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per
share of common stock (in millions, except per share data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        Successor
                                                                         Company
                                                                       ------------
                                                                          Eight
                                                                          Months
                                                                        Ended Dec.
                                                                         31, 2002
                                                                       ------------
<S>                                                                      <C>
        Net loss......................................................   $   (26.0)
                                                                       ============
        Weighted-average shares outstanding...........................        29.6
        Less: Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase...........         1.0
                                                                       ------------
        Weighted-average shares used in computing basic
            and diluted net loss per share............................        28.6
                                                                       ============
        Basic and diluted net loss per share..........................
                                                                        $    (0.91)
                                                                       ============
</TABLE>


At December 31, 2002, options to purchase 1.9 million shares of common stock
are excluded from the determination of diluted net loss per share, as the
effect of such shares is anti-dilutive.




NOTE 15.         INCOME TAXES


The components of income (loss) before tax for the eight months ended December
31, 2002, four months ended as April 30, 2002 and years ended December 31, 2001
and December 31, 2000, are as follows (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Successor Company                Predecessor Company
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Eight Months ended      Four Months       Year Ended December
                                               December 31,       ended April 30,             31,
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   2002                2002           2001          2000
                                                   ----                ----           ----          ----
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>           <C>            <C>
 United States............................        ($24.1)             $276.1        ($125.7)       ($55.4)
 Foreign..................................          (0.3)               (0.1)          (1.8)         (2.5)
                                                  ------              ------         ------        ------
                                                  ($24.4)             $276.0        ($127.5)       ($57.9)
                                                  ======              ======         ======        ======
</TABLE>


The provision for income taxes is as follows (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Successor Company                Predecessor Company
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Eight Months ended      Four Months       Year Ended December
                                               December 31,       ended April 30,             31,
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2002                2002           2001          2000
                                                  ----                ----           ----          ----


<S>                                              <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
 Federal, Current.......................         $4.8                 $ --           $ --          $ --
             Deferred...................         (4.0)                  --             --            --
                                                 ----                 ----            ----          ----
                                                  0.8                  0.0             0.0          0.0

 State, Current.........................          1.0                  0.1             0.2           --
           Deferred.....................         (0.7)                  --             --            --
                                                 ----                 ----            ----          ----
                                                  0.3                  0.1             0.2          0.0

 Foreign, Current.......................          0.5                   --             0.3           --
             Deferred...................          --                    --             --           0.3
                                                  0.5                  0.0             0.3          0.3
                                                 ----                 ----            ----          ----
 Provision for income taxes                      $1.6                 $0.1            $0.5          $0.3
                                                 ====                 ====            ====          ====
</TABLE>






The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying
the statutory income tax rate to income before taxes. The source and tax
effects of the differences are as follows (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Successor Company                Predecessor Company
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Eight Months ended      Four Months       Year Ended December
                                                                  December 31,       ended April 30,             31,
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     2002               2002           2001          2000
                                                                     ----               ----           ----          ----
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C>           <C>           <C>
 Computed expected benefit.................................        ($8.3)              $93.8         ($42.1)       ($16.9)
 State taxes, net of federal benefits......................          0.2                 0.1            0.1            --
 Foreign taxes.............................................          0.5                  --            0.3           0.3
 MOD III impairment........................................          --                   --           10.7            --
 Calibre goodwill impairment...............................          --                   --            0.7            --
 Foreign losses not benefited..............................          0.2                  --            0.7            1
 Losses for which no current year benefit is recognized....          --                  3.5           30.0          15.8
 Non-taxable income, discharge of debt.....................          --                (69.9)           --             --
 Fresh-start accounting income.............................          --                (28.5)           --             --
 In-process R&D and other intangible assets................          6.4                  --            --             --
 Stock-based compensation..................................          1.0                  --            --             --
 Non-deductible items......................................          1.3                 1.1            --             --
 Other                                                                .3                  --            0.1           0.1
                                                                    ----                ----           ----          ----
                                                                    $1.6                $0.1           $0.5          $0.3
                                                                    ====                ====           ====          ====
</TABLE>



Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components
of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in
millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Successor             Predecessor
                                                             -----------------      -----------------
                                                                            December 31,
                                                             -----------------      -----------------
                                                                     2002                  2001
                                                             -----------------      -----------------
<S>                                                             <C>                  <C>
        Deferred tax liabilities............................
               Fixed assets.................................        (8.4)             $  (10.0)
               Intangible assets............................        (7.3)                     --
               Other assets.................................        (6.7)                     --

        Deferred tax assets
              Net operating losses carryforward.............        --                    77.3
              Accruals not currently deductible.............        17.6                   4.2
              Inventory valuation adjustments...............         3.8                   7.2
              Tax credit carryforward.......................        --                     9.1
              Prepaid expenses and other....................         0.2                   0.3
                                                             -----------------      -----------------
                                                                    21.6                  98.1
        Deferred tax asset valuation allowance..............       (21.6)                (88.1)
                                                             -----------------      -----------------
        Deferred income taxes............................... $     (22.4)            $     --
                                                             =================      =================
</TABLE>


Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, which are
uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance, in an amount equal to the gross
deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2002 has been established to reflect
this uncertainty. The valuation allowance decreased by approximately $66.5
million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. This net decrease was
attributable to utilization of net operating losses and tax credits
carryforwards and reduction in tax basis of certain assets during 2002
relating to the bankruptcy reorganization. As part of the bankruptcy
reorganization approximately $205 million of net gain on discharge of debt was
recognized. The Company had net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards
available to offset a significant portion of this income. The remaining
portion of approximately $38 million of net gain further reduced the Company's
tax basis in certain assets. The deferred tax effects of this reduction in tax
basis at December 31, 2002 were recorded as a deferred tax liability and a
corresponding increase in goodwill. The valuation allowance as of December
31, 2002 is primarily attributable to the deferred tax assets existing at
fresh-start accounting. The future realization of these fresh-start accounting
deferred tax assets will first be credited to remaining goodwill.

The Company had no remaining federal or California net operating loss
carryforwards or credits at December 31, 2002. The Company also accounts for
any income tax contingencies in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 5 "Accounting for Contingencies". As of December 31,
2002, these income tax contingencies totaled $14.5 million and are reflected
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as other long-term liabilities.



NOTE 16.        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases, which expire in 2003 through 2007. The
facility lease agreements generally provide for base rental rates which
increase at various times during the terms of the leases and also provide for
renewal options at fair market rental value.

Minimum future lease payments under these non-cancelable leases at December
31, 2002 are as follows (in millions):

                                                                  Operating
                                                            -------------------
                                                                    Leases
                      2003...............................        $     1.8
                      2004...............................              1.4
                      2005...............................              1.2
                      2006...............................              1.1
                      2007...............................              0.1
                                                             ------------------
                      Total minimum lease payments.......        $     5.6
                                                             ==================

The Company is also responsible for common area maintenance charges on certain
office leases, which are not included in the above table. These charges are
generally less than 10% of base rents. Total operating lease expense,
including month-to-month rentals, was approximately $1.7 million, $1.2
million, $6.9 million, and $7.36 million for the eight month period ended
December 31, 2002, the four month period ended April 30, 2002, and for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

On July 29, 1996, we filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of
California in and for Santa Clara against Pacific Indemnity Company, Federal
Insurance Company and Chubb & Son Inc. In that action, we sought a declaration
that our former insurers, Pacific and Federal, had an unconditional duty to
defend and indemnify us in connection with two lawsuits brought in 1994: (1)
in Santana v. ZiLOG and, (2) in Ko v. ZiLOG. Our complaint in the Santa Clara
County action also alleged that Chubb, which handled the defense of Santana
and Ko on behalf of Pacific and Federal, was negligent. Pacific
cross-complained against us, seeking reimbursement of defense costs for both
underlying lawsuits and a payment it contributed to the settlement of Ko.
According to its cross-complaint, Pacific sought a total of approximately $6.3
million, plus interest and costs of the suit.

On February 26, 2002, we agreed to make a payment of $300,000 to fully settle
these lawsuits. This payment was made in four equal installments with the last
payment (plus interest) to be  made in February 2003.

On June 14, 2002, Gemplus SA filed a proof of claim under the Company's Chapter
11 proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court of Northern California for approximately
$1.5 million based on an alleged breach by the Company under a Development
Agreement dated July 27, 2000. Management intends to vigorously contest
Gemplus's claim. However, if this matter is resolved in a manner adverse to the
Company, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition.

We are participating in other litigation and responding to claims arising in
the ordinary course of business. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously in
these matters. Our management believes that it is unlikely that the outcome of
these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial statements,
although there can be no assurance in this regard.

NOTE 17.        RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Over the past three years, we have entered into several contracts with
affiliates of Texas Pacific Group, which is an affiliate of our former
majority stockholder. Since the Reorganization Plan became effective, we are
no longer affiliated with Texas Pacific Group.

In January 1999, ZiLOG entered into an agreement with P.T. Astra Microtronics
Technology, now known as Advanced Interconnect Technologies, pursuant to
which, AIT provides us with semiconductor assembly and test services through
January 2003. AIT is owned by Newbridge Asia, an affiliate of Texas Pacific
Group. The Company purchased services from AIT totaling approximately $1.1
million during the four-month period ended April 30, 2002, and approximately
$6.3 million and $17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. ZiLOG had payments due to AIT of approximately $0.4 million at
April 30, 2002 and approximately $0.5 million and $1.5 million at December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively. Payment terms with AIT are net 30 days.

ZiLOG sells products and engineering services to GlobeSpan, of which Texas
Pacific Group is a significant stockholder. Net sales to GlobeSpan totaled
approximately $0.8 million during the four-month period ended April 30, 2002,
and approximately $6.0 million and $9.2 million for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Receivables from GlobeSpan were approximately
$0.7 million at April 30, 2002 and approximately $0.3 million and $2.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Payment terms
between GlobeSpan and ZiLOG are net 30 days.

During 2001, ZiLOG's present Chief Executive Officer, Jim Thorburn, was
functioning as the Company's Acting Chief Executive Officer pursuant to a
consulting agreement with Texas Pacific Group. Under the agreement, Mr.
Thorburn was paid $3,000 per day, plus out-of-pocket expenses. In 2001, ZiLOG
paid Mr. Thorburn consulting fees of $574,000 pursuant to this agreement.

In connection with the Reorganization Plan, ZiLOG entered into three
agreements with TPG Partners II, L.P., a Texas Pacific Group affiliate, each
of which was dated January 28, 2002. First, ZiLOG entered into a mutual
release agreement pursuant to which ZiLOG and MOD III, Inc. released TPG and
its affiliates, and TPG and its affiliates released ZiLOG and MOD III, Inc.,
from any respective claims that one may have against the other which arose
prior to the effective date of the Reorganization Plan and which relate to
this relationship. Second, ZiLOG entered into a non-solicitation and non-hire
agreement with TPG Partners II with respect to James M. Thorburn, the
Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Third, ZiLOG entered into a
tax agreement in which TPG Partners II made acknowledgments and covenants that
preclude it from taking actions that could result in their recognizing certain
tax losses until 2002, such as selling their stock.

ZiLOG has entered into employment agreements with each of its named executive
officers. In June 2002, loans were made to executive officers to pay the
income taxes due on the restricted shares of common stock that were granted to
them pursuant to the employment agreements. ZiLOG also made loans to officers
other than our named executive officers for an amount equal to the income
taxes due on the restricted shares of common stock that were granted to them.
Pursuant to full-recourse promissory notes, ZiLOG loaned the following amounts
to the following officers: $61,689 to Edward Bradley; $68,544 to Roy Douglass;
$68,544 to Norman Sheridan; $78,059 to Tom Vanderheyden; $16,727 to David
Fritz; $20,563 to Thomas Hamilton; $13,709 to John Kros; $13,709 to John
Rodman; $59,833 to Richard White; and $55,000 to David Bauman, a contractor.
Each of these loan recipients pledged their shares of restricted stock as
collateral for these loans pursuant to stock pledge agreements. All such loans
come due five years from the date of issuance and they bear interest at 5.5%
per annum. Interest is payable annually on February 28 for the preceding year
end of December 31.

On May 17, 2002, we sold 90,580 shares of common stock to Federico Faggin, a
member of ZiLOG's board of directors, for $2.76 per share, or an aggregate
$250,000. On the date of this sale, the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board quoted
the closing sale at $6.25 per share. The Company does not believe that this
quoted price reflected the common stock's fair market value because ZiLOG's
common stock, at that time, was thinly traded and ZiLOG had just emerged from
bankruptcy.


NOTE 18.        GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

Beginning in May 2002, ZiLOG consolidated its business segments into one
reportable segment to reflect the change in the manner in which its chief
operating decision maker allocates resources and assesses the performance of
the Company's business. The Company engages primarily in the design,
development, manufacture and marketing of semiconductor products. The Company
sells its products to distributors and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
in a broad range of market segments. The Company's operations outside the
United States consists of a final test facility in the Philippines, sales and
support centers and design centers in certain foreign countries. Domestic
operations are responsible for the design, development and wafer fabrication
of all products, as well as the coordination of production planning and
shipping to meet worldwide customer commitments. The Philippine test facility
is reimbursed in relation to value added with respect to test operations and
other functions performed, and certain foreign sales offices receive a
commission on export sales within their territory. Accordingly, for financial
statement purposes, it is not meaningful to segregate sales or operating
profits for the test and foreign sales office operations.

Prior to the consummation of the Company's reorganization, there were two
reportable business segments called communications and embedded control. The
prior reporting structure was based on a previous operating and reporting
organization that was focused largely on development of new products targeted
on the communications and networking sectors. ZiLOG is now organized and
focused on its core business, which is based on 8-bit micrologic product
solutions. The Company operates in one reporting segment and engages primarily
in the design, development, manufacture and marketing of semiconductor
products. ZiLOG has two broad business lines called embedded control and
standard products within the Company's one reportable segment.

The Company's two broad business lines are based on product technologies and
can be summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Products                                                       Sample Uses
         --------                                                       -----------
<S>                                                                     <C>
         Embedded control products include:
                                                                        Security systems, battery chargers, Universal
                                                                        Infra-red remote controls, industrial
                                                                        controllers. POS terminal, motor control,

         Core 8-bit Microcontrollers and Microprocessors                communications products
         Standard products include:
            Serial Communications Controllers                           Telephone switches/PBX
            Modems                                                      Satellite TV set-top box, POS card validation
            IrDA transceivers                                           PDA's, cell phones
            Television and PC peripheral products                       TV, keyboard, pointing device
            Foundry product services                                    Broadband access products
</TABLE>

Prior reporting periods have been restated to reflect the Company's decision
to operate in one reportable segment as of May 1, 2002 in the following table,
which summarizes ZiLOG's net sales by region, by channel, and by business line
(in millions of dollars):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Successor      --------------------------------------------------------
                                          Company                         Predecessor Company
                                        -------------    --------------------------------------------------------
                                        Eight Months         Four Months           Year               Year
                                         Ended Dec.             Ended             Ended               Ended
                                          31, 2002          Apr. 30, 2002     Dec. 31, 2001        Dec. 31, 2000
                                        -------------    ----------------     -------------        -------------
<S>                                      <C>                 <C>               <C>                 <C>
Net sales by region:
Americas                                 $  55.9              $    25.2          $  87.0           $    137.2
Asia                                        26.8                   13.8             64.6                 80.4
Europe                                      10.9                    7.0             20.7                 21.6
                                        -------------    ---------------      -------------        -------------
    Total                                $  93.6              $    46.0          $ 172.3           $    239.2
                                        =============    ===============      =============        =============
Net sales by channel:
OEM                                      $  52.7              $    25.8          $ 105.4           $    142.7
Distribution                                40.9                   20.2             66.9                 96.5
                                        -------------    ----------------     -------------        -------------
    Total                                $  93.6              $    46.0          $ 172.3           $    239.2
                                        =============    ===============      =============        =============
Net sales by business line:
Embedded Control                         $  61.2              $    29.1          $  98.2           $    134.9
Standard Products                           32.4                   16.9             74.1                104.3
                                        -------------    ----------------     -------------        -------------
    Total                                $  93.6              $    46.0          $ 172.3           $    239.2
                                        =============    ===============      =============        =============
</TABLE>


Net sales are attributable to the ship-to location of ZiLOG's customers as
presented in the following table (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Successor                                Predecessor
                                                    -------------      --------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Eight Months        Four Months
                                                       Ended                Ended                       Year Ended
                                                       Dec. 31,           April 30,                     December 31,
                                                    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         2002                2002                2001                2000
                                                    ----------           ----------           ----------          ----------
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>                 <C>                  <C>
United States..................................       $  43.8             $  17.6             $     59.6           $ 110.9
Hong Kong (including PRC)......................           7.5                 3.3                   17.1              26.9
Canada.........................................           6.7                 3.4                    8.8               8.8
Mexico.........................................           5.4                 4.2                   18.3               1.3
Singapore......................................           5.8                 2.6                   11.3              12.9
Taiwan.........................................           6.1                 1.9                    5.7               9.7
Other foreign countries........................          18.3                13.0                   51.5              68.7
                                                    ----------           ----------           ----------          ----------
      Total....................................       $  93.6             $  46.0             $    172.3           $ 239.2
                                                    ==========           ==========           ==========          ==========
</TABLE>


The following table shows the location of long-lived assets (in millions):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Successor         Predecessor
                                                             ------------       ------------
                                                             December 31,       December 31,
                                                             ------------       ------------
                                                                 2002                2001
                                                             ------------       ------------
<S>                                                            <C>                <C>
      United States (including corporate assets)........       $113.7             $  44.0
      Philippines.......................................          0.6                 1.5
      Other.............................................          0.3                 0.3
                                                             ------------       ------------
          Total.........................................       $ 114.6            $  45.8
                                                             ============       ============
</TABLE>


Major customers: For the eight month period ended December 31, 2002, the four
month period ended April 30, 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2001
and 2000, respectively, one distributor, Pioneer-Standard Electronics,
accounted for approximately 14.0%, 10.5%, 12.6% and 11.5% of net sales,
respectively. The relationship with Pioneer-Standard Electronics was
terminated in the fourth quarter of 2002.


NOTE 19.        CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk, consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments
and trade accounts receivable. By policy, the Company places its investments
only with high credit quality financial institutions. Almost all of the
Company's trade accounts receivable are derived from sales to electronics
distributors and original equipment manufacturers in the areas of computers
and peripherals, consumer electronics, appliances and building controls. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and limits its exposure to accounting losses by limiting the amount
of credit extended whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require
collateral. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposures
related to its customers.



<PAGE>




                                   PART III

ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information regarding individuals who currently
serve as our directors or executive officers. Each director will hold office
until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is
elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and
serve at the Board's discretion. The executive officers listed below serve on
our Executive Council, which meets periodically to advise the CEO concerning
certain matters.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

        Name                             Age                      Position
        ----                             ---                      --------
<S>                                      <C>         <C>
Michael D. Burger...............         44          President and Director
Joseph Colonnetta...............         41          Director
Bruce Diamond...................         43          Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Federico Faggin.................         61          Director
Perry J. Grace..................         45          Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Daniel M. Jochnowitz............         41          Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Richard L. Sanquini.............         68          Director
James M. Thorburn...............         47          Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
</TABLE>

James M. Thorburn. James M. Thorburn was appointed Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board, and a director in January 2002. Between March 2001 and
January 2002, Mr. Thorburn was appointed as our acting Chief Executive Officer
and President in connection with a consulting agreement between Mr. Thorburn
and Texas Pacific Group, an affiliate of our former principal stockholder.
From August 1999 to March 2001, Mr. Thorburn was Senior Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer of ON Semiconductor. From May 1998 until August 1999,
Mr. Thorburn served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Prior to May 1998, Mr. Thorburn was the Vice President of Operations Finance
at National Semiconductor. During his 17-year career at National
Semiconductor, Mr. Thorburn held various executive positions. Mr. Thorburn
holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from the University of
Glasgow, Scotland and is a qualified accountant with the Institute of
Chartered Management Accountants. Mr. Thorburn is a Group III director subject
to re-election in 2005.

Michael D. Burger. Michael D. Burger was appointed President and a director in
January 2002. Between March 2001 and March 2002, Mr. Burger served as
Executive Vice President and General Manager of our Connecting Technology
Business Unit. Mr. Burger joined ZiLOG in November 1998 as Senior Vice
President of Worldwide Sales. From December 1997 to October 1998, Mr. Burger
was Vice President of Worldwide Marketing and Sales at QuickLogic Corporation.
Prior to QuickLogic, Mr. Burger was the Vice President and Managing Director
for National Semiconductor Asia based in Hong Kong. Mr. Burger holds a
Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from New Mexico State
University. Mr. Burger is a graduate of Stanford's Executive Management
Program. Mr. Burger is a Group II director and subject to re-election in 2004.

Joseph Colonnetta. Joseph Colonnetta was appointed as a director by the
informal committee of certain of the holders of our cancelled senior notes
upon effectiveness and pursuant to the terms of our plan of reorganization on
May 13, 2002. Mr. Colonnetta has served as a Principal of Hicks, Muse, Tate &
Furst Incorporated since January 1999. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Colonnetta
served as a Managing Principal of a management affiliate of Hicks, Muse, Tate
& Furst Incorporated. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Colonnetta was an Operating
Partner and Chief Executive Officer of Triangle FoodService and StarMark
Foods. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Colonnetta was the Chief Financing Officer of
TRC, a company specializing in repositioning and growing food-related
companies. Mr. Colonnetta is also a Director of Cooperative Computing, Inc.,
Home Interiors & Gifts, Grupo Minsa, Safeguard Systems and Talon Automotive,
Inc. Mr. Colonnetta holds a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from the
University of Houston. Mr. Colonnetta is a Group III director subject to
re-election in 2005.

Federico Faggin. Federico Faggin was appointed as a director upon
effectiveness of our plan of reorganization on May 13, 2002. Mr. Faggin
co-founded Synaptics and has served as the Chairman of the Board of Synaptics
since January 1999. Mr. Faggin served as a director and the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Synaptics from March 1987 to January 1999. Mr.
Faggin also co-founded Cygnet Technologies, Inc. in 1982 and ZiLOG, Inc. in
1974. Mr. Faggin served as Department Manager in Research and Development at
Intel Corporation from 1970 to 1974 and led the design and development of the
world's first microprocessor and more than 25 integrated circuits. In 1968,
Mr. Faggin was employed by Fairchild Semiconductor and led the development of
the original MOS Silicon Gate Technology and designed the world's first
commercial integrated circuit to use such technology. Mr. Faggin is also a
director of Integrated Device Technology, Inc., a publicly-traded producer of
integrated circuits; Avanex Corp., a publicly-traded producer of fiber
optic-based products, known as photonic processors; Foveon, Inc., a
privately-held company; and Blue Arc Corporation, a privately-held
corporation. Mr. Faggin is the recipient of many honors and awards including
the 1988 International Marconi Fellowship Award, the 1994 IEEE W. Wallace
McDowell Award, and the 1997 Kyoto Prize. In addition, in 1996, Mr. Faggin was
inducted in the National Inventor's Hall of Fame for the co-invention of the
microprocessor. Mr. Faggin holds a doctorate in physics, summa cum laude, from
the University of Padua, Italy. Mr. Faggin also holds an honorary doctorate
degree in computer science from the University of Milan, Italy. Mr. Faggin is
a Group II director subject to re-election in 2004.

Richard L. Sanquini. Richard L. Sanquini was elected as a director in August
2002. Mr. Sanquini is currently a consultant for Synaptics Incorporated,
Foveon, Inc., National Semiconductor, and several privately held companies.
From January 1999 to November 1999, Mr. Sanquini served as Senior Vice
President and General Manager of the Consumer and Commercial Group of National
Semiconductor; from April 1998 to December 1998, he served as Senior Vice
President and General Manager of the Cyrix Group of National Semiconductor;
from November 1997 to March 1998, he served as Senior Vice President and
General Manager of the Personal Systems Group of National Semiconductor; from
April 1996 to October 1997, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer of the Corporate Strategy, Business Development, and
Intellectual Property Protection Group of National Semiconductor; and from
December 1995 to March 1996, he served as Senior Vice President of the
Business Development and Intellectual Property Protection Group of National
Semiconductor. Prior to National Semiconductor, he was with RCA where he
directed its memory and microprocessor businesses. Mr. Sanquini also has been
a director of Foveon, Inc. since August 1997. Mr. Sanquini holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of
Engineering, Wisconsin. Mr. Sanquini is a Group I director subject to
re-election in 2003.

Bruce Diamond. Bruce Diamond was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer in November 2002. From January 2001 to October 2002, Mr.
Diamond served as President and Chief Operating Officer for Sipex, Inc., an
analog semiconductor company. From October 1997 to December 2000, Mr. Diamond
served as Sr. Vice President Operations for ANADIGICS, Inc., an RF-based
semiconductor IC company. From June 1982 to October 1997, Mr. Diamond held
various senior positions within National Semiconductor including engineering,
and operations positions. Mr. Diamond holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
electrical engineering from the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.

Perry J. Grace. Perry J. Grace was appointed as our Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer in July 2001. From June 1999 to January 2001, Mr. Grace
served as Controller and then Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer for Ramp Networks, an Internet security appliance provider acquired by
Nokia in January 2001, for whom he assisted in the post-merger integration
through May 2001. Prior to Ramp Networks, Mr. Grace was employed by National
Semiconductor from 1987 to 1999, where he held several finance and controller
positions and by PriceWaterhouse from 1980 to 1987 in Melbourne, Australia,
London, England, and San Jose, California, where he served as an audit
manager. Mr. Grace holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and
Finance, Commercial Law, and Computer Science from Deakin University in
Geelong, Australia, and was admitted to the Institute of Chartered Accountants
in Australia in 1983.

Daniel M. Jochnowitz. Daniel M. Jochnowitz was appointed as our Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary in June 2001. From January 2000 to
April 2001, Mr. Jochnowitz served as Senior Corporate Counsel for Inktomi
Corporation. From May 1999 to January 2000, Mr. Jochnowitz was self-employed
as an independent consultant providing legal, financing, structuring and
business advice in connection with a variety of infrastructure,
telecommunications, and entertainment projects, among others. From March 1999
to May 1999, Mr. Jochnowitz was the Senior Division Counsel for Global
Infrastructure for Edison Capital. From March 1997 to March 1999, Mr.
Jochnowitz also was self-employed as an independent consultant. Earlier in his
career, Mr. Jochnowitz was Senior Vice President and General Counsel for BHP
Power, a division of BHP. He also worked for O'Melveny & Meyers; Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy; and Milgrim Thomajan & Lee PC. After graduating from
law school, he clerked for the Honorable William E. Doyle of the Tenth Circuit
Court of Appeals in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Jochnowitz received a Bachelor of
Arts degree and a Juris Doctorate from Columbia University.


ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements

In connection with our plan of reorganization, we entered into a two-year
employment agreement, dated January 7, 2002, with our Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman, James M. Thorburn. This agreement provides that: (1) Mr.
Thorburn will be employed as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and will
be paid an annual salary of $800,000; (2) Mr. Thorburn will be eligible to
earn an annual incentive payment in an amount between 25% and 200% of his
annual base salary based on our annual EBITDA; (3) on the effective date of
the plan of reorganization, Mr. Thorburn will be eligible to receive up to 4%
of the shares of our common stock in options and restricted stock; and (4) Mr.
Thorburn will receive a signing bonus of $650,000 upon the fulfillment of
certain conditions. These conditions were met as of February 28, 2002 and the
signing bonus was paid to Mr. Thorburn on March 8, 2002.

Mr. Thorburn's employment agreement automatically terminates on the second
anniversary of the Effective Date. In the event that, before such second
anniversary, we terminate Mr. Thorburn's employment without cause, or Mr.
Thorburn resigns at any time for good reason, we shall pay to Mr. Thorburn the
greater of (a) 180% Mr. Thorburn's base salary, or (b) Mr. Thorburn's base
salary for the balance of the term of the agreement plus an additional amount
equal to 80% of Mr. Thorburn's base salary for the balance of the term of the
agreement. For the purposes of this employment agreement, "cause" means one or
more of the following: (i) Mr. Thorburn's material breach of the agreement;
(ii) Mr. Thorburn's failure to reasonably and substantially perform his duties
under the agreement; (iii) Mr. Thorburn's willful misconduct or gross
negligence which materially injures us; or (iv) Mr. Thorburn's conviction or
plea of nolo contendere to (A) a felony, or (B) other serious crime involving
moral turpitude. Also for the purposes of this agreement, "good reason" means
a material diminution in Mr. Thorburn's duties and responsibilities set forth
in his employment agreement.

If Mr. Thorburn decides to terminate his employment with us, with or without
good reason, within thirty days following a change of control, we shall pay
Mr. Thorburn the balance of his then current base salary for the remainder of
the term of his employment agreement plus an amount equal to 80% of Mr.
Thorburn's then current base salary. In addition, we will accelerate the
vesting on all stock, stock options and other stock awards held by Mr.
Thorburn.

Other Executive Officers. We entered into three-year employment agreements
with each of our other executive officers. Our employment agreements with
Gerald J. Corvino (Mr. Corvino resigned effective November 1, 2002), Perry J.
Grace and Daniel M. Jochnowitz were entered into on April 9, 2002. Each of
these agreements was subject to the approval of the board of directors and
provided for the immediate termination of the agreement if our plan of
reorganization was not confirmed. Our plan of reorganization was confirmed by
the bankruptcy court on April 30, 2002 and each of these agreements was
ratified by the board of directors. These agreements therefore became
effective as of April 9, 2002. Our employment agreement with Michael D. Burger
was entered into and was effective on May 14, 2002. Each of these employment
agreements will continue for a term of three years and will be automatically
renewed for additional terms of one year, unless we or the executive provides
written notice of no less than six months prior to the end of the term of
intent not to renew, and unless otherwise terminated as set forth below. We
are in the process of finalizing an employment agreement with Mr. Diamond.

As set forth in the following table, each employment agreement provides that
the executive is entitled to a base salary, and a bonus equal to a range of
his annual base salary based on our annual adjusted EBITDA, a specified number
of shares of restricted stock and EBITDA-Linked stock option grants under our
2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. Also as set forth in the table, in June
2002, each executive received a loan from us for an amount equal to the income
taxes due on shares of restricted shares of common stock granted to them
pursuant to a full-recourse promissory note. The executives, in turn, pledged
the shares of restricted stock as collateral for this loan pursuant to a stock
pledge agreement.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        Employment Agreement Summary
       Name                  Annual Salary    Annual Bonus(1)    Restricted Stock        Options           Loan
       ----                  -------------    ---------------    ----------------        -------           ----
<S>                           <C>               <C>                   <C>                <C>            <C>
Michael D. Burger             $ 400,000         0 / 25/ 75            500,000            120,000        $ 685,438
Gerald J. Corvino (2)         $ 350,000         0 / 25 / 75           283,000             90,000        $ 387,958
Perry J. Grace                $ 225,000         0 / 20 / 60           200,000             90,000        $ 274,175
Daniel M. Jochnowitz          $ 205,000         0 / 20 / 60           130,000             20,000        $ 178,214
</TABLE>

------------------------------
(1)   Annual bonus expressed as a percentage of annual salary to which the
      executive will be entitled to receive in the event that the company
      reaches adjusted EBITDA milestones for the relevant year of: less than
      $18 million / $18 million / $34 million or higher. For purposes of
      illustration, if the company has $20 million of annual adjusted EBITDA
      (as defined in the plan), Mr. Jochnowitz will earn 20% of his annual
      salary, or $41,000, as a bonus. These percentages and milestones apply
      for each of the first two years of the agreement term; after the first
      two years, the milestones will be set by the board.
(2)   As set forth below under the section entitled "Corvino Resignation," Mr.
      Corvino resigned his position effective November 1, 2002. Pursuant to
      the letter agreement between the company and Mr. Corvino, Mr. Corvino
      retained 141,500 shares of restricted stock. The remaining 141,500
      shares were repurchased by the Company and the 90,000 options were
      cancelled.


      Each employment agreement also provides to the executive: all rights and
      benefits for which he is eligible under the terms of benefits and
      compensation plans which may be in effect from time to time, such as our
      401(k) plan; four weeks' vacation; and reimbursement of reasonable
      business expenses.

      Under these employment agreements, if we terminate the executive's
      employment for Cause or as a result of his death or Disability, on the
      date of termination, such executive's salary and benefits will cease and
      all stock options and other stock awards held by such executive will
      cease vesting and will be exercisable only pursuant to the terms of the
      applicable stock option plans and agreements.

      In the event that we terminate one of these executive's employment
      without cause, or such executive resigns at any time for good reason, we
      will be obligated to pay such executive an amount equal to 100% of his
      base salary. For the purposes of these employment agreements, "cause"
      means one or more of the following: (i) the executive's material breach
      of his agreement; (ii) the executive's failure to reasonably and
      substantially perform his duties under his agreement; (iii) the
      executive's willful misconduct or gross negligence which materially
      injures us; (iv) the executive's conviction or plea of nolo contendere
      to (A) a felony or (B) another serious crime involving moral turpitude.
      Also for purposes of these agreements, "good reason" means a material
      diminution in such executive's duties and responsibilities set forth in
      his employment agreement.

      In the event that one of these executives terminates his employment with
      us, with or without good reason, within 30 days following a change in
      control, we will be obligated to pay such executive an amount equal to
      his then-current base salary. In addition, we will accelerate the
      vesting on all stock, stock options and other stock awards held by the
      executive.

Compensation of Directors

Each of our non-employee directors receives, as compensation for his or her
service as a director:

         o        $30,000 per year, which may be paid, at the election of such
                  director, in any combination of cash and options to purchase
                  shares of our common stock equal to $30,000 divided by the
                  fair market value of a share of our common stock at the time
                  of grant which will vest quarterly over one year;

         o        $1,000 for each regularly scheduled meeting of the board of
                  directors at which the member appears in person, and a
                  nominal amount for each meeting that is held telephonically,
                  which may be paid, at the election of such director, in any
                  combination of cash or options to purchase shares of our
                  common stock equal to the amount of such cash fee divided by
                  the fair market value of a share of our common stock at the
                  time of grant;

         o        options to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock on each
                  anniversary of his or her appointment or election as a
                  director, as the case may be; and

         o        options to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock upon
                  appointment or election as a director, as the case may be.

All stock options granted in 2002 had an exercise price of between $2.03 and
$2.76 per share.

Compensation to the directors for their service as directors is not paid
pursuant to consulting contracts. We have entered into a separate consulting
arrangement with Mr. Faggin, however, pursuant to which Mr. Faggin will devote
approximately 20% of his business time (i.e. one day per week) providing
services to us which may include strategy guidance, assistance with project
roadmaps, management counseling and participation in customer and internal
service reviews. As consideration for these consulting services, our board of
directors granted 145,000 restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Faggin, on
which the restrictions lapse pro rata over a period of 24 months, pursuant to
our 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. See "2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan"
below.
Our employee directors currently do not receive any compensation for their
service on our board of directors.

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

Our compensation program for officers is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, which is currently composed of Mr.
Colonnetta and Mr. Sanquini.

Our compensation policy for executive officers is designed to support the
overall objective of enhancing value for shareholders by attracting,
developing, rewarding and retaining highly qualified and productive
individuals, relating compensation to both our performance and individual
performance, and ensuring compensation levels that are externally competitive
and internally equitable.

The key elements of our current executive officer compensation consist of base
salary, a cash bonus, stock options and restricted stock for executive
officers. The Compensation Committee's policies with respect to each of these
elements, including the bases for the compensation awarded to Mr. Thorburn,
are discussed below. In addition, while the elements of compensation described
below are considered separately, the Compensation Committee takes into account
the full compensation package afforded by us to the individual, including
insurance and other benefits.

Prior to January 2002, Mr. Thorburn was paid pursuant to a contract between
TPG Partners II, L.P., and Mr. Thorburn. Under this contract, Mr. Thorburn was
paid by us $3,000/per day, plus reimbursement for reasonable expenses.

The Committee reviews each officer's salary annually. In determining
appropriate salary levels, consideration is given to scope of responsibility,
experience, Company and individual performance, as well as pay practices of
other companies relating to executives with similar responsibility.

Mr. Thorburn's compensation was negotiated with the informal committee of
bondholders and approved under our plan of reorganization. This is reflected
in Mr. Thorburn's employment agreement. Subsequently, Mr. Thorburn's agreement
was amended to reflect a reduction in the amount of the restricted stock and
options to which he was originally entitled. This amendment was approved by
the Board of Directors.

In addition, in January 2003, Mr. Thorburn and the Compensation Committee
agreed that in light of the current economic situation, Mr. Thorburn's base
salary would be reduced from $800,000 to $675,000, per annum. This reduction
became effective February 1, 2003, and continues until the Company achieves
net sales of $30 million in any quarter. Any bonuses, however, would still be
based on Mr. Thorburn's original base salary.

Our officers may be considered for annual cash bonuses, which are awarded
based on our meeting certain financial goals. For the 12-month period ended
December 31, 2002, adjusted EBITDA, as defined, totaled $21.5 million.
Accordingly, our financial performance goals were met for the executive
officers. Consequently, the executive officers (other than Mr. Diamond)
received a bonus based upon this financial performance in the year 2002.
However, pursuant to an agreement with each of the executive officers, only
one half of the bonus was paid. The other half of the bonus will only be paid
if (a) we achieve a minimum of $32 million of sales revenue in any quarter in
2003, or (b) the executive officer leaves us for any reason. In addition, if
we achieve a minimum of $32 million of sales revenue in any quarter in 2003,
the executive officers will get an additional bonus equal to 25% of the full
bonus earned with respect to 2002. Mr. Thorburn and other executive officers
that remained employed by us in the first quarter of 2001 received the
long-term components of bonuses earned by them in 1998 and 1999.

Under the ZiLOG 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, restricted shares and stock
options may be granted to the Company's employees, including executive
officers, directors and consultants. Grants are determined by the Compensation
Committee after recommendation by the Company's management, and the number of
options or shares granted under either plan is determined by the subjective
evaluation of the person's ability to influence the Company's long-term growth
and profitability.

Because the value of an option bears a direct relationship to the Company's
stock price, it is an effective incentive for employees to create value for
shareholders. The Committee therefore views stock units, stock options and
restricted stock as an important component of its compensation policy.


Compensation Committee Members:

/s/   Joseph Colonnetta, Chairman
/s/   Richard Sanquini


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation
Decisions

In 2002, after the Restructuring, the compensation committee was comprised of
Joe Colonnetta and Dick Sanquini. There were no Compensation Committee
Interlocks as that term is defined under Item 402 (j) of Regulation S-K as
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, among the
committee members. The Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Vice President
and the General Counsel provided staff to support this committee. None of the
Chairman of the Company, the Executive Vice President nor the General Counsel
participated in the deliberations concerning their own respective
compensation.


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our Chief Executive
Officers and the four other most highly compensated executive officers
(although Gerald J. Corvino resigned from ZiLOG on November 1, 2002, his
compensation data is included in the table below as Bruce Diamond was not
appointed to his position until November 5, 2002, and his compensation was
minimal), who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2002,
2001, and 2000, (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                Long-Term
                                                       Annual Compensation                  Compensation Awards
                                           -------------------------------------------   --------------------------
                                                                                                        Securities
                                                                                          Restricted    Underlying     All Other
        Name and                                                          Other Annual   Stock Awards    Options/      Compensa-
  Principal Position              Year       Salary           Bonus       Compensation        (2)        SARs (#)       tion (4)
-----------------------------     ----     -----------   --------------   ------------   -------------  ------------  -------------

<S>                                <C>      <C>           <C>               <C>        <C>              <C>           <C>
James M. Thorburn                  2002     $ 769,235     $ 650,000(14)     $    --    $  485,279       209,140       $   3,000
   Chairman and Chief              2001       574,000         --                 --        --            --               8,743 (5)
   Executive Officer               2000          --           --                 --        --            --                --

Michael D. Burger                  2002       386,539       225,000(1)           --     1,375,000       120,000            --
   President and Director          2001       281,087       204,416              --        --            54,500(3)          828 (8)
                                   2000       217,493         --                 --        --             --               --

Gerald J. Corvino (6)              2002       352,696       180,000(1)           --       778,250        90,000(6)        3,000
   Executive Vice President        2001       280,074       204,316(13)          --        --            49,500(3)      293,663 (9)
   and Chief Operating             2000       222,778            --              --        --              --           133,650 (7)
   Officer

Perry J. Grace (10)                2002       225,000        67,500(1)           --      550,000         90,000            --
   Vice President and Chief        2001        88,702        95,950(11)          --        --            --                --
   Financial Officer               2000          --           --                 --        --            --                --

Daniel M. Jochnowitz  (12)         2002       200,100        54,000 (1)          --      375,500         20,000           3,000

   Vice President, General         2001        92,977        47,760 (13)         --        --            30,000 (3)       1,523
   Counsel and Secretary           2000          --           --                 --        --             --               --
</TABLE>

---------------------------------
(1)  Represents a retention bonus.
(2)  Represents gain on purchase of restricted stock; the excess of fair
     market value over the exercise price.
(3)  All of these options were cancelled upon the effectiveness of our plan
     of reorganization on May 13, 2002.
(4)  Unless otherwise indicated, amounts represent our matching contributions
     to the 401(k) plan.
(5)  Represents Deferred Compensation Plan distribution. Under our Deferred
     Compensation Plan, participants could elect to defer up to a maximum of
     100% of their salary and bonuses. At the end of each year, we credited
     matching and profit sharing contributions, if any, equal to (a) the
     amounts that we would have made under our 401(k) plan taking into account
     the amounts deferred under this plan, but disregarding, for purposes of
     calculating our contributions, certain limitations on contributions
     prescribed by applicable tax law, minus (b) the amounts actually credited
     for the year as matching and profit sharing contributions under our
     401(k) plan. Deferrals and contributions were credited to participants'
     accounts and were deemed to earn investment gains or losses generally
     based on the investment vehicles that participants selected from among
     those chosen for this purpose by the committee administering the plan.
     When the plan was terminated in April, 2001, participants' accounts were
     distributed to them. Had the plan not been terminated, distributions
     would have been made pursuant to participants' elections, upon
     termination of employment, attainment of a specified age or the later of
     the two, in the form of a lump sum or annual installments.
(6)  Gerald J. Corvino resigned his position effective November 1, 2002 and
     his 90,000 stock options were cancelled after his right to exercise
     expired..
(7)  Represents realized gain on the exercise of 37,500 stock options of
     $131,250 and matching 401K contribution of $2,400
(8)  Represents Deferred Compensation Plan distribution.
(9)  Represents Deferred Compensation Plan distribution of $291,063 and
     matching contributions to the 401(k) plan of $2,600.
(10) Mr. Grace commenced employment with us in July 2001.
(11) Represents a sign-on bonus of $55,000, and a quarterly incentive bonus of
     $40,950.
(12) Mr. Jochnowitz commenced employment with us in June 2001.
(13) Represents quarterly incentive bonus.
(14) Represents a sign-on bonus.

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

The following table sets forth further information regarding option grants to
each of our Named Executive Officers during 2002. In accordance with the rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the table sets forth the
hypothetical gains or "option spreads" that would exist for the options at the
end of their respective ten-year terms. These gains are based on assumed rates
of annual compound stock price, and appreciation of 5% and 10% from the date
the option was granted to the end of the option terms.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Individual Grants
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                    Potential Realized Value At
                                                                                                    Assumed Annual Rates of Stock
                                                                                                    Price Appreciation For Option
                                      Number of       % of Total                                               Term
                                      Securities       Options                                      ------------------------------
                                      Underlying      Granted To     Exercise                            5%                 10%
                                        Option        Employees In     Price       Expiration       ------------
          Name                         Granted        Fiscal Year     ($/SH)           Date              ($)                ($)
------------------------------     -------------     -------------   --------      ----------       ------------       -----------
<S>                                  <C>                 <C>          <C>            <C>            <C>                 <C>
James M. Thorburn.............       209,140 (2)         10.0%        $  2.76        5/15/12        $  363,015          $  919,950
Michael D. Burger.............       120,000 (2)          5.7%           2.76        5/15/12           208,290             527,848
Gerald J. Corvino (1).........        90,000 (2)          4.3%           2.76        5/15/12           156,217             395,886
Perry J. Grace................        90,000 (2)          4.3%           2.76        5/15/12           156,217             395,886
Daniel M. Jochnowitz..........        20,000 (2)          1.0%           2.76        5/15/12            34,715              87,975
</TABLE>
_____________________
(1)   Gerald J. Corvino resigned his position effective November 1, 2002, and
      his options were cancelled after expiration of his right to exercise.
(2)   EBITDA-Linked Options.

Each EBITDA-linked option will be immediately exercisable on the date of grant
and cliff vest on the sixth anniversary from the date of grant. Vesting can be
accelerated for EBITDA-linked options based on the "adjusted EBITDA" as
defined, as follows: (i) one-third if we report twelve-month adjusted EBITDA
in excess of $17.2 million; (ii) two-thirds if we report twelve-month adjusted
EBITDA in excess of $25.7 million; and (iii) 100% if we report twelve-month
adjusted EBITDA in excess of $30 million; provided that all options vest no
later than six years after the effective date of the plan of reorganization.
As of December 31, 2002, one-third of the EBITDA-linked options have vested.
Vesting on options will be accelerated if there is a change of control.


AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND OPTION VALUES AT
DECEMBER 31, 2002

The following table provides information regarding the aggregate option
exercises and fiscal year-end option values for each of the Company's Named
Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2002. Also reported are
values of unexercised "in-the-money" options, which represent the positive
spread between the respective exercise prices of outstanding stock options and
the fair value of our common stock on December 31, 2002, as determined by our
board of directors to be $2.76 per share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                   Number of
                                                                       Securities Underlying             Value of Unexercised
                                                                        Unexercised Options             In-The-Money Options A
                                   Acquired                           At Fiscal Year End (#)              Fiscal Year End ($)
                                   Shares On    Value Realized    --------------------------------------------------------------
               Name              Exercise (#)        ($)          Exercisable     Unexercisable      Exercisable   Unexercisable
------------------------------   ------------   --------------    -----------     -------------      -----------   -------------
<S>                                 <C>          <C>                 <C>              <C>              <C>          <C>
James M. Thorburn.............      --           $   --              69,713           134,427          $  6,274     $   12,548

Michael D. Burger.............      --               --              40,000            80,000             3,600          7,200
Gerald J. Corvino (1).........      --               --                  --               --                 --             --
Perry J.  Grace...............      --               --              30,000            60,000             2,700          5,400
Daniel M. Jochnowitz..........      --               --               6,666            13,334               600          1,200

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Gerald J. Corvino resigned his position effective November 1, 2002, and his options were cancelled after his right to exercise
expired after expiration of his right to exercise.
</TABLE>



ITEM 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of
our common stock by our principal stockholders as of December 31, 2002. This
information has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to:

o   each person known to us to be the owner of more than 5% of any class of
    voting securities;
o   each of our directors and named executive officers; and
o   all directors and executive officers, as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below
is c/o ZiLOG, Inc., 532 Race Street, San Jose, California, 95126. The column
labeled "Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Subject to Options" in the table
below reflects the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of options that
are exercisable within sixty (60) days of December 31, 2002. Asterisks
represent beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our common stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Number of Shares
                                                        Number of Shares       Beneficially Owned        Percentage of
                  Beneficial Owner                     Beneficially Owned      Subject to Options    Outstanding Shares (1)
--------------------------------------------------    --------------------     ------------------    ----------------------
<S>                                                         <C>                    <C>                   <C>       <C>
Capital Research and Management Company (2), (3).....       7,320,000                  --                    24.6%
PW Willow Fund, L.L.C. (4), (5)......................       4,435,000                  --                    14.9%
Michael D. Burger....................................         500,000 (6)          120,000                    2.1%
Joseph Colonnetta....................................            --                 30,870                     *
Bruce Diamond (9)....................................            --                    --                      *
Federico Faggin......................................         235,580 (7)           30,870                     *
Perry J. Grace.......................................         200,000 (6)           90,000                     *
Daniel M. Jochnowitz.................................         130,000 (6)           20,000                     *
Richard L. Sanquini..................................            --                 34,778                     *
James M. Thorburn....................................         176,465 (6)          209,140                    1.3%
All current executive officers and
directors, as a group (8 persons)....................       1,242,045 (8)          535,658                    5.9%
</TABLE>

------------------------------------------------------
(1)   In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the
      percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to
      options held by that person that are currently exercisable or will
      become exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 2002 are deemed
      outstanding, while such shares are not deemed outstanding for purposes
      of computing percentage ownership of any other person. Percentage of
      beneficial ownership is based on 29,796,545 shares of ZiLOG, Inc common
      stock outstanding as of December 31, 2002.
(2)   333 South Hope Street -- 55th Floor
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Attn: Michael J. Downer
(3)   Capital Research and Management Company acts as investment advisor to
      each of the record holders of the shares of common stock: (i) American
      High Income Trust, which owns 3,315,000 shares; (ii) The Bond Fund of
      America, which owns 2,555,000 shares; (iii) The Income Fund of America,
      which owns 910,000 shares; and (iv) American Funds Insurance Series,
      High-Income Bond Fund, which owns 445,000 shares; and (v) American Funds
      Insurance Series, Bond Fund, which owns 95,000 shares. Capital Research
      and Management Company and the respective record holders may be deemed
      to have shared beneficial ownership of these shares.
(4)   c/o UBS Paine Webber Inc.
      1285 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor
      New York, NY 10019
      Attn:  Mark Goldstein
(5)   PW Willow Fund, L.L.C., Bond Street Capital, L.L.C., PW Willow
      Management, L.L.C., PW Fund Advisor, L.L.C., PW Alternative Asset
      Management, Inc. and Sam S. Kim may be deemed to have shared beneficial
      ownership of 4,435,000 shares.
(6)   Restricted shares of common stock.
(7)   145,000 of these shares are restricted shares of common stock.
(8)   1,151,465 of these shares are restricted shares of common stock.
(9)   Bruce Diamond was granted 280,000 stock options on January 16, 2003.


ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

                     EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

           The following is a summary of the shares reserved for issuance
pursuant to outstanding options, rights or warrants granted under our equity
compensation plans as of December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Plan Category              Number of securities to be      Weighted-average exercise         Number of securities
                                     issued upon exercise of          price of outstanding          remaining available for
                                   outstanding options, warrant   options, warrants and rights    future issuance under equity
                                            and rights                                           compensation plans (excluding
                                                                                                    securities reflected in
                                                                                                          column (a))

                                               (a)                            (b)                              (c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>                             <C>                            <C>
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders (1)            1,871,651                       $ 2.71                         980,524
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Total                          1,871,651                       $2.71                          980,524
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The ZiLOG 2002 Omnibus Stock Option Plan was originally approved under the
terms of our plan of reorganization.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of
related party transactions.

ITEM 14.   DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, which we have designed to
ensure that material information related to ZiLOG, including our consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to the persons preparing our periodic reports on a
regular basis. In response to recent legislation and proposed regulations, we
reviewed our internal control structure and our disclosure controls and
procedures. Although we believe our preexisting disclosure controls and
procedures were adequate to enable us to comply with our disclosure
obligations, as a result of such review, in October 2002,we implemented minor
changes, primarily to formalize and document the procedures already in place.

Within 90 days before the filing of this report, the Company's management
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Company's Chief Executive Officer, James Thorburn, and the Company's Chief
Financial Officer, Perry J. Grace, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that
evaluation, Mr. Thorburn and Mr. Grace concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in causing material information to be
collected, communicated and analyzed by management of the Company on a timely
basis and to ensure that the quality and timeliness of the Company's public
disclosures complies with its SEC disclosure obligations.

Changes in Controls and Procedures

There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect these internal controls after
the date of our most recent evaluation.

<PAGE>

                                    PART IV


ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)       The following documents are filed as part of this report:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>       <C>                                                                                           <C>
          1.      Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:

                  Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Auditors............................................. pg. __

                  Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.................................... pg. __

                  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002, May 1, 2002,
                  April 30, 2002, and December 31, 2001................................................ pg. __

                  Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Eight Months Ended
                  December 31, 2002, Four Months Ended April 30, 2002, and for the Years
                  December 31, 2001 and 2000........................................................... pg. __

                  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Eight Months Ended
                  December 31, 2002, Four Months Ended April 30, 2002, and for the Years Ended
                  December 31, 2001 and 2000............................................................pg. __

                  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) as of
                  December 31, 2002, May 1, 2002, April 30, 2002 and for the
                  Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000............................................... pg. __

                  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................................... pg. __

           2.     Financial Statement Schedules

           The Financial Statement Schedule listed below is filed as part of this Report:

                                                                                             Form 10-K
                                                                                                Page
                                                                                                ----

                 Schedule II   Valuation and Qualifying Accounts                                II-1
</TABLE>

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the Financial Statements or the Notes
thereto.

(b)        Reports on Form 8-K None.

(c)        Exhibits
           The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed
or incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this annual
report.

(d)        Financial Statements Schedules
           See Item 14 (a)(2) above.

                                  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

        ZiLOG, INC.


By: /s/ JAMES M. THORBURN                      Date: March 31, 2003
   ------------------------------
        (James M. Thorburn)
        (Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              Signatures                                       Title                                         Date
              ----------                                       -----                                         ----

<S>                                               <C>                                                     <C>
/s/     JAMES M. THORBURN                        Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and
-------------------------------------                          Director                                   March 31, 2003
       (James M. Thorburn)


/s/     MICHAEL D. BURGER                                President and Director                            March 31, 2003
-------------------------------------
       (Michael D. Burger)


/s/     PERRY J. GRACE                         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                  March 31, 2003
-------------------------------------
       (Perry  J. Grace)


/s/     JOSEPH COLONNETTA                                       Director                                   March 31, 2003
-------------------------------------
       (Joseph Colonnetta)


/s/     FEDERICO FAGGIN                                         Director                                   March 31, 2003
-------------------------------------
       (Federico Faggin)


/s/     RICHARD L. SANQUINI                                     Director                                   March 31, 2003
-------------------------------------
       (Richard L. Sanquini)

</TABLE>

<PAGE>




                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, James Thorburn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZiLOG, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003

                                       /s/ James Thorburn
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       James Thorburn
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZiLOG, Inc. and will be retained by ZiLOG, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Perry J. Grace, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZiLOG, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003

                              /s/ Perry J. Grace
                              -----------------------------------
                              Perry J. Grace
                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZiLOG, Inc. and will be retained by ZiLOG, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

 Exhibit Number                                      Description
----------------         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>   <C>                 <C>
      2.1 (a)            Joint Reorganization Plan, as confirmed by order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
                         the Northern District of California, dated April 30, 2002.
      3.1 (b)            Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ZiLOG, Inc.
      3.2 (b)            Amended and Restated Bylaws of ZiLOG, Inc.
      4.1(i)             Form of common stock certificate.
      4.2 (b)            ZiLOG, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
      4.3 (c)            Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement
      4.4 (c)            Form of Non-Qualified EBITDA-Linked Option Grant Agreement
      4.5 (c)            Form of Non-Qualified Non-EBITDA-Linked Option Grant Agreement
     10.1 (d)            Contract of Lease, dated March 22, 1979, by and between ZiLOG Philippines, Inc. and
                         Fruehauf Electronics Phils. Corporation
     10.2 (e)            Distributor Agreement, dated February 2, 2000 by and between Pioneer-Standard
                         Electronics, Inc. and ZiLOG, Inc.
     10.3 (f)            Lease, dated as of December 21, 2001, between ZiLOG, Inc. and the Sobrato Group.

                         NOTE:      Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of item 601 of Regulation S-K,
                                    the registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the Commission upon request
                                    copies of any schedule to the Lease.
     10.4 (g)            Employment Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and James M. Thorburn.
     10.5 (g)            Non-Solicitation and Non-Hire Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc.
                         and TPG Partners II, L.P.
     10.6 (g)            Mutual Release Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc., ZiLOG-MOD III,
                         Inc. and TPG Partners II, L.P.
     10.7 (g)            Tax Agreement, dated January 28, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and TPG Partners II, L.P.
     10.8 (c)            Employment Agreement, dated April 9, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Gerald Corvino.
     10.9 (c)            Employment Agreement, dated April 9, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Perry J. Grace.
     10.10 (c)           Employment Agreement, dated April 9, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Daniel M. Jochnowitz.
     10.11 (c)           Financing Agreement, dated May 13, 2002, between CIT Financing and ZiLOG, Inc.
     10.12 (c)           Contribution Agreement, dated May 13, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc.
     10.13 (e)           Services Agreement, dated May 13, 2002, between ZiLOG Inc. and ZiLOG-MOD III, Inc.
     10.14 (g)           Form of Mutual Release.
     10.15 (c)           Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Michael D. Burger.
     10.16 (c)           Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Thomas Vanderheyden.
     10.17 (c)           Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Norman G. Sheridan.
     10.18 (c)           Consulting Agreement, dated May 17, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Federico Faggin.
     10.19 (c)           Amendment Number 1 to Employment Agreement, dated May 23, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc.
                         and James M. Thorburn.
     10.20 (i)           Distributor Agreement, dated October 23, 2002, between ZiLOG, Inc. and Future Electronics, Inc.
     10.21 (i)           Form of Full-Recourse Promissory Note.
     10.22 (i)           Form of Stock Pledge Agreement.
     10.23 (i)           Letter Agreement between ZiLOG, Inc. and Gerald Corvino dated October 21, 2002.
     10.24               Bonus Agreement dated February 15, 2002 by and between James Thorburn and ZiLOG, Inc.
     10.25               Bonus Agreement dated February 15, 2002 by and between Michael Burger and ZiLOG, Inc.
     10.-26              Bonus Agreement dated February 15, 2002 by and between Perry J. Grace and ZiLOG, Inc.
     10.27               Bonus Agreement dated February 15, 2002 by and between Daniel Jochnowitz and ZiLOG, Inc.
     16.1 (h)            Letter re:  Change in Certifying Accountant.

     21.1                Subsidiaries of ZiLOG, Inc.
     23.1                Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors.
     23.2                Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors.
     99.1                Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                         Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

------------------

(a)   Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed with the
      Commission on May 15, 2002.
(b)   Incorporated herein by reference to the item of the same name filed as
      an exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form S-8 (File No.
      333-88416) filed with the Commission on May 15, 2002.
(c)   Incorporated herein by reference to the item of the same name filed as
      an exhibit to the Company's quarterly report filed with the Commission
      on August 16, 2002.
(d)   Incorporated herein by reference to the item of the same name filed as
      an exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form S-4 (File No.
      333-51203) declared effective by the Commission on July 8, 1998.
(e)   Incorporated herein by reference to the item of the same name filed as
      an exhibit to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2000.
(f)   Incorporated herein by reference to the item of the same name filed as
      an exhibit to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2001.
(g)   Incorporated by reference to the item of the same name filed as an
      exhibit to the Company's current report filed on Form 8-K with the
      Commission on January 30, 2002.
(h)   Incorporated by reference to the item of the same name filed as an
      exhibit to the Company's current report filed on Form 8-K with the
      Commission on December 28, 2001.
(i)   Incorporated by reference to the item of the same name filed as an
      exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form S-1/A (File No.
      333-9829) filed with the Commission on November 5, 2002.

</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         SCHEDULE II

                                                           ZiLOG, INC.
                                                   VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                                             (in millions)

                                                Balance at Beginning    Additions Charged to                  Balance at End of
                 Description                         of Period           Costs and Expenses    Deductions           Period
-----------------------------------------       --------------------    --------------------   -----------    -----------------
<S>                                             <C>                        <C>                   <C>            <C>
Successor Company
    Eight months ended December 31, 2002:
        Allowance for doubtful accounts             $    0.7                $   (0.2)            $    --         $    0.5
        Sales returns and allowances                     1.5                     6.2                (6.1)             1.6
                                               ----------------------- --------------------- ---------------- ------------------
                                                    $    2.2                     6.0                (6.1)             2.1
                                               ======================= ===================== ================ ==================

Predecessor Company
Four months ended April 30, 2002:
   Allowance for doubtful accounts                  $    0.7                $     --            $    --           $    0.7
   Sales returns and allowances                          3.0                     2.4                (3.9)              1.5
                                               ----------------------- --------------------- ---------------- ------------------
                                                         3.7                     2.4                (3.9)              2.2
                                               ======================= ===================== ================ ==================

Year ended December 31, 2001:
   Allowance for doubtful accounts                       0.9                     0.1                (0.3) (1)          0.7
   Sales returns and allowances                          2.9                    10.7               (10.6)              3.0
                                               ----------------------- --------------------- ----------------- -----------------
                                                         3.8                    10.8               (10.9)              3.7
                                               ======================= ===================== ================= =================

Year ended December 31, 2000
   Allowance for doubtful accounts                  $    0.4               $     0.5            $     --            $  0.9
   Sales returns and allowances                          2.9                    16.5               (16.5)              2.9
                                               ----------------------- --------------------- ----------------- -----------------
                                                    $    3.3               $    17.0            $  (16.5)           $  3.8
                                               ======================= ===================== ================= =================
</TABLE>



_________________

(1) Uncollectable accounts written off, net of recoveries.