alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain easements 

held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, 

and to terminate associated contractual arrangements with the Village. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2009 

Mr. COSTELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain easements held by the Secretary on land owned 

by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate 

associated contractual arrangements with the Village. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSO4 CIATED CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS, VIL5 LAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS. 

6 (a) TERMINATION AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

7 Agriculture may terminate any easement held by the Sec8 retary on land owned by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 511 IH

1 and terminate associated contractual arrangements with 

2 the Village. 

3 (b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the ter4 mination of an easement and associated contractual ar5 rangements under subsection (a), the Village of Caseyville, 

6 Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory arrangements 

7 with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 

8 Secretary. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
II 

Calendar No. 232 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Reported by Mrs. LINCOLN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain easements held by the Secretary on land owned 

by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate 

associated contractual arrangements with the Village. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSO4 CIATED CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS, VIL5 LAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS. 

6 (a) TERMINATION AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

7 Agriculture may terminate any easement held by the Sec8 retary on land owned by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 511 RS

1 and terminate associated contractual arrangements with 

2 the Village. 

3 (b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the ter4 mination of an easement and associated contractual ar5 rangements under subsection (a), the Village of Caseyville, 

6 Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory arrangements 

7 with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 

8 Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 232 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to termiments with the Village. and to terminate associated contractual arrange- land owned by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, nate certain easements held by the Secretary on 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-372-CR

TIMOTHY W. MOFFATT	APPELLANT

A/K/A TIMOTHY MOFFATT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Timothy W. Moffatt a/k/a Timothy Moffatt attempts to appeal the trial court’s August 2, 2005 order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.  Because this denial is not an appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Neither the United States nor Texas constitution guarantees the right to appeal state criminal convictions.  Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).  A defendant’s right to appeal is granted only by statute.  Id.  No statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.  See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (mem. op.).

	On October 10, 2005, we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because a direct appeal is not the proper vehicle to attack an order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.  See  Allen v. State, 20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet.).  We informed Appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response with this court showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.

	Appellant has responded, but nothing in his response establishes grounds for continuing this appeal.  We hold that we do not have jurisdiction over Appellant’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.  See Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett, 82 S.W.3d at 735; Allen, 20 S.W.3d at 165.2  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  November 17, 2005
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of China Architectural Engineering, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Luo Ken YiLuo
                Ken YiChief
                Executive Officer
              August
                  31, 2007




/s/
                  Wang XinWang
                  XinChief
                  Financial Officer
              August
                  31, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to China Architectural Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by China
      Architectural Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ferdinand Oppenheimer, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 16, 1936.

*184i *Goldwater & Flynn [John F. Brennan*of counsel], for the trustee of trust funds for the benefit of infants.

■ *Sidney B. Fleisher,*for Maurice S. Goodman, general guardian of Susan, Peggy and Barbara Goodman, infants.

Delehanty, S.

This is an application for a construction of the will and for an order directing the trustee to pay to the general guardian the sum of $1,506.51 from accretions to the trust corpus. Paragraphs fifth and ninth C of the will create a trust for the surviving children of Beatrice O. Goodman until they respectively reach the age of twenty-eight years, when they are to receive the principal. It is provided that “ Meanwhile such child is to receive the income, increase and profits from said trust.”

Heretofore the court authorized the trustee to pay to the guardian for the maintenance of his wards so much of the income as by separate order should be authorized by the court having supervision over the acts of the general guardian. Orders for maintenance and reimbursement so obtained by the general guardian provide for payment to him of $1,506.51 in excess of the income in the hands of the trustee.

The market value of the securities in the trust as of December 5, 1935, show an appreciation in value of $19,393.55 over the original inventory value. The general guardian contends that this is an *“*increase ” and that the use of the word “ increase ” in the above quoted provision entitles him to the payment of the sum of $1,506.51 from these accretions of the trust corpus. No such intent may be attributed to this testator. Throughout the will, wherever it became necessary to refer to income, the expression “ income, increase and profits ” is used. Whenever he so desired, as in the provisions for the primary life beneficiaries, the testator authorized an invasion of the principal “ over and above the income, increase and profits.” *“*Increase ” and “ profits ” as used in this will are redundant words expressing nothing more than the word *“*income.” *(Linsly*v. *Bogert,*33 N. Y. Supp. 975; affd., 87 Hun, 137; affd., 152 N. Y. 646; *Matter of Proctor,*85 Hun, 572; *Matter of Eger,*139 Misc. 59.)

The contention that regardless of the construction placed on the word *“*increase,” the relief sought may be granted as an appli*185cation under section 194 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, is overruled. The will creates a valid trust which is indestructible. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 15; Real Prop. Law, § 103.) Neither the parties interested nor the court may ignore the provisions of the trust as expressed in the will. *(Matter of Wentworth,*230 N. Y. 176; *Metcalf*v. *Union Trust Company,*181 id. 39; *Cuthbert*v. *Chauvet,*136 id. 326; *Douglas*v. *Cruger,*80 id. 15; *Matter of Hull,*141 Misc. 288.)

Submit, on notice, decree construing the will and denying this application for payment.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Board of Visitors, United States Military Academy (USMA)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Board of Visitors, United States Military 
Academy.
    Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2005.
    Place of Meeting: Veterans Affairs Conference room, Room 418, 
Senate Russell Building, Washington, DC.
    Start Time of Meeting: Approximately 10 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Shaun T. Wurzbach, 
United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996-5000, (845) 938-
4200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed Agenda: Organization Meeting of the 
Board of Visitors. Review of the Academic, Military and Physical 
Programs at the USMA. All proceedings are open.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-2054 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
In the MATTER OF: C.S.

No. COA18-450

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

REVERSED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                                                 
|                        |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer (Chief
Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



23
#### Charles SCHULZE and Berner Kellough v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE.

No. 89 C 6912.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois.

Nov. 30, 1990.

Berner Kellough, Darien, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Winston & Strawn, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ASPEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ joint motion to vacate the Court’s May 1, 1990 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 736 F.Supp. 193, and to dismiss the instant lawsuit with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs is allowed. Accordingly, this Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of May 1, 1990 is vacated, and this case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. The status hearing and filing of the joint pretrial order set for December 14, 1990, is stricken.
STATE v. Orlando COOPER

90P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 20, 2019

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Cooper, Orlando.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of March 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of March 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.3 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward F.Gotschall, Vice Chairman - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated March 26, 2002, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CompuCredit Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form 10-K/A.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62012) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation
2000 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78409) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option
Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92889) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
March 26, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CompuCredit Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.

| | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| | ---------------------

Atlanta,
Georgia
October 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00113-CV

IN RE PAT GREEN AND THRELKELD

& COMPANY INSURANCE AGENCY

Original Proceeding

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C202100405

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Pat Green and Threlkeld & Company Insurance Agency sought to 

mandamus the trial court regarding rulings made on motions to transfer venue. By letter 

dated July 6, 2022, Green notified the Court that the parties had reached a settlement and 

would be dismissing the proceeding. No motion to dismiss has been filed. 

By letter dated August 1, 2022, the Clerk of this Court requested a status report 

from Relators regarding the proposed dismissal and notified the parties that if no status 

report was received, within 7 days from the date of the letter, the proceeding would be 

dismissed. More than 7 days have passed, and no status report has been received.
In re Green Page 2

Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 17, 2022

[OT06]
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that: (1) the 10-Q/A
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-Q/A
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.


Date:   August 15, 2008
                                                              By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                                  -------------
                                                                      Jack Chen
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date:   August 15, 2008
                                                             By: /s/ Klaus Shen
                                                                 --------------
                                                                     Klaus Shen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
23.1










Cinnamon
Jang Willoughby & Company





Chartered
Accountants


A
Partnership of Incorporated Professionals











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-139815) of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. of our report
dated March 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-KSB/A.




/s/
Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company


Cinnamon
Jang Willoughby & Company








Burnaby,
Canada


January
20, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Registrants Report on Form 10-KSB for
    the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    Report), fully complies with the applicable
    requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                         



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Michael V. Shustek               
| |                                      
| | Michael V. Shustek                   
| | Chief Executive Officer and President



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ John W. Alderfer   
| |                        
| | John W. Alderfer       
| | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG AB

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31076) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-40936) of Private
Media Group, Inc. of our report dated April 11, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Private Media Group, Inc. as of December
31, 2001, and for each of the two years then ended, in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Stockholm, Sweden

March 28, 2003

Ernst & Young AB


/s/ Tom Bjorklund
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16



                                 Promissory Note


$        140,515.00                    Date     September 30, 2000
 ----------------------------                -----------------------------------

     Five Years after date I promise to pay to the order of U.S. Laboratories,
Inc. One Hundred Forty Thousand Five Hundred Fifteen Dollars Payable at U.S.
Laboratories, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., San Diego, CA 92111 For value received with
interest at xxxxxxx per cent per annum.
            -------



                                                    /s/ Dickerson Wright
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Dickerson Wright, Personally
                                              ----------------------------------

Witness
         /s/ Don Alford
----------------------------------
__________________________________

No.          1                 Due     September 20, 2005
    ------------------             -------------------------------