alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

(1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                               Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.


Date:   November 13, 2009
                                                             By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                                ---------------
                                                                     Jack Chen
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 13, 2009
                                                          By: /s/ Maggie Zhang
                                                              ----------------
                                                                  Maggie Zhang
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
IN RE: Maud Edwin Elliot INGRAM

No. 431P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 2018

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Ms. Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 14th of December 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Halifax County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of January 2018."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3,685
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,176
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,085
<PP&E>                                         203,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          48,180
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       169
<OTHER-SE>                                     (96,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,090
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62,927
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  50,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                   133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10



</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

K.K., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, WESTSIDE POST 

OFFICE, Montgomery, AL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0960

Issued: July 26, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On June 10, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a May 15, 2019 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0960.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the May 15, 2019 decision was November 11, 2019. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until June 10, 2021, more than 180 days after the May 15,

2019 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0960 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0960 is dismissed.

Issued: July 26, 2021

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
,

OFFICE OF **TNE** ATTORNEY **GENERAL** OF TEXAS AUSTIN

..

### BOA. Bayne Satkriiol4, Page S

Ia view or the abovo quoted tUM$e, 

### 8upm, a parrronto be rlltslblo 8otiva eezvl49 ~eoau8o~o~~p@yeloa~or portion8 ob Art1018 ror 

### rotframat 

### rrolp **m~ntal~diubilflr~**

**_ -**  muot mt aortain 

### prerorlaea raqulnnmm. HOmuastmM aative 

### rlr83m duly enrolled In an aotIv8 fir* doplrtuat IaIn~o;Ity 

### or town that oamor,rlthia thr 

### grovl8lon8'a~

Hi8 Uirebllltymaat bsve arioan in the ~OX%ZQan80 or ii8 **duty.** Xt I8 naoe88ary that he Slla with the 

### ~orrr(l or Tmateor 

### of hir olty 

### a oertitioak or hlr 4frabl.b 

### ltyIT& eligibll$ty ripe6 and awoxn to togothor with 

### a owtifio8t8 Of th@ oity 

### or tom phy8l&i, ii t&are bo on@, 

### or it AOM, than by a phy8iolan eeleotti by tha Boar4 of 

### Tzuatoe8. maah oortifioate to 

### bar&nod and 

### tr*~orn

to by e&l pbyrioIan ehorS.n& the dieabUlty.of thr 

### l ppltoant. WIbh th+m pps.wqOl8lte8 ia a&t+ we tarn aad 105k 

### to thp,euba3ttd l p- plloatioa, a aopy or rhioh, oaittims ~raonaU$iaa, ie attimah& hore%o.



### the p0xr0anoe or htr duty.Ron. Bayaa Sattoriiel4, 

### Page 4



### a alt 88 aOtiOe that th0 OWt~iut@ Or th.0 phJr~&OlM 16 phyafaiannot of 

### the Qlty or tm in r&ioh the app21- Oalkt I 8 0 tiMA. AS wo lstorpxo6 wetion 0, hWBtC@OM quota& t& 

### ~wtdfloate or the appllaant

### mm% bo 

### aeewai08 by a 

### oortirliaate or the olty or town p~8lOlaa (d the Olt$ 

### or tom 

### la whiah 

### the 

### poraoa &a a tireman, 

### on4 ii than b8 AOM 

### th8n by 

### any phy8iOiaA 

### seleotedby 

### Oha Board of ~ker. xi the olty when the ap lloant la rinvn has a 

### sit the 

### l ooomgnying

lfildav 

### 4 t mt18t 

### ,bm

mad@ brhlti batL Oiti, h. A0 6ity @i781OiU3 thrm nay &Otto? Bi&Std 

### b Board my mar* the &fLdavit, 

### Bornor, ruoh 

### fact mhoul E the pear on one 0f the o*rtlrfaato8

### rim. apvery tmly roam ATTO%lsm OmIRRAL or ‘Enn8f._, ,, ‘.~.~~, ,,. ~,,, ,. ;..:,_~~~ .,:, .,.:,;.... . ...!.,. ,.,

- izfasg,‘L
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.L., Appellant

and

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 

REGION II, Edison, NJ, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0746

Issued: November 9, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On February 7, 2020 appellant, sought an appeal from a purported September 20, 2019

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 20-0746.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 

The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP 

issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal. The September 20, 2019 

decision vacated a March 7, 2019 preliminary overpayment determination, therefore, it was not 

adverse to appellant. As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board 

may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 20-0746 

must be dismissed. Accordingly,
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 20-0746 is dismissed.

Issued: November 9, 2020

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBERT LEE WINCHESTER

No. 7026SC625

(Filed 18 November 1970)

On *certiorari*to review judgment of *Falls, J.,*entered at the 12 May 1969 Schedule “B” Criminal Session, Mecklenburg Superior Court.

Defendant was tried on a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging him with felonious larceny of a 1968 Pontiac automobile valued at $2,100. He pled not guilty, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged, and from judgment imposing prison sentence of not less than seven nor more than ten years, he gave notice of appeal. We allowed *certiorari*on 3 September 1970.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Russell G. Walker, Jr., for the State.*

*James M. Shannonhouse, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

In his brief defendant’s court appointed counsel states that he has conscientiously examined the record in his case but is unable to find error; he asks that this court carefully review the record and grant the defendant any relief that is appropriate.

We have given the record a thorough review but detect no prejudicial error; we conclude that the defendant received a fair trial and the sentence imposed is within the limits provided by statute.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Vaughn concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




The
      Board
      of Directors




Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc.




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      and
      Form SB-2 (No. 333-136143) of Crystal International Travel Group, Inc.
      of our report dated November 10, 2006, with respect to the balance sheets of
      Crystal International Travel Group, Inc. as of July 31, 2007 and 2005, and
      the
      related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income
      (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the
      July 31, 2007, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Crystal International Travel
      Group, Inc.





/s/
                Scharf Pera & Co., PLLC
              Scharf
                Pera & Co., PLLC




Charlotte,
      North Carolina


November
      16, 2007.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1) Theaccompanying  quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended January 31, 2009, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934,  and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 17, 2009 | /s/ Robert J. Ferguson                                     |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Robert J. Ferguson,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |                                                       |
|                      |                                                       |
| Date: March 17, 2009 | /s/ Brett L. Frevert                                       |
|                      | Brett L. Frevert, Interim  Chief Financial Officer         |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

s0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140882 

ROBERT VANDYKE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140882 

 COA: 286775 

 Leelanau CC: 07-007700-CD 

LEELANAU COUNTY AND DAVID GILL, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned executive officer of the registrant hereby certifies that this Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.




/s/ Steven R. LewisSteven
      R. LewisPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




Date:
September 14, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.25

                    ACCESS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                        1995 Stock Option Plan

Amendment

Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to authority
reserved in Section 21 of the 1995 Stock Option Plan of the Company, as
amended (the "1995 Plan"), hereby amends the 1995 Plan as follows:

Effective as of May 21, 2001, Section 10.1 of the 1995 Plan is deleted in
its entirety and is replaced with the following:

10.1.   Automatic Grants.  On the date of each Annual Meeting of the
Stockholders of Company, each Non-Employee Director (as defined
below) serving as such on such date shall receive a Nonstatutory Option
for the purchase of 10,000 shares of Stock.  On the date that a Non-
Employee Director is initially elected or appointed by the Board of
Directors such Non-Employee Director shall receive a Nonstatutory
Option to purchase 20,000 shares of Stock.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has adopted this Amendment as
of the 21st day of May, 2001.


ACCESS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:  /s/ Kerry P. Gray
     -----------------
     Kerry P. Gray
     President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5182 

To help certain communities adversely affected by FEMA’s flood mapping 

modernization program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To help certain communities adversely affected by FEMA’s 

flood mapping modernization program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION AND FLOOD PRO4 TECTION SYSTEMS. 

5 (a) SUSPENSION OF MAPPING UPDATES.—Notwith6 standing subsections (e) and (f) of section 1360 of the 

7 National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101(e) 

8 and (f)), the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

9 Management Agency shall not revise, update, or publish 

10 any flood insurance rate map under its Flood Map ModVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:59 Apr 30, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5182.IH H5182

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5182 IH

1 ernization Program (commonly referred to as ‘‘Map 

2 Mod’’) for any counties that are protected by a structure 

3 built or maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers un4 less the affected owner of such structure or the community 

5 protected by such structure— 

6 (1) has been formally notified of any defi7 ciencies in such structure; and 

8 (2) has been afforded 7 years to rectify any 

9 such deficiencies that would affect the flood insur10 ance rate map for the geographic area in which such 

11 structure or community is located. 

12 (b) LIMITATION ON REQUIRED PURCHASE; SUSPEN13 SION OF PREMIUM INCREASES.—Until such time as the 

14 owner of a structure described in subsection (a) has been 

15 afforded 7 years to rectify any identified deficiencies in 

16 the structure, and notwithstanding the mandatory pur17 chase requirements of sections 102 and 202 of the Flood 

18 Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4106), 

19 the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 

20 Agency shall not— 

21 (1) require owners of property located in any 

22 county described in subsection (a) who, prior to the 

23 date of enactment of this Act were not required to 

24 purchase flood insurance, to purchase flood insur25 ance; and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5182 IH

1 (2) for owners of property located in any county 

2 described in subsection (a) that had purchased flood 

3 insurance prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 

4 increase the risk premium rate charged for such 

5 flood insurance. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Stanley Lucius Atnipp, * From the 441st District Court

 of Midland County, Texas

 Trial Court No. CR40673.

Vs. No. 11-14-00287-CR * April 20, 2017

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


Exhibit 10.2




ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Assignment") is entered into effective as of May 21, 2013 by and between TVGoods, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Assignor") and As Seen On TV, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Assignee").

(A)

Assignor is a party to that certain License Agreement dated as of February 8, 2012 between Assignor and Kevin Harrington (the “License”).

(B)

Assignor desires to assign the License to Assignee.

 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1

Assignor hereby does transfer and assign to Assignee all of Assignor's rights, obligations, interests and liabilities under the License.

2

For and in consideration of the assignment hereunder, Assignee hereby assumes all of Assignor's rights, obligations, interests and liabilities under the License to the same extent as though it had originally been named as a party thereto and agrees to observe, perform and fulfill all the terms and conditions of the License and to the same extent as if it had been originally named as a party thereto.

3

This Assignment shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, Assignor and Assignee, and their respective successors and assigns.

4

This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without giving effect to conflicts of law principles.

		
	TVGOODS, INC.

	AS SEEN ON TV, INC.


	


By  /s/ Dennis W. Healey

	


By  /s/ Ronald C. Pruett, Jr.


	Name: Dennis W. Healey

Title: Chief Financial Officer

	Name: Ronald C. Pruett, Jr.

Title: Chief Executive Officer




 






- 1 -
191.30554
CALMEC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              California Electronics Corporation
                                                        Jon N. Leonard, Chairman


                             RIGHTS  AGREEMENT

This  agreement  ("Rights  Agreement")  is  entered  into as of June 1, 2000, by
California  Molecular Electronics Corp. ("CALMEC" or the "Company"), in favor of
its  President  and  CEO,  James  J.  Marek,  Jr.

WHEREAS  under  a  certain agreement of employment ("Employment Agreement"), Mr.
Marek  has  agreed  to work for CALMEC without full compensation until such date
(the  "Full  Comp Date") as the board of directors of CALMEC determines that the
Company  is  able to begin the payment of full compensation to Mr. Marek for his
services and is also able to perform under Item 2 of this agreement (see below);
and

WHEREAS  CALMEC  has  granted  a  Rolling Option to Mr. Marek under an incentive
stock  option  granted as of May 1, 2000 ("Rolling Option") that entitles him to
purchase  any  portion  of  N  shares  of Company stock, where the number N is a
variable  that  will  grow  as  time  passes until the Full Comp Date and may be
reduced  as,  and  if,  the Rolling Option is exercised from time to time by Mr.
Marek.

NOW  THEREFORE,  CALMEC  agrees  as  follows:

At  any  time  after the Full Comp Date, Mr. Marek shall have the one time right
under  this  Rights  Agreement  to  terminate the Rolling Option and require the
Company  to:

     1.   Issue him M shares of common stock, and/or
     2.   Pay him cash value at $6.00 per share for S shares, where the sum of M
          and  S  is equal to the number of unexercised shares under the Rolling
          Option  at  the  time  of  termination.

IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, CALMEC has executed this Rights Agreement as of the day and
year  first  above  written.

CALMEC:

BY:  /s/  Jon  N.  Leonard
   --------------------------------
     Jon  N.  Leonard,  Chairman


Confirmation:

/s/  James  J.  Marek,  Jr
---------------------------------
James  J.  Marek,  Jr.


<PAGE>