alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
61260 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–21115 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Defense Science Board 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee 

meeting date change. 

SUMMARY: On Monday, August 22, 2005 

(70 FR 48937) the Department of 

Defense announced open meetings of 

the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task 

Force on Manufacturing Technology. 

The November 2005 meeting dates have 

been revised from November 2–3, 2005 

to November 2, 2005 only. The task 

force will meet in closed session. The 

meeting will be held at Strategic 

Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 600, Arlington, VA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC 

Scoot Dolgoff, USA, Defense Science 

Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 

3C553, Washington, DC 20301–3140, via 

e-mail at scott.dolgoff@osd.mil, or via 

phone at (703) 571–0087. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 05–21111 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Missile Defense Agency; Membership 

of the Missile Defense Agency Senior 

Executive Service Performance Review 

Board 

AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency, DoD. 


EN21OC05.002</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Application Concerning Non-Contact Respiration 
Monitor

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is 
made of the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent Application No. 
10/936,992 entitled ``Non-Contact Respiration Monitor,'' filed 
September 9, 2004. Foreign rights are also available (PCT/US02/29563). 
The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the 
Army, has rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This invention relates to non-contact 
monitoring devices, and more particularly, non-contact respiration 
monitoring devices. According to the invention there is provided a 
monitoring device having a body defining an air monitoring channel 
between an air inlet and an air outlet. Disposed in monitoring channel 
is a respiration detection means, such as a flap-valve, which operates 
with associated logic circuitry to report the presence or absence of 
respiration via visual and audible displays. The device may be 
configured to attached, or be integrally connected to, the air input 
orifice of an air filter canister of a gas mask or the like. 
Alternatively, the device may be associated with the air output 
orifices or valves of a gas mask or the like.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21067 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following inventions are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are made 
available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.
    U.S. Patent Number 6,625,896 entitled ``Electrolytic Tilt Sensor 
and Method for Manufacturing Same'', Navy Case Number 82938. U.S. 
Patent Number 6,802,132 entitled ``Electrolytic Tilt Sensor and Method 
for Manufacturing Same'', Navy Case Number 84300.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego, Office of 
Research and Technology Applications, Code 2112, 83570 Silvergate Ave., 
RM 2302, San Diego, CA 92152-5048.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Stephen H. Lieberman, Office of 
Research and Technology Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems 
Center, San Diego, Code 2112, 83570 Silvergate Ave., RM 2302, San 
Diego, CA 92152-5048, telephone 619-553-2778, E-Mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8dbdccdd8c0cdc686c4c1cdcacddac5c9c6e8c6c9ded186c5c1c4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f5c5b4a5f474a410143464a4d4a5d424e416f414e595601424643">[email protected]</span></a>

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.)

    Dated: October 12, 2005.
S.K. Melancon,
Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21039 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                        |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION






The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and as
the Chief Financial Officer of CompuCredit Corporation, respectively, certify
that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of CompuCredit Corporation at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for
any other purpose.






This 25th
day of February 2009.








/s/
      DAVID G. HANNADavid
      G. HannaChief
      Executive Officer and
                          Chairman
      of the Board/s/
      J. PAUL WHITEHEAD, IIIJ.
      Paul Whitehead, IIIChief
      Financial
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CompuCredit Corporation and will be
retained by CompuCredit Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### J.D. IRONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-4728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Howardene Garrett, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

J.D. Irons appeals the three-year minimum mandatory sentence imposed for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We reverse and remand for correction of the sentence.

For possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, section 790.23, Florida Statutes (1999), the trial court sentenced Irons to three years in state prison as a habitual felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1999). The trial court also imposed a three-year minimum mandatory sentence enhancement pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)(l)(r). Irons contends that the three-year minimum mandatory provision of the sentence was illegal because he was in constructive, not actual, possession of the firearm. The information filed by the State did not specifically charge Irons with being in actual possession of a firearm. Moreover, no proof was presented to the trial court that Irons was in actual possession of .a firearm. There*799fore, imposition of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence was error. *See Bundrage v. State,*814 So.2d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that although the underlying offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon may be proved by either actual or constructive possession, the minimum mandatory sentence of section 775.087(2)(a)(l)(r) may be imposed only upon a finding of actual possession). With commendable candor, the State concedes error on this point.

The State also suggests that under the circumstances of this particular case, Irons should be granted the relief he requests, which is remand with instructions for the trial court to strike the three-year minimum mandatory sentence under section 775.087(2)(a)(l)(r), leaving the remainder of the sentence undisturbed. We agree. Irons does not need to be present for this correction of sentence. *See Windisch v. State,*709 So.2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Conviction affirmed; minimum mandatory sentence reversed, remanded to strike minimum mandatory sentence.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and FULMER and WALLACE, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 10.15
  th th
 Attention:
    
    Mr. Raymond SullivanRe:
    
    Fourth Amended Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October
11, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 10, 2006, as
further amended, modified and supplemented from time to time (the
Repurchase Agreement), among IXIS Real Estate Capital Inc.
(Buyer), New Century Mortgage Corporation (NCMC), NC Asset
Holding, L.P. (f/k/a NC Residual II Corporation, NCAH), NC Capital
Corporation (NCCC), New Century Credit Corporation (New
Century) and Home123 Corporation (Home123 and together with
NCMC, NCAH, NCCC and New Century, the Seller)
    1.
    
    Pursuant to Section 3(m) of the Repurchase Agreement, Buyer hereby extends the Termination
Date until the close of business on October 31, 2006 (the period from and including October
10, 2006, to and including October 31, 2006, the Extension Period).2.
    
    Except as described herein, all of the terms of the Repurchase Agreement are hereby ratified
and confirmed in all respects.3.
    
    All capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the respective meanings
ascribed to them in the Repurchase Agreement.4.
    
    In the event that any provision of this agreement conflicts with any provision of the
Repurchase Agreement or the Custodial and Disbursement Agreement, the terms of this agreement
shall control.




---



##### 



5.
    
    This agreement shall not be assigned by the Seller without the prior written consent of the
Buyer, which consent shall be in Buyers sole discretion.6.
    
    This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute
an original agreement, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument,
and either party hereto may execute this agreement by signing any such counterpart.7.
    
    This agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
New York without regard to conflicts of laws principles.
  -2-




---



##### 



Very truly yours,NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, as SellerBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    Executive Vice PresidentNC ASSET HOLDING, L.P., as SellerBy: NC DELTEX, LLC, its General PartnerBy: NC CAPITAL CORPORATION, its Sole MemberBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    PresidentNC CAPITAL CORPORATION, as SellerBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    President




---



##### 



NEW CENTURY CREDIT CORPORATION, as SellerBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    PresidentHOME123 CORPORATION, as SellerBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President
   By:
    
    /s/ Anthony MalangaName:
    
    Anthony MalangaTitle:
    
    Managing DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ Christopher HaydenName:
    
    Christopher HaydenTitle:
    
    Managing Director
#### In re John V. BAUS, Jr.

No. 2003-OB-1207.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 25, 2003.

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Transfer to Active Status filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that John V. Baus, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 14070, be reinstated to the practice of law, subject to the condition that he must fully and completely adhere to all terms of the five-year recovery agreement he entered into with the Lawyers Assistance Program on December 4, 2002. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall monitor respondent’s compliance with his recovery agreement and notify this court of any violation, which may be grounds for immediately returning respondent to disability inactive status.

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59320-59321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20392]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Membership of the Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Defense Finance and Accounting Service, DOD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Defense Finance and Accounting 
Service. The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 
4314(C)(4).
    The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior Executive 
Service

[[Page 59321]]

performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance 
ratings and performance bonuses to the Director, DFAS.

DATES: Effective date: November 9, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Hovey, DFAS SES Program Manager, 
Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington, Virginia, (863) 815-
3709.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(C)(4), the 
following executives are appointed to the Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service PRB: Brigadier General Jan Eakle, Patrick T. Shine, 
Leon J. Krushinski, Jerry S. Hinton, Kathleen D. Noe.
    Executives listed will service a one-year renewable term, effective 
November 9, 2005.

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-20392 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1"> The People of the State of New York,	Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Harold Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerianne Abriano, J.), rendered July 5, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Gerianne Abriano, J.), rendered July 5, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 220.03), and set forth sufficient factual allegations to show the basis for the arresting officer's conclusion that the substance at issue was a controlled substance. The instrument recited that police "took one pipe containing crack/cocaine from the ground where [the officer] observed the defendant drop the pipe" and that the officer believed the substance to be crack/cocaine based upon his "professional training as a police officer in the identification of drugs, [his] prior experience as a police officer making drug arrests, and [his] observation of the packaging, which is characteristic of crack/cocaine" (<i>see People v Smalls</i>, 26 NY3d 1064 [2015]<i>; People v Kalin</i>, 12 NY3d 225, 231-232 [2009]; <a href="../2010/2010_07996.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Pearson</i>, 78 AD3d 445</a> [2010], <i>lv denied </i>16 NY3d 799 [2011]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: March 14, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ARCHIE LEE HENDERSON

No. 6926SC192

(Filed 30 April 1969)

Appeal from *Falls, J., 2*December 1968, Schedule “A” Session, MecKlenbuRG County Superior Court.

Archie Lee Henderson (defendant) was charged in a proper bill of indictment with the felony of breaking and entering a warehouse building with the intent to steal merchandise therefrom. The building was occupied by Cargo Salvage Company, a sole proprietorship owned and operated by Amvan Hasson.

The defendant was represented by court-appointed counsel at his trial. The defendant personally and through his attorney entered a plea of guilty to the above charge. The trial judge then questioned the defendant at length in open court about this plea. He thereafter entered an order to the effect that the defendant freely, voluntarily, and understandingly entered a plea of guilty to the charge and that, *520at the time, the defendant knew and understood the penalty which the court could impose upon such plea.

From the imposition of a sentence of not less than seven years nor more than ten years in the State prison, the defendant appealed to this Court. The trial judge authorized the defendant to take this appeal as an indigent and assigned counsel to prepare the case on appeal and to present the case to this Court.

Attorney¡ *General Robert Morgan and Staff Attorney Carlos W. Murray, Jr., for the State.*

*W. Herbert Brown, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Campbell, J.

Counsel for defendant in his brief stated:

“After diligent study of the record in this case, this attorney can find no assignment of error anywhere in the proceedings of said case but submits the entire Record and this Brief to the Court for its determination as to whether or not any error heretofore has been committed to the prejudice of the defendant.”

We have reviewed the record in this case and can find no error in the proceedings in the trial court.

Since the defendant had a fair and impartial trial and since no error was called to the attention of this Court or appeared on the face of the record, the judgment of the superior court is

Affirmed.

BROCK and Morris, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                         FIRST MERCHANTS CAPITAL TRUST I

     This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of December 12, 2001 for the
purposes of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C. Sections 3801 et seq. (the "Act").

     The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1.   Name. The name of the business trust is "First Merchants Capital Trust I"
     (the "Trust").

2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Delaware trustee of
     the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as
     follows:

     First Union Trust Company, National Association
     One Rodney Square
     920 King Street
     Suite 102
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Attention: Corporate Trust Trustee Administration

3.   Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately upon
     filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being all of the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first above
written.

FIRST UNION TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
AS DELAWARE TRUSTEE

By:   /s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
   -----------------------------------------
   Name:  Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
         -----------------------------------
   Title: Vice President
          ----------------------------------

                                       -1-
<Page>

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE

 /s/ Michael L. Cox
-----------------------------------------
 Michael L. Cox

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE

 /s/ Larry R. Helms
-----------------------------------------
 Larry R. Helms, Esq.

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE

 /s/ Mark K. Hardwick
-----------------------------------------
 Mark K. Hardwick

                                       -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4927 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4927

To amend subtitle IV of title 40, United States Code, regarding county 
                  additions to the Appalachian region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2010

Mr. Davis of Tennessee (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend subtitle IV of title 40, United States Code, regarding county 
                  additions to the Appalachian region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION.

    Section 14102(a)(1)(K) of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Giles,'' after ``Franklin,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Hickman,'' after ``Hawkins,'';
            (3) by inserting ``Lincoln,'' after ``Lewis,'';
            (4) by inserting ``Perry,'' after ``Overton,''; and
            (5) by inserting ``Wayne,'' after ``Washington,''.
                                 <all>
```