alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5064 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the tolling of the 

timing of review for appeals of final decisions of the Board of Veterans’ 

Appeals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2010 

Mr. ADLER of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. HALL of New York, and Mr. ACKERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

tolling of the timing of review for appeals of final decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Access to Vet5 erans Benefits Act of 2010’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5064 IH

1 SEC. 2. TOLLING OF TIMING OF REVIEW FOR APPEALS OF 

2 FINAL DECISIONS OF BOARD OF VETERANS’ 

3 APPEALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7266(a) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In order’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 Except as provided in paragraph (2), in order’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2)(A) The 120-day period described in paragraph 

11 (1) shall be extended upon a showing of good cause for 

12 such time as justice may require. 

13 ‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph, it shall be con14 sidered good cause if a person was unable to file a notice 

15 of appeal within the 120-day period because of the per16 son’s service-connected disability.’’. 

17 (b) APPLICABILITY.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 

19 7266(a) of such title, as added by subsection (a), 

20 shall apply to a notice of appeal filed with respect 

21 to a final decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals 

22 that was issued on or after July 24, 2008. 

23 (2) REINSTATEMENT.—Any petition for review 

24 filed with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

25 that was dismissed by such Court on or after July 

26 24, 2008, as untimely, shall, upon the filing of a peVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:38 Apr 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5064.IH H5064

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5064 IH

1 tition by an adversely affected person filed not later 

2 than six months after the date of the enactment of 

3 this Act, be reinstated upon a showing that the peti4 tioner had good cause for filing the petition on the 

5 date it was filed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Date:
    
    November 8, 2005/s/ C. DEAN METROPOULOS

C. Dean MetropoulosChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         |                                                    
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                         | /s/Roger P. Deschenes                              
|                         | Roger P. Deschenes                                 
|                         | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: September 28, 2012 |                                                    





This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4912 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4912

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the required 
reduction in the amount of combat-related special compensation paid to 
   disabled combat-related uniformed services retirees retired under 
chapter 61 of such title whose disability is attributable to an injury 
          for which the members were awarded the Purple Heart.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2010

  Mrs. Halvorson (for herself, Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas, Mr. Brady of 
 Pennsylvania, and Ms. Giffords) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the required 
reduction in the amount of combat-related special compensation paid to 
   disabled combat-related uniformed services retirees retired under 
chapter 61 of such title whose disability is attributable to an injury 
          for which the members were awarded the Purple Heart.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION SPECIAL 
              RULE FOR DISABLED COMBAT-RELATED UNIFORMED SERVICES 
              RETIREES WHO ARE PURPLE HEART RECIPIENTS.

    (a) Exception.--Section 1413a(b)(3) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Exception for purple heart recipients.--The 
                reductions otherwise required by this paragraph in the 
                amount of the monthly payment under paragraph (1) for 
                an eligible combat-related disabled uniformed services 
                retiree who is retired under chapter 61 of this title 
                shall not apply if the combat-related disability of the 
                member is attributable to an injury for which the 
                member was awarded the Purple Heart.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to payments under section 1413a of title 10, United 
States Code, made for months beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5099 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 452
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5099

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 29, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, as the ``Michael C. 
                        Rothberg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICHAEL C. ROTHBERG POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Michael C. Rothberg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Michael C. Rothberg Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 452

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5099

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, as the ``Michael C. 
                        Rothberg Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 29, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5051 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KING

of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. 

MEEKS of New York, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mr. WEINER, Ms. 

CLARKE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. MCMAHON, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. RANGEL, 

Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. 

MURPHY of New York, Mr. TONKO, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. 

ARCURI, Mr. MAFFEI, Mr. LEE of New York, Mr. HIGGINS, and Ms. 

SLAUGHTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, 

as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5051 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary 

2 Smith Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 

5 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

6 to be a reference to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4233 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously 

to Lance Corporal Jordan C. Haerter and Corporal Jonathan Yale of 

the Marine Corps for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom 

in April 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself, Mr. HURT, and Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

posthumously to Lance Corporal Jordan C. Haerter and 

Corporal Jonathan Yale of the Marine Corps for acts 

of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom in April 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4233 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

2 OF HONOR TO LANCE CORPORAL JORDAN C. 

3 HAERTER AND CORPORAL JONATHAN YALE 

4 FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING OPERATION 

5 IRAQI FREEDOM. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith7 standing the time limitations specified in sections 6248 

8 and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, or any other 

9 time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 

10 medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the 

11 President may award the Medal of Honor posthumously 

12 under section 6241 of such title to Lance Corporal Jordan 

13 C. Haerter and Corporal Jonathan Yale of the Marine 

14 Corps for the acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Free15 dom described in subsection (b) for which they were origi16 nally awarded the Navy Cross. 

17 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

18 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Lance Cor19 poral Jordan C. Haerter and Corporal Jonathan Yale on 

20 April 22, 2008, while serving as Riflemen, 3d Platoon, 

21 Weapons Company, First Battalion, Ninth Marines, Regi22 mental Combat Team 1, I Marine Expeditionary Force 

23 (Forward) in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, in de24 fending a checkpoint in Ramadi, Iraq, from a suicide 

25 bomber driving a truck carrying a large quantity of exploVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:42 Mar 20, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4233.IH H4233

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4233 IH

1 sives and, at the cost of their own lives, saving the lives 

2 of more than 50 Marines and Iraqi policemen. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AFFIRM; and Opinion File December 17, 2013.

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 1 3

- 00 244

- CR

REGINALD FITZGERALD BROWN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal Distri ct Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 0 6

- 85756

- L



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Fillmore

Opinion b y Justice FitzGerald

Reginald Fitzgerald Brown appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for sexual assault of

a child . The tria l court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment

. On appeal, appellant’s

attorney filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief

presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable

grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]

1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to

file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.- 2

- We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief

. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in An ders cases)

. We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/

KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE

Do N ot Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

130244F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

REGINALD FITZGERALD BROWN

, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00244

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No . 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F06

- 85756

- L).

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald,

Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered December 17, 20 13.

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/

KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of RTI International Metals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence W. Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

March 8, 2004

/s/ LAWRENCE W. JACOBS
------------------------------------------------
Lawrence W. Jacobs
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the first amendment of the Annual Report of Accredo Health,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel R. Kimbrough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

/s/ Joel R. Kimbrough

Joel R. Kimbrough

Chief Financial Officer

June 28, 2005

Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### J. E. Loyless, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Hodges Brothers, defendants in error.

(By two judges.) When a garnishee had answered that he was not indebted to and had no effects of the defendant, and there was a traverse of his answer, and the plaintiff proved that the defendant had left with the garnishee a large box, for safe keeping only, the garnishee declining to be responsible for it, but permitting him to leave it in his store-house; that it was there at the time of the service of the garnishment, had been removed since, with the permission of the garnishee, by the defendant, and that it contained $200 00 worth of goods:

*Held,*That a verdict for the plaintiff, for the value of the goods, was sustained by the evidence. 27th February, 1872.

Bailment. Garnishment. Before Judge Harrell. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

Hodges Brothers had a claim against one Mann, and garnisheed Loyless. He answered that he neither owed Mann anything, nor had any property or effects of his in his hands when he was garnisheed. This answer was traversed. On the trial, Loyless swore that he had a store, which he con*648trolled exclusively, and that, by his permission, Mann left iu it a box nailed up, the contents of which he did not know j that when Mann put them there, he told Mann that he would not be responsible for them in any way. They were there when he was garnisheed, and he allowed Mann to' take them away. It was shown that the box contained goods worth $200 00, and that Hodges Brothers’ judgment against Mann was for more than $200 00. The Court charged the jury that, if said goods were in the store which Loyless controlled when he was garnisheed, and he permitted Mann to take them away, Loyless was liable to plaintiff for their value. The jury found accordingly. A new trial was moved for, upon the ground that said charge was wrong. Its refusal is assigned as error.

P. M. Harper *;*Clare *&*Goss, for plaintiff in error.

L. C. Hoyle ; C. B. Wooten, for defendant,

McCay, Judge.

Our law, Code, section 3226, requires the garnishee to answer what he is indebted to the defendant, or what effects of his he has in hand, or had at the service of the summons. Was not this box and its contents *m store*with the garnishee. True, he held it without risk, but it was none the *less*in his charge. He would have been liable for gross neglect, had any damage come to it. There are, it is true, some cases where sealed and unbroken packages, left as this was, have been held not to make the holder subject to garnishment. But it will be found that they turn mainly on the special law of the State, or on the fact that it did not appear that the package had any actual *value.*Here the clerk of the garnishee testifies, that the box contained goods, and that they were worth $200 00.

We see nothing to justify us in saying that there were not “effects” of the defendant in the hands of the garnishee. *649They were in his custody — in his possession, as the will of the owner, and the verdict of the jury was right. The goods were turned over to the defendant by the garnishee, at his own risk, after the service of the summons.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Financial Telecom Limited (USA), Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:


(1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-QSB/A Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            Financial Telecom Limited (US), Inc.



Date: January 13, 2006                                        By: /s/ David Chen
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                      David Chen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


Date: January 13, 2006                                   By: /s/ Ronald Gorthuis
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                 Ronald Gorthuis
                                                         Chief Financial Officer