alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                 Paul A. Brooke
                            21 E. 90th Street, #14AB
                            New York, New York 10128

March 31, 2002

Jean-Pierre Sommadossi, Ph.D.
Novirio Pharmaceuticals Limited
c/o Novirio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
125 CambridgePark Drive
Cambridge, MA 02140

Dear Jean-Pierre:

This letter is inform you that I resign effective immediately as a director of
Novirio Pharmaceuticals Limited and, as we have agreed, will terminate my
service as a consultant to the Company. Please acknowledge your receipt of this
letter and your agreement and acknowledgement that the 60,000 Ordinary Shares
which are the subject of the Stock Restriction Agreement dated as of December
15, 2000 by and between Novirio and me will become vested in full as of the
effective date of this termination of service.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Paul A. Brooke

Paul A. Brooke



Acknowledged and Agreed this 31st day of March 2002

NOVIRIO PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED


By: /s/ Jean-Pierre Sommadossi
   ------------------------------------
   Jean-Pierre Sommadossi, Ph.D.
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5248 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5248

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit the leasing 
    of any area of the outer Continental Shelf for the exploration, 
     development, or production of oil, gas, or any other mineral.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2010

  Mr. Pallone (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, and Mr. Garamendi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit the leasing 
    of any area of the outer Continental Shelf for the exploration, 
     development, or production of oil, gas, or any other mineral.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No New Drilling Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LEASING OF OCS FOR EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, OR 
              PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, OR ANY OTHER MINERAL.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (16 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended--
            (1) by striking so much as precedes subsection (g) and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 18. PROHIBITION ON LEASING OF OCS FOR EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, 
              OR PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, OR ANY OTHER MINERAL.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
lease may be issued for the exploration, development, or production of 
oil, gas, or any other mineral on the outer Continental Shelf .'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively; and
            (3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking the 
        first sentence.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

*License Number:*                     018391N.                

*Name:*                     LCL Cargo Services Inc.                

*Address:*                     8100 NW., 29th Street, Miami, FL 33122.                          ( print page 6007)    

*Order Published:*                     FR: 12/22/04 (Volume 69, No. 245, Pg. 76766).                

Sandra L. Kusumoto,

 Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. 05-2149 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              433,620
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3,407,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                        163,000
<INVENTORY>                                       4,078,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,883,921
<PP&E>                                            8,065,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7,173,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,607,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,227,961
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             92,710
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,362,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,607,905
<SALES>                                          25,366,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25,366,998
<CGS>                                            17,206,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8,489,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  474,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (802,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          4,916
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (807,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (807,882)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.09)



</TABLE>
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396






June 11, 2002



Campbell & Company, Inc.
Court Tower Building, Towson
210 West Pennsylvania Avenue
Suite 770
Baltimore, MD 212104


Attn: Mrs. Theresa D. Becks

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mrs. Becks:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2003 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Potomac Futures  Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund
o        Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Campbell F.M. and Energy Fund plc
o        AURORA 2001

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:    /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         -----------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director


AGREED AND ACCEPTED
CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.

By:   /s/ Mrs. Theresa D. Becks
        -----------------------------

Print Name:    Mrs. Theresa D. Becks
              -----------------------------
              Chief Financial Officer


DRMcA/sr
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7119

STEVEN FRANCIS PENDERGAST,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-522-PJM)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Francis Pendergast, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Pendergast v. Sizer, No. CA-97-522-PJM (D. Md. July 28, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

NetSilicon, Inc.
Waltham, Massachusetts

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (including a Reoffer Prospectus on Form S-3)(No.
333-32368) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-44818) and Form
S-3 (No. 333-47670) of our audit report dated February 23, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of NetSilicon, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2001.

                                          BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 1, 2001

                                       Ex-3
<PAGE>
                                       21

Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
File No. 333-43601 and this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of our report dated August
27, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
AFP Imaging Corporation and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

         Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of AFP Imaging
Corporation and Subsidiaries listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
September 20, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Dean Metropoulos, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006                  
|                                    
|/s/ C. DEAN METROPOULOS             
|C. Dean Metropoulos                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAY WISE BUTLER

No. 724SC610

(Filed 20 December 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *Rouse, Judge,*17 April 1972 Session, Onslow Superior Court.

By warrant proper in form defendant was charged with maintaining and operating *“a*structure (home)” for the purpose of prostitution and assignation, a violation of G.S. 14-204. From judgment imposed on a verdict of guilty in district court, defendant appealed to superior court where he was found guilty by a jury. From judgment in superior court imposing prison sentence of 18 to 24 months, defendant appealed.

*168
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan by Charles M. Hensey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Bailey & Robinson by Edward G. Bailey for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

Stating that he has carefully reviewed the record in this case but is unable to assign any error, defendant’s court appointed counsel asks us to make a careful review and determine if there is error. Following a careful review of the entire record on appeal, we conclude that defendant received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and the sentence imposed is within the limits allowed by statute.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal
financial officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael P. ODonnellMichael P. ODonnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




Dated: August 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5073 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5073

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and enact the OPTION Act 
                                of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2010

Mr. Broun of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Labor, Appropriations, the 
 Judiciary, Natural Resources, House Administration, and Rules, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and enact the OPTION Act 
                                of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND 
              THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) PPACA.--Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act, such Act is repealed, and the provisions of 
law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such 
Act had not been enacted.
    (b) Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.--
Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010, such Act is repealed, and the provisions of 
law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such 
Act had not been enacted.

SEC. 2. ENACTMENT OF THE OPTION ACT OF 2009.

    The bill H.R. 3889 (111th Congress), as introduced in the House of 
Representatives on October 21, 2009, is hereby enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Gold Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester S. Caesar, CPA, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Date:         March 28, 2006              /s/ Lester S. Caesar
                                           -------------------------
 Date Amended: August 4, 2006              Lester S. Caesar, CPA
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23





Consent of Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP




---




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on or about March 2, 2001 of First
Place Financial Corp. of our report dated July 24, 2002, except for Note 19, dated August 9, 2002 related to the consolidated balance sheets of First Place Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the three years ended June 30, 2002, which report is included in this Form 10-K.





CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP





Cleveland, Ohio


September 30, 2002
#### MICHAEL J. WHEELER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7531

February 26, 1975

531 P.2d 1358

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Theodore J. Manos,*Deputy, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Roy A. Woof-ter,*District Attorney, and *Dan M. Seaton,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Michael J. Wheeler, the appellant, was found guilty by jury verdict of robbery. NRS 200.380. The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

*120“On appeal, the issue is not whether this court would have found appellant guilty, but whether the jury properly could.” Anstedt v. State, 89 Nev. 163, 165, 509 P.2d 968 (1973). “The jury is the sole and exclusive judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given the evidence.” King v. State, 87 Nev. 537, 538, 490 P.2d 1054 (1971).

Appellant’s first contention is that the testimony of four eyewitnesses was so similar that there must have been a prearranged plan among them to so testify. The record supports no such allegation of collusion among the witnesses and the eyewitness testimony is otherwise compelling. Appellant next argues that his alibi evidence was sufficient to acquit him. The jury apparently chose not to accept such evidence as was its right.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdict of guilty. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5045 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the tolling of the 

timing of review for appeals of final decisions of the Board of Veterans’ 

Appeals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. ADLER of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

tolling of the timing of review for appeals of final decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Access to Vet5 erans Benefits Act of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5045 IH

1 SEC. 2. TOLLING OF TIMING OF REVIEW FOR APPEALS OF 

2 FINAL DECISIONS OF BOARD OF VETERANS’ 

3 APPEALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7266(a) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In order’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 Except as provided in paragraph (2), in order’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) The 120-day period described in paragraph (1) 

11 shall be extended upon a showing of good cause for such 

12 time as justice may require.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 

15 7266(a) of such title, as added by subsection (a), 

16 shall apply to a notice of appeal filed with respect 

17 to a final decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals 

18 that was issued on or after July 24, 2008. 

19 (2) REINSTATEMENT.—Any petition for review 

20 filed with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

21 that was dismissed by such Court on or after July 

22 24, 2008, as untimely, shall, upon the filing of a pe23 tition by an adversely affected person filed not later 

24 than six months after the date of the enactment of 

25 this Act, be reinstated upon a showing that the petiVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:39 Apr 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5045.IH H5045

tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5045 IH

1 tioner had good cause for filing the petition on the 

2 date it was filed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS