alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sandra S. Eck, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[717 NYS2d 789]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 18, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Prior to returning from a leave of absence, the employer granted claimant’s request to return to work in March 1999 on a part-time basis of two days a week for a total of 12.5 hours a week. In April 1999, claimant accommodated the employer’s request that she cover vacation and sick time of other employees. Thereafter, in November 1999, claimant notified the employer that she no longer wanted to provide vacation and sick coverage but that she wanted to return to the initial agreement of 12.5 hours a week. Claimant left her employment when the employer declined to grant her request.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment under disqualifying circumstances. Dissatisfaction with one’s work schedule or responsibilities has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see,*
      *691
      *Matter of Anthony [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 876, 877; *Matter of Papaleo [Commissioner of Labor],*250 AD2d 895, *lv denied*92 NY2d 807), especially where, as here, claimant waived any objection to covering vacation and sick leave since she accepted the situation for several months without complaint *(see, Matter of Bartczak [Commissioner of Labor],*272 AD2d 731, 732; *Matter of Stoddard [Sweeney],*242 AD2d 817).

Peters, J. P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SK Realty Corp., (the "Registrant")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


      (1)   The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32,
            fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant


Dated: August 22, 2006                         /s/ Richard Miller
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Richard Miller,
                                               Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                               Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dan O'Brien, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Flexible Solutions
International Inc.


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and


5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: March 29, 2004


/s/DAN O'BRIEN
--------------
Dan O'Brien


President and Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 11, 2014

NO. 03-14-00018-CV

Kristine M. Giliotti, Appellant

v.

Steven P. Giliotti, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the decree signed by the trial court on December 3, 2013. Appellant has 

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 20 - 00237 - CR BONNIE ALLEN THOMAS AKA BONNIE ALLEN - PIERONI, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE O n Appeal from the 18 th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F50926 , Honorable F.B. McGregor, Jr. , Presiding



### November 2 , 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS , JJ. Appellant, Bonnie Allen Thomas, filed a notice of appeal from the Tenth Court of Appeals’ mandate affirming her conviction. We dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction. In 2017, a ppellant was convicted of carrying a weapon in a prohibited place 1 and sentenced to five year s’ confinement, suspended in favor of community supervision. T he Tenth Court affirmed her conviction in Thomas v. State , No. 10 - 17 - 00138 - CR, 2019 Tex.

1 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 46.03 (a), (g) (West Supp. 2020 ) (third - degree felony offense).2

App. LEXIS 7856, at *20 (Tex. App.
— Waco Aug. 28, 2019, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) , and t he Court of Criminal Appeals refused her petition for discretionary review. On July 13, 2020, the Tenth Court issued its mandate affirming the trial c ourt’s judgment . Thereafter, a ppellant filed a notice of appeal stating “[t]he justices at the 10th Court of Appeals have not followed the constitution their decision rendered 7/13/20 is void.” Th at appeal was later transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 2013). We have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a judgment of conviction or where appellate jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Ab bott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694, 696 - 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Because a n appellate court’s mandate is n either a judgment of conviction nor a trial court order from which an appeal is specifically authorized , we lack jurisdiction over such an appeal . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 18.1 (requiring an appellate court clerk to issue a mandate in accordance with the appellate court’s judgment after the judgment becomes final ). Further more , to the extent appellant seeks to challenge her conviction by this appeal , we are also without jurisdiction. O nly the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post - conviction relief from a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly , we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Roger P. DeschenesRoger P. DeschenesVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: October 13, 2011










This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5148 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5148

  To amend title 39, United States Code, to clarify the instances in 
        which the term ``census'' may appear on mailable matter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2010

   Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mr. Chaffetz, and Mrs. Maloney) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 39, United States Code, to clarify the instances in 
        which the term ``census'' may appear on mailable matter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR MAIL BEARING THE TERM ``CENSUS'' ON THE 
              ENVELOPE OR OUTSIDE COVER OR WRAPPER.

    (a) Matter Soliciting the Purchase of a Product or Service.--
Section 3001(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``; or on which the term 
        `census' is visible through the envelope or outside cover or 
        wrapper'' after ``or which bears the term `census' on the 
        envelope or outside cover or wrapper''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or matter on which the 
        term `census' is visible through the envelope or outside cover 
        or wrapper'' after ``In the case of matter bearing the term 
        `census' on the envelope or outside cover or wrapper''.
    (b) Matter Soliciting Information or Contribution of Funds.--
Section 3001(i) of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``; or on which the term 
        `census' is visible through the envelope or outside cover or 
        wrapper'' after ``or which bears the term `census' on the 
        envelope or outside cover or wrapper''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or matter on which the 
        term `census' is visible through the envelope or outside cover 
        or wrapper'' after ``In the case of matter bearing the term 
        `census' on the envelope or outside cover or wrapper''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Each of the undersigned, Shaun E. McAlmont, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (the “Company”), and Cesar Ribeiro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”).




Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his respective knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 5, 2010/s/ Shaun E. McAlmontShaun E. McAlmont

President & Chief Executive Officer/s/ Cesar RibeiroCesar Ribeiro

Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND>
                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YEAR
ENDED  JUNE  30,  2000  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999   JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                   1,274,395       595,265
<SECURITIES>                             3,900,000     1,500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,540,573       111,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,640         5,990
<INVENTORY>                                      0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,715,695     2,200,599
<PP&E>                                     201,989       140,044
<DEPRECIATION>                             138,052       101,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,733,678     2,242,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      691,114       233,649
<BONDS>                                          0             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0             0
<PREFERRED>                                      0             0
<COMMON>                                 8,550,777     3,169,134
<OTHER-SE>                             (1,508,213)    (1,160,401)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,733,678     2,242,282
<SALES>                                          0             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,530        47,810
<CGS>                                      232,492       107,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,274,697       759,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,122,631             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,187         2,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,285,944)     (694,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,715           800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0             0
<CHANGES>                                        0             0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,287,659)     (695,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.53)        (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.53)        (.012)


</TABLE>
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 21994D1231(15)

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 44/94 of 15 December 1994 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement***Official Journal L 372 , 31/12/1994 P. 0020 - 0020*

DECISION OF  THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 44/94

of 15 December 1994

amending Annex II (Technical regulations,  standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT  COMMITTEE,

 Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting  the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as 'the Agreement`, and in  particular Article  98 thereof,

 Whereas Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No  7/94 of 21   March 1994 amending Protocol 47 and certain Annexes to the EEA Agreement ();

 Whereas Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6  June 1994 on the  approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating  to recreational craft () is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

 HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following new chapter shall be added to Annex  II to the  Agreement:

 'XXXL. RECREATIONAL CRAFT

ACTS REFERRED TO

1.394  L  0025: Directive 94/25/EC of the European  Parliament and of the Council of 6  June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and  administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (OJ No  L  164, 30.   6.  1994, p.  15).`

Article 2

The texts of Directive 94/25/EC in the Finnish, Icelandic,  Norwegian and Swedish languages, which are annexed to the respective language versions of this  Decision, are authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1  February 1995, provided that all the  notifications under Article  103  (1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to,  the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 1994.

 For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H. HAFSTEIN

() OJ No L 160, 28.  6.   1994, p. 1.

  () OJ No L 164, 30.  6.  1994, p. 15.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEWIS FRANKLIN FLANDERS

No. 6926SC18

(Filed 30 April 1969)

Criminal Law § 161— the appeal — exception to the judgment

An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper.

Appeal by defendant from *Falls, J.,*at the 2 September 1968 Schedule “A” Criminal Session of Mecklenburg Superior Court.

By indictment proper in form, defendant was charged with murder. When his case was called for trial, defendant, through his at*506torney, tendered, a plea of guilty to the offense of voluntary manslaughter, which plea was accepted by the State. He was sentenced to §tate Prison for a period of seventeen years from which he appeals.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan and Staff Attorney Carlos W. Murray, Jr., for the State.*

*Bailey & Davis by Nelson M. Casstevens, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Britt, J.

•' Defendant’s court-appointed counsel brings forward no assignment of error, frankly stating that he is unable to find error but asks the court to carefully review the record and grant such relief as may be proper.

An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. *State v. Ruffin,*3 N.C. App. 307, 164 S.E. 2d 503, citing 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152.

We have carefully reviewed the record before us' and find that the defendant was charged upon a valid bill of indictment, entered a plea of guilty to a lesser offense encompassed in said bill of indicN ment, and was given a sentence which was within statutory limits. *State v. Hopper,*271 N.C. 464, 156 S.E. 2d 857; *State v. Williams,*3 N.C. App. 233, 164 S.E. 2d 404.

Having found no error upon the face of the record, the judgment of the superior court is

Affirmed.

Mallard, C.J., and Parrer, J., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 2 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 2 , 2020

1 60 772 ( 5 2 )

SARON E. MARQUARDT, Personal

Representative of the ESTATE OF

SANDRA D. MARQUARDT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 160772

v COA: 343248

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 000621

- NH

VELLAIAH DURAI UMASHANKAR, M.D.,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _______________________________________/

On or der of the Chief Justice, the motion of the American Medical Association and

the Michigan State Medical Society to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus

brief will be accepted for fil ing if submitted on or before September 21 , 2020.