1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA , TEXAS

______________________

No . 06 -15-00006-CV

______________________ BILLIE MURPHY TREMBLE, SHARON TREMBLE DONALDSON, S ELIA TREMBLE SHAWKEY, WILMER FORREST TREMBLE, JR., THE ESTATE OF WILMER FORREST TREMBLE, SR., Appellants

V.

LUMINANT MINING COMPANY LLC, ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

, Appellees

On App eal from the 4 th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-392



### LUMINANT MINING COMPANY LLC'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEALS WITH LIFT STAY ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

A ppellee Luminant Mining Company LLC ("Luminant") moves to reinstate the

above- referenced appeal

, and two companion ones, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 8.3, and in compliance with this Court’s June 25, 2015 Order, and for such

motion shows the Court as follows: ACCEPTED 06-15-00006-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/20/2015 12:32:53 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK2 Luminant was the Plaintiff in these partition suits in the trial court, now on appeal

before this Court ("the Partition Suits"). 1 Appe llants Billie Murphy Tremble, Sharon

Tremble Donaldson, S elia Tremble Shawkey, and Wilmer Forrest Tremble, Jr. ("the

Tremble Family") were Defendants. Luminant filed the Partition Suits on November 26,

2013.

On April 29, 2014, Luminant and each of numer ous other related debtor entities

filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United Stat es Code

in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The bankruptcy

filing by Luminant and other debtors effected an automatic stay of certain litigation in

w h ich the debtors were parties. Luminant concluded that t he stay , however, did not apply

to the Partition Suits under Bankruptcy law , and Luminant therefore did not file a notice

of bankruptcy in the Partition S uits.

On December 12, 2014, the Tremble Family filed suit in the Rusk County District

Court against Luminant, Energy Future Holdings Corporation, and "Subsidiaries," in

Cause No. 2014

- 402 ("the Tremble Suit"). In the Tremble Suit, the Tremble Family

a lleges fraud and other claims and se eks the recovery of damages.

On January 8, 2015, Luminant and Energy Future Holdings Corporation filed a

Notice of Suggestion on Pendency of Bankruptcy ("Notice of Bankruptcy") in the

Tremble Suit.

1 In their notices of appeal, Appellants named Luminant and Energy Future Holdings Corporation and "Subsidiaries" as Appellees. Neither Energy Futur e Holdings Corporation nor any s ubsidiaries were Plaintiffs in the district court, and thus these entities are not proper Appellees. These party issues will be a ddressed in the Brief of Appellees, once the Court resolves the abatement of these appeals.3 On May 19, 2015, the Tr emble Family filed a copy of Luminant’s Notice of

Bankruptcy that Luminant had previously filed in the Tremble Suit with the Clerk of this

Court in the se three appeals in the Partition Suits.

On May 28, 2015, this Court issued an Ord er suspending the three appeals and

abating the cases. The Order states that "[a]ny party may move to reinstate the appeal by

promptly filing a motion to reinstate including, as an attachment, either a certified copy

of an order showing that the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted or any other

authenticated document demonstrating that reinstatement is permitted by federal law

and/or the relevant bankruptcy court."

Luminant previously filed motion s to reinstate these appeals, bu t discuss ed legal

auth orities about why it believes the stay does not apply to the Partition Suits and did not

obtain or include a lift stay order. On June 25, 2015, this Court overruled the previous

motions to reinstate these appeals because the motions did “not include (1) a certified

copy of an order showing that the automatic stay has been lifted or (2) an authenticated

document demonstrating that reinstatement is permitted by federal law and/or the

relevant bankruptcy court.”

In the bankruptcy proceeding, on July 21, 2015, Luminant and Energy Future

Holdings Corporation moved for an order confirming that the stay was not in effect or to

lift the stay as to this and the two related appeals. A true and correct copy of that motion

is submitted with this motion a s Exhibit A and incorporated in this motion by reference.4 On O ctober 15 , 2015, the bankruptcy court heard and granted the motion to lift

stay as to these appeals . A certified copy of the bankruptcy court’s l ift stay order i s

submitted with this motion as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference in this motion.

For these reasons, Appellee Luminant M ining Company LLC requests that the

Court reinstate these appeals.

Respectfully submitted,

Jackson, Sjoberg, McCarthy & Townsend, LLP

David E. Jackson State Bar No. 10458500 djackson@jacksonsjoberg.com

Marc O. Knisely State Bar No. 11614500 mknisely@jacksonsjoberg.com

7 11 W. 7 th Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 472

- 7600 (512) 225

- 5565 FAX

By: /s/ David E. Jackson David E. Jackson Stat e Bar No. 10458500

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES LUMINANT MINING COMPANY LLC5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVI CE

I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the above and foregoing Motion to Reinstate Appeals With Lift Stay Order was sent via the following method, to the following parties on this the 20th day of October

, 2015

.

Billie J. Murphy Tremble PO Box 541 Marshall, TX 75671

- 0541 Via regular mail and Certified Mail, RRR 7015 0640 0003 1869 5823

Sharon Tre mble Donaldson 2010 Wineberry Dr

. Katy, T X 77450 Via regular mail and Certified Mail, RRR 7015 0640 0003 1869 5847

Selia Tre mble Shawkey 712 South 37th Street San Diego, CA 92113 Via regular mail and Certified Mail, RRR 7015 0640 0003 1869 5854

Wilmer Forrest Tremble, Jr. 361 5 Sheldon Pearland, TX 77584 Via regular mail and Certified Mail, RRR 7015 0640 0003 1869 5861

/s/ David E. Jackson David E. Jackson