61156 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the response 

submitted by domestic producer Ames True 

Temper to be adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

The Steens Mountain Advisory 

Council meetings are open to the public. 

Information to be distributed to the 

Steens Mountain Advisory Council is 

requested prior to the start of each 

meeting. Public comment periods will 

be scheduled for 11 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 

local time, each day. The amount of 

time scheduled for public presentations 

and meeting times may be extended 

when the authorized representative 

considers it necessary to accommodate 

all persons. 

Under the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act management regulations 

(41 CFR 102–3.15(b)), in exceptional 

circumstances an agency may give less 

than 15 days notice of committee 

meeting notices published in the 

Federal Register. In this case, this 

notice is being published less than 15 

days prior to the meeting due to the 

urgent need to meet deadlines to 

complete the Steens Mountain 

Cooperative Management and Protection 

Area Travel Plan (due December 2005) 

and the North Steens Ecosystem 

Restoration Project Environmental 

Impact Statement and to avoid 

additional delays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Additional information concerning the 

Steens Mountain Advisory Council may 

be obtained from Rhonda Karges, 

Management Support Specialist, Bureau 

of Land Management Burns District 

Office, 28910 Hwy 20 West, Hines, 

Oregon 97738. Information can also be 

obtained by phone at (541) 573–4400 or 

e-mail Rhonda_Karges@blm.gov. 

Dated: October 13, 2005. 

Karla Bird, 

Designated Federal Official, Andrews 

Resource Area Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 05–20995 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–33–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–457–A–D 

(Second Review)] 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of expedited fiveyear reviews concerning the 

antidumping duty orders on heavy 

forged hand tools from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on heavy forged hand tools 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. For further information 

concerning the conduct of these reviews 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Olympia DeRosa Hand (202–205–3182), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On October 4, 2005, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (70 

FR 38101, July 1, 2005) of the subject 

five-year reviews was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report. A staff report containing 

information concerning the subject 

matter of the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on December 5, 

2005, and made available to persons on 

the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for these reviews. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, 

interested parties that are parties to the 

reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determinations 

the Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

December 8, 2005 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

reviews nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the reviews by 

December 8, 2005. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its reviews, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II (C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the reviews must be served 

on all other parties to the reviews (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination. The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the reviews period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s 

rules. 

Issued: October 17, 2005. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20975 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P