alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                           2,228                 183,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               2,160,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     92,178                 101,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,551               3,048,665
<PP&E>                                         399,262                 131,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,231                  30,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,616,068               3,553,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          660,761                   7,007
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       234,566                 173,916
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,843,522               1,567,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,616,068               3,553,362
<SALES>                                         82,192                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,920                 242,221
<CGS>                                          244,874                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,077,692               1,065,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,521                   1,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,239,646)               (823,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,239,646)               (823,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,239,646)               (823,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)                   (.06)



</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5035 

To authorize appropriations for the construction of vessels for the Navy 

and to authorize appropriations for loan guarantees for commercial vessels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the construction of vessels 

for the Navy and to authorize appropriations for loan 

guarantees for commercial vessels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Shipbuilding 

5 Budget Policy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING AUTHORIZATIONS OF AP7 PROPRIATIONS. 

8 (a) NAVY.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro9 priated for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2015 for the 

10 construction of vessels for the Navy to meet the force reVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:56 Apr 16, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5035.IH H5035

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5035 IH

1 quirements of the Navy (as described in the annual naval 

2 vessel construction plan required by section 231 of title 

3 10, United States Code) in the amount of 

4 $20,000,000,000. 

5 (b) THE MERCHANT MARINE.—Funds are hereby 

6 authorized to be appropriated for each of fiscal years 2011 

7 through 2015 for loan guarantees and commitments au8 thorized under chapter 537 of title 46, United States 

9 Code, for the construction of new vessels to replace and 

10 expand the domestic fleet of commercial vessels (as that 

11 term is defined in that chapter) in the amount of 

12 $60,000,000. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incoporation by reference in Registration No. 333-38971 of
Community Savings Bankshare, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report on the consolidated
financial statements of Community Savings Bankshares, Inc. as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1998, dated February 11, 1999 appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Community Savings Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



                                        Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 25, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF  ETS PAYPHONES, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, am the Chief Executive Officer of ETS Payphones, Inc. (the "Company").

This
certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

I
hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:



Dated:
August 5, 2004

| |  | /s/GUY A. LONGOBARDOGuy A. Longobardo
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ETS Payphones, Inc. and will be retained by ETS Payphones, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that: (1) the 10-Q Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
                                                Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.


Date:   August 14, 2008
                                                              By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                                  -------------
                                                                      Jack Chen
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date:   August 14, 2008
                                                             By: /s/ Klaus Shen
                                                                 --------------
                                                                     Klaus Shen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
CROWELL v. CROWELL

31A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Crowell, Andrea Kirby

Amy Simpson Fiorenza, Attorney at Law, for Crowell, William Worrell

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of February 2019 by Defendant to Deem Brief Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8086

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY LEE RAWLINGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00160-BO-1; 5:11-cv-00338-BO)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Lee Rawlings, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jane J. 

Jackson, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Lee Rawlings seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2012) motion and denying his motions to compel 

discovery. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rawlings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARUE SHERMAN — and — STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANK GAINEY

No. 724SC642

(Filed 20 December 1972)

Escape § 1— felonious escape — sufficiency of evidence

State’s evidence required submission of defendant’s case to the jury where it tended to show that defendants were serving sentences *154imposed upon convictions for felonies, that it was determined that defendants were missing from their prison unit and that defendants were apprehended the next day at a place other than within the confines of the prison unit.

Appeal by defendants from *Bouse, Judge,*24 April 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Sampson County.

Defendants were charged in separate bills of indictment with felonious escape.

The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 13 November 1971 defendant LaRue Sherman was serving a sentence imposed upon a conviction in Johnston County of the felony of armed robbery; on 13 November 1971 defendant Frank Gainey was serving a sentence imposed upon a conviction in Cumberland County of the felony of armed robbery; on 13 November 1971 both defendants were in custody in prison unit 4545 located near Clinton in Sampson County; at the time for the evening lockup at unit 4545 on 13 November 1971 it was determined that defendants were missing; in response to a call from the captain in charge of unit 4545, the highway patrol and Clinton police aided in a search for defendants; at about 4:00 a.m. on 14 November 1971, patrolman L. W. Harrington apprehended both defendants on Peterson Street in the town of Clinton and, with the aid of the Clinton police, returned the two defendants to unit 4545. Defendants offered no evidence.

From verdicts of guilty of felonious escape, and additional prison sentences imposed thereon, defendants appealed.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Mitchell, for the State.*

*Joseph B. Chambliss for the defendants.*

BROCK, Judge.

The State’s evidence required submission of these cases to the jury, and it supports the verdicts of guilty. We have examined the record proper in each case and no prejudicial error appears.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Britt concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 17, 2005, 1 p.m. to October 17, 2005, 2 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 30, 2005, 70 FR 57304-57305.                

The meeting will be held on October 13, 2005. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 6, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20740 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROOSEVELT MORNES

No. 7126SC138

(Filed 28 April 1971)

Burglary and Unlawful Breakings § 5; Larceny § 7 — sufficiency of evidence

In a prosecution charging defendant with the felonious breaking or entering of a hardware store and with the larceny of a lawn mower therefrom, the State’s evidence was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of not guilty.

Appeal by defendant from *Beal, Special Superior Cowrt Judge,*9 November 1970 Special Criminal Session, Mecklen-burg Superior Court.

Defendant was tried on a bill of indictment containing two counts: one of felonious breaking or entering and a second count charging felonious larceny pursuant to a felonious breaking or entering. From a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant, represented by his court-appointed attorney, appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney L. Philip Covington for the State.*

*W. Herbert Brown, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

The sole assignment of error is that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of not guilty. Evidence for the State tended to show the following. At 2:50 a.m. on 29 August 1970 the defendant was observed pushing an orange-red electric lawn mower down a sidewalk on South Mint Street in Charlotte, North Carolina, about two blocks from the building in which the Little Hardware Company, Inc. was located. The price tag was still on the mower. Shortly thereafter, inspection of the hardware store disclosed that a plate glass window had been broken in the front of the store. An officer of the hardware company was called to the scene. He identified the mower as being one that he had placed in the show window on “the afternoon before it was stolen.” He identified the mower by model number and by the letter “A” which he had personally marked on the bottom of the mower before placing *208it in the window. The mower found in the possession of the defendant along with another mower was in the show window when he locked and left the store about 6 p.m. on 28 August 1970. The other mower was found two days later under some bushes behind the store. The evidence was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion and his assignment of error is overruled. In the entire trial we find no error.

No error.

Judges Brock and Morris concur.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001097

21-JAN-2016

07:49 AM
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 16-1981

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

FORREST T. GOODWIN, JR.,

Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court, issued on August 8, 2017, is

amended as follows:

On page 6, lines 7 and 24, "foregoing" is replaced with

"forgoing"
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-427-818]


Low Enriched Uranium From France; Extension of Time Limit for the 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 6, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley or Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3148 or (202) 482-2371.

Background

    On March 23, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on low enriched 
uranium from France, covering the period February 1, 2004, through 
January 31, 2005. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 14643 
(March 23, 2005).

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') 
requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an 
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the 
anniversary month of an antidumping duty order for which a review is 
requested and issue the final results within 120 days after the date on 
which the preliminary results are published. However, if the Department 
finds it is not practicable to complete the review within the time 
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend 
these deadlines to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.
    Due to the complex nature of the case and the need to issue 
supplemental questionnaires, the Department finds that it is not 
practicable to complete the preliminary results in this administrative 
review of low enriched uranium from France by October 31, 2005. 
Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of 
the preliminary results until no later than February 28, 2006, in 
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The deadline for the 
final results of the administrative review continues to be 120 days 
after the publication of the preliminary results.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-20162 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, November 4, 2005.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-20878  Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M