alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Michael D. Weaver,certify that:

 

1.               I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Otelco Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.              evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.               all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:   May 9, 2005

 

 
|    /s/ Michael D. Weaver    |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael D. Weaver                          |   |
| *President & Chief Executive  Officer* |   |

 

----
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CAROLYN STEVEY PROCTOR

No. 727SC814

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Criminal Law § 25— plea of nolo contendere — showing of voluntariness in record

The record affirmatively shows that defendant’s plea of *nolo contendere*to the crime of feloniously receiving stolen property was voluntarily and understandingly entered.

Appeal by defendant from *Martin (Perry), Judge,*7 August 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Edgecombe County.

Defendant, represented by counsel, entered a plea of *nolo contendere*to the crime of feloniously *receiving*stolen property. Judgment was entered imposing an active prison sentence.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by H. A. Cole, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for the State.*

*Taylor, Brinson & Aycock by William W. Aycock, Jr. for defendant appellant.*

*651VAUGHN, Judge.

No exceptions were entered at the trial before Judge Martin. Several days after the entry of judgment, defendant expressed a desire to appeal. Counsel for defendant, with appropriate candor, concedes that he is unable to discover or assign error but states that defendant now contends that the plea was not voluntarily and understandingly entered. The record contains the transcript of defendant’s plea and the court’s adjudication thereon. It clearly and affirmatively appears that the plea was voluntarily and understandingly entered. The court’s adjudication thereon is supported by the evidence developed in open court and is affirmed. *State v. Ford,*281 N.C. 62, 187 S.E. 2d 741.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Graham concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20828]



[[Page 60604]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Senior Executive Service Combined Performance Review Board

AGENCY: United States Mint, Treasury Department.

ACTION: Notice of appointment of members to the Combined Performance 
Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Combined Performance Review Board (Board) 
for the United States Mint, the Financial Management Service (FMS), the 
Bureau of Public Debt (BPD), the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) 
and the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). The Combined 
PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives 
below the level of bureau head and principal deputy in the five 
bureaus, except for executives below the Assistant Commissioner level 
in the FMS. The Combined PRB makes recommendations regarding proposed 
performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses and other appropriate 
personnel actions.

Composition of Combined PRB

    The Combined PRB shall consist of at least three voting members. In 
case of an appraisal of a career appointee, more than half of the 
members shall consist of career appointees. The names and titles of the 
Combined PRB members are as follows:

Primary Members

Jerry Horton, Associate Director, Chief Information Officer (Acting 
Deputy Director, United States Mint).
John Manfreda, Administrator, TTB.
Pamela J. Gardiner, Associate Director (Management), BEP.
Cynthia Z. Springer, Assistant Commissioner (Office of Information 
Technology), BPD.
Judy Tillman, Assistant Commissioner, Regional Operations, FMS.

Alternate Members

Marcia Coates, Senior Advisor, United States Mint.
James Martin Mills, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services, 
FMS.
Gregory D. Carper, Associate Director, CFO, BEP.
John R. Swales, Assistant Commissioner (Office of Securities 
Operations), BPD.
Vicky McDowell, Deputy Administrator, TTB.

DATES: Membership is effective on September 30, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Horton, Associate Director, 
Chief Information Officer (Acting Deputy Director, United States Mint), 
United States Mint, 801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 
Telephone Number: (202) 772-7000.
    This notice does not meet the Department's criteria for significant 
regulations.

    Dated: October 12, 2005.
Jerry Horton,
Associate Director, Chief Information Officer, (Acting Deputy 
Director), United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 05-20828 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5102 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish an annual production 

incentive fee with respect to Federal onshore and offshore lands that 

are subject to a lease for production of oil or natural gas under which 

production is not occurring, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2010 

Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, 

Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HODES, Mr. YARMUTH, 

Mr. WELCH, and Ms. SUTTON) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish an annual 

production incentive fee with respect to Federal onshore 

and offshore lands that are subject to a lease for production of oil or natural gas under which production is 

not occurring, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Explo5 ration on Idle Tracts Act’’ or the ‘‘USE IT Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5102 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRODUCTION INCENTIVE FEE. 

2 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior 

3 shall, within 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

4 Act, issue regulations to establish an annual production 

5 incentive fee with respect to Federal onshore and offshore 

6 lands that are subject to a lease for production of oil or 

7 natural gas under which production is not occurring. Such 

8 fee shall apply with respect to lands that are subject to 

9 such a lease that is in effect on the date final regulations 

10 are promulgated under this subsection or that is issued 

11 thereafter. 

12 (b) AMOUNT.—The amount of the fee shall be, for 

13 each acre of land from which oil or natural gas is produced 

14 for less than 90 days in a calendar year— 

15 (1) for each of the first 3 years of the lease, $4 

16 per acre in 2010 dollars; 

17 (2) for the fourth year of the lease, $6 per acre 

18 in 2010 dollars; and 

19 (3) for the fifth year of the lease and each year 

20 thereafter for which the lease is otherwise in effect, 

21 $8 per acre in 2010 dollars. 

22 (c) ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION.—The Secretary 

23 shall assess and collect the fee established under this sec24 tion. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5102 IH

1 (d) DEPOSIT.—Amounts received by the United 

2 States as the fee under this section shall be deposited in 

3 the general fund of the Treasury. 

4 (e) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of the Interior 

5 may issue regulations to prevent evasion of the fee under 

6 this section. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act provides that if part of a registration
statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a
security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at
the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may
assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be
named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having
prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 302
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, George M. Lee, certify that:1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 21, 2005 /s/ George M. LeeGeorge M. LeeChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT





Each of
the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 15, 2010
            /s/
      Van Z. Krikorian
              Van
      Z. Krikorian
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      April 15, 2010
            /s/
      Jan E. Dulman
              Jan
      E. Dulman
              Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. US Precious Metals, Inc. Dated: January 19, 2011  /s/ Dave BurneyDave BurneyPresident(Principal Executive Officer)  /s/ Jack Wagenti Jack WagentiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GEORGE SYLVESTER FOSTER

No. 7428SC152

(Filed 3 April 1974)

Appeal by defendant from *Anglin, Judge,*at the 13 August 1973 Criminal Session of Buncombe County Superior Court.

Heard in the Court of Appeals 19 March 1974.

The defendant was tried under three bills of indictment charging him with armed robbery, kidnapping, and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious bodily injury not resulting in death.

The State offered Goldie Dotson who identified the defendant as the man who held a sawed-off shotgun on her while a codefendant demanded and got money from her while she was on duty at the 7-11 Store on Biltmore Avenue in the City of Asheville. She testified she saw them commandeer one Roy Lee Burrell and take him and his truck and leave the store at a high rate of speed going north on Biltmore Avenue. The defendants took approximately $341.00. Roy L. Burrell testifed that he was grabbed and forced to his truck at gunpoint; that when he did not move fast enough, he was shot in the leg and then pushed in the middle of the truck between the two defendants and forcibly carried to the intersection of Biltmore Avenue and Victoria Road where his truck was wrecked. Burrell further *227testified that he spent several weeks in the hospital, and that he is permanently injured, his injuries necessitating his having to wear a brace on his leg for the remainder of his life.

The defendant testified that he was not in Asheville at the time of the robbery and was living in Wilson, North Carolina.

Defendant was convicted of three charges and sentenced to forty-seven years in the State Prison for the kidnapping, fifteen years for the armed robbery, and five years for the lesser included offense of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury, all sentences to run concurrently.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney General Keith L. Jarvis for the State.*

*Robert L. Harrell for defendant appellant.*

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This case presents only the face of the record for review. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Morris and Vaughn concur.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BILLY JACK COOK

No. 7121SC183

(Filed 26 May 1971)

Criminal Law § 155.5— docketing of appeal

Court of Appeals *ex mero motu*dismisses defendant’s appeal for failure to docket the record on appeal within the time provided by the rules. Court of Appeals Rule No. 5.

Appeal by defendant from *Crissman, Judge,*8 September 1970 Criminal Session of Forsyth Superior Court.

Defendant was tried in superior court on (1) a warrant from the district court charging malicious injury to personal property, and (2) a bill of indictment charging an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the malicious injury to personal property charge and guilty of assault with deadly weapon on the other charge. From judgments imposing prison sentences in both cases, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Millard R. Rich, Jr., for the State.*

*White, Crumpler and PfefferJcorn by Fred G. Crumpler, Jr., and Michael J. Lewis for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

The judgments appealed from were entered on 11 September 1970. The record on appeal was docketed in this court on 19 January 1971. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice of this Court provides that if the record on appeal is not docketed within 90 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, the case may be dismissed; provided, the trial tribunal may, for good cause, extend the time for docketing not exceeding 60 days. No order extending the time for docketing appears in the record before us. For failure to comply with the rules, the appeal, *ex mero motu,*is dismissed. *State v. Isley,*8 N.C. App. 599, 174 S.E. 2d 623 (1970); *State v. Stovall,*7 N.C. App. 73, 171 S.E. 2d 84 (1970); *State v. Justice,*3 N.C. App. 363, 165 S.E. 2d 47 (1968).

*440Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed the record, with particular reference to the assignments of error brought forward and argued in defendant’s brief, and find that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on October 27, 2005, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Introductions and Interest in the Meeting.
    2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    3. Industry Presentation.
    4. New business.

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 
Yvette Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#572e2427253e3930322517353e247933383479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6afa5a6a4bfb8b1b3a496b4bfa5f8b2b9b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on October 7, 2005, pursuant 
to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app. 2 10(d)), that the portion of this meeting dealing with 
pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. export 
control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining 
portions of the meeting will be open to the public. For more 
information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-4814.

    Dated: October 7, 2005.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20576 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

THERON HUNTER

NO. 2022 KW 0282

JULY 51 2022

In Re: Theron Hunter, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 

332, 644. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ. 

PMC

JEW

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
##### 



Exhibit 10.14
 
 Amendment Number Twelve NC Mortgage NC Capital NC Credit Citigroup Letter Agreement
 RECITALS




---



##### 



Fees and Expenses
 Defined Terms
 Representations
 Limited Effect
 GOVERNING LAW
 Counterparts
  -2-




---



##### 



CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.By:
    
    /s/ Bobbie TheivakumaranName:
    
    Bobbie TheivakumaranTitle:
    
    Authorized AgentNC CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    PresidentNEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    Executive Vice PresidentNEW CENTURY CREDIT CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    President