I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5024 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants to improve access 

to, sharing of, and use of, education data to improve student outcomes, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2010 

Mr. HOLT (for himself and Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants 

to improve access to, sharing of, and use of, education 

data to improve student outcomes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Measuring and Evalu5 ating Trends for Reliability, Integrity, and Continued Suc6 cess (METRICS) Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

8 In this Act: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (1) CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; IN2 STRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; LEARNING

3 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.—The terms ‘‘curriculum 

4 management system’’, ‘‘instructional management 

5 system’’, and ‘‘learning management system’’ mean 

6 an electronic software system used by educators to 

7 regularly assess students’ performance as compared 

8 to standards and align specific and individual cur9 riculum activities to students’ needs. 

10 (2) EARLY WARNING INDICATORS.—The term 

11 ‘‘early warning indicators’’ means student data used 

12 to identify and intervene with students who are off13 track to graduation or postsecondary success. 

14 (3) INTEGRATED STATEWIDE EDUCATION LON15 GITUDINAL DATA SYSTEMS.—The term ‘‘integrated 

16 statewide education longitudinal data systems’’ 

17 means one or more statewide data systems that 

18 house and link individual students’ longitudinal early 

19 childhood, elementary, secondary, and postsecondary 

20 education and workforce data. 

21 (4) STUDENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYS22 TEM.—The term ‘‘student information management 

23 system’’ means an electronic data system used to 

24 hold individual student and teacher information, 

25 data, and records. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5024 IH

1 SEC. 3. IMPROVING THE USE OF STATEWIDE LONGITU2 DINAL DATA SYSTEMS. 

3 (a) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Edu4 cation is authorized to award grants of up to 5 years, on 

5 a competitive basis, to State educational agencies to en6 able such agencies to improve access to, sharing of, and 

7 use of, education data to improve student outcomes. 

8 (b) ELIGIBILITY.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—To be eligible to receive a 

10 grant under this section, a State educational agency 

11 shall have integrated statewide education longitu12 dinal data systems that includes the following: 

13 (A) The required data elements of a state14 wide education longitudinal data system de15 scribed in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America 

16 COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871(e)(2)(D)). 

17 (B) The following design elements: 

18 (i) Compliance with section 444 of the 

19 General Education Provisions Act (20 

20 U.S.C. 1232g) (commonly known as the 

21 Family Educational Rights and Privacy 

22 Act of 1974). 

23 (ii) Ability to generate data easily for 

24 continuous improvement and decision-mak25 ing such as timely reporting to parents, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 5024 IH

1 teachers, and school leaders about student 

2 achievement. 

3 (iii) Ability to facilitate the exchange 

4 of data among agencies within a State and 

5 between States utilizing standard data 

6 structures, standards, formats, and data 

7 definitions. 

8 (iv) A data warehouse, data reposi9 tory, or systemic capacity to link statewide 

10 data systems that stores, organizes, and 

11 links student, school, and district informa12 tion over time with the ability to customize 

13 queries. 

14 (v) A State data audit process to en15 sure data quality, validity, and reliability. 

16 (2) EXCEPTION.—A State educational agencies 

17 is deemed to satisfy the requirement of paragraph 

18 (1) if it demonstrates that it has developed and is 

19 implementing a plan that will result in the existence 

20 of integrated statewide education longitudinal data 

21 systems described in such paragraph. 

22 (c) USES OF FUNDS.— 

23 (1) REQUIRED USES OF FUNDS.—A State edu24 cational agency receiving a grant under this section 

25 shall use the funds to— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
5 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (A) expand the ability of integrated state2 wide education longitudinal data systems to link 

3 student-level data across the prekindergarten to 

4 higher education and workforce pipeline and 

5 across State agencies, through activities such 

6 as— 

7 (i) linking State data systems with 

8 early learning, postsecondary education, 

9 workforce, social services, and other critical 

10 State agency data systems; and linking 

11 data across programs and activities within 

12 State agencies; 

13 (ii) identifying processes to guide data 

14 collection, sharing and use; and 

15 (iii) improving State data warehouses, 

16 repositories, or systemic capacity to link 

17 statewide data systems across agencies; 

18 (B) improve opportunities to access, ana19 lyze, and use data from integrated statewide 

20 education longitudinal data systems, through 

21 activities such as— 

22 (i) creating portals for teachers, lead23 ers, parents, students, and the public to 

24 access data in a way that respects student 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
6 

•HR 5024 IH

1 and educator privacy and is appropriate to 

2 each stakeholder’s role; 

3 (ii) creating progress reports with in4 dividual student data that provide informa5 tion educators, parents and students can 

6 use to improve student performance; 

7 (iii) creating reports that include lon8 gitudinal statistics on school systems and 

9 groups of students to guide school-, 

10 district- and State-level improvement ef11 forts; and 

12 (iv) making data efficiently available 

13 to researchers, analysts, and evaluators, 

14 consistent with student and educator pri15 vacy protections, to facilitate the identifica16 tion of effective programs and practices 

17 through data analysis; and 

18 (C) build the capacity of teachers, leaders, 

19 parents, students, researchers, and the public to 

20 use longitudinal data for effective decision21 making, through activities such as— 

22 (i) implementing strategies to ensure 

23 that educators know how to access, ana24 lyze, and use data appropriately, through 

25 activities such as— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
7 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (I) providing data integrity train2 ing at the school and local educational 

3 agency levels to address technology 

4 maintenance needs at the school and 

5 local educational agency levels, privacy 

6 policies (including training relating to 

7 section 444 of the General Education 

8 Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g) 

9 (commonly known as the Family Edu10 cational Rights and Privacy Act of 

11 1974)), data integrity issues, report 

12 planning, and processes; 

13 (II) providing professional devel14 opment to teachers, office personnel, 

15 and school and local educational agen16 cy administrators about how to col17 lect, verify, report, access, and use 

18 data; 

19 (III) embedding data and assess20 ment literacy skills into credentialing 

21 requirements; or 

22 (IV) developing partnerships with 

23 pre-service educator programs to im24 prove educators’ data and assessment 

25 literacy; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
8 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (ii) raising public and policymaker 

2 awareness of available data and how to ac3 cess, analyze and use it; 

4 (iii) collaborating with universities, re5 searchers, organizations, intermediaries, or 

6 other experts to conduct research using 

7 longitudinal data; 

8 (iv) training dedicated personnel to 

9 support the collection, submission, and 

10 public reporting of data requirements 

11 under this Act and the Elementary and 

12 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

13 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.); and 

14 (v) building State agency capacity for 

15 research, analyses, and evaluation using 

16 longitudinal data. 

17 (2) ALLOWABLE USES OF FUNDS.—A State 

18 educational agency receiving a grant under this sec19 tion may provide funds to local educational agencies, 

20 consortia of local educational agencies, and institu21 tions of higher education for activities to improve ca22 pacity of educators to use longitudinal data for ef23 fective decisionmaking. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
9 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (d) APPLICATIONS.—Each State educational agency 

2 desiring a grant under this section shall submit an appli3 cation to the Secretary that includes the following: 

4 (1) A description of how the State’s data sys5 tem currently meets the eligibility requirements of 

6 subsection (b) through— 

7 (A) a demonstration of the State data sys8 tem’s current capabilities; and 

9 (B) a description of plans and funding al10 ready in place to meet those requirements. 

11 (2) A description of the State’s integrated 

12 statewide education longitudinal data systems’ cur13 rent ability to match student-level postsecondary 

14 education data to data from other State systems, in15 cluding workforce development, unemployment insur16 ance, child welfare, juvenile justice, military services 

17 information systems, and migrant students records 

18 system. 

19 (3) A description of previous Federal and non20 Federal funds the State has received for building 

21 and expanding integrated statewide education longi22 tudinal data systems, including funds received under 

23 section 208 of the Educational Technical Assistance 

24 Act of 2002 (20 U.S.C. 9607) and section 6401 of 

25 the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871). 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
10 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (4) A description of how activities funded under 

2 the grant will align, coordinate with, and advance re3 lated activities funded through other Federal pro4 grams, including the programs under section 208 of 

5 the Educational Technical Assistance Act of 2002 

6 (20 U.S.C. 9607) and section 6401 of the America 

7 COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871), early childhood 

8 education programs, and workforce development pro9 grams. 

10 (5) A description of how the activities funded 

11 under the grant will promote the sharing of best 

12 practices related to data collection, access, and 

13 usage. 

14 (6) A description of how the activities funded 

15 under the grant will advance the utility of integrated 

16 statewide education longitudinal data systems. 

17 (7) A description of how the State will coordi18 nate the development of integrated statewide longi19 tudinal data systems linking early childhood, elemen20 tary, secondary, postsecondary, and workforce data 

21 with local education agencies using common data 

22 standards and definitions to ensure comparability 

23 and interoperability throughout the State. 

24 (8) A description of how the State will enable 

25 the exchange of data with local education agencies 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
11 

•HR 5024 IH

1 by utilizing standard data structures, standards, for2 mats, and data definitions. 

3 (9) A budget that details how grant funds and 

4 other resources will be used to carry out the activi5 ties described in subsection (c). 

6 (10) If awarding subgrants under subsection 

7 (c)(2), a description of the process for selecting, 

8 monitoring, and evaluating subgrantees. 

9 (11) An assurance that the State has a long10 term commitment to implementing and supporting 

11 its integrated statewide education longitudinal data 

12 systems. 

13 (12) A description of the State’s governance 

14 structure that defines data collection, access, and 

15 use. 

16 (13) Other information as reasonably required 

17 by the Secretary. 

18 (e) STUDENT PRIVACY.—The data system required 

19 by subsection (b)(1) may provide for the disclosure of per20 sonally identifiable information from students’ education 

21 records, without written parental consent, between the 

22 system and authorized representatives of State or local 

23 public agencies responsible for early childhood education, 

24 postsecondary education, workforce development, unem25 ployment insurance, child health and welfare, mental 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
12 

•HR 5024 IH

1 health, juvenile justice, or child protective services to ad2 dress the education, employment, and social welfare needs 

3 of individuals that they serve and to evaluate or audit such 

4 program if interagency agreements or State laws or regu5 lations provide for the protection of that information in 

6 a manner which will not permit the personal identification 

7 of students and their parents by other than representa8 tives of such agencies with a legitimate interest to carry 

9 out these purposes. 

10 (f) AWARDING OF GRANTS.— 

11 (1) PEER REVIEW.—In awarding grants under 

12 this section, the Secretary shall use a peer review 

13 process that ensures that the selected proposals have 

14 technical quality, validity, and reliability, promotes 

15 linkages across States, and protects student privacy 

16 consistent with section 444 of the General Education 

17 Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g) (commonly known 

18 as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act 

19 of 1974). 

20 (2) COMPETITIVE PRIORITY.—The Secretary 

21 and peer review process shall give a competitive pri22 ority to— 

23 (A) States that propose coordinating ef24 forts with local education agencies; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
13 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (B) States that propose to coordinate ef2 forts or work together. 

3 (3) GRANT PERIOD.—The Secretary shall 

4 award a grant under this section for a period of not 

5 more than 5 years. 

6 (g) SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT.—Funds made 

7 available under this section shall be used to supplement, 

8 and not supplant, other State or local funds used for de9 veloping integrated statewide longitudinal data systems 

10 linking early childhood, elementary, secondary, postsec11 ondary, and workforce data. 

12 (h) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the award13 ing of grants under this section, and annually thereafter, 

14 the Secretary of Education shall make publicly available 

15 a report on the implementation and effectiveness of uses 

16 of funds under this section. 

17 (i) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

19 $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 and for each succeeding 

20 fiscal year. 

21 SEC. 4. IMPROVING LOCAL USE OF DATA TO IMPROVE STU22 DENT OUTCOMES. 

23 (a) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Edu24 cation is authorized to award grants of up to 5 years of 

25 sufficient size and scope, on a competitive basis, to eligible 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
14 

•HR 5024 IH

1 local education agencies, or consortia of eligible local edu2 cation agencies, to improve educators’ use of data to im3 prove teaching, learning, and student outcomes. 

4 (b) ELIGIBILITY.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—To be eligible to receive a 

6 grant under this section, a local educational agency 

7 shall be high-need. 

8 (2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of paragraph 

9 (1)— 

10 (A) the term ‘‘graduation rate’’ has the 

11 meaning given the term in section 

12 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi) of the Elementary and Sec13 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

14 6311(b)(2)(C)(vi)), as clarified in section 

15 200.19(b)(1) of title 34, Code of Federal Regu16 lations; and 

17 (B) the term ‘‘high-need’’, when used with 

18 respect to a local educational agency, means 

19 that the agency— 

20 (i) is eligible for assistance under part 

21 A of title I of the Elementary and Sec22 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

23 6311 et seq.); and 

24 (ii) serves at least one school that is— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
15 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (I) in corrective action or restruc2 turing under section 1116 of the Ele3 mentary and Secondary Education 

4 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316); or 

5 (II) has a four-year graduation 

6 rate of less than 60 percent. 

7 (c) USES OF FUNDS.— 

8 (1) REQUIRED USES OF FUNDS.—A local edu9 cational agency receiving a grant under this section 

10 shall use the funds to develop and implement a com11 prehensive plan for using data to improve teaching, 

12 learning, and student outcomes. The plan must in13 clude strategies designed to— 

14 (A) provide teachers, leaders, parents, stu15 dents, researchers, and the public with access to 

16 student education data in a way that respects 

17 student and educator privacy; 

18 (B) coordinate with State agency efforts to 

19 build the integrated statewide longitudinal data 

20 systems; 

21 (C) regularly analyze and share student 

22 education data with educators, counselors and 

23 school staff, parents, and students, through ac24 tivities such as— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
16 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (i) using key indicators of progress, 

2 such as early warning indicators or the re3 sults on local educational agency interim 

4 tests; 

5 (ii) providing school-based staff with 

6 school-level analyses and comparative per7 formance results for schools served by the 

8 local educational agency and other schools 

9 enrolling students with similar demo10 graphic profiles to schools on a regular 

11 basis; 

12 (iii) publicly reporting school-level 

13 data on school report cards; 

14 (iv) embedding additional key indica15 tors, such as percent of students on-track 

16 to graduation, into local accountability and 

17 improvement systems; 

18 (v) sharing data to guide school and 

19 classroom instructional decisions and prac20 tices; 

21 (vi) regularly discussing data and 

22 school improvement plans with school lead23 ership teams; or 

24 (vii) using data to communicate effec25 tively with parents and other stakeholders; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
17 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (D) improve school leaders’ use of data to 

2 guide school improvement efforts and support 

3 classroom use of data through high-quality 

4 training and professional development address5 ing issues such as— 

6 (i) establishing a culture of data use; 

7 (ii) improving teachers’ data literacy; 

8 or 

9 (iii) data-informed instruction, such 

10 as how results from interim or formative 

11 tests can be used to re-configure small12 group instruction; 

13 (E) improve teachers’ effective use of data 

14 through on-going, sustainable, and high-quality 

15 professional development activities that address 

16 issues such as— 

17 (i) educators’ data literacy; 

18 (ii) use of data to individualize in19 struction and interventions; 

20 (iii) use of technology to facilitate im21 proved and personalized instruction; and 

22 (iv) development and regular use of 

23 formative assessment; 

24 (F) ensure that source data used at the 

25 local level is consistent with source data used to 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
18 

•HR 5024 IH

1 report indicators as required by State or Fed2 eral law; and 

3 (G) provide training to address use of data 

4 collection software, privacy policies (including 

5 training relating to section 444 of the General 

6 Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g) 

7 (commonly known as the Family Educational 

8 Rights and Privacy Act of 1974)), data integ9 rity issues, report planning, and processes. 

10 (2) ALLOWABLE USES OF FUNDS.—To enable 

11 grantees to implement strategies to meet the re12 quirements of paragraph (1), a local educational 

13 agency receiving a grant under this section may use 

14 the funds— 

15 (A) to build or improve longitudinal stu16 dent data systems that allow for management, 

17 analysis, disaggregation, and State, Federal, 

18 and public reporting of student, teacher and 

19 school data that— 

20 (i) includes the data elements and de21 sign features described in section 

22 6401)(e)(2)(D) of the America COM23 PETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871(e)(2)(D)); 

24 (ii) conforms and aligns with state25 wide common data standards and definiVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:33 Apr 15, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5024.IH H5024

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
19 

•HR 5024 IH

1 tions for linking data systems and sharing 

2 information; and 

3 (iii) includes additional local data ele4 ments, such as— 

5 (I) student-level attendance, be6 havior, or other information; 

7 (II) student participation in pro8 grams or interventions; 

9 (III) interim, benchmark, or 

10 formative assessment information; 

11 (IV) parental educational and lit12 eracy status; or 

13 (V) teacher attendance and par14 ticipation in formal professional devel15 opment sessions; 

16 (B) to use new assessment tools that pro17 vide timely data to educators that can be used 

18 to identify individual students’ learning needs 

19 and guide appropriate, personalized instruc20 tional interventions such as— 

21 (i) formative assessment; 

22 (ii) interim or benchmark assessment 

23 systems; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
20 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (iii) curriculum management systems, 

2 instructional management systems, or 

3 learning management systems; or 

4 (iv) other tools and resources; 

5 (C) to analyze and disseminate best prac6 tices, strategies, and approaches regarding ped7 agogical advancement that will leverage the 

8 data system to enhance teaching and learning, 

9 including opportunities for individualized in10 struction; or 

11 (D) to hire of staff, at the central office or 

12 school level, to support data use. 

13 (d) APPLICATIONS.—Each local educational agency 

14 desiring a grant under this section shall submit an appli15 cation to the Secretary that includes the following: 

16 (1) A description of how the local education 

17 agency currently reports to, accesses, and uses the 

18 integrated statewide education longitudinal data sys19 tems. 

20 (2) A description of the local education agency’s 

21 current data systems. 

22 (3) A description of how activities funded under 

23 the grant will improve access to, and use of, data 

24 provided by the current data systems at the local 

25 and State level. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
21 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (4) A description of how the activities funded 

2 under the grant will successfully integrate with the 

3 design and functionality of the integrated statewide 

4 education longitudinal data systems. 

5 (5) A description of how the activities funded 

6 under the grant will promote the sharing of best 

7 practices related to data collection, access, and 

8 usage. 

9 (6) A description of how the applicant will use 

10 funds received under this section to improve teach11 ing, learning, and student outcomes and carry out 

12 the activities described in subsection (c). 

13 (7) A description of how the applicant will so14 licit the feedback of educators, school leaders, and 

15 parents in developing, revising, and implementing 

16 plans and activities. 

17 (8) A description of how the applicant will align 

18 its use of funds under this section to the local edu19 cational agency technology plan and to the local edu20 cation agency plan for improving student achieve21 ment. 

22 (9) An analysis of current resources at the 

23 school and local educational agency level to ensure 

24 participating jurisdictions have the technology, such 

25 as Internet connections, bandwidth, computing 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
22 

•HR 5024 IH

1 power, software, servers, and hard disk space, and 

2 data security necessary to successfully implement 

3 the data collection, reporting, assessment processes, 

4 and content delivery the system demands. 

5 (10) A description of the indicators the appli6 cants will use to determine if funds are effectively 

7 used and their impact on improving teaching, learn8 ing, and student outcomes. 

9 (11) If applying as a consortium of local edu10 cation agencies, the role of each. 

11 (12) Such other information as the Secretary 

12 may reasonably require. 

13 (e) AWARDING OF GRANTS.— 

14 (1) PEER REVIEW.—In awarding grants under 

15 this section, the Secretary shall use a peer review 

16 process that ensures technical quality, validity and 

17 reliability, promotes linkages across States, and pro18 tects student privacy consistent with section 444 of 

19 the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 

20 1232g) (commonly known as the Family Educational 

21 Rights and Privacy Act of 1974). 

22 (2) DIVERSITY.—The Secretary shall ensure, to 

23 the extent possible, that grantees are diverse in 

24 terms of geography, size, and location within an 

25 urban, rural, or suburban area. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
23 

•HR 5024 IH

1 (3) GRANT PERIOD.—The Secretary shall 

2 award a grant under this section for a period of not 

3 more than 5 years. 

4 (f) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

5 of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Sec6 retary of Education shall make publicly available a report 

7 on the implementation and effectiveness of the uses of 

8 funds, including efforts to protect student and educator 

9 privacy, under this section. 

10 (g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

11 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

12 $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 and for each succeeding 

13 fiscal year. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS