alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4882 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4882

To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study to determine the 
  feasibility of carrying out a project to address the water resource 
development and management needs of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 
                        Reservation, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2010

  Mr. Baca (for himself, Mrs. Bono Mack, and Mr. Lewis of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study to determine the 
  feasibility of carrying out a project to address the water resource 
development and management needs of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 
                        Reservation, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS RESERVATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Army shall conduct, at 
Federal expense, a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
project to address the water resource development and management needs 
of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Reservation, California.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,700,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-78139, 333-92997, 333-100815, 333-110755, 333-123366, 333-123367, 333-133214 and 333-140425 on Form S-8; (ii) Registration Statements Nos. 333-93857 and 333-136848 on Form S-3; and
(iii) Registration No. 333-143674 on Form S-4, of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Prosperity Bancshares,
Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



|                 
|-----------------
|Houston, Texas   
|February 29, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. Dominick Romeo DELEGGE

No. 276P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of August 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Bull Run Corporation of our reports dated January 26, 1999, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gray Communications
Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Bull Run Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 1998.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-91296 and Form S-8 No. 333-56125) pertaining to the Bull Run
Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-91298) pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation Non-Employee Directors'
1994 Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-84833)
pertaining to the issuance of shares of BR Holding, Inc. of our reports dated
January 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Gray Communications Systems, Inc. incorporated herein by reference.


                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
November 8, 1999
Exhibit 99.2

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN

                               CONTIMORTGAGE CORPORATION

                               UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM    
                               FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS                  
                                                                     
                               FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998  
                               TOGETHER WITH AUDITORS' REPORT        
                                                                     

<PAGE>

                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                       Independent Accountants' Report

To the Board of Directors of ContiMortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) and that ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond
and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000 as
of December 31, 1998, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that ContiMortgage Corporation complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards and that ContiMortgage
Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000 as of December 31, 1998, is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
New York, New York
March 11, 1999
----

|                                                                                         |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                         |   |
| Name of      Subsidiary                                                                      |   | Jurisdiction      ofIncorporation      or Organization |
|                                                                                         |   |   |
| Air      Micronesia, Inc.                                                                    |   | Delaware |
| CAL      CARGO, S.A. de C.V.                                                                 |   | Mexico |
| CALFINCO      Inc.                                                                           |   | Delaware |
| Century      Casualty Company                                                                |   | Vermont |
| Continental      Airlines de Mexico, S.A.                                                    |   | Mexico |
| Continental      Airlines Domain Name Limited                                                |   | England |
| Continental      Airlines Finance Trust II                                                   |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Airlines Fuel Purchasing Group, LLC                                         |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Airlines, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust      Agreement |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Airlines Purchasing Holdings LLC                                            |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Airlines Purchasing Services LLC                                            |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Express, Inc.                                                               |   | Delaware |
| Continental      Micronesia, Inc.                                                            |   | Delaware |
| Presidents      Club of Guam, Inc.                                                           |   | Delaware |
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), DanielE. Steimle, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:           1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and           2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 8th day of November2007.       /s/ DANIEL E. STEIMLE         Daniel E. Steimle
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3-a-2


                              RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY

                            THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

                           CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AT A

                          MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 1, 2001


        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective immediately, Section 5 of
Article II of the Company's By-Laws be, and it hereby is, amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

            "SECTION 5. LIST OF SHAREOWNERS. The Secretary shall, from
    information obtained from the transfer agent, prepare and make, at least ten
    days before every meeting of shareowners, a complete list of the shareowners
    entitled to vote at the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing
    the address of each shareowner and the number of shares registered in the
    name of each shareowner. Such list shall be open to the examination of any
    shareowner, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business
    hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting: (a) on a
    reasonably accessible electronic network, provided that the information
    required to gain access to such list is provided with the notice of the
    meeting, or (b) during ordinary business hours, at the principal place of
    business of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to
    make the list available on an electronic network, the Corporation may take
    reasonable steps to ensure that such information is available only to
    shareowners of the Corporation. If the meeting is to be held at a specified
    place, then the list shall be produced and kept at the time and place of the
    meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any
    shareowner who is present. If the meeting is to be held solely by means of
    remote communication, then the list shall also be open to the examination of
    any shareowner during the whole time of the meeting on a reasonably
    accessible electronic network, and the information required to access the
    list shall be provided with the notice of the meeting. The stock ledger
    shall be the only evidence as to who are the shareowners entitled to examine
    the stock ledger, the list referred to in this section or the books of the
    Corporation, or to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of
    shareowners.";
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Vardakis, President and Treasurer, of Syntony Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Quarterly Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.

Dated: May 15, 2006                  Signature:/s/Michael Vardakis
                                     Michael Vardakis
                                     President and Treasurer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4931 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2012 include a benchmark 

plan to eliminate the budget deficit by fiscal year 2020 and that subsequent resolutions adhere to that plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. KLEIN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require 

that the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 

year 2012 include a benchmark plan to eliminate the 

budget deficit by fiscal year 2020 and that subsequent 

resolutions adhere to that plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENCHMARK BUDGET PLAN. 

4 (a) INITIAL PLAN.—Section 301 of the Congressional 

5 Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subsection: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4931 IH

1 ‘‘(j) BENCHMARK BUDGET PLAN.—(1) The concur2 rent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2012 shall 

3 include a detailed benchmark plan to reduce discretionary 

4 spending to eliminate the budget deficit by fiscal year 

5 2020. 

6 ‘‘(2) The concurrent resolution on the budget for 

7 each of fiscal years 2013 through 2020 shall be in compli8 ance with such plan, but shall include any necessary ad9 justments to meet the goal of the plan. 

10 ‘‘(3) If the Committee on the Budget of the House 

11 of Representatives or the Senate determines that an eco12 nomic emergency exists, then it shall include such a state13 ment in the applicable concurrent resolution on the budget 

14 stating that an economic emergency exists. If such a state15 ment is included, then— 

16 ‘‘(A) the detailed benchmark plan to eliminate 

17 the budget deficit by fiscal year 2020 is not required 

18 to be included in that concurrent resolution under 

19 this subsection; and 

20 ‘‘(B) the fiscal year by which the benchmark 

21 plan is to eliminate the budget deficit shall be post22 poned by one fiscal year.’’. 

23 (b) POINT OF ORDER.—Section 312 of the Congres24 sional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the 

25 end the following new subsection: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4931 IH

1 ‘‘(g) DEFICIT REDUICTION POINT OF ORDER.—It 

2 shall not be in order in the House of Representatives or 

3 the Senate to consider any concurrent resolution on the 

4 budget for any fiscal year through 2020 if it is in violation 

5 of section 301(j).’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THREE-FIFTHS REQUIREMENT IN THE SENATE. 

7 Subsections (c)(2) and (d)(3) of section 904 of the 

8 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are amended by strik9 ing ‘‘and 312(c)’’ each place it appears and inserting 

10 ‘‘312(c), and 312(g)’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Motion Denied as moot; Order filed August 8, 2017. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00399-CR

____________

ALISHA NICOLE NELSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1505033

ORDER

On August 2, 2017, Appellant Alisha Nicole Nelson filed a signed, written 

request to withdraw her notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. On July 18, 

2017, this court issued an opinion in this case dismissing appellant’s appeal based 

upon testimony at a hearing before the trial court that appellant did not want to 

continue her appeal. See Nelson v. State, No. 14-17-00399-CR, 2017 WL 3045814 

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet. h.). 
As an opinion has been issued in this case, we deny appellant’s request as 

moot. Based on appellant’s motion, we direct the clerk of court to issue the 

mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
FILED

September 19, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

SEPTEMBER SESSION, 1997

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9611-CR-00390

)

Appellee, )

)

) SHELBY COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JOSEPH B. DAILEY

KARL HAMILTON a.k.a. ) JUDGE

RANDOLPH PRUITT, )

)

Appellant. ) (Burglary)

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE

CRIMINAL COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

WALKER GWINN JOHN KNOX WALKUP

Assistant Public Defender Attorney General and Reporter

201 Poplar, Suite 2-01

Memphis, TN 38103 GEORGIA BLYTHE FELNER

Assistant Attorney General

425 5th Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37243

JOHN W. PIEROTTI

District Attorney General

DAVID HENRY

Assistant District Attorney General

Criminal Justice Complex, Suite 301

201 Poplar Street

Memphis, TN 38103

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
-2-

ORDER

The Defendant was convicted on a jury verdict of one count of burglary.

He was sentenced as a career offender to twelve years in the Department of

Correction. In this appeal he argues that the evidence introduced against him is

insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the

trial court.

The proof showed that a Memphis public elementary school’s silent alarm

system activated at approximately 2:30 a.m. on June 16, 1995. Two police

cruisers promptly responded. As they arrived, the officers heard someone yell

“Police” and saw the Defendant running from a “cubbyhole” area at the back of

the school. He was apprehended immediately. He spontaneously told the

officers that it was not his idea to break into the school, and that some guys had

offered him some of the property for helping. In the “cubbyhole” area, a window

had been forced open. Some tools and food items were located near the

window. A television and a VCR belonging to the school were found in the

school’s playground area. No other suspects were found.

We conclude that the evidence presented is sufficient to support the finding

by the trier of fact of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We further conclude that

no error of law requiring a reversal of the judgment is apparent on the record. 

Based upon a thorough reading of the record, the briefs of the parties, and

the law governing the issues presented for review, the judgment of the trial court
-3-

is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of

Tennessee.

_______________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

___________________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 372

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CR-14-771

JEFFERY DALE HARDY

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

OPINION DELIVERED JUNE 17, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-2009-1000]

HONORABLE RANDY F.

PHILHOURS, JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO

WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge

Jeffery Hardy pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a controlled substance,

marijuana, a Class C felony, and was sentenced to two years of probation on March 22, 2010. 

The State filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probation on March 9, 2012, and his

probation was subsequently revoked after the circuit court found that he had violated the

conditions of his probation by failing to pay fines, costs, and fees as directed.1 On appeal,

Hardy’s counsel argues that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and asks to withdraw

as counsel. The clerk of this court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to

Hardy in accordance with Rule 4-3(k)(2) (2014) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme

Court, informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Hardy has not filed any

1The sentencing order was filed on May 28, 2014, after the hearing on the State’s

petition was rescheduled multiple times for reasons unexplained in the record.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 372

pro se points. Because counsel has complied with the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we grant

the motion to withdraw and affirm.

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but

whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Gaines v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 651. Based on

our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Hardy’s appeal is wholly without

merit. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App.

301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion

to withdraw and affirming the circuit court’s revocation.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

VIRDEN and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Shaun Hair, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

No response.

2