Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules 61589 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet or more above the 

surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AAL AK E5 Tok Junction, AK [New] 

Tok Junction Airport, AK 

(Lat. 63°19′46′′ N., long. 142°57′13′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile 

radius of the Tok Junction Airport, and that 

airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet 

above the surface within a 64.8-mile radius 

of the Tok Junction Airport. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Anchorage, AK, on October 14, 

2005. 

Judith G. Heckl, 

Area Director, Alaska Flight Service 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 05–21232 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Minerals Management Service 

30 CFR Part 250 

RIN 1010–AD10 

Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in 

the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)—

Plans and Information—Protection of 

Marine Mammals and Threatened and 

Endangered Species 

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service 

(MMS), Interior. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: MMS is extending to January 

6, 2006, the comment period of the 

proposed rule titled, ‘‘Oil and Gas and 

Sulphur Operations in the Outer 

Continental Shelf (OCS)—Plans and 

Information—Protection of Marine 

Mammals and Threatened and 

Endangered Species’’ published on 

September 6, 2005 (70 FR 52953). The 

previous deadline for comments was 

November 7, 2005. This notice will 

extend the original 60-day comment 

period to 120 days. This extension is 

necessary because of damage caused in 

the New Orleans area by Hurricane 

Katrina and the Louisiana/Texas area by 

Hurricane Rita and subsequent flooding. 

The extension will provide additional 

time to the oil and gas industry for 

reviewing and preparing comments to 

the rule as it recovers from these 

disasters. 

DATES: MMS will consider all comments 

received by January 6, 2006. MMS will 

begin reviewing comments then and 

may not fully consider comments 

received after January 6, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on the rulemaking by any of the 

following methods listed below. Please 

use the Regulation Identifier Number 

(RIN) 1010–AD10 in your message. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions on the website for 

submitting comments. 

• E-mail MMS at 

rules.comments@mms.gov. Use 1010–

AD10 in the subject line. 

• Fax: 703–787–1546. Identify with 

1010–AD10. 

• Mail or hand-carry comments to the 

Department of the Interior; Minerals 

Management Service; Attention: Rules 

Processing Team (RPT); 381 Elden 

Street, MS–4024; Herndon, Virginia 

20170–4817. Please reference ‘‘Plans 

and Information—Protection of Marine 

Mammals and Threatened and 

Endangered Species—1010–AD10’’ in 

your comments. 

You may also send comments on the 

information collection aspects of this 

rule directly to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

OMB Attention: Desk Officer for the 

Department of the Interior (1010–10) via 

OMB e-mail: 

(OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by 

fax (202) 395–6566; identify with 1010–

AD10. Please also send a copy to MMS. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kumkum Ray, Regulations and 

Standards Branch at (703) 787–1604. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Lessees 

and operators with operations in the 

Gulf of Mexico Region are engaged in 

the restoration of normal operations 

following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. 

The extension of the comment period 

will allow them, and the public, 

additional time to review the proposed 

rule and to comment on it. Accordingly, 

the Department of the Interior is 

extending the comment period date by 

60 days to end on January 6, 2006. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

Chad Calvert, 

Acting Assistant Secretary—Land and 

Minerals Management. 

[FR Doc. 05–21282 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

32 CFR Part 505 

Privacy Act; Implementation 

AGENCY: Department of the Army 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

is proposing to exempt those records 

contained in A0600–20 DCS, G–1, 

entitled ‘‘Sexual Assault Data 

Management System (SADMS) Files’’

when an exemption has been previously 

claimed for the records in another 

Privacy Act system of records. The 

exemption is intended to preserve the 

exempt status of the record when the 

purposes underlying the exemption for 

the original records are still valid and 

necessary to protect the contents of the 

records. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 27, 2005 to be 

considered by this agency. 

ADDRESSES: Department of the Army, 

Freedom of Information/Privacy 

Division, U.S. Army Records 

Management and Declassification 

Agency, Attn: AHRC–PDD–FPZ, 7701 

Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Suite 

144, Alexandria, VA 22325–3905. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Janice Thornton at (703) 428–6497. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’

It has been determined that Privacy 

Act rules for the Department of Defense 

are not significant rules. The rules do 

not (1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more or 

adversely affect in a material way the 

economy; a sector of the economy; 

productivity; competition; jobs; the 

environment; public health or safety; or 

State, local, or tribal governments or 

communities; (2) Create a serious 

inconsistency or otherwise interfere 

with an action taken or planned by 

another Agency; (3) Materially alter the 

budgetary impact of entitlements, 

grants, user fees, or loan programs, or 

the rights and obligations of recipients 

thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 

issues arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

set forth in this Executive order. 

Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory 

Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) 

It has been determined that Privacy 

Act rules for the Department of Defense 

do not have significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

because they are concerned only with 

the administration of Privacy Act 

systems of records within the 

Department of Defense. 

Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork 

Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) 

It has been determined that Privacy 

Act rules for the Department of Defense 

impose no information requirements 

61590 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

beyond the Department of Defense and 

that the information collected within 

the Department of Defense is necessary 

and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, 

known as the Privacy Act of 1974. 

Section 202, Public Law 104–4, 

‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’

It has been determined that Privacy 

Act rulemaking for the Department of 

Defense does not involve a Federal 

mandate that may result in the 

expenditure by State, local and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more 

and that such rulemaking will not 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. 

Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’

It has been determined that Privacy 

Act rules for the Department of Defense 

do not have federalism implications. 

The rules do not have substantial direct 

effects on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 505 

Privacy. 

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 505 is 

proposed to be amended as follows: 

PART 505—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for 32 CFR 

part 505 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 

U.S.C. 552a). 

2. Section 505.5 is amended by 

adding paragraph (e)(34) as follows: 

§ 505.5 Exemptions. 

(e) * * * 

(34) System identifier and name: 

A0600–20 DCS, G–1, Sexual Assault 

Data Management System (SADMS) 

Files. 

(i) Exemptions: This system of records 

is a compilation of information from 

other Department of Defense and U.S. 

Government systems of records. To the 

extent that copies of exempt records 

from those ‘‘other’’ systems of records 

are entered into this system, OSD 

hereby claims the same exemptions for 

the records from those ‘‘other’’ systems 

that are entered into this system, as 

claimed for the original primary system 

of which they are a part. 

(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), 

(k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), 

and (k)(7). 

(iii) Records are only exempt from 

pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to 

the extent (A) such provisions have 

been identified and an exemption 

claimed for the original record and (B) 

the purpose underlying the exemption 

for the original record still pertain to the 

record which is now contained in this 

system of records. In general, the 

exemptions are claimed in order to 

protect properly classified information 

relating to national defense and foreign 

policy, to avoid interference during the 

conduct of criminal, civil, or 

administrative actions or investigations, 

to ensure protective services provided 

the President and others are not 

compromised, to protect the identity of 

confidential sources incident to Federal 

employment, military service, contract, 

and security clearance determinations, 

and to preserve the confidentiality and 

integrity of Federal evaluation materials. 

The exemption rule for the original 

records will identify the specific reasons 

why the records are exempt from 

specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 05–21113 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[R09–OAR–2005–CA–0005; FRL–7986–9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Ventura County 

Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Ventura County Air 

Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

surface cleaning operations. We are 

proposing to approve local rules to 

regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 

(CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by November 25, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number R09–OAR–

2005–CA–0005, by one of the following 

methods: 

1. Agency Web site: http:// 

docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. EPA prefers 

receiving comments through this 

electronic public docket and comment 

system. Follow the on-line instructions 

to submit comments. 

2. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions. 

3. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

4. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ 

, including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through the 

agency Web site, eRulemaking portal or 

e-mail. The agency Web site and 

eRulemaking portal are ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ systems, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send e-mail 

directly to EPA, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the public comment. 

If EPA cannot read your comment due 

to technical difficulties and cannot 

contact you for clarification, EPA may 

not be able to consider your comment. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub and in 

hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed in the index, some 

information may be publicly available 

only at the hard copy location (e.g., 

copyrighted material), and some may 

not be publicly available in either 

location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard 

copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: VCAPCD Rules 74.6, 74.6.1, 

74.12, 74.13, 74.19, 74.19.1, 74.24, and 

74.30. In the Rules and Regulations 

section of this Federal Register, we are 

approving these local rules in a direct 

final action without prior proposal 

because we believe these SIP revisions 

are not controversial. If we receive 

adverse comments, however, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the