alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dex Media,
Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 12, 2004
    /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5077 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5077

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
   minimum tax exemption amount and index such amount for inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2010

   Mr. Hall of New York (for himself, Mr. Holt, Mr. Peters, and Mrs. 
   Maloney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
   minimum tax exemption amount and index such amount for inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT INCREASED ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMPTION AMOUNT 
              INDEXED FOR INFLATION.

    (a) Increase.--Paragraph (1) of section 55(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$45,000 ($70,950 in the case of taxable 
        years beginning in 2009)'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``$100,000'', and
            (2) by striking ``$33,750 ($46,700 in the case of taxable 
        years beginning in 2006)'' in subparagraph (B) and inserting 
        ``$75,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Subsection (d) of section 55 of such 
Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning after 2010, the dollar amounts in subparagraphs 
        (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall each be increased by an 
        amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2009' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.
        If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence is not a 
        multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the next 
        lowest multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Renewable Assets, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2005, I, Alfred M.
Schiffrin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Renewable Assets, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Renewable Assets, Inc.

                                    /s/ ALFRED M. SCHIFFRIN
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                    Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer


         September 14, 2005

                                     - 13 -
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mount Vernon United Methodist Church v. Harris County, Texas, et al

Appellate case number: 01-18-01114-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-29708

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s motion en banc reconsideration is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3. Any 

pending matters are dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court

En banc panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, and Countiss.

Date: __February 20, 2020____
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00087-CV

JONAH WARD APPELLANT

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On August 6, 2012, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of 

appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 

filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $175 

filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 6, 2012

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil 

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing 

fees in courts of appeals).
Exhibit 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of ATEL Cash  Distribution
Fund VIII, LLC;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
     those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of December 31, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:        6/1/2004

 /s/ Dean Cash
-----------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of Managing Member
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.3



To the Board of Directors
Bull Run Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-91296, 33-91298 and 333-56125) on Form S-8 of Bull Run Corporation and
in the Registration Statement (No. 333-84833) on Form S-4 of BR Holding, Inc. of
our report dated February 10, 1997 with respect to the statements of earnings,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Capital Sports Properties,
Inc. for the six-months ended June 30, 1996, which report appears in the June
30, 1999 transition report on Form 10-K of Bull Run Corporation.



                                            /s/  KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
November 8, 1999
#### Chuck HING LEE, Appellant in No. 71-1243, et al., and Fung Kiam Lee, individually and as husband and wife, v. Ronald P. GRAY. Appeal of Fung KIAM LEE, No. 71-1244.

Nos. 71-1243, 71-1244.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) Feb. 17, 1972.

Decided March 9, 1972.

Michael A. Kaplan, Camden, N. J. (Plone, Tomar, Parks & Seliger, Camden, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.

David G. Eynon, Haddonfield, N. J. (Farrell, Eynon & Munyon, A Professional Corp., Haddonfield, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before ADAMS, GIBBONS and JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In this diversity automobile accident case the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. Both cars were travelling northbound on the New Jersey Turnpike in a rainstorm when the defendant’s vehicle skidded from the right lane into the center lane and stopped. After the defendant’s car stopped it was struck by plaintiffs’ car. Plaintiffs established a prima facie case of negligence by virtue of the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur. See*Vespe v. DiMarco, 43 N.J. 430, 204 A.2d 874 (1964); Mockler v. Russman, 102 N.J. Super. 582, 246 A.2d 478 (App.Div. 1968). Defendant testified, however, that he lost control of his car when the front end started to shake violently so that it was difficult for him to maintain control over the steering mechanism. This evidence that the skid was the result of a mechanical defect apparently was accepted by the jury. The defendant also testified that on one prior occasion he had a similar mechanical problem with the same car, and that he had repairs made. To corroborate the fact that such repairs were made he offered the repair bill in evidence. On this appeal plaintiffs contend that the court erred in submitting to the jury the defense of mechanical defect, because no competent evidence supported that theory. The defendant was competent to testify that the car acted in a given *1277manner and about his attempts to control it. Accepting that testimony the inevitable conclusion is that the difficulty was mechanical. Expert opinion testimony was not a prerequisite. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 43; Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487, 178 A.2d 161 (1962); Allen v. Matson Navigation Co., 255 F.2d 273 (9th Cir. 1958); Proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts and Magistrates, 7-01 (Preliminary Draft 1969). Plaintiffs also contend that the court erred in admitting the repair bill in evidence. It was admitted solely to corroborate the defendant’s testimony that he had the ear repaired after a prior incident. For this purpose its use was proper. Plaintiffs also contend that the district court should have granted a new trial because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The record discloses that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying that motion.

The judgment will be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research #1203.                    

*Dates and Times:*                         November 3, 2005; 7:45 a.m.-6:30 p.m. (open 7:45-12:30, 1:30-5/closed 5-6:30). November 4, 2005; 8 a.m.-2:30 p.m. (closed).                    

*Place:*                         Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Ulrich Strom, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4938.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning progress of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials.                    

*Agenda:*                         November 3, 2005—Open for Directors overview of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials.                    

November 4, 2005—Closed to review and evaluate progress of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials.

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 8, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-21070 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit 23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




The
      Board
      of Directors


Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc.




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      and
      Form SB-2 (No. 333-136143) of Crystal International Travel Group, Inc.
      of our report dated November 10, 2006, with respect to the balance sheets of
      Crystal International Travel Group, Inc. as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and
      the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive
      income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears
      in
      the July 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Crystal International
      Travel Group, Inc.


/s/
                Scharf Pera & Co., PLLCScharf
                Pera & Co., PLLC




Charlotte,
      North Carolina


July
      2,
      2007.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2010 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                      
|                   |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  | (Chief Accounting Officer)            

A signed original of this
written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), KarenMagee, the Chief Executive Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:           1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and           2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 8th day of November2007.       /s/ KAREN MAGEE         Karen Magee
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000032 18-APR-2011 08:36 AM SCAD-11-0000032
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. FRANK M. FERNANDEZ, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 07-172-8632, 08-004-8647, 09-016-8739, 09-017-8740, 09-084-8807, 09-085-8808, 09-087-8810, 09-088-8811, 09-089-8812, 09-090-8813, 10-019-8853, 10-020-8854, 10-021-8855, 10-022-8856, 10-023-8857, 10-024-8858, 10-040-8874, 10-056-8890, 10-090-8924, 11-003-8927, 11-004-8928)
ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama and Duffy, JJ., Circuit Judge Chang in place of Acoba, J., recused and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura, recused) Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s petition for the interim suspension of Respondent Frank M. Fernandez from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 2.23 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i (RSCH), Respondent Fernandez’s memorandum in response to our order to show cause, and the record, it appears Petitioner has presented “sufficient evidence demonstrating that an attorney has committed a violation of the Hawai ' i Rules of Professional Conduct and poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public” and Respondent Fernandez has failed to show good cause as to why his license to practice law in this jurisdiction should not beimmediately suspended pending the outcome of disciplinary proceedings. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Fernandez is suspended, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.23(a)(3), pending the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings and until further order of this court. This order is effective upon entry. In view of the fact that some pending complaints date back to 2006, it is the court’s expectation that the investigation will be completed as expeditiously as possible. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order imposing interim suspension on Respondent Fernandez shall constitute a suspension of Respondent Fernandez for purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16, and Respondent Fernandez shall comply with the requirements of that rule. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to all judges. Distribution may be by electronic mail. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, April 18, 2011.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Gary W.B. Chang /s/ Glenn J. Kim

2
Exhibit 12.1
 PlanetOut Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands, except ratios)
 Nine monthsendedYear ended December 31,
    
    
    September 30,2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008Net income (loss)
from
operations as
reported
    
    $
    (423
    )
    
    $
    449
    
    
    $
    2,043
    
    
    $
    (1,248
    )
    
    $
    (41,528
    )
    
    $
    (4,726
    )Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    193
    
    
    
    1,713
    
    
    
    238
    
    
    
    1,216
    
    
    
    2,270
    
    
    
    109Earnings as defined
    
    $
    (230
    )
    
    $
    2,162
    
    
    $
    2,281
    
    
    $
    (32
    )
    
    $
    (39,258
    )
    
    $
    (4,617
    )Fixed charges
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    1,713
    
    
    $
    238
    
    
    $
    1,216
    
    
    $
    2,270
    
    
    $
    109Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    9.6
    x
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing income
(loss) from operations plus fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed
charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt issuance
costs and that portion of rental payments under operating leases that
we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges in 2003, 2006, 2007 and the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 by amounts equal to the net loss for
the period.