alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

*Summary:*                     The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by Pub. L. 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed to support the expansion of the Bank's financial commitments in Sub-Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee and insurance programs of the Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with Sub-Saharan Africa.                

*Time and Place:*                     November 16, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                

*Agenda:*                     The meeting will include introduction of the 2006 Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Board members; update on AGOA; discussions of the 2005 SAAC recommendations; an update on the FY05 business development efforts in the region; and report on 2006 International Business Development strategies; and new business.                

*Public Participation:*                     The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to November 16, 2005, Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3525 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information contact Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3525.                

Kamil Cook, 

Deputy General Counsel (Acting).

[FR Doc. 05-20951 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5204]

The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC). The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Department on matters related to telecommunication and information policy matters in preparation for international meetings pertaining to telecommunication and information issues.

The ITAC will meet to discuss the matters related to the second phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), in preparation for the WSIS Summit in mid-November. The meeting will take place on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. in the auditorium of the Historic National Academy of Science Building. The National Academy of Sciences is located at 2100 C St. NW., Washington, DC.

                    Members of the public are welcome to participate and may join in the discussions, subject to the discretion of the Chair. Persons planning to attend this meeting should send the following data by fax to (202) 647-5957 or e-mail to                     *jillsonad@state.gov*                     not later than 24 hours before the meeting: (1) Name of the meeting, (2) your name, and (3) organizational affiliation. A valid photo ID must be presented to gain entrance to the National Academy of Sciences Building. Directions to the meeting location may be obtained by calling the ITAC Secretariat at (202) 647-5205.                

Dated: October 6, 2005.

Anne Jillson,

Foreign Affairs Officer, International Communications and Information Policy, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 05-20550 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

Section Certifications

EX-31.1 SECTION 302CERTIFICATION OF CEO

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph L. Billhimer, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Premier Entertainment Biloxi LLC;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e» for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2004

 

 
| /s/     Joseph  L. Billhimer |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph  L. Billhimer                                  |   |
| Chief  Operating Officer                              |   |

 

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**562 KA 14-00525**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEROY SAVAGE SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered May 20, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (§ 265.01 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for substitution of counsel inasmuch as “defendant failed to proffer specific allegations of a ‘seemingly serious request’ that would require the court to engage in a minimal inquiry” ( People v Porto , 16 NY3d 93, 100; see People v Wilson , 112 AD3d 1317, 1318, lv denied 23 NY3d 1069; People v Woods , 110 AD3d 748, 748, lv denied 23 NY3d 969). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### CELTIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Barry R. BROWN and Kimberly Brown. E. Graham Stokes v. Barry R. Brown and Kimberly Brown.

1011007 and 1011237.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 1, 2002.

Rehearing Applications Denied Dec. 20, 2002.

Robert S.W. Given, F.A. Flowers III, and Harlan F. Winn III of Burr & For-man, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellant Celtic Life Insurance Company.

Barry A. Brock and J. David Moore of Walston, Wells, Anderson & Bains, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellant E. Graham Stokes.

Ted L. Mann and Robert Potter of Mann, Cowan *&*Potter, P.C., Birmingham, for appellees.

HOUSTON, Justice.

The sole issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Barbour Circuit Court erred when it denied the appellants’ motions to compel arbitration on the basis that the relevant arbitration agreement bars the arbitrator from awarding punitive damages (although the right to enforce this provision was waived) and contains no severability clause. The initial briefs in this case were filed before the release of our decision in *Ex parte Celtic Life Insurance Co.,*834 So.2d 766 (Ala.2002), which involved the same arbitration agreement and the same issue, and which is therefore dispositive of these appeals. In accordance with *Ex parte Celtic Life Insurance Co.,*we reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellants’ motions to compel arbitration and remand the cases for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

MOORE, C.J., dissents.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

t0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144744 

ELLEANE RAJI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 144744 

 COA: 307678 

Genesee CC: 06-083780-CZ 

GENESEE COUNTY LAND BANK and 

GENESEE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

**.      **

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                             | TNT                DESIGNS, INC.                                                                             |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                                                                                         |   |
| Date:                May                15, 2008 | By:                                                                                                          | /s/                Anju Tandon |
|                                             | Anju                Tandon                                                                                   |
|                                             | President                and Chief Executive                                                                 |
|                                             | Officer                & Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting                Officer) |

----
#### Real Estate Guarantee and Investment Company of Delaware (formerly Sussex Land and Cattle Company) *v.*Edward Dudley, Heulings Lippincott and Francis H. Hoffecker, Appellants.

Argued May 15, 1899.

Appeal, No. 195, Jan. T., 1898, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket No. 3, page 141, on bill' in equity.

Before Gbeen, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Reversed.

October 6, 1899:

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

This issue, except in the name of parties plaintiff, is precisely the same as that of Mary E. Sutton against the same defendants, in which decree has this day been handed down, ante, p. 194. For the reasons accompanying that decree, this one is reversed at the costs of the appellee, the injunction dissolved and the bill dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 24, 2005, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. A permit was issued on October 12, 2005 to: 
Shane B. Kanatous, Permit No. 2006-015.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20862 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the November 10, 2005 regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) has been rescheduled. The regular meeting of the Board will be                               ( print page 60523)                            held Tuesday, November 8, 2004 starting at 9 a.m. An agenda for this meeting will be published at a later date.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

Dated: October 14, 2005. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 05-20957 Filed 10-14-05; 3:59 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7548

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT FULTON ROOD, IV,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00052-CMH-1; 1:14-cv-01144-CMH)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Fulton Rood, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Uzo Enyinnaya Asonye, 

Michael Edward Rich, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Christopher John Catizone, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Fulton Rood, IV, seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate 

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Rood has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of 

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      32





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rancher Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for
      the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, John Works, Chief
      Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer of Rancher Energy, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Rancher Energy.









/s/
              John WorksName:
            John
                WorksTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                14, 2006
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of White Mountain Titanium Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      May
      14, 2008





*/**s/*Charles E. JenkinsCharles
                E. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)