alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clara Goldstein Levin, Plaintiff, *v.*Emil Charles Levin and Others, Executors, etc., of Sigmund Levin, Deceased, Defendants.*

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

February 18, 1936.

*B. Leo Schwarz [Gustave B. Garfield, Maurice V. Seligson*and *MaxL. Kane*of counsel], for the plaintiff.

*Emil Levin [Herman A. Gray*of counsel], for the defendants.

*

See, also, 157 Misc. 156; Id. 372.

*231Close, J.

The defendants’ notice of motion is based upon the pleadings, the demand for the bill of particulars and the bills of particulars furnished. Consequently, they are not limited to the bare allegations of the complaint. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 476; Rules Civ. Prac. rule 112; *Russell*v. *Societe Anonyme, etc.,*268 N. Y. 173.) This being true, it is clear that the consideration for the alleged contract is indivisible. There is only one contract, viz., a contract to enter into a marriage that would concededly be void, as one of the parties was already legally married to another. There was no separate contract for society and companionship. Assuming this to be true, such a contract would under the circumstances here, be against public policy and, therefore, void. It is not necessary to spread the facts involved upon the record. The plaintiff’s position is untenable. Motion is granted.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 I,      Daniel      P. Foley, Chief Financial Officer of Rancher Energy Corp. (the Company),      certify, that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United      States Code:

|   | (1)    | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended                June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the                date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of                the                dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report.                                                                                                               |

| /s/                Daniel P. Foley     |
|----------------------------------------|
| Daniel                P. Foley         |
| Chief                Financial Officer |
| August                8, 2007          |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                 |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Mark Buller
|                      |  |                 |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of China Architectural Engineering, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Luo Ken YiLuo
      Ken YiChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      14, 2009/s/ Li ChengchengLi
      ChengchengChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to China Architectural Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by China
Architectural Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr.,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
                (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Curtis L. Garner, Jr.





Curtis
      L.
      Garner, Jr.


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      6, 2006
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 
 Summary of Executive Officer Compensation 
 The following executive
officers of ABIOMED, Inc. are at will employees of ABIOMED, Inc. and have not entered into a formal employment agreement with ABIOMED, Inc. The current understanding between each employee and ABIOMED, Inc. with respect to the employee’s
compensation is as follows: 
  

									
	 Name
	  	Base Salary	 	  	Target
Fiscal 2014
Bonus
(Percentage
of Salary)	 
	 William J. Bolt
	  	$	285,985	  	  	 	60	% 
	 Andrew J. Greenfield
	  	$	256,356	  	  	 	55	% 
	 Michael G. Howley
	  	$	300,682	  	  	 	65	% 

 These officers are also eligible to receive grants of stock options and other awards at the discretion of
ABIOMED’s Compensation Committee. 
 We have an employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Michael R. Minogue,
which sets forth the terms of his employment. Mr. Minogue’s current salary is $522,210 and his target bonus for fiscal 2014 is 120% of salary. We have an offer letter with our Chief Financial Officer, Robert L. Bowen, which sets forth the
terms of his employment. Mr. Bowen’s current salary is $316,982 and his target bonus for fiscal 2014 is 60% of salary. We also have an offer letter with our Chief Operating Officer, David M. Weber, which sets forth the terms of his
employment. Mr. Weber’s current salary is $343,511 and his target bonus for fiscal 2014 is 70% of salary.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5020 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5020

  To require the Federal Communications Commission to extend the time 
 period for filing petitions to deny, oppositions, and comments in the 
     proceeding relating to the proposed merger of Comcast and NBC 
                               Universal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2010

 Ms. Waters (for herself, Ms. Speier, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Richardson, Ms. 
 Watson, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Ms. Clarke, Mr. 
 Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. 
Watt, Mr. Payne, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Conyers, 
Ms. Fudge, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Frank of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Towns, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Pierluisi, Mr. Reyes, Mr. 
 Honda, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Moran of 
Virginia, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, 
    Ms. Edwards of Maryland, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Moore of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Doggett, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Farr, Mr. Clay, Mr. Hastings 
 of Florida, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
 Capuano, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Filner, Mr. Delahunt, Mrs. Napolitano, and 
Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Federal Communications Commission to extend the time 
 period for filing petitions to deny, oppositions, and comments in the 
     proceeding relating to the proposed merger of Comcast and NBC 
                               Universal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FCC REQUIRED TO EXTEND COMMENT PERIOD.

    The Federal Communications Commission shall extend for 45 days the 
time period for filing petitions to deny, oppositions, and comments in 
the proceeding relating to the proposed merger of Comcast and NBC 
Universal entitled ``Applications of Comcast Corporation, General 
Electric Company, and NBC Universal, Inc., to Assign and Transfer 
Control of FCC Licenses'' (Docket 10-56). Such extension shall--
            (1) permit petitions to deny, oppositions, and comments on 
        or before June 17, 2010;
            (2) permit responses to petitions to deny, oppositions, and 
        comments on or before July, 16, 2010; and
            (3) permit replies to such responses on or before August 1, 
        2010.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 13, 2011







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31992R2146

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2146/92 of 29 July 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90***Official Journal L 214 , 30/07/1992 P. 0023 - 0023*

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2146/92  of 29 July 1992  amending Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 

 Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, 

 Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90 of 24 July 1990 laying down additional general rules on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products as regards cheese (1), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 1 and  the second subparagraph of Article 3 (3) thereof, 

 Whereas Article 4 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 (2), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 837/91 (3), fixes the sum due for quantities of casein and/or caseinates used without authorization having regard to the prices for casein and  caseinates recorded on the markets in the fourth quarter of 1990; whereas the upward trend in those prices during the first half of 1992 requires that sum to be reduced; 

 Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, 

 HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:  

Article 1 

 Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 is hereby replaced by the following: 

 '1. The sum due in accordance with Article 3 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90 shall be ECU 240 per 100 kilograms of casein and/or caseinates, having regard to the price for casein and caseinates recorded on the markets in the first half of 1992.'  

Article 2 

 This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. 

 Done at Brussels, 29 July 1992. For the Commission 

 Ray MAC SHARRY 

 Member of the Commission   

(1) OJ No L 201, 31. 7. 1990, p. 7. (2) OJ No L 264, 27. 9. 1990, p. 20. (3) OJ No L 85, 5. 4. 1991, p. 15.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60487-60488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today 
terminated the certification of petitions for trade adjustment 
assistance (TAA) that was filed by salmon producers in Alaska and 
Washington. Salmon producers in these states are no longer eligible for 
TAA benefits in fiscal year 2006.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon investigation, the Administrator 
determined that the average salmon prices during the 2004 marketing 
year was $0.343/pound, which is 85 percent of the base 5-year average 
price. During that same marketing year, imports declined by 1.4 
percent. Therefore, the average price for the most recent marketing 
year was not less than 80 percent of the average price for the base 
period and imports were no longer

[[Page 60488]]

contributing factors for program eligibility.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4034322124256e21242a3533342d252e34002621336e353324216e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2a6a0b3b6b7fcb3b6b8a7a1a6bfb7bca692b4b3a1fca7a1b6b3fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
A. Ellen Terpstra,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20836 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ARLIN GEORGE

No. 7412SC872

(Filed 5 February 1975)

1. Criminal Law § 92— consolidation of charges for trial

The trial court did not err in consolidating for trial charges against defendant for four offenses of felonious breaking and entering and four offenses of felonious larceny which allegedly occurred on two separate dates.

2. Burglary and Unlawful Breakings § 5; Larceny § 7 — breaking and entering — larceny — sufficiency of evidence

The State’s evidence was sufficient for the jury on three charges of felonious breaking and entering and three charges of felonious larceny but was insufficient for the jury on a fourth charge of each crime.

ON *certiorari*to review judgments of *Braswell, Judge,*entered at the 10 June 1974 Criminal Session of Superior Court held in Cumberland County.

By indictments, proper in form, defendant was charged with four offenses of felonious breaking or entering and four offenses of felonious larceny. Six of the offenses allegedly occurred on 4 January 1974 and the other two on 9 January 1974. Over defendant’s objection and on motion of the State, the cases were consolidated for trial. Defendant pleaded not guilty to all charges.

A jury found defendant guilty as charged and the court entered judgments imposing prison sentences under the Youthful Offender Statute (G.S. 148-49.2) for the following terms: In no. 74-CR-4083, 10 years; in no. 74-CR-4084, two years, to begin at expiration of sentence imposed in 74-CR-4083; in no. *58274-CR-4085, two years, to begin at expiration of sentence imposed in no. 74-CR-4084; and in no. 74-CR-4086, 10 years, to run concurrently with sentence imposed in no. 74-CR-4088.

Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten, by Associate Attorneys Robert P. Gruber and Jesse C. Brake, for the State.*

*Rose, Thorp and Rand, by Anthony E. Rand, and Cherry and Grimes, by Sol G. Cherry, for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

[1] Defendant contends the trial court erred in consolidating the cases for trial. This contention has no merit. Allowance of the State’s motion to consolidate the cases was within the discretion of the trial judge, *State v. Anderson,*281 N.C. 261, 188 S.E. 2d 336 (1972), and no abuse of discretion is shown.

[2] Defendant contends the trial court erred in overruling his motions to nonsuit all charges. We have carefully reviewed the evidence and conclude that it was sufficient to withstand the motions for nonsuit on all charges except charges alleged in no. 74-CR-4085; we hold that the evidence in that case was insufficient and the motions for nonsuit as to it should have been allowed.

In nos. 74-CR-4083, 74-CR-4084, and 74-CR-4086, no error.

In no. 74-CR-4085, reversed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Clark concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                      
|                        |  |  |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |  |  | (Chief Accounting Officer)            

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                         OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
<S>                                             <C>
Applied Telecom, Inc.                           Delaware
Brooktree Corporation                           California
Brooktree Worldwide Sales Corporation           California
Conexant Systems, Inc.                          Nevada
Conexant Systems Worldwide, Inc.                Delaware
Conexant Spinco, Inc.                           Delaware
DeviceGuys, Inc.                                Washington
HotRail, Inc.                                   California
Istari Design, Inc.                             California
Maker Communications, Inc.                      Delaware
NetPlane Systems, Inc.                          Massachusetts
Sierra Imaging, Inc.                            California
Brooktree International Ltd.                    Cayman Islands
Brooktree Technologies Ltd.                     Cayman Islands
Conexant Digital Infotainment Limited           United Kingdom
Conexant Foreign Sales Corporation              Barbados
Conexant Systems Asia Pacific Ltd.              Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
Conexant Systems France S.A.S.                  France
Conexant Systems Germany G.m.b.H.               Germany
Conexant Systems Holdings Limited               United Kingdom
Conexant Systems Iceland Ehf. (Ltd.)            Iceland
Conexant Systems Israel (1996) Ltd.             Israel
Conexant Systems Israel Commercial Ltd.         Israel
Conexant Systems Japan Company Ltd.             Japan
Conexant Systems Korea Ltd.                     Korea
Conexant Systems S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
Conexant Systems Scandinavia AB                 Sweden
Conexant Systems Singapore Pte. Limited         Singapore
Conexant Systems Taiwan Co., Ltd.               Taiwan
Conexant Systems UK Limited                     United Kingdom
Microcosm Communications Limited                United Kingdom
Novanet Semiconductor Ltd.                      Israel
Philsar Semiconductor Inc.                      Canada
</TABLE>