alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Minor Boundary Revision at Fort Moultrie Unit of Fort Sumter 
National Monument

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of park boundary revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the boundary of the Fort Moultrie Unit of 
Fort Sumter National Monument has been revised pursuant to the Acts 
specified below to encompass lands depicted on drawing 392/92,002A of 
Fort Sumter National Monument (which includes Fort Moultrie) prepared 
by the National Park Service. The revision to the boundary includes 
tract 01-109, as depicted on the map.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent; Fort Sumter National 
Monument; 1214 Middle Street; Sullivan's Island, South Carolina 29482

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Joint Resolution of April 28, 1948, 
(Pub. L. 80-504, 62 Stat. 204) authorized the establishment of Fort 
Sumter National Monument. Fort Moultrie was acquired under authority of 
the 1935 Historic Sites Act (45 Stat 666, 16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). 
Sections 7(c)(i) and 7(c)(ii) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund 
Act, as amended by the Act of June 10, 1977 (Pub. L. 95-42, 91 Stat. 
210), and the Act of March 10, 1980 (Pub. L. 103-333, 110 Stat. 4194), 
further authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make minor 
revisions in the boundaries whenever the Secretary determines that it 
is necessary for the preservation, protection, interpretation or 
management of an area.
    The map is on file and available for inspection in the Land 
Resources Program Center, Southeast Regional Office, 100 Alabama 
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, and in the Offices of the National 
Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20013-7127.

    Dated: August 19, 2005.
Patricia A. Hooks,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 05-20918 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY





 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints David Chen and Ronald Gorthuis, jointly and
severally, as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for
him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form
10-QKSB and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his
substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Form 10-QSB has
been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:

       Signature                           Title                        Date
       ---------                           -----                        ----

     /s/ David Chen
 ______________________
       David Chen          Chief Executive Officer and Director     May 15, 2006

  /s/ Ronald Gorthuis
 _____________________
    Ronald Gorthuis               Chief Financial Officer           May 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,713
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          4,839
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                3,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    67,741
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         85,941
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           85,676
<LOANS>                                       168,392
<ALLOWANCE>                                       924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                276,846
<DEPOSITS>                                    201,937
<SHORT-TERM>                                    5,650
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             1,616
<LONG-TERM>                                    43,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          318
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                276,846
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,935
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               5,668
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                1,159
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               16,762
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              8,844
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,289
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           5,473
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     102
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,068)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 4,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      309
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.36
<LOANS-NON>                                       133
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  822
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 924
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1607-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated September 24, 2005, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 7, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2005:

    Evangeline, Sabine, St. Landry, and Vernon Parishes for Public 
Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual 
Assistance and debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance program, including 
direct Federal assistance.)
    De Soto, Natchitoches, and Rapides Parishes for Public 
Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated for debris removal 
and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the 
Public Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-20773 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
exhibit 10.26 Amend to Purchase AA between Point West Capital & Kildare




AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT



                   
This AMENDMENT TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of March
26, 2002, is by and among Point West Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Seller") and Kildare Capital, Inc., a California corporation
("Purchaser"), regarding the sale and purchase of one hundred percent (100%) of
the equity ownership of Point West Securities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(the "Company").


                   
A. WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of all the member interests ("Interests") of the
Company;


                   
B. WHEREAS, the Company is a broker-dealer registered with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is in good standing with
the National Association of Securities Dealers as a member thereof and is authorized to
conduct business as a broker-dealer; and


                   
C. WHEREAS, Seller wishes to sell, and Purchaser wishes to purchase, the Interests on the
terms and conditions set forth below.


                   
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set
forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties do
mutually covenant and agree as follows:


                   
1.1 Purchaser agrees to surrender all termination rights which were granted in Article
7 Section (b) Subsection (i) on the Purchase Agreement dates 12/31/01. Termination would
only occur under this subsection if the NASD or another Regulatory Body rejects the
application for Kildare Capital.



                   
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Purchase Agreement as of
the date first written above.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Lowell R. Selvin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PlanetOut Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 11, 2005     /s/ Lowell R Selvin     Lowell R Selvin
#### William Eugene BEARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-1747.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 23, 1972.

William Eugene Beard, in pro. per.

Charles H. Anderson, U. S. Atty., Fred D. Thompson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for appellee on brief.

Before McCREE and KENT, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We consider an appeal from the denial of a writ of error coram nobis. See United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed 248 (1954). Appellant is currently incarcerated in a penal institution of the State of Tennessee, but he is subject to concurrent federal sentences of 5, 10, and 50 years imposed after his convictions of conspiracy, receiving and concealing proceeds of bank robberies, and murder. The petition points out that appellant’s defense attorney had conflicting interests because he represented one of appellant’s co-indictees, John W. Lee-man, who testified for the government at appellant’s trial.

The District Court reviewed the trial record, which reveals that the issues presented by this petition were fully explored at trial, and found no prejudice. We have considered the record and the opinion of this court in United States v. Etheridge, 424 F.2d 951 (6th Cir. 1970), and we determine that the District Court’s holding that there was no denial of the effective assistance of counsel is correct. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Marion Seymour Cosgrove, Petitioner, for a Mandamus Order against Walter E. Smith, as Mayor, and Joseph M. Hughes and Others, as Trustees Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Williston Park, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Nassau County,

May 19, 1936.

*Albert H. Levine,*for the petitioner.

*Joseph M. Crooks,*for the respondents.

Hooley, J.

This is an appheation for a peremptory mandamus order against the board of trustees of the village of Williston Park to compel said board to submit to the electors of said village at a special election a proposition for the establishment of a lighting system and power plant. Section 56 of the Village Law provides in part: *“*The board of trustees may, upon its own motion and shah, upon the petition of * * * one hundred electors in a village of the first class qualified to vote upon a proposition, cause to be submitted at a village election a proposition upon any of the following questions * * * to estabhsh or acquire a lighting system * * *. Upon the presentation of such petition the board of trustees shall cause *the proposition*to be submitted accordingly.” (Italics mine.)

*584It is the clear intent of the Village Law that a board of trustees may upon its own motion submit a proposition, or a specified number of taxpayers may sign a petition for the submission of a proposition and compel the board of trustees to hold an election thereon. It is equally clear, however, that in the latter case the proposition must be complete in and of itself and require nothing further from the board of trustees than the mere ministerial act of calling an election thereon.

It is obvious from a reading of the petition herein that the proposed proposition is incomplete and indefinite and requires that certain data with respect to the availability of WPA or PWA moneys be obtained before said proposition may properly be submitted to the voters.

It may well be that when a petition is filed such as the one in the case at bar, the board of trustees may gather the necessary information and data and formulate an appropriate proposition. That action would be the equivalent of submitting the proposition on the motion of the board itself. However, the board is not required to do anything in connection with the petition as filed. Mandamus may not be invoked to compel public officials to perform acts involving discretion. Application denied.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

East West Bank


100
%East West Capital Trust I


100
%East West Capital Trust II


100
%East West Capital Statutory Trust III


100
%East West Capital Trust IV


100
%East West Capital Trust V


100
%East West Capital Trust VI


100
%East West Capital Trust VII


100
%East West Capital Trust VIII


100
%East West Capital Trust IX


100
%East West Insurance Services, Inc.


100
%East West Leasing (1)


100
%American International Bancorp, Inc. (1)


100
%United National Bancorp, Inc. (1)


100
%


(1)Not
currently active


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 10-p-2**     **Schedule identifying agreements substantially identicalto the form of Indemnity Agreement constitutingExhibit 10-p-1 hereto entered into by Conexant Systems,Inc. and each of the following persons**   Name   Donald R. BeallSteven J. BilodeauDipanjan DebDwight W. DeckerF. Craig FarrillArmando GedayBalakrishnan S. IyerJohn W. MarrenD. Scott MercerJerre L. SteadGiuseppe ZoccoJ. Scott BlouinJasmina T. BoulangerLewis C. BrewsterDennis E. O’ReillyKerry K. PetryF. Matthew RhodesMichael J. Rispoli
101
Exhibit
10.17 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 March 16,
2005
 
 
 ViewSonic
Corporation
 381 Brea
Canyon Road
 Walnut,
CA 91789
 
 
 Re:
    The
      Fee Agreement (“Fee Agreement”) between ViewSonic Corporation and The CIT
      Group/Business Credit, Inc. (Agent).
 
 Gentleman:
 
 Reference
is made to that certain Fee Agreement dated December 18, 2001 between you and
Agent in reference to that certain Financing Agreement also dated as of December
18, 2001.
 
 This will
confirm our agreement that upon execution of that certain Second Amendment
(“Second Amendment”) to Financing Agreement between you and Agent of even date
and upon satisfaction of the conditions thereto set forth in Section 5 of the
Second Amendment, the Administrative Management Fee set forth in the third
paragraph of Fee Agreement shall no longer be charged and shall be of no further
force or effect. In all other respects, the Fee Agreement shall remain
effective.
 
 Very
truly yours,
 
 The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc.
 
 
 By: /s/
Steven
Ogus
 
 Title:Vice
President
 
 Agreed:
 
 ViewSonic
Corporation
 
 
 
 By:/s/ James
A.
Morlan
 James A.
Morlan
 
 Title: CFO
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




1.
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Michael D. WeaverMichael
      D. WeaverChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      8, 2010
#### STATE ex rel. Emanuel ISAAC v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2219.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Isaac, Emanuel;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 382-227; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-1255.

Denied.
First Amend. to Employment Agt









EXHIBIT 10.4




 




THIRD

AMENDMENT TO




1990 PERFORMANCE EQUITY PLAN




 




THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to

the 1990 Performance Equity Plan of CTN Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”),

a Delaware corporation formerly known as College Television Network, Inc.,

(this “Amendment”) is made effective as of the 6th day of

June, 2000 (the “Effective Date”). 

All capitalized terms in this Amendment have the meaning ascribed to

such terms in the Performance Equity Plan (the “Plan”), unless otherwise

stated herein.




W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:




WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan to

change the name of the Company as it is referred to in the Plan.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises

contained herein, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:




1.             All references in the Plan to “College Television

Network, Inc.” are deleted, and the name “CTN Media Group, Inc.” is substituted

therefor in each instance.




2.             Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the

Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the

Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.




 




                                                                                                CTN Media Group, Inc.




 




 




	

  By:


  	

  /s/ Jason Elkin


  
	

   


  	

  Jason Elkin


  
	

   


  	

  Chief Executive

  Officer


  





ATTEST:




 




 




	

  By:


  	

  /s/ Patrick Doran


  
	

   


  	

  Patrick Doran, Secretary