Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices 61491 

DATES: Persons wishing to file 

objections should do so no later than 

October 31, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to 

objections should be filed in Docket 

OST–2005–20405 and addressed to U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, (M–30, Room PL–401), 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590, and should be served upon the 

parties listed in Attachment A to the 

order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vanessa R. Balgobin, Air Carrier Fitness 

Division (X–56, Room 6401), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590, (202) 366–9721. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

Michael W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05–21200 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Change Notice for RTCA Program 

Management Committee 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Program 

Management Committee meeting. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice 

to advise the public of a meeting of the 

RTCA Program Management Committee. 

DATES: The meeting will be held 

November 8, 2005 starting at 9 a.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 

805, Washington, DC 20036. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 

Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; 

telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202) 

833–9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–

463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 

hereby given for a Program Management 

Committee meeting. The revised agenda 

will include: 

• November 8: 

• Opening Session (Welcome and 

Introductory Remarks, Review/ 

Approve Summary of Previous 

Meeting) 

• Publication Consideration/Approval: 

• Final Draft, Revised DO–281, 

Minimum Operational Performance 

Standards for Aircraft VDL Mode 2 

Physical, Link and Network Layer, 

RTCA Paper No. 198–05/PMC–413, 

prepared by SC–172. 

• Final Draft, Revised DO–271B, 

Minimum Operational Performance 

Standards for Aircraft VDL Mode 3 

Transceiver Operating in the 

Frequency Range 117.975–137.000 

MHz, RTCA Paper No. 159–05/ 

PMC–404, prepared by SC–172. 

• Final Draft, Revised DO–186A, 

Minimum Operational Performance 

Standards for Airborne Radio 

Communications Equipment, RTCA 

Paper No. 160–05/PMC–405, 

prepared by SC–172. 

• Final Draft, Integrated Modular 

Avionics (IMA) Development 

Guidance and Certification 

Considerations, RTCA Paper No. 

131–05/PMC–402, prepared by SC–

200. 

• Final Draft, Safety Analysis of 

Proposed Change to TCAS RA 

Reversal Logic, RTCA Paper No. 

199–05/PMC–414, prepared by SC–

147. 

• Discussion: 

• SC–147—Traffic Alert and Collision 

Avoidance System. 

• Discussion dependent on Agenda 

Item 3E results. 

• Review/Approve revised Terms of 

Reference for additional work to 

revise DO–185A, Minimum 

Operational Performance Standards 

for Traffic Alert and Collision 

Avoidance System II (TCAS II) 

Airborne Equipment. 

• SC–203—Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems. 

• Review Committee Status. 

• Review/Approve revised Terms of 

Reference. 

• SC–206—Aeronautical Information 

Services (AIS) Data Link. 

• Review Committee Status. 

• Review/Approve revised Terms of 

Reference. 

• Cabin Management Systems—

Discussion Possible New 

Committee. 

• Review/Approve Terms of 

Reference/Leadership. 

• Special Committee chairman’s 

Reports. 

• Action Item Review: 

• SC–205—Software Considerations. 

• Review Committee Status. 

• Review/Approve revised Terms of 

Reference of additional work to 

modify RTCA DO–278—Guidelines 

for Communications, Navigation, 

Surveillance, and Air Traffic 

Management Systems Software 

Integrity Assurance. 

• Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS)—

Discussion—Possible New 

Committee Request. 

• Closing Session (Other Business, 

Document Production, Date and 

Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn). 

Attendance is open to the interested 

public but limited to space availability. 

With the approval of the chairmen, 

members of the public may present oral 

statements at the meeting. Persons 

wishing to present statements or obtain 

information should contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. Members of the public 

may present a written statement to the 

committee at any time. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 13, 

2005. 

Natalie Ogletree, 

FAA General Engineer, RTCA Advisory 

Committee. 

[FR Doc. 05–21145 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Record of Decision: Washington 

County, UT 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the 

Record of Decision following a Final 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

transportation improvements in 

Washington County, Utah. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this 

notice to advise the public that a Record 

of Decision (ROD) has been made 

following a Final Environmental Impact 

Statement prepared for the Southern 

Corridor project within Washington 

County, Utah. The ROD approves a 

location proposed for transportation 

improvements for the Southern Corridor 

project Washington County, Utah. The 

Southern Corridor Study Area includes 

an area in southern Washington County 

south and southeast of Interstate 15 (I–

15) and State Route 9 (SR 9) including 

the cities of St. George, Washington, and 

Hurricane. The Selected Alternative 

(2800 West Alternative) includes a new 

interchange with I–15 at Reference Post 

2 (Atkinville) and a new four-lane 

highway extending 26 miles to the 

intersection of 2800 West with SR 9. 

Selection of the Preferred Alternative 

was based on the best overall public 

interest to provide a safe and efficient 

transportation system and the social, 

economic, and environmental impacts. 

In addition, the project team considered 

public and resource agency input and 

city council recommendations or 

resolutions regarding the project.