United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.C., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. ARMY 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MIDDLE EAST 

DISTRICT, Afghanistan, FA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0672

Issued: September 24, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On February 3, 2020 appellant filed a timely appeal from a January 6, 2020 merit decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act1(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over 

the merits of this case.

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation, effective

June 19, 2018, finding that he forfeited his entitlement to compensation pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

§ 8148(a).

FACTUAL HISTORY

On March 18, 2012 appellant, then a 50-year-old construction control representative, filed 

an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that he developed depression and post-

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2

traumatic stress disorder due to factors of his federal employment, including being under constant 

fire and rocket attack. He noted that he first became aware of his claimed conditions on 

November 16, 2011 and realized their relationship to his federal employment on January 2, 2012.2 

On October 2, 2012 OWCP accepted appellant’s claim for post-traumatic stress disorder, 

dysthymic disorder, and depressive disorder. It paid him wage-loss compensation on the 

supplemental rolls as of October 16, 2012 and the periodic rolls as of August 19, 2013.

A November 14, 2018 investigative report authored by the employing establishment’s 

criminal investigation division revealed that appellant was employed by the government of 

Botswana, Africa and received approximately $21,310.03 in salary, which was not reported on his 

annual EN1032 forms. 

On October 15, 2017 appellant signed a plea bargain agreement, pleading guilty to one 

count of theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. 

An August 15, 2018 judgment issued by the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Texas, Waco Division indicated that on June 19, 2018 appellant pled guilty to one count 

of theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641. He was also ordered to pay $21,310.03 in 

restitution to OWCP.

By decision dated January 15, 2019, OWCP found that appellant had forfeited his 

entitlement to compensation effective August 15, 2018, the date of his conviction, as he pled guilty 

to defrauding the FECA program by theft of government property. It determined that, as a result 

of his conviction, and in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) and 20 C.F.R. § 10.17, he was not 

entitled to receive further benefits under FECA for this claim. OWCP further advised that all 

authorized medical treatment received prior to the date of this decision would be paid, but no 

further medical treatment would be paid beyond the date of the decision.

In a notice dated January 15, 2019, OWCP made a preliminary determination that appellant 

had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $28,747.54 for the period 

August 15, 2018 through January 5, 2019 because he pled guilty to one count of theft of 

government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641. It found that he was at fault in the creation of the 

overpayment. OWCP explained its calculation of the overpayment, informed appellant of the 

actions he could take, and allotted him 30 days to respond. 

On January 26, 2019 appellant requested an oral hearing before a representative of 

OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review regarding the January 15, 2019 forfeiture decision. On 

February 11, 2019 he requested a prerecoupment hearing regarding the January 15, 2019 

preliminary overpayment determination. 

By decision dated April 22, 2019, an OWCP hearing representative vacated the January 15, 

2019 forfeiture decision and the January 15, 2019 preliminary overpayment determination and 

remanded the case to OWCP to recalculate the amount of the overpayment for the period June 19, 

2018 through January 5, 2019. 

 

2 The record reveals that appellant stopped work on January 4, 2012. 
3

Thereafter, OWCP received an April 25, 2019 memorandum for the file in which the DOL 

Office of the Solicitor advised that the effective date for the termination of appellant’s 

compensation under 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) should be June 19, 2018, the date he pled guilty and the 

court accepted his plea. An accompanying U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas criminal 

docket showed that an indictment filed against him for one count of theft/embezzlement of federal 

property was entered on January 10, 2017, that his plea agreement was entered on October 18, 

2017, and that his guilty plea was entered on June 19, 2018. 

OWCP, in a June 18, 2019 forfeiture decision, terminated appellant’s entitlement to 

compensation effective June 19, 2018, under 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) as he pled guilty to one count of 

theft of Federal Government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. 

On July 29, 2019 appellant requested a telephonic oral hearing of the June 18, 2019 

forfeiture decision before an OWCP hearing representative, which was held on 

November 14, 2019. During the hearing he contended that, at the time he signed the plea 

agreement, he did not have adequate counsel. Appellant maintained that he was not aware of the 

ramifications of signing the agreement and he did not realize that it would be considered a 

conviction/guilty plea. Further, he maintained that, at the time of the plea agreement, he was 

recovering from bone cancer and undergoing radiation and chemotherapy, and thus, he was not in 

a state of mind to make the decision regarding the agreement. Additionally, appellant asserted that 

he had not intended to defraud the government. He claimed that he was not aware that he was 

prohibited from working in a job outside of the continental United States. 

By decision dated January 20, 2020, an OWCP hearing representative affirmed the 

June 18, 2019 decision. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Public Law No. 103-333, enacted on September 30, 1994 amended FECA by adding 5 

U.S.C. § 8148, which provides for the termination of benefits payable to beneficiaries who have 

been convicted of defrauding FECA program. Section 8148(a) specifically provides that an 

individual convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1920 or any other federal or state criminal statute 

relating to fraud in the application for or receipt of a benefit under FECA, shall forfeit, as of the 

date of such conviction, entitlement to any benefit to which such individual would otherwise be 

entitled under FECA for an injury occurring on or before the date of such conviction. Such 

forfeiture shall be in addition to any action the Secretary may take under section 81063(forfeiture) 

or section 81294(recovery of overpayments) of FECA.5

20 C.F.R. § 10.17 of OWCP’s implementing regulations provides that, when a claimant 

pleads guilty to federal or state criminal charges of fraud in connection with receipt of Federal 

Government benefits, the claimant’s entitlement to further compensation benefits will terminate 

 

3 5 U.S.C. § 8106.

4

Id. at § 8129.

5

Id. at § 8148; see L.C., Docket No. 19-1094 (issued February 25, 2020); D.S., Docket No. 18-1173 (issued June 13, 

2019); F.C., 59 ECAB 666 (2007).
4

effective the date the guilty plea is accepted. Termination of entitlement under this section is not 

affected by any subsequent change in or recurrence of the beneficiary’s medical condition.

6

OWCP’s procedures provide that in support of termination or suspension of compensation 

the record must contain copies of the indictment or information and the plea agreement, if any, or 

the document containing the guilty verdict. Further, this evidence must establish that the 

individual was convicted and that the conviction is related to the claim for or receipt of 

compensation benefits under FECA.7 The termination is effective on the date of the verdict or on 

the date the guilty plea is accepted and guilt adjudicated.8 Because of the criminal basis for the 

termination, no pretermination notice is required before a final decision is issued.9

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation, effective 

June 19, 2018, finding that he forfeited his entitlement to compensation pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

§ 8148(a).

As noted, under section 8148(a) of FECA, a claimant who is convicted of fraud in obtaining 

compensation benefits under 18 U.S.C. § 1920 or any other federal or state criminal statue relating 

to fraud in the application for or receipt of a benefit under FECA is permanently barred from 

receiving compensation under FECA.10 

The case record establishes that on January 10, 2017 appellant was indicted on one count 

of theft/embezzlement of federal property under 18 U.S.C. § 641 after an investigation discovered 

that he had not reported employment activity on his EN1023 forms. On June 19, 2018 he pled 

guilty to one count of theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641. OWCP’s procedures 

provide that the termination is effective on the date the guilty plea is accepted.11 The Board thus 

finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s FECA compensation benefits, effective 

June 19, 2018, the date that his guilty plea was entered.

12

On appeal appellant contends that he was not competent to make a decision pertaining to 

his legal court case as he was recovering from cancer and was heavily medicated, which was 

known by the court and his attorney. Additionally, he contends that his government-appointed 

 

6 20 C.F.R. § 10.17.

7 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, Disallowances, Chapter 2.1400.17(c)(2) (February 2013).

8

Id. at Chapter 2.1400.17(d) (February 2013).

9

Id. at Chapter 2.1400.4(a)(6) (February 2013).

10 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a); 20 C.F.R. § 10.17; see R.R., Docket No. 18-0804 (issued October 8, 2019); R.M., Docket No. 

17-0141 (issued March 28, 2018).

11 Supra note 8.

12 See K.V., Docket No. 19-1947 (issued May 28, 2020): R.R., supra note 10; D.S., Docket No. 18-1173 (issued 

June 13, 2019).
5

attorney provided ineffective counsel during his legal case. However, appellant has not submitted

evidence to support his contentions. 

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation, effective

June 19, 2018, finding that he forfeited his entitlement to compensation pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

§ 8148(a).13

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the January 6, 2020 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: September 24, 2020

Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

13 The Board notes that, although OWCP issued a preliminary notice of overpayment, the record does not establish 

that a final overpayment decision has been issued.