alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61308-61309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before September 24, 2005. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR 
part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these 
properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be 
forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., 2280, 
Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St. NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by November 7, 2005.

Patrick W. Andrus,
Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program.

ALASKA

Fairbanks North Star Borough-Census Area Constitution Hall, 
University of Alaska Fairbanks campus, Fairbanks, 05001196

ARIZONA

Maricopa County

Alma Ward Meeting House, 809 W. Main St., Mesa, 05001198

Selleh House, 1104 S. Mill Ave., Tempe, 05001197

COLORADO

Huerfano County

Huerfano County High School, 415 Walsen Ave., Walsenburg, 05001200

KANSAS

Anderson County

Kirk, Sennett and Bertha, House, 145 W. Fourth Ave., Garnett, 
05001199

Butler County

Oak Lawn Farm Dairy Barn, 1246 NW Meadowlark, Whitewater, 05001202

Jewell County

Burr Oak School, (Public Schools of Kansas MPS) 776 Kansas, Burr 
Oak, 05001201

[[Page 61309]]

Philips County

Pleasant Ridge Church, 381 E. Buffalo Rd., Phillipsburg, 05001204

Rooks County

St. Joseph Catholic Church, 105 N. Oak St., Damar, 05001203
[FR Doc. 05-21035 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Date:
    
    November 8, 2005/s/ N. MICHAEL DION

N. Michael DionExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42

                                  PULITZER INC.
                           RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD

This Certificate sets forth the terms of the restricted stock unit award made by
Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company") to Robert C. Woodworth ("Executive") on December
11, 2002 (the "Award Date") pursuant to the Pulitzer Inc. 1999 Key Employees'
Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

         1. Number of Shares Covered by Award. The number of units ("Units")
covered by this award is 20,533, each Unit being the notional equivalent of one
share of common stock of the Company. The Company has credited the 20,533 Units
to a bookkeeping account maintained by the Company in the Executive's name,
effective as of the Award Date. The number of Units credited to the Executive's
account will be adjusted to reflect capital changes, if any, in accordance with
the terms of the Plan.

         2. Vesting. The Units covered by this award will vest at the end of
three years from the Award Date, subject to the Executive's continuing
employment or service with the Company, or, if earlier, upon the occurrence of
an event which would cause the acceleration of vesting under the terms of the
Executive Transition Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 between the Company
and the Executive.

         3. Dividend Equivalents. The Company will make cash payments to the
Executive equal to the dividends that would have been paid on the shares
represented by the Units credited to the Executive's account as if the Executive
owned those shares outright. The dividend equivalent payments will be made as
soon as practicable after dividends are paid on the Company's outstanding
shares.

         4. Distribution of Shares. If and when the Units become vested, the
Company will transfer to the Executive a number of shares of Common Stock equal
to the number of Units then credited to the Executive's account in full
satisfaction of the Executive's interest hereunder, subject, however, to such
deferral requirements as the Company may impose in order to avoid a limitation
of its income tax deduction attributable to such transfer by reason of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

         5. Withholding. All amounts payable to the Executive hereunder, whether
in cash or in kind, will be subject to applicable withholding requirements.


Accepted and Agreed to by:                     PULITZER INC.



/s/ Robert C. Woodworth                        By: /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
-----------------------                            ---------------------
Robert C. Woodworth                                Alan G. Silverglat
                                                   Senior Vice President-Finance
Opinion issued April 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00364-CV

———————————

MELVIN TAYLOR AND J&S EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, Appellants

V.

JOHN PETROSKY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-48573

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion for reversal and remand for 

entry of judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties 

have settled all matters in controversy. By their motion, the parties have agreed 

that the underlying judgment should be reversed, and the case should be remanded 
2

for entry of a take-nothing judgment. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the agreed motion, reverse the trial court’s 

judgment, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of a take-nothing 

judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The motion does not specify that the 

parties have reached an agreement regarding costs. Accordingly, costs are taxed 

against the appellants, Melvin Taylor and J&S Exchange, Incorporated. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

Julie Countiss

Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
Exhibit 10.7(a)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    CTA Capital LLC
    
    Citigroup Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.
    
    CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 ALTIS PARTNERS (JERSEY) LIMITED
 By:
    
    /s/ Richard PlanePrint Name:
    
    Richard PlaneExecutive Director
RE: EXPANSION OF ELECTRONIC FILING PILOT PROGRAM - COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Appellate Case No. 2015-002439

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

January 23, 2019

**556ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article V, Section 4 of the South Carolina Constitution,

IT IS ORDERED that the Pilot Program for the Electronic Filing (E-Filing) of documents in the Court of Common Pleas, which was established by Order dated December 1, 2015, is expanded to include Darlington County. Effective February 5, 2019, all filings in all common pleas cases commenced or pending in Darlington County must be E-Filed if the party is represented by an attorney, unless the type of case or the type of filing is excluded from the Pilot Program. The counties currently designated for mandatory E-Filing are as follows:

?

Attorneys should refer to the South Carolina Electronic Filing Policies and Guidelines, which were adopted by the Supreme Court on October 28, 2015, and the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page at *http://www.sccourts.org/efiling/* to determine whether any specific filings are exempted from the requirement that they be E-Filed. Attorneys who have cases pending in Pilot Counties are strongly encouraged to review, and to instruct their staff to **557review, the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*

Donald W. Beatty

Chief Justice of South Carolina
#### Mabel G. Townsend and Leo A. Townsend, her Husband, *Appellants,*v. Gulf View Park Company, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 27, 1928.

*Early*c& *Arnest,*for Appellants;

*Sawyer, Surreney, Garter & Keen,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg*849ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officerand Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mrs. FieldsFamous Brands, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the 13 weeks endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Stephen Russo, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Mark C. McBride, as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ Stephen Russo        |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Stephen Russo            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |
| November 10, 2006        |   |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/ Mark C. McBride      |   |   |
| Mark C. McBride          |   |
| Chief Accounting Officer |   |
| November 10, 2006        |   |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

A signed original of this statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC and will beretained by Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory committee meeting.

*Name:*                     National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality.                

*Time and Date:*                     October 21, 2005, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.                

*Place:*                     Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 443E, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

*Purpose:*                     The purpose of this working session will be to discuss a letter and report to the HHS Secretary on Privacy and the National Health Information Network.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Substantive program information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be obtained from Maya A. Bernstein, Lead Staff for Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 434E Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., 20201; telephone (202) 690-7100; or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site:                     *http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​,*                     where further information including an agenda will be posted when available.                

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible.

Dated: October 14, 2005.

James Scanlon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (OSDP), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 05-20991 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Gordon F. DuGan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|/s/ Gordon F. DuGan    |                        
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                  | Gordon F. DuGan        
|Title:                 | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |                        
|Date:   August 9, 2012 |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on February 17, 2005 starting at 9 a.m. at the Mid-Oregon Federal Credit Union Conference Room on 1386 NE Cushing (near the corner of 27th and Neff), Bend, Oregon. Agenda items will include an update of litigation, a briefing on the new planning rule, subbasin planning, Upper Deschutes Resource Management Plan, rechartering, Mt. Hood NF working group charter, Northwest Forest Plan monitoring, and an update of the B and B project. The remainder of the day will include info sharing and a Public Forum from 12:30 p.m. till 1 p.m. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, Deschutes NF, Crescent RD, PO Box 208, Crescent, OR 97754, Phone (541) 433-3216.

Leslie A.C. Weldon,

Deschutes National Forest Supervisor, Designated Forest Official.

[FR Doc. 05-2037  Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALFONSO BODDIE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 557 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Carhart & Curd, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*George W. Bivims, defendant in error.

(By two judges.) Where, in a suit by two persons on a debt due before the first of June, 1865, the proper affidavit of payment of taxes was filed, and on the trial before the jury the interrogatories of one of the partners were read, to the effect that he had always regularly given in and paid taxes on his solvent notes, and that the note sued on was solvent, and he had always included it in his tax-returns and paid taxes on it, atf he believed, though he could not positively call to mind his giving in this particular note:

*625*Held,*That it was error in the Court to dismiss the case; there was sufficient evidence to carry the case to the jury, leaving them to determine whether or not the taxes had been duly paid, and whether or not the witness did not mean that he had, as one of the firm, given in this note and paid the taxes thereon. 27th February, 18,72.

Relief Act of 1870. Before Judge Clark. Sumter Superior Court. October Term, 1871.

Carhart *&*Curd sued Bivins upon his note, made in 1861. Before trial, affidavit of payment of taxes, as required by the Relief Act of 1870, was filed. On the trial, Curd testified : “I gave in my taxes in bulk, or rather returned in bulk all taxable property I owned, and have regularly done so for each and every year from the time I first owned said note to the present time. I regard the paper as solvent, and have classed it with my solvent debts, and have always returned it as taxable property, and paid regularly the taxes on same, in bulk, with other solvent assets.”

The Court dismissed the cause because it was not proven that plaintiffs had paid all taxes required of them by said Act of 1870. This is assigned as error.

Hawkins & Guerry, for plaintiff in error.

C. T. Goode ; W. A. Hawkins, for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

We think this case ought to have gone to the jury. There was some evidence that the taxes were paid; indeed, we think, had the jury found, under the evidence, that they were paid, we could not say that they found contrary to evidence or without evidence. The witness swears he had always included this note in his tax-returns, and that he had given it in every year. Why, as he was one of the partners, may not this have been the truth of the case ? Perhaps he was the active partner, and it may have been he that always made the return and paid the tax. Perjury ought not to be inferred. The witness *626swears, very positively, that he did give in and pay the tax. What reason is there for saying he did not ? If the jury believe the testimony, there ought to have been a verdict instead of a non-suit.

It is for the jury, and not the Court, to pass upon the proof of the payment of taxes. Here was some proof, and we think the Court erred in dismissing the case.

Judgment reversed.
STATE v. Montrez Benjamin WILLIAMS

233P12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Montrez Benjamin.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender.

*641The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of January 2019 by Defendant for Motion to Remove from Electronic Site.

"Motion Dismissed without prejudice to refile with more specificity by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
First Amend. to Employment Agt









EXHIBIT 10.15




 




FOURTH

AMENDMENT TO




OUTSIDE DIRECTORS’ 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN




 




THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT to

the Outside Directors’ 1996 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) of College

Television Network, Inc. (the “Company”) (formerly known as Laser Video

Network, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, (this “Amendment”) is made

effective as of the 13th day of May, 1999 (the “Effective Date”).  All capitalized terms in this Amendment have

the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan, unless otherwise stated herein.




W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:




WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan to

adjust the exercise price of options granted thereunder.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises

contained herein, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:




1.             Section 6(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting

Section 6(a) in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:




“The exercise

price per share of Common Stock under each option shall be determined by the

Executive Committee of the Company in its sole discretion.”




2.             Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the

Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the

Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.




 




                                                                                                COLLEGE

TELEVISION NETWORK, INC.




 




 




	

  By:


  	

  /s/ Jason Elkin


  
	

   


  	

  Jason Elkin


  
	

   


  	

  Chief Executive

  Officer


  





ATTEST:




 




 




	

  By:


  	

  /s/ Patrick Doran


  
	

   


  	

  Patrick Doran, Secretary