United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Oakland, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 19-1839

Issued: January 8, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Cary J. Silberman, for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On September 3, 2019 appellant, through his representative, filed a timely appeal from a

June 19, 2019 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).2 

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 The record also contains a May 9, 2019 OWCP decision pertaining to an overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $5,381.16 for the period September 30, 2017 through March 3, 2018 for which appellant was with fault. 

However, neither appellant nor his representative have appealed from that decision. As such, the May 9, 2019

overpayment decision will not be considered. 
2

Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act3(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 

501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.4

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the modified amount of $31,585.24, for the period June 13, 2008 

through April 2, 2016 for which he was not at fault, as he concurrently received FECA wage-loss 

compensation and Social Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits without 

an appropriate offset; and (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment. 

FACTUAL HISTORY

This case has previously been before the Board.

5

 The facts and circumstances as set forth 

in the Board’s prior decision are incorporated herein by reference. The relevant facts are as 

follows.

On January 31, 2008 appellant, then a 71-year-old maintenance mechanic, filed a traumatic 

injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on January 30, 2008 he sustained an injury to his right 

hand while cleaning a moving conveyor belt. He stopped work on January 30, 2008. OWCP 

accepted the claim for open wound of right hand, injury to right digital nerve, multiple wounds of 

right arm, and right hand contusion. It paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the supplemental 

rolls commencing June 13, 2008 and on the periodic rolls as of May 10, 2009.

On September 27, 2012 OWCP granted appellant a schedule award for 16 percent 

permanent impairment of his right upper extremity. The award ran for the period September 23, 

2012 to September 7, 2013, for a total of 49.92 weeks of compensation. On September 8, 2013,

after the period of the schedule award ceased, OWCP resumed payment of appellant’s wage-loss 

compensation.

On April 20, 2016 SSA advised that an offset was required as appellant received SSA agerelated retirement benefits beginning January 2008. It provided OWCP with his SSA rate with 

Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) and SSA rate without FERS from January 2008 

onward. OWCP adjusted appellant’s ongoing compensation payment to appropriately apply the 

required FERS offset beginning April 3, 2016. 

 

3 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

4 The Board notes that following the June 19, 2019 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that 

was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board 

for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional 

evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.

5 Docket No. 17-0495 (issued April 19, 2018). 
3

On April 26, 2016 OWCP issued a preliminary determination that a $57,781.12 

overpayment of compensation was created for the period January 1, 2008 to April 2, 2016 as 

appellant was paid prohibited dual benefits, by having received FECA compensation benefits and 

SSA age-related retirement benefits without an appropriate offset. It found that he was not at fault 

in the matter and provided him with a detailed memorandum which showed how the overpayment

during the period January 1, 2008 through April 2, 2016 was calculated. OWCP requested that 

appellant complete the enclosed overpayment action request and overpayment recovery 

questionnaire (Form OWCP-20), and submit supporting financial documentation. It notified him 

that he had 30 days to request a telephone conference, a final decision based on the written 

evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing. 

On May 2, 2016 appellant requested a prerecoupment hearing before a representative of

OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review on the issue of waiver of recovery of the overpayment. 

A telephonic hearing was held on August 25, 2016.

By decision dated November 9, 2016, OWCP finalized its determination that appellant 

received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $57,781.12 for which he was without 

fault. It denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment as he failed to provide the necessary 

financial evidence with regard to his assets, income, and expenses to establish that he was unable 

to repay the debt or that recovery of the debt would be against equity and good conscience. OWCP

required that the overpayment would be recovered at the rate of $600.00 per month from 

appellant’s continuing compensation.

6

On January 4, 2017 appellant appealed OWCP’s November 9, 2016 decision to the Board. 

By decision dated April 19, 2018, the Board set aside OWCP’s November 9, 2016 overpayment 

decision. The Board found that the $57,781.12 overpayment was incorrectly calculated because 

the overpayment period was incorrect. The case was remanded for a de novo decision regarding 

the issues of fact and amount of overpayment, waiver, and recovery.

On January 2, 2018 appellant elected Office of Personnel Management (OPM) retirement 

benefits in lieu of FECA wage-loss compensation benefits effective September 30, 2017.7

On September 7, 2018 OWCP completed a FERS offset calculation for the period June 13, 

2008 through April 2, 2016. It determined that the overpayment during this time period totaled 

$54,899.41. 

In a September 12, 2018 preliminary determination, OWCP notified appellant that he was 

overpaid benefits in the adjusted amount of $54,899.41 because he had received prohibited dual 

benefits without appropriate offset for the period June 13, 2008 through April 2, 2016, for which 

he was without fault. It explained that as payments had been received towards this overpayment 

in the amount of $11,354.90, the adjusted balance was $43,545.51. OWCP provided copies of the 

debt history as of September 12, 2018, a FERS/SSA recalculation worksheet dated September 10, 

 

6 The monthly recovery rate of $600.00 was converted into a 28-day payment of $553.85. 

7 OWCP terminated payment of compensation benefits effective March 4, 2018, based upon appellant’s election of 

OPM benefits effective September 30, 2017, in lieu of FECA benefits. 
4

2018, and copies of appellant’s compensation payment history for the period June 13, 2008 

through April 2, 2016. It requested that he complete the enclosed Form OWCP-20 and submit 

supporting financial documentation. OWCP notified appellant that he had 30 days to request a 

telephone conference, a final decision based on the written evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing. 

Appellant, through his representative, requested a prerecoupment hearing. A signed Form 

OWCP-20 dated October 1, 2018 listed appellant’s total monthly income of $5,400.00 and 

monthly expenses of $4,500.00. Available funds totaled $26,000.00, including $15,000.00 in a 

checking account. No supporting financial information was received. 

A telephonic hearing was held on April 11, 2019. The representative argued that no legal 

basis for an offset existed. Appellant testified that he received his monthly SSA age-related 

retirement benefit, a pension, and an annuity from his Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). He denied other 

income and indicated that there were no other individuals in his household. Appellant noted that 

he only had a mortgage and a car payment for debt and paid his credit card in full each month, 

which included all incidentals including food. He reported a checking account balance of roughly 

$10,000.00.

OWCP also received an itemization of appellant’s monthly income and expenses. His 

monthly expenses totaled $4,636.00. This included a mortgage payment; car payments; various 

insurance premiums; utilities; internet and cable; fuel for two cars; groceries; and entertainment.8 

A single bank statement provided showed retirement income of $981.00, SSA income of 

$1,884.00, and a TSP distribution of $3,150.00, for a total monthly income of $6,015.00. It also 

showed monthly expenses including $1,273.07 for his mortgage payment, $117.88 for gas and 

electricity, withdrawals totaling $700.00, and numerous checks totaling close to $2,000.00 with 

no description. An automobile policy declaration establishing a total monthly premium of $254.42

for two cars, trash disposal bills indicated an approximate monthly rate of $40.00, water bills 

indicated approximate monthly rate of $40.00. 

By decision dated June 19, 2019, an OWCP hearing representative finalized OWCP’s 

preliminary overpayment determination, finding that appellant received an overpayment of 

compensation for the period June 13, 2008 through April 2, 2016.

9

 The hearing representative,

however, modified the amount of the overpayment as OWCP had failed to account for the SSA 

age-related retirement benefits appellant had received during the period of a prior schedule award, 

which was paid for the period September 23, 2012 through September 7, 2013. Thus the schedule 

award of $6,960.27, when subtracted from the overpayment amount of $43,545.51, resulted in a 

final overpayment amount of $31,185.24. The hearing representative denied waiver of recovery 

of the overpayment and set a repayment schedule.

 

8 Monthly expenses for groceries were listed at $600.00 and entertainment expenses were listed at $1,200.00. 

9 The Board notes that the period of the overpayment in the decision incorrectly noted that the period of the 

overpayment ended on April 21, 2016.
5

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of his 

or her federal employment.10 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive 

compensation. While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, 

pay, or remuneration of any type from the United States.11 When an overpayment of compensation 

has been made to an individual because of an error of fact or law, adjustment shall be made under 

regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Labor by decreasing later payments to which the 

individual is entitled.12

Section 10.421(d) of the FECA implementing regulations requires that OWCP reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of SSA age-related retirement benefits that are attributable 

to federal service of the employee.13 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have 

to be adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA age-related retirement benefits because the portion of 

the SSA benefit earned as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the 

receipt of FECA benefits and federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.14

An offset is not required when a retired federal employee is receiving compensation for a 

schedule award under section 8107.15 OWCP’s regulations provide that retirement benefits paid 

by the Office of Personnel Management or SSA can be paid concurrently with schedule award 

compensation under FECA without a deduction from FECA benefits.16

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the modified amount of $31,585.24, for the period June 13, 2008 through 

April 2, 2016 for which he was not at fault, as he concurrently received FECA wage-loss 

compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits without an appropriate offset. 

The record indicates that, while appellant was receiving compensation for disability under 

FECA, he was also receiving SSA age-related retirement benefits. A FECA beneficiary may not 

receive wage-loss compensation concurrently with SSA age-related retirement benefits 

 

10 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).

11 Id. at § 8116.

12 Id. at § 8129(a).

13 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see T.B., Docket No. 18-1449 (issued March 19, 2019); L.J., 59 ECAB 264 (2007).

14 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (February 3, 1997).

15 See Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, Dual Benefits, Chapter 2.1000.6(b) (June 2009). See 

L.S., Docket No. 08-1270 (issued July 2, 2009); see also Richard A. Mattson, Docket No. 06-0264 (issued March 17, 

2006); Thaddeus J. Spevack, 53 ECAB 474 (2002).

16 Supra note 14; see also J.M., Docket No. 18-1505 (issued June 21, 2019); K.H., Docket No. 18-0171 (issued 

August 2, 2018); A.S., Docket No. 17-1459 (issued December 22, 2017).
6

attributable to federal service for the same period.17 Consequently, the fact of overpayment has 

been established.

To determine the amount of overpayment, SSA informed OWCP of appellant’s SSA rate 

with FERS and without FERS during the applicable periods. SSA noted that appellant had 

received age-related retirement benefits from June 13, 2008 through April 2, 2016 in the amount 

of $54,585.24. The hearing representative properly found that an additional $6,960.27 should have 

been excluded for the period September 23, 2012 to September 7, 2013.

18

 The Board finds that 

subtracting the schedule award amount of $6,960.27 from the $54,899.41 overpayment for the 

period June 13, 2008 through April 2, 2016, results in an overpayment of $47,939.14.19 Based on 

payments made initially from appellant’s continuing disability compensation and thereafter on 

behalf of appellant by OPM, the hearing representative properly calculated that an adjusted 

overpayment remained unpaid in the modified amount of $31,185.24. 

On appeal counsel challenges the fact and amount of overpayment. As explained above, 

the Board finds that OWCP properly found that appellant had received a prohibited dual benefit 

because he concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation which created an overpayment of compensation.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129(b) of FECA provides: “Adjustment or recovery [of an overpayment] by the 

United States may not be made when incorrect payment has been made to an individual who is not 

at fault and when adjustment or recovery would defeat the purpose of this subchapter or would be 

against equity and good conscience.”

20

Section 10.437 of the FECA implementing regulations provides that recovery of an 

overpayment is considered to be against equity and good conscience when an individual who 

received an overpayment of compensation would experience severe financial hardship attempting 

to repay the debt; and when an individual, in reliance on such payments or on notice that such 

payments would be made, gives up a valuable right or changes his or her position for the worse.21

Section 10.438 of OWCP’s implementing regulations provides that the individual who 

received the overpayment is responsible for providing information about income, expenses, and 

assets as specified by OWCP. This information is needed to determine whether or not recovery 

on an overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. 

 

17 Supra note 14; see also D.C., Docket No. 19-0118 (issued January 15, 2020); T.B., supra note 13; L.J., supra

note 13.

18 See id.

19 The hearing representative properly noted that due to payments received the remaining balance of the 

overpayment was $31,185.24 and continued to be reduced. 

20 5 U.S.C. § 8129(b).

21 20 C.F.R. § 10.437.
7

The information is also used to determine the repayment schedule, if necessary.22 Failure to submit 

the requested information within 30 days of the request shall result in denial of waiver.23

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment of 

compensation.

As OWCP found appellant not at fault in the creation of the overpayment, waiver must be 

considered, and repayment is still required unless adjustment or recovery of the overpayment 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.24 Appellant, 

however, had the responsibility to provide the appropriate financial information to OWCP.25

OWCP clearly explained the importance of providing the completed overpayment 

questionnaire and supporting financial documentation, including copies of income tax returns, 

bank account statements, bills, pay slips, and any other records to support income and expenses. 

It advised appellant that it would deny waiver of recovery if he failed to furnish the requested 

financial information within 30 days. While appellant submitted a completed Form OWCP-20 

overpayment recovery questionnaire and supporting financial documentation, the Board finds that 

OWCP properly determined that appellant did not require substantially all of his income to meet 

ordinary living expenses as his monthly income exceeded his ordinary and necessary living 

expenses by more than $50.00.26 Additionally, as appellant did not submit sufficient 

documentation of his income and expenses as required under section 10.438 of OWCP’s 

regulations, which was necessary to determine his eligibility for waiver, OWCP properly denied 

waiver of recovery of the overpayment.27

On appeal appellant asserts that he cannot afford to pay back the overpayment amount. As 

explained above, OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.28

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the modified amount of $31,585.24, for the period June 13, 2008 through 

April 2, 2016 for which he was not at fault, as he concurrently received FECA wage-loss 

 

22 Id. at § 10.438(a); see T.B., supra note 13; Ralph P. Beachum, Sr., 55 ECAB 442 (2004).

23 Id. at § 10.438.

24 Id. at § 10.436.

25 Supra note 23.

26 Supra note 24. See also G.L., Docket No. 19-0297 (issued October 23, 2019).

27 See D.C., supra note 17; S.B., Docket No. 16-1795 (issued March 2, 2017).

28 See 20 C.F.R. § 10.438 (in requesting waiver, the overpaid individual has the responsibility for providing 

financial information).
8

compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits without an appropriate offset. The Board 

also finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 19, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: January 8, 2021

Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board