alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sam Houston Meera Singh P. O. Box 1SC^4 Austin, TX 78760-9814 512 257 9028 r—i 4.^-;7(g)hotmail.com Singh749(5)hotmail.com September 20, 2015 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAILto Kimberly Harris * *USPS to the Cc-t ;:::!: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE t:::~ z:z~t.:zt cf texas P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 

### (512)463-1733

RE: Case Number: 03-14-00342-CV Trial Court No.: 13-0936-C368 Kennon, R.Judge Style: "cara S;r,gh and Sam Houston v. Ally Financial, Inc. et al. Please find Appellants Notice of their Appeal to the Texas Supreme Court on their Petition to hear their Plea to the Jurisdiction ofthe district Court and court of appeals and theirtimely notification to Ally Financial, Inc. Counsel ofreccri 

# ^Q^

^RECEIVEDS SEP 2 5 2015 \ THIRDCOURTOf APPEALS > \ JEFFREYD. KYLE X

### Case No. 03-14-00342-CV

COURT OF APPEALS 

### THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS



### ALLYFINANCIAL, INC., et al, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. 

### MEERA SINGH and SAM HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant. RECEIVED SEP25 2M5 THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS •EffREYDKYLE 

## ONAPPEALFROM368th DISTRICTCOURTWILLIAMSON COUNTY Trial Court No. 13-0936-C368 

### APPELLANT'SNOTICE OFAPPEAL TO TEXAS SUPREME COURTONA PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION

### TO: Third Court of Appeals
Having been denied a rehearing, September 17, 2015, by this Court timely Notice is hereby given that Appellant's intend to Appeal this action to the Texas Supreme Court.

Sam Houston, Meera Singh Appellants P.O. Box 19814 Austin, Texas 78760 Samhouston7@hotmail.com 512 257 9028

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the 

### foregoing has been e-mailed to the below on this the 20th Day of September 2015. 

### Ally Financial Inc. 

## EMAIL: Jcharris@bhhlaw.com Kimberely Harris BEASLEY, HIGHTOWER, & HARRIS, P.C. 

### 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4350 Dallas, Texas 75201-7301 

### Phone:(214)220-4700Sam Houston 

### Meera Singh P. O. Box 1SC1-C Austin, TX 78760-9814 •GRANDE DISTRICT •P201S PM4 1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

### t:::~ r:~r.:cT oftexas P.O. BOX 12547, 

### AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 „,.>>'-'m"w«vi.,. "*•'"•""-'

"S7i1254747 

### j/WiV'/'''v'J''/''Ii/T'JJ/V''%J//IJ///l//')'/'J'
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4950 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4950

  To provide for improvements to the administration of bankruptcy in 
      cases under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Whitfield, and Mr. Conyers) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for improvements to the administration of bankruptcy in 
      cases under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Administration 
Improvement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEES.

    (a) New Asset Adjustments.--Section 326(a) of title 11, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``(a) In a case under chapter 7 or 
11'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a)(1) In a case under chapter 7, the court may allow reasonable 
compensation under section 330 of this title of the trustee for the 
trustee's services, payable after the trustee renders such services, 
not to exceed 25 percent on the first $50,000 or less, 15 percent on 
any amount in excess of $50,000 but not in excess of $250,000, 5 
percent on any amount in excess of $250,000 but not in excess of 
$1,000,000, and 3 percent on any amount in excess of $1,000,000, upon 
all moneys disbursed or turned over in the case by the trustee to 
parties in interest, excluding the debtor, but including holders of 
secured claims.
    ``(2) In a case under chapter 11''.
    (b) Compensation.--Section 330(a)(7) of title 11, the United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(7) In determining the amount of reasonable compensation to be 
awarded to a trustee under chapter 7, the court shall treat such 
compensation as a commission, based on section 326(a)(1).''.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    The amendments made by this Act shall not apply with respect to 
cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code before the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6824

CLIFTON MILES SUTTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-01-867-AM) Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clifton Miles Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Clifton Miles Sutton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Sutton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Sutton v. Angelone , No. CA-01-867-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6040
ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANITA SMITH, M.D., Medical Director of Valley Community Services; PATRICIA PORTER, M S W, Forensic Evaluator, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-333-2) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BENNIE FRANK TYSON

No. 7411SC122

(Filed 6 March 1974)

Appeal by defendant from *Smith, Judge,*10 September 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Johnston County.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by William F. O’Connell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Robert A. Spence for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant was ably represented at trial and on appeal from his conviction of robbery with firearms. We find no prejudicial error in his trial.

No error.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4064



# 

R ICHARD L. K ESLING ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge.

(CR-00-8)
Submitted: July 31, 2001
Decided: August 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL

J. Robert Russell, FURBEE, AMOS, WEBB & CRITCHFIELD, P.L.L.C., Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Melvin W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Kesling entered a guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 2000), and received a sentence of thirty months’ imprisonment. He contends onappeal the district court erred in finding his prior West Virginia conviction for first degree sexual abuse in violation of W. Va. Code § 61- 8B-7 was a crime of violence and in increasing his base offense level as a result. We affirm.

The federal sentencing guidelines applicable to a § 922(g)(1) conviction provide a base offense level of twenty if the defendant has oneprior felony conviction that is a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A)(1998). The term "crime of violence", as used in USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), is defined in USSG § 4B1.2(a), as "any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or . . . otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another." § 4B1.2(a). The determination as to whether an offense is a crime of violence is a question of law that this Court reviews de novo. United States v. Martin , 215 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2000).

Kesling was convicted of sexual contact without consent and by forcible compulsion with a fourteen or fifteen year old boy. We find the district court correctly held this offense, considered in the abstract, is a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.2(a).

Kesling also contends he was entitled to the six-level downwardspecific characteristic adjustment for possession of a weapon for lawful sporting or collection purposes pursuant to USSG § 2K2.1(b)(2). The district court correctly found Kesling was ineligible for this adjustment, since it is unavailable to one convicted of a prior crime of violence under § 2K2.1(a)(4). 2 U NITED S TATES v. K ESLINGAccordingly, we affirm Kesling’s sentence. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. K ESLING
Exhibit
      32.2











**IMPLANT
      SCIENCES CORPORATION**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation (the
      "Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane
      J.
      Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














*/s/*  Diane
      J. Ryan


Diane
      J.
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer


October
      12, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                      |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5133 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5133

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New Jersey, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
  Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. Schwarz Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT FRANK T. CARVILL AND LANCE CORPORAL MICHAEL 
              A. SCHWARZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New Jersey, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal 
Michael A. Schwarz Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. Schwarz Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5133

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 331 1st Street in Carlstadt, New Jersey, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
  Frank T. Carvill and Lance Corporal Michael A. Schwarz Post Office 
                              Building''.
```
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                               SUBSIDIARIES OF ACL


Names of Subsidiaries                               Jurisdiction of Organization
---------------------                               ----------------------------

ACBL de Venezuela, C.A                                          Venezuela
ACBL do Brasil Holdings, S.A                                    Uruguay
ACBL Dominicana S.A                                             Dominican
ACBL Hidrovias, Ltd.                                            Bermuda
ACBL Liquid Sales LLC                                           Delaware
ACBL Riverside Terminals C.A                                    Venezuela
ACBL Venezuela, Ltd.                                            Bermuda
ACL Capital Corp.                                               Delaware
Amazonas Holdings, S.A                                          Uruguay
American Commercial Barge Line LLC                              Delaware
American Commercial Lines Funding Corporation                   Delaware
American Commercial Lines International LLC                     Delaware
American Commercial Logistics LLC                               Delaware
American Commercial Terminals LLC                               Delaware
American Commercial Terminals - Memphis LLC                     Delaware
Houston Fleet LLC                                               Delaware
Jeffboat LLC                                                    Delaware
Lemont Harbor & Fleeting Services LLC                           Delaware
Louisiana Dock Company LLC                                      Delaware
Orinoco TASA LLC                                                Delaware
Orinoco TASV LLC                                                Delaware
River Terminal Properties, L.P.                                 Tennessee
Rylend, S.A                                                     Uruguay
Exhibit 10.6
 FIRST PLACE FINANCIAL CORP.  CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
 FIRST PLACE FINANCIAL CORP.   First Place Bank
 
  Term of Agreement.
 Extension of Term.
 Change in Control followed by Termination of Employment.
 - Page 1 -




---



##### 



Definitions.
 Change in Control.
 Termination for Cause.
 - Page 2 -




---



##### 



Termination Benefits.
 Sum Payable.
 Life and Medical Insurance Coverage.
 Section 280G.
 - Page 3 -




---



##### 



Notice of Termination.
 Form.
 Date of Termination.
 Dispute.
 - Page 4 -




---



##### 



Source of Payments.
 Effect on Prior Agreements and Existing Benefit Plans.
 No Attachment or Assignment.
 Successors.
 Modification and Waiver.
 Effect of Action Under Bank Agreement.
 Severability.
 Headings for Reference Only.
 Governing Law.
 - Page 5 -




---



##### 



Arbitration.
 Payment of Costs and Legal Fees.
 Indemnification.
 Successor to the Holding Company.
 FIRST PLACE FINANCIAL CORP.
    
    EXECUTIVESteven R. Lewis,President and Chief Executive Officer
 - Page 6 -
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20982]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 and 81

[R04-OAR-2005-KY-0001-200521(w); FRL-7985-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation 
of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Kentucky; Redesignation of 
the Christian County, Kentucky Portion of the Clarksville-Hopkinsville 
8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment for Ozone; Withdrawal of 
Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule published September 22, 2005, (70 FR 55550) approving the 
redesignation of the Clarksville-Hopkinsville 8-Hour Ozone 
Nonattainment Area to Attainment for Ozone. EPA stated in the direct 
final rule that if EPA received adverse comment by October 24, 2005, 
the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently 
received adverse comment. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent 
final action based upon the proposed action also published on September 
22, 2005 (70 FR 55613). EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule is withdrawn as of October 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy DiFrank, Air Planning Branch, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. DiFrank can be reached via phone at 
(404) 562-9042 or via electronic mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b5f525d495a555015484f5a58427b5e4b5a155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b3f323d293a353075282f3a38221b3e2b3a753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
    Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.919 and 52.920 (which 
published in the Federal Register on September 22, 2005, at 70 FR 
55550) is withdrawn as of October 21, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-20982 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4825 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4825

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 2010

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct unused appropriations for Members' Representational 
    Allowances to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit 
                reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL 
              ALLOWANCES TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO REDUCE 
              THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for Members' Representational Allowances for the 
House of Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 
payments are made under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited 
in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that in the case 
of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal budget deficit, such 
amounts shall be used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as the 
Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```