Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 199 / Monday, October 17, 2005 / Notices 60363 

Beginning date Ending date Underpayments (percent) Overpayments (percent) Corporate overpayments 

(Eff. 1–1–99) (percent) 

070174 063075 6 6 

070175 013176 9 9 

020176 013178 7 7 

020178 013180 6 6 

020180 013182 12 12 

020182 123182 20 20 

010183 063083 16 16 

070183 123184 11 11 

010185 063085 13 13 

070185 123185 11 11 

010186 063086 10 10 

070186 123186 9 9 

010187 093087 9 8 

100187 123187 10 9 

010188 033188 11 10 

040188 093088 10 9 

100188 033189 11 10 

040189 093089 12 11 

100189 033191 11 10 

040191 123191 10 9 

010192 033192 9 8 

040192 093092 8 7 

100192 063094 7 6 

070194 093094 8 7 

100194 033195 9 8 

040195 063095 10 9 

070195 033196 9 8 

040196 063096 8 7 

070196 033198 9 8 

040198 123198 8 7 

010199 033199 7 7 6 

040199 033100 8 8 7 

040100 033101 9 9 8 

040101 063001 8 8 7 

070101 123101 7 7 6 

010102 123102 6 6 5 

010103 093003 5 5 4 

100103 033104 4 4 3 

040104 063004 5 5 4 

070104 093004 4 4 3 

100104 033105 5 5 4 

040105 093005 6 6 5 

100105 123105 7 7 6 

Dated: October 11, 2005. 

Robert C. Bonner, 

Commissioner, Customs and Border 

Protection. 

[FR Doc. 05–20649 Filed 10–14–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–4971–N–53] 

Notice of Submission of Proposed 

Information Collection to OMB; 

Construction Complaint-Request for 

Financial Assistance 

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

has been submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal. 

The information collection is 

submitted by homeowners and is used 

by HUD to identify the items of 

complaint in order to help the 

homeowner obtain correction. The 

information is also used to identify 

builders not conforming to applicable 

standards and to determine eligibility 

for financial assistance. 

DATES: Comments Due Date: November 

16, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name and/or OMB 

approval number (2502–0047) and 

should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503; fax: 202–395–6974. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wayne Eddins, Reports Management 

Officer, AYO, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Wayne_Eddins@HUD.gov; or 

Lillian Deitzer at 

Lillian_L_Deitzer@HUD.gov or 

telephone (202) 708–2374. This is not a 

toll-free number. Copies of available 

documents submitted to OMB may be 

obtained from Mr. Eddins or Ms Deitzer 

or from HUD’s Web site at http:// 

hlannwp031.hud.gov/po/i/icbts/ 

collectionsearch.cfm. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice informs the public that the 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development has submitted to OMB a 

request for approval of the information 

collection described below. This notice 

is soliciting comments from members of 

60364 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 199 / Monday, October 17, 2005 / Notices 

the public and affecting agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) Enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) Minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond; including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

This notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: Construction 

Complaint-Request for Financial 

Assistance. 

OMB Approval Number: 2502–0047. 

Form Numbers: HUD–92556. 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and Its Proposed Use: The 

information collection is submitted by 

homeowners and is used by HUD to 

identify the items of complaint in order 

to help the homeowner obtain 

correction. The information is also used 

to identify builders not conforming to 

applicable standards and to determine 

eligibility for financial assistance. 

Frequency of Submission: On 

occasion. 

Number of 

respondents × Annual responses × Hours per response = Burden hours 

Reporting burden ...................................................................... 10 1 0.5 5 

Total Estimated Burden Hours: 5. 

Status: Extension of a currently 

approved collection. 

Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as 

amended. 

Dated: October 6, 2005. 

Wayne Eddins, 

Departmental Paperwork Reduction Act 

Officer, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–20645 Filed 10–14–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–72–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

Draft Comprehensive Conservation 

Plan and Environmental Impact 

Statement for Crab Orchard National 

Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Williamson, 

Jackson, and Union Counties, IL 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service 

announces that the Draft 

Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

(CCP) and Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) is available for Crab 

Orchard NWR, Illinois. 

The CCP/EIS was prepared pursuant 

to the National Wildlife Refuge System 

Administration Act of 1996, as amended 

by the National Wildlife Refuge System 

Improvement Act of 1997, and the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969. Goals and Objectives in the CCP 

describe how the agency intends to 

manage the refuge over the next 15 

years. 

DATES: Comments on the Draft CCP/EIS 

must be received on or before January 

17, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Draft CCP/EIS 

are available on compact disk or hard 

copy, you may obtain a copy by writing 

to: Fish and Wildlife Service, Division 

of Conservation Planning, Bishop Henry 

Whipple Federal Building, 1 Federal 

Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111 

or you may access and download a copy 

via the planning Web site at http:// 

www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/ 

craborchard/index.html. 

All comments should be addressed to 

Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, 

Attention: CCP Comment, 8588 Route 

148, Marion, IL 62959, or direct e-mail 

to r3planning@fws.gov. Comments may 

also be submitted through the Service’s 

regional Web site at http://www.fws.gov/ 

midwest/planning. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan 

Frisk at 618/997–3344. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Located in 

southern Illinois and consisting of 

43,888 acres, Crab Orchard NWR was 

established in 1947. In late 2000 we 

asked citizens for their ideas on what 

the comprehensive conservation plan 

should include and the issues that 

should be addressed. We gave citizens 

the opportunity to comment at open 

houses and through written comments. 

In three meetings early in 2001, we 

asked a diverse group of stakeholders to 

identify and prioritize issues facing the 

Refuge. 

Five alternative approaches to 

management, including a Preferred 

Alternative and a No Action (Current 

Management) Alternative, were 

considered for Crab Orchard National 

Wildlife Refuge. The five alternatives 

are described and evaluated in the Draft 

EIS. All alternatives would achieve the 

Refuge’s purposes of wildlife 

conservation, agriculture, recreation, 

and industry. Under all alternatives, 

group camps and most non-wildlife 

dependent recreation would remain; 

technical rock climbing would be 

prohibited; a modified recreational fee 

structure would be implemented; a 14- 

day camping limit would be instituted; 

management of sport fish populations 

would continue; use of prescribed fire 

would increase; and the agricultural 

acres would not change by more than 5 

percent. All alternatives would maintain 

food required for wintering Canada 

geese. Alternative A would continue the 

present course of management. 

Alternative B would reduce habitat 

fragmentation and emphasize wildlifedependent recreation. A land exchange 

with Southern Illinois University would 

be a significant part of this alternative. 

Alternative C would emphasize 

management of open lands and 

consolidate and improve recreation 

facilities. Alternative D would 

emphasize management of forest lands 

and consolidate and improve recreation 

facilities. Alternative E, the preferred 

alternative, would reduce habitat 

fragmentation and consolidate and 

improve recreation facilities. Conflicts 

among water users would be addressed 

by increasing areas designated as nowake zones and better enforcement of 

current use zoning regulations. The 

quality of campgrounds and marinas 

would be increased by consolidating 

and improving them. The agricultural 

program would remain largely as is and 

its economic effect continues. The 

industrial program would continue to 

support the munitions manufacturing 

industry. By encouraging other 

industries to locate in nearby industrial 

parks, the economic effect of the 

industry would remain in the local 

economy, and the needs of the industry 

would be met more efficiently. 

Increased efforts would be made to talk 

with and listen to the community. 

The National Wildlife Refuge System 

Administration Act of 1966, as amended 

by the National Wildlife Refuge System