United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.H., JR., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Mountain View, HI, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0372

Issued: November 19, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

D. Clay Sloan, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On December 6, 2019 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a June 14, 

2019 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the 

Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board 

has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.3

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

3 The Board notes that following the June 14, 2019 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that 

was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board 

for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional 

evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $67,875.37 for the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019, for which he was 

without fault, because he concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation and Social 

Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits without an appropriate offset;

(2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment; and (3) whether 

OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $550.00 from appellant’s 

continuing compensation payments every 28 days. 

FACTUAL HISTORY

On June 1, 1989 appellant, then a 50-year-old clerk, filed an occupational disease claim 

(Form CA-2) alleging that he sustained a stress-related condition after being interrogated by postal 

inspectors. On the reverse side of the claim form, the employing establishment noted that appellant 

stopped work April 11, 1989. OWCP accepted the claim for adjustment reaction. It paid appellant 

wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls as of February 11, 1990. 

In response to a March 20, 2019 inquiry, on March 27, 2019, SSA provided OWCP with a 

FERS/SSA dual benefit calculation worksheet setting forth appellant’s SSA benefit rates with 

FERS and without FERS from January 2007 through December 2018; effective January 2007, his 

rate with FERS was $1,345.70 and without FERS was $935.60; effective December 2007, his rate 

with FERS was $1,376.60 and without FERS was $957.10; effective December 2008, 

December 2009, and December 2010, his rate with FERS was $1,456.40 and without FERS was 

$1,012.60; effective December 2011, his rate with FERS was $1,508.80 and without FERS was

$1,049.00; effective December 2012, his rate with FERS was $1,534.30 and without FERS was 

$1,066.80; effective December 2013, his rate with FERS was $1,557.30 and without FERS 

was$1,082.80; effective December 2014 and December 2015, his rate with FERS was $1,583.70 

and without FERS was $1,101.20; effective December 2016, his rate with FERS was $1,588.30 

and without FERS was $1,104.50; effective December 2017, his rate with FERS was $1,620.00 

and without FERS was $1,126.50; effective December 2018, his rate with FERS was $1,665.30 

and without FERS was $1,158.00.

OWCP completed a FERS offset calculation form on April 18, 2019. It calculated the 

amounts that it should have offset from appellant’s wage-loss compensation from January 1, 2007 

through March 30, 2019: effective January 1, 2007, the monthly offset was $410.10 ($1,345.70 -

$935.600), or $378.55 every 28 days; effective December 1, 2007, the monthly offset was $419.50 

($1,376.60 - $957.10), or $387.23 every 28 days; effective December 1, 2008, December 1, 2009, 

and December 1, 2010, the monthly offset was $443.80 ($1,456.40 - $1,012.60), or $409.66 every 

28 days; effective December 1, 2011, the monthly offset was $459.80 ($1,508.80 - $1,049.00), or 

$424.43 every 28 days; effective December 1, 2012, the monthly offset was $467.50 ($1,534.30 -

$1,066.80), or $431.54 every 28 days; effective December 1, 2013, the monthly offset was $474.50 

($1,557.30 - $1,082.80), or $438.00 every 28 days; effective December 1, 2014 and December 1, 

2015, the monthly offset was $482.50 ($1,583.70 - $1,101.20), or $445.38 every 28 days; effective 

December 1, 2016, the monthly offset was $483.80 ($1,588.30 - $1,104.50), or $446.58 every 28 

days; effective December 1, 2017, the monthly offset was $493.50 ($1,620.00 - $1,126.50), or 

$455.54 every 28 days; and effective December 1, 2018 through March 30, 2019, the monthly 
3

offset was $507.30 ($1,665.30 - $1,158.00), or $468.28 every 28 days.4 It divided the 28-day 

offset amount to find the daily amount, which it multiplied by the number of days in each period 

January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019, to find the amount that it overpaid appellant for each 

period. OWCP added the amounts for each period and determined that it should have offset 

$67,875.37 from his wage-loss compensation. 

In a preliminary overpayment determination dated May 3, 2019, OWCP notified appellant 

that he had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $67,875.37 because it had 

failed to reduce his wage-loss compensation benefits for the period January 1, 2007 through 

March 30, 2019 by the FERS portion of his SSA age-based retirement benefits without an 

appropriate offset. It further advised him of its preliminary determination that he was without fault 

in the creation of the overpayment. OWCP provided appellant with an overpayment action request 

form and an overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20). Additionally, it notified him 

that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, he could request a telephonic conference, a final 

decision based on the written evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing.

On June 4, 2019 OWCP received an undated letter from appellant which requested an 

extension of time to find counsel to help him complete the Form OWCP-20.5 The reasons 

appellant provided for not completing the Form OWCP-20 were his age, loss of memory, 

medications, and his May 29, 2019 release from the Veteran’s Administration home following an 

April 16, 2019 operation. Appellant also noted that he was moving to Arkansas the next day. On 

the enclosed copy of the preliminary determination, he noted “need help. Also need attorney!” 

Appellant requested that OWCP waive recovery of the overpayment. The enclosed Form OWCP20 was largely incomplete, noting only a checked box marked “No” indicating that appellant did 

not have any of the incorrectly paid checks or payments in his possession.

In a June 11, 2019 notice of telephone call (Form CA-110), OWCP reported that counsel 

called and related that appellant had brought paperwork to him regarding the overpayment. 

Appellant had indicated that OWCP was willing to waive the overpayment if he completed the 

forms and mailed them in. Counsel further noted that appellant was 80 years old, and suffered 

from PTSD. He related that he would submit the form with a cover letter that day.

6

 No additional 

information was received. 

By decision dated June 14, 2019, OWCP finalized the overpayment determination, finding 

that appellant received an overpayment of wage-loss compensation in the amount of $67,875.37, 

for which he was without fault, because he concurrently received SSA age-related retirement 

benefits and wage-loss compensation for the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019

without appropriate offset. It denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment and required recovery 

by deducting $550.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments. 

 

4 The 28-day offset amount is calculated by multiplying the monthly FERS offset amount by 12 and then dividing 

this amount by 13.

5 The Board notes that OWCP failed to retain a photocopy of the envelope in which the letter and appeal form were 

sent, which would bear the postmark. 

6 The Board notes that OWCP, at that time, had not yet received authorization for counsel to represent appellant.
4

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability or death of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the 

performance of his or her duty.7 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive 

compensation. While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, 

pay, or remuneration of any type from the United States.8

Section 10.421(d) of OWCP’s implementing regulations requires OWCP to reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of any SSA age-related retirement benefits that are 

attributable to the employee’s federal service.9 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 states that FECA 

benefits have to be adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA 

benefit earned as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of 

FECA benefits and federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.10

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received a $67,875.37 

overpayment of compensation for the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019 because he 

concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits

without appropriate offset.

In its June 14, 2019 decision, OWCP found that an overpayment of compensation was 

created for the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019. The overpayment was based on 

the evidence received from SSA with respect to age-related retirement benefits paid to appellant

without an appropriate offset. A claimant cannot receive wage-loss compensation and SSA agerelated retirement benefits attributable to federal service for the same period.11

 The information 

provided by SSA indicated that appellant received age-related SSA retirement benefits that were 

attributable to his federal service during the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019. The 

Board therefore finds that an overpayment has been established. 

To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of the SSA age-related retirement 

benefits that were attributable to federal service must be calculated. OWCP received 

documentation from SSA with respect to the specific amount of SSA age-related retirement 

benefits that were attributable to federal service. The SSA provided the SSA rates with FERS, and 

without FERS for specific periods commencing January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019. OWCP 

 

7 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).

8

Id. at § 8116.

9 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see L.W., Docket No. 19-0787 (issued October 23, 2019); S.M., Docket No. 17-1802 

(issued August 20, 2018).

10 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (February 3, 1997); see also L.M., Docket No. 19-1197 (issued January 8, 2020); M.D., 

Docket No. 19-1500 (issued February 24, 2020); N.B., Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019).

11 Id. 
5

provided its calculations for each relevant period based on an SSA worksheet and in its May 3, 

2019 preliminary overpayment determination. No contrary evidence was received.

The Board has reviewed OWCP’s calculation of benefits appellant received for the period 

January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019 and finds that an overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $67,875.37 was created.12

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129 of FECA provides that an individual who is without fault in creating or 

accepting an overpayment is still subject to recovery of the overpayment unless adjustment or 

recovery would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and good conscience.13 

The waiver or refusal to waive an overpayment of compensation by OWCP is a matter that rests 

within OWCP’s discretion pursuant to statutory guidelines.14

Recovery of an overpayment will defeat the purpose of FECA if such recovery would cause 

hardship to a currently or formerly entitled beneficiary because the beneficiary from whom OWCP 

seeks recovery needs substantially all of his or her current income, including compensation 

benefits, to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses, and the beneficiary’s assets do 

not exceed a specified amount as determined by OWCP.15 Additionally, recovery of an 

overpayment is considered to be against equity and good conscience when an individual who 

received an overpayment would experience severe financial hardship in attempting to repay the 

debt or when an individual, in reliance on such payment or on notice that such payments would be 

made, gives up a valuable right or changes his or her position for the worse.16

OWCP’s regulations provide that the individual who received the overpayment is 

responsible for providing information about income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP. 

This information is needed to determine whether or not recovery of an overpayment would defeat 

the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. The information is also used to 

determine the repayment schedule, if necessary.17 Failure to submit the requested information 

within 30 days of the request will result in a denial of waiver of recovery, and no further request 

for waiver shall be considered until the requested information is furnished.18

 

12 M.D., supra note 10; A.S., Docket No. 19-0171 (issued June 12, 2019).

13 5 U.S.C. § 8129; 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.433, 10.434, 10.436, and 10.437; see A.F., Docket No. 19-0054 (issued 

June 12, 2019).

14 A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued February 21, 2019); see Robert Atchison, 41 ECAB 83, 87 (1989).

15 20 C.F.R. § 10.436(a)(b). For an individual with no eligible dependents the asset base is $6,200.00. The base 

increases to $10,300.00 for an individual with a spouse or one dependent, plus $1,200.00 for each additional 

dependent. Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management, Final Overpayment Determinations, 

Chapter 6.400.4(a)(2) (September 2018).

16 Id. at § 10.437(a)(b).

17 Id. at § 10.438(a); M.S., Docket No. 18-0740 (issued February 4, 2019).

18 Id. at § 10.438(b).
6

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.

OWCP found that appellant was without fault in the creation of the overpayment of 

compensation. The fact that a claimant is without fault in the creation of an overpayment does not 

preclude OWCP from recovering the overpayment.19 Waiver is only possible if recovery would 

defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.20 Appellant, however, did 

not provide the requisite financial documentation to OWCP.21

In its preliminary determination dated May 3, 2019, OWCP explained the importance of 

providing the completed Form OWCP-20 overpayment recovery questionnaire and supporting 

financial documentation. It advised appellant that it would deny waiver of recovery if he failed to 

furnish the requested financial information within 30 days. On June 4, 2019 OWCP received a 

Form OWCP-20 that was largely incomplete, noting only a checked box marked “No” indicating 

that appellant did not have any of the incorrectly paid checks or payments in his possession. No 

additional evidence was received prior to OWCP’s June 14, 2019 final overpayment 

determination. OWCP therefore did not have the necessary financial information to determine 

whether waiver of recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be 

against equity and good conscience within 30 days of the preliminary decision.

22

 It was, therefore, 

required to deny waiver of recovery of the overpayment.23

On appeal counsel asserts that on June 11, 2019 he helped appellant with OWCP’s

paperwork, specifically Form OWCP-20, and sent in the same that day. As explained above, 

however, neither a completed Form OWCP-20 nor supporting financial documentation was 

received as of the issuance of OWCP’s June 14, 2019 final overpayment determination. Counsel 

further argues that appellant is entitled to waiver of recovery as he was without fault in the creation 

of the overpayment, as acknowledged in OWCP’s May 3, 2019 correspondence, and appellant had 

acted accordingly. However, as explained above, the fact that he was not at fault does not relieve 

him from liability for repayment of the overpayment of compensation and the Board finds that 

OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3

Section 10.411 of OWCP’s regulations provides in pertinent part:

“When an overpayment has been made to an individual who is entitled to further 

payments, the individual shall refund to OWCP the amount of the overpayment as 

soon as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to same. If no refund 

 

19 See M.D., supra note 10; L.D., Docket No. 19-0606 (issued November 21, 2019); R.B., Docket No. 15-0808 

(issued October 26, 2015).

20 20 C.F.R. § 10.436; J.C., Docket No. 19-0122 (issued June 11, 2019).

21 Id. at § 10.438(b); T.J., Docket No. 19-1242 (issued January 13, 2020).

22 See E.M., Docket No. 19-0857 (issued December 31, 2019).

23 Supra note 18.
7

is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of compensation, taking into account 

the probable extent of future payments, the rate of compensation, the financial 

circumstances of the individual, and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize 

any hardship.”

24

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3

The Board finds that OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$550.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

As discussed, OWCP did not receive a completed overpayment recovery questionnaire or 

any of the necessary financial information to support his income and expenses prior to the final 

June 14, 2019 overpayment decision. The overpaid individual is responsible for providing 

information about income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP.25 When an individual fails 

to provide requested financial information, OWCP should follow minimum collection guidelines 

designed to collect the debt promptly and in full.26 As appellant did not submit the financial 

documentation to OWCP as requested, the Board finds that there is no evidence of record to 

establish that OWCP erred in directing recovery of the $67,875.37 overpayment at the rate of 

$550.00 every 28 days from his continuing compensation payments.

27

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of 

$67,875.37 for the period January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2019 because he concurrently 

received FECA wage-loss compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits without an 

appropriate offset, for which he was without fault. The Board further finds that OWCP properly 

denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment and properly required recovery of the overpayment 

by deducting $550.00 from his continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

 

24 20 C.F.R. § 10.441(a); see G.G., Docket No. 19-0684 (issued December 23, 2019).

25 Id. at § 10.438.

26 E.M., supra note 22; Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, supra note 15 at Chapter 6.500.2 (September 2018).

27 See E.K., Docket No. 18-0587 (issued October 1, 2018).
8

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 14, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: November 19, 2020

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board