alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5035 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5035

  To authorize appropriations for the construction of vessels for the 
Navy and to authorize appropriations for loan guarantees for commercial 
                                vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2010

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize appropriations for the construction of vessels for the 
Navy and to authorize appropriations for loan guarantees for commercial 
                                vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Shipbuilding Budget Policy 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Navy.--Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for each 
of fiscal years 2011 through 2015 for the construction of vessels for 
the Navy to meet the force requirements of the Navy (as described in 
the annual naval vessel construction plan required by section 231 of 
title 10, United States Code) in the amount of $20,000,000,000.
    (b) The Merchant Marine.--Funds are hereby authorized to be 
appropriated for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2015 for loan 
guarantees and commitments authorized under chapter 537 of title 46, 
United States Code, for the construction of new vessels to replace and 
expand the domestic fleet of commercial vessels (as that term is 
defined in that chapter) in the amount of $60,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-76399) pertaining to: the Accredo Health, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and
restated; the Accredo Health, Incorporated 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
and the Accredo Health, Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, of our report
dated August 7, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Accredo Health,
Incorporated.



                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
September 25, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Annual Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


/s/ David D. Stevens


David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
September 13, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACTUAL 
              ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Termination Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned by the 
Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated contractual 
arrangements with the Village.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the termination of an 
easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), 
the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory 
arrangements with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 
Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 511

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 20, 2005 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                                                 
|                         |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer (Chief Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THOMASINE TYNES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 548 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 29, 2004     /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN      President and Director (principal
                   ----------------------     executive officer)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 29, 2004     /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN      President and Director (principal
                   Daniel B. O'Brien          accounting officer)
##### 



Exhibit 10.26
 
 
    
    Target compensation of $120,000 for non-employee directors other than the Chairman and
$180,000 for the non-employee Chairman. Paid 50% in restricted stock and 50% in cash. No
fees for regular board or committee meetings.
    
    Premiums for committee chairs:
    
    - Audit - $20,000
    
    - Other - $ 7,500
    
    Meeting fees for extraordinarily frequent Board meetings (required to consider transactions
or other special circumstances, as determined by the Chairman): $1,000 per meeting. (Note:
Usage of this feature is expected to be extremely infrequent.)
    
    Committee chair fees. The cash portion of target compensation and special meeting fees are
payable in cash quarterly.
    
    Restricted stock will be awarded at beginning of a plan year (commencing with annual
shareholders meeting) and vest at end of plan year. Partial vesting for directors who leave
before their term is up will be at discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board.
    
    Restricted stock will be held in custody by RTI until restriction is terminated and then a
certificate, free of all restrictions, shall be issued in the Grantees name (or a trust as he
or she shall designate). Grantee shall be entitled to vote the restricted stock.
#### Charles E. Dickerman *vs.*Joseph Ashton.

May 17, 1875.

Findings presumed Correct, when Case does not Purport to Contain all the Evidence. — "Where the “statement of the case” does not show that it contains all the evidence on any point, this court presumes that there was sufficient evidence to justify the findings of the court below on the fact.

Agency for Sale of Land Created without Writing. — The authority of an agent to make a contract for the sale of real estate need not be in writing.

Same — Invalid Specialty valid as a Simple Contract. — If a contract which need not be under seal is executed by an agent, having authority to execute simple contracts, but not sealed contracts, and has a seal affixed to it, it will be valid as a simple contract.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the court of common pleas for Ramsey county, *Hall,*J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a trial by the court without a jury.

*Lorenzo Allis,*for appellant.

*Bigelow, Flandrau & GlarJc,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

This is an action to enforce specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. The contract was in writing, and purported to be under the seal of the defendant, the vendor, and was made on his part by an agent, with only oral authority to make it.

The defendant makes the point that the proof of the authority of the agent was not of that clear and satisfactory character which a court of equity will insist upon as to contracts, the specific performance of which is sought. But the ‘ ‘ statement of the case ’ ’ does not show that it contains all the evidence on that point; and where such is the case, this court presumes that there was sufficient evidence to justify the finding of fact of the court below. *Henry*v. *Hinman, ante,*p. 378.

It was decided in *Brown*v. *Eaton, ante,*p. 409, that the authority of an agent to make such a contract need not be in writing.

The defendant objects that the contract is void, because it purports to be a specialty, and that the authority of an *539agent to bind Ms principal by contract under seal must also be under seal. The proposition is true, that an agent, not authorized by deed, cannot execute a contract which shall be valid, as a deed or specialty, against Ms principal. But in such case, if the contract need not be by deed, it will be valid as a simple contract, notwithstanding a seal is attached to it. *Minor*v. *Willoughby,*3 Minn. 225. The order denying a new trial is affirmed.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector

March 31,2005

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2024

NO. 03-23-00486-CR

Jennifer Kay Polson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Jennifer Kay Polson

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows Jennifer 

Kay Polson to withdraw her notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0658

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

COLTER HELTON HENRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0658
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NAT HAN SMITH , Appel lant ,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 1812 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 722

STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Dec ision filed June 2 3 , 2023 Appeal from t he Circuit Court for M ari on County , Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew R. M c Lain, of McLai n Law, P.A. , Longwood, f

or Appellant. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

P E R CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS , EDWARDS and HARRIS , JJ. , concur

.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LYNN LEROY KENNEDY

No. 745SC792

(Filed 20 November 1974)

Crime Against Nature § 1— constitutionality of statute

The crime against nature statute, G.S. 14-177, is not unconstitutionally vague.

Defendant appeals from *Wells, Judge,*13 May 1974 Session of Superior Court held in Pender County. Heard in the Court of Appeals on 21 October 1974.

Defendant was indicted and tried for violating G.S. 14-177, which prohibits crimes against nature. From a verdict of guilty and a sentence of six to ten years in prison, defendant appealed.

*744
      *Attorney General Carson, by Assistant Attorney General Robert G. Webb, for the State. .. "■■■■,*

*Corbett & Fisler, by Leon li. Corbett, Sr., for defendant appellant.*

MARTIN, Judge.

Counsel for defendant admits he is unable to find prejudicial error committed at trial but urges this Court to hold G.S. 14-177 unconstitutionally vague. We have reviewed the record and also find no prejudicial error. Furthermore, we reaffirm *State v. Moles,*17 N.C. App. 664, 195 S.E. 2d 352 (1973) where this Court upheld the validity of G.S. 14-177. In *Perkins v. State of North Carolina,*234 F. Supp. 333 (1964), Chief Judge Craven also upheld the validity of this ! statute against an attack for vagueness by reading the statute in light of North Carolina Supreme Court interpretations thereof.

No error.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Parker concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of China Architectural Engineering, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Luo Ken YiLuo
      Ken YiChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      16, 2010/s/  Gene Michael
      BennettGene
      Michael BennettChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      16, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to China Architectural Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by China
Architectural Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of OtelcoInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|    /s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Curtis L. Garner, Jr.                       |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*                   |   |
| May 9, 2005                                 |   |

 

----
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Riverside, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0827

Issued: August 20, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On May 7, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from an April 21, 2021 decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0827.

In a letter dated July 20, 2021, appellant requested that the appeal be dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-0827 is dismissed.

Issued: August 20, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5183 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 

homebuyer tax credit through December 31, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. BRIGHT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the first-time homebuyer tax credit through December 

31, 2010, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 36(h) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘May 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’. 

8 (b) BINDING CONTRACT EXCEPTION.—Paragraph 

9 (2) of section 36(h) of such Code is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5183 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘May 1, 2010’’ each place it ap2 pears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’, and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2010’’ each place it ap4 pears and inserting ‘‘May 1, 2011’’. 

5 (c) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS ON QUALIFIED

6 OFFICIAL EXTENDED DUTY OUTSIDE THE UNITED

7 STATES.—Paragraph (3) of section 36(h) of such Code 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘May 1, 2010’’ in the matter 

10 preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘January 

11 1, 2011’’, 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘ ‘May 1, 2011’ for ‘May 1, 

13 2010’ ’’ and inserting ‘‘ ‘January 1, 2012’ for ‘Janu14 ary 1, 2011’ ’’, and 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘ ‘July 1, 2011’ for ‘July 1, 

16 2010’ ’’ and inserting ‘‘ ‘May 1, 2012’ for ‘May 1, 

17 2011’ ’’. 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to residences purchased after April 

20 30, 2010. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS