alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

To require certain Internet websites that contain personal information 
   of individual's to remove such information at the request of such 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2010

 Mr. McCotter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require certain Internet websites that contain personal information 
   of individual's to remove such information at the request of such 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cyber Privacy Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF PERSONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OF CERTAIN WEBSITES.

    (a) In General.--Any Internet website that makes available to the 
public personal information of individuals shall--
            (1) provide, in a clear and conspicuous location on the 
        Internet website, a means for individuals whose personal 
        information it contains to request the removal of such 
        information; and
            (2) promptly remove the personal information of any 
        individual who requests its removal.
    (b) Definition of Personal Information.--As used in this Act, the 
term ``personal information'' means any information about an individual 
that includes, at minimum, the individual's name together with either a 
telephone number of such individual or an address of such individual.

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

    (a) Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices.--A violation of this Act 
shall be treated as an unfair and deceptive act or practice in 
violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal 
Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or 
deceptive acts or practices.
    (b) Powers of Commission.--The Federal Trade Commission shall 
enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the 
same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms 
and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et 
seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act. Any person 
who violates such regulations shall be subject to the penalties and 
entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in that Act.
                                 <all>
```
Argued and submitted March 20,

reversed and remanded April 24, 2003

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Shirley J. Pierce, Claimant. Shirley J. PIERCE, *Petitioner, v.*SAIF CORPORATION and Albertina Kerr Centers, *Respondents.*

00-07117; A116962

67 P3d 435

Donald M. Hooton argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Jerome P. Larkin argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *Duarte v. SAIF,*179 Or App 737, 41 P3d 458 (2002).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4934 

To prohibit the enforcement of a climate change interpretive guidance issued 

by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. POSEY (for himself, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. 

SOUDER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. POE of 

Texas, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. PITTS, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

GRIFFITH, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BONNER, Mr. PAUL, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. AKIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the enforcement of a climate change interpretive 

guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maintaining Agency 

5 Direction on Financial Fraud Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE NULL AND VOID. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no inter8 pretive guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4934 IH

1 Commission on or after the effective date of this Act relat2 ing to ‘‘Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Re3 lated to Climate Change’’, affecting Parts 211, 231, and 

4 249 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, (as described 

5 in Commission Release Nos. 33–9106; 34–61469; FR– 

6 82), or any successor thereto, may take effect, and such 

7 guidance shall have no force or effect with respect to any 

8 person on or after February 2, 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.P., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, Orlando, FL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0345

Issued: February 25, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On January 4, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a May 29, 2019 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0345.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the May 29, 2019 decision was November 25, 2019. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until January 4, 2021, more than 180 days after the May 29, 

2019 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0345 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0345 is dismissed.

Issued: February 25, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5098 

To delay the implementation of the licensing requirements under the S.A.F.E. 

Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2010 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To delay the implementation of the licensing requirements 

under the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flexible Licensing 

5 Compliance for Nonprofit Housing Employees Act of 

6 2010’’. 

7 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS. 

8 The Congress finds that— 

9 (1) the United States is experiencing a historic 

10 foreclosure crisis on home mortgages; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5098 IH

1 (2) in the first quarter of 2010, 8,000,000 

2 homes were in the foreclosure pipeline and 

3 27,000,000 households reportedly owed more than 

4 their homes were worth; 

5 (3) nonprofit housing counseling agencies ap6 proved by the Department of Housing and Urban 

7 Development are experiencing an increased demand 

8 for housing counseling services; 

9 (4) housing counselors are facing a growing 

10 need for their foreclosure prevention and home pur11 chasing services; 

12 (5) a decrease in the availability of Federal, 

13 local, and private funds has contributed to reduced 

14 budgets for nonprofit housing counseling agencies; 

15 and 

16 (6) it is estimated that one in four housing 

17 counseling agencies has reduced staff due to budget 

18 shortfalls and, as a result, housing counseling agen19 cies have reduced their hours and turned away cli20 ents. 

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF LICENSING AND REGISTRA22 TION REQUIREMENTS. 

23 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, sections 

24 1504 and 1508 of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act 

25 of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5103, 5107), and any regulations of 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5098 IH

1 the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under 

2 such Act regarding licensing or registration requirements 

3 for engaging in the business of a loan originator shall not 

4 take effect until January 1, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5054 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5054

 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new employees to 
enforce the Federal Government's invasion into the health care lives of 
                           American citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2010

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new employees to 
enforce the Federal Government's invasion into the health care lives of 
                           American citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevent IRS Overreach Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IRS FROM HIRING NEW EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE PATIENT 
              PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND HEALTH CARE AND 
              EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    No position within the Internal Revenue Service may be filled, by 
transfer or any other appointment taking effect on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act, if the duties and responsibilities of such 
position include the enforcement of any provision of, or amendment made 
by, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the Health Care 
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

|   | (1)    | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended                June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the                date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of                the                dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report.                                                                                                               |

| /s/                John Works          |
|----------------------------------------|
| John                Works              |
| Chief                Executive Officer |
| August                8, 2007          |

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2730]


Petitions For Reconsideration Of Action In Rulemaking Proceeding

October 13, 2005.

    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 10, 2005. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Auction of Direct Broadcast Satellite 
Licenses (WT Docket No. 05-251).
    Number Of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-21207 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Keith Walz, Chief Financial Officer of Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

| • | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: May 15, 2006

 

/s/ Keith Walz

Keith Walz

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, C. Dean Metropoulos, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (the“Registrant”), certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 9, 2005         /s/ C. DEAN METROPOULOS              C. Dean Metropoulos
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6979

RONALD K. BILDERBECK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; A. F. BEELER; PETER LIBERO, Doctor; RICHARD SCHOTT; MACK BONNER, Doctor; R. HALL, Doctor; HARRELL WATTS; MS. PAQUARELLE; SAMUEL D. STANLEY, Doctor; K. M. WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03106-H) Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: November 19, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald K. Bilderbeck, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Bilderbeck also seeks on appeal to characterize his negligence claims as state law claims over which the district court had diversity jurisdiction, but because his pleadings in the district court did not adequately assert this ground for relief we do not consider it here. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronald K. Bilderbeck appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). *We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bilderbeck v. Stansberry , No. 5:06-ct-03106-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2006 & Mar. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                                           POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints David Chen and Ronald Gorthuis, jointly and
severally, as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for
him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form
10-QSB and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his
substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934, THIS FROM 10-QSB HAS
BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES
INDICATED:



     SIGNATURE                           TITLE                        DATE
----------------------       ---------------------------        ----------------

  /s/ David Chen             Chief Executive Officer and        October 31, 2005
-------------------------    Director
    David Chen

/s/ Ronald Gorthuis          Chief Financial Officer            October 31, 2005
-------------------------
  Ronald Gorthuis
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES CLARENCE HUFFMAN

No. 7226SC632

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *McLean, Judge,*4 April 1972 Schedule “C” Criminal Session, Mecklenburg Superior Court.

By indictment proper in form defendant was charged with (1) felonious store breaking and (2) felonious larceny. A jury found defendant guilty as charged. From judgment imposing two 10 years prison sentences, sentence in the larceny count to begin at the expiration of sentence in the store breaking count, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Henry T. Rosser, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*John Guerrant Walker for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

Although defendant’s brief does not comply with the rules of this court, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, with particular reference to the questions raised in the brief, but find no prejudicial error. We hold that defendant received a fair trial and the sentences imposed are within the limits provided by applicable statutes. G.S. 14-54; G.S. 14-72; G.S. 14-2.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.