alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-K of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 17, 2007                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
**Exhibit
      32.** **Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of** **Atlantic
      Coast Federal Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002**








Robert
      J.
      Larison, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jon C. Parker, Sr.,
      Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast Federal
      Corporation (the “Company”), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the
      Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and that to the best of his
      knowledge:





-
            the
                report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and-
            the
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
      1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      May
      14, 2007








/s/ Robert J. Larison, Jr.
              Robert J. Larison, Jr.
              President and Chief Executive
                Officer
            
            /s/
                Jon C. Parker, Sr.
              Jon C. Parker, Sr.
              Senior
                Vice-President and Chief Financial
                Officer





28
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5677-5678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the

[[Page 5678]]

nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information 
on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National 
Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 28, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. First Liberty Capital Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan, 
Hugo, Colorado; to acquire an additional 1.65 percent, for a total of 
29.8 percent, of the voting shares of First Liberty Capital 
Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire The First National Bank of 
Hugo, both of Hugo, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 31, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-2097 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Marjorie L. Egelhof, Appellant, *v.*Richard M. Egan, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 2, 1936.

*548
      *Neill Bife [Edward Norwalk*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Burke & Burke [Arthur V. McDermott*of counsel, for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The facts clearly establish that there was no holding over his term by defendant *(Frost*v. *Akron Iron Co.,*1 App. Div. 449, 453; *Byrns*v. *Pierce,*76 Misc. 176), and summary judgment was properly directed in his favor.

Plaintiff brings up for review the order of the court denying retaxation of defendant’s statutory costs taxed at forty-five dollars upon the theory that within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 164 of the Municipal Court Code there was a trial after issue joined, and there a e decisions of the court below sustaining such taxation. *(Arcadia Hosiery Co., Inc.,*v. *Fine,*135 Misc. 663; *Weinberg*v. *Graf,*140 id. 51.)

But in 1930 (Laws of 1930, chap. 432) the Legislature amended section 164 by inserting therein subdivision 3-a providing that Where plaintiff recovers judgment on motion under rule 113 of the, Rules of Civil Practice costs shall be allowed at one-half the rates prescribed in subdivision 1, thus clearly indicating that within the. meaning of section 164 a summary judgment is not to be deemed a judgment after trial. At the time of the amendment rule 113 did not provide for summary judgment in favor of defendant, and there is no provision in the Municipal Court Code expressly regulating costs for defendant upon recovering summary judgment. In the *549light of the amendment embodied in subdivision 3-a it follows that we must resort to subdivision 10 of section 164 to ascertain what costs the defendant is entitled to, that subdivision providing that where no provision for costs is otherwise made the court in its discretion may award a sum not exceeding ten dollars. The statutory costs, therefore, must be reduced from forty-five dollars to ten dollars.

Order denying motion to retax costs reversed, and motion granted to the extent of reducing the allowance of costs to seventeen dollars, and judgment modified accordingly, and as modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs to respondent.

Order of October 8, 1935, affirmed.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10-f-2


Schedule identifying agreements, entered into between Conexant Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") and each of the following persons, substantially identical to
the Employment Agreement constituting Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1998

                                      Name
                                 ---------------

                                Moiz M. Beguwala
                                Lewis C. Brewster
                                 Terry L. Ellis
                                 Raouf Y. Halim
                               Dennis E. O'Reilly
                                  Ashwin Rangan
                                F. Matthew Rhodes
                                 James P. Spoto
                                Thomas A. Stites
                                 Kevin V. Strong
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U. S. C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, George R. Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to mybest knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2)              the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ GEORGE R. VAUGHN    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | George R. Vaughn        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated: August 15, 2005

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and will be retained by VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20564]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps University

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) 
will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects 
of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine 
all aspects of professional military education operations; and provide 
such oversight and advice, as is necessary, to facilitate high 
educational standards and cost effective operations. The Board will be 
focusing primarily on the University's Command and Staff College, 
including its efforts to integrate Arabic language and culture into the 
curriculum for AY05/06. The Board will be apprised of recent 
developments at Marine Corps University, including progress on the 
construction efforts for the National Museum of the Marine Corps. All 
sessions of the meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2005, from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, November 3, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 11:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Marine Corps University in the 
Hooper Room. The address is: Marine Corps University, 2076 South 
Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Lanzillotta, Executive Secretary, 
Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South Street, Quantico, 
Virginia 22134, telephone number 703-784-4037.

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20564 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 
       Representations
 Fees and Expenses




---



##### 



Defined Terms
 Limited Effect
 GOVERNING LAW
 Counterparts




---



##### 



NEW CENTURY FUNDING SB-1By: Christiana Bank & Trust Company, not inits individual capacity but solely as owner trusteeBy:
    
    /s/ James M. YoungName: James M. YoungTitle:   Assistant Vice PresidentCITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.By:
    
    /s/ Bobbie TheivakumaranName: Bobbie TheivakumaranTitle:   Authorized Agent
  NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName: Kevin CloydTitle:   EVPNEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION(f/k/a New Century REIT, Inc.)By:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName: Kevin CloydTitle:   EVPBy:
    
    /s/ Brad A. MorriceName: Brad A. MorriceTitle:   President and CEO
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF  ETS PAYPHONES, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, MICHAEL H. McCLELLAN, am the Chief Financial Officer of ETS Payphones, Inc. (the "Company").

This
certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report").

I
hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:



Dated:
May 13, 2005

| |  | /s/MICHAEL H. MCCLELLANMichael H. McClellan
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ETS Payphones, Inc. and will be retained by ETS Payphones, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of
section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Voyager Oil & Gas Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report
of Voyager Oil & Gas, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Voyager Oil & Gas, Inc. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original
of this statement has been provided to Voyager Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Voyager Oil & Gas, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: August 6, 2012 | /s/ Michael Krzus      
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Michael Krzus          
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |                        
|Date: August 6, 2012 | /s/ Paul Wiesner       
|                     | Paul Wiesner           
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website (r eleased the week prior to October 26, 2021 

### ) The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES : A - 20 - 899 Clement v. Saunders A - 21 - 042 Chaffin v . Chaffin A - 21 - 196 In re Interest of Starlynn F. et al. A - 21 - 302 Rivera v. Ramirez - Franco The above - listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/ . Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/ .
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.P., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, GLENVILLE 

BRATENAHL POST OFFICE, Cleveland, OH, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1119

Issued: August 20, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On July 15, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from an October 23, 2018 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket 

No. 21-1119.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review 

final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 For 

final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the October 23, 2018 decision was April 21, 2019. As appellant did 

not file an appeal with the Board until July 15, 2021, more than 180 days after the October 23,

2018 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-1119 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their 

issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1119 is dismissed.

Issued: August 20, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BOBBY ALLEN, Alias BOBBIE ALLEN

No. 6918SC205

(Filed 28 May 1969)

Appeal by defendant from *Martin (Robert M.), S.J.,*6 January 1969 Session, Greensboro Division, Guilpoed County Superior Court.

*686Bobby Allen, alias Bobbie Allen, (defendant) was charged under a proper bill of indictment with the felonious breaking and entering of a building occupied by A & W Meat Company, Incorporated, in the City of Greensboro, Guilford County; in a second count with the felonious larceny of 840 pounds of beef; and in a third count with the felonious receiving of stolen merchandise knowing same to have been stolen.

On 14 October 1968 Judge Gwyn entered an order adjudging that the defendant was an indigent and appointing counsel to represent him. At the trial the defendant entered a plea of not guilty to each charge. The State introduced evidence which tended to show that, on the night of 6 October 1968, the defendant and three companions went to the building occupied by A & W Meat Company,. Incorporated, on Patton Avenue in Greensboro; they were in an automobile belonging to one of the companions; the automobile was driven to the rear of the building; the defendant got out of the automobile and went to the front of the building; in a short period of time, the building’s rear door opened and the defendant began removing large pieces of beef; this beef was hanging on hooks which were connected to a rail and the defendant pushed the beef out of the rear door by using this rail; the companions then took the beef and placed it in the rear of the automobile; while thus occupied, the lights of a police car were observed in the front of the building, whereupon the defendant and his companions ran from the scene; they were subsequently apprehended by police officers; the three companions told the police officers about the defendant and his implication in the episode; the companions likewise testified in the trial court.

The defendant introduced no evidence. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of the felony of breaking and entering, whereupon the trial judge sentenced him to be imprisoned for a term of not less than five years nor more than seven years in the State Department of Correction. The defendant excepted and appealed to this Court.

Counsel was assigned to the defendant to perfect his appeal, and the county was ordered to pay all necessary expenses in perfecting the appeal.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan and Staff Attorney (Mrs.) Christine Y. Denson for the State.*

*Shreve and Carrington by- Kenneth M. Carrington for defendant appellant.*

*687Campbell, J.

Counsel for defendant candidly and frankly states that he can find no errors committed during the trial.

We have reviewed the record and we find no errors in the trial. The record reveals that the defendant had a fair and impartial trial, and his attorney protected his rights diligently.

Affirmed.

Britt and Morris, JJ., concur.-
STATE of North Carolina v. Shiller Pierre AGUILH, Defendant.

No. COA18-310

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Excellency
Investment Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, David
Mladen, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive, financial, and accounting
officer) of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.




By:    /s/ David Mladen
   -----------------------------------------------
       David Mladen
       Chief Executive Officer (principal
       executive, financial, and accounting officer)
       Dated this 20th day of August, 2007