alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov).*

*Agreement No.:*                     011426-037.                 

*Title:*                     West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     APL Co. Pte Ltd.; CMA CGM, S.A.; Compania Chilena de Navigacion Interoceanica, S.A.; Compania Sudamericana de Vapores, S.A.; Frontier Liner Services, Inc.; Hamburg-Süd KG; King Ocean Services Limited, Inc.; CP Ships USA LLC; Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A.; Seaboard Marine Ltd.; South Pacific Shipping Company, Ltd. (d/b/a Ecuadorian Line); and Trinity Shipping Line.                 

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment makes changes in the manner in which the parties may confer and also clarifies the responsibilities for the payment of any civil penalties.                 

By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: October 7, 2005. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-20522 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Simonds Industries Inc. [the "Company]
DE Corporation:   DOI 05/16/95;  FYE: 12/31

Address:   135 Intervale Road, P.O. Box 500, Fitchburg,
                          Worcester County, Massachusetts  01420

SUBSIDIARIES

1.         Simonds Industries FSC, Inc.
           US Virgin Islands Corporation:  DOI 10/3/88;  FYE: 12/31
           Address:  c/o Chase Trade, Inc.
                     Chase Financial Center
                     11A & 11B Curacao Gade
                     P.O. Box 6220, St. Thomas, VI  00804

2.         Simonds Industries Limited
           UK Corporation:  DOI 3/18/89;  FYE: 12/31;  Reg. No.:  2232753
           Address:  Unit 3 Motorway Industrial Estate
                     Sheffield  ENG  S9 1DH

3.         Simonds Industries Inc.
           Ontario Corporation:  DOI 3/22/88;  FYE: 12/31
           Reg. No.:  765648 (Ontario); A-27480  (BC, 5/24/88)
           Address:  106 East Drive
                     Brampton,  ONT  L6T 1C1

4.         Wespa Metallsagenfabrik Simonds Industries GmbH
           German Corporation:  DOI 11/00/92;  FYE 12/31
           Address:  Postfach 1165
                     34282 Spangenberg, Germany

5.         Strongridge Limited
           Ontario Corporation:  DOI 01/01/95;  FYE 12/31
           Reg. No.: 1111309
           Address:  106 East Drive
                     Brampton, Ontario  L6T 1C1

6.         Armstrong Manufacturing Company
           Oregon Corporation:  DOI 09/23/08;  FYE 12/31
           Address:  2135 NW 21st Avenue
                     Portland, OR  97208


                                      -70-

<PAGE>   2


7.         Simonds UK Holding Limited
           UK Corporation:  DOI 1/18/98;  FYE: 12/31;  Reg. No. 3484408
           Address:  Unit 3 Motorway Industrial Estate
                     Sheffield  ENG  S9 1DH

8.         W. Notting Limited
           UK Corporation:  DOI 5/23/21;  FYE: 12/31  Reg. No. 174839
           Address:  67-75 Garman Road,  Tottenham
                     London  ENG  N17 OUE



W. Notting Limited ("Parent") - Subsidiaries

A.         Notting Sales Limited (England, doi 6/4/68)
           Registration No. 933186
           67-75 Garman Road, Tottenham, London  N17 OUE

B.         Notting Canada Inc. (Ontario, doi 3/9/77)
           Registration No. 354068

C.         Notting America, Inc. (New York, doi 3/26/81)

D.         Servitroquel  S.A. (Spain)

E.         Notting de Mexico S.A. (Mexico)

F.         ComputerCarton Limited (Guernsey)

This is a revised subsidiary list effective as of March 6, 2000.


                                      -71-
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTWOINE GERARD NOLAND, )

DOC #122053, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5466

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 28, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. 

Fernandez, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and David Campbell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Inv. No. 731-TA-663 (Second Review)] 

On October 4, 2005, the Commission unanimously determined that it should proceed to an expedited review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)(B). 

The Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to the notice of institution was adequate. The Commission received responses to the notice of institution from two domestic producers, ACCO Brands USA LLC and Officemate International Corporation. Because the Commission received adequate responses from two producers representing the overwhelming majority of domestic production, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response was adequate. 

                    The Commission did not receive a response from any respondent interested party, and therefore determined that the respondent interested party group response to the notice of institution was inadequate. In the absence of an adequate respondent interested party group response, and any other circumstances that it deemed warranted proceeding to a full review, the Commission determined to conduct an expedited review. A record of the Commissioners' votes is available from the Office of the Secretary and the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.usitc.gov*).                 

By order of the Commission. 
      ( print page 60560)    
Issued: October 12, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05-20798 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans Employment and Training 

The President's National Hire Veterans Committee was established under 38 U.S.C. 4100Public Law 107-288, Jobs For Veterans Act, to furnish information to employers with respect to the training and skills of veterans and disabled veterans, and to the advantages afforded employers by hiring veterans with training and skills and to facilitate the employment of veterans and disabled veterans through participation in Career One Stop National Labor Exchange, and other means. 

The President's National Hire Veterans Committee will meet on Thursday, November 17, 2005 beginning at 1 p.m. in the Board Room of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, 100 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

The committee will discuss raising corporate awareness about the advantages of hiring veterans. 

Individuals needing special accommodations should notify Bill Offutt at (202) 693-4717 by November 10, 2005. 

Signed at Washington D.C., this 19th day of October, 2005. 

Charles S. Ciccolella, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' Employment and Training. 

[FR Doc. 05-21277 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Jack Chen and Klaus Shen, jointly and severally,
as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any
and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-Q and to
file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Form 10-Q has
been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:

<TABLE>
<S>            <C>
      Signature                             Title                           Date

    /s/ Jack Chen           Chief Executive Officer and Director         May 19, 2008
---------------------
      Jack Chen

   /s/ Klaus Shen                  Chief Financial Officer               May 19, 2008
---------------------
     Klaus Shen

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

h0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147828

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147828

COA: 302135

Wayne CC: 10

- 006933

- FC

JAMES ANTHONY TERRELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is consi dered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Allen-Michael GROSS, Defendant.

No. COA18-701

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

G.T., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 

NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION 

SERVICE, Washington, DC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0199

Issued: December 1, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On November 17, 2020 appellant sought an appeal from a purported November 3, 2020 

decision of the Office of Workers’Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0199.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.2 

The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP 

issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal. 3 Although the case record 

does contain a document from OWCP dated November 3, 2020, it is an informational letter and, 

thus, does not constitute a final adverse OWCP decision. As there is no final adverse decision 

1 The Board notes that on May 19, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from an April12, 2021 merit decision of OWCP. 

The Clerk of the Appellate Board docketed that appeal as No. 21-8058. That appeal will be adjudicated separately.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

3

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of OWCP.”
2

issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes 

that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0199 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0199 is dismissed.

Issued: December 1, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000025 12-JUN-2018 09:46 AM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Marc Holliday, Chief Executive Officer of Gramercy, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Gramercy.

 
|               |                    |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               | /s/ Marc Holliday       |   |   |
| Name:              | Marc Holliday           |   |
| Title:             | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               |                    |   |
| July 27, 2005 |                    |
|                    |                         |  |  |  |  |

 

----
**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | (1)    | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended                December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on                the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of                the                dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report.                                                                                                                                  |

----
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector

March 30,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
#### Willie STRODE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-2572

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 1972.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 17, 1972.

*1296David Lipman, Johnnie E. Walls, Jr., Greenwood, Miss., Maureen G. Malone, Oxford, Miss., for petitioner-appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for respondent-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and RO-NEY, Circuit Judges.

*

  Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner incarcerated pursuant to a state conviction. On August 12, 1971 the district court entered an order stating that it was allowing an appeal, which we construe to mean granting a certificate of probable cause under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, stating that it did so because of the policy of this circuit to allow such an appeal regardless of its merit.

There is no such policy of this circuit. Section 2253 provides that an appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas proceeding where the detention is under state process unless the habeas judge or a circuit judge or the circuit justice issues a certificate of probable cause. Implementing this, Rule 22(b), FRAP, provides that if the district court denies a certificate of probable cause the applicant may seek a certificate in the Court of Appeals. In 1970, for example, there were 133 applications for certificates of probable cause in this circuit in cases where certificates had been denied by the district judges. Of these, 112 were denied and 21 were granted.

On December 23, 1971, apparently having become aware that his prior understanding was a misapprehension, the district judge entered an order vacating his grant of a certificate of probable cause. However, by that date the record had been lodged in this court and briefs had been filed and the case was ready for submission. In view of the status of the case and in the interest of judicial administration we treat the revocation of the certificate of probable cause as of no effect and reach the merits. Having considered the merits, the district court’s denial of the writ is affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
**Exhibit 99.2** **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** In connection with the Annual Report of First Place Financial Corp. (“First Place”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Therese A. Liutkus, Chief Financial Officer of First Place, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of First Place.  By: /S/    THERESE A.LIUTKUS          **Therese A. Liutkus****Chief Financial Officer** September 30, 2002