alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Gutierrez, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xerium
Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any
change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
August 11, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas Gutierrez                 
|Thomas Gutierrez                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  I,
James A. Morlan, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ViewSonic
Corporation;
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information
 relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures,
 as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
 in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
 process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
    March
      29,
      2005/s/
      JAMES A. MORLANJames
      A. MorlanChief
      Financial Officer
      (Principal
      Financial Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 21, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00861

- CV

In the Matter of M. L. D., Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES B AKER AND TRI ANA

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed b y the tr i a l court on September 13, 2019

. Appellant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that

the motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the appe al

.

Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs i s made.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Eddie L. Odom, * From the 238th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CV

- 47,186

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00233

- CV * September 26, 2013

Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P.

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Herod )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefor e, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party

incurring the same.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omeros Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Dated: August 10, 2010/s/ Gregory A. DemopulosGregory A. Demopulos, M.D.Principal Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133153 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133153 

 COA: 275523 

Oakland CC: 06-207233-FH 

THERESA ESTELLE JOHNSON,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Halbert WILSON, Appellant.

No. ED 81339.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 22, 2003.

Scott Thompson, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Halbert Wilson, appeals the judgment on his jury conviction for one count of statutory rape pursuant to RSMo section 566.032 (2000) and two counts of statutory sodomy pursuant to RSMo section 566.062. Defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it allowed out-of-court statements made by the victim to be admitted as substantive evidence pursuant to RSMo section 491.075.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in*853formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).
# EXHIBIT 32-2

# Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, James W. Distelrath, Chief
Financial Officer of Clarkston Financial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 which this
          statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
          December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Clarkston Financial Corporation.

Dated: March 15, 2007

| |  | /s/ James W. Distelrath

James W. DistelrathChief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 24.1




POWER OF ATTORNEY




KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jack Chen and Maggie Zhang, jointly and severally, as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him/her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-Q and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Form 10-Q has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:




Signature

Title

Date/s/ Jack Chen

Chief Executive Officer and Director

May 16, 2011Jack Chen/s/ Maggie Zhang

Acting Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2011Maggie Zhang
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Allen D. Brown, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the
Company. /s/ Allen D. BrownAllen D. BrownPresident
 March 17, 2004
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

20 August, 2001


UPC Polska, Inc.                            UPC Polska, Inc.
4643 Ulster Street                          IX p.
Suite 1300                                  ul. Szturmowa 2a
Denver                                      02-678 Warszawa
Colorado 80237                              Poland
USA


Poland Communications, Inc.                 Poland Communications, Inc.
4643 Ulster Street                          IX p.
Suite 1300                                  ul. Szturmowa 2a
Denver                                      02-678 Warszawa
Colorado 80237                              Poland
USA

Attention:  Dorothy Hansberry

SUBORDINATION OF RIGHT TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS UNDER SECURITIES ISSUED PURSUANT TO
THE INDENTURES UPON A LIQUIDATION OF UPC POLSKA, INC.

Reference is made to (i) that certain Indenture dated as of July 14, 1998
between UPC Polska, Inc. (formerly known as @Entertainment, Inc.) (the
"COMPANY") and Bankers Trust Company as trustee (the "TRUSTEE") relating to the
$252,000,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity 14 1/2% Senior Discount
Notes due 2008 and 14 1/2% Series B Senior Discount Notes due 2008, (ii) that
certain Indenture dated as of January 20, 1999 between the Company and the
Trustee relating to the $36,001,321 aggregate principal amount at maturity 7%
Series C Senior Discount Notes due 2008, (iii) that certain Indenture dated as
of January 27, 1999, between the Company and the Trustee relating to the 14 1/2%
Senior Discount Notes due 2009 and the 14 1/2% Series B Senior Discount Notes
due 2009 and (iv) that certain Indenture dated as of October 31, 1996 between
Poland Communications, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company relating to
the 9% Series B Senior Notes due 2003 (collectively, the "INDENTURES").

Capitalized terms used in this letter but not defined herein shall the meanings
ascribed to them in the Indentures.

For such time as any amount remains outstanding under the Qualified Loan
Agreement dated __ August, 2001 between Belmarken Holding B.V. as Lender and the
Company as Borrower (the "QUALIFIED LOAN"), United Pan-Europe Communications
N.V. ("UPC") hereby agrees that upon a liquidation of the Company, UPC's right
to receive any and all payments due to it as a holder of Securities issued
pursuant to the Indentures is

<Page>

subordinated in right of payment to the repayment by the Company of any and all
sums owing by it under the Qualified Loan.

of UPC of all Securities held by UPC pursuant to the Indentures and (d) UPC's
revocation of this letter.

UNITED PAN-EUROPE COMMUNICATIONS N.V.

By:     /s/ TON TUIJTEN                        By:     /s/ GENE MUSSELMAN
       --------------------                        -------------------------

Name:  Ton Tuijten                             Name:   Gene Musselman
Title: Director                                Title:  Director
<PAGE>

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                             UNISYS CAPITAL TRUST I

            The undersigned, being all of the trustees of Unisys Capital Trust I
(the "Trust"), pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section
3801 et seq., HEREBY CERTIFY:

            (a)   The name of the business trust being formed hereby is "Unisys
                  Capital Trust I".

            (b)   The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust that
                  has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware
                  is as follows:

                  HSBC Bank & Trust Company (Delaware), National Association
                  1201 Market Street, Suite 1001
                  Wilmington, Delaware 19801

            (c)   This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
                  filing.

Dated:  March 26, 2002


                                     __________________________________________
                                     Name:  Robert S. Manturuk
                                     Title: Trustee


                                     __________________________________________
                                     Name:  Nancy L. Miller
                                     Title: Trustee


                                     __________________________________________
                                     Name:  Peter S. Noll
                                     Title: Trustee


                                     HSBC Bank & Trust Company (Delaware),
                                     National Association, as Trustee


                                     By:_______________________________________
                                          Name:  J. Anton Bodor
                                          Title: Authorized Signatory
#### STATE of Maine v. Douglas CURTIS.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs March 5, 1991.

Decided April 2, 1991.

R. Christopher Almy, Dist. Atty., Bangor, for the State.

Douglas Curtis, pro se.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and WATHEN, GLASSMAN, COLLINS and BRODY, JJ.

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Douglas C. Curtis appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, *Silsby, J.)*denying his appeal from the judgment of the District Court (Millinocket, *Calkins, C.J.)*convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (Supp.1990). We find no error and affirm.

Defendant’s principal argument on appeal arises from the fact that the court suppressed his answer to a police inquiry as to whether he had been drinking, but then ruled that responses to questions asked *after*this suppressed response were admissible because they were part of a general investigation. The District Court’s finding that defendant was in custody at the time he was asked if he was drinking was not a correct application of the law to the facts of this case. *See State v. Lewry,*550 A.2d 64, 65 (Me.1988); *United States v. Streifel,*781 F.2d 953, 962 (1st Cir.1986); *see, also Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U.S. 436, 477-78, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1629-30, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) (“General on-the-scene questioning as to facts surrounding a crime or other general questioning of the fact-finding process is not affected by our holding”). Defendant takes nothing from this argument.

Defendant argues for the first time on appeal that he was never informed of his right to a jury trial. On the record is a writing signed by the attorney of record waiving defendant’s right to jury trial. *State v. Dube,*409 A.2d 1102, 1104 (1979) (the written waiver of a jury trial signed by the defendant’s attorney is sufficient for a Class D or E charge). “A defendant may challenge a purported waiver of a jury trial on direct appeal only if it is clear on the record of the case that there was no valid waiver of jury trial.” *State v. Mank,*501 A.2d 809, 811 (quoting 1 Cluchey & Seitzinger *Maine Criminal Practice*§ 23.5 at 23-9 (1985)). Defendant, although present throughout the proceedings, never challenged the waiver in the trial court. On this record, it is not clear that there was no waiver of jury trial.

*739Defendant’s remaining arguments concerning the existence of probable cause to support his arrest and the sufficiency of the evidence are without merit.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Private Media Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Berth Milton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan
Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Berth Milton       
|Berth Milton           
|Chief Executive Officer

March 17, 2008

|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Johan Gillborg     
|Johan Gillborg         
|Chief Financial Officer

March 17, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.