alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5169]


Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy; Notice of 
Open Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (ACIEP) 
will meet from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 1, 2005, in 
Room 1205, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The meeting will be hosted by Assistant Secretary of State for 
Economic and Business Affairs E. Anthony Wayne and Committee Chairman 
R. Michael Gadbaw. Topics for the meeting are (1) U.S. Priorities in 
the Doha Development Agenda and (2) Sustainable Energy Development. The 
ACIEP serves the U.S. Government in a solely advisory capacity 
concerning issues and problems in international economic policy.
    This meeting is open to the public as seating capacity allows. 
Entry to the building is controlled and will be facilitated by advance 
arrangements. Members of the public planning to attend should provide, 
by October 26, their name, professional affiliation, social security 
number (or other identification, such as driver's license), date of 
birth, and citizenship to Gwendolyn Jackson by fax (202) 647-5936, e-
mail (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#670d06040c140809000b27141306130249000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abc1cac8c0d8c4c5ccc7ebd8dfcadfce85ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>), or telephone (202) 647-0847.
    For additional information, contact David Freudenwald, Office of 
Economic Policy and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Economic and Business 
Affairs, at (202) 647-2231 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f4e0f7e7f6f7fce5f3fef6f6f8d2e1e6f3e6f7bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315743544455545f46505d55555b7142455045541f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 12, 2005.
Laura Faux-Gable,
Office Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public 
Diplomacy, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-20842 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

March 20, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00542

- CV

Vinod S. IDNANI , Appellant

v.

Mansha V. IDNANI , Appellee
From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016

- CVG

- 001721

- C3 Honorable Ron Carr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER
After we granted two motions for extension of time to file A ppellant’s brief , the brief wa s due on February 28, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On March 9, 2020, after no brief or further motion for extension of time was filed, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by March 19, 2020, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c) ; Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, no pet.)

. On March 19, 2020, Appellant filed the brief and a third motion for an extension of time to file the brief. Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of March, 2020

.___________________________________ Michael A . Cruz , Clerk of Court
Order entered April 2 5 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00131
- CR
TYLON LADARRYL GREER , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 32082

O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. We abated for the appo int m e nt of counsel. On Apr il 19, 2022, a supplemental clerk ’ s record was filed with the trial court ’ s appointment of Jason
Duff. We DIRE CT the Clerk to list Mr. Du ff as counsel of record for appellant

. All future correspondence shall be se nt to Mr. Duff at the address on file with the
C o urt.The clerk ’ s and reporter ’ s rec ords have been filed. We ORDER appellant ’ s

brief due by June 17, 2022

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copie s of this order to t he Honorable Keli
A iken , Presiding Judge, 354th Judici al District Cou rt ; to Jason Duff ; and to the
Hunt County District Attor ney’s Office , Appellate Divisi on
.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Presidential Documents

61013 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 201 

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7946 of October 14, 2005 

National Character Counts Week, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Character Counts Week, we focus on ways to reach out 

to our fellow Americans, especially children. Parents are the first and best 

example of character in a child’s life. By volunteering and performing other 

acts of service in their communities, parents can teach children about the 

good that comes from helping others. By extending a hand to those who 

suffer, parents can demonstrate kindness and compassion and help children 

learn the importance of serving a cause greater than themselves. 

Our schools also play a vital part in providing children with the principles 

they need to grow and succeed. The Department of Education supports 

character education through its Partnerships in Character Education Program. 

During my Administration, over 60 State and local education agencies have 

received funding from the Department of Education to provide programs 

that teach important values to our youth. 

Many citizens around the country are helping in the effort to teach character 

to children. One of the most important ways to contribute is to become 

a mentor. By showing love, support, and compassion, one person can make 

a difference in the life of a child. 

During National Character Counts Week and throughout the year, I encourage 

children and all Americans to make good choices in life, set high standards, 

and serve as leaders. By working together, we can all contribute to a culture 

of good citizenship and responsibility that strengthens our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 16 through 

October 22, 2005, as National Character Counts Week. I call upon public 

officials, educators, librarians, parents, students, and all Americans to observe 

this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–21028 

Filed 8–18–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1958 MIRRA COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT #35 A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MAINE WITH PRINCIPAL OFFICES IN SOUTH BERWICK, MAINE,

Defendant Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge ]

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2001, is corrected as follows: On page 4, line 3, change "a addendum" to "an addendum"
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Irvin E. RichterIrvin E. RichterChairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 6, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-K of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 17, 2007                                                                   
|                                                                                       
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                       
|Dean L. Cash                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
### CONCURRING OPINION

N o. 04

- 11

- 00193

- CV

THE LYND COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 20466

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### C ONCURRING 

### O PINION TO 

### D ENIAL OF 

### A PPELLEE 

### ’ S 

### M OTION FOR 

### E N 

### B ANC



### R ECONSIDERATION

Sitting en banc: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C . Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Concurring opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Dissenting opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice , joined by Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice and

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2012

I vote to deny appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration. However, I believe the

dissent’s analysis has substantial merit. Therefore, I respectfully invite the Texas Supreme Court

to review this court’s opinions and resolve this important question a ffecting Texas jurisprudence.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### Eric BAIME, Appellant, v. Jill L. BAIME, Appellee.

Nos. 4D01-2925, 4D01-4594, 4D02-93.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 2003.

Lisa Marie Macci of Lisa Marie Macci, P.A., and Eric Baime, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Richard G. Bartmon of Law Offices of Bartmon & Bartmon, P.A., for appellee.

SHAHOOD, J.

This appeal concerns the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to the former wife following the court’s denial of the former husband’s petition for modification of child support. We reverse the order and remand for the trial court to make appropriate findings.

The trial court entered an order denying the former husband’s petition for modification, granting the former wife’s motion for fees, and reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount. Following a hearing, the trial court entered a Final Judgment Awarding Fees and Costs, requiring the former husband to pay a total of $44,203.37. It is not apparent from either order that the trial court considered the financial resources of the parties. *See Ondrejack v. Ondrejack,*839 So.2d 867, 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)(The standard for awarding attorneys fees in dissolution cases is the financial need of the requesting party and the financial ability of the other party to pay). The trial court is required to make findings regarding the parties’ respective financial needs and abilities to pay. *See Sumlar v. Sumlar,*827 So.2d 1079, 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Failure to do so requires reversal. *Id.*

In addition, the trial court did not make the requisite findings as to the reasonableness of the fees requested, including the reasonableness of the former wife’s *607attorney’s time and hourly rate. Thus, reversal is required for the court to make these findings as well. *See Saporito v. Saporito,*831 So.2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(reversal required where trial court does not make express findings as to number of hours reasonably expended and hourly rate); *Ard v. Ard,*765 So.2d 106, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(holding that even where there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support an award of attorney’s fees to the wife, the trial court must make factual findings with regard to the total number of hours expended by the wife’s attorney, the hourly rate, or the reasonableness of the fee).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Presidential Documents 61019 

Proclamation 7949 of October 14, 2005 

White Cane Safety Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Americans who are blind or visually impaired are valuable and contributing 

members of our society, and many use a white cane to help them succeed 

at school, home, or work. White canes give these individuals greater mobility 

and enable them to participate in more aspects of community life. On 

White Cane Safety Day, we celebrate the progress that has been made for 

those who are blind or visually impaired, and we reaffirm our commitment 

to ensuring that these citizens can live and work with greater freedom 

and independence. 

One of our Nation’s defining values is compassion, and we must make 

certain that all our citizens are able to harness their talents, engage in 

productive work, and participate fully in society. My Administration is 

working to fulfill this goal for individuals with disabilities through the 

New Freedom Initiative. This comprehensive program helps increase the 

development and use of assistive and universally designed technologies, 

expand educational and employment opportunities, and improve access into 

daily community life. By working to reduce barriers and change old ways 

of thinking, we can help ensure that our Nation’s opportunities are more 

accessible to all. 

The Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88–628) approved on October 

6, 1964, as amended, has designated October 15 of each year as ‘‘White 

Cane Safety Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2005, as White Cane Safety 

Day. I call upon public officials, business leaders, educators, librarians, 

and all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate 

ceremonies, activities, and programs. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–21031 

Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Todd William Barr

, * From the 42nd District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 24291A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00184

- CR * June 13, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of AKI,  Inc.  on Form 10-K for the
period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, William J. Fox and Kenneth A. Budde, the
Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer,  respectively,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of AKI, Inc.


/s/ William J. Fox
---------------------------
William J. Fox
Chief Executive Officer
September 24, 2003


/s/ Kenneth A Budde
--------------------------
Kenneth A. Budde
Chief Financial Officer
September 24, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Redzep Paljevic et al., Respondents, v WFC Tower D Company, Respondent, and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Sued Herein as Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc., Doing Business as Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. ISS Cleaning Services Group, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 582]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 1, 1999, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order of the same court, dated August 26, 1999, denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims and counterclaims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiffs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court correctly determined that a triable issue of fact was raised in opposition to its prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims and counterclaims insofar as asserted against it *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion. Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### CITY OF GREENSBORO v. KYLE H. HARRIS and wife, FRANCES S. HARRIS; ROY M. BOOTH, Trustee; GEORGE E. MILLER, Mortgagee

No. 7518DC643

(Filed 19 November 1975)

Municipal Corporations § 26 — special assessments — interest

Where a city council resolution confirmed assessments against defendants’ property and provided that the assessments would bear *586interest of 6% and would be held in abeyance until the affected property was annexed by the city, the city was entitled to recover interest at 6% on the delinquent assessments from the date the property was annexed by the city. G.S. 160A-233(a).

Appeal by plaintiff from *Haworth, Judge.*Judgment entered 28 April 1975 in District Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 14 November 1975.

*Jesse L. Warren, City Attorney, by James W. Miles, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for 'plaintiff appellant.*

*Booth, Fish, Simpson & Harrison, by Roy M. Booth, for defendant appellee.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

This appeal involves an action by the City to recover for certain assessments against property. owned by defendant and annexed on 29 June 1969. Judgment was entered in favor of the City for the base amount of the assessment accounts, but the court expressly held that the City was not entitled to interest upon the accounts.

The City Council, by resolution of 19 November 1962, confirmed the assessments against the property, provided that the assessments would bear interest at six percent per annum, and provided further that the assessments be held in abeyance until such time as the City annexed the property.

Defendant’s brief stipulates that it was error for the court to refuse plaintiff the recovery of interest on the delinquent assessment accounts from 29 June 1969 to 8 April 1975. (G.S. 160A-233 (a)).

Judgment is hereby modified to allow plaintiff to recover interest at the rate of six percent per annun from 29 June 1969 to 8 April 1975.

Modified and affirmed.

Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.