alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 21, 2020

NO. 03-19-00861-CV

In the Matter of M. L. D., Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 13, 2019. Appellant 

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### ROBERT EUGENE HELMS v. JAMES BURNELL RORIE

No. 7120DC34

(Filed 24 February 1971)

Appeal by defendant from *Crutchfield, District Judge,*20 July 1970 Session, Union County District Court.

This case arose out of a collision which occurred on Johnson Street in the City of Monroe on 7 September 1968. Plaintiff contends that his vehicle was damaged in the amount of $500.00 when struck by the vehicle of the defendant. Issues of negligence and contributory negligence were answered in favor of the plaintiff, and plaintiff was awarded damages in the amount of $380.00. Defendant appealed.

*James E. Griffin for plaintiff appellee.*

*Griffin and Clark by C. Frank Griffin for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

Since there must be a new trial, we will avoid further discussion of the facts except to say that the trial judge did not commit error when he declined to enter a directed verdict against the plaintiff.

*544The other assignments of error are directed to the charge of the court to the jury. Counsel for the appellee candidly concedes that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in his charge to the jury. With this we are in full accord. In numerous instances the court failed accurately to state principles of law which were involved in the case, a seriatim discussion of which would neither be practical nor of benefit to the bench and bar.

New trial.

Judges Brock and Morris concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph L. Billhimer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Premier
      Entertainment Biloxi LLC and Premier Finance Biloxi Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrants
      and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including
      their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
      those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
      being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants' internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants'
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5.    The registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants'
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal
      control over financial reporting.


Date: May 12, 2006


/s/ Joseph L. Billhimer
-----------------------------------------
Joseph L. Billhimer
President and Chief Operating Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. J. R. HENDERSON

No. 7416SC179

(Filed 20 March 1974)

On *certiorari*to review the order of *McLellcmd, Judge,*at the March 1973 Criminal Session of Robeson Superior Court.

Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 March 1974.

The defendant was indicted for common law robbery. The State’s evidence tended to show that on the morning of 30 December 1972, at about 6:30 o’clock a.m., the defendant, J. R. Henderson, struck Leonard Carter, the operator of the Direct Service Station at East Second and Grace Streets in Lumberton, North Carolina, on the head from behind with an Ajax can. The defendant struck Carter in the face several times with his fists. The defendant removed a roll of money from Carter’s pocket which Carter had from the operation of the service station; but, in the ensuing struggle, the money was knocked to the floor. Both men grabbed at the money on the floor, and the defendant made off with a handful of bills which Carter estimated to be thirteen dollars. From a verdict of guilty as charged and a sentence of not more than five nor less than eight years in the State Prison, the defendant, in open court, appealed.

*156
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorneys General Donald A. Davis and James Blackburn for the State.*

*Lee & Lee by W. Osborne Lee, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This case presents only the face of the record for review.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Baley concur.
#### The State *vs.*John McDowell.

*Count stricken out of indictment as not sufficiently specific—Evidence.*

*(September 23, 1897)*

LbRE, C. J., and Grubb and Pennewill, J- J-, sitting.

*R. C.*White, Attorney-General, for the State.

*Herbert H. Ward*for the Defendant.

Court of General Sessions, New Castle County,

September Term, '1897.

The defendant in the above stated case was indicted for being concerned in interest in lottery policy writing. The indictment contained four counts, the first of which was as follows :

“ That John McDowell late of Wilmington Hundred, in the County aforesaid, on the thirtieth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six with force and arms at Wilmington Hundred, in the County aforesaid, unlawfully was concerned in interest in lottery policy writing ; against the form of an act of the General Assembly in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State.”

*3
      *Mr. Ward*moved the Court that the above count be stricken out as not being sufficiently specific to inform the accused of the nature and character of the offense charged ; contending that it followed the language of the statute under which the indictment was found *(Rev. Code p. 969),*but did not enumerate the ele-, ments constituting the misdemeanor charged. That it did not aver any substantive offense, but embodied only a description of the offense.

*Mr. White*contended that the indictment was in the usual form ; that the count sufficiently informed the accused of the nature of the accusation, in that it set out the business of lottery policy writing, and that it was analogous to following any business without a license where license was required.

Lore, C. J:—

This is an offense which embraces a number of elements. In the first count there are no elements of the offense set out, such as are required to be specified in order to advise the defendant specifically of what fie is to meet. It has been decided in this Court again and again that where the crime embraces a number of elements, those elements must be specified.

We therefore order that the first count be stricken out.

At the trial, it having been testified by some of the witnesses for the defence, that on the morning of November 30, 1896, the defendant was seen by them at a different place from that where the alleged offense was committed, and that on that day a raid was made on several polcy writers’ places by the police,

*Mr. Ward*asked the witness John F. Dolan the following question:

“ Upon the thirtieth day of November, 1896—-the day it has been testified that a raid was made on mo French Street—were there not other policy writers’ places raided by the police? ”

*Mr. White*objected to the question as irrelevant.

*Mr.*Ward:—I offer this testimony to identify the day for which I have proved an *alibi*for the defendant.

Lore, C. J:—

A majority of the Court (consisting of Grubb and Pennewill, J. J.,) think it is admissible.

Grubb, J:—

It is admitted on the ground that it is relevant to the establishment of the defense of *alibi.*
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129466 Marilyn Kelly & (59) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices EUGENE ROBRAHN and CHRISTINE ROBRAHN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 129466 COA: 256083 Kent CC: 02-004158-NS

v
ERIC SCOTT JOHNSON, Defendant,

and

RFN GROUP, INC., d/b/a MARGARITA GRILL, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the August 30, 2005 ord er of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented should now be reviewe d by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., not participating.

l1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4729 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4729

 To clarify the situations in which a corporation may be treated as a 
                       person under Federal law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2010

Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition 
  to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the situations in which a corporation may be treated as a 
                       person under Federal law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CORPORATION AS A PERSON.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in this section, a corporation 
shall not be considered a person under Federal law for any purpose, 
including voting, running for office, or donating funds to a political 
candidate.
    (b) Exclusive List of Laws Applicable to Corporations.--A 
corporation shall be considered a person under Federal law only for the 
purposes of--
            (1) exercising rights to due process;
            (2) participating in any manner of a civil action;
            (3) participating in a contract;
            (4) the right to own property; or
            (5) the ability to declare bankruptcy.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

 Mr. Costello introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACTUAL 
              ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Termination Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned by the 
Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated contractual 
arrangements with the Village.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the termination of an 
easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), 
the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory 
arrangements with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 
Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with the Form 10-Q of Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Alex
      Kam


-------------------------------


Alex
      Kam


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


(
      principal executive officer)





Date:
      August 13, 2008








/s/
      Pan-Rong Liu


-------------------------------


Pan-Rong
      Liu


Chief
      Financial Officer


(principal
      financial officer and principal accounting officer)





Date:
      August 13, 2008








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Madison Avenue Holdings,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Houston, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-1161

Issued: November 30, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On May 15, 2020 appellant filed a timely appeal from a May 12, 2020 merit decision of

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 20-1161.

In a letter dated November 8, 2020 and received November 20, 2020, appellant requested 

that the appeal be dismissed so that she may pursue a request for reconsideration with OWCP.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 20-1161 is dismissed.

Issued: November 30, 2020

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61249-61250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21236]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

[[Page 61250]]


DATE AND TIME: Monday, October 31, 2005, 2 p.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20425, Via Teleconference, Public Call-In number: 1-800-
377-4872, Access Code Number: 45318301, Federal Relay Service: 1-800-
877-8339.

STATUS: 

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of October 7, 2005, Meeting
III. State Advisory Committees Issues
    <bullet> Working Group on SAC Reform
IV. Future Agenda Items

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Dickerson, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8582.

Kenneth L Marcus,
Staff Director, Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-21236 Filed 10-19-05; 3:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
Exhibit 10.4

      Wells Fargo Bank West, National Association             Credit Agreement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


March 20, 2001



Medgrup Corporation
1824 Woodmoor Drive Suite 102
Monument, CO 80132

Dear Sir:

Wells  Fargo  Bank West,  National  Association  ("Lender"),  agrees to lend you
("Borrower")  the amount of $250,000.00,  with a maturity date of March 20, 2002
("Loan"), in accordance with the following terms and provisions.  This letter is
to be read in conjunction with the promissory note, security agreement,  deed of
trust,  and other  documents  executed  in  connection  with the Loan (the "Loan
Documents").

This letter applies to all other obligations,  debts and liabilities of Borrower
to Lender (the  "indebtedness");  whether  now or  hereafter  existing,  whether
Borrower may be liable individually or jointly with others, whether Borrower may
be obligated as guarantor, surety or otherwise.

The  purpose  of  this  letter  is to set out  some  requirements  that  are not
discussed in the Loan Documents.  Until such time as the  Indebtedness is repaid
in full,  you  agree to the  following.  Failure  to comply  with the  following
provisions may result in our declaring an event of default. Our remedies,  if an
event of default is declared, are set out in the Loan Documents.

     1.   Annual business tax returns and CPA prepared financials.
     2.   Annual current personal financial statement and personal tax returns.

If the terms of this letter are  agreeable  to you,  please  indicate by signing
below.

Sincerely yours,
Wells Fargo Bank West, National Association


By: /s/ Greg Welch
   ---------------
Greg Welch
Business Banking Officer


ACCEPTANCE:
The terms of the foregoing letter are hereby accepted:

Medgrup Corporation


By: /s/ William Cronin
   ------------------------
Title:  William Cronin, CEO
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report), I, John Fanelli III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



/s/ John Fanelli IIIJohn Fanelli IIISenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: August 6, 2010
#### In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST James J. BOYD, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 1039x.

No. A03-676.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Sept. 5, 2003.

ORDER

On July 16, 2003, this court suspended respondent James J. Boyd from the practice of law for a period of six months with all but 30 days stayed. The order provided for reinstatement by affidavit under Rule 18(f), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed with *425this court an affidavit certifying that respondent has filed an affidavit of compliance indicating that respondent has complied with the suspension order, that respondent is current with continuing legal education requirements, and that the Director does not object to reinstatement.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent James J. Boyd is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota effective immediately and is placed on probation subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the July 16, 2003, order. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice