Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2005N-0396]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency.  Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), Federal agencies are required to 
                        ( print page 61454)
                        publish notice in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice.  This notice solicits comments on the information collection contained in the guidance for industry on formal dispute resolution for appeals above the division level.
 DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of information by December 23, 2005.
 ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information to: 
                        *http://www.fda.gov/​dockets/​ecomments*.  Submit written comments on the collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD  20852.  All comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.  “Collection of information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party.  Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,  before submitting the collection to OMB for approval.  To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document. With respect to the following collection of information, FDA invites comments on:   (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the Division Level   (OMB Control Number 0910-0430)—Extension This information collection approval request is for an FDA guidance on the process for formally resolving scientific and procedural disputes in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) that cannot be resolved at the division level.  The guidance describes procedures for formally appealing such disputes to the office or center level and for submitting information to assist center officials in resolving the issue(s) presented.  The guidance provides information on how the agency will interpret and apply provisions of the existing regulations regarding internal agency review of decisions (21 CFR 10.75), dispute resolution during the investigational new drug (IND) process (21 CFR 312.48), and the new drug application/abbreviated new drug application (NDA/ANDA) process (21 CFR 314.103).  In addition, the guidance provides information on how the agency will interpret and apply the specific Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goals for major dispute resolution associated with the development and review of PDUFA products. Existing regulations, which appear primarily in parts 10, 312, and 314 (21 CFR parts 10, 312, and 314), establish procedures for the resolution of scientific and procedural disputes between interested persons and the agency, CDER, and CBER.  All agency decisions on such matters are based on information in the administrative file (§ 10.75(d)).  In general, the information in an administrative file is collected under existing regulations in parts 312 (OMB control number 0910-0014), 314 (OMB control number 0910-0001), and part 601 (21 CFR part 601) (OMB control number 0910-0338), which specify the information that manufacturers must submit so that FDA may properly evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drugs and biological products.  This information is usually submitted as part of an IND, NDA, or biologics license application (BLA), or as a supplement to an approved application.  While FDA already possesses in the administrative file the information that would form the basis of a decision on a matter in dispute resolution, the submission of particular information regarding the request itself and the data and information relied on by the requestor in the appeal would facilitate timely resolution of the dispute.  The guidance describes the following collection of information not expressly specified under existing regulations:  The submission of the request for dispute resolution as an amendment to the application for the underlying product, including the submission of supporting information with the request for dispute resolution. Agency regulations (§§ 312.23(d), 314.50, 314.94, and 601.2) state that information provided to the agency as part of an IND, NDA, ANDA, or BLA is to be submitted in triplicate and with an appropriate cover form.  Form FDA 1571 must accompany submissions under INDs and Form FDA 356h must accompany submissions under NDAs, ANDAs, and BLAs.  Both forms have valid OMB control numbers as follows:  FDA Form 1571, OMB control number 0910-0014, expires January 31, 2006; and FDA Form 356h, OMB control number 0910-0338, expires August 31, 2005. In the guidance document, CDER and CBER ask that a request for formal dispute resolution be submitted as an amendment to the application for the underlying product and that it be submitted to the agency in triplicate with the appropriate form attached, either Form FDA 1571 or Form FDA 356h.  The agency recommends that a request be submitted as an amendment in this manner for two reasons:  To ensure that each request is kept in the administrative file with the entire underlying application, and to ensure that pertinent information about the request is entered into the appropriate tracking databases.  Use of the information in the agency's tracking databases enables the appropriate agency official to monitor progress on the resolution of the dispute and to ensure that appropriate steps will be taken in a timely manner. CDER and CBER have determined, and the guidance recommends, that the following information should be submitted to the appropriate center with each request for dispute resolution so that the center may quickly and efficiently respond to the request:  (1) A brief but comprehensive statement of each issue to be resolved, including a description of the issue, the nature of the issue (i.e., scientific, procedural, or both), possible solutions based on information in the administrative file, whether informal dispute resolution was sought prior to the formal appeal, 
                    ( print page 61455)
                    whether advisory committee review is sought, and the expected outcome;  (2) a statement identifying the review division/office that issued the original decision on the matter and, if applicable, the last agency official that attempted to formally resolve the matter;  (3) a list of documents in the administrative file, or additional copies of such documents, that are deemed necessary for resolution of the issue(s); and (4) a statement that the previous supervisory level has already had the opportunity to review all of the material relied on for dispute resolution.  The agency suggests submitting the following information with a formal request for dispute resolution:  (1) Statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with a dispute, (2) brief statements describing the history of the matter, and (3) the documents previously submitted to FDA under an OMB approved collection of information. Based on FDA's experience with dispute resolution, the agency expects that most persons seeking formal dispute resolution will have gathered the materials listed previously when identifying the existence of a dispute with the agency. Consequently, FDA anticipates that the collection of information attributed solely to the guidance will be minimal. Respondents are expected to be sponsors, applicants, or manufacturers of drug or biological products regulated by the agency under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) who request formal resolution of a scientific or procedural dispute. Provided below is an estimate of the annual reporting burden for requests for dispute resolution.  Based on data collected from review divisions and offices within CDER and CBER, FDA estimates that approximately eight sponsors and applicants (respondents) submit requests for formal dispute resolution to CDER annually and approximately one respondent submits requests for formal dispute resolution to CBER annually. The total annual responses are the total number of requests submitted to CDER and CBER in 1 year, including requests for dispute resolution that a single respondent submits more than one time.  FDA estimates that CDER receives approximately 10 requests annually and CBER receives approximately 1 request annually.  The hours per response are the estimated number of hours that a respondent would spend preparing the information to be submitted with a request for formal dispute resolution in accordance with this guidance, including the time it takes to gather and copy brief statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with the dispute, brief statements describing the history of the matter, and supporting information that has already been submitted to the agency.  Based on experience, FDA estimates that approximately 8 hours on average would be needed per response.  Therefore, FDA estimates that 88 hours will be spent per year by respondents requesting formal dispute resolution under the guidance. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: **Table 1.—Estimated Annual Reporting Burden**1
Requests for Formal Dispute Resolution
No. of 
                             Respondents
Number of Responses 
                             per Respondent
Total Annual 
                             Responses
Hours per 
                             Response
Total HoursCDER
8
1.25
10
8
80CBER
1
1
1
8
8Total
881
                        There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
 Dated: October 17, 2005. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 05-21156 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-S