alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

137824 (14) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

JEROME DOWE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137824 

 COA: 286447 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $62.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$313.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2008 

Clerk
ERICK LORRAY 

ARMSTRONG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1685

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 18, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Elijah Smiley, Judge.

Erick Lorray Armstrong, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Northern Star Financial, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald W. Eick,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and I, Thomas P. Stienessen, ChiefExecutive Officer and President, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By     | /s/  Thomas P. Stienessen                |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Thomas  P. Stienessen, CEO and President |
|   |   | Northern  Star Financial, Inc.           |
|   |   | September 16,  2004                 |
|   |   |                                     |
|   | By     | /s/  Gerald W. Eick                      |   |
|   |   | Gerald  W. Eick, CFO and Treasurer       |
|   |   | Northern  Star Financial, Inc.           |
|   |   | September 16,  2004                 |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NorthernStar Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Northern Star Financial, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### IN THE MATTER OF DEBBIE DOWELL

No. 7217DC714

(Filed 20 December 1972)

Infants § 10 — delinquent child — violation of probation condition that she attend school

The evidence was sufficient to support the court’s determination that respondent was a delinquent child in that she had violated the conditions of her probation by failing to attend school.

Appeal by respondent from *Harris, District Judge,*19 July 1972 Session of District Court held in SURRY County.

On 21 April 1972, after notice and hearing, an order was entered which adjudged and decreed that respondent was an undisciplined child. The adjudication was based on findings that the juvenile, a female, stayed out of school for a great portion of time for many months and that she misled her mother as to her school attendance. Respondent was placed on probation under the supervision of the school attendance officer subject to the condition that she attend school every day that she was physically able to attend. No exceptions were taken to this order.

On 19 July 1972, Judge Harris signed an order wherein he adjudged respondent to be a delinquent child in that she had violated the conditions of her probation by failing to attend school. She was ordered to be committed to the custody of the “Board of Youth Development.” The order was entered after a hearing at which respondent was represented by court appointed counsel. The court’s findings were based on evidence which tended to show that respondent had failed to attend school for a single day after the signing of the order of 21 April 1972, that she was, on several occasions, observed in downtown Mount Airy during school hours and that she was observed out at extremely late hours for a girl of her age.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by R. S. Weathers,*As*sistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Carl E. Bell for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

Respondent contends that the court erred in its finding of facts and entry of the order. We hold that the evidence was *135sufficient to support the court’s findings that respondent violated the terms of her probation. A “Delinquent Child” includes any child who has violated the condition of probation. G.S. 7A-278(2). The order from which respondent appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges Hedrick and Graham concur.
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Cuniff, Appellant, *v.*Cavell.

*129Submitted November 18, 1957.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.

*Edward Cuniff,*appellant, in propria persona.

*William Claney Smith,*Assistant District Attorney, with him *Edward C. Boyle,*District Attorney, for appellee.

January 21, 1958:

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This appeal is from the dismissal by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County of relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Relator was indicted on September 6, 1955, at No. 13, September Sessions, 1955, in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Allegheny County on the charge of burglary. On October 20, 1955, on motion of the district attorney a nolle prosequi was entered on the indictment. On January 5, 1956, on motion of the district attorney the order was vacated and the proceedings on the original bill were revived. On March lá, 1956, while represented by counsel, relator pleaded guilty to the burglary charge and was sentenced for a term of not less than two years nor more than four years in the Western State Penitentiary.

*130At the same time, relator entered pleas of guilty to indictments at Nos. 61 and 62, March Sessions, 1956, in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County charging forgery and fraudulently uttering a forged instrument. He was sentenced for terms of not less than two years nor more than four years on each indictment, the same to run. concurrently. However, sentence on bill No. 61 was to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed at No. 13, September Sessions, 1955. On December 7, 1956, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus; he has appealed from the dismissal of his petition.

Relator endeavors to make an issue on the competency of his counsel.

It was permissible to cancel the nolle prosequi entered on the indictment for burglary at No. 13, September Sessions, 1955, and revive the proceedings on that bill. *Com. v. McLaughlin,*293 Pa. 218, 223, 142 A. 213.

In the indictments at Nos. 61 and 62, March Sessions, 1956, relator was charged with forging written instruments and fraudulently uttering forged instruments. Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §1014, 18 PS §5014.

Relator’s contention that he should have been charged with issuing worthless checks under section 854 of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS §4854, is without merit. The indictments charge the crimes in conformity with the statute.' : It follows that relator’s complaint that his counsel was-negligent or incompetent in allowing him to plead guilty- on the indictments is likewise devoid of merit.

On the present record there were no factual issues to be resolved and the dismissal of relator’s petition without a hearing was proper. *Com. ex rel. Scheid v. Day,*181 Pa. Superior Ct. 39, 121 A. 2d 898.

*131The order of the court below dismissing relator’s petition is affirmed.
Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 Jurisdiction ofIncorporationEntity name, location and ownership
    
    or OrganizationA.Issuer and Parent CompanyFirst Place Financial Corp.
    
    DelawareWarren, OhioB.Bank and Bank-Owned Subsidiaries of Issuer1. First Place Bank
    
    FederalWarren, OhioFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%a. Western Reserve Mortgage Corp. (inactive)
    
    OhioWarren, OhioFirst Place Bank owns 100%b. Ardent Service Corp.
    
    OhioWarren, OhioFirst Place Bank owns 100%2. Ohio Central Savings
    
    FederalDublin, OhioFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%Merged with First Place Bank on July 11, 2008C.Financial Service Subsidiaries of Issuer1. First Place Holdings, Inc.
    
    OhioBoardman, OhioFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%a. First Place Insurance Agency, Ltd.
    
    OhioBoardman, OhioFirst Place Holdings, Inc. owns 100%b. Coldwell Banker First Place Real Estate, Ltd.
    
    OhioBoardman, OhioFirst Place Holdings, Inc. owns 100%(i). First Place Referral Network, Ltd.
    
    OhioBoardman, OhioColdwell Banker First Place Real Estate, Ltd. Owns 100%c. APB Financial Group. Ltd.
    
    PennsylvaniaWarrendale, PennsylvaniaFirst Place Holdings, Inc. owns 100%d. American Pension Benefits, Inc.
    
    PennsylvaniaWarrendale, PennsylvaniaFirst Place Holdings, Inc. owns 100%




---



##### 



Jurisdiction ofIncorporationEntity name, location and ownership
    
    or Organizatione. Title Works Agency, LLC
    
    OhioBoardman, OhioFirst Place Holdings, Inc. owns 75%2. First Place Capital Trust
    
    DelawareWilmington, DelawareFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%3. First Place Capital Trust II
    
    DelawareWilmington, DelawareFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%4. First Place Capital Trust III
    
    DelawareWilmington, DelawareFirst Place Financial Corp. owns 100%
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).                    

*Date/Time:*                         November 17, 2005; 1 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (EST). November 18, 2005; 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. (EST).                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 555-II.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Ann Birchett, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8100.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's business operations.                    

*Agenda: November 17, 2005:*

PM: Welcome and Introduction of new members; Updates—Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management, Office of Information and Resource Management, Chief Information Officer activities. Presentation and Discussion—NSF Strategic Planning.

*November 18, 2005:*

AM: Review of Facilities Subcommittee meeting. Presentation and Discussion—Grants Management Line of Business, Center of Excellence; Meeting with NSF Director; Committee Discussion; Planning for next meeting; feedback; other business.

Dated: October 18, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-21071 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmen G. SALAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon Menchaca ALBIDREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Elfego CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 71-2815 to 71-2817.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1972.

John N. Politis, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant Salas.

Kevin J. Mclnerney, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant Albidrez.

Frank V. Gregoreich, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant Cruz.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellants, Salas, Albidrez and Cruz are before this court by way of consolidated appeals from judgments convicting them of smuggling and transporting six ounces of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174.

The testimony which convicted them was largely that of Phillips, an accomplice, but her testimony is amply supported by the acts of the appellants, and the circumstantial evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Glasser v. United *1289States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942), we hold that the trier of fact could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellants had aided and abetted in the commission of the crime. United States v. Nelson, 419 F. 2d 1237, 1243-1245 (9th Cir. 1969).

The other arguments of appellants are that hearsay testimony was possibly used before the grand jury; that the court did not give an unrequested limiting instruction, which appellants did not establish was prejudicial; and that the grand jury proceedings were not transcribed, although there was no prior request to do so. None is meritorious and they do not warrant reversal. United States v. Costello, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Thoreson, 428 F.2d 654, 655-656 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Johnson, 415 F.2d 653, 655 (9th Cir. 1969); Loux v. United States, 389 F.2d 911, 916 (9th Cir. 1968).

The judgments are affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SIMER SINGH,

Appellant,

v.

TRINITY MARKETING &

DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 11

- 00016

- CV

Appeal from the

342nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 342

- 248468

- 10)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and her sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 3.5, on the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013.

GUADAL UPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy K
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:  February 21, 2007

   /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
 Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry

Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
April 3, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.H., A CHILD

NO. 14-13-00006-CV 

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed, October 8, 2012, was heard 

on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the 

judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and 

REMAND the cause for proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion. We 

further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellees,

Jennifer Kegresse and Daniel Eugene Higgins, jointly and severally. We further 

order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
<Table>
<Caption>
Name                                                      State of Incorporation
----                                                      ----------------------
<S>                                                         <C>
Blue Falcon Forge, Inc.                                          Pennsylvania
The Clancy Bing Company                                          Pennsylvania
Park-Ohio Products, Inc.                                              Ohio
General Aluminum Mfg. Company                                         Ohio
Control Transformer, Inc.                                             Ohio
FECO, Inc.                                                          Illinois
ILS Technology, LLC                                                   Ohio
Integrated Holding Company                                            Ohio
Integrated Logistics Company of Canada                            Nova Scotia
Integrated Logistics Holding Company                                  Ohio
Integrated Logistics Solutions, Inc.                                  Ohio
Integrated Logistics Solutions LLC (1)                                Ohio
Trickeration, Inc.                                                    Ohio
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2)                                        Ohio
Pharmaceutical Logistics, Inc.                                        Ohio
PMC - Colinet, Inc.                                                   Ohio
PMC Industries Corp.                                                Ohio
Precision Machining Connection LLC (3)                                Ohio
RB&W Corporation of Canada                                          Ontario
RB&W Manufacturing LLC (4)                                            Ohio
The Ajax Manufacturing Company (5)                                    Ohio
Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation                                   Ohio
Park-Ohio Forged & Machined Products LLC                              Ohio
Pharmacy Wholesale Logistics, Inc.                                    Ohio
</Table>

(1) Doing business as RB&W Logistics, Arden Fasteners, Gateway Industrial
    Supply, Free Gate and Georgia Industrial Fasteners

(2) Doing business as Park Drop Forge, Ohio Crankshaft and Park-Ohio Forged &
    Machined Products

(3) Doing business as PMC Industries and M.P. Colinet

(4) Doing business as Delo Screw Products, RB&W Manufacturing, Sabina Mfg., and
    American Fasteners

(5) Doing business as Ajax Technologies and Forging Development