alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Hill International, Inc.**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

I, Irvin E. Richter, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Hill International, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover reporting. 

 

Dated:  November 7, 2008
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00294-CV

JAMES C. FULLER,

Appellant

v.

BENITO MOYA, ET AL.,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9678CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant James C. Fuller filed suit against the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice and TDCJ employees Benito Moya, Tommy Goodin, Freddie English, Floyd 

Hicks, an unnamed property officer for the Wynne Unit, and “Major Butcher.” The trial 

court granted English’s and Hick’s motion to dismiss and dismissed Fuller’s 

“cause of action” as frivolous “with prejudice as to all claims.” However, not all the 

named defendants had been served when the dismissal order was signed, two of the 

defendants appeared and filed answers after the dismissal order was signed, and only 
Fuller v. Moya Page 2

English and Hicks sought a dismissal. By order dated November 10, 2009, this Court 

requested briefing from the parties regarding whether the dismissal order is appealable.

The parties have filed briefs with Fuller contending that the order is appealable 

while the appellees contend that it is not. We agree with the appellees and will dismiss 

the appeal.

Generally, “an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. A judgment is 

final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record, 

except as necessary to carry out the decree.” Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

195 (Tex. 2001) (footnotes omitted). However,

a judgment may be final, even though it does not dispose of all parties 

named in the petition, if the remaining party was never served with 

citation and did not file an answer, and nothing in the record indicates 

that the plaintiff ever expected to obtain service upon the remaining party.

Garcia v. State Farm Lloyds, 287 S.W.3d 809, 812 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2009, pet. 

filed) (citing Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn, 362 S.W.2d 230, 232 (Tex. 1962)); see 

also M.O. Dental Lab v. Rape, 139 S.W.3d 671, 674-75 (Tex. 2004) (reaffirming validity of 

Youngstown Sheet & Tube).

Here, the trial court granted English’s and Hick’s motion to dismiss on June 10, 

2009. Moya and the unnamed property officer for the Wynne Unit were served on May 

24 (before the dismissal order), but the returns for these citations were not filed until 

June 29. Moya answered Fuller’s suit on July 13. Goodin was served by certified mail, 

return receipt requested, on July 24. Fuller filed a “Motion for Summary Judgement” 

on July 27. And Goodin answered Fuller’s suit on August 10.
Fuller v. Moya Page 3

The record reflects that, after the June 10 dismissal, other defendants were served 

and Fuller has continued to litigate his claims with respect to the remaining defendants. 

Therefore, the June 10 order of dismissal is not a final, appealable judgment. See Garcia, 

287 S.W.3d at 812.

Accordingly, we dismiss Fuller’s appeal.

FELIPE REYNA

Justice 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 16, 2009

[CV06]
EXHIBIT 4.1
FLEXIBLE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

OPTION GRANTING PLAN FOR THE TERM DECEMBER 31, 2002 TO DEC 31, 2003

From time to time it is in the best interests of the Company to grant options
to:

1.       Directors and Officers
2.       Employees
3.       Certain consultants not involved in SEC proscribed activities.

The purpose of options in all cases is to:

1.       Align the interests of the optionees with those of the Company over
         time.
2.       Provide potential material incentive for effort above and beyond that
         normally required by a person in that position.
3.       Conserve corporate capital by maintaining lower base salaries than
         might otherwise be reasonable. 4. Ensuring, as much as possible, that
         consultants regard themselves as part of the ongoing success of the
         Company and therefore engage more thoroughly.

Method of setting Option Grants:

The Company's standard option agreement is to be used in every case. It is to be
modified only as needed for special cases.

1.       Directors and Officers options will be set annually. The number
         requested by a director or officer will be proposed to the Board of
         Directors by the individual. The compensation committee will adjust as
         they see fit and place the revised numbers in front of the full board
         for approval. No board member may vote on their personal option grant.
         The strike price for options is the market close or higher on the day
         of grant.
2.       Employees may be granted options in numbers and at times decided by the
         CEO. The Board of Directors must approve the grants. No options will be
         granted with strike prices below the market close on the day of
         granting unless there is a very exceptional reason.
3.       Consultants who meet the criteria enforced by the SEC regarding capital
         raising, stock sales, promotion and market making can be granted
         options at times and in numbers decided by the CEO. The board of
         directors must approve the grants. The strike price of the options must
         be the market close on the grant date or higher. In rare, unusual
         situations, the Company may award options to parties who do not meet
         the requirements set by the SEC. Options granted to these parties will
         not be registered ever and in the event they are exercised will be
         issued as restricted shares and subject to all the rules of restricted
         shares.


/s/J. H. BIENTJES               /s/ROBERT N.O'BRIEN           /s/DAN O'BRIEN
-------------------             --------------------          ----------------
J. H. Bientjes                  Robert N.O'Brien              Dan O'Brien
Director                        Director                      Director and
                                                              Officer
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32004R0604

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 604/2004 of 29 March 2004 on the communication of information on tobacco from the 2000 harvest onwards***Official Journal L 097 , 01/04/2004 P. 0034 - 0038*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 604/2004

of 29 March 2004

on the communication of information on tobacco from the 2000 harvest onwards

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2319/2003(2), and in particular Article 21 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2636/1999 of 14 December 1999 on the communication of information on tobacco from the 2000 harvest onwards and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1771/93(3) has been substantially amended several times(4). In the interests of clarity and rationality the said Regulation should be codified.

(2) The information to be communicated under Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 and the regulations adopted for its application should be laid down.

(3) In the interests of efficient administration, this information should be grouped and a timetable established for its submission.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Member States shall communicate the information set out in Annexes I, II and III in accordance with the time limits given therein.

The information shall be provided for each harvest and for each group of varieties.

Article 2

The Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the economic operators concerned provide them with the information required within the relevant time limits.

Article 3

Information on stocks held by first processing enterprises shall be communicated in accordance with Annex III.

Article 4

Regulation (EC) No 2636/1999 is repealed.

References to the repealed Regulation shall be construed as references to this Regulation and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex V.

Article 5

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2004.

For the Commission

The President

Romano Prodi

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.

(2) OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 323, 15.12.1999, p. 4.

(4) See Annex IV.

ANNEX I

>PIC FILE= "L_2004097EN.003502.TIF">

ANNEX II

>PIC FILE= "L_2004097EN.003602.TIF">

ANNEX III

>PIC FILE= "L_2004097EN.003702.TIF">

ANNEX IV

Repealed Regulation with its successive amendments

>TABLE>

ANNEX V

CORRELATION TABLE

>TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF WORLD WIDE STONE CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED FILED FOR THE PURPOSE OF
SECTION  11 OF THE  SECURITIES  ACT OF 1933  AND  SECTION  18 OF THE  SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE  LIABILITY OF SUCH  SECTIONS,
NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT
BY REFERENCE,  UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY  INCORPORATES  THIS EXHIBIT BY
REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         221,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    626,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,007,411
<PP&E>                                       4,226,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                 933,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,086,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,302,161
<BONDS>                                        212,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,704
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,536,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,086,418
<SALES>                                      3,111,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,111,918
<CGS>                                        1,679,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,679,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,037,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                459,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (300,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            759,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   759,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Robert REYNOLDS, Defendant.

No. COA18-445

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                        |  |  |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SK Realty Ventures, Inc., (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Eric Sheppard, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant




Date:
                August 20, 2007
            
            /s/
                Eric SheppardEric
                SheppardPresident
                and Acting Chief Financial
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
      deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
      Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
      after
      the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 21Subsidiaries of the Registrant





EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|Parent                       |  | Subsidiary                 |  | Percentage

of

Ownership |  | State ofIncorporationor
Organization
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                             |  |                            |  |                           |  |                                     
|                             |  |                            |  |                           |  |                                     
|First Place Financial

Corp. |  | First Place Bank           |  | 100%                      |  | Federal                             
|                             |  |                            |  |                           |  |                                     
|                             |  |                            |  |                           |  |                                     
|First Place Financial
Corp.  |  | First Place Holdings, Inc. |  | 100%                      |  | Ohio
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ TRACY W. KROHN             
|                        |  | Tracy W. Krohn                 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer        
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ WILLIAM W. TALAFUSE        
|                        |  | William W. Talafuse            
|                        |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31983R3514

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3514/83 of 13 December 1983 amending Regulations (EEC) No 2191/81 and (EEC) No 2192/81 concerning the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit-making institutions and organizations and by the armies and similar forces of the Member States***Official Journal L 351 , 14/12/1983 P. 0013 - 0013 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 29 P. 0148  Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 29 P. 0148  Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 17 P. 0020  Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 17 P. 0020*

*****

COMMISSION  REGULATION (EEC) No 3514/83  

of 13 December 1983  

amending Regulations (EEC) No 2191/81 and (EEC) No 2192/81 concerning the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profitmaking institutions and organizations and by the armies and similar forces of the Member States  

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN  

COMMUNITIES,  

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,  

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1600/83 (2), and in particular Article 12 (3) thereof,  

Whereas the voucher mentioned in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1446/83 (4), is to be valid only from the first day of the calender month; whereas the butter cannot be taken over until after that date; whereas experience of the scheme has shown that it is necessary to put forward that date in order to make it possible for deliveries of butter to be made earlier; whereas the period during which butter can be taken over should therefore be adjusted; whereas this provision also appears in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2192/81 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1446/83; whereas the same amendment should also be made in that Regulation;  

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,  

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:  

Article 1  

Article 3 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 and Article 3 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2192/81 shall read as follows:  

'A voucher shall be valid for the calendar month indicated thereon. Delivery may, however, be made during the period beginning on the 20th day of the preceding month and terminating on the 10th day of the month following the month indicated.'  

Article 2  

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.  

Done at Brussels, 13 December 1983.  

For the Commission  

Poul DALSAGER  

Member of the Commission  

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.  

(2) OJ No L 163, 22. 6. 1983, p. 56.  

(3) OJ No L 213, 1. 8. 1981, p. 20.  

(4) OJ No L 146, 4. 6. 1983, p. 19.  

(5) OJ No L 213, 1. 8. 1981, p. 24.