alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 511 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain easements held 

by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and to 

terminate associated contractual arrangements with the Village. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED 

CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF 

CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS. 

(a) TERMINATION AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

may terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned 

by the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated 

contractual arrangements with the Village. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the termination of 

an easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such 

compensatory arrangements with the Secretary as determined to 

be appropriate by the Secretary. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT
  31.1**





**CERTIFICATION
  REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE**


**SECURITIES
  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** ****





I,
  Soo Bong Min, Chief Executive Officer of Wilshire Bancorp, Inc., certify that:




1.
  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wilshire Bancorp, Inc.;




2.
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
  period covered by this report;




3.
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
  report;




4.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
  within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
  evaluation; and




(c)
  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting; and




5.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
  reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
  the equivalent functions):




(a)
  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
  and




(b)
  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.





WILSHIRE BANCORP, INC.Date: November 15, 2004
        By:
        /s/ Soo Bong Min .Soo Bong MinChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         140,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,812,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,728,000
<PP&E>                                       1,156,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,487,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,617,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,220,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,487,000
<SALES>                                      7,027,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,027,000
<CGS>                                        2,837,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,837,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,444,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               250,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,413,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,413,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,413,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.38)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ David D. Stevens


David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2003
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our reports dated January 31, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gray Communications Systems,
Inc., incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A-1) of Bull
Run Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2000.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-91296, Form S-8 No. 333-56125 and Form S-8 No. 333-39700)
pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91298) pertaining to the Bull Run
Corporation Non-Employee Directors' 1994 Stock Option Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-84833) pertaining to the issuance of shares of BR
Holding, Inc. of our reports dated January 31, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gray Communications Systems,
Inc., incorporated herein by reference.



                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
July 23, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1979]



[[Page 5482]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Institute of Timber Construction

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 23, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act 
off 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``Act''), American Institute of 
Timber Construction (``AITC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Institute of Timber Construction, Centennial, CO. The nature and scope 
of AITC's standards development activities are: AITC is the secretariat 
of a single standard ANSI/AITC A190.1 and maintains the revision of 
this standard using the ``Procedures for Development of American 
Standards Institute of Timber Construction Consensus Standards'' 
approved by the American National Standards Institute on June 6, 2003. 
The said standard describes the minimum requirements for the 
production/manufacture of structural glued laminated as well as the 
quality control system which must be employed by the manufacturer.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1979 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-0034

Lower Tribunal No. 15-15284

________________

V.T., the Father,

Appellant,

vs.

The Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cindy S.

Lederman, Judge.

Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura J. Lee

(Sanford), for the Guardian ad Litem Program, for appellees.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
We affirm. The trial court's final order terminating the parental rights of the

father is supported by competent substantial evidence.

Affirmed.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,785
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,061)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,785
<SALES>                                          4,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,272
<CGS>                                            2,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (146,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (146,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (146,816)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
#### PATRICIA A. BOTT v. KENNETH F. BOTT, JR.

No. 7416DC986

(Filed 16 April 1975)

Appeal by defendant from *Allen, Judge.*Judgment entered 11 July 1974 in District Court, Orange County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 February 1975.

*W. Paul Pulley, Jr., P.A., by W. Paul Pulley, Jr., and Elisabeth S. Petersen, for plaintiff appellee.*

*Winston, Colemom and Bernholz, by Barry T. Winston and Roger B. Bernholz, for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, MARTIN and ARNOLD, Judges.

Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ron Cornelius JOHNSON

No. 450P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Johnson, Ron Cornelius.

Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
#### MARSHALL CHARLES BOWEN, Administrator of the Estate of JOHN LARRY BOWEN v. RICHARD BURNETT JONES

No. 7328SC554

(Filed 3 April 1974)

Evidence § 11 — transactions with decedent — waiver of objection

Where, in an action to recover for the wrongful death of a passenger in an automobile driven by defendant, plaintiff offered evidence as to the sobriety of his intestate and of defendant, plaintiff waived such right as he may have had under G.S. 8-51 to object to defendant’s rebuttal testimony on the same question.

Appeal by defendant from *Martin (Harry C.), Judge,*5 March 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Buncombe County.

This is an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate who was killed while a passenger in a car operated by defendant. Defendant denied negligence and alleged contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff’s intestate, contending that he participated in a drinking party with defendant and continued to ride with defendant knowing that defendant was intoxicated. The jury answered issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

*Wade Hall for plaintiff appellee.*

*Morris, Golding, Blue and Phillips by James F. Blue III for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

Although defendant argues that his motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been allowed, we are of the opinion that the evidence made out a case for consideration by the jury.

There must be a new trial, however, for errors committed when the court did not allow certain testimony from defendant. *225Plaintiff introduced testimony from several witnesses to the effect that defendant did not have the odor of alcohol about him immediately after the accident. Plaintiff also elicited testimony tending to show that there was no odor of alcohol about plaintiff’s intestate immediately after the accident. Defendant thereafter attempted to testify, in effect, that he and plaintiff’s intestate had been together for several hours and that both of them had been drinking. That testimony was excluded by the court. Plaintiff, having offered evidence on the material question of the sobriety of the parties, waived such right as he might have had under G.S. 8-51 to object to rebuttal testimony on the same question from defendant. *Pearce v. Barham,*267 N.C. 707, 149 S.E. 2d 22; *Carswell v. Greene,*253 N.C. 266, 116 S.E. 2d 801; *Bryant v. Ballance,*13 N.C. App. 181, 185 S.E. 2d 315, *cert. den.,*280 N.C. 495, 186 S.E. 2d 513.

New trial.

Judges Hedrick and Baley concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

d0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140440 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140440 

 COA: 287087 

Ionia CC: 07-013625-FH 

RAYMOND CHARLES FAIRFIELD, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                William D. Kirkland |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William                D. Kirkland     |   |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4825 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4825

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct unused appropriations for Members' Representational 
    Allowances to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit 
                reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL 
              ALLOWANCES TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO REDUCE 
              THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for Members' Representational Allowances for the 
House of Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 
payments are made under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited 
in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that in the case 
of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal budget deficit, such 
amounts shall be used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as the 
Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4825

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To direct unused appropriations for Members' Representational 
    Allowances to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit 
                reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.
```
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31998R2387

**Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 2387/98 of 3 November 1998 concerning the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community, and the European Community, acting as one party, to an Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America***Official Journal L 297 , 06/11/1998 P. 0004 - 0004*

COMMISSION REGULATION (EURATOM) No 2387/98 of 3 November 1998 concerning the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community, and the European Community, acting as one party, to an Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,

Having regard to the Council's approval,

Whereas the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Community, acting as one Party, to the Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America, should be approved on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 

The accession by the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Community, acting as one Party, to the Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America, as modified by the Protocol of 7 July 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Agreement`), and the Declaration of the European Communities relating to Article 1 are hereby approved on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.

The texts of the Agreement, the Instrument of Accession, and the Declaration are annexed to this Regulation (1).

Article 2 

One Representative of the Community on the Governing Board shall be appointed by each of the Council and the Commission pursuant to Article IV(C) of the Agreement.

Article 3 

The Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine has legal personality and will enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under laws applicable in the Community and, in particular, may contract, acquire or dispose of movable and immovable property and be a party to legal proceedings.

Article 4 

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 1998.

For the Commission

The President

Jacques SANTER

(1) OJ L 225, 12. 8. 1998, p. 4.