alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31999R0866

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 866/1999 of 26 April 1999 concerning the authorisation of new additives and new additive uses in feedingstuffs***Official Journal L 108 , 27/04/1999 P. 0021 - 0027*

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 866/1999

of 26 April 1999

concerning the authorisation of new additives and new additive uses in feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs(1), as last amended by Directive 1999/20/EC(2), and in particular Articles 3 and 9j thereof,

(1) Whereas Directive 70/524/EEC provides that new additives or new additive uses may be authorised, taking account of advances in scientific and technical knowledge;

(2) Whereas Council Directive 93/113/EC of 14 December 1993 concerning the use and the marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations in animal nutrition(3), as last amended by Directive 97/40/EC(4), by derogation from Directive 70/524/EEC, authorised Member States to permit provisionally the use and marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations;

(3) Whereas the examination of the dossiers, submitted by the Member States in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 93/113/EC, indicates that a certain number of preparations belonging to the groups of enzymes and micro-organisms can be provisionally authorised;

(4) Whereas the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition has delivered a favourable opinion with regard to the harmlessness of these preparations;

(5) Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Feedingstuffs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The preparations belonging to the group "enzymes" and listed in Annex I to this Regulation may be authorised according to Directive 70/524/EEC as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

The preparations belonging to the group "micro-organisms" and listed in Annex II to this Regulation may be authorised according to Directive 70/524/EEC as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 July 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 80, 25.3.1999, p. 20.

(3) OJ L 334, 31.12.1993, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 21.

ANNEX I

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

>TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4658 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4658

 To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to eliminate civil money 
penalties for inducements to physicians to limit services that are not 
              medically necessary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2014

Mr. McDermott introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to eliminate civil money 
penalties for inducements to physicians to limit services that are not 
              medically necessary, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATING CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES FOR INDUCEMENTS TO 
              PHYSICIANS TO LIMIT SERVICES THAT ARE NOT MEDICALLY 
              NECESSARY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1128A(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ``medically necessary'' 
after ``reduce or limit''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments made on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | (1)    | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended                September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of                the                dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report.                                                                                                                    |

|                                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ John              Works                                                                       |   |   |   |
| John                Works Chief                  Financial Officer November                    8, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas Gurkowski, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's

fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 21, 2006.



/s/ Thomas Gurkowski

_______________________

Thomas Gukowski

(Secretary/Treasurer and CFO)





---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.43

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

AMOUNT: $500,000.00                                            DATE: JULY 5 2000

Twelve days after date of receipt, for value received, the undersigned (jointly
and severally if more than one) promise(s) to pay to the order of:

                                 AccuRec LLC.

The sum of five hundred thousand dollars plus an interest equal to (8% annually)
payable at any place the holder may so designate. Interest to be paid at loan
pay off time.

The undersigned and any endorser or guarantors herefore, jointly and severally,
hereby agree that upon default in payment of performance of this note, or the
death, or any act of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of any of them,
however expressed or indicated, then this note shall, at the option of the
holder, become immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest
or futher attorney and/or agent of the holder, and the undersigned, and any
endorser or guarantors, jointly and severally, agree to pay all collection
costs, expenses, agents' fees, and reasonable attorney's fees.

The undersigned further states if he should default on said loan, the lender
shall be authorized to place a lien on the following collateral:

               1. All properties of Color Image, Inc.


Borrowers Signature:                        Address:

/s/ Sueling Wang                            4350 Peachtree Ind. Blvd. #100
-----------------------------------------
Sueling Wang, President Color Image, Inc.   Norcross, GA 30071

/s/ Ann Shieh
-----------------------------------------
Witness

/s/ Larry Lyn
-----------------------------------------
Witness
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Flexible Solutions International Inc. on
form 10KSB for the period ended Decmber 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan O'Brien, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ DAN O'BRIEN
---------------
Dan O'Brien
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 23, 2005







                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
(the Company) on form 10KSB for the period ended Decmber 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Fred Kupel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ FRED KUPEL
---------------
Fred Kupel
Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2005
#### Adrienne M. Lefkowitz, Appellant, v Schulte, Roth & Zabel, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 859]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered September 28, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In contesting the defendant’s fee in a related proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, the plaintiff, *inter alia,*asserted a counterclaim sounding in legal malpractice. By virtue of the Surrogate’s decree fixing the value of the defendant’s services, the court necessarily concluded that there was no malpractice *(see, Koppelman v Liddle, O’Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson,*246 AD2d 365; *Pirog v Ingber,*203 AD2d 348; *Grace & Co. v Tunstead, Schechter & Torre,*186 AD2d 15; *Chisholm-Ryder Co. v Sommer & Sommer, 78*AD2d 143; *Kagan Meat & Poultry v Kalter,*70 AD2d 632). Accordingly, the plaintiffs legal malpractice claims based upon the same services at issue before the Surrogate’s Court are barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata *(see, Ryan v New York Tel. Co.,*62 NY2d 494). Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, James H. Hirst, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Solpower
Corporation (the "Company");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
     an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Dated: September 19, 2005                       By: /s/ James H. Hirst
                                                   -------------------
                                                   James H. Hirst
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOE LEWIS PRICE

No. 7214SC530

(Filed 2 August 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *Cooper, Judge,*14 January 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Durham County.

Defendant was convicted of possessing narcotic drugs, to wit, thirty bindles of heroin, on 18 November 1971. Judgment was entered imposing an active sentence of thirty months.

*610
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan by Richard N. League, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*John E. Bugg for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant was ably represented at trial and on this appeal by his court-appointed counsel. We have carefully considered the several assignments of error brought forward and find no error which requires a new trial.

No error.

Judges Parker and Graham concur.
#### First Constitution Bank *v.*Harbor Village Limited Partnership et al.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14782.

*Jonathan S. Bowman,*in support of the petition.

*Jonathan D. Elliott,*in opposition.

Decided May 26, 1993

The petition of the defendant Fairfield Dock Company, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 15 (AC 11548), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a different standard apply in determining whether or not defectively recorded mortgages, as opposed to defectively recorded mechanic’s liens, are valid, if both are properly executed?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that a certificate of mechanic’s lien, properly executed, and properly indexed in the Greenwich Land Records, but whose property description became detached prior to recording, is invalid?”
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

P.H., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, TINKER 

AIR FORCE BASE, OK, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0987

Issued: November 30, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On April 8, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from an October 10, 2019 decision of the Office 

of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned 

Docket No. 20-0987. 

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act 

(FECA).1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of 

OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the October 10, 2019 decision was April 7, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until April 8, 2020, more than 180 days after the October 10, 

2019 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 20-0987 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

explain his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) (2009).
2

compelling circumstances. Because there is no final, adverse decision issued by OWCP within 

180 days of the April 8, 2020 filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 20-0987 must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 20-0987 is dismissed.

Issued: November 30, 2020

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at 

§ 501.6(d).
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Humphrey P. Polanen, Chief Executive Officer of Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

| • | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: May 15, 2006

 

/s/Humphrey P. Polanen

Humphrey P. Polanen

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)