alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. (theCompany) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, JAMES WERTH LONGSHORE, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (b)
        the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
        May 14, 2008
        /s/
        James Werth Longshore
  By:
        James Werth Longshore
 Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Amtsblatt C 280A/9. A

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 280A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 66. Jahrgang9. August 2023 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 280A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

66. Jahrgang9. August 2023

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Bekanntmachung zur Änderung der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Beamte (m/w/d) der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 6) in folgenden Fachgebieten: 1. Mikroökonomie/Makroökonomie, 2. Finanzmarktökonomie, 3. Industrieökonomie ( ABl. C 220 A vom 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Bekanntmachung zur Änderung der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Beamte (m/w/d) der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 6) in folgenden Fachgebieten: 1. Mikroökonomie/Makroökonomie, 2. Finanzmarktökonomie, 3. Industrieökonomie ( ABl. C 220 A vom 22.6.2023 )

( ABl. C 220 A vom 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 280/1

---

Bekanntmachung zur Änderung der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Beamte (m/w/d) der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 6) in folgenden Fachgebieten: 1. Mikroökonomie/Makroökonomie, 2. Finanzmarktökonomie, 3. Industrieökonomie

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 220 A vom 22. Juni 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Seite 1:

| Anstatt: | „Bewerbungsschluss: 25. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit“ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

„Bewerbungsschluss: 25. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit“

| muss es heißen: | „Bewerbungsschluss: 26. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“ |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bewerbungsschluss: 26. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“

Seite 5:

| Anstatt: | „Bewerben Sie sich online über die
  EPSO-Website (2) bis zum 25. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die
  EPSO-Website (2) bis zum 25. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“

| muss es heißen: | „Bewerben Sie sich online über die
  EPSO-Website (2) bis zum 26. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“ |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die
  EPSO-Website (2) bis zum 26. Juli 2023 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.“

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/de/job-opportunities/open-for-application.

2

---
#### The Ponds Homeowners Association, Inc. *v.*The Ponds, Inc., of Hotchkiss Grove et al.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14783.

*Thomas E. Crosby,*in support of the petition.

*Richard F. Connors,*in opposition.

Decided May 26, 1993

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 919 (AC 11342), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the defendant The Ponds, Inc., fraudulently transferred, without consideration, certain condominium units to the individual codefendants (and Pomeroy Properties) where the only evidence in support were Real Estate Conveyance tax forms which were rebutted by evidence of a note and mortgage?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the individual defendants breached their May 11, 1989 agreement contrary to the statements of plaintiff’s counsel that he was not pursuing defendants under the counts of the complaint pertaining to that agreement and contrary to the evidence?”
#### PILOT FREIGHT CARRIERS, INC. v. DAVID G. ALLEN COMPANY, INC.

No. 7410DC1070

(Filed 2 April 1975)

Carriers § 12— action to recover shipping charges — instruction proper

In an action to recover shipping charges, trial court’s instruction on damages which complied with an earlier Court of Appeals decision in the case was proper.

Appeal by defendant from *Barnette, Judge.*Judgment entered 21 October 1974 in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 March 1975.

Plaintiff instituted this action seeking to recover shipping charges for delivery of crushed stone used by defendant in construction of a floor at the Raeford Turkey Plant. The trial court entered summary judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $1,373.99. This Court affirmed as to defendant’s liability on quasi-contract but remanded for determination of damages. *Freight Carriers v. Allen Co.,*22 N.C. App. 442, 206 S.E. 2d 750 (1974). The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $1,373.99.. From judgment entered, defendant appealed to this Court.

*316
      *Smith, Hibbert & Pahl, by Carl W. Hibbert, for plaintiff appellee.*

*Daniel R. Dixon for defendant appellant.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

In its opinion remanding this case as to the issue of damages, this Court said:

> “The only evidence in this record as to the value of the services rendered by the plaintiff and retained by the defendant is that shown on the ‘Freight Waybill’; and while not conclusive, it may be considered, if shown to be consistent with the Interstate Commerce Commission’s Schedule of Rates and Tariffs, together with other evidence, if any, in determining the reasonable value of such services.” *Freight Carriers v. Allen,*22 N.C. App. 442, 444-45, 206 S.E. 2d 750, 752-53 (1974).

Plaintiff, relying on the above language, presented a rate expert who testified that according to tariffs filed with the ICC the total charges for services rendered were $1,373.99. Defendant offered no evidence. The trial court instructed the jury that, if they found $1,373.99 to be reasonable and consistent with the ICC’s schedule of rates and tariffs, they must render a verdict for plaintiff in that amount. In light of our prior disposition of this case, we must find no error in the instruction.

No error.

Judges Britt and Morris concur.
Exhibit 12.1

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                                                     |                                                       | FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, |       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ------
|
|
|Fixed Charges:                                                       |                                                       |                                |       
|                                                                     | Interest Expense                                      |                                | 7,579 
|Assumed intererst element in rent                                    |                                                       | 427                            |       
|                                                                     |                                                       |                                |       
|Total fixed charges:                                                 |                                                       | 8,006                          |       
|Preference security dividend                                         |                                                       | 6,412                          |       
|                                                                     |                                                       |                                |       
|                                                                     | Total fixed charges and preference security dividends |                                | 14,418
|                                                                     | Earnings (loss):                                      |                                |       
|                                                                     | Income (loss) before income taxes                     |                                | 9,032 
|                                                                     | Fixed charges (per above)                             |                                | 8,006 
|                                                                     |                                                       |                                |       
|Total earnings (loss)                                                |                                                       | 17,038                         |       
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preference security dividends |                                                       | 1.2                            | X     

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           594,992
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,177,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                     422,203
<INVENTORY>                                    6,607,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              12,251,515
<PP&E>                                         8,112,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,474,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18,660,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,898,315
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          97,679
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,696,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,660,909
<SALES>                                       33,772,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              33,772,707
<CGS>                                         23,231,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13,340,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               464,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,263,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      63,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,327,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,327,565)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.34)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62014-62015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending September 
30, 2005

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22568.

[[Page 62015]]

    Date Filed: September 26, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference 
Teleconference, 25-27 July 2005; TC1 Within South America Resolutions 
(PTC1 0331); TC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference 
Teleconference, 25-27 July 2005; TC1 Longhaul between USA and Chile, 
Panama Resolutions (PTC1 0334); Minutes: TC1 Teleconference, 25-27 July 
2005 (Memo PTC1 338); Tables: TC1 Within South America specified fare 
table (Memo PTC1 0102); Technical Correction: TC1 Passenger Tariff 
Coordinating Conference Teleconference, 25-27 July 2005; TC1 Longhaul 
between USA and Chile, Panama (PTC0337); Intended effective date: 1 
January 2006.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22595.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Europe--Japan/Korea Expedited Resolution 002af 
(Memo 0130); rl; Intended effective date: 1 December 2005.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22598.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/TC123 Africa-TC3 Geneva & Teleconference, 12-14 
September 2005; Intended effective date: 1 November 2005.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22599.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/TC123 Middle East-South Asian Subcontinent expedited 
reso 002am; Geneva & Teleconference, 12-14 September 2005 (Memo 0240); 
TC23/TC123 Middle East-South West Pacific Expedited reso 002ai; Geneva 
& Teleconference, 12-14 September 2005 (Memo 0241); TC23/TC123 Middle 
East-Japan, Korea Reso 002an; Geneva & Teleconference, 12-14 September 
2005 (Memo 0242); Intended effective date: 1 November 2005.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-21453 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of 

W&T Offshore, Inc. and Subsidiaries: 

 

We areaware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-126251 and 333-126252) of W&T Offshore, Inc. of our report dated August 11, 2005 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements ofW&T Offshore, Inc. and Subsidiaries that is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

August 11, 2005
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board of Directors


East West Bancorp, Inc.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-128828, 333-46718, 333-54538, 333-113478, 333-118677, 333-96193, 333-156567, 333-150353, 333-161891, and 333-165886) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-85330, 333-91554, 333-105292, 333-88527, 333-88529 and 333-56468) on Form S-8 of East West Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of East West Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of East West Bancorp, Inc.




/s/ KPMG LLP




Los Angeles, California


February 28, 2011
IN RE: Webster WALLER

No. 253P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 28, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Webster Waller, for Waller, Webster

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 25th of January 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Granville County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2019."
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**RULE      13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |  /s/                David Collins                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David                Collins                                           |   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
June 1, 1999

Eckhardt Trading Company
53 West Jackson Boulevard - Suite 1240
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Attn: Ms. Audrey L. Gale

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  SSB Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Dear Ms. Gale:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 2000
and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

ECKHARD TRADING COMPANY

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
#### S. F. S. Realty Co., Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*George M. Adrian & Co., Inc., Defendant.

City Court of New York, New York County,

November 13, 1935.

*Shapiro & Frieder [Jacob Shapiro*of counsel], for the plaintiff.

*Mackey, Herrlich & Breen [Richard J. Mackey*of counsel], for the defendant,

*27Madigan, J.

The corporate veil may be drawn aside to expose and enforce obligations which in fact are obligations of other persons. On the other hand, the corporate form is not to be employed as an instrument for realizing on unjust demands. Certain survivors of Henry W. Gennerich, who may be referred to, generally, as his family, would use plaintiff corporation as a cloak to conceal the realities here. It is fairly to be inferred from the evidence that Henry W. Gennerich for many years represented, in relation to the various real properties, both himself and his family, the word family being employed to include all the persons referred to above. Though, at the present timé, the widow and the others would have themselves seen only as stockholders, the true view is indicated by the testimony of Walter H. Gennerich and the testimony of Charles A. Adrian. The transactions run back a quarter of a century. Henry W. Gennerich apparently was the head of the family. They left everything relating to the properties to him. He Was the person authorized to collect the rents. He could collect them himself or through some real estate office such as that conducted by defendant. However they might be collected, he was the person authorized to take and handle them. Had he not been handling them as he was authorized or entitled to handle them, it is natural to conclude, from the record, that one or more of the other persons concerned would have intervened. Now, however, disregarding everything which they did or failed to do in the past, they would make defendant pay again. There is testimony indicating that, before Henry W. Gennerich died, financial matters had become bad with him. Very likely they had, both with him and the family properties, in view of the condition of real estate. Is it not fairly to be inferred that the head of the family was doing the best he could for them? Now they would receive double benefit at defendant’s expense. The principles of law invoked by plaintiff are not applicable to this particular family situation. Possibilities for abuse in matters of the kind would be unlimited. Judgment for defendant.
In the MATTER OF: N.J.Y., JR., A.Y, C.L.

No. COA18-362

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, the chief financial officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:




(1)                The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Glenn D. BolducGlenn
      D. BolducVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      October 29, 2008







This
certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.