United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, BUREAU OF 

MEDICINE & SURGERY, CIVILIAN 

MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, NAVAL 

HOSPITAL, San Diego, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0541

Issued: April 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Kelley Craig, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On January 13, 2020 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a July 17, 2019

merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the 

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board 

has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.3

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $6,043.46, for which she was without fault, 

because she concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation and Social Security 

Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits for the period March 1, 2016 through 

May 25, 2019 without an appropriate offset; (2) whether it properly denied waiver of recovery of 

the overpayment; and (3) whether OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by 

deducting $100.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments, every 28 days.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On July 22, 1991 appellant, then a 37-year-old secretary, filed an occupational disease 

claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she developed bilateral upper extremity conditions as a result of 

her repetitive employment duties. OWCP accepted the claim for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. 

Appellant stopped work on June 5, 1991 and received intermittent wage-loss compensation 

benefits. She returned to work on August 18, 1991, but stopped work again on May 13, 1992 due 

to left carpal tunnel release surgery and did not return. Appellant received wage-loss compensation 

for temporary total disability on the supplemental rolls for which she was placed on the periodic 

rolls effective June 16, 2002. 

By letter dated April 12, 2017, OWCP advised appellant that FECA requires that her 

continuing compensation benefits be reduced if she begins receiving SSA age-related retirement 

benefits based on her federal service. It indicated that she should advise OWCP immediately if 

she had been approved for, or was currently receiving, SSA age-related retirement benefits as her

records indicated that she had turned 62, the minimum age at which an individual is eligible to 

receive SSA retirement benefits, within the last five years. 

On April 11, 2019 OWCP provided SSA with a Federal Employees Retirement System 

(FERS)/SSA dual benefits calculation form. 

On April 15, 2019 SSA completed the dual benefits calculation form, which listed 

appellant’s SSA benefit rates with a FERS offset and without a FERS offset from March 2016

through January 2019. Beginning March 2016, the SSA rate with FERS was $606.00 and without 

FERS was $453.30. Beginning December 2016, the SSA rate with FERS was $608.00 and without 

FERS was $454.60. Beginning December 2017, the SSA rate with FERS was $620.00 and without 

FERS was $463.70. Beginning December 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was $637.00 and without 

 

2 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

3 The Board notes that following the July 17, 2019 decision, OWCP and the Board received additional evidence.

However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the 

case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered 

by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this 

additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
3

FERS was $476.70. Beginning January 2019 the SSA rate with FERS was $637.00 and without 

FERS was $476.70. 

On May 21, 2019 OWCP prepared a FERS offset calculation worksheet wherein it noted 

the calculation of appellant’s overpayment from March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019. The total 

overpayment was determined to be $6,043.46.

In a letter dated June 4, 2019, OWCP notified appellant that, based on information provided 

by SSA regarding the amount of her age-related retirement benefit which was partially attributable 

to federal service, her FECA wage-loss compensation had been adjusted. It explained that she was 

in receipt of FECA benefits every four weeks amounting to $2,072.00. However, appellant’s

federal service increased her monthly social security payment by $148.43, which must be offset 

against her compensation benefits. OWCP explained that her compensation payments would be 

offset by the portion of her SSA retirement benefits attributable to her federal service on account 

of age, resulting in a new net compensation payment of $1,923.57, every 28 days. Appellant’s 

compensation payments were adjusted effective May 26, 2019. 

On June 11, 2019 OWCP issued a preliminary determination finding that an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $6,043.46 had been created. It explained that the overpayment 

occurred because her FECA benefits were not reduced by the FERS portion of her SSA age-related 

retirement benefits for the period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019. OWCP found appellant

without fault in the creation of the overpayment and forwarded an overpayment action request 

form and overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20). It requested that she provide

supporting documentation including income tax returns, bank account statements, bills and 

cancelled checks, pay slips, and any other records which supported income and expenses. OWCP 

afforded appellant 30 days to respond.

In an overpayment action request form dated June 27, 2019, received on July 2, 2019, 

appellant contested fact of overpayment, the amount of the overpayment, and requested a waiver 

of recovery because she was without fault in the creation of the overpayment. She argued that an 

overpayment had not been created because she was informed by SSA personnel that an offset only 

occurs for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) 

which she did not receive. Appellant explained that she was in receipt of Social Security agerelated retirement benefits and upon receiving her first SSA check, she was informed by both 

OWCP and SSA that her benefits would not change. 

In an accompanying June 27, 2019 letter, appellant reported that upon receiving OWCP’s 

May 30 and June 4, 2019 letters informing her that she was in receipt of dual FERS and SSA 

benefits without an appropriate offset, she contacted SSA and was informed that there was no 

information in her file which indicated that it had contacted OWCP regarding an offset. SSA 

further explained that an offset would only occur if she was in receipt of SSI or SSDI benefits. 

Appellant reported calling the claims examiner to relay the information provided by SSA and

requested that he look into the matter further as her research also indicated that her social security 

retirement benefits did not create an offset. She explained that before providing OWCP with any 

more of her personal and financial information, she would like them to investigate the matter 

further.
4

By decision dated July 17, 2019, OWCP finalized its preliminary overpayment 

determination finding that appellant had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount 

of $6,043.46 for the period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019, because it failed to offset her

compensation payments by the portion of her SSA age-related benefits that were attributable to 

her federal service. It further found that she was without fault in the creation of the overpayment, 

but denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment of compensation because she failed to provide 

any of the financial information requested. OWCP concluded that there was no evidence to 

substantiate that recovery of the overpayment would either defeat the purpose of FECA or be 

against equity and good conscience. It indicated that the overpayment would be recovered by 

withholding $100.00 from her continuing compensation payments every 28 days. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of his 

or her federal employment.4 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive compensation. 

While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, pay, or 

remuneration of any type from the United States.5

Section 10.421(d) of OWCP’s implementing regulations requires that OWCP reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of any SSA age-based benefits that are attributable to 

federal service of the employee.6 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have to 

be adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA benefit earned 

as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of FECA benefits 

and federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.7

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $6,043.46, for which she was without fault, because she 

concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation benefits and SSA age-related retirement 

benefits for the period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019.8 

In its July 17, 2019 decision, OWCP found that an overpayment of compensation was 

created for the period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019. The overpayment was based on the 

evidence that, while appellant was receiving compensation for total disability under FECA, she 

was also receiving SSA age-based retirement benefits. A claimant cannot receive both 

compensation for wage-loss and SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to federal service 

 

4 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a). 

5

Id. at § 8116.

6 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see L.J., 59 ECAB 264 (2007).

7 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (February 3, 1997).

8 T.B., Docket No. 18-1449 (issued March 19, 2019).
5

for the same period.9 The information provided by SSA established that appellant received SSA 

age-related retirement benefits that were attributable to federal service during the period March 1, 

2016 through May 25, 2019. Consequently, the fact of overpayment has been established.10

To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of the SSA benefits that were 

attributable to federal service must be calculated. OWCP received documentation from SSA with 

respect to the specific amount of SSA age-related retirement benefits that were attributable to 

federal service. SSA provided the SSA rates with FERS, and without FERS for specific periods 

commencing March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019. OWCP provided its calculations for each 

relevant period based on the SSA worksheet. No contrary evidence was provided.

When contesting OWCP’s June 11, 2019 preliminary determination, appellant asserted that

the SSA retirement benefits did not create an overpayment of compensation based on information 

on websites governing state and local regulations. However, as noted above, FECA governs the 

implementing regulations, which provide that benefits have to be adjusted for the FERS portion of 

SSA age-related retirement benefits due to a prohibited dual benefit.11 

The Board has reviewed OWCP’s calculation of benefits received by appellant for the 

period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019 and finds that an overpayment of compensation in 

the amount of $6,043.46 was created.12

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129 of FECA provides that an individual who is without fault in creating or 

accepting an overpayment is still subject to recovery of the overpayment unless adjustment or 

recovery would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and good conscience.13 

The waiver or refusal to waive an overpayment of compensation by OWCP is a matter that rests 

within OWCP’s discretion pursuant to statutory guidelines.14

Recovery of an overpayment will defeat the purpose of FECA if such recovery would cause 

hardship to a currently or formerly entitled beneficiary because the beneficiary from whom OWCP 

seeks recovery needs substantially all of his or her current income, including compensation 

benefits, to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses, and the beneficiary’s assets do 

 

9 See E.K., Docket No. 18-0587 (issued October 1, 2018).

10 L.M., Docket No. 19-1197 (issued January 8, 2020). 

11 Supra note 7.

12 See D.C., Docket No. 17-0559 (issued June 21, 2018).

13 5 U.S.C. § 8129; 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.433, 10.434, 10.436, and 10.437; see A.S., Docket No. 17-0606 (issued 

December 21, 2017).

14 See Robert Atchison, 41 ECAB 83, 87 (1989).
6

not exceed a specified amount as determined by OWCP.15 Additionally recovery of an 

overpayment is considered to be against equity and good conscience when an individual who 

received an overpayment would experience severe financial hardship in attempting to repay the 

debt or when an individual, in reliance on such payment or on notice that such payments would be 

made, gives up a valuable right or changes his or her position for the worse.16

OWCP’s regulations provide that the individual who received the overpayment is 

responsible for providing information about income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP. 

This information is needed to determine whether or not recovery of an overpayment would defeat 

the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. The information is also used to 

determine the repayment schedule, if necessary.17 Failure to submit the requested information 

within 30 days of the request shall result in a denial of waiver of recovery, and no further request 

for waiver shall be considered until the requested information is furnished.18

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the $6,043.46 

overpayment of compensation.19

As OWCP found appellant without fault in the creation of the overpayment, waiver must 

be considered, and repayment is still required unless adjustment or recovery of the overpayment 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.20 Appellant, 

however, had the responsibility to provide the appropriate financial information to OWCP.21

In its preliminary determination dated June 11, 2019, OWCP explained the importance of 

providing the completed overpayment questionnaire and financial information, including copies 

of income tax returns, bank account statements, bills, pay slips, and any other records to support 

income and expenses. It advised appellant that it would deny waiver if she failed to furnish the 

requested financial information within 30 days. Appellant, however, did not submit a completed 

Form OWCP-20 or provide any financial documentation supporting her income and expenses.22 

As a result, OWCP did not have the necessary financial information to determine if recovery of 

 

15 20 C.F.R. § 10.436(a)(b). For an individual with no eligible dependents the asset base is $6,200.00. The base 

increases to $10,300.00 for an individual with a spouse or one dependent, plus $1,200.00 for each additional 

dependent. Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management, Final Overpayment Determinations, 

Chapter 6.400.4(a)(2) (September 2018).

16 Id. at § 10.437(a)(b).

17 Id. at § 10.438(a); Ralph P. Beachum, Sr., 55 ECAB 442 (2004).

18 Id. at § 10.438(b).

19 A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued February 21, 2019).

20 20 C.F.R. § 10.436.

21 Id. at § 10.438; see N.J., Docket No. 19-1170 (issued January 10, 2020).

22 R.M., Docket No. 19-1570 (issued June 1, 2020).
7

the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or if recovery would be against equity and 

good conscience.23 The Board thus finds that OWC, properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment.24

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3

Section 10.441 of OWCP’s regulations provides that when an overpayment has been made 

to an individual who is entitled to further payments, the individual shall refund to OWCP the 

amount of the overpayment as the error is discovered or her attention is called to the same. If no 

refund is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of compensation, taking into account the 

probable extent of future payments, the rate of compensation, the financial circumstances of the 

individual, and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize any hardship.25

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3

The Board finds that OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$100.00 every 28 days from appellant’s continuing compensation payments.26

OWCP provided appellant a Form OWCP-20 with the June 11, 2019 preliminary 

determination. Appellant did not complete the overpayment recovery questionnaire or provide the 

necessary financial information to support her income and expenses prior to the final July 17, 2019 

overpayment decision. The overpaid individual is responsible for providing information about 

income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP.27 When an individual fails to provide 

requested financial information, OWCP should follow minimum collection guidelines designed to 

collect the debt promptly and in full.28 The FECA procedure manual provides that in these 

instances, OWCP should set the rate of repayment at 25 percent of the 28-day net compensation 

amount until the balance of the overpayment is paid in full.29 While appellant did not submit the 

financial information requested, the record reflects that her continuing 28-day compensation 

amounts to $1,923.57. Therefore, deducting $100.00 every 28 days from her continuing 

compensation is not in excess of the 25 percent repayment rate.30 

As appellant did not submit the financial documentation to OWCP as requested, the Board 

finds that there is no evidence of record to establish that OWCP erred in requiring recovery of the 

 

23 G.G., Docket No. 19-0684 (issued December 23, 2019).

24 20 C.F.R. § 10.438; see L.D., Docket No. 19-0606 (issued November 21, 2019).

25 Id. at § 10.441(a); see Donald R. Schueler, 39 ECAB 1056, 1062 (1988).

26 L.D., Docket No. 19-1423 (issued March 2, 2020).

27 20 C.F.R. § 10.438. See also A.F., Docket No. 19-0054 (issued June 12, 2019).

28 See A.S., Docket No. 19-0171 (issued June 12, 2019); Frederick Arters, 53 ECAB 397 (2002).

29 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, supra note 15 at 6.500.8(c)(1) (September 2018).

30 E.M., Docket No. 19-0857 (issued December 31, 2019).
8

$6,043.46 overpayment by deducting $100.00 every 28 days from appellant’s continuing 

compensation payments.31

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $6,043.46, for which she was without fault, as she concurrently 

received SSA age-related retirement benefits while receiving FECA wage-loss compensation 

benefits for the period March 1, 2016 through May 25, 2019. The Board further finds that OWCP 

properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment and properly required recovery of the 

overpayment by deducting $100.00 from her continuing compensation payments every 28 days. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the July 17, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed. 

Issued: April 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

31 M.D., Docket No. 19-1500 (issued February 24, 2020).