alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-1111V 

Filed: November 30, 2015 

Not for Publication 

************************************* 

EULA JANE MATTHEWS, * 

* 

 Petitioner, * 

 * 

 v. * 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* 

************************************* 

Gil L. Daley, II, Fort Worth, TX, for petitioner. 

Althea W. Davis, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On November 30, 2015, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to 

settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered GuillainBarré Syndrome (“GBS”) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) 

caused by her November 18, 2011 receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine. Respondent denies that 

the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s GBS, CIDP, or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties 

agreed to resolve this matter informally.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 

2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be 

made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that 

is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a 

clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify 

and move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon 

review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special 

master shall delete such material from public access.

Damages decision based on 

stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine; 

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); 

chronic inflammatory 

demyelinating polyneuropathy 

(CIDP)

 
 The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby 

adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of 

$150,000.00, representing reimbursement for all damages that would be available under 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) (2012). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in 

the amount of $150,000.00. 

 In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
### FI LED U . S . COURT OF APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT J uly 22, 20 05 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1167 9 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 03-00408 -CV -CA R-5 COMP ANION PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COM PANY, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,

ve rs us RO BE RT MA T H IS , MA RYMA T H IS , a s N at ur al G ua rd ians an d P ar en ts o f Ro be rt

Mart in J ohn Ma thi s, D ef en da nts -Appe lle es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (J ul y 22 , 200 5) Be fo re CA RN E S, MA RC U S an d C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Com panion Property

and Casualty

Insurance Com

pany (“ Com panion ”) f

iled thi s de cl ar at or

y j udgm en t a ct ionse ek ing a de te rm ina tio n th at it ha d no obl iga tio n,2

unde r pol ic ie s is sue d by

it , to de fe nd o r ind em

nif y Ri ch ar d D ougl as s and F ri en ds o f D ougla ss T he at

re Co m ple x, I nc . on c la im s a sse rt ed a ga ins t the m

by Ro be rt Mart in John Mathis and his p arents. The district court found that Com panion wa s oblig ated to def en d and inde m

nif y F ri en ds o f the D ougl as s T he atre Co m ple x, I nc . , but

w as not obl iga te d to de fe nd o r ind em nif y Ri ch ard D ougl as s in div idu al ly

. C om pa nio n ap pe al s, c ont en din g tha t the dis tr ic t co urt er re d in co nc lud ing tha t it w as obl iga te d to defend and indem

nify Friends of the D ougl ass Thea tre Com plex, Inc. Ha ving considered the briefs, and relevant parts of the re cord, w e conclude that the dis tr ic t c ourt er red in co nc lud ing tha t C om pa nio n w as obl iga te d to de fe nd and ind em nif y F ri en ds o f the D ougl as s T he atre Co m ple x, In c. Fo r the r ea sons se t f orth in SC I Li qui dat ing

Co rp. v. H

art ford F ire I ns. Co

. , 181 F. 3d 12 10, 1213-17 (11th Cir. 1999 ), w e ag re e w ithCo m pa nio n th at the int en tio na l c ondu ct a lle ge d inthe unde rl y ing a ct ion doe s not fa ll w ith in the de fi nit ion of a n “ oc cu rr en ce ” as de fi ne d in th e rel ev an t i ns ur an ce p ol ic ie s. The j udgm ent of the district court declaring that Com p an ion is n ot obl igated to d ef en d a nd i nde m

nif y D ougl as s onthe se c la im s is a ff irm ed ; and, the j udgm en t of the district c o u rt d eclar ing th at Com panion is oblig ated to defend and indem nify Fr ie nds of

D ougl as s T he atre Co m

ple x, I nc . is re ve rs ed

. AFFIR MED IN PART; R EVERSED IN PART.
Wm. Queen khuokle, page 2 (0.2477)

Il.3 bve been unable to find sny legal objeotion,to * person*% i"!':c:'

: attending

s barber sohooland a beauty sohoolat the same time, provided satisfaotory

hours could be arranged whereby there would lm no oonfliot in attendance

upon said sohools. You are therefore

respeotfully

advised

that itis the opinionof this deparbnwt that if B person oould complete the requiredooursesof instruotion

of both sahools

of one thousand

hours (1,000)

eaohl8thia

six months,and-s not otherwise disqualified,

said person would be eligible for both BeautyOperator's and Barber's

examinations.

,,,

WJF:AW%egw ~OvEr~JuLY9,194.0 /s/Glean R. Lewis Very trulyyours AlTORXEYGEXEFWLOFTEXA9 By /s/W. J. Fanning ,%I. J. Fanning Assistant

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BYBWB., Choinnrn
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Gutierrez, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xerium
Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any
change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas Gutierrez                 
|Thomas Gutierrez                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

E.Z., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU 

OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, SOUTHERN PUEBLOS 

AGENCY, Albuquerque, NM, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0269

Issued: July 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On December 16, 2020 appellant sought an appeal from an August 28, 20201decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 21-0269.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.2 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed his appeal.3 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final 

adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal. 

The August 28, 2020 decision accepted appellant’s claim for instability of the right knee joint; 

therefore, it was not adverse to appellant. As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

 

1 The Board notes that appellant requested an appeal from a purported December 16, 2020 OWCP decision. 

However, there is no such decision of record. The most recent decision is dated August, 28, 2020.

2 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009). 

3 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of OWCP.”
2

over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 21-0269 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0269 is dismissed.

Issued: July 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
EXHIBIT 32.3 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward F.Gotschall, Vice Chairman - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending March 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5069 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5069

To amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of 
Appellate Procedure to ensure access to the Federal judiciary in cases 
   where the interest of justice so requires, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2010

    Mr. Johnson of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of 
Appellate Procedure to ensure access to the Federal judiciary in cases 
   where the interest of justice so requires, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Payment of Court Fees Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

    Rule 68(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is amended by 
striking the period at the end and inserting ``, unless the court 
determines that the interest of justice justifies waiving such payment. 
For the purpose of making such a determination, the interest of justice 
includes the establishment of constitutional or other important 
precedent.''.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE.

    Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subdivision:
    ``(f) Waiver of Costs for Certain Appeals.--The court shall order a 
waiver of costs if the court determines that the interest of justice 
justifies such a waiver. For the purpose of making such a 
determination, the interest of justice includes the establishment of 
constitutional or other important precedent.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Renewable Assets, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2005, I, Alfred M.
Schiffrin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Renewable Assets, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renewable Assets,
Inc.

                                        /s/ ALFRED M. SCHIFFRIN
                                        -----------------------
                                        Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                        Chief Executive and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

September 9, 2005

                                      -13-
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:




(1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.








Date:   May 17, 2010


By: /s/ Jack Chen


Jack Chen


Chief Executive Officer





Date:   May 17, 2010


By: /S/ Maggie Zhang


Maggie Zhang


Acting Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C.
Woodworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                   /s/ Robert C. Woodworth
                                   ------------------------
                                   Robert C. Woodworth
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   March 25, 2003
10.8
                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                 LEASE AGREEMENT

This FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT ("Amendment") dated effective this 28th
day of February 2002, by and between  ParkerVision,  Inc., a Florida corporation
("Tenant")  and Jeffrey  Parker and Barbara  Parker  (collectively  "Landlord"),
amends that certain  Lease  Agreement  dated March 1, 1992,  as amended,  by and
between Landlord and Tenant (the "Lease"). Capitalized terms used herein and not
otherwise defined shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Lease.

Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:

     1.   The Minimum Basic Rent during the second Option Period as set forth in
          Paragraph 5 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows:

          Option Period                      Basic Rent
          -------------                      ----------
          Second option period
          (3/1/2002 - 2/28/2007)             $279,306 per year

     2.   Except  as  modified  by this  Agreement,  the  Lease  and  any  prior
          amendments  thereto  shall  remain  unchanged  and in full  force  and
          effect.

     3.   This  Amendment  shall  be  binding  upon the  heirs,  administrators,
          successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Landlord and Tenant have executed this Amendment as of
the date first written above.


PARKERVISION, INC., a Florida corporation

By:    /s/ Richard L. Sisisky                /s/ Jeffrey Parker
       -----------------------------         ---------------------------
Name:  Richard L. Sisisky                    JEFFREY PARKER
       -----------------------------
Title: President
       -----------------------------
                                             /s/ Barbara Parker
                                             ---------------------------
                                             BARBARA PARKER

                                       2
<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.6(b)


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                 LEASE AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN


                            P & T PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
                                     LESSOR

                                       AND


                        DIRECT SALES INTERNATIONAL, L.P.
                                     LESSEE

                       FOR OFFICE SPACE AT HERITAGE PLAZA
<PAGE>   2
State of Georgia
County of Cobb

            Whereas Lessor and Lessee entered into that certain lease dated
October 1, 1996 and whereas the parties wish to amend the lease as follows:

            PREMISES            shall be changed by deleting 19,564 square feet
                                and in its place inserting 16,744 square feet

            RENT                shall be changed by deleting Twenty-two
                                Thousand, Eight Hundred Twenty-four and 67/100
                                dollars ($22,824.67) and inserting Nineteen
                                Thousand, Five Hundred, Thirty-four and 67/100
                                Dollars ($19,534.67)

            COMMENCEMENT        The rental and the space change shall be
                                effective January 1, 1999.

            TERM                Unless sooner terminated as provided in the
                                Lease, the Term shall expire on April 1, 2004.

All other provisions of the lease are reconfirmed this 1st day of January, 1999.

                                "LESSOR"    P & T Properties, L.L.C.

                                            By: /s/ Richard L. Prochnow
                                               -------------------------
                                                  Richard L. Prochnow

                                            Title:      Manager
                                                  ------------------------------

                                "LESSEE"    Direct Sales International, L.P.

                                            By: Richard L. Prochnow
                                               -------------------------
                                                  Richard L. Prochnow

                                            Title: President of Direct Sales
                                                  --------------------------
                                            International, Inc., the General
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Partner
                                            -------