alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ALBERT LOCKLEAR, alias, BUDDY LOCKLEAR

No. 7216SC784

(Filed 20 December 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *Hobgood, Judge,*26 June 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Scotland County.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of imprisonment imposed upon his plea of guilty to a charge of armed robbery.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Raymond W. Dew, Jr., for the State.*

*James W. Mason for defendant appellant.*

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant entered a plea of guilty to a bill of indictment charging him with armed robbery.

The record supports the adjudication of the trial judge to the effect that defendant’s plea of guilty was freely, understanding^ and voluntarily made. No error appears in the record. We find and hold that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Brock and Graham concur.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gift Liquidators, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I
George Maxwell Colclasure, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           May 3, 2005

                                           /s/ George Maxwell Colclasure
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               George Maxwell Colclasure,
                                               Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gift Liquidators, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I
George Maxwell Colclasure, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           May 3, 2005

                                           /s/ Ronald G. Hurt
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Ronald G. Hurt,
                                               Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Gift
Liquidators, Inc. and will be retained by Gift Liquidators, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                           |  |                                     |  |                         |      |  |                                       
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ---- |  | --------------------------------------
|Parent                     |  | Subsidiary                          |  | Percentage of Ownership |      |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|First Place Financial Corp |  | First Place Bank                    |  | 100                     | %    |  | Federal                               
|First Place Financial Corp |  | The Northern Savings & Loan Company |  | 100                     | %    |  | Ohio                                  
|First Place Financial Corp |  | First Place Holdings, Inc.          |  | 100                     | %    |  | Ohio                                  
|First Place Financial Corp |  | First Place Capital Trust           |  | 100                     | %(1) |  | Delaware                              
|First Place Financial Corp |  | First Place Capital Trust II        |  | 100                     | %(1) |  | Delaware                              
|First Place Financial Corp |  | First Place Capital Trust III       |  | 100                     | %(1) |  | Delaware                              

---

|(1) | This is a special purpose entity and is accounted for by First Place Financial Corp. using the equity method of accounting rather than being included as fully consolidated in the
consolidated financial statements.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                            |  |                              |  |                       |      |  |                                    
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ---- |  | -----------------------------------
|Parent                      |  | Subsidiary                   |  | PercentageofOwnership |      |  | State ofIncorporationorOrganization
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Bank             |  | 100                   | %    |  | Federal                            
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Holdings, Inc.   |  | 100                   | %    |  | Ohio                               
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | Franklin Bank                |  | 100                   | %    |  | Federal                            
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Capital Trust    |  | 100                   | %(1) |  | Delaware                           
|First Place Financial Corp. |  | First Place Capital Trust II |  | 100                   | %(1) |  | Delaware                           

---

|(1) | This is a special purpose entity and is accounted for by First Place Financial Corp. using the equity method of accounting rather than being included as fully consolidated in the
consolidated financial statements.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 510 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 510

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that the payment 
  of the manufacturers' excise tax on recreational equipment be paid 
                               quarterly.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Boren, Mr. Ross, Mr. 
 Miller of Florida, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Mr. 
  Matheson, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
  McHugh, and Mrs. Bachmann) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that the payment 
  of the manufacturers' excise tax on recreational equipment be paid 
                               quarterly.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF MANUFACTURERS' EXCISE TAX ON 
              RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 6302 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mode or time of collection) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Time for Payment of Manufacturers' Excise Tax on Recreational 
Equipment.--The taxes imposed by subchapter D of chapter 32 of this 
title (relating to taxes on recreational equipment) shall be due and 
payable on the date for filing the return for such taxes.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-11403

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 2, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

James A. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Julius Isoron England in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and England’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 10.12
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
to the
Servicer Advance Financing Facility Agreement
Dated as of August 28, 2003
by and between
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION
and
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.
 Amendment Number
Four Borrower Lender Agreement
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE,
  SECTION 1. Amendments to Section 1 .
  Affiliate




---



##### 



Cash Equivalents S&P Moodys
 Guarantee
 Guaranty
 Indebtedness
 2




---



##### 



Lender
 Mortgage Note
 Termination Date
 Total Indebtedness
 Trustee
   SECTION 2. Amendments to Section 2 .
  2.1 Agreement to Lend
 3




---



##### 



Facility Amount
      2.10 Renewal Fee
 SECTION 3. Amendments to Section 3 .
   SECTION 4. Amendments to Section 5 .
   4




---



##### 



5.9 Net Worth
  5.10 Ratio of Total Indebtedness to Tangible Net Worth
  5.11 Liquidity
  5.15 Nature of Business
  5.17 Servicing
 5




---



##### 



SECTION 5. Amendments to Section 8 .
   SECTION 6. Amendments to Section 9 .
        6




---



##### 



SECTION 7. Amendments to Section 14 .
  14.3 Set-off provided
  To the Lender:
    
    Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.390 Greenwich Street, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10013Attention: Bobbie TheivakumaranTelephone: (212) 723-6753Facsimile: (212) 723-8604To the Borrower:
    
    New Century Mortgage Corporation18400 Von Karman, Suite 1000Irvine, California 92612Attention: Kevin DwyerTelephone: (949) 225-7808Facsimile: (949) 440-7033
 7




---



##### 



SECTION 8. Amendments to Schedules and Exhibits.
   SECTION 9. Representations .
 SECTION 10. Conditions Precedent . Amendments
 SECTION 11. Defined Terms .
 SECTION 12. Limited Effect .
 SECTION 13. Governing Law .
 SECTION 14. Counterparts .
  8




---



##### 



CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.
(Lender)By:
    
    /s/ Bobbie TheivakumaranName:
    
    Bobbie TheivakumaranTitle:
    
    Authorized AgentNEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION
(Borrower)By:
    
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

US Pan American Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 63362, 63363

)

Under Contract No. N64498-21-P-5507 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Jorge DelPino

 Vice President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Paul Scheck, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The disputes have been settled. By Order dated October 13, 2022, the Board 

informed the parties that it intended to dismiss these appeals unless either party objected 

within 14 days of the date of the Order. The Board received no objection from either 

party. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: November 15, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63362, 63363, Appeals of US Pan 

American Solutions, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 15, 2022

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE 13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Petrosearch Energy Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Dole, Chief Executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.
 
 
 Date:  June 15, 2009By:
/s/ Richard DoleRichard DoleChief Executive Officer
Order filed December 11, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00926-CV

____________

JAMES WHITAKER, Appellant

V.

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-07101

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed September 18, 2012. Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal on September 26, 2012. Appellant filed a motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis and an affidavit of indigence on November 2, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. 

No contest was filed. “Unless a contest is timely filed, no hearing will be 

conducted, the affidavit’s allegations will be deemed true, and the party will be allowed 

to proceed without advance payments of costs.” See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(f). 
Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk’s office is directed to file the clerk’s 

record within 30 days of the date of this order. The court reporter for the 151st District 

Court of Harris County is directed to file the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date 

of this order. If no record was taken, the court reporter is ordered to file notice with this 

court that no record was taken.

PER CURIAM
J.

J. delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials. 

### See NRAP 4(d), On January 2, 2015, the attorney general timely filed a response.

The documents provided by the attorney general indicate that appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official for filing on November 10, 2014, 14 days beyond the relevant appeal period. Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.



# CitLe8L--- J Saitta

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Steven J. Hann Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A ce
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000020 30-JAN-2018 08:01 AM
K. Scott FISCHER; Veronika M. Fischer; Brian E. Carroll; Bruce W. Breitweiser; Byana, LLC; Bowder, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Tina FAGAN and Michael Fagan, Defendants.

No. COA18-713

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
1

 The district clerk did not send a copy of the notice to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(c). We first learned of the attempted appeal on January 11, 2002, when the district clerk’s

record was received. 

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00023-CR

Pablo Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 007101, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

On December 4, 2000, Pablo Rodriguez pleaded guilty to engaging in organized

criminal activity. The district court deferred further proceedings and placed Rodriguez on community

supervision. Rodriguez filed his original notice of appeal on January 5, 2001.1

 He filed a

supplemental notice on February 14, 2001. 

The deadline for perfecting appeal was January 3, 2001. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. There is no

indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed

by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of

the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton
2

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996).

The appeal is dismissed.

 

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson 

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 31, 2002

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        I, the undersigned Director and/or Officer of Conexant Systems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute DWIGHT W. DECKER, DENNIS
E. O'REILLY, JASMINA THEODORE BOULANGER and PETER R. KOLYER, and each of them
singly, my true and lawful attorneys with full power to them and each of them to
sign for me, and in my name and in the capacity or capacities indicated below,
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2001, and any amendments thereto.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Signature                             Title                              Date
         ---------                             -----                              ----
<S>                             <C>                                        <C>

/s/ Dwight W. Decker
---------------------------     Chairman of the Board of Directors         November 30, 2001
     Dwight W. Decker               and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (principal executive officer)

/s/ Donald R. Beall
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
      Donald R. Beall

/s/ Richard M. Bressler
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
    Richard M. Bressler

/s/ Ralph J. Cicerone
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
     Ralph J. Cicerone

/s/ F. Craig Farrill
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
     F. Craig Farrill

/s/ Jerre L. Stead
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
      Jerre L. Stead

/s/ Balakrishnan S. Iyer
---------------------------          Senior Vice President and             November 30, 2001
   Balakrishnan S. Iyer               Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)

/s/ J. Scott Blouin
---------------------------          Senior Vice President and             November 27, 2001
      J. Scott Blouin                Chief Accounting Officer
                                  (principal accounting officer)
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

POWER OF ATTORNEY
(continued from prior page)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Signature                             Title                              Date
         ---------                             -----                              ----
<S>                             <C>                                        <C>

/s/ Hossein Eslambolchi
---------------------------                  Director                      November 30, 2001
    Hossein Eslambolchi
</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Charlotte, NC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0413

Issued: February 26, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On January 11, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from an April 2, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0413.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the April 2, 2020 decision was September 29, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until January 11, 2021, more than 180 days after the April 2, 

2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0413 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0413 is dismissed.

Issued: February 26, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).