alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5095 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5095

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2010

  Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Dent, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. 
Lance, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, 
  Mr. Royce, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Latta, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. 
Goodlatte, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Akin, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Franks 
 of Arizona, Mr. Conaway, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. 
Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Platts, Mr. Upton, and Mr. Lee of 
  New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Medical Innovation Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    Section 4191 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In connection with the Form 10-Q of
Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alex KamAlex
      KamChief
      Executive Officer and President(principal
      executive officer)Date:
      May 13, 2010/s/ Pan-Rong LiuPan-Rong
      LiuChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer and principal accounting
  officer)





Date: May
13, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Madison Avenue Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr.,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
                (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Curtis L. Garner, Jr.





Curtis
      L.
      Garner, Jr.


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      7, 2007
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

267P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2018

John R. Wester, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, Adam K. Doerr, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, Erik R. Zimmerman, Attorney at Law, Morgan P. Abbott, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, For Cooper, Roy A.

D. Martin Warf, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Berger, Philip E., et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, For North Carolina Bipartisan Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Caroline P. Mackie, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, John Michael Durnovich, Attorney at Law, Wendy R. Weiser, Attorney at Law, Daniel I. Weiner, Attorney at Law, Douglas E. Keith, Attorney at Law, For Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Democracy North Carolina

Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, Attorney at Law, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Hon. James G. Martin, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, Attorney at Law, For NC Professors of Constitutional Law

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of August 2018 by Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Democracy North Carolina for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
TITLE









EXHIBIT

10.28




 




AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY

NOTE




 




Promissory Note dated

April 29, 1992, executed by POPE RESOURCES, a Delaware Limited

Partnership, in favor of JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, in the

face amount of $16,000,000.00 is hereby amended as set forth herein.




 




1.             Section 2 is amended so as to add thereto the

following:




 




Anything to the contrary

in this Note notwithstanding, up to an aggregate of 40,000 MBF of timber may be

harvested from the Property during the two year period from January 1,

1993 to December 31, 1994 without creating any obligation of the Maker to

reduce the principal balance of this Note. 

Any harvest in excess of said 40,000 MBF during said two-year period

will require principal reduction payments as specified in (b) above.  Starting in 1995, the annual harvest

limitations and permissible carry-over provisions set forth in this Note as

originally executed will continue to apply. 

Provided, that no carry-over from 1992 of unused allowable harvest

volume shall be allowed and that in no event will a carry-over be permitted of

any portion of the said 40,000 MBF allowance that is not harvested prior to

January 1, 1995.




 




2.             NOTICE TO BORROWER:  THIS NOTE PROVIDES FOR A PREPAYMENT PREMIUM THAT WILL BE DUE IF

PAYMENTS IN A SPECIFIED AMOUNT ARE NOT MADE IN ADVANCE OF THE TIME OR IN EXCESS

OF THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTE, EXCEPT AS MAY BE OTHERWISE PROVIDED

HEREINABOVE.




 




3.             As amended the said Note is ratified and confirmed.




 




4.             This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1,

1993.




 




5.             The executed original hereof shall be physically

attached to the executed original of said Note.




 




DATED this 25  day

of May, 1993.




 




	

   


  	

  POPE RESOURCES,

  A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, having a principal place of business at

  Poulsbo, Washington


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

  By:  POPE MGP, INC., Managing General Partner


  	 

	

  ATTEST:


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

  /s/ George H.

  Folquet


  	 

	

   


  	

  /s/ Thomas A. Griffin


  	

   


  	

                (Signature)


  	 

	

   


  	

  (Signature)


  	

   


  	

  George H.

  Folquet, President


  	 

	

   


  	

  Thomas A. Griffin,

  Treasurer


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

  APPROVED AND AGREED TO

  this 2nd day of June, 1993.


  	

  JOHN HANCOCK

  MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

  By:


  	

  /s/ Donald A.

  Morway


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

                (Signature)


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

  Donald A. Morway


  
	

   


  	

  Title:


  	

  Assistant

  Treasurer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. OTIS LEE LEWIS

No. 7226SC834

(Filed 20 December 1972)

On *certiorari*to review order of *McLean, Judge,*entered at 10 May 1971 Session of Superior Court, Mecklenburg County.

Defendant was charged with forgery and uttering a forged check. At trial he entered a plea of guilty to uttering a forged check. The court questioned him at length with respect to the voluntariness of his plea. Defendant, a high school graduate, *160stated under oath that he understood the charge against him; was not under the influence of alcohol, narcotics, medicines, or pills; that he was satisfied with the services of his counsel; was in fact guilty; had had time to subpoena witnesses; had not received any promises or threats to influence his plea; and was freely, voluntarily and understandingly pleading guilty. The court entered judgment that defendant be imprisoned for a period of ten years. Defendant, in open court, gave notice of appeal. Counsel was appointed to perfect his appeal.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Deputy Attorney General Vañore, for the State.*

*Arthur Goodman, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

MORRIS, Judge.

We note that the bill of indictment contained two counts— one for felonious forgery and one for feloniously uttering a forged instrument. It appears that the first count, forgery, may be fatally defective. However, the indictment for the felony of uttering a forged instrument is, in all respects, proper. This was the charge to which defendant entered a plea of guilty. The transcript of his plea and the adjudication of the court thereon appear in the record. The sentence imposed is within the statutory limits.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Parker concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated December 14, 1999 (except as to the matter discussed in Note 2, as
to which the date is December 28, 1999), to the Stockholders of Rawlings
Sporting Goods Company, Inc. included in this Form 10-K, into Bull Run
Corporation's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File Nos.
33-91296, 33-91298, 333-56125 and 333-39700, and into BR Holding, Inc.'s
previously filed Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 333-84833.



/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
September 26, 2000
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Presidential Documents 61017 

Proclamation 7948 of October 14, 2005 

National Forest Products Week, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

America’s forests are a source of pride, and they provide crucial products 

and materials for our citizens and communities. As we celebrate National 

Forest Products Week, we recognize the importance of our forests to our 

economy and way of life, and we reaffirm our commitment to protecting 

them through wise stewardship and sensible land management. 

Across our Nation, people and businesses use forest products to meet their 

daily needs. Forests provide paper for books and newspapers, lumber for 

homes and buildings, and materials for countless other items. As good 

citizens, we have a shared responsibility to cultivate and sustain our forests 

and minimize the risk of catastrophic fires that harm people, property, 

and the environment. 

My Administration has made good forest stewardship a priority. Through 

the Healthy Forests Initiative, we are reducing the frequency and severity 

of wildfires by thinning out and removing forest undergrowth before disaster 

strikes. The commonsense management practices we are implementing are 

helping to strengthen our economy, keep communities safe, save the lives 

of firefighters, and protect threatened and endangered habitats and wildlife. 

Sound conservation policies and responsible maintenance provide improved 

protection for our forests and greater economic prosperity for our citizens. 

During National Forest Products Week, we renew our commitment to sustain 

America’s forests. 

Recognizing the importance of our forests, the Congress, by Public Law 

86–753 (36 U.S.C. 123), as amended, has designated the week beginning 

on the third Sunday in October of each year as ‘‘National Forest Products 

Week’’ and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this week. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 16 through October 22, 2005, as 

National Forest Products Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this 

week with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

61018 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–21030 

Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         |                                                    
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                         | /s/Roger P. Deschenes                              
|                         | Roger P. Deschenes                                 
|                         | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: September 28, 2015 |                                                    





This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)  promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Thalia GietzenThalia GietzenVP of Finance
EXHIBIT 23.2


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our reports  dated January 27,
1998  (except  for the  Pending  Acquisition  of Note C, as to which the date is
February 13, 1998),  with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and
schedule of Gray  Communications  Systems,  Inc.  included in the Annual  Report
(Form 10-K) of Bull Run Corporation, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-91296)  pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation  1994 Long Term Incentive Plan
and the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-91298)  pertaining to the Bull
Run Corporation Non-Employee Directors' 1994 Stock Option Plan.



                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 1998
#### MARVIN JAMES SCHIFF, Appellant, *v.*MECHAM CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., RALPH HALEY dba WHITEY’S PLUMBING, W. R. HUSBAND dba HUSBAND TILE CO., and GIFFORD ELECTRIC, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents.

No. 4949

February 3, 1966

410 P.2d 758

*Calvin C. Magleby,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Paul L. Larsen,*of Las Vegas, for Respondents.

*52OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In the lower court two actions were consolidated for trial, Case No. 118632 entitled “Mecham Construction Company, Inc., Plaintiff, versus Marvin James Schiff, et al, Defendants,” and Case Number 118881 entitled “Mecham Construction Company, Inc., Ralph Haley dba Whitey’s Plumbing, W. R. Husband dba Husband Tile Company, and Gifford Electric, Inc., Plaintiffs, versus Marvin James Schiff, Defendant.”

Case No. 118632 was to recover the sum of $2,733.50 which the defendant allegedly borrowed from the plaintiff.

Case No. 118881 was to recover the sum of $3,917.40 for work, labor and materials furnished by the plaintiffs to the defendant at his request.

The issues presented in the lower court were factual and, after trial of the consolidated actions, the court found against the defendant in each case. The defendant Schiff has appealed.

(1) The appeal does not present questions of law for resolution,1 and a full opinion by this court would have *53no value as precedent. The record shows that the findings of the lower court are supported by substantial evidence. Friendly v. Larsen, 62 Nev. 135, 144 P.2d 747. Accordingly, the judgment as to total sums is affirmed, though as to the $3,102.11 provided as a single amount for “extras” due all four parties plaintiff, we feel that the record, and the plaintiffs, require an explicit division allotting $1,092 to Gifford Electric, Inc.; $319.25 to Husband Tile Company; $250 to Whitey’s Plumbing; and the remainder, $1,440.86, to Mecham Construction Co., Inc.

1

 The record shows that Schiff and Mecham made a joint-venture contract concerning the houses, and Schiff insisted below, and here, that all rights must rest on that contract. The trial court, however, found as a matter of fact that the joint-venture contract had been mutually abandoned. This finding is supported by substantial evidence. Cf. Holland v. Crummer Corp., 78 Nev. 1, 368 P.2d 63.
DTH MEDIA CORPORATION, et al. v. FOLT, et al.

142PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 15, 2019

Hugh Stevens, Attorney at Law, Michael J. Tadych, Attorney at Law, for DTH Media Corporation, et al.

Stephanie A. Brennan, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Folt, Carol L., et al.

Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Vicitim Rights Organizations.

*42The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 15th of January 2019 by Defendants:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of January 2019."

Defendants shall have up to and including the 29th day of January 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### Helen M. REED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David B. MARKER, et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 90-171J.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 25, 1990.

*652Kim R. Gibson, Somerset, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Gloria A. Tischuk, Deputy Atty. Gen., Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed a civil rights complaint alleging that on September 8, 1988, a search warrant was executed by defendant David B. Marker, a Pennsylvania State Police trooper, and by other unknown law enforcement officers, some of whom were members of the state police. The warrant erroneously described the plaintiffs residence in Shade Township, Somerset County, rather than the premises intended to be searched. As a consequence, approximately six to nine armed law enforcement officers broke down the door of the house at 1:15 A.M., and proceeded to search the plaintiff’s residence for controlled substances for approximately one hour. Not until an hour after the officers had left did defendant Marker call to explain that they had searched the wrong residence. When the officers broke through the door, plaintiff Reed allegedly was struck by the door and knocked unconscious; the other plaintiffs suffered from shock, fright, and embarrassment as pajama-clad, they witnessed the armed officers going through their house.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and David B. Marker in his official capacity have filed a Motion to Dismiss asserting that the Eleventh Amendment bars plaintiffs from bringing a complaint for monetary damages against them in federal court, and that in any case they are not within the definition of “persons” who can be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *Will v. Michigan Department of State Police,*491 U.S. 58, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989). No reason why this complaint should be excepted from the Eleventh Amendment has been advanced by plaintiffs. The motion to dismiss of defendants, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and David B. Marker, in his official capacity, is granted.

It is unclear from plaintiffs’ Complaint whether they intend to allege claims against Trooper Marker in his individual capacity. Plaintiffs shall, if they desire to allege claims against Trooper Marker, file their amended complaint on or before November 16, 1990.