alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 280A/9. a

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 280A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 669. avgust 2023 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 280A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 669. avgust 2023

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Objave |
| | UPRAVNI POSTOPKI |
| | Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Sprememba razpisa javnega natečaja – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) na naslednjih področjih: 1. Mikroekonomija/makroekonomija, 2. Finančna ekonomija, 3. Industrijska ekonomija ( UL C 220 A, 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

V   Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Sprememba razpisa javnega natečaja – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) na naslednjih področjih: 1. Mikroekonomija/makroekonomija, 2. Finančna ekonomija, 3. Industrijska ekonomija ( UL C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

( UL C 220 A, 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

V Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 280/1

---

Sprememba razpisa javnega natečaja – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) na naslednjih področjih: 1. Mikroekonomija/makroekonomija, 2. Finančna ekonomija, 3. Industrijska ekonomija

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 220 A z dne 22. junija 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Stran 1:

| besedilo: | „Rok za prijavo: 25. julij 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času“ |
| --- | --- |

besedilo:

„Rok za prijavo: 25. julij 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času“

| se glasi: | „Rok za prijavo: 26. julij 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času“ |
| --- | --- |

se glasi:

se glasi:

„Rok za prijavo: 26. julij 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času“

Stran 5:

| besedilo: | „Prijaviti se je treba elektronsko na
  spletišču urada EPSO (2)
  do: 25. julija 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času.“ |
| --- | --- |

besedilo:

besedilo:

„Prijaviti se je treba elektronsko na
  spletišču urada EPSO (2)
  do: 25. julija 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času.“

| se glasi: | „Prijaviti se je treba elektronsko na
  spletišču urada EPSO (2) do: 26. julija 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času.“. |
| --- | --- |

se glasi:

se glasi:

„Prijaviti se je treba elektronsko na
  spletišču urada EPSO (2) do: 26. julija 2023 do 12. ure (opoldne) po srednjeevropskem času.“.

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/sl/job-opportunities/open-for-application

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4989 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4989

 To require consideration of the life-cycle cost of a building during 
 the construction of certain Federal buildings, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require consideration of the life-cycle cost of a building during 
 the construction of certain Federal buildings, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Buildings Sustainable Design 
Standards Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF LIFE-CYCLE COST REQUIRED.

    (a) Requirement.--The head of a Federal department or agency 
constructing a building described in subsection (b) shall ensure that 
the life-cycle cost of the building is considered with respect to the 
design of the building.
    (b) Federal Buildings Subject to the Requirement.--A building is 
subject to the requirement under subsection (a) if--
            (1) construction of the building begins after the date of 
        enactment of this Act;
            (2) the estimated construction costs of the building exceed 
        $1,000,000; and
            (3) Federal funding comprises more than of 50 percent of 
        the funding for the estimated construction costs of the 
        building.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Life-cycle cost.--The term ``life-cycle cost'' means 
        the sum of the following costs, as estimated for the lifetime 
        of a building:
                    (A) Investment costs.
                    (B) Capital costs.
                    (C) Installation costs.
                    (D) Energy costs.
                    (E) Operating costs.
                    (F) Maintenance costs.
                    (G) Replacement costs.
            (2) Lifetime of a building.--The term ``lifetime of a 
        building'' means the period of time during which a building is 
        projected to be utilized.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and

 

(2) The information contained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   June 14, 2011 | /s/   Robert J. Ferguson                                    |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Robert   J. Ferguson, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |                                                        |
|                       |                                                        |
| Date:   June 14, 2011 | /s/   Lucas G. Schneider                                    |
|                       | Lucas   G. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4764 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4764

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 
    of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2010

 Mr. Carter (for himself, Ms. Titus, Mr. LoBiondo, Ms. Jackson Lee of 
Texas, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mrs. Christensen, 
    Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Rogers of 
 Michigan, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Mica, Mr. Olson, Mr. Bonner, Mr. 
  Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Neugebauer, and Mr. 
  McCotter) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 
    of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouses Employment Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR THE WORK 
              OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (I) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(J) a qualified military spouse.''.
    (b) Qualified Military Spouse.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of 
such Code is amended by redesignating paragraphs (11), (12), and (13) 
as paragraph (12), (13), and (14), respectively, and by inserting after 
paragraph (9) the following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Qualified military spouse.--The term `qualified 
        military spouse' means any individual who is certified by the 
        designated local agency as being a spouse (determined as of the 
        hiring date) of a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States who is serving on a period of extended active duty which 
        includes the hiring date. For purposes of the preceding 
        sentence, the term `extended active duty' means any period of 
        active duty pursuant to a call or order to such duty for a 
        period in excess of 90 days or for an indefinite period.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of this Act 
to individuals who begin work for the employer after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on October 13, 2005, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - September 8, 2005 (Open and Closed).

### B. Reports 

    - Potential Impact of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita on the FCS.

### C. New Business—Regulations 

    - Risk-Based Capital Stress Test—Proposed Rule.

Dated: October 7, 2005. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 05-20721 Filed 10-12-05; 2:27 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             121                     101
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,756                   1,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,651                   2,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                           1,321                   1,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,163                  12,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,495                   8,689
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       1
<COMMON>                                             7                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,661                   3,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,163                  12,630
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,057                   7,023
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,341                   6,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146                      81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 223                     271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    347                     311
<INCOME-TAX>                                       142                     135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                205                     176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       205                     176
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33                     .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33                     .32


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133879 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JOHN A. DELAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133879 COA: 273118 WCAC: 04-000501 BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES CORPORATION, and LUMBERMAN’S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
#### Lawrence Hanfgarn, Plaintiff, *v.*George Mark, Defendant.*

Supreme Court, Queens County,

February 28, 1936.

*123
      *Edwin G. Jenkins,*for the plaintiff.

*Jesse C. Rogers,*for the defendant.

Affd., 248 App. Div. 325. Sec *contra, Vanderbilt*v. *Hegeman*(157 Misc. 908); *Fearon*v. *Treanor*(248 App. Div. 225).

Faber, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. The action is brought by a husband for the alienation of his wife’s affections and for criminal conversation. The motion raises the question of the constitutionality of the recent enactment (Laws of 1935, chap. 263) of article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 61-a to 61-i), which, it is stated generally, is in the nature of a legislative experiment to abolish such rights of action because of possible evils in practice. No authority directly in point is cited. Several articles in law periodicals have dealt with this legislation and types of it in other States (Ohio Law Repr. April, 1935, commented on and reprinted in N. Y. L. J. April 4-6, pp. 1710, 1732, 1756, 1935; 33 Michigan Law Review, 979; 69 U. S. Law Review, 474 ; 30 Illinois Law Review, 764), the trend of all being against the constitutionality thereof under the New York State Constitution (Art. 1, § 6, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U. S. Const.). The reasoning followed is that since the rights of action at which the legislation is directed (so far, at least, as presented in the present action) are of common-law origin *(Winsmore*v. *Greenbank,*Willes Rep. 577; *Oppenheim*v. *Kridel,*236 N. Y. 156, at p. 162), such rights of action, like the rights of action for libel, slander, assault and battery, negligence, or for recovery of debt, are beyond the power of the Legislature to abolish utterly without supplying some reasonably adequate and efficient substitute. In that view is the opinion of Mr. Justice Miller, writing for the Appellate Division in this Department, in *MacMullen*v. *City of Middletown*(112 App. Div. 81), and the reversal in the Court of Appeals (187 N. Y. 37) on other grounds did not impair the force and validity of the opinion below, as more clearly, perhaps, appears in the affirmance by the Court of Appeals (183 N. Y. 550) of *Williams*v. *Village of Port Chester*(72 App. Div. 505; 97 id. 84), in which Mr. Justice Woodward wrote for the Appellate Division in this Department. In like logic is the opinion of Mr. Justice Crane, now chief judge of the Court of Appeals, in *Herkey*v. *Agar Mfg. Co.*(90 Misc. 457). I am of the opinion that such a law (Laws of 1935, chap. 263), so far as applicable to this action, is unconstitutional, and the motion to dismiss is, therefore, denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-20127 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Matthew Steven Hackney, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-219-1

______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Matthew Steven Hackney pleaded guilty to four child pornography offenses and now appeals two of those convictions for production of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). Re lying on published and unpublished authority from this court, he concedes that relief on the issues he asserts is

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 8, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-20127 Document: 00516888751 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/08/2023No. 23-20127

2 foreclosed, and he raises the issues to preserve them for further review. We dispense with further br iefing and affirm. First, Hackney asserts that the fact ual basis supporting his guilty pleas to those two counts is insufficient un der Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 because he did not admit facts es tablishing the interstate commerce elements of § 2251(a) and § 2252A(a)(5)(B ) as he contends those statutes should be construed based on Bond v. United States , 572 U.S. 844 (2014). Alternatively, he raises a co nstitutional argument based on National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius , 567 U.S. 519 (2012). Reviewing only for plain error, see United States v. Trejo , 610 F.3d 308, 313 (5th Cir. 2010), Hackney’s arguments with resp ect to his convictions under both statutes are unavailing, see United States v. Bailey , 924 F.3d 1289, 1290 (5th Cir. 2019). In light of the foregoing, the Government’s motions for summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an exte nsion of time to file an appellate brief

are DENIED

. See United States v. Coleman , 817 F.3d 907, 909 (5th Cir. 2016). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 23-20127 Document: 00516888751 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/08/2023
| (1)  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                                                              |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |

|         |                                 |                          |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|         |                                 |
|    |                            |                     |
|         | By:                        | /s/              Scott Miller |
|         | Scott              Miller            |
|         | Chief              Executive Officer |

|         |                                 | October              13,              2006 |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|         |                                 |
|    |                            |                                  |
|         | By:                        | /s/              Faith Forbis              |
|         | Faith              Forbis            |
|         | Chief              Financial Officer |
|         | October 13,              2006        |