alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





Dated:
            May
      14, 2008
            
            
            
            RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY K FUND, LLCBy:
            /s/
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            May
      14, 2008By:
            /s/
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy K Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40319 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

EULOGIO MARTINEZ

- ARELLANO ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 896

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eulogio Martinez

Arellano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez

- Arellano has file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Martinez

- Arellano ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40319 Document: 00513685731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2016No. 16

- 40319

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40319 Document: 00513685731 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**ANSWERS CORPORATION**

**FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I am the Chief Financial Officerof Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I am deliveringthis certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (“Form 10-Q”).

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ihereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: May 12, 2008       |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ STEVEN STEINBERG          |
|   |                          |
|   | Steven Steinberg              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
# Journal officiel C 280A/9 ao

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 280A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 66e année9 août 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 280A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

66e année9 août 2023

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Avis modifiant l’avis de concours général — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Administrateurs (AD 6) dans les domaines suivants: 1. Microéconomie/macroéconomie, 2. Économie financière, 3. Économie industrielle ( JO C 220 A du 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Avis modifiant l’avis de concours général — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Administrateurs (AD 6) dans les domaines suivants: 1. Microéconomie/macroéconomie, 2. Économie financière, 3. Économie industrielle ( JO C 220 A du 22.6.2023 )

( JO C 220 A du 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 280/1

---

Avis modifiant l’avis de concours général — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Administrateurs (AD 6) dans les domaines suivants: 1. Microéconomie/macroéconomie, 2. Économie financière, 3. Économie industrielle

(
  «Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 220 A du 22 juin 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Page 1:

| au lieu de: | «Date limite de dépôt des candidatures: le 25 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles», |
| --- | --- |

au lieu de:

«Date limite de dépôt des candidatures: le 25 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles»,

| lire: | «Date limite de dépôt des candidatures: le 26 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles». |
| --- | --- |

lire:

lire:

«Date limite de dépôt des candidatures: le 26 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles».

Page 5:

| au lieu de: | «Les candidats doivent postuler en ligne sur le
  site internet d’EPSO (2)
  au plus tard le 25 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles.», |
| --- | --- |

au lieu de:

au lieu de:

«Les candidats doivent postuler en ligne sur le
  site internet d’EPSO (2)
  au plus tard le 25 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles.»,

| lire: | «Les candidats doivent postuler en ligne sur le
  site internet d’EPSO (2) au plus tard le 26 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles.». |
| --- | --- |

lire:

lire:

«Les candidats doivent postuler en ligne sur le
  site internet d’EPSO (2) au plus tard le 26 juillet 2023 à 12 h 00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles.».

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/fr/job-opportunities/open-for-application

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hollaway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    David
Hollaway  
|David Hollaway         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 2, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7548** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ROBERT FULTON ROOD, IV , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00052

- CMH

- 1; 1:14

- cv - 01144

- CMH )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Robert Fulton Rood, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Uzo Enyinnaya Asonye, Michael Edward Rich, Assistant United States Attorneys, Christopher John Catizone, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Fulton Rood, IV, seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a con stitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional clai ms is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rood has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Collegiate Funding Services,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Kevin A. Landgraver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
Date: November 12, 2004
By: /s/ Kevin A. Landgraver
Exhibit
32.2






Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I,
Jonathan A. Graf, Chief Financial Officer of American Campus Communities, Inc.
(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (i)The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (ii)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated: 
       August 11, 2008
              /s/
      Jonathan A. GrafJonathan
      A. GrafExecutive
      Vice President, Chief
                Financial
      Officer and Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Hill International, Inc.**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

I, Irvin E. Richter, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of Hill International, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover reporting. 

 

Dated: August 7, 2008
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TOMMY HOYT WHITE

No. 7229SC582

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *Falls, Judge,*8 May 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Rutherford County.

Defendant was charged with felonious escape in violation of G.S. 148-45, having already been once convicted of escape. Represented by court-appointed counsel, defendant pleaded guilty to a violation of this statute. The court entered judgment that defendant be imprisoned for 9 months. Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Deputy Attorney General Vanore, for the State.*

*Robert G. Summey for defendant appellant.*

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant’s counsel asks that this Court review the record and determine if any error exists. We have carefully reviewed *653the record and find that the bill of indictment was in proper form; that the guilty plea was freely, understandingly, and voluntarily made; and that the sentence imposed was within the statutory limits. We find the record free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Britt concur.
Opinion issued April 2 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00364
- CV

——————————— MELVIN TAYLOR AND J& S EXCHANGE, INC ORPORATED , Appella nt s V. JOHN PETROSKY , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2017
- 48573

MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is an agreed motion for reversal and remand for entry of judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties
have settled all matters in controversy. By their motion, the parties have agreed that the underlying judgment should be reversed, and the case should be remanded2

for entry of a take

- nothing judgment. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the agre ed motion, reverse the trial court’s judgment, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of a take

- nothing judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The motion does not specify that the parties have reached an agreement regarding costs. A ccordingly, costs are taxed against the appellants , Melvin Taylor and J&S Exchange, Incorporated

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(d).

Julie Countiss Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00511

- CR

Ex parte Jorge Ulises Apoderado Cadena

On Appeal from the County Court of Kinney County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14533CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

ap peal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
May 2, 2024
EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP


<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration No. 333-38971 of
Community Savings Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report on the consolidated
financial statements of Community Savings Bankshares, Inc. as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1999, dated February 18, 2000 appearing in this Annual
Report on Form-10K of Community Savings Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1999.





                                        Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 22, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad A.
Morrice, Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Brad A. MorriceBrad A. MorriceVice Chairman, President and Chief Operating OfficerJune 1, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending March 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Caleb Leslie DISORDA, Defendant.

No. COA18-620

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2004 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
PERFORMANCE-ACCELERATED RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 THIS PERFORMANCE-ACCELERATED RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT Award Agreement  Award Date Corporation  Participant
 WITNESSETH
 WHEREAS Plan Award
 NOW THEREFORE
 1. Defined Terms
 2. Grant Restricted Stock
 3. Vesting th Exhibit A
 4. Continuance of Employment
  1




---



##### 



5. Dividend and Voting Rights
 6. Restrictions on Transfer
 7. Stock Issuance
 Book Entry Form
 Certificates to be Held by Corporation; Legend
 The ownership of this certificate and the shares of stock evidenced hereby and any
interest therein are subject to substantial restrictions on transfer under an
Agreement entered into between the registered owner and New Century Financial
Corporation. A copy of such Agreement is on file in the office of the Secretary of
New Century Financial Corporation.
 Delivery of Certificates Upon Vesting
 2




---



##### 



Stock Power; Power of Attorney
 8. Effect of Termination of Employment or Services .
 General
 Death or Disability th Disability
 Attainment of Age 65
 3




---



##### 



th
 Forfeiture of Shares
 9. Adjustments Upon Specified Events
 4




---



##### 



Restricted Property
 10. Tax Withholding
 11. Notices
 5




---



##### 



12. Plan after
 13. Entire Agreement
 14. Section Headings
 15. Governing Law
 16. Stockholder Approval
  6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
a Maryland corporationBy:Name:
    Brad MorriceTitle:
    Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating


Officer PARTICIPANTBy:Name: 7




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 PERFORMANCE-ACCELERATED VESTING
  (a)
    
    If the Corporations Before-Tax Net Income (as defined in Appendix A of the
Plan) equals or exceeds $500 million for any period of four (4) consecutive fiscal
quarters of the Corporation that commences on or after the Award Date, 33 1/3% of the
Restricted Shares shall become vested on the last day of such period.(b)
    
    If vesting of the Award accelerates pursuant to clause (a) above and the
Corporations Before-Tax Net Income equals or exceeds $600 million for any subsequent
period of four (4) consecutive fiscal quarters of the Corporation that commences after
the last day of the period referred to in clause (a), an additional 33 1/3% of the
Restricted Shares shall become vested on the last day of such subsequent period.(c)
    
    If vesting of the Award accelerates pursuant to clause (b) above and the
Corporations Before-Tax Net Income equals or exceeds $720 million for any subsequent
period of four (4) consecutive fiscal quarters of the Corporation that commences after
the last day of the period referred to in clause (b), the Award shall become fully
vested on the last day of such subsequent period.
October 29, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HUNG PHUOC LE, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00043-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.