alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Each of the undersigned, Shaun E. McAlmont, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (the “Company”), and Cesar Ribeiro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”).





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his respective knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:           August 6, 2010








/s/ Shaun E. McAlmontShaun E. McAlmontPresident & Chief Executive Officer/s/ Cesar RibeiroCesar RibeiroChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2065

EUNICE WAMIRU KAGWIMI,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-265-285; A95-265-284)

Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 13, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW & PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, John

C. Cunningham, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ashley B. Han, Office of

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eunice Wamiru Kagwimi, a native and citizen of Kenya,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision

denying her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In her petition for review, Kagwimi challenges the

determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for

asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented

was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find

the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record

and conclude that Kagwimi fails to show that the evidence compels

a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that

she seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Kagwimi’s request

for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum—even though the

facts that must be proved are the same—an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Kagwimi fails to show that
- 3 -

she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal.

We also find that substantial evidence supports the

finding that Kagwimi fails to meet the standard for relief under

the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an

applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he

or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of

removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006). We find that Kagwimi

failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Joseph THERISEAUD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2025.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1972.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, John H. Wood, Jr., District Judge.

C. D. Moyers, Moyers & Searls, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Victor K. Sizemore, Edward Marquez, Asst. U. S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of violating Title 21 U.S.C.A., § 176a through the alleged importation of 53 pounds of marihuana into the United States from Mexico. The sole assignment of error is that the district court erred in denying appellant’s motion for acquittal based on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully considered the evidence. It was more than ample to make an issue for the jury and to support the jury verdict of guilty.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69833, 333-69835, 333-69839, 333-69837,
333-72835, and 333-96385) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-65909) of the Pennzoil-Quaker
State Company of our report dated February 10, 2000 relating to the financial
statements of Excel Paralubes, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 3, 2000
IN RE: E.M.

46P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2019

Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, David W. Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender, for E.M.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Marie Hartwell Evitt, Attorney at Law, Tammera S. Hill, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of February 2019 by Respondent for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of March 2019."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 18th day of March, 2019 to Respond to Petition for Discretionary Review.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-030-1310-DB]


Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Creston/Blue Gap II Natural Gas Project, Carbon and Sweetwater 
Counties, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) inadvertently published a 
draft version of a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Creston/Blue Gap II Natural Gas Project, Carbon and 
Sweetwater Counties, Wyoming in the Federal Register on Thursday, 
September 8, 2005 (70 FR 53381). The BLM is publishing this correction 
notice to strike the last sentence. The sentence being removed is ``A 
decision for the Creston/Blue Gap II Natural Gas Project (C/BG2 
Project) will not be made nor implemented until after a Record of 
Decision is issued for the Rawlins RMP revision FEIS''. Any such 
decision will be in accordance with regulatory requirements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Eldon 
Allison, Project Manager, 1300 North Third Street, P.O. Box 2407, 
Rawlins, Wyoming 82301. Mr. Allison may also be reached by telephone at 
(307) 328-4291, or by sending an electronic message to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df9ab3bbb0b1809eb3b3b6acb0b19fbdb3b2f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="67220b03080938260b0b0e14080927050b0a49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

Deborah Rawhouser,
Group Manager, Planning Assessment and Community Support.
[FR Doc. 05-20084 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6377

CHIVALRY MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ORLANDO F. HUDSON, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court Judge; MATTHEW 

COOK, Attorney at Law; CHRIS J. VERMILLION, Detective; DAWN Y. 

BAXTON, Chief Public Defender - 14th District,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00688-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: December 27, 2023

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chivalry Moore, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6377 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Chivalry Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing Moore’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for seeking 

monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Moore v. Hudson, No. 1:22-cv-00688-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2023). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6377 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4930 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a partial exclusion 

from gross income of gain from the sale of non-principal residences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a partial exclusion from gross income of gain from the 

sale of non-principal residences. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALE OF NON-PRIN4 CIPAL RESIDENCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by inserting after section 121 the following new section: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4930 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 121A. EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALE OF NON-PRIN2 CIPAL RESIDENCE. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include 

4 gain from the sale or exchange of property if— 

5 ‘‘(1) such property is acquired during the 1- 

6 year period beginning on the date of the enactment 

7 of this section, 

8 ‘‘(2) such property is held by the taxpayer and 

9 used as a dwelling unit for a period of not less than 

10 2 years, and 

11 ‘‘(3) such property is located in a high fore12 closure rate area. 

13 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The amount of gain excluded 

14 from gross income under subsection (a) with respect to 

15 any sale or exchange shall not exceed $50,000 ($100,000 

16 in the case of a joint return). 

17 ‘‘(c) HIGH FORECLOSURE RATE AREA.—For pur18 poses of this section, the term ‘high foreclosure rate area’ 

19 means the 200 political subdivisions determined by the 

20 Secretary of the Treasury to have the highest rates of 

21 foreclosures, except that such 200 political subdivisions 

22 shall include at least 1 political subdivision of each State. 

23 ‘‘(d) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RULES.—Rules simi24 lar to the rules of subsections (d), (e), and (f) of section 

25 121 shall apply for purposes of this section.’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4930 IH

1 (b) PUBLICATION OF LIST OF HIGH FORECLOSURE

2 AREAS.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the en3 actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or the 

4 Secretary’s designee) shall publish the list of the 200 polit5 ical subdivisions determined to have the highest fore6 closure rates under section 121A(c) of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986, as added by this section. 

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

10 is amended by inserting after the time relating to section 

11 121 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 121A. Exclusion of gain from sale of non-principal residence.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES SUMNER LEE

No. 7011SC104

(Filed 24 June 1970)

Weapons and Firearms— machine gun, submachine gun or like weapon

Weapon described in a warrant as “a Universal Caliber 30 Ml Carbine, Serial No. 135258, capable of firing thirty-one (31) shots, by successive *602pulling of the trigger” is not a “machine gun, submachine gun or other like weapon” within the meaning of G.S. 14-409.

Gkaham, J., dissents.

Appeal by the State from *McKinnon, J.,*27 October 1969 Session, Lee Superior Court.

Defendant was charged in a warrant with the unlawful possession of a machine gun or sub-machine gun or other like weapon, to wit: a Universal Caliber 30 Ml Carbine, Serial No. 135258, capable of firing thirty-one (31) shots, by the successive pulling of the trigger. G.S. 14-409. The offense was alleged to have occurred on or about 2 September 1969. Defendant was tried in District Court on 9 September 1969, and from a verdict of guilty appealed to the Superior Court for trial *de novo.*

*■*When the case was called for trial in Superior Court on 28 October 1969, defendant moved to quash the warrant because: (1) the weapon described in the warrant was not such a weapon as was covered by the statute; and (2) as applied to defendant the statute (G.S. 14-409) was void for vagueness. The trial judge ruled that the weapon as described in the warrant was not a “machine gun, sub-machine gun or other like weapon” within the meaning of G.S. 14-409. Based upon this ruling the trial judge quashed the warrant, an^; the. State appealed.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Staff Attorney Jacobs for the State.*

*No appearance for defendant.*

BROCK, J.

We have examined G.S. 14-409 and the warrant under which defendant was charged in this case, and we agree with the ruling of the trial judge.

Affirmed.

Britt, J., concurs.

Graham, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 3, 2017/s/ R. Kipp deVeerR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: May 3, 2017/s/ Penni F. RollPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-4.2



 EXHIBIT 4.2 

 

			
	NUMBER	  	SHARES
	*****	  	*****

 ZIONS BANCORPORATION 
 TOTAL AUTHORIZED: 300,893 SHARES 
 Series I Fixed/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock 
 WITHOUT PAR VALUE 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT                      is the registered holder
of              Shares of Series I Fixed/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this      day of              A.D.
20    . 
 UPON REQUEST, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER A FULL STATEMENT OF THE
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK (INCLUDING ALL SERIES THEREOF) OF THE CORPORATION. 
 UNLESS THIS CERTIFICATE IS PRESENTED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION (“DTC”), TO ZIONS BANCORPORATION OR ITS AGENT FOR REGISTRATION OF
TRANSFER, EXCHANGE, OR PAYMENT, AND ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED IS REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF CEDE & CO. OR IN SUCH OTHER NAME AS IS REQUESTED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF DTC (AND ANY PAYMENT IS MADE TO CEDE & CO. OR TO SUCH OTHER ENTITY AS
IS REQUESTED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL INASMUCH AS THE REGISTERED OWNER HEREOF, CEDE & CO., HAS AN INTEREST HEREIN. 

For value received,                      hereby sell,
assign and transfer unto              Shares represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint              Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated              A.D. 20     

In presence of
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”), I, David L. Richter,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ David L. Richter    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | David L. Richter        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Dated:  November 14, 2016

 

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4956 

To direct the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to modify the approval 

of any drug containing controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride to limit 

such approval to use for the relief of severe-only instead of moderateto-severe pain, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mrs. BONO MACK (for herself, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

DUNCAN, Mr. MACK, Mr. WHITFIELD, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to modify 

the approval of any drug containing controlled-release 

oxycodone hydrochloride to limit such approval to use 

for the relief of severe-only instead of moderate-to-severe 

pain, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Oxy Abuse Act 

5 of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4956 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITING APPROVAL OF DRUGS CONTAINING CON2 TROLLED-RELEASE OXYCODONE HYDRO3 CHLORIDE TO USE FOR RELIEF OF SEVERE4 ONLY PAIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of 

7 Food and Drugs shall take such actions as may be nec8 essary— 

9 (1) to modify the approval of any drug con10 taining controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride 

11 under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

12 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) to limit such approval 

13 to use for the relief of severe-only instead of mod14 erate-to-severe pain; and 

15 (2) to limit any subsequent approval of a drug 

16 containing controlled-release oxycodone hydro17 chloride under such section to use for the relief of 

18 severe-only pain. 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Any modification required by 

20 subsection (a)(1) shall apply to drugs introduced or deliv21 ered for introduction into interstate commerce on or after 

22 the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Becoming Art Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
       Company.

Date: April 12, 2005


/s/ Michael Hanson
------------------------------------
Michael Hanson
Principal Financial Officer