alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
      Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Leslie Hudson, hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV Pharmaceutical,
      Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Leslie Hudson


------------------------------------------------------------------------





Leslie
      Hudson


Director,
      Chief Executive Officer and President


March
      14,
      2006








**Certification
      by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
      Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV Pharmaceutical,
      Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Barbara
      Duncan


------------------------------------------------------------------------





Barbara
      Duncan


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      14,
      2006





These
      certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act,
      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
      reference.
#### C. K. Brownell, *Appellant,*v. J. W. Walton, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 16, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 28, 1928.

*66*Farmer & Grantham,*for Appellant;

*McCune, Casey, Hiaasen & Fleming,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Wi-iiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
IN RE: E.D.

125PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 6, 2018

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for E.D.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of November 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of November 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 17th day of December 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### In the Interest of D.P. and C.P.

No. ED 81843.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 20, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14, 2003.

*839Celeste Leritz Endicott, Webster Groves, MO, for Appellant.

Dorothy E. Schuehat, St. Louis, MO, for Guardian ad Litem.

Lance Christian Bretsnyder, Kevin Lake, Clayton, MO, for Respondent-Juvenile Officer.

Before: MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

C.H. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights. Mother argues the trial court erred in terminating her rights as there was insufficient evidence to support the findings and further it was not in the best interest of the children. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(d)

               CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                       AND WILLIAM MCNERNEY AND/OR REV-TECH

Effective April 1, 1999 and for a period of one year subject to review after
that time.

Power Technology, Inc. will pay a consulting fee in the amount of $5,000.00
per month. Payment to be made in the form of restricted stock of Power
Technology (PWTC).

The stock shall be issued on a quarterly basis and issued within ten days
after the quarter end.

The value of the stock shall be computed at a dollar value equal to 85% of
the lowest bid trading price during the calendar quarter.


Power Technology, Inc

By: /s/ LEE A. BALAK
   -----------------------------
        Lee A. Balak, President

/s/ WILLIAM MCNERNEY
--------------------------------
William McNerney and/or RevTec
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


10-K




| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                                                                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
    expressed in the Report.



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ Edward F. Crawford

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Name: Edward F. Crawford                   
| | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ Richard P. Elliott

| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| |                                                  
| | Name: Richard P. Elliott                         
| | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY PINKNEY

No. 7612SC37

(Filed 2 April 1975)

1. Criminal Law § 149— arrest of judgment — appeal by State

An order for arrest of judgment is based upon the insufficiency of the indictment or other defect appearing on the face of the record and is appealable by the State. G.S. 15-179.

*3172. Criminal Law § 149— setting aside verdict for insufficient evidence — appeal by State

The State may not appeal from an order setting aside the verdict in a criminal case on the ground that it is not supported by the evidence.

Appeal by the State from *Smith, Judge.*Judgment entered 9 August 1974 in Superior Court, Hoke County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 19 March 1975.

Defendant was indicted on a charge of armed robbery. He pleaded not guilty and was tried before a jury, which found him guilty as charged. The court entered judgment imposing a prison sentence. Defendant moved to set aside the judgment on grounds that there was insufficient evidence upon which to convict. The court entered an order for arrest of judgment, and the State appealed.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General James E. Magner, Jr., for the State.*

*James D. Little, Public Defender, Twelfth Judicial District, for defendant appellee.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

[1, 2] An order for arrest of judgment is based upon the insufficiency of the indictment or other defect appearing on the face of the record. *State v. Davis,*282 N.C. 107, 191 S.E. 2d 664 (1972) ; *State v. Fletcher,*279 N.C. 85, 181 S.E. 2d 405 (1971). It is appealable by the State. G.S. 15-179. A judgment of nonsuit, on the other hand, has the force and effect of verdict of not guilty. G.S. 15-173; *State v. Ballard,*280 N.C. 479, 186 S.E. 2d 372 (1972). The State may not appeal.

Although referred to by the trial court as an order for arrest of judgment, the order appealed from is in fact an order setting aside the verdict on grounds that it is not supported by the evidence. This Court is without power to review such an order.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Parker concur.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. US Precious Metals, Inc. Dated: October 20, 2011  /s/ Jack WagentiJack Wagenti(Chief Financial Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE v. Michael Odell FAIR

308P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Michael Odell Fair, for Fair, Michael Odell.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of September 2018 by Defendant for Notice of Motion to Intervene an Estoppel and Rebuttal to Quittance Claim:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Clay Ammerman and Erin Ammer man v

. Johnny Wilson and Angela

Wilson

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00 448

- CV

Trial court case number: 16

- 01

- 23529

Trial court: 506th District Court of Waller County

Date motion filed: September 27, 2018

Party filing motion: appellants, Clay and Erin Ammerman

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENI ED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings

, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale , Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey

Date: November 29, 2018
<Page>

EXHIBIT 21.1

<Table>
<Caption>
                                           STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
     EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS                   INCORPORATION OR
      SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER                      ORGANIZATION
===================================     ========================================
<S>                                                  <C>
Blaya Inc.                                            Delaware
Oro Spanish Broadcasting Inc.                         California
Radio Unica Network, Inc.                             Delaware
Radio Unica of Chicago, Inc.                          Delaware
Radio Unica of Chicago License Corp.                  Delaware
Radio Unica of Dallas, Inc.                           Delaware
Radio Unica of Dallas License Corp.                   Delaware
Radio Unica of Denver, Inc.                           Delaware
Radio Unica of Denver License Corp.                   Delaware
Radio Unica of Fresno, Inc.                           Delaware
Radio Unica of Fresno License Corp.                   Delaware
Radio Unica of Houston License Corp.                  Delaware
Radio Unica of Los Angeles, Inc.                      Delaware
Radio Unica of Los Angeles License Corp.              Delaware
Radio Unica of McAllen, Inc.                          Delaware
Radio Unica of McAllen License Corp.                  Delaware
Radio Unica of Miami, Inc.                            Delaware
Radio Unica of Miami License Corp.                    Delaware
Radio Unica of New York, Inc.                         Delaware
Radio Unica of New York License Corp.                 Delaware
Radio Unica of Phoenix, Inc.                          Delaware
Radio Unica of Phoenix License Corp.                  Delaware
Radio Unica of Sacramento, Inc.                       Delaware
Radio Unica of Sacramento License Corp.               Delaware
Radio Unica of San Antonio, Inc.                      Delaware
Radio Unica of San Antonio License Corp.              Delaware
Radio Unica of San Diego, Inc.                        Delaware
Radio Unica of San Diego License Corp.                Delaware
Radio Unica of San Francisco Inc.                     Delaware
Radio Unica of San Francisco License Corp.            Delaware
Radio Unica Sales Corp.                               Florida
Radio Unica of Tucson, Inc.                           Delaware
Radio Unica of Tucson License Corp.                   Delaware
Mass Promotions, Inc.                                 Delaware
</Table>

                                       71
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068148
<NAME> PARK OHIO INDUSTRIES INC/OH
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,803
<INVENTORY>                                    150,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,790
<PP&E>                                         160,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 489,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,203
<BONDS>                                        237,483
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   489,554
<SALES>                                        551,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               551,793
<CGS>                                          455,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  455,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 13A-14 OF THE  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ETS Payphones, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
May 13, 2005

| |  | /s/GUY A. LONGOBARDOGuy A. Longobardo
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 06, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 06, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0019. BURKE BRADFORD CARROLL v. JENNIFER JOYCE CARROLL.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DARLENE M. BROUGHTON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3063

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0752-13-0101-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Darlene M. Broughton moves for additional time. The 

court notes that no further submissions are due and thus 

there are no deadlines to be extended. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 14-3063 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2014
2 BROUGHTON v. MSPB

The motion is denied. All future motions will be 

deferred to the merits panel because the case is ready for 

the calendar. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 14-3063 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [Funding Opportunity Number: CE05-020]

                    A notice announcing the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2005 funds for cooperative agreements to assess the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions designed to change community characteristics and social processes to reduce rates of youth violence perpetration and victimization was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 30, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 250, pages 78419-78426.                

The notice is amended as follows: 

                    On page 78422, Column 2, Section IV.1.                     *Address to Request Application Package,*                     delete the first sentence and replace with “To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398 (OMB number 0925-0001 rev. 9/2004).                

Dated: January 28, 2005.

William P. Nichols,

Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 05-2038 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: SK Plymouth, LLC and SK E&P Operations America, LLC and Joey 

Jun v. Jean Elizabeth Simmons

Appellate case number: 01-19-00433-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-03233

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

On August 26, 2019, the Court issued an order that mentioned appellants’ untimely June 

10, 2019 notice of appeal and requested a motion for extension of time explaining the delay in 

filing the notice of appeal. 

The clerk’s office has now advised that a motion for extension of time to file the notice of 

appeal was tendered by appellants before the letter of assignment was received. The motion was 

mistakenly not posted to the appeal until August 27, 2019. The Court grants the motion. 

All other deadlines set out in the order of August 26, 2019, remain effective.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Richard Hightower______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __August 28, 2019_