alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Review of Institutional National 
Research Service Award (T32) and NRSA Short-Term Research Training 
(T35)
    Date: November 15, 2005
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Nat. Inst. of Environmental Health Sciences, Building 
101, Rodbell Auditorium, 111 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Leroy Worth, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30/Room 3171, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, 919/541-0670, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 90.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation-Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances-Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response in 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing; National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 14, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21132 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

t0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147521

SPE UTILITY CONTRACTORS, L.L.C., Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 147521

COA: 310885

Tax Tribunal: 00-432073

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| 1.   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 9, 2010 | By: /s/ John A. Kite                 |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                 | John A. Kite                         |
|                 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |                                 |
| Date: August 9, 2010 | By: /s/ Daniel R. Sink               |
|                 | Daniel R. Sink                       |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer              |
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-42816)  pertaining  to  the  1998 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan, 1992 Stock Option Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Option Purchase Plan
of  Implant Sciences of our report dated August 23, 2002 (except for Note 16, as
to  which the date is October 7, 2002), with respect to the financial statements
of  Implant Sciences Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended June 30, 2002.




                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Boston,  Massachusetts
October  14,  2002


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6533

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ORILLION CRADDOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00049-REP-1; 3:16-cv-00183-REP)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orillion Craddock, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Orillion Craddock appeals the district court’s order 

treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Craddock, No. 3:08-cr-00049-REP-1 (E.D. 

Va. Mar. 23, 2016).

Additionally, we construe Craddock’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 

(4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on 

either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive 

to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, 

that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Craddock’s claims do not satisfy either of 

these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion.
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.
    Name: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (ACSBE) (<greek-i>1171).
    Date and Time: November 3, 2005 8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 4, 2005 8 
a.m.-12:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Stafford II Building, Suite 
555, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Mr. Tyrone Jordan Office of the Assistant Director, 
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 905, Arlington, VA 
22230, 703-292-8741.
    Summary Minutes: May be obtained from contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to 
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate programs and 
activities.
    Agenda: Discussion on issues, role and future direction of the 
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.

    Dated: October 13, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20863 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61163-61164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21001]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, Request 
for Comments; Renewal of an Approved Information Collection Activity, 
Procedures for Non-Federal Navigation Facilities

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The information kept is used by the FAA as proof that non-
Federal navigation facilities are maintained within certain specified 
tolerances.

DATES: Please submit comments by November 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Street on (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
    Title: Procedures for Non-Federal Navigation Facilities.
    Type of Request: Renewal of an approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0014.
    Forms(s): None.
    Affected Public: A total of 2413 navigation facility operators.

[[Page 61164]]

    Frequency: The information is conducted on an as-needed basis.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Response: Approximately 14 hours per 
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 33,116 hours annually.
    Abstract: The non-Federal navigation facilities are electrical/
electronic aids to air navigation which are purchased, installed, 
operated, and maintained by an entity other than the FAA and are 
available for use by the flying public. These aids may be located at 
unattended remote sites or airport terminals. The information kept is 
used by the FAA as proof that the facility is maintained within certain 
specified tolerances.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2005.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Information Systems and 
Technology Services Staff, ABA-20.
[FR Doc. 05-21001 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of eCOST.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Brent Hirokawa, Vice President of Accounting and Controller of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of
my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Brent Hirokawa                                        
|                        |  |  |  | Brent Hirokawa Vice President of Accounting and Controller
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD A. CANATELLA,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 14

- 73457

Tax Ct. No. 13787

- 12

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Rich ard A. Canatella, an attorney, appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s

decision, after a bench trial, upholding the determination of income tax

deficiencies and penalties. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1).

We review for an abuse of discretion t he denial of a recusal motion. Glick v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously co ncludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 73457

Edwards , 803 F.3d 505, 508 ( 9th Cir. 2015 )

. We affirm.

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Canatella’s motion for

recusal because Canatella failed to establish any ground for recusal. See Nobles v.

C omm’r , 105 F.3d 436, 438 (9th Cir. 1997) (explaining that the “mandatory

recusal provisions in section 455 do not apply to tax court judges ,” and noting the

absence of a basis in statute or court rule for requiring tax court j udges’ recusal);

see also U

nited States v. Johnson , 610 F.3d 1138, 1147 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting

forth grounds for recusal including “whether a reasonable person with knowledge

of all the facts would conclude that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be

questioned ” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Canatella’s contention that the Tax

Court demonstrated bias, partiality, or otherwise violated Canatella’s d ue p rocess

rights.

We do not consider arguments, allegations, or evidence raise d for the first

time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009);

Kirshner v. Uniden Corp. of Am.

, 842 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1988).

The Commissioner’s motion to strike extra

- record material a nd arguments

(Docket Entry No. 26) is granted.

AFFIRMED.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42837

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

WILLIAM V

. WOODS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 723

Filed: November 19, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Boundary County. Hon. Barbara A. Buchanan , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

William V. Woods pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine and possession of

heroin. Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c)(1). Following his plea, Woods was sentenced to consecutive

unified sentences of five years with one and one

- half years determinate and the district court

retained jurisdiction.

Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished juris diction.

Woods filed a Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentences, which the district court granted by

ordering that Woods’ sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively. Woods appeals,

claiming that th e district court abused its discretion by relinquishing jurisdiction

. Woods2

received his requested relief in the Rule 35 motion and makes no claim for further redu ction of

his sentences.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the

information b efore it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Woods

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

T he order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Trezac International Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul Taylor, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Registrant.

/s/  Paul Taylor
----------------------------
     Paul Taylor
     Chief Executive Officer
     Chief Financial Officer
     April 28, 2003

<PAGE>
Paula GLASGOW, Employee, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLEASE CORPORATION, Employer, and National Interstate Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA18-348

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41



                                 PULITZER INC.
                          RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD


This Certificate sets forth the terms of the restricted stock unit award made
by Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company") to Robert C. Woodworth ("Executive") on
December 11, 2000 (the "Award Date") pursuant to the Pulitzer Inc. 1999 Key
Employees' Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

         1.   Number of Shares Covered by Award. The number of units ("Units")
covered by this award is 25,000, each Unit being the notional equivalent of one
share of common stock of the Company. The Company has credited the 25,000 Units
to a bookkeeping account maintained by the Company in the Executive's name,
effective as of the Award Date. The number of Units credited to the Executive's
account will be adjusted to reflect capital changes, if any, in accordance with
the terms of the Plan.

         2.   Vesting. The Units covered by this award will vest at the end of
three years from the Award Date, subject to the Executive's continuing
employment or service with the Company, or, if earlier, upon the occurrence of
an event which would cause the acceleration of vesting of the restricted stock
unit award made to the Executive under his employment agreement with the Company
dated December 18, 1998.

         3.   Dividend Equivalents. The Company will make cash payments to the
Executive equal to the dividends that would have been paid on the shares
represented by the Units credited to the Executive's account as if the
Executive owned those shares outright. The dividend equivalent payments will be
made as soon as practicable after dividends are paid on the Company's
outstanding shares.

         4.   Distribution of Shares. If and when the Units become vested, the
Company will transfer to the Executive a number of shares of Common Stock equal
to the number of Units then credited to the Executive's account in full
satisfaction of the Executive's interest hereunder, subject, however, to such
deferral requirements as the Company may impose in order to avoid a limitation
of its income tax deduction attributable to such transfer by reason of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

         5.   Withholding. All amounts payable to the Executive hereunder,
whether in cash or in kind, will be subject to applicable withholding
requirements.


Accepted and Agreed to by:                            PULITZER, INC.

/s/ Robert C. Woodworth                               By: /s/ Ronald H. Ridgway
------------------------------                           ----------------------
Robert C. Woodworth