alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Dennis KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2514

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 1, 1972.

*1244E. Howard McCaleb, III, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U. S. Atty., Michael H. Ellis, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and RO-NEY, Circuit Judges.

*

  Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from conviction of obstructing correspondence and forging and uttering a United States Treasury cheek, violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1701 and 495.

After the appeal was docketed, appellant's court-appointed trial attorney was granted leave to withdraw because appellant desired to question the quality of his legal representation below. We appointed new counsel, who has also filed a motion to be relieved of his appointment, on the ground that the appeal is frivolous, accompanied by a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed.2d 493. Advised of his right to present issues which show merit to the appeal, appellant has filed a pro se brief.

The issues presented in both briefs are: (1) insufficiency of evidence; (2) error in imposing sentences exceeding one year, since appellant was charged by information rather than indictment; (3) deprivation of fair and impartial trial because a member of the jury committed perjury by denying that he had been acquainted with the defendant; and (4) ineffective representation by failure of counsel to challenge the juror in question and failure to subpoena defense witnesses requested by appellant.

 We conclude that the appeal is frivolous. The first two errors assigned lack even arguable merit. As to the second, appellant waived his right to indictment, and there is no challenge to validity of the waiver. The third and fourth are based on factual allegations outside the record, and may not be raised on direct appeal.

*1245We dismiss the appeal as frivolous under Local Rule 20, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See United States v. Mills, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1397; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; Lemus v. Government of the Canal Zone, 5th Cir. 1971, 443 F.2d 23.

Appeal dismissed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 54 1

. DI ANE PARRI S et a l

. v . THOMAS COHEN, ADMI NI STRATOR FOR ESTATE FRONI CE PRI CE.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a di s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad vers e ru l i n g in t hat co u rt , defen d an t s Di an e Parri s an d Darrel l Pri ce ap p eal ed to

t h e s t at e co u rt , wh i ch en t ered j u d g m en t i n fav o r o f p l ai n t i ff Th om as Co hen

. Parri s

an d Pri ce t hen ap p eal ed d i rect l y t o t h i s Co urt . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n. An ap p eal fro m a st at e co urt ord er d i s p o s i n g o f a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a

m ag i s t rat e co u rt d eci s i on m u st b e i n i t i at ed b y fi l i n g an ap p li cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1 ); S t r a ch a n v. Mer i t o r Mt g

. Co r p

. Ea s t , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 1 9) (1 9 9 5 ). Parri s an d Pri ce ’s f a i l u re to co m

pl y wi t h t h e
req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s of ju ri s d i ct i on o ver t h i s a p p e a l
, wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/04/2016 November 04, 2016
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
Kevin E. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin E. ShafferName: Kevin E. ShafferDate: August 8, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael J. Arougheti, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   November 5, 2013  |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/ Michael J.   Arougheti      |   |
| Michael J.   Arougheti          |   |
| Chief Executive   Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
|                            |   |
| Dated:   November 5, 2013  |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/ Penni F. Roll               |   |
| Penni F. Roll                   |   |
| Chief Financial   Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 75-1856.

#### Ponciano et al. *v.*United Farm Workers Organizing Committee et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Now Auto Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned, Scott Miller, Chief Executive Officer/ Financial Officer and Chief
      Operating Officer of the Company, certify in my capacities as officer of the
      Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.







By:
      /s/
      Scott Miller


-------------------------------


Scott
      Miller


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      14,
      2008





/s/
      Faith
      Forbis


--------------------------------


Faith
      Forbis


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      14,
      2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-035]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  October 21, 2005 at 11 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
1. Agenda for future meetings: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-442-443 and 731-TA-1095-1097 (Preliminary) (Certain 
Line Paper School Supplies from China, India, and Indonesia)--briefing 
and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination to the Secretary of Commerce on or before October 24, 
2005; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted 
to the Secretary of Commerce on or before October 31, 2005.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: none
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 11, 2005.

    By order of the Commission:
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20794 Filed 10-13-05; 11:07 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4840 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4840 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLARENCE D. LUMPKIN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Co4 lumbus, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clar5 ence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4840 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Columbus, Ohio, as the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin al Service located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 609 V

UNPUBLISHED

CARL FELTS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 8, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Simina Vourlis, Law Offices of Simina Vourlis, Colu mbus, OH , for petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On April 24, 2019

, Carl Felts filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) as a

result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered on October 21, 20 16 . Petit ion at 1

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 5, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, R espondent concluded that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set

forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretati on. Id. at

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2 11 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for

compensation under the Vaccine Act

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

No. 73301-0-1 es>

I

rip?

<J*rn*r\

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

SALLYEA MCCLINTON,

Appellant.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ~ <&*

FILED: March 7, 2016

Verellen, A.C.J. — Sallyea McClinton appeals from an order imposing 300 days'

confinement for five willful violations of his community custody conditions. McClinton

contends the trial court's reliance on hearsay statements, absent findings of good cause or

reliability, violated his right to due process. Because this issue is moot, and McClinton

provides no argument that the public interest exception applies, we dismiss this appeal.

FACTS

In 1997, McClinton was convicted of first degree rape while armed with a deadly

weapon, first degree attempted rape, and first degree burglary. The trial court imposed a

sentence of 226 months followed by two years of community custody. Upon his release

from prison, McClinton was required to abide by several community custody conditions.

In 2013, McClinton began his term of community custody. In 2014, McClinton was

alleged to have violated five community custody conditions. At McClinton's sentence

modification hearing on February 19, 2015, his community corrections officer John Chinn
No. 73301-0-1/2

testified. Officer Chinn's testimony included hearsay statements supporting the alleged

violations.

The trial court found McClinton had violated five community custody conditions.

The trial court imposed 60 days for each violation, to be served consecutively, for a total of

300 days' confinement. McClinton has served his confinement. He was released on

August 3, 2015.

McClinton appeals the trial court's sentence modification order.

ANALYSIS

McClinton contends the trial court's reliance on hearsay statements, absent findings

of good cause or reliability, violated his right to due process under the standards

enunciated in State v. Abd-Rahmaan.1 But this issue is moot. McClinton has already

served the term of confinement imposed for these violations of his community custody

conditions, so we cannot provide any meaningful relief.2 McClinton provides no argument

that the public interest exception applies.

We dismiss this appeal as moot.

WE CONCUR:

£^///

1 154 Wn.2d 280, 111 P.3d 1157 (2005).

2 In re Detention of Cross, 99 Wn.2d 373, 376-77, 662 P.2d 828 (1983) ("A case is

moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief.").
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Fairgrove LLC
Flagstaff Publishing Co.
Hanford Sentinel, Inc.
HomeChoice, LLC
HSTAR LLC
Kauai Publishing Co.
Napa Valley Publishing Co.
NLPC LLC
Northern Illinois Publishing Co.
Northern Lakes Publishing Co.
NVPC LLC
Pantagraph Publishing Co.
Pulitzer Missouri Newspapers, Inc.
Pulitzer Network Systems LLC
Pulitzer Newspapers, Inc.
Pulitzer Technologies, Inc.
Pulitzer Utah Newspapers, Inc.
Santa Maria Times, Inc.
SHTP LLC
SOPC LLC
Southwestern Oregon Publishing Co.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch LLC
Star Publishing Company
STL Distribution Services, LLC
Suburban Journals of Greater St. Louis LLC
Ynez Corporation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3216-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-3216-EM), dated September 2, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 24, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Sandy Coachman, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency. 

This action terminates my appointment of Gary Jones as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 05-20774 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 491 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 491

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive non-Federal share 
requirements for certain transportation programs and activities through 
                          September 30, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2009

  Mr. Welch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive non-Federal share 
requirements for certain transportation programs and activities through 
                          September 30, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NON-FEDERAL SHARE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTATION 
              PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Temporary Waiver.--For the period specified in subsection (b), 
the Secretary of Transportation shall waive any requirement that would 
otherwise require a State or local government to contribute non-Federal 
funds toward the cost of a covered transportation program or activity.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a 
covered transportation program or activity carried out by a State or 
local government during the period beginning on the date of enactment 
of this Act and ending on September 30, 2009.
    (c) Covered Transportation Program or Activity Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``covered transportation program or activity'' means 
a program or activity for which funds are authorized by the Safe, 
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act, A Legacy 
for Users (119 Stat. 1144 et seq.) or an amendment made by that Act.
    (d) Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to prohibit a State or local government from contributing 
non-Federal funds toward the cost of a covered transportation program 
or activity.
                                 <all>
```