alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
Kevin E. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin E. ShafferName: Kevin E. ShafferDate: May 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
#### The State ex rel. Gustavus A. Doren *v.*John F. Oglevee, Auditor of State.

Application for a mandamus to compel the Auditor of State to issue a warrant on the state treasurer for $3,000, in favor of the institution for feeble-minded youth, on an order drawn by said Doren as its superintendent and financial officer, and approved by a majority of its trustees.

*W. J. Gilmore*for the relator.

*G. K.*Nash, attorney general, for the auditor of state.

By the Court.

The provisions of the first, second and third chapters of the fifth title of the Revised Statutes, aj>ply to the institution for feeble-minded youth; these provisions require the appointment of a financial officer as well as a superintendent; and the same person cannot perform the duties of both offices in drawing money from the treasury under section 654.

*Application overruled.*
## 

EXHIBIT 21.1   Subsidiaries of ACL

American
Commercial Barge Line LLC
American Commercial Lines Funding Corporation
American Commercial Lines International LLC
American Commercial Terminals LLC
American Commercial TerminalsMemphis LLC
ACBL Argentina, Ltd.
ACBL de Venezuela, C.A.
ACBL del Paraguay S.A.
ACBL Hidrovias S.A.
ACBL Hidrovias, Ltd.
ACBL Venezuela, Ltd.
ACL Capital Corp.
Bolivar Terminal Co., Inc.
Breen TAS LLC
Bullard TAS LLC
Cinco Holdings Ltd.
Corumba Holdings Ltd.
Global Materials Services LLC
Houston Fleet LLC
Jeffboat LLC
Lemont Harbor & Fleeting Services LLC
Louisiana Dock Company LLC
Orinoco TASA LLC
Orinoco TASV LLC
Puertos de la Hidrovia Ltd.
River Terminal Properties LP
Shelton TAS LLC
Waterway Communications System LLC

76



## QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Robert M. Doyle, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of Coinmach Service Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
 

 
  audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 4, 2006 /s/ Robert M. Doyle Robert M. Doyle    Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 48 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known 

as the Lacey Act, to add certain species of carp to the list of injurious 

species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as the Lacey Act, to add certain species 

of carp to the list of injurious species that are prohibited 

from being imported or shipped. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asian Carp Prevention 

5 and Control Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 48 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF CARP TO THE LIST OF IN2 JURIOUS SPECIES THAT ARE PROHIBITED 

3 FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED. 

4 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by inserting after ‘‘Dreissena polymorpha;’’ the 

6 following: ‘‘of the black carp of the species 

7 Mylopharyngodon piceus; of the bighead carp of the spe8 cies Hypophthalmichthys nobilis; of the silver carp of the 

9 species Hypophthalmichthys molitrix; of the largescale sil10 ver carp of the species Hypophthalmichthys harmandi;’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
STATE v. Jeffrey Tryon COLLINGTON

290PA15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 2019

Christopher J. Heaney, Attorney at Law, for Collington, Jeffrey Tryon

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Greg Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of January 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of January 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 6th day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,290)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,287
<PP&E>                                         889,550
<DEPRECIATION>                               (329,773)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (132,072)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,096
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               739,136
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  664,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,048)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,658
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,737)
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,970
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE v. Douglas Wayne STANALAND

333P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Douglas Wayne Stanaland, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for Stanaland, Douglas Wayne.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of October 2018 by Defendant to Take Judicial Notice:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
EXHIBIT
32.1


Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 27, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




1.           the
Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 10, 2008
            /s/Gary
      E.
      Robinette
              Gary
      E. Robinette
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              Ply
      Gem Holdings, Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Brickhouse, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 836]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered December 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The complainant identified defendant minutes after the robbery and the police recovered from defendant’s possession property stolen during the robbery.

Defendant’s challenges to the People’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged portions of the summation generally constituted fair comment on the evidence in response to issues raised by defendant and that, in any event, the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, *lv denied*91 NY2d 976; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,651-01

EX PARTE JHONTAE LEMARK HUDSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1416770-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to

twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hudson

v. State, No. 14-16-00581-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14 Dist.], Nov. 14, 2017). Applicant filed th

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel

failed to investigate, failed to obtain exculpatory evidence, and failed to call expert witnesses. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466

U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
2

forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any

means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of

counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 15, 2020

Do not publish
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C.
Woodworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  -------------------
                                  Robert C. Woodworth
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  March 4, 2004


                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Mark
Joseph  Corrao,  acting in the  capacity as the Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  StrikeForce  Technologies,  Inc.  and  will be  retained  by
StrikeForce  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





                  /s/ Mark Joseph Corrao
                  ----------------------
                  Mark Joseph Corrao
                  Chief Financial Officer

                  August 19, 2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134536 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134536 COA: 278767 Washtenaw CC: 85-019976-FC EDWARD N. CARLT ON, a/k/a THOMAS E. SETH, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant's motion for relief from judgment is pr ohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007
Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

 Infosys Technologies Limited 

 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-32196) on Form S-8 of Infosys Technologies Limited of our report dated April 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Infosys Technologies Limited as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule II, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, which report appears in the March 31, 2006 annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited. 

KPMG

Bangalore , India   April 28, 2006
## **Exhibit 32.1**

##  

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC.**

**UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBlue Ridge Paper Products Inc. (the “Company”) certify pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date:  May 24, 2005

 
| ** ** | ** **                            | **/S/   RICHARD A. LOZYNIAK** | ** ** | ** ** |
|------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| ** ** | **Richard A. Lozyniak**               | ** **                         |
| ** ** | President and Chief Executive Officer | ** **                         |

 
| ** ** | ** **              | **/S/   JOHN B. WADSWORTH** | ** ** | ** ** |
|------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------|------------|------------|
| ** ** | **John B. Wadsworth**   | ** **                       |
| ** ** | Chief Financial Officer | ** **                       |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-200-1120-PH]


Notice of November Resource Advisory Council Meeting To Be Held 
in Twin Falls District, ID

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the intent to hold a Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC) meeting in the Twin Falls District of Idaho on Tuesday, 
November 29, 2005. The meeting will be held in the Cedar Conference 
Room at the Red Lion Canyon Springs Hotel, 1357 Blue Lakes Boulevard 
North, in Twin Falls, Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Twin Falls District Resource Advisory 
Council consists of the standard fifteen members residing throughout 
south central Idaho. Meeting agenda items will include multiple sub-
group reports concerning energy, Blaine County Airport Relocation, and 
ongoing litigation. A significant portion of the session will also 
include familiarization for new incoming members. Other potential 
topics may also arise and a public comment period will be held 
following lunch.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sky Buffat, Twin Falls District, 
Idaho, 2536 Kimberly Road, Twin Falls, Idaho, 83301, (208) 735-2068.

    Dated: October 11, 2005.
Howard Hedrick,
Twin Falls District Manager.
[FR Doc. 05-20688 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy John CLARK, Defendant.

No. COA17-1356

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR IN PART.