alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Rescission of Order of 
Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

    License Number: 018765N.
    Name: PR Logistics Corporation.
    Address: Hato Tejas Industrial Park, Street C, Lot <greek-i>6, Hato 
Tejas, Bayamon, PR 00950.
    Order Published: FR: 10/25/05 (Volume 70, No. 164, Pg. 49922).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-20009 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tony Gerard DOUGLASS, Appellant.

No. 15201.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

March 2, 1972.

William H. Murphy, Jr. and Carroll & Murphy, Baltimore, Md., on brief for appellant.

George Beall, U. S. Atty., and John G. Sakellaris, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal from a conviction for refusal to submit to induction into the armed forces, Douglass claims that he should have been granted an exemption from service as a conscientious objector because of his beliefs as a Black Mus-*269Tim. Although Douglass never presented his claim to his local Selective Service Board, raising it for the first time on the day he was to have been inducted, both sides have sought to waive this procedural question. We need not accept the proffered waiver, however.

The identical procedural and substantive questions were both presented to this court in United States v. Al-Majied Muhammad, 364 F.2d 223. After consideration of the briefs, we affirm on the authority of the decision in *Muhammad.*

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                              SOLPOWER CORPORATION

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert D. Kohn, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that the Annual Report of Solpower Corporation on Form
10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solpower Corporation.





Date: December 12, 2005


By: /s/ Robert D. Kohn
---------------------------------
Robert D. Kohn
Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1050

WAKE COUNTY NC HUMAN SERVICES , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv
- 00047

- BO )

Submitted : May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Scott Davis, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order den ying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wake Cty. Hum a n Servs. v. Da vis , No. 5:14

- cv
- 00047

- BO (E.D.N.C . Dec. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINICIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Julia A. Fratianne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/ Julia A. Fratianne
----------------------
Julia A. Fratianne, Treasurer and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       16
# United Stat es Court of Appeals For the First C ircuit

No. 04-2186 GREGORIO IGARTÚA de la ROSA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant.

ERRATA The memorandum and order of this court issued on May 12, 2005, should be amended as follows: On the cover s heet replace "Torruella, Selya, Lynch, Howard and Lip ez, Circuit Judges ." with "Torruella, Selya, Lynch, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges ."
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4999 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4999

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2010

 Mr. Garrett of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Posey, and Mr. 
   Duncan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reclaiming Individual Liberty Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    Section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Termination.--This section shall not apply with respect to 
any month beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Teresa Louise BOVA

No. COA18-413

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Report  of Aqua  Vie  Beverage  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
I, Thomas Gillespie>,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. the Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 19, 2002                    /s/ Thomas Gillespie
                                                 ------------------------
                                                 Thomas Gillespie
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2018

Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, For Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                           PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 ....................................    1999         1998         1997           1996           1995
                                        ----         ----         ----           ----           ----
<S>                                   <C>          <C>         <C>             <C>            <C>
Earnings from continuing operations
  before income taxes................  $28,608      $22,820      $19,199        $14,753        $12,913

Less capitalized interest............                (1,000)

Fixed charges........................   28,690       20,840       11,495          8,787          7,192
                                       -------      -------      -------        -------        -------

Earnings available for fixed
  charges............................  $57,298      $42,660      $30,694        $23,540        $20,105

Fixed charges:
Interest component
  of rent expense....................  $ 3,938      $ 2,352      $ 2,232        $ 1,584        $ 1,176

Interest expense.....................   24,752       17,488        9,101          6,947          5,911

Interest capitalized.................                 1,000

Amortization of deferred financing
  costs..............................       --(1)        --(1)       162            256            105
                                       -------      -------      -------        -------        -------

Total fixed charges..................  $28,690      $20,840      $11,495        $ 8,787        $ 7,192

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges............................      2.0x         2.0x         2.7x           2.7x           2.8x
</TABLE>

(1) Included in interest expense
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10(c). Addendum to Change In Control Program For The Chairman Of The
Board

                                   ADDENDUM TO
             CHANGE IN CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

         Admiralty Bank has implemented a Change in Control Program for the
Chairman of the Board (the "Chairman") of Admiralty Bank that will take effect
in the event of a Change in Control as defined in the Program. For the purposes
of this Addendum, all capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as
the defined terms in the Program. In addition to the current provisions of the
Program, the following shall be included in the Program:

         MEDICAL INSURANCE BENEFITS:

         If a Qualifying Event occurs during the Program Period, Admiralty Bank
         will pay to the Chairman and/or the Chairman's current spouse (as of
         the date hereof) medical insurance benefits consistent with the current
         medical insurance benefits currently provided to the Chairman and his
         current spouse. Such medical insurance benefits shall be paid to the
         Chairman and his current spouse until their death.

         In all other respects, the Program remains the same and in full force
         and effect as previously adopted.
#### Christopher GADSEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-3257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 9, 2003.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Christopher Gadsen appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Although we approve the trial court’s conclusion that Gadsen is not entitled to relief under *Heggs v. State,*759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), we reverse. Gadsen was habitualized for posession of cocaine, which is not among the enumerated felonies on which a defendant may be sentenced as a habitual felony offender. *See*§ 775.084(l)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). We therefore reverse Gadsen’s habitual felony offender sentence for possession of cocaine and remand to the trial court for resen-tencing according to the sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of his offense. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Achievers Magazine Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 16, 2007


/s/ Arto Tavukciyan
---------------------------------------
Arto Tavukciyan, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro

|
|
|
|

Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

March 31, 2008

|
|
|
|

Date

---
Exhibit
13.2






















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rajiv Bansal, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F
of Infosys Limited for the year ended March 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Limited.



|                      | /s/ RAJIV BANSAL                                    
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                     
|Date:
    May 9, 2014 | Rajiv Bansal
        Chief Financial
        Officer
SCPW-12-0000923
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

BARBARA ELLEN SHERRILL, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE DERRICK H.M. CHAN, Judge of the First Circuit Court, State of Hawai # i, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-12-0000676; PROBATE NO. 10-1-0254)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nacino, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioner Barbara Ellen Sherrill’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on October 29, 2012, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to the relief she seeks and a lack of alternative means to obtain such relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000923 30-NOV-2012 12:04 PM338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that

will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedure). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 30, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Edwin C. Nacino
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4720 

To provide for a 5 percent reduction in the rates of basic pay for Members 

of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a 5 percent reduction in the rates of basic 

pay for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taking Responsibility 

5 For Congressional Pay Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN RATES OF BASIC PAY FOR MEMBERS 

7 OF CONGRESS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of the first day of the 

9 first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4720 IH

1 1, 2011, the rate of basic pay for each Member of Con2 gress shall be reduced by 5 percent, rounded to the nearest 

3 multiple of $100 (or, if midway between multiples of $100, 

4 to the next higher multiple of $100). 

5 (b) PREEMPTION.—The adjustment under subsection 

6 (a) shall be in lieu of any adjustment which (but for this 

7 Act) might otherwise take effect, in the rates of basic pay 

8 for Members of Congress, in 2011. 

9 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

10 ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means an individual serving in a 

11 position under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 

12 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 

13 U.S.C. 31). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS