alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4984 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4984

  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 Tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-7(2)) 
is amended by striking ``if the descendant'' and all that follows 
through the end of the paragraph and inserting ``if the descendant is 
enrolled by the tribe''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4775 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4775

To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2010

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open and Transparent Smithsonian Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF OPEN GOVERNMENT STATUTES TO THE SMITHSONIAN 
              INSTITUTION.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions shall apply to the 
Smithsonian Institution:
            (1) Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).
            (2) Sections 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Privacy Act).
            (3) Sections 552b of title 5, United States Code (relating 
        to open meetings).
            (4) The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (b) Agency.--For purposes of each provision of law under subsection 
(b)--
            (1) the Smithsonian Institution shall be an agency; and
            (2) the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall be 
        the head of the agency.
    (c) Effective Date and Application.--
            (1) Effective date.--This section shall take effect on the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Application.--This section shall apply to--
                    (A) all actions taken by the Board of Regents of 
                the Smithsonian Institution or any officer or employee 
                of the Smithsonian Institution before, on, or after the 
                date of enactment of this Act;
                    (B) any record created before, on, or after that 
                date; and
                    (C) any meeting held before, on, or after that 
                date.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10180 and <greek-i>10181]


AL Disaster Number AL-00003

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1605-DR), dated August 
29, 2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Katrina.
    Incident Period: August 29, 2005 through September 26, 2005.
    Effective Date: October 5, 2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: October 28, 2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: May 29, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Alabama, dated August 29, 2005 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
Primary Counties:

    Marengo
Contiguous Counties:
    Alabama, Dallas

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

S. George Camp,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-20727 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.

Dated: March 29, 2004
                                          By /s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORD
                                            ------------------------------------
                                          Name: Edward F. Crawford
                                          Title: Chairman and Chief Executive
                                          Officer

                                          By /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT
                                            ------------------------------------
                                          Name: Richard P. Elliott
                                          Title: Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132151 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LILLIAN KREBS, MARK KREBS, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, FRED KREBS and KREBSVIEW FARMS, Justices Plaintiffs, 

v SC: 132151 

 COA: 258813 

Ingham CC: 03-000807-CK

WILLIAM and SALLY NYGREN,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SECURA INSURANCE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4988 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4988

 To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis 
   of sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis 
   of sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Non-Discrimination Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ACT AND RELATED PROVISIONS.

    (a) Housing Sale and Rental, Residential Real Estate-Related 
Transactions, and Brokerage Services.--
            (1) Section 804 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3604) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
            (2) Section 805 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3605) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
            (3) Section 806 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3606) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,''.
    (b) Prevention of Intimidation.--Section 901 of the Civil Rights 
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) is amended by inserting ``sexual 
orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
    (c) Definition.--Section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 
3602) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) `Sexual orientation' means homosexuality, heterosexuality, or 
bisexuality.
    ``(q) `Gender identity' means the gender-related identity, 
appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an 
individual, with or without regard to the individual's designated sex 
at birth.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLIC EDUCATION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development not to exceed $1,000,000 for fiscal year 
2011 for the purposes of educating the public regarding the protections 
provided by the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.29.3

                             [HOME INTERIORS LOGO]


TO:        Barbara Hammond

FROM:      Joey Carter

CC:        Pat Sinclair, Director of Human Resources

DATE:      12/13/00

Re:        Employment with Home Interiors and Gifts, Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Barbara, for purpose of our employment files, I wanted to update the previous
memo from Tina Simon dated July 14, 2000. This letter confirms our discussions
earlier this month concerning your continued participation as Vice Chairman of
the Board and your employment with Home Interiors as an Advisor to the Chief
Executive Officer. Effective, January 1, 2001, you will receive $5,000 monthly
less applicable taxes and deductions, plus reimbursement for normal and
customary expenses. Home Interiors will continue to provide for lease payments
for Unit 1434A of the Bonaventure Condos. You will remain eligible for all
medical benefits and 401k participation. We have also specifically agreed that
you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time, for any reason,
upon reasonable notice.


Thank you again and if this correctly states your understanding of the
Agreement, please sign two (2) copies and return one to me.


AGREED and ACCEPTED:                   APPROVED:


/s/ BARBARA HAMMOND                            /s/ JOEY CARTER
-----------------------------          -----------------------------------------
    Barbara Hammond                                Joey Carter




                                      MEMO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA

- 24

- 0506

THE PATCH, LLC d/b/a Purple Cow Dispensary,

Petitioner/Appellant

v.

THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , CANNABIS CONTROL

DIVISION

Respondent/Appelee

On A ppeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County

The Honorable Judge Thomas Pardy Presiding

District Court Cause No. DV

- 2023

- 735

,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon review of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time and

good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for

Extension of Time is granted. Appellant’s Opening Brief is due on or before

October 28, 2024.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 25 2024

09/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0506
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffrey R. Steinhilber, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2006 By:  /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber   Name:  Jeffrey R. Steinhilber  Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Director
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40038

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

J. GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ-DUQUE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-02-CR-450-1

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 J. Guadalupe Hernandez-Duque appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Hernandez-Duque contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Hernandez-Duque maintains that
No. 03-40038

-2-

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release

which may be imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Hernandez-Duque acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41107

Conference Calendar

WILLIAM NISWANGER

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ASHLEY POWELL, D.P.O II District Parole Officer; TEXAS BOARD OF

PARDONS AND PAROLES; GLENN GEYER

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CV-297

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Niswanger, Texas prisoner # 636282, filed a pro se, in forma

pauperis civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the above

named defendants. On August 22, 2007, the district court entered final

judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

Niswanger filed a notice of appeal and a motion to reopen time for filing an

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-41107

2

appeal pursuant to FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(6) on November 5, 2007. The district

court denied the motion to reopen. 

If necessary, this court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction sua

sponte. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of

appeal in a civil case is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Bowles v. Russell, 127

S. Ct. 2360, 2366 (2007). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A) requires

that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the

judgment or order from which the appeal is taken. Niswanger’s notice of appeal

from the district court’s August 22, 2007, dismissal of his § 1983 complaint was

due on September 21, 2007. 

On appeal, Niswanger does not address the untimely filing of his notice of

appeal or the district court’s denial of his motion to reopen under FED. R. APP.

P. 4(a)(6). Even if Niswanger had challenged the district court’s denial, he

cannot show error because he has not asserted, on appeal or in the district court,

that he did not receive notice of entry of final judgment more than 21 days after

August 22, 2007. The district court did not err in finding that Niswanger failed

to fulfill the requirements of Rule 4(a)(6)(A). Niswanger failed to file a timely

notice of appeal. This court lacks jurisdiction over any appeal from the judgment

of August 22, 2007. See Bowles, 127 S. Ct. at 2366. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  --------------------------------------------------------------------   In connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: August 22, 2011   /s/ Mark L. Kay Mark L. Kay Chief Executive Officer