alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353]


Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Partial Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has 
granted the request of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) to 
withdraw a portion of its July 22, 2004, application and the December 
3, 2004, and September 20, 2005, supplements for proposed amendments to 
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 for the Limerick 
Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in Montgomery County, 
Pennsylvania.
    The proposed amendments would have revised the Technical 
Specifications (TSs) pertaining to the operability requirements in TS 
3/4.1.3, ``Control Rods.'' Specifically, one of the proposed changes 
would have eliminated consideration of control rod drive water pressure 
in the action statement of TS 3.1.3.1.b.1.b. The Commission had 
previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment 
published in the Federal Register on May 24, 2005 (70 FR 29794). 
However, by letter dated September 20, 2005, the licensee withdrew the 
above-referenced proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated July 22, 2004, as supplemented by 
letters dated December 3, 2004, and September 20, 2005. Documents may 
be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room 
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area 01 F21, 11555 
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly-available 
records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents 
Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on 
the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems 
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR 
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by 
e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a0a1e083a140819541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcccd8cefcd2cedf92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of September 2005.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Travis L. Tate,
Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 05-19789 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001068052
<NAME> EPIC RESORTS LLC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      14,363,000
<SECURITIES>                                29,465,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,502,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,628,000
<INVENTORY>                                 65,804,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      21,087,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,422,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,551,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,818,000
<BONDS>                                    128,976,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,800,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,551,000
<SALES>                                     84,163,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           118,848,000
<CGS>                                       15,727,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,973,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,652,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,092,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,039,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,094,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,094,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,094,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Infosys Technologies Limited



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-32196) on Form S-8 of Infosys Technologies Limited of our report dated April
10, 2002, relating to the balance sheets of Infosys Technologies Limited as of
March 31, 2002, and 2001, and the related statements of income, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2002, and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2002, annual report on Form 20-F
of Infosys Technologies Limited.

                                                                        /s/ KMPG

                                                                            KMPG


Bangalore, India
May 4, 2002
#### KUEI SEN-TUNG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 90-2534.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Jan. 29, 1991.

John M. Facciola, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for the U.S.

Kuei Sen-Tung, Lewisburg, Pa., plaintiff pro se.

ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kuei Sen-Tung is a national of Taiwan, who was extradited from Brazil to stand trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and was convicted and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. He also stood trial on murder charges in a California state court and was convicted and sentenced to twenty-seven years to life imprisonment. California then returned the plaintiff to the federal prison authorities who are now incarcerating the plaintiff in the United States Penitentiary in Lewis-burg, Pennsylvania. California has lodged a detainer with -the federal prison authorities indicating that California intends to incarcerate the plaintiff subsequent to his federal sentence. The plaintiff claims that the California sentence was imposed in violation of a term of the extradition treaty between the United States and Brazil which limits his maximum potential sentence to thirty years imprisonment.

*19The defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff has opposed the motion.

The plaintiff alleges that the California court incorrectly interpreted the treaty and is seeking relief from the confinement that will be imposed upon him by the California court. Despite the plaintiffs contention that this case is properly before this Court under its federal question jurisdiction, the plaintiff is asserting that the California court that issued his detainer was in violation of the Treaty between the United States and Brazil. Therefore, he must proceed in *habeas corpus.*28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) (... a district court shall entertain an application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or *treaties*of the United States) (emphasis added); *Chatman-Bey v. Thornburgh,*864 F.2d 804, 808-809 (D.C.Cir.1988) (challenge to present or future confinement must be made by habeas corpus).

A court may not entertain a *habe-as corpus*action unless it has personal jurisdiction over the custodian of the prisoner. *Guerra v. Meese,*786 F.2d 414, 415 (D.C.Cir.1986). In this case, the official who issued the detainer in California is deemed the plaintiff’s custodian for purposes of attacking the detainer. This Court lacks personal jurisdiction over an official of the State of California, and therefore, the case must be dismissed. The plaintiff may file an appropriate *habeas corpus*action in the California State court where the detainer was issued.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the case is dismissed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q/A2 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q/A2 Report") that:

(1) the 10-Q/A2 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-Q/A2 Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.


Date:   January 21, 2009
                                                               By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                      --------------------------
                                                                       Jack Chen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date:   January 21, 2009
                                                                 By: /S/ Gary Li
                                                      --------------------------
                                                                         Gary Li
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Tisha HARDY, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

No. COA17-664

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel Eugene GEDDIE

No. 422P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, for Geddie, Samuel Eugene.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

*629Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of November 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th of November 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

On Friday, September 30, 2005 (70 FR 57256), the Department of Defense published a Notice of the Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Project Meetings. This notice is published to correct the date in Column 1 from “October 29, 2005” to “October 19, 2005”. All other information remain unchanged.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lt. Col. Rene Bergeron, Assistant Director of Staff, Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Project, 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Rm 3A873, Washington DC 20310-1010; Telephone: (703) 697-3420; Fax: (703) 697-3511;                         *rene.bergeron@pentagon.af.mil*

Dated: October 11, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-20694  Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Curtis Leon ABNEY

No. 233P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Abney, Curtis Leon

Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Peter Toscano, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Precious Metals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 21, 2005
/s/ Peter Toscano
Peter Toscano
Chief Executive Officer
#### C & G BOAT COMPANY, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-3264

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 22, 1972.

*1291George B. Matthews, H. Barton Williams, Samuel C. Gainsburgh, Maurice L. Burk, H. Alva Brumfield, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph W. Nelkin, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Thomas J. Wyllie, New Orleans, La., for Falco, Inc.

Robert B. Aeomb, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Citronelle.

P. A. Bienvenu, New Orleans, La., for Sun Oil.

Nigel E. Rafferty, New Orleans, La., for Hess Oil, etc.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5th Cir.; Bee Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

We conclude that the judgment of the district court in this matter is correct. See C & G Boat Co., Inc., et al. v. Crescent River Port Pilots Association, et al., E.D.La.1972.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4904 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4904

 To prohibit the use of funds for implementation or enforcement of any 
             Federal mandate to purchase health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2010

 Mr. Poe of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds for implementation or enforcement of any 
             Federal mandate to purchase health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT OR ENFORCE FEDERAL 
              MANDATE TO PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 
Federal department or agency may be used to implement or enforce any 
Federal mandate to purchase health insurance.
                                 <all>
```
J. 

J. 

delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials. See NRAP 4(d), On 

January 2, 2015, the attorney general timely filed a response. 

The documents provided by the attorney general indicate that 

appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official for filing on 

November 10, 2014, 14 days beyond the relevant appeal period. Because 

appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we lack jurisdiction to 

consider this appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

CitLe8L--- J 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

Steven J. Hann 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ce
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 14, 2011







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-38339) of RTI International Metals, Inc. of our
report dated June 20, 2003 relating to the financial statements of the RMI
Titanium Company Employee Savings and Investment Plan, which appears in this
Form 10-K/A. We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-38340) of RTI International Metals,
Inc. of our report dated June 20, 2003 relating to the financial statements of
the RMI Titanium Company Bargaining Unit Employee Savings and Investment Plan,
which appears in this Form 10-K/A. We also hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-391420) of RTI
International Metals, Inc. of our report dated June 30, 2003 relating to the
financial statements of the RTI International Metals, Inc. Employee Savings and
Investment Plan, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

June 30, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon W. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ JON W. CLARK Name:  Jon W. Clark
Title:Chief Financial Officer


August 10,
2009

---



QuickLinks