alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Kurt Allen COREY

189PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 14, 2018

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, Kurt Allen Corey, for Corey, Kurt Allen.

Sharon Patrick-Wilson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 14th of November 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of November 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 17th day of December 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### Exchange National Bank of Tampa, as Administrator of the Estate of Adrian C. Honore, Deceased, *Appellant,*v. Flynn-Harris-Bullard Company, et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 16, 1928.

*Kmght, Thompson <& Turner*and *James F. Glen,*for Appellant ;

*Hampton & Greene,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause is a companion case to that of Exchange National Bank of Tampa, as Administrator of the Estate of Adrian C. Honoré, deceased, Appellant, v. Clark-Ray-Johnson Company, *et al.,*Appellees, opinion in which case was filed at this term of Court.

The order of the chancellor here under consideration should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the above stated case, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J. and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
annual report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Choi, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    DAVID C.
CHOI   
|David C. Choi          
|Chief Financial Officer

March 18,
2010
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Presidential Documents 59983 

Proclamation 7944 of October 7, 2005 

Columbus Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Christopher Columbus’ journey across uncharted waters in 1492 changed 

the course of history. Overcoming many obstacles, the explorer from Genoa 

pursued a dream that carried him to the ‘‘New World’’ and helped launch 

an age of exploration, leading to the founding of new countries across 

the Americas. Through the years, the desire to discover and understand 

has been a part of our Nation’s character, and Columbus’ spirit has inspired 

generations of explorers and inventors. On Columbus Day, we honor Christopher Columbus and the vision that carried him on his historic voyage. 

Since 1934, when President Roosevelt first proclaimed the national holiday, 

our Nation has observed Columbus Day to mark the moment when the 

Old World met the New. As we recognize Columbus’ legacy, we also celebrate 

the contributions of Italian Americans to our Nation’s growth and wellbeing. Americans of Italian descent are musicians and athletes, doctors and 

lawyers, teachers and first responders. They are serving bravely in our 

Armed Forces. From our country’s first days, the sons and daughters of 

Italy have brought honor to themselves and enriched our national life. 

More than 500 years after Columbus’ journey, we are honored that the 

Italian Republic is among our closest friends and strongest allies. On Columbus Day, we celebrate this strong bond between America and Italy. 

In commemoration of Columbus’ journey, the Congress, by joint resolution 

of April 30, 1934, and modified in 1968 (36 U.S.C. 107), as amended, 

has requested that the President proclaim the second Monday of October 

of each year as ‘‘Columbus Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 10, 2005, as Columbus Day. I 

call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate 

ceremonies and activities. I also direct that the flag of the United States 

be displayed on all public buildings on the appointed day in honor of 

Christopher Columbus. 

59984 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–20658 

Filed 10–12–05; 9:19 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
The MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF the CITY OF GARDEN CITY v. HARRIS et al.

A16A0945.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

September 28, 2018

David Bobo Mullens III, Savannah, Patrick T. O'Connor, for Appellant.

Christopher Dorian Britt, Jeremy Springer McKenzie, Savannah, for Appellees.

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

In *The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Garden City v. Harris* , 302 Ga. 853, 809 S.E.2d 806 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court's decision in *The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Garden City v. Harris* , 339 Ga. App. 452, 793 S.E.2d 628 (2016). Accordingly, we vacate our prior opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court. The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

Mercier and Gobeil, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Floyd Calvin CODY, Defendant.

No. COA18-503

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 4, 2018

AFFIRMED.
#### FRED ALEXANDER THOMPSON v. JAMES ALEX BOLES and ALITA REE BOLES

No. 7421SC164

(Filed 6 March 1974)

Automobiles § 50— insufficiency of evidence of negligence

Plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to permit a jury to find that the collision between his motorcycle and defendants’ car occurred from any negligence on the part of defendants.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Armstrong, Judge,*15 October 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Forsyth County.

Action for damages arising from a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendants’ automobile. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court allowed defendants’ motion for a directed verdict and plaintiff appealed.

*Richard Tyndall and Walter W. Pitt, Jr. for plaintiff appellant.*

*W. F. Maready for defendant appellees.*

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff was the only witness to testify concerning the collision. From his testimony it is impossible to determine what occurred. Even resolving all discrepancies in his favor and giving him the benefit of all favorable inferences, his testimony was insufficient to permit a jury to find that the collision occurred from any negligence on the part of defendants.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
        capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 Date:
        October 24, 2005
 
 /s/
        Thomas C.
        Hemingway
 Thomas
        C.
        Hemingway, President and C.E.O.
 (Principal
        Executive Officer)
#### Sandy Yvette NORTON, a/k/a Tequila Smith, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-1727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 8, 2003.

*863VILLANTI, Judge.

Sandy Yvette Norton, a/k/a Tequila Smith, challenges the summary denial of her postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Norton alleges four grounds for relief, three of which we affirm without comment. Because the trial court did not refute ground one of her motion, we reverse.

Norton waived her right to a jury trial and was convicted by the court of robbery. In ground one of her motion, Norton alleged that her counsel advised her to “let the judge sentence you, because if you go with a jury, the jury will hang you.” Norton further alleged that she would not have waived her right to a jury trial had counsel not given her that advice. This is a facially sufficient claim for postconviction relief. See *Chacon v. State,*735 So.2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

In its order, the trial court failed to refute Norton’s claim. The trial court stated that “the Court, not the jury, was going to sentence the Defendant whether she decided to be tried by the jury or by the Court. When a postconviction motion is filed by a pro se prisoner, the trial court should not scrutinize it for technical niceties. *See Andrews v. State,*160 So.2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). Here, the trial court took Norton too literally and failed to address the actual claim she made. By focusing on her use of the word “sentence” instead of the underlying claim, the trial court failed to address Norton’s claim that she would not have waived her right to a jury trial had counsel not told her that the jury would “hang” her.

Because the trial court failed to refute Norton’s claims in ground one of her motion, we reverse and remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record that refute her claim or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and CANADY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPIL HOLDING(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nitin Amersey, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Nitin Amersey*     |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| November 19, 2012       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Collegiate Funding Services,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Kevin A. Landgraver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: August 20, 2004 By: /s/ Kevin A. Landgraver
Kevin A. Landgraver
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report
of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hollaway, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/S/    DAVID
HOLLAWAY                 
|David Hollaway Chief Financial Officer

March 1,
2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BREON POWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 280 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
WEINBERG & COMPANY, PA
                        Town Executive Center
                     6100 Glades Road, Suite 314
                      Boca Raton, Florida 33434


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB of Westford Acquisition
Corporation of our report for the period from June 2, 1998 (inception)
to December 31, 1998 dated February 16, 1999 relating to the financial
statements of Westford Acquisition Corporation which appear in such 
Form 10-KSB.


                              WEINBERG & COMPANY PA
                              Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida 
March 8, 1999
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                            |                                                            |                             |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                            | WILSHIRE              BANCORP,              INC.                |
|                       |                                                       |                        |
| Date:              May 12, 2008 | By:                                                   | /s/ Joanne              Kim |
|                            | Joanne                KimChief                Executive Officer |
|                            |                                                            |

|                            |                                                         |                          |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                       |                                                    |                     |
| Date:              May 12, 2008 | By:                                                | /s/ Alex              Ko |
|                            | Alex                KoChief                Financial Officer |
|                            |                                                         |

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated March 25, 2005, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on April 5 2005, (70 FR 17262), Rhodes Technologies, 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in Schedule I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIThebaine (9333)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for conversion and distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Rhodes Technologies to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Rhodes Technologies to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed. Dated: October 12, 2005. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control,  Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 05-20948 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Ted Sanders,certify that:

1.       I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of eCOST.com, Inc.; and

2.       Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.





|Date:  November 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Ted Sanders
        Ted  Sanders
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
STATE v. Timothy Ray CASEY

133A09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2019

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC

Lauren E. Miller, Attorney at Law, Atlanta, for Casey, Timothy Ray

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of February 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2019."
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To BANK ONE CORPORATION:

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated January 17, 2000, included in this Form 10-K, into the
Corporation's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-03470,
Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-14475, Form S-8 Registration Statement
No. 33-10822, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-18277, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-27849, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
33-34294, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-37400, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 33-20890, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-20990, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-40041, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
33-45473, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-46189, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 33-53752, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-55172, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-55174, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
33-54100, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-61760, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 33-61758, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-60424, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-50117, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
33-55149, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-55315, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 33-58923, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-00445, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-26929, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
333-27631, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-28281, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-29395, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-30419, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-30421, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
333-30425, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-30429, Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-56739, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-52503, Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-63837, Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
333-32053, Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-60313, Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-38387, Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-72791, Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-65427, Form S-3 Registration Statement No.
333-65451, Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-80903 and Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-93905.

                               /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois,
March 16, 2000