alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger M. Cozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Roger M. CozziName:
                Roger
      M. CozziTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:  November
      5, 2010
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin Pickard, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      December 24, 2008
            
            /s/
      Kevin
      PickardKevin
      Pickard
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 5, 2 019

No. 04

- 17

- 00338

- CV

Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft

, Appellant s

v.

Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela G allagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 10

- 00188

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants have filed a Fourth Response to Abatement, in which appellants assert the parties jointly request that we extend the abatement of this appeal for thirty days so that the parties may effectuate the terms of their settle ment agreement. The request is GRANTED

. It is
ORDERED that appellants file, on or before May 3, 2019, a response in this court addressing whether the abatement should be lifted and the appeal reinstated on the docket of this court.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1, 43.2; see Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 180 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2001, no pet.).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 5th day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert R. Foley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                |   | /s/ Robert R. Foley     |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:          |   | Robert R. Foley         |
| Title:         |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|           |
| August 9, 2007 |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.22
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
  By:
    
    /s/ Thomas P. LloydPrint Name:
    
    Thomas P. LloydJM/sr




---



##### 



th
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup NA (Alera 100)
    
    CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
  By: 
Print Name:
    
    /s/ Simon Rocall

Simon RocallJM/sr




---



##### 



Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    CTA Capital LLC
    
    Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.
    
    CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
  By:
    
    /s/ Natasha Reeve-WattsPrint Name:
    
    Natasha Reeve-WattsJM/sr
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), KarenMagee, the Chief Executive Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:     1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32.1 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company for the periods presentedtherein.     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 3rd day of August 2007.             /s/ KAREN MAGEE   Karen Magee   Chief Executive Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of this report. A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to PlanetOut Inc. and will be retained by PlanetOut Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

TERRY LEE FORTSON JR.

PETITION OF: ASHLEY E. SMITH, 

ESQUIRE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 24 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1

st day of June, 2023, upon consideration of the Application for 

Leave to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas 

of Juniata County to determine whether to grant Attorney Ashley E. Smith leave to 

withdraw. In the event the court permits Attorney Smith to withdraw, the court is to resolve 

any other related questions, including whether to appoint new counsel or to permit Terry 

Lee Fortson Jr. to proceed pro se. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Juniata County is DIRECTED to enter its order on 

remand within 90 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination. 

Attorney Smith is reminded that counsel’s duty of representation continues through 

allocatur review and precludes counsel from withdrawing absent leave of court. See

Pa.R.Crim.P. 120 and 122.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4775 

To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 

5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 

552b of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred 

to as the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy 

Act), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 

App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open and Transparent 

5 Smithsonian Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4775 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF OPEN GOVERNMENT STATUTES 

2 TO THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The following provisions shall 

4 apply to the Smithsonian Institution: 

5 (1) Section 552 of title 5, United States Code 

6 (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Informa7 tion Act). 

8 (2) Sections 552a of title 5, United States Code 

9 (commonly referred to as the Privacy Act). 

10 (3) Sections 552b of title 5, United States Code 

11 (relating to open meetings). 

12 (4) The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 

13 U.S.C. App.). 

14 (b) AGENCY.—For purposes of each provision of law 

15 under subsection (b)— 

16 (1) the Smithsonian Institution shall be an 

17 agency; and 

18 (2) the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 

19 shall be the head of the agency. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.— 

21 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take 

22 effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 

23 (2) APPLICATION.—This section shall apply 

24 to— 

25 (A) all actions taken by the Board of Re26 gents of the Smithsonian Institution or any ofVerDate Nov 24 2008 05:23 Mar 05, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4775.IH H4775

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4775 IH

1 ficer or employee of the Smithsonian Institution 

2 before, on, or after the date of enactment of 

3 this Act; 

4 (B) any record created before, on, or after 

5 that date; and 

6 (C) any meeting held before, on, or after 

7 that date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN B. BOYETTE

No. 747SC861

(Filed 5 February 1975)

Criminal Law § 177— death of defendant pending appeal

Where defendant died while his appeal from a criminal conviction was pending, the action is abated and the appeal is dismissed.

On *certiorari*to review trial before *Martin, (Robert M.), Judge,*10 December 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Wilson County.

Defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and judgment imposing a prison sentence was entered. The appeal was argued before this Court on 10 December 1974.

*Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten by Assistant Attorney General Roy A. Giles, Jr., for the State.*

*Connor, Lee, Connor, Reeee & Bunn by Cyrus F. Lee; Lucas, Rand, Rose, Meyer, Jones & Orcutt by David S. Orcutt, attorneys for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

It appearing that defendant died on 8 January 1975, the action stands abated and the appeal is dismissed.

Action abated.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11507

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEFFREY DAVID SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-256-1

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey David Smith appeals the district court’s revocation of his 

supervised release, arguing that the evidence failed to establish that he 

violated the conditions of his supervised release by committing a new offense 

under 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2). He contends that there was insufficient evidence 

that his statement on his monthly reporting form, in which he falsely denied 

having contact with persons with a criminal record, was material or was made 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11507 Document: 00514144239 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2017
No. 16-11507

2

with an intent to deceive, both of which are necessary elements under the 

statute. A district court may revoke a term of supervised release upon a 

finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant violated a 

condition of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. 

Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 118-19 (5th Cir. 2005). The district court’s decision to 

revoke supervised release is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States 

v. Grandlund, 71 F.3d 507, 509 (5th Cir. 1995), opinion clarified, 77 F.3d 811 

(5th Cir. 1996). When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, 

this court must “view the evidence and all reasonable inferences that may be 

drawn from the evidence in a light most favorable to the government.” United 

States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 38 F.3d 788, 792 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal quotation 

marks and citation omitted). The district court can “choose among reasonable 

constructions of the evidence,” and the evidence is sufficient if a reasonable 

trier of fact could have reached the district court’s conclusion. Id. (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we 

conclude that a reasonable trier of fact could determine that Smith violated the 

conditions of his supervised release by making a false statement on his 

supervised release monthly reporting form in violation of § 1001. See 

Grandlund, 71 F.3d at 509; Alaniz-Alaniz, 38 F.3d at 792. Therefore, the 

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-11507 Document: 00514144239 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2017
***CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Luo                  Ken Yi                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
| Name: Luo                  Ken YiTitle:                   Chief                  Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officerand                  Chairman of the Board  |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
| /s/ Wang                  Xin                                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Name: Wang                  XinTitle:                   Chief                  Financial Officer November                  20, 2006                                    |   |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20796]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:30-6 p.m.

Place: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or Carol Booker 
at (202) 203-4545.

    Dated: October 11, 2005.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-20796 Filed 10-13-05; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Notice

Time and Date:  9 a.m. (EDT), October 17, 2005.

Place:  4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW, Washington, DC.

Status:  Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to Be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the September 19, 2005, Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    3. Quarterly Investment Policy report.
    4. Quarterly Vendor Financial Statement report.
    5. Old business. Resolution to require Executive Director to 
consult Board.
    6. Mid-year financial audit report from Deloitte & Touche.

Parts Closed to the Public

    7. Procurement.
    8. Personnel.

Contact person for more information:  Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Elizabeth S. Woodruff,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 05-20482 Filed 10-6-05; 5:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoSensors, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted Wong, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By: /s/
      Ted
      Wong


Ted
      Wong,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


October
      19, 2006
#### M.L. GODLEY, M.D., et al. v. DARNALL, SIKES, KOLDER, FREDERICK & RAINEY, a Corporation of Certified Public Accounts, et al.

No. 02-989.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 6, 2003.

George Allen Walsh, Alice F. Estill, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants Appellants Vikki Lynn Baiers, W. Gregory Baker.

Nancy Scott Degan, Roy Clifton Cheat-wood, Kent Andrew Lambert, New Orleans, LA, Reginald J. Ringuet, Lafayette, LA, for Secondary Defendants Appellants LAF Foods, Inc., BCM L.L.C., NKF IDR Limited Partnership, CPCI Incorporated, VLB, Inc., Louis B. Viviano, CBC International, Inc., Greg Baker Enterprises, Nawlins Kajun Food L.L.C.

*1277Robert A. Kutcher, Patricia Diane Tun-mer, Nicole Sophia Tygier, Metairie, LA John Bologna Krentel, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants Appellees William A. Copeland III, Copeland’s of New Orleans, Inc., Alvin C. Copeland, Jr.

Larry Lane Roy, Jennifer A. Wells, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants Appellees Co-regis Ins. Co., Chris Verret.

William H. Parker, III, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants Appellees Ed Larry Sikes, Darnell, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rai-ney.

Steven Gerald Durio, Jessica Watts Farmer, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants Appellees Donald J. Baker, Kirby Pecot, Andrew B. Jameson, Max Luttgeharm, M.L. Godley, M.D.

Robert Louis Broussard, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant Appellee Donald J. Baker.

Joseph C. Giglio, Jr., Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff Appellee Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D.

Court composed of NED E. DOUCET, JR., Chief Judge, GLENN B. GREMILLION, and ELIZABETH A. PICKETT, Judges.

DOUCET, Chief Judge.

For the reasons set forth in *Glod v. Baker,*02-988 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/6/03), 851 So.2d 1255, 2003 WL 21804398, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal shall be paid two-thirds by Baker and Baiers, and one-third by Vivi-ano and his entities not to include the two LLCs.

AFFIRMED.