alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Grace Keator et al. against Rock Plaster Manufacturing Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Commission, Appellant.

Workmen’s compensation — state industrial commission without jurisdiction to make award for death of workmen injured while engaged on maritime contract.

A workman in charge of the unloading of rock from a vessel in navigable waters is engaged in the performance of a maritime contract and the state industrial commission has no jurisdiction to make an award for his death occasioned by his being struck by a load of the rock which was being hoisted from the vessel to the dock. *Matter of Doey*v. *Howland Co.. Inc.,*224 N. Y. 30, followed.

*Keator*v. *Rock Plaster Manfg. Co.,*182 App. Div. 153, affirmed.

(Argued April 25, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Appeal from an .order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 8, 1918, reversing an award of the state industrial commission and dismissing the claim.

*Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken*of counsel), for appellant.

*Bertrand L, Pettigrew*and *W. L. Glenney*for respondents.

*541McLaughlin, J.

On the 12th of June, 1917, Alexander Keator was in the employ of the Rock Plaster Manufacturing Company, which had a place of business at One Hundred and Fiftieth street and East river, New York city. As a necessary incident to the carrying on of such business, rock was unloaded from vessels lying alongside a pier in the East river, and dumped on the dock near the plant. Keator had charge of the unloading of such rock. On the day mentioned, while actually engaged in the performance of his duties in unloading a vessel, then in navigable waters, he was struck by a load of rock being hoisted from the vessel to the dock and killed.

I am of the opinion, for the reasons stated by me in *Matter of Doey*v. *Howland Co., Inc.,*decided herewith, that Keator, at the time he was killed, was engaged in the performance of a maritime contract.

The order appealed from, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs against the state industrial commission.

His cock, Ch. J., Chase and Collin, JJ., concur; Cuddeback, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ., dissent.

Order affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

[To be published]. 

# Status:

Closed meeting. 

# Place:

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC. 

# Announcement of Additional Meeting:

Additional meeting. 

An additional Closed Meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, October 12, 2005 at 9 a.m. 

Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the matter will attend the closed meeting. 

                        The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5                               ( print page 59100)                            U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the closed meeting.                     

Commissioner Nazareth, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be: Institution and settlement of an injunctive action. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: October 5, 2005. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-20389 Filed 10-6-05; 11:37 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
##### 



EXECUTED as of March 14, 2007./s/ Edward F. Crawford
    
    /s/ Richard P. ElliottEdward F. Crawford
    
    Richard P. Elliott, Vice President and ChiefChief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
    
    Financial Officerand Director/s/ Matthew V. Crawford
    
    /s/ Dan T. MooreMatthew V. Crawford
    
    Dan T. Moore, DirectorPresident, Chief Operating Officer, and Director/s/ Patrick V. Auletta
    
    /s/ Ronna RomneyPatrick V. Auletta, Director
    
    Ronna Romney, Director/s/ Kevin R. Greene
    
    /s/ James W. WertKevin R. Greene, Director
    
    James W. Wert, Director
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00590-CV

Christus Spohn Health System Corporation d/b/a Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus 

Christi-Shoreline

v.

Elda Alaniz

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2017CCV-60129-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

interlocutory appeal, concludes the order of the trial court should be reversed and the 

cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the order of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee, Elda Alaniz.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 2, 2018
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

HERBERT and LESLIE GRAHAM, ) 

 ) 

 Appellants, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-4357 

 ) 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor ) 

by Merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A., ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed April 12, 2017. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands 

County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge. 

Kevin L. Hagen of Hagen & Hagen P.A., Ft. 

Lauderdale, for Appellants. 

Monica L. Haddad Forbes, Sara F. HolladayTobias, and Emily Y. Rottmann, of 

McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, for 

Appellee. 

CASANUEVA, Judge. 

 Herbert and Leslie Graham appeal a final judgment of foreclosure in favor 

of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. We find merit 

only in their argument that the trial court erred in awarding $7790 in attorney's fees to 
- 2 -

Wells Fargo without making required findings.1 The remaining portions of the final 

judgment are affirmed without comment. 

 The final judgment of foreclosure awarding Wells Fargo attorney's fees 

fails to set forth findings as to the time reasonably expended, the hourly rate, or other 

factors, if any, considered to explain how the trial court arrived at the amount of fees it 

awarded as required by Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 

(Fla. 1985). Because these findings are required, the lack of a transcript does not affect 

this court's review of the order on appeal. See Guardianship of Halpert v. Rosenbloom, 

698 So. 2d 938, 939-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (noting that Rowe findings are mandatory 

and where an order lacks such findings, the lack of a transcript does not preclude 

appellate review because reversible error is apparent on the face of the order); see also 

Bayer v. Glob. Renaissance Arts, Inc., 869 So. 2d 1232, 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) 

(same). 

 Accordingly, the award of $7790 for attorney's fees to Wells Fargo is 

reversed for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

 Affirmed in part; reversed in part. 

SLEET and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. 

 

 1The Grahams' brief does not challenge a $2800 fee award to Choice 

Legal Group.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4895 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4895

To amend section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, to include that 
     it is a policy of the Postal Service to ensure reasonable and 
  sustainable workloads and schedules for supervisory and management 
   employees and to clarify provisions relating to consultation and 
             changes or terminations in certain proposals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2010

   Mr. Connolly of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, to include that 
     it is a policy of the Postal Service to ensure reasonable and 
  sustainable workloads and schedules for supervisory and management 
   employees and to clarify provisions relating to consultation and 
             changes or terminations in certain proposals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honesty in Postal Manager Contracts 
Act''.

SEC. 2. POSTAL SERVICE SUPERVISORY AND OTHER MANAGERIAL ORGANIZATIONS.

    Section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``to ensure reasonable 
        and sustainable workloads and schedules for supervisory and 
        management employees;'' after ``other managerial personnel;'';
            (2) in subsection (b), in the second sentence, by inserting 
        ``as provided under subsection (d) and any changes in, or 
        termination of, pay policies and schedules and fringe benefit 
        programs for members of the supervisors' organization as 
        provided under subsection (e)'' before the period; and
            (3) in subsection (e)(1), by inserting ``, or termination 
        of,'' after ``any changes in''.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Pacific Northern Environmental Corporation )

) ASBCA Nos. 61666

- ADR, 61667

- ADR

61668

- ADR, 61669

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. N69450

- 12

- C

- 1257 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Johnathan M. Bailey, Esq.

Bailey & Bailey, P.C.

San Antonio, TX

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Susannah M. Mitchell, Esq.

Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WOODROW

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter

judgment in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of

$320,000.00. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest.

Dated: December 9 , 2020

Kenneth D. Woodrow

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)2 I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

J. REID PROUTY

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61666

- ADR, 61667

- ADR,

61668

- ADR, 61669

- ADR

, App eals of Pacific Northern Environmental Corporation

, rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s Charter.

Dated: December 9, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Luis Andre Carpintero Blanco, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TELE CENTRO OESTE
CELULAR PARTICIPACOES S.A.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

      a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
            us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
            in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
            covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
            reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5.    The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and to the audit committee of the company's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004

By: /s/ Luis Andre Carpintero Blanco
    ----------------------------------------
    Luis Andre Carpintero Blanco
    Executive Officer of Finance
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.10
 RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
1995 Stock Plan
As amended January 26, 2007
 (NOTE: Pursuant to Section 4.2 of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 20,
1998,by and among RMI Titanium Company (RMI), RTI International Metals, Inc.(RTI) and RMI
Acquisition Company, effective September 30, 1998 this Plan was assumed by RTI., which, as of such
date became the parent of RMI. All references to RMI from and after such date became references to
RTI.)
 Objectives
    Definitions
        Eligibility
 Administration




---



##### 



Shares Subject to the Plan
 Delegation of Authority
 Options
 Stock Appreciation Rights
 Restricted Stock
 Transfer
 Adjustments
 Tax Withholding
 Amendments




---



##### 



Effective and Termination Dates
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00757-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S., A.G., and M.M., Minor Children

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-539-B

Honorable Charles Sherrill, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2010

Ottis Sutton appeals the trial court’s order finding that his appeal of the order terminating 

his parental rights to his daughter, D.S., would be frivolous.1

 1 Mina Flanagan also appeals from the same termination proceeding; however, she does not dispute the frivolous 

finding and raises only one issue related to the assessment of attorney’s fees. Flanagan’s complaint will be 

addressed along with Sutton’s once the full reporter’s record has been filed. 

 See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 263.405(g) (Vernon 2008). Following a jury trial, the trial court terminated the parent-child 

relationship between Sutton and D.S. Sutton timely filed a motion for new trial and statement of 

appellate points containing twenty-seven issues for appeal, along with an affidavit of indigence. 

See id. § 263.405(b), (e) (Vernon 2008). Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court 

denied the motion for new trial, sustained Sutton’s affidavit of indigence, and ruled that the 

appeal was frivolous. See id. § 263.405(d) (Vernon 2008). Because the trial court found the 
04-09-00757-CV

- 2 -

appeal frivolous, Sutton was not entitled to a free copy of the record from the termination trial. 

After reviewing the record currently before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court 

abused its discretion in finding the appeal frivolous. Accordingly, a review of the reporter’s 

record from the underlying termination proceeding is necessary to determine whether the trial 

court abused its discretion. In re T.C., 299 S.W.3d 828, 828 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, no 

pet.). 

Accordingly, it is ordered that the court reporter shall, on or before thirty (30) days from 

the date of this opinion and order, and without cost to Sutton, prepare and file the reporter’s 

record containing all of the evidence admitted at the termination trial. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(d). 

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3937 

To evaluate and report on the feasibility and effectiveness of using natural 

gas as a fuel source in long haul trucks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself and Mr. TERRY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To evaluate and report on the feasibility and effectiveness 

of using natural gas as a fuel source in long haul trucks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

4 It is the policy of Congress that our fuel supply needs 

5 to be diverse and one method of diversification is the use 

6 of natural gas as a fuel source in long haul trucks. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3937 IH

1 SEC. 2. EVALUATION AND REPORT. 

2 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall— 

4 (1) appoint representatives from the Depart5 ment of Energy, the Environmental Protection 

6 Agency, the Department of Commerce, Members of 

7 Congress, State governments, and private sector in8 dividuals to evaluate the issues described in para9 graph (2); and 

10 (2) conduct an evaluation and report to Con11 gress on its findings regarding the following: 

12 (A) Barriers to transition from diesel fuel 

13 to natural gas in long haul trucks. 

14 (B) Environmental benefits of using nat15 ural gas in long haul trucks. 

16 (C) The benefits and drawbacks of using 

17 natural gas in long haul trucks. 

18 (D) The expected price differential between 

19 traditional diesel oems and natural gas oems. 

20 (E) Concerns of the participating rep21 resentatives appointed by the Secretary of using 

22 natural gas in long haul trucks. 

23 (F) The effect of using natural gas in long 

24 haul trucks on the Highway Trust Fund. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 3937 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITION. 

2 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘long haul truck’’ 

3 means a commercial vehicle with a 26,000 pound or great4 er gross vehicle weight rating. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 5, 2012

s1128

Order 

December 5, 2012

144186

ALEX A. LEMERAND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144186

COA: 298637

Court of Claims: 09-000067-MZ

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________________________

By order of April 23, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 

2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

McCahan v Brennan (Docket No. 142765). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on August 20, 2012, 492 Mich 730 (2012), the application is again considered, 

and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.