alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00511-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF NED THEODORE GORDON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-CPR-022104

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On May 21, 2012, appellant, Marshall Gordon, filed a notice of appeal from 

a portion of a judgment signed August 8, 2011, which was purportedly made final 

and appealable by a final summary judgment signed April 20, 2012. No record has 

been filed.

On June 19, 2012, appellant filed an opposed motion to abate this appeal 

pending resolution of his motion to dismiss a related appeal docketed under our 

case number 14-11-00812-CV, and styled Patricia Vickery v. Marshall Gordon & 

Clardy, Davis & Knowles. On July 11, 2012, we granted appellant’s motion to 
2

abate this appeal.

The motion to dismiss in case number 14-11-00812-CV was denied in this 

court’s opinion issued July 31, 2012. See Vickery v. Gordon, No. 14-11-00812-CV, 

2012 WL 3089409 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 31, 2012, no pet.) 

(mem. op.). Mandate has issued and the appeal in case number 14-11-00812-CV is 

final. Accordingly, on January 15, 2013, we ordered this appeal reinstated. We also 

ordered appellant to make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record and arrange 

for the record to be filed in this appeal on or before February 15, 2013. In our 

order, we notified appellant that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

Appellant did not respond to this court’s January 15, 2013, order. The 

clerk’s record has not been filed, and no request for an extension of time to file the 

record has been received. 

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4919 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. MACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways 

and Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, 

House Administration, Appropriations, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA. 

4 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec5 tion and Affordable Care Act, such Act is repealed, and 

6 the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act 

7 are restored or revived as if such Act had not been en8 acted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20858                   20858
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         50000                   50000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (70858)                 (70858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Shirley ROULHAC, DefendantAppellant.

No. 71-3118

Summary Calendar.**

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 4, 1972.

Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

**

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

This appellant was convicted on four counts charging the forgery of United States Treasury checks in violation o.f 18 U.S.C. § 495, and the possession of stolen mail matter, 18 U.S.C. § 1708. She was sentenced to imprisonment for one year, to be confined six months and then placed on probation for three years.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 199 / Monday, October 17, 2005 / Presidential Documents 60399 

Presidential Determination No. 2005–39 of September 28, 2005 

Transfers of Defense Articles or Services for Libya for 

Chemical Weapons Destruction 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of 

the United States, including sections 40(g) and 40A of the Arms Export 

Control Act (AECA), I hereby: 

• determine that the transaction, encompassing sales or licensing for 

export of defense articles or defense services necessary to assist in 

chemical weapon (CW) destruction in Libya, is essential to the national security interests of the United States and important to the 

national interests of the United States; 

• waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related 

to such transaction; and 

• assign to you the functions under AECA section 40(g)(2) to consult 

with and submit reports to the Congress for proposed specific exports or transfers, 15 days prior to permitting them to proceed, that 

are necessary for and within the scope of this waiver determination 

and the transaction referred to herein. 

You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress 

and to arrange for its publication in the 

W 

Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 28, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–20854 

Filed 10–14–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Marc Holliday, Chief Executive Officer of Gramercy, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Gramercy.

 

 
| /s/ Marc  Holliday |                    |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:              | Marc Holliday           |   |
| Title:             | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               |                    |
| May 11, 2005  |                    |
|                    |                         |        |  |

 

----
# 1737-/3 ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-12-00590-CR OFFENSE: Driving While Intoxicated STYLE: Max David Voltmann v The State ofTexas COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed as Modified TRIAL COURT: Criminal Districr Court 4 DATE: 09/05/2013 Publish: No TC CASE #: 1223256D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
STYLE: Max David Voltmann v The State ofTexas CCA# 

# 1737-/3 S?a/"e.ls Petition CCA Disposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

# 'Keff^Utt?}) JUDGE: 

# DATE: °2-k' /y^ SIGNED: PC: JUDGE: {tA (JaAcJ^ PUBLISH: DNP: 57~sf /£ MOTION FOR 

# FORREHEARINGINCCAIS: \b£///£t) <fr 3^/^/^ 

# JUDGE: (j-l/^U^L ELECTRONIC RECORD

### OFFICIALNOTICE FROMCOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS OFTEXAS F,LE COPY P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### At.if/ •%•/ \jf \ 

## 3/26/2015 p| \/\%4> sE| COA No. 14-12-00590-CR VOLTMANN, MAX DAVIS WCt/^0223256D PD-1737-13 Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.Pr^theWeeoreBisTeturned to the court of appeals. 

# ********- Abel Acosta, Clerk 14TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE 301 FANNIN, SUITE 245 HOUSTON, TX 77002-7006 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00304

- CR

NESSKEN MARTINEZ ALV AREZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2185902

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Both a ppellant Nessken Martinez Alvarez and his attorney have signed and filed a written request to withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court2 to i ssue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation Board of 
Visitors; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the Board of Visitors (BoV) for the Western Hemisphere 
Institue for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC). Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). 
This board was chartered on February 1, 2004 in compliance with the 
requirements set forth in Title 10 U.S.C. 2166.
    Dates: December 1-2, 2005.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (December 1) and 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. 
(December 2).
    Location: Building 35, 7011 Morrison Ave., Fort Benning, GA 31905.
    Proposed Agenda: The WHINSEC BoV will receive new members and 
advisors, receive updates on the status of actions taken on past BoV 
recommendations and an update on new activities and efforts since 
December 2004; look into any matters it deems important; while meeting 
with groups of WHINSEC faculty and students

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chip Shelverton, WHINSEC Executive 
Liaison at (703) 693-2058 or LTC Alfred Brooks, Deputy DFO and Chief, 
Latin American Branch, Army G-3 at (703) 614-8414.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Please 
note that the Board members will arrive at various times on November 30 
and may use available time for individual member reviews of special 
interest items and will convene in plenary session on December 1, 2005. 
On December 1, the Board will adjourn for lunch between 12 p.m. and 
1:30 p.m. Public comment by individuals and organizations may be made 
from 11 a.m. and 12 p.m. on December 2. Public comment and 
presentations will be limited to two minutes each and members of the 
public desiring to make oral statements or presentations must inform 
the contact personnel, in writing. Requests must be received before 
Wednesday, November 23, 2005. Mail written presentations and requests 
to register to attend the public sessions to: Mr. Shelverton at HQDA, 
Army G-3, DAMO-SSR, 400 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310. Public 
seating is limited, and is available on a first come, first serve 
basis.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21069 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
The HONORABLE HENRY L. JONES, JR., United States Magistrate 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was

referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

___________

No. 95-1337

___________

Everett Chester Conley, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

 *

David Hunter, Sheriff, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Independence County, Arkansas; *

Ethan Moody; Johnny Gilpatrick; *

Leo Edwards, *

 *

Appellees, *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 1996

 Filed: March 12, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Everett Chester Conley

claimed that, while he was housed at the Detention Center in Independence

County, Arkansas, the sheriff and three jailers failed to protect him from

assaults by other detainees and denied him medical care after an assault.

Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that defendants did 1

not disregard any known risk to Conley's safety, and were not deliberately

indifferent to his serious medical needs. The court thus entered
-2-

judgment dismissing the action. Conley appeals, arguing that the district

court erred in crediting defendants' testimony over his.

After reviewing the district court's findings of fact for clear

error, and reviewing de novo whether defendants' conduct violated the

Eighth Amendment, see Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373 (8th Cir.

1993), we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Conley's

action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Excellency Investment Realty
Trust, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, David Mladen, Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and accounting officer) of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ David Mladen
   ----------------
       David Mladen
       Chief Executive Officer (principal
       executive and accounting officer)
       Dated this 20th day of November, 2006
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 13A-14 OF THE  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ETS Payphones, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
November 10, 2004

| |  | /s/GUY A. LONGOBARDOGuy A. Longobardo
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00316-CR

IN RE ERIC G. ANDIKA

Original Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Eric G. Andika filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to award 

him “Jail Time Credit” for time he spent in jail in the State of Georgia before being 

extradited back to the State of Texas. The petition states that Andika was arrested in 

Decatur, Georgia on May 2, 2003. The following day, he was arraigned “on a charge of 

being an escapee/fugitive from justice from Navarro County, Texas and a detainer was 

subsequently placed on [him] without bail.” Andika further states in the petition that 

on May 4, 2004, he was “transferred back to the custody of the Sheriff of Navarro 

County, Texas to stand trial on the charge of escape.”

Andika alleges that he filed a judgment nunc pro tunc seeking jail time credit for 

the time served in Georgia and that the trial court denied the motion. The trial court is 
In re Andika Page 2

required to grant the Applicant pre-sentence jail time credit when sentence is 

pronounced. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42.03 § 2(a) (West Pamph. 2010); Ex parte 

Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In the event the court fails to award 

such credit at the time the sentence is imposed, the trial court has the authority to 

correct the judgment to reflect the appropriate time credit by nunc pro tunc order and 

should do so. TEX. R. APP. P. Rule 23.2.; Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d at 148.

Neither the judgment nunc pro tunc nor the order denying the motion are 

included in Andika’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52 (k). It is not 

clear whether Andika was convicted and sentenced on a charge of escape for which he 

is seeking pre-sentence jail time credit or whether he was serving time for another 

conviction, escaped from custody, and is seeking credit for that sentence. Therefore, we 

cannot find that the trial court failed to award pre-sentence jail time credit at the time 

sentence was imposed.

Andika’s petition contains procedural defects. The petition does not identify the 

parties or contain proper proof of service. To expedite this matter, we implement TEX.

R. APP. P. 2 and suspend compliance with the pertinent procedural rules for this 

petition for mandamus.

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice
In re Andika Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2011

[OT06]
JULIAN RAY FOX, III

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1477

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant; Julian Ray Fox, III, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
JAN 26 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk 

## rr-s?ack7oM,'«VTmr
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6377

CHIVALRY MOORE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ORLANDO F. HUDSON, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court Judge; MATTHEW COOK, Attorney at Law; CHRIS J. VERMILLION, Detective; DAWN Y. BAXTON, Chief Public Defender

- 14th District , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , Chief District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00688

- CCE

- JEP )

Submitted : December 19 , 2023 Decided: December 27, 2023

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM , and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Chivalry Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6377 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : Chivalry Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Moore’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief . We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly , we affirm the district court’s order.
Moore v. Hudson , No. 1:22

- cv - 00688

- CCE

- JEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2023). We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6377 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2