alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 19, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Suncor Energy Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PERF intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 29, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 18, 2005 (70 FR 41237).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-20674 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 478 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to require annual reviews 

by Inspectors General of the operations, efficiency, and effectiveness 

of Federal programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2009 

Mr. JORDAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to require 

annual reviews by Inspectors General of the operations, 

efficiency, and effectiveness of Federal programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Agency Per5 formance Review and Efficiency Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 478 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL INSPECTOR GENERAL PERFORMANCE RE2 VIEWS OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND AGEN3 CIES. 

4 (a) PRINCIPAL DUTY.—Section 4 of the Inspector 

5 General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (a), (b), (c), 

7 and (d) as subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), respec8 tively; 

9 (2) by inserting before subsection (b) (as so re10 designated) the following new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(a) It shall be the principal duty and responsibility 

12 of each Inspector General, with respect to the establish13 ment within which his Office is established, to review an14 nually the operations, efficiency, and effectiveness of all 

15 Federal programs within such establishment and submit 

16 to the Congress and the President not later than Sep17 tember 1 of each year recommendations, accompanied by 

18 proposed legislation, on whether an abolishment, reorga19 nization, consolidation, or transfer of existing Federal pro20 grams and agencies is necessary— 

21 ‘‘(1) to reduce Federal expenditures; 

22 ‘‘(2) to increase efficiency of government oper23 ations; 

24 ‘‘(3) to eliminate overlap and duplication in 

25 Federal programs and offices; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 478 IH

1 ‘‘(4) to abolish agencies or programs that no 

2 longer serve an important governmental purpose; 

3 and 

4 ‘‘(5) to identify reductions in amounts of discre5 tionary budget authority or direct spending that can 

6 be dedicated to Federal deficit reduction.’’; and 

7 (3) in subsection (c)(1) (as so redesignated), by 

8 striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(1)’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Inspector 

10 General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is further amend11 ed— 

12 (1) in section 8(d), by striking ‘‘section 4(d)’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘section 4(e)’’; and 

14 (2) in section 8D(k)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘section 

15 4(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 4(e)’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Carbon Graphite Group. Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenfang Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August 14, 2012




/s/ Zhenfang Yang
Zhenfang Yang


Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert E. CHAVEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Appellee.

No. 71-1432.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 10, 1972.

Wycliffe V. Butler, of Butler & Col-berg, Albuquerque, N. M., for appellant.

Joseph F. Baca, Special Asst. Atty. Gen. (David Norvell, Atty. Gen., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, SETH and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery in the New Mexico courts and took an appeal. Before trial the appellant wanted to take a polygraph test, and upon stipulation that the results would be admissible, a test was conducted. The results were adverse and were admitted at his trial without objection. Appellant now maintains that the evidence was nevertheless inadmissible and that his rights under Miranda were not knowingly waived in view of the fact that the stipulation was made before the appellant was aware of the results of the test.

The rule in New Mexico is clear: the results of a polygraph test are not admissible over objection. State v. Trimble, 68 N.M. 406, 362 P.2d 788 (1961). However, no objection was here made. See this appellant’s appeal, State v. Chavez, 80 N.M. 786, 461 P.2d 919 (1969).

Appellant urges, however, that he has been denied his constitutional right against self-incrimination because the test results were admitted without the appellant having been informed of his rights under Miranda. We however do not decide whether any warning was *1073required in regard to the polygraph test, but in any event considering the sequence of events, waiver did not become pertinent until the appellant failed to object to admissibility upon the introduction of the evidence. Then a failure to make a proper and timely objection to this evidence now claimed to be objectionable would under these facts constitute a waiver. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694; Moreland v. United States, 270 F.2d 887 (10th Cir.). Appellant cannot be heard to complain now.

Affirmed.
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at December 31, 2005, and the results of the Companys operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 March 15, 2006
    /S/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. Dussek
Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of**


**1934,
      as amended**


**(Section 1350,
      Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**





Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Section 1350, Chapter 63
      of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.—§1350), each of James Chu,
      Chief Executive Officer of ViewSonic Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
      "Company"), and James A. Morlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does
      hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005
      (the "Form 10-K") to which this certification is attached as
      Exhibit 32.1 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. The information contained in the
      Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 3rd day of
      April 2006.






/s/
                JAMES CHUJames
                ChuChairman
                of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer/s/
                JAMES A. MORLANJames
                A. MorlanChief
                Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K
      or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
      such filing.
STATE v. Anthony Lee MCNAIR

230P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, Anthony Lee McNair, for McNair, Anthony Lee.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of November 2018 by Defendant for Respond and Reply for Remedy and Relief to the State's:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 20, 2005, 5 p.m. to 
October 21, 2005, 2:30 p.m., Hilton Crystal City, 2399 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the Federal 
Register on September 28, 2005, 70 FR 56727-56729.
    The meeting is cancelled due to the reassignment of the 
applications.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20736 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4887 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that health coverage 

provided by the Department of Defense is treated as minimal essential 

coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2010 

Mr. SKELTON (for himself, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. BORDALLO, Ms. 

SHEA-PORTER, Mr. NYE, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Ms. PINGREE of 

Maine, Mr. LOEBSACK, Ms. GIFFORDS, Mr. REYES, Mr. BOREN, Mr. 

KISSELL, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. TAYLOR, and Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that health coverage provided by the Department of Defense is treated as minimal essential coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

4 HEALTH COVERAGE AS MINIMAL ESSENTIAL 

5 COVERAGE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(f)(1) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4887 IH

1 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is 

2 amended— 

3 (1) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the fol4 lowing new clause: 

5 ‘‘(iv) medical coverage under chapter 

6 55 of title 10, United States Code, includ7 ing coverage under the TRICARE pro8 gram;’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v); 

10 (3) by striking the period at the end of clause 

11 (vi) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

12 (4) by inserting after clause (vi) the following 

13 new clause: 

14 ‘‘(vii) the Nonappropriated Fund 

15 Health Benefits Program of the Depart16 ment of Defense, established under section 

17 349 of the National Defense Authorization 

18 Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 

19 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 1587 note).’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

22 1501(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

23 and shall be executed immediately after the amendments 

24 made by such section 1501(b). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-05-033] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

October 18, 2005 at 11 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none 

2. Minutes 

3. Ratification List 

4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-308-310 and 520-521 (Second Review)(Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before October 31, 2005.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 
      ( print page 60369)    
*By order of the Commission.*

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05-20791 Filed 10-13-05; 11:07 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 23.3



CONSENT OF BRUCE E. WALDMAN



I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31076), Form S-3 (File No. 333-109607) and Form S-3
(File No. 333-40936) of Private Media Group, Inc. of my report dated March 10, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of Private North America Ltd. at December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and December 31, 2001,
which report is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.



Sherman Oaks, California



March 26, 2004



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Bruce E. Waldman, C.P.A.
|Bruce E. Waldman, C.P.A.    



---

To the Board of Directors and

Shareholders of Private North America Ltd.



I
have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Private North America Ltd. as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the related statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2003.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.



I conducted my audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit
provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.



In my opinion,
based on my audit, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Private North America Ltd. at December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the three years ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Bruce E. Waldman       
|Bruce E. Waldman,          
|Certified Public Accountant
|Sherman Oaks, California   
|March 10, 2004
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                May                18, 2007 |                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |                                                                                                               |
|                                        |                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                  |                                                                                                               | */s/                Anju                Tandon                          * |
|                                             | *Anju                Tandon**President,                Chief Executive**and                Financial Officer* |

----
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Denia Enterprises Inc.(the "Company")
on  Form 10-QSB  for  the   period   ended   July 31, 2006   as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on the   date   hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities    and on the   dates   indicated below,   hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 22, 2006


/s/ Zoran Pudar
---------------------------------
Zoran Pudar, President and C.E.O.
Principal Executive Officer
STATE v. J.C.

405PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Lauren Tally Earnhardt, Willliam P. Hart, Assistant Attorney Generals, Adren Harris, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for J.C.

State of N. C. Judicial Dept., for N.C. Judicial Department.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of November 2017 by Petitioner to Proceed Under a Pseudonym:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."