alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6

                            INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
                            -------------------------

         THIS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of the 31st
day of December, 2001, made by HUMPHREY HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Virginia limited partnership (the "Indemnitor"), for the benefit of James I.
Humphrey, Jr. (the "Indemnitee"), provides:

         1. Recitals. Supertel Hospitality, Inc., a predecessor of Indemnitor's
            --------
parent, and Mercantile Bank National Association (the "Lender"), have entered
into a Loan Agreement (as it may be amended, the "Loan Agreement") pursuant to
which the Lender agreed to lend certain amounts to the Indemnitor. In connection
with the Loan Agreement, Indemnitee executed a Guaranty Agreement dated April
10, 1996 and a Modification and Reaffirmation of Guaranty dated as of April 27,
2001 pursuant to which the Indemnitee guaranteed certain obligations of Supertel
Hospitality, Inc. pursuant to the Loan Agreement (collectively, the "Guaranty").

         2. Indemnification. The Indemnitor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold
            ---------------
harmless the Indemnitee for any payment made by, and against any and all other
losses imposed upon, incurred by, or asserted against, the Indemnitee, arising
out of or based upon the Guarantee.

         3. Notices. All notices to the Indemnitor and the Indemnitee hereunder
            -------
shall be in writing and shall be effective when received at, in the case of the
Indemnitee, the address set forth below:

         James I. Humphrey, Jr.
         7170 Riverwood Drive
         Columbia, Maryland 21046
         Fax: (443) 259-4999

and in the case of the Indemnitor, the address set forth below:

         Humphrey Hospitality Trust, Inc.
         7170 Riverwood Drive
         Columbia, Maryland 21046
         Attn: President
         Fax: (443) 259-4999

or at such other addresses as the parties may designate from time to time in
writing.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS.]


<PAGE>


         WITNESS the following signature.

                             HUMPHREY HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                             By:      HUMPHREY HOSPITALITY REIT TRUST,
                                      general partner


                             By: /s/ George R. Whittemore
                             Name: George R. Whittemore
                             Title: President

                                      -2-
#### Isidra C. CHAVEZ, Plaintiff, v. FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

No. EP-89-CA-80.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division.

April 5, 1989.

*178Jose Montes, Jr., Volk, Montes & Lewis, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff.

Carl H. Green, Grambling & Mounce, El Paso, Tex., and Mark D. Dore, Alaniz & Schraeder, Houston, Tex., for defendant.

ORDER OF REMAND

HUDSPETH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Isidra C. Chavez filed suit in the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, against her former employer, Farah Manufacturing Company, Inc. In her original ■ petition in state court, the Plaintiff alleged that she was injured while in the course and scope of her employment for the Defendant; that she filed a claim for compensation under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, and that she was thereafter discharged by the Defendant in violation of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307c. The Defendant filed a petition for removal to this Court, contending that the United States District Court had original jurisdiction over the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 185. Because the Court finds that this case falls within a category of cases specifically made nonremovable by Congress, the Court will order *sua sponte*that it be remanded to state court.

Title 28, United States Code, Section 1445(c) provides as follows:

> A civil action in any State court arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any district court of the United States.

The statute codified as Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 8307c was enacted by the legislature of the State of Texas as part of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. *Fernandez v. Reynolds Metals Co.,*384 F.Supp. 1281, 1283 (S.D.Tex.1974). The action filed by the Plaintiff in the instant case is clearly one arising under the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Texas. Furthermore, it is now clearly established law that actions brought under a state workers’ compensation law are not preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. *Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.,*— U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1877, 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988). Removal to this Court is clearly barred by Section 1445(c). After a short visit on this side of the street, this case should be returned to the state district court where it belongs.

It is therefore ORDERED that this cause be, and it is hereby, REMANDED to the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas.
Opinion issued November 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00731-CV

———————————

AIMS ATM, LLC, Appellant

V.

DARBAR, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1002864

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, AIMS ATM, LLC, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); 

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts 
2

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We 

dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”), I, John Fanelli III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ John Fanelli III           |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | John Fanelli III               |
|   | Executive Vice   President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |

 

 

Dated:  November 14, 2016

 

----
April 3, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF K .D.H., A CHILD
NO. 14

- 13

- 00006

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed, October 8, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the caus e for procee dings consistent with the court ’ s opinion. W e further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Jennifer Kegresse and Daniel Eugene Higgins, jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certified below for obser vance.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD EMANUEL

No. 7216SC782

(Filed 20 December 1972)

Appeal by defendant from *Hobgood, Judge,*26 June 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Scotland County.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of imprisonment imposed upon his plea of guilty to a charge of armed robbery.

*Attorney General Morgan by Deputy Attorney General Bullock for the State.*

*Jennings G. King for defendant appellant.*

GRAHAM, Judge.

After the case was docketed and briefs were filed in this Court, defendant moved for leave to withdraw his appeal. We denied his motion and have reviewed the appeal on the merits.

The record supports the trial judge’s adjudication that defendant’s plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and vol*165untarily made, and no error appears in the record. We find and hold that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Brock concur.
Exhibit
      32.1











**IMPLANT
      SCIENCES CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation. (the
      "Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony
      Armini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














*/s/*  Anthony
      Armini


Anthony
      Armini


Chief
      Executive Officer


October
      12, 2006
SYKES, et al.

v.

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

248A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Robert E. Fields, III, Attorney at Law, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorney at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, Leon E. Porter, Attorney at Law, Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salemfor Sykes, Susan, et al.

Elizabeth L. Winters, Attorney at Law, Chad D. Hansen, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Adam H. Charnes, Attorney at Law, for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina.

D. Erik Albright, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Cigna Healthcare of North Carolina, Inc.

Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Medcost LLC.

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

Benjamin R. Norman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

W. Michael Dowling, Attorney at Law.

*623The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of January 2019 for Joshua B. Simon to be admitted Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of RTI International Metals, Inc. of our reports, dated
January 25, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

o        Form S-8 (File No. 33-36248) relating to the RMI 1989 Stock Option
         Incentive Plan

o        Form S-8 (File No. 33-38340) relating to the RMI Bargaining Unit
         Employees Savings and Investment Plan

o        Form S-8 (File No. 33-38339) relating to the RMI Savings and
         Investment Plan

o        Form S-8 (File No. 33-63025) relating to the RMI Titanium Company 1995
         Stock Plan

o        Form S-8 (File No. 333-83028) relating to the RTI International
         Metals, Inc. 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.

o        Form S-3 (File No. 333-73281) relating to shares issued to selling
         shareholders in connection with the acquisition of New Century Metals,
         Inc.

o        Form S-3 (File No. 333-86729) relating to debt and equity securities
         of RTI International Metals, Inc.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the
registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-73281 and 333-86729).


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 14, 2002
Exhibit 99
                                   ----------

               Letter To Commission Pursuant To Temporary Note 2T
               --------------------------------------------------

May 10, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 2T to Item 310 of Regulation S-B, OnCourse
Technologies, Inc has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

Very truly yours,

OnCourse Technologies, Inc.

/s/ William C. Brown
Chief Financial Officer

                                   <Page 120>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7237

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTONIO JAVIER GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-87-313, CA-97-1117-1-6) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benson Barry Weintraub, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Garcia , Nos. CR-87-313; CA-97-1117-1-6 (D.S.C. Jul. 10. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,193
<INVENTORY>                                     33,547
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,143
<PP&E>                                           8,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,012
<BONDS>                                         88,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           42,908
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,440
<SALES>                                        231,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,382
<CGS>                                          157,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   439
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                        |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed
original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



29
<PAGE>   1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          AQUA VIE BEVERAGE CORPORATION


           Aqua Vie Beverage Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Company"), does hereby certify:

           FIRST: That Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company is hereby amended by adding to the end thereof a new paragraph reading
in its entirety as follows:

           "The issued and outstanding shares of common stock, Class A Preferred
           Shares ("Class A Preferred") and Class B Preferred Shares ("Class B
           Preferred") of the Company shall be and hereby are reclassified and
           combined into a lesser number of shares of common, Class A Preferred
           or Class B Preferred stock, as the case may be, at a ratio of 5:1,
           such that each five (5) shares of common, Class A Preferred and Class
           B Preferred stock issued and outstanding shall be reclassified and
           combined into and become respectively one share of common, one share
           of Class A Preferred or one share of Class B Preferred stock.
           Fractional shares resulting from the reclassification and combination
           shall be rounded to the nearest thousandth of a share".

           SECOND: That the foregoing amendment was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors and stockholders of the Company in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

           THIRD: That the effective date of this Certificate of Amendment shall
be midnight on the day it is filed with the Secretary of State.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 10th day of November,
1998.


                                             AQUA VIE BEVERAGE CORPORATION

                                             By: /s/ John Cooper, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                John Cooper, Jr., Secretary
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Knight Energy Corp. (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce
      A. Hall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge, Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
      2002,





i.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





ii.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                BRUCE A. HALLBruce
                A. Hall, Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                March 31, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                      |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: RE APPOINTMENT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA INTEREST ON LA WY ERS TRUST ACCOUNT BOARD : : : : : : : No. 137 DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 11 th day of August , 2015 , Ourania Papademetriou , Esquire, Philadelphia , is hereby re appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers Trust Account Board for a term of three years commencing September 1, 2015

.