alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4786 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4786

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide authority to compensate Federal employees for the 2-day 
 period in which authority to make expenditures from the Highway Trust 
                  Fund lapsed, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION AND RATIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.

    (a) Compensation for Federal Employees.--Any Federal employees 
furloughed as a result of the lapse in expenditure authority from the 
Highway Trust Fund after 11:59 p.m. on February 28, 2010, through March 
2, 2010, shall be compensated for the period of that lapse at their 
standard rates of compensation, as determined under policies 
established by the Secretary of Transportation.
    (b) Ratification of Essential Actions.--All actions taken by 
Federal employees, contractors, and grantees for the purposes of 
maintaining the essential level of Government operations, services, and 
activities to protect life and property and to bring about orderly 
termination of Government functions during the lapse in expenditure 
authority from the Highway Trust Fund after 11:59 p.m. on February 28, 
2010, through March 2, 2010, are hereby ratified and approved if 
otherwise in accord with the provisions of the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-68).
    (c) Funding.--Funds used by the Secretary to compensate employees 
described in subsection (a) shall be derived from funds previously 
authorized out of the Highway Trust Fund and made available or limited 
to the Department of Transportation by the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-117) and shall be subject to the obligation 
limitations established in such Act.
    (d) Expenditures From Highway Trust Fund.--To permit expenditures 
from the Highway Trust Fund to effectuate the purposes of this section, 
this section shall be deemed to be a section of the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-68), as 
in effect on the date of the enactment of the last amendment to such 
Resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4786

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide authority to compensate Federal employees for the 2-day 
 period in which authority to make expenditures from the Highway Trust 
                  Fund lapsed, and for other purposes.
```
COUNTY OF DURHAM v. BURNETTE

404A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Mary McCullers Reece, Attorney at Law, Smithfield, for Burnette, Robert

Geri Ruzage, Senior Assistant County Attorney, for County of Durham, by and through Durham DSS, ex rel: Sharon L. Wilson and Tiffany A. King

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of January 2019 by Defendant to Strike Appellant's Second Argument:

*405"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40


                                  PULITZER INC.
                           RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD

This Certificate sets forth the terms of the restricted stock unit award made by
Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company") to Robert C. Woodworth ("Executive") on December
6, 2001 (the "Award Date") pursuant to the Pulitzer Inc. 1999 Key Employees'
Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

         1. Number of Shares Covered by Award. The number of units ("Units")
covered by this award is 28,000, each Unit being the notional equivalent of one
share of common stock of the Company. The Company has credited the 28,000 Units
to a bookkeeping account maintained by the Company in the Executive's name,
effective as of the Award Date. The number of Units credited to the Executive's
account will be adjusted to reflect capital changes, if any, in accordance with
the terms of the Plan.


         2. Vesting. The Units covered by this award will vest at the end of
three years from the Award Date, subject to the Executive's continuing
employment or service with the Company, or, if earlier, upon the occurrence of
an event which would cause the acceleration of vesting of the restricted stock
unit award made to the Executive under his employment agreement with the Company
dated December 18, 1998.


         3. Dividend Equivalents. The Company will make cash payments to the
Executive equal to the dividends that would have been paid on the shares
represented by the Units credited to the Executive's account as if the Executive
owned those shares outright. The dividend equivalent payments will be made as
soon as practicable after dividends are paid on the Company's outstanding
shares.


         4. Distribution of Shares. If and when the Units become vested, the
Company will transfer to the Executive a number of shares of Common Stock equal
to the number of Units then credited to the Executive's account in full
satisfaction of the Executive's interest hereunder, subject, however, to such
deferral requirements as the Company may impose in order to avoid a limitation
of its income tax deduction attributable to such transfer by reason of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.


         5. Withholding. All amounts payable to the Executive hereunder, whether
in cash or in kind, will be subject to applicable withholding requirements.


Accepted and Agreed to by:                   PULITZER INC.



/s/ Robert C. Woodworth                      By: /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
Robert C. Woodworth                              Alan G. Silverglat
                                                 Senior Vice President-Finance
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Beacon Financial Futures Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Stratton, the Chief Executive Officer of Beacon Management Corporation (USA) as General Partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



THE BEACON FINANCIAL FUTURES FUND, L.P.By: Beacon Management Corporation (USA), General Partner of the PartnershipBy:

/s/ Mark S. StrattonMark S. StrattonChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2005




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



19
**Exhibit 10.25**To: Elliot GoldsteinFrom: Russell HowardRe: Tax Equalization Agreement for 2007Date: November 13, 2006As an expatriate in Denmark you are subject to Danish income taxes. During the first three yearsof residency in Denmark, expatriates benefit from a tax holiday during which their income is taxedat a rate of 25%. Your residency in Denmark reached 3 years as of February 24, 2006. Maxygenentered an International Tax Assistance Agreement with you in 2005 to cover the period throughFebruary 2007. As we have discussed, Maxygen proposes to enter a Tax Equalization Agreement withyou to cover the balance of calendar year 2007. This agreement does not provide for any taxequalization payments subsequent to December 31, 2007. Any such payments would be subject toapproval of the Maxygen Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee and a separate tax equalizationagreement covering the relevant period.To provide you a net income level approximately equal to what you would receive if you were workingat Maxygen, Inc. in Redwood City, CA and subject to US and California income and social taxesMaxygen will, in addition to your base salary, make the following tax equalization payments to you:     • February 15, 2007 109,740 DKK• May 15, 2007 358,430 DKK• August 15, 2007 358,430 DKK• October 15, 2007 358,430 DKKThese payments constitute the entirety of your tax assistance payments from Maxygen throughDecember 31, 2007, except with respect to any performance bonus you receive in 2007 for yourperformance in 2006.Maxygen will make a separate tax equalization payment to you with respect to any performance bonusyou receive for 2006 that is paid in 2007. The amount of this payment will be determined on aformula basis with the payment equal to the product of: 57.7% and the 2006 performance bonus youreceive.Receipt of tax equalization payments is dependent upon your being employed by Maxygen and beingsubject to Denmark income taxes on the scheduled payment date. Tax equalization payments to youwill be made via the Denmark payroll and will be subject to Danish taxation.
Page 1 of 2

 
Thank you for your continued dedication and hard work in helping Maxygen’s success. Together, welook forward to continued progress and success of the company during 2007.Very truly yours,   /s/ Russell Howard 11/13/2006   Russell Howard
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel P. OBrien, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ DANIEL P. OBRIEN                               
|Daniel P. OBrien                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|December 9, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 10.18
 AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
 Amendment Existing Repurchase Agreement Repurchase Agreement Sellers Seller MSB MSMCI Buyers Buyer Agent
 RECITALS
    SECTION 1. Amendments
   50/30 Mortgage Loan




---



##### 



SECTION 2. Conditions Precedent Amendment Effective Date
 Delivered Documents
 Amendment
 Other Documents
 No Default
 SECTION 3. Representations and Warranties
 -2-




---



##### 



SECTION 4. Limited Effect provided however
 SECTION 5. Counterparts
 SECTION 6. GOVERNING LAW . THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND
INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
  -3-




---



##### 



SELLERS NC CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    President NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    Executive Vice President NC ASSET HOLDING, L.P.By:
    NC DELTEX, LLC, its general partnerBy:
    NC Capital Corporation, its sole memberand managerBy:
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    President HOME123 CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    Executive Vice President [Amendment
No. 4 to New Century Repurchase Agreemennt].




---



##### 



NEW CENTURY CREDIT CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kevin CloydName:
    Kevin CloydTitle:
    President [Amendment
No. 4 to New Century Repurchase Agreemennt].




---



##### 



MORGAN STANLEY BANK,as a BuyerBy:
    /s/ Deborah P. GoodmanName:
    Deborah P. GoodmanTitle:
    VP MORGAN STANLEY MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC., as a Buyer and as the AgentBy:
    /s/ Deborah P. GoodmanName:
    Deborah P. GoodmanTitle:
    VP [Amendment
No. 4 to New Century Repurchase Agreemennt].
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than October 11, 2005.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Andre Anderson, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:                

*1.  William Schwing Patout, III*, Franklin, Louisiana; Robert Bernadas Patout and Judith Hill Patout, both of Jeanerette, Louisiana; and Rivers Martin Patout, Jeanerette, Louisiana; to acquire additional voting shares of Jeanerette First National Bancorp, Inc., Jeanerette, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of The First National Bank of Jeanerette, Jeanerette, Louisiana.                

**B.  Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Tracy Basinger, Director, Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California  94105-1579:                

*1.  Enoch Andrus Ludlow*, Provo, Utah; to acquire additional voting shares of Far West Bancorporation, Provo, Utah, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Far West Bank, Provo, Utah.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 21, 2005.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-19215 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Kenneth JACKSON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Mike THOMAS, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 81529.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 24, 2003.

Gidget A. Angerillo, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Leneigha Downs, Union, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Jackson (Jackson) appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Mike Thomas following a non-jury trial on Jackson’s civil action.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).2

1

. This appeal does not raise any issue regarding the portion of the judgment in favor of Jackson and against the Director of Revenue on Count III of Jackson’s petition.

2

. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is hereby denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1097

MICHAEL PRICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN RUNYON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-2189-JFM) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Price, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Price seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the appellee on Price’s employmentdiscrimination claim. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Price’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. When an officer or agency of the United States is a party, parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 22, 1999. Price’s notice of appeal was filed on January 14, 2000. Because Price failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael P. ODonnellMichael P. ODonnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


August 23, 2007
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB 25, 2010 J OHN LEY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 11 83 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 8- 00 00 5- CR-J -2 0J RK UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us TELMORE BARRINGTON DIXON, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di stric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Feb ru ary 25 , 20 10 ) Befo re HULL, MARCUS an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s PER CURI AM: Don al d M ai rs , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Telm or e Barrin gt on Dix on inth is di rectcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withdraw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andDix on ’s con vi ct io n and se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED .

2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20805]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


October 20, 2005 Public Hearing

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
70, Number 187, Page 56746) on September 28, 2005. No requests were 
received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing in conjunction with OPIC's 
October 27, 2005 Board of Directors meeting scheduled for 2 p.m. on 
October 20, 2005 has been cancelled.
    Contact Person for Information: Information on the hearing 
cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, 
via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7714131800193718071e1459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8be8efe4fce5cbe4fbe2e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20805 Filed 10-13-05; 12:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>