alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4910 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and enact the 

Empowering Patients First Act in order to provide incentives to encourage health insurance coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2010 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, Education and Labor, Ways and Means, the 

Judiciary, Rules, the Budget, Appropriations, House Administration, and 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and enact the Empowering Patients First Act in order 

to provide incentives to encourage health insurance coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA. 

4 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec5 tion and Affordable Care Act, such Act is repealed, and 

6 the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4910 IH

1 are restored or revived as if such Act had not been en2 acted. 

3 SEC. 2. ENACTMENT OF EMPOWERING PATIENTS FIRST 

4 ACT. 

5 The bill H.R. 3400 (111th Congress), as introduced 

6 in the House of Representatives on July 30, 2009, is here7 by enacted into law. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF BDO AUDIBERIA AUDITORES

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(File No. 333-31076), Form S-8 (File No. 333-122329), Form S-3 (File No. 333-109607) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-40936) of Private Media Group, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule II of Private Media Group, Inc., and our report dated March 29, 2007 with respect to Private Media Group, Inc. managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Private Media Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.



|                           
|---------------------------
|BDO Audiberia Auditores    
|                           
|/s/ BDO Audiberia Auditores

Barcelona, Spain

March 30, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                           PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                    FORM 10-K

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


           The undersigned directors and officers of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.,
an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby constitute and appoint, Richard
P. Elliott and Ronald J. Cozean, and each of them, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys-in-fact or attorney-in-fact of the
undersigned, for him and in his name, place and stead, to execute and file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities
Act of 1934 the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report"), with any and all amendments, supplements and exhibits thereto, to
execute and file any and all other documents to be filed with the Commission
relating to the Annual Report, each such attorney to have full power to act with
or without the other, and to have full power and authority to do and perform, in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary,
advisable or appropriate to be done in the premises, hereby ratifying and
approving the act of said attorneys and any of them and any such substitute.

                         EXECUTED as of March 27, 2002.


/s/ Edward F. Crawford                        /s/ Richard P. Elliott
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Edward F. Crawford                            Richard P. Elliott
President, Chief Executive Officer,           Vice President and Chief Financial
Chairman of the Board and Director            Officer


/s/ Matthew V. Crawford                       /s/ James W. Wert
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Matthew V. Crawford                           James W. Wert
Senior Vice President and Director            Director


/s/ Ronna Romney                              /s/ Kevin R. Greene
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Ronna Romney                                  Kevin R. Greene
Director                                      Director


/s/ Lewis E. Hatch                            /s/ Thomas E. McGinty
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Lewis E. Hatch, Jr.                           Thomas E. McGinty
Director                                      Director


/s/ Lawrence O. Selhorst
-----------------------------------
Lawrence O. Selhorst
Director
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  --------------------------------------------------------------------    In connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Joseph Corrao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 24, 2010  /s/ Mark Joseph Corrao Mark Joseph Corrao Chief Financial Officer
Order entered April 25, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00131-CR

TYLON LADARRYL GREER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 32082

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. 

We abated for the appointment of counsel. On April 19, 2022, a 

supplemental clerk’s record was filed with the trial court’s appointment of Jason 

Duff. We DIRECT the Clerk to list Mr. Duff as counsel of record for appellant.

All future correspondence shall be sent to Mr. Duff at the address on file with the 

Court.
The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed. We ORDER appellant’s 

brief due by June 17, 2022.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Keli 

Aiken, Presiding Judge, 354th Judicial District Court; to Jason Duff; and to the

Hunt County District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ACCREDO HEALTH, INCORPORATED FOR THE YEARS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,395
<INVENTORY>                                     32,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,920
<PP&E>                                           9,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,281
<BONDS>                                         37,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,229
<SALES>                                        335,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,035
<CGS>                                          291,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,896
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONATE ED

PR 06-0422

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF

LINDA A. BURROWS

OCT 1 3 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State ot Montana

ORDER

Linda A. Burrows has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement

for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of her

application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for

admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken

"within three years preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3,

Rules of Admission. Burrows passed the MPRE in 2000 when seeking licensure to practice

law in the State of California, where she was admitted. Burrows has since practiced law

for 13 years "without any ethical or disciplinary issues in any jurisdiction where licensed

or where admitted pro hac vice." Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Linda A. Burrows to waive the

three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes of her current application for

admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of

the Board of Bar Examiners at the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this 1 3 —day of October, 2020.

Chief Justice

4.

10/13/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422
g-;/ 2-IL
#### ASHBY R. ROTH, VINCENT P. ROTH and ASHBY D. ROTH, minors by their guardian ad litem ASHBY R. ROTH v. PATRICIA A. PARSONS

No. 7226SC609

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Parent and Child § 4— alienation of affection of parent — no right of action

Minor children may not maintain an action for the alienation of the affection of their father.

Appeal by plaintiffs Vincent P. Roth and Ashby D. Roth from *McLean, Judge,*at the Regular 22 May 1972 Civil “C” Session of Mecklenburg Superior Court.

In this action, commenced on 14 March 1972, plaintiff Ashby R. Roth seeks to recover for (1) alienation of affection of her husband by defendant and (2) criminal conversation by defendant with her husband. In a third cause of action the minor plaintiffs seek to recover for the alienation of affection of their father by defendant.

As to the third cause of action defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56. Following a hearing the court sustained defendant’s motion and from judgment dismissing their action, the minor plaintiffs appealed.

*Richard A. Cohan for plaintiff appellant.*

*Wade and Carmichael by R. C. Carmichael, Jr., for defendant appellee.*

*647BRITT, Judge.

We hold that the court properly dismissed the third cause of action. Although appellants attempt to distinguish their case from *Henson v. Thomas,*231 N.C. 173, 56 S.E. 2d 432 (1949), we think the legal principles1 in the cases are the same and that the majority opinion in *Henson*is controlling here. For that reason, the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58714-58715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Cancer Institute, including consideration of personnel qualifications 
and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute Clinical Sciences and Epidemiology.
    Date: November 7, 2005.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 
9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 11 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, Versailles I, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Brian E. Wojcik, PhD, Senior Review 
Administrator, Institute Review Office, Office of the Director, 
National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 2114, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7628, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#23544c49404a4841634e424a4f0d4d4a4b0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70071f1a13191b12301d11191c5e1e19185e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

[[Page 58715]]

    Dated: September 30, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20251 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6646

ARTHUR COLEMAN, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

E. RICHARD BAZZLE, Warden, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, Chief District 

Judge. (0:06-cv-03493-DCN) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Arthur Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Arthur Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coleman

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Allen MCABEE

No. COA18-25

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

REVERSED IN PART. VACATED IN PART.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ DAVID GAODavid GaoChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4954 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4954

 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide recourse under the 
  patent law for persons who suffer competitive injury as a result of 
                            false markings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

 Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Conyers, 
Mr. Coble, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Franks of Arizona, and Mr. Daniel E. Lungren 
of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide recourse under the 
  patent law for persons who suffer competitive injury as a result of 
                            false markings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FALSE MARKING.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 292 of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) A person who has suffered a competitive injury as a result of 
a violation of this section may file a civil action in a district court 
of the United States for recovery of damages adequate to compensate for 
the injury.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas GutierrezThomas GutierrezPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


August 23, 2007
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1) The accompanying  quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934,  and

 

(2) The information contained in the accompanyingreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: June 14, 2010 | /s/ Robert J. Ferguson                                     |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Robert J. Ferguson, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|                     |                                                       |
|                     |                                                       |
| Date: June 14, 2010 | /s/ Brett L. Frevert                                       |
|                     | Brett L. Frevert, Interim Chief Financial Officer          |

 

1

----
No. 75-6297.

#### Fiallo, a minor, by Rodriguez, et al. *v.*Levi, Attorney General, et al.

Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 426 U. S. 919.] Motion of John E. Kirklin, Esquire, to permit Janet M. Calvo to argue *pro hac vice*on behalf of appellants granted.
Exhibit  4.1     Advisory  and  Consulting  Agreement


                    Number  of  Shares  and  Options
                    --------------------------------

     4.1(a)                     4,800,000

     4.1(b)                       200,000

     Miscellaneous                200,000