alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QUEVEDO-WOOLF v. OVERHOLSER, et al.

361P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2018

James P. Hoffman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Overholser, Merry Eileen.

William W. Cameron, Attorney at Law, Salisbury.

Jessica S. Bullock, Carolyn J. Woodruff, Attorneys at Law, Greensboro, for Quevedo-Woolf, Celina.

Daniel Carter, for Carter, Daniel.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Plaintiff to Stay 6 November 2018 Trial Court Hearing:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 5th of November 2018."
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5049 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the matters covered 

by preseparation counseling provided to members of the Armed Forces 

and their spouses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the matters covered by preseparation counseling provided to 

members of the Armed Forces and their spouses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Families Fi5 nancial Preparedness Act’’. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5049 IH

1 SEC. 2. MATTERS COVERED BY PRESEPARATION COUN2 SELING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES AND THEIR SPOUSES. 

4 Section 1142(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘job place7 ment counseling for the spouse’’ and inserting ‘‘in8 clusion of the spouse when counseling regarding the 

9 matters covered by paragraphs (9), (10), and (16) 

10 is provided, job placement counseling for the spouse, 

11 and the provision of information on survivor benefits 

12 available under the laws administered by the Sec13 retary of Defense or the Secretary of Veterans Af14 fairs’’; 

15 (2) in paragraph (9), by inserting before the pe16 riod the following: ‘‘, including information on budg17 eting, saving, credit, loans, and taxes’’; 

18 (3) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘and employ19 ment’’ and inserting ‘‘, employment, and financial’’; 

20 (4) by striking paragraph (16) and inserting 

21 the following new paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(16) Information on home loan services and 

23 housing assistance benefits available under the laws 

24 administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

25 and counseling on responsible borrowing practices.’’; 

26 and 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5049 IH

1 (5) in paragraph (17), by inserting before the 

2 period the following: ‘‘, and information regarding 

3 the means by which the member can receive addi4 tional counseling regarding the member’s actual en5 titlement to such benefits and apply for such bene6 fits’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59394-59395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
Reform

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises all interested persons of a public meeting 
of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Thursday, October 27, 2005. The 
meeting will be held via teleconference and will begin at 11 a.m. 
eastern daylight time. Interested parties will be able to listen to the 
meeting. Call-in information will be posted on the Panel's Web site, 
http://www.taxreformpanel.gov, at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX 
(927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef86818980af9b8e979d8a89809d829f8e818a83c1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7aea9a1a887b3a6bfb5a2a1a8b5aab7a6a9a2abe9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a> 
(please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is 
available at http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: The October 27 meeting is the thirteenth meeting of the 
Advisory Panel. At this meeting, the Panel will continue to discuss 
issues associated with reform of the tax code. There is a possibility 
that this meeting will not take place as scheduled. Please check the 
Panel's Web site for updated information.
    Comments: Interested parties are invited to call into the 
teleconference to listen to the meeting; however, no public comments 
will be heard at the meeting. Any written comments with respect to this 
meeting may be mailed to The President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
Reform, 1440 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 2100, Washington,

[[Page 59395]]

DC 20220. All written comments will be made available to the public.
    Records: Records are being kept of Advisory Panel proceedings and 
will be available at the Internal Revenue Service's FOIA Reading Room 
at 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 1621, Washington, DC 20024. The 
Reading Room is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 
through Friday except holidays. The public entrance to the reading room 
is on Pennsylvania Avenue between 10th and 12th streets. The phone 
number is (202) 622-5164 (not a toll-free number). Advisory Panel 
documents, including meeting announcements, agendas, and minutes, will 
also be available on http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.

    Dated: October 7, 2005.
Mark S. Kaizen,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20513 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jamie Kerr, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GLOBAL-E INVESTMENTS, INC.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



Date:  June 25, 2004.



By: /s/  Jamie Kerr

Jamie Kerr

President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of
Vestin Group, Inc. (the Registrant), and Lance K. Bradford, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, that  (1)
    
    the Registrants Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant. Dated: April 14, 2004
    /s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekChief Executive Officer, President and Director Dated: April 14, 2004
    /s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. BradfordChief Financial Officer
Paul GIESEKING and Crazie Goose, LLC, Petitioners, v. TOWN OF GROVER, a municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. COA18-441

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
#### JAMES W. WILLIAMS v. ANNIE ELIZABETH PENDER WILLIAMS.

(Filed 19 June 1968.)

Appeal and Error § 39—

Where appellant dockets record on appeal in the Court of Appeals 153 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, which is 63 days after the time prescribed by Rule 5, and in addition fails to file a brief, the appeal will be dismissed for noncompliance with the rules of the Court upon motion of the appellee.

Appeal by defendant from *Clark, J.,*9 October 1967 Civil Session of CumberlaND Superior Court.

This is a civil action filed 29 July 1965 in the Superior Court of Cumberland County for an absolute divorce on the grounds of one year’s separation. The defendant filed answer denying the separation and a further answer and counterclaim in which she alleged that the plaintiff, without legal provocation or justification, had abandoned and separated himself from the defendant, had been guilty of acts of misconduct, and had failed to provide defendant with necessary subsistence. Defendant prayed that plaintiff’s action for absolute divorce be dismissed and for a judgment for alimony without divorce pursuant to G.S. 50-16. Plaintiff filed a reply, in which he denied the material allegations of defendant’s counteraction. At the *447trial, the jury answered all issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. From judgment of absolute divorce, defendant appealed.

*Thomas H. Williams, Attorney for plaintiff appellee.*

*Marion C. George, Jr., Attorney for defendant appellant.*

Parker, J.

The judgment here appealed from was entered on 11 October 1967. One hundred and fifty-three days thereafter, on 12 March .1968, appellant filed in this court what purports to be a statement of the case on appeal. No brief has been filed by the appellant.

Upon the regular call of the district to which this case belongs, appellee in apt time as provided by Rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court moved to dismiss this appeal for failure of appellant to comply with the rules of this court in perfecting her appeal.

Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice of this court provides that if the record on appeal is not docketed within 90 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, the case may be dismissed; provided, the trial tribunal may, for good cause, extend the time not exceeding 60 days. The record on appeal was docketed in this court 163 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, and 63 days after the time prescribed by Rule 5 within which the record on appeal should have been docketed. In addition, appellant has filed no brief with this court.

On 6 June 1968 appellant filed with this court a petition for writ of *certiorari.*No sufficient grounds were alleged to justify granting such writ as a substitute for an appeal, and the same is being this day denied.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for noncompliance with the rules of this court in perfecting the appeal is allowed and this appeal is

Dismissed.

Mallard, C.J., and Brock, J., concur.
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

June 26, 2008

 

**CONFIDENTIAL**

 

Dear Tamara:

 

Favrille, Inc. (the “Company”)values the contributions that you have made to date, and we feel that you are avital part of the team charged with winding down the Company.

 

The Company wishes to retainyour services and to incentivize you to continue as an employee for as long asthe Company currently anticipates that it will need your services.  We recognize that such continued service islikely to result in you delaying and/or foregoing other employmentopportunities.  Accordingly, if youremain employed with the Company through September 5,2008, the Company will pay you a retention bonus in the form of anenhancement of your base salary by fifty percent (50%) from June 7, 2008through September 5, 2008.  The bonus will be advanced to you on theCompany’s standard payroll dates, beginning June 30, 2008.  In the event that you voluntarily leave theemployment of the Company prior to September 5,2008, the bonus amounts previously advanced to you will be deducted fromyour final paycheck (provided that the amount so deducted shall not cause yourwage for the pay period in question to be reduced below the minimum wagerequired by law), and ***by your signature belowyou expressly authorize the Company to make such a deduction from your finalpay.***  In the event thatthe Company elects to terminate your employment (other than for misconduct)prior to September 5, 2008****you will receive the full retention bonus, calculatedthrough September 5, 2008, in yourfinal pay.  This retention bonus is inaddition to any other form or amount of compensation that you are eligible toreceive pursuant to any other arrangement with the Company.

 

This payment will becontingent upon the following:

 

·                  Continued employment with the Company through**September 5, 2008**;and

·                  That you have not received any typeof disciplinary action or warning or committed any act of misconduct inconnection with your employment.

 

This agreement does notchange the nature of your employment or alter the other terms of youremployment agreement with the Company as set forth in the Employment Agreementdated January 6, 2005, between you and the Company.  You will continue to be bound by the Company’spolicies.  This agreement constitutes thefull and complete expression of our arrangement with respect to the bonusdescribed herein and supersedes any prior oral commitments orrepresentations.  This agreement cannotbe modified except by a written instrument approved and signed by both you andthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer or the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

 

Sincerely,

 
|                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| /s/ John P. Longenecker |   |

 

 

John P. Longenecker,Ph.D.

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

 

 

# **Accepted:**

# ** **

|   /s/ Tamara A. Seymour |   | Date:  |   June 26, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
| Tamara Seymour                    |   |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         656,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  707,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,765,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,243,109
<PP&E>                                         277,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,427,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,544,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,127
<OTHER-SE>                                     791,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,427,712
<SALES>                                     10,273,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,884,517
<CGS>                                        8,260,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,260,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,841,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                64,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             152,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,276,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,276,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,276,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40871 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODRIGO CELESTINO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-75-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rodrigo Celestino-Garcia appeals his sentence for unlawfully entering the United States after having been previously deported. Celestino-Garcia argues that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based upon his prior commission of an aggravated felony, because the charging indictment did not mention the aggravated felony. His argument is foreclosed by United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRUCE YOUNGBAR

No. 769SC806

(Filed 6 April 1977)

Criminal Law § 151— appeal — time for making entry

Defendant’s notice of appeal which was not entered until the 35th day after the last day of the session at which judgment was rendered was not timely, and the purported appeal is dismissed. G.S. 15-180.3(2).

Purported appeal by defendant from *McLelland, Judge.*Judgment entered 5 May 1976 in Superior Court, Franklin County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 15 March 1977.

Defendant was tried and convicted of (1) felonious breaking and entering and (2) felonious larceny. The two charges were consolidated for a judgment of imprisonment for a term of five years.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Sandra M. King, for the State.*

*Thomas F. East for the defendant.*

BROCK, Chief Judge.

This case was called for trial on 4 May 1976 and was concluded by a guilty verdict and the entry of judgment on 5 May 1976. The record on appeal discloses that Judge McLelland signed appeal entries on 11 June 1976 and set the times from that date for the service of proposed record on appeal and the service of proposed alternative record on appeal. There is no showing of notice of appeal being given prior to 11 June 1976. This notice of appeal dated 11 June 1976 was not filed until 17 June 1976 and does not show service on the district attorney.

The session of court during which defendant was tried was a two-week session commencing on 26 April 1976. Defendant’s case was tried during the second week of the session. The two-week session expired by limitation on 7 May 1976. Actually in this instance the session expired 7 May 1976 by adjournment. Defendant’s notice of appeal was not entered until 11 June 1976, the 35th day after the last day of the session at which judgment was rendered.

*785General Statute 15-180.3 (2) provides that notice of appeal in criminal actions may be given by “[f]iling notice of appeal with the clerk of superior court and serving copies thereof upon all adverse parties within 10 days after the last day of the session at which [judgment is] rendered.” The right of appeal is statutory, and the time limitation of the statute is jurisdictional. This purported appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4665 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010 

Mr. MASSA (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KING

of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. 

MEEKS of New York, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mr. 

WEINER, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. CLARKE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. MCMAHON, 

Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, 

Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. MURPHY of New York, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

HINCHEY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. MAFFEI, Mr. LEE of New York, 

and Mr. HIGGINS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, 

as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4665 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary 

2 Smith Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 

5 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

6 to be a reference to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS