alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4895 

To amend section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, to include that 

it is a policy of the Postal Service to ensure reasonable and sustainable 

workloads and schedules for supervisory and management employees and 

to clarify provisions relating to consultation and changes or terminations 

in certain proposals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2010 

Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, 

to include that it is a policy of the Postal Service to 

ensure reasonable and sustainable workloads and schedules for supervisory and management employees and to 

clarify provisions relating to consultation and changes 

or terminations in certain proposals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honesty in Postal 

5 Manager Contracts Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4895 IH

1 SEC. 2. POSTAL SERVICE SUPERVISORY AND OTHER MANA2 GERIAL ORGANIZATIONS. 

3 Section 1004 of title 39, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘to ensure 

6 reasonable and sustainable workloads and schedules 

7 for supervisory and management employees;’’ after 

8 ‘‘other managerial personnel;’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b), in the second sentence, by 

10 inserting ‘‘as provided under subsection (d) and any 

11 changes in, or termination of, pay policies and 

12 schedules and fringe benefit programs for members 

13 of the supervisors’ organization as provided under 

14 subsection (e)’’ before the period; and 

15 (3) in subsection (e)(1), by inserting ‘‘, or ter16 mination of,’’ after ‘‘any changes in’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Section Certifications

EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Gregory J. Bosarge,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Premier Entertainment Biloxi LLC;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e» for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2004

 

 
| /s/     Gregory  J. Bosarge |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory  J. Bosarge                                  |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer                             |   |

 

----
#### AMERICAN CREDIT COMPANY OF WINSTON-SALEM, INC. v. BENJAMIN BROWN

No. 7121DC11

(Filed 3 February 1971)

Rules of Civil Procedure § 51— failure to apply law to the evidence

In this action to recover the balance allegedly due on a conditional sales contract and to recover possession of the automobile covered thereby, plaintiff is entitled to a new trial for failure of the trial judge to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51(a).

Appeal by plaintiff from *Henderson, District Judge,*1 June 1970 Session of Forsyth District Court.

Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due on a conditional sale contract and to recover possession of the automobile covered thereby. Defendant denied he was in default. At the trial before judge and jury the parties stipulated answers to the first three of four issues, i.e., that the defendant executed the contract, that he was indebted to the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint, and that the amount of the indebtedness was $2,601.81. Only one issue was submitted to and answered by the jury as follows:

“4. Is the plaintiff entitled to immediate possession of the automobile described in said contract for its sale and the application of the sale proceeds toward payment of the indebtedness ?

“Answer: No.”

The court entered judgment that the plaintiff is not entitled to the immediate possession of the automobile and that the defendant is and has been entitled to possession. Plaintiff appealed, assigning errors.

*383*Blackwell, Blackwell, Canady, Eller & Jones, by Jack F. Can-ady for plaintiff appellant.*

*White, Crumpler & Pfefferkorn, by Joe P. McCollum, Jr., and James G. White for defendant appellee.*

PARKER, Judge.

In charging the jury the trial judge did not at any time “declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case.”.This he was required to do. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51(a); 7 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Trial, § 33, p. 324, *et seq.*The jury was given no guidance as to what facts, if found by them to be true, would justify them in answering the sole issue submitted to them either in the affirmative or the negative. For failure of the trial judge to comply with the mandate of Rule 51(a), plaintiff is entitled to a

New trial.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Graham concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Wiley BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2973.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 10, 1972.

Wesley G. Hohlbein, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant.

Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Thomas B. Russell, Susan L. Barnes, Asst. U. S. Attys., Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After conviction and sentence in this firearms case, United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336, 92 S.Ct. 515, 30 L.Ed.2d 488 (1971) was decided. With that decision “interstate commerce” takes on a new importance in gun cases.

The case is remanded to the district court to vacate the judgment and reconsider the case in the light of Bass.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael J. Arougheti, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   August 6, 2013    |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/ Michael J.   Arougheti      |   |
| Michael J.   Arougheti          |   |
| Chief Executive   Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
|                            |   |
| Dated:   August 6, 2013    |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/ Penni F. Roll               |   |
| Penni F. Roll                   |   |
| Chief Financial   Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 





| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 

Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




By:
    
    /s/ Russell J. HowardName:
    
    Russell J. HowardTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    March 7, 2008




By:
    
    /s/ Lawrence W. BriscoeName:
    
    Lawrence W. BriscoeTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    March 7, 2008
#### In re Kuang Hsung J. CHUANG, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

No. 89-1252.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted June 5, 1990.

Decided June 28, 1990.

Before STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989) mandates disbarment for a “member of the bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals [who] is convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude.” Pursuant to this statute, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended disbarment of Kuang Hsung Chuang on the ground that he stands convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, *viz.,*wire fraud. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.

In July 1989, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, judgments of conviction were entered against respondent on 22 counts of a felony indictment, including one count of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1982)). On February 28, 1990, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed respondent’s convictions. *United States v. Chuang,*897 F.2d 646 (2d Cir.1990).

In *In re Bond,*519 A.2d 165, 166 (D.C.1986), this court held that convictions under the federal mail fraud and wire fraud statutes are convictions for crimes involving moral turpitude *per se. See also In re Krowen,*573 A.2d 786 (D.C.1990) (mail fraud); *In re John J. Donnelly,*No. M-49-80 (D.C. December 16, 1980) (en banc) (unpublished opinion) (wire fraud). In light of his conviction for wire fraud, respondent’s disbarment is mandated by § 11-2503(a).

*726Accordingly, we order that respondent’s name be, and it hereby is, stricken from the roll of the members of the bar of this court as of November 21, 1989, the date of his suspension from the bar of this court.

*So ordered.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPILHOLDING (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Louis Bertoli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Louis Bertoli*     |
|-------------------------|
| Louis Bertoli           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| August 30, 2016         |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
60484 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Parts 1835 and 1852 

RIN 2700–AC64 

NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation 

(FAR) Supplement—Research and 

Development Abstracts 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the 

proposed rule published Friday, 

October 31, 2003 (68 FR 62048—62049). 

NASA will issue internal guidance to 

automate the collection and transfer of 

Research and Development (R&D) 

abstracts to an appropriate central 

repository where they will be available 

for use by government agencies and 

other users. 

DATES: October 18, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Monique Sullivan, NASA Headquarters, 

Contract Management Division, 

Washington, DC, (703) 553–2560, email: Monique.sullivan-1@nasa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: In the proposed rule 

published Friday, October 31, 2003 (68 

FR 62048—62049), NASA proposed to 

amend the NASA FAR Supplement 

(NFS) to include a requirement for the 

electronic submission of abstracts of the 

planned research to be conducted under 

contracts containing research and 

development (R&D) effort valued at over 

$25,000. The proposed rule added a 

new section 1835.003–70, NASA 

Research and Development (R&D) 

Abstracts, and a related clause, 

1852.235–75, NASA Research and 

Development (R&D) Abstracts. The new 

clause provided for the collections of 

abstracts or summaries for NASAfunded-awards with R&D effort greater 

than $25,000. The requirements of 

section 207(g) of the E-Government Act 

of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–347) provide the 

basis for this change. Section 207(g) 

mandates the development and 

maintenance of a repository that 

integrates information on research and 

development funded by the Federal 

Government. In furtherance of this 

requirement, NASA had also established 

a Web-based database system to collect 

summaries or abstracts for all the 

Agency’s procurements containing 

research and development effort valued 

over $25,000. A NASA Web site was 

further established for recipients of 

NASA R&D contracts to enter their 

abstract data. The proposed rule is 

withdrawn because the automation of 

the requirements of section 207(g) of the 

E-Government Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–

347) voids the need for the proposed 

rule. 

James A. Balinskas, 

Acting Assistant Administrator for 

Procurement. 

[FR Doc. 05–20846 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James R. Sulat, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Maxygen, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 19, 2013



/s/ James R. SulatJames R. SulatChief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Courtney KIMBLE.

No. 2002-KO-2925.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Kimble, Courtney;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Re*1024view, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 94017; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2001 KA 2953.

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), DanielJ. Miller, the Chief Financial Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, tothe best of his knowledge:     1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company for the periods presentedtherein.     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 3rd day of August 2007.          /s/ DANIEL J. MILLER   Daniel J. Miller   Chief Financial Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of this report. A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to PlanetOut Inc. and will be retained by PlanetOut Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William H. Roj, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2006 By:  /s/ William H. Roj   Name:  William H. Roj  Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 2, 2017/s/ R. Kipp deVeerR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: August 2, 2017/s/ Penni F. RollPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.