UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q



ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
from                             to           
                  .


Commission File Number: 001-32248



GRAMERCY CAPITAL CORP.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Maryland(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)

06-1722127(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10170(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(212) 297-1000(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES ý    NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files.) YES o    NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "non-accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer ý

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). YES o    NO ý

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $0.001 par value, was 49,859,322 as of August 6, 2009.

---





GRAMERCY CAPITAL CORP.    INDEX

PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PAGECondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008

1Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)

2Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (loss) for the six months ended June 30,
 2009 (unaudited)

3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)

4Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

6ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

69ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

114ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

115PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

116ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

116ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

116ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

116ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

116ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

116ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

117ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

118SIGNATURES

120


---





PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Gramercy Capital Corp.        Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets        (Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30,
2009

December 31,
2008Assets:Real estate investments, at cost:Land

$
902,958

$
891,500Building and improvements


2,410,975


2,441,839Less: accumulated depreciation


(76,692
)

(47,071
)Total real estate investments, net


3,237,241


3,286,268Cash and cash equivalents


87,610


136,828Restricted cash


200,306


234,781Pledged government securities, net


99,447


101,576Loans and other lending investments, net


1,676,726


2,213,473Commercial mortgage-backed securities


947,663


869,973Investments in joint ventures


102,669


93,919Assets held for sale, net


266,951


192,780Tenant and other receivables, net


20,626


28,129Accrued interest


29,493


25,447Acquired lease assets, net of accumulated amortization of $64,058 and $30,760


480,012


536,212Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $37,281 and $26,451


43,376


53,248Other assets


48,874


48,322Total assets

$
7,240,994

$
7,820,956Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:Mortgage notes payable

$
1,763,690

$
1,833,005Mezzanine loans payable


569,122


580,462Unsecured credit facility





172,301Term loan, credit facility and repurchase facility


64,976


95,897Collateralized debt obligations


2,608,175


2,608,065Junior subordinated notes


150,000


Total secured and other debt


5,155,963


5,289,730Accounts payable and accrued expenses


79,441


88,437Management and incentive fees payable





979Dividends payable


6,981


2,325Accrued interest payable


8,217


8,167Deferred revenue


86,066


98,693Below-market lease liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $102,494 and $53,369


816,012


846,351Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $3,677 and $2,182


19,556


21,051Liabilities related to assets held for sale


67,684


110,543Derivative instruments, at fair value


96,563


157,776Other liabilities


29,787


14,471Deferrable interest debentures held by trusts that issued trust preferred securities





150,000Total liabilities


6,366,270


6,788,523Commitments and contingencies





Stockholders' Equity:Common stock, par value $0.001, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 49,848,333 and 49,852,243 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively


50


50Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001, liquidation preference $115,000, 4,600,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively


111,205


111,205Additional paid-in-capital


1,078,526


1,077,983Accumulated other comprehensive loss


(99,567
)

(160,739
)Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)


(224,211
)

1,222Total Gramercy Capital Corp. stockholders' equity


866,003


1,029,721Non-controlling interests


8,721


2,712Total equity


874,724


1,032,433Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
7,240,994

$
7,820,956


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

---





Gramercy Capital Corp.        Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations        (Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2008

2009

2008RevenuesRental revenue

$
83,298

$
73,286

$
162,750

$
76,985Investment income


44,869


63,003


97,725


137,598Operating expense reimbursements


29,097


29,595


59,022


29,595Gain on sales and other income


1,245


5,029


2,515


9,327Total revenues


158,509


170,913


322,012


253,505Operating ExpensesReal estate taxes


9,356


9,174


18,863


9,174Ground rent and leasehold obligations


4,061


4,056


8,488


4,056Utilities


8,857


9,368


18,755


9,368Direct billable expenses


2,087


1,355


4,250


1,355Other property operating expenses


18,587


20,121


37,829


20,121Total property operating expenses


42,948


44,074


88,185


44,074Net operating income


115,561


126,839


233,827


209,431Other expenses:Interest expense


58,237


74,414


123,511


115,857Management fees


2,115


9,106


7,787


16,251Incentive fee





2,604





5,100Depreciation and amortization


30,039


20,234


57,458


22,064Impairment on loans held for sale


41,951





126,379


Marketing, general and administrative


9,552


4,070


18,335


6,875Provision for loan loss


167,412


23,214


220,183


31,214Total other expenses


309,306


133,642


553,653


197,361Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures


(193,745
)

(6,803
)

(319,826
)

12,070Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures


1,975


1,729


4,187


5,195Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for taxes, gain on extinguishment of debt, and discontinued operations


(191,770
)

(5,074
)

(315,639
)

17,265Gain on extinguishment of debt





17,597


107,229


21,096Provision for taxes


(134
)




(2,401
)

(11
)Net income (loss) from continuing operations


(191,904
)

12,523


(210,811
)

38,350Net income (loss) from discontinued operations


(4,926
)

124


(10,955
)

(233
)Net income (loss)


(196,830
)

12,647


(221,766
)

38,117Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests


1,024


(251
)

1,005


(251
)Net income (loss) attributable to Gramercy Capital Corp


(195,806
)

12,396


(220,761
)

37,866Accrued preferred stock dividends


(2,336
)

(2,336
)

(4,672
)

(4,672
)Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(198,142
)
$
10,060

$
(225,433
)
$
33,194Basic earnings per share:Net income (loss) from continuing operations, net of non-controlling interest and after preferred dividends

$
(3.90
)
$
0.20

$
4.32

$
0.78Net loss from discontinued operations


(0.08
)




(0.20
)

(0.01
)Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(3.98
)
$
0.20

$
4.52

$
0.77Diluted earnings per share:Net income (loss) from continuing operations, net of non-controlling interest and after preferred dividends

$
(3.90
)
$
0.20

$
(4.32
)
$
0.78Net loss from discontinued operations


(0.08
)




(0.20
)

(0.01
)Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(3.98
)
$
0.20

$
(4.52
)
$
0.77Dividends per common share

$


$
0.63

$


$
1.26Basic weighted average common shares outstanding


49,818


51,166


49,839


42,966Diluted weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding


49,818


51,291


49,839


43,167


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

---





Gramercy Capital Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Equity
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Common Stock









Total
Gramercy
Capital
CorpSeries A
Preferred
Stock

Additional Paid-
In-Capital

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Retained Earnings /
(Accumulated
Deficit)

Non-controlling
interest



Comprehensive
Income (loss)Shares

Par Value

TotalBalance at December 31, 2008


49,852

$
50

$
111,205

$
1,077,983

$
(160,739
)
$
1,222

$
1,029,721

$
2,712

$
1,032,433Net loss

















(220,761
)

(220,761
)

(1,005
)

(221,766
)
$
(220,761
)Change in net unrealized loss on derivative instruments














60,883





60,883





60,883


60,883Net unrealized loss on securities previous available for sale














289





289





289


289Issuance of stockstock purchase plan


28








16








16





16Stock based compensationfair value


(32
)







527








527





527Distribution to non-controlling interest holder























(213
)

(213
)Dividends accrued on preferred stock

















(4,672
)

(4,672
)




(4,672
)Non-controlling interest through foreclosure























7,227


7,227Balance at June 30, 2009


49,848

$
50

$
111,205

$
1,078,526

$
(99,567
)
$
(224,211
)
$
866,003

$
8,721

$
874,724

$
(159,589
)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

3

---





Gramercy Capital Corp.        Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows        (Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

Six months ended June 30,2009

2008Operating ActivitiesNet income (loss)

$
(220,761
)
$
37,866Adjustments to net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


63,317


27,405Amortization of leasehold interest


(1,495
)

Non-controlling interest


(1,005
)

251Amortization of acquired leases to rental revenue


(41,844
)

(13,477
)Amortization of deferred costs


5,892


5,446Amortization of discount and other fees


(13,412
)

(12,706
)Payment of capitalized tenant leasing costs


(736
)

Straight- line rent adjustment


14,957


5,052Non-cash impairment charges


145,448


Gains from sale of loans and real estate assets


(8,529
)

(10
)Equity in net (income) loss of joint ventures


(3,873
)

(4,700
)Gain on extinguishment of debt


(107,229
)

(21,697
)Amortization of stock compensation


543


2,672Provision for loan loss


220,183


31,214Unrealized gain on derivative instruments





(2,653
)Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Restricted cash


(3,337
)

(1,666
)Tenant and other receivables


3,537


(3,720
)Other assets


(759
)

25,086Management and incentive fees payable


(899
)

448Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities


(6,877
)

9,734Deferred revenue


(31,138
)

(8,069
)Net cash provided by operating activities


11,983


76,476Investing ActivitiesTransaction costs of business combination





(108,199
)Cash consideration paid for business combination, net of cash acquired of $155,356





(586,825
)Capital expenditures and leasehold costs


(3,717
)

(5,010
)Proceeds from sale of real estate


44,532


44,546Proceeds from sale of joint venture interest


3,028


New investment originations and funded commitments


(41,346
)

(165,107
)Principal collections on investments


67,556


273,274Proceeds from sale of loans and loan commitments





85,132Deposit received for sale of real estate


6,000


Investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities


(75,482
)

(61,736
)Investment in joint venture


(1,698
)

(1,134
)Change in accrued interest income





106Purchase of marketable investments


(7
)

(5,345
)Sale of marketable investments


3,509


1,880Change in restricted cash from investing activities


(914
)

(14,489
)Deferred investment costs


(656
)

(1,499
)Net cash provided by investing activities


805


(544,406
)


4

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

Six months ended June 30,2009

2008Financing ActivitiesProceeds from repurchase facilities


9,500


22,867Repayments of repurchase facilities


(33,201
)

(128,149
)Proceeds from unsecured credit facility





75,000Repayment of unsecured credit facility


(45,000
)

Repayment of mortgage notes


(25,622
)

(716,525
)Proceeds from acquisition financing





1,114,743Change in restricted cash from financing activities


35,792


51,476Repurchase of collateralized debt obligations





(29,603
)Deferred financing costs and other liabilities


(3,246
)

(31,253
)Dividends paid


(16
)

(129,903
)Proceeds from stock options exercised





1,306Distributions to non-controlling interest holders


(213
)

Net proceeds from sale of common stock





46Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities


(62,006
)

230,005Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents


(49,218
)

(237,925
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


136,828


293,126Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
87,610

$
55,201Non-cash activityDeferred gain (loss) and other non-cash activity related to derivatives

$
60,883

$
(6,737
)Issuance of common stock for acquisition advisory costs

$


$
11,213Issuance of common stock in business combination

$


$
378,672Assumptions of mortgage loans

$


$
1,316,004SFAS 141 mark-to-market of debt assumed

$


$
24,743Debt assumed by purchaser in sale of real estate

$
103,621

$
Supplemental cash flow disclosuresCash paid for interest

$
113,155

$
111,046Cash paid for income taxes paid

$
401

$
393


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

---





Gramercy Capital Corp.        Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements        (Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)        June 30, 2009

1. Business and Organization

Gramercy Capital Corp. (the "Company" or "Gramercy") is a self-managed, integrated, commercial real estate finance and property investment company. The Company was formed in
April 2004 and commenced operations upon the completion of its initial public offering in August 2004. On April 1, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of American Financial Realty Trust
(NYSE: AFR) ("American Financial") in a transaction with a total value of approximately $3.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $1.3 billion of American Financial's
secured debt. The acquisition transformed the Company from a pure specialty finance company into a $7.8 billion diversified enterprise with complementary business lines consisting of commercial
real estate finance and property investments.

From
its inception until April 2009, the Company was externally managed and advised by GKK Manager LLC, or the Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green Realty Corp., or SL
Green. On April 24, 2009, the Company completed the internalization of the Company's management through the direct acquisition of the Manager from SL Green. As a result of the internalization,
beginning in May 2009, management and incentive fees payable by the Company to the Manager have ceased, and the Company added 77 former employees of the Manager to its own staff. The Company expensed
$5,010 for the acquisition costs incurred through June 30, 2009 in connection with the Company's acquisition of the Manager. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, SL Green
Operating Partnership, L.P., or SL Green OP, owned approximately 12.5% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock.

The
Company relies on the credit and equity markets to finance and grow its business. Beginning during the second half of 2007 and throughout 2008 and the first two quarters of 2009,
severe credit and liquidity issues in the sub-prime residential lending and single family housing sectors negatively impacted the asset-backed and corporate fixed income markets, and the
equity securities of financial institutions and real estate companies. As the severity of residential sector issues increased, nearly all securities markets experienced reduced liquidity and greater
risk premiums as concerns about
the outlook for the U.S. and world economic growth increased. These concerns continue to persist in 2009 and risk premiums in many capital markets remain at or near all-time highs with
liquidity extremely low or are virtually non-existent when compared to historical standards. As a result, most commercial real estate finance and financial services industry participants,
including the Company, have reduced new investment activity until the capital markets become more stable, the macroeconomic outlook becomes clearer and market liquidity increases. In this environment,
the Company is focused on actively managing portfolio credit, generating and recycling liquidity from existing assets, leasing vacant space, reducing operating and capital expenses and reducing
corporate overhead.

The
Company's commercial real estate finance business, which operates under the name Gramercy Finance, focuses on the direct origination and acquisition of whole loans, bridge loans,
subordinate interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity, commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and other real estate related securities. The Company's property investment
business, which operates under the name Gramercy Realty, focuses on the acquisition and management of commercial properties leased primarily to regulated financial institutions and affiliated users
throughout the United States. These institutions are, for the most part, deposit-taking commercial banks, thrifts and credit unions, which the Company generally refers to as "banks." The Company's
portfolio of wholly-owned and jointly-owned bank branches and office buildings is leased to large banks such as Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, Wachovia Bank National Association (now owned
by Wells Fargo &

6

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

1. Business and Organization (Continued)

Company,
or Wells Fargo), or Wachovia Bank, Regions Financial Corporation, or Regions Financial and Citizens Financial Group, Inc., or Citizens Financial, and to mid-sized and
community banks. Neither Gramercy Finance nor Gramercy Realty is a separate legal entity but are divisions of the Company through which the Company's commercial real estate finance and property
investment businesses are conducted.

Substantially
all of the Company's operations are conducted through GKK Capital LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership. The Company, as the sole general
partner of, and currently the holder of 100% of the common units of the Operating Partnership, has responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the Operating Partnership.
Accordingly, the Company consolidates the accounts of the Operating Partnership. The Company qualified as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
or the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2004 and the Company expects to qualify for the current fiscal year. To maintain the Company's qualification as
a REIT, the Company plans to distribute at least 90% of taxable income.

As
of June 30, 2009, Gramercy Finance held loans and other lending investments and CMBS of $2,726,830 net of fees, discounts, valuation allowances and unfunded commitments,
reserves for possible loan losses, valuation allowances, and other adjustments, with an average spread to 30-day LIBOR of 457 basis points for its floating rate investments, and an average
yield of approximately 8.16% for its fixed rate investments. As of June 30, 2009, Gramercy Finance also held interests in two credit tenant net lease investments, or CTL investments, two
interests in joint ventures
holding fee positions on properties subject to long-term ground leases and a 100% fee interest in a property subject to a long-term ground lease.

As
of June 30, 2009, Gramercy Realty's portfolio consisted of 668 bank branches, 331 office buildings and six land parcels, of which 72 bank branches and one office building were
partially owned through joint ventures. Gramercy Realty's wholly-owned properties aggregated approximately 26.0 million rentable square feet and its partially-owned properties aggregated
approximately 0.7 million rentable square feet, including 0.4 million rentable square feet in an unconsolidated joint venture. As of June 30, 2009, the occupancy of Gramercy
Realty's wholly-owned properties was 88.0% and the occupancy for its partially-owned properties was 99.9%. Gramercy Realty's two largest tenants are Bank of America and Wachovia Bank, and for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, they represented approximately 44.4% and 15.9%, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2009, they represented approximately 42.7% and
15.6%, respectively, of the rental revenue of the Company's portfolio. As of June 30, 2009, Bank of America and Wachovia Bank occupied approximately 47.1% and 18.1%, respectively, of Gramercy
Realty's total rentable square feet.

Due
to the nature of the business of Gramercy Realty's tenant base, Gramercy Realty typically enters into long-term leases with its financial institution tenants. As of
June 30, 2009, the weighted average remaining term of Gramercy Realty's leases was 10.0 years and approximately 79.9% of its base revenue was derived from long-term leases
with financial institution tenants. With in-house capabilities in acquisitions, asset management, property management and leasing, Gramercy Realty is focused on maximizing the value of its
portfolio through strategic sales, effective and efficient property management, asset management and leasing.

7

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

1. Business and Organization (Continued)

Basis of Quarterly Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, it
does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for complete financial statements. In management's opinion,
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The 2009 operating results for the period presented are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statement at that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP
for complete financial statements.

The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date that the financial statements were issued, which was August 10, 2009, the date of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company's accounts and those of the Company's subsidiaries which are
wholly-owned or controlled by the Company, or entities which are variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary under FASB Interpretation No. 46R, or FIN 46R,
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN 46R requires a variable interest entity, or VIE, to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party that
absorbs a majority of the VIE's anticipated losses and/or a majority of the expected returns. The Company has evaluated its investments for potential classification as variable interests by evaluating
the sufficiency of each entity's equity investment at risk to absorb losses, and determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary for one variable interest entity and has included the accounts
of this entity in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Entities which the Company does not control and entities which are VIE's, but where the Company is not the primary beneficiary, are
accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company's ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS from a single issuer may provide the Company with the right to control the
foreclosure/workout process on the underlying loans. There are certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a qualifying
special-purpose entity ("QSPE") does not consolidate that entity unless the investor has the unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate. FASB Statement No. 140, or SFAS No. 140,
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of

8

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Liabilities,"
provides the requirements for an entity to qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE exception, the special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and must continue to
satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A special-purpose entity's QSPE status can be affected in future periods by activities by its transferors or other involved parties, including the manner
in which certain servicing activities are performed. To the extent that the Company's CMBS investments were issued by a special-purpose entity that meets the QSPE requirements, the Company records
those investments at the purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying special-purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE requirements, the Company follows the guidance set forth in FIN 46R
as the special-purpose entities would be determined to be VIEs.

The
Company has analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing each of its controlling class CMBS investments and the Company believes that the terms of those agreements conform
to industry standards and are consistent with the QSPE criteria.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance that eliminates the qualifying special purpose entity concept including the exemption under which the Company excludes certain CMBS investments
from consolidation. Accordingly, in January 2010, the Company anticipates it will be required to consolidate these CMBS investments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new
standards.

At
June 30, 2009, the Company owned securities of three controlling class CMBS trusts with a carrying value of $40,290. The total par amounts of CMBS issued by the three CMBS
trusts was $921,654. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected losses or residual returns, the Company has concluded that it would not be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying
special-purpose entities. At June 30, 2009, the Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investment in these QSPEs totaled $40,290 which equals the book value of these investments
as of June 30, 2009.

The
financing structures that the Company offers to the borrowers on certain of its real estate loans involve the creation of entities that could be deemed VIEs and, therefore, could be
subject to FIN 46R. The Company's management has evaluated these entities and has concluded that none of such entities are VIEs that are subject to the consolidation rules of FIN 46R.

The
following is a summary of the Company's involvement with VIEs (excluding QSPEs) as of June 30, 2009:

Company
carrying
value
assets

Company
carrying
value
liabilities

Face value of
assets held
by the VIE

Face value of
liabilities issued
by the VIEConsolidated VIEsTotal real estate investments, net(1)

$
116,911

$
50,834

$
116,911

$
50,834Collateralized debt obligations





2,608,175


3,100,000


3,100,000$
116,911

$
2,659,009

$
3,216,911

$
3,150,834Unconsolidated VIEsCommercial mortgage-backed securities

$
40,290

$


$
921,654

$
921,654


---

9

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The
Company has determined that it is the non-transferor sponsor of one of the Company's non-investment grade CMBS investments, GS Mortgage Securities Trust
2007-GKKI, or the Trust. The Trust is a resecuritization of approximately $634,000 of commercial mortgage backed securities rated AA+ through BB structured in a QSPE. The Company purchased
a portion of the below investment securities, totaling approximately $27,300. The Company is the collateral administrator on the transaction and receives a total fee of 5.5 basis points on the par
value of the underlying collateral. As collateral administrator, the Company's on-going duty is to liquidate defaulted securities, for the Trust if very specific triggers have been
reached. The Company can be removed as collateral administrator, for cause only, with the vote of 662/3% of the certificate holders. There are no liquidity facilities or financing
agreements associated with the Trust. The Company has no on-going financial obligations, including advancing, funding, or purchasing collateral in the Trust. The Company's maximum exposure
to the QSPE is limited to its investment in the bonds purchased.

Real Estate and CTL Investments

The Company records acquired real estate and CTL investments at cost. Costs directly related to the acquisition of such investments are
expensed as incurred. Certain improvements are capitalized when they are determined to increase the useful life of the building. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the capitalized item or 40 years for buildings, five to ten years for building equipment and fixtures, and the lesser of the useful life or the
remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests. Maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.

In
leasing office space, the Company may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for tenant allowances, the Company determines whether the allowance
represents funding for the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership, for accounting purposes, of such improvements. If the Company is considered the owner of the leasehold
improvements for
accounting purposes, the Company capitalizes the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciates it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the lease term. If the tenant
allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event the Company is not considered the owner of the improvements for accounting purposes, the
allowance is considered to be a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue. Factors considered during this evaluation usually include (i) who holds
legal title to the improvements, (ii) evidentiary requirements concerning the spending of the tenant allowance, and (iii) other controlling rights provided by the lease agreement
(e.g. unilateral control of the tenant space during the build-out process.) Determination of the accounting for a tenant allowance is made on a case-by-case
basis, considering the facts and circumstances of the individual tenant lease.

Results
of operations of properties acquired are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

The
Company also reviews the recoverability of the property's carrying value when circumstances indicate a possible impairment of the value of a property. The review of recoverability is
based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property's use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as
expected future

10

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

operating
income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If management determines impairment exists due to the
inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property for properties to be held
and used and for assets held for sale, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the fair value less estimated cost to dispose of assets held for sale. These
assessments are recorded as an impairment loss in the consolidated statement of operations in the period the determination is made.

In
accordance with FASB Statement No. 141 (revised) "Business Combinations," or SFAS No. 141(R), the Company allocates the purchase price of real estate to land, building,
improvements and intangibles, such as the value of above-, below- and at-market leases, and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. The Company depreciates the
amount allocated to building and other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years. The values of the above-, and below-market leases are
amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease.
The value associated with in-place leases are amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of the lease renewal, and its estimated term. If a tenant vacates
its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off. The tenant
improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date. The
Company assesses fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and
capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends and market/economic
conditions that may affect the property.

Leasehold Interests

Leasehold interest assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the fair value of management's estimate of the
net present value of cash flows expected to be paid and earned from the subleases over the non-cancelable lease terms and any payments received in consideration for assuming the leasehold
interests. Factors used in determining the net present value of cash flows include contractual rental amounts, costs of tenant improvements, costs of capital expenditures and amounts due under the
corresponding operating lease assumed. Amounts allocated to leasehold interests, based on their respective fair values, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease
term.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting since it exercises
significant influence, but does not unilaterally control the entities and is not considered to be the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R. In the joint ventures, the rights of the other investors
are protective and participating. Unless the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, these rights preclude it from consolidating the investments. The investments

11

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

are
recorded initially at cost as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently are adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions. Any difference
between the carrying amount of the investments on the Company's balance sheet and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized as an adjustment to equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated
joint ventures over the lesser of the joint venture term or 40 years. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to the Company. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had investments of $102,669 and $93,919 in unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash at June 30, 2009 consists of $49,361 on deposit with the trustee of the Company's collateralized debt
obligations, or CDOs, representing the proceeds of repayments from loans serving as collateral in the Company's CDOs, which will be used to fund investments to replace those trust assets which are
repaid or sold by the trust and interest payments received by the trustee on investments that serve as collateral for the Company's CDOs, which are remitted to the Company on a quarterly basis. The
remaining balance consists of $71,791 held as collateral for letters of credit, $2,520 of interest reserves held on behalf of borrowers and $80,558, which includes $3,924 related to assets held for
sale, which represents amounts escrowed pursuant to mortgage agreements securing the Company's real estate investments and CTL investments for insurance, taxes, repairs and maintenance, tenant
improvements, interest, and debt service and amounts held as collateral under security and pledge agreements relating to leasehold interests.

Assets Held for Sale



Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan
origination fees, discounts, repayments, sales of partial interests in loans, and unfunded commitments unless such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. Loans held for sale are carried at the
lower of cost or market value using available market information obtained through consultation with dealers or other originators of such investments. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the Company had loans and other lending investments held for sale of $102,441 and $0, respectively. The Company recorded impairment charges of $41,951 and
$126,379 related to the mark-to-market of the loans designated as held for sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.



In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, or SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," real estate investments or CTL investments to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value, less cost to sell. Once an asset is
classified as held for sale, depreciation expense is no longer recorded and current and prior periods are

12

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

reclassified
as Discontinued Operations. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the company had real estate investments held for sale of $164,510 and $192,780, respectively. The
Company recorded impairment charges of $13,295 and $19,068 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, related to real estate investments classified as held for sale.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

The Company designates its CMBS investments pursuant to FASB Statement No. 115, or SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," on the date of acquisition of the investment. Held to maturity investments are stated at cost plus any premiums or discounts which are amortized through the
consolidated statements of operations using the level yield method. CMBS securities that the Company does not hold for the purpose of selling in the near-term but may dispose of prior to
maturity, are designated as available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value with the net unrealized gains or losses recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity. Unrealized losses on securities that, in the judgment of management, are other than temporary are charged against earnings as a loss on the
consolidated statements of operations. The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the
timing of loss realization. In addition, it is possible that the Company in the future, may need to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment notwithstanding its continued
determination that no credit loss has occurred and estimated cash flows remain stable, due to the duration that the estimated fair value remains below book value. In November 2007, subsequent to
financing the Company's CMBS investments in its CDOs, the Company redesignated all of its available-for-sale CMBS investments with a book value of approximately $43,600 to held
to maturity. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the unrealized loss on the
redesignated CMBS investments included in other comprehensive income (loss) was $4,701 and $4,986, respectively.

The
Company accounts for CMBS (other than those of high credit quality or sufficiently collateralized to ensure that the possibility of credit loss is remote) under Emerging Issues Task
Force 99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets," or EITF 99-20.
Accordingly, on a quarterly basis, when significant changes in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously estimated occur due to actual prepayment and credit loss experience, and the present
value of the revised cash flow is less than the present value previously estimated, an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred. The security is written down
to fair value with the resulting charge against earnings and a new cost basis is established. The Company calculates a revised yield based on the current amortized cost of the investment (including
any other-than-temporary impairments recognized to date) and the revised yield is then applied prospectively to recognize interest income.

In
January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1. This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to align it with the impairment
guidance within SFAS 115 by removing from EITF 99-20 the requirement to place exclusive reliance on market participants' assumptions about future cash flows when evaluating
an asset for other-than-temporary impairment. The standard now requires that

13

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

assumptions
about future cash flows consider reasonable management judgment about the probability that the holder of an asset will be unable to collect all amounts due.

The
Company determines the fair value of CMBS based on the types of securities in which the Company has invested. For liquid, investment-grade securities, the Company consults with
dealers of such securities to periodically obtain updated market pricing for the same or similar instruments. For non-investment grade securities, the Company actively monitors the
performance of the underlying properties and loans and updates the Company's pricing model to reflect changes in projected cash flows. The value of the securities is derived by applying discount rates
to such cash flows based on current market yields. The yields employed are obtained from the Company's own experience in the market, advice from dealers when available, and/or information obtained in
consultation with other investors in similar instruments. Because fair value estimates, when available, may vary to some degree, the Company must make certain judgments and assumptions about the
appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values for financial reporting purposes. Different judgments and assumptions could result in materially different presentations of value.

Pledged Government Securities

The Company maintains a portfolio of treasury securities that are pledged to provide principal and interest payments for mortgage debt
previously collateralized by properties in its real estate portfolio. The Company does not intend to sell the securities and believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the full amortized
cost basis of the securities over their remaining life. These securities had a carrying value of $99,447, a fair value of $100,361 and unrealized gains of $914 at June 30, 2009, and have
maturities that extend through November 2013.

Tenant and Other Receivables

Tenant and other receivables are primarily derived from the rental income that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its
lease, which is recorded on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since many leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis
accounting requires the Company to record a receivable, and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables that will only be received if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the
expiration of the initial term of the lease. Tenant and other receivables also include receivables related to tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable
expenses that are recognized as revenue in the period in which the related expenses are incurred.

Tenant
and other receivables are recorded net of the allowances for doubtful accounts, which as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were $6,221 and $6,361,
respectively. The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent, tenant reimbursements and unbilled rent receivables and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's
payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the
event that the collectability of a receivable is in doubt, the Company increases the allowance for doubtful accounts or records a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated
statements of operations.

14

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Intangible Assets

The Company follows the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired
properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings and improvements on an as-if vacant basis.
The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from
appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analyses and other methods. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above- and below-market lease rates and
the value of in-place leases.

Above-market,
below-market and in-place lease values for properties acquired are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and management's estimate of the fair market lease rate for
each such in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction
of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial
term and any fixed-rate renewal periods in the respective leases.

The
aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted
to market rental rates and the property valued as-if vacant. Factors considered by management in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying
costs during the expected lease-up period for each property taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management
includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the anticipated lease-up period, which is expected to average six
months. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

The
value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which range primarily from one to 22 years. In no event does the
amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is
charged to expense.

15

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, management utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection
with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. Management also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition
due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.

Intangible
assets and acquired lease obligations consist of the following:

June 30,
2009

December 31,
2008Intangible assets:In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $47,945 and $22,283

$
391,371

$
428,977Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $16,806 and $8,865


92,618


110,489Amounts related to assets held for sale, net of accumulated amortization of $693 and $388


(3,977
)

(3,254
)Total intangible assets

$
480,012

$
536,212Intangible liabilities:Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $102,935 and $53,597

$
818,144

$
847,528Amounts related to assets held for sale, net of accumulated amortization of $441 and $228


(2,132
)

(1,177
)Total intangible liabilities

$
816,012

$
846,351


Deferred Costs

Deferred costs include deferred financing costs that represent commitment fees, legal and other third party costs associated with
obtaining commitments for financing which result in a closing of such financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective agreements and the amortization is reflected as interest
expense. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are
expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close. Deferred costs also consist of fees and direct costs incurred to originate new investments and are amortized using
the effective yield method over the related term of the investment.

The
Company has deferred certain expenditures related to the leasing of certain properties. Direct costs of leasing, including internally capitalized payroll costs associated with
leasing activities, are deferred and amortized over the terms of the underlying leases.

16

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Other Assets

The Company makes payments for certain expenses such as insurance and property taxes in advance of the period in which it receives the
benefit. These payments are classified as other assets and amortized over the respective period of benefit relating to the contractual arrangement. The Company also escrows deposits related to pending
acquisitions and financing arrangements, as required by a seller or lender, respectively. Costs prepaid in connection with securing financing for a property are reclassified into deferred financing
costs at the time the transaction is completed.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

FASB Statement No. 157, or SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which among other things requires additional
disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in
measuring financial instruments at fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, fair values are not necessarily indicative of
the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from
actively quoted prices, generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and will require a lesser degree of judgment to be utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial
instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have less, or no, pricing observability and will require a higher degree of judgment to be utilized in measuring fair value. Pricing
observability is generally affected by such items as the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established, the characteristics specific to
the transaction and overall market conditions. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair value amounts.

SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date, or an exit price. The level of pricing observability generally correlates to the degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments. The less judgment
utilized in measuring fair value financial instruments such as with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets
generally have more pricing observability. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted have less observability and are measured at fair value using valuation models that require more
judgment. Impacted by a number of factors, pricing observability is generally affected by such items as the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not
yet established, the characteristics specific to the transaction and overall market conditions.

The
three broad levels defined by the SFAS No. 157 hierarchy are:



17

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



For
a further discussion regarding the measurement of financial instruments see Note 13, "Fair Value of Financial Instruments."

Revenue Recognition



Rental income from leases is recognized on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are contractually due. Certain
lease agreements also contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse the Company for real estate taxes, common area maintenance costs and the amortized cost of capital expenditures with
interest. Such amounts are included in both revenues and operating expenses when the Company is the primary obligor for these expenses and assumes the risks and rewards of a principal under these
arrangements. Under leases where the tenant pays these expenses directly, such amounts are not included in revenues or expenses.

Deferred
revenue represents rental revenue and management fees received prior to the date earned. Deferred revenue also includes rental payments received in excess of rental revenues
recognized as a result of straight-line basis accounting.

Other
income includes fees paid by tenants to terminate their leases, which are recognized when fees due are determinable, no further actions or services are required to be performed by
the Company, and collectability is reasonably assured. In the event of early termination, the unrecoverable net book values of the assets or liabilities related to the terminated lease are recognized
as depreciation and amortization expense in the period of termination.

The
Company recognizes sales of real estate properties only upon closing, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate." Payments received from purchasers
prior to closing are recorded as deposits. Profit on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the sale price is reasonably assured and the
Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale. Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of profit recognition on sale of real estate
under SFAS No. 66.

18

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



Interest income on debt investments is recognized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method and recognized on
the accrual basis. Fees received in connection with loan commitments are deferred until the loan is funded and are then recognized over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
Anticipated exit fees, whose collection is expected, are also recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield. Fees on commitments that expire unused are recognized at expiration. Fees
received in exchange for the credit enhancement of another lender, either subordinate or senior to the Company, in the form of a guarantee are recognized over the term of that guarantee using the
straight-line method.

Income
recognition is generally suspended for debt investments at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in the opinion of management, a full
recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed.

The
Company designates loans as non-performing at such time as: (1) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or (2) the loan has a maturity default. All
non-performing loans are placed on non-accrual status and income is recognized only upon actual cash receipt. At June 30, 2009, the Company had eight first mortgage
loans with an aggregate carrying value of $123,951, one mezzanine loan with a carrying value of $0, one second lien loan with a carrying value of $0 and one third lien loan with a carrying value of
$0, which were classified as non-performing
loans. At December 31, 2008, the Company had three first mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $164,809, one second lien loan with a carrying value of $0 and one third lien loan
with a carrying value of $0, which were classified as non-performing loans.

The
Company classifies loans as sub-performing if they are not performing in material accordance with their terms, but they do not qualify as non-performing
loans. The specific facts and circumstances of these loans may cause them to develop into non-performing loans should certain events occur in the normal passage of time, which the Company
considers to be 90 days from the measurement date. At June 30, 2009, 13 first mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $422,434 and six mezzanine loans with a carrying value of
$51,985 were classified as sub-performing. At December, 2008, five first mortgage loans with a total carrying value of $216,597 were classified as sub-performing.

Reserve for Possible Loan Losses

Specific valuation allowances are established for possible loan losses on loans in instances where it is deemed possible that the
Company may be unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. The Company considers the estimated value of the collateral securing the
loan, and compares it to the carrying value of the loan. The estimated value of the collateral is determined by selecting the most appropriate valuation methodology, or methodologies, among several
generally available and accepted in the commercial real estate industry. The determination of the most appropriate valuation methodology is based on the key characteristics of the collateral type,
collateral location, quality and prospects of the sponsor, the amount and status of any senior debt, and other factors. These methodologies include the evaluation of operating cash flow from the
property during the projected holding period, and the estimated sales value of the collateral

19

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

computed
by applying an expected capitalization rate to the stabilized net operating income of the specific property, less selling costs, all of which are discounted at market discount rates. Because
the determination of estimated value is based upon projections of future economic events, which are inherently subjective, amounts ultimately realized from loans and investments may differ materially
from the carrying value at the balance sheet date.

If,
upon completion of the valuation, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created
with a corresponding charge to the provision for possible loan losses. The allowance for each loan is maintained at a level the Company believes is adequate to absorb possible losses. Impairment
losses are recognized as a direct write-down of the loan investment with a corresponding charge-off to the allowance. As of June 30, 2009, the Company incurred
charge-offs totaling $31,771 relating to realized losses on seven loans. The Company maintained a reserve for possible loan losses
of $277,404 against 19 separate investments with a carrying value of $570,946 as of June 30, 2009 and a reserve for possible loan losses of $88,992 against 13 separate investments with a
carrying value of $424,177 as of December 31, 2008.

Rent Expense

Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are due. Accounts payable and accrued
expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 includes an accrual for rental expense recognized in excess of amounts due at that time.
Rent expense related to leasehold interests is included in property operating expenses, and rent expense related to office rentals is included in marketing, general and administrative expense.

Stock Based Compensation Plans

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, described more fully in Note 14. The Company accounts for this plan using the
fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment, a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."

The
Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's plan has characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in the Company's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide
a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company's stock options.

Prior
to amending and restating the management agreement in October 2008, which was subsequently terminated in April 2009, employees of the Manager who provided services to the Company
pursuant to the then-existing management agreement were characterized as its co-leased employees. Stock option awards granted to such persons under our 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan were valued at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which value was amortized over the option vesting period. The amended management agreement that was executed in
October 2008 resulted in the re-characterization of such employees of the Manager, and they were no longer

20

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

classified
as the Company's co-leased employees. Consequently, the Company determined fair value of the stock options granted to such persons using a mark-to-market
model, until April 2009 when the Company completed the internalization of management through the direct acquisition of the Manager. Stock option awards were re-valued at the date of the
internalization and will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the award for employees that remained with the Manager.

Compensation
cost for stock options, if any, is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the award. The Company's policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the
quoted closing market price of its stock on the business day preceding the grant date. Awards of stock or restricted stock are expensed as compensation over the benefit period.

The
fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant for options issued to employees, and quarterly awards to non-employees, using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2009 and 2008.

2009

2008Dividend yield


14.0%


9.0%Expected life of option


5.0 years


6.0 yearsRisk-free interest rate


1.72%


2.97%Expected stock price volatility


90.0%


67.0%


Incentive Distribution (Class B Limited Partner Interest)

Prior to the internalization, the Class B limited partner interests were entitled to receive an incentive return equal to 25% of
the amount by which funds from operations, or FFO, plus certain accounting gains (as defined in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership) exceed the product of the Company's weighted
average stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5% (divided by four to adjust for quarterly calculations). The Company recorded any
distributions on the Class B limited partner interests as an incentive distribution expense in the period when earned and when payment of such amounts became probable and reasonably estimable
in accordance with the partnership agreement. These cash distributions reduced the amount of cash available for distribution to the common unit holders in the Operating Partnership and to the
Company's common stockholders. In October 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Class B limited partners to waive the incentive distribution that would have otherwise been
earned for the period July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and provide that the starting January 1, 2009, the incentive distribution could be paid, at the Company's option, in
cash or shares of common stock. In December 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL Green
transferred to the Company, 1.9 million shares of the Company's common stock, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that the holders of the Class B limited partner interests
may have had to the Operating Partnership, and the Operating Partnership may have to the holders, each in accordance with the amended operating partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, in
respect of the recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of the 2008 calendar year. No incentive distribution was earned for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively. The

21

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Company
incurred approximately $2,604 and $5,100 with respect to incentive distributions on such Class B limited partner interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. In April 2009, the Company completed the internalization of management through the direct acquisition of the Manager. Accordingly, beginning in May 2009, management and incentive fees
payable by the Company to the Manager ceased, and the Company now owns all of the Class B limited partner interests (which have been cancelled) and all of the interests in the Manager.

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company uses a variety of commonly used derivative instruments that are considered conventional,
or "plain vanilla" derivatives, including interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors, to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. Each of the Company's CDOs maintain a minimum amount of allowable
unhedged interest rate risk. The Company requires that hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. This effectiveness is
essential for qualifying for hedge accounting. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract. The Company expressly
prohibits the use of unconventional derivative instruments and using derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, the Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with
major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.

To
determine the fair value of derivative instruments, the Company uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet
date. For the majority of financial instruments including most derivatives, long-term investments and long-term debt, standard market conventions and techniques such as
discounted cash flow analysis, option-pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost are used to determine fair value. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of
value, and such value may never actually be realized.

In
the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes and limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures
including the use of derivatives. To address exposure to interest rates, the Company uses derivatives primarily to hedge the cash flow variability caused by interest rate fluctuations in relation to
its liabilities. Each of the Company's CDOs maintain a minimum amount of allowable unhedged interest rate risk. The 2005 CDO permits 20% of the net outstanding principal balance to be unhedged and the
2006 CDO and the 2007 CDO permit 5% of the net outstanding principal balance.

FASB
Statement No. 133, or SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended by FASB No. 149, requires the Company to
recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the
hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other
comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 133 may
increase or decrease reported net income and stockholders'

22

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

equity
prospectively, depending on future levels of LIBOR, swap spreads and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items, but will have no effect on cash flows,
provided the contract is carried through to full term.

All
hedges held by the Company are deemed effective based upon the hedging objectives established by the Company's corporate policy governing interest rate risk management. The effect of
the Company's derivative instruments on its financial statements is discussed more fully in Note 17.

Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, beginning with its
taxable year ended December 31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its
ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that the Company distributes to its stockholders. If the
Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for
treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under
certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company's net income and net cash available for distributions to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it
will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and the Company intends to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that it will qualify as a REIT for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes. The Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries individually referred to as a TRS, are subject to U.S. federal, state
and local taxes.

For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded $134 and $2,401 and $0 and $11 of income tax expense, respectively. Included in tax expense for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 is $2,100 of state income taxes on the gain of extinguishment of debt of $107,229. Under
federal tax law, the Company is allowed to defer this gain until 2014, however as not all states follow this federal rule. The Company has recorded a tax provision equal to the estimated state tax
exposure.

Earnings Per Share

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share, or EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, as long as their inclusion would not be anti-dilutive.

23

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments, debt
investments, derivative instruments, and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The Company performs
ongoing analysis of credit risk concentrations in the Company's loan and other lending investment portfolio by evaluating exposure to various markets, underlying property types, investment structure,
term, sponsors, tenants and other credit metrics.

Four
investments accounted for approximately 20.0% of the total carrying value of the Company's debt investments as of June 30, 2009 compared to five investments which accounted
for more than 20% of the total carrying value of the Company's debt investments as of December 31, 2008. Six investments accounted for approximately 17.5% and 17.0% of the revenue earned on the
Company's loan and other lending investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to six and eight investments which accounted for approximately 16.6% and 23.3% of the
revenue earned on the Company's loan and other lending investments for the three and six months ended June 20, 2008, respectively. The largest sponsor accounted for approximately 5.9% and 5.5%
of the revenue earned on the Company's loan and other lending investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to approximately 4.5% and 4.3% of the revenue
earned on the Company's loan and other lending investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

Additionally,
two tenants, Bank of America and Wachovia Bank, accounted for approximately 44.4% and 15.9% of the Company's rental revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, and approximately 42.7% and 15.6% of the Company's rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised), "Business Combinations," or SFAS No. 141(R), which
attempts to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its
effects. This Statement replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the acquisition method of
accounting (which Statement No. 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement also
retains the guidance in SFAS No. 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in SFAS No. 141(R) are:
(1) acquisition and restructuring costs would be now expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date
the deal is announced; (3) contingent consideration arising from contractual and non contractual contingencies that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition

24

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

threshold
will be measured and recognized as an asset or liability at fair value at the acquisition date using a probability-weighted discounted cash flows model, with subsequent changes in fair value
reflected in earnings while non contractual contingencies that do not meet the more-likely-than-not criteria will continue to be recognized when they are probable
and reasonably estimable; and (4) acquirer records 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the minority interest portion and goodwill which is recorded
as if a 100% interest was acquired. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009. The Company recorded an expense of $2,184 and $5,010 in connection with costs incurred with
the internalization of the management and acquisition of the Manager for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, "Non-Controlling Interest on Consolidated Financial Statements" an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin, or
ARB No. 51. This Statement amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. Additionally, this Statement requires that consolidated net income include the amount attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. The Company adopted SFAS
No. 160 on January 1, 2009. As required, SFAS No. 160 was applied retrospectively for all periods presented.

In
February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 140-3, or FSP No. 140-3, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions." FSP No. 140-3 provides guidance on the accounting for a purchase of a financial asset from a counterparty and contemporaneous financing of the acquisition through
repurchase agreements with the same counterparty. Under this guidance, the purchase and related financing are linked, unless all of the following conditions are met at the inception of the
transaction: (1) the purchase and corresponding financing are not contractually contingent; (2) the repurchase financing provides recourse; (3) the financial asset and repurchase
financing are readily obtainable in the marketplace and are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity of financial asset and repurchase are not coterminous. A linked transaction would
require a determination under FAS No. 140 to conclude if the transaction meets the requirements for sale accounting. If the linked transaction does not meet sale accounting requirements, the
net investment in the linked transaction is to be recorded as a derivative with the corresponding change in fair value of the derivative being recorded through earnings. The value of the derivative
would reflect changes in the value of the underlying debt investments and changes in the value of the underlying credit provided by the counterparty. The Company currently presents these transactions
gross, with the acquisition of the financial assets in total assets and the related repurchase agreements as financing in total liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and the interest income
earned on the debt investments and interest expense incurred on the repurchase obligations are reported gross on the consolidated income statements. As SFAS 140-3 is to be applied
prospectively and as the Company has not acquired and simultaneously financed any transactions with the same counterparty subsequent to January 1, 2009, SFAS 140-3 did not
have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

25

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-1, "Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13" ("FSP 157-1") and FSP 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157"
("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 provides a one-year deferral of the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. These non-financial items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and
non-financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and was adopted by the Company, as it applies to its financial instruments, effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to financial
instruments did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to its
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, or SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early adoption encouraged. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of SFAS no. 161 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2008, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP No. FAS 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets." FSP FAS
No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing a renewal or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under FASB Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," or SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted FSP FAS
No. 142-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS no. 142-3 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active", or FSP 157-3, which
clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and provides an illustrative example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that
financial asset is not active. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 157-3 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

26

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In
December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 ("FSP FAS 140-4 and
FIN 46(R)-8"), "Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities" which increases disclosure requirements
for public companies and is effective for reporting periods that end after December 15, 2008. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends SFAS No. 140,
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" to require public entities to provide additional disclosures about a transferor's continuing involvement
with transferred financial assets. It also amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" to require public enterprises, including
sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. The Company has adopted FSP
FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8. Adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 did not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.

In
January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1. This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to align it with the impairment
guidance within SFAS 115 by removing from EITF 99-20 the requirement to place exclusive reliance on market participants' assumptions about future cash flows when evaluating
an asset for other-than-temporary impairment. The standard now requires that assumptions about future cash flows consider reasonable management judgment about the probability
that the holder of an asset will be unable to collect all amounts due. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
December 15, 2008. The Company has adopted EITF 99-20-1 and it did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" (FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP requires that the fair value disclosures required by SFAS 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" be
included for interim reporting periods. The Company has adopted this new accounting standard effective April 1, 2009, and has made the required disclosures in its June 30, 2009
consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). This FSP amends the impairment guidance relating to certain debt
securities and will require a company to assess the likelihood of selling the security prior to recovering its cost
basis. Additionally, when a company meets the criteria for impairment, the impairment charges related to credit losses would be recognized in earnings, while non-credit losses would be
reflected in other comprehensive income. The Company has adopted this standard effective April 1, 2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 did not
have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on determining when the trading volume
and activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased,

27

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

which
may indicate an inactive market, and on measuring the fair value of an asset or liability in inactive markets. The Company has adopted this new accounting standard effective April 1,
2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 141R-1, "Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies" (FSP FAS 141R-1). FSP FAS 141R-1 requires that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability
assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of the asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. The Company
adopted this new accounting standard on January 1, 2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 140R-1 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events." This standard incorporates into authoritative accounting literature certain guidance that already existed within
generally accepted auditing standards, with the requirements concerning recognition and disclosure of subsequent events remaining essentially unchanged. This guidance addresses events which occur
after the balance sheet date but before the issuance of financial statements. Under SFAS No.165, as under previous practice, an entity must record the effects of subsequent events that provide
evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and must disclose but not record the effects of subsequent events which provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the
balance sheet date. This standard added an additional required disclosure relative to the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial
statements were issued. The Company has adopted this standard effective beginning April 1, 2009. The additional disclosures required by this standard are included in Note 1.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assetsan Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140," amending the guidance on
transfers of financial assets to, among other things, eliminate the qualifying special-purpose entity concept,
include a new unit of account definition that must be met for transfers of portions of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting, clarify and change the derecognition criteria for a transfer
to be accounted for as a sale, and require significant additional disclosure. This standard is effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)," which revised the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities. The
modifications include the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and changes to when it
is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. This standard is effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162," and approved the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The Codification does not change current
GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature

28

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

related
to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered
non-authoritative. Codification is effective July 1, 2009 and will require future references to authoritative GAAP to coincide with the appropriate section of the Codification.
Accordingly, this standard will not have an impact the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

29

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments

The aggregate carrying values, allocated by product type and weighted-average coupons, of the Company's loan, and other lending investments and CMBS investments as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, including loans held for sale, were as follows:

Carrying Value(1)

Allocation by
Investment
Type

Fixed Rate:
Average Yield(2)

Floating Rate:
Average Spread over
LIBOR(3)2009

2008

2009

2008

2009

2008

2009

2008Whole loans, floating rate

$
1,024,838

$
1,222,991


57.6
%

55.3
%







428 bps


418 bpsWhole loans, fixed rate


145,091


189,946


8.1
%

8.6
%

7.01
%

7.17
%




Subordinate interests in whole loans, floating rate


79,239


80,608


4.5
%

3.6
%







266 bps


564 bpsSubordinate interests in whole loans, fixed rate


44,689


63,179


2.5
%

2.9
%

7.14
%

9.22
%




Mezzanine loans, floating rate


271,066


396,190


15.2
%

17.9
%







619 bps


654 bpsMezzanine loans, fixed rate


202,101


248,558


11.4
%

11.2
%

9.27
%

10.21
%




Preferred equity, fixed rate


12,143


12,001


0.7
%

0.5
%

7.20
%

10.22
%




Subtotal/Weighted average


1,779,167


2,213,473


100.0
%

100.0
%

8.16
%

8.96
%

457 bps


480 bpsCMBS, floating rate


70,911


70,893


7.5
%

8.1
%







315 bps


945 bpsCMBS, fixed rate


876,752


799,080


92.5
%

91.9
%

6.31
%

6.26
%




Subtotal/Weighted average


947,663


869,973


100.0
%

100.0
%

6.31
%

6.26
%

315bps


945 bpsTotal

$
2,726,830

$
3,083,446


100.0
%

100.0
%

6.89
%

7.32
%

450 bps


498 bps


---

29

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

As of June 30, 2009, the Company's loans and other lending investments, excluding CMBS investments, had the following maturity
characteristics:

Year of Maturity

Number of
Investments
Maturing

Current
Carrying Value
(In thousands)

% of
Total2009 (July 1December 31)(1)


31

$
682,146


38.3
%2010


17


550,061


30.9
%2011


7


209,131


11.8
%2012


2


63,243


3.6
%2013








Thereafter


12


274,586


15.4
%Total


69

$
1,779,167


100.0
%Weighted average maturity(2)





1.7 years


---

For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company's investment income from loans and other lending investments and CMBS investments, including loans held for
sale, was generated by the following investment types:

Three months ended
June 30, 2009

Three months ended
June 30, 2008Investment Type

Investment
Income

% of
Total

Investment
Income

% of
TotalWhole loans

$
19,704


43.9
%
$
29,831


47.3
%Subordinate interests in whole loans


1,370


3.1
%

2,683


4.3
%Mezzanine loans


9,954


22.2
%

16,354


26.0
%Preferred equity


285


0.6
%

313


0.5
%CMBS


13,556


30.2
%

13,822


21.9
%Total

$
44,869


100.0
%
$
63,003


100.0
%


30

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)



Six months ended
June 30, 2009

Six months ended
June 30, 2008Investment Type

Investment
Income

% of
Total

Investment
Income

% of
TotalWhole loans

$
42,651


43.6
%
$
71,552


52.0
%Subordinate interests in whole loans


2,311


2.4
%

5,395


3.9
%Mezzanine loans


23,813


24.4
%

32,916


23.9
%Preferred equity


618


0.6
%

626


0.5
%CMBS


28,333


29.0
%

27,109


19.7
%Total

$
97,725


100.0
%
$
137,598


100.0
%


At
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company's loans and other lending investments, excluding CMBS investments, had the following geographic diversification:

June 30, 2009

December 31, 2008Region

Carrying
Value

% of
Total

Carrying
Value

% of
TotalNortheast

$
877,357


49.3
%
$
1,023,718


46.2
%West


439,436


24.7
%

626,180


28.3
%South


171,794


9.7
%

225,674


10.2
%Mid-Atlantic


122,897


6.9
%

121,515


5.5
%Southwest


90,867


5.1
%

107,735


4.9
%Midwest


22,258


1.3
%

22,358


1.0
%Various


54,558


3.1
%

86,293


3.9
%Total

$
1,779,167


100.0
%
$
2,213,473


100.0
%


31

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

At
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company's loans and other lending investments, excluding CMBS investments, by property type are as follows:

June 30, 2009

December 31, 2008Property Type

Carrying
Value

% of
Total

Carrying
Value

% of
TotalOffice

$
790,225


44.4
%
$
874,682


39.5
%Hotel


265,626


14.9
%

345,615


15.6
%Multifamily


233,615


13.1
%

272,950


12.4
%Land-commercial


184,138


10.4
%

209,572


9.5
%Retail


113,148


6.4
%

218,763


9.9
%Condominium


60,006


3.4
%

91,418


4.1
%Mixed-use


32,908


1.8
%

78,107


3.5
%Land-residential


39,236


2.2
%

65,973


3.0
%Industrial


51,068


2.9
%

47,229


2.1
%Other


9,197


0.5
%

9,164


0.4
%Total

$
1,779,167


100.0
%
$
2,213,473


100.0
%


The
Company recorded provisions for loan losses of $167,412 and $220,183 and $23,214 and $31,214 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively. These provisions represent increases in loan loss reserves based on management's estimates considering delinquencies, loss experience and collateral quality by individual asset or
category of asset.

For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred charge-offs of $31,771 related to realized losses on seven loan investments. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company incurred charge-offs totaling $17,519 related to two defaulted loans the Company foreclosed upon which had a carrying value totaling $31,760 and three
additional loans, two of which were sold at a loss and the other was a negotiated payoff below par.

Changes
in the reserve for possible loan losses were as follows:

Reserve for possible loan losses, December 31, 2007

$
8,658Additional provision for loan losses


97,853Charge-offs


(17,519
)Reserve for possible loan losses, December 31, 2008


88,992Additional provision for loan losses


220,183Charge-offs


(31,771
)Reserve for possible loan losses, June 30, 2009

$
277,404


32

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

The
following is a summary of the Company's CMBS investments at June 30, 2009:

Description

Number of
Securities

Face Value

Book Value

Gross
Unrealized
Gain

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Fair
ValueHeld to maturity:Floating rate CMBS


8

$
73,664

$
70,911

$


$
(40,656
)
$
30,255Fixed rate CMBS


84


1,002,923


876,752





(502,332
)

374,420Total


92

$
1,076,587

$
947,663

$


$
(542,988
)
$
404,675


The
following is a summary of the Company's CMBS investments at December 31, 2008:

Description

Number of
Securities

Face Value

Book Value

Gross
Unrealized
Gain

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Fair
ValueHeld to maturity:Floating rate CMBS


8

$
73,664

$
70,894

$


$
(33,596
)
$
37,298Fixed rate CMBS


66


835,578


799,079





(536,392
)

262,687Total


74

$
909,242

$
869,973

$


$
(569,988
)
$
299,985


33

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

As of June 30, 2009, the Company's CMBS investments had the following maturity characteristics:

Year of Maturity

Number of
Investments
Maturing

Current
Carrying
Value

Current
Market
Value

% of
Total
Carrying
Value

% of
Total
Market
Value(In thousands)

(In thousands)Under one year




$


$




%


%One to five years


8


94,317


51,319


10.0
%

12.7
%Five to ten years


82


846,659


352,190


89.3
%

87.0
%Thereafter


2


6,687


1,166


0.7
%

0.3
%Total


92

$
947,663

$
404,675


100.0
%

100.0
%


The
following is a summary of the underlying credit ratings of the Company's CMBS investments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (for split-rated securities, the higher
rating was used):

June 30, 2009

December 31, 2008Book Value

Percentage

Book Value

PercentageAAA

$
829,456


87.5
%
$
799,440


91.9
%AA+


13,511


1.4
%




0.0
%AA


59,752


6.3
%

26,689


3.4
%AA-


3,508


0.4
%




BBB-





0.0
%

13,229


1.5
%BB+





0.0
%

7,442


0.9
%BB


1,149


0.1
%

4,901


0.6
%BB-





0.0
%




B+


13,174


1.4
%

7,659


0.5
%B


5,042


0.5
%

4,309


0.5
%B-


4,477


0.5
%




CCC+


7,307


0.8
%




CCC


3,600


0.4
%

5,241


0.6
%CCC-


5,558


0.6
%




0.0
%Not rated


1,129


0.1
%

1,063


0.1
%Total

$
947,663


100.0
%
$
869,973


100.0
%


The Company evaluates CMBS investments to determine if there has been an other-than-temporary impairment. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of the Company's CMBS investments have an unrealized loss (the carrying value is in excess of the market value) which has existed longer than
twelve months. The Company's unrealized losses are primarily the result of market factors other than credit impairment which is generally indicated by significant change in estimated cash flows from
the cash flows previously estimated based on actual prepayments and credit loss experience. The carrying value of all CMBS investments is in excess of their fair value. Unrealized

34

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

3. Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

losses
can be caused by changes in interest rates, changes in credit spreads, realized losses in the underlying collateral, or general market conditions. The Company evaluates CMBS investments on a
quarterly basis and has determined that there have been no changes in expected cash flows. The Company's assessment of cash flows, which is supplemented by third-party research reports and dialogue
with market participants, combined with the Company's ability and intent to hold its CMBS investments to maturity, at which point the Company expects to recover book value, is the basis for its
conclusion that these investments are not other-than-temporarily impaired, despite the difference between the carrying value the and fair value. The Company attributes the
current difference between carrying value and market value to current market conditions. The Company has evaluated the securities and concluded that it does not intend to sell these securities and it
is not more likely than not it will be required to sell the securities before recovering the amortized costs basis. Accordingly, the Company does not believe any of the securities are
other-than-temporarily impaired.

In
connection with a preferred equity investment, which was repaid in October 2006, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the outstanding principal balance of the first mortgage loan
that is a financial obligation of the entity in which the Company has invested in the event of a borrower default under such loan. The loan matures in 2032. This guarantee is considered to be an
off-balance-sheet arrangement and will survive until the repayment of the first mortgage loan. As compensation, the Company received a credit enhancement fee of $125 from the borrower,
which is recognized as the fair value of the guarantee and has been recorded on its consolidated Balance Sheet as a liability. The liability is amortized over the life of the guarantee using the
straight-line method and
corresponding fee income will be recorded. The Company's maximum exposure under this guarantee is approximately $1,396 and $1,406 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Under the terms of the guarantee, the investment sponsor is required to reimburse the Company for the entire amount paid under the guarantee until the guarantee expires.

4. Acquisitions



On April 1, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of American Financial Realty Trust (NYSE: AFR), or American Financial,
in a transaction with a total value of approximately $3.3 billion,

35

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

4. Acquisitions (Continued)

including
the assumption of approximately $1.3 billion of American Financial's secured debt. The following table represents the cost of the acquired entity, and the consideration paid:

Cash consideration ($5.50 per share)

$
710,910Common stock consideration(1)


378,672Additional cash consideration equal to a portion of Gramercy's special common stock dividend declared(2)


31,271Purchase of minority interest in American Financial


14,497Merger costs


150,396Total consideration


1,285,746Repayment of American Financial's convertible notes and credit facilities at closing


707,650Assumption of American Financial's liabilities


1,316,004Total purchase price

$
3,309,400








On April 24, 2009, in connection with the Company's internalization of the Manager, the Company and the Operating Partnership
entered into a securities transfer agreement with SL Green OP, GKK Manager Member Corp. ("Manager Corp") and SL Green, pursuant to which (i) SL Green OP and Manager Corp agreed to transfer to
the Operating Partnership membership
interests in the Manager and (ii) SL Green OP agreed to transfer to the Operating Partnership its Class B limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership, in exchange for certain
de minimis cash consideration. The securities transfer agreement contains standard representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities.

Pro Forma

The following table summarizes, on an unaudited pro forma basis, the Company's combined results of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2009 as though the acquisitions of American Financial and GKK Manager were completed on January 1, 2008. The supplemental pro forma operating data is not necessarily
indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been

36

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

4. Acquisitions (Continued)

assuming
the transaction had been completed as set forth above, nor do they purport to represent the Company's results of operations for future periods. In addition, the following supplement pro forma
operating data does not present the sale of assets through June 30, 2009. The Company accounted for the acquisition of assets utilizing the purchase method of accounting.

2009

2008Pro forma revenues

$
322,012

$
363,259Pro forma net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(224,810
)
$
53,962Pro forma earnings per common sharebasis

$
(4.51
)
$
1.05Pro forma earnings per common sharediluted

$
(4.51
)
$
1.05Pro forma common sharesbasic


49,839


51,186Pro forma common sharesdiluted


49,839


51,388


5. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company sold or disposed of 12 and 35 properties, for net sales proceeds of $13,981 and $44,592, respectively. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold 20 properties for net sales proceeds of $44,546. The sales transactions resulted in gains totaling $1,595 and $2,169 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The sales transactions resulted in no gains or losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

In
January 2009, the Company sold to a third party its 49.75% TIC interest in 55 Corporate Drive, an office complex located in Bridgewater, New Jersey, at a gain of $215 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. As part of the transaction, the purchaser assumed the outstanding mortgage debt on the property.

37

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

5. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale (Continued)

In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, the Company classified 85 and 104 properties as held for sale as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The following table summarizes information for these properties:

June 30,
2009

December 31,
2008Assets held for sale:Real estate investments, at cost:Land

$
35,669

$
34,560Buildings and improvements


119,766


140,685Total real estate investments, at cost


155,435


175,245Less accumulated depreciation


(1,724
)

(4,629
)Real estate investments held for sale, net


153,711


170,616Accrued interest and receivables


2,031


10,656Loans and other lending investments, net


102,441


Acquired lease assets, net of accumulated amortization


3,977


Deferred costs


611


59Other assets


4,180


11,449Total assets held for sale:

$
266,951

$
192,780Liabilities related to assets held for sale:Mortgages payable

$
52,601

$
104,262Accrued expenses


4,645


4,628Deferred revenue


8,282


1,405Below market lease liabilities, net of accumulated amortization


2,132


Other liabilities


24


248Total liabilities related to assets held for sale


67,684


110,543Net assets held for sale

$
199,267

$
82,237


38

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

5. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale (Continued)

The
following operating results of the assets held for sale as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the assets sold, are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented:

Three months ended
June 30,

Six months ended
June 30,2009

2008

2009

2008Operating results:Revenues

$
6,429

$
14,866

$
13,489

$
14,866Operating expenses


(5,042
)

(8,217
)

(11,021
)

(8,217
)Impairments


(13,295
)




(19,068
)

Interest expense


(482
)

(3,916
)

(1,259
)

(3,916
)Depreciation and amortization


(336
)

(2,266
)

(1,015
)

(2,266
)Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint venture


(110
)

(343
)

(474
)

(700
)Net income (loss) from operations


(12,836
)

124


(19,348
)

(233
)Yield maintenance fees


(2
)




(92
)

Net gains from disposals


7,912





8,485


Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

$
(4,926
)
$
124

$
(10,955
)
$
(233
)


Discontinued
operations have not been segregated in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

6. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures



The Company owns a 25% interest in an equity owner and a fee interest in 200 Franklin Square Drive, a 200,000 square foot building
located in Somerset, New Jersey which is 100% net leased to Philips Holdings, USA Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Phillips Electronics through December 2021. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $1,129 and $2,142, respectively. The Company recorded its pro rata share of net income of the joint venture of $29 and $59 and $5 and
$36 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.



In November 2005, the Company closed on the purchase of a 50% interest in an office building in Pasadena, CA. The Company also acquired
an interest in certain related assets as part of the transaction. The 345,000 square foot office property, which was net leased to Bank of America through September 2015, assuming the exercise of
options, and related collateral were acquired for $52,000 plus closing costs, using a non-recourse, $50,000, ten-year fixed-rate first mortgage loan. The Company
recorded its pro rata share of net loss of the joint venture of $110 and $343 and $474 and $700 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, within discontinued
operations. The Company sold its 50% interest in April 2009 for a gain of $6,317.

39

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

6. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (Continued)



In April 2007, the Company purchased for $103,200 a 45% Tenant-In-Common, or TIC, interest to acquire the fee
interest in a parcel of land located at 2 Herald Square, located along 34th Street in New York, New York. The acquisition was financed with a $86,063 ten-year fixed rate mortgage
loan. The property is subject to a long-term ground lease with an unaffiliated third party for a term of 70 years. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary
of SL Green. The TIC interests are pari-passu. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had
a carrying value of $28,712 and $26,118, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded its pro rata share of net income of $1,247 and $2,513 and
$1,250 and $2,752, respectively.



In July 2007, the Company purchased for $144,240 an investment in a 45% TIC interest to acquire a 79% fee interest and 21% leasehold
interest in the fee position in a parcel of land located at 885 Third Avenue, on which is situated The Lipstick Building. The transaction was financed with a $120,443 ten-year
fixed-rate mortgage loan. The property is subject to a 70-year leasehold ground lease with an unaffiliated third party. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SL Green. The TIC interests are pari-passu. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $41,402 and $37,070 respectively.
The Company recorded its pro rata share of net income of $1,497 and $3,016 and $1,408 and $3,340 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.



The Company, through its acquisition of American Financial on April 1, 2008, obtained an interest in a joint venture with UBS.
The joint venture, as of June 30, 2009, owns and manages 72 bank branches totaling approximately 361,000 square feet. These branches are fully occupied, on a triple-net basis, by
Citizens Bank, N.A. and Charter One Bank, N.A., two bank subsidiaries of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. The investment had a carrying value of $8,629 and $10,495 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company recorded its pro rata share of net loss of $675 and $1,316 and $729 and $729 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.



In April 2008, the Company acquired via a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, a 40% interest in the Whiteface Lodge, a
hotel and condominium located in Lake Placid, New York. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $23,120 and $22,161, respectively. The Company
recorded its pro rata share of net loss of $126 and $85 and $205 and $205 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

40

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

7. Collateralized Debt Obligations

During 2005, the Company issued approximately $1,000,000 of CDO bonds through two indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2005-1 Ltd., or the 2005 Issuer, and
Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2005-1 LLC, or the 2005 Co-Issuer. At issuance, the CDO consisted of $810,500 of investment grade notes, $84,500 of non-investment
grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2005 Issuer and the 2005 Co-Issuer, and $105,000 of preferred shares, which were issued by the 2005 Issuer. The investment grade notes
were issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.49%. The Company incurred approximately $11,957 of costs related to Gramercy Real Estate CDO
2005-1, which are amortized on a level- yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

During
2006 the Company issued approximately $1,000,000 of CDO bonds through two newly-formed indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2006-1 Ltd., or the 2006
Issuer, and Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2006-1 LLC, or the 2006 Co-Issuer. At issuance, the CDO consisted of $903,750 of investment grade notes, $38,750 of
non-investment grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2006 Issuer and the 2006 Co-Issuer, and $57,500 of preferred shares, which were issued by the 2006 Issuer.
The investment grade notes were issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.37%. The Company incurred approximately $11,364 of costs related to
Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2006-1, which are amortized on a level-yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

In
August 2007, the Company issued $1,100,000 of CDO bonds through two newly-formed indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2007-1 Ltd., or the 2007 Issuer,
and Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2007-1 LLC, or the 2007 Co-Issuer. At issuance, the CDO consisted of $1,045,550 of investment grade notes, $22,000 of
non-investment grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2007 Issuer and the 2007 Co-Issuer, and $32,450 of preferred shares, which were issued by the 2007 Issuer.
The investment grade notes were issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.46%. The Company incurred approximately $16,816 of costs related to
Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2007-1, which are amortized on a level-yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

The
Company retained all non-investment grade securities, the preferred shares and the common shares in the Issuers and Co-Issuers of each CDO. The Issuer in each
CDO holds assets, consisting primarily of whole loans, subordinate interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments and CMBS, which serve as collateral for the CDO. Each CDO may
be replenished, pursuant to certain rating agency guidelines relating to credit quality and diversification, with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first five years of the
CDO. Thereafter, the CDO securities will be retired in sequential order from senior-most to junior-most as loans are repaid. The financial statements of the Issuer of each CDO
are consolidated in the Company's financial statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non-recourse to the Company. Proceeds from the sale of the
investment grade notes issued in each CDO were used to repay substantially all outstanding debt under the Company's repurchase agreements and to fund additional investments. Loans and other
investments owned by the CDO Issuers and Co-Issuers serve as collateral for the CDO bonds, and the income generated from these investments is used to fund interest obligations of the CDO bonds and the
remaining income, if any, is retained by the Company.

41

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

7. Collateralized Debt Obligations (Continued)

The
CDO bonds contain interest coverage and asset over-collateralization covenants that must be met in order for the Company to receive interest and other payments from the
CDOs. If the Company fails these covenants in any of its CDOs, all cash flows from the applicable CDO, other than senior collateral management fees, will be diverted to repay principal and interest on
the outstanding CDO bonds, and, until covenant compliance is reestablished, the Company will not receive any interest, equity or subordinate management fee payments from the applicable CDO. While the
Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the compliance margin was narrow and a relatively small decline in the Company's performance
and credit metrics could cause it to fall out of compliance in the future, with a corresponding loss of cash flow.

During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased, at a discount, $37,800 and $51,300, respectively, of investment grade notes previously issued by our
CDOs, respectively. The Company recorded a net gain on the early extinguishment of debt of $17,597 and $21,096 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in connection with the repurchase of notes of such Issuers.

8. Debt Obligations

Term Loan, Credit Facility and Repurchase Facility

The facility with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC or one or more of its affiliates, or Wachovia, was initially established as a
$250,000 facility in 2004, and was subsequently increased to $500,000 effective April 2005. In July 2008, the original facility was terminated and a new facility was executed with Wachovia to provide
for a total credit availability of $215,680, comprised of a term loan equal to $115,680 and a revolving credit facility equal to $100,000 with a credit spread of 242.5 basis points (which would have
been increased to 267.5 basis points upon an extension of the maturity of the credit facility). The term of the credit facility was two years and the borrowers were able to extend the term for an
additional twelve-month period if certain conditions were met. Advance rates for assets acquired pursuant to the credit facility varied from 50% to 80% of purchase price, depending on the type and
structure of the asset. In April 2009, the Company entered into an amendment with Wachovia, pursuant to which the maturity date of the credit facility was extended to March 31, 2011 and the
interest rate remained unchanged. The amendment also eliminated all financial covenants, eliminated Wachovia's right to impose future margin calls, reduced the recourse guarantee to be no more than
$10,000, and eliminated cross default provisions with respect to the Company's other indebtedness. The Company made a $13,000 deposit and provided other credit support to backstop letters of credit of
Wachovia issued in connection with the Company's mortgage debt obligations of certain of the Company's subsidiaries. The Company also agreed to attempt to divest of certain loan investments in the
future in order to further deleverage the credit facility and to forego additional borrowing under the facility. Borrowings under the Wachovia facility at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 were secured by mezzanine loans with a carrying value of $121,929 and $202,823, respectively. The Company had no accrued interest and borrowings of $60,637 at a weighted average spread to LIBOR
of 2.05% as of June 30, 2009, and no accrued interest and borrowings of $72,254 on the repurchase facility at a weighted average spread to LIBOR of 2.68% as of December 31, 2008.

42

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

Subsidiaries
of the Company also entered into a repurchase facility with Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, or Goldman. In October 2006, this facility was increased from $200,000 to
$400,000 and its maturity date extended until September 2009. In August 2008, the facility was amended to reduce the borrowing capacity to $200,000 and to provide for an extension of the maturity to
December 2010 for a fee, provided that no event of default has occurred. The facility bears interest at spreads of 2.00% to 2.30% over one-month LIBOR and provides for advance rates that
vary from 65% to 75% based upon the collateral provided under a borrowing base calculation. The lender has a consent right to the inclusion of investments in this facility, determines periodically the
market value of the investments, and has the right to require additional collateral, a partial repayment of the facility (margin call), or a reduction in unused availability under the facility,
sufficient to rebalance the facility if the estimated market value of the included investments declines. In April 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the amended and restated master
repurchase agreement and amended guaranty with Goldman, pursuant to which all financial covenants in the amended and restated repurchase agreement and the amended guaranty were eliminated and certain
other provisions of the amended and restated repurchase agreement and the amended guaranty were amended or deleted, including, among other things, the elimination of the existing recourse liability
and a relaxation of certain affirmative and negative covenants. The Company made a cash payment to Goldman in the amount of $4,000 to reduce the borrowings under the agreement. Borrowings under the
Goldman repurchase facility at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were secured by the mezzanine loans with a carrying value of $29,013 and $64,960, respectively. The Company had accrued
interest of $10 and borrowings of $4,339 at a weighted average spread to LIBOR of 2.50% as of June 30, 2009, and no accrued interest and borrowings of $23,643 at a weighted average spread to
LIBOR of 2.50% under this facility at December 31, 2008.

The
Goldman repurchase facility and the Wachovia credit facility require that borrowings under these facilities be repaid as principal payments on the loans and investments pledged to
these facilities are received or as proceeds from the sale of those investments are received. Currently, assets pledged as collateral under these facilities include interests in mezzanine loans.

In
January 2009, the Company closed a master repurchase facility with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. or JP Morgan, in the amount of $9,500. The term of the facility was through
July 23, 2010, the interest rate was 30-day LIBOR plus 175 basis points, the facility was recourse to the Company for 30% of the facility amount, and the facility was subject to
normal mark-to-market provisions after March 2009. Proceeds under the facility, which was fully drawn at closing, were used to retire certain borrowings under the Wachovia
credit facility. This facility was secured by a perfected security interest in a single debt investment. In March 2009, the Company terminated this facility by making a cash payment of approximately
$1,880 and transferring the full ownership and control of, and responsibility for, the related loan collateral to JP Morgan. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $8,843 in connection with the
collateral transfer.

Unsecured Credit Facility

In May 2006, the Company closed on a $100,000 senior unsecured revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank,
with an initial term of three years and a one-year

43

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

extension
option. In June 2007, the facility was increased to $175,000. The facility was supported by a negative pledge of an identified asset base. In March 2009, the Company entered into an
amendment and compromise agreement with KeyBank to settle and satisfy the loan obligations at a discount for a current cash payment of $45,000 and a maximum amount of up to $15,000 from 50% of all
payments from distributions after May 2009 from certain junior tranches and preferred classes of securities in the Company's CDOs. The Company recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $107,229
as a result of this agreement.

Mortgage Loans

Certain real estate assets are subject to mortgage liens. As of June 30, 2009, 718 of the Company's real estate assets were
encumbered with mortgage and mezzanine loans with a cumulative outstanding balance of $2,367,193. The Company's mortgage notes payable typically require that specified
loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios be maintained with respect to the financed properties before the Company can exercise certain rights under the loan agreements
relating to such properties. The Company is in compliance with these ratios as of June 30, 2009. If the specified criteria are not satisfied, in addition to other conditions that the Company
may have to observe, the Company's ability to release properties from the financing may be restricted and the lender may be able to "trap" portfolio cash flow until the required ratios are met on an
ongoing basis.

On
June 30, 2009, First States Investors 225, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ("First States 225") executed a first amendment of note, deed of trust
and other loan documents (the "Amendment") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee under a pooling and servicing agreement. First States 225 is the borrower under a $52,601 mortgage loan secured by a
Class A high rise office tower located in St. Louis, Missouri, designated as held for sale. The Amendment extends the original maturity of the mortgage from July 1, 2009 to
January 1, 2010. In addition, the Amendment establishes a monthly principal reserve requirement of $90 and implements monthly financial and operational reporting. The Company paid a 50 basis
point extension fee totaling $263 as well as lender's legal fees to secure the extension.



On April 1, 2008, certain subsidiaries of the Company, collectively, the Goldman Loan Borrowers, entered into a mortgage loan
agreement, or the Goldman Mortgage Loan, with Goldman Sachs Commercial Mortgage Capital, L.P., or GSCMC, Citicorp North America, Inc., or Citicorp and SL Green in connection with a
mortgage loan in the amount of $250,000, which is secured by certain properties owned or ground leased by the Goldman Loan Borrowers. The Goldman Mortgage Loan matures on March 9, 2010, with a
single one-year extension option. The terms of the Goldman Mortgage Loan were negotiated between the Goldman Borrowers and GSCMC and Citicorp. The Goldman Mortgage Loan bore interest at
4.35% over one-month LIBOR. The Goldman Mortgage Loan provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration of all amounts payable under the
Goldman Mortgage Loan. The Goldman Mortgage Loan allows for prepayment under the terms of the agreement, subject to a 1.00% prepayment fee, during the first six months payable to the lender, as long
as simultaneously therewith a proportionate prepayment of the

44

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

Goldman
Mezzanine Loan (discussed below) shall also be made on such date. In August 2008, an amendment to the loan agreement described below was entered into for the Goldman Mortgage Loan in
conjunction with the bifurcation of the Goldman Mezzanine loan into two separate mezzanine loans. Under this loan agreement amendment, the Goldman Mortgage Loan bears interest at 1.99% over LIBOR. The
Company had accrued interest of $247 and borrowings of $241,324 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $367 and borrowings of $242,568 as of December 31, 2008.



On April 1, 2008, First States Group 3300 B, L.P., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ("PB Loan
Borrower"), entered into a loan agreement, or the PB Loan Agreement, with PB Capital Corporation, as agent for itself and other lenders, in connection with a secured term loan in the amount of
$240,000, or the PB Loan in part to refinance a portion of a portfolio of American Financial's properties known as the WBBD Portfolio. The PB Loan matures on April 1, 2013 and bears interest at
1.65% over one-month LIBOR. The PB Loan is secured by mortgages on the 48 properties owned by the PB Loan Borrower and all other assets of the PB Loan Borrower. The PB Loan Agreement
provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration of all amounts payable under the PB Loan Agreement. The PB Loan Borrower may prepay the PB Loan, in
whole or in part (in amounts equal to at least $1,000), on any date. The Company had accrued interest of $394 and borrowings of $238,283 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $657 and
borrowings of $240,000 as of December 31, 2008.

The
PB Loan requires the Company to enter into an interest rate protection agreement within five days of the tenth consecutive LIBOR banking day on which the strike rate exceeds 6.00%
per annum. The interest rate protection agreement must protect the PB Loan Borrower against upward fluctuations of interest rates in excess of 6.25% per annum.

Certain
of the Company's mortgage notes payable related to assets held for sale contain provisions that require the Company to compensate the lender for the early repayment of the loan.

The
PB Loan Agreement contains certain semi-annual covenants relating to liquidity and tangible net worth. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the last
testing date, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Goldman Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loans

On April 1, 2008, certain subsidiaries of the Company, collectively, the Mezzanine Borrowers, entered into a mezzanine loan
agreement with GSCMC, Citicorp and SL Green in connection with a mezzanine loan in the amount of $600,000, or the Goldman Mezzanine Loan, which is secured by pledges of certain equity interests owned
by the Mezzanine Borrowers and any amounts receivable by the Mezzanine Borrowers whether by way of distributions or other sources. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan matures on March 9, 2010, with a
single one-year extension option. The terms of the Goldman Mezzanine Loan were negotiated between The Mezzanine Borrowers and GSCMC and Citicorp, The Goldman Mezzanine Loan bore interest
at 4.35% over one-month LIBOR. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration

45

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

of
all amounts payable under the Goldman Mezzanine Loan. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan allows for prepayment under the terms of the agreement, subject to a 1.00% prepayment fee during the first six
months, payable to the lender, as long as simultaneously therewith a proportionate prepayment of the Goldman Mortgage Loan shall also be made on such date. In addition, under certain circumstances the
Goldman Mezzanine Loan is cross-defaulted with events of default under the Goldman Mortgage Loan and with other mortgage loans, pursuant to which an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is
the mortgagor. In August 2008, the $600,000 mezzanine loan was bifurcated into two separate mezzanine loans (the Junior Mezzanine loan and the Senior Mezzanine Loan) by the lenders. Additional loan
agreement amendments were entered into for the Goldman Mezzanine Loan and Goldman Mortgage Loan. Under these loan agreement amendments, the Junior Mezzanine Loan bears interest at 6.00% over LIBOR,
the Senior Mezzanine Loan bears interest at 5.20% over LIBOR, and the Goldman Mortgage Loan bears interest at 1.99% over LIBOR. The weighted average of these interest rate spreads is equal to the
combined weighted average of the interest rates spreads on the
initial loans. The Company had accrued interest of $1,430 and borrowings of $569,122 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $1,821 and borrowings of $580,462 as of December 31,
2008.

The
Goldman Mezzanine Loan required and the Senior Mezzanine loan requires an environmental escrow reserve for the remediation of environmental conditions in the combined amount of $850.
Since August 2008, $575 of this reserve was released to the Mezzanine Borrowers, leaving a balance of $275 reserved with the lender as of June 30, 2009. The lender may upon the Company's
request disburse funds from the reserve on a monthly basis for the reimbursement of reasonable costs and expenses incurred to correct the environmental conditions.

Junior Subordinated Notes

In May 2005, August 2005 and January 2006, the Company completed issuances of $50,000 each in unsecured trust preferred securities
through three Delaware Statutory Trusts, or DSTs, Gramercy Capital Trust I, or GCTI, Gramercy Capital Trust II, or GCTII, and Gramercy Capital Trust III, or GCT III, that were wholly-owned
subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. The securities issued in May 2005 bore interest at a fixed rate of 7.57% for the first ten years ending June 2015 and the securities issued in August 2005
bore interest at a fixed rate of 7.75% for the first ten years ending October 2015. Thereafter, the rates were to float based on the three-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The securities issued in
January 2006 bore interest at a fixed rate of 7.65% for the first ten years ending January 2016, with an effective rate of 7.43% when giving effect to the swap arrangement previously entered into in
contemplation of this financing. Thereafter, the rate was to float based on the three-month LIBOR plus 270 basis points.

In
January 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into an exchange agreement with the holders of the securities, pursuant to which the Operating Partnership and the holders agreed to
exchange all of the previously issued trust preferred securities for newly issued unsecured junior subordinated notes, or the Junior Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000. The Junior
Notes will mature on June 30, 2035, or the Maturity Date, and will bear (i) a fixed interest rate of 0.50% per annum for the period beginning on January 30, 2009 and ending on
January 29, 2012 and (ii) a fixed interest rate of 7.50% per annum for the period commencing on January 30, 2012 through and including the Maturity

46

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

Date.
The Company, at its option, may redeem the Junior Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Junior Notes. The
optional redemption of the Junior Notes in part must be made in at least $25,000 increments. The Junior Notes also contain additional covenants restricting, among other things, the Company's ability
to declare or pay any dividends during the calendar year 2009 or make any payment or redeem any debt securities ranked pari passu or junior to the Junior Notes. In connection with the exchange
agreement, the final payment on the trust preferred securities for the period October 30, 2008 through January 29, 2009 was revised to be at a reduced interest rate of 0.50% per annum.

The
following is a summary of mortgage notes payable, mezzanine loan and acquisition loan facilities as of June 30, 2009:

Encumbered
Properties

Balance

Interest
Rates

Maturity DatesFixed-rate mortgages


477

$
1,318,464
(1)
4.55% to 8.29%

January 2010 to September 2023Variable-rate mortgages


241


479,607

1.97% to 6.32%

March 2010 to April 2013Total mortgage notes payable


718


1,798,071Above/below market interest





18,220Mortgage notes payable related to assets held for sale


(1
)

(52,601
)Balance, June 30, 2009


717

$
1,763,690


---

Combined
aggregate principal maturities of the Company's consolidated CDOs, Goldman repurchase facility and Wachovia credit facility, term loan, junior subordinated notes, mortgage loans

47

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

8. Debt Obligations (Continued)

and
mezzanine loans (including the Goldman Mortgage, Senior Mezzanine Loan and Junior Mezzanine loan) as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

CDOs

Term Loan,
Credit
Facility and
Repurchase
Facility

Junior
Subordinated
Notes

Mortgage and
Mezzanine Loans

Total2009 (July 1December 31)

$


$


$


$
13,050

$
13,0502010





4,339





899,302


903,6412011





60,637





25,121


85,7582012











80,285


80,2852013











621,253


621,253Thereafter


2,608,175





150,000


728,182


3,486,357Above/Below Market Interest











18,220


18,220Total

$
2,608,175

$
64,976

$
150,000

$
2,385,413

$
5,208,564


9. Lease Agreements

The Company's properties are leased and subleased to tenants under operating leases with expiration dates extending through the year 2027. These leases generally contain rent increases
and renewal options. Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable leases, excluding reimbursements for operating expenses, as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

Operating Lease2009 (July 1December 31)

$
138,5122010


263,6382011


206,4312012


189,6202013


178,925Thereafter


1,317,971Total minimum lease payments

$
2,295,097


10. Operating Partnership Agreement/Manager

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company owned all of the Class A limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. For the period January 1,
2009 through April 24, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, all of the Class B limited partner interests were owned by SL Green OP. For the period January 1, 2009 through
April 24, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, all of the interests in the Manager were held by SL Green OP. On April 24, 2009, the Company completed the internalization of management
through the direct acquisition of the Manager. The consideration paid to SL Green in the transaction was de minimis. Accordingly, beginning in May 2009, management and incentive fees

48

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

10. Operating Partnership Agreement/Manager (Continued)

payable
by the Company to the Manager ceased and the Company owns all of the Class B limited partner interests (which have been cancelled) and all of the interests in the Manager.

11. Related Party Transactions

On April 24, 2009, in connection with the internalization, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into a securities transfer agreement with SL Green OP, Manager Corp.
and SL Green, pursuant to which (i) SL Green OP and Manager Corp. agreed to transfer to the Operating Partnership membership interests in the Manager and (ii) SL Green OP agreed to
transfer to the Operating Partnership its Class B limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership, in exchange for certain de minimis cash consideration. The securities transfer
agreement contains standard representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities. No distributions were due on the Class B limited partner interests for the period ended June 30, 2009
or otherwise in connection with the internalization.

Concurrently
with the execution of the securities transfer agreement, the Company also entered into a special rights agreement with SL Green OP and SL Green, pursuant to which SL Green
and SL Green OP agreed to provide the Company certain management information systems services from April 24, 2009 through the date that is 90 days thereafter and the Company agreed to
pay SL Green OP a monthly cash fee of $25 in connection therewith. The Company also agreed to use its best efforts to operate as a REIT during each taxable year and to, so long as SL Green OP owns at
least 7.5% of the shares of the Company's common stock, cause the Company's tax counsel to provide legal opinions to SL Green relating to the Company's REIT status. As of June 30, 2009,
management information systems services were no longer being provided by SL Green or SL Green OP.

In
connection with its initial public offering, the Company entered into a management agreement with the Manager, which was subsequently amended and restated in April 2006. The
management agreement was further amended in September 2007, and amended and restated in October 2008 and was subsequently terminated in connection with the internalization. The management agreement
provided for a term through December 2009 with automatic one-year extension options and was subject to certain termination rights. The Company paid the Manager an annual management fee
equal to 1.75% of the Company's gross stockholders equity (as defined in the management agreement) inclusive of the Company's trust preferred securities. In October 2008, the Company entered into the
second amended and restated management agreement with the Manager which generally contained the same terms and conditions as the amended and restated management agreement, as amended, except for the
following material changes: (1) reduced the annual base management fee to 1.50% of the Company's gross stockholders equity; (2) reduces the termination fee to an amount equal to the
management fee earned by the Manager during the 12 months preceding the
termination date; and (3) commencing July 2008, all fees in connection with collateral management agreements were to be remitted by the Manager to the Company. The Company incurred expense to
the Manager under this agreement of an aggregate of $2,115 and $7,787 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, and $9,106 and $16,251 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, respectively.

49

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Prior to the internalization, to provide an incentive to enhance the value of the Company's common stock, the holders of the Class B limited partner interests of the Operating
Partnership were entitled to an incentive return equal to 25% of the amount by which FFO plus certain accounting gains and losses (as defined in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership)
exceed the product of the weighted average stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5% (divided by four to adjust for quarterly
calculations). The Company recorded any distributions on the Class B limited partner interests as an incentive distribution expense in the period when earned and when payments of such became
probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with the partnership agreement. In October 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Class B limited partners to waive the
incentive distribution that would have otherwise been earned for the period July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and provided that the starting January 1, 2009, the incentive
distribution could have been paid, at the Company's option, in cash or shares of common stock. In December 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to
which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL Green transferred to the Company, 1.9 million shares of the Company's common stock, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that
the holders of the Class B limited partner interests of the Operating Partnership may have had to the Operating Partnership, and the Operating Partnership may have to the holders, each in
accordance with the amended operating partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, in respect of the recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of the 2008 calendar
year. The Company incurred approximately $2,604 and $5,100 with respect to such Class B limited partner interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. No
incentive distribution was earned by the Class B limited partner interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Prior
to the internalization, the Company was obligated to reimburse the Manager for its costs incurred under an asset servicing agreement between the Manager and an affiliate of SL
Green OP and a separate outsource agreement between the Manager and SL Green OP. The asset servicing agreement, which was amended and restated in April 2006, provided for an annual fee payable to SL
Green OP by the Company of 0.05% of the book value of all credit tenant lease assets and non-investment grade bonds and 0.15% of the book value of all other assets. The asset servicing fee
could have been reduced by SL Green OP for fees paid directly to outside servicers by the Company. The outsource agreement provided for an annual fee payable by the Company, which became $2,814 per
year subsequent to the closing of the American Financial merger to reflect higher costs resulting from the increased size and number of assets of the combined company, increasing 3% annually over the
prior year on the anniversary date of the outsource agreement in August of each year. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company realized expense of $683 and $1,024,
respectively, to the Manager under the outsource agreement. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred expense of $163 and $250, respectively, pursuant to the
special servicing agreement. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company realized expense of $1,365 and $2,676, respectively, to the Manager under the asset servicing
agreement. In October 2008, each of the asset servicing agreement and outsource agreement was terminated, effective as of September 30, 2008. In October 2008, the outsource agreement was
terminated and the asset servicing agreement was replaced with that certain interim asset servicing agreement between the Manager and

50

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

an
affiliate of SL Green, pursuant to which the Company was obligated to reimburse the Manager for its costs incurred thereunder from October 2008 until April 24, 2009 when such agreement was
terminated in connection with the internalization. Pursuant to that agreement, the SL Green affiliate acted as the rated special servicer to the Company's CDOs, for a fee equal to two basis points per
year on the carrying value of the specially serviced loans assigned to it. Concurrent with the internalization, the interim asset servicing agreement was terminated and the Manager entered into a
special servicing agreement with an affiliate of SL Green, pursuant to which the SL Green affiliate agreed to act as the rated special servicer to the Company's CDOs for a period beginning on
April 24, 2009 through the date that is the earlier of (i) 60 days thereafter and (ii) a date on which a new special servicing agreement is entered into between the Manager
and a rated third-party special servicer. The SL Green affiliate will be entitled to a servicing fee equal to (i) 25 basis points per year on the outstanding principal balance of assets with
respect to certain specially serviced assets and (ii) two basis points per year on the outstanding principal balance of assets with respect to certain other assets. The April 24, 2009
agreement was terminated effective June 23, 2009; however the Company previously entered into the new special servicing arrangements with SitusServe, L.P., which became the rated special
servicer for the Company's CDOs. An affiliate of SL Green continues to provide special servicing services with respect to a limited number of loans owned by the Company that are secured by properties
in New York City, or in which the Company and SL Green are co-investors.

On
October 27, 2008, the Company entered into a services agreement with SL Green and SL Green OP which was subsequently terminated in connection with the internalization. Pursuant
to the services agreement, SL Green agreed to provide consulting and other services to the Company. SL Green would make Marc Holliday, Andrew Mathias and David Schonbraun available in connection with
the provision of the services until the earliest of (i) September 30, 2009, (ii) the termination of the management agreement or (iii) with respect to a particular
executive, the termination of any such executive's employment with SL Green. In consideration for the consulting services, the Company paid a fee to SL Green of $200 per month, payable, at its option,
in cash or, if permissible under applicable
law or the requirements of the exchange on which the shares of the Company's common stock trade, shares of its common stock. SL Green also provided the Company with certain other services described in
the services agreement for a fee of $100 per month in cash and for a period terminating at the earlier of (i) three months after the date of the services agreement, subject to a
one-time 30-day extension, or (ii) the termination of the management agreement. By a separate agreement and a separate fee, SL Green and SL Green OP agreed to perform
special servicer activities for the Company through one of their rated special serving affiliates for a period beginning on April 24, 2009 through the date that is the earlier of
(i) 60 days thereafter or (ii) a date on which a new special servicer agreement is entered into between the Manager and a rated third-party servicer. The April 24, 2009
agreement was terminated effective June 23, 2009; however the Company previously entered into the new special servicing arrangements with SitusServe, L.P., which became the rated special
servicer for the Company's CDOs. An affiliate of SL Green continues to provide special servicing services with respect to a limited number of loans owned by the Company that are secured by properties
in New York City, or in which the Company and SL Green are co-investors.

In
connection with the closing of the Company's first CDO in July 2005, the 2005 Issuer, entered into a collateral management agreement with the Manager. Pursuant to the collateral
management

51

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

agreement,
the Manager has agreed to provide certain advisory and administrative services in relation to the collateral debt securities and other eligible investments securing the CDO notes. The
collateral management agreement provides for a senior collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum
of the net outstanding portfolio balance, and a subordinate collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.25% per
annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance. Net outstanding portfolio balance is the sum of the (i) aggregate principal balance of the collateral debt securities, excluding defaulted
securities, (ii) aggregate principal balance of all principal proceeds held as cash and eligible investments in certain accounts, and (iii) with respect to the defaulted securities, the
calculation amount of such defaulted securities. As compensation for the performance of its obligations as collateral manager under the first CDO, the Board of Directors had allocated to the Manager
the subordinate collateral management fee paid on the CDO notes not held by the Company. In October 2008, pursuant to the second amended and restated management agreement, the Manager had, commencing
July 1, 2008, agreed to remit this amount to the Company. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company owned all of the non-investment grade bonds, preferred
equity and equity in the 2005 CDO. The senior collateral management fee and balance of the subordinate collateral management fee is allocated to the Company. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, the Company realized expense of $512 and $1,024, respectively, to the Manager under such collateral management agreement.

Prior
to the internalization, fees payable in connection with CDOs or other securitization vehicles, except for the 2005 CDO, were governed by the management agreement. Pursuant to the
management agreement, if a collateral manager is retained as part of the formation of a CDO or other securitization vehicle, the Manager or an affiliates will be the collateral manager and will
receive the following fees: (i) 0.25% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a managed transitional CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with the
Company or the Manager, which CDO is structured to own loans secured by transitional properties, (ii) 0.15% per annum of the book value of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a
managed non-transitional CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with the Company or the Manager, which CDOs structured to own loans secured by
non-transitional properties, (iii) 0.10% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a static CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with the
Company or the Manager, which CDO is structured to own non-investment grade bonds, and (iv) 0.05% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a static CDO that
are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated the Company or the Manager, which CDO is structured to own investment grade bonds. For the purposes of the management agreement, a "managed
transitional" CDO means a CDO that is actively managed, has a reinvestment period and is structured to own debt collateral secured primarily by non-stabilized real estate assets that are
expected to experience substantial net operating income growth, and a "managed non-transitional" CDO means a CDO that is actively managed, has a reinvestment period and is structured to
own debt collateral secured primarily by stabilized real estate assets that are not expected to experience substantial net operating income growth. Both "managed transitional" and "managed
non-transitional" CDOs may at any given time during the reinvestment period of the respective vehicles invest in and own non-debt collateral (in limited quantity) as defined by
the respective indentures. If any fees are paid to the

52

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

collateral
manager in excess of the fee structure provided for above, such fees are paid to the Company. In October 2008, pursuant to the second amended and restated management agreement, the Manager,
commencing July 1, 2008, agreed to remit this amount to the Company. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company realized expense of approximately $571 to the Manager under this
agreement. With respect to the CDO which closed in August, 2007, the Company realized expense to the Manager of $216 and $432 for the for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively.

In
connection with the internalization, the management agreement was terminated and the fees payable in connection with the Company's 2006 and 2007 CDOs will be governed by their
respective collateral management agreements. The collateral management agreement for the Company's 2006 CDO provides for a senior collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the
priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance, and a subordinate collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with
the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.25% per annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance. Net outstanding portfolio balance is the sum of the (i) aggregate
principal balance of the collateral debt securities, excluding defaulted securities, (ii) aggregate principal balance of all principal proceeds held as cash and eligible investments in certain
accounts, and (iii) with respect to the defaulted securities, the calculation amount of such defaulted securities. The collateral management agreement for the Company's 2007 CDO provides for a
senior collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to (i) 0.05% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of
the CMBS securities, (ii) 0.10% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of loans, preferred equity securities, cash and certain defaulted securities, and (iii) a subordinate
collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of the loans,
preferred equity securities, cash and certain defaulted securities.

Commencing
in May 2005, the Company is party to a lease agreement with SLG Graybar Sublease LLC, an affiliate of SL Green, for the Company's corporate offices at 420 Lexington
Avenue, New York, New York. The lease is for approximately 7,300 square feet and carries a term of 10 years with rents of approximately $249 per annum for year one rising to $315 per annum in
year ten. In May and June 2009, the Company amended its lease with SLG Graybar Sublease LLC to increase the leased premises by approximately 2,260 square feet. The additional premises is leased
on a co-terminus basis with the remainder of the Company's leased premises and carries rents of approximately $103 per annum during the initial lease year and $123 per annum during the
final lease year. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid $185 and $285 and $62 and $125, under this lease, respectively.

In
July 2005, the Company closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $40,000 mezzanine loan which bears interest at 11.20%. As part of that sale, the seller retained an
interest-only participation. The mezzanine loan is secured by the equity interests in an office property in New York, New York. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
loan had a book value of $39,400 and $39,520, respectively.

In
March 2006, the Company closed on the purchase of a $25,000 mezzanine loan, which bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 8.00%, to a joint venture in which SL Green is an
equity holder.

53

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

The
mezzanine loan was repaid in full on May 9, 2006, when the Company originated a $90,287 whole loan, which bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75%, to the joint venture. The
whole loan is secured by office and industrial properties in northern New Jersey and had a book value of $86,630 and $90,595 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

In
June 2006, the Company closed on the acquisition of a 49.75% TIC interest in 55 Corporate Drive, located in Bridgewater, New Jersey with a 0.25% interest to be acquired in the future.
The remaining 50% of the property was owned as a TIC interest by an affiliate of SL Green OP. The property was comprised of three buildings totaling 670,000 square feet which was 100% net leased to an
entity whose obligations were guaranteed by Sanofi-Aventis Group through April 2023. The transaction was valued at $236,000 and was financed with a $190,000, 10-year,
fixed-rate first mortgage loan. In January 2009, the Company and SL Green sold 100% of the respective interests in 55 Corporate Drive.

In
December 2006, the Company acquired from a financial institution a pari-passu interest of $125,000 in a $200,000 mezzanine loan, which bears interest at 6.384% and is
secured by a multi-family portfolio in New York, New York. An affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired the remaining $75,000 pari-passu interest in the mezzanine loan. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $104,949 and $118,702, respectively.

In
January 2007, the Company originated two mezzanine loans totaling $200,000. The $150,000 loan was secured by a pledge of cash flow distributions and partial equity interests in a
portfolio of multi-family properties and bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.00%. The $50,000 loan was initially secured by cash flow distributions and partial equity interests in an
office property. On March 8, 2007 the $50,000 loan was increased by $31,000 when the existing mortgage loan on the property was defeased, upon which event the Company's loan became secured by a
first mortgage lien on the property and was reclassified as a whole loan. The whole loan currently bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.00% for the initial funding and
one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% for the subsequent funding. At closing, an affiliate of SL Green acquired from the Company and held a 15.15% pari-passu interest in the mezzanine
loan and the whole loan. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company's interest in the whole loan had a carrying value of $62,814 and $66,607, respectively. The investment in
the mezzanine loan was repaid in full in September 2007.

In
April 2007, the Company purchased for $103,200 a 45% TIC interest to acquire the fee interest in a parcel of land located at 2 Herald Square, located along
34th Street in New York, New York. The acquisition was financed with a $86,063 10-year fixed rate mortgage loan. The property is subject to a long-term
ground lease with an unaffiliated third party for a term of 70 years. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. The TIC interests are pari-passu.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $28,712 and $26,118, respectively. The Company recorded its pro rata share of net income of $1,250 and
$2,513 and $1,250 and $2,752 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In
July 2007, the Company purchased for $144,240 an investment in a 45% TIC interest to acquire a 79% fee interest and 21% leasehold interest in the fee position in a parcel of land
located at 885 Third Avenue, on which is situated The Lipstick Building. The transaction was financed with a $120,443

54

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

10-year
fixed rate mortgage loan. The property is subject to a 70-year leasehold ground lease with an unaffiliated third party. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. The TIC interests are pari passu. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $41,401 and $37,070,
respectively. The Company recorded its pro rata share of net income of $1,497 and $3,016 and $1,408 and $3,340 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The
Company's agreements with SL Green in connection with the Company's commercial property investments in 885 Third Avenue and Two Herald Square, contain a buy-sell
provision that can be triggered by the Company in the event it and SL Green are unable to agree upon a major decision that would materially impair the value of the assets. Such major decisions involve
the sale or refinancing of the assets, any extensions or modifications to the leases with the tenant therein or any material capital expenditures.

In
August 2007, the Company closed on the purchase from a financial institution of a $12,500 mezzanine loan on a substantially complete residential condominium project in the upper east
side of Manhattan. The investment bore interest at the current pay rate of 11% over LIBOR, and a 19% look-back internal rate of return at maturity. At closing, an affiliate of SL Green
simultaneously acquired a $12,500 pari-passu interest in the same tranche of the capital structure. The loan matured in August 2008 and was retired by a negotiated payoff below par.

In
September 2007, the Company acquired a 50% interest in a $25,000 senior mezzanine loan from SL Green. Immediately thereafter the Company, along with SL Green, sold all of its
interests in the loan to an unaffiliated third party. Additionally, the Company acquired from SL Green a 100% interest in a $25,000 junior mezzanine loan associated with the same properties as the
preceding senior mezzanine loan. Immediately thereafter the Company participated 50% of its interest in the loan back to SL Green. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan has
a book value of $0 and $11,925, respectively. In October 2007, the Company acquired a 50% pari-passu interest in $57,795 of two additional tranches in the senior mezzanine loan from an
unaffiliated third party. At closing, an affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired the other 50% pari-passu interest in the two tranches. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 the loan had a book value of $23,193 and $28,026, respectively.

In
November 2007, the Company acquired from a syndicate comprised of financial institutions a $25,000 interest in a $100,000 junior mezzanine investment secured by a hotel portfolio and
franchise headquarters. An affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired and owns another $25,000 interest in the investment. The investment was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an
effective spread to one-month LIBOR of 9.50%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $0 and $15,655, respectively.

In
December 2007, the Company acquired a $52,000 interest in a senior mezzanine loan from a financial institution. Immediately thereafter the Company participated 50% of its interest in
the loan to an affiliate of SL Green. The investment, which is secured by a retail property in New York, New York, was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an effective spread to
one-month LIBOR of 5.00%. In July 2009, the Company sold its remaining interest in the loan to an affiliate of SL Green for

55

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

11. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

$16,120
pursuant to purchase rights established when the loan was acquired. In anticipation of the sale, the Company recorded $1,926 of additional impairment charges during the three months ended
June 30,
2009. The loan was originally funded under the Company's credit facility with Wachovia, as amended in April 2009. Accordingly, terms of the sale were subject to approval by Wachovia. The sale includes
contingent participation in future net proceeds from SL Green of up to $1,040 in excess of the purchase price upon their ultimate disposition of the loan. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $15,941 and $24,599, respectively.

In
December 2007, the Company acquired a 50% interest in a $200,000 senior mezzanine loan from a financial institution. Immediately thereafter the Company participated 50% of the
Company's interest in the loan to an affiliate of SL Green. The investment was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an effective spread to one-month LIBOR of 6.50%. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $27,801 and $46,488, respectively.

In
connection with the closing of the acquisition of American Financial, the Company, as part of a larger financing, received financing of $50,000 from SL Green, which is described more
fully in Note 8. An affiliate SL Green was granted 644,787 shares of common stock for services rendered, subject to a one-year vesting period. These shares had a value of
approximately $11,213 on the date of issuance.

In
August 2008, the Company closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $9,375 pari-passu participation interest in a $18,750 first mortgage. The loan is secured
by a retail shopping center located in Staten Island, New York. The investment bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.50%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book
value of $9,256 and $9,324, respectively.

In
September 2008, the Company closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $30,000 interest in a $135,000 mezzanine loan. The loan is secured by the borrower's interests in a
retail condominium located New York, New York. The investment bears interest at an effective spread to one-month LIBOR of 10.00%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
the loan had a book value of $29,014 and $30,367, respectively.

12. Deferred Costs

Deferred costs at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:

2009

2008Deferred financing

$
78,028

$
77,102Deferred acquisition


1,548


1,600Deferred leasing


1,731


1,05681,307


79,758Less accumulated amortization


(37,320
)

(26,451
)43,987


53,307Less held for sale


(611
)

(59
)$
43,376

$
53,248


56

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

12. Deferred Costs (Continued)

Deferred
financing costs relate to the Company's existing Goldman repurchase facility, the Company's term loan and credit facility with Wachovia, the Goldman Mortgage Loan, the Goldman
Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loans, the PB Loan Agreement, the Company's CDOs, mortgage loans, and the junior subordinated notes. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis to
interest expense based on the contractual term of the related financing.

Deferred
acquisition costs consist of fees and direct costs incurred to originate the Company's investments and are amortized using the effective yield method over the related term of
the investment.

Deferred
leasing costs include direct costs incurred to initiate and renew operating leases and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term.

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB Staff Position on FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of fair value information about
financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statement of financial condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair values are based upon the application of discount rates to estimated future cash flows based upon market yields or by using other valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to
interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments.
The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair value amounts.

The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value:



57

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)



The
following table presents the carrying value in the financial statements, and approximate fair value of other financial instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008:

June 30, 2009

December 31, 2008Carrying Value

Fair Value

Carrying Value

Fair ValueFinancial assets:Government securities

$
99,447

$
100,361

$
101,576

$
106,796Lending investments

$
1,779,167

$
1,620,519

$
2,213,473

$
2,040,914CMBS

$
947,663

$
404,675

$
869,973

$
299,985Financial liabilities:Mortgage note payable and senior and junior mezzanine loans

$
2,385,413

$
2,190,083

$
2,413,467

$
1,821,448Unsecured credit facility

$


$
14,958

$
172,301

$
167,916Term loan, credit facility and repurchase facility

$
64,976

$
64,329

$
95,897

$
94,321Collateralized debt obligations

$
2,608,175

$
1,159,923

$
2,608,065

$
1,021,114Junior subordinated debentures

$
150,000

$
132,835

$
150,000

$
134,300


Disclosure
about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Although the Company
is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the reasonable fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since
June 30, 2009 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

The
Company adopted SFAS 157 which, among other things, requires additional disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchal
disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The following discussion of fair value was determined by the Manager,
using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, fair values are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair
value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial
instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have less, or no, pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in

58

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

measuring
fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair value amounts.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the table below based upon the lowest level of significant
input to the valuations. Derivatives were classified as Level III due to the significance of the credit valuation allowance which is based upon less observable inputs

At June 30, 2009

Total

Level I

Level II

Level IIIFinancial Liabilities:Derivative instruments

$
96,563

$


$


$
96,563


Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

The Company uses fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis in its assessment of assets classified as loans and other lending
investments and lending investments held for sale, which are reported at cost and have been written down to fair value as a result of valuation allowances. The following table shows the fair value
hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations for which a non-recurring change
in fair value has been recorded:

At June 30, 2009

Total

Level I

Level II

Level IIIFinancial Assets:Lending investments

$
570,946

$


$


$
570,946Lending investments held for sale

$
102,441

$


$


$
102,441


The
total change in fair value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 was $167,412 and $220,183, respectively.

The
valuations derived from pricing models overall valuation process may include adjustments to the financial instruments. These adjustments may be made when, in management's judgment,
either the size of the position in the financial instrument or other features of the financial instrument such as its complexity, or the market in which the financial instrument is traded (such as
counterparty, credit, concentration or liquidity) require that an adjustment be made to the value derived from the pricing models. Additionally, an adjustment from the price derived from a model
typically reflects management's judgment that other participants in the market for the financial instrument being measured at fair value would also consider such an adjustment in pricing that same
financial instrument.

Financial
assets and liabilities presented at fair value and categorized as Level III are generally those that are marked to model using relevant empirical data to extrapolate an
estimated fair value. The models' inputs reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument in a current period transaction and outcomes from the models represent an exit
price and expected future

59

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

cash
flows. The parameters and inputs are adjusted for assumptions about risk and current market conditions. Changes to inputs in valuation models are not changes to valuation methodologies, rather,
the inputs are modified to reflect direct or indirect impacts on asset classes from changes in market conditions. Accordingly, results from valuation models in one period may not be indicative of
future period measurements.

14. Stockholders' Equity

The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 125,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value, of which the Company has authorized the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.001 par value per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2009, 49,848,333 shares of common stock and 4,600,000 shares of preferred stock
were issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock

In April 2007, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 8.125% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock (including the
underwriters' over-allotment option of 600,000 shares) with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. Holders of the Series A cumulative redeemable preferred shares
are entitled to receive annual dividends of $2.03125 per share on a quarterly basis and dividends are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. On or after April 18, 2012, the Company may at
its option redeem the Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock at par for cash. Net proceeds (after deducting underwriting fees and expenses) from the offering were approximately
$111,205. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company's board of directors, elected not to pay the quarterly Series A preferred stock dividend of $0.50781 per share. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company accrued preferred stock dividends of $6,981 and $2,325, respectively. Covenants in the Junior Notes restrict the Company's ability to
declare or pay dividends on its common or preferred stock during the calendar year 2009.

Common Stock

In April 2008, the Company issued approximately 15,634,854 shares of common stock in connection with the American Financial
acquisition. These shares had a value of approximately $378,672 on the date the merger agreement was executed. Also, as a result of the American Financial acquisition, an affiliate of SL Green was
granted 644,787 shares of common stock for services rendered, subject to an one-year vesting period. These shares had a value of approximately $11,213 on the date of issuance. Subsequent
to issuance, SL Green OP owned approximately 15.8% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock.

In
December 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL Green transferred to the
Company, 1.9 million shares of the Company's common stock, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that the holders of Class B limited partner interests may have in respect of
the recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of 2008 calendar year. The shares of common

60

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

14. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

stock
were cancelled upon receipt by the Company. Subsequent to the letter agreement, SL Green OP owned approximately 12.5% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock.

Equity Incentive Plan

As part of the Company's initial public offering, the Company instituted its Equity Incentive Plan. The Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended, authorizes (i) the grant of stock options that qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or ISOs, (ii) the
grant of stock options that do not qualify, or NQSOs, (iii) the grant of stock options in lieu of cash directors' fees and (iv) grants of shares of restricted and unrestricted common
stock. The exercise price of stock options will be determined by the compensation committee, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of grant.
At June 30, 2009, 1,092,901 shares of common stock were available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan.

Options
granted under the Equity Incentive Plan to recipients who are employees of Gramercy are exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant and, subject to termination of
employment, expire ten years from the date of grant, are not transferable other than on death, and are exercisable in three to four annual installments commencing one year from the date of grant. In
some instances, options may be granted under the Equity Incentive Plan to persons who provide significant services to
the Company or are employees of SL Green. Options granted to recipients that are not employees have the same terms as those issued to employees except as it relates to any performance-based provisions
within the grant. To the extent there are performance provisions associated with a grant to a recipient who is not an employee, an estimated expense related to these options is recognized over the
vesting period and the final expense is reconciled at the point performance has been met, or the measurement date. If no performance based provision exists, the fair value of the options is calculated
on a quarterly basis and the related expense is recognized over the vesting period.

A
summary of the status of the Company's stock options as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are presented below:

June 30, 2009

December 31, 2008Options
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Options
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Exercise
PriceBalance at beginning of period


1,691,336

$
17.61


1,428,169

$
22.82Modification




$



110,716

$
Granted


30,000

$
1.25


385,000

$
5.30Exercised




$



(85,547
)
$
14.83Lapsed or cancelled


(83,373
)
$
20.78


(147,002
)
$
25.52Balance at end of period


1,637,963

$
17.15


1,691,336

$
17.61


For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, all options were granted at a price of $1.25. The remaining weighted average contractual life of the options was
7.2 years. Compensation expense of $48 and $62 and $263 and $527 was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to the issuance of stock
options.

61

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

14. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Through June 30, 2009, 1,135,004 restricted shares had been issued under the Equity Incentive Plan, of which 50% have vested. The vested and unvested shares are currently entitled
to receive distributions on common stock if declared by the Company. Holders of restricted shares are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest but are provided the ability to vote such
shares beginning on the date of grant. Compensation expense of $107 and $152 and $671 and $1,530 was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to
the issuance of restricted shares.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In November 2007, the Company's board of directors adopted, and the stockholders subsequently approved in June 2008, the 2008 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, to encourage its employees to increase their efforts to make the Company's business more successful by providing equity-based incentives to eligible employees. The ESPP
is intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and has been adopted by the board to enable the Company's eligible employees to
purchase its shares of common stock through payroll deductions. The ESPP became effective on January 1, 2008 with a maximum of 250,000 shares of the common stock available for issuance, subject
to adjustment upon a merger, reorganization, stock split or other similar corporate change. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission with respect to the ESPP. The common stock will be offered for purchase through a series of successive offering periods. Each offering period will be three months in duration and will begin
on the first day of each calendar quarter, with the first offering period having commenced on January 1, 2008. The ESPP provides for eligible employees to purchase the common stock at a
purchase price equal to 85% of the lesser of (1) the market value of the common stock on the first day of the offering period or (2) the market value of the common stock on the last day
of the offering period. An immaterial amount of shares have been purchased under this plan.

Outperformance Plan

In June 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved a long-term incentive compensation program, the
2005 Outperformance Plan. Participants in the 2005 Outperformance Plan, were to share in a "performance pool" if the Company's total return to stockholders for the period from June 1, 2005
through May 31, 2008 exceeded a cumulative total return to stockholders of 30% during the measurement period over a base share price of $20.21 per share. The Company recorded the expense of the
plan award in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123(R). Compensation expense of $308 and $617 was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, related to the
2005 Outperformance Plan. Based on the
Company's total return to stockholders as of the May 31, 2008 measurement period conclusion date, the Company did not meet the minimum 30% return threshold and accordingly, the plan
participants automatically forfeited the LTIP Units and the 2005 Outperformance Plan expired as of that date.

62

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

14. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Deferred Stock Compensation Plan for Directors

Under the Company's Independent Director's Deferral Program, which commenced April 2005, the Company's independent directors may elect
to defer up to 100% of their annual retainer fee, chairman fees and meeting fees. Unless otherwise elected by a participant, fees deferred under the program shall be credited in the form of phantom
stock units. The phantom stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon such directors' termination of service from the Board of Directors or a change in control by
the Company, as defined by the program. Phantom stock units are credited to each independent director quarterly using the closing price of the Company's common stock on the applicable dividend record
date for the respective quarter. Each participating independent director who elects to receive fees in the form of phantom stock units has the option to have their account credited for an equivalent
amount of phantom stock units based on the dividend rate for each quarter or have dividends paid in cash.

As
of June 30, 2009, there were approximately 210,694 phantom stock units outstanding, of which 198,694 units are vested.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is computed as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2008

2009

2008NumeratorIncome (loss)Basic Earnings:Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(198,142
)
$
10,060

$
(225,443
)
$
33,194Effect of dilutive securities











Diluted Earnings:Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

$
(198,142
)
$
10,060

$
(225,443
)
$
33,194DenominatorWeighted average sharesBasicShares available to common shareholders


49,818


51,166


49,839


42,966Effect of dilutive securitiesStock based compensation plans





81





158Phantom stock units





44





43Diluted shares


49,818


51,291


49,839


43,167


Diluted
income (loss) per share assumes the conversion of all common share equivalents into an equivalent number of common shares, as long as their inclusion would not be antidilutive.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, 190 and 144 share options and 210 and 210 phantom share units,

63

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

14. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

both
computed under the treasury share method, respectively, were excluded from the diluted loss per share computation as their effect would have been antidilutive for both periods.

Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was comprised of the following:

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2008Net unrealized gains on held to maturity securities

$
1,697

$
9,771Net realized and unrealized losses on interest rate swap and cap agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges


(101,264
)

(68,398
)Total accumulated and other comprehensive loss

$
(99,567
)
$
(58,627
)


Total
comprehensive income (loss) totaled $(155,989) and $44,897 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

15. Benefit Plans

In June 2009, the Company implemented a 401(K) Savings/Retirement Plan, or the 401(K) Plan, to cover eligible employees of the Company, and any designated affiliate. The 401(K) Plan
permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. The employees' elective deferrals are immediately vested and
non-forfeitable. The 401(K) Plan provides for annual discretionary matching contributions by the Company. Prior to the implementation of the 401(K) Plan, as an affiliate of SL Green, the
Company's employees were eligible to participate in a 401(K) Savings/Retirement Plan implemented by SL Green. Except for the 401(k) Plan, at June 30, 2009, the Company did not maintain a
defined benefit pension plan, post-retirement health and welfare plan or other benefit plans.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company and the Operating Partnership are not presently involved in any material litigation nor, to the Company's knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company
or its investments, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the costs, if any, incurred by the Operating Partnership and the Company related to
litigation will not materially affect its financial position, operating results or liquidity.

The
Company's corporate offices at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York are subject to an operating lease agreement with SLG Graybar Sublease LLC, an affiliate of SL Green,
effective May 1, 2005. The lease is for approximately 7,300 square feet and carries a term of 10 years with rents of approximately $249 per annum for year one rising to $315 per annum in
year ten. In May and June 2009, the Company amended its lease with SLG Graybar Sublease LLC to increase the leased premises by approximately 2,260 square feet. The additional premises is leased
on a co-terminus basis with the

64

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

16. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

remainder
of the Company's leased premises and carries rents of approximately $103 per annum during the initial lease year and $123 per annum during the final lease year.

As
of June 30, 2009, the Company leased certain of its commercial properties from third parties with expiration dates extending to the year 2085 and has various ground leases with
expiration dates extending through 2101. These lease obligations generally contain rent increases and renewal options.

Future
minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

2009 (July 1December 31)

$
9,8162010


19,6702011


19,5582012


19,1562013


19,0302014 and thereafter


179,858Total

$
267,088


The
Company, through certain of its subsidiaries, may be required in its role in connection with its CDOs, to repurchase loans that it contributed to its CDOs in the event of breaches of
certain representations or warranties provided at the time the CDOs were formed and the loans contributed. These obligations do not relate to the credit performance of the loans or other collateral
contributed to the CDOs, but only to breaches of specific representations and warranties. Since inception, the Company has not been required to make any repurchases.

Certain
real estate assets are pledged as collateral for mortgage loans held by two of the Company's CDOs. Additionally, borrowings secured by these pledges are guaranteed by the
Company.

17. Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

FASB No. 133, or SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which became effective January 1, 2001, requires the Company to recognize
all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge,
changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other
comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. Ineffectiveness may
increase or decrease reported net income and stockholders' equity prospectively, depending on future levels of LIBOR interest rates and other variables affecting the fair
values of derivative instruments and hedged items, but will have no effect on cash flows, provided the contract is carried through to full term.

The
following table summarizes the notional and fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2009. The notional value is an indication of the extent of
the Company's

65

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

17. Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging (Continued)

involvement
in this instrument at that time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks:

Benchmark Rate

Notional Value

Strike
Rate

Effective
Date

Expiration
Date

Fair
ValueInterest Rate Swap

1 month LIBOR

$
3,465


4.280
%

7/2005


12/2009

$
(55
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


3,465


5.178
%

4/2006


3/2010


(97
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


12,000


9.850
%

8/2006


8/2011


(817
)Interest Rate Swap

1 month LIBOR


42,718


4.990
%

1/2007


1/2017


(4,967
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


347,908


5.408
%

8/2007


5/2017


(25,831
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


699,441


5.331
%

8/2007


1/2018


(59,141
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


14,650


4.425
%

11/2007


7/2015


(715
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


12,000


3.063
%

1/2008


7/2010


(254
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


2,000


3.073
%

1/2008


7/2010


(42
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


24,143


5.114
%

2/2008


1/2017


(1,721
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


16,412


5.203
%

2/2008


5/2017


(1,210
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


4,700


3.170
%

4/2008


4/2012


(132
)Interest Rate Swap

1 month LIBOR


9,375


4.260
%

8/2008


1/2015


(460
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


10,000


3.920
%

10/2008


10/2013


(408
)Interest Rate Swap

3 month LIBOR


17,500


3.920
%

10/2008


10/2013


(713
)Interest Rate Cap

1 month LIBOR


250,000


5.250
%

4/2008


3/2010


Interest Rate Cap

1 month LIBOR


600,000


5.250
%

8/2008


3/2010


Total



$
2,069,777










$
(96,563
)


At
June 30, 2009, derivative instruments were reported at their fair value as a net liability of $96,563. The changes in fair value of derivatives for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 are represented as deferred losses in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) of $60,883. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized a
decrease to interest expense of $76 and $19, respectively, attributable to any ineffective component of its derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Currently, all derivative instruments
are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. Over time, the realized and unrealized gains and losses held in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) will be reclassified into earnings in the
same periods in which the hedged interest payments affect earnings.

18. Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code beginning with it's taxable year ended December 31, 2004. To
qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a
REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it
will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to

66

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

18. Income Taxes (Continued)

qualify
for treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief
under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company's net income
and net cash available for distributions to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it is organized and will operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and the Company
intends to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that it will qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company may, however, be subject to certain state and local
taxes.

For
the three and six months ended, June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded $134 and $2,401 and $0 and $11 of income tax expense, respectively, in net income (loss) from
continuing operations. Included in tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is $2,100 of state income taxes on the gain of extinguishment of debt of $107,229. Under federal tax law,
the Company is allowed to defer this gain until 2014, but not all states follow this federal rule.

19. Segment Reporting

Prior to the acquisition of American Financial, the Company was a REIT focused primarily on originating and acquiring loans and securities related to real estate, and under the
provisions of SFAS 131 operated in only one segment. As a result of the acquisition of American Financial, the Company has determined that it has two reportable operating segments: Finance and
Real Estate. The reportable segments were determined based on the management approach, which looks to the Company's internal organizational structure. These two lines of business require different
support infrastructures.

The
Finance segment includes all of the Company's activities related to senior and mezzanine real estate debt and senior and mezzanine capital investment activities and the financing
thereof, including the Company's CMBS investments. These include a dedicated management team within Gramercy Finance for real estate lending origination, acquisition and servicing.

The
Real Estate segment includes all of the Company's activities related to the ownership and leasing of commercial real estate and credit net lease properties. In connection with the
Company's significant increase in the size and scope of its real estate portfolio resulting from the American Financial acquisition, the Company initiated the build-out of an integrated
asset management
platform within Gramercy Realty to consolidate responsibility for, and control over, leasing, lease administration, property management, and tenant relationship management.

67

---



Gramercy Capital Corp.

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2009

19. Segment Reporting (Continued)

The
Company evaluates performance based on the following financial measures for each segment:

Finance

Real Estate

Corporate/
Other(1)

Total CompanyThree months ended June 30, 2009Total revenues(2)

$
46,890

$
111,619

$


$
158,509Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures


2,650


(675
)




1,975Total operating and interest expense(3)


(238,786
)

(104,050
)

(9,552
)

(352,388
)Net income (loss) from continuing operations(4)

$
(189,246
)
$
6,894

$
(9,552
)
$
(191,904
)




Finance

Real Estate

Corporate/
Other(1)

Total CompanySix months ended June 30, 2009Total revenues(2)

$
101,770

$
220,242

$


$
322,012Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures


5,503


(1,316
)




4,187Total operating and interest expense(3)


(309,730
)

(208,945
)

(18,335
)

(537,010
)Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(202,457
)
$
9,981

$
(18,335
)
$
(210,811
)Total Assets

$
3,917,994

$
4,033,309

$
(710,309
)
$
7,240,994


---

68

---





ITEM 2:    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  (Unaudited amounts in thousands, except for share and per share data)

Overview

Gramercy Capital Corp. is a self-managed, integrated commercial real estate finance and property investment company. We
were formed in April 2004 and commenced operations upon the completion of our initial public offering in August 2004. On April 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of American Financial Realty
Trust (NYSE: AFR), or American Financial, in a transaction with a total value of approximately $3.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $1.3 billion of American
Financial's secured debt. The acquisition transformed our company from a pure specialty finance company into a diversified enterprise with complementary business lines consisting of commercial real
estate finance and property investments.

We
conduct substantially all of our operations through our operating partnership, GKK Capital LP, or our Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of our Operating
Partnership. From our inception until April 2009, we were externally managed and advised by GKK Manager LLC, or the Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green Realty Corp. (NYSE: SLG), or
SL Green. On April 24, 2009, we completed the internalization of management through the direct acquisition of the
Manager from SL Green. As a result of the internalization, beginning in May 2009, management and incentive fees payable by us to the Manager ceased, and we added 77 former employees of the Manager to
our own staff. We expensed approximately $5,010 for acquisition costs incurred through June 30, 2009 in connection with our acquisition of the Manager. At June 30, 2009, SL Green
Operating Partnership, L.P., or SL Green OP, owned approximately 12.5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Our
commercial real estate finance business, which operates under the name Gramercy Finance, focuses on the direct origination and acquisition of whole loans, bridge loans, subordinate
interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity, commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and other real estate related securities. Our property investment business, which operates
under the name Gramercy Realty, focuses on the acquisition and management of commercial properties leased primarily to regulated financial institutions and affiliated users throughout the United
States. These institutions are for the most part deposit taking commercial banks, thrifts and credit unions, which we generally refer to as "banks." Our portfolio of wholly-owned and jointly-owned
bank branches and office buildings is leased to large banks such as Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, Wachovia Bank National Association (now owned by Wells Fargo & Company, or Wells
Fargo), or Wachovia Bank, Regions Financial Corporation, or Regions Financial, and Citizens Financial Group, Inc., or Citizen Financial, and to mid-sized and community banks.
Neither Gramercy Finance nor Gramercy Realty is a separate legal entity but are divisions of us through which our commercial real estate finance and property investment businesses are conducted.

We
have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, and generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income taxes to the extent we distribute our income to our stockholders. We have in the past established, and may in the future establish taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, to
effect various taxable transactions. Those TRSs would incur U.S. federal, state and local taxes on the taxable income from their activities. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to
"we," "our" and "us" mean Gramercy Capital Corp.

Since
our inception, we have completed debt investment transactions in a variety of markets and secured by a variety of property types. Until the second half of 2007, the market for
commercial real estate debt exhibited high relative returns and significant inflows of capital. However, due to growing illiquidity in the credit markets and an overall slowing in macroeconomic
conditions, the default levels for commercial real estate have risen. The market for debt instruments had for several years, until the

69

---



second
half of 2007, evidenced declining yields and more flexible credit standards and loan structures. In particular, "conduit" originators who packaged whole loans for resale to investors drove debt
yields lower while maintaining substantial liquidity because of the then-strong demand for the resulting securities. Because of reduced profits in the most liquid sectors of the mortgage
finance business then existing, several large institutions began originating large bridge loans for the purpose of generating interest income, rather than the typical focus on trading profits. In
response to those developments, we focused on areas where we had comparative advantages rather than competing for
product merely on the basis of yield or structure. This had particularly included whole loan origination in markets and transactions where we had an advantage due to (i) knowledge or
relationships we have, (ii) knowledge or relationships of our largest stockholder, SL Green, and (iii) an ability to better assess and manage risks over time. When considering investment
opportunities in secondary market transactions in tranched debt, we often avoided first loss risk in larger transactions due to the then-high valuations of the underlying real estate
relative to historic valuation levels. Because of the then-significant increase in the value of institutional quality assets relative to historic norms, we focused on positions in which a
property sale or conventional refinancing at loan maturity, based on normalized valuation and lending standards, would provide for a complete return of our investment. We generally matched our assets
and liabilities in terms of base interest rate (generally one-month LIBOR) and, to the extent possible, expected duration. We raised debt and equity in several different capital markets to
improve the diversity of our funding sources, maintain liquidity, and achieve our match-funding objectives.

However,
beginning in the second quarter of 2007, the sub-prime residential lending and single family housing markets in the U.S. began to experience significant default
rates, declining real estate values and increasing backlog of housing supply, and other lending markets experienced higher volatility and decreased liquidity resulting from the poor credit performance
in the residential lending markets. Concerns in the residential sector of the capital markets quickly spread more broadly into the asset-backed, commercial real estate, corporate and other credit and
equity markets. The factors described above have resulted in substantially reduced mortgage loan originations and securitizations, and caused more generalized credit market dislocations and a
significant contraction in available credit. As a result, most financial industry participants, including commercial real estate lenders and investors, including us, continue to find it difficult to
obtain cost-effective debt capital to finance new investment activity or to refinance maturing debt.

Credit
spreads on commercial mortgages (i.e., the interest rate spread over given benchmarks such as LIBOR or U.S. Treasury securities) are significantly influenced by:
(a) supply and demand for such mortgage loans; (b) perceived risk of the underlying real estate collateral cash flow; and (c) capital markets execution for the sale or financing
of such commercial mortgage assets. The number of potential lenders in the market place and the amount of funds they are willing to devote to commercial mortgage assets will impact credit spreads. As
liquidity increases, spreads on equivalent commercial mortgage loans will decrease. Conversely, a lack of liquidity results in credit spreads increasing. During periods of volatility, such as the
markets we are currently experiencing, the number of lenders participating in the market may change at an accelerated pace. Further, many lenders depend on the capital markets to finance their
portfolio of commercial loans. Lenders are forced to increase the credit spread at which they are willing to lend as liquidity in the capital market decreases. As the market tightens, many warehouse
lenders have requested additional collateral or repayments with respect to their loans in order to maintain margins that are acceptable to them.

For
existing loans, when credit spreads widen, the fair value of these loans decreases. If a lender were to originate a similar loan today, such loan would carry a greater credit spread
than the existing loan. Even though a loan may be performing in accordance with its loan agreement and the underlying collateral has not changed, the fair value of the loan may be negatively impacted
by the incremental interest foregone from the widened credit spread. Accordingly, when a lender wishes to sell or finance the loan, the reduced value of the loan may reduce the total proceeds that the
lender will receive.

70

---



We
believe the current environment of rapidly changing and evolving markets will provide increasing challenges to both our industry and our Company. We continue to believe the commercial
lending business can provide attractive risk-adjusted returns, however, it is being adversely affected by volatility in the credit and capital markets and due to these uncertainties, we
are experiencing the following: (i) sharply lower loan originations, (ii) reduced access to capital, and increased cost of financing, (iii) reduced cash available for distribution
to stockholders, particularly as our portfolio is reduced by scheduled maturities and prepayments and (iv) increased instances of defaults by borrowers.

During
2008 and to date in 2009, the global capital markets continued to experience tremendous volatility and a wide-ranging lack of liquidity. The impact of the global
credit crisis on our sector has been acute. Transaction volume has declined significantly, credit spreads for all forms of mortgage debt investments have reach all-time highs, issuance
levels of CMBS have ground to a halt, and other forms of financing from the debt markets have been dramatically curtailed. Financial institutions still hold significant inventories of unsold loans and
CMBS, creating a further overhang on the markets. We believe that the continuing dislocation in the debt capital markets, coupled with a recession in the U.S., has reduced property valuations and has
adversely impacted commercial real estate fundamentals. These developments can impact and have impacted the performance of our existing portfolio of financial and real property assets. Furthermore,
the volatility in the capital markets has caused stress to all financial institutions and, our business is dependent upon these counterparties for, among other things, financing, rental payments on
the majority of our owned properties and interest rate derivatives. We expect the general unavailability of credit to continue at least through 2009 and perhaps beyond.

It
is difficult to predict when conditions in our business will improve. We expect that the adverse circumstances and trends in our business and securities will continue through at least
the remainder of 2009, and will begin to improve thereafter only as the credit markets and overall economy improve. Continued disruption in the global credit markets or further deterioration in those
markets may have a material adverse effect on our ability to repay or refinance our borrowings and our ability to grow and operate our business.

We
have responded to these difficult conditions by sharply decreasing investment activity when we observed deteriorating market conditions, increasing our liquidity, extending debt
maturities and restructuring certain of our debt facilities. In addition, beginning with the third quarter of 2008, our board of directors elected to not pay the dividend on common stock, which for
the second quarter of 2008 was $0.63 per share. Our board of directors also elected not to pay the Series A preferred stock dividend of $0.50781 per share beginning with the fourth quarter of
2008. The preferred stock dividend for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first and second quarters of 2009 has been accrued for as of June 30, 2009. In January 2009, we exchanged our $150,000
of trust preferred securities for a new $150,000 junior subordinated debenture. As part of such transaction, we agreed that we will not make
any distributions on, or repurchases of, our common stock or preferred stock for all of 2009. Our board of directors will revisit our dividend policy in 2010. We may elect to pay dividends on our
common stock in cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock as permitted under U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT distribution requirements.

In
response to these market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a number of mechanisms designed to add stability to the financial markets, including the
provision of direct and indirect assistance to distressed financial institutions, temporary prohibitions on short sales of certain financial institution securities, assistance by the banking
authorities in arranging acquisitions of weakened banks and broker-dealers and implementation of programs by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity to the commercial paper markets and securities
market. On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or the EESA was enacted into law. The EESA authorized the U.S. Secretary of Treasury to create a Troubled Asset
Relief Program, or TARP, to purchase from financial institutions up to $700 billion of residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based
on, or related to, such mortgages, that in each case was originated or

71

---



issued
on or before March 14, 2008. The ESSA also provides for a program that would allow companies to insure their troubled assets. The U.S. Treasury has announced the establishment of the
following programs under TARP: the Capital Purchase Program, the Targeted Investment Program, the Systemically Failing Institutions Program, the Asset Guarantee Program, the Auto Industry Financing
Program and the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, which is partially financed by TARP. In addition, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA, was signed into law on
February 17, 2009. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health and education needs. ARRA also imposes
certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future TARP recipients.

On
November 25, 2008, the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve jointly announced the establishment of the Troubled Asset Loan Facility ("TALF"). Under the TALF, upon satisfaction
of certain terms and conditions, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ("FRBNY") makes non-recourse loans to borrowers collateralized by certain eligible collateral, which initially
included certain highly rated asset-backed securities, but not non-agency mortgage backed securities or commercial mortgage-backed securities. On March 23, 2009 the U.S. Treasury
and the Federal Reserve announced preliminary plans to expand the TALF to include certain highly rated non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, as well as highly rated commercial
mortgage-backed securities. As of July 2009, commercial mortgage-backed securities can be used as collateral for a TALF loan. However, to date, neither the FRBNY nor the U.S. Treasury has announced
how or when the TALF will be expanded to non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities.

On
March 23, 2009, the U.S. Treasury, in conjunction with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, and the Federal Reserve, announced the establishment of the
Public-Private Investment Program ("PPIP"). The PPIP has two primary components: a Legacy Loans Program and a Legacy
Securities Program. The Legacy Loans Program component of the PPIP contemplates the establishment of joint public and private investment funds ("Legacy Loans PPIFs") to purchase troubled loans from
insured depository institutions with equity capital from both the U.S. Treasury and private investors and non-recourse debt issued by the Legacy Loans PPIF and guaranteed by the FDIC. It
is currently not clear whether and on what terms the Legacy Loans Program will continue.

The
U.S. Treasury has selected nine asset managers under the Legacy Securities Program to raise investments for and manage joint public and private investment funds ("Legacy Securities
PPIFs") that will purchase certain non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities issued prior to January 1, 2009. Legacy Securities PPIF are eligible for equity and debt
financing from the U.S. Treasury.

The
overall effects of these and other legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets is uncertain, and they may not have the intended stabilization effects. Should these or
other legislative or regulatory initiatives fail to stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and
adversely affected.

Even
if legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or
operations, and we may incur increased capital requirements and constraints or additional costs in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment. It is
uncertain what effects recently enacted or future legislation or regulatory initiatives will have on us. Given the volatile nature of the current market disruption and the uncertainties underlying
efforts to mitigate or reverse the disruption, we may not timely anticipate or manage existing, new or additional risks, contingencies or developments, including regulatory developments and trends in
new products and services, in the current or future environment. Our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

72

---



All
of our term CDO liabilities are in their reinvestment periods which means when the underlying assets repay we are able to reinvest the proceeds (assuming we are in compliance in our
CDOs with certain financial covenants) in new assets without having to repay the liabilities. Because credit spreads are currently much wider than when we issued these liabilities, we currently expect
to earn a higher return on equity on capital redeployed in this market. Approximately $0.7 billion, or 38.3%, of our loans have maturity dates in 2009. However, many of these loans contain
extension options of at least six months (many subject to performance criteria) and we expect that substantially all loans that qualify will be extended, so it is difficult to estimate how much
capital from initial maturities or early pre-payments may be recycled into higher earning investments.

The
recent credit crisis has put many borrowers and financial institutions, including many of our borrowers and tenants, under increasing amounts of financial and capital distress. This
has led to an increased incidence of defaults under loans and leases and could lead to increased vacancy rates in office properties servicing these institutions.

The
aggregate carrying values, allocated by product type and weighted average coupons of our loans, and other lending investments and CMBS investments as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, including loans held for sale, were as follows:

Carrying Value(1)

Allocation by
Investment Type

Fixed Rate:
Average Yield(2)

Floating Rate:
Average Spread over
LIBOR(3)2009

2008

2009

2008

2009

2008

2009

2008Whole loans, floating rate

$
1,024,838

$
1,222,991


57.6
%

55.3
%







428 bps


418 bpsWhole loans, fixed rate


145,091


189,946


8.1
%

8.6
%

7.01
%

7.17
%




Subordinate interests in whole loans, floating rate


79,239


80,608


4.5
%

3.6
%







266 bps


564 bpsSubordinate interests in whole loans, fixed rate


44,689


63,179


2.5
%

2.9
%

7.14
%

9.22
%




Mezzanine loans, floating rate


271,066


396,190


15.2
%

17.9
%







619 bps


654 bpsMezzanine loans, fixed rate


202,101


248,558


11.4
%

11.2
%

9.27
%

10.21
%




Preferred equity, fixed rate


12,143


12,001


0.7
%

0.5
%

7.20
%

10.22
%




Subtotal/Weighted average


1,779,167


2,213,473


100.0
%

100.0
%

8.16
%

8.96
%

457 bps


480 bpsCMBS, floating rate


70,911


70,893


7.5
%

8.1
%







315 bps


945 bpsCMBS, fixed rate


876,752


799,080


92.5
%

91.9
%

6.31
%

6.26
%




Subtotal/Weighted average


947,663


869,973


100.0
%

100.0
%

6.31
%

6.26
%

315 bps


945 bpsTotal

$
2,726,830

$
3,083,446


100.0
%

100.0
%

6.89
%

7.32
%

450 bps


498 bps


---

73

---



As of June 30, 2009, Gramercy Finance also held interests in two credit tenant net lease investments, or CTL investments, two interests in joint ventures holding fee positions on
properties subject to long-term ground leases and a 100% fee interest in a property subject to a long-term ground lease.

As
of June 30, 2009, Gramercy Realty owned a portfolio comprised of 668 bank branches, 331 office buildings and six land parcels, of which 72 bank branches and one office building
were partially owned through joint ventures. Our wholly-owned properties aggregated approximately 26.0 million rentable square feet and our partially-owned properties aggregated approximately
0.7 million rentable square feet, including 0.4 million rentable square feet in an unconsolidated joint venture. As of June 30, 2009, the occupancy of our wholly-owned properties
was 88.0% and the occupancy for our partially-owned properties was 99.9%. Our two largest tenants are Bank of America and Wachovia Bank and, as of June 30, 2009, they represented approximately
42.7% and 15.6%, respectively, of the rental income of our portfolio and occupied approximately 47.1% and 18.1%, respectively, of our total rentable square feet.

Summarized
in the table below are our key property portfolio statistics as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Number of Properties

Square Feet

OccupancyPortfolio

At
June 30,
2009

At
December 31,
2008

At
June 30,
2009

At
December 31,
2008

At
June 30,
2009

At
December 31,
2008Core


644


644


20,018,305


20,747,772


95.7
%

96.0
%ValueAdd


205


222


4,561,161


4,721,333


66.6
%

70.1
%Subtotal


849


866


24,579,466


25,469,105


90.3
%

91.2
%Held for Sale


84


103


1,832,235


1,337,709


59.9
%

42.1
%Total(1)


933


969


26,411,701


26,806,814


88.2
%

88.7
%


---

Due
to the nature of the business of our tenant base, which places a high premium on serving its customers from a well established distribution network, we typically enter into
long-term leases with our financial institution tenants. As of June 30, 2009, the weighted average remaining term of our leases was 10.0 years and approximately 79.9% of our
base revenue was derived from long-term leases with financial institution tenants. With in-house capabilities in acquisitions, asset management, property management and
leasing, we are focused on maximizing the value of our portfolio through strategic sales and through effective and efficient property management and leasing operations.

We
rely on the credit and equity markets to finance and grow our business. Beginning the second half of 2007 and throughout 2008 and the first two quarters of 2009 severe credit and
liquidity issues in the sub-prime residential lending and single family housing sectors negatively impacted the asset-backed and corporate fixed income markets, and the equity securities
of financial institutions and real estate companies. As the severity of residential sector issues increased, nearly all securities markets experienced reduced liquidity and greater risk premiums as
concerns about the outlook for the U.S. and world economic growth increased. These concerns continue and risk premiums in many capital and credit markets remain at or near all-time highs
with liquidity extremely low compared to historical standards or virtually non-existent. As a result, most commercial real estate finance and financial services industry participants,
including us, have reduced new investment activity until the capital and credit markets become more stable, the macroeconomic outlook becomes clearer and market liquidity increases. In this
environment, we are focused on actively managing portfolio credit, generating and

74

---



recycling
liquidity from existing assets, leasing vacant space, extending debt maturities and reducing corporate overhead.

Liquidity
is a measurement of the ability to meet cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain loans and other investments, pay dividends and
other general business needs. In addition to cash on hand, our primary sources of funds for short-term liquidity requirements, including working capital, distributions, if any, debt
service and additional investments, if any, consists of (i) cash flow from operations; (ii) proceeds and management fees from our existing CDOs; (iii) proceeds from principal and
interest payments and rents on our investments; (iv) proceeds from potential loan and asset sales; and, to a lesser extent, (v) new financings or additional securitization or CDO
offerings and (vi) proceeds from additional common or preferred equity offerings. We believe these sources of financing will be sufficient to meet our short term liquidity requirements. Due to
continued market turbulence, we do not anticipate having the ability in the near term to access new equity or debt capital through new warehouse lines, CDO issuances, term or credit facilities or
trust preferred issuances, although we continue to explore capital raising options. In the event we are not able to successfully secure financing, we will rely on cash at hand, cash flows from
operations, principal and lease payments on our investments and proceeds from asset and loan sales to satisfy our liquidity requirements. If we (i) are unable to renew, replace or expand our
sources of financing, (ii) are unable to execute asset and loan sales in a timely manner or to receive anticipated proceeds from them or (iii) fully utilize available cash, it may have
an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The
majority of our loan and other investments are pledged as collateral for our CDO bonds and the income generated from these investments is used to fund interest obligations of our CDO
bonds and the remaining income, if any, is retained by us. Our CDO bonds contain interest coverage and asset over-collateralization covenants that must be met in order for us to receive
interest and other payments from the CDOs. If we fail these covenants in any of our CDOs, all cash flows from the applicable CDO, other than senior collateral management fees, will be diverted to
repay principal and interest on the outstanding CDO bonds, and, until covenant compliance is reestablished, we will not receive any interest, equity or subordinate management fee payments from the
applicable CDO. While we were in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2009, our compliance margin was narrow and relatively small declines in our performance and credit metrics
could cause us to fall out of compliance in the future, with a corresponding loss of cash flow.

In
the event of a breach of our CDO covenants that we could not cure in the near term, we would be required to fund our non-CDO expenses, with (i) cash on hand,
(ii) income from any CDO not in default, (iii) income from our real property and unencumbered loan assets, (iv) sale of assets, (v) or accessing the equity or debt capital
markets, if available. We have the right to cure defaults, which would resume normal payments to us. However, we may not have sufficient liquidity available to do so at such time.

The
following discussion related to our consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements appearing in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, known as GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make some complex and subjective decisions and
assessments. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments, which could significantly affect our reported assets, liabilities and contingencies, as well as our reported
revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our financial statements are based were reasonable at the time made based

75

---



upon
information available to us at that time. We evaluate these decisions and assessments on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. We have identified our most critical accounting policies to be the following:

Variable Interest Entities

Our ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS from a single issuer may provide us with the right to control the foreclosure/workout
process on the underlying loans. There are certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a qualifying special-purpose
entity, or QSPE, does not consolidate that entity unless the investor has the unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate. FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, or
SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," provides the requirements for an entity to qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE
exception, the special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and must continue to satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A special-purpose entity's QSPE status can be affected in
future periods by activities by its transferors or other involved parties, including the manner in which certain servicing activities are performed. To the extent that our CMBS investments were issued
by a special-purpose entity that meets the QSPE requirements, we record those investments at the purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying special-purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE
requirements, we follow the guidance set forth in FIN 46R as the special-purpose entities would be determined to be VIEs.

We
have analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing each of our controlling class CMBS investments and we believe that the terms of those agreements conform to industry
standards and are consistent with the QSPE criteria.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance that eliminates the qualifying special purpose entity concept including the exemption under which we exclude certain CMBS investments from
consolidation. Accordingly, in January 2010, we anticipate it will be required to consolidate these CMBS investments. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standards.

At
June 30, 2009, we owned securities of three controlling class CMBS trusts with a carrying value of $40,290. The total par amounts of CMBS issued by the three CMBS trusts was
$921,654. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected losses or residual returns, we have concluded that we would not be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying special-purpose
entities. At June 30, 2009, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our investment in these QSPEs totaled $40,290, which equals the book value of these investments as of June 30,
2009.

The
financing structures that we offer to the borrowers on certain of our real estate loans involve the creation of entities that could be deemed VIEs and therefore, could be subject to
FIN 46R. Our management has evaluated these entities and has concluded that none of such entities are VIEs that are subject to the consolidation rules of FIN 46R.

Real Estate and CTL Investments

We record acquired real estate and CTL investments at cost. Costs directly related to the acquisition of such investments are
capitalized. Certain improvements are capitalized when they are determined to increase the useful life of the building. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
shorter of the estimated useful life of the capitalized item or 40 years for buildings, five to ten years for building equipment and fixtures, and the lesser of the useful life or the remaining
lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests. Maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.

76

---



In
leasing office space, we may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for tenant allowances, we determine whether the allowance represents funding for
the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership, for accounting purposes, of such improvements. If we are considered the owner of the leasehold improvements for accounting
purposes, we capitalize the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciate it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the lease term. If the tenant allowance represents a
payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event we are not considered the owner of the
improvements for accounting purposes, the allowance is considered to be a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue. Factors considered during this
evaluation usually include (i) who holds legal title to the improvements, (ii) evidentiary requirements concerning the spending of the tenant allowance, and (iii) other
controlling rights provided by the lease agreement (e.g. unilateral control of the tenant space during the build-out process). Determination of the accounting for a tenant allowance
is made on a case-by-case basis, considering the facts and circumstances of the individual tenant lease.

Results
of operations of properties acquired are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

We
also review the recoverability of the property's carrying value when circumstances indicate a possible impairment of the value of a property. The review of recoverability is based on
an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property's use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as expected
future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If management determines impairment exists due
to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property for properties to be
held and used and for assets held for sale, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the fair value less estimated cost to dispose for assets held for sale. These
assessments are recorded as an impairment loss in the consolidated statements of operations, resulting in an immediate negative adjustment to net income.

In
accordance with FASB No. 141(R), or FAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations," we allocate the purchase price of real estate to land, building and improvements, and
intangibles, such as the value of above-, below- and at-market leases, and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. We depreciate the amount allocated to building
and other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years. The values of the above- and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as
either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The value associated with
in-place leases is amortized over the expected term of the respective lease. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are
being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the
lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). We assess fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize
appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known
trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property.

Leasehold Interests

Leasehold interest assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the fair value of our estimate of the net
present value of cash flows expected to be paid and earned from the subleases over the non-cancelable lease terms and any payments received in consideration for assuming

77

---



the
leasehold interests. Factors used in determining the net present value of cash flows include contractual rental amounts, costs of tenant improvements, costs of capital expenditures and amounts due
under the corresponding operating lease assumed. Amounts allocated to leasehold interests, based on their respective fair values, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
lease term.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We account for our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting since we exercise significant
influence, but do not unilaterally control the entities, and we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R. In the joint ventures, the rights of the other investors are
protective and participating. Unless we are determined to be the primary beneficiary, these rights preclude us from consolidating the investments. The investments are recorded initially at cost as an
investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently are adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions. Any difference between the carrying amount of the
investments on our balance sheet and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized as an adjustment to equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures over the lesser of the joint
venture term or 40 years. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to us. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we had investments of $102,669 and $93,919 in unconsolidated
joint ventures, respectively.

Assets Held for Sale



Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan
origination fees, discounts, repayments, sales of partial interests in loans, and unfunded commitments unless such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. Loans held for sale are carried at the
lower of cost or market value using available market information obtained through consultation with dealers or other originators of such investments. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, we had loans and other lending investments held for sale of $102,441 and $0, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $41,951and
$126,379, respectively, related to the mark-to-market of the loans designated as held for sale.



In accordance with FASB No. 144, or SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," real estate investments or CTL investments to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value, less cost to sell. Once an asset is classified as held for
sale, depreciation expense is no longer recorded and current and prior periods are reclassified as Discontinued Operations. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had real estate
investments held for sale of $164,510 and $192,780, respectively.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

We designate our CMBS investments pursuant to FASB No. 115, or SFAS No. 115, on the date of acquisition of the
investment. Held to maturity investments are stated at cost plus any premiums or discounts which are amortized through the consolidated statements of operations using the level yield method. CMBS
securities that we do not hold for the purpose of selling in the near-term but may dispose of prior to maturity, are designated as available-for-sale and are
carried at estimated fair value with the net unrealized gains or losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholder's equity. Unrealized losses on
securities that in the judgment of management are other than temporary are charged against earnings as a loss on the consolidated

78

---



statement
of operations. The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing of loss
realization. In addition, it is possible that we in the future may need to recognized our other-than-temporary impairment notwithstanding our continued determination that no
credit loss has occurred and estimated cash flows remain stable, due to the duration that the estimated fair value remains below book value. In November 2007, subsequent to financing our CMBS
investments in our CDOs, we redesignated all of our available-for-sale CMBS investments with a book value of approximately $43,600 to held to maturity. As of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the unrealized loss on the redesignated CMBS investments included in other comprehensive income was $4,701 and $4,986, respectively.

We
account for CMBS (other than those of high credit quality or sufficiently collateralized to ensure that the possibility of credit loss is remote) under Emerging Issues Task Force
99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets," or EITF 99-20. Accordingly, on a
quarterly basis, when significant changes in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously estimated occur due to actual prepayment and credit loss experience, and the present value of the
revised cash flow is less then the present value previously estimated, an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred. The security is written down to fair value
with the resulting charge against earnings and a new cost basis is established. We calculate a revised yield based on the current amortized cost of the investment (including any
other-than-temporary impairments recognized to date) and the revised yield is then applied prospectively to recognize interest income.

In
January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1. This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to align it with the impairment
guidance within SFAS 115 by removing from EITF 99-20 the requirement to place exclusive reliance on market
participants' assumptions about future cash flows when evaluating an asset for other-than-temporary impairment. The standard now requires that assumptions about future cash
flows consider reasonable management judgment about the probability that the holder of an asset will be unable to collect all amounts due.

We
determine the fair value of CMBS based on the types of securities in which we have invested. For liquid, investment-grade securities, we consult with dealers of such securities to
periodically obtain updated market pricing for the same or similar instruments. For non-investment grade securities, we actively monitor the performance of the underlying properties and
loans and update our pricing model to reflect changes in projected cash flows. The value of the securities is derived by applying discount rates to such cash flows based on current market yields. The
yields employed are obtained from our own experience in the market, advice from dealers and/or information obtained in consultation with other investors in similar instruments. Because fair value
estimates when available, may vary to some degree, we must make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values for financial reporting purposes.
Different judgments and assumptions could result in materially different presentations of value.

Pledged Government Securities

We maintain a portfolio of treasury securities that are pledged to provide principal and interest payments for mortgage debt previously
collateralized by properties in our real estate portfolio. We do not intend to sell the securities and believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the full amortized cost basis of the
securities over their remaining life. These securities had a carrying value of $99,447 a fair value of $100,361 and unrealized gains of $914 at June 30, 2009, and have maturities that extend
through November 2013.

79

---



Tenant and Other Receivables

Tenant and other receivables are primarily derived from the rental income that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its
lease, which is recorded on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since many leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis
accounting requires us to record a receivable, and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables that will only be received if the tenant
makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. Tenant and other receivables also include receivables related to tenant reimbursements for common area
maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses that are recognized as revenue in the period in which the related expenses are incurred.

Tenant
and other receivables are recorded net of the allowances for doubtful accounts, which as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $6,221 and $6,361, respectively.
We continually review receivables related to rent, tenant reimbursements and unbilled rent receivables and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the
financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the
collectability of a receivable is in doubt, we increase the allowance for uncollectible accounts or record a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated statements of
operations.

Intangible Assets

Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, we follow the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. To ensure that intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a purchase method business combination are recognized and reported apart from goodwill, we apply criteria specified in SFAS No. 141.

We
allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land,
buildings and improvements on an as-if-vacant basis. We utilize various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if-vacant property
value. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. Identifiable intangible assets include
amounts allocated to acquired leases for above- and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases.

Above-market,
below-market and in-place lease values for properties acquired are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and management's estimate of the fair market lease rate for
each such in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction
of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial
term and any fixed-rate renewal periods in the respective leases.

The
aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted
to market rental rates and the property valued as-if-vacant. Factors considered by management in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate
of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we
include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the anticipated lease-up period, which is expected to average six
months. We also estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

80

---



The
value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which range primarily from one to 22 years. In no event does the
amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is
charged to expense.

In
making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the
acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as
well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.

Revenue Recognition



Rental income from leases is recognized on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are contractually due. Certain
lease agreements also contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse us for real estate taxes, common area maintenance costs and the amortized cost of capital expenditures with interest. Such
amounts are included in both
revenues and operating expenses when we are the primary obligor for these expenses and assume the risks and rewards of a principal under these arrangements. Under leases where the tenant pays these
expenses directly, such amounts are not included in revenues or expenses.

Deferred
revenue represents rental revenue and management fees received prior to the date earned. Deferred revenue also includes rental payments received in excess of rental revenues
recognized as a result of straight-line basis accounting.

Other
income includes fees paid by tenants to terminate their leases, which are recognized when fees due are determinable, no further actions or services are required to be performed by
us, and collectability is reasonably assured. In the event of early termination, the unrecoverable net book values of the assets or liabilities related to the terminated lease are recognized as
depreciation and amortization expense in the period of termination.

We
recognize sales of real estate properties only upon closing, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate." Payments received from purchasers prior to
closing are recorded as deposits. Profit on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the sale price is reasonable assured and we are not
obligated to perform significant activities after the sale. Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of profit recognition on sale of real estate under SFAS
No. 66.



Interest income on debt investments is recognized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method and recognized on
the accrual basis. Fees received in connection with loan commitments are deferred until the loan is funded and are then recognized over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
Anticipated exit fees, whose collection is expected, are also recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield. Fees on commitments that expire unused are recognized at expiration. Fees
received in exchange for the credit enhancement of another lender, either subordinate or senior to us, in the form of a guarantee are recognized over the term of that guarantee using the
straight-line method.

Income
recognition is generally suspended for debt investments at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in our opinion, a full recovery of
income and principal

81

---



becomes
doubtful. Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed.

We
designate loans as non-performing at such time as: (1) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or (2) the loan has a maturity default. All
non-performing loans are placed on non-accrual status and income is recognized only upon actual cash receipt. At June 30, 2009, we had eight first mortgage loans with an
aggregate carrying value of $123,951, one mezzanine loan with a carrying value of $0, one second lien of loan with a carrying value of $0 and one third lien loan with a carrying value of $0, which
were classified as non-performing loans. At December 31, 2008, we had three first mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $164,809, one second lien loan with a carrying
value of $0 and one third lien loan with a carrying value of $0, which were classified as non-performing loans.

We
classify loans as sub-performing if they are not performing in material accordance with their terms, but they do not qualify as non-performing loans. The
specific facts and circumstances of these loans may cause them to develop into non-performing loans should certain events occur in the normal passage of time, which we consider to be
90 days from the measurement date. At June 30, 2009, thirteen first mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $422,434 and six mezzanine loans with a carrying value of $51,985
were classified as sub-performing. At December 31, 2008, five first mortgage loans with a carrying value of $216,597 were classified as sub-performing loans.

Reserve for Possible Loan Losses

Specific valuation allowances are established for possible loan losses on loans in instances where it is deemed possible that we may be
unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. We consider the estimated value of the collateral securing the loan, and compare it to the
carrying value of the loan. The estimated value of the collateral is determined by selecting the most appropriate valuation methodology, or methodologies, among several generally available and
accepted in the commercial real estate industry. The determination of the most appropriate valuation methodology is based on the key characteristics of the collateral type, collateral location,
quality and prospects of the sponsor, the amount and status of any senior debt, and other factors. These methodologies include the evaluation of operating cash flow from the property during the
projected holding period, and the estimated sales value of the collateral computed by applying an expected capitalization rate to the stabilized net operating income of the specific property, less
selling costs, all of which are discounted at market discount rates. Because the determination of estimated value is based upon projections of future economic events, which are
inherently subjective, amounts ultimately realized from loans and investments may differ materially from the carrying value at the balance sheet date.

If,
upon completion of the valuation, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created
with a corresponding charge to the provision for possible loan losses. The allowance for each loan is maintained at a level we believe is adequate to absorb possible losses. Impairment losses are
recognized as a direct write-down of the loan investment with a corresponding charge-off to the allowance. As of June 30, 2009, we incurred charge offs totaling $31,771
relating to realized losses on seven loans. We maintained a reserve for possible loan losses of $277,404 against 19 separate investments with a carrying value of $570,946 as of June 30, 2009
and a reserve for possible loan loses of $88,992 against 13 separate investments with a carrying value of $424,177 as of December 31, 2008.

Rent Expense

Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are due. Accrued expenses and other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 includes an accrual for rental expense recognized in excess of amounts due at that

82

---



time.
Rent expense related to leasehold interests is included in property operating expenses, and rent expense related to office rentals is included in marketing, general and administrative expense.

Stock Based Compensation Plans

We have a stock-based compensation plan, described more fully in Note 14. We account for this plan using the fair value
recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment, a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."

The
Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our plan has characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options and because
changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in our opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of
our stock options.

Prior
to amending and restating the management agreement in October 2008, which was subsequently terminated in April 2009 employees of the Manager who provided services to us pursuant to
the then-existing management agreement were characterized as co-leased employees. Stock option awards granted to such persons under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan were valued
at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which value was amortized over the option vesting period. The amended management agreement that we executed in October 2008 resulted
in the re-characterization of such employees of the Manager, and they are no longer classified as our co-leased employees. Consequently, we determined fair value of the stock
options granted to such persons using a mark-to-market model until April 2009 when we completed the internalization of management through the direct acquisition of the Manager.
Stock option awards were re-valued at the date of the internalization and will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the award for employees that remained with the Manager.

Compensation
cost for stock options, if any, is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the award. Our policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing
market price of our stock on the business day preceding the grant date. Awards of stock or restricted stock are expensed as compensation on a current basis over the benefit period.

The
fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant for options issued to employees, and quarterly for options issued to non-employees, using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2009 and 2008.

2009

2008Dividend yield


14.0%


9.0%Expected life of option


5.0 years


6.0 yearsRisk-free interest rate


1.72%


2.97%Expected stock price volatility


90.0%


67.0%


Incentive Distribution (Class B Limited Partner Interest)

Prior to the internalization, the Class B limited partner interests were entitled to receive an incentive return equal to 25% of
the amount by which funds from operations, or FFO, plus certain accounting gains (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) exceed the product of our weighted average
stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5% (divided by four to adjust for quarterly calculations). We recorded any distributions on
the Class B limited partner interests as an incentive distribution expense in the period when earned and when payment of such amounts became probable and reasonably

83

---



estimable
in accordance with the partnership agreement. These cash distributions reduced the amount of cash available for distribution to our common unit holders in our Operating Partnership and to
our common stockholders. In October 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with the Class B limited partners to waive the incentive distribution that would have otherwise been could be paid,
at our option, in cash or shares of common stock. In December 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL
Green transferred 1.9 million shares of our common stock to us, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that the holders of the Class B limited partner interests may have had
to our Operating Partnership, and our Operating Partnership may have had to the holders, each in accordance with the amended operating partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership, in respect of
the recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of the 2008 calendar year. No incentive distribution was earned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. We incurred approximately $2,604 and $5,100 with respect to incentive distributions on such Class B limited partner interests for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008. In April 2009, we completed the internalization of management through the direct acquisition of the Manager. Accordingly, beginning in May 2009, management and incentive fees payable by us to
the Manager ceased and we now own all of the Class B limited partner interests (which have been cancelled) and all of the interests in the Manager.

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, we use a variety of derivative instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. We require that
hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. This effectiveness is essential for qualifying for hedge accounting. We use a
variety of commonly used derivative products that are considered "plain vanilla" derivatives. These derivatives typically include interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors. We expressly prohibit
the use of unconventional derivative instruments and using derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial
institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.

To
determine the fair value of derivative instruments, we use a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. For
the majority of financial instruments including most derivatives, long-term investments and long-term debt, standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash
flow analysis, option-pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost are used to determine fair value. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such
value may never actually be realized. We adopted FASB Statement No. 157, or SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which among other things requires additional disclosures about
financial instruments carried at fair value and establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair
value. For additional information regarding our implementation of FAS 157, see item 8footnote 2-significant accounting polices.

In
the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes and limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including
the use of derivatives. To address exposure to interest rates, we use derivatives primarily to hedge cash flow variability caused by interest rate fluctuations of our liabilities. Each of our CDOs
maintain a minimum amount of allowable unhedged interest rate risk. The 2005 CDO permits 20% of the net outstanding principal balance and the 2006 CDO and the 2007 CDO permit 5% of the net outstanding
principal balance to be unhedged.

84

---



FASB No. 133, or SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended by FASB No. 149, requires us to recognize all derivatives
on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 133 may increase or decrease
reported net income and stockholders' equity prospectively, depending on future levels of LIBOR, swap spreads and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items,
but will have no effect on cash flows, provided the contract is carried through to full term.

All
hedges held by us are deemed effective based upon the hedging objectives established by our corporate policy governing interest rate risk management. The effect of our derivative
instruments on our financial statements is discussed more fully in Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Taxes

We elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, beginning with our taxable year
ended December 31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable
income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and we will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially
adversely affect our net income and net cash available for
distributions to stockholders. However, we believe that we will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and we intend to operate in the foreseeable future in
such a manner so that we will qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We may, however, be subject to certain state and local taxes.

For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $134 and $2,401 and $0 and $11 of income tax expense, respectively. Included in tax expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 is $2,100 of state income taxes on the gain of extinguishment of debt of $107,229. Under federal tax law, we are allowed to defer this gain until 2014, however, as
not all states follow this federal rule, we have recorded a tax recorded a tax provision equal to the state exposure.

85

---



Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2009 to the three months ended June 30, 2008



2009

2008

$ ChangeRental revenue

$
83,298

$
73,286

$
10,012Investment income


44,869


63,003


(18,134
)Operating expense reimbursement


29,097


29,595


(498
)Gain on sales and other income


1,245


5,029


(3,784
)Total revenues

$
158,509

$
170,913

$
(12,404
)Equity in net income of joint ventures

$
1,975

$
1,729

$
246Gain on extinguishment of debt





17,597


(17,597
)


Rental
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily comprised of revenue earned on our portfolio of 933 properties owned in our Gramercy Realty division. The
increase in rental revenue of $10,012 is primarily due to higher non-cash market lease amortization reflecting the impact of purchase price allocation adjustments finalized in the first
quarter of 2009.

Investment
income is generated on our whole loans, subordinate interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity interests and CMBS. For the three months ended June 30,
2009, $5,944 was earned on fixed rate investments while the remaining $38,925 was earned on floating rate investments. The decrease of $18,134 over the prior period is primarily due to an increase in
non-performing loans to $123,951 at June 30, 2009, the suspension of interest income accruals on certain payment-in-kind loans, a decrease in a size of our
portfolio of loans and other leading instruments by approximately $356,616 and, a decline in LIBOR interest rates in 2009 compared to 2008.

Operating
expense reimbursement of $29,097 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $498 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to lower
operating expenses.

Gains
on sales and other income of $1,254 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily composed of interest on restricted cash balances in our three CDOs and other cash
balances held by us.

The
income on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures of $1,975 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 represents our proportionate share of the income generated by our
joint venture interests including $1,115 of real estate-related depreciation and amortization, which when added back, results in a contribution to Funds from Operations, or FFO, of $3,090. The income
on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures of $1,729 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 represents our proportionate share of income generated by our joint venture interests
including $179 of real estate-related depreciation and amortization, which when added back, results in a contribution to FFO of $1,908. Our use of FFO as an important non-GAAP financial
measure is discussed in more detail below.

During
the three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased at a discount, investment grade notes issued by our three CDOs, generating net gains on early extinguishment of debt of
$17,597. There were no repurchases during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

86

---





2009

2008

$ ChangeProperty operating expenses

$
42,948

$
44,074

$
(1,126
)Interest expense


58,237


74,414


(16,177
)Management fees


2,115


9,106


(6,991
)Incentive fee





2,604


(2,604
)Depreciation and amortization


30,039


20,234


9,805Impairment on loans held for sale


41,951





41,951Marketing, general and administrative


9,552


4,070


5,482Provision for loan loss


167,412


23,214


144,198Total expenses

$
352,254

$
177,716

$
174,538


Property
operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $1,126 from the $44,074 recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2008 to $42,948 recorded
in the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease primarily reflects lower utility and other property operating costs compared to the prior period.

Interest
expense was $58,237 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $74,414 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease of $16,177 is primarily
attributed to reductions in the interest rate indexes, primarily LIBOR-based, charged on our variable rate debt over the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, as well as lower average principal balances outstanding over the same periods, primarily due to the extinguishment of the Company's unsecured line of credit.

Management
fees decreased $6,991 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to $2,115 compared to $9,106 for the same period in 2008 due primarily to the internalization of the
Manager. On April 24, 2009, we completed the internalization of our management. The internalization was completed through a direct acquisition of the Manager, which was previously a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. Upon completion of the internalization, all management fees and incentive management fees payable by us to the Manager were eliminated.

No
incentive distribution was earned for the three months ended June 30, 2009. We recorded an incentive fee expense of $2,604 during the three months ended June 30, 2008 in
accordance with requirements of the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership which entitled owners of Class B limited partner interests in our Operating Partnership to an incentive
return equal to 25% of the amount by which FFO plus certain accounting gains (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) exceed the product of our weighted average
stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5% (divided by four to adjust for quarterly calculations).

We
recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of $30,039 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $20,234 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The
increase of $9,805 is primarily due to higher amortization expense on in-place lease intangible assets reflecting the impact of purchase price allocation adjustments finalized in the first
quarter of 2009.

During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded impairment charges totaling $41,951 on six loans classified as held for sale. Impairment charges were taken to reduce the
carrying value of loans held for sale to their fair value based upon anticipated selling prices.

Marketing,
general and administrative expenses were $9,552 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $4,070 for the same period in 2008. The increase of $5,482
includes $2,184 of expense for costs incurred in connection with the internalization of the Manager. FASB Statement No. 141 (revised), "Business Combinations," or SFAS No. 141(R),
requires among other things, that

87

---



acquisition
costs be expensed in the period incurred. The increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses also reflects salaries, benefits and other administrative costs incurred by the
Manager since April 24, 2009, the date we completed the internalization of our management. These costs were previously borne by the Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green.

Provision
for loan losses was $167,412 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $23,214 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $144,198. The
provision was based upon an increase in non-performing and sub-performing loans, periodic credit reviews of our loan portfolio, and reflects the challenging economic
conditions, severe illiquidity in the capital markets, and a difficult operating environment.

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30, 2008



2009

2008

$ ChangeRental revenue

$
162,750

$
76,985

$
85,765Investment income


97,725


137,598


(39,873
)Operating expense reimbursement


59,022


29,595


29,427Gain on sales and other income


2,515


9,327


(6,812
)Total revenues

$
322,012

$
253,505

$
68,507Equity in net income of joint ventures

$
4,187

$
5,195

$
(1,008
)Gain on extinguishment of debt

$
107,229

$
21,096

$
86,133


Rental
revenue of $162,750 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily comprised of revenue earned on properties acquired as a result of the American Financial
acquisition. Rental revenue is included in income beginning on the date of acquisition. Accordingly, rental revenue of $76,985 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 only includes rental
revenue from the American Financial acquisition beginning April 1, 2008, the closing date of the transaction.

Investment
income is generated on our whole loans, subordinate interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity interests and CMBS. For the three months ended June 30,
2009, $15,802 was earned on fixed rate investments while the remaining $81,923 was earned on floating rate investments. The decrease of $39,873 over the prior period is primarily due to an increase in
non-performing and sub-performing loans to $123,951 at June 30, 2009, the suspension of interest income accruals on certain payment-in-kind
loans, a decrease in the size of our portfolio of loans and other lending instruments by approximately $356,616 and, a decline in LIBOR interest rates in 2009 compared to 2008.

Operating
expense reimbursement of $59,022 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is attributable to the portfolio of operating real estate acquired in the American Financial
acquisition. Operating expense reimbursement is included in income beginning on the date of acquisition. Accordingly, operating expense reimbursement of $29,595 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 only includes revenue from the American Financial acquisition beginning April 1, 2008, the closing date of the transaction.

Gains
on sales and other income totaled $2,515 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $9,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $6,812. Gains
on sales and other income is primarily composed of interest on restricted cash balances in our three CDOs and other cash balances held by us.

The
income on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures of $4,187 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 represents our proportionate share of the income generated by our joint
venture interests

88

---



including
$2,288 of real estate-related depreciation and amortization, which when added back, results in a contribution to FFO of $6,475. The income on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures of
$5,195 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 represents our proportionate share of income generated by our joint venture interests including $365 of real estate-related depreciation and
amortization, which when added back, results in a contribution to FFO of $5,560. Our use of FFO as an important non-GAAP financial measure is discussed in more detail below.

In
March 2009, we entered into an amendment and compromise agreement with KeyBank, National Association, or Key Bank, to settle and satisfy the existing loan obligations under the
$175,000 unsecured facility at a discount for a cash payment of $45,000 and a maximum amount of up to $15,000 from 50% of all payments from distributions after May 2009 from certain junior tranches
and preferred classes of securities under our CDOs. We recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $107,229 as a result of this agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we
repurchased at a discount, investment grade notes issued by our three CDOs, generating net gains on early extinguishment of debt of $21,096.



2009

2008

$ ChangeProperty operating expenses

$
88,185

$
44,074

$
44,111Interest expense


123,511


115,857


7,654Management fees


7,787


16,251


(8,464
)Incentive fee





5,100


(5,100
)Depreciation and amortization


57,458


22,064


35,394Impairment on loans held for sale


126,379





126,379Marketing, general and administrative


18,335


6,875


11,460Provision for loan loss


220,183


31,214


188,969Total expenses

$
641,838

$
241,435

$
400,403


Property
operating expenses of $88,185 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is attributed to the portfolio of operating real estate acquired in the American Financial
acquisition. Property operating expenses are included in expenses beginning on the date of acquisition. Accordingly, property operating
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $44,074 only include expenses from the American Financial acquisition beginning April 1, 2008, the closing date of the transaction.

Interest
expense was $123,511 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $115,857 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase of $7,654 is primarily
attributed to the $2,500,000 of additional debt incurred as a result of the American Financial acquisition. This was partially offset by reductions in the interest rate indexes, primarily LIBOR-based,
charged on our variable rate debt over the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, and the extinguishment of our unsecured line of credit on
March 31, 2009.

Management
fees decreased $8,464 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $7,787 compared to $16,251 for the same period in 2008 due primarily to an amendment to the amended
management agreement executed in October of 2008 that reduced or eliminated certain management fee expenses. Additionally, on April 24, 2009, we completed the internalization of our management.
The internalization was completed through a direct acquisition of the Manager, which was previously a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. Upon completion of the internalization, all management fees
and incentive management fees payable by us to the Manager were eliminated.

No
incentive distribution was earned for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We recorded an incentive fee expense of $5,100 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 in
accordance with requirements of the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership which entitled owners of

89

---



Class B
limited partner interests in our Operating Partnership to an incentive return equal to 25% of the amount by which FFO plus certain accounting gains (as defined in the partnership
agreement of our Operating Partnership) exceed the product of our weighted average stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5%
(divided by four to adjust for quarterly calculations).

We
recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of $57,458 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase of $35,394 compared to the comparable period in the prior year
is primarily attributable to the portfolio of operating real estate acquired in the American Financial acquisition. Depreciation and amortization is included in expense beginning on the date of
acquisition. Accordingly, depreciation and amortization of $22,064 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 only includes expense from the American Financial acquisition beginning April 1,
2008, the closing date of the transaction.

During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded impairment charges totaling $126,379 on 13 loans classified as held for sale. Impairment charges were taken to reduce the
value of loans held for sale to their fair value based upon anticipated selling prices.

Marketing,
general and administrative expenses were $18,335 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $6,875 for the same period in 2008. The increase of $11,460
primarily reflects $5,010 of expense for costs incurred in connection with the internalization of the Manager. SFAS No. 141(R) requires, among other things, that acquisition costs be expensed
in the period incurred. The change in marketing, general and administrative expense also includes higher legal and professional fees during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in the prior year.

Provision
for loan losses was $220,183 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $31,214 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $188,969. The
provision was based upon an increase in non-performing loans; periodic credit reviews of our loan portfolio, and reflects the challenging economic conditions, severe illiquidity in the
capital markets, and a difficult operating environment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measurement of the ability to meet cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and
maintain loans and other investments, pay dividends and other general business needs. In addition to cash on hand, our primary sources of funds for short-term liquidity requirements,
including working capital, distributions, if any, debt service and additional investments, if any, consist of: (i) cash flow from operations; (ii) proceeds from our existing CDOs;
(iii) proceeds from principal and interest payments and rents on our investments; (iv) proceeds from potential loan and asset sales; and, to a lesser extent; (v) new financing or
additional securitizations or CDO offerings; and (vi) proceeds from additional common or preferred equity offerings. We believe these sources of financing will be sufficient to meet our
short-term liquidity requirements. Due to the continued market turbulence, we do not anticipate having the ability in the near-term to access equity or debt capital through new
warehouse lines, CDO issuances, term or credit facilities or trust preferred issuances, although we continue to explore capital raising options. Therefore, we will rely primarily on cash on hand, cash
flows from operations, principal and interest payments on our investments, and proceeds from asset and loan sales to satisfy our liquidity requirements. If we (i) are unable to renew, replace
or expand our sources of financing, (ii) are unable to execute asset and loan sales in a timely manner or to receive anticipated proceeds from them or (iii) fully utilize available cash,
it may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Our
ability to fund our short-term liquidity needs, including debt service and general operations (included employment related benefit expenses), through cash flow from
operations can be evaluated through the consolidated statement of cash flows provided in our financial statements. However, the net cash from operations or net cash used in operations disclosed on the
statement of cash flows

90

---



should
be adjusted to exclude the effect of loans originated for sale and the proceeds of loans sold during any respective reporting period. These activities are included in cash flow from operations
in accordance with GAAP, but constitute an integral part of our investment activity. Consequently, net cash flow from operations is not necessarily reflective of our true recurring operating
activities and our ability to fund our required distributions to stockholders and other liquidity requirements through our operating activities.

Further,
our short-term liquidity requirements could be affected by a potential change in our dividend policy. Beginning with the third quarter of 2008 our board of directors
elected not to pay a dividend to common stockholders, which for the second quarter of 2008 was $0.63 per share. Additionally our board of directors elected not to pay the Series A preferred
stock dividend of $0.50781 per share beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we accrued $6,981 and $2,325, respectively, for the preferred
stock dividends. In January 2009, we exchanged our $150,000 of trust preferred securities for a new $150,000 junior subordinated debenture. As part of such transaction, we agreed that we will not make
any distributions on, or repurchases of, our common stock or preferred stock for all of 2009. Our board of directors will revisit our dividend policy in 2010.

Our
ability to meet our long-term liquidity and capital resource requirements will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing and equity capital. Our inability to
renew, replace or expand our sources of financing on substantially similar terms, or any at all may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any indebtedness we incur will
likely be subject to continuing or more restrictive covenants and we will likely be required to make continuing representations and warranties in connection with such debt.

Our
current and future borrowings may require us, among other restrictive covenants to keep uninvested cash on hand to maintain a certain portion of our assets free from liens and to
secure such borrowings without assets. These conditions could limit our ability to do further borrowings. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2009. If we are unable to
make required payments under such borrowings, breach any representation or warranty in the loan documents or violate any covenant contained in a loan document lenders may accelerate the maturity of
our debt. If we are unable to retire our borrowings in such a situation, (i) we may need to prematurely sell the assets securing such debt, (ii) the lenders could accelerate the debt and
foreclose on our assets that pledged as collateral to such lenders, (iii) such lenders could force us into bankruptcy, (iv) such lenders could force us to take other actions to protect
the value of their collateral and/or (v) our other debt financings could become immediately due and payable. Any such event would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, the value of
our common stock, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and our ability to continue as a going concern.

The
majority of our loan and other investments are pledged as collateral for our CDO bonds and the income generated from these investments is used to fund interest obligations of our CDO
bonds and the remaining income, if any, is retained by us. Our CDO bonds contain interest coverage and asset over-collateralization covenants that must be met in order for us to receive
interest and other payments from the CDOs. If we fail these covenants in any of our CDOs, all cash flows from the applicable CDO, other than senior collateral management fees, will be diverted to
repay principal and interest on the outstanding senior CDO bonds, and, until covenant compliance is reestablished, we will not receive any interest, equity or subordinate management fee payments from
the applicable CDO. While we were in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2009, our compliance margin was narrow and relatively small declines in our performance and credit metrics
could cause us to fall out of compliance in the future, with a corresponding loss of cash flow. In the event of a breach of our CDO covenants that we could not cure in the near term, we would be
required to fund our non-CDO expenses, including management fees, debt coverage, interest on our unsecured junior subordinated notes, or our Junior Notes, and other expenses with
(i) cash on hand, (ii) income from any CDO not in

91

---



default,
(iii) income from our real property and unencumbered loan assets, (iv) sale of assets, (v) or accessing the equity or debt capital markets, if available. While we have
the right to cure CDO covenant compliance defaults, which would resume normal payments to us, we may not have sufficient liquidity available to do so at such time.

To
maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income. This distribution requirement limits our ability
to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital for operations. We may elect to pay dividends on our common stock in cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock as permitted
under U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT distribution requirements.

Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $11,983 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $76,476 for same period in 2008, a decrease of $64,493. Operating cash flow is generated primarily by net interest income from our commercial real estate finance segment and
net rental income from our property investment segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, lower net investment income from our commercial finance
segment was offset by net rental income generated by our property investment segment. The decrease in operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008 primarily reflects changes in working capital items, primarily other assets and deferred revenue which include the impact of annual rent income and debt service payments made on the Dana
portfolio.

Net
cash provided in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $805 compared to cash used by investing activities of $544,406 during the same period in 2008,
a decrease in cash used of $545,211. This decline in cash used in investing activities primarily reflects the impact of cash paid for the acquisition of American Financial of $586,825 during the six
months ended June 30, 2008. Other changes in cash used in investing activities reflect the impact of the generalized credit market dislocations which have continued since 2008 and the resulting
affect on our investing activities.

Net
cash used in financing activities totaled $62,006 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $230,005 in the six months ended
June 30, 2008. The increase in cash used for financing activities primarily reflects the extinguishment of our unsecured credit facility, a decrease in restricted cash in connection with
financing investments in our CDOs and mortgage repayments and amortization. This was partially offset by the suspension of dividend payments on our common and preferred stock, and lower net repayments
on our repurchase facilities.

Capitalization

Our authorized capital stock consists of 125,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value, of which we have authorized the issuance of up to
100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2009, 49,848,333 shares of common stock and
4,600,000 shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock

In April 2007, we issued 4,600,000 shares of our 8.125% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock (including the
underwriters' over-allotment option of 600,000 shares) with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. Holders of the Series A cumulative redeemable preferred shares
are entitled to receive annual dividends of $2.03125 per share on a quarterly basis and dividends are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. On or after April 18, 2012, we may at our option
redeem the Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock at par for cash. Net proceeds (after deducting underwriting fees and expenses) from the offering were approximately $111,205. Beginning
with the fourth quarter of 2008, our board of directors elected not to pay the quarterly Series A preferred stock

92

---



dividend
of $0.50781 per share. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we accrued preferred stock dividends of $6,981 and $ 2,325, respectively. Covenants in our Junior Notes restrict
our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock and Series A preferred stock during the calendar year 2009.

Common Stock

In April 2008, we issued approximately 15,634,854 shares of common stock in connection with the American Financial acquisition. These
shares had a value of approximately $378,672 on the date the merger agreement was executed. Also as a result of the American Financial acquisition, an affiliate of SL Green was granted 644,787 shares
of common stock for services rendered, subject to a one-year vesting period. These shares had a value of approximately $11,213 on the date of issuance. Subsequent to the issuance, SL Green
OP owned approximately 15.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

In
December 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL Green transferred to us,
1.9 million shares of our common stock, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that the holders of the Class B limited partner interests may have had to our Operating
Partnership, and our Operating Partnership may have had to the holders, each in accordance with the amended operating partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership, in respect of the
recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of the 2008 calendar year. The shares of common stock were cancelled upon receipt by us. Subsequent to the letter agreement, SL Green
OP owned approximately 12.5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Outperformance Plan

In June 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved a long-term incentive compensation program, the
2005 Outperformance Plan. Participants in the 2005 Outperformance Plan, were to share in a "performance pool" if our total return to stockholders for the period from June 1, 2005 through
May 31, 2008 exceeded a cumulative total return to stockholders of 30% during the measurement period over a base share price of $20.21 per share. We recorded the expense of the LTIP Units of
our Operating Partnership, or the LTIP Units, award in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123(R). Compensation expense of $308 and $617 was recorded for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, related to the 2005 Outperformance Plan. Based on our total return to stockholders as of the May 31, 2008 measurement period conclusion date, we did not meet
the minimum 30% return threshold and accordingly, the plan participants automatically forfeited the LTIP Units that they had been granted and the 2005 Outperformance Plan expired as of that date.

Deferred Stock Compensation Plan for Directors

Under our Independent Director's Deferral Program, which commenced April 2005, our independent directors may elect to defer up to 100%
of their annual retainer fee, chairman fees and meeting fees. Unless otherwise elected by a participant, fees deferred under the program shall be credited in the form of phantom stock units. The
phantom stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon such directors' termination of service from the Board of Directors or a change in control by us, as defined by
the program. Phantom stock units are credited to each independent director quarterly using the closing price of our common stock on the applicable dividend record date for the respective quarter. Each
participating independent director who elects to receive fees in the form of phantom stock units has the option to have their account credited for an equivalent amount of phantom stock units based on
the dividend rate for each quarter or have dividends paid in cash.

93

---



As
of June 30, 2009, there were approximately 210,694 phantom stock units outstanding, of which 198,694 units are vested.

Market Capitalization

At June 30, 2009, our CDOs and borrowings under our term loan, credit facility, repurchase facility, junior subordinated notes,
and mortgage loans (including the Goldman Mortgage and Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loans), represented 97% of our consolidated market capitalization of $5.5 billion (based on a common stock
price of $1.61 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009). Market capitalization includes our consolidated debt and common and preferred
stock.

Indebtedness

The table below summarizes secured and other debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, including our junior
subordinated debentures and excluding debt related to assets held for sale:

June 30,
2009

December 31,
2008Mortgage notes payable

$
1,763,690

$
1,833,005Mezzanine notes payable


569,122


580,462Unsecured credit facility





172,301Term loan, credit facility and repurchase facility


64,976


95,897Collateralized debt obligations


2,608,175


2,608,065Junior subordinated notes


150,000


Junior subordinated debentures





150,000Total


5,155,963

$
5,439,730Cost of debt


LIBOR+2.44
%

LIBOR+2.54
%


Term Loan, Credit Facility and Repurchase Facility

The facility with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC or one or more of its affiliates, or Wachovia, was initially established as a
$250,000 facility in 2004, and was subsequently increased to $500,000 effective April 2005. In July 2008, the original facility was terminated and a new credit facility was executed to provide for a
total credit availability of $215,680, comprised of a term loan equal to $115,680 and a revolving credit facility equal to $100,000 with a credit spread of 242.5 basis points (which would have been
increased to 267.5 basis points upon an extension of the maturity of the credit facility). The term of the credit facility was two years and the borrowers were able to extend the term for an
additional twelve-month period if certain conditions are met. Advance rates for assets acquired pursuant to the credit facility varied from 50% to 80% of purchase price, depending on the type and
structure of the asset. In April 2009, we entered into an amendment with Wachovia, pursuant to which the maturity date of the credit facility was extended to June 30, 2011 and the interest rate
remained unchanged. The amendment also eliminated all financial covenants, eliminated Wachovia's right to impose future margin calls, reduced the recourse guarantee to be no more than $10,000, and
eliminated cross default provisions with respect to the our other indebtedness. We made a $13,000 cash deposit and provided other credit support to backstop letters of credit of Wachovia issued in
connection with our mortgage debt obligations of certain of our subsidiaries. We also agreed to attempt to divest of certain loan investments in the future in order to further deleverage the credit
facility and forego additional borrowing under the facility. Borrowings under the Wachovia facility at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were secured by mezzanine loans with a carrying
value of $121,929 and $202,823, respectively. We have accrued no interest and borrowings of $60,637 at a weighted average spread to

94

---



LIBOR
of 2.05% as of June 30, 2009, and no accrued interest and borrowings of $72,254 on the repurchase facility at a weighted average spread to LIBOR of 2.68% as of December 31, 2008.

Our
subsidiaries entered into a repurchase facility with Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, or Goldman. In October 2006 this facility was increased from $200,000 to $400,000 and its
maturity date was extended until September 2009. In August 2008, the facility was amended to reduce the borrowing capacity to $200,000 and to provide for an extension of the maturity to December 2010,
for a fee, provided that no event of default has occurred. The facility bears interest at spreads of 2.00% to 2.30% over one-month LIBOR and provides for advance rates that vary from 65%
to 75% based upon the collateral provided under a borrowing base calculation. The lender has a consent right to the inclusion of investments in this facility, determines periodically the market value
of the investments, and has the right to require additional collateral, a partial repayment of the facility (margin call), or a reduction in unused availability under the facility, sufficient to
rebalance the facility if the estimated market value of the included investments declines. In April 2009, we entered into an amendment to the amended and restated master repurchase agreement and
amended guaranty with Goldman, pursuant to which all financial covenants in the amended and restated master repurchase agreement and the amended guaranty were eliminated and certain other provisions
of the amended and restated master repurchase agreement and the amended guaranty were amended or deleted, including, among other things, the elimination of the existing recourse liability and a
relaxation of certain affirmative and negative covenants. We made a cash payment to Goldman in the amount of
$4,000 to reduce the borrowings under the agreement. Borrowings under the Goldman Repurchase Facility at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were secured by mezzanine loans with a
carrying value of $29,013 and $64,960, respectively. We had accrued interest of $10 and borrowings of $4,339 at a weighted average spread to LIBOR of 2.5% as of June 30, 2009, and no accrued
interest and borrowings of $23,643 at a weighted average spread to LIBOR of 2.5% under this facility at December 31, 2008.

The
Goldman repurchase facility and the Wachovia credit facility require that borrowings under these facilities be repaid as principal payments on the loans and investments pledged to
these facilities are received or as proceeds from the sale of those investments are received. Currently, assets pledged as collateral under these facilities include interests in mezzanine loans.

In
January 2009, we closed a master repurchase facility with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. or JP Morgan, in the amount of $9,500. The term of the facility was through July 23, 2010,
the interest rate was 30-day LIBOR plus 175 basis points, the facility was recourse to us for 30% of this facility amount, and the facility was subject to normal
mark-to-market provisions after March 2009. Proceeds under the facility, which was fully drawn at closing, were used to retire certain borrowings under the Wachovia credit
facility. This facility was secured by a perfected security interest in a single debt investment. In March 2009, we terminated the JP Morgan master repurchase facility by making a cash payment of
approximately $1,880 pursuant to the recourse guarantee and transferring the full ownership and control of, and responsibility for, this related loan collateral to JP Morgan. We recorded an impairment
charge of $8,843 in connection with the collateral transfer.

Unsecured Credit Facility

In May 2006, we closed on a $100,000 senior unsecured revolving credit facility with KeyBank, with an initial term of three years and a
one-year extension option. In June 2007 the facility was increased to $175,000. The facility was supported by a negative pledge of an identified asset base. In March 2009, we entered into
an amendment and compromise agreement with KeyBank to settle and satisfy the loan obligations at a discount for a cash payment of $45,000 and a maximum amount of up to $15,000 from 50% of all payments
from distributions after May 2009 from certain junior tranches and preferred classes of securities under our CDOs. We recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $107,229 as a result of this
agreement. The $15,000 potential cash distribution is recorded in other liabilities on our

95

---



balance
sheet as of June 30, 2009. We had accrued interest of $1,405 and borrowings of $172,301 as of December 31, 2008.

Mortgage Loans

Certain real estate assets are subject to mortgage liens. As of June 30, 2009, 718 of our real estate assets were encumbered
with mortgage and mezzanine loans with a cumulative outstanding balance of $2,367,193. Our mortgage notes payable typically require that specified loan-to-value and debt
service coverage ratios be maintained with respect to the financed properties before we can exercise certain rights under the loan agreements relating to such properties. If the specified criteria are
not satisfied, in addition to other conditions that we may have to observe, our ability to release properties from the financing may be restricted and the lender may be able to "trap" portfolio cash
flow until the required ratios are met on an ongoing basis.

On
June 30, 2009, First States Investors 225, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary ("First States 225"), executed a first amendment of note, deed of trust and other
loan documents (the "Amendment") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee under a pooling and servicing agreement. First States 225 is the borrower under a $52,601 mortgage loan secured by a
Class A high rise office tower located in St. Louis, Missouri, designated as held for sale. The Amendment extends the original maturity of the mortgage from July 1, 2009 to
January 1, 2010. In addition, the Amendment establishes a monthly principal reserve requirement of $90 and implements monthly financial and operational reporting. We paid a 50 basis point
extension fee totaling $263 as well as lender's legal fees to secure the extension.

Goldman Mortgage Loan

On April 1, 2008, certain of our subsidiaries, collectively, the Goldman Loan Borrowers entered into a mortgage loan agreement,
the Goldman Mortgage Loan, with Goldman Sachs Commercial Mortgage Capital, L.P., or GSCMC, Citicorp North America, Inc., or Citicorp, and SL Green in connection with a mortgage loan in
the amount of $250,000, which is secured by certain properties owned or ground leased by the Goldman Loan Borrowers. The Goldman Mortgage Loan matures on March 9, 2010, with a single
one-year extension option. The terms of the Goldman Mortgage Loan were negotiated between the Goldman Borrower and GSCMC and Citicorp. The Goldman Mortgage Loan bore interest at 4.35% over
one-month LIBOR. The Goldman Mortgage Loan provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration of all amounts payable under the Goldman
Mortgage Loan. The Goldman Mortgage Loan allows for prepayment under the terms of the agreement, subject to a 1.00% prepayment fee during the first six months, payable to the lender, as long as
simultaneously therewith a proportionate prepayment of the Goldman Mezzanine Loan (discussed below) shall also be made on such date. In August 2008, an amendment to the loan agreement was entered into
for the Goldman Mortgage Loan in conjunction with the bifurcation of the Goldman Mezzanine loan into two separate mezzanine loans. Under this loan agreement amendment, the Goldman Mortgage Loan bears
interest at 1.99% over LIBOR. We had accrued interest of $247 and borrowings of $241,324 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $367 and borrowings of $242,568 as of December 31,
2008.

Secured Term Loan

On April 1, 2008 First States Group 3300 B, L.P., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, or the PB Loan Borrower,
entered into a loan agreement, the PB Loan Agreement, with PB Capital Corporation, as agent for itself and other lenders, in connection with a secured term loan in the amount of $240,000 or the PB
Loan in part to refinance a portion of a portfolio of American Financial's properties known as the WBBD Portfolio. The PB Loan matures on April 1, 2013 and bears interest at 1.65% over
one-month LIBOR. The PB Loan is secured by mortgages on the 48 properties owned by the PB Loan Borrower and all other assets of the PB Loan Borrower. The PB Loan

96

---



Agreement
provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration of all amounts payable under the PB Loan Agreement. The PB Loan Borrower may prepay the PB
Loan, in whole or in part (in amounts equal to at least $1,000), on any date. We had accrued interest of $394 and borrowings of $238,263 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $657 and
borrowings of $240,000 as of December 31, 2008.

The
PB Loan requires us to enter into an interest rate protection agreement within five days of the tenth consecutive LIBOR banking day on which the strike rate exceeds 6.00% per annum.
The interest rate protection agreement must protect the PB Loan Borrower against upward fluctuations of interest rates in excess of 6.25% per annum.

Certain
of our mortgage notes payable related to assets held for sale contain provisions that require us to compensate the lender for the early repayment of the loan.

The
PB Loan Agreement contains certain semi-annual covenants relating to liquidity and tangible net worth. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the last
testing dates, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Goldman Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loans

On April 1, 2008, certain of our subsidiaries, collectively, the Mezzanine Borrowers, entered into a mezzanine loan agreement
with GSCMC, Citicorp and SL Green in connection with a mezzanine loan in the amount of $600,000, or the Goldman Mezzanine Loan, which is secured by pledges of certain equity interests owned by the
Mezzanine Borrowers and any amounts receivable by the Mezzanine Borrowers whether by way of distributions or other sources. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan matures on March 9, 2010, with a single
one-year extension option. The terms of the Goldman Mezzanine Loan were negotiated between the Mezzanine Borrowers and GSCMC and Citicorp. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan bore interest at 4.35%
over one-month LIBOR. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan provides for customary events of default, the occurrence of which could result in an acceleration of all amounts payable under the Goldman
Mezzanine Loan. The Goldman Mezzanine Loan allows for prepayment under the terms of the agreement, subject to a 1.00% prepayment fee during the first six months, payable to the lender, as long as
simultaneously therewith a proportionate prepayment of the Goldman Mortgage Loan shall also be made on such date. In addition, under certain circumstances the Goldman Mezzanine Loan is cross-
defaulted with events of default under the Goldman Mortgage Loan and with other mortgage loans, pursuant to which an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours is the mortgagor. In August 2008, the
$600,000 mezzanine loan was bifurcated into two separate mezzanine loans (the Junior Mezzanine Loan and the Senior Mezzanine Loan) by the lenders. Additional loan agreement amendments were entered
into for the Goldman Mezzanine Loan and Goldman Mortgage Loan. Under these loan agreement amendments, the Junior Mezzanine Loan bears interest at 6.00% over LIBOR and the Senior Mezzanine Loan bears
interest at 5.20% over LIBOR, and the Goldman Mortgage Loan bears interest at 1.99% over LIBOR. The weighted average of these interest rate spreads is equal to the combined weighted average of the
interest rates spreads on the initial loans. We had accrued interest of $1,430 and borrowings of $569,122 as of June 30, 2009 and accrued interest of $1,821 and borrowings of $580,462 as of
December 31, 2008.

The
Goldman Mezzanine Loan required and the Senior Mezzanine Loan requires an environmental escrow reserve for the remediation of environmental conditions in the combined amount of $850.
Since August 2008, $575 of this reserve was released to the Mezzanine Borrowers, leaving a balance of $275 reserved with the lender as of June 30, 2009. The lender may upon our request disburse
funds from the reserve on a monthly basis for the reimbursement of reasonable costs and expenses incurred to correct the environmental conditions.

97

---



Collateralized Debt Obligations

During 2005 we issued approximately $1,000,000 of CDO bonds through two indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO
2005-1 Ltd., or the 2005 Issuer, and Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2005-1 LLC, or the 2005 Co-Issuer. At issuance the CDO consisted of $810,500 of
investment grade notes, $84,500 of non-investment grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2005 Issuer and the 2005 Co-Issuer, and $105,000 of preferred shares,
which were issued by the 2005 Issuer. The investment grade notes were issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.49%. We incurred approximately
$11,957 of costs related to Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2005-1, which are amortized on a level-yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

During
2006 we issued approximately $1,000,000 of CDO bonds through two newly-formed indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2006-1 Ltd., or the 2006 Issuer,
and Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2006-1 LLC, or the 2006 Co-Issuer. At issuance the CDO consisted of $903,750 of investment grade notes, $38,750 of
non-investment grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2006 Issuer and the 2006 Co-Issuer, and $57,500 of preferred shares, which were issued by the 2006 Issuer.
The investment grade notes were issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.37%. We incurred approximately $11,364 of costs related to Gramercy
Real Estate CDO 2006-1, which are amortized on a level-yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

In
August 2007, we issued $1,100,000 of CDO bonds through two newly-formed indirect subsidiaries, Gramercy Real Estate CDO 2007-1 Ltd., or the 2007 Issuer and Gramercy
Real Estate CDO 2007-1 LLC, or the 2007 Co-Issuer. At issuance the CDO consisted of $1,045,550 of investment grade notes, $22,000 of non-investment grade
notes, which were co-issued by the 2007 Issuer and the 2007 Co-Issuer, and $32,450 of preferred shares, which were issued by the 2007 Issuer. The investment grade notes were
issued with floating rate coupons with a combined weighted average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.46%. We incurred approximately $16,816 of costs related to Gramercy Real Estate CDO
2007-1, which are amortized on a level-yield basis over the average life of the CDO.

We
retained all non-investment grade securities, the preferred shares and the common shares in the Issuer of each CDO. The Issuers and Co-Issuers in each CDO
holds assets, consisting primarily of whole loans, subordinate interests in whole loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments and CMBS, which serve as collateral for the CDO. Each CDO may be
replenished, pursuant to certain rating agency guidelines relating to credit quality and diversification, with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first five years of the CDO.
Thereafter, the CDO securities will be retired in sequential order from senior-most to junior-most as loans are repaid. The financial statements of the Issuer of each CDO are
consolidated in our financial statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non-recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of the investment grade notes
issued in each CDO were used to repay substantially all outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements
and to fund additional investments. Loans and other investments are owned by the Issuers and the Co-Issuers serve as collateral for our CDO bonds, and the income generated from these
investments is used to fund interest obligations of our CDO bonds and the remaining income, if any, is retained by us.

Our
CDO bonds contain interest coverage and asset over-collateralization covenants that must be met in order for us to receive interest and other payments from the CDOs. If
we fail these covenants in any of our CDOs, all cash flows from the applicable CDO, other than senior collateral management fees, will be diverted to repay principal and interest on the outstanding
CDO bonds, and, until covenant compliance is reestablished, we will not receive any interest, equity or subordinate management fee payments from the applicable CDO. While we were in compliance with
all such covenants as of June 30, 2009, our compliance margin was narrow and relatively small declines in our performance and credit metrics could cause us to fall out of compliance in the
future, with a corresponding loss of cash flow.

During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased, at a discount, $37,800 and $51,300 of investment grade notes previously issued by our CDOs, respectively. We
recorded a net gain on the early extinguishment of debt of $17,597 and $21,096 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in connection with the repurchase of notes of such
Issuers.

98

---



Junior Subordinated Notes

In May 2005, August 2005 and January 2006, we completed issuances of $50,000 each in unsecured trust preferred securities through three
Delaware Statutory Trusts, or DSTs, Gramercy Capital Trust I, or GCTI, Gramercy Capital Trust II, or GCTII, and Gramercy Capital Trust III, or GCT III, that were also wholly-owned subsidiaries of our
Operating Partnership. The securities issued in May 2005 bore interest at a fixed rate of 7.57% for the first ten years ending June 2015 and the securities issued in August 2005 bore interest at a
fixed rate of 7.75% for the first ten years ending October 2015. Thereafter the rates were to float based on the three-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The securities issued in January 2006 bore
interest at a fixed rate of 7.65% for the first ten years ending January 2016, with an effective rate of 7.43% when giving effect to the swap arrangement previously entered into in contemplation of
this financing. Thereafter the rate was to float based on the three-month LIBOR plus 270 basis points.

In
January 2009, our Operating Partnership entered into an exchange agreement with the holders of the securities, pursuant to which we and the holders agreed to exchange all of the
previously issued trust preferred securities for our Junior Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000. Our Junior Notes will mature on June 30, 2035, or the Maturity Date, and will
bear (i) a fixed interest rate of 0.50% per annum for the period beginning on January 30, 2009 and ending on January 29, 2012 and (ii) a fixed interest rate of 7.50% per
annum for the period commencing on January 30, 2012 through and including the Maturity Date. We may redeem our Junior Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of our Junior Notes. The optional redemption of our Junior Notes in part must be made in at least $25,000 increments. Our Junior Notes also contain
additional covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to declare or pay any dividends during the calendar year 2009, or make any payment or redeem any debt securities ranked pari passu or
junior to our Junior Notes. In connection with the exchange agreement, the final payment on the trust preferred securities for the period October 30, 2008 through January 29, 2009 was
revised to be at a reduced interest rate of 0.50% per annum.

Contractual Obligations

Combined aggregate principal maturities of our CDOs, Wachovia credit facility and term loan and Goldman repurchase facility, junior
subordinated notes, mortgage loans (including the Goldman Mortgage and Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loans), unfunded loan commitments, and operating leases as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

CDOs

Term Loan,
Credit Facility
and Repurchase
Facilities

Junior
Subordinated
Notes

Mortgage
and
Mezzanine
Loans(1)

Unfunded
Loan(2)
Commitments

Operating
Lease

Total2009

$


$


$


$
13,050

$
19,799

$
9,816

$
42,6652010





4,339





899,302


30,626


19,670


953,9372011





60,637





25,121





19,558


105,3162012











80,285





19,156


99,4412013











621,253





19,030


640,283Thereafter


2,608,175





150,000


728,182





179,858


3,666,215Above/Below Market Interest











18,220








18,220Total

$
2,608,175

$
64,976

$
150,000

$
2,385,413

$
50,425

$
267,088

$
5,526,070


---

99

---



Lease Agreements

Our properties are leased and subleased to tenants under operating leases with expiration dates extending through the year 2031. These
leases generally contain rent increases and renewal options. As of June 30, 2009, we also leased bank branches and office buildings from third parties with expiration dates extending to the
year 2085 and have various ground leases with expiration dates extending through 2087. These lease obligations generally contain rent increases and renewal options.

Future
minimum rental payments under non-cancelable leases, excluding reimbursements for operating expenses, as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

2009 (July 1December 31)

$
138,5122010


263,6382011


206,4312012


189,6202013


178,9252014 and thereafter


1,317,971Total

$
2,295,097


Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

We have several off-balance-sheet investments, including joint ventures and structured finance investments. These
investments all have varying ownership structures. Substantially all of our joint venture arrangements are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we have the ability to exercise
significant influence, but not control over the operating and financial decisions of these joint venture arrangements. Our off-balance-sheet arrangements are discussed in Note 6,
"Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures" in the accompanying financial statements.

Dividends

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must pay annual dividends to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income,
determined before taking into consideration the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains. Before we pay any dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, which would only
be paid out of available cash to the extent permitted under our unsecured and secured credit and repurchase facilities, and our term loans, we must first meet both our operating requirements and
scheduled debt service on our mortgages and loans payable. We may elect to pay dividends on our common stock in cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock as permitted under U.S. federal
income tax laws governing REIT distribution requirements.

Beginning
with the third quarter of 2008 our board of directors elected not to pay a dividend to common stockholders, which for the second quarter of 2008 was $0.63 per share. Our board
of directors also elected not to pay the Series A preferred stock dividend of $0.50781 per share beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, we accrued $6,981 and $2,325 respectively, for preferred stock dividends. Covenants in our Junior Notes restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common and preferred stock during
the calendar year 2009.

Inflation

A majority of our assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence
our performance more so than inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Further, our financial

100

---



statements
are prepared in accordance with GAAP and our distributions are determined by our board of directors based primarily on our net income as calculated for tax purposes, in each case, our
activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical costs or fair market value without considering inflation.

Related Party Transactions

On April 24, 2009, in connection with the internalization, we and our Operating Partnership entered into that certain securities
transfer agreement with SL Green OP, GKK Manager Member Corp or Manager Corp. and SL Green, pursuant to which (i) SL Green OP and Manager Corp. agreed to transfer to our Operating Partnership
membership interests in the Manager and (ii) SL Green OP agreed to transfer to our Operating Partnership its Class B limited partner interests in our Operating Partnership, in exchange
for certain de minimis cash consideration. The securities transfer agreement contains standard representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities. No distributions were due on the Class B
limited partner interests for the period ended June 30, 2009 or otherwise in connection with the internalization.

Concurrently
with the execution of the securities transfer agreement, we also entered into that certain special rights agreement with SL Green OP and SL Green, pursuant to which SL Green
and SL Green OP agreed to provide us certain management information systems services from April 24, 2009 through the date that is 90 days thereafter and we agreed to pay SL Green OP a
monthly cash fee of $25 in connection therewith. We also agreed to use its best efforts to operate as a REIT during each taxable year and to cause our tax counsel to provide legal opinions to SL Green
relating to our REIT status. Other than with respect to the transitional services provisions of the special rights agreement as set forth therein, the special rights agreement will terminate when SL
Green OP ceases to own at least 7.5% of the shares of our common stock.

In
connection with its initial public offering, we entered into a management agreement with the Manager, which was subsequently amended and restated in April 2006. The management
agreement
was further amended in September 2007, amended and restated in October 2008 and was subsequently terminated in connection with the internalization. The management agreement provided for a term through
December 2009 with automatic one-year extension options and was subject to certain termination rights. We paid the Manager an annual management fee equal to 1.75% of our gross stockholders
equity (as defined in the management agreement) inclusive of our trust preferred securities. In October 2008, we entered into the second amended and restated management agreement with the Manager
which generally contained the same terms and conditions as the amended and restated management agreement, as amended, except for the following material changes: (1) reduced the annual base
management fee to 1.50% of the our gross stockholders equity; (2) reduces the termination fee to an amount equal to the management fee earned by the Manager during the 12 months
preceding the termination date; and (3) commencing July 2008, all fees in connection with collateral management agreements were to be remitted by the Manager to us. We incurred expense to the
Manager under this agreement of an aggregate of $2,115 and $7,787 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $9,106 and $16,251 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively.

Prior
to the internalization, to provide an incentive to enhance the value of the our common stock, the holders of the Class B limited partner interests of our Operating
Partnership were entitled to an incentive return equal to 25% of the amount by which FFO plus certain accounting gains and losses (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership)
exceed the product of the weighted average stockholders equity (as defined in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership) multiplied by 9.5% (divided by four to adjust for quarterly
calculations). We recorded any distributions on the Class B limited partner interests as an incentive distribution expense in the period when earned and when payments of such became probable
and reasonably estimable in accordance with the

101

---



partnership
agreement. In October 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with the Class B limited partners to waive the incentive distribution that would have otherwise been earned for the
period July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and provided that starting January 1, 2009, the incentive distribution could have been paid, at our option, in cash or shares of
common stock. In December 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with the Manager and SL Green, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to pay $2,750 in cash and SL Green transferred to us,
1.9 million shares of the our common stock, in full satisfaction of all potential obligations that the holders of the Class B limited partner interests of our Operating Partnership may
have had to our Operating Partnership, and our Operating Partnership may have to the holders, each in accordance with the amended operating partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership, in
respect of the recalculation of the distribution amount to the holders at the end of the 2008 calendar year. We incurred approximately $2,604 and $5,100 with respect to such Class B limited
partner interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

Prior
to the internalization, we were obligated to reimburse the Manager for its costs incurred under an asset servicing agreement between the Manager and an affiliate of SL Green OP and
a separate outsource agreement between the Manager and SL Green OP. The asset servicing agreement, which was amended and restated in April 2006, provided for an annual fee payable to SL Green OP by us
of 0.05% of the book value of all credit tenant lease assets and non-investment grade bonds and 0.15% of the book value of all other assets. The asset servicing fee could have been reduced
by SL Green OP for fees paid directly to outside servicers by us. The outsource agreement provided for an annual fee payable by us, which became $2,814 per year subsequent to the closing of the
American
Financial merger to reflect higher costs resulting from the increased size and number of assets of the combined company, increasing 3% annually over the prior year on the anniversary date of the
outsource agreement in August of each year. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we realized expense of $683 and $1,024, respectively, to the Manager under the outsource agreement.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred expense of $163 and $250, respectively, pursuant to the special servicing agreement. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, we realized expense of $1,365 and $2,676, respectively, to the Manager under the asset servicing agreement. In October 2008, the outsource agreement was terminated and the asset
servicing agreement was replaced with that certain interim asset servicing agreement between the Manager and an affiliate of SL Green, pursuant to which we were obligated to reimburse the Manager for
its costs incurred thereunder from October 2008 until April 24, 2009 when such agreement was terminated in connection with the internalization. Pursuant to that agreement, the SL Green
affiliate acted as the rated special servicer to the our CDOs, for a fee equal to two basis points per year on the carrying value of the specially serviced loans assigned to it. Concurrent with the
internalization, the interim asset servicing agreement was terminated and the Manager entered into a special servicing agreement with an affiliate of SL Green, pursuant to which the SL Green affiliate
agreed to act as the rated special servicer to the our CDOs for a period beginning on April 24, 2009 through the date that is the earlier of (i) 60 days thereafter and
(ii) a date on which a new special servicing agreement is entered into between the Manager and a rated third-party special servicer. The SL Green affiliate will be entitled to a servicing fee
equal to (i) 25 basis points per year on the outstanding principal balance of assets with respect to certain specially serviced assets and (ii) two basis points per year on the
outstanding principal balance of assets with respect to certain other assets. The April 24, 2009 agreement was terminated effective June 23, 2009; however we previously entered into the
new special servicing arrangements with SitusServe, L.P., which became the rated special servicer for the our CDOs. An affiliate of SL Green continues to provide special servicing services with
respect to a limited number of loans owned by us that are secured by properties in New York City, or in which we and SL Green are co-investors.

On
October 27, 2008, we entered into a services agreement with SL Green and SL Green OP which was subsequently terminated in connection with the internalization. Pursuant to the
services

102

---



agreement,
SL Green agreed to provide consulting and other services to us. SL Green would make Marc Holliday, Andrew Mathias and David Schonbraun available in connection with the provision of the
services until the earliest of (i) September 30, 2009, (ii) the termination of the management agreement or (iii) with respect to a particular executive, the termination of
any such executive's employment with SL Green. In consideration for the consulting services, we paid a fee to SL Green of $200 per month, payable, at its option, in cash or, if permissible under
applicable law or the requirements of the exchange on which the shares of our common stock trade, shares of its common stock. SL Green also provided us with certain other services described in the
services agreement for a fee of $100 per month in cash and for a period terminating at the earlier of (i) three months after the date of the services agreement, subject to a
one-time 30-day extension, or (ii) the termination of the management agreement. By a separate agreement and a separate fee, SL Green and SL Green OP agreed to perform
special services activities for us through one of their noted special servicing affiliates for a period beginning on April 24, 2009 through the date that is the earlier of (i) 60 days
thereafter or (ii) a date on which a new special services agreement is entered into between the Manager and a rated third-party servicer. The April 24, 2009 agreement was terminated
effective June 23, 2009; however we previously entered into the new special servicing arrangements with SitusServe, L.P., which became the rated special servicer for the our CDOs. An
affiliate of SL Green
continues to provide special servicing services with respect to a limited number of loans owned by us that are secured by properties in New York City, or in which we and SL Green are
co-investors.

In
connection with the closing of our first CDO in July 2005, the 2005 Issuer, entered into a collateral management agreement with the Manager. Pursuant to the collateral management
agreement, the Manager has agreed to provide certain advisory and administrative services in relation to the collateral debt securities and other eligible investments securing the CDO notes. The
collateral management agreement provides for a senior collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum
of the net outstanding portfolio balance, and a subordinate collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.25% per
annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance. Net outstanding portfolio balance is the sum of the (i) aggregate principal balance of the collateral debt securities, excluding defaulted
securities, (ii) aggregate principal balance of all principal proceeds held as cash and eligible investments in certain accounts, and (iii) with respect to the defaulted securities, the
calculation amount of such defaulted securities. As compensation for the performance of its obligations as collateral manager under our 2005 CDO, our board of directors had allocated to the Manager
the subordinate collateral management fee paid on the CDO notes not held by us. In October 2008, pursuant to the second amended and restated management agreement, the Manager had, commencing
July 1, 2008, agreed to remit this amount to us. At June 30, 2009, we owned all of the non-investment grade bonds, preferred equity and equity in the 2005 CDO. The senior
collateral management fee and balance of the subordinate collateral management fee is allocated to us. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we realized expense of $512 and $1024,
respectively, to the Manager under such collateral management agreement.

Prior
to the internalization, fees payable in connection with CDOs or other securitization vehicles, except for the 2005 CDO, were governed by the management agreement. Pursuant to the
management agreement, if a collateral manager is retained as part of the formation of a CDO or other securitization vehicle, the Manager or an affiliates will be the collateral manager and will
receive the following fees: (i) 0.25% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a managed transitional CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with us or
the Manager, which CDO is structured to own loans secured by transitional properties, (ii) 0.15% per annum of the book value of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a managed
non-transitional CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with us or the Manager, which CDOs structured to own loans secured by non-transitional properties,
(iii) 0.10% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a static CDO that are owned by third-party investors unaffiliated with us or the

103

---



Manager,
which CDO is structured to own non-investment grade bonds, and (iv) 0.05% per annum of the principal amount outstanding of bonds issued by a static CDO that are owned by
third-party investors unaffiliated us or the Manager, which CDO is structured to own investment grade bonds. For the purposes of the management agreement, a "managed transitional" CDO means a CDO that
is actively managed, has a reinvestment period and is structured to own debt collateral secured primarily by non-stabilized real estate assets that are expected to experience substantial
net operating income growth, and a "managed non-transitional" CDO means a CDO that is actively managed, has a reinvestment period and is structured to own debt collateral secured
primarily by stabilized real estate assets that are not expected to experience substantial net operating income growth. Both "managed transitional" and "managed non-transitional" CDOs may
at any given time during the reinvestment period of the respective vehicles invest in and own non-debt collateral (in limited quantity) as defined by the respective indentures. If any fees
are paid to the collateral manager in excess of the fee structure provided for above, such fees are paid to us. In October 2008, pursuant to the second amended and restated management agreement, the
Manager, commencing July 1, 2008, agreed to remit this amount to us. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we realized expense of approximately $571 to the Manager under this
agreement. With respect to the CDO which closed in August, 2007, we realized expense to the Manager of $216 and $432 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

In
connection with the internalization, the management agreement was terminated and the fees payable in connection with our 2006 and 2007 CDOs will be governed by their respective
collateral management agreements. The collateral management agreement for our 2006 CDO provides for a senior collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as
set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance, and a subordinate collateral management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of
payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.25% per annum of the net outstanding portfolio balance. Net outstanding portfolio balance is the sum of the (i) aggregate principal balance of
the collateral debt securities, excluding defaulted securities, (ii) aggregate principal balance of all principal proceeds held as cash and eligible investments in certain accounts, and
(iii) with respect to the defaulted securities, the calculation amount of such defaulted securities. The collateral management agreement for our 2007 CDO provides for a senior collateral
management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to (i) 0.05% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of the CMBS
securities, (ii) 0.10% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of loans, preferred equity securities, cash and certain defaulted securities, and (iii) a subordinate collateral
management fee, payable quarterly in accordance with the priority of payments as set forth in the indenture, equal to 0.15% per annum of the aggregate principal balance of the loans, preferred equity
securities, cash and certain defaulted securities.

Commencing
in May 2005, we are party to a lease agreement with SLG Graybar Sublease LLC, an affiliate of SL Green, for our corporate offices at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New
York. The lease is for approximately 7,300 square feet and carries a term of 10 years with rents of approximately $249 per annum for year one rising to $315 per annum in year ten. We lease
approximately 5,200 additional square feet, on a month-to-month basis pursuant to amendments to the prime lease, for approximately $271 per annum. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we paid $185 and $285 and $62 and $125 under this lease, respectively.

In
July 2005, we closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $40,000 mezzanine loan which bears interest at 11.20%. As part of that sale, the seller retained an
interest-only participation. The mezzanine loan is secured by the equity interests in an office property in New York, New York. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
loan had a book value of $39,400 and $39,520, respectively.

104

---



In
March 2006, we closed on the purchase of a $25,000 mezzanine loan, which bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 8.00%, to a joint venture in which SL Green is an equity
holder. The mezzanine loan was repaid in full on May 9, 2006, when we originated a $90,287 whole loan, which bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75%, to the joint venture. The
whole loan is secured by office and industrial properties in northern New Jersey and had a book value of $86,630 and $90,595 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

In
June 2006, we closed on the acquisition of a 49.75% TIC interest in 55 Corporate Drive, located in Bridgewater, New Jersey with a 0.25% interest to be acquired in the future. The
remaining 50% of the property was owned as a TIC interest by an affiliate of SL Green OP. The property was comprised of three buildings totaling approximately 670,000 square feet which was 100% net
leased to an entity whose obligations were guaranteed by Sanofi-Aventis Group through April 2023. The transaction was valued at $236,000 and was financed with a $190,000, 10-year,
fixed-rate first mortgage loan. In January 2009, we and SL Green sold 100% of the respective interests in 55 Corporate Drive.

In
December 2006, we acquired from a financial institution a pari-passu interest of $125,000 in a $200,000 mezzanine loan, which bears interest at 6.384% and is secured by a
multi-family portfolio in New York, New York. An affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired the remaining $75,000 pari-passu interest in the mezzanine loan. As of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $104,949 and $118,702, respectively.

In
January 2007, we originated two mezzanine loans totaling $200,000. The $150,000 loan was secured by a pledge of cash flow distributions and partial equity interests in a portfolio of
multi-family properties and bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.00%. The $50,000 loan was initially secured by cash flow distributions and partial equity interests in an office
property. On March 8, 2007 the $50,000 loan was increased by $31,000 when the existing mortgage loan on the property was defeased, upon which event our loan became secured by a first mortgage
lien on the property and was reclassified as a whole loan. The whole loan currently bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.00% for the initial funding and one-month LIBOR
plus 1.00% for the subsequent funding. At closing, an affiliate of SL Green acquired from us and held a 15.15% pari-passu interest in the mezzanine loan and the whole loan. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our interest in the whole loan had a carrying value of $62,814 and $66,607, respectively. The investment in the mezzanine loan was repaid in full in
September 2007.

In
April 2007, we purchased for $103,200 a 45% TIC interest to acquire the fee interest in a parcel of land located at 2 Herald Square, located along 34th Street in
New York, New York. The acquisition was financed with a $86,063 10-year fixed rate mortgage loan. The property is subject to a
long-term ground lease with an unaffiliated third party for a term of 70 years. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. The TIC interests are
pari-passu. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $28,712 and $26,118, respectively. We recorded its pro rata share of net income
of $1,250 and $2,513 and $1,250 and $2,752 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In
July 2007, we purchased for $144,240 an investment in a 45% TIC interest to acquire a 79% fee interest and 21% leasehold interest in the fee position in a parcel of land located at
885 Third Avenue, on which is situated The Lipstick Building. The transaction was financed with a $120,443 10-year fixed rate mortgage loan. The property is subject to a
70-year leasehold ground lease with an unaffiliated third party. The remaining TIC interest is owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green. The TIC interests are pari passu. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the investment had a carrying value of $41,020 and $37,070, respectively. We recorded its pro rata share of net income of $1,497and $3,016 and $1,408
and $3,340 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Our
agreements with SL Green in connection with our commercial property investments in 885 Third Avenue and Two Herald Square, contain a buy-sell provision that can be
triggered by us in the

105

---



event
it and SL Green are unable to agree upon a major decision that would materially impair the value of the assets. Such major decisions involve the sale or refinancing of the assets, any extensions
or modifications to the leases with the tenant therein or any material capital expenditures.

In
August 2007, we closed on the purchase from a financial institution of a $12,500 mezzanine loan on a substantially complete residential condominium project in the upper east side of
Manhattan. The investment bore interest at the current pay rate of 11% over LIBOR, and a 19% look-back internal rate of return at maturity. At closing, an affiliate of SL Green
simultaneously acquired a $12,500 pari-passu interest in the same tranche of the capital structure. The loan matured in August 2008 and was retired by a negotiated payoff below par.

In
September 2007, we acquired a 50% interest in a $25,000 senior mezzanine loan from SL Green. Immediately thereafter we, along with SL Green, sold all of its interests in the loan to
an unaffiliated third party. Additionally, we acquired from SL Green a 100% interest in a $25,000 junior mezzanine loan associated with the same properties as the preceding senior mezzanine loan.
Immediately thereafter we participated 50% of its interest in the loan back to SL Green. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan has a book value of $0 and $11,925,
respectively. In October 2007, we acquired a 50% pari-passu interest in $57,795 of two additional tranches in the senior mezzanine loan from an unaffiliated third party. At closing, an
affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired the other 50% pari-passu interest in the two tranches. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the loan had a book value of
$23,193 and $28,026, respectively.

In
November 2007, we acquired from a syndicate comprised of financial institutions a $25,000 interest in a $100,000 junior mezzanine investment secured by a hotel portfolio and franchise
headquarters. An affiliate of SL Green simultaneously acquired and owns another $25,000 interest in the investment. The investment was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an effective spread
to one-month LIBOR of 9.50%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $0 and $15,655, respectively.

In
December 2007, we acquired a $52,000 interest in a senior mezzanine loan from a financial institution. Immediately thereafter we participated 50% of its interest in the loan to an
affiliate of SL Green. The investment, which is secured by a retail property in New York, New York, was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an effective spread to one-month LIBOR
of 5.00%. In July 2009, we sold its remaining interest in the loan to an affiliate of SL Green for $16,120 pursuant to purchase rights established when the loan was acquired. In anticipation of the
sale, we recorded $1,926 of additional impairment charges during the three months ended June 30, 2009. The loan was originally funded under our credit facility with Wachovia, as amended in
April 2009. Accordingly, terms of the sale were subject to approval by Wachovia. The sale includes contingent participation in future net proceeds from SL Green of up to $1,040 in excess of the
purchase price upon their ultimate disposition of the loan. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $15,941 and $24,599, respectively.

In
December 2007, we acquired a 50% interest in a $200,000 senior mezzanine loan from a financial institution. Immediately thereafter we participated 50% of our interest in the loan to
an affiliate of SL Green. The investment was purchased at a discount and bears interest at an effective spread to one-month LIBOR of 6.50%. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of $27,801 and $46,488, respectively.

In
connection with the closing of the acquisition of American Financial, we, as part of a larger financing, received financing of $50,000 from SL Green, which is described more fully in
Note 8. An affiliate SL Green was granted 644,787 shares of common stock for services rendered, subject to a one-year vesting period. These shares had a value of approximately
$11,213 on the date of issuance.

In
August 2008, we closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $9,375 pari-passu participation interest in a $18,750 first mortgage. The loan is secured by a
retail shopping center located in Staten Island, New York. The investment bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.50%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a book value of
$9,256 and $9,324, respectively.

106

---



In September 2008, we closed on the purchase from an SL Green affiliate of a $30,000 interest in a $135,000 mezzanine loan. The loan is secured by the borrower's interests in a retail
condominium located New York, New York. The investment bears interest at an effective spread to one-month LIBOR of 10.00%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan
had a book value of $29,014 and $30,367, respectively.

Funds from Operations

We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe that it is frequently
used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITS. We also use FFO as one of several criteria to determine performance-based incentive compensation for
members of our senior management, which may be payable in cash or equity awards. The revised White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, or NAREIT, in April 2002 defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP, inclusive of the impact of straight line rents), excluding gains (or losses) from items which are
not a recurring part of our business, such as sales of properties, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We
consider gains and losses on the sales of debt investments to be a normal part of our recurring operations and therefore include such gains and losses when arriving at FFO. FFO does not represent cash
generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), as an indication of our financial
performance, or to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it entirely indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs,
including our ability to make cash distributions. Our calculation of FFO may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

FFO
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Six Months EndedJune 30, 2009

June 30, 2008

June 30, 2009

June 30, 2008Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

$
(198,142
)
$
10,060

$
(225,433
)
$
33,194Add:Depreciation and amortization


32,429


25,721


63,128


30,310FFO adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures


1,115


179


2,288


365Less:Non real estate depreciation and amortization


(2,659
)

(3,036
)

(5,648
)

(6,913
)Gain on sale


(1,595
)




(1,954
)

Funds from operations

$
(168,852
)
$
32,924

$
(167,619
)
$
56,956Funds from operations per share-basis

$
(3.39
)
$
0.64

$
(3.36
)
$
1.33Funds from operations per share-diluted

$
(3.39
)
$
0.64

$
(3.36
)
$
1.32


Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking expressions such as "may," "will," "should,"
"expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "project," "continue," or any negative or other variations on such expressions. Forward-looking statements include

107

---



information
concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including any forecasts, projections, plans and objectives for future operations. Although we believe that our plans,
intentions and expectations as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. We
have listed below some important risks, uncertainties and contingencies which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the forward-looking statements
we make in this report. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include, but are not limited to, the following:



108

---





We
assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In evaluating forward-looking statements,
you should consider these risks and uncertainties, together with the other risks described from time-to-time in our reports and documents which are filed with the SEC, and you
should not place undue reliance on those statements.

The
risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we
operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the
impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised), "Business Combinations," or SFAS No. 141(R), which
attempts to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its
effects. This Statement replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the acquisition method of
accounting (which Statement No. 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement also
retains the guidance in SFAS No. 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in SFAS No. 141(R) are:
(1) acquisition and restructuring costs

109

---



would
be now expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date the deal is announced; (3) contingent
consideration arising from contractual and non contractual contingencies that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold will be measured and recognized as
an asset or liability at fair value at the acquisition date using a probability-weighted discounted cash flows model, with subsequent changes in fair value reflected in earnings while non contractual
contingencies that do not meet the more-likely-than-not criteria will continue to be recognized when they are probable and reasonably estimable; and
(4) acquirer records 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the minority interest portion and goodwill which is recorded as if a 100% interest was
acquired. We adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009. We recorded an expense of $2,184 and $5,010 in connection with costs incurred with the internalization of the management and
acquisition of the Manager for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, "Non-Controlling Interest on Consolidated Financial
Statements"an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin, or ARB No. 51. This Statement amends ARB No. 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in
a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, this Statement requires that consolidated net
income include the amount attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009. As required, SFAS No. 160 was
applied retrospectively for all periods presented.

In
February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 140-3, or FSP No. 140-3, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions." FSP No. 140-3 provides guidance on the accounting for a purchase of a
financial asset from a counterparty and contemporaneous financing of the acquisition through repurchase agreements with the same counterparty. Under this guidance, the purchase and related financing
are linked, unless all of the following conditions are met at the inception of the transaction: (1) the purchase and corresponding financing are not contractually contingent; (2) the
repurchase financing provides recourse; (3) the financial asset and repurchase financing are readily obtainable in the marketplace and are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity
of financial asset and repurchase are not coterminous. A linked transaction would require a determination under FAS No. 140 to conclude if the transaction meets the requirements for sale
accounting. If the linked transaction does not meet sale accounting requirements, the net investment in the linked transaction is to be recorded as a derivative with the corresponding change in fair
value of the derivative being recorded through earnings. The value of the derivative would reflect changes in the value of the underlying debt investments and changes in the value of the underlying
credit provided by the counterparty. We currently present these transactions gross, with the acquisition of the financial assets in total assets and the related repurchase agreements as financing in
total liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and the interest income earned on the debt investments and interest expense incurred on the repurchase obligations are reported gross on the
consolidated income statements. As SFAS 140-3 is to be applied prospectively and as we have not acquired and simultaneously financed any transactions with the same counterparty
subsequent to January 1, 2009, SFAS 140-3 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-1, "Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13" ("FSP 157-1") and FSP 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157" ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 provides a one-year
deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a

110

---



recurring
basis. These non-financial items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and non-financial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and was adopted
by us, as it applies to its financial instruments, effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to financial instruments did not have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1,
2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.

In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, or SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early adoption encouraged. We have adopted SFAS
No. 161 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS no. 161 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2008, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP No. FAS 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets." FSP FAS
No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing a renewal or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under FASB Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," or SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We have adopted FSP FAS
No. 142-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS no. 142-3 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In
October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active", or FSP 157-3, which
clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and provides an illustrative example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that
financial asset is not active. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 157-3 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In
December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 ("FSP FAS 140-4 and
FIN 46(R)-8"), "Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities" which increases disclosure requirements
for public companies and is effective for reporting periods that end after December 15, 2008. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends SFAS No. 140,
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" to require public entities to provide additional disclosures about a transferor's continuing involvement
with transferred financial assets. It also amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" to require public enterprises, including
sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. We have adopted FSP
FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8.

In
January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1. This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to align it with the impairment
guidance within SFAS 115 by removing from EITF 99-20 the

111

---



requirement
to place exclusive reliance on market participants' assumptions about future cash flows when evaluating an asset for other-than-temporary impairment. The standard
now requires that assumptions about future cash flows consider reasonable management judgment about the probability that the holder of an asset will be unable to collect all amounts due. FSP
EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008. We have adopted EITF 99-20-1 and
it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" (FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP requires that the fair value disclosures required by SFAS 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" be
included for interim reporting periods. We have adopted this new accounting standard effective April 1, 2009. We have made the appropriate disclosures in the June 30, 2009 financial
statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). This FSP amends the impairment guidance relating to certain debt
securities and will require a company to assess the likelihood of selling the security prior to recovering its cost basis. Additionally, when a company meets the criteria for impairment, the
impairment charges related to credit losses would be recognized in earnings, while non-credit losses would be reflected in other comprehensive income. We have adopted this standard
effective April 1, 2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on determining when the trading volume
and activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased, which may indicate an inactive market, and on measuring the fair value of an asset or liability in inactive markets. We have adopted
this new accounting standard effective April 1, 2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on FAS 141R-1, "Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies" (FSP FAS 141R-1). FSP FAS 141R-1 requires that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability
assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of the asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. We adopted
this new accounting standard on January 1, 2009. Adoption of FSP FAS 140R-1 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events." This standard incorporates into authoritative accounting literature certain guidance that already existed within
generally accepted auditing standards, with the requirements concerning recognition and disclosure of subsequent events remaining essentially unchanged. This guidance addresses events which occur
after the balance sheet date but before the issuance of financial statements. Under SFAS No.165, as under previous practice, an entity must record the effects of subsequent events that provide
evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and must disclose but not record the effects of subsequent events which provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the
balance sheet date. This standard added an additional required disclosure relative to the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial
statements were issued. We adopted this standard effective beginning April 1, 2009.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assetsan amendment of FASB Statement No. 140," amending the guidance on
transfers of financial assets to, among other things, eliminate the qualifying special-purpose entity concept, include a new unit of

112

---



account
definition that must be met for transfers of portions of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting, clarify and change the derecognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for
as a sale, and require significant additional disclosure. This standard is effective January 1, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)," which revised the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities. The
modifications include the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and changes to when it
is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. This standard is effective January 1, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162," and approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The Codification does not change current
GAAP, but is intended
to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be
superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. Codification is effective July 1, 2009 and will require future
references to authoritative GAAP to coincide with the appropriate section of the Codification. Accordingly, this standard will not have an impact our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.

113

---





ITEM 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Market Risk

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that
affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risks to which we will be exposed are real estate, interest rate, liquidity and credit risks.

During
2007 and continuing through 2009, the global capital markets experienced unprecedented volatility, resulting in dramatic changes in credit spreads, prices of financial assets,
liquidity and the availability and cost of debt and equity capital. The impact has been most severe in the single-family residential real estate mortgage markets in the United States, but has more
recently affected the commercial real estate debt markets in which we invest. In particular, subsequent to the issuance of our third CDO in August 2007, the commercial real estate securitization
markets have experienced severe declines in transaction activity, reductions in short-term and long-term liquidity, and widening credit spreads. We have historically relied on
the securitization markets as a source of efficient match-funded financing structures for our portfolio of commercial loans and CMBS investment portfolio. Currently, the new issue market for
structured finance transactions including commercial real estate CDOs is dormant. This capital markets environment has led to increased cost of
funds and reduced availability of efficient debt capital, factors which have caused us to reduce our investment activity. These conditions have also adversely impacted the ability of commercial
property owners to service their debt and refinance their loans as they mature, and for our tenants to service their leases.

Real Estate Risk

Commercial and multi-family property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be
affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors),
local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of retail, industrial, office or other commercial or multi-family space), changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments, construction
quality, age and design, demographic factors, retroactive changes to building or similar codes, and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event net operating income decreases,
a borrower may have difficulty repaying our loans, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available
to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses. Even when a property's net operating income is sufficient to cover the property's debt service at the time a loan is made,
there can be no assurance that this will continue in the future. We employ careful business selection, rigorous underwriting and credit approval processes and attentive asset management to mitigate
these risks. These same factors pose risks to the operating income we receive from our portfolio of real estate investments, the valuation of our portfolio of owned properties, and our ability to
refinance existing mortgage and mezzanine borrowings supported by the cash flow and value of our owned properties.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international
economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

Our
operating results will depend in large part on differences between the income from our assets and our borrowing costs. Most of our commercial real estate finance assets and
borrowings are variable-rate instruments that we finance with variable rate debt. The objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes on the spread between
the yield on our assets and our

114

---



cost
of funds. We enter into hedging transactions with respect to all liabilities relating to fixed rate assets. If we were to finance fixed rate assets with variable rate debt and the benchmark for
our variable rate debt increased, our net income would decrease. Some of our loans are subject to various interest rate floors. As a result, if interest rates fall below the floor rates, the spread
between the yield on our assets and our cost of funds will increase, which will generally increase our returns. Because we generate income principally from the spread between the yields on our assets
and the cost of our borrowing and hedging activities, our net income will generally increase if LIBOR increases and decreases if LIBOR decreases, but this may not always be true in the future. A
hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 would have increased our interest cost by
approximately $12,975 offset by an increase in our investment income of approximately $9,146.

Our
exposure to interest rates will also be affected by our overall corporate leverage, which may vary depending on our mix of assets.

In
the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, delinquencies and defaults could increase and result in loan losses to us, which could adversely
affect our liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in
Rule 13a-15(e). Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect
or uncover failures within our company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports. Also, we may have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As
we do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our
consolidated subsidiaries.

As
of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal
control that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

115

---





PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Other than the risk factors set forth herein, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, except to the
extent the risk factors therein are inconsistent with the fact that (i) we are now an internally-managed company as a result of the internalization of the Manager, which we refer to herein as
the "internalization," and (ii) we have restructured certain of our debt facilities and eliminated various financial covenants thereunder, such risk factors would be deemed to be inapplicable
to us. As used in this Item 1A, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "our" and "our company" refer to all entities owned or controlled by Gramercy Capital Corp., including GKK
Capital LP, its operating partnership, and American Financial.

We are dependent on SitusServe, L.P. as the special servicer to our CDOs and may not find a suitable replacement if SitusServe LP were to terminate the special
servicing agreement.

SitusServe, L.P.
currently acts as the rated special servicer to our CDOs, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gramercy acts as sub-special servicer under a separate
arrangement between SitusServe, L.P. and Gramercy. If SitusServe terminates the special servicing agreement with respect to any of our CDOs, we will be required to replace SitusServe with
another rated special servicer (which could include Gramercy if Gramercy becomes a rated special servicer), and may be unable to do so on similar or more beneficial economic and other terms.

ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3.    DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On June 18, 2009, we held our annual meeting of stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") in New York, New York for the purpose of:
(i) electing two Class II directors to serve on the Board until our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify; and (ii) ratifying
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The total number of shares of common stock
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting was 49,920,469, of which 41,644,620 shares, or approximately 83.4%, were present in person or by proxy.

The
following sets forth the results of the election of directors:

Name of Class II Nominees

For

WithheldAllan J. Baum


39,868,844


1,775,776Roger M. Cozzi


39,881,258


1,763,362


There
was no solicitation in opposition to the foregoing nominees by stockholders. The terms of office of Jeffrey E. Kelter and Charles S. Laven, our Class I
directors, and Marc Holliday and Paul J. Konigsberg, our Class III directors, continued after the Annual Meeting.

116

---



The
ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 was
approved by our stockholders with 41,091,641 votes "For," 257,604 votes "Against" and 295,375 votes "Abstained," none of such Abstentions were actually broker non-votes that were treated
as Abstentions (as discussed in our Proxy Statement).

Further
information regarding the proposals in the Annual Meeting is contained in our Proxy Statement, dated May 8, 2009, which was filed with the SEC on that day.

ITEM 5.    OTHER INFORMATION

None

117

---





ITEM 6.

Exhibit No.

Description3.1

Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Amendment No. 5 to its Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (No. 333-114673), which was filed with
the Commission on July 26, 2004 and declared effective by the Commission on July 27, 2004).3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on December 14, 2007).3.3

Articles Supplementary designating the Company's 8.125% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.001 per share (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 18, 2007).4.1

Form of specimen stock certificate evidencing the common stock of the Company, par value $.001 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed
with the Commission on April 18, 2007).4.2

Form of stock certificate evidencing the 8.125% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.001 per share (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 18, 2007).10.1

Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2009, by and among Gramercy Warehouse Funding I LLC, GKK Trading Warehouse Funding I LLC, as borrowers, Gramercy Capital Corp., GKK
Capital LP, Gramercy Investment Trust and GKK Trading Corp., as guarantors, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which
was filed with the Commission on April 8, 2009).10.2

Amended and Restated Guarantee Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2009, by and among Gramercy Capital Corp., GKK Capital LP, Gramercy Investment Trust and GKK Trading Corp. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 8, 2009).10.3

GKK 2 Herald Mezz LLC Guarantee Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2009, by GKK 2 Herald Mezz LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was
filed with the Commission on April 8, 2009).10.4

GKK 885 Third Mezz LLC Guarantee Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2009, by GKK 885 Third Mezz LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which
was filed with the Commission on April 8, 2009).10.5

Second Omnibus Amendment, dated as of April 7, 2009, by and among Gramercy Warehouse Funding II LLC, GKK Trading Warehouse Funding II LLC, as borrowers, Gramercy Capital Corp., GKK Capital LP,
Gramercy Investment Trust and GKK Trading Corp., as guarantors, and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 8,
2009).


118

---



Exhibit No.

Description10.6

Securities Transfer Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2009, by and among Gramercy Capital Corp., GKK Capital LP, SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., GKK Manager Member Corp. and SL Green Realty Corp.
(solely for the purpose of Sections 2.6, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4(a), 7.4(b), 7.4(d), 7.4(e), 7.5, 7.6, 7.7 and Article VIII) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).10.7

Special Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2009, by and between Gramercy Capital Corp. and SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).10.8

Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2008, by and between GKK Manager LLC and Roger Cozzi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).10.9

Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2008, by and between GKK Manager LLC and Timothy O'Connor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).10.10

Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of July [    ], 2004, by and between GKK Manager LLC and Robert R. Foley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).10.11

Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2009, by and between Gramercy Capital Corp. and Jon W. Clark (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K which was filed with the Commission on April 28, 2009).31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.31.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.


119

---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GRAMERCY CAPITAL CORP.By:

/s/ JON W. CLARKName:  Jon W. ClarkTitle:Chief Financial Officer


Dated:
August 10, 2009

120

---



QuickLinks