alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 60399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20854]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 199 / Monday, October 17, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 60399]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2005-39 of September 28, 
                2005

                
Transfers of Defense Articles or Services for 
                Libya for Chemical Weapons Destruction

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                sections 40(g) and 40A of the Arms Export Control Act 
                (AECA), I hereby:

<bullet>

 determine that the transaction, encompassing sales or licensing for export 
of defense articles or defense services necessary to assist in chemical 
weapon (CW) destruction in Libya, is essential to the national security 
interests of the United States and important to the national interests of 
the United States;

<bullet>

 waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such 
transaction; and

<bullet>

 assign to you the functions under AECA section 40(g)(2) to consult with 
and submit reports to the Congress for proposed specific exports or 
transfers, 15 days prior to permitting them to proceed, that are necessary 
for and within the scope of this waiver determination and the transaction 
referred to herein.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                certification to the Congress and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 28, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-20854
Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5067 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5067

To prohibit any use of eminent domain authority by the United States to 
    expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site in southeastern Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2010

   Mr. Coffman of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any use of eminent domain authority by the United States to 
    expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site in southeastern Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY TO EXPAND 
              PINON CANYON MANEUVER SITE, COLORADO.

    The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not use 
eminent domain authority to expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site in 
southeastern Colorado.
                                 <all>
```
CONCURRING OPINION

No. 04-11-00193-CV

THE LYND COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-20466

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

CONCURRING OPINION TO DENIAL OF APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR EN BANC 

RECONSIDERATION

Sitting en banc: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Concurring opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Dissenting opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice, joined by Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice and 

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2012

I vote to deny appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration. However, I believe the 

dissent’s analysis has substantial merit. Therefore, I respectfully invite the Texas Supreme Court 

to review this court’s opinions and resolve this important question affecting Texas jurisprudence. 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Brandon Marchelle Lee

, * From the 266th District Court

of E rath County,

Trial Court No. CR15415

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 0 59

- CR * October 20 , 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Hon. HomerGarrison

Director, Departmen J Jr. Opinion No, O-3031 of Public Safety Re: Whether "Nestegg Night"' is CampMabry a violation of the lottery Austin, Texas law. Dear Sir: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of Jan. 8, 1941, requesting the opinion of this Department as to whether or not "Nestegg Night" constitutes a violation of the lottery laws of this State, Article 6.54of the Penal Code,

A circular enclosed with your letter reads as follows: "FEATHER YOUH NESTwfth $30000 OP VESTEGG Nite EVWYTHURSDAY NIGHT IS "NESTEGG

NITEnAT TH!& GUILDTHEATRE Crystal City, Texas NESTEGG NITE FEATHW

YOUR NEST "The ONestegg" is never less than $30*00 more

"If YOUare present and have signed the Application for Spare Timework 0 ., 0and your Application is the one selected you will "FEATHER YOUR NESTB with $30,00 or more O'IIf the party selected is not present on 'NESTEGG NITEnthe 'NESTEGG'will be increased $lO,OO for the next 'NESTEGG

N1TE.O "It is only necessary to sign one (1) Application, as the namewill always remain on file 0 ., o even if you are selected YOUR NUMBER

will be placed back fn the hopper and YOUcan be selected at some future tfme, "REMEMHEB

0 o oWEPLACE

YOUONOURPAY-ROLLo o e and deduct Social Security Taxes only, "In addition we pay our share of Taxes under theHon. HomerGarrison, Jr., page 2
Social Security Act which wlll~increase YOUB benefits under the Old Age Fund. We will select a number from the hopper, then refer to the Appllcatlon file and call the name. . . If the party is present you makeyourself knownby answering to the namecalled and come forward to the stage

. . . BEPBESENTT YOURS MAY BETHEONESELECTED.

“FIRST SELECTION: THUBSDAY

NIGHT,JANUARY

25th - 8830 P.M.’
follewlng Anappllcatlon card likewise enolosed is in the

f0lvn:

“NESTEGG NESTEGG

NITE NITE FEATHEiR

YOUH NEST FEA!l%ER

YOUR NBST GUILDTHEA!l!BE CRYSTAL CITY, TEXAS

“1 hereby file myapplication for spare time work. Name.

. . . . . . . . . . . o . o . . . . . . e . . . Bddrasa.

. . . . . . . . . . *

. 0.

. e . . . . . Telephone

. . . . . . Do . . . . . . . . . . . Andin conneotlon with these exhibits you state that: nit aeems that this~ theatre paasea out the enclosed card to persons who purohase a ticket, on which the purchaser makes appllcatlon for spare time work. Tlcketa am then 

### drawn one night each week and the winner, If present, recrives not less than 838.00, Of aourse it Is oompulsory that the 

### winner be in the theatre be&r he would be entitled to the m~nep.~ Fromthis we have aoncludea that this scheme is undistinguishable from the %ovie arlticU scheme, held to constltute a violation of our lottery laws In opinion No. O-54, aopy of which Is enclosed; and for the reasons set forth end under the authorities there cited you are advised that the operation of “Nestegg NightU by the theatre in question under the plan described will be a violation of Article 654 of the Penal Code. APPROVED

JAN18, 1941 /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY

GGNERAL

OFTEXAS APPROVED:

OPINIONCOMMITTEE By /s/ BWB,Chairman JDS:AMM:uaz,ENCLOSURE Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GEK&ElAL

OFTEXAS By /s/ James D. Smullen James Do Smullen, Assistant
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20755]



[[Page 60542]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee to the Director, National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee to the Director, National 
Cancer Institute.
    Date: October 31, 2005.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting will be to review the key 
Sarcoma PRG recommendations.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 
31 Center Drive, Room 11A48, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Cherie Nichols, Director of Science Planning and 
Assessment, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, Building 6116, Room 205, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-5515.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/joint/htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20755 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Jon W. Clark                  |                         |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Name:                                  | Jon      W. Clark            |
| Title:                                 | Chief      Financial Officer |
|                                   |                         |
| Date:  January      19, 2010 |

----
# Official Journal C 266/28 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 266 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6628 July 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 266

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6628 July 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 266/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107109 | 1 |
| 2023/C 266/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107951 | 3 |
| 2023/C 266/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.102707 (
  1
  ) | 4 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 266/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107109

1

2023/C 266/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107951

3

2023/C 266/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.102707 (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In the MATTER OF David P. RACHEL.

S19Y0258

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: December 10, 2018

William Jacob Cobb, Assistant General Counsel, Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel, Jenny K. Mittelman, State Bar of Georgia, Attorneys for the Appellant

David P. Rachel, The Rachel Law Firm PC, Mableton, Attorney for the Appellee

Herman Maddox Kilgore, Kilgore & Rodriguez LLC, Marietta, Daniel S. Reinhardt, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Attorneys for the Other Party

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of Special Master Daniel S. Reinhardt, who recommends the disbarment of David P. Rachel (State Bar No. 591601), a member of the State Bar since 2003. This matter arose from Rachel's conviction, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, for one count of conspiracy and 12 counts of money laundering. In a prior appearance of this matter, this Court accepted Rachel's earlier petition for voluntary discipline, suspending him until further order of this Court, pending his appeal of his federal convictions. *In the Matter of Rachel*, 297 Ga. 279, 773 S.E.2d 246 (2015). As recounted by the special master, that appeal has now concluded, as Rachel's convictions were affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and as his petition for certiorari review was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. As noted in this Court's prior opinion in this matter, Rachel acknowledged in his petition for voluntary discipline that his convictions constituted a violation of Bar Rule 8.4 (a) (2), the maximum sanction for a violation of which is disbarment.

Following the conclusion of Rachel's appellate proceedings, the State Bar moved for the appointment of a special master and for a hearing to be set on the matter. The Bar unsuccessfully attempted personal service on Rachel of a notice regarding the appointment of the special master and the setting of a hearing and then perfected service via publication. Rachel did not appear at the hearing on this matter, but the Bar presented argument and introduced evidence, on the basis of which the special master concluded that, in light of the conclusion of Rachel's federal criminal appeal, he stood in violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2), such that disbarment was appropriate. See *In the Matter of Houser*, 299 Ga. 284, 285-286, 787 S.E.2d 689 (2016).

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in these matters. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of David P. Rachel be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Rachel is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Disbarred.*

All the Justices concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-82059, 333-40736, and 333-33088) on Form S-8 of Primus Knowledge Solutions,
Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 26, 2001
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

401A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Jennifer T. Harrod, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Kiran H. Mehta, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Molly McIntosh Jagannathan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.

Matthew D. Quinn, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Sierra Club.

Peter H. Ledford, Attorney at Law, Benjamin Smith, Regulatory Counsel, Charlotte, for N.C. Sustainable Energy Association.

Gudrun Thompson, Attorney at Law, David L. Neal, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, Lucy E. Edmondson, Staff Attorney, for N.C. Utilities Commission-Public Staff.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 7th of November 2018 for Leave to File Documents Under Seal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION     I, Kevin A. Landgraver, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collegiate Funding Services, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                Date: August 05, 2005           By: /s/ Kevin A. Landgraver           Kevin A. Landgraver    Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPILHOLDING (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Nitin Amersey, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Nitin Amersey*     |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| August 30, 2016         |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER OFETS PAYPHONES, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, GUYA. LONGOBARDO, am the Chief Executive Officer of ETS Payphones, Inc. (the “Company”).

Thiscertification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection withthe filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”).

Ihereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(a)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.
| Dated: August 14, 2006 |                    |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                   |                    |   |
|                   | /s/ GUY A. LONGOBARDO   |   |
|                   | Guy A. Longobardo       |   |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ETS Payphones,Inc. and will be retained by ETS Payphones, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----