alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4932 

To waive temporarily the matching amount requirement with respect to 

section 21 of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. KRATOVIL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To waive temporarily the matching amount requirement with 

respect to section 21 of the Small Business Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Devel5 opment Centers Relief Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MATCHING REQUIREMENT WAIVER. 

7 During the 1-year period beginning on the date of 

8 enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small 

9 Business Administration shall waive the requirement 

10 under subsection (a)(4)(A) of section 21 of the Small 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4932 IH

1 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) that a matching amount 

2 be provided as a condition of grants under such section. 

3 Notwithstanding subsection (a)(4)(C)(ii) of such section, 

4 the amount of a grant under such section during such pe5 riod may exceed the amount of matching funds provided. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HERMAN MANN

No. 6815SC403

(Filed 9 October 1968)

Pueported appeal by defendant from *Bowman, S.J.,*January 1968 Criminal Session of AlamaNCe Superior Court.

Defendant was before the Superior Court, upon appeal from the Graham Municipal Court, under two warrants, one charging him with public drunkenness on 7 December 1967 and the other charging him with a second offense of public drunkenness on 8 December 1967. When his cases were called, defendant, without legal counsel, pled guilty to the charges. The cases were consolidated for judgment, and the court directed that the defendant be committed to the Director of Prisons for a period of not more than six months, said sentence to begin at the expiration of sentences being activated in cases Nos. 83, 84 and 92 imposed at the 12 June 1967 Session of the Court on three charges of public drunkenness but which sentences were suspended. Judgment by Judge Bowman was entered on 26 January 1968.

*530On 6 July 1968, Carr, Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, entered an order in which he found that the defendant, within ten days after 26 January 1968, gave notice of appeal from the judgment of Judge Bowman and, upon a further finding that defendant was indigent, appointed Attorney Herbert F. Pierce to perfect the appeal for the defendant.

*Attorney General T. Wa.de Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Millard B. Rich, Jr., for the State.*

*Herbert F. Pierce for defendant appellant.*

Britt, J.

Our rules require that an appeal to this Court be docketed within ninety days after the entry of judgment, unless an extension of time not to exceed sixty additional days is obtained from the trial tribunal. The record on appeal in this case was not filed in this Court until 3 September 1968, therefore, we will treat said record as a petition for certiorari.

The only assignment of error appearing in the record is that “[t]he trial court erred in entering judgment as it did and in imposing the sentence set forth in said judgment.” We have reviewed the record and find that the defendant pled guilty to warrants valid on their face and that the sentence imposed was within statutory limits. The record discloses no reason for us to grant certiorari.

The petition for certiorari is

Denied.

BROCK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned executive officer of the registrant hereby certifies that this Form 10-K
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|Steven R. Lewis                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: September 9, 2005
#### Wilfred HART, II, Appellant, v. Bruce C. BAILLIE, Appellee.

No. 4D02-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

Wilfred Hart, II, Jensen Beach, pro se.

Nancy W. Gregoire and D. David Keller of Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirsehbaum, Keller, McIntyre *&*Gregoire, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Steele v. Kehoe,*747 So.2d 981 (Fla.1999); *Rowe v. Schreiber,*725 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen R. LightStephen R. LightPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)


May 14, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20577]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
Reform

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises all interested persons of the location of 
the October 18, 2005, public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel 
on Federal Tax Reform. This meeting was previously announced in 70 FR 
57923 (October 4, 2005).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, in 
Washington, DC, and will begin at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Ronald Reagan Building & 
International Trade Center Amphitheater, Concourse Level, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX 
(927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4bdbab2bb94a0b5aca6b1b2bba6b9a4b5bab1b8fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6afa8a0a986b2a7beb4a3a0a9b4abb6a7a8a3aae8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a> 
(please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is 
available at http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.

    Dated: October 11, 2005.
Mark S. Kaizen,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20577 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

|   | (1)    | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended                September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of                the                dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report.                                                                                                                    |

|                                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ John              Works                                                                       |   |   |   |
| John                Works Chief                  Executive Officer November                    8, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Jasmine L. BURTON

No. 394P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Wallace W. Bradsher, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Jasmine L. Burton, for Burton, Jasmine

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of November 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Person County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

*638"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20931]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1414


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 222, Montgomery, Alabama, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 222, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 222 to include two sites at the Airport 
Industrial Commercial Park (Site 3 - 1,044 acres) and at the Montgomery 
County Technology Park (Site 4 - 368 acres) in Montgomery, Alabama, 
adjacent to the Birmingham Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 57-2004, 
filed 12/8/04);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (69 FR 74492, 12/14/04) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations would be satisfied, and that approval of the 
application would be in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 222 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and further 
subject to the Board's standard 2,000-acre limit for the overall zone 
project.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of October 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20931 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, I, Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.




Dated: May 21, 2010




/s/ Gorica Adduci


Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of


Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of eCOST.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Elizabeth Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Elizabeth Murray   
|                      |  |  |  | Elizabeth Murray       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 95-31081

(Summary Calendar)

_________________________

PAUL J. MAYEUX, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Acting Warden;

RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney

General,

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________________________________________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-672-G)

__________________________________________________

July 2, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

PaulJ. Mayeux appealsfromthe district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, 28 U.S.C. §2254. He argues that the evidence was insufficient, and that recordings of

telephone conversations allegedlymade inviolationofhisFourthAmendmentrightswere erroneously
2

admitted into evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court ‘s opinion on these issues

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district

court. Mayeux v. Whitley, No. 95-0672 (E.D. La. Oct. 6, 1995).

Mayeux arguesthat the “reasonable doubt” jury instruction was unconstitutional under Cage

v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 U.S. 328, 112 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1990), and Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508

U.S. 275, 113 S. Ct. 2078, 124 L. Ed. 2d 182 (1993). The reasonable doubt instruction that Mayeux

challengesis equivalent to the instruction upheld by this court in Weston v. Ieyoub, 69 F.3d 73, 74-75

(5th Cir. 1995). Because of the inclusion of the phrase “abiding conviction,” there was no reasonable

likelihood that the jury applied the instructions in a way that violated the constitution. See Weston,

69 F.3d at 75.

Mayeux assertsthat the district court erred in affording the presumption of correctnessto the

state habeas court’s finding that Mayeux failed to establish that the witness’s statements were false.

Assuming arguendo that the presumption of correctness does not apply, Mayeux has failed to

establish that the prosecutor knowingly allowed the victim’sperjured testimonyto go to the jury. See

Blackmon v. Scott, 22 F.3d 560, 565 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 115 S. Ct. 671, 130 L. Ed.

2d 604 (1994).

Finally, Mayeux asserts that his trial counsel was ineffective and attempts to incorporate by

reference the arguments which were presented to the district court in his habeas petition. An

appellant may not incorporate in his brief his argumentsfrom other pleadings. Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### James William BURNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-3798.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2003.

*610James William Burney, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right Burney might have to file a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, STRINGER, and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the first amendment of the Annual Report of Accredo Health,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David D. Stevens, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

/s/ David D. Stevens

David D. Stevens

President and Chief Executive Officer

June 28, 2005

Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Roy A. COOPER, III, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Philip E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; Charlton L. Allen, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina Industrial Commission; and Yolanda K. Stith, in her official capacity as Vice-Chair of the North Carolina Industrial Commission

No. 315PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Cooper, Roy A. (III)

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

***AMENDED ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 21st of September 2018 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(1).
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of MedaSorb
      Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of MedaSorb Technologies, Inc. for
              the
              quarter ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
              of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of MedaSorb
              Technologies, Inc..
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Sam MedleyName:
            Sam
                MedleyTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            February
                17, 2006By:
            /s/
                Rowe NelsonName:
            Rowe
                NelsonTitle:
            Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            February
                17, 2006