alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4987 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4987

 To use unexpended stimulus funds to replenish the Highway Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

Mr. Schock (for himself and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To use unexpended stimulus funds to replenish the Highway Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reclaiming Our American Dollars 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF UNEXPENDED STIMULUS FUNDS TO REPLENISH HIGHWAY TRUST 
              FUND.

    (a) Transfer of Funds.--Of the discretionary appropriations made 
available by division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 
of 2009 (Public Law 111-5), the unexpended balances on the date of the 
enactment of this Act shall be transferred to the Highway Trust Fund 
established by section 9503 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to 
remain available until expended.
    (b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to funds made 
available--
            (1) in title IV of such division A under the heading 
        ``Corps of Engineers--Civil''; or
            (2) in title XII of such division A under the heading 
        ``Department of Transportation''.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00258-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D., A CHILD §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 

County Court at Law No. 1

of Wichita County (13166-JR-E)

August 22, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
#### Gianni Proios, as Assignee of the Estate of Enzo Angiolini, Deceased, Appellant, v Nine West Group Inc. et al., Respondents.

[718 NYS2d 852]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered May 20, 1999, which granted the motion of defendants-respondents for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny defendants’ summary judgment motion as to the second and third causes of action, reinstate those causes of action, grant plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to assert a claim for pension benefits, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered May 11, 2000, which denied plaintiffs motion to renew, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The IAS Court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action. Sufficient factual questions were raised as to the decedent’s relationship with Nine West so as to preclude a finding that he was not, as a matter of law, entitled to additional incentives for product sales in 1993 of footwear designed in 1992, or entitled to life insurance benefits as a vice president of the Enzo Angiolini Division. Defendants’ business techniques raise questions about whether decedent, their chief designer, and his estate, were entitled to further benefits. Defendants have not *346demonstrated as a matter of law that Angiolini and his estate received all that they were entitled to.

Further, the record reveals evidence indicating that Angiolini was entitled to pension benefits, and that the plan administrator had indeed calculated the specific amount of his benefits. Defendants contend that foreign nationals were not allowed to participate in the plan. The parties’ claims are worthy of exploration. Judicial economy would be best served by giving plaintiff the opportunity to amend his complaint so that this issue may be resolved with the other outstanding claims. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5610-5611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-830]


Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Taiwan; Notice of Extension 
of Time Limits for Preliminary Results in Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 3, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood or Jill Pollack at 
(202) 482-3874 or (202) 482-4593, respectively, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background
    On June 30, 2004, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(69 FR 39409) a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on stainless steel plate in coils from Taiwan. 
The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2003, through April 30, 2004, and 
the preliminary results are currently due no later than January 31, 
2004.

Extension of Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the Department shall make a preliminary 
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping order 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date 
of publication of the order. The Act further provides, however, that 
the Department may extend the 245-day period to 365 days if it 
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
foregoing time period. We determine that it is not practicable to 
complete this administrative review within the time limits mandated by 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because the Department received a 
filing from the petitioners in this administrative review \1\ on 
January 21, 2005, in which the petitioners allege that Ta Chen 
Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd. misclassified entries of subject merchandise 
made during the POR as non-subject merchandise. The Department requires 
further time in order to analyze the issue. Consequently, we have 
extended the deadline for completing the preliminary results until May 
31, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The petitioners are Allegheny Ludlum Corp., United Auto 
Workers Local 3303, Zanesville Armco Independent Organization and 
the United Steelworkers of America, and AFL-CIO/CLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act (19

[[Page 5611]]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: January 28, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-2088 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 (the “Report”) of Prospect Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Commission on the date hereof, I, Kristin L. Van Dask, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Date:May 9, 2022/s/ KRISTIN L. VAN DASKKristin L. Van DaskChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Prospect Capital Corporation and will be retained by Prospect Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1462
DANIEL LEWIS COMPEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-04-1377-1) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Lewis Compel, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Kelley, Brent Eugene Baxter, REED SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Lewis Compel appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint against CitiMortgage, Incorporated. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. SeeCompel v. CitiMortgage, Inc. , No. CA-04-1377-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7025

KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. J. CEPAK, Warden; LIEUTENANT FITZGERALD;

LIEUTENANT SANDERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

JACKSON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PEARSON; BROWN,

Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

ROSENBURGH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-96-1164-O-23BD)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS,

LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion partially accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Cepak,

No. CA-96-1164-O-23BD (D.S.C. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

December 16, 2015

ERRATUM 

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2015-1108

______________________ 

OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC., NKA UNWIRED 

PLANET, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., 

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

Decided: December 15, 2015

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

The following change has been made on page 2, footnote 1 of the 

opinion. 

Replace: 

“5,808,415”

With:

“5,809,415”
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1"> Country-Wide Insurance Company a/a/o Quinbin Yuan, Petitioner-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO General Insurance Company, Respondent-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Petitioner, as limited by its brief, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jose A. Padilla, J.), entered June 1, 2016, as denied its petition to confirm an arbitration award dated November 17, 2015, and granted respondent's cross-petition to confirm an arbitration award dated January 29, 2016.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Jose A. Padilla, J.), entered June 1, 2016, affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><p>The cross-petition to confirm the arbitration award dated January 29, 2016 was properly granted. The arbitrator's determination that respondent GEICO was entitled to recoup no-fault benefits paid through "loss transfer" reimbursement was supported by the evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious (<i>see Matter of DTG Operations, Inc. v AutoOne Ins. Co.,</i> 144 AD3d 422 [2016]; <i>Matter of Emerald Claims Mgt. for Ullico Cas. Ins. Co. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., </i>121 AD3d 481, 482 [2014]). </p><p>Contrary to the appellant's contention that the arbitrator improperly considered new evidence, the prior arbitration award expressly provided that GEICO "should not be precluded from re-filing with additional evidence." In any event, any purported mistake by the arbitrator in considering certain evidence was not "so gross or palpable as to establish fraud or misconduct" (<i>Korein v Rabin</i>, 29 AD2d 351, 356 [1968]; CPLR 7511[b][1][i]), and did not, by itself, provide a sufficient basis for vacatur (<i>see Matter of Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, </i>262 AD2d 565 [1999]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur 	<br>Decision Date: April 12, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ William D. Kirkland William                D. KirklandChief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 3.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jon C.  Nicolaysen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Rancher  Energy Corp.  (the
Company),  certify,  that  pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code:

         (1) The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarterly
period ended  September  30,  2010,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the  requirements
of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

         (2)  Information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


/s/ Jon C. Nicolaysen
--------------------------------------
Jon C. Nicolaysen

Chief Executive Officer &  Acting Chief Accounting Officer

November 16, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMOH A. BADMUS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-453-1) Submitted: May 14, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John O. Iweanoge, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN O. IWEANOGE, P.A., Rosslyn, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Stephanie L. Bibighaus, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jimoh A. Badmus appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of audita querela . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Badmus , No. CR-91-453-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-84904, 333-57486, 333-44794, 333-38078 and 333-93423) pertaining to the 2000 International Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, the 1997 StockOption Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan of Maxygen, Inc., of our report dated February 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Maxygen, Inc. included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 24, 2003
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SK Realty Corp., (the "Registrant")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


      (1)   The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32,
            fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant


Dated: November 22, 2006                            /s/ Richard Miller
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Richard Miller,
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group.Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey H. Hurst, PhD, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH, 6701 Rockledge Drive, RM 7208, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0303,                         *hurstj@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 11, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-21024  Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M