alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list C 310/2023

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 310 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 66.1 rujna 2023. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 310

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 66.1 rujna 2023.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europska komisija |
| 2023/C 310/01 | Tečajna lista eura – 31. kolovoza 2023. | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

2023/C 310/01

Tečajna lista eura – 31. kolovoza 2023.

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

| 1.9.2023 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 310/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2023

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 310/1

---

Tečajna lista eura (1)

31. kolovoza 2023.

(2023/C 310/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | američki dolar | 1,0868 |
| JPY | japanski jen | 158,49 |
| DKK | danska kruna | 7,4523 |
| GBP | funta sterlinga | 0,85718 |
| SEK | švedska kruna | 11,8430 |
| CHF | švicarski franak | 0,9584 |
| ISK | islandska kruna | 142,30 |
| NOK | norveška kruna | 11,5800 |
| BGN | bugarski lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka kruna | 24,072 |
| HUF | mađarska forinta | 380,13 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,4673 |
| RON | rumunjski novi leu | 4,9420 |
| TRY | turska lira | 28,9848 |
| AUD | australski dolar | 1,6785 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4721 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,5250 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,8259 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,4686 |
| KRW | južnokorejski von | 1 439,56 |
| ZAR | južnoafrički rand | 20,4199 |
| CNY | kineski renminbi-juan | 7,9196 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 551,96 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 5,0428 |
| PHP | filipinski pezo | 61,545 |
| RUB | ruski rubalj | |
| THB | tajlandski baht | 38,005 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 5,3082 |
| MXN | meksički pezo | 18,1866 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 89,9293 |

Valuta

Tečaj

USD

američki dolar

1,0868

JPY

japanski jen

158,49

DKK

danska kruna

7,4523

GBP

funta sterlinga

0,85718

SEK

švedska kruna

11,8430

CHF

švicarski franak

0,9584

ISK

islandska kruna

142,30

NOK

norveška kruna

11,5800

BGN

bugarski lev

1,9558

CZK

češka kruna

24,072

HUF

mađarska forinta

380,13

PLN

poljski zlot

4,4673

RON

rumunjski novi leu

4,9420

TRY

turska lira

28,9848

AUD

australski dolar

1,6785

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4721

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,5250

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,8259

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,4686

KRW

južnokorejski von

1 439,56

ZAR

južnoafrički rand

20,4199

CNY

kineski renminbi-juan

7,9196

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 551,96

MYR

malezijski ringit

5,0428

PHP

filipinski pezo

61,545

RUB

ruski rubalj

THB

tajlandski baht

38,005

BRL

brazilski real

5,3082

MXN

meksički pezo

18,1866

INR

indijska rupija

89,9293

---

(1)  Izvor: referentna tečajna lista koju objavljuje ESB.

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CLIFFORD EARL MAYO

No. 7518SC517

(Filed 5 November 1975)

Gambling § 3; Criminal Law § 112— lottery — instruction placing burden on defendant erroneous

In a prosecution for possession of lottery tickets, the trial court properly instructed the jury that the State had the burden of proving that the defendant knew that the pieces of paper with the numbers on them were lottery tickets, but the court erred in instructing that, “under our law unless the defendant introduces evidence of lack of knowledge, this element may be presumed.”

Appeal by defendant from *Collier, Judge.*Judgment entered 19 February 1975 in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 October 1975.

Defendant was tried upon the charge of possession of lottery tickets in violation of G.S. 14-291.1. He was found guilty by a jury, and from a judgment imposing prison sentence defendant appealed to this Court.

*337
      *Attorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General John M. Silverstein, for the State.*

*Taylor, Upper man and Johnson, by Herman L. Taylor and Leroy W. Upperman, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

The trial judge, instructing the jury on the elements of the crime, charged the State with the burden of proving that the defendant knew that the pieces of paper with the numbers on them were lottery tickets. However the trial judge then stated, “I instruct you that under our law unless the defendant introduces evidence of lack of knowledge, this element may be presumed.” The defendant contends that the trial court’s charge failed to place the burden of proof on the State. We agree.

The defendant’s plea of not guilty casts upon him a presumption of innocence and the State has the burden of satisfying the jury from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt of each and every material element of the offense. *State v. Moore,*268 N.C. 124, 150 S.E. 2d 47 (1966) ; *State v. Dallas,*253 N.C. 568, 117 S.E. 2d 415 (1960) ; *State v. Cephus,*239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E. 2d 147 (1954). The trial court committed prejudicial error by requiring the defendant to negate the existence of a material element of the crime.

New trial.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Collegiate Funding Services, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin A. Landgraver, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 09, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Kevin A. LandgraverKevin A. Landgraver
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### David August DHAEMERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1432.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

March 15, 1972.

Whitney E. Tarutis, Bemidji, Minn., for appellant.

Henry W. McCarr, J., Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., Warren R. Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., George M. Scott, Hennepin County Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal was taken by petitioner from the federal district court’s denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied a writ of habeas corpus to David August Dhaemers, a state prisoner, for the reasons set out in the decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Dhaemers v. State, 286 Minn. 250, 175 N.W.2d 457 (1970) (post-conviction) and State v. Dhaemers, 276 Minn. 332, 150 N.W.2d 61 (1967). This appeal followed.

We have reviewed the entire record and case law. Petitioner’s claim that his amnesia on the day of the offense is proof of his incompetency to provide assistance to his trial counsel is not dispositive of the issue. See United States v. Sullivan, 406 F.2d 180 (2 Cir. 1969). We agree that the Supreme Court *1292of the State of Minnesota has fully and adequately considered petitioner’s federal claims. No further evidentiary hearing is necessary.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

EX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of Premier Entertainment Biloxi LLC, (the “Company”),for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

**•**                  TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form l0-Q for the period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

**•**                  Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:August 2, 2005

 

 
| /s/     Joseph  L. Billhimer              |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:       Joseph L. Billhimer |   |
| Title:      Chief Operating Officer  |   |
|                                                               |   |
|                                                               |   |
| /s/     Gregory  J. Bosarge               |   |
| Name:       Gregory  J. Bosarge |   |
| Title:      Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Trim Holding Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Louis Bertoli, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Louis Bertoli       |
|-------------------------|
| Louis Bertoli           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| November 15, 2010       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-1425

_____________________________

JEFFERY KENON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Francis J. Allman, Judge.

April 24, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Candice Kaye Brower, Regional Conflict Counsel, and Michael J. 

Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and 

Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jamie Kerr, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global-e Investments, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  July 27, 2005



/s/ Jamie Kerr

President
Antwone D. ARCHIE v. Johnney HAWKINS/Jose Stein

No. 231P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Antwone Dennard Archie, for Archie, Antwone Dennard.

Mr. Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*690***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 30th of August 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of August 2017 by Petitioner to Review Defendant's Capacity to Proceed:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of August 2017 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Hudson, J. recused
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A  for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|  

/s/ Glenn D. Bolduc

 

Glenn D. Bolduc

 

President, Chief Executive Officer 

Date: October 28, 2013

 

This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

h0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148248 & (57)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148248

COA: 310706

Wayne CC: 11-004936-FC

PAUL ANTHONY DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




To the Board of Directors
American Energy Services, Inc.

In connection with our audits of the financial statements of American Energy
Services, Inc. as of February 28, 2001 and February 29, 2000, and for each of
the two years then ended, which financial statements are included in the Form
10-KSB, we have also audited the financial statement schedules listed in Item 14
herein.

In our opinion, these financial statement schedules, when considered in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material respects, the information required to be included therein.



Simonton, Kutac & Barnidge, L.L.P.
Houston, Texas


May 25, 2001


<PAGE>

                         AMERICAN ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION OF QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Balance       Acquisitions       Charge         Charged                      Balance At
                                       At Beginning        And              To           To Other                       End of
                                        Of Period      Dispositions      Operations      Accounts     Deductions        Period
                                      -------------  ---------------   ------------    ------------  -------------   -------------
<S>                                     <C>              <C>             <C>             <C>           <C>             <C>
Year ended February 28, 2001
    Allowance for doubtful accounts     $ 20,000         $   --          $ 39,493        $   --        $   --          $ 59,493
                                        ========         ========        ========        ========      ========        ========

Year ended February 29, 2000
    Allowance for doubtful accounts     $ 20,000         $   --          $   --          $   --        $   --          $ 20,000
                                        ========         ========        ========        ========      ========        ========
</TABLE>
WOIM traTIMMY: 41 :' _ - 7. 7. 1 14 ,7 

## habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance.' NRS

34.724(2)(c). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. Saitta J. cc: Jorge Torres, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City

1 

## We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

## 2 (0) 1947A 4410 ,,
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 2, 2017/s/ R. Kipp deVeerR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: November 2, 2017/s/ Penni F. RollPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20741]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 10 a.m.-2:30 p.m.

PLACE: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005. (Metro Stop: Metro Center.)

AGENDA: The Commission will receive the following reports: Title II 
Requirements Payments Update; Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 
Update; and updates on other administrative matters. The Commission 
will receive presentations on the Timely Return of Voter Registration 
Applications.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20741 Filed 10-12-05; 3:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
```