alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10209 and <greek-i> 10210]


Florida Disaster <greek-i> FL-00008

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Florida dated October 4, 2005.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: July 29, 2005 through August 14, 2005.
    Effective Date: October 4, 2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 5, 2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: July 5, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Polk
Contiguous Counties: Florida
    Hardee, Highlands, Hillsborough, Lake, Manatee, Okeechobee, Orange, 
Osceola, Pasco, Sumter.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      5.750
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.875
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.387
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.750
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10209 6 
and for economic injury is 10210 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
FLORIDA.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-20728 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert J. DiNicola, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end if the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 10, 2005
    /s/ Robert J. DiNicolaRobert J. DiNicolainterim Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Edward F. Gotschall, Vice Chairman - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Edward F. GotschallEdward F. GotschallVice Chairman - FinanceAugust 9, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### UNIFIED ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING, INC., Appellant, v. Richard S. WALDROP and Ellen M. Waldrop, Appellees.

No. 5D03-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 15, 2003.

*366Frederick R. Hardt and Marc A. Huling, of Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Naples, for Appellant.

Elise A. Singer, Melbourne, for Appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This is the appeal of a default final judgment. Appellee concedes that service of process on appellant was fatally defective. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
DE LUCA, et al. v. STEIN, et al.

339A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2019

Paul Stam, Attorney at Law, Apex, R. Daniel Gibson, Attorney at Law, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education

Amy O'Neal, Attorney at Law, for De Luca, Francis X., et al

Jennie Wilhelm Hauser, Special Deputy Attorney General

Mary MacLean Asbill, Attorney at Law, Brooks Rainey Pearson, Attorney at Law, Blakely E. Hildebrand, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Coastal Federation, et al

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Lindsey Vance Smith, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Allison Schafter, Attorney at Law, for NC School Boards Association

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of February 2019 by Defendant and Intervenors to Reset the *65230-Day Deadline for Opening Briefs from Date of the Court's Order on this Motion:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2019."
#### Josephine Cassel, as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles L. Cassel, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*Cassel*v. *City of New York,*177 App. Div. 917, affirmed.

(Submitted June 4, 1918;

decided July 12, 1918.)

. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 9, 1917, *unanimously*affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in an action to recover damages to plaintiff’s hotel and restaurant business alleged to have been caused by the unnecessary obstruction and excavation of an adjoining street and unnecessary delay and negligence in the construction of a sewer. The defense was that the excavation in question was necessitated by the construction of a sewer; that it was a public work, carried on by and under the authority and direction of law; that the contractors who performed the work were independent contractors, and that‘the city was not responsible for their tortious acts.

*Chase Mellen*for appellant.

*William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *John F. O’Brien*of counsel) for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and- Cardozo, JJ. Not voting: McLaughlin, J.
STATE of North Carolina v. Montise A. MITCHELL

No. COA18-333

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00849

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.M.D, R.I.D., AND G.T.D.,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007

- CI

- 06895

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion to Remove Cause from Submission and Motion to Extend Time

to file Appellee Brief is MOOT. This court ’ s opinion has issued in this appeal.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
HAARHUIS v. CHEEK

332P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 22, 2018

Stephanie W. Anderson, Walter K. Burton, Cam Bordman, Charles M. Ivey, III, Charles M. Ivey, IV, Darren A. McDonough, Attorneys at Law, for Cheek, Emily.

J. David Stradley, Robert P. Holmes, IV, Leto Copeley, Attorneys at Law, for Haarhuis, Joris (Administrator), et al.

Meghan Wray Deutsch-Blanco, Attorney at Law, for State.

Cynthia L. Van Horne, Attorney at Law, for Burton, Sue & Anderson, LLP.

John P. Barringer, Jeffrey B. Kuykendal, Attorneys at Law, for Universal Insurance Company.

*100The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of October 2018 by Plaintiff to Reconsider and Vacate Order Allowing Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of October 2018."
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William RANDOLPH, Jr., aka Clarence Randolph, aka Bobby Moore, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2873.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 10, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1972.

Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant.

Joseph L. Ward, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst.

U. S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
STATE of North Carolina, v. John-Adam Delone ELLER, Defendant.

No. COA17-1124

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

          - [Funding Opportunity Number: CE05-018] 

      ( print page 5685)    
                    A notice announcing the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2005 funds for cooperative agreements to to establish up to ten National Academic Centers of Excellence (ACE) on Youth Violence Prevention, serving as national models for the prevention of youth violence, was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 22, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 224, pages 67915-67930.                 

The notice is amended as follows: 

On page 67917, Column 3, Section IV.1. Address to Request application Package, delete the first sentence and replace with “To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398 (OMB number 0925-0001 rev. 

9/2004). 

Dated: January 28, 2005. 

William P. Nichols, 

Director, Procurement and Grants Office,  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 05-2044 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 12.1 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PETER CHAMBRÉ PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Peter Chambré, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5.    Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 4, 2003

/s/    Peter Chambré

Name: Peter Chambré

Title: Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-71481, No. 333-85638and No. 333-141493) of Entercom Communications Corp. of our report dated March 15,2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

\s\ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 15, 2010

 

1

----
#### Jeffrey B. Schwartzberg, Appellant, v Shek Cheung Lui et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 106]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for trespass, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered October 5, 1999, which, in effect, granted the defendant’s motion made at the close of the plaintiffs case to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The burden of establishing ownership of the subject driveway was upon the plaintiff *(see, Duggan v Hyland,*50 AD2d 1066; *Judd v Chilson,*177 App Div 121). The plaintiff attempted to establish his case through the use of two surveys. The first survey did not establish that the driveway, used by both the plaintiff and the defendants, encroached upon the plaintiffs property. The second survey was a copy of a survey obtained by the defendants which the plaintiff attached to letters he sent to the defendants. That survey was not admitted into evidence for the truth of its contents because the plaintiff did not establish that it satisfied an exception to the hearsay rule. Moreover, the plaintiff failed to establish that he suffered any damages *(see, Dellaportas v County of Putnam,*240 AD2d 358). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Adam Shaffer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of eCOST.com, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Adam Shaffer                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Adam Shaffer Chief Executive Officer and Chairman