alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Information on the meeting may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

      ( print page 60380)    
Dated: September 1, 2005.

Connie M. Downs,

Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

[FR Doc. 05-20872  Filed 10-13-05; 3:46 am]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
#### ESTHER V. SHELTON, Employee v. SPIC AND SPAN DRY CLEANERS, Employee and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier

No. 6810IC370

(Filed 9 October 1968)

Master and Servant § 97— newly discovered evidence — new trial

Upon- appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission denying; compensation to plaintiff on the ground the claim was not filed in apt. time as required by G.S. 97-24, plaintiff having alleged the accident occurred “on or about the middle” of a certain month, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence as to the correct date of the accident which was not divulged to plaintiff until after' the-opinion of the Industrial Commission, is allowed by the Court of Appeals.

Appeal by plaintiff employee from an opinion and award by the-North Carolina Industrial Commission dated 14 May 1968. ,

Plaintiff alleges that she sustained injury to her spine as a result of a fall in January 1964 while in the course of her employment with defendant employer. On 11 January 1966 plaintiff filed notice-of claim with the Industrial Commission, alleging that the accident, occurred “on or about the middle of January, 1964.”

The hearing commissioner found that plaintiff sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment, with the defendant employer, and that the accident occurred on or about 6 January 1964. The hearing commissioner awarded compensation.

Upon appeal by defendants to the full commission the full commission found substantially the same facts as the hearing commissioner, except the full commission found that the date of the accident was 6 January 1964, that plaintiff’s claim was filed 11 January 1966r and that the filing of the claim was not in apt time as required by G.S. 97-24. The full commission denied compensation, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Boyce, Lake and Burns, by Robert E. Smith, ¡or plaintiff appellant. ^*

*Teague, 'Johnson, Patterson, Dilthey and Clay, by G. S. Patterson, Jr., for defendant appellees.*

Brock, J.

After the Record on Appeal and the briefs of both parties had been filed in this Court, plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, based upon the affidavits-*529of plaintiff and her husband in which it is alleged that evidence bearing upon the correct date of the accident can now be obtained from plaintiff’s employer, which evidence was not divulged to plaintiff until after entry of opinion and award by the North Carolina Industrial Commission.

After due consideration of the motion and affidavits, and after due consideration of the answer filed thereto by defendants; and without any intimation as to the sufficiency or the probative effect of the evidence, we are of the opinion that a new trial should be awarded by reason of newly discovered evidence.

In accord with the rule of our Supreme Court as recognized in *Brantley v. R. R.,*211 N.C. 454, 190 S.E. 731, the facts on the motion are not discussed.

Remanded to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for a new hearing.

Remanded.

Britt and Parker, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, R.
Christopher Hoehn-Saric, Chief Executive Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Christopher Hoehn-SaricName:

R. Christopher Hoehn-SaricDate:

November 8, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Small Business Company., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, David Larson, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      September 30, 2008





/s/
      David
      Larson





David
      Larson, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoSensors, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted Wong, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By: /s/
      Ted
      Wong


Ted
      Wong,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


April
      16,
      2007













*This
      Certification which accompanies the Report is not deemed filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.* *A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to NanoSensors, Inc. and will be
      retained by NanoSensors, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.*
In the MATTER OF: E.J.R., A.J.R., and D.F.R.

No. COA18-270

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, S. D. Shibulal, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infosys Limited for the year ended March 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Limited.




/s/ S. D. SHIBULALDate: May 3, 2012
S. D. Shibulal

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPILHOLDING (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Nitin Amersey, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Nitin Amersey*     |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| November 19, 2013       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (Robert McCormick)**

 

This AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into, effective as of June 14, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Robert McCormick (“Executive”) and Douglas Dynamics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).

 

WHEREAS, Executive and the Company are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of September 7, 2004 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement as provided for herein, effective as of the Effective Date.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:

 

1.                                      The first sentence of Section 1(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Subject to the terms set forth herein, the Company and Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“**Douglas**”), respectively, agree to employ Executive as their Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and in such other executive capacities as may be requested from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors (the **“Board”**) or a duly authorized committee thereof, and Executive hereby accepts such employment.”

 

2.                                      The first sentence of Section 1(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

Executive shall receive for services to be rendered hereunder a salary at the rate of $22,500 per month payable at least as frequently as monthly and subject to payroll deductions as may be necessary or customary in respect of the Company’s and Douglas’ salaried employees (the **“Base Salary”**).

 

3.                                      Except as expressly provided herein, the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above.

 

 
|   | DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.     |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |
|   |                            |   |
|   | By:                             | /s/ James L. Janik |
|   | Name: James L. Janik            |
|   | Title: President & CEO |
|   |                            |
|   |                            |
|   | EXECUTIVE                       |
|   |                            |
|   |                            |
|   | /s/ Robert McCormick            |
|   | Robert McCormick                |

 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement]

 

----
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-K**I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and Director, certifythat: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Cellular Corporation, or the “registrant”;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME                                                 STATE OF INCORPORATION
----                                                 ----------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
CompuCredit Funding Corp.                            Nevada
CompuCredit Funding Corp. II                         Nevada
CompuCredit Acquisition Corporation                  Nevada
CompuCredit Acquisition Funding Corp.(2)             Nevada
CompuCredit Acquisition Funding Corp. III(2)         Nevada
CompuCredit Services Corporation                     Nevada
Citadel Group, Inc.                                  Florida
CompuCredit Reinsurance Ltd.(1)                      Turks and Caicos Islands
AspireCard.com, Inc.                                 Georgia
AspireCard Services, Inc.                            Georgia
</TABLE>

(1) The Corporation is a subsidiary of CompuCredit Services Corporation.
(2) The Corporation is a subsidiary of CompuCredit Acquisition Corporation.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeremy Robert JONES, Defendant.

No. COA18-700

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-020-1020-PK] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

A meeting will be held November 16, 2005, at the Bureau of Land Management Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101, beginning at 8 a.m. The public comment period will begin at 11:30 a.m. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in eastern Montana.  All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided below. The Council will hear updates on the Miles City Resource Management Plan, the Pryor Mountain PZP appeal, and other issues.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Apple, Resource Advisory Council Coordinator, Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101, telephone 406-896-5258 or Sandra S. Brooks, Field Manager, Billings Field Office, telephone 406-896-5013. 

Dated: October 4, 2005. 

Sandra S. Brooks, 

Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 05-20384 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210-$$-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Courtney Michelle SMITH, Defendant.

No. COA18-421

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
Linda BYRD-RUSS v. Nefertiti BYRD

No. 100P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Linda Gail Byrd, for Byrd, Linda

Nefertiti A. Byrd, for Byrd, Nefertiti

Harold Warren Freeman, III

Ronald Ivo Paige, Jr.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of March 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of March 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of March 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."