alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4932 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4932

 To waive temporarily the matching amount requirement with respect to 
     section 21 of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2010

 Mr. Kratovil introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive temporarily the matching amount requirement with respect to 
     section 21 of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Development Centers 
Relief Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. MATCHING REQUIREMENT WAIVER.

    During the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall waive 
the requirement under subsection (a)(4)(A) of section 21 of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) that a matching amount be provided as a 
condition of grants under such section. Notwithstanding subsection 
(a)(4)(C)(ii) of such section, the amount of a grant under such section 
during such period may exceed the amount of matching funds provided.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Autostrada  Motors,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  We,  Douglas W. Fry,  President  and  director  and Travis T. Jenson,
Secretary,Treasurer, CFO and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


By/S/ Douglas W. Fry
-----------------
Douglas W. Fry
President and Director
Dated this 11th day of November, 2005


By/S/ Travis T. Jenson
-----------------
Travis T. Jenson
Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and Director
Dated this 11th day of November, 2005
#### Kevin J. CORDIA, a Minor, by and through his Next Friend, Parent and Guardian, Patricia CORDIA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ROCKWOOD R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 82003.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 22, 2003.

*871Thomas R. Carnes, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Celynda L. Brasher, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Cordia, the student, appeals the circuit court’s judgment affirming a decision by the Rockwood R-VI School Board permanently expelling him from the Rock-wood School District. The student argues that the school board’s decision was not supported by competent and substantial evidence proving that he brought a “projectile weapon” to school in violation of Rockwood School Board Policy JFCJ. We affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
In the MATTER OF: A.H.

No. COA18-624

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.02



Educate, Inc.



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Kevin E. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company),
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin E.
Shaffer

Name: Kevin E. Shaffer

Date: November 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACK M. HAMILTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3117

[June 4, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fithteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Colbath, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CF-004881-AXXX-MB.

Jack M. Hamilton, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 280A/9 Αυ

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 280A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 66ό έτος9 Αυγούστου 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 280A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

66ό έτος9 Αυγούστου 2023

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκή Υπηρεσία Επιλογής Προσωπικού (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 280 A/01 | Ανακοίνωση για την τροποποίηση της προκήρυξης γενικού διαγωνισμού — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Διοικητικοί υπάλληλοι (AD 6) στους ακόλουθους τομείς: 1. Μικροοικονομία/μακροοικονομία, 2. Χρηματοοικονομικά, 3. Βιομηχανική οικονομία ( ΕΕ C 220 A της 22.6.2023 ) | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκή Υπηρεσία Επιλογής Προσωπικού (EPSO)

2023/C 280 A/01

Ανακοίνωση για την τροποποίηση της προκήρυξης γενικού διαγωνισμού — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Διοικητικοί υπάλληλοι (AD 6) στους ακόλουθους τομείς: 1. Μικροοικονομία/μακροοικονομία, 2. Χρηματοοικονομικά, 3. Βιομηχανική οικονομία ( ΕΕ C 220 A της 22.6.2023 )

( ΕΕ C 220 A της 22.6.2023 )

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκή Υπηρεσία Επιλογής Προσωπικού (EPSO)

| 9.8.2023 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2023

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 280/1

---

Ανακοίνωση για την τροποποίηση της προκήρυξης γενικού διαγωνισμού — EPSO/AD/402/23 — Διοικητικοί υπάλληλοι (AD 6) στους ακόλουθους τομείς: 1. Μικροοικονομία/μακροοικονομία, 2. Χρηματοοικονομικά, 3. Βιομηχανική οικονομία

(
  Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 220 A της 22ας Ιουνίου 2023
  )

(2023/C 280 A/01)

Στη σελίδα 1:

| αντί: | «Προθεσμία υποβολής αιτήσεων: 25 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών» |
| --- | --- |

αντί:

«Προθεσμία υποβολής αιτήσεων: 25 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών»

| διάβαζε: | «Προθεσμία υποβολής αιτήσεων: 26 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών». |
| --- | --- |

διάβαζε:

διάβαζε

«Προθεσμία υποβολής αιτήσεων: 26 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών».

Στη σελίδα 5:

| αντί: | «Οι υποψήφιοι/-ες πρέπει να υποβάλουν την αίτηση ηλεκτρονικά στον
  ιστότοπο της EPSO (2)
  έως τις: 25 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών» |
| --- | --- |

αντί:

αντί

«Οι υποψήφιοι/-ες πρέπει να υποβάλουν την αίτηση ηλεκτρονικά στον
  ιστότοπο της EPSO (2)
  έως τις: 25 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών»

| διάβαζε: | «Οι υποψήφιοι/-ες πρέπει να υποβάλουν την αίτηση ηλεκτρονικά στον
  ιστότοπο της EPSO (2) έως τις: 26 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών.». |
| --- | --- |

διάβαζε:

διάβαζε

«Οι υποψήφιοι/-ες πρέπει να υποβάλουν την αίτηση ηλεκτρονικά στον
  ιστότοπο της EPSO (2) έως τις: 26 Ιουλίου 2023 στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι, ώρα Βρυξελλών.».

---

(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/el/job-opportunities/open-for-application

2

---
#### In the Matter of Phillip DeJohne E. and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Amarley E., Appellant; Little Flower Children’s Services, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 85]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about January 4, 1999, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject children and transferring their guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that, notwithstanding some contact that took place between respondent and her children after her incarceration, she failed to offer a viable resource, and otherwise failed to plan for the children’s future despite the agency’s diligent efforts to assist her in that regard (see, *Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 142-143; *Matter of Taqueena Louise C.,*222 AD2d 283, *lv denied*87 NY2d 812). The finding that it is in the children’s best interests to be adopted by their foster parent is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, including respondent’s life sentence, the absence of an alternative resource and a foster home in which the children have been living and thriving, since respondent’s incarceration in the case of the older child, and since her birth in prison in the case of the younger. Concur — Rosenberger, J, P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Knight Energy Corp. (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
      J. Bosso, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,





i.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





ii.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                WILLIAM J. BOSSOWilliam
                J. Bosso, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                March 31, 2008
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Universal Ice Blast, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, (the Form 10-KSB) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:

/S/   RORY CLARKE

Rory Clarke

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





March 26, 2003



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
American National Financial, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-64894) on Form S-8 of American National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries of
our report dated February 21, 2002, relating to the Consolidated Balance Sheets
of American National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001
and 2000 and the related Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive
Earnings, Shareholders' Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K of American National Financial, Inc.

KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 21, 2002



                                       1
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon W. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Jon W. ClarkName:
              Jon
      W. ClarkTitle:
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  August
      6, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Trim Holding Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Louis Bertoli, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Louis Bertoli       |
|-------------------------|
| Louis Bertoli           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| May 23, 2011            |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

                                                                        

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00022

- CV

Desirold Bennett, Appellant

v.

Colonial Property Agent for J. Michael Burbige, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL C OUNTY

NO. 88462, THE HONOR ABLE JEANNE PARKER, JU DGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 8, 2019 . On June 14, 2019 , this

Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to fi le

a satisfactory response by June 24, 2019

, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of

prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 2, 2019
#### Sparks & Tye, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*David Burgheim, defendant in error.

Section 3987 of the Revised Code, requiring the plaintiff in *certiorari*to .give the opposite party in interest written notice of the sanction of the writ, and time and place of hearing, at least ten days before the sitting of the Court to which it is returnable, etc., etc., applies to *ccrtioraris*from the Justice Courts, and is still of force under the Constitution of 1868.

*Certiorari.*Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court, October Term, 1870.

Sparks *&*Tye sued Burgheim in a Justice’s Court; he pleaded a set-óff, and obtained a judgment against them. They sued out a *certiorari,*returnable to October Term of said Court. Sparks *&*Tye’s counsel filed exceptions to the Justice’s answer thereto. When they were about to argue these exceptions, Burgheim’s counsel moved to dismiss the *168*certiorari,*because he had not been notified of the sanction of the writ, and of the time and place of hearing, ten days prior to the said term of said Court. (It was admitted that such ■ notice was given during said term.) Sparks & Tye’s eoun-. sel said this motion was out of order. The Court said it was not. They then proposed that time be given to Burglieim’s counsel, if said notice was too recent. But this the Court refused, and dismissed the *certiorari*for want of such notice prior to the term. This is assigned as error.

Mynatt *&*Dell, for plaintiffs in error.

Section 3987 not applicable to Justices’ Courts. The question is not settled by 34th Ga. R., 122, or 36th, 523. The Act was passed in 1861. Section 3787 applies to Inferior and Ordinary Courts. See rule as to Justices’ Courts. Rule S. C., No. 15, “Final Judgment,” in section 3995, applies to Justices’ Courts: 17th Ga. R., 429. Trial on merits favored: 30th Ga., R., 675-8; 36th, 393. The notice given was substantial compliance: 36th Ga. R., 396. The “time and place” of hearing is fixed by law, for the writ is returnable to term. The ten days means ten before the *hearing,*and not before Court sits.

John Milledge, Jr., for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

There is nothing, either in the language nor in the object of section 3987 of the Code to confine its operation to any *particular*writs of *certiorari.*Indeed, the propriety of some kind of notice to the other side is very evident. We think the statute is rather rigid in the consequences which it imposes upon failure, but such is the law, and we are bound by it. We are unable to see why the fact that all writs of *certiorari*are to be sanctioned by the Judge under the new Constitution can affect the question. Notice is just as necessary now as it was when the *certiorari*issued, as a matter of course.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7554

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY LEE FEWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-284, CA-96-444-3-P)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lee Fewell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions where the United States

is a party have sixty days within which to file in the district

court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when

the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on April 30, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 1997, which is

beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability,

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Collexis Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D.
Kirkland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




May 20,
2009




/s/
      William D. KirklandWilliam
      D. KirklandChief
      Executive Officer