alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas GutierrezThomas GutierrezPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


November 13, 2006
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Donald Anthony GERACI, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 10, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of July 2003, we DENY this Petition for Allowance of Appeal. *See Commonwealth v. Grant,*— Pa. -, 821 A.2d 1246 (2003) (denial of reargument).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report
of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Zalman, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/S/    DAVID
ZALMAN                                           
|David Zalman Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

March 1, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Heriberto FRAGOSO-GASTELLUM, Appellant.

No. 71-2413.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 6, 1972.

Matthew N. Lees (argued), S. Randolph Seymour, of Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Michael E. Quinton, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Acting Chief, Criminal Div., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and LYDICK* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Lawrence T. Lydick, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Fragoso-Gastellum was indicted on seven counts of unlawful transportation of and conspiracy to transport aliens who were illegally in the United States. As a result of plea bargaining, he pleaded guilty to an information charging him with aiding an alien to enter the country illegally. He had counsel when the district court questioned him thoroughly on his understanding of the constitutional rights he was waiving, the sentencing possibilities and his admitted guilt, and when his plea was entered. The other seven counts were dropped.

Before sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea of guilty, which the district court denied. He was sentenced to six months imprisonment. He appeals.

Withdrawal of a guilty plea is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. The district court determined that there was a factual basis for the charge and that Fragoso-Gastellum *1288made a voluntary plea with knowledge and understanding of the consequences of his plea and the possible sentence.

We find no abuse of discretion here. United States v. Youpee, 419 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1969); Vasquez v. United States, 279 F.2d 34 (9th Cir. 1960).

Affirmed.
#### John W. English, W. M. Pepper and E. D. Turner, as Receivers for the Florida Bank and Trust Company; Arthur T. Vanderbilt and Charles G. Wilson, as Receivers of the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, a Corporation, etc., *Appellants,*v. Lucretia Taylor, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 10, 1928.

*Evans Haile,*for Appellants;

*C. B. Layton*and *Frecl D. Bryant,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 listed below of RTI
International Metals, Inc. of out report dated January 27, 1999, appearing on
page 23 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
 
     File No. 33-36248 Relating to the RMI 1989 Stock Option Incentive Plan
 
    File No. 33-38340 Relating to the RMI Bargaining Unit Employees Savings and
    Investment Plan
 
     File No. 33-38339 Relating to the RMI Savings and Investment Plan
 
     File No. 33-63025 Relating to the RMI Titanium Company 1995 Stock Plan
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 29, 1999
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4911 

To repeal specific provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2010 

Mr. COOPER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal specific provisions in the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Deals for 

5 Deficit Reduction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS IN PPACA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of the enactment of 

8 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the provi9 sions of such Act specified in subsection (b) are repealed, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4911 IH

1 and the provisions of law amended or repealed by the pro2 visions so specified are restored or revived as if such speci3 fied provisions had not been enacted. 

4 (b) PROVISIONS SPECIFIED.—The provisions speci5 fied in this subsection are the following provisions within 

6 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: 

7 (1) Section 2006 (relating to special adjustment 

8 to FMAP determination for certain States recov9 ering from a major disaster). 

10 (2) Section 3201(g) (relating to grandfathering 

11 supplemental benefits for current enrollees after im12 plementation of competitive bidding). 

13 (3) Section 10201(e)(1) (relating to DSH allot14 ment adjustment). 

15 (4) Section 10323 (relating to Medicare cov16 erage for individuals exposed to environmental 

17 health hazards). 

18 (5) Section 10324 (relating to protections for 

19 frontier States). 

20 (6) Section 10502 (relating to infrastructure to 

21 expand access to care). 

22 (7) Section 10905(c) (relating to exemption 

23 from annual fee on health insurance for certain non24 profit entities). 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4911 IH

1 (8) Section 10905(d) (relating to certain insur2 ance exempted from fee). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 8, 2001 (relating to the consolidated financial statements of
DaimlerChrysler Corporation not presented separately herein), included as
Exhibit 10.3 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of DaimlerChrysler AG for the
year ended December 31, 2001, in the following Registration Statements:

<Table>
<Caption>
                        REGISTRATION
FORM                    STATEMENT NO.   ISSUER
----                    -------------   ------
<S>                     <C>             <C>
F-3                     333-13160       DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corporation
S-8                     333-5074        DaimlerChrysler AG
S-8                     333-7082        DaimlerChrysler AG
S-8                     333-8998        DaimlerChrysler AG
S-8                     333-86934       DaimlerChrysler AG
S-8                     333-86936       DaimlerChrysler AG
</Table>

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
September 25, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 28, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 28, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0153. GEORGE M. NEMCHIK et al. v. TONY MICHAEL RIGGS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

151819142
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONALD C. PETRA,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 696 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11122

Summary Calendar

 

OILLE FITZGERALD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

versus

LUBBOCK COUNTY, TX.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

RICHARD HAYNES; JOSEPH LANZA; 

JOHN S. POWELL, STEVE SUMNER;

REBECCA HAMILTON,

Appellants.

________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:00-CV-255-C

________________________________________________

March 8, 2002

Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Haynes, Joseph Lanza, John S. Powell, Steven Sumner, and Rebecca

Hamilton, attorneys for Ollie Fitzgerald Johnson, appeal a sanction order imposed
1See Scaife v. Associated Air Center, Inc., 100 F.3d 406, 411 (5th Cir. 1996).

2

by the district court, warning that future misconduct would warrant the imposition of

severe sanctions. They contend that the sanction order is too ambiguous to be

enforceable. They also maintain that the district court did not make a specific

finding that their actions constituted misconduct or a disruption in the district court’s

proceedings. The record reflects that the district court did make a specific finding

that the appellants made misrepresentation to the court by misquoting the language

of the court’s previous orders to file a more definite statement regarding their fraud

claims, and by omitting certain language from the previous orders. The district

court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a warning that any future misconduct by

the appellants would warrant the imposition of sanctions.1

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syntony Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Michael Vardakis, President and Treasurer and Matthew C. Lords, Vice President
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 8/13/2004                          /s/Michael Vardakis
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Michael Vardakis
                                         President, Treasurer and director


Date: 8/13/2004                          /s/Matthew C. Lords
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Matthew C. Lords
                                         Vice President, Secretary and
                                         director
EXHIBIT 23.1












Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









Board of Directors and Stockholders


Mission West Properties, Inc.


Cupertino, California




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC Nos. 333-133335 and 333-52835-99, and Form S-8, SEC File Nos. 333-80369 and 333-123466 of Mission West Properties, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements, schedules and the effectiveness of Mission West Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.









\S\ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.







San Francisco, California


March 16, 2011
STATE of North Carolina v. Karl Andrew BAKER, Defendant.

No. COA17-1354

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: October 21, 2005

US Precious Metals, Inc.

/s/ Jack Wagenti
Jack Wagenti
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Peter Toscano
Peter Toscano
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1


                 AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                           PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation shall be "Park-Ohio Industries, Inc."

     SECOND: The place in the State of Ohio where the principal office of the
Corporation will be located is Cleveland, in Cuyahoga County.

     THIRD: The purpose for which the Corporation is formed is to engage in any
lawful act or activity for which corporations may be formed under Sections
1701.01 to 1701.98, inclusive, of the Revised Code of Ohio, as now in effect or
hereinafter amended.

     FOURTH: The authorized number of shares of the Corporation is 100, all of
which shall be common stock, par value $1 per share.

     FIFTH: Without derogation from other power to purchase shares of the
Corporation, the Corporation by action of its directors may purchase
outstanding shares of any class of the Corporation to the extent not prohibited
by Law.

     SIXTH: No holders of any class of shares of the Corporation shall have any
pre-emptive right to purchase or have offered to them for purchase any shares
or other securities of the Corporation.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00087

- CV

JONAH WARD APPELLANT

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A

. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

- -----------

On August 6, 2012 , we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of

appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175

filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $175

filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28, 2007, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 6

, 2 012

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regar ding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing

fees in courts of appeals).
**Exhibit 32.2****CFO CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), JeffreyT. Soukup, the Chief Financial Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, tothe best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, and to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.     **InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 11th day ofAugust 2005.     /s/ Jeffrey T. Soukup     Jeffrey T. Soukup
Exhibit 31.1

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P.
Certification

I, Mitchell E. Hersh, Chief Executive Officer of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, the general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., certify
that:

|Date: March 9, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/MITCHELL E. HERSHMitchell E. Hersh
Chief Executive Officer of
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,
the general partner of
Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-51926) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-57486, 333-44794, 333-38078 and 333-93423) pertaining to the 2000 International Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock Option Plan, the
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan of Maxygen, Inc., of our report dated February 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Maxygen, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.





| | /s/ | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| | --- | -----------------




Palo Alto, California


March 22, 2002
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 PlanetOut Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except ratios)
 Six monthsYear ended December 31,
    
    
    ended2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    June 30, 2006Net income (loss) from
operations as reported
    
    $
    (15,644
    )
    
    $
    (7,807
    )
    
    $
    (423
    )
    
    $
    449
    
    
    $
    2,043
    
    
    $
    (321
    )Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    836
    
    
    
    112
    
    
    
    193
    
    
    
    1,713
    
    
    
    238
    
    
    
    398Earnings as defined
    
    $
    (14,808
    )
    
    $
    (7,695
    )
    
    $
    (230
    )
    
    $
    2,162
    
    
    $
    2,281
    
    
    $
    77Fixed charges
    
    $
    836
    
    
    $
    112
    
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    1,713
    
    
    $
    238
    
    
    $
    398Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    9.6
    x
    
    
    0.2
    x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing
income (loss) from operations plus fixed charges by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization
of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments under
operating leases that we believe to be representative of
interest. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges in
2001 through 2003 by amounts equal to the net loss for the
period.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFPAYPHONE WIND DOWN CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, MICHAEL H. McCLELLAN,am the Chief Financial Officer of Payphone Wind Down Corporation (the “Company”).

 

This certification isbeing furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”).

 

I hereby certify that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2007 |                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|
|                     |                     |
|                     | /s/ MICHAEL H. MCCLELLAN |   |
|                     | Michael H. McClellan     |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Payphone WindDown Corporation and will be retained by Payphone Wind Down Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----