United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Alpharetta, GA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 19-1570

Issued: June 1, 2020

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On July 17, 2019 appellant filed a timely appeal from a June 21, 2019 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act1and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits 

of this case.2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $41,177.89, for which he was not at fault, as he 

concurrently received Social Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits while 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

2 The Board notes that, following the June 21, 2019 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that 

was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board 

for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional 

evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

receiving FECA wage-loss compensation for the period May 20, 2011 through March 30, 2019; 

(2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment; and (3) whether 

OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $404.00 from appellant’s 

continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On January 23, 1999 appellant, then a 56-year-old mail processing clerk, filed a traumatic 

injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on that date he sustained an injury to the right side of his 

head when he was struck by a coworker while in the performance of duty. OWCP initially 

accepted the claim for cervical strain, lumbar strain, and right face contusion and laceration, and 

later expanded acceptance of the claim to include the additional conditions of lumbar spondylosis 

with myelopathy and lumbar spinal stenosis. 

Appellant stopped work on January 23, 1999 and returned to work on March 6, 1999 in a 

full-time light-duty position. The record reveals that the employing establishment no longer had 

light-duty work available for him and recommended that he be placed on the periodic rolls. OWCP 

paid appellant compensation benefits on the supplemental rolls from May 20, 2011 and on the 

periodic rolls for wage-loss compensation as of June 5, 2011. 

In an EN1032 form dated January 16, 2012, appellant indicated that he had not received

SSA benefits as part of an annuity for federal service; however, he also noted receipt of Social 

Security benefits as of December 15, 2011 when he reached 65 years and 10 months of age. He

continued to indicate that he had not received SSA benefits as part of an annuity for federal service 

in EN1032 forms dated through March 18, 2019. 

On March 13, 2019 OWCP provided SSA with a Federal Employees Retirement System 

(FERS)/SSA dual benefits calculation form. On March 18, 2019 it received a transmittal in which 

SSA submitted the completed form which showed SSA benefit rates with a FERS offset and 

without a FERS offset from October 2008 through December 2018. Beginning December 2010, 

the SSA rate with FERS was $1,359.60, and without FERS was $948.00. Beginning 

December 2011, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,449.80 and without FERS was $982.10. 

Beginning December 2012, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,483.70 and without FERS was 

$998.70. Beginning December 2013, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,505.90 and without FERS 

was $1,013.60. Beginning December 2014 through December 2015, the SSA rate with FERS was 

$1,536.60 and without FERS was $1,030.80. Beginning December 2016, the SSA rate with FERS 

was $1,541.20 and without FERS was $1,033.80. Beginning December 2017, the SSA rate with 

FERS was $1,572.00 and without FERS was $1,054.40. Beginning December 2018, the SSA rate 

with FERS was $1,616.00 and without FERS was $1,083.90. 

In a letter dated April 9, 2019, OWCP informed appellant that it would begin deducting 

the portion of SSA benefits attributable to his federal service from his 28-day periodic 

compensation beginning March 31, 2019. 

On April 25, 2019 OWCP issued a preliminary determination that appellant was overpaid 

compensation in the amount of $41,777.89 for the period May 20, 2011 through March 30, 2019

because the SSA/FERS offset was not applied to payments for this period. It determined that he 
3

was without fault in the creation of the overpayment because he relied on misinformation given in 

writing by OWCP as to the interpretation of FECA or its regulations, there was documentation to 

substantiate that the misinformation was communicated to him, and that there was no evidence in 

the case file to demonstrate that he knew or should have known the proper course of action to be 

followed. OWCP requested that appellant submit a completed overpayment action request and

overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) to determine a fair repayment method, and 

advised him that he could request a waiver of recovery of the overpayment. It requested that he 

provide supporting financial documentation, including copies of income tax returns, bank account 

statements, bills, pay slips, and any other records to support income and expenses. OWCP advised 

appellant that it would deny waiver if he failed to furnish the requested financial information within 

30 days. It further notified him that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, he could request a 

telephone conference, a final decision based on the written evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing. 

OWCP attached a FERS offset calculation form which demonstrated the 28-day FERS offset 

amount for the days in each period May 20, 2011 through March 30, 2019, and computed a total 

overpayment of $41,177.89. 

In a letter dated May 10, 2019, appellant requested copies of OWCP’s exchange with the 

SSA regarding his overpayment. He explained that he did not know he had checked the wrong 

box in his regular submission of EN1032 forms. 

In a letter dated May 14, 2019, appellant requested a copy of all OWCP records for the 

period of overpayment and requested more time to process the information requested by OWCP. 

On May 21, 2019 appellant requested that OWCP make a decision based on the written 

evidence regarding possible waiver of recovery of this overpayment. With his request, he returned 

an incomplete Form OWCP-20 overpayment recovery questionnaire. Appellant also included a 

letter dated May 13, 2019 from the SSA, which noted a regular monthly benefit amount of 

$1,616.00. 

By decision dated June 21, 2019, OWCP finalized its preliminary determination that 

appellant had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $41,177.89 because the 

SSA/FERS offset had not been applied to payments for the period May 20, 2011 through 

March 30, 2019. It found that he was without fault in the creation of the overpayment, but denied 

waiver of recovery of the overpayment, because he had not completed and returned OWCP’s 

overpayment recovery questionnaire. OWCP concluded that there was no evidence to substantiate 

that recovery of the overpayment would either defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity 

and good conscience. It indicated that the overpayment would be recovered by withholding 

$404.00 from his continuing compensation benefit payments every 28 days.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102 of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of 

duty.3 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive compensation. While an employee 

 

3 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).
4

is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, pay, or remuneration of any type from 

the United States.4

Section 10.421(d) of FECA’s implementing regulations requires that OWCP reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of SSA benefits that are attributable to federal service of 

the employee.5 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have to be adjusted for the 

FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA benefit earned as a federal employee 

is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of FECA benefits and federal retirement 

concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.6

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $41,177.89 as he concurrently received SSA age-related 

retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation for the period May 20, 2011 through 

March 30, 2019.

As noted, a claimant cannot receive concurrent FECA compensation for wage-loss and 

SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to federal service for the same period.7 The 

information provided by SSA accurately indicated that appellant had received SSA age-related 

retirement benefits that were attributable to his own federal service from May 20, 2011 through 

March 30, 2019. Thus, the record establishes that he received an overpayment of FECA wageloss compensation.8

To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of the SSA benefits that were 

attributable to federal service must be calculated. The Board finds that OWCP properly 

determined the amount of the overpayment. The SSA provided appellant’s SSA rate with FERS 

and without FERS during the applicable period. OWCP determined that the difference of the 

portion of SSA benefits attributed to his federal service needed to be offset against his FECA 

compensation benefits. It calculated that the lack of offset from May 20, 2011 through March 30, 

2019 resulted in an overpayment total of $41,177.89.

The Board has reviewed OWCP’s calculations and finds that it properly determined that 

appellant received prohibited dual benefits totaling $41,177.89, thus creating an overpayment of 

compensation in that amount, for the period from May 20, 2011 through March 30, 2019.

 

4

Id. at § 8116.

5 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see R.R., Docket No. 19-0104 (issued March 9, 2020); T.B., Docket No. 18-1449 (issued 

March 19, 2019); L.J., 59 ECAB 264 (2007).

6 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (February 3, 1997).

7 Supra note 5. See also N.B., Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019); A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued 

February 21, 2019).

8

Id.
5

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129 of FECA provides that an overpayment in compensation shall be recovered 

by OWCP unless “incorrect payment has been made to an individual who is without fault and 

when adjustment or recovery would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and 

good conscience.”

9

 Section 10.438 of OWCP’s regulations provides that the individual who 

received the overpayment is responsible for providing information about income, expenses, and 

assets as specified by OWCP. This information is needed to determine whether or not recovery of 

an overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. 

Failure to submit the requested information within 30 days of the request shall result in denial of 

waiver.10

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.

As OWCP found appellant without fault in the creation of the overpayment, waiver must 

be considered, and repayment is still required unless adjustment or recovery of the overpayment 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.11 Appellant, was 

afforded the opportunity to provide the appropriate financial information and documentation to 

OWCP.12

In its preliminary determination dated April 25, 2019, OWCP clearly explained the 

importance of providing the completed Form OWCP-20 overpayment recovery questionnaire and 

supporting financial documentation, to support listed income and expenses. It advised appellant 

that it would deny waiver of recovery of the overpayment if he failed to furnish the requested 

financial information within 30 days. Appellant, however, did not submit a completed Form 

OWCP-20 or submit sufficient financial information necessary for OWCP to determine if recovery 

of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or if recovery would be against equity and 

good conscience.

Consequently, as appellant did not submit the information required under 20 C.F.R.

§ 10.438, which was necessary to determine his eligibility for waiver, the Board finds that OWCP 

properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.13

 

9 5 U.S.C. § 8129.

10 20 C.F.R. § 10.438.

11 Id. at § 10.436.

12 Id. at § 10.438.

13 See T.E., Docket No. 19-0348 (issued December 11, 2019).
6

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3

The Board’s jurisdiction over recovery of an overpayment is limited to reviewing those 

cases where OWCP seeks recovery from continuing compensation under FECA.14 Section 

10.441(a) of the regulations15 provides: 

“When an overpayment has been made to an individual who is entitled to further 

payments, the individual shall refund to OWCP the amount of the overpayment as 

soon as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to same. If no refund 

is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of compensation, taking into account 

the probable extent of future payments, the rate of compensation, the financial 

circumstances of the individual, and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize 

any hardship.”

16

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3

The Board finds that OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$404.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

OWCP provided appellant a Form OWCP-20 with the April 25, 2019 preliminary 

determination. Appellant did not complete the overpayment recovery questionnaire or provide the 

necessary financial information to support his income and expenses prior to the final June 21, 2019 

overpayment decision. The overpaid individual is responsible for providing information about 

income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP.17 When an individual fails to provide 

requested financial information, OWCP should follow minimum collection guidelines designed to 

collect the debt promptly and in full.18 As appellant did not submit supporting financial 

documentation to OWCP as requested, the Board finds that there is no evidence of record to 

establish that OWCP erred in directing recovery of the $41,177.89 overpayment at the rate of 

$404.00 every 28 days from his continuing compensation payments.19

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of 

$41,177.89 for the period May 20, 2011 through March 30, 2019, for which he was without fault, 

 

14 See C.A., Docket No. 18-1284 (issued April 15, 2019); Albert Pineiro, 51 ECAB 310 (2000); Lorenzo Rodriguez, 

51 ECAB 295 (2000).

15 20 C.F.R. § 10.441(a).

16 Id.

17 Supra note 10.

18 See A.S., Docket No. 19-0171 (issued June 12, 2019); Frederick Arters, 53 ECAB 397 (2002); Federal (FECA) 

Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management, Final Overpayment Determinations, Chapter 6.400.3

(September 2018).

19 See E.K., Docket No. 18-0587 (issued October 1, 2018); S.B., Docket No. 16-1795 (issued March 2, 2017).
7

as he concurrently received FECA benefits and SSA age-related retirement benefits without an 

appropriate offset. The Board further finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment, and properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $404.00 every 28 

days from his continuing compensation payments.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 21, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: June 1, 2020

Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board