61226 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. In part 983, Subpart—Rules and 

Regulations is amended by adding new 

§ 983.138 to read as follows: 

§ 983.138 Samples for testing. 

Prior to testing, a sample shall be 

drawn from each lot and divided into 

two subsamples to be used to test 

pistachios for aflatoxin and for 

minimum quality. The lot subsamples 

shall be of sufficient weight to comply 

with Tables 1 and 2 of § 983.38 and 

Table 4 of § 983.39: Provided, That lots 

of pistachios which are intended for 

dyeing or color-coating shall be sampled 

for minimum quality after the dyeing or 

color-coating process. 

■ 3. In part 983, Subpart—Rules and 

Regulations is amended by adding 

§ 983.143 to read as follows: 

§ 983.143 Reinspection. 

(a) Any lot of inshell pistachios that 

is pin-picked, hand-sorted, color-sorted, 

and/or resized is considered to be 

‘‘materially changed.’’ Pistachios which 

are roasted, salted, flavored, air-legged, 

dyed, color-coated, cleaned, and 

otherwise subjected to similar processes 

are not considered to be materially 

changed. 

(b) Each handler who handles 

pistachios shall cause any lot or portion 

of a lot initially certified for aflatoxin, 

quality, and size requirements, and 

subsequently materially changed, to be 

reinspected for aflatoxin, quality, and 

size, and certified as new lots: Provided, 

That: 

(1) Pursuant to § 983.41(b) handlers 

exempted from minimum quality testing 

shall pull or have pulled representative 

lot samples for aflatoxin testing of any 

materially changed lots intended to be 

shipped into the domestic channels of 

commerce. Such representative lot 

samples shall be divided into two parts, 

one part shall be retested for aflatoxin 

and the other part shall be maintained 

for 90 days at the handler’s facilities. 

Handlers shall make the samples 

maintained for 90 days available for 

auditing by the Administrative 

Committee for Pistachios; and 

(2) Handlers exempted from order 

requirements under § 983.70 are 

exempted from all reinspection 

requirements. 

Dated: October 18, 2005. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–21167 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

9 CFR Part 77 

[Docket No. 04–068–3] 

Tuberculosis in Cattle and Bison; State 

and Zone Designations; New Mexico 

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as 

final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final 

rule, without change, an interim rule 

that amended the bovine tuberculosis 

regulations regarding State and zone 

classifications by removing New Mexico 

from the list of modified accredited 

advanced States, adding portions of two 

counties in New Mexico to the list of 

modified accredited advanced zones, 

and adding the remainder of the State to 

the list of accredited-free zones. We took 

this action based on our determination 

that New Mexico met the requirements 

of the regulations for zone recognition 

and that one of the zones met the 

criteria for designation as accreditedfree. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: The interim rule 

became effective on July 22, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

M.J. Gilsdorf, Director, Ruminant Health 

Programs, National Center for Animal 

Health Programs, VS, APHIS, 4700 River 

Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD 20737–

1231; (301) 734–6954. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In an interim rule effective and 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 22, 2005 (70 FR 42259–42261, 

Docket No. 04–068–1), we amended the 

tuberculosis regulations in 9 CFR part 

77 by removing New Mexico from the 

list of modified accredited advanced 

States in § 77.9(a), adding portions of 

two counties in New Mexico to the list 

of modified accredited advanced zones 

in § 77.9(b), and adding the remainder 

of the State to the list of accredited-free 

zones in § 77.7(b). 

On August 12, 2005, we published a 

document in the Federal Register (70 

FR 47078, Docket No. 04–068–2), 

correcting an error in the abovementioned rule. When we set out the 

revised § 77.9(a) in the July 2005 interim 

rule, we inadvertently included 

California on the list of modified 

accredited advanced States. California 

was added to the list of accredited free 

States in § 77.7(a) in an interim rule 

published in the Federal Register on 

April 15, 2005 (70 FR 19877–19878, 

Docket No. 05–010–1). Our August 2005 

document corrected that error by 

removing California from the list of 

modified accredited advanced States in 

§ 77.9(a). 

Comments on the interim rule were 

required to be received on or before 

September 20, 2005. We received one 

comment by that date. The comment 

was from a State agricultural agency. 

The commenter supported the interim 

rule. Therefore, for the reasons given in 

the interim rule, we are adopting the 

interim rule as a final rule. 

This action also affirms the 

information contained in the interim 

rule concerning Executive Order 12866 

and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 

Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and 

the Paperwork Reduction Act. 

Further, for this action, the Office of 

Management and Budget has waived its 

review under Executive Order 12866. 

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 77 

Animal diseases, Bison, Cattle, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Transportation, 

Tuberculosis. 

PART 77—TUBERCULOSIS 

■ Accordingly, we are adopting as a 

final rule, without change, the interim 

rule that amended 9 CFR part 77 and 

that was published at 70 FR 42259–

42261 on July 22, 2005, as corrected by 

the correcting amendment published at 

70 FR 47078 on August 12, 2005. 

Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of 

October 2005. 

W. Ron DeHaven, 

Administrator, Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–21082 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–34–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–21086; Directorate 

Identifier 2004–NM–217–AD; Amendment 

39–14344; AD 2005–21–06] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and 

–900 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 61227 

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C, 

–800, and –900 series airplanes. This 

AD requires repetitive inspections of the 

aft pressure bulkhead web for fatigue 

cracks, crack indications, discrepant 

holes, and corrosion; and repair if 

necessary. This AD results from reports 

of fatigue cracks in the aft pressure 

bulkhead web. We are issuing this AD 

to detect and correct such fatigue cracks, 

which could result in a rapid 

decompression of the airplane. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

November 25, 2005. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in the AD 

as of November 25, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401, 

Washington, DC. 

Contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 

Washington 98124–2207, for service 

information identified in this AD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98055–4056; telephone 

(425) 917–6430; fax (425) 917–6590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Examining the Docket 

You may examine the airworthiness 

directive (AD) docket on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility office 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The Docket Management Facility office 

(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building at 

the street address stated in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Discussion 

The FAA issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to all Boeing Model 737–600, 

–700, –700C, –800, and –900 series 

airplanes. That NPRM was published in 

the Federal Register on May 2, 2005 (70 

FR 22620). That NPRM proposed to 

require repetitive inspections of the aft 

pressure bulkhead web for fatigue 

cracks, crack indications, discrepant 

holes, and corrosion; and repair if 

necessary. 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We have 

considered the comments received. 

Supportive Comments 

Two commenters, including the 

manufacturer, support the proposed AD. 

Request To Add Provision for Special 

Flight Permits 

One commenter requests that the 

proposed AD be revised to include a 

phrase used in earlier ADs to permit the 

use of special flight permits. The 

commenter explains that, due to the 

number of work hours needed to gain 

access to the forward side of the aft 

pressure bulkhead, it needs to use the 

provisions for special flight permits. We 

infer that the commenter believes that 

because the proposed AD does not 

contain information on ferry flights, 

ferry flights are not allowed. 

We do not agree with the commenter’s 

request to add the special flight permit 

language, nor do we agree with the 

commenter’s inference that special 

flight permits are not allowed by this 

AD. Special flight permits are allowed 

unless limitations or prohibitions are 

specifically identified in the AD. For 

this AD there are no limitations or 

prohibitions. On July 10, 2002, we 

issued a new version of 14 CFR part 39 

(67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which 

governs the FAA’s airworthiness 

directives system. The regulation now 

includes material that relates to altered 

products, special flight permits (i.e., 

ferry flights), and alternative methods of 

compliance (AMOCs). Since we have 

now included this information in 14 

CFR part 39, information on special 

flight permits is not included in each 

individual AD unless there are 

limitations on special flight permits for 

an individual AD. We have not changed 

the AD in this regard. 

Request To Add Language That Advises 

Operators How To Address Pre-existing 

Repairs 

Another commenter requests that the 

proposed AD be revised to include 

language advising operators how to treat 

pre-existing repairs in the inspection 

area of the aft pressure bulkhead. The 

commenter justifies the request by 

noting that the ‘‘* * * bulkhead is the 

subject of numerous other service 

bulletins and other ADs, any or all of 

which may have resulted in the 

installation of repairs in the inspection 

area,’’ and that the absence of such 

advisory language would require 

AMOCs for each instance of pre-existing 

repairs. We infer that the commenter 

believes that the AD requires AMOCs 

for each pre-existing repair that prevents 

someone from complying with the 

requirements of the AD, and is 

requesting that the AD include specific 

language to provide relief for treating 

these pre-existing repairs. 

We understand the commenter’s 

concern about obtaining AMOCs for preexisting repairs, especially since there 

are three ADs that cover the inspection 

area. We concur with the commenter in 

this regard. As noted in the reply to the 

previous comment on special flight 

permits, we issued a new version of 14 

CFR part 39 on July 10, 2002. In section 

39.17, it states, ‘‘If a change in a product 

affects your ability to accomplish the 

actions required by the airworthiness 

directive in any way, you must request 

FAA approval of an alternative method 

of compliance.’’ This statement means 

that pre-existing repairs do not require 

AMOC approval unless they affect the 

operator’s ability to accomplish the 

actions of the AD. Since we cannot 

anticipate the wide variety of possible 

repair configurations, this is best 

handled by requesting an AMOC for 

each repair. We have not changed the 

AD in this regard. 

Request To Query Boeing for 

Availability of Parts 

One commenter notes that certain 

repairs would require replacement of 

sections of curved structural members 

that are difficult for operators to 

fabricate on short notice. The 

commenter suggests that Boeing should 

be queried for availability of 

replacement materials in the event that 

an inspection finds the need for 

corrective action. 

We agree that certain parts may be 

difficult for operators to fabricate on 

short notice (i.e., before further flight). 

We contacted Boeing about parts 

availability in regard to this AD, and 

have confirmed that a sufficient 

quantity of parts is available. We 

encourage operators to contact Boeing 

for specific information on parts 

availability. We have not changed the 

AD in this regard. 

Request to Operator for Additional 

Repair Guidance 

One commenter requests that Boeing 

provide additional repair guidance other 

than ‘‘contact Boeing.’’ The commenter 

notes that the manufacturer has 

previous experience in addressing 

similar repairs in the area to be 

inspected in accordance with this AD. 

The commenter acknowledges that 

every repair is different, but believes 

that a repair drawing or structuralrepair-manual-type of repair should be 

61228 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

made available. The commenter also 

states that it is impractical to contact 

Boeing in an airline’s operational 

environment. 

We acknowledge the commenter’s 

request. We understand that general 

repair information applicable to this AD 

would help operators plan for any 

potential corrective action. We have 

coordinated this issue with Boeing. 

However, in this particular area, it is 

difficult to develop specific guidelines 

for the various conditions that an 

operator may encounter. Although no 

general repair information exists now (at 

time of publication), we remind 

operators that we may approve (if 

submitted and approved) repair 

drawings as allowed for in paragraph (i) 

of this AD, which describes ways to get 

approval of an alternative method of 

compliance (AMOC). We remind 

operators that they may apply for an 

AMOC in accordance with the 

provisions in paragraphs (i) and (g) of 

this AD. We have not changed the AD 

in this regard. 

Conclusion 

We have carefully reviewed the 

available data, including the comments 

received, and determined that air safety 

and the public interest require adopting 

the AD as proposed. 

Explanation of Change Made to This 

AD 

We have simplified paragraph (g) of 

this AD by referring to the ‘‘Alternative 

Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)’’

paragraph of this AD for repair methods. 

Clarification of Alternative Method of 

Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph 

We have revised this AD to clarify the 

appropriate procedure for notifying the 

principal inspector before using any 

approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies. 

Costs of Compliance 

There are about 978 airplanes of the 

affected design in the worldwide fleet. 

The following table provides the 

estimated costs for U.S. operators to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Work 

hours 

Average 

labor rate 

per hour 

Parts Cost per airplane 

Number of 

U.S.-registered 

airplanes 

Fleet cost 

LFEC and detailed inspection, 

per inspection cycle.

8 $65 None $520 per inspection cycle .. 630 $327,600 per inspection cycle. 

HFEC and detailed inspection 

(in lieu of LFEC and detailed inspection), per inspection cycle.

2 65 None $130 per inspection cycle .. 630 $81,900 per inspection cycle. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the National Government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

See the ADDRESSES section for a location 

to examine the regulatory evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by adding the following new 

airworthiness directive (AD): 

2005–21–06 Boeing: Amendment 39–14344. 

Docket No. FAA–2005–21086; 

Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–217–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective November 

25, 2005. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 

737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series 

airplanes, certificated in any category. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD was prompted by reports of 

fatigue cracks in the aft pressure bulkhead 

web. We are issuing this AD to detect and 

correct such fatigue cracks, which could 

result in rapid decompression of the airplane. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 61229 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspections 

(f) At the applicable ‘‘Inspection 

Threshold’’ in the table in Part 1.E. 

‘‘Compliance’’ of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 737–53A1248, dated September 9, 

2004, or within 18 months after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed the 

applicable ‘‘Inspection Repeat Interval’’ in 

that table: Do the inspections (i.e., detailed 

inspection and either high- or low-frequency 

eddy current inspections) of the aft pressure 

bulkhead web for fatigue cracks, crack 

indications, discrepant holes, and corrosion, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin. 

Corrective Action Difference 

(g) If any fatigue crack, crack indication, 

discrepant hole, or corrosion is found during 

any inspection required by this AD, before 

further flight, repair the fatigue crack, crack 

indication, discrepant hole, and corrosion 

according to a method approved by the 

Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), FAA; or using a method approved in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (i) of this AD. 

No Reporting 

(h) Although the service bulletin references 

a reporting requirement in the 

Accomplishment Instructions, that reporting 

is not required by this AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has 

the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, 

if requested in accordance with the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for corrective 

actions, if it is approved by an Authorized 

Representative for the Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization 

Organization who has been authorized by the 

Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those 

findings. For a repair method to be approved, 

the repair must meet the certification basis of 

the airplane, and the approval must 

specifically refer to this AD. 

(3) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify the 

appropriate principal inspector in the FAA 

Flight Standards Certificate Holding District 

Office. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(j) You must use Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 737–53A1248, dated September 9, 

2004, to perform the actions that are required 

by this AD, unless the AD specifies 

otherwise. The Director of the Federal 

Register approved the incorporation by 

reference of this document in accordance 

with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. 

Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207, 

for a copy of this service information. You 

may review copies at the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, 

Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at the NARA, 

call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

13, 2005. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–20966 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. 2000–NE–48–AD; Amendment 

39–14343; AD 2005–21–05] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Formerly 

Rolls-Royce Deutschland GmbH, 

formerly BMW Rolls-Royce GmbH) 

Models BR700–710A1–10 and BR700–

710A2–20 Turbofan Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an 

existing airworthiness directive (AD) for 

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG 

(RRD) (formerly Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland GmbH, formerly BMW 

Rolls-Royce GmbH) models BR700–

710A1–10 and BR700–710A2–20 

turbofan engines. That AD currently 

requires initial and repetitive visual and 

ultrasonic inspections of fan discs, part 

numbers (P/Ns) BRR18803, BRR19248, 

and BRR20791 for cracks, and if 

necessary, replacement with serviceable 

parts. This ad requires those same 

inspections for discs having old design 

P/N fan blades installed, and, extends 

the inspection interval for fan discs 

having new design P/N fan blades 

installed. Also, this AD adds as optional 

terminating action to the inspections, 

installation of certain P/N new fan 

discs, certain P/N new fan blades, and 

engine fan speed (N1) Keep Out Zone 

software. This AD results from a revised 

RRD service bulletin (SB) that 

introduces relaxed inspection intervals 

for certain P/N combinations of fan 

discs and fan blades, and introduces 

improved design fan discs and fan 

blades. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

November 25, 2005. The Director of the 

Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of certain 

publications listed in the regulations as 

of November 25, 2005. The Director of 

the Federal Register previously 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain other publications as listed in 

the regulations as of April 28, 2003 (68 

FR 17727, April 11, 2003). 

ADDRESSES: Contact Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 

11, 15827 Blankenfelde-Mahlow, 

Germany, telephone: 011 49 (0) 33–

7086–1768, fax: 011 49 (0) 33–7086–

3356, for the service information 

identified in this AD. 

You may examine the AD docket at 

the FAA, New England Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. You 

may examine the service information, at 

the FAA, New England Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine and 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–

5299; telephone: (781) 238–7747, fax: 

(781) 238–7199. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with 

a proposed AD. The proposed AD 

applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd 

& Co KG (RRD) (formerly Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland GmbH, formerly BMW 

Rolls-Royce GmbH) models BR700–

710A1–10 and BR700–710A2–20 

turbofan engines. We published the 

proposed AD in the Federal Register on 

July 5, 2005 (70 FR 38627). That action 

proposed to require initial and 

repetitive inspections for cracks in fan 

discs P/Ns BRR18803, BRR19248, 

BRR20791, BRR24829, and FW33929. 

That action also proposed as optional 

terminating action to the repetitive 

inspection requirements, installation of 

a new fan disc P/N FW33927, new fan 

blades P/N FW33513 or P/N FW33980, 

and N1 Keep Out Zone software. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD Docket 

(including any comments and service 

information), by appointment, between 

8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. See 

ADDRESSES for the location.