alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEDEDJI v. BONGOLO

29P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Ferdinand Ikende Bongolo, for Bongolo, Ferdinand Ikende.

M. Rachael Dimont, Attorney at Law, Chad Archer, Attorney at Law, Francoise Mededji, for Mededji, Francoise.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,344,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,471,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,895,684
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,922,168
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,911,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,376,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,487,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,898,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,376,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,424,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,067,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               341,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,356,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,256,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,865,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,865,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96
        
<FN>
Earnings before minority interest = $10,100,065
</FN>

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, November 25, 2005.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

      ( print page 60495)    

# Contact Person For More Information:

Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-20880  Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# EXHIBIT 32-2

# Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Earbanes-Oxly
Act of 2002

I, James W. Distelrath, Chief Financial
Officer of Clarkston Financial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 which this
          statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
          December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Clarkston Financial Corporation.

Dated: March __, 2006

| |  | /s/ James W. Distelrath

James W. DistelrathChief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit31.3**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John P. Longenecker,Ph.D., certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this amendment to the report on Form 10-Q of Favrille, Inc.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: October 30, 2007

 
| /s/ John P. Longenecker               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John P. Longenecker, Ph.D.            |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*       |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United
States Code





I, Kerry
W. Boekelheide, the Chief Executive Officer of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC
(“Summit”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of
Summit for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Summit.





/s/
      Kerry W. BoekelheideKerry
      W. BoekelheideChief
      Executive OfficerSummit
      Hotel Properties, LLCNovember
      16,
2009
DICKSON, et al v. RUCHO, et al

201PA12-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 2019

Phillip J. Strach, Michael D. McKnight, Attorneys at Law, for Rucho, Robert et al.

Edwin Speas, Caroline P. Mackie, Anita S. Earls, Attorneys at Law, for Dickson, Margaret, et al.

Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Thomas A. Farr, Attorney at law, Susan K. Nichols, James Bernier, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney Generals, John W. O'Hale, Guardian ad Litem, Clare Barnett, Charles E. Coble, Dorrian H. Horsey, Attorneys at Law, John F. Carella, Staff Attorney, for State of North Carolina, et al.

Allison J. Riggs, Adam Stein, Victor Goode, Jaclyn Maffetore, Irving Joyner, Attorneys at Law, for North Carolina State Conference Of Branches Of The NAACP, et al.

John A. Bussian, Attorney at Law, for NC Press Association, Inc., et al.

Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters, Inc.

*837Hugh Stevens, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Open Government Coalition, Inc.

Geraldine Sumter, Kareem Crayton, Terry Smith, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. Legislative Black Caucus.

David Lambeth, for David Lambeth.

Mark A. Finkelstein, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Attorneys at Law, for Election Law Professors.

H. Jefferson Powell, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Law Professors.

Jessica Ring Amunson, Leah J. Tulin, Michelle R. Singer, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

Meghann K. Burke, Michael E. Casterline, Theodore V. Wells, Jr., Robert A. Atkins, Jaren Janghorbani, Farrah R. Berse, Pietro Signoracci, Attorneys at Law, for Congressional Black Caucus.

The following order has been entered on the consent motion filed on the 4th of January 2019 to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of January 2019."

Earls, J. recused
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Irvin E. RichterIrvin E. RichterChief Executive Officer


Dated: May 8, 2008
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Travis T. Jenson, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of Autostrada Motors, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"), and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; and 

 

c) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

| *Date:*** | *05/09/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Travis T. Jenson***                            |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Travis T. Jenson, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO*** |
#### JEAN H. HIGH v. CLARENCE MARSHALL HIGH

No. 7411DC19

(Filed 6 March 1974)

Appeal by defendant from *Godwin, District Judge,*20 March 1973 Session of District Court held in Johnston County.

Action for alimony and support for two minor children. Plaintiff waived alimony. Defendant’s answer admitted that he had an annual salary of $7500.00 plus a bonus. On cross-examination, he admitted that his gross salary is $775.00 per month plus an annual bonus of approximately ten percent of his salary. The court awarded plaintiff exclusive possession of the former home of the parties, ordered defendant to pay the monthly installments on the indebtedness on that property in the amount of $212.00, ordered defendant to pay $50.00 per month for the support of each child, restrained defendant from going on the *101premises occupied by plaintiff and ordered defendant to pay plaintiff’s counsel $300.00.

*L. Austin Stevens for plaintiff appellee.*

*Corbett & Corbett by Albert A. Corbett, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

The testimony at trial was not officially recorded, and the case on appeal was finally settled by the trial judge. It may well be, as contended by defendant, that not all of the court’s findings of fact are supported by the record before us. It is clear, nevertheless, that the record does support those findings which are essential to the order entered and that no abuse of discretion has been shown.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
#### Benjamin Eisenberg, complainant-respondent, *v.*Plainfield Savings Bank, defendant-appellant.

[Submitted October 25th, 1946.

Decided February 4th, 1947.]

*Mr. Henry W.*Clement, for the appellant.

*Messrs. Neiucorn & Newcorn (Mr. William Neivcorn,^*of counsel), for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor. The delinquent taxes *308were paid before the filing of a bill to foreclose the mortgage, and before the mortgagee suffered any loss or impairment of his security.

Eespondent was given leave, on his motion, to print the pleadings, exhibits and other matter which he asserted were improperly omitted from the state of the case submitted by appellant, subject to the ruling of the court on the hearing of the cause on the merits as to the necessity therefor. We conclude such necessity existed, and that the cost thereof should be borne by appellant, and included in the taxed bill of costs.

*For affirmance*— Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Waci-ienbeld, Eastwood, Wells, Baeeerty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— Ti-ie Chieb-Justice, McG-eehan, McLean, JJ. 3.
J. 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court); see also NRS 34.020. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Gibbons 

J. 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 

Galloway & Jensen 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION



         In connection with the Annual Report of Solpower Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James H. Hirst, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.




Date:  May  29, 2007                   By: /s/ James H. Hirst
                                       ----------------------
                                       James H. Hirst
                                       Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                       Director and Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1755

In re: FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, a/k/a Dick,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:99-cr-00012-RLV-6; 5:02-

cv-00138-RLV)

Submitted: November 3, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Junior Powell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell petitions for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order compelling the district court to act on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion that was filed on November 4, 2002. Our 

review of the docket reveals that the district court dismissed 

Powell’s § 2255 motion on December 2, 2004, and we dismissed his 

appeal of the order on April 14, 2006. Accordingly, we deny the 

mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SPURGEON DUNCAN ISLEY

No. 7018SC319

(Filed 24 June 1970)

Criminal Law § 155.5— docketing of appeal beyond time allowed by order and rules

Where case on appeal was not docketed in the Court of Appeals until after the time allowed by an order of extension, and where the time of docketing was beyond the maximum 150 days allowed by Rule 5, the appeal is subject to dismissal.

Appeal by defendant from *Collier, J.,*27 October 1969 .Criminal Session, Guilford Superior Court.

Defendant was charged with first-degree murder by indictment returned at the May 1969 Session of court. Upon an indigency determination counsel was appointed to defend him. He was tried at the October 1969 Session. Upon the call of the case the solicitor announced that the State would not try the defendant for first-degree murder but would seek a conviction for murder in the second degree or a lesser included offense as the evidence might justify. Defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree and appealed. His trial counsel was appointed to prosecute his appeal to this Court.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Millard R. Rich, Jr., for the State.*

*Adam Younce for defendant appellant.*

MoRRis, J.

The judgment in this case was dated and entered on 31 October 1969. An order extending time for docketing the case on appeal was entered on 16 December 1969 extending the time to and including 28 March 1970. The case on appeal was not docketed in this Court until 13 April 1970. This was not within the time allowed by the order and was beyond the maximum 150 days allowed by Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Defendant has not applied for a writ of certiorari. The appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the Rules.

We have, nevertheless, carefully examined each of defendant’s assignments of error, and we find no prejudicial error. It clearly appears from the record that defendant was well and ably represented at his trial and his counsel has filed a carefully prepared brief and appeared and argued in his behalf. ■

*600Defendant has had a fair trial which was free from prejudicial error and his appeal has been considered on its merits.

No error.

MallaRd, C.J., and Graham, J., concur.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 199 / Monday, October 17, 2005 / Presidential Documents 60401 

Presidential Determination No. 2005–40 of September 28, 2005 

Transfers of Defense Articles or Services and Brokering 

Activities for Libya Relating to Disposition of Libyan-owned 

C–130H Aircraft 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of 

the United States, including sections 40(g) and 40A of the Arms Export 

Control Act (AECA), I hereby: 

• determine that the transaction, encompassing sales or licensing for 

export of defense articles or defense services and brokering activities necessary to assist in the disposition, including any required 

refurbishment, of Libyan-owned C–130H aircraft, is essential to the 

national security interests of the United States and important to 

the national interests of the United States; 

• waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related 

to such transaction; and 

• assign to you the functions under AECA section 40(g)(2) to consult 

with and submit reports to the Congress for proposed specific exports or transfers, 15 days prior to permitting them to proceed, that 

are necessary for and within the scope of this waiver determination 

and the transaction referred to herein. 

You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress 

and to arrange for its publication in the 

W 

Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 28, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–20855 

Filed 10–14–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
Rebecca R. DAVIS and Matthew M. Davis, Individually and on Behalf of Jeanette B. Davis, Trustor of the Jeanette B. Davis Revocable Trust Dated March 11, 2002; and Matthew M. Davis, on Behalf of His Children, Mallory Fay Davis and Matthew McCabe Davis, Jr. v. Janet D. RIZZO, Individually and as Trustee of the Jeanette B. Davis Revocable Trust Dated March 11, 2002; Anne Page Watson, and Intervenor Jeanette B. Davis

No. 321P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

R. Hayes Hofler, III, Tara D. Muller, Raleigh, Attorneys at Law, for Davis, Rebecca R., et al.

John N. Hutson, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Rizzo, Janet D.

Gary S. Parsons, Jessica B. Thaller-Moran, Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, for Watson, Anne Page

Catherine L. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Davis, Jeanette B.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 24th of September 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and *634is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD PEASLEE

No. 743SC959

(Filed 19 February 1975)

Appeal by defendant from *Thornburg, Judge.*Judgment entered 13 June 1974 in Superior Court, Carteret County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 February 1975.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Assistant Attorney General Charles M. Hensey for the State.*

*McCotter & Mayo by Charles K.'McCotter, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

MORRIS, PARKER, and HEDRICK, Judges.

No error.