alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Mark Joseph Corrao, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
        Mark Joseph Corrao*


*Mark
        Joseph Corrao*
 *Chief
        Financial Officer*
  *May
        23, 2006*
JAN 26 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

rr-s?ack7oM,'«VTmr
#### Charles R. PIERCE, Appellant, v. Cindy BRINKMAN a/k/a Cindy Webb, Appellee.

No. 1D02-5255.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 14, 2003.

Appellant, pro se.

Warren J. Bird, Tallahassee, for Appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 28, 2003, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, which reopened the case file following a nonfinal order dismissing appellant’s complaint without prejudice, did not end the judicial labor in the case nor bring a termination of the cause as between the parties. *See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb,*304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974); *Augustin v. Blount, Inc.,*573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ERVIN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Biotechnology Activities, Office of the Director; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a special 
meeting of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) 
that was held by teleconference on September 29, 2005. The Secretary 
determined that advance notice was not possible, and that the meeting 
had to be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.
    Under authority 42 U.S.C. 217a, Section 222 of the Public Health 
Service Act, as amended, the Department of Health and Human Services 
established NSABB to provide advice, guidance and leadership regarding 
Federal oversight of dual-use research, defined as biological research 
with legitimate scientific purposes that could be misused to pose a 
biological threat to public health and/or national security.

    Name of Committee: National Science Advisory Board for 
Biosecurity.
    Date: September 29, 2005.
    Closed: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review confidential information.
    Place: 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Allison Chamberlain, NSABB Program Assistant, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-9838.


    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20748 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Shemar FROST

No. 49P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 4, 2019

Shemar Frost, for Frost, Shemar.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 31st of January 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Onslow County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of February 2019."
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,843, AP-76,844, AP-76,845, AP-76,846, AP-76,847, AP-76,848,

AP-76,849, AP-76,850, AP-76,851, AP-76,852, AP-76,853, AP-76,854, AP-76,855,

AP-76,856, AP-76,857, AP-76,858, AP-76,859, AP-76,860

EX PARTE JAMES TIMOTHY BONHAM, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 26697, 26698, 26748, 26750, 26760, 26761, 26803, 26804, 26805, 26806,

26807, 26808, 26809, 26810, 26811, 26812, 26840 & 26841

IN THE 354 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HUNT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas

corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was

convicted of thirteen charges of forgery, four charges of fraudulent use or possession of

identifying information, and one charge of manufacture with intent to sell a counterfeit

instrument. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Applicant was sentenced to twenty years’
2

imprisonment for each charge. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends that his sentences are illegal because the enhancements alleged

in the indictments did not authorize his twenty-year sentences. We remanded the first

seventeen applications to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. After

remand, it is clear that Applicant’s sentences in the seventeen state jail felonies are illegal.

The trial court recommends granting relief. The State concedes that the case challenged in

the WR-77,224-18 writ application, in which applicant’s sentence is within the applicable

punishment range, was part of the same plea agreement that authorized the seventeen illegal

sentences. Applicant is entitled to relief in all of these cases.

Relief is granted. The judgments in Cause Nos. 26697, 26698, 26748, 26750, 26760,

26761, 26803, 26804, 26805, 26806, 26807, 26808, 26809, 26810, 26811, 26812, 26840, and

26841 in the 354 District Court of Hunt County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded

th

to the custody of the Sheriff of Hunt County to answer the charges as set out in the

indictments. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: August 22, 2012

Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6441
SHELDON K. PEELER, Petitioner - Appellant, versusSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-97-37-4-22) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sheldon K. Peeler, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Peeler v. South Carolina , No. CA-97-37-4-22 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

###### Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources (#1119).                    

*Date/Time:*                         November 2, 2005; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; November 3, 2005; 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Conference Room 375, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         James Colby, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-5331.                    

If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so your name may be added to the building access list.

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice with respect to the Foundation's education and human resources programming.                    

*Agenda:*

### November 2, 2005

Introduction of new Members.

Remarks by the Chair.

Presentation by the NSF Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OCI).

Presentation on the International Polar Year (IPY).

Discussion with Assistant Director.

Presentation on Evaluation and Discussion.

COV Reports and Discussion.

Staff will present a matrix of issues and recommendations that cut across all 10 COV Reports.

                        Discussion of                         *Dean's Meeting to Discuss Math & Science Teacher Preparation.*

### November 3, 2005

Table Discussion on Important Questions and Issues for the Director.

Visit with NSF Director.

Next Steps.

Closing Remarks.

Housekeeping Chore: Set future meeting dates.

Adjourn.

Dated: October 4, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20260 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7599-01-M
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Excellency
Investment Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008,
I, Richard Pelletier, Chief Financial Officer of Excellency Investment Realty
Trust, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.           Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Excellency Investment
Realty Trust, Inc.
  
 /s/ Richard PelletierRichard
      Pelletier, Chief Financial Officer ofExcellency
      Investment Realty Trust,
Inc.
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

401A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 29, 2018

Jennifer T. Harrod, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Teresa L. Townsend, Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney Generals, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Kiran H. Mehta, Molly McIntosh Jagannathan, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.

Matthew D. Quinn, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Sierra Club.

Peter H. Ledford, Attorney at Law, Benjamin Smith, Regulatory Counsel, for N.C. Sustainable Energy Association.

Gudrun Thompson, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

David L. Neal, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, Lucy E. Edmondson, Staff Attorney, Raleigh, for N.C. Utilities Commission-Public Staff.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 29th of November 2018 to Consolidate Appeals and to Enter Briefing Schedule:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of November 2018."
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, the chief financial officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate: October 28, 2009







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leopoldo Avila GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2452.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 13, 1972.

*1068Rush G. Glick, El Cajon, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen W. Peterson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Border officials at Calexico, California, discovered substantial amounts of marijuana and heroin secreted in an automobile driven by Avila-Gonzalez, the appellant. A jury found him guilty on two counts of violating 21 U.S.C. § 174 and two counts of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He received four concurrent five-year sentences. We affirm the conviction.

Appellant testified that he had borrowed the car from a friend and that he had no knowledge of the contraband until the border officials discovered it. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Numerous decisions in this circuit hold that knowing possession may be inferred from the act of driving a narcotics-laden automobile across the border. *See, e.g.,*United States v. Ascolani-Gonzalez, 449 F.2d 159 (9th Cir.1971); Eason v. United States, 281 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1960).

Appellant questions the applicability of the statutory presumption [21 U.S.C. § 174] to situations in which some doubt exists about the issue of knowing possession. Once the jury determines that a defendant knowingly possessed the heroin, it can legitimately apply the statutory presumption of § 174. Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 2 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970). We see no reason why the presumption should not apply with equal force when the element of possession is demonstrated by circumstantial rather than direct evidence.

 The appellant also claims that the Constitution guarantees him a jury composed at least in part of Mexican-Americans. A criminal defendant has no constitutional right to a proportionate number of his race or ethnic group on the jury that tries him. Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965). Appellant did not allege there was any systematic exclusion of Mexican-Americans from the jury panel.

The conviction is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John B. Roche, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ JOHN B. ROCHE Name:  John B. Roche
Title:Chief Financial Officer


November 10,
2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the report of China CGame, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Zhixin (Steven) XingZhixin (Steven) XingChief Executive OfficerAug 19, 2011/s/Qin (Andy) LuQin (Andy) LuActing Chief Financial OfficerAug 19, 2011


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China CGame, Inc. and will be retained by China CGame, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

 

EX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Premier Entertainment BiloxiLLC, (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

•                  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Forml0-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

•                  The information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated:May 13, 2005

 

 

 
|          /s/        Joseph L. Billhimer |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:          Joseph L. Billhimer                                         |   |
| Title:        Chief Operating Officer                                                |   |
|                                                                                                               |   |
|                                                                                                               |   |
|         /s/        Gregory J. Bosarge        |   |
| Name:         Gregory J. Bosarge                                                |   |
| Title:       Chief Financial Officer                                                      |   |

 

1

----