alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice advises all interested persons of the location of the October 18, 2005, public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform. This meeting was previously announced in 70 FR 57923 (October 4, 2005). 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, in Washington, DC, and will begin at 9 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center Amphitheater, Concourse Level, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX (927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail                         *info@taxreformpanel.gov*                         (please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is available at                         *http://www.taxreformpanel.gov*.                     

Dated: October 11, 2005. 

Mark S. Kaizen, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-20577 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4811-33-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Antwion Marquette WARREN, Defendant.

No. COA18-223

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-33730, 333-157308, and 333-154640) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-91589, 333-100515, 333-143502, and 333-160112) of MetroCorp
Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Houston, Texas                   
|March 18, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Wayne PRINCE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2387.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 16, 1972.

Bertrand C. Moser, Houston, Tex. (Court Appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Eldon B. Mahon, U. S. Atty., Charles D. Cabaniss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., W. Andrew Barr, Cecil Emerson, Asst. U. S. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Wayne Prince was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 659 for knowingly possessing 566 cases of stolen spark plugs while they were moving in interstate commerce from Toledo, Ohio to Dallas, Texas. On this direct appeal he contends that his conviction should be reversed because of the ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Our decision in United States v. Knight, 451 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1971) furnishes a prelude to this ease. That decision sets forth the background facts and the several contentions of the appellants, Bobby Ray Knight and Bobby Gene Grubbs, who were jointly indicted with Prince. Prince was tried separately and subsequently to the trials of Knight and Grubbs. When the case of Prince came on for trial, he and his counsel stated that they wished to incorporate by reference and to stipulate that the evidence presented to the court in the earlier trial would be submitted to the court as the evidence in the non-jury trial of Prince. Both Prince and his counsel assured the court that they understood and approved the stipulation. Prince was found guilty and sentenced to five years imprisonment.

Prince now contends that the record before us clearly demonstrates that his counsel did not render effective assistance and therefore that the judgment of conviction should be reversed. We disagree with this contention and conclude that Prince can not properly raise the issue of the adequacy of counsel for the first time on direct appeal. The record now before us does not present sufficient facts for a proper resolution and *1071determination of that issue. The question was not raised in the district court and no facts bearing upon the subject were presented to the trial court. The government has not had an opportunity to present evidence opposing the claims of Prince that his attorney was ineffective. United States v. Hunter, 417 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1969); Ortega-Lira v. United States, 406 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1969); Moore v. United States, 359 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1966).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed without prejudice to the right of Prince to raise the issue of the ineffective assistance of counsel in a proper proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 20, 2005, 5 p.m. to October 21, 2005, 2:30 p.m., Hilton Crystal City, 2399 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 28, 2005, 70 FR 56727-56729.                

The meeting is cancelled due to the reassignment of the applications.

Dated: October 6, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20736  Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM ANTHONY LAND AND HAROLD LEE BARROW

No. 7317SC232

(Filed 11 July 1973)

Appeal by defendants from *Seay, Judge,*9 October 1972, Session of Superior Court, Rockingham County.

Defendants were each charged, in indictments proper in form, with felonious breaking and entering and felonious larceny. They were represented at trial and are represented on appeal by court-appointed counsel furnished at the expense of the taxpayers. They pled not guilty, and the jury returned a verdict as to each of guilty of wrongful breaking and entering and felonious larceny. Each appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.

*Attorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Wood, for the State.*

*Benjamin R. Wrenn for defendant appellant Harold Lee Barrow.*

*J. S. Moore, Jr., for defendant appellant William Anthony Land.*

MORRIS, Judge.

A confederate of defendants’ testified that early in the evening of 24 December 1971, he entered the Sport Land Cycles building and took a minibike. He gained entrance by breaking a window with a rock wrapped in a shirt. After he got the window out, he entered through the window and took the bike out the back door. He then rode the bike down the Mispah Church Road to the trailer court where defendants lived. Barrow asked him where he got the bike and was told that it came from the Sport Land Cycles shop. Later Barrow said he wanted one, too; so Barrow and the witness “doubled” on the bike and went back to the Sport Land Cycles shop. They went in the back door, left unlocked by the witness, and got another motorcycle and a helmet. Later the witness, Barrow, and Land went back and again entered the shop and got another motorcycle for Land. They rode around a good part of the night and then hid the motorcycles, each in a different place. They later *679sold the motorcycles. Very shortly after the sale, they were arrested.

Defendants did not testify nor put on any evidence. On the breaking and entering count, each defendant was sentenced to a term of 24 months in the Rockingham County jail. On the felonious larceny count, each defendant was sentenced to a term of not less than five years nor more than seven years in the State Department of Correction.

Defendants do not bring forward any exceptions or assignments of error. The appeal itself, however, presents the face of the record for review.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error. The indictments were proper in form, the defendants were ably represented by competent counsel who adequately protected their rights, and the sentences imposed are within the statutory limits.

The judgments from which defendants appealed are

Affirmed.

Judges Brock and Vaughn concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         |                                   
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------
|                         | /s/Glenn D. Bolduc                
|                         | Glenn D. Bolduc                   
|                         | President, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: September 28, 2012 |                                   



This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated March 26, 2002, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CompuCredit Corporation and subsidiaries for the year
ended December 31, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form 10-K.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62012) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78409) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-92889) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated March 26, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CompuCredit
Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 18, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

          - 11 CFR Part 100 
          - [Notice 2005-25] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public hearing. 

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Election Commission is announcing a public hearing on the proposed changes to its rule defining “electioneering communications” under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. 

# DATES:

The hearings will be held on Thursday, October 20, 2005 and will begin at 9:30 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Commission hearings are held in the Commission's ninth floor meeting room, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Mai T. Dinh, Assistant General Counsel, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On August 24, 2005, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) proposing revisions to its rule defining “electioneering communications” under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. In the NPRM, the Commission stated it would hold a hearing on the proposed rules on October 19 and, if necessary, October 20, 2005. The Commission has determined that one day of public hearing will be sufficient. The hearing will be held on Thursday, October 20, 2005. 

Dated: October 13, 2005. 

Scott E. Thomas, 

Chairman, Federal Election Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05-20866 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on
        Form
        10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan,
        Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
        to
        the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 *Date:March
                  31, 2006*
                
                */s/
                  Michael S.
                  Egan*
                *Michael
                  S. Egan*
                *Chief
                  Executive Officer*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, George M. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and operating results of the Company. /s/ George M. LeeGeorge M. LeeChief Executive OfficerMarch 21, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anyone requiring information regarding the Committee should contact Peter C. van Dyck, M.D., M.P.H., Executive Secretary, ACIM, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Room 18-05, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-2170. 

                        Individuals who are submitting public comments or who have questions regarding the meeting should contact Ann M. Koontz, C.N.M., Dr. P.H., HRSA, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, telephone: (301) 443-6327, e-mail:                         *akoontz@hrsa.gov*.                     

Dated: January 31, 2005. 

Steven A. Pelovitz, 

Associate Administrator for Administration and Financial Management. 

[FR Doc. 05-2102 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDDIE WALLACE

No. 7226SC683

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Criminal Law § 161— failure to assign error on appeal — review of record proper

Where defendant presented no assignments of error, the appeal itself constituted an exception to the judgment; however, no error appeared on the face of the record proper.

Appeal by defendant from *Friday, Judge,*8 May 1972 Session of Mecklenburg Superior Court.

Defendant was charged in two bills of indictment with the offense of uttering forged checks, a felony prohibited by G.S. 14-120. The bills were consolidated for trial; defendant pleaded not guilty; the jury returned a verdict of guilty of both counts. Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of not less than three nor more than five years.

On this appeal defendant has presented no assignments of error.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Deputy Attorney General Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for the State.*

*Nelson M. Casstevens, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant having presented no assignments of error, the appeal itself is an exception to the judgment, *State v. Ayscue,*240 N.C. 196, 81 S.E. 2d 403 (1954) ; defendant’s exception to the judgment presents the face of the record for review, which review is ordinarily limited to the question of whether error of law appears on the face of the record and whether the judgment is regular in form, *State v. Kirby,*276 N.C. 123, 171 S.E. 2d 416 (1970) ; when no error appears on the face of the record proper, and the judgment is within the statutory limitations prescribed and is predicated upon a verdict sufficient to support it, the judgment must be affirmed, *State v. Darnell,*266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800 (1966), and *State v. Sloan,*238 N.C. 672, 78 S.E. 2d 738 (1953).

*646There is no error within the record proper. Defendant was sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of five years, well within the ten years authorized by G.S. 14-120.

No error.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.
Exhibit 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-75487, 333-91589 and 333-94327 of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-33730 of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 20,
2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.





/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Houston, Texas


March 28, 2002