Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 60769 

(f) Ultrafiltered milk means raw or 

pasteurized milk that is passed over one 

or more semipermeable membranes to 

partially remove water, lactose, 

minerals, and water-soluble vitamins 

without altering the casein:whey protein 

ratio of the milk and resulting in a 

liquid product. 

(g) Ultrafiltered nonfat milk means 

raw or pasteurized nonfat milk that is 

passed over one or more semipermeable 

membranes to partially remove water, 

lactose, minerals, and water-soluble 

vitamins without altering the 

casein:whey protein ratio of the nonfat 

milk and resulting in a liquid product. 

Dated: October 7, 2005. 

Leslye M. Fraser, 

Director, Office of Regulations and Policy, 

Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 05–20874 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[R05–OAR–2005–IN–0003; FRL–7981–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a request from the Indiana Department 

of Environmental Management (IDEM) 

to revise the Indiana State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) in three 

areas: To amend the definition of 

‘‘particulate matter,’’ and ‘‘ambient air 

quality standards,’’ add new rules 

consistent with these amended 

definitions, and amend rules pertaining 

to sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen 

dioxide (NO2) ambient standards; to 

update the references to the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) from the 2000 

edition to the 2002 edition; and to add 

‘‘credible evidence provisions’’ into 

state rules consistent with federal 

requirements. 

In the final rules section of this 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal, because EPA 

views this as a noncontroversial 

revision and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If we do not receive any adverse 

comments in response to these direct 

final and proposed rules, we do not 

contemplate taking any further action in 

relation to this proposed rule. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, we will 

withdraw the direct final rule and will 

respond to all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before November 18, 

2005. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by Regional Material in 

EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005–

IN–0003 by one of the following 

methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Agency Web site: http:// 

docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s 

electronic public docket and comment 

system, is EPA’s preferred method for 

receiving comments. Once in the 

system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key 

in the appropriate RME Docket 

identification number. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. 

Fax: (312) 886–5824. 

Mail: You may send written 

comments to: 

John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria 

Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

Hand delivery: Deliver your 

comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 

Criteria Pollutant Section (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office’s normal 

hours of operation. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m. excluding federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–IN–0003. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through RME, regulations.gov, 

or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and 

the Federal regulations.gov Web site are 

‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through RME or 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the public docket and made 

available on the Internet. If you submit 

an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to section I(B) 

of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the RME 

index at http://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in RME or 

in hard copy at Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 

Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

(Please telephone Julie Henning at (312) 

886–4882 before visiting the Region 5 

Office.) 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

Henning, Environmental Protection 

Specialist, State and Tribal Planning 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 

(312) 886–4882. Henning.julie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My 

Comments for EPA? 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

III. Where Can I Find More Information 

About This Proposal and the 

Corresponding Direct Final Rule? 

I. General Information 

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI 

to EPA through RME, regulations.gov or 

e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of 

the information that you claim to be 

CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD 

ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the 

outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI 

and then identify electronically within 

the disk or CD ROM the specific 

60770 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comment that includes information 

claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment 

that does not contain the information 

claimed as CBI must be submitted for 

inclusion in the public docket. 

Information so marked will not be 

disclosed except in accordance with 

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

a. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

b. Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

c. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

d. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

e. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

f. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

g. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

h. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

EPA is proposing to approve revisions 

to the Indiana SIP in three areas: (1) To 

amend the definition of ‘‘particulate 

matter,’’ and ‘‘ambient air quality 

standards,’’ add new rules consistent 

with these amended definitions, and 

amend rules pertaining to SO2 and NO2

ambient standards; (2) to update the 

references to the Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) from the 2000 edition 

to the 2002 edition; and (3) to add 

credible evidence provisions into state 

rules consistent with federal 

requirements. 

III. Where Can I Find More Information 

About This Proposal and the 

Corresponding Direct Final Rule? 

For additional information, see the 

Direct Final Rule which is located in the 

Rules section of this Federal Register. 

Copies of the request and the EPA’s 

analysis are available electronically at 

RME or in hard copy at the above 

address. (Please telephone Julie 

Henning at (312) 886–4882 before 

visiting the Region 5 Office.) 

Dated: September 23, 2005. 

Norman Niedergang, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 05–20820 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Maritime Administration 

46 CFR Part 389 

[Docket No. MARAD–2005–22050] 

RIN 2133–AB67 

Determination of Availability of 

Coastwise-Qualified Launch Barges 

AGENCY: Maritime Administration, 

Department of Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice of reopening and 

extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration 

is hereby giving notice that the closing 

date for filing comments on the 

Determination of Availability of 

Coastwise-Qualified Launch Barges 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 

(Docket No. MARAD 2005–22050) has 

been extended to the close of business 

(5 p.m. EST) on December 13, 2005. 

DATES: The comment date of the NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 15, 2005 (70 FR 47771) is 

extended from October 14, 2005, to 

December 13, 2005. 

(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66) 

Dated: October 12, 2005. 

By order of the Maritime Administrator. 

Joel C. Richard, 

Secretary, Maritime Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–20700 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–81–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 22, 24, and 27 

[WT Docket Nos. 03–264; FCC 05–144] 

Amendment of Various Rules Affecting 

Wireless Radio Services 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) requests comment on 

whether to implement a spectral density 

model to its radiated power rules for 

wireless radio services (WRS); further 

increase its radiated power limits; 

specify radiated power as an average 

rather than peak; and apply the radiated 

power rule changes to other services. In 

a related document, the Commission has 

streamlined and harmonized licensing 

provisions in the WRS that were 

identified in part during the 

Commission’s 2000 and 2002 biennial 

regulatory reviews. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

December 19, 2005, and submit reply 

comments on or before January 17, 

2006. For detailed instructions for 

submitting comments and additional 

information on the rulemaking process, 

see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wilbert E. Nixon, Jr. and/or B.C. ‘‘Jay’’

Jackson, Jr. of the Mobility Division, 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 

at 202–418–0620 or via e-mail at 

Wilbert.Nixon@fcc.gov and/or 

Jay.Jackson@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Further Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) portion 

of the Commission’s Report and Order 

and Further Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking, FCC 05–144, in WT Docket 

Nos. 03–264, adopted July 22, 2005, and 

released August 9, 2005. The 

Commission is also concurrently 

publishing a summary of the Report and 

Order in the Federal Register. The full 

text of the document is available for 

public inspection and copying during 

regular business hours at the FCC 

Reference Information Center, 445 12th 

St., SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, 

DC 20554. The complete text may be 

purchased from the Commission’s 

duplicating contractor: Best Copy & 

Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC, 

20554, telephone 800–378–3160, 

facsimile 202–488–5563, or via e-mail at 

fcc@bcpiweb.com. The full text may also 

be downloaded at: http://www.fcc.gov. 

Alternative formats are available to 

persons with disabilities by contacting 

Brian Millin at (202) 418–7426 or TTY 

(202) 418–7365 or at 

Brian.Millin@fcc.gov. 

Synopsis of the Further Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking 

I. Introduction and Background 

1. In the Report and Order portion of 

the Report and Order and Further 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we 

revise the broadband PCS transmitting 

power rule by eliminating the 

transmitter output power limit portion 

of that rule. We note, however, that 

various proposals before us concerning