alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted November 9,

ballot title certified December 3, 1999

#### Lloyd K. MARBET, *Petitioner, v.*Hardy MYERS, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, *Respondent, and*Andy REID and Daniel Meek, *Intervenors.*

(SC S46845)

991 P2d 1056

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner.

Holly A. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the answering memorandum were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Linda K. Williams, Portland, filed a response for intervenors.

PER CURIAM

*502PER CURIAM

This is a ballot title review proceeding brought under ORS 250.085(2). Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments concerning the content of the draft ballot title submitted to the Secretary of State and who therefore is entitled to seek review of the ballot title certified by the Attorney General. *See*ORS 250.085(2) (setting that requirement).

We have considered each of petitioner’s arguments concerning the ballot title certified by the Attorney General. We conclude that none establishes that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title fails substantially to comply with the standards for such ballot titles set out in ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d). Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title:

> AMENDS CONSTITUTION: INCREASES SIGNATURES REQUIRED TO PLACE INITIATIVE AMENDING CONSTITUTION ON BALLOT

> RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: “Yes” vote increases number of signatures required to place initiative to amend constitution on ballot.

> RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote rejects increasing signatures required to place initiative to amend constitution on ballot.

> SUMMARY: Amends constitution. Currently, initiative to amend Oregon Constitution can be placed on the ballot by a petition signed by a number of qualified voters equal to 8 percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates at last election for Governor. Measure increases number of signatures required to place initiative to amend constitution on ballot to 12 percent of total number of votes cast for all candidates at last election for Governor. Applies to initiative submitted for vote after November 2000 election.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(10).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. James D. Johnston at the Secretary of the                               ( print page 60496)                            Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC); 1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3d Fl.; Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002.                     

Bruno Leuyer, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-20778 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Exhibit 12.1
                                                                    ------------

AMM Holdings, Inc.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>     
Fixed Charge Calculation
Income before taxes and extraordinary item                    (17,261)
Fixed charges                                                  21,505
                                                              -------
                                                                4,244
Fixed charges                                                  21,505
                                                              -------
                                                                  0.2
                                                              =======
Fixed charges:
    Interest                                                   20,197
    Rent (1/3 of annual expense)                                1,308
                                                              -------
                                                               21,505
                                                              =======

Ratio of Earnings to Cash Interest Expense

Earnings                                                        4,244
Cash Interest Expense                                          20,197
                                                              -------
                                                                  0.2
                                                              =======
Net Debt to EBITDA

Debt                                                          294,187
EBITDA                                                         19,329
                                                              -------
                                                                 15.2
                                                              =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-79353 and No. 333-32700) pertaining to the 1996 Stock
Option Plan, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and the Foreign Subsidiary Employee Stock Purchase Plan of pcOrder.com, Inc.
of our report dated January 25, 2000, with respect to the financial statements
of pcOrder.com, Inc. included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas
March 28, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-841 (Review)]


Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines,\2\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on non-frozen concentrated apple juice from China would be likely 
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry 
in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff did not participate in this 
determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22694) 
and determined on August 5, 2005 that it would conduct an expedited 
review (70 FR 51365, August 30, 2005).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on September 28, 2005. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3799 (September 2005), 
entitled Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice from China: Investigation 
No. 731-TA-841 (Review).

    Issued: October 18, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-21109 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee H--Clinical Groups.
    Date: November 6-8, 2005.
    Time: 6:30 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockvlle Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Deborah R. Jaffe, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, National Cancer 
Institute, Division of Extramural Activities, 6116 Executive Blvd., 
Rm 8135, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7721, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#315b5057575455715c50585d1f5f58591f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="355f54535350517558545c591b5b5c5d1b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20753 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0001068237
<NAME>           Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                               2,000
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     2,000
<PP&E>                                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       2,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    0
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         2,000
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         0
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBITA-LRIPTermSheet2013-2015forCLC_finalFor10-QExhibit a


Exhibit A      


Motorola Solutions, Inc.
2013-2015 LRIP Terms
	
									
	Design Feature
	2013-2015 LRIP

	Performance Cycle
	Three years from 2013-2015

	Eligible Population
	CVP and above

	Performance Criteria
	Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
TSR Defined as:
Ending stock price
   (Daily average during the final three months of the Performance Cycle)
+   Value of reinvested dividends
=   Total ending value
–   Beginning stock price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
=   Total value created
÷   Beginning share price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
= Total shareholder return

	Negative TSR Component
	If the resulting TSR performance for Motorola Solutions is negative, the Committee will have negative discretion to reduce the final payout up to a 25% reduction of the calculated payout.

	Comparator Group
	Danaher Corp.
	JVC Kenwood Corp.

	Eaton Corp.
	NCR Corp.

	Emerson Electric Co.
	Parker-Hannifin Corp.

	Harris Corp.
	Raytheon Co.

	Honeywell International, Inc.
	Rockwell Collins, Inc.

	Ingersoll-Rand PLC
	TE Connectivity Ltd.

	Intermec, Inc.
	Tyco International Ltd.

	Payout Scale
	 

	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 

	1
	200%

	2
	185%

	3
	170%

	4
	155%

	5
	140%

	6
	125%

	7
	110%

	8
	100%

	9
	75%

	10
	50%

	11
	25%

	12
	0%

	13
	0%

	14
	0%

	15
	0%

	





	

A comparator company must be publicly traded on or after July 1, 2014, to be included in the TSR rank among other companies at the end of the performance cycle.





5
        


Exhibit A      


	
									
	

In the event a comparator company stops being publicly traded before July 1, 2014, the company will be excluded from the TSR rank at the end of the performance cycle and the payout scale will be adjusted as follows:



	Payout Scale With 13 Comparator Companies:
	Payout Scale With 12 Comparator Companies:

	 
	 

	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 
	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 

	1
	200%
	1
	200%

	2
	180%
	2
	180%

	3
	160%
	3
	160%

	4
	140%
	4
	140%

	5
	120%
	5
	120%

	6
	110%
	6
	110%

	7
	100%
	7
	100%

	8
	75%
	8
	65%

	9
	50%
	9
	25%

	10
	25%
	10
	0%

	11
	0%
	11
	0%

	12
	0%
	12
	0%

	13
	0%
	13
	0%

	14
	0%
	 

	 

	

Payout Scale With 11 Comparator Companies:
	

Payout Scale With 10 Comparator Companies:

	 
	 

	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 
	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 

	1
	200%
	1
	200%

	2
	180%
	2
	180%

	3
	160%
	3
	160%

	4
	140%
	4
	140%

	5
	120%
	5
	120%

	6
	100%
	6
	100%

	7
	65%
	7
	65%

	8
	25%
	8
	25%

	9
	0%
	9
	0%

	10
	0%
	10
	0%

	11
	0%
	11
	0%

	12
	0%
	 

	 





6
#### ROBERT LEE AYERS v. B. WALTON BROWN, Administrator of the Estate of ARCHIE MERRELL CREEF, JR., Deceased

No. 7419SC1089

(Filed 16 April 1975)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Seay, Judge.*Judgment entered 1 August 1974 in Superior Court, Randolph County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 14 March 1975.

This is one of four civil actions growing out of an automobile collision. All of the cases were consolidated for trial over plaintiff’s objection. The jury answered the issue of negligence in favor of plaintiff and the issue of - contributory negligence against him, and plaintiff appealed.

*Ottway Burton for plaintiff appellant.*

*Smith and Casper, by Archie L. Smith, for defendant a/p-pellee.*

MORRIS, Judge.

This case presents no question not answered by this Court in *Wood v. Brown, Administrator,*25 N.C. App. 241, 212 S.E. 2d 690 (1975). Decision there is controlling here, and no useful purpose would be served by discussing each assignment of error. On authority of *Wood v. Brown, supra,*all assignments of error are overruled.

No error.

Judges Britt and Arnold concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59099-59100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [To be published].

Status: Closed meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Announcement of Additional Meeting: Additional meeting.
    An additional Closed Meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, 
October 12, 2005 at 9 a.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the closed meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5

[[Page 59100]]

U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 
9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the 
closed meeting.
    Commissioner Nazareth, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be: Institution and 
settlement of an injunctive action.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 5, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20389 Filed 10-6-05; 11:37 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas GutierrezThomas GutierrezPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


May 12, 2006
Exhibit 13.2




















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rajiv Bansal, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F
of Infosys Limited for the year ended March 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Limited.



|                   | /s/ RAJIV BANSAL                                    
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                     
|Date: May 20, 2015 | Rajiv Bansal
        Chief Financial
        Officer
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.










*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*





*Mark
      L. Kay*


*Chief
      Executive Officer*




*August18,
      2006*