alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael
Jack Kugler, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of
U.S. Precious Metals, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.          This
Quarterly Report on 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                        | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|Date:
 February 17, 2009                | 
|                                        | 
|/s/ Michael
 Jack Kugler                | 
|                                        | 
|Michael Jack
 Kugler                    | 
|Chief
 Executive Officer                | 
|and Chairman
 of the Board of Directors | 
|(Principal
 Executive Officer)          | 



---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Presidential Documents 58289 

Executive Order 13386 of September 30, 2005 

Further Amendment to Executive Order 13369, Relating to 

the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, and to further extend the reporting 

deadline of the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, it is 

hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Section 5 of Executive Order 13369 of January 7, 2005, as amended 

by Executive Order 13379 of June 16, 2005, is further amended by deleting 

‘‘September 30, 2005’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘November 1, 2005’’. 

Sec. 2. Section 7 of Executive Order 13369 of January 7, 2005, is further 

amended by deleting ‘‘30 days after submitting its report pursuant to section 

5 of this order’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘November 15, 2005’’. 

Sec. 3. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against 

the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees 

or agents, or any other person. 

W 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 30, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–20156 

Filed 10–4–05; 9:57 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Douglas W. Fry, President of Autostrada Motors, Inc.(the "Registrant"), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"), and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; and 

 

c) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

| *Date:*** | *08/04/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Douglas W. Fry***                      |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Douglas W. Fry, President and Director*** |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kelvin WELLS.

No. 2003-CP-1265.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Wells, Kelvin;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Juvenile Court Div. B, No. 2-00-097; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 0390.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
14.1 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Supervisory Board
DaimlerChrysler AG We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement (No. 333-123535, which includes Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-13160) on
Form F-3 of DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corporation and the
registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-5074, 333-7082,
333-8998, 333-86934, 333-86936 and 333-134198) of DaimlerChrysler AG of
our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of DaimlerChrysler AG as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006, and the related managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 which reports appear in DaimlerChrysler AGs 2006 Annual
Report on Form 20-F. KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Stuttgart,
GermanyFebruary27,
2007
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SK Realty Ventures, Inc., (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Richard Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant





Dated:
              May 18, 2007
            
            /s/ Richard
              MillerRichard
                Miller,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
      deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
      Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
      after
      the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael WALKER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2078.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

Reconsideration Denied Oct. 10, 2003.

In re Walker, Michael;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 232,150; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 KW 0577.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoSensors, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted Wong, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





By: /s/
      Ted
      Wong


Ted
      Wong,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


July
      17,
      2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICEROFETS PAYPHONES, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, am the Chief Executive Officer of ETS Payphones,Inc. (the “Company”).

 

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, inconnection with the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

 

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

Dated: May 15, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ GUY A. LONGOBARDO   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Guy A. Longobardo       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to ETS Payphones, Inc. and will be retained by ETS Payphones,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20511 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL MCCANN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-610-12

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Attorney Daucie Elana Shefman, appointed to represent Paul McCann, Jr., on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McCann has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 02-20511 -2- responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL****OFFICER**


**NANOSENSORS,
      INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoSensors, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua Moser, Interim
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:




(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Company.





Date:
                July 15, 2008
            
            /s/
                Joshua MoserJoshua
                MoserInterim
                Chief Financial Officer





*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by
      Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
      the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION OF QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Balance at    Acquisitions    Charged       Charged                    Balance at
                                            beginning        and             to         to other                    end  of
                                            of period     dispositions   operations     accounts      Deductions     period
                                            ---------     ------------   ----------     --------      ---------    ----------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>           <C>             <C>          <C>          <C>
Year ended February 28, 1999
    Allowance for doubtful accounts        $   20,000     $     --     $    105,476     $     --     $ 125,476    $       --
                                           ==========     ========     ============     ========     =========    ==========

Year ended February 28, 1998
    Allowance for doubtful accounts        $       --     $     --     $     20,000     $     --     $      --    $   20,000
                                           ==========     ========     ============     ========     =========    ==========

Year ended February 28, 1997
    Allowance for doubtful accounts        $       --     $     --     $         --     $     --     $      --    $       --
                                           ==========     ========     ============     ========     =========    ==========
</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3458

___________

Abidan Chavez Tevalan, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Immigration

* and Naturalization Service.

John Ashcroft, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: September 24, 2003

 Filed: September 30, 2003

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Abidan C. Tevalan, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s

(IJ’s) denial of Tevalan’s application for asylum and withholding of removal.

Respondent has moved to dismiss Tevalan’s appeal from the denial of his asylum

application, arguing this court lacks jurisdiction to review that matter because the

application was dismissed as untimely filed. After careful review of the record, we

grant respondent’s motion to dismiss that portion of the petition relating to asylum,

and we deny the remainder of the petition.
-2-

Specifically, we lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Tevalan

did not show changed or extraordinary circumstances justifying his untimely asylum

application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (no court shall have jurisdiction to review

Attorney General’s determination as to timeliness of asylum application). As to the

denial of withholding of removal, we conclude that the BIA’s ruling should be

affirmed because Tevalan did not show a clear probability that he will face

persecution on account of his political opinion upon return to Guatemala. See

Kratchmarov v. Heston, 172 F.3d 551, 553-55 (8th Cir. 1999). 

Accordingly, we grant respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as it relates

to asylum, and we deny the petition as it relates to withholding of removal. 

______________________________
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TORI LYNN CORDOVA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

) C.A. No. N22C

- 04

- 086 MMJ

)

JOEL MAEGO KIAGE and EMMA )

LOGISTICS, LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Submitted: January 12, 2024

Decided: January 22 , 2024

On Prime I nsurance Company’s Application for

Certification of Interlocutory Appeal

DENIED

1. On December 18, 2023, the Court denied Prime Insurance Company’s Motion

to Intervene.

2. On January 2, 2024, Prime filed an Application for Certification of

Interlocutory Appeal.

3. Supreme Court Rule 42(c)(i) provides that an application for certification of

interlocutory appeal “shall be served and filed within 10 days of the entry of the

order from which th e appeal is sought, or such longer time as the trial court, in its

discretion, may order for good cause shown.”4. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Application for Certification of Interlocutory

Appeal of Prime Insurance Company was filed on January 12, 2024.

5. Ru le 42(a) provides: “ All time periods under this rule should be calculated

under Supreme Court Rule 11.”

6. Supreme Court Rule 11 states: “When the period of time prescribed or allowed

is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and other legal holida ys shall

be excluded in the computation.” The relevant period of time for filing an

application is 10 days. Therefore, exclusion of intermediate days does not apply.

7. Strict compliance with Rule 4 2 is required by the Supreme Court. Julian v.

State

, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).

8. Prime’s Application was filed 15 days after this Court’s December 18, 2023

ruling.

THEREFORE , the Court finds that Prime Insurance Company’s Application for

Certification of Interlocutory Appeal is hereby DENIED AS UNTIMELY. T he

Court further finds that Prime has failed to demonstrate good cause for its untimely

filing.

SO ORDERED



## Mary M. Johnston

Judge Mary M. Johnston
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERT RAMIREZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 1

- 00 2 98

- C R

Appeal from the

171 st District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20090D03210 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to supplement the record with the

reporter’s record with hearings conducted on April 8, 2011. The motion is GRANTED. Further,

the Court orders the court reporter to prepare and file the supplemental reporter ’s record no later

than June 27, 2014

. Appellant’s brief is currently on its second final extension and is due to be

filed on June 10, 2014. Given that the record is incomplete, the Court has determined that

Appellant’s brief shall be due 30 days after the date the supplemental reporter’s record is

filed. The Court discourages the filing of any extension requests to file the supplemental record

or the Appellant’s brief absent extraordinary circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of May , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.