alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                         CERTIFICATE OF PERIODIC REPORT

          I, Peter Chambre, Chief Executive Officer of Cambridge Antibody
Technology Group plc (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.   the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the financial year
          ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: December 19, 2002
                                         /s/ Peter Chambre
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Peter Chambre
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4950 

To provide for improvements to the administration of bankruptcy in cases 

under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. WHITFIELD, and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for improvements to the administration of bankruptcy in cases under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United 

States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chapter 7 Bankruptcy 

5 Administration Improvement Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEES. 

7 (a) NEW ASSET ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 326(a) of 

8 title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(a) 

9 In a case under chapter 7 or 11’’ and inserting the fol10 lowing: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4950 IH

1 ‘‘(a)(1) In a case under chapter 7, the court may 

2 allow reasonable compensation under section 330 of this 

3 title of the trustee for the trustee’s services, payable after 

4 the trustee renders such services, not to exceed 25 percent 

5 on the first $50,000 or less, 15 percent on any amount 

6 in excess of $50,000 but not in excess of $250,000, 5 per7 cent on any amount in excess of $250,000 but not in ex8 cess of $1,000,000, and 3 percent on any amount in excess 

9 of $1,000,000, upon all moneys disbursed or turned over 

10 in the case by the trustee to parties in interest, excluding 

11 the debtor, but including holders of secured claims. 

12 ‘‘(2) In a case under chapter 11’’. 

13 (b) COMPENSATION.—Section 330(a)(7) of title 11, 

14 the United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

15 ‘‘(7) In determining the amount of reasonable com16 pensation to be awarded to a trustee under chapter 7, the 

17 court shall treat such compensation as a commission, 

18 based on section 326(a)(1).’’. 

19 SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

20 The amendments made by this Act shall not apply 

21 with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 

22 United States Code before the date of the enactment of 

23 this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 10.10
 NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2004 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 THIS DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT Award Agreement  Award Date Corporation  Director
 W I T N E S S E T H
 WHEREAS Plan Award
 NOW THEREFORE
 1. Defined Terms
 2. Grant Restricted Stock
 3. Vesting
 4. Continuance of Services
 5. Dividend and Voting Rights




---



##### 



6. Restrictions on Transfer
 7. Stock Issuance
 Book Entry Form
 Certificates to be Held by Corporation; Legend
 The ownership of this certificate and the shares of stock evidenced hereby and any
interest therein are subject to substantial restrictions on transfer under an
Agreement entered into between the registered owner and New Century Financial
Corporation. A copy of such Agreement is on file in the office of the Secretary of
New Century Financial Corporation.
 Delivery of Certificates Upon Vesting
 Stock Power; Power of Attorney




---



##### 



8. Effect of Termination of Directors Services .
 General
 Death, Disability or Retirement Disability Retirement
 Severance Date
 9. Adjustments Upon Specified Events




---



##### 



Restricted Property
 10. Tax Withholding
 11. Notices
 12. Plan




---



##### 



after
 13. Entire Agreement
 14. Counterparts
 15. Section Headings
 16. Governing Law
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL
    
    
    
    DIRECTORCORPORATION, a Maryland corporationBy:Name:
    
    Brad MorriceTitle:
    
    Vice Chairman, President andChief Operating Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                      
|                   |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  | (Chief Accounting Officer)            

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61461-61462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group Biomedical Research and Research 
Training Review Subcommittee A
    Date: November 8, 2005.

[[Page 61462]]

    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Clarion Hotel Bethesda Park, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2848, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1bdb0a5bab4a3b291bfb8b6bca2ffbfb8b9ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="402c21342b253223002e29272d336e2e29286e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 13, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21125 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO(1)**

 

Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Favrille, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), to which this Certification is attached to as Exhibit 32.1,I, John P. Longenecker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Favrille, Inc.,certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.    The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Favrille, Inc. for the period covered by theReport.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Favrille, Inc.and will be retained by Favrille, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date   | August 14, 2006 |   | By                                    | /s/ John P. Longenecker |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                 |   | John P. Longenecker, Ph.D.,           |
|   |                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----

(1) Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Favrille, Inc. under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5007 

To authorize the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 

make grants to assist small business concerns located in areas affected 

by a major disaster and high unemployment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2010 

Mr. LANGEVIN (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To authorize the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to make grants to assist small business concerns located in areas affected by a major disaster and 

high unemployment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Dis5 aster Assistance Grant Program Act of 2010’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5007 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM. 

2 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Administrator of the Small 

3 Business Administration is authorized to make grants to 

4 assist covered small businesses. 

5 (b) MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT.—A grant made 

6 under subsection (a) shall be in an amount not exceeding 

7 $25,000. 

8 (c) TERMINATION.—The Administrator is authorized 

9 to make grants under subsection (a) during the 2-year pe10 riod beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. 

11 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

12 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

13 such sums as may be necessary. 

14 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi15 nitions apply: 

16 (1) COVERED SMALL BUSINESS.—The term 

17 ‘‘covered small business’’ means a small business 

18 concern located, on the date a grant is made to such 

19 concern under subsection (a)— 

20 (A) in a State with an unemployment rate 

21 that exceeds the unemployment rates of at least 

22 75 percent of all other States, as determined by 

23 the Administrator; and 

24 (B) in an area for which the President has 

25 declared, during the 2-year period preceding 

26 such date, a major disaster under section 401 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5007 IH

1 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

2 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170). 

3 (2) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.—The term 

4 ‘‘small business concern’’ has the meaning given 

5 such term under section 3(a) of the Small Business 

6 Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)). 

7 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means any of 

8 the 50 States and the District of Columbia. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 62 8 . DENNI S SANDERS v . THE STATE.

Den n i s San ders p l ed gu i l t y t o ag g rav at ed b at t ery

, cru el t y t o ch il d ren i n t h e fi rs t

d eg ree, an d b at t ery

, an d t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered h is ju d g m en t o f co n v ict i o n o n J u l y 1 1,

2 0 1 2

. San d ers fi l ed a p ro s e n ot i ce o f ap p eal o n Au g u s t 15

, 2 0 1 2. W e l ack

ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

T o b e t i m e l y, a n o t i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t r y o f t h e

o rd er o n ap p eal

. See O C G A § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e pro p er an d t i m el y fi l i ng o f a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i s an ab s o l u t e req ui rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d ict i on o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v.

S t a t e

, 2 6 4 Ga. 8 72

, 87 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Becau s e San d ers fi l ed h i s n o t i ce

o f ap peal 3 5 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o r d e r h e s eek s t o ap p eal

, i t i s un t i m el y

.

Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i on

.

W e no t e, h o wev e r

, t h a t S a n d e r s w a s r e p r e s e n t e d b y co un s el b efo re t h e t ri al

co u rt an d m ay b e en ti t led t o p u rs u e an ou t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. H e i s t herefo re i n fo rm ed

o f t h e fo l lo wi n g i n acco rd an ce wi t h Ro wl a n d v. S t a te

, s u p ra at 8 7 5-8 7 6 : Th i s ap p eal

h as b een d i s m i s s ed b ecau s e y o u fai l ed t o fi le a ti m el y no t ice o f a p p e a l

. If y o u s t i l l

wi s h t o ap p eal

, y o u m ay p et i t i o n t h e t ri al co u rt fo r l eav e t o fi l e an o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

.

If th e t ri al co u rt g ran t s y o u r r e q u es t, y o u wi l l h av e 30 d ay s fro m t he en t ry o f t h at

o rd er t o fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap p eal referen ci n g y o u r co n v i ct i o n

. If t h e t ri al co u rt d en i es

y o u r req u es t

, y o u wi l l h av e 3 0 d ay s fro m th e en t ry o f t h a t o rd er to fi l e a no t i ce o f

ap p eal referen ci ng t h e d en i al o f y o u r req u es t fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

.

Th e Cl erk of Co u rt is d i rect ed t o s en d a co p y o f t hi s o rd er t o San d ers an d to

San ders ’ s at t orn ey , an d t h e l at t er i s al s o d irect ed t o s en d a co p y t o San ders

. January 20, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/20/2016
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hill International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, John Fanelli III, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 13, 2007
#### Charles ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. B. CAMPBELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-3537

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 13, 1972.

Charles Allen pro. se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, David L. G. King, Jr., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

*

  Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal the petitioner contends for the first time that his 1965 convictions for robbery and burglary were the product of an involuntary plea of guilty. His failure to exhaust available State remedies with respect to that issue precludes its consideration here. Picard v. Connor, 1971, 404 U.S. 270, 92 S.Ct. 509, 30 L.Ed.2d 438.

Under these circumstances, given the presumptive validity of the guilty plea, we affirm the District Court’s holding that by entering such a plea the petitioner waived all previous nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings, including those involving the racial composition of the grand jury that indicted him. Colson v. Smith, 5 Cir., 1971, 438 F.2d 1075.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPILHOLDING (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Louis Bertoli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Louis Bertoli*     |
|-------------------------|
| Louis Bertoli           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| November 19, 2013       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42837

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WILLIAM V. WOODS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 723

Filed: November 19, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Boundary County. Hon. Barbara A. Buchanan, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

William V. Woods pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine and possession of 

heroin. Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(1). Following his plea, Woods was sentenced to consecutive 

unified sentences of five years with one and one-half years determinate and the district court 

retained jurisdiction.

Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction. 

Woods filed a Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentences, which the district court granted by 

ordering that Woods’ sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively. Woods appeals, 

claiming that the district court abused its discretion by relinquishing jurisdiction. Woods 
2

received his requested relief in the Rule 35 motion and makes no claim for further reduction of 

his sentences.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Woods

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

The order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.