alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph L. Billhimer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Premier EntertainmentBiloxi LLC;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e» for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2004

 

 
|  /s/  Joseph  L. Billhimer |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Joseph  L. Billhimer                      |   |   |
| Chief  Operating Officer                  |   |   |

 

1

----
12312001 Form 10-K Exhbit 10.160





                                            Exhibit 10.160



AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

to the

Custodial Agreement

dated as of June 21, 2000

By and Among

E-LOAN, INC.,

BANKERS TRUST COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.

and

GREENWICH CAPITAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC.

This AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (this "Amendment") is made this 21st day of
March, 2002, among E-LOAN, INC. (the "Borrower"), Bankers Trust Company
of California, N.A. (the "Custodian") and Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc. (the "tender") to the CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT, dated as of
June 21, 2000 (the "Custodial Agreement").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that Lender and the Custodian agree
to amend the Custodial Agreement, subject to the terms hereof, and the Lender
and the Custodian have agreed to such request.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

SECTION 1.  Effective as of March 21, 2002, the first paragraph in the
"Recitals" section of the Custodial Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the
date "June 21, 2000" and replacing it with "March 21, 2002".

SECTION 2.  Defined Terms.  Any terms capitalized but not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Custodial
Agreement.

SECTION 3.  Limited Effect.  Except as expressly amended and modified
by this Amendment Number One, the Custodial Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.  Reference to this Amendment
Number One need not be made in the Custodial Agreement or any other instrument
or document executed in connection therewith, or in any certificate, letter or
communication issued or made pursuant to, or with respect to, the Custodial
Agreement, any reference in any of such items to the Custodial Agreement being
sufficient to refer to the Custodial Agreement as amended hereby.

SECTION 4.  GOVERNING LAW.  THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE SHALL BE
CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (INCLUDING
SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW) AND THE OBLIGATIONS,
RIGHTS, AND REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SUCH LAWS WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAWS DOCTRINE APPLIED IN SUCH STATE
(OTHER THAN SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW).

SECTION 5.  Counterparts.  This Amendment Number One may be executed
by each of the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts, each of
which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same instrument.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrowers, Lender and Custodian have caused this
amendment to be executed and delivered by their duly authorized officers as of
the day and year first above written.
E-LOAN, INC.,

Borrower
By:

Name:  

Title:  


GREENWICH CAPITAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC.,

Lender
By:

Name:  

Title:  


BANKERS TRUST COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.,

Custodian
By:

Name:  

Title:
#### W. O. Brooks, *Appellant,*v. Iva T. Sprinkle, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 8, 1928.

*Joe Hill Williams,*for Appellant;

*J. L. Frazee,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of' the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

' Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-85978 and 333-120775 on Form S-3 and 333-122855 on Form S-4of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and the relatedfinancial statement schedules appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2004. Such report, which is dated February 28, 2005, expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—an interpretation of ARB No. 51,” and the change in method of accounting for subscriber acquisition, upgrade and retention costs. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 4, 2005
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 17, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1899

Lower Tribunal No. 99-5569 (A)

________________



### Valation Curtis Ellis

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas Rebull

, Judge.

Valation Curtis Ellis

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, J.

This is an appeal from an order summarily denying a motion filed pursuantto Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which, however, should be treated as

filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must

reverse unless the postconviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is

entitled to no relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we

reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters

an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach

record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4996 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4996

    To provide for congressional approval of national monuments and 
             restrictions on the use of national monuments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2010

   Ms. Foxx (for herself, Mr. McClintock, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. 
  Lamborn, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Bishop of 
  Utah, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. 
  Flake, Mrs. Lummis, and Mr. Duncan) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for congressional approval of national monuments and 
             restrictions on the use of national monuments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserve Land Freedom For Americans 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS.

    The Act of June 8, 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 2 (16 U.S.C. 431), by striking ``sec. 2. 
        That the'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS.

    ``After obtaining congressional approval of the proposed national 
monument and certifying compliance with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) with respect to the 
proposed national monument, the''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 5. RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC USE.

    ``The Secretary of the Interior shall not implement any 
restrictions on the public use of a national monument until the 
expiration of an appropriate review period (as determined by the 
Secretary of the Interior) providing for public input and congressional 
approval.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph PARISI, Appellant, v. Major General Phillip B. DAVIDSON et al., Appellees.

No. 25773.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 6, 1972.

Richard L. Goff (argued), Douglas M. Schwab, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Steven Kazan, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appel-lees.

Before HAMLEY, ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

PER CURIAM.

This court’s judgment in the subject cause, reported at 435 F.2d 299 (9th Cir. 1970), and affirming the judgment of the District Court, has now been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34, 92 S.Ct. 815, 31 L.Ed.2d 17 (1972).

Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s mandate, filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on March 24, 1972, the judgment of the District Court is now reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

So ordered.
#### James RENNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 81391.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 22, 2003.

*852Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H CRANDALL JR., J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

James T. Renner (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits after evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims his guilty plea was involuntarily entered due to ineffective assistance of his counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4843 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4843

 To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Defense to cover a larger share of expenses under the National Guard 
Youth Challenge Program in the case of a State program during its first 
                       three years of operation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2010

  Mr. Minnick (for himself and Mr. Simpson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Defense to cover a larger share of expenses under the National Guard 
Youth Challenge Program in the case of a State program during its first 
                       three years of operation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Youth Challenge 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SHARE OF EXPENSES FOR NEW 
              STATE PROGRAMS UNDER NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Increased Share Authorized.--Section 509(d) of title 32, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), for the first three fiscal 
years during which a State program of the Program is in operation, the 
amount of assistance provided by the Secretary of Defense to the State 
program may not exceed 100 percent of the costs of operating the State 
program.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067457
<NAME> ROMACORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                             39
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,103
<PP&E>                                         60,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,331
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,711
<SALES>                                       109,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              119,097
<CGS>                                          35,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 108,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,741)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (179)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   592
<CHANGES>                                        (513)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (254)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          61,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          60,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 795,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        164,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                     392,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   795,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               686,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  620,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,298
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46









</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*





*Mark
      L. Kay*


*Chief
      Executive Officer*




*May21,
      2007*