alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4792 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Minerals Management Service, to conduct a technological capability assessment, survey, 

and economic feasibility study regarding recovery of minerals, other than 

oil and natural gas, from the shallow and deep seabed of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 

Minerals Management Service, to conduct a technological 

capability assessment, survey, and economic feasibility 

study regarding recovery of minerals, other than oil and 

natural gas, from the shallow and deep seabed of the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, SURVEY, AND 

4 STUDY OF DEEP SEABED MINERALS. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

6 acting through the Minerals Management Service and in 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4792 IH

1 consultation with the heads of other appropriate Federal 

2 agencies, shall conduct— 

3 (1) an assessment of all available domestic tech4 nological capabilities required for the location and 

5 the efficient and environmentally sound recovery of 

6 minerals, other than oil and natural gas, from the 

7 shallow and deep seabed of the United States; 

8 (2) a survey of the shallow and deep seabed of 

9 the United States to identify sites for the recovery 

10 of such minerals; and 

11 (3) an economic feasibility study on the recov12 ery of such minerals. 

13 (b) REPORT.—No later than 2 years after the date 

14 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a re15 port to Congress containing the findings and recommenda16 tions of the assessment, survey, and study under this sec17 tion. 

18 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘shallow 

19 and deep seabed of the United States’’— 

20 (1) means areas of the seabed that are contig21 uous to and within 200 miles of the territorial sea 

22 of the United States and the resources of which are 

23 subject to its jurisdiction or control; and 

24 (2) includes such areas that are contiguous to 

25 and within 200 miles of the territorial sea around 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4792 IH

1 any inhabited and uninhabited territory or posses2 sion of the United States including American 

3 Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

4 Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, 

5 Midway Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, 

6 Palau, Marshall Islands, Midway Islands, Wake Is7 land, Johnston Atoll, Baker, Howland, and Jarvis 

8 Islands, Kingman Reef, Navassa Island, Serranilla 

9 Bank, Bajo Nuevo Bank, and Palmyra Atoll. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
WILLIAM C. DICKS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5800

Opinion filed May 7, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

William C. Dicks, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the October 28, 2014, order denying 

motion for postconviction relief in Columbia County Circuit Court case number 2010-

CF-000234. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be 

provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. 

App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

WOLF, THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Cary, Bangs *&*Woodward, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*J. L. Edmondson, defendant in error.

(By two judges.) — Non-residents of this State are not required, by our law, to pay taxes on notes held by them on citizens of this State, and when the payee of a note is the plaintiff in a suit on a note dated before June, 1865, and it appear that, at the date of the note, and continuously since, he has not resided here, and that he has been the owner of the note from its date, he is not required to make the affidavit of taxes being paid as required by the Act of October 13th, 1870. 27th February, 1872.

Taxes. Relief Act of 1870. Before Judge Harrell. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

Cary, Bangs *&*Woodward sued Edmondson upon his promissory notes dated in 1860, and purporting to have been made in Baltimore. He filed several pleas, one of which was that he ought to pay no interest because “said notes were held during the war by the parties who resided in the city of Baltimore and could not be paid.” Because no affidavit of the payment of taxes had been filed under the Relief Act of 1870, the Court dismissed the cause, although their “ attorney stated and offered to prove that they were non-residents.” This is assigned as error.

R. E. Simmons, by Z. D. Harrison, for plaintiffs in error.

Wooten *&*Hoyle, for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

This case turns upon the non-residence of the plaintiff. We have decided in several cases that notes held by nonresidents of this State, not used here, but only here for collection, are not taxable by our laws. The proof here is that at the making of the note, and continuously since, the plaintiff, to whom the note is payable, has not resided in this State. This the judgment, under these rulings, made, doubtless, since this decision by Judge Harrell, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.
#### Jeff MARLER and Jodi Marler, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY d/b/a Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 81037.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

April 15, 2003.

Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 3, 2003.

Josh P. Tolin, Tolin Law Office LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Appellants.

Robert Solomon Rosenthal, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondents.

Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Jeff Marler and Jodi Marler (collectively Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s Summary Judgment in favor of Saint Louis University d/b/a Saint Louis University School of Medicine (Respondent). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude, as the trial court did, that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *ITT Commercial Fin. v. Mid-Am. Marine,*854 *182S.W.2d 871, 381 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
MIDLAND
                               LOAN SERVICES, INC.

    Report of Management Compliance with the Minimum Servicing Standards Set
      Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers



We, as members of  management of Midland Loan  Services,  Inc.  (MLS),  a wholly
owned subsidiary of PNC Bank Corp.  (PNCBC),  are responsible for complying with
the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage  Bankers (USAP)
except  for  commercial  loan  and  multifamily  servicing,   minimum  servicing
standards V.4 and VI.1,  which the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America has
interpreted as  inapplicable  to such  servicing.  We are also  responsible  for
establishing  and maintaining  effective  internal  control over compliance with
these  standards.  We have performed an evaluation of MLS'  compliance  with the
minimum servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1998 and
for the year then  ended.  Based on this  evaluation,  we assert that during the
year ended December 31, 1998, MLS complied,  in all material respects,  with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP except as described below.

With  regard to  Standard  I.4,  reconciling  items  exist  which  have not been
resolved within ninety calendar days of their original identification.

As of and for this  same  period,  PNCBC had in  effect a  fidelity  bond in the
amount of  $300,000,000  and an error  and  omissions  policy  in the  amount of
$20,000,000.


                                  /s/ Leon E. Bergman
                                 _________________________________________
                                 Leon E. Bergman
                                 Executive Vice President


                                  /s/ Paula J. Mickelson
                                 _________________________________________
                                 Paula J. Mickelson
                                 Vice President


March 30, 1999
Opinion issued February 20, 2014 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 13
- 00199
- CV

——————————— PACCAR, INC., CL EVELAND MACK SALES, INC. D/B/A PERFORMANCE KENWORTH , INC. , AND CATERPILLAR, INC. Appellant s V. HO HO HO EXPRESS, IN C. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2008
- 24797

MEMORANDUM OPINION
A ppellants, Cleveland Mack Sales, Inc. d/b/a Performance Kenworth Inc. and Caterpillar, Inc., have settled their disputes with appellee Ho Ho H o Express, Inc. and move to dismiss their appeal and vacate the trial court’s judgment

. In2 addition, appellee Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc. and appellant PACCAR, Inc. have settled their dispute and jointly move to dismiss PACCAR, Inc.’s appeal . We grant both motions. All disputes in this case having been settled, at the parties’ request, we vacate the trial court’s judgmen t and dismiss the case.

Jane Bland Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2002



Eckhardt Trading Company
53 West Jackson Boulevard
Suite 1240
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Attention:  Ms. Audrey L. Gale

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal

Dear Ms. Gale:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made below (the "Management Agreement"). We
are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2003 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

     o  Salomon  Smith  Barney  Global  Diversified  Futures  Fund  L.P.

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:        /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
           ----------------------------
           Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED
ECKHARDT TRADING COMPANY


By:       /s/ Audrey L. Gale
        ----------------------------

Print Name:  Audrey L. Gale
        ----------------------------
          Chief Financial Officer
DRMcA/sr
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                      2002 PERFORMANCE PROFIT SHARING PLAN



All employees of the Company are eligible to receive cash profit sharing based
on the 2002 year-end results of the RTW, Inc. and its Subsidiary. The annual
profit sharing plan is based on exceeding the Company's pre-tax, pre-profit
sharing profit plan for 2002. Forty percent (40%) of any excess profit over the
plan, up to a maximum level, will be shared with all employees. The profit
sharing will be distributed as a percentage (%) of salary to all employees. Cash
profit sharing payments are made annually after completion of the year-end
audit.

Executive officers and management personnel, additionally, earn stock options
based upon exceeding the company's pre-tax, pre-profit sharing profit plan for
2002. Executives and management personnel are eligible for a fixed number of
options, pro-rated on a sliding scale, in excess of the profit plan, up to a
maximum level. Stock option grants will be made annually after completion of the
year-end audit.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4882 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study to determine the 

feasibility of carrying out a project to address the water resource development and management needs of the Soboba Band of Luisen ̃o Indians 

Reservation, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2010 

Mr. BACA (for himself, Mrs. BONO MACK, and Mr. LEWIS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study 

to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project 

to address the water resource development and management needs of the Soboba Band of Luisen ̃o Indians 

Reservation, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOBOBA BAND OF LUISEN ̃ O INDIANS RESERVA4 TION, CALIFORNIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

6 conduct, at Federal expense, a study to determine the fea7 sibility of carrying out a project to address the water reVerDate Nov 24 2008 21:24 Mar 19, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4882.IH H4882

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4882 IH

1 source development and management needs of the Soboba 

2 Band of Luisen ̃o Indians Reservation, California. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

5 $1,700,000. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly
130150(85) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

GEORGE H. GOLDSTONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 130150

v COA: 262831 Oakland CC: 04-060611-CZ BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ _____________

On order of the Chief Justice, the mo tion by plaintiff-appella nt that judicial notice be taken of a resolution by the State Board of Education is considered and it is DENIED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2007

Clerk
Christopher CHAMBERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation d/b/a Moses Cone Health System and d/b/a Cone Health; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

No. 147PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Barry L. Kramer, Attorney at Law, for Chambers, Christopher.

Philip J. Mohr, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Brent Fancher Powell, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Carol L. Brooke, Attorney at Law, Jack Holtzman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Clermont F. Ripley, Attorney at Law, William R. Corbett, Attorney at Law, Deborah Goldstein, Attorney at Law, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of June 2018 by Plaintiff to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

I, Robert H. Lorsch, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MMR Information Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (ii) the information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MMR
Information Systems, Inc.

|/s/ Robert H. Lorsch
|--------------------
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that section.
This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
        connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Mark Joseph Corrao, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
        of
        the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:





(1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
      Mark Joseph Corrao*





*Mark
      Joseph Corrao*


*Chief
      Financial Officer*




*December
      4, 2006*
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syntony Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Michael Vardakis, President and Treasurer and Matthew C. Lords,
Vice President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 11/14/2005                         /s/Michael Vardakis
     -----------                         ---------------------
                                         Michael Vardakis
                                         President, Treasurer and director


Date: 11/14/2005                         /s/Matthew C. Lords
     -----------                         ---------------------
                                         Matthew C. Lords
                                         Vice President, Secretary and
                                         director
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4947 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the per-fiscal year 

calculation of days of certain active duty or active service used to reduce 

the minimum age at which a member of a reserve component of the 

uniformed services may retire for non-regular service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mr. LATHAM (for himself and Mr. BOREN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the 

per-fiscal year calculation of days of certain active duty 

or active service used to reduce the minimum age at 

which a member of a reserve component of the uniformed 

services may retire for non-regular service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reserve Retirement 

5 Deployment Credit Correction Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4947 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PER-FISCAL YEAR CALCULATION 

2 OF DAYS OF CERTAIN ACTIVE DUTY OR AC3 TIVE SERVICE TO REDUCE ELIGIBILITY AGE 

4 FOR RETIREMENT FOR NON-REGULAR SERV5 ICE. 

6 (a) EFFECT OF 90-DAY PERIODS OF SERVICE.—Sec7 tion 12731(f)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘below 60 years of age by three 

9 months for each aggregate of 90 days on which such per10 son so performs in any fiscal year after such date, subject 

11 to subparagraph (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘, subject to subpara12 graph (C), below 60 years of age by three months for each 

13 aggregate of 90 days on which such person serves on such 

14 active duty or performs such active service after such 

15 date’’. 

16 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amend17 ment made by subsection (a) shall take effect as of Janu18 ary 28, 2008, and as if included in the National Defense 

19 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 

20 181) as enacted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS