alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2



CONSENT OF BRUCE E. WALDMAN



I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-122329), Form S-3 (File No. 333-109607) and Form S-3
(File No. 333-40936) of Private Media Group, Inc. of my report dated March 21, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of Private North America Ltd. at December 31, 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, which report
is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.



Sherman Oaks, California



March 30, 2005



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Bruce E. Waldman, C.P.A.
|Bruce E. Waldman, C.P.A.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 16


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549


We were previously principal accountants for X-Ramp.com, Inc. (formerly
Classified OnLine.Com) and, under date of April 6, 2000, we reported on the
consolidated financial statements of Classified OnLine.com and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1999 and for the period from February 9, 1999 (inception)
through December 31, 1999. On March 21, 2001, our appointment as principal
accountants was terminated. We have read X-Ramp.com, Inc.'s statements included
under Item 4 of its Form 8-K/A dated April 9, 2001, and we agree with such
statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with
X-Ramp.com, Inc.'s statements regarding the engagement of new principal
accountants or that the change was recommended and approved by the Company's
board of directors.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Morgan, Jacoby, Thurn, Boyle & Associates, P.A.


April 9, 2001
Vero Beach, Florida
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RADIO UNICA CORP. FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      38,894,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,232,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,738,547
<PP&E>                                      11,769,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,505,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,871,411
<BONDS>                                    105,029,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 38,266,437
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (26,303,394)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,505,573
<SALES>                                      8,218,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,218,043
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,196,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (6,038,483)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (24,283,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,446,745 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (21,836,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (21,836,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (2,438.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2,438.47)
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JORGE A. GONZALEZ
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2921

[ December 21, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Charles E. Burton , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CF000276A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm Beach, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4470 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of the 

Treasury to regulate tax return preparers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to direct the 

Secretary of the Treasury to regulate tax return preparers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Return Preparer 

5 Accountability Act of 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4470 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF TAX RETURN PREPARERS WHO 

2 ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVES PRACTICING 

3 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREAS4 URY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 3 of title 

6 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting after sec7 tion 330 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 330A. Tax return preparers who are not represent9 atives practicing before the Department 

10 of the Treasury 

11 ‘‘(a) The Secretary of the Treasury shall, under regu12 lations prescribed by the Secretary, regulate any tax re13 turn preparers who are not regulated by the Secretary 

14 under section 330. 

15 ‘‘(b)(1) The Secretary may impose a penalty of 

16 $1,000 for each Federal tax return, document, or other 

17 submission prepared by a tax return preparer during a 

18 period in which the tax return preparer— 

19 ‘‘(A) is not in compliance with the regulations 

20 promulgated under this section, or 

21 ‘‘(B) is suspended or disbarred from acting as 

22 a tax return preparer under such regulations. 

23 Any penalty imposed under the preceding sentence shall 

24 be in addition to any other penalty which may be imposed. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4470 IH

1 ‘‘(2) No penalty may be imposed under paragraph (1) 

2 with respect to any failure if it is shown that such failure 

3 is due to reasonable cause. 

4 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this section: 

5 ‘‘(1) The term ‘tax return preparer’ has the 

6 meaning given by section 7701(a)(36) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986. 

8 ‘‘(2) The terms ‘Secretary of the Treasury’ and 

9 ‘Secretary’ mean the Secretary of the Treasury or 

10 the delegate of the Secretary.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 for subchapter II of chapter 3 of title 31, United States 

13 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

14 section 330 the following new item: 

‘‘330A. Tax return preparers who are not representatives practicing before the 

Department of the Treasury.’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply with respect to returns prepared 

17 for taxable years ending after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Libra Global Technology Services (UK) Limited et al., Appellants, v Telemedia International, Ltd., Respondent.

*[719*NYS2d 53]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County *327(Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 29, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s cross motion to confirm the Referee’s report dated September 14, 1999, which found that plaintiffs did not prove that New York had personal jurisdiction over the defendant, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to reject the Referee’s report, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly found that personal jurisdiction over defendant Telemedia International had not been obtained under CPLR 301, since Telemedia-USA, the New York premises of which were used in connection with the negotiation of the contract sued upon, although a wholly owned subsidiary of Telemedia International, was not a “mere department” thereof *(see, Delagi v Volkswagenwerk AG,*29 NY2d 426, 432; *Taca Intl. Airlines v Rolls-Royce of England,*15 NY2d 97, 102). Nor was Telemedia-USA acting as Telemedia International’s agent in the State of New York for jurisdictional purposes *(cf., Frummer v Hilton Hotels Inti.,*19 NY2d 533, *cert denied*389 US 923).

Plaintiffs also failed to establish jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302 (a) (1), New York’s long-arm statute, since Telemedia International did not “project” itself into New York for jurisdictional purposes via the 45-minute video-conference, during which the parties negotiated a portion of their contract for the provision of worldwide telecommunications services *(see, Worldwide Futgol Assocs. v Event Entertainment,*983 F Supp 173, 177). Further, where, as here, a defendant has signed a contract outside of this State, a court cannot exercise jurisdiction over that defendant pursuant to CPLR 302 (a) (1) based simply on the circumstance that the plaintiff signed in New York *(see, Standard Wine & Liq. Co. v Bombay Spirits Co.,*20 NY2d 13, 17; *Millner Co. v Noudar, Lda.,*24 AD2d 326, 329-330). Finally, jurisdiction under the second prong of CPLR 302 (a) (1) cannot be based upon the existence of secondary contracts potentially involving defendant’s provision of services in New York *(see, Worldwide Futgol Assocs. v Event Entertainment, supra,*at 181). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, S. D. Shibulal, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infosys Limited for the year ended March 31, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Limited.
 /s/ S. D. SHIBULALDate: May 13, 2013
S. D. Shibulal

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1

 

GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES INCOME TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Government Properties Income Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $35,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $12,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Curtis J. Larrimer, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end if the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 10, 2005

/s/ Curtis J. LarrimerCurtis J. LarrimerChief Financial Officer
[ J

- 84

- 201 6 ] [M.O.

– Baer, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

KAREEM BARNES,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 36 EAP 2015

Appeal from the judgment of Superior
Court entered on 6/27/14 at No. 1784 EDA 2013 affirming the judgment of
sentence entered on 11/1/10 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, at No. CP

- 51

- CR

- 0005943

- 2009

ARGUED: September 13, 2016

CONCURRING OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: December 28, 2016

I join the majority’s specific holding that sentences violative of Alleyne v. United

States , ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013), are illegal sentences, alleviating the

requirement of issue preservation. 1 However, I do not support the majority’s decision to

adopt the lead opinion in Commonwealth v. Foster , 609 Pa. 502, 17 A.3d 332 (2011)

(plurality), since such expression favored a considerably broader litmus for the illegal

sentence doctrin e, and, in this respect, I maintain the concerns that I had voiced in

1 As the majority notes, this understanding does not apply to cases that have reached the post

- conviction stage, since the determination of whether final judgments of sentences are illegal under Alleyne depends upon whether Alleyne is retroactive to cases pending on post

- conviction review, see Commonwealth v. Washington , ___ Pa. ___, ___, 142 A.3d 810, 814

- 15 (2016), and this Court has concluded that it is not, see id. at ___, 142 A.3d at 820.[J

- 84

- 2016 ] [M.O.

– Baer, J.]

- 2

Foster

. See id. at 539

- 41, 17 A.3d at 355

- 56 (Saylor, J., concurring); accord id. at 525

-

39, 17 A.3d at 346

- 54 (Castille, C.J .) (cautioning that the approach of redefining the

concept of an illegal sentence to encompass all sentencing claims other than those

challenging purely discretionary aspects effectively disapproves decades of existing

Superior Court precedent and unduly o verrides salutary issue preservation

requirements across a broad array of sentencing challenges).

Justice Mundy joins this concurring opinion.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4844 

To ensure that amounts credited to the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 

are used for harbor maintenance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2010 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure that amounts credited to the Harbor Maintenance 

Trust Fund are used for harbor maintenance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR HARBOR MAINTENANCE PRO4 GRAMS. 

5 (a) HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND GUAR6 ANTEE.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The total budget resources 

8 made available from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 

9 Fund each fiscal year pursuant to section 9505(c) of 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4844 IH

1 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to ex2 penditures from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 

3 Fund) shall be equal to the level of receipts plus in4 terest credited to the Harbor Maintenance Trust 

5 Fund for that fiscal year. Such amounts may be 

6 used only for harbor maintenance programs de7 scribed in section 9505(c) of such Code. 

8 (2) GUARANTEE.—No funds may be appro9 priated for harbor maintenance programs described 

10 in such section unless the amount described in para11 graph (1) has been provided. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi13 nitions apply: 

14 (1) TOTAL BUDGET RESOURCES.—The term 

15 ‘‘total budget resources’’ means the total amount 

16 made available by appropriations Acts from the Har17 bor Maintenance Trust Fund for a fiscal year for 

18 making expenditures under section 9505(c) of the 

19 Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

20 (2) LEVEL OF RECEIPTS PLUS INTEREST.—The 

21 term ‘‘level of receipts plus interest’’ means the level 

22 of taxes and interest credited to the Harbor Mainte23 nance Trust Fund under section 9505 of the Inter24 nal Revenue Code of 1986 for a fiscal year as set 

25 forth in the President’s budget baseline projection as 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4844 IH

1 defined in section 257 of the Balanced Budget and 

2 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 

3 99–177) for that fiscal year submitted pursuant to 

4 section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. 

5 (c) ENFORCEMENT OF GUARANTEES.—It shall not be 

6 in order in the House of Representatives or the Senate 

7 to consider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, 

8 or conference report that would cause total budget re9 sources in a fiscal year for harbor maintenance programs 

10 described in subsection (b)(1) for such fiscal year to be 

11 less than the amount required by subsection (a)(1) for 

12 such fiscal year. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Denia Enterprises Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Norma Dority, Chief Executive

Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Norman Dority

---------------------------

Norman Dority

Chief Executive Officer

June 18, 2007
Brenda Lemus RODRIGUEZ v. Liliana Silverio LEMUS

No. 44P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Wesley E. Starnes, Attorney at Law, for Lemus, Liliana Silverio

Rachael A. LeClair, Attorney at Law, Brenda Lemus Rodriquez, for Rodriguez, Brenda Lemus

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th of February 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition in the Alternative filed by Defendant on the 14th of February 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."