alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syntony Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Michael Vardakis, President and Treasurer and Matthew C. Lords, Vice President
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 6/1/04                             /s/Michael Vardakis
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Michael Vardakis
                                         President, Treasurer and director


Date: 6/1/04                             /s/Matthew C. Lords
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Matthew C. Lords
                                         Vice President, Secretary and
                                         director
Dr. Robert CORWIN AS TRUSTEE FOR the BEATRICE CORWIN LIVING IRREVOCABLE TRUST, on Behalf of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC; Reynolds American, Inc.; Susan M. Cameron; John P. Daly ; Neil R. Withington; Luc Jobin; Sir Nicholas Scheele; Martin D. Feinstein; Ronald S. Rolfe; Richard E. Thornburgh; Holly K. Koeppel; Nana Mensah; Lionel L. Nowell, III; John J. Zillmer; and Thomas C. Wajnert

No. 56PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Alan W. Duncan, Attorney at Law, Stephen M. Russell, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jason M. Leviton, Attorney at Law, Joel A. Fleming, Attorney at Law, for Corwin, Robert (Dr.), et al.

Michael L. Robinson, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, H. Brent Helms, Attorney at Law, Gary A. Bornstein, Attorney at Law, for British American Tobacco PLC.

Ronald R. Davis, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, W. Andrew Copenhaver, Attorney at Law, James A. Dean, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Robert C. Micheletto, Attorney at Law, Thomas E. Lynch, Attorney at Law, Andrew S. Kleinfeld, Attorney at Law, for Reynolds American, Inc., et al.

James P. McLoughlin, Jr., Attorney at Law, Mark A. Nebrig, Attorney at Law, Jonathan M. Watkins, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Karen Seymour, Attorney at Law, Frank Schall, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Jobin, Luc, et al.

Alan M. Ruley, Attorney at Law, William K. Davis, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.

***ORDER***

*649Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 11th of January 2019 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N. C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-76692, 333-77690,333-76688, 333-32854 and 333-41394) pertaining to the eGain Communications Corporation 2000 Non-Management Stock Option Plan, the eGain Communications Corporation Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan, the Social Science, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan,the Big Science Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the eGain Communications Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated Inference Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 Non-Management StockOption Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 New Hire Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Charles W. Jepson Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Private Placement Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Fourth Amended andRestated Incentive Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and (Form S-3 No. 333-48314) pertaining to 22,373,370 Shares of Common Stock and the related Prospectus of our report dated August 8, 2003, except for Note 14 as towhich the date is September 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eGain Communications for the year ended June, 2003, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP

 

Palo Alto, California 

September 28, 2004
##### 



Pharma
Services Intermediate Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. GillingsExecutive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer August 12, 2005Date
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKIE JAMES CROSBY

No. 7121SC75

(Filed 3 February 1971)

Appeal by defendant from *Armstrong, Judge,*at the 10 August 1970 Criminal Session, Forsyth Superior Court.

By indictment proper in form, defendant was charged with (1) breaking and entering the Keith-Lowery Furniture Company store building, (2) felonious larceny of personal property valued at $1,139.00, and (3) feloniously receiving said property. He pleaded not guilty. For its verdict a jury found defendant guilty of storebreaking and felonious larceny. On the store-breaking count, the court imposed a prison sentence of seven to ten years. On the larceny count, the court imposed a prison sentence of seven to ten years, to begin at expiration of sentence on the storebreaking count, but suspended the prison sentence on certain conditions. From judgment imposing the sentences, defendant, an indigent, appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney Rieles for the State.*

*Curtiss Todd for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

The record on appeal in this case and the record on appeal in the case of *State v. Marquis DeLafayette Pitts*(No. 7121SC76) were filed in this Court on the same day. Oral arguments were heard in both cases on the same day but by different panels of the Court. The records disclose that although de*364fendants Crosby and Pitts were charged with the same offenses, they were charged in separate bills of indictment and were tried separately before the same judge at the same session of the court. They were represented at trial by the same attorney and he represents them both in this Court. Evidence for the State was substantially the same in both cases. At his trial Pitts testified and presented testimony of another witness; at his trial defendant Crosby presented no evidence. They were found guilty of the same charges and the court imposed similar sentences.

Briefs filed in this Court by Pitts and defendant Crosby are virtually identical, raising the same questions. No error was found in the Pitts case and Chief Judge Mallard, writing the opinion in that case, reviewed the evidence and discussed each of the quesions raised. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case, with particular reference to the questions raised in the brief, but conclude that for the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in the Pitts case, defendant Crosby’s trial was free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Hedrick concur.
Exhibit No. 99.1
February 9, 1999




Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chase Tower
220 Ross Avenue
Suite 1600
Dallas, TX  75201


Dear Sirs:

As of and for the year ending December 31, 1998, AMRESCO
Residential Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), a
subsidiary of AMRESCO, INC., has complied in all material
respects with the minimum servicing standards applicable to
Delinquencies and Insurance Policies as set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP).  The
company subservices all other minimum servicing standards
required under USAP to Wendover Funding, Inc. per the
Services Agreement dated October 1, 1997.  The Company
retains responsibility for all servicing activities related
to the loans.

For the period January 1, 1998 through December 30, 1998,
AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corporation had in effect a
fidelity bond in the amount of $23,000,000, errors and
omissions liability coverage in the amount of $10,000,000,
and mortgage impairment protection in the amount of
$23,000,000.  Beginning December 31, 1998, AMRESCO
Residential Mortgage Corporation increased its coverage,
resulting in a fidelity bond in the amount of $43,000,000
and mortgage impairment protection in the amount of
$43,000,000.  Errors and omissions liability coverage
remained at $10,000,000.



\s\ Peter J. Levasseur
Peter J. Levasseur                       
President                                
                                         
\s\ Patricia L. Wayman                         
Patricia L. Wayman                       
Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62012) pertaining to the
CompuCredit Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78409) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Amended and
Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92889) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117959) pertaining to the CompuCredit 2003 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 117960) pertaining to
the CompuCredit 2004 Restricted Stock Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115188) pertaining to common stock, preferred stock and debt securities of our report
dated February 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CompuCredit Corporation and subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

| |  | /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
| |  | --------------------

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 8, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trim Holding Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Louis Bertoli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ Louis Bertoli Louis Bertoli Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2010 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

 To authorize loan guarantees for projects to construct renewable fuel 
                               pipelines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2010

Mr. Boswell (for himself, Mr. Terry, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, Mr. Loebsack, 
  Mr. Latham, Mr. Foster, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Peterson) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
   Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and 
   Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize loan guarantees for projects to construct renewable fuel 
                               pipelines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Fuel Pipeline Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR PROJECTS TO CONSTRUCT RENEWABLE FUEL 
              PIPELINES.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 1701 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 
U.S.C. 16511) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Renewable fuel.--The term `renewable fuel' has the 
        meaning given the term in section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)), except that the term shall include 
        all ethanol and biodiesel.
            ``(7) Renewable fuel pipeline.--The term `renewable fuel 
        pipeline' means a pipeline for transporting renewable fuel.''.
    (b) Amount.--Section 1702(c) the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 
U.S.C. 16512(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A 
guarantee for a project described in section 1703(b)(11) shall be in an 
amount equal to 80 percent of the project cost of the facility that is 
the subject of the guarantee, as estimated at the time at which the 
guarantee is issued.''.
    (c) Renewable Fuel Pipeline Eligibility.--Section 1703(b) the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513(b)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
            ``(11) Renewable fuel pipelines.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TYRONE SPRINGS

No. 7226SC711

(Filed 22 November 1972)

Robbery § 4— armed robbery — sufficiency of evidence to withstand nonsuit

There was sufficient evidence to overrule defendant’s motion for nonsuit in a robbery case where the evidence tended to show that defendant and two others entered a clothing store, that defendant *642held a gun on the assistant manager of the store while an accomplice informed him that “this is a hold up” and that defendant and his accomplices took clothing from the store and money from the assistant manager and the cash register.

Appeal by defendant from *McLean, Judge,*17 April 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Mecklenburg County.

Defendant Tyrone Springs was tried on a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging him with the armed robbery of Jeffrey R. Gresko on 9 February 1972.

Upon the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the State offered evidence tending to show that the defendant, with two other men, entered the “Pants East” clothing store on North Tryon Street in the City of Charlotte at about 8:30 p.m. on 9 February 1972. At that time, Jeffrey R. Gresko, the assistant manager, and Rebecca Padgett, a clerk, were in the store alone. The defendant was wearing a green jacket with a hood pulled over his head. One of the men was wearing a red ski mask. The smallest of the three men asked the assistant manager to show him some pants. While the defendant was standing behind Gresko, pointing a gun at him, the smallest of the three men pulled out a gun, aimed it at Gresko, and stated “This is a holdup.” Gresko and Miss Padgett were then taken to the back of the store, bound and gagged and made to lie on the floor. After taking $42.00 from Gresko’s wallet, $240.00 from the cash register, 126 pairs of pants and 100 knit tops, the three men left the store.

The defendant offered evidence tending to establish an alibi.

The defendant was found guilty of armed robbery. From a judgment imposing a prison sentence of twenty-five years, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan and Associate Attorney Ann Reed for the State.*

*Frank H. Walker for defendant appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the denial of his timely motions for judgment as of nonsuit. There was ample evidence to require submission of this case to the jury and to support the verdict.

*643Assignments of error one, two and four relate to the admission and exclusion of testimony. We have carefully examined each exception upon which these assignments of error are based and find them to be without merit.

The defendant’s trial in the Superior Court was free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Graham concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARVIN FREEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-146

[April 26, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-1983-CF-001374-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Wildon Productions  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  July 31, 2006


/s/ Ekaterina Popoff
-------------------------------------
Ekaterina Popoff, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr ., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2254

___________ Judson Witham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Christian County, Missouri; Christian * County Sheriff’s Department; Joe * Matlock, Sheriff; Ron Cleek; Judge * [UNPUBLISHED] Waters; Judge Eiffert; Deputy * Forrester; Deputy Cowan; Kim Clark; * Judge Orr; Pat Wright, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 7, 2008 Filed: August 18, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Judson Witham appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with a court order. Having carefully-2- reviewed the record and considered With am’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group. Subcommittee F—Manpower & Training, NCI-F Initial Review of Manpower and Training Grants.                    

*Date:*                         October 25-26, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Crystal Gateway, 1700 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lynn M. Amende, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 8105, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4759,                         *amendel@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 27, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20234  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133879 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

JOHN A. DELAY,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133879 

 COA: 273118 

WCAC: 04-000501 

BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 

SERVICES CORPORATION, and 

LUMBERMAN’S MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk