alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,194)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,348
<PP&E>                                         162,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,942
<BONDS>                                        272,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (94,102)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,166
<SALES>                                        398,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          355,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  400,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,570)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,730)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,730)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (37,730)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (37,730)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
7  Daimler
AG and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratios of Earnings  (in
millions of , except ratios)  U.S. GAAP
  
  
  IFRS(3)Year Ended December 31,
  
  
  Year Ended December 31,2002
  
  2003
  
  2004
  
  2005
  
  2006
  
  
  
  2005
  
  2006
  
  2007EARNINGSIncome/(loss)
  from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interests, and
  cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles
  
  5,925
  
  596
  
  3,535
  
  3,376
  (2)
  4,021
  (2)
  
  
  2,426
  
  4,902
  
  9,181Add:Fixed charges
  
  4,102
  
  3,383
  
  3,199
  
  4,312
  
  4,649
  
  
  
  3,457
  
  3,714
  
  4,147Amortization of
  previously capitalized interest
  
  134
  
  119
  
  107
  
  104
  
  97
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Dividends
  received from equity investees
  
  133
  
  80
  
  107
  
  122
  
  159
  
  
  
  122
  
  159
  
  9Deduct:Capitalized
  interest
  
  (147
  )
  (100
  )
  (70
  )
  (73
  )
  (73
  )
  
  
  
  
  
  
  (Income)/loss
  from equity investees
  
  134
  
  538
  
  937
  
  (103
  )
  (318
  )
  
  
  (372
  )
  148
  
  399Earnings
  available for fixed charges
  
  10,281
  
  4,616
  
  7,815
  
  7,738
  
  8,535
  
  
  
  5,633
  
  8,923
  
  13,756FIXED CHARGESInterest expense
  
  3,709
  
  3,034
  
  2,828
  
  3,924
  
  4,256
  
  
  
  3,264
  
  3,526
  
  3,943Capitalized
  interest
  
  147
  
  100
  
  70
  
  73
  
  73
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Interest portion
  of rent expense(1)
  
  246
  
  249
  
  301
  
  315
  
  320
  
  
  
  193
  
  188
  
  204Total fixed
  charges
  
  4,102
  
  3,383
  
  3,199
  
  4,312
  
  4,649
  
  
  
  3,457
  
  3,714
  
  4,147RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  
  2.51
  
  1.36
  
  2.44
  
  1.79
  
  1.84
  
  
  
  1.63
  
  2.40
  
  3.32 
 (1)One third of all rental expenses is
deemed to be interest. (2)Income from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests, and cumulative effects of changes in
accounting principles under US-GAAP for the years 2005 and 2006 was
retroactively adjusted in connection with the first time adoption of IFRS. The
adjustements did not materially affect the results of the years 2005 or 2006. (3)The IFRS based numbers for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 have been adjusted to reflect the
presentation of the Chrysler activities as discontinued operations.
Exhibit 32



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gift Liquidators, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I
George Maxwell Colclasure, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           July 29, 2005

                                           /s/ George Maxwell Colclasure
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               George Maxwell Colclasure,
                                               Chief Executive Officer



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gift Liquidators, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I
Ronald G. Hurt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           July 29, 2005

                                           /s/ Ronald G. Hurt
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Ronald G. Hurt,
                                               Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Gift
Liquidators, Inc. and will be retained by Gift Liquidators, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10618

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE AVEJA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-232-2

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Aveja has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Aveja has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10618 Document: 00512048444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2012
STATE of North Carolina v. James Coleman HUGHES, Defendant.

No. COA18-631

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO PLAIN ERROR.
#### WALTER E. HELLER & COMPANY OF FLORIDA v. CONCORDIA LEG APPAREL, INC., OF N. C.; ART HOSIERY, INC.; CRAFTSMEN FINISHERS, INC.; JOSEPH ADAMS; SANFORD P. BRASS; LEONARD DeVRIES; JAMES W. WALSH

No. 7519SC19

(Filed 2 April 1975)

Appeal by defendants, Joseph Adams, Sanford P. Brass, Leonard DeVries and James W. Walsh, from *Long, Judge.*Judgment entered 5 November 1974 in Superior Court, CABARRUS County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 March 1975.

*Williams, Willeford, Boger & Grady by Samuel F. Davis, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.*

*Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger & Jonas, P.A., by T. LaFontine Odom for defendant appellants.*

BRITT, HEDRICK, and MARTIN, Judges.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10205 and <greek-i> 10206]


Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00004

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 09/24/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: 09/23/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 09/29/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

    Primary Parishes: Ascension, Saint Martin, Vernon, West Baton 
Rouge.
    Contiguous Parishes: Louisiana: East Baton Rouge, East 
Feliciana, Livingston, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Sabine, West 
Feliciana.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator, for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-20640 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### James SHELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-3760.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 13, 2003.

*913Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Karen Finkle, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

STEVENSON, J.

In March of 2002, James Shelton, the appellant, was on community control. Condition 1(a) of Shelton’s community control required that he “remain confined to [his] residence except one half hour before and after [his] approved employment, community service work, or any other activities approved by [his] officer.” The State filed an affidavit of violation, alleging that Shelton had violated this condition by failing to remain at his approved employment site on four days in March 2002. At the violation of community control hearing, Shelton’s employer testified that Shelton was not at work on the relevant dates. As a consequence of his failure to be at work, the trial court revoked Shelton’s community control.

It is well established that a defendant’s probation/community control cannot be revoked for conduct that is not prohibited or required by the order of probation/community control. *See, e.g., Meade v. State,*799 So.2d 430, 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(holding that probation could not be revoked for defendant’s failure to pay for a polygraph test as this was not a condition of probation); *Wright v. State,*687 So.2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(holding that probation could not be revoked for defendant’s failure to undergo DNA testing where probation order did not require such testing). Condition 1(a), the condition that Shelton was found to have violated, simply does not require him to be at his place of employment; rather, it requires him to be *at home*with some limited exceptions. Consequently, we reverse the order of revocation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MAY, J., and CHAVIES, MICHAEL B., Associate Judge, concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Melvin HUGHES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2115.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Hughes, Melvin;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 99-386.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of NanoSensors, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted
Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


By /s/ Ted Wong
   ------------------------------------------
   Ted Wong, Chief Executive Officer
   (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
   August 24, 2005

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.


                                      -18-
| (1)                       | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.  |

|         |                                 |                          |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|         |                                 |
|    |                            |                     |
|         | By:                        | /s/              Scott Miller |
|         | Scott              Miller            |
|         | Chief              Executive Officer |

|         |                                 | February              14,              2007 |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|         |                                 |
|    |                            |                                   |
|         | By:                        | /s/              Faith Forbis               |
|         | Faith              Forbis            |
|         | Chief              Financial Officer |
|         | February                14, 2007     |
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD v. William W. RICHARDSON and wife, Martha W. Richardson

No. 244A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Norman W. Shearin, Attorney at Law, David P. Ferrell, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Richardson, William W., et al

M.H. Hood Ellis, Attorney at Law, Benjamin Marshall Gallop, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth City, for Town of Nags Head

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 4th of September 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                      36
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                      36
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2625                    1250
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          4300                    4300
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6925)                  (5514)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                      36
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   695                     939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (695)                   (939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (695)                   (939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (695)                   (939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)                  (0.00)
        





</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIGUEL A. HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1872

[August 31, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2014CF010002A and 2014CF010161A.

Miguel A. Hernandez, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
JUSTUS v. ROSNER, et al.

255A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 2, 2019

K. Edward Greene, Attorney at Law, Tobias S. Hampson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Rosner, Michael J. (M.D.), et al.

Wade E. Byrd, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Justus, Billy Bruce.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of December 2018 by Tobias S. Hampson to Withdraw as Appellate Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of January 2019."
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00698

- CV
In the Interest of E.L., M.R., and H.R., Children

On Appeal from the 156th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Cause No. S

- 14

- 5251

- FL

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having c onsidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified bel ow for observance. April 9, 2015
NUMBER 13-13-00330-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

LA JOYA HOUSING 

AUTHORITY, Appellant,

v.

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC 

AND CHASE MANHATTAN 

MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, La Joya Housing Authority, perfected an appeal from a judgment 

entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number

C-1417-07-C. The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds 
2

that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been settled. The 

parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

The agreed motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In 

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring 

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax 

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

5th day of September, 2013.