alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4840 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                          May 25, 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4840) entitled ``An Act to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as 
the `Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office'.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 2, line 3, strike [1979] and insert 1981.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to designate the 
        facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1981 
        Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as the `Clarence D. Lumpkin 
        Post Office'.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 4840

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
**Exhibit
32**








**Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
Adopted**


**Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Arnold S. Lippa, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV
Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
Arnold S. Lippa


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Arnold S.
Lippa


Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President


March 15,
2005











****


**Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
Adopted**


**Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV Pharmaceutical,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Barbara
Duncan


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Barbara
Duncan


Chief Financial Officer


March 15,
2005





These
certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Opinion issued November 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00 731
- CV

——————————— AIMS ATM, LLC , Appellant

V. DARBAR, LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1002864

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, A IMS ATM , LLC, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § § 51.207 , 51.941(a) , 101.041 ( West 201 3 ); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts2

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1)

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 , 42.3(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees

. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wendell HARRISON, Sr.

No. 2003-KH-2182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 5, 2003.

In re Harrison, Wendell Sr.;—Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 92142; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH-03-0216.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the district court for its consideration.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Notice of Maximum Amount of Assistance Under the Individuals and 
Households Program, Notice of Maximum Amount of Repair Assistance, and 
Notice of Maximum Amount of Replacement Assistance

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the maximum amounts for assistance under 
the Individuals and Households Program for emergencies and major 
disasters declared on or after October 1, 2005.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2005 and applies to major disasters declared 
on or after October 1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berl Jones, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4235.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 
5174, prescribes that FEMA must annually announce the maximum amounts 
for assistance provided under the Individuals and Households (IHP) 
Program. FEMA gives notice that the maximum amount of IHP financial 
assistance provided to an individual or household under section 408 of 
the Act with respect to any single emergency or major disaster is 
$27,200. The maximum amount of Repair Assistance is $5,400, and the 
maximum amount of Replacement Assistance is $10,900. The increases in 
award amounts as stated above are for any single emergency or major 
disaster declared on or after October 1, 2005.
    FEMA bases the adjustments on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 3.6 percent for the 12-month period 
ended in August 2005. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 15, 2005.

    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Individuals 
and Households--Housing; 97.049 Individuals and Households--Disaster 
Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households--Other Needs)
R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-20292 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2957021-FEB-201309:54 AM
#### Jose BONILLA v. COMMODORE CRUISE LINES LIMITED and ABC Insurance Company.

No. 2003-C-1226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Bonilla, Jose;—Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. D, *1038No. 96-11320; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-CA-2182.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4878 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4878

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax on 
        corporations that make certain education contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2010

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax on 
        corporations that make certain education contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Cut Job Creation Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Reduction for Certain Contributions.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a qualified corporation, 
        the amount of tax imposed by subsection (a) for the taxable 
        year (determined without regard to this subsection) shall be 
        reduced by an amount equal to 5 percent of so much of the 
        taxable income of the corporation for such taxable year as 
        exceeds $75,000.
            ``(2) Qualifying corporation.--For purposes of this 
        subsection--
                    ``(A) Qualified corporation.--The term `qualifying 
                corporation' means a corporation the aggregate amount 
                of specified contributions of which for the taxable 
                year are not less than an amount equal to 20 percent of 
                an amount equal to 5 percent of so much of the taxable 
                income of the corporation for the taxable year as 
                exceeds $75,000.
            ``(3) Specified contributions.--The term `specified 
        contributions' means--
                    ``(A) the charitable contributions (as defined in 
                section 170(c)) of the corporation for the taxable year 
                to organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 
                and
                    ``(B) the wages (as defined in section 3121(a)) 
                paid by the corporation to interns as part of a 
                vocational educational course of such an 
                organization.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
In the MATTER OF: S.S.S. and S.R.S.

No. COA18-514

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 5, 2019

Woodruff Law Firm, PA, Greensboro, by Carolyn J. Woodruff and Jessica Snowberger Bullock, for petitioner-appellee mother

Mark L. Hayes, for respondent-appellant father.

MURPHY, Judge.

Respondent-father ("Respondent") appeals from orders terminating his parental rights. Respondent's appellate counsel filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Rule 3.1(d) stating that, after a conscientious and thorough review of the record on appeal, he has concluded that the record contains no issue of merit on which to base an argument for relief. N.C. R. App. P. 3.1(d) (2019). Appellate counsel provided Respondent with copies of the no-merit brief, trial transcript, and record on appeal and advised him of his right to file a brief *pro se* with this Court; however, Respondent did not exercise his right to file a *pro se* brief. Accordingly, no issues have been argued or preserved in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. *In re L.V.* , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 814 S.E.2d 928, 929 (2018) ; *In re I.B.* , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 822 S.E.2d 472, 477 (2018) (detailing "settled rules of interpretation [that] support a conclusion that we are not required to conduct an independent review of the record under the text of Rule 3.1(d) as it is written").

DISMISSED.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Judge HUNTER, JR. concurs.

Chief Judge McGEE dissents in a separate opinion.

McGEE, Chief Judge, dissenting.

Based on the rationale in my dissenting opinion in *In re L.E.M.* , --- N.C. App. ----, 820 S.E.2d 577 (2018), I believe this Court is required to conduct an *Anders* -type review when a no-merit brief is filed pursuant to the requirements of N.C.R. App. P. 3.1(d). Based on a review of the record, I am unable to find any prejudicial error by the trial court in ordering termination of Respondent's parental rights. A review of the record reveals that the termination order includes sufficient findings of fact, supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, to support at least one ground for termination. *See**In re Taylor* , 97 N.C. App. 57, 64, 387 S.E.2d 230, 233-34 (1990) (A finding of any one of the separately enumerated grounds is sufficient to support termination.). Moreover, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that termination of Respondent's parental rights was in the best interests of S.S.S. and S.R.S. *See* N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1110 (2017). Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court's orders.
IN RE: Foreclosure of Real Property Under Deed of Trust from Melvin R. CLAYTON and Jackie B. Clayton, in the original amount of $165,000.00, and dated June 13, 2008 and recorded on June 18, 2008 in Book 2083 at Page 506, Henderson County Registry

Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, Substitute Trustee

No. 296P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Matthew S. Roberson, Asheville, William J. Whalen, Attorneys at Law, For Clayton, Jackie B. (aka Jacqueline B. Clayton)

Baxter Chad Ewing, Attorney at Law, For Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of September 2017 by Respondent (Jackie B. Clayton) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Jackie B. Clayton) on the 5th of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of *867certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of September 2017 by Respondent (Jackie B. Clayton) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Jackie B. Clayton) on the 15th of September 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0696

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SARAH LOUISE CARPENTER,

a/k/a SKINNER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and good

cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including September 7, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2020

07/31/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0696
Exhibit 13.1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, S. Gopalakrishnan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Technologies Limited.






Date: May 6, 2011






/s/ S. GOPALAKRISHNAN







S. Gopalakrishnan


Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Noui PHACHOUMPHONE

65PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2019

William D. Spence, Attorney at Law, Kinston, for Phachoumphone, Noui.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of January 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of January 2019."
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz, Chief
Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 9, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60381-60382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10205 and <greek-i> 10206]


Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00004

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 9/24/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: 9/23/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 10/03/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 6/26/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Parishes: Evangeline, Jefferson,

[[Page 60382]]

Plaquemines, Sabine, Saint Landry.
Contiguous Parishes/Counties:
    Louisiana: Avoyelles, De Soto, Orleans, Saint Bernard, Saint 
Tammany, Tangipahoa.
    Texas: Sabine, Shelby.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-20639 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Availability of a Novel Fiberglass Technology for 
Exclusive, Partially Exclusive or Non-Exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to 
a novel fiberglass technology (e-glass; s-glass) as described in U.S. 
Patent Application No. 10/724,704; entitled ``Nano-Textured Solid 
Surfaces and Methods for Producing Same''; Jensen and McKnight. Any 
license shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: 
AMSRL-DP-T/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, 
Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20504 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
March 2, 1999 on Excel Paralubes included in this Form 10-K into Pennzoil-Quaker
State Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos.
333-69833, 333-69835, 333-69839, 333-69837, and 333-72835 and on Form S-3 No.
333-65909.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Houston, Texas
March 12, 1999
Casey Industrial, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2015

No. 04-14-00429-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

CASEY INDUSTRIAL, INC.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-06252

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason K. William, Justice

On February 3, 2015, this court issued an order withdrawing our December 31, 2014 

opinion and judgment in this appeal. Appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration is moot. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court