alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending September 23, 2005

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (see 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22552.
    Date Filed: September 22, 2005.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 13, 2005.
    Description: Application of ABX Air, Inc. requesting issuance of a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in scheduled 
foreign air transportation of property and mail between any point or 
points in the United States and any point in the countries listed in 
Appendix A to the application.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-20400 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7871

DUKE E. WOODLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-96-582)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duke E. Woodley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Appellant claims that he never received the order imposing

the partial filing fee. Appellant may file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

motion for reconsideration, or because the action was dismissed

without prejudice, he may refile the action.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with

Local Rule 28(C) for the Eastern District of Virginia, and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply

with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.* We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Edith Gertrude Tydings, *Appellant,*v. Charley R. Tydings, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 8, 1928.

*422
      *W. E. Smith,*for Appellant;

*Anderson & Anderson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered’ and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Martavious Lehomer ALLEN

No. COA18-195

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 16, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART, VACATED IN PART, REMANDED.
Beverly M. SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. Derek Shea ENLOE and Wife, Lisa A. Enloe, Defendants.

No. COA18-617

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 12.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Gentry Resources Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  June 23, 2003





/s/ Hugh G. Ross



Hugh G. Ross

President and Chief Executive Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
# German-American Day, 2005

German Americans have played an important role in establishing America as a land where liberty is protected for all of its citizens. Each year on German-American Day, we celebrate the contributions the millions of Americans of German descent have made to our great Nation.

Among the early German immigrants, many saw America as a beacon of religious freedom and an opportunity for an improved standard of living. German immigrants helped pioneer the first American colony at Jamestown. Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg served as the first Speaker of the House of Representatives; in this role, he certified the final version of the Bill of Rights.

Throughout our country's history, men and women of German descent have worn the uniform of the United States military to defend our country's freedom. Among these were Admiral Chester Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the United States Pacific Fleet during World War II, and General Dwight D. Eisenhower, who went on to become one of America's Presidents of German ancestry. Today, German-American troops continue to serve proudly in our Nation's Armed Forces.

German Americans have enriched many other aspects of American life. Albert Einstein's advancements in the field of physics help define our understanding of the universe. Theodor Seuss Geisel, more commonly known as Dr. Seuss, has captivated the imaginations of children for generations with his timeless classics. Baseball great Lou Gehrig's courage on and off the field continues to inspire the American spirit more than 60 years after his death.

On German-American Day, we also honor the important friendship between the United States and Germany. Our nations share beliefs in human rights and dignity, and on this day, I join all Americans in celebrating the bonds that tie our two nations and in reaffirming the importance of our continuing friendship.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2005, as German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to celebrate the many contributions German Americans have made to our Nation's liberty and prosperity.                              ( print page 59208)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-20485

Billing code 3195-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PETER CHAMBRE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge Antibody
Technology Group plc (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Peter Chambre, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

                                                          Date: October 14, 2003



                                          /s/ Peter Chambre
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Peter Chambre
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. US Precious Metals, Inc. Dated: October 20, 2011  /s/ Gennaro PaneGennaro Pane(Chief Executive Officer)(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT K. HUDNALL and SHARON

E. HUDNALL,

Appellants,

v.

SMITH AND RAMIREZ

RESTORATION, L.L.C.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00217

- CV

Appeal from the

448 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2015DCV1113 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the attempted appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction , in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We

therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Barajas, Senior Judge

Barajas, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1998-2
$ 153,615,935.94 5.91% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %

          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2001   2,141,679     200,754     311,302    9.53%    6,910,772   17.63%
 Feb-2001   2,027,659     190,206     118,322    3.83%    6,545,057   17.65%
 Mar-2001   2,311,745     180,220     125,118    4.32%    5,380,587   15.49%
 Apr-2001   2,478,029     168,835     165,085    6.15%    4,889,169   15.19%
 May-2001   2,040,138     156,631     171,540    6.83%    4,829,808   16.03%
 Jun-2001   2,151,889     146,583     174,932    7.53%    4,984,417   17.87%
 Jul-2001   1,866,725     135,985      96,677    4.47%    4,685,903   18.04%
 Aug-2001   2,029,306     126,791     155,549    7.77%    4,798,471   19.98%
 Sep-2001   1,856,486     116,797     153,232    8.30%    4,008,646   18.09%
 Oct-2001   1,509,409     107,654      72,249    4.21%    3,832,796   18.59%
 Nov-2001   1,707,410     100,220      76,747    4.87%    3,521,224   18.63%
 Dec-2001   1,497,412      91,811      67,910    4.68%    3,205,048   18.42%

          ____________ ___________ ___________
  Totals   23,617,888   1,722,486   1,688,663

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
STATE v. George Lee NOBLES

34PA14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 5, 2019

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Nobles, George Lee.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of March 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of March 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 5th day of April 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
JAMES v. RABBANI

79P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2019

William Paul James, for James, William Paul.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of March 2019 by Plaintiff for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of March 2019."
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Tamara A. Seymour,certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this amendment to the report on Form 10-Q of Favrille, Inc.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: October 30, 2007

 
|   | By:    |   | /s/ Tamara A. Seymour                      |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Tamara A. Seymour                          |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and                |
|   |   |   | Vice President, Finance and Administration |
|   |   |   | *(Principal Financial Officer)*            |

 

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 14, 2018

NO. 03

- 19

- 00263

- CR

Aaron Richard Davison, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GO ODWI N, BAKER, AND KELLY MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment revoking community supervision entered by the tr i a l court.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in

the court’s judgment revoking community supervision requiring rev ersal

. However, there was

error in the judgment revoking community supervision that requires correction. Therefore, the

Court modifies the trial court’s judgment revoking community supervision to reflect that the

“ Off ense for which Defendant Convicted ” is “ Failure to Stop and Ren der Ai d ” and that

appellant ’ s “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate” was “ T r ue .” The judgment revoking community

supervision , as modified , is affirmed

. Because a p pellant is indigent and u nabl e to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
SYKES, et al. v. HEALTH NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.

251PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 31, 2018

Robert E. Fields, III, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorneys at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, Leon E. Porter, Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorneys at Law, Winston-Salem, for Sykes, Susan, et al.

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Benjamin R. Norman, Greensboro, W. Michael Dowling, Attorneys at Law, for Health Network Solutions, Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of October 2018 by Plaintiffs to Seal Portions of Appellants' Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of October 2018."
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JK / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ARTA CONCEP CI ON ORTI ZCA N A S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70606 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 289- 325 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a rt aC onc e pc i on O rt i z - C a na s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f orpr ot e c t i on unde rthe 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ K / Res ea r ch 08- 70606 2 Co n v e n t i o n A g a i n s tTo rtu r e ( “ CA T” ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Si laya v. Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1066, 1070 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se a l th o u g h th e r e c o r de v i d e n c e i n d i c a t e s th a twi d e s p r e a dg a n g v i o l e n c e e x i s t s i n El S a l va dor , O rt i z - C a na s f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nottha ts he w o u ldb e to rtu r e db yth e g o v e rn m e n t o rw ith th e g o v e rn m e n t’s a c q u ie s c e n c e . See id. a t1073. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

s0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137744

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137744 COA: 283682 Oakland CC: 2004-197425-FC ERNEST DEWITT CRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE No. 73301-0-1 es>

I rip?
<J*rn*r\ STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. SALLYEA MCCLINTON, Appellant. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

~ <&* FILED: March 7, 2016 

### Verellen, A.C.J. —Sallyea McClintonappeals from an order imposing 300 days' confinementfor five willful violations of his community custody conditions. McClinton contends the trial court's reliance on hearsay statements, absentfindings ofgood cause or 

### reliability, violated his rightto due process. Because this issue is moot, and McClinton provides no argumentthat the public interest exception applies, we dismiss this appeal. FACTS In 1997, McClinton was convicted of first degree rape while armed with a deadly 

### weapon, firstdegree attempted rape, and firstdegree burglary. The trial court imposed a sentence of 226 months followed by two years of community custody. Upon his release 

### from prison, McClinton was required to abide byseveral community custody conditions. In 2013, McClintonbegan his term of community custody. In 2014, McClinton was 

### alleged to have violated five community custody conditions. At McClinton's sentence 

### modification hearing on February 19, 2015, his communitycorrections officerJohn ChinnNo. 73301-0-1/2 testified. Officer Chinn's testimony included hearsay statements supporting the alleged violations. The trial courtfound McClinton had violated five community custody conditions. 

### The trial court imposed 60 days foreach violation, to be served consecutively, for a total of 300 days' confinement. McClintonhas served his confinement. He was released on August 3, 2015. McClinton appeals the trial court's sentence modification order. ANALYSIS McClinton contends the trial court's reliance on hearsay statements, absentfindings 

### of good cause orreliability, violated his rightto due process under the standards enunciated in State v. Abd-Rahmaan.1 But this issue is moot. McClinton has already 

### served the term ofconfinement imposed forthese violations of his community custody 

### conditions, so we cannot provide any meaningful relief.2 McClinton provides no argument that the public interest exception applies. We dismiss this appeal as moot.

WE CONCUR: 

# £^///

1 154 Wn.2d 280, 111 P.3d 1157 (2005). 2In re Detention of Cross, 99 Wn.2d 373, 376-77, 662 P.2d 828 (1983) ("Acase is moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief.").
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4739 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4739

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the limit 
on the amount of certain contributions which may be made to a candidate 
            with respect to an election for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2010

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the limit 
on the amount of certain contributions which may be made to a candidate 
            with respect to an election for Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO 
              INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES.

    (a) Reduction in Limit.--Section 315(a)(1)(A) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(1)(A)) is amended by 
striking ``$2,000'' and inserting ``$1,000''.
    (b) Application of Indexing.--
            (1) In general.--Section 315(c)(1)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
        441a(c)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``after 2002'' and 
        inserting ``after 2002 (or, in the case of the limitation 
        established under subsection (a)(1)(A), after 2012)''.
            (2) Determination of base period.--Section 315(c)(2)(B) of 
        such Act (2 U.S.C. 441a(c)(2)(B)) is amended--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (ii)--
                            (i) by striking ``(a)(1)(A),'', and
                            (ii) by striking the period at the end and 
                        inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(iii) for purposes of subsection (a)(1)(A), 
                calendar year 2011.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring after December 2010.
                                 <all>
```