alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Appeal of Decision of DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 00-PDB-341.

No. 2003-OB-2009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Kovacs, Elmer A.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 00-PDB-341.

Leave to appeal denied.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4822 

To provide for the settlement of claims arising from the failure of the 

Natural Resource Conservation Service (and former Soil Conservation 

Service) to carry out the Houlka Creek Watershed Project in Mississippi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2010 

Mr. CHILDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for the settlement of claims arising from the 

failure of the Natural Resource Conservation Service 

(and former Soil Conservation Service) to carry out the 

Houlka Creek Watershed Project in Mississippi. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE 

4 SETTLEMENT OF HOULKA CREEK WATER5 SHED PROJECT CLAIMS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Chief 

7 of the Natural Resources Conservation Service shall use 

8 discretionary funds available to the Natural Resources 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4822 IH

1 Conservation Service to provide funds for the settlement 

2 of claims associated with the Houlka Creek Watershed 

3 Project in Mississippi to close out this project. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 19.13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AngloGold Ashanti Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending 31 December 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                  |  | 
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: 14 April 2014 |  | /s/ Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan   |  | 
|                    |  | Name: Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan |  | 
|                    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer   |  | 
|                    |  |                                 
|Date: 14 April 2014 |  | /s/ Richard Duffy                |  | 
|                    |  | Name: Richard Duffy              |  | 
|                    |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer   |  | 



E-8
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. STEIN, et al.

339A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2019

Paul Stam, Attorney at Law, Apex, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education.

Amy O'Neal, Attorney at Law, for De Luca, Francis X., et al.

Jennie Wilhelm Hauser, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Mary MacLean Asbill, Attorney at Law, Brooks Rainey Pearson, Attorney at Law, Blakely E. Hildebrand, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Coastal Federation, et al.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Lindsey Vance Smith, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Allison Schafter, Attorney at Law, for NC School Boards Association.

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy.

R. Daniel Gibson, Attorney at Law, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education.

*394The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 25th of February 2019 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 22nd day of March 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Independent Auditors Report and Consent The Board of Directors
Infosys Technologies Limited We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-32196) on Form S-8 of Infosys Technologies Limited of our report dated
April 13, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Infosys
Technologies Limited as of March 31, 2004, and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2004, and the related Financial Statement Schedule, which report
appears in the March 31, 2004, annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys
Technologies Limited. Manchester, UK
    
    KPMG LLPMay 6, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Board of Directors of SPG Realty Consultants, Inc.
(formerly known as Corporate Realty Consultants, Inc.),

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
and cash flows of SPG Realty Consultants, Inc. (formerly known as Corporate
Realty Consultants, Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 1997. These financial
statements are the responsibility of SPG Realty Consultants, Inc.'s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and
cash flows of SPG Realty Consultants, Inc. (formerly known as Corporate Realty
Consultants, Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.



                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, NY
June 30, 1998

                                      51
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOG IES, LLC, Appellant

v.

DISH NETWORK CORPORA TION, DISH NETWORK LLC, Cross

- Appellants

______________________

2019

- 1002, 2019

- 1003, 2019

- 1027, 2019

- 1029

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2017

- 00717, IPR2017

- 00724.

_______ _______________

ORDER

______________________

Before P ROST
, Chief Judge, D YK and M OORE
, Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

. In light of our disposition in Customedia Tech s. , LLC v. Dish Network Corp

. , No s

. 18

- 2239, 19

- 1000 , we dismiss this case as moot. Case: 19-1002 Document: 75 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2020CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOG IES
, LLC v. DISH NETWORK

CORPORATION 2

F OR THE C OURT

March 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 19-1002 Document: 75 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2020
STATE of North Carolina v. James Howard TERRELL, Jr.

No. 55A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, James Howard Terrell, Jr., Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Terrell, James Howard (Jr.).

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 22nd of February 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

*107Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 13th of March 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed as to Issues I and III only by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Accordingly, the new brief of the State of NC shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
## **Exhibit 32.1**

## ** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC.**

**UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBlue Ridge Paper Products Inc. (the “Company”) certify pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d),and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  May 16, 2005 |
|---------------------|
|                |
| ** **          | ** ** | **/S/  RICHARD A. LOZYNIAK** | ** ** | ** ** |
|                | Richard  A. Lozyniak |   |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                |   |   |
| ** **          | ** ** | **/S/  JOHN B. WADSWORTH** | ** ** | ** ** |
|                | John  B. Wadsworth |   |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-71481, No. 333-85638 and No. 333-141493) of Entercom Communications Corp. of our report dated February 9, 2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/   PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
|----------------------------------|
| Philadelphia,   Pennsylvania     |
| February 9,   2011          |

 

----
#### Richard Arlen LEPPERT a/k/a Richard A. Leppert, Jr., a/k/a Richard A. Leppert, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-4113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SALCINES, Judge.

Richard Arlen Leppert a/k/a Richard A. Leppert, Jr., a/k/a Richard A. Leppert, II, *609has appealed the revocation of his community control in trial court case numbers 98-3929-CF, 98-4052-CF, 99-16-CF, and 99-17-CF. The public defender filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether the trial court erred in revoking Leppert’s community control and in imposing the sentences thereon. In a pro se supplemental brief Leppert also challenges his sentences.

We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Leppert’s community control. *See Brown v. State,*813 So.2d 202, 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The sentences orally announced by the trial court are legal; however, the written sentences in cases 98-3929-CF, 98-4052-CF, and 99-16-CF do not comport with the oral pronouncements and must be remanded for correction of scrivener’s errors. *See Allison v. State,*825 So.2d 504, 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we affirm the convictions, affirm the sentence imposed in case 99-17-CF; and remand the sentences in cases 98-3929-CF, 98-4052-CF, and 99-16-CF for correction of scrivener’s errors.

Affirmed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4834 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4834

  To amend section 493C of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to limit 
 student loan payments to 10 percent of discretionary income, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2010

 Mr. Schauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 493C of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to limit 
 student loan payments to 10 percent of discretionary income, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Student Debt Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. INCOME-BASED REPAYMENT.

    Section 493C of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1098e) 
is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) of subsection 
        (a)(3)(B), by striking ``15 percent'' and inserting ``10 
        percent''; and
            (2) in the matter preceding clause (i) of subsection 
        (b)(7)(B), by striking ``25 years'' and inserting ``20 years''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
February 18, 2005, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be 
covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-
committees, (4) Discussion/approval of projects, (5) Old Business, (6) 
Matters before the group-discussion only, and (7) Next agenda and 
meeting date.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 18, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 12 
noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, 
located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo 
Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d7f65787f794d6b7e236b686923787e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a18021f181e2a0c19440c0f0e441f19">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Persons 
who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff by May 18, 2004. Public 
comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the 
meeting.

    Dated: January 24, 2005.
Blaine Baker,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-2030 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PATRICIA DAGAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4828 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed May 15, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

### Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record after brief was filed), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, 

### SILBERMAN , and 

### ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM , JJ., Concur.
No. 17,511.

#### The Denco Realty Company, etc. *v.*Joe Panek, Jr.

(283 P. [2d] 1085)

Decided May 23, 1955.

Mr. H Gordon Howard, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. E. F. Riggs, for defendant in error.

*565
      *En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
In the MATTER OF: E.B.J.

No. COA18-633

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated March 11, 1999 included in this Form 10-K, into
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form
S-8 Nos. 333-69833, 333-69835, 333-69839, 333-69837, and 333-72835 and on Form
S-3 No. 333-65909.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Houston, Texas
March 15, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY 2, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,975
<INVENTORY>                                     37,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,347
<PP&E>                                          37,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,001
<BONDS>                                         76,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           29,771
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,498
<SALES>                                        160,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,325
<CGS>                                           88,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                47,048
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,932)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (26.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (26.20)
        

</TABLE>
Angela Meshell BLUITT v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, Wake Forest University, North Carolina Baptist Hospital, and Evan Rubery, MD

No. 149P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Java O. Warren, Attorney at Law, for Bluitt, Angela Meshell.

Christopher A. White, Attorney at Law, for Bluitt, Angela Meshell.

D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, et al.

Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, for Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, et al.

Joshua O. Harper, Attorney at Law, for Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
**Exhibit 19.15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-113789 of AngloGold Ashanti Limited of our reports dated 31 March 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of AngloGold Ashanti Limited and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AngloGold Ashanti Limited included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended 31 December 2015. 

/s/ Ernst & Young Inc. 

Ernst & Young Inc. 

Registered Auditor 

Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa

31 March 2016 

 
E-9
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4861 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4861 EH

1 SECTION 1. STEVE GOODMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in 

4 Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4861 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Steve Goodman al Service located at 1343 West Irving Park
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PRESTON WAYNE WALTERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 280 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.