alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4760 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require individuals to 

provide their Social Security number in order to claim the first-time 

homebuyer tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

individuals to provide their Social Security number in 

order to claim the first-time homebuyer tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First-Time Homebuyer 

5 Tax Credit Eligibility Verification Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED FOR FIRST7 TIME HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 36 of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4760 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), (3), 

2 and (4) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D), re3 spectively, 

4 (2) by moving such subparagraphs 2 ems to the 

5 right, 

6 (3) by striking ‘‘No credit’’ and inserting the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No credit’’, and 

9 (4) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

10 (C), by striking the period at the end of paragraph 

11 (D) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end 

12 the following: 

13 ‘‘(E) the taxpayer does not include the tax14 payer’s social security number on the return of 

15 tax for such taxable year. 

16 ‘‘(2) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a joint 

17 return, the requirement of subparagraph (E) shall 

18 be treated as met if the social security number of ei19 ther spouse is included on such return. 

20 ‘‘(3) OMISSION TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

21 CLERICAL ERROR.—Any failure to meet the require22 ment of subparagraph (E) shall be treated as a 

23 mathematical or clerical error and assessed accord24 ing to section 6213(b)(1).’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4760 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to residences purchased after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.02 Pharma Services Intermediate Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma Services Intermediate Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Ratliff, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John D. RatliffJohn D. RatliffChief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2005Date
 This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether
made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that,
to my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    ERIC N.
SMITEric N. SmitSeptember 25, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided
to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140789 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140789 

 COA: 290603 

Ionia CC: 2008-014149-FH 

BRADLEY SCOTT LASCO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Martha J. TANNER, Appellant, v. Stephen C. TANNER, Appellee.

No. 1D02-4035.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 21, 2003.

Gary N. Holthus, Esquire, Gainesville, for Appellant.

John R. Nettles, Esquire, Gainesville, for Appellee.

*611PER CURIAM.

Appellee concedes the trial judge erred by including a provision in the Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution, not requested by the parties, that terminates the former wife’s entitlement to periodic alimony upon remarriage or cohabitation, whichever comes first. *See Bridges v. Bridges,*842 So.2d 983, 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)(agreeing that Florida law does not recognize cohabitation as a basis for automatic termination of court ordered alimony). The amended final judgment is reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to strike that portion of the judgment automatically terminating the former wife’s periodic alimony upon cohabitation.

We find no merit in the any of the other issues raised by the former wife on appeal or by the former husband’s cross-appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and remanded with instructions.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4938 

AN ACT 

To permit the use of previously appropriated funds to extend 

the Small Business Loan Guarantee Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4938 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SMALL BUSINESS LOAN GUAR2 ANTEE PROGRAM. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS.—Up to $40,000,000 

4 of the amount made available under the heading ‘‘Small 

5 Business Administration—Business Loans Program Ac6 count’’ in title V of division C of the Consolidated Appro7 priations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–117) also may be 

8 utilized for fee reductions and eliminations under section 

9 501 of title V of division A of the American Recovery and 

10 Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5) and for 

11 the cost of guaranteed loans under section 502 of such 

12 title. Such costs, including the cost of modifying such 

13 loans, shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congres14 sional Budget Act of 1974. 

15 (b) EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE.—Section 502(f) 

16 of title V of division A of the American Recovery and Rein17 vestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5) is amended by 

18 striking ‘‘March 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 

19 2010’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4938 

AN ACT 

To permit the use of previously appropriated funds 

Program, and for other purposes. to extend the Small Business Loan Guarantee
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1384

STEWART B. ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-302-A)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stewart B. Allen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), his civil action seeking to

enjoin the Internal Revenue Service from collecting unpaid taxes,

penalties and interest. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Commissioner, No. CA-96-302-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michael Anthony TAYLOR v. Carlos HERNANDEZ, Superintendent of Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution

No. 301P16-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 22, 2019

Michael Anthony Taylor, for Taylor, Michael Anthony

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 22nd of January 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Brunswick County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2019 by Petitioner for Notice of Constitutional Challenge:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2019 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2019."
Grace Patricia RATHKAMP (Formerly Grace Rathkamp Danello), Plaintiff, v. Timothy F. DANELLO, Defendant.

No. COA17-760

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 4, 2018

AFFIRM IN PART. DISMISS IN PART. REVERSE. REMAND IN PART. VACATE IN PART.
#### Dorothy A. WEATHERTON v. ISLE OF CAPRI CASINO.

No. 2003-C-0365.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Weatherton, Dorothy A.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s order dated June 6, 2003, Office of Worker’s Compensation District 1 W, Nos. 99-03544, 98-02844, 01-06857, 01-6855, 35-698CM, 98-02844; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 36343-WCA, 36,682-WCA.

Reconsideration denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., recused.
## 

EXHIBIT 99.2

Report of Independent Public Accountants

To
the Members of
Global Materials Services LLC
(formerly Mid-South Terminal Company):

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of GLOBAL MATERIALS SERVICES LLC (a Tennessee limited liability company, the "Company") and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, partners' capital and comprehensive income and cash flows (not presented separately herein) for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial
statements of Arrow Terminals BV, Vlissingen (Arrow BV), which statements reflect total assets and total revenues of 9 percent and 10 percent in 1999, respectively, of the related
consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those entities, is based
solely on the report of the other auditors.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above (not presented separately herein) present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Global Materials Services and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Arthur
Anderson LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
March 28, 2000



## QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George M. Lee, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    GEORGE M.
LEE   
|George M. Lee          
|Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4861 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4861

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Steve 
                    Goodman Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STEVE GOODMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Steve Goodman Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Steve 
Goodman Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, George A. Burnett, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Dex Media, Inc. (the“Registrant”), and Scott Pomeroy, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theRegistrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. The Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Reportand results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.Date:November 10, 2005   /s/ George A. Burnett /s/ Scott A. Pomeroy   George A. Burnett Scott A. PomeroyPresident and Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial Officer)
# Fire Prevention Week, 2005

Each year, fires kill or injure thousands of Americans and destroy or damage billions of dollars worth of property. Many of these fires might have been prevented by taking appropriate precautions and following safety guidelines. During Fire Prevention Week, we highlight the need to prevent and prepare for fires, and we raise awareness of fire safety. We also honor our Nation's brave firefighters.

Each year, the National Fire Protection Association and the Department of Homeland Security's United States Fire Administration raise awareness during Fire Prevention Week. This year's theme is “Use Candles with Care.” Although the number of home fires has declined in recent years, the number of fires caused by candles has risen dramatically. Fortunately, the risk of candle fires can be lessened by following a few basic guidelines, including never leaving candles unattended, keeping them away from flammable items, and always keeping them out of reach of children.

While many fires can be prevented by following precautions, families should still be prepared for the possibility of a fire by having working smoke alarms on every level of their homes. Families should also have a fire escape plan in place to help get everyone out of the home safely in case of an emergency.

When fires occur, Americans depend on our courageous firefighters to be first on the scene and to save lives. Each year, more than 100 of our country's firefighters die in the line of duty. Americans are grateful for the brave men and women who put themselves in harm's way to rescue and protect their fellow citizens. During Fire Prevention Week, we recognize these heroes and honor their sacrifice.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 9 through October 15, 2005, as Fire Prevention Week. On Sunday, October 9, 2005, in accordance with Public Law 107-51, the flag of the United States will be flown at half-staff on all Federal office buildings in honor of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service. I invite the people of the United States to participate in this observance by flying our Nation's flag over their homes at half-staff on this day, to mark this week with appropriate programs and activities, and to renew efforts throughout the year to prevent fires and their tragic consequences.                              ( print page 59978)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-20655

Billing code 3195-01-P
STATE v. Michael Patrick RYAN

366A10-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 13, 2019

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, William Massengale, Chapel Hill, For Ryan, Michael Patrick

Kelvin Atkinson, William Stevenson, Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant District Attorneys, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Locke Bell, Attorney at Law, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of February 2019 by Defendant to Correct Certificate of Service in Defendant-Appellee's Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of March 2019."
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62012) pertaining to the
CompuCredit Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78409) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Amended and
Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92889) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan
of our report dated March 26, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CompuCredit Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

|SIG | 
|--- | 

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 26, 2002

---

QuickLinks
STATE v. David Michael REED

365A16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 20, 2018

E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Paul E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Reed, David Michael.

*209The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 17th of August 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 21st day of September 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00275

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.C. , S.R.C., and E.D.C., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00862

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs of court are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED October 23, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice