60110 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 

and products containing same by reason 

of infringement of claims 1–22 of the 

‘600 patent. The notice of investigation 

named Fortinet, Inc. (‘‘Fortinet’’) of 

Sunnyvale, California as the sole 

respondent. 

On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding a violation of section 

337 based on his findings that claims 4, 

7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent are 

not invalid or unenforceable, and are 

infringed by respondent’s products. The 

ALJ also found that claims 1 and 3 of 

the ‘600 patent are invalid as 

anticipated by prior art and that a 

domestic industry exists. He also issued 

his recommended determination on 

remedy and bonding. 

On July 8, 2005, the Commission 

issued a notice that it had determined 

not to review the ALJ’s final ID on 

violation, thereby finding a violation of 

Section 337. 70 FR 40731 (July 14, 

2005). The Commission also requested 

briefing on the issues of remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. Id. 

Submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding were 

filed on July 18, 2005, by all parties. All 

parties filed response submissions on 

July 25, 2005. On August 8, 2005, the 

Commission terminated the 

investigation, and issued a limited 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order covering respondent’s systems for 

detecting and removing viruses or 

worms, components thereof, and 

products containing same covered by 

claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 

patent. 

On September 13, 2005, complainant 

Trend Micro Inc. filed a complaint for 

enforcement proceedings of the 

Commission’s remedial orders. Trend 

Micro asserts that respondent Fortinet, 

and its distributors, have circumvented 

the cease and desist order by continuing 

to advertise, market, sell and offer for 

sale in the United States the imported 

infringing products and antivirus 

features of Fortinet’s infringing 

software. 

The Commission, having examined 

the complaint seeking a formal 

enforcement proceeding, and having 

found that the complaint complies with 

the requirements for institution of a 

formal enforcement proceeding 

contained in Commission rule 210.75, 

has determined to institute formal 

enforcement proceedings to determine 

whether Fortinet is in violation of the 

Commission’s cease and desist order 

issued in the investigation, and what if 

any enforcement measures are 

appropriate. The following entities are 

named as parties to the formal 

enforcement proceeding: (1) 

Complainant Trend Micro, (2) 

respondent Fortinet, and (3) a 

Commission investigative attorney to be 

designated by the Director, Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

§ 210.75 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.75). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 7, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20572 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Review)] 

Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet 

from Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct a full five-year 

review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on tin- and chromium-coated 

steel sheet from Japan. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on tin- and chromium-coated steel 

sheet from Japan would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the review will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2005, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to a 

full review in the subject five-year 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that 

both the domestic and respondent 

interested party group responses to its 

notice of institution (70 FR 38210, July 

1, 2005) were adequate. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20622 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

October 7, 2005. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following public 

information collection request (ICR) to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–

13,44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this 

ICR, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained by 

calling the Department of Labor. To 

obtain documentation contact Ira Mills 

on 202–693–4122 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or e-mail: Mills.Ira@dol.gov. 

Comments should be sent to Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office 

of Management and Budget, Room 

10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202–

395–7316 (this is not a toll free number), 

within 30 days from the date of this 

publication in the Federal Register. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 60111 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA). 

Type of Review: New Collection. 

Title: Evaluation of State Worker 

Profiling Models. 

OMB Number: 1205–0NEW. 

Frequency: Other; One-time 

Collection. 

Affected Public: State, local, or tribal 

government. 

Type of Response: Mandatory. 

Number of Respondents: 53. 

Annual Responses: 53. 

Average Response Time: 32 hours for 

survey and data collection. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 1696. 

Total Annualized Capital/Startup 

Costs: $58,427. 

Total Annual Costs (operating/ 

maintaining systems or purchasing 

services): $58,427 (one-time collection). 

Description: This project will evaluate 

the predictions of State worker profiling 

models and develop guidance for 

improvement. 

Ira L. Mills, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–20591 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–30–P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[05–148] 

Notice of Information Collection 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration (NASA). 

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to take this opportunity to 

comment on proposed and/or 

continuing information collections, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). NASA will utilize the 

information collected to determine 

whether the Agency’s recruitment 

efforts are reaching all segments of the 

country. 

DATES: Comments on this proposal 

should be received within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: All comments should be 

addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs; Office of Management and 

Budget; Room 10236; New Executive 

Office Building; Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of information collection 

instrument(s) and instructions should 

be directed to Mr. Walter Kit, NASA 

Reports Officer, NASA Headquarters, 

300 E Street, SW., Mail Suite 6M70, 

Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–1350, 

Walter.Kit-1@nasa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

The National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA) is requesting 

renewal of an existing collection that is 

used to ensure NASA collects racial and 

ethnic data information from on-line job 

applicants to determine if NASA’s 

recruitment efforts are reaching all 

segments of the country, as required by 

Federal law. 

II. Method of Collection 

NASA uses electronic methods to 

collect information from collection 

respondents. 

III. Data 

Title: NASA Voluntary On-Line Job 

Applicant Racial and Ethnic Data. 

OMB Number: 2700–0103. 

Type of Review: Renewal. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; Federal government. 

Number of Respondents: 40,000. 

Responses per Respondent: 5 minutes. 

Annual Responses: 40,000. 

Hours per Request: 5 min/request. 

Annual Burden Hours: 3,334. 

Frequency of Report: On occasion. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0. 

Dated: October 6, 2005. 

Patricia L. Dunnington, 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–20561 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Notice of Permits Issued Under the 

Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under 

the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, 

Public Law 95–541. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 

notice of permits issued under the 

Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 

This is the required notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 

Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, 

National Science Foundation, 4201 

Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 15 

and July 27, 2005, the National Science 

Foundation published notices in the 

Federal Register of permit applications 

received. Permits were issued on 

October 5, 2005 to: 

J. Allan Campbell (Permit No. 2006–

017). 

George Steinmetz (Permit No. 2006–

020). 

Nadene G. Kennedy, 

Permit Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–20626 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–M 

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY 

CORPORATION 

Required Interest Rate Assumption for 

Determining Variable-Rate Premium; 

Interest on Late Premium Payments; 

Interest on Underpayments and 

Overpayments of Single-Employer 

Plan Termination Liability and 

Multiemployer Withdrawal Liability; 

Interest Assumptions for 

Multiemployer Plan Valuations 

Following Mass Withdrawal 

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice of interest rates and 

assumptions. 

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public 

of the interest rates and assumptions to 

be used under certain Pension Benefit 

Guaranty Corporation regulations. These 

rates and assumptions are published 

elsewhere (or can be derived from rates 

published elsewhere), but are collected 

and published in this notice for the 

convenience of the public. Interest rates 

are also published on the PBGC’s Web 

site (http://www.pbgc.gov). 

DATES: The required interest rate for 

determining the variable-rate premium