alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Invention; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and is available 
for licensing by the Department of the Navy. U.S. Patent No. 6,280,759: 
Method of Controlled Release and Controlled Release Microstructures, 
and any continuations, divisionals, or re-issues thereof.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the invention cited should be 
directed to the Naval Research Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, and must include the U.S. 
Patent number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane F. Kuhl, Head, Technology 
Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-3083. Due to temporary U.S. Postal 
Service delays, please fax (202) 404-7920, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d564855517d4849524d545c13534f5113535c4b4413505451"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e9f7eaeec2f7f6edf2ebe3acecf0eeacece3f4fbacefebee">[email protected]</span></a> or use courier delivery to expedite response.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.)

    Dated: January 28, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne, Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-2048 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,592
<PP&E>                                      15,840,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,870,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,870,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Alan L. Hoover, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Alan L. Hoover
--------------------------------
Alan L. Hoover, Acting President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       16
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4656 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program 

establishing a child-care center for children of veterans receiving treatment and other individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010 

Mr. BUCHANAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

a pilot program establishing a child-care center for children of veterans receiving treatment and other individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF CHILD-CARE CENTER 

4 PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of ap6 propriations for such purpose, the Secretary shall carry 

7 out a pilot program establishing a child-care center de8 scribed in subsection (b). 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4656 IH

1 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—A child-care center described 

2 in this subsection is a child-care center that— 

3 (1) is made available (to the extent space is 

4 available) to children of— 

5 (A) veterans receiving treatment or other 

6 services at the facility in which the child-care 

7 center is located; 

8 (B) employees of the Department of Vet9 erans Affairs; 

10 (C) employees of a contractor of the De11 partment of Veterans Affairs; 

12 (D) employees of veterans service organiza13 tions; and 

14 (E) members of the Armed Forces on ac15 tive duty whose duty station— 

16 (i) is in the same geographic area as 

17 the child-care center; and 

18 (ii) does not have child-care services 

19 made available to the member by the Sec20 retary of Defense; and 

21 (2) is located at the Bay Pines Medical Center, 

22 Bay Pines, Florida. 

23 (c) CURRENT STANDARDS.—Except as provided in 

24 subsection (b), section 7809 of title 38, United States 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4656 IH

1 Code, shall apply to the child-care center established under 

2 subsection (a). 

3 (d) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

5 to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of 

6 Representatives and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

7 of the Senate a report on the child-care center established 

8 under subsection (a), including— 

9 (1) an assessment of the success of the center; 

10 (2) whether the center improves the access of 

11 veterans to outpatient treatment; 

12 (3) the number of children that— 

13 (A) the center is capable of caring for each 

14 day; and 

15 (B) the center cares for each day on aver16 age; and 

17 (4) any recommendations regarding whether to 

18 expand the pilot program to other locations. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Antonio MEANS

No. 266P18-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Charles Antonio Means, for Means, Charles Antonio

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of October 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th of October 2018 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Johnston County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of October 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. Rudolph COLES, Jr.

No. COA18-357

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

NEW TRIAL.
#### In the Matter of Vinod Kohli, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 381]

Spain, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits.

In September 1996, while employed as a Supervising Labor Service Representative by the Department of Labor, petitioner applied for disability retirement based upon alleged disabling conditions in his lower back and left knee. After the application was denied, petitioner filed another application in April 1997 which added an injury to his cervical spine to the alleged disabling conditions. Upon the denial of the latter application, petitioner requested a hearing and redetermination. Based on expert medical testimony adduced at the hearing, respondent *860denied the application concluding that petitioner had failed to meet his burden of proving that he is incapacitated from performing his duties. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination.

The expert for the State and Local Employees’ Retirement System testified that petitioner voluntarily resisted all range of motion tests and displayed other responses to testing which were exaggerated and inconsistent with the limited objective findings disclosed by MRI and EMG tests and with other subjective symptoms claimed by petitioner. The expert found no atrophy of muscles, loss of reflexes or other objective signs of disability and concluded that petitioner was not disabled from performing his duties. Although petitioner’s expert reached a contrary conclusion, respondent had the exclusive authority to evaluate the conflicting medical evidence and accept the opinion of the Retirement System’s expert over that of petitioner’s expert *(see, e.g., Matter of Mallory v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*261 AD2d 775). Despite petitioner’s challenge to the credibility of the Retirement System’s expert, a review of the record discloses no basis to disturb respondent’s determination *(compare, Matter of De Carolis v McCall,*272 AD2d 824, 825, *with Matter of Principe v McCall,*255 AD2d 853, 855, 856). That petitioner may have been awarded Social Security and workers’ compensation benefits is not binding on respondent *(see, Matter of Knight v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*266 AD2d 774, 776; *Matter of Principe v McCall, supra,*at 855), and there is nothing in the record to support petitioner’s claim that the opinion of the Retirement System’s expert, an orthopedic surgeon, is entitled to less weight than the opinion of petitioner’s neurologist *(cf., Matter of City of Schenectady v McCall,*245 AD2d 708, 710-711).

Peters, J. P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### STATE ex rel. Henry ROTOLO v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2223.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Rotolo, Henry;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 96-4915; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-193.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GreenPoint Credit, LLC



We have examined management's assertion about GreenPoint Credit, LLC's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
                                 --------------------------------------
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included
----------------
in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
GreenPoint Credit, LLC's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about GreenPoint Credit, LLC's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on GreenPoint Credit LLC's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that GreenPoint Credit, LLC complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all materials respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

January 18, 2000
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427  I, Haley Manchester, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trai Thien USA Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  c) disclosed in this report any change in registrant's internal control over financial reporting the occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting,    Dated: August 27, 2010/s/ Haley ManchesterHaley Manchester
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 4.1





                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF

                             THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                OCTOBER 4, 1991




          [SEAL]                                             [SEAL]

          NUMBER                                             SHARES




                          CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION


INFORMATION REGARDING THE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND PRIVILEGES APPLICABLE TO THE
   SHARES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREON


THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT _________________________________________________ is the

registered holder of ____________________________________________________ Shares


 of the Common Stock of   CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION


transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be

signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto

affixed this ___________ day of __________________, A.D. 20_______.


___________________________________     _____________________________________

         Secretary                               Chairman of the Board


                         SHARES      $0.01       EACH


(C) GOES 71
All Rights Reserved

<PAGE>





                                 CERTIFICATE

                                     FOR



                                    SHARES


                                    OF THE
                                 COMMON STOCK






                                  ISSUED TO

                              ------------------
                                    DATED

                              ------------------



For Value Received, __________ hereby sell, assign and transfer

unto ____________________________________________________Shares

         of the Common Stock represented by the within

  Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

______________________________________________________, Attorney


to transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named

Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

    Dated ____________, 20___

       In presence of

-----------------------------        --------------------------------


     NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
 MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
 ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
FINAN, et al. v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICE

7P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 7, 2019

Melinda Finan, for Finan, Melinda

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of January 2019 by Plaintiff for Change of Venue:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of January 2019."