alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jack D. Massimino                                      
|Jack D. Massimino Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Thursday, October 6, 2005.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary                                   ( print page 58242)                                of Labor*                         v.                         *Elk Run Coal Company, Inc.,*                         Docket No. WEVA 2003-149. (Issues include whether the judge applied the proper legal standard in determining whether a violation 30 CFR 75.220(a)(1) (failure to comply with a roof control plan) was significant and substantial.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs, subject4 to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 05-20090  Filed 10-3-05; 12:16 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce T. Leitch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/
      Bruce T. Leitch
| | ------ | -------------------------
| |        |                          
| | Name:  | BRUCE T. LEITCH          
| |        |                          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer  
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  
| |        |                          
| | Date:  | November 17, 2004        

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
---

EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A)/15d-14(A) OF THE 
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, Jim Fischbach, Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Global
  Imaging 3D Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Intrepid
  Global Imaging 3D Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
  during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) Evaluated
  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
  "Evaluation Date"); and c) Presented in this annual report my conclusions about
  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
  as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
  registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
  (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies
  in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect
  the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
  data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
  in internal controls; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
  internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there
  were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
  significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
  evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
  and material weaknesses.

April 12, 2007

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Anju
      Tandon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      TNT
      Designs, Inc.. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      and
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of TNT Designs,
      Inc.





Date:
      August 16, 2006




*/s/
                Anju
                Tandon*
              *Anju
                Tandon*
              *President,
                Chief Executive*
              *and
                Financial Officer*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                  SUBSIDIARIES OF AAi.FOSTERGRANT, INC. ("AAI")


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                    Jurisdiction of Organization      Shareholder
------------------                    ----------------------------      -----------
<S>                                   <C>                               <C>
Foster Grant Holdings, Inc.
 ("Holdings")                                      Delaware                Common - AAi
                                                                           Preferred - Bolle, Inc.

The Bonneau Company                                  Texas                 Holdings

Bonneau General, Inc.                              Delaware                The Bonneau Company

Bonneau Holdings, Inc.                             Delaware                The Bonneau Company

F.G.G. Investments, Inc.                           Delaware                The Bonneau Company

O-Ray Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware                Holdings

Foster Grant Group, L.P.                           Delaware                1% G.P. - Bonneau General Inc.
                                                                           64% L.P. - Bonneau Holdings, Inc.
                                                                           35% L.P. - O-Ray Holdings, Inc.

Fantasma, LLC                                      Delaware                AAi

Aai.FosterGrant of Canada Co.                   Nova Scotia                AAi
                                                     Canada

Vendome Accessories Limited                     Nova Scotia                51% - Aai.FosterGrant of Canada Co.
                                                     Canada                49% - Place Vendome Accessories, Inc.

AAi.Foster Grant Limited                     United Kingdom                AAi

AAi/JOSKE'S, S. de R.L. de C.V.                      Mexico                75% - AAi
                                                                           25% - Joske's de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
</TABLE>



#246831v3
STATE v. Curtis L. TYSON

198P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Curtis L. Tyson, for Tyson, Curtis L.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of June 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    /s/ Joseph M. FortunatoName:
    
    Joseph M. FortunatoTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
    
    August 10, 2010
 /s/ Michael M. NuzzoName:
    
    Michael M. NuzzoTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)Date:
    
    August 10, 2010
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
DARLENE M. BROUGHTON , Petitioner

,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent

.

______________________

2014

- 3063

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0752

- 13

- 0101 -I- 1.

______________________
ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R
Darlene M. Broughton moves for additional time. The court notes that no fu r ther submissions are due and thus there are no deadlines to be extended

. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 14-3063 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2014BROUGHTON v. MSPB 2

The motion is denied. All future motions will be deferr ed to the merits panel because the case is ready for the calendar

. F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21 Case: 14-3063 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2014
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000381

09-MAY-2019

09:34 AM
#### In re BOWFIN M/V Western Pioneer, Inc., as owner of the M/V Bowfin for limitation of liability, Petitioner-Appellee, v. International Specialty, Inc., as authorized agents for Sentry Select Insurance Company and Lloyds of London Syndicates 588,861,1209, Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Company, Continental Insurance Company, and Greenwich Insurance Company; Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co.; Continental Insurance Company; Greenwich Insurance Co., Claimants-Appellants, *1138and Signature Seafoods, Inc., owner of the Lucky Buck, Claimant.

No. 02-35534.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2003.

Filed Aug. 13, 2003.

Stanley L. Gibson, Gibson Robb & Lindh, San Francisco, CA, for claimant-appellant Signature Seafoods, Inc.

Matthew Turetsky, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Seattle, WA, for claimant-appellant International Specialty, Inc.

Donald K. McLean, Bauer Moynihan *&*Johnson, Seattle, WA, for the petitioner-appellee.

Before: REAVLEY,* TASHIMA, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This admiralty action arises out of the collision in the Puget Sound between the Bowfin, owned by Western Pioneer, and the barge Lucky Buck, owned by Claimant Signature Seafoods. Western Pioneer initiated this Limitation of Liability Act1 proceeding following the collision. The district court held that Western Pioneer was entitled to limit its liability under the Act. We affirm.

The Limitation of Liability Act limits shipowner liability arising from the unseaworthiness of the shipowner’s vessel or the negligence of the vessel’s crew unless the condition of unseaworthiness or the act of negligence was within the shipowner’s “privity or knowledge.”2 The shipowner has the burden of proving that the act or condition was outside its privity or knowledge after the claimant first establishes what act or condition caused the loss.3 In this case, the district court found that the sole proximate cause of the collision was “spontaneous negligent navigational errors” of the master of the tug and not the master’s fatigue (for which the Claimants urged Western Pioneer was responsible). That finding is not clearly erroneous.4

We reject the Claimants’ contention that, by admitting that its master was at fault, Western Pioneer assumed the burden of negating its privity or knowledge of other acts by its master. The claimant retains the burden of proving what act caused the loss even if the shipowner concedes that its crew was negligent.5 The district court’s finding resolved the limitation issues.

AFFIRMED.

1

. 46 U.S.C. app. §§ 181-196 (Supp.2003).

2

. *Id.*§ 183(a).

3

. *See Carr v. PMS Fishing Corp.,*191 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1999); *Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida,*768 F.2d 1558, 1563 (11th Cir.1985); *In re Brasea, Inc.,*583 F.2d 736, 738 (5th Cir.1978).

4

. *See Churchill v. F/V Fjord,*892 F.2d 763, 770 (9th Cir.1988).

5

. *See Carr,*191 F.3d at 4.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY C. ROTE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT 

AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL 

CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED 

STATES; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35017 

D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01988-MO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 18, 2021**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. 

Timothy C. Rote appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action alleging federal and state law 

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35017 

dismissal based on res judicata. Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th 

Cir. 2002). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 

The District Court for the District of Columbia did not abuse its discretion in 

transferring this action to the District of Oregon. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) 

(providing for transfer to a district where an action might have been brought); 

Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 211 F.3d 495, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting 

forth factors for transfer of venue and standard of review). 

The district court dismissed this action as precluded by the prior judgment 

entered in District Court Case No. 3:19-cv-00082-MO. However, this prior 

judgment has been vacated by our contemporaneous disposition in appeal No. 19-

35847 and therefore no longer has preclusive effect on this action. See Cal. Dep’t 

of Soc. Servs. v. Thompson, 321 F.3d 835, 847 (9th Cir. 2003) (once a decision of 

the district court is reversed or dismissed, the judgment cannot serve as the basis 

for a disposition on the grounds of res judicata or collateral estoppel). We vacate

the district court’s judgment dismissing this action and remand for further 

proceedings. On remand the district court will address Rote’s motion for 

disqualification. 

The district court imposed pre-filing requirements on Rote but the requisite 

process for such an order was not followed. See Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of 

Los Angeles, 761 F.3d 1057, 1061-67 (9th Cir. 2014) (standard of review; 
3 20-35017 

discussing procedural and substantive standards for a federal pre-filing order). We 

vacate the pre-filing order without prejudice to reimposing it using the requisite 

process.

The motions for disqualification (Docket Entry No. 53) and to supplement 

the record on appeal (Docket Entry No. 54) are denied. 

Each party will bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED.
ZLOOP, INC. v. PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Alba-Justina Secrist a/k/a AJ Secrist and R. Douglas Harmon

No. 122PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 1, 2018

Gavin J. Reardon, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Amiel J. Rossabi, Attorney at Law, for Zloop, INC.

Robert W. Fuller, Attorney at Law, Stuart L. Pratt, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP, et al.

*ORDER*

On 20 September 2018, this Court allowed Plaintiff's petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Business Court. The record on appeal in this matter shall be due no later than fifteen (15) days from the filing date of this Order. The Appellant's brief shall be due thirty (30) days from the filing of the record in accordance with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

*637By the order of the Court in Conference, this the *1st* day of October, 2018.
Exhibit 15.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Board of Directors


Infosys Limited:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-32196) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-160036) on Form F-3 of Infosys Limited of our reports dated May 3, 2012 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Infosys Limited and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended March 31, 2012 and the related financial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, which reports appear in the March 31, 2012 annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Limited.







KPMG


Bangalore, India





May 3, 2012
STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Robert REYNOLDS

No. 155P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, Joe Robert Reynolds, for Reynolds, Joe Robert.

William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Surry County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Carbon Graphite Group. Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenfang Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May, 16, 2011
 
 /s/Zhenfang Yang
 Zhenfang Yang
 Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene MOORE.

No. 2003-KH-2241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Moore, Eugene;—Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 20895-02; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 03-00340.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the district court for its consideration. The district court is directed to provide this Court with a copy of its ruling.