alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,023
<SECURITIES>                                    37,055
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                       696
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,138
<PP&E>                                           5,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           390
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,110
<SALES>                                         25,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,144
<CGS>                                            6,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,488)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,018)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.41)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY DWC GP, Inc.
    
    DelawareDallas Woodcraft Company, LP
    
    Delaware (Limited Partnership)Domistyle, Inc.
    
    TexasEM Boehm, Inc.
    
    DelawareGIA, Inc.
    
    NebraskaHIG Investments, Inc.
    
    DelawareHomco, Inc.
    
    TexasHome Interiors de Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    DelawareLaredo Candle Company, L.P.
    
    Texas (Limited Partnership)Spring Valley Scents, Inc.
    
    DelawareHI Ceramics, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoHI Glass, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoHI Metals, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoHI Trading Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoHome Interiors de Mexico, S.A. de R.L.
De C.V.
    
    MexicoHome Interiors Services de Mexico,
S. de C.V.
    

MexicoHome Interiors & Gifts of Canada, Inc.
    
    Canada
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Mark Joseph Corrao, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
      Mark Joseph Corrao*


*Mark
      Joseph Corrao*


*Chief
      Financial Officer*




*May21,
      2007*
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Entercom Communications Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   February 9, 2011 |                                    |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                          |                                    |
| By:                           | /s/   David J. Field                    |   |
| Name:                         | David   J. Field                        |   |
| Title:                        | President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          | (principal   executive officer)         |   |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Entercom Communications Corp. and will be retained by Entercom Communications Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6502** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RAYMOND GARFIELD BUTLER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00442

- JFM

- 4; 1:13

- cv - 03804

- JFM )

Submitted : September 12, 2014 Decided: September 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Raymond Garfield Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raym ond Garfield Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issu es a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies rel ief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v . Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a c onstitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Butler’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
----

European Maritime Safety Agency — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2005

(2006/C 266/05)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

www.emsa.eu.int

Source: Agency data — These tables summarise the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts.

Table 1

Implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005

Table 2

Revenue and expenditure account for the financial year 2005 (1)

Table 3

Balance sheet at 31 December 2005 and 31 December 2004 (2)

----

(1)  The data for the financial year 2004 have not been presented since they are not comparable with the 2005 data because of the change in the accounting methods applied.

(2)  The data for the financial year 2004 have been restated to make them comparable with the 2005 data.

----
EXHIBIT 23.2



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mission West Properties, Inc.
Cupertino, California

We  hereby  consent  to this  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our reports  dated  January 28,  2005,  relating to the
consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of Mission West Properties,
Inc's internal  control over financial  reporting,  and schedule of Mission West
Properties,  Inc.  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004.


\S\ BDO Seidman, LLP


San Francisco, California
March 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4768

  To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve System from 
 being made available to corporations that finance political campaigns 
            or political propaganda, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2010

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve System from 
 being made available to corporations that finance political campaigns 
            or political propaganda, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bailouts Are Not For Sale Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISCOUNT WINDOW 
              FOR CORPORATIONS WHICH INTERFERE IN ELECTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 13 of the Federal Reserve 
Act, any other provision of the Federal Reserve Act, or any other 
provision of law, a corporation which has made any independent 
expenditure or any disbursement for an electioneering communication, in 
connection with an election campaign for a Federal office, directly or 
through any affiliate, after the date of the enactment of such Act may 
not have any notes discounted by any Federal reserve bank and may not 
otherwise have access to or receive the benefit of, directly or 
indirectly through any affiliate or third party, any financing provided 
by or through the Board or any Federal reserve bank or any credit 
facility established by the Board or any Federal reserve bank.
    (b) Prompt Reimbursement During Transition.--If any corporation 
subject to subsection (a) has, before the date of the enactment of this 
Act, entered into any transaction or financing arrangement prohibited 
by such subsection, the Board shall require the corporation to unwind 
the transaction and repay any amount outstanding as soon as practicable 
but, in any case, before the end of the 90-day period beginning on such 
date of enactment.
    (c) Regulations.--Before the end of the 90-day period beginning on 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Board shall prescribe, in 
final form, such regulations as may be appropriate to implement this 
Act.
    (d) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``Board'' 
and ``affiliate'' have the same meanings as in section 2 of the Bank 
Holding Company Act of 1956.
    (e) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act, without regard to the effective date of any 
regulation prescribed under subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
Kathleen BOURQUE, Ann Bourque and Peter Bourque, Plaintiffs, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE, NC, Bishop Peter J. Jugis and John Brian Kaup, Defendants.

No. COA17-1054

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.6

                   ADDENDUM NO. 7 OF CONTRACT NO. 78-AM-L1102

                             DATE: DECEMBER 21, 1998

         WHEREAS, the Seller and the Buyer (the "Parties") have been unable to
agree on the current market price for purposes of determining the Base Price for
the Year 1998, as contemplated by Sections 5.1 and 5.4 of the Contract, and

         WHEREAS, in lieu of referring the price issue to arbitration in
accordance with Section 5.1 of the Contract, the Parties have agreed to adopt
the 1997 Base Price as the 1998 Base Price without regard to the current market
price and to reduce by 180,000 Metric Tons the minimum quantity that the Buyer
is required to purchase at that price,

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

         1.       The Base Price for the year 1998 shall be USD38.05 per Metric
                  Ton FOBT, and the minimum quantity for the Year 1998 shall be
                  810,000 Metric Tons, instead of the 990,000 Metric Tons
                  otherwise provided in Sections 3.1 and 3.2.

         2.       Any delivery tonnage over 810,000 Metric Tons scheduled to be
                  lifted before the end of 1998 is deemed as pre-lifted quantity
                  of 1999 and will be lifted at the 1999 provisional Base Price
                  subject to retroactive adjustment.

         3.       All other terms and conditions of the Contract and Addenda
                  Nos. 1 through 6 remain unaltered.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this ADDENDUM on the date
indicated by their duly authorized representatives.

SELLER:                                     BUYER:

PEN COAL CORPORATION                        TAIWAN POWER COMPANY

By:    /s/ William E. Beckner               By:    /s/ Gan-Charng Lee
       -------------------------------             -----------------------------
Name:  William E. Beckner                   Name:  Gan-Charng Lee
Title: President                            Title: Vice President
# Official Journal C 52A/11 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 52A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5911 February 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 52A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5911 February 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2016/C 052A/1 | Vacancy notice No CDR/AD14/6BIS/2016 concerning a post of Director (M/F) at the Directorate for Communication — Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations — Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2016/C 052A/1

Vacancy notice No CDR/AD14/6BIS/2016 concerning a post of Director (M/F) at the Directorate for Communication — Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations — Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations

Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations

Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Lorenzo D. MILLS

No. COA17-1350

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

 

TO THE

 

HALCÓN RESOURCES CORPORATION

 

FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED 2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Halcón Resources Corporation First Amended and Restated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of Halcón Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on February 27, 2013, subject to approval by the Stockholders of the Company, which was obtained on May 23, 2013. Accordingly, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 23, 2013, as follows:

 

1.                                      The first sentence of Section 1.3 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Subject to the limitations set forth herein, Awards may be made under this Plan for a total of 41,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”).”

 

2.                                      Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“(a) Subject to Article XII, (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock made subject to the grant of Options and/or SARs to any Eligible Employee in any calendar year may not exceed 3,400,000 and (ii) the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan through Incentive Stock Options is 41,500,000.”

 

In all other respects, the Plan remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan has been executed to be effective as of May 23, 2013.

 

	
 
    	
HALCÓN RESOURCES CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Floyd C. Wilson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Floyd C. Wilson, Chairman of the Board and
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4904 

To prohibit the use of funds for implementation or enforcement of any 

Federal mandate to purchase health insurance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2010 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for implementation or enforcement of any Federal mandate to purchase health insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLE4 MENT OR ENFORCE FEDERAL MANDATE TO 

5 PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE. 

6 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

7 available to any Federal department or agency may be 

8 used to implement or enforce any Federal mandate to pur9 chase health insurance. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Burr D.
      Northrop, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





ENTECH
      ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By
/s/
      Burr D.
      Northrop


Burr
      D.
      Northrop


Principal
      Financial Officer


January
      14, 2008
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00306 - CV IN RE DEREK MONTEZ, RELATOR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

August 19, 2014 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before this court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Derek Montez . He requests that we direct the P otter County District Clerk to provide him with a copy of an order revoking his probation in Cause No. 42,803 - A so that he may use it in filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2007 conviction and punishment in Cause No. 18 , 139 - C . We de ny the petition. An intermediate appellate court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against a district clerk only when necessary to enforce its jurisdiction over a pending appeal. In re Washington , 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.
— Houston [1 st Dist. ] 1999, orig. proceeding). Montez does not allege that he has an appeal pending in this court or that our directing the district clerk to provide him with a copy of the document in2

question would be for the purpose of enforc ing our jurisdiction over any a ppeal pending before us. Thus, we have no jurisdiction over his request. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 23.1












Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









Board of Directors and Stockholders


Mission West Properties, Inc.


Cupertino, California




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC Nos. 333-133335 and 333-52835-99, and Form S-8, SEC File Nos. 333-80369 and 333-123466 of Mission West Properties, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Mission West Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 16, 2010 relating to the financial statement schedule which appears in this Form 10-K.









\S\ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.







San Francisco, California


March 16, 2010