alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (ACSBE) (#1171).                

*Date and Time:*                     November 3, 2005 8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 4, 2005 8 a.m.-12:30 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, Stafford II Building, Suite 555, Arlington, VA 22230.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Mr. Tyrone Jordan Office of the Assistant Director, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 905, Arlington, VA 22230, 703-292-8741.                

*Summary Minutes:*                     May be obtained from contact person listed above.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate programs and activities.                

*Agenda:*                     Discussion on issues, role and future direction of the Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.                

Dated: October 13, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20863  Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10198 and # 10199] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida, effective 9/30/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Katrina.                     

*Incident Period:*                         8/25/2005.                     

*Effective Date:*                         9/30/2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/29/2005.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         6/14/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of Florida, dated 09/14/2005, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster. 

Primary Counties: Broward, Miami-Dade. 

Contiguous Counties: 

Florida: Hendry, Palm Beach. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: September 30, 2005. 

Hector V. Barreto, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 05-20642 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Excellency Investment Realty
Trust, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, David Mladen, President and Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ David Mladen
   ------------------------------------------
        David Mladen
        President and Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer)
        Dated this 14th day of August, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to SWORD Diagnostics, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license, to practice in the fields of rapid detection                               ( print page 5618)                            of pathogens for food safety; drinking water and process water; and human and veterinary diagnostic markets in the United States and certain foreign countries, the Government-owned invention described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/601,180: Scanned Wavelength Spectroscopic Detector (SWSD) for Identifying Biological Cells and Organisms, Navy Case No. 96,640.                     

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than February 18, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Jane Kuhl, Head, Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-3083. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax (202) 404-7920, e-Mail:                         *kuhl@utopia.nrl.navy.mil*                         or use courier delivery to expedite response.                     

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.) 

Dated: January 28, 2005. 

I.C. Le Moyne Jr., 

Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-2047 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Now Auto Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Scott Miller, Chief Executive Officer/ Financial Officer and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, certify in my capacities as officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.





/s/ Scott MillerScott
      MillerChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      16, 2009/s/ Faith ForbisFaith
      ForbisChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      16, 2009
STATE v. Carnell L. CALHOUN

54P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Carnell Calhoun, for Calhoun, Carnell Lavance

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Raleigh, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of February 2018 by Defendant for Writ to Compel Production of Court File Records:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Jackson and Ervin, J. recused
#### Kevin L. PRESBERRY, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 81691.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 30, 2003.

Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen K. Kramer, Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin L. Presberry (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

*224Movant pleaded guilty to one count of robbery in the second degree, in violation of Section 569.030 RSMo 1994. The trial court imposed a suspended imposition of sentence with five years probation. Later, Movant’s probation was revoked and the trial court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. Movant thereafter filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035, alleging that his plea counsel failed to advise him of the maximum sentence range if his probation was subsequently revoked, and failed to investigate a witness. This appeal follows the denial of Movant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be meritless. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
##### 



Pharma
Services Intermediate Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John D. RatliffJohn D. RatliffExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 12, 2005Date
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 3, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00380

- CV

Patricia A. Grant, Ph.D. , Appellant

v.

Richard W. Heo, et al. , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE B YRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed the r ecord, it

appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court dismisses the

appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indi gent and unable to pay costs , no

adjudications of costs is made

.
#### BEACH AND ADAMS BUILDERS, INC. v. VERNON S. FELTON and wife, MARIAN S. FELTON; WATAUGA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION; and C. BANKS FINGER, TRUSTEE for WATAUGA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION

No. 7524SC546

(Filed 5 November 1975)

Rules of Civil Procedure § 54 — .judgment adjudicating rights of fewer than all parties — premature appeal

Summary judgment dismissing the action as to two defendants adjudicated the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, contained no determination by the trial judge that there was no just reason for delay, and therefore was not a final judgment and not appealable. G.S. 1-1, Rule 54(b).

Appeal by plaintiff from *Martin, Judge.*Judgment entered 13 March 1975 in Superior Court, Watauga County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 16 October 1975.

In this action plaintiff seeks (1) to recover judgment against defendants Felton and wife in the amount of $21,989,.78 as balance due by contract under which plaintiff built a residence for the Feltons and (2) to have plaintiff’s claim of lien against the Felton’s property declared superior to a recorded deed of trust executed by the Feltons to defendant Finger as trustee for Watauga Savings and Loan Association. Defendants Watauga Savings and Loan Association and Finger, trustee, moved for summary judgment dismissing this action as to them. The court allowed the motion and plaintiff appealed.

*Charlie R. Brown for plaintiff appellant.*

*C. Bcmks Finger and Donald M. Watson, Jr. for defendant appellees.*

PARKER, Judge.

The summary judgment from which plaintiff attempts to appeal does not adjudicate the rights and liabilities of all the parties. It contains no determination by the trial judge that “there is no just reason for delay.” Therefore, this is not a final judgment and is not presently “subject to review either by appeal or otherwise.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54 (b) ; *Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.,*25 N.C. App. 18, 212 S.E. 2d 41 (1975), *cert.*
      *335
      *denied,*288 N.C. 241 (1975) ; *Arnold v. Howard,*24 N.C. App. 255, 210 S.E. 2d 492 (1974).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Morris and Martin concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       JONES INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS, LTD.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

    All of the companies listed below are Colorado corporations, unless
otherwise indicated.

BP Programming, Inc.

Great American Country, Inc.

JPN, Inc.

Jones Audio Services, Inc.

Jones/Capstar Radio Programming LLC

Jones Direct, Ltd.

Jones Earth Segment, Inc.

Jones Galactic Radio, Inc.

Jones Galactic Radio Partners, Inc.

Jones Infomercial Networks, Inc.

Jones Infomercial Network Ventures, Inc.

Jones Infomercials International, Ltd.

Jones MAI Radio, Inc.

Jones/Owens Radio Programming LLC

Jones Radio Holdings, Inc.

Jones Radio Network, Inc.

Jones Radio Network Ventures, Inc.

Jones Space Holdings, Inc.

MediaAmerica, Inc., a New York corporation

Product Information Network Venture, a Colorado joint venture
_____________ No. 96-1841SD

_____________ James H. Big Boy, for Edward * V. Big Boy, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED] of Social Security * Administration, * *

Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: November 22, 1996 Filed: November 27, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. James H. Big Boy appeals the distric t court's dismissal of Big Boy's action for judicial review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review of the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40479

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE MARTINEZ-GASCA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1796-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Martinez-Gasca pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after

deportation and was sentenced to 45 months of imprisonment and

three years of supervised release. Martinez-Gasca argues that

the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the

collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release

and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for

review. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-
No. 05-40479

-2-

02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No.

05-8662).

Martinez-Gasca’s constitutional challenge to the

“felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b) is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Martinez-Gasca contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). MartinezGasca properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light

of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here

to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
STATE v. Sydney Shakur MERCER

257P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2018

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Daniel K. Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Sydney Shakur Mercer, for Mercer, Sydney Shakur.

Daniel O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2018 by State of NC to File Petition for Writ of Supersedeas and Application for Temporary Stay with Corrected Certificate of Service:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2018."
#### THEODORE L. MODICA and wife, JEANETTE M. MODICA v. JESSE RODGERS

No. 752DC566

(Filed 5 November 1975)

Appeal and Error § 26— exception to signing of judgment — face of record reviewed

An exception to “the signing and entry of judgment and findings of fact” presents only the face of the record for review.

*333Appeal by plaintiffs from *Manning, Judge.*Judgment entered 7 March 1975 in District Court, Martin County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 20 October 1975.

This is a civil action wherein the plaintiffs, Theodore L. Módica, and wife, Jeanette M. Módica, allege that defendant, Jesse Rodgers, owes them $800.00 on a modification of defendant’s contract to build plaintiffs’ residence.

Defendant filed answer denying the material allegations of the complaint and alleged a counterclaim seeking to recover $2,549.00 from plaintiffs. After a trial without a jury, the judge made detailed findings of fact and concluded that defendant was indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $391.76 and that plaintiffs were indebted to defendant in the sum of $391.76. From a judgment that plaintiffs recover nothing of defendant on their claim and that defendant recover nothing of plaintiffs on his counterclaim, plaintiffs appealed.

*Milton E. Moore for plaintiff appellants.*

*Griffin & Martin by Clarence W. Griffin for defendant appellee.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiffs excepted to “the signing and entry of judgment and findings of fact.” This exception is broadside and does not bring up for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings but presents only the face of the record for review, which includes whether the facts found or admitted support the judgment and whether the judgment is proper in form. *Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity Co.,*283 N.C. 234, 195 S.E. 2d 529 (1973). Accordingly, we have carefully examined the face of the record and conclude the findings of fact support the judgment entered, and the judgment is proper in form.

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Clark concur.
#### Laura A. TOALSON, Respondent, v. Ronald W. TOALSON, Appellant.

No. ED 81882.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

June 30, 2003.

William C. Mcllroy, Vandalia, MO, for appellant.

Robert V. Krueger, Mexico, MO, for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Ronald W. Toalson appeals the judgment dissolving his marriage to Laura A. Toalson. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).