alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CFO OF MORTGAGEIT, INC. PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MortgageITHoldings, Inc. (the "Company") for thequarterly period ended September  30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Donald Epstein, as Chief FinancialOfficer of MortgageIT, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

|                          |  |                          |  |                                               |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------|--|--------------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                     |  | By:                      |  |     /s/DONALD EPSTEIN     |
|      |  |      |  | DonaldEpstein                                 |
|      |  |      |  | ChiefFinancial Officer—MortgageIT, Inc. |
|      |  |      |  | November 15,2004                              |
|                          |

This certification accompanies theReport pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Omeros Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



Dated: November 4, 2010/s/ Gregory A. DemopulosGregory A. Demopulos, M.D.Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of StoneMor GP LLC, the general partner of
StoneMor Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     |  |  |  |                   
|---------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------
|/s/ William R. Shane                                 |  |  |  |                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | Date: May 10, 2011
|(Principal Financial Officer)                        |  |  |  |                   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



50
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

EX REL BEVERLY BRYANT FOREIGN 

ESTATE INTER VIVOS NON RESIDENT 

ALIEN FOREIGN NEUTRAL IN PROPRIA 

PERSONA SUI JURIS IN VIVUS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 114 EM 2016 

 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2016, the “Original Matters Jurisdiction 

Petition” and the “Leave to File Motion Order Grant Extraordinary Relief King’s Bench” 

are DENIED
TAYLOR v. WAKE COUNTY

93P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, Donna M. Taylor, Attorneys at Law, for Taylor, LaTonya A.

Roger A. Askew, Senior Deputy County Attorney, Jennifer M. Jones, Senior Assistant County Attorney, for Wake County, d/b/a the Division of Social Services.

*647The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of November 2018 by Plaintiff for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
DTH MEDIA CORPORATION, et al. v. FOLT, et al.

142PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Hugh Stevens, Attorney at Law, Michael J. Tadych, Attorney at Law, for DTH Media Corporation, et al.

Stephanie A. Brennan, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Folt, Carol L., et al.

Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Victim Rights Organizations.

Jonathan D. Jones, Attorney at Law, for Student Press Law Center, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of January 2019 by Student Press Law Center and Brechner Center for Freedom of Information for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
#### STATE ex rel. Walter COLEMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2001-KH-0106.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Walter Coleman, applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s order dated January 26, 2003; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Division “G”, No. 295-548.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
Opinion filed December 2, 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00 214

- C V

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.R.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A

- 125,918

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant states that the

parties have come to an agreement and that he no longer desires to pursue the appeal. The

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

December 2, 2010

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3



                                                                  [INFOSYS LOGO]



                          INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
                                Registered Office

           ELECTRONICS CITY, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 561 229, INDIA.

                                   PROXY FORM

Regd. Folio No. _________________

I/We_____________________________________of__________________ in the district of
__________________________________________being a member /members of the Company
hereby appoint_________________________of_______________________________________
in the district of____________________or failing him/her________________________
of____________________________________in the district___________________________
as my/our proxy to vote for me/us on my/our behalf at the TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING of the Company to be held at J. N. Tata Auditorium, National
Science Seminar Complex, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012 at
3.00 p.m. on Saturday, June 08, 2002 and at any adjournment(s) thereof.

Signed this________________________day of__________________________________2002.

                                      Rupee
                                       one
                                    Revenue
                                      Stamp

Signature
         ----------------------------------------

Notes: This form, in order to be effective, should be duly stamped, completed
and signed and must be deposited at the Registered Office of the Company, not
less than 48 hours before the meeting.

                                Please tear here

                                                                  [INFOSYS LOGO]


                          INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
                                Registered Office

            ELECTRONICS CITY, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 561 229, INDIA

                                 ATTENDANCE SLIP

               Twenty-first Annual General Meeting - June 08, 2002

Regd. Folio No.___________________       No. of shares held_____________________

I certify that I am a member/proxy for the member of the Company.

I hereby record my presence at the TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the
Company at the J. N. Tata Auditorium, National Science Seminar Complex, Indian
Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012 at 3.00 p.m. on Saturday, June 08,
2002.


---------------------------                           --------------------------
Member's / proxy's name in                            Signature of member/proxy


BLOCK letters

Note:  Please fill up this attendance slip and hand it over at the entrance of
       the meeting hall.

       Members are requested to bring their copies of the Annual Report to the
       meeting.
No. 17,628.

#### Frank M. Iacino, et al. *v.*Paul E. Schneider and The Industrial Commission of Colorado.

(282 P. [2d] 1094)

Decided April 25, 1955.

Mr. Glen L. Daly, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank A. Wachqb, Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Peter L. Dye, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant in error The Industrial Commission of Colorado.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leon HARRIS.

No. 2003-KH-2450.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Harris, Leon; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 02-3332; to the *650Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-KH-771.

Denied.
March 14, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARCUS HILES, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00088-CV V.

ARNIE & COMPANY, P.C., Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Arnie & 

Company, P.C., signed, October 7, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Marcus Hiles, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

   We present below the deficiency of our earnings to fixed charges on a
historical basis for the years ended December 31, 1997 through 2001. For
purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges: (1) earnings
consist of pretax interest (including capitalized interest) on all
indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, and that portion of
rental expense that we believe to be representative of interest.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Year Ended December 31, (unaudited)
                                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                                  1997     1998      1999      2000      2001
                                                 -------  -------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                              <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>
Loss before extraordinary item.................. $(7,821) $(8,970) $(34,713) $(80,436) $(18,454)
                                                 -------  -------  --------  --------  --------
Fixed Charges:
Amortization of debt discount and premium on all
  indebtedness..................................      --       --        --       589       534
Interest expense................................      --       --       494     5,487     5,604
Rental costs....................................     121      152       453       772       870
                                                 -------  -------  --------  --------  --------
Total Fixed Charges.............................     121      152       947     6,848     7,008
                                                 -------  -------  --------  --------  --------
Loss--as adjusted............................... $(7,700) $(8,818) $(33,766) $(73,588) $(11,446)
                                                 =======  =======  ========  ========  ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............   (A)      (B)       (C)       (D)       (E)
</TABLE>
--------
(A) Due to Dice's losses in 1997, the ratio coverage is less than 1:1. Dice
    must generate additional earnings of $7,821 to achieve a coverage ratio of
    1:1.
(B) Due to Dice's losses in 1998, the ratio coverage is less than 1:1. Dice
    must generate additional earnings of $8,970 to achieve a coverage ratio of
    1:1.
(C) Due to Dice's losses in 1999, the ratio coverage is less than 1:1. Dice
    must generate additional earnings of $34,713 to achieve a coverage ratio of
    1:1.
(D) Due to Dice's losses in 2000, the ratio coverage is less than 1:1. Dice
    must generate additional earnings of $80,436 to achieve a coverage ratio of
    1:1.
(E) Due to Dice's losses in 2001 the ratio coverage is less than 1:1. Dice must
    generate additional earnings of $18,454 to achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4575 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land to operate a 

visitor center for Joshua Tree National Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2014 

Mr. COOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land 

to operate a visitor center for Joshua Tree National 

Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VISITOR CENTER FOR JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL 

4 PARK. 

5 The California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (16 

6 U.S.C. 410aaa et seq.) is amended by inserting after sec7 tion 407 the following: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 408. VISITOR CENTER. 

9 ‘‘The Secretary is authorized to acquire not more 

10 than five acres of land and interests in land, and improveVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:38 May 07, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4575.IH H4575

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4575 IH

1 ments thereon, outside the boundaries of Joshua Tree Na2 tional Park, in the unincorporated village of Joshua Tree, 

3 for the purpose of operating a visitor center. The Sec4 retary shall modify the boundary of the park to include 

5 the land acquired under this section as a noncontiguous 

6 parcel. Lands and facilities acquired under this section— 

7 ‘‘(1) may include the property currently owned 

8 by the Joshua Tree National Park Association and 

9 commonly referred to as the ‘Joshua Tree National 

10 Park Visitor Center’; 

11 ‘‘(2) shall be administered by the Secretary as 

12 part of Joshua Tree National Park; and 

13 ‘‘(3) may be acquired only with the consent of 

14 the owner, by donation, purchase with donated or 

15 appropriated funds, or exchange.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
13.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, S.
Gopalakrishnan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2010, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Infosys Technologies
Limited.






Date: April 30,
2010


/s/ S.
GOPALAKRISHNAN




S. Gopalakrishnan


Chief
Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Michael LOTT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2192.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Lott, Michael;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 97-229; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No(s). 02-KH-616, 02-KH-534.

Denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Luis Antonio GOMEZ, Defendant.

No. COA18-144

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO ERROR.
#### Kenneth STEPHENS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 81772.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 22, 2003.

*862Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Stephens (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo 1994,1 two counts of assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.050, and three counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court sentenced Movant, as a prior and persistent offender, to concurrent terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of probation for murder in the first degree, and thirty years imprisonment for each of the remaining five counts. Movant thereafter filed his direct appeal, which this Court affirmed. *State v. Stephens,*4 S.W.3d 631 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). After the mandate was issued in his direct appeal, Movant filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. This appeal follows the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law denying Movant’s motion following an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Mark Joseph Corrao, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
      Mark Joseph Corrao*


*Mark
      Joseph Corrao*


*Chief
      Financial Officer*




*November
      13, 2007*
In the MATTER OF E.W.P.

No. COA18-183

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Reginald Underwood FULLARD

No. 309P15-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Reginald Fullard, for Fullard, Reginald

Mr. James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th of May 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of May 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of May 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

*393"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."