alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 12.1
                                                                   ------------


AMM Holdings, Inc.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, Ratio of Earnings to
Cash Interest Expense and Ratio of Net Debt to EBITDA

<TABLE>
<S>                                                          <C>
Fixed Charge Calculation
Income before taxes and extraordinary item                   (37,047)
Fixed charges                                                 37,607
                                                             -------
                                                                 560
Fixed charges                                                 37,607
                                                             -------
                                                                 0.0
                                                             =======
Fixed charges:
    Interest                                                  35,747
    Rent (1/3 of annual expense)                               1,860
                                                             -------
                                                              37,607
                                                             =======
Ratio of Earnings to Cash Interest Expense

Earnings                                                         560
Cash Interest Expense                                         28,634
                                                             -------
                                                                 0.0
                                                             =======
Net Debt to EBITDA

Debt                                                         295,815
EBITDA                                                        23,423
                                                             -------
                                                               12.63
                                                             =======
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Cancer Institute, including consideration of personnel qualifications 
and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute Basic Sciences.
    Date: November 7-8, 2005.
    Time: November 7, 2005, 7 p.m. to 11 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, Versailles I, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Time: November 8, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 
9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 6, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Florence E. Farber, PhD, Health Scientific 
Administrator, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 2115, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7628, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b5d5d0d4b7b555253155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066060307646686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 30, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20252 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DALE Patrick Martin v. Mike SLAGLE (Supt.)

No. 210P16-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Michael T. Wood, Daniel P. O'Brien,, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Dale P. Martin, for Martin, Dale Patrick.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 7th of November 2018 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Kevin Jonathan MITCHELL

No. 208P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Kirby H. Smith, III, Attorney at Law, for Mitchell, Kevin Jonathan.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of July 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the quarterly report of ERICO International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to such officer’sknowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and forthe periods expressed in the Report.Date: August 9, 2006          By:  /s/ William H. Roj   Name:  William H. Roj  Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand Director      By:                               /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber   Name:  Jeffrey R. Steinhilber  Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Director
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B ARB AR

A STUAR T R O B INSON, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. TAC OM A C OM M UNITY C O LLEGE, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-35954 D.C . No. 3:12-c v-05614-B HS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington B e nja m in H. Se ttle , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

April 7, 2014 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , GR AB ER , a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. B arbara Stua rt R obinson a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in he r disc rim i nation a c tion unde r Title II of the Am e ric ans with Disa bilitie s Ac t

(“ A DA” ) and the W a shington La w Aga i nst Disc rim inat ion



# FIL ED APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(“ W ALD” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo.

W ong v . Re ge nts of Univ. of C

al ., 192 F.3d 807, 817 (9th C ir. 1999). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use R o binson fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r she wa s qua lifie d for re -e nrollm e nt to thec olle ge , a nd whe the r she wa s de nie d re -e nrollm e nt be c a use of he r disa bility . Se e E.R.K

. v . Haw . De

p’t of Educ
. , 728 F.3d 982, 992 (9th C ir. 2013) (listing the

e le m e nts of a

prim a fa c ie c a se of disc rim ination unde r Title II of the A DA a

n d e xpla ining theburde n of pe rsua sion on the “ othe rwise qua lifie d” e le m e nt); W

ong , 192 F.3d a

t 822 (disc ussing thede finition of “ qua l ifie d” ); se e also W ash. State C o mmc ’n Ac c e

ss Proje c t v . Re

gal C i ne mas, Inc . , 293 P.3d 413, 421- 22 (W a sh. C t. App. 2013) (e le m e n ts of prim a fa c ie c a se of disc rim ination unde r the W LAD). W e re je c t R obinson’ s c onte n tions c onc e rning judic ia l bia s, se t forth in he r Se pte m be r 11, 2013 notic e , a s unsupporte d by the re c o rd. Ta c om a C om

m unity C olle ge ’ s m o tion for judic ia l notic e , file d on April 26, 2013, is gra

nte d. R obinson’ s m otion for judgme nt, file d on July 12, 2013, is denie d.

1 2 - 3 5 9 5 4 2W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f. Se e Padge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 3 5 9 5 4 3
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Now Auto Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Scott
Miller, Chief Executive Officer/ Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company, certify in my capacities as officer of the Company, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.





/s/ Scott MillerScott
      MillerChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      6, 2010/s/
      Faith ForbisFaith
      ForbisChief
      Financial Officer





May
6, 2010
* Pursuant to 5th Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. Rule

47.5.4.

Corrected

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 98-11017

______________________

EMMA MAE MCDONNELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

US POSTAL SERVICE; WILLIAM A. HENDERSON,

US Postal Service Postmaster General,

Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(7:97-CV-33-X)

__________________________________________________________________

November 5, 1999

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6.
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global  Diversified
Futures Fund L.P. (the  "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Daniel R.  McAuliffe,  Jr.,  Chief  Financial  Officer and
Director of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr
    Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
    Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
    Chief Financial Officer and Director
    March 27, 2003
Dabeeruddin KHAJA v. Fatima HUSNA

No. 375A15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Deborah Sandlin, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Khaja, Dabeeruddin.

Debra A. Griffiths, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Fatima Husna, Chris Kremer, Attorney at Law, for Husna, Fatima.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of September 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of December 2018 by Defendant for Leave to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

*632"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE DALTON BROWN

No. 7319SC821

(Filed 9 January 1974)

Criminal Law § 161— appeal as exception to judgment

The appeal is an exception to the judgment and presents the face of the record proper for review.

Appeal by defendant from *Seay, Judge,*June 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Randolph County.

The defendant, Willie Dalton Brown, was charged in a two-count bill of indictment proper in form with forgery and uttering a forged instrument.

The defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, pleaded not guilty. He was found not guilty of forgery and guilty of uttering a forged instrument.

From a judgment imposing a prison sentence of not less than three nor more than five years, he appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan and Associate Attorney Archie W. Anders for the State.*

*Coltrane and Gavin by W. E. Gavin for defendant appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

The appeal is an exception to the judgment and presents the face of the record proper for review, *State v. Thurgood,*11 N.C. App. 405, 181 S.E. 2d 128 (1971); *State v. Martin,*10 *484N.C. App. 181, 178 S.E. 2d 32 (1970); 3 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 161, p. 112.

We have carefully reviewed the organization of the court, the plea, the verdict, and the judgment and find

No error.

Judges Campbkll and Baley concur.
#### Isaac Brownfield’s Estate. Appeal of Anna B. Crossland.

*Will—Trust and trustees.*

Testator gave a legacy to his daughter equal to one sixth the value of the coal under land devised to his son, and provided, “ I direct my executor to invest in some safe way the bequest of my daughter, and to retain control of the same allowing her the use of the same, or if the said investment should be an interest or dividend bearing investment, to pay over to her semi-annually the interest thereof during her life, and if she should die without leaving lawful issue surviving her,” then over, etc., and if issue, then to hold until they should reach full age, etc. Testator’s children entered into a family agreement fixing the value of the coal, and thus liquidating the amount of the legacy. *Held,*that under the will the legacy to the daughter was in trust, and that this trust was not affected by the family agreement.

Argued May 8, 1899.

Appeal, No. 275, Jan T., 1898, by Anna B. Crossland, from decree of O. C. Fayette Co., Sept. T., 1895, No. 44, dismissing exceptions to «auditor’s report.

Before Stebbett, C. J., Gbeen, McCollum;, Mitchell and • Dean, J J.

Affirmed.

*164Exceptions to auditor’s report.

The facts appear by the report of Brownfield’s Estate, Brownfield’s Appeal, ante, p. 151..

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

*Gteorge H.*Lepper, with him *8. E. Ewing,*for appellant.

*Edward Campbell,*for appellee.

October 6, 1899:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mitchell,

The only question involved in this appeal not discussed and determined in W. W. & I. H. Brownfield’s Appeal, No. 279, opinion filed herewith, ante, p. 151, is raised by the assignment of error to the finding of the auditor that the legacy to appellant was not absolute but in trust.

The will of the téstator gave, inter alia, a legacy to this appellant, equal to one sixth the value of the coal under the land devised to his sons, and provided, “ I direct my executors to invest in some sáfe way the bequest of my daughter Anna and to retain control of the same, allowing her the use of the same, or if the said investment should be an interest or dividend bearing investment, to pay over to her semi-annually the interest thereof during her life, and if she should die without leaving lawful issue surviving her,” then over, etc., and if issue, then to hold until they should reach full age, etc.

The trust thus imposed by the testator was not disturbed in any way by the agreement of the children in March, 1891. It could not have been, for the will was not attached in any way, and its provisions are clear. But the agreement had no such object. It was merely to liquidate the amount of the legacy which the will made dependent on the value of the coal. This was in affirmance not in antagonism to the will, and in no way affected the trust.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of appellant.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ted Kozub, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ingenium Capital Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                  

|By:    |                             | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|       | /s/ Ted Kozub               | 
|Name:  | Ted Kozub                   | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer and | 
|       | Chief Financial Officer     | 
|Date:  | December 15 , 2005          | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---