R ayM abus has bee n sub st i tut ed for hi s pre dece ss or, D on al d W i nt er , * as S ec re t ary, D epartm entof the N avy und erF ed. R . A pp . P . 43 (c )( 2).

T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt ** e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on *** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ARTHUR ROSE , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. R A Y M A B U S , S e c r e t a ry , D e pa rtm e ntof * N a v y a n d a c tin g in h is in d iv id u a l c ap a c ity a c tin g w ith in th e c o u r s e a n d s c o p e o f h is author i ty a tN A S M i r a m a rS a n D i e go (M ar i ne C orps A i r S t at i on M i ra m ar ), D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 55125 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 4 7 1 - B T MBL M ME MOR AN DU M **

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia B a rry T . M os kow i t z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 26, 2012 *** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an d G O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JU L 11 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 55125 2 A rth u rR o s e ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t in h is e m p lo y m e n t a c tio n u n d e rT itle V I I . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f p a rtia l s u m m a ryju d g m e n t. W h ite v. C i t y of Sp arks , 5 0 0 F. 3 d 9 5 3 , 9 5 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton R os e ’ s r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m ba s e d on hi s pe r f

orm a nc e e va l ua t i on be c aus e R os e f a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne d is p u te o f

m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rth e r e w a s ac au s a l c o n n e c tio n b e tw e e n h is al l eged prot ec t ed ac t i vi ty and the eval uat i on , and w hether defe nd ant ’ s l egi t i m at e, non- di s c r i m i na t ory r e a s on f orthe e va l ua t i on c om m e nt s a nd r a t i ngs w e r e apr e t e xt f o rr e ta lia tio n . Se e Stegal l v . C i tade l

B r oad. C o. , 35 0 F . 3d 10 61 , 10 65 -66 (9th C i r. 2004) ( s e tt i ng f

orth the f r a m e w ork f

ora na l y z i ng ar e t a l i a t i on c l a i m a nd e xpl a i ni ng thatevi dence of pret extm ustbe spec i fi c and subst ant i al ); V i l l i ar i m o v . A loha Is lan d A i r, Inc. , 2 8 1 F . 3 d 1 0 5 4 , 1 0 6 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (ei g h t een -m o n th l ap se be tw e e n pr ot e c t e d a c t i vi ty a nd a n a dve r s e e m pl oy m e nta c t i on i s t oo l ong t o gi ve ri se t o an i nfer ence of causat i on ). T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enton R ose’ s r et al i at ory hara ss m entcl ai m because R ose f ai l ed t o rai se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i al fa ctas t o w hether the al l eged cond uctw as because of hi s prot ec t ed ac t i vi ty, or w as s u f f ic ie n tlys e v e r e o rp e rv a s iv e to a lte rth e c o n d itio n s o f h is e m p lo y m e n t. See R ay11- 55125 3 v . H e nde rs on , 21 7 F . 3d 12 34 , 12 45 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( di sc ussi ng re t al i at ory hara ss m ent ). W e do n otconsi der m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n the ope ni ng br i e f

, nora r gum e nt s a nd a l l e ga t i ons r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on ap p e a l. Se e P adge t t

v . W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). R ose’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.