alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4859 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work opportunity 

credit to small business which hire individuals who are members of 

the Ready Reserve or National Guard. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Ms. JENKINS (for herself, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. MOORE

of Kansas, Mr. OLSON, Mr. PETRI, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. TAYLOR, 

Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. FLEMING, 

Mr. COLE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. LANCE, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

work opportunity credit to small business which hire 

individuals who are members of the Ready Reserve or 

National Guard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire A Hero Act of 

5 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4859 IH

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO SMALL BUSI2 NESSES FOR HIRING MEMBERS OF READY 

3 RESERVE OR NATIONAL GUARD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (H), by striking the pe7 riod at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, 

8 and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(J) in the case of an eligible employer (as 

10 defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i)), an indi11 vidual who is a member of— 

12 ‘‘(i) the Ready Reserve (as described 

13 in section 10142 of title 10, United States 

14 Code), or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the National Guard (as defined 

16 in section 101(c)(1) of such title 10).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to wages paid or incurred 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act in tax21 able years ending after such date. 

22 (2) CURRENT EMPLOYEES COVERED BY CRED23 IT.—For purposes of applying section 51 of the In24 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals described 

25 in section 51(d)(1)(J) of such Code, as added by 

26 this Act, who are employed by an eligible employer 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4859 IH

1 (as defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i) of such Code) 

2 on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be 

3 treated as beginning work for such employer on such 

4 date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
THOMAS J. HARRIS

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

3901 STONE WAY N., SUITE 202

SEATTLE, WA 98103

206.547.6050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**REGISTERED AUDITOR'S CONSENT**

 

 

 

**I, Thomas J. Harris,CPA, of 3901 Stone Way North, Suite # 202, Seattle, WA. 98103, do hereby consent to the use of my report dated January 14, 2013on the financial statements of CelLynx Group, Inc. as of September 30, 2012 be included in and made part of any filing to be filedwith the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. I also consent to your use of my name as in the Experts Section of those forms.**

** **

**Dated this 13th day of March, 2013.**

** **

**/s/ Thomas J. Harris CPA**

****

**Thomas J. Harris**

**Certified Public Accountant**

** **
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yun Ping Lin, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 848]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered August 22, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted kidnapping in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of SVs to 25 years; and order, same court (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), entered on or about November 12, 1999, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to set aside the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s plea was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered. There is no support in the record for defendant’s *438claims that his plea was coerced by the court or that he had difficulty understanding the court-appointed Mandarin interpreter. In fact, the court carefully ascertained that defendant understood the interpreter.

After affording defendant a suitable opportunity to be heard, the sentencing court properly rejected defendant’s application to withdraw his plea. The reason offered by defendant in support of his application was an unelaborated desire to proceed to trial and did not constitute a legal basis for withdrawal of the plea.

Defendant’s motion to set aside his conviction was properly denied without a hearing. The motion court properly found the motion to be both procedurally defective and without merit. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Silver Standard Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Benson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:/s/ Paul BensonPaul BensonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 22, 2017
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-093   -      -CV

IN RE InN rReE DoOnNaAlLdD MoOoOdDyY, SrR.	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  :  DUPAUPHINIOTOT, GLIVINGSTON, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  April 2, 2009
<PAGE> 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


AGGREGATE PAYMENT SCHEDULE

Household Finance Corporation
Household Auto Receivables Corporation
Household Automobile Revolving Trust I  1998-1
<S>                                            <C>

Original Principal Class A
   Class A-1                                   139,370,000
   Class A-2                                    54,000,000
   Class A-3                                   143,000,000
   Class A-4                                    80,832,000
   Class A-5                                   100,000,000
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)
   Class A-1                                       139,370
   Class A-2                                        54,000
   Class A-3                                       143,000
   Class A-4                                        80,832
   Class A-5                                       100,000
Original Principal Class B
   Class B-1                                 99,303,000.00
   Class B-2                                 94,338,000.00
Number of Class B Bonds (000's)
   Class B-1                                        99,303
   Class B-2                                        94,338
Original Principal Class C
   Class C                                   60,823,000.00
Number of Class C Bonds (000's)
   Class C                                          60,823


Distribution Date                                                    1999

CLASS A
Class A-1 Principal Distribution                               127,887,012.71
Class A-1 Interest Distribution                                  2,066,779.99
Class A-2 Principal Distribution                                18,145,186.98
Class A-2 Interest Distribution                                  2,983,803.86
Class A-3 Principal Distribution                                         0.00
Class A-3 Interest Distribution                                  8,138,093.14
Class A-4 Principal Distribution                                         0.00
Class A-4 Interest Distribution                                  4,641,105.62
Class A-5 Principal Distribution                                30,812,818.16
Class A-5 Interest Distribution                                  4,806,030.43

CLASS B
Class B-1 Principal Distribution                                32,165,434.65
Class B-1 Interest Distribution                                  5,912,059.67
Class B-2 Principal Distribution                                30,557,312.92
Class B-2 Interest Distribution                                  5,507,843.09

CLASS C
Class C   Principal Distribution                                19,701,241.22
Class C   Interest Distribution                                  3,552,123.07

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130316 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130316 

 COA: 256561 

Muskegon CC: 02-048280-FH

STERLING BROADEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
The STATE of North Carolina, v. Brian Nicholas EVANS, Defendant.

No. COA17-976

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of DaimlerChrysler AG (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2005 and amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A on the date hereof (the "Report"), Prof. Jürgen E.
Schrempp, as Chairman of the Board of Management of the Company, and Bodo Uebber, as Member of the Board of Management, Finance & Controlling / Financial Services, of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|/s/JÜRGEN E. SCHREMPP |  |                                                                             
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:                 |  | Prof. Jürgen E. Schrempp                                                    
|Title:                |  | Chairman of the Board of Management                                         
|Date:                 |  | June 24, 2005                                                               
|/s/BODO UEBBER        |  |                                                                             
|Name:                 |  | Bodo Uebber                                                                 
|Title:                |  | Member of the Board of Management
Finance & Controlling / Financial Services
|Date:                 |  | June 24, 2005                                                               

This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

t0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147521

SPE UTILITY CONTRACTORS, L.L.C.

, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 147521

COA: 310885

Tax Tribunal: 00

- 432073

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4695 

To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 to provide financial assistance to local educational agencies that 

educate alien children admitted to the United States as citizens of one 

of the Freely Associated States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. HONDA, Mr. SABLAN, and Mr. PIERLUISI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

A BILL 

To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to provide financial assistance to 

local educational agencies that educate alien children admitted to the United States as citizens of one of the 

Freely Associated States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4695 IH

1 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS RELATING TO ELEMENTARY AND 

2 SECONDARY EDUCATION OF CITIZENS OF 

3 FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES. 

4 (a) PURPOSE.—Section 8001 of the Elementary and 

5 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7701) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

8 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(6) educate alien children admitted to the 

12 United States as citizens of one of the Freely Asso13 ciated States.’’. 

14 (b) PAYMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE FEDERALLY CON15 NECTED CHILDREN.—Section 8003(a) of such Act (20 

16 U.S.C. 7703(a)) is amended— 

17 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

18 (A) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

19 at the end; 

20 (B) in subparagraph (G), by striking the 

21 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

22 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(H) resided in the United States pursu24 ant to an admission into the United States as 

25 a citizen of the Republic of the Marshall IsVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:22 Feb 26, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4695.IH H4695

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4695 IH

1 lands, the Federated States of Micronesia, or 

2 the Republic of Palau.’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(G) Multiply the number of children de6 scribed in paragraph (1)(H) by a factor of 

7 1.25.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, K.
Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ K. Rupert Murdoch

K. Rupert Murdoch
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
September 25, 2003

[A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by Fox
Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Scott              Miller                                |   |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   | Scott              Miller                                         |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer May                6, 2010 |   |   |   |

|   | /s/                  Faith Forbis                                        |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   | Faith                Forbis                                              |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                    Financial OfficerMay                    6, 2010 |   |   |   |

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 9, 2013

NO. 03-11-00155-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Joseph William Dotson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s order. IT IS 

THEREFORE ORDERED that the order of the trial court be reversed and the cause is 

remanded for further proceedings; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1910-BJ-4789; ES-053739, Group No. 42, Illinois]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Illinois.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Illinois

T. 9 S., R. 3 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the north boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines 
and the survey of the Lock and Dam No. 25 acquisition boundary on 
two accreted islands in the Mississippi River in Township 9 South, 
Range 3 West, of the Fourth Principal Meridian, in the State of 
Illinois, and was accepted on September 28, 2005.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be made available to the public as a matter of information.

    Dated: September 28, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05-20172 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
STATE of North Carolina v. John H. SAYRE

No. 330A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed September 21, 2018

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Albert Hickman, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental
      Control Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Environmental Control Corp.                                                                

Dated: August 14, 2008

| | /s/
      Albert Hickman                       
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Albert Hickman                                 
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
| | Environmental Control Corp.                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental
Control Corp. and will be retained by Environmental Control Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---