60108 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 

1Commissioner Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting. 

OMB Control Number: 1029–0107. 

Summary: States and Indian tribes 

having an approved reclamation plan 

may establish, administer and operate 

self-sustaining State and Indian Tribeadministered programs to insure private 

property against damages caused by 

land subsidence resulting from 

underground mining. States and Indian 

tribes interested in requesting monies 

for their insurance programs would 

apply to the Director of OSM. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

Frequency of Collection: Once. 

Description of Respondents: States 

and Indian tribes with approved coal 

reclamation plans. 

Total Annual Responses: 1. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 8. 

Total Annual Non-Wage Costs: $0. 

Send comments on the need for the 

collections of information for the 

performance of the functions of the 

agency; the accuracy of the agency’s 

burden estimates; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information collections; and ways to 

minimize the information collection 

burdens on respondents, such as use of 

automated means of collections of the 

information, to the following addresses. 

Please refer to OMB control number 

1029–0092 for Part 745 and 1029–0107 

for Part 887 in your correspondence. 

Dated: June 28, 2005. 

John R. Craynon, 

Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. 

[FR Doc. 05–20574 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–309–A and B 

(Second Review)] 

Magnesium From Canada 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determinations to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the countervailing 

duty orders on magnesium from Canada. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

orders on magnesium from Canada 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. A 

schedule for the reviews will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193) Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2005, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to 

full reviews in the subject five-year 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (70 

FR 38199, July 1, 2005) was adequate, 

but found that the respondent interested 

party group response was inadequate. 

The Commission also found that other 

circumstances warranted conducting 

full reviews.1 A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20621 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–531] 

In the Matter of Certain Network 

Controllers and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Decision Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motion To 

Terminate the Investigation Based on a 

Settlement Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

issued by the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on September 19, 

2005, granting complainant’s motion to 

terminate the investigation based on a 

settlement agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3115. Copies of the public version 

of the IDs and all nonconfidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 19, 2005, the Commission 

instituted an investigation under section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based on a complaint filed by 

Marvell International, Ltd. of Hamilton, 

Bermuda (‘‘Marvell’’), alleging a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain network 

controllers and products containing 

same by reason of infringement of 

claims 68, 70, and 71 of U.S. Patent No. 

6, 462,688 (the ‘‘688 patent’’), and 

claims 22–32, 54, and 55 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,775,529 (the ‘‘529 patent’’). 70 FR 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 60109 

3067 (January 19, 2005). The 

complainant named Realtek 

Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu, 

Taiwan, and Real Communications, Inc., 

of San Jose, CA (collectively, ‘‘Realtek’’), 

as respondents. Subsequently, the 

complaint and notice of investigation 

were amended to add an additional 

respondent, BizLink Technology, Inc. 

(‘‘BizLink’’). 

On August 31, 2005, complainant 

Marvell moved to terminate the 

investigation in whole pursuant to 19 

U.S.C. 1337(c) and 19 CFR 210.21 based 

on a settlement agreement. On 

September 12, 2005, respondents 

Realtek and BizLink filed a response to 

the motion. Respondents do not oppose 

the motion to terminate. On the same 

day, the Commission investigative 

attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in 

support of the motion. On September 

16, 2005, Marvell filed a reply to 

respondents’ and the IA’s responses. 

On September 19, 2005, the ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 21) granting 

complainant’s motion. No party 

petitioned for review of the ALJ’s ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

§ 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 7, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20571 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–636–638 

(Second Review)] 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, 

France, and India 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on stainless steel wire rod 

from Brazil, France, and India. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on stainless steel wire rod from 

Brazil, France, and India would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule 

for the reviews will be established and 

announced at a later date. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2005, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to 

full reviews in the subject five-year 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (70 

FR 38207, July 1, 2005) was adequate, 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response with respect to France 

was adequate, but found that the 

respondent interested party group 

responses with respect to Brazil and 

India were inadequate. However, the 

Commission determined to conduct full 

reviews concerning subject imports 

from Brazil and India to promote 

administrative efficiency in light of its 

decision to conduct a full review with 

respect to subject imports from France. 

A record of the Commissioners’ votes, 

the Commission’s statement on 

adequacy, and any individual 

Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the 

Secretary and at the Commission’s Web 

site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20620 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–510; Enforcement 

Proceeding] 

In the Matter of Systems for Detecting 

and Removing Viruses or Worms, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of Institution 

of Formal Enforcement Proceeding 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has instituted a formal 

enforcement proceeding relating to a 

cease and desist order issued at the 

conclusion of the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of 

the General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3152. Copies of the public version 

of all nonconfidential documents filed 

in connection with this investigation are 

or will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–2000. Hearing-impaired persons are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

patent-based section 337 investigation 

was instituted by the Commission on 

June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed 

by Trend Micro Inc. (‘‘Trend Micro’’) of 

Cupertino, California. 69 FR 32044–

32045 (June 8, 2004). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation into the United 

States, or the sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

systems for detecting and removing 

viruses or worms, components thereof,