alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20622]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-860 (Review)]

Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from Japan

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year 
review concerning the antidumping duty order on tin- and chromium-
coated steel sheet from Japan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping 
duty order on tin- and chromium-coated steel sheet from Japan would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within 
a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be 
established and announced at a later date. For further information 
concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, 
consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, 
subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, 
and F (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 4, 2005, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-
year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission 
found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group 
responses to its notice of institution (70 FR 38210, July 1, 2005) were 
adequate. A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's Web site.

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 11, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20622 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 45 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and health carerelated provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mrs. BACHMANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 

Education and the Workforce, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, Natural 

Resources, Rules, House Administration, Appropriations, and the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and health care-related provisions in the Health Care 

and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 45 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA AND HEALTH CARE-RE2 LATED PROVISIONS IN THE HEALTH CARE 

3 AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 

4 2010. 

5 (a) PPACA.—Effective as of the enactment of the 

6 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 

7 111–148), such Act (other than subsection (d) of section 

8 1899A of the Social Security Act, as added and amended 

9 by sections 3403 and 10320 of such Act) is repealed, and 

10 the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act 

11 (other than such subsection (d)) are restored or revived 

12 as if such Act had not been enacted. 

13 (b) HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE

14 HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF

15 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care 

16 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

17 111–152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act 

18 are repealed, and the provisions of law amended or re19 pealed by such title or subtitle, respectively, are restored 

20 or revived as if such title and subtitle had not been en21 acted. 

22 SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

23 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

24 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

25 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

26 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 45 IH

1 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

2 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

3 House of Representatives, as long as such statement has 

4 been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with
#### Jarrett C. HUE v. Charles RODRIGUE, Louisiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 2003-C-1287.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Hue, Jarrett C.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 81,731; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 0246.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4947 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4947

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the per-fiscal year 
 calculation of days of certain active duty or active service used to 
reduce the minimum age at which a member of a reserve component of the 
         uniformed services may retire for non-regular service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

 Mr. Latham (for himself and Mr. Boren) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the per-fiscal year 
 calculation of days of certain active duty or active service used to 
reduce the minimum age at which a member of a reserve component of the 
         uniformed services may retire for non-regular service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reserve Retirement Deployment Credit 
Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PER-FISCAL YEAR CALCULATION OF DAYS OF CERTAIN 
              ACTIVE DUTY OR ACTIVE SERVICE TO REDUCE ELIGIBILITY AGE 
              FOR RETIREMENT FOR NON-REGULAR SERVICE.

    (a) Effect of 90-day Periods of Service.--Section 12731(f)(2)(A) of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``below 60 years 
of age by three months for each aggregate of 90 days on which such 
person so performs in any fiscal year after such date, subject to 
subparagraph (C)'' and inserting ``, subject to subparagraph (C), below 
60 years of age by three months for each aggregate of 90 days on which 
such person serves on such active duty or performs such active service 
after such date''.
    (b) Retroactive Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection 
(a) shall take effect as of January 28, 2008, and as if included in the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 
110-181) as enacted.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

# Name:

Advisory Committee for engineering (1170).

# Date/Time:

November 8, 2005, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; November 9, 2005, 8 a.m.-1 p.m.

# Place:

National Science Foundation, Room 375.

# Type of Meeting:

Open.

# Contact Person:

Deborah Young, Administrative Officer, and Office of the Assistant Director for engineering, 703-292-8301.

# Purpose of Meeting:

To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.

# Agenda:

The principal focus of the forthcoming meeting will be on strategic issues, both for the Directorate and the Foundation as a whole. The Committee will also address matters relating to the future of the engineering profession and engineering education.

Dated: October 4, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20259  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9555-01-M
nlef_ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 


8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# For Further Information Contact:

                         Carla White, International Education Programs Service, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, NW., Suite 6000, Washington, DC 20006-8521. Telephone: (202) 502-7700 or via the Internet:                         *ddra@ed.gov.*

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339. 

                        Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format (                        *e.g.*, Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this section.                     

## VIII. Other Information 

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*

To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530. 

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

Dated: October 5, 2005. 

Sally L. Stroup, 

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education. 

[FR Doc. 05-20365 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | By:                   | /s/ Gregory J. Martin                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Gregory J. Martin                                   |
|   |                  | Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                  |
|   | Dated: March 15, 2013 |

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4726 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in projects to encourage the design, planning, and construction of the North Los Angeles 

County Regional Water Recycling Project in the State of California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Mr. MCKEON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate 

in projects to encourage the design, planning, and construction of the North Los Angeles County Regional 

Water Recycling Project in the State of California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Los Angeles 

5 County Water Recycling Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4726 IH

1 SEC. 2. NORTH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL WATER 

2 RECYCLING PROJECT. 

3 (a) RECYCLING PROJECTS.—The Reclamation 

4 Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act 

5 (Public Law 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) 

6 is amended by adding after section 16ll the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. ll. NORTH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL 

8 WATER RECYCLING PROJECT. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in cooperation 

10 with the County of Los Angeles Department of Public 

11 Works and the County of Los Angeles Waterworks Dis12 trict No. 40, may participate in the design, planning, and 

13 construction of the North Los Angeles County regional 

14 water recycling project described in the report submitted 

15 under section 1606(c). 

16 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

17 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

18 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

20 shall not be used for operation and maintenance of the 

21 project described in subsection (a). 

22 ‘‘(d) IN-KIND SERVICES.—In-kind services per23 formed by the County of Los Angeles Department of Pub24 lic Works or the County of Los Angeles Waterworks Dis25 trict No. 40 shall be considered a part of the local cost 

26 share to complete the project described in subsection (a). 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4726 IH

1 ‘‘(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

2 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

3 $40,000,000.’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of sec5 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

6 inserting after the item relating to section 16ll the fol7 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. North Los Angeles County Regional Water Recycling Program.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
1

 The Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2178

___________

Mary J. Roselli, *

*

Appellant, * 

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Paul H. O'Neill, * 

Secretary of the Treasury, * [UNPUBLISHED]

* 

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 14, 2004

Filed: March 15, 2004

___________

Before BYE, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Mary Roselli appeals from a final order entered in the district court1

 granting

summary judgment in an employment discrimination action in favor of her employer,

the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Roselli claimed that she was discriminated

against on the basis of her age, gender, and race in violation of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29
-2-

U.S.C. § 621, et seq. She also claims that after filing her Equal Employment

Opportunity complaints, she was retaliated against when she was not promoted to

various positions at the IRS. The district court granted the IRS summary judgment on

each of Roselli's eight allegations, concluding that Roselli had failed to exhaust her

administrative remedies as to some claims, failed to show that the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her non-selection was pretextual as to other claims, and

failed to show that she was subjected to an adverse employment action to support her

retaliation claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial

court's disposition of this matter. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

_______________________________
Francis X. DE LUCA and the New Hanover County Board of Education v. Josh STEIN, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of North Carolina and North Carolina Coastal Federation and Sound Rivers, Inc., Intervenors

No. 339A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Paul Stam, Attorney at Law, Apex, R. Daniel Gibson, Attorney at Law, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education

Amy O'Neal, Attorney at Law, for De Luca, Francis X., et al.

Jennie Wilhelm Hauser, Special Deputy Attorney General

Mary MacLean Asbill, Attorney at Law, Brooks Rainey Pearson, Attorney at Law, Blakely E. Hildebrand, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Coastal Federation, et al.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Lindsey Vance Smith, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Allison Schafter, Attorney at Law, for N.C. School Boards Association

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of October 2018 by Plaintiff (New Hanover County Board of Education) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
#### Walter Herb FYLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 22, 2003.

Walter Herb Fyler, Sneads, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

SHARP, W., J.,

Fyler appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, for post-*443conviction relief. He claims his classification as a violent habitual offender resulted in an illegal sentence because the jury did not make findings. *See generally, Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). However, this court has held that an habitual offender classification based on a defendant’s prior criminal record does not require a jury determination pursuant to the holding in *Apprendi. See Walker v. State,*790 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); *Wright v. State,*780 So.2d 216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Taking judicial notice of our own records, we note that Fyler raised this same argument in a prior 3.850 motion.1 The fact that he is now relying on *Ring v. Arizona,*536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) makes no difference. We affirm this appeal not only because it lacks merit, but also because it is successive and thus improper.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.

1

. *Fyler v. State,*827 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas Nacoleon HARDING

No. 116P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Harding, Nicholas Nacoleon.

Anne J. Brown, Special Deputy Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of April 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

*206Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of April 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of April 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."