alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41502

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SANCHES-PENALOSA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-418-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Sanches-Penalosa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Sanches-Penalosa has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JERRY WAYNE WEBB

No. 7528SC131

(Filed 2 July 1975)

1. Crime Against Nature § 2 — 'Constitutionality of statute

The crime against nature statute, G.S. 14-177, is not unconstitutionally vague.

2. Crime Against Nature § 1; Rape § 17 — crime against nature — assault with intent to commit rape — two offenses — no double jeopardy

Elements of the crime against nature, G.S. 14-177, and assault with intent to commit rape, G.S. 14-22, are distinct and different, and convictions for both charges upon the evidence in these cases ■ did not twice put defendant in jeopardy for one crime.

On *writ of certiorari*to review trial before *Jackson, Judge.,*Judgments entered 24 April 1974 in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 15 April 1975.

: Defendant was charged in indictments proper in form with the following: Case No. 72CR19196, rape; Case Nó. 72CR19020, kidnapping; Case No. 72CR19195, crime against nature. In Case No. 72CR19019 he was arrested under a proper warrant charging him with carrying a concealed weapon. In Case No. 72CR19196 defendant was tried on his plea of not guilty to assault with intent to commit rape. He also pled not guilty in each remaining case. All cases were consolidated for trial. The jury found defendant guilty on. each charge, and judgment was imposed in each case.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Assistant Attorney General Charles J. Murray for the State.*

*Michael Edward Vaughn for defendant appellant. .*

PARKER, Judge.

[1] Prior to his pleading not guilty to the charge of committing a crime against nature, defendant’s motion to quash the indictment of that charge was denied. He assigns error to this denial, contending that the statute upon which the indictment was based, G.S. 14-177, is unconstitutionally vague. This specific question was decided adverse to defendant’s contention in *State v. Moles,*17 N.C. App. 664, 195 S.E. 2d 352 (1973) and in *State v. Crouse,*22 N.C. App. 47, 205 S.E. 2d 361 (1974). *See Perkins v. State of North Carolina,*234 F. Supp. 333 (W.D.N.C. 1964).

*527
      [2] Defendant also urges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to arrest the judgment on his conviction of committing a crime against nature. His contention is that the crimes of assault with intent to commit rape, G.S. 14-22, and committing a crime against nature, G.S. 14-177; are essentially the same offense, and convictions for both charges upon the evidence in the cases on this appeal constitute putting defendant twice in jeopardy for one crime. We disagree. The elements of each offense are distinct and different. Furthermore, the record discloses ample and separate evidence to support verdicts on the charges contained in the indictments numbered 72CR19196 and 72CR19195.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error appearing therein with respect to the indictments, arraignments, the trial and the judgments.

No error.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Arnold concur.
#### Robert SMITH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-0524.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 2, 2003.

Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s April 14, 2003 order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Order entered May 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00052-CV

KOZAMESA, INC., Appellant

V.

MERIDIAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS FUND V, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-15377

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 20, 2013 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant shall file its brief on or before June 10, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*





*Mark
      L. Kay*


*Chief
      Executive Officer*




*August
      14, 2007*
EXHIBIT 21

Private Media Group, Inc. Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |                       
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Place of Incorporation
|                                    | 
|Cine Craft, Ltd.                    |  | GIBRALTAR             
|                                    | 
|Coldfair Holdings Limited           |  | CYPRUS                
|                                    | 
|Fraserside Holdings Ltd.            |  | CYPRUS                
|                                    | 
|Peach Entertainment Distribution AB |  | SWEDEN                
|                                    | 
|Milcap Media Group S.L.             |  | SPAIN                 
|                                    | 
|Private Media Group Services S.L.   |  | SPAIN                 
|                                    | 
|Milcap Publishing Group Italy Srl   |  | ITALY                 
|                                    | 
|Private Benelux B.V.                |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|                                    | 
|Private France SAS                  |  | FRANCE                
|                                    | 
|Private North America, Ltd.         |  | U.S. (California)     
|                                    | 
|Barbuda B.V.                        |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|                                    | 
|Ceresland S.L.                      |  | SPAIN                 
|                                    | 
|Private Media Group Canada, Inc.    |  | CANADA
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA is submitting the following information collection to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until March 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, Fax No. 
703-518-6669, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c5cbc6c9c5c9dac9e8c6cbddc986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09646a676864687b6849676a7c68276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Central Liquidity Facility Repayment Agreement, Regular 
Member.
    OMB Number: 3133-0061.
    Form Number: CLF-8703.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Description: The form is used by CLF regular members borrowing from 
the CLF.
    Respondents: Credit unions which are CLF regular members who borrow 
from the CLF.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Record keepers: 40.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 2.875 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Other. As the need for borrowing arises.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 115 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: 0.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on January 27, 
2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-2007 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Sun River Energy,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Redgie  Green,  President  of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Redgie Green
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Redgie Green, CEO & CFO
Date: December 2, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  331,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,837
<INVENTORY>                                    298,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               686,038
<PP&E>                                       1,751,345
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,249,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,733,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,403
<BONDS>                                      1,094,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,829
<OTHER-SE>                                     942,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,733,221
<SALES>                                      2,951,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,988,932
<CGS>                                        2,182,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,182,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               140,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (515,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (194,447)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (320,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (320,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.12)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lance K. Bradford, Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A-2 (this “Form10-KSB/A-2”) of Vestin Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82377 and34-47986; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Lance K. Bradford
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4673 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4673

             For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

Mr. Pastor of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARTHA PALMILLAS DE MORALES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Martha Palmillas de Morales 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Martha Palmillas de Morales enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Martha Palmillas de Morales, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Martha 
Palmillas de Morales shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Excellency Investment Realty
Trust, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Daniel Norensberg, Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.



By:  /s/ Daniel Norensberg
   ---------------------------------------------
     Daniel Norensberg
     Chief Financial Officer
     (principal financial and accounting officer)
     Dated this 19th day of November, 2007
IN RE: Charles Everette HINTON

449P11-21

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 2018

Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

*641The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of October 2018 by Plaintiff for Trial by Jury and Separate Trials:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of October 2018."

Ervin, J. recused