alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mondial  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a)  or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  November 9, 2006


/s/ Scott Taylor
---------------------------------------
Scott Taylor
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Infosys Technologies Limited

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, T.V. Mohandas Pai, Chief Financial Officer and HeadFinance and Administration of Infosys Technologies Limited (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|i. | the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Annual Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ii. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 25, 2005



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    T.V. MOHANDAS
PAI                                   
|T.V. Mohandas Pai                                          
|Chief Financial Officer and HeadFinance and Administration
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron CELESTINE.

No. 2002-KP-2658.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Celestine, Byron;—Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial *1021Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 391-842; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-1862.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
In the MATTER OF the Appeal of: HIGHWATER SOLAR 1, LLC, Appellant

From the decision of the Wayne County Board of Equalization and Review1 to deny the partial exclusion of certain personal property for tax year 2016

No. COA18-396

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.

1 We note that the appeal to the North Carolina Property Tax Commission was from the decision of the Wayne County Board of Commissioners.

--------
STATE v. Edward M. ALONZO

288P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 7, 2018

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Alonzo, Edward M.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Ellen A. Newby, Assistant Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of September 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50147

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AURORA CARRIZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-368-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Aurora Carrizalez-Rodriguez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Carrizalez-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50147 Document: 00511761537 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2012
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

In the Interest of S.B., and C.B., children,

E.L., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees. No. 2D21-1571 September 29, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, Judge. Thomas J. Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina F. Moore and Laura J. Lee of Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee; and Jonathan W. Taylor of2

Moffa, Sutton & Donnini, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, SMITH, and STARGEL, J.J., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# Official Journal C 22/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 22 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6517 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 22

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6517 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 22/01 | Euro exchange rates — 14 January 2022 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 22/01

Euro exchange rates — 14 January 2022

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE v. Samuel Calleros ALVAREZ

299A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2019

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Alvarez, Samuel Calleros.

Anne Goco Kirby, M. Denise Stanford, Assistant Attorney Generals, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of February 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 13th day of March 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
<PAGE>

         AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of September 14, 1999, to WARRANT AGREEMENT
dated as of September 15, 1998 (the "Original Agreement") between Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Insignia/ESG
Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"), and APTS Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership ("APTS"), providing for the issuance of warrants to purchase 266,667
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation.

         WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain letter agreement dated the date
hereof, the Corporation and APTS desire to extend the Expiration Date (as
defined in the Original Agreement) of the Warrants provided for in the Original
Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Original
Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         2. The Expiration Date of the Warrants is hereby extended from May 1,
2000 to June 1, 2000.

         3. Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Original Agreement
is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

         4. Any Warrant Certificate evidencing Warrants need not be amended to
reflect the change in Expiration Date provided for herein in order to give full
effect to such change.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1
to the Original Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and
duly authorized officers, as of the date and year first above written.

                                 INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                 By: /s/ Andrew L. Farkas
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Andrew L. Farkas
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                 APTS PARTNERS, L.P.

                                 By: APTS GP Partners, L.P., its general partner
                                 By: APTS Acquisition Corporation, its general
                                       partner

                                 By: /s/ John R. S. Jacobsson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  John R. S. Jacobsson
                                     Title: Vice President
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #10207 and #10208]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated October 4, 2005. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Rita. *Incident Period:*
                         September 20, 2005. *Effective Date:*
                         October 4, 2005. 
                        ( print page 60597) *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         December 5, 2005. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         July 5, 2006.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth , TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Monroe Contiguous Counties: Florida Collier, Miami-Dade The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.557Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.750Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10207 8 and for economic injury is 10208 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 4, 2005. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 05-20726 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Matthew Leachman

Appellate case number: 01-22-00232-CR, 01-22-00233-CR, 01-22-00234-CR

Trial court case number: 1756174, 1756176, 1756173

Trial court: 248th District Court of Harris County

On March 25, 2022, Appellant Matthew Leachman filed notices of appeal of the trial 

court’s denial of his applications for writ of habeas corpus in the above-referenced cause

numbers. On August 11, 2022, Appellant filed a “Suggestion for Conditional Dismissal,”

explaining that he expected to be released on bail by the end of August and that his “research 

suggests that [his] actual release on bail will moot an appeal based entirely on [his] confinement

in lieu of bail.” Appellant requested that the Court “conditionally dismiss the appeal on [his] 

suggestion of impending mootness, and remove the case from the active docket, subject to 

reinstatement on motion of any party within 45 days.” On August 23, 2022, this Court abated 

the appeals for forty-five days to allow Appellant to determine whether his appeals are moot, 

given his impending release on bail.

On October 3, 2022, Appellant filed a “Motion to Extend Time for Filing Appellant 

Brief,” explaining that although his bail has been paid and he has been released, he believes there 

could still be an issue to appeal in these cases. Appellant seeks a thirty-day extension of time in 

which to file his brief in these appeals. 

We lift the abatement and return the cases to this Court’s active docket. Appellant’s 

motion is granted. Appellant’s brief is due thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: October 11, 2022
#### The CITY OF ARNOLD, Missouri, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Tina Bonfiglio, Plaintiff/Intervenor, v. Dale FREDEKING, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 81688.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 15, 2003.

C. John Pleban, Michael J. Schaller, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Rick Barry, Greg Kloeppel, St. Louis, for Intervenor/Bonfiglio.

Kenneth H. Rothman, S. Todd Hamby, Sanford J. Boxerman, Capes, Sokol, Goodman & Sarachan, P.C., St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dale Fredeking appeals from the trial court’s judgment on The City of Arnold’s (City) petition for damages and injunctive relief after a non-jury trial.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties,2 the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. *Piache v. Haggerty,*562 S.W.2d 743, 745 (Mo.App. E.D.1978); *Murphy v. Car-ron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our deci*851sion. The judgment is affirmed.3 Rule 84.16(b).

1

. City filed a two-count petition against Fre-deking, Count I for conversion and Count II for a permanent injunction. The trial court granted a motion to sever trial on Counts I and II. The trial court entered judgment in favor of City on Count II and issued a permanent injunction. Although the judgment on Count II does not resolve all the claims and issues between the parties, the trial court's amended judgment expressly designates "there is no just reason for delay;” thus, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. ■ *O'Neill v. O’Neill,*864 S.W.2d 7, 8 (Mo.App. E.D.1993).

2

. The trial court granted a Motion to Intervene by Police Officer Tina Bonfiglio in the proceedings below. Bonfiglio also filed a brief on appeal, essentially supporting City’s position.

3

. City’s Motion for Sanctions is hereby denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Private Media Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the annual period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Charles Prast, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan
Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Charles Prast
------------------------------
Charles Prast
Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2003

/s/ Johan Gillborg
------------------------------
Johan Gillborg
Chief Financial Officer

March 28, 2003

     This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78409) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-92889) pertaining to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 30, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of CompuCredit Corporation and subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                     /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2001
##### 



Exhibit 31.02 Pharma Services Intermediate Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John D. Ratliff, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharma Services
Intermediate Holding Corp.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.](c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




---



##### 



(a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:
    
    May 13, 2005/s/ John D. RatliffJohn D. RatliffChief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4917 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

mid-year changes in the formularies of Medicare Part D plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2010 

Mr. SCHAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to prohibit mid-year changes in the formularies of 

Medicare Part D plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO MID-YEAR FORMULARY CHANGES PER4 MITTED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4(b)(3)(E) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(b)(3)(E)) is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘and only at the beginning of a plan 

8 year’’ before the period. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4917 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to plan years begin3 ning on or after January 1, 2011. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS