alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Library of Medicine, October 25, 2005, 9 a.m. to October 25, 2005, 5 p.m., National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 16, 2005, 70 FR 48166.                

In addition to the October 25, 2005 meeting, there will be a meeting on October 24, 2005 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: October 3, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20430 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JASPER WASHINGTON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 89 EM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of September, 2015, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is** DENIED

**.**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7078

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT DEMETRIUS BARNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:02-cr-00105-WMN; 1:07-cv-00960-WMN)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 19, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Demetrius Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Demetrius Barnes seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as

untimely and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barnes has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Toni TURNAGE

No. 181P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Katherine Whitney Dickinson-Schultz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Turnage, Toni.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of June 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of June 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of June 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-57103) of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. of our report 
dated February 23, 1999, appearing in this Form 10-K.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on 
Form 10-K of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1998 of 
our report dated February 26, 1998 included in its Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 (No. 333-57103) dated September 25, 1998 relating to the financial 
statements and financial statement schedule for the three years ended 
December 31, 1997.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 3, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP
Solar Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Sheldon Reinhart, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sheldon Reinhart---------------------------------- 
Sheldon Reinhart 
Principal Accounting Officer 
September 15, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
The STATE v. T. M. H.

A16A1357

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

January 25, 2019

Paul L. Howard Jr., Atlanta, Kevin Christopher Armstrong, for Appellant.

Brandon Alexander Bullard, Charles E. Rooks, Atlanta, for Appellee.

Doyle, Presiding Judge.

In *State v. Hudson* ,1 the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed in part this Court's opinion in *State v. T. M. H* .2 Accordingly, we vacate *569our prior opinion, and we adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.3

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

Barnes, P. J., Miller, P. J., McFadden, P. J., McMillian, Rickman, Goss, Brown and Markle, JJ., concur.

1

303 Ga. 348, 812 S.E.2d 270 (2018).

2

339 Ga. App. 628, 794 S.E.2d 201 (2016).

3

See *Hudson* , 303 Ga. at 350 n.3, 812 S.E.2d 270.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker Permit

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker permits are cancelled without prejudice.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Name                                Permit No.                          Issuing port
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aries International Import Services...  05-026                               Washington, DC.
Action International, Inc.............  18-0139                              Tampa.
Michael A. Marks dba Straight Forward.  11120-P                              San Francisco.
Panalpina, Inc........................  18-03-554..........................  Tampa.
Lois B. Sproul........................  17-03-AWG..........................  Atlanta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: September 26, 2005.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-19767 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-06-P 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

d0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137000 & (85) 

 

BRIAN EBBERS, JEFF STEINPORT, 

and KAREN NEAL, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 137000 

 COA: 283782 

Kent CC: 08-000699-CZ 

SECRETARY OF STATE, ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, and KENT COUNTY 

PROSECUTOR, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

STATE REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT DEAN, 

Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 3.2  [strikeforce10q093010ex32001.jpg]   [strikeforce10q093010ex32002.jpg]  2   [strikeforce10q093010ex32003.jpg]  3   [strikeforce10q093010ex32004.jpg]  4   [strikeforce10q093010ex32005.jpg]  5   [strikeforce10q093010ex32006.jpg]  6   [strikeforce10q093010ex32007.jpg]  7   [strikeforce10q093010ex32008.jpg]  8   [strikeforce10q093010ex32009.jpg]  9   [strikeforce10q093010ex32010.jpg]  10   [strikeforce10q093010ex32011.jpg]  11   [strikeforce10q093010ex32012.jpg]  12   [strikeforce10q093010ex32013.jpg]  13   [strikeforce10q093010ex32014.jpg]  14   [strikeforce10q093010ex32015.jpg]  15   [strikeforce10q093010ex32016.jpg]  16   [strikeforce10q093010ex32017.jpg]  17   [strikeforce10q093010ex32018.jpg]  18   [strikeforce10q093010ex32019.jpg]  19   [strikeforce10q093010ex32020.jpg]  20   [strikeforce10q093010ex32021.jpg]  21   [strikeforce10q093010ex32022.jpg]  22
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20014]



[[Page 58224]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               License No.                         Name/address                       Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001833F.................................  Commodity Forwarders, Inc.,    September 5, 2005.
                                           11101 South La Cienega
                                           Blvd., Los Angeles, CA
                                           90045..
003296F.................................  Consuelo E. Kelly dba, Kelly   August 26, 2005.
                                           International, 10257
                                           Switzer, Overland Park, KS
                                           66212..
017663N.................................  Data Cargo Co., Inc., 8757 NW  February 12, 2005.
                                           35 lane, Miami, FL 33172..
018332N.................................  Pioneer Logistics, Inc., 2300  August 25, 2005.
                                           Higgins Road, Suite 204, Elk
                                           Grove Village, IL 60007..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-20014 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

                                  Certification
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of State of Franklin
Bancshares,  Inc. I, Charles E. Allen, Jr., Chief Executive  Officer  (principal
executive,  accounting and financial  officer) of State of Franklin  Bancshares,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of State of
     Franklin Bancshares, Inc.



Date:  March 31, 2003                        /s/ Charles E. Allen, Jr.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Charles E. Allen, Jr.
                                             Chief Executive Officer (principal
                                             executive, accounting and financial
                                             officer)
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| 1. | To                the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To                the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of the Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                      |                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                             | /s/ Dengyong                  Jin |
|   | Dengyong                    JinChief                    Executive Officer |

|   |                                                                         |                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                | /s/                    Donghai Yu |
|   | Donghai                      Yu Chief                      Financial Officer |

----
#### HENREDON FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

No. 7525SC496

(Filed 5 November 1975)

Rules of Civil Procedure § 20— insurer as proper party — joinder discretionary

An insurer who has paid part of an insured’s claim is a proper and not a necessary party to an action brought by insured against tortfeasor, and the addition of parties where they are not necessary is a discretionary matter for the trial court.

Appeal by defendant from *Ferrell, Judge.*Order entered 19 March 1975 in Superior Court, Burke County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 25 September 1975.

Plaintiff filed complaint alleging that its tractor-trailer unit was being driven over defendant’s railroad crossing at the direction of defendant’s signalman when it was struck by a boxcar. Defendant answered denying negligence and alleging contributory negligence. Defendant counterclaimed alleging that plaintiff’s driver did not heed their signals for him to stop. Defendant also moved for joinder of American Mutual Insurance Company as a party plaintiff alleging that it was the real party in interest since it had paid all of plaintiff’s damages except a $1,000 deductible. Plaintiff replied to the counterclaim and prayed that American Mutual not be joined.

From an order finding that American Mutual was a proper party but not a necessary party and denying defendant’s motion to join American Mutual, defendant appealed.

*332
      *Hedrick, McKnight, Parham, Helms, Kellam & Feeriek, by Richard T. Feeriek and Edward L. Eatman, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.*

*W. T. Joyner and John H. McMurray for defendant appellant.*

ARNOLD, Judge.

North Carolina case law provides that, although an insurer who has paid part of insured’s claim “has a direct and appreciable interest in the subject matter of the action” brought by-insured against tortfeasor, *Burgess v. Trevathan,*236 N.C. 157, 161, 72 S.E. 2d 231, 234 (1952), the insurer is not a necessary party to the action, but only a proper party. *New v. Public Service Co.,*270 N.C. 137, 153 S.E. 2d 870 (1967) ; *University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.,*266 N.C. 251, 146 S.E. 2d 102 (1966) ; *Burgess v. Trevathan, supra.*The addition of parties where they are not necessary is a matter within the trial court’s discretion, and the judge’s order refusing to join additional parties is not ordinarily reviewable. *New v. Service Co., supra; Corbett v. Corbett,*249 N.C. 585, 107 S.E. 2d 165 (1959) ; *Guthrie v. City of Durham,*168 N.C. 573, 84 S.E. 859 (1915). Defendant has not shown how the interlocutory order appealed from deprives it of any “substantial right.” G.S. 1-277. *See Funderburk v. Justice,*25 N.C. App. 655, 214 S.E. 2d 310 (1975). Therefore, this appeal is premature and is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Keithan D. WHITMIRE

No. COA18-308

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BREON POWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 280 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4617 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4617

  To condition the eligiblity of disabled children aged 16 or 17 for 
      supplemental security income benefits on school attendance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2014

   Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mrs. 
Black, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, and Mr. Young of Indiana) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To condition the eligiblity of disabled children aged 16 or 17 for 
      supplemental security income benefits on school attendance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Attendance Improves Lives Act 
of 2014''.

SEC. 2. SSI BENEFITS FOR DISABLED CHILDREN AGED 16 OR 17 CONDITIONED ON 
              SCHOOL ATTENDANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1614(a)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)(C)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(iii) Notwithstanding clause (i) of this subparagraph, an 
individual who has attained 16 years of age but not 18 years of age 
shall not be considered an eligible individual for purposes of this 
title unless the individual is a full-time elementary or secondary 
school student (within the meaning of section 202(d)(7) and the 
regulations promulgated under such section), except where the 
Commissioner determines that the individual has good medical cause, 
corroborated by a treating physician, to not attend school for part or 
all of a month.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to benefits payable for calendar months beginning after the 6-
month period that begins with the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
MARTIN v. SLAGEL

210P16-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 27, 2018

Michael T. Wood, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorneys General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Dale P. Martin, for Martin, Dale Patrick

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of November 2018 by Petitioner to Rebut Answer Response to Habeas Corpus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of November 2018."