alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mohamed L. SAHN, Marvet Abd El Nour, and Rocky Investments of FLorida, Inc., Appellants, v. Barry MANKES and Cecile Mankes, Appellees.

No. 3D02-446.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 6, 2003.

Levey, Airan, Brownstein, Shevin, Friedman, Roen & Kelso, and John R. Kelso, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene & Buchsbaum, and Robert I. Buchsbaum (Hollywood), for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Roseman v. Town Square Ass'n,*810 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); *Amador v. Amador,*796 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
#### In the Interest of D.F., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.F. (Natural Mother), Appellant, John Doe (Putative Father), Defendant, E.F. (Putative Father), Defendant.

No. WD 62106.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 12, 2003.

Joseph M. Backer, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Melissa Stanosheck, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.

Jill M. Katz, Kansas City, MO, for plaintiff.

Kenneth J. Berra, Kansas City, MO, for defendant E.F.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., SPINDEN and HOWARD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

B.F. (Mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, D.F., pursuant to § 211.447.2(1), § 211.447.4(2), and § 211.447.4(3), RSMo 2000. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

*897The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
In the MATTER OF Frank Barnwell MCMASTER, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001225

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 21, 2018

**557ORDER

By opinion dated January 11, 2017, this Court suspended petitioner from the practice of law for thirty months, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension.1

**558*In the Matter of McMaster* , 419 S.C. 37, 795 S.E.2d 853 (2017). Petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules. After referral to the Committee on Character and Fitness (the Committee), the Committee has filed a report and recommendation recommending the Court reinstate petitioner to the practice of law.

We find petitioner has met the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE. Accordingly, we grant the petition for reinstatement upon the conditions that petitioner (1) continue his treatment and sobriety; (2) follow all requests and recommendations of Lawyers Helping Lawyers, including appropriate monitoring for depression and anxiety; and (3) continue to renew his two-year monitoring contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers and file annual reports of his contract compliance with the Commission on Lawyer Conduct for as long as he remains a member of *419the South Carolina Bar or until such time as Lawyers Helping Lawyers finds monitoring no longer necessary.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*, C.J.

*/s/ John W. Kittredge*, J.

*/s/ Kaye G. Hearn*, J.

*/s/ John Cannon Few*, J.

*/s/ George C. James, Jr.*, J.

1

Petitioner was placed on interim suspension on March 4, 2014. *In the Matter of McMaster* , 407 S.C. 213, 755 S.E.2d 107 (2014).
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201 700375

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### MARVIN A. GRANT Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ) , U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ App eal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC

. Convening Authority: Command ing General, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Colonel R.A. F ifer, USMC. For Appellant: Lieutenant C olonel Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 3 May 2018

____________________ _____ Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON and G ERDING , Appellate Military Ju dges

______________

___________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William H. Roj, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO InternationalCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 3, 2004 By: /s/ William H. Roj    Name: William H. Roj Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Vardakis, President and Treasurer, of Syntony Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Quarterly Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.

Dated: November 14, 2005             Signature:/s/Michael Vardakis
                                     Michael Vardakis
                                     President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Sun River Energy, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Judson F. Hoover, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 22, 2011


/s/ Judson F Hoover



Judson F Hoover,Chief Financial Officer,
SCWC-19-0000610

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I 

________________________________________________________________ 

NB, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

GT, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000610, FC-D NO. 12-01-056K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins 

JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant NB’s application for writ of 

certiorari filed on November 3, 2020, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, December 14, 2020. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000610

14-DEC-2020

08:50 AM

Dkt. 16 ODAC
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David M. KIRSCH.

No. 2003-K-0238.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Kirsch, David M.;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 312,236; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 KA 0993.

Denied.
Ex 10(c)1 q1 2013 10-Q






Exhibit 10(c)1




BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2013, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Georgia Power Company and certain other executive officers of Georgia Power Company who served during 2012.




	
			
	W. Paul Bowers
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$764,406
	 

	Ronnie R. Labrato*
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
	$307,114
	 

	Joseph A. Miller
Executive Vice President
	$415,158
	 

	John L. Pemberton
Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer
	$309,344
	 

	Anthony L. Wilson
Executive Vice President
	$336,444
	 






*Retired March 31, 2013
Ex 4.11


		
			EXHIBIT 4.11
		

		
			Granite Hill Capital Ventures, LLC
		

		
			401 El Cerrito Avenue
		

		
			Hillsborough, CA 94010
		

		
			(650) 348-2716
		

		
			 
		

		
			March 12th, 2013
		

		
			 
		

		
			Howard Montgomery, CEO and Chairman
		

		
			Calpian Inc. 
		

		
			500 N. Akard, Suite 2850
		

		
			Dallas, Texas 75201
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter outlines conditions and agreements between Calpian, Inc. (“Calpian”) and Granite Hill Capital Ventures, LLC (“GHCV”), and references the Loan and Security Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated November 9th, 2012.
		

		
			Calpian agrees to include as many provisions below in an amendment to the Agreement no later than March 31st, 2013, without in any way prejudicing the validity and enforceability of the items below:
		

			
			
				 1.
			

			
			
			Any funds earned or originating from operating cash flow, including but not limited to credit card residuals, can only be used for operating expenses, interest payments to senior and subordinated debt, and amortization of senior debt.




			
			
				 2.
			

			
			
			Explicitly, no maturing subordinated debt principal can be paid down without GHCV approval




			
			
				 3.
			

			
			
			Sameet Mehta will be placed as a signatory, through becoming an officer of Calpian or other means, to processor accounts. 




			
			
				 4.
			

			
			
			A warrant will be issued to GHCV of 500,000 shares at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, expiring 03/31/2018. This warrant will be issued by 3/31/2013. This warrant will be cancelled if one of the following two conditions are met




			
			
				 a.
			

			
			
			$3.0 million or more in equity financing is raised by 3/31/2014




			
			
				 b.
			

			
			
			All subordinated debt are either converted to equity or mature the later of 12/31/2016 or the maturity date of the senior debt and $1.0 million in equity financing is raised by 3/31/2014




			
			
				 5.
			

			
			
			If average attrition for Pipeline Data residuals during Q2 2014, which is April to July, or during Q3 2014 which is July to October is 1.4% or higher, then the amount of equity to be raised in 3(b) above will be $1.5 million




			
			
				 6.
			

			
			
			It will be mutually understood that additional draws on senior debt capital would only be towards accretive acquisitions of residuals cash flows.




		
			 
		

		
			Agreed and signed:
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						/s/ Harold Montgomery

					
					
						 

					
					
						/s/ Sameet S. Mehta

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Harold Montgomery

					
					
						 

					
					
						Shailesh J. Mehta, CEO, GHCV LLC

				
	
					
						CEO and Chairman, Calpian, Inc.

					
					
						 

					
					
						Sameet S. Mehta as Attorney –in-fact
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 30, 2012

p0123 

# Order

January 30, 2012

143873

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143873 COA: 305012 Kent CC: 10-001487-FC RAHEIM JAMAR REID, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.3

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P., hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Regency Centers, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2010                                                                 
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                             
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                 
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Carl Dean KNOX, Appellant.

No. 20681.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 29, 1972.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1972.

*1025Philip R. Newmark, St. Louis, Mo., David H. Goldenhersh, Goldenhersh & Goldenhersh, East St. Louis, 111., for appellant.

William C. Martin, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Daniel Bartlett, Jr., U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Carl Dean Knox was charged in separate indictments with having robbed a St. Louis bank and having attempted a second robbery of the same bank. The offenses alleged constitute separate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The charges were consolidated for trial, pursuant to Rule 8(a), F.R.Cr.P., 18 U.S.C., and over the objection of defense counsel. A jury found Knox not guilty of the initial robbery and guilty of the subsequent attempted robbery. Knox has appealed from the judgment of conviction.

Apparently, the court reporter’s trial tapes or notes were lost after trial and prior to transcription, rendering unavailable a transcript of the district court proceedings. This court entered an order, pursuant to Rule 10(c), F.R.App.P., 28 U.S.C., directing the parties to prepare an agreed narrative record. A proposed substitute record was submitted by defense counsel to the Assistant United States Attorney, and several alterations suggested by the prosecutor were incorporated by the district court before certification of the record to this court. Knox appealed to this court for leave to amend the certified record. The matter was remanded for a hearing in the district court, but, after that hearing, the district court denied the motion.

The appeal is before us now on its merits. Appellant alleges that he was denied a fair trial because joinder of the charges against him resulted in prejudicial confusion of the jury and that he has been denied a fair appeal because of the unavailability of a trial transcript.

Because of the peculiar facts of this case, we find merit in appellant’s second contention. An actual transcript would be essential to proper review by this court of the proceedings which culminated in the conviction here challenged. Such a transcript is not available; therefore, we believe that in the interests of justice the cause should be remanded to the district court for another trial.

Our decision renders consideration of appellant’s misjoinder argument unnecessary.

The judgment of conviction is vacated and the cause is remanded.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d -14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael D. Lohner, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the Registrant and have:  a)

    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on
such evaluation;c)
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 23, 2005 /s/ MICHAEL D. LOHNERMichael D. LohnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           JONES MEIDA NETWORKS, LTD.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     All of the companies listed below are Colorado corporations, unless
otherwise indicated.


Great American Country, Inc.
JPN, Inc.
Jones Audio Services, Inc.
Jones Direct, Ltd.
Jones Broadcast Programming, Inc.
Jones Earth Segment, Inc.
Jones Galactic Radio, Inc.
Jones Galactic Radio Partners, Inc.
Jones Infomercial Networks, Inc.
Jones Infomercial Network Ventures, Inc.
Jones Infomercials International, Ltd.
Jones MAI Radio, Inc.
Jones MatchMedia, Inc.
Jones/Owens Radio Programming LLC
Jones Radio Holdings, Inc.
Jones Radio Network, Inc.
Jones Radio Network Ventures, Inc.
Jones Space Holdings, Inc.
Jones MediaAmerica, Inc., a New York corporation
Product Information Network Venture, a Colorado joint venture