alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NAIQIANG HE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70365

Agency No. A088-785-255

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Naiqiang He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAR 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-70365

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.

2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination

because He claimed that his father’s death in 2005 motivated him to start a family

in violation of China’s family planning laws, but He’s testimony and declaration

were inconsistent with his household registration and asylum application regarding

whether his father had passed away. See id. at 1046-47 (“Although inconsistencies

no longer need to go to the heart of the petitioner’s claim, when an inconsistency is

at the heart of the claim it doubtless is of great weight.”). Further, the agency was

not compelled to accept He’s explanations for these discrepancies. See Zamanov v.

Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible testimony,

He’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348

F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of He’s CAT

claim because he failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if

returned to China. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PATRICIA DAGAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4828

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; James A. Yancey, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, and

Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney

General, Tampa (substituted as counsel

of record after brief was filed), for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4872 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                        March 25, 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4872) entitled ``An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to Title 
II of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010 (S. 
Con. Res. 13).'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 118, strike lines 15 through 25 (and redesignate subsequent 
subsections accordingly).

(2)On page 120, strike lines 3 through 5.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 4872

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin Segaul Lebowitz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



/s/ Robin Segaul Lebowitz
-------------------------
Robin Segaul Lebowitz
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Order entered March 30, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00011 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 0001 2 - CR SEBASTIAN CARLOS ROM AN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 397 th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 071029 Ct 1 & Ct 2

O RDER On the Court ’ s own motion, we CONSOLIDATE these appeals. W e DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from 05

- 20

- 00012

- CR int o appellate cause number 05

- 20

- 0 0 011

- C R . For administrative purposes, 05

- 20

- 00012

- CR shall be treated as a closed case. The parties shall now us e only cause number 05

- 20

- 00011

- CR when referencing the appeal. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of WPT Entertainment, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lyle
Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ Lyle BermanLyle BermanChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2011





/s/ Michael S. EganMichael S. EganChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.2










ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF 


FORFEITURE OF SHARES AND WARRANTS


 


May 21, 2013


 


Reference is hereby
made to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of the date hereof, by and among Blue Wolf
Mongolia Holdings Corp., a British Virgin Islands business company (the “Company”), Blue Wolf Acquisition Sub,
Inc, a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and Li3 Energy, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (“Li3”) (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”).


 


In order to induce
Li3 to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and in the
Merger Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned hereby acknowledges and agrees as follows:


 


1.          Capitalized
terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement.


 


2.          At
the Effective Time, One Million Six Hundred Ten Thousand (1,610,000) Ordinary Shares (the “Forfeiture Shares”)
issued to Blue Wolf MHC Ltd. (the “Sponsor”) shall be canceled without any further consideration. The remaining
Four Hundred Two Thousand Five Hundred (402,500) Ordinary Shares owned by the Sponsor subsequent to the Closing shall not be subject
to any forfeiture provisions currently in effect.


 


3.          On
or prior to the Closing, the Company and the Sponsor shall, subject only to paragraph 6 hereof, irrevocably direct Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company to cancel the Forfeiture Shares effective as of the Effective Time.


 


4.          At
the Effective Time, warrants to purchase Three Million Three Hundred Thirty Three Thousand and Three Hundred Thirty Three (3,333,333)
Ordinary Shares (the “Forfeiture Warrants”) issued to the Sponsor shall be canceled without any further consideration.
The Sponsor will retain warrants to purchase Eight Hundred Thirty Three Thousand and Three Hundred Thirty Four (833,334) Ordinary
Shares.


 


5.          On
or prior to the Closing, the Company and the Sponsor shall, subject only to paragraph 6 hereof, irrevocably direct Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company to cancel the Forfeiture Warrants effective as of the Effective Time.


 


6.          Solely
in the event the Closing is not consummated, this Acknowledgement of Forfeiture of Shares and Warrants shall be void and of no
further force and effect, and the Forfeiture Shares and the Forfeiture Warrants issued shall not be canceled, and the Company and
the Sponsor shall direct Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company to that effect.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Acknowledgement
as of the date first written above.


 


	 	BLUE WOLF MHC LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lee Kraus
	 	 	Name:  Lee Kraus
	 	 	Title:  Director


 


Acknowledged and agreed:


 


BLUE WOLF MONGOLIA HOLDINGS CORP.

  


	By:	/s/ Lee Kraus	 
	 	Name:  Lee Kraus	 
	 	Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Jonathan E. BRUNSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF the DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR the 12TH PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT, the Office of the Cumberland County Sheriff, North Carolina Department of Social Services, Office of the 12th Judiciary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, and the State of North Carolina, Defendants.

No. COA18-570

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

DISMISSED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ FINISAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

NISTICA, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2017

- 1649

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:13

- cv

- 03345

- BLF, Judge Beth Labson Freeman.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID C. R ADULESCU , Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by R OBIN M. D AVIS , D ANIEL K ESACK , E TAI L AHAV , T IGRAN V

ARDANIAN

.

R OBERT K RAMER , Dentons US LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by J ENNIFER D. B ENNETT , R USSELL T ONKOVICH , San Franci sco, CA; L ORA A. B RZEZYNSKI , Washington, DC; R ICHARD S ALGADO , Dallas, TX.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , W ALLACH , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00149

- CV

In re Angela King

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

___ ____________________ ___________________

Darlene B yrne

, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: April 23, 202 4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 28, 2018

No. 04-18-00852-CV

IN RE ANDERSON COLUMBIA CO., INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Real Parties in Interest’s Motion to Extend Time to File Response is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 6, 2018. 

It is so ORDERED on November, 2018.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15-03-31056-MCV, styled Jerold Givens, et al. v. Salatiel Polanco, et al., 

pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Gloria Saldana presiding.
Robert and Patricia /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00083

- CV

Mike and Geri JONES

, Appellant s

v.

Robert and Patricia ZEARFOSS

, Appellee s

From the 25th Judic ial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 00986

- CV

- A Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Unopposed Motion f or Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The appellee ’ s brief is due on September 5, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, DOD.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(C)(4).

                    The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service                           ( print page 59321)                        performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance bonuses to the Director, DFAS.                

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         November 9, 2005.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jerry Hovey, DFAS SES Program Manager, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington, Virginia, (863) 815-3709.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(C)(4), the following executives are appointed to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service PRB: Brigadier General Jan Eakle, Patrick T. Shine, Leon J. Krushinski, Jerry S. Hinton, Kathleen D. Noe.

Executives listed will service a one-year renewable term, effective November 9, 2005.

Dated: October 4, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-20392 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
STATE v. Napier Sandford FULLER

378P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 22, 2019

Napier Sandford Fuller, for Fuller, Napier Sandford.

Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Blake M. Courlang, District Attorney, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*105The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of February 2019 by Defendant for an Emergency Injunction for ADA Title II Accommodations for a Court Appearance on 2/25/2019:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of February 2019."
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4922 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4922

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a section of that Act 
         relating to exportation or importation of natural gas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2010

Mr. McGovern (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Kennedy, and 
Mr. Langevin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a section of that Act 
         relating to exportation or importation of natural gas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPORTATION OR IMPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 311 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 
(Public Law 109-58; 119 Stat. 685) is repealed.
    (b) Application.--The Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717 et seq.) shall 
be applied and administered as if section 311 of the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 (and the amendments made by the section) had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in this  Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of AKI,  Inc. (a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of AKI Holding
Corp.) and  Subsidiaries  of our report dated July 31, 1999,  except for Note 18
which is as of  September  15,  1999,  relating  to the  consolidated  financial
statements which appears in AKI, Inc. (a wholly-owned  subsidiary of AKI Holding
Corp.) and Subsidiaries'  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
September 28, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6080

LARRY L. DUPONT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA00-1007-S)

Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Dupont, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry L. Dupont seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Dupont v. Kupec, No. CA-00-1007-

S (D. Md. Dec. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 8.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF BRASIL TELECOM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.

Subsidiaries of Brasil
Telecom Participações S.A.

|Name of Subsidiary                           | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                                             |                              
|Nova Tarrafa Inc.                            | Brazil                       
|Nova Tarrafa
        Participações
    Ltda. | Brazil                       
|Brasil Telecom S.A.                          | Brazil                       
|Internet Group Limited                       | Brazil                       
|BrT Serviços
    de Internet S.A.            | Brazil                       
|14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A.               | Brazil                       
|Vant Telecomunicações
    S.A.               | Brazil                       
|MTH Ventures do Brasil Ltda.                 | Brazil                       
|Br.T. Cabos Submarinos (Holdings) Ltda.      | Brazil                       
|Br.T. Cabos Submarinos Ltda.                 | Brazil                       
|Br.T. Cabos Submarinos (Bermuda) Ltda.       | Bermuda                      
|Brasil Telecom of America Inc.               | United States                
|Brasil Telecom de Venezuela S.A.             | Venezuela                    
|iBest Holding Corporation                    | Brazil                       
|Opinia Cayman                                | Grand Cayman                 
|Opinia S.A.                                  | Brazil                       
|Lokau Méx                                    | Mexico                       
|iBest S.A.                                   | Brazil                       
|MailBR Ltda.                                 | Brazil                       
|iBest Espanha                                | Spain                        
|iBest México                                 | Mexico