alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20351 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EARL ST. ELMO BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. CR-H-95-63-1)

- - - - - - - - - - February 14, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Earl Stelmo Brown appeals his conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In

an intertwined argument, Br own contends that the district court

erred by denying his motion for a new trial without conducting an

evidentiary hearing and that he received ineffective assistance of

counsel. Our review of the record and of the arguments convinces

us that no reversible error was committed.2

As Brown does not show prejudice from his assertion that trial

counsel’s performance was deficient, his ineffective-assistance

claim is without merit. S ee Strickland v. Washington
, 466 U.S.

668, 687 (1984). Nor has Brown shown that the district court

abused its discretion by denying, without conducting an evidentiary

hearing, his motion for a new trial based on his claim of

ineffective-ass istance. S ee United States v. Blackburn
, 9 F.3d

353, 358 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Rontel Vincae ROYSTER

441A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 19, 2019

Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, For Royster, Rontel Vincae.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of March 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of March 2019."
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

t0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148182

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148182

COA: 316410

Kent CC: 12

- 006579

- FC

MICHAEL MALCOLM PIRANIAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gift Liquidators, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, David Mladen, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive and accounting officer) of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.



By:  /s/David Mladen
   ------------------------------------
     David Mladen
     Chief Executive Officer (principal
     executive and accounting officer)
     Dated this 23rd day of June, 2006
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.




Dated: June 25, 2010.




/s/ Gorica Adduci


Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of


Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4873 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the production 

period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2010 

Mr. CHANDLER (for himself, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. ROGERS of 

Kentucky, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, and Mr. YARMUTH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination 

of the production period for distilled spirits under section 

263A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN 

4 DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD 

5 FOR DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 

6 263A. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general exceptions) is 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4873 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(5) EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS

4 IN DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR

5 DISTILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this sub6 section, the production period for distilled spirits 

7 shall be determined without regard to any period al8 located to the natural aging process.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to production periods beginning 

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), AAF Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Konan Technology, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Korean Broadcasting System, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and Universitat Pompeau Fabra, Barcelona, Spain have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AAF Association, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 28, 2000, AAF Association, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 11, 2005 (70 FR 39796).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-20675 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Frank GLADNEY, III

No. 179P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Frank Gladney, III, for Gladney, Frank (III).

John Payne, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      Joseph Corrao, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.






*/s/
      Mark Joseph Corrao*


*Mark
      Joseph Corrao*


*Chief
      Financial Officer*




*November
      13, 2007*
EXHIBIT 13.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Telefônica Brasil S.A.  (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paulo Cesar Pereira Teixeira, General and Executive Officer and as interim Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 20, 2013By:
/s/ Paulo Cesar Pereira TeixeiraName:
Paulo Cesar Pereira TeixeiraTitle:
General and Executive Officer and as interim Chief Financial Officer, Control and Investor Relations Officer
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TORI LYNN CORDOVA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

) C.A. No. N22C-04-086 MMJ

)

JOEL MAEGO KIAGE and EMMA )

LOGISTICS, LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Submitted: January 12, 2024

Decided: January 22, 2024

On Prime Insurance Company’s Application for

Certification of Interlocutory Appeal

DENIED

1. On December 18, 2023, the Court denied Prime Insurance Company’s Motion 

to Intervene.

2. On January 2, 2024, Prime filed an Application for Certification of 

Interlocutory Appeal.

3. Supreme Court Rule 42(c)(i) provides that an application for certification of

interlocutory appeal “shall be served and filed within 10 days of the entry of the 

order from which the appeal is sought, or such longer time as the trial court, in its 

discretion, may order for good cause shown.”
4. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Application for Certification of Interlocutory 

Appeal of Prime Insurance Company was filed on January 12, 2024.

5. Rule 42(a) provides: “All time periods under this rule should be calculated 

under Supreme Court Rule 11.”

6. Supreme Court Rule 11 states: “When the period of time prescribed or allowed 

is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and other legal holidays shall 

be excluded in the computation.” The relevant period of time for filing an 

application is 10 days. Therefore, exclusion of intermediate days does not apply.

7. Strict compliance with Rule 42 is required by the Supreme Court. Julian v. 

State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).

8. Prime’s Application was filed 15 days after this Court’s December 18, 2023 

ruling.

THEREFORE, the Court finds that Prime Insurance Company’s Application for 

Certification of Interlocutory Appeal is hereby DENIED AS UNTIMELY. The 

Court further finds that Prime has failed to demonstrate good cause for its untimely 

filing.

SO ORDERED

Mary M. Johnston

Judge Mary M. Johnston
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-010-1020-PK; HAG 06-001]

Joint Meeting for the Southeast Oregon, John Day-Snake, and 
Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Councils (TRI RAC)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Lakeview District.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The TRI RAC will hold a joint meeting for all members on 
Monday November 7, 2005 from 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (PT) to 5 
p.m. Tuesday November 8, 2005. The meeting will begin at 7:30 a.m. and 
end about noon. The meeting is being held at the Running Y Ranch 
Resort, Conference Room, 5500 Running Y Road, Klamath Falls, Oregon 
97601. Meeting sessions are open to the public. A comment period is 
scheduled for 10:15 a.m. (PT) on Monday November 7, 2005. The meeting 
topics to be discussed include: New member orientation and video, a BLM 
and Forest Service update by the State Director and Regional Forester, 
Congressional updates, and a panel discussion on RAC involvement. 
Grazing regulations, the wild horse and burro program, and planning and 
implementation updates will follow. There will be a panel discussion on 
volunteerism and outside funding, stewardship contracting, proactive 
strategies and a RAC restructuring proposal. There may also be other 
issues that may come before the Councils.
    The Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council will hold a brief 
meeting Sunday November 6, 2005, at the Running Y Ranch Resort at 3 
p.m. (PT) in the Board Room. The John Day-Snake Resource Advisory 
Council will hold a brief meeting on Tuesday November 8, 2005 following 
the close of the TRI RAC meeting. These additional meetings will be to 
discuss the same issues and concerns that are scheduled for the TRI RAC 
meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
TRI RAC meeting may be obtained from Pam Talbott, contact 
representative, Lakeview Interagency Office, 1301 South G Street, 
Lakeview, Oregon 97630 (541) 947-6107, or [email protected].

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Shirley Gammon,
Lakeview District Manager.
[FR Doc. 05-20321 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
```
In the MATTER OF: J.N.M. and L.K.M.

No. COA18-470

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
theglobe.com, inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-36788, and 333-36144) on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-79677, 333-75503 and 333-67217)
on Form S-8 of theglobe.com, inc. of our report dated February 26, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of theglobe.com, inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of
theglobe.com, inc.

Our report dated February 26, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since
inception, that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 2, 2001
In the 

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit 

USCA11 Case: 23-11639     Document: 21-1     Date Filed: 12/20/2023     Page: 1 of 2 

USCA11 Case: 23-11639     Document: 21-1     Date Filed: 12/20/2023     Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, as Chief Financial Officer of Home Interiors &
Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the period ending December
31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 14, 2003
                                       /s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKI
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth J. Cichocki
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### S. PARISH OIL COMPANY, INC. and I.G. Petroleum LLC v. SLATER LAW FIRM (A Professional Corporation), W. Malcolm Stevenson and Kevin M. Wheeler.

No. 2003-C-1326.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Slater Law Firm (A. Professional Corporation); Stevenson, W. Malcolm; Wheeler, Kevin M.;—Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. K, No. 2001-11593; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-CA-1717.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Each of
the undersigned, David F. Carney, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (the “Company”), and Cesar Ribeiro,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2008 (the “Report”).




Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his respective knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
            November
      6, 2008








/s/DavidF.Carney


David F. Carney


Chairman
& Chief Executive Officer







/s/CesarRibeiro


Cesar Ribeiro


Chief
Financial Officer