alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 06-15-00070-CV

HERITAGE SNF D/B/A HERITAGE § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

PLAZA NURSING AND § 

REHABILITATION CENTER § 

§ 

PLAINTIFF § 

§ 

VS. § SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

§ 

GEORGE FISHER, INDIVIDUALLY § 

AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF § 

THE ESTATE OF WILMER GIDDENS § 

DECEASED § 

§ 

DEFENDANT § STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now Plaintiff Heritage SNF, LP d/b/a Heritage Plaza Nursing and Rehabilitation 

Center (“Plaintiff”) and moves to dismiss its appeal of this case and would show the court as 

follows: 

1. On June 25, 2015, the trial court, in case number 06-C1701-CCL, issued a 

judgment awarding Plaintiff damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and court costs but 

denying an award for attorneys’ fees. 

2. Less than thirty days from the date of judgment, Plaintiff filed a motion to modify 

the judgment to allow an award for attorneys’ fees, thereby extending the trial court’s plenary 

power to modify the judgment. See Tex. R. Civ. Pro. 329b (a), (e), (g). 

3. On September 23, 2015, the trial court had yet to rule on Plaintiff’s motion to

modify, and Plaintiff filed its notice of appeal to preserve an appeal. See Tex. R. App. Pro. 

26.1(a). 

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL PAGE 1 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00070-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

11/10/2015 10:48:53 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/10/2015 10:48:53 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
4. On October 5, 2015, the trial court, still having plenary power, issued an 

Amended Final Judgment, effectively modifying its original judgment to add an award for 

attorneys’ fees. 

5. Accordingly, there no longer being any need to appeal the trial court’s original 

judgment, Plaintiff hereby moves to dismiss its appeal. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David H. Estes__________________

DAVID H. ESTES

State Bar No. 24012599

destes@hdbdlaw.com

NEIL J. STOCKBRIDGE

State Bar No. 24088474

nstockbridge@hdbdlaw.com

HARTLINE DACUS BARGER DREYER LLP

8750 North Central Expressway, Suite 1600

Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 369-2100

(214) 369-2118 - Facsimile

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been 

forwarded to all known counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 

on this 10th day of November 2015.

/s/ David H. Estes__________________

DAVID H. ESTES

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL PAGE 2
Exhibit 13.01

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2008                    
|                                     
|/s/ Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa  
|Name: Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa
|Title: Chief Executive Officer       



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2008                
|                                 
|/s/ José Luís Magalhães Salazar  
|Name: José Luís Magalhães Salazar
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ─ Appellee,

v.

KEITH G. MARTIN, a/k/a Beach Boy,

Defendant ─ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (2:97-cr-00943-PMD-6)

Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith G. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett Dehart, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith G. Martin appeals the district court’s margin 

order denying his “Motion for Statement of Reasons” in his 

criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. United States v. Martin, No. 2:97-cr-00943-PMD-6

(Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
In connection with the quarterly report of ERICO International Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to such officer’sknowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.
Date: August 4, 2004      By: /s/ William H. Roj     Name: William H. Roj Title: Chief Executive Officer          By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber     Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber Title: Chief Financial Officer    
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
In the MATTER OF the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Jason Lindsey SMITH and Shannon Friday Smith Dated April 27, 2007 and Recorded in Book 4315 at Page 2450 in the Gaston County Public Registry, North Carolina.

Jason Lindsey Smith and Shannon Friday Smith, Plaintiffs, v. US Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2013 SC# Title Trust; Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC; Bank of America, N.A.; BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP; and Cornish Law, PLLC as Substitute Trustee, Defendants.

No. COA17-874

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 492 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 492

                   For the relief of Esther Karinge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2009

 Mr. Markey of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Esther Karinge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ESTHER KARINGE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Esther Karinge shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Esther Karinge enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Esther Karinge, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Esther 
Karinge shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Judith KEIFER, Employee/Respondent, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer/Appellant, and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.

No. ED 82335.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 22, 2003.

Peter Chung, Olivette, MO, for appellant.

Thomas J. Gregory, St. Louis, MO, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen, Caroline M.C. Bean, Asst. Atty. Gen, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J, WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, employer General Motors Corporation, appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming an award of permanent total disability, temporary total disability, past medical and future medical to the claimant, Judith Keifer, and finding no Second Injury Fund liability.

*870We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision.

The award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Excellency
Investment Realty Trust, Inc.




Dated: August 19, 2009




/s/ Gorica Adduci


Gorica Adduci, Chief Executive Officer of


Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlos SINCLAIR, Defendant.

No. COA18-293

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5206]


Determination Under Section 564 of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, Public Law 103-236, as 
Amended; Suspending Prohibitions on Certain Sales and Leases Under the 
Anti-Economic Discrimination Act of 1994

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the President by Section 564 of 
the Foreign Relations Authorization Act (``the Act''), Fiscal Years 
1994 and 1995, Public Law 103-236, as amended, which was delegated to 
the Secretary of State on April 24, 1997, I hearby determine that 
instituting the suspension of the application of Section 564(a) of the 
Act to Iraq and extending the suspension of the application of Section 
564(a) of the Act to the following eight countries until May 1, 2006 
will promote the objectives of section 564: Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, 
Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen.
    This determination will be reported to the appropriate committees 
of the Congress and published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 13, 2005.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.

    Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the 
Federal Register on October 11, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-20609 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
Christian G. PLASMAN, in his individual capacity and derivatively for the benefit of, on behalf of and right of nominal party Bolier & Company, LLC v. DECCA FURNITURE (USA), INC., Decca Contract Furniture, LLC, Richard Herbst, Wai Theng Tin, Tsang G. Hung, Decca Furniture, Ltd., Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC, Dongguan Decca Furniture Co. Ltd., Darren Hudgins, Decca Home, LLC, and Elan by Decca, LLC and Bolier & Company, LLC, Nominal Defendant v. Christian J. Plasman a/k/a Barrett Plasman, Third-Party Defendant

No. 1P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Matthew K. Rogers, Attorney at Law, Hickory, David S. Pokela, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Plasman, Christian G.

Robert A. Muckenfuss, Attorney at Law, Andrew D. Atkins, Attorney at Law, Jodie H. Lawson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine all aspects of professional military education operations; and provide such oversight and advice, as is necessary, to facilitate high educational standards and cost effective operations. The Board will be focusing primarily on the University's Command and Staff College, including its efforts to integrate Arabic language and culture into the curriculum for AY05/06. The Board will be apprised of recent developments at Marine Corps University, including progress on the construction efforts for the National Museum of the Marine Corps. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, November 3, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Marine Corps University in the Hooper Room. The address is: Marine Corps University, 2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Lanzillotta, Executive Secretary, Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134, telephone number 703-784-4037. 

Dated: October 4, 2005. 

I.C. Le Moyne Jr., 

Lieutenant,  Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,  Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-20564 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Manuel Alirio ACOSTA, Defendant.

No. COA17-1307

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. AFFIRMED IN PART.
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/            Walter Davis





Name:                    Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2010
**Exhibit 32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Infosmart Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Po Nei
      Sze, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/
                PO NEI SZE
              Po
                Nei Sze
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                  April
                    2, 2007




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael E. SULLIVAN.

No. 2002-KO-2965.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Sullivan, Michael E.;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 97-601; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 02-0360.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     6569
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             80432
<ALLOWANCES>                              (2734)
<INVENTORY>                               58273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         157540
<PP&E>                                   185077
<DEPRECIATION>                           (75471)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           322700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     74419
<BONDS>                                  202533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     40113
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      1
<OTHER-SE>                               239967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             322700
<SALES>                                  476355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         476355
<CGS>                                    367905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            367905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            964
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        47279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (11706)
<INCOME-TAX>                               8112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3594)
<DISCONTINUED>                             5550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                               1956
<EPS-BASIC>                               (6.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (6.17)



</TABLE>