alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Peter D. BARNA, Appellant, v. Angela C. BARNA, Appellee.

No. 4D02-3332.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 9, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 2003.

*604Stephen N. Martyak, Palm Beach Gardens, and Valentin Rodriguez of Valentin Rodriguez, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

SHAHOOD, J.

Appellant’s, Peter Barna, marriage was dissolved by final judgment entered on January 31, 2001. Pursuant to the final judgment, appellant was to pay child support and permanent alimony. Thereafter, he filed a “Motion for a Declaratory Judgment, Temporary Injunctive Relief, Permanent Injunctive Relief, Recusal and Certiorari Because the Postdissolution Permanent Spousal Support Provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 61 Violate the Florida Constitution.” Following a hearing, the court entered an order denying appellant’s motion and reserving jurisdiction to hear the former wife’s pending motion for attorney’s fees and costs. The court later granted the former wife’s motion for fees. That order is the subject of this appeal.

Appellant raises several issues on appeal. We affirm on all issues and write only to address the court’s award of fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes.

In the context of dissolution proceedings, appellant asserted his constitutional challenge to the alimony statutes. While appellant represented to the court that his actions did not require the former wife’s participation, the trial court found otherwise. In addition, the trial court found that appellant’s counsel’s attack on the alimony statutes was irrelevant, frivolous, and brought only to advance the cause of an unrelated client, the Alliance for Freedom from Alimony, Inc. As a result, the court awarded fees to the former wife for pursuing frivolous litigation brought without regard for the cost burden to the former wife.

Under section 57.105, Florida Statutes, the court may award fees to the prevailing party if at the time a claim or defense is presented to the court, the losing party knows or should know that it “[w]as not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense” or “[wjould not be supported by the application of then-existing law to those material facts.” § 57.105(l)(a),(b), Fla. Stat. (2002); *see also Read v. Taylor,*832 So.2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Based on the facts in this case, the trial court properly awarded fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes. *See, e.g., Morrone v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.,*664 So.2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(sua sponte awarding appellate fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes); *see also Smyth v. Smyth,*417 So.2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)(sua sponte awarding appellate fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes).

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4887 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4887

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 19), 2010

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that health 
 coverage provided by the Department of Defense is treated as minimal 
                          essential coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRICARE Affirmation Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEALTH COVERAGE AS MINIMAL 
              ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act, is amended--
            (1) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iv) medical coverage under chapter 55 of 
                        title 10, United States Code, including 
                        coverage under the TRICARE program;'';
            (2) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (v);
            (3) by striking the period at the end of clause (vi) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (4) by inserting after clause (vi) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(vii) the Nonappropriated Fund Health 
                        Benefits Program of the Department of Defense, 
                        established under section 349 of the National 
                        Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 
                        (Public Law 103-337; 10 U.S.C. 1587 note).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 1501(b) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act and shall be executed immediately after the 
amendments made by such section 1501(b).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Auburn Hills, Michigan

    We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of DaimlerChrysler
Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31,
2000 and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000. Such consolidated
financial statements are not included herein. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
financial statements of Chrysler Financial Company L.L.C. (a consolidated
subsidiary) for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, which statements
reflect total assets constituting 50% of consolidated total assets as of
December 31, 2000 and total revenues constituting 13% and 5% of consolidated
total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included
for Chrysler Financial Company L.L.C. for the years ended December 31, 2000 and
1999, is based solely on the report of such other auditors.

    We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of
other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, such
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of DaimlerChrysler Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

    The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, ACCOUNTING
FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES, on January 1, 2000, and
SFAS 138, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES--AN
AMENDMENT OF SFAS 133, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-20,
RECOGNITION OF INTEREST INCOME AND IMPAIRMENT ON PURCHASED AND RETAINED
BENEFICIAL INTERESTS IN SECURITIZED FINANCIAL ASSETS, on July 1, 2000.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan
February 8, 2001
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4765 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are 

pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study 

allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional 

offices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. WU, Mr. HALL of New 

York, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. 

PERRIELLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional offices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4765 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE TO 

2 INCLUDE CERTAIN OUTREACH SERVICES 

3 CONDUCTED THROUGH CONGRESSIONAL OF4 FICES. 

5 Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(G) The following activities carried out at the 

9 offices of Members of Congress for such Members: 

10 ‘‘(i) The distribution of information to 

11 members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and 

12 their dependents about the benefits and services 

13 under laws administered by the Secretary and 

14 other appropriate governmental and non-gov15 ernmental programs. 

16 ‘‘(ii) The preparation and processing of pa17 pers and other documents, including documents 

18 to assist in the preparation and presentation of 

19 claims for benefits under laws administered by 

20 the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Mission West  Properties,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year ended  December  31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
Carl E. Berg,  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer,  Raymond V.
Marino, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Wayne N. Pham, Vice President
of Finance and Controller of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company for the periods included in the Report.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
-------------------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2008

/s/ Raymond V. Marino
-------------------------------------------
Raymond V. Marino
President and Chief Operating Officer
March 13, 2008

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
-------------------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
March 13, 2008


This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Infosys TechnologiesLimited 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatement (No. 333-32196) on Form S-8 of Infosys Technologies Limited of our report dated April 14, 2005 except for Note 2.23, as to which the date is April 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Infosys Technologies Limitedand subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005 and the relatedfinancial statement schedule II, which report appears in the March 31, 2005 annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited. 

 

KPMG 

 

Bangalore, India 

April 25, 2005
Order entered May 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00052

- CV

KOZAMESA , INC., Appellant

V.

MERIDIAN MORTGAGE IN VESTORS FUND V , LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 10

- 15377



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 20, 2013 second motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. Appellant shall file its brief on or before June 10, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, B. Alva Schoomer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ B. Alva Schoomer



B. Alva Schoomer

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

September 14, 2005
#### In the Matter of Charles R. DEETS, III.

No. 79S00-0308-DI-384.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Sept. 8, 2003.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind Admission - and - Discipline - Rule 23(10)(f), petitions this Court to direct the respondent, Charles R. Deets, III, to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to respond to the Commission's demands for a response to grievances filed against him, which were sent to, and received by the respondent at his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent should be ordered to show cause to this Court why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Commission written responses to pending allegations of professional misconduct, received by the respondent at his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 23(10)(f), the respondent, Charles R. Deets, III, is hereby directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Disciplinary Commission written responses to pending allegations of misconduct requiring written responses and to respond to a subpoena duces tecum, all received by the respondent at his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to serve a certified copy of this order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to him personally, or by sending to him a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Should service not be obtained as outlined above, the Clerk of this Court is directed to complete service - pursuant - to - Admis.Disc.R. 23(12)(L).
## **Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Richard A. Lozyniak, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BlueRidge Paper Products Inc (the “registrant”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 15, 2005

 
|                                   | **/S/ RICHARD A. LOZYNIAK** |   |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Richard A.  Lozyniak                   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
---

|No. «CertNo» |  | U.S. «NumberAmt_»
|------------ |  | -----------------

COOL CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  (Incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota)

10% CONVERTIBLE NOTE 
  DUE DECEMBER 31, 2005

(BEING ONE OF A SERIES OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES
  APPROVED BY RESOLUTION
       OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY DATED DECEMBER
  31, 2002, 
  AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS (THE TERMS) THEREOF.)

FOR
  VALUE RECEIVED, COOL CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (herein referred to as the Company)
  promises to pay to

«INVESTOR_»
  «ADDRESS_»

or any subsequent registered holder hereof (the Holder),
  the principal sum of

«dollaramount»

on or prior to December 31, 2005 (the Maturity Date),
  and to pay interest on the principal sum outstanding on December 31 of each
  year commencing on December 31, 2002, at the rate of 10% per annum subject to
  adjustment for any part period in accordance with the Terms of this Note. Such
  interest shall be paid in United States currency or common shares in accordance
  with the Terms of this Note, to the person and at the address in whose name
  this Note is registered on the records of the Company regarding registration
  and transfers of the Notes (the Note Register) on the business day
  immediately preceding the payment date. The principal of this Note is payable,
  if converted in shares of Common Stock, or if not converted, in such coin or
  currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal
  tender for payment of public and private debts, to the person and at the address
  in whose name this Note is registered on the Note Register on the business day
  immediately preceding the payment date. The forwarding of such payment shall
  constitute a payment hereunder and shall satisfy and discharge the liability
  for principal on this Note to the extent of the sum or Common Shares so paid.

THIS
  NOTE is one of a duly authorized issue of Notes of the Company, designated as
  its 10% Convertible Notes due December 31, 2005 (the Notes).

THIS
  NOTE is subject to the terms and conditions established by Resolution of the
  Directors of the Company dated December 31, 2002 creating the series of Notes,
  which are incorporated herein by reference, and available for inspection at
  the head office of the Company at 311  698 Seymour Street, Vancouver,
  BC, Canada V6B 3K6.

IN
  WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be duly executed
  by an officer thereunto duly authorized.



COOL CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  By: _____________________________
           BRUCE LEITCH, President




---



---