alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Tamara A. Seymour, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this amendment to the report on Form 10-Q of Favrille, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date:January 17, 2008

 
|   | By:      |     | /s/  Tamara A. Seymour                      |   |
|--------|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |     |     | Tamara  A. Seymour                          |
|   |     |     | Chief  Financial Officer and                |
|   |     |     | Vice  President, Finance and Administration |
|   | * * | * * | *(Principal Financial Officer)*             |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Ridgewood Energy K
Fund, LLC;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Dated:       February 20, 2007

        /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
      Name:  Robert E. Swanson

     Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
             (Principal Executive Officer)
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Control Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Environmental Control Corp. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 16, 2011 |                                                                                   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                   |
|                | /s/ Albert E. Hickman                                                                  |
|                | Albert E. Hickman                                                                      |
|                | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |
|                | Environmental Control Corp.                                                            |
Exhibit
12.1  Certification
of the Chairman of the Board of Management
Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Prof. Jürgen E. Schrempp, certify that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of DaimlerChrysler AG;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The
companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the
effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this
report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The
companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  
   (b)Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: February 19, 2004   /s/  JÜRGEN E. SCHREMPPProf. Jürgen E. SchremppChairman of the Board of ManagementDaimlerChrysler AG
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board
of Directors of

Regency Centers Corporation,

the general partner of

Regency Centers, L.P.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-149856) on Form S3ASR and (No. 333-127274) on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P. of our reports
dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers, L.P. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in capital and comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers Corporation and Regency Centers, L.P.

Our report dated
February 26, 2010 refers to a change in the method of accounting for noncontrolling interests in 2009.

LOGO

February 26, 2010

Jacksonville, Florida

Certified Public Accountants
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2005N-0124]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Industry: Notification 
of a Health Claim or Nutrient Content Claim Based on an Authoritative 
Statement of a Scientific Body

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry: 
Notification of a Health Claim or Nutrient Content Claim Based on an 
Authoritative Statement of a Scientific Body'' has been approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 16, 2005 (70 
FR 35097), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0374. 
The approval expires on September 30, 2008. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: October 3, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20308 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1a1c0f0a0b0f000f02171d071d2e08030d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfbbbdaeabaaaea1aea3b6bca6bc8fa9a2ace1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Agreement No.: 011426-037.
    Title: West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: APL Co. Pte Ltd.; CMA CGM, S.A.; Compania Chilena de 
Navigacion Interoceanica, S.A.; Compania Sudamericana de Vapores, S.A.; 
Frontier Liner Services, Inc.; Hamburg-S[uuml]d KG; King Ocean Services 
Limited, Inc.; CP Ships USA LLC; Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A.; 
Seaboard Marine Ltd.; South Pacific Shipping Company, Ltd. (d/b/a 
Ecuadorian Line); and Trinity Shipping Line.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment makes changes in the manner in which the 
parties may confer and also clarifies the responsibilities for the 
payment of any civil penalties.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: October 7, 2005.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20522 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 21

Private Media Group, Inc. Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |                       
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Place of Incorporation
|Cine Craft, Ltd.                    |  | GIBRALTAR             
|Coldfair Holdings Limited           |  | CYPRUS                
|Fraserside Holdings Ltd.            |  | CYPRUS                
|Peach Entertainment Distribution AB |  | SWEDEN                
|Milcap Media Group S.L.             |  | SPAIN                 
|Private Media Group Services S.L.   |  | SPAIN                 
|Milcap Publishing Group Italy Srl   |  | ITALY                 
|Private Benelux B.V.                |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|Private France SAS                  |  | FRANCE                
|Private North America, Ltd.         |  | U.S. (California)     
|Barbuda B.V.                        |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|Ceresland S.L.                      |  | SPAIN                 
|Private Media Group Canada, Inc.    |  | CANADA                
|ThinkForward, Inc.                  |  | U.S. (California)     
|GreenCine, Inc.                     |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|Mamas LLC                          |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|GameLink LLC                        |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|eLine LLC                           |  | U.S. (Delaware)
#### Judith KOWALCZYK, Appellant, v. Donald R. HUNTER, et al., Appellees.

No. 5D02-2979.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 29, 2003.

Michael C. Huddleston of Huddleston & Teal, DeLand, for Appellant.

Tracy Raffles Gunn of Fowler White Boggs Banker P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Dennis Macade Myrick.

No Appearance for Appellee, Donald R. Hunter.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., and PLEUS, J., concur.

SHARP, W., J., concurs specially, with opinion.

SHARP, W., J.,

concurring specially.

Kowalczyk appeals from a summary judgment in favor of one of the defendants (Myrick) in her personal injury action. Kowalczyk was a passenger on Hunter’s motorcycle as they drove west on Interstate — 4. As Hunter came over a hill, he *963saw that all the traffic in front of him was stopped or coming to a stop due to an accident ahead. Hunter was unable to stop in time and hit Myrick’s vehicle in front of him. Kowalczyk was thrown from the motorcycle onto the pavement.

Kowalczyk sued both Hunter and Myr-ick for negligence. Myrick moved for summary judgment on the basis that Florida law presumes the rear driver is solely at fault in a rear-end collision. Kowalczyk countered that the presumption was overcome by the “sudden stop” exception. The trial court concluded the sudden stop was not the type of unexpected, unreasonable stop which allows the rear vehicle to overcome the presumption of negligence and entered summary judgment for Myrick.

I believe Kowalczyk should have the opportunity to establish *at trial*that Myrick was negligent and contributed in some degree to causing her injuries.1 Kowalczyk would have the burden of contradicting or rebuting the presumption of negligence on Hunter’s part. If she succeeded, the presumption would vanish, and the case would go to the jury on ordinary negligence principles. The presumption of negligence on the part of the rear driver should be interpreted in light of our present comparative fault system which allows the jury to apportion fault among the defendants.2

Nevertheless, I am bound to follow our *en banc*opinion in *Pierce v. Progressive American Ins. Co.,*582 So.2d 712 (Fla. 5th DCA), *rev. denied,*591 So.2d 188 (Fla.1991), *approved by Clampitt v. D.J. Spencer Sales,*786 So.2d 570 (Fla.2001). *Pierce*involved a similar “chain collision” accident. The majority held this type of sudden stop was insufficient to rebut the presumption the negligence of the rear driver was the sole proximate cause of the collision. Thus I reluctantly concur with the decision to affirm the summary judgment in favor of Myrick.

1

. Hypothetically, Kowalczyk might be able to establish that Myrick was also speeding and traveling too close to the car ahead of him, thereby requiring Myrick to stop so abruptly he contributed to some degree to Hunter’s inability to stop safely behind Myrick.

2

. § 768.81, Fla. Stat.
**Exhibit
      32.** **Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of**


**Atlantic
      Coast Federal Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002**





Robert
      J.
      Larison, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dawna R. Miller, Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation
      (the “Company”), each certify in his / her capacity as an officer of the Company
      that he /she has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and that to the best of his /her
      knowledge:





-
            the
                report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and-
            the
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
      1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      August 14, 2007


/s/
              Robert J.
              Larison, Jr.
            
            
            /s/
              Dawna R.
              MillerRobert
              J. Larison, Jr.
            
            
            Dawna
              R. MillerPresident
                and
              Chief Executive Officer
            
            
            Senior
                Vice President and
              Chief Financial
                Officer


35
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Burr D. Northrop,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





ENTECH
      ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By
/s/
      Burr D.
      Northrop


Burr
      D.
      Northrop


CEO


January
      14, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,428 & AP-76,429

EX PARTE TIMOTEO JESUS GARZA III, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 19376 & 19377 IN THE 336TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM FANNIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency

with a child and aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty and fifty years,

respectively. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because he failed to request a competency evaluation. The trial court has determined that trial

counsel was ineffective. Accordingly, relief is granted. The judgments of conviction in cause
2

numbers 19376 and 19377 in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County are set aside, and

Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Fannin County to answer the charges as set

out in the indictments.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 29, 2010

Do Not Publish
#### WILLIAMS, Darnell, Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana Respondent.

No. 45S00-0306-SD-248.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

July 22, 2003.

*ORDER*

Petitioner’s murder convictions and death sentence have been affirmed at each stage of review to which he is entitled as a matter of right, and the date for execution of the death sentence is set for August 1, 2003, before sunrise. Petitioner now files a “Petition For The Consideration Of New Evidence Pursuant To Indiana Code 35-50-2-9(K),” with various attachments.

The Court finds that additional briefing may be of assistance, and directs the State to respond to the petition. The State’s response shall be' subject to the form requirements specified in Appellate Rule 34(G), shall not exceed 5000 words, and shall be accompanied by a word count certificate in compliance with Rule 44(F). The response shall be physically on file with the Clerk no later than noon, July 24, 2003. To minimize any delay in the service and receipt of papers, the attorneys are ordered to certify in papers presented for filing that copies have been sent by fax or electronic mail to the other party’s attorney.

The Court will then take the matter under advisement.