alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             114                     121
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,191                   1,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,438                   2,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                           1,478                   1,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,930                  13,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,664                   6,494
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,238                   6,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,930                  13,163
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,589                   8,057
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,933                   7,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    90                     146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 297                     223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    265                     347
<INCOME-TAX>                                       120                     142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                145                     205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       145                     205
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20                     .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20                     .33


</TABLE>
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

271A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Jennifer T. Harrod, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Kiran H. Mehta, Attorney at Law, Molly Leigh McIntosh, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Duke Energy Progress, LLC.

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Duke Energy Progress, LLC.

Matthew D. Quinn, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Sierra Club.

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, Lucy E. Edmondson, Staff Attorney, Raleigh, for Public Staff-N.C. Utilities Commission.

James P. West, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fayetteville Public Works Commission.

Kyle J. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Department of Defense/Federal Executive Agencies.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 24th of August 2018 for Leave to File Documents Under Seal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
Honorable Zollis C. Steakley 

Secretary of State 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas. OPINION NO. W-38 

Re: 

Dear Sir: 

Deadline for filing application to appear on the 

official ballot at the 

Special Senatorial Election to be held April 2, 

1957. 

You have requested our official opinion on the question 

of the date of the deadline for filing an application to appear 

on the official ballot at the Special Senatorial Election for the 

office of United States Senator to be held April 2, 1957. 

Article 4.10 of the Texas Election Code provides with 

reference to the filing of the application: 

"Such application must be filed not later 

than thirty (30) days beftre any such 

special election . . . . 

This provision states that no application may be filed 

after a thirty day period before the date of the special election. 

This date, in the case which you mention, would be March 2, 1957. 

Our Interpretation of this statute Is substantiated by 

the case of Murchlson v. Darden, 171 S.W. 2d 220 (Tex.Civ.App. 

1943, error dism.). The statute in this case provided that an 

absentee ballot must be cast not 

to the date of such an election". 

"less than three (3) days, prior 

The court held that this provision meant that three (3) full days must Intervene between the 

end of the last day of the period for casting an absentee ballot 

and the beginning of the day on which the election was to be 

held. We think that in the 

that there must be thirty (30 P 

resent case this holding dictates 

whole day8 between the ending of 

the time for filing the application mentioned In Article 4.10 

and the beginning of the day set for the special election. 
Ron. Zollle Steakley, page.2 - UU-38 

Thus, all applications must be filed not later than mldnight March 2, 1957. Attorney General's Oplnions R-1164,0-4455, 

and O-2298, copies of vhlch are here enclosed, also support the 

above conclusion. 

SUMMARY 

Application for one's name to appear 

upon the official ballot at the Special 

Senatorial Election called for April 2, 

1957, must be filed not later than mldnight March 2, 1957. 

Yours very truly 

WILL WILSON 

By z?. /6! -u-G--d 

B. K. Timmlns, Timmlns. Jr. 

Assistant At&neytorney General ' 

JHM:zt 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

By H. Grady Chandler 

Chairman
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERTO ANTONIO MENDIOLA

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 304

- CR

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D01577 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until March 24 , 2017

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Daele e n R. Melendez , Court Reporter for the 168 th District

Court

, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before March 24 , 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23 rd day of February, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox

, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 
                  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
                  as Adopted Pursuant to 
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MMR Information Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Robert H. Lorsch, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Naj Allana, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|/s/ Robert H. Lorsch
|--------------------
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               
|                    
|/s/ Naj Allana      
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being "filed"
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to
the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
PEDR O C OR T EZ-AR

R EOLA, AKA Pe dro C orte z ,

Pe t i tione r,
v. M ERR IC K B
. GARLAND, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 20-72055 Age n c y No. A205-117-014
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 10, 2023 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : KLEINFELD, HUR W ITZ, a nd R . NELSON, C irc u it Judge s. Pe dro C orte z -Arre ola

pe titions for re vie wof the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a ls’ s de c ision a ffirm i ng the im m igration judge ’ s de nia l of his a pplic ation for withholding of rem o v a l. W e dism iss the pe tition. 

# F IL ED MAY15 2023 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).Unde r 8 U.S.C
. § 1252(d)(1), we m ay re v ie w a fina l orde r of re m ova l only if the p e titione r “ ha s e xha

uste d a ll a dm inistra

tive re m e d ie s a

va i la ble to [him

or he r]
a s of right.” This provision re quire s pe titione rs to pre se nt a rgum e nts the y

a dva nc e be fore this c ourt to theB oa rd first. Se e Vasque

z-Rodrigue

z v . Garland

, 7 F.4th 888, 894 (9th C ir. 2021) (“ [W ] e have he ld tha t the sta tute a lso re quire s issue
e xha ustion, or, in othe

r words, tha

t it pe rm its us to c onside r only those issue s tha

t the p e titione r prope rly ra ise d be fore the a g e nc y .” ) (c olle c ting c a se s). To e x ha ust
an a rgum e n t, a pe t itione r m

ust ide ntify

it to theB oa

rd in a m anne r pre c i se e nough to put it “ on notic e of what wa s be ing c ha lle nge d.” Barev . Barr , 975 F.3d 952, 960 (9th C i r. 2020). C orte z -Arre ola

argue s be fore us tha

t the a ge nc y

e rre d by (1) fa iling to
c onside r pa st pe rse c ution from his pe rspe c tive a s a

m inor a t the re l e va

nt tim e ; a nd (2) finding him

c a pa ble of re l oc a ting to other parts of M e x ic o. Ye t he ra ise d
ne ithe r of the se argum e nts to theB o ard. The B oa rd, a s a re sult, did not ha

ve an opportunity

to a d dre ss the m . B e c a use C o rte z -Arre ola fa ile d to c o m ply with § 1252(d)’ s e x ha

ustion
re quire m e nt, we dism iss the pe tition. The te m pora ry sta y of re m ova l re m a ins in pla c e until the

m andat e issue s. C orte z -Arre ola ’ s m otion for a sta y of re m ova l, Dkt. 30, is othe rwise de nie d.
2DISM I SSE D
.

3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas Manuel,Chief Executive Officer of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc.,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Aventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: November 9,  2010 |   | /s/ Thomas Manuel       |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Thomas Manuel           |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58734-58735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Notice of Adjustment of Statewide Per Capita Impact Indicator

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact 
indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on 
or after October 1, 2005 will be increased.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2005 and applies to major disasters declared 
on or after October 1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Walke, Recovery Division, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 44 CFR 206.48 provides that FEMA will adjust 
the statewide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance 
program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban 
Consumers published by the Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact indicator 
will be increased to $1.18 for all disasters declared on or after 
October 1, 2005.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 3.6 percent for the 12-month period 
ended in August 2005. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 15, 2005.


[[Page 58735]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants)
R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-20296 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Wendell DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 2001-CP-01511-COA.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

May 6, 2003.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 2003.

*153Wendell Duncan (Pro Se), attorney for appellant.

Office of the Attorney General by: Jean Smith Vaughan, attorney for appellee.

Before SOUTHWICK, P.J., BRIDGES and CHANDLER, JJ.

BRIDGES, J., for the court.

¶ 1. This is a collateral appeal under the Post-Conviction Relief Act from the Washington County Circuit Court where Wendell Duncan was indicted on two charges, shooting into an occupied dwelling (cause no. 18,245) and aggravated assault (cause no. 18,246). According to the partial transcript, at the plea hearing Duncan pled as a habitual offender under Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-83. The trial court held that the State did not satisfy the provisions of the habitual statute and thus Duncan was sentenced to a thirty year term on the conviction of armed robbery to run consecutively to a previously imposed sentence of twelve years on a burglary conviction.

¶ 2. Duncan’s first motion for post-conviction relief was earlier addressed and his second motion, termed a “Writ of Ha-beas Corpus”, seeking relief from his sentence was denied by the circuit court as a successive petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act. Duncan now appeals to this Court.

¶ 3. This motion is prohibited by Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-27(9) (Supp.2002) which provides, “the dismissal or denial of an application under this section is a final judgment and shall be a bar to a second or successive application under this chapter.” The record reflects that Duncan brought his initial motion for post-conviction relief about January 17, 1996, which was later denied by the circuit court. This constitutes his second motion which is procedurally barred under Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-27(9) (Supp 2002).

¶ 4. Duncan’s motion is also time barred as it does not fall within the allotted three year time limitation. Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) states in part: “a motion for relief under this chapter shall be made within three years after the time in which the prisoner’s direct appeal is ruled upon by the Supreme Court of Mississippi or ... in case of a guilty plea, within three (3)years after entry of the judgment of conviction.” Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) (Supp.2002). Thus, Duncan’s motion is time barred as well.

¶ 5. THE JUDGMENT OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF IS AFFIRMED. COSTS ARE ASSESSED TO WASHINGTON COUNTY.

McMILLIN, C.J. AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., THOMAS, LEE, MYERS, CHANDLER AND GRIFFIS, JJ., *154CONCUR. IRVING, J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY. KING, P.J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV Pharmaceutical,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.


/s/ Barbara Duncan
---------------------------
Barbara Duncan
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000673

18-APR-2019

07:48 AM
STATE v. Billy Ray ARTIS

316P98-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Billy Ray Artis, for Artis, Billy Ray.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of June 2018 by Defendant for Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Ervin, J. Recused
STATE v. Douglas Wayne STANALAND

333P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Douglas Wayne Stanaland, for Stanaland, Douglas Wayne.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of October 2018 by Defendant for Production of Evidence:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jesus
Oliveras, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Precious Metals, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1.          This
Quarterly Report on 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Date:
 February 17, 2009       | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Jesus
 Oliveras            | 
|                               | 
|Jesus
 Oliveras,               | 
|Chief
 Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal
 Financial Officer) | 



---
STATE of North Carolina v. James Opleton BRADLEY

No. 429P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Bradley, James Opleton.

Matt Sawchak, Solicitor General, Kenzie M. Rakes, Assistant Solicitor General, Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."