<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

              ----------------------------------------------------

                                   FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)

[X]     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
        ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

[ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
        EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______ TO ________

                          COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-32249

                     ENTECH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
               (Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)

            FLORIDA                                       98-0222013
(State or other jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)

8513 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA                  91730
 (Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (909) 912-0828

 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:    NONE

 Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
                    COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE
                                (Title of class)

                          CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC.,
           8260 RYAN ROAD, RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA V7A 2EC
                            (Previous Name, Address)

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding twelve months (or such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

         State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $ None.

         State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the
common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common
equity, as of March 29, 2004: $ 4,642,875

         Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock as of March 29, 2004: 12,285,000.

         Documents incorporated by reference:  None.





<PAGE>

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.    Business............................................................1
Item 2.    Description of Property............................................11
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings..................................................11
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................12
Item 5.    Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters...........12
Item 6.    Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation..........17
Item 7.    Financial Statements...............................................18
Item 8.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
           and Financial Disclosure...........................................18
Item 8A.   Controls and Procedures............................................18
Item 9.    Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
           Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act..................19
Item 10.   Executive Compensation.............................................23
Item 11.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
           and Related Stockholder Matters....................................24
Item 12.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.....................25
Item 13.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...................................27
Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services.............................28
Index to Financial Statements................................................F-2





<PAGE>

                                     PART I

ITEM 1.      BUSINESS.

         Statements in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report may be "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions or
any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or
conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and
projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by our
management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and probably will, differ materially
from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to
numerous factors, including those described above and those risks discussed from
time to time in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report, including the risks described
under "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and in other documents which we file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

         In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and
uncertainties related to our financial condition, factors that affect our
industry, market and customer acceptance, competition, government regulations
and requirements and pricing, as well as general industry and market conditions
and growth rates, and general economic conditions. Any forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not
undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

         We are a provider of construction, repair, and maintenance services for
fueling related businesses. Currently, the focus of our attention is in
California, Arizona, and Nevada. We offer complete planning and construction
services for gas stations, convenience stores, fast food restaurants, retail
shopping centers, and truck stops, as well as comprehensive remodeling and
re-imaging services and, regulatory compliance testing. In addition, we manage
and maintain attached underground storage tanks and related environmental
issues.

         We were initially incorporated in 1998 in Florida as Cyber Public
Relations, Inc. for the purpose of providing Internet electronic commerce
consulting services to small and medium size businesses. Cyber Public Relations
has never had any material operations or revenues. We changed our name to Entech
Environmental Technologies, Inc. on March 22, 2004 to more accurately reflect
our business operations.

         On January 21, 2004, pursuant to a Capital Stock Exchange Agreement
between the stockholders of Environmental Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, the Environmental Technologies stockholders transferred all of
their shares of the Environmental Technologies stock to Cyber Public Relations
in exchange for 9,550,000 shares of the common stock of Cyber Public Relations.

         As a result of the exchange, Environmental Technologies, Inc. became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Cyber Public Relations, and the Environmental
Technologies stockholders acquired 96.81 percent of the issued and outstanding
shares of the common stock of Cyber Public Relations. Immediately following the
exchange, Barron Partners LP acquired 2,000,000 shares of our common stock and
warrants for the purchase of 7,150,000 shares of our common stock.

         Our wholly-owned subsidiary Environmental Technologies, Inc. is a
Nevada corporation located in Rancho Cucamonga, California, formerly known as
Parr Development, Inc., which was incorporated in 2001. Before the mergers of
its subsidiaries described in this Item 1, Parr Development had not engaged in
any operations. Parr Development changed its name to Environmental Technologies
in 2003. We are the result of the recent combination of several companies:

o        Christie-Peterson Development, a California corporation incorporated in
         1995, a provider of construction, repair, and maintenance services for
         petroleum service stations in California, Nevada, and Arizona;

                                       1





<PAGE>

o        H.B. Covey, Inc., a California corporation incorporated in 1971 but
         which has been in business since 1948, a fueling station diagnostic and
         maintenance company with petroleum construction experience in building
         and maintaining service stations; and

o        Advanced Fuel Filtration Services, Inc., a California corporation
         incorporated in 1995 (herein sometimes referred to as "AFFS"), a
         provider of comprehensive environmental management solutions for the
         petroleum industry, with operations including fuel and chemical
         transportation, hazardous and non-hazardous waste disposal, emergency
         HAZMAT response, and underground storage tank cleaning and filtration
         services.

         We also acquired from the stockholders of AFFS all of the issued and
outstanding shares of Advanced Petroleum Transport, Inc., a California
corporation, with no business activities.

         The mechanics of the combination of the component companies of Entech
initially occurred with the reverse triangular mergers between each of
Christie-Peterson, H.B. Covey and AFFS with three subsidiaries of Environmental
Technologies. In each case, the stockholders of Christie-Peterson, H.B. Covey
and AFFS existing before the mergers received shares of the common stock of
Environmental Technologies in exchange for all of their shares in the merged
companies. Following the reverse triangular mergers, Environmental Technologies
had four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Christie-Peterson, H.B. Covey, AFFS, and
Advanced Petroleum Transport, Inc.

GENERAL

         CHRISTIE-PETERSON DEVELOPMENT. Through our Christie-Peterson
subsidiary, we are a provider of construction, repair, and maintenance services
for petroleum service stations in California, Nevada, and Arizona. As such, we
offer complete planning and construction services for fueling stations including
gas stations, convenience stores, fast food restaurants, retail shopping
centers, and truck stops, as well as comprehensive remodeling and re-imaging
services. Since 1995, we have built over 100 major commercial construction
projects totaling over $150 million for major class "A" downstream clients
including ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, Shell Oil, Ultramar, British
Petroleum/Arco, Safeway, Kroger, Wal-Mart, Jack-in-the-Box, and Taco Bell.

         In addition to our core business in construction and planning of
service stations, we also install and maintain attached underground storage
tanks ("USTs") for service stations, and perform gasoline and petroleum tank
removal, precision tank and line testing, and necessary ongoing maintenance on
tanks, lines, and pumps at fueling stations.

STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS AND EXPANSION

         In order to expand our general service station construction and
maintenance business and further build our revenues, we have undertaken an
aggressive expansion and acquisition program to capitalize upon our experience,
strategic relationships, favorable market space, and operational advantages. We
intend to broaden our operations through acquisitions of synergistic fit
candidates and become a full service environmental management company, offering
complete end-to-end construction, maintenance, and repair of service stations,
and begin to offer services oriented towards the future of the energy industry
with alternative fueling technology construction. We expect that our recent
acquisitions of H.B. Covey, Inc. and Advanced Fuel Filtration Services, Inc.
will enable us to perform additional construction and repair contracts,
strengthen customer relationships, and increase operating efficiencies, market
penetration and/or product superiority in order to build competitive advantage
and increase stockholder value.

         H.B. COVEY, INC. Our H.B. Covey subsidiary is a fueling station
diagnostic and maintenance company with over 55 years of petroleum construction
experience in building and maintaining service stations. Our maintenance
services include on-going, routine maintenance, in addition to providing quick
response to emergency situations. Through H.B. Covey, we are able to conduct
comprehensive service station diagnostic and maintenance services, including
diagnosis of integrity and corrosion of USTs, pipes, and pumps, installation and
removal of petroleum and chemical tanks, remediation systems installation,
excavation, containment systems, and installation of on-site screening
equipment.

                                       2





<PAGE>

         ADVANCED FUEL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC. Advanced Fuel Filtration
Services is a provider of comprehensive environmental management solutions for
the petroleum industry, with operations, including fuel and chemical
transportation, hazardous and non-hazardous waste disposal, emergency HAZMAT
response, and underground storage tank cleaning and filtration services. AFFS
specializes in above ground and underground fuel tank cleaning and rinsing
necessary to prevent corrosion and degradation of stored fuel and chemicals. In
addition to cleaning and filtering tanks to remove contaminants, AFFS also
offers recycling of oil contaminated by water, sediment, or other agents.

         AFFS has developed a first of its kind patent-pending UST leak
detection system capable of automatically monitoring the interstitial pressure
of storage tanks and instantly turning power off upon leak detection. This
system known as a Constant Vacuum Monitoring System ("CVMS") is expected to
provide a significant source of new revenues, with assumed weighted average
equipment and installation cost of $15,600. With incorporation of this device
into our service suite, we believe that we will have "first to market" advantage
in the newest round of California legislative regulations requiring detection of
leaks before the substance is released into the environment. California Assembly
Bill, AB-2481, requires all California UST owners to install vapor monitoring
systems beginning July 1, 2004. Our CVMS is the first monitoring device that has
received third party approval and to be recognized by the State of California as
compliant and ready for installation.

         Current California law requires that all USTs and product lines be
double walled to protect the environment from fuel being leaked into the soil.
The new California law requires that all owners of USTs continuously monitor the
space between the two walls throughout their complete underground system for
leakage. To do so, the space must be air tight and placed under a vacuum. If the
vacuum breaks, it signifies a product leak and prohibits the use of the tank
until the leak has been repaired. While the law is targeting new construction
first, we believe that California will ultimately require the monitoring of all
USTs.

         As of the date of this Annual Report we have received purchase orders
for 50 of our CVMS from a national supplier of parts and equipment to some of
the major oil companies (Shell, BP/Arco, ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco).

         In our opinion, the potential market size for the UST leak detection
system is approximately $700 million in California, based on approximately
45,000 USTs currently in service in California times an assumed weighted average
equipment and installation cost of $15,600, and approximately $20 billion nation
wide, inclusive of California, based on approximately 1.3 million USTs currently
in service times an assumed weighted average equipment and installation cost of
$15,600.

FUTURE FUELS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

         In order to capitalize on the expected nationwide shift towards cleaner
and more renewable sources of energy, we plan to develop a subsidiary, Future
Fuels Technology, Inc., which will develop and construct fueling stations using
LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), and hydrogen fuel. We
have identified the planned Interstate Clean Transportation Corridor as our
initial target market. Federal and state regulations mandate reduced diesel
emissions by 90 percent beginning in 2008. Early estimates anticipate 250
alternative fueling sites are needed to meet forecasted demand, which equate to
a $500 million total market size, using our projected cost of $2 million per
site. As a fueling station contractor, we believe that we are well positioned to
fulfill this market need.

KEY PERSONNEL

         Our future financial success depends to a large degree upon the
personal efforts of our key personnel. In our formative period as a newly
amalgamated enterprise, our current officers and directors have played the major
roles in developing our business strategy and technology. The loss of the
services of any of these persons could have an adverse effect on our business
and our chances for profitable operations.

                                       3





<PAGE>

         While we intend to employ additional management and marketing personnel
in order to minimize the critical dependency upon any one person, there can be
no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining the persons
needed. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our current employees
and attracting new high quality employees, our business could be adversely
affected.

OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY FACTORS OUTSIDE OF OUR CONTROL

         Our future operating results may vary significantly from quarter to
quarter due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. Our
anticipated expense levels are based, in part, on our estimates of future
revenues and may vary from our projections. We may be unable to adjust spending
rapidly enough to compensate for any unexpected revenues shortfall. Accordingly,
any significant shortfall in revenues in relation to our planned expenditures
would materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial
condition.

         We cannot predict with certainty our revenues and operating results.
Further, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results
are not necessarily a meaningful indication of future performance.

PATENTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

         PATENTS. On May 19, 2003, we filed a provisional patent application
entitled "Secondary Containment Monitoring System" bearing Docket No. PP0388-2
with the United States Patent and Trademark Office under application Serial No.
60/471,828. Generally, the invention relates to providing a system for improved
apparatus and methods for detecting and preventing leakage of materials from
USTs. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have yet to receive an initial
office action in this case. We are currently working on an additional embodiment
for this invention. It appears that these additions may require the filing of a
continuation-in-part application.

         BACKGROUND OF THE PERCEIVED NEED. Typically, the release of hazardous
materials from USTs, and their connected piping, has resulted in tremendous
safety hazards, health problems, economic loss, and damage to the environment.
For example, in December 1984, a Union Carbide UST in Bhopal, India suffered a
small leak. The escaped methyl isocyanate killed 4,000 people in a matter of
hours. Over the years, the death toll has risen to 14,410 as those sickened by
the gas later died. Furthermore, Union Carbide was required to pay $470 million,
to the Indian government, as an out of court settlement. As a result, efforts
have been made worldwide to detect and prevent leakage from USTs.

         Leak detection technology faces further design restrictions due to
regulations promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency,
the European Committee for Standardization (CEM), as well as other various state
laws. For example, the EPA requires that all hazardous substance USTs have
secondary containment configurations. A single walled tank is the first or
primary containment. Using only primary containment, a leak can escape directly
into the environment. However, by enclosing the UST within a second barrier,
leaks can be contained and detected quickly before harming the environment.

         There are several examples of ways to construct secondary containment.
One way involves placing one tank inside of another tank or one pipe inside of
another pipe. Another way involves placing the UST system inside a concrete
vault. Finally, another method of secondary containment involves placing a
lining around the excavation zone of a UST, whereby the liner is a material that
cannot be penetrated by the hazardous substance. In addition to the EPA's
secondary containment requirements, hazardous substance USTs must have a leak
detection system that can indicate the presence of a leak in the confined space
between the first and the second wall.

         Furthermore, the current trend in regulations is towards inspecting
more frequently for leaks. Current EPA regulations require that UST TARP's or
trained alarm response person (TARP) determine, at least every 30 days, whether
or not the UST, and its piping, are leaking. The UST leak detection system must
be able to detect a release from any portion of the tank and connected
underground piping that routinely contains the hazardous material. As such,
development of a leak detection and prevention system capable of continuously
monitoring the integrity of an installed and operational UST, and its
underground piping, and capable of automatically turning off power, in our
opinion is desirable. In addition, the EPA requires that UST TARP's, upon
detection of a leak, take immediate action to prevent further release of
hazardous materials. A TARP must turn off system power and "bag" the nozzle.

                                       4





<PAGE>

         A patent application does not in and of itself grant exclusive rights.
A patent application must be reviewed by the patent office of each relevant
country prior to issuing as a patent and granting exclusive rights.

         TRADEMARKS. We do not have any trademarks.

RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE COULD RENDER OUR PRODUCTS OBSOLETE

         Our markets are characterized by rapid technological changes, frequent
new product introductions and enhancements, uncertain product life cycles,
changes in customer requirements, and evolving industry standards. The
introduction of new products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new
industry standards could render our existing products obsolete. Our future
success will depend upon our ability to continue to develop and introduce a
variety of new products and product enhancements to address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of our customers. We may experience delays in releasing new
products and product enhancements in the future. Material delays in introducing
new products or product enhancements may cause customers to forego purchases of
our products and purchase those of our competitors.

EMPLOYEES

         Currently, we have approximately 200 employees. As we grow, we will
need to attract an unknown number of additional qualified employees. Although we
have experienced no work stoppages and believe our relationships with our
employees are good, we could be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the
persons needed. None of our employees are currently represented by a labor
union. Considered one of the fastest growing areas in the United States, the
Inland Empire area of southern California, where we are located, is expected to
provide a ready source of available labor to support our growth.

PREVIOUS ACTIVITIES

         Before the exchange with Entech, as Cyber Public Relations, we were a
development stage company formed for the purpose of providing internet
electronic commerce ("e-commerce") consulting services to small and medium size
businesses. We planned to do business on the Internet under the name Galaxyblue
Jewelry (www.galaxyblue.com). Previously, our principal executive offices were
located at 8260 Ryan Road, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 2E5. We have ceased
all of the business activities formerly undertaken by Cyber Public Relations.

RISK FACTORS

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

IN OUR COMBINED FORM WE ARE A NEW BUSINESS WITH A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND
ARE NOT LIKELY TO SUCCEED UNLESS WE CAN OVERCOME THE MANY OBSTACLES WE FACE.

         In our combined form, we have a limited operating history. We are a
recent amalgamation of six separate companies, including Cyber Public Relations,
Inc., a Florida corporation incorporated in 1998 with no material business
operations, Environmental Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation incorporated
in 2001 with no material business operations, Christie-Peterson Development, a
California corporation incorporated in 1995, H.B. Covey, Inc., a California
corporation incorporated in 1971, but which has been in business since 1948,
Advanced Fuel Filtrations Services, Inc., a California corporation incorporated
in 1995, and Advanced Petroleum Transport, Inc., a California corporation with
no business activities. In its combined form, Entech has only recently engaged
in active business operations.

         However, Christie-Peterson, H.B. Covey, and Advanced Fuel Filtration
Services have all conducted operations since their founding, with
Christie-Peterson and H.B. Covey showing a profit during the fiscal year ended
on September 30, 2003. Advanced Fuel Filtration Services would have shown a
profit during the fiscal year ended on September 30, 2003, but for the fact that
it spent considerable resources on research and development.

                                       5





<PAGE>

         To date, our efforts have been devoted primarily to the following:

o        Organizational activities;

o        Developing a business plan for our combined businesses;

o        Obtaining funding;

o        Conducting research and working toward the ultimate successful
         development of our products and services;

o        Marketing to major petroleum retailers; and

o        Aggressively patenting our intellectual property.

         We are still in our formative stage as a newly combined company. You
should be aware of the difficulties, delays and expenses normally encountered by
an enterprise which is an amalgamation of several entities, many of which are
beyond our control, including unanticipated research and developmental expenses,
employment costs, and administrative expenses. We cannot assure our stockholders
that our proposed business plans as described in this Annual Report will
materialize or prove successful, or that we will ever be able to finalize
development of our products or services or operate profitably. If we cannot
operate profitably, you could lose your entire investment. As a result of the
nature of our business, initially we expect to sustain substantial operating
expenses without generating significant revenues.

OUR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS MAY NOT RESULT IN COMMERCIALLY VIABLE
PRODUCTS WHICH COULD RESULT IN A DECLINE OF OUR STOCK PRICE AND A LOSS OF YOUR
INVESTMENT.

         Some of our technologies are in the development stage. Further research
and development efforts will be required to develop these technologies to the
point where they can be incorporated into commercially viable or salable
products. We have set forth in this Annual Report our proposed research and
development program as it is currently conceived. We cannot assure you, however,
that this program will be accomplished in the order or in the time frame set
forth. We reserve the right to modify the research and development program. We
may not succeed in developing commercially viable products from our
technologies. If we are not successful in developing commercially viable
products or if such products become obsolete, our ability to generate revenues
from our technologies will be severely limited. This could result in the loss of
all or part of your investment.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DEVELOP A MARKET FOR OUR TECHNOLOGY WHICH WILL MOST LIKELY
CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.

         The demand and price for our technology and related products will be
based upon the existence of markets for the technology and products and the
markets for products of others, especially relating to vapor detection devices
which may utilize our technology. The extent to which we may gain a share of our
intended markets will depend, in part, upon the cost effectiveness and
performance of our technology and products when compared to alternative
technologies, which may be conventional or heretofore unknown. If the technology
or products of other companies provide more cost-effective alternatives or
otherwise outperform our technology or products, the demand for our technology
or products maybe adversely affected. Our success will be dependent upon market
acceptance of our technology and related products. Failure of our technology to
achieve and maintain meaningful levels of market acceptance would materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
market penetration. This would likely cause our stock price to decline.

                                       6





<PAGE>

IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY IN OUR INDUSTRY, OUR FUTURE GROWTH AND
OPERATING RESULTS WILL SUFFER.

         Our future success depends on our ability to compete effectively with
other providers of construction, repair, and maintenance services for petroleum
service stations, including major corporations. In our combined form, we are an
early-stage research and development and construction company. As a result, we
may have difficulty competing with larger, established providers of
construction, repair, and maintenance services for petroleum service stations.
Most of our potential competitors will be established, well-known companies that
have:

o        Substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources;

o        Larger customer bases;

o        Better name recognition;

o        Related product offerings; and

o        Larger marketing areas.

         While no one competitor directly matches our array of services,
companies that compete in one or more aspects of our business include Veeder
Root, SJ Weaver and CE Thomas, to name a few. We believe that, because of our
technology, the majority of products currently available in the marketplace do
not favorably compare with ours. Since these companies may possibly develop leak
detection solutions for their own product lines, they may ultimately be in
competition with us. If we do not compete effectively with current and future
competitors, our future growth and operating results will be adversely affected.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND WE MAY INFRINGE THE
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF OTHERS. OUR INABILITY TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS COULD IMPAIR
OUR BUSINESS AND CAUSE US TO INCUR SUBSTANTIAL EXPENSE TO ENFORCE OUR RIGHTS.

         Proprietary rights are critically important to us. Although we intend
to aggressively pursue additional patent protection for our technologies as we
continue to develop them, we cannot assure you that any additional patents will
be issued. Even though we will seek to defend our patents and to protect our
other proprietary rights, our actions may be inadequate to protect our patents
and other proprietary rights from infringement by others, or to prevent others
from claiming infringement of their patents and other proprietary rights.

         Policing unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and some
foreign laws do not provide the same level of protection as U.S. laws.
Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect the trade secrets or patents that we may obtain, or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such
litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and have
a material adverse effect on our future operating results.

INTENSE COMPETITION IN THE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COULD REDUCE
OUR MARKET SHARE AND PROFITS.

         We serve markets that are highly competitive and in which a large
number of local and regional companies compete. In particular, the engineering
and construction markets are highly competitive and require substantial
resources and capital investment in equipment, technology, and skilled
personnel. Competition also places downward pressure on our contract prices and
profit margins. Intense competition is expected to continue in these markets,
presenting us with significant challenges to our ability to achieve strong
growth rates and acceptable profit margins. If we are unable to meet these
competitive challenges, we could lose market share to our competitors and
experience an overall reduction in our profits.

                                       7





<PAGE>

OUR ACQUISITION STRATEGY INVOLVES A NUMBER OF RISKS.

         We intend to pursue growth through the opportunistic acquisition of
companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product lines to provide
more cost-effective customer solutions. We routinely review potential
acquisitions. This strategy involves certain risks, including difficulties in
the integration of operations and systems, the diversion of our management's
attention from other business concerns, and the potential loss of key employees
of acquired companies. We may not be able to successfully acquire, and/or
integrate acquired businesses into our operations.

OUR PROJECTS EXPOSE US TO POTENTIAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, PRODUCT LIABILITY,
OR WARRANTY OR OTHER CLAIMS.

         We engineer and construct large fueling station and storage facilities
in which system failure could be disastrous. Notwithstanding the fact that we
generally will not accept liability for consequential damages in our contracts,
any catastrophic occurrence in excess of insurance limits at projects where our
products are installed or services are performed could result in significant
professional liability, product liability or warranty or other claims against
us. Such liabilities could potentially exceed our current insurance coverage and
the fees we derive from those products and services. A partially or completely
uninsured claim, if successful and of a significant magnitude, could potentially
result in substantial losses.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES.

         We are subject to environmental laws and regulations, including those
concerning:

o        Emissions into the atmosphere;

o        Discharge into waterways;

o        Generation, storage, handling, treatment and disposal of waste
         materials; and

o        Health and safety.

         Our businesses often involve working around and with volatile, toxic
and hazardous substances and other highly regulated materials, the improper
characterization, handling or disposal of which could constitute violations of
foreign, federal, state or local statutes and laws, and result in criminal and
civil liabilities. Environmental laws and regulations generally impose
limitations and standards for certain pollutants or waste materials and require
us to obtain a permit and comply with various other requirements. Governmental
authorities may seek to impose fines and penalties on us, or revoke or deny
issuance or renewal of operating permits, for failure to comply with applicable
laws and regulations.

         The environmental health and safety laws and regulations to which we
are subject are constantly changing, and it is impossible to predict the effect
of such laws and regulations on us in the future. We cannot ensure that our
operations will continue to comply with future laws and regulations or that
these laws and regulations will not significantly adversely affect us.

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES UNDER DEVELOPMENT; NEED FOR MARKET ACCEPTANCE.

         Several of our proposed products and service offerings are still under
development, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to complete
development and successfully commercialize these products and processes. There
may be unanticipated technological, regulatory and marketing problems that may
make our products or services unfeasible to produce market or commercialize.
There can be no assurance that our efforts or the efforts of others will be
successful in fostering acceptance of our technology among the targeted markets.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR STOCK

WE MAY NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE NECESSARY
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL, OUR BUSINESS MAY FAIL OR OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND OUR STOCK
PRICE MAY BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

         Because we are a newly combined company, we need to secure adequate
funding. If we are unable to obtain adequate funding, we may not be able to
successfully develop and market our products and services and our business will
most likely fail. We do not have commitments for additional financing. To secure

                                       8





<PAGE>

additional financing, we may need to borrow money or sell more securities, which
may reduce the value of our outstanding securities. We may be unable to secure
additional financing on favorable terms or at all.

         Selling additional stock, either privately or publicly, would dilute
the equity interests of our stockholders. If we borrow more money, we will have
to pay interest and may also have to agree to restrictions that limit our
operating flexibility. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing, we may
have to curtail business operations which would have a material negative effect
on operating results and most likely result in a lower stock price.

OUR COMMON STOCK HAS EXPERIENCED IN THE PAST, AND IS EXPECTED TO EXPERIENCE IN
THE FUTURE, SIGNIFICANT PRICE AND VOLUME VOLATILITY, WHICH SUBSTANTIALLY
INCREASES THE RISK THAT YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR SHARES AT OR ABOVE THE
PRICE THAT YOU PAY FOR THE SHARES.

         Because of the limited trading market for our common stock, and because
of the possible price volatility, you may not be able to sell your shares of
common stock when you desire to do so. During 2002 and 2003, and through the
date of this Annual Report, our common stock was sold and purchased at prices
that ranged from a high of $3.00 to a low of $0.01 per share. The inability to
sell your shares in a rapidly declining market may substantially increase your
risk of loss because of such illiquidity because the price for our common stock
may suffer greater declines due to its price volatility.

         The price of our common stock that will prevail in the market may be
higher or lower than the price you pay. Certain factors, some of which are
beyond our control, that may cause our share price to fluctuate significantly
include, but are not limited to, the following:

o        Variations in our quarterly operating results;

o        Our ability to complete the research and development of our
         technologies;

o        The development of a market in general for our products and services;

o        Changes in market valuations of similar companies;

o        Announcement by us or our competitors of significant contracts,
         acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
         commitments;

o        Loss of a major customer or failure to complete significant
         transactions;

o        Additions or departures of key personnel; and

o        Fluctuations in stock market price and volume.

         Additionally, in recent years the stock market in general, and the OTC
Bulletin Board and technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations. In some cases, these fluctuations are unrelated
or disproportionate to the operating performance of the underlying company.
These market and industry factors may materially and adversely affect our stock
price, regardless of our operating performance.

         Over the past few months, there have been periods of significant
increases in trading volume of our common stock during which the price of our
stock has both increased and decreased. The historical trading of our common
stock is not necessarily an indicator of how it will trade in the future and our
trading price as of the date of this Annual Report does not necessarily portend
what the trading price of our common stock might be in the future.

         In the past, class action litigation has often been brought against
companies following periods of volatility in the market price of the common
stock of those companies. If we become involved in this type of litigation in
the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of management
attention and resources, which could have a further negative effect on your
investment in our stock.

                                       9





<PAGE>

OUR DIRECTORS HAVE THE RIGHT TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK AND
ADDITIONAL SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

         Our directors, within the limitations and restrictions contained in our
articles of incorporation and without further action by our stockholders, have
the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or
more series and to fix the number of shares and the relative rights, conversion
rights, voting rights, and terms of redemption, liquidation preferences and any
other preferences, special rights and qualifications of any such series. We have
no intention of issuing preferred stock at the present time. Any issuance of
preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common
stock.

         Should we issue additional shares of our common stock at a later time,
each investor's ownership interest in Entech would be proportionally reduced. No
investor will have any preemptive right to acquire additional shares of our
common stock, or any of our other securities.

THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES UPON THE EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING WARRANTS MAY CAUSE
IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION TO OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS.

         The issuance of shares upon the exercise of warrants may result in
substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since the selling
stockholders may ultimately convert and sell the full amount issuable on
conversion. There is no upper limit on the number of shares that may be issued
which will have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest
and voting power of holders of our common stock.

IF WE FAIL TO REMAIN CURRENT ON OUR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, WE COULD BE REMOVED
FROM THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF BROKER-DEALERS TO
SELL OUR SECURITIES AND THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR SECURITIES IN
THE SECONDARY MARKET.

         Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as Entech, must be
reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to
maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we fail to
remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC
Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be
severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell
our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the
secondary market.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS SUBJECT TO THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES OF THE SEC AND THE
TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN OUR
STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.

         The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which
establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us,
as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or
with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Inasmuch as that the current bid and ask price of common stock is
less than $5.00 per share, our shares are classified as "penny stock" under the
rules of the SEC. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt,
the rules require:

o        That a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in
         penny stocks; and

o        The broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to
         the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny
         stock to be purchased.

         In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny
         stocks, the broker or dealer must:

o        Obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of
         the person; and

o        Make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks
         are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge
         and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the
         risks of transactions in penny stocks.

                                       10





<PAGE>

         The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the
penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

o        Sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
         determination; and

o        That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the
         investor prior to the transaction.

         Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in
securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult
for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market
value of our stock.

         Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny
stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative,
current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to
an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny
stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

ITEM 2.      DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

         We lease various facilities as follows:

o        From Robert K. Christie, our chief operating officer, director and a
         controlling stockholder, approximately 23,000 square feet of
         warehouse/office space in Rancho Cucamonga, California for an annual
         rental of $168,000. The lease expires in December 2013.

o        Approximately 5,000 square feet and three acres of fence yard in
         Corona, California for an annual rental of $84,000. The lease expires
         in June 2004.

o        Approximately 7,000 square feet in Corona, California for an annual
         rental of $57,600. The lease expires in September 2004.

o        From Burr Northrop, one of our officers and a controlling stockholder,
         approximately 8,000 square feet of warehouse space in Chino, California
         for an annual rental of $54,000. The lease expires in October 2006.

o        Approximately 4,000 square feet in Pomona, California for an annual
         rental of $14,400. The lease is a month to month lease.

o        Approximately 3,000 square feet of commercial office space in Phoenix,
         Arizona for an annual rental of $19,200. The lease is a year to year
         lease and expires in August 2004.

         We believe that all of our facilities are adequate for our current
operations. However, we expect that we could locate other suitable facilities at
comparable rates, should we need more space.

         Before the exchange with Entech, Cyber Public Relations operated out of
premises owned by our former president's father at 8260 Ryan Road, Richmond,
British Columbia V7A 2E5. The space was used by us free of charge.

ITEM 3.      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

         Before the exchange between Cyber Public Relations and Entech, we were
not engaged in any litigation, and we are unaware of any claims or complaints
that could result in future litigation. However, since the exchange with Entech
we are subject to several claims, none of which are material. Some of the claims
against us are covered by insurance.

                                       11





<PAGE>

         We will seek to minimize disputes with our customers but recognize the
inevitability of legal action in today's business environment as an unfortunate
price of conducting business.

         In the ordinary course of business the Company has become subject to
additional litigation and claims on various matters. These exists the
possibility that the Company will not prevail in all cases. However, barring
unanticipated adverse final determination in these litigation and claims, the
Company does not believe that such litigation and claims would have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition.

ITEM 4.      SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

         None.

                                     PART II

ITEM 5.      MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

         Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
"EEVT." However, prior to March 23, 2004, our symbol was "CBRP." Our stock was
not actively traded until July, 2002, and the following table sets forth, for
the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low bid prices. These quotations
reflect inter-dealer prices, without mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may
not represent actual transactions.

            CALENDAR YEAR 2002       HIGH BID      LOW BID
         First Quarter                 N/A           N/A
         Second Quarter                N/A           N/A
         Third Quarter                 $0.02        $0.01
         Fourth Quarter                $0.02        $0.01

            CALENDAR YEAR 2003       HIGH BID      LOW BID
         First Quarter                 $0.25        $0.01
         Second Quarter                $0.02        $0.02
         Third Quarter                 $0.01        $0.01
         Fourth Quarter                $0.25        $0.01

            CALENDAR YEAR 2004       HIGH BID      LOW BID
         First Quarter                 $3.00        $1.60

         We currently have 12,285,000 shares of our common stock outstanding.
Our shares of common stock are held by approximately 52 stockholders of record.
The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer
agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are
held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing
agencies.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

         None.

WARRANTS

         $2.50 WARRANTS AND $3.00 WARRANTS. As of the date of this Annual
Report, we have authorized the issuance of 260,000 three-year detachable
warrants for common stock exercisable at $2.50 per share and 260,000 three-year
detachable warrants for common stock exercisable at $3.00 per share. All of the
warrants contain the same terms. Each of the warrants:

o        Expires on the third anniversary date of its issuance;

o        Contains typical anti-dilution provisions providing for appropriate
         adjustment of the number of exercisable shares and the exercise price
         based on any subdivisions or consolidations of our shares; and

o        Contains typical provisions protecting the holders' exercise rights in
         the event of any consolidation or merger of Entech into another entity.

                                       12





<PAGE>

o        Contains registration rights.

         WARRANTS FOR BARRON PARTNERS LP. We have issued our A Warrant, B
Warrant, C Warrant, D Warrant, and E Warrant to Barron Partners LP to purchase
7,150,000 shares of our common stock as described below, at any time prior to
5:00 p.m., Rancho Cucamonga, California time on January 23, 2009, or 18 months
after the effectiveness of a registration statement for the shares covered by
the warrants, whichever is longer. With respect to the cashless nature of all of
the warrants, the holder may not affect a cashless exercise of a warrant until
after July 23, 2004, and thereafter so long as there is an effective
registration statement with respect to the shares of our common stock covered by
the warrant.

         A WARRANT. The A Warrant is for 1,500,000 shares of our common stock.
It is cashless and non-callable. The exercise price is $1.00 per share. The
exercise price will be adjusted on a sliding scale if our earnings before
interest and taxes ("EBIT"), not including any non recurring gains or losses, is
less than $3,000,000 for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2004 (the
"Adjustment Date") as hereinafter described. If EBIT is $2,000,000 or less as of
the Adjustment Date, then the exercise price will be $0.25 per share of our
common stock. If EBIT is less than $3,000,000 but more than $2,000,000 as of the
Adjustment Date, then the exercise price will equal $1.00 - [$.75 x
($3,000,000-E)/$1,000,000], where E is the actual EBIT as of Adjustment Date. In
no event will the exercise price be less than $0.25 per share of our common
stock.

         B WARRANT. The B Warrant is for 1,650,000 shares of our common stock.
It is cashless and callable. The exercise price is $1.00 per share. The exercise
price will be adjusted on a sliding scale if EBIT, not including any non
recurring gains or losses, is less than $3,000,000 for our fiscal year ending as
of the Adjustment Date. If EBIT is $2,000,000 or less as of the Adjustment Date,
then the exercise price will be $0.25 per share of our common stock. If EBIT is
less than $3,000,000 but more than $2,000,000 as of the Adjustment Date, then
the exercise price will equal $1.00 - [$.75 x ($3,000,000-E)/$1,000,000], where
E is the actual EBIT as of Adjustment Date. In no event will the exercise price
be less than $0.25 per share of our common stock.

         In the event that the closing price of our common stock as listed on a
nationally public securities market is $1.75 or more for a period of 20
consecutive trading days and there is a registration statement for our common
stock effective for such 20 consecutive trading days, we may call the B Warrant
upon 30 days notice and pay to the holder the sum of $0.001 per share of our
common stock covered by the B Warrant, for all such shares not purchased under
the exercise provisions at the expiration of the 30 days notice period.

         C WARRANT. The C Warrant is for 2,000,000 shares of our common stock.
It is cashless and callable. The exercise price is $2.50 per share. In the event
that the closing price of our common stock as listed on a national public
securities market is $2.75 or more for a period of 20 consecutive trading days
and there is a registration statement for our common stock effective for such 20
consecutive trading days, we may call the C Warrant upon 30 days notice and pay
to the holder the sum of $0.001 per share of our common stock covered by the C
Warrant, for all such shares not purchased under the exercise provisions at the
expiration of the 30 days notice period.

         D WARRANT. The D Warrant is for 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.
It is cashless and callable. The exercise price is $4.00 per share. In the event
that the closing price of our common stock as listed on a national public
securities market is $5.50 or more for a period of 20 consecutive trading days
and there is a registration statement for our common stock effective for such 20
consecutive trading days, we may call the D Warrant upon 30 days notice and pay
to the holder the sum of $0.001 per share of our common stock covered by the D
Warrant, for all such shares not purchased under the exercise provisions at the
expiration of the 30 days notice period.

         E WARRANT. The E Warrant is for 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.
It is cashless and callable. The exercise price is $6.00 per share. In the event
that the closing price of our common stock as listed on a national public
securities market is $8.00 or more for a period of 20 consecutive trading days
and there is a registration statement for our common stock effective for such 20
consecutive trading days, we may call the E Warrant upon 30 days notice and pay
to the holder the sum of $0.001 per share of our common stock covered by the E
Warrant, for all such shares not purchased under the exercise provisions at the
expiration of the 30 days notice period.

                                       13





<PAGE>

         REGISTRATION RIGHTS FOR THE BARRON PARTNERS WARRANTS. All of the
warrants issued to Barron Partners LP contain registration rights, including
demand registration rights. We will prepare and file within 60 days following
January 23, 2004 a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of
our common stock issuable under the Barron Partners warrants as well as the
2,000,000 shares of our common stock purchased by Barron Partners. "Registration
statement" means a registration statement filed by Entech on Form S-1, SB-2, or
S-3, or some other similar form pursuant to the Securities Act to register the
resale of our shares. We are obligated to use our best efforts to cause the
registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC on the earlier of:

o        July 23, 2004;

o        Ten days following the receipt of a "No Review" or similar letter from
         the SEC; or

o        The first day following the day the SEC determines the registration
         statement eligible to be declared effective.

         DEMAND REGISTRATION RIGHTS. At any time, Barron Partners may request
the registration, once and only once, under the Securities Act of all or part of
the registrable shares then outstanding. We are required to use our best efforts
to file such registration statement as promptly as practicable after the date
any such request is received by us and to cause such registration statement to
be declared effective. If more than 80 percent of the shares held by Barron
Partners as of January 23, 2004 have been registered or sold, this provision
shall expire.

         We have agreed that the registration statement shall include a plan of
distribution section reasonably acceptable to Barron Partners.

         If, after July 23, 2004 we have not registered the registrable
securities, we shall, for each such day, pay Barron Partners, as liquidated
damages and not as a penalty, an amount equal to 24 percent of $2,000,000 per
annum; and for any such day, such payment shall be made no later than the first
business day of the calendar month next succeeding the month in which such day
occurs.

         Our obligation terminates when Barron Partners no longer holds more
than 20 percent of its registrable securities.

         RIGHT TO INCLUDE ("PIGGY-BACK") REGISTRABLE SECURITIES. Barron Partners
has "piggy-back" registration rights similar to investors in our private
placements.

         WARRANTS FOR FOX & COMPANY, INC. We have also issued 475,375 warrants
to purchase shares of our common stock to Fox & Company, Inc., the broker who
arranged the investment by Barron Partners LP. All of the warrants described in
this paragraph are similar to the A Warrant issued to Barron Partners LP, except
that the exercise price is $1.10 and there is no adjustment to the exercise
price as called for in the A Warrant for Barron Partners. All warrants have
"piggy-back" registration rights the same as afforded to the investors under the
private placements.

         WARRANTS FOR VERTICAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. We have also issued
warrants to purchase 220,000 shares of our common stock to Vertical Capital
Partners, Inc., the broker who arranged the investment by the Accredited
Investor on March 25, 2004. All of the warrants described in this paragraph are
similar to the A Warrant issued to Barron Partners LP, except that the exercise
price is $1.65 and there is no adjustment to the exercise price as called for in
the A Warrant for Barron Partners. All warrants have "piggy-back" registration
rights the same as afforded to the investors under the private placements.

INVESTOR REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENTS

         "PIGGY-BACK" REGISTRATION RIGHTS. We have executed a Registration
Rights Agreement with certain of the investors in our private placements
covering the shares of our common stock purchased by the investors and the
shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants and any

                                       14





<PAGE>

other securities issued or issuable at any time or from time to time in respect
of our common stock as a result of a merger, consolidation, reorganization,
stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or other similar event involving
Entech (the "Registrable Securities").

         Provided that the Registrable Securities have not been registered, if
at any time after the date of the Investor Registration Rights Agreement, but
before the third anniversary of the date thereof, we propose to register any of
our securities under the Securities Act, other than by a registration in
connection with an acquisition in a manner which would not permit registration
of the Registrable Securities for sale to the public, on Form S-8, or any
successor form thereto, on Form S-4, or any successor form thereto, on an
underwritten basis (either "best-efforts" or "firm-commitment"), then, we will
give prompt written notice to the investor of our intention to do so and of the
investor's rights under the Investor Registration Rights Agreement.

         Upon the written request of the investor made within 10 days after the
receipt of any such notice (which request shall specify the Registrable
Securities intended to be disposed of by the investor and the intended method of
disposition thereof), we will, subject to the terms of the Investor Registration
Rights Agreement, use our commercially reasonable best efforts to effect the
registration under the Securities Act of the Registrable Securities, to the
extent requisite to permit the disposition (in accordance with the intended
methods thereof as aforesaid) of the Registrable Securities so to be registered,
by inclusion of the Registrable Securities in a registration statement filed by
us on Form S-1, SB-2, or S-3, or some other similar form pursuant to the
Securities Act to register the securities which we propose to register, provided
that if, at any time after written notice of our intention to register any
securities and prior to the effective date of the registration statement filed
in connection with such registration, we determine for any reason either not to
register or to delay registration of such securities, we may, at our election,
give written notice of such determination to the investor and, thereupon:

o        In the case of a determination not to register, we will be relieved of
         the obligation to register any Registrable Securities in connection
         with such registration (but not from our obligation to pay the
         registration expenses in connection therewith); and

o        In the case of a determination to delay registering, we will be
         permitted to delay registering any Registrable Securities, for the same
         period as the delay in registering such other securities.

         If the managing underwriter of the underwritten offering contemplated
by the Investor Registration Rights Agreement informs Entech and the investor of
its belief that the number of securities requested to be included in such
registration exceeds the number which can be sold in such offering, then we will
include in such registration, to the extent of the number which we are so
advised can be sold in such offering:

o        First, securities proposed by us to be sold for our own account; and

o        Second, Registrable Securities and securities of other selling security
         holders requested to be included in such registration pro rata on the
         basis of the number of shares of such securities so proposed to be sold
         and so requested to be included; provided, however, the investor shall
         have pro rata rights of registration with all shares sought to be
         included by officers and directors of Entech as well as holders of 10
         percent or more of our common stock.

         Subject to such other reasonable requirements as may be imposed by the
underwriter as a condition of inclusion of the Registrable Securities in the
registration statement, the investor will agree by acquisition of the
Registrable Securities, if so required by the managing underwriter, not to sell,
make any short sale of, loan, grant any option for the purchase of, effect any
public sale or distribution of or otherwise dispose of, except as part of such
underwritten registration, any equity securities of Entech, during such
reasonable period of time requested by the underwriter; provided however:

o        The secondary offering is intended to raise a minimum of $8,000,000 on
         behalf of Entech; and

o        Such period shall not exceed the 90 day period commencing with the
         completion of an underwritten offering.

                                       15





<PAGE>

         We will agree that during any holdback period, the investor may sell,
in the holdback period, Registrable Securities in the amount of up to one
percent per week of the shares of our common stock held by the investor as long
as the Investor Registration Rights Agreement remains effective.

         The investor may not participate in any underwritten offering under the
Investor Registration Rights Agreement unless the investor agrees to sell its
securities on the basis provided in any underwriting arrangements approved, by
the investor.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

         During 2003, we did not issue any unregistered equity securities:

         However, on January 21, 2004, in connection with the stock exchange
between Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Cyber Public Relations, Inc., we
issued 9,550,000 shares of our common stock to the stockholders of Environmental
Technologies, Inc.

         The shares were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All of the
investors took their securities for investment purposes without a view to
distribution and had access to information concerning Entech and our business
prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         On January 23, 2004, we issued to Barron Partners LP 2,000,000 shares
of common stock and warrants for the purchase of 7,165,000 shares of our common
stock, in exchange for $2,000,000 in cash. The investor took its securities for
investment purposes without a view to distribution and had access to information
concerning Entech and our business prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         On January 23, 2004, in connection with the investment by Barron
Partners LP, we issued warrants for the purchase of our 475,375 shares of common
stock to affiliates of a broker-dealer which arranged the investment by Barron
Partners LP. Each of the warrant holders took its securities for investment
purposes without a view to distribution and had access to information concerning
Entech and our business prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         From January 12, 2004, through March 24, 2004, pursuant to a private
placement to Accredited Investors, we issued to 12 investors, in exchange for
$520,000 in cash, 260,000 shares of our common stock and warrants for the
purchase of 260,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per
share, and warrants for the purchase of 260,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $3.00 per share. The investors took their securities for
investment purposes without a view to distribution and had access to information
concerning Entech and our business prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         On March 25, 2004, pursuant to a private placement to Accredited
Investors, we issued to one investor, in exchange for $240,000 in cash, 160,000
shares of our common stock. The investor took his securities for investment
purposes without a view to distribution and had access to information concerning
Entech and our business prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         On March 26, 2004, in connection with the investment by the Accredited
Investor on March 25, 2004, we issued warrants for the purchase of 17,600
shares of our common stock to a broker-dealer which arranged the investment by
the investor. The warrant holder took its securities for investment purposes
without a view to distribution and had access to information concerning Entech
and our business prospects, as required by the Securities Act.

         In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising for the
purchase of our shares. Our securities were sold only to persons with whom we
had a direct personal preexisting relationship, and after a thorough discussion.
Finally, our stock transfer agent has been instructed not to transfer any of
such shares, unless such shares are registered for resale or there is an
exemption with respect to their transfer.

                                       16





<PAGE>

SECTION 15(g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

         The shares of our common stock are covered by Section 15(g) of the
Exchange Act, and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-6 promulgated thereunder, which impose
additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities
to persons other than established customers and accredited investors.
         Rule 15g-2 declares unlawful any broker-dealer transactions in "penny
stocks" unless the broker-dealer has first provided to the customer a
standardized disclosure document.

         Rule 15g-3 provides that it is unlawful for a broker-dealer to engage
in a "penny stock" transaction unless the broker-dealer first discloses and
subsequently confirms to the customer the current quotation prices or similar
market information concerning the penny stock in question.

         Rule 15g-4 prohibits broker-dealers from completing "penny stock"
transactions for a customer unless the broker-dealer first discloses to the
customer the amount of compensation or other remuneration received as a result
of the penny stock transaction.

         Rule 15g-5 requires that a broker-dealer executing a "penny stock"
transaction, other than one exempt under Rule 15g-1, disclose to its customer,
at the time of or prior to the transaction, information about the sales person's
compensation.

         Our common stock may be subject to the foregoing rules. The application
of the "penny stock" rules may affect our stockholders' ability to sell their
shares because some broker-dealers may not be willing to make a market in our
common stock because of the burdens imposed upon them by the "penny stock"
rules.

ITEM 6.      MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information:

         This document includes forward-looking statements. All statements other
than statements of historical fact included in this document, including, without
limitation, the statements under "Plan of Operations" regarding our strategies,
plans, objectives, expectations, and future operating results are
forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected
in such forward-looking statements are reasonable at this time, we can give no
assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results
could differ materially based upon a number of factors including, but not
limited to, the state of the economy, competition, unanticipated business
opportunities, availability of financing, market acceptance, government
regulation, dependence on key personnel, limited public market and liquidity,
shares eligible for future sale, and other risks that may apply to us.

         The following is a discussion of the financial condition and results of
our operations as of the date of this Annual Report. This discussion and
analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited Financial
Statements including the Notes thereto which are included elsewhere in this Form
10-KSB.

Critical Accounting Policies

         The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us
to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future
events, however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and
assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in footnotes to
the accompanying financial statements.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS

         The plan of operations for Cyber Public Relations which existed before
the exchange with Entech is no longer applicable. Please see Item 1 of this
Annual Report for the discussion of our plan of operation going forward since
January 21, 2004.

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

         Before the exchange with Entech, we had not launched our operations.
Activity during the past year was confined to testing the viability of our
business model and the identification of markets and development of products.
Please see Item 1 of this Annual Report for the discussion of our proposed
future operations going forward since January 21, 2004.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

         The following discussion relates to our activities for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2003 as Cyber Public Relations, Inc.

         We had a net loss of $6,029 in 2003 as compared to a net loss of
$34,774 in 2002. The decrease in loss is due to a reduction in general and
administrative expenses as we continued minimum operations until additional
financing could be achieved and full sales and marketing operations could be
launched.

         As a result of our operating loss of $69,209 from our inception on June
29, 1998 through December 31, 2003, we incurred a cash flow deficit of $32,524
from operating activities, adjusted principally for accrued liabilities of
$14,935 and equity based compensation of $21,500. We met our cash requirements
during this period through the receipt of $9,054 of cash advanced from our
president as well as $35,000 from an entity controlled by our president.

         At the fiscal year end, our current liabilities exceeded our current
assets by $47,219.

                                       17





<PAGE>

FUTURE OPERATIONS

         Please see Item 1 of this Annual Report for the discussion of our
proposed future operations going forward since January 21, 2004.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

         Please see Item 1 of this Annual Report for the discussion of our
proposed operations going forward since January 21, 2004.

New Accounting Pronouncements
-----------------------------

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities." Interpretation 46 changes the criteria by which one
company includes another entity in its consolidated financial statements.
Previously, the criteria were based on control through voting interest.
Interpretation 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a
company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the
variable interest entity's activities or entitled to receive a majority of the
entity's residual returns or both. A company that consolidates a variable
interest entity is called the primary beneficiary of that entity. The
consolidation requirements of Interpretation 46 apply immediately to variable
interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements
apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning
after June 15, 2003. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all
financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the
variable interest entity was established. The Company does not expect the
adoption to have a material impact to the Company's financial position or
results of operations.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement No.149, " Amendment of Statement of 133
on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ", which amends Statement 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. The
adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position.

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised), EMPLOYERS' DISCLOSURES
ABOUT PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS - AN AMENDMENT OF FASB
STATEMENTS NO. 87, 88, AND 106. This statement retains the disclosure
requirements contained in FASB statement no. 132, Employers' Disclosures about
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, which it replaces. It requires
additional disclosures to those in the original statement 132 about the assets,
obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The required
information should be provided separately for pension plans and for other
postretirement benefit plans. The revision applies for the first fiscal or
annual interim period ending after December 15, 2003 for domestic pension plans
and June 15, 2004 for foreign pension plans and requires certain new disclosures
related to such plans. The adoption of this statement will not have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations or financial positions.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

         We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7.      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

         The financial statements and related notes are included as part of this
Annual Report as indexed in the appendix on page F-1 through F-16.

ITEM 8.      CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

         None.

ITEM 8A.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

         Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

         EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE AND CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. As of the end of
the period covered by this Annual Report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

         CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. There was no
change in our internal controls, which are included within disclosure controls
and procedures, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls.

                                       18





<PAGE>

                                    PART III

ITEM 9.      DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
             COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

         As of December 31, 2003, the following table furnishes the information
concerning our directors and officers.

   NAME                   AGE              POSITION               DIRECTOR SINCE
   ----                   ---              --------               --------------
Maria Trinh               35       President, Secretary,
                                   Treasurer and Director

         Maria Trinh graduated from the University of British Columbia with a
Fine Arts Degree in 1991. In 1995 she worked for Advanced Cultural Technologies,
a software development company in Vancouver, British Columbia. For the past five
years she has been a free-lance artist, taking up jewelry design in early 1998
commensurate with the founding of Galaxyblue Jewelry. As a small business owner,
Ms. Trinh saw the need and the potential in helping to bring e-commerce
solutions to small and medium sized businesses. Since our inception, Ms. Trinh
has been working on developing a viable e-commerce solutions business model.

         Mrs. Trinh resigned as an officer and director on January 21, 2004.

         The following table sets forth information concerning the directors and
executive officers of Entech as of the date of this Annual Report:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   NAME                 AGE                         POSITION                        DIRECTOR SINCE
                   ----                 ---                         --------                        --------------
      <S>                                <C>       <C>                                                   <C>
      Steven D. Rosenthal, Ed.D.         51           Chief Executive Officer and Director               2001
      Robert K. Christie                 37           Chief Operating Officer and Director               2003
      Bret Covey                         38               Vice President and Director                    2003
      Douglas L. Parker                  39               Vice President and Director                    2003
      Burr Northrop                      40        Vice President of Development and Director            2003
      Edward W. Link                     60                         Director                             2004
      Barbara Tainter                    50                 Chief Financial Officer                      N/A
      William F. Greene                  48           Vice President of Investor Relations               N/A
</TABLE>

         The members of our board of directors are subject to change from time
to time by the vote of the stockholders at special or annual meetings to elect
directors. The number of the directors may be fixed from time to time by
resolution duly passed by our board. Each director is elected for a period of
one year at the annual meeting of our stockholders, and will hold office for the
term for which elected and until his successor is elected and qualified or until
his earlier death, resignation or removal. Vacancies and newly created
directorships resulting from any increase in the number of authorized directors
may generally be filled by a majority of the directors then remaining in office.
The directors elect officers annually. There are no family relationships among
the directors and officers of Entech.

         We may employ additional management personnel, as our board of
directors deems necessary. Entech has not identified or reached an agreement or
understanding with any other individuals to serve in management positions, but
does not anticipate any problem in employing qualified staff.

         A description of the business experience during the past several years
for each of the directors and executive officers of Entech is set forth below.

                                       19





<PAGE>

         Steven D. Rosenthal, Ed.D. has served as chief executive officer of
Christie-Peterson Development since March 2002 and as chairman of the board
since 2001. Prior to joining Christie-Peterson Development, Dr. Rosenthal served
as chief operating officer and president of The Majestic Companies, Ltd., a
publicly traded holding company with operations in modular building construction
and transportation safety products, from 1997 until 2002.

         Prior to founding Christie-Peterson Development in 1995, Robert K.
Christie served in senior positions managing commercial and residential
construction projects, including vice president of the Anden Group and as vice
president of Topa Savings and Loan.

         Before joining Christie-Peterson Development in June 2001 as executive
vice president, from 1987 to 2001, Bret Covey was chief executive officer and
president of H.B. Covey, Inc.

         Douglas L. Parker has over 14 years experience related to the hazardous
waste industry. He has served as president and chief executive officer of
Advanced Fuel Filtrations Systems, Inc. since 1998.

         Burr Northrop, before recently joining Christie-Peterson Development,
managed compliance programs and fuel system renovations at Connor Environmental,
served as president of Kaliber Construction and Engineering. Since 1992, he has
served as president of H.B. Covey, Inc.

         Edward W. Link, since 1976, has been president and chief executive
officer of Link-Allen & Associates, Inc., insurance brokers.

         Barbara Tainter joined Christie-Peterson Development in October 2002.
Ms. Tainter was controller of Duncan Brothers from 1994 until 2002.

         William F. Greene joined Entech in February 2004. He previously
performed consulting services for Resources Connection from 1999 through 2001.
Thereafter, he had his consulting services for various clients where he provided
planning and acquisition services. Mr. Greene has 24 years of experience in
finance and accounting.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

         Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our directors and certain of
our officers, and persons holding more than 10 percent of our common stock are
required to file forms reporting their beneficial ownership of our common stock
and subsequent changes in that ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such persons are also required to furnish us with copies of all
forms so filed.

         Based solely upon a review of copies of such forms filed on Forms 3, 4,
and 5, and amendments thereto furnished to us, we believe that during the year
ended December 31, 2003, our executive officers, directors and greater than 10
percent beneficial owners complied on a timely basis with all Section 16(a)
filing requirements.

                                       20





<PAGE>

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. Our board of directors has created a
compensation committee. However, no members of the committee have been appointed
and the committee has not been formally organized. The compensation committee
will make recommendations to the board of directors concerning salaries and
compensation for our executive officers and employees. We have adopted a charter
for the compensation committee.

         AUDIT COMMITTEE. Our board of directors has created an audit committee
which is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight
of the work of any registered public accounting firm employed by us (including
resolution of disagreements between our management and the auditor regarding
financial disclosure) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or
related work. The audit committee will also review and evaluate our internal
control functions. However, no members of the committee have been appointed and
the committee has not been formally organized. We have adopted a charter for the
audit committee.

CHANGE IN CONTROL

         On January 21, 2004, as a direct result of the transaction referred to
in Item 1 hereof, Steven D. Rosenthal, Robert K. Christie, and Douglas L.
Parker, stockholders of Environmental Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("Entech"), and on January 21, 2004, as a direct result of the transaction
referred to in Item 1 hereof, Barron Partners LP, became "control persons" of
Cyber Public Relations as that term is defined in the Securities Act.

         The status of Messrs. Rosenthal, Christie, and Parker as control
persons arose from the issuance of an aggregate of 9,550,000 shares of the
common stock of Cyber Public Relations (approximately 96.81 percent of the total
issued and outstanding shares) to the 12 stockholders of Entech (three of whom
were Messrs. Rosenthal, Christie, and Parker) in exchange for all of the
stockholders' shares of the Entech common stock. As a result of the exchange,
Entech became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cyber Public Relations. Additionally,
with the consummation of the transactions referred to in Item 1 of this Annual
Report, Ms. Maria Trinh, the sole officer and director of Cyber Public Relations
prior to the transaction described below, resigned her positions as an officer
and director of Cyber Public Relations. Steven D. Rosenthal, Robert K. Christie,
Barbara Tainter, Bret Covey, and Douglas L. Parker were elected directors in her
place and stead.

         On January 21, 2004, the new board of directors elected the following
officers:

                  OFFICE                           NAME                 AGE
                  ------                           ----                 ---

         Chief Executive Officer        Steven D. Rosenthal, Ed.D.       51
         Chief Operating Officer            Robert K. Christie           37
         Chief Financial Officer              Barbara Tainter            50
              Vice President                    Bret Covey               38
              Vice President                 Douglas L. Parker           39
      Vice President of Development            Burr Northrop             40

         On January 28, 2004, the board elected Edward W. Link to the board of
directors.

         On February 16, 2004, the board elected William F. Greene as vice
president of investor relations.

         The status of Barron Partners LP as a control person arose as result of
the acquisition on January 21, 2004 of 2,000,000 shares of the Registrant's
common stock and 7,150,000 warrants to acquire shares of our common stock.

                                       21





<PAGE>

         SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. The
following table sets forth, as of March 28, 2004, information concerning
ownership of our securities by:

o        Each person who owns beneficially more than five percent of the
         outstanding shares of our common stock;

o        Each director;

o        Each named executive officer; and

o        All directors and officers as a group.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED (2)
                                                                             -----------------------------
                      NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER (1)                            NUMBER            PERCENT
                      ----------------------------                            ------            -------
<S>                                                                          <C>                   <C>
Steven D. Rosenthal, Ed.D.............................................       1,001,500             4.89%
Robert K. Christie....................................................       3,750,175            18.34%
Barbara Tainter.......................................................         250,000             1.22%
Bret Covey............................................................         650,500             3.18%
Burr Northrop.........................................................         500,000             2.44%
Douglas L. Parker.....................................................       1,250,000             6.11%
Edward W. Link........................................................             -0-               -0-
William F. Greene.....................................................             200              -0-*
                                                                             ---------            ------
All directors and executive officers as a group (eight persons).......       7,402,375            36.18%
                                                                             =========            ======
Barron Partners LP (3)................................................       9,150,000            44.75%
</TABLE>

----------------
*     Less than one percent.
(1)   Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of these stockholders is
      c/o Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc., 8513 Rochester Avenue, Rancho
      Cucamonga, California 91730. Also, unless otherwise indicated, each person
      named in the table above has the sole voting and investment power with
      respect to our shares of common stock which he or she beneficially owns.
(2)   Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
      Securities and Exchange Commission. As of the date of this Annual Report,
      there were issued and outstanding 12,285,000 shares of our common stock
      and 7,625,375 warrants for the purchase of shares of our common stock, all
      of which are immediately exercisable, 7,150,000 of which are in favor of
      Barron Partners LP.
(3)   Barron Partners LP, whose address is 730 Fifth Avenue, 9th Floor, New
      York, New York 10019, owns 2,000,000 shares of our common stock and
      warrants for the purchase of 7,150,000 shares of our common stock.

         There are no arrangements, known to us, including any pledge by any
person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result
in a change in control of Entech.

         There are no arrangements or understandings among members of both the
former and the new control groups and their associates with respect to election
of directors or other matters.

         The foregoing description of the transactions is qualified in its
entirety to the information contained in Item 2 of this Annual Report and the
full text of the Capital Stock Exchange Agreement, previously filed by us as an
exhibit to a Current Report on Form 8-K.

CODE OF ETHICS

         We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is
designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

o        Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or
         apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
         relationships;

o        Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports
         and documents that we file with, or submits to, the SEC and in other
         public communications made by us;

                                       22





<PAGE>

o        Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

o        The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an
         appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

o        Accountability for adherence to the code.

         A copy of our code of ethics that applies to our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions is attached to this Annual
Report as an exhibit. We have filed with the SEC a copy of the code of ethics
attached hereto. We will post a copy of the code of ethics on our website at
www.goentech.com, as soon as we complete construction of the site.

         We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of
our code of ethics. Any such request should be directed to our corporate
secretary at 8513 Rochester Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,
telephone number (909) 912-0828.

ITEM 10.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

         The following table provides certain summary information concerning the
compensation earned by the named executive officers (determined as of the end of
the last fiscal year) for services rendered in all capacities to Cyber Public
Relations, Inc. and our subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, before the exchange with Entech on January 21, 2004.

<TABLE>
                                               SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<CAPTION>

                                           ANNUAL COMPENSATION                LONG TERM COMPENSATION
                                   --------------------------------    ------------------------------------
                                                                                AWARDS            PAYOUTS
                                                                       -------------------------- --------
                                                                       RESTRICTED    SECURITIES
                                   SALARY   BONUS      OTHER ANNUAL      STOCK       UNDERLYING     LTIP       ALL OTHER
   NAME AND PRINCIPAL                                  COMPENSATION     AWARD(S)    OPTIONS/SARS   PAYOUTS   COMPENSATION
        POSITION            YEAR     ($)      ($)           ($)            ($)           (#)         ($)          ($)
-------------------------- ------- -------- --------- ---------------- ----------- -------------- --------- ---------------
<S>                         <C>       <C>      <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
Maria Trinh                 2003      0        0             0             0             0           0            0
President, Treasurer        2002      0        0             0             0             0           0            0
Secretary and Director      2001      0        0             0             0             0           0            0
-------------------------- ------- -------- --------- ---------------- ----------- -------------- --------- ---------------
</TABLE>

         Before December 31, 2003, we had no long-term incentive compensation
plan for our executive officers and employees. We do not award stock
appreciation rights or long term incentive plan pay-outs.

OPTIONS GRANTED TO EMPLOYEES IN FISCAL 2003

         No stock options were granted to employees during fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

         In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, we paid no compensation to
our directors for their services as directors.

                                       23





<PAGE>

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

         Prior to the exchange between Cyber Public Relations and Entech we did
not have any employment agreements with any of our officers or employees.
However, on December 15, 2003, Entech entered into employment agreements with
Steven D. Rosenthal, Robert K. Christie, Douglas L. Parker, and James L. Christ,
one of our significant employees. Each agreement terminates on November 30,
2006. The basic terms of each agreement are as follows:

o        Dr. Rosenthal will receive a salary of $360,000 per year, plus bonuses,
         cost of living increases, and other benefits. The agreement may be
         renewed. In addition, Dr. Rosenthal received 1,000,000 shares of our
         common stock upon execution of his agreement. Moreover, Dr. Rosenthal
         will receive 250,000 shares of our common stock beginning on the second
         year of his contract and subsequently with each renewal of the
         agreement. The 250,000 shares and the shares to be received upon
         renewal of the agreement will be subject to a registration rights
         agreement, which are the same as those afforded to investors in our
         private placements.

o        Mr. Christie will receive a salary of $300,000 per year, plus bonuses,
         cost of living increases, and other benefits. The agreement may be
         renewed. In addition, Mr. Christie received 1,000,000 shares of our
         common stock upon execution of his agreement. Moreover, Mr. Christie
         will receive 200,000 shares of our common stock beginning on the second
         year of his contract and subsequently with each renewal of the
         agreement. The 200,000 shares and the shares to be received upon
         renewal of the agreement will be subject to a registration rights
         agreement, which are the same as those afforded to investors in our
         private placements.

o        Mr. Parker will receive a salary of $275,000 per year, plus bonuses,
         cost of living increases, and other benefits. The agreement may be
         renewed. In addition, Mr. Parker received 300,000 shares of our common
         stock upon execution of his agreement.

o        Mr. Christ will receive a salary of $156,000 per year, plus bonuses,
         cost of living increases, and other benefits. The agreement may be
         renewed.

ITEM 11.     SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
             RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

         As of December 31, 2003, the following table presents information
regarding the beneficial ownership of all shares of our common stock by:

o        Each person who owns beneficially more than five percent of the
         outstanding shares of our common stock;

o        Each director of Entech;

o        Each named executive officer; and

o        All directors and officers as a group.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     SHARES BENEFICIALLY
                                                                             OWNED (2)
                                                                      ---------------------
               NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER (1)               NUMBER        PERCENT
               ----------------------------------------               ------        -------
<S>                                                                 <C>              <C>
Maria Trinh......................................................   2,000,000        91.0%
All directors and officers as a group (one person)...............   2,000,000        91.0%
</TABLE>

-------------
(1)  Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of these stockholders is
     c/o Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc., 8513 Rochester Avenue, Rancho
     Cucamonga, California 91730. Also, unless otherwise indicated, each person
     named in the table above has the sole voting and investment power with
     respect to his shares of our common stock beneficially owned.
(2)  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC.

         As of the date of this Annual Report, the following table presents
information regarding the beneficial ownership of all shares of our common stock
by:

                                       24





<PAGE>

o        Each person who owns beneficially more than five percent of the
         outstanding shares of our common stock;

o        Each director of Entech;

o        Each named executive officer; and

o        All directors and officers as a group.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED (2)
                                                                             -----------------------------
                      NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER (1)                            NUMBER            PERCENT
                      ----------------------------                            ------            -------
<S>                                                                          <C>                   <C>
Steven D. Rosenthal, Ed.D.............................................       1,001,500             5.08%
Robert K. Christie....................................................       3,750,175            19.01%
Barbara Tainter.......................................................         250,000             1.27%
Bret Covey............................................................         650,500             3.30%
Burr Northrop.........................................................         500,000             2.53%
Douglas L. Parker.....................................................       1,250,000             6.37%
Edward W. Link........................................................             -0-               -0-
William F. Greene.....................................................             200              -0-*
                                                                             ---------            ------
All directors and executive officers as a group (eight persons)........       7,402,375            37.53%
                                                                             =========            ======
Barron Partners LP (3)................................................       9,150,000            46.39%
</TABLE>

-------------
*     Less than one percent.
(1)   Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of these stockholders is
      c/o Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc., 8513 Rochester Avenue, Rancho
      Cucamonga, California 91730. Also, unless otherwise indicated, each person
      named in the table above has the sole voting and investment power with
      respect to our shares of common stock which he or she beneficially owns.
(2)   Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
      Securities and Exchange Commission. As of the date of this Annual Report,
      there were issued and outstanding 12,285,000 shares of our common stock
      and 7,625,375 warrants for the purchase of shares of our common stock, all
      of which are immediately exercisable, 7,150,000 of which are in favor of
      Barron Partners LP.
(3)   Barron Partners LP, whose address is 730 Fifth Avenue, 9th Floor, New
      York, New York 10019, owns 2,000,000 shares of our common stock and
      warrants for the purchase of 7,150,000 shares of our common stock.

ITEM 12.     CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

         Before December 31, 2003 there were no related transactions involving
the officers and directors of Cyber Public Relations, Inc. However, following
the exchange with Entech, we lease from Robert K. Christie, our chief operating
officer, director and a controlling stockholder, approximately 23,000 square
feet of warehouse/office space in Rancho Cucamonga, California for an annual
rental of $168,000. The lease expires in December 2013. In addition, we lease
from Burr Northrop, one of our officers and a controlling stockholders,
approximately 8,000 square feet of warehouse space in Chino, California for an
annual rental of $54,000. That lease expires in 2005.

         We have closed triangular mergers with Christie-Peterson Development,
H.B. Covey, Inc., and Advanced Fuel Filtration Systems, Inc. Most of the
principal officers, directors, and controlling stockholders of the merged
companies occupy similar positions with Entech.

         CHRISTIE-PETERSON DEVELOPMENT. In December 2003, we merged our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Parr Sub One, Inc. into Christie-Peterson Development,
a California corporation, wholly-owned by Robert K. Christie, our chief
operating officer and a controlling stockholder and one of our directors. As a
result of the merger, Mr. Christie received 2,500,000 shares of our common stock
having an agreed value of $5,000,000.00 in exchange for all of his shares of the
common stock of Christie-Peterson, which was the surviving corporation and
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entech. Our shares transferred to Mr.
Christie contained a legend restricting the transfer thereof as required by the
Securities Act.

         We have a "call" (the "Call") on the 2,500,000 shares of our common
stock received by Mr. Christie in connection with the merger at a price of $2.50
per share, payable in cash. The Call may be exercised in whole or in part on or
before June 30, 2004. To the extent that the Call is not fully exercised before
June 30, 2004, Mr. Christie has a "put" (the "Put") on our shares that have not
been purchased pursuant to the Call. The Put may be exercised in whole or in
part at any time after June 30, 2004 and before December 31, 2004, and shall be
at a price of $2.50 per share. The purchase price for any such shares purchased

                                       25





<PAGE>

pursuant to the Put may be paid either in cash or by means of a promissory note,
bearing no interest, and due on or before December 31, 2004 (the "Note"). The
Note will be secured by a pledge of such shares until the Note is paid in full.
As long as there is no default with respect to the Note, the shares will be
deemed to be cancelled, subject to reissuance if there is a default in the
payment of the Note, and will carry no voting rights.

         Before the merger with Parr Sub One, Christie-Peterson owed Robert K.
Christie the sum of $205,000, which amount remains outstanding.

         H.B. COVEY, INC. In December 2003, we merged our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Parr Sub Three, Inc. into H.B. Covey, Inc., a California
corporation, owned by Burr Northrop, one of our vice presidents, Robert K.
Christie, and Bret Covey, one of our vice presidents and a director. As a result
of the merger, Messrs. Northrop, Christie, and Covey received 750,000 shares of
our common stock having an agreed value of $1,500,000.00 in exchange for all of
their shares of the common stock of H.B. Covey, which was the surviving
corporation and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Entech. Mr. Northrop
received 250,000 shares, Mr. Christie received 250,000 shares, and Mr. Covey
received 250,000 shares. Our shares transferred to Messrs. Northrop, Christie,
and Covey contained legends restricting the transfer thereof as required by the
Securities Act.

         As additional consideration for the merger, we delivered to Messrs.
Northrop, Christie, and Covey the sum of $1,000,000, payable pursuant to a
promissory note due on June 30, 2004. On the effective date of the merger, we
assumed all of the outstanding liabilities of H.B. Covey totaling $1,430,442 as
of that date.

         Before the merger with Parr Sub Three, H.B. Covey owed Bret Covey the
sum of $247,147 and Burr Northrup the sum of $570,091. The amounts owed to
Messrs. Covey and Northrup were paid as a result of the delivery of the
$1,000,000 promissory note delivered by Entech in connection with the merger.

         ADVANCED FUEL FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. In December 2003, we merged our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Parr Sub Two, Inc. into Advanced Fuel Filtration
Systems, Inc., a California corporation, owned by Douglas L. Parker, one of our
vice presidents and directors, James R. Christ, one of our key employees, Grover
G. Moss, and Donald G. St. Clair. As a result of the merger, Messrs. Parker,
Christ, Moss, and St. Clair received 2,000,000 shares of our common stock having
an agreed value of $4,000,000.00 in exchange for all of their shares of the
common stock of AFFS, which was the surviving corporation and became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Entech. Mr. Parker received 950,000 shares, and Mr.
Christ received 100,000 shares. Our shares transferred to Messrs. Parker,
Christ, Moss, and St. Clair contained legends restricting the transfer thereof
as required by the Securities Act.

         As additional consideration for the merger:

o        We delivered to the stockholders of AFFS on the effective date of the
         merger with Parr Sub Two the sum of $1,000,000.00, payable pursuant to
         a promissory note due on June 30, 2004.

o        It was acknowledged that we made an advance to AFFS of $250,000.00
         which was applied against debts owing by AFFS as of November 14, 2003.

o        The stockholders of AFFS assigned to us all of their shares of the
         capital stock of Advanced Petroleum Transport, Inc., a California
         corporation, which shares were all of the issued and outstanding shares
         of the capital stock of Advanced Petroleum Transport, Inc.

o        We assumed all of the AFFS Third Party Liability Debts totaling
         $4,484,066 previously disclosed by AFFS to us pursuant to that certain
         Letter of Intent with respect to the Merger dated October 31, 2003
         between us and AFFS (the "Third Party Liability Debts").

o        We agreed that we would attempt to cause the
         release of all continuing guaranties of the stockholders of AFFS in
         connection with the AFFS third party liability debts.

                                       26





<PAGE>

TRANSACTIONS WITH INTERESTED DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

         Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that a director or
officer may enter into contracts or arrangements or have dealings with us, and
shall not be disqualified as a director or officer thereby, nor shall he be
liable to account to us for any profit arising out of any such contracts,
arrangements or dealings to which he is a party in which he is interested by
reason by his being at the same time a director or officer of Entech, nor shall
any such contract or transaction be void or voidable solely for this reason, or
solely because such director or officer is present at or participates in the
meeting of our board of directors, or a committee thereof, which authorizes any
such contract or transaction, or solely because his vote is counted for such
purpose, provided that:

o        The material facts as to his relationship or interest and as to the
         contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to our board of
         directors or the committee, and the board or committee, as the case may
         be, in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the
         affirmative votes of a majority of the disinterested directors, even
         though the disinterested directors be less than a quorum; or

o        The material facts as to his relationship or interest and as to the
         contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the stockholders
         entitled to vote thereon, and the contract or transaction is
         specifically approved in good faith by vote of the stockholders; or

o        The contract or transaction is fair as to Entech as of the time it is
         authorized, approved or ratified, by our board of directors, a
         committee thereof, or our stockholders.

ITEM 13.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a)      Exhibits

         The following exhibits are hereby filed as part of this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB or incorporated by reference.

 EXHIBIT NO.                IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
 -----------                -------------------------
  3.1 *         Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
  3.2 *         By-laws of the Registrant
  10.1*         Convertible note dated March 14, 2002
  10.2*         Convertible note dated March 28, 2002
  14 **         Code of Ethics
  31.1 **       Certification of Steven D. Rosenthal, President and Chief
                Executive Officer of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.302 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2**        Certification of Steven D. Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer
                and Treasurer of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.302 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1**        Certification of Steven D. Rosenthal, President and Chief
                Executive Officer of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2**        Certification of Steven D. Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer
                and Treasurer of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

---------------
*    Previously filed.
**   Filed herewith.

                                       27





<PAGE>

         (b)      Reports on Form 8-K.

         We did not file any current reports on Form 8-K during the reporting
period.

         On January 28, 2004 we file a Form 8-K reporting a change of control,
the acquisition of material assets, and the private placement by Barron Partners
LP.

ITEM 14.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

AUDIT FEES

         The aggregate fees billed by Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial
statements for fiscal year 2002 were $4,797. The aggregate fees billed by
Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP for professional services rendered for
the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year 2003 were $10,100.

ALL OTHER FEES

         There were no other fees billed by Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani
LLP for professional services rendered, other than as stated under the captions
Audit Fees.

                                       28





<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                      ENTECH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: March 30, 2004
                                      By /s/ Steven D. Rosenthal
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                          Steven D. Rosenthal,
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this Annual Report has been signed by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           SIGNATURE                                 TITLE                              DATE
           ---------                                 -----                              ----

<S>                                     <C>                                          <C>
  /s/ Steven D. Rosenthal               Chief Executive Officer and Director         March 30, 2004
----------------------------
STEVEN D. ROSENTHAL

  /s/ Robert K. Christie                Chief Operating Officer and Director         March 30, 2004
----------------------------
ROBERT K. CHRISTIE

  /s/ Barbara Tainter                          Chief Financial Officer               March 30, 2004
----------------------------
BARBARA TAINTER

  /s/ Bret Covey                             Vice President and Director             March 30, 2004
----------------------------
BRET COVEY

  /s/ Douglas L. Parker                      Vice President and Director             March 30, 2004
----------------------------
DOUGLAS L. PARKER

  /s/ Burr Northrop                       Vice President of Development and          March 30, 2004
----------------------------                          Director
BURR NORTHROP

  /s/ Edward W. Link                                  Director                       March 30, 2004
----------------------------
EDWARD W. LINK

  /s/ William F. Greene                 Vice President of Investor Relations         March 30, 2004
----------------------------
WILLIAM F. GREENE

</TABLE>

                                                      29





<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

                           DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

                         FORMING A PART OF ANNUAL REPORT

                 PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC.

                                      F-1





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS INC.

                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                                                        Page No.
                                                                        --------

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants                        F-3

Balance Sheet at December 31, 2003 and 2002                               F-4

Statement of Losses for the years ended of December 31, 2003 and 2002     F-5
and for the period June 29, 1998 (date of inception) through
December 31, 2003

Statement of Deficiency in Stockholders' Equity for the period June 29, 1998
(date of inception)  through
   December 31, 2003                                              F-6

Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002    F-7
and for the period June 29, 1998 (date of inception) through
December 31, 2003
Notes to Financial Statements                                        F-8 to F-16

                                      F-2





<PAGE>

                    RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
Cyber Public Relations, Inc
Rancho Cucamonga, California

 We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cyber Public Relations, Inc,
(the "Company", a development stage company) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002
and the related statements of losses, deficiency in stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the two years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based upon
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Cyber Public Relations, Inc
(development stage company) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for the two years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. We express no opinion on the cumulative period from
inception through December 31, 2000.

                                 /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                      RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                           Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
March 8, 2004

                                      F-3





<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                             CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC.
                                            (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                                                    BALANCE SHEETS
                                           AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     2003        2002
                                         ASSETS
<S>                                                                                <C>         <C>
Current Assets:
Cash                                                                               $ 11,770    $ 12,565

                                                                               -------------------------
                                  Total Current Assets                             $ 11,770    $ 12,565
                                                                               =========================

LIABILITIES AND DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Accrued Expenses and Liabilities                                                   $ 14,935    $ 12,029
Officer Advances  (Note B)                                                            9,054       6,726
Notes payable ( Note C )                                                             35,000           -
                                                                               -------------------------
    TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                                                        58,989      18,755
                                                                               =========================

Notes payable ( Note C )                                                                  -      35,000

DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY:
Preferred Stock, par value, $ .001 per share; authorized 10,000,000
shares; None issued and outstanding                                                       -           -
Common Stock, par value, $ .001 per share; authorized 100,000,000
shares; 2,199,000 issued and outstanding                                              2,199       2,199
Additional Paid in Capital                                                           19,791      19,791
Accumulated Deficit                                                                 (69,209)    (63,180)
                                                                               -------------------------
Total deficiency in stockholder's equity                                            (47,219)    (41,190)
                                                                               =========================

                                                                               -------------------------
                                                                                   $ 11,770    $ 12,565
                                                                               =========================
</TABLE>

                               (See accompanying notes to financial statements)

                                                     F-4





<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                               CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                                              (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                                                   STATEMENT OF LOSSES
                                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
<CAPTION>

                                                                                           For the period 1998
                                                                For the         For the        from June 29,
                                                              year ended       year ended   (date of inception)
                                                                  2003            2002      through December 31, 2003
                                                                  ----            ----      ------------------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>                 <C>
Revenue:
Sales                                                        $         -     $          -        $     6,336
Costs and Expenses:
General and administrative                                         2,472           22,497             59,711
                                                             ------------------------------------------------

Total Operating Expenses                                           2,472           22,497             59,711

Loss from Operations                                              (2,472)         (22,497)           (53,375)

Interest Expenses                                                 (3,557)         (12,277)           (15,834)
Income (taxes) benefit                                                 -                -                  -

Net Loss                                                          (6,029)         (34,774)           (69,209)
                                                             ------------------------------------------------
Loss per common share (basic and assuming dilution)                    -            (0.02)             (0.03)
                                                             ================================================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                     2,199,000        2,199,000          2,199,000

                                    (See accompanying notes to financial statements)
</TABLE>

                                                          F-5





<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                    CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                                                   (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                                          STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
                             FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 29, 1998 (DATE OF INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003
<CAPTION>

                                       Preferred Stock               Common Stock         Additional
                                                                                         Paid In       Accumulated
                                     Shares      Amount        Shares         Amount     Capital         Deficit           Total
                                     ------      ------        ------         ------     -------         -------           -----
<S>                                  <C>     <C>            <C>          <C>            <C>             <C>              <C>
Common shares issued on July 5,
1998 in exchange of services
rendered valued at $.01 per share    --      $     --       2,000,000    $   2,000      $   18,000                       $   20,000

Common shares issued on October
20, 1998 in exchange for debt
valued at $.01 per share             --      $     --          25,000    $      25      $      225      $       --       $      250

Common shares issued on October
20, 1998 for cash at $.01 per
share                                --      $     --          24,000    $      24      $      216      $       --       $      240

Net loss                             --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $  (20,569)      $  (20,569)
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at December 31, 1998         --      $     --       2,049,000    $   2,049      $   18,441      $  (20,569)      $      (79)

Net income                           --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $    1,367       $    1,367
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at December 31, 1999         --      $     --       2,049,000    $   2,049      $   18,441      $  (19,202)      $    1,288

Common shares issued on October
10, 2000 in exchange for
services rendered valued at $.01
per share                            --      $     --         150,000    $     150      $    1,350      $       --       $    1,500

Net loss                             --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $   (1,391)      $   (1,391)
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at December 31, 2000         --      $     --       2,199,000    $   2,199      $   19,791      $  (20,593)      $    1,397

Net loss                             --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $   (7,813)      $   (7,813)
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at December 31, 2001         --      $     --       2,199,000        2,199          19,791         (28,406)      $   (6,416)

Net Loss                             --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $  (34,774)      $  (34,774)
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at December 31, 2002         --      $     --       2,199,000        2,199          19,791         (63,180)         (41,190)

Net loss                             --      $     --              --    $      --      $       --      $   (6,029)      $   (6,029)
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2003         --      $     --       2,199,000    $   2,199      $   19,791      $  (69,209)      $  (47,219)
                                   =================================================================================================

                                       (See accompanying notes to financial statements)
</TABLE>

                                                               F-6





<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                               CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                                              (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                                                STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
<CAPTION>

                                                                                             For the period 1998
                                                                  For the         For the        from June 29,
                                                                 year ended      year ended   (date of inception)
                                                                    2003            2002      through December 31, 2003
                                                                    ----            ----      ------------------
<S>                                                                <C>             <C>                <C>
Cash Flows from operating activities:
Net loss                                                         $ (6,029)      $ (34,774)       $   (69,209)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
To net cash provided by operating activities:
Common Stock issued in exchange for
services rendered                                                       -               -             21,500
Common Stock issued in exchange for debt                                -               -                250
Change in assets and liabilities:
Inventory                                                               -           1,980                  -
Accrued expenses and liabilities                                    2,906          12,029             14,935
Officer's advances                                                  2,328          (1,926)                 -

Net cash used by operating activities                                (795)        (22,691)           (32,524)

Cash Flows from investing activities:                                   -               -

Cash Flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock for cash                                       -               -                240
Advances from shareholder                                               -               -              9,054
Proceeds from note payable                                              -          35,000             35,000

Cash provided by financing activities                                   -          35,000             44,294

Net (decrease) increase in cash                                      (795)         12,309             11,770

Cash- beginning of period                                          12,565             256                  -

                                                         ----------------------------------------------------
Cash -end of period                                              $ 11,770       $  12,565        $    11,770
                                                         ====================================================

Supplemental Disclosures:
Interest paid for the period                                     $      -       $   5,952        $     5,952
Income taxes paid for the period                                        -               -                  -
Common stock issued in exchange of services                             -               -             21,500
Common stock issued in exchange for debt                                -               -               250

                                    (See accompanying notes to financial statements)
</TABLE>

                                                          F-7





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of
the accompanying financial statements follows.

Business and Basis of Presentation
----------------------------------

Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (the "Company") was organized on June 29, 1998,
under the laws of the State of Florida. The Company is currently doing business
on the Internet under the name Galaxyblue Jewelry and intends to acquire and
develop additional complementary and other products to sell online. The Company
also plans to provide a combination of consulting and related services to small
and medium size businesses enabling them to effectively engage in E-commerce.
The Company is in the development stage, as defined by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 7 ("SFAS 7"). To date, the Company has incurred
expenses and has sustained losses. Consequently, its operations are subject to
all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. For
the period from inception through December 31, 2003, the Company has accumulated
losses of $69,209.

Revenue Recognition
-------------------

For revenue from product sales, the Company will recognize revenue in accordance
with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements" ("SAB 101"). SAB 101 requires that four basic criteria must be met
before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and
determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of
criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed
nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectibility of
those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated
returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same
period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which
the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that
the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been
delivered or no refund will be required.

The Company has recognized no revenues from continuing operations during the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Use of Estimates
----------------

The preparation of the financial statement in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly,
actual results could differ from those estimates.

                                      F-8





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Foreign Currency Translation
----------------------------

The Company translates the foreign currency financial statements in accordance
with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52,
"Foreign Currency Translation." Assets and liabilities are translated at current
exchange rates, and related revenue and expenses are translated at average
exchange rates in effect during the period. Resulting translation adjustments
are recorded as a separate component in stockholders' equity. Foreign currency
translation gains and losses are included in the statement of operations.

Cash Equivalents
----------------

For the purpose of the accompanying financial statements, all highly liquid
investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash
equivalents.

Inventories
-----------

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market determined by the specific
identification method.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
-------------------------------

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS 144). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include
significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a
forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended
period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon
forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the
carrying value of intangible assets would be adjusted, based on estimates of
future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of
the asset. SFAS No. 144 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at
the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Income Taxes
------------

The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 ("SFAS 109"),
which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities, and assets for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities
and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements
and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect
for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary
differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and
income tax purposes are insignificant.

                                      F-9





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Research and Development
------------------------

Company sponsored research and development costs related to both present and
Future products will be expended in the period incurred.

Advertising
-----------

The Company will follow a policy of charging the costs of advertising to
expenses incurred. The Company did not incur any advertising costs during the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Comprehensive Income
--------------------

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 ("SFAS 130"), "Reporting
Comprehensive Income," establishes standards for reporting and displaying of
comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive
income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS
130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current
accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a
financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other
financial statements. The Company does not have any items of comprehensive
income in any of the periods presented.

Segment Information
-------------------

Statement of Financial Standards No.131 " Disclosure about segments of an
enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS 131") establishes standards for
reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented
in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes
standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic
areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about
which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions
how to allocate resources and assess performance. The information disclosed
herein materially represents all of the financial information related to the
Company's principal operating segment.

                                      F-10





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Stock Based Compensation
------------------------

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS 123." This statement
amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide
alternative methods of transition for a voluntary charge to the fair value based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this
statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the
method used on reported results. The Company has chosen to continue to account
for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB
Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense
for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair market value of
the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the exercise price of the
related option. The Company has adopted the annual disclosure provisions of SFAS
No. 148 in its financial reports for the year ended December 31, 2002 and has
adopt the interim disclosure provisions for its financial reports from the
quarter ended March 31, 2003.

Net Loss Per Share
------------------

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS 128"), specifying the computation, presentation and
disclosure requirements of earnings per share information. Basic earnings per
share have been calculated based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Stock options and warrants have been excluded as common
stock equivalents in the diluted earnings per share because they are either
antidilutive, or their effect is not material. There is no effect on earnings
per share information for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 relating to
the adoption of this standard.

Liquidity
---------

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred a net
loss of $6,029 and $34,774 during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Current assets exceed current liabilities by $47,219 as of
December 31, 2003.

Concentration of Credit Risk
----------------------------

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company
to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents
and trade receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash
investments with high credit quality institutions. At times, such investments
may be in excess of applicable insurance limits.

Reclassifications
-----------------

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior year's financial statements to
conform to classifications used in the current year .

                                      F-11





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE A-SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

New Accounting Pronouncements
-----------------------------

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities." Interpretation 46 changes the criteria by which one
company includes another entity in its consolidated financial statements.
Previously, the criteria were based on control through voting interest.
Interpretation 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a
company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the
variable interest entity's activities or entitled to receive a majority of the
entity's residual returns or both. A company that consolidates a variable
interest entity is called the primary beneficiary of that entity. The
consolidation requirements of Interpretation 46 apply immediately to variable
interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements
apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning
after June 15, 2003. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all
financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the
variable interest entity was established. The Company does not expect the
adoption to have a material impact to the Company's financial position or
results of operations.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement No.149, " Amendment of Statement of 133
on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ", which amends Statement 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. The
adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position.

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised), EMPLOYERS' DISCLOSURES
ABOUT PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS - AN AMENDMENT OF FASB
STATEMENTS NO. 87, 88, AND 106. This statement retains the disclosure
requirements contained in FASB statement no. 132, Employers' Disclosures about
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, which it replaces. It requires
additional disclosures to those in the original statement 132 about the assets,
obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The required
information should be provided separately for pension plans and for other
postretirement benefit plans. The revision applies for the first fiscal or
annual interim period ending after December 15, 2003 for domestic pension plans
and June 15, 2004 for foreign pension plans and requires certain new disclosures
related to such plans. The adoption of this statement will not have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations or financial positions.

                                      F-12





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE B - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company's President and principal shareholder has advanced $9,054 and $6,726
to the Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. No formal agreements or
repayment terms exist (see Note G).

NOTE C - NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consists of the following (see Note
G):

                                                        2003             2002
                                                        ----             ----
        Note payable to an entity controlled by an
        individual related to the Company's
        President; Quarterly installments of
        interest only at 10% per annum unsecured and
        guaranteed by a Company officer and
        shareholder. Maturity date is in March 2005.
        Total interest expenses accrued for the
        years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, was
        $6,325 and $3,452, respectively              $  35,000        $  35,000

        Less current portion                            35,000                -
                                                     ----------       ----------
                                                     $       -        $  35,000
                                                     ----------       ----------

NOTE D - CAPITAL STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a
par value of $.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a
par value of $.001 per share (see Note G). On July 5, 1998, the Company issued
2,000,000 shares of its common stock for services rendered. The Company valued
the shares issued at $0.01 per share, which represents the fair value of the
services received which did not differ materially from the value of the stock
issued.

On October 20, 1998, the Company issued 49,000 common shares in a private
placement in exchange for $240 in cash and the forgiveness of $250 of previously
incurred debt. On October 10, 2000, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its
common stock for services rendered. The Company valued the shares issued at
$0.01 per share, which represents the fair value of the services received which
did not differ materially from the value of the stock issued.

                                      F-13





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE E - INCOME TAXES

The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, which requires
the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or
tax returns.

Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
the difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable
income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are
insignificant. At December 31, 2003, the Company has available for federal
income tax purposes a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $69,000,
expiring in the year 2022, that may be used to offset future taxable income. The
Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net
operating loss benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the
earnings history of the Company, it is more likely than not that the benefits
will not be realized. Due to significant changes in the companies ownership, the
Company's future use of its existing net operating losses may be limited.

Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

                                                                         2003
                                                                      ---------
                  Non-current:
                  Net operating loss carry forward                     $ 23,500
                  Valuation allowance                                  $(23,500)
                                                                       ---------
                  Net deferred tax asset                               $      -
                                                                       ---------

NOTE F - LOSSES PER SHARE

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted losses per
share:

                                                   2003               2002
                                                   ----               ----
Loss available for common shareholders          $    (6,029)      $   (34,774)
                                                ============      ============
Basic and fully diluted loss per share          $        --       $     (0.02)
                                                ============      ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding      $ 2,199,000       $ 2,199,000

Net loss per share is based upon the weighted average shares of common stock
outstanding.

                                      F-14





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE G - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 21, 2004 the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued
and outstanding shares of Environmental Technologies, Inc. (Entech) a Nevada
corporation, pursuant to a Capital Stock Exchange agreement. Pursuant to the
transaction, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,550,000 shares of its common
stock to the 12 stockholders of Entech in exchange for 9,550,000 shares of
Entech's common stock, which represented 100 percent of the issued and
outstanding shares of the common stock of Entech. A majority of the shares were
issued to the company's newly elected board of directors, and a relative of one
of the newly elected member of the board of directors. In connection with the
exchange transaction, the Company's stockholders canceled 1,884,000 of their
2,199,000 shares, leaving 315,000 shares issued and outstanding. In addition,
all debts owing by the Company were cancelled by an affiliate of its former
controlling stockholder, Thomas Braun, to facilitate the transaction in exchange
for a total additional consideration of $275,000 paid by Entech to the
stockholders of the Company (see Notes B & C).

                                      F-15





<PAGE>

                           CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE G - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)

On January 27, 2004, the Company completed the private sale of 2,000,000 shares
of its restricted common stock and 7,150,000 warrants for an aggregate
consideration of $2,000,000 to an accredited investor, pursuant to a Stock
Purchase Agreement.

                                      F-16