Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 60109 

3067 (January 19, 2005). The 

complainant named Realtek 

Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu, 

Taiwan, and Real Communications, Inc., 

of San Jose, CA (collectively, ‘‘Realtek’’), 

as respondents. Subsequently, the 

complaint and notice of investigation 

were amended to add an additional 

respondent, BizLink Technology, Inc. 

(‘‘BizLink’’). 

On August 31, 2005, complainant 

Marvell moved to terminate the 

investigation in whole pursuant to 19 

U.S.C. 1337(c) and 19 CFR 210.21 based 

on a settlement agreement. On 

September 12, 2005, respondents 

Realtek and BizLink filed a response to 

the motion. Respondents do not oppose 

the motion to terminate. On the same 

day, the Commission investigative 

attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in 

support of the motion. On September 

16, 2005, Marvell filed a reply to 

respondents’ and the IA’s responses. 

On September 19, 2005, the ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 21) granting 

complainant’s motion. No party 

petitioned for review of the ALJ’s ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

§ 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 7, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20571 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–636–638 

(Second Review)] 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, 

France, and India 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on stainless steel wire rod 

from Brazil, France, and India. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on stainless steel wire rod from 

Brazil, France, and India would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule 

for the reviews will be established and 

announced at a later date. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2005, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to 

full reviews in the subject five-year 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (70 

FR 38207, July 1, 2005) was adequate, 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response with respect to France 

was adequate, but found that the 

respondent interested party group 

responses with respect to Brazil and 

India were inadequate. However, the 

Commission determined to conduct full 

reviews concerning subject imports 

from Brazil and India to promote 

administrative efficiency in light of its 

decision to conduct a full review with 

respect to subject imports from France. 

A record of the Commissioners’ votes, 

the Commission’s statement on 

adequacy, and any individual 

Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the 

Secretary and at the Commission’s Web 

site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20620 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–510; Enforcement 

Proceeding] 

In the Matter of Systems for Detecting 

and Removing Viruses or Worms, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of Institution 

of Formal Enforcement Proceeding 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has instituted a formal 

enforcement proceeding relating to a 

cease and desist order issued at the 

conclusion of the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of 

the General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3152. Copies of the public version 

of all nonconfidential documents filed 

in connection with this investigation are 

or will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–2000. Hearing-impaired persons are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

patent-based section 337 investigation 

was instituted by the Commission on 

June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed 

by Trend Micro Inc. (‘‘Trend Micro’’) of 

Cupertino, California. 69 FR 32044–

32045 (June 8, 2004). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation into the United 

States, or the sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

systems for detecting and removing 

viruses or worms, components thereof, 

60110 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 

and products containing same by reason 

of infringement of claims 1–22 of the 

‘600 patent. The notice of investigation 

named Fortinet, Inc. (‘‘Fortinet’’) of 

Sunnyvale, California as the sole 

respondent. 

On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding a violation of section 

337 based on his findings that claims 4, 

7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent are 

not invalid or unenforceable, and are 

infringed by respondent’s products. The 

ALJ also found that claims 1 and 3 of 

the ‘600 patent are invalid as 

anticipated by prior art and that a 

domestic industry exists. He also issued 

his recommended determination on 

remedy and bonding. 

On July 8, 2005, the Commission 

issued a notice that it had determined 

not to review the ALJ’s final ID on 

violation, thereby finding a violation of 

Section 337. 70 FR 40731 (July 14, 

2005). The Commission also requested 

briefing on the issues of remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. Id. 

Submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding were 

filed on July 18, 2005, by all parties. All 

parties filed response submissions on 

July 25, 2005. On August 8, 2005, the 

Commission terminated the 

investigation, and issued a limited 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order covering respondent’s systems for 

detecting and removing viruses or 

worms, components thereof, and 

products containing same covered by 

claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 

patent. 

On September 13, 2005, complainant 

Trend Micro Inc. filed a complaint for 

enforcement proceedings of the 

Commission’s remedial orders. Trend 

Micro asserts that respondent Fortinet, 

and its distributors, have circumvented 

the cease and desist order by continuing 

to advertise, market, sell and offer for 

sale in the United States the imported 

infringing products and antivirus 

features of Fortinet’s infringing 

software. 

The Commission, having examined 

the complaint seeking a formal 

enforcement proceeding, and having 

found that the complaint complies with 

the requirements for institution of a 

formal enforcement proceeding 

contained in Commission rule 210.75, 

has determined to institute formal 

enforcement proceedings to determine 

whether Fortinet is in violation of the 

Commission’s cease and desist order 

issued in the investigation, and what if 

any enforcement measures are 

appropriate. The following entities are 

named as parties to the formal 

enforcement proceeding: (1) 

Complainant Trend Micro, (2) 

respondent Fortinet, and (3) a 

Commission investigative attorney to be 

designated by the Director, Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

§ 210.75 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.75). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 7, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20572 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Review)] 

Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet 

from Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct a full five-year 

review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on tin- and chromium-coated 

steel sheet from Japan. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on tin- and chromium-coated steel 

sheet from Japan would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the review will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2005, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to a 

full review in the subject five-year 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that 

both the domestic and respondent 

interested party group responses to its 

notice of institution (70 FR 38210, July 

1, 2005) were adequate. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–20622 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

October 7, 2005. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following public 

information collection request (ICR) to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–

13,44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this 

ICR, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained by 

calling the Department of Labor. To 

obtain documentation contact Ira Mills 

on 202–693–4122 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or e-mail: Mills.Ira@dol.gov. 

Comments should be sent to Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office 

of Management and Budget, Room 

10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202–

395–7316 (this is not a toll free number), 

within 30 days from the date of this 

publication in the Federal Register. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary