alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

             CERTIFICATION OF JOHN ASTON PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge Antibody
Technology Group plc (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John Aston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

                                                          Date: October 14, 2003

                                              /s/ John Aston
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  John Aston
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Carbon Graphite Group. Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenfang Yang, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 15, 2010





/s/Zhenfang Yang


Zhenfang Yang


Interim Chief Financial Officer
Jerry Wayne ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. Ronald Newton LOCKE and Carolina Surgery & Cancer Center, PLLC, Defendants.

No. COA18-86

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      115242 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              7313014 
<ALLOWANCES>                               1724826 
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           5927645 
<PP&E>                                    15607366 
<DEPRECIATION>                             1455579 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            24713696 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     29094769 
<BONDS>                                    2192374 
<COMMON>                                     15949 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     17 
<OTHER-SE>                                (6589413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              24713696 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              9805572 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          14455963 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           1946140 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (4590621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.33)
        

</TABLE>
Elizabeth E. LETENDRE v. CURRITUCK COUNTY, North Carolina

No. 178P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Donald I. McRee, Jr., Currituck County Attorney, G. Nicholas Herman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Currituck County (North Carolina).

Jonathan E. Hall, Attorney at Law, Michael Joseph Crook, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Gregory E. Wills, Attorney at Law, Point Harbor, Jamie S. Schwedler, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for LeTendre, Elizabeth E

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 18th of June 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 18th of June 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

I, Robert H. Lorsch, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MMR Information Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (ii) the information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MMR
Information Systems, Inc.

|/s/ Robert H. Lorsch
|--------------------
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that section.
This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
First National Bancshares, Inc.
Bradenton, Florida

We consent to the use of our report dated January 18, 2002 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 of First
National Bancshares, Inc., in the Annual Report for 2001 on Form 10-K of First
National Bancshares, Inc.



| | CHRISTOPHER, SMITH, LEONARD,
     BRISTOW, STANELL & WELLS, P.A.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

February 28, 2002
IN RE: Foreclosure Regarding Margareta BLACKWELL-Old Stone Crossing at Caldwell Creek.

No. COA17-806

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*





*Mark
        L. Kay*
 *Chief
        Executive Officer*
  *May
        23, 2006*
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NOS.  2-06-274-CR

						 2-06-275-CR                                               		

MICHAEL W. MCDOWELL	          					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “ Withdrawal Of Notice Of Appeal And The Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 						 														

										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 26, 2006
NUMBER 13-16-00131-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GEORGE & PATRICIA LOPEZ, BRUCE & 

MARY ZIMMERMAN & CAROL A. HENKE, Appellants,

v.

RONALD BRANDOW INDIVIDUALLY & IN 

HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY & COTTONWOOD 

CREEK PROPERTY OWNERS, INC., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 445th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, George & Patricia Lopez, Bruce & Mary Zimmerman & Carol A. Henke, 

perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 445th District Court of Cameron 

County, Texas, in cause number 2014-DCL-8566-I. Appellants have filed an amended 
2

agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the parties have settled all issues 

between them in this cause. Appellants request this appeal be dismissed with prejudice 

against the refiling of same. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to 

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing 

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed 

the 9th day of June, 2016.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7163

DONALD ADDISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. T. ELMORE, Classification; SERGEANT GERAGHTY, Classification; DAVID P. CURRO, Parole Officer, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-443-A) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Addison, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM:Donald Addison seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Addison’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appealperiod under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 18, 2001. Addison’s notice of appeal was filed on July 16, 2001. * Because Addison failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,313
<INVENTORY>                                     42,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,665
<PP&E>                                          65,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,046
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,524
<OTHER-SE>                                   (372,710)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,541
<SALES>                                        503,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,344
<CGS>                                          240,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  397,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,795)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,588
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





ROMACORP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard A. Peabody, the undersigned Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Romacorp, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 30, 2003 (the "Report") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:

|1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                               
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   |                                                                                                                                                          



/s/ Richard A. Peabody
Richard A. Peabody
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2003
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Public Accountants**

 

The Board of Directors 

Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-82059, 333-40736, and 333-33088) on Form S-8 and the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-66616 and 333-42216) on Form S-3 of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule,which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

March 26, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, T. V. Mohandas Pai, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Infosys Technologies Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Technologies Limited. 

Date: April 28, 2006

    /s/ T.V. MOHANDAS PAI 

  T.V. Mohandas Pai   Chief Financial Officer
EX-32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Small Business Company., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, David Larson, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                May 13, 2008
            /s/
                David LarsonDavid
                Larson, President, Chief Executive Officer,and
                Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7237

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO JAVIER GARCIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-87-313, CA-97-1117-1-6)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benson Barry Weintraub, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. Alfred

William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Garcia, Nos. CR-87-313; CA-97-1117-1-6

(D.S.C. Jul. 10. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED