alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jack Wagenti, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Precious Metals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 21, 2005
/s/ Jack Wagenti
Jack Wagenti
Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Jimmy Lee FORTE, Jr.

No. 223PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Forte, Jimmy Lee (Jr.)

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of August 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

# Name:

President's Committee on the National Medal of Science (1182).

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m.

# Place:

Room 555-II, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA.

# Type of Meeting:

Closed.

# Contact Person:

Ms. Ann Noonan, Honorary Awards Specialist, Room 1220, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-8096.

# Purpose of Meeting:

To provide advice and recommendations to the President in the selection of the 2005 National Medal of Science recipients.

# Agenda:

To review and evaluate nominations as part of the selection process for awards.

# Reason for Closing:

The nominations being reviewed include information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

Dated: October 11, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20648  Filed 10-11-05; 3:47 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4938 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4938

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
 To permit the use of previously appropriated funds to extend the Small 
        Business Loan Guarantee Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SMALL BUSINESS LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM.
    (a) Authority to Use Funds.--Up to $40,000,000 of the amount made 
available under the heading ``Small Business Administration--Business 
Loans Program Account'' in title V of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-117) also may be utilized for 
fee reductions and eliminations under section 501 of title V of 
division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5) and for the cost of guaranteed loans under section 
502 of such title. Such costs, including the cost of modifying such 
loans, shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget 
Act of 1974.
    (b) Extension of Sunset Date.--Section 502(f) of title V of 
division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5) is amended by striking ``March 28, 2010'' and 
inserting ``April 30, 2010''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Opinion filed October 16 , 2014



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ ___ ______ No s . 11

- 1 4

- 00 258

- CR , 11

- 14

- 00 259

- CR, & 11

- 1 4

- 00 260

- CR

_____ ___ _____ MAR CUS DWIGHT BOOTH , Appellant
V.
THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 3 8 5 th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . CR 42435 , CR4 2436 , & CR 4 2437

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Marcus Dwight Booth
, Appellant, filed a n untimely pro se notice of appeal
from a conviction for possession of cocaine and two convictions for assault on a public servant. We dismiss the appeal s

. The documents on file in these cases indicate that Appellant’s sentence s

w ere imposed on July 14 , 201 4 , and that his pro se notice of app eal was filed in the
district clerk’s office on September 22 , 201 4 . When the appeal s w ere filed in this2 court, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal s may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. We also noted that the trial court’s certifications of Appellant’s right of appeal indicated that Appellant has no right of appeal because these were plea

- bargain cases and because Appellant waived his right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)( 2), (d). We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue

. Appellant has responded but has not shown grounds to continue these appeals

. P ursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2 , a notice of appeal is due to be filed either (1) wit hin thirty days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court or (2) if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and
filed wi th the clerk of the trial court. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents
on file in this court re flect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk
of the trial court seventy d ays after his sentence s w ere imposed and that no motion
for ne w trial was filed

. The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain these appeal s

. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal s

. Th ese appeal s are dismissed for want o f jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
October 16 , 2014 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson
, J., and Bailey, J.
#### Ex parte Michael Ray BAIRD. (In re Michael Ray Baird v. State of Alabama.)

1012192.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 1, 2002.

Mari Morrison, Birmingham, for petitioner.

LYONS, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. *Horsley v. Horsley,*291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

MOORE, C.J., concurs in the result.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement for the Oklahoma 
Launch Site Operator License for the Clinton-Sherman Industrial Airpark 
(CSIA)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation.
SUMMARY: On October 23, 2002, the FAA published a Notice of Intent to 
prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Oklahoma Space 
Industry Development Authority's (OSIDA's) proposal to operate a 
commercial launch site at the Clinton-Sherman Industrial Airpark (CSIA) 
in the Federal Register (67 FR 65169). The original proposed action 
included horizontal and vertical launches, significant construction 
activities, orbital launches, and vehicle manufacturing. The nature of 
these activities necessitated that the proposed action be addressed 
through the preparation of an EIS.
    Subsequent changes to the proposed action have eliminated the need 
for vertical launch, construction of any kind, orbital launches, and 
vehicle manufacturing. The proposed action as currently stated involves 
the horizontal launch of suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicles from an 
existing runway at the CSIA. The horizontal launch activities are 
similar to the current Air Force activities at the CSIA and are not 
expected to produce significant impacts, indicating that an EA would be 
the most appropriate NEPA analysis for OSIDA's proposed activities.
    Scoping meetings were held in Oklahoma in November 2002. Because 
the proposed action is a subset of the information originally presented 
during scoping, we do not propose to re-initiate scoping meetings. For 
the reasons stated above, the FAA is canceling the EIS and will prepare 
an Environmental Assessment to analyze the impacts of the proposed 
action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions may be directed to Doug 
Graham, FAA Environmental Specialist, c/o ICF Consulting, 9300 Lee 
Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031 or (202) 267-8568.

    Date Issued: September 30, 2005.
Herbert Bachner,
Manager, Space Systems Development Division.
[FR Doc. 05-20180 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               6195262.34      16374432.33                0       179286467.68
APO                       0         25366.41                0          556028.62
AR                     0.54              100                0                  0
B1                 41941.98         25273.49                0         1275726.51
B2                 22599.02         13617.78                0          687382.23
B3                 16151.36          9732.54                0          491267.47
B4                 29046.68         17503.02                0          883496.99
B5                  9671.49          5827.86                0          294172.14
B6                  9711.47          4850.84          1001.11          295388.46


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of ISP Chemco Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sunil Kumar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Salvatore J. Guccione, as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief:



|/s/SUNIL KUMAR           |  |                                                   |  | 
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Name:                    |  | Sunil Kumar                                       |  | 
|Title:                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer             |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005     |  |                                                   |  | 
|/s/SALVATORE J. GUCCIONE |  |                                                   |  | 
|Name:                    |  | Salvatore J. Guccione                             |  | 
|Title:                   |  | Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005     |  |                                                   |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
#### David R. CARTER, Sr., Appellant, v. Roberta CARTER, as guardian of the property of David Carter, Jr. and Cayla Nicole Carter; and Enterprise Leasing Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D03-2061.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 21, 2003.

Terence J. Kann, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Dennis P. Dore of Dore, Lanier, Noey *&*Fannin, Jacksonville, for Appellee Enterprise Leasing Company.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant brought this appeal seeking review of an order that granted a motion for summary judgment. However, because the order on appeal did not enter judgment, the order is not final and this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review it. *Cf. McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,*789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). *See generally Benton v. Moore,*655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). As the appellant concedes that the instant order is not ap-pealable, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
#### Anthony J. COVEY; Caren F. Covey; Anthony Pegnatori; Karen Pegnatori, Robert J. Linn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOLLYDALE MOBILEHOME ESTATES; Hub City Construction, Inc., a California corporation; Elizabeth Scott; W.H. Stauder; The C. Paul Scott and Louise Mary Scott Trust Dated November 2, 1970, individually and d/b/a Hub City Construction Co. and d/b/a Hollydale Mobilehome Estates; Paul J. Scott; Jean Ann Crilley; Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-55056.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 1997.

Before: FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and WEXLER,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Leonard D. Wexler, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Prior report: 116 F.3d 830.

The opinion filed June 18, 1997, Slip op. 7065 is amended as follows:

At page 7080 [116 F.3d at 836, left column, first full paragraph], second full paragraph should read:

> Moreover, by retroactively changing the standard for determining whether the Park, in 1993, provided “significant facilities and services specifically designed to meet the physical or social needs of older persons,” 42 U.S.C. § 3607(b)(2)(C)(i), applying the 1995 regulations would “impair rights [Covey] possessed when [Hollydale] acted.” *Landgraf,*511 U.S. at 279, 114 S.Ct. at 1505.8

With this amendment, the panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Fletcher and Pregerson have voted to reject the sugges*1282tion for rehearing en banc and Judge Wexler recommends rejection.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPILHOLDING (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Louis Bertoli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| */s/ Louis Bertoli*     |
|-------------------------|
| Louis Bertoli           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| May 20, 2013            |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.
#### Russell GREENE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D03-1259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 27, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 2003.

Steven G. Mason of the Law Offices of Steven G. Mason, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy D. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We elect to treat the petition for writ of mandamus as an appeal of the trial court’s orders denying Petitioner’s request to compel the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Orange County to produce certain records.1 Having thoroughly reviewed the matter, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

1

. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).
Exhibit 23



                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northern Star Financial, Inc.
Mankato, MN  56001

We consent to the use of our report dated August 5, 1999, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition Northern Star Financial, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of June 30, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements
of operation, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended June 30,
1999 and for the period from inception, January 22, 1998 to June 30, 1998 which
report appears in the June 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern
Star Financial, Inc.



/s/ Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP

Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP
Waseca, Minnesota
October 6, 1999