alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
David G. Hanna, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CompuCredit Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
March 8, 2005

| |  | /s/DAVID G. HANNADavid G. Hanna Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4922 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a section of that Act 

relating to exportation or importation of natural gas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. KENNEDY, 

and Mr. LANGEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a section 

of that Act relating to exportation or importation of 

natural gas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPORTATION OR IMPORTATION OF NATURAL 

4 GAS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 311 of the Energy Policy 

6 Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 685) is re7 pealed. 

8 (b) APPLICATION.—The Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 717 et seq.) shall be applied and administered as if section 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4922 IH

1 311 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (and the amend2 ments made by the section) had not been enacted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
fs32013ex4xvi_magnegas.htm


Exhibit 4.16










 



	[__]     	 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 	[_________]





 


                                                                                                                                                                                         


 


 


MAGNEGAS CORPORATION


 


 


AUTHORIZED: 900,000,000 COMMON SHARES


$0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE












 


 


                                                          INSERT NAME OF SHAREHOLDER


 


 


INSERT AMOUNT OF SHARES (__________________________)


 


 







May 16, 2013


 


 



	 	 	 
	Luisa Ingargiola, Chief Financial Officer	 	Ermanno Santilli, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D.Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D.Chief Financial Officer
(in an interim capacity)
#### Myra Simone BELLANGER v. Gregory Paul FORTMAYER.

No. 2003-CC-1867.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 15, 2003.

In re Bellanger, Myra Simone; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 386-531; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-591.

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136203 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n ACEMCO, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

v SC: 136203 COA: 272491 Muskegon CC: 04-043203-CK

RYERSON TULL COIL PROCESSING, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The parties’ Supply Agreement unambiguously provides a quan tity term by stating that the total purchase volume “will be . . . 33,950,000 pounds . . . plus or minus 20%.” We REMAND this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for reinsta tement of the July 31, 2006 order denying the defendant ’s motion for summary disposition and for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

K ELLY , J. ( concurring in part and dissenting in part ).

I agree with the decision to reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to the trial court.

Paragraph one of the partie s’ supply agreemen t provides that “Buyer agrees to buy from Seller such quantities of [steel products ] as the Buyer may sp ecify in its purchase orders, the estimated volume of which will be a total of 33,950,000 po unds for all of the products, plus or minus 20%, over the term of the Agreement.” Th is language could be interpreted to mean th at the plaintiff is not entitled to buy any steel products whatsoever from the defendant. But it is e qually possible to inte rpret this clause to mean that the plaintiff had an obligation to purchase at least 27,170,000 (33,050,000 minus 20 percent) pounds of steel products over the course of the contract. He nce, the contract language is ambiguous._______________________________________ __ 2

Once a quantity term appears in a writing that is claime d to represent a contract for the sale of goods, parol evidence may be considered to resolve ambiguities. In re Frost Estate , 130 Mich App 556, 559 (1983). It is th e jury that must deci de what quantity, if any, the supply agreement sp ecified in this case. Great Northern Packaging, Inc v General Tire & Rubber Co , 154 Mich App 777, 787 (1987 ). For that reason, the case should be remanded to the Mu skegon Circuit Court for reinstatement of the July 31, 2006, order denying th e defendant’s motion fo r summary disposition.

s0923 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2008

Clerk
In the MATTER OF Daniel Edward JOHNSON, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001711

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 24, 2018

**558ORDER

Respondent was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury on twenty-six counts of wire fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy, and theft of federal funds. In addition, respondent was indicted by **559a State Grand Jury on three counts of misconduct in office and embezzlement of public funds. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). Respondent acknowledges his federal and state indictments and consents to an interim suspension.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*, C. J.

FOR THE COURT
STATE of North Carolina v. Mark Leon CONNER

No. 345P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Joseph P. Lattimore, Attorney at Law, for Conner, Mark Leon.

Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of October 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project 
Proposal/Possible Action, (5) Web site Update, (6) General Discussion, 
(7) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 24, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. and 
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their 
names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., 
Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0463636560606d6a6d4462772a6261602a7177"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9b9b9d9898959295bc9a8fd29a9998d2898f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by October 21, 2005 will have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Arthur Quintana,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-20486 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 34310-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 13.1 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PETER CHAMBRÉ PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc (the “Company”) for the period ending September30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Chambré, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atthe dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Date: September 19,2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10205 and # 10206] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 3. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 09/24/2005. 

Incident: Hurricane Rita. 

Incident Period: 09/23/2005 and continuing. 

Effective Date: 09/29/2005. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2005. 

EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006. 

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

Primary Parishes: Ascension, Saint Martin, Vernon, West Baton Rouge. 

Contiguous Parishes: Louisiana: East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Livingston, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Sabine, West Feliciana. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator, for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-20640 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dwayne Yaretz, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.



|                     |                                                                                     | 
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: March 12, 2013 | /s/ Dwayne Yaretz                                                                   | 
|                     | Dwayne Yaretz
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) | 







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2448

OSCAR ANOTNIO MARTINEZ-GARCIA; FRANCISCO 

MARTINEZ-GARCIA,

 Petitioners,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 17-1675

OSCAR ANOTNIO MARTINEZ-GARCIA; FRANCISCO 

MARTINEZ-GARCIA,

 Petitioners,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: December 22, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2018
2

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Denied in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evelyn R.G. Smallwood, HATCH ROCKERS IMMIGRATION, Durham, North 

Carolina, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Keith I. 

McManus, Assistant Director, Juria L. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Oscar A. Martinez-Garcia and Francisco Martinez-Garcia, brothers and natives 

and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of orders of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying 

their requests for asylum and withholding of removal,* and denying their motion to 

reconsider. 

With respect to the Board’s order dismissing the appeal, we have thoroughly 

reviewed the record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting 

evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any 

of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Martinez-Garcia (B.I.A. Dec. 12, 2016). As no arguments have been raised on 

appeal with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider, we dismiss the petition for 

review in part as to that order. See In re Martinez-Garcia (B.I.A. May 8, 2017); 

Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (absent a miscarriage 

of justice, arguments not raised in opening brief are waived).

Accordingly, we deny in part, and dismiss in part, the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

 * On appeal, petitioners do not challenge the agency’s denial of protection under 

the Convention Against Torture.
4

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DENIED IN PART; 

DISMISSED IN PART
|     (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            |                                                                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:   | /s/ Scott              Miller                                                                 |
|            | Scott                MillerChief                Executive Officer February                14, 2007 |
|            |                                                                                               |
|            | /s/ Faith Forbis                                                                                   |
|            | Faith                ForbisChief                Financial OfficerFebruary                14, 2007  |
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





--------------------------------------------------------------------








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
May 15, 2008








/s/ Mark L. Kay


Mark L.
Kay


Chief
Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stallion Group
  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2005,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  Periodic Report), I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief Executive Officer
  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January
  25, 2006

/s/ Gerald W. Williams

Gerald W. Williams Chief Executive Officer

---