alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4863 

To increase the annual amount authorized for emergency assistance under 

the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Mr. SESTAK (for himself and Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To increase the annual amount authorized for emergency 

assistance under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE. 

4 Section 2602(e) of the Low-Income Home Energy 

5 Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8621(e)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘$600,000,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$750,000,000’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4910 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4910

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and enact the 
    Empowering Patients First Act in order to provide incentives to 
                  encourage health insurance coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2010

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Natural Resources, Education and Labor, Ways and Means, 
the Judiciary, Rules, the Budget, Appropriations, House Administration, 
 and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and enact the 
    Empowering Patients First Act in order to provide incentives to 
                  encourage health insurance coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act, such Act is repealed, and the provisions of law 
amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act 
had not been enacted.

SEC. 2. ENACTMENT OF EMPOWERING PATIENTS FIRST ACT.

    The bill H.R. 3400 (111th Congress), as introduced in the House of 
Representatives on July 30, 2009, is hereby enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Private Media Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Berth Milton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan
Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Berth Milton       
|Berth Milton           
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|April 15, 2009         
|                       
|/s/ Johan Gillborg     
|Johan Gillborg         
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|April 15, 2009         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 October 27, 2006
    
    /s/ Curtis J. Larrimer

Curtis J. LarrimerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 19.13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AngloGold Ashanti Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending 31 December 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                   |  | 
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: 31 March 2016 |  | /s/ Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan    |  | 
|                    |  | Name: Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan  |  | 
|                    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer    |  | 
|                    |  |                                  
|Date: 31 March 2016 |  | /s/ Kandimathie Christine Ramon   |  | 
|                    |  | Name: Kandimathie Christine Ramon |  | 
|                    |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer    |  | 



E-8
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00600-CR

Fernando Gomez Valdez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1288-18-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 27, 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1326

LISA EVETTE HARRELL SHELLMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:14-cv-00382-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: August 18, 2015 Decided: August 28, 2015

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Evette Harrell Shellman, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Patrick 

Shean, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Evette Shellman appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely this action challenging the 

Commissioner’s decision denying Shellman’s applications for 

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Shellman v. Social Sec. Admin., No. 2:14-cv-00382-MSDLRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Michael D. Lohner, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Home Interiors &Gifts, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andhave:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation;  c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting,to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 22, 2004                                                       /s/MICHAEL D. LOHNER   Michael D. Lohner   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
STATE of North Carolina v. William E. MORGANHERRING IV

No. 340A95-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 2, 2018

William Morganherring, for Morganherring, William.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 28th of September 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of October 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of September 2018 by Defendant for DNA Testing of Biological Specimens:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of October 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App), this notice announces a meeting of the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG). The TAMWG affords stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical input concerning Trinity River restoration efforts to the Trinity Management Council. Primary objectives of the meeting will include: History of restoration efforts on the Trinity River; Introduction to the Trinity River Restoration Program (TRRP); TAMWG priorities, procedures, organization, operations and interaction with other TRRP entities; and status of wildlife in TRRP policy and budget. Completion of the agenda is dependent on the amount of time each item takes. The meeting could end early if the agenda has been completed. The meeting is open to the public. 

# DATES:

The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group will meet from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Friday, November 4, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Weaverville Victorian Inn, 1709 Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093. Telephone: (530) 623-4432. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mike Long of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, California 95521, (707) 822-7201. Mike Long is the working group's Designated Federal Official. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

For background information and questions regarding the Trinity River Restoration Program, please contact Douglas Schleusner, Executive Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. Box 1300, 1313 South Main Street, Weaverville, California 96093, (530) 623-1800. 

      ( print page 59770)    
Dated: October 6, 2005. 

John Engbring, 

Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento, CA. 

[FR Doc. 05-20492 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Argued and submitted March 31,

vacated in part; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed May 15, 2003

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DANIEL GLEN BIGELOW, *Appellant.*

99CR0632; A106783

69 P3d 786

Shawn Wiley, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

Holly A. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*716PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to theft by receiving. ORS 164.055(l)(c). We reject most of his arguments without discussion. The state concedes that the trial court erred by imposing restitution for items that defendant returned to the victim, and we agree.

Order of restitution vacated; remanded for resent-encing; otherwise affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gordon Wine, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 620]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, *926filed January 20, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, who was hired in September 1998 as a math teacher in a religious school, was discharged in January 1999 based upon several incidents of physical contact with students. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. We affirm. The testimony of the school’s principal regarding petitioner’s inability to control his classroom and the testimony of two students regarding claimant’s use of physical force provide substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision *(see, Matter of Dworkis [Sweeney],*235 AD2d 896). The absence of contemporaneous written documentation regarding the incidents and petitioner’s testimony, to the extent that it contradicted that of the other witnesses, created a question of credibility for resolution by the Board *(see, id.).*

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00962

- CV

BOSHENG WEN , Appellant

V.

STEWART LIN , Appellee

Appeal from the 234th District of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- 28916 ).

TO THE 234TH DISTRICT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 23rd day of December 2014 , the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on October 7, 2013. After submitting the case

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment

contai ns no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Bosheng Wen, pay

all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered Dec ember 23 , 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Massengale.

Opinion delivered by Justice Sharp.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

June 26, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT