alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-272 AND 50-311]


PSEG Nuclear, LLC, EXELON Generation Company, LLC, Salem Nuclear 
Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Applicaton for Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has 
granted the request of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG), on behalf of PSEG and 
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensees), to withdraw its April 
15, 2004, application for proposed amendments to Facility Operating 
License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 for the Salem Nuclear Generating 
Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, located in Salem County, New 
Jersey.
    The proposed change to the fire protection program would have 
decreased the carbon dioxide concentration, hold time, and number of 
discharges for the fire suppression systems in the 4160-volt switchgear 
rooms, 460-volt switchgear rooms, and lower electrical penetration area 
rooms. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration 
of Issuance of Amendments published in the Federal Register November 
23, 2004 (69 FR 68184). However, by letter dated September 26, 2005, 
PSEG withdrew the above-referenced proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendments dated April 15, 2004, and the request for 
withdrawal dated September 26, 2005. Documents may be examined, and/or 
copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at 
One White Flint North, Public File Area 01 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike 
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly-available records will be 
accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and 
Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the 
internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html. 
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in 
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR 
reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or (301) 415-4737, or 
by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adddc9dfedc3dfce83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1819583b19f8392df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of September 2005.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stewart N. Bailey, Sr.
Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 05-19922 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
exh10-11.htm














Exhibit 10.11


 


Convertible Promissory Note Rider Agreement







THIS RIDER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made effective as of the 6th day of February, 20 I 3, between Magna Group, LLC, (the "Investor") and China Direct Investments, Inc. (the "Debtholder");







WHEREAS, the Investor and Debtholder (the "parties") entered into an "Assignment Agreement", dated February 6th, 2013, in the amount of $50,952.50;







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties hereto agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Right of First Refusal:













	
  

	
a.

	
The Investor will have a "Right of First Refusal" on the purchase of the following Promissory Notes owed to the Debtholder as long as the Agreement is still in place. Should the Investor not purchase the Debt on or before the scheduled Purchase date, the Investor will not have this right and the entire Agreement will be immediately terminated.







 


    The Right of First Refusal will works as follows: Should the Debtholder contemplate the sale of any of the Notes listed in the schedule below, the Investor will have a 72 hour Right of First Refusal to purchase said Notes. 


 


    The Debtholder will provide the Investor with a term sheet outlining the general terms under which it may sell these Notes. Upon receipt, the Investor will have 72 hours to match the offer.   







Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $40,000.00


7/23/2010                          China Logistics Group, Inc.


Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $30,000.00


8/1/2010                            China Logistics Group, Inc.


Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $3,500.00


8/25/2010                          China Logistics Group, Inc.


Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $32,000.00


9/28/2010                          China Logistics Group, Inc.


Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $20,000.00


1/13/2011                          China Logistics Group, Inc.


Issuance Date:                                Issuing Company:                                $22,500.00


2/16/2011                          China Logistics Group, Inc.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.







Investor:







Magna Group LLC







/s/ Joshua Sason, CEO












Company:


China Direct Investments, Inc.







/s/ James Wang, CEO & Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20550]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5204]


Notice of Meeting; United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee Information Meeting on the World Summit on the 
Information Society

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC). The purpose 
of the Committee is to advise the Department on matters related to 
telecommunication and information policy matters in preparation for 
international meetings pertaining to telecommunication and information 
issues.
    The ITAC will meet to discuss the matters related to the second 
phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), in 
preparation for the WSIS Summit in mid-November. The meeting will take 
place on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. in the 
auditorium of the Historic National Academy of Science Building. The 
National Academy of Sciences is located at 2100 C St. NW., Washington, 
DC.
    Members of the public are welcome to participate and may join in 
the discussions, subject to the discretion of the Chair. Persons 
planning to attend this meeting should send the following data by fax 
to (202) 647-5957 or e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed878481819e82838c89ad9e998c9988c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afc5c6c3c3dcc0c1cecbefdcdbcedbca81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a> not later than 24 
hours before the meeting: (1) Name of the meeting, (2) your name, and 
(3) organizational affiliation. A valid photo ID must be presented to 
gain entrance to the National Academy of Sciences Building. Directions 
to the meeting location may be obtained by calling the ITAC Secretariat 
at (202) 647-5205.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Anne Jillson,
Foreign Affairs Officer, International Communications and Information 
Policy, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-20550 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Docket 147/357

#### Federal Insurance Company, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, complainant, *v.*Margaret E. Engelhorn, defendant.

[Decided January 24th, 1947.]

*Messrs. Sanderson, Engel & Leonard,*for the complainant.

*Mr. Francis P. Meehan,*for the defendant.

Kays, Y. C.

This matter comes before me on a motion to strike out the answer of the defendant.

The bill of complaint is based on the equitable theory of subrogation. Complainant seeks to impress a trust on $1,500 received by the defendant from L. Bamberger &■ Co. Complainant contends that the receipt of this money was in direct contravention of complainant’s right to subrogation.

The bill of complaint- alleges that the defendant insured her mink coat with the complainant for $1,800 and after-wards stored it with L. Bamberger & Co. The coat dis*251appeared from the storage plant of L. Bamberger & Co. The bill further alleges that the defendant, upon learning of hex-loss, filed a proof of claim with complainant for the full amount of the policy; to wit, $1,800, and received the said amount. After the payment by complainant of the' said $1,800, defendant received from L. Bamberger & Co. $1,500 which was the value placed on said coat at the time defendant stored it with said company. The bill further states that complainant has several times demanded of the defendant the amount of money; to wit, $1,500 which she received from' L. Bamberger & Co.

The answer admits that the complainant insured her coat and paid her the claim of $1,800. She alleges, however, that the value of the coat was $3,500 and that the amount paid by complainant, together with the $1,500 paid by L. Bamberger & Co., was not sufficient to indemnify her for her loss and that, therefore, complainaixt is not entitled to be subrogated to any part of the moneys paid to her by L. Bamberger & Co.

Complainant moves to strike out the answer of the defendant on the following grounds: That it is sham; that it is frivolous; that it is insufficient; and, that it fails to disclose any defense in equity.

The bill and answer, together with the affidavits, present a question of fact relative to the value of the coat. The question of value can only be determined on final hearing.

The law of this state is that “the insured can be called upon to account to the insurer-subrogee, only if he has recovered more from the insurer and the wrongdoer than the total of his loss, and then only for the excess. The excess he holds in trust for the insurer.” *Camden Fire Insurance Association*v. Prezioso, *93 N. J. Eq.*318, *320.*

The motion to strike out the answer is, therefore, denied.
Exhibit 23.01



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

ECB Bancorp, Inc. and
Subsidiary



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-77689 and 333-151210) on Forms S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-157574) on Form S-3 of ECB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary of our reports dated March 11, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
ECB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in ECB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiarys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC     
|                          
|Greenville, North Carolina
|March 11, 2009
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      13, 2009                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |
| /s/ Michael P. Kurtanjek                                           |
|                                                               |
| Michael      P. Kurtanjek, President & Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)                                 |

----
In the MATTER OF: B.O.A.

No. 264PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Edward Eldred, Attorney at Law, for Barber, Lauren Erica

Holly Williamson Batten, N. Kyle Hicks, Oxford, C. Gill Frazier, II, Attorneys at Law, for Granville County DSS

Derek Martin Bast, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for B.O.A.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 21st of August 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of August 2018 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MortgageIT Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Doug W. Naidus, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    |      /s/ DOUG W. NAIDUS |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Doug W. Naidus                                   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                          |
|   |   | September 13, 2004                          |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
----

(2004/C 84 E/0880)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0397/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 February 2004)

Subject:   Legalising irregular migrants working in the Union

Several million irregular immigrants work in the EU, and to date, the European Institutions have not taken any decisions comparable to those of the President of the USA, who has just forwarded to Congress a proposal for a new policy to give millions of irregular workers legal status. Although the implementation of this decision by the US President may in some respects be open to criticism, there is no doubt that it marks a major step forward in resolving an extremely serious economic and humanitarian problem. Has the Commission planned any similar political initiative to legalise the presence of irregular immigrants in the Union? If so, what type of initiative would it be?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(6 April 2004)

In order to implement the Treaty of Amsterdam and the mandate given in Tampere, the Commission has tabled several proposals for directives concerning the admission and the conditions of stay of third-country nationals.

Until now, none of these proposals contained provisions on the regularisation of the legal status of illegal immigrants already within the territory of the European Union and no such proposal is envisaged in the near future.

The Commission has stated in its Communication on immigration, integration and employment (1) that within the context of the common immigration policy the only coherent approach to dealing with illegal residents is to ensure that they return to their country of origin. Some Member States have implemented regularisation measures for illegal residents. Regularisation procedures may be seen as a factor which enables the integration process to develop but also as an encouragement of further illegal immigration.

Bearing in mind these potential impacts, the issue of regularisation will be examined in the study on the links between legal and illegal migration that will be released by the Commission during the present Irish Presidency.

----

(1)  COM(2003) 336 final.

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-16-00423-CR 

Angela Osburn Collins 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

From County Court at Law No. 1 

of Parker County (CCL1-15-0114) 

March 1, 2018 

Opinion by Justice Kerr 

(nfp)

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________ 

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14
UNDER THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934





I, Kerry
W. Boekelheide, certify that:





1)           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Hotel Properties,
LLC;





2)           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3)           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4)           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5)           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);








(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Dated:
November 16, 2009





/s/
      Kerry W. BoekelheideKerry
      W. BoekelheideChief
      Executive Officer
Sadie J. CARTER and Helen C. Lytch, Plaintiffs, v. ST. AUGUSTINE'S UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

No. COA17-1008

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-05-032] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

October 14, 2005 at 11 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-298 and 299 (Second Review) (Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from China and Korea) and 701-TA-267 and 268 and 731-TA-304 and 305 (Second Review) Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Korea and Taiwan)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before October 27, 2005.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: October 6, 2005. 

*By order of the Commission:*

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05-20570 Filed 10-7-05; 3:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P