alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

t0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146601

ANNETTE BREARD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146601

COA: 310342

MCAC: 10

- 000100

EMPLOYMENT GROUP, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Presidential Documents 59981 

Proclamation 7943 of October 7, 2005 

Leif Erikson Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

More than 1,000 years ago, Leif Erikson left the coast of Greenland and 

began a journey to explore new lands. He made that voyage in the spirit 

of discovery and became one of the first Europeans known to have reached 

North America, inspiring stories of bountiful lands and charting a way 

for future explorers to follow. On Leif Erikson Day, we celebrate the accomplishments of Leif Erikson and his crew, and we honor the many contributions of Nordic Americans to our Nation. 

The journey of Leif Erikson reflects the spirit that has made America strong, 

as the desire to explore and understand is part of our national character. 

Today, we continue to push the frontiers of knowledge in many areas 

and especially with our exploration of space, drawn to the heavens as 

we were once drawn to the open seas. 

Generations of Nordic Americans have come to our country with a sense 

of determination and optimism, and they have helped build a stronger 

and more vibrant Nation. On Leif Erikson Day, we celebrate Nordic Americans, as well as the ties between America and the Nordic nations. We 

are joined by a common respect for liberty, human rights, and the dignity 

of every person. Working together, we are spreading freedom and hope, 

and we are helping to build a better and more compassionate world. 

To honor Leif Erikson, son of Iceland and grandson of Norway, and to 

celebrate our citizens of Nordic-American heritage, the Congress, by joint 

resolution (Public Law 88–566) approved on September 2, 1964, has authorized and requested the President to proclaim October 9 of each year as 

‘‘Leif Erikson Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2005, as Leif Erikson Day. I 

call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, 

activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–20657 

Filed 10–12–05; 9:18 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
STATE v. William Earl ASKEW

133P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

William Earl Askew, for Askew, William Earl.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of September 2018 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
**Exhibit 15.9**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-107433 on Form F-3/A of our report dated 3 March 2006(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note 2 and an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note 28) relating to the consolidated financialstatements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc for the year ended September 30, 2005. 

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 

Cambridge, United Kingdom 

3 March 2006
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 9 2000

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 00-15981

___________________

D.C. Docket No. 00-9009

NED L. SIEGEL,

GEORGETTE SOSA DOUGLAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

THERESA LEPORE,

CHARLES E. BURTON, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida

___________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

BEFORE: ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH,

DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and

WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. Judges Tjoflat, Birch, Dubina 

and Carnes dissent.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

/s/ R. Lanier Anderson III

 CHIEF JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ted Kozub,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer of Nitro
Petroleum  Incorporated  (the  "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
     ended April 30, 2006 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



By:         /s/ Ted Kozub

           -------------------------------------------
Name:      Ted Kozub
Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
           Chief Financial Officer
Date:      June 12 , 2005


This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB.  A
signed  original of this  statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
Argued and submitted November 8,

petition for review dismissed as improvidently allowed December 3, 1999

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Kenneth P. Bundy, Claimant. FRED MEYER, INC., *Respondent on Review, v.*Kenneth P. BUNDY, *Petitioner on Review, and*DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, *Respondent.*

(WCB 95-07510; CA A95905; SC S46365)

991 P2d 1058

Roger Ousey, of Bischoff, Strooband & Ousey, P.C., Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review Kenneth P. Bundy.

Craig A. Staples, Vancouver, Washington, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Megan A. Flynn, of Pozzi Wilson Atchison, LLP, Portland, filed a brief for *amicus curiae*Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

David L. Runner, Lead Appellate Counsel, Salem, filed a brief in the Court of Appeals for *amici curiae*SAIF Corporation and Timber Products Company.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.**

**

 Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

*504MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is dismissed as improvidently allowed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyler Deion GREENFIELD

No. 11A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 23, 2019

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Greenfield, Tyler Deion

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of January 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 23rd of January 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of January 2019."
STATE v. Darren Wayne GENTLE

240A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 15, 2018

Aaron Thomas Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Richard J. Costanza, Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, for Gentle, Darren Wayne.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of October 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of October 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 5th day of November 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. PAPER, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, CHEMICAL AND ENERGY WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 4-487, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant.

No. 02-11081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 10, 2003.

*441Elizabeth Anne Sehartz, Stephen F. Fink, Anthony J. Campiti, Thompson & Knight, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee.

James L. Hicks, Jr., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant.

*ON PETITION FOR REHEARING*

Before JONES, DUHÉ and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. Our opinion dated May 7, 2003, 328 F.3d 818, is modified in part, by replacing part III of that opinion with the following part III:

III.

The Union first disputes the district court’s limitation of the arbitration awards to the period before the Union was decertified. When the NLRB decertified the Union on September 18, 2000, the CBA automatically terminated by operation of law. *See Sheet Metal Workers’ Int’l Ass’n. Local 206 v. West Coast Sheet Metal Co.,*954 F.2d 1506 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that CBA became void prospectively as of the decertification of the Union). Courts should find an arbitrator’s award legitimate if “it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement.” *United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.,*363 U.S. 593, 597, 80 S.Ct. 1358, 1361, 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960). The three arbitrators in this case handed down their decisions before the Union was decertified and thus they could not have considered the effect of the award after termination of the CBA. *Compare id.*363 U.S. at 597-98, 80 S.Ct. 1358 (discussing arbitrator’s opinion which considered the effect of CBA’s expiration) with *Int’l Chem. Workers Union v. BASF Wyandotte Corp., 114,*F.2d 43, 45 (2nd Cir.1985) (in which arbitrator had handed down decision before new CBA and did not consider effect of award under the new agreement).

*442Reinstatement put the three employees in the same position as other employees formerly covered by the CBA. When the Union was decertified, such employees lost all job protection under the CBA. With no promise of continued employment, they could be discharged as at-will employees. *See Hospital Employees, Local 1273 v. Deaton Hosp. & Med. Ctr.,*671 F.Supp. 1049, 1051 (D.Md.1986). In such a case, the payment of back pay wages through the date the CBA expires has the practical effect of “reinstating” then re-terminating the employees. *Int’l Chem. Workers,*774 F.2d at 46. The court correctly amended the judgment to enforce the awards only through September 17, 2000.
#### STATE ex rel. Roy VANDERHOFF v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Vanderhoff, Roy;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 235-877; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-0968.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32



                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.


Dated:  February 20, 2007                  RIDGEWOOD ENERGY K FUND, LLC

                              By:     /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
                                    Name:  Robert E. Swanson
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  February 20, 2007
                              By:     /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
                                    Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry
                                   Title:  Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy K Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
PINE v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. #1552, et al.

335A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 3, 2018

Ms. Holly M. Stott, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. #1552, et al

Mr. M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. #1552, et al

Mr. David A. Shelby, Salisbury, Attorney at Law, For Pine, Patricia

Ms. Linda Stephens, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. #1552, et al

Mr. Vernon Sumwalt, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Advocates for Justice *517The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of June 2018 by Plaintiff to Deem Brief Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of August 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby Dewayne HELMS

No. COA18-12

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 10.11
                                                                EXECUTION COPY

                          DLJ Merchant Banking II, Inc.
                                11 Madison Avenue
                               New York, NY 10010

                                  July 20, 2004

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

AHC I Acquisition Corp.
c/o DLJ Merchant Banking II, Inc.
11 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference  is hereby  made to that  certain  Letter  Agreement  Assignment  (the
"Assignment"),  dated April 27, 2004, from Credit Suisse First Boston LLC to DLJ
Merchant Banking II, Inc. ("DLJMB") of the Letter Agreement,  dated December 12,
1997 (the "Agreement"),  between Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (as successor to
the interests of Donaldson,  Lufkin & Jenrette Securities  Corporation under the
Agreement) ("CSFB") and AHC I Acquisition Corp. (the "Company").

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and the  Assignment,  the Company  hereby
agrees to pay DLJMB a one-time fee (the "Financial Advisory Fee") of two million
dollars  ($2,000,000) in consideration for financial  advisory services rendered
to the Company by DLJMB in connection with the  consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger  Agreement (the "Merger  Agreement"),  dated July 20,
2004, by and among the Company,  AHC Merger,  Inc. and Fusion  Acquisition  LLC.
Payment of such  Financial  Advisory  Fee shall be made by the  Company to DLJMB
immediately upon the closing under the Merger Agreement.

                                               Very truly yours,

                                               DLJ MERCHANT BANKING II, INC.



                                               By: /s/ Michael Isikow
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Name:  Michael Isikow
                                                   Title: Principal


<PAGE>


ACCEPTED AND AGREED

AHC I ACQUISITION CORP.


By: /s/ Kenneth A. Budde
    --------------------------------
     Name:  Kenneth A. Budde
     Title: Chief Financial Officer
     Date:  July 20, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Brandon KAWELO, Defendant.

No. COA18-316

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

VACATED. REMANDED.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wilshire Bancorp, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joanne Kim, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Alex Ko, as Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

WILSHIREBANCORP, INC.

 

 
| Date: November 6,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Joanne Kim          |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Joanne Kim              |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                    |
|                         |   |                    |
| Date: November 6,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Alex Ko             |
|                         |   | Alex Ko                 |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 8



List of Principal Subsidiaries



|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       |  |                 |  |                                          |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Name of company          |  | Trading name(if applicable) |  | Country ofregistration (orincorporation) andoperation |  | Holding         |  | Proportionof votingrights andshares held |  | Nature of business     
|Bracklands Ltd*          |  | N/a                         |  | England and Wales                                     |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Property Co            
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|Clark Retail Ltd*        |  | TM Retail                   |  | Scotland                                              |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Retailing              
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|Dillons Stores Ltd*      |  | TM Retail                   |  | England and Wales                                     |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Retailing              
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|Forbuoys Ltd             |  | TM Retail                   |  | England and Wales                                     |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Retailing              
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|Martin Retail Group Ltd* |  | TM Retail                   |  | Scotland                                              |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Retailing              
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|TM Vending Ltd           |  | N/a                         |  | England and Wales                                     |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Corporate Activities   
|                         |  |                             |  |                                                       | 
|Tog Ltd*                 |  | N/a                         |  | England and Wales                                     |  | Ordinary shares |  | 100%                                     |  | Intermediate Holding Co



|* | 100% held by a subsidiary undertaking
|- | -------------------------------------