alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59030-59031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Membership of the Office of the Secretary Performance Review 
Board

AGENCY: Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of membership on the Office of the Secretary Performance 
Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), DOC announces the 
appointment of persons to serve as members of the Office of the 
Secretary (OS) Performance Review Board (PRB). The OS/PRB is 
responsible for reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior 
Executive Service (SES) members. The appointment of these members to 
the OS/PRB will be for a period of 24 months.

DATES: The effective date of service of appointees to the Office of the 
Secretary Performance Review Board is upon publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary King, Director, Office of 
Executive Resources, Office of Human Resources Management, Office of 
the Director, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 
(202) 482-3321.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The names, position titles, and type of 
appointment of the members of the OS/PRB are set forth below by 
organization:

Department of Commerce, Office of the Secretary, 2005-2007, Performance 
Review Board Membership

Office of the Secretary

    Fred L. Schwien, Director, Executive Secretariat; David S. 
Bohigian, Deputy

[[Page 59031]]

Director, Office of Policy and Strategic Planning; Richard Yamamoto, 
Director, Office of Security (Alternate).

Office of Assistant Secretary for Administration

    Lisa Casias, Deputy Director for Financial Policy.

Economic Development Administration

    Mary Pleffner, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Management Services 
and CFO.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    John E. Jones, Jr., Deputy Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services.

    Dated: October 5, 2005.
Mary King,
Director, Office of Executive Resources.
[FR Doc. 05-20348 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-B5-M
NUMBER 13-20-00175-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RONALD SHANKLIN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant was convicted of assault on a public servant and judgment was entered 

on September 16, 2019. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 28, 2020.

This Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a 
2

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the 

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

The trial court imposed sentence in this matter on September 16, 2019. Appellant 

filed his notice of appeal on March 28, 2020. On April 2, 2020, the Clerk of this Court 

notified appellant it appeared the appeal was not timely perfected, and the appeal would 

be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days. On April 6, 2020, the court

received correspondence from appellant’s attorney indicating agreement that the 

appellant did not timely file notice.

Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than six months after his sentencing was 

imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See 

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a 

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; 

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See

TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d

240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999)

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

GINA M. BENAVIDES

 Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

10th day of September, 2020.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻ

I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-17-0000815

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

BIG ISLAND FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

WILFRED E. AGUIAR, JR., Defendant-Appellee,

and COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, Garnishee-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

PUNA DIVISION

(CIVIL NO. 3RC16-1-0329)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant Big Island 

Federal Credit Union's October 21, 2022 Motion for 

Reconsideration, the papers in support, and the record, it 

appears that this court did not overlook or misapprehend a point 

of law or fact when it entered the October 12, 2022 Summary 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000815

03-NOV-2022

08:28 AM

Dkt. 67 ODMR
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻ

I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

2

Disposition Order. See Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure 

Rule 40(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for 

Reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, November 3, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)
AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOHN A BUTLER

John A. ButlerChief Financial OfficerClearwire CorporationAugust 9, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0120

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JACOB JON IDLAND,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until August 15, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 15 2022

07/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0120
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Mark L. Kay, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*





*Mark
        L. Kay*
 *Chief
        Executive Officer*
  *May
        23, 2006*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
Premier Entertainment Biloxi LLC, (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      o     The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form l0-Q for the period
            ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: May 12, 2006


/s/ Joseph L. Billhimer
-----------------------------------------------------------
Name: Joseph L. Billhimer
Title: President and Chief Operating Officer


/s/ Todd J. Raziano
-----------------------------------------------------------
Name: Todd J. Raziano
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dion Vernon Williams v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00783-CR

Trial court case number: 1577604

Trial court: County Criminal Court No. 9 of Tarrant County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court to determine whether to appoint 

counsel to represent appellant. A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed containing an order 

by the trial court appointing counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Gordon Goodman______

Acting individually 

Date: ___August 17, 2021____
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dex Media, Inc. (the"*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “*Report*”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Dated: November 10, 2004 /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.   Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.   Executive Vice President and
IZAB 

USTI 

/ 

H LANG-MIER 

Order entered October 3 , 2012 

In The 

Court of Zippeatti 

jfiftb 113 iotritt of Eexao at 3Daffaii 

No. 05-12-00681-CV 

CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS ET AL. Appellant 

V. 

SHERI DURHAM AND DENISE JENKINS, AS ADMINSTRATOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF JESSICA HALEY DURHAM, Appellees 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-01231-D 

ORDER 

The Court has before it appellants' September 28, 2012 unopposed joint motion for 

extension of time to file appellants' reply briefs. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS 

that any reply briefs be filed by October 18, 2012. 
Order entered October 3 , 2012 

In The 

Court of Zippeato 

jf iftb riiotritt of Texa5itMaui 

No. 05-12-00587-CV 

BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS, INC., Appellant 

V. 

BH DFW, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 14th District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-00921 

ORDER 

The Court has before it appellee's September 27, 2012 fourth motion for enlargement of 

time to file appellee's brief The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the brief 

tendered by appellee on September 27, 2012 be timely filed as of today's date. 
ELIZ A H LANG-MIE S 

JU 

Order issued October3, 2012 

In The 

Tourt iii Apptats 

Ififtil Bistrirt uI &rxas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00303-CV 

STOVALL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellant 

V. 

HIBBS FINANCIAL CENTER, LTD., Appellee 

ORDER 

The Court has before it appellee's September 27, 2012 motion for leave to file sur-reply, 

which is unopposed. The Court DENIES the motion.
#### Laura ELLIS, Barbara Langanbeck and Johnette Smith, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of John I. Albritton v. Shane SHOWS, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company and / or Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Chrysler Corporation, Takata, Inc., Takata North American, Inc., Irvin Automotive Products, Inc., Takata Corporation, Morton International, Inc., Thiokol Corporation, TRW, Inc., Parish of West Baton Rouge, and the State of Louisiana Through the Department of Transportation and Development.

No. 2003-CC-1290.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Ellis, Laura et al.; Langanbeck, Barbara; Smith, Johnette individually & behalf of; Albritton, John I. Estate of;—Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 1028592; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 2511.

Denied.
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Independent Accountant's Report


Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C.:

We have examined management's assertion about Companion Servicing Company's (the
Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, included
in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 26, 1999

<PAGE>

                      Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C.

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, Companion Servicing Company,
L.L.C. has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C. had in effect a fidelity bond errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $1,500,000.00.


                                        /s/ Dan Starowicz
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Dan Starowicz
                                   Vice President


                                        3-26-99
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Date:  March 26, 1999


                                        /s/ Randy McCurry
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Randy McCurry
                                   V.P. Chief Financial Officer


                                        3-26-99
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Date:  March 26, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7093

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT TALBERT; D. SWISHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7100

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MS. WOOD,

Defendant - Appellee.
2

No. 95-7221

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT BOYERS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Samuel J. Wilson,

District Judges. (CA-95-688-R, CA-95-691-R, CA-95-765)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed

the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Talbert, No. CA-95-688-R; Foley v. Wood, No.

CA-95-691-R; Foley v. Boyers, No. CA-95-765 (W.D. Va. July 18,

1995; Aug. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4887 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 19), 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that health coverage provided by the Department of Defense is treated as minimal essential coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4887 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Affirmation 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

5 HEALTH COVERAGE AS MINIMAL ESSENTIAL 

6 COVERAGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) 

9 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the fol12 lowing new clause: 

13 ‘‘(iv) medical coverage under chapter 

14 55 of title 10, United States Code, includ15 ing coverage under the TRICARE pro16 gram;’’; 

17 (2) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v); 

18 (3) by striking the period at the end of clause 

19 (vi) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

20 (4) by inserting after clause (vi) the following 

21 new clause: 

22 ‘‘(vii) the Nonappropriated Fund 

23 Health Benefits Program of the Depart24 ment of Defense, established under section 

25 349 of the National Defense Authorization 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4887 RFS 

1 Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 

2 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 1587 note).’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

5 1501(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

6 and shall be executed immediately after the amendments 

7 made by such section 1501(b). 

Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 15.8**

****

  

June 12, 2017

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E

Washington D.C 20549-7561

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

We have read Item 16F of Infosys Limited’sForm 20-F dated June 12, 2017 and we agree with the statements made in relation to Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP in Item 16Fof such Form 20-F. We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant containedtherein.

Yours Truly,

/s/ Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and as the
Chief Financial Officer of CompuCredit Corporation, respectively, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
CompuCredit Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

This 29th day of February 2008.



/s/    DAVID G. HANNADavid G. HannaChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board/s/    J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, IIIJ.Paul Whitehead, IIIChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CompuCredit Corporation and will be retained by CompuCredit
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Darren Wayne BLEVINS

No. 258P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, for Blevins, Darren Wayne.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Lisa B. Finkelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State.

*383***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th of August 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
ohgi_ex105.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 


5
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31 2010, I, Richard Pelletier, Chief Financial Officer of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.




Dated: May 21, 2010




/s/ Richard Pelletier


Richard Pelletier, Chief Financial Officer of


Excellency Investment Realty Trust, Inc.