alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

d0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

137000 & (85)

BRIAN EBBERS, JEFF STEINPORT, and KAREN NEAL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 137000 COA: 283782 Kent CC: 08-000699-CZ SECRETARY OF STATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and KENT COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Defendants-Appellees,

and

STATE REPRESENTATI VE ROBERT DEAN, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.
#### David Belais, Respondent, *v.*William A. Mallett, Appellant.

*Belais*v. *Mallett,*177 App. Drw 908, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted October 11, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 3, 1917, *unanimously*affirming a judg*618ment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action for libel. The respondent contended that the judgment was not appealable as of right to the Court of Appeals and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Willoughby B. Dobbs*and *Henry K. Davis*for appellant,

*■Herbert R. Limburg*and *Mortimer H. Hess*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

1 Concur: Hisgock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Heather A. COUSAR, Plaintiff, v. Carl R. MARTIN, and Elizabeth W. Martin, Named Defendants, and Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Unnamed Defendant.

No. COA18-268

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

DISMISSED.
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A)/15d-14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, William Dunavant, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this annual report my
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ William Dunavant

By: William Dunavant Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer

April 15, 2008

---
Vivian BAUCOM, Plaintiff, v. George VLAHOS, Defendant.

No. COA17-858

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 3, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
SYKES, et al. v. HEALTH NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.

251PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 2019

Robert E. Fields, III, Samuel Pinero, II, Leon E. Porter, Winston-Salem, Attorneys at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, for Sykes, Susan, et al.

Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Benjamin R. Norman, Greensboro, W. Michael Dowling, Attorney at Law, for Health Network Solutions, Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of January 2019 by Plaintiffs:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of January 2019."

Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 6th day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 12.2

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Guglielmo Noya, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of TIM Participações S.A.;

 

2.	Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.	I am responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

a)	Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)	Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)	Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.	I have disclosed, based on my mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)	All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Dated:	April 14, 2016
## NO. 12

- 0 9

- 00 245

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

PINEYWOODS COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL ' APPEAL FROM THE 159TH

INSTITUTION AND PINEYWOODS

HOME TEAM AFFORDABLE

HOUSING, APPELLANTS

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRI CT CO URT OF

ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY

LOAN FUND, INC.

, ' ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In their motion, Appellants

state that they have reached a resolution of this d ispute and no longer wish to pursue the

appeal. Because Appellants have met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

.

Opinion delivered June 23 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen , C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6080

LARRY L. DUPONT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA00-1007-S) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Larry L. Dupont, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry L. Dupont seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Dupont v. Kupec , No. CA-00-1007- S (D. Md. Dec. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Global-e-Investments, Inc.

2925 N. 67 th Place  Scottsdale, AZ  85251







Letter of Understanding for Consulting Services



This Agreement is entered into by and between Global-e-Investments,Inc.,hereafter Consultant, and Vistal Golf Club, hereafter the Company.



The undersigned do hereby covenant, contract and agree as follows:



1.

Scope of Services:  Consultant is hereby engaged to perform consulting services to The Company including, but not limited to the following:

Public Relations, and Business Plan Development to include and focus primarily on Tee Sheet Reservation Improvement and Public Awareness.



2.

Initial Fee:  The Company agrees to pay the Consultant a nonrefundable Initial fee of $5000. Payment shall be due upon receipt of  invoice.



3.

Limited Services:  The Consultant will assist the company in accordance to the scope of services.  Services not included in the Scope of Service may be performed by the Consultant at the request of the Company for a fee of $90/hour, pending discussion and approval by both the Consultant and the Company.



4.

Confidential Information:  Consultant expressly agrees not to divulge, publish, or communicate any information regarding the Company, or its financial conditions to any persons without the express written consent of the Company.  All information obtained by the Consultant during this engagement and all suggestions and recommendations received by the Company will remain the property of the Company and the Consultant shall keep all such matters confidential.



5.

Term:  The term of this engagement shall commence on September 3, 2004 and shall remain in effect unless terminated in writing, with 30 days notice, by either the Company or the Consultant.



6.

In the event that it becomes necessary to enforce any of the terms of this agreement the defaulting party agrees to pay all reasonable attorney fees incurred therein.



7.

This agreement may only be modified in writing and contains the entire terms of the agreement between the parties.



Signed and Witnessed by both parties on  September 3, 2004.





/s/John Shaffer

/s/ Del Cochran

John Shaffer, et al

Vistal Golf Club



Global-e-Investments, Inc

Del Cochran

Consultant                                                    
Company
Venus Joyner JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

No. COA17-1159

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.
In the MATTER OF the Appeal of: MAXTON SOLAR 1, LLC, and ZV Solar 1, LLC, Appellants

From the decision of the Robeson County Board of Equalization and Review to deny the partial exclusion of certain personal property for tax year 2016

No. COA18-393

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard DUNSTON

No. 401A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed May 11, 2018

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Eugene IVEY

No. COA17-1266

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
January 8 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MICHAEL ALDOUS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01013

- CV V.

ERIC BRUSS, SILVIA S ANDOVAL, DEBBIE AND DALE O'CONNOR

, Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 30, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by r eason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Michael Aldous.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
STATE v. Douglas Wayne STANALAND

333P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Douglas Wayne Stanaland, for Stanaland, Douglas Wayne

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of October 2018 by Defendant for Discovery:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Toscano, certify that:


      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of U. S. Precious Metals,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: January 17, 2006.

/s/ Peter Toscano
-----------------------
Peter Toscano
(President and CEO)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO**

 

Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Furnished but not filed)

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Favrille, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, JohnP. Longenecker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Favrille, Inc.,certify that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Favrille, Inc..

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Favrille, Inc. and will beretained by Favrille, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date   | May 13, 2005 |                                  | By | /s/ John P. Longenecker |   |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------|----|------------------------------|--------|
|   |         | John P. Longenecker, Ph.D.,           |
|   |         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4443 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4443 EH

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUAN MARIEL ALCANTARA POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New 

5 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel 

11 Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4443 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. New York, New York, as the ‘‘Corporal Juan al Service located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ER NESTO MARTE LL

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 0 00 180

- C R

Appeal from the

Criminal Distr i ct Cou rt No. 1

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 990D03958 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until June 4

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Maya I. Quevedo Stevenson

, the Appellant ’ s

attorney, prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 4

,

201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of May

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.