alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bar Docket No. 07047

#### In the Matter of Carl A. Fleming, *Respondent.*

(998 P.2d 1141)

Dated this 4th day of May, 2000.

In a letter dated May 1, 2000, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Carl A. Fleming, of Eudora, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 246).

At the time respondent surrendered his license, a panel report from a disciplinary hearing held on January 12, 2000, had been docketed with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts. In that panel hearing report, there were findings that respondent was dilatory in the handling of a workers compensation case and had misrepresented the status of the case to his client for an extensive period of time. Four additional complaints were being investigated by the Disciplinary Administrator’s office at the time respondent surrendered his license.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Carl A. Fleming be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Carl A. Fleming from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 250).
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Telefônica Brasil S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Melcon Sanchez-Friera,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | Date: February 23, 2017 |                                
| | ----------------------- | -------------------------------
| |                         |                                
| | By:                     | /s/ David Melcon Sanchez-Friera
| |                         | Name:                          
| |                         | Title:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Hector Estrada, Isela Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales V.

Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire

Appellate case number: 01-14-00014-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-01183

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 21, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellees, Lyndon and Daner Cheshire

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown

Date: October 20, 2015
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7510** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. WILLIE MITCHELL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00562

- DCN

- 1 ; 2:14

- cv - 02580

- DCN )

Submitted : February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Willie Mitchell , Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willie Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) ( 20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demons trating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mitchell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
CROWELL v. CROWELL

31A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 18, 2018

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Crowell, Andrea Kirby.

Amy Simpson Fiorenza, Attorney at Law, for Crowell, William Worrell.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of December 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 18th day of January 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### Joel DELGADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 22, 2003.

Joel Delgado, Indiantown, Pro Se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. ■

We affirm the defendant’s sentence on the authority of *Hersey v. State, 831*So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). *Accord Green v. State,*832 So.2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We certify conflict with *Green v. State,*839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SHARP, W., PLEUS, and MONACO, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067354
<NAME> FANTASMA LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                       373
<INVENTORY>                                      3,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,273
<PP&E>                                              24
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,654
<SALES>                                         14,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,645
<CGS>                                           10,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    197
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6696

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:03-cv-000250-SGW)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order

denying Turner’s motion to reconsider a previous order dismissing

this action for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Turner v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 7:03-cv000250-SGW (W.D. Va. April 30, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1






Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






I,
William C. Bayless, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of American Campus Communities,
Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (i)The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (ii)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: 
       August 11, 2008
              /s/
      William C. Bayless, Jr.William
      C. Bayless, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                       672
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,654,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                 256,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,629,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,490,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,897,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,629,601
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               551,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152,604
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04


</TABLE>
#### In re EQUICREDIT CORP. MORTGAGE LENDING PRACTICES LITIGATION Deborah Hines, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., N.D. Mississippi, C.A. No. 2:03-64 Gregory Crocker, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., S.D. Mississippi, C.A. No. 2:03-85 Melvin Wilson, et al. v. Bank Of America Corp., et al., S.D. Mississippi, C.A. No. 3:03-232 Dianne C. Busby, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., S.D. Mississippi, C.A. No. 3:03-243

No. MDL-1545.

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Aug. 5, 2003.

*1382Before WM. TERRELL HODGES,* Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, BRUCE M. SELYA, JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, D. LOWELL JENSEN,* J. FREDERICK MOTZ and ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., Judges of the Panel.

*

 Judges Hodges and Jensen took no part in the decision of this matter

*ORDER DENYING TRANSFER*

JOHN F. KEENAN, Acting Chairman.

This litigation currently consists of four actions pending in two districts as follows: three actions in the Southern District of Mississippi and one action in the Northern District of Mississippi. Affiliated common defendants Bank of America Corp., Bank of America, N.A., Equicredit Corp., Equi-credit Corp. of America and Nationscredit Financial Services Corp. move the Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for an order centralizing this litigation in the Southern District of Mississippi. Plaintiffs in the four actions oppose transfer.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that Section 1407 centralization would neither serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses nor further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. Movants have failed to persuade us that any common questions of fact and law in this docket consisting of only four actions in two adjoining districts within the same state are sufficiently complex, unresolved and/or numerous to justify Section 1407 transfer. We point out that alternatives to transfer exist that can minimize whatever possibilities there might be of duplicative discovery and/or inconsistent pretrial rulings. *See, e.g., In re Eli Lilly and Company (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litigation,*446 F.Supp. 242, 244 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1978). *See also Manual for Complex Litigation, Third,*§ 31.14 (1995).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of these four actions is denied.
#### Nancy Davis JUDSON, et al. v. Hall DAVIS, IV, President, Hall Mortuary, Inc.

No. 2003-OC-2341.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 20, 2003.

In re Judson, Nancy Davis et al.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 32,738; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2003 CA 0970.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the court of appeal for its consideration.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ.
<PAGE>

         AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of August 30, 1999, to WARRANT AGREEMENT
dated as of September 15, 1998 (the "Original Agreement") between Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Insignia/ESG
Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"), and APTS PARTNERS, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership ("APTS"), providing for the issuance of warrants to purchase 316,667
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation.

         WHEREAS, the Corporation and APTS desire to extend the Expiration Date
(as defined in the Original Agreement) of the Warrants provided for in the
Original Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Original
Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         2. The Expiration Date of the Warrants is hereby extended from
September 1, 1999 to September 15, 1999.

         3. Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Original Agreement
is hereby ratified and conformed in all respects.

         4. Any Warrant Certificate evidencing Warrants need not be amended to
reflect the change in Expiration Date provided for herein in order to give full
effect to such change.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1
to the Original Warrant Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their
proper and duly authorized officers, as of the date and year first above
written.

                                  INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                  By: /s/ Adam B. Gilbert
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name:  Adam B. Gilbert
                                      Title: Executive Vice President

                                  APTS PARTNERS, L.P.
                                  By: APTS GP Partner, L.P., its general partner
                                  By: APTS Acquisition Corporation, its general
                                        partner

                                  By: /s/ John R. S. Jacobsson
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name:  John R. S. Jacobsson
                                      Title: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Multi-Market Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,643,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,719<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,030,735<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,030,735<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (52,906)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               795,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (848,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (848,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (848,874)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>

<F1> Receivables include interest receivable of $28,719.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $358,067.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $108,909 and accrued
management fees of $20,077.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $(473,435), net
change in unrealized of $94,417 and interest income of $326,112.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general
partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 29, 2008                                                              
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                             
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                 
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
IN RE: T.T.E.

238A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 14, 2019

Michelle F. Lynch, Attorney at Law, for T.T.E.

Janelle E. Varley, Assistant Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 14th of January 2019 by Juvenile:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of January 2019."

Juvenile shall have up to and including the 27th day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.