alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-05 1910-BJ-5RK4]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to the plats 
of surveys of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days from 
the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were executed at the request 
of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and are necessary for the managements. 
The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the south boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, 
the subdivision of certain sections, the survey of a portion of the 
present right bank of the Wind River, and the metes and bounds Survey 
of Parcel A, section 33, Township 4 North, Range 3 West, Wind River 
Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted September 29, 2005.
    Copies of the preceding described plat and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. 05-20383 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4725 

To provide for the acquisition by the Army Corps of Engineers of the 

hurricane barrier for the city of New Bedford, Massachusetts, and the 

town of Fairhaven, Massachusetts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the acquisition by the Army Corps of Engineers of the hurricane barrier for the city of New Bedford, Massachusetts, and the town of Fairhaven, Massachusetts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEW BEDFORD-FAIRHAVEN HURRICANE BAR4 RIER. 

5 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Army, act6 ing through the Corps of Engineers, as authorized by sec7 tion 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (Public Law 

8 85–500), may acquire all right, title, and interest of the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4725 IH

1 city of New Bedford, Massachusetts, and the town of 

2 Fairhaven, respectively, in and to the New Bedford3 Fairhaven hurricane barrier, including any interest of the 

4 city and the town in and to land and any structures re5 quired for the operation and maintenance, repair, replace6 ment, rehabilitation, and structural integrity of such hur7 ricane barrier if an offer is made by the city of New Bed8 ford, Massachusetts, and the town of Fairhaven, Massa9 chusetts, to convey such right, title, and interest to the 

10 Secretary. Such acquisition shall conform to the following 

11 requirements: 

12 (1) Any such conveyance shall be by quitclaim 

13 deed and without consideration. 

14 (2) Subject to the availability of appropriations 

15 for such purpose, any such conveyance shall occur 

16 not later than two years after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act. 

18 (b) EASEMENT.—As part of the conveyance under 

19 subsection (a), the city of New Bedford and the town of 

20 Fairhaven may retain an easement authorizing the con21 struction by the city and the town of a boardwalk and 

22 the recreational use of such boardwalk. 

23 (c) ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY.—Upon the 

24 completion of the acquisition under subsection (a), the 

25 Secretary shall be responsible for the operation and mainVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:49 Mar 03, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4725.IH H4725

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4725 IH

1 tenance, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and structural 

2 integrity of such hurricane barrier in coordination with the 

3 city of New Bedford and the town of Fairhaven. 

4 (d) RECREATIONAL USE DEFINED.—In this section, 

5 the term ‘‘recreational use’’ means the use of a bike path, 

6 pedestrian path, boardwalk, and a non-commercial fishing 

7 pier. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      L.
      Kay, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*


*Mark
      L. Kay*


*Chief
      Executive Officer*




*August
      14, 2007*
II 

Calendar No. 500 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4626 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2014 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To ensure access to certain information for financial services 

industry regulators, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SAFE Act Confiden5 tiality and Privilege Enhancement Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4626 PCS

1 SEC. 2. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION SHARED BE2 TWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL FINANCIAL 

3 SERVICES REGULATORS. 

4 Section 1512(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing 

5 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5111(a)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘or financial services’’ before ‘‘industry’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 500 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4626 

AN ACT 

To ensure access to certain information for finanpurposes. cial services industry regulators, and for other 

JULY 30, 2014 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

CHRISTOPHER DEWITT

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1: 23

- cv

- 02738 ( UNA )

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

, et al., )

)

Defendant s

. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Currently before the C ourt is P laintiff’s pro se complaint

, ECF No. 1, and application for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) , ECF No. 2. The C ourt will grant P laintiff’s IFP

application and, f or the reasons explained herein, it will dismiss this matter without prejudice.

Plaintiff sues the District of Columbia, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department ’s 7th

Prec i n ct , and D.C. Police Commander John Branch. He purports to bring this case pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983, and broadly seek s damages for “inhumane treatment and aggravated circumstances

while in custody of [ the ] 7 th precinct.” The remainder of the complaint is left largely blank, with

no facts, context, or details necessary to state , or even so much as infer, a legal claim.

P ro se litigants must comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F.

Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires a complaint to

contain “(1) a short and plain stateme nt of the grounds for the court’ s jurisdiction [and]

. . . (2) a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” F ed. R. Civ.

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal

, 556 U.S. 662, 678

- 79 (2009). The Rule 8 standard ensures that

defendants receive fair notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive

answer and an adequate defense. Brown v. Califano

, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977 ). Here, a spresented

, neither the C ourt nor D efendant s can reasonably be expected to identify P laintiff’s

claims , and the allegations fall well short of stating a plausible claim

.

For these reasons

, this case is dismissed without prejudice

. A separate o rder accompanies

this memorandum o pinion.

Date: November 27, 2023

/s/_________________________

ANA C. REYES

United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Beta Cell Regeneration for Diabetes Therapy.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         D.G. Patel, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 755, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7682,                         *pateldg@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20219  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 The Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2178

___________ Mary J. Roselli, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Paul H. O'Neill, * Secretary of the Treasury, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 14, 2004 Filed: March 15, 2004

___________ Before BYE, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mary Roselli appeals from a final order entered in the district court 1 granting summary judgment in an employment discrimination action in favor of her employer, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Roselli claimed that she was discriminated against on the basis of her age, gender, and race in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29-2- U.S.C. § 621, et seq . She also claims that after filing her Equal Employment Opportunity complaints, she was retaliated against when she was not promoted to various positions at the IRS. The district court granted the IRS summary judgment on each of Roselli's eight allegations, concluding that Roselli had failed to exhaust heradministrative remedies as to some claims, failed to show that the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her non-selection was pretextual as to other claims, and failed to show that she was subjected to an adverse employment action to support her retaliation claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial court's disposition of this matter. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

_______________________________
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
of White Mountain Titanium Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  November
12, 2010





/s/ C.E. JenkinsCharles
      E. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of
White Mountain Titanium Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  November
12, 2010





/s/ C.E. JenkinsMichael
      P. Kurtanjek, President  & Chief Executive
      Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  --------------------------------------------------------------------  In connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Joseph Corrao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 13, 2008  /s/ Mark Joseph Corrao Mark Joseph Corrao Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
Dr. Bernard Beer
30 Winston Drive
Apartment 2816

Cliffside Park, J 07010

Dear Bernie,

      This will confirm the economic and other arrangements we have agreed to,
subject to compensation committee approval. We have since secured that approval.

      In recognition of your founder status and the continuing extraordinary and
substantial contributions that you have made to the company over the past eight
years, DOV will pay you, in a lump sum, an amount equal to one year's salary
($365,750) plus an additional amount equal to your COBRA obligations for one
year ($11,000), total $376,750. The lump sum will be paid in the normal course,
that is, seven days after signing the agreement referred to below. Your accrued
vacation time in the amount of $56,269.20 will be included in your final pay
through March 15.

      While there are no specific consulting requirements, you and I have agreed
that you will make yourself available as a consultant, subject to your personal
schedule and travel, to review and give guidance on our clinical development
program to me and Dr. Stern and other members of his clinical staff, and that
this consulting work would be on the basis of $1,500 per day. Your office and
secretarial help will be available to you until the end of 2004.

      You would be required to sign our normal severance and general release
agreement, covering among other things non-competition, continued
confidentiality and a general release. Since your present employment agreement
will terminate upon your retirement, all rights under that agreement terminate
including any right to incentive compensation, bonuses, milestone payments,
stock option plan grants, automobile allowance, life insurance and a company
sale bonus.

                                        1

               433 Hackensack Avenue, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

<PAGE>

      It gives me, personally, and the board tremendous comfort to know that you
will continue to be available to the company on the terms outlined, since we and
your fellow board members so highly value your strategic judgment. Very
important clinical studies must be planned and launched in 2004 and we will
count on your help.

Most sincerely;


/s/ Arnold Lippa
-----------------------------------
Arnold Lippa

Agreed:

/s/ Bernard Beer
-----------------------------------
Bernard Beer

cc:  Zola Horovitz
     Dan Van Riper
#### STATE ex rel. Charles Ray SPEARS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2184.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Spears, Charles Ray;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 41918; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 KW 0213.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

WEIMER, J., recused.
STATE v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational *387Fund, Inc. to admit Jin Hee Lee Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 20

- 00205

- CV

__________________ OBERHEIDEN LAW GROUP, PLLC, NICK OBERHEIDEN, OBERHEIDEN, P.C., AND OBERHEIDEN & MCMURREY, LP , Appellant s
V.
CORROSION RESISTANT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 58th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 202,825

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Oberheiden Law Group, PLLC, Nick Oberheiden, Oberheiden, P.C., and Oberheiden & McMurrey, LP , a ppellants, filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this
accelerated appeal w ith prejudice

. When, as here, the appellants move to dismiss, the Court may dismiss the appeal “unless such disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.” Tex. R. App. P.2 42.1(a)(1). On this record, the exce ption in Rule 42.1 does not apply. The Cou r t grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMSSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 4, 2021 Opinion Delivered October 28, 2021 Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.1 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PETER CHAMBRÉ PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Chambré, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atthe dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Date: December 16, 2004