alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Kevin RIVERA-MARQUEZ, Defendant.

No. COA17-1319

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

NO ERROR.
Robert THOMSON, Plaintiff v. Johanna (Thomson) HOLLING, Defendant

No. COA17-734

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
#### Kenneth J. STETSON, as personal representative of the Estate of Frances R. Stetson, deceased, and Kenneth J. Stetson, individually, Appellant, v. EXTENDICARE, INC., Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., f/k/a Unicare Health Facilities, Inc., Extendicare Homes, Inc., f/k/a Unicare Homes, Inc., Extendicare Health Services, Inc., d/b/a The Arbors At Lakeland, Clark Burma, individually, and Daniel R. Davis, individually, Appellees.

No. 2D02-5395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2003.

Rebecca O’Dell Townsend of Haas, Dut-ton, Capito, Blackburn, Lewis & Longley, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.

Jamie Billotte Moses and Michael R. Willis of Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley *&*Dunlap, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Kenneth J. Stetson, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Frances R. Stetson, his wife, appeals the dismissal of his complaint with prejudice. We conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint and reverse.

Frances Stetson was a resident of the Arbors at Lakeland, and while being transported by Independent Community Transport (ICT), she fell from her wheelchair. Frances Stetson sustained injuries as a result of the fall, and less than one month later she died. Kenneth Stetson initially sued ICT, and the case was tried before a jury. During the trial, Stetson and ICT reached a settlement agreement, and as part of the agreement, Stetson agreed to assign to ICT his right to damages awarded in his suit against the Arbors.

Thereafter, ICT and Stetson both filed suit against the appellees, alleging negligence and a violation of Frances Stetson’s rights pursuant to section 440.022, Florida Statutes (1997). This complaint was dismissed upon the appellees’ motion, which alleged that the assignment between Stetson and ICT was improper. A second complaint was dismissed on the same ground.

Stetson then filed the complaint at issue individually and as personal representative of his wife’s estate. The trial court also dismissed this complaint upon the appel-lees’ motion, ruling that the assignment between Stetson and ICT was improper and was therefore void. We conclude that *768the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice because, regardless of whether Stetson’s assignment to ICT was valid, ICT was no longer a party to the action and the assignment did not foreclose Stetson from filing suit against the appellees.

The appellees request this court to affirm based on other grounds raised in their motion to dismiss. However, we decline to do so because it would require us to improperly look beyond the. four corners of the complaint. *Hayward &*Assocs. *v. Hoffman,*826 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Therefore, the order dismissing the complaint is reversed.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

STRINGER and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.
John Fletcher CHURCH v. Jean Marie DECKER (formerly Church)

No. 38P10-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

William W. Respess, Jr., Attorney at Law, Marshall Hurley, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Decker, Jean Marie (formerly Church).

John Fletcher Church, for Church, John Fletcher.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 19th of June 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of June 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
aena_ex1011.htm


EXHIBIT 10.11


 





 




  





1











  




 





 




  





2











  







 




  





3











  




 






4
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ERNESTO MARTELL,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-000180-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 990D03958)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until June 4, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Maya I. Quevedo Stevenson, the Appellant’s

attorney, prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 4,

2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of May, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MortgageIT Holdings, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) for the quarterly period endedSeptember  30,  2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), Doug W. Naidus, as Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

|        |  |  |                                                                   |
|--------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |  |  | /s/DOUG W. NAIDUS                                                 |
|   |  |  | Doug W. Naidus Chairmanand Chief Executive OfficerNovember 8,2006 |
|        |

This certification accompanies theReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Develocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jimmy B. Holton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jimmy B. Holton

Jimmy B. Holton

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 16, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 466 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 466

     To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the 
  Commissioner of Social Security from publishing the social security 
numbers of deceased individuals in the Death Master File, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2013

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the 
  Commissioner of Social Security from publishing the social security 
numbers of deceased individuals in the Death Master File, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Death Master File 
Privacy Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PUBLICATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS 
              IN THE DEATH MASTER FILE.

    (a) In General.--Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(I)(i) The Commissioner of Social Security may not publish in the 
Death Master File (or any other public database maintained by the 
Commissioner that contains information relating to the death of 
individuals) the social security account number of any deceased 
individual.
    ``(ii) The Commissioner shall not be compelled to disclose the 
social security account number of any deceased individual to any member 
of the public under section 552 of title 5, United States Code. For 
purposes of such section, this clause shall be considered a statute 
described in subsection (b)(3)(B) of such section.''.
    (b) Information Sharing With Federal and State Agencies.--Section 
205(r)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 405(r)(3)) is amended by inserting 
after ``such information'' the following: ``(including information 
related to a deceased individual received by the Commissioner other 
than as described in paragraph (1))''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jose Perez, Appellant, v Thomas Ricks, as Superintendent of New York State Department of Correction, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 896]

Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lahtinen, J.), entered March 9, 2000 in Franklin County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Following an October 1998 hearing at which he was denied release on parole, petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding claiming that the Board of Parole erred in denying his request because he had obtained an order of conditional parole for deportation only. Inasmuch as petitioner reappeared before the Board in October 2000 and his request for parole was again denied, his appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see, *Matter of Estabrook v Travis,*273 AD2d 694; *Matter of Atkins v New York State Bd. of Parole,*273 AD2d 656).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 
 Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation 
 Named Executive Officer
Annualized Salaries 
 The table below summarizes the annualized salaries of Horace Mann Educators
Corporation’s (the “Company”) Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the other three highest compensated Executive Officers, as defined in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders (collectively the “Named Executive Officers”). These salaries may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Company. These salaries do not include short-term and
long-term incentive compensation amounts, the Company’s contributions to defined contribution plans and the Company’s contributions to other employee benefit programs on behalf of these individuals. 

 

			
	Named Executive Officer	  	Annualized Salary
	 Peter H. Heckman

    President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$700,000.00
	 Dwayne D. Hallman

    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$400,008.00
	 Stephen P. Cardinal

    Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
	  	$412,008.00
	 Thomas C. Wilkinson

    Executive Vice President, Property & Casualty
	  	$338,004.00
	 Matthew P. Sharpe

    Executive Vice President, Annuity & Life
	  	$325,008.00

 Last revision date: April 1, 2013
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-57103) of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. of our report dated
February 24, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. which appears in this Form 10-K.

|/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 24, 2004 |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Sun  River  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Wesley
F.  Whiting,  CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley F. Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley F. Whiting,  CEO

Dated:  August 14, 2007
HARRIS v. IREDELL COUNTY, et al.

310P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Christopher Charles Harris, for Harris, Christopher Charles.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of September 2018 by Plaintiff to Compel Iredell County Superior Court to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed as Indigent:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
Exhibit 4.2


 





AMENDMENT
No. 6 TO


GREEN BALLAST,
INC.


8% SENIOR
SECURED NOTE


 


This
Amendment NO. 6, dated as of May 15, 2013 (the “Amendment”), to the 8% Senior Secured Note, dated as
of April 15, 2011, as amended from time to time (the “GBL Note”), by Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
issued the GBL Note to Green Ballast LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company (the “Holder”) on April 15,
2011, with a stated Maturity Date as defined therein of two (2) years following said date, the same being April 15, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holder desire to enter into this Amendment to extend the Maturity Date.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Company and the Holder
agree as follows:


 


1.                 
The Maturity Date is hereby extended to and including July 15, 2013.


 


2.                 
Except to the extent amended hereby, the GBL Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.                 
All capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in
the GBL Note.


 


4.                 
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original document. Electronic
signatures, whether by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means, shall be treated as original signatures.


 


 


 


[Signature page
to follow.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year
first set forth above.


 





	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Kevin Adams
	 	Name:

        Title:
	Kevin
    Adams

    Chief Executive Officer


 


	 	HOLDER:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST LLC
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Mary F. Sharp
	 	Name:

        Title:
	Mary
    F. Sharp

    President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10.3.2

                          AMENDMENT TO MEMBER AGREEMENT
                          -----------------------------


     The undersigned, being parties to the Member Agreement, dated June 19/23,
1998, as previously amended, do agree that Section A.1 is hereby amended by
changing the third line to read as follows: "For the period commencing on the
date hereof and ending June 30, 1999, "First Exercise".

     The Member Agreement remains in full force and effect, amended and
unmodified, except to the extent expressly set forth above.

     The undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the 26th day of March,
1999.

                                             AAi.FosterGrant, Inc.


                                             By   /s/ Duane DeSisto
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


                                                  /s/ Paul Michaels
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Paul Michaels
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4628 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize additional leave for 

members of the Armed Forces in connection with the birth of a child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2014 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. RICHMOND, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CONYERS, 

Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, Ms. KUSTER, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of 

New York, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Mr. NUGENT, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Ms. BROWNLEY of 

California, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. DELBENE, 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. PRICE of 

Georgia, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mrs. BLACK, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. HARRIS, 

Mr. VEASEY, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. BARBER, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. POLIS, Ms. HANABUSA, 

Ms. BASS, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. 

WESTMORELAND, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

SOUTHERLAND, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. PEARCE, Ms. HAHN, 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. BUCSHON, 

Mr. VARGAS, Ms. TITUS, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, and Mr. COFFMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize additional leave for members of the Armed Forces in connection with the birth of a child. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4628 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Opportunities 

3 for Mothers Act’’ or the ‘‘MOM Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF ADDITIONAL LEAVE FOR MEM5 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES IN CONNEC6 TION WITH THE BIRTH OF A CHILD. 

7 Section 701(j) of title 10, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 

10 paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; 

11 (2) by inserting after ‘‘(j)’’ the following new 

12 paragraph (1): 

13 ‘‘(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

14 concerned, a member of the armed forces who gives birth 

15 to a child shall receive 42 days of convalescent leave to 

16 be used in connection with the birth of the child. At the 

17 discretion of the member, the member shall be allowed up 

18 to 42 additional days in a leave of absence status in con19 nection with the birth of the child upon the expiration of 

20 the convalescent leave, except that— 

21 ‘‘(A) a member who uses this additional leave 

22 is not entitled to basic pay for any day on which 

23 such additional leave is used, but shall be considered 

24 to be on active duty for all other purposes; and 

25 ‘‘(B) the commanding officer of the member 

26 may recall the member to duty from such leave of 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4628 IH

1 absence status when necessary to maintain unit 

2 readiness.’’; and 

3 (3) in paragraph (3), as redesignated, by strik4 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1) 

5 and (2)’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS