alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-5179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 2003.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Robert Warren appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2002). We reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

The trial court found that Warren’s motion for postconviction DNA testing failed to comply with the procedural requirements of rule 3.853 because the mo*818tion “does not demonstrate or allege that the evidence is still available.” A postcon-viction motion for DNA testing is governed by rule 3.853 and section 925.11. Both the rule and the statute require that the mov-ant include a description of the physical evidence containing DNA to be tested and, if known, the present location or last known location of the evidence and how it was originally obtained. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1); *see also*§ 925.11(2)(a)(l). Neither the rule nor the statute requires that the movant allege that the evidence is still available to be tested. The motion must be sworn to by the movant, and whether or not the evidence is still in existence is likely to be beyond the knowledge of the movant, especially where, as here, the movant is incarcerated.

In his motion, Warren alleged, inter aha, that hair and semen samples were taken from the person of the victim by Bayfront Medical Center’s Rape Crisis Unit, the St. Petersburg Police Department, or the Pinellas County Sheriffs Office. He further alleged that the evidence was then turned over to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement or the Federal Bureau of Investigation for forensic testing. Pursuant to the requirements of the rule and the statute, Warren is obligated to provide information regarding the location of the evidence only if he has knowledge of said location. It would be preferable that if a movant has no knowledge regarding the location of the evidence, he so state in the motion. Warren listed several agencies that might have had, or might have, possession of the evidence in question, and we conclude that although inartfully drafted, Warren’s motion satisfied the requirement that he provide, if known, “the present location or the last known location of the evidence.”

Because we conclude that Warren also complied with the other requirements of rule 3.853 and section 925.11, and therefore filed a facially sufficient motion for postconviction DNA testing, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand with instructions to the trial court to order the prosecuting authority to respond to the motion. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gary Harris , Appellant

No. 06

- 20

- 00086

- CV v.

Paris Housing Authority , Appellee Appeal from the County Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. C

- 11620 ). Opinion deliv ered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below and reverse and remand the matter to the trial court with instru ctions to abate the

underlying a ction until sufficient notice is provided and the proper procedures have been

followed. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and rema nd the cause for further

proceedings.

We further order that the appell ee, Paris Housing Authority , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 30, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. A utrey , Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

R.L.C.,

 Respondent

 v.

J.M.C.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 818 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59390-59391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending September 
23, 2005

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22542.
    Date Filed: September 21, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 456--Resolution 010w. TC3 Within South East Asia 
Special Passenger Amending Resolution between China (excluding Hong 
Kong SAR, Macao SAR) and Russia (in Asia).
    Intended effective date: October 15, 2005.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22564.
    Date Filed: September 23, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

    TC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference Teleconference, July 
25-27, 2005.
    TC1 Longhaul (except between USA and Chile, Panama) Resolutions 
(Memo PTC1 0330).
    TC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference Teleconference, July 
25-27, 2005.
    TC1 Areawide Resolutions (PTC1 0333).
    Minutes: TC1 Teleconference, July 25-27, 2005 (Memo PTC1 338).
    Tables: TC1 Longhaul specified fare table (Memo PTC1 0104).
    Technical Correction: TC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference

[[Page 59391]]

Teleconference, July 25-27, 2005.
    TC1 Longhaul (except between USA and Chile, Panama) (Memo PTC1 
0336).
    Intended effective date: January 1, 2005.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22565.
    Date Filed: September 23, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

    TTC1 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference.
    Teleconference, July 25-27, 2005.
    TC1 Caribbean Resolutions (PTC1 0332).
    Minutes: TC1 Teleconference, July 25-27, 2005 (Memo PTC1 338).
    Tables: TC1 Caribbean specified fare table (Memo PTC1 0103).
    Technical Correction: TC1 Caribbean specified fare table (Memo PTC1 
0105).
    Intended effective date: November 1, 2005.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-20401 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

             CERTIFICATION OF JOHN ASTON PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, John Aston, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge
Antibody Technology Group plc;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;


                                                          Date: October 14, 2003

                                             /s/ John Aston
                                             ___________________________________
                                             Name: John Aston
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### The TIMES PICAYUNE PUBLISHING CORPORATION and Susan Finch v. The BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Dr. William L. Jenkins as President of the Louisiana State University System and Secretary of the Board of Supervisors, the State of Louisiana Through the Division of Administration and William J. Kling, Jr., Acting State Risk Director and Deputy Undersecretary of the Division of Administration.

No. 2003-C-1589.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Board of Supervisory et al.; Jenkins, William L. Dr. President; Kling, William J. Jr.;—Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court *1045Div. H, No. 497-116; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 2551.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., recused.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20487]



[[Page 59314]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393), the 
Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory 
Committee will conduct a business meeting, which is open to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South 
Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Gochnour, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (208) 392-6681 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#47232028242f2928323507213469212223693234"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4024272f23282e2f35320026336e2625246e3533">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review and 
approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Suzanne C. Rainville,
Deputy Forest Supervisor, Boise National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-20487 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
23.1**
  **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-101297 ) and the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 originally filed on Form S-1 (No. 333-112727)
of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc. of our report dated M arch 14,
2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Form 10-K
filed on March 15, 2005.
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
  Florham
Park, New Jersey
 March 14,
2005
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**FERMAVIR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31,2007**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I am the ChiefExecutive Officer of FermaVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Florida corporation (the“Company”).  I am delivering thiscertificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarterended January 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form10-QSB/A”).

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| May 25, 2007 | /s/ Geoffrey W. Henson  |   |
|--------------|-------------------------|--------|
|         | Geoffrey W. Henson,     |
|         | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered October 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00455-CR

CHLOE A. MENAGER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00143-X

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of the Anders brief filed by counsel. Although the brief references 

that the case proceeded to trial on appellant’s guilty plea to the jury, the brief does not discuss 

voir dire and why no arguable issues can be raised from voir dire. The brief also asserts that 

because the plea was to a jury, issues of article 26.13 of the code of criminal procedure are “not 

germane” to appellant’s trial or any potential appeal. However, the admonishments required by 

article 26.13 apply to guilty pleas, regardless of whether there is a plea agreement, and regardless 

of whether the plea is to the court or a jury. See VanNortrick v. State, 227 S.W.3d 706, 708 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (citing Anderson v. State, 182 S.W.3d 914, 917–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006)); Burnett v. State, 88 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Therefore, we conclude 

the brief filed by counsel does not comply with the requirements of Anders v. California. 
Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s October 7, 2014 motion to extend time to file the 

brief. We STRIKE the Anders brief filed on October 12, 2014. We DENY as moot the motion 

to withdraw as counsel filed with the brief.

We ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either a 

brief raising issues on the merits or an amended Anders brief that addresses the issues identified 

above and all remaining portions of the proceedings not previously addressed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Niles 

Illich and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.15
 
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, James A. McCrea, P. Geo and report, Technical Report on the Berenguela Property, Peru dated October 26, 2005 (the “Report”), and the information contained in my Report, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 7th day of March, 2013.
 
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 
 /s/ James A. McCrea
 James A. McCrea, P. Geo
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10205 and # 10206] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 09/24/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Rita.                     

*Incident Period:*                         09/23/2005 and continuing.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/27/2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/23/2005.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/26/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to : Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana , dated 09/24/2005 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Parishes: 

Acadia, Iberia, Lafayette, Saint Mary. 

Contiguous Parishes: 

Louisiana: Assumption, Iberville, Saint Landry, Saint Martin, Terrebonne.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

S. George Camp, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-20376 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey R. Steinhilber, certify that:
6. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO InternationalCorporation; 7. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 8. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 9. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
10. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date:August 4, 2004 By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber     Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber Title: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dennis N. Beal, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DENNIS N. BEAL     
| |                        
| | Dennis N. Beal         
| | Chief Financial Officer

September 25, 2003

93
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4800 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the 1-year 

deadline for application for asylum in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2010 

Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, and Ms. WATSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate 

the 1-year deadline for application for asylum in the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Protection 

5 to Victims of Persecution Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 1-YEAR ASYLUM APPLICATION 

7 DEADLINE. 

8 Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)) is amended— 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4800 IH

1 (1) by striking subparagraph (B); 

2 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), 

3 and (E) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respec4 tively; 

5 (3) in subparagraph (B), as redesignated by 

6 paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘subparagraph (D)’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘subparagraph (C)’’; 

8 (4) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated by 

9 paragraph (2)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘subparagraphs (B) and 

11 (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’; 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘either’’; and 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘or extraordinary cir14 cumstances relating to the delay in filing an ap15 plication within the period specified in subpara16 graph (B)’’; and 

17 (5) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by 

18 paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Subparagraphs (A) and 

19 (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘Subparagraph (A)’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS