alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         EarthScope Science and Education Advisory Committee (#16638).                    

*Dates/Time:*                         12:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.—Thursday, October 27, 2005. 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.—Friday October 28, 2005.                    

*Place:*                         EarthScope Facility Office, 1200 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Kaye Shedlock, Program Director, EarthScope Program, Division of Earth Sciences, Room 785, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, (703) 292-4693.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed below.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning support for research, education and outreach in the EarthScope Program.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide advice on EarthScope Program measures of success, education and outreach plans, webpage development and other program issues.                    

Dated: October 4, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20274  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EX-10.28



 Exhibit 10.28 

 
 



 
 2012 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (MIP) 

 

																																	
	 	  	~% Plan	 	 	EBITDA*	 	  	% Indiv.
Target	 	 	FCF	 	  	% Indiv.
Target	 	 	MIP
Total	 	 	Allowable
Discretionary	 	 	Total %
Indiv.
Target	 
		  	 	<90	% 	 				  	 	Ø	  	 	 	Ø	  	  	 	Ø	  	 	 	Ø	  	 	 	20	% 	 	 	20	% 
		  	 	90	% 	 	 	27,600	  	  	 	15	% 	 	 	11,700	  	  	 	15	% 	 	 	30	% 	 	 	20	% 	 	 	50	% 
	 PLAN
	  	 	100	% 	 	 	30,600	  	  	 	30	% 	 	 	13,000	  	  	 	30	% 	 	 	60	% 	 	 	20	% 	 	 	80	% 
		  	 	110	% 	 	 	33,600	  	  	 	40	% 	 	 	14,300	  	  	 	40	% 	 	 	80	% 	 	 	20	% 	 	 	100	% 
		  	 	120	% 	 	 	36,700	  	  	 	50	% 	 	 	15,600	  	  	 	50	% 	 	 	100	% 	 	 	20	% 	 	 	120	% 

 TERMS 
  

	•	 	 Each participant has a “target” bonus percentage representing the amount of annual salary to be earned as a Management bonus. Percentages
above represent the portion of an individual’s “target” they would earn at the various financial performance levels. 


  

	 	•	 	 # Participants 27 


  

	 	•	 	 MIP payout is 60% of Target@ Plan EBITDA ($30.6mm) and Plan Free Cash Flow ($13.0mm). 



 

	 	•	 	 MIP payout is 100% of Target@ 120% of Plan EBITDA ($36.7mm) and 120% of Plan Cash Flow ($15.6mm). 



 

	•	 	 Discretionary payout is 20% of target; at financial performance levels below plan, the amount of discretionary bonus available and the
individual payments are determined by discretion of the BOD with recommendations from the CEO considered. 


  

	•	 	 EBITDA and FCF Levels shown above include fully funding the bonus payouts at each respective level. 



 

	 	•	 	 The full amount of the MIP will be determined by final audited results and will be paid upon receipt of the audited financial statements.




  

					
	 Confidential
	 	Page 1	 	02.03.2012
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4558 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4558

To clarify the authority of States to regulate private flood insurance 
                               coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2014

    Mr. Ross (for himself and Mr. Murphy of Florida) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the authority of States to regulate private flood insurance 
                               coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Insurance Market Parity and 
Modernization Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF STATES TO REGULATE PRIVATE FLOOD INSURANCE.

    Paragraph (7) of section 102(b) of the Flood Disaster Protection 
Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)(7)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(7) Private flood insurance defined.--In this subsection, 
        the term `private flood insurance' means an insurance policy 
        that--
                    ``(A) provides flood insurance coverage;
                    ``(B) is issued by an insurance company that is--
                            ``(i) licensed, admitted, or otherwise 
                        approved to engage in the business of insurance 
                        in the State or jurisdiction in which the 
                        insured building is located, by the insurance 
                        regulator of that State or jurisdiction; or
                            ``(ii) eligible as a nonadmitted insurer to 
                        provide insurance in the State or jurisdiction 
                        where the property to be insured is located, in 
                        accordance with sections 521 through 527 of the 
                        Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
                        Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 8201-6); and
                    ``(C) is issued by an insurance company that is not 
                otherwise disapproved as a surplus lines insurer by the 
                insurance regulator of the State or jurisdiction where 
                the property to be insured is located''.
                                 <all>
```
FITNESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JTG EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY CO., LLC and Jonathan T. Griffin, Defendants.

No. COA18-313

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4702 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4702

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all taxpayers a 
credit against income tax for up to $1,000 of charitable contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2010

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all taxpayers a 
credit against income tax for up to $1,000 of charitable contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizens' Choice Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.

    (a) General Rule.--Subpart B of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 
1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:

``SEC. 30E. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.

    ``(a) General Rule.--There shall be allowed as a credit against the 
tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the 
charitable contributions (as defined in section 170(c)) made in cash by 
the taxpayer during the taxable year to one or more organizations 
described in section 170(b)(1)(A).
    ``(b) Maximum Credit.--The credit allowed by subsection (a) for any 
taxable year shall not exceed $1,000.
    ``(c) Limitation Based on Liability for Tax.--The credit allowed by 
subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed the excess (if 
any) of--
            ``(1) the regular tax for the taxable year reduced by the 
        sum of the credits allowable under subpart A and the preceding 
        sections of this subpart, over
            ``(2) the tentative minimum tax for the taxable year.
    ``(d) Special Rules.--
            ``(1) Credit in lieu of deduction.--The credit provided by 
        subsection (a) for any charitable contribution shall be in lieu 
        of any deduction otherwise allowable under this chapter for 
        such contribution.
            ``(2) Election to have section not apply.--A taxpayer may 
        elect for any taxable year to have this section not apply.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subpart B of 
part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding 
at the end the following new item:

``Sec. 30E. Credit for charitable contributions.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
nlef_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 


13
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION I, Everett R. Dobson, Chief Executive Officer of American Cellular Corporation (the Company),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, (the Report):  a.
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and thatb.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at December 31, 2004, and the results of the
Companys operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. March 16, 2005
    
    /s/ EVERETT R. DOBSONEverett R. DobsonChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
 60
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7118
EDWARD LEON MULDROW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; MAJOR JOYNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge. (CA-02-3294-22BC-3) Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Leon Muldrow, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Brown v. French , 147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir. 1998). SeeMuldrow v. Eagleton , No. CA-02-3294-22BC-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003; July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.4


 





AMENDMENT TO WARRANTS


 


This AMENDMENT TO WARRANTS
(“Amendment”) is made effective as of April 16, 2013 by and between Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Company”), and GEMINI MASTER FUND, LTD., a Cayman Islands company (“Holder”),
amending those three certain 7-year warrants to purchase Common Stock of the Company issued by the Company to the Holder on or
about April 15, 2011, including (A) a warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.30, (B) a
warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40, and (C) a warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares
of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.60, which warrants have been subject to various amendments since the date of issuance
thereof (as amended, the “Warrants”); capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Warrants.


 


For good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.     
Exercise Price Reduction. The Exercise Price under each of the Warrants is hereby reduced to equal
$0.15 as of the date hereof (subject to further adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Warrants).


 


2.     
Execution. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile
or by email of a digital image format file or portable document format file of this Amendment.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be duly executed effective the date first written
above.


 








	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ J. Kevin Adams
	 	Name:

        Title:
	J. Kevin
    Adams

    CEO


 





	 	HOLDER:
	 	 
	 	GEMINI MASTER FUND, LTD.
	 	By: GEMINI STRATEGIES LLC, INC.,
	 	as investment manager
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Steven Winters
	 	Name:

        Title:
	Steven
    Winters

    Managing Member
STATE v. Derald HAFNER

347P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Derald Dean Hafner, for Hafner, Derald.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of October 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Writ of Error Coram Vobis:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2011





/s/ Edward A. CespedesEdward A. CespedesChief Financial Officer
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


Exhibit 10.3




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

LICENSE AGREEMENT




This Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) dated as of May 21, 2013 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) amends the License Agreement dated as of February 8, 2012 and all amendments thereto (the “License”) by and between As Seen On TV, Inc., a Florida corporation, as assignee of TVGoods, Inc. (“ASTV”) and Kevin Harrington (“Mr. Harrington”). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the same meanings as given to them in the License.

WHEREAS, ASTV and Mr. Harrington are parties to that certain Amendment to Agreement dated as of March 8, 2013 (the “First Amendment”) amending the License in certain respects; and 

WHEREAS, ASTV and Mr. Harrington desire to further amend the License,

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.

The First Amendment is deleted in its entirety.

2.

The defined term “TVG” is hereby replaced with “ASTV” wherever it appears in the License.

3.

Section 2 of the License is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“2.

GRANT OF LICENSE. Mr. Harrington hereby grants to ASTV, its successors, assigns and sub-licensees an exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide license (with the right to grant sublicenses) to publish, reproduce or otherwise use, separately or together, the Licensed Property, including, without limitation, any such materials that may serve as trademarks or service marks, or in which Mr. Harrington may hold copyrights, in connection with any commercial purpose. For the avoidance of doubt, Mr. Harrington shall continue to exercise all ownership rights over the Licensed Property, except for the right to further license or otherwise transfer the Licensed Property.”

4.

Section 3 of the License is hereby amended to insert the following after the word “employee” in the third line thereof: “or service provider”.

5.

Section 10 of the License is hereby deleted in its entirety.

6.

This Second Amendment is effective as of the Amendment Effective Date. Except as amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the License remain in full force and effect. Any conflict between the provisions of this Second Amendment and the License shall be resolved in favor of the provisions of this Second Amendment.  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Amendment.

		
	AS SEEN ON TV, INC.

	 

	


By   /s/ Ronald C. Pruett, Jr.

	


   /s/ Kevin Harrington


	Name: Ronald C. Pruett, Jr.

Title: Chief Executive Officer

	KEVIN HARRINGTON












Page 1 of 1
# C_2023094EN.01003202.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — De Capitani v Council

(Case T-163/21) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning an ongoing legislative procedure - Council working groups - Documents concerning a legislative proposal to amend Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings - Partial refusal to grant access - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)

(2023/C 94/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Emilio De Capitani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer, and S. Gallagher, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Bauerschmidt and K. Pavlaki, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, L. Van den Broeck and M. Jacobs, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman, M.H.S. Gijzen and J. Langer, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SGS 21/000067 of the Council of the European Union of 14 January 2021, by which the Council refused him access to certain documents, coded ‘WK’, exchanged within the Council working groups in the context of legislative procedure 2016/0107 (COD), concerning the amendment of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ 2013 L 182, p. 19).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision SGS 21/000067 of the Council of the European Union of 14 January 2021; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision SGS 21/000067 of the Council of the European Union of 14 January 2021;

| 2. | Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Emilio De Capitani; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Emilio De Capitani;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. OMAR REAVES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 275 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.