alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. George Lee NOBLES

No. 34PA14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Nobles, George Lee.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*816***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of August 2018 by State of NC to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 20th of August 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GreenPoint Credit, LLC


We have examined management's assertion about GreenPoint Credit, LLC's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
                                 -----------------------------------------------
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included in the
-------
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for GreenPoint
Credit, LLC's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about GreenPoint Credit, LLC's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on GreenPoint Credit LLC's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that GreenPoint Credit, LLC complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all materials respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

January 18, 2000
<PAGE>   1


(11)   STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS





V-TWIN HOLDINGS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       TWELVE MONTHS       TWELVE MONTHS
                                                       ENDED JUNE 30,      ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                            2000               1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>                <C>
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

SHARES OUTSTANDING ...................................    4,127,833          3,600,000
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING ..................    3,830,556          3,000,033
NET LOSS .............................................  $(1,276,077)       $  (213,113)
TOTAL NET LOSS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' ....  $(1,276,077)       $  (213,113)
                                                        ===========        ===========

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE:
LOSS PER SHARE .......................................  $     (0.33)       $     (0.07)
                                                        ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINICIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Julia A. Fratianne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Julia A. Fratianne
-------------------------------------
Julia A. Fratianne, Treasurer and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       17
Exhibit 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Nandan M. Nilekani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Managing Director of Infosys Technologies Limited, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the annual report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 7, 2005



/s/ Nandan M. NilekaniNandan M. NilekaniChief Executive Officer, President andManaging Director




-5-



---

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, T.V. Mohandas Pai, Chief Financial Officer and Head-Finance and Administration of Infosys Technologies Limited, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the annual report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 7, 2005



/s/ T.V. Mohandas PaiT.V. Mohandas PaiChief Financial Officer andHeadFinance and Administration




-6-
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30325 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERALD BURRELL, also known as Gerald Floyd, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-116-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges,
PER CURIAM: * Gerald Burrell appeals his conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that the district court erred by departing upwardly based on his criminal history, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(a)(1), p.s., and that the district court erred by denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Regardless whether the district court relied in part on criminal episodes that should not have been considered, at least one episode that did not result in a conviction was properlyNo. 06-30325 -2- considered in the upward departure decision. Nothing in the record suggests that the district court would have imposed anything less than the maximum sentence allowed by the sentencing range that resulted from its conservative method of determining an appropriate range. See Williams v. United States , 503 U.S. 193, 203 (1992). The decision to depart upwardly was not an abuse of discretion, see United States v. Simkanin , 420 F.3d 397, 416 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1911 (2006), and the resulting sentence was reasonable. See United States v. Smith , 417 F.3d 483, 490 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 713 (2005). Burrell engaged in criminal conduct while on pretrial release. The district court did not err by denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. See United
States v. Hooten , 942 F.2d 878, 883 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Darnell SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM, Employer, and North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

No. COA17-1329

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

MODIFIED. AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Paul DELAIR, Defendant.

No. COA18-124

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

NO ERROR.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4603 

To reauthorize chapter 40 of title 28, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2014 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize chapter 40 of title 28, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Counsel 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHAPTER 40 OF TITLE 28, 

7 UNITED STATES CODE. 

8 Section 599 of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘This chapter shall cease to be effec10 tive five years after the date of the enactment of the Inde11 pendent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘This chapter shall have effect during the period beVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:17 May 14, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4603.IH H4603

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4603 IH

1 ginning on the date of the enactment of the Independent 

2 Counsel Reauthorization Act of 2014 and ending on the 

3 day 5 years after such date’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1



Romacorp, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries



Set forth below is a list of the Registrant's subsidiaries as of March 24, 2002.



|Name of Subsidiary              |  | Jurisdiction ofOrganization
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                                |  |                            
|Roma Bar Management Corporation |  | Texas                      
|Roma Franchise Corporation      |  | Delaware                   
|Roma Systems, Inc.              |  | Delaware                   
|Roma Dining, LP                 |  | Delaware                   
|Roma Holdings, Inc.             |  | Delaware                   
|Costillias Dominicana S.A.      |  | Dominican Republic         
|Roma Prince George's, Inc.      |  | Maryland                   
|Roma Owings Mills, Inc.         |  | Maryland                   
|Roma Sahara, Inc.               |  | Nevada                     
|Roma Huntington Beach, Inc.     |  | Delaware
#### STATE ex rel. Carlos Ray ARMSTRONG v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2183.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Armstrong, Carlos Ray;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial Dis-triet Court Div. B, No. 42,935; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36515NCH.

Denied.
Exhibit 10.2

MUTUAL RELEASE AND TERMINATION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 5th day of April, 2001.

BETWEEN:

CHARTWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., having an office at Suite 700, 407 - 2nd Ave., S.W., in the City of Calgary, Alberta

(hereinafter referred to as "Chartwell")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

REWARD ENTERPRISES, INC., having an office at Unit 35, 12880 Railway Avenue, in the City of Richmond, British Columbia

(hereinafter referred to as "Reward")

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

A.		Chartwell and Reward entered into a Software Licence Agreement as of June 15, 1999 (the "Agreement") respecting the licencing of Chartwell's Internet gaming and back-office administration software and Web site development for the development of Reward's proposed on-line gaming site;



B.		Chartwell and Reward wish to terminate the Agreement and release one another from any further obligations thereunder.



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises, the sum of $1.00 paid by each party to the other, and of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do covenant and agree with one another as follows:



1.		Chartwell and Reward hereby terminate the Agreement and agree that as and from the date hereof the Agreement is void and of no effect.



---





2.		Chartwell hereby, releases and forever discharges Reward and its directors, officers and employees and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of and from any and all duties and obligations under, pursuant to or associated with the Agreement.



3.		Reward hereby, releases and forever discharges Chartwell and its directors, officers and employees and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of and from any and all duties and obligations under, pursuant to or associated with the Agreement.



4.		Chartwell acknowledges that there are not now nor will there be future moneys or liabilities due by Reward under the Agreement or as a result of any oral or written documents or agreements relating to the Agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

CHARTWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Per:

Signature
D.H. Parken	President

REWARD ENTERPRISES, INC.

Per:

Signature
Brian C. Doutaz	President
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4584 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and extend the 

new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicles credit and to enable 

such credit to be converted to a rebate at the point of sale. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2014 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. OWENS, and Mr. HUFFMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

and extend the new qualified plug-in electric drive motor 

vehicles credit and to enable such credit to be converted 

to a rebate at the point of sale. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electric Credit Access 

5 Ready at Sale Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘Electric CARS Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4584 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF NEW QUALI2 FIED PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHI3 CLES CREDIT. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN MAXIMUM CREDIT.—Paragraph (3) 

5 of section 30D(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500’’. 

7 (b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of section 30D of 

8 such Code is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

10 vehicles sold after December 31, 2020.’’. 

11 (c) CREDIT MAY BE ASSIGNED TO SELLER.—Sub12 section (f) of section 30D of such Code is amended by 

13 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(8) CREDIT MAY BE ASSIGNED TO SELLER.— 

15 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The credit which 

16 would (but for this paragraph) be allowed with 

17 respect to a vehicle under subsection (a) for any 

18 taxable year to any person (hereafter in this 

19 paragraph referred to as the ‘initial tax20 payer’)— 

21 ‘‘(i) if assigned by the initial taxpayer 

22 to the person who sold such vehicle to the 

23 initial taxpayer, may be taken into account 

24 by such person, and 

25 ‘‘(ii) shall not be taken into account 

26 by the initial taxpayer. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4584 IH

1 Any person to whom such credit is assigned 

2 under clause (i) shall be treated for purposes of 

3 this title as the taxpayer that placed such vehi4 cle in service. 

5 ‘‘(B) DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.—Sub6 paragraph (A) shall not apply with respect to 

7 any vehicle unless the person to whom the cred8 it is assigned clearly discloses in writing to the 

9 initial taxpayer the amount of the credit allow10 able under subsection (a) with respect to such 

11 vehicle (determined without regard to sub12 section (c)).’’. 

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), the amendments made by this section 

16 shall apply to vehicles acquired after the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 (2) SUBSECTION (c).—The amendment made 

19 by subsection (c) shall apply to vehicles acquired 

20 more than 60 days after the date of the enactment 

21 of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT  99.14
 
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo and reports, Technical Report on the Diablillos Property – Salta and Catamarca Provinces, Argentina dated effective July 27, 2009 and Technical Report – San Agustin Resource Estimate dated effective March 30, 2009 (the “Reports”), and the information contained in my Reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 15th day of March, 2013.
 
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 
 /s/ Dr. Giles Arseneau
 Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo
 
   
  CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 
 
 We hereby consent to the use of and reference to our name, Tetra Tech WEI Inc. and reports, Technical Report on the Diablillos Property – Salta and Catamarca Provinces, Argentina dated effective July 27, 2009 and Technical Report – San Agustin Resource Estimate dated effective March 30, 2009, (the “Reports”) and the information contained in our Reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 15th day of March, 2013.
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 Tetra Tech WEI Inc.
 
 
 
 Per: /s/ Tetra Tech WEI Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4980-N-38]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: October 7, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-19889 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M