alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF**

**NITRO PETROLEUM INCORPORATED**

I, Larry Wise, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nitro Petroleum Incorporated (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at July 31, 2009, and the results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended July 31, 2009. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  September 18, 2009 |   | /s/Larry Wise                         |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Larry Wise                            |
|                      |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |                                  |
/d£/typed/.£ 

### JW dJQrk FILED IN 1STCOURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON TEXAS MAR 2 6 2015 .^HHISTOPHEB A. PRINE 

### i\ Jmd//Afc Jtd fik /va/k/?&?/'&*/Ja owJ^o^svJ//7/HnS 

## 4uJ- Xdau/J/b^ Pau FB£ m£jn. of&/ah/Jwrn M^utI^m %

Send mm/film //o &d J-foe ^^&?M&iJ Jfa 7fcMs£ftf4 

### #ur Askjkftie. kffiis Matter h farmiahd.49

^ ^ ^ S 

### ^§ ^ 4-

"5>

4> or m m ifl o (M W o o
##### 



Exhibit-12
 EXHIBIT 12.1  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST / LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Amounts in thousands except ratio amounts)
 Year ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings before fixed charges:Income before allocation of minority interest
and income from investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries (1)
    
    $
    178,368
    
    
    $
    228,128
    
    
    $
    156,179
    
    
    $
    154,263
    
    
    $
    152,004Add:
    
    Interest expense
    
    
    115,328
    
    
    
    115,255
    
    
    
    103,164
    
    
    
    103,915
    
    
    
    97,228Depreciation expense on capd interest
    
    
    4,437
    
    
    
    3,829
    
    
    
    3,442
    
    
    
    3,140
    
    
    
    2,944Amortization of deferred
financing costs
    
    
    4,256
    
    
    
    4,359
    
    
    
    3,863
    
    
    
    3,638
    
    
    
    3,579Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    302,389
    
    
    $
    351,571
    
    
    $
    266,648
    
    
    $
    264,956
    
    
    $
    255,755Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    115,328
    
    
    $
    115,255
    
    
    $
    103,164
    
    
    $
    103,915
    
    
    $
    97,228Amortization of deferred financing charges
    
    
    4,256
    
    
    
    4,359
    
    
    
    3,863
    
    
    
    3,979
    
    
    
    4,015Capitalized interest
    
    
    30,837
    
    
    
    17,748
    
    
    
    13,242
    
    
    
    10,947
    
    
    
    16,498Fixed charges
    
    
    150,421
    
    
    
    137,362
    
    
    
    120,269
    
    
    
    118,841
    
    
    
    117,741Preferred share distributions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    7,242Preferred unit distributions
    
    
    13,691
    
    
    
    12,095
    
    
    
    11,844
    
    
    
    12,416
    
    
    
    11,619Combined fixed charges
    
    $
    164,112
    
    
    $
    149,457
    
    
    $
    132,113
    
    
    $
    131,257
    
    
    $
    136,602Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.01
    
    
    
    2.56
    
    
    
    2.22
    
    
    
    2.23
    
    
    
    2.17Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    
    
    1.84
    
    
    
    2.35
    
    
    
    2.02
    
    
    
    2.02
    
    
    
    1.87
 
 (1)
    
    Amounts for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2005, 2003 and 2002 have been
reclassified to present properties that have been sold during 2006. As a result, operations
have been reclassified to discontinued operations from continuing operations for all
periods presented.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mark
      L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StrikeForce Technologies,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*/s/
      Mark L. Kay*


*Mark
      L. Kay*


*Chief
      Executive Officer*




*November
      13, 2007*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4820 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis 

of sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2010 

Mr. NADLER of New York (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination 

on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair and Inclusive 

5 Housing Rights Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ACT AND RE7 LATED PROVISIONS. 

8 (a) HOUSING SALE AND RENTAL, RESIDENTIAL

9 REAL ESTATE-RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND BROKER10 AGE SERVICES.— 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4820 IH

1 (1) Section 804 of the Fair Housing Act (42 

2 U.S.C. 3604) is amended by inserting ‘‘sexual ori3 entation, gender identity,’’ after ‘‘sex,’’ each place it 

4 appears. 

5 (2) Section 805 of the Fair Housing Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 3605) is amended by inserting ‘‘sexual ori7 entation, gender identity,’’ after ‘‘sex,’’ each place it 

8 appears. 

9 (3) Section 806 of the Fair Housing Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 3606) is amended by inserting ‘‘sexual ori11 entation, gender identity,’’ after ‘‘sex,’’. 

12 (b) PREVENTION OF INTIMIDATION.—Section 901 of 

13 the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) is amended 

14 by inserting ‘‘sexual orientation, gender identity,’’ after 

15 ‘‘sex,’’ each place it appears. 

16 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 802 of the Fair Housing 

17 Act (42 U.S.C. 3602) is amended by adding at the end 

18 the following: 

19 ‘‘(p) ‘Gender identity’ means the gender-related 

20 identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gen21 der-related characteristics of an individual, with or 

22 without regard to the individual’s designated sex at 

23 birth. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4820 IH

1 ‘‘(q) ‘Sexual orientation’ means homosexuality, 

2 heterosexuality, or bisexuality.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. Noui PHACHOUMPHONE

65PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

William D. Spence, Attorney at Law, for Phachoumphone, Noui.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*806The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of December 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### STATE ex rel. Sam PATE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Pate, Sam;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 369-373; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002 K 838.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C.,*94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Milton Thompson, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 885]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered August 15, 1997, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Control Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Environmental Control Corp. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 16, 2010 |                                            |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                            |
|                   | /s/ Albert E. Hickman                           |
|                   | Albert E. Hickman                               |
|                   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
|                   | Environmental Control Corp.                     |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4721 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4721

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
                unique ZIP Code for Flanders, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2010

    Mr. Bishop of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
                unique ZIP Code for Flanders, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR FLANDERS, NEW YORK.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 
unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only Flanders, New 
York.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6238

ERNEST SIDNEY JONES, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT ZIMMERMAN; LIEUTENANT KNOWLES; E. S.

KITCHEN, JR., Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-968-2)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Sidney Jones, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Brodnax Haskins, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's* order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate

judge. Jones v. Zimmerman, No. CA-95-968-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 16,

1997). Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JK/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTA CONCEPCION ORTIZCANAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70606

Agency No. A095-289-325

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Marta Concepcion Ortiz-Canas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for protection under the

FILED

FEB 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JK/Research 2 08-70606

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Silaya v.

Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for

review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

although the record evidence indicates that widespread gang violence exists in El

Salvador, Ortiz-Canas failed to establish that it is more likely than not that she

would be tortured by the government or with the government’s acquiescence. See

id. at 1073.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
S TEPHEN A. HENDERSON, JR. , Appellant,

v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 2 67 0

_____________________________/ Opinion filed April 18, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. Stephen A. Henderson, Jr., pro se, Appellant. W. Bard Brockman of Bryan Cave LLP, Atlanta GA , for Appellee

.

KELSEY, J. Appellant raises multiple issues in this case involving foreclosure on his late mother’s reverse mortgage. We affirm on all issues except one, that one being the award of attorney s ’ fees, as to which we reverse and remand for further proceedi ngs.2 Appellee’s representative testified at the bench trial that the amount of attorney s’ fees reflected in a proposed final judgment

— $8,976.70

— was accurate according to Appellee’s records. The proposed final judgment was not entered into evidence at the t rial

. Shortly before the bench trial, a n attorney with Appellee’s law
firm executed an “Affidavit as to Time, Effort, and Costs,” stating a total of $13,753.50 in fees were due for the representation, based on a blend of flat

- rate and hourly fees. The affi davit was filed with the trial court before trial, and thus appears in the appellate record, but was never admitted into evidence or even mentioned at the trial; and neither the affiant nor any other representative of the law firm , nor any expert, testifie d at the trial. On these facts, Appellee may be entitled to attorneys ’ fees, but it first mu st adduce additional competent and substantial evidence in support of the fees claimed.
M ortgage foreclosure plaintiffs seeking attorneys ’ fees must support their claim with competent, substantial evidence of the number of hours worked and evidence that those hours and hourly rate s are reasonable

. Absent a stipulation or waiver, the party seeking fees should present testimony from the lawyer who performed the servic es or an authorized representative of the law firm, and an expert as to reasonableness of the rates and fees. Diwakar v. Montecito Palm Beach Condo. Ass’n, Inc. , 143 So. 3d 958, 960

- 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). If the record reflects some evidence supporting th e fee award, but not testimony from the3 lawyer or law firm or an expert, the proper remedy is to remand for further proceedings. Id. ; see also Colson v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B. , 183 So. 3d 1038,
1040

- 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (remanding for evidentiary hearing where record included fee and cost affidavits filed with the trial court but not admitted into evidence at trial) (citing Wagner v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 143 So. 3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ). Accordingly, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for the trial court to take additional evidence on attorneys ’ fees.

ROWE and JAY, J J ., CONCUR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dexter Leon SURRATT

No. 203P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Drew Nelson, Attorney at Law, for Surratt, Dexter Leon.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 5th of July 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of July 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Mission West  Properties,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
Carl E. Berg,  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Wayne N. Pham,  Vice  President  of Finance and  Controller  of the Company,
hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


-------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
March 11, 2005



-------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
March 11, 2005


This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.