alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS



The
undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certify that the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350(c).



Dated: March 30, 2004



/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL SHAVON BRADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00057

- CR

Appeal from

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1230024D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 22, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

129435 & ( 14) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

TAMMERIA K. GHENT, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC 129435 

v CoA 261795

 WCAC 04-0321 

COUNTY OF MIDLAND, SELF-INSURED, 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND 

DUAL EMPLOYMENT PROVISIONS,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal to facilitate redemption 

proceedings is considered and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISED without 

costs and without prejudice to reinstatement on the motion of a party in the event 

redemption proceedings fail to resolve the case. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 22, 2005 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            PLY GEM HOLDINGS, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee D.
Meyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

 Date: May 16, 2005

                                                    /s/ Lee D. Meyer
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                        LEE D. MEYER
                                          PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 21.1

                      Romacorp, Inc.
                   List of Subsidiaries




    Set forth below is a list of the Registrant's subsidiaries as of
      March 26, 2000:


                                          Jurisdiction of
        Name of Subsidiary                 Organization
        ------------------------           ------------
        Roma Ribs, Ltd.                       Canada
        Roma Systems, Inc.                    Delaware
        Roma Dining LP                        Delaware
        Roma Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
        Roma Huntington Beach, Inc.           Delaware
        Roma Bar Management Corporation       Texas
        Roma Fort Worth, Inc.                 Texas
        Roma Franchise Corporation            Delaware
        Roma Owings Mills, Inc.               Maryland
        Roma Prince George's, Inc.            Maryland
        Costillias Dominicana S.A.            Dominican Republic
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jo D. HONEYCUTT.

No. 2002-KO-2635.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Honeycutt, Jo D.;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Red River, 39th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 88751; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36,-215-KA

Denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick. Gil, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 607]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered September 22, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Roman, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*590The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the statement made by the defendant before he was given the *Miranda*warnings was spontaneous and not the product of police interrogation or its functional equivalent *(see, People v Winfield,*267 AD2d 486; *People v Georgiou,*236 AD2d 623; *People v Hylton,*198 AD2d 301; *People v Garcia,*190 AD2d 749; *Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6646

STEPHEN ARTEMUS CHRISTIAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICK JACKSON, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon,

Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-808-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 2, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., THE LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM,

JR., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Artemus Christian seeks to appeal the magistrate

judge’s order dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000).*

 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Christian has not made a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<Page>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Netherlands Car BV

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form F-3 (No. 333-13160) of DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corporation
and the registration statements of Form S-8 (Nos. 333-5074, 333-7082, 333-8998,
333-86934 and 333-86936) of DaimlerChrysler AG of our report dated May 22, 2002
with respect to the balance sheet of Netherlands Car BV as of December 31, 2002,
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual
report on Form 20-F/A of DaimlerChrysler AG.

                                                                   Ernst & Young

September 25, 2002
Eindhoven, the Netherlands
GREATER HARVEST GLOBAL MINISTRIES, INC. v. BLACKWELL HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC.

No. 219P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Nichole M. Hatcher, Attorney at Law, for Greater Harvest Global Ministries, Inc.

Steven C. Lawrence, Attorney at Law, for Blackwell Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 10th of July 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of July 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. George W. BALDWIN

No. 47P02-18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2018

George W. Baldwin, for Baldwin, George W.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th of December 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review *445the order of the Superior Court, Alamance County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of December 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2018

Jay H. Ferguson, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorneys at Law, Durham, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by Social Scientists for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

*366"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Mack, Also Known as William Glover, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 851]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg and Renee White, JJ., at pleas; Renee White, J., at sentence), both rendered on or about May 12, 1999, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is *364granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Appointment of Members to the Legal Division Performance Review 
Board

    Under the authority granted to me as General Counsel of the 
Department of the Treasury, including the authority conferred by 31 
U.S.C. 301 and Treasury Department Order No. 101-5 (revised), and 
pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I hereby appoint the 
following individuals to the General Counsel Panel of the Legal 
Division Performance Review Board for Fiscal Year 2005:

James W. Carroll, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, who shall serve as 
Chairperson;
Thomas M. McGivern, Assistant to the General Counsel (Legislation & 
Litigation);
Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs);
Kenneth R. Schmalzbach, Assistant General Counsel (General Law and 
Ethics);
Roberta K. McInerney, Assistant General Counsel (Banking and Finance);
Marilyn L. Muench, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (International 
Affairs);
Peter A. Bieger, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Banking and 
Finance);
Daniel P. Shaver, Chief Counsel, United States Mint;
Robert M. Tobiassen, Chief Counsel, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 
Bureau;
Sean M. Thornton, Chief Counsel, Office of Foreign Assets Control;
Brian L. Ferrell, Chief Counsel, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network;
Michael J. Davidson, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Engraving & Printing; and
Margaret V. Marquette, Chief Counsel, Financial Management Service.

    Dated: October 6, 2005.
Arnold I. Havens,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-20476 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-37-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLAY MARSHALL CURTIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-21, CA-97-191-R) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Clay Marshall Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Curtis , Nos. CR-93-21; CA-97-191-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:                 August 16, 2010



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CALVIN LEE WEATHERSPOON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2603

[ May 27, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Karen Miller , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 502008CF017526AXX

.

Calvin Lee Weatherspoon, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, K LINGENSM ITH

, and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered January 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00456-CR

JOHN ARLON MILLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-25128-K

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal.

On December 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On January 8, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, together 

with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the 

December 11, 2012 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the January 8, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as 

of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.01****Pharma Services Intermediate Holding Corp.****Certification Pursuant To****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma ServicesIntermediate Holding Corp. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005,filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis B. Gillings,Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, to my knowledge, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ Dennis B. Gillings       Dennis B. Gillings *Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*Date  November 14, 2005This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,whether made before or after the date of this Report,irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)


Maximum Per Diem Rates for Florida and Ohio

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice of Per Diem Bulletin 06-2, revised continental United 
States (CONUS) per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is making a 
technical correction to the lodging rates of certain locations in the 
States of Florida and Ohio. The per diems prescribed in Bulletin 06-2 
may be found at www.gsa.gov/perdiem.

DATES: This notice is effective [enter date of publication in the 
Federal Register] and applies to travel performed on or after October 
1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact 
Lois Mandell, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Travel Management 
Policy, at (202) 501-2824. Please cite FTR Per Diem Bulletin 06-2.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    After an analysis of the per diem rates established for FY 2006 
(see the Federal Register notices at 70 FR 52100, September 1, 2005), a 
technical correction is being made to the per diem rates in the 
following locations:
    State of Florida
    <bullet> Brevard County
    State of Ohio
    <bullet> Cuyahoga County

B. Procedures

    Per diem rates and the FTR Per Diem Bulletin are published on the 
Internet at www.gsa.gov/perdiem. A Federal Notice is published in the 
Federal Register on a periodic basis. This process ensures timely 
increases or decreases in per diem rates established by GSA for Federal 
employees on official travel within CONUS. Notices published 
periodically in the Federal Register, such as this one, now constitute 
the only notification of revisions in CONUS per diem rates to agencies.

    Dated: October 5, 2005.
Rebecca Rhodes,
Deputy Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-20374 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-S