alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32








SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION








Each of the undersigned, Yongke Xue, President and Chief Executive Officer of SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and Spring Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Yongke Xue


Name: Yongke Xue


Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:   March 31, 2011





/s/ Spring Liu


Name: Spring Liu


Title:   Chief Financial Officer


Date:   March 31, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. WORLD FAMOUS, INC. d/b/a World Famous BHS, Inc., and d/b/a World Famous BHS, Ink, Defendant.

No. COA17-1274

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 176

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Emma Charlotte Pieper, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20220084

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable M. Jason McCarthy , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam.

Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Vanessa Sigette , under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, N orth D akota , for plaintiff an d appell ee ; submitted on brief.

Challis D. Williams, Grand Forks, N orth D akota , for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.1 State v. Pieper No. 20220084

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Emma Pieper appeals from an amended criminal judgment after
enter ing a conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence and driving under suspension

. O n appeal, she argues that the law enforcement officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspic ion to justify the stop of her vehicle , thus violatin g the Fourth Amendment and the North Dakota Constitution. We conclude the officer ’s observations were sufficient to raise a reasonable and articulable suspicion justify ing the traffic stop

. Kappel v. Dir ., N.D. Dep’t of Transp. , 1999 ND 213, ¶¶ 9

- 12, 602 N.W.2d 718 (An officer may have reasonable and articulable suspicion after observing “ ‘ a series of acts, each of them perhaps innocent in itself, but which taken together warranted further investigation.’ ” ). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
#### Gregory D. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-1890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Robert L. Bogen of Law Offices of Robert L. Bogen, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the denial of his motion to dismiss the information charging him with vehicular homicide. In his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of *395Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), appellant claimed that there were no material disputed issues of fact. His view of the evidence was that the state could only prove that he was driving approximately 95-105 miles per hour down 1-75 in Broward County when the accident occurred, which was insufficient to constitute reckless driving to support the charge of vehicular homicide. While a witness had seen appellant weaving through traffic, that witness observed this conduct over three miles from the accident scene, thus failing to establish that the weaving was a proximate cause of the accident. The state filed a traverse, stating that appellant’s speed exceeded 110 miles per hour, and denying that the witness who observed appellant weaving was several miles away from the accident, as that estimate by appellant’s counsel was based in part on appellant’s speed. Because the state traversed the motion with specificity and presented additional facts in the motion that created a material issue of fact, the motion was properly denied. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(d); *Boler v. State,*678 So.2d 319, 323 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782), the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-22211), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282), the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592) of Liberty Property Trust and
Liberty Property Limited Partnership and in the related Prospectus of
our report dated February 5, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania				/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0526]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Industry: Fast Track 
Drug Development Programs--Designation, Development, and Application 
Review

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry: Fast Track 
Drug Development Programs--Designation, Development, and Application 
Review'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 7, 2005 (70 
FR 33177), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0389. 
The approval expires on August 31, 2008. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: October 3, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20305 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
STATE of North Carolina v. James Daren SISK

No. COA18-211

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

NO PLAIN ERROR.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
               Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006

                                          /S/           GARY L. CLARK
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                                        Gary L. Clark
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23







                       Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 of WFS Financial 1998-C Owner Trust of our
report dated January 26, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1998.


                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



New York, New York
March 29, 1999
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



/s/ Michael S. Egan
-----------------------
Michael S. Egan
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-1094

_____________________________

LEVON EARLY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

September 29, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Levon Early, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Gonzalez, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 360]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), rendered April 3, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court improperly charged the jury concerning accessorial liability because the charge did not include express language as to the “mere presence” of a defendant at a crime scene. However, the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review as he did not object to it when afforded an opportunity to do so after the jury charge. In any event, as the jury charge otherwise adequately conveyed the proper standard concerning accessorial liability, the failure to include the requested language was not reversible error *(see, People v Slacks,*90 NY2d 850; *People v Brown,*249 AD2d 320; *People v Maldonado,*127 AD2d 855).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Ronald H. Miller,Chief Executive Officer of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc.and will be retained by Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Ronald H. Miller    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Ronald  H. Miller        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | November  7, 2008        |

 

----
Garreth Benjamin FRADY, Plaintiff, v. Vicki Cagle FRADY, Defendant.

No. COA18-141

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 16, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
In the MATTER OF David R. DUBOSE, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000013 Opinion No. 27812

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted June 1, 2018 Filed June 13, 2018

*760John S. Nichols, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

David R. DuBose, of Richmond, Virginia, pro se.

PER CURIAM:

This attorney disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the reciprocal disciplinary provisions of Rule 29 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules.

Respondent was admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia in June 2002 and in South Carolina in November 2007. On June 9, 2015, Respondent was suspended from the practice of law by the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board for fifteen (15) days with certain terms imposed on his suspension. Respondent was discipline because of misconduct involving several instances of failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing clients, failing to keep clients reasonably informed, and withdrawing from the representation of a client without informing the client. *In re DuBose* , VSB Docket No. 15-032-101878, 2015 WL 3945399 (Va.St.Disp. June 9, 2015). Respondent complied with the terms of his suspension, and the matter was concluded.

Respondent did not notify the Commission on Lawyer Conduct within fifteen (15) days of his suspension as required by Rule 29(a), RLDE. Respondent notified the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) of his suspension on December 15, 2017, and ODC notified the Court of Respondent's suspension on January 4, 2018.

As required by the provisions of Rule 29(b), the Clerk of Court provided Respondent thirty (30) days in which to assert a reason that identical discipline should not be imposed in this state. Respondent filed a return stating he would not claim that identical discipline was unwarranted.

The Court finds that reciprocal discipline is appropriate and hereby suspends Respondent from the practice of law in South Carolina for fifteen (15) days from the date of this opinion.

Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, Respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE.

**DEFINITE SUSPENSION.**

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*Date:March
      30, 2007*






*/s/
                Edward A. Cespedes**Edward
                A. Cespedes**Chief
                Financial Officer*
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Wildon Productions  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  October 16, 2006


/s/ Vladimir Barinov
-------------------------
Vladimir Barinov, Secretary
Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Robert L. GOWDY.

No. 84S00-0303-DI-114.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Aug. 13, 2003.

ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE

Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for approval a Statement of Cireumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline stipulating a proposed discipline and agreed facts as summarized below:

Facts: On September 283, 2002, the respondent was charged with possession of cocaine as a Class D felony. On December 3, 2002, the respondent pled guilty to the charge and was sentenced to 545 days imprisonment, all suspended upon 865 days probation. This Court suspended the respondent pendente lite on May 23, 2008.

Violation: The respondent violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(b), which prohibit an attorney from committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.

Discipline: One (1) year suspension from the practice of law, effective May 28, 2008, without automatic reinstatement thereafter.

The Court, having considered the submission of the parties, now APPROVES and ORDERS the agreed discipline. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the parties and in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Disc.R. 28, Section 8(d).

All Justices concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 473 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 473

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend eligibility under 
 the new markets tax credit for community development entities created 
   or organized in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
      Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2009

  Ms. Bordallo (for herself, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
  Pierluisi, and Mr. Sablan) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend eligibility under 
 the new markets tax credit for community development entities created 
   or organized in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
      Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY UNDER NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT FOR COMMUNITY 
              DEVELOPMENT ENTITIES CREATED OR ORGANIZED IN AMERICAN 
              SAMOA, THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, 
              GUAM, PUERTO RICO, AND THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 45D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified community development entity) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rule relating to certain jurisdictions.--A 
        corporation or partnership created or organized in, or under 
        the laws of, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
        Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands shall 
        be treated as a domestic corporation or partnership for 
        purposes of paragraph (1).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to investments made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```