alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLIE PATTERSON TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-99-99)

Submitted: July 30, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Patterson Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,

Richard Barton Campbell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles P. Taylor appeals from the district court’s orders

denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Taylor, No. CR-99-99 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2001; Jan. 22, 2002); see

United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644, 649 (4th Cir. 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Neil Wayne HOYLE

No. 239A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Hoyle, Neil Wayne.

Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 4th of September 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Accordingly, the new brief of the Defendant shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
EXHIBIT 32



                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.


Dated:    February 20, 2007                RIDGEWOOD ENERGY K FUND, LLC

                               By:     /s/ ROBERT E. SWANSON
                                     Name: Robert E. Swanson
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:    February 20, 2007
                               By:     /s/ KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
                                     Name: Kathleen P. McSherry
                                    Title: Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy K Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel ZAA1 HH (53)--R13 Conference Grant 
Applications
    Date: October 4, 2005.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Fishers Building, 5635 
Fishers Lane, 3146, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 443-
2369, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5c9c2d0cbdfc0d7c4e5c8c4ccc98bcbcccd8bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a262d3f24302f382b0a272b232664242322642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 16, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20239 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the MATTER OF Jarrett Skipper CALDER, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001670

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 29, 2018

ORDER

Respondent has submitted a Motion to Resign in Lieu of Discipline pursuant to Rule 35 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules. In light of Respondent's serious misconduct which demonstrates an unfitness to practice law, we grant the Motion to Resign in Lieu of Discipline. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 35, RLDE, Respondent "acknowledges that disciplinary counsel can prove" the allegations of misconduct. Moreover, Rule 35 provides Respondent's resignation shall be *permanent* , and he will never be eligible to apply, and will not be considered, for admission or reinstatement to the practice *919of law or for any limited practice of law in South Carolina.

Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, and shall also surrender his Certificate of Admission to Practice Law to the Clerk of Court.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty* C.J.

*/s/ John W. Kittredge* J.

*/s/ Kaye G. Hearn* J.

*/s/ John Cannon Few* J.

*/s/ George C. James, Jr.* J.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41106 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN MANUEL ESPARZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08

- CR

- 40

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Manuel Esparza, federal prisoner # 67544

- 079, appeals the denial of a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) of the 17

- year prison sentence imposed for his guilty plea convictions of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute , and possessing with intent to distribute , more than five kilograms of cocaine. He argues that t he district court erred by construing h is pro se letter seeking appointment of counsel as a § 3582(c)(2) motion and denying him

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 12, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41106 Document: 00513833399 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2017No. 15

- 41106

2 a reduction without written reason s and without considering the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) or his post

- sentencing rehabilitation and training. We review the district court ’ s interpretation of the guidel ines and sentencing statutes de novo. United States v. Carter , 595 F.3d 575, 577 (5th Cir. 2010). Esparza was not eli gible for a reduction because his sentence was
not “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). Rather, the district court sentenced Esparza to 17 years of imprisonment based on his binding agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). See Freeman v. United States , 564 U.S. 522, 534

- 40 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring); United States v. Benitez , 822 F.3d 807, 809

- 12 (5th Cir. 2016)

. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction

. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2111; United States v. Gonzalez

- Balderas , 10 5 F.3d 981, 984 (5th Cir. 1997). To the extent that Esparza challenges the district court’s denial of his request for appointment of counsel, a § 3582(c)( 2) movant has no such right, United States v. Whitebird , 55 F.3d 1007, 1010

- 11 (5th Cir. 1995), and the interests of justice did not warrant a discretionary appointment given his statutory ineligibility for a sentence reduction. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41106 Document: 00513833399 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/12/2017
<page>					  EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             420                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      202                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,807                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,755                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,857                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,007                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,109)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,755                       0
<SALES>                                              0                     202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                     202
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                 378,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0               (378,793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0               (378,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0               (378,793)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 4, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00341

- CV

BEXAR COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

, Appellant

v.

Carmella s

Carmella GUERRERO

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 08758

Honorabl e Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to December 4, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Clarkson F. Brown

Bexar Cty District Atty Civil Section

300 Dolorosa, Suite 5049

San Antonio, TX 78205 Robert William Clore

Clor e Appeals and Litigations Support

15481 South Padre Island Dr.

Suite 101

Corpus Christi, TX 78418
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00185

- CV
Jessica Gryseels v. Marina Vista Condominium Council of Co

- Owners Association

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Montgomery County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 16

- 08

- 09604

- CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRT EENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudg ed against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 11, 2018
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mack-CaliRealty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) for the year ended December 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Mitchell E. Hersh, as President and Chief Executive Officer ofMack-Cali Realty Corporation, its general partner, and Barry Lefkowitz, asChief Financial Officer of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, its general partner,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theOperating Partnership.

 
| Date:   February 11, 2009  | By:    |   /s/ Mitchell E. Hersh                                |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |   |   Mitchell E.  Hersh                                   |
|                                           |   |   President  and Chief Executive Officer               |
|                                           |   |    of  Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                           |   |    the  general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |
|                                           |   |                                                             |
|                                           |   |                                                             |
| Date:   February 11,  2009 | By:    |   /s/ Barry  Lefkowitz                                 |
|                                           |   |   Barry  Lefkowitz                                     |
|                                           |   |   Executive  Vice President and                        |
|                                           |   |    Chief  Financial Officer                       |
|                                           |   |    of  Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                           |   |    the  general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |

 

Thiscertification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed filed by the Operating Partnership for purposesof §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the OperatingPartnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6437

RAYMOND FRANK CHAPPELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE DEEDS, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-98-817-AM)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Frank Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

February 22, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on February 24, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Frank Chappell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Chappell’s motion for a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

Chappell v. Deeds, No. CA-98-817-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1999).* We

grant Chappell’s motion to amend his informal brief and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,036
<INVENTORY>                                    121,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               253,530
<PP&E>                                         105,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,033
<BONDS>                                        176,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,141
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,468)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,584
<SALES>                                        540,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               540,427
<CGS>                                          409,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   571
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,157)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (131.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (131.03)

</TABLE>