alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than October 18, 2005.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1.  Aaron G. Buerge*, Springfield, Missouri and Justin B. Buerge, Joplin, Missouri, individually and as co-trustees of the Buerge Family Trust, to retain control of Financial Enterprises, Inc., and thereby control shares of First National Bank of Clinton, both of Clinton, Missouri.                 

*2.  Marvin J. Carter and Donald C. Stamps*, both of Lawton, Oklahoma, trustees of the 2000 Green Family Trust, to acquire B.O.E. Bancshares, Inc., and thereby control shares of Liberty National Bank, both of Lawton, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 28, 2005.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-19783 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of Nathan 

Levi Lavender and Candice Marie 

Lavender and In the Interest of H.L.L., 

J.G.L., and I.K.L., Children

No. 06-22-00070-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

21D0251-CCL). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Rambin, Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

We further order that the appellee, Nathan Levi Lavender, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 10, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:              August              9, 2007                                                    |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| /s/ Charles              E. Jenkins                                                                |   |   |   |
| Charles                E. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer (Principal                Financial Officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                    |   |   |   |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 31, 2020

No. 04-19-00245-CR

Vanessa CAMERON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR4286C

The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed an “Objection to the Clerk’s Record and Motion to Abate Appeal in 

Order to Supplement Clerk’s Record.” In the motion, appellant asserts that the clerk’s record 

does not contain all the sealed motions filed by her trial counsel and ruled on by the trial court, 

including a motion seeking funds for the retainer and travel of an expert witness the denial of 

which she represents will be an issue on appeal. Appellant asks this court to abate the appeal and 

instruct the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine whether the missing motions and

related orders are lost or destroyed, and if so, whether they may be replaced by agreement of the 

parties or with an accurate copy or duplicate. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e). The State did not file 

a response opposing the motion. The appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this 

order, and the trial court is ORDERED to conduct a hearing and make written findings of fact 

determining whether: (1) any sealed motions and related orders have been lost or destroyed, (2)

the missing pleadings are necessary to the appeal’s resolution, and if so, (3) whether the lost or 

destroyed pleadings can be replaced by agreement of the parties or with an accurate copy of the 

missing pleading(s). See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e).

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

trial court’s written findings and any previously omitted sealed motions and related orders in this 

court within thirty days from the date of this order. The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file the

supplemental clerk’s record under seal in this court.
_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William H. Roj, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: August 10, 2005 By: /s/ William H. Roj           Name: William H. Roj    Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald H. Miller, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Aventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

/s/  Ronald H.Miller         

Ronald H. Miller

Chief Executive Officer

August10, 2006

 

----
**Exhibit 31.3**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Bernard G. Dvorak, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Liberty MediaInternational, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
              a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
              b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
              c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
              a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
              b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004     /s/ Bernard G. Dvorak      Bernard G. Dvorak   Senior Vice President and Controller
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

Pursuant to Section 9355, Title 10, United States Code, the U.S. Air Force Academy Board of Visitors will meet at the Rayburn Building in Washington, DC, February 11, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the morale and discipline, curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, academic methods, and other matters relating to the Academy.

A portion of the meeting will be open to the public while other portions will be closed to the public to discuss matters listed in Paragraphs (2), (6), and Subparagraph (9)(B) of Subsection (c) of Section 552b, Title 5, United States Code. The determination to close certain sessions is based on the consideration that portions of the briefings and discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Board of Visitors or the Academy; involve information of a personal nature, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; or involve discussions of information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to frustrate implementation of future agency action. Meeting sessions will be held in room 2212 of the Rayburn Building, Washington, DC.

For further information, contact Lieutenant Colonel Paul Price, Chief, USAFA & Accessions Activities Division, Directorate of Learning and Force Development, Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, AF/DPLA, 1040 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC, 20330-1040, (703) 695-9855.

Albert Bodnar,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-2045 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4192 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4192

To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to regulate the height of buildings 
 in the District of Columbia'' to clarify the rules of the District of 
Columbia regarding human occupancy of penthouses above the top story of 
            the building upon which the penthouse is placed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2014

 Mr. Issa (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to regulate the height of buildings 
 in the District of Columbia'' to clarify the rules of the District of 
Columbia regarding human occupancy of penthouses above the top story of 
            the building upon which the penthouse is placed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF RULES APPLYING TO HUMAN OCCUPANCY OF 
              PENTHOUSES IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BUILDINGS.

    (a) Permitting Human Occupancy of Penthouses Within Certain Height 
Limit.--The eighth paragraph of section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
to regulate the height of buildings in the District of Columbia'', 
approved June 1, 1910 (sec. 6-601.05(h), D.C. Official Code) is amended 
by striking ``and no floor or compartment thereof shall be constructed 
or used for human occupancy above the top story of the building upon 
which such structures are placed'' and inserting ``and, except in the 
case of a penthouse which is erected to a height of one story of 20 
feet or less above the level of the roof, no floor or compartment 
thereof shall be constructed or used for human occupancy above the top 
story of the building upon which such structures are placed''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Andrew D. Berke, Respondent, v Robert I. Hamby et al., Appellants.

[718 NYS2d 887]

In an action, *inter alia,*for an accounting, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated September 23, 1999, which denied their motion to strike the plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated December 17, 1999, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see, Berke v Hamby,*279 AD2d 491 [decided herewith]). Accordingly, the appeal from the order dated September 23, 1999, which denied the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs demand for a jury trial, is dismissed as academic. Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of WPT Enterprises, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W.
Todd Steele, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ W. Todd SteeleW. Todd SteeleChief Financial Officer
----

Action brought on 14 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-70/05)

(2005/C 82/46)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Denis Martin, of its Legal Service.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 2 December 2003.

----

(1)OJ L 303 of 2 December 2000, p. 16.

----