alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Shakita Necole WALTON

311PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 4, 2019

Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, for Walton, Shakita Necole.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Heather Haney, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of February 2019 by Appellate Defender to Allow Counsel to be Withdrawn and for Appellate Defender to Assign Additional Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of February 2019."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6696
JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:03-cv-000250-SGW) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying Turner’s motion to reconsider a previous order dismissing this action for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. United States Dep’t of Justice , No. 7:03-cv000250-SGW (W.D. Va. April 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0096 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HARLAN GERALD VASKA,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until June 21 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 15 2023

05/15/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0096
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4766 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Ms. WATERS, Mrs. MALONEY, and Mr. CAPUANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at 

Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Pro5 tecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION. 

7 Section 704 of the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure 

8 Act of 2009 (12 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 

9 42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**FERMAVIRPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**FORM10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2006**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I am the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of FermaVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”).  I am delivering this certificate inconnection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended July 31,2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-QSB”).

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| September 19, 2006 | /s/ Geoffrey W. Henson  |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|               | Geoffrey W. Henson,     |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4712 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4712

    To include the county of Mohave, in the State of Arizona, as an 
    affected area for purposes of making claims under the Radiation 
  Exposure Compensation Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear 
                                testing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2010

Mr. Franks of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To include the county of Mohave, in the State of Arizona, as an 
    affected area for purposes of making claims under the Radiation 
  Exposure Compensation Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear 
                                testing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.

    Section 4(b)(1)(C) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended by inserting ``Mohave,'' after 
``Apache,''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2005-9-26) [Docket OST-2004-17171]. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding MAXjet Airways, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail. 

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than October 14, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Dockets OST-2004-17171 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room PL-401), 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vanessa R. Balgobin, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721. 

Dated: September 30, 2005. 

William. Bertram, 

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-20332 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                              |                                             |                                            |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                              | WILSHIRE              BANCORP,              INC. |
|                         |                                        |                                       |
| Date:              August 9, 2006 | By:                                    | /s/ Soo              Bong              Min |
|                              | Soo              Bong Min                        |
|                              | Chief              Executive Officer             |

|                                |                                   |                                                |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 9, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Brian                E.                Cho |
|                                | Brian                E. Cho            |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
#### Kathleen K. McGoldrick, Appellant, v 2100 Park Associates, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[718 NYS2d 823]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered April 12, 1999, which granted defendant 2100 Park Associates’ motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*288The determination in the appealed order that plaintiffs action was time-barred, was not made in violation of the law of the case doctrine. Defendant 2100 Park Associates’ original motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds, *inter alia,*that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations was denied on the procedural ground that defendant’s counsel failed to appear for oral argument, and not on the merits. Defendant promptly moved again for the same relief, but the court failed to address that portion of the motion that sought dismissal of the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Defendant’s third motion for the same relief sought a ruling of the still pending issue, and the presently appealed order, entered April 12, 1999, constituted the first resolution on the merits of defendant’s Statute of Limitations defense. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 10.1

	
 
    
	
Revenue
    	
 
    
	
Stamp
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
(Stock Application Facility)
    


 

Memorandum of Amendment

 

Date  May 20, 2013

 

To: Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ

	
 
    	
Our   company (borrower)
    
	
 
    	
Address
    	
Central   Building 8F
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Kayobashi   1-1-5, Chuo-Ku
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Tokyo   104-0031 Japan
    
	
 
    	
Name
    	
Calgon   Carbon Japan KK
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Natsuo Watase, President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Third   Party Mortgagor 400 Calgon Carbon Drive
    
	
 
    	
Address
    	
Pittsburgh,   PA 15205 USA
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Calgon   Carbon Corporation
    
	
 
    	
Name
    	
/s/   Stevan R. Schott, Senior Vice
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President    & Chief Financial Officer
    


 

This company and third party mortgagor confirm that as of the agreement date of this memorandum, the items defined in the agreement of overdraft (exclusive account) (including subsequent amendments to the agreement. hereinafter “Original Agreement B”) dated March 31, 2010, and Special Agreement dated March 31, 2012 (including subsequent amendments to the agreement. hereinafter “Original Special Agreement”) provided to Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ (hereinafter your bank”), will be amended to the following. The terms used in this memorandum have the same meaning as the terms as defined in the original Agreement and/or original Special Agreement. Any items not mentioned in this memorandum will follow the original Agreement and/or Special Agreement.

 

Article 1 (Partial Amendment of Supplementary Provisions of Original Special Agreement) The “conditions” defined separately in the Supplementary Provisions of the original Contract will be amended as follows.

 

	
Original
    	
 
    	
Amended
    
	
(4) The   total book value balance of qualified stock book value and qualified claims   book value of the security provided to your bank will be maintained at an   amount of at least the debt balance based on original Agreement A and   original Agreement B.
    	
 
    	
(4)The   total book value balance of qualified stock book value and qualified claims   book value of the security provided to your bank, less the balance of the   loan on deed defined in the Special Agreement dated March 29, 2012 with   the final day of the previous month as the basis date, will be maintained at   an amount of at least the debt balance based on Original Agreement B.
    


 

End

 

	
 
    	
For   Bank Use
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Seal
    	
 
    	
Handling
    
	
(Document   Code: 59900)
    	
Signature/
    	
 
    	
Verification
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Seal
#### Bernard NAVA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-2597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

Bernard Nava, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Nava challenges the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion which was premised on newly discovered *328evidence. The trial court denied the motion as successive.

Nava’s previous motion did not present the same issue. *Nava v. State,*801 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). *Compare Wright v. State,*- So.2d -, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003). We affirm however because Nava’s motion is legally insufficient. *Jones v. State,*591 So.2d 911, 916 (Fla.1991).

FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of White Mountain Titanium Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2007





*/* *s* */* Michael
      P. Kurtanjek





Michael
      P. Kurtanjek, President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
# Official Journal C 273/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6018 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6018 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 273/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8530 — Brookfield/Engie/FHHGL) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 273/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8530 — Brookfield/Engie/FHHGL) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 273/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2017/C 273/03 | Commission Decision of 16 August 2017 amending Decision 2009/427/EC establishing the expert group for technical advice on organic production | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 273/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2017/C 273/03

Commission Decision of 16 August 2017 amending Decision 2009/427/EC establishing the expert group for technical advice on organic production

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 273/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8592 — Centerbridge/EGPH/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 273/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8592 — Centerbridge/EGPH/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4845 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide housing loan benefits for children of members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans who die from service-connected disabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2010 

Mr. CROWLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide housing loan benefits for children of members of the Armed Forces and 

veterans who die from service-connected disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOUSING LOAN BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF 

4 PERSONS WHO DIE FROM SERVICE-CON5 NECTED DISABILITIES. 

6 Section 3701(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new para8 graph: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4845 IH

1 ‘‘(6) The term ‘veteran’ also includes the child 

2 of a person who died from a service-connected dis3 ability.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### James H. SCHULTZ v. Dr. Richard M. HILL, Barbara Stice Hill, Stice-Hill Town & Country Shopping Center Partnership, Dewanna Atkins, J.L. Mallett, Belleview Shopping Center Partnership, Stice-Hill Edgewood Plaza Partnership, and Tioga Oaks Shopping Center General Partnership.

No. 2003-C-1259.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

*1044In re Schultz, James H.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 448,851; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 0835.

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-100053, 333-55080 and 333-69828), the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-31032) and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No.
333-66972) of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2003
relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 26, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4651 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4651

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, as the ``Specialist Keith Erin 
                   Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST KEITH ERIN GRACE, JR. MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, shall be known as the 
``Specialist Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referenced 
to subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```