alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of October 10, 2005: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 2:00 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Nazareth, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 11, 2005 will be: 

Formal orders of private investigations; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

Opinion; and 

Amicus consideration 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: October 3, 2005. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-20182 Filed 10-4-05; 11:27 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
OFFICIAL BUSINESS . &*,**-, tf»aePQ% STATE OF TEXAS -8? ^gSgSgl #/# ^««.«r—•

PENALTY '•"rtLI T |"UR fop £3K0 Bs^^^l^^^^^^ te*fifi?gp2£3 ^^ lessee* p,rNEy bowes

12/18/2014 PRIVATE USE : 8*^ «l&is3S 02 1R - $ 00 2fi« DIGBY, BRUCE ,7 ffc IB1S§1 Sine152 «* 22" 2014

MEBH3B 77701

BRUCE DIGBY

1295 NORTH STAPT #3

BEAUMONT, TX 77701

Abel Acosta, Clerk

UTF

',,,,^Ji,l,',ll"l'»''4lfl,'n'lii»''ilil'-«J»*iiilfi|ilM!||

/
STATE of North Carolina v. Devonte J. WILLIAMS, Defendant.

No. COA18-402

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

NO ERROR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
EARTHWEB INC.
   BALANCE SHEET
   INCOME STATEMENT
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,054                  25,292
<SECURITIES>                                     6,242                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,776                   1,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (665)                    (53)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,554                  26,978
<PP&E>                                           7,272                   2,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,402)                 (1,415)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,189                  30,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,030                   3,559
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            98                      79
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,091                  30,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,189                  30,477
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,050                   3,349
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,968                   2,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,599                  10,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   426                      43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (804)                   (307)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,713)                 (8,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,713)                 (8,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,713)                 (8,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.78)                  (2.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.78)                  (2.37)


</TABLE>
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Kevin HALL and Thierry Tony Thomas, Appellees.

Nos. 3D03-236, 3D03-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 13, 2003.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellees.

Before LEVY, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with *State v. Franklin,*836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Conflict is certified with *Taylor v.*
      *908
      *State,*818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), *review dismissed,*821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

Reversed and remanded.
Order entered January 11, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 00456
- CR
JOHN ARLON MILLER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F10
- 25128
- K


### O RDER
T he Court REINSTATES this appeal. On December 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief had not been filed. On January 8, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, together
with an e xtension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the December 11, 2012 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the January 8, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as
of the date of this order.
/s/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE
#### Robert EY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-537.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 2003.

Robert Ey, Clearwater, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

We affirm the order denying Robert Ey’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Ey has raised an issue in his brief regarding the legality of his sentence for misdemeanor petit theft in circuit court case number 95-19712 which we cannot determine from this record, our affirmance of this case is without prejudice to any right he may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800 regarding that sentence.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ, Concur.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 5, 2012 | By:  /s/ James G. Borem                                   |
|                              | James G. Borem                                                           |
|                              | President and Chief Executive Officerand Interim Chief Financial Officer |
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Compas Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Erilma Desruisseaux, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>United Services Automobile Association, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Oleg Rybak and Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Jeena R. Belil, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered July 30, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the insured vehicle had not been involved in the accident in question.</p><p>In support of its motion, defendant proffered an affidavit by its insured, who averred that she had not struck anyone with her vehicle. The insured's passenger also submitted an affidavit, in which she stated that the insured vehicle had not come into contact with a pedestrian. The affidavits were sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, that "the alleged injur[ies] do[] not arise out of an insured incident" (<i>Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos.</i>, 90 NY2d 195, 199 [1997]; <a href="../2009/2009_52601.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Andromeda Med. Care, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 126</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52601[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]; <a href="../2009/2009_52379.htm" target="_blank"><i>Midwood Med. <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Equip. &amp; Supply, Inc. v USAA Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 25 Misc 3d 139</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52379[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]). Plaintiff opposed defendant's motion with only an affirmation by its counsel, who did not assert that he possessed personal knowledge of the facts. Consequently, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendant's motion (<i>see Zuckerman v City of New York</i>, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><p>ENTER:</p><br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 25, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6707

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE TAYLOR, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C

- Murda , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 21

- 7538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE TAYLOR, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C

- Murda,
Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr - 00009

- 1 )

Submitted : November 28, 2022 Decided: December 12, 2022 USCA4 Appeal: 21-6707 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Christopher Jermaine Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6707 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Christopher Jermaine Taylor appeals the district court’s order s denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion s for compassionate re lease , motion s for reconsideration , and motions for an evidentiary hearing . We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
of discretion in the district court’s denial of compassionate release and reconsideration
based on the court’s conclusion that Taylor failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting his release. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review) , cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Nor do we find any abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Taylor’s motions for an evidentiary hearing. See Richardson v. Kornegay , 3 F.4th 687, 695 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review for denial of evidentiary hearing in federal habeas corpus proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Taylor , No. 3 :15

- cr - 000 09

- 1 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2021 , Aug. 2, 2021, Aug. 30, 2021 , Sept. 16, 2021 & Oct. 15, 2021 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6707 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/12/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
In the MATTER OF: A.P.

No. COA18-280

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
ARROYO v. ZAMORA

301P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Chad T. Diamond, Attorney at Law, for Zamora, Daniel J.

Valerie Arroyo, for Arroyo, Valerie

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of November 2017 by Plaintiff for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STONEWALL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FROSTY PARROTT BURLINGTON, and Frosty Parrott Cary, LLC, Shane Smith and Tom DeWitt, Defendants.

No. COA18-171

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
In the MATTER OF: I.A.B.

No. COA18-40

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

AFFIRMED.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 24, 2007 

Mr. David F. Chappell

Chappell, Hill & Lowrance, L.L.P.

2501 Parkview Drive, Suite 220

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Mr. Kent F. Brooks

Law Office of Kent F. Brooks

8117 Preston Rd., Suite 300

Dallas, TX 75225

RE:Case Number:  05-0427

Court of Appeals Number:  02-03-00116-CV

Trial Court Number:  17-181243-99

Style:FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

SERVICE EMPLOYMENT REDEVELOPMENT

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice Willett not sitting)

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-0427Page 1**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas Manuel, Chief Executive Officer of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: May 10,   2011 | /s/ Thomas Manuel                                               |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Thomas Manuel                                                   |
|                      | Chief Executive   Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Director |

 

----
James H. MCCALL, IV and Shannon McCall, Plaintiffs, v. Ronald Lee MILLION, Jr. and Marissa Hayler Million, Defendants.

No. COA17-403

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ramelle Milek LOFTON

No. 143PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

William D. Spence, Attorney at Law, Kinston, for Lofton, Ramelle Milek.

Allison A. Angell, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 21st of May 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of May 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*807"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      32,013,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,888,551
<PP&E>                                       2,440,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                 920,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,278,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,782,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          261,059
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,201,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,462,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,104,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,633,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,633,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,633,722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2



 

September  9, 2012

 

Gabe Dalporto

Tree.com

 

Dear Gabe,

 

This letter confirms our understanding that in the event your employment with Tree.com, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is terminated by the Company for a reason other than (i) Cause (as defined below) or (ii) unacceptable performance (as such may be determined by the Company in its sole discretion, provided that such performance shall be reasonably documented by the Company), the Company will pay you severance pay in an amount equal to the sum of six (6) months of your annual base salary upon your executing a waiver & release document provided by the Company.  This severance will be paid on regularly scheduled pay dates for six (6) months following the effective date of the waiver & release and will be discontinued should you find other employment.

 

“Cause” shall mean gross negligence in carrying out your duties for the Company or any breach of fiduciary duties to the Company, conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to any felony, any act of fraud or embezzlement, material violation of a Company policy or any unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information or trade secrets of the Company or its affiliates, or failure to cooperate in any Company investigation.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

	
/s/   Claudette Hampton
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Claudette   Hampton
    	
 
    
	
Senior   Vice President, Human Resources & Administration