alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Mission West  Properties,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year ended  December  31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
Carl E. Berg,  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer,  Raymond V.
Marino, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Wayne N. Pham, Vice President
of Finance and Controller of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company for the periods included in the Report.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
----------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2009

/s/ Raymond V. Marino
----------------------------------
Raymond V. Marino
President and Chief Operating Officer
March 13, 2009

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
----------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
March 13, 2009


This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                     - 91 -
CERTIFICATIONS



I, John Shaffer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global-e Investments, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  July 27, 2005



/s/ John Shaffer

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Mission West Properties, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 4. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 5. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

|   | By: /s/ Raymond V. Marino               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond V. Marino                       |
|   | President & Chief Operating Officer |
STATE v. Juan Foronte MCPHAUL

421PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 1, 2018

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for McPhaul, Juan Foronte.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Sara B. Warf, Clinical Assistant Professor of Law.

James B. Gatehouse, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Professor Brandon Garrett, et al.

*857The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of July 2018 to admit Sharon Katz and Matthew R. Brock Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of August 2018."
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Hector Estrada, Isela Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales V.

Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire

Appellate case number : 01

- 14

- 00014

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 01183

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 21, 2015

Party filing motion: A ppelle e s, Lyndon and Daner Cheshire

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown

Date: October 20, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

141040 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141040 

 COA: 296514 

Muskegon CC: 09-057585-FH 

SHARON LOUISE SPROWLS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE v. Douglas W. STANDARD

309P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Douglas Wayne Standard, for Standard, Douglas W.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of September 2018 by Defendant for Change of Venue:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0421

Filed February 11, 2015

MARY VIRGINIA MCMAHON,

Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

DAVID ROUSSELOW, PAMELA S. ROUSSELOW 

a/k/a PAMELA S. ROUSSELOW, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Poweshiek County, Myron L. 

Gookin, Judge.

Mary McMahon appeals the denial of her petition to establish a boundary 

by acquiescence. AFFIRMED.

Andrew B. Howie of Hudson, Mallaney, Shindler & Anderson, P.C., West 

Des Moines, for appellant.

John W. Harris of Law Offices of C. Kevin McCrindle, Waterloo, for 

appellees.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Potterfield, JJ.
2

POTTERFIELD, J.

Mary McMahon appeals the denial of her petition to establish a boundary 

by acquiescence between adjoining properties. Adjoining property owners, 

David and Pamela Rousselow contend the trial court was correct in denying 

McMahon’s petition and in granting their counterclaim to quiet title in the disputed 

land. 

“[T]he party seeking to establish a boundary line other than the boundary 

line in accordance with a survey must prove acquiescence by clear evidence.” 

Tewes v. Pine Lane Farms, Inc., 522 N.W.2d 801, 806 (Iowa 1994). “[A]

boundary line may be established by a showing that the two adjoining 

landowners or their predecessors in title have recognized and acquiesced in a 

boundary line for a period of ten years.” Id. (emphasis added). “Each of the 

adjoining landowners or their grantors must have knowledge of and consented to

the asserted property line as the boundary line.” Id. (emphasis added); Sille v. 

Shaffer, 297 N.W.2d 379, 381 (Iowa 1980).

Upon our de novo review,1 we find no reason to disturb the trial court’s 

rulings. We agree with the trial court’s finding that “[n]either party knew where 

the actual boundary line was located.” Nor was there a consistent, recognized 

property line. As the trial court stated, “Because there was never any mutually 

 

1 A claim for boundary by acquiescence is ordinarily brought “as an action by ordinary 

proceedings.” See Iowa Code § 650.15 (2013). Thus, our review would normally be for 

correction of errors of law. Iowa R. App. P. 6.907. However, the parties tried this matter 

as one in equity, and therefore, our review is de novo. See Sille v. Shaffer, 297 N.W.2d 

379, 381 (Iowa 1980) (“Since this matter was tried by the court in equity it will be so 

considered by us and reviewed de novo.”). “In equity cases, especially when 

considering the credibility of witnesses, the court gives weight to the fact findings of the 

district court, but is not bound by them.” Iowa R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g).
3

recognized boundary between the parties, the issue of whether such boundary 

was mutually recognized for a period of ten years is irrelevant.” We affirm.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mondial Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.





Date:  August 28, 2007





/s/ Joe Alvaro

Joe Alvaro

Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
|  Company Name                                       |   |  Percentage Owned                         |   | State/Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| Pacific Industry Holding Group Co. Ltd.                  |   | 100% by SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc.            |   | Republic of Vanuatu                 |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd.                          |   | 99% by Pacific Industry Holding Group Co. Ltd. |   | People’s Republic of China    |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo Modern Organic Agriculture Co., Ltd. |   | 91.15% by SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd.      |   | People’s Republic of China    |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| Huludao Wonder Fruit Co., Ltd.                           |   | 100% by SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd.        |   | People’s Republic of China    |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| Yingkou Trusty Fruits Co., Ltd.                          |   | 100% by SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd.        |   | People’s Republic of China    |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
|                                                     |   |                                           |   |                                |
| Harmony MN Inc                                           |   | 100% by SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc.            |   | U.S.A                               |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of White Mountain Titanium Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 13, 2011
 /s/ Michael KurtanjekMichael P. Kurtanjek, President  & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 2000 and the
Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,261
<PP&E>                                          69,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,997)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,150
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,001)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (94,249)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               228,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (228,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (228,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (228,659)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### In re Appeal of DISCIPLINARY BOARD DECISION NO. 03-PDB-001.

No. 2003-OB-1762.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Whitelaw, Gloria;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 03-PDB-001.

Leave to appeal denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1654

TYRONE HURT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE AMERICAN COLLEGE DICTIONARY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01704-RDB)

Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint 

pursuant to a prefiling injunction prohibiting him from filing a complaint that does not state 

a cognizable claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Am. Coll. 

Dictionary, No. 1:19-cv-01704-RDB (D. Md. June 11, 2019). We grant Hurt leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and deny his motion to reconsider the order deferring 

action on his IFP application. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Bar Docket No. 09673

#### In the Matter of David W. Stephens, Respondent.

(10 P.3d 765)

Dated this 6th day of September, 2000.

In a letter dated August 21, 2000, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent David W. Stephens, of Garden City, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 246).

On October 31, 1997, the respondent was placed on two years’ supervised probation by this court. *In re Stephens,*263 Kan. 221, 946 P.2d 1379 (1997). On March 6, 1998, the respondent’s supervised probation was revoked by this court. *In re Stephens,*264 Kan. 245, 954 P.2d 1100 (1998). At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a formal complaint had been filed by the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which there were five separate complaints. There were allegations of lack of diligence and failure to communicate with clients. Many of the allegations of misconduct occurred during the time the respondent was on supervised probation.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that David W. Stephens be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of David W. Stephens from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 250).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 24, 2024

No. 04

- 24

- 00129

- CV

Francine Suzette Bakabadio BIYOUDI

, Appellant

v.

Ream Synarel Banhy ZITHA

, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CI16321

Honorable Tina Torres , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed.

It is so ORDERED on April 24, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of April, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
Jonathan E. BRUNSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Office of the 12th Judiciary, Office of the Clerk of Cumberland County, Office of the District Attorney for the 12th Prosecutorial District, Office of the Public Defender of the 12th Defender District, Office of the Cumberland County Sheriff, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, North Carolina Department of Social Services, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, North Carolina Department of Justice, Office of the North Carolina General Assembly, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, and the State of North Carolina, Defendants.

No. COA18-571

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

DISMISSED.