alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, William H. Roj, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: November 1, 2006 By: /s/ William H. Roj       Name: William H. Roj  Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r 137824 (14) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices JEROME DOWE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137824 COA: 286447 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $62.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $313.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2008
Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 November 9, 2007
    
    /s/ Joseph M. Fortunato

Joseph M. FortunatoChief Executive Officer
 69
#### Anna C. Baxter (Spinster), Florence B. Clark, Widow, Marian S. Sprague (Spinster), E. B. Mendsen, Alice M. Folger, Clifford F. Folger, Ethel J. Conrad, Murray Conrad, James S. Capen and Mary B. Capen, His Wife, as Agents for George P. Berkey, *Appellants*v. Frank C. Hoehler, as Plaintiff, and R. T. Peddicord and Evelyn S. Peddicord, His Wife, and The Orlando Bank & Trust Company, a Banking Corporation, Defendants, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 25, 1928.

*Eldridcje Hart,*for Appellants;

*Newell & Boyer,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the above named appellants from certain orders and decrees made in the suit of Frank C. Hoehler, plaintiff, v. R. T. Peddicord and Evelyn S. Peddicord, his wife, and the Orlando Bank & Trust Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, as Trustee, which are identified as follows:

“1. From the final decree of foreclosure in favor of Frank C. Hoehler, Complainant, which decree is dated May 6,1927, and recorded in Chancery Order Book 25, page 820, thereof, Orange County, Florida Public Records.

"2. From the Order of Confirmation of Sale of said Final Decree of Foreclosure, which order is dated June 8th, 1927, and recorded in Chancery Order Book 25, page 513, thereof.

“3. From the Order of Court denying the Petition for *971Rehearing and Motion to set aside the Final Decree oí Foreclosure, which Order is dated June 29th, 1927, and recorded in Chancery Order Book 27, page 134, thereof.”

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders and decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders and decrees; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders and decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. concur.
On appellant’s and respondent’s joint motion for remand filed March 10,

reversed and remanded in part; otherwise affirmed May 1, 2003

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*EDWIN DEAN GUNTER, *Appellant.*

C002014CR; A117297

67 P3d 996

Andrew Chilton and Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Kathleen Cegla, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.

Before Brewer, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*462PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for rape in the first degree. The trial court determined that defendant’s criminal history score was a B based on an Oregon conviction and a California juvenile adjudication. Defendant argues that his correct criminal history score is a C. The state agrees. Pursuant to ORS 138.227(1), the parties jointly move for remand to the trial court for resentencing. We grant the motion and remand.

Defendant’s California juvenile adjudication was for a violation of the California penal code prohibiting lewd acts with a minor. Under the California statute, a person may be convicted for touching any part of the victim. *See People v. Martinez,*11 Cal 4th 434, 903 P2d 1037 (1995). Below, the state argued that sexual abuse in the first degree was similar. However, because sexhal abuse in the first degree requires sexual contact, ORS 163.427(1), and sexual contact is defined as touching a “sexual or other intimate parts,” ORS 163.305(6), the two statutes are not similar. The trial court should not have considered the California juvenile adjudication in determining defendant’s criminal history. *State v. Provencio,*153 Or App 90, 93-94, 955 P2d 774 (1998).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, David W. Carlson, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, of MRI Interventions, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: August 29, 2014 | /s/ David W. Carlson   
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      | David W. Carlson       
|                      | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Ridgewood Energy K
Fund, LLC;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Dated:  February 20, 2007

   /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
 Name:  Robert E. Swanson

Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5245 September Term, 2023

1:23-cv-02522-UNA

Filed On: April 4, 2024

Danilo Augusto Feliciano, also known as

Danil Ezekiel Faust,

Appellant

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the

United States,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas, Rao, and Garcia, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s October 17, 2023 order

dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction be affirmed. As to appellant’s request for a

writ of mandamus, he has not identified any error in the district court’s dismissal for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction because he has failed to show that the Attorney General

has a clear duty to act. See Illinois v. Ferriero, 60 F.4th 704, 715 (D.C. Cir. 2023); see

also Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-32, 838 (1985) (holding that a decision

whether to institute enforcement proceedings is “generally committed to an agency’s

absolute discretion”). As to appellant’s requests for relief under the Administrative

Procedure Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act, appellant has failed to establish his

standing to sue. See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 573-74 (1992) (“[A]

plaintiff raising only a generally available grievance about government – claiming only

harm to his and every citizen’s interest in proper application of the Constitution and

laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the

public at large – does not state an Article III case or controversy.”); see also Lance v.

Coffman, 549 U.S. 437, 442 (2007) (per curiam) (voters’ allegations that state had not

followed the Elections Clause did not amount to particularized injury).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5245 September Term, 2023

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NORMAN H. COHEN, ED.D.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2012-5135

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 07-CV-0154, Chief Judge Emily C. Hewitt.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MATTHEW J. DOWD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, 

DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief

was PAUL M. KIM. 

DAVID M. RUDDY, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, 

Acting Assistant Attorney General, JOHN J. FARGO, Director, and JOHN A. HUDALLA, Attorney.
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 14, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk
IN RE: T.T.E.

238A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2019

Michelle F. Lynch, Attorney at Law, For T.T.E.

Janelle E. Varley, Assistant Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of March 2019 by Juvenile-Appellee to Withdraw as Private Assigned Counsel and to Appoint the Appellate Defender:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of March 2019."
#### A. B. Zetrouer, *Appellant,*v. R. G. Zetrouer, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Opinion Filed May 26, 1928.

*Evans Haile*and *Zach II. Douglass,*Attorneys for Apellant;

*Ilmnpton & Hampton,*Attorneys for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

On October 9th, 1923, appellee filed' his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Alachua County, Florida, praying for a mandatory injunction against appellant requiring him to open certain public roads which he (appellant) had closed by causing fences to be constructed across them. On hearing a temporary mandatory injunction was granted which order was affirmed by this Court in Zetrouer v. Zetrouer, 89 Fla. 253, 103 So. Rep. 625, where the law of the case was fully covered. On final hearing the temporary mandatory injunction was made permanent and this appeal was prosecuted from that order.

The sole question presented to us on this appeal is the suffieiencjr of the evidence to sustain the finding of the chancellor. We have examined the record carefully and while there are many conflicts in the testimony we think it' amply supports the finding of the chancellor and no reason is made to appear why his finding should be re*977versed. Even the testimony of the appellant shows a limited use of the roads in question by the public for more than twenty years; the time necessary to acquire them by prescription.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4840 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 19), 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4840 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CLARENCE D. LUMPKIN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Co4 lumbus, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clar5 ence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS