alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:              August              9, 2007                                        |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                        |   |   |   |
|                                                                                        |   |   |   |
| /s/ Michael              P. Kurtanjek                                                  |   |   |   |
| Michael                P. Kurtanjek, President (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                        |   |   |   |

----
CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the annual report of White Mountain Titanium Corporation
        (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        the undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Date:
        November 13, 2008
 
 */**s/*Michael P. KurtanjekMichael
                  P. Kurtanjek, President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Anthony J.Nocchiero, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Worldwide, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

# 4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  November 13, 2006
|        |   | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Anthony J. Nocchiero     |
|   |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Melissa APPERSON and her husband, Justin Cox, Plaintiffs v. INTRACOASTAL REALTY CORPORATION, Melissa Gallison, individually and as broker in charge of Intracoastal Realty Corporation, Keith Beatty, individually and as an Agent and/or Employee of Intracoastal Realty Corporation, and Ed Coulburn, Individually and as an Agent and/or Employee of Intracoastal Realty Corporation, Kendall Fowler, and his wife, Tabitha Fowler, Defendants

No. COA18-147

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JENNIFER MANN

, Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH CHAISON

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0297

[ January 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; Carolyn Bell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DR008179NB.

Jennifer Mann, Palm Beach Gardens, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Orlando RAY, Appellant.

No. ED 80760.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Aug. 12, 2003.

Mary S. Choi, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Andrea Mazza Follett, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Orlando Ray, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the first degree, three counts of assault in the second degree and three counts of armed criminal action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                             PLY GEM HOLDINGS, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee D.
Meyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

 Date: November 15, 2004


                                                 /s/  Lee D. Meyer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                      Lee D. Meyer
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# Agency Holding Meeting:

National Science Board.

# Date and Time:

October 11, 2005, 3 p.m.-3:45 p.m. (ET). 

# Place:

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Public Meeting Room 220. 

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

 

### Open Session (3 p.m.-3:45 p.m.) 

Discussion of CBS Input to the 2020 Vision for NSF Document. 

*For information contact:*                     Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000,                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Michael P. Crosby,

Executive Officer and NSB Office Director. 

[FR Doc. 05-20159 Filed 10-3-05; 4:06 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Kenneth I. MOCH, Plaintiff, v. A. M. PAPPAS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Art M. Pappas, Ford S. Worthy, Defendants.

No. COA17-1126

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 3, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Harold JOHNSON

No. 174P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert H. Johnson, for Johnson, Robert Harold.

Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of June 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Watauga County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of June 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of June 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
STATE v. Jamal M. WATSON

107P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2018

Ms. Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General

Mr. Daniel F. Read, Attorney at Law, for Watson, Jamal M.

Mr. Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of April 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of April 2018."
2001 OK JUD ETH 2.

#### JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2000-2.

No. 2000-2.

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.

March 30, 2001.

10 QUESTION 1: May a sitting judge or an active retired judge accept a fee/honorarium for delivering a speech?

T1 QUESTION 2; Does it make any difference if the paying group is not an organization pertaining to law, the judiciary or the government?

12 SPECIFIC FACTS: The judge is not a professional speaker, but is called upon occasionally to give speeches.

{3 WE ANSWER: QUESTION 1: YES, with some reservations.

T4 QUESTION 2: NO

T5 Canon 2; "A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all of the Judge's Activities"

T6 Canon 3A: "Judicial Duties in General. The judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge's other activities."

T7 Canon 4A: "Extra-Judicial Activities in General. A judge should conduct all of the judge's extra-judicial activities so that they do not: ...

> 8. interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties."

T8 Canon 4B: "Avocational Activities. A judge may speak, write, lecture, teach and participate in other extra-judicial activities concerning the law, the legal system, the administration of justice and non-legal subjects, subject to the requirements of this Code."

T9 In J.E.A.P. No. 99-4, 70 OBJ 3448, we advised that the Canons allow extra-judicial activities so long as the integrity of the judiciary and of the judge is not compromised and the activity does not interfere with judicial duties. In that decision, the facts indicated the judge was being paid a modest fee and his expenses. We assume the preparation and delivery of the speech does not *268interfere with judicial duties and that the paying organization is not involved with the Courts and not likely to be involved.

¶ 10 The fee should be a "reasonable fee" which is the amount that would ordinarily be paid to a speaker who is not a judge. The organization may also pay and the judge may accept a reasonable amount for travel or other expenses.

¶ 11 A judge may speak on legal or nonlegal subjects. A judge may very well be an expert in other areas and occasionally be in demand for addressing special groups.

¶ 12 In summary, a judge may receive a reasonable fee and reasonable expenses for a public speech.

18 Robert L. Bailey, Chairman, Robert A. Layden, Vice-Chairman, Milton C. Craig, Secretary.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Aaron BRIGGS

No. COA18-22

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
ADAMS CREEK ASSOCIATES v. Melvin DAVIS and Licurtis Reels

No. 3A08-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed September 21, 2018

Armstrong Law Firm, P.A., by L. Lamar Armstrong, Jr., Smithfield and L. Lamar Armstrong, III, for plaintiff-appellee.

Hairston Lane, P.A., by James E. Hairston, Jr., for defendant-appellants.

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen, PLLC, Chapel Hill, by William G. Simpson, Jr. ; and Goldsmith Resolutions, Marion, by Frank Goldsmith, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for findings of fact concerning defendants' ability to comply with the removal of the structures as a condition of the 2011 Contempt Order. In the trial court, defendants also are without prejudice to advance claims not briefed or previously raised but discussed at oral arguments before this Court.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 27, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Walters, Christina Shea

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers *588Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Advocates for Justice

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Paul F. Khoury, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Robert L. Walker, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Madeline J. Cohen, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 21st of December 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of December 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 1st day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Larry Wise, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Nitro Petroleum Incorporated (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007(the Quarterly Report)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

|By:    | /s/ Larry Wise              | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|       |                             | 
|Name:  | Larry Wise                  | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer and | 
|       | Chief Financial Officer     | 
|Date:  | September 18 , 2007         | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
DICKSON, et al v. RUCHO, et al

201PA12-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Phillip J. Strach, Attorney at Law, Michael D. McKnight, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Rucho, Robert et al.

Edwin Speas, Attorney at Law, Caroline P. Mackie, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Anita S. Earls, Attorney at Law, for Dickson, Margaret, et al.

Thomas A. Farr, Attorney at law, Raleigh.

Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General, James Bernier, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina, et al.

Susan K. Nichols, Special Deputy Attorney General.

John W. O'Hale, Guardian ad Litem.

Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, Adam Stein, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Victor Goode, Attorney at Law, John F. Carella, Staff Attorney, for North Carolina State Conference Of Branches Of The NAACP, et al.

Clare Barnett, Attorney at Law.

John A. Bussian, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Press Association, Inc., et al.

Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters, Inc.

Charles E. Coble, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Dorrian H. Horsey, Attorney at Law.

Hugh Stevens, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Open Government Coalition, Inc.

Geraldine Sumter, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Kareem Crayton, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Terry Smith, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for N.C. Legislative Black Caucus.

David Lambeth, for David Lambeth.

Mark A. Finkelstein, Attorney at Law, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Jessica Ring Amunson, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Leah J. Tulin, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Michelle R. Singer, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

H. Jefferson Powell, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Law Professors.

Meghann K. Burke, Attorney at Law, Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Theodore V. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Robert A. Atkins, Attorney at Law, Jaren Janghorbani, Attorney at Law, Farrah R. Berse, Attorney at Law, Pietro Signoracci, Attorney at Law, for Congressional Black Caucus.

Jaclyn Maffetore, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for North Carolina State Conference Of Branches Of The NAACP, et al.

*293The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of May 2018 by Plaintiffs:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. James William DUKES, Defendant.

No. COA18-274

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

NO PLAIN ERROR.