alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                             JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT


This Third Amendment to the Joint Venture Agreement ("Third Amendment") is made
and entered into as of August 9, 2001 by and among Trans Cosmos, Inc., a
Japanese corporation ("TCI"), Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc., a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Washington, U.S.A. ("Primus"), and
Primus Knowledge Solutions KK Japan, a Primus/TCI joint venture company
organized under the laws of Japan as a kabushiki kaisha ("Primus KK").

                                   BACKGROUND

Primus and TCI established Primus KK under a Joint Venture Agreement ("JVA")
dated November 16, 1995. Primus, TCI and Primus KK subsequently amended the
terms and conditions of the JVA on September 25, 1997 (the "First Amendment")
and again on July 17, 2000 (the "Second Amendment").

Primus and TCI now wish to amend the JVA as follows:

                                    AMENDMENT

1. Statutory Auditor. Article 5 of the JVA is amended to provide that Primus KK
   -----------------
shall have one (1) statutory auditor as  mutually agreed by
Primus and TCI in writing and appointed by TCI in compliance with such
agreement.

2. Documentation and Procedures. Primus KK shall ensure that all necessary
   ----------------------------
Japanese governmental approvals and filings have been obtained and that the
proper corporate governance procedures have been followed in order to effectuate
this Third Amendment.

3. Effect of Amendment. All references to the subject matter of Article 5 of the
   -------------------
JVA in the First and Second Amendments shall be construed in a manner consistent
with Section 1 of this Third Amendment. Except as expressly amended by this
Third Amendment, and the First and Second Amendments, all other terms and
conditions of the JVA shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.

4. Governing Language. This Third Amendment is executed in the English language
   ------------------
which version shall control for all purposes.

This Third Amendment shall take effect immediately on the date first set forth
above.

PRIMUS KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS, INC.               TRANS COSMOS, INC.

By: /s/ Michael A. Brochu                      By: /s/ Yasuki Matsumoto

Print: Michael A. Brochu                       Print: Yasuki Matsumoto

Title: President and CEO                       Title: Executive Vice President

PRIMUS KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS KK JAPAN

By: /s/ Masahiro Sasaki

Print: Masahiro Sasaki

Title: CEO & President
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4739 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the limit 

on the amount of certain contributions which may be made to a candidate 

with respect to an election for Federal office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2010 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

reduce the limit on the amount of certain contributions 

which may be made to a candidate with respect to an 

election for Federal office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR 

4 CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDIVIDUAL CAN5 DIDATES. 

6 (a) REDUCTION IN LIMIT.—Section 315(a)(1)(A) of 

7 the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4739 IH

1 441a(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and in2 serting ‘‘$1,000’’. 

3 (b) APPLICATION OF INDEXING.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 315(c)(1)(B) of such 

5 Act (2 U.S.C. 441a(c)(1)(B)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘after 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘after 2002 (or, in the 

7 case of the limitation established under subsection 

8 (a)(1)(A), after 2012)’’. 

9 (2) DETERMINATION OF BASE PERIOD.—Sec10 tion 315(c)(2)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

11 441a(c)(2)(B)) is amended— 

12 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

13 end; 

14 (B) in clause (ii)— 

15 (i) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)(A),’’, and 

16 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

17 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(iii) for purposes of subsection (a)(1)(A), 

21 calendar year 2011.’’. 

22 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

23 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

24 respect to elections occurring after December 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1530

HENRI JEAN

- BAPTISTE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STATE ’ S ATTORNEY ’ S OFFICE OF MARYLAND , Defendants

- Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv - 03009

- PWG )

Submitted : September 20, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Henri Jean

- Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henri Jean

- Baptiste appeals the dis trict court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his civil action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jean

- Bapt ist v. Montgomery Cnty. Dep’t of Corr. , No. 8:17

- cv - 03009

- PWG (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2018) . We deny Jean

- Baptiste’s motion for stay pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
William M. BYRON and Dana T. Byron v. SYNCO PROPERTIES, INC., a North Carolina Corporation, and City of Charlotte, a North Carolina body politic and corporate

No. 127P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Madeline J. Trilling, Attorney at Law, for Byron, William M., et al.

Kenneth T. Davies, Attorney at Law, for Byron, William M., et al.

Thomas E. Powers, III, Assistant City Attorney, for City of Charlotte.

Terrie V. Hagler-Gray, Senior Assistant City Attorney, for City of Charlotte.

Roy H. Michaux, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Synco Properties, Inc.

James E. Scarborough, Attorney at Law, for Byron, William M., et al.

***ORDER***

*200Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of April 2018 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4809 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4809

      To provide greater technical resources to FCC Commissioners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2010

 Mr. McNerney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide greater technical resources to FCC Commissioners.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FCC Commissioners' Technical 
Resource Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL STAFF.

    Section 4(f)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
154(f)(2)) is amended by inserting after the first sentence the 
following new sentence: ``Each commissioner may also appoint an 
electrical engineer or computer scientist to provide the commissioner 
technical consultation when appropriate and to interface with the 
Office of Engineering and Technology, Commission Bureaus, and other 
technical staff of the Commission for additional technical input and 
resources, provided that such engineer or scientist holds an 
undergraduate or graduate degree from an institution of higher 
education in their respective field of expertise.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 17,431.

#### Housing Authority of the City and County of Denver *v.*Cottrell et al.

(279 P. [2d] 1063)

Decided February 14, 1955.

Messrs. Donaldson, Hoffman & Goldstein, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Bowman, Erickson & Bowman, Mr. David J. Clarke, for defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
2001 OK JUD ETH 4.

#### JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2001-4.

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.

March 30, 2001.

10 QUESTION 1: May a judge allow his/her staff (clerk, secretary, bailiff, court reporter) to accept gifts from attorneys on special occasions: Valentine's Day, Secretary's Day, Christmas, etc.

{1 SPECIFIC FACTS: The donor and staff members do not see each other socially; the gifts are inexpensive and only given on special occasions or holidays.

12 WE ANSWER: YES, with reservations.

T3 Canon 2; "A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all of the Judge's Activities"

T4 Canon 2A "A judge should respect and comply with the law and act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary"’

T5 Canon 3C(1): "A judge should diligently discharge the judge's managerial responsibilities ..."

T6 Canon 3C(2): "A judge should require staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to the judge and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in the performance of their official duties."

T7 The Canons do not apply to the staff of a judge but the judge does have *270managerial duties and must require the staff to comply with certain ethical standards. The Canons cited above do not specifically prohibit gifts, etc., but are cited to show the judge's responsibility for the conduct of the staff., As we pointed out in J.E.A.P. Opinion No. 2001-8, a judge may receive certain gifts in reasonable amounts and under certain circumstances and those general rules should apply to the staff. It is impossible to set specific parameters regarding gifts to staff members, the propriety of which can only be determined by consideration of the specific circumstances. The key question is whether the gift is of such a nature that it clearly is for the purpose of gaining certain advantage with members of the judge's staff or has the appearance to an observer that the purpose of the gift is to gain particular advantage. The value of the gift, the occasion or cireum-stances of the gift, the relationship of the donor to the Court system and the apparent purpose of the gift are all legitimate concerns for the judge.

T8 In summary, the Code of Judicial Conduct does not apply to the judge's staff; the staff may receive gifts from people connected with the Court system and from others, but the judge has a duty under the Canons to require that the staff comply with ethical standards and the staff members must exercise caution and good judgment in receiving gifts.

T 9 Robert L. Bailey, Chairman

Robert A. Layden, Vice-Chairman

Milton C. Craig, Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 45

  To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and health 
care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

Mrs. Bachmann introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
  Education and the Workforce, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, Natural 
Resources, Rules, House Administration, Appropriations, and the Budget, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and health 
care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA AND HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE 
              HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) PPACA.--Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), such Act (other than 
subsection (d) of section 1899A of the Social Security Act, as added 
and amended by sections 3403 and 10320 of such Act) is repealed, and 
the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act (other than such 
subsection (d)) are restored or revived as if such Act had not been 
enacted.
    (b) Health Care-Related Provisions in the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010.--Effective as of the enactment of the 
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act are repealed, and 
the provisions of law amended or repealed by such title or subtitle, 
respectively, are restored or revived as if such title and subtitle had 
not been enacted.

SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to 
the vote on passage of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Denia Enterprises Inc.  (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Norman Dority, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Norman Dority

------------------------------

Norman Dority

Chief Financial Officer

November 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing
General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))] for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 22, 2006



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
Denise GUIDOTTI v. Donald Mac MOORE, Sr.

No. 402P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Denise Guidotti, for Guidotti, Denise.

Alan I. Maynard, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, for Moore, Donald Mac (Sr.).

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of November 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of November 2018 by Plaintiff to Amend the Petition:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of White Mountain Titanium Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2007








*/* *s/* Charles
      E. Jenkins





Charles
      E. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing
General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))] for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: | May 22, 2006
|----- | ------------



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant