alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                GreenPoint Manufactured Housing Contract Trust
                           Pass Through Certificates
                                 Series 1999-6
                   January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999



                                             Class A-1         Class A-2
                                           -------------     -------------
1999 Distribution Allocable to Principal      817,389.66              0.00
1999 Distributions Allocable to Interest      433,285.42        651,311.11
12/31/99 Remaining Principal Balance       69,182,610.34     70,000,000.00

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number and aggregate remaining principal balance of Contracts with payments delinquent:
           <S>                           <C>               <C>
           Days Delinquent               Number            Aggregate Remaining Principal Balance
           ---------------               ------            -------------------------------------
               31 - 59                     15                                618,441.90
               60 - 89                      3                                107,416.66
              90 or more                    0                                      0.00
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                                    <C>
Aggregate amount of servicing fees and expenses payable out of the trust for 1999:                     116,666.67

The number of contracts that were repurchased or replaced during 1999                                           0

1999 Aggregate Principal Balance of All Contracts repossessed or foreclosed upon                             0.00

The balance in the Reserve Account as of 12/31/99                                                            0.00

1999 Cumulative Realized Losses                                                                              0.00

The amount of any outstanding Monthly Advance Amount as of 12/31/99                                    180,151.64

1999 amounts deposited to Reserve Account                                                                    0.00

The pool scheduled principal balance, expressed as a percentage                                        99.4161502%
     of the Cut-Off Date pool principal balance

The number of Manufactured Homes Currently held by the Servicer due to Repossessions                            0
    and the aggregate principal balance of the related defaulted Contracts                                   0.00

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Phillip BUTLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2058.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Butler, Phillip;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 40,908; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36510-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
#### Michael HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2744.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Michael Hill, Bonifay, Pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Hall v. State,*823 So.2d 757 (Fla.2002).

THOMPSON, PLEUS and TORPY, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0306-14

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v.

DAVID VILLARREAL, Appellee

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

AFTER OPINION ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam. MEYERS, J., filed a concurring opinion. RICHARDSON, J., filed a

concurring opinion. NEWELL, J., filed a concurring opinion. KEASLER, J., filed a

dissenting opinion in which HERVEY, J., joined. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion

in which KELLER, P.J., joined.

O P I N I O N

Having granted the State’s motion for rehearing in this case, and having considered

its merits, we now conclude that the State’s motion was improvidently granted. We deny the

State’s motion for rehearing. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

Delivered: December 16, 2015
Villarreal - 2

Publish
STATE v. Juan Carlos RODRIGUEZ

302A14-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Barbara S. Blackman, Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellate Defenders, John F. Carella, Staff Attorney, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jennifer Martin, Patrick B. Weede, Michael Silver, Assistant District Attorneys, Mary Carla Babb, Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney Generals, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of August 2017 by State of NC to Strike Supplemental Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
#### Ian M. FERGUSON, a Minor by His Parents and Natural Guardians, Elizabeth J. Ferguson and Michael Ferguson and Elizabeth Ferguson and Michael Ferguson, In Their Own Right, Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund and Pennsylvania Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 18, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2003, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice LAMB did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Stephen R. Kerrigan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which the statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 7, 2007    /s/ Stephen R. Kerrigan Stephen R. Kerrigan
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Achievers  Magazine  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
       respects, the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
       Company.


Date:  June 14, 2007


/s/ Arto Tavukciyan
---------------------------------------
Arto Tavukciyan, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GR ANT HEW ITT B ALDER REE, Pe titioner - Appe lla nt, v. JEFFREY B EAR

D, * R

e sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-56619

D.C . No. 3:11-c v-02782-LAB M EM O R ANDUM * *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Larry A. B urns, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

b e r 23, 2014 *** B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HRISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Grant He witt B a lde rre e a p pe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt de ny ing his 28 U.S.C . § 2254 ha be a s pe tition. W e have 

# F IL ED SEP 30 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* Pursua

nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 43(c )(2), Je ffre y B e ard is substitute d for his pre de c e ssor, M atthe w C ate , a s Se c re ta ry of the De pa rtm e nt of C orre c t ions a

nd R e ha bilita tion. ** This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 2253. W e re vie w a distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of a ha be a s c orpus pe t ition denovo, se eStanle y v . C ulle n , 633 F.3d 852, 859 (9th C ir. 2011), a nd we a ffirm . B a lde rre e c onte nds tha

t his trial c ounse l wa s ine ffe c tive for fa iling to c om m unic ate with him . The sta te c ourt c onc lude d tha

t this c la im

la c ke d m e rit be c a use B a lde rre e did not show a re a sona ble proba bility of a diffe re nt outc om e a bse nt thea lle ge d de fic ie nc y of tria l c ounse l . The sta

te c ourt’ s re

je c tion of this c la im wa s not c ontra

ry to, or a n unre a sona

ble a pplic ation of, Stric k

land v . W ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984), nor ba s e d on a n unre a sona

ble de t e rm i nat ion of fa c t s in light of the

e vide nc e pre se nte d. Se e 28 U.S.C . § 2254(d). M o re ove r, be c a use any ne w e vide nc e c ould not bec onside re d in fe de ra l ha be a s proc e e dings, the d istric t c o urt prope rly a d judic ate d B a lde rre e ’ s c la im without c onduc ting a

n e vide ntia ry he a ring. Se eGulbrandson v. Ry an , 738 F.3d 976, 993-94 & n.6 (9th C ir. 2013), c e rt. de nie d, 134 S. C t. 2823 (2014). W e c onstrue B a lde rre e ’ s a dditional a rgum e nts a s a

m otion to e xpa

nd the c e rtific ate of a

ppe a la bility . So c onstrue d, the m otion is denie d. Se e9th C i r. R . 22- 1(e ); Hiiv ala v . W

ood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th C ir. 1999) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 6 6 1 9 2
STATE of North Carolina v. Carl COMBS

No. COA18-69

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

VACATED.
H. R. 4120 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to extend the termination 

date. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ACT TERMINATION DATE EXTENDED. 

Section 4(f) of the National Law Enforcement Museum Act 

(Public Law 106–492) is amended by striking ‘‘13 years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘16 years’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The provisions of this Act shall take effect as if this Act were 

enacted on November 8, 2013. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lindsey Lee ROBINSON, Jr.

No. COA18-74

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 16, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
Thorsten BLUMENSCHEIN, Plaintiff, v. Nicole BLUMENSCHEIN, Defendant.

No. COA17-1299

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
STATE v. James H. TERRELL, Jr.

55A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 19, 2018

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, James Howard Terrell, Jr., Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Terrell, James Howard (Jr.).

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *99The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of October 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of October 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Opinion issued November 14, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 13 - 00 798 - CV

——————————— YVETTE R. MARSH - JOHNSON AND CLEOTHA ETIENNE , Appellant s V. HORACE MANN LIFE INS URANCE COMPANY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012 - 46804
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Yvette R. Marsh

- Johnson and Cleotha Etienne , have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
Exhibit 23






                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Regency Realty Corporation:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-72899) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-63723) on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P.,
of our report dated February 28, 1999,  relating to the balance sheets of RRC FL
Five,  Inc. as of  December  31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related  statements  of
operations,  stockholder's  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 1998,  which report appears in the December
31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of RRC FL Five, Inc.




                                                 KPMG LLP



Jacksonville, Florida
March 12, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                               0001066849
<NAME>                                      SITE2SHOP.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              450,157
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,589,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          22,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,124,380
<PP&E>                                            1,390,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (454,209)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,173,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,620,041
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             12,480
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,243,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,173,892
<SALES>                                          10,015,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10,015,377
<CGS>                                             2,675,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,908,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,051,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   29,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     350,323
<INCOME-TAX>                                        165,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 185,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        185,323
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .02



</TABLE>
HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. S.G.

A16A0201

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

March 20, 2018

A. J. Welch Jr., Megan Murren Pearson, McDonough, for Appellant.

Phyllis J. Holmen, Lisa Jane Krisher, Robert L. Ashe III, Atlanta, Michael Joseph Tafelski, for Appellee.

Bethel, Judge.

*658Our earlier decision in this case, *Henry County Board of Education v. S. G.* , 337 Ga. App. 260, 786 S.E.2d 907 (2016), was reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia, *Henry County Board of Education v. S. G.* , 301 Ga. 794, 804 S.E.2d 427 (2017). We now vacate our earlier decision, and we adopt the opinion and decision of the Supreme Court as our own. We reverse the judgment of the Superior Court and remand the case with direction that it, in turn, remand to the Board of Education for further findings and conclusions after applying the appropriate law to the evidence in accordance with this opinion.

*Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.*

Dillard, C.J., and Reese, J., concur.
STATE v. Galen Lee SMITH

206A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Smith, Galen Lee.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of July 2018 by Defendant to Amend Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Charter Welton L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                      19,614,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  375,856<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,235,404<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,235,404<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (6,294)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,989,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,995,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,995,420)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,995,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $265,050 and interest
receivable of $110,806.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $3,301,439 and net options premiums
of $(55,994).
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $771,830, accrued brokerage
fees of $119,881 and accrued management fees of $34,252.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $(2,859,783), net
change in unrealized of $1,578,590 and interest income of $1,274,899.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Vincent J. MASTANDUNO, Employee v. NATIONAL FREIGHT INDUSTRIES, Employer, and American Zurich Insurance Company, Carrier

No. 20P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2018

John M. Kirby, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Mastanduno, Vincent J.

Bruce A. Hamilton, S. Scott Farwell, Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, for National Freight Industries, et al.

*560***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of November 2018 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2018."