alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4665 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4665

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ``Zachary Smith Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

Mr. Massa (for himself, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of 
  New York, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Meeks of New 
 York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Nadler of New York, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Towns, Ms. 
   Clarke, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. McMahon, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
Serrano, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Hall of New York, Mr. Murphy of New 
 York, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Owens, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Maffei, Mr. 
Lee of New York, and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ``Zachary Smith Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Zachary Smith Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Zachary Smith 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 2.1

                              ARTICLES OF MERGER

                                      OF

                           CLEAN TOWEL SERVICE, INC.

                                     INTO

                     COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.

To the Secretary of State
State of Georgia

     Pursuant to the provisions of the Georgia Business Corporation Code
governing the merger of a domestic wholly-owned subsidiary business corporation
into its foreign parent business corporation, the foreign parent business
corporation hereinafter named does hereby adopt the following Articles of
Merger.

     FIRST:     The name of the subsidiary corporation, which is a business
     -----
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, is Clean Towel
Service, Inc.

     SECOND:   The name of the parent corporation, which is a business
     ------
corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, is Coyne
International Enterprises Corp.

     THIRD:    The number of outstanding shares of Clean Towel Services, Inc. is
     -----
4000, all of which are of one class, and all of which are owned by Coyne
International Enterprises Corp.

     FOURTH:   Attached hereto is the plan of Merger for merging Clean Towel
     ------
Service, Inc. into Coyne International Enterprises Corp. as approved by
resolution of the Board of Directors of Coyne International Enterprises
Corp.


<PAGE>

     FIFTH:  Coyne International Enterprises Corp., in its capacity as the
     -----
holder of all of the outstanding shares of Clean Towel Service, Inc., waived the
mailing of a copy of the Plan of Merger to Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
otherwise provided for under the provisions of Section 14-2-1104 of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code.

     SIXTH:  The laws of the jurisdiction of organization of Coyne
     -----
International Enterprises Corp. permit a merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary
business corporation of another jurisdiction into a parent business corporation
of the jurisdiction of organization of Coyne International Enterprises Corp.,
and the merger of Clean Towel Service, Inc. into Coyne International Enterprises
Corp, is in compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction of organization of
Coyne International Enterprises Corp.

     SEVENTH:  Shareholder approval was not required.
     -------

     EIGHTH:   This Article constitutes an undertaking by the corporation that
     -----
the request for publication of a notice of filing these Articles of Merger and
payment therefor will be made as required by subsection  (b) of Section
14-2-1105.1 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code.


Executed on this 22/nd/ day of October, 1998.


                              COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.

                                     /s/ Alexander Pobedinsky
                              BY:   ------------------------------
                                    Alexander Pobedinsky, Secretary



                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4675 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4675

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2010

  Mr. Heller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN NEVADA.

    This proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act 
of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Nevada'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Evelyn G. BECK, Appellant.

No. WD 61284.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 5, 2003.

Kent Denzel, State Public Defender Office, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Edgington, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

ORDER

Evelyn Beck appeals from her conviction after a jury trial of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo 2000. She contends that the trial court erred by overruling her objection to the State’s closing argument on two grounds. She first argues that the prosecutor allegedly failed to adequately state the time frame during which the State was required to prove her constructive possession of crack cocaine. Second, she contends that the prosecutor’s comments that appellant “did have the ability to control [the drugs]” misstated the law and misled the jury.

*537We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Curt Hecker
    
    
    
    /s/ Doug WrightCurt Hecker
Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Doug Wright
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALDO IVAN BLANCO,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00082

- CR

Appeal from

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20140D04668 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15T H DAY OF FEBRUARY , 2017

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorneys, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Robert C. Montgomery, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Jay H. Ferguson, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorneys at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Cassandra Stubbs, David Weiss, Attorneys at Law, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation of NC.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Alex T. Haskell, Attorneys at Law, Washington, DC, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, Rochester, MN, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

*361The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of July 2018 by North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
STATE v. Thomas Craig CAMPBELL

252PA14-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 2018

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Campbell, Thomas Craig.

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*596The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 29th of August 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 8th day of October 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Government owned invention available for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or CRADA Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for licensing. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Sal Sheredos, Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0473; e-mail at:                         *saleem@vard.org.*                         Any request for information should include the Number and Title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention available for licensing is: 

US Provisional Patent Application No. 60/566,099 “Transgenic Screen and Method for Screening Modulators of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Production Utilizing Pufferfish BDNF Gene Promoters” 

Dated: January 26, 2005. 

Anthony J. Principi, 

Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05-1999 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### Ruth H. WHEELER, Appellant, v. Walter L. WHEELER, Appellee.

No. 4D02-2858.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 13, 2003.

William T. Hess of Hess *&*Heathcock, Stuart, for appellant.

Faith C. Litvack of Thomas R. Garland, P.A., Port St. Lucie, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Petracca v. Petracca,*706 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

POLEN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
#### Marta A. Atiles et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 611]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated October 12, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment as there are questions of fact as to whether it negligently performed repairs at the location of the accident *(see, Quinn v City of New York,*271 AD2d 515; *cf., Verdes v Brooklyn Union Gas Co.,*253 AD2d 552). Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Marcal BROUSSARD v. STATE.

No. 2002-KH-2181.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Broussard, Marcal;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 3600-00; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 02-00234.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So .2d 1172.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6136

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT SOLOMON DAVIS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior

District Judge. (6:09-cr-00007-NKM-3)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Solomon Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Solomon Davis appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 6:09-cr00007-NKM-3 (W.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent Davis asks us to reconsider precedent 

holding that the Fair Sentencing Act has no retroactive effect

for those sentenced prior to its effective date, we decline to 

do so. See United States v. Rivers, 595 F.3d 558, 564 n.3 (4th 

Cir. 2010) (“A panel of this court cannot overrule, explicitly 

or implicitly, the precedent set by a prior panel of this 

court.” (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)).
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at December 31, 2006, and the results of the Companys operations for the year ended December 31,
2006.
 February 28, 2007
    
    /S/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. DussekChief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
Patrick Michael CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. Teresa Lynn CONNOR, Defendant.

No. COA 17-987

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 3, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, D. Brian Plunkett, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aquis
Communications Group, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:
         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):


         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.


Date:    April 12, 2004


                                         /s/ D. Brian Plunkett
                                         ---------------------------
                                         D. Brian Plunkett
                                         Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code
that, to my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009 the
(Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    ASHUTOSH
ROYAshutosh RoySeptember 25 ,2009


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided
to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.