alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Bobby Ray GRADY

249P11-7

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Bobby Grady, Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Grady, Bobby R.

K. D. Sturgis, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2018 by Defendant for Writ of Supersedeas:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.





|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 27, 2007                                                     
|                                                                            
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                    
|Martin E. Stein, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of
Regency Centers Corporation,
|general partner of registrant
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Robert C. Montgomery, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Jay H. Ferguson, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorneys at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cassandra Stubbs, David Weiss, Brian W. Stull, Attorneys at Law, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Alex T. Haskell, Attorneys at Law, Washington, DC, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, Rochester, MN, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Paul F. Khoury, Robert L. Walker, Madeline J. Cohen, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Washington, DC, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File *737Brief filed on the 6th of November 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2018."
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 28, 2018

Jay H. Ferguson, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorneys at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Irving Joyner, Attorney, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Jin Hee Lee, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorneys at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Paul F. Khoury, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Robert L. Walker, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Madeline J. Cohen, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of December 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 1st day of February 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, S. Gopalakrishnan, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Infosys Technologies Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Technologies Limited.

Date: April 30, 2008

/s/ S. GOPALAKRISHNAN**S. Gopalakrishnan***Chief Executive Officer*
Alessandra L. MCKENZIE Plaintiff, v. Steven M. MCKENZIE, Defendant.

No. COA17-854

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 

STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of the Revocation of the Driving Privileges of ) Marion County Circuit Court

) Case no. 99C-12784

TIMOTHY LEE MCNUTT, )

)

Petitioner-Appellant, Petitioner on Review, ) SC S49002

v. ) CA A109284

)

DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE )

SERVICES DIVISION (DMV), )

)

Respondent-Respondent, Respondent on Review. )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )

TODD BRADLEY MANNELIN, ) Marion County Circuit Court

) Case no. 99C-12847

Petitioner-Appellant, Petitioner on Review, ) 

v. )

) SC S49023

DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE ) CA A108316

SERVICES BRANCH (DMV), )

)

Respondent-Respondent, Respondent on Review. )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )

In the Matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of ) Marion County Circuit Court

) Case no. 99C-12646

BRAD JARRETT DELZER, )

) SC S49212

Petitioner-Appellant, Petitioner on Review, ) CA A107761

v. )

)

DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES )

BRANCH, (DMV), ) ORDER AFFIRMING

) BY AN EQUALLY

Respondent-Respondent, Respondent on Review, ) DIVIDED COURT

Upon consideration by the court.

These cases are consolidated for decision. The decision of the Court of Appeals is

affirmed by an equally divided court.

Dated this day of November 2003.

 

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Leeson, J., resigned January 31, 2003, and did not participate in the decision of this case.

Kistler, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of eGain**

**Communications Corporation**

1. eGain Communications Ltd. (UK) 

2. eGain Communications Pty Ltd. (Australia) 

3. eGain (Cayman) Ltd. (Cayman) 

4. Inference Corporation (Delaware) 

5. eGainCommunications Pvt. Ltd. (India) 

6. eGain Communications SrL (Italy) 

7. eGain Communications S.A. (France) 

8. eGain Communications B.V. (Netherlands) 

9. eGain Communications GmbH (Germany) 

10. eGainCommunications Ltd. (Ireland) 

11. eGain Communications Pacific Pte. Ltd (Singapore)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*).                 

*Agreement No.:*                     011921.                 

*Title:*                     Hapag Lloyd/CP Ships Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     CP Ships USA, LLC/CP Ships (UK) Limited, and Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmbH.                 

*Filing Parties:*                     Jeffrey F. Lawrence, Esq., and David F. Smith, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed agreement would authorize the parties to discuss and agree on rates, terms, and conditions in all U.S. trades; share space on each other's vessels; and engage in other cooperative activities. The parties request expedited review.                 

Dated: October 3, 2005. 

By order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-20135 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-U
STATE of North Carolina v. Troy ARRINGTON, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA17-1364

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

NO ERROR.
HAARHUIS v. CHEEK

332P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2017

*523Stephanie W. Anderson, Walter K. Burton, Attorneys at Law, Greensboro, Cam Bordman, Attorney at Law, New Orleans, LA, for Cheek, Emily.

J. David Stradley, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Leto Copeley, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Haarhuis, Joris (Administrator)

Robert P. Holmes, IV, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Meghan Wray Deutsch-Blanco, Attorney at Law.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of October 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dismissed without prejudice by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of October 2017."
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 15, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-13954

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 04-00002-CR-3-LAC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM EUGENE BOYETTE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 15, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed appellate counsel for William Eugene Boyette,

Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
2

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyette’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exhibit 11.1

                            STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF
                            BASIC EARNINGS AND DILUTED
                                 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Year Ended March 31,                   2002             2001            2000
                                  ---------        ---------       ---------
<S>                             <C>              <C>             <C>
Net income from continuing
  operations                     $4,403,000       $4,551,000      $4,546,000
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued
  operations                       (271,000)      (4,547,000)        154,000
Estimated loss on disposal       (3,256,000)            -               -
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Net income                       $  876,000       $    4,000      $4,700,000
                                ===========      ===========     ===========
BASIC:
 Weighted average number of
  common shares basic             5,071,125        5,076,456       4,812,610
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Basic earnings per share from
  continuing operations               $0.86            $0.90           $0.95
Basic earnings (loss) per share
  from discontinued operations        (0.05)           (0.90)           0.03
Basic loss per share on disposal
  of discontinued operations          (0.64)            -               -
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Basic earnings per share              $0.17            $0.00           $0.98
                                ===========      ===========     ===========

DILUTED:
 Weighted average number of
  common shares basic             5,071,125        5,076,456       4,812,610
 Common stock equivalents from
  options computed utilizing the
  treasury-stock method based on
  the average fair market value
  of common stock during the
  period                            137,799          140,148         307,637
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent
  shares   diluted                5,208,924        5,216,604       5,120,247
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Diluted earnings per share from
  continuing operations               $0.85            $0.87           $0.89
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
  from discontinued operations        (0.05)           (0.87)           0.03
Diluted loss per share on
  disposal of discontinued
  operations                          (0.63)            -               -
                                -----------      -----------     -----------
Diluted earnings per share            $0.17            $0.00           $0.92
                                ===========      ===========     ===========

</TABLE>
Christopher LAMPKINS, Employee, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Employer, Self-insured (Corvel Corporation, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant.

No. COA18-483

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0555 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEPHANIE LYNN LEDOUX,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 23, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 16 2023

05/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0555
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4762 

To reduce the pay of Members of Congress and dedicate the annual savings 

to a reduction of the national debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce the pay of Members of Congress and dedicate 

the annual savings to a reduction of the national debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Pay Cut 

5 for Debt Reduction Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4762 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS 

2 AND ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY AD3 JUSTMENTS. 

4 (a) REDUCTION OF PAY.—Section 601(a)(1) of the 

5 Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(1)) 

6 is amended by inserting ‘‘90 percent of’’ before ‘‘the rate 

7 determined for such positions’’. 

8 (b) ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST9 MENTS.—Section 601(a) of such Act is amended by strik10 ing paragraph (2). 

11 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1) 

12 of such Act is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 

14 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

15 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

16 and 

17 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

18 of this subsection’’. 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall take effect on December 31, 2010. 

21 SEC. 3. DEDICATION OF SAVINGS TO REDUCTION OF NA22 TIONAL DEBT. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

24 beginning of each fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treas25 ury shall calculate the reduction in outlays expected to 

26 occur during the fiscal year as a result of the application 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4762 IH

1 of the amendments made by section 2, and transfer an 

2 amount equal to such reduction out of the general fund 

3 of the Treasury and to the account established under sec4 tion 3113(d) of title 31, United States Code, to reduce 

5 the public debt. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not less than 60 days before each 

7 transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treas8 ury shall submit to the Congress a report setting forth 

9 the amount of the proposed transfer and the methodology 

10 used by the Secretary to calculate the amount. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Darren Wayne GENTLE

No. 240A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed February 1, 2019

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Richard J. Costanza, Southern Pines, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Vincent BORDINI, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., and Earl Phillip, Defendants.

No. COA18-409

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Miscellaneous Docket No. 891

IN RE CAROL A. MURPHY,

Petitioner.

On Writ of Mandamus from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 08-

CV-343, Judge Lynn J. Bush.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Before GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Carol A. Murphy petitions for a writ of mandamus to compel the United States

Court of Federal Claims to hear her case and moves for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis.

On May 9, 2008, Murphy filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal

Claims alleging that six federal judges violated her due process and constitutional rights

in their rulings in her cases. On May 29, 2008, the court removed her case from the

court and referred it to the court's chief judge for consideration as a complaint of judicial

misconduct. This petition for writ of mandamus followed.

The remedy of mandamus is available only in extraordinary situations to correct a

clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power. In re Calmer, Inc., 854 F.2d

461, 464 (Fed. Cir. 1988). A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has

no other means of attaining the relief desired, Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the

Southern Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the
writ is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35

(1980).

Murphy fails to meet her burden of establishing the two requirements for

mandamus.	First, we are not persuaded that the Court of Federal Claims erred in

determining	that Murphy's civil complaint was actually a complaint of judicial

misconduct.	Therefore, Murphy has not shown that her right to a particular result is

clear and indisputable. Allied Chemical, 449 U.S. at 35. Second, because Murphy

could have	pursued her dispute through an ordinary appeal, she is unable to

demonstrate that she had no alternative means of obtaining the relief requested.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Murphy's petition is denied.

Murphy's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 6 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Date FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Carol A. Murphy

Stephen C. Tosini, Esq. FEB 0 6 2009

s20	

iii

Misc. 891

- 2 -
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-5164

ROBERT A. BERMAN,

and SYLVIA M. BERMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-856, Judge Lawrence

J. Block.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April

21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 6, 2008 order.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

APR 17 2009	

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Sallie W. Gladney, Esq.

Deborah K. Snyder, Esq.

s20

ClOtliglgots THE F	colcusioR

APR 17 2009

JWV HORLIALY

CLERIC