alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**I, Kerry W. Boekelheide, certify that:     1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC;     2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions);          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 14, 2007
IN RE: J.B.

335P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2018

Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, for J.B.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, Janelle Varley, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of October 2018 by Juvenile for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of October 2018."
#### In re Appeal of Decision of DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 02-PDB-164.

No. 2003-OB-1603.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Weatherton, Dorothy Annise;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of the Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 02-PDB-164.

Leave to appeal denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 2184

_____________________________
S YLVESTER H AMILTON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Melissa G. Olin , Judge

.

June 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
W e affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence

. Based on our review of the record pursuant to Anders
, * we note that the probation revocation order does not correctly indicate that Appellant violated Conditions 1, 2, 3, and 14 of his probation.

A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

* Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES
GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 11, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Diana M. Laing     
|                         |  |  |  | Diana M. Laing         
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph RAGLAND

No. 226P13-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Joseph K. Ragland, for Ragland, Joseph.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 4th of October 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Johnston County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of October 2018."
# Official Journal C 234A/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 234A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6020 July 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 234A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6020 July 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 234 A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/322/16 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 234 A/01

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/322/16 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of Cybill V. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Joel V., Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 286]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Richmond County (McElrath, J.), dated November 18, 1997, as, after a hearing, found that he neglected the subject children, and (2) from an order of disposition of the same court, entered March 11, 1998, which, *inter alia,*placed the children in the custody of the mother.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence at *583the fact-finding hearing that the father neglected his daughter in that he engaged in acts of violence against her mother in the child’s presence, thereby creating an imminent danger that the child’s physical, mental, and emotional health would be harmed *(see, Matter of Tami G.,*209 AD2d 869; *see also, Matter of Athena M.,*253 AD2d 669; *Matter of Deandre T.,*253 AD2d 497; *Matter of Lonell J.,*242 AD2d 58).

The evidence also supports a finding of derivative neglect with regard to the petitioner’s son *(see, Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Brittney C.],*242 AD2d 533, 534; *Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E.],*191 AD2d 694; *Matter of Rasheda S.,*183 AD2d 770; *Matter of Christina Maria C.,*89 AD2d 855). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
#### George H. BORNSIDE and Bette B. Bornside v. TENET HEALTHSYSTEM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al.

No. 2003-CC-1477.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center Inc. d/b/a; Memorial Medical Center-Mercy Campus; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, No. 2000-1864; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-0490.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant the writ.

TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ.

WEIMER, J., would grant the writ.
STATE v. James Harold COURTNEY, III

160PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2018

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Courtney, James Harold (III).

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 6th of December 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of December 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 28th day of January 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### Merwin F. Wooten, *Appellant,*v. Brevard County, Florida, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 9, 1928.

*Kay, Adams, Ragland é Kurz,*for Appellant;

*L. C. Grofton*and *W. D. Wilson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell, are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. Mr. Justice Strum, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting sis members in a body and after full consultation it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should' be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and decreed under the authority of State *ex rel.*Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
STATE v. Torrey GRADY

179A14-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 6, 2018

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Luke M. Everett, Attorney at Law, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, for Grady, Torrey Dale.

Christopher A. Brook, Legal Director, for American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of October 2018 by Nathan Freed Wessler for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of November 2018."
Order entered December 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01457-CV

IN RE SOUTHPAK CONTAINER CORPORATION AND CLEVELAND STEEL 

CONTAINER CORPORATION, Relators

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-05714-C

ORDER

In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of mandamus 

is DENIED IN PART and conditionally GRANTED IN PART. The Court ORDERS the trial 

judge, the Honorable Sally Montgomery, Judge of Dallas County Court at Law No. 3, to 

(a) VACATE the portion of paragraph 1 of her “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel 

Deposition of Robert McIntyre” that requires testimony on matters protected by the attorneyclient and work product privileges, (b) VACATE paragraph 3 of the order, and (c) ENTER an 

order excluding privileged information from the scope of paragraph 1 and eliminating paragraph 

3 from the topics on which Robert McIntyre may be questioned at his deposition.

Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. The Court 

ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

order, a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order.
We ORDER that relators recover their costs of this original proceeding from real parties 

in interest.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Motion Granted; Order filed September 30, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00369

- CR

____________ JOSE TRETO , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1894823



### ORDER
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have
been filed. Appellant has filed a motion requesting this appeal be abated for entry
of findings of fact and conclusions of law

. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court is required
to make them. State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696 , 698

– 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The motion is granted.Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of

fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and have a supplemental clerk’s record contai ning those findings filed with the clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket wh en the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.02






















CONSENT OF TRACY ARMSTRONG







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the “Technical Study”) concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading “Item III – Description of the Business – Coulon Property – 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,













			
	/S/ Tracy Armstrong

	 
	 

	Name:

Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.

	 
	 









May 13, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                       ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned certifies that she is an Assistant Vice President of GreenPoint
Credit LLC (the "Servicer") and that, as such, she is duly authorized to execute
and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Servicer pursuant to Section 4.20
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of November
1, 1999 between GreenPoint, Credit, LLC., as Seller and Servicer, and Bank One,
National Association, as Trustee, (all capitalized terms used herein without
definition having the respective meanings specified in the Agreement) and
further certifies that:

1.   I have reviewed the activities for the one year period ending December 31,
     1999 and performance under this agreement has been made under such
     officer's supervision under Section 4.20 of the Agreement; and

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
     fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto my signature this 29th day of
February, 2000.



                                         GREENPOINT CREDIT, LLC

                                         By__________________________________
                                            Mary Churley
                                            Assistant Vice President and Manager
                                            Investor Servicing
# Official Journal C 260/19 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 260 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4819 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 260

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4819 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2005/C 260/1 | Special Report No 4/2005 concerning the Commission’s management of economic cooperation in Asia, together with the Commission’s replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2005/C 260/1

Special Report No 4/2005 concerning the Commission’s management of economic cooperation in Asia, together with the Commission’s replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael P.      Kurtanjek                                                      |   |   |        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Michael      P. Kurtanjek, President  & Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |        |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)                                                 |   |   |   |   |

----
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the quarterly report of ERICO International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to such officer’sknowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and forthe periods expressed in the Report.         Date: August 10, 2005                   By: /s/ William H. Roj               Name: William H. Roj      Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer        and Director               By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber               Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber      Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
In the MATTER OF: N.J.M.G.

No. COA18-715

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for
      the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Kirk Stingley, Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




November
      7, 2008




*/s/
                Kirk Stingley*Kirk
                Stingley,Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, F. Carl Edmunds, P.Geo., and the information that I reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 22nd day of March, 2017.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ F. Carl Edmunds


F. Carl Edmunds,  P.Geo.