alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Benjamin G. Wolff, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Clearwire Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.        Date: November 14, 2007 /s/ BENJAMIN G. WOLFF   Benjamin G. Wolff   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4502 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4502

 To authorize the Attorney General to exempt certain products from the 
     requirements of subsections (d) and (e) of section 310 of the 
 Controlled Substances Act if it is not practical to use such products 
             in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2014

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
  on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Attorney General to exempt certain products from the 
     requirements of subsections (d) and (e) of section 310 of the 
 Controlled Substances Act if it is not practical to use such products 
             in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Meth Labs and Enhance Patient 
Access Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION IF IT IS NOT PRACTICAL TO USE PRODUCT IN ILLICIT 
              MANUFACTURE OF METHAMPHETAMINE.

    Section 310(e)(3) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
830(e)(3)) is amended by striking ``if the Attorney General determines 
that the product cannot be used in the illicit manufacture of 
methamphetamine'' and inserting ``if the Attorney General determines 
that it is not practical by processes known to be employed by 
clandestine laboratory operators to use the product in the illicit 
manufacture of methamphetamine''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4663 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4663

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit certain nurse 
 practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, and 
certified nurse-midwives to provide certain certifications with respect 
       to inpatient hospital services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2014

 Mrs. Black (for herself and Ms. Schakowsky) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit certain nurse 
 practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, and 
certified nurse-midwives to provide certain certifications with respect 
       to inpatient hospital services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Patient Access and Promote 
Hospital Efficiency Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING CERTAIN NURSE PRACTITIONERS, CLINICAL NURSE 
              SPECIALISTS, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, AND CERTIFIED NURSE-
              MIDWIVES TO PROVIDE CERTAIN CERTIFICATIONS WITH RESPECT 
              TO INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1814(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395f(a)(3)) is amended by inserting ``(or, in the case of such 
inpatient hospital services ordered by a nurse practitioner, clinical 
nurse specialist, physician assistant (as such terms are defined in 
section 1861(aa)(5)), or a certified nurse-midwife (as such term is 
defined in section 1861(gg)) who is privileged and credentialed at the 
hospital at which such services are to be furnished, the nurse 
practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, physician assistant, or 
certified nurse-midwife)'' after ``a physician''.
    (b) No Effect on State Scope of Practice Law.--Nothing in this 
section, including the amendment made by this section, shall be 
construed as, or have the effect of, changing any State scope of 
practice law for any health care professional.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward M. ALONZO

No. 288PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Daniel K. Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Alonzo, Edward M.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Ellen A. Newby, Assistant Attorney General, Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of October 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
KINGS HARBOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Roy T. GOLDMAN and Wife, Diana H. Goldman, Defendants.

No. COA17-1301

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 16, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
Exhibit
13.1  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of DaimlerChrysler AG (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Dr. Dieter Zetsche, as Chairman of the Board of
Management of the Company, and Bodo Uebber, as Member of the Board of
Management, Finance & Controlling / Financial Services, of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:  (1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ DIETER ZETSCHEName:
  Dr. Dieter ZetscheTitle:
  Chairman of the Board
  of Management / Head of Mercedes Car GroupDate:
  February 27, 2007/s/ BODO UEBBERName:
  Bodo UebberTitle:
  Member of the Board of
  ManagementFinance &
  Controlling / Financial ServicesDate:
  February 27, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 GENERAL NUTRITION CENTERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Nutrition
Centers, Inc. (the Company), for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Louis Mancini, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
David Heilman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Louis ManciniName: Louis ManciniTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 5, 2004
 /s/ David HeilmanName: David HeilmanTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 5, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Page 42 of 42
Exhibit 7.  DaimlerChrysler AG and its Consolidated
Subsidiaries Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges  Year Ended December 31,(in millions of , except
  ratios)
  
  2002
  
  2003
  
  2004
  
  2005
  
  2006EARNINGSIncome/(loss) from continuing operations
  before income taxes, minority interests, and cumulative effects of changes in
  accounting principles
  
  5,925
  
  596
  
  3,535
  
  3,438
  
  3,993Add:Fixed charges
  
  4,102
  
  3,383
  
  3,199
  
  4,312
  
  4,649Amortization of previously capitalized
  interest
  
  134
  
  119
  
  107
  
  104
  
  97Dividends received from equity investees
  
  133
  
  80
  
  107
  
  122
  
  159Deduct:Capitalized interest
  
  (147
  )
  (100
  )
  (70
  )
  (73
  )
  (73
  )(Income)/loss from equity investees
  
  134
  
  538
  
  937
  
  (103
  )
  (318
  )Earnings
  available for fixed charges
  
  10,281
  
  4,616
  
  7,815
  
  7,800
  
  8,507FIXED
  CHARGESInterest expense
  
  3,709
  
  3,034
  
  2,828
  
  3,924
  
  4,256Capitalized interest
  
  147
  
  100
  
  70
  
  73
  
  73Interest portion of rent expense 1)
  
  246
  
  249
  
  301
  
  315
  
  320Total fixed
  charges
  
  4,102
  
  3,383
  
  3,199
  
  4,312
  
  4,649RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  
  2.51
  
  1.36
  
  2.44
  
  1.81
  
  1.83  
 1) One third of all rental expenses is
deemed to be interest.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4820 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4820

 To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis 
   of sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2010

  Mr. Nadler of New York (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis 
   of sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair and Inclusive Housing Rights 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ACT AND RELATED PROVISIONS.

    (a) Housing Sale and Rental, Residential Real Estate-Related 
Transactions, and Brokerage Services.--
            (1) Section 804 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3604) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
            (2) Section 805 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3605) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
            (3) Section 806 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3606) is 
        amended by inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' 
        after ``sex,''.
    (b) Prevention of Intimidation.--Section 901 of the Civil Rights 
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) is amended by inserting ``sexual 
orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex,'' each place it appears.
    (c) Definition.--Section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 
3602) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(p) `Gender identity' means the gender-related identity, 
        appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related 
        characteristics of an individual, with or without regard to the 
        individual's designated sex at birth.
            ``(q) `Sexual orientation' means homosexuality, 
        heterosexuality, or bisexuality.''.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/13/2015

STATE OF TEXAS Tr. Ct. No. 99-11-06435-CR AP-77,043

I have this day received and filed the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing in the abovestyled and numbered cause. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be

filed in this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b).]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

PHILIP H. HILDER

HILDER & ASSOCIATES, P. C.

819 LOVETT BLVD.

HOUSTON, TX 77006OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/13/2015

STATE OF TEXAS Tr. Ct. No. 99-11-06435-CR AP-77,043

I have this day received and filed the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing in the abovestyled and numbered cause. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be

filed in this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b).]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

WILLIAM J. DELMORE III

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

207 W. PHILLLIPS, SECOND FLOOR

CONROE, TX 77301

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/13/2015

STATE OF TEXAS Tr. Ct. No. 99-11-06435-CR AP-77,043

I have this day received and filed the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing in the abovestyled and numbered cause. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be

filed in this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b).]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY

BRETT LIGON

207 W. PHILLIPS, SECOND FLOOR

CONROE, TX 77301

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/13/2015

STATE OF TEXAS Tr. Ct. No. 99-11-06435-CR AP-77,043

I have this day received and filed the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing in the abovestyled and numbered cause. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be

filed in this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b).]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

JAMES GREGORY RYTTING

819 LOVETT BLVD

HOUSTON, TX 77006-3905

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/13/2015

STATE OF TEXAS Tr. Ct. No. 99-11-06435-CR AP-77,043

I have this day received and filed the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing in the abovestyled and numbered cause. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be

filed in this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b).]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

BRYCE E. BENJET

40 WORTH STREET SUITE 701

NEW YORK, NY 10013

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 20601 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. RO BE RT D AN I EL D AV I S D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 01- C R
- 140- 1 B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T an d D E N N IS, C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * R obertD an i elD avis , federalpri soner # 974 10-079, app eal s t h e di st ri ct c o u r t ’ s d i s m i s s a lo f h i s m o t i o n t o v a c a t e a s a n u n a u t h o r i z e d s u c c e s s iv e 2 8 U. S . C. § 2 255 m ot i on . D avis ’ s m ot i on to va cat e sou gh tto c h al l en ge h i s 2001 convi ct i on ands e nt e nc e due t o l ac k of subj e c tm at t e ra nd t e r r i t o r i alj ur i s di c t i o n. Thus , t he m o tio n w a s p r o p e r lyc o n s tr u e d a s a r is in gu n d e r§ 2 2 5 5 . S ee T ol l i ver v. D obre , 2 1 1 F .3 d 8 7 6 , 8 7 7 -7 8 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ). B e c a u s e D a v is ’ s m o ti o n w a s p r o p e r ly c o ns t r ue d a s a r i s i ng unde r§ 2 25 5, t hi s co ur tl ac ks j ur i s di c t i o n ov e rt he i ns t ant United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

17, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 20601

2 a p p ea lab sen t a certif i ca te of ap p ea l a b i lity ( C O A) ru l i n g in the distri ct cou rt. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Y ou ngblood , 1 16 F. 3d1 11 3, 1 11 4- 15 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 99 7) . The d i st r i c tc our tdi d notc ons t r ue D avi s’ s not i c e o f appealas a CO Ar equ est. H ow ev er, th i s cou rt d ecli n es t o rem a n d th i s ca se i n l i gh t of t h e p a ten t f rivo l i ty o f D a v is ’ s a p p e a l . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. A l varez , 210 F . 3d 309 , 310 ( 5th C i r. 20 00 ) . Ac c o r di ngl y, t he i ns t anta ppe ali s D I SM I SSED f o rl ac k o f

j ur i s di c t i o n.
SYKES, et al. v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

248A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Robert E. Fields, III, Attorney at Law, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorney at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, Leon E. Porter, Attorney at Law, Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Sykes, Susan, et al.

Elizabeth L. Winters, Attorney at Law, Chad D. Hansen, Attorney at Law, Adam H. Charnes, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina

D. Erik Albright, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Cigna Healthcare of North Carolina, Inc.

Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Medcost LLC

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Greensboro

Benjamin R. Norman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro

W. Michael Dowling, Attorney at Law *621The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of January 2019 for Christina E. Fahmy to be admitted Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
#### STATE ex rel. Lee HUDSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2003-KH-2181.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Hudson, Lee;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 97300.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the district court for its consideration.