alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Insignia Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's
knowledge, information and belief, that

         The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 19, 2003
                                                       /s/Andrew L. Farkas
                                                       -------------------
                                                       Andrew L. Farkas
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 19, 2003
                                                       /s/James A. Aston
                                                       -----------------
                                                       James A. Aston
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
## **Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Richard A. Lozyniak, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BlueRidge Paper Products Inc (the “registrant”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andwe have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 14,2005

 
| ** **                             | **/S/ RICHARD  A. LOZYNIAK** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------|
| Richard A. Lozyniak                    |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         ACC Lease Co., Inc.
         PCPCS Corporation
         American Cellular Wireless LLC
         Alexadra Cellular Corporation
         Chill Cellular Corporation
         ACC of West Virginia Corporation
         ACC of Pennsylvania LLC
         ACC of Tennessee LLC
         ACC of Minnesota Corporation
         ACC of Michigan Corporation
         Dutchess County Cellular TelCo, Inc.
         ACC of Ohio Corporation
         ACC of Wisconsin LLC
         ACC of Kentucky LLC
         Alton CellTelCo Cellular Corporation
         Alton CellTel Co
         ACC of Wausau Corporation
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                     List of Subsidiaries of the Companies
                     -------------------------------------
                                        
Subsidiary                                              Jurisdiction
----------                                              ------------    

Simon Property Group, L.P.                                  Delaware
SPG Realty Consultants, L.P.                                Delaware
SPG Properties, Inc.                                        Delaware
SD Property Group, Inc.                                         Ohio
The Retail Property Trust                              Massachusetts
Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.                       Illinois
Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.                             Texas
Shopping Center Associates                                  New York
DeBartolo Capital Partnership                               Delaware
Simon Capital Limited Partnership                           Delaware
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.                               Delaware
M.S. Management Associates, Inc.                            Delaware
DeBartolo Properties Management, Inc.                           Ohio


     Omits names of subsidiaries which as of December 31, 1998 were not, in the
aggregate, a "significant subsidiary".
Exhibit 12.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Gentry Resources Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  June 23, 2003





/s/ Ketan Panchmatia



Ketan Panchmatia

Chief Financial Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Ronald HILTS, Jr. v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. 2003-C-1258.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Hilts, Ronald Jr.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Worker’s Compensation District 2, No. 00-09539; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 02-1440.

Denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Wayne RYCKELEY

No. 154P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Joseph P. Lattimore, Attorney at Law, for Ryckeley, Kenneth Wayne.

B. Carrington Skinner, IV, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*383"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

     I, Mark Joseph Corrao, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-QSB  of  StrikeForce
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls
and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation,  particularly  during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.





                  /s/ Mark Joseph Corrao
                  ----------------------
                  Mark Joseph Corrao
                  Chief Financial Officer

                  August 19, 2005
Jonathan E. BRUNSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 12TH PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT, the North Carolina Department of Social Services, and the State of North Carolina, Defendants.

No. COA18-658

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRANT HEWITT BALDERREE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JEFFREY BEARD,*

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-56619

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-02782-LAB

MEMORANDUM**

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 23, 2014*** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Grant Hewitt Balderree appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

FILED

SEP 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Jeffrey

Beard is substituted for his predecessor, Matthew Cate, as Secretary of the

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review a district court’s denial of a

habeas corpus petition de novo, see Stanley v. Cullen, 633 F.3d 852, 859 (9th Cir.

2011), and we affirm.

Balderree contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to

communicate with him. The state court concluded that this claim lacked merit

because Balderree did not show a reasonable probability of a different outcome

absent the alleged deficiency of trial counsel. The state court’s rejection of this

claim was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), nor based on an unreasonable determination of

facts in light of the evidence presented. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Moreover,

because any new evidence could not be considered in federal habeas proceedings,

the district court properly adjudicated Balderree’s claim without conducting an

evidentiary hearing. See Gulbrandson v. Ryan, 738 F.3d 976, 993-94 & n.6 (9th

Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2823 (2014).

We construe Balderree’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the

certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-

1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-56619
#### In re Christopher B. HEBERT.

No. 2003-OB-1814.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 2003.

In re Hebert, Christopher B.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Permission to Take Bar Examination.

Granted. Petitioner is allowed to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination in July 2003. Within fifteen days of notification that he has satisfactorily passed this examination, petitioner may file a brief with this court, supported by appropriate documentary evidence, setting forth the facts of the 1996 honor code violation and explaining his failure to disclose this violation of his bar application.
|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| "*/**s**/*"                Charles E. Jenkins                                                           |   |   |        |
| Charles                E. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer (Principal                Financial Officer) |   |   |        |

----
##### 



SEVENTH AMENDMENT OF
LOAN AGREEMENT
 th




---



##### 



Repayment
 2




---



##### 



th
    3




---



##### 



FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHABy:Title:SUMMIT HOTEL PROPERTIES, LLC,
a South Dakota limited liability
company, by its Company Manager,
THE SUMMIT GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Kerry W. BoekelheideKerry W. Boekelheide,PresidentSUMMIT HOSPITALITY V, LLC, a 
South Dakota limited liability company,
by its member, SUMMIT HOTEL
PROPERTIES, LLC, a South Dakota
limited liability company, by its
Company Manager, THE SUMMIT
GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Kerry W. BoekelheideKerry W. Boekelheide,President
 4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
(Term Note Form)
  $
    

, 200___
 
 1 4




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



SUMMIT HOTEL PROPERTIES, LLC, a SouthDakota limited liability company, by THESUMMIT GROUP, INC., its Company ManagerBy:Kerry W. Boekelheide, PresidentSUMMIT HOSPITALITY V, LLC, a SouthDakota limited liability company, by itsmember, SUMMIT HOTEL PROPERTIES,LLC, a South Dakota limited liability company,by its Company Manager, THE SUMMITGROUP, INC.By:Kerry W. Boekelheide, President
 9
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  --------------------------------------------------------------------  In connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: December 13, 2010   /s/ Mark L. Kay Mark L. Kay Chief Executive Officer   1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Entech Environmental Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Burr D. Northrop,  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 13, 2006

/s/   R. B. Lassetter
----------------------------
Principal Accounting Officer
In the MATTER OF: J.P.N.

No. COA18-622

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 5, 2019

AFFIRMED.
#### Robert David RILEY, Respondent, v. Tracy Lynn RILEY, Appellant.

No. WD 61932.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 29, 2003.

James R. Wyrseh, KC, MO, for appellant.

Barbara L. Teeple, Tipton, MO, for respondent.

Before: HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.

*878ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Riley appeals the marital dissolution judgment awarding Robert Riley primary physical custody of their two children. For reasons stated in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PETER CHAMBRE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Peter Chambre, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge
Antibody Technology Group plc;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

                                                          Date: October 14, 2003


                                             /s/ Peter Chambre
                                             ___________________________________
                                             Name: Peter Chambre
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer