alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1607-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated September 24, 2005, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2005:

The parishes of Allen, Lafourche, and Terrebonne for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency 
protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance 
program, including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-19811 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
polaris103.htm






AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of the 1st day of January 2013 to the ADVISORY AGREEMENT made as of the 30th day of April, 2007, among CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC (formerly Demeter Management Corporation), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Manager”), MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY KAISER I, LLC (formerly Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Kaiser I, LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Company”) and KAISER TRADING GROUP PTY. LTD., a private company organized under the laws of Australia (the “Trading Advisor”), as previously amended by an Amendment to the Advisory Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (together the “Agreement”).


 







 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Trading Manager, the Trading Company and the Trading Advisor wish to amend the Advisory Agreement to increase the amount of leverage used to manage the Trading Company’s assets.


 


NOW, therefore, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. The first sentence of Section 2(f) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


 


In performing services to the Trading Company, the Trading Advisor shall utilize its Global Diversified Program (the “Trading Program”), as described in the Disclosure Document, and as modified from time to time; provided, however, that the Trading Manager and the Trading Company agree that amount of leverage applied to the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager shall be 2.0 times the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager (the “Trading Level”), unless otherwise agreed by the parties hereto in writing.  The Trading Advisor shall trade the Trading Company’s assets on the basis of the Trading Level.


 


2. The first sentence of Section 5(a)(i) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


 


The Trading Company shall pay the Trading Advisor a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 2% (a 2% annual rate) of the Net Assets (as defined in Section 5(c) hereof) as of the first day of each month (the “Management Fee”).


 


3. In all other respects the Advisory Agreement remains unchanged and of full force and effect.


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 


CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC












By                                                                        


Walter Davis


President







MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY KAISER I, LLC 







By:  Ceres Managed Futures LLC


(Trading Manager)












By                                                                        


Walter Davis


President












KAISER TRADING GROUP PTY. LTD.












By                                                                           


Karl O’Shaughnessy


Director


 


 


 


- 2 -
Joseph Lee HAM v. Supt. David MILLIS, et al.

No. 391P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 07, 2018

Joseph Lee Ham, for Ham, Joseph Lee.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for Millis, David (Supt.), et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 6th of December 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Carteret County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2018."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    1,902,954             2,972,040
<SECURITIES>                                      0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                26,214                11,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                     0
<INVENTORY>                                       0                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,996,483<F1>         3,049,682<F2>
<PP&E>                                            0                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,996,483             3,049,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       102,414               161,560
<BONDS>                                           0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                     0
<COMMON>                                          0                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                1,894,069             2,888,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,996,483             3,049,682
<SALES>                                           0                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             92,376             5,364,763
<CGS>                                             0                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            298,707               671,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (206,331)             4,698,325
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (206,331)             4,698,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                     0
<CHANGES>                                         0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              (206,331)             4,698,325
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.021)                 0.470
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.021)                 0.470
<FN>
<F1> Includes prepaid insurance of $67,315.
<F2> Includes prepaid insurance of $66,082.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-79225 and 333-51034) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 1998 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-51032) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (FormS-8 Nos. 333-115763 and 333-131800) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2003 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-117889) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan, and (Form S-8 No. 333-124955)pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Award Plan of our reports dated August 25, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Corinthian Colleges, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Orange County, California 

August 25, 2009
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE

CO MPANY

,

Appellant,

v.

MARIA GARCIA AND ANTHONY

GARCIA

.

Appellee ’s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00 0 75

- C V

Appeal from the

34 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2005

- 6345 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until August 14

, 201 5

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELL EE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jeffrey B. Pownell , the Appell ee ’s attorney, prepare

the Appell ee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 14 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of August , 20 1 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez

, and Hughes, JJ.

( Hughe s, J., not participating )
<PAGE>   1

                                       22




                                  EXHIBIT 6.11

This letter of Intent is made the 30th day of January 2000, between


Delta Capital Technologies Inc.
Suite B-201
1331 Homer Street
Vancouver, BC  V6B 5M5
Canada (herein after "Delta")

and

Matridigm Corporation
Suite 804
16th Ave SW
Calgary, AB  T2R 0S9
Canada (herein after "Matridigm")

and shall outline the basic terms of an agreement to be executed at a later
date.

Terms:

1.      Delta is a public company trading on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board
         and its focus is the e-Business industry;
2.      The parties agree that a formal agreement clarifying the terms of this
         letter of intent will be drafted and that the parties shall complete
         the agreement prior to March 31, 2000;
3.      Delta shall acquire all the shares from the shareholders of Matridigm;
4.      Delta shall issue 500,000 shares ("the Delta shares") in exchange for
         all the shares of Matridigm;
5.      Delta shall pay to Matridigm $100,000 cash within 30 days of closing;
6.      Delta shall appoint Michael Steele of Matridigm to its Board of
         Directors;
7.      Delta shall put in place not later than April 1, 2000 a Stock Option
         Plan whereby the Company is authorized to issue annually up to five per
         cent (5%) of the total number of common shares issued and outstanding
         as of December 31, of the proceeding year. These options shall be
         available to directors, employees and consultants as scheduled in the
         completed agreement;
8.      Delta shall enter into employment contracts with its key employees, to
         include key Delta and Matridigm employees prior to the close of this
         transaction;
9.      Delta currently plans to maintain Matridigm as a wholly subsidiary but
         it reserves the right to amalgamate at a future date;
10.      Matridigm has provided Delta with financial and other documentation for
         Delta's due diligence;
11.      It is understood by the parties that prior to Delta completing the
         agreement, it shall require Board of Directors approval.


The parties agree to these general terms and further agree to negotiate in good
faith a mutually satisfactory final contract using this document as its basis.


/S/ Paul F. Davis
------------------------------------
Paul F. Davis
Delta Capital Technologies Inc.



/S/ Mike Steele
------------------------------------
Mike Steele
Matridigm Corporation
The STATE v. ALMANZA.

A17A1270

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

December 13, 2018

Charles Prescott Boring, Michael Scott Carlson, Augusta, John Richard Edwards, Amelia Greeson Pray, D. Victor Reynolds, Marietta, Lindsay Beth Gardner, for Appellant

Ashleigh Bartkus Merchant, John B. Merchant III, Marietta, Cindi Lee Yeager, for Appellee

Gobeil, Judge.

*407In *State v. Almanza* , 304 Ga. 553, 820 S.E.2d 1 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this Court in *State v. Almanza* , 344 Ga. App. 38, 807 S.E.2d 517 (2017). Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with that opinion, we vacate that part of the trial court's order finding inadmissible statements made by the mother of the alleged child molestation victim to the child's physicians, in which the mother identified Almanza as the perpetrator of the alleged molestation. We remand for the trial court to consider whether the statements at issue are admissible under OCGA § 24-8-803 (4), pursuant to the test set forth in *United States v. Renville* , 779 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1985).

*Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.*

McFadden, P. J., and Coomer, J., concur.
March 9, 1999



Attn:  Asset-Backed Securities Trust Services Group - CMAC, Series 1998-C1
LaSalle National Bank
135 South LaSalle Street
Suite 1625
Chicago, IL  60674-4107



    Commercial Mortgage Acceptance Corp., Commercial Mortgage
                           Pass-Through Certificates
                                 Series 1998-C1


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to the  requirements  of that certain  Pooling and Servicing  Agreement
governing the referenced Trust (the "PSA"),  it is hereby certified that (i) the
undersigned  has  completed  a  review  of  the  Servicer's  performance  of its
obligations under the PSA for the current calendar year; (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's  knowledge on the basis of that review the Servicer has  fulfilled
its obligations  under the PSA throughout such period;  (iii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, the sub-servicer, if any, has fulfilled its obligations
under its sub-servicing  agreement in all  material respects; and (iv) no notice
has been received from any  governmental  agency or body which would  indicate a
challenge or question as to the status of the Trust's  qualification  as a REMIC
under the Code.



                              /s/ Charles J. Sipple              3/9/99
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Charles J. Sipple                   Date
                              Senior Vice President



                              /s/ Paula J. Mickelson             3/9/99
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Paula J. Mickelson                  Date
                              Vice President


cc:   Please see attached page



<PAGE>


Officer's Certificate
March 9, 1999
Page 2


cc:   Attn:  Commercial Mortgage Surveillance Manager
      Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
      25 Broadway
      New York, NY  10004-0000

      Attn:  Commercial MBS Monitoring Dept.
      Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
      99 Church Street
      New York, NY 10007-0000
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I. John B. Wadsworth, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blue RidgePaper Products Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 12, 2004

 
|                          | **/S/  JOHN B. WADSWORTH** |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| John B. Wadsworth             |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

1

----
**Exhibit      32. **

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of **

**Atlantic      Coast Federal Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act      of      2002**

|   | 1. | the                report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|                                                                               |   |   |                                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                               |   |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/              Robert J.              Larison, Jr.                               |   |   |  /s/              Jon C. Parker, Sr.                                             |
| Robert              J. Larison, Jr.                                                |   |   | Jon              C. Parker , Sr.                                                      |
| President                and                Chief                Executive Officer |   |   | Senior                Vice- President and Chief                Financial Officer |

----
**Exhibit 23 (b)**

 

 

**Statement Regarding Consent ofArthur Andersen LLP**

 

Section 11(a) of theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be statedtherein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) mayassert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement. 

 

On February 23, 2001, the Registrant decided to no longerengage Arthur Andersen LLP (“Arthur Andersen”) as its independent public accountants and appointed KPMG LLP to serve as its independent public accountants for the fiscal year 2001. In 2002, Arthur Andersen ceased practicing before theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). As a result, the Registrant has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into registration statements filed with the Commission bythe Registrant of their audit report with respect to the Registrant’s consolidated financial statements as of 

December 31, 2000,included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

The absence of such consent may limit recovery by investors on certain claims. In particular, and without limitation, investors may not be able to assert claims against Arthur Anderson under Section11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, investors would be unable toassert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act because it has not consented to the incorporation by reference of its previously issued report into registration statements filed with the Commission by the Registrant.