alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington, established by the Secretary of the Interior, will hold a public meeting. The purpose of the Conservation Advisory Group is to provide technical advise and counsel to the Secretary of the Interior and Washington State on the structure, implementation, and oversight of the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program.

# DATES:

Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Bureau of Reclamation Office, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. James Esget, Manager, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 98901; 509-575-5848, extension 267.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting will be to review the staff reports requested at the last meeting and provide program oversite. This meeting is open to the public.

Dated: September 21, 2005.

James A. Esget,

Program Manager.

[FR Doc. 05-19826  Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

eGain Communications Corporation 

Mountain View, California 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-129854, 333-76692, 333-76690, 333-76688, 333-41394, and 333-32854) and Form S-3 (No. 333-48314) of eGain Communications Corporation of our report dated September27, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule as of June 30, 2007 and for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

San Francisco, California 

September 26, 2008
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AL E J AN DR A MAL DO NA DO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73389 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 840- 453 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l e j andr aM a l dona do, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h e rap p lic a tio n f o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence 

# FI LED SEP 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73389 2 the a ge nc y ’ s c ont i nuous phy s i c a l pr e s e nc e de t e rm i na t i on, L op ez -A lvarado v. A s h c r o ft , 381 F . 3d 847, 850- 51 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , and w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatM al do nado m ether bu rden t o est abl i sh cont i nu ou s physi ca l pres ence w here she t es t i fi ed on m ore than o n e o c c a s io n th a t s h e e n te r e dth e U n ite dS ta te s in J an u ary1 9 9 6 . See Si ng h-Kau r v . I NS , 18 3 F . 3d 11 47 , 11 50 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( a c on traryre sul ti s notcom pel l ed w here the r e i s “ [ t ] he pos s i bi l i tyof dr aw i ng tw o i nc ons i s t e ntc onc l us i ons f r om the evi dence”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on om i tt ed). M a l dona do’ s due pr oc e s s c ont e nt i on r e gar di ng ac ont i nuanc e i s una va i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Child Interventions Panel.                    

*Date:*                         October 24-25, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The William F. Bolger Center for Leadership Dev., DOLCHE Hotel & Conference Destination, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, MD 20854.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Christopher S. Sarampote, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6148, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1959,                         *csarampo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: September 27, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20233 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4635 

To require lenders of loans with Federal guarantees or Federal insurance 

to consent to mandatory mediation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Ms. FUDGE (for herself, Ms. WATERS, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Ms. SUTTON, 

and Ms. KILROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require lenders of loans with Federal guarantees or 

Federal insurance to consent to mandatory mediation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreclosure Mandatory 

5 Mediation Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4635 IH

1 SEC. 2. MANDATORY MEDIATION. 

2 Title I of the Helping Families Save Their Homes 

3 Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–22; 12 U.S.C. 5201 note) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 106. MANDATORY MEDIATION. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro7 vision of law, before a qualified mortgagee may initiate 

8 a foreclosure proceeding or a sheriff sale, the qualified 

9 mortgagee shall conduct, consistent with any applicable 

10 State or local requirements, a one-time mediation with the 

11 affected mortgagor and a housing counseling agency, at 

12 the expense of the qualified mortgagee. 

13 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

14 ‘‘(1) the term ‘housing counseling agency’ 

15 means— 

16 ‘‘(A) a housing counseling agency certified 

17 by the Secretary under section 106(e) of the 

18 Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 

19 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(e)); or 

20 ‘‘(B) a neighborhood housing services pro21 gram established by the Neighborhood Rein22 vestment Corporation under section 606 of the 

23 Housing and Community Development Amend24 ments of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 8105); and 

25 ‘‘(2) the term ‘qualified mortgagee’ means an 

26 entity— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4635 IH

1 ‘‘(A) that makes a mortgage loan for, or 

2 holds a note secured by, a one- to four-family 

3 residence that is— 

4 ‘‘(i) insured under title II of the Na5 tional Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et 

6 seq.); 

7 ‘‘(ii) guaranteed, insured, or made 

8 under chapter 37 of title 38, United States 

9 Code; 

10 ‘‘(iii) made, guaranteed, or insured 

11 under title V of the Housing Act of 1949 

12 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.); or 

13 ‘‘(iv) eligible for purchase by the Fed14 eral National Mortgage Association or the 

15 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corpora16 tion; or 

17 ‘‘(B) that is acting, or otherwise author18 ized to act, as the mortgagee of record for a 

19 lender, including any entity, such as the Mort20 gage Electronic Registration Systems or 

21 MERS, acting as a nominee for a lender in any 

22 suit brought against a mortgagor.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                                    EXHIBIT A

                         CONFIRMATION OF SUBLEASE TERMS

         It is agreed that the following terms control the Sublease between SWMF
Holdings Corporation, as "Landlord" and Esperion Therapeutics, as "Tenant" for
the Subleased Premises located at the Southwest Michigan Innovation
Center--McCracken Hall on the campus of Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo,
Michigan:

         1.       The Lease Commencement Date is: October 15, 2001;

         2.       The Rooms which are the subject of the Sublease are: 5110,
                  5111, 5090, 5070, 5040, 5041, 5042, 5030, 5010;

         3.       The total square footage of the Subleased Premises is: 3,264;

         4.       The total annual rent is: $40,800;

         5.       The total monthly rent is: $3,400;

         6. The first rent payment is due on October 15, 2001 and shall continue
on the same day of each month thereafter throughout the Lease Term.

Dated Effective: October 15, 2001

TENANT:                                       LANDLORD:
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.                   SWMF Holdings Corporation
----------------------------

/s/ Roger S. Newton                           /s/ Barry Broome
----------------------------                  --------------------------------
By: Roger S. Newton                           By: Barry Broome

Title: Pres/CEO                               Title: Executive Director/CEO
       ---------------------
STATE of North Carolina v. Edwin Christopher LAWING, Defendant.

No. COA17-231

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

NO ERROR.
S eeTex. R. A pp. P. 47. 4. 1 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2 - 08 - 33 6- CV 2- 08 - 34 2- CV I N RE OLSHAN F O UN DA TI O N REP AI R R EL ATO RS COMP ANY , L L C A ND OL S HAN F OUN DAT I ON R E P AI R CO M P ANY OF DA L L AS , L T D.

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d re la t o r s ’ p e t it io n s f o rw r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is oft he opi ni on t hatr el i efs houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or s’ pe t i t i ons f or
w r i t of m andam us ar e deni ed. The st ay of t he t r i al cour t pr oceedi ngs i n cause num ber s 07- 06- 429 an d 07- 06- 435 i n t he 271 stD i st r i ctCour t ofW i se Count y, Texa s ar e h er eby l i f t ed. R el at or s shal l pay al l cost s of t hes e o ri gi nal pr oceedi ngs, f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: GA RD N ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d DA U PH I N O T, J.2

DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r2, 2008
#### Julio MORA, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D03-0883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 2003.

*194Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and motion to declare the issue of extreme importance, which the Court treats as a response to its order of April 9, 2003, the Court has determined that it lacks jurisdiction to review the decision of the Department of Corrections. *See*§ 120.81(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); *see also Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n,*703 So.2d 1202,1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); *Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n,*720 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla.1998). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
#### St. Johns River Acreage, Inc., a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. William A. Hallowes, Sr., *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 25, 1928.

*James P. Hill, Jr.,*and *E. C. Mitchell,*for Appellant;

*James II. Bunch,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the *975respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. concur.
In the MATTER OF LaXavier P. REDDICK-HOOD.

S18Y1038

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: April 18, 2018

Jonathan Winslow Hewett, Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta, for Appellant

LaXavier P. Reddick-Hood, Atlanta, for Appellee

Jessica Oglesby, Clerk, State Bar Disciplinary Board, Anthony B. Askew, Chair, Review Panel, Bridget B. Bagley, Atlanta, for Other Party

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Report of the Review Panel recommending the reinstatement of LaXavier P. Reddick-Hood (State Bar No. 597285) to the practice of law. On October 6, 2014, this Court issued an opinion suspending Reddick-Hood for at least three years and conditioning her reinstatement on: (1) continued and successful participation in the State Bar's Law Practice Management Program; (2) continued participation in counseling; and (3) provision of a detailed, written evaluation of a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist certifying that she is fit to practice law and is mentally competent. See *In the Matter of Reddick-Hood*, 296 Ga. 95, 97-98, 764 S.E.2d 416 (2014). The Court instructed that after three years, if she wished to seek reinstatement, she must file a petition for reinstatement with the Review Panel showing compliance with the conditions, the Review Panel would consider the petition and any objections filed by the State Bar's Office of General Counsel and make a recommendation to this Court, and this Court would thereafter issue an order granting or denying reinstatement. See id. at 98, 764 S.E.2d 416.

*600On January 5, 2018, Reddick-Hood filed a Petition for Reinstatement with the Review Panel. On January 11, 2018, the State Bar's Office of General Counsel filed a response pointing out several deficiencies in the documentation attached to the petition. On January 30, 2018, Reddick-Hood filed an amended petition with additional documentation. On February 5, 2018, the State Bar's Office of General Counsel filed a supplemental response recommending reinstatement. On March 9, 2018, the Review Panel considered this matter, and on April 3, 2018, the Review Panel issued its Report, finding that Reddick-Hood had satisfied the conditions on reinstatement established by this Court and recommending that she be reinstated to the practice of law.

Having reviewed the record, we agree that Reddick-Hood has complied with the conditions on reinstatement. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that LaXavier P. Reddick-Hood be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

*Reinstated.*

All the Justices concur.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mondial  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2007


/s/ Joe Alvaro
---------------------------------------
Joe Alvaro
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**720 CAF 15-01141**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF DOUGLAS C. MACHADO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHANDRA V. TANOURY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

KOSLOSKY & KOSLOSKY, UTICA (WILLIAM L. KOSLOSKY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MICHELE E. DETRAGLIA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered May 5, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Machado v Tanoury ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 30, 2016]).

Entered: September 30, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**HOMEBANC CORP.**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with HomeBanc Corp.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Kevin D. Race, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Date: August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ KEVIN D. RACE                                                |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Kevin D. Race                                                    |
|                 |   | *President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer* |