alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pamela C. BARRETT, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Donald Collins Clements, Jr. v. Nancy COSTON

No. 346P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Wesley A. Collins, Attorney at Law, Morehead City, Russell C. Alexander, Attorney at Law, Samuel Morris-Bloom, Attorney at Law, for Barrett, Pamela C. (Ind. & Ex.).

Arey W. Grady, III, Attorney at Law, New Bern, Ross T. Hardeman, Attorney at Law, for Coston, Nancy.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of October 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30730 Conference Calendar

JEROME KENNON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RICHARD SPINNER ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-185-A

- - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerome Kennon, Louisiana inmate #131818, appeals the dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights suit. Our review of the arguments and the appellate record reveals that, for essentially the same reason as explained in the district court’s order of dismissal, no abuse of discretion resulted by the court’s frivolousness determination. See Kennon v. Spinner , No. 96-185-A-1 (M.D. La. May 23, 1996). For the first time onNo. 96-30730 - 2 - appeal, Kennon asserts that the one-year prescriptive period was tolled by the voluntary dismissal of an earlier suit. We perceive no error, plain or otherwise, by the district court’s failure to detect a tolling of the prescriptive period. See La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 3463 (West 1994). The result of this appeal is obvious, and Kennon’s arguments are without merit. The appeal is frivolous and is thus DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Kennon has been warned of the consequences of bringing frivolous appeals. See Kennon v. United States , No. 95-31175 (5th Cir. Feb. 8, 1996) (unpublished). The warning has gone unheeded. Accordingly, Kennon is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis (IFP), civil appeal in this court without the prior written approval of an active judge of this court. Further he is BARRED from filing any pro se, IFP, civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court are directed to return to Kennon, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
Exhibit 32.3

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P., hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.

Date: February 26, 2010



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                             
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                 
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59355-59356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. ``Review of an Unsolicited P01.''
    Date: October 26, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Cheryl K. Lapham, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of 
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DEA/NIH/DHHS, 6700-B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Room 3127, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-4598, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a69666b7a626b674a64636b636e24646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d4e414c5d454c406d43444c444903434445034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 59356]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20431 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DTH MEDIA CORPORATION, et al. v. FOLT, et al.

142PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 28, 2018

Hugh Stevens, Michael J. Tadych, Attorneys at Law, for DTH Media Corporation, et al.

Stephanie A. Brennan, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Folt, Carol L., et al.

Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, for Victim Rights Organizations.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Victim Rights Organizations for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of December 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Kathy D. CARROLL, Administratrix of the Estate of Edmund Fulton Preslar, Deceased-Employee, Plaintiff, v. Johns MANVILLE, Employer, Travelers Indemnity Co., Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA17-1172

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4651 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4651

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, as the ``Specialist Keith 
                Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST KEITH ERIN GRACE, JR. MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, shall be known as the 
``Specialist Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referenced 
to subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# L_2004241EN.01S00301.xml

| 13.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 30 April 2004 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the 11 official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the 11 pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 May 2004.

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 30 April and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 30 April 2004 | Corrected OJ |
| --- | --- |
| L 139 | L 226 of 25 June |
| L 144 | L 199 of 7 June |
| L 146 | L 225 of 25 June |
| L 149 | L 215 of 16 June |
| L 150 | L 185 of 24 May |
| L 151 | L 208 of 10 June |
| L 152 | L 216 of 16 June |
| L 153 | L 231 of 30 June |
| L 154 | L 189 of 27 May |
| L 155 | L 193 of 1 June |
| L 156 | L 202 of 7 June |
| L 157 | L 195 of 2 June |
| L 158 | L 229 of 29 June |
| L 159 | L 184 of 24 May |
| L 160 | L 212 of 12 June |
| L 161 | L 206 of 9 June |
| L 164 | L 220 of 21 June |
| L 165 | L 191 of 28 May |
| L 166 | L 200 of 7 June |
| L 167 | L 201 of 7 June |

OJ of 30 April 2004

Corrected OJ

L 139

L 226 of 25 June

L 144

L 199 of 7 June

L 146

L 225 of 25 June

L 149

L 215 of 16 June

L 150

L 185 of 24 May

L 151

L 208 of 10 June

L 152

L 216 of 16 June

L 153

L 231 of 30 June

L 154

L 189 of 27 May

L 155

L 193 of 1 June

L 156

L 202 of 7 June

L 157

L 195 of 2 June

L 158

L 229 of 29 June

L 159

L 184 of 24 May

L 160

L 212 of 12 June

L 161

L 206 of 9 June

L 164

L 220 of 21 June

L 165

L 191 of 28 May

L 166

L 200 of 7 June

L 167

L 201 of 7 June

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Otis Redding HOWIE, Jr.

No. 285P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Howie, Otis Redding (Jr.).

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th of September 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Union County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **8 35** 

LEVON MINTZ, a/k/a Lavon Mintz , P etitioner

- Appell ant ,

v. WAYNE C. MCCABE, Warden Lieber Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Joseph F. Anderson , Jr. , District Judge. ( 1 : 11

- cv - 0 1270

- JFA )

Submitted : February 26 , 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Levon Mintz , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka , Senior Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Levon Mintz s eeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling i s debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mintz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny M intz leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motion for leave to remand, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the3 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials bef ore th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Bruce Butcher, P.Eng., and the information that I reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 22nd day of March, 2017.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ Bruce Butcher


Bruce Butcher, P.Eng.
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Mission West Properties, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 4. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 5. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

|   | By: /s/ Carl E. Berg                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Carl E. Berg                           |
|   | Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Lamar CROWDER

No. COA18-185

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2091

LINVAL A. BLAIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLONNAS SHIPYARD, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-1360-2) Submitted: November 16, 1999 Decided: January 4, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linval A. Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Ruth Litvin, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Linval A. Blair appeals the district court’s order grantingsummary judgment to his former employer and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Blair v. Colonnas Shipyard, Inc. , No. CA-98-1360-2 (E.D. Va. July 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2354

STUART J. BYCZYNSKI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-96-1554-WMN)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart J. Byczynski, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

claims of discrimination on the basis of national origin under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to

2000e-17 (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Byczynski v. Apfel,

No. CA-96-1554-WMN (D. Md. August 19, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7669

HENRY GILMORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NURSE STRICKLAND; TINA KINLAW, Head Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-829-5-BR) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Henry Gilmore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gilmore v. Strickland , No. CA-98-829-5-BR (Nov. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-120692), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782), the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211), the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-43267), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592), and the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571) of Liberty Property Trust and Liberty
Property Limited Partnership and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-14139), the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32244), the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-53297), the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-63115), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37218),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45032), the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-62504), the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62506),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63494), the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-63978), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-91702),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107482), the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-108040), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-114609),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-118994), the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-130948), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125572),
and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-122365) of Liberty Property
Trust and in the related Prospectuses and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-118995) pertaining to the Liberty Property Trust Amended and Restated
Share Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liberty Property Trust,
Liberty Property Trust management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Liberty Property Trust, included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2006
EXHIBIT 23.1




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mission West Properties, Inc.
Cupertino, California

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 No.  333-80369  of our reports  dated  January 28,  2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements,  the effectiveness of Mission
West Properties,  Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, and schedule
of Mission West  Properties,  Inc.  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.


\S\BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
March 14, 2005