alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before September 3, 2005. Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St. NW., 8th floor, Washington DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by October 17, 2005. 

John W. Roberts, 

Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program. 

## COLORADO 

## Morgan County 

German Evangelical Immanuel Congregational Church, 209 Everett St., Brush, 05001161 

## MISSOURI 

## Shannon County 

Alton Club, Gravel road, 1.5 mi. W of MO 19 and 12 Mi. N of Eminence, Eminence, 05001162 

## St. Louis Independent City 

Hamilton Place Historic District, 5900-6000 blks of Enright, Cates, and Clemens, St. Louis (Independent City), 05001164 

Measuregraph Company Building, 4245 Forest Park Blvd., St. Louis (Independent City), 05001163 

## OKLAHOMA 

## Cherokee County 

Logan, Leonard M., House, 531 Summit, Tahlequah, 05001165 

## TEXAS 

## Travis County 

West Line Historic District, Roughly bounded by Baylor St., W. Fifth and Sixth Sts., MoPac Expressway, Austin, 05001166 

[FR Doc. 05-19525 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
CLerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station,

Austin,?Texas 78711

December 30, 2014

RE: PD-0113-14; 05-12-00577-CR

Garry Dean Stroner v. State

Dear Clerk of the Court,

I am writing you to request for the date that my Petition for discretionary

review was refused.

Please provide the date=of the ruling on the cause number above. Thank

you for all your help and time within this matter!

Respectful!

(*

GarryH5. Stroner

#01777671-Coffield

2661 FM 2054

Tenn.Colony, Tx. 75884

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CC: file. ..,, , _ nnmr

Jan U5 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Wednesday, October 26, 2005.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-20360  Filed 10-5-05; 2:10 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Order filed August 2, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00109-CR

____________

TYLER GALE WILLBANKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 249917

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and 

conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. art. 38.22 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 
The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate 

the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before September 1, 2022.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Chief Justice Christopher and Justice Wise and Jewell.
STATE of North Carolina v. David Shane BROWN

No. COA17-1271

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING IN PART.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jamarick Yamon HORTON

No. 42P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, for Horton, Jamarick Yamon.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

Kevin G. Mahoney, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th of February 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question *106filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of February 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
#### Josephine Sanders, *Petitioner,*v. The State of Florida, *Respondent.*

En Banc.

Opinion Filed March 1, 1928.

*Zack H. Douglas,*for Petitioner;

No appearance *contra.*

*401Per Curiam.

On writ of certiorari it appears that Josephine Sanders was convicted in the court of the County Judge for Marion County on a charge of being unlawfully in possession of intoxicating liquor. The sentence was six months ’ imprisonment and a fine of three hundred dollars, and upon default in paying the fine and costs, an additional six months’ imprisonment. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the circuit judge. It is certified by the trial judge that the record contains all the evidence adduced at the trial. There is no legal evidence that the small quantity of “liquid” found in the possession of the accused in her home was. intoxicating, therefore, the judgment of conviction should be quashed on certiorari and is so ordered. Haile v. Bullock, 83 Fla. 538, 91 South. Rep. 683.

Judgment quashed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

197 CA 13-00984 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF SUZANNE LOZINAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (EDWARD A. TREVVETT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
RICHARD E. CASAGRANDE, BUFFALO (TIMOTHY CONNICK OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (James H. Dillon, J.), entered March 22, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment, among other things, granted the petition, vacated and annulled the resolution terminating petitioner’s employment and directed respondent to reinstate petitioner.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Sharp, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 574]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, *J.),*rendered December 23, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 9 months, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant acquiesced in the court’s ruling, his claims that he was entitled to a *Mapp*hearing on the issue of whether State action was involved in his seizure by a private security guard and that the court’s summary denial of such a hearing violated the law of the case doctrine in that a hearing had been granted by a prior Justice, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that exceptional circumstances in the form of new information warranted reconsideration of the previous order *(see, People v Delgado,*225 AD2d 478, 479, *lv denied*88 NY2d 983) and that defendant, who did not challenge the People’s explanation of the security guard’s private status, made no factual allegations to warrant a hearing on the issue of State action *(see, People v Valentino,*254 AD2d 185, 186, *lv denied*92 NY2d 1054). Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  | /S/    A. DWIGHT
UTZ                                
|                     |  | A. Dwight Utz                                       
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                     | 
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  | /S/    THOMAS M.
CROWDER                            
|                     |  | Thomas M. Crowder                                   
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Carbon Graphite Group. Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donghai Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May, 16, 2011


/s/ Donghai Yu


Donghai Yu,


Chief Executive Officer
TAYLOR v. WAKE COUNTY

93P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Harvey L. Kennedy, Attorney at Law, Harold L. Kennedy, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Donna M. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Pilot Mountain, for Taylor, LaTonya A.

Roger A. Askew, Senior Deputy County Attorney, Jennifer M. Jones, Senior Assistant County Attorney, for Wake County, d/b/a the Division of Social Services.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of December 2018 by Defendant to Strike Motion for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
In the MATTER OF Claud L. MCIVER, III.

S18Y1161

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: June 4, 2018

Donald Franklin Samuel, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Atlanta, Attorneys for the Appellant.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel, Jenny K. Mittelman, State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta, Attorneys for the Appellee.

Herman Maddox Kilgore, Kilgore & Rodriguez LLC, Marietta, Attorneys for the Other Party.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a petition filed by Claud L. McIver, III (Bar No. 494125) seeking the voluntary suspension of his license to practice law pending the outcome of an appeal of his criminal convictions. See Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2). Because we agree that such a suspension is appropriate, we accept McIver's petition.

On April 23, 2018, following a jury trial, McIver, who has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1973, was found guilty in the Superior Court of Fulton County of felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and influencing a witness. It is a violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to be convicted of a felony; the maximum penalty for such a violation is disbarment. See Bar Rule 4-102 (d) ; Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4 (a) (2). McIver was sentenced to life in prison on May 23, 2018, and has filed a motion for new trial. McIver states that he intends to file a notice of appeal if the motion for new trial is denied, and he agrees to notify the State Bar's Office of General Counsel regarding the outcome of his appeal within 10 days of the final appellate court order. See Bar Rule 4-106 (f). The State Bar responds that it has no objection to McIver's petition.

*54Based on our review of the record, we agree that the petition should be accepted. Accordingly, McIver hereby is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court. He is directed to notify the State Bar of the final disposition of his direct appeal within ten days of that disposition and is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Suspended until further order of this Court.*

All the Justices concur, except Peterson, J., not participating.
STATE of North Carolina v. Clarence Adrian ROYSTER

No. COA17-823

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as amended by this Form 10-K/A (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



COMPANY NAMEBy:

/s/    ERIC N. SMITEric N. SmitOctober 28, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

|1 |  | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EHMANN, et al. v. MEDFLOW, INC., et al.

433A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, for Medflow, Inc., et al.

Harold C. Spears, Christopher P. Raab, Attorneys at Law, for Ehmann, Eugene K., et al.

C. Bailey King, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Medflow, Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of August 2018 by Defendants for Monetary Damages Caused by Frivolous Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Jackson, J. recused
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2687]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

January 19, 2005.
    Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and 
published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document 
is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by February 17, 2005. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Improving Public Safety Communications in 
the 800 MHz Band (WT Docket No. 02-55).
    Consolidating the 800 and 900 MHz Industrial/Land Transportation 
and Business Pool Channels to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile 
and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless 
Services, including Third Generation Wireless Services (ET Docket No. 
00-258).
    Petition for Rulemaking of the Wireless Information Networks Forum 
Concerning the Unlicensed Personal Communications Service (RM-9498).
    Petition for Rulemaking of UT Starcom, Inc. Concerning the 
Unlicensed Personal Communications Service (RM-10024).
    Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate 
Spectrum at 2 GHz for Use by the Mobile Satellite Service (ET Docket 
No. 95-18).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 15.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-1942 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Order entered January 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01063
- CV
DOUBLE DIAMOND
- DELAW ARE, INC., ET AL., Appellant s V. JEANETTE ALFONSO, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 16333



### O RDER So that the Court may determine whether it has jurisdiction over this appeal, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file , no later than January 14, 2018, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of (1) “Certain Defendants’ Verified Second Amended
Answer ; ” (2) “ Double Diamond Defendants’ Second Amended and Supplemental Answer, Verified Plea, Affirmative Defenses , and Count er - Claim ; ” (3) “ Trial Plaintiff’s Notice of Partial
Non

- Suit without Prejudice as to Certain Parties and Claims; ” and , (4) “ Nelia Vicente’s Notice of Partial Nonsuit without Prejudice as to Certain Parties and Claims

. ” If any of these documents cannot be located, Ms. Pitre shall state so in writing. Until the Court determines its jurisdiction, the deadline for filing appellants’ brief is suspended.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the

parties. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE