alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy K
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date: November 17, 2005


/s/ Kathleen P. McSherry
Kathleen P. McSherry
Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Financial
Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Mindy Michelle MORROW

No. COA17-1269

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 No. 333-71651 and No. 333-71653) pertaining to the 1998 Stock 
Incentive Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the registration of 
1,235,224 shares of common stock for options granted pursuant to written 
compensation agreements of Xoom.com, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 1999, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Xoom.com, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  report  of  Entech  Environmental  Technologies,
Inc.(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Burr  D.  Northrop, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                        /s/ Burr D. Northrop
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Burr D. Northrop, President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        Date: March 25, 2005.


<PAGE>
STATE v. Rudolph COLES, Jr.

417P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 26, 2018

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Coles, Rudolph (Jr.)

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of November 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of November 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Neil Wayne HOYLE

No. 239A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Hoyle, Neil Wayne

Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd of August 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rondy VERNON, Sr.

No. 2002-KO-3011.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Vernon, Rondy Sr.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 97CR467763; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2001 KA 2104.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT DEMETRIUS BARNES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00105-WMN; 1:07-cv-00960-WMN) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 19, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Demetrius Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Demetrius Barnes seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barnes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Boss Minerals,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  May 19, 2005


/s/ Alexei Jirniaguine
-----------------------------------------------
Alexei Jirniaguine, Principal Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

271A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 29, 2018

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, Jennifer T. Harrod, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Kiran H. Mehta, Molly Leigh McIntosh, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Duke Energy Progress, LLC.

Matthew D. Quinn, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Sierra Club.

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, Lucy E. Edmondson, Staff Attorney, Raleigh, for Public Staff-N.C. Utilities Commission.

James P. West, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fayetteville Public Works Commission.

Kyle J. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Department of Defense/Federal Executive Agencies.

*520The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 29th of November 2018 to Consolidate Appeals and to Enter Briefing Schedule:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of November 2018."
**Exhibit
      23.1**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (Nos. 333-117047 and 333-57103) of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. of our report
      dated February 21, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial
      statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
      over
      financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New
      York,
      New York


February
      21, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4840 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4840

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Clarence D. 
                         Lumpkin Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2010

 Mr. Tiberi (for himself, Mr. Driehaus, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Turner, Mr. 
Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Ms. Sutton, Mr. LaTourette, Ms. Kilroy, Mr. 
Boccieri, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Space, Mr. Wilson of Ohio, Mr. Austria, 
Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Kucinich, and Ms. Fudge) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Clarence D. 
                         Lumpkin Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARENCE D. LUMPKIN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clarence 
D. Lumpkin Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM A. JORDAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 652 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), John P.Longenecker, Chief Executive Officer of Favrille, Inc. (the “Company”),and Tamara A. Seymour, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

**1.            **The Company’s Quarterly Report  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2008 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “QuarterlyReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

 

**2.**            The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands heretoas of the 11th day of August, 2008.

 
|   | /s/ John P. Longenecker     |   | /s/ Tamara A. Seymour   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | John P. Longenecker,  Ph.D. |   | Tamara A. Seymour       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of Favrille, Inc. under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Power
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the
Treasurer and principal financial officer of the Company hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Power
Technology, Inc.

Dated: May 28, 2004


                                    By:  /s/ Lee A. Balak
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Lee A. Balak
                                         Chief Executive Officer, President and
                                         Principal Financial and Accounting
                                         Officer



                                       23
STATE of North Carolina v. Carico Rodriquez HAYWARD

No. COA18-650

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>



        Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-62725) pertaining to the registration of 400,000 shares of
Common Stock in the Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, (2) the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62727) pertaining to the registration
of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock under Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc. 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (3) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-62731) pertaining to the registration of 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock
under Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, (4) the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67475) pertaining to the registration
of 1,289,329 shares of Common Stock of Insignia Financial Group, Inc.(f/k/a
Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.) under the Richard Ellis Group Limited 1997
Unapproved Share Option Scheme, (5) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-77353) of Insignia Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.)
pertaining to the registration of 611,962 shares of Common Stock of Insignia
Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.) under the St. Quintin
Holdings Limited 1999 Unapproved Share Option Scheme, (6) the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78639) of Insignia Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a
Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.) under the Insignia Financial Group, Inc. 401(k)
Restoration Plan, (7) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88371)
pertaining to the registration of 105,686 shares of Common Stock of Insignia
Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.) under the
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements (8) the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-41162) of Insignia Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Insignia/ESG Holdings,
Inc.) pertaining to the registration of 1,493,000 shares of Common Stock of
Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and (9) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333- 55752) of Insignia Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Insignia/ESG Holdings,
Inc.) pertaining to the registration of 110,000 shares of Common Stock of
Insignia Financial Group, Inc. under the Brooke International (China) Limited
Share Option Scheme, of our report dated February 8, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Insignia Financial Group, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 20, 2002
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-11529

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:14-cv-60347-WPD

DELVIN MCKINNEY, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

 versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(June 26, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Delvin McKinney was convicted of six drug-trafficking offenses, which 

Case: 14-11529 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

included distributing cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and playground area. 

On July 21, 2005, the District Court sentenced McKinney to concurrent prison

terms of life imprisonment on one count and 360 months on the remaining counts, 

and imposed a special assessment of $600 ($100 on each count). McKinney 

appealed his convictions, and we affirmed. United States v. McKinney, 219 F. 

App’x. 921 (11th Cir. 2007).1

 On February 22, 2008, McKinney filed a motion for 

a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and requested an evidentiary

hearing. The District Court denied McKinney’s motion. And, on February 17, 

2009, we affirmed the District Court’s decision. United States v. McKinney, 312 F. 

App’x. 247 (11th Cir. 2009).

On March 5, 2008, McKinney moved the District Court to vacate his 

convictions and sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court denied 

the motion on May 6, 2008. And, on April 6, 2009, we denied a certificate of 

appealability. On January 27, 2014, McKinney moved the District Court for leave 

to amend the motion he filed on March 5, 2008. The District Court denied the 

motion on January 30, 2014, as an attempt to file a successive § 2255 motion 

without obtaining leave of the Court of Appeals. McKinney now appeals from that 

decision.

The District Court was correct that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain 

 1 While his appeal was pending, McKinney filed several motions for a new trial. All were 

denied.

Case: 14-11529 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

McKinney’s successive § 2255 motion. To file such a motion in the District Court, 

McKinney must first obtain leave of this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-11529 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald H. Miller, Chief Executive Officer ofAventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retainedby Aventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Ronald H. Miller    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Ronald  H. Miller        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | August 7,  2008     |

 

1

----