alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of DaimlerChrysler AG (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Juergen E. Schrempp, as
Chairman of the Board of Management of the Company, and Dr. Manfred Gentz, as
Member of the Board of Management, Finance & Controlling, of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JUERGEN E. SCHREMPP
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Juergen E. Schrempp
Title: Chairman of the Board of Management
Date:  February 20, 2003


/s/ DR. MANFRED GENTZ
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Dr. Manfred Gentz
Title: Member of the Board of Management
       Finance & Controlling
Date:  February 20, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN the INTEREST OF S. M.

A18A1221

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

July 24, 2018

Katherine Morgan Mason, Amanda Helene Monaco, for Appellant.

Joshua Bradley Smith, Augusta, Henry Wayne Syms Jr., for Appellee.

Rickman, Judge.

The district attorney for the Augusta Judicial Circuit filed a delinquency petition in the Juvenile Court of Richmond County, alleging that S. M. was delinquent for committing the act of theft by taking, a misdemeanor, in that S. M took a cell phone with a value of $1,500 or less from its owner with the intention of depriving the owner of the property. After initially denying the allegations, S. M., who was represented by counsel, formally admitted the allegations and agreed to an informal adjustment of the matter that included restitution to the victim for the lost phone. Thereafter, the court held a hearing on the amount of restitution, during which the State presented evidence on that topic. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court determined that restitution should be set at $750. The court entered an order for the informal adjustment, *691including restitution in that amount, and S. M. appealed from that order, challenging, for various reasons, only the amount of the restitution ordered. The State, however, argues that the appeal should be dismissed. We agree.

An informal adjustment is a "disposition of a case other than by formal adjudication and disposition." OCGA § 15-11-2 (39).1 Generally, an informal adjustment holds all charges in abeyance pending completion of certain conditions in a certain period of time; upon successful completion all charges will be dismissed. See *In Interest of M. T.* , 223 Ga. App. 615, 616, 478 S.E.2d 428 (1996). Here, the court's order provides for S. M.'s informal adjustment for a period of 90 days. The order further provides that

> This order will not expire until such time as all conditions are met. Any violations of the conditions herein will result in the matter being set on the Court's calendar for a final disposition.

Thus, the order on appeal did not render a final judgment of adjudication and disposition. See *In Interest of J. S. A.* , --- Ga. App. ----, 816 S.E.2d 399, 2018 WL 3045657 (Case No. A18A0328, decided June 20, 2018) ; *In the Interest of M. T.* , 223 Ga. App. at 616, 478 S.E.2d 428. Because "the order appealed from is not the final judgment to be entered in the case by any court in Georgia, this appeal is premature, and the case must be dismissed without prejudice. [S. M.] is expressly granted permission to file a direct appeal from any subsequent final judgment." *In Interest of M. T.* , 223 Ga. App. at 616, 478 S.E.2d 428.

*Appeal dismissed.*

McFadden, P. J., and Ray, J., concur.

1

In order to proceed with an informal adjustment the child and his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian must consent to the adjustment with knowledge that consent is not obligatory. See OCGA § 15-11-515 (a) (3).
STATE v. Aaron Lee GORDON

312P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 2018

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Gordon, Aaron Lee

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of September 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of September 2018."
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-K**I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financialofficer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Cellular Corporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Power Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard J. Walter,
      Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      July 2, 2007


By: /s/
      Bernard J. Walter


Bernard
      J. Walter


Chief
      Executive Officer, President and


Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O

. P D

- 0 3 0 6

- 1 4

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

v
.

D A V I D V I L L A R R E A L , A p p e l l e e

O N S T A T E ’ S M O T I O N F O R R E H E A R I N G
A F T E R O P I N I O N O N D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W
F R O M T H E T H I R T E E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

N U E C E S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m
. M E Y E R S , J

. , f i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n
. R I C H A R D S O N , J

. , f i l e d a

c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n
. N E W E L L , J

. , f i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n
. K E A S L E R , J

. , f i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h H E R V E Y , J

. , j o i n e d

. Y E A R Y , J

. , f i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h K E L L E R , P

. J

. , j o i n e d

.

O P I N I O N

H a v i n g g r a n t e d t h e S t a t e ’ s m o t i o n f o r r e h e a r i n g i n t h i s c a s e , a n d h a v i n g c o n s i d e r e d

i t s m e r i t s , w e n o w c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e S t a t e ’ s m o t i o n w a s i m p r o v i d e n t l y g r a n t e d

. W e d e n y t h e

S t a t e ’ s m o t i o n f

o r r e h e a r i n g

. N o f

u r t h e r m o t i o n s f

o r r e h e a r i n g w i l l b e e n t e r t a i n e d

.

D e l i v e r e d : D e c e m b e r 1 6

, 2 0 1 5Villarre al - 2

P u b l i s h
EXHIBIT 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Companies

|Subsidiary                                 |  | Jurisdiction 
|------------------------------------------ |  | -------------
|Simon Property Group, L.P.                 |  | Delaware     
|SPG Realty Consultants, L.P.               |  | Delaware     
|The Retail Property Trust                  |  | Massachusetts
|Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.      |  | Illinois     
|Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.         |  | Texas        
|Shopping Center Associates                 |  | New York     
|DeBartolo Capital Partnership              |  | Delaware     
|Simon Capital Limited Partnership          |  | Delaware     
|SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.              |  | Delaware     
|M.S. Management Associates, Inc.           |  | Delaware     
|M.S. Management Associates (Indiana), Inc. |  | Indiana      
|DeBartolo Properties Management, Inc.      |  | Ohio         
|Mayflower Realty LLC                       |  | Delaware     
|Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.                   |  | Bermuda      
|Marigold Indemnity, Ltd.                   |  | Delaware     
|Simon Business Network, LLC                |  | Delaware     
|Simon Brand Ventures, LLC                  |  | Delaware     

Omits
names of subsidiaries which as of December 31, 2001 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary".

114

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     1999             1998             1997             1996             1995
                                                 ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------

<S>                                              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Net Income .................................     $        744     $        450     $      1,097     $        863     $        575
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
(excluding Treasury Stock)--Basic
   Class A .................................      190,689,656       37,283,059               --               --               --
   Class B .................................      436,543,573      436,543,573      436,543,573      436,543,573      436,543,573
                                                 ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------
       Total Basic .........................      627,233,229      473,826,632      436,543,573      436,543,573      436,543,573

Shares assumed to be issued due
to stock options ...........................        9,241,896        1,659,816               --               --               --
                                                 ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------
Adjusted average number of Class A
and Class B common shares and share
equivalent-Diluted .........................      636,475,125      475,486,448      436,543,573      436,543,573      436,543,573

Earnings per share:*
   - Basic .................................     $       1.19     $        .95     $       2.51     $       1.98     $       1.32
   - Diluted ...............................     $       1.17     $        .95     $       2.51     $       1.98     $       1.32
</TABLE>


    *Earnings per share (EPS) for the periods prior to the Offerings was
     calculated using only Class B common stock as required by SFAS No. 128.
STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas Nathaniel CAULEY

No. 331P01-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Nicholas Nathaniel Cauley, for Cauley, Nicholas Nathaniel.

R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of August 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
MARTIN v. SLAGEL

210P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 4, 2018

Michael T. Wood, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Dale P. Martin, for Martin, Dale Patrick.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of October 2018 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of October 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Keith HOBSON

No. 320P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Lisa S. Costner, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, for Hobson, Jeffrey Keith.

Stuart M. Saunders, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of September 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


EarthScope Science and Education Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: EarthScope Science and Education Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>16638).
    Dates/Time: 12:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.--Thursday, October 27, 2005. 
8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.--Friday October 28, 2005.
    Place: EarthScope Facility Office, 1200 New York Avenue, NW., 
Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kaye Shedlock, Program Director, EarthScope 
Program, Division of Earth Sciences, Room 785, National Science 
Foundation, Arlington, VA, (703) 292-4693.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed below.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research, education and outreach in the 
EarthScope Program.
    Agenda: To provide advice on EarthScope Program measures of 
success, education and outreach plans, webpage development and other 
program issues.

    Dated: October 4, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-20274 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4651 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4651

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
     monuments in Utah except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

   Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself and Mr. Chaffetz) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
     monuments in Utah except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN UTAH.

    This proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act 
of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Utah'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy K
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:   February 23, 2007

    /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
  Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry

 Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
         (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130316 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130316 COA: 256561 Muskegon CC: 02-048280-FH STERLING BROADEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Larison, Jr., President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 14, 2005   /s/ Robert J. Larison, Jr.   Robert J. Larison, Jr.  President and Chief Executive Officer