alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,723-02
MATTHEW TE RRY BLACK BURN, Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1089999-A IN THE 176TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for le ave to f ile an applica

tion for a writ of m andamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 176th District Court of Har ris County on Fe bruar

y 23, 2015. The District Court enter ed an order desig nating issues on Marc h 30, 2015. More than 180 day s has passed since the date the State
rec eived the ap p l i cation on Fe bruar y 24, 2015, and the application has not been timely forwa rded to this C ourt as mandated by Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 73.4(b)( 5). Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habeas corp u s ap plication, submitt ing proof of the date of-2-

rec eipt by the State showing 1 80 day s has not y et elapse d, or stating that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ris County
. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: F ebrua

ry 3, 2016 Do not publish
#### LEE ALAN BRYANT HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, INC., Appellant-Plaintiff, v. John HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Family and Social Services Administration, Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Disability, Aging and Rehabilitative Services, and Robert Hornyak, Acting Director Residential Care Assistance Program, Appellees-Defendants.

No. 61A04-0210-CV-516.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Aug. 12, 2003.

*230Janet A. MecSharar, Thomas E. Schulte, Harrison & Moberly, LLP., Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Ellen H. Meilaender, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION ON REHEARING

BROOK, Chief Judge.

In its petition for rehearing, Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc. ("Bryant Health Care"), contends that in our original opinion, we incorrectly assumed that the Division of Disability and Rehabilitative Services ("DDARS") is unable to fund all eligible applicants for the Residential Care Assistance Program See Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities Inc. v. Hamilton, 788 N.E.2d 495 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). Bryant Health Care contends that DDARS designated no evidence that it would be unable to provide assistance to every eligible RCAP applicant. We grant rehearing for the limited purpose of addressing Bryant Health Care's contention.

In support of its motion for summary judgment, DDARS designated undisputed evidence of a projected budgetary shortfall for RCAP. As we explained in our original opinion, absent a statutory mandate to fund all eligible RCAP applicants, DDARS is under no legal obligation to do so. Id. at 501; cf. Center Township v. Coe, 572 N.E.2d 1350 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). Although Indiana Code 12-10-6 prohibits DDARS from creating a waiting list of RCAP applicants, it does not prohibit DDARS from disbursing its RCAP appropriation at its discretion. We therefore leave the disbursement of RCAP funds to DDARS's discretion. See State Bd. of Fin. v. Marion County Superior CL, 272 Ind. 47, 49, 896 N.E.2d 340, 348 (1979) ("Even though courts do have the authori*231ty to compel public officials to act where there is a clear legal duty to perform, they cannot compel exercise of a discretionary act in any particular manner.").

NAJAM and BAILEY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William M. Pierce, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and
            results of operations.


Date: May 6, 2005                      /s/ William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       --------------------------
                                       William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer


<PAGE>  21
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-5245 September Term, 2023 1: 23-c v -025 22-UNA Filed O n: April 4, 202 4 Danilo A ugusto Feliciano , also kno w n a s Danil Ezekiel Fau st,

App ellant
v . Merrick B. Garlan d, Attorn ey Gene ral of the United Sta tes,

App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas, Ra o, a nd Garcia, Circuit Judges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Oct obe r 17, 20 23 orde r dism issing the ca se for lack o f jurisdiction be af

f irmed . A s to app ellant ’s request for a w rit of m and am us, h e h as n ot id ent if ied a ny error in the district co urt’s dism issal for lack of subject m atte r jurisdiction b ecau se h e h as failed to sh ow that t he Atto rney Gene ral has a clea r duty

to act. Se e Illino is v . Ferriero, 6 0 F.4 th 7 04, 71 5 (D.C. Cir. 20 23); see also He ckler v . Cha ney, 47 0 U.S . 82 1, 8 31-3 2, 8 38 (198 5) (hold ing thata d ecision w het her t o inst itute en forcem entproce edin gs is “g ene rally com mitt ed to a n a gency’ s abso lute discretion ”). As to ap pellan t’s requests for relief un der t he Adm inistrative Proced ure A ct an d th e Decla ratory Judgme nt A ct, a ppe llant h as failed to e stab lish his stan ding to sue. Se e L ujan v. Defs. of W ildlife , 50 4 U.S . 55 5, 5 73-7 4 (19 92) (“[A] plaint if f raising only a gene rally available griev ance ab outgov ernm ent– cla iming on ly harm to his an d e v ery

citiz en’s in terestin p rope r app lication of the Const itution an d laws, an d se eking relief tha t no m ore d irectly

an d ta ngibly

be nef its him tha n it d oes the pub lic at large –do es n ot st ate an Article II I case or co ntroversy .”); see also L ance v. Cof f ma n, 5 49 U.S. 4 37, 44 2 (20 07) (pe r curiam ) (vote rs’ allegations tha t sta te h ad not followed the Elect ions Clau se d id no t am oun t to pa rticulariz ed injury ).

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-5245 September Term, 2023

Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Achievers Magazine Inc. (the Company) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended OCtober 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 6, 2007



/s/ Arto Tavukciyan

Arto Tavukciyan

Principal Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4705 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $50 Federal 

reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald Wilson 

Reagan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. GALLEGLY, Ms. 

GRANGER, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. WAMP, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the 

face of $50 Federal reserve notes so as to include a 

likeness of President Ronald Wilson Reagan, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President Ronald 

5 Reagan $50 Bill Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4705 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF PRESIDENT REAGAN REQUIRED TO 

2 BE INCLUDED ON THE FACE OF $50 FEDERAL 

3 RESERVE NOTES. 

4 The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the 

5 Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The face of 

7 $50 Federal reserve notes printed after December 31, 

8 2010, shall bear the likeness of President Ronald Wilson 

9 Reagan.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Emilio VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D03-899.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 10, 2003.

*1118Emilio Vazquez, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The denial of unemployment compensation benefits below is affirmed because the record before the appeals referee amply supports the conclusion that the claimant voluntarily quit his position without good cause attributable to the employer.
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

267P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2018

John R. Wester, Adam K. Doerr, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Erik R. Zimmerman, Morgan P. Abbott, Chapel Hill, Attorneys at Law, for Cooper, Roy A.

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, for North Carolina Bipartisan Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Caroline P. Mackie, Raleigh, John Michael Durnovich, Wendy R. Weiser, Daniel I. Weiner, Douglas E. Keith, Attorneys at Law, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Democracy North Carolina

Daniel F.E. Smith, Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, Attorneys at Law, for Hon. James G. Martin, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, for NC Professors of Constitutional Law *591The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of August 2018 by Plaintiff to Suspend Appellate Rules:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Jarrod W. WILLIS

No. 127P13-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jarrod W. Willis, for Willis, Jarrod W.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of July 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of July 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

*287"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the
Company) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |                       
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|By:                                                  |  | /s/ Thomas E. Gottwald
|Thomas E. Gottwald                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2007
# Official Journal C 221A/3 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 221A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 473 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 221A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 473 September 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market |
| 2004/C 221A/1 | Vacancy notice for three posts of chairperson of the boards of appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs) VEXT/04/520/A*/BoA, VEXT/04/521/A*/BoA, VEXT/04/522/A*/BoA | 1 |
| 2004/C 221A/2 | Selection procedure for drawing up a reserve list for posts of member of the boards of appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs) VEXT/04/523/A*/BoA | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market

2004/C 221A/1

Vacancy notice for three posts of chairperson of the boards of appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs) VEXT/04/520/A*/BoA, VEXT/04/521/A*/BoA, VEXT/04/522/A*/BoA

1

2004/C 221A/2

Selection procedure for drawing up a reserve list for posts of member of the boards of appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs) VEXT/04/523/A*/BoA

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.11
















CONSENT OF JÉRÔME LAVOIE







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Jérôme Lavoie, participated in the preparation of the technical report entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2012 Prospecting Program, Lac Pau Project, Québec”, completed in October 2012 (the “Report”), concerning mineralized material in the Lac Pau property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.3.4 Geological Setting; 3.3.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.3.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,













			
	/S/ Jérôme Lavoie

	 
	 

	Name:

Jérôme Lavoie, M.Sc., P.Eng.

	 
	 









May 13, 2013
#### Russell Kramer, Appellant, v Edenwald Construction Company et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[720 NYS2d 339]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about December 14, 1999, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff fails to show a reasonable excuse for his delay in prosecuting this now 13-year-old case which would warrant its restoration to the calendar *(see, Todd Co. v Birnbaum,*182 AD2d 505, 506), nor was there a sufficient showing of merit and lack of prejudice to defendant. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Andrias, Wallach, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ELIAJAH FLEMING, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 140 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kwok Chung Lit, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      April 15, 2010
              
              /s/
      Kwok Chung LitKwok
      Chung LitChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Cynthia Dubose, Respondent. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 854]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about September 2, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application pursuant to Insurance Law § 5208 (b) for leave to file with respondent MVAIC a late affidavit claiming injuries sustained while a passenger in an uninsured taxi cab, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The application was properly granted upon a showing that it was made within 31 days after a diligent investigation revealed that the police accident report contained false information with respect to the identification of the taxi in question. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kindrick Jarod PAYNE

No. 182P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Payne, Kindrick Jarod.

Michael E. Bulleri, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of June 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of June 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on or after October 1, 2005 will be increased. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 1, 2005 and applies to major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James A. Walke, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Response and Recovery Directorate Policy No. 9122.1 provides that FEMA will adjust the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program to reflect annual changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor. 

FEMA gives notice of an increase in the countywide per capita impact indicator to $2.94 for all disasters declared on or after October 1, 2005. 

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 3.6 percent for the 12-month period ended in August 2005. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on September 15, 2005. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public Assistance Grants.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-20293 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P