alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4746 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent pending tax 

increases, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2010 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent 

pending tax increases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EGTRRA, JGTRRA, AND CERTAIN OTHER TAX 

4 RELIEF MADE PERMANENT. 

5 (a) ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TAX RELIEF REC6 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2001.—Title IX of the Economic 

7 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is here8 by repealed. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4746 IH

1 (b) INCOME TAX RATES ON DIVIDENDS AND NET

2 CAPITAL GAIN.—Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax 

3 Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 is hereby repealed. 

4 (c) DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL SALES

5 TAXES.—Paragraph (5) of section 164(b) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara7 graph (I). 

8 (d) DEDUCTION FOR TUITION AND RELATED EX9 PENSES.—Section 222 of such Code is amended by strik10 ing subsection (e). 

11 (e) INCREASED EXPENSING FOR SMALL BUSI12 NESS.— 

13 (1) DOLLAR LIMITATION.—Paragraph (1) of 

14 section 179(b) of such Code (relating to dollar limi15 tation) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000 ($125,000 

16 in the case of taxable years beginning after 2006 

17 and before 2011)’’ and inserting ‘‘$125,000’’. 

18 (2) INCREASE IN QUALIFYING INVESTMENT AT

19 WHICH PHASEOUT BEGINS.—Paragraph (2) of sec20 tion 179(b) of such Code (relating to reduction in 

21 limitation) is amended by striking ‘‘$200,000 

22 ($500,000 in the case of taxable years beginning 

23 after 2006 and before 2011)’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘$500,000’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4746 IH

1 (3) INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 

2 179(b)(5)(A) of such Code (relating to inflation ad3 justments) is amended by striking ‘‘and before 

4 2011’’. 

5 (4) REVOCATION OF ELECTION.—Section 

6 179(c)(2) of such Code (relating to election irrev7 ocable) is amended by striking ‘‘and before 2011’’. 

8 (5) COMPUTER SOFTWARE.—Clause (ii) of sec9 tion 179(d)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘and before 2011’’. 

11 (f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE DEMETRIO PINEDA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00 142

- C R

Appeal from the

1 09 th District Court

of Winkler C ounty, Texas

(TC# 5462 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until February 3 , 202 2

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. M. Michele Rogers

, the Appell ant ’s attorney, prepare

the Appell ant ’s brief and forward t he same to this Court on or before February 3 , 202 2

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 th day o f January , 202 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox , and Alley , JJ.
DE LUCA, et al. v. STEIN, et al.

339A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2019

Paul Stam, Attorney at Law, Apex, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education.

Amy O'Neal, Attorney at Law, for De Luca, Francis X., et al.

Jennie Wilhelm Hauser, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Mary MacLean Asbill, Attorney at Law, Brooks Rainey Pearson, Attorney at Law, Blakely E. Hildebrand, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Coastal Federation, et al.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for Stein, Josh (Attorney General).

Lindsey Vance Smith, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Allison Schafter, Attorney at Law, for NC School Boards Association.

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy.

R. Daniel Gibson, Attorney at Law, for The New Hanover County Board Of Education.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of February 2019 by Defendant and Intervenors to Designate Parties:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2019."
Theodore CREED, Plaintiff, v. Wiiliam CREED, Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., Essentia Insurance Company, and Owners Insurance Company, Defendants.

No. COA17-456

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 13.2 

 

CERTIFICATION OF JOHN ASTON PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc (the “Company”) for the period ending September30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Aston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atthe dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Date: September 19,2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon LEE

No. 356P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Mr. Brandon Lee, for Lee, Brandon.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Raleigh, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Morgan, J.

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of October 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald H. Miller, Chief Executive Officer ofAventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retainedby Aventine RenewableEnergy Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Ronald H. Miller    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Ronald  H. Miller        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | May 11,  2009       |

 

1

----
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Denia Enterprises Inc.(the "Company")
on  Form 10-QSB  for  the   period   ended   July 31, 2006   as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on the   date   hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities    and on the   dates   indicated below,   hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 22, 2006


/s/ Elena Ilina
-----------------------------------------------
Elena Ilina, Principal Financial Officer
In the MATTER OF the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed By Bruce J. ADAMS Dated December 28, 2004 and Recorded in Book 18194 At Page 265 in the Mecklenburg County Public Registry, North Carolina

No. 78P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mr. Jonathan B. Davis, Attorney at Law, Snow Hill, for Bank of New York.

Ms. Tamara R. Cornish, Attorney at Law, for Cornish Law, PLLC.

Ms. Erin Rozzelle, Attorney at Law, for Adams, Bruce J.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of March 2017 by Appellant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant on the 13th of March 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th of March 2017 by Appellant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            August
      12, 2008
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 4215** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHRISTOPHER D. TAVENNER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge . ( 1:09

- cr - 00530

- CMH

- 1 )

Submitted : October 6 , 2010 Decided: November 16, 2010

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opin ion

.
Michael S. N achmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Brian L. Mizer, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Jason H. Poole, Special Assistant United States At torney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher D. Tavenner appeals his conviction for one count of possession of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 844 (2006). H e claims the magistrate judge erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search as an incident to a lawful arrest. Finding no error, we affirm. This c ourt reviews the factual findings underlying the denial of a motion to supp ress for clear error and the legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Johnson , 400 F.3d 187, 193 (4th Cir. 2005 )
. The evidence is construed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. United States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Ci r. 1998). Probable cause to arrest is defined as: facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge that are sufficient to warrant a prudent person, or one of reasonable caution, in believing, in the circumstances shown, that the suspect has commit ted, is committing, or is about to commit an offense. The evidence needed to establish probable cause is more than a mere suspicion, rumor, or strong reason to suspect but less than evidence sufficient to convict. United States v. Williams , 10 F.3d 1070 , 1073

- 74 (4th Cir. 1994) (internal quotations and citations omitted). “[T] he district court is entitled to respect the inferences drawn by officers from their ‘ own experience in deciding whether probable cause exists. ’ ” United States v. White , 549 F.3d 946, 951 (4th Cir.3 2008) (quoting Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 700 (1996)). We conclude that the facts, as found by the magistrate judge and affirmed by the district court, support the finding that there was probable cause for the arrest. Acc ordingly, we affirm the judgment because the search was a lawful search as an incident to the arrest. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. James Daniel WEST, Defendant.

No. COA18-242

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the quarterly report of ERICO International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to such officer’sknowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and forthe periods expressed in the Report.       Date: May 9, 2006               By: /s/ William H. Roj           Name: William H. Roj    Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer      and Director           By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber           Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber    Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
uc_alfek5 

Douglas 

' J. , J. 

the first case." Weddell v. Sharp, 131 Nev., Adv. Op. 28, 350 P.3d 80, 85 

(2015). The record reveals that the parties to this suit were parties to 

Sandoval's prior suit. Sandoval concedes that there was a final judgment 

in the prior suit, as the district court granted summary judgment. 

Sandoval also concedes that this suit arises out of the same September 15, 

2011, incident as his prior suit. Sandoval could have raised these tort 

claims in the first suit. See Alcantara v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 130 Nev., 

Adv. Op. 28, 321 P.3d 912, 915 (2014) ("[A]ll claims based on the same 

facts and alleged wrongful conduct that were or could have been brought 

in the first proceeding are subject to claim preclusion." (internal quotation 

marks omitted)). Sandoval argues that there was no final judgment on his 

state law claims; however, claim preclusion does not require that each 

claim is "actually and necessarily litigated," only that they arose from the 

same facts and could have been brought initially. Five Star Capital Corp., 

124 Nev. at 1054-55, 194 P.3d at 713. Thus, we conclude that claim 

preclusion properly applies to Sandoval's claims and that the district court 

did not err. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

Victor Sandoval 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0)1947A citiefo,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. “Review of an Unsolicited P01.”                    

*Date:*                         October 26, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cheryl K. Lapham, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DEA/NIH/DHHS, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Room 3127, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-4598,                         *clapham@niaid.nih.gov.*
      ( print page 59356)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 3, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20431 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 20, 2009   /s/ Mark L. Kay Mark L. Kay Chief Executive Officer
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 24, 1998


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1998-4


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 1998-4, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv Q76