alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<CIK>        1067700
<NAME>       R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.000
<CASH>                                              2,078
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      56,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (3,303)
<INVENTORY>                                        62,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  126,976
<PP&E>                                             47,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (9,109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    278,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              80,594
<BONDS>                                           120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                         37,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      278,789
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  510,563
<CGS>                                             385,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     500,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  115,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 14,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1,399)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3,626)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

             CERTIFICATION OF JOHN ASTON PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Cambridge Antibody
Technology Group plc (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John Aston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

                                                          Date: October 14, 2003


                                          /s/ John Aston
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Name: John Aston
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) by China Carbon Graphite Group, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Donghai Yu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Ting Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Donghai YuDonghai Yu

Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ Ting ChenTing Chen

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished upon request.
STATE v. Jonathan E. BRUNSON

247P16-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Jonathan Eugene Brunson, for Brunson, Jonathan Eugene.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of October 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter WNT L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/            Walter Davis





Name:                   Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4713 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4713

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the first-time 
 homebuyer credit in the case of joint returns of long-time residents 
     where only 1 spouse meets the ownership and use requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2010

 Ms. Moore of Wisconsin (for herself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, and 
Mr. Loebsack) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the first-time 
 homebuyer credit in the case of joint returns of long-time residents 
     where only 1 spouse meets the ownership and use requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT FOR MARRIED LONG-
              TIME RESIDENTS WHERE ONLY 1 SPOUSE MEETS THE OWNERSHIP 
              AND USE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Special Rule for Married Spouses.--Paragraph (6) of section 
36(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 
end the following new sentence: ``In the case of a joint return where 
only 1 spouse meets the ownership and use requirements of the preceding 
sentence with respect to such same residence, such spouse shall be 
treated as a first-time homebuyer for purposes of this section with 
respect to the purchase of such subsequent residence.''.
    (b) Dollar Limitation.--Subparagraph (D) of section 36(b)(1) of 
such Code is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, except that in the case of a joint returned described in 
the second sentence of subsection (c)(6), subparagraphs (B) and (C) 
shall not apply and subparagraph (A) shall be applied by substituting 
`$3,250' for `$8,000'.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) 
of section 11 of the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act 
of 2009.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

         AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of September 15, 1999, to WARRANT AGREEMENT
dated as of September 15, 1998 (the "Original Agreement") between Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Insignia/ESG
Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"), and APTS Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership ("APTS"), providing for the issuance of warrants to purchase 293,333
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation.

         WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain letter agreement dated the date
hereof, the Corporation and APTS desire to shorten the Expiration Date (as
defined in the Original Agreement) of the Warrants provided for in the Original
Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Original
Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         2. The Expiration Date of the Warrants is hereby shortened from January
17, 2002 to August 1, 2000.

         3. Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Original Agreement
is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

         4. Any Warrant Certificate evidencing Warrants need not be amended to
reflect the change in Expiration Date provided for herein in order to give full
effect to such change.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1
to the Original Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and
duly authorized officers, as of the date and year first above written.

                                 INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                 By: /s/ Adam B. Gilbert
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Adam B. Gilbert
                                     Title: Executive Vice President

                                 APTS PARTNERS, L.P.

                                 By: APTS GP Partners, L.P., its general partner
                                 By: APTS Acquisition Corporation, its general
                                       partner

                                 By: /s/ John R. S. Jacobsson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  John R. S. Jacobsson
                                     Title: Vice President
Opinion issued December 14, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00710-CV

———————————

SUDERMAN CONTRACTING STEVEDORES, INC. AND GEORGE 

ALDRIDGE, Appellants

V.

VICTOR FERRUFINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-13498

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Suderman Contracting Stevedores, Inc. and George Aldridge, and 

appellee, Victor Ferrufino, have filed a “Joint Motion to Set Aside the Trial Court’s

Judgment and to Remand the Cause to the Trial Court for Entry of a Take-Nothing 

Judgment.” The parties state that they have settled the case and have agreed to move 
2

to set aside the trial court’s judgment in this case, remand for rendition of judgment 

in accordance with the parties’ agreement, with appellate costs to be taxed against 

the party incurring the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), (d). No other party 

has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the joint motion, set aside the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits, remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of takenothing judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement, and dismiss 

this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(e). We sua sponte direct the 

Clerk to issue the mandate within ten days of this opinion. See id. 18.1(c). We 

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Lloyd.
Exhibit 13.1  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Daimler AG (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dr. Dieter Zetsche, as
Chairman of the Board of Management of the Company, and Bodo Uebber, as Member
of the Board of Management, Finance & Controlling / Financial Services,
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.   /s/ Dieter ZetscheName:
  Dr. Dieter ZetscheTitle:
  Chairman of the Board
  of Management / Head of Mercedes-Benz CarsDate:
  March 3, 2010/s/ Bodo UebberName:
  Bodo UebberTitle:
  Member of the Board of
  ManagementFinance &
  Controlling / Daimler Financial ServicesDate:
  March 3, 2010
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT
              ----------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 
DaimlerChrysler AG:

The audits of DaimlerChrysler AG and subsidiaries (DaimlerChrysler) referred to
in our qualified report dated March 15, 1999, included the related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1998, as contained in the DaimlerChrysler Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 1998. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of DaimlerChrysler's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

Our auditors' report referred to above contains a qualification as a result of a
departure from United States generally accepted accounting principles for
DaimlerChrysler's accounting for certain joint ventures in accordance with the
proportionate method of consolidation. In our opinion, United States generally
accepted accounting principles require that such joint ventures be accounted for
using the equity method of accounting.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on 
Form F-3 (Nos. 333-5550 and 333-9328) of DaimlerChrysler North America 
Holding Corporation, the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-5074, 
333-7082 and 333-8998) of DaimlerChrysler AG, and the registration statements 
on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-64179 and 333-49647) of Chrysler Financial Company 
L.L.C. of our report dated March 15, 1999, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of DaimlerChrysler as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity 
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 
31, 1998, and related financial statement schedule. Such consolidated 
financial statements were prepared in accordance with United States generally 
accepted accounting principles except for the use of the proportionate method 
of consolidation with respect to certain joint ventures, as discussed above. 
Our report with respect thereto appears in the DaimlerChrysler Annual Report 
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 1998, and was based in part on 
the report of other auditors.

                                          KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG

Frankfurt am Main
March 31, 1999
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 3, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-3279

Lower Tribunal No. 90-14763-A

________________

Waymon Bishop,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge.

Waymon Bishop, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay E. Silver, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Waymon Bishop appeals the trial court’s November 18, 2013 order denying

his motion to clarify his sentences in lower tribunal case number 90-14763-A.1

This court has considered Bishop’s motion as filed pursuant to Florida Rule of

Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

The order on review states, in pertinent part, “[I]n 2001, pursuant to the

Jimmy Ryce act [sic] the defendant was found to be a sexual predator” in lower

tribunal case number 01-10787.

The State concedes that it dismissed its petition to have Bishop declared a

sexual predator under the Jimmy Ryce Act in lower tribunal case number 01-

10787.2

Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of striking the sexual

predator language from the trial court’s November 18, 2013 order.3

Remanded with directions.

1

In lower tribunal case number 90-14763-A, Bishop was sentenced to ten years in

prison after pleading guilty to kidnapping, false imprisonment, and seven counts of

sexual battery.

2 The State had sought to have Bishop committed under the Jimmy Ryce Act as a

sexually violent predator in lower tribunal case number 01-10787. According to

the State, however, after Bishop received a life sentence in an unrelated case

(lower tribunal case number 98-41196), the State dismissed its Jimmy Ryce

Petition. Bishop’s life sentence in lower tribunal case number 98-41196 was

subsequently reduced to twenty years.

3 We note that Bishop’s convictions may qualify him as a “sexual offender” under

section 943.0435, Florida Statutes; that issue, however, is not before us.

2
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

315PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2018

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Professor Marin K. Levy.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Professor Marin K. Levy for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
RUSSELL ROY SMITH

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5644

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

Petition A lleging I neffective A ssistance of A ppellate C ounsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Russell Roy Smith, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on

the merits.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ.

, CONCUR.
STATE v. Terraine Sanchez BYERS

69A06-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2019

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Byers, Terraine Sanchez.

*395The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 27th of February 2019 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of March 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 18th day of April 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Mission West Properties, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 4. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

| 5. | [Intentionally omitted] |
|----|-------------------------|

|   | By: /s/ Wayne N. Pham     |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Wayne N. Pham             |
|   | Vice President of Finance |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard DIETRICH.

No. 2003-KK-2377.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 26, 2003.

In re Dietrich, Richard;—Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. H, Nos. 16746, 16748, 16749; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2003 KW 1445.

Stay denied; writ denied.

KIMBALL, J., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MerisantWorldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony J.  Nocchiero    |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | November 14,  2005  |

 

----