alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1606-DR]


Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated September 24, 2005, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 3, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include Categories C 
through G under the Public Assistance program for the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2005:

    Chambers, Galveston, Hardin, Jasper, Jefferson, Liberty, Newton, 
Orange, and Tyler Counties for Public Assistance [Categories C--G] 
(already designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public 
Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-20425 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Carbon Graphite Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donghai
Yu, chief executive officer of the Company, and Ting Chen, chief financial
officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      May 15, 2009
            /s/ Donghai YuDonghai
      Yu
              Chief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      May 15, 2009
            /s/ Ting ChenTing
      Chen
              Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Charles C. McCormick, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

*519
      *C. B. Mathis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

The probative force and effect of the evidence in this case is such that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 Sou. Rep. 428, and it is so ordered.

Eeversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J.. concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
#### Packard Florida Motors Company, a Florida Corporation, Pla*intiff in Error,*v. F. P. Fildes and Virginia Fildes, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 10, 1928.

*Walter D. Payne,*for Plaintiff in Error *■*

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *899judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 59114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Applications of Maxjet Airways, Inc. for Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2005-9-26) [Docket OST-
2004-17171].

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding MAXjet 
Airways, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
October 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets OST-2004-17171 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room PL-401), 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the 
parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa R. Balgobin, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: September 30, 2005.
William. Bertram,
Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division.
[FR Doc. 05-20332 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
In the MATTER OF the Appeal of: VANCE SOLAR 1, LLC, Appellant

No. COA18-395

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To
      the
      Board of Directors


Power
      Technology, Inc.


Austin,
      Texas





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statement No.
      333-141799 of our report dated May 30, 2007 relating to the audit of the
      consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2007 and for each of
      the two years then ended appearing in this Annual Report on Form
      10-KSB.




Malone
      & Bailey, PC


www.malone-bailey.com


Houston,
      Texas





June
      7,
      2007
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Boss Minerals,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as  filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 8, 2005


/s/ Andrei Krioukov
-------------------------------------
Andrei Krioukov, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventine RenewableHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Ajay Sabherwal, Chief Financial Officer of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by AventineRenewable Energy Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ajay Sabherwal      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Ajay Sabherwal          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 12, 2008       |

 

1

----
Exhibit 23.1 
 
                     Consent of Independent Auditors 
 
 
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782) and in the related Prospectus of  
Liberty Property Trust and Liberty Property Limited Partnership, to the  
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.  
333-22211) and in the related Prospectus of Liberty Property Trust and  
Liberty Property Limited Partnership, to the incorporation by reference  
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-94036), and to the  
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.  
333-14139) and in the related Prospectus of Liberty Property Trust of  
our report dated February 17, 1997, with respect to the consolidated  
financial statements and schedule of Liberty Property Trust included in  
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996. 
 



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania                  /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP 
February 26, 1997                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4649 

To prohibit funding to the Voice of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding to the Voice of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING THE VOICE OF 

4 AMERICA. 

5 No funds available to the Department of State or any 

6 other department or agency may be used to provide con7 tributions directly or indirectly to the Voice of America. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>






                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                    AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, made
as of November 15, 2002, between INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with an address
at 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 (the "Company"), and ADAM B.
GILBERT, residing at 60 Cowdin Circle, Chappaqua, New York 10514 ("the
Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Executive is presently employed by the Company pursuant to
an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2000, by and
between the Executive and the Company (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to further amend the
Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, The Executive and
the Company agree as follows:

         1. DEFINED TERMS. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

         2. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1 OF THE AGREEMENT. Section 1 of the Agreement
is amended to replace "December 31, 2002" with "December 31, 2005", thereby
extending the term of the Agreement to, and defining the Expiration Date as,
December 31, 2005.

         3. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(a) OF THE AGREEMENT. Section 3(a) of the
Agreement is amended to replace "$400,000" with "$440,000" effective as of
January 1, 2002, thereby defining the Base Salary as $440,000 per annum.

         4. AFFIRMATION. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

         5. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

         6. GOVERNING LAW. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without reference to the
conflict of law provisions thereof.



                [The rest of this page left intentionally blank.]


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.


                                           INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


                                           By: /s/ STEPHEN B. SIEGEL
                                              ---------------------------
                                           Name: STEPHEN B. SIEGEL
                                                -------------------------
                                           Title: PRESIDENT
                                                 ------------------------


                                           /s/Adam B. Gilbert
                                           ------------------------------
                                           ADAM B. GILBERT

                                       2
#### W. E. Lee & Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Hardee & Gentile, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed February 1, 1928.

*Hampton, Bull*c& *Pencke,*and *Bussy <& Johnston,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Shutt-s*cfi *Bowen,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00093-CV

IN RE: BRIAN KASEY EMBODY

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brian Kasey Embody has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks this 

Court to order the District Clerk of Upshur County to file his application for writ of habeas 

corpus and place it before this Court. 

This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a “judge of a district or 

county court in the court of appeals district.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004). 

This Court has mandamus jurisdiction over the district clerk only when the district clerk’s 

actions interfere with this Court’s jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 

2004). We do not have jurisdiction over the district clerk in the context of this petition because

the intermediate courts of appeals have no original jurisdiction over petitions for habeas corpus 

relief in connection with criminal proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 

(West 2005); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d). In the absence of jurisdiction, we must deny 

the petition.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: November 25, 2014

Date Decided: November 26, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19990]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agenda for Board of Directors' Meeting

October 14, 2005
8 a.m.-1:30 p.m.

    The meeting will be held at the Inter-American Foundation, 901 N. 
Stuart Street, 10th Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203.
    The meeting will be open except for the portion specified as a 
closed session as provided in 22 CFR 1004.4(f).

8 a.m. Call to Order, Approval of the Minutes of the November 30, 2004 
meeting.
8:15 a.m. Strategic Planning (Portions of this discussion will be 
closed to discuss personnel issues, as provided in 22 CFR 1004.4(f)).
12 p.m. Lunch.
12:30 p.m. President's Report and other business.
1:30 p.m. Adjournment.

Jocelyn Nieva,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-19990 Filed 9-30-05; 2:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-M
N OTE : This order is nonprecede n tial. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

JOHN D. WILSON, JR. , Claimant

- Appellant

,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SE CRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

______________________ ____
201 3

- 7037

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 11

- 0165, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________

O R D E R

John D. Wilson, Jr. moves for leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis.

The court notes that Wilson did not file the required supplemental in forma pauperis form for prisoners. Federal Circuit Form 6A. Case: 13-7037 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 02/12/2013JOHN WILSON , JR

. V

. SHINSEKI 2
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) Wilson’s motion for leave to proceed in form a pa uperis is denied.

(2) If Wilson does not submit the supplemental in forma pauperis form for prisoners within 14 days of the date of this order, the court will dismiss this appeal.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Hor baly Clerk

s 2 4 Case: 13-7037 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 02/12/2013
#### STATE ex rel. Vincent RUSSELL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2266.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Russell, Vincent; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, Nos. 93-4970 & 97-7531; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-620.

Denied. *State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C.,*94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175; *State ex rel. Degreat v. State,*98-0690 (La.7/2/98), 724 So.2d 205.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40101

Conference Calendar

 

ANTHONY L. SUMMERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UP GIBSON, Officer; D. DOUGHTY, Warden; UP MATTHEWS, Sergeant,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CV-1406

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony L. Summers, Texas prisoner # 1130913, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action for failure to state a claim for failing to exhaust

administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Summers

argues that he filed his complaint in the district court without

having exhausted the grievance procedures because of fear of what

would happen to him, but he does not allege that he has been

retaliated against for filing grievances or lawsuits. Summers

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-40101

-2-

stated in his complaint that he did not exhaust the grievance

procedures at his institution. In his reply to the magistrate

judge’s report, he gave no explanation for his failure to exhaust

and made no argument against the magistrate judge’s

recommendation of dismissal on that basis. The district court

did not err in dismissing Summers’s action for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. See Days v. Johnson, 322 F.3d 863, 866

(5th Cir. 2003).

Summers’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

Summers is hereby informed that the dismissal of this appeal

as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g), in addition to the strike for the district court’s

dismissal. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir.

1996) (“[D]ismissals as frivolous in the district courts or the

court of appeals count [as strikes] for the purposes of

[§ 1915(g)].”). We caution Summers that once he accumulates

three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
In the MATTER OF: I.M.P., A.M.S.

No. COA 18-256

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United
States Code





I, Daniel
P. Hansen, the Chief Financial Officer of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC
(“Summit”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of
Summit for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Summit.





/s/
      Daniel P. HansenDaniel
      P. HansenChief
      Financial OfficerSummit
      Hotel Properties, LLCNovember
      16, 2009