alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1













Certification Pursuant To


Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








I,
      Gary E. Robinette, certify that:






1.    I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.;






2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;






4.    The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:






a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;






b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and






c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;








5.    The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):






a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to  adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and






b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
August 11, 2008








/s/
      Gary E.
  RobinetteName:
            
            Gary
      E. RobinetteTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Scott              Miller                                      |   |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   | Scott              Miller                                               |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer November                14, 2008 |   |   |   |

|   | /s/                  Faith Forbis                                              |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   | Faith                Forbis                                                    |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                    Financial OfficerNovember                    14, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 58289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20156]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 58289]]


                Executive Order 13386 of September 30, 2005

                
Further Amendment to Executive Order 13369, 
                Relating to the President's Advisory Panel on Federal 
                Tax Reform

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and to further extend the reporting deadline 
                of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
                Reform, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Section 5 of Executive Order 13369 of 
                January 7, 2005, as amended by Executive Order 13379 of 
                June 16, 2005, is further amended by deleting 
                ``September 30, 2005'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
                ``November 1, 2005''.

                Sec. 2. Section 7 of Executive Order 13369 of January 
                7, 2005, is further amended by deleting ``30 days after 
                submitting its report pursuant to section 5 of this 
                order'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``November 15, 
                2005''.

                Sec. 3. This order is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity, against the United 
                States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, 
                employees or agents, or any other person.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 30, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-20156
Filed 10-4-05; 9:57 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
ERNST & YOUNG LLP                  One Kansas City Place     Phone: 816 474 5200
                                   1200 Main Street
                                   Kansas City
                                   Missouri 64105-2143



                Report of Independent Accountants on Management's
                    Assertion on Compliance with the Minimum
               Servicing Standards Set Forth in the Uniform Single
                    Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

The Audit Committee
PNC Bank Corp.

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of Management on Compliance with the Minimum  Servicing  Standards
Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers,  that
except for noncompliance  with the minimum servicing standard for custodial bank
accounts,  Midland Loan Services,  Inc. (MLS), a wholly-owned  subsidiary of PNC
Bank Corp.,  complied  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP)  except  for  commercial  loan  and  multifamily  loan
servicing, minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.1., which the Mortgage Bankers
Association of American has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing during
the year ended December 31, 1998.  Management is responsible for MLS' compliance
with  those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an  opinion  on
management's assertions about MLS' compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,   on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  MLS'  compliance  with  those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on MLS'
compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that except for noncompliance  with the
minimum servicing standard for custodial account  reconciliations,  MLS complied
with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 1998, is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

As discussed in management's  assertion,  the following  material  noncompliance
occurred at MLS during the year ended December 31, 1998. With regard to standard
I.4,  reconciling  items exist which have not been  resolved  within 90 calendar
days of their original identification.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

January 22, 1999



       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
HAMLET H.M.A., LLC d/b/a Sandhills Regional Medical Center v. Pedro HERNANDEZ, M.D.

No. 425A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, for Hernandez, Pedro (M.D.)

William S. F. Freeman, Attorney at Law, Rebecca C. Huntington, Attorney at Law, for Hamlet H.M.A., LLC D/B/A Sandhills Regional Medical Center

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of 

Regency Centers Corporation, 

the general partner of 

Regency Centers, L.P.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement (No. 333-149856) on Form S-3ASR and (No. 333-127274) on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P. of our reports dated March 17, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers, L.P.as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2008, and related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers,L.P. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

March 17, 2009 

Jacksonville, Florida 

Certified Public Accountants
Nathaniel R. WEBB v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, et al.

No. 105P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 17, 2018

Mr. Nathaniel R. Webb, For Webb, Nathaniel R.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For N.C. State Highway Patrol, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 5th of April 2018 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, N.C. Industrial Commission County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of April 2018."
Jacqueline Louise NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. Jean-François GARIÈPY, Defendant.

No. COA17-1175

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 November 12, 2008
    /s/ Michael M. NuzzoMichael M. NuzzoChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50179

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO GARAY-BURGOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1385-ALL-DB

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Arturo Garay-Burgos appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garay

complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that

the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Garay thus

contends that his sentence should not exceed the maximum terms of

imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 
No. 03-50179

-2-

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Garay acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006

                                             /S/       ROBERT E. MANNE
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                       Robert E. Manne
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
### STATE OF MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Plaintiff

- Ap pellee, SC: 15486 2 , 15488 6 v COA: 3359 47
BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS and DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS,

Defendants

- Appellees, and JILL STEIN, Intervening Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________ DONALD J. TRUMP ,

Plaintiff

- Ap pellee, SC: 15486 8 , 154887 v COA: 3359 58
BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS and DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS,

Defendants

- Appellees, and JILL STEIN, Intervening Defendant

- Appellant. _________________________________________/ Statement of Justice Larsen Grant ing Intervening Defendant
- Appellant’s Motion to Disqualify December 8, 2016L ARSEN , J. I grant the motions to disqualify myself from participation in Attorney

General v Bd of State Canvassers (Docket Nos. 154862 and 154886) and Trump v Bd of State
Canvassers (Docket Nos. 154868 and 154887). I do not do so lightly. Justices of this Court ar e obligated “to remain on any case absent good grounds for recusal.” Adair v Michigan , 474 Mich 1027, 1040

- 1041 (2006) (statement by T AYLOR , C.J., and M ARKMAN , J.). The citizens of Michigan elect the Justices to resolve the complex disputes that reach th e Supreme Court, and we must not shrink from that duty. In the lower courts, a recused judge is replaced by a substitute. In our Court, a recusal leaves the Court shorthanded and, therefore, “deprives the public and litigants of the full collegial body t hat they have selected as the state’s court of last resort.” Id . at 1040. Nonetheless, I conclude that the unique circumstances of this case demand my recusal.
Before the November 8, 2016 election, now President

- elect Donald J. Trump, or his campaign, inc luded me on a list of 21 possible nominees to fill the vacancy on the United States Supreme Court created by the untimely passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. I did not seek inclusion on the list, had no notice of my inclusion before its publication, and ha ve had no contact with the president

- elect, or his campaign, regarding the vacancy. Yet the president

- elect and his surrogates have repeatedly affirmed his intention to select someone from the list to fill the vacancy.
My appearance on the president

- ele ct’s list and his presence as a party in these cases creates a conflict requiring my disqualification. Accordingly, I grant the motions for disqualification.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MortgageIT Holdings, Inc.(the "Company") for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Glenn J. Mouridy, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ GLENNJ.MOURIDY                                    

|  | Glenn J. MouridyPresident andChief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2005 |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Amy (Drohan) HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. Brendan DROHAN, Defendant.

No. COA18-399

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.