alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted and Order filed February 10, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00708-CV

____________

THE PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, 

Appellant

V.

ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-72970

ORDER

The parties’ joint motion to modify the briefing schedule is granted.

Accordingly, we order the following:

a. Port’s supplemental brief of appellant (15,000 words) to be filed April 13, 

2015;

b. Zachry’s supplemental brief of appellee (15,000 words) to be filed June 

12, 2015; and 
c. Port’s supplemental reply brief (7,500 words) to be filed July 13, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and McCally.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1998-2
$ 153,615,935.94 5.97% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Feb-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Mar-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Apr-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 May-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jun-98           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jul-98   3,135,779     756,558           0    0.00%    4,735,930    3.15%
 Aug-98   3,120,797     741,115       9,747    0.08%    7,928,180    5.38%
 Sep-98   2,998,492     725,745      57,331    0.48%   11,312,711    7.84%
 Oct-98   3,683,731     710,977     315,399    2.69%   12,114,806    8.61%
 Nov-98   4,698,139     692,835     631,214    5.57%   12,433,762    9.14%
 Dec-98   4,971,139     669,697   1,079,532    9.86%   12,961,723    9.86%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  22,608,077   4,296,927   2,093,223

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 10349 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15

- cr
- 20693

- UU

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DAVIER DIAZ,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( April 10, 2017 )
Before MARCUS , WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10349 Date Filed: 04/10/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Davier Diaz appeals his sentence of imprisonment for 80 months following
his guilty plea t o being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Diaz contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentencing range when
it relied on the residual clause of section 4B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines to
conclude that his prior convictions in Florida of burglary of an unoccupied dwelling qualif ied as crimes of violence. He argu es that the residual clause of
section 4B1.2( a)(2) is unconstitutionally vague

. We affirm.
The district court committed no error. Diaz’s argument is foreclosed by the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Beckles v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 886 , 890 (2017) , and our earlier decision in United States v. Matchett , 802 F.3d 1185,
1194

‒ 95 (11th Cir. 2015)

. In Beckles , the Supreme Court affirmed this Court and
rule d , as we had in Matchett , that the residual clause of section 4B1.2(a)(2) was not unconstitutionally vague because the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to challenges for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment

. Beckles , 137 S. Ct. at 890, 895. I n Matchett , we also determined that a prior
conviction for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling under Florida law, Fla. Stat. § 810.02(1)(b), (3)(b) , was a “crime of violence” under the residual clause of
section 4B1.2(a)(2)

. 802 F.3d at 1196

‒ 97. We affirm Diaz’s sentence.
AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10349 Date Filed: 04/10/2017 Page: 2 of 2
#### John T. RANKIN, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 2003-SC-0482-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Aug. 21, 2003.

Michael R. McMahon, Louisville, Counsel for Movant.

Bruce K. Davis, Executive Director, Jay R. Garrett, Bar Counsel, Kentucky Bar Association, Frankfort, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

John T. Rankin of Louisville, by counsel and pursuant to SCR 3.480(3), has moved this Court for an order permanently disbarring him from the practice of law in Kentucky and permitting him to resign under terms of permanent disbarment.

In December of 2003, Rankin, whose membership no. is 56565, entered a plea of guilty to one count of illegal possession of a controlled substance in the first-degree, Schedule II, morphine, in violation of KRS 218A.1415, a Class D felony and one count of illegal possession of a controlled substance, Schedule I Hallucinogen, marijuana, in violation of KRS 218A.1422, a Class A misdemeanor.

Rankin admits that his conduct violated SCR 3.130-8.3(b) which provides: “It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.” He acknowledges that his conduct was unethical and in violation of the rules of professional conduct. Rankin seeks to terminate the proceedings against him by resigning under terms of perma*873nent disbarment. He states that he fully understands that he cannot be reinstated to the practice of law from permanent disbarment and that the provisions of SCR S.480(S)(a) and SCR 8.510 do not apply. Rankin states that he will never again engage in the practice of law in Kentucky.

Based on the above facts and the motion by Rankin, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion by John T. Rankin to resign under terms of permanent disbarment is granted.

Rankin is directed to pay the costs of this action in accordance with SCR 3.450 in the amount of $44.68, within 30 days, for which execution may issue.

Pursuant to SCR 3.390, if he has not already done so, Rankin shall within ten days of the entry of this order notify all his clients of his inability to represent them and furnish copies of such letters of notice to the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association. He shall also provide notification of his disbarment to all courts in which he has matters pending.

Pursuant to SCR 3.165(6), Rankin shall to the extent possible, immediately cancel and cease any and all advertising activities in which he may be engaged.

All concur.

ENTERED: August 21, 2003.

/s/ Joseph E, Lambert Chief Justice
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

267P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2018

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Erik R. Zimmerman, Attorney at Law, Morgan P. Abbott, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Cooper, Roy A.

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, for North Carolina Bipartisan Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Caroline P. Mackie, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, John Michael Durnovich, Attorney at Law, Wendy R. Weiser, Attorney at Law, Daniel I. Weiner, Attorney at Law, Douglas E. Keith, Attorney at Law, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Democracy North Carolina.

Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Charles E. Coble, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Hon. James G. Martin, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for NC Professors of Constitutional Law.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of August 2018 by North Carolina Professors of Constitutional Law Enrique Armijo, Joseph Blocher, John Charles Boger, Guy-Uriel Charles, Michael Kent Curtis, April G. Dawson, Steve Friedland, Michal J. Gerhardt, Sarah Ludington, William P. Marshall, Gene R. Nichol, Wilson Parker, Jedediah Purdy & Theordore *588M. Shaw for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
##### 



Exhibit 99.11(INFOSYS LOGO) INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Registered Office
Electronics city, Hosur Road, Bangalore  560 100, India. PROXY FORM Regd. Folio No./DP Client ID I/We  of  in the district of
 being a member / members of the Company
hereby appoint  of  in the district of
 or failing him/her  of 
in the district 
as my /our proxy to vote for me / us on my /our behalf at the TWENTY THIRD
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the Company to be held at 3.00 p.m. on Saturday, June
12, 2004 at the J. N.Tata Auditorium, National Science Seminar Complex, Indian
Institute of Science, Bangalore-560 012 India and at any adjournment(s)
thereof. Signed this
    
    
    
    day of
    
    
    2004.
 Rupee one Revenue Stamp Signature Notes: This form, in order to be effective, should be duly stamped, completed
and signed and must be deposited at the Registered Office of the Company, not
less than 48 hours before the meeting.    (INFOSYS LOGO) INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Registered Office
ELECTRONICS CITY, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE  560 100, INDIA. ATTENDANCE SLIP Twenty Third Annual General Meeting  June 12, 2004  Regd. Folio No.
    
    No. of shares held
 I certify that I am a member / proxy for the member of the Company. I hereby record my presence at the TWENTY THIRD ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the
Company at J. N. Tata Auditorium, National Science Seminar Complex, Indian
Institute of Science, Bangalore-560 012, India, at 3.00 p.m. on Saturday, June
12, 2004. Members / proxys name in
BLOCK letters
    
    Signature of member / proxy
 Note: Please fill up this attendance slip and hand it over at the entrance of the meeting hall.
Members are requested to bring their copies of the Annual Report to the meeting.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Scott ELLIS

No. 281P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Kirby H. Smith, III, Attorney at Law, New Bern, for Ellis, Christopher Scott.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of August 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 18th of August 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of September 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Connie Prentice REAVES, Defendant.

No. COA18-100

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

NO ERROR.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4861 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Steve Goodman 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Mr. QUIGLEY (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. LIPINSKI, 

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. BEAN, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KIRK, Mrs. HALVORSON, Mr. COSTELLO, Mrs. 

BIGGERT, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

HARE, Mr. SCHOCK, and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STEVE GOODMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in 

6 Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4861 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.13
















CONSENT OF ANNE-MARIE BEAUCHAMP







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Anne-Marie Beauchamp, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2012 Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec” completed in March 2013; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2012 Exploration Program – Wabamisk Project” completed in January 2013;




concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau and Wabamisk properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for both properties, under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.2.4 Geological Setting; 3.2.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.2.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,













			
	/S/ Anne-Marie Beauchamp

	 
	 

	Name:

Anne-Marie Beauchamp

Geologist in training

	 
	 









May 13, 2013
#### In re Dedrick Arvell MOORE.

No. 2003-OB-1937.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 11, 2003.

In re Moore, Dedrick Arvell; — Plaintiff; Applying for Permission to Take Bar Examination.

Granted. Petitioner is allowed to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination in July 2003. Within fifteen days of the com*71pletion of the examination, Petitioner shall file a brief and supporting documentation with the Committee on Bar Admissions, responding to its objections to his application for admission.
STATE v. Dexter Leon SURRATT

203P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Drew Nelson, Attorney at Law, for Surratt, Dexter Leon.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of August 2018 by State of NC to Deem Response to Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials will be held November 29-30, 2005, in the Kenneth Eaton Conference Room 819 at the Lafayette Building, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. On November 30, 2005, the meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and conclude at approximately 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the administration of national cemeteries, soldiers' lots and plots, the selection of new national cemetery sites, the erection of appropriate memorials, and the adequacy of Federal burial benefits. The Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding these activities.

On November 29, 2005, the Committee will receive updates on National Cemetery Administration (NCA) issues. In the afternoon, the Committee will tour the National Archives in Washington, DC. On November 30, 2005, the Committee will tour the White House and then reconvene for a business session, beginning at 1:30 p.m., which will include discussions of committee recommendations, future meeting sites, and potential agenda topics.

                    Time will not be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the public. Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. David Schettler, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 273-5175. The Committee will accept written comments. Comments may be transmitted electronically to the Committee at                     *dave.schettler@va.gov*                     or mailed to the National Cemetery Administration (41C2), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. In the public's communications with the Committee, the writers must identify themselves and state the organizations, associations, or persons they represent.                

Dated: October 4, 2005.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20447 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Darryl A. WILLIAMS.

No. 2003-KH-2046.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Williams, Darryl A.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 434-078.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the pleading to the district court for its consideration. The district court is directed to provide this Court with a copy of its ruling.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41045

PIERANGELO PANOZZO, Plaintiff-Appellant

versus WEILI ZHENG PANOZZO, Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(B-96-CA-208) August 5, 1998 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dominic Rashaun STROUD

No. 172P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, For Stroud, Dominic Rashaun

M. Denise Stanford, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 5th of June 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of June 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Ervin, J. recused