alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the specially adapted 
housing assistance program for individuals with terminal illnesses, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2014

 Ms. Brownley of California (for herself and Mr. Jones) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the specially adapted 
housing assistance program for individuals with terminal illnesses, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guarantee Housing for Terminally Ill 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH 
              TERMINAL ILLNESSES.

    (a) Individuals With Terminal Illnesses.--Chapter 21 of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:
``Sec. 2110. Specially adapted housing assistance for individuals with 
              terminal illnesses
    ``(a) Priority.--In providing assistance under this chapter (not 
including section 2108), the Secretary shall give priority to an 
individual who is--
            ``(1) eligible for such assistance; and
            ``(2) diagnosed with a terminal illness.
    ``(b) Reimbursement.--(1) If a veteran diagnosed with a terminal 
illness is eligible for assistance under subsection (a) or (b) of 
section 2101 of this title or section 2102A and applies for, and has 
not yet received, such assistance, the Secretary shall reimburse the 
veteran for costs relating to specially adapted housing if--
            ``(A) such costs are for acquisitions or adaptions that the 
        veteran is eligible for under such assistance;
            ``(B) the veteran paid such costs after applying for such 
        assistance; and
            ``(C) such reimbursement does not exceed the amount of such 
        assistance for which the veteran is eligible, in accordance 
        with section 2102.
    ``(2) A reimbursement by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be 
treated as a grant for assistance under this chapter.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 
2109 the following:

``2110. Specially adapted housing assistance for individuals with 
                            terminal illnesses.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### George Burns, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed January 26, 1928.

*Price, Price, Neeley <& Kehoe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred 11. Davis,*Attorney General, and *II. E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

The information upon which the plaintiff in error in this case was convicted, ran in the name of, and was signed, filed and sworn to by an assistant county solicitor, and the judgment of the court below must therefore be reversed upon the authority of Segars v. State, decided at the June term, 1927, and Sawyer v. State, 113 So. 736.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Strum, J., absent because of illness.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4202 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4202

 To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal benefits 
    programs based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for the 
                                elderly.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2014

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on 
Oversight and Government Reform and Armed Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal benefits 
    programs based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for the 
                                elderly.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CPI-E Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES FOR CERTAIN FEDERAL BENEFITS PROGRAMS 
              BASED ON INCREASES IN THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR THE 
              ELDERLY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whenever there is an 
increase in the Consumer Price Index for the elderly, published by the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics, the dollar amounts in effect for the 
payment of the following benefits, as such amounts were in effect 
immediately before the increase in the Consumer Price Index for the 
elderly, shall be increased by the same percentage as such price index 
was increased:
            (1) An annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System or 
        the Federal Employees Retirement System.
            (2) Department of Veterans Affairs wartime disability 
        compensation under section 1114 of title 38, United States 
        Code.
            (3) Department of Veterans Affairs additional compensation 
        for dependents under section 1115(1) of such title.
            (4) The Department of Veterans Affairs clothing allowance 
        under section 1162 of such title.
            (5) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency and indemnity 
        compensation to surviving spouse under subsections (a) through 
        (d) of section 1311 of such title.
            (6) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency and indemnity 
        compensation to children under sections 1313(a) and 1314 of 
        such title.
            (7) Military retirement and survivor benefit programs, as 
        defined in section 1461(b) of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
SC REEN AC TOR S GUILD-AM ERIC AN FEDER ATION OF TELEVISION AND R ADIO AR TISTS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. FEDER AL INSUR

ANC E C O M PANY, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-56402 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-07123-DM GVB K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dolly M . Ge e , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d Oc tobe r 22, 2015 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : R AW LINSON a

nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s and PONSOR , ** Se nior Distric t Judge
. Sc re e n Ac tors Guild - Ame ric an Fe de ration of Ra dio a nd Te le vision Artists (SAG) a ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s de c ision de ny ing its mo tion for sum m ary 

# F IL ED JAN 15 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble M ic ha e l A. Ponsor, Se nior Distric t Judgefor the U.S. Distric t C ourt for M a ssa c huse tts, sitting by de s igna tion.judgm e nt a

nd gra nting de fe nda

nt-Appe lle e Fe de ra l Insura nc e C om pa ny ’ s (Fe de ra l)
m otion for sum

m a ry judgm e nt. B e c a

use SAG ha s not ide ntifie d a c ove re d Loss for whic h Fe de ra l bre a c he d its duty to inde m nify , SAG’ s c la im s for bre a c h of c ontra c t and for bre a c h of the c ove na nt of good fa ith a

nd fa i r de a ling fa i l. Se eDav is v
. Farme rs Ins. Grp. , 134 C a l. App. 4th 100, 105 (2005) (e xpla ining tha

t “ [t] he first ste p in a ny insura nc e c ove ra ge disputeis to de te rm i ne whe the r the insuring provisions of the

polic y a fforde d c ove ra ge for the a lle ge d losse s” ). SAG is not e ntitle d

to c o ve ra ge ba se d sole ly

on a c la im for attorne y ’ s fe e s unte the re d to a

ny insura b le Loss. Se eHe a lth N

e t, Inc . v . RLI Ins. C

o. , 206 C a l. App. 4th 232, 257 (2012) (holding tha t “ the c la im

for attorne y ’ s fe e s is c ove re d only to thee xte nt it a

rise s out of thec ove re d wrongful a c ts.” ) Unde r C a lifornia la w, a pre -e xisting obliga

tion is not a

c ove re d loss. Se eAugust Entm’t, Inc . v . Philade lphia Indem . Ins. C o . , 146 C a l. App. 4th 565, 578 (2007). As SAG a dm itte d ly

ha d a pre -e xisting obliga

tion to pa y the fore ign le vy

funds to thesta

te c ourt pla intiffs, SAG’ s fa ilure t o honor tha t obliga tion is not a

c ove re d Loss a s a m atte r of la

w. Se eid . Ac c ordingly , SAG is not e ntitle d to c ove ra ge for the $330,000.00 in a

ttorne y ’ s fe e s a sse sse d a g a i nst SAG in the sta te c ourt c a se , be c a use the aw ard wa s ba s e d

on the sta

te c ourt pla intiffs’ suc c e ss in se c uring pa ym e nt of thepre -e x isting obliga t ion. Se eHe alth N

e t , 206 C a l . App. 4th a

t 257 2(e m

pha siz ing tha

t “ [c ] ove ra ge c annot be bootstra ppe d ba se d sole l y

on a c la im for attorne y ’ s fe e s” ). AFFIRM E D.

3
**Exhibit 23.0**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Wehave issued our report dated March 28, 2007 (which includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the application of Statement of Financial AccountingStandard No. 123(R) and 158 as of December 31, 2006), accompanyingthe consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the AnnualReport of TF Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid report in the Registration Statements of TF Financial Corporation onForms S-8 (File No. 333-87176, effective December 7, 1994,File No. 333-09235, effective July 31, 1996, File No. 333-27085,effective May 14, 1997, and File No. 333-125116, effectiveMay 20, 2005).
| /s/ GRANT  THORNTON LLP    |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| March 28, 2007        |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jadon FORT, Appellant.

No. ED 82240.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

John M. Morris III, Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J, and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jadon Fort appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of second degree domestic assault in violation of Section 565.078 RSMo (2000). He challenges the trial court’s ruling admitting evidence of his alleged prior bad acts committed against his victim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion. *State v. Churchill,*98 S.W.3d 536, 538 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*687We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Jeffrey R. Steinhilber, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ERICO International Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: November 1, 2006 By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Steinhilber       Name: Jeffrey R. Steinhilber  Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 16, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00375

- CR

Charles D. TUTTOILMONDO Jr.

,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2246

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due on February 28, 2018

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of February, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

          - [Funding Opportunity Number: CE05-024] 

                    A notice announcing the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2005 funds for a cooperative agreement that seeks to evaluate interventions to decrease alcohol-impaired driving in community settings and the resulting deaths and injuries was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 19, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 223, pages 67738-67744.                 

The notice is amended as follows: On page 67740, Column 2, Section IV.1. Address to Request application Package, delete the first sentence and replace with “To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398 (OMB number 0925-0001 rev. 

9/2004). 

Dated: January 28, 2005. 

William P. Nichols, 

Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 05-2043 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions);          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: August 14, 2009   */s/ Kerry W. Boekelheide* Kerry W. BoekelheideChief Executive Officer
#### Robert S. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Alice G. HECTOR, Respondent.

No. 3D03-1561.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 2003.

Karen J. Haas, Robert J. Merlin, Miami, for petitioner.

Bette Ellen Quiat, Miami, for respondent.

Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Robert S. Young, seeks cer-tiorari review on a plethora of issues in this tortuously over-litigated case. By and large, we deny certiorari on all issues, save one. Because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in freezing assets in a purported trust account without either a basis in the pleadings or the evidence, the order freezing the trust account proceeds is quashed. *See Young v. Young,*816 So.2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); *City of Miami Beach v. Swedroe,*788 So.2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); *Resil v. Resil,*755 So.2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

We further note that the trial court would not allow the petitioner, who was neither disrespectful nor disruptive, to speak to his attorney. The court stated: “No, you may not speak to your attorney in this hearing. You may give your attorney a note. Is that clear?” This, we believe is somewhat improper.

Certiorari granted, in part; order quashed.
Brian Carter BEASLEY, Plaintiff, v. Katherine Leigh BEASLEY, Defendant.

No. COA18-47

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 462 

To require the conveyance of certain public land within the boundaries of 

Camp Williams, Utah, to support the training and readiness of the 

Utah National Guard. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. 

STEWART) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the conveyance of certain public land within the 

boundaries of Camp Williams, Utah, to support the 

training and readiness of the Utah National Guard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Utah National Guard 

5 Readiness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH. 

7 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 

8 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec9 retary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 462 IH

1 Management, shall convey, without consideration, to the 

2 State of Utah all right, title, and interest of the United 

3 States in and to certain lands comprising approximately 

4 420 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Pro5 posed Camp Williams Land Transfer’’ and dated June 14, 

6 2011, which are located within the boundaries of the pub7 lic lands currently withdrawn for military use by the Utah 

8 National Guard and known as Camp Williams, Utah, for 

9 the purpose of permitting the Utah National Guard to use 

10 the conveyed land as provided in subsection (c). 

11 (b) SUPERSEDENCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.—Execu12 tive Order No. 1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by 

13 section 907 of the Camp W.G. Williams Land Exchange 

14 Act of 1989 (title IX of Public Law 101–628; 104 Stat. 

15 4501), is hereby superseded, only insofar as it affects the 

16 lands identified for conveyance to the State of Utah under 

17 subsection (a). 

18 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The lands conveyed 

19 to the State of Utah under subsection (a) shall revert to 

20 the United States if the Secretary of Defense determines 

21 that the land, or any portion thereof, is sold or attempted 

22 to be sold, or that the land, or any portion thereof, is used 

23 for non-National Guard or non-national defense purposes. 

24 (d) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.—With respect to any 

25 portion of the land conveyed under subsection (a) that the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 462 IH

1 Secretary of Defense determines is subject to reversion 

2 under subsection (c), if the Secretary of Defense also de3 termines that the portion of the conveyed land contains 

4 hazardous materials, the State of Utah shall pay the 

5 United States an amount equal to the fair market value 

6 of that portion of the land, and the reversionary interest 

7 shall not apply to that portion of the land. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Entech Environmental Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Burr D.  Northrop,,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 13, 2006

/s/ Burr D. Northrop
-----------------------------------------
Burr D. Northrop, Chief Executive Officer
July 9, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MOHAMAD G. ALATKI , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00281

- CV V.

TIDEWATER FIN ANCE COMPANY D/B/A T IDEWATER MOTOR CREDI T

AND D/B/A TIDEWATER CREDIT SERVICES , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment sign ed by the court below on February 19, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Mohamad G. Alatki.

We further ord er this decision certified below for observance.