alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BYRD v. GLANVILLE.

A18A0316

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

February 22, 2018 Reconsideration Dismissed March 27, 2018

Herschel Gerald Byrd, for Appellant.

Ural D.L. Glanville, Christopher Michael Carr, Annette M. Cowart, Dennis R. Dunn, Russell D. Willard, Elizabeth Ahern Monyak, Atlanta, for Appellee.

McFadden, Presiding Judge.

This case involves a mandamus petition filed in this court by a prison inmate, Herschel Gerald Byrd. The respondent, Judge Ural Glanville, has moved to dismiss the petition. We grant the motion because Byrd failed to use the mandatory form promulgated by the Administrative Office of the Courts ("AOC") and we, therefore, dismiss the petition.

On October 26, 2017, Byrd filed a petition for mandamus in this court, seeking to invoke this court's original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus ordering Judge Glanville to rule on the various motions filed by Byrd in connection with a criminal case in which he was the defendant. See OCGA § 9-6-22 (permitting person to petition appellate court to compel public officer to perform duty by mandamus). See also Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV ("[a]ppellate courts shall have the power to issue process in the nature of mandamus"); OCGA § 15-3-3.1 (a) (4) & (6) ("the Court of Appeals shall have jurisdiction in all cases involving extraordinary remedies and all other cases not reserved to the Supreme Court"). Byrd was incarcerated at the time he filed his petition.

Judge Glanville has moved to dismiss Byrd's mandamus petition arguing, among other things, that Byrd failed to file the AOC form required for such a petition. OCGA § 9-10-14 (b) requires inmates incarcerated in Georgia state or local facilities to use a special form promulgated by the AOC as their complaint or initial pleading in lawsuits against state or local agencies or officials.

> In relevant part, that statute provides the following: No clerk of any court shall accept for filing any action by an inmate of a state or local penal or correctional institution against any officer of state or local government unless the complaint or other initial pleading is on a form or forms promulgated by the AOC. This language is unambiguous and does not provide for any exceptions.

*427*Donald v. Price* , 283 Ga. 311, 658 S.E.2d 569 (2008) (punctuation omitted). Furthermore, the Georgia Supreme Court has held that "[a] clerk of court acts contrary to the requirements of OCGA § 9-10-14 (b) when the clerk accepts for filing a complaint or initial pleading against a Georgia agency or official that is not in accord with the statute's requirements." *Gay v. Owens* , 292 Ga. 480, 481 (1), 738 S.E.2d 614 (2013) (citation omitted).

The original mandamus petition that Byrd filed with this court is an initial pleading, subject to the requirements of *777OCGA § 9-1-14 (b). But Byrd failed to use the proper form when he filed the mandamus petition with this court. Accordingly, pursuant to OCGA § 9-10-14 (b), the petition must be dismissed.

*Case dismissed.*

Ray and Rickman, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 0002 5

- CR

Edward Flores

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (13 16196 D )

March 13, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal i s dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03- 07 -00 165 -CV Siem ens Corporation, Siem ens Aktiengesellschaft, and Ef fi cient Ne tworks, In c. , Appellan ts // Brice Barte k, Jam es P ickering, and Ru ssell Young, Cross-Appellan ts v. Br ic e Bar te k, J am e s P ic ke r ing , a nd R uss e ll Y oung , A ppe lle e s // Sie m e ns C or por at ion , Siem ens Aktiengesellschaft, and Ef fi cient Ne tworks, In c., Cr oss-Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-04- 0018 14 , HO NORAB LE SCO TT H. JENK INS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Th e pa rt ie s hav e fi le d a joint motio n inf or min gthi s Co ur

t th at th e y have se ttl e d th e ir dispute. They

ask this Court to set aside the trial court’s judgme nt and re mand the ca use for entry of or de rs purs ua

nt t o the ir se ttl e me nt. We gra

nt t he mot ion and se t a sid e the tr ia l c ourt ’s jud g me nt. See Tex. R. Ap p . P . 4 2 . 1 (a) (2)( B) . We further grant the motion to expedite the issuance of our mandate. See Tex. R. App. P . 18.1(c) . The c ause is remanded to the t rial court for e ntry of orde rs eff ectuating the pa

rties’ settlement. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (2)( B) .

______________

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Vac ated a nd rema nded Filed: June 1, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                  EX-99.1
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                    Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of TeleBanc Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TeleBanc
Financial Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income (as
revised see Note 24), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
                     
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of TeleBanc Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31,
1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                                /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Vienna, VA
February 20, 1998 (except with respect to the matter 
discussed in Note 24, as to which 
the date is May 11, 1998)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4641 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4641

    To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2014

   Mr. Higgins (for himself, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Maffei, Ms. 
Slaughter, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Rangel, Mr. King 
of New York, Ms. Meng, Mr. Owens, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, 
Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Reed, Mr. Engel, Mr. Crowley, 
  Mr. Serrano, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Bishop of New 
   York, and Mr. Jeffries) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ERIE CANALWAY NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR.

    Section 804(j) of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor Act 
(16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106-554) is amended by striking ``15'' 
and inserting ``30''.
                                 <all>
```
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30053 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. CL AI BO RN E W I LLI AM S , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 08- C R

- 340- 1
B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der ap poi n t ed t o represent C l ai born e W i l l i am s has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 738 ( 19 67 )
. W i l l i am s ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
STATE v. Jonathan E. BRUNSON

247P16-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Jonathan Eugene Brunson, for Brunson, Jonathan Eugene.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of October 2018 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
#### In re Kelly N. CALDWELL.

No. 2002-OB-2459.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 27, 2003.

ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Kelly N. Caldwell, is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of one year. During this period, petitioner shall provide evidence to the Committee on Bar Admissions, on at least a quarterly basis, demonstrating that he has made a good faith effort to satisfy his financial obligations. Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy his financial obligations, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

*986CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny.
**Exhibit 12.1**

----

**Exhibit 12.1 – Section 906 Certification**

     The certification  set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission  solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title  18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant  to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the  Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Report”) to which this certification  is being filed as an exhibit.

     Jorge Luis Rodriguez,  the Chief Executive Officer and Norbert Glatt, the Chief Financial Officer of  Embratel Participações S.A., each certifies that, to the best  of his knowledge:

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of Embratel Participações S.A. |

     A signed original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form  within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section  906, has been provided to Embratel Participações S.A. and will  be retained by Embratel Participações S.A. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                 | /s/ Jorge Luis Rodriguez                          |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                                   |
|                 | Name: Jorge Luis RodriguezChief Executive Officer |
|                 |                                              |
|                 |                                              |
|                 | /s/ Norbert Glatt                                 |
|                 |                                                   |
|                 | Name: Norbert GlattChief Financial Officer        |
| Dated: June 27, 2003 |                                              |

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the possible impact of Hurricane Rita has forced the rescheduling of the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies meeting previously scheduled for Tuesday, September 27, 2005, at Waco Campus Study, Waco Convention Center, 100 Washington Avenue, Waco, Texas 76702, from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. The rescheduled meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 4, 2005, at the same location and time as noted above. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.

The agenda will include a discussion of the potential CARES Business Plan options for each site. The options have been developed by the VA contractor. The agenda will provide time for public comments on the options and for discussion of which options should be considered by the Secretary for further analysis and development in the next stage of the Business Plan Option development process.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meetings, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20024 by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at                     *jay.halpern@va.gov.*

Dated: September 23, 2005.

By direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-19523 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the amended item 3 on Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Kam, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/    Alex Kam
-------------------------------
Alex Kam
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 21, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Madison Avenue
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 180/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6224 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 180

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6224 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 180/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2019(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  11 ) | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 180/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2019(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  11 or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  22
  ) | 16 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 180/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2019(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  11 )

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

11 )

1

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 180/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2019(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  11 or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  22
  )

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC

11 or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC

22

)

16

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter C. Waller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Peter C. Waller    
|Peter C. Waller        
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 20, 2010
# Official Journal C 173/13 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 173 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4813 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 173

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4813 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 173/1 | Council conclusions on developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 173/2 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| 2005/C 173/3 | Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/E-1/37.370 — Sorbates (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) | 5 |
| 2005/C 173/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3844 — IBM/Global Value) (1) | 7 |
| 2005/C 173/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz) (1) | 7 |
| 2005/C 173/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3849 — IPR/Mitsui/Calpine UK) (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 173/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3763 — Carlsberg/DLG/Sejet JV) (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 173/1

Council conclusions on developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy

1

Commission

2005/C 173/2

Euro exchange rates

4

2005/C 173/3

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/E-1/37.370 — Sorbates (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

5

2005/C 173/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3844 — IBM/Global Value) (1)

7

2005/C 173/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz) (1)

7

2005/C 173/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3849 — IPR/Mitsui/Calpine UK) (1)

8

2005/C 173/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3763 — Carlsberg/DLG/Sejet JV) (1)

8

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 173/8 | NO-Oslo: operation of scheduled air services — 2005/S 115-113429 — Invitation to tender — Annulment | 9 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 173/8

NO-Oslo: operation of scheduled air services — 2005/S 115-113429 — Invitation to tender — Annulment

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN