alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-957-05 1910-BJ-5RK4] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to the plats of surveys of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

These surveys were executed at the request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and are necessary for the managements. The lands surveyed are: 

The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the south boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, the subdivision of certain sections, the survey of a portion of the present right bank of the Wind River, and the metes and bounds Survey of Parcel A, section 33, Township 4 North, Range 3 West, Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted September 29, 2005. 

Copies of the preceding described plat and field notes are available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page. 

Dated: October 4, 2005. 

John P. Lee, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services. 

[FR Doc. 05-20383 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### Helene L. Hassanin, Respondent, v Mohamed A. Hassanin, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 254]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gartenstein, J.), dated February 7, 2000, as distributed the marital assets.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant’s undergraduate degree in engineering was marital property and the plaintiff was entitled to a portion of his enhanced earning capacity *(see, McSparron v McSparron,*87 NY2d 275, 286; *O’Brien v O’Brien,*66 NY2d 576; *McNally v*
      *551
      *McNally,*251 AD2d 302, 303; *Vainchenker v Vainchenker,*242 AD2d 620; *Morales v Morales,*230 AD2d 895).

The plaintiff was entitled to recover $20,000 of her separate property before the equitable distribution of the marital residence *(see, Traut v Traut,*181 AD2d 671).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4142 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prohibit the use of 

benefits to purchase marijuana products, to amend part A of title IV 

of the Social Security Act to prohibit assistance provided under the 

program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy 

families from being accessed through the use of an electronic benefit 

transfer card at any store that offers marijuana for sale, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2014 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. LAMALFA, and Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prohibit 

the use of benefits to purchase marijuana products, to 

amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit assistance provided under the program of 

block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy 

families from being accessed through the use of an electronic benefit transfer card at any store that offers marijuana for sale, and for other purposes. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4142 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Welfare for Weed 

5 Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO FOOD AND NUTRITION ACT OF 

7 2008. 

8 Section 3(k) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

9 (7 U.S.C. 2012(k)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, marijuana 

10 products,’’ after ‘‘tobacco,’’. 

11 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTRONIC BENEFIT 

12 TRANSFER CARD TO ACCESS TANF ASSIST13 ANCE AT ANY STORE THAT OFFERS MARI14 JUANA FOR SALE. 

15 Section 408(a)(12)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

16 U.S.C. 608(a)(12)(A)) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii); 

18 (2) by striking the period at the end of clause 

19 (iii) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(iv) any establishment that offers 

22 marihuana (as defined in section 102(16) 

23 of the Controlled Substances Act) for 

24 sale.’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4142 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

3 take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   |         |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY K FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | May 11, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |         |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |         |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |         |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | May 11, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |         |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |         |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |         |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
#### Ruth Auman Norton, respondent, *v.*Mary M. Miller et al., appellants.

[Submitted October 25th, 1946.

Decided January 17th, 1947.]

*Mr. Francis J. Tanner,*for the appellants.

*Messrs. Berry <& Whitson,*for the respondent.

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Jayne, and reported at *133 N. J. Eq. 235.*

*For affirmance*— The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ibr, Perskie, Come, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Baeebrty, Dill, Breund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

*For reversal*— ISTone.
Exhibit 13.1
















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dr. Vishal Sikka, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
20-F of Infosys Limited for the year ended March 31, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Infosys Limited.



|                   | /s/
    Dr.VISHAL SIKKA                                                       
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                                               
|Date: May 18, 2016 | Dr. Vishal Sikka
        Chief Executive
        Officer and Managing Director
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM BERRY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1489

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lykins v. State, 894 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); 

Thomas v. State, 778 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4738 

To prohibit the use of Department of Defense military installations in the 

United States, its territories or possessions for the prosecution of individuals involved in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2010 

Mr. MCKEON (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. HUNTER, 

Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. TURNER, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. KLINE of Minnesota) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Department of Defense military installations in the United States, its territories or possessions 

for the prosecution of individuals involved in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4738 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF DEPARTMENT 

2 OF DEFENSE INSTALLATIONS IN THE UNITED 

3 STATES, ITS TERRITORIES OR POSSESSIONS 

4 FOR THE PROSECUTION OF INDIVIDUALS IN5 VOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TER6 RORIST ATTACKS. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—None of the installations owned, 

8 operated, or under the effective control of the Department 

9 of Defense that are located in the United States, its terri10 tories or possessions, may be used to commence or con11 tinue the prosecution in an Article III court of the United 

12 States of an individual described in subsection (b) for any 

13 offense that may be prosecuted by military commission 

14 under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as 

15 amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title 

16 XVIII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis17 cal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84))). 

18 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—An individual described 

19 in this subsection is an individual suspected of planning, 

20 authorizing, organizing, committing, or aiding the attacks 

21 on the United States and its citizens that occurred on Sep22 tember 11, 2001, who— 

23 (1) is not a citizen of the United States; and 

24 (2) is subject to jurisdiction under chapter 47A 

25 of title 10, United States Code (as so amended). 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4738 IH

1 (c) ARTICLE III COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DE2 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Article III court of the 

3 United States’’ means a court of the United States estab4 lished pursuant to Article III of the Constitution of the 

5 United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                       670
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,467,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 177,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,452,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,420,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,925,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,452,194
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               493,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            151,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,670)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Ty Rayshun DAVIS

No. 235P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Ty Rayshun Davis, for Davis, Ty Rayshun

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 13th of December 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Nash County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of December 2018."
Mary G. STILES, Plaintiff, v. SWINGING BRIDGE, LLC; Moena Gresham; Jack Gresham, Katryna G. Elmer; Keith Gresham; Joan Gresham, Defendants.

No. COA18-238

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 18, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
Exhibit 4.09

SCHEDULE OF OMITTED INSTRUMENTS OF AUTHORIZATION FOR THE USE OF RADIO FREQUENCY BLOCKS FOR 2G SERVICES

As these agreements are identical in every
case except for their reference number and the sector covered by them, we have, for ease of reference, filed only the relevant standard instrument of authorization approved by ANATEL and provided this schedule to indicate the authorizations that we
have omitted from filing as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F.



|1. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 01/2001, dated January 22, 2001.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 17/2007, dated December 7, 2007.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 66/2008, dated September 8, 2008.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 67/2008, dated September 8, 2008.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 24/2004, dated May 3, 2004.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 25/2004, dated May 3, 2004.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G Services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 26/2004, dated May 3, 2004.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Emory Seals, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed February 29, 1928.

*390
      *Philip*D. *Beall, John M. Coe*and *J. Leo Anderson,*for Plaintiff in Error,-

*Fred U. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Wi-iiteield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4705 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4705

 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $50 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2010

  Mr. McHenry (for himself, Mr. Kline of Minnesota, Mr. Gallegly, Ms. 
 Granger, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Posey, Mr. Gohmert, 
 Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Miller 
  of Florida, and Mr. Garrett of New Jersey) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $50 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``President Ronald Reagan $50 Bill 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF PRESIDENT REAGAN REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE 
              FACE OF $50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

    The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve 
Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The face of $50 Federal reserve notes printed after 
December 31, 2010, shall bear the likeness of President Ronald Wilson 
Reagan.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1844

JAMES ELLIS HALL, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01960-GJH)

Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ellis Hall, II, Appellant Pro Se. Janea Joi Hawkins, Matthew Frederick Nieman, 

Jason Alexander Ross, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Ellis Hall, II, appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion 

to dismiss Hall’s claims as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Hall v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 8:20-cv-01960-GJH (D. Md. 

July 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. 

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-20529 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
STATE v. Ty Rayshun DAVIS

235P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ty Rayshun Davis, for Davis, Ty Rayshun.

Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of July 2018 by Defendant for Judicial Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."