alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 





AMENDMENT
No. 6 TO


GREEN BALLAST,
INC.


8% SENIOR
SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


This
Amendment NO. 6, dated as of May 15, 2013 (the “Amendment”), to the 8% Senior Secured Convertible Note,
dated April 15, 2011, as amended from time to time (the “Gemini Note”), by Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
issued the Gemini Note to Gemini Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation (the “Holder”) on April 15,
2011, with a stated Maturity Date as defined therein of two (2) years following said date, the same being April 15, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holder desire to enter into this Amendment to extend the Maturity Date.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Company and the Holder
agree as follows:


 


1.                 
 The Maturity Date is hereby extended to and including July 15, 2013.


 


2.                 
Except to the extent amended hereby, the Gemini Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.                 
All capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in
the Gemini Note.


 


4.                 
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original document. Electronic
signatures, whether by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means, shall be treated as original signatures.


 


 


 


[Signature page
to follow.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first set forth above.


 





	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Kevin Adams
	 	
        Name:

        Title:
	Kevin Adams

Chief Executive Officer


 





	 	HOLDER:
	 	 
	 	GEMINI MASTER FUND, LTD.
	 	By: GEMINI STRATEGIES, LLC, as investment manager
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Steven Winters
	 	
        Name:

        Title:
	Steven Winters

Managing Member
Annah AWARTANI; Gilma Varinia Bonilla; Crystal Kim Parker, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION

No. 426P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Robert J. King, III, Daniel F.E. Smith, Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorneys at Law, for Awartani, Annah, et al.

Maureen D. Murray, Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 7th of September 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of September 2018 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United
States Code





I, Daniel
P. Hansen, the Chief Financial Officer of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC
(“Summit”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of
Summit for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Summit.





/s/
      Daniel P. HansenDaniel
      P. HansenChief
      Financial OfficerSummit
      Hotel Properties, LLCMay
      14, 2010
Exhibit 15.2


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
 The Board of Directors
 Infosys Technologies Limited:
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.333-32196) on Form S-8 and (No.333-160036) on Form F-3 of Infosys Technologies Limited of our reports dated May 6, 2011 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended March 31, 2011 and the related financial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011, which reports appear in the March 31, 2011 annual report on Form 20-F of Infosys Technologies Limited.
 
 
  KPMG
 Bangalore, India
 May 6, 2011
STATE of North Carolina v. David Lee DINKINS, Defendant.

No. COA18-138

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 15, 2019

DISMISSED.
Argued and submitted March 31,

reversed and remanded in part; otherwise affirmed May 15, 2003

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MARCIE MARIE DELANEY, aka Marcie Delaney, *Appellant.*

0006-34554; A112949

71 P3d 93

Rebecca Duncan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Kistler and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*718PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of theft of lost or mislaid property, ORS 164.065, possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and supplying contraband by introducing it into a correctional facility, ORS 162.185. She appeals only her convictions for supplying contraband. We reverse.

After defendant’s arrest on the theft charges, she was taken to the Multnomah County Detention Center. Later, she said that she needed medical attention, and she was taken to a hospital. While at those places, searches of her clothes and her person resulted in the discovery of tar heroin and crack cocaine. At a stipulated facts trial, the trial court rejected her arguments that she did not voluntarily introduce the drugs into the Detention Center. That was error. *State v. Tippetts,*180 Or App 350, 43 P3d 455 (2002). That conclusion does not change even if we assume, as the state appears to argue, that defendant’s actions were so inept that her arrest and the discovery of the contraband were readily foreseeable consequences.

Because defendant did not move for a judgment of acquittal, we reverse and remand for a new trial rather than reversing outright.

Convictions for supplying contraband reversed and remanded for new trial; otherwise affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1607-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated September 24, 2005, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2005:

    The parishes of Sabine and St. Landry for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for debris removal and emergency protective 
measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance program, 
including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-20288 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Jared James LEMM, Defendant.

No. COA18-135

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

NO PLAIN ERROR.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Correction To A Notice of Meetings

    With this Notice, AHRQ is publishing a correction to the following 
``Study Section'' meetings published in the Federal Register on 
September 15, 2005, Volume 70, Number 178, Page 54558, see also http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-18388.htm, reflect correct dates:
    <bullet> Name of Subcommittee: Health Research Dissemination and 
Implementation.
    <bullet> Date: October 20, 2005.
    <bullet> Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    <bullet> Date: October 27, 2005.
    <bullet> Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and 
Effectiveness Research.
    <bullet> Date: October 28, 2005.

    Dated: September 30. 2005.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 05-20250 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
Debra JONES, Employee, Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Employer, and Old Republic Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants

No. COA18-245

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of ISP Chemco Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sunil Kumar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neal E. Murphy, as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|/s/SUNIL KUMAR    |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:             |  | Sunil Kumar                                      
|Title:            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                  |  |                                                  
|Date:             |  | March 23, 2004                                   
|                  |  |                                                  
|/s/NEAL E. MURPHY |  |                                                  
|Name:             |  | Neal E. Murphy                                   
|Title:            |  | Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |                                                  
|Date:             |  | March 23, 2004                                   

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF**

**NITRO PETROLEUM INCORPORATED**

I, Larry Wise, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nitro Petroleum Incorporated (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at April 30, 2009, and the results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended April 30, 2009. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  June 19, 2009 |   | /s/  Larry Wise                       |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Larry Wise                            |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                  |
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Randall CORWIN, Appellant.

No. WD 61475.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 15, 2003.

Irene C. Karns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Randall Corwin appeals his conviction and sentence as a prior drug offender for possession of a controlled substance, specifically, methamphetamine, under section 195.202’ RSMo 2000. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
#### Paul Stevens La Charme and Flora Miller, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Dora A. Selleck, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Decision Filed April 23, 1928.

*772*Btapp, Vining & Ward*and *M. B. Bolst,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Price, Price, Neeley & Kehoe,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is, therefore, considered, and ordered by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and .the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
#### W. M. Cooey, Walter Cooey, and Mrs. Mattie Cooey, *Appellants,*v. J. W. Johnson, Tax Collector of Holmes County, Florida, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed May 15, 1928.

*947
      *James H. Finch,*for Appellant;

*Daniel*and *Blake,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree dissolving a temporary injunction and dismissing a bill of complaint brought to have decreed to be invalid an assessment of county school warrants for State and county taxes for the year 1924, and to enjoin the collection of the tax..

It appears that the county tax assessor had not assessed the county school warrants, and when the tax rolls were presented to the county commissioners for equalizing purposes the county commissioners instructed the tax assessor to make the particular assessments of county school warrants against the complainants below. The complainants applied to the county commissioners for relief which was denied. The authority of the county commissioners is to equalize assessments as made by the tax assessor. The existing statutes require assessments of personal property to include ‘ ‘ goods and chattels, moneys and effects * * * all debts due or to become due from solvent debtors, whether on account, contract, note or otherwise. ’ ’ The assessments in this case of county school warrants as to amount and value were made at the direction of the county commissioners and not by the Tax Assessor in the exercise of his judgment as the law contemplates; and even if it is the policy of the law and the intent of the statute that county obligations should be taxed as debts due or to become due on contract, note or otherwise, thereby making it necessary for counties to pay a higher rate of interest for money borrowed, the record in this case shows an intentional unjust discrimination against the complainant in that practically no other similar or other evidences of indebtedness are assessed in the county, and that the complainants were singled out of a class who hold evidences of debts but who are not assessed *948on them, and specific assessments were made against complainants in the manner here indicated. This is clearly contrary to the policy and intent of the statutes and such assessments are invalid and a collection of the tax should be enjoined.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Environmental Control Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Bishop, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November 13, 2009








By:       /s/ Gary Bishop


Gary Bishop


Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR EACH OF YEARS IN THE THREE YEAR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     116,599,486              98,874,963
<SECURITIES>                                 3,177,938                 177,938
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,741,002              20,358,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                   507,487                 301,930
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,089,296             124,666,964
<PP&E>                                      78,208,914              43,618,274
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,654,142              19,717,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             219,282,870             153,657,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,146,349              14,048,034
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     8,593,510               8,592,137
<OTHER-SE>                                 189,543,011             131,017,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               219,282,870             153,657,596
<SALES>                                    203,443,754             120,955,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           212,482,546             122,492,224
<CGS>                                      111,080,546              65,331,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              142,944,701              98,082,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               205,557                (91,869)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             69,537,845              22,323,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,193,317               4,877,650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         61,344,528              17,446,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                61,344,528              17,446,088
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.93                    0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93                    0.28


</TABLE>
#### Long-Pasley Lumber Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. F. M. Hawkins and Son, a Co-Partnership, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 4, 1928.

*John B. Willis*and *W. S. Broome,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*C. B. Layton*and *Fred D. Bryant,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.