alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Juan Antonia MILLER

2PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 2, 2018

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Juan Antonia.

John G. Batherson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Ivy Johnson, Attorney at Law, Ian Mance, Attorney at Law, for Beloved Community Center of Greensboro.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of February 2018 by State of NC to Provide to this Court Copies of an Excerpt from State's Exhibit 2:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of February 2018."
Order entered Febr uary 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00272

- CR
VALENTIN CARUS, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 63142

- U



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On January 28, 2015, we granted the motion of Lori Ordiway to withdraw as counsel and ordered the trial court to appoint new counsel for appellant

. We have received the trial court’s order ap pointing Allan Fishburn as appellant’s attorney. Accordingly, w e DIRECT the Clerk to
list Allan Fishburn as appellant’s attorney of record. We note that appellant’s brief was filed on December 8, 2014, and the State has neither
filed a brief nor filed a t imely extension motion seeking an extension of time to file its brief. The appeal has been set at issue and will be submitted in due course.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Allan
Fishburn an d the Dallas Cou nty District Attorney’s Office.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WAYNE ERVIN LAMBERT; ERVIN WAYNE LAMBERT, JR., Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-405) Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellants. Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lambert , No. CR-92-405 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 14, 2018

Order 

Clerk

December 14, 2018

158285

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158285

v COA: 341105

Berrien CC: 2017-001164-FH

NICHOLAS JAMES PATTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to 

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for 

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.
STATE of North Carolina v. Larry CHAVIS

No. 150P03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Larry Chavis, for Chavis, Larry.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of June 2018 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of June 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of June 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
EIGINAL 

\ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 24-0221 

SEAN MICHAEL BELL, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, 

Montana State Prison, 

Respondent. 

ALEC 

APR 2 3 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Representing himself, Sean Michael Bell has filed a "Petition For Mont. Const. 

Art. II § 22 Relieffl" with this Court. In three, handwritten sentences, Bell requests that 

this Court "Order the Prison to Shur off the speaker in his cell wall because the sepeaker is 

not allowing him to sleep. He alleges cruel and unusual punishment and represents that he 

has asked the prison staff to turn the speaker off. 

Bell's remedy is not with this Court. This Court may exercise its original 

jurisdiction over writs "commenced . . . to obtain writs of habeas corpus, injunction, review 

or certiorari, mandate, quo warranto, and other remedial writs or orders," and "conducted 

in the manner prescribed by the applicable sections of the Montana Code Annotated for the 

conduct of such or analogous proceedings and by these rules." M. R. App. P. 14(2). Bell 

has not presented a request for any type of viable writ upon which this Court may exercise 

its original jurisdiction. M. R. App. P. 14(1). 

Bell's remedy is with the Montana State Prison. He should avail himself of the 

Department of Corrections policies, such as submitting an Offender/Staff Request form 

under DOC Policy 3.3.5 or filing a grievance under DOC Policy 3.3.3, conceming the use 

or volume of the speaker in his cell wall. Bell should seek relief through these 

administrative policies. 

04/23/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0221
Bell's request for relief is not cognizable under any extraordinary relief, pursuant to 

M. R. App. P. 14(2). Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Bell's Petition For Mont. Const. Art. II § 22 Relief is 

DISMISSED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED as of the Order's date. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel 

of record and to Sean Mic ael Bell. 

DATED this of April, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

2
Exhibit 10.9

 

Donald F. Corcoran

President & Chief Executive Officer

MethylGene Inc.

7220 Frederick-Banting, Montreal, Quebec

H4S 2A1 Canada

 

August 8th, 2009

 

Re:          Extension of Research Collaboration and License Agreement dated March 25, 2008 (the “Agreement”)

 

Dear Mr. Donald F. Corcoran,

 

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that Otsuka hereby exercises its option to extend the Research Term for six (6) months pursuant to Section 3.2 (a) of the Agreement.  As MethylGene and Otsuka have discussed in the meeting held on July 16th, 2009 in Montreal, Otsuka has proposed to MethylGene the extension of the notice period for thirty (30) days.  The proposal was put on held for further consideration by MethylGene until August 5th, 2009; therefore suspending the said notice period.

 

With this notice, the Agreement has been extended on the same terms and conditions as stipulated in the Agreement until March 24th, 2010, without prejudice to Otsuka’s option for extension of additional six (6) months.

 

Sincerely Yours,

 

 

Minoru Ikada

General Manager & Operating Officer

Division of Dermatologicals & Ophthalmologicals

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Col., Ltd.

29, Kanda-Tsukasamachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8535 Japan
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk December 14 , 2018

15 8 285

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 8 285

v COA: 34 1105

Berrien CC: 2017

- 001164

- FH

NICHOLAS JAMES PATTON

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

____________________________________ _ _/

On order of the C ourt , the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice

.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 5, 2009

s0602 

# Order

June 5, 2009

138912

_____________ _______________ _____________

In re BLAKE SAMUEL COLLINS and NEVEAH HARRIS, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 138912 COA: 288182 Wayne CC Family Division: 08-479017-NA CRYSTAL JEWELL COLLINS, Respondent-Appellant,

and

MICHAEL FORREST FLETCHER and DEPLURI HARRIS, Respondents.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00565- CV

In re Jason Dale Whitlock

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TO M GREEN CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator J ason Dale Whit lock, an inmate appea ring pro se, has filed a petition for

wr i t o f m an d amus. I n the petition, Whit lock asks this Court to order the 391st District Court o f
Tom Gree n County

to rule on Whitl ock’s “ motion to compel for spee dy chapte r 59 hea

ring .” 1
Mandamus is an extraordinary reme dy that issues only to corr ect a clea r abu se
of discretion when there i s n o adequate reme dy by appea l. When a motion is proper ly filed and 2 pending befor e the trial court, the act of considering and ruling on that motion is a ministerial ac t,
and manda

mus may issue to compel the trial court to act. Howeve r, t he relator has the burden to 3 provide the r eviewing court with a r ecor d sufficie nt to establish his rig ht to mandamus re lief. To 4

This is appar ently a ref

ere nce to Chapter 59 of t h e T ex as C o de of Criminal Procedur e, 1 rela ting to the forf

eiture of contra

band. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 59.01 et seq. I n the motion, W h itlock is demanding a hear ing in response to what he char acte rizes as “the State’s at t em p t t o illega lly take a nd keep his money

in the amount of $1,965.00.”
In re Prude ntial Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W .3d 124, 135-36 (Te x . 2004). 2
In re Chave

z , 62 S.W .3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig . proce eding ). 3
W alker v. Pack

er , 827 S.W .2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992 ) (orig

. proce eding ); In re Mendoza , 4 131 S.W .3d 167, 168 (Tex. App.—S an Antonio 2004, orig

. proce eding ); see Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)( 1).obtain mandamus relief compelling a trial court to rule on a proper ly fil ed m o t i o n , a rela tor must provide a rec ord demonstrating that the trial court: (1) had a leg al duty to rule on the motion; (2) was
asked to rule on the motion; and (3) either ref used or failed to rule on the motion within a rea sonable
time. W h i t l o ck has failed to provide such a rec ord here

. Acc ording ly , the petition for writ of 5 6
mandamus is denied. 7

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield
Filed: Oc tober 28, 2014

In re Layton , 257 S.W .3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig . proce eding ); In re 5 Blakene y , 254 S.W .3d 659, 662 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig . proce eding ).
See Blakene

y , 2 5 4 S

. W .3d at 662; In re Davidson , 153 S.W .3d 490, 491 (Tex. 6 App.—Amar illo 2004, orig. proc eeding ); Chavez , 62 S.W .3d at 228.
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

. Whit lock has also filed a motion for leave to file his petition 7 for wr it of mandamus. No such le ave is re quired. We dismiss that mot ion as moot.
2
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2018

Ms. Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, for Walters, Christina Shea

Mr. Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Durham, Attorney at Law, for Walters, Christina Shea

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Raleigh, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Carrboro, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Mr. Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers

Ms. Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Irving Joyner, Durham, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Ms. Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense

Mr. Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Ms. Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Mr. W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Mr. Burton Craige, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Jeremy M. Falcone, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to Not Require the Payment of Additional Pro Hac Vice Fees:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------





           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
       ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Duravest, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company of Form
10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that: (1) the 10-KSB Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-KSB Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                        DURAVEST, INC.

Dated:  April 29, 2003                 By: /s/ Patti Cooke
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Patti Cooke, President and Principal
                                            Executive, Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors

East Carolina Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-77689 and 333-151210) on Forms S-8 and theregistration statement (No. 333-157574) on Form S-3 of ECB Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ECB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which reports appear in ECB Bancorp, Inc.’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC 

 

Greenville, North Carolina 

March 15, 2011
IN RE: Charles Everette HINTON

449P11-20

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 11, 2018

Mr. Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of September 2018 by Plaintiff for Inquiry into Restraints on Liberty and Privileges of the Writ of Habeas Corpus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of September 2018."
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4639 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the adoption of a 

military working dog by the family of a deceased or seriously wounded 

member of the Armed Forces who was the handler of the dog. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

adoption of a military working dog by the family of 

a deceased or seriously wounded member of the Armed 

Forces who was the handler of the dog. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corporal Dustin Lee 

5 Memorial Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4639 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADOPTION OF MILITARY WORKING DOG BY FAMILY 

2 OF DECEASED OR SERIOUSLY WOUNDED 

3 MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO WAS 

4 THE DOG’S HANDLER. 

5 Section 2583(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Military ani8 mals’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(2) For purposes of making a determination under 

12 subsection (a)(2), unusual or extraordinary circumstances 

13 may include situations in which the handler of a military 

14 working dog is killed in action, dies of wounds received 

15 in action, or is so seriously wounded in action that the 

16 member will (or most likely will) receive a medical dis17 charge. If the Secretary of the military department con18 cerned determines that an adoption is justified in such a 

19 situation, the military working dog shall be made available 

20 for adoption only by the immediate family of the mem21 ber.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE> 1

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
             For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

                  Commission File No. 333-59837


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.


      HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOBILE REVOLVING TRUST I, SERIES 1998-1
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


                 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                 (Master Servicer of the Trust)
      (Exact name as specified in Master Servicer's charter)



            DELAWARE                   Not Applicable.
(State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of Master            Identification Number of
Servicer)                          Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Master Servicer)


    Master Servicer's telephone number, including area code:
                         (847)564-5000


<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2


                      SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Master Servicer has duly
caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Household
Automobile Revolving Trust I, Series 1998-1 by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.




                               HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Master Servicer of and on behalf of the

                          HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOBILE REVOLVING TRUST I,
                                        SERIES 1998-1
                                         (Registrant)




Date:  May 5, 2000       By: /s/ J. W. Blenke
                                 J. W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary













<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3

                           Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99            Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual
              Servicing Report dated April 26, 2000.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-
90820, 33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services, Inc. on
Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-20499 of PennFed Financial
Services, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated August 27, 2004, September 12
2005, as to the statements of cash flows and Note V (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption
of FASB Interpretation No. 46 and the restatement described in Note V),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennFed Financial Services, Inc.
for the year ended June 30, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 12, 2005