alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>		       EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter WCM
L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	        Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2009
In the MATTER OF: G.L.H.

No. COA17-1406

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
IN RE: J.B.

335P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2018

Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, for J.B.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, Janelle Varley, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of October 2018 by Juvenile to Appoint the Appellate Defender:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of October 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy O'Brian TERRY

No. COA17-998

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Albert E. Hickman, the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Environmental Control Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental Control Corp. for the three months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Environmental Control Corp.

Dated  February 15, 2007.

/s/ Albert E. Hickman                                                    

Albert E. Hickman

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
| 1. | Infosmart      Group Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (“Infosmart BVI”) – wholly      owned subsidiary of the Company |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Portabello      Global Limited, a British Virgin Island company – wholly owned      subsidiary of Infosmart BVI |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Info      Smart International Enterprises Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Info Smart      International”) – wholly owned subsidiary ofInfosmart  BVI |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Infoscience      Media Global Limited, a British Virgin Islands company – wholly owned      subsidiary of Infosmart BVI |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | Info      Smart Technology Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Info Smart      Technology) – wholly owned subsidiary of Infosmart  BVI |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | Infoscience      Media Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Infoscience Media”) – wholly owned      subsidiary of Info Smart Technology |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 7. | Discobra      Industria E Comercio de Eletro Eletronica Ltda, a Brazilian company      – 99.42% owned subsidiary of Infoscience  Media |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EX-10.27




 Exhibit 10.27 
 Tidewater Inc. 
 Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements

 as of April 1, 2012 
 For service as a non-management director, compensation is as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 An annual cash retainer of $60,000; 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional annual cash retainer of $20,000 for the lead director; 



 

	 	•	 	 An additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for the chair of each of the audit committee and the compensation committee, and $10,000 for the chair of
each of the nominating and corporate governance committee and the finance and investment committee; 


  

	 	•	 	 Committee meeting fees of $1,500 per meeting; 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual grant of deferred stock units under the Directors Deferred Stock Units Plan valued at date of grant at $115,000;



  

	 	•	 	 Reimbursement of reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors and
its committees; 


  

	 	•	 	 Participation in the company’s Gift Matching Program under which the company matches a director’s contribution to an educational institution
or foundation up to $5,000 per year; and 


  

	 	•	 	 For directors who were members of the board prior to March 31, 2006, accrued benefits under the now frozen Non-Qualified Pension Plan for Outside
Directors of Tidewater.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      37,232,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,744,878
<PP&E>                                       1,921,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                (388,017)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,232,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,940,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       242,796
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,232,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,305,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             960,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,345,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,345,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,345,436)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.04)
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. James Franklin MCCLELLAND

No. COA17-1231

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Karl F. Betz, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and
            results of operations.


Date: November 10, 2005                /s/ Karl F. Betz
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Karl F. Betz
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer


<PAGE>  24
It Le our 0 inion that uralsr the fkotrr etstsd

the cm&title ia.entl 8 lad to halt oo&te Iron t&o county tbr thst portion

or~timethe drfm?~~t aatually asrusd ia jail. Far sample, ff the derendant'e flnn aa4 caste ClCtOUllt~

to #met% end he BorVOd tlo dGy# Gnd the ounstable*e

fees amountedto @.tJO,the mnatabls muld ba entftlad

to raedmi fxom the couunty the mm of SO o*nte (8 hi8 helf oostaunder ArtlelslOZ5,V. A. F. C. Pa

raleaeo hiw fm the ';bymstot the halam br his rh and imft8..
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN T. KENNEDY

, Appellant,

v.

ALISON KENNEDY

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1080

[ February 4, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Maxine Cheesman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502002DR001829XXXMB FA

.

John T. Kennedy, Brasil, pro se.

Jeffrey Begens of Law Offices of Jeffrey Begens, P.A., Bonita Springs,

for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain CommunicationsCorporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

 

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2006 the (“Report”), fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUN 17 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DURAND K. DICKERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LEAVITT RENTALS, a Kansas business;

PAUL LEAVITT; DEBORAH M.

LEAVITT; G. RONALD BATES, JR.;

PATRICK E. HENDERSON; PHILLIP

LACEY; DAVID J. KING, in their

official and personal capacities;

DUNCAN, SENECAL LAW OFFICES,

CHARTERED, a Kansas law firm;

CROW, CLOTHIER & BATES, a Kansas

law firm; BOARD OF COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS OF

LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, a

municipal corporation; WAYNE

ELDRIDGE; DONALD NAVINSKY;

ROBERT ADAMS, in their official and

personal capacities; JIM MURRY;

SHIRLEY PENDERGRAFT; MICHAEL

WAITE; HERBERT NYE, in their official

and personal capacities,

 Defendants-Appellees,

No. 98-3053

(D.C. No. 97-2584-EEO)

(District of Kansas)
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

- 2 -

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Durand K. Dickerson appeals from the dismissal of his pro se civil rights

complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. Mr.

Dickerson sought damages in the sum of $37.5 million alleging constitutional violations

committed by the defendants in state court actions filed against Mr. Dickerson. In a

lengthy and carefully analyzed memorandum and order, the district court thoroughly and

correctly treated each of Mr. Dickerson’s claims. Our review of the record and the

district court’s disposition and the briefs filed in this court lead us to conclude the district
- 3 -

court did not err in any respect. Indeed, we find Mr. Dickerson’s claims and his

arguments patently frivolous. Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the district court in

its memorandum and order, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
#### Margaret Streicker, Appellant, v Adir Rent A Car Inc. et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 562]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about May 17, 2000, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on liability and granted defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to submit to additional physical examinations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied, there being issues of fact as to whether defendant driver was faced with an emergency, and, if so, whether his actions were reasonable within that context *(see, Kuci v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*88 NY2d 923). The motion court also properly directed plaintiff to submit to physical examinations by an orthopedist and rehabilitation-medicine specialist, even though she had already submitted to an examination by a neurologist, where the injuries she claims are both orthopedic and neurologic in nature and allegedly will interfere with her pursuit of an architectural career, and it does not appear that her prosecution of the action will be prejudiced by the additional examinations *(see, Dominguez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*168 AD2d 376). We would also note prejudice caused to defendants by plaintiffs failure to timely and formally object to their notice, which demanded all three examinations, in the manner required by CPLR 3122 (a). Had plaintiff made known her objection to being examined by more than one of the specialists listed on the notice before her examination by the neurologist was conducted, defendants would not have lost the opportunity to decide which of the three specialists they wanted. Concur — Williams, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation, the general partner of CarrAmerica Realty Operating
Partnership, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas A. CarrThomas A. CarrChief Executive Officer (of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation,
the General Partner of CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P.)November 4, 2004/s/ Stephen E. RiffeeStephen E. RiffeeChief Financial Officer (of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation, the General Partner of CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P.)November 4, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. Davonn Jerome BELK, Defendant.

No. COA 17-1331

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

NO ERROR.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Robinson * From the 118th District

Family Entities, Court of Howard County,

 Trial Court No. 48,534.

No. 11-12-00258-CV * August 29, 2014

 * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Bailey, J., and McCall, sitting

 by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court's opinion, the 

order of the trial court is reversed, and the injunction is dissolved. This cause is 

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s 

opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the 

Robinson Family Entities – Geneva Legg, receiver.
James E. BREWER, Employee, Plaintiff, v. FIRST STOP CORE & BATTERY, LLC, Employer, Riverport Insurance Company, Carrier (Berkley Assigned Risk Services, Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA17-424

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

JLA / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AK HLAS NA I M GEORGE, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 71167 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 759- 515 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A khl a s N a i m G e or ge , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I r a q, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on 

# FI LED DE C 23 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ LA/ Res ea r ch 06- 71167 2 j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve ju risd icti o n u n d er8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r ev iew fo r s ub stan ti al ev id en ce an IJ ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf

in d in g . D on v. G on zales , 4 7 6 F .3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the I J ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on because the contra di ct ory a cc ou nt s of the m i stre atm entG eorge s uffe re d, coup l ed w i th the di ff

er i ng ac coun t s of herdet ent i on s and i nt errogat i on s are m at er i al d is c r e p a n c ie s th a t g o to th e h e art o f h e ra s y lu m c la im . See L i v . A s h c r o ft , 378 F . 3d 959, 962 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . I n the abs e nc e of c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , G e or ge ’ s a s y l um a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 1153, 1 1 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . B e c aus e G e or ge ’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the t e s t i m onythe a ge nc yf ound notc r e di bl e , a nd s he poi nt s t o no e vi de nc e s how i ng i ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nots he w ill b e to rtu r e din I r a q , h e rC A T c la im a ls o f a ils . I d. a t 1 1 5 6 - 5 7 . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Sun  River  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ending April 30, 2009 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"). I, Redgie Green,  President of the company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Redgie Green
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Redgie Green, President
Date: August 13, 2009