alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008327EN.01002601.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 30 October 2008 — France v Commission

(Case T-257/07 R II)

(Application for interim measures - Health measures - Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 - Eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balancing of interests)

Prima facie

(2008/C 327/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, R. Loosli-Surrans, A.-L. During and G. de Bergues, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Nolin and A. Bordes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: C. Gibbs and I. Rao, later by I. Rao, acting as Agents, assisted by T. Ward, barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annexe VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ 2008 L 202, p. 11), in so far as it introduces, into Chapter A of Annex VII point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annexe VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies is suspended until judgment has been given in the main action in so far as it introduces, into Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of 22 May 2001 point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annexe VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies is suspended until judgment has been given in the main action in so far as it introduces, into Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of 22 May 2001 point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4;

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--International Electrotechnical Commission 
Technical Committee Subcommittee 37B

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International 
Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee Subcommittee 37B (``IEC 
TC SC 37B''), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers 
Association (``NEMA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization: International 
Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee Subcommittee 37B, 
Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of IEC TC SC 37B's standards 
development activities are: related to components used in low voltage 
surge protection devices. IEC TC SC 37B currently maintains a series of 
IEC 61643 standards dealing with general requirements for these 
components in different types of surge protection devices. The 
standards developed by IEC TC SC 37B are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1983 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cassandra Stubbs, Attorney at Law, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, David Weiss, Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation of NC.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Citizens Excluded from Jury Service Based on Race.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Attorney at Law, Alex T. Haskell, Attorney at Law, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Retired Members of the NC Judiciary.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 30th of April 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of May 2018."

*666Defendant shall have up to and including the 2nd day of July 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### STATE ex rel. Edward W. LEE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2345.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Lee, Edward, W.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 417-748; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2001 K 2160.

Denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Kirton, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 604]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), imposed June 16, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence *(see, People v Moissett,*76 NY2d 909; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was imposed, was excessive *(see, People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825; *People v Brathwaite,*63 NY2d 839). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 25 
          - [IB Docket No. 00-248 and CC Docket No. 86-496, FCC 05-63] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule, announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission announces that adopted rule revisions to streamline the procedures for non-routine earth station applications. Certain rules contained new or modified information requirements and were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 2, 2005.                     

# DATES:

The revisions to 47 CFR 25.115, 25.130, 25.131, 25.132, 25.133, 25.134, 25.151, 25.154, 25.209, 25.211, 25.212, 25.220, and 25.277, published at 70 FR 32249, June 2, 2005, became effective on September 15, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Spaeth, Assistant Division Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, at (202) 418-1539. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On September 15, 2005, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection contained in §§ 25.115, 25.130, 25.131, 25.132, 25.133, 25.134, 25.151, 25.154, 25.209, 25.211, 25.212, 25.220, and 25.277, pursuant to OMB Control No. 3060-0678. Accordingly, the information collection requirements contained in these rules became effective on September 15, 2005. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25

      - Satellites

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-19517 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
STATE of North Carolina, v. Jeremy Lee STEPHENS, Defendant.

No. COA16-714

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

NO ERROR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147327

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147327

COA: 302711

Macomb CC: 2008-005143-FC

HERBERT JAMAL WITHERSPOON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In the MATTER OF: A.L.H.

No. COA16-1251

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.
#### STATE ex rel. Christopher HILL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Hill, Christopher; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 99-6339; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-648.

Denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Michaele, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 32]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), rendered January 20, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 9 to 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the court’s finding that defendant’s statements were not the product of an unlawful detention *(see, People v Li,*235 AD2d 211, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1037). Defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the precinct to assist in their investigation, and was never frisked, handcuffed, or restrained in any way. The interview was relatively brief and nothing in the tone of the questions suggested that defendant was not free to leave.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
#### Joan M. HOTOP, Appellant, v. Steven PINGEL and Louise Pingel, his wife, Respondents.

No. ED 81397.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

Aug. 12, 2003.

Terry R. Rottler, Ste. Genevieve, MO, for appellant.

Thomas L. Hoeh, Perryville, MO, for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Joan Hotop appeals the judgment in favor of Steven and Louise Pingel on her claim seeking a declaration that she is the owner of a private road which adjoins her property. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.1 An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. *449The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Although our review of the judgment and the legal file indicates we have jurisdiction over this appeal, we note that neither party has included a jurisdictional statement in their brief as required by Rule 84.04(b).
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Dennis M. Terry                               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Dennis M. Terry                                   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | By:    | /s/ Darlene F. McDonald                           |
|   |   | Darlene F. McDonald                               |
|   |   | Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

	In connection with the quarterly report of Venus Beauty Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Sarah Boothe, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Sarah Boothe			

Sarah Boothe 

Chief Executive and Financial Officer 

March 29, 2005

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 **
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2018

Mr. Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Mr. Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Raleigh, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Carrboro, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers

Ms. Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Irving Joyner, Durham, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Ms. Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Assocation for Public Defense

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Mr. Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Mr. W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Mr. Burton Craige, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Jeremy M. Falcone, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State *684The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Paul F. Khoury Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."

Beasley, J. recused
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of October 3, 2005: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, October 6, 2005 at 2:30 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 6, 2005 will be: 

Formal orders of private investigations; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and 

Adjudicatory matters. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: September 27, 2005. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-19698 Filed 9-28-05; 11:40 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.2

                         [ERNST & YOUNG LLP LETTERHEAD]


                         Report of Independent Auditors

Board of Directors
WFS Financial Inc

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the 
consolidated statement of financial condition of WFS Financial Inc and 
Subsidiaries (WFS) as of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then 
ended, and have issued our report thereon dated January 25, 1999.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to 
believe that WFS failed to, in all material aspects, comply with the terms, 
covenants, provisions or conditions of the Sale and Servicing Agreements for 
WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc. dated March 1, 1998, June 1, 1998 or November 1, 
1998 between Bankers Trust Company, Chase Manhattan Bank, and WFS insofar as 
they relate to accounting matters. However, it should be noted that our audit 
was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of noncompliance.

This report is intended for the use and information of the Board of Directors 
and management of WFS, Bankers Trust Company and Chase Manhattan Bank and 
should not be used for any other purposes.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

January 25, 1999