alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2009 |  | /s/ James A. Thomas    
|                        |  | James A. Thomas        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §
1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AVOKI v. EAGLE ADJUSTING SERV. INC., et al.

381P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Francisco K. Avoki, for Avoki, Francisco K., et al.

Veronique K. Pongo.

Mica Nguyen Worthy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, for Eagle Adjusting Serv., Inc., et al.

Walter M. Dennis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Eagle Adjusting Serv., Inc.

Robert M. Rubin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of November 2017 by Defendants (Eagle Adjusting Services, Inc. and Jsoh Taylor):

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Robert C. Montgomery, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State of NC.

G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney, for State.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Jay H. Ferguson, James E. Ferguson, II, Cassandra Stubbs, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Donald H. Beskind, Kenneth J. Rose, David Weiss, Brian W. Stull, Attorneys at Law, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Burton Craige, Narendra K. Ghosh, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorneys at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, James P. Cooney, III, Gregory B. Craig, Alex T. Haskell, Attorneys at Law, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Laws, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Jin Hee Lee, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Madeline J. Cohen Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."
Section 906 CEO Certification



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodolfo Prieto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    RODOLFO PRIETO                 
|Rodolfo Prieto Chief Executive Officer
|                                      
|November 11, 2005
In the MATTER OF: C.C.

No. COA17-654

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Marcus Marcel SMITH

290A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Smith, Marcus Marcel.

Adrian Dellinger, Associate Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of September 2017 by Defendant to Dismiss or Clarify the Scope of Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Alan L. Hoover, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Alan L. Hoover
--------------------------------
Alan L. Hoover, Acting President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       16
#### S.R.G., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-4961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 1, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Anne Sheer Weiner and Tiffany Gatesh Fearing, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

DAVIS, Judge.

S.R.G. challenges the disposition order of the circuit court adjudicating her delinquent for an act of criminal mischief involving vandalizing an automobile. She specifically maintains that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient circumstantial evidence to prove identity. We agree and reverse.

> We realize that where the only proof of guilt is circumstantial, a conviction may not be sustained no matter how strongly the evidence may suggest guilt, unless the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. The accepted standard of review, however, is not whether the evidence failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt, but whether there was substantial, competent evidence for [the factfinder] to so conclude.

*Bradford v. State,*460 So.2d 926, 931 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (citations omitted); *see also Porter v. State,*752 So.2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Following our de novo review of the instant record, *see Pagan v. State,*830 So.2d 792, 803 (Fla.2002), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2278, 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003), we conclude that the State did not provide competent, substantial evidence for the trial court to conclude that S.R.G. was the individual who vandalized the automobile. Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication of delinquency.

Reversed.

STRINGER, J., and SCHEB, JOHN M., Senior Judge, concur.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 30, 2014

No. 04-14-00303-CR

Santos GUEVARA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5336

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The record in this appeal was due May 12, 2014, but has not been filed. The court 

reporter filed a notification of late record stating the record was not filed because appellant 

Santos Guevara Jr. had neither requested nor paid for the record. In response, appellant’s 

attorney has filed a motion for a free appellate record. The motion is supported by the affidavit

of appellant’s wife and states that it was served on both the trial court clerk and the court 

reporter.

Rule 20.2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a motion for a free appellate 

record in a criminal appeal be filed “[w]ithin the time for perfecting the appeal.” This time has 

passed. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice and to expedite a decision in the case, we apply 

Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to allow the late motion and affidavit of 

indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2; Turner v. State, 71 S.W.3d 928 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no 

pet.).

We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. We order the trial court to 

hold a hearing on or before June 20, 2014, to determine whether appellant is able to pay for the 

appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2. The trial court must allow appellant to present 

evidence, telephonically or otherwise, to sustain his assertion of indigence. The court must 

further give notice of the date and time of the hearing to the trial court clerk, court reporter, and 

the State. 

If the trial court finds Guevara is indigent, the trial court is ordered to direct the Gillespie 

County District Clerk and the court reporter to prepare the appellate record without charge to 
appellant and to file the record within thirty days of the date of the hearing. The trial court may 

also, if requested, appoint appellate counsel.

We further order the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

issue of Guevara’s indigence, to direct the clerk to file them in this court, and to direct the court 

reporter to prepare and file a record of the indigence hearing. The findings and conclusions and 

record of the hearing are due in this court within five days of the hearing. 

We order the clerk of this court to send copies of this order, to the trial court, the clerk, 

and court reporter.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 64/17 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4917 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4917 March 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 064/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 064/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4106 — Isola/Polyclad) (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 064/3 | Withdrawal of Commission proposals following screening for their general relevance, their impact on competitiveness and other aspects | 3 |
| 2006/C 064/4 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 064/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 064/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4106 — Isola/Polyclad) (1)

2

2006/C 064/3

Withdrawal of Commission proposals following screening for their general relevance, their impact on competitiveness and other aspects

3

2006/C 064/4

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Ray TWINE

No. COA17-1094

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR.
Tracy GAUNT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Doris O'Shields Robertson, Deceased, Petitioner, v. GUY M. BEATY & COMPANY, INC., and Berkley Insurance Company of the Carolinas, Respondents.

No. COA17-851

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

AFFIRMED.
exhibit10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







May 1, 2013







Mr. Dennis Thatcher


Mission Broadcasting, Inc.


30400 Detroit Road Suite 304


Westlake, OH  44145







Re:  Shared Services Agreement and  Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time for WAWV-TV, Terre Haute, IN







Dear Dennis:







Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) are parties to (1) a Shared Services Agreement (the “SSA”) for broadcast station WAWV-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana (“WAWV”), dated as of May 9, 2003 (as amended), the initial term of which expires as of May 8, 2013, and (2) an Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time with respect to WAWV (the “JSA” and, collectively with the SSA, the “Agreements”), also dated as of May 9, 2003, the initial term of which also expires as of May 8, 2013.  Pursuant to Section 7 of the SSA and Section 1 of the JSA, the term of each Agreement shall be extended for an additional ten (10) year term, unless either party provides at least six months notice of its intent to terminate such Agreement.







This letter is to confirm that neither Nexstar nor Mission has provided the requisite notice of termination for either Agreement; and it is the parties’ intent that the SSA and JSA continue in effect pursuant to the terms thereof (as amended from time to time).  Accordingly, Nexstar and Mission hereby agree to extend the terms of the SSA and JSA for a period of ten years.  Please confirm Mission’s agreement by signing the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter and returning it to my attention.







Thank you.







Sincerely,







/s/ Elizabeth Ryder


Elizabeth Ryder


Vice President & General Counsel












Acknowledged and Agreed:


Mission Broadcasting, Inc.







By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher


Title:  President
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Stern, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | March 31, 2009 |  | /S/ Danny Stern
Danny SternChief Executive Officer
| | -------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
PINE v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. #1552, et al.

335A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 15, 2018

Holly M. Stott, M. Duane Jones, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, Linda Stephens, Attorney at Law, for Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. #1552, et al.

David A. Shelby, Attorney at Law, Salisbury, for Pine, Patricia.

Vernon Sumwalt, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of March 2018 by Plaintiff:

*235"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of March 2018."
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Notices 58197 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 05–36] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 05–36 with 

attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: September 29, 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

58198 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Notices 


EN05OC05.035</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Notices 58199 


EN05OC05.036</GPH>
58200 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–19899 Filed 10–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


EN05OC05.037</GPH>