alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
pedo_ex1011.htm


Exhibit 10.11


 









May 15, 2013







South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC


1416-B Campbell Road, Suite 204


Houston, Texas 77055


 


Attn.: Sean Fitzgerald








	
  

	
Re:

	
Equity Compensation -- Mississippian Acquisition












Dear Sean:







This letter memorializes the further agreement by and between South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC (“STXRA”) and Pacific Energy Development MSL LLC (“PEDCO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PEDEVCO Corp. (“PEDEVCO”), regarding equity compensation due and payable to STXRA in connection with PEDCO’s acquisition of certain interests in the Mississippian formation in southern Kansas (the “Subject Acreage”) from Berexco LLC (“Berexco”), pursuant to that certain Agreement for Purchase of Term Assignment dated February 22, 2013, by and between Berexco and PEDCO (the “AFPOTA”).







PEDCO and STXRA previously entered into a letter agreement, dated March 25, 2013, pursuant to which PEDCO agreed to pay to STXRA a fee equal to $75.00 per net oil and gas acre in the Subject Acreage acquired by PEDCO (6,762.94 net acres) (the “Gross Commission”), payable 80% in cash and 20% in common stock of PEDEVCO (the “Equity Commission”), with the number of shares of common stock to be issued to be calculated as follows:  (Gross Commission * 20%) / the higher of (x) the price per share of PEDEVCO common stock issued in the IPO, or (y) $1.25.







However, STXRA and PEDCO hereby agree that the number of shares of common stock to be issued shall instead be calculated as follows:  (Gross Commission * 20%) / the higher of (x) the closing price per share of PEDEVCO common stock on June 14, 2013, or (y) $3.75.







Regards,







/s/ Michael L. Peterson                                                            


Michael L. Peterson


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Pacific Energy Development MSL LLC












Agreed to and Accepted:







South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC







By:  /s/ Michael Rozenfeld                                                      







Name:  Michael Rozenfeld                                                                







Title:  Manager/VP Geosciences                                                      







Date:  May 15, 2013
# C_2009019EN.01002803.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 November 2008 — New Look v OHIM (NEW LOOK)

(Case T-435/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark NEW LOOK - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 19/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: New Look Ltd (Weymouth, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and M. Blair and K. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2007 (Case R 670/2007-2) relating to the registration of the word sign NEW LOOK as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders New Look Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders New Look Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Brundon MOORE

No. 163P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Brundon Moore, for Moore, Brundon.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st of May 2018 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Carteret County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-K**
I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Cellular Corporation (the“registrant”);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (c)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (d)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vernal Aldegon, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 864]

Appeal by the *476defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered January 6, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of a fair trial by a joint trial with two codefendants *(see,*CPL 200.40 [1]). The decision to grant or deny a severance lies within the sound discretion of the Trial Judge *(see, People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174, 183). Where, as here, the proof against all of the defendants is supplied by the same evidence, “only the most cogent reasons warrant a severance” *(People v Bornholdt,*33 NY2d 75, 87, *cert denied sub nom. Victory v New York,*416 US 905). The defendant failed to proffer any cogent reasons for a severance. Therefore, a joint trial was proper. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

## Meeting of the Trustees and Officers of the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation 

### October 25, 2005, 3 p.m.-5 p.m., U.S. Capitol, Room HC-8 

I. Welcome and Opening Comments 

II. Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of September 24, 2004 

III. Report from the President 

IV. Report from the Executive Secretary 

V. Report on 2005 Summer Institute, 2005/2006 Truman Fellows Program 

VI. Approval of Budget for FY 2006 

VII. Appointment of an Executive Secretary 

VIII. Old Business 

IX. New Business 

X. Adjournment 

Louis H. Blair, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-19892 Filed 9-29-05; 3:14 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6820-AD-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          87,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,918
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               83
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           268
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,918
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (54,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,799)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4518 

To protect the constitutional rights of parents and children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To protect the constitutional rights of parents and children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parental Protection 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds: 

8 (1) The rates in the diagnosis of psychiatric 

9 disorders in children and the prescription of psycho10 tropic medication to children has increased dramati11 cally in recent years. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4518 IH

1 (2) Nearly 70 percent of the Diagnostic and 

2 Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–V) 

3 task force members report having ties to the phar4 maceutical industry. 

5 (3) Many medical institutions are allowed to in6 clude wards of the State in research that presents 

7 greater than minimal risk with no prospect of direct 

8 benefit for the research subject. 

9 (4) There is a misuse of federally allocated 

10 funds to violate the First and Fourteenth Amend11 ment rights of children and wards of the State. 

12 SEC. 3. GENERAL AUTHORIZATION. 

13 The Department of Health and Human Services shall 

14 withhold all monies from State agencies or entities, hos15 pitals, and medical facilities that— 

16 (1) allow research presenting greater than mini17 mal risk to minors, juveniles, or wards of the State; 

18 (2) deny Fourteenth Amendment rights to the 

19 parents or child; or 

20 (3) investigate parents or charge them with 

21 medical neglect, or remove children from the par22 ents’ custody when in disagreement with a subjective 

23 diagnosis involving psychotropic drugs. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4518 IH

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT. 

2 The Department of Health and Human Services and 

3 the Attorney General shall enforce the provisions of sec4 tion 4. 

5 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The provisions of this Act shall take effect imme7 diately upon enactment. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Omar Jalam COOK

No. 251A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Cook, Omar Jalam.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Lars F. Nance, Special Deputy Attorney General, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the provisional petition filed by Defendant on the 16th of January 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to Not Require the Payment of Additional Pro Hac Vice Fees:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**I, Christopher D. Bills, certify that:     1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC;     2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions);          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007           */s/ Christopher D. Bills*         Christopher D. Bills    Chief Financial Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00012

- CV

P ATRICK M AHAFFEY

, Appellant

V

.

S ETH W ASHBURNE AND T HIRSTY 13 TH

, LLC, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 48th District

Court

of Tarrant County (048

- 268735

- 13)

Novemb er 15, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is f urther ordered that A ppell ant Patrick Mahaffey shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
BLOCK MORTGAGE FINANCE, INC.
                    ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1998-2

                  MASTER SERVICER ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                March 30, 1999


     Pursuant to the  provisions  of Section  8.16 of the Pooling and  Servicing
Agreement dated as of July 1, 1998, by and between BLOCK MORTGAGE FINANCE, INC.,
as  Depositor,  COMPANION  MORTGAGE  CORPORATION,  as  Seller,  BLOCK  FINANCIAL
CORPORATION,  as Master Servicer,  and THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, N.A.,
as  Trustee  (the  "PSA"),  I, Bret G.  Wilson,  Vice  President  of the  Master
Servicer, hereby certify as follows:

     (i)   a review  of  the  activities  of  the  Master  Servicer  during  the
preceding calendar year and of  performance under the PSA has been made under my
supervision;

     (ii)  to the best of my  individual  knowledge  based on such  review,  the
Master  Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under the PSA for such
year; and

     (iii) the Master Servicer's  short-term  commercial paper is rated is A1 by
Standard & Poor's and P-1 by Moody's.

Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
set forth in the PSA.


                               BLOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                               By:  /s/ Bret G. Wilson
                                  ------------------------------------
                                    Bret G. Wilson, Vice President
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

p0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138174

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138174 COA: 285595 Genesee CC: 94-049997-FC CORTEZ TRAWETS SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 9, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>

                                 [LETTERHEAD]

                                 APRIL 6, 2000


BENZ ENERGY INC.
1000 LOUISIANA, SUITE 1500
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

ATTENTION: MR. BOB HERLIN
           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                    CONSENT

                 INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS

        AS INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS, WE HEREBY CONSENT, TO THE
REFERENCE IN THIS FORM 10-K OF BENZ ENERGY INC. TO OUR FIRM'S NAME AND OUR
FIRM'S REVIEW OF THE PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVE QUANTITIES AS OF JANUARY 1,
2000.

                                       VERY TRULY YOURS,

                                       R. A. LENSER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                       /S/ RONALD A. LENSER

                                       RONALD A. LENSER
                                       REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
                                       PE NO. 30558

RAL/gac
HOUSTON, TEXAS
APRIL 6, 2000