alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 448 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 448

To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes of subchapter 
IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to 
     as the Davis-Bacon Act), be determined by the Bureau of Labor 
                              Statistics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2013

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes of subchapter 
IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to 
     as the Davis-Bacon Act), be determined by the Bureau of Labor 
                              Statistics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsibility in Federal 
Contracting Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS DETERMINATION OF PREVAILING WAGE.

    Section 3142(b) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(acting through the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics of the Department of Labor)'' after ``Secretary of 
        Labor''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, using surveys carried out by the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics that use proper random statistical sampling 
        techniques''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

                              Subsidiaries of State of Franklin Bancshares, Inc.



     State of Franklin  Savings Bank, a  Tennessee-chartered  savings bank, is a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of State of Franklin  Bancshares,  Inc., as is State of
Franklin  Leasing  Corporation,  a  Tennessee  corporation.  John  Sevier  Title
Services,  Inc., a Tennessee corporation,  is a wholly owned subsidiary of State
of Franklin  Savings  Bank.  State of Franklin  Real  Estate,  Inc., a Tennessee
corporation,  is a wholly owned  subsidiary  of State of Franklin  Savings Bank.
State of Franklin Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut business trust, is a business
trust subsidiary of State of Franklin Bancshares, Inc.
Susan SYKES d/b/a Advanced Chiropractic and Health Center; Dawn Patrick ; Troy Lynn; Lifeworks on Lake Norman, PLLC; Brent Bost; and Bost Chiropractic Clinic, P.A. v. HEALTH NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. f/k/a Chiropractic Network of the Carolinas, Inc. ; Michael Binder; Steven Binder ; Robert Stroud, Jr.; Larry Grosman; Matthew Schmid; Ralph Ransone; Jeffrey K. Baldwin ; Ira Rubin ; Richard Armstrong; Brad Batchelor; John Smith; Rick Jackson; and Mark Hooper

No. 251PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

*105Robert E. Fields, III, Attorney at Law, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorney at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, Leon E. Porter, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Sykes, Susan, et al.

Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem.

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Benjamin R. Norman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, W. Michael Dowling, Attorney at Law, for Health Network Solutions, Inc., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 8th of August 2018 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
#### Lloyd MCELRATH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D02-3823.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 29, 2003.

Lloyd McElrath, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2018

Ms. Gretchen Engel, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez

Mr. James E. Ferguson, II, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Raleigh, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers

Ms. Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Irving Joyner, Durham, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Ms. Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Mr. Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Mr. W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Mr. Burton Craige, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Jeremy M. Falcone, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State *370The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Professors John Charles Boger and Robert P. Mosteller for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                            EXHIBIT 21

                                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                                                     Percentage             State
                                                                                         of           Of Incorporation
          Parent                                   Subsidiary                         Ownership        or Organization
          ------                                   ----------                         ---------        ---------------
<S>                                         <C>                                           <C>          <C>
PennFed Financial Services, Inc.            Penn Federal Savings Bank                     100%         United States

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.            PennFed Capital Trust I                       100%         Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank                   Penn Savings Insurance Agency                 100%         New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank                   Ferry Development Holding Co.                 100%         Delaware

</TABLE>

The financial  statements of the Registrant are  consolidated  with those of its
subsidiaries.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Augustus SHORE, Jr.

No. 339P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Daniel M. Blau, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Robert Hale, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Shore, Charles Augustus (Jr.).

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the Petition for Discretionary Review filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of October, 2017, the Court allows the Defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits of the Defendant's argument concerning the issue of mistrial. Except as specifically allowed, the petition is denied.:

"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.47

                SECOND AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL SUBLEASE AGREEMENT

      This Second Amendment to Commercial Sublease Agreement ("Amendment")
dated September 10, 2002, is made by and between Southwest Michigan
Innovation Center, Inc. (formerly known as SWMF Holdings Corporation)
("Landlord") and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. ("Tenant").

                              PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

      A. Landlord and Tenant entered into a Commercial Sublease dated June 22,
2001 (the "Sublease") covering the following numbered rooms in McCracken Hall at
Western Michigan University: 5010, 5030, 5040, 5041, 5042, 5070, 5090, 5110,
5111, and 5280C.

      B. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Sublease, the term of the Sublease
is for one (1) year commencing October 15, 2001 and expiring October 14, 2002.

      C. Pursuant to paragraph 3, Tenant has the option to renew the Sublease
for four (4) additional six (6) month terms, the first of which shall commence
immediately after the end of the original term of the Sublease.

      D. Tenant has given Landlord notice of intent to renew the Sublease for
the first six-month renewal term and the parties are entering into this
Amendment to memorialize such renewal.

                                    AGREEMENT

      1. The Sublease is hereby amended to extend the term of the Sublease for
one (1) additional six (6) month period and the term of the Sublease will
commence on October 15, 2002 and expire on April 14, 2003, unless further
extended in accordance with the terms of paragraph 3 of the Sublease.

      2. In accordance with the Sublease, rent during the additional term shall
be the same as the rent specified in Section 4 of the Sublease, as amended.

      3. Except as expressly stated otherwise in this Amendment, all rights and
obligations of Tenant and Landlord contained in the Sublease remain in full
force and effect.

      4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile, each
of which shall constitute an original and all of which shall together constitute
one and the same Amendment.
<PAGE>
      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of
the day and year first above written.

                        SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN INNOVATION CENTER, INC.


                        By: /s/ Barry Broome
                            ----------------
                            Barry Broome
                                 Its:   Executive Director/CEO


                              ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.

                        By: /s/ Roger Newton
                            ----------------
                            Roger Newton
                                 Its:   CEO
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas McLean REEVES, Defendant.

No. COA17-305

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
IN RE: E.D.

125PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 26, 2018

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for E.D.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 24th of September 2018 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of September 2018."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 9th day of November 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 1, 2012 

d0125 

Order 

 

February 1, 2012 

143681 

JACLYN S. ALLEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143681 

 COA: 297392 

Washtenaw CC: 09-000054-NI 

AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL 

SERVICES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

CRYSTAL GALE BLACK and JAMES 

ROBERT BLACK, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

l!onorabYe PonaYd M. XnrkIe, Chairman 

Comzzittee on Conetitlttional' Amendments 

~:OUWJ of Rcprcuentatioos 

4Rth Lt?gi!slature 

An&in, Texafi 

Opinion #a. 0-6627 

Ccneral Opinion_Nos. 

Mny 30, 1046, red dircunstances surrounding 

y the Loglslaturo and 

of State’s OPCice to 

counties of the statej 

order to fully 0xpYore 

is prOQOUea amendment it 

ry for you t.n tnke into nacount any releyour direot i~nvesti.gatlon of the exiutceu may reveal,. Thi.a in my understanding 

s In thiu. ease: 

*I am inlormed by the office of the Secretary of 

Stat.0 that He J. n. 13 was mailed to 238 newspapars on 

Tuefiday evcninp, Yav 22, P04!5; the sam asy it wan rec~ef~cd in thnt off-lco. Xo noxsnnpx- ia publi~heti In 

the rclrai.nlng 16 counties. The acLnovlcd,~ant cards, 

ncce~tin.~ t,l?o COnY for rnh7icntion on the dotos specj~- 

ficti, was roturned hwdiatoly hy 2’24 publishers. Of 

the 14 who wrote to say the ?npy missed their dondline, 
3,014 Fr1aay 

480 Est. 

S,QEK) lkxlnesday 

1,3&3 FrCioy 

2,607 Thursday 

1) nm Friday 

MXJ 33st .Thtwuaay 

r,n3r, Thursday 

12,032 

3,329 

I,m33 

12,451 

41 ,o23 

rr,rrr?4 

12,372 

10,0&l 

R*3Sr, 
legn33y sub?dttcd for a vote on August 

25, 10451 

"(2) Irrospeotive of your anmer to question 

P;umher 1, will the aiiandmont ?3ecosra a part 

of the onnstitution should It eppar on 

tho hsllot and moeive a nzajorlty of the 

VoteR cast?" 

You are advIsed that uixler the facts etated House 

Joint Rep#lut.lon Ho. X3 is Mint: Xegally nOmItt& with this 

~ImlIfication, in go@@ of the OOuntias ‘We save has not hoen 

hly puhl1~hed fop uant nP sdfieient time. Tb3s IrroguJzrity ~111 not necessarily prevent I:!:e sdoption OF the amencJmcnt 

hy the people unless the total potcntid leg-al vote In those 

cmmtlos where no publicntlon was had nnd no eJeot.ion @clcJ 

WOtsld he suff3clont if counter1 ap$inst the a&?tion of the menclmnti to result in the amendment's receiving less tfinn a =alority of fiueJl total count. In such event the amendment would 

ret1 for lack of+ the neoessnry majority vote. SOS the Pol.1 oasnf? cascm 

IhmnlCut to State, 12 6. i?. 106; 

I:etxwt v. Scurloc!~, 17," i;. V. 711; 

Uanos v. State, 203 S. E. 310. 

We trust thc~t what we hffvo &id suffiolontJy answers 

blth of your questioas.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4430 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4430

 To amend the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act to ensure that certain 
   facilities continue to be treated as alcohol-related facilities, 
  notwithstanding the distribution of spent grains resulting from the 
                   production of alcoholic beverages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2014

   Mr. Womack (for himself, Mr. Welch, Ms. Pingree of Maine, and Mr. 
   Gardner) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act to ensure that certain 
   facilities continue to be treated as alcohol-related facilities, 
  notwithstanding the distribution of spent grains resulting from the 
                   production of alcoholic beverages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting the Sustainable Use of 
Spent Grains Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF EXEMPTION TO ALCOHOL-RELATED FACILITIES THAT 
              DISTRIBUTE SPENT GRAINS.

    Section 116 of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (21 U.S.C. 
2206) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Spent Grains.--Notwithstanding subsection (b), the exemption 
in subsection (a) shall not cease to apply to a facility on the basis 
of such facility distributing, for use as food for animals, spent 
grains resulting from the facility's production of alcoholic 
beverages.''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), as redesignated, by striking 
        ``Except as provided in subsections (a) and (b)'' and inserting 
        ``Except as provided in subsections (a), (b), and (c)''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. PERRY and Powell

265P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 22, 2018

Ms. Emily H. Davis, Durham, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Perry, Shenondoah

Mr. James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, for Powell, Earl Lamont *396Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General

Ms. Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, for Powell, Earl Lamont

Mr. Jeremy D. Lindsley, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for State of North Carolina

Ms. Valerie Mitchell Asbell, Ahoskie, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of August 2018."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 463 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform the provisions 

relating to status under section 101(a)(15)(U) of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mrs. BLACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform 

the provisions relating to status under section 

101(a)(15)(U) of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY. 

4 Section 101(a)(15)(U) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(U)) is amended— 

6 (1) by amending clause (ii) to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(ii) the spouse and children of an alien de8 scribed in clause (i), if accompanying or following to 

9 join the alien; and’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 463 IH

1 (2) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘or attempt, con2 spiracy, or solicitation to commit any of the above 

3 mentioned crimes;’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DURATION OF STATUS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(p)(6) of such Act (8 

6 U.S.C. 1184(p)(6)) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(6) DURATION OF STATUS.—The authorized 

8 period of status of an alien as a nonimmigrant 

9 under section 101(a)(15)(U) shall be not more than 

10 the shorter of 3 years or the period of limitations 

11 prescribed in the applicable law governing the crimi12 nal activity described in section 101(a)(15)(U)(iii). 

13 Such authorized period of status shall be extended 

14 upon certification from a Federal, State, or local law 

15 enforcement official, prosecutor, judge, or other Fed16 eral, State, or local authority investigating or pros17 ecuting criminal activity described in section 

18 101(a)(15)(U)(iii) that the alien’s presence in the 

19 United States is required to assist in the investiga20 tion or prosecution of such criminal activity. The 

21 Secretary of Homeland Security may extend, beyond 

22 the period authorized under this section, the author23 ized period of status of an alien as a nonimmigrant 

24 under section 101(a)(15)(U) if the Secretary deter25 mines that an extension of such period is warranted 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 463 IH

1 due to exceptional circumstances. The Secretary may 

2 grant work authorization to any alien who has a 

3 pending, bona fide application for nonimmigrant sta4 tus under section 101(a)(15)(U).’’. 

5 (b) LIMITATION ON ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—Sec6 tion 245 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) is amended by strik7 ing subsection (m). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Gilbert BOYLES, Defendant.

No. COA17-348

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.02


                               RED ROOF INNS, INC.

                           ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Red Roof Inns,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and
appoints David N. Chichester and/or Alan L. Tallis, collectively and
individually, as his agent and attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and re-substitution, to (a) sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on
his behalf and in his name, place, and stead in any and all capacities with
respect to the registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d), (b) sign and file any and all amendments, including
post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K, (c) sign and file any and
all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission covered by the Form 10-K, and (d) do and perform any and all other
acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required in the premises; and
(2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant hereto
by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 16th day of March, 1998.



                                /s/ JOHN A. HENRY
                                --------------------------------
                                John A. Henry
  


                                       55
STATE of North Carolina v. Laurie Marie SOUTHERLAND

No. COA17-1349

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.