alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57649-57650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0119]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57650]]

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has submitted the 
collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and 
burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 2, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Records Management 
Service (005E3), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 565-8374, FAX (202) 565-6950 or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e88c8d86819b8dc6858b8489858aa885898184c69e89c68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4327262d2a30266d2e202f222e21032e222a2f6d35226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 
2900-0119.''
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 
2900-0119'' in any correspondence.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Report of Treatment in Hospital, VA 
FL 29-551.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0119.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: VA Form Letter 29-551 is used collect information from 
hospitals were a claimant's was treated. VA uses the data to determine 
the insured's eligibility for disability insurance benefits.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on February 15, 2005 at page 7796.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 4,055 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 12 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On Occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 20,277.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Records Management Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19653 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Pena, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 877]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), rendered November 24, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *640withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, Acting P. J., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, *JJ.,*concur.
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County

Case No. CAE-13-20328 Argued: October 3, 2014 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 28 September Term, 2013

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v. MICHAEL FRANCIS BARNETT

Barbera, C.J. Harrell Battaglia Greene Adkins McDonald Watts, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: October 3, 2014ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland * Misc. Docket AG No. 28 MICHAEL FRANCIS BARNETT * September Term, 2013
PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day October 2014, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Michael Francis Barnett, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Michael Francis Barnett from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Michael Francis Barnett.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
NUMBER 13-08-00712-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

NORMAN DUSTIN REEDY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 103rd District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Norman Dustin Reedy, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated

assault. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On December 17, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On December 30, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect

or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 15th day of January, 2009.
Exhibit 12.1

                               General Media, Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earning to Fixed Charges
                             Year Ended December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1993          1994           1995          1996          1997
                                           ----          ----           ----          ----          ----
<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Income (loss) from continuing
   operations, before income taxes     $14,387,000   $ 3,769,000   $(10,012,000)  $  (701,000)  $(1,915,000)
                                       -----------   -----------   ------------   -----------   -----------

Adjustments to income (loss)
   Interest expense                      3,027,000    10,474,000     10,302,000     9,907,000     9,918,000
   Interest income                         (80,000)     (564,000)      (541,000)     (319,000)     (611,000)
   Interest expense in rental charges      608,000        87,000        689,000       789,000       754,000
                                       -----------   -----------   ------------   -----------   -----------
Adjusted income (loss)                 $17,942,000   $13,766,000       $438,000   $ 9,676,000   $ 8,146,000
                                       ===========   ===========   ============   ===========   ===========
Fixed charges
   Interest expense                    $ 3,027,000   $10,474,000   $ 10,302,000   $ 9,907,000   $ 9,918,000
   Interest expense in rental charges      608,000        87,000        689,000       789,000       754,000
                                       -----------   -----------   ------------   -----------   -----------
Total fixed charges                    $ 3,635,000   $10,561,000   $ 10,991,000   $10,696,000   $10,672,000
                                       ===========   ===========   ============   ===========   ===========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges             4.9           1.3            0.0           0.9           0.8
                                       ===========   ===========   ============   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 191/12 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4912 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 191

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4912 July 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2006 of 11 July 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus and Russia | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2006 of 11 July 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus and Russia

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. Albert Uriah MATHIS

No. 135P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Paul F. Herzog, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Albert Uriah Mathis, for Mathis, Albert Uriah.

Terence D. Friedman, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 8th of May 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security.
    Title: Miscellaneous Activities.
    Form Number(s): Not applicable.
    Agency Approval Number: 0694-0102.
    Type of Request: Renewal of an existing collection.
    Burden: 201 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 2.
    Average Hours Per Response: 100.5.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection activities is comprised 
of two activities: ``Registration Of U.S. Agricultural Commodities For 
Exemption From Short Supply Limitations On Export'', and ``Petitions 
For The Imposition Of Monitoring Or Controls On Recyclable Metallic 
materials; Public Hearings.'' These activities are statutory in nature 
and, though they are seldom applied, must remain a part of BIS's 
information collection budget authorization.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit and 
not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6613, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. (or via Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b7f5342555e507b5f5458155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a2e0213040f012a0e0509440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, e-mail address, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e0a2f38272a111c213d3a252b3c0e21232c602b213e60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="753114031c112a271a06011e1007351a18175b101a055b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>, or fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: September 22, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19301 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Geneva T. BULLARD, Administratrix of the Estate of Vonnie Lee Bullard v. PRIME BUILDING COMPANY, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 368P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, Attorneys at Law, Winston-Salem, for Bullard, Geneva T. (Administratrix of the Estate)

David M. Fothergill, Rodney E. Pettey, Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, for Prime Building Company, Inc. of NC

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 2nd of November 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of November 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order *247was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                   
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Scott J. Krenz                             
|                         |  |  |  | Scott J. Krenz                                    
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RA FA EL G A RCI A - RO J A S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72070 A ge nc yN o. A 029- 192- 572 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R a f a e l G ar c i a - R oj a s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) deci si on denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED MA R 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72070 2 d e p o rt a t i o n p r o c e e d i n g s h e l di n ab s e n t i a . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o du e p ro cess cl ai m s, M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 424 F . 3d 926, 930 ( 9th C i r . 2005) , and f oran abus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f m o tio n s to r e o p e n , H

e rn a n dez - Vi v a s v . I

NS , 23 F . 3d 15 57 , 15 60 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 4 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g G ar c ia - R o ja s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n f orf a i l ur e t o e s t abl i s h r e a s onabl e c aus e f orhi s abs e nc e f

r om the June 7, 1 9 9 0 d e p o rta tio n h e ar in g . Se e H e rnandez - V

i v as , 23 F . 3d at15 59 (m i st aken bel i ef th a t atim e lym o tio n to c h an g e v e n u e n e g a te dc o u rt ap p e ar an c e d o e s n o t c o n s titu te re as on abl e c ause excusi ng fa i l ure t o app ear) . G ar ci a- R oj as ’ ar gu m entthatthe B IA and I Jr e j e c t e d hi s m ot i on unde ran i nc orr e c tl e ga l s t andar d i s nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. G ar ci a- R oj as ’ cont ent i on thatthe B IA erre d b y det erm i ni ng thathe w as in e lig ib le f

o rr e lie f u n d e rN A C A R A is w ith o u t m e r it. See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 43 (e ) (e st abl i shi ng fi l i ng deadl i nes f or m ot i on s t o reopen seeki ng re l i ef un der N A C A R A ). G ar c i a - R oj a s ’ c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A ’ s de ni a l of hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n09- 72070 3 v io la te s h is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts is a ls o w ith o u t m e r it. Se e M ar t i nez - R os as , 424 F . 3d a t930. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on October 25, 2005, at the Inn by the Lake, 3300 Lake Tahoe 
Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Committee, established by the 
Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 25, 2005, beginning at 3:15 
p.m. and ending at 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Inn by the Lake, 3300 Lake 
Tahoe Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria Trahey, Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 
96150, (530) 543-2643.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The committee will meet jointly with the 
Lake Tahoe Basin Executives Committee. Items to be covered on the 
agenda include: (1) The Environmental Improvement Program at Lake 
Tahoe; (2) the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act--Round 7; 
and, (3) Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are 
encouraged to attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the 
attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the 
meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the 
Committee before or after the meeting. Please refer any written 
comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address 
stated above.

    Dated: September 30, 2005.
Tyrone Kelley,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-20053 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Valerie ARROYO v. Daniel J ZAMORA, Zamora Law Firm, PLLC

No. 301P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Chad T. Diamond, Attorney at Law, For Zamora, Daniel J.

Ms. Valerie Arroyo, For Arroyo, Valerie.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 5th of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of September 2017 by Plaintiff for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."