alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InterMountain Community Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Curt Hecker, Chief Executive Officer, and Doug Wright, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  November 10, 2004

/s/ Curt Hecker                              /s/ Doug Wright
_______________________________              ___________________________________
Curt Hecker                                  Doug Wright
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30158

Summary Calendar

 

RODNEY C. CURRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN MUNGONA, St. Tammany Parish Jail, ET AL.,

Defendants,

WARDEN MUNGOVAN, incorrectly named as Warden

Mungona in pleading; SAMUEL RAINEY, Lieutenant;

MIKE BURNS, Deputy,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-3120-I

 

August 28, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodney C. Curry, Louisiana inmate #180222, appeals the

judgment for the defendants in his suit under 28 U.S.C. § 1983.

According to Curry, the defendants were deliberately indifferent to

his medical needs after he broke his nose in a fight with an inmate

while awaiting trial.
2

After a hearing, a magistrate judge recommended dismissing the

complaint, and the district court adopted this recommendation. We

cannot find clear error in the lower courts’ holding that the

defendant prison officials did not show subjective deliberate

indifference to Curry’s medical needs. See Hare v. City of

Corinth, 74 F.3d 633 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 04, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 04, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A1852. EMMALANE FARMS, INC. d/b/a NEWTON RISK MANAGEMENT 

AGENCY v. C. ASHTON BLOUNT, III INSURANCE AGENCY LLC et al.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Joris HAARHUIS, Administrator of the Estate of Julie Haarhuis (Deceased) v. Emily CHEEK

No. 332P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Stephanie W. Anderson, Walter K. Burton, Greensboro, Cam Bordman, Attorneys at Law, for Cheek, Emily

J. David Stradley, Raleigh, Leto Copeley, Durham, Attorneys at Law, for Haarhuis, Joris (Administrator), et al.

Robert P. Holmes, IV, Attorney at Law, Raleigh

Meghan Wray Deutsch-Blanco, Attorney at Law *104***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th of October 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th of October 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
#### In re Bryan M. WHITE.

No. 2003-B-1425.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 2003.

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response thereto filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that Bryan Michael White, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18501, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursu*977ant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen J. McDonnell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Holly Logistic Services,L.L.C., the general partner of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., the general partner of Holly EnergyPartners, L.P., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Holly Energy Partners, L.P;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 4, 2005   /s/ Stephen J. McDonnell         Stephen J. McDonnell    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Motion Granted and En Banc Order filed December 18, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-17-00558-CV

MIKE HALL CHEVROLET, INC. D/B/A AUTONATION CHEVROLET

HIGHWAY 6 F/K/A CHAMPION CHEVROLET HIGHWAY 6, 

AUTONATION, INC., AUTONATION ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, 

AN DEALERSHIP HOLDING COMPANY, AND AUTO HOLDING LLC 

F/K/A AUTO HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellants

V.

ALEXANDRA DEIKE, F/K/A ALEJANDRA VALDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY

AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROSA ELVIA GUERRERO,

DECEASED, ARIANA DOMINGUEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF

OF THE ESTATE OF RUBEN DOMINGUEZ, DECEASED, GREGORIO 

ARMANDO DOMINGUEZ, EILEEN MEJIA, ANDREA ZERTUCHE, JOSE 

GUERRERO, EDUWIGES GUERRERO, DONALD CLARK, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF LINDA ANN HARTON CLARK, DECEASED, JENNIFER CLARK

AND JOANNA CLARK, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 388,367-401

E N B A N C O R D E R
2

Appellants Mike Hall Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a AutoNation Chevrolet Highway 6 

f/k/a Champion Chevrolet Highway 6, AutoNation, Inc., AutoNation Enterprises, 

Incorporated, AN Dealership Holding Company, and Auto Holding LLC f/k/a Auto 

Holding Corporation (“Appellants”) and appellees Alexandra Deike, f/k/a Alejandra 

Valdez, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Rosa Elvia Guerrero, Deceased, 

Ariana Dominguez, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Ruben Dominguez, 

Deceased, Gregorio Armando Dominguez, Eileen Mejia, Andrea Zertuche, Jose 

Guerrero, and Eduwiges Guerrero (“Appellees”) have filed a “Joint Announcement of 

Settlement and Motion to Withhold Ruling on Pending Motions and Motion to Lift 

Stay to Allow Court Approval.” We GRANT the joint motion. 

To allow time for the parties to execute settlement agreements and deliver 

settlement funds, for the next sixty days, this court will not rule on either (1) 

“Appellees’ Joint Withdrawal of Opposition to Appellants’ Motion to Compel 

Arbitration, Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal, and Appellees’ Motion to 

Dissolve the Stay of Trial” or (2) the merits of this appeal. To allow Probate Court 

No. 2, Harris County, Texas, to approve the settlements, we LIFT THE STAY OF 

TRIAL in cause number 388,367-401 in Probate Court No. 2, Harris County, Texas,

ordered by this court on October 12, 2018. 

We ABATE this appeal for a period of sixty days from the date of this order. 

We shall treat this appeal as a closed case and remove it from this court’s active 

docket. The appeal shall be reinstated on this court’s active docket when Appellants 

and Appellees file a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, or this court may reinstate the 

appeal on its own motion. 

PER CURIAM

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce, Christopher, 

Jamison, Busby, Donovan, Brown, Wise, and Jewell.
#### In re MCDERMOTT INCORPORATED. McDermott Incorporated v. Records Storage, et al. Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, LLP v. Records Storage, et al. Lowe, Stein, etc. v. Records Storage, et al.

No. 2003-CC-1389.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re McDermott Incorporated; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, Nos. 2002-5763, 2002-8749, 2002-8491, 2002-8573; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-0467.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. Judgment of the trial court is reinstated. *See Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.,*93-1480 (La.4/11/94), 634 So.2d 1180. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

KNOLL, J., would deny.
| Name                        | State of Organization or Incorporation | D/B/A |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------|
| New River Exploration, Inc. | Colorado                               | N/A   |
| Sun River Energy I, LLC     | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River ETX GENPAR I LLC  | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River ETX I, LP         | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River NM GENPAR I, LLC  | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River NM I, LP          | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River Operating, Inc.   | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River WTX GENPAR I, LLC | Texas                                  | N/A   |
| Sun River WTX I, LP         | Texas                                  | N/A   |
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

R. Wayne Johnson , Appellant

No. 06

- 24

- 00007

- CV v.
U.S. Post Office, et al. , Appellee Appeal from the 62nd District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 92147 ). Panel consist s of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we d ismiss the appeal. We note that the appellant, R. Wayne Johnson , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 25, 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2017

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2017

154396(85)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 154396

v COA: 325782 

Wayne CC: 14-006454-FH

GARY PATRICK LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief to March 1, 2017, is GRANTED. The time for filing the 

supplemental brief of plaintiff-appellant is also extended to March 1, 2017.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-32854 and 333-41394)pertaining to the eGain Communications Corporation Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan, the Social Science, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Big Science Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the eGain Communications Corporation 1999 Employee StockPurchase Plan, the Amended and Restated Inference Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 Non-Management Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 New Hire Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Charles W.Jepson Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Private Placement Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and (Form S-3 No. 333-48314) pertaining to22,373,370 Shares of Common Stock and the related Prospectus of our report dated August 8, 2003, except for Note 14 as to which the date is September 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eGainCommunications Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

September 29, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                GREENPOINT MANUFACTURED HOUSING CONTRACT TRUST
                           PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                 SERIES 1999-2
                   January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999


                                              Class A-1         Class A-2
                                            -------------     --------------
1999 Distribution Allocable to Principal    15,214,254.83               0.00
1999 Distributions Allocable to Interest     3,930,801.88       4,555,083.32
12/31/99 Remaining Principal Balance        74,423,177.17     100,000,000.00


Number and aggregate remaining principal balance of Contracts with payments
delinquent:


   Days Delinquent       Number      Aggregate Remaining Principal Balance
   ---------------       ------      -------------------------------------
      31 - 59              113                 4,870,240.21
      60 - 89               21                   986,247.18
     90 or more             46                 1,945,677.80


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                        <C>
Aggregate amount of servicing fees and expenses payable out of the trust for 1999:           1,528,937.29

The number of contracts that were repurchased or replaced during 1999                                   4

1999 Aggregate Principal Balance of All Contracts repossessed or foreclosed upon             5,848,514.21

The balance in the Reserve Account as of 12/31/99                                                    0.00

1999 Cumulative Realized Losses                                                              1,374,346.74

The amount of any outstanding Monthly Advance Amount as of 12/31/99                            234,986.93

1999 amounts deposited to Reserve Account                                                            0.00

The pool scheduled principal balance, expressed as a percentage                                91.9771879%
     of the Cut-Off Date pool principal balance

The number of Manufactured Homes Currently held by the Servicer due to Repossessions                   81
    and the aggregate principal balance of the related defaulted Contracts                   3,153,208.53
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF STATE OF FRANKLIN BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,928,172
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,248,572
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     86,104,974
<ALLOWANCE>                                    630,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             118,035,681
<DEPOSITS>                                  96,364,077
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,101,305
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,180,152
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,390,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             118,035,681
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,756,736
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,820,032
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,756,768
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,457,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,761,135
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,540,506
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  275,127
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              38,769
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,402,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                548,695
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     548,695
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   496,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.79
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               355,474
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      277
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              630,324
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           630,324
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Willard BRIGGS, Employee v. DEBBIE'S STAFFING, INC., Employer, N.C. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Carrier; Employment Plus, Employer, N.C. Ins. Guar. Ass'n; and Permatech, Inc., Employer, Cincinnati Ins. Co., Carrier

No. 108P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Edward L. Pauley, Attorney at Law, for Briggs, Willard.

Lisa W. Bullard, Attorney at Law, for State.

John A. Tomei, John Tomei, Attorneys at Law, for Employment Plus, et al.

Gregory Newton, Tara D. Muller, Dayle A. Flammia, Attorneys at Law, for Permatech, Inc., et al.

Buxton S. Copeland, Tracy C. Myatt, Attorneys at Law, for Debbie's Staffing, Inc., et al.

*275***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 23rd of April 2018 by Defendants (Permatech, Inc. and Cincinnati Ins. Co.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. George Reynold EVANS

No. COA17-840

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

NO ERROR.