alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,593,206
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,541,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    230,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,323,201
<PP&E>                                      64,354,260
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,671,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,261,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,828,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,701
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,884,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,261,979
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,523,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               62,872,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,244,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,406,359
<INCOME-TAX>                                   578,742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            827,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   827,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


      I, Roger S. Newton, Chief Executive Officer, of Esperion Therapeutics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *


  /s/ Roger S. Newton
------------------------
Roger S. Newton,
Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 26, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**ANSWERS      CORPORATION**

**FORM 10-Q      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |                              |
| Date: May              14,              2007 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | /s/ STEVEN              STEINBERG |
|                                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                              | Name: Steven                SteinbergTitle:                   Chief Financial Officer                            (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
ex10-3.htm


 


Exhibit 10.3


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


APPRAISAL REPORT


 


ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES


 


owned by


 


TRANSCOASTAL CORPORATION


 


As of 


 


December 31, 2012
Leslie Laurene BELLAMY, Plaintiff v. Starsky Shane BRANSON, Defendant

No. COA17-666

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: March 9, 2006

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
#### STATE ex rel. Donald WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Williams, Donald;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 305-606; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-1065.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Presidential Documents 58287 

Proclamation 7939 of September 30, 2005 

Child Health Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Children are a precious gift, and we have a responsibility to help them 

realize a hopeful and promising future. On Child Health Day, we underscore 

the importance of healthy and active lifestyles for our Nation’s young people, 

and we reaffirm our commitment to helping them use their gifts to work 

toward a successful future. 

We have high aspirations for all our Nation’s children. Parents play the 

central role in ensuring the health and well-being of their children and 

in creating a safe and nurturing environment. Schools, communities, and 

government leaders can support the work of parents by helping to build 

a society based on the fundamental values of respect, honesty, self-restraint, 

fairness, and compassion. We must all continue to promote a culture of 

responsibility in which families and communities teach young people to 

understand that their decisions affect their health now and in the future. 

My Administration remains committed to giving parents, teachers, mentors, 

and communities the resources they need to help children avoid drugs, 

alcohol, violence, early sexual activity, and other dangerous behaviors. 

Through the Helping America’s Youth initiative, led by First Lady Laura 

Bush, we are helping children to overcome the challenges they may face 

so they can lead healthy lives and realize their full potential. 

Young people are America’s future leaders, and we can all work to instill 

the values that sustain a free society. On this day and throughout the 

year, I urge our citizens to give their time and talents to benefit our Nation’s 

youth. 

The Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 18, 1928, as amended 

(36 U.S.C. 105), has called for the designation of the first Monday in October 

as ‘‘Child Health Day’’ and has requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this day. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim Monday, October 3, 2005, as Child Health 

Day. I call upon families, schools, child health professionals, faith-based 

and community organizations, and governments to help all our children 

discover the rewards of good health and wellness. 

58288 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–20155 

Filed 10–4–05; 9:56 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
October 22 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6885

LARRY JACOBS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WALTER A. BURCH, a/k/a Sticky, individually

and in his capacity as former Sheriff of

Guilford County, North Carolina; ROBERT COTE,

individually and in his capacity as former

Jailer of the Guilford County Detention

Center; UNIDENTIFIED JAILER, individually and

in her official capacity; B. J. BARNES, in his

official capacity; GUILFORD COUNTY; THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; WALLACE C.

HARRELSON, member of the Guilford County Board

of Commissioners, in his official capacity; W.

G. DUNOVANT, member of the Guilford County

Board of Commissioners, in his official capacity; JOE E. BOSTIC, JR., member of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, in his

official capacity; ROBERT MOORES, member of

the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, in

his official capacity; WARREN DORSETT, member

of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners,

in his official capacity; JOHN PARKS, member

of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners,

in his official capacity; STEVE ARNOLD, member

of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners,

in his official capacity; MARGARET ARBUCKLE,

member of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, in her official capacity; BOB LANDRETH, member of the Guilford County Board of

Commissioners, in his official capacity; CHUCK

WINFREE, member of the Guilford County Board

of Commissioners, in his official capacity;

MELVIN ALSTON, member of the Guilford County

Board of Commissioners, in his official capacity; PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, as surety for

Sheriff Burch; SANDRA AYERS, individually and

in her official capacity,
2

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-95-428-2)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. James Edwin Pons, Susan Moore

Lewis, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; George

W. Miller, HAYWOOD, DENNY, MILLER, JOHNSON, SESSOMS & PATRICK,

Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Jacobs v. Burch, No. CA-95-428-2

(M.D.N.C. May 15 & May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael C. Tsao, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Michael C. Tsao
-------------------
Michael C. Tsao, President & CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       17
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO A. MORENO

- GALLARDO,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71818 Agency No. A077

- 130

- 457

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 2, 2020 * *
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Sergio A. Moreno

- Gallardo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 10 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71818

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia

- Milian v.
Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
W e reject the Government’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s factual findings underlying the denial of asylum and withholding of removal. See Pechenkov v. Holder , 705 F.3d 444, 448 (9th Cir. 2012) ( the jurisdictional bar in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) does not apply when the agency denies relief on the merits rather than in reliance on an applicant’s criminal conviction). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Moreno

Gallardo failed to establish he was or would be persecuted in Mexico on account of a protected ground. See Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in such group”); Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground” ). Thus, Moreno

Gallardo ’s asylum and withholding of removal claim s fail.
Moreno

- Gallardo does not challenge the agency ’s determination that he is ineligible for CAT relief. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 603 19

- 71818

(9th Cir. 1996) (issues not s pecifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived)

. Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Moreno

- Gallardo’s CAT
claim

. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal
because Moreno

- Gallardo raises no colorable legal or constitutional claim. See
Martinez

- Rosas v. Gonzales , 424 F.3d 926, 929

- 30 (9th Cir. 2005) (the court’s jurisdiction over challenges to the agency’s discretionary determination is limited to constitutional claims or question s of law). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Reinstatement, Without Change, of a Previously Approved Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information 
collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until March 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the NCUA Clearance Officer:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax 
No. 703-518-6669, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f727c717e727e6d7e5f717c6a7e31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315c525f505c504350715f5244501f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Part 715, NCUA Rules and Regulations (Existing Parts 701.12 
and 701.13).
    OMB Number: 3133-0059.
    Form Number: NA.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Description: The rule specifies the minimum annual audit a credit 
union is required to obtain according to its charter type and asset 
size, the licensing authority required of persons performing certain 
audits, the auditing principles that apply to certain audits, and the 
accounting principles that must be followed in reports filed with the 
NCUA Board.
    Respondents: Federal credit unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 12,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 5.75 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Reporting and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 100,906 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: None.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on January 27, 
2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-2010 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy BROWN

No. 159P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Attorney at Law, for Brown, Timothy.

Jasmine McGhee, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Timothy Brown, for Brown, Timothy.

T. Lynn Clodfelter, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

*382Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES, INC. v. TOWN OF COLUMBUS, North Carolina

No. 334PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Ryan D. Bolick, Attorney at Law, Virginia M. Wooten, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Town of Columbus, North Carolina.

Benjamin R. Sullivan, Jr., Attorney at Law, for ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc.

*ORDER*

The Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs concerning the following issue:

Did the trial court err in finding that the Town acted arbitrarily and discriminatorily *232on the grounds that the findings of fact, entered by the trial court, when applied to North Carolina law show that the Town's actions were lawful?

Defendant's supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days after the date of this order, plaintiffs supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days following defendant's filing, and defendant's supplemental reply brief shall be filed no later fifteen days following plaintiffs filing.

By order of the Court, this the 7th day of December, 2017.