alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael C. Yerington, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL C. YERINGTON             
|Michael C. Yerington                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 12, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4478 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4478

   To require that any new contract to provide project-based rental 
  assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 
            have a term of 40 years, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that any new contract to provide project-based rental 
  assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 
            have a term of 40 years, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Section 8 Relief Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. 40-YEAR TERMS FOR SECTION 8 PROJECT-BASED CONTRACTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any housing assistance 
payments contract to provide rental assistance under section 8 of the 
United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f) that is attached to 
a structure and is entered into after the date of the enactment of this 
Act shall have a term of 40 years.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Dennis M. Terry                               |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Dennis M. Terry                                   |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|   |   |                                              |   |
|   |   |                                              |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Darlene F. McDonald                           |   |
|   |   | Darlene F. McDonald                               |   |
|   |   | Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2018

Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Exhibit 13.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    |  |                                
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: July 13, 2009                
|                                   
|/s/ Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa
|Name:                               |  | Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa
|Title:                              |  | Chief Executive Officer        
|                                   
|Date: July 13, 2009                
|                                   
|/s/ Alex Waldermar Zornig          
|Name:                               |  | Alex Waldermar Zornig          
|Title:                              |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Jonathan GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-1782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 2003.

Jonathan Griffin, Lake City, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Griffin (Appellant) appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse.

Appellant entered a negotiated plea to charges of first degree murder, robbery with a deadly weapon, burglary of an occupied conveyance, and grand theft auto. He raised three related, legally sufficient, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) failure to inform him of a temporary insanity defense where counsel was aware of Appellant’s prior mental problems and drug abuse; (2) failure to investigate the temporary insanity defense; and (3) mis-advice as to the availability of the voluntary intoxication defense. In the order on appeal, the trial court considered and *adopted*the State’s response with attachments, which indicated the need for an evidentiary hearing. However, the trial court summarily denied the motion without either an evidentiary hearing or an explanation why such a hearing was unnecessary.

In response to this court’s order to show cause, the State once again indicates that either an evidentiary hearing is necessary or the trial court must attach portions of the record conclusively refuting Appellant’s claims. The State acknowledges that the court’s order must be reversed.

We accordingly reverse and remand.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.
# C_2006121EN.01000502.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma lodged on 28 February 2006 — Diagram APS Applicazioni Prodotti Software v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Roma 6

(Case C-118/06)

(2006/C 121/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma (Italy)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Diagram APS Applicazioni Prodotti Software

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Roma 6

Defendant:

Question(s) referred

The Commissione Tributaria provinciale di Roma (Provincial Tax Court Rome) has referred the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:

Must Article 33 of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) (as amended by Directive 91/680/EEC (2)) be interpreted as meaning that net output value arising from regular engagement in independent activities involving the production or exchange of goods or the rendering of services cannot be made liable to IRAP (Imposta Regionale sulle Attività Produttive — Regional tax on businesses)?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 145, 13/06/1977, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 376, 31/12/1991, p. 1.

2

---
#### Larry WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-2943.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 13, 2003.

Larry Wallace, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Harvey v. Dugger,*656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995).

WARNER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        3.1**
 
  **CERTIFICATE
        OF AMENDMENT**
  **TO
        THE**
  **AMENDED
        AND RESTATED**
  **CERTIFICATE
        OF INCORPORATION**
  **OF**
  **GURUNET
        CORPORATION**
 
  **First** :
        The
        name of the corporation (which is hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”)
        is:  GuruNet
        Corporation
  **Second** :
        The
        Corporation wishes to amend its Amended and Restated Certificate of
        Incorporation so as to change the name of the Corporation.
  **Third** :
        To
        accomplish the amendment referred to in Paragraph Second above, Article FIRST
        of
        the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
        is
        hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “The name of the corporation
        is Answers Corporation.”
  **Fourth** :
        This
        Amendment shall be effective as of October 17, 2005.
  **Fifth** :
        The
        foregoing Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
        provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
        Delaware.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, GURUNET CORPORATION has caused this Certificate of Amendment
        to
        be signed by its Chief Financial Officer, under penalties of perjury, this
        14th
        day of October 2005.
   _________________________________
 Steven
        Steinberg, Chief Financial Officer
In the MATTER OF: T.M.S.

No. COA17-380

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 19, 2017

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

eGain Communications Corporation 

Mountain View, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-129854, 333-76692, 333-76690,333-76688, 333-41394, and 333-32854) and Form S-3 (No. 333-48314) of eGain Communications Corporation of our report dated August 8, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule which appears in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. 

 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

San Francisco, California 

 

September 26, 2006
STATE of North Carolina v. Adam TRUESDALE

No. COA18-3

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lukinda M. MOORE

No. COA17-1225

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 454 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 454

 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the 
 ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2013

 Mr. Fattah (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, and Ms. Schwartz) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the 
 ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The medical center of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the medical center 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Center''.
                                 <all>
```
#### **Exhibit 32.1**

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certificationshall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to theextent that such certification is specifically incorporated by reference by theregistrant.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of Metro OneTelecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, Gary E. Henry, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Gary E. Henry          |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Gary E. Henry              |
|   | President, Chief Executive |
|   | Officer                    |
|   |                       |
|   | /s/ Duane C. Fromhart      |
|   | Duane C. Fromhart          |
|   | Senior Vice President,     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

April 2, 2007

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4554 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4554

 To amend the securities laws to improve private market offerings, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2014

  Mr. Mulvaney (for himself and Mrs. Wagner) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the securities laws to improve private market offerings, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restricted Securities Relief Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVING PRIVATE MARKET OFFERINGS.

    (a) Revisions to Regulations.--The Securities and Exchange 
Commission shall--
            (1) revise section 230.144(d)(1)(i) of title 17, Code of 
        Federal Regulations, to change the holding period for 
        restricted securities issued by an issuer that is, and has been 
        for a period of at least 90 days immediately before the sale, 
        subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of 
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from 6 months to 3 months; 
        and
            (2) revise section 230.144(i) of title 17, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, to permit an issuer of securities that was 
        described under paragraph (1) of such section 230.144(i) that 
        has ceased to be an issuer described under such paragraph to 
        sell such securities (subject to the requirements of such 
        section) after two years has elapsed from the date that the 
        issuer files a Form 8-K with the Commission stating that the 
        issuer is no longer described under paragraph (1) of such 
        section.
    (b) Covered Securities.--Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Securities offered or sold under rule 144a.--A 
        security is a covered security if it is offered or sold in 
        compliance with the conditions set forth in section 230.144A of 
        title 17, Code of Federal Regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.4

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P., hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Regency Centers, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2010                                                                 
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general
partner of registrant
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6588** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ERIC MARIO BYERS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:02

- cr - 00077

- RBS

- 1 ; 2:15

- cv - 00072

- RBS )

Submitted : August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eric Mario Byers , Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Mario Byers se eks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appeal ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record a nd conclude that Byers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny the motion for clarification, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Sun River Energy, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donal R. Schmidt, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 22, 2011


/s/ Donal R. Schmidt, Jr.



Donal R. Schmidt, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer