C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Ronnie Dustin Harrison v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 009 60

- C R

Trial court case number: 1302555

Trial court: 178th District Court of Harris County

On September 23 , 2014, we struck a ppellant Ronnie Dustin Harrison ’s brief because it disclosed the name of a sexual assault victim under the age of 17. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 57.02(h) (West Supp. 2014). We ordered appellant to file a corrected brief that did not disclose the victim’s name or other identifying information by October 7, 2014. After appellant failed to comply, we notified the parties and the trial court that if appellant did not file his

corrected brief by December 15, 2014 this Court would abate the appeal and order the trial court to conduct an immediate hearing

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(2). Appellant failed to comply with

the late brief notice. As a result, there is currently no brief on file with the Court of Appeals on appellant’s behalf.

Accordingly, w e abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s

counsel , Andre Ligon, shall be present. T EX

. R. A PP . 38.8(b)(2). Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, a ppellant may participate in the hearing by closed

- circuit video teleconferencing. 1

The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The trial court is directed to:

(1) make a finding on whether appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal; (2) if appe llant wish es to prosecute the ap peal, determine whether counsel Andre Ligon has abandoned the appeal;

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representin g the State or appellant. On appellant’s request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.(3) if counsel Andre Ligon has not abandoned the appeal:

a. inquire of counsel the reasons, if any, that he has failed to file a corrected brief on appellant’s b ehalf;

b. determine whether appellant has paid counsel’s fee for preparing a

corrected appellate brief and determine whether appellant has made any other necessary arrangements for filing a brief; and

c. set a date certain when appellant’s corrected brief is due , regardless of whether this Court has yet reinstated the appeal and no later than 30 days from the date of the hearing; (4) if Andre Ligon has abandoned this appeal, enter a written order relieving Andre Ligon of h is duties as appellant’s counsel, including i n the order the basis for the finding of abandonment, determine whether appellant is indigent, and:

a. if appellant is now indigent, appoint substitute appellate counsel at no expense to appellant;

b. if appellant is not indigent, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self

- representation, and:

i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to counsel and, if so, obtain a written waiver of the right to counsel and set a date certain when appellant’s brief is due, regardless of whether this Court has yet reinstated the appeal and no later than 30 days from the date of the hearing; or,

ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by which appellant must hire an attorney , which must be no more tha n 30 days from the date of the hearing ; (5) make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate; and (6) enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as to these

issues , separate and apart from any docket sheet notations

.

See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 1.051(a), (d)(1), (f) (West Supp. 201 2 ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b); Gonzalez v. State , 117 S.W.3d 831, 837 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice); Webb v. State , 533 S.W.2d 780, 784, 785 (Tex. Crim. Ap p. 1976) (stating that criminal defendant may not manipulate right to choose counsel so as to interfere with fair administration of justice; “The trial court should therefore admonish an accused who desires to represent himself regarding the wisdom and pra ctical consequences of that choice.”); Carter v. State , No. 01

- 95

- 00977

- CR, 1997 WL 184385, *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] April 17, 1997, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication) (“Thus, the public interest in the fair and orderly administration of justice may be greater than an accused’s right to have counsel of his own choice.”); cf

. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 1.051(g) (requiring trial court to advise defendant of dangers and disadvantages of self

- representation prior to proceeding to trial), 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 2012) (authorizing trial court to order appointed counsel to withdraw after finding of good cause is entered on record).

The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and recommendations with this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this

order

. The court reporter is directed to file the reporter’s record of the hearing no later than 30days from the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video tele conference, a certified

video recording of the hearing shall also be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date

of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record and the reporter’s record are filed in this Court. The court coord inator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the Clerk of this Court of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 10, 2015