alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST CLOVER LEAF FINANCIAL CORP.

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Larry W.  Mosby,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Donald  Engelke,  Senior  Vice
President and Chief  Financial  Officer,  of First Clover Leaf  Financial  Corp.
(Company)  each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has
reviewed  the  Quarterly  Report of the  Company on Form  10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 (Report) and that to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      2.    the  information  contained in this Report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                         By: /s/ Larry W. Mosby
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                              Larry W. Mosby
                              President and Chief Executive Officer



                         By: /s/ Donald Engelke
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                              Donald Engelke
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August 9, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 14, 2022

No. 04-22-00011-CR

Frederick O. SILVER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 671214

The Honorable Helen P. Stowe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 9, 2022, we dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Frederick O. Silver’s 

motions for a court order producing video recordings, directing the court reporter to provide 

copies of the reporter’s record, removing Jaime Aldape as his counsel, and striking Aldape’s 

response on January 21, 2022 are denied as moot.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated:        May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Diana M. Laing     
|                           |  | Diana M. Laing         
|                           |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## **Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Richard A. Lozyniak,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blue Ridge Paper Products Inc (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2007
|   | **/S/  RICHARD A. LOZYNIAK**     | ** ** |
|--------|---------------------------------------|------------|
|   | Richard A. Lozyniak                   |       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |       |
|        |                                       |            |  |  |

 

----
# Official Journal L 38/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 38 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 628 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 38

English edition

Legislation

Volume 628 February 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/216 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 January 2019 on the apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 32/2000 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/216 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 January 2019 on the apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 32/2000

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8139** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DARIUS BELLE, a/k/a Dee , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00748

- JFA

- 2; 3:11

- cv - 03520

- JFA )

Submitted : May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Cir cuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Darius Belle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Julius Ness Richardson, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darius Belle seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that th e motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Belle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. Jimmy Lee FORTE, Jr.

223P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Ms. Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Forte, Jimmy Lee (Jr.)

Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Mr. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of July 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Appellate District State of Texas RODERICK BEHAM,

Appellant

v. NO. 06-14-00174-CR Trial Court #14 F 0004 005 STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW Roderick Beham , Appellant, by and through his below named Attorney and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby requests an extension of the time period for the filing of the Appellant’s Brief and in support of same would show the Court as follows: I. A. This case is pending from the 5th Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas. The date of the Judgment is August 29, 2014, with sentence being imposed by the trial court on August 29, 2014. B. The case was styled, “State of Texas v. Roderick Beham., Cause No. 14 F 0004-005. C. Appellant was convicted of the offense of Aggravated Robbery. ACCEPTED 06-14-00174-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/27/2015 4:04:23 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKD. Punishm en t was a ss es se d by the jury to 25 ye ars in the Ins tituti onal

Divis ion of the Texa s D ep artme nt of Crimina l Jus tice. E. The Ap pe llant’s Brie f is due to be filed Mar ch 3 0, 2015. F. Appe lla n t r eque sts an ex tens ion of the filing of Appe llant’s Brief for Forty -Five (45 ) day s, mak ing the Appe llant’s Brief due on May 14, 2015. G. Appe llant’s attorne y has be en dilige nt in re se archin g and pre par ing the Appe llant’s br ief for the Court howe ver , due to couns el’ s pre par ation in a criminal jury trial sty led the State of Arka nsa s v. Tim Howar d, in the Circuit Court of Little Rive r County , Arka nsa s, since be ing app ointed to

re pre se nt Appe llant, couns el has had insuf f i c ient time to comp lete Appe llant’s b rief

. H. Ther e h ave be en no pr evio us r eque sts for e xten sion s in this caus e. I. Couns el for Ap p ellant has contacte d the Ass istant Crimina l Dis trict Attorney for Bowie County , Texa s, w h o i s as sig ne d to this matte r and sh e h as no ob

jection to the re ques t of the Ap pe llant.

II

. Appe llant’s attorne y has be en dilige nt in purs uing this app ea l and is not

se ek ing this exte nsio n for the purp os e o f de lay.

2PRAYER

WHEREFO RE, on the ba sis of the Texa s Rules of Appe llate Proce dure , Appe llant’s attorne y re sp ectfully re ques ts this Court to gr ant the Mo tion for Extens ion of Time for the filing of App ellant’ s Brie f.

Re sp ec tfully sub mitted,
/s/Alwin A. S mi th Alwin A. Sm ith TBN: 185 3220 0 al@a lwinsm ith.com 602 Pine Stre et Texa rka na, Texa s 7 55 01 903 /792- 1608 903 /792- 08 99 Fax

CER TIF ICA TE O F SERVIC E This is to ce rtify that a true and corre ct copy of the ab ove and fore go ing Motion for Extens ion of Time to File Appe llant’s Brief has be en forwa rde d to Ms. Sa m a n th a Og les by , 601 Main Stre et, Texa rka na, Texa s, on this the _27th__ day of

March 20 15. /s/Alwin A. S mi th

Alwin A. Sm ith

3
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Albert B. MACKAREY, Respondent.

No. 724 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 9, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2003, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, ALBERT B. MACK-AREY, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated March 11, 2002, for a period of three months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, ALBERT B. MACKAREY, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4600 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4600

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
         premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2014

Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Broun of 
Georgia, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Franks 
  of Arizona, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Hudson, Mr. 
  Kingston, Mr. Issa, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Wilson of 
South Carolina, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Harris, Mr. 
  Fleming, and Mr. Duncan of South Carolina) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
         premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Free Health Insurance Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating section 224 
as section 225 and by inserting after section 223 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 224. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.

    ``In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a 
deduction to the taxpayer for the taxable year amounts paid by the 
taxpayer for insurance which constitutes medical care (as defined in 
section 213(d)) for the taxpayer and the taxpayer's spouse and 
dependents. No amount shall be taken into account under the preceding 
sentence if a deduction or credit is allowed for such amount under this 
chapter or to any other taxpayer.''.
    (b) Deduction Allowed Whether or Not Individual Itemizes Other 
Deductions.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by inserting before the last sentence at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(22) Deduction for premiums for health insurance.--The 
        deduction allowed by section 224.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part VII of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 224 and adding at the end the following new items:

``Sec. 224. Deduction for premiums for health insurance.
``Sec. 225. Cross reference.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Clark, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 890]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the *637ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 7, 1994 *(People v Clark,*201 AD2d 493), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 3, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Claude COLLINS.

No. 2003-KH-2469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Collins, Claude; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 104,514;

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the pleading to the district court for its consideration. The district court is directed to provide this Court with a copy of its ruling.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I,
William C. Bayless, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of American Campus Communities,
Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(i) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(ii) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:     August
      7, 2009
                        /s/
      William C. Bayless, Jr.William
      C. Bayless, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
STATE v. Reginald Underwood FULLARD

309P15-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Reginald Fullard, for Fullard, Reginald Underwood.

*248The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of April 2018 by Defendant for Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2023-2808 

LT Case No. 2022-DP-001413-X 

_____________________________ 

S.B., MOTHER OF J.S.B., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

S.B. AND C.B.,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.

Kelly J. McKibben, Judge. 

Richard F. Joyce, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, of Office

of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, 

for Appellant. 

Geoffrey P. Golub, of Geoffrey P. Golub, P.A., Melbourne, and 

Kelley Schaeffer, of Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for 

Appellees. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and 

Laura J. Lee, Assistant Director of Appeals, of the Statewide 

Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Morgan Lyle 

Weinstein, of Twig Trade & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale,

for Guardian Ad Litem. 

April 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.
2

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE,, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
STATE of North Carolina, v. Christopher Jamme WHITFIELD, Defendant, and State of North Carolina, v. Corey Levi Banner, Defendant.

No. COA17-184

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL AS TO DEFENDANT WHITFIELD. NO ERROR IN PART. REMANDED FOR CLERICAL ERROR IN PART AS TO DEFENDANT BANNER.
VOGLER REYNOLDA ROAD, LLC v. SCI NORTH CAROLINA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC.

No. 312A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed April 6, 2018

Ward and Smith, P.A., Winterville, by John M. Martin, for plaintiff-appellee.

Moore & Van Allen PLLC, Charlotte, by Anthony T. Lathrop and Glenn E. Ketner, III, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.