alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4562 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4562

     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
 Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of 
                               Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2014

Mr. Smith of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
 Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of 
                               Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within the 
Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska (referred to in 
this section as the ``District'') may repay, at any time, the 
construction costs of project facilities allocated to the landowner's 
land within the District.
    (b) Applicability of Full-Cost Pricing Limitations.--On discharge, 
in full, of the obligation for repayment of all construction costs 
described in subsection (a) that are allocated to all land the 
landowner owns in the District in question, the parcels of land shall 
not be subject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations under 
Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, 
chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act (43 
U.S.C. 371 et seq.), including the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 
U.S.C. 390aa et seq.).
    (c) Certification.--On request of a landowner that has repaid, in 
full, the construction costs described in subsection (a), the Secretary 
of the Interior shall provide to the landowner a certificate described 
in section 213(b)(1) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390mm(b)(1)).
    (d) Effect.--Nothing in this section--
            (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or amends or 
        reopens, the reclamation contract between the District and the 
        United States; or
            (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relationships 
        between the District and landowners in the District under 
        Nebraska State law.
                                 <all>
```
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Respondent, v. Charles T. MATHIS, Petitioner.

No. COA17-752

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 3, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4446 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on matters 

relating to the claiming and interring of unclaimed remains of veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. SHUSTER (for himself, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. 

CARTWRIGHT, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. MEEHAN, and Mr. 

COOK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct 

a study on matters relating to the claiming and interring 

of unclaimed remains of veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dignified Interment 

5 of Our Veterans Act of 2014’’. 


ebenthall on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4446 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STUDY ON 

2 MATTERS RELATING TO CLAIMING AND 

3 INTERRING UNCLAIMED REMAINS OF VET4 ERANS. 

5 (a) STUDY AND REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 

6 one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

7 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— 

8 (1) complete a study on matters relating to the 

9 identification, claiming, and interring of unclaimed 

10 remains of veterans; and 

11 (2) submit to Congress a report on the findings 

12 of the Secretary with respect to the study required 

13 under paragraph (1). 

14 (b) MATTERS STUDIED.—The matters studied under 

15 subsection (a)(1) shall include the following: 

16 (1) Determining the scope of issues relating to 

17 unclaimed remains of veterans, including an esti18 mate of the number of unclaimed remains of vet19 erans on the day before the date of the enactment 

20 of this Act. 

21 (2) Assessing the effectiveness of the proce22 dures of the Department of Veterans Affairs for 

23 claiming and interring unclaimed remains of vet24 erans. 


ebenthall on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4446 IH

1 (3) Identifying and assessing State and local 

2 laws that affect the ability of the Secretary to iden3 tify, claim, and inter unclaimed remains of veterans. 

4 (4) Developing recommendations for such legis5 lative or administrative action as the Secretary con6 siders appropriate. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of eGain



Communications Corporation



|1. | eGain Communications Ltd. (UK)
|-- | ------------------------------



|2. | eGain Communications Pty Ltd. (Australia)
|-- | -----------------------------------------



|3. | eGain (Cayman) Ltd. (Cayman)
|-- | ----------------------------



|4. | eGain Communications Pvt. Ltd. (India)
|-- | --------------------------------------



|5. | eGain communications SrL (Italy)
|-- | --------------------------------



|6. | eGain Communications S.A. (France)
|-- | ----------------------------------



|7. | eGain Japan K.K. (Japan)
|-- | ------------------------



|8. | eGain Communications B.V. (Netherlands)
|-- | ---------------------------------------



|9. | eGain Communications GmbH (Germany)
|-- | -----------------------------------



|10. | eGain Communications Ltd. (Ireland)
|--- | -----------------------------------



|11. | eGain Communications Pacific Pte. Ltd (Singapore)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 176

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Emma Charlotte Pieper, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20220084

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central

Judicial District, the Honorable M. Jason McCarthy, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Vanessa Sigette, under the 

Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, North Dakota,

for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Challis D. Williams, Grand Forks, North Dakota, for defendant and appellant; 

submitted on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

State v. Pieper

No. 20220084

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Emma Pieper appeals from an amended criminal judgment after 

entering a conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence and driving 

under suspension. On appeal, she argues that the law enforcement officer 

lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify the stop of her vehicle, 

thus violating the Fourth Amendment and the North Dakota Constitution. We 

conclude the officer’s observations were sufficient to raise a reasonable and 

articulable suspicion justifying the traffic stop. Kappel v. Dir., N.D. Dep’t of 

Transp., 1999 ND 213, ¶¶ 9-12, 602 N.W.2d 718 (An officer may have 

reasonable and articulable suspicion after observing “‘a series of acts, each of 

them perhaps innocent in itself, but which taken together warranted further 

investigation.’”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] ES-053597, Group No. 161, Wisconsin


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin

T. 40 N., R. 6 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of the Fourth 
Standard Parallel North in Range 6 West, a portion of the Fourth 
Standard Parallel North in Range 7 West, a portion of the south and 
west boundaries, a portion of the subdivisional lines; and the 
subdivision of certain sections, the reestablishment of a portion of 
the record meander line and a survey of a portion of the present shore 
line of James Lake, and the apportionment of the shore line frontage to 
the original lots 2 and 3 in section 20, Township 40 North, Range 6 
West, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, and was accepted September 
29, 2005. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open 
files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest. We will not officially file 
the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests 
and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05-20052 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
In the MATTER OF: T.D.H., a minor child.

No. COA17-956

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 3, 2018

REVERSED.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2005 / Presidential Documents 58283 

Proclamation 7937 of September 30, 2005 

National Disability Employment Awareness Month, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Across America, individuals with disabilities are making important contributions in the workplace. This month, we celebrate their accomplishments 

and reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the opportunities of America 

are available and accessible to every citizen. 

Fifteen years ago, President George H. W. Bush signed into law the Americans 

with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), reducing barriers for millions of Americans with disabilities and providing a mandate for the elimination of discrimination in the workplace and in the community. Since the ADA was 

enacted, people with disabilities have been able to participate more fully 

in the workforce, and our Nation has become stronger and more just. Yet 

more work remains, and we continue our efforts to enable Americans with 

disabilities to live and work with greater freedom. 

In the spirit of the ADA, my Administration’s New Freedom Initiative has 

expanded access to assistive technologies, education, and opportunities for 

people with disabilities to integrate into the workforce. I signed into law 

legislation that improves the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

to ensure that our young people with disabilities are prepared for the many 

opportunities ahead. Through these and other efforts, we are working to 

ensure that Americans with disabilities can realize the promise of America. 

To recognize the contributions of Americans with disabilities and to encourage all citizens to ensure equal opportunity in the workforce, the Congress, 

by joint resolution approved as amended (36 U.S.C. 121), has designated 

October of each year as ‘‘National Disability Employment Awareness Month.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 2005 as National Disability Employment Awareness Month. I call upon Government officials, labor leaders, 

employers, and the people of the United States to observe this month with 

appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–20153 

Filed 10–4–05; 9:56 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 ofthe United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Voyager Oil &Gas Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Voyager Oil &Gas, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2010, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Voyager Oil & Gas, Inc. This written statement isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to suchForm 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided toVoyager Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Voyager Oil &Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 
| Date:  May 19, 2010 | /s/ *James Russell (J.R.) Reger* |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                     | James Russell  (J.R.) Reger      |
|                     | Chief Executive  Officer         |
|                     |                             |
| Date:  May 19, 2010 | /s/ *Mitchell R. Thompson*       |
|                     | Mitchell R.  Thompson            |
|                     | Interim Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-05941) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Issuance
Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Infoseek Corporation of our report
dated January 28, 1997, except as to Note 12 as to which the date is March 31,
1997, with respect to the financial statements of Infoseek Corporation included
in the 1996 Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Infoseek
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.



                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 31, 1997
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00629

- CR

Kevin Apolinar JOHNS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR2450

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 10, 2019.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4562 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District 

in the State of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4562 RFS

1 SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

3 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

4 any landowner within the Northport Irrigation District in 

5 the State of Nebraska (referred to in this section as the 

6 ‘‘District’’) may repay, at any time, the construction costs 

7 of project facilities allocated to the landowner’s land with8 in the District. 

9 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA10 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay11 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

12 that are allocated to all land the landowner owns in the 

13 District in question, the parcels of land shall not be sub14 ject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 

15 under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 

16 32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

17 and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), in18 cluding the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 

19 390aa et seq.). 

20 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

21 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub22 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

23 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 

24 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

25 390mm(b)(1)). 

26 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4562 RFS

1 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

2 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

3 the District and the United States; or 

4 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation5 ships between the District and landowners in the 

6 District under Nebraska State law. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23.2
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
333-61467 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos. 333-118861, 333-74490,
333-26743, Post-Effective Amendment No.1 on Registration Statement No. 333-74065
on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Registration Statement No.
333-53679 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 on Registration Statement
No. 333-39013 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 on Registration
Statement No. 333-35561 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 333-36337 on
Form S-3, and Registration Nos. 333-60595 and 333-59201 on Form S-3 of our
reports dated March 28, 2008, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Cenveo, Inc. (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the
adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the Company's
internal control over financial reporting), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Cenveo, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2007.
 
 /S/DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
 
 
 Stamford,
Connecticut
 March
28, 2008
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6**  **59 2** 

ALAN B. FABIAN ,
P etitioner

– Appell ant ,

v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE ; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent s – Appell ee s .

Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1 : 0 9

- c v - 0 2938

- CCB )

Submitted : Ju ly 2 7 , 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON a nd KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affir me d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Alan B. Fabian , Appellant Pro Se

. Jonathan S. Cohen, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C. , for Appellee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Alan B. Fabian appeal s from the district court ’ s order
d enying hi s petition to quash a third

- party recordkeeper summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service and ordering enforcement
of the summons. We have reviewed the record and the distric t court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no clear

error. Accordingly, we affi rm for the reasons stated by the
district c ourt. Fabian v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , No. 1:09

-

cv - 02938

- CCB ( D. Md. filed Apr. 7, 2010; entered Apr

. 8 , 2010 ).

We d ispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### INSURANCE FEDERATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner, v. Diane KOKEN, Insurance Commissioner, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issues:

> 1. Whether the Insurance Department possesses the statutory authority to require that all uninsured and underin-sured motorist disputes be submitted to mandatory, binding arbitration?

> 2. Whether the issue of whether the Insurance Department’s imposition of mandatory, binding arbitration upon uninsured and underinsured motorist disputes violates the Constitutional right to a jury trial of both insurers and insurance consumers was waived, and if not, whether the imposition of such arbitration, in fact, violates the Constitutional right to a jury trial?
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice D. Codner, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 356]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 2, 1987 *(.People v Codner,*134 AD2d 272), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 7, 1985.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cesar
Villavicencio, CEO and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Cesar  Villavicencio
-------------------------------
Cesar Villavicencio
CEO and Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 12, 2005