alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald Wayne BLACK

No. 287P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Patrick M. Megaro, Attorney at Law, for Black, Donald

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *380***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of September 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
Exhibit 31.2

I, Frank S. Yuan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Cyber Merchants Exchange,  Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the  registrant  and have: a)
designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which  this  report is being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such  evaluation;  and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent two-month period that has materially  affected,  or
is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons   performing  the  equivalent   functions):   a)  all   significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the design or  operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report  financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other  employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 26, 2005

/s/ Frank S. Yuan
-----------------
Frank S. Yuan
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie Odell WHITEHEAD Jr.

No. COA17-1320

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 20, 2017

No. 04-16-00711-CV

John DEVILBISS,

Appellant

v.

Majorie BURCH,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV04843

Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due May 8, 2017. After this court struck appellant’s 

original brief for failure to comply with the briefing rules, appellant’s amended brief was due 

July 17, 2017. Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time asking for an additional seven 

days in which to file his amended brief. After review, we GRANT appellant’s motion and 

ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before July 24, 2017. Appellant is reminded 

that in his motions, he is required to include a “certificate of conference” showing he has 

conferred about the merits of the motion with counsel for appellee and whether counsel is 

opposed or unopposed to the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(f). Appellant should include a 

certificate of conference in any future motions filed in this court.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0776

_____________________________

JOHNNY WALTHOUR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

October 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Johnny Walthour, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JANNIFER THOMAS

, Appellant,

v.

ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3222

[ November 29, 2018 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings;

DOAH Case No. 16

- 5872TTS

.

Thomas L. Johnson of the Law Offices of Thomas Johnson, Brandon,

for appellant.

Glen J. Torcivia and Matthew L. Ransdell of Torcivia, Donlon,

Goddeau & Ansay, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, C I KLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE v. John Edward BUTLER

629P01-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

John Edward Butler, Raleigh, for Butler, John Edward.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of February 2018 by Defendant for Preservation of Evidence and Post-Conviction of DNA Testing:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Visual Management Systems, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James D. Gardner, Chief
      Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                James D. GardnerChief
                Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Laris SUTTON

No. 209P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Julie C. Boyer, Attorney at Law, for Sutton, Laris.

Kacy L. Hunt, Attorney at Law, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of July 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
#### Peter Mack et al., *Appellants,*v. C. O. Devers et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 19, 1928.

*Allison E. Palmer,*for Appellants;

*Maguire & Voorhis,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *957inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
#### In the Matter of Abdoulai A. SWAREH, Esquire A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

No. 03-BG-622.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

July 24, 2003.

Before: TERRY and STEADMAN, Associate Judges; and KING, Senior Judge.

*237ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Ab-doulai A. Swareh, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 24th day of July, 2008

ORDERED that the said Abdoulai A. Swareh, is hereby disbarred by consent, effective immediately. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run for reinstatement purposes from the date he files his affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.
Order filed, March 8, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00143-CV

____________

IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF TIMOTHY WAYNE STONECIPHER, 

Appellant

V.

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 608785Z

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 16, 2018. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

remailing portion of the record. The complete record has not been filed with the 

court. Because the complete reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue 

the following order.
We order Gail Rolen, the court reporter, to file the remaining portions of the 

record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11425 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LINDA D. MCCANLESS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-11-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Linda D. McCanless appeals from her conviction for solicitation to murder Kenneth Walker and for interstate travel to hire an individual to murder Sandra Scott. McCanless challenges her interstate travel conviction by arguing that the district court should have acquitted her of the charge because the evidence did not indicate that she had the requisite intent to murder before or during her interstate travel. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. WeNo. 96-11425 -2- conclude that the district court did not err in its determination. See United States v. Edelman , 873 F.2d 791, 793- 95 (5th Cir. 1989). AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet February 18, 2005, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-committees, (4) Discussion/approval of projects, (5) Old Business, (6) Matters before the group-discussion only, and (7) Next agenda and meeting date.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on February 18, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by May 18, 2004. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

Dated: January 24, 2005.

Blaine Baker,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-2030 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20085 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-149-3
- - - - - - - - - - November 11, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James Edward Johnson appeals his convictions for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, using a fictitious name in connection with mail fraud, and money laundering and aiding and abetting in the commission of mail fraud. He contends that the Government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a knowing participant in the fraudulent telemarketing scheme. Our review of the record and the arguments and authoritiesNo. 96-20085 -2- convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Johnson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Krenning , 93 F.3d 1257, 1265 (5th Cir. 1996). AFFIRMED.
## TEEA~TORNEYGENEEZAL QF TEXAS omma.nm AUSTIN H. TEXAS .Al-rolR--am=RAL

Honorable A. J. Luakett County Attorney 

### a0m aoutt*y HewBraunfsls, Texa8 Dear Sir: Opinion No. o-1770 Ret Shares of atock in federal savinga and loan assoolations **are exp~keS8ly**  authorized **by Artlole**  **0th~~ Sec.**  **24,** as Inveatmenta for administratora, executors, guardlane, trusteer ahd other ~lduolarles. lie are pleased to reply to your l&tter of February 3, 1940, addressed to Oereld C, Mann, wherein you request an opinion of this department on @thevalidity. 01,8har86 ln Federal $avln$s and Low AsoooIatlonr a8 inverrtments for guardian@, administrators, tnaeteel),and other fiduaiaries.” Artlole 8&a, of the Wevlred Civil Statutes of Texw, to whioh you ref ’ec, leave6 the matter in oonslderable doubt inasmuch as it reierf# only to oollateral trust ‘imrt i&gee,,bond@, debentures, notes, lndebtednese. ” 06wtlf oateac ! and other such evldenars of FoPtunately, however, any doubt on this queatlon has been removed by Senate Bill 100. 13, enaated by the Regular Session of the 46th tegirrlatwe, Aota, 1939, whloh 

### appears a8 Artlole 

### &la, **Seot%on** 24, of **V4mon~r** Annotated Texas Statutes, 1925, aa amended. This Artiale reads in **part** as follower “Admknlstratom, 

### exeeutom,guardlan6, trustees or other 

### flduolaries,

rmyrIn suoh oepaalty ior a named ben6fiolary, acquire **and** hold &area 0~ lWu?eewountr In any building and loan asaoclafion organtsed under the rawa of this State* or in any **Federal** savings **and** loan aeroolation domIoil&d lwthle State and shall have the 6ame right8 and be mbject to th6 Eameobli&$ions(l privllegea and remedies a8 

### othershareholders and member‘e,
. . .Honorable A, J, Iuokett, me .s?#Q-1770

By virtue of the express terms of the above quoted statute, you have unqueetlonably been oorreat in advleing your Pro)ata Judge that eharea of etook in a Federal &wing8 and Loan Aeeoolation are valid investments for all flduoiarlee. Yours very truly AT’I’OR?XSY

QENERAL

OFTEXAS a/ vllalter R. Koch

Walter R. Koch Aeeletant
APPROVED

FISB.8, 19

’40 S/ fferald C

. Menn yy?yy la@mukLOF‘I’sxJu WRlcI o/ego APPROVED

OPINION

CONMITTJSE~ By BUB, Chalman~
#### In re Appeal of Disciplinary Board Decision No. 02-PDB-153.

No. 2003-OB-1764.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Simpson, Jesse C.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 02-PDB-153.

Leave to appeal denied.
Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries of Berry Plastics Corporation
Berry Iowa Corporation (DE)
Packerware Corporation (DE)
Knight Plastics, Inc. (DE)
Berry Sterling Corporation (DE)
Berry Plastics Design Corporation (DE)
Poly-Seal Corporation (DE)
Venture Packaging, Inc. (DE)
Venture Packaging Midwest, Inc. (DE)
Berry Plastics Technical Services, Inc. (DE)
CPI Holding Corporation (DE)
Cardinal Packaging, Inc. (OH)
AeroCon, Inc. (DE)
Pescor, Inc. (DE)
Berry Tri-Plas Corporation (DE)
Landis Plastics, Inc. (IL)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation II (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation III (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation V (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation VI (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation VII (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation VIII (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation IX (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation X (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation XI (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation XII (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation XIII (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation XIV, LLC (DE)
Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation XV, LLC (DE)
NIM Holdings Limited (E&W)
Berry Plastics U.K. Limited (E&W)
Norwich Acquisition Limited (E&W)
Capsol Berry Plastics S.p.A. (Italy)
Ociesse S.r.l. (Italy)
**EXHIBIT 10**
March 27, 2002
Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20549
**RE: Release Nos. 33-8070; 34-45590,35-27503, 39-2395, IA-2018; IC-25464; FR-62;****File No. S7-03-02 (the“Release”)**
Dear Sir or Madam:
     In accordance with the Release, you are herebynotified that Versatel Telecom International N.V.(“Versatel”) has received from Arthur AndersenAccountants (“Andersen”) representations that(i) the audit of Versatel’s financial statements forthe year-ended December 31, 2001 was subject toAndersen’s quality control systems for U.S. accounting andauditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that theengagement was conducted in compliance with professionalstandards, and (ii) there was appropriate continuity ofAndersen personnel working on the audit, availability ofnational office consultation, and availability of personnel atforeign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portionsof the audit.
Very truly yours,
/s/ MARK R. LAZARChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(b) AND
                  SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
                    UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kahiki Foods, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Michael C. Tsao
-------------------
Michael C. Tsao
President and CEO
February 14, 2005

/s/ Julia A. Fratianne
----------------------
Julia A. Fratianne
Treasurer and CFO
February 14, 2005

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be
deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

                                       17