# Official Journal C 392/20 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 392 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6020 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 392

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6020 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2017/C 392/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2017/C 392/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2017/C 392/02 | Case C-85/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court) | 2 |
| 2017/C 392/03 | Joined Cases C-86/15 P and C-87/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Ferriera Valsabbia SpA (C-86/15 P), Valsabbia Investimenti SpA (C-86/15 P), Alfa Acciai SpA (C-87/15 P) v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court) | 3 |
| 2017/C 392/04 | Case C-88/15 P P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision) | 3 |
| 2017/C 392/05 | Case C-89/15 P P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Riva Fire SpA, in liquidation v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court) | 4 |
| 2017/C 392/06 | Case C-326/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa — Latvia) — ‘DNB BANKA’ AS v Valsts ienemumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members — Applicability to financial services) | 5 |
| 2017/C 392/07 | Joined Cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Easy Sanitary Solutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Group Nivelles NV (Appeal — Intellectual property — Community designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 5 — Novelty — Article 6 — Individual character — Article 7 — Disclosure to the public — Article 63 — Powers of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the taking of evidence — Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity — Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design — Design for a shower drainage channel — Dismissal of an application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal) | 5 |
| 2017/C 392/08 | Case C-605/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Aviva Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. w Warszawie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members — Applicability to insurance) | 6 |
| 2017/C 392/09 | Case C-616/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemption for services supplied to their members by independent groups of persons — Restriction to independent groups whose members exercise a limited number of professions) | 7 |
| 2017/C 392/10 | Case C-125/16: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Prim’Awla tal-Qorti Ċivili — Malta) — Malta Dental Technologists Association, John Salomone Reynaud v Superintendent tas-Saħħa Pubblika, Kunsill tal-Professjonijiet Kumplimentari għall-Mediċina (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2005/36/EC — Recognition of professional qualifications — Dental technologists — Conditions governing the practice of the profession in the host Member State — Requirement for the compulsory intermediation of a dental practitioner — Application of that requirement in the case of clinical dental technologists pursuing their profession in the home Member State — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Restriction — Justification — Public interest objective of ensuring the protection of public health — Proportionality) | 7 |
| 2017/C 392/11 | Case C-149/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia-Śródmieścia — Poland) — Halina Socha, Dorota Olejnik, Anna Skomra v Szpital Specjalistyczny im. A. Falkiewicza we Wrocławiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘redundancies’ — Assimilation to redundancies of ‘terminations of an employment contract which occur on the employer’s initiative’ — Unilateral amendment by the employer of pay and working conditions) | 8 |
| 2017/C 392/12 | Case C-171/16: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — Trayan Beshkov v Sofiyska rayonna prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Scope — Taking into account, in the course of new criminal proceedings, a previous conviction handed down in another Member State, in order to impose an overall sentence — National procedure for prior recognition of that conviction — Altering the arrangements for enforcing the sentence imposed in the other Member State) | 9 |
| 2017/C 392/13 | Case C-429/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — Małgorzata Ciupa and Others v II Szpital Miejski im. L. Rydygiera w Łodzi, now Szpital Ginekologiczno-Położniczy im. dr L. Rydygiera sp. z o.o. w Łodzi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1) and Article 2 — Concept of ‘redundancies’ — Assimilation to redundancies of ‘terminations of an employment contract which occur on the employer’s initiative’ — Unilateral amendment by the employer of working and pay conditions — Determination of the employer’s ‘intention’ to effect redundancies) | 10 |
| 2017/C 392/14 | Case C-441/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție — Romania) — SMS group GmbH v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Eighth Directive 79/1072/EEC — Directive 2006/112/EC — Taxable person residing in another Member State — Refund of VAT charged on imported goods — Conditions — Objective elements confirming the intention of the taxable person to use the imported goods in the course of his economic activities — Serious risk of non-completion of the transaction that justified the importation) | 10 |
| 2017/C 392/15 | Case C-35/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza (Poland) lodged on 24 January 2017 — Saferoad Grawil sp. z o.o., Saferoad Kabex sp. z o.o. v Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad Oddział w Poznaniu | 11 |
| 2017/C 392/16 | Case C-463/17 P: Appeal brought on 25 July 2017 by Ori Martin SA against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 1 June 2017 in Case T-797/16 Ori Martin v Court of Justice of the European Union | 12 |
| 2017/C 392/17 | Case C-485/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2017 — Verbraucherzentrale Berlin e.V. v Unimatic Vertriebs GmbH | 13 |
| 2017/C 392/18 | Case C-501/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2017 — Germanwings GmbH v Wolfgang Pauels | 13 |
| 2017/C 392/19 | Case C-516/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 August 2017 — Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck | 14 |
| 2017/C 392/20 | Case C-517/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 28 August 2017 — Milkiyas Addis v Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 15 |
| 2017/C 392/21 | Case C-518/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 August 2017 — Stefan Rudigier | 16 |
| 2017/C 392/22 | Case C-569/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain | 17 |
| | General Court |
| 2017/C 392/23 | Case T-149/15: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Legal basis — Reinclusion of the applicant’s name on the basis of new grounds — Obligation to state reasons — Factual basis — Right to property — Proportionality) | 19 |
| 2017/C 392/24 | Case T-175/15: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Mabrouk v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds — Continued listing of the applicant’s name — Inadequate factual basis — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law — Right to property — Principle of good administration — Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time — Presumption of innocence — Request for modification — Confirmatory measure — Inadmissibility) | 20 |
| 2017/C 392/25 | Case T-126/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2017 — 1. FC Köln v EUIPO (SPÜRBAR ANDERS.) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark SPÜRBAR ANDERS. — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 21 |
| 2017/C 392/26 | Case T-139/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2017 — SDSR v EUIPO — Berghaus (BERG OUTDOOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BERG OUTDOOR — Earlier EU word marks BERGHAUS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 21 |
| 2017/C 392/27 | Case T-143/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2017 — Intesa Sanpaolo v EUIPO — Intesia Group Holding (INTESA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark INTESA — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark) | 22 |
| 2017/C 392/28 | Case T-176/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2017 — Kofola ČeskoSlovensko v EUIPO — Mionetto (UGO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark UGO — Earlier EU figurative mark il UGO! — Partial surrender of the earlier mark — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 23 |
| 2017/C 392/29 | Case T-336/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo v EUIPO — Gianni Versace (VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO — Earlier EU word mark VERSACE — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 23 |
| 2017/C 392/30 | Case T-337/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo v EUIPO — Gianni Versace (VERSACCINO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark VERSACCINO — Earlier EU word mark VERSACE — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 24 |
| 2017/C 392/31 | Case T-36/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Forest Pharma v EUIPO — Ipsen Pharma (COLINEB) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark COLINEB — Earlier national figurative mark Colina — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 25 |
| 2017/C 392/32 | Case T-97/09: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded) | 26 |
| 2017/C 392/33 | Case T-21/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded) | 27 |
| 2017/C 392/34 | Case T-104/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — RESIDER II programme — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded) | 27 |
| 2017/C 392/35 | Case T-114/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Programme Interreg II/C programme ‘Rhine-Meuse flood’ — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded) | 28 |
| 2017/C 392/36 | Case T-542/15: Order of the General Court of 25 September 2017 — Hungary v Commission (ERDF — Operational Programme ‘Transport’ and Regional Operational Programmes for Central Hungary, West Pannon, South Great Plain, Central Transdanubia, North Hungary, North Great Plain and South Transdanubia — Decision to suspend the interim payments — Repeal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate) | 29 |
| 2017/C 392/37 | Case T-297/16 P: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Gyarmathy v EMCDDA (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — EMCDDA staff — Decision not to renew a contract of employment — Termination of the contract — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Administrative inquiry — Impartiality of the inquiry) | 29 |
| 2017/C 392/38 | Case T-402/16: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinGas) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark berlinGas — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly unfounded in law) | 30 |
| 2017/C 392/39 | Case T-719/16: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark berlinWärme — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly unfounded in law) | 31 |
| 2017/C 392/40 | Case T-40/17: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO (Here Global (h) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 31 |
| 2017/C 392/41 | Case T-443/17 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — António Conde & Companhia v Commission (Application for interim measures — Fishing vessels — Regional fisheries management organisation for the North-East Atlantic — Application for interim measures — No urgency) | 32 |
| 2017/C 392/42 | Case T-570/17: Action brought on 17 August 2017 — Algebris (UK) and Others v Commission | 32 |
| 2017/C 392/43 | Case T-607/17: Action brought on 6 September 2017 — Volotea v Commission | 34 |
| 2017/C 392/44 | Case T-626/17: Action brought on 15 September 2017 – Slovenia v Commission | 35 |
| 2017/C 392/45 | Case T-645/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB | 36 |
| 2017/C 392/46 | Case T-646/17: Action brought on 22 September 2017 — Addicion Sicav and Others v SRB | 37 |
| 2017/C 392/47 | Case T-647/17: Action brought on 22 September 2017 — Serendipity and Others v EUIPO — CKL Holdings (CHIARA FERRAGNI) | 38 |
| 2017/C 392/48 | Case T-677/17: Action brought on 2 October 2017 — ClientEarth v Commission | 38 |
| 2017/C 392/49 | Case T-700/15: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2017 — Volfas Engelman v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchstäfte (BRAVORO PINTA) | 40 |
| 2017/C 392/50 | Case T-56/16: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Oil Pension Fund Investment Company v Council | 40 |
| 2017/C 392/51 | Case T-158/16: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Barnett and Others v EESC | 40 |
| 2017/C 392/52 | Case T-299/16: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Scheffler v EUIPO — Doc Generici (docfauna) | 40 |
| 2017/C 392/53 | Case T-18/17: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2017 — Czech Republic v Commission | 41 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2017/C 392/02

Case C-85/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court)

2

2017/C 392/03

Joined Cases C-86/15 P and C-87/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Ferriera Valsabbia SpA (C-86/15 P), Valsabbia Investimenti SpA (C-86/15 P), Alfa Acciai SpA (C-87/15 P) v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court)

3

2017/C 392/04

Case C-88/15 P P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision)

3

2017/C 392/05

Case C-89/15 P P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Riva Fire SpA, in liquidation v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian producers of reinforcing bars — Fixing of prices and limiting and controlling output and sales — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Annulment of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Decision re-adopted on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Failure to issue a new statement of objections — Lack of a hearing following the annulment of the initial decision — Time taken in the proceedings before the General Court)

4

2017/C 392/06

Case C-326/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa — Latvia) — ‘DNB BANKA’ AS v Valsts ienemumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members — Applicability to financial services)

5

2017/C 392/07

Joined Cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — Easy Sanitary Solutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Group Nivelles NV (Appeal — Intellectual property — Community designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 5 — Novelty — Article 6 — Individual character — Article 7 — Disclosure to the public — Article 63 — Powers of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the taking of evidence — Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity — Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design — Design for a shower drainage channel — Dismissal of an application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal)

5

2017/C 392/08

Case C-605/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Aviva Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. w Warszawie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members — Applicability to insurance)

6

2017/C 392/09

Case C-616/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(f) — Exemption for services supplied to their members by independent groups of persons — Restriction to independent groups whose members exercise a limited number of professions)

7

2017/C 392/10

Case C-125/16: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Prim’Awla tal-Qorti Ċivili — Malta) — Malta Dental Technologists Association, John Salomone Reynaud v Superintendent tas-Saħħa Pubblika, Kunsill tal-Professjonijiet Kumplimentari għall-Mediċina (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2005/36/EC — Recognition of professional qualifications — Dental technologists — Conditions governing the practice of the profession in the host Member State — Requirement for the compulsory intermediation of a dental practitioner — Application of that requirement in the case of clinical dental technologists pursuing their profession in the home Member State — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Restriction — Justification — Public interest objective of ensuring the protection of public health — Proportionality)

7

2017/C 392/11

Case C-149/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia-Śródmieścia — Poland) — Halina Socha, Dorota Olejnik, Anna Skomra v Szpital Specjalistyczny im. A. Falkiewicza we Wrocławiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘redundancies’ — Assimilation to redundancies of ‘terminations of an employment contract which occur on the employer’s initiative’ — Unilateral amendment by the employer of pay and working conditions)

8

2017/C 392/12

Case C-171/16: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — Trayan Beshkov v Sofiyska rayonna prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Scope — Taking into account, in the course of new criminal proceedings, a previous conviction handed down in another Member State, in order to impose an overall sentence — National procedure for prior recognition of that conviction — Altering the arrangements for enforcing the sentence imposed in the other Member State)

9

2017/C 392/13

Case C-429/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — Małgorzata Ciupa and Others v II Szpital Miejski im. L. Rydygiera w Łodzi, now Szpital Ginekologiczno-Położniczy im. dr L. Rydygiera sp. z o.o. w Łodzi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1) and Article 2 — Concept of ‘redundancies’ — Assimilation to redundancies of ‘terminations of an employment contract which occur on the employer’s initiative’ — Unilateral amendment by the employer of working and pay conditions — Determination of the employer’s ‘intention’ to effect redundancies)

10

2017/C 392/14

Case C-441/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție — Romania) — SMS group GmbH v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Eighth Directive 79/1072/EEC — Directive 2006/112/EC — Taxable person residing in another Member State — Refund of VAT charged on imported goods — Conditions — Objective elements confirming the intention of the taxable person to use the imported goods in the course of his economic activities — Serious risk of non-completion of the transaction that justified the importation)

10

2017/C 392/15

Case C-35/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza (Poland) lodged on 24 January 2017 — Saferoad Grawil sp. z o.o., Saferoad Kabex sp. z o.o. v Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad Oddział w Poznaniu

11

2017/C 392/16

Case C-463/17 P: Appeal brought on 25 July 2017 by Ori Martin SA against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 1 June 2017 in Case T-797/16 Ori Martin v Court of Justice of the European Union

12

2017/C 392/17

Case C-485/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2017 — Verbraucherzentrale Berlin e.V. v Unimatic Vertriebs GmbH

13

2017/C 392/18

Case C-501/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2017 — Germanwings GmbH v Wolfgang Pauels

13

2017/C 392/19

Case C-516/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 August 2017 — Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck

14

2017/C 392/20

Case C-517/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 28 August 2017 — Milkiyas Addis v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

15

2017/C 392/21

Case C-518/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 August 2017 — Stefan Rudigier

16

2017/C 392/22

Case C-569/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

17

General Court

2017/C 392/23

Case T-149/15: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Legal basis — Reinclusion of the applicant’s name on the basis of new grounds — Obligation to state reasons — Factual basis — Right to property — Proportionality)

19

2017/C 392/24

Case T-175/15: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Mabrouk v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds — Continued listing of the applicant’s name — Inadequate factual basis — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law — Right to property — Principle of good administration — Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time — Presumption of innocence — Request for modification — Confirmatory measure — Inadmissibility)

20

2017/C 392/25

Case T-126/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2017 — 1. FC Köln v EUIPO (SPÜRBAR ANDERS.) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark SPÜRBAR ANDERS. — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

21

2017/C 392/26

Case T-139/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2017 — SDSR v EUIPO — Berghaus (BERG OUTDOOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BERG OUTDOOR — Earlier EU word marks BERGHAUS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

21

2017/C 392/27

Case T-143/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2017 — Intesa Sanpaolo v EUIPO — Intesia Group Holding (INTESA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark INTESA — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark)

22

2017/C 392/28

Case T-176/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2017 — Kofola ČeskoSlovensko v EUIPO — Mionetto (UGO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark UGO — Earlier EU figurative mark il UGO! — Partial surrender of the earlier mark — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

23

2017/C 392/29

Case T-336/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo v EUIPO — Gianni Versace (VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO — Earlier EU word mark VERSACE — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

23

2017/C 392/30

Case T-337/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo v EUIPO — Gianni Versace (VERSACCINO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark VERSACCINO — Earlier EU word mark VERSACE — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

24

2017/C 392/31

Case T-36/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2017 — Forest Pharma v EUIPO — Ipsen Pharma (COLINEB) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark COLINEB — Earlier national figurative mark Colina — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

25

2017/C 392/32

Case T-97/09: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded)

26

2017/C 392/33

Case T-21/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded)

27

2017/C 392/34

Case T-104/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — RESIDER II programme — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded)

27

2017/C 392/35

Case T-114/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Programme Interreg II/C programme ‘Rhine-Meuse flood’ — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded)

28

2017/C 392/36

Case T-542/15: Order of the General Court of 25 September 2017 — Hungary v Commission (ERDF — Operational Programme ‘Transport’ and Regional Operational Programmes for Central Hungary, West Pannon, South Great Plain, Central Transdanubia, North Hungary, North Great Plain and South Transdanubia — Decision to suspend the interim payments — Repeal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate)

29

2017/C 392/37

Case T-297/16 P: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Gyarmathy v EMCDDA (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — EMCDDA staff — Decision not to renew a contract of employment — Termination of the contract — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Administrative inquiry — Impartiality of the inquiry)

29

2017/C 392/38

Case T-402/16: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinGas) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark berlinGas — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly unfounded in law)

30

2017/C 392/39

Case T-719/16: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark berlinWärme — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly unfounded in law)

31

2017/C 392/40

Case T-40/17: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO (Here Global (h) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

31

2017/C 392/41

Case T-443/17 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — António Conde & Companhia v Commission (Application for interim measures — Fishing vessels — Regional fisheries management organisation for the North-East Atlantic — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

32

2017/C 392/42

Case T-570/17: Action brought on 17 August 2017 — Algebris (UK) and Others v Commission

32

2017/C 392/43

Case T-607/17: Action brought on 6 September 2017 — Volotea v Commission

34

2017/C 392/44

Case T-626/17: Action brought on 15 September 2017 – Slovenia v Commission

35

2017/C 392/45

Case T-645/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB

36

2017/C 392/46

Case T-646/17: Action brought on 22 September 2017 — Addicion Sicav and Others v SRB

37

2017/C 392/47

Case T-647/17: Action brought on 22 September 2017 — Serendipity and Others v EUIPO — CKL Holdings (CHIARA FERRAGNI)

38

2017/C 392/48

Case T-677/17: Action brought on 2 October 2017 — ClientEarth v Commission

38

2017/C 392/49

Case T-700/15: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2017 — Volfas Engelman v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchstäfte (BRAVORO PINTA)

40

2017/C 392/50

Case T-56/16: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Oil Pension Fund Investment Company v Council

40

2017/C 392/51

Case T-158/16: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Barnett and Others v EESC

40

2017/C 392/52

Case T-299/16: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Scheffler v EUIPO — Doc Generici (docfauna)

40

2017/C 392/53

Case T-18/17: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2017 — Czech Republic v Commission

41

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN