alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**ANSWERS
      CORPORATION**


**FORM 10-Q
      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I
      am the
      Chief Executive Officer of Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2007
            
            /s/
                ROBERT S. ROSENSCHEINRobert
                S. RosenscheinChief
                Executive Officer
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cassandra Stubbs, Attorney at Law, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, David Weiss, Attorney at Law, Brian W. Stull, Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Attorney at Law, Alex T. Haskell, Attorney at Law, For Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

*388The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to admit W. Kerrel Murray Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

1 Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 1996).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60630 Summary Calendar

YAW AYIM OWUSU, Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No. A29 307 869)

June 12, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### Yaw Ayim Owusu petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals

decision affirming the denial of his applica tion for asylum. Our review of the

record and the briefs persuades that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial

evidence. 1 

### The petition for review is therefore DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Valley Bank (“Bank”) is a subsidiary of the registrant, Valley Financial Corporation.  Valley Financial Corporation owns 100% of the Common Stock of the Bank.  Valley Financial Corporation also owns 100% of Valley Financial (VA) Statutory Trust I, Valley Financial (VA) Statutory Trust II, and Valley Financial Statutory Trust III.  VB Investments, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank.  Valley Wealth Management Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank.  VB Land, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. Each of the above entities was incorporated or organized in Virginia.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Griffin, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 829]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered April 14, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s speedy trial motion was properly denied. Upon a review of the minutes of the relevant adjournments, we find that the time chargeable to the People is well within the statutory maximum of 181 days *(see, People v Notholt,*242 AD2d 251, 253).

The challenged portions of the prosecutor’s summation were generally responsive to the defense summation and fair comment on the evidence *(see, People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, *lv denied*91 NY2d 976). There was nothing in the prosecutor’s summation or in her comments made in the course of objecting to defendant’s summation that was so egregious that would warrant reversal, particularly in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, which featured the recovery of prerecorded buy money from defendant’s person *(see, People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6658
MAURICE WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. BALLDOWN; L. SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-137-3) Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 6, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice White, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Maurice White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Balldown , No. CA-05-137-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 MATERIAL TERMS OF PETER HUGHES EMPLOYMENT
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 23, 2006
 
    
    Hired as the Companys Chief Operating Officer effective January 23, 2006.
    
    Annual salary of $250,000.
    
    Eligible for a performance-based $50,000 annual bonus.
    
    Hired as an at-will employee. If terminated without cause, eligible for a one-time payment equal to six months of base salary.
    
    Was granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Companys common stock, at
an exercise price equal to the common stocks market price on the date of grant of $6.20. The option vests in equal installments over a five year period,
beginning on the first anniversary of the January 23, 2006 grant date and continuing on each subsequent anniversary date until fully vested.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lori Stoin FREEMAN

No. COA17-751

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
STATE v. John Lewis WRAY, Jr.

382P10-8

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

John L. Wray, Jr., For Wray, John Lewis, Jr.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of November 2017 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Beasley, J. recused
1 Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7435

RAYMOND PERACCINY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-05-37-5) Submitted: April 17, 2006 Decided: May 16, 2006 Before LUTTIG, 1MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Peracciny, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. R enfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 We decline to address Peracciny’s challenge to the constitutionality of the Bureau of Prisons’ organ transplant policy, which was not squarely raised in the district court and, in any event, is not cognizable under § 2241. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Raymond Peracciny, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 2 See Peracciny v. Stansberry , No. CA-05-37-5 (E.D.N.C. June 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | May                11, 2007                                            |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3818 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3818

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
              with respect to lighting energy efficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2014

 Mr. Duncan of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
              with respect to lighting energy efficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Thomas Edison BULB Act''.

SEC. 2. LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of title III of the Energy Independence 
and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-140) is repealed.
    (b) Application.--The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6201 et seq.) shall be applied and administered as if subtitle B of 
title III of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (and the 
amendments made by that subtitle) had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

D.K.D., 

 Respondent 

 v. 

A.L.C., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 330 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Jamie E. PRINCE, Widow of Mark Randall Prince, Sr., Deceased Employee, Plaintiff, v. UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Employer, Allied Eastern Indemnity Company, Carrier (Eastern Alliance Insurance Group, Third-Party Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA17-1195

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4651 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, as the ``Specialist Keith 
                Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST KEITH ERIN GRACE, JR. MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, shall be known as the 
``Specialist Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referenced 
to subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, as the ``Specialist Keith 
                Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eon. J. Franlclin Spears 

Chainnan, Subcomodttee on Finance, 

The senate, 

Auatln# Texae 

Ino. T* 'Ehe State 

ulBct+ dtb 8 

proprlatlon of 

Texas, in maTlah to state tbirt, 

eaolutlon To. a$ em 

brlitglng Of #la 

za3* whlehTa8ap8.napnrsrugt~ 

agalmt the ,lEsts 

Frtmkllu Brethers et sl Trn. sbmaara 

may et al, M f&own lm 783 8). T* (2) m& 

ti February 0, 193sr the Snpreme Conrt of m oftier haing granted a rrlt of error in rmeh came8 aimlamed sape 

on the ground that the zkppllsation for n-&t sf emor ai& 

not set out that a motion for rabeaFing ha4 been flled in 

the Court Of Cirfl ~eakd. The ranate tae lal3ued from 

theCourtof Clrll Appeals to tbe?&triot Colvtof Wavis 

County 011 rfeoaaber 10, 393s 
Eon. J. Frsnldln Spears, Uarch m, l@20, Page 2 

It is the opinion Of this department that the 

judgment I.8 final and that the Legislature, if it 80 desires, may appropriate swffioient money fo pay off such 

lunea-*- 

very truly yours
OFFICERS" CERTIFICATE


To: i) Bank One, National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely
as Eligible Lender Trustee, ii) Bankers Trust Company, New York, N.Y., Indenture
Trustee,  In accordance  with Section 3.08 of the Servicing  Agreement among SMS
Student Loan Trust 2000-A, as Issuer, USA Servicing  Corporation  formerly known
as USA Group Loan Services, Inc., as Servicer ("Servicer"),  USA Group Secondary
Market Services, Inc., as Seller, and Bank One, National Association, not in its
individual  capacity but solely as Eligible Lender Trustee,  dated as of January
1, 2000 ("Servicing Agreement"),  the undersigned,  in their official capacities
as Authorized Officers of Servicer, hereby certify as follows:

a) a review of the  activities  of  Servicer  during the period from the Closing
Date to  September  30,  2000 and of its  performance  has been made  under such
officers" supervision, and

b) to the best of such officers" knowledge, based on
such review,  Servicer has  fulfilled  all its  obligations  under the Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings ascribed to them
in the  Servicing  Agreement.  In witness  whereof,  USA  Servicing  Corporation
formerly  known as USA  Group  Loan  Services,  Inc.,  has  caused  this  Annual
Statement as to Compliance to be duly executed as of September 30, 2000.


USA Servicing Corporation formerly known as USA GROUP LOAN SERVICES, INC.


by /s/ Laurie S. Blackburn
Laurie S. Blackburn, Vice President



by /s/ Daniel L. Yost
Daniel L. Yost, Senior Vice President


cc: USA Group Secondary Market Services, Inc.
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua Tim COLESON, Defendant.

No. COA17-1304

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 17, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rodolfo Prieto and Robert Schaffhauser, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                    
|/s/ Rodolfo Prieto                                  
|Rodolfo Prieto Chief Executive
Officer June 28, 2004
#### Mike SMITH, Relator, v. QUEBECOR PRINTING, INC., and Kemper National Insurance Companies, Respondents, and Minneapolis Orthopedic and Arthritis Institute, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Midas Recovery (Standard Insurance), MN Department of Labor & Industry/VRU, MN Department of Human Services, and Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Intervenors.

No. A03-291.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Aug. 15, 2003.

Brian Thomas Mak, St. Paul, for relator.

E.C. Michael Forde, Aafedt, Forde, Gray & Monson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 19, 2003, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.

*See*Minn. R. CivApp. P. 136.01.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00376-CV 

RUEBEN MENDOZA APPELLANT

V.

FORT WORTH HOUSING 

AUTHORITY AND AMERITEX 

SECURITY

APPELLEES 

----------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 352-259031-12

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

After pro se appellant Rueben Mendoza failed to file his brief, we notified 

him that if he did not file a response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file 

a brief, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 38.8(a)(1). Mendoza filed a response, but it did not set out a reasonable 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

explanation for his failure to file a brief, and Appellee Fort Worth Housing 

Authority (FWHA) filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based on Mendoza’s 

failure to file his brief and his failure to state a reasonable explanation for his 

failure to file his brief. Mendoza filed a response to FWHA’s motion, in which he 

stated that because of his health issues, he was “being forced to step back, 

heal[,] and regenerate . . . and leave this case unfinished.” Therefore, we grant 

FWHA’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 20, 2014
James Abner MILLER and wife, Mary S. Miller, Manning P. Cooke, Jr., and wife, Linda B. Cooke, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Michael S. COOKE and wife, Anne S. Cooke, Respondents-Appellants.

No. COA17-949

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

DISMISSED.
In the Matter of the Foreclosure of SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE SERVICES, Petitioner, v. Neil McArthur BYRD, Respondent.

No. COA17-1150

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 13.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Telefônica Brasil S.A.  (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gilmar Roberto Pereira Camurra, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.









Date: April 20, 2012By:
/s/ Gilmar Roberto Pereira CamurraName:
Gilmar Roberto Pereira CamurraTitle:
Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer