alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee (MPSAC), #66.                    

*Date/Time:*                         November 2, 2005 12 Noon-6 p.m.; November 3, 2005 8 a.m.-6 p.m.; November 4, 2005 8 a.m.-3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1235.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005. National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*                         Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate, Update on current status of Directorate, Meeting with Education and Human Resources Advisory Committee, Update on High Magnetic Field Subcommittee, Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate, Report on                               ( print page 58758)                            NSF/MPS CyberScience Activities, Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Activities.                    

*Summary Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

Dated: October 4, 2005.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20273  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### In the Matter of William Jayquan R., IV, a Child Alleged to be Abandoned. William R., Appellant; St. Christopher’s Inc./Jennie Clarkson Child Care Services, Inc., Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 852]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 14, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a fact-finding determination of abandonment, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding that respondent father had abandoned the subject child, as set forth in Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (b) and (5) (b), is supported by clear and convincing evidence, namely, the testimony of the child’s caseworker and respondent father’s brother and sister that respondent had only brief, insubstantial contacts with the child, and no contacts at all with the agency, for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition *(see, Matter of Female W.,*271 AD2d 210). Family Court’s determination that respondent’s testimony concerning his contacts with the child was not credible has ample basis in the record and should not be disturbed on appeal *(see, Matter of Jamieka G.,*276 AD2d 288; *Matter of Jose Ramon V.,*264 AD2d 661). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Andrias, Wallach, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4651 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national monuments 

in Utah except by express authorization of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself and Mr. CHAFFETZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 

monuments in Utah except by express authorization of 

Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ES4 TABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN 

5 UTAH. 

6 This proviso of the last sentence of the first section 

7 of the Act of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 

8 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is amended by inserting ‘‘or Utah’’ 

9 after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.4

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P., hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.

Date: February 26, 2010



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# SUMMARY:

The Foundation modified a permit to conduct activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541; Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 670).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Polly A. Penhale, Environmental Officer, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                              ( print page 5707)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 21, 1999, the National Science Foundation issued a five-year permit (ACA #2000-001) to Dr. Steven D. Emslie after posting a notice in the August 17, 1999                     **Federal Register**                    . Public comments were not received. A request to modify the permit was posted in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 20, 2004. No public comments were received. The modification was issued by the Foundation on January 19, 2005.                

Polly A. Penhale,

Environmental Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-2011  Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Irving BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-2986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 2003.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Robinson v. State,*373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).

FARMER, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter WCM
L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President of
Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 9, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Thomas STACKS

No. COA17-770

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
#### Tony Lee NIX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2152.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 22, 2003.

Tony Lee Nix, Sneads, pro se.

*231No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Sampson v. State,*832 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Robert K. STEWART

274P15-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Robert K. Stewart, for Stewart, Robert K.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Maureen Krueger, District Attorney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of June 2018 by Defendant for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of July 2018 by North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Novis Chambers, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 849]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered November 24, 1997, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of IV3 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

*354Upon our review of the factors set forth in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442), we find that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Specifically, we note that the People established a reasonable explanar tion for the delay and that defendant did not establish any prejudice.

The court’s denial of defendant’s request for new counsel, made at the start of trial, was a proper exercise of discretion *(see, People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822). Defendant, who received a sufficient opportunity to voice his complaints about his attorney, did not establish good cause for substitution.

Defendant’s sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence was sufficient to establish the elements of bail jumping in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Antorio Maurice SMARR

No. 579P01-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Antorio Rice Smarr, for Smarr, Antorio Maurice

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Gaston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of July 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward SMITH, Jr.

No. COA17-925

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
#### James Edward BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D02-3244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 30, 2003.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s revocation of probation and the sentence imposed upon James Edward Bell for violating his probation. However, we remand the cause for entry of a written order providing the specific reasons for concluding Bell violated his probation, as both the State and the Public Defender agree that no such written order appears in the record. *See Cifuentes v. State,*717 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed, but remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

HOMEBANC CORP.

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with HomeBanc Corp.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Patrick
S. Flood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick S. Flood                
|                   |  |     |  | Patrick S. Flood                    
|                   |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Zachary SPENCER.

No. 2001-KO-944.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 27, 2003.

In re Spencer, Zachary- — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or -Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District court Div. G, Nos. 393-876; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-KA-2127.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., concurs and assigns reasons.

JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ.

| T CALOGERO, Chief Justice,

concurs in the denial of the writ application and assigns the following reasons.

In this application, the state has a somewhat stronger case than it did in *State v. Sylvia,*01-1406 (La.4/9/03), 845 So.2d 358. In addition to the lab test confirming the existence of cocaine residue in the “crack pipe,” as was the case in *Sylvia,*the court of appeal in this case found, in accordance with the arresting officer’s testimony, that residue was also visible to the naked eye. In all events, this court’s majority is apparently not willing reconsider the resolved issue in *Sylvia.*I therefore concur in the denial of the writ application. But, see my general views in these drug residue *989cases, as expressed in my dissent in *Sylvia.*
STATE of North Carolina v. Gary Michael PRINCE, Jr.

No. 85P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Gary Michael Prince, Jr., for Prince, Gary Michael Jr.

*166***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th of March 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 01 69 -C R

______________________________ RI CHARD L EONAR WHYTUS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 196th J udicial District Court

Hunt County , Texas Trial Court No. 23,584

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Me mor and

um O pin ion

by Chi e f Jus tic e Mo rr issWhy tus appea ls from seven c onvictions, all for ag g ravated assault with a de adly wea pon, 1 cause numbers 06-08- 00167-CR through 06- 08-00173-CR.
2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Richard L eonar

Why tus a ppeals from his c onviction by a jury on seven c harg es of a g g ravated assault wit h a deadly

wea pon. See T EX . P EN A L C ODE ANN . § 22.20(a) (2) ( Ver non Supp. 2008). The 1 evidenc e shows that, while quite intoxi cate d, he drove his car into a daycar e full of nappingchildren. Two worke rs and se vera l of the childre n wer e injured. Why tus has filed a sing le brief , in which he r aises a sing le issue which is common t o all of his a pp e a ls. He argues that

the tr ia l c ourt

c omm itt e d r e ve rs ibl e e rr or by re fu sin g to s ub mit

his
r e qu e s t e d c h ar g e o nt h e l e s s e r - i n c l u d e d o f f e n s e o f a s s a u l tc a u s i n g b o d i l y i n

j u r y. We ad dr e sse d th i s i s s u e i nd e t a i l i no ur o p i n i o no f

t h i s d a t e o nW h y

tu s ' a p p e a l i nc a

u se number 06-08- 00167-CR. For th e re asons stated ther ein, we likew ise conc lude that er ror ha s not been shown in this case. We affir m the judgme nt.

J o s hR
. M o r r i s s , III Chief J ustice Date Submitted: Fe bruar y 26, 2009 Date D ecide d: Fe bruar y 27, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


FOR


GOLD RIDGE RESOURCES, INC.







COMMON STOCK ($.01 PER SHARE)







Persons interested in purchasing common stock of Gold Ridge Resources, Inc. must complete and return this Subscription Agreement along with their check, money order or bank draft payable to: Gold Ridge Resources, Inc. ("the Issuer" and "the Company").







Subject only to acceptance hereof by the Issuer, in its discretion, the undersigned hereby subscribes for the number of common shares and at the aggregate subscription price set forth below.







An accepted copy of this Agreement will be returned to the Subscriber as a receipt, and the physical stock certificate will be delivered to each Investor within thirty (30) days of the Close of this Offering.







      SECURITIES OFFERED - The Company is offering a total of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock (par value $.001 per share) at a price of $.01 per share. There is no minimum subscription amount. 







     SUBSCRIPTION - In connection with this subscription the undersigned hereby subscribes to the number of common shares shown in the following table.







NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES = _________________







Multiply by Price of Shares x $.01 per Share







Aggregate Subscription Price = $_________________







Check or money order shall be made payable to Gold Ridge Resources, Inc.







In connection with this investment in the Company, I represent and warrant as follows:







a)   Prior to tendering payment for the shares, I received a copy of and read your prospectus dated ______________, 201___.







b)   I am a bona fide resident of the state of _____________________________ or     ______ a non-US resident.












Please register the Shares, which I am purchasing in the following name(s):







_______________________________________________________







As (check one)








	
__Individual

	
__Tenants in Common

	
__Existing Partnership


	
__Joint Tenants

	
__Corporation

	
__Trust


	
__IRA

	
__Minor with adult custodian under

	  
	
 

	
the Uniform Gift to Minors Act

	  





 




  





  











  






 


For the person(s) who will be registered shareholder(s):













	
 

	 	
 


	
Signature of Subscriber

	 	
Signature of Co-Subscriber


	  	 	  
	
 

	 	
 


	
Name of Subscriber (Printed)

	 	
Name of Co-Subscriber (Printed)


	  	 	  
	
 

	 	
 


	
Address

	 	
Address of Co-Subscriber


	  	 	  
	
 

	 	
 


	
Address

	 	
Address of Co-Subscriber

















ACCEPTED BY: Gold Ridge Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation


















	
By:

	
 

	  
	  	
Officer


	  	  	  
	
Date:

	
 

	  





 


 


2