alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 451 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 451

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, Florida, as the ``Richard 
                        K. Salick Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD K. SALICK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Richard K. Salick Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard K. 
Salick Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 451

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, Florida, as the ``Richard 
                        K. Salick Post Office''.
```
David S. FIFE, Employee, Plaintiff, v. ETERNAL WOODWORKS, LLC., Employer, and Erie Insurance, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA17-645

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 3, 2018

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 99/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.099.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 99 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5413 April 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.099.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 99

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5413 April 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/229/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 4 April 2011 concerning the technical specifications of interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock – noise’ of the trans-European conventional rail system
  (notified under document C(2011) 658)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2011/229/EU

*

Commission Decision of 4 April 2011 concerning the technical specifications of interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock – noise’ of the trans-European conventional rail system
  (notified under document C(2011) 658)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 658)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 303/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.303.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 303 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5531 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.303.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 303

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5531 October 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 979/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 relating to temporary Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal | 83 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008

1

*

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 979/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 relating to temporary Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal

83

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. Patrick Eugene THOMAS

No. COA17-904

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Jamie Young, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Inmate Special Housing Unit, et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 313]

Lahtinen, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Petitioner challenges the determination claiming that a number of procedural errors require its annulment.*

Initially, we reject petitioner’s argument that the hearing was untimely commenced. The record indicates that the hearing was originally commenced within seven days of petitioner’s *673confinement as required by 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 (a). The hearing was then adjourned and, due to the transfer of the Hearing Officer who commenced the hearing, two extensions were authorized to permit reassignment of a Hearing Officer to conduct a new hearing. The hearing recommenced on the 13th day of confinement and was concluded within the applicable time limitation on the 14th day following the issuance of the misbehavior report (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]). Inasmuch as the delay in recommencement “was authorized and reasonable and resulted in no prejudice to petitioner, there is no basis to annul a determination of guilt” *(Matter of Barrett v Senkowski,*180 AD2d 977, 978; *see, Matter of Torres v Goord,*264 AD2d 871).

Petitioner’s claim that he received ineffective employee assistance because his assistant failed to provide him with certain documents is similarly without merit, as the record indicates that petitioner received all the relevant documents to which he was entitled *(see,*7 NYCRR 1020.5; *see also, Matter of Madison v Goord,*273 AD2d 557).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and, to the extent preserved for our review, found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 Supreme Court improperly transferred the proceeding on substantial evidence grounds inasmuch as petitioner raises solely procedural issues in the petition (see, *Matter of Barnhill v Coombe,*239 AD2d 719, 720, n). Nevertheless, we shall retain jurisdiction and review the merits in the interest of judicial economy (see, *Matter of Nieves v Goord,*262 AD2d 1042).
EX10-31FirstAmendXSIP




Exhibit 10.31
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE POST HOLDINGS, INC. EXECUTIVE SAVINGS INVESTMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, Post Holdings, Inc. previously adopted the Post Holdings, Inc. Executive Savings Investment Plan (“Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended pursuant to Article VIII of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to make certain clarifying changes under the Plan; 
NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 29, 2013, the Plan is amended as follows: 
1.    Section 3.5(c) is amended to read as follows: 
(c)  Change in Control.  Upon a Change in Control, all amounts deemed to be invested in the Post Holdings, Inc. Common Stock Fund shall be immediately converted to a Fund that is a target retirement fund.
2.    Section 4.1 is amended to replace the first sentence thereof with the following:
The rate at which earnings and losses shall be credited to a Participant’s Account shall be determined in accordance with one or more Funds selected by the Participant; if a Participant does not select a Fund, the Fund applicable for that Participant shall be the Fund that is a target retirement fund.  
3.    Section 4.1 is amended to add the following to the end thereof:
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that the Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. stock Fund is removed, a Fund selected by the Employee Benefit Trustees Committee as a target retirement fund shall apply in its place until the Participant elects a replacement Fund in accordance with such procedures as may be required under the terms of the Plan and as otherwise may be determined by the Committee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 29 day of January, 2013.
	
			
	POST HOLDINGS, INC.
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ William P. Stiritz
	 

	William P. Stiritz
	 

	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.02**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

ECB Bancorp, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement(No. 333-77689) of ECB Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 relating to the ECB Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan, of our report dated March 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of ECB Bancorp, Inc. andsubsidiary as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2005,annual report on Form 10-K of ECB Bancorp, Inc. 

 

*/s/ KPMG LLP*

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 3, 2006
Exhibit 21



List of Subsidiaries of PSS World Medical, Inc.



|                                              |  |                    |  |                                                 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Name of Domestic Subsidiary                   |  | State of Formation |  | (Names under which Subsidiary conducts
business)
|Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc.               |  | Delaware           |  |                                                 
|Physician Sales & Service, Inc.               |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|Physician Sales & Service Limited Partnership |  | Texas              |  |                                                 
|PSS Holding, Inc.                             |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|PSS Service, Inc.                             |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|ThriftyMed, Inc.                              |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|WorldMed Shared Services, Inc.                |  | Florida            |  | PSS World Medical Shared Services, Inc.         
|Proclaim, Inc.                                |  | Tennessee          |  |                                                 
|Ancillary Management Solutions, Inc.          |  | Tennessee          |  |                                                 
|Highpoint Healthcare Distribution, Inc.       |  | Nevada             |  |
#### Todd Vincent HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-5565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 8, 2003.

*902S. Grant Halliday, Tampa, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deena DeGenova, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Todd Howard raises numerous challenges to his convictions and sentences for armed burglary of a residence, grand theft of a firearm, and grand theft. We find merit only in his contention that he cannot be sentenced to consecutive terms as a habitual offender for crimes arising out of the same incident. We affirm all his other points on appeal without comment.

No one disputes that Howard’s three crimes all occurred in the same criminal episode. The court sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment as a habitual offender for each of his convictions. It suspended the sentences after Howard serves forty-eight months in prison and placed him on community control for two years, followed by four years’ probation. The written sentencing documents state that the three sentences of ten years’ imprisonment are to be served consecutively, while the community control and probation portions of the sentences are to run concurrently.

The State points out that the court’s oral pronouncement of sentence appears to indicate that incarcerative portions of the sentences were also to be served concurrently. Although the transcript is not entirely clear, it may be that the written sentences do not conform to the oral pronouncement and must be corrected. *See Hunter v. State,*846 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). But even if the court orally announced consecutive sentences, they cannot stand. A court may not sentence a defendant to consecutive terms as a habitual offender for crimes that arose out of a single criminal episode. *Hale v. State,*630 So.2d 521, 524-25 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we reverse Howard’s sentences and remand with instructions for the court either to correct the written sentencing documents to reflect the orally announced sentences or, if the written documents comport with the court’s oral pronouncement, to resentence him to concurrent terms of ten years’ imprisonment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




ANSWERS
CORPORATION




FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I am the
Chief Financial Officer of Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.












Date:
      November 9, 2009/s/
      Steven SteinbergSteven
      SteinbergChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
STATE v. Henry Ford ADKINS

55P02-14

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Henry Ford Adkins, for Adkins, Henry Ford

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Craig Blitzer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*283The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of September 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
Kornegay Family Farms, LLC, et al. v. Cross Creek Seed, Inc.

187PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2016

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Steven B. Epstein, Attorney at Law, Caitlin Goforth, Attorney at Law, Saad Gul, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cross Creek Seed, Inc.

L. Neal Ellis, Jr., Attorney at Law, Wake Forest, J. P. Williamson, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Kornegay Family Farms, LLC, et al.

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

Jon Ward, Attorney at Law, Michael W. Patrick, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Phillip Jacob Parker, Jr., Attorney at Law, H. Julian Philpott, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Farm Bureau Federation, Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of December 2016 by NC Farm Bureau Federation, Inc., Tobacco Growers Association of NC, Inc., NC Soy Bean Producers Association, NC Peanut Growers Association, and Carolines Cotton Growers Cooperative, Inc. for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
EXHIBIT 32.2
  
    (1)
    
    The report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2009 (the ''Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods presented in the Report.
 /s/ SIMON A. BORROWSSimon A. BorrowsCo-Chief Executive Officer
BANYAN GW, LLC v. WAYNE PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. and its Board of Directors; Sharon Thompson, Chair of the Board of Directors; and John Ankeney, and Lucius J. Stanley, as members of the Board of Directors, and Vertex III, LLC

No. 188P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 25, 2018

Glenn A. Barfield, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, for Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School, Inc.

W. Lewis Glenn, III, Attorney at Law, for Vertex III, LLC.

J. Mitchell Armbruster, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Banyan GW, LLC.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2018 by Defendant (Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School, Inc.) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of June 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School, Inc.) on the 20th of June 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of June 2018."
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4323 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith 

Act of 2004, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4323 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Reau3 thorization Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination 

6 Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(3)— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

9 ‘‘2010 through 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2014 

10 through 2019’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

12 ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘2009 through 

14 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 2019’’. 

15 SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION. 

16 Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice 

17 Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking 

18 ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 

19 2019’’. 

20 SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS. 

21 Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice 

22 Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4323 RDS 

1 ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 

2 2019’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michael Dennis LONG v. STATE of North Carolina, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al.

No. 419P12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 2, 2018

Jodi Harrison, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Michael Dennis Long, for Long, Michael Dennis.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 2nd of April 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Catawba County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of April 2018."
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**HOMEBANC CORP.**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with HomeBanc Corp.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Kevin D. Race, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|               |   |                                                             |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/ KEVIN D. RACE                                                |
|               |   | Kevin D. Race                                                    |
|               |   | *President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer* |
STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Alberto Beiza TAPIA

No. COA17-471

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.