alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A pr i l 13, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 15771 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 0 2 1 - CR- 4 - RH - W CS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f- A p p e lle e , v ersu s J E R E M Y L E A L , a .k .a . J e s s e y L e a l, D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t ates D i stri ctC ou rt forthe N orthe rn D i s tri c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A p r i l13, 2006) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an d F A Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

C hetK aufm an, appo i nt ed coun se lfor J er em y L ea l , has m ov ed t o w i thd ra w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a ti on of L e a l , be c aus e , i n hi s opi ni on, the appe a li s w i thout m e r i t . C ouns e lha s f

i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i for ni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). Independ entre vi ew of the enti re re cord r e v e a ls th a t c o u n s e l’s a s s e s s m e n t o f th e r e la tiv e m e rit o f

th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c aus e i nde pe nde nte xa m i na ti on of the e nti r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no ar guabl e i s s ue s of m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o ti o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd L e a l ’ s c onvi c ti on a nd se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
Hunter F. GRODNER, Plaintiff, v. Andrzej GRODNER, Defendant.

No. COA17-570 No. COA17-813

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
STATE of North Carolina v. Terrill Jaronn LAMPKINS.

No. COA15-1009.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part; Dismissed in part.
Claire AMELIO and Antonio Amelio, Plaintiffs, v. REAL ESTATE BY DESIGN, LLC, Home by Design, LLC, Lisa Lynn Ellis, Colleen Bennett Ellis, Stephen Gregory Ellis, Defendants.

No. COA17-724

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 57523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19623]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[REG-108524-00]
RIN 1545-BD80


Section 1446 Regulations; Withholding on Effectively-Connected 
Taxable Income Allocable to Foreign Partners; Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Change of date of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document changes the date of a public hearing on proposed 
regulations relating to the circumstances under which a partnership may 
take partner-level deductions and losses into account in computing its 
withholding tax obligation with respect to a foreign partner's 
allocable share of effectively connected taxable income.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Monday, October 3, 
2005, at 10 a.m. is rescheduled for Wednesday, November 16, 2005, at 10 
a.m. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing were due 
by September 12, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing is being held in the IRS auditorium, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security 
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Hurst, (202) 622-7180 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Wednesday, May 
18, 2005 (70 FR 28743), announced that a public hearing on proposed 
regulations relating to circumstances under which a partnership may 
take partner-level deductions and losses into account in computing its 
withholding tax obligation with respect to a foreign partner's 
allocable share of effectively connected taxable income would be held 
on Monday, October 3, 2005, beginning at 10 a.m. in the IRS auditorium, 
1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
    The date of the hearing has changed. The hearing is scheduled for 
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, beginning at 10 a.m. in the IRS 
auditorium, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Because of 
the controlled access restrictions, attendants will not be admitted 
beyond the lobby area of the Internal Revenue Building until 9:30 a.m. 
The IRS will prepare an agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers 
after the outlines are received from the persons testifying and make 
copies available free of charge at the hearing.

Cynthia Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 05-19623 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TORREY-TYREE LEWIS,

Appellant

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY 

FSB, ET, AL.,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MAP 2023

Appeal from the Order of the 

Chester County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. 2023-04719-MJ dated 

July 11, 2023.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2023, as this Court lacks jurisdiction over 

this appeal, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 722 (listing instances where this Court has exclusive 

appellate jurisdiction over final orders of the courts of common pleas), and the appeal 

falls within the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Superior Court, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 

742, the matter is TRANSFERRED to the Superior Court. See Pa.R.A.P. 751.
IN RE: A.P.

145PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 12, 2018

Anne C. Wright, Attorney at Law, Boone, for Powell, Kylah

Christopher C. Peace, Attorney at Law, Keith T. Roberson, Attorney at Law, for Mecklenburg County DSS

Matthew Wunsche, Attorney at Law, Durham, for GAL

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of September 2018 by Guardian ad Litem for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of September 2018."
March 31, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROSEMARY TOOKER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00124

- CV V.

ALIEF INDEPENDENT SC HOOL DISTRICT , Appel lee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on January 7, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We furth er order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Rosemary Tooker.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Argued and submitted February 27,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration April 3, 2003

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Joseph Martinez, Claimant. Joseph MARTINEZ, *Petitioner, v.*TRI-MET, INC., *Respondent.*

00-05126; A115924

66 P3d 591

Dennis O’Malley argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Travis L. Terrall argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Kistler and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of *SAIF v. Lewis,*335 Or 92, 58 P3d 814 (2002).
#### Roderick E. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 12, 2003.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Miller v. State,*764 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4389 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2014 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been 

unlawfully present in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection for 

5 American Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN WORK AUTHORIZA7 TIONS. 

8 Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4389 IH

1 from granting a work authorization to an alien who has 

2 been finally determined, in a valid immigration proceeding 

3 during which due process was afforded, to have been at 

4 any time unlawfully present in the United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21
                              Subsidiaries of State of Franklin Bancshares, Inc.



     State of Franklin  Savings Bank, a  Tennessee-chartered  savings bank, is a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of State of Franklin  Bancshares,  Inc., as is State of
Franklin  Leasing  Corporation,  a  Tennessee  corporation.  John  Sevier  Title
Services,  Inc., a Tennessee corporation,  is a wholly owned subsidiary of State
of Franklin  Savings  Bank.  State of Franklin  Real  Estate,  Inc., a Tennessee
corporation,  is a wholly owned  subsidiary  of State of Franklin  Savings Bank.
State of Franklin Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut business trust, is a business
trust subsidiary of State of Franklin Bancshares, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7976-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of cost recovery settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under section 122(h) (1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency has offered a cost recovery settlement at the Ward Transformer Superfund Site (Site) located in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. EPA will consider public comments until October 31, 2005. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicated the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, Email:                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.gov.*

Written or email comments may be submitted to Paula V. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: September 15, 2005. 

Rosalind H. Brown, 

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-19494 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Kurt Allen COREY, Defendant.

No. COA17-1031

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED IN PART. AFFIRMED IN PART.
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 9, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Seoul, South Korea, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Paul F. Khoury, Robert L. Walker, Madeline J. Cohen, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Washington, DC, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

*859The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 9th of August 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of August 2018."
(109 So. 391)

No. 27554.

#### PICKENS v. DELLINGER et al.

(May 31, 1926.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Taxation <&wkey;805(!) — Three-year prescription held to bar attack on tax sale, where tax debtors were not in possession and there was no dual assessment or'prior payment of taxes.

Constitutional prescription of three years *held*to bar attack on tax sale, though owner claiming under s-ueh sale was never in possession, where tax debtors were not in possession and there was no dual assessment or prior payment of taxes.

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; F. X. Ransdell, Judge.

Petitory action for a tract of land by Samuel B. Pickens against Mrs. Catherine Del-linger and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Lewell C. Butler, of Shreveport, for appellants.

Herndon & Herndon, of Shreveport, for appellee.

*695ROGERS, X

This is a petitory action for a tract of land, in the parish of Oaddo — the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 20, township 17 north, range 14 west. The court below maintained the action, and defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff claims under the following muniments of title, viz.: United States to James Marks (patent); James Marks to Thomas Simpson (deed); Thomas Simpson to Thomas D. Gary (exchange); heirs of Thomas D. Gary to Samuel N. Pickens (tax sale); Samuel N. Pickens to Mary J. Pickens, his wife, and Samuel B. Pickens, his son (will and inheritance) ; Mary X Pickens to Samuel B. Pick-ens (deed).

Defendants, in their answer, alleged their possession as owners, and pleaded the prescription of 30 years in bar of plaintiff’s action. They also averred the nullity of the tax sale to Samuel N. Pickens, on the ground that no notice of tax delinquency had been delivered or sent to the owner of record of the property. As against defendants’ attack on the tax sale, plaintiff set up the constitutional prescription of three years.

Our conclusion is that plaintiff’s title to the property in controversy is valid. Defendants’ plea of prescription was not sustained by the evidence. Their attack on the legality of the tax sale cannot be considered, because it is barred by the prescription invoked by plaintiff.'

Defendants argue that, since plaintiff was never in possession, he cannot successfully interpose the plea. The argument is not sound. Under our jurisprudence, it is only when the tax debtor is in actual corporeal possession of the-property, or in cases of dual assessment or, prior- payment of the ta^es, that the prescription will not run in favor of the holder of the tax, title. It is applicable in all other eases. Here the tax debtors were not in possession of the property, and they are not before the court contesting the tax title.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment-appealed from is affirmed at the cost of the appellants.
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP-24-0413

________________________________

GLACIER BEAR RETREAT, LLC;

GAIL L. GOODWIN and 

DARRYL C. SLATTENGREN,

Plaintiffs, Counter Defendants, and Appellees, 

 v.

MATT DUSEK; RACHEL DUSEK,

 Defendants, Counter Claimants, and Appellants. 

 __________________________________

ORDER

The Court has been advised that the parties to this matter have settled the 

issues giving rise to the certified question before this Court, and have stipulated to 

the dismissal of this cause with prejudice. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this 

cause is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 

attorney’s fees.

DATED this _____ day of September, 2024.

____________________________

Chief Justice 

 ____________________________

____________________________

09/13/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0413
2

 __________________________________

____________________________

____________________________

____________________________

Justices 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2024
TOWN OF LITTLETON v. LAYNE HEAVY CIVIL, INC., et al.

322P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2018

Patricia P. Shields, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Joshua D. Neighbors, Attorney at Law, Rod Malone, Attorney at Law, Kristopher Gardner, Attorney at Law, Linda Stephens, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Town of Littleton.

Walter E. Brock, Jr., Attorney at Law, Andrew P. Flynt, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Mack Gay Associates, P.A.

Leslie C. Packer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Steven A. Scoggan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Layne Heavy Civil, Inc., et al.

Julia C. Ambrose, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

*736The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of November 2018 by Plaintiff to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2018."
# Official Journal C 253/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5523 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5523 August 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 253/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6687 — Mitsubishi Motors Corporation/Mitsubishi Corporation/Guangzhou Automobile/JV) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 253/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6687 — Mitsubishi Motors Corporation/Mitsubishi Corporation/Guangzhou Automobile/JV) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 253/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2012/C 253/03 | Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems — Average costs of benefits in kind | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 253/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2012/C 253/03

Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems — Average costs of benefits in kind

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 466 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the Commissioner 

of Social Security from publishing the social security numbers of deceased 

individuals in the Death Master File, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the Commissioner of Social Security from publishing the 

social security numbers of deceased individuals in the 

Death Master File, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Death 

5 Master File Privacy Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 466 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PUBLICATION OF SOCIAL SECU2 RITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN THE DEATH 

3 MASTER FILE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(2) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(I)(i) The Commissioner of Social Security may not 

8 publish in the Death Master File (or any other public 

9 database maintained by the Commissioner that contains 

10 information relating to the death of individuals) the social 

11 security account number of any deceased individual. 

12 ‘‘(ii) The Commissioner shall not be compelled to dis13 close the social security account number of any deceased 

14 individual to any member of the public under section 552 

15 of title 5, United States Code. For purposes of such sec16 tion, this clause shall be considered a statute described 

17 in subsection (b)(3)(B) of such section.’’. 

18 (b) INFORMATION SHARING WITH FEDERAL AND

19 STATE AGENCIES.—Section 205(r)(3) of such Act (42 

20 U.S.C. 405(r)(3)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘such in21 formation’’ the following: ‘‘(including information related 

22 to a deceased individual received by the Commissioner 

23 other than as described in paragraph (1))’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 466 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the 

3 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS