alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2
 HOLLY LOGISTIC SERVICES, L.L.C.  PERFORMANCE UNIT AGREEMENT
 
 W I T N E S S E T H :
    Grant
 Distribution Equivalent Rights
 Nature of Award




---



##### 



Performance Measure
 Common Units Payable
 3-Year Total Increase in
    
    Performance Percentage (%) to beDCF/Unit over $12.492
    
    Multiplied by Performance Units$0.000
    
    
    50
    %$1.026
    
    
    100
    %$2.107
    
    
    150
    %
  Early Termination
       2




---



##### 



Definitions
    3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



Payment of Performance Units
 Adjustment in Number of Performance Units
  6




---



##### 



Delivery of Common Units
 Securities Act
 Federal and State Taxes
 Definitions; Copy of Plan
  7




---



##### 



Administration
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Governing Law
 Amendments
 No Liability for Good Faith Determinations
 No Guarantee of Interests
 Nontransferability of Agreement
 Compliance with Section 409A of the Code
  8




---



##### 



HOLLY LOGISTIC SERVICES, L.L.C.By:
    
    NameTitleEmployee
  9
Lillie MCLAURIN, BY AND THROUGh Michelle NEWSOME, the Administratrix of the Lillie McLaurin's Estate, Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL FACILITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC ; and Carolina Health Care Center of Cumberland County, Limited Partnership; and Carolina Rehab Center of Cumberland, Inc., Defendants.

No. COA16-1161

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
SILVER, et al. v. The HALIFAX COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

338A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 27, 2017

Mark Dorosin, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth M. Haddix, Attorney at Law, Pittsboro, Eileen O'Connor, Attorney at Law, Allen Buansi, Attorney at Law, for Silver, LaTonya, et al.

Brent Ducharme, Attorney at Law.

Garris Neil Yarborough, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Glynn Rollins, Attorney at Law, Roanoke Rpds, for The Halifax County Board Of Commissioners.

K. Ricky Watson, Jr., Co-Director of Youth Justice Project.

Peggy Nicholson, Attorney at Law.

Seth Ascher

Jennifer Story

George Hausen, Jr., Legal Aid.

Jennifer W. Marsh, Director of Research.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of November 2017 by Plaintiffs for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of November 2017."
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William M. Pierce, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

Date: May 8, 2007                      /s/ William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       --------------------------
                                       William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

                                      22
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Active Care Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Roundtree, Sean, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Daniel J. Tucker, Esq. (Daniel J. Tucker and Netanel BenChaim of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered June 30, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Active Care Med. Supply Corp., as Assignee of Munoz, Lina M. v American Tr. Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-2178 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 01, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
STATE v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2018

Gretchen Engel, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorneys at Law, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Irving Joyner, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State.

*680The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Robert L. Walker Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2005-4)] 

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board. 

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2005 rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2005 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.185. The fourth quarter 2005 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.572. The fourth quarter 2005 RCAF-5 is 0.548. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 1, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. [Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.] 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available on our Web site                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov*. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-mail or call the Board's contractor, ASAP Document Solutions; 9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail                     *asapdc@verizon.net*; phone (202) 306-4004. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]                 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Decided: September 15, 2005. 

By the Board, Chairman Nober, Vice Chairman Buttrey, and Commissioner Mulvey. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-18943 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Maurice Alexander ROBINSON

No. 152P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

M. Gordan Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Maurice Alexander.

Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

*390Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of eGain**

 

**Communications Corporation**

 

1. eGain Communications Ltd. (UK) 

 

2. eGain Communications Pty Ltd. (Australia) 

 

3. eGain (Cayman) Ltd. (Cayman) 

 

4. Inference Corporation (Delaware) 

 

5. eGain Communications Pvt. Ltd. (India) 

 

6. eGain Communications SrL (Italy) 

 

7. eGain Communications S.A. (France) 

 

8. eGain Japan K.K. (Japan) 

 

9. eGain Communications B.V. (Netherlands) 

 

10. eGain Communications GmbH (Germany) 

 

11. eGain Communications Ltd. (Ireland) 

 

12. eGain Communications Pacific Pte. Ltd (Singapore)
In the MATTER OF: A.M.

No. COA17-1257

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

REVERSED.
Molly L. BATES, Petitioner, v. Eduardo GOMEZJURADO, Respondent.

No. COA16-242-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
#### Mary B. BARRS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Harvey Leroy Bell, deceased, Petitioner, v. Faye TOWNSEND, Respondent.

No. 1D03-2814.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 21, 2003.

S. Austin Peele of Darby, Peele, Bow-doin & Payne, Lake City, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Mary Barrs seeks review of the circuit court’s opinion reversing a decision of the county court. Barrs’s remedy is certiora-ri, rather than appeal, and therefore, we convert the appeal to a certiorari proceeding. *See Haines City Community Development v. Heggs,*658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995). However, because this court’s jurisdiction was not timely invoked, this proceeding is hereby dismissed. *See Miller v. State,*781 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(rejecting petitioner’s argument that the time for invoking the court’s jurisdiction is measured from issuance of the circuit court’s mandate); *Jones v. Cannon,*750 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                             Subsidiaries of eGain
                           Communications Corporation

    1.eGain Communications Ltd. (UK)

    2.eGain Communications Pty Ltd. (Australia)

    3.eGain (Cayman) Ltd. (Cayman)

    4.Inference Corporation (Delaware)

    5.Inference Ltd. (UK)

    6.K-Commerce BV (Holland)

    7.Verix Software (California)

    8.Sitebridge Corporation (Delaware)

    9.Inference Gmbh (in the process of being dissolved) (Germany)

    10.Inductive, (in the process of being dissolved) (French SARL)
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the
Company) for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Gottwald               
|    |  | Thomas E. Gottwald                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | July 30, 2007
#### William J. CONDREN, Appellant, v. Lowry J. BELL, Jr. and Diana Bell, Appellees.

No. 4D02-3533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 2003.

Donna M. Greenspan of Edwards & An-gelí, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jack S. Cox of Jack Schramm Cox, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION*

We grant the appellee’s motion for clarification. The opinion issued on July 30, 2003, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

This is an appeal from a judgment for attorney’s fees and costs entered after a final judgment that enforced a settlement agreement. The appellant raises three issues. We find no error and affirm.

The parties entered into a settlement agreement following a dispute over improvements to an easement running between their respective properties. The trial court entered an order and final judgment enforcing the settlement agreement. This court affirmed. *Condren v. Bell,*814 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

The appellees moved for attorney’s fees and costs in the trial court. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered a final judgment of attorney’s fees and costs, making specific findings on all relevant factors. The court further found that *610“because the award of attorney’s fees and costs is a sanction” it should include those attorney’s fees incurred in determining .the amount of fees to be awarded. The court further awarded fees for the appellee’s expert witness.

Throughout the judgment, the trial court reiterated its intent to sanction the appellant for his conduct. We find no error in the court’s findings concerning the amount of time expended and the reasonable hourly rate. We further find that because the fees awarded for litigating the issue of fees was a sanction and supported by substantial competent evidence, the award does not run afoul of *State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma,*629 So.2d 830 (Fla.1993), or this court’s decisions in *Dawn to Dusk, Inc. v. Hillsboro-Lyons Investors, Ltd.,*801 So.2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), or *Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe,*763 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). *See also Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank v. Sandel,*766 So.2d 302, (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (Farmer, J., concurring).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.07
















CONSENT OF PASCAL SIMARD







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Pascal Simard, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec” completed in March 2012; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Winter 2012 Drilling Program, Lac Gayot property, Québec, Virginia Mines inc. and KGHM International Ltd.” completed in January 2013;




concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi and Lac Gayot properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Ashuanipi property, under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.6.4 Geological Setting; 3.6.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.6.6 Mineralization” and for the Lac Gayot property, under headings “3.8.4 Geological Setting, 3.8.5 Exploration and Drilling, and 3.8.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,













			
	/S/ Pascal Simard

	 
	 

	Name:

Pascal Simard

Geologist in training

	 
	 






May 13, 2013
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William M. Pierce, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

Date: May 6, 2008                      /s/ William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       --------------------------
                                       William M. Pierce, Jr.
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

                                      23
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: March 9, 2006

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                             
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                 
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
#### Abraham Misrock, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Lester Levi, *Defendant in Error.*

Division. B.

Decision Filed February 13, 1928.

*Jennings & Hamilton,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Sawyer, Surreney, Carter & Keen,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Brasil Telecom
Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

|                      |     |                                   
|--------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------
|Dated: March 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Ricardo Knoepfelmacher        
|                      |     |                                   
|                      |     | Name: Ricardo Knoepfelmacher      
|                      |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer    
|                     
|                     
|Dated: March 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Paulo Narcélio Simões Amaral  
|                      |     |                                   
|                      |     | Name: Paulo Narcélio Simões Amaral
|                      |     | Title: Financial Executive Officer

---
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

ECB Bancorp, Inc.

Engelhard, North Carolina 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-77689) on Form S-8 of ECB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated February28, 2006 with respect to the 2005 consolidated financial statements of ECB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary, which report appears in this December 31, 2005, Annual Report on Form 10-K of ECB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary. 

 

*/s/ DIXON HUGHES PLLC*

 

Greenville, North Carolina 

March 3, 2006
EHMANN, et al. v. MEDFLOW, INC., et al.

433A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2017

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Medflow, Inc., et al.

Harold C. Spears, Attorney at Law, Christopher P. Raab, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Ehmann, Eugene K., et al.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of December 2017 by Defendants (Medflow, Inc. and Medflow Holdings, LLC) for Extension of Time to Serve Objections and Amendments to the Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2017."

Jackson, J. recused