# Official Journal L 190/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 190 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6216 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 190

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6216 July 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1205 of 12 July 2019 granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
  (notified under document C(2019) 5180) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1206 of 12 July 2019 amending Part 1 of Annex E to Council Directive 92/65/EEC as regards the animal health certificate for trade in dogs, cats and ferrets
  (notified under document C(2019) 5210)

   (
  1
  ) | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1205 of 12 July 2019 granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
  (notified under document C(2019) 5180)

(notified under document C(2019) 5180)

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1206 of 12 July 2019 amending Part 1 of Annex E to Council Directive 92/65/EEC as regards the animal health certificate for trade in dogs, cats and ferrets
  (notified under document C(2019) 5210)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 5210)

1

11

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

DECISIONS

| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/1205

of 12 July 2019

granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources

(notified under document C(2019) 5180)

(Only the Dutch and the French texts are authentic)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of point 2 of Annex III thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499 (2) Belgium was granted a derogation allowing it to authorise in the region of Flanders, under certain conditions, the land application of up to 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure on parcels cultivated with grassland and maize undersown with grassland, with cut grassland followed by maize and with cut rye followed by maize and up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure on parcels cultivated with winter wheat and triticale followed by a catch crop and with sugar or fodder beets. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499 (2) Belgium was granted a derogation allowing it to authorise in the region of Flanders, under certain conditions, the land application of up to 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure on parcels cultivated with grassland and maize undersown with grassland, with cut grassland followed by maize and with cut rye followed by maize and up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure on parcels cultivated with winter wheat and triticale followed by a catch crop and with sugar or fodder beets.

| (2) | The derogation granted by Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499 concerned approximately 2 870 farmers and 94 280 ha of land and expired on 31 December 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The derogation granted by Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499 concerned approximately 2 870 farmers and 94 280 ha of land and expired on 31 December 2018.

| (3) | On 21 December 2018, Belgium submitted to the Commission a request for a new derogation under the third subparagraph of point 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC with regard to the region of Flanders. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 21 December 2018, Belgium submitted to the Commission a request for a new derogation under the third subparagraph of point 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC with regard to the region of Flanders.

| (4) | The requested derogation concerns the intention of Belgium to allow the land application in Flanders, in specific holdings, of up to 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from grazing livestock manure and treated manure on parcels cultivated with grassland, grassland mixed with clover, maize undersown with grassland and cut grassland or cut rye followed by maize and up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure and treated manure on parcels cultivated with winter wheat or triticale followed by a catch crop and with beet. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The requested derogation concerns the intention of Belgium to allow the land application in Flanders, in specific holdings, of up to 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from grazing livestock manure and treated manure on parcels cultivated with grassland, grassland mixed with clover, maize undersown with grassland and cut grassland or cut rye followed by maize and up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure and treated manure on parcels cultivated with winter wheat or triticale followed by a catch crop and with beet.

| (5) | The information provided by Belgium in the context of the derogation granted by Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499, indicates that the derogation has not led to a deterioration of water quality. The Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of Directive 91/676/EEC for the period 2012 to 2015 (3), shows that in the region of Flanders, around 81 % of the groundwater monitoring stations reported mean nitrate concentrations below 50 mg/l and 63 % of groundwater monitoring stations reported mean nitrate concentrations below 25 mg/l. Monitoring data showed a downward trend in nitrate concentration in groundwater as compared to the previous reporting period (2008 to 2011). For surface water, 95 % of the monitoring stations have reported mean nitrate concentrations below 50 mg/l and 75 % of monitoring stations have reported mean nitrate concentrations below 25 mg/l. The majority of monitoring points in surface waters showed a decreasing trend in nitrate concentrations. In the reporting period 2012 to 2015, around 76 % of rivers were classified as either eutrophic or hypertrophic, which is similar to the previous reporting period (2008 to 2011). |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The information provided by Belgium in the context of the derogation granted by Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499, indicates that the derogation has not led to a deterioration of water quality. The Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of Directive 91/676/EEC for the period 2012 to 2015 (3), shows that in the region of Flanders, around 81 % of the groundwater monitoring stations reported mean nitrate concentrations below 50 mg/l and 63 % of groundwater monitoring stations reported mean nitrate concentrations below 25 mg/l. Monitoring data showed a downward trend in nitrate concentration in groundwater as compared to the previous reporting period (2008 to 2011). For surface water, 95 % of the monitoring stations have reported mean nitrate concentrations below 50 mg/l and 75 % of monitoring stations have reported mean nitrate concentrations below 25 mg/l. The majority of monitoring points in surface waters showed a decreasing trend in nitrate concentrations. In the reporting period 2012 to 2015, around 76 % of rivers were classified as either eutrophic or hypertrophic, which is similar to the previous reporting period (2008 to 2011).

| (6) | More recent data provided by Belgium for the region of Flanders demonstrate that the quality of ground and surface water in Flanders as regards contamination by nitrates did not improve since 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

More recent data provided by Belgium for the region of Flanders demonstrate that the quality of ground and surface water in Flanders as regards contamination by nitrates did not improve since 2015.

| (7) | Flanders intends to reach the following water quality goals over the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022 for all catchment areas. For surface water, a reduction of the average target distance with 4 mg nitrate per litre with an average concentration above the target distance of 20 mg nitrate per litre; for shallow groundwater, which has a slower recovery rate, a global downward trend of at least 3 mg nitrate per litre has to be reached in all catchments that have an average concentration above 50 mg nitrate per litre or between 40 and 50 mg nitrate per litre with increasing trend. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Flanders intends to reach the following water quality goals over the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022 for all catchment areas. For surface water, a reduction of the average target distance with 4 mg nitrate per litre with an average concentration above the target distance of 20 mg nitrate per litre; for shallow groundwater, which has a slower recovery rate, a global downward trend of at least 3 mg nitrate per litre has to be reached in all catchments that have an average concentration above 50 mg nitrate per litre or between 40 and 50 mg nitrate per litre with increasing trend.

| (8) | In order to reach these goals, Flanders has established a reinforced action programme for the period 2019 to 2022. A review of the designation of area types where strengthened measures are in place is envisaged for the end of 2020 based upon the monitoring results of surface water quality during the winters of the years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 and groundwater quality during the years 2018 and 2019. The legislation transposing Directive 91/676/EEC for the region of Flanders, the ‘Decree for the protection of water against pollution by nitrates from agricultural sources’ (4) (the ‘Manure Decree’) has been amended in accordance with the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022 on 24 May 2019 and applies in conjunction with this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In order to reach these goals, Flanders has established a reinforced action programme for the period 2019 to 2022. A review of the designation of area types where strengthened measures are in place is envisaged for the end of 2020 based upon the monitoring results of surface water quality during the winters of the years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 and groundwater quality during the years 2018 and 2019. The legislation transposing Directive 91/676/EEC for the region of Flanders, the ‘Decree for the protection of water against pollution by nitrates from agricultural sources’ (4) (the ‘Manure Decree’) has been amended in accordance with the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022 on 24 May 2019 and applies in conjunction with this Decision.

| (9) | The Manure Decree applies through the whole territory of the region of Flanders. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Manure Decree applies through the whole territory of the region of Flanders.

| (10) | The Manure Decree includes limits for the land application of both nitrogen and phosphorus. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The Manure Decree includes limits for the land application of both nitrogen and phosphorus.

| (11) | Solid fractions resulting from manure treatment should be delivered to authorised installations for recycling, with the aim of reducing odours and other emissions, improving agronomic and hygienic properties, facilitating handling and enhancing recovery of nitrogen and phosphate. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Solid fractions resulting from manure treatment should be delivered to authorised installations for recycling, with the aim of reducing odours and other emissions, improving agronomic and hygienic properties, facilitating handling and enhancing recovery of nitrogen and phosphate.

| (12) | The supporting documents presented by Belgium concerning the region of Flanders show that the proposed amount of nitrogen from livestock manure of respectively 250 and 200 kg per hectare per year is justified on the basis of objective criteria such as long growing seasons and crops with high nitrogen uptake. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The supporting documents presented by Belgium concerning the region of Flanders show that the proposed amount of nitrogen from livestock manure of respectively 250 and 200 kg per hectare per year is justified on the basis of objective criteria such as long growing seasons and crops with high nitrogen uptake.

| (13) | The latest data provided by Belgium for Flanders for the period 2015 to 2017 show a decrease in pig numbers of 4,7 %. The numbers of poultry show an increase of 14,3 % between 2014 and 2017. The numbers of cattle remained stable. In order to avoid that the application of the requested derogation leads to intensification of livestock rearing, the competent authorities will limit the number of livestock that can be kept in each farm (nutrient emission rights) in the region of Flanders according to the provisions set out in the Manure Decree. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The latest data provided by Belgium for Flanders for the period 2015 to 2017 show a decrease in pig numbers of 4,7 %. The numbers of poultry show an increase of 14,3 % between 2014 and 2017. The numbers of cattle remained stable. In order to avoid that the application of the requested derogation leads to intensification of livestock rearing, the competent authorities will limit the number of livestock that can be kept in each farm (nutrient emission rights) in the region of Flanders according to the provisions set out in the Manure Decree.

| (14) | The data reported by Belgium concerning the region of Flanders for the period 2012 to 2015 showed a decrease of 4,9 % in the use of nitrogen from livestock manure in the period 2012 to 2014 as compared to the period 2004 to 2007. The latest available numbers for 2015, 2016 and 2017 show a further decrease in the use of nitrogen from livestock manure of 4,0 % between 2014 and 2017, up to a value of 90,6 thousand tonnes in 2017. During the reporting period 2012 to 2015, the use of mineral nitrogen was similar to the period 2008 to 2011. The latest available data for 2015, 2016 and 2017 show that mineral nitrogen use has increased to 48,6 thousand tonnes in 2017, which is an increase of 21 % compared to 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The data reported by Belgium concerning the region of Flanders for the period 2012 to 2015 showed a decrease of 4,9 % in the use of nitrogen from livestock manure in the period 2012 to 2014 as compared to the period 2004 to 2007. The latest available numbers for 2015, 2016 and 2017 show a further decrease in the use of nitrogen from livestock manure of 4,0 % between 2014 and 2017, up to a value of 90,6 thousand tonnes in 2017. During the reporting period 2012 to 2015, the use of mineral nitrogen was similar to the period 2008 to 2011. The latest available data for 2015, 2016 and 2017 show that mineral nitrogen use has increased to 48,6 thousand tonnes in 2017, which is an increase of 21 % compared to 2014.

| (15) | On parcels with soils with low P-availability (class I) and soils within the target zone (class II), there may be a need to apply additional phosphate from chemical fertiliser. Such fertilisers should not be used on parcels with soils with a moderate P-availability (class III) and soils with a high P-availability (class IV). |
| --- | --- |

(15)

On parcels with soils with low P-availability (class I) and soils within the target zone (class II), there may be a need to apply additional phosphate from chemical fertiliser. Such fertilisers should not be used on parcels with soils with a moderate P-availability (class III) and soils with a high P-availability (class IV).

| (16) | Flanders has a dense network of water quality monitoring stations. That network can be used as an alternative to the current derogation monitoring network and should allow to observe the performance of farms benefitting from an authorisation in accordance with the derogation requested by Belgium in comparison to farms that do not benefit from such an authorisation, and to monitor whether the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC are achieved. Further research should be done in order to better understand the connection between nitrate losses on parcel level and the nitrate concentration in surface water and ground water at the level of a (sub) catchment, in order to calibrate and validate the nutrient emission model. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Flanders has a dense network of water quality monitoring stations. That network can be used as an alternative to the current derogation monitoring network and should allow to observe the performance of farms benefitting from an authorisation in accordance with the derogation requested by Belgium in comparison to farms that do not benefit from such an authorisation, and to monitor whether the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC are achieved. Further research should be done in order to better understand the connection between nitrate losses on parcel level and the nitrate concentration in surface water and ground water at the level of a (sub) catchment, in order to calibrate and validate the nutrient emission model.

| (17) | After examination of the request it can be considered that the proposed amounts of respectively 250 and 200 kg per hectare per year of nitrogen from grazing livestock manure and treated manure, will not prejudice the achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met, which should apply in addition to the reinforced measures taken in the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

After examination of the request it can be considered that the proposed amounts of respectively 250 and 200 kg per hectare per year of nitrogen from grazing livestock manure and treated manure, will not prejudice the achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met, which should apply in addition to the reinforced measures taken in the action programme for the period 2019 to 2022.

| (18) | Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) lays down general rules aimed at the establishment of the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the Union for the purposes of environmental policies of the Union and policies or activities which may have an impact on the environment. Where applicable, the spatial information collected in the context of this Decision should be in line with the provisions set out in that Directive. In order to reduce the administrative burden and enhance data coherence, Belgium, when collecting the necessary data under this Decision should, where appropriate, make use of the information generated under the Integrated Administration and Control System established pursuant to Chapter II of Title V of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6). |
| --- | --- |

(18)

Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) lays down general rules aimed at the establishment of the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the Union for the purposes of environmental policies of the Union and policies or activities which may have an impact on the environment. Where applicable, the spatial information collected in the context of this Decision should be in line with the provisions set out in that Directive. In order to reduce the administrative burden and enhance data coherence, Belgium, when collecting the necessary data under this Decision should, where appropriate, make use of the information generated under the Integrated Administration and Control System established pursuant to Chapter II of Title V of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6).

| (19) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Nitrates Committee set up pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 91/676/EEC, |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Nitrates Committee set up pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 91/676/EEC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Derogation

The derogation requested by Belgium, on behalf of the Flanders region, for the purpose of allowing the land application of a higher amount of nitrogen from livestock manure than that provided for in the first sentence of the second subparagraph of point 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC, is granted, subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 4 to 12 of this Decision.

Article 2

Scope

The derogation granted pursuant to Article 1 shall apply to specified parcels of a farm on which crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season are cultivated and for which an authorisation has been granted in accordance with Articles 4 to 7.

Article 3

Definitions

For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions shall apply:

| (a) | ‘farms’ means agriculture holdings with or without livestock rearing; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

‘farms’ means agriculture holdings with or without livestock rearing;

| (b) | ‘parcel’ means an individual field or a group of fields, homogeneous regarding cropping, soil type and fertilisation practices; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘parcel’ means an individual field or a group of fields, homogeneous regarding cropping, soil type and fertilisation practices;

| (c) | ‘grassland’ means permanent or temporary grassland (generally temporary lies less than four years); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘grassland’ means permanent or temporary grassland (generally temporary lies less than four years);

| (d) | ‘crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season’ means any of the following:






  (i) | grassland; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(d)

‘crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season’ means any of the following:

(i)

grassland;

| (ii) | grassland with less than 50 % of clover; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

grassland with less than 50 % of clover;

| (iii) | maize undersown, before or after harvest, with grass mowed and removed from the field acting as a catch crop; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

maize undersown, before or after harvest, with grass mowed and removed from the field acting as a catch crop;

| (iv) | cut grassland or cut rye followed by maize; |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

cut grassland or cut rye followed by maize;

| (v) | winter wheat or triticale followed by a catch crop; |
| --- | --- |

(v)

winter wheat or triticale followed by a catch crop;

| (vi) | sugar or fodder beets; |
| --- | --- |

(vi)

sugar or fodder beets;

| (e) | ‘grazing livestock’ means cattle (with the exclusion of veal calves), sheep, goats and horses; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

‘grazing livestock’ means cattle (with the exclusion of veal calves), sheep, goats and horses;

| (f) | ‘manure treatment’ means the processing of manure in two fractions, a solid and a liquid fraction, performed to improve land application and enhance nitrogen and phosphorus recovery; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

‘manure treatment’ means the processing of manure in two fractions, a solid and a liquid fraction, performed to improve land application and enhance nitrogen and phosphorus recovery;

| (g) | ‘treated manure’ means the liquid fraction resulting from manure treatment; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

‘treated manure’ means the liquid fraction resulting from manure treatment;

| (h) | ‘effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content’ means treated manure with a maximum nitrogen content of 1 kg per ton effluent and a maximum phosphate content of 1 kg per ton effluent; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

‘effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content’ means treated manure with a maximum nitrogen content of 1 kg per ton effluent and a maximum phosphate content of 1 kg per ton effluent;

| (i) | ‘soil profile’ means the soil layer below ground level to a depth of 0,90 m, unless the average highest groundwater level is shallower; in this latter case it shall be to a depth of the average highest groundwater level. |
| --- | --- |

(i)

‘soil profile’ means the soil layer below ground level to a depth of 0,90 m, unless the average highest groundwater level is shallower; in this latter case it shall be to a depth of the average highest groundwater level.

| (j) | ‘fertilisation plan’ means an advance calculation about the planned use and availability of nutrients; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

‘fertilisation plan’ means an advance calculation about the planned use and availability of nutrients;

| (k) | ‘fertilisation account’ means the nutrient balance based on the real use and uptake of nutrients. |
| --- | --- |

(k)

‘fertilisation account’ means the nutrient balance based on the real use and uptake of nutrients.

Article 4

Annual application and commitment

1.   Farmers who want to benefit from derogation under this Decision shall submit an application to the competent authorities annually by 15 February. For the year 2019, the annual application shall be submitted by 31 July.

2.   Together with the annual application referred to in paragraph 1, the farmers shall undertake in writing to fulfil the conditions provided for in Articles 6, 7 and 8.

Article 5

The granting of authorisations

Authorisations to apply a higher amount of nitrogen from livestock manure shall be granted subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 6, 7 and 8.

Article 6

Conditions regarding manure treatment

1.   The competent authorities shall ensure that the solid fraction resulting from manure treatment are delivered to authorised installations for recycling.

The authorised installations shall submit to the competent authorities each year the amount of manure received for treatment and the destination of the solid fraction and of the treated manure and their contents of nitrogen and phosphorus.

2.   Farmers benefitting from the derogation who carry out manure treatment shall submit each year to the competent authorities the data related to the amount of manure sent to treatment and the amount of treated manure received and their contents of nitrogen and phosphorus.

3.   The competent authorities shall establish and regularly update the methodologies to assess the composition of treated manure, the variations in composition and treatment efficiency for each farm benefitting from an individual derogation.

4.   The competent authorities shall ensure that ammonia and other emissions from manure treatment is collected and treated so as to reduce environmental impact and nuisance for those installations that cause higher emissions than the reference situation, which is storage and land application of raw livestock manure.

5.   The competent authorities shall ensure that an inventory of installations requiring emission treatment is established and regularly updated.

Article 7

Conditions regarding the application of manure and other fertilisers

1.   Subject to the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2 to 11, the amount of grazing livestock manure, treated manure and effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content applied each year, including the manure applied by the animals themselves, shall not exceed any of the following values:

| (a) | 250 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year on parcels cultivated with the following:






  (i) | grassland and maize undersown with grassland; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

250 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year on parcels cultivated with the following:

(i)

grassland and maize undersown with grassland;

| (ii) | cut grassland followed by maize; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

cut grassland followed by maize;

| (iii) | cut rye followed by maize; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

cut rye followed by maize;

| (iv) | grassland with less than 50 % of clover; |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

grassland with less than 50 % of clover;

| (b) | 200 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year on parcels cultivated with the following:






  (i) | winter wheat followed by a catch crop; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

200 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year on parcels cultivated with the following:

(i)

winter wheat followed by a catch crop;

| (ii) | triticale followed by a catch crop; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

triticale followed by a catch crop;

| (iii) | sugar or fodder beets. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

sugar or fodder beets.

2.   Treated manure may only be applied if it has a nitrogen to phosphate ratio (N/P2O5) of minimum 3,3 to 1, unless it qualifies as effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content.

3.   The total nitrogen and phosphate land application shall correspond to the nutrient demand of the considered crop and take into account the supply from the soil and the increased manure nitrogen availability due to treatment. It shall not exceed the maximum amounts established in the Manure Decree for the land application of phosphate and nitrogen.

4.   Phosphate from chemical fertiliser shall not be applied except on soils with low P-availability (class I) and soils in the target zone (class II).

5.   A fertilisation plan shall be prepared and kept for each farm, for its whole acreage.

The fertilisation plan shall include the following:

| (a) | the number of livestock; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the number of livestock;

| (b) | a description of the housing and storage system, including the volume of manure storage available; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a description of the housing and storage system, including the volume of manure storage available;

| (c) | a calculation of manure nitrogen (minus losses in housing and storage) and phosphorus produced in the farm; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

a calculation of manure nitrogen (minus losses in housing and storage) and phosphorus produced in the farm;

| (d) | the description of manure treatment and expected characteristics of treated manure; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the description of manure treatment and expected characteristics of treated manure;

| (e) | the amount, type and characteristics of manure delivered outside the farm or to the farm; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the amount, type and characteristics of manure delivered outside the farm or to the farm;

| (f) | the crop rotation and acreage of parcels with crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season and parcels with other crops; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the crop rotation and acreage of parcels with crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season and parcels with other crops;

| (g) | the foreseeable nitrogen and phosphorus crop requirements for each parcel; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

the foreseeable nitrogen and phosphorus crop requirements for each parcel;

| (h) | results of soil analysis related to nitrogen and phosphorus soil status if available; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

results of soil analysis related to nitrogen and phosphorus soil status if available;

| (i) | a calculation of nitrogen and phosphorus application from manure over each parcel; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

a calculation of nitrogen and phosphorus application from manure over each parcel;

| (j) | a calculation of nitrogen and phosphorus application from chemical and other fertilisers over each parcel; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

a calculation of nitrogen and phosphorus application from chemical and other fertilisers over each parcel;

| (k) | calculations for assessment of compliance with nitrogen and phosphorus application standards. |
| --- | --- |

(k)

calculations for assessment of compliance with nitrogen and phosphorus application standards.

The fertilisation plans shall be available at the farm for each calendar year by 15 February of that year. It shall be revised no later than seven days following any change in agricultural practices.

6.   Fertilisation accounts shall be prepared by each farm. They shall be submitted to the competent authority for each calendar year by 15 March of the following calendar year.

7.   The fertilisation account shall set out the following:

| (a) | the crop acreages; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the crop acreages;

| (b) | the number and type of livestock; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the number and type of livestock;

| (c) | the manure production per animal; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the manure production per animal;

| (d) | the amount of fertilisers imported by the farm; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the amount of fertilisers imported by the farm;

| (e) | the amount of manure offloaded from the farm and to whom. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the amount of manure offloaded from the farm and to whom.

8.   Results of nitrogen and phosphorus analysis in the soil shall be available for each farm benefitting from the derogation.

Sampling and analysis for nitrogen and for phosphorus shall be carried out at least once every four years no later than 31 May for each homogeneous area of the farm, with regard to crop rotation and soil characteristics.

At least one analysis per five hectares of farmland shall be carried out.

9.   Nitrate concentration in the soil profile shall be measured by accredited laboratories every year between 1 October 15 November on at least 6 % of all parcels benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and 1 % of the other parcels in use by farms benefitting from that authorisation, in such a way that at least 85 % of those farms are involved. At least three samples representing three different soil layers within the soil profile shall be taken for every 2 hectares of farmland.

10.   Manure, treated manure or effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content with a total nitrogen content higher than 0,60 kg nitrogen per ton, chemical and other fertilisers shall not be spread on parcels benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, between 1 September of each year and 15 February of the following year.

11.   At least two thirds of the amount of nitrogen from manure, excluding nitrogen from manure from grazing livestock, shall be applied before 1 June each year.

Article 8

Conditions regarding land management

1.   Farmers benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 shall plough grassland between 15 February and 30 April. Ploughing grassland for grassland renewal and ploughing of grassland on clay soils may take place also between 15 September and 30 October.

2.   Farmers benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 shall sow crops with high nitrogen demand within 2 weeks after ploughing of grassland, except on clay soils ploughed between 15 September and 30 October.

3.   When permanent grassland is ploughed, no fertilisations shall be applied except for cereals, rapeseed, beets, grassland and Brussels sprouts following soil analysis taking into account mineral nitrogen and other parameters providing reference for estimate of nitrogen release from soil organic matter mineralisation.

4.   Crop rotation shall not include leguminous or other plants fixing atmospheric nitrogen. However, crop rotation may include clover in grassland with less than 50 % clover.

5.   Catch crops shall be seeded within 2 weeks after the harvest of winter wheat and triticale and no later than 15 September.

6.   Catch crops shall not be ploughed before 15 February.

Article 9

Measures on manure production and transport

1.   The competent authorities shall ensure respect of the limitation of the number of livestock which can be kept in each farm (nutrient emission rights) in the region of Flanders according to the provisions set out in the Manure Decree.

2.   The competent authorities shall ensure that manure transport from accredited transporters is recorded through geographic positioning systems for all transports.

3.   The competent authorities shall ensure that manure composition with regard to nitrogen and phosphorus concentration is assessed before each transport. Manure samples shall be analysed by accredited laboratories and the results of the analysis shall be communicated to the competent authorities and to the farmer to which the manure is delivered.

4.   The competent authorities shall ensure that a document specifying the amount of transported manure and its nitrogen and phosphorus content is available during transport.

Article 10

Monitoring

1.   The competent authorities shall ensure that maps showing the percentage of farms, number of parcels, percentage of livestock, percentage of agricultural land and local land use covered by an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, are drawn up for each municipality and updated every year.

2.   Data on crop rotations and agricultural practices covered by individual derogations shall be collected and updated every year by the competent authority.

3.   The monitoring network for sampling of surface and shallow groundwater referred in Article 10(2) of Commission Decision 2008/64/EC (7) shall be maintained to assess the impact of the derogation on water quality. The monitoring network shall include monitoring of the nitrate and phosphate of rivers flowing to the North Sea. The amount of initial monitoring sites shall not be reduced and the location of the sites shall not be changed during the period of applicability of this Decision.

4.   A reinforced monitoring shall be conducted in agricultural catchments on sandy soils.

5.   The monitoring sites, corresponding to at least 150 farms, established under Decision 2008/64/EC shall be maintained until it is replaced from 2020 by a targeted monitoring in order to provide data on local land use, crop rotations and fertilisation practices, soil water, mineral nitrogen in the soil profile in autumn and the phosphorus status of the soil and corresponding nitrogen losses through the root zone, both under derogation and non-derogation conditions. Together with the specific monitoring referred to in paragraph 8, these new arrangements shall allow to evaluate the environmental performance of farms benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 of this Decision compared to farms that are not benefitting from such an authorisation as well as to monitor that the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC are achieved.

The monitoring sites shall include main soil types (clay, loamy, sandy and loessial soils), fertilisation practices and crops

6.   Data on local land use, crop rotations, agricultural practices, nutrient use and manure production on farms benefiting from individual derogations shall be collected annually.

7.   The data referred to in paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Article and in Article 7 shall be used for model-based calculations of the magnitude of nitrate leaching and phosphorus losses from fields where up to 250 kg or up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year of grazing livestock manure and treated manure is applied.

8.   The monitoring network including shallow groundwater, soil water, drainage water and streams in farms belonging to the monitoring network, shall provide data on nitrate and phosphorus concentration in water leaving the root zone and entering the groundwater and surface water system.

9.   The Competent authority shall implement an area specific monitoring from 2020 as a research pilot in at least two (sub)catchments to better understand the connection between nitrate losses on parcel level and the nitrate concentration in surface water and ground water at the level of a (sub)catchment with a view to calibrating and validating the nutrient emission model. That research pilot shall be combined with a pilot project on continuous monitoring of N and P in the water courses.

Article 11

Controls and inspections

1.   All the applications for derogation shall be submitted to administrative control of the competent authorities. Where the control demonstrates that the conditions provided for in Articles 6, 7 and 8 are not fulfilled, the applicant shall be informed thereof. In this case, the application shall be considered to be refused.

2.   A programme of field inspections shall be established by the competent authorities based on risk analysis, results of controls of the previous years and results of general random controls of application of legislation transposing Directive 91/676/EEC.

3.   Field inspections shall be carried out in at least 7 % of the farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, to assess compliance with the conditions set out in Article 6, 7 and 8.

4.   Where it is established in any year that a farm benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 did not fulfil the conditions set out in Articles 6, 7 and 8, the holder of the authorisation shall be sanctioned in accordance with national rules and shall not be eligible for an authorisation the following year.

5.   The results of the measurements referred to in Article 7(8) shall be verified. Where verification demonstrates non-compliance, including that the basic threshold, as defined in the Manure Decree, was exceeded, the farmer shall be informed thereof and an application for authorisation for the following year for the parcel or parcels shall be refused.

6.   The competent authorities shall ensure on-spot controls of at least 2 % of manure transport operations, based on risk assessment and results of administrative controls referred to in paragraph 1.

7.   Controls shall include verification of the fulfilment of the obligations on accreditation, assessment of accompanying documents, verification of manure origin and destination and sampling of transported manure.

8.   Manure sampling may be carried out, where appropriate using automatic manure samplers installed on the vehicles, during loading operations.

9.   Manure samples shall be analysed by laboratories accredited by the competent authorities and results of the analysis shall be communicated to the delivering and to the receiving farmer.

10.   The competent authorities shall be granted the necessary powers and means to verify compliance with the conditions for an authorisation granted under this Decision.

Article 12

Reporting

The competent authorities shall, every year by 30 June, submit a report to the Commission containing the following information:

| (a) | maps showing the percentage of farms, percentage of livestock, percentage of agricultural land and local land use, as well as data on crop rotations and agricultural practices in farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 10(1); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

maps showing the percentage of farms, percentage of livestock, percentage of agricultural land and local land use, as well as data on crop rotations and agricultural practices in farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 10(1);

| (b) | the results of water monitoring, including information on water quality trends for ground, surface waters, and waters flowing to the North Sea, as well as the impact of the derogation on water quality as referred to in Article 10(3); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the results of water monitoring, including information on water quality trends for ground, surface waters, and waters flowing to the North Sea, as well as the impact of the derogation on water quality as referred to in Article 10(3);

| (c) | an evaluation of the nitrate residue in soil profile in autumn for the parcels benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and a comparison with nitrate residue data and trends on parcels that are not benefiting from such an authorisation for similar crop rotations. Parcels that are not benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 should include parcels on farms benefitting from a such an authorisation and parcels on other farms; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

an evaluation of the nitrate residue in soil profile in autumn for the parcels benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and a comparison with nitrate residue data and trends on parcels that are not benefiting from such an authorisation for similar crop rotations. Parcels that are not benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 should include parcels on farms benefitting from a such an authorisation and parcels on other farms;

| (d) | an evaluation of the soil phosphorus status for parcels benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and parcels that are not benefiting from such an authorisation; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

an evaluation of the soil phosphorus status for parcels benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and parcels that are not benefiting from such an authorisation;

| (e) | information on nitrate and phosphorus concentration in water leaving the root zone referred to in Article 10(5); |
| --- | --- |

(e)

information on nitrate and phosphorus concentration in water leaving the root zone referred to in Article 10(5);

| (f) | the data collected on local land use, crop rotations, agricultural practices, nutrient use and manure production, and the results of model-based calculations of the magnitude of nitrate and phosphorus losses from farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 10(6); |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the data collected on local land use, crop rotations, agricultural practices, nutrient use and manure production, and the results of model-based calculations of the magnitude of nitrate and phosphorus losses from farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 10(6);

| (g) | an evaluation of the implementation of the conditions for an authorisation, on the basis of controls at farm and parcel level, as well as controls on manure transport, and information on non-compliant farms, on the basis of the results of the administrative and field inspections; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

an evaluation of the implementation of the conditions for an authorisation, on the basis of controls at farm and parcel level, as well as controls on manure transport, and information on non-compliant farms, on the basis of the results of the administrative and field inspections;

| (h) | information on manure treatment, including further processing and utilisation of the solid fractions, and detailed data on the characteristics of treatments systems, their efficiency and composition of treated manure; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

information on manure treatment, including further processing and utilisation of the solid fractions, and detailed data on the characteristics of treatments systems, their efficiency and composition of treated manure;

| (i) | information on the number of farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and the number of parcels on which treated manure and effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content has been applied as well as the volumes of that manure and effluent; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

information on the number of farms benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5 and the number of parcels on which treated manure and effluent with low nitrogen and phosphate content has been applied as well as the volumes of that manure and effluent;

| (j) | the methodologies to assess the composition of treated manure, the variations in composition and treatment efficiency for each farm benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 6(3); |
| --- | --- |

(j)

the methodologies to assess the composition of treated manure, the variations in composition and treatment efficiency for each farm benefiting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5, as referred to in Article 6(3);

| (k) | the inventory of manure treatment installation as referred to in Article 6(5); |
| --- | --- |

(k)

the inventory of manure treatment installation as referred to in Article 6(5);

| (l) | a summary and an evaluation of data obtained from the area specific monitoring as referred to in Article 10(5); |
| --- | --- |

(l)

a summary and an evaluation of data obtained from the area specific monitoring as referred to in Article 10(5);

| (m) | trends in livestock numbers for each livestock category in Flanders region and in farms benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5. |
| --- | --- |

(m)

trends in livestock numbers for each livestock category in Flanders region and in farms benefitting from an authorisation pursuant to Article 5.

The spatial data contained in the report shall, where applicable, comply with Directive 2007/2/EC. In collecting the necessary data, Belgium shall make use, where appropriate, of the information generated under the Integrated Administration and Control System set up in accordance with Article 67(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.

Article 13

Period of application

This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2022.

Article 14

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2019.

For the Commission

Karmenu VELLA

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1499 of 3 September 2015 granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 234, 8.9.2015, p. 10).

2

(3)  Report of 4 May 2018 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources based on Member State reports for the period 2012-2015, COM(2018) 257 final.

3

(4)  Decreet van 22 December 2006 houdende de bescherming van water tegen de verontreiniging door nitraten uit agrarische bronnen (Belgisch Staatsblad of 29 December 2006, p. 76368).

4

(5)  Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (OJ L 108, 25.4.2007, p. 1).

5

(6)  Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549).

6

(7)  Commission Decision 2008/64/EC of 21 December 2007 granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 16, 19.1.2008, p. 28).

7

---

| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/1206

of 12 July 2019

amending Part 1 of Annex E to Council Directive 92/65/EEC as regards the animal health certificate for trade in dogs, cats and ferrets

(notified under document C(2019) 5210)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 22 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Union of certain animals. Article 10 of that Directive provides that the health requirements for trade in dogs, cats and ferrets are those set out in Article 6 and, where applicable, in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Union of certain animals. Article 10 of that Directive provides that the health requirements for trade in dogs, cats and ferrets are those set out in Article 6 and, where applicable, in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).

| (2) | Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 provides that where the number of dogs, cats or ferrets moved for non-commercial purposes during a single movement exceeds five, those pet animals have to comply with the animal health requirements laid down in Directive 92/65/EEC for the species concerned, except for certain categories of animals for which a derogation is provided for in Article 5(2) of that Regulation under certain conditions. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 provides that where the number of dogs, cats or ferrets moved for non-commercial purposes during a single movement exceeds five, those pet animals have to comply with the animal health requirements laid down in Directive 92/65/EEC for the species concerned, except for certain categories of animals for which a derogation is provided for in Article 5(2) of that Regulation under certain conditions.

| (3) | Following the mandatory review of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 (3), the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 (4) which lays down, inter alia, the rules for the categorisation of Member States, or parts thereof, in view of their eligibility to apply preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 repealed Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 with effect from 1 July 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the mandatory review of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 (3), the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 (4) which lays down, inter alia, the rules for the categorisation of Member States, or parts thereof, in view of their eligibility to apply preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 repealed Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 with effect from 1 July 2018.

| (4) | The list of Member States complying with the rules for categorisation laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 for the whole of their territory or parts thereof is set out in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878 (5). |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The list of Member States complying with the rules for categorisation laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 for the whole of their territory or parts thereof is set out in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878 (5).

| (5) | It is therefore appropriate to replace the references to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 by references to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 and to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878 in the model health certificate. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It is therefore appropriate to replace the references to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 by references to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 and to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878 in the model health certificate.

| (6) | Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (7) | In order to avoid any disruption of trade in dogs, cats or ferrets, it is necessary to provide for a transitional period in order to allow, subject to certain conditions, for the use of model animal health certificates issued in accordance with Directive 92/65/EEC, as amended by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/518/EU (6) until 31 December 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In order to avoid any disruption of trade in dogs, cats or ferrets, it is necessary to provide for a transitional period in order to allow, subject to certain conditions, for the use of model animal health certificates issued in accordance with Directive 92/65/EEC, as amended by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/518/EU (6) until 31 December 2019.

| (8) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

For a transitional period until 31 December 2019, Member States shall allow, for the trade in dogs, cats and ferrets, the use of a health certificate issued not later than 30 November 2019 in accordance with the model set out in Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC, as amended by Implementing Decision 2013/518/EU.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2019.

For the Commission

Vytenis ANDRIUKAITIS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54.

1

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on the non-commercial movement of pet animals and repealing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 (OJ L 178, 28.6.2013, p. 1).

2

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 of 14 July 2011 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs (OJ L 296, 15.11.2011, p. 6).

3

(4)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 of 21 November 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 (OJ L 130, 28.5.2018, p. 1).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878 of 18 June 2018 adopting the list of Member States, or parts of the territory of Member States, that comply with the rules for categorisation laid down in Article 2(2) and (3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772 concerning the application of preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs (OJ L 155, 19.6.2018, p. 1).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision 2013/518/EU of 21 October 2013 amending Part 1 of Annex E to Council Directive 92/65/EEC as regards the model health certificate for animals from holdings (OJ L 281, 23.10.2013, p. 14).

6

---

ANNEX

‘
  Part 1 – Health Certificate for trade in animals from holdings (ungulates, birds vaccinated against avian influenza, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets) 92/65 EI

EUROPEAN UNION

Intra trade certificate

Part I: Details of consignment presented

I.1. Consignor

Name

Address

Postal code

I.2. Certificate reference No

I.2.a. Local reference No

I.3. Central competent authority

I.4. Local competent authority

I.5. Consignee

Name

Address

Postal code

I.6. No(s) of related original certificates

No(s) of accompanying documents

I.7.

I.8. Country of origin

ISO code

I.9. Region of origin

Code

I.10. Country of destination

ISO code

I.11. Region of destination

Code

I.12. Place of origin

Holding

Name Approval/registration number

Address

Postal code

I.13. Place of destination

Holding Establishment Approved body

Name Approval number

Address

Postal code

I.14. Place of loading

Postal code

I.15. Date and time of departure

I.16. Means of transport

Aeroplane Ship Railway wagon

Road vehicle Other

Identification

I.17. Transporter

Name Approval number

Address

Postal code

I.18. Description of commodity

I.19. Commodity code (CN code)

I.20. Quantity

I.21.

I.22. Number of packages

I.23. Seal/Container No

I.24.

I.25. Commodities certified for:

Breeding Production Artificial reproduction Slaughter Pets Approved body

I.26. Transit through third country

Third country ISO code

Exit point Code

Entry point BIP No

I.27. Transit through Member States

Member State ISO code

Member State ISO code

Member State ISO code

I.28. Export

Third country ISO code

Exit point Code

I.29. Estimated journey time

I.30. Route plan

Yes No

I.31. Identification of the commodities

Species(Scientific name)

Identification system

Identification number

Passport number

Sex

Age

Quantity

EUROPEAN UNION

92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds (2), lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)

II. Health information

II.a. Certificate reference No

II.b.

Part II: Certification

I, the undersigned official veterinarian (1)/veterinarian responsible for the holding of origin and approved by the competent authority (1) certify that:

II.1. the animals described in Box I.31 comply with the conditions of Article 4 of Council Directive 92/65/EEC and at the time of inspection were fit to be transported for the intended journey in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005.

(1) either [II.2. the ruminant(s) (1)/suidae (1) other than that/those covered by Council Directive 64/432/EEC (1) or Council Directive 91/68/EEC (1)

(a) belong(s) to the species ;

(b) at the time of examination, do(does) not show any clinical sign of any disease to which it/they is/are susceptible;

(c) come(s) from an officially tuberculosis-free (1)/officially brucellosis-free (1) or brucellosis-free (1) herd (1)/holding (1) not subject to swine fever restrictions or from a holding where it/they was/were subjected with negative results to the tests laid down in Article 6(2)(b) (1)/the test laid down in Article 6(3)(d) (1) of Council Directive 92/65/EEC.]

(1) (2) or [II.2. the birds other than those referred to in Council Directive 2009/158/EC

(a) at the time of examination do not show any clinical sign of any disease to which they are susceptible;

(b) satisfy the requirements of Article 7 of Council Directive 92/65/EEC;

(c) conform to Commission Decision 2007/598/EC and were vaccinated against avian influenza on (date) with vaccine (name) and come from a holding on which vaccination against avian influenza was carried out during the past 12 months.]

(1) or [II.2. the lagomorphs

(a) at the time of examination do not show any clinical signs of disease to which they are susceptible;

(b) satisfy the requirements of Article 9 of Council Directive 92/65/EEC.]

(1) or [II.2. the dogs

(a) at the time of examination by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority within 48 hours prior to the time of dispatch, showed no signs of diseases;

(b) are marked in accordance with Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

(1) either [(c) were at least 12 weeks old at the time of vaccination against rabies and at least 21 days have elapsed since the completion of the primary anti-rabies vaccination carried out in accordance with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and any subsequent revaccination was carried out within the period of validity of the preceding vaccination];

(1) or [(c) are less than 12 weeks old and have not received an anti-rabies vaccination, or are between 12 and 16 weeks old and have received an anti-rabies vaccination, but 21 days at least have not elapsed since the completion of the primary vaccination against rabies carried out in accordance with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and

(i) the Member State of destination has informed the public in accordance with point (b) of Article 37(2) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council that it authorises the movement of such animals into its territory; and they are accompanied by

EUROPEAN UNION

92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds (2), lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)

II. Health information

II.a. Certificate reference No

II.b.

(1) either [(ii) a declaration of the owner (3), attached to this certificate, stating that from birth until the time of dispatch the animals have had no contact with wild animals of species susceptible to rabies];

(1) or [(ii) their mother, on whom they still depend, and from the passport of their mother, it can be established that the mother received before their birth an anti-rabies vaccination which complied with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council];

(d) are accompanied by a passport drawn up in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2013;

(1) and [(e) due to their scheduled destination (4) indicated in Box I.10, or in Box I.11 where regionalisation is applied, have been treated against Echinococcus multilocularis in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/772]];

(1) or [II.2. the cats (1)/ferrets (1)

(a) at the time of examination by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority within 48 hours prior to the time of dispatch, showed no signs of diseases;

(b) are marked in accordance with Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

(1) either [(c) were at least 12 weeks old at the time of vaccination against rabies and at least 21 days have elapsed since the completion of the primary anti-rabies vaccination carried out in accordance with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and any subsequent revaccination was carried out within the period of validity of the preceding vaccination];

(1) or [(c) are less than 12 weeks old and have not received an anti-rabies vaccination, or are between 12 and 16 weeks old and have received an anti-rabies vaccination, but 21 days at least have not elapsed since the completion of the primary vaccination against rabies carried out in accordance with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and

(i) the Member State of destination has informed the public in accordance with point (b) of Article 37(2) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council that it authorises the movement of such animals into its territory; and they are accompanied by

(1) either [(ii) a declaration of the owner (3), attached to this certificate, stating that from birth until the time of dispatch the animals have had no contact with wild animals of species susceptible to rabies];

(1) or [(ii) their mother, on whom they still depend, and from the passport of their mother, it can be established that the mother received before their birth an anti-rabies vaccination which complied with the validity requirements set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council];

(d) are accompanied by a passport drawn up in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2013.]

(1) or [II.2. the dogs (1)/cats (1)/ferrets (1) are destined for a body, institute or centre described in Box I.13 and approved in accordance with Annex C to Council Directive 92/65/EEC, and

(a) at the time of examination by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority within 48 hours prior to the time of dispatch, showed no signs of diseases;

(b) are marked in accordance with Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

EUROPEAN UNION

92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds (2), lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)

II. Health information

II.a. Certificate reference No

II.b.

(c) are accompanied by a passport drawn up in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2013.]

II.3. The additional guarantees regarding diseases listed in Annex B (5) to Council Directive 92/65/EEC are as follows (1):

Disease Decision

Disease Decision

Disease Decision

Notes

Part I:

Box I.6: No(s) of accompanying documents: CITES, if applicable.

Box I.19: Use the appropriate CN code: 01.06.19, 01.06.31, 01.06.32, 01.06.39.

Box I.31: Identification system: individual identification must be used wherever possible but in the case of small animals, batch identification may be used. In the case of dogs, cats and ferrets, select passport.

Identification number: in the case of dogs, cats and ferrets, indicate the alphanumeric code of the tattoo or transponder.

Passport number: in the case of dogs, cats and ferrets, indicate the unique alphanumeric code of the passport.

Part II:

(1) Delete as necessary.

(2) Certification requirements only apply to birds that have been vaccinated against avian influenza under a preventive vaccination plan approved by Commission Decision 2007/598/EC.

(3) The declaration referred to in point II.2 to be attached to the certificate shall be drawn up in accordance with Annex I to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2013.

(4) Member States or parts thereof listed in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/878.

(5) As requested by a Member State benefiting from additional guarantees under Union legislation.

The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.

This certificate is valid for 10 days from the date of signature of the official veterinarian or of the veterinarian responsible for the holding of origin and approved by the competent authority.

Official veterinarian

Name (in capital letters): Qualification and title:

Local veterinary unit: LVU No:

Date: Signature:

Stamp:

---