alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 23, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 23
- 00173
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF R .B.P.M., CHILD On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 23225
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Goldstein This appeal challenges the trial court’s order holding appellant in contempt fo r failure to pay child support. Because a contempt order is reviewable by petition for writ of mandamus or habeas corpus rather than direct appeal, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal and directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing ou r concern. See
In re Martin , 523 S.W.3d 165, 169 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2017, orig. proceeding)

. Although appellant filed a brief, he fails to show how we have appellate jurisdiction over the contempt order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and all pendin g motions

. See id. ; see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

230173f.p05 /Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ / BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF R.B.P.M., CHILD
No. 05

- 23

- 00173

- CV On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 23225. Opinion delivered by Justice Goldstein, Justices Nowell and Breedlove participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 23 rd day of May 2023.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12(a)1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Telemig Celular Participacoes S.A. (the "Company") is filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 2002 (the "Report").

         I, Antonio Jose Ribeiro dos Santos, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

         (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Antonio Jose Ribeiro dos Santos
-----------------------------------
Antonio Jose Ribeiro dos Santos
Chief Executive Officer
May, 7, 2003
#### Leon M. Wolfe and Wallace A. Carter, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted in Lake County, Florida, as principals in the second degree to the crime of robbery.

On careful analysis of the record we do not think the verdict in this case accords with the manifest weight of the evidence or with the justice of the cause, so the judgment will be and is hereby reversed and a new trial awarded. Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 South. Rep. 618.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Elias, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 5-05] 

      ( print page 55423)    
The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows: 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, September 29, 2005, at 10 a.m. 

# Subject Matter:

Issuance of Proposed Decisions in Claims Against Albania. 

# Status:

Open. 

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6988. 

Dated at Washington, DC. 

Mauricio J. Tamargo, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 05-18934 Filed 9-19-05; 11:31 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1910-BJ-4789] ES-053738, Group No. 41, Missouri] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Missouri. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 

The lands we surveyed are: 

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Missouri 

T. 54 N., Rs. 1 and 2 W. 

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of portions of the township boundaries, portions of the subdivisional lines and the survey of the Lock and Dam No. 24 acquisition boundary, in Township 54 North, Ranges 1 and 2 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Missouri, and was accepted on September 28, 2005. 

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be made available to the public as a matter of information. 

Dated: September 28, 2005. 

Stephen D. Douglas, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor. 

[FR Doc. 05-20173 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Phillip Robert SCOTT, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA17-1181

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

NO ERROR.
NO. 07

- 12

- 00 71

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MARCH 12 , 2012

In re DYANNE KUSTER, RELATOR

___________________________

Concurring Opinion

___________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK , JJ.

I join in the majority's opinion but would also deny the request for habeas relief

due to inadequate briefing. It is not the reviewing court's job to develop arguments for

the applicant and uncover authority supporting it.

Brian Quinn

Chief Justice
# Official Journal L 295/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 295 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6214 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 295

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6214 November 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Samuel RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D01-3110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 18, 2003.

Rehearing, Clarification and Certification Denied Aug. 1, 2003.

John H. Lipinski, Hollywood, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and John D. Barker, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Ozell v. State,*837 So.2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
#### Lawrence TUCKER, Jr. Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D03-2545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 5, 2003.

Lawrence Tucker, Jr., Tampa, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Tucker petitions this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus to permit the late filing of his appeal in a criminal case. He alleges his trial counsel led him to believe an appeal had been timely filed, when in fact it had not been filed. This is a meritorious circumstance for which belated appeals in criminal cases are granted. However, Tucker’s petition is not sworn to as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3)(F). Accordingly, we deny Tucker’s petition without prejudice to file a sworn petition in compliance with rule 9.141(c)(3)(F).

Petition for Belated Notice of Appeal DENIED Without Prejudice.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.8 Form of Stock Option Grant2



		

			 

		




		
			EXHIBIT 10.8
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Date
		

		
			 
		

		
			[Employee Name]
		

		
			[Address][City, State Zip Code]
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear [   ]:
		

		
			Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the AVX Corporation 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 'Plan'), you have been granted an Incentive Stock Option to purchase [   ] shares of stock as outlined below.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Granted To:            [     ]
		

		
			 
		

		
			Grant Date:            [      ]
		

		
			Granted:            [      ]
		

		
			Grant Price:$[     ]            Total Cost to Exercise:            $[      ]
		

		
			Expiration Date:            [      ]
		

		
			Vesting Schedule:            25% per year for 4 years
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		

		

		 


		

			 

		




 


		

			 

		




		
		

		
			Date
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			[Employee Name]
		

		
			[Address][City, State Zip Code]
		

		
			Dear [   ]:
		

		
			Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the AVX Corporation 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 'Plan'), you have been granted a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase [    ] shares of stock as outlined below.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Granted To:            [   ]
		

		
			 
		

		
			Grant Date:            [   ]
		

		
			Granted:            [   ]
		

		
			Grant Price:$[   ]            Total Cost to Exercise:            $[   ]
		

		
			Expiration Date:            [   ]
		

		
			Vesting Schedule:            Special Vesting
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			 
		

		
			Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan, you have been granted an Incentive Stock Option to purchase [    ] shares of stock as outlined below.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Granted To:            [   ]
		

		
			 
		

		
			Grant Date:            [   ]
		

		
			Granted:            [   ]
		

		
			Grant Price:$[   ]            Total Cost to Exercise:            $[   ]
		

		
			Expiration Date:            [   ]
		

		
			Vesting Schedule:            Special Vesting
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
		

		
			[  ] on xx/xx/xx
STATE v. Michael Eugene BOWDEN

221P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Michael Eugene Bowden, for Bowden, Michael Eugene.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Hudson, J. and Jackson, J. recused
Table of Contents
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Annual Report of TELEMIG PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernesto Gardelliano, Chief Financial Officer , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge: 

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
  Date: April 22, 2009      By: /s/ Ernesto Gardelliano     Name: Ernesto Gardelliano   Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019060EN.01003701.xml

| 15.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/37

---

Corrigendum to Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Request made by a Contracting Entity

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 58 of 14 February 2019
  )

(2019/C 60/10)

On page 15, and on the cover page, header: ‘Other acts — European Commission’ should be replaced by header: ‘Notices — Notices concerning the European Economic Area — EFTA Surveillance Authority’.

---
# Official Journal C 24A/21 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 24A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6221 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 24A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6221 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2019/C 24 A/01 | Recruitment Notice No CDR/SG/AD16/01/19 concerning a post of Secretary-General (M/F) in the secretariat-general of the European Committee of the Regions (Recruitment grade AD16/3) (Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS)) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2019/C 24 A/01

Recruitment Notice No CDR/SG/AD16/01/19 concerning a post of Secretary-General (M/F) in the secretariat-general of the European Committee of the Regions (Recruitment grade AD16/3) (Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS))

(Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS))

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Leon GREEN, Jr.

No. 434P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Leslie C. Rawls, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Michael Leon Green, Jr., for Green, Michael Leon (Jr.).

Richard H. Bradford, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2005/C 200/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBOURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA - ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
1

NO. 04-15-00312-CV

__________________________________________________________________ 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

__________________________________________________________________ 

Luis and Janeth Moreno, individually and on behalf of their daughter GM 

v. Rosa Vida, Individually 

__________________________________________________________________ 

Trial Court Cause No. 2015CVT000802 D3, in 

the 341st District Court, Webb County, Texas 

The Honorable Beckie Palomo, Presiding 

__________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

__________________________________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS: 

 COMES NOW Appellants Luis and Janeth Moreno, individually and on 

behalf of G.M., and respectfully ask the Court to dismiss this appeal. 

I.

 Appellants are Luis and Janeth Moreno, individually and on behalf of G.M. 

Appellant perfected the appeal on May 15, 2015, when they filed a notice of appeal. 

II.

 On June 12, 2015, Appellants reached a settlement with Appellee’s codefendant in the underlying case, Mary Help of Christians School. 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00312-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/27/2015 4:52:46 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/27/15 4:52:46 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2

III.

The Court has the authority under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) 

to grant this motion to dismiss. Therefore, Appellants request the Court dismiss the 

appeal in whole.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants Luis and Janeth 

Moreno, Individually and on behalf of their daughter G. M. respectfully move this 

Court to dismiss the appeal in whole. Appellants further pray for such other relief, 

at law or in equity, to which they may be justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

BY: “/s/ Ronald Rodriguez”

Ronald Rodriguez

THE LAW OFFICES OF RONALD 

RODRIGUEZ, P.C.

Ronald Rodriguez

SBN 00788306

Willard Clark

SBN 24087307

915 Victoria Street

Laredo, Texas 78040 

(956) 796-1000 – Telephone

(956) 796-1002 – Fax

ron@ronaldrodriguez.com

will@ronaldrodriguez.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS

LUIS AND JANETH MORENO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF 

THEIR DAUGHTER GM (VICTIM)
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I conferred with Counsel for Appellee regarding this motion.

Appellee had not responded at the time of filing this motion.

“/s/ Ronald Rodriguez”

Ronald Rodriguez

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I served opposing counsel on July 27, 2015, in accordance with 

the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

“/s/ Ronald Rodriguez”

Ronald Rodriguez