alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    ERIC
SMITEric Smit  September 29, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain
Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---

|1 |  | The material contained in this Exhibit 99.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry W. Buckley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PHILIP H. SANFORD                
|Philip H. Sanford                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|March 10, 2011
# C_2021395EN.01000101.xml

| 29.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2020-2021 SESSION

Sittings of 5 to 8 October 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW136681] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW136681 from Redstone Resources, Inc., Preston Reynolds & Co., Inc., and CH4 Energy, LLC for lands in Campbell County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW136681 effective July 1, 2004, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 05-20161 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-U
IN RE: E.D.

125PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 2018

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for E.D.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 29th of August 2018 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2018."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 10th day of October 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Northfield LaboratoriesInc. on Form 10-Kfor the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Jack J. Kogut, Chief FinancialOfficer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of Northfield Laboratories Inc./s/ Jack J. Kogut Jack J. KogutChief Financial OfficerDate: August 11, 2006
In the MATTER OF: D.M.O.

No. COA17-1342

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA is submitting the following information collection to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until March 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, Fax No. 
703-518-6669, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aec3cdc0cfc3cfdccfeec0cddbcf80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb0beb3bcb0bcafbc9db3bea8bcf3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Forms and Instructions for Central Liquidity Facility Loans.
    OMB Number: 3133-0064.
    Form Number: NCUA--7000, 7001, 7002, 7003 and 7004.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Description: Forms used by each borrower from the CLF.
    Respondents: Credit unions that borrow from the CLF.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Record keepers: 25.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: Other. As the need for borrowing arises.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: 0.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on January 27, 
2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-2009 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE v. Michelle Smith WHITE

302A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2018

Andrew J. DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for White, Michelle Smith

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Michael Dodd, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

*735The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of November 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 13th day of December 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Foronte MCPHAUL

No. 421PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Ms. Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, Mr. William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Sara B. Warf, Clinical Assistant Professor of Law, Ms. Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for NC State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of December 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002.



I, Guglielmo Noya, Chief Financial Officer
of TIM Participações S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.	the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2.	the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TIM Participações
S.A.



Dated:	April 14, 2016



|By: | /s/ Guglielmo Noya            
|--- | ------------------------------
|    | Name:	Guglielmo Noya          
|    | Title:	Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOTHAR KUSTER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL W. FOLEY, Director of

Planning for the County of Maui (as an

individual); CHARLES VILLALON,

Building Inspector for the County of Maui

(as an individual); TY FUKUROKU,

Engineer for the County of Maui (as an

individual); JAY ARAKAWA, Zoning

Inspector for the County of Maui (as an

individual); COUNTY OF MAUI, a

governmental entity,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-16552

D.C. Nos. 1:07-CV-00264-

SOM-BMK

1:07-CV-00265- 

 SOM-BMK

District of Hawaii, 

Honolulu

ORDER

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

The Memorandum Disposition filed on June 10, 2011, is amended as

follows:

On page 6, line 4, insert “violation” between “constitutional” and “Kuster.”

FILED

JUN 28 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
STATE v. Guy Tobias LEGRANDE

327P02-10

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Guy Tobias LeGrande, for LeGrande, Guy Tobias.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, T. Lynn Clodfelter, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Defendant for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
Philip ROBINSON, Richard Maurice Robinson, and Gwendolyn Robinson McKeown, Plaintiffs, v. Grace Maney SPIRES, Individually and as Trustee under the W.N. Horton and E.L. Horton Trust dated May 5, 1951, and Margaret Maney Clarke, Individually and as acting Trustee under the W.N. Horton and E.L. Horton Trust dated May 5, 1951; and William W. Clarke, Individually and as acting Trustee under the W.N. Horton and E.L. Horton Trust dated May 5, 1951, Defendants.

No. COA15-963.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4431 

To provide that, if emergency unemployment compensation is extended, 

prospective benefits shall be subject to gradual reduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2014 

Mr. BENTIVOLIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide that, if emergency unemployment compensation 

is extended, prospective benefits shall be subject to gradual reduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDITION. 

4 In the event that a law extending title IV of the Sup5 plemental Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110– 

6 252; 26 U.S.C. 3304) is enacted on or after the date of 

7 enactment of this Act, then, effective with respect to emer8 gency unemployment compensation payable for each week 

9 beginning on or after such date of enactment or, if later, 

10 the effective date of the extension (the first such week, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4431 IH

1 in the case of any individual, to be referred to as the indi2 vidual’s ‘‘initial post-extension week’’), section 2 shall 

3 apply. 

4 SEC. 2. REDUCTION. 

5 Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Sup6 plemental Appropriations Act, 2008, the amount of emer7 gency unemployment compensation payable to any indi8 vidual under such title shall— 

9 (1) for the first week of unemployment fol10 lowing the initial post-extension week described in 

11 section 1, be equal to— 

12 (A) the amount that would otherwise be 

13 payable, 

14 (B) reduced by 5 percent; and 

15 (2) for each week of unemployment subsequent 

16 to the week of unemployment to which paragraph 

17 (1) applies, be equal to— 

18 (A) the amount that would otherwise be 

19 payable, 

20 (B) reduced by— 

21 (i) the percentage reduction applicable 

22 under this section to the individual’s pre23 ceding week of unemployment, 

24 (ii) increased by 5 percentage points, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4431 IH

1 but not below zero. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
RE: EXPANSION OF ELECTRONIC FILING PILOT PROGRAM-COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Appellate Case No. 2015-002439

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 28, 2018

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article V, Section 4 of the South Carolina Constitution,

IT IS ORDERED that the Pilot Program for the Electronic Filing (E-Filing) of documents in the Court of Common Pleas, which was established by Order dated December 1, 2015, is expanded to include Union County. Effective March 20, 2018, all filings in all common pleas cases commenced or pending in Union County must be E-Filed if the party is represented by an attorney, unless the type of case or the type of filing is excluded from the Pilot Program. The counties currently designated for mandatory E-Filing are as follows:

```
Aiken Allendale Anderson Bamberg Barnwell Beaufort Cherokee Clarendon Colleton Edgefield Georgetown Greenville Greenwood Hampton Horry Jasper Kershaw Laurens Lee Lexington McCormick Newberry Oconee Pickens Saluda Spartanburg Sumter Williamsburg York **Richland - Reinstated Effective March 8, 2018****Union - Effective March 20, 2018**
```

Attorneys should refer to the South Carolina Electronic Filing Policies and Guidelines, which were adopted by the Supreme Court on October 28, 2015, and the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page at *http://www.sccourts.org/efiling/* to determine whether any specific filings are exempted from the requirement that they be E-Filed. Attorneys who have cases pending in Pilot Counties are strongly encouraged to review, and to instruct their staff to review, *879the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*

Donald W. Beatty

Chief Justice of South Carolina
#### Hector R. TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D02-1217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 11, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 5, 2003.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traína, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Hector R. Torres appeals his convictions for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and possession of marijuana. We affirm.

At trial, a police officer testified over defense objection that a witness had said defendant-appellant “is always armed with a .25 [pistol].” The hearsay objection was well taken. It was not a spontaneous statement “describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declar-ant was perceiving the event or condition....” § 90.803(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). *See*Charles W. Ehrhardt, *Florida Evidence*§ 803.1 (2002). Thus, the hearsay exception for spontaneous statements did not apply.

Likewise, the declarant’s statement was not one which related “to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.” § 90.803(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). The officer’s testimony negated the existence of any stress of excitement on the part of the declarant. Thus, the hearsay exception for excited utterances did not apply. *See*Charles W. Eh-rhardt, *Florida Evidence*§ 803.2.

Under the circumstances of this case, however, the evidentiary error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. DiGuilio,*491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Eric Smit, the chief financialofficer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Patty MEADOWS

400PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 3, 2018

Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, For Meadows, Patty, for State.

Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of August 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of August 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 31st day of August 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2184 

_____________________________

SYLVESTER HAMILTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Melissa G. Olin, Judge.

June 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. Based on our 

review of the record pursuant to Anders,* we note that the 

probation revocation order does not correctly indicate that 

Appellant violated Conditions 1, 2, 3, and 14 of his probation.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Estate of Joseph Kelly, deceased. Appeal of Mary A. Kelly.

Argued March 27, 1899.

Appeal, No. 51, Jan. T., 1899, by Mary A. Kelly, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., April T., 1884, No. 544, sustaining exceptions to adjudication.

Before Gbeen, McCollum:, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Reversed.

*Silas W.*Pettit, with him *Peirce*Mecuteheon, for appellant.

*II. Herbert Pigott,*for appellee.

October 6, 1899:

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

This is an appeal from the same decree as that appealed from by the Fidelity Insurance, Trust and Safe Deposit Company, in which opinion has this day been handed down, ante, p. 45. For the reasons therein stated, the decree of the court modifying the decree of the auditing judge is reversed, and the decree of the said auditing judge is adopted and affirmed as the decree of this Court. As those intrusted with the execution of the will, because of its susceptibility to different interpretations, could not safely execute it without a judicial decree, it is directed that the costs of this appeal be paid out of the fund.