alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Neil Allen SIMCOX v. GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION State of North Carolina COUNTY OF CABARRUS

No. 175P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2018

Neil Allen Simcox, for Simcox, Neil Allen

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 12th of June 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cabarrus County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of June 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Shaun Lamont WILLIAMS

No. COA17-518

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

NO PLAIN ERROR.
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2018

Mr. Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Mr. Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Raleigh, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Carrboro, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers

Ms. Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Irving Joyner, Durham, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Ms. Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Mr. Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Mr. W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Mr. Burton Craige, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Jeremy M. Falcone, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within *375the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of 

Regency Centers Corporation, 

the general partner of 

Regency Centers, L.P.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No. 333-149856) on Form S-3ASR and (No. 333-127274) on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P. of our report dated March 27, 2008, with respect to the combined balance sheet of Regency Retail Partners as ofDecember 31, 2007, and the related combined statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the period from December 21, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annualreport on Form 10-K/A of Regency Centers, L.P. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

March 31, 2009 

Jacksonville, Florida 

Certified Public Accountants
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19909]



[[Page 58225]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Employee Thrift Advisory Council; Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), a notice is hereby given of the 
following committee meeting:
    Name: Employee Thrift Advisory Council.
    Time: 10 a.m.
    Date: October 14, 2005.
    Place: 4th Floor, Conference Room, Federal Retirement Thrift 
Investment Board, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered:

1. Approval of the minutes of the May 4, 2005, meeting.
2. Report of the Executive Director on Thrift Savings Plan status.
3. L Funds.
4. Investment consultant.
5. Hurricane Katrina.
6. New business.

    For further information contact: Elizabeth S. Woodruff, Committee 
Management Officer, on (202) 942-1660.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Elizabeth S. Woodruff,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19909 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### Lynn WORTHAM, Appellant, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., Respondent.

No. ED 81723.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

April 15, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 10, 2003.

William Goldstein, Moran & Goldstein, L.C., Stanley E. Goldstein, Eli Karsh, Li-*12berman, Goldstein *&*Karsh, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Kristine McGee Mack, Michael J. Nes-ter, Donovan, Rose, Nester *&*Joley, P.C., Belleville, IL, for Respondent.

Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Lynn Wortham (plaintiff) appeals from the judgment dismissing her lawsuit against Casino Queen, Inc., (defendant) for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
# Official Journal C 109A/11 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 109A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5711 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 109A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5711 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 109A/01 | Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2014/C 109A/01

Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 109A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 2 |

2014/C 109A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4538 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4538

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
 establish a United States Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2014

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Young of 
  Alaska, and Ms. McCollum) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
 establish a United States Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Ambassador at Large 
for Arctic Affairs Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR AT LARGE FOR ARCTIC AFFAIRS.

    Title I of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2651a et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:

``SEC. 63. UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR AT LARGE FOR ARCTIC AFFAIRS.

    ``(a) Establishment.--There is established within the Department of 
State an Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs (referred to in this 
section as the `Ambassador'), appointed in accordance with subsection 
(b).
    ``(b) Appointment.--The Ambassador shall be appointed by the 
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
    ``(c) Duties.--
            ``(1) Diplomatic representation.--Subject to the direction 
        of the President and the Secretary of State, the Ambassador is 
        authorized to represent the United States in matters and cases 
        relevant to Arctic affairs in--
                    ``(A) contacts with foreign governments, 
                intergovernmental organizations, and specialized 
                agencies of the United Nations, the Arctic Council, and 
                other international organizations of which the United 
                States is a member; and
                    ``(B) multilateral conferences and meetings 
                relating to Arctic affairs.
            ``(2) Chair of the arctic council.--The Ambassador shall 
        serve as the Chair of the Arctic Council when the United States 
        holds the Chairmanship of the Arctic Council from 2015 through 
        2017.
            ``(3) Policies and procedures.--The Ambassador shall 
        coordinate United States Arctic policies.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas STATHAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-932.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 1, 2003.

KELLY, Judge.

Thomas Stathas appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). We affirm the first claim without discussion, and we affirm the second claim without prejudice to any right Stathas may have to refile a facially sufficient motion for prison credit.

On October 30, 1991, Stathas was sentenced to fifteen years in prison followed by five years’ probation in case 91-11524 pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. On that same day, he was also sentenced in case 90-18646. Although it is not clear from the record on appeal or Stathas’ motion what sentence he originally received in case 90-18646, it appears that he received a probationary split sen*882tence in that ease as well.1 Nonetheless, Stathas was released early from prison due to gain time to begin his probation. On May 19, 1998, he was resentenced to five years in prison for violating his probation in both cases.

Stathas alleged that he is entitled to a total of 399 days of credit and that the trial court must award such credit by court order. It appears that he is referring to his entitlement to prison credit for the time he served on the prison portions of his split sentences before he began serving the probation portions. *See Wiggins v. State,*817 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). However, Stathas’ claim is facially insufficient because he did not allege that his entitlement to relief is apparent from the face of the record, nor did he allege how and where his entitlement to relief is demonstrated from the record. *See Jones v. State,*735 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order of denial without prejudice to any right Stathas may have to refíle a facially sufficient motion for prison credit under rule 3.800(a). *See id.*at 542.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

1

. The original judgment and sentence in case 90-18646 is not in the record. However, the violation of probation plea form for case 91-11524 indicates that Stathas also violated probation in case 90-18646, and a judgment and sentence in case 90-18646 dated May 19, 1993, indicates that his probation was revoked and that he was resentenced to five years in prison on that date.
Exhibit
8.1






Telefônica






List
of Subsidiaries




1.       A.
Telecom S.A. (formerly Assist Telefônica) (wholly owned subsidiary)




2.       Companhia
AIX de Participações (50% share ownership)




3.       Companhia
ACT de Participações (50% share ownership)




4.       Aliança
Atlântica Holding B.V. (50% share ownership)




5.       Telefônica
Data S.A. (wholly owned subsidiary)




6.       Telefônica
Sistemas de Televisão S.A. (wholly owned subsidiary)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3439

_____________________________

KAREEM GRADY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James H. Daniel, Judge.

April 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Kareem Grady, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57921-57922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10203 and <greek-i>10204]


Texas Disaster <greek-i>TX-00066

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57922]]

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated 09/24/2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: 09/23/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 09/24/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/24/2005, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Chambers, Galveston, Hardin, Jasper, Jefferson, Liberty, Newton, 
Orange, and Tyler.
Contiguous Counties/Parishes: Texas:
    Angelina, Brazoria, Harris, Montgomery, Polk, Sabine, San 
Augustine, and San Jacinto.
    Louisiana:
    Beauregard, Calcasieu, Cameron, Sabine, and Vernon.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      5.375
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:...............      2.687
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      6.557
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.750
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 102038 
and for economic injury is 102040. (Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-19836 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40213 Conference Calendar

TODD MICHAEL PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus R. MILES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CV-766

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Todd Michael Porter, federal prisoner # 12313-039, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the 252-month sentence imposed following his jury trial conviction for one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine; one count of conspiracy to receive explosives; one count of knowingly and intentionally using, persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing a person under 18 years of age to assist him in avoiding detection; 15 counts of receiving explosives while being a userNo. 05-40213 -2- of a controlled substance; and one count of distributing a controlled substance to a person under the age of 21. Porter argues on appeal that he was actually innocent of two of the offenses for which he was convicted, that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the lack of sufficient evidence to support those convictions, that the district court’s jury instructions violated his constitutional rights under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) , and that his sentence should not have been increased based on obstruction of justice. He contends that he is entitled to seek relief under § 2241 because 28 U.S.C. § 2255 offers an inadequate or ineffective remedy. He contends that § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective because his prior § 2255 motions were dismissed solely on procedural grounds and because he is actually innocent of two of the crimes of which he was convicted. Porter has not shown that the remedy provided in § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (2001); Pack v. Yusuff , 218 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Porter’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.
BPI 2013 10-Q - EX-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2 


BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.
2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the Bridgepoint Education, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) will have the same defined meanings in this Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Award Agreement”).


		
	I.
	NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT


Participant Name:                    
Address:                
You have been granted the right to receive an Award of Restricted Stock Units, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement, as follows:
Grant Number                                    
Date of Grant                                    
Number of Restricted Stock Units                        
Vesting Schedule:


Subject to any acceleration provisions contained in the Plan or set forth below, the Restricted Stock Unit will vest in accordance with the following schedule:
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the Restricted Stock Units will vest on the first (1st) anniversary of the Date of Grant and twenty-five percent (25%) of the Restricted Stock Units will vest on each anniversary of the Date of Grant thereafter, so that all Restricted Stock Units will be fully vested on the four-year anniversary of the Date of Grant.  
In the event Participant ceases to provide Service for any or no reason before the applicable vesting dates set forth above, then Participant's right to acquire any Shares hereunder with respect to any of the Restricted Stock Units that remain unvested as of the date Participant ceases to provide Service will immediately terminate.


By Participant's signature and the signature of the representative of Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (the “Company”) below, Participant and the Company agree that this Award of Restricted Stock Units is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement, including the Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Unit Grant, attached hereto as Exhibit A, all of which are made a part of this document.  Participant has reviewed the Plan and this Award Agreement in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Award Agreement and fully understands all provisions of the Plan and Award Agreement.  Participant hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Company upon any questions relating to the Plan and Award 









Agreement.  Participant further agrees to notify the Company upon any change in the residence address indicated below.


	
		
	PARTICIPANT:
	BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.

	 
	 

	_________________________________
	_________________________________

	Signature
	By

	 
	 

	_________________________________
	_________________________________

	Print Name
	Title

	 
	 

	Residence Address:


	 

	_________________________________
	 

	_________________________________
STATE v. Calvin Steven BROOKS

212P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Dylan J. C. Buffum, Attorney at Law, Calvin Steven Brooks, for Brooks, Calvin Steven.

Melissa H. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*156The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of June 2017 by Defendant for Notice of Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."