alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(b) AND
                  SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
                    UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kahiki Foods, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Alan L. Hoover
----------------------
Alan L. Hoover
Acting President

September 23, 2005



/s/ Julia A. Fratianne
----------------------
Julia A. Fratianne
Treasurer and CFO

September 23, 2005



This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be
deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

                                       18
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Lister, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Lister  
|Michael D. Lister      
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 6, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Harold Lee PLESS, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA17-1270

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

NO ERROR.
#### In the Interest of A.T. and T.T., minor children, G.D.B., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 2D02-5602.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 2003.

Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tanya E. DiFilippo, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Petitioner.

*819PER CURIAM.

We treat this appeal from a nonfinal order as a petition for writ of certiorari and dismiss the petition.

Petition dismissed.

WHATLEY, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

EX. REL. ANTONIO BUNDY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Action in Mandamus” is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Visual Management Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, J.D. Gardner, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                J.D. GardnerChief
                Financial Officer
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON

411A94-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2018

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cassandra Stubbs, Attorney at Law, D. Clark Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, David Weiss, Attorney at Law, Brian W. Stull, Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Attorney at Law, Alex T. Haskell, Attorney at Law, For Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

*369The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Professors John Charles Boger and Robert P. Mosteller for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Karl F. Betz, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

Date: November 7, 2008                 /s/ Karl F. Betz
                                       ----------------
                                       Karl F. Betz
                                       Senior Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                      27
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136738 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

RODNEY MCCORMICK, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136738 

 COA: 275888 

Genesee CC: 06-083549-NI 

LARRY CARRIER, 

Defendant, 

and 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1015 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 22, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. J.C.

No. 405PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Lauren Tally Earnhardt, Assistant Attorney General, William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for J.C.

State of N. C. Judicial Dept., for N.C. Judicial Department.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 27th of November 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 27th of November 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Antonio BULLOCK

No. 194A16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Bullock, Michael Antonio.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 27th of March 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
# C_2005174DE.01002901.xml

| 14.7.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 174/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 174/29

---

Berichtigung der Aufforderung zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen für indirekte FTE-Maßnahmen im Rahmen des spezifischen Programms für Forschung, technologische Entwicklung und Demonstration „Ausgestaltung des Europäischen Forschungsraums“

Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft: Risikobeherrschung und Ethik

FP6-2005-Science-and-society-14

Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft: Risikobeherrschung und Ethik

FP6-2005-Science-and-society-15

Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft: Risikobeherrschung und Ethik

FP6-2005-Science-and-society-17

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 145 vom 15. Juni 2005
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 145 vom 15. Juni 2005

(2005/C 174/10)

Seite 1, Titel:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

---
Order entered February 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00629 - CV No. 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S .C. AND K.C., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 256th J udicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 11 - 16417



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell The s e two appeals follow a final order in suit to modify the parent - child relationship . Cause number 05 - 1 8 - 00629 - CV challenges the modification order as well as several orders, entered during the pendency of the modification suit, enforcing a fee provision in the parties’ divorce decree. Cause number 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV challenges a post - modification order enforc ing the same fee provision. The record in both appeals has been filed. Appellant’s brief in cause number 05 - 18 - 00629 - CV is due February 16, 2019, and his brief in cause number 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV is due February 7, 2019. The fee provision at issue in these tw o appeals is also at issue in appellate cause number 05 - 18 - 01158 - CV, an original proceeding filed by appellant . Relief has been denied, but a motion for rehearing en banc is pending.In light of the same fee provision being at issue in the appeals and o riginal proceeding,

we SUSPEND , on our own motion, the briefing deadlines in the appeals pending the Court’s determination of the en banc motion . /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
IN RE: C.D.W.

No. COA17-352

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2010 |  | /s/ James A. Thomas    
|                       |  | James A. Thomas        
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Maples, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 875]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered December 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), assault in the second degree (two counts), resisting arrest, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the trial court’s determination that the defendant’s proffered explanation for challenging a prospective white juror was pretextual since he did not challenge other. prospective jurors who were similarly situated *(see, People v Smalls,*249 AD2d 495; *People v Vega,*239 AD2d 615; *People v Waldo,*221 AD2d 390). Accordingly, it was not error to seat the juror over the defendant’s objection. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Independent Auditors' Consent



The Unitholders of Regency Centers, L.P.
and the Board of Directors of
Regency Centers Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-58966) on Form S-3 of Regency Centers, L.P. of our reports dated March 8,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers, L.P.
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related financial statement
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form
10-K of Regency Centers, L.P.



/s/ KPMG LLP








Jacksonville, Florida
March 10, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. Jermaine Antwan TART

No. 427PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Sarah Holladay, Attorney at Law, for Tart, Jermaine Antwan

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 14th of December 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

*234Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of January 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of February 2018 by State of NC to Amend: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4416

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2014

Mrs. Kirkpatrick (for herself, Mr. Barber, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
 Salmon, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
 and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MANUEL V. MENDOZA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-26.htm












Exhibit 10.26


 


AMENDMENT TO DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Colonial Bank, FSB (the “Bank”) maintains the Colonial Bank, FSB Director Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011 (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Bank desires to modify the definition of “Normal Retirement Benefit” to provide that the Normal Retirement Benefit of directors under the Plan will equal 50% of their highest three-year average compensation earned from the Board during any three calendar years while serving as a member of the Board; and.


 


WHEREAS, Section 7.2 of the Plan permits the Bank to amend the Plan from time to time; and


 


WHEREAS, such amendment shall have retroactive effect to the initial Effective Date of the Plan.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective immediately:


 


1.           The definition of “Normal Retirement Benefit” at Article II of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


 


               “Normal Retirement Benefit” shall mean 50% of a Director’s highest three-year average Compensation earned from the Board during any three calendar years while serving as a member of the Board.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has executed this Amendment on the date set forth below.


 


 




	  	  	
COLONIAL BANK, F.S.B.


	  	  	  
	 	 	 
	
November 15, 2012

	
By:

	
/s/ Edward J. Geletka

	 
	
Date

	  	
Edward J. Geletka, President and


Chief Executive Officer