alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: In the interest of H.D.

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00007

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 10

- 52475

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

, Texas

A supplemental clerk’s record complying with our Order of Abatement has been filed in this Court. Therefore, we order the appeal reinstated

.
The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to enter William Thursland in the records of this

Court as counsel for a ppellant R.R.D. Mr. Thursland is ORDERED to file a conforming notice of appeal on behalf of R.R.D. within 10 days of the date of this order

.
The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to enter Daniel Lemkuil in the records of this Court as counsel for appellant M

. D .D.

The supplemental clerk’s record indicates that appellants were deemed indigent in the trial court and appointed attorneys ad litem. A parent who the court has determined is indigent for purposes of appointment of an attorney ad litem is presumed to remain indigent for the

duration of t he suit and subsequent appeal. T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 107.013(e).

Therefore, t he Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant s are indigent and are allo wed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of

costs.

It is ORDERED that the District Clerk file with this Court, within 10 days of the date

of this order and at no cost to appellant s , a clerk’s record containing the items specified in Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(k ) (indigent party entitled to free record on appeal); 35.1(b) (in accelerated appeal, record must be filed within 10 days after notice of appeal filed)

.

It is further ORDERED that the Court Report er file with this Court, within 10 days of

the date of this order and at no cost to appellant, the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(k ) ; 35.1(b)

.Due to the previous delays in this appeal, no extensions will be granted absent extraordinary cir cumstances. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 14, 2012
#### Thomas James WELCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas CAREY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-15366.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed Aug. 21, 2003.

David M. Porter, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Stanley A. Cross, AAG, Attorney General’s Office, Janis Shank McLean, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Ap-pellee.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4721 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Flanders, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Flanders, New York. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR FLANDERS, 

4 NEW YORK. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this section, the United States Postal Service shall 

7 designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to the area 

8 encompassing only Flanders, New York. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.




I, Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu, Chief Executive Officer of TIM Participações S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TIM Participações S.A.




Dated:    April15, 2015




By:
/s/  Rodrigo Modesto de AbreuName:    Rodrigo Modesto de AbreuTitle:      Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4660 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study 

on the performance of Federal Government in meeting certain small 

business procurement contracting goals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010 

Mr. HODES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Small Business 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct a study on the performance of Federal Government in meeting certain small business procurement contracting goals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAO STUDY ON PROCUREMENT CONTRACTING 

4 GOALS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN SMALL 

5 BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

6 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United 

7 States shall conduct a study on the performance of the 

8 Federal Government in meeting the goals established 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4660 IH

1 under section 15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

2 644(g)) relating to participation in procurement contracts 

3 by small business concerns owned and controlled by serv4 ice-disabled veterans and small business concerns owned 

5 and controlled by women. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

7 of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall 

8 submit a report to Congress on the results of such study, 

9 which shall include recommendations for improving the 

10 performance of the Federal Government with respect to 

11 the goals referred to in subsection (a). 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Aaron Kenard WESTBROOK

No. 301A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 13, 2018

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Westbrook, Aaron Kenard

Joseph Finarelli, L. Michael Dodd, Special Deputy Attorneys General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *737***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of September 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 12th of September 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of September 2018."
In the MATTER OF: J.D.

No. COA17-954

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

DISMISSED.
Edwin Clary BARTLETT, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Carrie Lyn BARTLETT, Defendant, v. Edwin C. Bartlett, Sr. and Sandra I. Bartlett, Paternal Grandparents and Third Party Defendants.

No. COA17-248

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

AFFIRMED.
Leanne SILVER, Plaintiff, v. CHASE PROPERTIES, INC., Defendant.

No. COA17-1204

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Curtis R. HOLMES v. David G. SHEPPARD and Farm Bureau Insurance of North Carolina, Inc.

No. 374P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Wade E. Byrd, Fayetteville, Attorney at Law, for Holmes, Curtis R.

Mr. Stephen G. Teague, Greensboro, Attorney at Law, for Sheppard, David G.

Ms. Lyn K. Broom, Greensboro, Attorney at Law, for Sheppard, David G.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of November 2017 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Wildon Productions  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof (the  "Report"), the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  January 12, 2007


/s/ Ekaterina Popoff
-------------------------------------
Ekaterina Popoff, President
Chief Executive Officer
REGENCY CENTERS ACQUISITION, LLC v. CRESCENT ACQUISTIONS, LLC

134A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 10, 2018

Mark E. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Tracy S. DeMarco, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Regency Centers Acquisitions, LLC.

Kiran H. Mehta, Sara S. Ash, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, for Crescent Acquisitions, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of August 2018 by Plaintiff to Hold Case in Advance of Settlement:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of August 2018."
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41051 Su m m ar yC al endar

JAM ES C H AR LE S D AV I S , Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant

v. HENDE RS ON C OUNT Y S HER I F F ’ S DE P AR T M ENT ; I RA S P EA RMAN; F NU F UL M ER, Of

f i c e r ; F NU P ARAL I NI , S e r g e a n t ; DO N YAR BR OUGH; L I NDA L N U , D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 6: 08- C V

- 110

B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Ap p e l l a n tJ a m e s Ch a r l e s Da v i s a p p e a l s t h e d i s m i s s a lo f h i s 4 2 U. S

. C. § 198 3 acti on as f

rivol ou s. D avis w as arres t ed f or burgl ary of

a ha bi t ati on af

t er al l e ge dly e nt e r i ng hi s ne i ghb o r ’ s h o us e c ar r yi ng a ham m e ra nd aknife a nd b a r r ic a d i n g h i m self

i n a b a th roo m , w h i l e h oldin g h i s n eigh b or a t kn i fe- p oin t. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

23, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41051

2 A f t er D avis ref

u sed to un dergo a m en t alcom petency exa m i n ati on , t h e di st ri ct
a tt o r n e yre d u c e dth e ch a r g e to th e ft, a n dD a v is p le a d e dg u ilty

. The di s t r i c t c o ur t de t e r m i ne d t hat D av i s ’ s s ui t ag ai ns t l aw e nf o r c e m e nt of f i c i al s, t he s her i f

f ’ s depar t m ent , and hi s nei ghbor s w as bar r ed by He c k v. H u mph rey , 512 U

. S

. 477 , 486

- 87 ( 199 4) , becau se D avis ’ s t h ef tconvi ct i on ha s not been overt u rned or ot h erw ise in vali da t ed. D avis does not di spu t e t h e di st ri ct
c o ur t ’ s ruli ng. I ns t e ad , he a s ks t hi s c o ur tt o e xp ung e hi s r e c o r d, t o pun i s h t he defenda n t s, an d to aw ard dam ages. B ecau se h e does n otadd ress t h e basi s f or t h e di sm i ssalof

h i s su i t , h e h as w aiveda n y argu m en ttha th i s s u i ti s not barred byHe c k. SeeB r e w s t e rv. D r e t ke , __F. 3d __ , N o. 08- 40685, 2009 W L 3738532, at *2 n . 2 ( 5 th C i r. N ov . 10 , 20 0 9 ) (pro se § 1 9 8 3 l i ti ga n t w a ive s i ssu e b y fail i n g to bri ef i t)

. Th e ap pea l i s D ISM ISS E D A S F R IV O L O U S , as i tl acks an y i ssues of
a r g u a b le m e r it. S ee 5 T H C IR
. R

. 42. 2; Ho w ar d v

. Ki ng , 70 7 F

. 2 d21 5 , 22 0 ( 5 th C i r. 198 3)

. D avis ’ s m ot i on s f or app oi n t m en tof

coun selan d cha n ge of ven u e are D E N IE D

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINICIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Julia A. Fratianne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kahiki Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Julia A. Fratianne
----------------------
Julia A. Fratianne, Treasurer and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       18
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the annual report of
White Mountain Titanium Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  September
24, 2009





/s/ Michael P. Kurtanjek


Michael
P. Kurtanjek, President & Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
                        November 16, 2009



/s/ J. Roe BuckleyJ. Roe BuckleyExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
|Household Finance Corporation     |             |              
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | -------------
|Household Automotive Trust 2001-3 |             |              
|                                  |             |              
|                                  |             |              
|Original Principal Class A        |             |              
|Class A-1                         | 200,000,000 |              
|Class A-2                         | 147,000,000 |              
|Class A-3                         | 290,000,000 |              
|Class A-4                         | 183,000,000 |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)   |             |              
|Class A-1                         | 200,000     |              
|Class A-2                         | 147,000     |              
|Class A-3                         | 290,000     |              
|Class A-4                         | 183,000     |              
|                                  |             |              
|                                  |             |              
|Distribution Date                 |             | 2001 Totals  
|Days                              |             |              
|                                  |             |              
|CLASS A                           |             |              
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution  |             | 42,240,643.54
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution   |             | 682,647.89   
|                                  |             |              
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00         
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution   |             | 635,693.33   
|                                  |             |              
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00         
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution   |             | 1,660,088.89 
|                                  |             |              
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00         
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution   |             | 1,243,993.33
# C_2007199EN.01000701.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-327/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/374/EEC - Liability for defective products - Liability of the supplier for a defective product)

(2007/C 199/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Rasmussen, A. Caeiros and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Molde, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Incorrect transposition of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29) — National legislation which makes the distributor of a defective product liable in the same way as the producer

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | By adopting and maintaining in force provisions which make intermediaries in the distribution chain liable under the same conditions as a manufacturer, contrary to Article 3(3) of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By adopting and maintaining in force provisions which make intermediaries in the distribution chain liable under the same conditions as a manufacturer, contrary to Article 3(3) of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | The Kingdom of Denmark is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Kingdom of Denmark is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---