alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  752,000
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           522,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                            106,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,574,000
<PP&E>                               4,608,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       6,723,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                1,373,000
<BONDS>                              1,590,000<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                63,000
<OTHER-SE>                           3,697,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         6,723,000
<SALES>                              2,057,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     9,069,000
<CGS>                                2,270,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     6,846,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,417,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,417,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,417,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.23)

<FN>
<F1> Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
doubtful accounts in the Balance Sheet.

<F2> Property, plant, and equipment are reported net of accumulated depreciation
in the Balance Sheet.

<F3> Excludes current portion.
</FN>



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50025

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL REMEDIOS SALINAS-PORCAYO, also known as

Manuel R. Salinas,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-183-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Remedios

Salinas-Porcayo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2009193EN.01003402.xml

| 15.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/34

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Sergio v Commission

(Case F-137/07) (1)

1

(Staff case - Rights and obligations - Freedom of association - Protocol of Agreement between the Commission and the trade union or professional organisations - Individual decisions on secondment/release from service based on a protocol - Act adversely affecting an official - Locus standi - Official acting on his own account and not on the account of a trade union - Admissibility - Notification of the rejection of the complaint to the applicants’ lawyer - Starting point for the time-limit for bringing an action)

2009/C 193/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Giovanni Sergio (Brussels, Belgium) and Others (represented by: M. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of the ‘Protocol of Agreement between the trade union or professional organisations and the Directorate General for Personnel and Administration (DG ADMIN)’ and the decisions of the appointing authority confirmed by the Protocol of 19 December 2006 and the decision of 14 November 2006 and, second, a claim for damages in the form of a symbolic EUR 1.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Sergio, Mr Blanchard, Mr Marquez-Garcia, Mr Scheuer and Mr Wurzler to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Sergio, Mr Blanchard, Mr Marquez-Garcia, Mr Scheuer and Mr Wurzler to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008, p. 37.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ricky Charles HOWELL

No. 323P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 27, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Ricky Charles Howell, for Howell, Ricky Charles.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 26th of September 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wilkes County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of September 2018."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Wilson, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 555]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered January 22, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 21 years, unanimously affirmed.

*382The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress a statement, since the record supports the court’s findings that the statement was spontaneous and not the product of interrogation requiring *Miranda*warnings. Taken in context, the detective’s declarative statement to defendant, to wit, “You’re in a lot of trouble,” was not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response *(see, People v Rivers,*56 NY2d 476, 480; *People v Ealey,*272 AD2d 269, *lv denied*95 NY2d 865). On the contrary, this comment was part of a conversation, initiated by defendant, in which defendant was expressing his expectation of prompt release from custody and impatiently demanding that the detective accelerate pre-arraignment processing. The detective’s comment was actually part of an effort to discourage defendant’s agitated outbursts *(see, People v Lynes,*49 NY2d 286, 294-295).

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes, since the prior, closely related incident between defendant and the complainant, his former girlfriend, was probative of defendant’s motive to assault her and served as background information concerning their relationship, serving to complete the narrative *(see, People v Angel,*238 AD2d 210, *lv denied*90 NY2d 1009). The court properly found that the evidence was more probative than prejudicial.

The court properly denied defendant’s application for a mistrial concerning testimony about the uncharged crimes that exceeded the boundaries of the court’s prior ruling. The additional details were still more probative than prejudicial. In any event, it would have sufficed under the circumstances to strike the offending testimony and issue curative instructions, but defendant declined the court’s offer to do so.

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur — Williams, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
In the MATTER OF the ESTATE OF Violet P. WARD, Deceased.

No. COA 17-454

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
STATE of North Carolina v. Quintis Travon SPRUIELL

No. 253P09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Spruiell, Quintis Travon.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of January 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of May 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of May 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
STATE of North Carolina v. Adan Gutierrez GARCIA and Sergio Magana Piedra, Defendants.

No. COA17-912

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Maurice Alexander ROBINSON

No. 152P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

M. Gordan Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Maurice Alexander.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 1st of June 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hugo Gittens, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 230]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), rendered July 21, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the second degree and criminal tampering in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of l2/s to 3 Vs years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence warranted the inference that when defendant swung a chair at the officer he did so with intent to cause physical injury. By pushing a metal rod up and down in a subway turnstile’s token slot, defendant engaged in “tampering” within the meaning of Penal Law § 145.15.

The court’s justification charge conveyed the proper standards as applicable to the facts. The court properly refused defendant’s request to instruct the jury concerning justifiable use of force by an initial aggressor after withdrawal from a confrontation, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence that at the time of his use of force defendant had “withdrawn from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal” (Penal Law § 35.15 [1] [b]). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 
1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, effective on the corresponding 
date shown below:

    License Number: 018946NF.
    Name: AMF Global Transportation, Inc.
    Address: 1630 Jarvis Avenue, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007.
    Date Revoked: September 21, 2005.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 016913F.
    Name: America's Cargo Logistics, L.L.C.
    Address: 50 Carnation Avenue, Floral Park, NY 11001.
    Date Revoked: September 3, 2003.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 017466N.
    Name: Compass Shipping, Inc.
    Address: 525 Empire Blvd., Brooklyn, NY 11225.
    Date Revoked: September 21, 2005.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 019041N.
    Name: Grupo Delpa Corp.
    Address: 7225 NW 25th Street, Suite 311, Miami, FL 33122.
    Date Revoked: September 21, 2005.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 012190N.
    Name: Reliable Overseas Shipping & Trading, Inc.
    Address: 239-241 Kingston Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11213.
    Date Revoked: September 21, 2005.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 003028F
    Name: Total Ex-Port of Florida, Inc.
    Address: c/o Total Port Clearance Inc., 10 Fifth Street, Valley 
Stream, NY 11581.
    Date Revoked: September 12, 2005.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 015634N.
    Name: Trans-America Maritime, Inc.
    Address: 8345 NW 74th Street, Miami, FL 33166-2325.
    Date Revoked: September 8, 2005.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-20013 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Cesar  Villavicencio,
CEO and Principal  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cesar Villavicencio
------------------------------------
Cesar Villavicencio
CEO and Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 12, 2004
Order filed May 7, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00252-CV

____________

CHRISTOPHER MULGREW, Appellant

V.

SPECTRASEIS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-41761

ORDER

The notice of appeal in this case was filed March 25, 2013. To date, the 

filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before May 22, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 

fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
# Official Journal L 181/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 494 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 181

English edition

Legislation

Volume 494 July 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 13 March 2006 amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation Nos 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision of 13 March 2006 on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No 55 on provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
   (1) | 53 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 13 March 2006 amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation Nos 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory

1

*

Council Decision of 13 March 2006 on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No 55 on provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
   (1)

53

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1175/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 189 of 21.7.2005) | 111 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1175/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 189 of 21.7.2005)

111

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
In the MATTER OF: A.S., N.S., M.S., N.S., E.S., B.S., Jr., N.T.

No. COA18-120

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 4, 2018

Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurnee, for petitioner-appellee Cumberland County Department of Social Services.

Jeffrey L. Miller, Greenville, for respondent-appellant father.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Raleigh, by Catherine G. Clodfelter, for guardian ad litem.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, the father of the juveniles A.S., N.S., M.S., N.S., E.S., and B.S. Jr., appeals from orders adjudicating the juveniles neglected, granting custody of the juveniles to the Cumberland County Department of Social Services, and denying him visitation.1

Respondent's appellate counsel filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Rule 3.1(d) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, stating that after a conscientious and thorough review of the record on appeal, he was unable to identify any issues of merit on which to base an argument for relief. *See* N.C. R. App. P. 3.1(d). Appellate counsel provided Respondent with copies of the no-merit brief, trial transcript, and record on appeal, and advised him of his right to file a brief with this Court as required by Rule 3.1(d). Respondent did not exercise his right under Rule 3.1(d) to a file a *pro se* brief.

"Rule 3.1(d) does *not* explicitly grant indigent parents the right to receive an *Anders* -type review of the record by our Court, which would allow our Court to consider issues not explicitly raised on appeal." *In re L.V.* , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 814 S.E.2d 928, 929 n.2 (2018). As a result, any arguments challenging the trial court's orders are abandoned on appeal. *See* N.C. R. App. P. 28(b)(6) ("Issues not presented in a party's brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated, will be taken as abandoned."). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's orders.

AFFIRMED.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Panel consisting of Judges DIETZ, TYSON, and MURPHY.

1

The juveniles' mother did not appeal the trial court's orders and is not a party to this appeal. Respondent is not the father of N.T., and N.T.'s father did not appeal the trial court's orders and is also not a party to this appeal. Thus, N.T. is not a subject of this appeal.
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00188-CV

GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant

V.

RIVERWOOD SOLUTIONS, INC., AND LORI AUSTIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-04054-2015

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on December 

19, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### City of Miami Beach, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, *Appellant,*v. The State of Florida, *Appellee.*

Decision Filed April 9, 1928.

*McGaskill & McCasJcill*and *John G. McKay,*for Appellant;

*Vernon Hawthorne,*State Attorney, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the final order of the Circuit Court denying validation of the bonds be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of the opinion in the case of Dade County v. The State, decided March 14, 1928.

Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karl
F. Betz, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

Date: May 6, 2008                      /s/ Karl F. Betz
                                       ----------------
                                       Karl F. Betz
                                       Senior Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                      24