alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20095]



[[Page 58371]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[Docket Number FV-05-309]


United States Standards for Grades of Dewberries and Blackberries

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published a notice 
soliciting comments on a proposal to revise the color requirements in 
the voluntary United States Standards for Grades of Dewberries and 
Blackberries. The Agency has decided not to proceed further with this 
action due to the comments and concerns received from the industry.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 6, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheri L. Emery, Standardization 
Section, Fresh Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 
Independence Avenue, SW., Room 1661 South Building, STOP 0240, 
Washington, DC 20250-0240, Fax (202) 720-8871 or call (202) 720-2185; 
E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3073585542591e755d55424970454354511e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e0d262b3c27600b232b3c370e3b3d2a2f60292138">[email protected]</span></a>. The United States Standards for Grades of 
Dewberries and Blackberries are available either through the address 
cited above or by accessing the Fresh Products Branch Web site at: 
http://www.ams.usda.gov/standards/stanfrfv.htm.

Background

    At a 2003 meeting with the Fruit and Vegetable Industry Advisory 
Committee, AMS was asked to review all the fresh fruit and vegetable 
grade standards for usefulness in serving the industry. AMS had 
identified the United States Standards for Grades of Dewberries and 
Blackberries for a possible revision. The United States Standards for 
Grades of Dewberries and Blackberries were last amended on February 13, 
1928.
    On June 21, 2005, a notice seeking comments on the possible 
revision of the standards to allow for a lesser amount of color or 
varying shades of color was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 
21392) with the comment period ending August 22, 2005.
    Two comments were received from the industry during the official 
period for comment. Both comments received did not support the revision 
of the standards based on color being a factor of the ripening process, 
and the effect that it has on the marketing of dewberries and 
blackberries.
    After reviewing and considering the comments received, the Agency 
has decided not to proceed further with this action.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.

    Dated: October 3, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20095 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 350/2005

of 28 February 2005         

opening an invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   An invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences is hereby opened. The products concerned, the tender submission period, the indicative refund rates and the scheduled quantities are laid down in the Annex hereto.

2.   The licences issued in respect of food aid as referred to in Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 (4) shall not count against the eligible quantities in the Annex hereto.

3.   Notwithstanding Article 5(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001, the term of validity of the A3 licences shall be two months.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 537/2004 (OJ L 86, 24.3.2004, p. 9).

(3)OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2180/2003(OJ L 335, 22.12.2003, p. 1).

(4)OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

INVITATION TO TENDER FOR THE ALLOCATION OF A3 EXPORT LICENCES FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLES (TOMATOES, ORANGES, LEMONS AND APPLES)

----

(1)  The product codes are defined in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1).

(2)  The ‘            A            ’ series destination codes are defined in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87. The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). The other destinations are defined as follows:

----
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I. John B. Wadsworth,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blue Ridge Paper Products Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal  control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 9, 2006

## **/S/ JOHN B. WADSWORTH**John B. WadsworthChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Lister, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/ Michael D. Lister

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Michael D. Lister                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|September 14, 2005
Perrin Q. HENDERSON v. Mary Ward HENDERSON

No. 76P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Rebecca K. Watts, Attorney at Law, Monroe, for Henderson, Mary Ward.

Adam S. Hocutt, Rebecca B. Wofford, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, J. Huntington Wofford, Attorney at Law, for Henderson, Perrin Q.

Rebecca Wofford, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Hughes SPRINGLE

No. COA17-652

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

DISMISSED.
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

41P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Arthur O. Armstrong, for Armstrong, Arthur O.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of June 2018 by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Writ of Mandamus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
In the MATTER OF: B.D.A.I., M.B., M.T., and B.T.

No. COA17-979

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23.02**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

ECB Bancorp, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement(No. 333-77689) on Form S-8 of ECB Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the one-year period ended December 31, 2004,which report appears in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of ECB Bancorp, Inc. 

 

*/s/ KPMG LLP*

 

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 9, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Barry MCPHAUL, Defendant.

No. COA17-942

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 464 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 464

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the limit 
on the amount of certain contributions which may be made to a candidate 
            with respect to an election for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2013

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the limit 
on the amount of certain contributions which may be made to a candidate 
            with respect to an election for Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO 
              INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES.

    (a) Reduction in Limit.--Section 315(a)(1)(A) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(1)(A)) is amended by 
striking ``$2,000'' and inserting ``$1,000''.
    (b) Application of Indexing.--
            (1) In general.--Section 315(c)(1)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
        441a(c)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``after 2002'' and 
        inserting ``after 2002 (or, in the case of the limitation 
        established under subsection (a)(1)(A), after 2016)''.
            (2) Determination of base period.--Section 315(c)(2)(B) of 
        such Act (2 U.S.C. 441a(c)(2)(B)) is amended--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (ii)--
                            (i) by striking ``(a)(1)(A),'', and
                            (ii) by striking the period at the end and 
                        inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(iii) for purposes of subsection (a)(1)(A), 
                calendar year 2015.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring after December 2014.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the amended item 3 on Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/  Alex Kam
--------------------------
Alex Kam
Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 20, 2006


/s/  Pan-Rong Liu
--------------------------
Pan-Rong Liu
Chief Financial Officer
Date: October 20, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Madison Avenue
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Opinion issued November 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00798-CV

———————————

YVETTE R. MARSH-JOHNSON AND CLEOTHA ETIENNE, Appellants

V.

HORACE MANN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-46804

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Yvette R. Marsh-Johnson and Cleotha Etienne, have filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We 

dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
COURTNEY NC LLC v. BALDWIN

219P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2017

Monette Baldwin, for Baldwin, Monette.

A. Bartlett White, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephanie D'Atri, Attorney at Law, for Courtney NC, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of October 2017 by Defendant for Deferral of Fees:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of October 2017."

Beasley, J. and Morgan, J. recused
Robert Andrew BARTLETT, Sr. v. Eric A. HOOKS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety

No. 236P06-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 27, 2018

Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., for Robert A. Bartlett, Sr., for State.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Hooks, Erik A. (N.C.D.P.S. Secretary).

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 27th of September 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Orange County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of September 2018."
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4443 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4443 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUAN MARIEL ALCANTARA POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New 

5 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel 

11 Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Bradley M. Colby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November
23, 2009





/s/ Bradley M.
Colby





Bradley
M. Colby,


President
and Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Raymond REED

No. COA17-1180

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 10.36  FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE MCLEODUSA
INCORPORATED EMPLOYMENT
SECURITY SEVERANCE PLAN MARCH 25,
2005  1.             Section 1(d) of the Plan is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety, as follows:  Change in
Control means the consummation of the first to occur of the following events:
(i) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company; (ii) a merger, consolidation,
or reorganization of the Company with one or more other entities in which the
Company is not the surviving entity; (iii) a sale of substantially all of the
assets of the Company; (iv) any transaction (including, without limitation, a
merger, consolidation or reorganization in which the Company is the surviving
entity) that results in any person or entity (other than persons who are
holders of stock of the Company at the time the Plan was approved by the
stockholders and other than an Affiliate) owning 51 percent or more of the
combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company; or (v) a
recapitalization or restructuring of the Companys material debt or equity,
including, without limitation, a retirement of indebtedness involving the
issuance by the Company of equity securities in consideration for the
retirement of such indebtedness or a material modification of the terms of such
indebtedness.   2.             Except as set forth above, the Plan is hereby ratified
and confirmed in all respects.    1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board; Public 
Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small Business 
Development Centers, National Advisory Board will be hosting a public 
meeting via conference call to discuss such matters that may be 
presented by members, and the staff of the U.S. Small Business 
Administration, or interested others. The conference call will be held 
on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 at 1 p.m. eastern standard time.
    Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must 
contact Erika Fischer, Senior Program Analyst, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Office of Small Business Development Centers, 409 3rd 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, telephone (202) 205-7045 or fax 
(202) 481-0681.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19980 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P