alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 24-25, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Baltimore Inner Harbor, 300 Light Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Patricia A. Haggerty, PhD, Section Chief, Clinical Studies and Training Scientific Review Group Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7194, MSC 7924, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0288,                         *haggertp@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-20222  Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Environmental Control Corp. (formerly
Boss Minerals, Inc.) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  May 19, 2006


/s/  Terence Mugford
--------------------------------------------
Terence Mugford, Principal Financial Officer
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00359-CR

BENJAMIN ROBERT BARRAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1401264

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was indicted for fraudulent use of identifying information. 

Pursuant to a charge bargain, the State agreed to dismiss four other charges in 

exchange for appellant’s guilty plea to the indicted charge. The trial court 

sentenced appellant to twenty years in prison. Appellant filed a timely notice of 

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

Because this is a charge-bargain case, appellant has the right to appeal under 
2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) only: (A) those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after receiving the 

trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 340–41 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2009); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2003) (holding that charge bargain that “effectively puts a cap on 

punishment” is a bargain governed by rule of appellate procedure 25.2(a)(2)). 

The record does not reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any 

pretrial motions that could be appealed. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction over 

appellant’s appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Donovan

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Control Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Environmental Control Corp. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 17, 2010 | /s/ Gary Bishop                                                |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Gary Bishop                                                    |
|                | Chief Financial Officer                                        |
|                | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                | Environmental Control Corp.                                    |
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 
 BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. 
 2006 Share Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) 
 Agreement Regarding Restricted Stock Units 

Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the Plan shall have the same defined meanings in this Agreement Regarding Restricted Stock Units.

 NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS 
 You have been granted Restricted Stock Units related to the Common Stock of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, as follows: 

Grant Number: [                    ]

 Grant Date:
[                    ] 

Total Number of Units
Granted:                [                    ] 

Vesting Schedule: 
 The Restricted Stock Units granted under this award, shall vest conditioned on your continuous service to the Company on the following schedule: 

[insert vesting schedule] 
 Upon vesting, the units will automatically be converted into shares of the Company’s Common Stock on a 1:1 basis, subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan. 

Tax Implications: 
 When you vest in units, the applicable employment tax and withholding requirements (if any) will be satisfied on a “net settlement” basis, meaning that the number of shares that you receive due
to vesting will represent the difference between the total number of shares in which you vest and a number of shares having a fair market value sufficient to pay the minimum required statutory withholding due for such taxes. 

Agreed and Accepted by: 
  

							
	  
	 		  	  
	  	
	Name:	 		  	Date:	  	


  
 - 5 -
#### Ricardo FERREIRA, Appellant, v. Susanna TIMOR, f/k/a Susanna Ferreira, Appellee.

No. 3D03-646.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 13, 2003.

Ricardo Ferreira, in proper person.

Elena De Socarraz, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Braznell v. Braznell,*140 Fla. 192, 191 So. 457 (1939).
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-27-2006

Joseph v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-1047

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Joseph v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 137.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/137
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

 November 16, 2006

 

 Nos. 05-1047 & 05-2889 

 

 Warren Hilarion Eusta Joseph, Petitioner

v.

 Attorney Gen USA, Respondent 

 (Agency No. A41-090-468) 

 

Present: SMITH, WEIS, ROTH, Circuit Judges

 1. Motion by Petitioner to Amend Opinion.

 

 

 /s/ Carmella L. Wells 

Opinion & Judgment filed 10/02/06 Carmella L. Wells 267-299-4928

 Mandate to issue on 11/24/06 Case Manager

 

 

 O R D E R 

The foregoing motion is granted. 

The opinion filed on October 2, 2006 is amended as follows: 

On Page 9, Line 4 delete the words “for twenty years.”

By the Court,

s/ WEIS 

United States Circuit Judge

Dated: November 27, 2006
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4548 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to include programs that teach technology 

literacy in any job training program for ex-offenders offered under the 

Workforce Investment Act of 1998. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2014 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to include programs that 

teach technology literacy in any job training program 

for ex-offenders offered under the Workforce Investment 

Act of 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Re-Integration of Ex5 Offenders Through Technology Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4548 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF TECHNOLOGY LITERACY IN EX-OF2 FENDER JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

3 The Secretary of Labor shall include programs that 

4 teach technology literacy in any job training program for 

5 ex-offenders offered under the Workforce Investment Act 

6 of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120692),2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782) ,3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211),4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282) ,6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592),7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571) of Liberty Property Trust and
Liberty Property Limited Partnership, and8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-148614),9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-14139),10)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32244) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,11)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-53297),12)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63115),13)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37218),14)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45032),15)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62504) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,16)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62506) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,17)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63494),18)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63978),19)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-91702),20)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107482),21)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-108040),22)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-114609),23)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-118994),24)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130948),25)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125572), and26)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-122365) of Liberty Property Trust and in the
related Prospectuses, and27)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118995) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan of our reports dated February 26, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liberty Property
Trust, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Liberty
Property Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2007.
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Debra JONES, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO COMPANY and Joshua Hodgin, Defendants.

No. COA 18-96

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1385

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ulises Alvarado

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Western

 ____________

Submitted: June 23, 2021

Filed: June 29, 2021

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Ulises Alvarado was convicted in 2020 of failing to register as a sex offender

and was subject to supervised release after completing his sentence. His first term of

supervised release was revoked because he failed to comply with a residential reentry

center’s rules, and he was sentenced to four months in prison with supervised release

to follow. This court affirmed the revocation. United States v. Alvarado, No.
20-2750, 2021 WL 2102595, at *1-2 (8th Cir. May 25, 2021) (per curiam). Alvarado

now appeals the nine-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed after his

supervised release was revoked for the second time, based on his failure to follow his

probation officer’s directives and the residential reentry center’s rules. His counsel

has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the sentence is unreasonable,

particularly due to the technical nature of the violations and Alvarado’s physical

injuries.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its

wide discretion in revoking Alvarado’s supervised release and sentencing him. See

United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of

review). The district court did not make a “reflexive reaction to an accumulation of

technical violations,” given its reasoned finding that Alvarado exhibited a continued

unwillingness to comply with rules and directives. See United States v. Melton, 666

F.3d 513, 516 (8th Cir. 2012) (reiterating that actions indicating “a persistent and

‘pervasive unwillingness’ to comply with court orders and the orders of a reentry

center are not technical violations and may warrant the revocation of a supervised

release”). The record also reflects that the district court sufficiently considered the

relevant statutory sentencing factors, including Alvarado’s alleged physical injuries,

and did not give significant weight to an improper factor or commit a clear error of

judgment when imposing a sentence below the statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e), (e)(3); Miller, 557 F.3d at 915-18; United States v. Keating, 579 F.3d 891,

893 (8th Cir. 2009) (explaining that the district court is presumed to have considered

factors on which it heard argument). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw.

______________________________

1The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation in the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Control Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Environmental Control Corp. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 16, 2010 |                                                           |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                           |
|                   | /s/ Gary Bishop                                                |
|                   | Gary Bishop                                                    |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer                                        |
|                   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                   | Environmental Control Corp.                                    |
CROWELL v. CROWELL

31A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 26, 2018

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, for Crowell, Andrea Kirby.

Amy Simpson Fiorenza, Attorney at Law, for Crowell, William Worrell.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 23rd of September 2018 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of September 2018."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 20th day of November 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4663 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4663

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a permanent 
         exclusion of all gain on certain small business stock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

  Ms. Kosmas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a permanent 
         exclusion of all gain on certain small business stock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhancing Investment in Small 
Businesses Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXCLUSION OF ALL GAIN ON CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS 
              STOCK.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating partial exclusion for gain from certain 
small business stock) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Exclusion.--In the case of a taxpayer other than a 
corporation, gross income shall not include any gain from the sale or 
exchange of qualified small business stock held for more than 5 
years.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1(h) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (4) by amending subparagraph (A) 
                to read as follows:
                    ``(A) collectibles gain, over''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (7).
            (2) Section 57(a) of such Code is amended by striking 
        paragraph (7).
            (3) The heading for section 1202 of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``partial''.
            (4) The item relating to section 1202 in the table of 
        sections for part I of subchapter P of chapter 1 of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``Partial exclusion'' and inserting 
        ``Exclusion''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to stock acquired after February 17, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. David Woodard DANIEL

164A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2018

Ashleigh P. Dunston, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher W. Brooks, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jay Vannoy, Attorney at Law, for Daniel, David Woodard.

*581The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 26th of June 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of June 2018."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of WPT Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott A. Friedman,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 9, 2008 |   | /s/Scott A. Friedman    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   | Scott A. Friedman       |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----