alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                          Office of Thrift Supervision

                                 Report H-(b)11

Holding Company Docket Number H-3633
                              H-3632

      Annual Report:    For the Fiscal Year Ended ____________

                        OR

      Current Report:   For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004

                        OR

                        For the Event on _____________________

Filed Pursuant to Section 10(b)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, as amended, and
12 C.F.R. Section 584.1 (a).

First Federal Financial Services, Inc.
First Federal Financial Services, MHC
-------------------------------------
Name of Holding Company

300 St. Louis Street
Edwardsville, Illinois 62025
----------------------------
Address of Executive Office

Name: Larry W. Mosby, President and CEO
      First Federal Financial Services, Inc.
Telephone Number: (618) 656-6200
Mailing Address: 300 St. Louis Street
                 Edwardsville, Illinois 62025
E-Mail Address: lmosby@1stfedsavings.com

of the Individual To Whom Communications are to be sent

<PAGE>

Certification

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 10(b)(2) of the HOLA, as amended, the
Holding Company making this Report has caused this filing to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized.

First Federal Financial Services, Inc.
First Federal Financial Services, MHC
-------------------------------------
Name of Holding Company

The undersigned principal executive or principal financial officer of the
Holding Company making this Current Report acknowledges and certifies that the
information contained herein, including forms or exhibits, has been carefully
reviewed, and that such information is true, correct and complete.


Larry W. Mosby
--------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
-------------------------------------
Name and title of officer signing on behalf of the Holding Company

Attest:


Linda Werner
------------
Secretary
---------
Name and title

Date: November 5, 2004
Michael C. Piro v. Rebecca Hadden McKeever, L.C.S.W.; Cynthia L. Sapp, Ph.D.; Karen Barry, M.F.T., LMFT; and Davidson Counseling Associates

No. 93A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 21, 2016

Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, Raleigh, by Tobias S. Hampson and Michelle D. Connell, for plaintiff-appellant.

Epstein Law Firm, PLLC, by Andrew J. Epstein, for defendant-appellee Rebecca Hadden McKeever, L.C.S.W.

McGuireWoods LLP, by Mark E. Anderson and Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for National Association of Social Workers, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

In this case we consider whether plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleged claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because the members of the Court are equally divided as to both issues, the holding of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands affirmed without precedential value. *See, e.g.* , *State v. Long* , 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); *State v. Greene* , 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

ESTATE OF: ISABEL WILNER, DECEASED

PETITION OF: LINDA BAKER : : : : : : : No. 390 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issue is:
Whether this Court should accept jurisdiction to determine if it should overrule the rigid application of the irrebutable “two witness” rule, particularly in cases where a disinterested scrivener, an officer of the [c]ourt, testifies credibly concerning the contents of the [w]ill and where[,] based on the overwhelming evidence in the case as determined by the trier of fact[,] application of the rule would create the very injustice that it was intended to avoid[.] Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File a Reply to Answer to address her standing in this matter is DENIED , as respondent waived the issue of petitioner’s standing by failing to raise it in the Superior Court. SeePa.R.A.P. 302(a); In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh , 913 A.2d 178, 181 n.6 (Pa. 2006) (noting standing in Pennsylvania is nonjurisdictional and therefore waivable (citation omitted)).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1061

___________

Roderick Braswell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

F. Brown, Captain, East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, Arkansas Department * [UNPUBLISHED]

of Correction; J. Banks, Assistant *

Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, *

Arkansas Department of Correction; *

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *

Department of Correction; Lt. McGee, *

Arkansas Department of Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 21, 2000

 Filed: April 25, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-

Roderick Braswell, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the District Court’s1 dismissal

of his civil rights action following an evidentiary hearing. After careful review of the

record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the District Court did not err in

dismissing Braswell’s complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District

Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 434 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 

discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2013 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce 

permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 

5 Tax Freedom Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

7 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

8 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

10 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 434 IH

1 striking ‘‘taxes during the period beginning November 1, 

2 2003, and ending November 1, 2014:’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘taxes:’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Katlyn Nichelle MILLIGAN

No. COA18-307

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.10
  CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Dr. Warwick Board, Ph. D, P. Geo. and report, NI43-101 Technical Report on the Pirquitas Mine, Jujuy Province, Argentina  dated December 23, 2011 (the “Report”), and the information contained in my Report, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 27th day of February, 2013.
 
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 
 /s/ Dr. Warwick Board
 Dr. Warwick Board, Ph. D, P. Geo.
  CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Bruce Kennedy, P. Eng. and report, NI43-101 Technical Report on the Pirquitas Mine, Jujuy Province, Argentina  dated December 23, 2011 (the “Report”), and the information contained in my Report, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 5th day of March, 2013.
 
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 
 /s/ Bruce Kennedy
 Bruce Kennedy, P. Eng.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2623

STUART HILL; VICKI HILL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus STEVEN DUNN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99- 89-AMD) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stuart Hill, Vicki Hill, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Stuart and Vicki Hill appeal the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the appellee on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint alleging malicious prosecution and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hill v. Dunn , No. CA-99-89-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 8 & 22, 1999). We deny Dunn’s motion to strike the appellants’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ron OLIVER v. CAL DIVE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

No. 2003-C-1230.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Cal Dive International, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 108,141; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 1122.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.

VICTORY, J., would grant the writ.

WEIMER, J., would grant the writ.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        to
        my knowledge that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
        Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        upon request.
 
 
 /s/
        MARK GUSTAFSON
 Mark
        Gustafson
 President
        (Principal Executive Officer)
 December
        15, 2005
William S. COFFEY, Plaintiff, v. Kathryn P. COFFEY, Defendant.

No. COA17-1243

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

REVERSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Melanie Lynn PURSLEY

No. COA 17-830

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 04, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 04, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A1852. EMMALANE FARMS, INC. d/b/a NEWTON RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY v. C. ASHTON BLOUNT, III INSURANCE AGENCY LLC et al.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
STATE v. Wali Farad Muhammad BILAL

292P03-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Wali Farad M. Bilal, for Bilal, Wali Farad Muhammad.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of N. C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of October 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4544 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4544

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow a deduction for 
      any fine paid by an owner of professional sports franchise.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2014

Mr. Cardenas (for himself, Mr. Grijalva, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Rush, Mr. 
Vargas, Mr. Garcia, and Mr. Ruiz) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow a deduction for 
      any fine paid by an owner of professional sports franchise.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Penalizing Taxpayers for Sports 
Owner Fouls Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR FINES PAID BY OWNER OF PROFESSIONAL 
              SPORTS FRANCHISE.

    (a) In General.--Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsection (q) as subsection (r) and by 
inserting after subsection (p) the following new subsection:
    ``(q) Fines and Penalties Paid by Owners of Professional Sports 
Franchises.--In the case of an individual who owns (directly or 
indirectly) a professional sports franchise, no deduction shall be 
allowed under subsection (a) for any fine or similar penalty paid to 
the professional sports league or association of which the franchise is 
a member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
CROWELL v. CROWELL

31A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Crowell, Andrea Kirby.

Amy Simpson Fiorenza, Attorney at Law, for Crowell, William Worrell.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of July 2018 by Defendant to dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
2003 OK JUD ETH 1

#### JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2003-1.

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.

March 14, 2003.

FACT SITUATION:

T0 The District Judges of an Administrative District appointed a practicing attorney to the office of Special District Judge to fill a position vacated by a Special Judge upon his assuming the office of District Judge.

11 The lawyer, in anticipation of the assumption of said office, closed her law practice.

T2 Subsequently, the Supreme Court directed that no non-elected positions should be filled until further direction of the Supreme Court, due to budget shortfalls, specifically referring to vacancies occurring in Spe*280cial Judges' offices, as well as other vacated positions.

18 By reason of the Supreme Court's directive, the lawyer has not been sworn in and assumed the office of Special Judge.

QUESTIONS:

4 May the attorney reopen her law practice or take other legal employment until funding becomes available allowing her to be sworn in and assume the office of Special District Judge?

£5 Is she a candidate for election or appointment to judicial office so as to invoke the provisions of Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct?

T6 WE ANSWER: Yes to both questions. DISCUSSION:

7 The only provision of the Code of Judicial Conduct that applies to a candidate or applicant for election or appointment to judicial office is Canon 5, which directs that judicial candidates should refrain from inappropriate political activity as set forth in the Canon. The other Canons apply only to a judge who has been sworn in and taken office. We conclude that nothing in the Canons prevents the party making the inquiry from re-opening her practice or taking other employment in the legal field until such time as she may be sworn in.

18 With regard to the second question, it would appear that when the lawyer made application for appointment to the office, and was in fact appointed by the appointing authority, the lawyer became a party subject to Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and should adhere to the provisions of that Canon.

T9 ROBERT L. BAILEY, Chairman, ROBERT D. SIMMS, Vice Chairman, MILTON C. CRAIG, Secretary.
EXHIBIT 24





POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Valley Financial Corporation, a Virginia corporation (“Valley”), does hereby constitute and appoint Ellis L. Gutshall and Kimberly B. Snyder, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), his true and lawful Attorneys in Fact and Agents for him and on his behalf and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities and particularly as an officer and/or director of Valley, to sign, execute and affix his seal thereto and file any of the documents referred to below:





Annual Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, together with all exhibits and any and all documents required to be filed with respect thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and all other appropriate regulatory authorities;





granting unto said Attorneys and each of them full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to effectuate the same as fully, to all intents and purposes, as he himself might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and affirming all that said Attorneys in Fact and Agents or each of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





WITNESS the signatures and seals of the undersigned this 27th day of January, 2011.





/s/ Mason Haynesworth (Seal)
/s/ George W. Logan (Seal)/s/ Samuel L. Lionberger, Jr. (Seal)
/s/ Anna L. Lawson (Seal)/s/ John W. Starr (Seal)
/s/ Abney S. Boxley, III (Seal)/s/ James S. Frantz, Jr. (Seal)
/s/ Edward B. Walker (Seal)/s/ Eddie F. Hearp (Seal)
/s/ Ellis L. Gutshall (Seal)/s/ Barbara B. Lemon (Seal)
/s/ Geoffrey Ottaway (Seal)/s/ Ward W. Stevens (Seal)
/s/ William D. Elliot (Seal)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chad DeGroot, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Metasun Enterprises, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metasun Enterprises, Inc. for the nine month period ended October 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metasun Enterprises, Inc.

Dated: December 15, 2004

/s/ Chad DeGroot				Chad DeGroot
President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, 
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Antonio MEANS

No. 266P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2018

Mr. Charles Antonio Means, for Means, Charles Antonio

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ms. Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 22nd of August 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Johnston County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of August 2018."
In the MATTER OF: J.H.S. and G.A.B.

No. COA 17-628

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, SBIR Topics 200 (Phase II) and 201 (Phase II),
    Date: October 19, 2005.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Joyce C. Pegues, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., 7149, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-1286, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#700015170515031a301d11191c5e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="611104061404120b210c00080d4f0f08094f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 21, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-19382 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>