alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
To Fixed Charges
 ThreeMonthsEnded
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,March 31, 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Net income
    
    $
    7,434
    
    
    $
    27,543
    
    
    $
    26,816
    
    
    $
    32,494
    
    
    $
    581
    
    
    $
    2,670Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
    
    
    427
    
    
    
    680
    
    
    
    740
    
    
    
    1,994
    
    
    
    758
    
    
    
    Income from equity investee
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (894
    )
    
    
    (2,737
    )7,861
    
    
    
    28,223
    
    
    
    27,556
    
    
    
    34,488
    
    
    
    445
    
    
    
    (67
    )Add:Total fixed charges (per below)
    
    
    3,799
    
    
    
    14,815
    
    
    
    11,324
    
    
    
    2,279
    
    
    
    1,665
    
    
    
    1,657Distributed income of equity investee
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,487Total earnings
    
    $
    11,660
    
    
    $
    43,038
    
    
    $
    38,880
    
    
    $
    36,767
    
    
    $
    2,110
    
    
    $
    4,077Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    3,358
    
    
    $
    13,056
    
    
    $
    9,633
    
    
    $
    697
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Estimate of interest within rental expense(1)
    
    
    441
    
    
    
    1,759
    
    
    
    1,691
    
    
    
    1,582
    
    
    
    1,665
    
    
    
    1,657Total fixed charges
    
    $
    3,799
    
    
    $
    14,815
    
    
    $
    11,324
    
    
    $
    2,279
    
    
    $
    1,665
    
    
    $
    1,657Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.07
    
    
    
    2.91
    
    
    
    3.43
    
    
    
    16.13
    
    
    
    1.27
    
    
    
    2.46
 
 (1)
    
    Represents 30% of the total operating lease rental expense which is that portion deemed to be
interest.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00238

- CV

TRISUN HEALTHCARE, LLC AND TRISUN CARE CENTER RIVER RIDGE v. MINERVA LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF HUMBERTO LOPEZ, DECEASED, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF HUMBERTO LOPEZ, DECEASED, AN D ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF HUMBERTO LOPEZ, DECEASED

On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012

- DCV

- 2953

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 3, 201 4
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6157

RAYON LAVELLE PORK , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , Senior District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00949

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : June 14, 2018 Decided: June 19, 2018

Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Rayon Lavelle Pork, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rayon Lavelle Pork seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of t he denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the c onstitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disp ositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pork has not made the requisite showin g. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service

          - 30 CFR Parts 250 and 256
          - RIN 1010-AD16

# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

# ACTION:

Final rule; delay of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

MMS is delaying until January 1, 2006, the effective date of a rule that will implement fees to offset MMS's costs of providing certain services related to its mineral programs. This delay is necessary because of damage caused in the New Orleans area by Hurricane Katrina and subsequent flooding. The delay will provide relief to the government and the oil and gas industry as they recover from this disaster.

# DATES:

The effective date of the rule amending 30 CFR Parts 250 and 256 published at 70 FR 49871, August 25, 2005 is delayed until January 1, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela Mazzullo, Offshore Minerals Management (OMM) Budget Office at (703) 787-1691.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The rule published August 25, 2005, requires MMS to develop additional procedures that MMS will provide to the oil and gas industry in the form of a Notice to Lessees. The primary office responsible for developing those procedures, the MMS Gulf of Mexico Regional Office in New Orleans, Louisiana, has been closed since Hurricane Katrina and the flooding that followed that disaster. Moreover, many of the lessees and operators subject to the rule are similarly engaged in the restoration of normal operations following Hurricane Katrina. Lessees and operators will be making changes in their own procedures to comply with the rule. Lessees and operators whose operations have been interrupted as a result of the hurricane may not be able to make these changes until normal operations resume. Accordingly, the Department of the Interior is postponing the effective date of the final rule until January 1, 2006.

Dated: September 20, 2005.

Rebecca W. Watson,

Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals Management.

[FR Doc. 05-19223 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
#### Tina Renee RICE, Respondent, v. Earl Garnier RICE, Jr., Appellant.

No. ED 80921.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 8, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 10, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

Bradley S. Dede, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Gordon R. Upchurch, Union, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Rice (hereinafter, “Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment of dissolution from Tina Rice (hereinafter, ‘Wife”). Husband brings several points on appeal challenging the division and valuation of marital and separate property and the awarding of child custody to Wife. Wife filed a motion to dismiss Husband’s appeal for failure to comply with the briefing requirements set forth in Rule 84.04 which was taken with the case.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the trial court committed no error. *422
      *Sanders v. Sanders,*933 S.W.2d 898, 899 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Wife’s motion taken with the case is denied. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Della ANDERSON, et al. v. Dr. Jacqueline CLEGGETT-LUCAS, et al.

No. 2003-CC-0489.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Cleggett-Lucas, Jacqueline Dr.; J.C.L. Enterprises L.L.C.; Continental Casualty Company; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 02-7838; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-2743.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.

WEIMER, J., would grant the writ.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We have issued our report  dated  January 15,  1999,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedules  incorporated  by reference or
included in the Annual Report of TF Financial  Corporation  and  Subsidiaries on
Form  10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  1998.  We hereby  consent  to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the  Registration  Statements of TF
Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-87176, effective
December  7, 1994,  File No.  333-09235,  effective  July 31,  1996 and File No.
333-27085, effective May 14, 1997).


/s/Grant Thornton LLP
---------------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1999
NOONSOB v. STATE OF NC

131P16-8

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Somchoi Noonsab, For Noonsab, Somchoi

Mr. Somchoi Noorsob, For Noorsob, Somchoi *241The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of April 2018 by Defendant for Review of Constitutional Questions:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Unitholders of Regency Centers, L.P.

and
the Board of Directors of

Regency Centers Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-58966) on Form S-3 of Regency Centers, L.P. of our reports dated March 14, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers, L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners capital and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers, L.P.

|            
|------------
|            
|            
|            
|/s/ KPMG LLP
|            
|            
|            
|            
|            
|            

Jacksonville, Florida

March 14, 2005
#### CUB CADET CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, Appellant, v. BLAKEWOOD EQUIPMENT SALES, INC., a Florida corporation, Stephen Blakewood, an individual; and Sally Blakewood, an individual, Appellees.

No. 1D02-2513.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 2003.

*866Sonya H. Hoener of Marks Gray, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

John F. Roscow, III of Scruggs & Carmichael, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Gulf Landings Assoc., Inc. v. Hershberger,*845 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); *Wentworth v. Johnson,*845 So.2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
No. 17,443.

#### Capitol Fixture & Supply Company *v.*Abe Nieman.

(280 P. [2d] 1119)

Decided March 7, 1955.

Mr. Louis E. Gelt, Mr. Sidney H. Grossman, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Leo Sanders Moses, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the national cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, NHSU, London, United Kingdom has been added as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
21, 2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 29, 2004 (69 FR 69395).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1973 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 10.2


 


INTERCREDITOR AND PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT


 


Agreement made and entered into this day by
and between NORTHEAST LCD CAPITAL, LLC, a Maine limited liability company ("Lender" and “Subsequent Lender”)
and LUCID, INC., a New York corporation ("Borrower"). In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree
as follows:


 


1.        Reference is made to a certain Loan And Security Agreement
dated as of July 5, 2012, executed between Borrower and Lender (the "Security Agreement"). Said Security Agreement secures
an original principal amount of $7,000,000.00.


 


2.        Provision “2.2 ("Term Loans") (b)”
of the Security Agreement provides that additional lenders ("Subsequent Lenders") may make additional loans ("Subsequent
Term Loans") to Borrower. Each Subsequent Lender of a Subsequent Term Loan shall become a party to the Security Agreement
as a Subsequent Lender thereunder.


 


3.        Northeast LCD Capital, LLC, as a Subsequent Lender, is
making a Subsequent Term Loan to Borrower in the amount of $5,000,000 as evidenced by a Term Note dated May 20, 2013. Pursuant
to this Intercreditor and Participation Agreement, the $5,000,000.00 Subsequent Term Loan shall be included in and secured by the
Security Agreement and all provisions thereof apply to this Subsequent Term Loan.


 


4.        The parties agree that any Intercreditor Agreement shall
be at the sole discretion of Northeast LCD Capital, LLC and it shall have the sole discretion regarding collection and realization
on all collateral pledge to secure the two loan positions.


 


In witness whereof, the undersigned sets their
hands and seals of this 20 day of May, 2013.


 


	     	 	LUCID, INC 

    ("Borrower")   
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Richard J. Pulsifer	 	By:	/s/ L. Michael Hone
	Witness	 	 	L. Michael Hone, its CEO 

    Thereunto duly authorized
	 	 	 	 
		 	NORTHEAST LCD CAPITAL, LLC
    
 ("Lender" and "Subsequent Lender")  
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Scott Edmunds	 	By:	/s/ C. Wesley Crowell 
	Witness   	 	 	C. Wesley Crowell 

    Its Manager, Thereunder Duly Authorized
NC NAACP v. MOORE, et al.

261P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2018

Kimberley Hunter, Attorney at Law, David L. Neal, Attorney at Law, Mary MacLean Asbill, Attorney at Law, Brooks Rainey Pearson, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, Daryl V. Atkinson, Attorney at Law, Leah J. Kang, Attorney at Law, for NC NAACP.

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Amar Majmundar, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Special Deputy Attorney General, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Moore, Tim, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for North Carolina Professors of Constitutional Law.

*592The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2018 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2018."
#### MURPHY OIL, U.S.A., INC. v. WALWORTH COMPANY, et al.

No. 2003-CC-2032.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 17, 2003.

In re Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc. et al.;— Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. *61377132; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-0996.

Denied.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kasey Anderson Benson , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00227

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

2229396 ). Panel cons ists of Chief Justice

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Kasey Anderson Benson , has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 3 , 2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Deb ra K. Autrey , Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. William E. LONG

No. COA17-1291

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

NO ERROR.
#### Michael O'NEILL and Marilyn O'Neill v. DIXIE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION and JBFH Corporation.

No. 2003-OC-1560.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 12, 2003.

In re JBFH Corporation; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 470,349; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002-CA-2281.

Denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth James ROUSE

No. 371P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

W. Michael Spivey, Attorney at Law, for Rouse, Kenneth James.

Victoria Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of November 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Jackson, J. recused
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 2.1

                              ARTICLES OF MERGER

                                      OF

                           CLEAN TOWEL SERVICE, INC.

                                     INTO

                     COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.

To the Secretary of State
State of Georgia

     Pursuant to the provisions of the Georgia Business Corporation Code
governing the merger of a domestic wholly-owned subsidiary business corporation
into its foreign parent business corporation, the foreign parent business
corporation hereinafter named does hereby adopt the following Articles of
Merger.

     FIRST:     The name of the subsidiary corporation, which is a business
     -----
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, is Clean Towel
Service, Inc.

     SECOND:   The name of the parent corporation, which is a business
     ------
corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, is Coyne
International Enterprises Corp.

     THIRD:    The number of outstanding shares of Clean Towel Services, Inc. is
     -----
4000, all of which are of one class, and all of which are owned by Coyne
International Enterprises Corp.

     FOURTH:   Attached hereto is the plan of Merger for merging Clean Towel
     ------
Service, Inc. into Coyne International Enterprises Corp. as approved by
resolution of the Board of Directors of Coyne International Enterprises
Corp.


<PAGE>

     FIFTH:  Coyne International Enterprises Corp., in its capacity as the
     -----
holder of all of the outstanding shares of Clean Towel Service, Inc., waived the
mailing of a copy of the Plan of Merger to Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
otherwise provided for under the provisions of Section 14-2-1104 of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code.

     SIXTH:  The laws of the jurisdiction of organization of Coyne
     -----
International Enterprises Corp. permit a merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary
business corporation of another jurisdiction into a parent business corporation
of the jurisdiction of organization of Coyne International Enterprises Corp.,
and the merger of Clean Towel Service, Inc. into Coyne International Enterprises
Corp, is in compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction of organization of
Coyne International Enterprises Corp.

     SEVENTH:  Shareholder approval was not required.
     -------

     EIGHTH:   This Article constitutes an undertaking by the corporation that
     -----
the request for publication of a notice of filing these Articles of Merger and
payment therefor will be made as required by subsection  (b) of Section
14-2-1105.1 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code.


Executed on this 22/nd/ day of October, 1998.


                              COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.

                                     /s/ Alexandra Pobedinsky
                              BY:   ------------------------------
                                    Alexander Pobedinsky, Secretary



                                       2
John COOK, Plaintiff, v. Diana COOK, Defendant.

No. COA17-359

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.