alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2002 OK JUD ETH 2.

#### JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION.

No. 2002-2.

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.

Jan. 25, 2002.

*279QUESTION 1: May a judge with Drug Court responsibilities participate as an applicant, or by authorizing an entity to apply for grant funding for the administrative support of State Drug Courts established and operational on or before July 1, 2001, through the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.

SPECIFIC FACTS: The fund from which the grant would come are funds appropriated by the Legislature of the State of Oklahoma for use by the Drug Courts established and operational on or before July 1, 2001, the appropriation was made to the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, earmarked for use by Drug Courts, and the department has solicited a funding application from those Drug Courts.

WE ANSWER: YES.

"A judge may serve as a member, officer, director, trustee or non-legal advisor of an organization or governmental agency devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of Canon 4(C)(8): justice ...

> (b) A judge as an officer, director, trustee or non-legal advisor, or as a member or otherwise: ...

> () may assist such an organization in planning fund-raising and may participate in the management and investment of the organization's funds, but shall not personally participate in the solicitation of funds or other fund-raising activities ..."

Canon 4: "A Judge Should So Conduct the Judge's Extra-Judicial Activities - as to Minimize the Risk of Conflict With Judicial Obligations"

It is our opinion that a grant request under these cireumstances is not a solicitation of funds as prohibited by Canon 4(C) or a violation of Canon 4. We consider the request to be for allocation of appropriated funds to the existing and entitled Drug Court. This grant request is analogous to the mandated budget request for the operation of a District Court from funds appropriated in general for all such courts, and is not a "fundraising activity".
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers
Corporation.

Date: February 26, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Torrey GRADY

179A14-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 6, 2018

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Luke M. Everett, Attorney at Law, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, for Grady, Torrey Dale.

Christopher A. Brook, Legal Director, for American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, et al.

*734The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of October 2018 by Brandon Jerel Buskey for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of November 2018."
#### STATE ex rel. Randy LAVERGNE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2003-KH-1924.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Lavergne, Randy;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 12-97-230.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the filing to the district court for its consideration under the number of relator’s most recent filing there. The district court is directed to provide this Court with a copy of its ruling.
bonz_ex1015.htm


Exhibit 10.15


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 



4
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4699 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor homes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor 

homes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED 

4 MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES FOR MOTOR HOMES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (G) of section 

6 164(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by inserting ‘‘(December 31, 2011, in the case of a 

8 motor home)’’ after ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 

9 (b) INCLUSION OF RECREATION VEHICLE TRAILER

10 AND SLIDE-IN CAMPER.—Section 164(b)(6)(D) of the InVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:23 Feb 26, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4699.IH H4699

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4699 IH

1 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

2 clause (ii) and inserting the following new clauses: 

3 ‘‘(ii) MOTORCYCLE.—The term ‘mo4 torcycle’ has the meaning given such term 

5 under section 571.3 of title 49, Code of 

6 Federal Regulations (as in effect on the 

7 date of the enactment of this paragraph). 

8 ‘‘(iii) MOTOR HOME.—The term 

9 ‘motor home’ has the meaning given such 

10 term under section 571.3 of such title, and 

11 includes a recreation vehicle trailer (as de12 fined in section 571.3 of such title) and a 

13 slide-in camper (as defined in section 

14 575.103 of such title).’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to purchases after December 31, 

17 2009, in tax years ending after such date. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
---

Loan Agreement

Between

Clyvia Technology GmbH Friedrich-List-Allee 10 D-41844
Wegberg-Wildenrath

- In the following referred to as Clyvia -

and

BTec Holding AG Rheinweg 1 CH  8200 Schaffhausen

- In the following referred to as BTec -

Preamble

Clyvia has developed a depolymerization system. In light of the
capital required by Clyvia, the parties enter into the following contract.

1.

BTec shall grant to Clyvia a loan in the amount of EURO
25,000.00 (in words: twenty five thousand EURO). Clyvia hereby acknowledges
receipt.

2.

The loan shall be paid out into the account of Clyvia
Technology GmbH, Wegberg-Wildenrath.

3.

The interest payable on the loan amount shall be 10% p.a.

Page 1 of 2

---

4.

The loan may be canceled by giving one months notice at the end
of a month, however, not before end of the 90th calendar day
following the receipt of the full loan amount in the account specified under
item 2.

5.

Clyvia is entitled to pay back the loan amount including
interest at any time into the account of BTec. This does not require
cancellation.

6.

As collateral for the loan, Inventa shall assign to BTec
187,500 (in words: one hundred eighty-seven thousand five hundred) shares of
Clyvia Inc., USA. BTec is entitled to freely sell the shares in whole or in
part, if Inventa does not or does not fully pay back the loan amount plus
interest after the due date; otherwise, BTec is obligated to return them to
Inventa.

7.

This contract shall exclusively be governed by the laws of the
Federal Republic of Germany with the exception of the United Nations Convention
on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.

8.

Any disputes arising under or in connection with this agreement
shall be conclusively resolved according to the rules of arbitration of the
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in the current version at the time of
the arbitration proceeding by one or several arbitrators appointed according to
these rules of arbitration with under preclusion of the due process of law The
court of arbitration may also make a binding decision regarding the validity of
this arbitration process.

The place of arbitration shall be Zurich.

Additionally to the ICC rules and regulations, as well as any
other binding rules the arbitration proceeding shall be governed by German
law.

The parties agree that German shall be the language utilized in
any arbitration proceeding.

Wegberg, October 1, 2008

|                       |  |                              | 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | 
|Clyvia Technology GmbH |  | BTec Holding AG              | 
|Dieter Wagels          |  | C. Stampfli Dr. Niederbacher | 

Page 2 of 2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation,
certify that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).

Dated: March 27, 2006



/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer
#### Leonard Parker, Appellant, v I.E.S.I. N. Y. Corporation, Defendant, and Paul D. Schlegel, Respondent.

[720 NYS2d 59]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Tar-gum, J.), entered on or about March 27, 2000, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against defendant Schlegel and granted defendant’s cross motion, permitting him to serve an answer to the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While defendant Schlegel, apparently through some oversight of his insurer, failed to timely answer the complaint, he had adequately established a meritorious defense. Further, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that he suffered prejudice as the result of the delay. Since we have held that “[u]pon a showing of a lack of prejudice and a meritorious defense, a default judgment may be vacated and the action restored despite the existence of egregious law office failure” *(Leary v Pou Poune,*273 AD2d 8), and since the negligence of the insurer is akin to law office failure *(see, Barajas v Toll Bros.,*247 AD2d 242; *Murphy v D.V. Waste Control Corp.,*124 AD2d 573; *Ganvey Merchandising Corp. v Knudsen El. Corp.,*169 AD2d 518), we now find that plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against Schlegel was properly denied. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Reargument granted, and upon reargument, the Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on October 31, 2000 (276 AD2d 449), is hereby recalled and vacated.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** The Honorable J. Thomas Marten, District Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 22 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

HASSAN NAMAZI,

Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION &

NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

No. 96-9553

(Petition for Review)

(No. A 73 736 182)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and MARTEN,** District Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral
-2-

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Hassan Namazi is a native of Iran who fled to Venezuela and settled there

for a number of years before he came to the United States. He filed an

application for asylum, claiming persecution in both countries. He petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals which dismissed his

appeal from the denial of his request for asylum. We deny the petition for review.

An immigration judge found that petitioner’s application for asylum from

Iran was barred because he was firmly resettled in Venezuela before he came to

the United States. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(c)(2)(B) (formerly 8 C.F.R.

§ 208.14(d)(2)). The immigration judge also found that petitioner had not

demonstrated a well-founded fear of persecution in Venezuela to support his

application for asylum from that country. The immigration judge therefore denied

petitioner asylum, but granted him withholding of deportation from Iran and

voluntary departure. The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed in a written

opinion, and dismissed petitioner’s appeal.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the entire record, and affirm for

substantially the same reasons as those given by the Board of Immigration

Appeals in its December 3, 1996 order.

Petition for review DENIED.
-3-

Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero 

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of DSA Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Edward L. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                           /S/EDWARD L. FISCHER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Edward L. Fischer
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 11, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 4.10

SCHEDULE OF OMITTED INSTRUMENT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR THE USE OF RADIO FREQUENCY BLOCKS FOR 3G SERVICES

As these agreements are identical in every
case except for their reference number and the sector of Region II covered by them, we have, for ease of reference, filed only the relevant standard instrument of authorization approved by ANATEL and provided this schedule to indicate the
authorizations that we have omitted from filing as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F.



|1. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G Services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No 25/2008, dated April 29, 2008.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G Services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No 26/2008, dated May 26, 2008.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Foronte MCPHAUL

No. 421PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed September 21, 2018

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant/appellee.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant/appellee.

Rayburn Cooper & Durham, P.A., Charlotte, by James B. Gatehouse ; and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, by Sharon Katz, pro hac vice, and Matthew R. Brock, pro hac vice, for Professor Brandon L. Garrett and twenty-five other named scholars representing the fields of law, forensic science, medicine, and statistics, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
#### In re Appeal of Decision of DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 02-PDB-082.

No. 2002-OB-2860.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Raspanti, Janine;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 02-PDB-082.

Leave to appeal denied.
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial                condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/                Christopher Wood                                                                                                                                      |   | By:    | /s/                David Koontz                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | Name:                Christopher Wood                                                                                                                                    |   |   | Name:                David Koontz                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | Title:                  Chief Executive Officer                           (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   | Title:                  Chief Financial Officer            (Principal                Financial and     Accounting                Officer) |

----
# Official Journal L 122/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 122 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5724 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 122

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5724 April 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 375/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (‘EU Aid Volunteers initiative’) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation, amending Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1321/2007 and (EC) No 1330/2007 (
  1
  ) | 18 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 377/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the Copernicus Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 (
  1
  ) | 44 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 378/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 as regards the financial framework for the period 2014-2018 (
  1
  ) | 67 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 375/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (‘EU Aid Volunteers initiative’)

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation, amending Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1321/2007 and (EC) No 1330/2007 (
  1
  )

1

18

*

Regulation (EU) No 377/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the Copernicus Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 (
  1
  )

1

44

*

Regulation (EU) No 378/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 as regards the financial framework for the period 2014-2018 (
  1
  )

1

67

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.