Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 2, 2005 / Notices 5415

2005, in Petersburg, Alaska. The 

purpose of this meeting is to review, 

discuss and potentially recommend for 

funding proposals received pursuant to 

Title II, Public Law 106–393, H.R. 2389, 

the Secure Rural Schools and 

Community Self-Determination Act of 

2000, also called the ‘‘Payments to 

States’’ Act. Public testimony regarding 

the proposals will also be taken.

DATES: The meeting will be held 

commencing at 1 p.m. on Friday, March 

4, through 2 p.m., Saturday, March 5, 

2005.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Petersburg Lutheran Church Holy 

Cross House, 407 Fram Street, 

Petersburg, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patty Grantham, Petersburg District 

Ranger, P.O. Box 1328, Petersburg, AK 

99833, phone (907) 772–3871, e-mail 

pagrantham@fs.fed.us. Toll-free 

conference calling is available for this 

meeting; please call or e-mail for 

specific information. For further 

information on RAC history, operations, 

and the application process, a Web site 

is available at http://www.fs.fed.us/

payments. Once in the website, follow 

the links to the Wrangell-Petersburg 

Resource Advisory Committee.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting will focus on the review and 

discussion of proposals received by the 

RAC for funding under Title II of the 

Payments to States legislation (Pub. L. 

106–393), particularly proposals that 

were of high interest to the committee, 

but lacked enough information for the 

committee to act. New information may 

be introduced concerning these 

proposals. New proposals (initial 

reading) may be discussed at this 

meeting. The committee may make 

recommendations for project funding at 

this meeting. A field trip to review 

proposals proximate to the Petersburg, 

Alaska, area may take place. The 

meeting is open to the public. Public 

input opportunity will be provided and 

individuals will have the opportunity to 

address the committee at that time.

Dated: January 24, 2005. 

Larry Dunham, 

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05–1940 Filed 2–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating five-year 

(‘‘sunset’’) reviews of certain 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders. The International Trade 

Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) is 

publishing concurrently with this notice 

its notice of Institution of Five-Year 

Review which covers these same orders.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Hilary Sadler, Esq., Office of Policy, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce at (202) 482–4340, or Mary 

Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission at (202) 

205–3193.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of sunset reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

sunset reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—

Policies Regarding the Conduct of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 

(April 16, 1998) (‘‘Sunset Policy 

Bulletin’’). 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the second 

sunset reviews of the following 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders:

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product 

A–403–801 .............................. 731–TA–454 .......................... Norway ................................... Fresh & Chilled Atlantic Salmon. 

C–403–802 .............................. 701–TA–302 .......................... Norway ................................... Fresh & Chilled Atlantic Salmon. 

A–580–807 .............................. 731–TA–459 .......................... Korea ..................................... Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film. 

A–428–807 .............................. 731–TA–465 .......................... Germany ................................ Sodium Thiosulfate. 

A–570–805 .............................. 731–TA–466 .......................... China ...................................... Sodium Thiosulfate. 

A–412–805 .............................. 731–TA–468 .......................... United Kingdom ..................... Sodium Thiosulfate. 

A–588–702 .............................. 731–TA–376 .......................... Japan ..................................... Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings. 

A–580–813 .............................. 731–TA–563 .......................... Korea ..................................... Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings. 

A–583–816 .............................. 731–TA–564 .......................... Taiwan ................................... Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

sunset reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and 

Sunset Policy Bulletin, the Department’s 

schedule of sunset reviews, case history 

information (i.e., previous margins, duty 

absorption determinations, scope 

language, import volumes), and service 

lists available to the public on the 

Department’s sunset Internet Web site at 

the following address: ‘‘http://

ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’

All submissions in these sunset 

reviews must be filed in accordance 

with the Department’s regulations 

regarding format, translation, service, 

and certification of documents. These 

rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

Also, we suggest that parties check the 

Department’s sunset Web site for any 

updates to the service list before filing 

any submissions. The Department will 

make additions to and/or deletions from 

the service list provided on the sunset 

Web site based on notifications from 

parties and participation in these 

reviews. Specifically, the Department 

will delete from the service list all 

parties that do not submit a substantive 

response to the notice of initiation. 

Because deadlines in a sunset review 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of the notice of initiation of the 

sunset review. The Department’s 

regulations on submission of proprietary 

information and eligibility to receive 

5416 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 2, 2005 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests for 

extension of that five-day deadline based upon a 

showing of good cause.

access to business proprietary 

information under APO can be found at 

19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties (defined 

in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) 

wishing to participate in these sunset 

reviews must respond not later than 15 

days after the date of publication in the 

Federal Register of the notice of 

initiation by filing a notice of intent to 

participate. The required contents of the 

notice of intent to participate are set 

forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, if we do not receive a notice 

of intent to participate from at least one 

domestic interested party by the 15-day 

deadline, the Department will 

automatically revoke the orders without 

further review. See 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the sunset 

review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of the notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of sunset reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department.

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).

Dated: January 26, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

[FR Doc. 05–1943 Filed 2–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–814] 

Pure Magnesium From Canada: Notice 

of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

the petitioner in this proceeding, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from Canada. Due to the 

recent completion of NAFTA panel 

review of the final remand 

redetermination made by the 

Department concerning the full sunset 

review of that order, the order was 

revoked effective August 1, 2000. 

Therefore, we are rescinding the 

ongoing administrative review covering 

the period August 1, 2003, through July 

31, 2004.

EFFECTIVE DATES: February 2, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–1279.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 31, 1992, the Department 

published in the Federal Register (57 

FR 39390) an antidumping duty order 

on pure magnesium from Canada. On 

August 3, 2004, the Department 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register of the opportunity for 

interested parties to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from Canada. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 69 FR 46496 

(August 3, 2004). On August 30, 2004, 

and in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1) of the Department’s 

regulations, the Department received a 

timely request for review of the 

antidumping duty order from U.S. 

Magnesium LLC, an interested party in 

these proceedings, on imports of pure 

magnesium from Canada by Norsk 

Hydro Canada Inc., and Magnola 

Metallurgy Inc. (collectively, ‘‘the 

respondents’’). 

We published a notice of initiation of 

the antidumping duty administrative 

review on September 22, 2004, with 

respect to the respondents in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(1) of 

the Department’s regulations. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 69 FR 56745 (September 22, 2004). 

The period of review is August 1, 2003, 

through July 31, 2004. 

On November 19, 2004, the NAFTA 

Secretariat published in the Federal 

Register a notice of completion of panel 

review of the final remand 

redetermination made by the 

Department concerning the full sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on pure magnesium from Canada. See 

North American Free-Trade Agreement, 

Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews; 

Completion of Panel Review, 69 FR 

67703 (November 19, 2004). 

On December 7, 2004, pursuant to the 

panel’s decision, the Department 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register of amended final results of its 

full sunset review and revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from Canada effective 

August 1, 2000, the effective date of the 

original full sunset review, in 

accordance with 516A(g)(5)(C) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (‘‘the 

Act’’). See Pure Magnesium from 

Canada; Notice of NAFTA Binational 

Panel’s Final Decision, Amended Final 

Results of Full Sunset Review and 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 

69 FR 70649 (December 7, 2004). 

Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review 

As the result of the revocation of the 

antidumping duty order effective 

August 1, 2000, we are hereby 

rescinding the instant administrative 

review on pure magnesium from 

Canada, the only ongoing review of this 

order. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

Pursuant to sections 751(d)(2) and 

751(d)(3) of the Act, and 351.222 of the 

Department’s regulations, the 

Department has instructed U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to 

terminate the suspension of liquidation 

and to liquidate, without regard to