58470 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices 

the two wing dams, Mormon Island 

Auxiliary Dam, and the eight dikes. 

Retrofitting and increasing the flood 

control capacity of the Folsom Dam and 

its appurtenant structures are currently 

being studied. Locating and extracting 

adequate borrow materials for 

embankment modifications will be a 

major component of the project. 

Reclamation has determined that an EIS 

is warranted to examine the potential 

impacts for implementation of the 

Folsom CAS Project on the natural and 

human environment. 

Potential Modification Alternatives to 

the Folsom Dam and appurtenant 

structures are being identified to reduce 

risks associated with: 

1. Major Flood Events 

2. Earthquakes 

3. Seepage and Piping through 

Embankments 

Folsom Dam and Embankment 

Hydrologic Alternatives include, but are 

not limited to: 

1. Embankment Raise Options 

2. Auxiliary Spillway on the Left 

Abutment Options 

Folsom Dam and Embankment 

Seismic and Static Alternatives include, 

but are not limited to: 

1. Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam 

Seismic Alternatives 

2. Concrete Dam Seismic Options 

3. Folsom Dam and Embankment 

Static Alternatives 

If special assistance is required at the 

scoping meetings, please contact Mr. 

Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation, 

at (916) 989–7256. Please notify Mr. 

Oliver as far in advance of the meetings 

as possible to enable Reclamation to 

secure the needed services. If a request 

cannot be honored, the requestor will be 

notified. 

Reclamation’s policy is to make 

comments, including names and home 

addresses of respondents, available for 

public review. Individual respondents 

may request that we withhold their 

name and/or home address from public 

disclosure, which Reclamation will 

honor to the extent allowable by law. If 

you wish us to withhold your name 

and/or address, you must state this 

prominently at the beginning of your 

comment. Reclamation will make all 

submissions from organizations or 

businesses, and from individuals 

identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public disclosure in their entirety. 

Dated: August 25, 2005. 

Michael Nepstad, 

Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 05–20051 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MW–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

September 19, 2005, a proposed Consent 

Decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) in United 

States v. Eliskim, Inc. et al., Civil Action 

No. 1:05CV2196 was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Ohio, Eastern 

Division. 

In this action, the United States, on 

behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), sought to recover response 

costs from Eliskim, Inc. (‘‘Eliskim’’) and 

the City of Geneva, Ohio (‘‘City’’) 

pursuant to Section 107 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 107. The 

response costs were incurred in 

response to releases and threatened 

releases of hazardous substances from 

the True Temper Sports Superfund Site 

located in the City of Geneva, Ohio (the 

‘‘Site’’). The Consent Decree would 

require Eliskim and the City to pay 

respectively $56,500 and $12,500 

toward the response costs incurred by 

EPA, which are presently estimated to 

be $118,000. The Consent Decree would 

resolve Eliskim’s liability for: (1) Past 

response costs at the Site; and (2) costs, 

penalties, and fees pursuant to an 

Administrative Order by Consent at the 

Site. To the extent provided by the 

Consent Decree, certain specified 

benefits of the settlement would also 

extend to Eliskim’s parent corporation, 

American Household, Inc. Finally, the 

Consent Decree would grant the City a 

de minimis covenant not to sue 

pursuant to Section 122(g) of CERCLA, 

42 U.S.C. 9622(g). 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Eliskim, Inc., et al., No. 

1:05CV2196 (N.D. Ohio), D.J. Ref. 90–

11–2–1310/1. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, 801 West Superior Avenue, 

Suite 400, Cleveland, Ohio 44113–1852, 

and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, 14th Floor, Chicago, 

Illinois. During the public comment 

period, the Consent Decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy 

of the Consent Decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$17.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

William D. Brighton, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–20041 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Amended Notice of Lodging of 

Settlement Agreement Pursuant to the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act and the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

In accordance with 28 CFR 50.7 and 

42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given 

that on September 13, 2005, a 

Settlement Agreement was lodged with 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Puerto Rico in United States 

v. Tropical Fruit, S.E., et al., Civil 

Action No. 97–1442–DRD. On October 

25, 2001, the Court entered a Consent 

Decree between the United States, on 

behalf of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), and 

Defendants pursuant to the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., and 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., 

with respect to a Farm located in Rural 

Zone Boca, Guayanilla, Puerto Rico. The 

Consent Decree required Defendants to 

pay $35,000 in penalties and CERCLA 

response costs and to comply with 

extensive injunctive relief measures, 

including the creation of a no-spray 

buffer zone on the northern and a 

portion of the western perimeter of the 

Farm which will vary in width up to 

173 feet. In December 2004, the United 

States filed a Motion to Enforce the 

Consent Decree and for stipulated 

penalties in that the United States 

alleged that Defendants violated certain 

provisions of the Consent Decree