alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 178/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 178 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6410 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 178

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6410 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 178/01 | Euro exchange rates — 7 May 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 178/01

Euro exchange rates — 7 May 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 178/02 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 2 |
| 2021/C 178/03 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 10 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 178/02

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

2

2021/C 178/03

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Andrew Jermaine JORDAN

No. COA17-1315

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

EAGLE MATERIALS INC. 
 SPECIAL SITUATION PLAN 
 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 

1. The Eagle Materials Inc. Special Situation Plan for Fiscal Year 2014 (the “SSP” or the “Plan”) shall be funded by:
(i) 0.35% of Eagle Material Inc.’s operating earnings, as determined by the Committee; (ii) the portions of subsidiary company and corporate annual incentive compensation bonus pools not paid out (not earned); and
(iii) the portion of the subsidiary companies long-term compensation plans not paid out (not earned). All full-time employees of Eagle Materials Inc. (“Eagle” or the “Company”) or a subsidiary company will be eligible to
receive an SSP award. 
  

	 	A.	An SSP award is intended to recognize outstanding individual performances during the current fiscal year based on contributions that dramatically improve the
Company’s profitability or worth. 

  

	 	B.	An SSP award may also be made to individuals at Eagle or at subsidiary companies whose operating profit has been adversely affected by market conditions in order to
recognize superior performance of the participants at those companies. 

  

	 	C.	SSP funds not awarded may be retained by the Company for use in future fiscal years. 


2. SSP awards may be recommended by subsidiary company Presidents, Eagle EVP’s and/or the Eagle Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”). The approval of the Eagle CEO is required for all SSP awards. For senior executive officers who are required to make disclosures under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Executive
Officers”), an SSP award shall be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Eagle (the “Committee”). 
 3. The SSP shall be administered by the CEO, who shall have full and exclusive power to interpret the Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as the CEO may
deem necessary or appropriate in the CEO’s sole discretion. All decisions of the CEO shall be binding and conclusive on the participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any matter affecting an SSP award to an Executive Officer (including,
without limitation, any interpretation of the Plan or the adoption of any rules, regulations or guidelines affecting an award to an Executive Officer) shall be approved by the Committee. Any decision by the Committee with respect to an Executive
Officer shall be final and binding. 
 4. This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto, shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without reference to any conflicts of law principles thereof that would require the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6066

In Re: WILLIAM HAMILTON,

Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (9:00-cr-00263-SB-7) Submitted: May 25, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Hamilton, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Hamilton also claims several pro se motions filed during his criminal proceedings remain pending. Those motions were disposed of by virtue of the criminal judgment. - 2 - PER CURIAM: William Hamilton petitions for a writ of mandamus claiming there was undue delay by the district court in disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The Government filed a response noting that on May 8, 2007, the district court entered an order disposing of several of Hamilton’s motions, dismissed many of his claims, and ordered that counsel be appointed and a hearing be held to consider one of Hamilton’s claims. In light of the court’s action, we deny as moot Hamilton’s petition for a writ of mandamus. * We also deny his motions for clarificati on and for summary judgment. We grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN RE: J.B.

335P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2018

Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, for J.B.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, Janelle Varley, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of October 2018 by Counsel to Withdraw as Counsel of Record:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of October 2018."
Exhibit 4.49


Published in Federal Gazette of 4/3/2007Page: 61Section: 1Initial ____________________








ACT No. 64327, OF APRIL 02nd, 2007.




THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES OF THE BRAZILIAN AGENCY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS - ANATEL,under the powers conferred upon him, pursuant to art. 135, c/c art. 190 and corresponding items, of the Internal Rules of the Brazilian Agency of Telecommunications - Anatel, approved by Resolution No. 270, of July 19th, 2001, and




WHEREAS the provisions of the Regulation of Collection of Public Price for the Right to use Radiofrequencies, approved by Resolution No. 387, of November 3rd, 2004, decides:




Art. 1 To authorize the use of radiofrequencies indicated in the table herein attached, without exclusive right, to INTELIG TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA, up to January 22nd, 2019, to be used for the provision of the Landline Telephone Service for public use (STFC), object of Authorization Instrument No. 01/1999/SPB-ANATEL, of January 21st, 1999.




Art. 2 The Public Price for the Right to use Radiofrequencies - PPDUR, authorized by this Act, calculated in accordance with the provisions of the referred Regulation, is R$ 1,476.00 (one thousand, four hundred and seventy-six Reais), as provided in the table herein attached.




Sole Paragraph: The effective use of radiofrequencies is subject to the collection of the value to be paid for the right to use radiofrequencies, or the payment of the first installment if under installment plan.




Art. 3 The Service Provider shall only use the radiofrequencies herein authorized after obtaining the licenses for the operation of the stations.




Art. 4 This Act shall be in force as of the date of its publication.




(There appears signature)




GILBERTO ALVES


Superintendent of Public Services


Interim








ANATEL/SPBSICAP: 200790046860DATE: 04/02/2007CHECKED: __________________













ANNEX TO ACT No. 64327/2007-ANATEL




AUTHORIZED FREQUENCIES




NETWORK NUMBER
STATION

NUMBER
FREQUENCY
K
B (khz )
A (km2)
T2 (years)
F(f)
HISTORICAL VALUE

(R$)
CALCULATED VALUE

(R$)
DUE VALUE

(R$)00001
0623288478
19.11750000 GHz
20
7000.000000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
0.00
240.00
240.0000001
0684595630
18.77750000 GHz
20
7000.000000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
0.00
240.00
240.0000015
0608249041
18.00250001 GHz
20
27500.00000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
0.00
330.00
330.0000015
0613522974
19.56250001 GHz
20
27500.00000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
0.00
330.00
330.0000021
0623283549
38.97600000 GHz
20
28000.00000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
0.00
336.00
336.0000033
0687598893
39.03200000 GHz
20
28000.00000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
392.00
336.00
0.0000033
0687598923
37.77200000 GHz
20
28000.00000
1.000000
12.00
0.00100
392.00
336.00
0.00TOTAL VALUE (R$)
0.00
480.00
1,476.00
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Liberty Media International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004
and 2003. Dated: November 12, 2004
    /s/
    John C. MaloneJohn C. MaloneChief Executive Officer Dated: November 12, 2004
    /s/
    Bernard G. DvorakBernard DvorakSenior Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) Dated: November 12, 2004
    /s/
    Graham HollisGraham HollisSenior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer) The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Bruce Butcher, P.Eng., and the information that I reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 24th day of March, 2015.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ Bruce Butcher


Bruce Butcher, P.Eng.








---




CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, F. Carl Edmunds, P.Geo., and the information that I reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 24th day of March, 2015.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ F. Carl Edmunds


F. Carl Edmunds,  P.Geo.








---




CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Trevor J. Yeomans, ACSM, P.Eng., and reports, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Pirquitas Mine, Jujuy Province, Argentina dated December 23, 2011, and NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada dated November 19, 2014 (the “ Reports ”), and the information contained in the Reports that I prepared, or reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 24th day of March, 2015.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ Trevor J. Yeomans


Trevor J. Yeomans, ACSM, P.Eng.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4571 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4571

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 
 as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 
      certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2014

 Mr. Hultgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 
 as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 
      certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED THRESHOLD FOR DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COMPENSATORY 
              BENEFIT PLANS.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise section 230.701(e) 
of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, so as to increase from 
$5,000,000 to $20,000,000 the aggregate sales price or amount of 
securities sold during any consecutive 12-month period in excess of 
which the issuer is required under such section to deliver an 
additional disclosure to investors. The Commission shall index for 
inflation such aggregate sales price or amount every 5 years to reflect 
the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rounding to the nearest 
$1,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Diondre Montrez BITTLE

No. COA17-999

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2010 |  | /s/ James A. Thomas    
|                    |  | James A. Thomas        
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael SAMPSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2003-KH-1652.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Sampson, Michael;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 98-135, 98-136; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 02 00327.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the Court of Appeal, *1005Third Circuit, for enforcement of its order in *State v. Sampson,*02-0327 (La.App. 3d Cir.6/19/02), if it has not done so already.

KNOLL, J., recused.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO


 


ADVISORY AGREEMENT  


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT
to ADVISORY AGREEMENT is entered into as of March 11, 2013, by and among, ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc. (the “Company”),
ARC Realty Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”) and ARC Realty Finance Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the
Company, the OP and the Advisor entered into that certain Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”), dated
as of February 12, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 25 of the Advisory Agreement, the Company, the OP and the Advisor desire to make a certain amendment to the Advisory
Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises made hereunder, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Amendment to Section 11(a)(i) of the Advisory Agreement. Section 11(a)(i) of the Advisory Agreement is hereby replaced
in its entirety with the following:



 


“i. Organization and Offering Expenses, including
third-party due diligence fees related to the Primary Offering, as set forth in detailed and itemized invoices; provided,
however, that the Company shall not reimburse the Advisor to the extent such reimbursement would cause the total amount
of Organization and Offering Expenses paid by the Company and the Operating Partnership to exceed two percent (2.0%) of
the Gross Proceeds raised in all Primary Offerings;”


 


[Signature page follows.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned, intending to be legally bound hereby, have duly executed this agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	ARC REALTY FINANCE TRUST, INC. 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Name:	Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	 	ARC REALTY FINANCE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
	 	 
	 	By: ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc., its general partner
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Name:	Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	 	ARC REALTY FINANCE ADVISORS, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	ARC Realty Finance Special Limited Partnership,

LLC, its sole member 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	American Realty Capital VIII, LLC, its sole

member
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	AR Capital, LLC, its sole member


 


	 	By:	/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Name:	Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Title:	Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 425 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 425

   To prohibit the use of funds for the rule entitled ``Provisional 
  Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate 
Relatives'' published by the Department of Homeland Security on January 
                      3, 2013 (78 Fed. Reg. 535).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2013

 Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. 
    Long, Mrs. Hartzler, Ms. Foxx, and Mr. Barletta) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of funds for the rule entitled ``Provisional 
  Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate 
Relatives'' published by the Department of Homeland Security on January 
                      3, 2013 (78 Fed. Reg. 535).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR A RULE REGARDING 
              PROVISIONAL WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY.

    No Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce 
the final rule entitled ``Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of 
Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives'' published by the 
Department of Homeland Security on January 3, 2013 (78 Fed. Reg. 535), 
or any successor or substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. James Edward BELL, Jr.

No. 237P04-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

James Edward Bell, Jr., for Bell, James Edward, Jr.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State.

*386***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of August 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."