alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mondial  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2006


/s/ Joe Alvaro
---------------------------------------
Joe Alvaro, Principal Financial Officer
In the MATTER OF: T.S.B.-S., A.A.S., T.S.B.

No. COA17-1343

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-87/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/17/EC - Reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 19/14)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-87/04: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 23 February 2004, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and P. Léouffre) against Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting as President of the Fourth Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 85 of 3.4.2004.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-8]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains a summary of a certain petition seeking relief from specified 
requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the 
public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's 
regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before February 23, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2005-20049 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a 
self-addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Thor (425-227-2127), Transport 
Airplane Directorate (ANM-113), Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 
Lind Ave., SW., Renton, WA 98055-4056; or John Linsenmeyer (202-267-
5174), Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 28, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2005-20049.
    Petitioner: The Boeing Company.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 25.562(b)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought: The Boeing Company requests relief 
from the pitch and roll requirements of 14 CFR 25.562(b)(2) for 
flightdeck seats on the Boeing Model 7E7 airplane.

[FR Doc. 05-2024 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I,Wesley Whiting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dynadapt Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of April 30, 2004; and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 7, 2004


/s/Wesley Whiting
-----------------------
Wesley Whiting, President
STARDUST 3007 L.L.C. et al v. CITY OF BROOKHAVEN.

S18A0213

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: February 19, 2018

**PER CURIAM**.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Anthony J.Nocchiero, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Worldwide, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

# 4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  May 12, 2006
|        | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero       |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name: Anthony J. Nocchiero     |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
252 I._ 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATrORNEY GENERAL September 29, 1945 

Railroad Commission of Texas 

Capitol Building 

Austin, Texas 

Attentior:: Gus J. Strauss, Director 

Gas Utilities Division 

Gentlemen: 

Gas Licensee. 

egislature, Regular 

. . . 

.' 

Y~GENERAL OF TEXAS
|   | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 19, 2014 |                                |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                 |                                |
| By:                  | /s/ Antonio Carlos Valente da Silva |   |
|                 | Name:                               | Antonio Carlos Valente da Silva |   |
|                 | Title:                              | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 08a0307n.06 F iled: May 29, 2008 No. 07-5782 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT

CLESS IE MEADOR, et al., P lai nt iffs- App e lla nt s,

v. HOU CH EN S IN DU STR IES, IN C. , e t a l. Defendan t-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EAL F RO M THE U NI TED STA TES DI STR IC T CO UR T F OR THE WE S TE RN D IS TR IC T OF KENT UCKY

Be for e : N OR RI S, G IBBO NS, and G RI F F IN , C ir c uitJudg e s. P ER CURIAM . Plaintiff-appe llant Clessie Meador sustaine d injuries in a g roce ry store when soft dr inks fell o n t o p of him. He a nd his wife, Sondra Me ador, sue d defe ndant-a ppellee I ndiana Insuranc e C o m p any , the g roce ry store’s insura

nce pr ovider. He argues that the insura nce

c omp any vio la te d the Ke ntu c ky Un fa ir Cla ims Se ttl e me nt P ra c tic e s A c t by fa ili ngto p ay

his c la im in good f aith. Havingrevie wed the pa

rties’ brie fs and the applicable law and having had the benef it of oral argument, we c onclude that a pane l opinion further a ddressing the issues raise d would serve no jurisprudential purpose . There fore , on the g rounds identifi ed b y t h e d i strict court, we aff irm the d i s t r i c tc o u rt ’ s j u d g m e n ti nf a v o r o f In d i an a In s u r an c e C o mp an y.
# United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Decided July 10, 2018 No. 14-1022 J AMES L. R OBERTS , P ETITIONER V . N ATIONAL T RANSPORTATION S AFETY B OARD AND F EDERAL A VIATION A DMINISTRATION , RESPONDENTS On Motions to Supplement Equal Access to Justice Act Application

David B. Anderson and Deanna L. Weidner were on the motions to supplement Equal Access to Justice Act application and the reply for petitioner. Sonia M. Carson and Charles W. Scarborough , Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, were on the opposition for the respondents. Before: W ILKINS , Circuit Judge , and S ENTELLE and R

ANDOLPH , Senior Circuit Judges

. Opinion for the Court filed P ER C URIAM .2 P ER C URIAM : Before us is the application of James L. Roberts for attorney’s fees and expenses he incurred in 2014 an d 2015 in connection with his successful petition for judicial review in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board , 776 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2015). 1 Roberts filed his application with this court pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2412. Section 2412 requires a party seeking fees and expenses to file an application “withi n thirty days of final judgment in the action.” Id. § 2412(d)(1)(B). Our decision in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board became final on April 23, 2015. The limitations period in § 2412 runs from the time of final judgment in “ the court before which the civil action is pending ,” not from the final decision of an administrative agency. Melkonyan v. Sullivan , 501 U.S. 89, 94 (1991) (emphasis in original); see also id. at 94–95. Because Roberts submitted his § 2412 application on May 4, 2018, more than three years after this court’s final judgment, his application was untimely. We therefore deny it. So ordered.

1 The subject of Roberts’ petition for judicial review was the National Transportation Safety Board’s denial of his request, which he filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 504, for legal fees and expenses i ncurred in administrative proceedings. This court ruled in Roberts’ favor and remanded the case to the Board. On April 4, 2018, the Board gr anted Roberts’ application for fees and expenses.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4683 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4683

To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to repeal the Market Access 
               Program of the Department of Agriculture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2010

 Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Garrett of 
 New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to repeal the Market Access 
               Program of the Department of Agriculture.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scrap the MAP Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MARKET ACCESS PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal of Program.--Section 203 of the Agricultural Trade Act 
of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5623) is repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Funding.--Section 211 of the Agricultural Trade Act 
of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5641) is amended by striking subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
JONES v. CRANFORD

80P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Darron J. Jones, for Jones, Darron J.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of April 2018 by Plaintiff to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cesar
Villavicencio, CEO and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Cesar Villavicencio
-------------------------------
Cesar  Villavicencio
CEO and Principal Accounting Officer
Date: May 16, 2005
Ricky Edward EMERT, individually, and on behalf of Prodigy Allstars of Concord, Inc. and Prodigy Allstars Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Amanda Leigh SMITH and husband, Cody R. Smith; United Spirit, Inc.; Kevin Brubaker; Leigh Ann Barger a/k/a Leigh Ann Fowlkes; Jeffrey L. Fowlkes; Charlotte Allstars Cheerleading and Dance; Charlotte Allstar Cheerleading Booster Club ; Cheersport, Corp. ; Spirit Holdings, Inc.; Charlotte Allstar Cheerleading ; Charlotte Allstar Cheerleading, Inc. ; Charlotte Allstars; Charlotte Allstars, Inc.; Cheersport, Jennifer Brubaker; Julia O'brien; and ISC Gymnastics and Cheerleading, LLC, Defendants, v. Hope Emert And North Carolina Youth Football League, Third-party Defendants.

No. COA17-1121

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of eGain

Communications Corporation



|1. | eGain Communications Ltd. (UK)
|-- | ------------------------------



|2. | eGain Communications Pty Ltd. (Australia)
|-- | -----------------------------------------



|3. | eGain (Cayman) Ltd. (Cayman)
|-- | ----------------------------



|4. | Inference Corporation (Delaware)
|-- | --------------------------------



|5. | eGain Communications Pvt. Ltd. (India)
|-- | --------------------------------------



|6. | eGain Communications SrL (Italy)
|-- | --------------------------------



|7. | eGain Communications B.V. (Netherlands)
|-- | ---------------------------------------



|8. | eGain Communications Ltd. (Ireland)
|-- | -----------------------------------



|9. | eGain Communications Pacific Pte. Ltd (Singapore)
|-- | -------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Trust (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, WILLIAM P.
HANKOWSKY, President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Property Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/  WILLIAM P. HANKOWSKY
-------------------------------------
William P. Hankowsky
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jon C. Parker, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date:  September 27, 2004


/s/ Jon C. Parker
-----------------
Jon C. Parker
Chief Financial Officer


                                     PAGE 33