alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a Certificate of Financial Responsibility To Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to the provisions of section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 App. U.S.C. 817 (d)) and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 CFR part 540, as amended:

American Cruise Lines, Inc., One Marine Park, Haddam, CT 06438, 

Vessel: AMERICAN SPIRIT.

Carnival Corporation (d/b/a Carnival and Carnival Cruise Line), 3655 NW 87th Avenue, Miami, FL 33178,

Vessel: CARNIVAL LIBERTY.

Costa Crociere S.p.A. and Costa Cruise Lines N.V., Venture Corporate Center II, 200 South Park Road, Suite 200, Hollywood, FL 33021-8541,

Vessel: COSTA MAGICA.

NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. and Norwegian Jewel Ltd., 7665 Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL 33126,

Vessel: NORWEGIAN JEWEL.

NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. and Pride of America Ship Holding, Inc., 7665 Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL 33126,

Vessel: PRIDE OF AMERICA.

Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., 24305 Town Center Drive, Santa Clarita, CA 91355,

Vessel: SEA PRINCESS.

Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., and Carnival PLC, 24305 Town Center Drive, Santa Clarita, CA 91355,

Vessel: PACIFIC PRINCESS and TAHITIAN PRINCESS.

Saga Shipping Company, Ltd., Saga Cruises Ltd., Saga Holidays Limited, Saffron Maritime/Columbia Ship Management, Magsaysay Maritime Corporation, Saga Group, Saga Holdings Ltd., The Saga Building, Enbrook Park, Folkestone, Kent CT20 3SE,

Vessel: SAGA RUBY.

Dated: September 30, 2005.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-20010 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________

JOHN D. WILSON, JR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

__________________________

2013-7037

__________________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in case no. 11-0165, Judge Lawrence B. 

Hagel. 

__________________________

ON MOTION

__________________________

O R D E R

John D. Wilson, Jr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

The court notes that Wilson did not file the required 

supplemental in forma pauperis form for prisoners. 

Federal Circuit Form 6A. 

Case: 13-7037 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 02/12/2013
JOHN WILSON, JR. V. SHINSEKI 2

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Wilson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. 

(2) If Wilson does not submit the supplemental in 

forma pauperis form for prisoners within 14 days of the 

date of this order, the court will dismiss this appeal. 

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s24

Case: 13-7037 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 02/12/2013
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6334

ROBERT JOE MCNEMAR , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. RALPH TERRY, Acting Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 00108

- JPB )

Submitted : July 31, 2018 Decided: August 17, 2018

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Robert Joe McNemar , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Joe McNemar seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the

rec ommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of
appea lability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurist s would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the recor d and conclude that McNemar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant McNemar’s motion for leave to file supplemental argument, we deny his motions for a certificate of appealability and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN C. CRAWFORD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 103 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of December , 2021, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the

Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4649 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4649

              To prohibit funding to the Voice of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To prohibit funding to the Voice of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING THE VOICE OF AMERICA.

    No funds available to the Department of State or any other 
department or agency may be used to provide contributions directly or 
indirectly to the Voice of America.
                                 <all>
```
United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

T.D., Appellant 

and 

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Philadelphia, PA, Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 15-0609 

Issued: April 26, 2017 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Thomas R. Uliase, Esq., for the appellant 

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

ORDER REMANDING CASE 

Before: 

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge 

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

On January 26, 2015 appellant, through counsel, filed an application for review of 

September 17 and November 5, 2014 merit decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation 

Programs (OWCP). The appeal was docketed as No. 15-609. 

The only decision before the Board in the present appeal is the September 17, 2014 

decision issued under File No. xxxxxx154, which terminated appellant’s medical benefits for 

neck strain, leg and shoulder strain, and right lateral epicondylitis. Although counsel also 

appealed a November 5, 2014 decision, adjudicated under file number xxxxxx741, the record 

before the Board does not include File No. xxxxxx741, which was also accepted for right lateral 

epicondylitis. The medical reports under file number xxxxxx741 have bearing on the issue of 

whether OWCP properly terminated medical benefits in the September 17, 2014 decision. 

The case must, therefore, be remanded to OWCP to combine OWCP File No. xxxxxx741 

with the instant case, OWCP File No. xxxxxx154. This will allow OWCP to consider all 

relevant claim files in developing appellant’s claim and serve to avoid piecemeal adjudication1

that could raise the possibility of inconsistent results. Following this and such other 

development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue an appropriate de novo decision. 

 1 See William T. McCracken, 33 ECAB 1197 (1982). 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs dated September 17, 2014 is set aside and the case is remanded for 

further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board. 

Issued: April 26, 2017 

Washington, DC 

 

 Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
In the MATTER OF: J.P.

No. COA17-1375

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 17, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
#### Frances Van Devender Bingham et al., *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. Ernest Randolph Sumner et al., *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 15, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 26, 1928.

*Whitaker, Himes & Whitaker*and *James F. Glen,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*J. Uhle Bethell, Harris & Denning*and *Kelly, Sutton & Shaw,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.'

The judgment in this case should be reversed upon authority of the controlling opinion filed on rehearing in the case of McCamy v. Payne, opinion filed at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion!

Strum, J., not particupating.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WLG Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Jillings, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, David L. Koontz, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge that:
 
 1. The
Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.
 
 Date:
August 16, 2010
  By:
              /s/
      Andrew Jillings
              
              By:
              /s/
      David KoontzName:
      Andrew Jillings
              
              
              Name:
      David KoontzTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              
              
              Title:
      Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial and
                Accounting
      Officer)
#### Richard Holt, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 14, 1928.

*Philip D. Beall*and *John M. Coe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred E. Davis,*Attorney General and *E. E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *488judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
#### Anna Lardner McCarty, Daniel T. McCarty, Brian K. McCarty, John Moore McCarty and Evelyn Wallace McCarty, Infants Under the Age of Twenty-one Years, and Frances L. McCarty and Ft. Pierce Merchants Association, a Corporation, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Horace S. McClendon, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

*Fee & Liddon,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Nottingham, & Anderson, Russell L. Frink*and *Robert H. Anderson,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-271]


Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear 
Operations, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to 
Facility Operating License

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has 
granted the request of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy 
Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) to withdraw its April 25, 2003, 
application, as supplemented May 21, 2003, June 11, 2003, and June 30, 
2005, for a proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-28 
for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS), located in 
Windham County Vermont.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the VYNPS Technical 
Specifications (TSs) related to instrumentation to correct deficiencies 
in the TSs, reduce operator work-arounds, improve and correct confusing 
and ambiguous TS requirements, and allow for process enhancements.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on August 5, 
2003 (68 FR 46241). However, by letter dated September 7, 2005, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed amendment request.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated April 25, 2003, as supplemented on May 
21, 2003, June 11, 2003, and June 30, 2005, and the license's letter 
dated September 7, 2005, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area 01 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) 
Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at the NRC Web site, 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html. Persons who do not have 
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents 
located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR reference staff by 
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfafbbad9fb1adbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb8b9f89bb958998d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of September, 2005.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard B. Ennis,
Senior Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 05-19620 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCT 20, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-13689

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 01-00892-CR-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LONNIE PORTER,

a.k.a. Luqman Eliman,

a.k.a. Lugman Eliman,

a.k.a. Ludman Eliman,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 20, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
In 2004, a jury found Lonnie Porter guilty of conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine and 50 grams or more of

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) (Count

1); possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Count 5); and

conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) and

(a)(1)(B)(I) (Count 6). In 2007, we affirmed Porter’s convictions, but remanded

for re-sentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). On

remand, the court sentenced Porter to concurrent prison terms of 120 months. He

now appeals, contending that these sentences are unreasonable because they are

disparate from those imposed on his codefendants, exceeded his criminal

responsibility, and did not adequately account for his post-sentencing rehabilitative

conduct.

After Booker, the district courts are still bound by statutory minimum

penalties. United States v. Castaing-Sosa, 530 F.3d 1358, 1362 (11th Cir. 2008)

(“Booker’s instruction to district courts to consider the factors in § 3553(a) in

fashioning a reasonable sentence cannot be read to authorize using the § 3553(a)

factors to impose a sentence below an applicable statutory mandatory minimum.”).

2
The district court sentenced Porter to the statutory mandatory minimum

sentence, 120 months, for Counts 1 and 5 under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A).

Because the court could not have imposed sentences of a lesser term for those

offenses, his sentences could not be held to be unreasonable.

AFFIRMED.

3
<page>	            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	        Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2009
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Jay GUERRETTE

No. COA18-24

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 2, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59028-59029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20320]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Eastern Idaho Resource Advisory Committee; Caribou-Targhee 
National Forest, Idaho Falls, ID

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

[[Page 59029]]

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Caribou-Targhee 
National Forests' Eastern Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
Wednesday, November 30, 2005 in Idaho Falls for a business meeting. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The business meeting will be held on November 30, 2005 from 10 
a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting location is the Caribou-Targhee National Forest 
Headquarters Office, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Timchak, Caribou-Targhee 
National Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 
524-7500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on November 30, 2005, 
begins at 10 a.m., at the Caribou-Targhee National Forest Headquarters 
Office, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Agenda topics will 
include looking at funding for this upcoming year, briefed on project 
status from last year's approved projects, and welcoming the new Forest 
Supervisor/Designated Federal Officer.

    Dated: October 3, 2005.
Lawrence A. Timchak,
Caribou-Targhee Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-20320 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```