alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, Request 
for Comments; Renewal of an Approved Information Collection Activity, 
Part 65, Certification: Airmen Other Than Flight Crewmembers, Subpart 
C, Aircraft Dispatchers and App. A Aircraft Dispatcher Courses

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request 
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval for a new 
information collection. The respondents to this information collection 
will be FAR Part 135 and Part 121 operators. The FAA will use the 
information to ensure compliance and adherence to the regulations.

DATES: Please submit comments by November 7, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Street on (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Part 65, Certification: Airmen other than flight 
Crewmembers, Subpart C, Aircraft Dispatchers and App. A Aircraft 
Dispatcher Courses.
    Type of Request: Renewal of an approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0648.
    Forms(s): None.
    Affected Public: A total of 36 airmen.
    Frequency: The information is conducted on an as-needed basis.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 4,679 hours annually.
    Abstract: The respondents to this information collection will be 
FAR Part 135 and Part 121 operators. The FAA will use the information 
to ensure compliance and adherence to the regulations.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: FAA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2005.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Information Systems and 
Technology Services Staff, ABA-20.
[FR Doc. 05-20177 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas BARNETTE, Defendant.

No. COA17-1082

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
#### In re Herman JOHNSON, Jr.

No. 2003-OB-1572.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Johnson, Herman, Jr.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Motion for Production of Information.

Deny on the showing made.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, W. Todd Steele, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WPT Enterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for WPTEnterprises, Inc., and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to WPT Enterprises, Inc.,including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and c. disclosed in this report any change in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during WPTEnterprises, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, WPT Enterprises,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofWPT Enterprises, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 17, 2004 /s/ W. Todd Steele
SCWC-19-0000441

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

FRANCIS HUNT,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000441; CASE NO. 1DTC-18-033737)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on July 2, 2021, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 6, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000441

06-AUG-2021

10:42 AM

Dkt. 9 ODAC
STATE of North Carolina v. Sergio Andres NARANJO

No. COA17-742

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
#### **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**The following certification isfurnished pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and ExchangeCommission and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liabilityof that section.  Such certification shall not be deemed incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such certification isspecifically incorporated by reference by the registrant.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report ofMetro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy A. Timmins, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
|           | /s/ Timothy A.  Timmins     |   |
|----------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|           | Timothy A.  Timmins         |
|           | President, Chief  Executive |
|           | Officer                     |
|           |                        |
|           |                        |
|           | /s/ Duane C.  Fromhart      |   |
|           | Duane C. Fromhart           |
|           | Senior Vice President,      |
|           | Chief Financial Officer     |
|           |                        |
| March 16, 2005 |                        |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I. John B. Wadsworth, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blue Ridge Paper ProductsInc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

(a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: August11, 2006 
|        | **/s/  JOHN B. WADSWORTH**     | ** ** |
|--------|--------------------------------|------------|
|   | John B.  Wadsworth             |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer       |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4686 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4686

 To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System an 
     area included in Unit TX-15P in Texas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2014

Mr. Farenthold introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System an 
     area included in Unit TX-15P in Texas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              OF AREA INCLUDED IN TEXAS SYSTEM UNIT P-15.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later than 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise maps referred to in 
section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) 
as necessary to remove from Texas System Unit P-15 the area known as 
Preserve at Mustang Island, also known as Tortuga Dunes on Mustang 
Island, in Nueces County Texas.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Charter Millburn L.P. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      21,677,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,109,437<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,708,029<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,708,029<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (653,797)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,276,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,929,953)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,929,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,929,953)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $1,013,235 and
interest receivable of $96,202.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $920,823.
<F3>Liabilities include accrued brokerage fee of $129,371, accrued
management fee of $36,963, and redemptions payable of $237,975.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(2,134,562), net
change in unrealized of $920,823 and interest income of $559,942.
</FN>


</TABLE>
State of North Carolina v. John Joseph Carvalho, II

No. 369A15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 21, 2016

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, and Derrick C. Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue before this Court under N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Argued and submitted March 31,

reversed and remanded for new trial May 15, 2003

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*ROCKY DEVON SMITH, *Appellant.*

C991426CR; A110289

69 P3d 787

Andy Simrin, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

Holly A. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Judge.

EDMONDS, P. J.

*564EDMONDS, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for robbery in the first degree, assault in the second and third degrees, and related firearms charges. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to inquire into his complaints concerning appointed counsel after he requested the appointment of new counsel on his behalf. We reverse.

Before the trial began, defendant asked for the appointment of different counsel, complaining that his existing counsel had failed to investigate the case and to interview potential witnesses. The trial court did not inquire into those complaints; rather, it stated that it had great respect for defendant’s attorney and accepted the attorney’s representation that he was ready to proceed. That was error. *State v. Coffey,*158 Or App 112, 972 P2d 1219 (1999); *State v. Grcich,*148 Or App 337, 939 P2d 649 (1997).

In *Coffey*and *Grcich,*we held that the trial court’s failure to inquire constituted reversible error. The state nevertheless suggests that we should remand for the trial court to determine whether defendant’s attorney in fact adequately represented him. It relies on *State v. Pyle,*182 Or App 520, 50 P3d 591, *rev den,*335 Or 104 (2002), in which we stated that, even if the trial court had abused its discretion in refusing to appoint new counsel, the defendant was not prejudiced. In *Pyle,*however, the court inquired into the defendant’s complaints about his retained counsel’s performance and concluded that they were not legitimate. We affirmed.

Here the trial court failed to inquire at all. *Pyle,*thus, is inapposite to our holdings in *Coffey*and *Grcich.*Moreover, it is unclear to us how the trial court could conduct such an inquiry without holding a hearing tantamount to a post-conviction relief proceeding. We are not aware of any authority that holds such a procedure proper on remand from a direct appeal.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                  15 (d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek    |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek        |
|   | Title: | Chief                Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  | June                  15, 2005         |
|   |   |                                   |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
No. 96-31218

____________________

EUREKA HOMESTEAD SOCIETY
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HOWARD, WEIL, LABOUISSE, FREDERICHS, INC.;

BARTON N. McLAUGHLIN

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

New Orleans (94-CV-452-D)

_______________________________________________

November 14, 1997 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Among other things, the evidence supports th e jury’s
ratification findings. AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT




This Amendment is dated effective as of the 16th day of May, 2013 by and between N-Viro International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Robert W. Bohmer (“Employee”).




WHEREAS, the parties hereto are signatories to that certain Employment Agreement dated March 17, 2010 providing for Employee to serve as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company for a five (5) year term ending on February 25, 2015.




WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to modify the compensation terms set forth in the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual promises, covenants and conditions herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




1.

Employee shall return to the Company the following number of stock options granted by Section 5.03 of the Employment Agreement that were received and vested for the following years under the 2004 Stock Option Plan:

a.

2010: 39,000

b.

2011: 39,000

c.

2012: 39,000

2.

The Parties agree that Employee’s option grants under Section 5.03 of his Employment Agreement under the 2004 Stock Option Plan that called for additional receipt of vested options in 2013 and 2014 are waived, totaling 128,000 options.

3.

The Company and Employee agree to amend Section 5.03 of the Employment Agreement providing for new annual grants under the 2004 Stock Option Plan on the effective date of this Amendment and on May 12, 2014, as follows:

a.

2013: 25,000

b.

2014: 25,000

4.

The Company and Employee agree to further amend Section 5.03 of the Employment Agreement to provide sequential annual grants under the 2010 Stock Option Plan on the effective date of this Amendment and the anniversary of the effective date as follows:

a.

2013: 100,000

b.

2014: 50,000

5.

All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged.  The parties agree to the above changes and waive any claims relating to the adoption of this Amendment and the alteration of the Employment Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the Company and Employee as of the date first above written.




N-VIRO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION




By:  /s/  James H. Hartung

Its: Chairman of the Board




  /s/  Robert W. Bohmer

Robert W. Bohmer