alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. David E. WASSERSTROM, Respondent.

No. 612 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 24, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2003, there having been filed with this Court by David E. Wasserstrom his verified Statement of Resignation dated May 20, 2003, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of David E. Wasserstrom be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania retroactive to November 17, 2000; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4513 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit private educational lenders 

from requiring accelerated repayment of private education loans upon 

the death or disability of a cosigner of the loan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit private 

educational lenders from requiring accelerated repayment 

of private education loans upon the death or disability 

of a cosigner of the loan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Debt Repay5 ment Fairness Act of 2014’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4513 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING FULL REPAYMENT OF 

2 PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN UPON DEATH OR 

3 DISABILITY OF COSIGNER. 

4 Section 140 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 1650) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 subsection: 

7 ‘‘(g) PROHIBITION ON ACCELERATING REPAYMENT

8 UPON DEATH OR DISABILITY OF A COSIGNER ON A PRI9 VATE EDUCATION LOAN.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a cosigner who is jointly 

11 liable on a private education loan is unable to fulfill 

12 any obligations with respect to the loan by reason of 

13 death or disability, the private educational lender 

14 may not accelerate the repayment terms of any out15 standing obligation if the borrower is in good stand16 ing (as determined by the Bureau) with respect to 

17 the loan. 

18 ‘‘(2) DISABILITY DEFINED.—In this subsection, 

19 the term ‘disability’ means a permanent and total 

20 disability, as determined in accordance with the reg21 ulations of the Secretary of Education under section 

22 437(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

23 U.S.C. 1087(a)), or a determination by the Sec24 retary of Veterans Affairs that the individual is un25 employable due to a service-connected condition.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 
 
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued001833F
Commodity Forwarders, Inc., 11101 South La Cienega Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045.
September 5, 2005.003296F
Consuelo E. Kelly dba, Kelly International, 10257 Switzer, Overland Park, KS 66212.
August 26, 2005.017663N
Data Cargo Co., Inc., 8757 NW 35 lane, Miami, FL 33172.
February 12, 2005.018332N
Pioneer Logistics, Inc., 2300 Higgins Road, Suite 204, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007.
August 25, 2005.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 05-20014 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00384-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.V., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-01861

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellant appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to J.M.V. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the 

record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes 

that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04–03–00096–CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—

San Antonio 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental 

rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Counsel 

 1 The Honorable Peter Sakai is the presiding judge of the 225th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The 

order of termination was signed by Associate Judge Charles E. Montemayor.
04-12-00384-CV

- 2 -

provided appellant with a copy of the brief. Appellant was informed of his right to review the 

record and advised of his right to file a pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The Order of Termination signed by the trial court is affirmed. We grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no 

pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

PER CURIAM
Albert GERSING, Plaintiff, v. REAL VISION, INC., Defendant.

No. COA 17-1382

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Aly
        Musani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
        knowledge that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
        Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        upon request.
 
 
 /s/
        ALY MUSANI
 Aly
        Musani
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 December
        15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ANSWERS CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   Date: August 5, 2009 | /s/ Robert S. Rosenschein |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                             |                      |
|                             | Robert S. Rosenschein     |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer   |
Beth DESMOND v. The NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY and Mandy Locke

No. 132P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

John A. Bussian, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

James T. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Chynna T. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Desmond, Beth.

William M. Wilson, III, Attorney at Law, for Professor William Van Alstyne.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 3rd of May 2018 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
#### Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-56320.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 13, 2003.

Charles M. Sevilla, Esq., Law Office, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Brentford Ferriera, Matthew G. Monfor-ton, Esq., District Attorney-Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent Appellee.

Cliff Gardner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Fisher was recused.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 28, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 28, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0153. GEORGE M. NEMCHIK et al. v. TONY MICHAEL RIGGS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 151819142
----

**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending **December 31, 2013**, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), **I**, **Clifford T. Davis, Chief Executive Officer**of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: **March 24, 2014**

|   | **/s/ *Clifford T.Davis***                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| By:    | *__________________________*                  |
|   | **Clifford T. Davis Chief Executive Officer** |

----
ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 








 







 


Greentech Mining Inc.


1840 Gateway Dr. Suite 200


Foster City CA. 94404


 







 


May 10, 2013


 







 


 


Greenetech Mining International, Inc.


1840 Gateway Dr. Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404


Attention: Timothy Neher, Director







 


Ref: Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement


 


Mr. Neher


 


Greentech Mining, Inc. has agreed to amend the payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to our discussions the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 is extended to October 1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 is extended to November 1, 2013.


 


Best regards


 


s/s Matthew Neher


 


Matthew Neher


Chief executive Officer
James and Lara BARNHILL, Plaintiffs, v. Richard W. FARRELL and The Farrell Law Group, PC, Defendants.

No. COA17-402

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
SOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. DALAMAGAS, et al.

308A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 21, 2017

Daniel F.E. Smith, Robert J. King, III, Jonathan M. Shapiro, Attorneys at Law, for Soma Technology, Inc.

Sam McGee, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Desai, Hiren.

Paul J. Stevens, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Dalamagas, Photios, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 21st of November 2017 by Plaintiff to Withdraw Appeals:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of November 2017."
In the MATTER OF: E.J.V.

No. 392P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Susan Vaughan, for Vaughan, Susan.

Courtney S. Hull, Attorney at Law, for Dare County DSS.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Petitioner (Grandmother) on the 20th of November 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of November 2017 by Petitioner (Grandmother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56888-56889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold 
meetings at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on October 
5, November 2, and December 7, 2005. The purpose of these meetings is 
to discuss proposed projects under Title II of the Secure Rural Schools 
and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.

DATES: October 5, November 2, and December 7, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m.-12 noon.
    Location: USDA Service Center, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, 
California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Odle, Public Affairs Officer 
and RAC Coordinator, at the Shasta-Trinity National Forest 
Headquarters, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, CA, 96002. (530) 226-2494 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc0c2c9c1c8edcbde83cbc8c983d8de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513c3e353d341137227f3734357f2422">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 56889]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These meetings are open to the public. 
Opportunity will be provided for public input and individuals will have 
the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: September 23, 2005.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-19553 Filed 9-27-05; 10:32 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4634 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Federal law enforcement officers and firefighters to make penalty-free withdrawals from 

governmental plans after age 50. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2014 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Federal law enforcement officers and firefighters to make 

penalty-free withdrawals from governmental plans after 

age 50. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EARLY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTIONS TO FED4 ERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND 

5 FIREFIGHTERS IN GOVERNMENTAL PLANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

7 72(t)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend8 ed— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4634 IH

1 (1) by striking the period at the end and insert2 ing ‘‘, or’’, 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘means any employee’’ and in4 serting the following: ‘‘means— 

5 ‘‘(i) any employee’’, and 

6 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

7 clause: 

8 ‘‘(ii) any Federal law enforcement of9 ficer described in section 8331(20) or 

10 8401(17) of title 5, United States Code, 

11 any Federal customs and border protection 

12 officer described in section 8331(31) or 

13 8401(36) of such title, or any Federal fire14 fighter described in section 8331(21) or 

15 8401(14) of such title.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICATION TO DEFINED CONTRIBUTION

17 PLANS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 72(t)(10) of such 

18 Code is amended by striking ‘‘which is a defined benefit 

19 plan’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of 

22 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
May 6, 2013


 


[Name]


[Address]


 


Dear _____________,


 


This letter is to document our agreement concerning the consideration
ProUroCare Medical Inc. (the “Company”) will provide to you regarding the extension of your guaranty of our currently
outstanding loan with Crown Bank (the “Crown Loan”).


 


As consideration for your past guaranty of the Crown Loan for
the period from November 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, the Company will issue to you 291,670 warrants to acquire the Company’s
common stock. These warrants will be immediately vested.


 


As consideration for your future guaranty of the Crown Loan
for the period from April 1, 2013 to February 15, 2014, the Company will issue to you 295,313 warrants to acquire the Company’s
common stock. As these warrants are for a future period, they will vest over that future period, and that vesting will be subject
to adjustment should the loan be repaid, or the amount of your guaranty change. Accordingly, the monthly number of shares that
shall vest will be determined by applying the following formula, rounded up to the nearest whole share:


 


[Amount Guaranteed (defined below)] times
[0.008333] times [5]


 


The “Amount Guaranteed” shall be equal to the principal
amount of the Crown Loan guaranteed by you as of the first day of each month, plus any previous or future amounts loaned by you
to the Company (and not repaid by the Company in cash or equity) for the purpose of retiring Crown Loan principal. Note:
Since consideration for such loans from the Company is being made under this letter agreement, those loans will not be eligible
for additional consideration from the Company under other loan extension programs during the term of Crown Loan ending February
15, 2014 unless first deducted from the Amount Guaranteed for purposes of the above vesting calculation.


 


Initially, the Amount Guaranteed is the $450,000 principal amount
of the crown Loan plus $225,000 that has been loaned to the Company as of this date to reduce the principal amount of the Crown
Loan. The monthly number of shares vested (subject to future adjustment as defined above) shall be:


 


$675,000 times 0.008333 times 5 = 28,125


 


For the half month period ending February 15, 2014, the number
of shares scheduled to vest is 14,063.


 


All past and future warrants shall be five-year warrants, exercisable
at $0.50 per share, and be eligible for cashless exercise.


 


Thank you for your continued support!


 


	Sincerely,	 
	 	 
	Robert Rudelius	 
	Vice Chairman	 


 


 



    	 



    	 



    




  


If you agree to the above terms, please sign and date below,
and fax it back to Dick Thon at 952-698-4499 or email it to rthon@prourocare.com.


 


	 	 	 	 
	Signature	 	Date	 


 





	ProUroCare Medical Inc., 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite
    101, Eden Prairie, MN 55344	Phone: 952.476.9093  Fax: 952.698.4499
**Exhibit 21.0**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THEREGISTRANT**

**Parent**

TF Financial Corporation

| **Subsidiaries**                       | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Percentage  Owned** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|
| Third Federal Bank(a)                  |       |       | 100        | %                     |       | United States                           |       |
| TF Investments Corporation(a)          |       |       | 100        | %                     |       | Delaware                                |       |
| Teragon Financial Corporation(a)(b)    |       |       | 100        | %                     |       | Pennsylvania                            |       |
| Penns Trail Development Corporation(a) |       |       | 100        | %                     |       | Delaware                                |       |
| Third Delaware  Corporation(a)(b)      |       |       | 100        | %                     |       | Delaware                                |       |

----

(a)           The operations of thissubsidiary are included in the consolidated financial statements contained inthe 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders incorporated herein by reference.

(b)          Third DelawareCorporation and Teragon Financial Corporation are wholly-owned subsidiaries ofThird Federal Bank.

----
STATE of North Carolina v. TWASJAY R. Brown, Defendant.

No. COA17-1062

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

NO ERROR.