alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.05

                                        
                              RED ROOF INNS, INC.
                                        
                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                      FOR
                         ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
                               FORMS 3, 4, AND 5




The undersigned director of Red Roof Inns, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and appoints Francis W. Cash, David L. Rea,
and Alan L. Tallis, collectively and individually, as his agents and
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to (a)
sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on his behalf and in his name,
place, and stead in any and all capacities with respect to the registration
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), including pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; (b) sign and file any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K; (c) sign and
file any and all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") covered by the Form 10-K; (d) sign
and file any or all Forms 3, 4, or 5 required to be filed by him with the
Commission under the Act, including pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act; (e)
sign and file any and all amendments to Forms 3, 4, or 5; and (f) do and perform
any and all other acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required;
and (2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant
hereto by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their
substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 25th day of February, 1999.



                                                   /s/ Edward D. Powers
                                                   --------------------
                                                   Edward D. Powers
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Transit Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 605
          - [Docket No. FTA-99-5082]
          - RIN 2132-AA67

# AGENCY:

Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of rulemaking; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 28, 2005, withdrawing a notice of proposed rulemaking relating to its School Bus Operations regulation. This document misidentified the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Martineau, 202-366-1936.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 28, 2005, in FR Doc. 05-1644 on page 4081, in the heading section, correct the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) to read:                    

 RIN 2132-AA67

Dated: January 28, 2005.

Scott A. Biehl,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Legislation and Rulemaking.

[FR Doc. 05-2022  Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-57-M
BPI 2013 10-Q - EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1 


BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.
2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the Bridgepoint Education, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) will have the same defined meanings in this Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Award Agreement”).


		
	I.
	NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT


Participant Name:                    
Address:                
You have been granted the right to receive an Award of Restricted Stock Units, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement, as follows:
Grant Number                                    
Date of Grant                                    
Number of Restricted Stock Units                        
Vesting Schedule:


Subject to any acceleration provisions contained in the Plan or set forth below, the Restricted Stock Unit will vest in accordance with the following schedule:
One hundred percent (100%) of the Restricted Stock Units will vest on the first (1st) anniversary of the Date of Grant.  
In the event Participant ceases to provide Service for any or no reason before the applicable vesting dates set forth above, then Participant's right to acquire any Shares hereunder with respect to any of the Restricted Stock Units that remain unvested as of the date Participant ceases to provide Service will immediately terminate.


By Participant's signature and the signature of the representative of Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (the “Company”) below, Participant and the Company agree that this Award of Restricted Stock Units is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement, including the Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Unit Grant, attached hereto as Exhibit A, all of which are made a part of this document.  Participant has reviewed the Plan and this Award Agreement in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Award Agreement and fully understands all provisions of the Plan and Award Agreement.  Participant hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Company upon any questions relating to the Plan and Award Agreement.  Participant further agrees to notify the Company upon any change in the residence address indicated below.











	
		
	PARTICIPANT:
	BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.

	 
	 

	_________________________________
	_________________________________

	Signature
	By

	 
	 

	_________________________________
	_________________________________

	Print Name
	Title

	 
	 

	Residence Address:


	 

	_________________________________
	 

	_________________________________
#### Christopher Jay JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-4661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jenny Scavino Sieg, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee.

ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.

Christopher Jay Jackson appeals a judgment for aggravated battery and the fifteen-year prison releasee reoffender sentence he received for the crime. Mr. Jackson has raised no issues regarding his conviction, and we therefore affirm the conviction. As to the sentence imposed, Mr. Jackson argues, and the State concedes, that the absence of a sentencing hearing transcript and the inability of the parties or the court to reconstruct the record require us to reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. *See Delap v. State,*350 So.2d 462 (Fla.1977).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CANADY and WALLACE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.2

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Adrian Calaza, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TIM Participações S.A.;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.       Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have:

 

a)       Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)       Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

d)       Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.       Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)       Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b)       Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:	April 10, 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9
- 0199 IN THE MATTER OF: S.G.
- H.M., JR.,

A Former Youth Under the Age of 18 ,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 21 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 16 2020

07/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0199
#### Corine CHEVES and Vincent Cheves, Appellant, v. EQUICREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee.

Nos. 5D02-2138, 5D02-2296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 15, 2003.

Vincent Cheves and Corine Cheves, Apopka, Pro Se.

Alan Rosenthal and Stephanie G. Kol-man of Adorno & Yoss, P. A., Miami, for Appellee.

ORFINGER, J.

Corine and Vincent Cheves appeal an order granting Equicredit Corporation’s motion to enforce its writs of possession following foreclosure of its mortgage encumbering the Cheves’ residence. Having carefully considered the record, we find no evidence that the trial court abused its discretion in enforcing the writs of possession. *See Tilden Groves Holding Corp. v. Orlando/Orange County Expressway,*816 So.2d 658, 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). It was the trial court’s duty, not this court’s, to determine whether or not the Cheveses were entitled to relief from the judgment of foreclosure. *Church v. Strickland,*382 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that the Cheveses were not entitled to be relieved from the foreclosure judgment, and that Equicredit was entitled to possession of the property. Accordingly, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12(a)2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Telemig Celular Participacoes S.A. (the "Company") is filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 2002 (the "Report").

         I, Joao Cox Neto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Joao Cox Neto
-----------------
Joao Cox Neto
Chief Financial Officer
May, 7, 2003
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Spine Pain Management, Inc,
formerly known as “Versa Card, Inc.”  (the "Company") for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, William F. Donavan, Interim Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify
that:





The
Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





The
information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 31st day of
March, 2010.





/s/ William F. DonavanBy:
      William F. Donavan, Interim Principal Financial OfficerDate:
      March 31, 2010
#### Richard M. CROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-0225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 30, 2003.

Richard M. Cross, pro se, appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Adams v. State,*801 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); *Zanzarella v. State,*730 So.2d 704 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2018

Jay H. Ferguson, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorneys at Law, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James E. Williams, Jr., Burton Craige, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Irving Joyner, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Assocation for Public Defense.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Jin Hee Lee, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorneys at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Robert L. Walker Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."

Beasley, J. rescued
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InterMountain Community Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Curt
Hecker, Chief Executive Officer, and David W. Smith, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 13, 2004

        /s/ Curt Hecker                                    /s/ David W. Smith
-------------------------------                         ------------------------
Curt Hecker                                             David W. Smith
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       28
Exhibit 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Unitholders of Regency Centers, L.P. and the Board of Directors of
Regency Centers Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-58966) on Form S-3 of Regency Centers, L.P., of our report dated January 31,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Regency Centers, L.P. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2001, and related schedule, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Regency Centers,
L.P.



                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

                                    KPMG LLP



Jacksonville, Florida
March 20, 2002
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4568 

To enhance the ability of smaller reporting companies to access the public 

securities markets by allowing forward incorporation by reference on 

Form S–1, to add listing and registration of a class of common equity 

securities on a national securities exchange as an additional basis for 

satisfying the requirements of General Instruction I.B.1. of Form S– 

3, and to remove such listing and registration as a requirement of 

General Instruction I.B.6. of such form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2014 

Mrs. WAGNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To enhance the ability of smaller reporting companies to 

access the public securities markets by allowing forward 

incorporation by reference on Form S–1, to add listing 

and registration of a class of common equity securities 

on a national securities exchange as an additional basis 

for satisfying the requirements of General Instruction 

I.B.1. of Form S–3, and to remove such listing and 

registration as a requirement of General Instruction 

I.B.6. of such form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4568 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Free3 dom to Grow Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FORWARD INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR 

5 FORM S–1. 

6 Not later than 45 days after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

8 shall revise Form S–1 so as to permit a smaller reporting 

9 company to incorporate by reference in a registration 

10 statement filed on such form any documents that such 

11 company files with the Commission after the effective date 

12 of such registration statement. 

13 SEC. 3. EXPANDED ELIGIBILITY FOR USE OF FORM S–3. 

14 Not later than 45 days after the date of the enact15 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

16 shall revise Form S–3— 

17 (1) so as to permit securities to be registered 

18 pursuant to General Instruction I.B.1. of such form 

19 provided that either— 

20 (A) the aggregate market value of the vot21 ing and non-voting common equity held by non22 affiliates of the registrant is $75,000,000 or 

23 more; or 

24 (B) the registrant has at least one class of 

25 common equity securities listed and registered 

26 on a national securities exchange; and 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4568 IH

1 (2) so as to remove the requirement of para2 graph (c) from General Instruction I.B.6. of such 

3 form. 

4 SEC. 4. SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY DEFINED. 

5 In this Act, the term ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ 

6 has the meaning given such term in section 230.405 of 

7 title 17, Code of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Bettie Louise VICKERS v. CITY OF GULF SHORES.

CR-01-0763.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 30, 2002.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 2002.

Certiorari Denied Dec. 13, 2002 Alabama Supreme Court 1020054.

James Warren May, Foley, for appellant.

*1044Michael A. Dasinger III, Robertsdale, for appellee.

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

WISE, J., concurs. BASCHAB and SHAW, JJ., concur in the result. COBB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.

COBB, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the unpublished memorandum stating that Bettie Louise Vickers’s challenge to the trial court’s failure to give requested jury charges 5, 6, and 7 was not preserved for appeal or that Vickers failed to obtain an adverse ruling from the trial court.

The record reflects that Vickers submitted written requested jury charges to the trial court before the Court gave its oral charge to the jury. The trial court read the requested charges and marked “refused” next to charges 5, 6, and 7. After the trial court’s oral charge to the jury, Vickers made specific objections to the trial court’s failure to charge the jury as requested in the written charges refused by the trial court; the trial court did not respond to those specific objections. I believe the trial court clearly understood the grounds for Vickers’s requested charges. Thus, I believe the trial court’s marking the requested written charges “refused” was a sufficient adverse ruling from which Vickers could appeal and that no further ruling was required from the court. I concur with the remainder of the unpublished memorandum.