alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 2000 and Statements of Income for the twelve months
ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,141,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,572,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,179,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,410,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,330,000
<PP&E>                                       7,078,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,909,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,432,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,756,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,063,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,322,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,432,000
<SALES>                                     47,496,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,496,000
<CGS>                                       29,127,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,127,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,582,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,451,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,751,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,700,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,700,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92



</TABLE>
----

|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act  of 1934;and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/      Dennis M. Terry                              |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Dennis      M. Terry                                  |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer            |
|   |   |                                                  |   |
|   |   |                                                  |   |
|   |   |                                                  |   |
|   | By:    | /s/      Darlene F. McDonald                          |   |
|   |   | Darlene      F. McDonald                              |
|   |   | Senior      Vice-President and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/ James A. Thomas                    
|                       |  | James A. Thomas Chief Executive
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ken WALKER, Ted P. Pearce, Mark Street, and Warren C. Bickers v. DRIVEN HOLDINGS, LLC

No. 395A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed June 8, 2018

Milazzo Webb Law, PLLC, Charlotte, by David C. Boggs and Colin R. Stockton, for plaintiff-appellants.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, L.L.P., Raleigh, by Michael W. Mitchell and Jackson Wyatt Moore, Jr. ; and White & Case LLP, by Glenn M. Kurtz, pro hac vice, and Kimberly A. Haviv, pro hac vice, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    ERIC N. SMITEric N. Smit  September 28, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4270 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4270

   To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated 
pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities 
  Investor Protection Corporation, and the Public Company Accounting 
            Oversight Board is not subject to the sequester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2014

  Mr. Renacci (for himself, Mr. Himes, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Peterson, Mr. 
    Murphy of Florida, Mr. Flores, and Mr. Sherman) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated 
pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities 
  Investor Protection Corporation, and the Public Company Accounting 
            Oversight Board is not subject to the sequester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

    Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does not apply with respect to the funding 
of--
            (1) the standard setting body designated pursuant to 
        section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s(b));
            (2) the Securities Investor Protection Corporation; or
            (3) the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re Appeal of Decision of DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 02-PDB-126.

No. 2003-OB-0282.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Smith, Antoine L.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 02-PDB-126.

Leave to appeal denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., recused.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7131** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. BILLY R. MCCULLERS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00049

- RBS

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLE R, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Billy R. McCullers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy R. McCullers, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion filed in his criminal case under Fed R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) to relate back a new claim to his previously adjudicated and denied 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. A ccordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McCullers , No. 4: 07

- cr - 00049

- RBS

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1 LTIP Amendment








Exhibit 10.1 




LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
OF TRANSOCEAN LTD.
(As Amended and Restated as of February 12, 2009)
First Amendment
Transocean Ltd. (the “Company”), having reserved the right under Section 6.3 of the Long-Term Incentive Plan of Transocean Ltd., as amended and restated effective as of February 12, 2009 (the “Plan”), to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective May 18, 2013, to replace the last sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan with the following sentence:


“Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 3.1(b) and 3.2(c) above, Restricted Shares and Deferred Unit awards to Eligible Directors may vest at such time as the Board may designate in its sole discretion, but not earlier than the first to occur of (a) the first anniversary of the initial date of such award or (b) the date of the Annual General Meeting next following the initial date of such award.”
Attested to by the Secretary of Transocean Ltd. as adopted by the Board of Directors of Transocean Ltd. this 18th day of May, 2013.






By: /s/ Philippe A. Huber                    
Philippe A. Huber
Kaylyn Michelle Scruggs MITMAN, Plaintiff, v. Lyman Charles SHIPLEY, III, Defendant.

No. COA18-173

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

REVERSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Joanna Roberta MADONNA

No. 398P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

George B. Currin, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Madonna, Joanna Roberta.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Deborah A. Shandles, Assistant District Attorney.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of November 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
ELI GLOBAL, LLC, et al. v. James A. HEAVNER

No. 12PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Kendal B. Reed, Attorney at Law, for Eli Global, LLC, et al.

James H. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Richard M. Hutson, II, Attorney at Law, Durham, Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for Heavner, James A.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration the motion to dismiss the appeal is allowed. It is further ordered that the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this *1st* day of *March*, 2018.

Jackson, J., recused
ACCEPTED

06-15-00074-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

8/6/2015 3:46:51 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 8/6/2015 3:46:51 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visual Management Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jason Gonzalez, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |     |                         | 
|------------------ | --- | ----------------------- | 
|Date: May 20, 2010 | By: | /s/ Jason Gonzalez      | 
|                   |     |                         | 
|                   |     | Jason Gonzalez          | 
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer | 

21

---
#### Terry and Ruth CLELAND v. CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, et al. Terry and Ruth Cleland v. City of Lake Charles, et al.

No. 2003-C-1380.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Lake Charles City of et al.; Jones, Gerard; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Cal-casieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 92-5347; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No(s). 02-805, 01-1463.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant the writ.
WILKES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; Dale R. Folwell, State Treasurer (in official capacity only); Steven C. Toole, Director, Retirement Systems Division (in Official Capacity Only), Respondents.

No. COA17-1018

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Carl Ray POORE, Jr.

227P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 23, 2018

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Poore, Carl Ray (Jr.)

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of July 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of July 2018."
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David G. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ David G. MooreDavid G. Moore Chief Executive Officer


September 16, 2002




91
ACCEPTED

12-14-00279-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/20/2015 3:53:08 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/20/2015 3:53:08 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”),the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Diana S. Ferguson   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Diana S. Ferguson       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | May 15, 2007            |

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# Agency:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# Date and Time:

Friday, October 7, 2005, 9:30 a.m.

# Place:

Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2226, Washington, DC 20515.

## Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes of September 16, 2005 Meeting

III. Announcements

IV. Commission Briefing: The Voting Rights Act
    - Introductory Remarks by Chairman
    - Speakers' Presentations
    - Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director

V. Staff Director's Report

VI. State Advisory Committee Issues
    - Working Group on SAC Reform
    - Elementary and Secondary School Desegregation Project

VII. Management and Operations
    - Commission Meeting Dates for Calendar Year 2006
    - Report on John G. Roberts, Jr., Civil Rights Record
    - September 15th Report to Congress on Commission Reforms

VIII. Future Agenda Items

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Terri Dickerson, Press and Communications (202) 376-8582.

Christopher Byrnes,

Acting Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 05-19656 Filed 9-27-05; 4:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
#### Welburn L. SUTTON, Appellant, v. Donald RUMSFELD, Secretary for the Department of Defense, Appellee.

No. 02-3349.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 10, 2003.

Filed: Sept. 18, 2003.

*949Steven D. Horak, argued, Olathe, KS, for appellant.

Joel F. May, argued, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Welburn Sutton appeals the district court’s dismissal of his employment discrimination claims, arising out of the promotion of other employees to six Computer Specialist GS-13 positions, and to Head of the Test Branch (Head of Test), a GS-13 position. For reversal Sutton argues that the district court clearly erred in finding that his charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Office (EEO) did not include five of the Computer Specialist promotions or the Head of Test promotion, and in finding that his charge was untimely as to the sixth Computer Specialist promotion. Upon careful review of the record, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

We conclude that alleged discrimination regarding the Head of Test promotion grew out of or was reasonably related to the discrimination alleged in Sutton’s EEO charge — which claimed that defendant refused to promote employees who are black or over 50 above the GS-12 level and that defendant discriminated against men as well. *See Stuart v. Gen. Motors Corp.,*217 F.3d 621, 631 (8th Cir.2000) (administrative complaints are to be construed liberally, and plaintiff “may seek relief for any discrimination that grows out of or is like or reasonably related to the substance of the allegations in the administrative charge”); *Lyons v. England,*307 F.3d 1092, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (charge allegation that agency had denied black men promotion generally and had specifically denied plaintiffs promotion in 1996 was reasonably related to allegations concerning other promotions, because, inter aha, charge reflected plaintiffs’ original theory of case — that they were disadvantaged in ability to obtain promotion above GS-12 level); *Osborn v. United States,*918 F.2d 724, 730 (8th Cir.1990) (standard of review).

We further conclude that Sutton’s administrative charge was timely as to the Computer Specialist position filled by Lucretia Abrego, because he contacted an *950EEO counselor (through his union representative) within 45 days of the effective date of the promotion. *See*29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) (2002). However, we find that the charge was untimely as to the other five Computer Specialist promotions, which were effective on an earlier date, and therefore we affirm the dismissal of those claims. *See Villines v. Gen. Motors Corp.,*324 F.3d 948, 952 (8th Cir.2003) (court of appeals may affirm on any basis supported by record).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment as to the five Computer Specialist positions that were not filled by Abrego, but we reverse as to the Head of Test promotion and Abrego’s Computer Specialist promotion, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.