alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013336EN.01001401.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/14

---

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2013 — PROAS v European Commission

(Case T-495/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for penetration bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Annual market-sharing and price-fixing agreements - Translation of the statement of objections - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Reasonable time - Res judicata)

2013/C 336/27

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Productos Asfálticos (PROAS), SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented: initially by C. Fernández Vicién, A. Pereda Miquel and P. Carmona Botana, then C. Fernández Vicién and A. Pereda Miquel and finally C. Fernández Vicién, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agent, assisted initially by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer, and M. Heenan Bróna, Solicitor, then J. Rivas Andrés and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert, lawyers, and finally J. Rivas Andrés)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Decision C(2007) 4441 final of the Commission, of 3 October 2007, relating to a procedure of application of Article 81 (EC) [Case COMP/38.710 — Bitumen (Spain)], and the reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Dismisses the claim of the European Commission seeking an increase of the amount of the fine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the claim of the European Commission seeking an increase of the amount of the fine.

| 3. | Orders Productos Asfálticos (PROAS), SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Productos Asfálticos (PROAS), SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
**IN THE SUPREME**  **COURT OF THE**  **STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23**  **- 0682**  IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF J.F.R. , A Protected Person /Appellant , **ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S**

**MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY**  **BRIEF**
Having reviewed Appellant J.F.R.’s Motion fo r Extensio n of T ime to File Appellant’s Reply Brief and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s mo tion is GRANTED and her opening br ie f shall be filed on or before May 20, 2024. No f urther extensio ns will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0682
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00864

- CR

EX PARTE Julian BAZAN

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cou rt No. 2019CR1157

- W2

Honorable Frank J. Castro , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellant ’ s motion for rehearing is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED February 15

, 202 3

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTE D TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Robert VICKERS, Defendant.

No. COA17-1216

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

AFFIRMED.
T 

6 

O+FlCE.OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

_. 

Roerrablo Will Mmn Blohardroa 

AulrNa8 8ureaxy of mate 

Aumtln, Ton* 

Dwr8lrt 

rtt~0 rwtut ror 

fully 0oD61d.?od v thir d 

Quut 68 follrnt 

to knew wheahu it 

~~$lolr lSa&, Vortttb~~a AMotatod Tax88 Cirll 8t6tuwa, road* 68 rollorrt 
Bonorablfe Kill idann iiiehardson, Page 2 

"The directors may adopt by-laws for the 

~overmmnt of ths corporation. Such by-lam 

-may be altered, ohenged or mended by a r;ajorits 

vote ot tke stockholders at any elactioc or 

spacial neetins ordered for thst pq~oes by 

the directors or truzqtees, on c ;iiritthri a?plication cf e naJo13i.y of Lhe stockholders or 

JQOLbsr5."
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                   |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                        |  | Name:                             |  | Curtis W. Mewbourne    
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | Title:                            |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
EXHIBIT 10.27


<PAGE>



                              AMENDED AND RESTATED

                      AGREEMENT RE APPLICATION OF DIVIDENDS

                             As of November 30, 1998

Grove Property Trust
598 Asylum Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06105

Dear Sirs:

          The  undersigned  acknowledges  that Grove Property  Trust, a Maryland
real estate  investment trust (the  "Company"),  has lent certain amounts to the
undersigned  pursuant  to a  Promissory  Note dated as of the dated  hereof (the
"Note") for the purpose of  facilitating  the purchase by the undersigned of the
Company's Common Shares of Beneficial  Interest,  par value $0.01 per share (the
shares so purchased by the undersigned, the "Shares").

          In  consideration of the foregoing,  the undersigned  hereby covenants
and agrees with the Company as follows:

               1. The undersigned  shall perform in all respects his obligations
under the Note in accordance with the terms thereof.

               2.  Until all  amounts  owed to the  Company  by the  undersigned
pursuant  to the Note have been repaid or  otherwise  satisfied,  all  dividends
which the  undersigned  is entitled to receive in respect of the Shares shall be
held by the  Company.  Such  amounts  shall  be  held  for  the  account  of the
undersigned to be applied in accordance with the terms hereof.

               3.  Dividends held by the Company shall be applied to the payment
of  interest  under the Note,  such  payment to be made to the  Company  for the
account of the  undersigned  on the  interest  payment date next  following  the
payment of the dividend.

               4. Any  amounts  held by the  Company  following  the  payment of
interest  in  accordance  with  the  preceding  paragraph  shall  be paid to the
undersigned  as promptly as practicable  following  calculation of the amount of
interest to be paid pursuant to the preceding paragraph.

               5. Upon  execution  and  delivery  hereof by the  Company and the
undersigned,  the Agreement re Application of Dividends dated as of November 30,
1998 between the Company and the undersigned (the "Original Agreement") shall be
superseded in its entirety by this Amended and Restated Agreement re Application
of Dividends.

<PAGE>
                                                                               2



          If the  foregoing  correctly  sets  forth the  agreement  between  the
undersigned  and the Company with respect to the subject matter  hereof,  please
sign the  enclosed  copy of this  letter  whereupon  it shall  become a  binding
agreement and the Original Agreement shall be of no further force and effect.

                                              Very truly yours,

                                              /s/ MUNAWAR CHEEMA

                                              Munawar Cheema

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

GROVE PROPERTY TRUST

By:      /s/ JOSEPH R. LABROSSE
    --------------------------------
         Name:    Joseph R. LaBrosse
         Title:   Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Tyrone PICKROM v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2062.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Pickrom, Tyrone;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 178,759; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36459-KH.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID JAMES HOLLENBACK JR.,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

AND CENTRE COUNTY COURT OF 

COMMON PLEAS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 22 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for a Writ of Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-26-2015

EEOC v. Allstate Insurance Co

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This March is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"EEOC v. Allstate Insurance Co" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 295.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/295
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 14-2700

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

 Appellant

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

(D.C. No. 01-cv-07042)

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Present: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA, and BARRY, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been 

submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby

O R D E R E D that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted in part and denied in 

part. The Clerk’s Office is hereby directed to amend the Court’s Opinion in the abovereferenced case, dated February 13, 2015, to remove John V. Gorman and Coleen M. 

Meehan from the list of attorneys representing plaintiff-appellant Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission. The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied.

BY THE COURT,

s/ Thomas M. Hardiman

Circuit Judge

Dated: March 26, 2015
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
      for
      the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert D. Heuchan, Chief Executive Officer of
      Third Century, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Third Century
      Bancorp.










/s/
      Robert D.
      Heuchan


Robert
      D.
      Heuchan


President,
      Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





May
      11,
      2006








The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
      and is not being filed for any other purpose.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAYNE ERVIN LAMBERT; ERVIN WAYNE LAMBERT, JR.,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-405)

Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for

Appellants. Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying

their motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lambert, No. CR-92-405 (D.S.C. Nov.

18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven Lipscomb, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WPT Enterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statements of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for WPT Enterprises, Inc., and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to WPT Enterprises, Inc., including its subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, WPTEnterprises, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting;5. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to WPT Enterprises, Inc.’sauditors and the audit committee of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s board of directors or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectWPT Enterprises, Inc.’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  August 22, 2005 /s/ Steven Lipscomb   Steven Lipscomb   President and Chief Executive Officer
1 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 16 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID L. SMITH, Attorney-Appellant. Nos. 96-1254 & 96-1256 (D.C. Nos. 96-DP-4 & 95-CC-5)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT 1
Before BRORBY, EBELand KELLY , Circuit Judges.
This entire case is sealed. For a copy of this decision, please see Patrick Fisher.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN T. KENNEDY,

Appellant,

v.

ALISON KENNEDY,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1080

[February 4, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Maxine Cheesman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502002DR001829XXXMB FA.

John T. Kennedy, Brasil, pro se.

Jeffrey Begens of Law Offices of Jeffrey Begens, P.A., Bonita Springs, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jimmy A. SEVILLA-BRIONES

No. 254P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jimmy A. Sevilla Briones, for Briones, Jimmy A. Sevilla.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of August 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of August 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

*185"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of December 2018."
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of WLG Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Jillings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Edmund Pawelko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 20, 2011
 
 
 By:
/s/Andrew Jillings

By:
/s/ Edmund PawelkoName: Andrew Jillings

Name: Edmund PawelkoTitle:   Chief Executive Officer

Title:   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MortgageIT Holdings, Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedSeptember  30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Glenn J. Mouridy, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |  |                          |  |                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------|--|--------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                     |  | By:                      |  |     /s/GLENN J. MOURIDY |
|      |  |      |  | GlennJ. Mouridy                             |
|      |  |      |  | Presidentand Chief Financial Officer        |
|      |  |      |  | November 15,2004                            |
|                          |

This certification accompanies theReport pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2564

RHEVA A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLOTTESVILLE SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,

Defendant.

No. 96-2692

RHEVA A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLOTTESVILLE SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant - Appellant,
2

and

THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,

Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CA-94-50-3-C)

Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rheva A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Leigh Guynn, Thomas

Edward Ullrich, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Rheva A. Williams appeals the district court's orders adopting

the reports and recommendations of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in this action challenging the termination of

her employment with the Charlottesville Public School System. The

School Board cross-appeals, challenging a single holding of the

district court. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Charlottesville Sch. Bd., No. CA-94-50-3-C (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1996; May

23, 1996). We deny the School Board's motion for certification of

a question to the Virginia Supreme Court because the issue is not

determinative of this appeal. See Boyd v. Bulala, 877 F.2d 1191,

1199 (4th Cir. 1989); Cross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 873

F.2d 75, 75 (4th Cir. 1989); see also Va. Sup. Ct. R. 5:42. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED