alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kirk
Stingley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November
23, 2009





/s/ Kirk
Stingley





Kirk
Stingley,


Chief
Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/       Walter Davis





Name:                   Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2011
IN RE: Charles Everette HINTON

449P11-20

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 11, 2018

Mr. Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of September 2018 by Plaintiff for Demand for Trial by Jury:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of September 2018."
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I,Wesley Whiting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dynadapt Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of April 30, 2003; and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 8, 2004


/s/Wesley Whiting
-----------------------
Wesley Whiting, President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4501 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4501

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the limits on 
           expensing of certain depreciable business assets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2014

  Ms. Kuster introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the limits on 
           expensing of certain depreciable business assets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Growth and Investment 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXPENSING CERTAIN DEPRECIABLE BUSINESS ASSETS.

    (a) In General.--Section 179(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(C), by striking ``$25,000'' and 
        inserting ``$250,000'', and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``$200,000'' and 
        inserting ``$800,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I. John B. Wadsworth,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blue Ridge Paper Products Inc. (the“registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal  control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 11, 2006
|  | **/S/  JOHN B. WADSWORTH** | ** ** |
|--|----------------------------|------------|

### John B. WadsworthChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Strategy and Budget (CSB) Meeting

Agency Holding Meeting: National Science Board.

Date and Time: October 11, 2005, 3 p.m.-3:45 p.m. (ET).

Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230, Public Meeting Room 220.

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Open Session (3 p.m.-3:45 p.m.)

    Discussion of CBS Input to the 2020 Vision for NSF Document.
    For information contact: Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer 
and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000, http://www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.
[FR Doc. 05-20159 Filed 10-3-05; 4:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50229 Summary Calendar

ROBERT K. HUDNALL , Plaintiff

– Appel l ant

v. WILLIAM DETHLEFS, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; RYAN C. HOLMES, Associate Dean of Students, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; CATIE MCCORRY

- ANDELIS, Associate Vice

- President and Dean of Students for University of Texas at El Paso; GARY EDENS, Vice

- President for Student Affairs for University of Texas at El Paso; MARIA CONTRERAS, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; JOHN C. LOYA, Chief Adminis t rator Officer for School of Liberal Arts, Individually an d Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; MARIA MICHEL, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; YOLANDA LEYVA, Doctor of Philosophy, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso; DOES 1

- 100; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO; JEFFREY SHEPPARD, Doctor of Philos o phy, Individually and Agent for University of Texas at El Paso,

Defendant s

– Appellee s

Appeal from the United States D istrict Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3 :13

- CV

- 365

Before HIGGINBOTHAM , JONES , and HIGGINSON , Circuit Judges

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 15, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50229 Document: 00512769156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2014No. 14

- 50229
PER CURIAM: * The court has carefully consider ed this appeal , but our consideration is marred by insufficient and conclusory briefing. Appellant has waived his claims on appeal by failing to adequately explain them and by failing to furnish
citations to the record. F.R.A.P. 28(a)(8 ); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 22 2, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)(citations to record are necessary; pro se appellants must brief argument s correctly to preserve them); Moore v. FDIC , 993 F.2d 106, 107 (5th Cir. 1993). Most of his arguments do not challenge the grounds for the district
court’s dis missal of each of his claims. Nevertheless , we find no reversible error of fact or law by the district court and affirm for substantially the reasons expressed in that court’s conscientious and well

- reasoned opinion.
AFFIRMED

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
2 Case: 14-50229 Document: 00512769156 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2014
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50478 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**German Zarzoza Moreno,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:19

- CR

- 259

- 1

Before **King, Costa,**  and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
German Zarzoza Moreno appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty plea convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841. He argues that the district court clearly erred in applying the drug premises

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 1, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50478 Document: 00516379891 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2022No. 21

- 50478

2 enhancement to his guidelines calculation pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(12). He notes that, to support the recommended enhancement, the presentence report (PSR) relied upon his request that a co

- defendant see if there was a premises to rent to use for a stash house.
The application of the § 2D1.1(b)(12) enhancement is reviewed de

novo , and the district court ’ s factual findings are evaluated for clear error.
United States v. Peterson , 977 F.3d 381, 392 (5th Cir. 2020). A factual finding which is “plausible in light of the record as a whole” is not clearly erroneous; rather, there is clear error where a “ review of the record results in a definite
and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Id

. at 396 ( interna l quotation marks and citation omitted ).
Section 2D1.1(b)(12) permits a two

- level increase for any defendant who “maintain[s] a premises for the purpose of manufacturing or distributing
a controlled substance

. . . .” § 2D1.1(b)(12). The manufacturing or distribution of a controlled substance “need not be the sole purpose for which the premises was maintained, but [it] must be one of the defendant’s primary or principal uses for the premises, rather than one of the defendant’s
incidental or collateral use s for the premises.” § 2D1.1(b)(12) cmt. n.17.

We may affirm an enhancement on any ground supported by the
record. United States v. Jordan , 851 F.3d 393, 399 (5th Cir. 2017) . Both the Government’s factual basis for Moreno’s pleas and the PSR indicated t hat
Moreno used his residence a number of times to distribute drugs. Accordingly, it is plausible in light of the record as a whole that drug distribution was one of the primary uses of his residence and that such use
was not incidental. See § 2D1.1(b)(1 2) cmt. n.17 ; Peterson , 977 F.3d at 396 ; see also United States v. Cervantes , 706 F.3d 603, 620

- 21 (5th Cir. 2013) . The district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50478 Document: 00516379891 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/01/2022
In the MATTER OF Ronald Wade MOAK, Respondent.

Appellate Case Nos. 2018-001706 2018-001709

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

October 2, 2018

**99ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of the Receiver pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court. However, pursuant to Rule 17(d), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, respondent may apply to this Court for reconsideration of the order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Lumpkin shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Mr. Lumpkin may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial **100institution that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent's mail and the authority to direct that respondent's mail be delivered to Mr. Lumpkin's office.

Mr. Lumpkin's appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  data  extracted from the financial
statements  of  State  Of  Franklin Bancshares, Inc. for the twelve months ended
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     2785509
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      133148
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            308000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               21440591
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    13988346
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      13301184
<LOANS>                                  114439773
<ALLOWANCE>                                (810303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           160178417
<DEPOSITS>                               132237626
<SHORT-TERM>                               4093000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        9770891
<LONG-TERM>                                 578615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   1301519
<OTHER-SE>                                12196766
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           160178417
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            8220542
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          2211556
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          10432098
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         5663933
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         6170489
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      4261609
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               181429
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           12724
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            3027264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1594902
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 1594902
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               1087097
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                    222
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            630324
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 1450
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           810303
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        810303
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T
LO TH A R K U STER, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t,
v. M I C H A E L W . F O L E Y , D i r e c t orof P l anni ng for the C ou nty of M aui(a s an i n d i v i du a l ) ; C HA R L E S VI L L AL ON , B ui l di ng I ns pe c t orf

orthe C ountyof

M aui ( a s ani n d i v i du a l ) ; T Y F UK UR OK U, E ng i neerfor the C ou nty of M aui(a s an i ndi vi dua l ) ; JA Y A R A K A W A , Z oni ng Inspec t or for the C ou nty of M aui(a s an in d iv idu a l) ; C O U N T Y O F M A U I , a g o v ern m en t alen t i ty, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 16552 D . C
. N os . 1: 07- C V
- 00264-

S O M- B MK 1: 07 -C V -002 65 - S O M- B MK D is tr ic t o f

H aw a ii, H o n o lu lu
ORDER

B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T he M em orandu m D i sposi t i on fi l ed on June 10 , 20 11 , i s am ended as fo l l o w s: O np a g e 6 , lin e 4 , in s e rt “v io latio n ” b e tw e e n“c o n s titu tio n a l” an d“K u s te r .” 

# FI LED JU N 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS