alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### E. B. Sweeney, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Decision Filed April 16, 1928.

*730
      *Purl G. Adams,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Collier v. State, 55 Fla. 7, 45 South. Rep. 752; Lamps v. State, 51 Fla. 51, 40 South. Rep. 180.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 29, 2008                                                              
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
STATE v. Kathryn Elizabeth ROLLAND

316P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Laura M. Cobb, Paul A. Tharp, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, for Rolland, Kathryn.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of September 2017 by Defendant for Addition to Record on Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-459 (Second Review)] 

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission determines,[2]                                          pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act),[3]                                          that revocation of the antidumping duty order on PET film from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

The Commission instituted this review on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5473), and determined on May 9, 2005, that it would conduct an expedited review (70 FR 30482, May 26, 2005). 

The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on September 29, 2005. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3800 (September 2005), entitled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film From Korea: Investigation No. 731-TA-459 (Second Review). 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 3, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff not participating.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             19 U.S.C. 1675(c).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 05-20204 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4520 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4520

      To require passenger aircraft to transmit GPS location data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2014

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require passenger aircraft to transmit GPS location data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aircraft Positioning Modernization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that when an aircraft crashes in an area far from 
radar, the aircraft and its flight recorder can be difficult to find, 
necessitating expensive search and rescue operations.

SEC. 3. GENERAL AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 91.609(c) of the Code of Federal Regulations shall be 
amended to require that the Global Positioning System coordinate 
information shall be periodically transmitted to a receiving facility 
at a time frequency of 30 minutes.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of this Act shall take effect three years following 
enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

COMMONWEALTH REIT

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of CommonWealth REIT (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $35,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $12,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
In the MATTER OF: S.P.

No. COA17-616

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

AFFIRMED.
(January 29, 2001)

#### Tayeb N. Abedin et al., Appellants, v Tynika Motors, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 698]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated June 23, 2000, as granted the defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Tayeb Nimmu Abedin on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and, *sua sponte,*dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Juliann Abedin.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the portion of the order which, *sua sponte,*dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Juliann Abedin is treated as an application for leave to appeal from that portion of the order, and leave to appeal is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Tayeb Nimmu Abedin on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The affirmation of Abedin’s treating orthopedist submitted in opposition to the cross motions for summary judgment stated that Abedin sustained permanent quantifiable limitations of motion in the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine. The medical opinion expressed by the treating orthopedist was based on his recent physical examination of Abedin, as well as his prior examinations shortly after the accident, and the objective physical tests performed on Abedin, which were properly before the court *(see, Grossman v Wright,*268 AD2d 79, 84; *Zalduondo v*
      *596
      *Lazowska,*234 AD2d 455; *Cesar v Felix,*181 AD2d 852, 853). This evidence was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with regard to Abedin’s allegation that he sustained a serious injury.

The Supreme Court also erred in dismissing, *sua sponte,*the complaint insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Juliann Abedin, as neither of the defendants moved for that relief *(see, Dunham v Hilco Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 425, 430; *Marshall v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*186 AD2d 542; *Conroy v Swartout,*135 AD2d 945). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Aaron Ross TAYLOR

No. 237P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Taylor, Aaron Ross.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of August 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st of August 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of August 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order *288was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
June 14, 2011




American Eagle Energy, Inc.


27 North 27th Street, Suite 21G


Billings, Montana 59101


Attention: Richard Findley





NextEra Energy Gas Producing LLC


1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5550


Houston, Texas 77002


Attention: Michael Jessop





RE:         Purchase and Sale Agreement


Second Closing


Divide County, North Dakota





Gentlemen,





This Amendatory Letter Agreement (this “Amendment”), once executed by all parties, shall constitute an Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated May 17, 2011, and shall be incorporated into said Agreement.





American Eagle Energy Inc., Eternal Energy Corp., and NextEra Energy Gas Producing LLC hereby agree to amend the captioned Agreement as follows:





1.     The first paragraph of Article 2.1 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:





2.1 Purchase Price. The Purchase price for the Assets shall be $959,000 (the “Purchase Price”), which represents a purchase price of $1,750 per Net Acre (the “Per Net Acre Price”), multiplied by the approximately 1096 aggregate Net Acres covered by the Leases, multiplied by the 50% of Sellers right, title and interest being acquired by Buyer.




1





If these changes meet with your approval please execute in the space provided below.  Should you have any questions please feel free to call the undersigned.





Sincerely,Brad ColbyPresident





NextEra Energy Gas Producing LLCBy:Name:
Lawrence A. Wall, Jr.Title:
President
  AGREED and ACCEPTED this ________ day of June, 2011.  American Eagle Energy Inc.By:Name:
Richard FindleyTitle:
PresidentAGREED and ACCEPTED this ________ day of June, 2011.




2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Christopher Allen Neighbors

, * From the 161st District Court

of E ctor County,

Trial Court No. B

- 22

- 0103

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 329

- CR * May 9 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Williams, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment s below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment s of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.12
















CONSENT OF ROSE-ANNE BOUCHARD







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Rose-Anne Bouchard, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Rapport technique et recommandations, Campagne d’exploration 2012, Projet Nichicun, Mines Virginia inc.” completed in February 2013; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance Program, Trieste Project, Québec, Virginia Mines Inc.” completed in January 2013




concerning mineralized material in the Nichicun and Trieste properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Nichicun property, under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.4.4 Geological Setting; 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.4.6 Mineralization” and for the Lac Gayot property, under headings “3.5.4 Geological Setting, 3.5.5 Exploration and Drilling, and 3.5.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,













			
	/S/ Rose-Anne Bouchard

	 
	 

	Name:

Rose-Anne Bouchard

Geologist in training

	 
	 









May 13, 2013
#### Charles D. Haines, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. P. A. Vans Agnew, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 15, 1928.

*Henry L. Everett*(Miami), *H. S. White*and *Wilson & Boyle,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*G. P. Garrett,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, *950ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 26, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00820

- CV

Buddy CASTEEL and Jaret B. Casteel, Appellant s

v.

Amelia STAYTON and Ray Baugh, App ellee s

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 3228

- DC Honorable Watt Murrah, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for temporary injunction entered prior to trial on November 17, 2014 . In a related case, appellant filed an appeal

from the trial court’s final judgment entered on January 28, 2015 . In that case

, the trial court granted

a new trial on its own motion on February 28, 2015 . Therefore, this Court dismissed the appeal on March 25, 2015

. The underlying circumstances , passage of time and procedural pos ture of this appeal from the order denying temporary injunction create an issue whether this court’s review is still needed or

whether it is moot. Appellate courts cannot review a temporary injunction that has become moot, as any opinion would constitute a n impermissible advisory opinion. See Nat’ l Collegiate Athletic

Ass oc. v. Jones , 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) ; Reagan Nat’l Adver. v. Vanderhoof Family Trust

, 82 S.W.3d 366, 371 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2002, no pet.) (basis of temporary injunction was no longer at issue). For this reason, appellant shall file a letter advisory on or before 10 days from the date of this order advising this court : (1) whether he still occupies the property at issue : (2) if appellant does occup y the subject property, whether such tenancy will continue until conclusion of the new

trial

, and ; (3) if appellant does not occupy the subject property, whether any harm the injunction was intended to prevent

, or any threat of a permanent loss of property that served as a basis for the injunction

, is still an issue

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Peter M. BUKACHESKI, C.O. and Brad A., etc., Appellants, v. BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE, Appellee. Florida Association of Orthotists and Prosthetists and Morris Gallo, Appellants, v. Florida Department of Health, Board of Physical Therapy Practice, Appellee. Board of Orthotists and Prosthetists, Appellant, v. Board of Physical Therapy Practice and Nick Galvez, Appellees.

Nos. 1D02-3457, 1D02-3464, 1D02-3473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

*285Mark K. Logan, Esq. of Ballard *&*Logan, P.A., Tallahassee, for Peter M. Bu-kacheski, C.O. and Brad A. Gallo, C.P.O.

Martin R. Dix, Esq. of Katz, Rutter, Alderman, Bryant & Yon, P.A., Tallahassee, for The Florida Association of Ortho-tists and Prosthetists and Morris Gallo.

Charlie Christ, Attorney General, M. Catherine Lannon, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Board of Or-thotists and Prosthetists.

Donna Erlich, Assistant General Counsel for Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Board of Physical Therapy Practice.

Thomas A. Sheehan, III, Esq. and Marshall J. Osofsky, Esq. of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Raymond & Sheehan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for amicus curiae The Florida Physical Therapy Association.,

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration, this Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction to consider these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See*120.68(1), Fla. Stat. (2001).

DISMISSED.

LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., Concur; WOLF, C.J., Concurs With Written Opinion.

WOLF, C.J.,

Concurring.

The dismissal of this action shall not be construed as approval of the actions of the appellees, nor should this dismissal be construed to preclude any other administrative or civil action which may be available to appellants.
STATE v. James H. TERRELL, Jr.

55A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 23, 2018

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General.

G. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, James Howard Terrell, Jr., Michele A. Goldman, Attorney at Law, for Terrell, James Howard (Jr.)

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of February 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of February 2018."
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01
                                        
                              RED ROOF INNS, INC.
                                        
                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                      FOR
                         ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
                               FORMS 3, 4, AND 5




The undersigned director of Red Roof Inns, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and appoints Francis W. Cash, David L. Rea,
and Alan L. Tallis, collectively and individually, as his agents and
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to (a)
sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on his behalf and in his name,
place, and stead in any and all capacities with respect to the registration
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), including pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; (b) sign and file any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K; (c) sign and
file any and all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") covered by the Form 10-K; (d) sign
and file any or all Forms 3, 4, or 5 required to be filed by him with the
Commission under the Act, including pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act; (e)
sign and file any and all amendments to Forms 3, 4, or 5; and (f) do and perform
any and all other acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required;
and (2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant
hereto by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their
substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 25th day of February, 1999.



                                                   /s/ Thomas E. Dobrowski
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Thomas E. Dobrowski