alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                                  |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Corinthian Schools, Inc.                                          |  | Delaware                     
|Rhodes Colleges, Inc.                                             |  | Delaware                     
|Rhodes Business Group, Inc.                                       |  | Delaware                     
|Florida Metropolitan University, Inc.                             |  | Florida                      
|Corinthian Property Group, Inc.                                   |  | Florida                      
|Grand Rapids Educational Center, Inc.                             |  | Michigan                     
|National School of Technology, Inc.                               |  | Florida                      
|Ward Stone College, Inc.                                          |  | Florida                      
|Titan Schools, Inc. (formerly known as WyoTech Acquisition Corp.) |  | Delaware                     
|MJB Acquisition Corp.                                             |  | Wyoming                      
|Pegasus Education, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware                     
|Career Choices, Inc.                                              |  | California                   
|Sequoia Education, Inc.                                           |  | California                   
|Ashmead Education, Inc.                                           |  | Washington                   
|Eton Education, Inc.                                              |  | Washington                   
|ECAT Acquisition, Inc.                                            |  | Delaware                     
|CDI Education USA, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware                     
|CDI Career Development Institutes Limited                         |  | Canada                       
|Career Canada C.F.P. Limited                                      |  | Canada
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Cyber  Merchants  Exchange,  Inc.  Annual Report on Form
10-KSB  for the year  ended  June  30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Frank S.  Yuan,
Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1)    Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

       (2)    The  information  contained  in such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB
              fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition
              and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Frank S. Yuan
     -------------------
         Frank S. Yuan
Chief Executive Officer and Director
September 23, 2004

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBER MERCHANTS EXCHANGE, INC. AND
WILL BE  RETAINED  BY  CYBER  MERCHANTS  EXCHANGE,  INC.  AND  FURNISHED  TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 07-0457

((((((((((((((((

Linda Thomas, Individually And As Personal Representative Of The Estate Of Damon Hollimon, Deceased And Ashley Dominque Hollimon, Individually, Petitioners

v.

Institutional Division of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Glenda Pierson, Respondents

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The agreed joint motion to abate, filed on February 28, 2008, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until **May 5, 2008**, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings.

Done at the City of Austin, this 5th day of March, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

November 18, 2005

Mr. M. Ryan Kirby

The Law Firm of Timothy C. Anderson, PLLC

3100 Phoenix Tower

3200 Southwest Freeway

Houston, TX 77027

Mr. Savio Mathew

4106 Bluestone Ct.

Missouri City, TX 77459

RE:Case Number:  03-0831

Court of Appeals Number:  14-02-01254-CV

Trial Court Number:  767190

Style:YUSUF SULTAN, D/B/A U.S. CARPET AND FLOORS

v.

SAVIO MATHEW

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice Brister and Justice Willett not sitting)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 03-0831Page 1**
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

*390The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to admit Jin Hee Lee Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
#### Christopher Chance ROGERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 10-01-201-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Oct. 30, 2002.

Christopher Chance Rogers, pro se appellant.

Riley J. Simpson, Coryell County District Attorney, Gatesville, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

TOM GRAY, Justice.

Christopher Chance Rogers filed a lawsuit against the State of Texas and “John Doe: Falkner.”1 Rogers is an inmate at the Alfred D. Hughes Unit in Gatesville, Texas. The State filed a motion to dismiss which the trial court granted. After the trial court severed his claims against the State from his claims against Falkner, Rogers filed a notice of appeal. On appeal, Rogers made one general argument discussing why the dismissal was improper. We affirmed. *Rogers v. State,*slip op. No. 10-01-201-CV at 1, 2002 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002) (not designated for publication). A Motion for Rehearing En Banc was filed on September 23, 2002.

Rogers represented himself in this litigation. Although the Motion for Rehearing En Banc is hand written, it does not appear to have been prepared by Rogers. The motion appears to be signed by Russell E. Galer II.

The following statement is provided to explain why Galer is signing the motion and service:

> Next friend Russell E. Galer II files this petition pro bono for Christopher C. Rogers as he has been abducted by a flying saucer or the KGB or both. Gal-er is also indigent disabled and a non-licensed practioner.

> Service: Assistant Attorney General, Lou Rawls, Baseball Glove Mississippi.

We are not amused. This is a blatant violation of Rules 9.1(b), and 9.5(a), (d) and (e). Tex.R.App. P. 9.1(b), 9.5(a), (d), (e). It is not signed by an attorney nor the Party as required by Rule 9.1. Tex.R.App. P. 9.1. It does not appear to have been served in *31conformity with Rule 9.5(a) and does not evidence proof of service as required by Rule 9.5(d) and (e). Tex.R.App. P. 9.5(a), (d), (e). When we receive a document such as this it wastes valuable resources this court could devote to claims that are entitled to our attention. The Motion for Reconsideration En Banc is ordered stricken. Tex.R.App. P. 9.4(i). Rogers has five days from the date of this order to tender a document conforming to the rules of appellate procedure.

Justice VANCE would only strike the “motion”.

1

. Rogers also spells the defendant’s name "Faulkner” in his original petition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCO ANTRIONE CHERRY, JR., a/k/a Marco Antrione Cherry,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:11-cr-00071-RGD-FBS-1; 2:14-cv-00283-RGD)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marco Antrione Cherry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott 

Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marco Antrione Cherry, Jr., seeks to appeal the 

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Cherry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp. (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Stephen R. Kerrigan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that based on my knowledge:

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  August 12, 2005 | /s/ Stephen R. Kerrigan                               Stephen R. KerriganChief Executive OfficerCoinmach Service Corp. |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
STATE v. Alphonzo HARVEY

290A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 2018

Jeffrey William Gillette, Attorney at Law, for Harvey, Alphonzo.

Thomas O. Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 8th of November 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of November 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 19th day of December 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Michelle KISH, Employee, v. FRYE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Employer, Self-insured (Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Third-Party Administrator)

No. 180P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018.

William D. Acton, Jr., Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Kish, Michelle.

John F. Morris, Attorney at Law, Daniel O'Shea, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Frye Regional Medical Center, et al.

*278***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Netlist, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (“Netlist”) for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 (the “Report”),Chun K. Hong, president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board ofNetlist, and Gail Itow, vice president and chief financial officer of Netlist,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his orher knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Netlist, Inc.

 
| May 8, 2008 |   | /s/  Chun K. Hong                                             |
|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|             |   | Chun K. Hong                                                  |
|             |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of  the Board |
|             |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 |
|             |   |                                                          |
|             |   |                                                          |
| May 8, 2008 |   | /s/  Gail Itow                                                |
|             |   | Gail Itow                                                     |
|             |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                    |
|             |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                                 |

 

 

----
In the MATTER OF: C.S. & D.A.

No. COA18-160

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 3, 2018

AFFIRMED.
elgo_ex1020.htm


EXHIBIT 10.20


 





 


As of May 1, 2013








Victor Bronshtein, Ph.D.


Universal Stabilization Technologies, Inc.


4050 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Suite L


San Diego, CA 92121


 


Subject:  Further Extension to LOI dated January 7, 2011


 


Dear Victor:







The following is quoted from the executed LOI:








	
·  

	
No later than May 15, 2011, the Licensee and the Licensor will sign and begin executing a mutually agreeable one-year Pilot Development Project.








	
·  

	
Starting on the earlier of (i) May 15, 2011, or (ii) the first day after signing the Pilot Development Project, the Licensee will be obligated to pay the Licensor or at least CA$8333.33 per month for the work performed by Licensor under the Pilot Development Project. The Licensee and the Licensor will negotiate in good faith the goals, objectives and work product of the Pilot Development Project and the actual amount of the such monthly payment, which may be in excess of CA$8,333.33, depending on the scope of the work requested by Licensee.








	
·  

	
The Option Period for the exclusive option to enter into the License Agreement on the License Terms described below will expire on the earlier of (i) May 15, 2012 or (ii) the date the Licensee ceases to make monthly payments to the Licensor for the Pilot Development Project.












This Agreement was previously extended on May 4, 2012, August 15, 2012, October 15, 2012, and December 31, 2012. For good and valuable consideration the parties agree to extend and modify the Agreement as follows:








	
(i)  

	
The LOI dated January 7, 2011 is extended to June 30, 2013.








	
(ii)  

	
Monthly payments during the extension period will continue at the same rate through December 15th, 2012.








	
(iii)  

	
No cash payments will be due for the months of January- May, 2013.








	
(iv)  

	
Monthly payments, until the full exercise of the License Agreement in the amount of CA$8,333.33 will recommence no later than on June 15th 2013.








	
(v)  

	
 In lieu of cash payments for the months of January-May, 2013, the Company hereby agrees to issue the amount of 200,000 shares of its common stock par value $0.0001 in favor of Universal Stabilization Technologies, Inc.








	
(vi)  

	
All other terms and conditions remain the same.







 


 






	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Victor Bronshtein, PhD	 	 	/s/ Bob Hoerr	 
	
Victor Bronshtein, PhD 

	 	 	
Bob Hoerr

	 
	
President and Chief Scientific Officer


Universal Stabilization Technologies, Inc.  

	 	 	
President & CEO


Enterologics, Inc.
l)ISN1ISS; Opinion tiled November 14, 2012

in The

!ILi11rt uf ppiah’

.Fift1i 1itrirt uf Ixa at 1at1a

No. 05-i2-00970-CV

ROBERT BODY, III, Appellant

V.

ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-15051

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Murphy

Opinion By Justice Bridges

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee contends the appeal

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. By letter dated October 12, 2012, the Court informed

appellant that his $175 filing fee was past due. We instructed appellant to pay the required filing fee

within ten days. The Court cautioned appellant that failure to pay the fee within ten days would

result in dismissal of his appeal without further notice.

As of today’s date. appellant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly. we grant appellee’s

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.3(b) & (c).

L .

DAVID I.. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

1 20970F.P05
4tntrt nf ApptZl15

Fift1i Uitrirt ut rxa at 1a1hui

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

of Dallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. [)C-09-

V. 15051).

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices

O Neil! and Murphy. participating.

/ 7 7 .,••‘ /

DAViD L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

ROBERT BODY, 1.11, Appellant

No. 05-12-00970-CV

()NI WEST BA’JK. FSB Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date. the appeal is DISMISSED.

it is ORDERED that appellec. OneWest Bank, FSB, recover its costs of the appeal from

appellant. Robert Body. Ill.

Judgment entered November 14. 2012.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0090)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2206/03

by Gerhard Schmid (PSE) to the Commission

(2 July 2003)

Subject:   Action to confine marketing of specified products to the Czech Republic

Appendix A to Annex V to the Accession Act lists establishments in the Czech Republic that are permitted to delay until 31 December 2006 their compliance, in the area of veterinary legislation, with the structural requirements of the directives applicable respectively to fresh meat, fresh poultry meat, meat products, egg products and milk. Products originating from those establishments may, during that period, only be placed on the domestic market or used for further processing in domestic establishments.

I therefore ask the Commission what action can be taken, short of border checks on products, to ensure that the above products originating from the Czech establishments concerned have in fact been placed or processed only on the domestic market?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(8 August 2003)

The provisions of Annex V to the Accession Act provide specific rules guaranteeing that products from establishments granted a transitional period do not circulate in the internal market. In addition, Annex V entitles the Commission to adopt detailed implementing rules for the production, marketing (including special marking) and control of products originating from establishments granted a transitional period.

The Commission has initiated discussions on supplementary control measures to be applied to the production and marketing of products in transition with existing and new Member States.

----