alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4537 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts received for personal injuries or sickness resulting from service 

as a qualified public safety employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts received for personal injuries 

or sickness resulting from service as a qualified public 

safety employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS RECEIVED FOR PERSONAL INJURIES 

4 OR SICKNESS RESULTING FROM SERVICE AS 

5 A QUALIFIED PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE EX6 CLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(a)(4) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘or from 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4537 IH

1 service as a qualified public safety employee (as defined 

2 in section 72(t)(10)(B)),’’ before ‘‘or as a disability annu3 ity’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6542

GEORGE STEVENS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

G. K. WASHINGTON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00059-RLW)

Submitted: August 30, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George Stevens seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stevens has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Walter Columbus SIMMONS

No. 292P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Sterling Rozear, Attorney at Law, for Simmons, Walter Columbus.

Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Petition for Discretionary Review filed by the State on the 15th day of September 2017, the Court allows the State's Petition for Discretionary Review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in *State v. Sandra Meshell Brice* , 370 N.C. 244, 806 S.E.2d 32 (2017).

By order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of December 2017.
#### In the Matter of Aaron Holloway, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord et al., Respondents.

[720 NYS2d 355]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 6, 1999, which confirmed the determination of a Hearing Officer, dated May 14, 1999, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating institutional rules and imposing a penalty.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The Hearing Officer’s determination was administratively reversed on October 12, 2000. Therefore, the proceeding must be dismissed as academic. Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alex
Kam





Alex
Kam


Chief
Executive Officer and President


(principal
executive officer)





Date:
November 16, 2009





/s/
Pan-Rong Liu





Pan-Rong
Liu


Chief
Financial Officer


(principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer)





Date:
November 16, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Madison Avenue Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<page>					  EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 27, 2008
# Official Journal L 298/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.298.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 298 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5526 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.298.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 298

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5526 October 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. Samantha Rae XIONG

No. 183P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Xiong, Samantha Rae

Oliver G. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

*578Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of June 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of June 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
#### Charles Townsend, Appellant, *v.*Howard R. Kern and Louis C. Haughey, surviving partners of William A. Baeder, deceased, late trading as the William A. Baeder Glue Company, defendants; Hood Gilpin and the Fidelity Insurance, Trust and Safe Deposit Company, executors and trustees under the will of William H. Kern, deceased, garnishees. The Market and Fulton National Bank *v.*The Same. The Same *v.*The Same. People’s National Bank *v.*The Same. Allegheny National Bank *v.*The Same.

Argued March 30, 1899.

Appeals, Nos. 82, 83, 84, 85 and 90, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from judgment of G. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1898, No. 1015, sustaining exceptions to referee’s report.

Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, McCollum, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

*Charles F. Morgan, Jr.,*and *James Collins Jones,*with them *Francis F. Lewis, Lewin W. Barringer*and *Henry C. Todd,*for .appellants.

*John G. Johnson,*with him *Bernard Gilpin,*for appellees.

*89October 6, 1899:

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Fell,

These cases involve the same questions which have been considered in Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ National Bank of Pittsburg v. Kern et al., and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, ante, p. 67, the judgments are ail affirmed.
#### James C. STALLWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-2738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 14, 2003.

James C. Stallworth, appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Jordan v. State,*549 So.2d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

ALLEN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kion Tyearl DAIL

No. 233P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

Paul M. Green, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Dail, Kion Tyearl.

Jeremy D. Lindsley, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Attorney at Law, Durham, Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches.

Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within *380the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller.

Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers.

Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists.

Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense.

*360The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, October 6, 2005, 2 p.m. meeting open to the public. This meeting has been cancelled.

* * * * *

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-20295 Filed 10-4-05; 3:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
In the MATTER OF: S.S. & T.N.S.

No. COA17-1383

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
# C_2021490EN.01004402.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/44

---

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2021 — Mariani and Others v Parliament

(Case T-124/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 - Cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Thierry Mariani (Paris, France) and the 22 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and L. Tapper Brandberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Article 1 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office investigations (OJ 2020 L 437, p. 49).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | Mr Thierry Mariani and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Thierry Mariani and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

| 4. | The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.

---
----

Corrigendum of the Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty

(Official Journal of the European Union L 25 of 28 January 2005)

On page 74:

for:

               ‘On page 134 add the following text to the end of the document’;

read:

               ‘On page 128 add the following text to the end of part III of Annex 1’.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  April 30 , 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting,  President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, President

Dated:  October 31, 2005
Exhibit 11

               Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. ESOP
shares released or committed to be released are considered outstanding
while unallocated ESOP shares are not considered outstanding.  Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock
that then shared in the earnings of the Company.  Options to purchase
51,537 shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 1999 were not
included in the computation of common shares outstanding for purposes of
computing diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the
options exceeded the market price and thus the effect would have been anti-
dilutive.  The following table presents the basic and diluted earnings per
share computation for the year ended December 31, 1999.  The earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 1998 is not considered material,
since the Company's stock only began trading on December 21, 1998, and
therefor is not shown.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                           <C>
Basic and Diluted
Net income                                                    $403,001

Weighted-average shares outstanding                            545,481
Less net effect of unallocated ESOP shares                     (37,092)
                                                              --------
Weighted average shares outstanding as adjusted                508,389
                                                              ========

Earnings per share - basic and diluted.                       $   0.79
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50352

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE DELGADO-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-2097-ALL-PRM

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Enrique DelgadoPerez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk