alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1989]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--AAF Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 22, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the AAF Association, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, MESoft, 
Burbank, CA; and XVUE Ltd., Artemida-Attika, Greece have been added as 
parties to this venture. Also, Nucoda, London, United Kingdom has 
withdrawn as a party to this venture. In addition, BBC Technology has 
changed its name to Siemens Business Services, San Jose, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AAF Association, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 28, 2000, AAF Association, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
17, 2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 29, 2004 (69 FR 69391).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1989 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alex
Kam, CEO and Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Alex Kam
-------------------------------
Alex Kam
CEO and Principle Financial Officer
Date: November 9, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4659 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require disclosures to all cosigners 

and guarantors with respect to any consumer credit transaction or consumer lease that are required to be made to the consumer in connection 

with such transaction or lease, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010 

Mr. HODES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require disclosures 

to all cosigners and guarantors with respect to any consumer credit transaction or consumer lease that are required to be made to the consumer in connection with 

such transaction or lease, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Card Cosigner 

5 Protection Act of 2010’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4659 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURES REQUIRED. 

2 Section 621 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

3 1631(a)) is amended by striking the 2nd sentence and in4 serting the following new sentence: ‘‘In a consumer credit 

5 transaction or consumer lease involving more than 1 obli6 gor, the creditor or lessor, shall provide all disclosures re7 quired under this title with respect to any such transaction 

8 or lease to each obligor.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 31, 2010

p0324 

# Order

March 31, 2010

140133

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140133 COA: 286664 Genesee CC: 07-020780-FH DWAYNE EDWARD JUDE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 13, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Visual Management Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Frank Schmid, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May
      16, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Frank SchmidInterim
      Chief Financial Officer andSecretary
SAVE DAILY.COM, a California Corporation


 


A WHOLLY OWNED
SUBSIDIARY OF SAVE DAILY, INC., a Nevada Corporation


 


CONSENT TO ACTION
BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITHOUT A MEETING


 


The undersigned directors of SaveDaily.com, Inc., a California
corporation (the “Company”), acting pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 307 of the California General Corporation
Law (the “Corp. Code”) and the authority granted in the bylaws of the Company, do hereby adopt the following resolutions
by unanimous written consent, effective as of May 13, 2013.


 


WHEREAS, Michael Cronin, the Company’s CFO, tendered his
resignation on May 2, 2013 to be effective May 16, 2013.


 


WHEREAS, the Directors believe it is in the best interest of
the Company to accept the resignation of Michael Cronin.


 


WHEREAS, Jeff Mahony, the Company’s current CEO, is best
suited to assume the responsibilities of the CFO.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the resignation of Michael
Cronin as CFO of the Company is accepted effective May 16, 2013.


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Directors appoints
Jeff Mahony as CFO, effective May 16, 2013 to serve at the pleasure of the Board.


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Company authorizes and directs
the officers and directors of to prepare and file any documents and take any actions as are necessary or advisable in connection
with the resignation of Michael Cronin and appointment of Jeff Mahony.


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that any and all actions heretofore
taken by any officer of the Company in connection with the matters contemplated by the foregoing resolution be, and they hereby
are, approved, ratified and confirmed in all respects as fully as if such actions had been presented to the undersigned for their
approval prior to such actions being taken; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Unanimous Written Consent
of the Board of Directors may be executed by facsimile signature and any such facsimile signature shall be deemed to be an original
signature of the party or parties who executed in such manner; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Unanimous Written Consent
of the Board of Directors may be executed by affirmative electronic email response and any such affirmative email response shall
be deemed to be an original signature of the party or parties who executed in such manner; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Unanimous Written Consent
of the Board of Directors shall be maintained with the minutes of the proceedings of the Company’s Board of Directors and
the Shareholders.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 26, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 26, 2017

153936(44)

JESSICA A. DILLON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153936

v COA: 324902

Isabella CC: 2012-010464-NF

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Insurance Alliance of Michigan to 

file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if 

submitted on or before August 4, 2017.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLIE PATTERSON TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-99-99) Submitted: July 30, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlie Patterson Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Richard Barton Campbell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles P. Taylor appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Taylor , No. CR-99-99 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2001; Jan. 22, 2002); see United States v. Emmanuel , 288 F.3d 644, 649 (4th Cir. 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 26, 2010 |                               |
|----------------------|------------------------------------|
|                 |                               |   |   |
| By:                  | /s/ Gilmar Roberto Pereira Camurra |   |
|                 | Name:                              | Gilmar Roberto Pereira Camurra |   |
|                 | Title:                             | Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Arnold S. Lippa, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DOV
Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.


/s/ Arnold S. Lippa
-----------------------------------------------------
Arnold S. Lippa
Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE of North Carolina v. Elijah HAYWOOD, Defendant.

No. COA18-85

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

NO ERROR.
Cherie Lynn STYLES, Plaintiff, v. Todd David STYLES, Defendant.

No. COA18-257

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bertylar PEACE, Jr.

No. 413P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Ben G. Irons, II, Attorney at Law, for Peace, Bertylar (Jr.)

Ms. Christine Wright, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Bertylar Peace, Jr., for Peace, Bertylar (Jr.)

Mr. Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of December 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
#### Brooklyn Savings Bank, Plaintiff, *v.*Paul Xuereb et al., Defendants.*

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

May 27, 1943.

*689*Moses M. Cohen*for Paul Xuereb, defendant.

*Snedeker & Snedeker*for plaintiff.

*Harold J. Treanor*for Cross & Brown Company, defendant.

*

Cf. *Wolf*v. *Bell,*180 Misc. 587. — [Rep.

Hooley, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and upon the further ground that the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue by reason of the fact that the complaint seeks reformation of the contract to which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant was a true party. The defendant Xuereb was a building service employee in a building owned by the plaintiff and he brought an action in the Municipal Court under the provisions of an Act of Congress known as the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 *et seq.)*for overtime compensation together with an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, alleged to be due him by reason of the plaintiff’s failure to pay him overtime compensation in accordance with the provisions of the Act, plus a reasonable sum for attorney’s fees. The plaintiff brings this action to reform the " collective bargaining agreements under which Xuereb worked, upon the ground that the same were made under a mutual mistake. The complaint alleges that the weekly compensation specified in the collective bargaining agreements was intended to be in full payment for all hours worked both regular and overtime, and that the agreements contain the weekly wages for which the employees were to work and the regular weekly hours of their employment. What is now sought is that there be a specification of the hourly rate. Upon the facts pleaded, a cause of action is set forth. Complaints or counterclaims for reformation under similar conditions have been recently sustained. *(Garrity*v. *Bagold Corp.,*180 Misc. 120; *Adams*v. *Union Dime Savings Bank,*48 F. Supp. 1022; *Brooklyn Savings Bank*v. *Walmsley,*Supreme Court, Kings County, N. Y. L. J., April 29, 1943, p. 1686). This court *690agrees with the viewpoint contained in those decisions. If the contract does not contain what the parties intended there is a mutual mistake and if such mutual mistake causes a result which neither party intended, then reformation is proper. The motion is in all respects denied.
espi_ex1015.htm


 


Exhibit 10.15


 





 



May 13, 2013












Mr. David Dugas, Chairman


ESP Resources, Inc.


9595 Six Pines Drive Suite 6305


The Woodlands, TX  77380







To the Chairman and Board of Directors of ESP Resources, Inc.:







Please accept this as my letter of resignation as a member of the Board of Directors of ESP Resources, effective immediately.  Due to the increasing need for my time at my company, I am unable to commit the needed to time toward my role as a director of ESP Resources.







I have enjoyed working with you and wish the company the greatest success in the future.







Respectively,







/s/ William M Cox


William M. Cox
Exhibit 23.2 
 
                     Consent of Independent Auditors 
 
 
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782) and in the related Prospectus of  
Liberty Property Trust and Liberty Property Limited Partnership and to  
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3  
No. 333-22211) and in the related Prospectus of Liberty Property Trust  
and Liberty Property Limited Partnership of our report dated February  
17, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and  
schedule of Liberty Property Limited Partnership included in this Annual  
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996. 
 
 
 
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 
February 26, 1997                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

GERALD D. GOMEZ, 

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3089

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. NY0752100238-M-1. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Gerald D. Gomez moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

Case: 13-3089 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 04/26/2013
GERALD GOMEZ v. DVA 2

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s24 

Case: 13-3089 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 04/26/2013
#### Charles Thomas WEED v. STATE of Alabama.

CR-01-0286.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 30, 2002.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 2002.

Certiorari Denied Jan. 24, 2003 Alabama Supreme Court 1020189.

Paul M. Harden, Sr., Monroeville, for appellant.

*1043William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Elizabeth Ray Butler, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

BASCHAB, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW and WISE, JJ., concur.

COBB, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

COBB, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur with the majority’s resolution of the issues, and with the majority’s affir-mance of the appellant’s conviction. I write specially only to discuss additional facts that were relevant to my analysis of Issue I, regarding the denial of the challenge for cause as to prospective juror M.N.M.

When defense counsel challenged M.N.M. for cause, he stated only, *“I*think she would be uncomfortable.” (R. 65.) The prosecutor correctly observed that a state of “uncomfortableness” was not sufficient to support a challenge for cause, and he also stated that M.N.M. indicated that she could be fair and impartial. (R. 65-66.) The trial court agreed with the prosecutor and determined that defense counsel had not met the burden of establishing that she should be removed for cause. (R. 66.) The court further stated that defense counsel could ask M.N.M. if she could follow the evidence, but defense counsel did not ask M.N.M. any additional questions. (R. 66.)

A prospective juror can be struck for cause if a statutory ground exists or if the prospective juror indicates that he or she would be unable to render a fair and impartial decision because of the juror’s relationship with the victim. *Hamm v. State,*[Ms. CR-99-0654, Feb. 1, 2002] — So.2d —, — (Ala.Crim.App.2002). Defense counsel’s assertion that M.N.M. would be “uncomfortable” does not constitute a statutory ground, and M.N.M.’s answers to the voir dire questions do not establish that she could not render a fair and impartial verdict. Although the trial court afforded defense counsel the opportunity to question M.N.M. further, in the event that he could establish that she could not be fair and impartial, defense counsel did not avail himself of this opportunity. Moreover, as the majority correctly discussed, a trial court’s ruling on a challenge for cause is entitled to great weight, and is due to be upheld in the absence of a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.

Based on the record before us, I agree that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the challenge for cause as to M.N.M.