alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 090205B]


Large Coastal Shark 2005/2006 Stock Assessment Data Workshop; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notification of workshop; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a September 15, 2005, Federal Register 
notice that announced NMFS' large coastal shark (LCS) stock assessment 
Data workshop. That notice provided an incorrect address for the 
location of the workshop. This document provides the correct address. 
The date and time of the workshop remain unchanged.

DATES: The Data workshop will start at 1 p.m. on Monday, October 31, 
2005, and will conclude at 1 p.m. on Friday, November 4, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The correct address for the Data workshop is the Bay Point 
Marriott Resort, 4200 Marriott Drive, Panama City Beach, FL 32408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Neer at (850) 234-6541; or Karyl 
Brewster-Geisz at (301) 713-2347, fax (301) 713-1917.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    NMFS announced the Data workshop, the first of three workshops for 
the LCS 2005/2006 stock assessment, in a Federal Register notice on 
September 15, 2005 (70 FR 54537). The Data workshop will be held from 
October 31 - November 4, 2005, and will be conducted in a manner 
similar to the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process. 
Further details regarding these workshops are provided in the September 
15, 2005, notice and are not repeated here.

Need for Correction

    In the original Federal Register notice, the address for the Data 
workshop contains an error and is in need of correction.

Correction

    Accordingly, the September 15, 2005 (70 FR 54537) Federal Register 
notice concerning NMFS' LCS 2005/2006 stock assessment Data workshop 
that is the subject of FR Doc. 05-18355, is corrected as follows:
    On page 54537, column 3, in the ADDRESSES section, line 3, the 
language ``4200 Marriott Drive, Bay Point, FL'' is corrected to read 
``4200 Marriott Drive, Panama City Beach, FL''.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20018 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
STATE of North Carolina v. Marquice Alexander ANTONE, Defendant.

No. COA16-1203

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Tristan Philip HINES

No. COA17-1141

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Duval Lamont BOWMAN

No. 274A18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Bowman, Duval Lamont.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 27th of August 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 28th of August 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this *375Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 10.1


 


NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF MODIFICATION


TO PAYMENT SCHEDULE


 


The Director of the Department of Development
of the State of Ohio, now known as the Ohio Development Services Agency (the “Director”) and Intellinetics, Inc. (the
“Borrower”) entered into a Loan Agreement dated July 17, 2009 in the original principal amount of $1,012,500.00 evidenced
by a Cognovit Promissory Note dated July 17, 2009 (the “Note”).


 


The parties agree that the Loan Agreement
is hereby amended to authorize the Director to modify the amortization schedule from time to time, setting forth the amount of
principal, interest and service fee payable under the Note. Pursuant to the Company’s request, the Director has modified
the payment schedule pursuant to the amortization schedule noted as Amortization Schedule #3, which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A (the “Revised Schedule”). The Borrower agrees that this Revised Schedule shall supersede all prior amortization schedules,
whether in the Note or in an attachment to the Note, and the undersigned Company acknowledges and authorizes the Director to update
the schedule as an attachment to the Note. All other terms of the Note remain unchanged.


 





	 	BORROWER:
	 	 
	 	Intellinetics, Inc.,
	 	an Ohio corporation
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Matthew L. Chretien
	 	 
	 	Print: /s/ Matthew L. Chretien
	 	 
	 	Date:  3/12/2013


 






    	 



    	 



    

 





Exhibit A


 


Summary of Amortization Schedule #3


 


 


 


Effective March 12, 2013, Intellinetics and the Ohio State Development
Authority entered into a Notice and Acknowledgement of Modification to Payment Schedule (the “March 12, 2013 Modification
#1”) relating to the June 17, 2009 note payable issued by Intellinetics to the Ohio State Development Authority in the amount
of $1,012,500, bearing interest at a rate of 6.00% per annum. Pursuant to the March 12, 2013 Modification #1, the Ohio State Development
Authority deferred principal and interest payment for a six month period until December 31, 2013, with the next principal and interest
payment due on January 1, 2014.
Argued and submitted January 30,

affirmed April 24,

petition for review denied August 26, 2003 (335 Or 655)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PATRICK JUSTIN AUSTIN, *Appellant.*

00C54936; A114320

67 P3d 435

Susan F. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services, and Andy Simrin, Senior Deputy Public Defender.

Laura S. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*428PER CURIAM

Defendant was found guilty except for insanity of the crimes of attempted murder and first-degree burglary and received consecutive commitment terms to the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) totaling 40 years. This case presents the question of whether a total PSRB commitment term for multiple offenses, imposed pursuant to ORS 161.327(1), may equal the maximum sentence that a person found guilty except for insanity could otherwise have received for the offenses committed, including sentences imposed consecutively. We have decided that question adversely to defendant’s position in *State v.*Brooks, 187 Or App 388, 67 P3d 426 (2003). In this case, unlike in *Brooks,*defendant does not challenge the adequacy of the trial court’s findings in support of the commitment terms imposed. The trial court correctly imposed consecutive commitment terms under these circumstances.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**HOMEBANC CORP.**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with HomeBanc Corp.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Kevin D. Race, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Date: November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ KEVIN D. RACE                                                             |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Kevin D. Race*President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer* |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20706

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MARIA MAZARIEGOS-CAMPOS, also known as Jose Mazariegos, also 

known as Jose Maria Mazariegos, also known as Jose M. Mazariegos,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-355-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Maria 

Mazariegos-Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mazariegos-Campos has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20706 Document: 00512825401 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
No. 13-20706

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, the motion for new appointed counsel is DENIED, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-20706 Document: 00512825401 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
#### Yvonne Brummell, Respondent-Appellant, v Hendrick Brummell, Appellant-Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 611]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the *545Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated January 6, 2000, which, *inter alia,*awarded him only 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same judgment as awarded the defendant 40% of the value of her nursing license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license to the defendant *(see, Bugliari v Bugliari,*169 AD2d 697; *Maloney v Maloney,*137 AD2d 666).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a) and (b) of  Section 1350,
 Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned  officers of Brasil
Telecom  Participações S.A. (the "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
 Annual  Report  on Form  20-F for the  fiscal  year  ended  December 31,  2003 of the
 Company  fully  complies  with the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the
 Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information  contained in the Form 20-F  fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the company.

|Dated: June 23, 2004 | /s/ Humberto José Rocha Braz
Name: Humberto José Rocha Braz
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: June 23, 2004 | /s/ Paulo Pedrão Rio Branco
Name: Paulo Pedrão Rio Branco
Title: Financial Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Deali RICHBOURG

No. COA17-1007

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Valley Financial Corporation,
certify that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  |                        
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Kimberly B. Snyder 
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



101
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kasey Anderson Benson, Appellant

No. 06-23-00227-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2229396). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Kasey Anderson Benson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 3, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Raymond A. DA SILVA, Executor of the Estate of Dolores J. Pierce, Plaintiff, v. WAKEMED, WakeMed d/b/a WakeMed Cary Hospital, and WakeMed Faculty Practice Plan, Defendants.

No. COA17-820-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 21, 2018

REVERSED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               NAME UNDER
                                  JURISDICTION OF            WHICH BUSINESS
   SUBSIDIARY                      ESTABLISHMENT                 IS DONE
   ----------                     ---------------            --------------
<S>                               <C>                        <C>
Telpe Celular S.A.                    Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
Teleceara Celular S.A.                Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
Teleasa Celular S.A.                  Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
Telpa Celular S.A.                    Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
Telern Celular S.A.                   Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
Telepisa Celular S.A.                 Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
timnet.com S.A.                       Brazil                  TIM Nordeste
</TABLE>

                                       1
#### STATE ex rel. Mark NICKENS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Nickens, Mark;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 98-2381; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-657.

Denied.
**Exhibit      32. **
**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of **

**Atlantic      Coast Federal Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act      of      2002**

|   | 1. | the                report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Date: August 11, 2006                                              |   |   |                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |   |   |                                                                            |
|                                                               |   |   |                                                                            |
| /s/ Robert              J.              Larison, Jr.          |   |   | /s/ Jon              C.              Parker, Sr.                           |
| Robert              J. Larison, Jr.                                |   |   | Jon              C. Parker , Sr.                                                |
| President                andChief                Executive Officer |   |   | Senior                Vice- President andChief                Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date: March 14, 2005



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                    
|Martin E. Stein, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Merisant Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”),the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   |   | /s/ Diana S. Ferguson   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Diana S. Ferguson       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | November 13, 2007       |

 

 

 

35

----
Eugene K. EHMANN, N. William Shiffli, Jr., and Thad A. Throneburg v. MEDFLOW, INC.; Greg E. Lindberg; Eli Global, LLC ; Eli Research, LLC ; Eli Equity, LLC; SNA Capital, LLC ; Southland National Holdings, LLC ; Southland National Insurance Corporation; DJRTC, LLC ; and Medflow Holdings, LLC

No. 433A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Mr. Matthew N. Leerberg, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Medflow, Inc., et al.

Mr. Harold C. Spears, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Ehmann, Eugene K., et al.

Mr. Christopher P. Raab, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Ehmann, Eugene K., et al.

Mr. C. Bailey King, Jr., Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Medflow, Inc., et al.

***ORDER***

*207Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 31st of January 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Business Court, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Business Court:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."

Jackson, J. recused
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00043

- CV

CAROLYN D. KILLION APPELLANT

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE

ASSOCIATION A/K/A FA NNIE MAE APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COU NTY

-------- ----



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On April 4, 2013 , we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible

for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’ s record as required by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record an d

provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Se e Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 23 , 2013