alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        32**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Novint Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2007 (the
        “Report”), I, Tom Anderson, Chief Executive Officer, President and Acting Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to my
        knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                  November 15, 2007Albuquerque,
                  New Mexico
              
              /s/
                  TOM ANDERSONTom
                  AndersonChief
                  Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial
                  Officer
   A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        and will be retained by Novint Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Abel TRAVIESO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-4326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

Reversed and remanded.

Abel Travieso, Talledega, AL, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order striking his motion for post conviction relief and motion for rehearing filed in connection with pleas he entered in 1987 and 1996 cases. Noting their exact similarity to some twenty-four motions filed by seven other defendants incarcerated at the same federal correctional institution, the trial court determined both motions were fraudulent and struck them. We' find no authority under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure authorizing a court to strike a motion for post conviction relief as a sham pleading. We reverse for the reasons discussed in *Mullins v. State,*850 So.2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). On remand, the trial court shall rule on the motions.

FARMER, C.J., WARNER, and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
       ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of DuraVest, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company of Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that: (1) the 10-KSB Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-KSB Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                        DURAVEST, INC.

Dated:  March 31, 2005                  By: /s/ Patti Cooke
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Patti Cooke, President and Principal
                                            Executive, Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-79225 and 333-51034) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 1998 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-51032) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (FormS-8 Nos. 333-115763 and 333-131800) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2003 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-117889) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan, and (Form S-8 No. 333-124955)pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Award Plan of our reports dated August 25, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Corinthian Colleges, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

OrangeCounty, California 

August 25, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, W. Todd Steele, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WPT Enterprises, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    WPT Enterprises, Inc.s other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for WPT
Enterprises, Inc., and have:  a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to WPT Enterprises, Inc.,
including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of WPT Enterprises, Inc.s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in WPT Enterprises, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during WPT
Enterprises, Inc.s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, WPT Enterprises,
Inc.s internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    WPT Enterprises, Inc.s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to WPT Enterprises, Inc.s auditors and the audit committee of
WPT Enterprises, Inc.s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect WPT Enterprises, Inc.s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in WPT Enterprises, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ W. Todd Steele
W. Todd Steele
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63
 of Title 18 of the United
States Code
 
 
 I, Daniel
P. Hansen, the Chief Financial Officer of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC
(“Summit”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of
Summit for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Summit.




/s/ Daniel
      P. HansenDaniel
      P. HansenChief
      Financial OfficerSummit
      Hotel Properties, LLCAugust
      16, 2010
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Curt Hecker
    
    
    
    /s/ Doug WrightCurt Hecker
    
    
    
    Doug WrightChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 31, 2006
**EXHIBIT
      21**




**theglobe.com,
      inc. Subsidiaries**




tglo.com,
      inc. (formerly known as voiceglo Holdings, Inc.), a Delaware Corporation





Direct
      Partner Telecom, Inc., a Florida Corporation





Strategy
      Plus, Inc., a Vermont Corporation





Chips
      & Bits, Inc., a Vermont Corporation





EDP
      Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as SendTec, Inc.), a Florida Corporation





VOIP
      Staffing, Inc., a Delaware Corporation





Tralliance
      Corporation, a New York Corporation





tglo
      Promotions Corporation (formerly known as US VOIP Corp.), a Delaware Corporation





Tralliance
      Partners International Corp., a Delaware Corporation
#### W.B.S., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D00-4715.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 2003.

*803James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

W.B.S. appeals from an order adjudicating him guilty of felony battery and revoking his community control. We agree with W.B.S.’s argument that the trial court’s granting of his motion for a judgment of dismissal barred later reconsideration of the felony battery charge. We reverse the adjudication of guilt as to that charge; however, we affirm the revocation of W.B.S.’s community control.

The State filed a petition alleging that W.B.S. had committed a delinquent act, felony battery, a third-degree felony, contrary to section 784.041, Florida Statutes (2000). Following the testimony at W.B.S.’s bench trial, the trial court granted defense counsel’s motion for a judgment of dismissal, finding that the State had failed to establish a prima facie case of felony battery. The case was bifurcated as to W.B.S.’s violation of community control.

Several weeks later, when the case was reconvened, W.B.S. was represented by a different lawyer. For reasons which are not apparent from the record, the trial court again heard argument relating to the *804felony battery charge. The court then found W.B.S. guilty of felony battery, adjudicated W.B.S. a delinquent child, and found him in wilful and substantial violation of his community control. The defense did not object to the court’s ruling on grounds that the charge had previously been dismissed.

In a nonjury trial, jeopardy attaches when the court begins to hear evidence. *R.A.C. v. State,*736 So.2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Here, after the court heard all the evidence, it dismissed the felony battery charge without reserving any issue for later consideration. Jeopardy had already attached when the court dismissed the charge, and therefore, retraction of the dismissal violated W.B.S.’s double jeopardy rights. *See Caldwell v. State,*803 So.2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

However, as the State argues, W.B.S. could still be found in violation of community control based on the facts establishing the felony battery. *See Louis v. State,*797 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). A violation of community control needs to be proven only by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. *Smith v. State,*788 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Here, the State showed by a preponderance of the evidence that W.B.S. and two other boys attacked, beat, and kicked another boy. This evidence supported the finding that W.B.S. violated his community control due to a new law violation. Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication of guilt for felony battery and affirm the order finding W.B.S. in violation of community control.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

SALCINES and COVINGTON, JJ„ Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA-24-0506

THE PATCH, LLC d/b/a Purple Cow Dispensary, 

Petitioner/Appellant

v.

THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , CANNABIS CONTROL 

DIVISION

Respondent/Appelee

On Appeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County

The Honorable Judge Thomas Pardy Presiding

District Court Cause No. DV-2023-735, 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon review of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time and 

good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time is granted. Appellant’s Opening Brief is due on or before 

October 28, 2024.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 25 2024

09/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0506
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A)/15d-14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, William Dunavant, Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Global
Imaging 3D Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this annual report my
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ William DunavantBy: William Dunavant, Chief
Executive Officer

April 17, 2008

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Class III Gaming Compacts taking effect.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is given that the Tribal-State compact between the Thlopthlocco Tribal Town and the State of Oklahoma, and the Tribal-State compact between the Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma and the State of Oklahoma are considered to have been approved and are in effect.

# DATES:

Effective October 3, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under Section 11(d)(7)(D) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior must publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of any Tribal-State compact that is approved, or considered to have been approved for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority did not approve or disapprove these compacts before the date that is 45 days after the date these compacts were submitted. These compacts authorize these Indian tribes to engage in certain Class III gaming activities, provides for certain geographical exclusivity, limits the number of gaming machines at existing racetracks, and prohibits non-tribal operation of certain machines and covered games. Therefore, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(C), these compacts are considered to have been approved, but only to the extent they are consistent with IGRA.                

Dated: September 20, 2005.

Michael D. Olsen,

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 05-19733 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
Christopher J. ANGLIN v. Philip E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina State Senate; Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the House of the North Carolina House of Representatives; the State of North Carolina; the North Carolina Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement; and Kimberly W. Strach, in her official capacity as Executive Director of North Carolina Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement

No. 272P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2018

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Matthew A. Abee, Attorney at Law, for Berger, Philip E., et al

John D. Burns, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Michael David Bland, Attorney at Law, Matthews, Bo Caudill, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Anglin, Christopher J.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Amar Majmundar, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 24th of August 2018 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2018."

Jackson, J. recused
Kevin PEGUES, Plaintiff, v. Latonya R. MONROE, Defendant.

No. COA18-162

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.