alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.06

SCHEDULE OF OMITTED AUTHORIZATIONS FOR PERSONAL MOBILE SERVICES

As these agreements are identical in every case except for their reference number
and the sector of Region II covered by them, we have, for ease of reference, filed only the relevant standard authorization for personal mobile services approved by ANATEL and provided this schedule to indicate the authorizations that we have
omitted from filing as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F.



|1. | Statement of Authorization for Personal Mobile Services between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 027/2002, dated December 18, 2002.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Statement of Authorization for Personal Mobile Services between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 028/2002, dated December 18, 2002.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Earnest L. MACK v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2107.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 29, 2003.

In re Mack, Earnest L.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2082-93; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 02-00132.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 15, 2004
### uc_a l fek5

Douglas ' J. , J. the first case." 

### Weddell v. Sharp, 131 Nev., Adv. Op. 28, 350 P.3d 80, 85 (2015). The record reveals that the parties to this suit were parties to Sandoval's prior suit. Sandoval concedes that there was a final judgment in the prior suit, as the district court granted summary judgment. Sandoval also concedes that this suit arises out of the same September 15, 2011, incident as his prior suit. Sandoval could have raised these tort claims in the first suit. 

### See Alcantara v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 28, 321 P.3d 912, 915 (2014) ("[A]ll claims based on the same facts and alleged wrongful conduct that were or could have been brought in the first proceeding are subject to claim preclusion." (internal quotation marks omitted)). Sandoval argues that there was no final judgment on his state law claims; however, claim preclusion does not require that each claim is "actually and necessarily litigated," only that they arose from the same facts and could have been brought initially. 

### Five Star Capital Corp., 124 Nev. at 1054-55, 194 P.3d at 713. Thus, we conclude that claim preclusion properly applies to Sandoval's claims and that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Victor Sandoval Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF 2
NEVADA

(0)1947A citiefo,
## **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOFBLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC.UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBlue Ridge Paper Products Inc. (the “Company”) certify pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| ** **               | ** ** | **/S/ RICHARD A. LOZYNIAK** | ** ** | ** ** |
|                     | Richard A. Lozyniak |   |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| ** **               | ** ** | **/S/ JOHN B. WADSWORTH** | ** ** | ** ** |
|                     | John B. Wadsworth |   |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                          |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mondial  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  June 21, 2006


/s/ Scott Taylor
-------------------------------------------
Scott Taylor, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Cesar Villavicencio, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Madison Avenue
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2004


/s/ Cesar  Villavicencio
------------------------------------
Cesar  Villavicencio
CEO and Principal Accounting Officer
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Wildon Productions  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  July 31, 2006


/s/ Ekaterina Popoff
-----------------------------------------------
Ekaterina Popoff, Principal Financial Officer
Order entered December 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01021-CV

TIC N. CENTRAL, DALLAS 3, LLC ET AL, Appellants

V.

ENVIROBUSINESS, INC ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02857-E

ORDER

The Court GRANTS Perkins & Will, Inc., Tom Reisenbichler, and David Collins’s 

December 9, 2013 agreed motion for extension of time to file reply brief and ORDER their brief 

be filed no later than December 13, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SPHERE OF LANGUAGE (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Bicknell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: July 14, 2005

/s/ Bruce Bicknell

Bruce Bicknell

Chief Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4627 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize coverage of 

post-mastectomy water-resistant coverings if they are determined to be 

consistent with clinical protocol or medically necessary to reduce the 

risk of infection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2014 

Mr. POSEY (for himself and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

coverage of post-mastectomy water-resistant coverings if 

they are determined to be consistent with clinical protocol 

or medically necessary to reduce the risk of infection, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-Mastectomy In5 fection Risk Reduction Act of 2014’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4627 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF POST-MASTECTOMY 

2 WATER-RESISTANT COVERINGS IF THEY ARE 

3 DETERMINED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH MED4 ICAL PROTOCOL OR MEDICALLY NECESSARY 

5 TO REDUCE THE RISK OF INFECTION. 

6 Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1395x(n)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘Such term includes a post-mastectomy water-resistant 

9 covering insofar as the Secretary determines that such a 

10 covering is consistent with clinical protocol or is medically 

11 necessary to reduce the risk of infection after a mastec12 tomy.’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Elizar SAMSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D01-2675.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 2003.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, Laurel R. Wiley and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the pleas and sentences in this case. Elizar Samson (“Samson”) argues that his nolo contendere pleas were improperly accepted because he was incompetent at the time. We agree and reverse.

Samson was charged with eight counts of robbery with a deadly weapon. He was then adjudicated incompetent to proceed and institutionalized for treatment. At a later hearing, he pled nolo contendere to the counts charged and was sentenced to thirty-one year concurrent sentences of imprisonment on all counts. Prior to entering these pleas, no hearing was held adjudicating Samson’s legal status from incompetent to competent.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(a) provides:

> A person accused of an offense or a violation of probation or community control who is mentally incompetent to proceed at any material stage of a criminal proceeding shall not be proceeded against while incompetent.

An individual adjudicated incompetent is presumed to remain incompetent until adjudicated restored to competence. *Alexander v. State,*380 So.2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (citing *Corbin v. State,*129 Fla. 421, 176 So. 435 (1937)). Furthermore, “the legal status of a defendant cannot be adjudicated from incompetent to competent without a hearing.” *Id.*at 1190.

*1117Contrary to the State’s contention, the required hearing to determine whether Samson had been restored to competence did not occur. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212 sets forth the required competency hearing procedures for determining whether a defendant previously adjudicated incompetent has been restored to competence. *See Mora v. State,*814 So.2d 322, 333 (Fla.2002)(indicating that where a defendant’s competence is once questioned, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.210, 3.211, and 3.212 apply if his competence is again questioned). These procedures include the calling of court-appointed expert witnesses designated under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.211, a determination of competence to proceed, and the entry of an order finding competence. *See*Fla. R. Crirn. P. 3.212.

In the present case, the trial judge did not take the testimony of any of the examining physicians and did not enter a written order stating that Samson was restored to competence. Therefore, he remained incompetent to proceed and could not enter valid pleas. *See Godinez v. Moran,*509 U.S. 389, 396, 113 S.Ct. 2680, 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993); *Catinella v. State,*732 So.2d 444, 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Duane Jay BALL and Irene Ball, Plaintiffs v. Crystal COGDILL and Jackson's General Store, Inc., Defendants

No. COA17-409

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
#### Henry L. GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 19, 2003.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See State v. Causey,*503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987).

SHARP, W„ THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. $11,000.00 U.S. CURRENCY and (5) Firearms Marcus B. and Cynthia Gordon.

No. 2003-CP-0893.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

CYNTHIA GORDON; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s order dated May 16, 2003; Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st. Judicial District Court, Div. O, No. 266-98; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 02-1118.

Not considered. See Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason J. MILLHOUSE, Defendant.

No. COA17-1142

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 6, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART.
Sherry WOLFE, Plaintiff, v. John POINDEXTER, Defendant.

No. COA17-1366

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

REVERSED.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.s 333-32854 and 333-41394) pertaining to the eGain Communications Corporation Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan, the Social Science, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Big
Science Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the eGain Communications Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated Inference Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 Non-Management Stock Option
Plan, the Inference Corporation 1998 New Hire Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Charles W. Jepson Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Private Placement Stock Option Plan, the Inference Corporation Fourth Amended and Restated
Incentive Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and (Form S-3 No. 333-48314) pertaining to 22,373,370 Shares of Common Stock and the related Prospectus of our report dated August 7, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of eGain Communications Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.





/s/     Ernst & Young LLP





Palo Alto, CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2002
Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Achievers  Magazine  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.

Date: June 14, 2007


/s/ Arto Tavukciyan
------------------------------------
Arto Tavukciyan
Principal Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the WELFARE OF T.J.C., Child.

No. C3-02-1622.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Aug. 5, 2003.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED (1) that the petition of T.J.C. for further review of the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted; (2) that the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, reversed for reconsideration of the harmless error analysis; and (3) that the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with the harmless error standard articulated in *State v. Juarez,*572 N.W.2d 286 (Minn.1997): whether the adjudication of delinquency was surely unattributable to the error.

BY THE COURT

/s/Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry W. Buckley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ HARRY W. BUCKLEY                 
|HARRY W. BUCKLEY                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|December 9, 2009