alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-352-CR

NO. 2-07-354-CR

BRYAN RAY ROE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Bryan Ray Roe appeals from two convictions for indecency with

a child–exposure. The trial court convicted him in each case and sentenced him

to confinement of ten years’ in each case, with the sentences to run

consecutively. In each case, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has

filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In

the briefs, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, these appeals are
2... 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3... See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991);

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no

pet.).

4... See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351

(1988). 

5... See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005).

2

frivolous. Counsel’s briefs and motions meet the requirements of Anders v.

California2by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating

why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Although Appellant was given an

opportunity to file a pro se brief, he has not done so.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw

on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of

Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the

record.3 Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

4

We have carefully reviewed counsel’s briefs and the records. We agree

with counsel that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find

nothing in the records that arguably might support the appeals.5 Accordingly,

we grant counsel’s motions to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
3

DELIVERED: February 26, 2009
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 2, 2017

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General.

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

*641The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of July 2017 by Amicus Honorable James B. Hunt, Jr. and Honorable Burley B. Mitchell:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of August 2017."

Amicus shall have up to and including the 10th day of August 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain Communications
Corporation (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    ASHUTOSH
ROYAshutosh Roy  September 29, 2003




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---

|1 |  | The material contained in this Exhibit 99.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Robert WEINGARTNER v. LOUISIANA ICE GATORS.

No. 2003-C-1388.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

*646In re Louisiana Ice Gators; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation District #4, No. 01-06629; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. WCA 02-1181.

Denied.

TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ.
#### Stephanie Medugno et al., Respondents, v City of Glen Cove, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[718 NYS2d 881]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant City of Glen Cove appeals from so much of (1) an order of *511the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated October 22, 1999, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendants City of Glen Cove and the Glen Cove Community Development Agency which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 10, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 22, 1999, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated February 10, 2000, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated February 10, 2000, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Stephanie Medugno seeks to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell on ice caused by a leak in a garage owned by the appellant. The appellant moved for summary judgment on the ground that it did not have prior written notice of the allegedly dangerous or defective condition as required by City Charter of the City of Glen Cove § 4-5. Further, the appellant contended that, if it had such notice, the alleged defective condition was repaired prior to Mrs. Medugno’s fall and the appellant received no additional written notice of a defective condition after the repairs were completed.

In opposition, the plaintiffs came forward with evidence demonstrating that the appellant had prior written notice. Further, contrary to the appellant’s contention, there are triable issues of fact as to whether the repairs were completed or the defective condition remedied prior to Mrs. Medugno’s fall. In concluding that there are issues of fact, we have not considered the computer generated printout of an alleged letter dated March 5, 1996, purportedly sent to the appellant by its contractor. The appellant correctly contends that the plaintiff did not substantiate that the alleged letter was ever sent.

To the extent the plaintiffs contend that an exception to the written notice requirement applies in this case because the appellant created the defective condition *(see, Amabile v City of Buffalo,*93 NY2d 471, 474), that issue is unpreserved for appellate review since it was not raised in the Supreme Court *(see, Gross v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*240 AD2d 468).

We have not considered the appellant’s argument regarding the adequacy of the injured plaintiff’s notice of claim which *512was improperly raised for the first time before the Supreme Court in its reply papers *(see, Cumpston v Marcinkowska,*275 AD2d 340). Altman, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Billy Ray ARTIS

316P98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Billy Ray Artis, for Artis, Billy Ray.

Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of September 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Rehearing:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of October 2018."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jon C. Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Jon C. Parker
-----------------------------
Jon C. Parker
Chief Financial Officer

                                  []PAGE []37[]
In the MATTER OF: L.A.G.

No. COA18-283

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 7, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 13, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0452. RONALD CONNER v. THEODORA BECK et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15A0308410
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4528 

To require a report and briefing to Congress explaining the procurement 

and inspection process for armored vehicles to transport civilian employees of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. LIPINSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require a report and briefing to Congress explaining 

the procurement and inspection process for armored vehicles to transport civilian employees of the Department 

of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4528 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPORT AND BRIEFING TO CONGRESS EX2 PLAINING THE PROCUREMENT AND INSPEC3 TION PROCESS FOR ARMORED VEHICLES TO 

4 TRANSPORT CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE 

5 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

6 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con7 gress that— 

8 (1) civilian employees of the Department of De9 fense should be provided all reasonable protection 

10 while in hostile foreign areas, and that protection 

11 should include adequate armored vehicle transpor12 tation; and 

13 (2) to ensure adequate protection, the Depart14 ment of Defense should employ stringent, uniform 

15 standards while procuring armored vehicles for civil16 ians to be used overseas as well as stringent stand17 ards for inspection upon delivery. 

18 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, 

20 in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for 

21 Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to the 

22 congressional defense committees a report on the Depart23 ment’s policies for procuring and inspecting armored vehi24 cles for transporting civilian employees. Such report 

25 should include the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4528 IH

1 (1) An explanation of what the Department’s 

2 current policies are for procuring and inspecting ar3 mored vehicles for transporting civilians through 

4 hostile or potentially hostile territory. 

5 (2) A comparison of the policies outlined in 

6 paragraph (1) with other departments, and specifi7 cally the Department of State. 

8 (3) An evaluation by the Secretary to determine 

9 whether changes to the policies outlined in para10 graph (1) would be beneficial in enhancing safety for 

11 the civilians described in paragraph (1). 

12 (4) Any other matters the Secretary determines 

13 appropriate. 

14 (c) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, 

16 in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense of 

17 Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall provide to 

18 the congressional defense committees a detailed briefing 

19 on the report required in subsection (b). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry W. Buckley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ HARRY W. BUCKLEY                 
|Harry W. Buckley                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|September 8, 2010
HAYMOND v. HOOKS, et al.

200P10-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 20, 2018

Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Gene W. Haymond, for Haymond, Gene Wayne.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of October 2018 by Petitioner for Appointment of Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of November 2018."
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

d0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140436 & (27)(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140436 COA: 293161 Wayne CC: 98-009513 LEROY LYONS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Novemb er 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for appointment of
counsel is DENIED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4521 

To modify exemptions for small creditors and mortgage loan servicers, to 

require a study of appropriate capital requirements for mortgage servicing assets for nonsystemic banking institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To modify exemptions for small creditors and mortgage loan 

servicers, to require a study of appropriate capital requirements for mortgage servicing assets for nonsystemic 

banking institutions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Institution 

5 Mortgage Relief Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4521 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM ESCROW REQUIREMENTS FOR 

2 LOANS HELD BY SMALL CREDITORS. 

3 Section 129D(c) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 1639d(c)), as added by section 1461(a) of the 

5 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protec6 tion Act, is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), (3), 

8 and (4) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) 

9 and moving such subparagraphs 2 ems to the right; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘The Board’’ and inserting the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Board’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF LOANS HELD BY SMALLER

16 CREDITORS.—The Board shall, by regulation, exempt 

17 from the requirements of subsection (a) any loan secured 

18 by a first lien on a consumer’s principle dwelling, if such 

19 loan is held by a creditor with assets of $10,000,000,000 

20 or less.’’. 

21 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO EXEMPTION FOR SMALL 

22 SERVICERS OF MORTGAGE LOANS. 

23 Section 6 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures 

24 Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2605) is amended by adding at 

25 the end the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4521 IH

1 ‘‘(n) SMALL SERVICER EXEMPTION.—The Bureau 

2 shall, by regulation, provide exemptions to, or adjustments 

3 for, the provisions of this section for servicers that annu4 ally service 20,000 or fewer mortgage loans, in order to 

5 reduce regulatory burdens while appropriately balancing 

6 consumer protections.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 58785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 159: Global Positioning System (GPS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 159 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 159: Global Positioning System.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 24-28, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
(unless stated otherwise).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 159 meeting. Note: Specific 
working group sessions will be held October 24-27. The plenary agenda 
will include:

<bullet> October 28:
<bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, 
Approve Minutes of Previous Meeting)
<bullet> Review Working Group Progress and Identify Issues for 
Resolution
    <bullet> Global Positioning System (GPS)/3rd Civil Frequency (WG-1)
    <bullet> GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) (WG-2)
    <bullet> GPS/GLONASS (WG-2A)
    <bullet> GPS/inertial (WG-2C)
    <bullet> GPS/Precision Landing Guidance (WG-4)
    <bullet> GPS/Airport Surface Surveillance (WG-5)
    <bullet> GPS/Interference (WG-6)
    <bullet> GPS/Antennas (WG-7)
    <bullet> GPS/GRAS (WG-8)
<bullet> Review of EUROCAE activities
<bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Assignment/Review of Future Work, 
Other Business, Date and Place of Next Meeting

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 28, 2005.
Natalie Ogletree,
FAA General Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 05-20280 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mondial  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies   with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial  condition and  results  of  operations  of  the
        Company.


Date:  June 21, 2006


/s/ Scott Taylor
-------------------------------------------
Scott Taylor, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission (the  "Report"),  I, Robert D. Heuchan,  Chief  Executive  Officer of
Third Century,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          Third Century Bancorp.




/s/ Robert D. Heuchan
-----------------------------
Robert D. Heuchan
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 16, 2005


The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.