alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1539

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Toby Edward Carter, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 26, 2004 Filed: July 28, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Toby Edward Carter appeals the sentence the district court * imposed after revoking Carter’s supervised release. The district court sentenced Carter to 7 months in prison, followed by a 28-day residential substance-abuse-treatment program, and then 24 months additional supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Carter argues the district court was not authorized to impose the additional supervised release because 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) was enacted after he committed the offenses underlying his original conviction. We conclude the district court did not commit-2- plain error in ordering supervised release because while section 3583(h) does not apply retroactively to Carter's case, at the time of his offense 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) authorized the court to impose the challenged sentence. See Johnson v. United States , 529 U.S. 694, 702, 713 (2000). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
STATE of North Carolina v. Damien Markese PRUITT

No. COA17-883

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
Exhibit 4.1


 





  


ORDINARY SHARES
OF NIS 1.00 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF KAMADA LTD. transferable on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by
duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile signatures of the Company’s duly authorized
officers. DATED:


 




    	 



    	 



    

 





The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations:




 


	 	TEN COM	 – as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–	Custodian
	 	TEN ENT	– as tenants by the entireties	 	 	(Cust)	(Minor)
	 	JT TEN	
        – as joint tenants with the right of 

   survivorship
and not as tenants in common
	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

Act ____________________________
	 	 	 	 	 	(State)


 


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


 


TRANSFER FORM


 


Complete this form only when transferring
to another person.


 


For value received, ______________________________________________
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 
	 

                                                                                 
	 


 


	 
	PLEASE TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 


 


	 	Shares


 


represented by the within certificate and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint __________________________________________________________________________________________ attorney to transfer
the said same on the books of the within-named Company, with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


	Dated	 	 


 


	 	X 	 
	 	 	SIGNATURE(S)
	 	 	 
	 	NOTICE: 	The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.


 


Signature(s) Guaranteed:


 


	 	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Perez, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 877]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), rendered July 13, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he received the effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Sinclair,*266 AD2d 482). “Mere losing tactics are not to be confused with ineffectiveness, and to sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, proof of less than meaningful representation is required, rather than disagreement with counsel’s strategies and tactics” *(People v Sinclair,*supra, at 482).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of James William KEPHART.

No. 830 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 27, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on April 3, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James William Kephart to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James William Kephart is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Maurice WILSON

No. COA17-917

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58504-58505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34753]


Central Illinois Railroad Company--Operation Exemption--Rail Line 
of the City of Peoria, IL

    Central Illinois Railroad Company (CIRY), a Class III rail carrier, 
has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41, et seq., 
to operate a line of railroad owned by the City of Peoria, IL (the 
City), extending easterly approximately 1.9 miles from a point of 
connection with the Peoria Subdivision of the Union Pacific Railroad 
Company (UP) at approximately UP milepost 71.5 to a point a short 
distance west of

[[Page 58505]]

University Avenue in Peoria, Peoria County, IL.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The subject line is proposed to be connected to an 8.29-mile 
rail line known as the Kellar Branch, which is owned by the City. 
The City was granted an exemption to construct approximately 1,800 
feet of connecting track in Peoria in 2004. See City of Peoria, IL, 
D/B/A Peoria, Peoria Heights & Western Railroad--Construction of 
Connecting Track Exemption--In Peoria County, IL, STB Finance Docket 
No. 34395 (STB served Sept. 17, 2004). Also, CIRY received authority 
to operate the Kellar Branch in 2004. See Central Illinois Railroad 
Company--Operation Exemption--Rail Line of the City of Peoria and 
the Village of Peoria Heights in Peoria and Peoria Heights, Peoria 
County, IL, STB Finance Docket No. 34518 (STB served July 28, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Certification is made that CIRY's projected revenues as a result of 
the transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class 
I rail carrier. The transaction was scheduled to be consummated no 
earlier than September 14, 2005 (7 days after the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34753, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, 208 South 
LaSalle Street, Suite 1890, Chicago, IL 60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.

    Decided: September 29, 2005.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-20020 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth S. Ord     
|Kenneth S. Ord         
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 26, 2008
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.3



                           [WFS FINANCIAL LETTERHEAD]



January 14, 1999


Chase Manhattan Bank of Delaware              Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
1201 Market Street                            99 Church Street
Wilmington, Delaware  19801                   New York, NY  10007

Bankers Trust Company                         Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
4 Albany Street                               A division of McGraw-Hill, Inc.
New York, New York 10006                      25 Broadway
                                              New York, NY  10004
Financial Security Assurance Inc.
350 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022


Re:      Annual Statement as to Compliance for
         WFS Financial 1998-C Owner Trust


Dear Sir or Madam:



                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE



Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") dated
as of November 1, 1998, and to Section 3.09 of the Indenture ("Indenture"),
dated as of the same date, the undersigned officers of WFS Financial Inc (the
"Master Servicer") certify that:

         (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer since the closing
date and of its performance under the Agreement and the Indenture has been made
under such officers' supervision, and

         (ii) to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement and the
Indenture throughout such year and that no default under the Agreement or the
Indenture has occurred.


/s/ Lee A. Whatcott                          /s/ Mark Olson
----------------------------                 ----------------------------------
Lee A. Whatcott                              Mark Olson
Executive Vice President & CFO               Senior Vice President & Controller

cc:   A. Katz, Esq.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 ofthe United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of WPT Enterprises, Inc.,that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of WPT Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 29, 2009, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of WPT Enterprises, Inc.This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of thisstatement has been provided to WPT Enterprises, Inc. and will be retainedby WPT Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date: May 6, 2009 | /s/ *Steven Lipscomb*                 |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                   | Steven Lipscomb                       |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 
| Date: May 6, 2009 | /s/ *Thomas Flahie*             |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                   | Thomas Flahie                   |
|                   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Robert J. Larison, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofcircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respect the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005   /s/ Robert J. Larison, Jr.   Robert J. Larison, Jr.  President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monadnock Community Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Karl F. Betz, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the company's financial condition and results
            of operations.


Date: August 11, 2005                  /s/ Karl F. Betz
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Karl F. Betz
                                           Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer


<PAGE>  25
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Ray ALLEN

No. 113P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2018

Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Allen, Billy Ray.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tenisha S. Jacobs, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of April 2018 by Defendant in this *203matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."
Exhibit 31.2

I, Frank S. Yuan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Cyber Merchants Exchange, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the  registrant  and have: a)
designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which  this  report is being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such  evaluation;  and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to affect,  the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons   performing  the  equivalent   functions):   a)  all   significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the design or  operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report  financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other  employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: September 23, 2004

/s/ Frank S. Yuan
------------------------
Frank S. Yuan
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Douglas ROBINSON

No. 422P07-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2018

Mr. Keith Douglas Robinson, For Robinson, Keith Douglas.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of NC.

Mr. Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for the State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Durham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of July 2018."