# Official Journal C 145/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.145.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 145 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5414 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.145.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 145

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5414 May 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 145/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 139, 7.5.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 145/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 139, 7.5.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 145/02 | Case C-385/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Accession of new Member States — Marketing authorisations for medicinal products that are generics of the reference product Plavix — Conditional decisions authorising the marketing of pharmaceutical products — Infringement of the acquis) | 2 |
| 2011/C 145/03 | Case C-27/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia — grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 January 2011 — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost | 3 |
| 2011/C 145/04 | Case C-32/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2011 — Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt., Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt., Gépjármű Márkakereskedők Országos Szövetsége, Magyar Peugeot Márkakereskedők Biztosítási Alkusz Kft. And Paragon-Alkusz Zrt., legal successor of Magyar Opelkereskedők Bróker Kft. v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal | 4 |
| 2011/C 145/05 | Case C-40/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 28 January 2011 — Yoshikazu Iida v City of Ulm | 4 |
| 2011/C 145/06 | Case C-44/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 January 2011 — Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main V-Höchst v Deutsche Bank AG | 6 |
| 2011/C 145/07 | Case C-49/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 3 February 2011 — Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer | 6 |
| 2011/C 145/08 | Case C-56/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 February 2011 — Raiffeisen-Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main e.G. v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH | 7 |
| 2011/C 145/09 | Case C-62/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 10 February 2011 — Florence Feyerbacher v Land Hessen, represented by the Regierungspräsidium Gießen | 7 |
| 2011/C 145/10 | Case C-68/11: Action brought on 16 February 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic | 8 |
| 2011/C 145/11 | Case C-69/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium), lodged on 16 February 2011 — Connoisseur Belgium BVBA v Belgische Staat | 8 |
| 2011/C 145/12 | Case C-83/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) London (United Kingdom) made on 22 February 2011 — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman, Fazly Rabby Islam, Mohibullah Rahman | 9 |
| 2011/C 145/13 | Case C-84/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 24 February 2011 — Marja-Liisa Susisalo, Olli Tuomaala, Merja Ritala | 9 |
| 2011/C 145/14 | Case C-85/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v Ireland | 10 |
| 2011/C 145/15 | Case C-86/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 11 |
| 2011/C 145/16 | Case C-98/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2011 by Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG against the judgment of the General Court (FirstChamber) delivered on 17 December 2010 in Case T-336/08 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 11 |
| 2011/C 145/17 | Case C-100/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by Helena Rubinstein, L'Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-345/08: Helena Rubinstein SNC, L'Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Allergan, Inc. | 12 |
| 2011/C 145/18 | Case C-103/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-19/07 Systran and Systran Luxembourg v Commission | 13 |
| 2011/C 145/19 | Case C-108/11: Action brought on 2 March 2011 — European Commission v Ireland | 13 |
| 2011/C 145/20 | Case C-117/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 4 March 2011 — Purple Parking Ltd, Airparks Services Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs | 14 |
| 2011/C 145/21 | Case C-118/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Eon Asset Management OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ | 15 |
| 2011/C 145/22 | Case C-119/11: Action brought on 4 March 2011 — European Commission v French Republic | 16 |
| 2011/C 145/23 | Case C-120/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Yeboah Kwadwo | 17 |
| 2011/C 145/24 | Case C-123/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 March 2011 — A Oy | 17 |
| 2011/C 145/25 | Case C-129/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 March 2011 — OOD Provadiinvest v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ | 17 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 145/26 | Case T-375/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Viega v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Participation in the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Relevant turnover — Attenuating circumstances) | 19 |
| 2011/C 145/27 | Case T-376/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Legris Industries v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement) | 19 |
| 2011/C 145/28 | Case T-377/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Comap v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Determination of the starting amount of the fine — Proportionality) | 19 |
| 2011/C 145/29 | Case T-378/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IMI and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Relevant turnover — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Equal treatment) | 20 |
| 2011/C 145/30 | Case T-379/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Kaimer and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Rights of the defence — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Proportionality — Equal treatment) | 20 |
| 2011/C 145/31 | Case T-381/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — FRA.BO v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Attenuating circumstances — Immunity from fines — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment) | 21 |
| 2011/C 145/32 | Case T-382/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Tomkins v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Duration of the infringement) | 21 |
| 2011/C 145/33 | Case T-384/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IBP and International Building Products France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Aggravating circumstances) | 22 |
| 2011/C 145/34 | Case T-385/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Aalberts Industries and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Single and continuous infringement — Participation in the infringement) | 22 |
| 2011/C 145/35 | Case T-386/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Pegler v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — Deterrent effect) | 23 |
| 2011/C 145/36 | Case T-214/07: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Arable crops — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the smaller Aegean islands) | 23 |
| 2011/C 145/37 | Case T-117/08: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Italy v EESC (Rules on the use of languages — Vacancy notice concerning the recruitment of the Secretary-General of the EESC — Publication in three official languages — Information relating to the vacancy notice — Publication in all official languages — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 12 of the CEOS — Regulation No 1) | 23 |
| 2011/C 145/38 | Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid for Leipzig/Halle Airport — Funding of investments relating to the construction of the new southern runway — Decision declaring aid compatible with the common market — Actions for annulment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Airport infrastructure) | 24 |
| 2011/C 145/39 | Case T-33/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2011 — Portugal v Commission (Non-compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Penalty payment — Claim for payment — Repeal of the legislation at issue) | 24 |
| 2011/C 145/40 | Case T-54/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Natura Selection (Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil — Earlier Community figurative mark natura selection — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 25 |
| 2011/C 145/41 | Case T-149/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Dover v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Review of the use of allowances — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Justification of expenditure — Recovery of undue payments) | 25 |
| 2011/C 145/42 | Case T-184/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 and Article 11(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Assessment of the risk of financial loss to the EAGGF — Principle of proportionality) | 26 |
| 2011/C 145/43 | Case T-419/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 26 |
| 2011/C 145/44 | Case T-503/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 26 |
| 2011/C 145/45 | Case T-14/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — CheckMobile v OHIM (carcheck) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ‘carcheck’ — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 27 |
| 2011/C 145/46 | Joined Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL and Others) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility) | 27 |
| 2011/C 145/47 | Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility) | 28 |
| 2011/C 145/48 | Case T-100/11: Action brought on 17 February 2011 — MSE Pharmazeutika v OHIM — Merck Sharp & Dohme (SINAMIT) | 28 |
| 2011/C 145/49 | Case T-112/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission | 29 |
| 2011/C 145/50 | Case T-113/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission | 30 |
| 2011/C 145/51 | Case T-125/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission | 31 |
| 2011/C 145/52 | Case T-149/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council | 31 |
| 2011/C 145/53 | Case T-151/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Telefónica de España and Telefónica Móviles España v Commission | 32 |
| 2011/C 145/54 | Case T-159/11: Action brought on 10 March 2011 — Marszałkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO) | 33 |
| 2011/C 145/55 | Case T-166/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Häfele v OHIM (Infront) | 33 |
| 2011/C 145/56 | Case T-167/11: Action brought on 15 March 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission | 34 |
| 2011/C 145/57 | Case T-170/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Rivella International v OHIM — Baskaya di Baskaya & C. (BASKAYA) | 34 |
| 2011/C 145/58 | Case T-171/11: Action brought on 21 March 2011 — Hopf v OHIM (Clampflex) | 35 |
| 2011/C 145/59 | Case T-173/11: Action brought on 22 March 2011 — Hesse v OHIM — Porsche (Carrera) | 35 |
| 2011/C 145/60 | Case T-177/11: Action brought on 25 March 2011 — PASP and Others v Council | 36 |
| 2011/C 145/61 | Case T-178/11: Action brought on 18 March 2011 — Voss of Norway v OHIM — Nordic Spirit (Three-dimensional ‘bottle’) | 36 |
| 2011/C 145/62 | Case T-183/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Jacinto (My Little Bear) | 37 |
| 2011/C 145/63 | Case T-186/11: Action brought on 26 March 2011 — Schönberger v Parliament | 37 |
| 2011/C 145/64 | Case T-188/11: Action brought on 1 April 2011 — Chiboub v Council | 38 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 145/02

Case C-385/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Accession of new Member States — Marketing authorisations for medicinal products that are generics of the reference product Plavix — Conditional decisions authorising the marketing of pharmaceutical products — Infringement of the acquis)

2

2011/C 145/03

Case C-27/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia — grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 January 2011 — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost

3

2011/C 145/04

Case C-32/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2011 — Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt., Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt., Gépjármű Márkakereskedők Országos Szövetsége, Magyar Peugeot Márkakereskedők Biztosítási Alkusz Kft. And Paragon-Alkusz Zrt., legal successor of Magyar Opelkereskedők Bróker Kft. v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal

4

2011/C 145/05

Case C-40/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 28 January 2011 — Yoshikazu Iida v City of Ulm

4

2011/C 145/06

Case C-44/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 January 2011 — Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main V-Höchst v Deutsche Bank AG

6

2011/C 145/07

Case C-49/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 3 February 2011 — Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer

6

2011/C 145/08

Case C-56/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 February 2011 — Raiffeisen-Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main e.G. v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

7

2011/C 145/09

Case C-62/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 10 February 2011 — Florence Feyerbacher v Land Hessen, represented by the Regierungspräsidium Gießen

7

2011/C 145/10

Case C-68/11: Action brought on 16 February 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

8

2011/C 145/11

Case C-69/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium), lodged on 16 February 2011 — Connoisseur Belgium BVBA v Belgische Staat

8

2011/C 145/12

Case C-83/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) London (United Kingdom) made on 22 February 2011 — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman, Fazly Rabby Islam, Mohibullah Rahman

9

2011/C 145/13

Case C-84/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 24 February 2011 — Marja-Liisa Susisalo, Olli Tuomaala, Merja Ritala

9

2011/C 145/14

Case C-85/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

10

2011/C 145/15

Case C-86/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

11

2011/C 145/16

Case C-98/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2011 by Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG against the judgment of the General Court (FirstChamber) delivered on 17 December 2010 in Case T-336/08 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

11

2011/C 145/17

Case C-100/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by Helena Rubinstein, L'Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-345/08: Helena Rubinstein SNC, L'Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Allergan, Inc.

12

2011/C 145/18

Case C-103/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-19/07 Systran and Systran Luxembourg v Commission

Systran and Systran Luxembourg v Commission

13

2011/C 145/19

Case C-108/11: Action brought on 2 March 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

13

2011/C 145/20

Case C-117/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 4 March 2011 — Purple Parking Ltd, Airparks Services Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

14

2011/C 145/21

Case C-118/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Eon Asset Management OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’

15

2011/C 145/22

Case C-119/11: Action brought on 4 March 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

16

2011/C 145/23

Case C-120/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Yeboah Kwadwo

17

2011/C 145/24

Case C-123/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 March 2011 — A Oy

17

2011/C 145/25

Case C-129/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 March 2011 — OOD Provadiinvest v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’

17

General Court

2011/C 145/26

Case T-375/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Viega v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Participation in the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Relevant turnover — Attenuating circumstances)

19

2011/C 145/27

Case T-376/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Legris Industries v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement)

19

2011/C 145/28

Case T-377/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Comap v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Determination of the starting amount of the fine — Proportionality)

19

2011/C 145/29

Case T-378/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IMI and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Relevant turnover — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Equal treatment)

20

2011/C 145/30

Case T-379/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Kaimer and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Rights of the defence — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

20

2011/C 145/31

Case T-381/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — FRA.BO v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Attenuating circumstances — Immunity from fines — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment)

21

2011/C 145/32

Case T-382/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Tomkins v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Duration of the infringement)

21

2011/C 145/33

Case T-384/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IBP and International Building Products France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Aggravating circumstances)

22

2011/C 145/34

Case T-385/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Aalberts Industries and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Single and continuous infringement — Participation in the infringement)

22

2011/C 145/35

Case T-386/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Pegler v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — Deterrent effect)

23

2011/C 145/36

Case T-214/07: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Arable crops — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the smaller Aegean islands)

23

2011/C 145/37

Case T-117/08: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Italy v EESC (Rules on the use of languages — Vacancy notice concerning the recruitment of the Secretary-General of the EESC — Publication in three official languages — Information relating to the vacancy notice — Publication in all official languages — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 12 of the CEOS — Regulation No 1)

23

2011/C 145/38

Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid for Leipzig/Halle Airport — Funding of investments relating to the construction of the new southern runway — Decision declaring aid compatible with the common market — Actions for annulment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Airport infrastructure)

24

2011/C 145/39

Case T-33/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2011 — Portugal v Commission (Non-compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Penalty payment — Claim for payment — Repeal of the legislation at issue)

24

2011/C 145/40

Case T-54/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Natura Selection (Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil — Earlier Community figurative mark natura selection — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

25

2011/C 145/41

Case T-149/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Dover v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Review of the use of allowances — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Justification of expenditure — Recovery of undue payments)

25

2011/C 145/42

Case T-184/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 and Article 11(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Assessment of the risk of financial loss to the EAGGF — Principle of proportionality)

26

2011/C 145/43

Case T-419/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26

2011/C 145/44

Case T-503/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26

2011/C 145/45

Case T-14/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — CheckMobile v OHIM (carcheck) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ‘carcheck’ — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

27

2011/C 145/46

Joined Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL and Others) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)

27

2011/C 145/47

Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)

28

2011/C 145/48

Case T-100/11: Action brought on 17 February 2011 — MSE Pharmazeutika v OHIM — Merck Sharp & Dohme (SINAMIT)

28

2011/C 145/49

Case T-112/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission

29

2011/C 145/50

Case T-113/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission

30

2011/C 145/51

Case T-125/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

31

2011/C 145/52

Case T-149/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council

31

2011/C 145/53

Case T-151/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Telefónica de España and Telefónica Móviles España v Commission

32

2011/C 145/54

Case T-159/11: Action brought on 10 March 2011 — Marszałkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO)

33

2011/C 145/55

Case T-166/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Häfele v OHIM (Infront)

33

2011/C 145/56

Case T-167/11: Action brought on 15 March 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

34

2011/C 145/57

Case T-170/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Rivella International v OHIM — Baskaya di Baskaya & C. (BASKAYA)

34

2011/C 145/58

Case T-171/11: Action brought on 21 March 2011 — Hopf v OHIM (Clampflex)

35

2011/C 145/59

Case T-173/11: Action brought on 22 March 2011 — Hesse v OHIM — Porsche (Carrera)

35

2011/C 145/60

Case T-177/11: Action brought on 25 March 2011 — PASP and Others v Council

36

2011/C 145/61

Case T-178/11: Action brought on 18 March 2011 — Voss of Norway v OHIM — Nordic Spirit (Three-dimensional ‘bottle’)

36

2011/C 145/62

Case T-183/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Jacinto (My Little Bear)

37

2011/C 145/63

Case T-186/11: Action brought on 26 March 2011 — Schönberger v Parliament

37

2011/C 145/64

Case T-188/11: Action brought on 1 April 2011 — Chiboub v Council

38

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN