alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Lamont BOULWARE

No. COA17-22

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Diana M. Laing     
|                      |  | Diana M. Laing         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 20, 2017

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Plaintiff-Petitioner Governor Roy A. Cooper, III's Motion for Temporary Stay is dismissed as moot. Plaintiff-Petitioner Governor Roy A. Cooper, III's Petition for Writ of Supersedeas is decided as follows:

Under the authority granted to this Court pursuant to Article IV, Sections 1 and 12 of the North Carolina Constitution, and for the purpose of preserving the status quo during the expedited consideration of this case by the Court, the Court orders that:

1. The status quo as of the date of this order is to be maintained. Therefore, until further order of this Court, the parties are prohibited from taking further action regarding the unimplemented portions of the act that establishes a new "Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement." Act of Apr. 11, 2017, ch. 6, 2017 N.C. Sess. Laws ----, ---- (the Act). Likewise, the parties should not seek further enforcement of the order entered on 1 June 2017 by the three judge panel convened pursuant to N.C.G.S. 1-267.1.

2. During the consideration of this case by this Court, the parties have no duty to take action to implement further the provisions of the Act providing for the establishment, qualification, or organization of the Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement and, furthermore, may not proceed in any manner to make any appointments to, or to provide for, the reestablishment, re-qualification, re-organization, or re-constitution of the former North Carolina State Board of Elections or the North Carolina State Ethics Commission.

3. The parties may petition the Court for the purpose of obtaining any modifications to this order that they deem necessary to preserve the status quo and to ensure the orderly and lawful conducting of local and other elections during the consideration of this case by this Court.

"Motion Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2017."
FELTON v. BUTLER, et al.

161P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. David Felton, For Felton, David, For the State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of September 2017 by Plaintiff for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
# C_2009090EN.01003802.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 March 2009 — People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council

(Case T-157/07) (1)

1

2009/C 90/59

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Erin Lynn UPRIGHT

No. COA17-678

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2010 |  | /s/ Diana M. Laing     
|                    |  | Diana M. Laing         
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Susan Norcia GIUSTO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERTSON VENTURES, INC. d/b/a Servpro of Raleigh NE & North Durham, and Erie Insurance Exchange, Defendants.

No. COA17-1205

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES A. THOMAS 
|                      |  |  |  | James A. Thomas        
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE ISSUED AND SHALL BE HELD SUBJECT TO ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION AND THE BYLAWS OF THE CORPORATION AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND TO THE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND VOTING POWERS
OF THE PREFERRED STOCK OF THE CORPORATION NOW OR HEREAFTER OUTSTANDING.


 


THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE MORE THAN ONE CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK. A STATEMENT OF THE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, PRIVILEGES
AND RESTRICTIONS GRANTED TO OR IMPOSED UPON THE RESPECTIVE CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF STOCK OF THE CORPORATION AND UPON
THE HOLDERS THEREOF AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION MAY BE OBTAINED BY ANY STOCKHOLDER UPON REQUEST AND
WITHOUT CHARGE, AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION, AND THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH ANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST
AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF SUCH STATEMENT.


  


 


 


 


 


 


 





For value received, _________________________________________
hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto


 


 


PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE
OF ASSIGNEE


 


 


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF
ASSIGNEE


 


Shares of the capital stock represented
by the within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ____________________________ Attorney to transfer
the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Date: _________________


 


 


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH
THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1




(COMPASS BANK LOGO)                                   Compass Bank
                                                      P.O. Box 2006
                                                      Dothan, Alabama 36302
                                                      334-712-7030


March 22, 2002



Mr. Richard Bailey
Boyd Bros. Transportation, Inc.
3275 Highway 30
Clayton, AL 36016

RE:     CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMPASS BANK ("BANK") AND BOYD
        BROS. TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("BORROWER") DATED APRIL 11, 2000

Dear Richard:

For the period ending December 31, 2001, Boyd Bros. Transportation, Inc. was in
violation of Section 6.01 of the above referenced Credit and Security Agreement
(as amended, the "Agreement"). This is the Cash Flows-to-Current Maturity of
Long Term Debt covenant. You have requested and Bank has agreed to waive the
default of the covenant under the Loan Agreement existing as of December 31,
2001 solely by virtue of the violation of Section 6.01 of the Agreement, as
outlined above. This one-time limited waiver is effective only in the specific
instance and for the purpose for which given and nothing contained or provided
herein shall be construed as granting a waiver of any default except as
specifically set forth herein or as allowing Borrower to violate or fail to
perform fully (i) Section 6.01 after December 31, 2001 or (ii) any other
provisions of the Loan Documents at any time.

If the terms of this letter are acceptable to you, please execute this letter
below and return the original hereof to the Bank.



Sincerely,


/s/ Jim Tate
Jim Tate
Vice President

AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:

BOYD BROTHERS TRANSPORTATION, INC.

/s/ Richard Bailey
---------------------------
its COO
    -----------------------
Honorable Zollis C. Steakley

Secretary of State Capitol Station Austin, Texas. OPINION NO.W-38 Re:

Dear Sir: Deadline for filing application to appear on the officialballot at the Special Senatorial Election tobe held April 2, 1957. You have requested our official opinion on the question of the date of the deadline for filing an application to appear on the officialballot at the Special Senatorial Election for the office of United States Senator to be heldApril 2, 1957.

Article 4.10 of theTexas Election Code provideswith reference to the filing of the application:

"Suchapplicationmust be filed not later than thirty (30)days beftre any such special election

. . . . This provision states that no applicationmay be filed after a thirty day periodbefore the date of the special election. This date, in the casewhich you mention, would be March 2, 1957.

Our Interpretationof this statute Is substantiated by the case of Murchlson v. Darden, 171 S.W. 2d 220 (Tex.Civ.App. 1943, error dism.). The statute in this case provided that an absentee ballot must be castnot to the date of such an election"."less than three (3)days, prior The courtheld that this provision meant that three (3)full days must Intervenebetween the end of the last day of the period for casting an absentee ballot and the beginning of the day onwhich the electionwas to be held. We think that in the that theremust be thirty (30 P resent case thisholding dictates whole day8 between the ending of the time for filing the applicationmentioned InArticle 4.10 and the beginning of theday set for the special election.Ron. Zollle Steakley, page.2 - UU-38

Thus, all applications must be filed not later than mldnight March 2, 1957. Attorney General's Oplnions R-1164,0-4455, and O-2298, copies ofvhlch are here enclosed,also support the above conclusion.

SUMMARY

Application for one's name to appear upon the official ballot at the Special Senatorial Election called forApril 2, 1957,must be filed not later thanmldnight March 2, 1957. Yours very truly WILL WILSON



# Byz?. /6! -u-G--d B. K. Timmlns. Jr. Timmlns, Assistant torney General

At&ney ' JHM:zt APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE By H. Grady Chandler Chairman
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Phillip Manderscheid v. LAZ Parking Texas LLC and Boot Man, Inc. d/b/a Premier Parking Enforcement

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00362

- CV

Trial court case number: 1019656

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4 of Harris County

On September 9 , 2013 , the appellant filed a motion seeking corrections to the court reporter’s transcripts, or, alternatively, to abate the appeal and remand for hearings on purported
inaccuracies.

The Motion to A bate is GRANTED

. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(e)(3), the trial

court is ORDERED to hold a hearing, in accordance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.6(e)(2) to settle the dispute after providing notice of sam e to all parties

. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the Clerk of this Court of such date.

The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’ s record with the Court within 30 days of the date of this order . Additionally, the trial court’s findings and recommendations and any orders issued pursuant to this hearing shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no lat er than 30 days from
the date of this order

.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s rec ord of the hearing are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 19, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

D.K.D.,

Respondent

v.

A.L.C.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 330 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1534

PERE J. JARBOE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOGO WEST, in his capacity as Acting Secretary

of the Department of Veterans Affairs,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HERSHEL GOBER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

2832-MJG)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Pere J. Jarboe, Appellant Pro Se. Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Paige Elizabeth

Harrison, UNITED STATES FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Rockville,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Pere Jarboe appeals two district court’s orders, the first

granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing

Jarboe’s employment discrimination action under the Rehabilitation

Act, and the second denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Jarboe v. Gober, No. CA-98-2832-MJG (D.

Md. Feb. 11 & Apr. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
      32.1








The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of Saxon Capital, Inc. on the basis of such
      officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002:





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Saxon Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2006 (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
                August 9, 2006
            /s/
                Michael L. Sawyer
              
              Michael
                L. Sawyer
              Chief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Robert B. Eastep
              
              Robert
                B. Eastep
              Chief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Report
      and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the
      Report.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gary Harris, Appellant

No. 06-20-00086-CV v.

Paris Housing Authority, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court of Lamar

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C-11620). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below and reverse and remand the matter to the trial court with instructions to abate the 

underlying action until sufficient notice is provided and the proper procedures have been 

followed. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for further 

proceedings.

We further order that the appellee, Paris Housing Authority, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 30, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk