alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 278/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.278.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5618 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.278.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 278

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5618 October 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | | 2013/489/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Council and Commission Decision of 22 July 2013 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community within the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Council concerning a Decision of the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its rules of procedure | 1 |
| | | 2013/490/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Council and Commission Decision of 22 July 2013 on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part | 14 |
| Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part | 16 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

2013/489/EU, Euratom

*

Council and Commission Decision of 22 July 2013 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community within the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Council concerning a Decision of the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its rules of procedure

1

2013/490/EU, Euratom

*

Council and Commission Decision of 22 July 2013 on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part

14

Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part

16

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1138

GERALD R. BYRD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BP AMOCO POLYMERS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Movant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-3649-6-13AK)

Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald R. Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Ingrid Blackwelder Erwin, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald R. Byrd appeals the district court’s order of summary

judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Byrd v. BP Amoco Polymers, No. CA-99-

3649-6-13AK (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2001). We deny Byrd’s motion for production of documents and motion to compel delivery of documents.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Edward MitchellAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2014

No. 04-14-00741-CV

Deidre Elane SCHAMP,

Appellant

v.

Edward MITCHELL,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-20583

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 This appeal is retained on the docket of the court. We order appellant’s brief due January

5, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### STATE ex rel. Raymond G. SHAW v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2189.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Shaw, Raymond, G.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 98-5802; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 2002 KH 687.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Mark
        Gustafson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        to my
        knowledge that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle
        Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or
        its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/
        MARK GUSTAFSON
 Mark
        Gustafson
 Principal
        Financial Officer
 September
        20, 2005
HARPER v. The STATE.

A16A1008

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

June 8, 2018

David L. Harper, Atlanta, for Appellant.

Sharell Fincher Lewis, Rebecca Holmes Liles Grist, Macon, for Appellee.

Andrews, Judge.

In *Harper v. State* , 338 Ga. App. 535, 790 S.E.2d 552 (2016), we affirmed David Lamar Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a), reversed his conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to *599OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), vacated the trial court's sentence, and remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. In *State v. Harper* , 303 Ga. 144, 810 S.E.2d 484 (2018), the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider this Court's reversal of Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), and reversed our judgment on that issue by affirming Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2). Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, Harper's convictions for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a) and OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2) are affirmed, and trial court's sentence for those convictions is reinstated.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Doyle, P. J., and Ray, J., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00540-CR

Christopher Cheek, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. 2006CR1866, HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Christopher Cheek seeks to appeal his conviction for driving while license

suspended. Sentence was suspended on June 10, 2008, but the notice of appeal was not filed

until August 13, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). In the notice of appeal, Cheek’s counsel

acknowledges that the notice was not timely, but urges that “[t]he plan was to file a notice, but trial

counsel became very sick and pre-occupied” with other matters.

When a notice of appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported

appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State,

981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App.

1996). Cheek may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal under the circumstances, but he must seek

it bymeans of a post-conviction habeas corpus petition. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072

(West 2005).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 17, 2008

Do Not Publish
In the MATTER OF: T.L.B.

No. COA17-1326

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin Ray WILLIAMS.

No. 2002-KO-3071.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Williams, Melvin Ray; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 218,766; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36,456-KA.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1910-BJ] ES-053598, Group 22, Maine] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey, Maine; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         concerning the filing of a plat of survey. The notice contained an incorrect meridian description.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia                               ( print page 57895)                            22153, Attn: Cadastral Survey, 703-440-1688.                     

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 24, 2005, in FR Doc. 05-16815 on page 49669, under                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        , and “The lands we surveyed are”, correct “Township 1, Range 6, East of the West line of the State” to read: “Township 1, Range 6, West of the East line of the State”.                     

Dated: September 28, 2005. 

Stephen D. Douglas, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor. 

[FR Doc. 05-19887 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
----

(2004/C 70 E/214)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3022/03

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Funding of research into accident prevention

According to data produced by the European Accident Prevention Network, one third of fatalities in developed countries are caused by accidents, and young people are particularly affected.

In Greece, the number and frequency of fatal accidents of various types stand at extremely high levels.

In spite of this extremely worrying situation, the Commission recently cut the appropriations allocated to research into and prevention of accidents in European Union countries by 30 %, with the result that it has become considerably more difficult for the competent bodies to carry out their work.

Will the Commission support the proposals and requests made by the European Accident Prevention Network? What further steps will it take to reduce the number of fatal accidents and improve public safety?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(14 November 2003)

The Commission did not recently cut the appropriations allocated to research into and prevention of accidents in the Union by 30 %.

The proposals for financial support regarding accident and injury prevention received in the framework of the 2003 funding round of the Community public health programme are currently being evaluated. A decision on selection of projects to be financed is expected shortly. Several projects dealing with accidents and injuries have been presented in the selection process.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Smith                   
|David A. Smith                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer

May 23, 2008
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS AND

DILUTED  EARNINGS PER SHARE

---

|Year Ended March 31, | 2001 | 2000 | 1999
|-------------------- | ---- | ---- | ----

---

|Net income as reported | $4,000 | $4,700,000 | $3,930,000
|---------------------- | ------ | ---------- | ----------

---

|BASIC:Weighted average number of commonshares outstanding | 5,076,456 | 4,812,610 | 4,868,375
|--------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------

---

|Basic earnings per share | $0.00 | $0.98 | $0.81
|------------------------ | ----- | ----- | -----

---

|DILUTED:

Common and common equivalent sharesoutstanding:                                                                                                |           |           |          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|Weighted average number of commonshares outstanding                                                                                                      | 5,076,610 | 4,812,610 | 4,868,376
|Common stock equivalents from optionscomputed utilizing the treasury-stockmethod based on the average fair
marketvalue of common
stock during the period | 139,994   | 307,637   | 169,304  

---

|Shares used in the computation | 5,216,604 | 5,120,247 | 5,037,680
|------------------------------ | --------- | --------- | ---------

---

|Diluted earnings per share | $0.00 | $0.92 | $0.78
|-------------------------- | ----- | ----- | -----

---
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Curtis, Chief Executive Officer of Greenlite Ventures
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ John Curtis        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | JOHN CURTIS            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | February 22, 2007      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
  be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUOTIN 

Honorable B. Jay Jackson 

County Attorney 

Somervsll Cotlnty 

Glen Rose, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Ne are in receip 

1939, in which you submit 

department for an opinion 

to make of the 

stribution 

into the 

of the County, ena 

the County Aveilw if this is legal. 

x-Officio County SuThis was clone from 

would like to know if this 

habitant of the State between the age.? of 21 and 60 yeare 

shall be set apart annually for the benefit of the public 

free schools. This money becomes e part of the State Available School Fund. Article 2823, Revised Civil Statutes 

or 1925. 

Article 7046, Revised Civil Statutes of 1925, 

provides as follows: 
Honorable B. Jay Jackson, Page 2 

"There shall be 

every person between 

resident within this 

January of each year 

of $1.50, one dollar 

levied and collected from 

the ages of 21 and 60 years, 

stztz on the first day of 

an annual poll tax 

for tie benefit of the free 

schools, and fifty cents for general revenue 

purposes. Said tax shall be collected .and accounted for by the tax collector each year and 

appropriated as herein required. No county shall 

levy more than twenty-five cent poll tax for 

county purposes. * * *" 

The statutes and Constitution relating to the 

disposition and division of the poll tax make a well-defined 

distinction between that part of the tax which shall be.used 

for free school 'purposes, and the portion to be used for 

general purposes. In authorizing the levy of the county 

poll tax of twenty-five cents, no provision is made that 

such tax should be apportioned or divided between the schools 

and the county, but on the other hand, the statute provides 

that such tax shall be for "county purposes". By designating that the county poll tax should be levied for county purposes, it was evidently intended that the money thus received 

should be used for general county purposes, and is properly 

credited to the general fund of the county. If it had been 

intended to apportion the twenty-five cent county poll tax 

between general county purposes and free sohool purposes, the 

Legislature, would no doubt have specifically so provided. 

It is our opinion that the twenty-five cent poll 

tax authorized to be levied and collected for county purposes 

should be paid into the general fund of the county, and that 

no portion of it should belpaid into the county available 

school fund. 

We await your brief on your second question as 

requested in our letter of October 25, 1939. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

BY 

Cecil C. Cammack 

Assistant 

CCC:LW 

APPROVED DEC 1, 1939 

(a) Gerald C. Kann 

AlTORNEYClWERAL OF TZSXAS 

APPROVED 

opinion committee 

By BWB 

chairmen
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on Thursday, November 17, 2005. 

The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The purpose of the Commission is to assist Federal, State and local authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated resource management plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor. 

The meeting will convene on November 17, 2005 at 7 p.m. at Alternatives Unlimited, 54 Douglas Road, Whitinsville, MA 01588 for the following reasons: 

1. Approval of Minutes.

2. Chairman's Report.

3. Executive Director's Report.

4. Financial Budget.

5. Public Input.

It is anticipated that about twenty-five people will be able to attend the session in addition to the Commission members. 

Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made prior to the meeting to: Larry Gall, Interim Executive Director, John H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250. 

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Larry Gall, Interim Executive Director of the Commission at the aforementioned address. 

Larry Gall, 

Interim Executive Director, BRVNHCC. 

[FR Doc. 05-19562 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P