alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") of BV Pharmaceutical,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Lee Southern,  Chief Financial  Officer of BV  Pharmaceutical,  Inc.,  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 10, 2005                          /s/ LEE SOUTHERN
                                             ___________________________
                                                 Lee Southern
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00113

- CV

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Ernest VALDEZ, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 12244 Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due on March 26 , 20 20

. On April 7
, 2022 , this court notified Ms. Blanca Espericueta, the court reporter responsible for preparing the record

, that the record was late. Ms. Espericueta was instructed to file a notification of late record no later than ten days from the date of our notification if the reporter’s record had not been filed becau se the fee for its preparation had not been paid. Otherwise, Ms. Espericueta was instructed to file the reporter’s record no later than thirty days from the date of our notification

. On April 18, 2022, Ms. Espericueta filed a n otification of l ate r ecord st ating that , due to her additional duties, she need ed additional time in which to file the record. Ms. Espericueta estimated the record would be complete within thirty to sixty days.

Ms. Espericueta ‘s request for additional time is GRANTED IN PART . Ms. Espericueta is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record no later than May 9, 2022

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of April, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Marshall B. PITTS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. John Wayne TART; Investigative Solutions Isnc, LLC; Jimmy Lamar Henley, Jr.; and Crystal Nicole Justesen, Defendants.

No. COA17-232

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

REVERSED. REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                      WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV L.P.,SERIES 4 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
To Fixed Charges
 Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Net income
    
    $
    39,561
    
    
    $
    26,645
    
    
    $
    40,338
    
    
    $
    28,223
    
    
    $
    27,556
    
    
    $
    34,488Add total fixed charges (per below)
    
    
    18,703
    
    
    
    24,751
    
    
    
    15,125
    
    
    
    14,815
    
    
    
    11,324
    
    
    
    2,279Total earnings
    
    $
    58,264
    
    
    $
    51,396
    
    
    $
    55,463
    
    
    $
    43,038
    
    
    $
    38,880
    
    
    $
    36,767Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    16,225
    
    
    $
    21,763
    
    
    $
    13,289
    
    
    $
    13,056
    
    
    $
    9,633
    
    
    $
    697Capitalized interest
    
    
    871
    
    
    
    1,007
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimate of interest within rental expense(1)
    
    
    1,607
    
    
    
    1,981
    
    
    
    1,836
    
    
    
    1,759
    
    
    
    1,691
    
    
    
    1,582Total fixed charges
    
    $
    18,703
    
    
    $
    24,751
    
    
    $
    15,125
    
    
    $
    14,815
    
    
    $
    11,324
    
    
    $
    2,279Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.12
    
    
    
    2.08
    
    
    
    3.67
    
    
    
    2.91
    
    
    
    3.43
    
    
    
    16.13
 
 (1)
    
    Represents 30% of the total operating lease rental expense which is that portion deemed to be
interest.
EXHIBIT32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




ANSWERS
CORPORATION




FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I am the Chief
Financial Officer of Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).




Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.










Date: May 5,
      2010/s/ Steven
      SteinbergSteven
      SteinbergChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
MEINCK v. CITY OF GASTONIA

130PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Meinck, Joan A.

Martha Raymond Thompson, Attorney at Law, Gastonia, Ryan L. Bostic, Attorney at Law, Aaron C. Low, Attorney at Law, Gastonia, for City of Gastonia.

Andrew J. Santaniello, Attorney at Law, Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Associate General Counsel, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of August 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Plaintiff-Appellee shall have up to and including the 9th day of October 2017 to file and serve his/ her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel P. OBrien, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.

August 3, 2010



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DANIEL P. OBRIEN                               
|Daniel P. OBrien                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Cause No. 2014-CI-03033 

MOAB CONSTRUCTION § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

 §

v. § 407th JUDICAL DISTRICT 

§

ALS 88 DESIGN BUILD, LLC § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS 

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

Now Comes, ALS 88 Design Build, LLC, and files this Amended Notice of Appeal as follows: 

I.

This suit involves a claim for damages by MOAB Construction Company, Inc. arising out of a 

construction project wherein ALS 88 Design Build, LLC was hired as a licensed and registered Architect 

to provide specifications and design plans for the project. MOAB terminated the services of ALS 88 

Design Build, LLC and thereafter filed this suit. ALS 88 Design Build, LLC filed a motion to dismiss 

MOAB Construction Company’s claims pursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §150.002(b) & (e), 

asserting the certificate of merit filed by MOAB to support its claims failed to comply with the 

mandatory requirements of §150.002(b). 

At a hearing on the motion preceding a trial on the merits on February 23, 2015, the trial court 

denied the motion and ALS 88 Design Build, LLC gave oral notice of interlocutory appeal; Tex. Civ. 

Prac. & Rem. Code §150.002(f) provides for an immediate interlocutory appeal from an order granting 

or denying a motion to dismiss under this chapter. Thereafter a written notice of interlocutory appeal and 

emergency motion to stay jury trial was filed. 

This court denied the emergency motion to stay the jury trial of this case on February 27, 2015 

and thereafter the trial of this case commenced on March 2, 2015. A jury returned a verdict on March 5, 

2015 in favor of Moab Construction Company, Inc. against ALS 88 Design Build, LLC. Thereafter ALS 

88 Design Build, LLC gave oral notice of appeal; ALS 88 Design Build, LLC now files this amended 

notice of appeal from the jury verdict and judgment (not yet entered) in favor of Moab Construction 

Company, Inc. in the above styled and numbered appeal. 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00096-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/5/2015 3:38:03 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 03/5/2015 3:38:03 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted this the 5

th day of March, 2015. 

Regina Bacon Criswell

Attorney and Counselor at Law

Carriage Place

 7803 Bent Briar

San Antonio, Texas 78250

 By: /S/Regina Bacon Criswell

 SBN: 01496580

 (210) 775-1155 (ofc)

 (210) 251-2071 (fax) 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and forgoing was served in 

accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the persons listed below in the 

manner indicated. 

Tom Hall Via e-file

Attorney for MOAB Construction Company, Inc.

 /S/Regina Bacon Criswell

REGINA B. CRISWELL
Exhibit 12.1

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of TIM Participações S.A.;

 

2.	Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.	I am responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

a)	Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)	Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)	Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.	I have disclosed, based on my mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)	All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Dated: April 14, 2016
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of Pure Biofuels Corp.
(the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 16, 2010/s/
      Juan SantoyoJuan
      Santoyo, Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     Mar-31-1996
<CASH>                                              460,874
<SECURITIES>                                      1,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,446,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                        145,616
<INVENTORY>                                         933,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,936,770
<PP&E>                                            3,294,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,149,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,614,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               700,160
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             25,155
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,660,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,614,825
<SALES>                                           7,784,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7,784,016
<CGS>                                             2,471,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,471,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5,952,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    152,339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  111,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (835,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (34,169)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (801,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (801,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.33)
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Arthur LITTLE

No. COA16-480

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10973 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus $7,298.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant, LEONEL GAMEZ RODRIGUEZ, Claimant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-0697

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leonel Gamez Rodriguez appeals the grant of a default judgment in favor of the Government following a civil in rem forfeiture proceeding and the district court's denial of his motion to amend his answer to the Government's complaint against the property. We presume without deciding that Rodriguez, whoNo. 95-10973 - 2 - did not file a verified claim and was not permitted to file an answer, had standing to challenge the default and has standing to appeal. We have reviewed Rodriguez's brief and the record, and we find no reversible error. See United States v. $38,570 U.S. Currency, 950 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. One 1988 Dodge Pickup, 959 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. One 1978 Piper Navajo PA-31 Aircraft, 748 F.2d 316 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  
 I,
Steven  Steinberg, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GuruNet
      Corporation;
 
 2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by this report;
 
 3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
      other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have;
 a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  b) [Paragraph
omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release
34-47986]
  c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
      committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):
 a) All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the such auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
  /s/
      Steven SteinbergDate:
      May 11, 2005
    Steven
      Steinberg
      Chief
      Financial Officer
      (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  25