alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137883 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137883 

 COA: 279183 

Kalamazoo CC: 06-000902-FC 

ANDRE McKINLEY BELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Patty MEADOWS

No. 400PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Mr. Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Mr. Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for NC State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st of November 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of November 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15 (g)(2).
#### Roger MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D02-1072.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 19, 2003.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 *514L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *Blanco v. State,*702 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1997).

SAWAYA, C.J., THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.8

 

April 1, 2013

 

EXCEL MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.

 

19500 Jamboree Road

 

Irvine, California 92612

 

Dear Borrower:

 

This letter is to confirm that WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”) has agreed to extend the maturity date of that certain credit accommodation granted by Bank to EXCEL MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. (“Borrower”) in the maximum principal amount of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00) pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Bank and Borrower dated as of April 1, 2011, as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”).

 

The maturity date of said credit accommodation is hereby extended until June 1, 2013.  Until such date, all terms and conditions of the Agreement which pertain to said credit accommodation shall remain in full force and effect, except as expressly modified hereby.  The promissory note dated as of April 1, 2012, executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank which evidences said credit accommodation (the “Note”), shall be deemed modified as of the date this letter is acknowledged by Borrower to reflect the new maturity date set forth above.   All other terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification.

 











 

Borrower acknowledges that Bank has not committed to make any renewal or further extension of the maturity date of the above-described credit accommodation beyond the new maturity date specified herein, and that any such renewal or further extension remains in the sole discretion of Bank.  This letter constitutes the entire agreement between Bank and Borrower with respect to the maturity date extension for the above-described credit accommodation, and supersedes all prior negotiations, discussions and correspondence concerning said extension.

 

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained herein by dating and signing one copy below and returning it to my attention at the above address on or before April 8, 2013.

 

2











 

	
 
    	
Very   truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
WELLS   FARGO BANK,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
NATIONAL   ASSOCIATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Erin K. Boyle
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Erin   K. Boyl, Assistant Vice President
    


 

 

Acknowledged and accepted as of 4/1/13 :

 

 

EXCEL MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
Todd   R. Taylor
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Todd   R. Taylor, EVP, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer
    	
 
    


 

3
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName: Freddie M. KotekTitle: Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: May 13, 2011
#### Gregory JOHNSON v. Richard STALDER, et al.

No. 2002-CI-2221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Johnson, Gregory; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 491,278; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 1279.

Denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7154** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARCO ANTRIONE CHERRY, JR., a/k/a Marco Antrione Cherry , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00071

- RGD

- FBS

- 1; 2:14

- cv - 00283

- RGD )

Submitted : December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23 , 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marco Antrione Cherry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions a re not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Marco Ant r i o ne Cherry, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion , and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion
. The order s are not appealabl e unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 5 29 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion state s a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cherry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Frank GLADNEY, III

No. COA17-831

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 15, 2018

NO ERROR.
II 

Calendar No. 590 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYNTHIA JENKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard in 

6 Springfield Gardens, New York, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3957 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 590 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postthia Jenkins Post Office Building’’. in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the ‘‘Cyn- al Service located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5223-5224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1941]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5 p.m. March 9-11, 2005.

Place: Hilton Hawaiian Village, 2005 Kalia Road, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: Reports from the Chairperson and the 
Executive Director, Team Reports, Panel Discussion on Emergency 
Preparedness for People with Disabilities, Panel Discussion on Outdoor 
Activities for People with Disabilities; Joint Session with the Hawaii 
Disability and Communications Board, Briefing on Consumer-Directed 
Health Care and Olmstead Implementation, Unfinished Business, New 
Business, Announcements, Adjournment.

[[Page 5224]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark S. Quigley, Director of 
Communications, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW., 
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; (202) 272-2004 (voice), (202) 272-2074 
(TTY), (202) 272-2022 (fax), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#721f03071b151e170b321c11165c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f120e0a1618131a063f111c1b51181009">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).
    Agency Mission: The National Council on Disability (NCD) is an 
independent federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the 
President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its overall purpose is to 
promote policies, programs, practices, and procedures that guarantee 
equal opportunity for all people with disabilities, including people 
from culturally diverse backgrounds, regardless of the nature or 
significance of the disability; and to empower people with disabilities 
to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion 
and integration into all aspects of society.
    Accommodations: Those needing sign language interpreters or other 
disability accommodations should notify NCD at least one week before 
this meeting.
    Language Translation: In accordance with E.O. 13166, Improving 
Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, those 
people with disabilities who are limited English proficient and seek 
translation services for this meeting should notify NCD at least one 
week before this meeting.
    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/Environmental Illness: People with 
multiple chemical sensitivity/environmental illness must reduce their 
exposure to volatile chemical substances to attend this meeting. To 
reduce such exposure, NCD requests that attendees not wear perfumes or 
scented products at this meeting. Smoking is prohibited in meeting 
rooms and surrounding areas.

    Dated: January 28, 2005.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 05-1941 Filed 1-28-05; 1:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In re CHEMICAL RELEASE AT BOGALUSA.

No. 2003-CC-2498.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 2003.

In re Plaintiffs Liason Committee;— Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 73,341; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2003 CW 1848.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.
In the MATTER OF: A.C.H., R.B.H., R.D.H., Jr., J.D.G.

No. COA17-1063

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                       ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned certifies that she is an Assistant Vice President of GreenPoint
Credit, LLC (the "Servicer") and that, as such, she is duly authorized to
execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Servicer pursuant to
Section 4.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as
of November 1, 1998 between Green Point Credit Corp., as Seller and Servicer,
and The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee, (all capitalized terms used
herein without definition having the respective meanings specified in the
Agreement) and further certifies that:

1.   I have reviewed the activities for the one year period ending December 31,
     1999 and performance under this agreement has been made under such
     officer's supervision under Section 4.20 of the Agreement; and

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
     fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto my signature this 29th day of
February, 2000.



                                        GREENPOINT CREDIT, LLC

                                        By /s/ Mary Churley
                                           ----------------
                                           Mary Churley
                                           Assistant Vice President and Manager
                                           Investor Servicing
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOK POR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73173

Agency No. A027-746-307

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Sok Por, a native and citizen of Cambodia, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on

ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Avagyan v. Holder,

646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Por’s motion to reopen as

untimely because the motion was filed more than eight years after the BIA’s final

order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Por failed to establish the due

diligence required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Avagyan, 646

F.3d at 678-80 (equitable tolling is available to a petitioner who establishes that he

suffered from deception, fraud or error, and exercised due diligence in discovering

such circumstances).

In light of our disposition, we need not reach Por’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 11-73173
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D1 7

- 2 370

_____________________________
V ICTOR J EROME B ELL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford , Judge.

May 1 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

. Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the le gal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his judgment and s entence, the Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should no t be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) (requiring that courts “first provide notice and an opportun ity to respond before preventing [a] litigant from bringing further attacks on his or her conviction and sentence”). A ppellant’s response to the show cause order does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the imposition of sanctions.

Because Appellant’s co ntinu ed and repeated attacks on his judgment and s entence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold th at he is barred from future pro se filings in this Court2 concerning Escambia County Circuit Court case number 2012

- CF

1842 . The Clerk of the Cour t is directed not to accept any future filings concerning this case unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Appellant is warned that any filings that violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropria te institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

R OWE , R AY , and M AKAR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Victor Jerome Bell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radial Energy Inc. (formerly BV
Pharmaceutical, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy Hadley, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 18, 2006



                                        By: /s/ G. LEIGH LYONS
                                            ___________________________
                                                G. Leigh Lyons
                                                Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Quentin Odell MATHIS

No. 354P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Mathis, Quentin Odell.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Smith                   
|David A. Smith                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer

May 26, 2006