alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. Roe Buckleycertify that: 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne EnergyPartners 05-A, L.P. 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting tobe designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:                August 16, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK OKEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 822 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Roger C. CASSIDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D02-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 5, 2003.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

THOMPSON, J.

Roger C. Cassidy appeals his convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and tampering with evidence. We affirm.

Cassidy claims that the pocketknife he carried could not have been a deadly weapon. The jury was instructed that “[a] weapon is a ‘deadly weapon’ if it is used or threatened to be used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm.” Cassidy displayed the open pocketknife to the store clerk and threatened to cut her throat. *Compare Durden v. State,*743 So.2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (affirming conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon where the defendant held the open blade of a pocketknife to the victim’s throat). We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to make it a jury question whether the pocketknife wielded by Cassi-dy was a deadly weapon. *See Dale v. State,*703 So.2d 1045, 1047 (Fla.1997) (whether a particular weapon is in fact deadly is a jury question).

Cassidy was also convicted of tampering with evidence, and he claims that the court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree. Cassidy was charged in one count with hiding a piece of crack, a bag of marijuana, and a soda can modified so that it could be used as a pipe. A police officer testified that he saw Cassidy put the bag of marijuana under the seat, the soda can between the seats, and what looked like a piece of crack into his mouth. The soda can had what appeared to be crack residue on it *595and the contents of the bag field tested to be marijuana. Although the object Cassi-dy put in his mouth was never recovered and the can was never tested, there was enough evidence for the jury to infer that Cassidy was tampering with evidence when he disposed of the crack-like object and hid the other two items.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
#### Ekon AIRALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-1925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

Ekon Airall, Perry, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and August A. Bonavita, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ekon Airall seeks review of an order that dismissed his rule 3.850 as lacking a proper oath, and form. We accept the state’s concession and reverse and remand for the trial court to consider Airall’s properly filed motion. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of May 8, 2013, by and between Galena Biopharma, Inc. (formerly RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation), a Delaware corporation (“Employer”), and Mark J. Ahn, Ph.D.,
an individual and resident of the State of Oregon (“Employee”), with reference to the following facts: 

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2011 (the “Employment
Agreement”), pursuant to which Employee serves as Employer’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and 

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects as provided in this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged,
Employer and Employee hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Definitions. Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall
have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Employment Agreement. References in the Employment Agreement and this Amendment to this “Agreement” mean the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment and as further amended from
time to time as provided in the Employment Agreement. 
 2. Amendments. 

(a) References in the Employment Agreement to “RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the “Company” and “Employer”
shall mean Galena Biopharma, Inc. 
 (b) The reference in Section 2 of the Employment Agreement to Employer’s offices
in “Worcester, Massachusetts,” is hereby amended to read “Portland, Oregon, or its environs.” 
 (c) The
parties acknowledge and agree that the Minimum 2011 Financing was timely achieved for all purposes of the Employment Agreement. 

(d) Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

4. Term. Employee’s employment shall commence on the Effective Date and shall terminate on December 31,
2016 (the “Term”), unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 6. Neither Employer nor Employee shall have any obligation to extend or renew this Agreement. 

  
 1 








 (e) References in Section 13 of the Employment Agreement to “California” are
hereby amended to “California” are hereby amended to read “Oregon.” 
 3. No Other Changes to the
Employment Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first set
forth above. 
  

							
	GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC.	 		 	EMPLOYEE
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Sanford J. Hillsberg
	 		 	 /s/ Mark J. Ahn

		 	Sanford J. Hillsberg, Chairman	 		 	Mark J. Ahn, Ph.D.


  
 3
AVOKI v. EAGLE ADJUSTING SERV. INC., et al.

381P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Francisco K. Avoki, For Avoki, Francisco K., et al.

Veronique K. Pongo.

Mica Nguyen Worthy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Eagle Adjusting Serv., Inc., et al.

Robert M. Rubin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, For Eagle Adjusting Serv., Inc., et al.

Walter M. Dennis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Eagle Adjusting Serv., Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of November 2017 by Plaintiffs for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-79225 and 333-51034) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 1998 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-51032) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (FormS-8 Nos. 333-115763 and 333-131800) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2003 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-117889) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan, and (Form S-8 No. 333-124955)pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Award Plan of our reports dated November 16, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, Corinthian Colleges,Inc. and subsidiaries management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended June 30, 2006. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Orange County, California 

November 27, 2006
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 20, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1149

Lower Tribunal No. F14-700

________________

Edward R. Brown,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Edward R. Brown, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

y0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139793 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139793 

 COA: 291933 

St. Clair CC: 03-003005-FC 

TIMOTHY DELBERT TEICHOW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Christopher Wood                                                                                                                            |   | By:    | /s/                  David Koontz                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                  Christopher Wood                                                                                                                          |   |   | Name:                  David Koontz                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | Title:                  Chief Executive Officer                             (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   | Title:                  Chief Financial Officer            (Principal                  Financial and    Accounting                  Officer) |

----
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, Paul Tidwell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 16, 2013  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-2666

________________ _____________
K ENNETH N EWSOME , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

February 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________

Kenneth Newsome, pro se, Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody, Attorney Gene ral, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4482 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4482

 To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and Technology 
            account of the Environmental Protection Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and Technology 
            account of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING PROHIBITION.

    No funds are authorized to be appropriated for the Science and 
Technology account of the Environmental Protection Agency.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 450 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 450

  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to bring the 
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection into the regular appropriations 
                    process, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2013

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to bring the 
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection into the regular appropriations 
                    process, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. BRINGING THE BUREAU INTO THE REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS.

    Section 1017 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5497) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by amending the heading of such subsection to 
                read as follows: ``Budget, Financial Management, and 
                Audit.--'';
                    (B) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and (3);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 
                paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and
                    (D) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated--
                            (i) by striking subparagraph (E); and
                            (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 
                        subparagraph (E);
            (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c);
            (3) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively; and
            (4) in subsection (c), as so redesignated--
                    (A) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated such funds as may be necessary to carry out 
        this title for fiscal year 2013.''; and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (2).
                                 <all>
```