alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3063 

ROCCO SANTOMENNO, 

 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 

 Respondent. 

Alan J. Baldwin, Broderick, Newmark & Grather, Morristown, New Jersey, for 

petitioner. 

Elizabeth A. Holt, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With her on the brief 

were Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, 

and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. 

 

Appealed from: Arbitrator’s Decision 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

* Honorable William H. Alsup, District Judge, United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3063 

ROCCO SANTOMENNO, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 

Respondent. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the ARBITRATOR’S DECISION 

In CASE NO(S). 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL, Circuit Judges, and ALSUP*, District Judge). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _October 9, 2008___ / s / Jan Horbaly

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
# Official Journal L 339/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 339 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6019 December 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 339

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6019 December 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2336 of 7 February 2017 SA.21877 (C 24/2007), SA.27585 (2012/C) and SA.31149 (2012/C) — Germany Alleged State aid to Flughafen Lübeck GmbH, Infratil Limited, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport
  (notified under document C(2017) 602)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2337 of 29 May 2017 on the amounts allocated to the provision of technical support in the agricultural sector as well as to the production and marketing of quality agricultural products pursuant to the Milk and Fat Law under State aid SA.35484 (2013/C) (ex SA.35484 (2012/NN))
  (notified under document C(2017) 3487) | 50 |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/2338 of 16 November 2017 establishing a common ‘Return Handbook’ to be used by Member States' competent authorities when carrying out return-related tasks | 83 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2336 of 7 February 2017 SA.21877 (C 24/2007), SA.27585 (2012/C) and SA.31149 (2012/C) — Germany Alleged State aid to Flughafen Lübeck GmbH, Infratil Limited, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport
  (notified under document C(2017) 602)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2017) 602)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2337 of 29 May 2017 on the amounts allocated to the provision of technical support in the agricultural sector as well as to the production and marketing of quality agricultural products pursuant to the Milk and Fat Law under State aid SA.35484 (2013/C) (ex SA.35484 (2012/NN))
  (notified under document C(2017) 3487)

(notified under document C(2017) 3487)

50

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/2338 of 16 November 2017 establishing a common ‘Return Handbook’ to be used by Member States' competent authorities when carrying out return-related tasks

83

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2005069EN.01002401.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/24

---

Action brought on 7 January 2004 by Castell del Remei S.L against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-13/05)

(2005/C 69/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 7 January 2004 by Castell del Remei S.L, represented by Jorge Grau Mora and Alejandro Angulo, of the Barcelona Bar; Maria Baylos Morales and Antonio Velazquez Ibanez, of the Madrid Bar; Fernand de Visscher, Emmanuel Cornu, Eric de Gryse and Donatienne Moreau, of the Brussels Bar, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | set aside the decision of the First Board of Appeal, of 27 October 2004, delivered in Case R 0691/2003-1; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

set aside the decision of the First Board of Appeal, of 27 October 2004, delivered in Case R 0691/2003-1; and

| 2. | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | The applicant |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘ODA’ — Application No 1.655.786, for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages, except beers) |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Bodegas Roda S.A. |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | International word mark ‘RODA’ (No 703.486), Spanish word mark ‘BODEGAS RODA’ (No 1.757.553), ‘RODA II’ (No 2.006.615), ‘RODA I’ (No 2.006.616), and Greek national mark ‘RODA’ (No 137.050) for wines and spirits in Class 33 and the trade name ‘BODEGAS RIOJA’ for the ‘business dedicated to the creation and production of wines’. |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld and application refused. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed. |
| Pleas in law: | Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

The applicant

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark ‘ODA’ — Application No 1.655.786, for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages, except beers)

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Bodegas Roda S.A.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

International word mark ‘RODA’ (No 703.486), Spanish word mark ‘BODEGAS RODA’ (No 1.757.553), ‘RODA II’ (No 2.006.615), ‘RODA I’ (No 2.006.616), and Greek national mark ‘RODA’ (No 137.050) for wines and spirits in Class 33 and the trade name ‘BODEGAS RIOJA’ for the ‘business dedicated to the creation and production of wines’.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld and application refused.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law:

Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael C. Yerington, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL C. YERINGTON             
|Michael C. Yerington                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|September 9, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the 
FTC Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgia Koliopoulos, Director of Human 
Resources, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 
326-2364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the Performance Review Board 
(PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews 
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance 
by the supervisor, and makes recommendations regarding performance 
ratings to the Chairman.
    The following individuals have been designated to serve on the 
Commission's Performance Review Board:

Charles H. Schneider, Executive Director, Chairman
Susan Creighton, Director, Bureau of Competition
Lydia B. Parnes, Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection
Michael A. Salinger, Director, Bureau of Economics
William Blumenthal, General Counsel
Maryanne S. Kane, Chief of Staff

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19660 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
EXHIBIT 4.6
SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE
COINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION and its successors under the Indenture, jointly and severally with anyother Subsidiary Guarantors, hereby irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee, on a senior securedbasis, (i) the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on theNotes, whether at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of intereston the overdue principal of and interest, if any, on the Notes, to the extent lawful, and the dueand punctual performance of all other obligations of Coinmach Service Corp. (the “Company”) to theHolders or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms set forth in Article Ten of the Indenture,(ii) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such otherobligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in accordance withthe terms of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise and(iii) have agreed to pay any and all costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees)incurred by the Trustee or any Holder in enforcing any rights under this Subsidiary Guarantee.Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture unless otherwiseindicated.
No stockholder, employee, officer, director or incorporator, as such, past, present or future, ofCOINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION shall have any personal liability under this Subsidiary Guarantee byreason of his or its status as such stockholder, employee, officer, director or incorporator. EachHolder by accepting this Subsidiary Guarantee waives and releases all such liability. The waiverand release are part of the consideration for issuance of the Notes and Subsidiary Guarantees.This Subsidiary Guarantee shall be binding upon COINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION and its successors andassigns and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Trustee and the Holdersand, in the event of any transfer or assignment of rights by any Holder or the Trustee, the rightsand privileges herein conferred upon that party shall automatically extend to and be vested in suchtransferee or assignee, all subject to the terms and conditions hereof.
This Subsidiary Guarantee shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose until the certificate ofauthentication on the Note upon which this Subsidiary Guarantee is noted shall have been executedby the Trustee under the Indenture by the manual signature of one of its authorized officers.
THE TERMS OF ARTICLE TEN OF THE INDENTURE ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE.
 

 

This Subsidiary Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of theState of New York.             COINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION              By:   /s/ Robert M. Doyle            Name: Robert M. Doyle       Title: Chief Financial Officer, Senior         Vice President, Secretary andTreasurer    
Dated: November 24, 2004
#### STATE ex rel. Robert RAYFORD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KP-2930.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Rayford, Robert; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. W-96-8-754; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 KW 1522.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
EX-10.19




 Exhibit 10.19 

AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 27TH
day of June 2014, by and between Infor (US), Inc., a Delaware corporation and successor in interest to Infor Global Solutions (Michigan), Inc. (the “Company”), and C. James Schaper (“Executive”). 

The Company and Executive are party to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2010 (the
“Agreement”). The Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement upon the terms set forth herein. 
 In consideration
of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Amendment to the Preamble of the Agreement. The second sentence of the preamble paragraph of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following: 
 The Company is an indirect, wholly-owned Subsidiary of Infor Enterprise Applications, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (“Parent”). 
 2. Amendment to Section 4(a) of the Agreement. 

Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

The employment period (the “Employment Period”) will commence on the Commencement Date and will terminate immediately upon the
first to occur of: (i) December 6, 2016, (ii) the effective date of Executive’s resignation with or without Good Reason (as defined below); (iii) Executive’s death or Disability (as defined in Internal Revenue Code
Section 22(e)(3)); or (iv) the Company’s election to terminate Executive’s employment at any time for Cause (as defined below) or without Cause. 

3. References to and Effect on Agreement. Except as expressly modified by SECTIONS 1 and 2 of this Amendment, the Agreement
shall continue and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. All references to the Agreement shall hereafter mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 

4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal, substantive laws of
the State of Georgia, without giving effect to the conflict of laws rules thereof. 








 5. Headings. Section headings in this Amendment are included herein for convenience of
reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment for any other purposes. 
 6. Execution in Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts and delivered via facsimile, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	INFOR (US), INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gregory M. Giangiordano

	Name:	 	Gregory M. Giangiordano
	Its:	 	President
	
	 /s/ C. JAMES SCHAPER

	C. JAMES SCHAPER
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement of
Indigo N.V. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-10408) and on Form F-3
(Registration Nos. 333-8540, 333-6724 and 333-5124) of our report dated
February 20, 2001, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Indigo N.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A.


Tel-Aviv, Israel                             /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
February 13, 2002                            Kesselman & Kesselman
                                             Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)


Kesselman & Kesselman is a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
Limited, a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CEO OF PERIODIC REPORT**     The undersigned, Kevin R. Callahan, Chief Executive Officer of Affirmative Insurance Holdings,Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of his knowledge, that:(1) the Interim Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.Dated: November 9, 2006  /s/ Kevin R. Callahan     Kevin R. Callahan    Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Lawrence CHAPMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2268.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Chapman, Lawrence; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. IV, No. 2-97-648; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002-KW-0547.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4189 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4189

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ``Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon 
and Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2014

 Mr. Stivers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ``Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon 
and Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON AND MASTER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. 
              RIECK AND VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon and Master Sergeant 
Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Shawn T. Hannon and Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```