alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned officers and/or
directors of Valley Financial Corporation, a Virginia corporation (Valley), does hereby constitute and appoint Ellis L. Gutshall and Kimberly B. Snyder, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), his true and lawful
Attorneys in Fact and Agents for him and on his behalf and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities and particularly as an officer and/or director of Valley, to sign, execute and affix his seal thereto and file any of the documents
referred to below:

Annual Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 on Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, together with all
exhibits and any and all documents required to be filed with respect thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and all other appropriate regulatory authorities;

granting unto said Attorneys and each of them full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to effectuate the same as fully, to
all intents and purposes, as he himself might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and affirming all that said Attorneys in Fact and Agents or each of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Anna L. Lawson           
|                             
|/s/ George W. Logan          
|                             
|/s/ Barbara B. Lemon         
|                             
|/s/ Michael E. Warner        
|                             
|/s/ Abney S. Boxley, III     
|                             
|/s/ John W. Starr            
|                             
|/s/ Mason Haynesworth        
|                             
|/s/ Geoffrey Ottaway         
|                             
|/s/ A. Wayne Lewis           
|                             
|/s/ Ellis L. Gutshall        
|                             
|/s/ William D. Elliot        
|                             
|/s/ James S. Frantz, Jr.     
|                             
|/s/ Eddie F. Hearp           
|                             
|/s/ Samuel L. Lionberger, Jr.
|                             
|/s/ Ward W. Stevens
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4446 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4446

  To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on 
matters relating to the claiming and interring of unclaimed remains of 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

  Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. 
  Cartwright, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Meehan, and Mr. Cook) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on 
matters relating to the claiming and interring of unclaimed remains of 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dignified Interment of Our Veterans 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STUDY ON MATTERS RELATING TO 
              CLAIMING AND INTERRING UNCLAIMED REMAINS OF VETERANS.

    (a) Study and Report Required.--Not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall--
            (1) complete a study on matters relating to the 
        identification, claiming, and interring of unclaimed remains of 
        veterans; and
            (2) submit to Congress a report on the findings of the 
        Secretary with respect to the study required under paragraph 
        (1).
    (b) Matters Studied.--The matters studied under subsection (a)(1) 
shall include the following:
            (1) Determining the scope of issues relating to unclaimed 
        remains of veterans, including an estimate of the number of 
        unclaimed remains of veterans on the day before the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Assessing the effectiveness of the procedures of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs for claiming and interring 
        unclaimed remains of veterans.
            (3) Identifying and assessing State and local laws that 
        affect the ability of the Secretary to identify, claim, and 
        inter unclaimed remains of veterans.
            (4) Developing recommendations for such legislative or 
        administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010288EN.01000602.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Scott SA, Département du Loiret, French Republic

(Case C-290/07 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Preferential price for the purchase of developed land - Inquiry as to market value - Formal investigation procedure - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination - Scope of the Commission’s power freely to assess value - Costs method - Scope of review by the Courts)

(2010/C 288/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Flett, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: Scott SA (represented by: J. Lever QC, R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors, and by P. Gardner and G. Peretz, Barristers), Département du Loiret (represented by: A. Carnelutti, avocat), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, S. Seam and F. Million, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance delivered on 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities by which the Court annulled Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberley-Clark (OJ 2000 L 12, p. 1) in so far as it concerns aid granted in the form of a preferential land price referred to in Article 1 of the decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 Scott v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 Scott v Commission.

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union.

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000017630-NOV-201108:39 AM
Order entered July 13, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 01211 - CV ENNIS HAYWOOD, Appellant

V. JPACK INVESTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court a t Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 17 - 04786 - E



### O RDER In light of the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY appellee’s June 29, 2018 motion to dismiss as moot

. /s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
Wilma Sue CAUDILL, Employee, Plaintiff, v. HUITT MILLS, INC., Employer, Zurich American Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA 16-1281

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11339 Summary Calendar

GEORGE A. CLEVELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GILDA HARVEY; VICTOR RODRIQUEZ, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-485-Y

-------------------- February 15, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * George A. Cleveland, Texas prisoner #422864, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On appeal, Cleveland challenges the dismissal of his claims relating to his parole revocation proceeding. As Cleveland has not alleged that his revocation has been overturned, he cannot raise a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenge to the revocation proceedings. Littles v. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles Div. , 68 F.3d 122, 123 (5th Cir. 1995).No. 01-11339 -2- Cleveland contends that he has been denied parole based upon false information in his record, resulting in cruel and unusual punishment. Texas law does not create an expectation of release on parole, and Cleveland does not have a constitutional right to release. See Orellana v. Kyle , 65 F.3d 29, 32 (5th Cir. 1995); Johnson v. Rodriguez , 110 F.3d 299, 308-09 (5th Cir. 1997). Cleveland alleges that he was denied parole in retaliation for his writ-writing activities. He has failed to “allege a chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred.” Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995). His conclusional allegations of retaliation are insufficient to support relief. Baker v. Putnal , 75 F.3d 190, 195 (5th Cir. 1996). Cleveland asserts conclusionally that he was denied parole because of discriminatory motive. He has failed, however, to brief this argument, as even a pro se prisoner is required to do.
See Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995). Issues that are not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned. Brinkmann v. Dallas Co. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.3d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Cleveland also contends for the first time on appeal that he was improperly denied good-time credits upon the revocation of his parole. An issue raised for the first time on appeal is not reviewable unless it involves a purely legal issue. Diaz v. Collins , 114 F.3d 69, 71 n.5 (5th Cir. 1997). Cleveland has failed to show that the district court erred in dismissing his civil rights lawsuit. See Black v. Warren , 134No. 01-11339 -3- F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir. 1998). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
Pursuant to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Tom J. Fatjo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 /s/ Tom
      J. Fatjo, Jr.Tom
      J. Fatjo, Jr.Chief
      Executive OfficerMay
      8, 2008
 
 The
foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT TO
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED PIPELINES, TANKAGE AND LOADING RACK
THROUGHPUT AGREEMENT
(TULSA EAST)
 Amendment Effective Date Holly Tulsa HEP Tulsa HEP Storage-Tulsa Original Throughput Agreement Party Parties Holly HEP HEP Operating
 RECITALS:
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Section
2(q)
 Tank Inspection and Repairs provided however




---



##### 



Section
2(r)
 Removal of Tank from Service
 Section
2(s)
 Notice of Violation under Clean Air Act Permits Section 10 Section 2(s) Section 10
 Section
2(t)
 Tank Inspection and Maintenance Plan
 No Novation
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.]
 Amendment to First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Tulsa East)
  2




---



##### 



HEP TULSA:
HEP TULSA LLCBy:
    /s/ David G. BlairDavid G. BlairSenior Vice PresidentHEP STORAGE-TULSA:
HOLLY ENERGY STORAGE-TULSA LLCBy:
    /s/ David G. BlairDavid G. BlairPresidentHOLLY TULSA:
HOLLY REFINING & MARKETING
 TULSA LLCBy:
    /s/ David L. LampDavid L. LampPresident CONSENTED TO AND AGREED:HOLLY CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ David L. Lamp

David L. LampPresident
 Signature page to  Amendment to First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Tulsa East)




---



##### 



CONSENTED TO AND AGREED:HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.By:
    
    HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.,
its General PartnerBy:
    
    Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C.,
its General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ David G. Blair

David G. BlairPresidentHOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS-OPERATING, L.P.By:
    
    /s/ David G. Blair

David G. BlairSenior Vice President
 Signature page to  Amendment to First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Tulsa East)
In the MATTER OF Prince A. BRUMFIELD, Jr.

S18Y1167

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: June 4, 2018

Prince A. Brumfield, Jr., P.O. Box 764, Clewiston, Florida 33440, for Appellant.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel, Jenny K. Mittelman, STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*53This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Prince A. Brumfield, Jr. (State Bar No. 090667) for voluntary surrender of license, pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b). In his petition, Brumfield, who has been a member of the Bar since 1981, acknowledges that he filed a quit claim deed in the clerk's office of the superior court; that this deed purported to, but did not in fact, contain the signature of another individual; and that, at the time of this filing, Brumfield knew that this other individual had not signed the deed. Brumfield acknowledges that, by this action, he violated Rule 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d) ; the maximum sanction for a violation of this rule is disbarment. By this petition, Brumfield seeks to have this Court accept the voluntary surrender of his license, which he acknowledges is tantamount to disbarment. The Bar has responded to the petition, recommending that this Court accept Brumfield's petition.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Brumfield's petition for the voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. See generally *In the Matter of Lipman*, 293 Ga. 581, 748 S.E.2d 454 (2013). Accordingly, the name of Prince A. Brumfield, Jr. is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Brumfield is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

All the Justices concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000920941
<NAME> RED ROOF INNS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           2,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,332
<INVENTORY>                                     12,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,929
<PP&E>                                         963,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 969,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,122
<BONDS>                                        512,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   969,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               375,336
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    232
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4355 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4355

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ``Harold George Bennett 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2014

Mr. Griffin of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Womack, and Mr. 
   Cotton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ``Harold George Bennett 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harold George Bennett Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Harold 
George Bennett Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Jon SHEPHERD

No. COA17-541

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Stephen Kwame GATES

No. COA17-772

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Gregory ARMISTEAD

No. 422P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Armistead, James Gregory

Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Ms. Toni Michelle Drake Denning, Attorney at Law, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 21st of December 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4527 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To remove a use restriction on land formerly a part of 

Acadia National Park that was transferred to the town 

of Tremont, Maine, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4527 RFS

1 SECTION 1. USE RESTRICTION REMOVED. 

2 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the convey3 ance, for school purposes, of certain land in Acadia Na4 tional Park to the town of Tremont, Maine, and for other 

5 purposes’’, approved August 1, 1950, is amended by add6 ing at the end the following: ‘‘Lands conveyed to the town 

7 of Tremont, Maine, under the Act known as NPS Tract 

8 06–126, which were conveyed by the National Park Serv9 ice in deed recorded at the Hancock County Registry of 

10 Deeds Book 737 Page 467, National Park Service Deed 

11 377, shall no longer be required to be used exclusively and 

12 perpetually for school purposes and upon the discontinu13 ance of such use of said land, or any part thereof, shall 

14 no longer be required to revert to the United States.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

p0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

141060

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141060 COA: 296601 Oakland CC: 2009-225867-FH RONALD STACY WEAVER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.