alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sol Katzenstein, Respondent, *v.*Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 12, 1943.

*1014
      *Evelyn B. Richman*and *Jesse S. Richman*for appellant.

*Patrick J. McGill*for respondent.

Memorandum *Per Curiam.*

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with thirty dollars costs to the defendant and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below. The Legislature, by the enactment of section 1290 of the Penal Law (L. 1942, ch. 732), effective September 1, 1942, did not .manifest any intent to affect contracts of insurance in force before the statute took effect. Section 1293-a of the Penal Law, which deals with unauthorized use of automobiles, is not referred to in the new section 1290 of the Penal Law. By specifically mentioning the crimes defined by former section 1290 and by making the new section applicable only to crimes subsequent to the effective date, and by failing to refer to section 1293-a, or to contracts, it cannot be assumed the Legislature intended to work a change in the law laid down in *Van Vechten*v. *American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.,*239 N. *Y.*303. No opinion.

MacCrate, Smith and McCooey, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Justin Lee PERRY

No. 250P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

James R. Parish, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Justin Lee Perry, for Perry, Justin Lee.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals *569pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
57986 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

[SECRETARY’S ORDER 3–2005] 

Cancellation of Secretary’s Orders 

1. Purpose. To cancel Secretary’s 

Orders which no longer serve the needs 

of the Department of Labor. 

2. Background. Secretary’s Orders are 

periodically reviewed to determine their 

applicability within the Department. 

Those Orders which have been 

incorporated in other departmental 

directives or no longer serve 

departmental needs are canceled. 

3. The following Orders are canceled 

immediately. 

Number Subject 

24–67 ..... Department of Labor Legislative 

Committee. 

11–74 ..... Federal Advisory Council on Unemployment Insurance. 

14–77 ..... Delegations of Authority. 

8–79 ....... Law Enforcement Services at Job 

Corps Centers on Property 

Under Exclusive Federal Legislative Jurisdiction. 

7–82 ....... Department of Labor Consumer 

Affairs Program. 

Number Subject 

2–84 ....... Transfer of Responsibility for Providing Administrative Support to 

the National Commission for 

Employment Policy and National Occupational Information 

Coordinating Committee. 

4–90 ....... Delegation of Authority and Assignment of Responsibilities for 

Equal Employment Opportunity 

in Apprenticeship and Training. 

Dated: September 19, 2005. 

Elaine L. Chao, 

Secretary of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 05–19793 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
Aquis Communications Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending December
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"):

         (a)      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         This Certification is executed as of April 12, 2004.

                                                     /s/ D. Brian Plunkett
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     D. Brian Plunkett
                                                     Principal Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aquis Communications Group, Inc. and will be retained by Aquis
Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 1 2

- 7 5 0 V

(E

- Filed : J une 17, 2014 )

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

D AVID KONAR

, * UNPUBLISHED

*

*

Petitioner

, * Special Master

* Hamilton

- Fieldman

v. *

* Decision on Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diana Stadelnikas Sedar

, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Sarasota, FL, for P etitioner

. C laudia Gangi

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent

.

DECISION 1 (ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 2 the

undersigned issued a decision on M arch 25, 2014 . On J une 17, 2014 , the parties filed a

stipulation concerning attorney s’ fees and costs in this matter. Th e parties’ stipulation

requests a total payment of $ 1 5, 715.50 , representing total attorney s’ fees and costs.

1 The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States

Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002,

Pub. L . No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. §

3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within

which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade

sec ret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that

are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly

unw arranted invasion of privacy.” Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be avai lable to

the public. Id.

2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa

- 10 et seq . (2006).2

Pursuant t o General Order #9, P etitioner stated that he incurred $ 475.90 in out

- of

- pocket

costs

.

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a

reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate,

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems

reasona ble and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the amount of $ 1 5, 715.50

, in the form of a check mad e payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner ’ s counsel,

Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Esq., Mag lio, Christopher & Toale, PA. I additionally

award costs o f $475.90 , in the form of a check ma de payable to Petitioner.

In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review filed pursu ant to Appendix B of

the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment

in accordance herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED

. s/ Lisa D. Hamilton

- Fieldman

Lisa D. Hamilton

- Fieldman

Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4369 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4369

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to require payment to each county of a 
  portion of mining royalties received for mining operations in such 
                    county, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2014

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to require payment to each county of a 
  portion of mining royalties received for mining operations in such 
                    county, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Using our Energy to Build Better 
Communities Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF MINING REVENUES TO COUNTIES FOR USE FOR SCHOOLS AND 
              ROADS.

    Section 35(a) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 191(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before the first sentence;
            (2) in paragraph (1) (as designated by the amendment made 
        by paragraph (1) of this section) by striking ``40 per centum'' 
        and inserting ``20 per centum'';
            (3) by inserting after ``June 17, 1902,'' the following: 
        ``20 per centum shall be used to pay directly to each county of 
        the United States in which occurred mining operations for which 
        such money was received, other than any county in Alaska, an 
        amount that is directly proportional to the portion of such 
        money attributable to such operations,''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) Amounts paid directly to a county under paragraph (1) 
shall be used by the county for schools and roads in the county.
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to a county in 
Alaska.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) 
[5 U.S.C. 552b]

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

DATE AND TIME: 3 p.m., Thursday, October 6, 2005.

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

STATUS: Closed meeting.

MATTERS CONSIDERED: The following matters will be considered during the 
closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:
    Appeals to the Commission involving two original jursidction cases 
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

AGENCY CONTACT: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-19927 Filed 9-30-05; 10:28 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
STATE of North Carolina v. James C. HOWARD

No. 362P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Howard, James C.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*587"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
Exhibit 23.2
                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-11355 of MITY Enterprises, Inc. on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-85248 of MITY Enterprises, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated June 23, 2000 on the financial statements of DO
Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of and for the years ended March 31, 2000 and
1999, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MITY Enterprises, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 2002.

Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
Elkhart, Indiana
May 28, 2002
STATE v. Reginald Underwood FULLARD

309P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2017

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, Reginald Fullard, for Fullard, Reginald Underwood.

Karen A. Blum, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of June 2017 by Defendant for Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of June 2017."
STATE v. Daryl JONES

336A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 5, 2018

James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jones, Daryl Lamont.

Glenn G. Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Carole Biggers, Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of January 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of January 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 9th day of February 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSEFINA GOMEZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-526

)

AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 3, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; James R. Shenko, Judge.

Nancy A. Lauten and George A. Vaka of 

Vaka Law Group, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Carol M. Rooney of Butler Weihmuller Katz 

Craig LLP, Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, BLACK, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Derek
Bertocci, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: December 19, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Derek Bertocci     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Derek Bertocci         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Ms. Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Mr. Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Christina Shea Walters.

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Mr. James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Charles Becton, et al.

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Retired Members of NC Judiciary.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by Charles Becton, Charles Daye, Valerie Johnson, Irving L. Joyner, Floyd B. McKissick, Jr., Cressie H. Thigpen, Jr., and Fred J. Williams for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
**Exhibit10.1**

 

**AMENDMENTTO**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

This AMENDMENT, dated as of November 6, 2007,between GuruNet Israel Ltd., f/k/a Atomica Israel Technologies Ltd., an Israelicorporation (the “**Company**”) andRobert S. Rosenschein, an individual (“**Employee**”),amends that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement first enteredinto between the Company and Employee as of the 1st day of January,2002 and subsequently amended and restated as of January 8, 2004 (the “**Employment Agreement**”).

 

1.                                       Pursuant tothis Amendment, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

Subsection 6(d)(ii) (“**TREATMENT OF STOCK OPTIONS**”) of the Employment Agreement ishereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following

** (d)(ii) If the Company terminates the Employeewithout cause pursuant to this Section, the Board of Directors shall take thenecessary steps so that the period during which the Employee shall be permittedto exercise his options to purchase shares of common stock of the Parent inaccordance with the Parent’s employee stock option plan(s) as in effect fromtime to time (the “Options”), shall be extended to the shorter of (a) one (1)year from the effective date of his termination or (b) the expiration date ofthe options.**

2.                                       The effectivedate of this Amendment shall be the date first written above.

3.                                       Terms used inthis Amendment but not defined herein will have the respective meaningsascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.  In the event of any conflict between theterms of this Amendment and the terms of the Employment Agreement, thisAmendment shall control.  Except asmodified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full forceand effect.

 
| **AGREED AND ACCEPTED:**   | ** **                     | **AGREED AND ACCEPTED:**           |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| ** **                 | ** **                     | ** **                         |
| **Robert S.  Rosenschein** | ** **                     | **GuruNet  Israel Ltd.**           |
| ** **                 | ** **                     | ** **                         |
| **Signature:**             | **/s/** Robert S.  Rosenschein | ** **                         | **Signature:** | **/s/** Steven  Steinberg |
| ** **                 | ** **                     | ** **                         | ** ** | ** ** |
| ** **                 | ** **                     | **Name: Steven Steinberg**         |
| ** **                 | ** **                     | ** **                         |
| ** **                 | ** **                     | **Title: Chief Financial Officer** |

** **

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 792-793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-196]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Cancellation of Textile Visa Requirements for Laos

December 30, 2004.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).

[[Page 793]]


ACTION: Issuing a directive to the Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection canceling all previous directives concerning visa 
requirements for Laos.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip J. Martello, Director, Trade 
and Data Division, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, (202) 482-3400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as amended; 
Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
1854).
    Due to the expiration on December 31, 2004 of the bilateral textile 
agreement with Laos, the United States is cancelling visa requirements 
for textile products from Laos exported after that date.
    In the letter below, CITA is directing the Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection to cancel all textile visa requirements for goods 
exported from Laos on and after January 1, 2005.

D. Michael Hutchinson,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile 
Agreements.

Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements

December 30, 2004.

Commissioner,
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Washington, D.C. 20229.
    Dear Commissioner: This directive cancels all previous 
directives issued to you by the Chairman, Committee for the 
Implementation of Textile Agreements concerning textile visa 
requirements for goods produced or manufactured in Laos. Effective 
for such goods exported from Laos on and after January 1, 2005, you 
are directed not to require a textile visa for entry into the 
Customs territory of the United Sates.
    The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreement has 
determined that this action falls within the foreign affairs 
exception to the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
    Sincerely,
D. Michael Hutchinson,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile 
Agreements.
[FR Doc. 05-196 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**EX. REL. ANTONIO BUNDY,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF**
**PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 128 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED

**, and the “Action in Mandamus” is**  DENIED

**.**
STATE of North Carolina v. Jacquez MCKOY

No. COA17-107

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.