alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3439

_____________________________
K

AREEM G RADY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duv al County

. James H. Daniel , Judge

. April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRM ED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and L EWIS and M AKAR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9 .331

.

_____________________________ Kareem Grady, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 64 DB 2023 (No. 44 RST 2023)

:

HAPPY MELISSA DICENSO : Attorney Registration No. 83532

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 13, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

HAPPY MELISSA DICENSO, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has 

demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law 

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby 

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses 

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by 

the Petitioner.
STATE v. Eugene MATTHEWS

28P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Eugene Matthews, For Matthews, Eugene.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2018 by Defendant to Demand Lower Appellate Court to Send Copy of Motion:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Mr. Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Durham, For Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Mr. Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, For Golphin, Tilmon Charles

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

*597Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, For N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by NC Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).

Beasley, J., recused
#### Melvin Leroy TYLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 81129.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 27, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 26, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

Melvin Leroy Tyler, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Anne E. Edgington, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Leroy Tyler (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Motion to Vacate Judgment, Reinstate the Case and Appoint Counsel to Amend Motion for Hearing pursuant to Rule 27.26, predecessor of Rule 29.15. Movant contends his motion was a motion to reinstate a Rule 27.26 motion on the grounds that appointed counsel failed to file an amended motion. Movant argues he suffered abandonment because counsel did not file an amended motion and that he is entitled to a hearing on the matter.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance "with Rule 84.16(b).
#### WONTORSKI, John R., et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAMSBURG MOBILE HOMES, INC., Appellee.

No. 56S04-0303-CV-111.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

July 9, 2003.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

In this case, the Court of Appeals held that a contractual forum-selection clause established preferred venue and that an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien need not be brought in the county in which the real estate is located,. See Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 775 N.E.2d 691 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). This Court granted Appellants' petition to transfer by order dated March 14, 2008. Thus, the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case has been vacated and shall be held for naught. See Appellate Rule 58(A). By "Notice of Settlement" filed June 30, 2003, the parties have notified the Court that they have settled this matter.

Being duly advised, the Court now DISMISSES this appeal as moot.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record and to the Attorney General of Indiana.

All Justices concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57924-57925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: VictoRe Insurance 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 3 too the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005, at 70 FR 38502.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-7102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued to the following Company under 
31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate 
their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2005 Revision, on 
page 38544 to reflect this addition:
    VictoRe Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i>28517). Business address: 
4334 NW. Expressway, Suite 151, Oklahoma City, OK 73116-1574. Phone: 
(405) 767-1151. Underwriting limitation b/: $160,000. Surety licenses 
c/: OK, TX. Incorporated in: Oklahoma.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard copy may be purchased from the 
Government Printing Office (GPO) Subscription Service, Washington, DC, 
Telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the 
following stock number: 769-004-052-19-0.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and

[[Page 57925]]

Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 23, 2005.
Teresa G. Casswell,
Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19797 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 30 January 2006         

amending Decision 2005/731/EC laying down additional requirements for the surveillance of avian influenza in wild birds

(notified under document number C(2006) 135)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/52/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 4 of Decision 2005/731/EC, the date ‘31 January 2006’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2006’.

Article 2

Member States shall amend their legislation to bring it into compliance with this Decision and give immediate appropriate publicity to the measures adopted. They shall immediately inform the Commission of those measures.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14).

(2)OJ L 167, 22.6.1992, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 274, 20.10.2005, p. 95.

(4)OJ L 274, 20.10.2005, p. 93.

----
STATE of North Carolina v. David PAIGE

No. COA17-102

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41487 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ANTONIO RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-409-1

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Ramirez moves for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has filed a response. In his response, Ramirez raises the following issues: 1) the indictment is insufficient because it failed to charge every element of the 8 U.S.C. § 1326 offense; 2) the indictment is insufficient because it fails to allege Ramirez’s prior felony conviction; 3) Ramirez was not provided access to his country’sNo. 00-41487 -2- consul pursuant to the Vienna Convention; 4) Ramirez did not receive an adjustment to his sentence for his acceptance of responsibility; and 5) the court erred by not departing downward from the guideline range. Our independent review of the appellate record and of the possible issues raised by counsel and by Ramirez reveals no nonfrivolous issue. The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Wayne BURNETTE

No. COA17-847

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 19, 2018

NO ERROR.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BLACK POINT ASSETS, LLC, as trustee )

under the 1124 Rushmore Avenue South )

Land Trust dated March 1, 2015, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4493

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as trustee )

for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through )

Certificates, Series 2005-PR4 Trust; B&B )

B&B FUNDING, LLC; KIM MITCHELL a/k/a )

KIM M. DELPINO a/k/a KIM D. MITCHELL; )

UNKNOWN TENANT(S) n/k/a BRIAN )

WILSON; )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; John Duryea, Judge.

Mark P. Stopa of the Stopa Law Firm, 

Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Richard J.

Mockler of Stay In My Home, P.A., Saint 

Petersburg (withdrew after briefing);

Latasha Scott of Lord Scott PLLC, Tampa 

(withdrew after briefing); and Ian P. Hudson 

of King Hudson│PLLC, Saint Petersburg, 

for Appellant.

W. Aaron Daniel, Elliot B. Kula, and William 

D. Mueller of Kula & Associates, P.A., 

Miami, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Chun K. Hong, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Netlist, Inc.; and

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: July 7, 2011

 

 
| /s/   Chun K. Hong                                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Chun   K. Hong                                                 |   |
| President,   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |   |

 

----
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Terry R. FISHER, Respondent.

No. 848 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 11, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2003, there having been filed with this Court by Terry R. Fisher his verified Statement of Resignation dated April 14, 2003, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Terry R. Fisher be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further OR*665DERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
#### In the Matter of Daniel A. GRIFFITH.

No. 702 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 19, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2003, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 28, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that DANIEL A. GRIFFITH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136180 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136180 

 COA: 277042 

Calhoun CC: 2006-003491-FC 

JAMES ELLIS SPARKS, a/k/a KHALID

RASHAD, a/k/a RASHAD KHALID, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427  I, Haley Manchester, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Trai Thien USA Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  c) disclosed in this report any change in registrant's internal control over financial reporting the occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting,    Dated: August 31, 2010/s/ Haley ManchesterHaley Manchester
Chief Executive Officer
#### Ex parte A.K. and Thomas B. Woodall, as guardian ad litem for the minor children, S.T.J., B.J., and M.J. and Ex parte S.J. (In re State Department of Human Resources v. A.K. and S.J. (In the matter of S.T.J., B.J., and M.J.)).

1011789 and 1011790.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 2002.

*24Christopher F. Abel of Gullahorn *&*Hare, P.C., Albertville, for petitioner A.K.

Richard L. Fricks, Boaz, for petitioner S.J.

Thomas B. Woodall of Barnett, Woodall & Baker, Guntersville, guardian ad litem.

William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen.; J. Coleman Campbell, deputy atty. gen.; and Sharon E. Ficquette, asst. atty. gen., Department of Human Resources, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

1011789-WRIT DENIED.

1011790-WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, JOHNSTONE, and HARWOOD, JJ., dissent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari review. I agree with Judge Crawley’s dissent from the opinion issued by the Court of Civil Appeals in this case. *State Department of Human Res. v. A.K.,*851 So.2d 1, 9 (Ala.Civ.App.2002) (Crawley, J., dissenting).
SWAN BEACH COROLLA, L.L.C., Ocean Associates, LP, Little Neck Towers, L.L.C., Gerald Friedman, Nancy Friedman, Charles S. Friedman, 'Til Morning, LLC, and Second Star, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF CURRITUCK; The Currituck County Board of Commissioners; and John D. Rorer, Marion Gilbert, O. Vance Aydlett, Jr., H.M. Petrey, J. Owen Etheridge, Paul Martin, and S. Paul O'Neal as members of the Currituck County Board of Commissioners, Defendants.

No. COA17-411

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

DISMISSED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Layla ROBERTS.

No. 2002-KP-2784.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Roberts, Layla; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 179,481; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36914-KW.

Denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 450 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to bring the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection into the regular appropriations 

process, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2013 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to bring the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

into the regular appropriations process, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection Accountability Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 450 IH

1 SEC. 2. BRINGING THE BUREAU INTO THE REGULAR AP2 PROPRIATIONS PROCESS. 

3 Section 1017 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

4 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5497) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) by amending the heading of such sub7 section to read as follows: ‘‘BUDGET, FINAN8 CIAL MANAGEMENT, AND AUDIT.—’’; 

9 (B) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

10 (3); 

11 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

12 (5) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 

13 (D) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated— 

14 (i) by striking subparagraph (E); and 

15 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

16 (F) as subparagraph (E); 

17 (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c); 

18 (3) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 

19 subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

20 (4) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 

21 (A) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

22 (3) and inserting the following: 

23 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

24 There is authorized to be appropriated such funds as 

25 may be necessary to carry out this title for fiscal 

26 year 2013.’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 450 IH

1 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

2 paragraph (2). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS