alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 26, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01292-CV 

JOSE F. RUIZ, Appellant 

V. 

BLANCA SANDOVAL, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-13223 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Stoddart 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated November 9, 2017, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We 

directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that 

failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated November 9, 

2017, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal 

of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated January 11, 2018, we informed appellant 

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We 

directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without 
 –2– 

payment of costs within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in 

the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, 

provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the 

status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

171292F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JOSE F. RUIZ, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01292-CV V. 

BLANCA SANDOVAL, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-13223. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Brown and Stoddart participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee BLANCA SANDOVAL recover her costs of this appeal 

from appellant JOSE F. RUIZ. 

Judgment entered January 26, 2018.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Joel TORRES-GONZALEZ

No. 325P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Lars F. Nance, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Ms. Valerie L. Bateman, OSHR General Counsel, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. J. Darren Byers, Attorney at Law, For Torres-Gonzalez, Jose Joel.

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, For the State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at December  31, 1996 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000921178
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              15,490
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                           345
<INVENTORY>                                          1,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,584
<PP&E>                                             201,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                      28,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     223,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,892
<BONDS>                                            181,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               16,430
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                29
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       223,718
<SALES>                                            161,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   174,234
<CGS>                                               65,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       65,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       194
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                            69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .15



</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Mark Trimble v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 911

- CV

Trial court case number: CV

- 0081892

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County

Appellant Mark Trimble ’ s motion for rehearing is denied

.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Gordon Goodman

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.

Date: August 22, 201 9
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

AN ACT 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract 

Extension Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior 

to extend the contract for certain water services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4508 EH

1 SECTION 1. EAST BENCH IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT 

2 EXTENSION. 

3 Section 2(1) of the East Bench Irrigation District 

4 Water Contract Extension Act (Public Law 112–139; 126 

5 Stat. 390) is amended by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘10 years’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

AN ACT 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water 

water services. of the Interior to extend the contract for certain Contract Extension Act to permit the Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary
Y. Kusumi, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge,
that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: May 16, 2011

/s/ Gary Y. KusumiGary Y. Kusumi Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



33
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4531 

To prohibit the provision of performance awards to employees of the Internal 

Revenue Service who owe back taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. PAULSEN, 

Mr. TIBERI, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. GERLACH, Mrs. 

BLACK, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. ROSKAM, and Mr. RENACCI) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of performance awards to employees 

of the Internal Revenue Service who owe back taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Bonuses for Tax 

5 Delinquent IRS Employees Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4531 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PERFORMANCE AWARDS TO IRS 

2 EMPLOYEES WHO OWE BACK TAXES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of the Internal 

4 Revenue Service shall not provide any performance award 

5 (including, but not limited to, bonuses, step increases, and 

6 time off) to an employee of the Internal Revenue Service 

7 who owes an outstanding Federal tax debt. 

8 (b) OUTSTANDING FEDERAL TAX DEBT.—For pur9 poses of this section, the term ‘‘outstanding Federal tax 

10 debt’’ means any outstanding debt under the Internal Rev11 enue Code of 1986 which has not been paid after an as12 sessment of a tax, penalty, or interest and which is not 

13 subject to further appeal or a petition for redetermination 

14 under such Code. A debt shall not fail to be treated as 

15 an outstanding Federal tax debt merely because it is the 

16 subject of an installment agreement under section 6159 

17 of such Code or an offer-in-compromise under section 

18 7121 of such Code. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chad DeGroot,
President, Secretary and Treasurer of Metasun Enterprises, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metasun Enterprises, Inc. for the three
          months period ended July 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Metasun           Enterprises, Inc..
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 17, 2004

/s/ Chad DeGrootChad DeGrootPresident, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Metasun
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Metasun Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BROWN v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, et al.

429P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Richard B. Harper, Attorney at Law, Sylva, for Brown, Jacquelyn.

Donna B. Wojcik, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Public Instruction (Macon County Schools), et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2017 by Defendant to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00473
- CV

E. J., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 428TH DISTR ICT COURT OF HAYS CO UNTY NO. 17
- 1409, THE HON ORABLE MELISSA MCCLE NAHAN, JUD GE PRESIDING

O R D E R
PER CURIAM Appellant E. J. filed her notice of appeal on July 16, 2018 . The appellate record was complete July 24, 2018 , and a ppellant’s brief was due August 16, 2018

. To date, appellant’s
brief has not been filed. The rules of j udicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days
f

or court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with brie fing deadlines. Therefore, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than August 30, 2018 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on Augu st 20, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4453 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4453

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    reduced recognition period for built-in gains of S corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

Mr. Reichert (for himself and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    reduced recognition period for built-in gains of S corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCED RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN GAINS OF S 
              CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (7) of section 1374(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(7) Recognition period.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `recognition period' 
                means the 5-year period beginning with the 1st day of 
                the 1st taxable year for which the corporation was an S 
                corporation. For purposes of applying this section to 
                any amount includible in income by reason of 
                distributions to shareholders pursuant to section 
                593(e), the preceding sentence shall be applied without 
                regard to the phrase `5-year'.
                    ``(B) Installment sales.--If an S corporation sells 
                an asset and reports the income from the sale using the 
                installment method under section 453, the treatment of 
                all payments received shall be governed by the 
                provisions of this paragraph applicable to the taxable 
                year in which such sale was made.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jack D. Massimino                                                     
|Jack D. Massimino President and Chief Executive
Officer September 13, 2005
# Official Journal L 280/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 280 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6028 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 280

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6028 October 2017

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2017 concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2017 concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products ( OJ L 167, 27.6.2012 ) | 57 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products ( OJ L 167, 27.6.2012 )

( OJ L 167, 27.6.2012 )

57

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 111/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 111 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 638 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 111

English edition

Legislation

Volume 638 April 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/494 of 24 March 2020 adopting the thirteenth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (notified under document C(2020) 1713) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/495 of 24 March 2020 adopting the thirteenth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (notified under document C(2020) 1811) | 176 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/494 of 24 March 2020 adopting the thirteenth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (notified under document C(2020) 1713)

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/495 of 24 March 2020 adopting the thirteenth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (notified under document C(2020) 1811)

176

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4443 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4443

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, as the ``Corporal Juan 
                Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2014

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, as the ``Corporal Juan 
                Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUAN MARIEL ALCANTARA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```