alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas King, Chief Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             



| | By:    | /s/ Douglas King       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | DOUGLAS KING           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | February 14, 2007      



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Frederick Lwee, Principal Financial Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: NOVEMBER 12, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ FREDERICK LWEE         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | FREDERICK LWEE             
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4417 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resources study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of entering into public-private 

partnerships to operate federally owned golf courses in the District of 

Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2014 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resources study to determine the suitability and feasibility of entering into public-private partnerships to operate federally owned golf courses in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY AND REPORT. 

4 (a) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—The Sec5 retary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the 

6 National Park Service, shall conduct a special resources 

7 study to determine the suitability and feasibility of enterVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:03 Apr 08, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4417.IH H4417

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4417 IH

1 ing into public-private partnerships with non-Federal enti2 ties to operate East Potomac Golf Course, Langston Golf 

3 Course, and Rock Creek Park Golf Course, located in the 

4 District of Columbia. The Secretary shall conduct the 

5 study in accordance with section 8(c) of Public Law 91– 

6 383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)). 

7 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study pur8 suant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall assume that— 

9 (1) one of the three golf courses will be a world10 class, tournament-quality public course, with playing 

11 fees commensurate with such courses; 

12 (2) the other two golf courses shall be public 

13 courses of substantially similar quality to top-ranked 

14 courses owned by cities, towns, counties, and States; 

15 and 

16 (3) the playing fees for the two courses referred 

17 to in paragraph (2) shall remain the same as they 

18 are on the date of the enactment of this Act, but 

19 shall be indexed annually to the Consumer Price 

20 Index as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statis21 tics. 

22 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

23 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

24 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

25 Resources of the House of Representatives and the ComVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:03 Apr 08, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4417.IH H4417

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4417 IH

1 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

2 a report containing— 

3 (1) the results of the study, including a deter4 mination of which golf course would be best suitable 

5 as the world-class, tournament-quality public course 

6 referred to in subsection (b)(1); and 

7 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Randy DRENNAN and Patricia Ferguson, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. FARMERS BANK, INC., Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 80850.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 18, 2003.

Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 3, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26,2003.

Randy Drennen, Patricia Ferguson, Imperial, pro se.

Albert W. Dieffenbach Jr., Nicole Harris, Wegmann, Gasaway, Stewart, I Dief-fenbach Law Firm, Hillsboro, for respondent.

Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Ferguson (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted in her first amended petition, as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err nor abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4355 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Harold George Bennett 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2014 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. WOMACK, and 

Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the 

‘‘Harold George Bennett Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold 

7 George Bennett Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4355 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harold George Ben3 nett Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4334 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4334

 To allow homeowners facing foreclosure to avoid deficiency judgments, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2014

     Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico (for herself and Mr. 
 Cartwright) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow homeowners facing foreclosure to avoid deficiency judgments, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Fairness Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DEFICIENCY JUDGMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, in 
the case of any federally related mortgage loan made after that date, a 
court may not enter deficiency judgment pertaining to that loan after 
the date of any foreclosure sale of the mortgaged property.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to preempt any more restrictive State or local law pertaining to 
deficiency judgments.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Deficiency judgment.--The term ``deficiency judgment'' 
        means any order by a court entered after a sale of a property 
        subject to a federally related mortgage that has been 
        foreclosed on, requiring the payment by the mortgagor of an 
        amount equal to any balance remaining on the mortgage loan 
        after the foreclosure sale.
            (2) Federally related mortgage loan.--The term ``federally 
        related mortgage loan'' has the meaning given such term under 
        section 3 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 
        (12 U.S.C. 2602).
            (3) Mortgaged property.--The term ``mortgaged property'' 
        means, with respect to a federally related mortgage loan, the 
        residential real property that is subject to the lien securing 
        such mortgage loan.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Matthew Scott KRAUSE

348P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Matthew Scott Krause, for Krause, Matthew Scott.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of October 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of DSA Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Edward L. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


                                       /s/ Edward L. Fischer
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Edward L. Fischer
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 10, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Tidwell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: June 27, 2011  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Terril Courtney BATTLE

No. COA16-355-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 16, 2018

Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Anne Goco Kirby, for the State.

Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding, by Assistant Appellate Defender Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, for defendant-appellant.

ARROWOOD, Judge.

This case comes before us on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court to reconsider our decision in light of its holding in *State v. Brice* , --- N.C. ----, --- S.E.2d ---- (3 November 2017), which reversed this Court's decision in *State v. Brice,* --- N.C. App. ----, 786 S.E.2d 812 (2016). In this Court's previous decision, we stated "[w]e hold that the circumstances of defendant's case are identical to those found in *Brice* ." *Battle* , --- N.C. App. at ----, --- S.E.2d at ----. Given this determination, and in reliance on the Court's previous holding in *Brice* , we vacated defendant's conviction for habitual misdemeanor assault and remanded for entry of judgment and sentence for simple assault. *Id* . at ----, --- S.E.2d at ----.

In its 3 November 2017 opinion in *Brice* , the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals opinion in *Brice* and reinstated the defendant's previous judgment for felonious habitual misdemeanor larceny. Upon reconsideration in light of this holding, we reverse our 16 December 2016 holding in the instant case with respect to misdemeanor assault and find no error in the trial court's previous judgment.

NO ERROR

Report per Rule 30(e).

Judges HUNTER, JR. and DIETZ concur.
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

July 30, 2015

No. 10-13-00466-CR

ANTHONY LYNN THIBODEAUX

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-154-CR

**JUDGMENT**

	This Court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record in this proceeding as relevant to the issues raised and finds no reversible error is presented.  Accordingly the trial court’s judgment, signed on December 20, 2013, is affirmed.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Globetel  Communications  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas Y. Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Thomas Y. Jimenez
                                         -------------------------
                                         Thomas Y, Jimenez
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         March 31, 2006
STATE of North Carolina, v. Johnathan Shelton ALLEN, Defendant.

No. COA16-1147

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                       ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned certifies that she is an Assistant Vice President of GreenPoint
Credit LLC (the "Servicer") and that, as such, she is duly authorized to execute
and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Servicer pursuant to Section 4.20
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December
1, 1999 between GreenPoint, Credit, LLC., as Seller and Servicer, and Bank One,
National Association, as Trustee, (all capitalized terms used herein without
definition having the respective meanings specified in the Agreement) and
further certifies that:


1.   I have reviewed the activities for the one year period ending December 31,
     1999 and performance under this agreement has been made under such
     officer's supervision under Section 4.20 of the Agreement; and

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
     fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto my signature this 29th day of
February, 2000.



                                        GREENPOINT CREDIT, LLC

                                        By /s/ Mary Churley
                                           ----------------
                                           Mary Churley
                                           Assistant Vice President and Manager
                                           Investor Servicing
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1834EM

_____________

John W. C. Moll, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

City of Arnold, a third class city in the *

State of Missouri; Alfred M. Ems, *

individually, and as former Mayor of the * Appeal from the United States

City of Arnold; Billie Jo Nelson, * District Court for the Eastern

individually, and as the Chief of Police * District of Missouri.

of the City of Arnold; Eric Knoll, *

individually, and as the City * [UNPUBLISHED]

Administrator for the City of Arnold; *

Arnold City Council, consisting of: *

Robert D. Lindsley, Michael W. Wright, *

Lavaughn King, Phillis Roberts, Vernon *

L. Sullivan, Ronald Voss, Glennon J. *

Portell, Trudy Marshall; Marion Becker, *

City Clerk for the City of Arnold, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: November 21, 1997

Filed: November 26, 1997

_____________
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District *

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

-2-

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge. *

_____________

PER CURIAM.

John W. C. Moll appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Moll's

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties'

submissions, we conclude the magistrate judge's decision was correct and an extended

discussion on our part is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Todd E. Simpson, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|March 26, 2002 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/  Todd E. Simpson                                                                        
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date           |  |  |  |  |  | Todd E. Simpson                                                                             
|               |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
SOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. DALAMAGAS, et al.

308A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 26, 2017

Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Robert J. King, III, Attorney at Law, Jonathan M. Shapiro, Attorney at Law, for Soma Technology, Inc.

Sam McGee, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Desai, Hiren.

Paul J. Stevens, Attorney at Law, for Dalamagas, Photios, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 25th of September 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of September 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 15th day of November 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.