alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Philip J. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)

          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2)

          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Date: May 23, 2014 /s/ Philip J. YoungPhilip J. Young President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40001

Conference Calendar

CHARLES WESTERBY

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General; WARDEN SMITH, Mark Stiles Unit;

UNIDENTIFIED PITTMAN, Captain; STACY DAVIS; JACK BIVEN, Unknown

Inmate

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CV-248

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Westerby, Texas prisoner # 579967, appeals the 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district

court held that Westerby’s complaint was barred by the limitations period.

Westerby has failed to brief the limitations issue on appeal, and, therefore, its

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40001

2

review is waived. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Westerby’s motion to remand the case is denied.

Westerby’s appeal is without arguable merit and is, thus, frivolous. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, it is

dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of his complaint

and this court’s dismissal of his appeal both count as strikes for purposes of

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996).

Westerby is warned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will no longer be

allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he

is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION

DENIED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136842 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136842 

 COA: 264175 

Oakland CC: 2004-197438-FC 

JOSEPH WELLS STAPLETON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the“Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |        |  |                                  
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------
|                   |  |        |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Curtis W. Mewbourne              
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                   |  |        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4521 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4521

 To modify exemptions for small creditors and mortgage loan servicers, 
  to require a study of appropriate capital requirements for mortgage 
 servicing assets for nonsystemic banking institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2014

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify exemptions for small creditors and mortgage loan servicers, 
  to require a study of appropriate capital requirements for mortgage 
 servicing assets for nonsystemic banking institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Institution Mortgage 
Relief Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM ESCROW REQUIREMENTS FOR LOANS HELD BY SMALL 
              CREDITORS.

    Section 129D(c) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639d(c)), 
as added by section 1461(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) as 
        subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) and moving such 
        subparagraphs 2 ems to the right;
            (2) by striking ``The Board'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Board''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) Treatment of Loans Held by Smaller Creditors.--The Board 
shall, by regulation, exempt from the requirements of subsection (a) 
any loan secured by a first lien on a consumer's principle dwelling, if 
such loan is held by a creditor with assets of $10,000,000,000 or 
less.''.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO EXEMPTION FOR SMALL SERVICERS OF MORTGAGE 
              LOANS.

    Section 6 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 
U.S.C. 2605) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Small Servicer Exemption.--The Bureau shall, by regulation, 
provide exemptions to, or adjustments for, the provisions of this 
section for servicers that annually service 20,000 or fewer mortgage 
loans, in order to reduce regulatory burdens while appropriately 
balancing consumer protections.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Conquest Cleaning Corp., Respondent, v New York City School Construction Authority, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 689]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beldock, J.H.O.), dated May 20, 1999, which, upon a decision of the same court dated March 31, 1999, made after a hearing, estopped the defendant from asserting that the plaintiff failed to timely file a notice of claim.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the order dated March 31, 1999, is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see,*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

Generally, the doctrine of estoppel is not applicable to municipalities acting in a governmental capacity *(see, Matter of Hamptons Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Moore,*52 NY2d 88, 93, n 1). However, a municipality may be estopped from asserting that *547a claim was untimely filed when its improper conduct induced reliance by a party who changed his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice *(see, Bender v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*38 NY2d 662, 668). Here, in the three-month period during which the notice of claim should have been filed, the defendant’s project manager provided Jorge Martinez, the plaintiffs president, with payment forms, advised Martinez on how to complete the forms, advised Martinez that the defendant had approved the submitted payment forms, made various requests for copies of additional documentation, and assured Martinez that the payment request had been sent to the defendant. The defendant did not inform Martinez that the payment request had been or would be rejected. Rather, Bernard Orlan, the defendant’s manager of industrial hygiene, set up a payment meeting with Martinez, directed Martinez to bring additional copies of the payment request documentation, and told Martinez that his payment request would be considered fairly.

Under these circumstances, the hearing court properly concluded that the conduct of the defendant lulled the plaintiff into sleeping on its rights to its detriment and therefore applied the doctrine of estoppel *(see, Boeckmann & Assocs. v Board of Educ.,*207 AD2d 773; *Welsh v Gindele & Johnson,*50 AD2d 971; *see also, Town of Smithtown v Jet Paper Stock Corp.,*179 AD2d 634). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Michael J. McClure, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my
knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: August 16, 2010



/s/ Michael J. McClureMichael J. McClureExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 470/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 470 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6430 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 470

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6430 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 161 – Uniform provisions concerning the protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use and the approval of the device against unauthorized use (by mean of a locking system) [2021/2274] | 1 |
| | * | UN Regulation No 162 – Uniform technical prescriptions concerning approval of immobilizers and approval of a vehicle with regard to its immobilizer [2021/2275] | 23 |
| | * | UN Regulation No 163 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicle alarm system and approval of a vehicle with regard to its vehicle alarm system [2021/2276] | 48 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 161 – Uniform provisions concerning the protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use and the approval of the device against unauthorized use (by mean of a locking system) [2021/2274]

1

*

UN Regulation No 162 – Uniform technical prescriptions concerning approval of immobilizers and approval of a vehicle with regard to its immobilizer [2021/2275]

23

*

UN Regulation No 163 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicle alarm system and approval of a vehicle with regard to its vehicle alarm system [2021/2276]

48

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00788

- CV

DONALD GAUCI , Appellant

V.

KATHRYN WOESSNER G AUCI , Appellee
Appeal from the Probate Court No 2 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 430,385 ).

This case is an appeal from the orde r signed by the trial court on June 24, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the proposed ward. Accordingly, the C ourt vacates the trial court’s order and dismisses the

case.

The Court orders that the appellee, Kathryn Woessner Gauci, pay all appellate

costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered August 4 , 2015

.

Pan el consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Massengale.
Roy A. COOPER, III, in his capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Philip E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives

No. 409PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, D. Martin Warf, Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorneys at Law, Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 1st of December 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to *585the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Retained by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of December 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**Exhibit 8.01**

**List of Subsidiaries**

Telemar Norte Leste Participações S.A. (TMAR) 

TNL PCS S.A. (Oi) 

Telemar Internet Ltda. (Telemar Internet) 

Companhia AIX de Participações S.A. (AIX) 

PaggoEmpreendimentos S.A. (Paggo) 

WAY TV Belo Horizonte S.A. (Way TV) 

Serviços de Rede S.A. (SEREDE) 

Amazônia Celular S.A. (Amazônia Celular) 

All subsidiaries are organized and incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4295 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4295

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 collect and maintain data on the number of sexual assaults that occur 
  on aircraft during flights in passenger air transportation, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2014

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 collect and maintain data on the number of sexual assaults that occur 
  on aircraft during flights in passenger air transportation, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Airline Passengers from 
Sexual Assaults Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. SEXUAL ASSAULT DATA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
shall establish a program to collect and maintain data on the number of 
sexual assaults that occur on aircraft during flights in passenger air 
transportation.
    (b) Data Availability.--The Administrator shall make available to 
the public on the primary Internet Web site of the Federal Aviation 
Administration the data maintained under subsection (a).
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Air transportation.--The term ``air transportation'' 
        has the meaning given that term in section 40102(a)(5) of title 
        49, United States Code, and includes intrastate air 
        transportation.
            (2) Aircraft.--The term ``aircraft'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 40102(a)(6) of title 49, United States 
        Code.
            (3) Intrastate air transportation.--The term ``intrastate 
        air transportation'' has the meaning given that term in section 
        40102(a)(27) of title 49, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
AZURE DOLPHIN, LLC, et al. v. BARTON, et al.

128A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 18, 2018

Peter J. Juran, Attorney at Law, M. Rachael Dimont, Attorney at Law, Chad Archer, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Azure Dolphin, LLC, et al.

Alan M. Ruley, Attorney at Law, Andrew A. Freeman, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Barton, Justin, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of May 2018 by Plaintiffs:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of May 2018."

Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 15th day of June 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.