alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 105 SSM 11 The People &c., Appellant, v. Ganesh R. Ramsaran, Respondent.

Submitted by Michael J. Genute, for appellant. Submitted by Cheryl F. Coleman, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to the Appellate Division for consideration of issues raised, but not determined, on the appeal to that court. The People's forensic expert gave statistical testimony
- 1 -- 2 - SSM 11

regarding the likelihood ("1.661 quadrillion times more likely") that defendant and his deceased wife, rather than two randomly selected individuals, were contributors to a DNA mixture profile drawn from a blood stain on defendant's sweatshirt. The prosecutor, during his summation, summarized this testimony by telling the jury that the victim's DNA was "on" defendant's sweatshirt. Defense counsel's failure to object to this characterization did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. The expert testimony regarding the "likelihood ratio" here contrasts with the testimony at issue in People v Wright (25 NY3d 769 [2015]), which "only indicated that defendant could not be excluded from the pool of male DNA contributors, and . . . provided no statistical comparison to measure the significance of those results" (Wright, 25 NY3d at 771). Nor did counsel's other alleged errors of representation, either individually or collectively, deprive defendant of meaningful representation. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on appeal to that court, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.
Decided June 29, 2017

- 2 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-030-1310-DB] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) inadvertently published a draft version of a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Creston/Blue Gap II Natural Gas Project, Carbon and Sweetwater Counties, Wyoming in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, September 8, 2005 (70 FR 53381). The BLM is publishing this correction notice to strike the last sentence. The sentence being removed is “A decision for the Creston/Blue Gap II Natural Gas Project (C/BG2 Project) will not be made nor implemented until after a Record of Decision is issued for the Rawlins RMP revision FEIS”. Any such decision will be in accordance with regulatory requirements.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bureau of Land Management, Eldon Allison, Project Manager, 1300 North Third Street, P.O. Box 2407, Rawlins, Wyoming 82301. Mr. Allison may also be reached by telephone at (307) 328-4291, or by sending an electronic message to:                         *Eldon_Allison@blm.gov*.                     

Deborah Rawhouser, 

Group Manager, Planning Assessment and Community Support. 

[FR Doc. 05-20084 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
The State



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 30, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00303

- CR

Santos GUEVARA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5336 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The record in this appeal was due May 12, 2014, but has not been filed. The court

reporter filed a notification of late record stating the record was not filed because appellant

Santos Guevara Jr. had neither requested nor paid for the record. In response, appellant’s attorney has filed a motion for a free appellate record. The motion is supported by the affidavit

o f appellant’ s wife and states that it was served on both the trial court clerk and the court

reporter.

Rule 20.2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a motion for a free appellate record in a criminal appeal be filed “[w]ithin the time for perfecting the appeal. ” This time has passed. Nevertheless, in the interest of just ice and to expedite a decision in the case, we apply

Rule 2 of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure to allow the late motion and affidavit of indigence. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2; Turner v. State , 71 S.W.3d 928 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, no pet.).

We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. We order the trial court to hold a hearing on or before June 20, 2014, to determine whether appellant is able to pay for the appellate record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.2. The trial court must allow appellant to pre sent evidence, telephonically or otherwise, to sustain his assertion of indigence. The court must further g ive notice of the date and time of the hearing to the trial court clerk

, court reporter , and

the State

.

If the trial court finds Guevara is indigent, the trial court is ordered to direct the Gillespie County District Clerk and the court reporter to prepare the appellate record without charge toappellant and to file the record within t hirty days of the date of the hearing. The trial court may also, if requested, appoint appellate counsel.

We further order the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issue of Guevara’s indigence, to direct the clerk to file them in this court

, and t o direct the court

reporter to prepare a nd file a record of the indigence hearing . The findings and conclusions and record of the hearing are due in this court within five days of the hearing.

We o rder the clerk of this court to send cop ies of this order , to the trial court, the clerk, and court reporter.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN RE: R.D.H., III, Minor Juvenile.

No. COA17-383

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

REVERSED. REMANDED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dontay Jacques WILDS

No. COA17-1048

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

30 CFR Parts 250 and 282

RIN 1010-AC47

Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental 
Shelf--Plans and Information

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: MMS is delaying until January 1, 2006, the effective date of a 
rule that regulates plans and information that lessees and operators 
must submit in connection with oil and gas exploration, development and 
production on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This delay is 
necessary because of damage in the New Orleans area caused by Hurricane 
Katrina and subsequent flooding. This temporary delay will provide 
relief to the government and the oil and gas industry as they recover 
from this disaster.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the rule amending 30 CFR Parts 
250 and 282 published at 70 FR 51478, August 30, 2005, is delayed until 
January 1, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kumkum Ray, Offshore Regulatory 
Programs (703) 787-1604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rule on Plans and Information that was 
published in the Federal Register on August 30, 2005 (70 FR 51478) 
provides that MMS will also publish a Notice to Lessees (NTL) to 
provide further guidance. The primary office responsible for developing 
the NTL, the MMS Gulf of Mexico Regional Office in New Orleans, 
Louisiana, has been temporarily moved since Hurricane Katrina and the 
flooding that followed that disaster. While critical functions have 
been continuously maintained, a portion of the associated staff and 
systems are expected to require two months to become fully functional. 
Moreover, many of the lessees and operators subject to the rule are 
similarly engaged in the restoration of normal operations following 
Hurricane Katrina. Lessees and operators will be making changes in 
their own procedures to comply with the rule. Lessees and operators 
whose operations have been interrupted as a result of the hurricane may 
not be able to make these changes until normal operations resume. 
Accordingly, the Department of the Interior is postponing the effective 
date of the final rule and the accompanying NTL until January 1, 2006.

    Dated: September 23, 2005.
Chad Calvert,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 05-19532 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. 552b]

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

3 p.m., Thursday, October 6, 2005.

# PLACE:

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# STATUS:

Closed meeting.

# MATTERS CONSIDERED:

The following matters will be considered during the closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:

Appeals to the Commission involving two original jursidction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

# AGENCY CONTACT:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

Dated: September 29, 2005.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 05-19927  Filed 9-30-05; 10:28 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
STATE v. Kenneth Kelly DUVALL

372P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Kenneth Kelly Duvall, for Duvall, Kenneth Kelly

Mr. David Learner, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of March 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
Cite as 2014 Ark. 163



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-14-263 IN RE FRANK DAVID REES, ARKANSAS BAR NO. 79238 Opinion Delivered April 10, 2014 PETITION TO SURRENDER ARKANSAS LAW LICENSE

GRANTED.

PER CURIAM On recommendation of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, we hereby accept the voluntary surrender, in lieu of impending disbarment proceedings, of the license of Frank David Rees of Jonesboro, in Craighead County, Arkansas, to practice law in the State of Arkansas. In his petition to voluntarily surrender his license to practice, filed with this court on March 20, 2014, Mr. Rees acknowledges that the many rules violations he is alleged to have committed likely would be proved at trial and would constitute serious misconduct as defined in section 17.B of the Arkansas Supreme Court Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct. Mr. Rees also states that he wishes to avoid the expense, stress, and publicity of disbarment proceedings. The name of Frank David Rees shall be removed from the registry of licensed attorneys, and he is barred and enjoined from engaging in the practice of law in the State of Arkansas. It is so ordered.
# C_2012174EN.01002202.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/22

---

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2012 — Pachtitis v Commission

(Case T-374/07) (1)

1

(Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition - Rejection of an application seeking to obtain a copy of the questions and answers to the admission tests - Lack of competence of the General Court - Referral to the Civil Service Tribunal)

2012/C 174/36

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Pachtitis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: initially P. Giatagantzidis and V. Niagkou, then P. Giatagantzidis and S. Stavropoulou, then P. Giatagantzidis and K. Kyriazi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and I. Chatzigiannis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents); Kingdom of Sweden (represented by A. Falk and S. Johannesson, acting as Agents); and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (represented by: H. Hijmans, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 27 June 2007, rejecting an application from the applicant seeking to obtain access to the questions which had been put to him in the context of his participation in the open competition EPSO/AD/77/06, to the answers which he had given to those questions and the sheet of correct answers, and, second, of the implied rejection of the confirmatory application which he had made on 10 July 2007 to EPSO.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Case T-374/07 is referred back to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Case T-374/07 is referred back to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Paul Block,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Worldwide, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

# 4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  May 12, 2006
|        | /s/ Paul Block                 |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name: Paul Block               |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-90820,  33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services, Inc.
on Forms S-8, and  Registration  Statement  No.  333-20499 of PennFed  Financial
Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 of our report  dated July 29,  2003,  (which  report
expresses an unqualified  opinion and includes an explanatory  paragraph related
to the  adoption  of FASB  Interpretation  No. 46,  "Consolidation  of  Variable
Interest  Entities")  appearing  in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of PennFed
Financial Services, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 19, 2003
STATE v. Brandon MALONE

379A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2018

Paul M. Green, Assistant Appellant Defender, James Ryan Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Malone, Brandon.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of May 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 6th day of June 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Edward L. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer and Steven R. Doll,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DSA Financial Corporation (the
"Company") each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they
have reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 and that to the best of their knowledge:

1.   the report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

July 29, 2004                        /s/ Edward L. Fischer
------------------                   -------------------------------------------
Date                                 Edward L. Fischer
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer



July 29, 2004                        /s/ Steven R. Doll
------------------                   -------------------------------------------
Date                                 Steven R. Doll
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD v. RICHARDSON, et al.

244A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 24, 2018

Norman W. Shearin, Attorney at Law, David P. Ferrell, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Richardson, William W., et al

M.H. Hood Ellis, Attorney at Law, Benjamin Marshall Gallop, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth City, for Town of Nags Head

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of August 2018 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of August 2018."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 5th day of October 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Major Alexander NEWKIRK III

No. COA17-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 19, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.