alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 17,251.

#### Olson Manufacturing Company, an Idaho Corporation *v.*Corsentino et al.

(280 P. [2d] 438)

Decided February 21, 1955.

*151Messrs. Denious & Denious, Mr. Robert G. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. David J. Miller, Mr. Melvin Dinner, Mr. Richard McKinley, for defendants in error Corsentino.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Holland

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The instant case presents the same issue which was considered and determined in Olson Manufacturing Co. v. Roberts, Olson Manufacturing Co. v. Poitz, and Olson Manufacturing Co. v. Baumgartner, decided this day; consequently our decision in those latter cases is applicable and controlling in the present litigation; accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moore dissents.

Mr. Justice Bradfield does not participate.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlton SOLOMON

No. COA17-651

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ James A. Thomas    
|                         |  | James A. Thomas        
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration
statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Peter J. Belies, Respondent, *v.*The Pennsylvania Building, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 28, 1943.

*1063
      *Merman Jervis*for appellant.

*Frederick E. Weinberg*for respondent.

Memorandum *Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff is not entitled to the coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 *et seq.).*The tenants of the building where plaintiff is employed are not engaged in the production of goods for commerce. Although a substantial number of defendant’s tenants are engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act plaintiff’s activities as an elevator operator are not in or so closely related to the movement of the commerce as to be a part of it within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act. (See *McLeod*v. *Threlkeld,*319 U. S. 491; *Johnson*v. *Dallas Downtown Development Co.,*132 F. 2d 287; *Stoike*v. *First Nat. Bank,*290 N. Y. 195.) *Kirschbaum*v. *Walling*(316 U. S. 517) holds nothing to the contrary. There some of the employees were elevator operators, but the tenants in the building were found by the court to have been engaged in the production of goods for commerce.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GuruNet Corporation
        (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Steven
        Steinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 a.
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 b.
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
                  Steven SteinbergDate:August
                  4th,
                  2005
              Steven
                  Steinberg
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request  .
Exhibit 13.01

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Tele Norte Leste
Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company, as amended by the Form 20-F/A to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2008                
|                                     
|/s/ Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa  
|Name: Luiz Eduardo Falco Pires Corrêa
|Title: Chief Executive Officer       



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2008            
|                                 
|/s/ José Luís Magalhães Salazar  
|Name: José Luís Magalhães Salazar
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice advises interested persons of the second meeting of the Technological Advisory Council (“Council”) under its charter renewed as of November 19, 2004.

# DATES:

October 27, 2005 at 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Commission Meeting Room (TW-C305), Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jeffery Goldthorp, (202) 418-1096 (voice), (202) 418-2989 (TTY), or email:                         *Jeffery.Goldthorp@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Increasing innovation and rapid advances in technology have accelerated changes in the ways that telecommunications services are provided to, and accessed by, users of communications services. The Federal Communications Commission must remain abreast of new developments in technologies and related communications to fulfill its responsibilities under the Communications Act. At this third meeting under the Council's new charter, the Council will consider ways that emerging technologies can improve communications resiliency. The Federal Communications Commission will attempt to accommodate as many persons as possible. Admittance,                           ( print page 58222)                        however, will be limited to the seating available. Unless so requested by the Council's Chair, there will be no public oral participation, but the public may submit written comments to Jeffery Goldthorp, the Federal Communications Commission's Designated Federal Officer for the Technological Advisory Council, before the meeting. Mr. Goldthorp's e-mail address is                     *Jeffery.Goldthorp@fcc.gov.*                     Mail delivery address is: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 7-A325, Washington, DC 20554.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-19992 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
|   | **EXHIBIT 12.2** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**Computation of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends**

 

The following table sets forth HomeBanc Corp.’s consolidated ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends for the periods shown:
|                                                  |   | **For the Six Months Ended June 30,** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                  |   | **2006**                              |   | **2005** |
|                                                  |   | **(Dollars in thousands)**            |
| **Fixed Charges**                                     |   |                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                      |   | $                                     | 137,920 |           | $ | 71,047 |
| Capitalized interest expense                          |   |                                  | 676 |   |   | — |
| Rental expense interest(1)                            |   |                                  | 2,082 |   |   | 1,884 |
| Total                                                 |   |                                  | 140,678 |   |   | 72,931 |
| **Preferred Stock Dividends**                         |   |                                  | 1,986 |   |   | — |
| **Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends** | $      | 142,664                               |   | $ | 72,931 |
|                                                  |   |                                  |   |   |   |   |
| **Earnings**                                          |   |                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Pre-tax income                                        |   | $                                     | 34 |   | $ | (16,372) |
| Income from equity investees                          |   |                                  | (402) |   |   | (514) |
| Fixed charges                                         |   |                                  | 140,678 |   |   | 72,931 |
| Amortization of capitalized interest                  |   |                                  | — |   |   | — |
| Minority interest                                     |   |                                  | 94 |   |   | 125 |
| Total                                                 |   | $                                     | 140,404 |   | $ | 56,170 |
| **Ratio**                                             |   |                                  | **0.98** |   |   | **0.77** |
| **Deficiency**                                        |   | $                                     | 2,260 |   | $ | 16,761 |
|                                                       |        |                                       |  |  |  |  |  |

 

 ______________________________
|   | (1) | Those portions of rent expense that are representative of interest cost. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In the MATTER OF: R.R.

No. COA17-779

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

REVERSED.
State of North Carolina v. Davey Ray Moss

No. COA16-584

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jermaine Jackson GOINS

No. 78P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Goins, Jermaine Jackson.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rebecca E. Lem, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 13th of March 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."

*857Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WLG Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Jillings, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and I, Edmund Pawelko, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 15, 2010





By:
                  /s/Andrew Jillings
                  
                  By:
                  /s/ Edmund PawelkoName:
      Andrew Jillings
                  
                  Name:
      Edmund PawelkoTitle:   Chief
      Executive Officer
                  
                  Title:   Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
                  
                  (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Power Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Abdul Mitha, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  July 16, 2007

By:  /s/ Abdul Mitha

Name: Abdul Mitha

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00369-CV

Peggy M. Blackburn

v.

Gilden B. Blackburn

§

§

§

§

From the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CV06-0012)

May 7, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse 

the trial court’s judgment to the extent that it adjudicated any healthcare 

reimbursement claims and render judgment that no such claims were raised or 

adjudicated. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear his or her own costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot_____________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2020

s0728 

# Order

Clerk July 29, 2020

161068 & (22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161068

COA: 351432

Gogebic CC: 2019

- 000029

- FH

THOMAS WAYNE RAYMOND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted. The motion to remand is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57854-57855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20022]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    In connection with its investigation into the cause of an explosion 
and fire which occurred at BP's Texas City refinery on March 23, 2005, 
the United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) 
announces that it will convene a community meeting starting at 6 p.m. 
at the Charles T. Doyle Convention Center, 2010 5th Avenue North, Texas 
City, Texas 77590. At the meeting CSB staff will present to the Board 
the preliminary results of their investigation into this incident. 
There will be a public comment period after the investigators' 
presentation.
    At approximately 1:20 p.m. on Wednesday, March 23rd, a series of 
explosions occurred at the BP Texas City refinery during the restarting 
of a hydrocarbon isomerization unit. Fifteen workers were killed and 
about 170 others were injured. Many of the victims were in or around 
work trailers located near a blowdown drum and stack that were open to 
the atmosphere. The explosions occurred when a distillation tower 
flooded with hydrocarbons and was overpressurized, resulting in a 
release of flammable hydrocarbons from the blowdown stack. After the 
staff presentation, the Board will allow a time for public comment. 
Following the conclusion of the public comment period, the Board will 
consider whether the preliminary facts presented necessitate any 
recommendations prior to the final completion of the Board's 
investigative report.
    All staff presentations are preliminary and are intended solely to 
allow the Board to consider in a public forum the issues and factors 
involved in this case. No factual analyses, conclusions or

[[Page 57855]]

findings should be considered final. Only after the Board has 
considered a final staff presentation and approved the staff report 
next year will there be an approved final record of this incident.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Please notify CSB if a 
translator or interpreter is needed, at least 5 business days prior to 
the public meeting. For more information, please contact the Chemical 
Safety and Hazard Investigation Board at (202) 261-7600, or visit our 
Web site at: www.csb.gov.

Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-20022 Filed 9-30-05; 3:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

Nos. 01-1382, 01-2273 TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. IDEAL ROOFING COMPANY, LTD., Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court, issued March 7, 2002, should be amended as follows: Cover: after " Christopher R. Benson with whom Marcy Hogan Greer , Susan J. Hightower , and Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., " add "and John R. Keville and Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP ,"
Thelma Bonner BOOTH, Widow and Administratrix of the Estate of Henry Hunter Booth, Jr., Deceased-Employee v. HACKNEY ACQUISITION COMPANY, f/k/a Hackney & Sons, Inc., f/k/a Hackney & Sons (East), f/k/a J.A. Hackney & Sons, Employer, North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association on behalf of American Mutual Liability Insurance, Carrier, and on behalf of The Home Insurance Company, Carrier

No. 402P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Edward L. Pauley, Attorney at Law, Salisbury, for Booth, Thelma Bonner (Widow & Adm.)

Christopher Blake, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Joe Eason, Attorney at Law, Matthew P. Blake, Attorney at Law, Cary, for North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 22nd of November 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant (NCIGA), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of December 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."