alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ervin WHITE, Employee, Plaintiff v. GUEST SERVICES, INC., Employer, Self-insured (Sedgwick CMS, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant.

No. COA17-1156

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
William G. ANTICO, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.

No. COA17-1085

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 3, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Reginald Ray BYNUM, Defendant, and Roland M. Loftin, Jr., Bail Agent, and Agent Associates Insurance, L.L.C., Surety.

No. COA17-4

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.
** **

**Exhibit10.2**

 

**AMENDMENT TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

This AMENDMENT, dated as of November 6, 2007,between GuruNet Israel Ltd., f/k/a Atomica Israel Technologies Ltd., an Israelicorporation (the “**Company**”) andSteven Steinberg, an individual (“**Employee**”),amends that Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2004 (the “**Employment Agreement**”).

 

1.                                       Pursuant tothis Amendment, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

Subsection 6.1 (“**TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT**”) of the Employment Agreement is herebydeleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

**6.1**       **Either party may terminate the Employee’s employment with the Companywithout cause at any time upon three months notice. The Company shall have theright, in its sole discretion, to require the Employee to continue working forthe Company during the notice period.  Ifthe Company terminates the Employee without cause pursuant to this Section, theBoard of Directors shall take the necessary steps so that the period duringwhich the Employee shall be permitted to exercise his options to purchaseshares of common stock of the Parent in accordance with the Parent’s employeestock option plan(s) as in effect from time to time (the “Options”), shall beextended to the shorter of****(a) one (1)year from the effective date of his termination or (b) the expiration date ofthe options.**

2.                                       Terms used inthis Amendment but not defined herein will have the respective meaningsascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.  In the event of any conflict between theterms of this Amendment and the terms of the Employment Agreement, thisAmendment shall control.  Except asmodified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full forceand effect.

 
| **AGREED AND ACCEPTED:** | ** **            | **AGREED AND ACCEPTED:**                                    |
|--------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **               | ** **            | ** **                                                  |
| **Steven Steinberg**     | ** **            | **GuruNet Israel Ltd.**                                     |
| ** **               | ** **            | ** **                                                  |
| **Signature:**           | /s/  Steven Steinberg | ** **                                                  | **Signature:** | /s/  Robert Rosenschein |
| ** **               |                  | ** **                                                  | ** ** |   |
| ** **               | ** **            | **Name:   Robert S.  Rosenschein**                |
| ** **               | ** **            | ** **                                                  |
| ** **               | ** **            | **Title:     Chief  Executive Officer** |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker license is canceled with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Name                 License No.        Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer International Customhouse         09327  San Francisco.
 Brokerage, Inc.
Eric A. Guillermety-Perez.........        14529  San Juan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: September 26, 2005.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-19769 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9410-06-P
In the MATTER OF: A.L.Z.

No. 9P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Robert W. Ewing, Attorney at Law, Clemmons, for Zedd, Teri.

Wayne A. Hollowell, Attorney at Law.

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, for Strader, Angel, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of January 2018 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of February 2018 by Respondent (Mother) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 27th of February 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Silver Standard Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ John SmithJohn SmithPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 14, 2014
STATE v. Jermel Toron KRIDER

68A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2018

Emily H. Davis, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Krider, Jermel Toron.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Allison A. Angell, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of March 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of March 2018."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICKEY MCGINNIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 204 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining 

issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether “generic” false memories expert testimony in a child sexual abuse 

prosecution, which the defendant is presenting solely to educate jurors 

about how legitimate and false/distorted memories are and can be created 

in children, is admissible at trial?

The above issue does not subsume any question of constitutional dimension. Petitioner’s 

application for relief is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4537 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4537

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   amounts received for personal injuries or sickness resulting from 
             service as a qualified public safety employee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2014

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   amounts received for personal injuries or sickness resulting from 
             service as a qualified public safety employee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS RECEIVED FOR PERSONAL INJURIES OR SICKNESS RESULTING 
              FROM SERVICE AS A QUALIFIED PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE 
              EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``or from service as a qualified public 
safety employee (as defined in section 72(t)(10)(B)),'' before ``or as 
a disability annuity''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered December 1, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00729-CR

EX PARTE ALIX HENRY SANDERS

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MC20-A1137-C

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s November 25, 2020 motion for extension of 

time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State to file its brief 

by December 30, 2020.

The record in this case does not include a certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal. The appeal cannot proceed without the trial court’s certification. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file, by 

December 30, 2020, a certification of appellant’s right to appeal.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Augustin Coustantin, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 353]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered October 26, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).





Dated:  March 26, 2010








/s/ Ellis L. Gutshall_____________


Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tom J. Fatjo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Tom J. Fatjo, Jr.Tom J. Fatjo, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerJuly 31, 2009







The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 401 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4527 

[Report No. 113–535] 

To remove a use restriction on land formerly a part of Acadia National 

Park that was transferred to the town of Tremont, Maine, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Ms. PINGREE of Maine) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 17, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4527 RH

A BILL 

To remove a use restriction on land formerly a part of 

Acadia National Park that was transferred to the town 

of Tremont, Maine, and for other purposes. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4527 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE RESTRICTION REMOVED. 

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the convey5 ance, for school purposes, of certain land in Acadia Na6 tional Park to the town of Tremont, Maine, and for other 

7 purposes’’, approved August 1, 1950, is amended by add8 ing at the end the following: ‘‘Lands conveyed to the town 

9 of Tremont, Maine, under the Act known as NPS Tract 

10 06–126, which were conveyed by the National Park Serv11 ice in deed recorded at the Hancock County Registry of 

12 Deeds Book 737 Page 467, National Park Service Deed 

13 377, shall no longer be required to be used exclusively and 

14 perpetually for school purposes and upon the discontinu15 ance of such use of said land, or any part thereof, shall 

16 no longer be required to revert to the United States.’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 401 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4527 

[Report No. 113–535] 

A BILL 

To remove a use restriction on land formerly a part 

poses. the town of Tremont, Maine, and for other purof Acadia National Park that was transferred to 

JULY 17, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 CFO Certification

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Schaffhauser, Executive Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Robert Schaffhauser                                
|Robert Schaffhauser Executive Vice President of
Finance

Date: August 11, 2008
October 11 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURAN CE COMPANY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00131

- CV V.

RONALD JERROLS , Appellee

____________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, TEXAS
MUTUAL INSURANCE COM PANY , and a motion for rehearing filed by appellee , RONALD JERROLS . We order that the motion s be overruled, and that this court’s former judgment of September 6, 2012, be vacated, set asid e, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of September 6, 2012, be withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, RONALD
JERROLS , signed February 8, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspecte d the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of
the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We order each party to pay their own costs incurred in this appeal. We further
order this decision certified below for observance.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JASON CAVEZZA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-30111

D.C. No. 3:02-cr-00491-KI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Federal prisoner Jason Cavezza appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider its April 29, 2014, order directing the Clerk to

return funds to Cavezza that he had sent to the court with a request for copies of

certain documents. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

MAY 19 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Cavezza contends that the district court should have directed the Clerk to

provide him with “certified” copies of certain documents from his criminal case

file or with a “certified” letter stating that the requested documents did not exist. 

We review the district court’s denial of the motion for reconsideration for abuse of

discretion. See United States v. Tapia-Marquez, 361 F.3d 535, 537 (9th Cir. 2004). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion because Cavezza has failed to show

that he is entitled to certified copies of the documents or the letter he requested. To

the extent that Cavezza petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, he has not

demonstrated that he is entitled to that extraordinary remedy. See Bauman v. U.S.

Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). 

AFFIRMED.

2 14-30111
# EUR-Lex - 12006M043 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M043

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VII - Provisions on enhanced cooperation - Article 43 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0031 - 0032 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0028 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0169 - Consolidated version *

Article 43

Member States which intend to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves may make use of the institutions, procedures and mechanisms laid down by this Treaty and by the Treaty establishing the European Community provided that the proposed cooperation:

(a) is aimed at furthering the objectives of the Union and of the Community, at protecting and serving their interests and at reinforcing their process of integration;

(b) respects the said Treaties and the single institutional framework of the Union;

(c) respects the acquis communautaire and the measures adopted under the other provisions of the said Treaties;

(d) remains within the limits of the powers of the Union or of the Community and does not concern the areas which fall within the exclusive competence of the Community;

(e) does not undermine the internal market as defined in Article 14(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, or the economic and social cohesion established in accordance with Title XVII of that Treaty;

(f) does not constitute a barrier to or discrimination in trade between the Member States and does not distort competition between them;

(g) involves a minimum of eight Member States;

(h) respects the competences, rights and obligations of those Member States which do not participate therein;

(i) does not affect the provisions of the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union;

(j) is open to all the Member States, in accordance with Article 43b.

--------------------------------------------------