alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4488 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to two bills enabling the presentation of congressional gold medals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4488 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Medal Technical 

3 Corrections Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO AN ACT THAT AU5 THORIZES PRESENTATION OF A CONGRES6 SIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO DR. MARTIN LU7 THER KING, JR., AND CORETTA SCOTT KING. 

8 Section 2 of Public Law 108–368 is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) by striking all before ‘‘to present’’ and 

11 inserting the following: ‘‘(a) PRESENTATION

12 AUTHORIZED.—The Speaker of the House of 

13 Representatives and the President pro tempore 

14 of the Senate are authorized’’; and 

15 (B) by striking ‘‘(posthumously)’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(c) SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.— 

18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Following the award of the 

19 gold medal in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 

20 and Coretta Scott King under subsection (a), the 

21 gold medal shall be given to the Smithsonian Insti22 tution, where it shall be available for display as ap23 propriate and made available for research. 

24 ‘‘(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 

25 Congress that the Smithsonian Institution shall 

26 make the gold medal received under paragraph (1) 
3 

•HR 4488 EH

1 available for display, particularly at the National 

2 Museum of African American History and Culture, 

3 or for loan as appropriate so that it may be dis4 played elsewhere, particularly at other appropriate 

5 locations associated with the lives of Dr. Martin Lu6 ther King, Jr., and Coretta Scott King.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO AN ACT THAT AU8 THORIZES PRESENTATION OF A CONGRES9 SIONAL GOLD MEDAL COLLECTIVELY TO THE 

10 MONTFORD POINT MARINES, UNITED STATES 

11 MARINE CORPS. 

12 Section 2 of Public Law 112–59 is amended by add13 ing at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(c) SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.— 

15 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Following the award of the 

16 gold medal in honor of the Montford Point Marines, 

17 United States Marine Corps under subsection (a), 

18 the gold medal shall be given to the Smithsonian In19 stitution, where it shall be available for display as 

20 appropriate and made available for research. 

21 ‘‘(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 

22 Congress that the Smithsonian Institution shall 

23 make the gold medal received under paragraph (1) 

24 available for display, particularly at the National 

25 Museum of African American History and Culture, 
4 

•HR 4488 EH

1 or for loan as appropriate so that it may be dis2 played elsewhere, particularly at other appropriate 

3 locations associated with the Montford Point Ma4 rines.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4488 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to two bills enabling 

and for other purposes. the presentation of congressional gold medals,
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 26, 2016

s1017

Order 

Clerk

October 26, 2016

151979

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151979

COA: 326878

Washtenaw CC: 07-000164-FC

CLINT ANTHONY OUSLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Boulevard Building Corporation, Petitioner, for Payment of an Award in Condemnation Proceedings (Calamus Ave., Borough of Queens).

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

April 1, 1943.

*Harold C. Krieger*for petitioner.

*Thomas D. Thacher, Corporation Counsel (Ten Broeck S. Imlay*of counsel), for City of New York.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Harry Kirshbaum*of counsel), for State of New York.

Lockwood, J.

The corporation applying for payment of the award was dissolved by proclamation on December 15, 1942, pursuant to section 203-a of the Tax Law. It filed no franchise tax reports for the years 1938 to 1941, inclusive, and it is not disputed that it owes franchise taxes to the State for these years in an unliquidated amount, which may be computed upon the filing by the corporation of its franchise tax reports for those years. Petitioner contends that unpaid franchise taxes do not become a lien upon the personal property of a corporation until the issuance of a warrant for their collection to the sheriff and the docketing thereof with the county clerk. The amount of the tax may not be computed and no warrant may be issued for its collection, unless the franchise tax reports are filed. There is no question here of whether the unpaid taxes are a lien on the award. It is not disputed that the taxes are unpaid and this dissolved corporation wishes to collect the award, which it would' unquestionably dissipate, leaving the taxes unpaid. The motion is granted to the extent that the award shall be paid to petitioner, subject to payment of the unpaid franchise taxes.
NICHOLS v. TERRY, et al.

296P15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2017

Ernest James Nichols, for Nichols, Ernest James.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Terry, Richard, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of December 2017 by Petitioner for Reconsideration:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of December 2017."
STATE v. Timothy Lee CREED

35P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Timothy Lee Creed, for Creed, Timothy Lee.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of January 2018 *876by Defendant for Writ of Errow, Coram Nobis:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE v. Derrick D. BOGER

158P06-15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Derrick D. Boger, for Boger, Derrick D.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of September 2017 by Defendant for Writ of Coram Nobis:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
#### Robert A. DUNN, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Rahn Bahia Mar Mgmt, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D03-2410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

Robert A. Dunn, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See*Fla. R. of App. P. 9.315(a).

FARMER, C.J., WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
#### C.P., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-529.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 22, 2003.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy-Loewinger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *State v. Causey,*503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987).

SHARP, W., PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of
Pure Biofuels Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 15, 2009/s/
      Luis GoyzuetaLuis
      Goyzueta, Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Billy Dean MORGAN

150A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 20, 2018

Sterling Rozear, Attorney at Law, for Morgan, Billy Dean

Brenda Eaddy, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of June 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of June 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 12th day of July 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Kevin Mark SABO, Respondent.

No. 641 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, there having been filed with this Court by Kevin Mark Sabo his verified Statement of Resignation dated May 9, 2003, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Kevin Mark Sabo be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania retroactive to February 26, 2001; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

HOMEBANC CORP.

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with HomeBanc Corp.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Kevin D.
Race, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kevin D. Race      
|                   |  |     |  | Kevin D. Race          
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010134EN.01003001.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Bianchi v ETF

(Case T-338/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Temporary staff - Contract for a fixed period - Decision refusing to renew the contract - Article 47(b) of the CEOS)

2010/C 134/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Irène Bianchi (Turin, Italy) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Training Foundation (ETF) (Turin, Italy) (represented by: M. Dunbar, Agent, assisted by G. Vandersanden, then by L. Levi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 28 June 2007 of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) in Case F-38/06 Bianchi v ETF, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment

Bianchi

ETF

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mrs Irène Bianchi to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Training Foundation (ETF) for the purposes of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mrs Irène Bianchi to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Training Foundation (ETF) for the purposes of these proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
# Official Journal C 61/15 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 61 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6215 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 61

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6215 February 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 61/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 61/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 10 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 61/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 61/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyler Dale MCCURRY

No. COA17-169

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

NO ERROR AT TRIAL. REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
# Official Journal L 169/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6412 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 169

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6412 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 of 10 May 2021 authorising Member States, in accordance with Council Directive 1999/105/EC, to temporarily decide on the equivalence of forest reproductive material of certain categories produced in certain third countries
  (notified under document C(2021) 3194) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 of 10 May 2021 authorising Member States, in accordance with Council Directive 1999/105/EC, to temporarily decide on the equivalence of forest reproductive material of certain categories produced in certain third countries
  (notified under document C(2021) 3194)

(notified under document C(2021) 3194)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
ALLIED SPECTRUM, LLC d/b/a Apex Crown Express v. GERMAN AUTO CENTER, INC., Mohamed Ali Darar, and Reem Tamim Darar

No. 453A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed March 2, 2018

Bratcher Adams PLLC, by Brice M. Bratcher and J. Denton Adams, for plaintiff-appellant.

Austin Law Firm, PLLC, by John S. Austin, for defendant-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4371 

To redesignate the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 

in California as the ‘‘Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 

Recreation Area’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2014 

Mr. COOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle 

Recreation Area in California as the ‘‘Johnson Valley 

National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Johnson Valley Off-High5 way Vehicle Recreation Area in California is hereby redes6 ignated as the ‘‘Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Ve7 hicle Recreation Area’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4371 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subtitle C of title 

2 XXIX of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis3 cal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended— 

4 (1) in section 2942(c)(3), by striking ‘‘Johnson 

5 Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Ve7 hicle Recreation Area’’; and 

8 (2) in section 2945— 

9 (A) in the section heading, by inserting 

10 ‘‘NATIONAL’’ after ‘‘VALLEY’’; 

11 (B) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘Na12 tional’’ after ‘‘Valley’’ in the matter preceding 

13 paragraph (1); and 

14 (C) in subsections (b), (c), and (d), by in15 serting ‘‘National’’ after ‘‘Valley’’ each place it 

16 appears. 

17 (c) RELATION TO AUTHORIZED NAVY USE.—The re18 designation of the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle 

19 Recreation Area as the ‘‘Johnson Valley National Off20 Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’ does not alter or inter21 fere with the rights and obligations of the Navy regarding 

22 the use of portions of the Recreation Area as provided in 

23 subtitle C of title XXIX of the National Defense Author24 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66). 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4371 IH

1 (d) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula2 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United 

3 States to the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recre4 ation Area is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Johnson 

5 Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Amended notice (due to tropical storm Rita).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference).
    The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, 
and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 27, 2005, from 1:30 
p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 27, 2005 from 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET via a telephone 
conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. 
De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, 
Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-
1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.
Martha Curry,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 05-19220 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P