```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58061-58065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19761]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 27

[WT Docket No. 02-353; FCC 05-149]

Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 
2.1 GHz Bands

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission resolves five petitions for 
reconsideration of the Report and Order adopting service rules for 
Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz 
bands. In this Order, the Commission modifies the band plan and makes 
minor revisions to the service rules to provide additional 
opportunities for smaller and rural wireless carriers and to enhance 
flexibility for potential licensees. In all other respects, the 
Commission denies the petitions for reconsideration. The Commission 
takes this action to facilitate the provision of new services to the 
public, and to encourage the optimum use of these frequencies.

DATES: Effective November 4, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Corea of the Broadband Division, 
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at 202-418-BITS (2487) (voice) or 
202-418-1169 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order 
on Reconsideration in WT Docket No. 02-353, FCC 05-149, adopted on 
August 5, 2005, and released on August 15, 2005. The full text of this 
document is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 
Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. To request materials 
in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large 
print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to 
[email protected] or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 
202-418-0530 (voice) or 202-418-0432 (tty).

Overview

    1. On November 25, 2003, the Commission adopted licensing, 
technical, and competitive bidding rules to govern the use of the 
Advanced Wireless Services spectrum in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz 
bands. This Order on Reconsideration resolves petitions for 
reconsideration of the service rules Report and Order. (Service Rules 
for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report 
and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 69 FR 5711-01 (Feb. 6, 2004)). 
Specifically, this Order decides the following issues.
    2. The AWS band plan for the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands is 
modified as follows. Twenty megahertz of spectrum at 1710-1720, paired 
with 2110-2120 will be licensed on a Rural Service Area/Metropolitan 
Statistical Area (RSA/MSA) basis. Thirty megahertz of spectrum in this 
band will be licensed on an Economic Area (EA) basis: 20 megahertz at 
1720-1730 paired with 2120-2130, and 10 megahertz at 1730-1735 paired 
with 2130-2135. Forty megahertz of spectrum will be licensed on a 
Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) basis and these blocks

[[Page 58062]]

will be contiguous in a manner that is convenient for aggregation. The 
Commission breaks up the original 2x15 MHz REAG block into a 2x5 MHz E 
block located at 1740-1745 and 2140-2145 MHz and a new 20 megahertz F 
block located at 1745-1755 MHz paired with 2145-2155 MHz.
    3. The Commission denies a petition filed by Council Tree 
Communications, Inc. that seeks a set-aside of spectrum in the 1710-
1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands for entities that meet the small 
business size standards used to determine eligibility for bidding 
credits. In addition, the Commission rejects Council Tree's proposals 
to amend the designated entity rules in this proceeding, but it stated 
it would examine, in a separate action, Council Tree's proposal to 
restrict large incumbent wireless service providers from having any 
material investment, financial, or operating relationship with a 
designated entity, if they have licenses with material geographic 
overlap.
    4. The Order grants a petition filed by Powerwave Technologies, 
Inc. and removes the restriction on transmitter output power levels on 
AWS licensees as was recently done for PCS licensees in the Biennial 
Regulatory Review--Amendment of parts 1, 22, 24, 27, and 90 to 
Streamline and Harmonize Various Rules Affecting Wireless Radio 
Services, WT Docket No. 03-264, FCC 05-144 (rel. Aug. 9, 2005).
    5. American Petroleum Institute and United Telecom Council (API/
UTC) filed a joint petition in ET Dockets 95-18 and 00-258, as well as 
WT Docket 02-353, seeking clarification and reconsideration of the 
Fixed Microwave Service relocation procedures adopted for the 2110-2150 
MHz band. The Commission addressed API/UTC's petition in the MSS Fifth 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, granting the petition in part and denying 
the petition otherwise. (Amendment of part 2 of the Commission's Rules 
to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to 
Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including 
Third Generation Wireless Systems, Petition for Rule Making of the 
Wireless Information Networks Forum Concerning the Unlicensed Personal 
Communications Service, Petition for Rule Making of UTStarcom, Inc., 
Concerning the Unlicensed Personal Communications Service, Amendment of 
Section 2.106 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz 
for use by the Mobile-Satellite Service, ET Docket No. 00-258, RM-9498, 
RM-10024, ET Docket No. 95-18, Sixth Report and Order, Third Memorandum 
Opinion and Order, and Fifth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 69 FR 62615-
01 (Oct. 27, 2004)). Because the Commission had previously addressed 
the petition in a prior proceeding, the Commission denies the petition 
relative to this proceeding.

II. Procedural Matters

A. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis

    6. This Order does not contain any new or modified information 
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 
(PRA), Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain 
any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business 
concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business 
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(4).

B. Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    7. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as 
amended (RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was 
incorporated in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in WT Docket No. 02-
353 (NPRM). The Commission sought written public comment on the 
proposals in the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. In addition, a 
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) was incorporated in the 
Report and Order in WT Docket No. 02-353. This present Supplemental 
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental FRFA) for the Order 
on Reconsideration conforms to the RFA.
Need for, and Objectives of, the Amended Rules
    8. The Order on Reconsideration responds to petitions for 
reconsideration of the Report and Order adopting service rules for 
Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands 
(AWS-1). The need for and objectives of the rules adopted in this Order 
on Reconsideration are the same as those discussed in the FRFA for the 
Report and Order. In the Report and Order, the Commission adopted 
provisions for application, licensing, operating and technical rules, 
and for competitive bidding for AWS-1. As adopted, the rules provide 
flexibility to licensees to provide any fixed or mobile service that is 
consistent with the allocations for this spectrum and, in order to 
accommodate differing needs, the band plan includes both localized and 
regional geographic service areas and symmetrically paired spectrum 
blocks with pairings composed of different bandwidths. The market-
oriented licensing framework for these bands will ensure that this 
spectrum is efficiently utilized and will foster the development of new 
and innovative technologies and services, as well as encourage the 
growth and development of broadband services, ultimately leading to 
greater benefits to consumers.
    9. On reconsideration, we take the following actions: (i) Modify 
the band plan to increase the amount of spectrum available to smaller 
and rural wireless carriers; (ii) break a 30 MHz block into smaller 
components that can be aggregated; (iii) offer an additional block 
licensed on an Economic Area (EA) basis to help enhance the mixture of 
large and small geographic area licenses available to applicants; and 
(iv) eliminate the transmitter output power limits for AWS base and 
fixed stations to make the rule consistent with the rule governing PCS 
stations. The Commission affirmed its decision in the AWS-1 service 
rules Report and Order not to set aside spectrum for designated 
entities in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands and also affirmed its 
decision to provide two levels of bidding credits.
Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public
    10. We received no comments directly in response to the IRFA or 
FRFA in this proceeding. We did, however, consider the potential impact 
of our rules on smaller entities. For example, in the present Order on 
Reconsideration, we have adopted certain changes in the band plan 
requested by the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) and the Rural 
Telecommunications Group (RTG), in conjunction with other commenting 
parties, which increase the amount of spectrum and number of spectrum 
blocks licensed on a smaller geographic basis. These changes are 
expected to increase opportunities for local, largely rural carriers, 
to be able to afford adequate spectrum and to utilize a building block 
approach to suit their particular needs.
    11. We also note that in the Report and Order, the Commission 
decided to encourage participation by smaller and rural entities by 
adopting smaller geographic licensing areas such as MSAs and RSAs, as 
well as smaller spectrum block sizes, rather than adopting set-asides 
or eligibility restrictions. The Commission reasoned that opening the 
bands to as wide a range of applicants as possible would encourage 
entrepreneurial efforts to develop new technologies and services, while 
helping ensure the spectrum is used efficiently.

[[Page 58063]]

    12. In a petition for reconsideration, Council Tree urged the 
Commission to reconsider its decision not to adopt a set aside of 
spectrum for designated entities in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz 
bands or, in the alternative, to adopt a third level of bidding credit. 
In a separate ex parte filing, Council Tree also made certain proposals 
relating to designated entity status and benefits, such as bidding 
credits. As noted above, while we affirm the Commission's decision in 
the AWS-1 service rules Report and Order and decline to amend the 
designated entity rules in this proceeding, we will examine, in a 
separate action, Council Tree's proposal to restrict large incumbent 
wireless service providers from having any material investment, 
financial, or operating relationship with a designated entity, if they 
have licenses with material geographic overlap.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the 
Rules Will Apply
    13. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where 
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be 
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA generally defines 
the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms 
``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small government 
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same 
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business 
Act. A small business is one which: (i) Is independently owned and 
operated; (ii) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (iii) 
satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA. Nationwide, 
there are approximately 22.4 million small businesses, total, according 
to the SBA data.
    14. A small organization is generally ``any not-for-profit 
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not 
dominant in its field.'' Nationwide, as of 2002, there were 
approximately 1.6 million small organizations. Last, the definition of 
``small governmental jurisdiction'' is one with populations of fewer 
than 50,000. The term ``small governmental jurisdiction'' is defined as 
``governments of cities, towns, townships, villages, school districts, 
or special districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand.'' 
As of 1997, there were about 87,453 governmental jurisdictions in the 
United States. This number includes 39,044 county governments, 
municipalities, and townships, of which 37,546 (approximately 96.2%) 
have populations of fewer than 50,000, and of which 1,498 have 
populations of 50,000 or more. Thus we estimate the number of small 
governmental jurisdictions overall to be 84,098 or fewer.
    15. The rules amended in the Order on Reconsideration affect 
applicants who wish to provide service in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-
2155 MHz bands. As discussed in the Report and Order, we do not know 
precisely the type of service that a licensee in these bands might seek 
to provide. Nonetheless, we anticipate that the services that will be 
deployed in these bands may have capital requirements comparable to 
those in the broadband Personal Communications Service (PCS), and that 
the licensees in these bands will be presented with issues and costs 
similar to those presented to broadband PCS licensees. Further, at the 
time the broadband PCS service was established, it was similarly 
anticipated that it would facilitate the introduction of a new 
generation of service. Therefore, the Report and Order adopted the same 
small business size standards here that the Commission adopted for the 
broadband PCS service. In particular, the Report and Order defined a 
``small business'' as an entity with average annual gross revenues for 
the preceding three years not exceeding $40 million, and a ``very small 
business'' as an entity with average annual gross revenues for the 
preceding three years not exceeding $15 million. The Report and Order 
also provided small businesses with a bidding credit of 15 percent and 
very small businesses with a bidding credit of 25 percent.
    16. We do not yet know how many applicants or licensees in these 
bands will be small entities. Thus, the Commission assumes, for 
purposes of this Supplemental FRFA, that all prospective licensees are 
small entities as that term is defined by the SBA or by our three 
special small business size standards for these bands. Although we do 
not know for certain which entities are likely to apply for these 
frequencies, we note that the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands are 
comparable to those used for cellular service and personal 
communications service.
Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, Personal Communications Service 
(PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers
    17. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for 
wireless small businesses within the two separate categories of Paging 
and Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications. Under both SBA 
categories, a wireless business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer 
employees. We can assess small business prevalence by using data 
provided annually to the Commission by Telecommunications Relay Service 
(TRS) carriers. The TRS data compilation, published in the Commission's 
Trends in Telephone Service, groups together cellular, personal 
communications services, and specialized mobile radio telephony 
carriers into a single category called ``Wireless Telephony.'' (FCC, 
Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, 
``Trends in Telephone Service'' at Table 5.3, page 5-5 (May 2004).) As 
noted above, under the pertinent SBA small business size standard, a 
wireless business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. 
According to Trends in Telephone Service data, 447 carriers have 
reported that they provide Wireless Telephony. Of that total, an 
estimated 245 are small providers, under the SBA size standard. Thus, 
we can estimate that the majority of such businesses are small. In 
addition, the TRS data include a larger reporting category, ``Wireless 
Service Providers,'' that includes the above entities plus paging, 
data, and other mobile providers. According to the Trends in Telephone 
Service data, 975 carriers have reported that they are Wireless Service 
Providers. Of that total, an estimated 767 are small providers, under 
the SBA size standard. Thus, we can again estimate that the majority of 
such businesses are small. Consequently, the Commission estimates that 
most wireless service providers, as defined herein, are small.
Description of Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
Requirements for Small Entities
    18. Applicants for AWS licenses in the 1710-1755 MHz and the 2110-
2155 MHz bands will be required to submit short-form auction 
applications using FCC Form 175. In addition, winning bidders must 
submit long-form license applications through the Universal Licensing 
System using Form 601, FCC Ownership Disclosure Information for the 
Wireless Telecommunications Services using FCC Form 602, and other 
appropriate forms. These requirements were established in the Report 
and Order and are not modified by the Order on Reconsideration.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, 
and Significant Alternatives Considered
    19. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant 
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its adopted approach, 
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (i) 
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting

[[Page 58064]]

requirements or timetables that take into account the resources 
available to small entities; (ii) the clarification, consolidation, or 
simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule 
for small entities; (iii) the use of performance, rather than design, 
standards; and (iv) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part 
thereof, for small entities.
    20. We have taken significant steps to reduce burdens on small 
entities wherever possible, and considered various alternatives in this 
regard. To provide opportunities for small entities to participate in 
any auction that is held, we provide bidding credits for small 
businesses and very small businesses. The bidding credits adopted are 
15 percent for small businesses and 25 percent for very small 
businesses. Although petitioner Council Tree requested set asides for 
designated entities in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands, we 
have found that the use of tiered or graduated small business size 
standards and bidding credits is useful in furthering our mandate under 
section 309(j) of the Communications Act to promote opportunities for, 
and disseminate licenses to, a wide variety of applicants. As discussed 
above in the Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public, we decline 
to supplement the incentives for small business participation that the 
Commission has already adopted by foreclosing any of the licenses to 
other bidders.
    21. Regarding our decisions to modify slightly the licensing 
approach to provide additional spectrum licensed on an RSA/MSA basis 
and to add an additional block offered on an EA basis, we anticipate 
that on balance small entities will benefit from this licensing 
approach. Geographic licensing in these bands supports the Commission's 
overall spectrum management goals in that it allows licensees to 
quickly respond to market demand. Small entities that acquire spectrum 
that is licensed on a geographic area basis will benefit from such 
flexibility. Moreover, we have attempted to strike a balance by using 
varying sizes of geographic areas. For example, small entities may be 
more interested in spectrum licensed using smaller geographic areas 
rather than in spectrum licensed on a nationwide or large regional 
basis. Consequently, we have decided to include licensing areas based 
on MSAs and RSAs, which permit entities who are only interested in 
serving rural areas to acquire spectrum licenses for these areas alone, 
and avoid acquiring spectrum licenses with high population densities 
that make purchase of license rights too expensive for these types of 
entities. MSAs and RSAs allow entities to mix and match rural and urban 
areas according to their business plans. These types of smaller 
geographic service areas provide entry opportunities for smaller 
carriers, new entrants, and rural telephone companies. Their inclusion 
in our band plan will foster service to rural areas and tribal lands 
and thereby bring the benefits of advanced services to these areas. 
Smaller service providers could acquire an RSA and create a new service 
area or they could expand an existing service territory or supplement 
the spectrum they are licensed to operate in by adding an RSA. They 
could also combine a few MSAs and RSAs to create a larger but localized 
service territory. An alternative to our decision to use geographic 
areas for licensing would have been to employ a site-by-site licensing 
approach. Site-by-site licensing, however, would be an inefficient 
licensing method due to a greater strain on Commission resources and 
less flexibility afforded to licensees.
    22. We have also made adjustments to the band plan to license the 
spectrum in different bandwidths. We do not believe this will 
disadvantage small entities. In fact, we have decided that the RSA/MSA 
license areas will be licensed as paired spectrum at 1710-1720 and 
2110-2120 for a total of 734 licenses, and we have decided that the B 
and C blocks will be licensed as paired 10- and 5-MHz blocks, 
respectively, on an EA basis. These block sizes should provide 
flexibility to licensees in constructing their systems. Our approach 
provides maximum flexibility for both small and large entities to offer 
a wide range of communications services.
Report to Congress
    23. The Commission will send a copy of the Order on 
Reconsideration, including this Supplemental FRFA, in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act. In addition, the Commission will send a 
copy of the Order on Reconsideration, including the Supplemental FRFA, 
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 
A copy of the Order on Reconsideration and Supplemental FRFA (or 
summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register.

Ordering Clauses

C. Authority

    24. This action is taken pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201, 214, 
301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 319, 324, 332, and 333 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 301, 
302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 319, 324, 332, and 333.
    25. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Petition for 
Reconsideration filed by Rural Communications Association is granted to 
the extent indicated herein, and is otherwise denied.
    26. It is further ordered that the Petition for Reconsideration 
filed by T-Mobile, USA, Inc. is granted to the extent indicated herein, 
and is otherwise denied.
    27. It is further ordered that the Petition for Reconsideration 
filed by Council Tree Communications, Inc. is denied.
    28. It is further ordered that the Petition for Reconsideration 
filed by Powerwave Technologies, Inc. is granted to the extent 
indicated herein.
    29. It is further ordered that part 27 of the Commission's Rules is 
amended as set forth in the final rule changes.
    30. It is further ordered that the Petition for Reconsideration 
filed by American Petroleum Institute and United Telecom Council is 
denied to the extent indicated herein.
    31. It is further ordered that the rule amendments made by this 
Order and specified in the final rule changes shall become effective 
November 4, 2005.
    32. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a 
copy of this Order, including the Supplemental Final Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
Business Administration.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 27

    Communications common carriers, Radio.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.

Final Rules

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications 
Commission amends 47 CFR part 27 as follows:

PART 27--MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 27 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336, and 
337 unless otherwise noted.

0
2. Section 27.5 is amended by revising paragraph (h) to read as 
follows:

[[Page 58065]]

Sec.  27.5  Frequencies.

* * * * *
    (h) 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. The following 
frequencies are available for licensing pursuant to this part in the 
1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands:
    (1) Three paired channel blocks of 10 megahertz each are available 
for assignment as follows:
    Block A: 1710-1720 MHz and 2110-2120 MHz;
    Block B: 1720-1730 MHz and 2120-2130 MHz; and
    Block F: 1745-1755 MHz and 2145-2155 MHz.
    (2) Three paired channel blocks of 5 megahertz each are available 
for assignment as follows:
    Block C: 1730-1735 MHz and 2130-2135 MHz;
    Block D: 1735-1740 MHz and 2135-2140 MHz; and
    Block E: 1740-1745 MHz and 2140-2145 MHz.
* * * * *

0
3. Section 27.6 is amended by revising paragraph (h) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  27.6  Service areas.

* * * * *
    (h) 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands. AWS service areas for the 
1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands are as follows:
    (1) Service areas for Block A (1710-1720 MHz and 2110-2120 MHz) are 
based on cellular markets comprising Metropolitan Statistical Areas 
(MSAs) and Rural Service Areas (RSAs) as defined by Public Notice 
Report No. CL-92-40 ``Common Carrier Public Mobile Services 
Information, Cellular MSA/RSA Markets and Counties,'' dated January 24, 
1992, DA 92-109, 7 FCC Rcd 742 (1992), with the following 
modifications:
    (i) The service areas of cellular markets that border the U.S. 
coastline of the Gulf of Mexico extend 12 nautical miles from the U.S. 
Gulf coastline.
    (ii) The service area of cellular market 306 that comprises the 
water area of the Gulf of Mexico extends from 12 nautical miles off the 
U.S. Gulf coast outward into the Gulf.
    (2) Service areas for Blocks B (1720-1730 MHz and 2120-2130 MHz) 
and C (1730-1735 MHz and 2130-2135 MHz) are based on Economic Areas 
(EAs) as defined in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (3) Service areas for blocks D (1735-1740 MHz and 2135-2140 MHz), E 
(1740-1745 MHz and 2140-2145 MHz) and F (1745-1755 MHz and 2145-2155 
MHz) are based on Regional Economic Area Groupings (REAGs) as defined 
by paragraph (a) of this section.

0
4. Section 27.11 is amended by revising section (i) to read as follows:

Sec.  27.11  Initial authorization.

* * * * *
    (i) 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. Initial authorizations 
for the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands shall be for 5 or 10 
megahertz of spectrum in each band in accordance with Sec.  27.5(h) of 
this part.
    (1) Authorizations for Block A, consisting of two paired channels 
of 10 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(1).
    (2) Authorizations for Block B, consisting of two paired channels 
of 10 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(2).
    (3) Authorizations for Block C, consisting of two paired channels 
of 5 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(2).
    (4) Authorizations for Blocks D, consisting of two paired channels 
of 5 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(3).
    (5) Authorizations for Blocks E, consisting of two paired channels 
of 5 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(3).
    (6) Authorizations for Block F, consisting of two paired channels 
of 10 megahertz each, will be based on those geographic areas specified 
in Sec.  27.6(h)(3).

0
5. Section 27.50 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) introductory 
text and (d)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  27.50  Power and antenna height limits.

* * * * *
    (d) The following power and antenna height requirements apply to 
stations transmitting in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands:
    (1) The power of each fixed or base station transmitting in the 
2110-2155 MHz band and located in any county with population density of 
100 or fewer persons per square mile, based upon the most recently 
available population statistics from the Bureau of the Census, is 
limited to a peak equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) of 
3280 watts. The power of each fixed or base station transmitting in the 
2110-2155 MHz band from any other location is limited to a peak EIRP of 
1640 watts. A licensee operating a base or fixed station utilizing a 
power of more than 1640 watts EIRP must coordinate such operations in 
advance with all Government and non-Government satellite entities in 
the 2025-2110 MHz band. Operations above 1640 watts EIRP must also be 
coordinated in advance with the following licensees within 120 
kilometers (75 miles) of the base or fixed station: all Broadband Radio 
Service (BRS) licensees authorized under part 27 in the 2155-2160 MHz 
band and all AWS licensees in the 2110-2155 MHz band.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-19761 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```