alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7650

CHARLES LOMAX, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:05-cv-03034) Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Lomax seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely and without merit. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lomax has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56529-56530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Women Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee 
on Women Veterans will meet November 1-3, 2005, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. each day, in room C-7, VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs regarding the needs of women veterans with respect to health 
care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and 
activities administered by VA designed to meet such needs. The 
Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such 
programs and activities.
    On November 1, the agenda will include a briefing from VHA's Women 
Veterans Health Program Director, VA's mammography program, the 
Commander of the Joint Task Force for Sexual Assault Prevention and 
Response from the Department of Defense, VA's ``Seamless Transition'' 
initiative, the required ethics briefing, an update on the 2004 Report 
of the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans recommendation matrix, and 
presentation of Certificates of Appointment to four new Committee 
members. On November 2, the Committee will receive briefings and 
updates on issues related to women veterans in the Veterans Health 
Administration, the National Committee for Employer Support of the 
Guard and Reserve, and medical exams for separating and retiring 
service members. On November 3, the Committee will receive briefings 
and updates on issues in the Veterans Benefits Administration, 
including the review of PTSD ratings disparities, legislative issues 
related to veterans, and will discuss any new issues that the Committee 
members may introduce.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Ms. 
Rebecca Schiller, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for 
Women Veterans (00W), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. 
Ms. Schiller may be contacted either by phone at (202) 273-6193, fax at 
(202) 273-7092, or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4c4c4a3b499959d98da8295da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e5e5e392e030f070240180f40090118">[email protected]</span></a>. Interested persons may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the Committee. Written 
statements must be filed before

[[Page 56530]]

the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting.

    Dated: September 19, 2005.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19284 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association, International (“DASMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association, International, Cleveland, OH. The nature and scope of DASMA's standards development activities are: to date, more than fourteen standards for garage doors, rolling doors, fire doors, grilles, counter shutters, sheet doors, high performance doors, garage door and gate operators, and remote controls for garage door and gate operators, many prepared and updated in coordination with the American National Standards Institute.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-1978  Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Bruce BALKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-4900.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 2003.

Bruce Balkey, Hollywood, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Balkey appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. The trial court denied the motion as untimely without addressing the merits of Balkey’s claims. However, as Balkey argued below,' the motion was timely filed based on Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.040.

Two of the claims raised in the postcon-viction motion are legally sufficient and not refuted by any record attachments: (1) Balkey alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not object that a lesser offense of the criminal mischief charge was stated incorrectly on the verdict form; and (2) he alleged that his attorney should have objected when the court imposed a thousand dollars restitution in this case because, based on the jury verdict, restitution should have been less than a thousand dollars.

We reverse and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that appellant is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WARNER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57853-57854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introduction, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Modoc 
County Speaker, (5) Sub-Committee Reports, (6) Chairman's Perspective, 
(7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, (9) Next Agenda.

[[Page 57854]]


DATES: The meeting will be held on October 13, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end 
at approximately 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, 
Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals 
wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and 
proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, PO Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e4e4e2e7e7eaedeac3e5f0ade5e6e7adf6f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e19191f1a1a1710173e180d50181b1a500b0d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by October 11, 2005 will have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: September 28, 2005.
James F. Giachino,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-19792 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.00

                                        
                              RED ROOF INNS, INC.
                                        
                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                      FOR
                         ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
                               FORMS 3, 4, AND 5




The undersigned director and officer of Red Roof Inns, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and appoints David L. Rea,
and Alan L. Tallis, collectively and individually, as his agents and
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to (a)
sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on his behalf and in his name,
place, and stead in any and all capacities with respect to the registration
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), including pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; (b) sign and file any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K; (c) sign and
file any and all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") covered by the Form 10-K; (d) sign
and file any or all Forms 3, 4, or 5 required to be filed by him with the
Commission under the Act, including pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act; (e)
sign and file any and all amendments to Forms 3, 4, or 5; and (f) do and perform
any and all other acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required;
and (2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant
hereto by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their
substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director and officer of the Company has
hereunto set his hand as of the 25th day of February, 1999.



                                                   /s/ Francis W. Cash
                                                   -------------------
                                                   Francis W. Cash
CORWIN v. BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC, et al.

56PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2017

Alan W. Duncan, Attorney at Law, Stephen M. Russell, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jason M. Leviton, Attorney at Law, Joel A. Fleming, Attorney at Law, for Corwin, Robert (Dr.), et al.

Michael L. Robinson, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, H. Brent Helms, Attorney at Law, Gary A. Bornstein, Attorney at Law, for British American Tobacco PLC.

Ronald R. Davis, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, W. Andrew Copenhaver, Attorney at Law, James A. Dean, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Robert C. Micheletto, Attorney at Law, Thomas E. Lynch, Attorney at Law, Andrew S. Kleinfeld, Attorney at Law, for Reynolds American, Inc., et al.

James P. McLoughlin, Jr., Attorney at Law, Mark A. Nebrig, Attorney at Law, Jonathan M. Watkins, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Karen Seymour, Attorney at Law, *727Frank Schall, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Jobin, Luc, et al.

Alan M. Ruley, Attorney at Law, William K. Davis, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of August 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 5th day of September 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4306 

To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule and for prevailing 

rate employees by 3.3 percent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2014 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. 

CARTWRIGHT, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. 

LYNCH, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule 

and for prevailing rate employees by 3.3 percent, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Adjustment 

5 of Income Rates Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY. 

7 (a) GENERAL SCHEDULE.—For calendar year 2015, 

8 the percentage adjustment under section 5303 of title 5, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4306 IH

1 United States Code, in the rates of basic pay under the 

2 General Schedule shall be 3.3 percent. Any adjustment 

3 made by the President with respect to calendar year 2015 

4 pursuant to such section shall have no force or effect. 

5 (b) PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES.—Notwithstand6 ing the wage survey requirements under section 5343(b) 

7 of title 5, United States Code, for calendar year 2015, the 

8 rates of basic pay for prevailing rate employees in each 

9 wage area (as in effect on January 1, 2015 under section 

10 5343(a) of such title) and the rates of basic pay under 

11 sections 5348 and 5349 of such title shall be increased 

12 by 3.3 percent. Any increase made by the President with 

13 respect to calendar year 2015 pursuant to section 

14 5343(a), 5348, or 5349 of such title shall have no force 

15 or effect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
RE: EXPANSION OF ELECTRONIC FILING PILOT PROGRAM-COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Appellate Case No. 2015-002439

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 8, 2018

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article V, Section 4 of the South Carolina Constitution, *41IT IS ORDERED that the Pilot Program for the Electronic Filing (E-Filing) of documents in the Court of Common Pleas, which was established by Order dated December 1, 2015, is expanded to include York County. Effective February 27, 2018, all filings in all common pleas cases commenced or pending in York County must be E-Filed if the party is represented by an attorney, unless the type of case or the type of filing is excluded from the Pilot Program. The counties currently designated for mandatory E-Filing are as follows:

```
Aiken Allendale Anderson Bamberg Barnwell Beaufort Cherokee Clarendon Colleton Edgefield Georgetown Greenville Greenwood Hampton Horry Jasper Kershaw Laurens Lee Lexington McCormick Newberry Oconee Pickens Saluda Spartanburg Sumter Williamsburg **York - Effective February 27, 2018**
```

Attorneys should refer to the South Carolina Electronic Filing Policies and Guidelines, which were adopted by the Supreme Court on October 28, 2015, and the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page at *http://www.sccourts.org/efiling/* to determine whether any specific filings are exempted from the requirement that they be E-Filed. Attorneys who have cases pending in Pilot Counties are strongly encouraged to review, and to instruct their staff to review, the training materials available on the E-Filing Portal page.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*

Donald W. Beatty

Chief Justice of South Carolina
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Ronaldo Iabrudi dos Santos Pereira, certify that: ******

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”) based on such evaluation; 

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 24, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp. (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Robert M. Doyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that based on my knowledge:

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   August 12, 2005 | /s/ Robert M. Doyle                                 Robert M. DoyleChief Financial OfficerCoinmach Service Corp. |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In the MATTER OF: Horace MEDLIN

No. COA17-784

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

AFFIRMED.
|   | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date: February 27, 2015 |                                |
|--------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                    |                                |   |   |
|   | By:                     | /s/ Antonio Carlos Valente da Silva |   |
|   |                    | Name:                               | Antonio Carlos Valente da Silva |   |
|   |                    | Title:                              | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
Susan Kay MEDLIN, Plaintiff, v. Randy Earl MEDLIN, Defendant.

No. COA17-425

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.