alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ DAVID GAODavid GaoChief Executive Officer
In the MATTER OF Jennifer Dawn LEDOUX.

S11Y0601

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: June 15, 2018

Per Curiam.

The Court having reviewed the Notice of Compliance submitted by the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia, and it appearing that Jennifer Dawn LeDoux has met the conditions for reinstatement as specified by this Court (see *In the Matter of Jennifer Dawn LeDoux*, 288 Ga. 777, 707 S.E.2d 88 (2011) ), it is hereby ordered that Jennifer Dawn LeDoux be reinstated to practice law in the State of Georgia.

*Reinstated.*

All the Justices concur.
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

 

 

	 
	
1








	





 

 

 

	 
	
2








	





 



 

	 
	
3








	





 

 

 

	 
	
4








	





 

 

 

	 
	
5








	





 



 

	 
	
6








	





 

 

 

	 
	
7








	





 

 

 

	 
	
8








	





 



 

	 
	
9








	





 

 

 

	 
	
10








	





 

 

 

	 
	
11








	





 

 

 

	 
	
12








	





 



 

	 
	
13








	





 

 

 

	 
	
14








	





 



 

	 
	
15








	





 



 

	 
	
16








	





 



 

 17
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Wiggins, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 558]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered February 5, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 11 to 22 years and 6 to 12 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Even if the court improperly permitted the complainant to testify as to her interpretation of certain language used by defendant in his letters to her from prison, the error was harmless. Similarly, if there was error in permitting the firearms expert to identify the type of pistol used in the incident and to demonstrate the operation of a sample of such a weapon, the error was harmless. The evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming.

The court properly admitted evidence of uncharged crimes committed by defendant against the complainant since it was probative of defendant’s motive and intent, was inextricably interwoven with the narrative of events and was necessary background to explain to the jury the relationship between defendant and the complainant *(see, People v Steinberg,*170 AD2d 50, 73, *affd*79 NY2d 673). Any prejudice to defendant was outweighed by the probative value of such testimony, and the court’s limiting instructions served to prevent any prejudice.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
# C_2014135EN.01001301.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku — Poland) — Małgorzata Nierodzik v Samodzielny Publiczny Psychiatryczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej im. dr. Stanisława Deresza w Choroszczy

(Case C-38/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Concept of ‘employment conditions’ - Notice period for the termination of a fixedterm employment contract - Difference in treatment between workers on contracts of indefinite duration))

2014/C 135/13

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Małgorzata Nierodzik

Applicant:

Defendant: Samodzielny Publiczny Psychiatryczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej im. dr. Stanisława Deresza w Choroszczy

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku — Interpretation of Article 1 of Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43), and of clauses 1 and 4 of the annex to that directive — Provisions of national law providing for less favourable periods of notice in fixed-term contracts than in open-ended contracts.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP must be interpreted as precluding a national rule, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that, for the termination of fixed-term contracts of more than six months, a fixed notice period of two weeks may be applied regardless of the length of service of the worker concerned, whereas the length of the notice period for contracts of indefinite duration is fixed in accordance with the length of service of the worker concerned and may vary from two weeks to three months, where those two categories of workers are in comparable situations.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.

1

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 11, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00474

- CV

Texas Star Disposals, LLC, Appellant

v.

Texas Railroad Commission and David H. Arrington Oil & Gas, Inc.,

n/k/a Fayetteville

- Floyd Oil & Gas, Inc., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on May 1, 2014. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen J. McDonnell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Holly Energy Partners, L.P;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report on Form10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 3, 2007 /s/ Stephen J. McDonnell   Stephen J. McDonnell   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30772 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERRENCE O. LAFAYETTE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-94-88-B

- - - - - - - - - - June 19, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Terrence O. Lafayette appeals his sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Lafayette challenges the district court's determination of the relevant quantity of drugs, argues that he was a minimal participant in the offense, and contends that the district court should have granted his motion for downward departure.No. 95-30772 -2- The district court did not clearly err in holding Lafayette responsible for the entire quantity of cocaine involved in the transaction or in finding that his role in the offense was not minimal. United States v. Hernandez-Coronado , 39 F.3d 573, 574 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994). We lack jurisdiction to consider Lafayette's argument concerning the denial of a downward departure because there is no indication that the district court's decision was based on legal error or a misapplication of the Guidelines. United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.00


                               RED ROOF INNS, INC.

                           ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Red Roof Inns,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and
appoints David N. Chichester and/or Alan L. Tallis, collectively and
individually, as his agent and attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and re-substitution, to (a) sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on
his behalf and in his name, place, and stead in any and all capacities with
respect to the registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d), (b) sign and file any and all amendments, including
post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K, (c) sign and file any and
all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission covered by the Form 10-K, and (d) do and perform any and all other
acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required in the premises; and
(2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant hereto
by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 16th day of March,1998.



                               /s/ JAMES M. ALLWIN
                               -----------------------------
                               James M. Allwin



                                       53
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19336]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Applications

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following applicants have applied for scientific research 
permits to conduct certain activities with endangered species pursuant 
to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended.

DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be received on or 
before October 28, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to the Chief, 
Endangered Species Division, Ecological Services, P.O. Box 1306, Room 
4102, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. Documents and other information 
submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to 
the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act. 
Documents will be available for public inspection, by appointment only, 
during normal business hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500 
Gold Ave. SW., Room 4102, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Please refer to the 
respective permit number for each application when submitting comments. 
All comments received, including names and addresses, will become part 
of the official administrative record and may be made available to the 
public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief, Endangered Species Division, 
(505) 248-6920.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Permit No. TE-676811

Applicant: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 2, Albuquerque, New 
Mexico.

    Applicant requests an amendment to the Regional Director's permit 
to add the following species: Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis 
roswellensis), Koster's springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), Noel's amphipod 
(Gammarus desperatus), and Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos) within New 
Mexico and Texas. The listed species will be effective September 8, 
2005.

Permit No. TE-109028

Applicant: Susan Courage, San Antonio, Texas.

    Applicant requests a new permit for research and recovery purposes 
to conduct presence/absence surveys for golden-cheeked warbler 
(Dendroica chrysoparia) and black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapillus) 
within Texas.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Larry G. Bell,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 05-19336 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
| Official Journalof the European Union | ISSN 1725-2423C 303**Volume 47****7 December 2004** |
| --- | --- |

Official Journalof the European Union

ISSN 1725-2423C 303**Volume 47****7 December 2004**

| English edition | | Information and notices | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| |
| Notice No | Contents | Page | |
| | | I *Information* | |
| | | **Court of Auditors** |
| 2004/C 303/01 | Special Report No 4/2004 on the programming of the Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation – Interreg III, together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

English edition

Information and notices

---

Notice No

Contents

Page

I *Information*

**Court of Auditors**

2004/C 303/01

Special Report No 4/2004 on the programming of the Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation – Interreg III, together with the Commission's replies

1

**EN**
In the Matter of: Q.W.

No. COA16-678

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
IN RE: E.D.

125PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2018

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for E.D.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 26th of June 2018 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of June 2018."

Petitioner shall have up to and including the 8th day of August 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AGREEMENT TO AMEND UNRESTRICTED AND OPEN
LINE OF CREDIT 


 


Agreement to Amend Unrestricted
and Open Line of Credit


Between


Flux Power Inc. and Esenjay
Investments 


 


This Amendment
(“Amendment”) for the Unrestricted and Open Line of Credit (“Open Line
Note”) by and between Flux Power Inc., ("Flux”, “Borrower”
and/or “Corporation") of which was effective as of September 24, 2012 and Esenjay Investments LLC,
("Purchaser") with a principal address in Corpus Christi, TX and shall be
effective on May 1st, 2014 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).


 


Whereas, the parties desire by this
Amendment to amend the Open Line Note. All references to articles and sections and use of defined terms
herein shall have the same meanings and effect as stated in the Open Line Note unless otherwise
stated in this Amendment.


 


AGREEMENT. The Parties agree to the following:


 


		1.	Amendment to Covenants. To amend the Covenants section to include an additional covenant.
The additional covenant shall may require, at Landor’s sole discretion, Borrower to provide evidence that secures the repayment
of any additional funds dispersed under this Open Line Note within ninety (90) days. The language below will replace the covenants
language in the Open Line Note in its entirety:



 


“Covenants: So
long as any principal, interest or other amount due hereunder shall remain unpaid under the Note, Borrower agrees to keep adequate
records and books of account, and shall provide Lender financial reports as reasonably requested by Lender.


 


Borrower further agrees to provide,
at Landor’s sole discretion and request, evidence, that secures the repayment of any additional funds dispersed under this
Open Line Note within ninety (90) days.”


 


IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
as of the Effective Date written above.


 


	Esenjay Investments LLC	 	Flux Power Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:	/s/ Howard Williams	 	Signature:	/s/ Chris Anthony
	 	Howard Williams, Treasurer	 	 	Chris Anthony, CEO
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	May 8, 2013	 	Date:	May 8, 2013
FELTON v. BUTLER, et al.

161P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

David Felton, for Felton, David.

*695The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of September 2017 by Plaintiff for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**

**HOMEBANC CORP.**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with HomeBanc Corp.’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Patrick S. Flood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

 
|               |   |                                   |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Date: May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/ PATRICK S. FLOOD                   |
|               |   | Patrick S. Flood                       |
|               |   | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |