Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices 779

Dated: December 29, 2004.

Barbara E. Tillman,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

[FR Doc. 05–194 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A–122–822

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain 

Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Canada

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Carey or Douglas Kirby, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–3964 and (202) 

482–3782, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department published the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat 

products (CORE) from Canada on 

August 19, 1993 (58 FR 44162). Based 

on timely requests, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Act, on September 

30, 2003, the Department initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CORE from 

Canada, covering the period August 1, 

2002, through July 31, 2003. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part 

and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 

68 FR 56262 (September 30, 2003). This 

administrative review was initiated on 

the following exporters: Continuous 

Colour Coat, Ltd. (‘‘CCC’’), Dofasco Inc. 

(‘‘Dofasco’’), Ideal Roofing Company, 

Ltd. (‘‘Ideal Roofing’’), Impact Steel 

Canada, Ltd. (‘‘Impact Steel’’), Russel 

Metals Export (‘‘Russel Metals’’), 

Sorevco and Company, Ltd. 

(‘‘Sorevco’’), and Stelco Inc. (‘‘Stelco’’). 

On December 19, 2003, the Department 

published a rescission, in part, of its 

administrative review with respect to 

CCC, Impact Steel, and Ideal Roofing. 

See Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel 

Flat Products From Canada: Rescission, 

in Part, of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 68 FR 70764 

(December 19, 2003). On March 30, 

2004, the Department published a 

rescission, in part, of its administrative 

review with respect to Russell Metals. 

See Notice of Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR 

16521 (March 30, 2004).

On April 29, 2004, the Department 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this antidumping 

duty administrative review from May 2, 

2004, until no later than August 30, 

2004. See Notice of Extension of Time 

Limit for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR 

23495 (April 29, 2004). On August 30, 

2004, the Department issued the 

preliminary results on CORE from 

Canada. See Certain Corrosion–Resistant 

Carbon Steel Flat Products from 

Canada: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 69 FR 555138 (September 13, 

2004) (Preliminary Results).

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

requires the Department to issue the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an 

antidumping duty order for which a 

review is requested and issue the final 

results within 120 days after the date on 

which the preliminary results are 

published. However, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend these deadlines to 

a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, 

respectively.

The Department recently received 

case briefs and rebuttal briefs from the 

interested parties involved in this 

administrative review. The Department 

has determined that it is not practicable 

to complete the review within the 

statutory time limit due to the need for 

analysis of certain complex issues, 

including the treatment of certain U.S. 

sales and considering whether the 

Department should accept certain 

‘‘surface type’’ product characteristics 

reported by Dofasco for purposes of the 

Department’s model match and cost 

reporting methodologies. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, the Department is extending the 

time limit for the final results from 

January 11, 2004, to no later than March 

14, 2005, which is the next business day 

since 180 days from the date of 

publication of the Preliminary Results

occurs on a weekend. This notice is 

issued and published in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 

section 351.213(h)(2) of the 

Department’s regulations.

Dated: December 28, 2004.

Barbara E. Tillman,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/

CVD Operations.

[FR Doc. 05–193 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.

SUMMARY: In November 2004, the 

Department of Commerce received three 

requests to conduct new shipper 

reviews of the antidumping duty order 

on fresh garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China. We have determined 

that these requests meet the statutory 

and regulatory requirements for the 

initiation of a new shipper review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sochieta Moth or Brian Ledgerwood at 

(202) 482–0168 and (202) 482–3836, 

respectively, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 8, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

The notice announcing the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) was published on November 16, 

1994. On November 22, 2004, we 

received a request for a new shipper 

review from Zhangqui Quingyuan 

Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Quingyuan). On 

November 30, 2004, we received 

requests for new shipper reviews from 

Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., 

Ltd. (Shanghai LJ) and Huaiyang 

Huamei Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Huamei). 

Qingyuan and Huamei certified that 

they both grew and exported the subject 

merchandise on which they based their 

requests for a new shipper review. 

Shanghai LJ certified that it exported the 

subject merchandise on which it based 

its request for a new shipper review, but 

that it did not grow the subject