alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Yukon Gold
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: December 15, 2008



/s/ J.L. Guerra, Jr.J.L. Guerra, Jr. Chief
Executive Officer Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc.



Dated: December 15, 2008



/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh Malhotra, C.A.,
Chief Financial Officer Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by
Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Sixth Appellate District

State of Texas

RODERICK BEHAM,

Appellant

v. NO. 06-14-00174-CR

 Trial Court #14 F 0004 005

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW Roderick Beham, Appellant, by and through his below

named Attorney and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby

requests an extension of the time period for the filing of the Appellant’s Brief

and in support of same would show the Court as follows:

I.

A. This case is pending from the 5th Judicial District Court of Bowie

County, Texas. The date of the Judgment is August 29, 2014, with

sentence being imposed by the trial court on August 29, 2014.

B. The case was styled, “State of Texas v. Roderick Beham., Cause No. 14

F 0004-005.

C. Appellant was convicted of the offense of Aggravated Robbery.

ACCEPTED

06-14-00174-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

3/27/2015 4:04:23 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/27/2015 4:04:23 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
D. Punishment was assessed by the jury to 25 years in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

E. The Appellant’s Brief is due to be filed March 30, 2015.

F. Appellant requests an extension of the filing of Appellant’s Brief for

Forty-Five (45) days, making the Appellant’s Brief due on May 14, 2015.

G. Appellant’s attorney has been diligent in researching and preparing the

Appellant’s brief for the Court however, due to counsel’s preparation in

a criminal jury trial styled the State of Arkansas v. Tim Howard, in the

Circuit Court of Little River County, Arkansas, since being appointed to

represent Appellant, counsel has had insufficient time to complete

Appellant’s brief.

H. There have been no previous requests for extensions in this cause.

I. Counsel for Appellant has contacted the Assistant Criminal District

Attorney for Bowie County, Texas, who is assigned to this matter and

she has no objection to the request of the Appellant.

II.

Appellant’s attorney has been diligent in pursuing this appeal and is not

seeking this extension for the purpose of delay.

2
PRAYER

WHEREFORE, on the basis of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

Appellant’s attorney respectfully requests this Court to grant the Motion for

Extension of Time for the filing of Appellant’s Brief.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/Alwin A. Smith 

Alwin A. Smith

TBN: 18532200

al@alwinsmith.com

602 Pine Street

Texarkana, Texas 75501

903/792-1608

903/792-0899 Fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief has been forwarded to

Ms. Samantha Oglesby, 601 Main Street, Texarkana, Texas, on this the

_27th__ day of March 2015.

/s/Alwin A. Smith 

Alwin A. Smith

3
#### Christopher Lee COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-1318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 21, 2003.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing. *See Lawson v. State, 845*So.2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); *Thomas v. State, 825*So.2d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

BOOTH, DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1998]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Office of Research and Development; Government Owned Invention 
Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of Research and Development.

ACTION: Notice of Government owned invention available for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as 
represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for 
licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or 
CRADA Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious 
commercialization of results of federally funded research and 
development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend 
market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for 
licensing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on 
the invention may be obtained by writing to: Sal Sheredos, Department 
of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer Program, 
Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0473; e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b6a4a9a0a0a885b3a4b7a1ebaab7a2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fecfef3fafaf2dfe9feedfbb1f0edf8">[email protected]</span></a>. Any request 
for information should include the Number and Title for the relevant 
invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the 
Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, 
DC 20231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention available for licensing is:

U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/580,727 ``Surgically 
Implantable Perineal Urinary Incontinence Device''

    Dated: January 26, 2005.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05-1998 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PETER D. MELCHIORRE,

Petitioner

v.

422 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PHOENIXVILLE TOWN CENTER, LP, LONGVIEW DEVELOPMENT, LP, GIANT LANDLORD, LP, SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., K MART CORPORATION, GIANT

FOOD STORES, INC., HARDWARE LANDLORD GP, LLC AND PHOENIXVILLE BOROUGH,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 849 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of May, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
(tftmri at Appeals

mttl| Ststrtct at ftexns at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DARRELL WAYNE PHILLIPS, Appeal from the 292nd District.Courtof

lant Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F92-

PP 41539-JV).

No. 05-92-01935-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Opinion delivered per curiam, before

Justices Lagarde, Chapman, and James.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 28, 1995.

TOM JAME

JUSTICE
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed February 28, 1995

In The

(tart of Appeals

mtttf Ststrtrt of Okxas at laitas

No. 05-92-01935-CR

DARRELL WAYNE PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F92-41539-JV

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Justices Lagarde, Chapman, and James

Darrell Wayne Phillips appeals his conviction for burglary of avehicle. Appellant

pleaded guilty to the offense alleged in the indictment without the benefit of aplea bargain

agreement on punishment. Appellant also pleaded true to the enhancement paragraphs.

The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed a thirty-five-year sentence. i

Appellant's attorney filed abrief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements ofAnders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents aprofessional evaluation of the record showing why,
in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel. deUvered a copy of the brief to appeUant.

We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se brief. AppeUant did not file a pro se

brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We have also considered the motion of appeUant's counsel to withdraw. We grant

the motion to withdraw. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W,2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 90

921935F.U05

-2-
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2018

Ms. Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, for Walters, Christina Shea

Mr. Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Durham, Attorney at Law, for Walters, Christina Shea

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Raleigh, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. James E. Williams, Jr., Carrboro, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Mr. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller

Mr. Grady Jessup, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Black Lawyers

Ms. Lisa A. Bakale-Wise, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Irving Joyner, Durham, Attorney at Law, for N.C. State Conference of the NAACP

Mr. Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Social Scientists

Ms. Janet Moore, Attorney at Law, for National Association for Public Defense

Mr. Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Attorney at Law, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Ms. Jin Hee Lee, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Mr. W. Kerrel Murray, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.

Ms. Cynthia F. Adcock, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Council of Churches

Mr. Burton Craige, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

Mr. Jeremy M. Falcone, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Former State and Federal Prosecutors

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State *383The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to admit W. Kerrel Murray Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# E2003C0306(01)

**Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 and 63 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(1) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement — EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures***Official Journal C 052 , 06/03/2003 P. 0016 - 0016*

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 and 63 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(1) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

(2003/C 52/09)

Date of adoption: 25.9.2002

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 95-010

Title: To propose appropriate measures to Norway with regard to State aid in the form of regionally differentiated social security taxation (Geografisk differensiert arbeidsgiveravgift)

Objective: Regional development

Legal basis: Act relating to national insurance (Lov om folketrygd av 17.6.1966, No 12)

Budget: Unspecified

Aid intensity: Norway is divided into five geographical zones with differentiated social security taxation (Zone 1: 14,1 %, Zone 2: 10,6 %, Zone 3: 6,4 %, Zone 4: 5,1 %, Zone 5: 0,0 %)

Duration: Until 1.1.2004

Other information: The appropriate measures, as accepted by the Norwegian authorities by letter dated 25.10.2002, are as follows:

(a) The Norwegian authorities shall take any legislative, administrative and other measures necessary to eliminate any State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) EEA resulting from the system of regionally differentiated social security tax, or to render such aid compatible with Article 61 of the EEA Agreement,

(b) The Norwegian authorities shall eliminate any such aid or render it compatible with effect from 1.1.2004 unless the Authority agrees to a later date should that be considered objectively necessary and justified by the Authority in order to allow an appropriate transition for the undertakings in question to the adjusted situation; and

(c) The Norwegian authorities shall communicate to the Authority the relevant measures adjusting the aid scheme as soon as possible and in any event no later than 25 March 2003.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int
#### Robert Scaglione, Respondent, v Riverbay Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[719 NYS2d 37]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about November 1, 1999, insofar as it denied defendant Riverbay Corporation’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law claims. As we have previously held, the changing of an elevator cable, in the absence of any proof that the elevator was inoperable, does not constitute a repair within the contemplation of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) *(Molloy v 750 7th Ave. Assocs.,*256 AD2d 61; *see also, Papapietro v Rock-Time,*265 AD2d 174; *Carr v Jacob Perl Assocs.,*201 AD2d 296; *Wilson v City of New York,*903 F Supp 553, *affd*89 F3d 32). The fact that maintenance on the cable may have been warranted because it showed signs of wear *255does not alter this conclusion *(id.).*Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Lerner, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6237

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DURRELL TOPPIN, a/k/a Smiles,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Durrell Toppin, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, 

Michael Edward Rich, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jessica 

R. Hertz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Durrell Toppin appeals the district court’s order 

construing his motion as seeking relief under 18 U.S.C. § 

3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying the motion. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Toppin, No. 1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. NOO 178-04-D-4072 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60745 

Craig A. Holman, Esq. 

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Kara M. Klaas, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 8 June 2017 

DA YID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60745, Appeal of Systems 

Application & Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Curtis W. Mewbourne        
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer   
|                        |  |  |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/ Diana M. Laing                    
|                       |  | Diana M. Laing Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 2.4
                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER

                                      OF

                           MIDWAY-CTS BUFFALO, LTD.

                                     INTO

                     COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 905 OF THE BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW


     We, the undersigned, being respectively the President and Secretary of
Coyne International Enterprises Corp., the surviving corporation, certify that
the plan of merger has been adopted by the Board of Directors of the surviving
corporation.

     1.   The name of the surviving corporation is Coyne International
Enterprises Corp. Its Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the Department
of State of New York on June 23, 1961.

     2.   The name of the subsidiary corporation is Midway-CTS Buffalo, LTD., a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York. Its Certificate
of Incorporation was filed by the Department of State of New York on October 3,
1994.

     3.   The designation and number of outstanding shares of the subsidiary
corporation to be merged, and the number of each such class owned by the
surviving corporation, are as follows:

SUBSIDIARY         DESIGNATION AND NUMBER      NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED
                   OF OUTSTANDING SHARES       BY COYNE INTERNATIONAL
                                               ENTERPRISES CORP.


1. Midway-CTS      Common Stock                1,000 - nonvoting shares
   Buffalo, LTD.   1,000 - nonvoting shares      100 - voting shares
                     100 - voting shares


                                  Page 1 of 2
<PAGE>

     4.   The manner and basis for converting the shares of the subsidiary into
shares of the surviving corporation shall be as follows: any and all shares of
common stock of Midway-CTS Buffalo, LTD. shall be surrendered to the surviving
corporation for cancellation, and no shares of the surviving corporation shall
be issued.

     5.   The merger shall be effective as of the date of the filing of this
Certificate by the Department of State of New York.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have signed this Certificate on October 27, 1999,
and affirm the truth of its contents under penalty of perjury.


                              COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP.
                              d/b/a Coyne Textile Services

                              By:      /s/ Thomas M. Coyne
                                   --------------------------------
                                       Thomas M. Coyne
                                       President


                                       /s/ Alexander Pobedinsky
                                   --------------------------------
                                       Alexander Pobedinsky
                                       Secretary

                             Page 2 of 2