alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Metro OneTelecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy A. Timmins, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Dale N. Wahl, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Timothy A. Timmins     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy  A. Timmins         |
|   | President,  Chief Executive |
|   | Officer  and Director       |
|   |                        |
|   | /s/  Dale N. Wahl           |   |
|   | Dale N. Wahl                |
|   | Senior Vice  President,     |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer    |

March 28, 2003

----
Larry Furro w and Keller

Williams Legacy



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00074

- CV

Stacey SCOTT

, Appellant

v.

Larry FURROW and Keller Williams Legacy Group,

Appellee s

From the 25th Judicial District Court , Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 1125

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to January 5, 2016.

I t is so ORDERED on December 23, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________________ ___

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Lewis Edward PERSON

No. 264P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Lewis E. Person, for Person, Lewis Edward.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd of August 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of August 2017 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
#### In the Matter of City of Yonkers, Respondent, v Zarin Realty Company, L. L. C., et al., Appellants.

[719 NYS2d 870]

*628In a condemnation proceeding, the condemnees Zarin Realty Company, L. L. C., Gail Lewis, Citytrust, Midstates Resources Corp., and Gill Mechanical Co., Inc., appeal from (1) a corrected order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered December 23, 1999, which, upon an order denying the motion of Zarin Realty Company, L. L. C., in effect, to vacate its default in appearing for trial and to restore the case to the trial calendar, dismissed its claim for additional compensation, and (2) an order of the same court entered December 2, 1999, which denied the motion of Zarin Realty Company, L. L. C., for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered December 2, 1999, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal by Gail Lewis, Citytrust, Midstates Resources Corp., and Gill Mechanical Co., Inc., from the corrected order entered December 23, 1999, is dismissed, as those appellants are not aggrieved thereby *(see,*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the corrected order entered December 23, 1999, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellants.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Zarin Realty Company, L. L. C. (hereinafter Zarin), in effect, to vacate its default in appearing for trial and to restore the case to the trial calendar. The papers submitted in support of Zarin’s motion were insufficient to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious claim *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a]; *Swedish v Bourie,*233 AD2d 495; *Martinez v Otis El. Co.,*213 AD2d 523; *cf., Incanno v Sparacio,*269 AD2d 497; *Bank of N. Y. v Spiro,*267 AD2d 339, 340). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 



 
 March 6, 2013 
 Kurt Ekert 
 Chief Commercial Officer 
 Travelport GDS 
 Dear Kurt: 
 This letter agreement (“Letter Agreement”) will amend the October 21, 2011 employment agreement between you and Travelport, LP, as previously amended by the November 23, 2011 letter
agreement (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement. 
 The Employment Agreement is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 7(c)(iii)(C)(x), as well as the corresponding section (entitled “Severance Pay”) on page 9 of the General Release, is amended by deleting the
phrase “one (1) times the Base Salary” and replacing it with “two (2) times the Base Salary”. 


Except as expressly set forth above, these amendments take effect upon the parties’ execution of this Letter Agreement. Except as expressly amended
herein, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect as written. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing
below. 
 Very truly yours, 
 /s/
Gordon Wilson 
 Gordon Wilson 

President and CEO 
 Travelport, LP 

By Travelport Holdings, LLC, 
 as General Partner

 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: 
  

	
	/s/ Kurt Ekert
	Kurt Ekert
	
	March 11, 2013
	Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*James Raymondi, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

July 12, 1943.

Defendant in person.

*Thomas Gradoch Hughes, Acting District Attorney (Frank DiLdlla*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Leibowitz, J.

The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and sentenced as a fourth felony offender to a term of forty years to life.

He filed a notice of appeal and thereafter moved in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for an order dispensing with the printing of the record on appeal. This motion was denied on April 5, 1943, and the court directed that the appeal be placed on the calendar for October 18, 1943, for argument.

He now moves in this court for an order directing that the clerk of this court furnish him, gratis, with a transcript of the trial minutes.

This motion must be denied. This court is without power to furnish to a defendant, gratis, a transcript of the minutes of trial, after trial, except in cases where the judgment is of death or of life imprisonment following a recommendation of a jury pursuant to section 1045-a of the Penal Law (Code Crim. Pro. §§ 308, 485.)

Motion denied
Raymond Alan GRIFFIN v. Deborah SHANDLES, Assistant District Attorney of Wake County and Paul C. Ridgeway, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge v. John and Jane Doe and Raymond Alan Griffin v. Deborah Shandles, Assistant District Attorney of Wake County and Donald W. Stephens, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge v. John and Jane Doe

No. 322P15-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2017

*269Raymond Alan Griffin, for Griffin, Raymond Alan.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of December 2017 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 20th of December 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 20th of December 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2017."
# C_2021371EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2020-2021 SESSION

Sittings of 8 to 10 July 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sitting of 23 July 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodolfo Prieto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Rodolfo Prieto     
|Rodolfo Prieto         
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 8, 2004
# Official Journal C 390/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 390 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6017 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 390

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6017 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2017/C 390/01 | Position (EU) No 6/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 Adopted by the Council on 17 October 2017 | 1 |
| 2017/C 390/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 6/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 | 25 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2017/C 390/01

Position (EU) No 6/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 Adopted by the Council on 17 October 2017

1

2017/C 390/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 6/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008

25

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of WLG Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Christopher Wood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
David L. Koontz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report on Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





This certificate is being made for the
exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any
person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.





Date: May 14, 2009




By:
            /s/ Christopher
      Wood
            
            By:
            /s/ David
      KoontzName: Christopher
      Wood
            
            
            Name: David
      KoontzTitle: Chief Executive
      Officer
              (Principal Executive
      Officer)
            
            
            Title: Chief Financial
      Officer
              (Principal Financial
      and
              Accounting
      Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO GONZALEZ ZAMUDIO,

AKA Francisco Gonzalez Zamudio, AKA

Francisco Zamudio Gonzalez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72319

Agency No. A037-442-070

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Gonzalez Zamudio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration

judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de

FILED

JAN 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
novo constitutional challenges and questions of law. Padilla-Martinez v. Holder,

770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

The agency correctly determined that the record establishes that Zamudio

was convicted under California Health and Safety Code § 11378, for possession for

purpose of sale of methamphetamine, which constitutes a controlled substance

violation under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) that renders him removable. See

Padilla-Martinez, 770 F.3d at 831 n.3; Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1189

(9th Cir. 2011) (stating that methamphetamine is a federally-controlled substance). 

The plea form specifies both the controlled substance involved and the count in the

charging document that also names the controlled substance. See Murillo-Prado v.

Holder, 735 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, Zamudio’s claims that

his due process rights were violated because the record documents allegedly did

not establish removability fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.

2000) (to prevail on a due process challenge, an alien must show error and

prejudice). In addition, the use of the June date on the Notice to Appear did not

deprive Zamudio of a full and fair hearing. See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d

1092, 1095 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[d]ue process is satisfied only by a full and fair

hearing”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-72319
NO. 07-10-0050-CV 

 

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 AT AMARILLO 

 PANEL B 

 JUNE 7, 2010 

 ______________________________ 

 Estate of CAROL REE STAHL, Deceased 

_________________________________ 

 FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF RANDALL COUNTY; 

 NO. 2002-303-P; HONORABLE RONNIE WALKER, PRESIDING 

 _______________________________ 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

 _______________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss. Without passing on the merits of the 

case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and 

dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 In May 2012, our board of directors formed a special committee, composed entirely of all of our independent directors, pursuant to which we have paid the chair of the committee (Mr. Sullivan) $20,000 per
month and each other member $10,000 per month since such date of formation.
Ruqaiya AMIR, Plaintiff, v. Syed J. AMIR, Defendant.

No. COA17-431

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART.
IN RE SOUTHEASTERN EYE CENTER-PENDING MATTERS

In re Southeastern Eye Center-Judgments

No. 168A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

*ORDER*

Appellant has failed to demonstrate grounds for appellate review under N.C.G.S. 7A-27(a)(3) (2017). The appeal in this matter is therefore dismissed.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 1st day of March, 2018.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/
      Howard Thomson   
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| |        | Chief Executive Officer and
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | February 14, 2011          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120692),2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150737),3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782),4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211),5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282),7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592), and8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571);
f8k073014ex10i_cachet.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Commitment Letter







This Commitment Letter (“Agreement”), dated as of 30th day of July, 2014, is entered into by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), and Jim Davis, an individual resident of the State of Florida, and Mike Hanson an individual resident of the State of Minnesota (“Lenders”).







Introduction







Borrower desires to obtain a commitment from Lender to provide funds, if necessary, for the continued operation of Borrower’s business.  Lenders are willing to provide funds of up to $2,500,000 to Borrower as of the effectiveness date of this agreement through December 31, 2014 in accordance with the terms set forth below.







Agreement







Now, Therefore, for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:








	
1)  

	
Lenders agree to make up to $2,500,000 available to Borrower until 12/31/14.













	
2)  

	
Borrower agrees that it shall use the funds provided hereunder for working capital to ensure the continued operation of its business.







 



	
3)  

	
Lenders agree that Borrower may access such funds at any time prior to 12/31/14 upon request to Lender.







 



	
4)  

	
The parties agree that promissory notes shall be entered into for each advance of funds by Borrower and such notes will be subordinate to all existing promissory notes.  Each promissory note shall bear simple interest at a rate of 10% beginning from the date of advance.  The parties agree that the principal and interest of each such promissory note shall become due on 1/31/15.  If the promissory notes are not repaid by 1/31/15, the default interest rate adjusts to 18%.







 



	
5)  

	
Lenders agree there shall be no financial covenants or restrictions on the funds provided hereunder.












In Witness Whereof, this Commitment Letter has been duly executed as of the date first written above.


 




	Borrower:   	 	Lenders:
	 	 	 	 
	Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.	 	/s/ James L. Davis
	 	 	 	 
	By: 	
/s/ Jeffrey C. Mack 

	 	
/s/ Michael J. Hanson


	Its: 	
Chief Executive Officer