alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the first meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

October 7th, 2005 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Ave., Southwest, Washington, DC 20201), conference room 705A.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with GSA regulations implementing the Federal Advisory Committee Act, ONC intends to publish a                     **Federal Register**                     meeting announcement at least 15 calendar days before the date of an American Health Information Community meeting for all dates in the future. The GSA regulations, however, also provide that an agency may give less than 15 days notice if the reasons for doing so are included in the                     **Federal Register**                     meeting notice. Due to the recent events in the gulf coast and the Department of Health and Human Services and Office of the National Coordinator's response to hurricane Katrina it has not been possible for ONC to announce the date and location of the first AHIC meeting before today. It should also be noted that the following meeting may be postponed if DHHS and ONC are involved in a response to hurricane Rita.                

                    The URL for the webcast of the first AHIC meeting has not yet been established and will be announced on the ONC Web site                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit*                     before the scheduled date above.                

Dated: September 23, 2005.

Dana Haza,

Acting Director of the Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 05-19452 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-P
##### 



Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
To Fixed Charges
 Nine MonthsEnded
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,September 30, 2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Earnings:Net income
    
    $
    19,659
    
    
    $
    32,494
    
    
    $
    581
    
    
    $
    2,670
    
    
    $
    2,423
    
    
    $
    2,100Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
    
    
    458
    
    
    
    1,994
    
    
    
    758
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Income from equity investee
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (894
    )
    
    
    (2,737
    )
    
    
    (2,284
    )
    
    
    (1,010
    )20,117
    
    
    
    34,488
    
    
    
    445
    
    
    
    (67
    )
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    1,090Add:Total fixed charges (per below)
    
    
    7,760
    
    
    
    2,279
    
    
    
    1,665
    
    
    
    1,657
    
    
    
    1,625
    
    
    
    1,625Distributed income of equity investee
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,487
    
    
    
    1,243
    
    
    
    1,650Total earnings
    
    $
    27,877
    
    
    $
    36,767
    
    
    $
    2,110
    
    
    $
    4,077
    
    
    $
    3,007
    
    
    $
    4,365Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    6,521
    
    
    $
    697
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Estimate of interest within rental expense(1)
    
    
    1,239
    
    
    
    1,582
    
    
    
    1,665
    
    
    
    1,657
    
    
    
    1,625
    
    
    
    1,625Total fixed charges
    
    $
    7,760
    
    
    $
    2,279
    
    
    $
    1,665
    
    
    $
    1,657
    
    
    $
    1,625
    
    
    $
    1,625Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.59
    
    
    
    16.13
    
    
    
    1.27
    
    
    
    2.46
    
    
    
    1.85
    
    
    
    2.69
 
 (1)
    
    Represents 30% of the total operating lease rental expense which is that portion deemed to
be interest.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4482 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and Technology 

account of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and 

Technology account of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING PROHIBITION. 

4 No funds are authorized to be appropriated for the 

5 Science and Technology account of the Environmental 

6 Protection Agency. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
  

	To:	Horizon Pharma AG 


Kägenstrasse 17 
 CH-4153 Reinach 
 Switzerland 

Mundipharma Medical Company 
 Mundipharma House, 5th Floor 
 14 Par-la-Ville Road 

PO Box HM 2332 

Hamilton, HM JX Bermuda 
 17th October 2012 
 Dear Sirs 
 Please sign where indicated below to accept the following amendment to the Second Letter Agreement dated 6th October 2011 between Mundipharma International Corporation Limited, Mundipharma Medical
Company and Horizon Pharma AG. 
 PMR Study 
 Mundipharma’s requirement to initiate dosing of first patient in the PMR Study as set out in the First Letter Agreement between the parties shall be amended to “initiate submission for
regulatory and ethics approval prior to
December 31st, 2012”. 

 

									
	 Yours faithfully

Mundipharma International Corporation Limited
	  		  		  	
					
	By:	  	 /s/ Douglas Docherty
	  		  		  	
					
	Name:	  	 Douglas Docherty
	  		  		  	
					
	Title:	  	 General Manager
	  		  		  	

 Agreed to and accepted as of the date first set forth above: 

 

									
	Horizon Pharma AG	  		  	Horizon Pharma AG
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Timothy P. Walbert
	  		  	By:	  	 /s/ Robert W. Metz

					
	Name:	 	 Timothy P. Walbert
	  		  	Name:	  	 Robert W. Metz

					
	Title:	 	 Chairman, President, CEO
	  		  	Title:	  	 SVP Global Business Ops, Chief Compliance Officer


  

									
	Mundipharma Medical Company	  		  		  	
					
	By:	  	 /s/ Douglas Docherty
	  		  		  	
					
	Name:	  	 Douglas Docherty
	  		  		  	
					
	Title:	  	 General Manager
	  		  		  	

 MUNDIPHARMA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION LIMITED 

Mundipharma House -14, Par-la-Ville Road - P.O. Box HM 2332 - Hamilton HM JX -Bermuda 

Tel: (441) 295-6480 - Fax: (441) 292-1472 
 a member of the Mundipharma International Group
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40101

Summary Calendar

JENNIFER WOMACK

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GALVESTON HOUSING AUTHORITY; CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES

STATE OF TEXAS, (Certain Employees); GALVESTON INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CV-707

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jennifer Womack has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)

in this appeal from the dismissal of her complaint against Galveston Housing

Authority (GHA), in which she alleged, inter alia, that GHA wrongfully

terminated her status as a Section 8 tenant. Womack has also moved for leave

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 23, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40101

2

to obtain transcripts at the Government’s expense and for the appointment of

counsel on appeal.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,

if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice

of appeal in a civil case is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Bowles v. Russell, 127

S. Ct. 2360, 2366 (2007). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A) requires

that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the

judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.

The final judgment dismissing Womack’s complaint was entered on

December 26, 2007. To be timely, Womack’s notice of appeal should have been

filed no later than Friday, January 25, 2008, but it was not filed until the

following Monday, January 28, 2008. She contends that the judgment was sent

to her on January 3, 2008; however, it is the date of the entry of judgment and

not the date of receipt that controls. See Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 987

F.2d 1199, 1201 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Birl v. Estelle, 660 F.2d 592, 593 (5th

Cir. 1981). Thus, Womack’s appeal is untimely, and this court lacks jurisdiction

to entertain any challenge to the district court’s dismissal of her complaint.

Accordingly, Womack’s appeal is DISMISSED, and her motions for leave

to proceed IFPon appeal,to obtain transcripts atthe Government’s expense, and

to be appointed counsel on appeal are DENIED.
Exhibit 10.2


 


NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF MODIFICATION


TO PAYMENT SCHEDULE


 


The Director of the Department of Development
of the State of Ohio, now known as the Ohio Development Services Agency (the “Director”) and Intellinetics, Inc. (the
“Borrower”) entered into a Loan Agreement dated June 3, 2011, in the original principal amount of $750,000.00 evidenced
by a Cognovit Promissory Note dated June 3, 2011 (the “Note”).


 


The parties agree that the Loan Agreement
is hereby amended to authorize the Director to modify the amortization schedule from time to time, setting forth the amount of
principal, interest and service fee payable under the Note. Pursuant to the Company’s request, the Director has modified
the payment schedule pursuant to the amortization schedule noted as Amortization Schedule #3, which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A (the “Revised Schedule”). The Borrower agrees that this Revised Schedule shall supersede all prior amortization schedules,
whether in the Note or in an attachment to the Note, and the undersigned Company acknowledges and authorizes the Director to update
the schedule as an attachment to the Note. All other terms of the Note remain unchanged.


 





	 	BORROWER:
	 	 
	 	Intellinetics, Inc.,
	 	an Ohio corporation
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Matthew L. Chretien
	 	 
	 	Print: /s/ Matthew L. Chretien
	 	 
	 	Date:  3/12/2013







 









    	 



    	 



    




 


Exhibit A


 


Summary of Amortization Schedule #3


 


 


Effective March 12, 2013, Intellinetics and the Ohio State Development
Authority entered into a Notice and Acknowledgement of Modification to Payment Schedule (the “March 12, 2013 Modification
#2”) relating to the June 3, 2011 note payable issued by Intellinetics to the Ohio State Development Authority in the amount
of $750,000.00. Pursuant to the March 12, 2013 Modification #2, the Ohio State Development Authority deferred principal and interest
payment until December 31, 2013, with the next principal and interest payment due on January 1, 2014.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 451 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Richard 

K. Salick Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2013 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Richard K. Salick Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RICHARD K. SALICK POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 500 North Brevard Avenue in 

6 Cocoa Beach, Florida, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Richard K. Salick Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 451 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard K. Salick 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robert D. Heuchan,
Chief Executive  Officer of Third Century,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          Third Century Bancorp.




/s/ Robert D. Heuchan
-----------------------------------
Robert D. Heuchan
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 11, 2004


The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
#### ENVIROTECH, INC., et al., Appellants, v. GATEWAY HOTEL PARTNERS, L.L.C., et al., Respondents.

No. ED 81543.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 29, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 19, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

John J. Davidson, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.

Bernard L. Batkin, Keith E. Witten, Kansas City, MO, for respondents.

Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Enviroteeh, Inc., Joel LaRose, Karen LaRose, and Papin Street Holdings, L.L.C. (collectively “Subcontractor”) appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying a motion to stay a counterclaim filed by Cumberland Casualty and Surety Company (“Surety”) and to compel arbitration. Because we find that there was no agreement between Subcontractor and Surety to arbitrate the disputes raised in the counterclaim, we find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00243-CV

THE LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS HUNSBERGER,

Appellant

v.

PHYSICIAN LIFE CARE PLANNING, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV04283

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED July 21, 2021.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1398. ALDEN B. THOMAS v. THE STATE.

In November 2013, a jury found Alden B. Thomas guilty of rape. Thomas’s

conviction was affirmed on appeal. See Case No. A20A0784 (decided Sept. 4, 2020). 

In November 2021, Thomas filed a pro se “Motion to Vacate a Void, Illegal, and

Unconstitutional Sentence.” The trial court subsequently granted Thomas’s motion

for the limited purpose of re-sentencing pursuant Upton v. State, 350 Ga. App. 535,

539-540 (3) (829 SE2d 791) (2019). In February 2022, counsel was appointed to

represent Thomas at the re-sentencing hearing. On March 9, 2022, after the hearing,

the trial court re-sentenced Thomas. On April 7, 2022, Thomas filed a pro se notice

of appeal from the amended sentence. 

“A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself

and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are

therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3)

(767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted). Here, the record showsthat Thomas was

represented by counsel at his re-sentencing hearing, and nothing in the record

indicates that the attorney who represented him at that time either withdrew or was

relieved from representing Thomas. See White v. State, 302 Ga. 315, 318 (2) (806

SE2d 489) (2017) (rejecting defendant’s argument that representation terminates

upon entry of judgment and sentence and holding that it continuesfor at least 30 days

after entry of judgment). Under these circumstances,Thomas’s pro se notice of appeal

is a legal nullity. See Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403, 405 (812 SE2d 800)

(2018). 

June 28, 2022
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/28/2022
Christian G. PLASMAN, in his individual capacity and derivatively for the benefit of, ON BEHALF OF and right of nominal party BOLIER & COMPANY, LLC v. DECCA FURNITURE (USA), INC., Decca Contract Furniture, LLC, Richard Herbst, Wai Theng Tin, Tsang C. Hung, Decca Furniture, Ltd., Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC, Dongguan Decca Furniture Co. Ltd., Darren Hudgins, Decca Home, LLC, and Elan by Decca, LLC and Bolier & Company, LLC, Nominal Defendant v. Christian J. Plasman a/k/a Barrett Plasman, Third-Party Defendant

No. 209P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Matthew K. Rogers, Attorney at Law, Hickory, for Plasman, Christian G., et al.

Robert A. Muckenfuss, Attorney at Law, Jodie H. Lawson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., et al.

Andrew D. Atkins, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

Robert A. Muckenfuss, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of June 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*850"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 20th of June 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
of Pure Biofuels Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      November 12, 2010/s/
      Carlos Alberto PintoCarlos
      Alberto Pinto, Chief Executive
Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 45
STATE of North Carolina v. James Daniel SIMMONS, Defendant.

No. COA17-952

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.