alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 286A/30 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6030 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6030 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 286 A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), Ljubljana (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2017/20022 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2017/C 286 A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), Ljubljana (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2017/20022

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Powell v. State of NC

260P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Archie David Powell, Jr., for Powell, Archie David (Jr.)

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of November 2016 by Plaintiff for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
STATE of North Carolina v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

No. 130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Durham, James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th of May 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
# C_2011113EN.01002002.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/20

---

Order of the General Court of 4 February 2011 — Chi Mei Optoelectronics Europe and Chi Mei Optoelectronics v Commission

(Case T-140/07) (1)

1

2011/C 113/40

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber (extended composition) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.

1

---
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the matter of the Robinson * From the 118th District

Family Entities, Court of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 48,534

.

No. 11

- 12

- 00258

- CV * August 29 , 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Bailey, J. , and McCall, sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not par ticipating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes tha t there is

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court's opinion, the

order of the trial court is reversed, and the injunction is dissolved. This cause is

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s

opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this app e al are taxed against the

Robinson Family Entities

– Geneva Legg, receiver.
Opinion issued April 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-01077-CR

———————————

MARCUS ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1574031

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marcus Robinson, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of assault 

against a peace officer.

1

 The trial court found appellant guilty, and, in accordance 

 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.01.
2

with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced 

appellant to twelve years in prison. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We 

dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports 

the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. 

See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of 

appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who pleabargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal 

without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL

 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF 

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

No. 12-90155

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant alleges that a district judge improperly delegated the judicial

power to a deputy clerk in his civil case. Complainant points to an order to show

cause, which lists a variety of jurisdictional defects, some of which are marked

with a check mark, and others which are not. The form also contains a narrative

explanation of the defect and has “Deputy Clerk” typed in the signature line. 

Complainant infers that the order must have been issued by the deputy clerk

without specific directions from the judge.

“[J]udges can have assistants who are not themselves judges” and those

assistants may “advise and assist the real judge.” Geras v. Lafayette Display

Fixtures, Inc., 742 F.2d 1037, 1046–47 (7th Cir. 1984) (Posner, J., dissenting). 

Judges are free to give such assistants specific or general instructions and trust the

assistants to perform the functions they’ve been assigned. For example, it is not an

FILED

MAY 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
impermissible delegation of judicial authority for the judge not to draft every word

of an order or not to cite-check his own opinions. The key is that the subordinate

is acting pursuant to instructions from, and under the supervision of, the judge, and

that the judge exercises authority over the substantive disposition of the matters

presented to him.

The order that the district court employed to help screen out jurisdictional

defects early is not objectionable, even if the deputy clerk exercises some

independent discretion in determining whether there is a likely deficiency. So long

as the form is approved and adopted by the judge, and the deputy clerk is trained

and supervised, the function of detecting possible defects in pleadings is

sufficiently ministerial that it does not implicate the judicial function. 

The clerk here did little more than point out possible problems to the parties,

and give the party who may have committed the transgression an opportunity to

explain why the perceived problem didn’t exist, or correct the problem. The

ultimate decision as to whether the pleading is defective, and what action to take if

the defect is not corrected, was retained by the judge. Even assuming, then, that

the deputy clerk acted on his own in filling out and filing the order to show

cause—and there is no evidence that he did—this does not amount to misconduct. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(iii); Judicial-Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(A), (D).

DISMISSED.
# C_2010080EN.01002502.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/25

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 February 2010 — Portugal v Transnáutica and Commission

(Case T-385/05 TO R)

(Interim measures - Customs union - Third-party proceedings - Judgment of the General Court - Application for stay of execution - Failure to have regard to formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 80/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Third party: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, A.C. Santos, J. Gomes and P. Rocha, Agents)

Third party:

Other parties to the proceedings: Transnáutica — Transportes e Navegação, SA (Matosinhos, Portugal) (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién and D. Ortigão Ramos, lawyers); and European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Bouyon, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Application for stay of execution, in third-party proceedings, of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009Transnáutica v Commission (Case T-385/05, not published in the ECR).

Transnáutica

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2004/C 115/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136587 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136587 

 COA: 282094 

Wayne CC: 02-008563-01

KEITH ANTONIO FINLEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CFO OF PERIODIC REPORT The undersigned, Timothy A. Bienek, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    the Interim Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Dated: May 16, 2005 /s/ Timothy A. BienekTimothy A. BienekExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
      of Pure Biofuels Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:November
                13, 2008/s/
                Luis GoyzuetaLuis
                Goyzueta, Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
      be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
John A. TIBBS and Margaret B. Tibbs, Plaintiffs v. Jennifer D. FORD, Defendant

No. COA17-936

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jermaine Jackson GOINS

No. COA17-458

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
STATE v. Sam Babb CLONTS, III

222A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2018

Daniel M. Blau, Attorney at Law, Robert Hale, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Clonts, Sam Babb (III).

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of February 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 26th day of February 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rodolfo Prieto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Rodolfo Prieto     
|Rodolfo Prieto         
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 13, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-79225 and 333-51034) pertaining to theCorinthian Colleges, Inc. 1998 Performance Award Plan, (Form 333-51032) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form 333-115763) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2003 Performance Award Plan and (Form333-117889) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan of our report dated August 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries included in itsAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

/s/    ERNSTAND YOUNG LLP 

 

Orange County, California 

September 13, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.1


                       TELE NORTE LESTE PARTICIPACOES S.A.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Tele Norte Leste Participacoes S.A. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2005 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: June 29, 2006               By: /s/  Ronaldo Iabrudi dos Santos Pereira
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Ronaldo Iabrudi dos Santos Pereira
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated: June 29, 2006               By: /s/  Jose Luis Magalhaes Salazar
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Name:  Jose Luis Magalhaes Salazar
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
20-F.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
October 11, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00131-CV V.

RONALD JERROLS, Appellee

____________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, TEXAS 

MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and a motion for rehearing filed by appellee, 

RONALD JERROLS. We order that the motions be overruled, and that this court’s 

former judgment of September 6, 2012, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further 

order this court’s opinion of September 6, 2012, be withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, RONALD 

JERROLS, signed February 8, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of 

the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance 

with the court’s opinion.

We order each party to pay their own costs incurred in this appeal. We further 

order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
C. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                By: /s/ RICHARD C. BAILEY
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Richard C. Bailey
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    March 28, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WLG Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Wood, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, David L. Koontz, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge that:





1. The
Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.





Date:
August 14, 2009




By:
              /s/ Christopher Wood
              
              By:
              /s/ David KoontzName:
      Christopher Wood
              
              
              Name:
      David KoontzTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              
              
              Title:
      Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial and
                Accounting
      Officer)