alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4449 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 

to expand the training for Federal Government personnel 

related to trafficking in persons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4449 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Trafficking 

3 Prevention Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANDED TRAINING RELATING TO TRAFFICKING 

5 IN PERSONS. 

6 Section 105(c)(4) of the Trafficking Victims Protec7 tion Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7105(c)(4)) is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, including members of the 

9 Service (as such term is defined in section 103 of 

10 the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3903))’’ 

11 after ‘‘Department of State’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Train13 ing under this paragraph shall include, at a min14 imum, the following: 

15 ‘‘(A) A distance learning course on traf16 ficking-in-persons issues and the Department of 

17 State’s obligations under this Act, targeted for 

18 embassy reporting officers, regional bureaus’ 

19 trafficking-in-persons coordinators, and their 

20 superiors. 

21 ‘‘(B) Specific trafficking-in-persons brief22 ings for all ambassadors and deputy chiefs of 

23 mission before such individuals depart for their 

24 posts. 

25 ‘‘(C) At least annual reminders to all such 

26 personnel, including appropriate personnel from 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4449 RFS 

1 other Federal departments and agencies, at 

2 each diplomatic or consular post of the Depart3 ment of State located outside the United States 

4 of key problems, threats, methods, and warning 

5 signs of trafficking in persons specific to the 

6 country or jurisdiction in which each such post 

7 is located, and appropriate procedures to report 

8 information that any such personnel may ac9 quire about possible cases of trafficking in per10 sons.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jennifer Diane ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. Christian CHAMBERLIN-SPENCER, Defendant.

No. COA17-941

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Samson Jamarco COLEMAN

404P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 25, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Samson Jamarco Coleman, for Coleman, Samson Jamarco.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of September 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of September 2017."
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

y0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142582

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142582 COA: 299537 Chippewa CC: 07-008509-FH THOMAS WESLEY POE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120692),2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150737),3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782),4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211),5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282),7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592), and8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571)
STATE of North Carolina v. Avery Tyrez FORNEY, Defendant.

No. COA17-631

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kim SYDNOR, Defendant.

No. COA17-48

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
STATE v. Montanelle Deangelo POSEY

314A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 2017

Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Posey, Montanelle DeAngelo.

Heather Haney, Assistant Attorney General, Wes Saunders, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of October 2017 by Defendant to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of October 2017."
exh10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO “APPENDIX A” OF THE


ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN












THIS AMENDMENT to “Appendix A” of the Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”), is adopted by Astec Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of February 28, 2013.







WHEREAS, Article 2 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to designate participants in the Plan from time to time, whose names and effective dates of participation shall be set forth on Exhibit A to the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends “Appendix A” of the Plan in the form attached hereto, to update the same for changes in Plan participation approved by the Board, by action taken on February 28, 2013.







Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.







ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.







Date: February 28, 2013                                                                       By /s/ Stephen A. Anderson


Name Stephen A. Anderson


Title VP/Secretary











  





  











  








“APPENDIX A”


Each Participant’s Date of Participation







Name of Participant                                  Effective Dates of Participation


J. Don Brock                                                      January 1, 1995


Thomas R. Campbell                                        January 1, 1995


Frank Cargould                                                 January 1, 1995


Jeff Elliott                                                           January 1, 1995


Tim Gonigam                                                     January 1, 1995


Richard Patek                                                    January 1, 1995


W. Norman Smith                                             January 1, 1995


Joseph Vig                                                         January 1, 1995


Jeff Richmond                                                   May 1, 2004


Richard Dorris                                                   January 3, 2005


Ben Brock                                                          January 1, 2007


Michael A. Bremmer                                        January 1, 2007


Stephen C. Anderson                                      January 1, 2008


Lawrence R. Cumming                                     January 1, 2008


Neil Peterson                                                     January 1, 2008


David C. Silvious                                              January 1, 2008


Joe Cline                                                             February 1, 2008


Chris Colwell                                                      May 31, 2011


Robin Leffew                                                     August 1, 2011


D. Aaron Harmon                                              November 1, 2011


Matthew B. Haven                                            January 1, 2013
STATE v. Christopher B. SMITH

119P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 19, 2018

Mr. Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, For Smith, Christopher B.

Ms. Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of April 2018 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of April 2018."
<PAGE>

OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                            2001              2000              1999
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>               <C>
BASIC:

Net income (loss) available for common stockholders     $(17,607,000)     $(14,793,000)     $    682,000
                                                        ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of
          common shares outstanding                        5,866,000         5,844,000         5,826,000
                                                        ============      ============      ============

Basic income (loss) per common share                    $      (3.00)     $      (2.53)     $       0.12
                                                        ============      ============      ============


DILUTED:

Net income (loss) available for common stockholders     $(17,607,000)     $(14,793,000)     $    682,000
                                                        ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of
          common shares outstanding                        5,866,000         5,844,000         5,826,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                                --                --                --
                                                        ------------      ------------      ------------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding              5,866,000         5,844,000         5,826,000
                                                        ============      ============      ============

Diluted income (loss) per common share                  $      (3.00)     $      (2.53)     $       0.12
                                                        ============      ============      ============


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Jimmy Orlando LITTLEJOHN

No. 87P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 27, 2018

Mr. Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, Attorney at Law, for Littlejohn, Jimmy Orlando

Mr. Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Jimmy Orlando Littlejohn, for Littlejohn, Jimmy Orlando

Mr. Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of April 2018."
EXHIBIT 32.2


               CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     Solely for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  I, the
undersigned  Chief  Financial  Officer of Sew Cal Logo,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report"):

     1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: and

     2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Judy Songer
---------------------------
    Judy Songer
    Chief Financial Officer
    November 30, 2005
### NUMBER 13
- 16 - 00 131 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ GEORGE & PATRICIA LO PEZ, BRUCE & MARY ZIMMERMAN & CAROL A. HENKE , A ppellants ,

v . RONALD BRANDOW INDIV IDUALLY & IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACIT Y & COTTONWOOD CREEK PROPERTY OWNER S, INC. , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant s , George & Patricia Lopez, Bruce & Mary Zimmerman & Carol A. Henke , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 445 th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2014

- DCL

- 8566

- I

. Appellants have filed an amended2

agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the parties have settled all issues
between them in this cause. Appellants request this appeal be dismissed with prejudice against the refiling of same. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to
dismiss with prejudice , is of the opinion that the motion sh ould be granted. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

. Costs will be taxed against appellant s

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court w ill tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties ’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed t he 9th day of June , 201 6

.
#### Sean L. FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2210.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 22, 2003.

Sean L. Fisher, Bushnell, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

SHARP, W., J.

Fisher appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct an illegal sentence. He claims the trial court erred by not giving him credit against his prison sentence for time served while he was on community control. The trial court was correct. Fisher is not entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time previously spent on probation or community control. *See Young v. State,*697 So.2d 75 (Fla.1997); *Toomajan v. State,*785 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

We also reject Fisher’s argument here because it is similar to a prior motion he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he claimed he did not receive credit for time served on probation in this case. Thus, this motion is successive and improper, as well as without merit. We warn Fisher against filing additional successive and improper motions seeking collateral relief in this criminal case. *Carlisle v. State,*849 So.2d 1146*425(Fla. 5th DCA 2003); *Isley v. State,*652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
In the MATTER OF: K.G.M.

No. COA17-304

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 131A/14 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 131A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5914 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 131A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5914 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2016/C 131A/1 | Call for expressions of interest — contract staff — function group I — Drivers (f/m) — EP/CAST/S/16/2016 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2016/C 131A/1

Call for expressions of interest — contract staff — function group I — Drivers (f/m) — EP/CAST/S/16/2016

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
    FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
    IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996             
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1996               
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-01-1996
<CASH>                         538,877
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                         0 
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               772,289
<PP&E>                       9,798,136
<DEPRECIATION>               1,049,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               9,520,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          369,531
<BONDS>                      5,668,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                         5,250
<OTHER-SE>                   3,477,251 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 9,520,610
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             2,082,239
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             1,039,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             394,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                261,289
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            261,289
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                   261,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .42
        


</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth RECTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-1459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 14, 2003.

Appellant, pro se.

*911Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court’s disposition of the motion. *Daniels v. State,*568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Teddy Oliver YARBOROUGH

No. COA17-177

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

NO ERROR AT TRIAL. JUDGMENT REVERSED. REMANDED FOR RE-SENTENCING.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jessie Edward JEFFERIES

No. COA17-775

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 21

                      LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST
               LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Liberty Special Purpose Trust
Liberty Property Philadelphia Corp.
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust - IV East
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust - IV West
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership II
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership III
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership - IV East
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership - IV West
Liberty Property Scottsdale Limited Partnership
Land Holdings Realty LLC
Rivers Business Commons Associates Limited Partnership
Liberty Lehigh Partnership
Liberty Property Malvern Limited Partnership
Liberty Property Malvern LLC
Liberty Property Development Corp.
Liberty Property Development Corp. II
Liberty Property Development Corp. III
Liberty UK Development Corp.
Liberty 2001 Corp.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Chase National Bank of the City of New York, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Robert L. Kane, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

June 9, 1943.

*Arthur W. Graef*for Chase National Bank of the City of New York, as executor and trustee.

*George B. Powers,*special guardian for Donna Whiteside, an infant.

Howell, S.

The testator left all his property in trust to pay the net income, except that. from his dwelling in Awosting, N. J., to his wife for life and thereafter to his daughter for life, remainder to his grandchild. As to his dwelling at Awosting, N. J., he directed the trustee to permit his wife to occupy the same “ at the nominal rental of one dollar per year ” during her lifetime or for such period or periods as she should choose, but, if she would rather receive the net income than occupy it, he conferred upon her the right to direct the trustee to rent it and pay her the net income thereof for her life or until the property should be sold.

The premises had been purchased by the decedent in 1920 and owned by him ever since, he paying the taxes and carrying charges thereon out of Ms own funds up to the time of his death. The executor and trustee prays for a construction of the will to determine whether the carrying charges of the New Jersey dwelling being occupied by the widow" under the terms of the will at the nominal rental of one dollar per year should be paid out of income or principal. The executor and trustee urges that they should be paid out of principal and the special guardian concurs. In support of that contention is cited the case of *Matter of Guggenheimer*(168 Misc. 1), in wMch the facts were strikingly similar to those in a case recently considered by this court *(Matter of the Estate of Jaeck,*dated June *9888, 1943, unreported) in which this court reached the conclusion that carrying charges should be paid out of principal.

Beading the will now under consideration in connection with the circumstances concerning the property known to the testator when he made the will, I reach the conclusion that his intention was to benefit his wife by permitting her to occupy the-New Jersey dwelling at her election free of charge except for the nominal ‘ *‘*one dollar per year ’ ’, and that therefore the carrying charges of that property are properly payable out of principal.

Submit decree on notice.