alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION BiH/7/2005

of 20 September 2005         

on the appointment of the Head of the EU Command Element at Naples for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

(2005/714/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 25, third paragraph, thereof,

Having regard to the Council Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Lieutenant General (select) Giuseppe MARANI is hereby appointed Head of the EU Command Element at Naples for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2005.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

J. KING            

----

(1)OJ L 252, 28.7.2004, p. 10.

----
STATE of North Carolina EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION; Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities Commission; Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Duke Energy Progress, LLC ; Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion North Carolina Power v. NORTH CAROLINA WASTE AWARENESS AND REDUCTION NETWORK

No. 350A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed May 11, 2018

Robert B. Josey, Jr. and David T. Drooz, Staff Attorneys for defendant-appellee Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities Commission.

Allen Law Offices, PLLC, by Dwight W. Allen ; and Lawrence B. Somers, Deputy General Counsel, Duke Energy Corporation; for defendant-appellees Duke Energy Progress, LLC and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.

McGuireWoods, LLP, by E. Brett Breitschwerdt, Andrea R. Kells, and Valyce M. Davis, for defendant-appellee Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Energy North Carolina.

Law Offices of F. Bryan Brice, Jr., by Matthew D. Quinn ; and John D. Runkle for plaintiff-appellant North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network.

Perrin W. de Jong, Asheville, for Center for Biological Diversity, Food and Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Inc., and Institute for Local Self-Reliance; and Howard M. Crystal, pro hac vice, and Anchun Jean Su, pro hac vice, for Center for Biological Diversity, amici curiae.

Burns, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Daniel C. Higgins, Raleigh, for North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, and ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc., amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.3



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. has entered into an agreement with each of the following persons, which is substantially identical to the form of Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009: 
 Abdelnaser Adas 

Stephen N. Ananias 

Allison K. Musetich 

Brandi R. Steege 

Preetinder S. Virk
In the MATTER OF: Z.R., J.R., C.R.

No. COA17-950

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 5, 2018

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19075]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-19075 Filed 9-20-05; 2:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Betty Jo O'NEAL, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey Hunter FOX and Lisa Polley Fox, Defendants.

No. COA17-754

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
In the MATTER OF: I.A. & E.L.

No. COA17-877

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ricardo Lee SWAIN, Defendant.

No. COA16-1221

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

REMANDED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Maurice Alexander ROBINSON

No. COA17-839

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First State
Financial Corporation (the Company), each certify that, to such officers knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | (a) | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ John E. Jed Wilkinson          
|                  |  |     |  | John E. Jed Wilkinson              
|                  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |    
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis Grinsteiner               
|                  |  |     |  | Dennis Grinsteiner                   
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. ) ) Under Contract Nos. NOO 178-04-D-4072 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60745
Craig A. Holman, Esq.

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Kara M. Klaas, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract ManagementAgency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 8 June 2017

DAYID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60745, Appeal ofSystems Application & Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
STATE v. Reginald Underwood FULLARD

309P15-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Reginald Fullard, For Fullard, Reginald Underwood.

Mr. James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for the State.

*240The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of April 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DSA Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Steven R. Doll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Steven R. Doll
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven R. Doll
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

40P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Arthur O. Armstrong, Los Angeles, CA, for Armstrong, Arthur O.

The following order has been entered on the motions filed by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Writ of Mandamus:

"All Motions Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 
 (Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement) 

This Amendment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of January 1, 2013, by and between Market Leader, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Ian Morris (“Executive”). 
 Recital 
 The parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated April 2004 (the “Agreement”) and an Amendment Agreement dated December 30, 2008 (the “Amendment Agreement”), and now wish to amend the
Agreement and the Amendment Agreement on the terms set forth below. 
 Amendment 

 

	1.	The following paragraph shall replace Section 3.1 of the Agreement in its entirety: 


 

	 	3.1	Base Salary 

 Commencing the date hereof, Executive
shall be paid an annual base salary (the “Base Salary”) of $388,000, before all customary payroll deductions. The Base Salary shall be paid in twenty four semi-annual installments in accordance with Employer’s ordinary payroll
policies and procedures with respect to its management employees. 
  

	2.	The following paragraph shall replace 3.3 of the Agreement in its entirety: 

  

	 	3.3	Benefits 

 Executive will be entitled, during the
term of Executive’s employment, to vacation, health and other employee benefits (subject to applicable eligibility requirements) to the extent such benefits are offered by the Company to its other executives. Executive has been provided a
summary of the benefits in place at this time. 
  

	3.	Section 3.5 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety. 

  

	4.	Section 18 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety. 


Except as expressly set forth herein, the Agreement and the Amendment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above. 

 

							
	MARKETLEADER, INC.	 		 		 	
				
	  
	 		 	  
	 	
	By (signature)	 		 	By (signature)	 	
				
	  
	 		 	  
	 	
	Name (print)	 		 	Executive (print)	 	
				
	  
	 		 	  
	 	
	Title	 		 	Title
**EXHIBIT 31****CERTIFICATION**I, Tom Anderson, certify that:1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Novint Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2007     /s/ TOM ANDERSON     Tom Anderson  Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Robert YOUNG

No. COA16-995

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerome JOHNSON

No. 91P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Ms. Michelle F. Lynch, Attorney at Law, for Johnson, Jerome

Mr. Jarrett McGowan, Raleigh, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Jerome Johnson, for Johnson, Jerome

Ms. Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Morgan, J.

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
#### THE SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY, a corporation Plaintiff, v. SPRINT, a corporation Defendant.

No. C-02-1956-SC.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 22, 2003.

Paul N. Halvonik, Berkeley, CA, Megan Halvonik, Sacramento, CA, Martin R. Glick, Robert T. Cruzen, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff the Saul Zaentz Company.

Jessie F. Beeber (Pro Hac Vice), Andrew D. Patrick (Pro Hac Vice), Edward H. Rosenthal (Pro Hac Vice), Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, New York, NY, for Defendant Sprint Spectrum L.P., incorrectly sued herein as Sprint, a corporation.

*PERMANENT INJUNCTION*

CONTI, District Judge.

WHEREAS, this action was filed on or about April 22, 2002 (the “Action”); and

WHEREAS, the parties to this Action are plaintiff The Saul Zaentz Company (“Zaentz”) and Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”), sued herein as Sprint, a corporation (collectively, the “Parties”); and

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a confidential resolution of the Action; and

WHEREAS, as a part of that resolution, Sprint has consented to the entry of a permanent injunction against it as detailed below; and

WHEREAS, good cause for entry of such an order appearing to the Court:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Sprint, *928its agents (including, without limitation, Publicis & Hal Riney and Harvest), employees and all persons in active concert with it, are permanently enjoined from publishing, broadcasting, disseminating or using in any manner the television commercial that is the subject of this Action (the “Commercial”) or any version or draft of the Commercial, or any future version of the Commercial that is- substantially similar under U.S. copyright law to the film “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”;

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with this Action;

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this Action and the Parties to the extent necessary to enforce this permanent injunction.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

IT IS AGREED that this permanent injunction (the “Injunction”) may be entered between the Parties in this Action.

The Parties whose counsel sign this Injunction agree and represent to the Court that:

1. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and each party to this action, not only for purposes of rendering the Injunction, but for enforcing it in any matter permitted by law. This Injunction will be fully enforceable against Sprint, all persons named in this Injunction, and any and all other persons in active concert with those persons.

2. The Parties have been fully counseled on and understand the consequences of this Injunction.

3. The attorneys who sign this Injunction on behalf of the Parties are fully authorized to do so on behalf of their respective principals.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2008
    /s/ David GaoDavid GaoChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Maximum Awards,
Inc. (the "Company") for the for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Maxwell Thomas,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 26, 2005


By: /s/ Maxwell Thomas
    ____________________
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer



This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLC and will be retained by Reitler Brown
& Rosenblatt LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 2.7




FAX COVER SHEET
 TO
:flrangel@timbrasil.com.br; rsrosa@timbrasil.com.br;

edneves@timbrasil.com.br; emfigueiredo@timbrasil.com.br.
 C/C
: Gestão Operac. Banca Mayorista
 FROM
: Ativos GB&M
 COMPANY
: Banco Santander (Brasil) S/A
 E-MAIL
:ativosformcorp@santander.com.br
 FAX
: 5538-5255
 
 Ref. : OPERATION CONFIRMATION
 
 Dear Sirs:
  According to our records, in this date was effected the operation detailed as follows, of which we request the data to be confirmed with signatures and stamps of the legal representatives of the company in the designated space at the end thereof.
 
 Client
: TIM CELULAR S.A.
 CNPJ (Tax ID No.)
: 04.206.050/0001-80
 Product
: Resolution 2770
 Start Date
: 08.31.2009
 Due Date
: 12.31.2009
 Amount
: R$ 184.813.000,00
 Tax
: 120,00% CDI
 Guarantee (if applicable)
: ---
 
 Respectfully,
 Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A.
 _______________________________________________________
 We confirm the operation described above, effected in this date.
 
 In Agreement:                             (Appears signature)
 ___________________________________
 
 (Stamp and signature(s) of the legal representatives)
 TIM CELULAR S.A.
 Marco Chiarucci
 Finances Manager
    
 Av. Interlagos, 3501 – Jardim Umuarama – São Paulo – CEP: 0460-006.