alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50977

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Everardo Villegas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 2:19-CR-2647-3

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Everardo Villegas has moved to 

withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villegas has not filed 

a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50977 Document: 00516316733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2022
No. 21-50977

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-50977 Document: 00516316733 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2022
David WICHNOSKI, O.D., P.A., et al. v. PIEDMONT FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, LLC, et al.

26PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 2018

John W. Reis, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Main Street America Assurance Company.

Jay M. Goldstein, Attorney at Law, Albert S. Nalibotsky, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for David Wichnoski, O.D., P.A., et al.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 8th of January 2018 to Continue Oral Argument:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of January 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Curtis Louis SANGSTER

No. 84P15-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Curtis Louis Sangster, for Sangster, Curtis L.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of January 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
# C_2013171EN.01004003.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/40

---

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-221/07) (1)

1

2013/C 171/82

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.

1

---
BROWN v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, et al.

429P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

Richard B. Harper, Attorney at Law, Sylva, for Brown, Jacquelyn.

Donna B. Wojcik, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Public Instruction (Macon County Schools), et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of December 2017 by Plaintiff to Deem Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

*235"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6592** 

SHERRICK S. HALSEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. JOHN R. PATE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 0:11

- cv - 00702

- TLW )

Submitted : August 20, 2012 Decided: August 28, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Sherrick S. Halsey , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General , Brendan McDonald , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sherrick S. Halsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss ues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies re lief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Halsey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability and d ismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of DSA  Financial  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,  2005,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date of this  Certification  (the
"Report"),  I, Steven R. Doll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA  Financial  Corporation  and will be  retained by DSA  Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



                                               /s/Steven R. Doll
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Steven R. Doll
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 12, 2005
# Amtsblatt C 433A/3. D

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 433A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 57. Jahrgang3. Dezember 2014 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 433A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

57. Jahrgang3. Dezember 2014

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 433A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/267/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2014/C 433A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/267/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 433A/02 | Übersicht der im „C A“-Amtsblatt veröffentlichten Auswahlverfahren | 2 |

2014/C 433A/02

Übersicht der im „C A“-Amtsblatt veröffentlichten Auswahlverfahren

2

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-83768 and 33-78925 of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. and subsidiary on Form
S-8 of our report dated February 9, 2001 (March 28 as to the waiver letters
described in Note 4), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boyd
Bros. Transportation Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Boyd
Bros. Transportation Inc. and subsidiary, listed in Item 14 (a) for the year
ended December 31, 2000. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic 2000 consolidated financial statements as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 28, 2003
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Chad DeGroot, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Metasun Enterprises, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.            The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metasun Enterprises, Inc. for the three month period ended October 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metasun Enterprises, Inc.

Dated:  December 20, 2005

/s/ Chad DeGroot

Chad DeGroot

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Metasun Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Metasun Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE: J.M. & J.M.

363PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 9, 2018

Joyce L. Terres, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Martin, Willie (III).

Cathy L. Moore, Assistant County Attorney, for Durham County DSS.

Erica R. Messimer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Matthew Wunsche, Attorney at Law, Durham, for GAL.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of January 2018 by Petitioner and GAL to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of January 2018."
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 997/2005

of 29 June 2005         

setting the actual production of olive oil and the unit amount of the production aid for the 2003/2004 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2261/84 of 17 July 1984 laying down general rules on the granting of aid for the production of olive oil and of aid to olive oil producer organisations (2), and in particular Article 17a(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   For the 2003/2004 marketing year, the actual production to be used to calculate the aid for olive oil as referred to in Article 5 of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be:

2.   For the 2003/04 marketing year, the unit amount of the production aid referred to in Article 5 of Regulation No 136/66/EEC payable on the eligible quantities of actual production shall be:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97).

(2)OJ L 208, 3.8.1984, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1639/1998 (OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 38).

(3)OJ L 229, 25.8.2001, p. 16. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/607/EC (OJ L 274, 24.8.2004, p. 13).

(4)OJ L 229, 25.8.2001, p. 20. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/607/EC.

(5)OJ L 229, 25.8.2001, p. 12. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/607/EC.

(6)OJ L 231, 29.8.2001, p. 16. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/607/EC.

(7)OJ L 235, 4.9.2001, p. 16. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/607/EC.

(8)OJ L 318, 19.10.2004, p. 13.

(9)OJ L 293, 31.10.1998, p. 50. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1432/2004 (OJ L 264, 11.8.2004, p. 6).

----
STATE v. Ailkeem Anthony NORMAN

153PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Ben G. Irons, II, Attorney at Law, For Norman, Ailkeem Anthony.

Mr. Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of May 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
NEWELL v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

347P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Jonathan James Newell, for Newell, Jonathan James.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Public Safety, et al.

Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for the State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of October 2017 by Petitioner for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
#### In re Lillian JOHNS and Shalonda Johns Applying to Obtain an Order to Exhume the Body of the Deceased, Melvin Johns v. Dr. Naurang AGRAWAL, et al. In re Lillian Johns and Shalonda Johns v. Naurang Agrawal, M.D., et al.

No. 2003-C-1399.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Johns, Lillian; Johns, Shalonda;— Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiora-ri and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. H, Nos. 95-1597, 96-20797; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No(s). 2002-CA-1467, 2002-CA-1468.

Denied.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

K.J. BRUBAKER, D.C. KING, P.D. LOCHNER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BYRON A. W. GROBE

FIRE CONTROL TECHNICIAN SECOND CLASS (E

- 5), U.S. NA VY

NMCCA 201600003

GENERAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 26 August 2015

. Military Judge: CDR Robert P. Monahan Jr., JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Comma nder, Navy Region Mid

- Atlantic,

Norfolk, VA

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: CDR A.R. House, JAGC,

USN

. For Appellant: LT Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller , Esq

.

2 1 April 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

---------------------------------------------------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved

by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military

Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of Pure Biofuels
Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 16,
      2009/s/ Gustavo GoyzuetaGustavo
      Goyzueta, Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). SS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I SI D RO O RTI Z- RO SA LES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 75105 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 025- 026 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . I s i dr o O rt i z - R os a l e s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s r e que s tf orvol unt aryde partur e . O ur



# FI LED MA R 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSS S/ Res ea r ch 07- 75105 2 j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e di sm i ss i n p artand d eny i n p art th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary deni alof vo l un t ary d e p artu r e . See 8 U . S . C . § § 1 2 2 9 c(f), 1 2 5 2 (a)(2 )(B )(I). O rt i z-R o sal es’ du e p ro cess c la im r e g ar d in g th e d e n ia l o f v o lu n taryd e p artu r e is n o t c o lo r ab le . See M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). In hi s openi ng bri ef

, O rt i z- R osal es fa i l s t o add re ss , and there fore has w ai ved an yc h a lle n g e to , th e a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f h is ap p lic a tio n f

o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s not s p e c if ic a llyr a is e da n da r g u e din ap arty ’s o p e n in g b r ie f a r e w a iv e d ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.
In the MATTER OF: Anthony Rayshon BETHEA

No. 359P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2018

James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Bethea, Anthony Rayshon

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *242***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Petitioner on the 24th of October 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of October 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2018."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL PIPER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 124 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>   1


                                    EXHIBIT
                                      21.1




                                       50



<PAGE>   2
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





            NAME                                            LOCATION
            ------------------------------------------      ------------


            PENDA ROO HOLDING CORPORATION                   FLORIDA

            PENDA AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.                       AUSTRALIA

            PENDA INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORPORATION         FLORIDA

            PENDA LATINO AMERICANO HOLDING CORPORATION      MEXICO

            PENDA SA DE C.V.                                MEXICO

            "PEMSA", PROCESOS ESPECIALES
             DE MEXICO, SA DE C.V.                          MEXICO

            PENDA FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION                 BARBADOS

            PENDA-MEXICO EMPLOYMENT                         FLORIDA

            TRI-GLAS CORPORATION                            ALABAMA



                                       51
Patrick MALONE, Plaintiff, v. Leigh HUTCHISON-MALONE, Defendant.

No. COA 17-241

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

AFFIRMED. REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4231 

To prohibit United States assistance to the East-West Center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States assistance to the East-West 

Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE 

4 TO THE EAST-WEST CENTER. 

5 No funds available to the Department of State or any 

6 other department or agency may be used to provide assist7 ance to the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange 

8 Between East and West (commonly known as the East9 West Center). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS