alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Alex Alimanestianu, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town Sports International Holdings,Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.         By:             /s/ Alex Alimanestianu    Alex Alimanestianu    *Chief Executive Officer*   Date: November 1, 2007
26
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 2334

MUSHTAQ MOHAMMAD , Petitioner ,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appe a l s.

Submitted : May 9, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Richard W. Chen, New York, New York , for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General , Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lisa M. Damiano, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mushtaq Mohammad, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board ) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his appl ications for asylum , withholding of

removal , and protection under the Convention Against Torture . We have thoroughly reviewed the record, the transcript of Mohammad’s merits hearing, and Mohammad’s supporting affidavit and evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (20 12 ), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See

INS v. Elias

– Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Mohammad (B.I.A. Oct. 21 , 201 6 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              54,132
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               4,220
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    25,129
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         34,679
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             191,662
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               192,302
<LOANS>                                            311,376
<ALLOWANCE>                                          1,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     647,853
<DEPOSITS>                                         469,088
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  7,831
<LONG-TERM>                                         98,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               529
<OTHER-SE>                                          72,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     647,853
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     23,116
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   13,769
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     2,104
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    38,989
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  14,739
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20,797
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               18,192
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          330
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     330
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     13,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,911
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           5,911
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.29
<LOANS-NON>                                              0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1,972
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     1,484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            8
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    1,806
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 1,806
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              1,806



</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4107

_____________________________

WENDY SUE CARTER, Former 

Wife,

Appellant,

v.

JASPER JAMES CARTER, Former 

Husband,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

W. Gregg McCaulie, Judge.

May 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Caleb D. Rowland of Rowland Law, LLC, Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Jasper James Carter, pro se, Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Association of Home 
Appliance Manufacturers (``AHAM'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Association 
of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Washington, DC. The nature and scope 
of AHAM's standards development activities are: the development and 
publication of product performance standards for home appliances.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1975 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Ex10.188 Jul RRA 5.375-2023


Exhibit 10.188


Counterpart to Registration Rights Agreement
July 10, 2014
The undersigned hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably agrees as a Guarantor, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 30, 2014 by and among Endo Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Endo Finco Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Guarantors party thereto, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and RBC Capital Markets, relating to the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2023, to be bound by the terms and provisions of such Registration Rights Agreement.





Exhibit 10.188


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of the date first written above.
ENDO NETHERLANDS B.V.
 
 
                        By:      /s/ Blaine Davis         
                        Name: Blaine Davis 
                        Title:   Managing Director A 
 
 
 
                        By:      /s/ Gert Jan Rietberg         
                        Name: Gert Jan Rietberg 
                        Title:   Managing Director B
# C_2018463EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2017-2018 SESSION

Sittings of 5 to 8 February 2018

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 254, 19.7.2018
  .

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
STATE v. Quintel Martinez AUGUSTINE

130A03-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2018

Ms. Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Durham, Mr. James E. Ferguson, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel Martinez

Ms. Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of May 2018 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of May 2018."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 2nd day of July 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00945-CR

Style: Zachary Keith Hill v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 25, 2015

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: N/A

Date Requested: N/A (30 days from February 25, 2015)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Although the reporter’s record was filed on January 26, 2015, the clerk’s record 

has not yet been filed, but is due by March 12, 2015, because a timely motion for new 

trial was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.2(b). Thus, appellant’s motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk’s record is 

filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after the date the clerk’s 

record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting individually 

Date: March 3, 2015
# Official Journal C 183/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 183 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 495 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 183

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 495 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 183/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 183/2 | Summary of notifications received in 2005 by the Commission pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 2 |
| 2006/C 183/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4315 — GE/CS/GIMP/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 10 |
| 2006/C 183/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4245 — ABP/Europe Realty/Host/HHR EUro CV — HHR TRS CV) (1) | 11 |
| 2006/C 183/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4304 — GIMA/Synbra Group) (1) | 11 |
| 2006/C 183/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4279 — GDF/Camfin/Energia Investimenti JV) (1) | 12 |
| 2006/C 183/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4244 — Ravago/Muehlstein) (1) | 12 |
| 2006/C 183/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4274 — Investindustrial/Stroili oro) (1) | 13 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 183/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 183/2

Summary of notifications received in 2005 by the Commission pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council

2

2006/C 183/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4315 — GE/CS/GIMP/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

10

2006/C 183/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4245 — ABP/Europe Realty/Host/HHR EUro CV — HHR TRS CV) (1)

11

2006/C 183/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4304 — GIMA/Synbra Group) (1)

11

2006/C 183/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4279 — GDF/Camfin/Energia Investimenti JV) (1)

12

2006/C 183/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4244 — Ravago/Muehlstein) (1)

12

2006/C 183/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4274 — Investindustrial/Stroili oro) (1)

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 259/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 259 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 609 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 259

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 609 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 259/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8560 — HAPM/Magna/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 259/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8560 — HAPM/Magna/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 259/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2017/C 259/03 | Commission Implementing Decision of 7 August 2017 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the single document referred to in Article 94(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the reference to the publication of the specification for the name of the wine sector (La Clape (PDO)) | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 259/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2017/C 259/03

Commission Implementing Decision of 7 August 2017 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the single document referred to in Article 94(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the reference to the publication of the specification for the name of the wine sector (La Clape (PDO))

Official Journal of the European Union

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 259/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8524 — Advent International Corporation/Industrial Parts Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |
| 2017/C 259/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8572 — Pamplona Capital/Parexel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 259/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8524 — Advent International Corporation/Industrial Parts Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

2017/C 259/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8572 — Pamplona Capital/Parexel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-100118 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
March 25, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of McLeodUSA Incorporated (which report includes explanatory paragraphs relating to
substantial doubt of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and the application of AICPA Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting for Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code") and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McLeodUSA
Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 25, 2005

---



QuickLinks
No. 99-50571

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50571

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES ROBERT COX,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A94-CR-67-6-JN

--------------------

February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Robert Cox was convicted in 1996 of using a telephone

to facilitate distribution of methamphetamine. He did not

appeal, and his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was dismissed as time-barred. Cox filed a

"motion for clarification of sentence," seeking to have the

district court clarify whether his time served in state custody

would be credited against his federal sentence. The district

court denied the motion, and Cox appeals.

The district court did not err in denying the motion,

because it was without jurisdiction to grant credit for Cox's
No. 99-50571

-2-

prior state custody. See United States v. Dowling, 962 F.2d 390,

393 (5th Cir. 1992). Cox argues that he was seeking merely to

have the court clarify whether his federal sentence was to run

consecutively to the state sentence. Under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3584, "[m]ultiple terms of imprisonment imposed at different

times run consecutively unless the court orders that the terms

are to run concurrently." Moreover, the Bureau of Prisons

notified Cox that it had confirmed that his federal sentence was

to run consecutively to his state sentence, and the district

court previously denied a motion by Cox raising this same issue. 

Because Cox has received the "clarification" he purportedly

seeks, his motion is moot.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TERRANCE POTEAT, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 406 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 14th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
STATE v. Joseph Burton MIAL

17P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Jospeh Burton Mial, for Mial, Joseph Burton.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of January 2018 by Defendant for Copies of Documents Out of the Court Record:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerome JOHNSON

No. COA17-412

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Robert FINN, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer R. FINN, Defendant.

No. COA17-811

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED.