alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 333/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6419 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 333

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6419 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 333/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10344 — Accenture/Umlaut) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 333/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10344 — Accenture/Umlaut) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 333/02 | Euro exchange rates — 18 August 2021 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 333/02

Euro exchange rates — 18 August 2021

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 333/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10407 — AIP/Alvance Dunkerque Target Business) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2021/C 333/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10393 — Brookfield/Modulaire) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2021/C 333/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10381 — One Rock Capital/The Eastman Tire Additives business of Eastman Chemical Company) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 333/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10407 — AIP/Alvance Dunkerque Target Business) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2021/C 333/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10393 — Brookfield/Modulaire) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2021/C 333/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10381 — One Rock Capital/The Eastman Tire Additives business of Eastman Chemical Company) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2015007EN.01005502.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/55

---

Action brought on 22 October 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-115/14)

(2015/C 007/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, declaration of illegality of Article 9 of the General Provisions for implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 and, second, annulment of the decisions to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant into the European Union pension scheme pursuant to the new GIP.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Make a declaration of illegality in respect of Article 9 of the General Provisions for implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Make a declaration of illegality in respect of Article 9 of the General Provisions for implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decisions of 31 January 2014 and of 13 March 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to her entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those rights to the pension scheme of the EU institutions, pursuant to the General Provisions for implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 31 January 2014 and of 13 March 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to her entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those rights to the pension scheme of the EU institutions, pursuant to the General Provisions for implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Theodore Hunter, Petitioner,

v. Simon Wainwright, Respondent. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil ActionNo.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED NOV - 

## 42010 Clerk, U.S. District&8ankru tc Courts for the District of

### COIU~bra 

# 10 

# 1895

This matter, broughtpro se, is before the Court on its initial review ofpetitioner's application for a writ ofhabeas corpus accompanied by an application to proceed informa pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed informapauperis, deny the petition and dismiss the case. The extraordinary remedy ofhabeas corpus is available to District ofColumbiaprisoners ifthe prisoner shows that he is "incustody in violation ofthe Constitution or laws ortreaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). Petitioner, a District ofColumbiaprisoner at the District ofColumbia Jail, challenges the local statute governing supervised release, D.C. Code 

### § 24-403.01, on the ground that its execution violates the separation ofpowers doctrine. He also asserts that the statute does not apply to him as a "Sovereign Moorish American National." Pet. Attach., AfftofSupporting Factors at 2. Petitioner seeks monetary damages, "recall[]" ofthe statute and his immediate release. On March 23, 2010, petitioner was sentenced to one year ofincarceration and three years ofsupervised release. See Pet. at 2. Itis unclear whether petitioner has legal standing to pursue his challenge at this time but the Court will assume that he does. As the paroling authority forDistrict ofColumbiaprisoners, the United States Parole Commission is authorized by 

### § 24- 403.01(6) to grant, deny or revoke a District ofColumbia offender's parole supervision and to impose or modify his parole conditions. 

### See § D.C. Code § 24-131(a); 

### Thompson v. 

### District of Columbia Dep 't 

### o/Corrections, 511 F. Supp.2d 111, 114 (D.D.C. 2007). Because the foregoing statutes govern the execution ofajudicially imposed sentence, "[t]he Parole Commission does not exercise ajudicial function and its decisions do not violate the separation ofpowers." 

### Montgomery v. 

### Us. Parole Comm'n, Civ. Action No. 06-2133 (CKK), 2007 WL 1232190, at *2 (D.D.C. Apr. 26,2007) (citing cases); accord 

### Leach v. 

### Us. Parole Comm 'n, 522 F. Supp.2d 250, 251 (D.D.C. 2007); 

### Hammett v. 

### Us. Parole Comm 'n, Civ. Action No.10-0442 (JDB), 2010 WL 1257669, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 2, 2010) (observing that "[t]his argument, and similar separation of powers arguments, have been raised often and rejected each time."). Accordingly, the petition for a writ of

### habeas corpus is denied. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: November..5.-, 2010

2
Exhibit 32.3

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |   |
| February 27, 2009                                                   |   |
EXHIBIT
32





CLEAN
POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clean Power Technologies
Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Diane Glatfelter,  as Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July
      9, 2009
                By:
                /s/Diane
      GlatfelterName:
      Diane GlatfelterTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
EXHIBIT 32





CLEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Power Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Diane Glatfelter, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 19,  2010
By:
/s/Diane GlatfelterName:
Diane GlatfelterTitle:
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
NEXT ADVISOR CONTINUED, INC. v. LENDINGTREE, INC. and Lendingtree, LLC

No. 391A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. Russell F. Sizemore, Mr. Jonathan M. Watkins, Ms. Mary Cabell Clay, Mr. Glenn E. Ketner, III, Mr. Scott M. Tyler, Attorneys at Law, For Lendingtree, Inc., et al.

Mr. Christopher G. Smith, Ms. Susan H. Hargrove, Mr. Isaac A. Linnartz, Attorneys at Law, For Next Advisor Continued, Inc.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of October 2016 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 24th of October 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 24th of October 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Business Court, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Business Court:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of November 2016 by Defendants to Amend and Supplement Record on Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of DSA  Financial  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,  2005,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date of this  Certification  (the
"Report"),  I, Edward L. Fischer,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



                                          /s/Edward L. Fischer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Edward L. Fischer
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 12, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 8, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00731

- CV

IN RE Sam LAJZEROWICZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

On November 8, 2017

, r elator filed a peti tion for writ of mandamus. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that r el ator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will is sue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 8, 2017

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed t he seal of the said

court on this 8th day of December, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 20292, styled Sam Lajzerowicz v. Estelita O’Campo Lajzerowicz

, pending in the 131st Judici al District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
STATE of North Carolina v. Glenn Anthony CLORY, Sr.

No. COA17-867

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

NO ERROR.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-79225 and 333-51034) pertaining to theCorinthian Colleges, Inc. 1998 Performance Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-51032) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-115763) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2003 Performance AwardPlan, (Form S-8 No. 333-117889) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan, and (Form S-8 No. 333-124955) pertaining to the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Award Plan of our reports dated September 8, 2005 withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/    ERNST AND YOUNG LLP 

 

Orange County, California 

September 8, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                   |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                      |  | Name:                             |  | Curtis W. Mewbourne    
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | Title:                            |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
#### STATE ex rel. Hilman LAWS, III v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2278.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Laws, Hilman; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial *626Writs, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 99 K 1600 D; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 02-00283.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P.(the “Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Waddell DAVIS, Defendant.

No. COA17-721

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Project Software & Development, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79074, 33-79142,
33-95774, 33-95780, 333-3402) of our report dated November 7, 1997, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statements
schedule of Project Software & Development, Inc. as of September 30, 1997, 1996
and 1995 and for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
December 22, 1997