alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jahsen HEARD, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 1576-16-1.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

September 12, 2017

*109This petition for appeal is granted in part and denied in part. And an appeal is awarded to the appellant from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Hampton, dated September 21, 2016, with respect to the following assignment of error:

The trial court erred in denying Heard's motion to strike (and motion to set aside) the charges of robbery, attempted carjacking, and conspiracy to commit carjacking, where: 1) with regard to all three offenses, the victim, Roy Keddy, never identified Heard as one of the participants in the robbery and thus there remained a reasonable doubt whether Heard actually committed or otherwise aided or abetted those offenses; 2) with regard to the conspiracy, there was no proof that Heard entered into an agreement to commit robbery beforehand and the robbery might have been committed spontaneously; and 3) with regard to the robbery of the phone, there was no proof that the taking of the phone had been accomplished through the use of force, threat, or intimidation, where no demands were made for the phone and the victim was unable to say whether the phone had been taken in the course of the robbery.

*110No bond is required. The clerk is directed to certify this action to the trial court and to all counsel of record.

Pursuant to Rule 5A:25, an appendix is required in this appeal and shall be filed by the appellant at the time of the filing of the opening brief.

After a petition for appeal has been denied as a result of the one-judge review authorized by Code § 17.1-407(C), an appellant, pursuant to Rule 5A:15(a) or Rule 5A:15A(a) "may demand consideration of the petition by three-judge panel pursuant to Code § 17.1-407(D)." Rule 5A:15(a) and Rule 5A:15A(a) require that such a demand "include a statement identifying how the one-judge order is in error...." In this case, appellant's demand for consideration by a three-judge panel did not aver that the one-judge denial order is in error regarding the second or third assignments of error in his petition, and therefore, those assignments of error were not reviewed by the three-judge panel. Accordingly, the remainder of the petition for appeal in this case remains denied for the reasons set forth in the order of this Court dated May 5, 2017.

This Court's records reflect that Charles E. Haden, Esquire, is counsel of record for appellant in this matter.

This order shall be published.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
      I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Wako Logistics Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
      2005
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




**WAKO
                LOGISTICS GROUP, INC.**Date: August
                15, 2005
              By:
              /s/ David
                L. KoontzDavid L. Koontz
                Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial
                  Officer




This
      certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. 
      This
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
      Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Power Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Abdul Mitha, President and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  July 21, 2006

By:  /s/ Abdul Mitha

Name:  Abdul Mitha

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6023

STEVEN REYES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., The Attorney General of the State of Maryland; WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA97-278-JFM) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Reyes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, AnnNorman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Reyes v. Curran , No. CA-97-278-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4416

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant Manuel 
                   V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MANUEL V. MENDOZA POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES, INC. v. TOWN OF COLUMBUS

334PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2017

*146Ryan D. Bolick, Attorney at Law, Virginia M. Wooten, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Town of Columbus, North Carolina.

Benjamin R. Sullivan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Charles C. Meeker, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of December 2017 by Plaintiff for Substitution of Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of December 2017."
[J-103-2014] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee 

 v. 

LARRY FRANCIS WEAVER, 

 Appellant 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 13 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court at Nos. 1870 and 1973 MDA 2012, 

dated August 28, 2013, affirming the 

Judgment of Sentence of the Franklin 

County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal 

Division at No. CP-28-CR-0000516-2010, 

dated June 13, 2012 

ARGUED: November 19, 2014

ORDER 

PER CURIAM DECIDED: December 1, 2014 

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2014, the order of the Superior Court is 

hereby AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Seth H. Meyer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: May 4, 2020 | By:    | /S/ SETH H. MEYER

                                |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | Seth H. Meyer                                           |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer, and 

Chief Accounting Officer |
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, W. Todd Steele, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WPT Enterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statements of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for WPT Enterprises, Inc., and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to WPT Enterprises, Inc., including its subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, WPTEnterprises, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting;5. WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to WPT Enterprises, Inc.’sauditors and the audit committee of WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectWPT Enterprises, Inc.’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in WPT Enterprises, Inc.’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 22, 2005 /s/ W. Todd Steele   W. Todd Steele   Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Montea D. MITCHELL, Appellant.

No. WD 60870.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 20, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 1, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

Laura Grether Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

*81Andrea Mazza Follett, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, C.J., BRECKENRIDGE and HOLLIGER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Montea Mitchell appeals his convictions for two counts of first degree robbery, section 569.020.1(2), RSMo 2000; one count of attempted first degree robbery, sections 564.011.1 and 569.020.1(2), RSMo 2000; and three counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015.1, RSMo 2000. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19080]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science 
and Engineering--(1115).
    Date and Time: October 20, 2005, 8:30 a.m.-7 p.m. October 21, 
2005, 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Place: Computer History Museum, 1401 N. Shoreline Blvd., 
Mountain View, CA 94043.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Gwen Barber-Blount, Office of the Assistant 
Director, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 
1105, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8900.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs and activities on the CISE community. To provide advice to 
the Assistant Director/CISE on issues related to long-range 
planning, and to form ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed 
studies and tasks.
    Agenda: Report from the Assistant Director. Discussion of 
education, diversity, workforce issues in IT; cyberinfrastructure; 
long-range founding outlook and proposal success rates.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19080 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
PACHAS v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

144A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 22, 2018

Ms. Madison Anne Hardee, Attorney at Law, for Pachas, Julissa (Administrator)

Mr. Lee Joseph Miller, Attorney at Law, for NC Department of Health And Human Services

Mr. Douglas S. Sea, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Pachas, Julissa (Administrator)

Ms. Cassidy Estes-Rogers, Attorney at Law, for Pachas, Julissa (Administrator)

Mr. John R. Rittelmeyer, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Disability Rights North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2018 by Disability Rights of North Carolina for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2015

No. 04-15-00204-CR

Robert RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-0979-CR-A

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. Time is extended to 

December 3, 2015. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Section 906 CEO Certification**

**** 

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Monahan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
    -  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
    -  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

       

   

 

David Monahan

Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: May 14, 2010     

 

 

----
WHITLOCK v. WHITLOCK.

S18A0128

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: April 16, 2018

**Per Curiam**.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-97586, 33-97588 and 333-71453) of
our report dated February 06, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Western Ohio Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2002, which report is incorporated by reference in the
Company's annual report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 2003
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000317

22-MAR-2016

07:48 AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introduction, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Modoc County Speaker, (5) Sub-Committee Reports, (6) Chairman's Perspective, (7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, (9) Next Agenda.                              ( print page 57854)    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 13, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, PO Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; e-mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by October 11, 2005 will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: September 28, 2005.

James F. Giachino,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-19792  Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002.



I, Stefano De Angelis, Chief Executive
Officer of TIM Participações S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.       the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2.       the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of TIM Participações S.A.



Dated:	April 10, 2017



| | By: | /s/ Stefano De Angelis        
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name:	Stefano De Angelis      
| |     | Title:	Chief Executive Officer