alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 20 
October 2005 at 9 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance 
of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the 
above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language 
interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at 
least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 26 September 2005.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19560 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Julia NICHOLS v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

No. 317P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Alan McSurely, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Nichols, Julia.

Laura H. McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill.

*869***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Petitioner on the 20th of September 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Respondent, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of September 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
#### Saul RODRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2684.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Saul Rodriquez, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRM. See *Carter v. State,*832 So.2d 247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) and *Henriquez v. State,*829 So.2d 355 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

PETERSON, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7755

JAMES EARL JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA K. KELLY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00066-CMH-BRP)

Submitted: September 17, 2008 Decided: October 15, 2008

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Earl Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
SWAN BEACH COROLLA, L.L.C., et al. v. COUNTY OF CURRITUCK, et al.

397A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2018 Amended January 11, 2018

G. Nicholas Herman, Attorney at Law, Donald I. McRee, Jr., Currituck County Attorney, for County of Currituck, et al.

J. Mitchell Armbruster, Attorney at Law, Lacy H. Reaves, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Swan Beach Corolla, L.L.C., et al.

Lars P. Simonsen, Attorney at Law, Edenton, Roger W. Knight, Attorney at Law, Micah R. Simonsen, Attorney at Law, for Fruitville Beach Civic Association, Inc., et al.

James S. Schenck, IV, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, for N.C. Association of County Commissioners

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of January 2018 by North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of January 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Marshall Lee BROWN, Jr. v. Eric HOOK, Secretary of The Department of Public Safety and Ken Beaver, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution, et al.

No. 83P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 19, 2018

Marshall Lee Brown, Jr., for Brown, Marshall Lee Jr.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Hook, Eric, et al.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 13th of March 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of March 2018."
STATE v. Kurt Allen COREY

189P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 22, 2018

Mr. Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Asheboro, Attorney at Law, for Corey, Kurt Allen

Ms. Sharon Patrick-Wilson, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. Kurt Allen Corey, for Corey, Kurt Allen

Ms. Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. David Learner, District Attorney, for State *460The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2018."
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul R.
Killpack, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: June 28, 2007                     /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Executive, Financial abd
                                        Accounting Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Derrick Uraye STRICKLIN, Appellant.

No. 03-2473.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 2, 2003.

Filed: Sept. 9, 2003.

*850Beau G. Finley, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant.

Maria R. Moran, argued, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Omaha, NE, for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Uraye Stricklin appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, entered after the district court* denied Stricklin’s request to withdraw his guilty plea. A careful review of the record convinces us Stricklin knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to withdraw his plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d). *See United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 893-94 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc); *United States v. Mooring,*287 F.3d 725, 727-28 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 864, 123 S.Ct. 259, 154 L.Ed.2d 106 (2002). The district court repeatedly explained the operation of Rule 11(d) to Stricklin, he acknowledged his understanding of the rule, and he expressly assented to its waiver. *See Blackledge v. Allison,*431 U.S. 63, 74, 97 S.Ct. 1621, 52 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977); *United States v. Gray,*152 F.3d 816, 820 (8th Cir.1998), *cert. denied,*525 U.S. 1169, 119 S.Ct. 1091, 143 L.Ed.2d 91 (1999).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

*

 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MRO Software, Inc., (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned President & Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice
President of Finance & Administration, CFO & Treasurer of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.              /s/   Peter J. Rice
-------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.                   Peter J. Rice
President & Chief Executive Officer      Executive Vice President, Finance &
Date: December 14, 2005                  Administration, CFO & Treasurer
                                         Date: December 14, 2005
Roy A. COOPER, III, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Philip E. BERGER, in His Official Capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; Timothy K. Moore, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; and the State of North Carolina

No. 52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 2, 2017

Mr. D. Martin Warf, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Berger, Philip E.

Mr. Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Berger, Philip E.

Ms. Candace S. Friel, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Berger, Philip E.

Mr. Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III)

Mr. Eric W. David, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III)

Mr. Daniel F.E. Smith, Greensboro, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III)

Mr. Grayson Kelley, Raleigh, Chief Deputy

Mr. Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. John R. Wester, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Mr. J. Dickson Phillips, III, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Mr. Adam K. Doerr, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Mr. Andrew H. Erteschik, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, et al.

Ms. Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members

Ms. Anita S. Earls, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members

Ms. Emily E. Seawell, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members

Mr. Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Mr. Kevin Crandall, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Wake County Superior Court, District Attorney, for State *821ORDER

Having received the three-judge panel's 31 October 2017 order in this case, the Court sets the following supplemental briefing schedule:

> 1. Plaintiff-appellant may file a supplemental brief on or before 16 November 2017.

> 2. Defendant-appellees may file a supplemental brief on or before 30 November 2017.

> 3. Plaintiff-appellant may file a supplemental reply brief on or before 6 December 2017.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the *2nd* day of November, 2017.
# Official Journal C 305I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 305I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6430 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 305I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6430 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | JOINT DECLARATIONS |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 305 I/01 | Joint Statement of the European Parliament and of the Commission | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

JOINT DECLARATIONS

Council

2021/C 305 I/01

Joint Statement of the European Parliament and of the Commission

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

JOINT DECLARATIONS

Council

| 30.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 305/1

---

Joint Statement of the European Parliament and of the Commission

(2021/C 305 I/01)

In the event that the expected cumulative resources from assigned revenues would differ substantially from the amount referred to in Article 4(1)(b), the Parliament, based on a proposal of the Commission, will identify and support the allocation to the Facility, in accordance with Article 314 TFEU, of complementary resources needed to address the financing needs of the Facility and ensure its full implementation. The proposal of the Commission will be consistent with the multiannual financial framework and will not jeopardise the implementation of the programmes listed in Annex I of the Regulation (EU) 2021/1229 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 July 2021 on the public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bradley
M. Colby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





May 14,
2010







/s/
Bradley M. Colby





Bradley
M. Colby,


President
and Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
                        May 17, 2010



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
#### Richard CURNOW, Respondent, v. Duane SMITH, Appellant.

No. WD 61721.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 5, 2003.

Alvin D. Shapiro, Overland Park, KS, for appellant.

Timothy J. Flook, Liberty, for respondent.

Before: HOWARD, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Duane Smith (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Richard Curnow (“Plaintiff’) on a contract. He brings two points on appeal.

First, Defendant contends the trial court erred in not granting his motion to dismiss and in thereafter entering judgment in Plaintiffs favor, because the five-year statute of limitation set forth in section 516.120(1) barred Plaintiffs breach of contract action. Defendant argues in the alternative that if the ten-year statute of limitation in section 516.110(1) applies to Plaintiffs cause of action, the doctrine of laches applies to bar the action because Plaintiffs inaction prevented any attempt by Defendant to gain redress.

In his second point on appeal, Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support one of the trial court’s findings supporting the judgment in favor of Plaintiff.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782), the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-22211), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282), the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592) of Liberty Property Trust and
Liberty Property Limited Partnership and the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-14139), the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
44149), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-53297), the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63115), the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37218), the Registration Statement (Form S-
3 No. 333-45032), the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62504),
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62506), the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63494), the Registration Statement (Form S-
3 No. 333-63978) of Liberty Property Trust and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated February 5, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liberty Property
Trust included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania				/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4443 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4443

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, as the ``Corporal Juan 
                Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUAN MARIEL ALCANTARA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4443

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, as the ``Corporal Juan 
                Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building''.
```