alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1310

DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus

BLADEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY; H. GOLDSTON WOMBLE, JR.; DONALD SHERRILL; ALAN I. MAYNARD; ALLEN W. ROGERS; AJIT NAIK, MD; MYRA HOLLOWAY; DONNA PARNELL; BILL SCARLETT; TOMMY GRIFFIN; EARL BUTLER; VANN PARKER; ELIZABETH KIEVER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-181-H-3) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. H. Goldston Womble, Jr., Elizabethtown, North Carolina; James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Alan I. Maynard, Elizabethtown, North Carolina; Allen W. Rogers, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Mark E. Anderson, PATTERSON, DILTHEY, CLAY, BRYSON & ANDERSON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ryan Michael Shuirman,- 2 - YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Caro lina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: David R. Corbin appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Corbin v. Bladen County , CA-03-181-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2003 & Jan. 6, 2004). We deny Ajit Naik’s motion for certificate of service default and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax ServiceInc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Michael D. Lister, as Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Michael D. Lister                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael D. Lister                               |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| September 13, 2004                              |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
STATE of North Carolina, v. Quentin Odell MATHIS, Defendant.

No. COA17-126

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
#### STATE ex rel. Romallic NASH, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2346.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Nash, Romallic, Sr.;- — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 329,841.

Denied. *State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C.,*94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175.
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-98474 and 333-55835 of Owosso Corporation on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement 33-99526 of Owosso Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 8, 2002, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to Owosso Corporation's ability to continue as a
going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Owosso
Corporation for the year ended October 28, 2001.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 8, 2002
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1984]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--International Electrotechnical Commission 
Technical Committee 55

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International 
Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 55 (``IEC TC 55''), by 
its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association 
(``NEMA''), has filed written notification simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: International 
Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 55, Rosslyn, VA. The 
nature and scope of IEC TC 55's standards development activities are: 
related to wires for electrical winding. IEC TC 55 currently maintains 
a series of IEC 60317 and IEC 60851 standards dealing with 
specifications and test methods for different types of winding wires. 
The standards developed by IEC TC 55 are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1984 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THOMAS STOVALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-4238

[July 27, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ilona Maxine Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-

002982CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Melanie L. Casper, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Pure Biofuels Corp.
(the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2009/s/
      Gustavo
      GoyzuetaGustavo
      Goyzueta, Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Pure Biofuels Corp. and will
be retained by Pure Biofuels Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 15-BS-63

IN RE: LEONARD J. SUCHANEK,

Petitioner.

Bar Registration No. 134635 BDN: 549-08

BEFORE: Glickman and Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judges; and Ruiz, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED - January 29, 2015)

Upon consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant

to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13 (c), based on petitioner’s consent motion to suspend license on account

of disability, it is hereby

ORDERED that petitioner is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the

District of Columbia, effective immediately, until further order of the Court pursuant to D.C. Bar

R. XI, § 13 (c). Petitioner’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance

with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13 (g); and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C.

Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys.

PER CURIAM
Order entered February 13, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00846-CR

DOUGLAS ALLEN MACHUTTA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-23625-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 6, 2017 motion to hold the appeal in abeyance or 

grant time to resolve record issues and restart the briefing timetable. Appellant seeks abatement 

of this appeal pending resolution of the State’s appeal in companion cause no. 05-16-01160-CR

or, alternatively, a pause in the briefing deadlines so that the parties may reconstruct and file by 

agreement five defense exhibits admitted into evidence during the hearing on appellant’s motion 

for new trial that have been lost. On February 10, 2017, Official Court Reporter Vearneas 

Faggett filed a supplemental reporter’s record with two of the five exhibits.

We DENY relief on that part of appellant’s motion requesting an abatement until after 

cause no. 05-16-01160-CR is decided. 
We GRANT the alternate relief sought in appellant’s motion. We ORDER counsel for 

the parties to confer with each other and with Official Court Reporter Vearneas Faggett by 

February 27, 2017, regarding whether the remaining lost defense exhibits from the new trial 

hearing may be reconstructed and replaced by agreement of the parties. In the event some or all 

of the exhibits may be filed by agreement, we further ORDER Official Court Reporter Vearneas 

Faggett to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing the agreed exhibits by March 6, 2017. 

In the event one or more of the three remaining lost exhibits cannot be replaced by 

agreement of the parties, we ORDER counsel for appellant to file a letter with the Court by 

March 6, 2017, identifying which exhibits cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties and 

indicating whether such exhibits are necessary to resolve the appeal. 

We EXTEND the time to file appellant’s brief until April 3, 2017. 

We DIRECT the clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7, to Official Court Reporter Vearneas Faggett, and 

to counsel for the parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cool Roof Rating Council

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 28, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cool Roof Rating Council 
(``CRRC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Cool Roof 
Rating Council, Oakland, CA. The nature and scope of CRRC's standards 
development activities are: to develop and maintain a roofing produce 
solar reflectance and thermal emittance (radiative properties) Ratings 
Program (the standard), which provides for fair, accurate and credible 
procedures for evaluating and labeling the solar reflectance and 
thermal emittance (radiative properties) of roofing products, under a 
strict program administered by the CRRC and to disseminate the 
information to all interested parties. Program information is available 
to http://www/coolroofs.org.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1985 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Daris Lamont SPINKS

No. 432P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. Andrew J. DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Spinks, Daris Lamont

Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Mr. Michael E. Bulleri, Raleigh, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Mr. J. Douglas Henderson, Greensboro, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. Beverly Lee PHILLIPS, Victoria Phillips, and John DOE 236

No. 375P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Walter E. Brock, Jr., Attorney at Law, Andrew P. Flynt, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc.

J. Patrick Williams, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Phillips, Beverly Lee, et al.

Gregg Meyers, Attorney at Law, Leto Copeley, Attorney at Law, Durham, for John Doe 236.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of November 2017 by Defendant (John Doe 236 ) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
#### Melanie J. WHEELER, etc., Appellant, v. Micheal KURTZ, Appellee.

No. 5D02-3013.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 22, 2003.

*232Roland A. Sutcliffe, Jr., and Katherine E. McKinley of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser *&*Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Henry W. Jewett, II, and Christopher J. Konicek of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McClain, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Acree v. Hartford South Inc.,*724 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, JJ., and BARLOW, Associate Judge, concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137883

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137883 COA: 279183 Kalamazoo CC: 06-000902-FC ANDRE McKINLEY BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 20, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2009141EN.01001202.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Graz (Austria)) — Veli Elshani v Hauptzollamt Linz

(Case C-459/07) (1)

1

(Community Customs Code - Article 202 and point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 233 - Incurrence of a customs debt - Unlawful introduction of goods - Seizure and confiscation - Extinction of the customs debt - Moment at which seizure must take place)

2009/C 141/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Graz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Veli Elshani

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Linz

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Graz — Interpretation of Article 202 and point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 233 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code — Extinction of the customs debt linked to the seizure of goods upon their unlawful introduction — Seizure of goods in the Member State of destination — Removal of the goods — Moment at which the debt is extinguished

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 202 and point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 233 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to lead to the extinction of the customs debt, the seizure of goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the Community must take place before those goods go beyond the first customs office situated inside that territory. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 202 and point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 233 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to lead to the extinction of the customs debt, the seizure of goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the Community must take place before those goods go beyond the first customs office situated inside that territory.

| 2. | There is no need to reply to the second question. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to reply to the second question.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007.

1

---
STATE v. Robert Walter HUFFMAN

328P06-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 17, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Robert Walter Huffman, for Huffman, Robert Walter.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of August 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of October 2017."
exh101.htm


 











EXHIBIT 10.1


 

















February 6, 2013

















Mr. Adalberto Cantu, Jr.


345 Parsons Green


Shreveport. Louisiana 71106







Dear Mr. Cantu,







On behalf of Home Federal Bank, I am pleased to convey to you in writing our employment offer for the position of Senior Credit Officer in the Credit and Loan Administration Division. This is an exempt position. We are excited about your decision to join HFB and look forward to working with you. Please allow me to reiterate the elements of the job offer that we discussed previously. They are as follows:








	 	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President


Senior Credit Officer

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Reports To:

	
Jim Barlow, President of HFB on a daily basis

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Salary:

	
$100,000 annualized

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Incentive:

	
Currently, all employees not included in a production based incentive plan are eligible to receive an annual performance-based, incentive payment.

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Vacation:

	
3 weeks (15 days) in 2013, 3 weeks (15 days) per year beginning January 1, 2014. Employees are eligible for paid vacation leave after 90 days of employment.

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Sick Leave:

	
20 days per year, cumulative to a maximum of 30 days. Employees are eligible for paid sick leave after 90 days of employment.

	 
	 	  	  	 
	 	
Benefits:

	
Eligible to contribute to the Home Federal Bank 401(k) plan on the 1st day of the month following 90 days of employment. Eligible for Employer Safe Harbor Match following one (1) year of employment.

	 























  





  











  






 



	  

  Page Two


  February 6, 2013


 

	 





 










	
Benefits (cont.)

	
Group health, dental, and vision coverage available on 1st day of the month following 30 days of employment.


 


STD, ETD, AD&D, and Life Insurance coverage provided on 1st day of the month following 30 days of employment.

	 
	  	  	 
	
Start Date:

	
2-19-13

	 










This offer does not include any other statements that may have been made by representatives of Home Federal Bank or Home Federal Bancorp of Louisiana. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (318) 841-1171.







James R. “Jim” Barlow

















/s/James R. Barlow


President and CEO


Home Federal Bank

















Accepted this 6th day of February 2013







/s/Adalberto Cantu, Jr.                                                      


Adalberto Cantu, Jr.
HAIRSTON v. HARWARD

416A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2018

Mr. C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Hairston, William (Jr.)

Mr. James M. Roane, III, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Hairston, William (Jr.)

Mr. Kent L. Hamrick, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, For Harward, Ashwell Bennett (Jr.)

Ms. Ann C. Rowe, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, For Harward, Ashwell Bennett (Jr.)

Ms. Stephanie W. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Erie Insurance Exchange

Ms. Ann C. Ochsner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Mr. Huntington M. Willis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Ms. Deborah J. Bowers, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys

Mr. Andrew G. Pinto, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys

Mr. John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Hairston, William (Jr.)

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of April 2018 by North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of April 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).