alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this Report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures presented in this
Report are conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control, to
the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation or internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely effect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control; and
 Date: May 20, 2011
    /s/ William ODowd IVWilliam ODowd IVChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Dean Paul WHITE

No. COA17-142

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                                        

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-82550, 33-94886, 333-00442, 333-03686, 333-10879, 
333-15697, and 333-30823) and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-13377, 333-11091, 
333-21751 and 333-32781) of Ascend Communications, Inc. of our report dated
January 22, 1997, except for Note M as to which the date is March 30, 1997, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and our report dated January
22, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statement schedule of
Cascade Communications Corp. as of December 31, 1996, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, which reports are included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Ascend Communications, Inc.


                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston Massachusetts
May 27, 1998
# Presidential Determination with Respect to Foreign Governments' Efforts Regarding Trafficking in Persons

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State  

Consistent with section 110 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (Division A of Public Law 106-386), as amended, (the “Act”), I hereby: 

would promote the purpose of the Act or is otherwise in the national interest of the United States. 

The certification required by section 110(e) of the Act is provided herewith. 

                        You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

[FR Doc. 05-19786

Billing code 4710-10-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended November 25, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, L. Kenneth Cordell, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date: December 21,2007

 
| By:        | **/s/ L. Kenneth Cordell**                |
|------------|-------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **L. Kenneth Cordell**                    |
| ** ** | **President and Chief Executive Officer** |
| ** ** | **Principal Executive Officer**           |

 

----
#### STATE ex rel. Franklin BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2265.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Brown, Franklin; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 1-27386-94; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-554.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring relator’s motion to recall his detainer to the Second Justice of the Peace Court in Jefferson Parish for its consideration. The Justice of the Peace Court is directed to provide this Court with a copy of its ruling.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS NO. AP -76,149
EXP AR TE JA M ES C UR TIS F IELD S , A pplic ant
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 619235 IN THE 179th DISTRICT COURT

F RO M HA RRIS CO UN TY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedure , the cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to this Court t his application for writ of habe as cor pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was co n v i ct ed of ag g ravated assault and sente nced to twenty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Th e Ap pli c ant s e e ks an o ut- of -t ime a pp e a l. S pe c if

ic a lly , he c on te nd s th a t the wa ive r o f h is rig ht to appeal in this cause was premature beca use the trial court did not follow the plea ag ree ment for a twenty -five y ear sentenc e when it se ntence d him to forty y ear s’ imprisonment a s set out on the jud g me nt.2

The trial c ourt has dete rmined that the pl ea ag ree ment was followe d, but that a cler ical er ror
wa s mad e on the jud g me nt. Th e tr ia l c ourt ha s c or re c te d th is e rr or

by e nte ri nga

jud g me nt nu nc pr o tunc ref lectingthe Applicant’ s sentence as twenty five y ear s’ imprisonment. There fore , we or der the officia ls at t he Tex as Department of Criminal Jus tice, Corre ctional Institut ions Division, t o corr ect the A pplicant’s rec ords, if they have not a lrea dy

done so, to show that he rece ived a twenty five y ear sentenc e in the judgme nt of conviction in Case No. 619235 from the 179th J udicial District Court of Har ris County
. Copies of this opinion

s h a llb e s e nt to the Texas Depar tment of Criminal J ustice, Corre ctional Institut ions Division and Parole Division.

Deliver ed: May

6, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4360 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Forest Service 

for the Grandfather Ranger District located at 109 

Lawing Drive in Nebo, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Jason 

Crisp Forest Service Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4360 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JASON CRISP FOREST SERV2 ICE BUILDING, NEBO, NORTH CAROLINA. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the Grandfather 

4 Ranger District of the United States Forest Service lo5 cated at 109 Lawing Drive in Nebo, North Carolina, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Jason Crisp Forest Serv7 ice Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jason Crisp Forest 

12 Service Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1553

MOHAMED LAMINE DIAWARA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General;

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-504-480)

Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theresa I. Obot, LAW OFFICE OF THERESA I. OBOT, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Larry P.

Cote, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

Vacated by Supreme Court, January 9, 2006
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mohamed Lamine Diawara, a native and citizen of Guinea,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the decision of the

immigration judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of

deportation, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We

dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Diawara challenges the IJ’s findings that his asylum

application was untimely and he failed to establish extraordinary

circumstances for an exception under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2) (2000).

We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this claim or the

merits of his asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3)

(2000); Zaidi v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th Cir. 2004).

We also lack jurisdiction over Diawara’s challenges to the IJ’s

denial of withholding of deportation and relief under the

Convention Against Torture because he failed to properly exhaust

these claims in his appeal to the Board. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)

(2000); Asika v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Dupri Kason BOOKER

No. COA16-1142

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tom J. Fatjo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Tom J. Fatjo, Jr.Tom J. Fatjo, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerOctober 29, 2010




The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 17, 1999; THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 24 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 17, 1999;
AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 24 WEEKS ENDED
APRIL 17, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-17-1999
<CASH>                                            4645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    80627
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1158
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                124186
<PP&E>                                           47344
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  192215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            65949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                       71707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    192215
<SALES>                                         278335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                279732
<CGS>                                           220829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   270162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (178)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   767
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8679
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5208
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1315)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3893
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Renaldo Jackson, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 87]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J., at hearing; Brenda Soloff, J., at plea and sentence), rendered April 28, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

*358Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant’s claim that the People failed to establish that the search of the car was in accordance with standard inventory procedures is unpreserved *(People v Dickens,*218 AD2d 584, *affd*88 NY2d 1031), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence established the reasonableness of the police action *(People v Gonzalez,*62 NY2d 386). Defendant, who was properly stopped for a traffic violation, was seen making a lunging movement towards the floor of the front passenger area of the car just as he was pulled over. The police were entitled to impound and inventory the car because defendant had neither a driver’s license nor registration papers for the car and therefore could not drive it. The officer testified that, in accordance with standard police procedure, defendant was to be transported to the precinct, while the vehicle was to be “secured” and its contents determined. Under the circumstances, the police were justified in conducting a limited search of the area where he was seen lunging prior to making a more complete inventory search at the precinct *(People v Dickens, supra).*There is no basis in the record to conclude that the search was made in bad faith or that the officers conducted an indiscriminate search of the car without regard to the underlying objectives of an inventory search *(compare, People v Galak,*80 NY2d 715). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
ex4-9.htm


Exhibit 4.9


 


 


Canberra Financial Services II, Inc.


7865 Vallagio La.


Unit 411


Denver, Colorado, 80112


(954) 401-2888







February 8, 2008







NuState Energy, Inc. formerly Fittipaldi Logistics Inc.


ATTN: Frank Reilly, Chief Executive Officer


902 Clint Moore Road, Suite 204


Boca Raton, FL 33487












Dear Mr. Reilly:












This is to inform you that State Petroleum Distributors, Inc. has assigned its Promissory Note (the “Note”) executed on September 27, 2007 by Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc. (“Fittipaldi”) in the amount of $100,000 and its two payments made in October 2007 to Fittipaldi totaling $40,000, to Canberra Financial Services II, Inc. (“Canberra”), pursuant to an Assignment Agreement dated February 8, 2008, attached.







We hereby acknowledge that the Note is not due until September 27, 2008 and that we have agreed that $25,000 of the $40,000, as assigned to Canberra, will be added to the Note with interest accruing at the same rate as the Note (8%), interest being accrued on the $25,000 commencing January 1, 2008 and the $25,000 principal and accrued interest being due also on September 27, 2008. The $15,000 we acknowledge was used for equipment purchases and if such equipment is returned to NuState Energy, Inc. (“NuState”) then Canberra will receive a credit or additional payment to Canberra. If the equipment is not returned to NuState the $15,000 will not be repaid by NuState or be an obligation of NuState.







Please sign below as confirmation that you have been notified of this assignment and acknowledge the terms above, and fax this acknowledgment back to me in care of Milton Barbarosh at (561) 361-1867. For purposes of this acknowledgment a facsimile copy or email PDF will be treated as an original.







Very truly yours,


CANBERRA FINANCIAL SERVICES II, INC.












/s/ Harry Gelbard


Harry Gelbard,


President












I hereby confirm receipt and acknowledge the terms above and this assignment notification.







/s/ Frank Reilly


Frank Reilly, CEO


NuState Energy, Inc.
No. 17,428.

#### Horlbeck et al. *v.*Walther.

(279 P. [2d] 434)

Decided January 17, 1955.

Rehearing denied January 31, 1955.

Mr. Howard E. Erickson, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Elias J. Candell, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam:

Nowhere in the record submitted by plaintiffs in error does it appear that a judgment was entered against them in the trial court. We find original and amended findings of fact by the trial judge and direction to the clerk for the entry of judgment, but no such judgment was ever entered of record in the trial court. Rule 112 (a) R.C.P. Colo., requiring the inclusion of the judgment in the record is mandatory, and without a compliance therewith *37there is nothing for this court to review. *Savageau, Inc. v. Larsen,*117 Colo. 229, 185 (2d) 1012; *Howard v. American Law Book Co.*121 Colo. 5, 212 P. (2d) 1006. The writ of error is, therefore, dismissed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00339-CR

Eggerston L. Davis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 005268, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to possessing more than four grams of cocaine. See Tex.

Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (d) (West Supp. 2001). The district court adjudged him

guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for six years, as called for in a plea bargain

agreement. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal.

When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does not

exceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal

must state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raised

by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex.

R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant’s notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to confer

jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State, No. 03-00-00194-CR (Tex. App.—Austin April 19, 2001,

no pet.); see also Cooper v. State, No. 1100-99, slip op. at 6-8 (Tex. Crim. App. April 4, 2001).
2

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 29, 2001

Do Not Publish