alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 135700 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### MICHAEL RAY MULLINS and SUZANNE Stephen J. Markman, 

### EVA MULLINS, Justices 

### Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 135700 COA: 275340 Washtenaw CC: 06-000319-NI MATTHEW STANFORD and MARK DOYLE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.

t0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
STATE v. Kenneth Kelly DUVALL

372P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kenneth Kelly Duvall, for Duvall, Kenneth Kelly.

*599The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of March 2018 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."

Ervin, J. recused
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

May 22, 2006
#### Terry L. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-1233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 15, 2003.

*369Terry L. Young, Raiford, Pro Se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

ORFINGER,J. . .

Terry L. Young was convicted in 1985 of sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age, in violation of section 794.011(2), Florida Statutes (1983). The State appealed his sentence, and Young cross-appealed his conviction. The State obtained relief; Young did not. *State v. Young,*579 So.2d 380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). After his resentencing, Young did not appeal.

Young now appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Counting both his state and federal cases, this is his thirteenth collateral action in the courts regarding his 1985 conviction. Young’s argument this time is either the same argument he has made before in our case nos. 5D92-1110, 5D95-2285, and 5D00-333, or a slight variation thereof. As a result, this court issued a *Spencer*
      *1*
      **show cause order, asking why Young should not be denied further *pro se*access to this court for any proceedings to further attack his 1985 conviction and sentence. Young marshaled many arguments in response, none of which changes our initial conclusion that this appeal is frivolous and an abuse of process. As it has for others, the number thirteen has proven to be unlucky for Young. *See Harvey v. State,*836 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); *Johnson v. State,*652 So.2d 980, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“The number thirteen proves unlucky for petitioner.”); *see also Isley v. State,*652 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”); *O’Brien v.*State, 689 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (Criminal Appeal Reform Act of 1996 establishes intent of Legislature that the terms and conditions of collateral review and procedural bars to collateral review be strictly enforced).

Because his appeals are dissipating limited judicial resources, and we expect they will continue, Terry L. Young is prohibited from fifing with this court any further *pro se*pleadings or papers concerning Circuit Court Case No. CR85-2897. Any further pleadings or papers regarding that case will be summarily returned by the Clerk of this Court, unless that pleading or paper is filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.

. *State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999) (court can restrict future *pro se*pleadings for good cause if it first provides a *pro se*litigant notice and an opportunity to respond).
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31986L0017

**Council Directive 86/17/EEC of 27 January 1986 amending, on account of the accession of Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services***Official Journal L 027 , 01/02/1986 P. 0071 - 0071 Finnish special edition: Chapter 16 Volume 1 P. 0088  Swedish special edition: Chapter 16 Volume 1 P. 0088*

*****

COUNCIL  DIRECTIVE  

of 27 January 1986  

amending, on account of the accession of Portugal, Directive 85/384/EEC on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services  

(86/17/EEC)  

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,  

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular Article 396 thereof,  

Whereas in view of the accession of Portugal, it is necessary to make certain further technical amendments to Directive 85/384/EEC (1) as amended by Directive 85/614/EEC (2) to ensure its equal application by the Portuguese Republic and the other Member States;  

Whereas pursuant to Article 2 (3) of the Treaty of Accession of Spain and Portugal the institutions of the Community may adopt the measures referred to in Article 396 of the Act of Accession, the measures entering into force on the date of entry into force of the said Treaty,  

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:  

Article 1  

With effect from 1 January 1986, Article 11 (k) of Directive 85/384/EEC, shall be supplemented by the following:  

'- the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Higher Technical Institute of the Technical University of Lisbon (Licenciatura em engenharia civil),  

- the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Porto (Licenciatura em engenharia civil),  

- the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Coimbra (Licenciatura em engenharia civil),  

- the university diploma in civil engineering (production) awarded by the University of Minho (Licenciatura em engenharia civil (produção)).'  

Article 2  

The Member States shall take the measures necessary to comply with this Directive within the time limit specified in Article 31 (1) of Directive 85/384/EEC.  

Article 3  

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.  

Done at Brussels, 27 January 1986.  

For the Council  

The President  

H. van den BROEK  

(1) OJ No L 223, 21. 8. 1985, p. 15.  

(2) OJ No L 376, 31. 12. 1985, p. 1.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2020

No. 04-19-00119-CV

INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Michael TATSCH,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice1

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice1

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

A majority of the court has voted to GRANT Appellee’s motion for en banc 

reconsideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7. “[T]he panel’s [June 24, 2020 opinion and judgment]

does not become final, and the case will be resubmitted to the court for en banc review and 

disposition.” See Id.

Entered this 19th day of November, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:_________________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

1 Dissents from the order granting en banc reconsideration
STATE of North Carolina v. James Douglas GRIFFIN

No. COA16-972

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE ALDEA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 339 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### James C. STANLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-1556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 19, 2003.

James Stanley, Jasper, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See State v. McBride,*848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003); *Smith v. Moore,*782 So.2d 955 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

GRIFFIN, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
NC STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. The STATE of NC, et al.

110PA16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 22, 2018

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The North Carolina Rules Review Commission.

Amar Majmundar, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Special Deputy Attorney General, for The State of North Carolina.

Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Saad Gul, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, John Michael Durnovich, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina State Board of Education.

Christopher G. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Andrew Ellen, Attorney at Law, Taylor M. Dewberry, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Chamber Legal Institute, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of January 2018 by North Carolina Chamber Legal Institute, North Carolina Retail Merchants Association, and North Carolina Home Builders Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2018."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
ex4-19.htm


Exhibit 4.19


 


 


THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NOT BE SOLD OR OTHERWISE TRANFERRED OR DISPOSED OF EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN OPINION OF COUSEL SATISFACTORY TO COUNSEL TO THE COMPANY THAT AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS IS AVAILABLE.







THIS NOTE IS ONE OF A SERIES OF NOTES OF THE SAME TERMS AND TENOR THAT MAY BE ISSUED BY MAKER UP TO AN AGGREGATE OF $275,000.







POWER2SHIP, INC.







18% PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Note”)


 



	 
$75,000.00 

	December 5, 2003





 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned maker, POWER2SHIP, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”), promises to pay to the order of Jefferson Henn (the “Payee”), the principal sum of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS and Zero CENTS ($75,000.00) in full on or before December 1, 2004 (the “Due Date”). The outstanding balance of the Note shall earn interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable in arrears on each monthly anniversary of this Note until it is repaid.







Maker shall be entitled to repay this Note, in whole or in part, at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Maker shall be required to prepay the Note before the Due Date out of the proceeds to be received by the Maker from the initial closing of Maker’s offering of Convertible Debentures, which is expected to commence in December 2003. Such prepayment shall be made directly from the closing proceeds and paid from escrow.







In addition, Payee shall receive two (2) stock certificates each of which shall represent Twenty Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-Five (20,455) shares of Maker’s common stock (“Shares”). In the event Maker prepays the outstanding balance of the Note, and the interest accrued thereon, within fifteen (15) days hereof, then one (1) of the aforementioned stock certificates shall be cancelled. Unless the Shares are covered by an effective registration statement, the Shares shall be “restricted securities” as that term is defined in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The certificate representing such shares shall bear the following or a similar legend:







These securities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any state securities laws and may not be sold or otherwise transferred or disposed of except pursuant to an effective registration statement under any applicable federal and state securities laws, or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to counsel to the corporation that an exemption from registration is available.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Power Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Glatfelter, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  July 16, 2007

By:  /s/ Diane Glatfelter

Name:  Diane Glatfelter

Title:    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of Town Sports InternationalHoldings, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town SportsInternational Holdings, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; and
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;
     5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the designor operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting;
Date: November 10, 2004   By: /s/ Robert Giardina   Robert Giardina *Chief Executive Officer* *Office of the President*
10-Q 2 

 

 

**Section 906 CEO Certification**

** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Monahan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
    -  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
    -  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

       

 

| /s/ David Monahan |
|-------------------|

David Monahan

Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: August 13, 2010     

 

 

 

----
STATE v. Marvin Everett MILLER, Jr.

217P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 3, 2017

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Marvin Everette (Jr.)

David J. Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of July 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of July 2017."
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Enzo Taddei, certify that:

         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of Logica Holdings Inc.;

1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

3. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: March 27th, 2008.




/s/ Enzo Taddei
---------------------------
Name: Enzo Taddei
Chief Financial Officer
VOGLER REYNOLDA ROAD, LLC v. SCI NORTH CAROLINA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC.

312A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2017

Anthony T. Lathrop, Attorney at Law, Glenn E. Ketner, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for SCI North Carolina Funeral Services, Inc.

John M. Martin, Attorney at Law, Mary V. Cavanagh, Attorney at Law, Winterville, for Vogler Reynolda Road, LLC.

John M. Martin, Attorney at Law, Winterville.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of December 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 23rd day of January 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.