alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BARBARA TIANO,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND PMA 

MANAGEMENT CORP. (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 287 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision conflicts with this Court’s 

decisions, such as City of Erie v. WCAB (Annunziata), 838 A.2d 598, 602-

03 (Pa. 2003), Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh, 11 A.3d 960 (Pa. 2011), Stermel 

v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 103 A.3d 

876 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014), and Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers’ Comp. 

Appeal Bd. (Bushta), 184 A.3d 958, 969 (Pa. 2018), because a self-insured, 

government entity, is prohibited from subrogating Heart and Lung Benefits 

Act Benefits from a third-party settlement received by [Petitioner], an 

employee, who was injured in the line of duty as a Philadelphia Police officer 

in a non-motor vehicle case[.] 

Additionally, the parties are directed to address the statutory basis for subrogation 

under 77 P.S. § 671, as well as the application of Topelski v. Universal S. Side Autos, 

Inc., 180 A.2d 414 (Pa. 1962), to non-motor vehicle accident cases in light of the recent 

line of aforementioned cases involving motor vehicle accidents.
#### Kenneth McINTYRE & Similarly Situated Persons, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & Robert D. Shannon, Superintendent, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 23, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2003, the above-captioned appeal is quashed for failure to file a brief.
STATE of North Carolina v. Adrian Lamont BONEY, Defendant.

No. COA17-549

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
#### Michael J. ZWICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-1850.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 2003.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 2003.

Michael J. Zwick, Daytona Beach, Pro Se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Alvarez v. State,*358 So.2d 10 (Fla.1978).

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD01-05-092] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the P.J. McArdle Bridge, mile 0.3, across the Chelsea River between East Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts. Under this temporary deviation the bridge may remain closed from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., on October 24, 2005 and October 27, 2005. This temporary deviation is necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from October 24, 2005 through October 27, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, at (617) 223-8364. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The P.J. McArdle Bridge has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 21 feet at mean high water and 30 feet at mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.593. 

The owner of the bridge, the City of Boston, requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance, bearing replacement. 

Under this temporary deviation the P.J. McArdle Bridge may remain closed from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., on October 24, 2005 and October 27, 2005. 

This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35, and will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. 

Dated: September 23, 2005. 

Gary Kassof, 

Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 05-19947 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4464 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4464

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the look-
   through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign 
                             corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

Mr. Boustany (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Reed, Mr. Schock, Ms. Jenkins, 
   Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Young of 
Indiana, Mr. Matheson, and Mr. Crowley) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the look-
   through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign 
                             corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN RELATED 
              CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (6) of section 954(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subparagraph (C).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 
2013, and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within 
which such taxable years of foreign corporations end.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Humberto José Rocha Braz, Chief Executive Officer

I, Humberto José Rocha Braz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and

(iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: June 14, 2005

| | /s/ Humberto José Rocha Braz     
| | ---------------------------------
| | Humberto José Rocha Braz         
| | Chief Executive Officer          
| | Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Dennis M. Terry, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Darlene F. McDonald, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, of First Clover Leaf Financial Corp. (Company) each certify in their capacity as an officer of the Company that they have reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (Report) and that to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 
|                         | By:    | /s/   Dennis M. Terry                               |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Dennis   M. Terry                                   |
|                         |   | President   and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                         |   |                                                |
|                         |   |                                                |
|                         | By:    | /s/   Darlene F. McDonald                           |
|                         |   | Darlene   F. McDonald                               |
|                         |   | Senior   Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   |                                                |
| Date:   August 14, 2012 |   |                                                |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert Earl, asa Manager and Principal Executive Officer of BH/RE, L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”),certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

 (A)  theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(B)  the informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: November 14, 2005

 

 
|   | /S/ Robert Earl                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Robert Earl                           |
|   | Manager (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4404 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4404

To direct the Attorney General to acquire data, for each calendar year, 
   about sexual offenses, including rape, that occur aboard aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2014

 Mr. Crawford (for himself and Mr. Griffin of Arkansas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Attorney General to acquire data, for each calendar year, 
   about sexual offenses, including rape, that occur aboard aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sexual Assault Reporting on Aircraft 
Act of 2014'' or the ``SARA Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. STATISTICS RELATING TO SEXUAL OFFENSES THAT OCCUR ABOARD 
              AIRCRAFT.

    Under the authority of section 534 of title 28, United States Code, 
the Attorney General shall acquire data, for each calendar year, about 
sexual offenses, including rape, that occur aboard aircraft.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6592

SHERRICK S. HALSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN R. PATE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(0:11-cv-00702-TLW)

Submitted: August 20, 2012 Decided: August 28, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherrick S. Halsey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sherrick S. Halsey seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Halsey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Robert VICKERS, Defendant.

No. COA18-35

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 18, 2018

DISMISSED AS MOOT.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4656 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve access to mental health 

services under the TRICARE program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2014 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mrs. CAPPS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve access 

to mental health services under the TRICARE program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Caring for America’s 

5 Heroes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH 

7 SERVICES UNDER THE TRICARE PROGRAM. 

8 (a) ELIMINATION OF LIMIT ON DAYS OF INPATIENT

9 SERVICES.—Section 1079 of title 10, United States Code, 

10 is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4656 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking paragraph (6); and 

3 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (7) 

4 through (17) as paragraphs (6) through (16), 

5 respectively; 

6 (2) by striking subsection (i); and 

7 (3) by redesignating subsections (j) through (q) 

8 as subsections (i) through (p), respectively. 

9 (b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR NONAVAIL10 ABILITY STATEMENT OR PREAUTHORIZATION.—Section 

11 721(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Author12 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) 

13 is amended by striking ‘‘(other than mental health serv14 ices)’’. 

15 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 55 of title 

16 10, United States Code, is amended— 

17 (1) in section 1079(e)(7), by striking ‘‘sub18 section (a)(13)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(12)’’; 

19 (2) in section 1086— 

20 (A) in subsection (d)(4)(A)(ii), by striking 

21 ‘‘section 1079(j)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

22 1079(i)(1)’’; and 

23 (B) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘Section 

24 1079(j)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 1079(i)’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4656 IH

1 (3) in section 1105(c), by striking ‘‘section 

2 1079(a)(7)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1079(a)(6)’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
THOMAS & CRADDOCK SALES, INC., a North Carolina Corporation, Plaintiff, v. GIFT BAG LADY, INC., d/b/a Bag Lady, a California Corporation, Defendant.

No. COA16-936

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4530 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards of up to $5,000,000 

for information regarding the attacks on the United States diplomatic 

mission at Benghazi, Libya, that began on September 11, 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself and Mr. HUELSKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards of up 

to $5,000,000 for information regarding the attacks on 

the United States diplomatic mission at Benghazi, Libya, 

that began on September 11, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 In accordance with the Rewards for Justice program 

5 authorized under section 36 of the State Department 

6 Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708), the Sec7 retary of State shall offer a reward of not more than 

8 $5,000,000 to individuals who furnish information— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4530 IH

1 (1) regarding the attacks on the United States 

2 diplomatic mission at Benghazi, Libya, that began 

3 on September 11, 2012; or 

4 (2) leading to the capture of an individual who 

5 committed, conspired to commit, attempted to com6 mit, or aided in the commission of the attacks de7 scribed in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 97-4363WM

______________

Premier Bank and Sunwest Bank of *

Clovis, N.A., *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court for

* the Western District of

Thomas W. Tierney, Tierney & Ernst, * Missouri.

KMPG Peat, Marwick, Wright, Herfordt *

& Sanders, Harold E. Card, Carl E. * [To be published.]

Wright, Ira W. Palmer, and John P. *

Redd, *

*

Appellees. * 

___________

Submitted: September 21, 1998

Filed: October 2, 1998

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM. 

This is an action for negligence against directors, accountants, and attorneys for

a group of companies known as the Midwestern Companies. The plaintiffs are the

owners of certain industrial revenue bonds and coupons sold by certain municipalities
The Hon. Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri. 

-2-

and guaranteed by the Midwestern Companies. The District Court held that the action 1

was barred by the statute of limitations, Mo. Ann. Stat. §516.100, and dismissed the

complaint as to eight of the ten named defendants. The Court later entered judgment

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), thus making its decision appealable. 

We affirm. We have nothing of substance to add to the well-reasoned opinion

of the District Court. 

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S.COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of Neal M. SHER, Esquire A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

No. 03-BG-841.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Aug. 28, 2003.

Before: RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges; and KERN, Senior Judge. •

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Neal M. Sher, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the *1263Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 28th day of August, 2003,

ORDERED that the said Neal M. Sher is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment should run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.