alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120692),   2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782),  3) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211),  4) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),  5) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282) ,  6) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592),  7) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571) of Liberty Property Trust andLiberty Property Limited Partnership, and  8) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-14139),  9) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32244),  10) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-53297),  11) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63115),  12) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37218),  13) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45032),  14) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62504),  15) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62506),  16) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63494),  17) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63978),  18) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-91702),  19) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107482),  20) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-108040),  21) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-114609),  22) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-118994),  23) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130948),  24) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125572), and  25) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-122365) of Liberty Property Trust and in therelated Prospectuses, and  26) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118995) pertaining to the Liberty PropertyTrust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan of our reports dated February 23, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liberty PropertyTrust, Liberty Property Trust management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Liberty Property Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
#### Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance Company, Appellant, v John Fatsis et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[718 NYS2d 95]

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendants John Fatsis and William Fatsis in an underlying action entitled *Condon v Fatsis,*pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 97-025162, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated September 30, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the Fatsis defendants which was for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the plaintiff is obligated to defend them in the underlying action.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion of the Fatsis defendants which was for partial summáry judgment is denied, upon searching the record, summary judgment is awarded to the appellant, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the respondents in the underlying action.

The Supreme Court erred in awarding partial summary judgment to the defendants John Fatsis and William Fatsis on the issue of whether the plaintiff is obligated to defend them in the underlying personal injury action. Those defendants failed to provide the plaintiff with notice of the underlying incident within a reasonable time after the occurrence, in violation of the policy requirements, and failed to demonstrate the existence of a good faith belief in nonliability *(see, Matter of State Farm Ins. Co. v Archer,*256 AD2d 348; *Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v Mendez,*253 AD2d 790; *Metropolitan N. Y. Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty v National Union Ins. Co.,*222 *451AD2d 420; *Zadrima v PSM Ins. Cos.,*208 AD2d 529; *Winstead v Uniondale Union Free School Dist.,*201 AD2d 721). Moreover, the underlying incident was an intentional assault that falls within the exclusionary language of the policy *(see, Sphere Drake Ins. Co. v Block 7206 Corp.,*265 AD2d 78; *Harmann v Allstate Ins. Co.,*260 AD2d 544; *Mattress Discounters v United States Fire Ins. Co.,*251 AD2d 384). Accordingly, upon searching the record, we grant summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment making the appropriate declaration *(see, Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334, *appeal dismissed*371 US 74, *cert denied*371 US 901). S. Miller, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 316 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4464 

[Report No. 113–428] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the lookthrough treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself, Mr. KIND, Mr. REED, Mr. SCHOCK, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

YOUNG of Indiana, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

MAY 2, 2014 

Additional sponsor: Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California 

MAY 2, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4464 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the look-through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4464 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS 

4 BETWEEN RELATED CONTROLLED FOREIGN 

5 CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (6) of section 954(c) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik8 ing subparagraph (C). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years of foreign corpora11 tions beginning after December 31, 2013, and to taxable 

12 years of United States shareholders with or within which 

13 such taxable years of foreign corporations end. 

14 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

15 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent CFC Look16 Through Act of 2014’’. 

17 SEC. 2. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS BE18 TWEEN RELATED CONTROLLED FOREIGN 

19 CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (6) of section 954(c) of 

21 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

22 subparagraph (C). 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this 

24 section shall apply to taxable years of foreign corporations 

25 beginning after December 31, 2013, and to taxable years 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4464 RH

1 of United States shareholders with or within which such 

2 taxable years of foreign corporations end. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 316 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4464 

[Report No. 113–428] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

porations. payments between related controlled foreign cormake permanent the look-through treatment of 

MAY 2, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the Matter of: I.T.

No. COA15-1342

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57876-57877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Consumer Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, October 27, 
2005. The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take 
place at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, DC, in 
Dining Room E on the Terrace level of the Martin Building. Anyone 
planning to attend the meeting should, for security purposes, register 
no later than Tuesday, October 25, by completing the form found online 
at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/secure/forms/cacregistration.cfm.
    Additionally, attendees must present photo identification to enter 
the building.
    The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 1 
p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, NW., between 20th and 
21st Streets.
    The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of 
the Board's responsibilities under various consumer financial services 
laws and on other matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time 
permitting, the Council will discuss the following topics:
    Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Issues related to the use of the new 
pricing data by financial institutions and resulting changes in 
policies and procedures.
    Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996. 
Industry proposals to revise financial services laws to reduce 
compliance costs.
    Mortgage Loans. Issues concerning nontraditional loan products, 
including risk management and consumer disclosures.
    Hurricane Katrina. Short-term and long-term issues and challenges 
for financial institutions.
    Committee Reports. Council committees will report on their work. 
Other matters initiated by Council members also may be discussed.

[[Page 57877]]

    Persons wishing to submit views to the Council on any of the above 
topics may do so by sending written statements to Ann Bistay, Secretary 
of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and Community 
Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, 
DC 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained from Ms. 
Bistay, 202-452-6470.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 28, 
2005.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19781 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Charles JACOBS

No. COA17-539

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

VACATED. REMANDED. REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.
# C_2008037EN.01000701.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 21 November 2007 — Luigi Scarpelli v NEOS Banca SpA

(Case C-509/07)

(2008/C 37/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bergamo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Luigi Scarpelli

Applicant:

Defendant: NEOS Banca SpA

Defendant:

Question referred

‘Is Article 11(2) of Council Directive 102/87/EEC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an agreement between a supplier and a grantor of credit whereunder credit is made available exclusively by that grantor of credit to customers of that supplier is a necessary condition for the consumer's right to pursue remedies against the grantor of credit — where the supplier is in breach of contract — even where that right is (a) only to termination of the credit agreement; or (b) to termination of the agreement and consequently to reimbursement of the sums paid to the grantor of credit?’

1

---

(1)  OJ L 42, p. 48.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|June 11, 2004
Exhibit 10.1 Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units




	
		
	Notice of Grant of Award
and Award Agreement
	Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
ID: 84-0846841
1625 Sharp Point Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525 
(970) 221-4670 






	
			
	NAME
ADDRESS
 
	Award Number:
Plan:
ID: 
	 








You have been granted an award of restricted stock units.  These units are restricted until the vest date(s) shown below, at which time you will receive shares of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (the Company) common stock, subject to the terms and conditions in the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, as follows:


	
		
	 
	 

	Date of Grant:
	 

	 
	 

	Exercise Price Per Share:
	 

	 
	 

	Total Number of Shares Granted:
	 

	 
	 

	Type of Award:
	Restricted Stock Unit

	 
	 

	 
	 






The award will vest in increments on the date(s) shown.
 
	
			
	 
	Shares
	Vest Date






This award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Company's Award Plan, as amended, and the Award Agreement, all of which are attached and made a part of this document. 
 
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.


Garry Rogerson
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6764
JAMAL A. AZEEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KRISTEN KELLER, Assistant Prosecutor; LARRY FRAIL, Chief Prosecutor; RALEIGH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-96-367-5) Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: October 30, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal A. Azeez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Azeez v. Keller , No. CA-96- 367-5 (S.D.W. Va. May 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 17,570.

#### John D. Redd and Kermit Redd *v.*U. A. Small.

(283 P. [2d] 949)

Decided May 23, 1955.

Messrs. Moynihan, Hughes & Bjelland, for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Brooks & Miller, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-83768 and 33-78925 of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. and subsidiary on Form
S-8 of our report dated February 9, 2001 (March 28 as to the waiver letters
described in Note 4), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boyd Bros.
Transportation Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Boyd
Bros. Transportation Inc. and subsidiary, listed in Item 14 (a) for the years
ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 27, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 33.4-3, Instructions for Continued 
Airworthiness; Aircraft Engine High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) 
and Lightning Protection Features

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
33.4-3, Instructions for Continued Airworthiness; Aircraft Engine High 
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) and Lightning Protection Features. 
This AC sets forth acceptable methods of compliance for aircraft 
engines with the provisions of Sec.  33.4, Instructions for Continued 
Airworthiness of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 
This AC provides guidance for developing instructions for continued 
airworthiness to ensure the continued airworthiness of aircraft engine 
HIRF and Lightning protection features.

DATES: The Engine and Propeller Directorate issued Advisory Circular 
33.4-3 on September 16, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Federal Aviation Administration, 
Attn: Gary Horan, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-111, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone: (781) 
238-7164; fax: (781) 238-7199; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#254244575c0b4d4a57444b654344440b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="086f697a712660677a6966486e6969266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    We have filed in the docket all substantive comments received, and 
a report summarizing them. If you wish to review the docket in person, 
you may go to the above address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you wish to contact the 
above individual directly, you can use the above telephone number or e-
mail address provided.
    How to Obtain Copies: A paper copy of AC 33.4-3 may be obtained by 
writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent 
Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business 
Center, 3341 Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, 
or by faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC will 
also be available on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/, select 
``Regulations and Policies'' then the link titled ``Advisory 
Circulars.''

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704)

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 16, 2005.
Fran A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19598 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ohgi_ex106.htm


Exhibit 10.7


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 


13
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7870
MARK A. TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BARBARA A. SCOTT, Clerk of General Sessions Court, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3006-3-21-BC) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting themagistrate judge's recommendation on alternate reasoning and dismissing without prejudice this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). The order is not appealable because the defect onwhich the dismissal was based could be cured by amending the complaint. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal and it must be dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GENERAL
MEDIA INC'S DECEMBER 31, 1999 FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,315
<PP&E>                                           3,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                    (56,708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,304
<SALES>                                         78,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,811
<CGS>                                           36,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,969)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,390)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    671
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>