# Official Journal C 77/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 77 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 639 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 77

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 639 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 77/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 77/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 77/02 | Case C-274/14: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central — Spain) — Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Independence of the national body concerned — Irremovability of the members — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling) | 2 |
| 2020/C 77/03 | Case C-175/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency, European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (Eucope) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality) | 2 |
| 2020/C 77/04 | Case C-177/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 14 de Madrid — Spain) — Almudena Baldonedo Martín v Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Compensation if the employment relationship is terminated — Articles 151 and 153 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Difference of treatment based on whether a public or private regime, within the meaning of national law, governs the employment relationship) | 3 |
| 2020/C 77/05 | Case C-178/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality) | 4 |
| 2020/C 77/06 | Case C-578/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Energiavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3 — Consumer protection — Article 37 — Tasks and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party’ — Right to appeal against a decision of the regulatory authority — Complaint made by a household customer against an electricity distribution system operator) | 5 |
| 2020/C 77/07 | Case C-814/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 — Article 55(1) — Financial contribution by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) — Eligibility of expenditure — Condition — Expenditure actually paid by the beneficiaries — Meaning) | 5 |
| 2020/C 77/08 | Case C-29/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht — Germany) — ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Unemployment benefits — Calculation — Failure to take account of the final salary received in the Member State of residence — Reference period not of sufficient duration — Salary received following the employment relationship coming to an end — Person having previously been active as an employed person in Switzerland) | 6 |
| 2020/C 77/09 | Case C-32/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — AT v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Right of permanent residence — Acquisition before completion of a continuous period of five years of residence — Workers who, at the time they stop working, have reached the age for entitlement to an old age pension) | 7 |
| 2020/C 77/10 | Case C-506/18 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 — European Parliament v Erik Josefsson (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — European Parliament — Termination of the contract — Agreement intended to resolve the dispute between the parties — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 8 |
| 2020/C 77/11 | Case C-613/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Tributário de Lisboa — Portugal) — State of Canada v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Restrictions on the free movement of capital to or from a third country — Direct taxation — Tax on the revenue of legal persons — Profits distributed by companies resident in the territory of Portugal — Reduction in the tax base) | 8 |
| 2020/C 77/12 | Case C-47/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — HA v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(h) to (j) — Various exemptions connected with children or young persons, school or university education — Surfing and sailing courses for schools and universities — Class trip) | 9 |
| 2020/C 77/13 | Case C-813/19 PPU: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence — France) — execution of a European arrest warrant in respect of MN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Effective judicial protection) | 10 |
| 2020/C 77/14 | Case C-58/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Mykola Yanovych Azarov against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-247/17, Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union | 11 |
| 2020/C 77/15 | Case C-236/19 P: Appeal brought on 15 March 2019 by István Szécsi and Nóra Somossy against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 16 January 2019 in Case T-331/18, István Szécsi und Nóra Somossy v European Commission | 11 |
| 2020/C 77/16 | Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region | 12 |
| 2020/C 77/17 | Case C-461/19 P: Appeal brought on 7 June 2019 by All Star CV against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2019 in Case T-611/17 All Star v EUIPO — Carrefour Hypermarchés | 12 |
| 2020/C 77/18 | Case C-513/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 5 July 2019 — P. J. v (X) S.A. | 13 |
| 2020/C 77/19 | Case C-548/19 P: Appeal brought on 17 July 2019 by Laurence Bonnafous against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-614/17 Bonnafous v EACEA | 13 |
| 2020/C 77/20 | Case C-550/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2019 — EV v Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.A. and Acciona Agua, S.A. | 14 |
| 2020/C 77/21 | Case C-586/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-179/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot | 15 |
| 2020/C 77/22 | Case C-587/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-180/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot | 15 |
| 2020/C 77/23 | Case C-588/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-181/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot | 16 |
| 2020/C 77/24 | Case C-589/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-182/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot | 16 |
| 2020/C 77/25 | Case C-590/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-183/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot | 17 |
| 2020/C 77/26 | Case C-664/19 P: Appeal brought on 4 September 2019 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 26 June 2019 in Case T-117/18 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO | 17 |
| 2020/C 77/27 | Case C-761/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 — European Commission v Hungary | 17 |
| 2020/C 77/28 | Case C-805/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — CT v VINI GmbH | 19 |
| 2020/C 77/29 | Case C-810/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Flightright GmbH v Qatar Airways | 19 |
| 2020/C 77/30 | Case C-815/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 November 2019 — Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20 |
| 2020/C 77/31 | Case C-825/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2019 — Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt | 21 |
| 2020/C 77/32 | Case C-826/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 13 November 2019 — WZ v Austrian Airlines AG | 22 |
| 2020/C 77/33 | Case C-844/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 November 2019 — CS v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt | 23 |
| 2020/C 77/34 | Case C-868/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 November 2019 — M-GmbH v Finanzamt für Körperschaften | 23 |
| 2020/C 77/35 | Case C-875/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-27/18 RENV, FV v Council | 24 |
| 2020/C 77/36 | Case C-877/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-153/17, FV v Council | 25 |
| 2020/C 77/37 | Case C-894/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by the European Parliament against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 in Case T-47/18, UZ v Parliament | 26 |
| 2020/C 77/38 | Case C-896/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru | 27 |
| 2020/C 77/39 | Case C-905/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 11 December 2019 — EP v Kreis Groß-Gerau | 28 |
| 2020/C 77/40 | Case C-927/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 18 December 2019 — ‘Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras’ UAB, other parties: ‘Ecoservice Klaipėda’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos autobusų parkas’ UAB, ‘Parsekas’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos transportas’ UAB | 28 |
| 2020/C 77/41 | Case C-930/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers (Belgium) lodged on 20 December 2019 — X v Belgian State | 30 |
| 2020/C 77/42 | Case C-940/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 30 December 2019 — Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France, Confédération des Syndicats médicaux français, Fédération des Syndicats pharmaceutiques de France, Syndicat des Biologistes, Syndicat des Médecins libéraux, Union dentaire, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Chirurgiens-Dentistes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Masseurs-Kinésithérapeutes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Infirmiers v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation, Premier ministre | 31 |
| 2020/C 77/43 | Case C-948/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 31 December 2019 — UAB ‘Manpower Lit’ v E.S., M.L., M.P., V.V. and R.V. | 32 |
| 2020/C 77/44 | Case C-950/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 December 2019 — A | 33 |
| 2020/C 77/45 | Case C-3/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rīgas rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 7 January 2020 — Criminal proceedings against AB, CE, SIA ‘MM investīcijas’ | 33 |
| 2020/C 77/46 | Case C-4/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 January 2020 — ‘Alti’ OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Plovdiv pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite | 34 |
| 2020/C 77/47 | Case C-24/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 – European Commission v Council of the European Union | 35 |
| 2020/C 77/48 | Case C-115/18: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Saint-Brieuc — Chambre détachée de Guingamp — France) — Procureur de la République v Tugdual Carluer, Yann Latouche, Dominique Legeard, Thierry Leleu, Dimitri Pinschof, Brigitte Plunian, Rozenn Marechal | 36 |
| 2020/C 77/49 | Case C-297/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by Humbert Jörg Köfler, Wolfgang Leitner, Joachim Schönbeck, Wolfgang Semper v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal, interested party: Finanzpolizei | 36 |
| 2020/C 77/50 | Case C-712/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, AR, BS v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei | 37 |
| 2020/C 77/51 | Case C-713/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, BS, AR v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei | 37 |
| 2020/C 77/52 | Case C-138/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei | 37 |
| 2020/C 77/53 | Case C-139/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY | 38 |
| 2020/C 77/54 | Case C-154/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Eparchiako Dikastirio Larnakas — Cyprus) — Kypriaki Kentriki Archi v GA | 38 |
| 2020/C 77/55 | Case C-227/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DX v Bürgermeister der Stadt Graz, interested party: Finanzpolizei | 38 |
| 2020/C 77/56 | Case C-334/19: Order of the President of the Court of 18 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF | 39 |
| 2020/C 77/57 | Case C-672/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers — Belgium) — X v État belge | 39 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 77/58 | Joined Cases T-786/16 and T-224/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — PV v Commission (Civil service — Civil servants — Psychological harassment — Bundle of decisions adopted by the Commission adversely affecting the applicant — Applications for assistance — Disciplinary procedure — Revocation — Withdrawal of the revocation — New disciplinary procedure — Fresh revocation) | 40 |
| 2020/C 77/59 | Case T-168/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetrieb v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the administrative procedure concerning alleged State aid implemented by the Austrian authorities in favour to concession holders pursuant to the law on gaming — Refusal to grant access — Plea relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Overriding public interest — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality) | 41 |
| 2020/C 77/60 | Case T-19/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data) | 42 |
| 2020/C 77/61 | Case T-292/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Portugal — Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Definition of national courts) | 43 |
| 2020/C 77/62 | Case T-402/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aquino and Others v Parliament (Civil service — Strike action by interpreters — Measures for the requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — No legal basis — Liability — Non-material damage) | 43 |
| 2020/C 77/63 | Case T-598/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Grupo Textil Brownie v EUIPO — The Guide Association (BROWNIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark BROWNIE — Earlier national word marks BROWNIES, BROWNIE, Brownies and Brownie — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 44 |
| 2020/C 77/64 | Case T-697/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO — Titlbach (ALTISPORT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALTISPORT — Earlier international and EU word marks ALDI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods and services — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 45 |
| 2020/C 77/65 | Case T-42/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Volkswagen v EUIPO (CROSS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark CROSS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1)of Regulation 2017/1001) | 46 |
| 2020/C 77/66 | Case T-239/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Vinos de Arganza v EUIPO — Nordbrand Nordhausen (ENCANTO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ENCANTO — Earlier national word mark BELCANTO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 47 |
| 2020/C 77/67 | Case T-336/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — BZ v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal for obviously inadequate work — Proportionality — Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Liability) | 47 |
| 2020/C 77/68 | Case T-559/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Julius Sämann v EUIPO — Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a tree — Earlier EU and international figurative marks representing an ‘arbre magique’ (magic tree) — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 48 |
| 2020/C 77/69 | Case T-751/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Daimler v Commission (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of certified CO2 savings — Eco-innovations scheme — Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility) | 49 |
| 2020/C 77/70 | Case T-125/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 50 |
| 2020/C 77/71 | Case T-128/19: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2020 — Hemp Foods Australia v EUIPO — Cabrejos (Sativa) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility) | 50 |
| 2020/C 77/72 | Case T-161/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Deutsche Telekom v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicant not individually concerned — Inadmissibility) | 51 |
| 2020/C 77/73 | Case T-162/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicants not individually concerned — Inadmissibility) | 52 |
| 2020/C 77/74 | Case T-671/19: Action brought on 1 October 2019 – Qualcomm v Commission | 53 |
| 2020/C 77/75 | Case T-870/19: Action brought on 20 December 2019 – Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO – Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN) | 54 |
| 2020/C 77/76 | Case T-3/20: Action brought on 3 January 2020 — Forbo Financial Services v EUIPO — Windmöller (Canoleum) | 55 |
| 2020/C 77/77 | Case T-8/20: Action brought on 8 January 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission | 56 |
| 2020/C 77/78 | Case T-32/20: Action brought on 14 January 2020 — Buxadé Villalba and Others v Parliament | 56 |
| 2020/C 77/79 | Case T-34/20: Action brought on 20 January 2020 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission | 58 |
| 2020/C 77/80 | Case T-38/20: Action brought on 23 January 2020 – Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) | 59 |
| 2020/C 77/81 | Case T-41/20: Action brought on 24 January 2020 — Di Bernardo v Commission | 60 |
| 2020/C 77/82 | Case T-45/20: Action brought on 27 January 2020 – KRBL v EUIPO – P.K. Overseas (INDIA SALAM Pure Basmati Rice) | 60 |
| 2020/C 77/83 | Case T-35/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — La Marchesiana v EUIPO — Marchesi 1824 (MARCHESI) | 61 |
| 2020/C 77/84 | Case T-139/18: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2020 — Avio v Commission | 62 |
| 2020/C 77/85 | Case T-606/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Bartolomé Alvarado and Grupo Preciados Place v EUIPO — Alpargatas (ALPARGATUS PASOS ARTESANALES) | 62 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 77/02

Case C-274/14: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central — Spain) — Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Independence of the national body concerned — Irremovability of the members — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

2

2020/C 77/03

Case C-175/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency, European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (Eucope) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)

2

2020/C 77/04

Case C-177/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 14 de Madrid — Spain) — Almudena Baldonedo Martín v Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Compensation if the employment relationship is terminated — Articles 151 and 153 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Difference of treatment based on whether a public or private regime, within the meaning of national law, governs the employment relationship)

3

2020/C 77/05

Case C-178/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)

4

2020/C 77/06

Case C-578/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Energiavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3 — Consumer protection — Article 37 — Tasks and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party’ — Right to appeal against a decision of the regulatory authority — Complaint made by a household customer against an electricity distribution system operator)

5

2020/C 77/07

Case C-814/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 — Article 55(1) — Financial contribution by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) — Eligibility of expenditure — Condition — Expenditure actually paid by the beneficiaries — Meaning)

5

2020/C 77/08

Case C-29/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht — Germany) — ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Unemployment benefits — Calculation — Failure to take account of the final salary received in the Member State of residence — Reference period not of sufficient duration — Salary received following the employment relationship coming to an end — Person having previously been active as an employed person in Switzerland)

6

2020/C 77/09

Case C-32/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — AT v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Right of permanent residence — Acquisition before completion of a continuous period of five years of residence — Workers who, at the time they stop working, have reached the age for entitlement to an old age pension)

7

2020/C 77/10

Case C-506/18 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 — European Parliament v Erik Josefsson (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — European Parliament — Termination of the contract — Agreement intended to resolve the dispute between the parties — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

8

2020/C 77/11

Case C-613/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Tributário de Lisboa — Portugal) — State of Canada v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Restrictions on the free movement of capital to or from a third country — Direct taxation — Tax on the revenue of legal persons — Profits distributed by companies resident in the territory of Portugal — Reduction in the tax base)

8

2020/C 77/12

Case C-47/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — HA v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(h) to (j) — Various exemptions connected with children or young persons, school or university education — Surfing and sailing courses for schools and universities — Class trip)

9

2020/C 77/13

Case C-813/19 PPU: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence — France) — execution of a European arrest warrant in respect of MN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Effective judicial protection)

10

2020/C 77/14

Case C-58/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Mykola Yanovych Azarov against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-247/17, Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union

11

2020/C 77/15

Case C-236/19 P: Appeal brought on 15 March 2019 by István Szécsi and Nóra Somossy against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 16 January 2019 in Case T-331/18, István Szécsi und Nóra Somossy v European Commission

11

2020/C 77/16

Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region

12

2020/C 77/17

Case C-461/19 P: Appeal brought on 7 June 2019 by All Star CV against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2019 in Case T-611/17 All Star v EUIPO — Carrefour Hypermarchés

12

2020/C 77/18

Case C-513/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 5 July 2019 — P. J. v (X) S.A.

13

2020/C 77/19

Case C-548/19 P: Appeal brought on 17 July 2019 by Laurence Bonnafous against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-614/17 Bonnafous v EACEA

13

2020/C 77/20

Case C-550/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2019 — EV v Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.A. and Acciona Agua, S.A.

14

2020/C 77/21

Case C-586/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-179/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

15

2020/C 77/22

Case C-587/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-180/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

15

2020/C 77/23

Case C-588/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-181/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

16

2020/C 77/24

Case C-589/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-182/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

16

2020/C 77/25

Case C-590/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-183/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

17

2020/C 77/26

Case C-664/19 P: Appeal brought on 4 September 2019 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 26 June 2019 in Case T-117/18 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO

17

2020/C 77/27

Case C-761/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 — European Commission v Hungary

17

2020/C 77/28

Case C-805/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — CT v VINI GmbH

19

2020/C 77/29

Case C-810/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Flightright GmbH v Qatar Airways

19

2020/C 77/30

Case C-815/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 November 2019 — Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

20

2020/C 77/31

Case C-825/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2019 — Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt

21

2020/C 77/32

Case C-826/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 13 November 2019 — WZ v Austrian Airlines AG

22

2020/C 77/33

Case C-844/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 November 2019 — CS v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt

23

2020/C 77/34

Case C-868/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 November 2019 — M-GmbH v Finanzamt für Körperschaften

23

2020/C 77/35

Case C-875/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-27/18 RENV, FV v Council

24

2020/C 77/36

Case C-877/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-153/17, FV v Council

25

2020/C 77/37

Case C-894/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by the European Parliament against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 in Case T-47/18, UZ v Parliament

26

2020/C 77/38

Case C-896/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru

27

2020/C 77/39

Case C-905/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 11 December 2019 — EP v Kreis Groß-Gerau

28

2020/C 77/40

Case C-927/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 18 December 2019 — ‘Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras’ UAB, other parties: ‘Ecoservice Klaipėda’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos autobusų parkas’ UAB, ‘Parsekas’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos transportas’ UAB

28

2020/C 77/41

Case C-930/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers (Belgium) lodged on 20 December 2019 — X v Belgian State

30

2020/C 77/42

Case C-940/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 30 December 2019 — Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France, Confédération des Syndicats médicaux français, Fédération des Syndicats pharmaceutiques de France, Syndicat des Biologistes, Syndicat des Médecins libéraux, Union dentaire, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Chirurgiens-Dentistes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Masseurs-Kinésithérapeutes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Infirmiers v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation, Premier ministre

31

2020/C 77/43

Case C-948/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 31 December 2019 — UAB ‘Manpower Lit’ v E.S., M.L., M.P., V.V. and R.V.

32

2020/C 77/44

Case C-950/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 December 2019 — A

33

2020/C 77/45

Case C-3/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rīgas rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 7 January 2020 — Criminal proceedings against AB, CE, SIA ‘MM investīcijas’

33

2020/C 77/46

Case C-4/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 January 2020 — ‘Alti’ OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Plovdiv pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

34

2020/C 77/47

Case C-24/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 – European Commission v Council of the European Union

35

2020/C 77/48

Case C-115/18: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Saint-Brieuc — Chambre détachée de Guingamp — France) — Procureur de la République v Tugdual Carluer, Yann Latouche, Dominique Legeard, Thierry Leleu, Dimitri Pinschof, Brigitte Plunian, Rozenn Marechal

36

2020/C 77/49

Case C-297/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by Humbert Jörg Köfler, Wolfgang Leitner, Joachim Schönbeck, Wolfgang Semper v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal, interested party: Finanzpolizei

36

2020/C 77/50

Case C-712/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, AR, BS v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei

37

2020/C 77/51

Case C-713/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, BS, AR v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei

37

2020/C 77/52

Case C-138/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei

37

2020/C 77/53

Case C-139/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY

38

2020/C 77/54

Case C-154/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Eparchiako Dikastirio Larnakas — Cyprus) — Kypriaki Kentriki Archi v GA

38

2020/C 77/55

Case C-227/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DX v Bürgermeister der Stadt Graz, interested party: Finanzpolizei

38

2020/C 77/56

Case C-334/19: Order of the President of the Court of 18 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF

39

2020/C 77/57

Case C-672/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers — Belgium) — X v État belge

39

General Court

2020/C 77/58

Joined Cases T-786/16 and T-224/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — PV v Commission (Civil service — Civil servants — Psychological harassment — Bundle of decisions adopted by the Commission adversely affecting the applicant — Applications for assistance — Disciplinary procedure — Revocation — Withdrawal of the revocation — New disciplinary procedure — Fresh revocation)

40

2020/C 77/59

Case T-168/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetrieb v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the administrative procedure concerning alleged State aid implemented by the Austrian authorities in favour to concession holders pursuant to the law on gaming — Refusal to grant access — Plea relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Overriding public interest — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality)

41

2020/C 77/60

Case T-19/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data)

42

2020/C 77/61

Case T-292/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Portugal — Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Definition of national courts)

43

2020/C 77/62

Case T-402/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aquino and Others v Parliament (Civil service — Strike action by interpreters — Measures for the requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — No legal basis — Liability — Non-material damage)

43

2020/C 77/63

Case T-598/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Grupo Textil Brownie v EUIPO — The Guide Association (BROWNIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark BROWNIE — Earlier national word marks BROWNIES, BROWNIE, Brownies and Brownie — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

44

2020/C 77/64

Case T-697/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO — Titlbach (ALTISPORT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALTISPORT — Earlier international and EU word marks ALDI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods and services — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

45

2020/C 77/65

Case T-42/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Volkswagen v EUIPO (CROSS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark CROSS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1)of Regulation 2017/1001)

46

2020/C 77/66

Case T-239/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Vinos de Arganza v EUIPO — Nordbrand Nordhausen (ENCANTO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ENCANTO — Earlier national word mark BELCANTO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

47

2020/C 77/67

Case T-336/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — BZ v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal for obviously inadequate work — Proportionality — Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Liability)

47

2020/C 77/68

Case T-559/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Julius Sämann v EUIPO — Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a tree — Earlier EU and international figurative marks representing an ‘arbre magique’ (magic tree) — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

48

2020/C 77/69

Case T-751/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Daimler v Commission (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of certified CO2 savings — Eco-innovations scheme — Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility)

49

2020/C 77/70

Case T-125/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

50

2020/C 77/71

Case T-128/19: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2020 — Hemp Foods Australia v EUIPO — Cabrejos (Sativa) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility)

50

2020/C 77/72

Case T-161/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Deutsche Telekom v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicant not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

51

2020/C 77/73

Case T-162/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicants not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

52

2020/C 77/74

Case T-671/19: Action brought on 1 October 2019 – Qualcomm v Commission

53

2020/C 77/75

Case T-870/19: Action brought on 20 December 2019 – Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO – Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN)

54

2020/C 77/76

Case T-3/20: Action brought on 3 January 2020 — Forbo Financial Services v EUIPO — Windmöller (Canoleum)

55

2020/C 77/77

Case T-8/20: Action brought on 8 January 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission

56

2020/C 77/78

Case T-32/20: Action brought on 14 January 2020 — Buxadé Villalba and Others v Parliament

56

2020/C 77/79

Case T-34/20: Action brought on 20 January 2020 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission

58

2020/C 77/80

Case T-38/20: Action brought on 23 January 2020 – Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24)

59

2020/C 77/81

Case T-41/20: Action brought on 24 January 2020 — Di Bernardo v Commission

60

2020/C 77/82

Case T-45/20: Action brought on 27 January 2020 – KRBL v EUIPO – P.K. Overseas (INDIA SALAM Pure Basmati Rice)

60

2020/C 77/83

Case T-35/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — La Marchesiana v EUIPO — Marchesi 1824 (MARCHESI)

61

2020/C 77/84

Case T-139/18: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2020 — Avio v Commission

62

2020/C 77/85

Case T-606/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Bartolomé Alvarado and Grupo Preciados Place v EUIPO — Alpargatas (ALPARGATUS PASOS ARTESANALES)

62

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN