alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129517 & (13) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 129517 

 COA: 263604 

Saginaw CC: 85-006602-FH 

FELTON WOODS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand is 

DENIED. 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Tidwell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: December 15, 2014  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 72 (“IEC TC 72”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 72, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of IEC TC 72's standards development activities are: related to automatic electrical control devices used in household and some industrial products. IEC TC 72 currently maintains a series of IEC 60730 standards dealing with requirements for components used in different types of control devices including relays, valves, sensors, actuators, locks and the like. The                           ( print page 5486)                        standards developed by IEC TC 72 are published by NEMA.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-1982  Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Section 906 CFO Certification



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Schaffhauser, Executive Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/s/    ROBERT
SCHAFFHAUSER         
|Robert Schaffhauser                
|Executive Vice President of Finance
|                                   
|November 11, 2005
Exhibit 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Debra K. Harlow, Chief
Financial Officer of Third Century Bancorp,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          Third Century Bancorp.




/s/ Debra K. Harlow
-----------------------------
Debra K. Harlow
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 11, 2004


The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00359

- CR

BENJAMIN ROBERT BARR AN , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1401264

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was indicted for fraudulent use of identifying information

. Pursuant to a charge bargain, the State agreed to dismiss four other charges in exchange for appellant’s guilty plea to the indicted charge . The trial court sentenced appellant to twenty years in prison. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
Because this is a charge

- bargain cas e, appellant has the right to appeal under2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. St ate , 297 S.W.3d 338, 340

– 41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Shankle v. State , 119 S.W.3d 808, 812

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that charge bargain that “effectively puts a cap on punishment” is a bargain governed by rule of appellate procedure 25.2( a)(2)). The record does not reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any pretrial motions that could be appealed. Therefor e , we lack jurisdiction over appellant ’ s appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Donovan

Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P

. 47.2( b).
#### Lynne M. TOEMMES, Appellant, v. Dorothy E. SITES, Appellee.

No. 3D02-43.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 11, 2003.

Reconsideration and Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 2003.

A.P. Walter; and Michael R. Seward, for appellant.

Reimer & Rosenthal, and David H. Reimer, Miami; and Michael J. Getelman, Miami, for appellee.

Before SHEVIN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Lynne M. Toemmes appeals from a final judgment awarding fees, damages, and costs to Dorothy E. Sites pursuant to sec*473tions 64.081 and 57.105, Florida Statutes (2000). We affirm the award of attorney’s fees and costs in Sites’ favor, but remand for the proper allocation of fees awarded pursuant to section 57.105. The final judgment should reflect that the fees are “to be paid to the prevailing party in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing party’s attorney.” *See*§ 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2000).
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Bickerton LANE, Jr.

No. COA17-451

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NO PLAIN ERROR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2015

No. 04-15-00777-CV

IN RE Cassandra L. LEIJA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On December 10, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the 

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may 

file a response to the petition in this court no later than January 20, 2016. Any such 

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on December 23, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-08-27732-CV, styled In the Interest of J.J.C., A Child, pending in 

the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas, the Honorable Spencer Whitewood Brown presiding.
EXHIBIT 11


             Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share


<PAGE>


                              BECKLEY BANCORP, INC.

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                  Twelve
                                               Months Ended
                                             December 31, 1996
                                             -----------------

           Net income......................       $275,518
                                                   -------

           Primary and fully diluted average
           shares  outstanding net of 18,482
           unallocated ESOP shares and
           including  1,982 shares
           attributable  to  outstanding
           options determined under
           the treasury stock method.......        584,965
                                                   -------

           Per Share Amount................         $ 0.47
                                                     -----
Exhibit 8.1
-----------
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------


PRIOR TO THE MERGER OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                 JURISDICTION OF             NAME UNDERWHICH
SUBSIDIARIES                      ESTABLISHMENT              BUSINESS IS DONE

Telepisa Celular S.A.                Brazil                        TIM
Teleceara Celular S.A.               Brazil                        TIM
Telern Celular S.A.                  Brazil                        TIM
Telpa Celular S.A.                   Brazil                        TIM
Telpe Celular S.A.                   Brazil                        TIM
Telasa Celular S.A.                  Brazil                        TIM





AFTER ALL REGULATORY APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED AND THE MERGER OF SUBSIDIARIES
IS COMPLETED



                                 JURISDICTION OF             NAME UNDERWHICH
SUBSIDIARIES                      ESTABLISHMENT              BUSINESS IS DONE

TIM Nordeste
Telecomunicacoes S.A.                Brazil                        TIM
# L_2006356EN.01S00201.xml

| 15.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 356/s2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 356/s2

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Jennifer Marie WILSON

No. 28A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed November 3, 2017

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Brenda Menard, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Russell J. Hollers, III and Adam Elkins for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

[COMPASS BANK LOGO]


February l0, 2003


Mr. Richard C. Bailey, COO/CFO
Boyd Brothers Transportation, Inc.
3275 Highway 30
Clayton, AL 36016

Re:      Security and Loan Agreement dated April 11, 2000 between Compass Bank
         and Boyd Brothers Transportation Co., Inc.

Dear Richard:

Section 6.01 in the Loan Agreement dated April 11, 2000 and subsequent
amendments by and between Compass Bank and Boyd Brothers Transportation calls
for a debt service coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0 at the end of December 2002. We
herein waive that covenant requirement for the quarter and year ending December
31, 2002.

Thank you for the good relationship we have with Boyd Brothers. I will be in
touch with you regarding changes needed in the existing covenants.

Sincerely,



/s/ Steven M. McCarroll
-------------------------------------
Steven M. McCarroll
City President
# Official Journal C 309/15 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 309 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4715 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 309

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4715 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 309/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 309/2 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 2 |
| 2004/C 309/3 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 309/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 309/2

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2

2004/C 309/3

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

3

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 309/4 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ | 9 |
| 2004/C 309/5 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ | 13 |
| 2004/C 309/6 | Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Thematic priority area: ‘Specific activities covering a wider field of research’ — Call identifiers: FP6-2004-SME-COOP, FP6-2004-SME-COLL | 16 |
| 2004/C 309/7 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ — Scheme: Communication network development — Call identifier: FP6-2004-Infrastructures-6 | 21 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 309/4

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’

9

2004/C 309/5

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’

13

2004/C 309/6

Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Thematic priority area: ‘Specific activities covering a wider field of research’ — Call identifiers: FP6-2004-SME-COOP, FP6-2004-SME-COLL

16

2004/C 309/7

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ — Scheme: Communication network development — Call identifier: FP6-2004-Infrastructures-6

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUIS RODRIGUEZ-MOLINA,

Appellant,

v.

RAE E. CHOROWSKI, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF 

TERRY ELLEN FIXEL, AUGUST LAROCCO, FIXEL & LAROCCO,

and LORI WRIGHT,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-1939

[July 2, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Sandra Perlman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 16-001965

(04).

Henry E. Marinello of the Law Office of Henry Marinello, P.A., Miami, 

and Christopher W. Royer of Krupnick Campbell Malone Buser Slama 

Hancock, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Dena B. Sacharow and Karene Tygenhof of Keller Landsberg P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
VECELLIO & GROGAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant.

No. COA16-670

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

AFFIRMED. REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

          - [CMS-1307-CN] 
          - RIN 0938-ZA74 

# AGENCY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 

# ACTION:

Correction notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the general notice with comment period published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 23, 2005 entitled “Medicare Program; Criteria and Standards for Evaluating Intermediary, Carrier, and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) Regional Carrier Performance During Fiscal Year 2006.”                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

This correction is effective October 1, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Johnson, (410) 786-5633. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Background 

In FR Doc. 05-18923 of September 23, 2005 (70 FR 55887), there were technical errors that are identified and corrected in the Correction of Errors section below. 

## II. Correction of Errors 

In FR Doc. 05-18923 of September 23, 2005 (70 FR 55887), make the following corrections: 

1. On page 55887, in the third column, second paragraph, lines 2 and 3, the date “October 24, 2005” is corrected to read “October 1, 2005.” 

                    2. On page 55888, in the first column, first paragraph, lines 2 through 4, the phrase “beginning on the first day of the first month following publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    ” is corrected to read, “October 31, 2005'.                 

                    3. On page 55888, in the first column, fourth paragraph, lines 5 and 6, the Web site address “or to                     *http://www.regulations.gov*                    ” is deleted.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) 

Dated: September 26, 2005. 

Jacquelyn Y. White, 

Director, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05-19611 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P