alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ex rel. Gabriel D. LOGAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2174.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Logan, Gabriel, D.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 193,259; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36,-042 KA.

Denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4394 

To prohibit the awarding of contracts to contractors responsible for delayed 

openings of Veterans Affairs facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the awarding of contracts to contractors 

responsible for delayed openings of Veterans Affairs facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Serve Our Heroes Now 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AWARDING CONTRACTS TO 

7 THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELAYED OPEN8 INGS OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FACILITIES. 

9 No contract may be awarded to any contractor if the 

10 past performance of the contractor resulted in the complemstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4394 IH

1 tion of a construction project at a facility of the Depart2 ment of Veterans Affairs more than 24 months after the 

3 original agreed-upon completion date for the project. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Previously announced date & Time:

Thursday, September 29, 2005, 10 a.m. meeting open to the public. This meeting was cancelled.

# Date & Time:

Thursday, October 6, 2005 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

                        (                        **Note**                        : The starting time for the open meeting on Thursday October 6, 2005 has been changed to 2 p.m.)                    

# Date & Time:

Thursday, October 6, 2005, at 2 p.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor)

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

                        Report of the Audit Division on the Dole North Carolina Victory Committee, Inc.                              ( print page 57294)    

Routine Administrative Matters.

# Person to Contact for Information:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-19763 Filed 9-28-05; 3:08 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2955113-MAY-201108:28 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, GEORGE
J. ALBURGER, JR., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify in connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, that based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
---------------------------
George J. Alburger, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 11, 2005
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000899

01-MAR-2016

08:16 AM
STATE of North Carolina v. Freddy VAN

No. COA17-923

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 17, 2018

REMANDED.
Exhibit 4.1

 

 

 

RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
 STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN

 

This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) to the Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. Amended and Restated Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (“Plan”) is adopted by the Board of Directors of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., a California corporation (the “Company”), to be effective as of May 15, 2013, subject to receiving the approval of the shareholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for May 15, 2013.

1.         Purpose.  The purpose of this Amendment is to amend the Plan which was adopted by the Board of Directors in February 2006 and subsequently was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 17, 2006.  All terms in this Amendment shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Plan unless otherwise specifically defined.

2.         Authority to Amend.  Under Section 12 of the Plan, the Board has express authority to amend the Plan from time to time, subject to shareholder approval if the amendment would: (i) materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants; (ii) increase the number of shares deliverable under the Plan (other than in accordance with the provisions of Section 12a of the Plan; or (iii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan or if applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any national securities exchange on which the Company’s securities are listed or NASDAQ so require.  The rules of the New York Stock Exchange require shareholder approval of equity compensation plans such as the Plan and material revisions thereto, including a material extension of the term of the plan.  This Amendment is intended to extend the term of the Plan and, accordingly, the Board of Directors shall obtain shareholder approval for this Amendment.

3.         Amendment to Extend the Duration of the Plan.  Section 12h of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“h. Duration of the Plan.  Unless previously terminated by the Board, the Plan shall terminate at the close of business on December 31, 2018, and no Option or Restricted Stock shall be granted under it thereafter, but such termination shall not affect any Option or Restricted Stock theretofore granted.”

 

* * *
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald J. Powers, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 893]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered June 21, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

After pleading guilty, defendant waived his right to appeal and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of IV2 to 3 years. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his as*648signment on the ground that no nonfrivolous issue can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we disagree. Given defendant’s request at sentencing to amend his plea to an *Alford*plea and his protestation of innocence while addressing County Court, we find that the record reveals potential issues that defendant should be permitted to argue on appeal. Accordingly, defense counsel’s application to be relieved is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues that the record may disclose *(see, People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, *lv denied*67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
#### Arties L. MANNING, Jr., et al. v. UNITED MEDICAL CORPORATION OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.

No. 2003-CC-2246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 11, 2003.

In re Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund Oversight Bd.; — -Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, Nos. 96-16134, 00-10277; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-1237.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., would grant the writ.

VICTORY, J., would grant the writ.

TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4514 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4514

 To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' Benefits Improvements 
 Act of 2012 to change the retroactive application of the Act to cover 
  injuries sustained by rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or 
           after December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2014

  Mr. Marino introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' Benefits Improvements 
 Act of 2012 to change the retroactive application of the Act to cover 
  injuries sustained by rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or 
           after December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kline DeWire Public Safety Officers' 
Retroactive Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR DALE LONG PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS' BENEFITS IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 2012.

    Subsection (d)(2)(A) of the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' 
Benefits Improvements Act of 2012 (section 1086 of Public Law 112-239; 
126 Stat. 1969; 42 U.S.C. 3791 note) is amended by striking ``June 1, 
2009'' and inserting ``December 1, 2007''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4508 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4508

 To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension 
Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior to extend the contract for 
                        certain water services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2014

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension 
Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior to extend the contract for 
                        certain water services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EAST BENCH IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT EXTENSION.

    Section 2(1) of the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract 
Extension Act (Public Law 112-139; 126 Stat. 390) is amended by 
striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``10 years''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF VERA GAZAK,

DECEASED

PETITION OF: F. RICHARD GAZAK :

:

:

:

: No. 517 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Shane MASTERSON, Appellant Pro Se, v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

No. WD 61977.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 5, 2003.

Shane Masterson, Cabool, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrew W. Hassell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

*569Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Shane Masterson appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole on his petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
In the MATTERS OF: A.S., A.S.

No. COA17-1100

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 3, 2018

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED. REMANDED IN PART.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ YELLOW CAB COMPANY O F ORLANDO, INC. , Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

v. CELEBRATION TRANSPOR TATION, INC. ( doing business as C elebration T axi AND T he Y ellow C ab C ompany ), Defendant

- Appellant

.

__________________________ 201 3- 1268

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in N o. 12

- CV

- 1910, Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich

.

__________________________ Before L OURIE , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R
The court considers whether this recently docketed appeal should be transferred to the United States District Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

. Celebration Transportation, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida , in a case involving charges of trademark infringement and Florida state law claims

. Case: 13-1268 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 05/01/2013YELLOW CAB COMPANY v. CELEBRATION TRANSPOR T ATION 2 This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not appear to inc lude jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295

. Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The parties are directed to respond within 14 days from the date of filing of this order concerning whether this appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. (2) The briefing sc hedule is stayed.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 26 Case: 13-1268 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 05/01/2013
State of North Carolina v. William M. Huggins

No. 459P00-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. William M. Huggins, Pro Se.

Ms. Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Ms. Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st of October 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following *518order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Iredell County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
State of North Carolina v. Henry Ford Adkins

No. 19P15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Henry Ford Adkins, for Adkins, Henry Ford.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of October 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel P. OBrien, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DANIEL P. OBRIEN                            
|Daniel P. OBrien                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|December 10, 2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04-18-00021-CV

In the Interest of L.T. ET AL, Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA01683

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to 

this appeal because appellant qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

It is so ORDERED on March 14, 2018.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of March, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
In the MATTER OF: E.D.

No. 125PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2018

Mr. Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for E.D.

Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Mr. Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of April 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of June 2018."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
IN RE: Maud Edwin Elliot INGRAM

431P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Maud Edwin Elliot Ingram, For Ingram, Maud Edwin Elliot.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of February 2018 by Petitioner for Objection to Order:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STEAGALD et al. v. EASON et al.

A15A0857.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

December 1, 2017

Marc Alan Avidano, McDonough, and Andrew James Gebhardt for Appellant.

Walter B. McClelland and James William Scarbrough, Atlanta, for Appellee.

*752MCFADDEN, Presiding Judge.

In *Steagald v. Eason*, 300 Ga. 717, 797 S.E.2d 838 (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision in *Steagald v. Eason*, 334 Ga. App. 113, 778 S.E.2d 366 (2015), affirming the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in this dog-bite case. Accordingly, we vacate our opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

*Judgment reversed.*

Dillard, C.J., and Ellington, P.J., concur.
# Official Journal C 150/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6428 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6428 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 150/01 | Euro exchange rates — 27 April 2021 | 1 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2021/C 150/02 | Summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the negotiating mandate to conclude ten agreements allowing the exchange of data between Eurojust and the competent authorities for judicial cooperation in criminal matters in certain third countries
  (The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS websitewww.edps.europa.eu) | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 150/03 | Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) | 5 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 150/01

Euro exchange rates — 27 April 2021

1

European Data Protection Supervisor

2021/C 150/02

Summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the negotiating mandate to conclude ten agreements allowing the exchange of data between Eurojust and the competent authorities for judicial cooperation in criminal matters in certain third countries
  (The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS websitewww.edps.europa.eu)

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS websitewww.edps.europa.eu)

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 150/03

Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Union Intellectual Property Office |
| 2021/C 150/04 | Call for proposals – GR/002/21 – Support for awareness raising activities about the value of Intellectual Property and the damage caused by counterfeiting and piracy | 7 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Union Intellectual Property Office

2021/C 150/04

Call for proposals – GR/002/21 – Support for awareness raising activities about the value of Intellectual Property and the damage caused by counterfeiting and piracy

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN