alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4401 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the immediate 

designation of substitute representative payees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2014 

Mr. SCHRADER (for himself and Ms. BONAMICI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the immediate designation of substitute representative 

payees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Tem5 porary Emergency Payee Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUBSTITUTE REPRESENTATIVE PAYEES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(j)(1) of the Social Se8 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 405(j)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking the second 

10 sentence; and 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4401 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(C) If the Commissioner of Social Security or a 

3 court of competent jurisdiction determines that the rep4 resentative payee for an individual has died, has misused 

5 any individual’s benefit paid to such representative payee 

6 pursuant to this subsection or section 807 or 1631(a)(2), 

7 or has otherwise become unable or unwilling to continue 

8 serving as a representative payee, the Commissioner of So9 cial Security shall— 

10 ‘‘(i) immediately revoke certification for pay11 ment of the individual’s benefits to such representa12 tive payee; and 

13 ‘‘(ii)(I) notwithstanding paragraph (2), as of 

14 the date of the revocation required under clause (i), 

15 certify payment of such benefits, on a permanent or 

16 temporary basis, to a qualified organization (as de17 fined in paragraph (4)(B)) to serve as a substitute 

18 representative payee for the individual; or 

19 ‘‘(II) if the interest of the individual under this 

20 title would be served thereby, certify payment of 

21 such benefits to the individual.’’. 

22 (b) NO DEFERRAL OF BENEFIT PAYMENT DURING

23 SELECTION OF SUBSTITUTE PAYEE.—Section 

24 205(j)(2)(D) of such Act (42 U.S.C. (j)(2)(D)) is amend25 ed— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4401 IH

1 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘clause (ii)’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘clauses (ii) and (iii)’’; 

3 (2) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); 

4 and 

5 (3) by inserting after clause (ii) the following: 

6 ‘‘(iii) This subparagraph shall not apply with respect 

7 to the selection of a representative payee for an individual 

8 in any case in which a representative payee has previously 

9 been designated for such individual.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




ANSWERS
CORPORATION




FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I am the Chief
Executive Officer of Answers Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).




Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.










Date: May 5,
      2010/s/ Robert S.
      RosenscheinRobert S.
      RosenscheinChief
      Executive Officer
# C_2009044EN.01004402.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/44

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — Torres v OHIM — Gala-Salvador Dali (TG Torre Galatea)

(Case T-8/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark TG Torre Galatea - Earlier Community word mark TORRES 10 - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion)

(2009/C 44/76)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedés, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M. Baz de San Ceferino and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Fundación Gala-Salvador Dali (Figueras, Spain) (represented by: A. Seguera Roda and M. Teixdor Jufresa, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 October 2006 (Case R-168/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres, SA and Fundacion Gala-Salvador Dali.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Miguel Torres, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Miguel Torres, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 4.3.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cree, Inc. and Nanocrystal Lighting Corporation 
Under ATP Award No. 70NANB4H3037

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 12, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cree, Inc. and Nanocrystal 
Lighting Corporation under ATP Award No. 70NANB4H3037 (``Joint 
Venture'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Cree, Inc., Durham, NC; and Nanocrystal Lighting 
Corporation, Briarcliff Manor, NY. The general area of the Joint 
Venture's planned activity is to cooperate in performing research in 
the field of high efficiency solid state lighting. The research will be 
partially funded by an award from the Advanced Technology Program, 
National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1968 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Stephen R. Kerrigan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of Coinmach Service Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
 

 
  audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 4, 2006 /s/ Stephen R. Kerrigan Stephen R. Kerrigan    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Robert M. Doyle, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which the statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 7, 2007    /s/ Robert M. Doyle Robert M. Doyle
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 28, 2017

No. 04-17-00640-CR

William Boyd PORTER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4455

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record is due on December 29, 2017. On December 22, 2017, the court 

reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed a notification of late 

record, stating that although appellant’s counsel contacted her on November 14, 2017, and stated 

he would make a deposit of partial fees, counsel has wholly failed to pay any fees. 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within 

thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin R. Callahan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: August 8, 2008



/s/ Kevin R. CallahanKevin R. CallahanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,954,199
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       509,515
<ALLOWANCES>                        (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                         200,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,758,436
<PP&E>                            1,091,008
<DEPRECIATION>                     (841,348)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,987,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,468,794
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         13,726,491
<OTHER-SE>                      (11,208,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,987,004
<SALES>                           6,356,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  6,356,136
<CGS>                               772,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       772,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  6,110,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (71,645)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (455,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (455,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (455,612)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.07)



</TABLE>
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 43 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, 

Minnesota, as the ‘‘Officer Tommy Decker Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 43 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. OFFICER TOMMY DECKER MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 14 Red River Avenue North in 

5 Cold Spring, Minnesota, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Tommy Deck11 er Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathan Wayne BROYHILL

No. 284P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Mr. M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Broyhill, Jonathan Wayne

Mr. Robert C. Montgomery, Raleigh, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Ms. Mary Carla Babb, Raleigh, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of August 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Daryl WILLIAMS

No. 171A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Gilda C. Rodriguez, Attorney at Law, for Williams, Daryl.

Scott Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 1st of June 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 20th of June 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
EXHIBIT 32



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  iDcentrix, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter October 31, 2009,

I, Joseph Meuse, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 21, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 21, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:

December 21, 2009

By:  /s/ Joseph J. Meuse



Joseph J. Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)