alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James D.
Floyd, Interim Principal Financial Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James D. Floyd
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | James D. Floyd                     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Interim Principal Financial Officer
#### Morris Israel, Appellant, *v.*Goldie Krupa, Defendant, and Robert Krupa, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 28, 1943.

*996
      *Solomon C. Stember*and *Samuel C. Cantor*for appellant.

*Morris J. Norwick*for respondent.

Memorandum *Per Curiam.*

Where a guest in plaintiff’s automobile sues plaintiff and defendants for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles driven by plaintiff and defendant-respondent, the judgment obtained in her favor against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor may not be set up against plaintiff as *res judicata*in a subsequent action by plaintiff against defendant-respondent for property damage. *(Self*v. *International Ry. Co.,*224 App. Div. 238.) The defendant not having appealed from the dismissal of his counterclaim he may not have a second trial. *(Ginsberg*v. *City of Long Beach,*286 K Y. 400, 403.)

Judgment and order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.





I, Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu, Chief Executive Officer of TIM Participações S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TIM Participações S.A.





Date: April 26, 2013


By:
/s/ Rodrigo Modesto de AbreuName:
Rodrigo Modesto de AbreuTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
#### Nathan CASEY v. STATE.

CR-98-1661.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 30, 2002.

Nathan Casey, pro se.

William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Yvonne A.H. Saxon, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

*After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court*

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in *Ex parte Casey,*852 So.2d 175 (Ala.2002), this cause is due to be remanded to the trial court with instructions to resentence the appellant in accordance with that opinion. A return to remand shall be made to this Court within 63 days of the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. 

COBB, BASCHAB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135700 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL RAY MULLINS and SUZANNE Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, EVA MULLINS, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 135700 

 COA: 275340 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000319-NI 

MATTHEW STANFORD and MARK DOYLE, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Netlist, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (“Netlist”) for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 (the “Report”),Chun K. Hong, president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board ofNetlist, and Gail M. Sasaki, vice president and chief financial officer ofNetlist, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to his or her knowledge:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Netlist, Inc.

 
| May 17,  2010 | /s/  Chun K. Hong                                             |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Chun  K. Hong                                                 |
|               | President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|               | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                |
|               |                                                          |
|               |                                                          |
| May 17,  2010 | /s/  Gail M. Sasaki                                           |
|               | Gail  M. Sasaki                                               |
|               | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer                   |
|               | (Principal  Financial Officer)                                |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Charles A. Casalinova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                           /s/ Charles A. Casalinova
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles A. Casalinova
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 13, 2005







The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

l!onorabYe

PonaYd M. XnrkIe, Chairman Comzzittee

on Conetitlttional' Amendments

**~:OUWJ** of Rcprcuentatioos 4RthLt?gi!slature An&in, Texafi Opinion #a. 0-6627

Ccneral Opinion_Nos. Mny 30, 1046, red dircunstances surrounding y the Loglslaturo and of State’s OPCice to counties of the statej order to fully 0xpYore is prOQOUea amendment it ry for you t.ntnke into nacount any releyour direot i~nvesti.gatlon of the exiutceu may reveal,. Thi.a in my understanding
s In thiu.

ease:

*I am inlormed by the office of the Secretary of Stat.0 that He J. n. 13 was mailed to 238 newspapars on Tuefiday

evcninp, Yav 22, P04!5;the 

### sam asy it wan re

### c~ef~cd in **thnt off-lco.**  Xo noxsnnpx- ia **publi~heti** In therclrai.nlng

16 counties. The acLnovlcd,~ant cards, ncce~tin.~

t,l?o COnY for **rnh7icntion on**  the dotos specj~- ficti, was roturned hwdiatoly **hy 2** **’ 24**  publishers. Of the 14 who wrote to say the ?npymissed their dondline,**3,014 Fr1aay**  480 Est. S,QEK) lkxlnesday 1,3&3 **FrCioy** 2,607 Thursday 1)nm Friday MXJ 33st

.Thtwuaay **r,n3r, Thursday** 
12,032 3,329 I,m33 12,451 41,o23 rr,rrr?4 12,372 10,0&l R*3Sr,legn33y sub?dttcd for a vote on August **25, 10451** 
"(2) Irrospeotive of your anmer to question P;umher**1, will**  **the aiiandmont**  **?3ecosra a**  **part** of the onnstitution should It eppar on tho hsllot and moeive a nzajorltyof the VoteR cast?"

**You are**  **advIsed that**  uixler **the facts**  **etated House**  **Joint Rep#lut.lon**  **Ho. X3**  **is Mint:**  **Xegally nOmItt&**  **with this**  **~ImlIfication,** in **go@@ of**  **the** OOuntias **‘ We**  **save has**  **not hoen**  **hly puhl1~hed**  **fop uant**  **nP** sdfieient time. Tb3s IrroguJzrity~111not necessarily prevent I:!:e sdoption OF the amencJmcnt hy thepeopleunless the total potcntid leg-al vote In those cmmtlos where no publicntlon was had nnd **no** eJeot.ion @clcJ **WOtsld he**  **suff3clont if**  **counter1** ap$inst the a&?tion of **the mencl**  mnti to result in the amendment's **receiving** less tfinn a =alorityof fiueJl

total count. In such event the amendment would ret1for lack of+the neoessnry majority vote. **SOS the**  **Pol.1 oa**  **snf? cascm** 
**IhmnlCut to**  State, 12 6. i?.106;

I:etxwt v. Scurloc!~,

17,"i;. V. 711; Uanos v. State, 203 S. E. 310.

We trust thc~t

what we hffvo&id suffiolontJyanswers blthofyour questioas.
In the MATTER OF: K.W.

No. COA17-735

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

REVERSED. REMANDED.
# Official Journal L 76/22 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 76 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4822 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 76

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4822 March 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 24 January 2005 on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol setting out, for the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2007, the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire on fishing off the coast of Côte d'Ivoire | 1 |
| Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters concerning the provisional application of the protocol setting out, for the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2007, the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire on fishing off the coast of Côte d'Ivoire | 3 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 24 January 2005 on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol setting out, for the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2007, the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire on fishing off the coast of Côte d'Ivoire

1

Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters concerning the provisional application of the protocol setting out, for the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2007, the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire on fishing off the coast of Côte d'Ivoire

3

| | | Acts adopted pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties | 16 |

Acts adopted pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union

*

Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties

16

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6282

WILLIAM LEBRON ANDREW CHURCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U.S. GOVERNMENT; SECRETARY OF DEFENSE; U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL;

ROBERT S. MUELLER, Director; SECRETARY, VETERANS AFFAIRS;

WILLIAM J. DANIELS, (Bill), Recruiter; GENERAL COUNSEL AND

STAFF; MICHAEL L. ALSTON, Director, U.S. Department of Justice;

JOHN K. SINGLAUB; DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

R. C. NIXON, Ms.; TERRY GLENN, Mr.; DIRECTOR, CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA

PAROLE BOARD; C.A. COLLINS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

OMBUDSMAN; JUNE KIM BRIEL, Inspector General, Virginia

Department of Corrections; VIRGINIA SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY;

THOMAS W. WARREN, Judge, Circuit Court of Amelia County,

Virginia; THOMAS STARK, Commonwealth Attorney; LEE R. HARRISON,

Commonwealth Attorney; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; ASSISTANT

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; DONALD FORD, Jr., Esquire; GRAHAM

T. JENNINGS, Esquire; HUDSON, Mr., Esquire; CURTIS G. HUDSON,

Esquire; WILLIAM NEWSOME, Esquire; R. CLINTON CLARY, Jr.,

Esquire; CHIEF JUDGE, Court of Appeals of Virginia; CHIEF JUDGE,

Supreme Court of Virginia; RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, U.S. District

Court, Eastern District of Virginia; KAREN J. WILLIAMS, Circuit

Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; DOES UNKNOWN,

Unidentified,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:07-cv-00129-HEH)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 19, 2008

Certiorari dismissed, March 9, 2009
2

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lebron Andrew Church, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

William Lebron Andrew Church appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Church v. U.S. Gov’t, No. 3:07-cv-00129-HEH

(E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2008). We deny Church’s motions to appoint

counsel and for other relief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 43

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, as the 
             ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

 Mrs. Bachmann (for herself, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Kline, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
    Nolan, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Peterson, and Mr. Walz) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, as the 
             ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER TOMMY DECKER MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE: Maud Edwin Elliot INGRAM

431P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Maud Edwin Elliot Ingram, For Ingram, Maud Edwin Elliot.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of February 2018 by Petitioner for Trial by Jury:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
#### Albert DYON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D02-1494, 4D02-4012.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence entered pursuant to its order revoking appellant’s probation. However, the written order revoking probation does not appear to conform to the trial court’s oral findings that Dyon was in violation of his probation as alleged in paragraphs 2-4 of the affidavit of probation violation. Accordingly, we remand with instructions to *397enter an amended revocation order correcting this apparent clerical error.

STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 432/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 432 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5822 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 432

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5822 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 432/1 | Position (EU) No 16/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marksAdopted by the Council on 10 November 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 432/2 | Statement of Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 16/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks | 27 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 432/1

Position (EU) No 16/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marksAdopted by the Council on 10 November 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 432/2

Statement of Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 16/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks

27

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rocky Lee Ellinger, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00205

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 276th District Court of Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F14503 ). Opinion delivered by C hief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modi fy the trial court’s judgment by deleting the assessment of attorney fees incurred during the revocation proceeding from the judgment, leaving only the $300.00 in attorney fees that were assessed as part of appellant ’ s original plea

agreement

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Rocky Lee Ellinger, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 21, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk