alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 382/28 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 382 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4728 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 382

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4728 December 2004

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | 2004/798/EC:Commission Decision of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region (notified under document number C(2004) 4031) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

2004/798/EC:Commission Decision of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region (notified under document number C(2004) 4031)

(notified under document number C(2004) 4031)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

70 FR 180.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

11 a.m., Monday, October 3, 2005.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The closed meeting to discuss a Derivatives Clearing Organization Review has been canceled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-19822  Filed 9-29-05; 12:29 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6308

PAUL AVON MILLS, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00110-JBF-FBS) 

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Paul Avon Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Karri B. Atwood, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Paul Avon Mills seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Mills has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            531,000
<SECURITIES>                                    6,006,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,118,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (57,000)
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,770,000
<PP&E>                                          4,640,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,502,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,908,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             421,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        4,462,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,549,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,908,000
<SALES>                                         9,638,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,962,000
<CGS>                                           4,644,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,750,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,212,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      472,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      740,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .21
                                                         

</TABLE>
In the MATTER OF: J.L.T. and S.R.J.T.

No. 244P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Lisa Anne Wagner, Attorney at Law, for Hawkins, Amber Nicole.

Anne C. Wright, Attorney at Law, Boone, for Triplett, Steven.

Daniel S. Johnson, Attorney at Law, for Wilkes County DSS.

Amanda Armstrong, Attorney at Law, for GAL.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of July 2017 by Petitioner for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 21st of July 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

*492Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of July 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                               RED ROOF INNS, INC.

                           ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Red Roof Inns,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and
appoints David N. Chichester and/or Alan L. Tallis, collectively and
individually, as his agent and attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and re-substitution, to (a) sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on
his behalf and in his name, place, and stead in any and all capacities with
respect to the registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d), (b) sign and file any and all amendments, including
post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K, (c) sign and file any and
all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission covered by the Form 10-K, and (d) do and perform any and all other
acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required in the premises; and
(2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant hereto
by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 16th day of March, 1998.



                               /s/ THOMAS E. DOBROWSKI
                               -----------------------------
                               Thomas E. Dobrowski



                                       54
# Official Journal C 151I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 151I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 656 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 151I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 656 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 151 I/01 | Communication from the Commission – Guidance to the Member States concerning foreign direct investment from Russia and Belarus in view of the military aggression against Ukraine and the restrictive measures laid down in recent Council Regulations on sanctions | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 151 I/01

Communication from the Commission – Guidance to the Member States concerning foreign direct investment from Russia and Belarus in view of the military aggression against Ukraine and the restrictive measures laid down in recent Council Regulations on sanctions

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Interim Decision #2302 

MATTER OF MANALO 

In Exclusion Proceedings 

A-19257498 

Decided by Board July 3, 1974 

Request for permission to withdraw his application for admission, made following the 

entry of an exclusion order and during the pendency of appeal to the Board, is denied an 

applicant found excludable on the ground he obtained his visa by misrepresenting 

material facts. 

EXCLUDABLE.% Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(19) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(19)J—Procured visa 

by misrepresenting material facts. 

. Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(20) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(20)1—Immigrant alien 

not in possession of immigrant visa. 

ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Dan F. Danilov, Esquire 

3828 Seattle-First National Bank Building 

Seattle, Washington 98154 

During the pendency of this appeal from an exclusion order, applicant's counsel wrote us under date of June 5, 1974 that the applicant 

"has requested departure from the United States on June 5, 1974 and he 

has arranged to pay for the transportation costs out of his own funds." 

Enclosed was a request for dismissal of the appeal "for the reason that 

the applicant wishes to withdraw his Application for Admission into the 

United States and return to the Republic of the Philippines as soon as 

possible." We are informed by the Immigration and Naturalization 

Service that the applicant departed from the United States on June 5, 

1974. 

There is a marked difference between withdrawl of an appeal, which 

under 8 CFR 3.4 leaves the original exclusion order in effect to the same 

extent as if no appeal had been taken, and withdrawal of an application 

for admission. If permission is granted by the immigration judge or this 

Board to withdraw the application for admission, the alien departs 

without being excluded. The alien may not, without leave and as a 

matter of right, withdraw his application for admission, Matter of 

Vargas-Molina, 13 I. & N. Dec. 651 (BIA, 1971). On this record, we see 

no reason to permit withdrawal of the application for admission. 

ORDER: The record is returned to the Service without further action 

by the Board. 

4
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Ray HOLLIDAY

No. COA17-374

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

DISMISSED.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT KNOXVI LLE June 28, 200 5 STATE OF TENNESS EE v . DONALD LUKE SE IB ER, ALIAS
Direc t Appeal from the Cr im inal Cou rt for K nox Coun ty

No. 73049 Ray L. Jenkin s, Jud ge

No. E2004-01794-CC A-R3- CD - F iled October 25, 2005

J A M ES C UR WO OD W I TT , J R ., J ., co n cu rr i n g.

Resp ec tfully , I

find I cannot f ully concur in the opinion because , based upon the absenc e of a

contempora neous objec tion, it t rea ts a s waived the issue of the tria l court’s “ rea ding the ag g ravated kidnapping as a le sser-inc luded offe nse out of order during the char g e to t he jury .” The ins truc tio na l pr ob le m a lle g e d is on e of ins truc tio na l error , no t i ns truc tio na l omission . I n th e c a se of t he former, no contempora neous obj ection is require d, unlike when an instruction is omi tted. See, e.g., Stat e v. Johnny W

ade Me eks , No. 03C01-9811-CR-00411, slip op. at 8-9 (T enn. Crim. App., Knoxvi lle, Dec . 3, 1999).

Even though I see no require ment that appellate revie w of this issue is occluded ba sed upon a lac k of conte m p o ra n eous obj ection, I nevertheless would not reve rse the c onviction of a g g ra va te d kidn app ing

. I n my vie w the arr a ng e me nt of the jury ins truc tio ns , if er ro r, wa s h arm le ss be y on d a re a so na ble do ub t.

___________________________________ J AMES CURW OOD WI TT, J R., J UDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-19638  Filed 9-27-05; 2:50 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6305
MICHAEL G. MICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden, FCI,Morgantown, WV; BRENDA BARRETT, Health Services Administrator; A. BLANCO, Physician's Assistant; M. BLANCO, Physician's Assistant; J. AHAMED, Physician's Assistant; R. WHITENER, Physician's Ass istant; VICTOR SIHA, M.D.; UNNAMED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, P.T.U.; G. L. BOGDEN, Assistant Warden, FCI, Morgantown, WV, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-13-1) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael G. Mick, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mick v. Reno , No. CA-96-13-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SMS STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B

        OFFICERS CERTIFICATE



     In accordance with Section 3(a) of the Administration  Agreement,  dated as
of April 1, 2000,  among SMS Student Loan Trust  2000-B,  a Delaware  trust (the
"Issuer"), USA Group Secondary Market Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as
administrator  (the  "Administrator"),  and Bankers  Trust  Company,  a New York
banking  corporation,  not in its  individual  capacity  but solely as Indenture
Trustee (the "Indenture Trustee"), the undersigned, in their official capacities
as Authorized  Officers,  on behalf of the Administrator,  hereby certify that a
review of the activities of the Administrator during the period from the closing
date to  September  30,  2000 and of its  performance  under the  Administration
Agreement has been made under our supervision, and to the best of our knowledge,
based on such review,  the Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Administration Agreement throughout such period.

     Terms  used  herein  and not  specifically  herein  defined  shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Administration Agreement.

     In witness whereof, the undersigned,  on behalf of the Administrator,  have
signed their names as of September 30, 2000.

USA GROUP SECONDARY MARKET SERVICES, INC.,
Administrator

By: /s/ Stephen W. Clinton
Stephen W. Clinton, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer



By: /s/ Cheryl E. Watson
Cheryl E. Watson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Gottwald               
|    |  | Thomas E. Gottwald                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 2, 2005                     



44
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00611

- CV

David Allan EDWARDS

, Appellant

v.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ATASCOSA COUNTY, TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 02

- 0185

- CVA Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that the parties shall ea ch bear their own costs of appeal.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN RE: HODGE

182A15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2017

Steven Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Adam Jarmal Hodge, for Hodge, Adam Jarmal.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of November 2017 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with the Register of Deeds:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2017."
STATE v. Robert A.D. WALDRUP

189P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Robert A.D. Waldrup, For Waldrup, Robert A.D.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of December 2017 by Defendant for Rehearing En Banc:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE of North Carolina v. Calvin Renard CARTER

No. 193PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed November 3, 2017

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Kristin J. Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Richard J. Costanza for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *481*State v. Brice* , --- N.C. ----, ---S.E.2d ----, 2017 WL 5017127 (Nov. 3, 2017) (No. 244PA16), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.