Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules 57221 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section 

for a location to examine the regulatory 

evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by removing amendment 39–11822 (65 

FR 44672, July 19, 2000) and adding the 

following new airworthiness directive 

(AD): 

McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2005–

22557; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–

147–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) The FAA must receive comments on 

this AD action by November 14, 2005. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD supersedes AD 2000–14–12. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas 

Model MD–11 and MD–11F airplanes, 

certificated in any category, as identified 

McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin 

MD11–25A233, Revision 1, dated May 10, 

2005. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD results from reports of burning 

and smoldering blankets in the forward crew 

rest area due to a reading light fixture that 

came into contact with the blankets after the 

light was inadvertently left on. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent a possible 

flammable condition, which could result in 

smoke and fire in the forward crew rest area. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Restatement of the Requirements of AD 

2000–14–12 

Replacement 

(f) For airplanes identified in McDonnell 

Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11–

25A233, dated June 9, 1999: Within 6 months 

after August 23, 2000 (the effective date of 

AD 2000–14–12), replace the upper and 

lower reading lights in the forward crew rest 

area with a redesigned light fixture, in 

accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert 

Service Bulletin MD11–25A233, dated June 

9, 1999; or Revision 1, dated May 10, 2005. 

After the effective date of this AD, do the 

replacement in accordance with McDonnell 

Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11–

25A233, Revision 1, dated May 10, 2005. 

Note 1: McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 

Bulletin MD11–25A233 refers to AIM 

Aviation Service Incorporated Service 

Bulletin AIM-MD11–25–2, Revision C, dated 

March 8, 1999; and Revision D, dated March 

16, 2005; as additional sources of service 

information for replacing the upper and 

lower reading lights in the forward crew rest 

area. 

New Requirements of This AD 

Replacement 

(g) For all airplanes except those identified 

in paragraph (f) of this AD: Within 6 months 

after the effective date of this AD, do the 

replacement specified in paragraph (f) of this 

AD. 

Parts Installation 

(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install, on any airplane, a reading 

lamp, part number (P/N) 2232, and light 

fixture, P/N 0200500–001. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) 

(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested in accordance with the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any 

airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 

the appropriate principal inspector in the 

FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding 

District Office. 

(3) AMOCs approved previously in 

accordance with AD 2000–14–12, 

amendment 39–11822, are approved as 

AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of 

this AD. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 21, 2005. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–19565 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22403; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–NM–144–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier 

Model DHC–8–400 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM); correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a 

typographical error in an NPRM that 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 14, 2005 (70 FR 54316). 

The error resulted in an incorrect 

Docket No. The NPRM applies to certain 

Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 series 

airplanes. The NPRM would require an 

inspection of the laminated shims for 

cracks, damage, or extrusion between 

the forward attachment fittings of the 

horizontal stabilizer and the top rib of 

the vertical stabilizer; a torque check of 

the attachment bolts in the attachment 

fittings of the front, middle, and rear 

spars; and corrective actions if 

necessary. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George Duckett, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–

171, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone (516) 256–7525; fax 

(516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 6, 2005, the FAA issued a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an 

AD that would apply to certain 

Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 series 

airplanes. That NPRM was published in 

the Federal Register on September 14, 

2005 (70 FR 54316). That NPRM 

proposed to require an inspection of the 

laminated shims for cracks, damage, or 

extrusion between the forward 

attachment fittings of the horizontal 

stabilizer and the top rib of the vertical 

stabilizer; a torque check of the 

attachment bolts in the attachment 

57222 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

fittings of the front, middle, and rear 

spars; and corrective actions if 

necessary. 

As published, that NPRM specifies an 

incorrect Docket No. (i.e., FAA–2005–

20403) throughout preamble and the 

regulatory text of the AD. The correct 

Docket No. is FAA–2005–22403. 

No other part of the regulatory 

information has been changed; 

therefore, the NPRM is not republished 

in the Federal Register. 

The last date for submitting comments 

to the NPRM remains October 14, 2005. 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

In the Federal Register of September 

14, 2005, on page 54318, in the first 

column, paragraph 2. of PART 39—

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of 

NPRM, Docket No. FAA–2005–22403, 

Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–144–AD 

is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, 

Inc.): Docket No. FAA–2005–22403; 

Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–144–AD. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 26, 2005. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–19558 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22402; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–NM–133–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Sabreliner 

Model NA–265, NA–265–20, NA–265–

30, NA–265–40, NA–265–50, NA–265–

60, NA–265–65, NA–265–70, and NA–

265–80 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM); correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a 

typographical error in an NPRM that 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 14, 2005 (70 FR 54318). 

The error resulted in an incorrect 

Docket No. The NPRM applies to certain 

Sabreliner Model NA–265, NA–265–20, 

NA–265–30, NA–265–40, NA–265–50, 

NA–265–60, NA–265–65, NA–265–70, 

and NA–265–80 series airplanes. The 

NPRM would require repetitive 

inspections for discrepancies in the 

front and rear spars of the wing in the 

area of the wing center section, and in 

the lugs on the rear spar and wing 

trailing edge panel rib, and corrective 

actions if necessary. The NPRM also 

would require inspections for fuel leaks 

of the front and rear spars of the wing, 

and for discrepancies in the front and 

rear spars of the wing in the area of the 

wing center section, and in the lugs on 

the rear spar and wing trailing edge 

panel rib; and related investigative and 

corrective actions, if necessary. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: T.N. 

Baktha, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 

Branch, ACE–118W, FAA, Wichita 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 

Airport Road, room 100, Mid-Continent 

Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; 

telephone (316) 946–4155; fax (316) 

946–4407. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 6, 2005, the FAA issued a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an 

AD that would apply to certain 

Sabreliner Model NA–265, NA–265–20, 

NA–265–30, NA–265–40, NA–265–50, 

NA–265–60, NA–265–65, NA–265–70, 

and NA–265–80 series airplanes. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on September 14, 2005 (70 FR 

54318). That NPRM proposed to require 

repetitive inspections for discrepancies 

in the front and rear spars of the wing 

in the area of the wing center section, 

and in the lugs on the rear spar and 

wing trailing edge panel rib, and 

corrective actions if necessary. That 

NPRM also proposed to require 

repetitive inspections for fuel leaks of 

the front and rear spars of the wing, and 

for discrepancies in the front and rear 

spars of the wing in the area of the wing 

center section, and in the lugs on the 

rear spar and wing trailing edge panel 

rib; and related investigative and 

corrective actions, if necessary. 

As published, that NPRM specifies an 

incorrect Docket No. (i.e., FAA–2005–

20402) throughout preamble and the 

regulatory text of the AD. The correct 

Docket No. is FAA–2005–22402. 

No other part of the regulatory 

information has been changed; 

therefore, the NPRM is not republished 

in the Federal Register. 

The last date for submitting comments 

to the NPRM remains October 31, 2005. 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

In the Federal Register of September 

14, 2005, on page 54320, in the third 

column, paragraph 2. of PART 39—

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of 

NPRM, Docket No. FAA–2005–22402, 

Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–133–AD 

is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

Sabreliner Corporation: Docket No. FAA–

2005–22402; Directorate Identifier 2005–

NM–133–AD. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 26, 2005. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–19557 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

20 CFR Part 411 

RIN 0960–AF89 

Amendments to the Ticket to Work and 

Self-Sufficiency Program 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: We are proposing to revise 

our regulations for the Ticket to Work 

and Self-Sufficiency Program (Ticket to 

Work program), authorized by the 

Ticket to Work and Work Incentives 

Improvement Act of 1999. The Ticket to 

Work program provides beneficiaries 

with disabilities expanded options for 

access to employment services, 

vocational rehabilitation services, and 

other support services. We are 

proposing to make revisions to the 

current rules to improve the overall 

effectiveness of the program in assisting 

beneficiaries to maximize their 

economic self-sufficiency through work 

opportunities. These revisions are based 

on our vision of the future direction of 

the Ticket to Work program, our 

experience using the current rules, and 

recommendations made by a number of 

commenters on the program. 

DATES: To be sure your comments are 

considered, we must receive them by 

December 29, 2005. 

ADDRESSEES: You may give us your 

comments by: using our Internet site 

facility (i.e., Social Security Online) at 

http://policy.ssa.gov/erm/ 

Rules+Open+To+Comment or the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov; e-mail to 

regulations@ssa.gov; by telefax to (410) 

966–2830; or letter to the Commissioner 

of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703, 

Baltimore, MD 21235–7703. You may 

also deliver them to the Office of 

Regulations, Social Security 

Administration, 107 Altmeyer Building, 

6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 

21235–6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30