Interim Decision #1297. 

MATTER or Woo 

In DEPORTATION Proceedings 

A-11822728 

Decided by Board August 13,1963 

While an applicant for suspension of deportation who is exempt from the requirement of any specified period of continuous physical presence as provided by 

section 244(b), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, is also exempt 

from the necessity of establishing good moral character for the period coextensive with the physical-presence period, he must establish good moral. 

character between the date he filed his suspension application and the date 

it is finally adjudicated. Conduct prior to the filing date can be considered 

in determining whether good moral character has been established during -

the period in question. 

CHARGE : 

Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (1) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (1) ]—Excludable 

at entry under section 212(a) (20)—No immigrant visa. 

The special inquiry officer on June 18, 1963 entered an order granting the respondent's request that his deportation be suspended under 

the provisions of section 244 (a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and directed that the case be certified to this Board for final 

d.eoision in accordance with the applicable regulations. The respondent, a 28-year-old married male, native and citizen of China, was 

first admitted to the United States at San Francisco, California on 

March 24, 1948 under the name of Louie Chung Ring as the United 

States citizen son of Louie Sheuck Yu, a native-born citizen of the 

United States. The respondent last entered the United States at 

Travis Air Force Base on or about May 16, 1960 as a member of the 

United States Armed Forces. Deportation proceedings were instituted. 

against the respondent on February 14, 1962. 

Hearings in deportation proceedings were held at Seattle, Washington on March 6 and March 20, 1902, at which time the respondent 

and counsel admitted the truth of the factual allegations set forth in 

the order to show cause and conceded deportability on the charge stated 

therein. The respondent was not a citizen of the United -States on the 

347 
Interim Decision #1297 

occasion of his initial admission at San Francisco, California in March 

1948 or when he last entered the United. States as a member of the 

armed forces in May 1960. The decision of the special inquiry officer 

directing that the respondent be deported from the United States to 

Hong Kong or in the alternative to Formosa became final when no 

appeal was taken therefrom. The evidence of record clearly establishes that the respondent is subject to deportation under the provisions 

of section 241( a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, in 

that, at the time of entry he was within one or more of the classes of 

aliens excludable by the law existing at the time of such entry, to wit, 

aliens who are immigrants not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other valid entry 

document and not exempted from the possession thereof by said Act 

or regulations made thereunder, under section 212 ( a) (20) of the Bruntgration and Nationality Act. 

The respondent's motion requesting that the proceedings be reopened 

for the purpose of affording him an opportunity to prosecute an application for suspension of deportation under the provisions of section 

244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as amended by the Act of 

October 24, 1962 was granted by the special inquiry officer on January 

25, 1963. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the special inquiry 

officer's decision of June 18, 1963 granting the respondent's application 

for suspension of deportation under section 244 of the Immigration 

and Nationality Act, as amended, will be approved. The evidence 

adduced at the reopened hearing held at Seattle, Washington on February 1, 1963 establishes that the respondent was born in Hong Kong, 

British Crown Colony, on June 6, 1935; that ho attended primary 

school in Hong Kong until he was 12 years of age, at which time 

arrangements were made by his father, then a. resident of the United 

States, to have the respondent enter the United States as the son of 

one Louie Sheuck Yu, a native-born citizen of the United States. The 

respondent's testimony indicates that after his admission. to the United 

States he retained his assumed identity of Louie Chung Hing; that 

he completed high school in the United States and joined the Washington State National Guard in 1956. 

The respondent enlisted in the Regular Army of the United States 

on September 7, 1957. He served continuously therein until his honorable discharge therefrom on May 16, 1960, a period of two years and 

eight months, at which time he was transferred to the United States 

Reserve Corps. While a member of the armed forces of the United 

States stationed in Guam, the respondent secured leave and went to 

Hong Kong, British Crown Colony, where he was married on Jannary 30, 1959 to one Tso Lai Jen, a native and citizen of China. (Ex. 

7) A son, now two years of age, was born of this union in Hong 

348 
Interim Decision #1297 

Kong, British Crown Colony. The respondent's petition for the issuance of a nonquota immigrant visa, to his wife subscribed and sworn 

to before a United States Consular Officer at Hong Kong, British 

Crown Colony, on February 6, 1959 failed to receive favorable consideration because the respondent was unable to submit any evidence in 

support of his claim that he was a United States citizen and he refused 

to submit to blood grouping tests. The respondent when questioned 

under oath by an officer of the Service at the office of the American 

Consulate in Hong Kong, British Crown Colony, on June 29, 1959 

reiterated his false claim of being a citizen of the United States and 

deposed that his father was Louie Sheuck Yu, a native-born citizen 

of this country. 

The respondent's application requesting that his deportation be suspended under sections 244(a) (1) and 211(b) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act was subscribed, sworn to and submitted for consideration at the Seattle, Washington office of the Service on February 1, 

1963. Section 241(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as 

amended by the Act of October 24, 1962 provides that the requirements 

of continuous physical presence in the United States specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) shall not be applicable -to an alien 

who has served for a minimum period of 24 months in an active duty 

status in the armed forces of the United States and, if separated from 

such service, was separated under honorable conditions. As previously noted, the respondent served honorably in the United States 

Armed Forces on an active duty status for a continuous period of two 

years and eight months. This Board held in Matter of P—, 

A-11402870, decided June 10, 1063, that an applicant who is exempt 

from the requirements of any specified period of continuous physical 

presence as provided in section 244 (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is also exempt from the necessity of establishing good moral 

character for the period coextensive with the physical presence period; 

that the alien in such case must establish good moral character between 

the date of the filing of his application for suspension of deportation 

and the date that it is finally adjudicated and the alien's conduct prior 

to the date of filing can be considered in determining whether good 

moral character has been established during the period in question. 

The only manner in which the respondent's immigrant status can 

be adjusted is by suspension of deportation. He is ineligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act because the quota for Chinese persons is pre-empted in all 

categories for an indefinite period and he cannot qualify for the 

creation of a lawful record of admission under section 249 of the Act. 

The record reflects the respondent has never been affiliated with any 

subversive or proscribed organizations. Except for traffic arrests, the 

349 
interim Decision #1297 

:respondent has no criminal record in the United States or elsewhere. 

independent character investigations conducted by the Service are 

.entirely favorable to the respondent's application for the discretionary 

.relief of suspension of deportation. He has maintained an excellent 

-employment record and his present employer describes him as a conscientious person of good character and reputation, without objectionable traits or bad habits. The respondent's fraudulent admission 

to the United. States in March 1948 as a citizen thereof and his retention 

of the assumed identity under which he was admitted to the United 

States in 1948 as well as his continuing to claim to be a citizen of the 

United States until sometime after his discharge from the United 

States Armed Forces in May 1960 are acts which should not be charged 

against the respondent inasmuch as he was only a child 12 years of 

age when his natural father , then a resident of the United States, 

arranged to have him admitted to the United States as the citizen son 

of Louie Sheuck Yu, a United States citizen. 

The respondent has been a resident of the United States sines he was 

12 years old, a period of more than 15 years. His military record in 

the United States Army is excellent. Moreover, he speaks good English and enjoys a good reputation among associates and employers. 

Persons who have known the respondent for many years attest that 

he is a person of good moral character and loyal to the United States. 

Clearly, his deportation from the United States would result in extreme hardship to himself. On the basis of all the evidence in this 

record, we find that the respondent has established good moral character and is statutorily eligible for the discretionary relief of suspension of deportation under section 244(a) (1). For the reasons hereinbefore set forth, no change will be made in the order of the special 

inquiry officer granting suspension of deportation. 

ORDER: It is ordered that the deportation of the alien be suspended under the provisions of section 244(a) (1) of the Immigration 

and Nationality Act.. 

It is fv.rther ordered that if the Congress takes no action adverse 

to the order granting suspension of deportation, the proceedings be 

cancelled, and the alien, if a quota immigrant at the time of entry not 

then charged to the appropriate quota, be so charged as provided by 

law. 

It is further ordered that in the event Congress takes action adverse 

to the order granting suspension of deportation, these proceedings 

shall be reopened upon notice to the alien. 

350