alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.28
  
 
       Very truly yours,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION/s/ James R. BednarkJames R. BednarkSenior Vice President




---



##### 



CONSENT
   LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.
    
    
    
    DANNER, INC./s/ Joseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    /s/ Joseph P. SchneiderJoseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    Joseph P. SchneiderPresident/Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    President/Chief Executive Officer/s/ David Carlson
    
    
    
    /s/ David CarlsonDavid Carlson
    
    
    
    David CarlsonExecutive Vice President, Chief
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary
    
    
    
    Financial Officer and Secretary
EX-10.90



 Exhibit 10.90 
 March 27, 2013 
 Board of Directors 
 Hansen Medical, Inc. 
 800 East Middlefield Road 

Mountain View, CA 94043 
 Dear Sirs: 

I hereby voluntarily relinquish any rights to a cash incentive bonus in respect of Hansen Medical Inc.’s 2013 fiscal year and agree
that in lieu of a cash incentive bonus opportunity in respect of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year I am eligible for a performance restricted stock unit covering 115,627 shares of the Company’s common stock, which units will vest based on the
Company’s Corporate 2013 Critical Success Factors approved by the Board. I acknowledge and agree that this change will not constitute “Good Reason,” nor will it be considered to be a “Good Reason Event,” under the Retention
Agreement, dated May 26, 2010, between me and the Company. 
 Very truly yours, 
 /s/ Bruce J Barclay 
 Bruce J Barclay
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-22-2008

Earl Pondexter v. The Dept. of Housing

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-3486

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Earl Pondexter v. The Dept. of Housing" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 335.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/335
1

HLD-164 (September 2008) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3486

___________

IN RE: EARL A. PONDEXTER,

Petitioner

___________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to 01-cv-2161)

_____________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

September 30, 2008

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges

 (Opinion filed October 22, 2008) 

 

____________

OPINION

____________

PER CURIAM.

Earl Pondexter filed this pro se mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1651, seeking an order reversing the District Court’s order of dismissal and remanding

the case for trial. For the foregoing reasons, we will deny the petition. 

On November 15, 2001, Pondexter filed a lawsuit against the Department of

Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the Allegheny County Housing Authority
2

(“ACHA”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. 

On June 6, 2002, the District Court granted HUD’s motion to dismiss, and ordered

ACHA to answer. On September 13, 2006, the District Court granted ACHA leave to file

a motion for summary judgment, which the District Court granted on September 4, 2007.

Pondexter unsuccessfully sought reconsideration of that order and then appealed. His

appeal is currently pending before this Court at C.A. No. 07-4431.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy that is available only in extraordinary

circumstances. See In re Diet Drugs Prods Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). 

It is not a substitute for an appeal. In re Chambers Dev. Co., 148 F.3d 214, 226 (3d Cir.

1998) (“[M]andamus is not a substitute for appeal and a writ of mandamus will not be

granted if relief can be obtained by way of our appellate jurisdiction.”). As Pondexter’s

appeal of the District Court’s orders is currently pending before this Court, he has not

demonstrated that he is entitled to mandamus relief. According, we will deny his

mandamus petition.
# C_2007129EN.01001802.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/18

---

Action brought on 6 April 2007 — BVGD v Commission

(Case T-104/07)

(2007/C 129/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Belgische Vereniging van handelaars in- en uitvoerders geslepen diamant (Antwerpen, Belgium) (represented by: G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision dated 26 January 2007 by which the European Commission rejected the complaint lodged by BVGD for the reason that there are insufficient grounds for acting on it (Case COMP/39.221/B-2-BVGD/De Beers); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision dated 26 January 2007 by which the European Commission rejected the complaint lodged by BVGD for the reason that there are insufficient grounds for acting on it (Case COMP/39.221/B-2-BVGD/De Beers);

| — | order the European Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests the Commission's decision of 26 January 2007 in competition Case COMP/39.221/B-2 — BVGD/De Beers, by which the Commission rejected the applicant's complaint regarding violations of Articles 81 and 82 EC in connection with the Supplier of Choice system applied by the De Beers Group for the distribution of rough diamonds, with the reasoning that there is not sufficient Community interest to act further on the applicant's complaint.

The applicant alleges that De Beers — a producer of rough diamonds who, according to the applicant, was mainly involved upstream with the sale of rough diamonds — is trying through its Supplier of Choice system to extend its control of the market to cover the entire diamond pipeline from mine to consumer, i.e. also the downstream markets.

In support of its application, the applicant firstly claims a violation of its procedural rights as complainant. The applicant alleges i) that the Commission prevented it from exercising its right to have access under Article 8(1) of Regulation No 773/2004 (1) to the documents on which the Commission based its provisional assessment, ii) that the Commission put undue pressure on the applicant by its management of the time-limits in the case, iii) that the Commission created, in its correspondence with the applicant, confusion as to the stage of the procedure, and iv) that the Commission did not associate the applicant closely with the procedure.

1

Secondly, the applicant submits that the Commission violated the notion of Community interest and committed manifest errors of appraisal, erred in law and violated its duty to state reasons.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18).

1

---
Order filed, April 29, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00165

- CR

____________ ROBERTO ANTONIO LOPE Z MOLINA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1441402



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 25, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gail Rolen , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of ADESA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy C. Clayton,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18USC 1350), that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| /s/ TIMOTHY C. CLAYTON     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Timothy  C. Clayton        |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |
| November 8,  2006     |   |

 

*This certification accompanies the Report pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.*

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Jairus Tyrone HENLEY

No. 261P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Lisa Miles, Attorney at Law, Jairus Tyrone Henley, Defendant-Appellant, for Henley, Jairus Tyrone.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SPHERE OF LANGUAGE (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Bruce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: July 14, 2005

/s/ Ron Bruce



Ron Bruce

Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 146/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.146.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 146 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5631 May 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.146.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 146

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5631 May 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 462/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 462/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 192/31 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6631 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6631 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 192/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2023 to 30 April 2023(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2023/C 192/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2023 to 30 April 2023(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 8 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 192/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2023 to 30 April 2023(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2023/C 192/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2023 to 30 April 2023(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2011244EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/s3

---

NOTICE

On 23 August 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 244 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fifth supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for 1 year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
---

---

Exhibit 10.4

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference into all the registration statements of Nexus Telocation
Systems Ltd., on Form F-3 of our report dated January 31, 2005, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Shagrir Towing Services Ltd. and its subsidiary as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004 which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Fahn Kanne & Co. Certified Public Accounts
(Isr)

Tel-Aviv, IsraelJune 29,
2005



---

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August

25, 2016
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00041

- CV

DENBURY RESOURCES, I NC. AND DENBURY ONSH ORE, LLC , Appellant s
V.
GEMINI INSURANCE COM PANY , Appellee
On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 10397

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 5, 2014

. On August 19, 2016, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.
STATE of North Carolina, v. John Alan MITCHELL III, Defendant, and Melissa Hines, Bail Agent, and Agent Associates Insurance, L.L.C., Surety.

No. COA16-1323

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

VACATED, REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4212 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4212

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold improvement property, 
    qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement 
                               property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2014

Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Neal, Mr. Gerlach, and Mr. 
    Kind) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold improvement property, 
    qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement 
                               property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALIFIED LEASEHOLD 
              IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DEPRECIATION DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Clause (iv) of section 168(e)(3)(E) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``placed in 
service before January 1, 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2013.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALIFIED RESTAURANT 
              PROPERTY AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF DEPRECIATION 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Clause (v) of section 168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``placed in service before 
January 1, 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2013.

SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALIFIED RETAIL 
              IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DEPRECIATION DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Clause (ix) of section 168(e)(3)(E) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``, and before 
January 1, 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021053EN.01004301.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/43

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Bonicelli v Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking

(Case T-520/20) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Replacement of the contested act in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 53/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Tullio Bonicelli (Badalona, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: G. T. Poszler, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decision of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy of 24 October 2019 not to include the name of the applicant on the final list of officials promoted within the framework of the 2019 promotion exercise and, secondly, of its decision of 8 May 2020 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by Mr Tullio Bonicelli. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by Mr Tullio Bonicelli.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Cameron Durand CLARK

No. COA16-1194

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 19, 2017

NO ERROR.