alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                               Consent of KPMG LLP


To Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-15877, 333-51681, and 333-79579) on Form S-8 of Northfield Laboratories Inc.
of our report dated June 29, 2000, relating to the balance sheets of Northfield
Laboratories Inc. as of May 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended May 31, 2000 and for the cumulative period from
June 19, 1985 (inception) through May 31, 2000, which report appears in the May
31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Northfield Laboratories Inc.


KPMG LLP  [LOGO]


Chicago, Illinois
August 16, 2000
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 33-90820,  33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services,
Inc. on Forms S-8,  Registration  Statement No.  333-20499 of PennFed  Financial
Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration  Statement No. 333-36031 of PennFed
Capital Trust I on Form S-2 of our report dated July 28, 1999, appearing in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of PennFed  Financial  Services,  Inc.  for the year
ended June 30, 1999.




/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 23, 1999
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Dennis Grinsteiner, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First State Financial Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to de designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including our consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared:  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.        Date:  August 4, 2005 By*:  /s/ Dennis Grinsteiner*   Dennis Grinsteiner   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 345

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JAMES WILLIAMS , A ppellant ,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 1 78 th District Court of Harris County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria , and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, James Williams

, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated

assault entered in the 178th District Court of Harris County 1

. On Ju ne 10 , 2020

, the trial

court sentenced appellant. O n July 16, 2020, a ppellant filed a notice of appeal

. On August

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston, pursuant to docket equalization order Misc. Docket No. 20

- 9090 issued by the Supreme Court of Texas.2 20 , 2020 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not

timely perfected . Appellant was further informed the appeal would be dismissed if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court ’ s directive

. Furthermore, o n August 25, 2020, t his Court notified appellant’s counsel that the

trial court’s certification indicated the a ppellant waived his right to appeal and ordered

counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal;

and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a

right to appeal, or, altern atively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended

certification.

On September 25, 2020 , counsel filed a brief with this Court. The brief does not

establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect, or (2) that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

provide s that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show

that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P.

37.1, 44.3, 44.4.

Furthermore, t his Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a

timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to

address the merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTIO N and the

motion to withdraw is DISMISSED as moot.3 JAIME TIJERINA Justice

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 21st day of January , 202 1

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

May 22, 2006
In the MATTER OF: E.R.

No. COA16-1320

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# L_2004353EN.01S00301.xml

| 27.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 353/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 353/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Frankie Eugene SHIPMAN.

No. COA15-1146.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No error at trial; Vacated and Remanded as to Restitution.
Order entered December 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00747-CR

SANTOS ANTONIO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-59381-U

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Debi Harris to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1, a DVD.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Debi Harris, Auxiliary

Court Reporter; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radial Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2006 (the "Report"),
I, G. Leigh Lyons, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        By:      /S/ G. LEIGH LYONS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             G. Leigh Lyons
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 17, 2006


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
STATE v. Derrick A. ROGERS

160P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Derrick A. Rogers, for Rogers, Derrick A.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of May 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Donna Lehmann, as Chief Financial Officer of BH/RE,L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”) certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(A) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B) the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 15,  2005 |                     |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                               |                     |
|                               |                     |
|                               | /S/ Donna  Lehmann       |   |
|                               | Donna Lehmann            |
|                               | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE> 5
 <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        
 <S>                               <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-26-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-26-1997
 <CASH>                                                 840
 <SECURITIES>                                             0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                       20,168
 <ALLOWANCES>                                           300
 <INVENTORY>                                         23,084
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    45,984
 <PP&E>                                              54,983
 <DEPRECIATION>                                      27,540
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     111,681
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,373
 <BONDS>                                             48,619
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
 <PREFERRED>                                         13,965
 <COMMON>                                                59
 <OTHER-SE>                                          22,706
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       111,681
 <SALES>                                            143,061
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   143,061
 <CGS>                                              109,155
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                      109,155
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    25,311
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,143
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,651
 <INCOME-TAX>                                         2,100
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,551
 <DISCONTINUED>                                           0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
 <CHANGES>                                                0
 <NET-INCOME>                                         2,551
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.26
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.26
         
 
</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina, v. Asia Nicole MANN, Defendant.

No. COA15-30.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General M. Shawn Maier, for the State.

Parish & Cooke, by James R. Parish, for defendant.

**Opinion**

Appeal by defendant from Judgment entered 21 July 2014 by Judge Eric L. Levinson in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 August 2015.

1

We employ this pseudonym to protect the confidentiality of the juvenile in this case.

2

We acknowledge that these unpublished cases are not controlling legal authority, however, the analysis is relevant to this appeal.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136505 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136505 

 COA: 281682 

Jackson CC: 02-005990-FH 

EDWARD ALTON RUGGLES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
In the MATTER OF: T.Z.J.

No. COA17-73

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

VACATED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Antione Cedric MCKENITH

No. 355P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, for McKenith, Antione Cedric.

Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
The STATE v. WILLIAMS.

A15A1858

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

January 24, 2018

Richard A. Mallard, District Attorney, Keith A. McIntyre, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant.

Robert L. Persse, Statesboro, for appellee.

Branch, Judge.

*845In *State v. Williams* , 336 Ga. App. 97, 783 S.E.2d 700 (2016), this Court reversed the trial court's grant of Michael Lloyd Williams's motion to suppress his statement to police following arrest. The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and directed that the case be remanded to the trial court for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for its legal conclusions with regard to Williams's motion to suppress. *Williams v. State* , 301 Ga. 60, 799 S.E.2d 779 (2017). We therefore vacate our previous opinion, adopt the decision of the Supreme Court, and remand this case to the trial court for clarification of its findings in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision.

*Case remanded with direction.*

Miller, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41288

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CORNELIOUS JOSEPH GREEN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-173-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cornelious Joseph Green has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Green has not filed a response. The record is

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Green’s claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel; such claim(s) generally “cannot be resolved on

direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no

opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.”

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-41288

2

United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record

and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth,
      Inc.
      do hereby certify that:





(a)
      the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of PureDepth, Inc. for the period ended July
      31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
      Inc.







Dated:
      December 4, 2007








/s/
      Thomas L. Marcus





Thomas
      L.
      Marcus


Chief
      Executive Officer







/s/
      Jonathan J. McCaman





Jonathan
      J. McCaman


Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12   STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST / LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Amounts in thousands except ratio amounts)
 Year ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings before fixed charges:Income before allocation of minority interest
and income from investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries (1)
    
    $
    152,196
    
    
    $
    150,559
    
    
    $
    163,230
    
    
    $
    216,392
    
    
    $
    141,198Add: Interest expense
    
    
    150,669
    
    
    
    122,642
    
    
    
    105,376
    
    
    
    104,772
    
    
    
    92,828Depreciation expense on
capd interest
    
    
    1,245
    
    
    
    5,393
    
    
    
    4,437
    
    
    
    3,829
    
    
    
    3,442Amortization of deferred
financing costs
    
    
    4,529
    
    
    
    4,065
    
    
    
    3,889
    
    
    
    3,963
    
    
    
    3,475Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    308,639
    
    
    $
    282,659
    
    
    $
    276,932
    
    
    $
    328,956
    
    
    $
    240,943Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    150,669
    
    
    $
    122,967
    
    
    $
    105,376
    
    
    $
    104,772
    
    
    $
    92,828Amortization of deferred financing charges
    
    
    4,529
    
    
    
    4,065
    
    
    
    3,889
    
    
    
    3,963
    
    
    
    3,475Capitalized interest
    
    
    19,958
    
    
    
    45,697
    
    
    
    30,837
    
    
    
    17,748
    
    
    
    13,242Fixed charges
    
    
    175,156
    
    
    
    172,729
    
    
    
    140,102
    
    
    
    126,483
    
    
    
    109,545Preferred share distributions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Preferred unit distributions
    
    
    21,012
    
    
    
    17,126
    
    
    
    13,691
    
    
    
    12,095
    
    
    
    11,844Combined fixed charges
    
    $
    196,168
    
    
    $
    189,855
    
    
    $
    153,793
    
    
    $
    138,578
    
    
    $
    121,389Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.76
    
    
    
    1.64
    
    
    
    1.98
    
    
    
    2.60
    
    
    
    2.20Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    
    
    1.57
    
    
    
    1.49
    
    
    
    1.80
    
    
    
    2.37
    
    
    
    1.98
 
 (1)
    
    Amounts for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been
reclassified to present properties that have been sold or held for sale through March 31, 2009. As
a result, operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations from continuing operations
for all periods presented.