alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Netlist, Inc., aDelaware corporation (“Netlist”) for the quarter ended June 28, 2008 (the “Report”),Chun K. Hong, president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board ofNetlist, and Gail Itow, vice president and chief financial officer of Netlist,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his orher knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Netlist, Inc.

 
|   | August 7, 2008 |                                                         | /s/ Chun K. Hong |
|--------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|   |                | Chun K. Hong                                                 |
|   |                | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|   |                | (Principal Executive Officer)                                |
|   |                |                                                         |
|   |                |                                                         |
|   | August 7, 2008 |                                                         | /s/ Gail Itow    |
|   |                | Gail Itow                                                    |
|   |                | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                   |
|   |                | (Principal Financial Officer)                                |
|        |                     |                                                              |                  |  |

 

----
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-10T13:14:37Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-10T13:14:38Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-10T13:14:38Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="17008">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-10T13:14:37Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>THE ATTORNEY GENERM~ 
OF TEXAS 
</p>
<p>OPINION l-O:6023 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
Exhibit 99
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS OF DO GROUP, INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board of Directors
DO Group, Inc.
Elkhart, Indiana

 
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of DO Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as ofMarch 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income and accumulateddeficit and cash flows for the years then ended (which do not appear herein).  Those financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on those financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.  Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance aboutwhether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining,on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Anaudit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made bymanagement, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe thatour audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of DO Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of March 31, 2000and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
 
Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
Elkhart, Indiana
June 23, 2000
STATE v. Jonathan Eugene DIXON

67P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2018

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, For Dixon, Jonathan Eugene.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of March 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of March 2018."

Ervin, J. Recused
# Official Journal C 139/20 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 139 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5920 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 139

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5920 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2016/C 139/1 | Report on budgetary and financial management for 2015 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2016/C 139/1

Report on budgetary and financial management for 2015

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Martinez Orlando BLACK

No. 329A09-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Ms. Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Mr. Martinez Orlandis Black, Mr. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, for Black, Martinez Orlando.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Jackson, J. recused
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5482-5483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1933--ASTM International--Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International--
Standards (``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided 
an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities 
originating after July 15, 2004, designated as Work Items. A complete 
listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is 
available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 
telephone <greek-i>

[[Page 5483]]

610-832-9597, e-mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2a313c2c373b301e3f2d2a3370312c39"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="13677c71617a767d537260677e3d7c6174">[email protected]</span></a>.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1967 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In the Interest of O.P., a child. ) ___________________________________) ) J.P., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2340 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed March 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Christine Greider, Judge. J.P., pro se. Meredith K. Hall, Appellate Counsel, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. David P. Krupski, Appellate Counsel, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Khari Dewayne McCLELLAND, Defendant.

No. COA15-344.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton

ONDEO DEGREMON T, INC. AND AMERICAN & FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1261-04-2 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 26, 2004 DANIEL S. ROMAN

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Lisa Frisina Clement; Penn, St uart & Eskridge, on briefs), for appellants. (Christopher C. Booberg; Thor sen & Scher L.L.P., on brief), for appellee.

Ondeo Degremont, Inc. and its insurer appe al a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, which ruled that Daniel S. Roman sustained his burden of proving a compensable occupational disease, Mixed Connective Tissue Disord er, arising out of and in the course of his employment. We have reviewed the record a nd the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, for the reas ons stated by the commission in its final opinion, we affirm the

award. See Roman v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc. , VWC File No. 210-82-59 (May 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affi rm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th e Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 In rendering our decision, we grant employe r’s Motion to Admit Exhibits B, C, and D into the record on appeal, and deny claimant’s Motion to Strike Questions to Be Presented.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Frederick Lwee, Principal Financial Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: FEBRUARY 16, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ FREDERICK LWEE         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | FREDERICK LWEE             
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Information Reporting Program Advisory Committee; Renewal of 
Charter

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Charter for the Information Reporting Program Advisory 
Committee will renew for a two-year period beginning November 4, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Caryl Grant, National Public 
Liaison, 202-927-3641 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given under section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), 
and with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury to announce the 
renewal of the Information Reporting Program Advisory Committee 
(IRPAC). The primary purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide an 
organized public forum for discussion of relevant information reporting 
issues of mutual concern as between Internal Revenue Service (``IRS'') 
officials and representatives of the public. Advisory committee members 
convey the public's perception of IRS activities, advise with respect 
to specific information reporting administration issues, provide 
constructive observations regarding current or proposed IRS policies, 
programs, and procedures, and propose significant improvements in 
information reporting operations and the Information Reporting Program. 
Members are comprised of a diverse group of dedicated and talented 
professionals who bring substantial disparate experience and 
backgrounds to the Committee activities. Membership is balanced to 
include representation from the taxpaying public, the tax professional 
community, small and large businesses, state tax administrators, 
academics, preparers, and the payroll community.

    Dated: September 28, 2005.
C. Anthony Burke,
Branch Chief, National Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-19780 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

2... See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.33, 29.02(a)(2) (Vernon 2003). 

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-433-CR

ANTHONY D. WASHINGTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Anthony D. Washington appeals his twelve-year sentence for

robbery.2 We affirm.

In an open plea to the trial court, appellant pleaded guilty to robbery.

After hearing evidence and argument, the trial court sentenced appellant to
3... TEX. R. APP. P. 21.6 (providing generally that defendant must present

motion for new trial to trial court within ten days of its filing); Thompson v.

State, 243 S.W.3d 774, 775–76 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, pet. ref’d);

Crawford v. State, No. 02-04-00299-CR, 2005 WL 1477958 (Tex. App.—Fort

Worth June 23, 2005, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication) (holding that

disproportionate sentence claim must be preserved for appellate review); see

Carranza v. State, 960 S.W.2d 76, 78 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that

appellant had burden not only to file motion for new trial, but also to “present”

it to the trial court).

4... Carranza, 960 S.W.2d at 79.

5... See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.6; Carranza, 960 S.W.2d at 79. 

2

twelve years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice. 

In his sole point on appeal, appellant contends that the trial court abused

its discretion in sentencing him to twelve years’ confinement because the

sentence was disproportionate to the crime committed. 

Although appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, he has failed to

preserve his complaint because the record does not indicate that he presented

his motion for new trial to the trial court.

3

 The term “present” means the

record must show that the movant for a new trial sustained the burden of

actually delivering the motion for new trial to the attention or actual notice of

the trial court.

4

 Here, the record establishes that Appellant timely filed his

motion for new trial, but it does not show that he actually delivered it to the

trial court or otherwise brought it to the trial court’s attention.5 Accordingly,
3

because appellant did not preserve his claim regarding the alleged

disproportionate sentencing, we overrule his sole point. The trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

PUBLISH

DELIVERED: August 29, 2008
Eddricco Li'shaun BROWN v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 345P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 16, 2017

Eddricco Brown, for Brown, Eddrico Li'shaun.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 16th of October 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mitchell County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of October 2017."
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1

                          ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


(a) Ascend Foreign Sales Corporation

(b) Ascend Credit Corporation

(c) Ascend Communications Europe Limited (United Kingdom)

(d) Ascend Communications France SARL

(e) Ascend Communications Premea SARL

(f) Ascend Communications Japan KK

(g) Ascend Australia Pty. Limited (Australia)

(h) Ascend Communications GmbH (Germany)

(i) Ascend Communications (HK) Limited (Hong Kong)

(j) Ascend Communications Canada Ltd.

(k) Ascend Communications Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)

(l) Ascend Communications Benelux (Belgium)

(m) Ascend Communications Nordic AB (Sweden)

(n) Ascend Communications SRL (Italy)

(o) Ascend Communications M.E., Inc.

(p) NetStar International, Ltd.

(q) StonyBrook Services Inc.

(r) Whitetree, Inc.

(s) InterCon Systems Corporation

(t) Sahara Networks, Inc.

(u) Cascade Communications Corp.

(v) Cascade Communications Securities Corporation

(w) Cascade Communications Asia Corporation

(x) Cascade Communications HC Corporation

(y) Arris Networks, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1
                          ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
            SUBSIDIARIES OF ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (continued)


(z) Cascade Export, Inc.

(aa) Cascade Communications Limited (United Kingdom)

(ab) Cascade Communications, LTDA (Brazil)

(ac) Cascade Communications (Canada) Corp.

(ad) Cascade Communications France SARL
**Exhibit
          32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
            connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of National Patent
            Development Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
            2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
            hereof,
            (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby
            certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant
            to
            (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
            his
            knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
          JEROME I. FELDMAN
 Name:  Jerome
          I.
          Feldman
 Title:  Chief
          Executive Officer
 Date:  May
            31,
            2007
  /s/
          SCOTT N. GREENBERG
 Name:  Scott
          N.
          Greenberg
 Title:  Chief
          Financial Officer
 Date:  May
            31,
            2007
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**ANSWERSCORPORATION**

**FORM 10-QFOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I am the Chief Financial Officer of AnswersCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering thiscertificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended September 30, 2007 and filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (“Form 10-Q”).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I herebycertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: November 9, 2007         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ STEVEN STEINBERG           |
|   |                           |
|   | Steven Steinberg               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

1

----
Annette BAKER, Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. The NORTH CAROLINA PSYCHOLOGY BOARD, Defendant.

No. COA16-1175

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.