alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000921066            
<NAME>                        Restaurant Teams International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,606,245
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,132,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    43,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,781,968
<PP&E>                                         6,740,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                 350,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,171,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          538,718
<BONDS>                                        4,673,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       68,334
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,891,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,171,485
<SALES>                                        3,705,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,913,295
<CGS>                                          968,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,825,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,560,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,441,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (121,240)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,320,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,320,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.21)
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Lee MCNAIR

No. 230P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, Anthony Lee McNair, for McNair, Anthony Lee

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of July 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of July 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of August 2017 by Defendant to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137059 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 137059 

 COA: 276596 

Wayne CC: 06-010156-01

GREGORY ANTOINE COOK II,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Martin E. ROCK v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE PARK OF DURHAM ASSOCIATION, INC., Claimant

No. 428P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Martin E. Rock, for Rock, Martin E.

J. Matthew Waters, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Executive Office Park of Durham Association, Inc.

Hope Derby Carmichael, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Executive Office Park of Durham Association, Inc.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th of December 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for Writ of Prohibition, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2017 by Petitioner for Sanctions:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT The undersigned, Thomas E. Mangold, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), and Timothy A. Bienek,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 15, 2004 /s/ Thomas E. MangoldThomas E. MangoldPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. /s/ Timothy A. BienekTimothy A. BienekExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1514

MARGARET NJOB TESAMBOM NGBATKAM, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: December 30, 2009 Decided: January 19, 2010

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danielle L. C. Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, David H. Wetmore, O ffice of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Margaret Njob Tesambom Ngbatkam, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Ngbatkam first challenges the determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. We have reviewed the administrative record, the immigration judge’s decision, and the Board’s affirmance thereof, and find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s ruling that Ngbatkam failed to establish persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of membership in a particular social group, political opinion, or any other protected ground. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2006) (defining refugee). We therefore uphold the denial of relief. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Ngbatkam’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”

Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because

23 Ngbatkam failed to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. Finally, we find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Ngbatkam failed to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country

of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208 .16(c)(2) (2009). We find that Ngbatkam failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


Valley Financial Corporation





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-126298 and 333-46488) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-156683 and 333-120311) on Form S-3 of Valley Financial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Valley Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Valley Financial Corporation and subsidiaries.





/s/ Elliott Davis, LLC





Galax, Virginia


March 26, 2010
# C_2008301EN.01006404.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/64

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-204/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/122)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
COURTNEY NC LLC v. BALDWIN

219P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Monette Baldwin, for Baldwin, Monette.

A. Bartlett White, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephanie D'Atri, Attorney at Law, for Courtney NC, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of August 2017 by Defendant for Leave to Add a Supplement to Revised Motion to Amend Petition for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion to Stay:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Beasley, J. and Morgan, J. recused
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00430

- CR

No. 10

- 16

- 00433

- CR

IN RE RAHEEM ABDULLA H WATKINS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition s for writ of mandamus is denied. 1

AL SCOGGINS
Justice

1 Relator’s petition s for writ of mandamus lack proof of service on the State, which is th e real party

in interest in these proceeding s because it was a party in the underlying criminal case s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.2. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties (i.e., the trial

- court judge and the State through the district attorney in this proceeding) and must contain proof of service. Id. at R. 9.5. Here, relator indicates in his proof of service that he has served these document s on this Court, rather

than the trial

- court judge and the S tate. However, to expedite these matter s , we invoke Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend these requirements. Id. at R. 2.In re Watkins Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins

Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed December 28, 2016 [OT06]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul R.
Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: May 20, 2004                      /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55655-55656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Audit and Financial Management Advisory (AFMAC)


Committee Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration's Audit and Financial

[[Page 55656]]

Management Advisory Committee (AFMAC) will host a public meeting on 
Friday, September 23, 2005. The meeting will be take place at the U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Office of Chief 
Financial Officer Conference Room, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. The 
AFMAC was established by the Administrator of the SBA to provide 
recommendation and advice regarding the Agency's financial management 
including the financial reporting process, systems of internal 
controls, audit process and process for monitoring compliance with 
relevant laws and regulations.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Thomas Dumaresq in writing or 
by fax. Thomas Dumaresq, Chief Financial Officer , 409 3rd Street SW., 
Washington DC 20416, phone (202) 205-6506, fax: (202) 205-6869, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b1adaaa8a4b6eba1b0a8a4b7a0b6b485b6a7a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bffe3e4e6eaf8a5effee6eaf9eef8facbf8e9eaa5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18889 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Amendment of notice of invitation to tender for refunds on common wheat exported to certain third countries

(Official Journal of the European Union C 148 of 24 June 2006)

(2006/C 198/06)

On page 46, point 1 of Title III ‘TENDERS’ is replaced by the following:

----
EXHIBIT 32
                                      ==========




     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT






The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Frederick Fisher,
the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Golden Hope Resources Corp., hereby certifies that:


1. the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Golden Hope Resources Corp.


                                          GOLDEN HOPE RESOURCES CORP.,
                                          Registrant

Dated: August 23, 2005                      /s/ Frederick Fisher
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          By: Frederick Fisher, President,
                                              Chief Executive Officer,
                                              Treasuer, Chief Financial
                                              Officer, Principal Accounting
                                              Officer and Director
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 10
- 00085
- CV
IN RE WAYNE ERNEST B ARKER
Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Wayne Ernest Barker, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There are procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond those problems and deny the petition. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2. Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 12.1(b); Append ix to
T EX
. R. A PP
. P ., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). S ee also T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 5; 10 TH T EX
. A PP
. (W ACO ) L OC

. R. 5; T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under the se circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filingIn re Barker Page 2

fees in this case. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 2. The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Barker.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2010 [OT06]
State of North Carolina v. Harold Lamont Fletcher

No. 94PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Fletcher, Harold Lamont.

Ms. Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of March 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
      for
      the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra K. Harlow, Chief Financial Officer of Third
      Century Bancorp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that


(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Third
                Century Bancorp.











/s/Debra
                K. HarlowVice
                President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)





November
      13, 2006





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
      and is not being filed for any other purpose.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6789

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

LAKENDRICK FOBBS, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00310-H-1; 5:07-cv-00115-H) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lakendrick Fobbs, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Lakendrick Fobbs seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude Fobbs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Rodger DUBOSE

No. 248P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Dubose, Jason Rodger.

Daniel Hirschman, Special Deputy Attorney General, Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."