alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gustavo Goyzueta, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pure Biofuels Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  November 17, 2006 | /s/ Gustavo Goyzueta
Gustavo Goyzueta
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------
----

(2004/C 65 E/283)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3154/03

by Michael Cashman (PSE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Mobile telephone safety

Given the findings of recent studies which show that the new generation of mobile telephones can interfere with many types of heart pacemaker, can the Commission detail what measures are being taken to prevent harm to the health of EU citizens?

It would seem that newer pacemakers that are fitted with a ceramic filter are immune. Can the Commission confirm that steps are being taken to introduce these models across the industry and to ensure that the public are aware of the risks of using the old models?

Can the Commission also detail what information it has provided regarding the safety of using mobile telephones in conjunction with a pacemaker since 1994?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(3 November 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

----
STATE v. Antwan ANTHONY

324A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2017

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, Jonathan E. Broun, Attorney at Law, Durham, Kathryn L. VandeBerg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Anthony, Antwan.

Kimberly Robb, Assistant District Attorney, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of September 2017 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Trial Transcript:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2017."
STATE of North Carolina v. James Gregory ARMISTEAD

No. 422P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 5, 2018

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Armistead, James Gregory

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Toni Michelle Drake Denning, Attorney at Law, for State of North Carolina

Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of December 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of April 2018."
In the MATTER OF: M.G.S.

No. COA17-238

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

AFFIRMED.
Nathaniel R. WEBB v. Melanie SHEKITA

No. 323P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Nathaniel R. Webb, for Webb, Nathaniel R.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of September 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for Writ of Prohibition, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard B. SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 77-5590

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 3, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1978.

*1176Harold Mendelow, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Jacob V. Eskenazi, U. S. Atty., Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MORGAN, CLARK and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; *see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

In this case involving the warrantless search by postal inspectors of a postal employee’s locker at the post office, the salient facts are essentially the same as those presented in *United States v. Bunkers,*521 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*423 U.S. 989, 96 S.Ct. 400, 46 L.Ed.2d 307 (1975). We adopt the rationale of the Ninth Circuit in that case and uphold the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Trevor J. Yeomans, ACSM, P.Eng., and reports, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Pirquitas Mine, Jujuy Province, Argentina dated December 23, 2011, and NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada dated November 19, 2014 (the “ Reports ”), and the information contained in the Reports that I prepared, or reviewed and approved, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 22nd day of March, 2017.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ Trevor J. Yeomans


Trevor J. Yeomans, ACSM, P.Eng.
(as amended and restated effective as of March 26, 2008)
 Agreement  Company  Participant
  Plan Committee
 Common Stock
   Grant of Shares  Shares  Grant Date Section 2 Restricted Stock
 Restrictions on Transfer
 Restricted Stock
 Retention of Certificates Section 4(a)




---



##### 



RS
Property Section 3(a) Restricted Stock
 Rights with Regard to Restricted Stock Section 8 Section 3(a)
 Vesting Section 5
 Vesting Date
    
    Number of SharesFirst Anniversary of Grant Date
    
    
    [25%]Second Anniversary of Grant Date
    
    
    [25%]Third Anniversary of Grant Date
    
    
    [25%]Fourth Anniversary of Grant Date
    
    
    [25%]
 provided however
    2




---



##### 



Section 4(a)
 Forfeiture
 Withholding
 Section 83(b) Section
3(e)
 Delivery Delay
 Legend
 Company Plan
 3




---



##### 



Securities Representations
  Act Section
5
   No Obligation to Continue Employment
 Power of Attorney
 Rights as a Stockholder
 4




---



##### 



Provisions of Plan Control
 Amendment
 Notices Notice
  th
   Acceptance
 Non-Compete; Nonsolicitation
  5




---



##### 



Noncompete
Period
  Section 13(a)
 Section 13(a)
 Confidential Information
 6




---



##### 



Waiver of Jury Trial
 Miscellaneous
   Dispute Agreed Venue
 7




---



##### 



Section 11
    8




---



##### 



TOWN SPORTS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.By:Name:Title: PARTICIPANTSignature
Eddricco Li'shaun BROWN v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 345P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2017

Eddricco Brown, for Brown, Eddrico Li'shaun.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 18th of December 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mitchell County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of December 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of December 2017 by Petitioner for Avernment of Jurisdiction:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of December 2017."
Dennis JENKINS, Petitioner v. Kelly J. THOMAS, Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles, Department of Transportation and Highway Safety, State of North Carolina, Respondent

No. COA17-224

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

REVERSED. REMANDED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00611-CV

David Allan EDWARDS,

Appellant

v.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ATASCOSA COUNTY, TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-02-0185-CVA

Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that the parties shall each bear their own costs of appeal. 

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15d-14(b) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp.
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Bradley M. Colby, President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the
      best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Eternal Energy Corp. and will
      be retained by Eternal Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/BRADLEY
                M. COLBYBradley
                M. ColbyPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer,Treasurer
                and Chief Financial OfficerEternal
                Energy Corp.May
                15, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE NAVA
,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1320

[ June 1, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

56 2018CF003199B

.

Jacob M. Noble, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARN ER
, M AY and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40340

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDWIN AVELINO TURCIOS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-81-2

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edwin Avelino Turcios appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty

plea conviction of conspiring to distribute, dispense, and possess with the intent

to distribute and dispense 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance

containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine and 50 grams or more of

methamphetamine. Turcios argues that his sentence is unreasonable because

the district court did not apply a two-level downward adjustment in his offense

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40340

2

level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) based on his status as a “minor

participant” in his offense of conviction. 

Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), we review a

district court’s sentencing decisions for reasonableness in light ofthe sentencing

factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596-97

(2007); United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008).

We continue to review a district court’s legal determinations de novo and its

factual findings, such as its determination of a defendant’s role in the offense,

for clear error. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d at 764.

To be eligible for a minor-role adjustment, a defendant “must have been

peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity.” United States v. Miranda,

248 F.3d 434, 447 (5th Cir. 2001). Turcios participated in the instant offense by

relaying directions to the location of the transaction, conducting what appeared

to be counter-surveillance while his co-defendant met with an informant, and

ensuring that the transaction took place. The district court’s finding that

Turcios was not a minor participant is plausible in light of the record as a whole

and therefore not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d

193, 203-04 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Turcios does not contend that his sentence is otherwise procedurally or

substantively unreasonable. See Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 596-97. Nor has Turcios

shown that his sentence, which falls within a properly calculated sentencing

guidelines range, is unreasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551,

554 (5th Cir. 2006). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Everette HINTON

No. 449P11-16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th of March 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of March 2017 by Defendant for Full Evidentiary Hearing and Trial De Novo:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of March 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of April 2017 by Defendant for a Trial De Novo:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of April 2017 by Defendant for Trial by Jury:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 16 January 2008 – Inter‐Ikea v OHIM – Waibel (idea)**

**(Case T-112/06)**

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community figurative mark ‘idea’ – Earlier Community and national figurative and word marks ‘IKEA’ – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 80-81, 85)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 February 2006 (Case R 80/2005-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Inter Ikea Systems BV and Walter Waibel. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Registered Community trade mark subject to an action for cancellation: | Figurative mark ‘idea’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 20 and 42 – Application No 283952 |
| Proprietor of the Community trade mark: | Walter Waibel |
| Party bringing the action for cancellation: | Inter-Ikea Systems BV |
| Trade mark of the applicant for cancellation: | Various figurative and word marks, Community and national, for goods in Classes 16, 20 and 42 |
| Decision of the Cancellation Division: | Cancellation of the mark ‘idea’ |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of application |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Inter-Ikea Systems BV to pay the costs, including those incurred by Walter Waibel in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1334

NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

and

WOW, INCORPORATED, t/a Insurance Center of

Williamsburg; DEBORAH BRESNAHAM,

Third Party Defendants - Appellees,

versus

RICHARD LYNWOOD CHISMAN, a/k/a Bay; JOYCE ANN

CHISMAN,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-99-362-3)

Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kenneth L. Roberts, ROBERTS & ROBERTS, P.C., Newport News, Virginia, for Appellants. Robert Tayloe Ross, Michael L. Rigsby, MIDKIFF

MUNCIE & ROSS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Douglas M. Palais,

MCCANDLISH, KANE & GRANT, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lynwood Chisman and Joyce Ann Chisman appeal from the

district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

Appellees in this action in which National Grange Mutual Insurance

Company sought a declaration that the insurance policy it issued to

the Chismans was void. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the

joint appendix, the supplemental joint appendix, and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. National Grange

Mut. Ins. Co. v. Chisman, No. CA-99-362-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Charles KNIGHT

No. COA17-848

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 20, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                                   |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Corinthian Schools, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware                     
|Rhodes Colleges, Inc.                                              |  | Delaware                     
|Rhodes Business Group, Inc.                                        |  | Delaware                     
|Florida Metropolitan University, Inc.                              |  | Florida                      
|Corinthian Property Group, Inc.                                    |  | Florida                      
|Grand Rapids Educational Center, Inc.                              |  | Michigan                     
|National School of Technology, Inc.                                |  | Florida                      
|Ward Stone College, Inc.                                           |  | Florida                      
|Titan Schools, Inc. (formerly known as Wyo-Tech Acquisition Corp.) |  | Delaware                     
|MJB Acquisition Corp.                                              |  | Wyoming                      
|Pegasus Education, Inc.                                            |  | Delaware                     
|Career Choices, Inc.                                               |  | California                   
|Sequoia Education, Inc.                                            |  | California                   
|Ashmead Education, Inc.                                            |  | Washington                   
|Eton Education, Inc.                                               |  | Washington                   
|ECAT Acquisition, Inc.                                             |  | Delaware                     
|CDI Education USA, Inc.                                            |  | Delaware                     
|2020584 Ontario Limited                                            |  | Ontario                      
|CDI Career Development Institutes Limited                          |  | Canada                       
|Career Canada C.F.P. Limited                                       |  | Canada