alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-90820, 33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services, Inc.
on Forms S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20499 of PennFed Financial
Services, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-36031 of PennFed
Capital Trust I on Form S-2 of our report dated July 25, 2001, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennFed Financial Services, Inc. for the year
ended June 30, 2001.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 21, 2001
# C_2008313EN.01005702.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Bui Van v Commission

(Case F-51/07) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Classification in grade and step - Improper classification - Withdrawal of a measure vitiated by illegality - Legitimate expectations - Reasonable time-limit - Rights of the defence - Right to sound administration)

(2008/C 313/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Bui Van (Hettange-Grande, France) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and R. Albelice, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the Director General of the Commission's Joint Research Centre of 4 October 2006 in so far as it reclassifies the applicant in Grade AST 3, whereas he was initially classified in Grade AST 4 and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay Mr Bui Van the sum of EUR 1 500 by way of damages; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay Mr Bui Van the sum of EUR 1 500 by way of damages;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Mr Bui Van to pay two thirds of his costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Bui Van to pay two thirds of his costs;

| 4. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay its own costs and one third of the costs incurred by Mr Bui Van. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay its own costs and one third of the costs incurred by Mr Bui Van.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007, p. 43.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Year        Year       Year        Year       Year      Mar. 18,    Jan. 1,
                                           Ended      Ended       Ended      Ended       Ended      1994 -     1994 -
                                         Dec. 31,    Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,    Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,    Dec. 31,   Mar. 17,
                                           1999        1998       1997        1996       1995        1994       1994
                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>
 Income (loss) before income taxes          $11,877    $ 5,279   $  (6,218)  $ 11,969     $ 6,923    $ 9,585      $ 2,857


 Interest                                     8,097
                                                         8,896       9,091      9,517       9,607      6,867          115


 Interest portion of rental expense
                                              2,353        673         646        714         645        237           24


 Amortization of debt expenses
                                                347        473         456        376         376        264            -
                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Earnings                                   $22,870   $ 15,321    $  3,975   $ 22,576    $ 17,551   $ 16,953      $ 2,996
                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Fixed charges                              $10,797   $ 10,042    $ 10,193   $ 10,607    $ 10,628   $  7,368      $   139
                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Ratio
                                                2.1        1.5         0.4        2.1         1.7        2.3         21.6
                                        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

 (1)    All dollars in thousands.



                                       66
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| March 2, 2008                                |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |        |  |                                  
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------
|                   |  |        |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                   |  | Name:  |  | J. Roe Buckley                   
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer          
|                   |  |        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 6, 2010
By           /s/ Raymond D. ZinnRaymond D. ZinnChief Executive Officer











Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 6, 2010
By           /s/ Clyde R. WallinClyde R. WallinChief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Byron Bernard SADLER

No. 124P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Byron Bernard Sadler, for Sadler, Byron Bernard.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th of April 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of April 2017 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Douglas P. Teitelbaum, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of BH/RE, LLC, a Nevada Limited-Liability Company;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)   disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)   any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:  November 15, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Douglas P. Teitelbaum |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Douglas P. Teiltelbaum    |
|   | Manager                   |

 

----
Laura Leigh LINKER, Plaintiff, v. Timothy Lyon LINKER, Defendant.

No. COA17-894

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC v. ETRANSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

330A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 24, 2017

Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, John T. Kivus, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Christopher Jackson, Attorney at Law, for Allscripts Healthcare, LLC.

Tracie H. Brisson, Attorney at Law, for Etransmedia Technology, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of February 2017 by Dana L. Salazar for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of March 2017."
STATE of North Carolina v. Eric Scott TURNER

No. 457P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 20, 2017

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Turner, Eric Scott.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Melissa H. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of December 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57601-57602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Final Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant (IAAP), in Burlington, Iowa 
as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
August 25, 2005, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the

[[Page 57602]]

following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

    Department of Energy (DOE) employees or DOE contractor or 
subcontractor employees who worked as radiographers from May 1948 to 
March 1949 in support of Line 1 operations at the Iowa Army 
Ammunition Plant and who were employed for a number of work days 
aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring under this employment 
in combination with work days of employment occurring within the 
parameters (excluding aggregate work day requirements) established 
for other classes of employees included in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on September 24, 2005, as 
provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on 
September 24, 2005, members of this class of employees, defined as 
reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90dfd3d1c3d0d3d4d3bed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27686466746764636409606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 26, 2005.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-19673 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136582 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136582 

 COA: 283837 

Oakland CC: 2007-215377-FH 

MUHAMMAD ALIF, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
# Official Journal C 327/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 327 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 596 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 327

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 596 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 327/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2016/C 327/02 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 27 June 2016 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39850 — Container Shipping — Rapporteur: The Netherlands | 2 |
| 2016/C 327/03 | Final Report of the Hearing Officer — Container Shipping (AT.39850) | 3 |
| 2016/C 327/04 | Summary of Commission Decision of 7 July 2016 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39850 — Container Shipping) (notified under document C(2016) 4215) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 327/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2016/C 327/02

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 27 June 2016 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39850 — Container Shipping — Rapporteur: The Netherlands

2

2016/C 327/03

Final Report of the Hearing Officer — Container Shipping (AT.39850)

3

2016/C 327/04

Summary of Commission Decision of 7 July 2016 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39850 — Container Shipping) (notified under document C(2016) 4215)

(notified under document C(2016) 4215)

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 327/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8182 — PAI Partners/RP Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 327/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8182 — PAI Partners/RP Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Myron N. WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-2510.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 2003.

Myron N. Weaver, Caryville, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Myron Weaver timely appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant argues he is entitled to an additional 54 days credit for time served in jail on a warrant for violation of probation in case number 00-1283.

The trial court denied relief, concluding that he is not entitled to any additional credit, but the court did not attach any portions of the record to refute Appellant’s claim. Failure to provide record attachments refuting the movant’s claim is reversible error. *Collins v. State,*805 So.2d 73, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

We reverse and remand for the trial court to provide records that show Appel*609lant is not entitled to the requested relief, or to award additional credit.

STONE, STEVENSON, and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Christopher BUCKNER, Employee v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier

No. 211P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Christopher Buckner, for Buckner, Christopher.

Ms. Jennifer Jerzak Blackman, Attorney at Law, for United Parcel Service, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."