alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

 
 



 
 March 27, 2013 
 Chris J. Cahill 
 c/o Las Vegas Sands Corp. 

3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South 
 Las Vegas, NV
89109 
 Re:     Amendment to Employment Agreement 

Dear Chris: 
 Reference is
hereby made to that certain employment agreement between you and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (the “Company”), dated as of April 1, 2012 (as may be amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”). For valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, you and the Company hereby agree as follows, effective as of the date hereof: 
 1. The Employment Agreement is amended by deleting the language in Section 6.2(b) thereof and replacing it with a new Section 6.2(b) to read as follows: 

“An additional amount equal to 80% of Executive’s Base Salary then in effect, payable in installments during the Applicable
Period at the same time as the Salary Continuation payable under Section 6.2(a), subject to applicable withholdings.” 

The Company and you each acknowledges and agrees that except as amended hereby, the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect. This letter shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Nevada other than principles of law that would apply the law of another jurisdiction. This letter may be signed in any
number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Ira H. Raphaelson
	Name:	 	Ira H. Raphaelson
	Title:	 	EVP & Global General Counsel


 Agreed and accepted this          day of March 2013: 

 

	
	
	/s/ Chris J. Cahill
	CHRIS J. CAHILL

 Corporate Headquarters 
 3355 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 
 The Venetian | The Palazzo | Sands Expo |
Sands Bethlehem | Paiza | Sands Macao | The Venetian Macao 
 Four Seasons Hotel Macao | The Plaza Macao | Sands Cotai Central | Marina Bay Sands
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136929 & (26) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136929 

 COA: 284585 

Muskegon CC: 06-053640-FC

GLENN TERRANCE WILLIAMS, 06-053668-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is 

DENIED. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA-23-0265

SHAWNA L. JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner and Appellant, )

vs. )

)

MALACHI JOHNSON, )

Respondent and Appellee. )

)

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF

THE STATE OF MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY

Honorable Leslie Halligan, Presiding

_____________________________________________________________

WHEREAS, the Respondent/Appellee by and through counsel of record has 

filed an Unopposed Motion for a 30 day extension of time to file the Appellee’s 

response and good cause appearing therefrom:

IT IS ORDERED, the Appellee’s Motion is GRANTED and Appellee shall 

have an additional 30 (thirty) days from the prior Response Brief deadline to file 

the Appellee’s opening brief. 

08/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0265
STATE of North Carolina v. Demetric Shontel MCCRAY, Defendant.

No. COA16-1224

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

NO ERROR.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Sew Cal Logo, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending, a February 28, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Judy
      Songer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending February 28, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Sew Cal Logo, Inc.




Dated:
      April 12, 2007




**SEW
      CAL LOGO, INC.**


By:
            /s/
              Judy SongerChief
                Financial Officer,
Order entered March 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00842-CR

COURTLAND WAYNE KING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-59371-U

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 18, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to 

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel; 

(3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload and a recent 

illness; and (4) counsel requested fifteen additional days to complete the brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by APRIL 1, 2013. Because the brief is already 

three months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed by 

the date specified, we will order Jeff Buchwald removed as appellant’s attorney and order the 

trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission to the 

Honorable Susan Hawk, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00129-CV

NORMAN R. POTTER,

Appellant

v.

DANNY C. WASH,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-1574-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal was abated for mediation.

Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal stating that all matters in 

controversy between the parties have been mediated and settled and that Appellant no 

longer wishes to prosecute the appeal. Appellee does not oppose the motion.

Accordingly, this appeal is reinstated and dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Potter v. Wash Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 8, 2008

[CV06]
#### In the Matter of Michael Anthony SHORT.

No. 96 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 30, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 12, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Boschert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Clyvia Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert          
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT                    
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | September 22, 2008               





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.



---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Targeted Genetics
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd E.
Simpson, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

March 3, 2005                  /s/ TODD E. SIMPSON
---------------                -------------------------------------------------
Date                           Todd E. Simpson
                               Vice President, Finance and Administration,
                               Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DEL ROSA RUIZ

- CASTANEDA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND , Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 15

- 71065
Agency No. A200

- 877

- 792

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 30 , 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Maria Del Rosa Ruiz

- Castaneda , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from
an immigration judge’s decision denying her application s for asylum , withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 5 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 71065

of removal , protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) , and

cancellatio n of removal

. 1
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions
of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the

extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes
and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We
review for substantial evidence the agenc y’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Ruiz

- Castaneda
failed to establish she would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See

Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be
free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang

members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Ruiz

- Castaneda’s claim

for withholding of removal fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Ruiz

- Castaneda fai led to show it is more likely than not she will be

to rtured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to

1 Ruiz

- Castaneda does not challenge the agency’s denial of her asylum application as time

- barred or the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for failure to establish the requisite hardship.3 15

- 71065

Mexico

. See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) (stating

standard for CAT protection )

.
T he temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Motion Denied; Order filed April 2, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00665-CV

____________

DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-12988

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due January 8, 2015. We granted two

extensions of time to file appellant’s brief until March 26, 2015. No brief was filed. 

On March 25, 2015, appellant filed a further request for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief. We deny the request and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief with the clerk of this court on 

or before April 10, 2015. If appellant does not timely file the brief as ordered, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Cynthia FRANK, Employee v. CHARLOTTE SYMPHONY, Employer, and Selective Insurance Company of America, Carrier

No. 329P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Seth M. Bernanke, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Frank, Cynthia.

Garth H. White, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Alexander J. Rector, Attorney at Law, for Charlotte Symphony, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd of October 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136936 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136936 

 COA: 274238 

Jackson CC: 06-003338-FH 

ERIC CRENSHAW,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
----

(2004/C 88 E/0517)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0500/04

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Protecting the dignity of Arab women

The Saudi Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdul-Aziz al Sheij's recent condemnation of the country's most powerful businesswoman, Lubna Al Olayan, for daring to make a speech to a male audience, without wearing a veil, has caused a stir in the EU media.

Al Olayan, who was attending an economic forum, was warned by the Grand Mufti of the serious consequences which her outrageous behaviour could entail.

In a world as inter-related as ours, where ceaseless efforts are being made on behalf of securing the acknowledgement of women's basic human dignity, on an absolutely equal footing with males, what is the Commission's reaction to this condemnation by the Grand Mufti?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(23 March 2004)

The Commission shares the Honourable Member's views on the importance of securing basic women's human rights and, in particular, the principle of equality and no discrimination all over the world.

As the Honourable Member is well aware, the situation of women in Saudi Arabia is of a particular nature. As the specific case of Ms Lubna Al Olayan shows, there is an important domestic debate about women's rights and their role in society currently taking place in the country. Press reports have certainly contributed to increasing European awareness of the issue and constituting hence, a positive development. The Commission believes it is important to continue monitoring closely domestic debates and incipient reforms taking place in Saudi Arabia, and some other countries in the area, so as to keep encouraging the universality and indivisibility of human rights, and in particular, women's rights. The Commission will continue doing so through the Delegation it has just opened in Riyadh.

In addition, the Commission is currently negotiating a free trade agreement with the Gulf Co-operation countries (GCC) that will include a human rights clause as an essential element and as a basis to encourage governments to ensure the promotion and respect of human rights. Furthermore, human rights are an essential component of the EU-GCC political dialogue, both at Ministerial and at Directors level. Within this context, EU concerns on the specific situation of women in the area have continually been raised. The Commission will not hesitate to raise this issue again at future occasions.

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00341

- CV
In the Interest of H.C., a child

On a ppeal from the County Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 08

- 7083

- FL

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 23, 2 014.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52005AP0165

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC (12884/1/2004 - C6-0006/2005 - 2002/0254(COD))***Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0064 - 0079*

P6_TA(2005)0165

Quality of bathing water ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC (12884/1/2004 — C6-0006/2005 — 2002/0254(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,,

- having regard to the Council common position (12884/1/2004 — C6-0006/2005),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2002)0581) [2],

- having regard to the amended proposal (COM(2004)0245) [3],

- having regard to Article 251 (2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0102/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 82 E, 1.4.2004, p. 115.

[2] OJ C 45 E, 25.2.2003, p. 127.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
----

            COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION         

of 8 March 2005         

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) for the financial year 2003

(2005/255/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Fourth ACP-EC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989, as amended by the Agreement signed at Mauritius on 4 November 1995,

Having regard to Internal Agreement 91/401/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid under the fourth ACP-EEC Convention (1), setting up, amongst others, the Seventh European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 29 July 1991 applicable to development finance cooperation under the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention (2), and in particular Articles 69 to 77 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the Seventh EDF as at 31 December 2003 and the Court of Auditors’ Report concerning the financial year 2003 together with the Commission’s replies (3),

Whereas:

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Seventh EDF for the financial year 2003.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER            

----

(1)OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 288.

(2)OJ L 266, 21.9.1991, p. 1.

(3)OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p. 315.

----