alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
S. Hiltwein, the Chief Financial Officer of Cenveo, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’),
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 3,
2009 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March
      19, 2009
                  /S/ MARK S.
      HILTWEINMark S. Hiltwein
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
Paula MARTIN, Widow, and Brandon Martin, Minor Child (By and Through His Guardian ad Litem Paula Martin), of William D. Martin, Deceased Employee, Plaintiffs, v. ORANGE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Employer, NCIRMA, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA17-242

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED.
Twelve months ended
                                                 March 31,
                                      1999         1999         1998
                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
Net income as reported . . . . .   $4,700,000   $3,930,000   $3,189,000
                                   ==========   ==========   ==========


BASIC:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding.    4,812,610    4,868,376    4,841,775
                                   ==========   ==========   ==========
  Basic earnings per share. . .         $0.98        $0.81        $0.66
                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

DILUTED:
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding.    4,812,610    4,868,376    4,841,775
    Common stock equivalents
      from options computed on
      the treasury-stock method
      using the average fair
      market value of common
      stock during the period. .      307,637      169,304      242,406
                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
    Shares used in the
      computation. . . . . . . .    5,120,247    5,037,680    5,084,181
                                   ==========   ==========   ==========


 Diluted earnings per share. . .        $0.92        $0.78        $0.63
                                   ==========   ==========   ==========
#### Johnny RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 3D02-2119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 3, 2003.

Bennett Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Marni A. Bryson (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

SHEVIN, Judge.

We grant defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus asserting that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the predicate offenses relied on by the state to sentence defendant as a violent career criminal. A review of the record reveals, and the state properly concedes, that defendant’s sentence is illegal as defendant does not qualify for sentencing as a violent career criminal pursuant to section 775.084(d), Florida Statutes (1999). We therefore vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing according to the laws in effect at the time defendant’s crime was committed.

Sentence vacated and cause remanded.
# C_2011269EN.01004402.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — General Technic-Otis and Others v Commission

(Cases T-141/07, T-142/07, T-145/07 and T-146/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for the installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Bid-rigging - Market sharing - Price fixing)

2011/C 269/97

Languages of the case: French and English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: General Technic-Otis Sàrl (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented initially by M. Nosbusch and subsequently by A. Winckler, lawyers, and J. Temple Lang, Solicitor) (Case T-141/07); General Technic Sàrl (Howald) (represented by: M. Nosbusch) (Case T-142/07); Otis SA (Dilbeek, Belgium), Otis GmbH & Co. OHG, (Berlin, Germany), Otis BV (Amersfoort, Netherlands), and Otis Elevator Company (Farmington, Connecticut, United States) (represented by: A. Winckler and J. Temple Lang) (Case T-145/07); and United Technologies Corporation (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: A. Winckler and J. Temple Lang) (Case T-146/07)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented in Cases T-141/07 and T-142/07, by A. Bouquet and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Condomines, lawyer, and, in Cases T-145/07 and T-146/07, by A. Bouquet, R. Sauer and J. Bourke, acting as Agents, and by A. Condomines)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Applications for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 512 final of 21 February 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/E 1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators) or, in the alternative, reduction of the amounts of the fines imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-141/07, T-142/07, T-145/07 and T-146/07 for the purposes of this judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-141/07, T-142/07, T-145/07 and T-146/07 for the purposes of this judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | In Case T-141/07, orders General Technic-Otis Sàrl to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Case T-141/07, orders General Technic-Otis Sàrl to pay the costs;

| 4. | In Case T-142/07, orders General Technic Sàrl to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

In Case T-142/07, orders General Technic Sàrl to pay the costs;

| 5. | In Case T-145/07, orders Otis SA, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG, Otis BV and Otis Elevator Company to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

5.

In Case T-145/07, orders Otis SA, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG, Otis BV and Otis Elevator Company to pay the costs;

| 6. | In Case T-146/07, orders United Technologies Corporation to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

6.

In Case T-146/07, orders United Technologies Corporation to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5165] 

A meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law will take place on Thursday, September 29, 2005, from 10 a.m. to approximately 4 p.m., as necessary, in Room 1207 of the United States Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will be chaired by the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, John B. Bellinger, III, and will be open to the public up to the capacity of the meeting room. The meeting will discuss various issues relating to current international legal topics, including Presidential determinations to comply with International Court of Justice decisions: Avena and domestic litigation; the recent session of the International Law Commission; recent developments on prisoners and detainees, and recent developments on treaties. 

                    Entry to the building is controlled and will be facilitated by advance arrangements. Members of the public desiring access to the session should, by Tuesday, September 27, 2005, notify the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs (telephone: 202-647-2767) of their name, date of birth; citizenship (country); ID number.,                     *i.e.*, U.S. government ID (agency), U.S. military ID (branch), passport (country), or drivers license (state); professional affiliation, address and telephone number in order to arrange admittance. This includes admittance for government employees as well as others. All attendees must use the “C” Street entrance. One of the following valid IDs will be required for admittance: any U.S. driver's license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. Government agency ID. Because an escort is required at all times, attendees should expect to remain in the meeting for the entire morning or afternoon session.                 

Dated: September 9, 2005. 

Judith L. Osborn, 

Attorney-Adviser,  Office of United Nations Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser,  Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law,  Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-18354 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 

25, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00041-CV

DENBURY RESOURCES, INC. AND DENBURY ONSHORE, LLC, 

Appellants

V.

GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-10397

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 5, 2014. On August 19, 

2016, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.
**Consent
      of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm**











Board
      of
      Directors


BroadVision,
      Inc.








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form S-8 (Nos. 333-109709, 333-97521, 333-63798, 333-35114, 333-62619,
      333-14057) of BroadVision, Inc. the use of our report of Independent
      Registered Public Accounting Firm dated May 26, 2006, on the consolidated
      balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements
      of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss),
      and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the Annual Report on
      Form
      10-K.





We
      also
      consent to the reference to us as experts in matters of accounting and auditing
      in the registration statements and prospectus.














/s/
      Stonefield Josephson, Inc.








Irvine,
      California


March
      23,
      2007
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7563** 

BENJAMIN A. SIFRIT , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General of the State of Maryland , Respondents

– Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 02327

- RDB )

Submitted : June 28, 2011 Decided: July 8, 2011

Before WI LK INSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Benjamin A. Sifrit, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel lees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin A. Sifrit seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the dist rict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2 000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable cla im of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sifrit has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , de ny Sifrit’s request for appoint ment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSE D
#### STATE ex rel. Bryan WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-1938.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Williams, Bryan; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 402,207; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99 KA 1419.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000921112
<NAME> LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          55,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,603
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,596
<PP&E>                                       2,101,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,094,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,504
<BONDS>                                        960,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    120,814
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                     834,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,094,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
km

NOV 1 8 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

C1,_,A of Supreme Court 

State of tVlontana 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

HELENA, MONTANA 59620-3003 

Supreme Court No. 

DA 22-0497 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

THOMAS RONALD KNUDSON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT OF EXTENSION 

Pursuant to authority granted under M. R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension of time 

until December 19, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's brief. 

DATED this November 18, 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of the Supreme Court 

c: Thomas Ronald Knudson, Austin Miles Knudsen, Stephen A. Gannon 

PO BOX 203003 • HELENA MT • 59620-3003 • TELEPHONE: (406) 444-3858 • FAX: (406) 444-5705 

11/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0497
Steven HARRIS, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent

No. 110A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 22, 2017

Law Offices of Michael C. Byrne, by Michael C. Byrne, for petitioner-appellee.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Tamika L. Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, and Ryan Park, Deputy Solicitor General, for respondent-appellant.

Essex Richards, P.A., Charlotte, by Norris A. Adams, II, for North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police, and Blanchard, Miller, Lewis & Isley, P.A., Raleigh, by E. Hardy Lewis, *143for North Carolina State Employees Association, amici curiae.

The McGuinness Law Firm, Elizabethtown, by J. Michael McGuinness, and Milliken Law, by Megan A. Milliken, for North Carolina Police Benevolent Association and Southern States Police Benevolent Association, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
NO. 07-09-0278-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 22, 2010

______________________________

EX PARTE JAMES G. MILLER 

_________________________________

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2009547,036; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**DISSENTING OPINION**

****I join the majority in finding that the trial court had jurisdiction to hear this matter; however, I write separately to dissent from the majority's finding that the trial court did not erroneously dismiss this case.  A statutory expunction proceeding is civil rather than criminal in nature.  *Collin County Criminal District Attorney's Office v. Dobson,*167 S.W.3d 625 (Tex.App.--Dallas 2005, no pet.).  On July 15, 2009, the trial court scheduled this matter for a hearing.  Twelve days later, on July 27th, 2009, the trial court summarily entered an order of dismissal.  A trial court erroneously dismisses a civil proceeding when it dismisses a proceeding without appropriate due process.  Because Appellant was not afforded the opportunity of a hearing or the procedural benefits of a summary judgment proceeding, I would reverse the order of the trial court and remand for further proceedings. 

							  Patrick A. Pirtle											        Justice

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Derek
Bertocci, Chief Financial Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                       
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Derek Bertocci                    
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Derek Bertocci Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**EXCHANGE      ACT RULE 15d-14(b) AND**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|  | i. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | ii. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | /s/                  BRADLEY                  M. COLBY |
|   | Bradley                      M. Colby*President,                    Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,**Secretary                    and Chief Financial Officer**Eternal                        Energy Corp.*May                        15,                        2006 |

----
Exhibit 10.23 - MJB amendment






Exhibit 10.23




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Reference is made to the employment agreement between Mark J. Barrenechea and Open Text Corporation dated as of October 30, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”).  Defined terms used herein are as defined in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise stated.


Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide that on the third anniversary of the Effective Date, the Term shall be extended for an additional three-year period, and shall be extended automatically thereafter for an additional one-year period unless either party provides the other party with notice of non-renewal at least three (3) months before any such anniversary, or the parties otherwise agree.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have executed this Amendment No. 2 to the Employment Agreement as of the 30th day of July, 2014.




Open Text Corporation    Mark J. Barrenechea






/s/Gordon A. Davies                       /s/Mark J. Barrenechea         
Name:  Gordon A. Davies
Title:    Chief Legal Officer and
Corporate Secretary