alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



SEPARATION AGREEMENT
AND
GENERAL RELEASE
   RECITALS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
  Page 1 of 9




---



##### 



I.
    
    Separation of Employment
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 II.
    
    Special Compensation and Benefits
 A.
 B.
 C.
 Page 2 of 9




---



##### 



III.
    
    Mutual Release
  A.
 B.
 Page 3 of 9




---



##### 



C.
   Page 4 of 9




---



##### 



D.
 IV.
    
    Restrictive Covenants and Miscellaneous Provisions
 A.
 B.
 Confidential Information
 Page 5 of 9




---



##### 



Non-Compete
 Non-Solicitation
 Enforcement
 Reformation
 Page 6 of 9




---



##### 



C.
 D.
 E.
 F.
 G.
 H.
 I.
 Page 7 of 9




---



##### 



J.
 K.
  Page 8 of 9




---



##### 



George M. Daly
    
    
    
    Date
  By:Name:Title:Date:
 Page 9 of 9
# C_2022294EN.01000101.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 294/01)

Last publication

OJ C 284, 25.7.2022

Past publications

OJ C 276, 18.7.2022

OJ C 266, 11.7.2022

OJ C 257, 4.7.2022

OJ C 244, 27.6.2022

OJ C 237, 20.6.2022

OJ C 222, 7.6.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BEIJING MED-PHARM CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating
to the registrant, including
its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this
report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting that
occurred during the
registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of
internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ FRED M. POWELLFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
 23
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4070 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating certain 

network management practices of broadband Internet access service providers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2014 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. CRAMER, 

Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. LATTA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from 

regulating certain network management practices of 

broadband Internet access service providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Freedom 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF FCC. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The regulations adopted by the 

8 Federal Communications Commission in the Report and 

9 Order in the matter of preserving the open Internet and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4070 IH

1 broadband industry practices (FCC 10–201; adopted De2 cember 21, 2010) shall have no force or effect, and the 

3 Commission may not reissue such regulations in substan4 tially the same form, or issue new regulations that are 

5 substantially the same as such regulations, unless the re6 issued or new regulations are specifically authorized by a 

7 law enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—This section does not apply to any 

9 regulations that the Federal Communications Commission 

10 determines necessary— 

11 (1) to prevent damage to the national security 

12 of the United States; 

13 (2) to ensure the public safety; or 

14 (3) to assist or facilitate any actions taken by 

15 a Federal or State law enforcement agency. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATIONPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pehong Chen, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of BroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 9th day ofJune, 2006.   /s/ Pehong Chen Pehong Chen  ChiefExecutive Officer and
# C_2009006EN.01002802.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2008 — EOS v OHIM (PrimeCast)

(Case T-373/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark PrimeCast - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems (Krailling, Germany) (represented by: M. Mentjes, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and G. Schneider, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 July 2007 (Case R 333/2005-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark PrimeCast as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | orders EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Kenneth J. ROE, Respondent.

No. 461 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 30, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 23, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that KENNETH J. ROE be and he is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated April 13, 2001, included in this
Form 10-K, into Learn2.com Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements File No. 333-34350, 333-64365, 333-69861, 333-80357 and
333-90983 filed on Form S-3 and Registration Statements File No. 333-83695, 333-65525, 333-10341, 333-10339 and
333-92697 filed on Form S-8.



New York, New York
April 13, 2001

---

QuickLinks
#### Kenneth G. GEARHART, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D03-2287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2003.

Robert Augustus Harper and Michael Robert Ufferman of the Robert Augustus Harper Law Firm, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

*288WOLF, C.J., and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

BENTON, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of
the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) by American Eagle Energy Corporation (“Registrant”),
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ BRADLEY M. COLBY                              | 
|------------------------------------------------- | 
|Bradley M. Colby                                  | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer | 



Date: August 20, 2012



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 has been provided to American Eagle Energy Corporation and will be retained by American Eagle Energy Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued March 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00524-CV

———————————

FREDDIE LEE WALKER, Appellant

V.

DAVID GUTIERREZ, CHAIRMAN OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF 

PARDONS AND PAROLES; ROY A. (TONY) GARCIA, COMMISSIONER; 

WANDA SALIAGAS, COMMISSIONER; AND FEDERICO RANGEL, 

BOARD MEMBER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 200th District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. D-1-GN-17-001513

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellees’ motion to dismiss, 

signed June 15, 2017. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant’s brief was originally due in August 2017. In October, the court 
2

issued an order denying appellant’s motion concerning production of records under 

Rule 196, and we forwarded appellant a copy of the record. We set the brief due on 

November 13, 2017. No brief was filed. After being notified that this appeal was 

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond and has not filed a brief 

or sought an extension of time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Steven L.
Basta, Chief Executive Officer of BioForm Medical, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven L. Basta
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Steven L. Basta        
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Valley Financial Corporation,
certify that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).

Dated: March 15, 2007



/s/ Kimberly B. SnyderChief Financial Officer




122
Three months ended     Twelve months ended
                                        March 31,              March 31,     
                                    1998        1997       1998       1997   
                                 ---------   ---------  ---------- ----------
Net income as reported . . . . .  $775,000    $640,000  $3,189,000 $2,485,000
                                 =========   =========  ========== ==========
                                  

BASIC:
    Weighted average number of 
      common shares outstanding. 3,260,585   3,161,359   3,227,850  3,120,433
                                 =========   =========  ========== ==========
  Basic earnings per share. . .      $0.24       $0.20       $0.99      $0.80
                                 =========   =========  ========== ==========

DILUTED: 
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of 
      common shares outstanding. 3,260,585   3,161,359   3,227,850  3,120,433
    Common stock equivalents 
      from options computed on 
      the treasury-stock method 
      using the average fair 
      market value of common 
      stock during the period. .   154,723     162,175     161,604    158,902
                                 ---------   ---------  ---------- ----------
    Shares used in the 
      computation. . . . . . . . 3,415,308   3,323,534   3,389,454  3,279,335
                                 =========   =========  ========== ==========


 Diluted earnings per share. . .     $0.23       $0.19       $0.94      $0.76
                                 =========   =========  ========== ==========
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/30

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 30.Declaration on the ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0464 - 0464*

30. Declaration on the ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe

The Conference notes that if, two years after the signature of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, four fifths of the Member States have ratified it and one or more Member States have encountered difficulties in proceeding with ratification, the matter will be referred to the European Council.

--------------------------------------------------
#### State of MONTANA, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaimant.

No. CV-83-317-H-SEH.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Helena Division.

July 25, 2003.

ORDER

HADDON, District Judge.

On May 13, 2003, the Court dismissed, with prejudice, the State of Montana’s claim for restoration cost damages at the Upland Areas. Montana has moved the Court, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), to enter a final judgment on the dismissed claim to permit immediate appeal.

Rule 54(b) certification is proper only if it aids in the expeditious resolution of the case while avoiding piecemeal appeals. *Core-Vent Corp. v. Nobel Indus. AB,*11 F.3d 1482, 1484 (9th Cir.1993). The moving party must demonstrate that certification is appropriate. *Braswell Shipyards, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.,*2 F.3d 1331, 1335 (4th Cir.1993); *Anthuis v. Colt Indust. Operating Corp.,*971 F.2d 999, 1003 (3d Cir.1992). The decision to grant a Rule 54(b) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. *Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Elec. Co.,*446 U.S. 1, 8, 100 S.Ct. 1460, 64 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980).

The arguments advanced by Montana do not persuade the Court that a Rule 54(b) certification would aid or facilitate expeditious resolution of this case.

ORDERED:

*1160Montana’s Rule 54(b) motion is DENIED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT CALVIN DEJUAN FORMAN,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-4028 September 15, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pamela A.M. Campbell, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Order filed September 26, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00100-CR

____________

ORLANDO DEWAN GODFREY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1343252

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the originals of State’s Exhibit 1 and 

State’s Exhibit 1A, DVDs.
2

The clerk of the 182nd District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of 

this court the originals of State’s Exhibit 1 and State’s Exhibit 1A, DVDs, on or 

before October 11, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, 

and keep safe these original exhibits; to deliver them to the justices of this court for 

their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the originals of these 

exhibits to the clerk of the 182nd District Court.

PER CURIAM
STATE of North Carolina v. Kevin Salvador GOLPHIN

No. 114P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2017

Mr. Kevin Salvado Golphin, for Golphin, Kevin Salvador.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

Mr. Thomas Maher, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Mr. Glenn G. Gerding, Appellate Defender.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of April 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed without prejudice to Defendant's right to seek appropriate relief in the trial court. By order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of November 2017."
Exhibit 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-38878, 333-12117, 333-29759 and 333-55901 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), dated March 2, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in its method of accounting for share-based payments, effective January 1, 2006, to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, and the Company’s change in its method of accounting for joint ventures, effective January 1, 2006, to conform to Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners HaveCertain Rights) and our report relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highwoods Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 2, 2008
Ronnie Edward MOORE, Plaintiff, v. Priscilla Ann MCKENZIE individually, and Priscilla Ann McKenzie, as Executor of the Estate of Bobby Jenkins Byrd, Defendants.

No. COA17-53

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

Ronnie Edward Moore ("Plaintiff") appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of Priscilla Ann McKenzie ("Defendant"). Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by concluding that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiff's mother and stepfather entered into a mutual will. After careful review, we affirm the trial court's order.

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Dwain BELL

129P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Dwain Bell, For Bell, Dwain.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of May 2016 by Petitioner for Objection to Order of Bill of Complaint Dismissed:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
Exhibit 21.0  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  Parent  TF
Financial Corporation  Subsidiaries
  
  Percentage
  Owned
  
  Jurisdiction of
  IncorporationThird
  Federal Bank(a)
  
  100
  %
  United
  StatesTF
  Investments Corporation(a)
  
  100
  %
  DelawareTeragon
  Financial Corporation(a)(b)
  
  100
  %
  PennsylvaniaPenns
  Trail Development Corporation(a)
  
  100
  %
  DelawareThird
  Delaware Corporation(a)(b)
  
  100
  %
  Delaware  
 (a)The
operations of this subsidiary are included in the consolidated financial statements
contained in the 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders incorporated herein by
reference.  (b)Third
Delaware Corporation and Teragon Financial Corporation are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Third Federal Bank.