alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

| a.   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                        |  /s/                  Steven                  Steinberg                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  November                  7th,                  2005 | Steven                  Steinberg Chief                  Financial Officer(Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                |

.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6258

LAMAR CANNADY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY WRIGHT; CALEB EDWARDS; SBI SPECIAL AGENT LEON; POLK 

COUNTY DETENTION OFFICER CASE; DISTRICT ATTORNEY BETH; 

UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF OF COUNTY JAIL; CORPORAL SILVA; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BYRD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DRYMER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00163-MR)

Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamar Cannady, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6258 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lamar Cannady appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his amended

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cannady v. Polk Cnty. Jail,

No. 1:22-cv-00163-MR (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6258 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7311
THEBOYETTE JEFFERIES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM H. ANDREWS; CHARLIE MCCULLEN, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-978) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theboyette Jefferies, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jefferies v. Andrews , No. CA-97-978 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JUVENAL TAB O ADA-B A HENA,

Pe t i tione r,
v. W ILLIAM P. B ARR , Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 16-70490 Age n c y No. A200-198-476
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 12, 2019 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : GR

AB E R , B ER

ZON, a nd C HR ISTEN, C i rc uit Judge s. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w disc re tiona ry de nia ls of c anc e l lation of
re m ova l a nd volunta

ry de p arture . 8 U.S.C . §§ 1252(a)(2)(B )(i), 1229b, 1229c . W e do ha ve jurisdic t ion to re vie w “ c olora ble ” le g a l and c onstitutiona l c la im s, whic h 

# FIL ED N OV 20 2019 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).we re vie w denov o . Martine z-Rosas v . Gonzale

s , 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th C i r. 2005); 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a)(2)(D). He re , Ta boa da -B ahe n a

inc orre c tly

argue s tha

t the Im m igration Judge(“ IJ” )
and the B oa

rd did not deny

his re que ste d re lie f a s a

n e xe rc ise of disc re tion. To the
e xte nt tha t Ta boa d a -B a he na ra ise s due proc e ss c ha lle nge s to the a dm ission of theI213's a n d his ina bility to c ross-e xam ine the pre pa re rs of thoseform s, his a

rgum e nts fa il. He ra ise d no obje c tion to the form s whe n the y

we re a dm itte d by

the IJ, a nd he ha s not ove rc om e the pre sum ption tha t the form s we re re lia

ble
. Espinoza v . IN

S , 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th C ir. 1995). As the re are no c ogniz a

ble le ga l or c onstitutiona

l c la im s, we la c k jurisdic tion ove r the disc re tiona ry de nia l of re lie f, whic h is indepe nde ntly dispositive . W e the re fore do not re a c h the que stion whe t he r Ta boa da -B ahe na

wa s disqua lifie d. DISM I SSE D
.

2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 1, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133274 & (42)(45) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DENNIS G. SIMPSON, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 133274 

 COA: 264106 
 WCAC: 04-000017 

BORBOLLA CONSTRUCTION & CONCRETE 

SUPPLY, INC. and CINCINNATI INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

DefendantsAppellants, 

and 

FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL,

INC. and TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY 

COMPANY, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

SILICOSIS DUST DISEASE & LOGGING 

INDUSTRY COMPENSATION FUND, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court 

of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to 

grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral 

argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that 

Rakestraw v General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc, 469 Mich 220 (2003), does not apply 

where the preexisting condition is work-related. The parties may file supplemental briefs 

within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of 

their application papers. 

t0529 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 1, 2007 

Clerk 
2
NC Department of Public Safety v. Ledford

223PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2016

Mr. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, For North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

Mr. Larry Leake, Attorney at Law, For Ledford, Chauncey John.

Ms. Jamie A. Stokes, Attorney at Law.

Mr. J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, For Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

Mr. Michael C. Byrne, Mr. Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorneys at Law, For State Employees Association of North Carolina and North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of December 2016 by Southern States Police Benevolent Association and the North Carolina Police Benevolent Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive and Financial Officer

I, Sergei Stetsenko, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report ofPeloton Resources Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: January 5, 2005. | /s/ Sergei Stetsenko                                       
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Sergei Stetsenko                                           
|                       | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
----

Action brought on 31 January 2006 — Larsen v Commission

(Case F-11/06)

(2006/C 74/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Holger Larsen (London, United Kingdom) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an official assigned to the Commission Representation Office in London, received from 1 October 2002 a rent allowance under Article 14a of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations and Regulation No 6/66/Euratom and No 121/66/EEC (1). That article was repealed when the Staff Regulations were reformed and so the Commission, by decision of 2 May 2005, withdrew that allowance from the applicant.

In support of his action, the applicant first alleges the infringement of Article 62 of the Staff Regulations and Article 19 of Annex XIII thereto. He points out, in particular, that the defendant was wrong to apply the latter article in accordance with the interpretation adopted by the Heads of Administration on 14 October 2004, which excludes the rent allowance from the remuneration covered by the transitional measures laid down in that article. Such an interpretation is unlawful, inasmuch as it reduces the scope of the net income guarantee referred to by the provision in question.

In addition, the applicant contends that the contested decision infringes the principle of the equivalent purchasing power of officials, as prescribed by Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations.

----

(1)  Regulation No 6/66/Euratom, 121/66/EEC of the Councils of 28 July 1966 laying down the list of places for which a rent allowance may be granted, the maximum amount of that allowance and the rules for granting it, OJ, English Special Edition 1965-6 (1), p. 212.

----
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Retired Members of NC Judiciary.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by Retired Members of the North Carolina Judiciary for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
STATE v. Bobby JOHNSON

57PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2017

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Johnson, Bobby.

Alvin William Keller, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 30th of June 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of June 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 4th day of August 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# Official Journal L 339/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.339.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 339 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5512 December 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.339.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 339

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5512 December 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2012 of 27 November 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2012 of 27 November 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Jacqueline LITTLE, et al. v. Dr. David G. POU, et al.

No. 2003-CC-0623.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Chnstus Health Northern Louisiana d/b/a; Christus Schumpert Health System; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. M084-02002; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 87197-CW.

Remand to the trial court for reconsideration in light of *Perritt v. Dona,*02-CC-2061 c/w 02-CC-2603 (La.7/2/03), 849 So.2d 56.
CHRISTOPHER v. COBBLESTONE HOA OF CLAYTON, INC.

375A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 2016

J. Matthew Waters, Attorney at Law, Hope Derby Carmichael, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Cobblestone Homeowners Association of Clayton, Inc.

Robert A. Spence, Jr., Attorney at Law, Smithfield, For Christopher, Frank.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendant to Consolidate Appeals:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of October 2016."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Network Reliability and Interoperability Council

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 
this notice advises interested persons of the fifth meeting of the 
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council (Council) under its 
charter renewed as of December 29, 2003. The meeting will be held at 
the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, DC.

DATES: Wednesday October 19, 2005 beginning at 2 p.m. and concluding at 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St., SW., Room 
TW-305, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffery Goldthorp, the Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO) at (202) 418-1096 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc96b9babab9aea5f29bb3b0b8a8b4b3aeac9cbabfbff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="246e41424241565d0a634b4840504c4b5654644247470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. 
The TTY number is: (202) 418-2989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Council is to provide 
recommendations to the FCC and to the communications industry that, if 
implemented, shall under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances 
assure optimal reliability and interoperability of wireless, wireline, 
satellite, cable, and public data networks. At this fifth meeting under 
the Council's new charter, the Council will discuss potential 
recommendations in the areas of E911 implementation and evolution, 
network security, network reliability, and broadband. The Council will 
also review the status of various working groups.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting. The Federal 
Communications Commission will attempt to accommodate as many people as 
possible. Admittance, however, will be limited to the seating 
available. The public may submit written comments before the meeting to 
Jeffery Goldthorp, the Commission's Designated Federal Officer for the 
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council, by e-mail 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cd6f9fafaf9eee5b2dbf3f0f8e8f4f3eeecdcfaffffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ed4fbf8f8fbece7b0d9f1f2faeaf6f1eceedef8fdfdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>) or U.S. Postal Service mail (7-A325, 445 
12th St., SW., Washington, DC 20554). Real Audio and streaming video 
access to the meeting will be available at http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19516 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Julian Andres VALDIVIESO v. Donnie HARRISON

No. 7P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 2018

Julian Andres Valdivieso, for Valdivieso, Julian Andres.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 8th of January 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the *442following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of January 2018."
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: May 7, 2008/S/ MICHAEL J. SOENENName:
    
    Michael J. SoenenTitle:
    
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President/S/ BECKY A. SHEEHANName:
    
    Becky A. SheehanTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DSA Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Edward L. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Edward L. Fischer
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Edward L. Fischer
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DSA Financial Corporation and will be retained by DSA Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
In the Matter of: T.J.T.

No. COA16-576

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.