alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Deon Quintin MCDONALD

No. 378P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for McDonald, Deon Quintin.

Alvin William Keller, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th of November 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of November 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*872"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
In the MATTER OF: A.L.M., A.L.M.

No. COA17-547

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
Annah AWARTANI; Gilma Varinia Bonilla; Crystal Kim Parker, individually and for others similarly situated v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION

No. 426P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Mr. Robert J. King, III, Attorney at Law, For Awartani, Annah, et al.

Mr. Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, For Awartani, Annah, et al.

Ms. Elizabeth Troutman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Awartani, Annah, et al.

Ms. Maureen D. Murray, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation.

Mr. Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation.

*866***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 13th of December 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of December 2017 by Plaintiffs Requesting Court Exercise Its Supervisory Authority:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FALLON RAHIMA JALLALI , Appellant,

v.

CHRISTIANA TRUST , a division of WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, as Trustee for NORMANDY MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,

SERIES 2013

- 15
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3311

[ September 6 , 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 07

- 010279 (12)

.

Alan M. Medof, Boca Raton and Cyrus A. Bischoff, Miami, for appellant.

Melissa A . Giasi of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER
, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 333-109189, 333-99399, 333-82592, 333-45643, 333-86697, 333-86719, and333-20387 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2005, relatingto the financial statements of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metro One Telecommunications,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|---------------------------|
| Portland, Oregon          |
| March 16, 2005            |

 

----
David STAMEY, Plaintiff, v. Heather STAMEY, Defendant.

No. COA16-843

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

VACATED AND REMANDED; REVERSED.
# Official Journal L 217I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 217I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6127 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 217I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6127 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1204 of 27 August 2018 amending for the 290th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1204 of 27 August 2018 amending for the 290th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 144/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 144 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5110 June 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 144

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5110 June 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2008/C 144/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2008/C 144/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF
BASIC EARNINGS AND DILUTED
EARNINGS PER SHARE



YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,                      2004          2003          2002
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
Net income from continuing operations $ 4,753,000   $ 4,063,000   $ 4,403,000
Discontinued operations:
 Loss from discontinued operations           -             -         (271,000)
 Estimated gain (loss) on disposal           -          745,000    (3,256,000)
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
Net income                            $ 4,753,000   $ 4,808,000   $   876,000
                                      ===========   ===========   ===========

BASIC:
  Weighted average number of
   common shares basic                  4,157,081     4,501,342     5,071,125
Basic earnings per share from
  continuing operations                     $1.14         $0.90         $0.86
Basic loss per share from
  discontinued operations                     -             -           (0.05)
Basic gain (loss) per share on
  disposal of discontinued operations         -            0.17         (0.64)
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
Basic earnings per share                    $1.14         $1.07         $0.17
                                      ===========   ===========   ===========


DILUTED:
 Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:

   Weighted average number of common
    shares basic                        4,157,081     4,501,342     5,071,125
   Common stock equivalents from
    options computed utilizing the
    treasury-stock method based on the
    average fair market value of common
    stock during the period               207,602       210,078       137,799
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares   diluted    4,364,683     4,711,420     5,208,924

Diluted earnings per share from
  continuing operations                     $1.09         $0.86         $0.85
Diluted loss per share from
  discontinued operations                     -             -           (0.05)
Diluted gain (loss) per share on
  disposal of discontinued operations         -            0.16         (0.63)
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
Diluted earnings per share                  $1.09         $1.02         $0.17
                                      ===========   ===========   ===========
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                   |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                      |  |  |  | Name: Curtis W. Mewbourne        
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer   
|                      |  |  |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00132-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.J.L., a Child

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-02-27955-CV

The Honorable Cathy O. Morris, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2012

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Appellant M.V.1 appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parent-child relationship 

with her daughter M.J.L. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to 

withdraw and a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating there are 

no arguable grounds to be advanced and concluding the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-

CV, 2003 WL 21157944, *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders

procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 

22080522 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Appellant was 

 1 To protect the identity of the minor child, we refer to the mother and child by their initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE 

ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2011); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8.
04-12-00132-CV

- 2 -

provided a copy of the brief and informed of her right to review the record and file her own brief. 

See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, July 23, 1997, no pet.); In 

re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. In response, appellant filed a pro se letter brief, which 

primarily complains about her inability to file a full brief on the merits due to her “rudimentary 

command” of the English language. She also generally asserts her desire to be reunited with her 

daughter once she is released from incarceration. 

When an Anders brief and a subsequent pro se brief are filed, the court has two options.

In re Guardianship of Hahn, 276 S.W.3d 515, 518 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, no pet.). 

Upon reviewing the entire record, we may determine: (1) the appeal is without merit and issue an 

opinion explaining that there is no reversible error, or (2) there are arguable grounds for appeal 

and remand the cause to the trial court for appointment of new appellate counsel. Id.; see

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals 

may address merits of issues raised by pro se only after any arguable grounds have been briefed 

by new counsel). Here, we have carefully reviewed the entire appellate record, and with great 

deference to appellant’s language skills, we conclude there are no arguable grounds for appeal, 

there is no reversible error, and the appeal is without merit. See id. Specifically, we hold there 

are no meritorious issues that might be raised, even if appellant were provided an interpreter on 

appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order. 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp. (the Company) for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Stephen R. Kerrigan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that based on my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
February 14, 2005
    
    /s/ Stephen R. Kerrigan_Stephen R. KerriganChief Executive OfficerCoinmach Service Corp.
#### James S. SIEGENTHALER, Appellant, v. Leslie SIEGENTHALER, n/k/a Dealy, Respondent.

No. ED 82165.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Prudence Fink Johnson, Union, MO, for appellant.

P. Daniel Billington, Union, MO, for respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J„ GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James S. Siegenthaler (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment declaring that his pension was to be divided with Respondent Leslie Siegen-thaler, n/k/a Dealy (‘Wife”), under a pro rata formula. In his only point on appeal, Husband argues the trial court erred in holding that the 1987 decree, which granted Wife fifty percent of his vested account balance under the Federal Employees Pension Plan as of September 24, 1987, meant that Wife was entitled to a pro rata portion of Husband’s entire pension earned between 1967 and 2002.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10979

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jacob Josiah Mitchell-Bowlds, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-147-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Willett, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jacob Josiah 

Mitchell-Bowlds has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mitchell-Bowlds has filed a response. 

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10979 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
No. 23-10979

2

of Mitchell-Bowlds’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore 

decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See 

United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Mitchell-Bowlds’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10979 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Rosa Serrano,

 Appellant,

v.

Pellicano Business Park LLC,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-15-00290-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-DCV06341)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter=s request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter=s Record until February 29, 2015. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER=S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Leticia Dittmar, Court Reporter for the County Court at Law 

No. 7, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter=s Record for the above styled and 

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before February 29, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.

(Hughes, J., not participating)
# Official Journal C 171/12 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 171 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6612 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 171

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6612 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 171/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.63846 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 171/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104980 (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2023/C 171/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.106016 (
  1
  ) | 4 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 171/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.63846 (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 171/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104980 (
  1
  )

1

3

2023/C 171/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.106016 (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE v. Robert A.D. WALDRUP

189P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Robert A.D. Waldrup, For Waldrup, Robert A.D.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of December 2017 by Defendant for an Evidentiary Hearing:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 May 2008 – Radio Regenbogen Hörfunk in Baden v OHIM (RadioCom)**

**(Case T-254/06)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark RadioCom – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation
No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 40, 45, 48, 51, 54)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 July 2006 (Case R 1266/2005‐1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark RadioCom as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Radio Regenbogen Hörfunk in Baden Geschäftsführungs-GmbH |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark RadioCom for services in Classes 35, 38 and 41 – Application No 3986023 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Radio Regenbogen Hörfunk in Baden Geschäftsführungs-GmbH to pay the costs. |
CONSENT OF EXPERT


I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, Thomas Rice, SME Registered Member, and report, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada dated November 19, 2014 (the “ Report ”), and the information contained in my Report, as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, and (ii) Silver Standard Resources Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated this 22nd day of March, 2017.


Yours very sincerely,





/s/ Thomas Rice


Thomas Rice, SME Registered Member