Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices 57563 

Dusted shrimp is a shrimp–based 

product: 1) that is produced from fresh 

(or thawed–from-frozen) and peeled 

shrimp; 2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ layer of 

rice or wheat flour of at least 95 percent 

purity has been applied; 3) with the 

entire surface of the shrimp flesh 

thoroughly and evenly coated with the 

flour; 4) with the non–shrimp content of 

the end product constituting between 

four and 10 percent of the product’s 

total weight after being dusted, but prior 

to being frozen; and 5) that is subjected 

to individually quick frozen (IQF) 

freezing immediately after application 

of the dusting layer. Battered shrimp is 

a shrimp–based product that, when 

dusted in accordance with the 

definition of dusting above, is coated 

with a wet viscous layer containing egg 

and/or milk, and par–fried. 

The products covered by this order 

are currently classified under the 

following HTS subheadings: 

0306.13.00.03, 0306.13.00.06, 

0306.13.00.09, 0306.13.00.12, 

0306.13.00.15, 0306.13.00.18, 

0306.13.00.21, 0306.13.00.24, 

0306.13.00.27, 0306.13.00.40, 

1605.20.10.10, and 1605.20.10.30. These 

HTS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes 

only and are not dispositive, but rather 

the written description of the scope of 

this order is dispositive. 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(d), we are initiating a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on certain frozen warmwater 

shrimp from Ecuador produced and 

exported by Studmark. Because we are 

initiating this new shipper review in the 

month immediately following the first 

semianniversary month, this review 

covers the period from August 4, 2004, 

through July 31, 2005, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.214(g)(ii)(B). We 

intend to issue the preliminary results 

of this review no later than 180 days 

after the date on which this review is 

initiated, and the final results within 90 

days after the date on which we issue 

the preliminary results. See section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

We will instruct the U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to suspend 

liquidation of any unliquidated entries 

of the subject merchandise from 

Studmark and allow, at the option of the 

importer, the posting, until completion 

of the review, of a bond or security in 

lieu of a cash deposit for each entry of 

the merchandise exported by Studmark 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Because Studmark certified that it both 

produces and exports the subject 

merchandise, the sale of which is the 

basis for this new shipper review 

request, we will permit the bonding 

privilege only for those entries of 

subject merchandise for which 

Studmark is both the producer and the 

exporter. 

Interested parties may submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. 

This initiation and notice are in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d). 

Dated: September 26, 2005. 

Holly A. Kuga, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–19684 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Quarterly Update to Annual Listing of 

Foreign Government Subsidies on 

Articles of Cheese Subject to an In–

Quota Rate of Duty 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Agriculture, has prepared 

its quarterly update to the annual list of 

foreign government subsidies on articles 

of cheese subject to an in–quota rate of 

duty during the period April 1, 2005, 

through June 31, 2005. We are 

publishing the current listing of those 

subsidies that we have determined exist. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 3, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tipten Troidl or Eric Greynolds, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–1767 or (202) 482–

6071, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

702 of the Trade Agreements Act of 

1979 (as amended) (‘‘the Act’’) requires 

the Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) to determine, in 

consultation with the Secretary of 

Agriculture, whether any foreign 

government is providing a subsidy with 

respect to any article of cheese subject 

to an in–quota rate of duty, as defined 

in section 702(h) of the Act, and to 

publish an annual list and quarterly 

updates of the type and amount of those 

subsidies. We hereby provide the 

Department’s quarterly update of 

subsidies on articles of cheese that were 

imported during the period April 1, 

2005, through June 31, 2005. 

The Department has developed, in 

consultation with the Secretary of 

Agriculture, information on subsidies 

(as defined in section 702(h) of the Act) 

being provided either directly or 

indirectly by foreign governments on 

articles of cheese subject to an in–quota 

rate of duty. The appendix to this notice 

lists the country, the subsidy program or 

programs, and the gross and net 

amounts of each subsidy for which 

information is currently available. The 

Department will incorporate additional 

programs which are found to constitute 

subsidies and additional information on 

the subsidy programs listed, as the 

information is developed. 

The Department encourages any 

person having information on foreign 

government subsidy programs which 

benefit articles of cheese subject to an 

in–quota rate of duty to submit such 

information in writing to the Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

This determination and notice are in 

accordance with section 702(a) of the 

Act. 

Dated: September 23, 2005. 

Holly A. Kuga, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

APPENDIX 

SUBSIDY PROGRAMS ON CHEESE SUBJECT TO AN IN–QUOTA RATE OF DUTY1

Country Program(s) Gross2 Subsidy ($/lb) Net3 Subsidy ($/lb) 

Austria ............................................................ European Union Restitution 

Payments 

$0.00 $ 0.00 

Belgium .......................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

57564 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices 

APPENDIX—Continued 

SUBSIDY PROGRAMS ON CHEESE SUBJECT TO AN IN–QUOTA RATE OF DUTY1

Country Program(s) Gross2 Subsidy ($/lb) Net3 Subsidy ($/lb) 

Canada .......................................................... Export Assistance on Certain 

Types of Cheese 

$ 0.28 $ 0.28 

Cyprus ............................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Denmark ........................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Finland ........................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

France ............................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Germany ........................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Greece ........................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Hungary ......................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Ireland ............................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Italy ................................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Lithuania ........................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Luxembourg ................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Netherlands .................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Norway ........................................................... Indirect (Milk) Subsidy $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

........................................................................ Consumer Subsidy $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

........................................................................ Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Poland ............................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Portugal .......................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Slovenia ......................................................... EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Spain .............................................................. EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Switzerland .................................................... Deficiency Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

U.K. ................................................................ EU Restitution Payments $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

1This chart includes only those countries which exported articles of cheese to the United States during 1st Quarter, 2005. 

2 Defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(5). 

3 Defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(6). 

[FR Doc. 05–19686 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am] 

(BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S) 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[I.D. 092705B] 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Take of Anadromous Fish 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: \ 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Oregon Department of Fish and 

Wildlife (ODFW) has submitted a 

Fishery Management and Evaluation 

Plan (FMEP) and the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife 

(WDFW) has submitted an amendment 

to an FMEP pursuant to the protective 

regulations promulgated for Lower 

Columbia River (LCR) coho salmon 

under the Endangered Species Act. The 

FMEPs specify the future management 

of inland recreational fisheries 

potentially affecting LCR coho salmon. 

This document serves to notify the 

public of the availability of the FMEPs 

for review and comment before final 

approval or disapproval is made by 

NMFS. 

DATES: Comments on the FMEPs must 

be received at the appropriate address or 

fax number (see ADDRESSES) no later 

than 5 p.m. Pacific daylight time on 

November 2, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the 

application should be addressed to the 

Salmon Recovery Division, Hatcheries 

and Inland Fisheries Branch, 1201 NE 

Lloyd Blvd. Suite 1100, Portland, OR 

97232 or faxed to 503–872–2737. 

Comments may be submitted by e-mail. 

The mailbox address for providing email comments is 

LCRCohoFMEPs.nwr@noaa.gov. Include 

in the subject line of the e-mail 

comment the following identifier: 

Comments on LCR Coho FMEPs. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Turner, Portland, Oregon, at 

phone number: (503) 736–4737, or email: rich.turner@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Species Covered in This Notice 

This notice is relevant to the Lower 

Columbia River coho salmon 

(Oncorhynchus kisutch), Lower 

Columbia River Chinook salmon (O. 

tshawytscha), Lower Columbia River 

steelhead (O. mykiss), and Columbia 

River chum salmon (O. keta) 

evolutionarily significant unit (ESU). 

ODFW has submitted to NMFS an 

FMEP: Lower Columbia River Coho in 

Oregon Freshwater Fisheries of the 

Lower Columbia River Tributaries 

(between the Pacific Ocean and Hood 

River). WDFW has submitted an 

amendment to their Lower Columbia 

River FMEP for inland recreational 

fisheries potentially affecting listed 

adult and juvenile LCR coho salmon. 

These FMEPs include fisheries 

occurring in all tributaries to the Lower 

Columbia River from the Pacific Ocean 

to the Hood River in Oregon and the Big 

White Salmon River in Washington. The 

objective of the fisheries described in 

these FMEPs is to harvest known, 

hatchery-origin coho salmon, and other 

fish species in a manner that does not 

appreciably reduce the likelihood of 

survival and recovery of listed LCR 

salmon and steelhead ESUs. All 

fisheries included in these FMEPs will 

be managed such that only hatcheryorigin coho salmon that are adipose finclipped may be retained. Impact levels 

on listed LCR coho salmon are specified 

in ODFW’s FMEP and the amendment 

to WDFW’s FMEP. Population viability 

analysis and risk assessments in the 

FMEPs indicate the extinction risk for 

listed coho salmon would not increase 

as a result of the proposed fisheries. A 

variety of monitoring and evaluation 

tasks are specified in the FMEPs to 

assess the abundance of coho salmon, 

determine fishery effort and catch of 

coho salmon and other species, and 

monitor angler compliance. A review of 

compliance with the provisions of the 

FMEPs will be conducted by the state 

fisheries agencies annually and a