alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
        connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending October 31, 2007, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
        to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




/s/
                  MARK GUSTAFSONMark
                  GustafsonPresident
                  (Principal Executive Officer)March
                  6, 2008
#### Harry A. Fine, Appellant, *v.*American Eagle Fire Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 25, 1943.

*Philip Wolinsky*for appellant.

*Francis X. Nestor*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

MacCrate, Smith and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
# C_2009256EN.01002501.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (Centrixx)

(Case T-446/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark Centrixx - Earlier national word mark sensixx - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 256/45

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Royal Appliance International GmbH (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: K.-J. Michaeli and M. Schork, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and B. Schmidt, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2007 (Case R 572/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and Royal Appliance International GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Royal Appliance International GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Royal Appliance International GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-15877, 333-51681, 333-79579, 333-102672 and 333-110110) on Form S-8 and the
registration statements (Nos. 333-106615 and 333-115459) on Form S-3 of
Northfield Laboratories Inc. of our report dated July 12, 2004, relating to the
balance sheets of Northfield Laboratories Inc. as of May 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2004 and for
the cumulative period from June 19, 1985 (inception) through May 31, 2004, which
report appears in the May 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Northfield
Laboratories Inc.

Our report refers to a change in accounting due to the adoption of the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations."

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
August 12, 2004
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ADESA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.Gartzke, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  David G. Gartzke   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

*This certification accompanies the Report pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.*

 

1

----
General Media, Inc.
          Computation of Ratio of Earning to Fixed Charges
                      Year Ended December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                1994           1995           1996             1997            1998
                                                ----           ----           ----             ----            ----
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>          
Income (loss) from continuing
   operations, before income taxes      $  3,769,000    ($10,012,000)   ($   701,000)   ($ 1,915,000)   ($ 3,879,000)
                                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Adjustments to income (loss)
   Interest expense                       10,474,000      10,302,000       9,907,000       9,918,000       9,918,000
   Interest income                          (564,000)       (541,000)       (319,000)       (611,000)           (517)
   Interest expense in rental charges         87,000         689,000         789,000         754,000         757,000
                                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Adjusted income (loss)                  $ 13,766,000    $    438,000    $  9,676,000    $  8,146,000    $  6,795,483
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============
Fixed charges
   Interest expense                     $ 10,474,000    $ 10,302,000    $  9,907,000    $  9,918,000    $  9,918,000
   Interest expense in rental charges         87,000         689,000         789,000         754,000         757,000
                                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Total fixed charges                     $ 10,561,000    $ 10,991,000    $ 10,696,000    $ 10,672,000    $ 10,675,000
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

   Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            1.3             0.0             0.9             0.8             0.6
                                                 ====           ====            ====            ====             ===

</TABLE>
STATE v. Ellis and JENNINGS

197P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

*227Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jennings, Stephon Deandre.

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Ellis, Javonta Marquez.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney Geneal, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of May 2016 by State of NC to Dismiss Appeal of Defendant Ellis:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00944-CR

Rickie RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR4578

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 30, 2019

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Rickie Rodriguez pled nolo contendere to 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to five years of imprisonment and a 

fine of $1500.00 in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On November 5, 

2018, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial 

court also certified that this is a criminal case “in which the defendant has waived the right of 

appeal.” After Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification 
04-18-00944-CR

- 2 -

and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial 

court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the 

punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor 

and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed 

and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. 

See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a pleabargain case and that Rodriguez does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 

Id. 25.2(d). 

On December 17, 2018, we informed Rodriguez that this appeal would be dismissed 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification 

showing that he had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record by January 16, 2019. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 

2003, order). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4235 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the maximum payment 

amount for certain qualified losses under the Traumatic Injury Protection 

under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mrs. BUSTOS (for herself and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the maximum payment amount for certain qualified losses under 

the Traumatic Injury Protection under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taylor Morris Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4235 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF MAXIMUM PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR 

2 CERTAIN QUALIFIED LOSSES UNDER TRAU3 MATIC INJURY PROTECTION UNDER 

4 SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 Section 1980A(d) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and the max9 imum payment’’ and inserting ‘‘and, except as pro10 vided by paragraph (3)(A), the maximum’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3)(A) The maximum payment amount described in 

14 paragraph (1) shall not apply to a qualifying loss directly 

15 caused by a traumatic event described in subparagraph 

16 (B). The Secretary shall determine the payment schedule 

17 for such qualifying losses as the Secretary determines ap18 propriate without regard to such maximum payment 

19 amount. 

20 ‘‘(B) A traumatic event described in this subpara21 graph is one of the following: 

22 ‘‘(i) Armed conflict. 

23 ‘‘(ii) Training under conditions simulating 

24 armed conflict. 

25 ‘‘(iii) Hazardous service. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4235 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) A traumatic event caused through an in2 strumentality of war.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018196EN.01003001.xml

| 8.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/30

---

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

EGTC Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai

(2018/C 196/10)

I.   Name of the EGTC, address and contact point

Name of the EGTC, address and contact point

Official name: European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai

Official name

Registered office: Lille

Registered office

Contact point: Mr Loïc Delhuvenne, director of the Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai Eurometropolis agency

Contact point

Mail:

Mail

Internet/email address of the grouping: www.eurometropolis.eu

Internet/email address of the grouping

II.   Changes regarding the contact point, director, head office and internet address of the EGTC

Changes regarding the contact point, director, head office and internet address of the EGTC

New contact point:

New contact point

New person responsible (Director):

New person responsible (Director)

New registered office:

New registered office

New internet address:

New internet address

III.   New members (1)

New members

1

Official name:

Official name

Postal address:

Postal address

Internet address:

Internet address

Type of member:

Type of member

Country:

Country

IV.   Changes regarding the name, contact point, director, registered office, internet address of the members (2)

Changes regarding the name, contact point, director, registered office, internet address of the members

2

Official name: Hauts-de-France Region

Official name

Registered head office:

Registered head office

Contact point:

Contact point

Email:

Email

Internet address of the Grouping:

Internet address of the Grouping

Official name: The European Metropolis of Lille

Official name

Registered head office:

Registered head office

Contact point:

Contact point

Email:

Email

Internet address of the Grouping:

Internet address of the Grouping

Official name: West-Vlaamse Intercommunale

Official name

Registered head office:

Registered head office

Contact point:

Contact point

Email:

Email

Internet address of the Grouping:

Internet address of the Grouping

Official name: Intercommunal Agency for Development

Official name

Registered head office:

Registered head office

Contact point:

Contact point

Email:

Email

Internet address of the Grouping:

Internet address of the Grouping

Official name: The Intercommunal Association IEG

Official name

Registered head office:

Registered head office

Contact point:

Contact point

Email:

Email

Internet address of the Grouping:

Internet address of the Grouping

---

(1)  Please provide this information for each new member.

1

(2)  Please provide this information for each further change.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                          US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,413
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,096
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,589
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         260,049
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,520
<LOANS>                                        354,779
<ALLOWANCE>                                        957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,965
<DEPOSITS>                                     390,486
<SHORT-TERM>                                   202,381
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,854
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               20
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 647,965
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,089
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,645
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    66
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                45,800
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,458
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,985
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      919
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 935
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,747
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,747
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,195
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.94
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,250
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,414
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   418
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,485
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      393
<RECOVERIES>                                       120
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,957
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,957
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,131
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Brian Keith BLACKWELL

No. 197P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Brian Keith Blackwell, for Blackwell, Brian Keith

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th of June 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of June 2017 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2017 by Defendant to Amend Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of August 2017 by Defendant to Dismiss:

> *397"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01



                      RED ROOF INNS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE AMOUNTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      1995         1996          1997
                                                                  -----------   -----------  -----------
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>          <C>        
Net income                                                        $    18,322   $    24,064  $    25,358
                                                                  ===========   ===========  ===========
Weighted  average number of historical common shares
  outstanding during the year - basic                                  18,400        27,362       27,982
                                                                  ===========   ===========  ===========

Add - common equivalent shares (determined using the
  "treasury stock" method) representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of employee stock options                                 121           187          185 
                                                                  -----------   -----------  ----------- 
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of
  income per share - diluted                                           18,521        27,549       28,167
                                                                  ===========   ===========  ===========

Net income per share:
  Basic                                                           $      1.00   $       .88  $       .91
                                                                  ===========   ===========  ===========
  Diluted                                                         $       .99   $       .87  $       .90
                                                                  ===========   ===========  ===========
</TABLE>




                                       50