alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7536

JAMES A. G. BUNCH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDALL LEE, Superintendent; NURSE EMERY, RN Supervisor; DOCTOR CROCKRAN, Physician; J. A. DOBBEN, Grievance Examiner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-654-5-FL) Submitted: February 9, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. G. Bunch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James A. G. Bunch, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bunch v. Lee , No. CA-03-654-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Parent                                  Subsidiary                            Ownership          Organization
----------------------                 -----------------------------                ---------          ------------

<S>                                    <C>                                           <C>                <C>
Western Ohio Financial                 Springfield Federal Savings                    100%                Federal
Corporation                             Bank

Western Ohio Financial                 Mayflower Federal Savings Bank                 100%                Federal
Corporation

Western Ohio Financial                 Seven Hills Savings Association                100%                Federal
Corporation

Springfield Federal Savings            Springfield-Home Community                      50%                Ohio
 Bank                                  Reinvestment Corporation

Springfield Federal Savings            West Central Financial Services,               100%                Ohio
 Bank                                  Inc.
</TABLE>



         The financial statements of the Registrant are consolidated with those
of its subsidiaries.
# Official Journal C 43A/28 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 43A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 43A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 43 A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions – COM/2022/20072 | 1 |
| 2022/C 43 A/02 | Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Chair of the Single Resolution Board – COM/2022/20074 | 6 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2022/C 43 A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions – COM/2022/20072

1

2022/C 43 A/02

Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Chair of the Single Resolution Board – COM/2022/20074

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of Lacy R. WHEELER, III.

No. 322 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Rec*951ommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4132 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4132

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the size of 
    employers eligible for the credit for employee health insurance 
                      expenses of small employers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2014

   Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself, Mr. Peters of California, Mr. 
  Garcia, Mr. Delaney, and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the size of 
    employers eligible for the credit for employee health insurance 
                      expenses of small employers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Entrepreneurs Lower Prices 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMPLOYERS ELIGIBLE FOR TAX CREDIT FOR EMPLOYEE 
              HEALTH INSURANCE EXPENSES OF SMALL EMPLOYERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 45R(d)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``25'' and inserting ``50''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4273 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in The Dalles, Oregon, as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial 

Veterans’ Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2014 

Mr. WALDEN (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BONAMICI, 

and Mr. SCHRADER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in The Dalles, Oregon, as the 

‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

5 THE DALLES, OREGON. 

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs community7 based outpatient clinic located at 704 Veterans Drive, The 

8 Dalles, Oregon, shall after the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Loren R. KaufVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:41 Mar 21, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4273.IH H4273

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4273 IH

1 man Memorial Veterans’ Clinic’’. Any reference to such 

2 community-based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, 

3 map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

4 States shall be considered to be a reference to the Loren 

5 R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ Clinic. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TREJO v. NC DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER RETIREMENT SYSTEM DIVISION

420P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 23, 2018

*761Susannah P. Holloway, Assistant Attorney General, M. A. Kelly Chambers, Special Deputy Attorney General, James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for NC Department of State Treasurer Retirement Systems Division.

Branch W. Vincent, III, Attorney at Law, Southern Shores, John R. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Robert E. Zaytoun, Attorney at Law, Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Trejo, Stephanie T.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2018 by Petitioner for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of January 2018."
Order filed March 10, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00062-CV

____________

JANINE SCHORR MORRISON AND ANN-MARIE SEPUKA, Appellant

V.

TNG BENEFITS, LLC D/B/A THE NOBLE GROUP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-DCV-266198

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 3, 2020. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On February 7, 2020, this court ordered the Rhonda Colgin, the court 

reporter, to file the record within 15 days. Neither the record nor a motion to extend 

time to file the record has been filed.

We order Rhonda Colgin to file the record in this appeal within 15 days of 

the date of this order. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional 
2

circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring 

that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Rhonda 

Colgin does not timely file the record as ordered, we may issue an order directing 

the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the 

record.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Sew Cal Logo, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Songer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. Such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
      February 28, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Sew Cal Logo, Inc.

Dated: May 4, 2006

SEW CAL LOGO, INC.


By: /s/ Richard Songer
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2005-21874; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-28]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Dodge City Regional Airport, KS.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 29, 2005 (70 FR 43744). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on October 27, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on September 8, 2005. 

Elizabeth S. Wallis,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Service Operations.

[FR Doc. 05-19203  Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Robert D. FORDHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 2D03-1102, 2D03-2801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 1, 2003.

FULMER, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Robert Fordham challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on September 30, 2002, and the summary dismissal of his second motion for postconviction relief filed on January 27, 2003. Both motions raised the same jail credit issue framed as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We affirm one order and reverse the other order.

The trial court denied Fordham’s first motion because it failed to meet the pleading requirements of rule 3.850(c). In its order, the trial court advised Fordham that rule 3.987 provides a model form for use in motions for postconviction relief. We agree with the trial court’s determination that Fordham’s motion lacked the requisite allegations and, therefore, affirm the trial court’s order denying Fordham’s first motion. *See Schofield v. State,*641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Following the advice of the trial court, Fordham utilized the form provided in rule 3.987 and filed a second motion seeking the same relief sought in the first motion. The trial court dismissed the second motion as facially insufficient because it failed to “state the reason the claim in the present motion was not raised in the former motion” as required by rule 3.850(c)(4). The trial court overlooked the fact that the claim raised in the second motion was, in fact, the same claim raised in the first motion. And, Fordham’s second motion was not successive because the trial court had not ruled on the merits of the first motion. *See Wright v. State,*741 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order dismissing Fordham’s second motion and remand for the trial court to consider the motion on its merits.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and VILLANTI, J., Concur.
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

39P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Arthur O. Armstrong, Los Angeles, CA, for Armstrong, Arthur O.

The following order has been entered on the motions filed by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Writ of Mandamus:

"All Motions Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
# C_2011038EN.01001801.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/18

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2010 — Bleser v Court of Justice

(Case F-25/07) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Appointment - Classification in grade by application of new, less favourable, rules - Articles 2 and 13 of Annexe XIII to the Staff Regulations - Principle of transparency - Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Duty of care - Principle of sound administration - Principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity - The prohibition on reformatio in pejus - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Principle of good faith - Principle patere legem quam ipse fecisti)

2011/C 38/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Bleser (Nittel, Germany) (represented by: P. Goergen and M. Wehrheim, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented initially by: M. Schauss, Agent, later by A. V. Placco and M. Glaeser, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and M. Simm, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, in accordance with the less favourable provisions thereof (Article 12 of Annex XII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 36.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Fredrick L. CANADY

No. 357P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Fredrick L. Canady, for Canady, Fredrick L.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of October 2017 in *571this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Columbus County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of October 2017 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of October 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adera Mines Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Slavko Bebek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of December, 2005.



| | /s/ Slavko Bebek                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Slavko Bebek                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 and Statements of Income for the twelve months
ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,266,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,207,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,845,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   259,000
<INVENTORY>                                    960,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,535,000
<PP&E>                                       3,585,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,673,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,556,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,640,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,754,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,065,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,556,000
<SALES>                                     25,337,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,337,000
<CGS>                                       15,988,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,988,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,113,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,943,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,754,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,189,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,189,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94

        

</TABLE>