alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NORTH CAROLINA v. Jonathan James NEWELL

No. 256P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Jonathan James Newell, for Newell, Jonathan James.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*244***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2016 by Defendant to Disclose the Past and the Present Relationships, Associations, and Ties between Defense Attorney and Victim's Father:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2016 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th of July 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of July 2016 by Defendant for Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Correct Judicial and Procedural Act on Subject Matter Jurisdiction:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of August 2016 by Defendant for a Subpoena Duces Tecum:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of September 2015 by Defendant to Grant Belated Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of September 2016 by Defendant to Dismiss First Degree Murder Bill of Information:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of September 2016 by Defendant to Plead to Lesser Degree or Offense:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of September 2016 by Defendant to Proceed no Security for Costs in Criminal Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 30 , 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00395

- CV

D. L.

- B., Appellant

v.

T. D. and J. D., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIA NA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the tr i a l court on May 16 , 2019

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

.

Because appellant is indigent and u nab l e to p ay co sts, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 23.2





                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 
No. 33-94782), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211) and 
in the related Prospectus of Liberty Property Trust and Liberty Property 
Limited Partnership of our report dated February 12, 1999, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liberty 
Property Limited Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
for the year ended December 31, 1998.




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
February 24, 1999                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian R. Cheston, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Rapa Mining Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            
|

| | By:    | /s/ Brian R. Cheston                  
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| | Name:  | BRIAN R. CHESTON                      
| | Title: | President, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief
| |        | Executive Officer and Chief Financial 
| |        | Officer                               
| | Date:  | June 15, 2005                         

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronnie Paul GODBEY

No. 443PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 22, 2017

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Anita LeVeaux, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Sherri Horner Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         721
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                46229
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             49950
<PP&E>                                     4498484
<DEPRECIATION>                             2444578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2112483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       583476
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     76254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  43168
<OTHER-SE>                                 1267825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2112483
<SALES>                                     201102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2115345
<CGS>                                       976870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1579283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           49894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1413832)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1413832)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1413832)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.21)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 323/2 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 323 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 592 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 323

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 592 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 323/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 323/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BELL v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, et al.

135P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 26, 2017

Matthew J. Ledwith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, M. Duane Jones, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Goodyear Tire And Rubber Company, et al.

Kathleen G. Sumner, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Bell, Celia A.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of April 2017 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of April 2017."
STATE of North Carolina v. Claude Leon MCCLINTON

No. COA16-887

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,584
<SECURITIES>                                     5,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,825
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,769
<PP&E>                                          29,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           220
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,056
<SALES>                                         70,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,661
<CGS>                                            4,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,102
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
HAIRSTON v. HARWARD

416A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2017

C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, James M. Roane, III, Attorney at Law, John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Hairston, William (Jr.)

Kent L. Hamrick, Attorney at Law, Ann C. Rowe, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, for Harward, Ashwell Bennett (Jr.)

Stephanie W. Anderson, Attorney at Law, for Erie Insurance Exchange.

Sara R. Lincoln, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Humble, Robert S. (M.D.), et al.

Ann C. Ochsner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Huntington M. Willis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Deborah J. Bowers, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

Andrew Pinto, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of December 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 9th day of February 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### James WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 2, 2003.

James Washington, Florida City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Adams v. State,*800 So.2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS ALEXANDER AMADORGUTIERREZ, AKA Douglas Amador, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71046 

Agency No. A208-559-439 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2019**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Douglas Alexander Amador-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Honduras, 

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing 

his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for 

asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71046 

(“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. GarciaMilian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We review de novo

questions of law. Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008). We 

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Amador-Gutierrez

established changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely asylum 

application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4)-(5). Thus, Amador-Gutierrez’s asylum 

claim fails.

In his opening brief, Amador-Gutierrez fails to challenge the agency’s 

denial of his withholding of removal and CAT claims. See Corro-Barragan v. 

Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening 

brief resulted in waiver). 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that AmadorGutierrez failed to establish eligibility for humanitarian asylum. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.13(b)(1)(iii); see also Singh v. Whitaker, 914 F.3d 654, 662 (9th Cir. 2019)

(discussing the applicant’s burden to show that humanitarian relief is warranted).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal 
3 19-71046 

because Amador-Gutierrez raises no colorable legal or constitutional claim. See

Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir. 2005) (the court’s 

jurisdiction over challenges to the agency’s discretionary hardship determination is 

limited to constitutional claims or questions of law). 

The agency did not err in concluding that Amador-Gutierrez could not 

establish derivative legal status through his great-grandmother. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(b)(3)(A) (derivative asylum available to an asylee’s spouse or child); 8 

U.S.C. § 1254a (discussing Temporary Protected Status).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
# C_2008197EN.01002402.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/24

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2008 — Bligny v Commission

(Case T-127/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Open competition - Conditions governing admission - Not admitted at the stage of correction of the written test - Competition notice - Incomplete application - Proof of citizenship - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2008/C 197/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Francesco Bligny (Tassin-la-Demi-Lune, France) (represented by: P. Lebel-Nourissat, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2007 in Joined Cases F-142/06 and F-142/06 AJ Bligny v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Bligny

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Francesco Bligny shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Francesco Bligny shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
JACKSON v. CENTURY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

337A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 22, 2018

Tony S. Botros, Attorney at Law, for Jackson, Thomas, et al.

Susan K. Burkhart, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Century Mutual Insurance Company.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of January 2018 by Plaintiff to Amend Reply Brief with Proposed Amended Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2018."
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas King, Chief Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ Douglas King       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | DOUGLAS KING           
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | February 22, 2007      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
  be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
Mike CAUSEY, Commissioner of Insurance of North Carolina v. CANNON SURETY, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company

No. 373P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2017

Mark L. Bibbs, Attorney at Law, for Cannon Surety, L.L.C.

*497M. Denise Stanford, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Heather H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, for Causey, Mike (Commissioner of Insurance)

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of November 2017 by Petitioner for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 6th of November 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Business Court (Wake County), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Business Court (Wake County):

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 6th of November 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Business Court, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Business Court:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2017."