alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**     I, Robert Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of Town Sports    International Holdings, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state    a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and    other financial information included in this quarterly report    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly    report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By:     /s/  Robert Giardina    Robert Giardina*Chief Executive Office*
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4318 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to conform citizen suits 

under that Act with other existing law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mrs. 

LUMMIS, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, 

Mr. HARRIS, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 

Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. VALADAO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to conform 

citizen suits under that Act with other existing law, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Species 

5 Litigation Reasonableness Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4318 IH

1 SEC. 2. AWARD OF LITIGATION COSTS TO PREVAILING PAR2 TIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING LAW. 

3 Section 11(g)(4) of the Endangered Species Act of 

4 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1540(g)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘to 

5 any’’ and all that follows through the end of the sentence 

6 and inserting ‘‘to any prevailing party in accordance with 

7 section 2412 of title 28, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Mark E. Pape, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affirmative InsuranceHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.Dated: May 10, 2007                                         /s/ Mark E. Pape   Mark E. Pape   Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer (Principal FinancialOfficer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
In the MATTER OF: L.D.

No. COA17-575

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
MultiSoft-2013.1.31 - EX10.1 Amend Revolver


EXHIBIT 10.1








                                
May 7, 2013






Multi Soft II, Inc.
100 SE 2nd Street, 32nd Floor
Miami, FL 33131




Re:  Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note




Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the "Revolver") dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $200,000 to $250,000.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Amendment No. 2 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.




	
				
	BORROWER:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	MULTI SOFT II, INC., a Florida Corporation

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Robert M. Lundgren

	 
	 
	Name:
	Robert M. Lundgren

	 
	 
	 
	Director

	 
	 
	 
	 

	LENDER:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Marc N. Bell

	 
	 
	Name:
	Marc N. Bell

	 
	 
	 
	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
# C_2008301EN.01003302.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October 2008 — Imperial Chemical Industries v OHIM (LIGHT & SPACE)

(Case T-224/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for registration of Community word mark LIGHT & SPACE - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 301/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Imperial Chemical Industries plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: initially by S. Malynicz, Barrister and V. Chandler, Solicitor and subsequently by S. Malynicz, J. Bainbridge and K. Briggs, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 March 2007 (Case R 1631/2006-1) concerning registration of the sign LIGHT & SPACE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Imperial Chemical Industries plc to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Imperial Chemical Industries plc to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.

1

---
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
To Fixed Charges
 Three Months
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,EndedMarch 31, 2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Net income
    
    $
    5,934
    
    
    $
    26,645
    
    
    $
    40,338
    
    
    $
    28,223
    
    
    $
    27,556
    
    
    $
    34,488Add total fixed charges (per below)
    
    
    6,230
    
    
    
    24,751
    
    
    
    15,125
    
    
    
    14,815
    
    
    
    11,324
    
    
    
    2,279Total earnings
    
    $
    12,164
    
    
    $
    51,396
    
    
    $
    55,463
    
    
    $
    43,038
    
    
    $
    38,880
    
    
    $
    36,767Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    5,403
    
    
    $
    21,763
    
    
    $
    13,289
    
    
    $
    13,056
    
    
    $
    9,633
    
    
    $
    697Capitalized interest
    
    
    289
    
    
    
    1,007
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimate of interest within rental expense(1)
    
    
    538
    
    
    
    1,981
    
    
    
    1,836
    
    
    
    1,759
    
    
    
    1,691
    
    
    
    1,582Total fixed charges
    
    $
    6,230
    
    
    $
    24,751
    
    
    $
    15,125
    
    
    $
    14,815
    
    
    $
    11,324
    
    
    $
    2,279Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.95
    
    
    
    2.08
    
    
    
    3.67
    
    
    
    2.91
    
    
    
    3.43
    
    
    
    16.13
 
 (1)
    
    Represents 30% of the total operating lease rental expense which is that portion deemed to be
interest.
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wako
Logistics Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to the best of my
knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date: 
May 17, 2005
 ****By:
    /s/ Christopher WoodChristopher
      Wood
      Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 This
certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00223-CV

NO. 02-15-00224-CV

NO. 02-15-00225-CV

NO. 02-15-00226-CV

NO. 02-15-00227-CV

NO. 02-15-00228-CV

NO. 02-15-00233-CV

NO. 02-15-00234-CV

NO. 02-15-00235-CV

NO. 02-15-00236-CV

ADAM K. GOLDEN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. 1293990D, 1296000D, 1293989D, 1296288D, 1286758D, 

1276101D, 1323790D, 1323812D, 1323805D, 1323795D

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 31, 2015
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 15, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00861-CV 

IN RE DAVID BARNES, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-11126 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

In this original proceeding, relator David Barnes challenges the trial court’s 

July 26, 2021 temporary order denying him possession of the subject children. On 

November 17, 2021, the trial court issued a ruling modifying the possession schedule 

set forth in the July 26, 2021 order and awarding relator two hours of supervised 

possession per month. Because the trial court’s July 26, 2021 order is no longer in 

effect, we questioned our jurisdiction over this original proceeding as it now 

appeared relator’s request for relief is moot, and we directed relator to file either a 

motion to dismiss the original proceeding or a letter brief showing cause why the 

original proceeding should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 
 –2– 

After reviewing relator’s letter brief and real party in interest’s response, we 

conclude that this original proceeding is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition 

for writ of mandamus. 

Also before the court is relator’s October 4, 2021 motion to seal court records. 

We grant the motion and direct the Clerk of the Court to place relator’s October 4, 

2021 petition for writ of mandamus and the accompanying mandamus record under 

seal. 

210861F.P05 

/Amanda L. Reichek/ 

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3526

___________

Ruthie Mae Stewart, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

General Mills Operations, LLC, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 3, 2010

Filed: May 21, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ruthie Mae Stewart appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of her action in which

she alleged that General Mills violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.

After careful de novo review, see Banks v. Int’l Union Elec., Elec., Technical,

Salaried & Mach. Workers, 390 F.3d 1049, 1052 (8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that

dismissal of the suit on federal-law res judicata grounds was proper, see Taylor v.

Sturgell, 128 S. Ct. 2161, 2171 (2008) (preclusive effect of federal-court judgment in

federal-question case is determined by federal common law); Rutherford v. Kessel,
-2-

560 F.3d 874, 877 (8th Cir. 2009) (res judicata precludes second suit if "its claims

arise out of the same nucleus of operative facts as the prior claim"). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 12.1

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Stefano De Angelis, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TIM Participações S.A.;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.       Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have:

 

a)       Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)       Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

d)       Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.       Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)       Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b)       Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: April 10, 2017
STATE of North Carolina v. Walter Columbus SIMMONS

No. COA16-1065

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Stefano De Angelis, Chief Executive Officer of TIM Participações S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TIM Participações S.A.

Dated:    April 5, 2018

By:

   /s/ Stefano De AngelisName:    Stefano De AngelisTitle:       Chief Executive Officer






---
STATE of North Carolina v. Omar Jalam COOK

No. 251A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed March 2, 2018

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. Joseph S. KING v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re King, Joseph S.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 389-445; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-0138.

Denied.
IN RE: SOUTHEASTERN EYE CENTER

358A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Douglas S. Harris, Attorney at Law, for Harris, Douglas S.

Scott F. Wyatt, Attorney at Law, High Point, Donavan J. Hylarides, Attorney at Law, for Harris, Richard A., et al.

James Mark McDaniel, Jr., for McDaniel, James Mark (Jr.).

Byron L. Saintsing, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Nivison Family Investments, LLC, et al.

Robert E. Fields, III, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorney at Law, for Jeutter, Jr. reciever for CCSEA/SCLC/SEM/HUTA/EMS/KEPES/DRE.

Eric H. Biesecker, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

Connie E. Carrigan, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Old Battleground Properties, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of November 2016 by Plaintiffs to Dismiss Appeals:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**EXHIBIT 12.1****Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                                               **Nine Months Ended**   **Year Ended December 31,**  **September 30,**   **2001**  **2002**  **2003**  **2004**  **2005**  **2006**   **(Dollars in Thousands)** Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations $496  $1,992  $2,661  $(4,364) $3,468  $1,731 Plus: Income Taxes  359   1,727   1,753   (2,476)  2,248   1,314 Fixed Charges  10,615   7,321   5,494   4,761   10,841   12,980                    Earnings Available for Fixed Charges  11,470   11,040   9,908   (2,079)  16,557   16,025                          Fixed Charges:                        Interest Expense  10,295   6,996   5,225   4,454   10,438   12,695 Estimate Portion of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest  320   325   269   307   403   285                    Total Fixed Charges  10,615   7,321   5,494   4,761   10,841   12,980                                             **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  **1.1**   **1.5**   **1.8**   **-0.4**   **1.5**   **1.2**                                             **Calculation of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest**                        Rental Expense  959   974   806   921   1,209   855 Estimated % Equivalent to Interest  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%                   Estimate Portion of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest  320   325   269   307   403   285
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
      I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Wako Logistics Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
      2005
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




**WAKO
                LOGISTICS GROUP, INC.**Date: August
                15, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Christopher
                WoodChristopher Wood
                Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive
                  Officer and
                  Director




This
      certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. 
      This
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
      Company specifically incorporates it by reference.