T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R AN C I S C O A L F ON S O A C E VE DO DE L E ON , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70052 A ge nc yN o. A 017- 838- 384 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d M a r c h 7, 2012 S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r24, 2012 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: T H O M A S , W A R D L A W , an d B E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F ranci sc o A ce vedo de L eon (“ D e L eon”) pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of a D ec em ber 28, 2010 de c i s i on r e nde r e d by the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( “ B I A ” ) . T he B I A a f f i rm e d a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on f i ndi ng D e L e on i ne l i gi bl e f or 

# FI LED OC T 26 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

cancel l at i on of re m ov al , pu rs uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b , because he w as conv i ct ed o f an ag g rav at ed fel o n y. W e use the m od i fi ed ca t egori ca l approach t o d et erm i ne w hether apetty theft w i th p ri ors c on vi ct i on un der C al . P enal C od e §§ 4 84 (a ) and 66 6 con st i tut es an a g g r a v a te d f

e lo n y u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 1 0 1 ( a ) ( 4 3 ) ( G ) . See U n i ted S ta tes v. R i vera , 658 F . 3d 1073, 1076- 77 ( 9th C i r . 2011) . U nde rtha tappr oa c h, D e L e on c ont e nds th a t th e r e c o r d e v id e n c e ( th e s in g le - c o u n t f e lo n yc o m p la in t a lle g in g th a t h e “d id unl a w f ul l y . . . s t e a l t a ke a nd c a rrya w a ythe pe r s ona l pr ope rtyof W a l M a rt , ” pl us th e ab stracto f j u d g m en treco rd i n g h i s g u i l ty p l ea t o th atco u n t ) d o es n o test ab l i sh tha thi s 2009 c onvi c t i on i s a n a ggr a va t e d f e l ony , be c aus e the abs tr a c tof j udgm e nt doe s note xpr e s s l y i ndi c a t e tha tD e L e on pl e a de d gui l ty“ a s c ha r ge d i n the com pl ai nt . ” C

f . Frego zo v. H

older , 5 7 6 F .3 d 1 0 3 0 , 1 0 4 0 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 9 ) ( “[T ]o i dent i fya c on vi ct i on as the generi c off ense throu gh the m od i fi ed ca t egori ca l appr oa c h, w he n the r e c or d of c onvi c t i on c om pr i s e s onl ythe i ndi c tm e nta nd the j udgm e nt , the j udgm e ntm us tc ont a i n the c r i t i c a l phr a s e ‘ a s c ha r ge d i n the I n f o rm a tio n .’” ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) ) . W e a ss um e f

or the pu rposes of thi s c as e, w i tho utdeci di ng , thatD e L eon h as es t abl i shed, because of the abse nce of thatph ra se , thati ti s i ncon cl usi ve w hether h is 2 0 0 9 p e ttyth e f

t w ith p r io r s c o n v ic tio n q u a lif ie s a s a n a g g r a v a te d f

e lo n y .3

U nde rthe R E A L I D A c t , w hi c h “ pl a c e s the bur de n of de m ons tr a t i ng e l i gi bi l i tyf or c a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l s qua r e l y on the nonc i t i z e n, ” “ a n i nc onc l us i ve r e c or d of conv i ct i on do es no tdem on stra t e e l i gi bi l i ty f or cancel l at i on of re m ov al . ” Y ou ngv. H older , — F .3 d — , 2 0 1 2 W L 4 0 7 4 6 6 8 , a t * 9 ( 9 th C ir . S e p t. 1 7 , 2 0 1 2 ) ( e n b a n c ) . D e L e on a l s o a s ks us t o t a ke j udi c i a l not i c e of the pl e ahe a r i ng tr a ns c r i pt u n d e r ly in g h is C a lif

o rn ias ta te c o n v ic tio n . “G e n e r a llyo u rr e v ie w is c o n f in e d to the adm i ni stra t i ve re cord before the B IA . ” D ent v. H older , 6 2 7 F .3 d 3 6 5 , 3 7 1 ( 9 th C i r. 20 10 ). W e m ayre vi ew ou t -of- re cord evi dence onl y w here the B IA consi ders the e vi de nc e ; the B I A abus e s i t s di s c r e t i on by f a i l i ng t o c ons i de rthe e vi de nc e ; the evi dence com es fr om the B IA ’ s ow n rec ords; or the evi dence w as no tavai l abl e a t th e tim e th e B I A m a d e its d e c is io n . I d. ; G af oorv . I . N . S. , 231 F . 3d 645, 655- 56 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , s upe rs e de d bys tatute on othe rgr ounds , P u b . L . 1 0 9 - 1 3 , d iv . B , § 10 1(h)(2), 11 9 S t at . 23 1, 30 5 (20 05 ). D e L eon d oes notcont end thatthe pl ea tr a ns c r i ptf

a l l s unde ra ny of

the s e e xc e pt i ons . T he r e f or e , w e de nyhi s r e que s tf or j ud i ci al no t i ce . F o r th e fo reg o i n g reaso n s, D e L eo n ’ s p et i t i o n i s DE NI E D.