alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-234/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel in Minister van Sociale Zaken, Staatssecretaris voor volksgezondheid v BVBA De Backer (1)

(Preliminary references - Not admissible)

(2006/C 36/36)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-234/05: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium), made by decision of 25 May 2005, received at the Court on 27 May 2005, in the proceedings between Minister van Sociale Zaken, Staatssecretaris voor volksgezondheid and BVBA De Backer — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of J. Malenovský, President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur) and J.-P. Puissochet, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 27 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Hof van beroep te Brussel by decision of 25 May 2005 is inadmissible.

----

(1)OJ C 205 of 20.8.2005

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136342 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136342 

 COA: 280065 

St. Joseph CC: 03-012027-FC

EDWARD MICHAEL HOFFMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

          - 25 CFR Part 61 
          - RIN 1076-AE44 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; reopening of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

This document reopens the comment period for the proposed rule published on May 19, 2005, which opened the enrollment applications process for the Western Shoshone Identifiable Group of Indians. 

# DATES:

Written comments must be received on or before October 28, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by the number 1076-AE44, by any of the following methods: 
      - Federal rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov.                          Follow the instructions for submitting comments.                     
      - Mail: Daisy West, Office of Tribal Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 320-SIB, Washington, DC 20240.
      - Hand delivery: Office of Tribal Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 320-SIB, Washington, DC 20240.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daisy West, Office of Tribal Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs, (202) 513-7641. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On May 19, 2005, the Bureau of Indian Affairs published a proposed rule to amend its regulations governing the compilation of rolls of Indians in order to open the enrollment applications process for the Western Shoshone Identifiable Group of Indians (70 FR 28859). Last year we made a commitment to hold meetings with the Shoshone people to discuss the proposed rule. We were unable, however, to schedule the meetings in Elko and Reno, Nevada until August 20 and 27, 2005. We must therefore extend the comment period beyond the original deadline of July 18, 2005. 

Dated: September 16, 2005. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05-19322 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,297
<SECURITIES>                                    30,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,725
<INVENTORY>                                        526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,136
<PP&E>                                          12,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,745
<SALES>                                         42,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,843
<CGS>                                            7,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   765
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (353)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Rubina Wadhwa ARORA.

No. 558 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
# Official Journal L 275/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6228 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 275

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6228 October 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1658 of 25 September 2019 on transposing the energy savings obligations under the Energy Efficiency Directive | 1 |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1659 of 25 September 2019 on the content of the comprehensive assessment of the potential for efficient heating and cooling under Article 14 of Directive 2012/27/EU | 94 |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1660 of 25 September 2019 on the implementation of the new metering and billing provisions of the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU | 121 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1658 of 25 September 2019 on transposing the energy savings obligations under the Energy Efficiency Directive

1

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1659 of 25 September 2019 on the content of the comprehensive assessment of the potential for efficient heating and cooling under Article 14 of Directive 2012/27/EU

94

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1660 of 25 September 2019 on the implementation of the new metering and billing provisions of the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU

121

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





Date:  December
      11, 2008
                    By:
                    /s/ MARK GUSTAFSONMark
      GustafsonChief
      Executive
Officer
State v. Bernard George Lamp, Jr.

222A14-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Anne M. Gomez, Kathleen M. Joyce, Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defenders, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, For Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Robert C. Montgomery, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Sarah M. Kirkman, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorneys, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of April 2016 by Defendant to Supplement Record on Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
# Official Journal C 427/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 427 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5818 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 427

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5818 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 427/1 | Position (EU) No 15/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)Adopted by the Council on 10 November 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 427/2 | Statement of Council's Reasons: Position (EU) No 15/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community Trade Mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 79 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 427/1

Position (EU) No 15/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)Adopted by the Council on 10 November 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 427/2

Statement of Council's Reasons: Position (EU) No 15/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community Trade Mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

79

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2612

ANTHONY J. RANKINE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN RANKINE; CEANET INCORPORATED; CEANET PARTY LIMITED; COLIN V. RUSSELL; STOREY BLACKWOOD ACCOUNTANTS; JOHN DEAKER; JOHN CAMPBELL; DAVID HEWITT; GERALD TEO; J. HAYES, Mrs.; M. GARNETT, Mrs.; D. BARTON; J. HILL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-96-61-5-V) Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony J. Rankine, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornelius Landreth,Hugh Davis North, III, HARRISON, NORTH, COOKE & LANDRETH, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Anthony J. Rankine appeals the district court’s order dismissing, following remand, his civil action on forum non conveniens grounds. We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Rankine v. Rankine , No. CA-96-61-5-V (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant’s petition for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Rodger DUBOSE, Defendant.

No. COA16-169

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR.
# Official Journal C 4A/7 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 4A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 487 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 4A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 487 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 004A/1 | Vacancy notice for the CDE | 1 |
| 2005/C 004A/2 | Vacancy notice for the CTA | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Council

2005/C 004A/1

Vacancy notice for the CDE

1

2005/C 004A/2

Vacancy notice for the CTA

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Aly
      Musani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
      knowledge that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.








/s/
      ALY
      MUSANI


Aly
      Musani


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      6,
      2006
Exhibit 99

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC

Arthur
Andersen LLP has audited the consolidated financial statements of BroadVision, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended and have issued
their report thereon dated March 29, 2002. Andersen has represented to BroadVision, Inc. that its audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the
audit, availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

---
Kevin NUNN (as an individual and as doing business as Bear Creek Log Homes), Plaintiff v. Natalie BARO, Defendant

No. COA 17-798

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 6, 2018

NO ERROR.
# L_2009046EN.01007901.xml

| 17.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 46/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 46/79

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 77/2009 of 26 January 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 23 of 27 January 2009
  )

Official Journal of the European Union L 23 of 27 January 2009

| — | On page 8, Annex, point 24, |
| --- | --- |

—

On page 8, Annex, point 24,

for:

‘Date of designation referred to in Article 7(2): 16.6.2005’,

read:

‘Date of designation referred to in Article 7(2): 27.1.2009’;

| — | on page 15, Annex, point 122, |
| --- | --- |

—

on page 15, Annex, point 122,

for:

‘Function/Reason for listing; Identifying data: Assistant Inspector Zimbabwe National Army.’,

read:

‘Function/Reason for listing; Identifying data: Assistant Zimbabwe Republic Police.’

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie James LANGLEY

No. 221PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, For Langley, Willie James.

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, For State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 6th of July 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of July 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Marc MALECEK v. Derek WILLIAMS

No. 341P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Jason Scott Smith, Attorney at Law, for Malecek, Marc.

Joslin Davis, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Kim R. Bonuomo, Bennett D. Rainey, Attorneys at Law, for Williams, Derek.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 10th of October 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the
Company) for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Gottwald               
|    |  | Thomas E. Gottwald                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | August 1, 2006                       



42
STATE of North Carolina v. Delgen FOYE

No. 236P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Foye, Delgen.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Delgen Foye, for Foye, Delgen.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."