alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Jamel GRIFFIN

No. COA17-195

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED FOR NEW RESTITUTION HEARING.
# Official Journal L 24/27 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 24 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4927 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 24

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4927 January 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 108/2006 of 11 January 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 1, 4, 6 and 7, International Accounting Standards (IAS) 1, 14, 17, 32, 33, and 39, International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee's (IFRIC) Interpretation 6 (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 108/2006 of 11 January 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 1, 4, 6 and 7, International Accounting Standards (IAS) 1, 14, 17, 32, 33, and 39, International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee's (IFRIC) Interpretation 6 (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STRAITE v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

407P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Sheldon Straite, for Straite, Sheldon.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC Department of Public Safety.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of November 2017 by Plaintiff for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
In the MATTER OF: E.C., A.C.

No. COA17-57

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
Ex 10(a)1 q1 2013 10-Q






Exhibit 10(a)1


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


THE SOUTHERN COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2013, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Southern Company (the “Company”) and certain other executive officers of the Company who served during 2012.




	
			
	Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	$1,587,750
	 

	Art P. Beattie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$647,594
	 

	Charles D. McCrary
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power Company
	$803,247
	 

	W. Paul Bowers
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power Company
	$764,406
	 

	Stephen E. Kuczynski
President and Chief Executive Officer, Southern Nuclear
	$661,775
STATE v. Jerry Giovani THOMPSON

24A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 19, 2018

Erik R. Zimmerman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Thompson, Jerry.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of January 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of January 2018."
Exhibit 10.3--Notice of Grant of Stock Options




	
		
	Notice of Grant of Stock Options
and Option Agreement
	Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
ID: 84-0846841
1625 Sharp Point Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525 
(970) 221-4670 






	
			
	FIRST_NAME   LAST_NAME
ADDRESS
 
	Grant Number:
Plan:
ID: 
	 








You have been granted an option to purchase Common Stock of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (the Company), subject to the terms and conditions in the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement, as follows:


	
		
	Date of Grant:
	 

	 
	 

	Exercise Price Per Share:
	 

	 
	 

	Total Number of Shares Granted:
	 

	 
	 

	Total Option Price:
	 

	 
	 

	Type of Option:
	 

	 
	 

	Expiration Date of Option:
	 






Shares in each period will become fully vested on the date shown.


	
			
	 
	Shares
	Vest Date








These options are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Company's Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the Option Agreement, all of which are attached and made a part of this document. 
 
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6667-9]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings 
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published 
in FR dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815).

Draft EISs

    EIS No. 20050319, ERP No. D-FTA-J53006-UT, Mid-Jordan Transit 
Corridor Project, Proposed Light Rail Transit Service, Funding, Salt 
Lake County, UT.
    Summary: EPA has environmental concerns with the proposed project 
due to the impacts of noise and vibration on residents living in close 
proximately to the proposed light rail line and associated train 
stations. EPA anticipates that more information regarding the 
mitigation of these impacts will be provided in the FEIS. Rating EC2.
    EIS No. 20050321, ERP No. D-USA-D11038-PA, Pennsylvania Army 
National Guard's 56th Brigade Transformation into a Stryker Brigade 
Combat Team (SBCT) , Proposal to Comply with this Directive, near 
Annville, PA.
    Summary: EPA expressed concern related to wetland, air quality 
PM10, noise and forest habitat impacts. EPA requested addition 
information and mitigation of these issues. Rating EC2.

Final EISs

    EIS No. 20050324, ERP No. F-FRA-E40799-FL, Florida High Speed Rail, 
Tampa to Orlando, Transportation Improvement, NPDES Permit and U.S. 
Army COE Section 404 Permit, Hillsborough, Orange Osceola , and Polk 
Counties, FL.
    Summary: While strongly supporting the proposed project, EPA 
continues to have environmental concerns related primarily to noise and 
vibration impacts. EPA also has concerns regarding the borrow areas 
utilized for fill material as well as impacts to wildlife. EPA 
recommends that environmental mitigation be further addressed in the 
ROD and subsequent permitting.
    EIS No. 20050332, ERP No. F-AFS-L65449-AK, Couverden Timer Sales, 
Harvesting Timber, NPDES, Coast Guard Bridge Permit, U.S. Army COE 
Section 10 and 404 Permits, Tongass National Forest, Juneau Ranger 
District, Chilkat Peninsula, AK.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

    Dated: September 27, 2005.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05-19605 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, WILLIAM
P. HANKOWSKY, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in
connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, that based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ WILLIAM P. HANKOWSKY
------------------------
William P. Hankowsky
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 11, 2005
State of North Carolina v. Billy Eugene Bradley

No. COA16-177

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

NO ERROR.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2008 – Vitro Corporativo v OHIM – VKR Holding (Vitro)**

**(Case T-412/06)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark Vitro – Earlier Community word mark VITRAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 23, 31)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 October 2006 (Case R 1364/2005-2) concerning opposition proceedings between VKR Holding A/S and Vitro Corporativo, SA de CV. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Vitro Corporativo, SA de CV |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark Vitro for goods and services in Classes 1, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 30, 35, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 – Application No 2669521 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | VKR Holding A/S |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Danish word mark No 19561415 VR, German word mark No 725452, British word mark No 1436897 and Community word mark No 651745 VITRAL, for goods, inter alia, in Class 19, against which the opposition is brought |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld; application for Community mark dismissed for goods in Class 19 |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Vitro Corporativo, SA de CV to pay the costs. |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
        connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 31, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
        to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




/s/
                MARK GUSTAFSONMark
                GustafsonPresident
                (Principal Executive Officer)


March
          6,
          2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 420 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 420

 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2013

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Shimkus, Mrs. Wagner, 
and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri, to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Memorial 
Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Memorial Bridge''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Andwele Willie EAVES

No. COA17-159

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21

                        PennFed Financial Services, Inc.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Percentage         State
                                                                                   of        of Incorporation
             Parent                               Subsidiary                    Ownership     or Organization
--------------------------------        -------------------------               ----------   ----------------
<S>                                     <C>                                        <C>        <C>
PennFed Financial Services, Inc.        Penn Federal Savings Bank                  100%       United States

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.        PennFed Capital Trust II                   100%       Delaware

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.        PennFed Capital Trust III                  100%       Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank               Penn Savings Insurance Agency, Inc.        100%       New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank               Ferry Development Holding Co.              100%       Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank               Eagle Rock Investment Corp.                100%       New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank               PennFed Title Service Corporation          100%       New Jersey
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-282-CV

ELIZABETH ANN ALLMOND	APPELLANT

	V.

LOE, WARREN, ROSENFIELD,	APPELLEES

KAITCER, HIBBS & WINDSOR, P.C. 

AND MARK J. ROSENFIELD

	------------

	FROM THE 322ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Elizabeth Ann Allmond (“Elizabeth”) and Larry Wayne Allmond (“Larry”) were divorced in November 2005.  Elizabeth later complained to her attorneys, Loe, Warren, Rosenfield, Kaitcer, Hibbs & Windsor, P.C. (“Loe Warren”) that Larry was not remitting assets as provided in the decree.  On Elizabeth’s behalf, Loe Warren filed a motion for enforcement of agreed final decree of divorce, which was served on Larry.  Stating that Elizabeth had not paid attorneys’ fees, Loe Warren simultaneously filed a motion to withdraw as attorney of record, which the trial court later granted.  Loe Warren then intervened in the enforcement action, seeking to recover fees from Elizabeth. 

	After a June 2007 bench trial, the trial court entered a “Final Judgment” awarding Loe Warren unpaid attorneys’ fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees for the action to recover fees from Elizabeth.  Notably, Larry is not mentioned in this judgment, and the record does not reflect any appearance by Larry or resolution of Elizabeth’s enforcement action against him.

	Elizabeth appealed, arguing that Loe Warren’s intervention in the enforcement action was invalid and that the trial court never obtained jurisdiction over Loe Warren’s attorneys’ fees claims.  We do not reach Elizabeth’s arguments because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal.

	Absent a statute expressly conferring appellate jurisdiction, interlocutory orders are not appealable.2  Here, the underlying action is a motion to enforce a divorce decree filed by Elizabeth against Larry.  Chapter 9 of the Family Code authorizes such actions and provides that, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this chapter, a suit to enforce shall be governed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to the filing of an original lawsuit.”3  Moreover, when all parties who may be affected by the enforcement action have been properly served, “the proceedings shall be as in civil cases generally.”4  Accordingly, like interlocutory orders “in civil cases generally,” interlocutory orders in an enforcement action are appealable only if expressly permitted by statute.5

	Based on the record presented, the “Final Judgment” adjudicating Loe Warren’s claims against Elizabeth is interlocutory because it does not dispose of all parties and all issues in the enforcement action.6  The record reflects no resolution of Elizabeth’s claims against Larry.  Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, which we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.  We express no opinion on the merits of Elizabeth’s appeal.7

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 16, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adera Mines Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Slavko Bebek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 16th day of September, 2005.



| | /s/ Slavko Bebek                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Slavko Bebek                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
Denied; Opinion Filed August 21, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00911-CV

IN RE A.P. AND D. P., INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR K.D.P., A MINOR, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 102717-CC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Myers

Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have our Court vacate 

the trial court’s July 24, 2019 temporary orders and compel the trial court to return their child, 

K.D.P., to their custody. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court 

has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re 

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After 

reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled 

to the relief requested.
–2–

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). 

190911F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
#### Diane BREAUX, Wife of and Joseph Breaux v. AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC. (Formerly Avondale Shipyards, Inc.) and Its Executive Officers, Steven Kennedy and Peter Terito; Texaco, Inc.; Eagle, Inc. (Formerly Eagle Asbestos *&*Packing Company); The Mccarty Corporation; Reilly-Benton, Inc.; et al.

Nos. 2003-C-1009, 2003-C-1055, 2003-C-1064.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

*618In re Reilly-Benton Company, Ine.; Kennedy, Steven, Territo, Peter; Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Avondale Industries, Inc.; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated June 20, 2003; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court. Division “A” No. 2001-5871; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-CA-1713.

Reconsideration denied.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2730

LT Case No. 2015-CF-4140-A 

_____________________________

VICTOR REED,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.853 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Jeb Branham, Judge. 

Deana Marshall, of Law Office of Deana K. Marshall, P.A., 

Riverview, for Appellant. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 CEO Certification

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Rodolfo Prieto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|/s/ Rodolfo Prieto      |  |  |  | Date: November 7, 2008
|Rodolfo Prieto          |  |  |  |                       
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |