alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 347/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.347.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 347 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5514 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.347.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 347

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5514 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 347/01 | Final accounts of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2011 | 1 |
| 2012/C 347/02 | The Court’s Statement of Assurance on the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) to the European Parliament and the Council — Independent Auditor’s Report | 267 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 347/01

Final accounts of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2011

1

2012/C 347/02

The Court’s Statement of Assurance on the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) to the European Parliament and the Council — Independent Auditor’s Report

267

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4230 

To limit the retirement of KC–10 aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. RUNYAN (for himself and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To limit the retirement of KC–10 aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF KC–10 AIR4 CRAFT. 

5 (a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to 

6 be appropriated or otherwise made available for the De7 partment of Defense may be obligated or expended to re8 tire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any KC–10 air9 craft until each of the following occurs: 

10 (1) The Secretary of the Air Force certifies to 

11 the congressional defense committees each of the fol12 lowing: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4230 IH

1 (A) The four KC–46A test aircraft are all 

2 built and fully operational including their air 

3 refueling capability. 

4 (B) The initial 18 KC–46A aircraft have 

5 been delivered to the Air Force in a fully oper6 ational capacity by 2017. 

7 (C) The KC–46A aircraft has achieved full 

8 operational capability. 

9 (D) A sufficient number of KC–46A air10 craft exists in the inventory of the Air Force to 

11 fully meet the air refueling and cargo support 

12 capability and mission requirements of the com13 batant commands. 

14 (2) The Comptroller General of the United 

15 States submits to the congressional defense commit16 tees a report setting forth the following: 

17 (A) An assessment whether each certifi18 cation under paragraph (1) is comprehensive, 

19 fully supported, and sufficiently detailed. 

20 (B) An identification of any shortcomings, 

21 limitations, or other reportable matters that af22 fect the quality or findings of any certification 

23 under paragraph (1). 

24 (b) DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF COMPTROLLER

25 GENERAL REPORT.—The report of the Comptroller GenVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:41 Mar 20, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4230.IH H4230

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4230 IH

1 eral under paragraph (2) of subsection (a) shall be sub2 mitted not later than 90 days after the date of the submis3 sion of the certification referred to in paragraph (1) of 

4 such subsection. 

5 (c) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE6 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

7 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

8 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. Terrence Lowell HYMAN

245A08-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2017

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hyman, Terrence Lowell.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of December 2017 by State of NC to Amend Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2017."
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME ROQUES-JUAREZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72722 

Agency No. A206-784-500 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 8, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jaime Roques-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of 

removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo 

questions of law. Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 491 (9th Cir. 2008). We 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72722 

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that 

Roques-Juarez did not demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship in 

his application for cancellation of removal, and Roques-Juarez does not raise a 

colorable question of law that would invoke our jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 

2003) (“[A]n ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship’ determination is a 

subjective, discretionary judgment that has been carved out of our appellate 

jurisdiction.”). Because the hardship determination is dispositive, we do not reach 

Roques-Juarez’s contentions regarding the remaining factors for eligibility for 

cancellation of removal. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 

2004) (the courts and the agency are not required to make findings on issues the 

decision of which is unnecessary to the results).

Roques-Juarez’s contentions that the IJ improperly denied voluntary 

departure and failed to inform him of his apparent eligibility for this relief are not 

supported because the record shows that he did not apply for voluntary departure.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First State Financial Corporation (the Company), each certify that, to such officers knowledge on the date of this
certification:



| | (a) | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Corey J. Coughlin                
|                  |  |     |  | Corey J. Coughlin                    
|                  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |    
|Date: May 4, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis Grinsteiner               
|                  |  |     |  | Dennis Grinsteiner                   
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer              



18
----

(2004/C 88 E/0663)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3380/03

by Christos Zacharakis (PPE-DE) and Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Representations to the Egyptian authorities to implement the principles of democracy and the protection of human rights

In 1989 the Egyptian Government arrested in Suez and sentenced to death three Greek seamen from the ‘Thanassis’ on charges of smuggling, even though their guilt was never proven. After pressure from prominent European personalities, these sentences were later commuted to life imprisonment.

This affair received widespread media coverage, and many Greek radio and television programmes were broadcast on the subject. A book was also published describing the unwarranted sentences handed down on them and the wretched conditions of detention in Egyptian prisons. Two of the three seamen have already died in Egyptian prisons, while the third, Konstantinos Kastanias, is seriously ill and is slowly dying in al-Qanatir prison.

The European Parliament has repeatedly expressed the need to strengthen democracy in Egypt (Resolutions P5_TA(2002)0378, P5_TA(2002)0410) and has referred to the specific case of the wretched conditions of detention of Konstantinos Kastanias, calling on the Egyptian authorities to permit him to be transferred to Greece on humanitarian grounds (Resolution P5_TA-PROV(2003)0192, 10.4.2003). It will also be recalled that Article 2 of the Cooperation Agreement between Egypt and the European Union calls for respect for human rights and the principles of democracy and that Commissioner Chris Patten made a statement before the plenary of the European Parliament on 5 September 2002 urging Egypt to adopt the highest judicial and democratic standards if is to achieve its developmental and political ambitions. Particularly in view of its cooperation with Egypt and the above statement, will the Commission say what immediate measures it intends to take to prevail upon Egypt to heed the European Parliament's request and allow Konstantinos Kastanias who is dying to be transferred to Greece, in accordance with the above European Parliament Resolution P5_TA-prov(2003)0192 of 10.4.2003?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(11 December 2003)

The Commission is aware of the detention of Mr Konstantinos Kastanias in an Egyptian prison for drug trafficking and his sentence to death (subsequently commuted to life imprisonment). The Commission is aware that on humanitarian grounds, the Egyptian authorities in 1996 repatriated Mr Nikos Zagelidis, one of two other persons charged with the same sentence.

The Commission is following this case and has been in contact with the Greek and the Egyptian authorities.

The Commission is prepared to support any further diplomatic effort by Greece or by the Union Presidency for the transfer on humanitarian grounds of Mr Kastanias to Greece by virtue of the existing bilateral agreement on the exchange of detainees.

----
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CFO OF PERIODIC REPORT**     The undersigned, Timothy A. Bienek, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofAffirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of hisknowledge, that:(1) the Interim Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.Dated: November 14, 2005       /s/ Timothy A. Bienek         Timothy A. Bienek    Executive Vice President and Chief    Financial Officer (Principal Financial    Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4320 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act with respect to the timing 

of elections and pre-election hearings and the identification of pre-election 

issues. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Mr. KLINE (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

PRICE of Georgia, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. SALMON, Mr. 

DESJARLAIS, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. GOWDY, Mrs. BROOKS of 

Indiana, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. MESSER, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. RIBBLE, and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act with respect 

to the timing of elections and pre-election hearings and 

the identification of pre-election issues. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workforce Democracy 

5 and Fairness Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4320 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRE-ELECTION HEARINGS. 

2 Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations 

3 Act (29 U.S.C. 159(c)(1)(B)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘, but in no circumstances less 

5 than 14 calendar days after the filing of the peti6 tion’’ after ‘‘upon due notice’’; 

7 (2) by inserting after ‘‘with respect thereto.’’ 

8 the following: ‘‘An appropriate hearing shall be one 

9 that is non-adversarial with the hearing officer 

10 charged, in collaboration with the parties, with the 

11 responsibility of identifying any relevant and mate12 rial pre-election issues and thereafter making a full 

13 record thereon. Relevant and material pre-election 

14 issues shall include, in addition to unit appropriate15 ness, the Board’s jurisdiction and any other issue 

16 the resolution of which may make an election unnec17 essary or which may reasonably be expected to im18 pact the outcome of the election. Parties may inde19 pendently raise any relevant and material pre-elec20 tion issue or assert any relevant and material posi21 tion at any time prior to the close of the hearing.’’; 

22 and 

23 (3) by striking ‘‘and shall certify the results 

24 thereof’’ and inserting ‘‘to be conducted as soon as 

25 practicable but no earlier than 35 calendar days 

26 after the filing of an election petition. The Board 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4320 IH

1 shall certify the results of the election after it has 

2 ruled on each pre-election issue not resolved before 

3 the election and any additional issue pertaining to 

4 the conduct or results of the election’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20685 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GRATINIANO TOVAR-VALENCIA, also known as Carlos Alberto Ramirez-Hurtado, also known as Daniel Gonzalez Velazquez, also known as Grati, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gratiniano Tovar-Valencia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Tovar-Valencia has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Tovar-Valencia’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, andNo. -2- Tovar-Valencia’s APPEAL is DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Jon D. Van Deuren, Chief Financial Officer of Aames Investment Corporation certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aames Investment Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s 

auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: August 15, 2005: 

/s/ Jon D. Van Deuren

Jon D. Van Deuren

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Tom J. Fatjo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:
              /s/ Tom
      J. Fatjo, Jr.Tom
      J. Fatjo, Jr.Chief
      Executive OfficerOctober
      30, 2009







The
foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
In the Matter of: O.D.S.

No. 259P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Stone, Nicholas Adam.

Carol J. Holcomb, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Orange County DSS.

Amanda L. Groves, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for GAL.

Samantha H. Cabe, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Kobi Kennedy Brinson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of July 2016 by Respondent (Father) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Honeywell International, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63636

)

Under Contract No. 00000

- 00

- 0

- 0000 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Nicole J. Owren

- Wiest, Esq.

Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

William M. Tucker, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 16, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63636

, Appeal of Honeywell

International, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 16, 2024 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
ELI GLOBAL, LLC, et al. v. HEAVNER

12PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 18, 2017

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Kendal B. Reed, Attorney at Law, for Eli Global, LLC, et al.

James H. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Richard M. Hutson, II, Attorney at Law, Durham, Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for Heavner, James A.

Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, Timothy Nelson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Association of Broadcasters, et al.

Stuart M. Paynter, Attorney at Law, Celeste H. G. Boyd, Attorney at Law, Hillsborough, for Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of May 2017 by Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of May 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).