alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011269EN.01004301.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — Trade-Stomil v Commission

(Case T-53/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Participation in the cartel - Imputability of the offending conduct - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances)

2011/C 269/94

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trade-Stomil sp. z o.o. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: F. Carlin, Barrister, and E. Batchelor, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: X. Lewis and V. Bottka, and subsequently by V. Bottka and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, so far as Trade-Stomil sp. z o.o. is concerned, of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber) or, in the alternative, annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on Trade-Stomil.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber) in so far as it concerns Trade-Stomil sp. z o.o.; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber) in so far as it concerns Trade-Stomil sp. z o.o.;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
#### William T. MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2336.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 26, 2003.

William T. Murphy, Bonifay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Owen v. Crosby,*23, Fla. L. Weekly S615, — So.2d —, 2003 WL 21554960 (Fla. July 11, 2003).

SHARP, W., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 432 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 432

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2013

  Mr. Amodei introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN NEVADA.

    This proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act 
of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Nevada'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 8, 2017

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General.

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, et al.

Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, Anita S. Earls, Attorney at Law, Emily E. Seawell, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of August 2017 by County Board Members Ms. Stella Anderson and Mr. Courtney Patterson for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of August 2017."
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of H. M.O.L., a Child

In the Interest of K.X.J.L., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-17-00775-CV

01-17-00776-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-01564J

2013-06554J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

These appeals involve parental-termination cases. Appellants, G.R.R. and K.X.J.L. 

aka K.L., Sr., filed their briefs on January 8, 2018. The brief of appellee, Department of 

Family & Protective Service (“DFPS”), was due to be filed by January 29, 2018. On 

February 9, 2018, DFPS filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time to March 12, 

2018 to file its brief. We grant the motion in part. DFPS’s brief is due to be filed in 

these appeals no later than Monday, March 5, 2018. No further extensions will be 

granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(b), (c).

Because these appeals involve parental-termination cases, this Court is required to 

bring the appeals to final disposition within 180 days of October 9, 2017, the date the first 

notice of appeal was filed in each appeal, so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. 

Admin. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (Vernon Supp. 

2017).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 13, 2018
STATE of North Carolina v. Ottis MCGILL

No. 428P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, For McGill, Ottis.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Melody R. Hairston, Special Deputy Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of November 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
STATE v. Willie James LANGLEY

221P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 6, 2017

John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Langley, Willie James.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of July 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of July 2017."
STATE v. Nicolas Olivares PINEDA.

No. 70P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2016.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Pineda, Nicolas Olivares.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill.

Scott T. Stroud, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of March 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of March 2016."
MMC 06.30.2014 10Q Ex_10.2

















Exhibit 10.2


June 11, 2014


Daniel S. Glaser
[Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]


Subject:    Terms of Employment




Dear Dan:


This amendment to the Letter Agreement, dated September 18, 2013, between you and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “2013 Letter Agreement”) revises the terms and conditions of your employment by Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.  The 2013 Letter Agreement will continue to govern your employment, except as specified below, effective as of May 14, 2014:


		
	1.
	Exhibit A to the 2013 Letter Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the attached Exhibit A.




Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter agreement by signing and dating below and the enclosed copy and returning one executed document to me on or before June 25, 2014.


Sincerely,




/s/ H. Edward Hanway
H. Edward Hanway
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.






Accepted and Agreed:




/s/ Daniel S. Glaser            
(Signature)        




June 13, 2014                
(Date)















June 11, 2014
Daniel S. Glaser
Page 2




Exhibit A




 
	
		
	Board or Committee Memberships
	•    International Advisory Board of BritishAmerican Business
•    Board of Trustees of the American Institute for Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters
•    Insurance Information Institute
•    Board of Trustees of Ohio Wesleyan University

	Annual Base Salary
	$1,400,000

	Annual Target Bonus Opportunity
	Bonus awards are discretionary.  Anticipated target bonus of $2,800,000 commencing with the 2013 performance year (awarded in 2014).  Actual bonus may range from 0% - 200% of target, based on achievement of individual performance objectives, and/or Marsh & McLennan Companies’ performance as Marsh & McLennan Companies may establish from time to time.

	Annual Target Long Term Incentive Opportunity
	Long-term incentive awards are discretionary.  Anticipated target grant date fair value of $8,000,000, commencing with the award made in 2015.

	Other Benefits
	•    You will have access to a car and driver for business purposes and for work/home travel purposes.


•    You will have access to corporate aircraft for personal travel, up to $100,000 in aggregate incremental cost each calendar year as calculated by the Company for disclosure purposes for the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s Proxy Statement; provided that this amount and calculation methodology will be reviewed from time to time and subject to adjustment to reflect market trends.  The Company currently calculates incremental cost by adding the incremental variable costs associated with personal flights on the aircraft (including hourly charges, taxes, passenger fees, international fees and catering).


If the imputed income attributable to these benefits is taxable to you, then the taxes associated with this taxable income will not be reimbursed or paid by the Company.
# Official Journal C 4A/9 Ja

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 4A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 589 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 4A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 589 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Systemic Risk Board |
| 2015/C 004A/01 | Call for expressions of interest for 12 external experts to be appointed as members of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Systemic Risk Board

2015/C 004A/01

Call for expressions of interest for 12 external experts to be appointed as members of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Howell v. N.C. Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

326P15-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Burl Anderson Howell, for Howell, Burl Anderson.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, E.B. Borden Parker, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of October 2016 by Petitioner for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
State of North Carolina v. Timothy Devon King

No. 448P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, Timothy Devon King, for King, Timothy Devon.

*217Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of December 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
# Official Journal L 308/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 308 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5024 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 308

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5024 November 2007

---

| Contents | | III   Acts adopted under the EU Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY |
| | * | Council Common Position 2007/750/CFSP of 19 November 2007 amending Common Position 2006/318/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar | 1 |

Contents

III   Acts adopted under the EU Treaty

page

ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY

*

Council Common Position 2007/750/CFSP of 19 November 2007 amending Common Position 2006/318/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
----

Lists for the determination of the composition of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Chambers as from 11 October 2005

(2005/C 281/02)

At its meeting on 11 October 2005, the Court drew up the lists referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the determination of the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Fourth Chamber

Ms Colneric

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Mr Lenaerts

Mr Juhász

Mr Ilešič

Mr Levits

Fifth Chamber

Mr Gulmann

Mr Schintgen

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Kūris

Mr Arestis

Mr Klučka

Sixth Chamber

Mr La Pergola

Mr Puissochet

Mr von Bahr

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Lõhmus

Mr Ó Caoimh

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bradley M. Colby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





May 13, 2011





/s/ Bradley M. ColbyBradley M. ColbyPresident and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4323 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4323

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 
U.S.C. 14135) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``2010 through 
                2018'' and inserting ``2014 through 2019''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``2018'' and 
                inserting ``2019''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2009 through 2014'' 
        and inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION.

    Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (42 
U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking ``2009 through 2014'' and 
inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS.

    Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (42 
U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking ``2009 through 2014'' and 
inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


 


ProPhase
Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby adopts this Amendment (this “Amendment”)
to the Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the ‘Plan”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Company’s Compensation Committee adopted the Plan and the Board of Directors (the “Board”) ratified the
Plan;


 


WHEREAS, the
Plan was submitted to and ratified by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on
May 5, 2010;


 


WHEREAS, the
Plan currently provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Company Stock”)
that may be issued or transferred under the Plan is 1,800,000 shares;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Company Stock that may be issued under the Plan by 700,000
shares to a total of 2,500,000 shares of Company Stock; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 11 of the Plan, the Company may amend the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.           The
first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“Subject
to this Section 3 and Section 7 of the Plan, the total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is equal to 1,600,000
plus a maximum of 900,000 Shares available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date.”


 


2.           Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
ProPhase Labs, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the effective date written above.


 


 





	 	PROPHASE LABS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert
V. Cuddihy, Jr.
	 	Name:	Robert
V. Cuddihy, Jr.
	 	Title:	Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
	 	Date:	May 6,
2013
. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Mdr.~ Rail H. Logan, Acting Director PostvrarZconomic Austin 1.1, Texas Flannlng Commission
Dear Mr. Logan: Oplnlon No. 

### O-6769 Re: TheLegislature has not authorWehave given of August 2, 

### 1945.
ization and render usan of these fu would be c of ,the Sta ThePostwar Ecos been designated. by the Federal Act, as rove such applications.

ar Eoonomic Planning Co&nlssion, authorized Resolution No. 

### 33,passed bythe Legislaauthorized the Governor to appoint thirtymbe& -of said Commission; said Resolution does not, however, authorize or psrmit said Commission to accept any funds from thg Federal Government; neither does it authorize said Commission.to in anywaybind the state of Texas in any kind of a contract,. Mr. Hall B. Logan, Page 2

. Section 9of the general provisions to the Appropriation Act passed in 1945 is the sameas Section 20 of the 1943Appropriation Act. It reads as follower

v(9) United States Funds andAid. The‘pioper officer or officers of any State Departments, bureaus, or divisions of State agencies are hereby authorized to makeapplication for and accept any gifts, grants, ox allotments or funds from the i United States Government, educational or health projects and program, etc., to be used on State coope.rative and other Fedora1 projects and programs in Texas, inoluding construction of publia buildings, repairs, and inprovemnts. Anyof such funds as maybe deposited in the State Treasury am hereby appropriated to~.tha specific purpose authorized by the grantor, and subject to the lirni.+;at$on plaoed on this A&.“’ There are no other provisions in our statutes that oould in anywayaffect the quostioti you have asked. Congress,~ of couxse, cannot pass any kinaof axiact that would authorize any agencies in Texas or elsowhare to nako,contracts that would bind Texas~. It is fundamntal law that no ono oan make a’contract binding the State, unioss the Loglslatura has &Ivan that tierson or agonoy spoclfio authority. :

It is our opinion that neither the Postwar Eoonomio Planning Commission nor any other Stata agency has any power or authority to accept fu11d.sfrora the Fedora1 Governmnt undsr “tha WarMobilization and Reoonverslon Act of 1944” and bind the Stats to repsy same. of said Act reads: Asstated, by you, Section 501(o)

Wdvances under this section to any public .~ agency shall be repaid by such agonoy if endwhen the construction Oftho public worka so planned Is undertaken. Any sum so repaid shall be OOverod into tbs Treasury as misoellaneous receipts.“

. Under the quoted section of the Aot of Gongross any pub110agency which contracted viit.h the Federal Government, andaqxptod any funds under and in virtue of the Act, would be compelled to makea contract with tho lz’ederal Government. ‘

.

Mr. Hall H. Logan, Page 3

. 9' that sag money80 advanoed would be repaid to ths stats of Texas .?$f andwhenthe construction of the public works so planned is undertaken. tr Very truly yours ATCIDRI'EY

GiSNERAL

OFTEXAS

Geo. W. Ewcug Assistant