alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,768
<PP&E>                                       7,115,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,726,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,477,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,477,771
<SALES>                                        595,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               602,857
<CGS>                                          212,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  541,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC.


2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







NOTICE OF GRANT AND STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT















 





	
Name:

	  	  	
Option Number:

	  
	
Address:

	  	  	
Employee ID:

	  
	  	  	  	  	  





Effective __________, 20__,  (“Grant Date”), you have been granted [incentive/non-qualified] stock option to purchase ___________( ________) shares of 1st Century Bancshares, Inc. common stock at an Exercise Price of $ ______ per share pursuant to the 1st Century Bancshares, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Except as otherwise defined herein, terms with initial capital letters shall have the same meanings set forth in the Plan.  A copy of the Plan is attached to this Notice and Agreement.  The terms and conditions of the Plan are incorporated herein by this reference.


 


[Insert vesting schedule]


 


By accepting this grant and exercising any portion of the Option, you represent that you: (i) agree to the terms and conditions of this Notice and Agreement and the Plan; (ii) have reviewed the Plan and the Notice and Agreement in their entirety, and have had an opportunity to obtain the advice of legal counsel and/or your tax advisor with respect thereto; (iii) fully understand and accept all provisions hereof; (iv) agree to accept as binding, conclusive, and final all of the Administrator’s decisions regarding, and all interpretations of, the Plan and the Notice and Agreement; and (v) agree to notify the Company upon any change in your home address indicated above.  


 


Please return a signed copy of this Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement to [insert contact name and address of the Bank], and retain a copy for your records.


 


 


__________________________________Dated:_______________________


 


For 1st Century Bancshares, Inc:


[insert name]


[insert title]












Agreed to this ____ day of _________, 20__.












____________________________________


[Insert name of Optionee]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136702 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136702 

 COA: 278148 
 Wayne CC: 05-004348-01

COREY JUAN BURTON, a/k/a COREY

JJUAN BURTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 21

                        PennFed Financial Services, Inc.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        Percentage             State
                                                                                            of            of Incorporation
Parent                                      Subsidiary                                   Ownership        or Organization
------                                      ----------                                   ---------        ---------------
<S>                                         <C>                                            <C>             <C>
PennFed Financial Services, Inc.            Penn Federal Savings Bank                      100%            United States

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.            PennFed Capital Trust I                        100%            Delaware

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.            PennFed Capital Trust II                       100%            Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank                   Penn Savings Insurance Agency, Inc.            100%            New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank                   Ferry Development Holding Co.                  100%            Delaware
</TABLE>


The financial statements of the Registrant are consolidated with those of its
subsidiaries.
Exhibit 10.3






 


CANCELLATION
OF PROMISSORY NOTE


 


July
10, 2014,


 


The
note due to Wall-Street.com LLC dated March 4, 2014, as was filed in the preceding 8K is hereby by cancelled and accepted by
Wall-Street.com LLC. An agreement has been reached with wall-street.com LLC and the majority shareholders, and the board of
directors of Wall Street Media Co, Inc. to cancel the debt without further obligation. Any claims to the domain will be
released free and clear of any and all liens or encumbrances. No penalties were assessed, and no issues of ownership remain.
The corporation is hereby relieved of the debt, and the forgiveness of the promissory note.


 


	 	Wall-Street.com LLC
	 	 	
	 	By	Jerrold Burden/
STATE v. Jerry Giovani THOMPSON

24A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 5, 2018

Erik R. Zimmerman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Thompson, Jerry.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of March 2018 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of March 2018."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 9th day of April 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1980/2005

of 5 December 2005         

amending the conditions for authorisation of a feed additive belonging to the group of trace elements and of a feed additive belonging to the group of binders and anti-caking agents

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular the third sentence of Article 13(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   In Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003, the words ‘maximum content of lead: 600 mg/kg’ are deleted from the entry in the Annex concerning zinc.

2.   In Regulation (EC) No 2148/2004, the words ‘maximum lead content: 80 mg/kg’ are deleted from the entry in the Annex concerning clinoptilolite of volcanic origin.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force 12 months after the entry into force of Commission Directive 2005/87/EC.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005 (OJ L 59, 5.3.2005, p. 8).

(2)OJ L 187, 26.7.2003, p. 11. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2112/2003 (OJ L 317, 2.12.2003, p. 22).

(3)OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 24.

(4)OJ L 140, 30.5.2002, p. 10. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2005/8/EC (OJ L 27, 29.1.2005, p. 44).

(5)  See page 19 of this Official Journal.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 43 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 585
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 H. R. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 13, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, as the 
             ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER TOMMY DECKER MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 585

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                H. R. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14 Red River Avenue North in Cold Spring, Minnesota, as the 
             ``Officer Tommy Decker Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
(109 So. 843)

No. 25912.

#### WM. H. SMITH, Jr., v. M. F. HINTON.

(Oct. 5, 1926.)

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Bienville; J. E. Reynolds, Judge.

Richardson & Atkins, of Homer, B. F. Barnette, of Arcadia, and S. D. Pearce, of Ruston, for appellant.

J. Rush Wimberly, of Arcadia, for appellee.

BRUNOT, J.

This is a suit upon two notes aggregating $6,200, which were given in connection with two chattel mortgages on live stock and road building implements. Plaintiff sequestered the property mortgaged. The defendant admits the execution of the notes and mortgages, but reconvened and pleaded set-off and compensation. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in all respects as prayed for in the petition and nonsuiting the defendant as to his reconventional demand, the defendant appealed.

The case was submitted without argument; there is no application in the record for time within which to file briefs, and no briefs have been filed by either party to the appeal.

We have read the transcript carefully. Five witnesses gave oral testimony in the case. Four of these, including the defendant himself, took the stand in his behalf. It is not .necessary to review their testimony because it utterly fails to support the defendant’s re-conventional demand or to establish any indebtedness whatever by plaintiff to the defendant. The only attempt by defendant was to show that plaintiff was indebted to him on an open account for some unnamed and uncertain sum as compensation and offset to the notes and mortgages sued upon. The failure of the. *1077proof offered to establish the fact alleged in the reeonventional demand renders it unnecessary for ns to pass on the lower court’s rulings admitting this testimony and referring counsel’s objections to it to the effect to be given it. The judgment appealed from is correct, and it is therefore affirmed, at appellant’s cost.
STATE of North Carolina v. Darrell Lee MELTON

No. COA16-1088

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

NO ERROR.
#### POINTE ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 76-1509.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1977.

R. Ian Hunter, James D. Osmer, Matheson, Bieneman, Parr, Schuler & Ewald, C. John Holmquist, Jr., Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for petitioner.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent.

Before LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges, and NEESE, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable C. G. Neese, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

ORDER

This case is before the court on petition of Pointe Enterprises, Inc., the employer, to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) issued on April 9, 1976 based on a finding that the employer had violated Sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Labor Act by refusing to bargain with a duly certified union. The Board’s order is reported at 223 NLRB No. 93 and is based in part on findings made in a representation proceeding under Section 9 of the Act. See 216 NLRB No. 131. The issue is whether the “laboratory conditions” were destroyed by assertions by the union during the campaign relating to its intentions in the event it won the election. The Board, with one member dissenting, found in the representation proceeding that the statements made by the union were not misrepresentations within the meaning of *Hollywood Ceramics Company, Inc.,*140 NLRB 221 (1962).

In this court the employer contends that the case is not controlled by *Hollywood Ceramics,*supra, since the nature of the statements made by the union were such as to constitute an abuse of Board process. *7Though the facts in this case are somewhat different from those in any case cited by the parties, upon consideration of the entire record together with the briefs and oral arguments of counsel the court concludes that the Board did not err in its treatment of the issues in the case. '

The order of the Board is enforced.
# Official Journal L 90/8 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 488 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 90

English edition

Legislation

Volume 488 April 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Directive 2005/25/EC of 14 March 2005 amending Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC as regards plant protection products containing micro-organisms (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Directive 2005/25/EC of 14 March 2005 amending Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC as regards plant protection products containing micro-organisms (1)

1

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 14 March 2005 on the conclusion of the bilateral agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia on trade in textile products | 35 |
| Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia on trade in textile products | 36 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Council

*

Council Decision of 14 March 2005 on the conclusion of the bilateral agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia on trade in textile products

35

Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia on trade in textile products

36

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4315 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4315

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication on 
     the Internet of the basis for determinations that species are 
   endangered species or threatened species, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2014

 Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Amodei, Mr. 
  Bishop of Utah, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Harris, Mr. Huizenga of 
     Michigan, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. 
Southerland, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Valadao) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication on 
     the Internet of the basis for determinations that species are 
   endangered species or threatened species, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Endangered Species 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH ON THE INTERNET THE BASIS FOR LISTINGS.

    Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(9) The Secretary shall make publicly available on the Internet 
the best scientific and commercial data available that are the basis 
for each regulation, including each proposed regulation, promulgated 
under subsection (a)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### J.B. ALLOY CORP., d/b/a Robinson Technical Products, S.W. v. CIGNA INSURANCE OF EUROPE, S.A.-N.V.

No. 2003-CC-1983.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re J.B. Alloy Corp. d/b/a; Robinson Technical Products, S.W.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 30,892; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 2196.

*619Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5.

KIMBALL, J., recused.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 12002E308

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Six: General and Final Provisions - Article 308 - Article 235 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 235 - EEC Treaty***Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0153 - 0153 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0301 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Six: General and Final Provisions

Article 308

Article 235 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 235 - EEC Treaty

Article 308

If action by the Community should prove necessary to attain, in the course of the operation of the common market, one of the objectives of the Community, and this Treaty has not provided the necessary powers, the Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, take the appropriate measures.
ESTATE OF Taylor A. PEYTON, BY AND THROUGH Administrator John PEYTON, and John Peyton, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant.

John Peyton, as Guardian Ad Litem for John Peyton, II, and John Peyton, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. N.C. Department of Transportation, Defendant.

No. COA17-257

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Darrell Lee MELTON

No. 253PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

*484Mr. Matthew Thomas Tulchin, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Ms. Kathryn L. VandeBerg, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Melton, Darrell Lee.

Greg Newman, District Attorney.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
**Section 906 CFO Certification**

** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of ColonyResorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Schaffhauser,Executive Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
    -  The Report fully complies with the requirements     of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
    -  The information contained in the Report fairly     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of     operations of the Company. 

      

  

| /s/Robert Schaffhauser |
|------------------------|

RobertSchaffhauser

ExecutiveVice President of Finance

 

Date:November 5, 2010        

 

 

----