# Official Journal C 120/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 120 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6515 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 120

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6515 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 120/01 | Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements | 1 |
| 2022/C 120/02 | Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements | 9 |
| 2022/C 120/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10625 – CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC) (
  1
  ) | 22 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 120/01

Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements

1

2022/C 120/02

Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements

9

2022/C 120/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10625 – CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC) (
  1
  )

1

22

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 120/04 | Notice for the attention of the entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/932/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/420, and in Council Regulation (EU) 1352/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2022/419 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen | 23 |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 120/05 | Euro exchange rates — 14 March 2022 | 25 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 120/04

Notice for the attention of the entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/932/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/420, and in Council Regulation (EU) 1352/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2022/419 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen

23

European Commission

2022/C 120/05

Euro exchange rates — 14 March 2022

25

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 120/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10644 – TOWERBROOK CAPITAL PARTNERS / NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL / CLOUDMED SOLUTIONS / R1 RCM) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 26 |
| 2022/C 120/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10586 – MGL / MSP / O’CONNOR / MCLAREN RACING) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 28 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 120/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10644 – TOWERBROOK CAPITAL PARTNERS / NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL / CLOUDMED SOLUTIONS / R1 RCM) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

26

2022/C 120/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10586 – MGL / MSP / O’CONNOR / MCLAREN RACING) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

28

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/1

---

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements

(2022/C 120/01)

The Commission has approved the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements on 1 March 2022.

The draft for a Commission Regulation is attached as an Annex to this Communication.

The draft for a Commission Regulation is open to public consultation at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/open.html.

---

ANNEX

DRAFT COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) .../...

of ...

on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 of the Council of 20 December 1971 on application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices (1),

Having published a draft of this Regulation,

After consulting the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (*1) by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object specialisation, including agreements necessary for achieving such specialisation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (*1) by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object specialisation, including agreements necessary for achieving such specialisation.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1218/2010 (2) defines categories of specialisation agreements which the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty. In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2022, and taking into account the results of the review procedure, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1218/2010 (2) defines categories of specialisation agreements which the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty. In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2022, and taking into account the results of the review procedure, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation.

| (3) | This Regulation should meet the two requirements of (i) ensuring effective protection of competition and (ii) providing adequate legal security for undertakings. The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Regulation should meet the two requirements of (i) ensuring effective protection of competition and (ii) providing adequate legal security for undertakings. The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible.

| (4) | Below a certain level of market power it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of specialisation agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Below a certain level of market power it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of specialisation agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition.

| (5) | For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those agreements which are capable of falling within Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In the individual assessment of agreements under Article 101(1) of the Treaty, account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the market structure on the relevant market. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those agreements which are capable of falling within Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In the individual assessment of agreements under Article 101(1) of the Treaty, account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the market structure on the relevant market.

| (6) | The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty.

| (7) | Specialisation agreements are most likely to contribute to improving the manufacture of goods or the preparation of services or their distribution, if the parties have complementary skills, assets or activities, because they can concentrate on the manufacture of those goods or the preparation of those services and thus operate more efficiently and supply the products more cheaply. Given effective competition, it is likely that consumers will receive a fair share of the resulting benefits. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Specialisation agreements are most likely to contribute to improving the manufacture of goods or the preparation of services or their distribution, if the parties have complementary skills, assets or activities, because they can concentrate on the manufacture of those goods or the preparation of those services and thus operate more efficiently and supply the products more cheaply. Given effective competition, it is likely that consumers will receive a fair share of the resulting benefits.

| (8) | Such advantages can arise from: (a) agreements whereby a party or parties fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain goods or the preparation of certain services in favour of another party or parties (‘unilateral specialisation’); (b) agreements whereby each party fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain but different goods or the preparation of certain services in favour of another party or parties (‘reciprocal specialisation’) and (c) agreements whereby two or more parties undertake to jointly manufacture certain goods or prepare certain services (‘joint production’). |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Such advantages can arise from: (a) agreements whereby a party or parties fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain goods or the preparation of certain services in favour of another party or parties (‘unilateral specialisation’); (b) agreements whereby each party fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain but different goods or the preparation of certain services in favour of another party or parties (‘reciprocal specialisation’) and (c) agreements whereby two or more parties undertake to jointly manufacture certain goods or prepare certain services (‘joint production’).

| (9) | The application of this Regulation to services concerns the preparation of services (as opposed to the provision of services). The preparation of services refers to activities upstream of the provision of services to customers (for example, cooperation in the creation of a platform through which a service will be provided). The provision of services falls outside the scope of this Regulation, except in the context of distribution in which the parties provide the services prepared and the products manufactured under the specialisation agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The application of this Regulation to services concerns the preparation of services (as opposed to the provision of services). The preparation of services refers to activities upstream of the provision of services to customers (for example, cooperation in the creation of a platform through which a service will be provided). The provision of services falls outside the scope of this Regulation, except in the context of distribution in which the parties provide the services prepared and the products manufactured under the specialisation agreement.

| (10) | The application of this Regulation to unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should be limited to scenarios where the parties are active on the same product market. However, it is not necessary for the parties to be active on the same geographic market. In addition, the concepts of unilateral and reciprocal specialisation do not require a party to reduce capacity, as it is sufficient if they reduce their production volumes. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The application of this Regulation to unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should be limited to scenarios where the parties are active on the same product market. However, it is not necessary for the parties to be active on the same geographic market. In addition, the concepts of unilateral and reciprocal specialisation do not require a party to reduce capacity, as it is sufficient if they reduce their production volumes.

| (11) | To ensure that the benefits of specialisation will materialise without one party leaving the market downstream of production entirely, unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should only be covered by this Regulation where they provide for supply and purchase obligations. Supply and purchase obligations may, but do not have to, be of an exclusive nature. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

To ensure that the benefits of specialisation will materialise without one party leaving the market downstream of production entirely, unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should only be covered by this Regulation where they provide for supply and purchase obligations. Supply and purchase obligations may, but do not have to, be of an exclusive nature.

| (12) | This Regulation applies to joint production agreements entered into by parties who are already active on the same product market but also by parties who wish to enter a product market by way of the joint production agreement. In addition, the concept of joint production agreement does not require the parties to reduce their individual activities regarding the manufacture of goods or preparation of services outside the scope of their envisaged joint arrangement. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

This Regulation applies to joint production agreements entered into by parties who are already active on the same product market but also by parties who wish to enter a product market by way of the joint production agreement. In addition, the concept of joint production agreement does not require the parties to reduce their individual activities regarding the manufacture of goods or preparation of services outside the scope of their envisaged joint arrangement.

| (13) | It can be presumed that, where the parties’ share of the relevant market for the products which are the subject matter of a specialisation agreement does not exceed a certain level, the agreements will, as a general rule, give rise to economic benefits in the form of economies of scale or scope or better production technologies, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

It can be presumed that, where the parties’ share of the relevant market for the products which are the subject matter of a specialisation agreement does not exceed a certain level, the agreements will, as a general rule, give rise to economic benefits in the form of economies of scale or scope or better production technologies, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits.

| (14) | Where the products covered by a specialisation agreement are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use as an input for their own downstream products which they subsequently sell on the market, the exemption conferred by this Regulation should also be conditional on the parties’ share on the relevant market for these downstream products not exceeding a certain level. In such a case, merely looking at the parties’ market share at the level of the intermediary product would ignore the potential risk of foreclosing or increasing the price of inputs for competitors at the level of the downstream products. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Where the products covered by a specialisation agreement are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use as an input for their own downstream products which they subsequently sell on the market, the exemption conferred by this Regulation should also be conditional on the parties’ share on the relevant market for these downstream products not exceeding a certain level. In such a case, merely looking at the parties’ market share at the level of the intermediary product would ignore the potential risk of foreclosing or increasing the price of inputs for competitors at the level of the downstream products.

| (15) | There is no presumption that specialisation agreements are either caught by Article 101(1) of the Treaty or that they fail to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty once the market share threshold set out in this Regulation is exceeded or other conditions of this Regulation are not met. In such cases, an individual assessment of the specialisation agreement needs to be conducted under Article 101 of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

There is no presumption that specialisation agreements are either caught by Article 101(1) of the Treaty or that they fail to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty once the market share threshold set out in this Regulation is exceeded or other conditions of this Regulation are not met. In such cases, an individual assessment of the specialisation agreement needs to be conducted under Article 101 of the Treaty.

| (16) | This Regulation should not exempt agreements containing restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the positive effects generated by a specialisation agreement. In principle, agreements containing certain types of severe restrictions of competition relating to the fixing of prices charged to third parties, limitation of output or sales, and allocation of markets or customers should be excluded from the benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of the market share of the parties. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

This Regulation should not exempt agreements containing restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the positive effects generated by a specialisation agreement. In principle, agreements containing certain types of severe restrictions of competition relating to the fixing of prices charged to third parties, limitation of output or sales, and allocation of markets or customers should be excluded from the benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of the market share of the parties.

| (17) | The market share limitation, the non-exemption of certain agreements and the conditions provided for in this Regulation normally ensure that the agreements to which the block exemption applies do not enable the parties to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or services in question. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The market share limitation, the non-exemption of certain agreements and the conditions provided for in this Regulation normally ensure that the agreements to which the block exemption applies do not enable the parties to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or services in question.

| (18) | The benefit of this Regulation may be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The benefit of this Regulation may be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (3).

| (19) | In order to facilitate the conclusion of specialisation agreements, which can have a bearing on the structure of the parties, the period of validity of this Regulation should be fixed at 12 years. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

In order to facilitate the conclusion of specialisation agreements, which can have a bearing on the structure of the parties, the period of validity of this Regulation should be fixed at 12 years.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

TITLE I

DEFINITIONS

Article 1

Definitions

1.   For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

| (a) | ‘specialisation agreement’ means a unilateral specialisation agreement, a reciprocal specialisation agreement or a joint production agreement;






  (1) | ‘unilateral specialisation agreement’ means an agreement between two or more parties which are active on the same product market and by virtue of which a party or parties agree to fully or partly cease production of certain products or to refrain from producing those products and to purchase them from the other party or parties, who agree to produce and supply those products; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

‘specialisation agreement’ means a unilateral specialisation agreement, a reciprocal specialisation agreement or a joint production agreement;

(1)

‘unilateral specialisation agreement’ means an agreement between two or more parties which are active on the same product market and by virtue of which a party or parties agree to fully or partly cease production of certain products or to refrain from producing those products and to purchase them from the other party or parties, who agree to produce and supply those products;

| (2) | ‘reciprocal specialisation agreement’ means an agreement between two or more parties which are active on the same product market and by virtue of which two or more parties, on a reciprocal basis, agree to fully or partly cease or refrain from producing certain but different products and to purchase these products from the other parties, who agree to produce and supply them; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘reciprocal specialisation agreement’ means an agreement between two or more parties which are active on the same product market and by virtue of which two or more parties, on a reciprocal basis, agree to fully or partly cease or refrain from producing certain but different products and to purchase these products from the other parties, who agree to produce and supply them;

| (3) | ‘joint production agreement’ means an agreement by virtue of which two or more parties agree to produce certain products jointly; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘joint production agreement’ means an agreement by virtue of which two or more parties agree to produce certain products jointly;

| (b) | ‘agreement’ means an agreement, a decision by an association of undertakings or a concerted practice; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘agreement’ means an agreement, a decision by an association of undertakings or a concerted practice;

| (c) | ‘product’ means a good or a service, including both intermediary goods or services and final goods or services, with the exception of distribution and rental services; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘product’ means a good or a service, including both intermediary goods or services and final goods or services, with the exception of distribution and rental services;

| (d) | ‘production’ means the manufacture of goods or the preparation of services, including by way of subcontracting; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

‘production’ means the manufacture of goods or the preparation of services, including by way of subcontracting;

| (e) | ‘preparation of services’ means activities upstream of the provision of services to customers; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

‘preparation of services’ means activities upstream of the provision of services to customers;

| (f) | ‘specialisation product’ means a product which is produced under a specialisation agreement; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

‘specialisation product’ means a product which is produced under a specialisation agreement;

| (g) | ‘downstream product’ means a product for which a specialisation product is used as an input by one or more of the parties and which is sold by those parties on the market; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

‘downstream product’ means a product for which a specialisation product is used as an input by one or more of the parties and which is sold by those parties on the market;

| (h) | ‘relevant market’ means the relevant product and geographic market to which the specialisation products belong, and, in addition, where the specialisation products are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use captively as input for downstream products, the relevant product and geographic market to which the downstream products belong; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

‘relevant market’ means the relevant product and geographic market to which the specialisation products belong, and, in addition, where the specialisation products are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use captively as input for downstream products, the relevant product and geographic market to which the downstream products belong;

| (i) | ‘competing undertaking’ means an actual or potential competitor:






  (1) | ‘actual competitor’ means an undertaking that is active on the same relevant market; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(i)

‘competing undertaking’ means an actual or potential competitor:

(1)

‘actual competitor’ means an undertaking that is active on the same relevant market;

| (2) | ‘potential competitor’ means an undertaking that, in the absence of the specialisation agreement, would, on realistic grounds and not just as a mere theoretical possibility, be likely to undertake, within not more than 3 years, the necessary additional investments or other necessary costs to enter the relevant market; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘potential competitor’ means an undertaking that, in the absence of the specialisation agreement, would, on realistic grounds and not just as a mere theoretical possibility, be likely to undertake, within not more than 3 years, the necessary additional investments or other necessary costs to enter the relevant market;

| (j) | ‘exclusive supply obligation’ means an obligation not to supply the specialisation products to a competing undertaking other than a party or parties to the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

‘exclusive supply obligation’ means an obligation not to supply the specialisation products to a competing undertaking other than a party or parties to the agreement;

| (k) | ‘exclusive purchase obligation’ means an obligation to purchase the specialisation products only from a party or parties to the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

(k)

‘exclusive purchase obligation’ means an obligation to purchase the specialisation products only from a party or parties to the agreement;

| (l) | ‘joint’, in the context of distribution, means activities where the work involved is:






  (1) | carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking, or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(l)

‘joint’, in the context of distribution, means activities where the work involved is:

(1)

carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking, or

| (2) | undertaken by a jointly appointed third party distributor on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, provided that the third party is not a competing undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

undertaken by a jointly appointed third party distributor on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, provided that the third party is not a competing undertaking;

| (m) | ‘distribution’ means the provision of the specialisation products. |
| --- | --- |

(m)

‘distribution’ means the provision of the specialisation products.

2.   For the purposes of this Regulation, the terms ‘undertaking’ and ‘party’ shall include their respective connected undertakings.

‘Connected undertakings’ means:

| (a) | undertakings in which a party to the specialisation agreement, directly or indirectly:






  (i) | has the power to exercise more than half the voting rights, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

undertakings in which a party to the specialisation agreement, directly or indirectly:

(i)

has the power to exercise more than half the voting rights,

| (ii) | has the power to appoint more than half the members of the supervisory board, board of management or bodies legally representing the undertaking, or |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

has the power to appoint more than half the members of the supervisory board, board of management or bodies legally representing the undertaking, or

| (iii) | has the right to manage the undertaking’s affairs; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

has the right to manage the undertaking’s affairs;

| (b) | undertakings which directly or indirectly have, over a party to the specialisation agreement, the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

undertakings which directly or indirectly have, over a party to the specialisation agreement, the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (c) | undertakings in which an undertaking referred to in point (b) has, directly or indirectly, the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

undertakings in which an undertaking referred to in point (b) has, directly or indirectly, the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (d) | undertakings in which a party to the specialisation agreement together with one or more of the undertakings referred to in points (a), (b) or (c), or in which two or more of the latter undertakings, jointly have the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(d)

undertakings in which a party to the specialisation agreement together with one or more of the undertakings referred to in points (a), (b) or (c), or in which two or more of the latter undertakings, jointly have the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (e) | undertakings in which the rights or the powers listed in point (a) are jointly held by:






  (i) | parties to the specialisation agreement or their respective connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d), or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(e)

undertakings in which the rights or the powers listed in point (a) are jointly held by:

(i)

parties to the specialisation agreement or their respective connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d), or

| (ii) | one or more of the parties to the specialisation agreement or one or more of their connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d) and one or more third parties. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

one or more of the parties to the specialisation agreement or one or more of their connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d) and one or more third parties.

TITLE II

EXEMPTION

EXEMPTION

Article 2

Exemption

1.   Pursuant to Article 101(3) of the Treaty, and subject to the provisions of this Regulation, it is hereby declared that Article 101(1) of the Treaty shall not apply to specialisation agreements.

2.   The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply to the extent that such agreements contain restrictions of competition falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty.

3.   The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall also apply to specialisation agreements which include provisions on the assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights to one or more of the parties, provided that those provisions:

| (a) | do not constitute the primary object of such agreements, and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

do not constitute the primary object of such agreements, and

| (b) | are directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the such agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

are directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the such agreements.

4.   The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall also apply to specialisation agreements whereby:

| (a) | the parties accept an exclusive purchase or an exclusive supply obligation, or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the parties accept an exclusive purchase or an exclusive supply obligation, or

| (b) | the parties jointly distribute the specialisation products and do not independently sell them. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the parties jointly distribute the specialisation products and do not independently sell them.

TITLE III

THRESHOLDS

THRESHOLDS

Article 3

Market share thresholds

1.   The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall apply on condition that the combined market share of the parties does not exceed 20 % on the relevant market(s) to which the specialisation products belong.

2.   Where the specialisation products are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use captively for the production of downstream products, which they also sell, the exemption foreseen in Article 2 is conditional upon:

| (a) | a combined market share not exceeding 20 % on the relevant market(s) to which the specialisation products belong, and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a combined market share not exceeding 20 % on the relevant market(s) to which the specialisation products belong, and

| (b) | a combined market share not exceeding 20 % on the relevant market(s) to which the downstream products belong. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a combined market share not exceeding 20 % on the relevant market(s) to which the downstream products belong.

Article 4

Application of the market share thresholds

For the purposes of applying the market share thresholds provided for in Article 3, the following rules shall apply:

| 1. | the market share shall be calculated on the basis of the market sales value; if market sales value data are not available, estimates based on other reliable market information, including market sales volumes, may be used to establish the market share of the parties; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the market share shall be calculated on the basis of the market sales value; if market sales value data are not available, estimates based on other reliable market information, including market sales volumes, may be used to establish the market share of the parties;

| 2. | the market share shall be calculated on the basis of data relating to the preceding calendar year; or, alternatively, when the preceding calendar year is not representative of the parties’ position in the relevant market(s), the market share shall be calculated as an average of the parties’ market shares of the last three preceding calendar years; |
| --- | --- |

2.

the market share shall be calculated on the basis of data relating to the preceding calendar year; or, alternatively, when the preceding calendar year is not representative of the parties’ position in the relevant market(s), the market share shall be calculated as an average of the parties’ market shares of the last three preceding calendar years;

| 3. | the market share held by the undertakings referred to in Article 1(2), second subparagraph, point (e) shall be apportioned equally to each undertaking having the rights or the powers listed in Article 1(2), second subparagraph, point (a); |
| --- | --- |

3.

the market share held by the undertakings referred to in Article 1(2), second subparagraph, point (e) shall be apportioned equally to each undertaking having the rights or the powers listed in Article 1(2), second subparagraph, point (a);

| 4. | if the market shares referred to in Article 3 are initially not more than 20 %, but subsequently rises above that level in at least one of the markets concerned by the specialisation agreement, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for a period of two consecutive calendar years following the year in which the 20 % threshold was first exceeded. |
| --- | --- |

4.

if the market shares referred to in Article 3 are initially not more than 20 %, but subsequently rises above that level in at least one of the markets concerned by the specialisation agreement, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for a period of two consecutive calendar years following the year in which the 20 % threshold was first exceeded.

TITLE IV

HARDCORE RESTRICTIONS

HARDCORE RESTRICTIONS

Article 5

Hardcore restrictions

The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall not apply to specialisation agreements which, directly or indirectly, in isolation or in combination with other factors under the control of the parties, have as their object any of the following:

| 1. | the fixing of prices when selling the specialisation products to third parties,
  with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers in the context of joint distribution; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the fixing of prices when selling the specialisation products to third parties,

with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers in the context of joint distribution;

| 2. | the limitation of output or sales,
  with the exception of:






  (a) | provisions on the agreed amount of products in the context of unilateral or reciprocal specialisation agreements; or |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

the limitation of output or sales,

with the exception of:

(a)

provisions on the agreed amount of products in the context of unilateral or reciprocal specialisation agreements; or

| (b) | provisions on setting capacity and production volumes in the context of a joint production agreement; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

provisions on setting capacity and production volumes in the context of a joint production agreement; and

| (c) | the setting of sales targets in the context of joint distribution; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the setting of sales targets in the context of joint distribution;

| 3. | the allocation of markets or customers. |
| --- | --- |

3.

the allocation of markets or customers.

TITLE V

WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE

WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE

Article 6

Withdrawal in individual cases by the European Commission

1.   The Commission may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation, pursuant to Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, where it finds in any particular case that a specialisation agreement to which the exemption provided for in this Regulation applies, nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty.

2.   The benefit of this Regulation could be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in particular where:

| (a) | the relevant market is very concentrated, and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the relevant market is very concentrated, and

| (b) | competition is already weak, in particular because of:






  (i) | the individual market positions of other market participants, or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

competition is already weak, in particular because of:

(i)

the individual market positions of other market participants, or

| (ii) | the links between other market participants created by parallel specialisation agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

the links between other market participants created by parallel specialisation agreements.

Article 7

Withdrawal in individual cases by a competition authority of a Member State

1.   The competition authority of a Member State may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation, pursuant to Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, in respect of the territory of that Member State, or in a part thereof, where it finds in any particular case that a specialisation agreement to which the exemption provided for in this Regulation applies, nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty in respect of the territory of that Member State, or in a part thereof, and where that territory has all the characteristics of a distinct geographic market.

2.   The benefit of this Regulation could be withdrawn by a competition authority of a Member State pursuant to Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, in particular where the circumstances as set out in Article 6(2)(a) and (b) of this Regulation apply.

TITLE VI

FINAL PROVISIONS

FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 8

Transitional period

The prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) of the Treaty shall not apply during the period from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2024 in respect of agreements already in force on 31 December 2022 which do not satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in this Regulation but which satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1218/2010.

Article 9

Period of validity

1.   This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2023.

2.   It shall expire on 31 December 2034.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, ...

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 29.12.1971, p. 46.

1

(*1)  With effect from 1 December 2009, Article 81 of the EC Treaty (previously Article 85 of the EEC Treaty) has become Article 101 of the Treaty. These provisions are, in substance, identical. For the purposes of this Regulation, references to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty or Article 81 of the EC Treaty should be understood as references to Article 101 of the Treaty where appropriate.

*1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1218/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty to categories of specialisation agreements (OJ L 335, 18.12.2010, p. 43).

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1).

3

---

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/9

---

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements

(2022/C 120/02)

The Commission has approved the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of of research and development agreements on 1 March 2022.

The draft for a Commission Regulation is attached as an Annex to this Communication.

The draft for a Commission Regulation is open to public consultation at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/open.html

---

ANNEX

DRAFT COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) .../...

of ...

on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘Treaty’),

Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 of the Council of 20 December 1971 on application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices (1),

Having published a draft of this Regulation,

After consulting the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (*) by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object (i) the research and development of products, technologies or processes up to the stage of industrial application, and (ii) exploitation of the results, including provisions regarding intellectual property rights. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (*) by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object (i) the research and development of products, technologies or processes up to the stage of industrial application, and (ii) exploitation of the results, including provisions regarding intellectual property rights.

| (2) | Article 179(2) of the Treaty calls upon the Union to encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, in their research and technological development activities of high quality, and to support their efforts to cooperate with one another. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 179(2) of the Treaty calls upon the Union to encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, in their research and technological development activities of high quality, and to support their efforts to cooperate with one another.

| (3) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 (2) defines categories of research and development agreements that the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty. In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2022, and taking into account the results of the review procedure, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 (2) defines categories of research and development agreements that the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty. In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2022, and taking into account the results of the review procedure, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation.

| (4) | This Regulation intends to facilitate research and development while at the same time effectively protecting competition. This Regulation should also meet the requirement of providing adequate legal security for undertakings. The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

This Regulation intends to facilitate research and development while at the same time effectively protecting competition. This Regulation should also meet the requirement of providing adequate legal security for undertakings. The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible.

| (5) | Below a certain level of market power, it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of research and development agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Below a certain level of market power, it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of research and development agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition.

| (6) | For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those agreements which are capable of falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In the individual assessment of agreements under Article 101(1) of the Treaty, account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the market structure on the relevant market. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those agreements which are capable of falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In the individual assessment of agreements under Article 101(1) of the Treaty, account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the market structure on the relevant market.

| (7) | Agreements on the joint execution of research work or the joint development of the results of the research, up to but not including the stage of industrial application, generally do not fall within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In certain circumstances, however, such as where the parties agree not to carry out other research and development in the same field, thereby forgoing the opportunity of gaining competitive advantages over the other parties, such agreements may fall within Article 101(1) of the Treaty and should therefore be included within the scope of this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Agreements on the joint execution of research work or the joint development of the results of the research, up to but not including the stage of industrial application, generally do not fall within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty. In certain circumstances, however, such as where the parties agree not to carry out other research and development in the same field, thereby forgoing the opportunity of gaining competitive advantages over the other parties, such agreements may fall within Article 101(1) of the Treaty and should therefore be included within the scope of this Regulation.

| (8) | The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty.

| (9) | Consumers can generally be expected to benefit from the increased volume and effectiveness of research and development through (i) the introduction of new or improved products, technologies or processes, or (ii) a quicker launch of those products, technologies or processes, or (iii) a reduction of prices brought about by new or improved technologies or processes. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Consumers can generally be expected to benefit from the increased volume and effectiveness of research and development through (i) the introduction of new or improved products, technologies or processes, or (ii) a quicker launch of those products, technologies or processes, or (iii) a reduction of prices brought about by new or improved technologies or processes.

| (10) | Cooperation in joint or paid-for research and development and in the exploitation of the results is most likely to promote technical and economic progress if the parties contribute complementary skills, assets or activities to the cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Cooperation in joint or paid-for research and development and in the exploitation of the results is most likely to promote technical and economic progress if the parties contribute complementary skills, assets or activities to the cooperation.

| (11) | The joint exploitation of results can take different forms such as production, distribution of products or application of technologies, assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights or communication of know-how required for such production or application that substantially contribute to technical or economic progress. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The joint exploitation of results can take different forms such as production, distribution of products or application of technologies, assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights or communication of know-how required for such production or application that substantially contribute to technical or economic progress.

| (12) | In order to justify the exemption established by this Regulation, the joint exploitation should relate to products, technologies or processes for which the use of the results of the research and development is indispensable. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

In order to justify the exemption established by this Regulation, the joint exploitation should relate to products, technologies or processes for which the use of the results of the research and development is indispensable.

| (13) | Moreover, all the parties should agree in the research and development agreement that they will all have full access to the final results of the joint research and development, including any arising intellectual property rights and know-how, for the purposes of (i) further research and development and (ii) exploitation, as soon as the final results become available. Access to the results should generally not be limited as regards the use of the results for the purposes of further research and development. However, where the parties, in accordance with this Regulation, limit their rights of exploitation, in particular where they specialise in the context of exploitation, access to the results for the purposes of exploitation may be limited accordingly. Furthermore, where (i) academic bodies, research institutes or (ii) undertakings that supply research and development as a commercial service without normally being active in the exploitation of results participate in research and development, they may agree to use the results of research and development solely for the purpose of further research. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

Moreover, all the parties should agree in the research and development agreement that they will all have full access to the final results of the joint research and development, including any arising intellectual property rights and know-how, for the purposes of (i) further research and development and (ii) exploitation, as soon as the final results become available. Access to the results should generally not be limited as regards the use of the results for the purposes of further research and development. However, where the parties, in accordance with this Regulation, limit their rights of exploitation, in particular where they specialise in the context of exploitation, access to the results for the purposes of exploitation may be limited accordingly. Furthermore, where (i) academic bodies, research institutes or (ii) undertakings that supply research and development as a commercial service without normally being active in the exploitation of results participate in research and development, they may agree to use the results of research and development solely for the purpose of further research.

| (14) | Depending on their capabilities and commercial needs, the parties may make unequal contributions to their research and development cooperation. Therefore, in order to reflect, and to make up for, the differences in the value or the nature of the parties’ contributions, a research and development agreement benefiting from this Regulation may provide that one party is to compensate another for obtaining access to the results for the purposes of further research or exploitation. However, the compensation should not be so high as to effectively impede such access. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Depending on their capabilities and commercial needs, the parties may make unequal contributions to their research and development cooperation. Therefore, in order to reflect, and to make up for, the differences in the value or the nature of the parties’ contributions, a research and development agreement benefiting from this Regulation may provide that one party is to compensate another for obtaining access to the results for the purposes of further research or exploitation. However, the compensation should not be so high as to effectively impede such access.

| (15) | Where the research and development agreement does not provide for any joint exploitation of the results, the parties should agree in the research and development agreement to grant each other access to their respective pre-existing know-how, as long as this know-how is indispensable for the purposes of the exploitation of the results by the other parties. The compensation (e.g. rates of any licence fee) charged should not be so high as to effectively impede access to the know-how by the other parties. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Where the research and development agreement does not provide for any joint exploitation of the results, the parties should agree in the research and development agreement to grant each other access to their respective pre-existing know-how, as long as this know-how is indispensable for the purposes of the exploitation of the results by the other parties. The compensation (e.g. rates of any licence fee) charged should not be so high as to effectively impede access to the know-how by the other parties.

| (16) | The exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to research and development agreements that do not afford the undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or technologies in question. It is necessary to exclude from the block exemption agreements between competitors whose combined share of the market for products or technologies capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the results of the research and development exceeds a certain level at the time the agreement is entered into. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

The exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to research and development agreements that do not afford the undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or technologies in question. It is necessary to exclude from the block exemption agreements between competitors whose combined share of the market for products or technologies capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the results of the research and development exceeds a certain level at the time the agreement is entered into.

| (17) | The exemption established by this Regulation should also be limited to research and development agreements that do not afford the undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in innovation, including the development of new products or technologies. It is necessary to exclude research and development agreements from the block exemption where there would remain less than three competing R&D efforts in addition to and comparable with those of the parties to the R&D agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The exemption established by this Regulation should also be limited to research and development agreements that do not afford the undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in innovation, including the development of new products or technologies. It is necessary to exclude research and development agreements from the block exemption where there would remain less than three competing R&D efforts in addition to and comparable with those of the parties to the R&D agreement.

| (18) | However, there is no presumption that research and development agreements are either caught by Article 101(1) of the Treaty or that they fail to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty once the thresholds or other conditions set out in this Regulation are not met. In such cases, an individual assessment of the research and development agreement needs to be conducted under Article 101 of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

However, there is no presumption that research and development agreements are either caught by Article 101(1) of the Treaty or that they fail to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty once the thresholds or other conditions set out in this Regulation are not met. In such cases, an individual assessment of the research and development agreement needs to be conducted under Article 101 of the Treaty.

| (19) | In order to ensure the maintenance of effective competition during the joint exploitation of the results, provision should be made for the block exemption to cease to apply if the parties’ combined share of the market for the products or technologies arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development exceeds a certain level. The exemption should continue to apply irrespective of the parties’ market shares for a certain period after the commencement of joint exploitation, so as to await stabilisation of their market shares, particularly after the introduction of an entirely new product, and to guarantee a minimum period of return on the investments involved. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

In order to ensure the maintenance of effective competition during the joint exploitation of the results, provision should be made for the block exemption to cease to apply if the parties’ combined share of the market for the products or technologies arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development exceeds a certain level. The exemption should continue to apply irrespective of the parties’ market shares for a certain period after the commencement of joint exploitation, so as to await stabilisation of their market shares, particularly after the introduction of an entirely new product, and to guarantee a minimum period of return on the investments involved.

| (20) | This Regulation should not exempt agreements containing restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the positive effects generated by a research and development agreement. In principle, agreements containing certain types of severe restrictions of competition such as limitations on the freedom of parties to carry out research and development in a field unconnected to the agreement, the fixing of prices charged to third parties, limitations on output or sales, and limitations on effecting passive sales for the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers reserved for other parties, should be excluded from the benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of the market share of the parties. In this context, field of use restrictions do not constitute limitations of output or sales, and also do not constitute territorial or customer restrictions. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

This Regulation should not exempt agreements containing restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the positive effects generated by a research and development agreement. In principle, agreements containing certain types of severe restrictions of competition such as limitations on the freedom of parties to carry out research and development in a field unconnected to the agreement, the fixing of prices charged to third parties, limitations on output or sales, and limitations on effecting passive sales for the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers reserved for other parties, should be excluded from the benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of the market share of the parties. In this context, field of use restrictions do not constitute limitations of output or sales, and also do not constitute territorial or customer restrictions.

| (21) | The market share limitation, the non-exemption of certain agreements and the conditions provided for in this Regulation normally ensure that the agreements to which the block exemption applies do not enable the parties to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or technologies in question. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

The market share limitation, the non-exemption of certain agreements and the conditions provided for in this Regulation normally ensure that the agreements to which the block exemption applies do not enable the parties to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or technologies in question.

| (22) | The possibility cannot be ruled out that anti-competitive foreclosure effects may arise where one party finances several research and development projects carried out by competitors with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, in particular where it obtains the exclusive right to exploit the results vis-à-vis third parties. Therefore, the benefit of this Regulation should be conferred on such paid-for research and development agreements only if the combined market share of all the parties involved in the connected agreements, that is to say, the financing party and all the parties carrying out the research and development, does not exceed 25 %. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The possibility cannot be ruled out that anti-competitive foreclosure effects may arise where one party finances several research and development projects carried out by competitors with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, in particular where it obtains the exclusive right to exploit the results vis-à-vis third parties. Therefore, the benefit of this Regulation should be conferred on such paid-for research and development agreements only if the combined market share of all the parties involved in the connected agreements, that is to say, the financing party and all the parties carrying out the research and development, does not exceed 25 %.

| (23) | The benefit of this Regulation may be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The benefit of this Regulation may be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (3).

| (24) | As research and development agreements are often of a long-term nature, especially where the cooperation extends to the exploitation of the results, the period of validity of this Regulation should be fixed at 12 years. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

As research and development agreements are often of a long-term nature, especially where the cooperation extends to the exploitation of the results, the period of validity of this Regulation should be fixed at 12 years.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

TITLE I

DEFINITIONS

Article 1

Definitions

1.   For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

| (1) | ‘R&D agreement’ means an agreement entered into between two or more parties which relates to the conditions under which those parties pursue:






  (a) | joint research and development of contract products or contract technologies which:






  (i) | excludes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development, or |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(1)

‘R&D agreement’ means an agreement entered into between two or more parties which relates to the conditions under which those parties pursue:

(a)

joint research and development of contract products or contract technologies which:

(i)

excludes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development, or

| (ii) | includes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development; or |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

includes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development; or

| (b) | paid-for research and development of contract products or contract technologies which:






  (i) | excludes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development, or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

paid-for research and development of contract products or contract technologies which:

(i)

excludes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development, or

| (ii) | includes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development; or |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

includes joint exploitation of the results of that research and development; or

| (c) | joint exploitation of the results of research and development of contract products or contract technologies carried out pursuant to a prior agreement falling under paragraph (1)(a) between the same parties; or |
| --- | --- |

(c)

joint exploitation of the results of research and development of contract products or contract technologies carried out pursuant to a prior agreement falling under paragraph (1)(a) between the same parties; or

| (d) | joint exploitation of the results of research and development of contract products or contract technologies carried out pursuant to a prior agreement falling under paragraph (1)(b) between the same parties; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

joint exploitation of the results of research and development of contract products or contract technologies carried out pursuant to a prior agreement falling under paragraph (1)(b) between the same parties;

| (2) | ‘agreement’ means an agreement, a decision by an association of undertakings or a concerted practice; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘agreement’ means an agreement, a decision by an association of undertakings or a concerted practice;

| (3) | ‘research and development’ (‘R&D’) means activities aimed at acquiring know-how relating to existing or new products, technologies or processes, the carrying out of theoretical analysis, systematic study or experimentation, including experimental production, technical testing of products or processes, the establishment of the necessary facilities and the obtaining of intellectual property rights for the results; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘research and development’ (‘R&D’) means activities aimed at acquiring know-how relating to existing or new products, technologies or processes, the carrying out of theoretical analysis, systematic study or experimentation, including experimental production, technical testing of products or processes, the establishment of the necessary facilities and the obtaining of intellectual property rights for the results;

| (4) | ‘product’ means a good or a service, including both intermediary goods or services and final goods or services; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

‘product’ means a good or a service, including both intermediary goods or services and final goods or services;

| (5) | ‘contract technology’ means a technology or process arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development. This includes technologies or processes obtained through an R&D pole as well as new technologies or processes; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

‘contract technology’ means a technology or process arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development. This includes technologies or processes obtained through an R&D pole as well as new technologies or processes;

| (6) | ‘contract product’ means a product arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development or produced or provided applying the contract technologies. This includes products obtained through an R&D pole as well as new products; |
| --- | --- |

(6)

‘contract product’ means a product arising out of the joint or paid-for research and development or produced or provided applying the contract technologies. This includes products obtained through an R&D pole as well as new products;

| (7) | ‘new product or technology’ means a product, technology or process that does not yet exist at the time when the R&D agreement falling under paragraph 1(a) or (b) is entered into and that will, if emerging, create its own new market and not improve, substitute or replace an existing product, technology or process; |
| --- | --- |

(7)

‘new product or technology’ means a product, technology or process that does not yet exist at the time when the R&D agreement falling under paragraph 1(a) or (b) is entered into and that will, if emerging, create its own new market and not improve, substitute or replace an existing product, technology or process;

| (8) | ‘R&D pole’ means R&D efforts directed primarily towards a specific aim or objective. The specific aim or objective of an R&D pole cannot yet be defined as a product or a technology or involves a substantially broader target than products or technologies on a specific market; |
| --- | --- |

(8)

‘R&D pole’ means R&D efforts directed primarily towards a specific aim or objective. The specific aim or objective of an R&D pole cannot yet be defined as a product or a technology or involves a substantially broader target than products or technologies on a specific market;

| (9) | ‘exploitation of the results’ means the production or distribution of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies or the assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights or the communication of know-how required for such production or application; |
| --- | --- |

(9)

‘exploitation of the results’ means the production or distribution of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies or the assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights or the communication of know-how required for such production or application;

| (10) | ‘intellectual property rights’ means industrial property rights, in particular patents and trademarks; as well as copyright and neighbouring rights; |
| --- | --- |

(10)

‘intellectual property rights’ means industrial property rights, in particular patents and trademarks; as well as copyright and neighbouring rights;

| (11) | ‘know-how’ means a package of practical information, resulting from experience and testing, which is:






  (a) | ‘secret’, that is to say, not generally known or easily accessible; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(11)

‘know-how’ means a package of practical information, resulting from experience and testing, which is:

(a)

‘secret’, that is to say, not generally known or easily accessible;

| (b) | ‘substantial’, that is to say, significant and useful for the production of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘substantial’, that is to say, significant and useful for the production of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies; and

| (c) | ‘identified’, that is to say, described in a sufficiently comprehensive manner so as to make it possible to verify that it fulfils the criteria of secrecy and substantiality; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘identified’, that is to say, described in a sufficiently comprehensive manner so as to make it possible to verify that it fulfils the criteria of secrecy and substantiality;

| (12) | ‘joint’, in the context of activities carried out under an R&D agreement, means activities where the work involved is:






  (a) | carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(12)

‘joint’, in the context of activities carried out under an R&D agreement, means activities where the work involved is:

(a)

carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking;

| (b) | jointly entrusted to a third party; or |
| --- | --- |

(b)

jointly entrusted to a third party; or

| (c) | allocated between the parties by way of specialisation in the context of research and development or specialisation in the context of exploitation; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

allocated between the parties by way of specialisation in the context of research and development or specialisation in the context of exploitation;

| (13) | ‘specialisation in the context of research and development’ means that each of the parties is involved in the research and development activities covered by the R&D agreement and they divide the research and development work between them in any way that they consider most appropriate; this does not include paid-for research and development; |
| --- | --- |

(13)

‘specialisation in the context of research and development’ means that each of the parties is involved in the research and development activities covered by the R&D agreement and they divide the research and development work between them in any way that they consider most appropriate; this does not include paid-for research and development;

| (14) | ‘specialisation in the context of exploitation’ means that the parties allocate between them individual tasks such as production or distribution, or impose restrictions upon each other regarding the exploitation of the results such as restrictions in relation to certain territories, customers or fields of use; this includes a scenario where only one party produces and distributes the contract products on the basis of an exclusive licence granted by the other parties; |
| --- | --- |

(14)

‘specialisation in the context of exploitation’ means that the parties allocate between them individual tasks such as production or distribution, or impose restrictions upon each other regarding the exploitation of the results such as restrictions in relation to certain territories, customers or fields of use; this includes a scenario where only one party produces and distributes the contract products on the basis of an exclusive licence granted by the other parties;

| (15) | ‘paid-for research and development’ means research and development that is carried out by one party and financed by a financing party; |
| --- | --- |

(15)

‘paid-for research and development’ means research and development that is carried out by one party and financed by a financing party;

| (16) | ‘financing party’ means a party financing paid-for research and development while not carrying out any of the research and development activities itself; |
| --- | --- |

(16)

‘financing party’ means a party financing paid-for research and development while not carrying out any of the research and development activities itself;

| (17) | ‘undertaking competing for an existing product and/or technology’ means an actual or a potential competitor:






  (a) | ‘actual competitor’ means an undertaking that is supplying an existing product, technology or process capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract product or the contract technology on the relevant geographic market; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(17)

‘undertaking competing for an existing product and/or technology’ means an actual or a potential competitor:

(a)

‘actual competitor’ means an undertaking that is supplying an existing product, technology or process capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract product or the contract technology on the relevant geographic market;

| (b) | ‘potential competitor’ means an undertaking that, in the absence of the R&D agreement, on realistic grounds and not just as a mere theoretical possibility, would be likely to undertake, within not more than 3 years, the necessary additional investments or incur the necessary costs to supply a product, technology or process capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract product or contract technology on the relevant geographic market; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘potential competitor’ means an undertaking that, in the absence of the R&D agreement, on realistic grounds and not just as a mere theoretical possibility, would be likely to undertake, within not more than 3 years, the necessary additional investments or incur the necessary costs to supply a product, technology or process capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract product or contract technology on the relevant geographic market;

| (18) | ‘undertaking competing in innovation’ means an undertaking that is not competing for an existing product and/or technology and that independently engages in or, in the absence of the R&D agreement, would be able and likely to independently engage in R&D efforts which concern:






  (a) | the research and development of the same or likely substitutable new products and/or technologies as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(18)

‘undertaking competing in innovation’ means an undertaking that is not competing for an existing product and/or technology and that independently engages in or, in the absence of the R&D agreement, would be able and likely to independently engage in R&D efforts which concern:

(a)

the research and development of the same or likely substitutable new products and/or technologies as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; or

| (b) | R&D poles pursuing substantially the same aim or objective as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

R&D poles pursuing substantially the same aim or objective as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement;

| (19) | ‘competing R&D effort’ means an R&D effort in which a third party engages, alone or in cooperation with other third parties, or in which a third party is able and likely to independently engage, and which concerns:






  (a) | the research and development of the same or likely substitutable new products and/or technologies as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(19)

‘competing R&D effort’ means an R&D effort in which a third party engages, alone or in cooperation with other third parties, or in which a third party is able and likely to independently engage, and which concerns:

(a)

the research and development of the same or likely substitutable new products and/or technologies as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; or

| (b) | R&D poles pursuing substantially the same aim or objective as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

R&D poles pursuing substantially the same aim or objective as the ones to be covered by the R&D agreement;

These third parties must be independent from the parties to the R&D agreement.

| (20) | ‘not competing undertaking’ means an undertaking that is neither an undertaking competing for an existing product and/or technology nor an undertaking competing in innovation; |
| --- | --- |

(20)

‘not competing undertaking’ means an undertaking that is neither an undertaking competing for an existing product and/or technology nor an undertaking competing in innovation;

| (21) | ‘relevant product market’ means the relevant market for the products capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract products; |
| --- | --- |

(21)

‘relevant product market’ means the relevant market for the products capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract products;

| (22) | ‘relevant technology market’ means the relevant market for the technologies or processes capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract technologies; |
| --- | --- |

(22)

‘relevant technology market’ means the relevant market for the technologies or processes capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the contract technologies;

| (23) | ‘active sales’ means all forms of selling other than passive sales; |
| --- | --- |

(23)

‘active sales’ means all forms of selling other than passive sales;

| (24) | ‘passive sales’ means sales in response to unsolicited requests from individual customers, including delivery of products to the customer or customers, without having initiated the sale through actively targeting the particular customer, customer group or territory; passive sales include sales resulting from participating in private or public procurement tenders. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

‘passive sales’ means sales in response to unsolicited requests from individual customers, including delivery of products to the customer or customers, without having initiated the sale through actively targeting the particular customer, customer group or territory; passive sales include sales resulting from participating in private or public procurement tenders.

2.   For the purposes of this Regulation, the terms ‘undertaking’ and ‘party’ shall include their respective connected undertakings.

‘Connected undertakings’ means:

| (a) | undertakings in which a party to the R&D agreement, directly or indirectly:






  (i) | has the power to exercise more than half the voting rights; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

undertakings in which a party to the R&D agreement, directly or indirectly:

(i)

has the power to exercise more than half the voting rights;

| (ii) | has the power to appoint more than half the members of the supervisory board, board of management or bodies legally representing the undertaking; or |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

has the power to appoint more than half the members of the supervisory board, board of management or bodies legally representing the undertaking; or

| (iii) | has the right to manage the undertaking’s affairs; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

has the right to manage the undertaking’s affairs;

| (b) | undertakings which directly or indirectly have, over a party to the R&D agreement, the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

undertakings which directly or indirectly have, over a party to the R&D agreement, the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (c) | undertakings in which an undertaking referred to in point (b) has, directly or indirectly, the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

undertakings in which an undertaking referred to in point (b) has, directly or indirectly, the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (d) | undertakings in which a party to the R&D agreement together with one or more of the undertakings referred to in points (a), (b) or (c), or in which two or more of the latter undertakings, jointly have the rights or powers listed in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(d)

undertakings in which a party to the R&D agreement together with one or more of the undertakings referred to in points (a), (b) or (c), or in which two or more of the latter undertakings, jointly have the rights or powers listed in point (a);

| (e) | undertakings in which the rights or the powers listed in point (a) are jointly held by:






  (i) | parties to the R&D agreement or their respective connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d); or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(e)

undertakings in which the rights or the powers listed in point (a) are jointly held by:

(i)

parties to the R&D agreement or their respective connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d); or

| (ii) | one or more of the parties to the R&D agreement or one or more of their connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d) and one or more third parties. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

one or more of the parties to the R&D agreement or one or more of their connected undertakings referred to in points (a) to (d) and one or more third parties.

TITLE II

EXEMPTION

EXEMPTION

Article 2

Exemption

1.   Pursuant to Article 101(3) of the Treaty and subject to the provisions of this Regulation, it is hereby declared that Article 101(1) of the Treaty shall not apply to R&D agreements.

2.   The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply to the extent that R&D agreements contain restrictions of competition falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty.

3.   The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall also apply to R&D agreements which include provisions on the assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights to one or more of the parties or to an entity the parties establish to carry out the joint or paid-for research and development or joint exploitation, provided that those provisions:

| (a) | do not constitute the primary object of such agreements; and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

do not constitute the primary object of such agreements; and

| (b) | are directly related to and necessary for the implementation of such agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

are directly related to and necessary for the implementation of such agreements.

TITLE III

CONDITIONS FOR EXEMPTION

CONDITIONS FOR EXEMPTION

Article 3

Access to the final results

1.   The R&D agreement must stipulate that all the parties have full access to the final results of the joint or paid-for research and development for the purpose of further research and development and for the purpose of exploitation.

| (a) | Access provided for in paragraph 1 shall include any resulting intellectual property rights and know-how. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Access provided for in paragraph 1 shall include any resulting intellectual property rights and know-how.

| (b) | Access provided for in paragraph 1 shall be granted as soon as the results of the research and development become available. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Access provided for in paragraph 1 shall be granted as soon as the results of the research and development become available.

2.   The R&D agreement may state that the parties compensate each other for giving access to the results for the purposes of further research and development or for the purpose of further exploitation, but the compensation must not be so high as to effectively impede such access.

3.   Research institutes, academic bodies and undertakings that supply research and development as a commercial service without normally being active in the exploitation of results, may agree to confine their use of the results for the purposes of further research.

4.   Where the parties limit their rights of exploitation in accordance with this Regulation, in particular where they specialise in the context of exploitation, access to the results for the purposes of exploitation may be limited accordingly.

Article 4

Access to pre-existing know-how

1.   R&D agreements that exclude joint exploitation of the results of joint or paid-for research and development, must stipulate that each party must be granted access to any pre-existing know-how of the other parties if this know-how is indispensable for the purposes of its exploitation of the results.

2.   R&D agreements that exclude joint exploitation of the results of joint or paid-for research and development may state that the parties compensate each other for giving access to their pre-existing know-how. The compensation must not be so high as to effectively impede such access.

Article 5

Joint exploitation

1.   Any joint exploitation may only pertain to results which are:

| (a) | indispensable for the production of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies; and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

indispensable for the production of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies; and

| (b) | protected by intellectual property rights or constitute know-how. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

protected by intellectual property rights or constitute know-how.

2.   Parties charged with the production of the contract products by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation must be required to fulfil orders for supplies of the contract products from the other parties, except where:

| (a) | the R&D agreement also provides for joint distribution by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or by a third party jointly entrusted by the parties; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the R&D agreement also provides for joint distribution by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or by a third party jointly entrusted by the parties; or

| (b) | the parties have agreed that only the party producing the contract products may distribute them. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the parties have agreed that only the party producing the contract products may distribute them.

Article 6

Thresholds, market shares and duration of exemption

1.   Where the parties to the R&D agreement are not competing undertakings, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall apply irrespective of market shares for the duration of the research and development.

2.   Where two or more of the parties to the R&D agreement are undertakings competing for an existing product and/or technology, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall apply for the duration of the research and development if, at the time the R&D agreement is entered into:

| (a) | the combined market share of the parties to an R&D agreement involving joint research and development, as defined in Article 1 paragraph 1(1)(a) or (1)(c), does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the combined market share of the parties to an R&D agreement involving joint research and development, as defined in Article 1 paragraph 1(1)(a) or (1)(c), does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets; or

| (b) | in case of an R&D agreement involving paid-for research and development, as defined in Article 1 paragraph 1 (1)(b) or (1)(d), the combined market share of the financing party and all the parties with which the financing party has entered into R&D agreements with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in case of an R&D agreement involving paid-for research and development, as defined in Article 1 paragraph 1 (1)(b) or (1)(d), the combined market share of the financing party and all the parties with which the financing party has entered into R&D agreements with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets.

3.   Where two or more of the parties to the R&D agreement are undertakings competing in innovation, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall apply for the duration of the research and development if, at the time the R&D agreement is entered into, there are three or more competing R&D efforts in addition to and comparable with those of the parties to the R&D agreement.

4.   For R&D agreements where the results are jointly exploited, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for seven years from the time the contract products or contract technologies are first put on the market within the internal market, if the conditions provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 are satisfied at the time the agreement falling under Article 1 paragraph 1 (1)(a) or (b) is entered into. For an agreement falling under Article 1 paragraph 1 (1)(c) or (d) to benefit from such a continued exemption, the conditions provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 must be satisfied at the point in time when the prior agreement pursuant to Article 1 paragraph 1 (1)(a) or (b) was entered into.

5.   After the end of the seven year period referred to in paragraph 4, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply as long as the combined market share of the parties to the R&D agreement does not exceed 25 % on the markets to which the contract products or contract technologies belong. If, after the end of the seven year period, the market share rises above 25 % on one of these markets, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for a period of two consecutive calendar years following the year in which the 25 % threshold was first exceeded.

Article 7

Application of the thresholds

1.   For the purposes of applying the market share thresholds provided for in Articles 6 paragraph 2 and 5, the following rules shall apply:

| (a) | The market share shall be calculated on the basis of market sales value; if market sales value data are not available, estimates based on other reliable market information, including market sales volumes, expenditure in research and development or research and development capabilities, may be used to establish the market share of the parties; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

The market share shall be calculated on the basis of market sales value; if market sales value data are not available, estimates based on other reliable market information, including market sales volumes, expenditure in research and development or research and development capabilities, may be used to establish the market share of the parties;

| (b) | The market share shall be calculated on the basis of data relating to the preceding calendar year; or, alternatively, when the preceding calendar year is not representative of the parties’ position in the relevant market(s), the market share shall be calculated as an average of the parties’ market shares of the last three preceding calendar years; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

The market share shall be calculated on the basis of data relating to the preceding calendar year; or, alternatively, when the preceding calendar year is not representative of the parties’ position in the relevant market(s), the market share shall be calculated as an average of the parties’ market shares of the last three preceding calendar years;

| (c) | The market share held by the undertakings referred to in Article 1 paragraph 2 (e) shall be apportioned equally to each undertaking having the rights or the powers listed in Article 1 paragraph 2 (a). |
| --- | --- |

(c)

The market share held by the undertakings referred to in Article 1 paragraph 2 (e) shall be apportioned equally to each undertaking having the rights or the powers listed in Article 1 paragraph 2 (a).

2.   For the purposes of applying the threshold provided for in Article 6 paragraph 3, the assessment of comparability of competing R&D efforts shall be made on the basis of reliable information concerning elements such as (i) the size, stage and timing of the R&D efforts, (ii) third parties’ (access to) financial and human resources, their intellectual property, know-how or other specialised assets, their previous R&D efforts and (iii) the third parties’ capability and likelihood to exploit directly or indirectly possible results of their R&D efforts on the internal market.

TITLE IV

HARDCORE AND EXCLUDED RESTRICTIONS

HARDCORE AND EXCLUDED RESTRICTIONS

Article 8

Hardcore restrictions

The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall not apply to R&D agreements which, directly or indirectly, in isolation or in combination with other factors under the control of the parties, have as their object any of the following restrictions:

| 1. | The restriction of the freedom of the parties to carry out research and development independently or in cooperation with third parties:






  (a) | in a field unconnected with that to which the R&D agreement relates; or |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The restriction of the freedom of the parties to carry out research and development independently or in cooperation with third parties:

(a)

in a field unconnected with that to which the R&D agreement relates; or

| (b) | in the field to which the R&D agreement relates or in a connected field after the completion of the joint research and development or paid-for research and development. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in the field to which the R&D agreement relates or in a connected field after the completion of the joint research and development or paid-for research and development.

| 2. | The limitation of output or sales, with the exception of:






  (a) | the setting of production targets where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint production of the contract products; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The limitation of output or sales, with the exception of:

(a)

the setting of production targets where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint production of the contract products;

| (b) | the setting of sales targets, where the joint exploitation of the results:






  (i) | includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

the setting of sales targets, where the joint exploitation of the results:

(i)

includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies, and

| (ii) | is carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or is jointly entrusted to a third party; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

is carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or is jointly entrusted to a third party;

| (c) | practices constituting specialisation in the context of exploitation; and |
| --- | --- |

(c)

practices constituting specialisation in the context of exploitation; and

| (d) | the restriction of the freedom of the parties to produce, sell, assign or license products, technologies or processes which compete with the contract products or contract technologies during the period for which the parties have agreed to jointly exploit the results. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the restriction of the freedom of the parties to produce, sell, assign or license products, technologies or processes which compete with the contract products or contract technologies during the period for which the parties have agreed to jointly exploit the results.

| 3. | The fixing of prices when selling the contract product or licensing the contract technologies to third parties, with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers or the fixing of licence fees charged to immediate licensees where the joint exploitation of the results:






  (a) | includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

The fixing of prices when selling the contract product or licensing the contract technologies to third parties, with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers or the fixing of licence fees charged to immediate licensees where the joint exploitation of the results:

(a)

includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies, and

| (b) | is carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or is jointly entrusted to a third party. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

is carried out by a joint team, organisation or undertaking or is jointly entrusted to a third party.

| 4. | The restriction of the territory in which, or of the customers to whom, the parties may passively sell the contract products or license the contract technologies, with the exception of the requirement to exclusively license the results to another party. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The restriction of the territory in which, or of the customers to whom, the parties may passively sell the contract products or license the contract technologies, with the exception of the requirement to exclusively license the results to another party.

| 5. | The requirement not to make any, or to limit, active sales of the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers which have not been exclusively allocated to one of the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The requirement not to make any, or to limit, active sales of the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers which have not been exclusively allocated to one of the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation.

| 6. | The requirement to refuse to meet demand from customers in the parties’ respective territories, or from customers otherwise allocated between the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation, who would market the contract products in other territories within the internal market. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The requirement to refuse to meet demand from customers in the parties’ respective territories, or from customers otherwise allocated between the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation, who would market the contract products in other territories within the internal market.

| 7. | The requirement to make it difficult for users or resellers to obtain the contract products from other resellers within the internal market. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The requirement to make it difficult for users or resellers to obtain the contract products from other resellers within the internal market.

Article 9

Excluded restrictions

1.   The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall not apply to the following obligations in R&D agreements:

| (a) | The obligation not to challenge:






  (i) | after completion of the research and development, the validity of intellectual property rights, which:






  (1) | the parties hold in the internal market, and |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(a)

The obligation not to challenge:

(i)

after completion of the research and development, the validity of intellectual property rights, which:

(1)

the parties hold in the internal market, and

| (2) | are relevant to the research and development; or |
| --- | --- |

(2)

are relevant to the research and development; or

| (ii) | after the expiry of the R&D agreement, the validity of intellectual property rights which:






  (1) | the parties hold in the internal market, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

(ii)

after the expiry of the R&D agreement, the validity of intellectual property rights which:

(1)

the parties hold in the internal market, and

| (2) | protect the results of the research and development. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

protect the results of the research and development.

The possibility to provide for termination of the R&D agreement in the event of one of the parties challenging the validity of the intellectual property rights referred to in (i) and (ii) shall remain unaffected;

| (b) | The obligation not to grant licences to third parties to produce the contract products or to apply the contract technologies unless the agreement provides for the exploitation of the results of the joint or paid-for research and development by at least one of the parties and such exploitation takes place in the internal market vis-à-vis third parties. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

The obligation not to grant licences to third parties to produce the contract products or to apply the contract technologies unless the agreement provides for the exploitation of the results of the joint or paid-for research and development by at least one of the parties and such exploitation takes place in the internal market vis-à-vis third parties.

2.   If the R&D agreement includes any of the excluded restrictions listed in this Article, the exemption provided in Article 2 continues to apply if the excluded restrictions are severable from the remaining part of the R&D agreement and provided that the rest of the conditions of this Regulation are met.

TITLE V

WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE

WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE

Article 10

Withdrawal in individual cases by the European Commission

1.   The Commission may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation, pursuant to Article 29(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, where it finds in any particular case that an R&D agreement to which the exemption provided for in this Regulation applies nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty.

2.   The benefit of this Regulation could be withdrawn pursuant to Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in particular where:

| (a) | the existence of an R&D agreement substantially restricts the scope for third parties to carry out research and development in the field(s) related to the contract products or contract technologies; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the existence of an R&D agreement substantially restricts the scope for third parties to carry out research and development in the field(s) related to the contract products or contract technologies;

| (b) | the existence of the R&D agreement substantially restricts the access of third parties to the market for the contract products or contract technologies; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the existence of the R&D agreement substantially restricts the access of third parties to the market for the contract products or contract technologies;

| (c) | the parties do not exploit the results of the joint or paid-for research and development vis-à-vis third parties without any objectively valid reason; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the parties do not exploit the results of the joint or paid-for research and development vis-à-vis third parties without any objectively valid reason;

| (d) | the contract products or contract technologies are not subject in the whole or a substantial part of the internal market to effective competition from products, technologies or processes considered by users as equivalent in view of their characteristics, price and intended use. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the contract products or contract technologies are not subject in the whole or a substantial part of the internal market to effective competition from products, technologies or processes considered by users as equivalent in view of their characteristics, price and intended use.

Article 11

Withdrawal in individual cases by a competition authority of a Member State

1.   The competition authority of a Member State may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation pursuant to Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, in respect of the territory of that Member State, or in a part thereof, where it finds in any particular case that an R&D agreement to which the exemption provided for in this Regulation applies nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty in respect of the territory of that Member State, or in a part thereof, which has all the characteristics of a distinct geographic market.

2.   The benefit of this Regulation could be withdrawn by a competition authority of a Member State pursuant to Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, in particular where any of the circumstances as set out in Article 10 paragraph 2(a) to 2(d) of this Regulation applies.

TITLE VI

FINAL PROVISIONS

FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 12

Transitional period

1.   Without prejudice to the specific transitional provision for R&D agreements between undertakings competing in innovation set out in paragraph 2, the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) of the Treaty shall not apply during the period from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2024 in respect of agreements already in force on 31 December 2022 which do not satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in this Regulation but which satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010.

2.   For R&D agreements between undertakings competing in innovation, Article 1 paragraph 1(18) and Article 6 paragraph 3 shall only apply to agreements that enter into force after 31 December 2022.

Article 13

Period of validity

1.   This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2023.

2.   It shall expire on 31 December 2034.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, ...

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 29.12.1971, p. 46.

1

(*)  With effect from 1 December 2009, Article 81 of the EC Treaty (previously Article 85 of the EEC Treaty) has become Article 101 of the Treaty. These provisions are, in substance, identical. For the purposes of this Regulation, references to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty or Article 81 of the EC Treaty should be understood as references to Article 101 of the Treaty where appropriate.

*

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements (OJ L 335, 18.12.2010, p. 36).

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1).

3

---

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/22

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10625 – CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 120/03)

On 9 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10625. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10625. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/23

---

Notice for the attention of the entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/932/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/420, and in Council Regulation (EU) 1352/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2022/419 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen

(2022/C 120/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the entity that appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/932/CFSP (1) as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/420 (2) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2022/419 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen.

On 28 February 2022, the United Nations Security Council Committee, established pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 2140 (2014), added one entity to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

The entity concerned may submit at any time a request to the UN Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 2140 (2014), together with any supporting documentation, for the decision to include it in the UN list to be reconsidered. Such request should be sent to the following address:

| Focal Point for De-listing |
| --- |
| Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch |
| Room DC2 2034 |
| United Nations |
| New York, N.Y. 10017 |
| United States of America |

Focal Point for De-listing

Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch

Room DC2 2034

United Nations

New York, N.Y. 10017

United States of America

Tel. +1 917 367 9448

Fax +1 917 367 0460

Email: delisting@un.org

For more information, see: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/fr/sanctions/2140/materials/procedures-for-delisting.

Further to the UN decision, the Council of the European Union has determined that the entity designated by the UN should be included in the lists of persons and entities which are subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/932/CFSP as implemented by Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/420 and Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/419. The grounds for listing of the entity concerned appear in the relevant entry in the Annex to the Decision and in Annex I to the Regulation.

The attention of the entity concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The entity concerned may submit to the following address a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include it on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the entity concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 147.

(2)  OJ L 86, 14.3.2022, p. 4.

(3)  OJ L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 60.

(4)  OJ L 86, 14.3.2022, p. 1.

---

European Commission

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 March 2022

(2022/C 120/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0960 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83915 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5368 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0249 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8588 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,890 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 373,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7218 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,2000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5137 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3978 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5815 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6130 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4947 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 357,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5029 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9738 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 678,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6087 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,398 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,590 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5286 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8311 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0960

JPY

Japanese yen

129,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83915

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5368

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0249

ISK

Iceland króna

145,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8588

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,890

HUF

Hungarian forint

373,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7218

RON

Romanian leu

4,9490

TRY

Turkish lira

16,2000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5137

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3978

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5815

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6130

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4947

KRW

South Korean won

1 357,77

ZAR

South African rand

16,5029

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9738

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 678,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6087

PHP

Philippine peso

57,398

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,590

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5286

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8311

INR

Indian rupee

83,9310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

V Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/26

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10644 – TOWERBROOK CAPITAL PARTNERS / NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL / CLOUDMED SOLUTIONS / R1 RCM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 120/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | TowerBrook Capital Partners L.P. (‘TCP’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

TowerBrook Capital Partners L.P. (‘TCP’, United States),

| — | New Mountain Capital, LLC (‘NMC’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

New Mountain Capital, LLC (‘NMC’, United States),

| — | R1 RCM, Inc. (‘R1’, United States), currently ultimately controlled by TCP, |
| --- | --- |

—

R1 RCM, Inc. (‘R1’, United States), currently ultimately controlled by TCP,

| — | Cloudmed Solutions LLC (‘Cloudmed’, United States), currently controlled by NMC. |
| --- | --- |

—

Cloudmed Solutions LLC (‘Cloudmed’, United States), currently controlled by NMC.

TCP and NMC will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of R1 and Cloudmed.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for TCP: providing investment opportunities to clients in large and middle market European and North American companies across a variety of sectors, including healthcare products and services, retail, luxury, financial services consumer goods, telecommunications, media, chemicals, knowledge services and selected industrial segments, |
| --- | --- |

—

for TCP: providing investment opportunities to clients in large and middle market European and North American companies across a variety of sectors, including healthcare products and services, retail, luxury, financial services consumer goods, telecommunications, media, chemicals, knowledge services and selected industrial segments,

| — | for NMC: managing private equity, credit and net lease capital globally across a variety of industries including healthcare, software, business services, information and data, logistics, financial services and environmental services, |
| --- | --- |

—

for NMC: managing private equity, credit and net lease capital globally across a variety of industries including healthcare, software, business services, information and data, logistics, financial services and environmental services,

| — | for R1: providing technology-driven solutions to improve the patient experience and financial performance of hospitals, health systems and medical groups in North America, |
| --- | --- |

—

for R1: providing technology-driven solutions to improve the patient experience and financial performance of hospitals, health systems and medical groups in North America,

| — | for Cloudmed: providing revenue intelligence solutions for healthcare providers in North America. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cloudmed: providing revenue intelligence solutions for healthcare providers in North America.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

Case M.10644 – TOWERBROOK CAPITAL PARTNERS / NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL / CLOUDMED SOLUTIONS / R1 RCM

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/28

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10586 – MGL / MSP / O’CONNOR / MCLAREN RACING)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 120/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | UBS O’Connor LLC (‘O‘Connor’, United States), controlled by UBS AG (‘UBS’, Switzerland); |
| --- | --- |

—

UBS O’Connor LLC (‘O‘Connor’, United States), controlled by UBS AG (‘UBS’, Switzerland);

| — | MSP Racing Holdings, L.P. (‘MSP’, United States); |
| --- | --- |

—

MSP Racing Holdings, L.P. (‘MSP’, United States);

| — | McLaren Group Limited (‘MGL’, United Kingdom), controlled by Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C.(c) (‘Mumtalakat, Bahrain’); |
| --- | --- |

—

McLaren Group Limited (‘MGL’, United Kingdom), controlled by Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C.(c) (‘Mumtalakat, Bahrain’);

| — | McLaren Racing Limited (the ‘JV’, United Kingdom). |
| --- | --- |

—

McLaren Racing Limited (the ‘JV’, United Kingdom).

O’Connor, MSP and MGL (together, the ‘Notifying Parties’) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the JV (the ‘Transaction’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of contract or any other means.

2.

| — | for O’Connor: a US-based investment adviser providing investment advisory services to its clients, which include investment funds and sophisticated investors, |
| --- | --- |

—

for O’Connor: a US-based investment adviser providing investment advisory services to its clients, which include investment funds and sophisticated investors,

| — | for MSP: a US-based privately held investment advisory firm which manages investments in professional sports teams, leagues, and businesses in the sports ecosystem, |
| --- | --- |

—

for MSP: a US-based privately held investment advisory firm which manages investments in professional sports teams, leagues, and businesses in the sports ecosystem,

| — | for MGL: holding company for the business activities of the McLaren group. The McLaren group’s business comprises two key divisions, i.e. (i) McLaren Automotive Limited, a provider of luxury high performance cars; and (ii) the JV, |
| --- | --- |

—

for MGL: holding company for the business activities of the McLaren group. The McLaren group’s business comprises two key divisions, i.e. (i) McLaren Automotive Limited, a provider of luxury high performance cars; and (ii) the JV,

| — | for the JV: the development, production, racing and marketing in connection with its participation in Formula 1 motorsport. In addition to its Formula 1 business, McLaren Racing is also active in other motorsport leagues such as the US-based IndyCar Series where McLaren Racing currently cooperates with, and provides technical support to, the US racing team Arrow McLaren SP. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the JV: the development, production, racing and marketing in connection with its participation in Formula 1 motorsport. In addition to its Formula 1 business, McLaren Racing is also active in other motorsport leagues such as the US-based IndyCar Series where McLaren Racing currently cooperates with, and provides technical support to, the US racing team Arrow McLaren SP.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10586 – MGL / MSP / O’CONNOR / MCLAREN RACING

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---