alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013143EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 143/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 143/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Avery Joe LAIL, Jr.

No. 47P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 20, 2017

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Lail, Avery Joe (Jr.).

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

David J. Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd of February 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*928"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
Order filed September 17, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00872-CR

____________

COURTNEY LEE HICKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1520060

ORDER

The opinion in this case was issued on August 29, 2019. On September 10, 

2019, the pro se appellant filed a motion to extend time to file his “brief 

information.” We construe the motion as one to extend time to file a motion for 

rehearing, and we grant the motion to extend the deadline until October 16, 2019.

Appellant is ordered to file any motion for rehearing on or before October 16, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
In the MATTER OF: R.A.S.

No. COA16-805

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 7, 2017

VACATED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SONIA BAUTISTA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-15-00362-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#20130D03636) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Raeshaun Valentine SCOGINS

No. COA17-526

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Arnold GILLESPIE, Defendant.

No. COA16-881

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4008 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

Federal mandates, direction, or control of specific instructional content, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2014 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to prohibit Federal mandates, direction, or control of specific instructional content, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Educational Freedom 

5 Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4008 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL MANDATES, DI2 RECTION, OR CONTROL. 

3 Subpart 2 of part E of title IX of the Elementary 

4 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7901 

5 et seq.) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating sections 9534, 9535, and 

7 9536 (20 U.S.C. 7914, 7915, and 7916), as sections 

8 9535, 9536, and 9537, respectively; and 

9 (2) by inserting after section 9533 (20 U.S.C. 

10 7913) the following: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 9534. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL MANDATES, 

12 DIRECTION, OR CONTROL. 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No officer or employee of the 

14 Federal Government shall, directly or indirectly, through 

15 grants, contracts, or other cooperative agreements, man16 date, direct, incentivize, or control a State’s, local edu17 cational agency’s, or school’s specific instructional content, 

18 academic standards and assessments, curricula, or pro19 gram of instruction (including through any requirement, 

20 direction, incentive, or mandate to adopt the Common 

21 Core State Standards developed under the Common Core 

22 State Standards Initiative or any other academic stand23 ards common to a significant number of States) nor shall 

24 any provision of this Act be construed to authorize such 

25 an officer or employee to do so. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4008 IH

1 ‘‘(b) FINANCIAL SUPPORT.—No officer or employee 

2 of the Federal Government shall, directly or indirectly, 

3 through grants, contracts, or other cooperative agree4 ments, make financial support available in a manner that 

5 is conditioned upon a State’s, local educational agency’s, 

6 or school’s adoption of specific instructional content, aca7 demic standards and assessments, curriculum, or program 

8 of instruction (including any requirement, direction, or 

9 mandate to adopt the Common Core State Standards de10 veloped under the Common Core State Standards Initia11 tive, any other academic standards common to a signifi12 cant number of States, or any assessment, instructional 

13 content, or curriculum aligned to such standards) even if 

14 such requirements are specified in an Act other than this 

15 Act, nor shall any provision of this Act be construed to 

16 authorize such an officer or employee to do so.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the Matter of S.L.C.

No. COA15-1174.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 53/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 53 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5126 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 53

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5126 February 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS |
| | 72nd plenary session held on 28 and 29 November 2007 |
| 2008/C 053/01 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Green paper on Satellite Navigation Applications’ | 1 |
| 2008/C 053/02 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Fourth Report on Economic And Social Cohesion’ | 6 |
| 2008/C 053/03 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Community strategy 2007-2012 on health and safety at work’ | 16 |
| 2008/C 053/04 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Adapting to climate change in Europe — Options for EU actions’ | 21 |
| 2008/C 053/05 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘A European agenda for culture in a globalising world’ | 25 |
| 2008/C 053/06 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Education and awareness-raising promoting sustainable development’ | 29 |
| 2008/C 053/07 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Ageing well in the information society’ | 40 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

72nd plenary session held on 28 and 29 November 2007

2008/C 053/01

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Green paper on Satellite Navigation Applications’

1

2008/C 053/02

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Fourth Report on Economic And Social Cohesion’

6

2008/C 053/03

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Community strategy 2007-2012 on health and safety at work’

16

2008/C 053/04

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Adapting to climate change in Europe — Options for EU actions’

21

2008/C 053/05

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘A European agenda for culture in a globalising world’

25

2008/C 053/06

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Education and awareness-raising promoting sustainable development’

29

2008/C 053/07

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Ageing well in the information society’

40

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Glenn TURNER

No. 440PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Daniel Lawrence Spiegel, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Turner, Christopher Glenn.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 6th of December 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of January 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the annual report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such year and the results of
operations of the Registrant of such year.
  /s/ Deirdre Y. GillespieDeirdre Y. GillespiePresident, Chief Executive Officer and
Assistant Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gail A. SloanGail A. SloanChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
           (PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

      I, Robert W. DeCook, certify that:

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horizon
      Financial Services Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Financial
      Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.

Date: September 29, 2003

                                                    /s/ Robert W. DeCook
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

      I, Vicki Hladik, certify that:

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horizon
      Financial Services Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Financial
      Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.

Date: September 29, 2003

                                                     /s/ Vicki Hladik
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       54
# C_2009180EN.01004701.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/47

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 June 2009 — Korsch v OHIM (PharmaResearch)

(Case T-464/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the community word mark PharmaResearch - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)

2009/C 180/86

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Korsch AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Grzam, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 October 2007 (Case R 924/2007-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign PharmaResearch as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Korsch AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Korsch AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.02.2008.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas Anthony BORSELLO

No. COA17-40

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Rhoden REDDICK, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA16-451

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W.
MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P.
(the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.



I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/    CURTIS W.
MEWBOURNEName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

November 14, 2005
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<PAGE>   2


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                         ABR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
                                                                         --------------------------------------------
                                                                             1995           1996              1997
                                                                             ----           ----              ----
<S>                                                                      <C>              <C>             <C>
Primary:
  Average shares outstanding                                                19,680,322     22,353,988      27,320,151
  Net effect of dilutive stock options  -
     based on the treasury stock
     method using average market price                                         321,168        713,066         494,643
                                                                         -------------    -----------     -----------
        TOTAL                                                               20,001,490     23,067,054      27,814,794

Net income per financial statements                                        $ 2,793,679    $ 5,673,783     $12,228,652

Per share amount                                                                  $.14           $.25            $.44
                                                                                  ====           ====            ====


Fully Diluted:
  Average shares outstanding                                                19,680,322     22,353,988      27,320,151
  Net effect of dilute stock options - based
     on the treasury stock method
     using the year end price, higher
     than average market price                                                 435,922        804,862         609,975
                                                                         -------------    -----------     -----------
        TOTAL                                                               20,116,244     23,158,850      27,930,126

Net income per financial statements                                        $ 2,793,679    $ 5,673,783     $12,228,652

Per share amount                                                                  $.14           $.25            $.44
                                                                                  ====           ====            ====
</TABLE>
Filed 10/24/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 193

Shannon J. Horton, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Alisah A. Horton, n/k/a 

Alisah A. Schaefer, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20080087

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Robin A. Schmidt, Vogel Law Firm, 218 NP Avenue, P.O. Box 1389, Fargo, ND 58107-1389, for plaintiff and appellant.

Benjamin E. Thomas, Wold Johnson, P.C., 400 Gate City Bldg., P.O. Box 1680, Fargo, ND 58107-1680, for defendant and appellee.

Horton v. Horton

No. 20080087

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Shannon J. Horton appeals the district court’s order rejecting the judicial referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law changing the parties’ minor child’s surname to reflect his father’s surname.  Horton argues that the district court erred in relying on factual inaccuracies and that its decision is induced by an erroneous view of the law.

[¶2]The district court’s order is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Dale V. Sandstrom

Bruce B. Haskell, D.J.

[¶4]The Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, D.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136653 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. a Protected Person, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136653 

 COA: 274708 
 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM 

BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

JOHN CHARLES HEISER, M.D., WEST 

MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS,

GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF 

MANSOUR, M.D., VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, 

P.C., and SPECTRUM HEALTH

BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on November 19, 2008, at 9:30 a.m., on whether to grant the application or take 

other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address 

whether the complaint was filed prematurely. 

We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together 

with the cases of Bush v Shabahang, Docket Nos. 136617 and 136983. The parties may 

file supplemental briefs no later than November 12, 2008. They should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers. 

d1014 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2008 

Clerk
FERRELL v. STATE, et al.

172P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Dwain Cornelius Ferrell, for Ferrell, Dwain Cornelius

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of June 2017 by Plaintiff for Complaint Civil Action:

*393"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Exhibit 21


                                    PennFed Financial Services, Inc.

                                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                                           Percentage          State
                                                                               of         of Incorporation
           Parent                               Subsidiary                  Ownership     or Organization
--------------------------------    ----------------------------------     ----------     ----------------
<S>                                 <C>                                        <C>        <C>
PennFed Financial Services, Inc.    Penn Federal Savings Bank                  100%       United States

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.    PennFed Capital Trust II                   100%       Delaware

PennFed Financial Services, Inc.    PennFed Capital Trust III                  100%       Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank           Penn Savings Insurance Agency, Inc.        100%       New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank           Ferry Development Holding Co.              100%       Delaware

Penn Federal Savings Bank           Eagle Rock Investment Corp.                100%       New Jersey

Penn Federal Savings Bank           PennFed Title Service Corporation          100%       New Jersey


</TABLE>