alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4398 

To prohibit the National Telecommunications and Information Administration 

from relinquishing responsibility with respect to the Internet Assigned 

Numbers Authority functions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2014 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the National Telecommunications and Information Administration from relinquishing responsibility with 

respect to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority 

functions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Internet Free5 dom Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘GIF Act of 2014’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4398 IH

1 SEC. 2. NTIA PROHIBITED FROM RELINQUISHING RESPON2 SIBILITY FOR IANA FUNCTIONS. 

3 The Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Commu4 nications and Information may not relinquish the respon5 sibility of the National Telecommunications and Informa6 tion Administration with respect to the Internet Assigned 

7 Numbers Authority functions, including the following: 

8 (1) Coordination of the assignment of technical 

9 Internet protocol parameters. 

10 (2) Performance of administrative functions as11 sociated with Internet domain name system root 

12 zone management. 

13 (3) Allocation of Internet numbering resources. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
MultiSol-2013.01.31 EX 10.1 Amend Revolver


EXHIBIT 10.3


                        








May 7, 2013






Multi Solutions II, Inc.
100 SE 2nd Street, 32nd Floor
Miami, FL 33131




Re:  Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note




Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the "Revolver") dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $200,000 to $250,000.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Amendment No. 2 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


	
				
	BORROWER:

	 

	MULTI SOLUTIONS II, INC., a Florida Corporation

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Robert M. Lundgren

	 
	 
	Name:
	Robert M. Lundgren

	 
	 
	 
	Director

	 
	 
	 
	 

	LENDER:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Marc N. Bell

	 
	 
	Name:
	Marc N. Bell

	 
	 
	 
	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
# Official Journal C 156/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 156 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 658 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 156

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 658 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2022/C 156/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2022/C 156/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Intellectual Property Office for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2 ( OJ C 36, 24.1.2022 ) | 7 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Intellectual Property Office for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2 ( OJ C 36, 24.1.2022 )

( OJ C 36, 24.1.2022 )

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 21

                      LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST
               LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Liberty Property Trust
Liberty Property Limited Partnership
Liberty Lehigh Partnership
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership II
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership III
Liberty Property Philadelphia Corporation
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership IV East
Liberty Property Philadelphia Limited Partnership IV West
Liberty Property Philadelphia Corporation IV East
Liberty Property Philadelphia Corporation IV West
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust IV East
Liberty Property Philadelphia Trust IV West
Liberty 2001 Corp.
Liberty Property Development Corp.
Liberty Property Development Corp. II
Liberty Property Development Corp. III
Liberty Special Purpose Trust
Liberty Property Scottsdale Limited Partnership
Liberty UK Development Corp.
LP Malvern Limited Partnership
LP Malvern LLC
Land Holdings Realty LLC
Rivers Business Commons Associates Limited Partnership
Aymer House Ltd.
Order entered September 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01430-CR

No. 05-12-01603-CR

NAKIA LASHUAN FRANKLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 416-81048-2008, 416-81072-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES these appeals.

On August 14, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the availability 

of the reporter’s record from the June 19, 2008 guilty plea hearing. On September 4, 2013, we 

received the record of the plea hearing. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we 

VACATE the August 14, 2013 order requiring findings.

We ORDER appellant to file a brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1149 Lower Tribunal No. F14-700

________________ 

### Edward R. Brown, Petitioner, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Respondent. A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus. Edward R. Brown, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

                      LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of Liberty
Property Trust (the sole general partner of the Company), certify, in connection
with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that
based on my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
------------------------------------
George J. Alburger, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Liberty Property Trust, its sole general partner

Date: March 10, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. Abdullah HAMID (Aka: Antonio Mosley)

No. 322P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mr. Antonio Mosley, for Hamid, Abdullah (aka Antonio Mosley).

Mr. R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for the State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of September 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of September 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00040-CV

RR Stanley, Dalton Davis d/b/a JO-DAN Royalty Company and Vinella Davis

v.

Deborah Cephus Collins, Will Cephus, Harold Andrews, Rosalind Carter and 

Rondal Cephus

On Appeal from the

77th District Court of Freestone County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-050-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants, RR Stanley, Dalton Davis d/b/a JO-DAN Royalty Company and 

Vinella Davis. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 7, 2019
#### STATE ex rel. Laymond WASHINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002-KH-2333.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 2003.

In re Washington, Laymond; — -Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 391-571; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-1243.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,608
<SECURITIES>                                     2,112
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (191)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,585
<PP&E>                                           3,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (863)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,318
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,302)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,930
<SALES>                                          7,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,882
<CGS>                                              330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)


</TABLE>
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4323 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith 

Act of 2004, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4323 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Reau3 thorization Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination 

6 Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(3)— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

9 ‘‘2010 through 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2014 

10 through 2019’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

12 ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘2009 through 

14 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 2019’’. 

15 SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION. 

16 Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice 

17 Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking 

18 ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 

19 2019’’. 

20 SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS. 

21 Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice 

22 Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking 
3 

•HR 4323 EH

1 ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 

2 2019’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4323 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize programs authorized under the 

Debbie Smith Act of 2004, and for other purposes.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

RICHARD BLANCH, VIVIANNA 

BLANCH, RED BRIDGE & 

STONE, LLC and CLOVIS 

HOLDINGS LLC, 

Defendants, Nominal 

Defendant, Counterclaim and 

Third-Party Plaintiffs Below/ 

Appellants, 

v. 

STONE & PAPER INVESTORS, 

LLC, and CLOVIS HOLDINGS, 

LLC, 

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim 

Defendants Below/Appellees, 

and 

JAD TRADING LLC, DIAMOND 

CARTER TRADING, LLC, JOHN 

DIAMOND, KANOKPAN 

KHUMPOO, ALBERT CARTER, 

ELIZABETH CARTER, 

EISENBERG & BLAU CPAS, P.C., 

RICHARD EISENBERG, and DDK 

& COMPANY, LLP, 

Counterclaim and Third-Party 

Defendants Below/Appellees. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 262, 2023 

§ 

§ Court Below—Court of Chancery 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ C.A. No. 2018-0394 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: January 24, 2024 

 Decided: February 7, 2024 
2 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices. 

ORDER

 

 This 7th day of February, 2024, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion dated June 20, 2020; telephonic rulings 

and order dated November 18, 2020; post-trial Memorandum Opinion dated July 30, 

2021; Order Denying Motions for Reargument dated September 17, 2021; 

Telephonic Bench Ruling dated December 27, 2021; Order dated June 1, 2022; 

Bench Ruling and Orders dated December 5, 2022; Order Denying Motions for 

Reargument dated February 1, 2023; Letter Decision dated April 6, 2023; and Order 

and Final Judgment dated July 7, 2023. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
Pamela Sue White EAGLE, Plaintiff, v. James Arthur EAGLE, Defendant.

No. COA16-1315

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

DISMISSED.
#### In the Matter of Donna Lynne SMITH. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 50 DB 2003.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 1, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2003, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 27, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that DONNA LYNNE SMITH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6144

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY ELLIS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-36-D, CA-99-981) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Paul Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ellis , Nos. CR-94-36-D; CA-99-981 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1896/2005

of 18 November 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 887/2005 opening crisis distillation as provided for in Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 for certain wines in Greece

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular Article 33(1)(f) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The first paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 887/2005 is hereby replaced by the following:

‘1.   The quantities of wine covered by approved contracts shall be delivered to the distilleries not later than 31 January 2006. The alcohol obtained shall be delivered to the intervention agency in accordance with Article 6(1) not later than 15 March 2006.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 15 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 148, 11.6.2005, p. 34.

----
State of North Carolina v. Gary Arthur Metzger

No. COA15-1093

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Stephen David BROWN

No. 254P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Matthew C. Suczynski, Michael Robert Paduchowski, Attorneys at Law, Chapel Hill, for Brown, Stephen David.

Ashleigh P. Dunston, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 25th of July 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is *521"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of July 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Peter P. BARNETT, Respondent.

No. 854 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board File No. C2-03-185, it is hereby

ORDERED that Peter P. Barnett is transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E. Said transfer is effective immediately. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings shall meanwhile be held in abeyance except for the perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41052

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS TORRES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-403-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Torres has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Torres has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk