alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 01 72 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ISAIAH JAMES PEHRINGER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 30 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 25 2024

07/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0172
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.42

                            FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
               REUTERS NEWMEDIA INC. ON-LINE DIRECTORY AGREEMENT
                       BETWEEN REUTERS NEWMEDIA INC. AND
                                 INFOSEEK CORP.

This agreement, dated August 30, 1996, amends the February 28, 1995 Reuters
NewMedia Inc. On-line Service Agreement ("February 1995 Agreement") as amended
by Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 dated January 4, 1996 and April 19, 1996,
respectively, between REUTERS NEWMEDIA INC., a Delaware corporation having its
principal office at 1700 Broadway, New York, New York 10019 and INFOSEEK CORP.,
with its principal office at 2620 Augustine Dr. #250; Santa Clara, CA 95054 is
hereby further amended by this Amendment No. 4. Capitalized terms not herein
defined shall have the same meaning as set forth in the November 1995
Agreement.

1.  Schedule 1 of the February 1995 Agreement is amended to include the [ * ]
    for use in Infoseek Personal* as [ * ] provided under the Agreement.

    *Also known as Infoseek Your News

2.  Schedule 4 of the February 1995 Agreement is amended to include the
    following:

    During the period through February 28, 1997, Distributor shall pay for the
    Reuters World Service a monthly fee equal to the greater of (a) [ * ] or
    (b) [ * ] arising out of to the sale or rental of Advertising Space on
    pages containing the Reuters World Service. Effective [ * ] Distributor
    shall pay for the Reuters World Service [ * ] of Distributor's Net
    Advertising Receipts arising out of the sale or rental of Advertising
    Space on pages containing the Reuters World Service. Distributor shall have
    the [ * ] upon 30 days prior written notice to Reuters.

3.  Except as set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the November 1995
    Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.



Accepted and Agreed on                          Accepted and Agreed on
Behalf of Reuters NewMedia Inc.                 Behalf of Infoseek Corp.

By:  /s/ Andrew M. Niblz                        By:  /s/ Andrew E. Newton
   ------------------------------                  ---------------------------
Name:  Andrew M. Niblz                          Name:  Andrew E. Newton
       --------------------------                      -----------------------
Title: Exec. V.P.                               Title: V.P. & General Counsel
       --------------------------                      -----------------------
Date:  9/25/96                                  Date:  August 30, 1996
       --------------------------                      -----------------------


* Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with
  the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
  omitted portions.
# L_2013135EN.01S00301.xml

| 22.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 135/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 135/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
Mary KEELS, Plaintiff, v. Daralick Lajon FRAZIER, individually and as an employee of the Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Irwin Carmichael, individually and in his official capacity, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, and Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Department, Defendants.

No. COA16-978

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

AFFIRMED.
GROVE PROPERTY TRUST
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Grove Operating L.P.
Grove Avon Associates Limited Partnership
Avonplace Associates Limited Partnership
Foxwoodburg Limited Partnership
Grove Opportunity Fund II Limited Partnership
Shoreline London Associates Limited Partnership
Nautilus Properties Associates Limited Partnership
Grove-Longmeadow Associates Limited Partnership
GR-Farmington Summit Associates Limited Partnership
GR-Enfield Associates Limited Partnership
Grove Properties III Limited Partnership
GR-Properties III Limited Partnership
Grove Westwynd Associates Limited Partnership
GR-Westwynd Associates Limited Partnership
Grove-Westfield Associates Limited Partnership
Grove -West-Springfield Associates Limited Partnership
GR-Norttheast Associates Limited Partnership
GR-West Hartford Associates Limited Partnership
GR-Heritage Court Associates Limited Partnership
Grove Rocky Hill Associates Limited Partnership
GPT-Windsor, LLC
GPT Highmeadow, LLC
Wharf Holding Company, LLC
GPT-Acton, LLC
GPT-Ribbon Mill, LLC
GPT-Hilltop, LLC
GPT-Briar Knoll, LLC
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10896 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

VALERIE ANN SALAZAR

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 41

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Valeri e Ann Salazar

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salazar h a s not filed a response . We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 6, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10896 Document: 00514418855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2018No. 17

- 10896

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10896 Document: 00514418855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2018
The Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3071

___________

Gregory Teamer, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

 * Western District of Missouri.

Paul Konstance, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: September 30, 1997

 Filed: October 3, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Teamer, a Missouri prisoner formerly incarcerated at Algoa

Correctional Center (ACC), appeals from the District Court&s adverse grant of

1

summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action against Paul

Konstance, a corrections officer at ACC.
-2-

This court reviews de novo the District Court&s grant of summary judgment. See

Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 446 (8th Cir. 1996). Summary judgment is appropriate

only when the moving party demonstrates there is no genuine issue of material fact, and

it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

In his complaint, Teamer alleged he suffered injuries and was subjected to cruel

and unusual punishment when Konstance held Teamer and allowed William Bible,

another inmate, to hit Teamer. To prevail on his Eighth Amendment claim, Teamer

needed to show Konstance acted with deliberate indifference of Teamer&s safety;

specifically, that Konstance acted or failed to act despite knowing that Teamer faced

a risk of being assaulted. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837-38 (1994).

The evidence submitted by the parties, taken in the light most favorable to

Teamer, see Miller v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1020, 1023-24 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S.

841 (1984), shows that he and Bible were fighting when they fell into Konstance, and

Konstance restrained Teamer, placing himself between Teamer and Bible, but no one

restrained Bible. Bible then reached over Konstance&s shoulder and “sucker

punche[d]” Teamer, which Teamer admitted was a surprise. We conclude this

evidence cannot support the conclusion that Konstance knew Bible continued to pose

a danger to Teamer, once Konstance had interceded. Accordingly, the District Court

did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Konstance. 

After carefully reviewing Teamer&s remaining arguments, we find they are

without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2018142EN.01000101.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 142/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 134, 16.4.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 123, 9.4.2018

OJ C 112, 26.3.2018

OJ C 104, 19.3.2018

OJ C 94, 12.3.2018

OJ C 83, 5.3.2018

OJ C 72, 26.2.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2448

_____________________________

L.H. grandmother of D.S., D.S.,

D.S. and D.S.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Department of Children and Families.

Mike Carroll, Secretary.

April 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

L.H., pro se, Appellant.

Michael A. Lee, Chief Legal Counsel, Department of Children 

and Families, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 31

                    Sarbanes-oxley section 302 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, George B. Lemmon, Jr., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Owosso
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit
committee of registrant's board of directors:

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2004

                        /s/ George B. Lemmon, Jr.
                            -------------------------------------
                            George B. Lemmon, Jr.
                            President, Chief Executive Officer (principal
                            executive officer, principal financial officer and
                            principal accounting officer) and Chairman
STATE of North Carolina v. Shenandoah FREEMAN, Defendant.

No. COA17-347

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

NO ERROR.
# C_2009153EN.01003901.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 April 2009 — Tailor v OHIM (Representation of a left pocket)

(Case T-282/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing a left pocket - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

2009/C 153/75

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tom Tailor GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S.O. Gillert, K. Vanden Bossche and F. Schiwek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 May 2007 (Case R 669/2006-1), concerning registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing a left pocket.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly devoid of any legal basis; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly devoid of any legal basis;

| 2. | Orders Tom Tailor GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tom Tailor GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
In the Matter of K.S.

No. COA15-1165.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Post Of fice Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov 

November 16, 2015 

Honorable Abel Acosta 

Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals 

P.O. Box 12308 

Capitol Station 

Austin, TX 78711 

RE: The State of Texas v. James Alan Jenkins 

Court of Criminal Appeals No. PD-0832-15

 

Dear Mr. Acosta: 

The undersigned made several citation errors in his brief filed 

on Monday, November 2, 2015 and would like to provide the 

following corrections: 

 Alford v. State, 806 S.W.2d 581 (Tex. App. – Dallas 1991), 

aff’d by, 866 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); 

 Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); 

and, 

 Kimbro v. State, 157 Tex. Crim. 438, 249 S.W.2d 919 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1952). 

Yours truly, 

/s/ Jon R. Meador 

JON R. MEADOR 

Assistant Attorney General 

Office of the Attorney General 

Enclosure 

cc: George Sechrist, Attorney for Appellee 

Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney 

PD-0832-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 11/16/2015 11:26:34 AM

Accepted 11/16/2015 11:30:38 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 4 July 2008 – Entrance Services v Parliament**

**(Case T-333/07)**

Public service contracts – Community call for tenders procedure – Repair and maintenance of automatic equipment, joinery and similar equipment in European Parliament buildings in Brussels
– Rejection of a tender – Serious error in professional matters – Article 93 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002

European Communities’ public procurement – Tendering procedure (Council Regulation No 1605/2002, Arts 93(1)(c) and 94; Commission Regulation No 2342/2002, Art. 133)
(see paras 59-77)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ANNULMENT of the decision of the Parliament rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant and awarding the contract to another tenderer in the call for tenders procedure concerning the repair and maintenance of automatic equipment, joinery and similar equipment in European Parliament buildings in Brussels. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Parliament rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding the contract to another tenderer in the call for tenders procedure concerning the repair and maintenance of automatic equipment, joinery and similar equipment in European Parliament buildings in Brussels; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18267
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.062)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.062)



</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 65 E/257)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2896/03

by Patricia McKenna (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(23 September 2003)

Subject:   EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(20 October 2003)

As for all interventions financed under the Structural Funds, the PEACE Programme operates within the legal framework of the Structural Funds' Regulation (1). In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the primary responsibility for the day-to-day management and monitoring of the programme lies with the programme's delivery structures at the regional level, mainly the Managing Authority — the Special Union Programmes Body (SEUPB) — and the Monitoring Committee.

Day-to-day management is exercised within the framework of the Operational Programme document agreed by the Commission and the Irish and United Kingdom governments, which sets out the the priority areas for spending and their financial allocations. The document also sets out the general criteria for the selection of projects. Future detail in this regard is provided in the Programme Complement, which is a document drafted by the Managing Authority and approved by the Monitoring Committee.

The PEACE Programme is subject to the standard audit requirements involving both the Commission and the relevant national or regional audit bodies. SEUPB acts as the overall Programme Managing Authority and therefore has responsibility for all administrative aspects of the programme such as application forms, co-ordination, guidance to intermediary funding Bodies or final beneficiaries. It also implements a number of specific measures, while maintaining a clear administrative separation of duties in accordance with the principles of sound management.

The Department of Environment and Local Government is represented in an advisory capacity on the PEACE Monitoring Committee. It acts as the accountable department for the County Council Task Forces in the Border Region of Ireland; it is not involved directly in the implementation of any measure.

In accordance with the conclusions of the Presidency of the European Council meeting in Berlin in March 1999, the financial allocation for the PEACE Programme is fully additional to the Structural Funds allocation to Ireland and the United Kingdom.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds, OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

----