alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 906 Certification



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a), or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc.



|         |  |                                                                           |  |          |  |                                                                          
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|         |  | /s/    Daniel W. Harness                                                  |  |          |  | /s/    Peter Mainz                                                       
|Name:    |  | Daniel W. Harness                                                         |  | Name:    |  | Peter Mainz                                                              
|Title:   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                                     |  | Title:   |  | Chief Financial Officer                                                  
|Company: |  | Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc. |  | Company: |  | Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc.
|Date:    |  | November 1, 2005                                                          |  | Date:    |  | November 1, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Robert M. Doyle, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coinmach Service Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 8, 2006 /s/ Robert M. Doyle Robert M. Doyle
STATE v. Roger BLACKSTOCK

242P09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Roger Blackstock, for Blackstock.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of June 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Daniel Eban BERGER, Respondent.

No. 783 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 11, 2003.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2003, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, DANIEL EBAN BERGER, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated January 28, 2003, for a period of three months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, DANIEL EBAN BERGER, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.
EXHIBIT 10.4.1

                                  Amendment to
                                Service Agreement
                                  for Retailers

This  Amendment to the Service  Agreement  is entered into by and between  Trans
Union LLC and the undersigned Subscriber, on this 5th day of May 1998.

WHEREAS  the  parties  have  previously  entered  into a Service  Agreement  for
consumer reporting services; and

WHEREAS the State of California has passed new legislation, AB 156, amending the
California   Consumer  Credit   Reporting   Agencies  Act,   requiring   certain
certifications  to be made by retail  sellers who are users of consumer  reports
pertaining to California consumers.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend their Service Agreement as follows:

Subscriber agrees to instruct its employees  responsible for receiving in-person
credit  applications  from  California   consumers,   including  point  of  sale
applications,   to  inspect  the  applicant's  photo   identification  prior  to
requesting a consumer report.

Subscriber will identify to Trans Union, either by subscriber code or by flag on
the  affected  inquiry,  when it  requests  a  report  for an  in-person  credit
application.

In all other  respects,  the Service  Agreement  shall  remain in full force and
effect.

Agreed to on the date first above written.


   IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first written above.


Trans Union LLC                          AVERT, INC.
                                         Subscriber Name


By: /s/ Kevin Lambert                    By:   /s/ Kathryn M. Carlson
   ---------------------------               --------------------------------
Print Name:  Kevin Lambert               Print Name:  Kathryn M. Carlson

Title:  Data Acquisition Specialist    Title: Operations Manager
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Chandler, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 27]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered February 17, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion made on the ground that the People allegedly violated *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83) by waiting until the midst of jury selection to disclose a taped statement of the buyer apprehended in this observation sale, wherein the buyer gave a description of the seller that was somewhat at variance with that of defendant. Standing alone, this hearsay statement was of no exculpatory value. At most, its value to the defense was that it suggested that the buyer might be able to provide exculpatory testimony. However, following an opportunity to hear the tape, defense counsel interviewed the buyer and decided not to call her to the stand. Accordingly, there was no *Brady*violation *(see, People v McKee,*269 AD2d 225, *lv denied*94 NY2d 950). While defendant claims that the disclosure was untimely because it came after he had already conceded the issue of identity during voir dire, the record fails to support that claim. On the contrary, defendant’s hypothetical questions posed to prospective jurors contained no express or implied concession that defendant was the seller.

Defendant’s claim that the observing officer’s on-the-scene and in-court identifications should have been suppressed as the fruits of an unduly suggestive showup is unpreserved for appellate review, as well as being procedurally defective in that it is based on trial evidence, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would *263find that there was a proper confirmatory identification *(see, People v Wharton,*74 NY2d 921; *People v Rampersant,*272 AD2d 202, *lv denied*95 NY2d 870). Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
NUMBER 13-08-00323-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DELIA GORENA, APPELLANT,

v.

BETRESSA BLACKWELL AND 

JESSICA LYNN BLACKWELL, APPELLEES.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yanez, Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Delia Gorena, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against her

in favor of appellee, Betressa Blackwell and Jessica Lynn Blackwell. On August 26, 2008,

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on June 5, 2008, and that the district clerk, Laura Miller, had notified this
2

Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The

Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct

the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was

advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this

notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of October, 2008.
Constance Clement DRURY, Plaintiff, v. Ronald Charles DRURY, et al., Defendants.

No. COA17-273

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED.
H. R. 4032 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To exempt from Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain water transfers by the 

North Texas Municipal Water District and the Greater Texoma Utility Authority, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Invasive Species 

Barrier Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LACEY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1981. 

Section 5 of Public Law 112–237 (126 Stat. 1629) is amended 

by inserting after ‘‘zebra mussels’’ the following: ‘‘and other fish, 

wildlife, and plants present in Lake Texoma that are prohibited 

under section 3 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 3372) or under section 

42 of title 18, United States Code’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sharod James HOOKER, Defendant.

No. COA16-1308

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00286

- CR

Terence W. SPENCER, Jr.
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1678 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court ’ s certification in this appeal states that “ this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” The clerk ’ s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court ’ s certification accurately reflects that the cr iminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “ The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be fi led within thirty (30) days from the date of this order showing appellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— S an Antonio 2003, order). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPEND ED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

____________ _____________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of June, 2019

.__________ _________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BEST FRENCH FRIES, INC. d/b/a DOUGH DOUGH’S DONUTS,

Appellant,

v.

BEALECON CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1765

[July 25, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Carolyn Bell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502020CA011188.

Michael D. Brown of Brown & Associates, North Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

Jerrod M. Maddox and Paula A. Martinez of Dunn Law, P.A., Miami, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Financial Services, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Taras Chebountchak,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of October, 2005.



| | /s/ Taras Chebountchak                             
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Taras Chebountchak                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
# Official Journal L 42/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.042.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5317 February 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.042.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 42

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5317 February 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 132/2010 of 16 February 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EU) No 132/2010 of 16 February 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2010/95/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 28 October 2009 on State aid C 10/07 (ex NN 13/07) implemented by Hungary for tax deductions for intra-group interest
  (notified under document C(2009) 8130)

   (1) | 3 |

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

2010/95/EC

*

Commission Decision of 28 October 2009 on State aid C 10/07 (ex NN 13/07) implemented by Hungary for tax deductions for intra-group interest
  (notified under document C(2009) 8130)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 8130)

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1226/2009 of 20 November 2009 fixing the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea for 2010 (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009) | 20 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1226/2009 of 20 November 2009 fixing the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea for 2010 (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009)

OJ L 330, 16.12.2009

20

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ JOSEPH ANTHONY HOF, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1843

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. NY

- 3330

- 24

- 0071

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is Case: 24-1843 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 09/20/2024H OF V

. MSPB 2

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

September 20, 2024 Date Case: 24-1843 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 09/20/2024
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
        for
        the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra K. Harlow, Chief Financial Officer of Third
        Century Bancorp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Third
                  Century Bancorp.
   /s/
                    Debra K. HarlowDebra
                    K. HarlowVice
                    President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                    Financial Officer)
 
 August
        12, 2005
 
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
        and is not being filed for any other purpose.
# C_2008238EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Lee WILLIAMS

No. 123P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Paul M. Green, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Michael Lee.

Angenette R. Stephenson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Leah Frahm, Intern, Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of April 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
Leonard VINES, Plaintiff, v. Jermaine Antonio MCKOY, Defendant.

No. COA17-555

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

DISMISSED.