alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19274]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5194]


Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; Extension 
of Waiver of Missile Proliferation Sanctions Against Chinese Government 
Activities

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made to extend the waiver of import 
sanctions against certain activities of the Chinese Government that was 
announced on September 19, 2003, pursuant to the Arms Export Control 
Act, as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 18, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vann H. Van Diepen, Office of 
Chemical, Biological and Missile Nonproliferation, Bureau of 
International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-
647-1142).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A determination was made on March 17, 2005, 
pursuant to section 73(e) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2797b(e)) that it was essential to the national security of the United 
States to waive for a period of six months the import sanction 
described in Section 73(a)(2)(C) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2797b(a)(2)(C)) against the activities of the Chinese Government 
described in section 74(a)(8)(B) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2797c(a)(8)(B))--i.e., activities of the Chinese government 
relating to the development or production of any missile equipment or 
technology and activities of the Chinese government affecting the 
development or production of electronics, space systems or equipment, 
and military aircraft (see Federal Register Vol. 68, No. 182, Friday, 
Sept. 19, 2003). This action was effective on March 18, 2005.
    On September 14, 2005, a determination was made pursuant to section 
73(e) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2797b(e)) that it is 
essential to the national security of the United States to extend the 
waiver period for an additional six months, effective from the date of 
expiration of the previous waiver (September 18, 2005).
    These measures shall be implemented by the responsible agencies as 
provided in Executive Order 12851 of June 11, 1993.

    Dated: September 21, 2005.
Stephen G. Rademaker,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-19274 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
ACCEPTED 06-15-00074-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 8/6/2015 3:46:51 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Terry ELLISON, Defendant.

No. COA16-879

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 16, 2017

NO PLAIN ERROR.
# Official Journal L 45/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.045.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5516 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.045.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 45

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5516 February 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 116 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform technical prescriptions concerning the protection of motor vehicles against unauthorised use | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 116 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform technical prescriptions concerning the protection of motor vehicles against unauthorised use

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Richard MCCOY

No. 342P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 2017

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, for McCoy, Daniel Richard.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of October 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of December 2017."
Exhibit 32.0  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report)
of TF Financial Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, we, Kent C. Lufkin, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Dennis R. Stewart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ KENT C. LUFKIN
  
  /s/ DENNIS R. STEWARTKent C. Lufkin
  
  Dennis R. StewartPresident and Chief Executive Officer
  
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2010
  
  March 30, 2010
#### State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lucian Agnello, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court

*No. 00-2599-CR.*

*Oral argument December 6, 2002.*

Decided *May 22, 2003.*

2003 WI 44

(Also reported in — N.W.2d —.)

*332For the defendant-appellant there were briefs by *Jerome F. Buting*and *Buting & Williams, S.C.,*Brook-field, and oral argument by *Jerome F. Buting.*

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by *Gregory M. Weber,*assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was *James E. Doyle,*attorney general.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County. Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon E Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abraha-mson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.

¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. *State v. Watson,*209 Wis. 2d 281, 562 N.W.2d 151 (1997) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); *State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.,*191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.

*By the Court.*— The Order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.
#### Andre HARVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 61845.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 19, 2003.

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Patrick Morgan, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., EDWIN H. SMITH and HOWARD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Andre Harvey appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
# Official Journal C 195/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 195 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 195

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 195/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9746 – Fyffes Limited/van Wylick GmbH) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 195/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9696 — ArcelorMittal Neel Tailored Blanks/TT Steel Service India/JV) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 195/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9746 – Fyffes Limited/van Wylick GmbH) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 195/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9696 — ArcelorMittal Neel Tailored Blanks/TT Steel Service India/JV) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 195/03 | Euro exchange rates — 9 June 2020 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 195/03

Euro exchange rates — 9 June 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 195/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9716 – AMS/OSRAM) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 195/05 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 195/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9716 – AMS/OSRAM) (
  1
  )

1

4

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 195/05

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-3 No. 333-59498) and Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
33-96624, 333-48597, 333-52927 and 333-51884) of our report dated February 25,
2003, with respect to the financial statements of MakeMusic! Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
March 26, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00441

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.A. , L.G.S., K.D.T., and M.A., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01981 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ
, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Final Order in Suit Affecting the Parent

- Child Relationship and Order of Terminati on is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against the part y who incurred them. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4

.

SIGNED February 2, 2022.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2004

By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
---------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Christopher D. PRICE, Appellant, v. Susan M. PRICE, Respondent.

No. ED 80900.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

April 8, 2003.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court and Motion to Publish Denied June 10, 2003.

Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.

Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

David A. Bohm, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A, NORTON, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Price appeals the judgment dissolving his marriage to Susan Price.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,900
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         421,265
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           410,497
<LOANS>                                      1,069,820
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,558,763
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,063,600
<SHORT-TERM>                                    69,463
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,717
<LONG-TERM>                                    296,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,558,763
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 78,288
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               27,201
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    68
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               105,557
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              48,648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,918
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           33,639
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      780
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,761
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,457
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,457
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.03
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,670
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,106
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      396
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,209
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,209
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 16.1
                 Letter re: Change in Certifying Accountants


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


      Re.   Massachusetts Fincorp, Inc., Annual Report on Form 10-KSB

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We have read the two paragraphs under the caption "Changes in and 
Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure" in 
the Form 10-KSB relating to the change of independent auditors made in 
1998. With respect to the comments made in such paragraphs, we agree with 
the statements contained therein.


/s/ WOLF & COMPANY, P.C.
WOLF & COMPANY, P.C.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7073

ERIC WILLIAM OWENS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

T. C. SMILEY, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-99-508-3-MU)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric William Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

June 22, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on June 26,2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Eric William Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Owens v. Smiley,

No. CA-99-508-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 26, 2000).* We also deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 150/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6628 April 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6628 April 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2023/C 150/01 | List of the bilateral investment agreements referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2023/C 150/01

List of the bilateral investment agreements referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
State v. Mason White Hyde

88P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016

Mason W. Hyde, James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hyde, Mason White.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of July 2016 by Defendant to Show Cause:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of July 2016."