alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GENERAL MEDIA, INC.

                                                             State or Other
                                                            Jurisdiction of
                                                             Incorporation
   Name                                                     Or Organization
   ----                                                     ---------------

1. General Media Communications, Inc.                       Delaware
2. General Media Films, Inc.                                New York
3. General Media International Financial Services (GMIFS)
      N.V.                                                  Netherlands Antilles
4. General Media (UK), Ltd.                                 United Kingdom
5. Penthouse Clubs International Establishment              Liechtenstein
6. Penthouse Images Acquisition, Ltd.                       New York
7. Penthouse Music, Ltd.                                    Delaware
8. Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc.              New York
9. Pure Entertainment Telecommunications (Curacao) N.V.     Netherland Antilles
10.General Media Entertainment, Inc.                        New York
11.General Media Automotive Group, Inc.                     New York
12.General Media On-Line Services, Inc.                     Delaware
# C_2020423EN.01002301.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Mokotowa w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 12 August 2020 — European Chemicals Agency v Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej

(Case C-392/20)

(2020/C 423/34)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Mokotowa w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: European Chemicals Agency

Defendant: Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 299 TFEU be interpreted as being applicable solely to decisions taken by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank, or is it also applicable to decisions taken by the European Chemicals Agency relating to the imposition of an additional administrative charge? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 299 TFEU be interpreted as being applicable solely to decisions taken by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank, or is it also applicable to decisions taken by the European Chemicals Agency relating to the imposition of an additional administrative charge?

| 2. | Must the provision of Article 299 TFEU that an enforcement clause is to be appended without any formality other than verification of the authenticity of the decision be interpreted as meaning that the national court, when ruling on the enforcement clause and applying national civil-procedure rules, is not entitled to examine whether or not the claim to which the enforceable order relates is time-barred? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the provision of Article 299 TFEU that an enforcement clause is to be appended without any formality other than verification of the authenticity of the decision be interpreted as meaning that the national court, when ruling on the enforcement clause and applying national civil-procedure rules, is not entitled to examine whether or not the claim to which the enforceable order relates is time-barred?

---
In the MATTER OF: O.S.R.

No. COA16-958

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
Chelsea DOOLITTLE v. Robert M. GEORGE, in his Individual Capacity as an Officer of the Hickory Police Department; Vidal A. Sipe, in his Individual Capacity as an Officer of the Hickory Police Department; Frank C. Pain, in his Individual Capacity as an Officer of the Hickory Police Department; and The City of Hickory, a North Carolina Municipality

No. 195PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

Natalia K. Isenberg, Attorney at Law, Bryan T. Simpson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for George, Robert M.

Paul A. Tharp, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Matthew R. Arnold, Attorney at Law, J. Bradley Smith, Attorney at Law, for Doolittle, Chelsea.

Patrick H. Flanagan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Sipe, Vidal A., et al.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of June 2017 by Defendant (Robert M. George) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Robert M. George) on the 15th of June 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Robert M. George) on the 15th of June 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of June 2017 by Defendant (Robert M. George) for Leave to Amend or Supplement Petition for Writ of Certioari, Petition for Writ of Supersedeas, and Motion for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of July 2017 by Defendant (Robert M. George) to File Confidential Material Under Seal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 December 2009 – Cofac v Commission**

**(Case T-159/07)**

ESF – Reduction of financial assistance – Training schemes – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair hearing

Social policy – European Social Fund – Financial assistance for vocational training – Decision to reduce assistance initially granted – Defence rights of beneficiaries – Scope (see paras 33-35, 37, 52)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ANNULMENT of Commission Decision D(2004) 24253 of 9 November 2004 reducing the amount of assistance granted to the applicant by the European Social Fund by Decision No C(87) 0860 of 30 April 1987 for training schemes (file No 870927 P1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cofac – Cooperativa de Formação e Animação Cultural, CRL to pay the costs. |
**EXHIBIT 23-1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CKE Restaurants, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-83666, 333-76884, 333-41266, 333-83621, 333-83601, 333-76377, 333-51103,333-52633, 333-62421, 33-56313, 33-55337, 333-12399, 33-53089-01, 2-86142-01, 33-31190-01, 333-12401, 333-75880, 333-27921, 333-14349, 333-05305, 33-52523 and 33-52519) of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 19, 2003,relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended January 31, 2003, which report appears in the January 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other IntangibleAssets” during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Orange County, California 

March 26, 2003
# C_2009006EN.01002701.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2008 — ecoblue v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (Ecoblue)

(Case T-281/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Ecoblue - Earlier Community word mark BLUE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ecoblue AG (Munich-Bogenhausen, Germany) (represented by: C. Osterrieth and T. Schmitz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 April 2007 (Case R 844/2006-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA and ecoblue AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ecoblue AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ecoblue AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32





CLEAN
POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clean Power Technologies
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Abdul Mitha,  as President and Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      April 8, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/Abdul
      MithaName:
      Abdul MithaTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
Exhibit
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No.’s 333-26743, 333-61467, 333-74490 and 333-118861) of Cenveo, Inc. of our
report dated February 28, 2007, except for Note 2, as to which the date is March
28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Cenveo, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
 
 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
LLP
 
 
 Stamford,
Connecticut
 March
28, 2008
NNN DURHAM OFFICE PORTFOLIO 1, LLC; James Osmond; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 2, LLC; James Sun Yu Lam; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 3, LLC; Gary F. Turtle; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 4, LLC; Sherry L. Turtle; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 5, LLC; Gregory R. Maloney; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 6, LLC; Sharon I. Maloney; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 7, LLC; Ray Miller, Trustee; Patricia M. Miller, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 9, LLC; PCL Property, LLC; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 10, LLC; Frances H. Keiffer, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 11, LLC; Frank A. Norman, Jr.; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 12, LLC; St. Kitts Investments, LLC; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 13, LLC; Fannie B. Blackwelder; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 14, LLC; Barbara L. Davidson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 15, LLC; Frederick J. Hornbacher, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 16, LLC; Roberta Macgregor Masson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 17, LLC; William B. Wachter II, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 18, LLC; Susan B. Wachter, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 19, LLC; Pell/Cruz Investments, Inc. ; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 20, LLC; Jack R. Brown ; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 21, LLC; Patricia A. Brown; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 22, LLC; Jack D. Laflesch, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 24, LLC; Muriel Sample, Successor Trustee; James K. Merrill, Successor Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 26, LLC; C.G.B.M.T. Enterprises, Inc.; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 27, LLC; Susan E. Wagner; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 28, LLC; Frederic J. Van Dis; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 29, LLC; Lawrence A. Wattson, Trustee; Stephanie T. Wattson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 30, LLC; Darrin A. Smith; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 32, LLC; Kenneth Deno Mclamb; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 33, LLC; Cynthia L. Mclamb; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 34, LLC; Mark B. Pista; and Carol E. Pista v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Highwoods DLF 98/29, LLC ; Highwoods DLF, LLC ; Highwoods Properties, Inc.; Grubb & Ellis/Thomas Linderman Graham; and Thomas Linderman Graham Inc.

No. 263P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Thomas H. Stark, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, J. Anthony Penry, Attorney at Law, Seth Allen Neyhart, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC, et al.

Michael T. Medford, Attorney at Law, J. Whitfield Gibson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Grubb & Ellis/Thomas Linderman Graham, et al.

Jonathan D. Sasser, Attorney at Law, Jeremy M. Falcone, Attorney at Law, James Michael Weiss, Attorney at Law, Emily Erixson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 2nd of August 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4323 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 
U.S.C. 14135) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``2010 through 
                2018'' and inserting ``2014 through 2019''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``2018'' and 
                inserting ``2019''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2009 through 2014'' 
        and inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION.

    Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (42 
U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking ``2009 through 2014'' and 
inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS.

    Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (42 
U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking ``2009 through 2014'' and 
inserting ``2015 through 2019''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Eon. J. Franlclin

Spears Chainnan,Subcomodttee on Finance, The senate, Auatln#Texae

Ino. T* 'Ehe

State ulBct+ dtb 8 proprlatlonof Texas, in maTlah to 

### statetbirt, eaolutlon To. a$ em brlitglng

Of #la za3* whlehTa8ap8.napnrsrugt~ agalmt the ,lEsts

FrtmklluBrethers et sl Trn. sbmaara may et al, M f&own lm 7838). T* (2) m& ti February0, 193sr the SnpremeConrt of m oftierhaing granteda rrlt of error in rmeh came8 aimlamed sape on the ground that the zkppllsation for n-&t sf emor ai& not set out that a motion for rabeaFingha4 been flled in the Court Of Cirfl ~eakd. The ranate tae lal3ued from theCourtof Clrll Appeals to tbe?&triot Colvtof Wavis County 011

rfeoaaber

10, 393sEon. J. 

## Frsnldln Spears, Uarch m, l@20, Page 2

It is the opinion Of this department that the judgment I.8final and that the Legislature, if it 80 desires, may appropriate swffioient money fo pay off such lunea-*- 

### verytrulyyours
Order entered January 15 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00047
- CR
EX PARTE BRODEY GARR ETT DUKE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014
- 2
- 0848



### O RDER
The Court has received appellant’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. This is an accelerated criminal appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.
We ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal for inclusion in the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
We ORDER the Grayson County Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of th is order, the clerk’s record containing all the documents related to appellant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus , the trial court’s written order ruling on the application for writ of habeas corpus, and the trial court’s certification of app ellant’s right to appeal

. We ORDER Tammy Allen official court reporter of the County Court at Law No. 2, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either the reporter’s record from thehearing on the pretrial application for writ of habeas co rpus or written verification that no

hearing was conducted on the application. Appellant’s brief is due by FEBRUARY 17, 2015 . The State’s brief is due by MARCH 5, 2015 . If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will be submit ted without that party’s brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 31. 1. The appeal will be submitted, without argument, on April 9, 2015 to a panel consisting of Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 31.2, 39.1.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Carol M. Siebman, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 2; Tammy Allen, official court reporter, County Court at Law No. 2; Wilma Bush, Grayson County Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136498 & (19) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136498 

 COA: 283134 

Macomb CC: 2002-003704-FC 

DAVID ALAN BUTLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF DISH, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          24,919
<SECURITIES>                                       242
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,494)
<INVENTORY>                                     72,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,981
<PP&E>                                         535,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 830,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,081
<BONDS>                                        488,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   830,965
<SALES>                                        208,942<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,731
<CGS>                                          153,094<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               165,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,340
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,165<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (141,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,518
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (91,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (91,537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES SALES OF PROGRAMMING.
<F2>INCLUDES THE COST OF PROVIDING PROGRAMMING.
<F3>NET OF AMOUNTS CAPITALIZED.
</FN>


</TABLE>