alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Walter P.W. Notter, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Clyvia Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/
      Walter P.W. Notter     
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| | Name:  | WALTER P.W. NOTTER               
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial
  Officer              
| | Date:  | June 21, 2008                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth James ROUSE.

No. COA17-176

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

NO ERROR.
# C_2013171EN.01004002.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/40

---

Order of the General Court of 26 April 2013 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-194/07) (1)

1

2013/C 171/81

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.

1

---
----

Action brought on 24 November 2004 by Bouygues SA and Bouygues Télécom against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-475/04)

(2005/C 69/37)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 November 2004 by Bouygues SA, established in Paris, and Bouygues Télécom, established in Boulogne-Billancourt (France), represented by Louis Vogel, Joseph Vogel, Bernard Amory, Alexandre Verheyden, François Sureau and Didier Théophile, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action is brought against Commission decision C(2004)2647 final of 20 July 2004 concluding that aid was not granted by the French State to Orange France and SFR by way of the retroactive reduction in the fee of EUR 4 995 000 000 which each of those operators had undertaken to pay to the French State for the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS) licence awarded to it on 18 July 2001. By the adoption of that decision, the complaint lodged by the applicant companies was rejected.

It is recalled in that regard that the French Government issued two invitations to apply for the award of the UMTS licences. The first, in which Orange France and SFR participated, was launched in August 2000. The amount of the fee had been set at EUR 4 995 000 000 per licence. Bouygues Télécom had decided not to compete on account of the price set. In the second invitation to apply, the amount of the fee was reduced to EUR 619 000 000. Bouygues Télécom was awarded a UMTS licence following that second procedure. However, in the meantime, the French Government decided to align retroactively the amount of the fees provided for in the first procedure with that provided for in the second invitation to apply.

In support of their claims, the applicants plead, first, infringement of Article 87 of the Treaty. They argue in that regard that:

In addition, the applicants submit that, by merely stating, without any further explanation, that the award of the UMTS licences cannot be treated as a market transaction, the defendant, in breach of Article 230 of the Treaty, failed to state proper reasons for its decision.

Finally, the applicants submit that the Commission infringed Articles 87 and 88 EC by not examining the measure at issue by way of the formal review procedure laid down by those provisions.

----
# Official Journal C 93/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.093.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 93 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5628 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.093.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 93

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5628 March 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 093/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  ) | 1 |
| 2013/C 093/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 093/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

)

1

2013/C 093/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4352 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4352

  To require the Government Accountability Office to conduct periodic 
  reviews of the flood insurance rates and flood insurance rate maps 
  under the national flood insurance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2014

   Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mr. Jolly, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. 
  Palazzo, Mr. Marino, and Mr. Rooney) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Government Accountability Office to conduct periodic 
  reviews of the flood insurance rates and flood insurance rate maps 
  under the national flood insurance program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Insurance Integrity Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. GAO REVIEWS REGARDING FLOOD INSURANCE RATES AND RATE MAPS.

    (a) Periodic Review of Rate Tables.--During the 6-month period that 
begins 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 
4 years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct a review of the rate tables established by the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood 
insurance program under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. 4011 et seq.) and in effect at the time of such review, and 
shall make a determination of whether--
            (1) the chargeable premium rates for flood insurance 
        coverage determined by such tables are actuarially sound, based 
        on standard actuarial practices used in the private sector; and
            (2) such chargeable premium rates are sufficient to ensure 
        the long-term financial sustainability of the national flood 
        insurance program.
    (b) Annual Review of Mapping Process and Rate Maps.--During the 6-
month period referred to in subsection (a) and annually thereafter, the 
Comptroller General, in consultation with the United States Geological 
Survey of the Department of the Interior, shall conduct a review of the 
process in effect at the time of such review for establishing and 
updating flood insurance rate maps under the national flood insurance 
program and shall make a determination of the degree of accuracy of 
such mapping process.
    (c) Reports.--For each review conducted pursuant to subsection (a) 
or (b), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Congress a report 
describing the results of the review and the determinations made 
pursuant to the review.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0232. JARVIS WARE v. WHITFIELD SUPERIOR COURT.

On August 11, 2017, the superior court entered an order denying filing of a

mandamus petition submitted by prisoner Jarvis Ware.1 Ware filed an application for

discretionary appeal on November 6, 2017.

2 We lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-

35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made

in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Because this application was filed 87 days after entry of the order Ware seeks to

appeal, it is untimely, and we lack jurisdiction to consider it. Accordingly, this

application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 The order contains a scrivener’s error. Although the caption of the order

suggests it is an order denying filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the

order actually denies filing of Ware’s mandamus petition.

2 Ware filed the application for discretionary appeal in the Supreme Court,

which transferred the matter to this Court.

January 11, 2018

01/11/2018
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Hugh GRISSETT

No. COA16-1305

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 209/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.209.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 209 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5213 August 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.209.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 209

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5213 August 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 739/2009 of 12 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 740/2009 of 12 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 as regards export refunds for milk and milk products | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 739/2009 of 12 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 740/2009 of 12 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 as regards export refunds for milk and milk products

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 28, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 28, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0101. RES-GA NINE, LLC v. JAMES N. THOMPSON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 14A02162
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00271-CV

Villa De Leon Condominiums, LLC, 

Patten Sales and Marketing, LLC, 

and Bill Bridges, Jr.

v.

Michael Stewart and Carrie Stewart

§

§

§

§

§

From the 153rd District Court

of Tarrant County (153-269987-14)

February 19, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

Concurrence by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to compel 

arbitration and stay the trial court proceedings. It is ordered that the order of the 

trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to render an

order in accordance with this opinion.

It is further ordered that appellees Michael Stewart and Carrie Stewart

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.  33-97586,  33-97588 and 333-71453) of
our report dated February 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets
of Western Ohio  Financial  Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related  consolidated  statements of income,  comprehensive  income,  changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended.


/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 30, 2000
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(sitting as a full Court)

of 12 October 2004

in Case C-222/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte, Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)

(Credit institutions - Deposit-guarantee schemes - Directive 94/19/EC - Directives 77/780/EEC, 89/299/EEC and 89/646/EEC - Supervisory measures by the competent authority for the purposes of protecting depositors - Liability of the supervisory authorities for losses resulting from defective supervision)

(2004/C 300/14)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-222/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 16 May 2002, received at the Court on 17 June 2002, in the proceedings between Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte, Christel Mörkens and Bundesrepublik Deutschland — the Court (sitting as a full Court), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, Presidents of Chambers, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 October 2004, in which it has ruled:

----

(1)OJ C 202 of 24.8.2002.

----
# Official Journal L 18/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6323 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 18

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6323 January 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/94 of 22 January 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2078 as regards tariff quotas for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine and derogating from that Implementing Regulation for the quota year 2020 | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/95 of 22 January 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/94 of 22 January 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2078 as regards tariff quotas for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine and derogating from that Implementing Regulation for the quota year 2020

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/95 of 22 January 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Joseph Austin WOOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-1036.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 26, 2003.

*517James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy-Loewinger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See State v. Causey,*503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987); *Byrd v. State,*419 So.2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.
State v. Eric Glenn Lane

606A05-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 12, 2017.

Mr. Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Mr. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, For Lane, Eric Glenn.

Mr. Derrick Mertz, Mr. Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney Generals, Mr. Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, For State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 11th of January 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of January 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 24th day of March 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# L_2008249EN.01S00301.xml

| 18.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Matthew J. MEDLIN v. Donnie HARRISON

No. 351P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 19, 2017.

Matthew J. Medlin, for Medlin, Matthew J.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Harrison, Donnie (Sheriff of Wake)

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 18th of October 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of October 2017."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4120 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4120

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
     To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to extend the 
                            termination date.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ACT TERMINATION DATE 
EXTENDED.
    Section 4(f) of the National Law Enforcement Museum Act (Public Law 
106-492) is amended by striking ``13 years'' and inserting ``16 
years''.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
    The provisions of this Act shall take effect as if this Act were 
enacted on November 8, 2013.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Dora P. Bullock, Petitioner, v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance, Respondent.

No. COA15-1391

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

AFFIRMED.