alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ FRED M. POWELLFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
# C_2022484EN.01004101.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/41

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/23)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Malta

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Malta

Subject of commemoration: The 22nd anniversary of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security.

Description of the design: The design shows three female faces. From the top left to the bottom left are the inscriptions ‘WOMEN’, ‘PEACE’, ‘SECURITY’, the year of issuance ‘2022’ and the name of the issuing country ‘MALTA’. At the centre, underneath the faces, are the inscriptions ‘UNSCR’ and ‘1325’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 65 500

Date of issue: October 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
Shreve v. N.C. Dept. of Justice, et al.

151P14-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Ms. Kimberly Shreve, Pro Se.

Mr. Christopher McLennan, Assistant Attorney General, For N.C. Department of Justice, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of October 2016 by Plaintiff Motion for Opposition to Motion to Dismiss:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
# C_2006326EN.01000601.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Gent (Belgium)) — Mark Kerckhaert, Bernadette Morres v Belgische Staat

(Case C-513/04) (1)

1

(Income tax - Dividends - Tax burden on dividends from shareholdings in companies established in another Member State - No possibility in the State of residence to set off income tax levied at source in another Member State)

(2006/C 326/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Mark Kerckhaert, Bernadette Morres

Applicants:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Gent — Interpretation of Article 56(1) EC — Restriction resulting from a national income tax provision — Domestic and foreign dividends — Uniform tax rate — Tax burden higher in regard to dividends from shareholdings in companies established in another Member State — Taxation at source — Not taken into account — Free movement of capital — Discrimination

Operative part of the judgment

Article 73b(1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 56(1) EC) does not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as Belgian tax legislation, which, in the context of tax on income, makes dividends from shares in companies established in the territory of that State and dividends from shares in companies established in another Member State subject to the same uniform rate of taxation, without providing for the possibility of setting off tax levied by deduction at source in that other Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of CDG Investments Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-20-F for the financial year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





January 15, 2006



/s/ James Devonshire

By:  James Devonshire

President





1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Date and Time: Friday, October 7, 2005, 9:30 a.m.

Place: Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2226, Washington, DC 20515.

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of September 16, 2005 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Commission Briefing: The Voting Rights Act
    <bullet> Introductory Remarks by Chairman
    <bullet> Speakers' Presentations
    <bullet> Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director
V. Staff Director's Report
VI. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Working Group on SAC Reform
    <bullet> Elementary and Secondary School Desegregation Project
VII. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Commission Meeting Dates for Calendar Year 2006
    <bullet> Report on John G. Roberts, Jr., Civil Rights Record
    <bullet> September 15th Report to Congress on Commission Reforms
VIII. Future Agenda Items

Contact Person for Further Information: Terri Dickerson, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8582.

Christopher Byrnes,
Acting Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-19656 Filed 9-27-05; 4:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
DERRICK L. LOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4971

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed February 25, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. J. Bradford Stetson , Judge

.

Derrick L. Lott, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED

.

LEWIS, C. J., BENTON and THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4189 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the 

‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant 

Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4189 EH

1 SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON, MAS2 TER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. RIECK AND VET3 ERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, 

6 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Master Ser7 geant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. 

8 Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Master Sergeant 

13 Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and 

14 Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4189 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostVeterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Ohio, as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. al Service located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard,
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2041

ROZAIN ELIZABETH CASIE CHITTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior 

District Judge. (6:13-cv-00043-NKM)

Submitted: November 14, 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Yurachek, MARK ALLEN YURACHEK & ASSOCIATES, Falls 

Church, Virginia, for Appellant. Calvin Wooding Fowler, Jr., 

Joseph Ray Pope, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rozain Elizabeth Casie Chitty appeals the district 

court’s order dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted. On appeal, Chitty’s sole argument is

that the district court erred in dismissing her complaint

without providing her notice of the court’s intention and an 

opportunity to respond. But under § 1915(e)(2)(B), which 

governs proceedings in forma pauperis, a district court is 

directed to dismiss a case “at any time” if the court finds that 

the case or appeal is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a 

claim, or seeks damages from a party who is immune from such 

relief. Because Chitty moved for and was granted leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, § 1915(e)(2)(B) authorized the sua 

sponte dismissal effected by the district court. See Jones v. 

Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 214 (2007) (noting Prison Litigation Reform 

Act allows sua sponte dismissal of in forma pauperis case for 

failure to state a claim, among other grounds). We therefore 

conclude that Chitty’s argument lacks merit,1 and we affirm the 

district court’s judgment.

 1 Chitty’s brief does not contend that any of her claims 

did, in fact, sufficiently state a claim for relief, and we 

therefore do not address that issue. See Suarez-Valenzuela v. 

Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (holding issues not 

raised in argument section of opening brief are abandoned).
3

We deny Liberty University’s motion to dismiss for 

lack of jurisdiction.2 We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2 Even if the district court’s dismissal without prejudice 

would otherwise be a non-appealable interlocutory order, see

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 

1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993), the applicable two-year statute 

of limitations period on Chitty’s fraud claims has passed. Va. 

Code Ann. § 8.01-243(A) (2013 Cum. Supp.). Thus, we conclude 

that the district court’s dismissal order is effectively final.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-43267), the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 33-94782), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211) of
Liberty Property Trust and Liberty Property Limited Partnership and the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-14139), the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94036), the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-44149), the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282) of
Liberty Property Trust and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
February 5, 2001 (except for Note 12, as to which the date is March 14,
2001), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Liberty Property Trust included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:                August 16, 2010



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00422

- CR

IN RE Richard LARES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On June 2 2, 2018, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition. Accordingly, the petition is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The court’s opinion

will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on June 28, 2018

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEIT H E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No . 2006CR10110, styled The State of Texas v. Richard Lares , pending in the

399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Frank J. Castro presiding.
Order filed, September 29, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00467

- CR

____________
MILLENA R. HEBERT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 1309261



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 6, 2012

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The

record has not been filed with the court. Becau se the reporter’s record has not been filed
timely, we issue the following order.

We order Serena Pace , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
---

---

# Exhibit 4.7

# ENGLISH SUMMARY OF THE
COOPERATION AGREEMENT(ORIGINAL LANGUAGE  HEBREW)

BY AND BETWEEN

# POINTER (EDEN TELECOM
GROUP) LTD.

AND

# NEXUS TELOCATION
SYSTEMS LTD.

Dated February 25, 2004(the
Agreement)

|Description: 
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
Period of Exclusivity:
Supply of End Units: 
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
Term: | Cooperation  Agreement  pursuant to which  Pointer
(Eden  Telecom  Group)  Ltd.   ("Pointer")   shall
purchase   end  units  for  its   stolen   vehicle
retrieval    system    exclusively    from   Nexus
Telocation  Systems  Ltd.  ("Nexus"),   and  Nexus
shall  supply  these  end  units   exclusively  to
Pointer, in Israel.
Until December 31, 2007.
Nexus   shall   supply   Pointer   end   units  in
accordance with quarterly purchase orders.
Under the  Agreement,  Pointer  shall  purchase in
2004   end-units  in  the   aggregate   amount  of
approximately  $2.3  million and from 2005 through
2007,  end-units in the minimum  aggregate  amount
of $4.2 million.
The  Agreement  shall expire  December 31, 2007 at
which  point,  the terms of the  agreement  by and
between  Pointer and Nexus  dated  August 25, 1998
(as amended on June 6, 1999) shall apply.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
CONSENT OF AMEC (PERU) S.A.







To:    
British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Manitoba Securities Commission
         Ontario Securities Commission
         Autorité des marchés financiers
         Toronto Stock Exchange

American Stock Exchange

US Securities and Exchange Commission





I, Douglas Reddy, on behalf of AMEC (Peru) S.A., do hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference of the following document(s) into the annual information form (the AIF) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Issuer) dated March 24, 2005 to be filed with certain Canadian securities commissions and the annual report on Form 40-F (the 40-F) of the Issuer to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith, and (ii) the inclusion of any extracts from or summary of such document(s) in the AIF and the 40-F:

1.  Technical Report on the Bisha Property and Resource Estimate of the Bisha Deposit, dated October 1, 2004

(collectively, the Technical Report)

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written disclosure in the AIF or the 40-F of the Issuer contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.

Dated this30 day of March, 2005.

signed

_______________________
signing officer,

AMEC (Peru) S.A.



[Seal or Stamp]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Sidney
      L. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July
      31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
      Inc.





Date:
                September __, 2008
            /s/
                Sidney L. AndersonSidney
                L. AndersonChief
                Executive Officer and President





I,
      Clayton Woodrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
      ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
      Inc.





Date:
                September __, 2008
            /s/
                Clayton WoodrumClayton
                WoodrumChief
                Financial Officer
State of North Carolina v. David Lawrence Coker, Jr.

No. COA16-180

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.