alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012151EN.01003001.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/30

---

Action brought on 22 February 2012 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-98/12)

2012/C 151/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ehab Makhlouf (Damas, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | In consequence, annul Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 and their subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

In consequence, annul Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 and their subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-433/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 C 290, p. 14.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(C)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Initial Review Group.                    

*Date:*                         October 20-21, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey M. Chernak, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Institute of Nursing Research, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 712, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 20817; (301) 402-6959,                         *chernak@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 21, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-19380 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer    I, Paul Tidwell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: June 14, 2016  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 178A/10 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 178A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6410 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 178A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6410 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2021/C 178 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/262/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) | 1 |
| 2021/C 178 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/263/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) | 6 |
| 2021/C 178 A/03 | Recruitment notice PE/264/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) | 11 |
| 2021/C 178 A/04 | Recruitment notice PE/265/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) | 18 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2021/C 178 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/262/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

1

2021/C 178 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/263/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

6

2021/C 178 A/03

Recruitment notice PE/264/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

11

2021/C 178 A/04

Recruitment notice PE/265/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zvi Fried, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.




March 30, 2011
/s/ Zvi Fried

Zvi Fried

Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136475 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136475 

 COA: 275589 

Wayne CC: 06-009250-01

JOHN HENRY WILLIAMS,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CORRIGAN, J., not participating for the reasons stated in People v Parsons, order 

of the Supreme Court, entered March 6, 2007 (Docket No. 132975). 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 10.3**
**Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**
      Pursuant to the Company’s pre-existing policies, non-employee directors receive $25,000 peryear for serving on the Company’s Board (their “Annual Retainer”). Committee Chairmen receive anadditional $5,000 per year. Non-employee directors receive $2,000 for each regular director meetingattended and $1,000 for each special meeting or committee meeting attended. On May 25, 2004, theCompany adopted the Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “StockIncentive Plan”). Under the Stock Incentive Plan, each non-employee director will receive annually,on January 31, an option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal tothe closing price on the last day of trading in January of that year with a vesting period of oneyear from the date of grant.
      On February 22, 2005, the Compensation Committee recommended and on February 23, 2005, theBoard approved, that in addition to the forgoing, the non-employee directors would receive anannual grant of 1,000 shares of restricted stock and that members of the audit committee wouldreceive an annual grant of an additional 500 shares of restricted stock. This restricted stock willvest on the first anniversary of the grant date, provided however, that the non-employee directormust fulfill his or her term for which the restricted shares were granted in order for therestrictions to be lifted.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
      Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





Date:
                September 3, 2008
            By:
            */s/
                MARK GUSTAFSON*Mark
                GustafsonChief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP
Solar Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Sass Peress, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sass Peress------------------------------- 
Sass Peress 
Chief Executive Officer 
September 15, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Sarah GYEDU-SAFFO, Plaintiff, v. Craig E. DUNCAN, Defendant.

No. COA17-86

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

AFFIRMED.
State v. Zachary David Thomsen

308A15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, for Thomsen, Zachary David.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*315The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of March 2016 by Defendant to Amend Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               VIDEO UPDATE, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             PERCENTAGE 
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                        DIRECT OWNER                       OWNERSHIP
------------------                        ------------                       ---------
<S>                                       <C>                                  <C> 
Tinseltown Video, Inc.                    Video Update, Inc.                   100%
Video Update Canada Inc.                  Video Update, Inc.                   100%
24 Hour Entertainment Group Ltd.          Video Update Canada Inc.             51%
                                          Video Update, Inc.                   49%
24 Hour Entertainment Leasing Ltd.        24 Hour Entertainment Group Ltd.     100%
Williams Video, Inc.                      Video Update, Inc.                   100%
1137239 Ontario Limited                   Video Update, Inc.                   100%
Moovies, Inc.                             Video Update, Inc.                   100%
Moovies of the Carolinas, Inc.            Moovies, Inc.                        100%
Moovies of Georgia, Inc.                  Moovies, Inc.                        100%
Moovies of Iowa, Inc.                     Moovies, Inc.                        100%
Moovies of Michigan, Inc.                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
Movie Warehouse Franchise Systems, Inc.   Moovies, Inc.                        100%
E.C.6., Inc.                              Moovies, Inc.                        100%
SONI, Inc.                                Moovies, Inc.                        100%
PQ3, Inc.                                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
SNO, Inc.                                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
GBO, Inc.                                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
D-Skippy, Inc.                            Moovies, Inc.                        100%
DCO, Inc.                                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
PTO, Inc.                                 Moovies, Inc.                        100%
The Movie Store, Inc. #2                  Moovies of Georgia, Inc.             100%
The Movie Store III, Inc.                 Moovies of Georgia, Inc.             100%
Alpharetta Media Associates, Inc.         Moovies of Georgia, Inc.             100%
Rio Media Associates, Inc.                Moovies of Georgia, Inc.             100%
Pic-A-Flick of Greenville, Inc.           Moovies of the Carolinas, Inc.       100%
</TABLE>
#### Gene HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D03-1876.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 29, 2003.

*553Baya Harrison, III, Monticello, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the appellant’s claims are facially sufficient and the trial court failed to refute the appellant’s claims with record attachments, we reverse.

The appellant was convicted of four counts of DUI manslaughter and one count of DUI with a serious bodily injury. This Court affirmed the appellant’s convictions on direct appeal. *Higginbotham v. State,*757 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (unpublished table decision). The appellant later filed a motion for postconviction relief alleging that his counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness, for failing to object to improper witness testimony, and for failing to file a motion to suppress his statements to the police. The trial court erroneously denied the appellant’s claims as barred because they were raised on direct appeal. While the underlying issues may have been raised on direct appeal, the fact that trial counsel was ineffective in presenting these issues to the trial court was not addressed on direct appeal. *Corzo v. State,*806 So.2d 642, 644-645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); *Thompson v. State,*764 So.2d 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Because all of the appellant’s claims are facially sufficient and the trial court did not consider the merits of the appellant’s claims, we reverse the trial court’s summary denial and remand for the attachment of record portions conclusively refuting the appellant’s claims or for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, C.J., LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

J.M., Appellant 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 

FORESTRY SERVICE, Albuquerque, NM, 

Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 15-0041 

Issued: March 24, 2016 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Thomas P. Fochs, Esq., for the appellant 

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

ORDER OF ERRATUM 

Before: 

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge 

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

On March 10, 2016 the Board issued a decision in the above-entitled matter concerning a 

July 24, 2014 nonmerit decision. 

Upon review of the March 10, 2016 decision, the Board finds that the “Order” section 

was improperly stated. The Board found that OWCP properly denied appellant’s request for 

merit review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a), however in the “Order” section the Board stated 

that the July 24, 2014 nonmerit section was set aside and remanded for further proceedings. The 

Board notes that the “Order” in this case should read “IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the 

decision of the Office of Workers Compensation Programs dated July 24, 2014 is affirmed.” 

The Board will reissue the decision and order correcting the “Order” section to affirm the 

OWCP decision of July 24, 2014. 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Board’s March 10, 2016 decision be reissued. 

Issued: March 24, 2016 

Washington, DC 

 

 Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board
Alexey David MCCOY v. Donnie HARRISON

No. 365P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 27, 2017

Mr. Alexey David McCoy, For McCoy, Alexey David.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For Harrison, Donnie (Sheriff of Wake).

Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 26th of October 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

*298"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of October 2017."