alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 51 4 . DEBRA J . W ALLACE v . DI A NE W A LLACE EPSTEI N et a l

.

On Au g us t 5

, 2 0 1 9

, t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered an ord er g ran t i n g t he d efen d an t s , Di an a E p s t ei n an d Do n n a Ch am b ers , at t orn ey fees u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 5-1 4 (a) an d (b )

t o b e p ai d b y t h e p lai n t i ff, Deb ra W al lace. In t h e o rd er, t h e t ri al co urt res erv ed ru l i n g

o n t he am o u n t o f fees u n t i l aft er an ev i d en t i ary h eari n g

. W al l ace fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n

fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal fro m t h at o rd er, wh i ch t h i s Co urt d en i ed

. See Cas e No

. A2 0 I0 0 2 8 (d eci d ed Sep t

. 20

, 2 0 1 9 ). Aft er an ev i d en ti ary h eari n g, t h e t ri al co u rt

award ed t h e d efen d a n t s $ 28 ,8 2 4 i n at t o rn ey fees

. W al l ace t hen fi l ed t h i s d i rect

ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Ap p eal s fro m ord ers g ran t i n g o r d en y i n g at t orn ey fees an d l i ti g at i o n ex p en s es

u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 m u s t be m ad e b y d i s cret i o n ary ap p li cat i o n , no t d i rect ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 0 ). W al lace’ s fai lu re t o co m p l y w i t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew pro ced ure d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct io n o v er t h i s ap p eal

. See Ca p ri co r n S ys tems

v. Go d a va r t h y , 2 5 3 Ga. Ap p

. 8 4 0

, 8 4 1 (5 6 0 SE2 d 7 3 0 ) (2 0 0 2 ); Jo n es v. P a d g et t

, 1 8 6

Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 2

, 3 6 3 (2 ) (3 6 7 SE2 d 8 8 ) (1 9 8 8 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p e a l i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 16, 2020

11/16/2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin R. Callahan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Affirmative Insurance
Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: August 10, 2009



/s/ Kevin R. CallahanKevin R. CallahanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BOYD TYRONE RUCKER
, P

etitioner

,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent

.

______________________

201 3-3127

______________________

Petition for review of an arbitrator’s decision in No.
131203

- 51687

- 3 by Marvin J. Feldman.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Boyd Tyrone Rucker moves to withdraw his petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b)

. *

Upon consideration thereof

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The petition is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. Case: 13-3127 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 11/05/2014RUCKER v. NAVY 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s2 1

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 5, 2014

* Although Mr. Rucker requests that his petition be dismissed with prejudice, the court does not usually designate voluntary dismissals as being with or without prejudice. Case: 13-3127 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 11/05/2014
SMITH v. YOUNG

223P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Darryl Ray Smith, for Smith, Darryl Ray.

Michael W. Young, for Young, Michael W.

Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of June 2017 by Plaintiff for Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
Eric Jamal WHITLEY v. Donnie HARRISON

No. 386P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 17, 2017

Eric Jamal Whitley, for Whitley, Eric Jamal.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Harrison, Donnie (Sheriff of Wake).

*44***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 16th of November 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of November 2017."
STATE v. John Owen JACOBS

126PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 16, 2017

Paul F. Herzog, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Jacobs, John Owen.

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of August 2017 by N.C. Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of August 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 October 2005

(2005/C 259/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SALOMON MIRANDA REYES,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00014-CR

Appeal from the

291st District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC#F-06-38530-U)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant waived trial by jury and entered an open plea of guilty before the court to the

offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of fourteen. He was convicted, and the

court assessed punishment at imprisonment for life, and a fine of $5,000. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the

record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v.

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.

1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant

has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief

has been filed.

The record reflects that Appellant was admonished of the consequences of his plea pursuant

to TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.13, and Appellant made a judicial confession admitting his
guilt.

The Court of Criminal Appeals directs that we not address the merits of issues raised in

Anders briefs or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005). We may only determine (1) that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion

explaining that we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error; or (2) that arguable grounds

for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief

the issues. Id. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

October 23, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ATANASIO NAVA-VEGA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00110-RJC-1)

Submitted: September 25, 2008 Decided: October 9, 2008

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, Ross H. Richardson, FEDERAL

DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States

Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy E. Ray, Assistant United

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Atanasio Nava-Vega pled guilty to illegal reentry after

deportation following conviction of an aggravated felony, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) (2000), and was sentenced

to fifty-two months’ imprisonment. He now appeals, questioning the

constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) in the wake of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). We affirm. 

Because Nava-Vega did not raise the constitutionality of

§ 1326(b) before the district court, we review for plain error.

See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-32 (1993). Section

1326(a) provides a two-year maximum term of imprisonment for any

alien who illegally returns to the United States after having been

deported. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). If the removal was subsequent to a

conviction for an aggravated felony, the statutory maximum

increases to twenty years. Id. § 1326(b)(2). In Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 233-36, 243-44 (1998), the Supreme

Court held that § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor rather than a

separate criminal offense. We have expressly determined that the

holding in Almendarez-Torres was not overruled by Apprendi and

remains the law. United States v. Sterling, 283 F.3d 216, 220 (4th

Cir. 2002). We therefore conclude that Nava-Vega’s claim is

without merit and affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Sew Cal Logo, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Judy Songer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. Such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
      February 28, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Sew Cal Logo, Inc.

Dated: May 1, 2006


SEW CAL LOGO, INC.

By: /s/ Judy Songer
Chief Financial Officer,
AZIGE, et al. v. HOLY TRINITY ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHDO CHURCH, et al.

368P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Sinead Noelle O'Doherty, Attorney at Law.

Matthew F. Tilley, Attorney at Law, Julian H. Wright, Jr., Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Kassahun, Tassew.

Forrest A. Norman, Attorney at Law.

John T. Holden, Attorney at Law, Joseph L. Nelson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Christopher M. Vann, Attorney at Law, Matthews, for Azige, Animaw, et al.

Earl N. 'Trey' Mayfield, III, Attorney at Law, F. Hill Allen, IV, Attorney at Law, for Gashareba, Tesfa.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of November 2016 by Defendant (Kassahun) to Dismiss Plaintiff Azige's Claims Against All Defendants Without Prejudice:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
BroadVision, Inc.:

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated January 24, 2000,  except with respect to the matter  discussed
in the section  entitled "Stock Splits" in Note 1, as to which the date is March
13,  2000,  included  in this  Form  10-K into the  Company's  previously  filed
Registration Statements, File Nos. 333-62619 and 333-14057.

                                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Jose, California
March 30, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50434 Summary Calendar

ROBERT R. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas (A-96-CV-362)

October 30, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert R. West appeals an adverse summary judgment in his Title VII sex

discrimination lawsuit against Southwestern Bell Telephone Com pany. Having

reviewed the briefs and pertinent parts of the record and finding neither error of law2

nor fact, on the basis of the facts as noted and analysis contained in the Order of the

dis trict court rendered April 24, 1997 and entered April 25, 1997, the judgment

appealed is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4031 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4031

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the removal of 
   Senior Executive Service employees of the Department of Veterans 
            Affairs for performance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Management Accountability Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR PERFORMANCE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 713. Senior Executive Service: removal based on performance
    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary may remove any individual from the Senior Executive Service 
if the Secretary determines the performance of the individual warrants 
such removal. If the Secretary so removes such an individual, the 
Secretary may--
            ``(1) remove the individual from Federal service; or
            ``(2) transfer the individual to a General Schedule 
        position at any grade of the General Schedule the Secretary 
        determines appropriate.
    ``(b) Notice to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after removing an 
individual from the Senior Executive Service under paragraph (1), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the 
Senate and House of Representatives notice in writing of such removal 
and the reason for such removal.
    ``(c) Manner of Removal.--A removal under this section shall be 
done in the same manner as the removal of a professional staff member 
employed by a Member of Congress.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``713. Senior Executive Service: removal based on performance.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4031

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the removal of 
   Senior Executive Service employees of the Department of Veterans 
            Affairs for performance, and for other purposes.
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19562]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission: 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, November 17, 2005.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist Federal, State and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on November 17, 2005 at 7 p.m. at 
Alternatives Unlimited, 54 Douglas Road, Whitinsville, MA 01588 for the 
following reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Chairman's Report.
    3. Executive Director's Report.
    4. Financial Budget.
    5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about twenty-five people will be able to 
attend the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Larry Gall, Interim Executive Director, John 
H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor 
Commission, One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-
0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Larry Gall, Interim Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Larry Gall,
Interim Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. 05-19562 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Richard Pyle, Chief Financial Officer of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town Sports International Holdings,Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;         By: /s/ Richard Pyle       Richard Pyle      Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 3, 2006
34
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-90820,  33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services, Inc.
on  Forms  S-8,  Registration  Statement  No.  333-20499  of  PennFed  Financial
Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration  Statement No. 333-36031 of PennFed
Capital Trust I on Form S-2 of our report dated July 26, 2000, appearing in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of PennFed  Financial  Services,  Inc.  for the year
ended June 30, 2000.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 22, 2000