alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CR-8706, styled State of Texas v. Martin A. Casarez, in the

226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00683-CR

IN RE Martin A. CASAREZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 22, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 9, 2008, relator Martin A. Casarez filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion for reduction of sentence. To obtain a

writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to consider and rule on a motion, a relator must

establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act; (2) was asked

to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do so. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). A trial court is required to consider and rule upon a

motion within a reasonable time. Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). When a motion is properly filed and pending before
04-08-00683-CR

-2-

a trial court, the act of giving consideration to and ruling upon that motion is a ministerial act, and

mandamus may issue to compel the trial judge to act. Id. However, the trial court has a reasonable

time within which to perform this ministerial duty. Id. Here, relator has provided this court with

a copy of the motion he alleges he filed on August 26, 2008. However, relator has not provided this

court with a file stamped copy of the motion, a copy of the trial court’s docket, or any other proof

that he filed the motion and that it is pending before the trial court. It is relator’s burden to provide

this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,

837 (Tex. 1992); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j), 52.7(a). 

Relator has not met his burden of establishing that the trial court is actually aware of the

motion and/or has refused to rule on it, nor has he established any of the circumstances necessary

to establish that his request has been pending for an unreasonable amount of time. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to refile with a sufficient record in

accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.3(j) and 52.7(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135469 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135469 COA: 273181 Wayne CC: 05-011715-01 TYRONE DORSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| February 27, 2009                            |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin R. Callahan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: May 8, 2008



/s/ Kevin R. CallahanKevin R. CallahanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
mondialexh1001.htm



Exhibit 10.01












  


MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION TO AMENDED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT


AMENDED JULY 31, 2014


(Turnkey Drilling, Re Entry, and Multiple Wells)












This Modification and Extension to Amended Participation Agreement dated July 31, 2014 amending the March 26, 2014 Modification and Extension to Amended Participation Agreement is in accordance with Exhibit “B” of an *Asset Purchase Agreement made and entered into as of January 21, 2014, the Effective Date (“Effective Date”), by and among Shale Corp., a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario in Canada with its principal place of business located at 365 Bay St, Suite 400, Toronto On, M5H 2V1(the “Company”), and the Investor acting as Mondial Ventures, Inc., along with approvals from Success Oil Co., Inc., its Operator and Partner, EGPI Firecreek, Inc. via its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc., Partner, and TWL Investments, aLLC, investing participants, herewith amend, modify and extend the following provision to the January 21, 2014 Amended Participation Agreement (please see *Asset Purchase Agreement included as Exhibit A in the Exhibit 10.1 to a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Mondial Ventures, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2014):







Section II. paragraph one shall be modified and extended to read:  







II.  Consideration




  


Participants shall deliver to Operator Participant’s share of the Turnkey Cost to Casing Point for drilling of the first Prospect Well, and the first Program initiated from successful financing will be for the Ellenburger Prospect Well formation at approximately 8,300 foot depth, as provided for in this Agreement and listed as follows in this section II. 1) below within a reasonable time after the execution and effective date of this Agreement not to exceed the period ending August 30, 2014, unless mutually extended by all parties to this Agreement in writing to be attached hereto. In addition, if the Turnkey Costs are delivered for the first Prospect Well listed in II. 1) below, the parties agree to extend timing for agreed participation up to two years but no less than one year. A draft for formal terms will be then delivered by participant 1 in coordination with Success for acceptance by the parties.




  


Agreed this 31st day of July, 2014 by the undersigned:


 


  


  



	
Mondial Ventures, Inc.

	
Success Oil Co., Inc.

	
TWL Investments, a LLC


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
  


/s/Dennis R Alexander

	
  


/s/Jeru M. Morgan

	
  


/s/Larry W. Trapp


	
President and CEO

	
President and CEO

	
Managing Director


	 	 	 
	
Energy Producers, Inc., a wholly owned Subsidiary of EGPI Firecreek, Inc

	 	 
	 	 	 
	
/s/Dennis R Alexander

	 	 
	
Dennis R. Alexander

	 	 
	
President and CEO
Honorable E. L. Bhelton 

County Auditor 

Cleburme, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion Ho. o-2178 

R0: Whether lien instrument dated 

December 1, 1935, has to be 

~stamped under Article 7047e, 

.vernon’B Civil statutes. 

a your letter of April 4, @JO, you request OU+ opinion as to 

whether a deed bated December 1, 1935, ntlpulatlng an assumed consideration 

of $7,000.00 and Welch has never been filed for record but is offered for 

filing at this date is subject to the state stamp tax. 

Article 70b7-3, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, reads in part as follows: 

“(a) Except as herein otherwise provided there is hereby 

levied eyed asrcased a tax of Ten (lO$) Cents on each One Hundrea 

It j 

100.00 Dollars or fractfon~ thereof, over the first Two Hundred 

200.00 Dollars, en all notes an& obligations secured by chattel 

mmtgage, deed of drust, machanic’r lien contract, veobor’e lien, 

conditional sale* Contract an& aI2 instruments of a SFmllar nature 

vhieh are filed or recorded in the office of the County Clerk un&er 

the Registration Laws of this State; provided that tie tax 6hal.l be 

levied on instruments seourfng an amotmt~of Two Hun&red ($200.00) 

Dollara, or less. After the effective date of this Act, except as 

hereinafter provided, no such instrument shall be filed or recorded 

by any County Clurk in this State until there has been affixed to 

such instrument @tamps In accordance with the provietpns of this 

eectioq + * *” 

From a reabing of the above statute It is seen iihat the tax 18 not 

due until and unless the instrument of security Is presented for record. It 

fr further provldad that except as provided. in the Act no such instrwnent 

shall be filed for record until it has been stamped in accordance with the 

provisions of the Ilet. &J excaptlon iw’ma4e as to instrument8 dated prior 

to the effective date of i&e act. In auf conference *inion UQ. 3061, dated 

June 17, 1930, we axpMslea the view that the tax in questloa, is la+& upon 

the privilege of using the recorde of the office of the coun%y clerk, rather t 
Honorable E. L. Shelton, Page‘ $2 

than being a tax upon the n&e or other obligation secured by the mortgage 

or other lien. m 0~ opinion Ro. o-1328 we held that a deed would be 

required to be&r the stamps where the gurchaeer waatherein required to 

afmume a pre-exi.eting lndebteduese w&re the deed in which the vendor's lien 

had been originally created bad been recorded wlthout payment of the tax. 

Our opinion follmm that the inatmment with which you are concerned muat 

be stamped before it is recorded. I~I this connection it Is aammed that 

the vendor's lien has not been paid and released of record. 

Yourlr vely truly, 

ATTORNEY (I&I~ERALoFTI++X~L~ 

By /a/ I3lean R. LewI.8 

Assistaat 

Approved April 15, ,lp& 

/a/ ciEliAm c. l.fANI? 

ATPORNEY-OFT~ 

APPROVED: Opinion Committee, by B.W.B., Chairman
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00191-CR

FIDEL BRIONES

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-4108-16-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 27, 2017
STATE v. John Owen JACOBS

126PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 22, 2017

Paul F. Herzog, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Jacobs, John Owen.

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of June 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 9th day of August 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# Official Journal C 424A/8 De

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 424A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 638 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 424A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 638 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Community Plant Variety Office |
| 2020/C 424 A/01 | Call for expression of interest in the appointment as Alternate Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Community Plant Variety Office

2020/C 424 A/01

Call for expression of interest in the appointment as Alternate Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. James Issac FAULK

No. COA17-429

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

NO ERROR.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted October 1, 2008

Decided October 15, 2008

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

     RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

  JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐1291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

THOMAS KING,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:99‐cr‐00952‐1

Ruben Castillo,

     Judge.

O R D E R

The defendant‐appellant in this case was convicted of:  (1) conspiracy to distribute in

excess of 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count One); (2) distribution

of 123.5 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count Two); and (3) using a

communication facility to facilitate a drug crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (Counts

Three ‐ Six).  On appeal, this court affirmed the convictions butremanded the matterto the trial

courtforre‐sentencing post‐Booker.  (United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005.)   The defendant‐

appellant now appeals the new sentence.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08‐1291 Page 2

This court has carefully reviewed the Amended Judgement in a Criminal Case issued

by the District Court on February 4, 2008, the record on appeal, and the briefs filed by the

parties.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is summarily affirmed and we adopt as our

own the attached Amended Judgment issued by the District Court on February 4, 2008.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Wilbert THOMAS, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA17-162

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

NO ERROR.
James Allen MINYARD v. Erik A. HOOKS, Secretary of Public Safety Carlos Hernandez, Superintendent of Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution

No. 6P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James Allen Minyard, for Minyard, James Allen.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 8th of January 2018 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Burke County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of January 2018."
STATE v. Dwain Cornelius FERRELL

407P14-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Dwain Cornelius Ferrell, for Ferrell, Dwain Cornelius.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of January 2017 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
# Official Journal L 347/11 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 347 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4911 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 347

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4911 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Casalinova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Charles A. CasalinovaCharles A. CasalinovaChief Financial OfficerJuly 31, 2009







The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Glaser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 22, 2010






/s/ Robert Glaser

Robert Glaser

Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 262A/12 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5712 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5712 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 262A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/256/13 — English language (EN) conference interpreters (AD 5) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2014/C 262A/01

Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/256/13 — English language (EN) conference interpreters (AD 5)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 262A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 2 |

2014/C 262A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2009141EN.01003803.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 April 2009 — BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen v OHIM (α)

(Case T-23/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark α - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

2009/C 141/78

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Kicia, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 November 2006 (Case R 808/2006-4), concerning the registration as a Community trade mark of the figurative sign α

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 November 2006 (Case R 808/2006-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 November 2006 (Case R 808/2006-4);

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the second head of claim of BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the second head of claim of BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---