55916 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

Title: Department of Homeland 

Security—Vulnerability Identification 

Self-Assessment Tool—Transportation 

(DHS–VISAT–T). 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0037. 

Forms(s): NA. 

Affected Public: Various modal 

transportation sector owners and 

operators. 

Abstract: After its inception, TSA 

faced the challenge of securing all of the 

different modes within the 

transportation sector. A methodology 

was required in order to support interand intra-modal analysis and decisionmaking. Millions of assets exist within 

the transportation sector, ranging from 

over 500,000 highway-bridges to over 

19,000 general aviation airports. Given 

this population of assets, it became 

apparent that a mechanism was needed 

to solicit data from the asset owners/ 

operators. TSA needs this data, such as 

the assets’ security measures currently 

deployed, along with a high-level 

assessment of system security 

effectiveness, in order to prioritize 

resources. 

In response to this need, TSA’s Office 

of Threat Assessment and Risk 

Management (OTRM) developed the 

Department of Homeland Security—

Vulnerability Identification SelfAssessment Tool—Transportation 

(DHS–VISAT–T), formerly called the 

TSA Self-Assessment Risk Module 

(TSARM), as a means to gather securityrelated data and provide a cost-free 

service to the transportation sector. TSA 

designed this tool to be flexible to 

support the unique characteristics of 

each transportation mode, while still 

providing a common framework from 

which analysis and trends can be 

identified. DHS–VISAT–T represents 

the U.S. Government’s first selfassessment tool that provides the 

following features: 

• The tool is provided to users at no 

cost; 

• The tool is voluntary (potential 

users contact TSA to access the tool); 

• The tool is web-based, easily 

accessible; and 

• All ratings are determined by the 

user. 

Upon completion of the tool 

assessment, users receive a report that 

summarizes their inputs. They may then 

use this report to develop a security 

plan or to identify areas of potential 

vulnerability. Users have the option to 

submit the completed assessment to 

DHS. If submitted, DHS reviews the 

assessment for consistency and provides 

feedback to the users. 

Owners and operators within the 

transportation sector can access 

information about the tool by visiting 

TSA’s Web site: www.tsa.gov, selecting 

‘‘Industry Partners,’’ then ‘‘Risk 

Management,’’ then finally selecting the 

‘‘DHS–VISAT’’ link. Thus far, TSA has 

developed modules of the tool for 

maritime, mass transit, highway bridges, 

and rail passenger stations, with more in 

development. 

TSA is seeking OMB approval to 

renew this control number for the 

maximum three-year period to continue 

to provide this tool to transportation 

owners and operators. 

Number of Respondents: Of the 

possible 3,002,450 respondents from the 

various transportation sectors, TSA 

expects that approximately 10 percent, 

or 300,245, will use the tool. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 2,401,960 hours annually. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on 

September 19, 2005. 

Lisa S. Dean, 

Privacy Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–19089 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–4984–C–03] 

Public Housing Graduation Incentive 

Bonus Program; Correction 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Public and Indian 

Housing, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice of funding availability; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2005, HUD 

published its notice of funding 

availability (NOFA) for the Public 

Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus 

program. The NOFA includes a 

provision that disqualifies applicants 

that request funding in excess of the 

applicable maximum award. The 

Department has determined that this 

provision was erroneously included in 

this NOFA. This notice corrects this 

error by removing the provision from 

the NOFA. Except for the changes 

discussed here, and the other technical 

change published on July 29, 2005, the 

original NOFA published on June 2, 

2005, is unchanged. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions and technical assistance, 

applicants may call the Public and 

Indian Housing Information and 

Resource Center at 800–955–2232. 

Hearing- or speech-impaired persons 

may call the Federal Relay Service at 

800–877–8339. (These are toll-free 

numbers.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 

2005 (70 FR 32470), HUD published a 

NOFA for the Public Housing 

Graduation Incentive Bonus program. 

The purpose of the program is to invite 

Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) to 

apply for a graduation incentive bonus. 

The graduation incentive bonus is 

awarded to PHAs that can show their 

public housing residents are moving 

away from long-term dependence on 

housing assistance. This showing is 

evidenced by the proportion of 

households that leaves public housing 

and end their participation in assisted 

housing programs during calendar year 

2004 plus the average length of stay 

among public housing residents. 

The NOFA announced the availability 

of up to $10 million under the 

Graduation Incentive Bonus program in 

fiscal year 2005. Eligible applicants are 

PHAs that operated a public housing 

program during calendar year 2004, 

have reported Public and Indian 

Housing Information Center (PIC) 

Family Household form HUD–50058 

data for residents who ended their 

residency in public housing during 

calendar year 2004, have a minimum of 

100 dwelling units in management 

status as reported in PIC as approved by 

the field office as of January 15, 2005, 

have a minimum of twenty-five Family 

Household form HUD–50058 records 

reported in PIC and have met the 

minimum threshold criteria based upon 

its size category. 

Following publication of the June 2, 

2005, NOFA, HUD determined that 

paragraph III.C.2. (Excess Funding 

Requests) was erroneously included in 

the June 2, 2005, NOFA. That paragraph 

provides that ‘‘Applicants that request 

funding in excess of the maximum 

award that they are eligible to receive 

will not receive funding consideration.’’

This provision, adopted in error in the 

June 2, 2005, NOFA, is inappropriate as 

a basis for awarding the funds reserved 

in the NOFA. As discussed in the June 

2, 2005, NOFA, the funding is 

predetermined and will be awarded 

based on PHA size and certain 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices 55917 

identified historical data. Consequently, 

a PHA cannot receive an award in 

excess of the amount predetermined for 

its size. The formulaic nature of the 

allocation process makes it irrelevant 

that a PHA may inadvertently or 

otherwise apply for an amount larger 

than HUD decided to award. HUD will 

not exceed the respective award limits 

for the different sizes of PHAs. 

Accordingly, in the Public Housing 

Graduation Incentive Bonus Program, 

HUD will remove paragraph III.C.2. 

entitled Excess Funding Requests. 

Dated: September 15, 2005. 

Paula O. Blunt, 

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public 

and Indian Housing. 

[FR Doc. 05–18986 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[CA–668–1040–AA] 

Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 

National Monument Advisory 

Committee—Notice of Renewal 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of renewal. 

SUMMARY: This notice is published in 

accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act of 

1972 (Pub. L. 92–463). Notice is hereby 

given that the Secretary of the Interior 

and the Secretary of Agriculture have 

renewed the Bureau of Land 

Management’s Santa Rosa and San 

Jacinto Mountains National Monument 

Advisory Committee. 

The purpose of the Committee is to 

advise the Secretaries with respect to 

the preparation and implementation of 

the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto 

Mountains National Monument 

Management Plan. 

Certification Statement 

I hereby certify that the renewal of the 

Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 

National Monument Advisory 

Committee is necessary and in the 

public interest in connection with the 

Secretary of the Interior’s and the 

Secretary of Agriculture’s 

responsibilities to manage the lands, 

resources, and facilities administered by 

the Bureau of Land Management and the 

Forest Service. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maggie Langlas, National Landscape 

Conservation System (WO–170), Bureau 

of Land Management, 1849 C Street, 

NW., Room 301 LS, Washington, DC 

20240–9998, telephone (202) 452–7787. 

Gale A. Norton, 

Secretary of the Interior. 

[FR Doc. 05–19057 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. Nos. 731–TA–846–850 (Review)] 

Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, 

Line, and Pressure Pipe From the 

CZECH Republic, Japan, Mexico, 

Romania, and South Africa 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on carbon and alloy 

seamless standard, line, and pressure 

pipe from the Czech Republic, Japan, 

Mexico, Romania, and South Africa. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of full reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) 

(the Act) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on carbon and alloy seamless 

standard, line, and pressure pipe from 

the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, 

Romania, and South Africa would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 12, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On August 18, 2005, the 

Commission determined that responses 

to its notice of institution of the subject 

five-year reviews were such that full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act should proceed (70 FR 49680, 

August 24, 2005). A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements are available from the Office 

of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Participation in the reviews and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the subject 

merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in these reviews as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in section 201.11 of the 

Commission’s rules, by 45 days after 

publication of this notice. A party that 

filed a notice of appearance following 

publication of the Commission’s notice 

of institution of the reviews need not 

file an additional notice of appearance. 

The Secretary will maintain a public 

service list containing the names and 

addresses of all persons, or their 

representatives, who are parties to the 

reviews. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list.—Pursuant to 

section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s 

rules, the Secretary will make BPI 

gathered in these reviews available to 

authorized applicants under the APO 

issued in the reviews, provided that the 

application is made by 45 days after 

publication of this notice. Authorized 

applicants must represent interested 

parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), 

who are parties to the reviews. A party 

granted access to BPI following 

publication of the Commission’s notice 

of institution of the reviews need not 

reapply for such access. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Staff report.—The prehearing staff 

report in the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on February 10, 

2006, and a public version will be 

issued thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.64 of the Commission’s rules. 

Hearing.—The Commission will hold 

a hearing in connection with the 

reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on March 

2, 2006, at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Requests to 

appear at the hearing should be filed in 

writing with the Secretary to the