alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012058EN.01000701.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/7

---

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 January 2012 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-135/07) (1)

1

(Health policy - Avian influenza - Italian market in poultrymeat - Request of the Italian authorities to adopt exceptional measures to support the market - Commission decision rejecting that request)

2012/C 58/10

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Aieelo, G. Palmieri, lawyers, and by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 7 February 2007 rejecting the request of the Italian authorities to adopt exceptional measures to support the Italian market in poultrymeat within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (OJ 1975 L 282, p. 77).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission’s decision of 7 February 2007 rejecting the request of the Italian authorities to adopt exceptional measures to support the Italian market in poultrymeat within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission’s decision of 7 February 2007 rejecting the request of the Italian authorities to adopt exceptional measures to support the Italian market in poultrymeat within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
(108 So. 661)

No. 27853.

#### STATE v. ROYE.

(May 3, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.) ■*

1. Indictment and information <&wkey;40.

Under Act No. 156 of 189S, information in noncapital case may be filed in open court or clerk’s office without leave of court.

2. Criminal law <&wkey;>H60.

Motion for hew trial, based on mere unsupported allegation that verdict is contrary to law and evidence, presents nothing for review.

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union; S. D. Pearce, Judge.

• Shep Roye was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

S. L. Digby, of Earmersville, and W. L. Bagwell, of Oak Grove, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wm. J. Hammon, Dist. Atty.,- of Jonesboro (E. R. Sehowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ROGERS, J.

Defendant has appealed from his conviction and sentence on a bill of information charging him with selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. He reserved two bills of exception to the proceedings — one to the overruling of his motion to dismiss the information on the ground that it was filed without leave of court, and the other to the overruling of his motion for a new trial on the ground that his conviction was contrary to the law and the evidence.

[1, 2] There is no merit in either of defendant’s bills. An information, in a case not capital, may be filed either in open court or in the office of the clerk without leave of court having been previously obtained. Act 156 of 1898; State v. Petrich, 122 La. 127, 47 So. 438. A motion for a new trial, based upon the mere and unsupported allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, presents nothing for this court to review. This rule is too well established to require the citation of authority in its support.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40036

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS MARCELO GARCIA-MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-901-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Jesus Marcelo GarciaMartinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia-Martinez has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert G. Burton, Sr., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cenveo, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 2, 2011

/S/ ROBERTG.BURTON, SR.Robert G. Burton, Sr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of MakeMusic! Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, William R. Wolff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 22, 2005 /s/ William R. WolffWilliam R. WolffChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



        In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, GEORGE
J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in connection
with Rule , that based on my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
------------------------------------
George J. Alburger, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 10, 2004
In the MATTER OF: J.D.H., N.E.H., R.R.S., Jr.

No. COA16-1286

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Angelo WHITEHEAD

No. 465P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Ms. Sharon L. Smith, Attorney at Law, For Whitehead, Christopher Angelo.

Ms. Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, For the State.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of December 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 22nd of December 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the Petition for Discretionary Review filed by the State on the 12th of January, 2017, the Court allows the State's Petition for Discretionary Review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in State v. Brice, --- N.C. ----, --- S.E.2d ----, 2017 WL 5017127 (3 November 2017) :

"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
STATE of North Carolina, v. Dyqwhan A. BOWENS, Defendant, and Eddie L. McCoy, Bail Agent, and Financial Casualty & Surety, Surety.

No. COA16-1312

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

Schwartz & Shaw, P.L.L.C., by Kristopher L. Caudle and Rebecca M. Williams, for Wilson County Board of Education, Plaintiff-Appellant.

No brief for Dyqwhan A. Bowens, Defendant-Appellee.

No brief for Eddie L. McCoy, Bail Agent.

No brief for Financial Casualty & Surety, Defendant-Appellee Surety.

McGEE, Chief Judge.

This case is a companion case to COA16-1310, *State v. Chestnut* , filed contemporaneously with this opinion. *Chestnut* contains the facts and analysis relevant to this case. For the reasons stated in *Chestnut* , we vacate the order.

VACATED.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Judges TYSON and INMAN concur.
# Official Journal L 148/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.148.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 547 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.148.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 148

English edition

Legislation

Volume 547 June 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 548/2011 of 6 June 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 549/2011 of 6 June 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/330/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 6 June 2011 on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for notebook computers
  (notified under document C(2011) 3736)

   (1) | 5 |
| | | 2011/331/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 6 June 2011 on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for light sources
  (notified under document C(2011) 3749)

   (1) | 13 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 548/2011 of 6 June 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 549/2011 of 6 June 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year

3

DECISIONS

2011/330/EU

*

Commission Decision of 6 June 2011 on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for notebook computers
  (notified under document C(2011) 3736)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 3736)

5

2011/331/EU

*

Commission Decision of 6 June 2011 on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for light sources
  (notified under document C(2011) 3749)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 3749)

13

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
In the Matter of: D.J.W-P.

No. COA16-518

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Harry Sharod JAMES

514PA11-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2017

David W. Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender, for James, Harry Sharod.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Eric J. Zogry, Juvenile Defender, Marsha L. Levick, Attorney at Law, for Juvenile Law Center.

Mark Dorosin, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth M. Haddix, Attorney at Law, Pittsboro, Jennifer W. Marsh, Director of Research, Brent Ducharme, Attorney at Law, Allen Buansi, Attorney at Law, K. Ricky Watson, Jr., Co-Director of Youth Justice Project, Peggy Nicholson, Attorney at Law, for Senator Angela Bryant, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of November 2017 by State of NC to Amend Its Brief as Appellant by Striking a Portion of the Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2017."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4283 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to maintain or replace certain facilities and structures for 

commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2014 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to authorize 

the Secretary of the Interior to maintain or replace certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation 

services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILI4 TIES AND STRUCTURES AT SMITH GULCH. 

5 Section 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 

6 Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(24)(D)) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4283 IH

1 ‘‘Notwithstanding any provision of the Central Idaho 

2 Wilderness Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note), the Sec3 retary shall also authorize or continue to authorize main4 tenance or replacement of facilities and structures listed 

5 in this subparagraph for commercial recreation services at 

6 Smith Gulch. The Secretary shall bear the cost of any en7 vironmental, archaeological, or cultural analysis required 

8 by Federal law or regulation that must be completed prior 

9 to the Secretary’s issuance of new or continued authoriza10 tion of these facilities or structures. Regulation by the Sec11 retary of these maintenance activities or replaced facilities 

12 and structures shall not inhibit or otherwise interfere with 

13 the commercial services offered at Smith Gulch. The facili14 ties and structures referred to in this subparagraph are— 

15 ‘‘(i) motorized landscaping equipment, such as 

16 lawnmowers and weed trimmers; 

17 ‘‘(ii) chainsaws; 

18 ‘‘(iii) gasoline-powered electrical generators and 

19 associated electrical transmission facilities; 

20 ‘‘(iv) hydroelectric generators and associated 

21 electrical transmission facilities; 

22 ‘‘(v) gasoline-powered water pumps for fire sup23 pression; 

24 ‘‘(vi) transition from propane to electrical light25 ing; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4283 IH

1 ‘‘(vii) solar energy systems; and 

2 ‘‘(viii) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for power 

3 storage.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4290 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4290 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wakefield Act of 

3 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL 

5 SERVICES FOR CHILDREN PROGRAM. 

6 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 

8 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2015 through 

9 2019’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4290 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reaudren Program. thorize the Emergency Medical Services for Chil-
MCKENZIE v. DISTRICT COURT

152P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Steven M. McKenzie, for McKenzie, Steven M.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of May 2017 by Plaintiff for Interlocutory Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
STATE v. Dewayne PARKER

393P08-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 1, 2017

Dewayne Parker, for Parker.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of June 2017 by Defendant for Writ for En Banc:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of June 2017."
Ex 10.1 DIRECTV - EXHIBIT









VIA FED EX




July 28, 2014




TiVo, Inc.
2160 Gold Street
Alviso, California 95002
Attn: Naveen Chopra, CFO & Sr. Vice President, 
Corporate Development & Strategy and
Matthew Zinn, General Counsel




	
		
	Re:
	Notice to Extend Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between TiVo, Inc. and DIRECTV, LLC (formerly DIRECTV, Inc.) dated as of September 2, 2008, as amended by letter agreement dated April 20, 2009 (as amended, the "Agreement")






Gentlemen:


Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Agreement, DIRECTV hereby extends the Term of the Agreement through February 15, 2018.
Should you have any questions regarding this notice, please do not hesitate to contact me.


	
	
	Very truly yours,

	/s/ Robin N. Rogers

	Robin N. Rogers






	
		
	cc:
	Romulo Pontual

	 
	Albert Choi
STATE v. Antwarn Lee ROGERS

63A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2017

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Rogers, Antwarn Lee.

Heather H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 7th of June 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 19th day of July 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51245 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS MORENO-GALLEGOS, also known as Gerardo Gutierrez-Bustamante, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-54-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis MorenoGallegos raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3957 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the 
               ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYNTHIA JENKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cynthia 
Jenkins Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the 
               ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building''.
```
Prince Jerry JONES v. HARNETT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Jacqualyn L. Lee.

No. 404P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Prince Jerry Jones, for Jones, Prince Jerry.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 8th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Harnett County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
State of North Carolina v. Simaron Demetrius Hill

No. 165P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Simaron D. Hill, for Hill, Simaron Demetrius.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of May 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Unknown County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2016 by Defendant for Peremptory Setting:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."