alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    | /s/ Howard Thomson         
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 19, 2008            





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Lewis D. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. Brooke O. MOORE, Defendant.

No. COA 16-1160

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
(109 So. 772)

No. 27983.

#### STATE v. LANDRY.

(June 28, 1926.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 5, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Indictment and information <&wkey;l 10(31).

Indictment for sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes in language of statute *held*valid, though failing to specify kind of liquor sold.

2. Indictment and information <&wkey;!2l(2).

If indictment is lacking in particularity, remedy is by bill ■ of particulars.

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette; W. W. Bailey. Judge.

Isaac Landry was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Lessley & Rouly, of Lafayette, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James Gremillion, Dist. Atty., of Crowley (E. R. Schowalter, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

ROGERS, J.

The appellant was convicted on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. He prosecutes this appeal relying upon a single bill of exception, reserved to the action of the trial judge in overruling his motion in arrest of judgment. In this motion it is alleged the indictment is invalid because it fails to specify the kind of liquor sold.

[1,2] Appellant’s contention is untenable. The indictment charges the offense in the words of the statute. This satisfies all legal requirements. If the. indictment is lacking in particularity as ayerre.d in' appellant’s motion,his .remedy, .w.as.tp.call for a bill of par*949ticulars. State v. Coco, 152 La. 242, 92 So. 883.

The conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Javon Thomas YOUNG

No. COA17-712

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                        |  |  |  | Name: J. Roe Buckley             
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer   
|                        |  |  |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-03886, Form S-8 No. 333-37299, Form S-8 No. 333-74565, Form
S-8 No. 333-96197, Form S-8 No. 333-37658 and Form S-8 No. 333-72778) pertaining
to the Renal Care Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Renal Care
Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Renal Care Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option
Plan for Outside Directors, the Renal Care Group, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan,
the Renal Care Group, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, the
Renal Care Group, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan,
the Dialysis Centers of America, Inc. Equity Compensation Plan, the Renal Care
Group, Inc. 1999 Long -Term Incentive Plan, the Renal Disease Management by
Physicians, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997/1998 Stock Plan, and the Renal Care
Group, Inc., Amended and Restated 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan of our report
dated February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Renal Care Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Nashville, Tennessee
March 5, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2022

No. 04-22-00113-CV

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Ernest VALDEZ,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-12244

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due on March 26, 2020. On April 7, 

2022, this court notified Ms. Blanca Espericueta, the court reporter responsible for preparing the 

record, that the record was late. Ms. Espericueta was instructed to file a notification of late 

record no later than ten days from the date of our notification if the reporter’s record had not 

been filed because the fee for its preparation had not been paid. Otherwise, Ms. Espericueta was 

instructed to file the reporter’s record no later than thirty days from the date of our notification. 

On April 18, 2022, Ms. Espericueta filed a notification of late record stating that, due to her 

additional duties, she needed additional time in which to file the record. Ms. Espericueta 

estimated the record would be complete within thirty to sixty days.

Ms. Espericueta ‘s request for additional time is GRANTED IN PART. Ms. Espericueta

is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record no later than May 9, 2022.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
NO. 12-08-00381-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION, § APPEAL FROM THE 4TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

JIMMIE AND MELBA MCCORMACK,

APPELLEES § RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In its

motion, Cabot states that it has entered into an agreement with Appellees Jimmie and Melba

McCormack that settles all issues and causes of action relating to this appeal. Because Cabot has

met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and

the appeal is dismissed. 

Opinion delivered October 22, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
EMERALD PLACE DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff v. Stephen F. HORNE, III, Administrator of the Estate of Stephen F. Horne, II, Deceased; Stephen F. Horne, III; Stephen F. Horne, II PA; Horne & Horne, PLLC ; William F. Hill; and William F. Hill, PA, Defendants

No. COA16-1138

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 01, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. John Eddie MANGUM

452P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2016

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Mangum, John Eddie.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of December 2016 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of December 2016."
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00361

- CV

In re RJR Vapor Co., LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of injunction is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8( a)

.

_______________________ ___________________

Melissa Goodwin , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Filed: June 30 , 2022
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHJIT SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70005 

Agency No. A200-238-001 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

 

Sukhjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s 

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70005 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 

2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on an inconsistency between Singh’s testimony and supporting documents as 

to his brother’s name, and the lack of detail and his inability to identify the name of 

the organization to which he belonged. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility finding 

reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Singh’s explanations do not

compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 

2000). In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Singh’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 

(9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Singh failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by the 

Indian government, or with its consent or acquiescence. See Garcia-Milian v. 

Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1034-35 (9th Cir. 2014).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 CEO Certification

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rodolfo Prieto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Rodolfo Prieto     
|Rodolfo Prieto         
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: May 12, 2008
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 15, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00861-CV IN RE DAVID BARNES, Relator Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-11126 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Reichek In this original proceeding, relator Da vid Barnes challenges the trial court’s July 26, 2021 temporary order denying him possession of the subject children. On November 17, 2021, the trial court issued a ruling modifying the possession schedule set forth in the July 26, 2021 order and awarding relato r two hours of supervised possession per month. Because the trial cour t’s July 26, 2021 orde r is no longer in effect, we questioned our jurisdiction ov er this original proceeding as it now appeared relator’s request for relief is moot, and we directed relator to file either a motion to dismiss the original proceeding or a letter brief showing cause why the original proceeding should not be dism issed for want of jurisdiction.–2– After reviewing relator’s letter brief and real party in interest’s response, we conclude that this original proceeding is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. Also before the court is relator’s Oct ober 4, 2021 motion to seal court records. We grant the motion and direct the Clerk of the Court to place relator’s October 4, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus and th e accompanying manda mus record under seal.

210861F.P05 /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

October 14, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15401

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-21828-CV-JAL

MARJORIE SANTAYANA FIGUEIRA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 14, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Marjorie Figueira appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor
of Miami Dade County on her claims of age and race discrimination. After

reviewing the briefs and the record, we AFFIRM the judgment for the reasons

stated in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated October 11,

2007.

1

 In particular, we are unpersuaded that appellant was constructively discharged because 1

she was told “horrible things” would happen to her if she did not retire. This isolated remark,

even if believed by a factfinder, does not rise to the level of severe or pervasive conduct that

would support a hostile work environment claim, much less create such intolerable conditions

that a reasonable person would be compelled to resign, as required for constructive discharge. 

See, e.g., Hipp v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co., 252 F.3d 1208, 1231 (11th Cir. 2001) (citations

omitted) (constructive discharge requires a showing of greater severity or pervasiveness than

hostile work environment).

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                         |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne
|                        |  | Name:                   |  | Curtis W. Mewbourne              
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                        |  |                         |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation



19
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Alan LIVERMAN

No. COA17-394

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR.
<PAGE>   1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                               EXHIBIT 11.01

                      RED ROOF INNS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE AMOUNTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                                                      1994            1995              1996
                                                                   ----------       ---------        ---------  

Net income                                                         $ 16,860        $    18,322     $    24,064
                                                                   ========        ===========     ===========
<S>                                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Weighted  average number of historical common
   shares outstanding during the year                                18,400             18,400          27,362
  
Add - common equivalent shares (determined
   using the "treasury stock" method) representing
   shares issuable upon exercise of employee stock options              216                260             211
                                                                   --------        ------------    -----------
  
Weighted average number of shares used in
   calculation of income per share                                   18,616             18,660          27,573
                                                                   ========        ===========     ===========

Net income per share                                               $    .91        $      .98      $       .87
                                                                   ========        ===========     ===========
</TABLE>





                                      44
Exhibit 21

 

 

 

**Subsidiaries of Highwoods Properties, Inc.**

 

Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership, a North Carolina limited partnership 

 

AP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership 

 

Highwoods/Florida Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership 

 

Highwoods/Tennessee Holdings, L.P., a Tennessee limited partnership 

 

Highwoods Services, Inc., a North Carolina corporation 

 

 

| * | We have omitted the names of other direct and indirect subsidiaries of Highwoods Properties, Inc. because such other subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary. |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

**Subsidiaries of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership**

 

AP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership 

 

Highwoods/Florida Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership 

 

Highwoods/Tennessee Holdings, L.P., a Tennessee limited partnership 

 

Highwoods Services, Inc., a North Carolina corporation 

 

 

| * | We have omitted the names of other direct and indirect subsidiaries of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership because such other subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|