alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 10, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, 

INC.,

Plaintiff-Counter-DefendantAppellee and Cross-Appellant,

v.

PROFESSIONAL STAFF LEASING

CORPORATION, 

 Counter-Claimant-Defendant-

 Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

 and

BALA RAMAMOORTHY, 

 Counter-Defendant-

 Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

 

No. 05-1552

No. 06-1041

 (D.C. No. 1:00-CV-01282-JLK)

 (D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before O’BRIEN, BALDOCK, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This appeal and cross-appeal are before the court based on Appellee-Plaintiff The

Personnel Department’s motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 37(b) to reform the mandate

to include instructions allowing for post-judgment interest to Plaintiff on the forthcoming

award of prejudgment interest from the date of the original judgment entered by the
2

district court on August 25, 2005. Also before the court is a timely verified bill of costs

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 39 from Plaintiff seeking $1,284.40 for costs incurred for

producing necessary copies of the briefs and appendices. Appellants-Defendants do not

object to either the motion to reform or the verified bill of costs.

In The Personnel Department v. Professional Staff Leasing Corp., 2008 WL

4698479 (10th Cir. Oct. 27, 2008) (unpublished), this court, in relevant part, affirmed the

district court’s judgment awarding Plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages,

reversed the district court order denying Plaintiff’s request for prejudgment interest, and

remanded for an award of prejudgment interest to Plaintiff. The decision did not contain

instructions regarding an award of post-judgment interest on the prejudgment interest

award or an award for appeal-related costs.

Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s motion to reform the mandate is GRANTED. The

mandate issued November 18, 2008 is RECALLED. 

Upon further consideration, Plaintiff’s verified bill of costs is GRANTED for the

total amount of $1,284.40. To the extent reimbursement is sought by Plaintiff for costs

taxable in the district court, such as filing fees, Plaintiff may file an appropriate motion in

the district court. See Fed. R. App. P. 39(e). We conclude that Plaintiff is “the party

entitled to costs” within the meaning of that Rule. 

This court’s October 27, 2008 Order and Judgment is amended to instruct the

district court to award post-judgment interest to Plaintiff on the award of prejudgment

interest from 
3

the date of the original August 25, 2005 Judgment and to award $1,284.40 in appealrelated costs to Plaintiff.

A new mandate consistent with this order shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk
# Official Journal C 126/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 126 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6521 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 126

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6521 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 126/01 | Commission Notice on withdrawal periods in case of veterinary treatments of organic terrestrial livestock with veterinary medicinal products – RIPAC NOTE N° 2022-XX | 1 |
| 2022/C 126/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10614 – PAI PARTNERS / UVESCO) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2022/C 126/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10456 – SKY / VIACOMCBS / JV) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2022/C 126/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10153 – ORANGE / TELEKOM ROMANIA COMMUNICATIONS) (
  1
  ) | 7 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 126/01

Commission Notice on withdrawal periods in case of veterinary treatments of organic terrestrial livestock with veterinary medicinal products – RIPAC NOTE N° 2022-XX

1

2022/C 126/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10614 – PAI PARTNERS / UVESCO) (
  1
  )

1

5

2022/C 126/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10456 – SKY / VIACOMCBS / JV) (
  1
  )

1

6

2022/C 126/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10153 – ORANGE / TELEKOM ROMANIA COMMUNICATIONS) (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 126/05 | Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2022 | 8 |
| 2022/C 126/06 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2022
  (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004
  ) | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 126/05

Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2022

8

2022/C 126/06

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2022
  (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004
  )

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004

)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Robert Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town Sports International Holdings,Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting;         By: /s/ Robert Giardina       Robert Giardina      *Chief Executive Officer*         Date: May 7, 2007      
29
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Ancor Communications, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (file
nos. 333-05379, 333-27841, 333-47793, and 333-62969) on form S-3 and in the
registration statements (file nos. 333-70539, 33-82976 and 33-95138) on form S-8
of Ancor Communications, Inc., of our report dated February 5, 1999, relating to
the balance sheet of Ancor Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the
related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 1998, and related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Ancor Communications, Inc.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 19, 1999
HAIRSTON v. HARWARD

416A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2018

C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, James M. Roane, III, Attorney at Law, John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Hairston, William (Jr.).

Kent L. Hamrick, Attorney at Law, Ann C. Rowe, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, for Harward, Ashwell Bennett (Jr.).

Stephanie W. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Erie Insurance Exchange.

Ann C. Ochsner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Huntington M. Willis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Deborah J. Bowers, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

Andrew Pinto, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of February 2018 by Defendant (Harward):

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of March 2018."

Defendant (Harward) shall have up to and including the 13th day of April 2018 to file and serve his/ her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-90820,  33-90822, 333-42685 and 333-47591 of PennFed Financial Services, Inc.
on Forms S-8, and  Registration  Statement  No.  333-20499 of PennFed  Financial
Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 of our reports dated September 12, 2005, relating to
the consolidated statement of condition of PennFed Financial Services,  Inc. and
Subsidiaries  as of June 30, 2005,  and the related  consolidated  statements of
income,  comprehensive  income,  changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for the  year  then  ended,  management's  assessment  of the  effectiveness  of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as of  June  30,  2005,  and  the
effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting as of June 30, 2005,
which  reports are  included in the June 30, 2005 Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
PennFed Financial Services, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
September 13, 2005
# Official Journal L 266/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 266 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6124 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 266

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6124 October 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2018/1577 of Amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2018/1577 of Amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2018

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Budgetary remarks are only executable insofar as they do not modify or extend the scope of an existing legal base, impinge on the administrative autonomy of institutions and can be covered by available resources (as indicated in the annex to the executability letter dated 28 October 2015).

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

                      LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Liberty Property Trust (the sole general partner of the
Company), certify in connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
---------------------------
George J. Alburger, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Liberty Property Trust, the Company's sole general partner

Date:  March 11, 2005
Thomas JACKSON and Korletter Horne Jackson, Plaintiffs, v. CENTURY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

No. COA16-997

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40733 C onfer enc e C al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee v. LA R R YJ O S E P H , J R . , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 04- C R - 26- 1 B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * Larr y Jo se ph, Jr . , fede r alpr i son er # 10774- 078, w as s ent enc ed t o 1 51 m on th s i n pr i son f

oll ow i n g h i s p l ea of gu i l ty to p oss ess i on w i th the i n ten t t o d istr ib u te m o re th a n fiv e g ra m s, b u t les s th a n 5 0 g ra m s, o f co ca in e b a se (cra ck ). F ol l ow i n g am en dm en t s t o t h e Sen t en ci n g G u idel i n es th at l ow ered t h e of fen se l e ve l s f o rc r ac k c o c ai ne o f

fe ns e s , t h e di s t r i c tc o ur tg r ant e d am o t i o n b y Jo s e ph United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40733

2 pu rsuan tt o 18 U . S . C . § 3582 (c) ( 2) an d redu ced his s e n t en ce t o 130 m on t h s, w h ic h w a s a t t h e b o tt o m o f th e a m e n d e dg u id e lin e s ra n g e . Jo s e ph n o w a p p e a l s , a r gu in gt hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s fail ur e t o c o ns i de rt he 18 U . S. C . § 3553( a) fac t or s ora s ent enc e b el ow t he am ended g ui deli nes r ange w he n itre s e nt e nc e d hi m v i o l at e d Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ooker , 5 4 3 U .S . 2 2 0 (20 0 5 ), and Ki m brough v. Un i t ed S t ate s, 5 5 2 U .S . 8 5 (2 0 0 7 ). Jo s e ph’ s a r gum e nt s a r e f o r e c l o s e d in l i ght o f o ur r e c e ntde c i s i o n i n Un i t ed S t ate s v. D o u b lin , 5 7 2 F .3 d2 3 5 , 2 3 6 -3 9 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ), pet i t i on f or c ert . f

i led (S e p t. 2 1 , 2 0 0 9 ) (N o . 0 9 -6 6 5 7 ). Acc o r di ngly, t he j udg m e nto f the di s t r i c tc o ur ti s AFF I RM ED , t he G overnm e nt ’ s m o t i o n f o rs um m ary af

f i r m anc ei s G RA N TE D , a nd the G o v e r n m e n t’s m o tio n fo ra n e x te n s io n o f tim e to file ab r ie f is D E N IE D .
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Tidwell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: September 13, 2012  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
XPO LOGISTICS, INC. v. ANIS

395A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2017

Brian D. Boone, Attorney at Law, Mark T. Calloway, Attorney at Law, Michael Hoernlein, Attorney at Law, Julian W. DuRant, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Anis, Fouzi.

David C. Wright, III, Attorney at Law, Douglas M. Jarrell, Attorney at Law, Brian L. Church, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for XPO Logistics, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2017 by Defendant to Supplement the Record:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of October 2017."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, ) 

) 

Plaintiff/Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

SUPERIOR COURT DISTRICT OF ) 

COLUMm~ ) 

) 

Defendant/Appellee. ) 

Civil Case No. 10-1397 (RJL) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Michael Joseph Sindram ("Sindram"), pro se, has filed numerous appeals in this 

Court from Orders entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia in 

proceedings against Jamison Condominium Association, Chase Home Finance, LLC, 

Gustavo F. Velasquez, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, and the U.S. 

Marshal Service. On August 6, 2010, this Court issued a Memorandum Order (the 

"August 6, 2010 Memorandum Order") dismissing with prejudice Civil Case Nos. 09-

2356, 10-31, 10-134, 10-402, 10-814, 10-1084, and 10-1246. The August 6,2010 

Memorandum Order also enjoined Sindram from filing any new matters in the U.S. 

District Court for the District of Columbia without seeking leave to file from the Chief 

Judge of this Court under certain procedures outlined in the Memorandum Order and 

obtaining the Chief Judge's approval. 

On August 19,2010, Sindram filed a notice of appeal from the U.S. Bankruptcy 
Court for the District of Columbia to this Court that was docketed as the above-captioned 

case. On August 23, 2010, Sindram filed a motion seeking recusal of myself and 

immediate reinstatement of all seven civil cases that were dismissed with prejudice in the 

August 6, 2010 Memorandum Order. The motion for recusal asserts that this Court has 

"deliberately appoint[ ed] himself' to Sindram' s cases "to abrogate Debtor/ Apellant's 

constitutionally-guaranteed rights." Pl.'s Mot. 1 [#4]. Sindram has failed to marshal even 

a scintilla of factual or legal support for his motion, and it is clear that his accusations are, 

yet again, wholly without merit. Furthermore, he failed to seek and obtain leave to file 

this matter in violation of the August 6,2010 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, it is this 

?2t d~ePtember, 2010, hereby 

ORDERED that Sindram's Motion for Recusal and Immediate Reinstatement of 

Bankruptcy Matters [#4] be DENIED; and it is further 

ORDERED that Sindram be enjoined from submitting any additional filings in the 

above-captioned matter; and it is further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 

and it is further 

ORDERED that this matter be referred to the Chief Judge of the District of 

Columbia for possible contempt, per this Court's August 6,2010 Memorandum Order. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States
STATE of North Carolina v. Cedrick Shiheed SHIELDS

No. COA17-69

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NEW TRIAL.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 16, 2010






/s/ Grant King

Grant King

Chief Executive Officer