alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008253EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Mark
Gustafson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    MARK
      GUSTAFSONDate:
      September 2, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Mark
      GustafsonTitle:
            
            Chief Executive Officer




I, Shaun
Toker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    SHAUN
      TOKERDate:
      September 2, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Shaun
      TokerTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.0  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  Parent  TF Financial Corporation  Subsidiaries
  
  Percentage
  Owned
  
  Jurisdiction of
  IncorporationThird Federal Bank(a)
  
  100
  %
  United
  StatesTF Investments Corporation(a)
  
  100
  %
  DelawareTeragon Financial Corporation(a)(b)
  
  100
  %
  PennsylvaniaPenns Trail Development Corporation(a)
  
  100
  %
  DelawareThird Delaware Corporation(a)(b)
  
  100
  %
  Delaware  
 (a)The
operations of this subsidiary are included in the consolidated financial
statements contained in the 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders incorporated
herein by reference.  (b)Third
Delaware Corporation and Teragon Financial Corporation are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Third Federal Bank.
----

EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Sass Peress, Chief Executive Officer of ICP SolarTechnologies Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that: 

1. 

I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ICP Solar Technologies Inc.; 

2. 

Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. 

Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) 

designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; 

b) 

evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c) 

disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. 

Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 

allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofour financial reporting internal controls which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b) 

any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: December 21, 2009 

/s/ *Sass Peress*---------------------------------- Sass Peress Chief Executive Officer 

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31293

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KERRY JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CR-58-T)

______________________________________________

August 29, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Kerry Jackson, Gary V. Schwabe,

Jr., has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). We have independently reviewed the brief and

record and have found no non-frivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel
2

is excused from further responsibilities herein and Jackson’s

APPEAL is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
namg_ex109.htm


EXHIBIT 10.9


 







  





1











  






 







  





2











  






 







  





3











  






 







  





4











  






 







  





5











  






 








  





6











  






 







  





7











  






 







  





8











  






 







  





9











  






 







  





10











  








 








  





11











  






 







  





12











  






 







  





13











  






 







  





14











  






 





 


 


 

15
Natalie S. OWEN, Plaintiff, v. Louis James DAVIS, II, Defendant.

No. COA17-143

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REVERSED.
----

Action brought on 14 April 2005 by Nederlandse Vakbond Varkenshouders and Others v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-151/05)

(2005/C 171/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought on 14 April 2005 by the Nederlandse Vakbond Varkenshouders (Netherlands Association of pig breeders), established in Lunteren (Netherlands); Marius Schep, residing in Lopik (Netherlands) and the Nederlandse Bond van Handelaren in Vee (Netherlands association of livestock dealers), established in the Hague (Netherlands), represented by Johannes Kneppelhout and Monique Charlotte van der Kaden.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek annulment of the Commission Decision of 21 December 2004 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3605 — SOVION/HMG).

The applicants submit that the Commission has infringed Articles 2, 6 and 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1) (the EC Merger Regulation). In the applicants' view, the Commission unlawfully decided that the proposed concentration gave rise to no problems for competition on the market for the purchase of live pigs and sows for slaughter and that no dominant position arose on the relevant market. In that connection the applicants claim that in certain recitals to the contested decision the Commission applied a distorted definition of the relevant product market by including the market for sows in the market for pigs. In the applicants' view the Commission defined the geographical market incorrectly.

The applicants also claim an infringement of the duty to provide a statement of reasons and of due care. According to the applicants the Commission gave the applicants insufficient opportunity to clarify their views and disregarded the information supplied by them.

----

(1)  OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                       939
<INVENTORY>                                        228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,406
<PP&E>                                          17,561<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,100)<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,070
<SALES>                                            791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,368
<CGS>                                              947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,879)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)
<FN>
<F1>Fixed assets are reported net of accummulated depreciation in the balance
sheet.
</FN>


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136409 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136409 

 COA: 283882 

Wayne CC: 06-011234

JERRY HAMPTON COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE v. Juan Manuel VILLA

328P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2017

Anita LeVeaux, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandeBerg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Villa, Juan Manuel.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of October 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of October 2017."
In the MATTER OF: A.C.-H.

No. COA17-466

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

REVERSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. John Shadrick MATTHEWS, III, Defendant.

No. COA 17-349

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

NO ERROR.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael Bolden, Appellant

No. 06-18-00193-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR18-181). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Michael Bolden, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 24, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Chamel THOMAS

No. COA17-313

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO ERROR IN PART. REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING IN PART.
# Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, Constitution Week, 2005

More than two centuries after our Founding Fathers gathered in 1787 in Philadelphia, our Nation continues to be guided by the Constitution they drafted.

The Constitution of the United States reflects our ideals and establishes a practical system of government. It provides for three separate branches—the legislative, the executive, and the judicial—with defined responsibilities and with checks and balances among the branches. Under our Constitution, both the Federal Government and the State governments advance the will of the people through the people's representatives. To protect the rights of our citizens and maintain the rule of law, Article III of the Constitution provides for a judiciary of independent judges who have life tenure.

These fundamental principles—separation of powers, federalism, and an independent judiciary—have endured, and they have been essential to our Nation's progress toward equal justice and liberty for all. On Constitution Day and Citizenship Day and during Constitution Week, we celebrate the genius of our Constitution and reaffirm our commitment to its stated purposes: “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

In remembrance of the signing of the Constitution and in recognition of the Americans who strive to uphold the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, the Congress, by joint resolution of February 29, 1952 (36 U.S.C. 106, as amended), designated September 17 as “Constitution Day and Citizenship Day,” and by joint resolution of August 2, 1956 (36 U.S.C. 108, as amended), requested that the President proclaim the week beginning September 17 and ending September 23 of each year as “Constitution Week.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim September 17, 2005, as Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, and September 17 through September 23, 2005, as Constitution Week. I encourage Federal, State, and local officials, as well as leaders of civic, social, and educational organizations, to conduct ceremonies and programs that celebrate our Constitution and reaffirm our rights and obligations as citizens of our great Nation.                          ( print page 55508)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-18976

Billing code 3195-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles A. Casalinova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            /s/ CHARLES A. CASALINOVA
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Charles A. Casalinova
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            November 10, 2004
Kevin POSEY v. WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. and Wayne Health Corporation

No. 224A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Kevin Posey, for Posey, Kevin.

Patrick M. Meacham, Kayla Marshall, Raleigh, Valyce M. Davis, Attorneys at Law, for Wayne Memorial Hospital, Inc., et al.

*625***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 7th of July 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
STATE v. Derrick D. BOGER

158P06-15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Derrick D. Boger, for Boger, Derrick D.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of September 2017 by Defendant to Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
In the MATTER OF: R.S., A.G.-C.M.

No. COA17-204

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART. DIMISSED IN PART.
# C_2008223EN.01003902.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Josef Holzinger v Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur

(Case C-332/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/66)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
Jamestown Pender, L.P., Plaintiff v. North Carolina Department of Transportation and Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, Defendants

No. COA15-925

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4290 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4290

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wakefield Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``each 
of fiscal years 2015 through 2019''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4290

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children Program.
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Fronta Lamont GILCHRIST

No. 275P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Fronta Lamont Gilchrist, for Gilchrist, Fronta Lamont

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of August 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of August 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."