alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Peter
Hill, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July
31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    PETER
      HILLDate:
      September14,
      2010
            
            Name:
            
            Peter
      HillTitle:
            
            Chief Executive Officer




I, Jon
Samuels, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July
31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    JON
      SAMUELSDate:
      September14,
      2010
            
            Name:
            
            Jon
      SamuelsTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") of BV Pharmaceutical, Inc., as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Art Bandenieks, Chief Executive Officer of BV Pharmaceutical,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 11, 2005                       /s/ ART BANDENIEKS
                                             ____________________________
                                                 Art Bandenieks
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 413/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 413 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 638 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 413

English edition

Legislation

Volume 638 December 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/2000 of 27 November 2020 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles and its implementing protocol (2020-2026) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/2001 of 4 December 2020 appointing two members, proposed by the Portuguese Republic, of the Committee of the Regions | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/2000 of 27 November 2020 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles and its implementing protocol (2020-2026)

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/2001 of 4 December 2020 appointing two members, proposed by the Portuguese Republic, of the Committee of the Regions

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 119/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 119 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 516 May 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 119

English edition

Legislation

Volume 516 May 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60105

Conference Calendar

JOHN ROBERT LEIDECKER

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

CONSTANCE REESE, Warden

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:07-CV-192

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Robert Leidecker, federal prisoner # 66326-004, appeals the

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841. In his petition,

Leidecker asserted that the term of supervised release he received, imposed in

addition to his term of imprisonment, is unlawful and violates the Double

Jeopardy Clause. He further asserted that the 60-month term of supervised

release must run concurrently with his 120-month term of imprisonment, so that

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60105

2

his total imprisonment could not exceed 120 months. He requested that the

Bureau of Prisons (BOP) be ordered to recalculate his prison term based on his

claims and that the term of supervised release be invalidated. 

The district court determined that the claims should have been brought

in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the Southern District of Florida, which imposed

the sentence, and it thus dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We

review the dismissal de novo. Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000).

Leidecker contends that his claims were properly brought under § 2241 as

he challenges the manner in which his sentence is being executed by the BOP,

as evidenced by the fact that he seeks relief in the form of an order directing the

BOP to recalculate his sentence. However, because his claims rely on the

underlying assertion that a term of supervised release was unauthorized, the

district court did not err in determining thatLeidecker’s challenge to the validity

of his sentence presented a claim arising under § 2255. See Kinder v. Purdy, 222

F.3d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 2000). Leidecker makes no argument that he qualifies

for relief under § 2255's savings clause. The district court’s dismissal is

therefore AFFIRMED.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. BRA D LEY A G G A RN ER, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30064 D C C R N o. 3: 09 -508 8 B H S -2 ME MOR AN DU M *

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. BRA D LEY A G G A RN ER, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30165 D C C R N o. 3: 09 -050 88 B H S -2

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. N o. 10- 30211 D C C R N o. 3: 09 -050 88 B H S -2



# FI LED APR15 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2)(C ). 2 BRA D LEY A G G A RN ER, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. A pp ea l s f

rom the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on B e nj a m i n H . S e tt l e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 12, 2011 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: K L E IN F E L D , T A S H IM A , an d S IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B ra dl eyG arner app ea l s the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entof conv i ct i on and o rder of r e s t i tut i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e m a nd f or a m e n d m e n t o f

th e ju d g m e n t a n d p r e s e n te n c e in v e s tig a tio n r e p o rt ( P S R ) . W e affi rm i n al l o th er resp ect s. T he c onvi c t i on on C ount1 r e m a i ns va l i d be c aus e i ti s s upport e d bythe in d e p e n d e n tlyv a lid“m o n e yo rp r o p e rty ” th e o ry . U ni ted Stat es v. P el isam en , N o. 10- 10022, s l i p op. 5011, 5022 ( 9th C i r . A pr . 13, 2011) . B e c aus e the gove rnm e ntdoe s notoppos e G a rne r ’ s r e que s tf oral i m i t e d r e m a nd i ns truc t i ng the di s tr i c tc ourtt o de l e t e a l l r e f e r e nc e s t o the f

tof hone s ts e rvi c e s i n the j udgm e nta nd P S R , w e grantsuch re l i ef .3

T he r e s t i tut i on or de ri s pr ope r . B e c aus e G a rne rw a s c onvi c t e d of w i r e f r aud and m ai l fr aud, bo th o f w hi ch have a “ sc hem e” el em ent , the re st i tut i on order c o rr e c tlye n c o m p a s s e s r e la te d b u t u n c h a r g e d c o n d u c t. See U nt i ed Stat es v. B rockD a v is , 5 0 4 F .3 d 9 9 1 , 9 9 8 - 9 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; U ni ted Stat es v. G ri ce , 319 F . 3d 11 74 , 11 77 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). W e RE MAND w i th i ns truc t i ons tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourta m e nd the j udgm e nt a n d P S R b yd e le tin g a ll r e f e r e n c e s to th e f

t o f h o n e s t s e rv ic e s , 1 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 4 6 . W e AF F I RM in a ll o th e rr e s p e c ts .
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4460 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal the sunset of 

the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. HONDA (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. PETERS of California, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. MENG, and Mr. 

MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal 

the sunset of the special immigrant nonminister religious 

worker program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELI4 GIOUS WORKER PROGRAM. 

5 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and 

6 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended 

7 in subclauses (II) and (III) by striking ‘‘before September 

8 30, 2015,’’ both places such term appears. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael FARROW, Defendant.

No. COA17-517

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

REVERSE.
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-38878, 333-12117, 333-29759 and 333-55901 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), dated March 2, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in its method of accounting for share-based payments, effective January 1, 2006, to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment,* and the Company’s change in its method of accounting for joint ventures, effective January 1, 2006, to conform to Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-5, *Determining Whether a GeneralPartner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights*) and our report relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highwoods Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte and Touche, LLP

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 2, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. Mark BURWELL

No. 10P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Burwell, Mark.

Ashish K. Sharda, Assistant Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th of January 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of January 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*874"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
**EXHIBITA**

**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), **I**, **Peter J. Hardie, Chief FinancialOfficer** of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: **January 10, 2013**

| By: | */s/ Peter J.Hardie* |
|-----|----------------------|

|   | ****Peter J. Hardie****ChiefFinancial Officer** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the
Company) for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Fiorenza, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ D. A. Fiorenza          
|    |  | David A. Fiorenza           
|    |  | Vice President and Treasurer
|    |  | July 29, 2009
Karen HEAD v. GOULD KILLIAN CPA GROUP, P.A., G. Edward Towson, II, CPA

No. 27A17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

J. Daniel Bishop, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Head, Karen L.

Brenda S. McClearn, Attorney at Law, Peter F. O'Connell, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Gould Killian CPA Group, P.A., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of January 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

*791Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dezonte Sheron WHITE

No. COA17-214

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 6, 2018

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5513-5514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, 
and Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 1, 2005 from 11 a.m. to 
12 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, March 1, 2005, from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. ET via a telephone 
conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie 
Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, 
FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to 
participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with 
Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-
7979, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include: Various IRS issues.


[[Page 5514]]


    Dated: January 28, 2005.
Martha Curry,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 05-1949 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
(108 So. 111)

No. 27308.

#### STATE v. FUTRELL.

(March 29, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Criminal law &wkey;>268 — Minutes of record as corrected, affirmatively showing accused was not present when his counsel waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty in his behalf, held ground for setting aside verdict and sentence and remanding case.

Minutes of record as corrected, affirmatively showing accused was not present when his counsel waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty in his behalf, *held,*ground for setting aside verdict and sentence and remanding case.

Appeal from Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Grant; R. C. Culpepper, Judge.

On .return of transcript after correction of minutes of lower court contradictorily with the State and the accused, the case having been remanded for such correction. 106 So. 651, 159 La. 1093.

Verdict and sentehcé set aside, and ease remanded.

John A. & R. P. Williams, of Lake Charles, and Clair H. McCain, of Colfax, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Cleveland Dear, Dist. Atty., of Alexandria, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This case was remanded ex proprio motu “to afford the state an opportunity to correct the minutes contradictorily with the accused so as to show whether the accused was present when his counsel waived arraignment and to show further whether he was present on each day of the trial of the case, including the rendition of the verdict and passing of sentence.” See 159 La. 1093, 106 So. 651.

The minutes, when' thus corrected, show that the accused was present in person at all times when the ease was on trial, from the calling thereof and the impaneling of the jury up' to and including the' rendition of the verdict, and also when sentence was passed upon him ; but they also show affirmatively that he was not present when his counsel waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty in his behalf. ' '

The verdict and sentence herein are therefore set aside, and the case is now remanded for due arraignment of the accused and for further proceedings according to law.