alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Roy A. COOPER, III, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Philip E. BERGER, in His Official Capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; and Timothy K. Moore, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives

No. 52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 21, 2017

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III)

Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Kevin Crandall, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, et al.

Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, Anita S. Earls, Attorney at Law, Emily E. Seawell, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members.

**61**ORDER**

The Court, on its own motion, orders the State to make a filing no later than 2:00 p.m. on Monday, 21 August 2017 containing the following information:

> 1) the identity of each county board of elections which currently lacks a quorum;

> 2) the extent, if any, to which any affected county board of elections would be unable to act even if the consent order which has been proposed by the parties is entered;

> 3) the nature and extent of any pending, unresolved complaints which affect the manner in which any election to be held on or before 12 September 2017 in any of those counties is to be conducted;

> 4) the date or dates upon which the ballots associated with any election affected by those complaints have to be made available for absentee or early voting purposes;

> 5) the date or dates upon which absentee or early voting must begin in any election affected by those complaints;

> 6) and any other relevant information that the State believes would be helpful to the Court.

The other parties are ordered to advise the Court of the extent, if any, to which they wish to supplement or comment upon any of the information provided by the State in response to this order no later than 5:00 p.m.

*736on Monday, 21 August 2017 and the date and time at which **62any such supplemental information or comments can be filed with the Court. In the event that the parties cannot, with reasonable effort, make the filings required by this order, they should notify the Court of the time and date upon which they reasonably believe that the required filing can be made.
# C_2013336EN.01001302.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Nynäs Petroleum and Nynas Petróleo v Commission

(Case T-482/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for penetration bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Annual market-sharing and price-fixing arrangements - Evidence of participation in the cartel - Calculation of the amount of the fine)

2013/C 336/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Nynäs Petroleum AB (Stockholm, Sweden); and Nynas Petróleo, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: D. Beard QC, and M. Dean, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by X. Lewis and F. Castillo de la Torre, subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre and J. Bourke, and lastly by F. Castillo de la Torre and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2007) 4441 final of 3 October 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/38.710 — Bitumen (Spain)) or, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Nynas Petróleo, SA in Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2007) 4441 final of 3 October 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/38.710 — Bitumen (Spain)) at EUR 10 406 000, and the amount of the fine imposed on Nynäs Petroleum, AB in Article 2 of that decision at EUR 10 164 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Nynas Petróleo, SA in Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2007) 4441 final of 3 October 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/38.710 — Bitumen (Spain)) at EUR 10 406 000, and the amount of the fine imposed on Nynäs Petroleum, AB in Article 2 of that decision at EUR 10 164 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the remaining heads of claim in the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remaining heads of claim in the application;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

1

---
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE

OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc. Docket AG V.
• No. 51 ERIC JOHN PARHAM
• September Term, 2016

Respondent ***********************************************
ORDER This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of an Order issued October 18, 2005 by the North Carolina State Bar (Attachment A), wherein the North Carolina State Bar ordered the immediate disbarment of Eric John Parham; and it appearing that said Eric John Parham is admitted to the Bar of this Court; NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of October ,20l6, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 1 9 - 737(d), that Eric John Parham, Respondent, is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eric John Parham. from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall issue notice of the suspension in accordance with Rule 19-761(b).



### /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Filed 1/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 3

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Weston Kelvin Wells, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170173

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jason J. Hammes, Assistant City Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Chad R. McCabe, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

City of Bismarck v. Wells

No. 20170173

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Weston Wells appealed from a criminal judgment for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor entered upon a conditional guilty plea after the district court denied his motion to suppress.  On appeal, Wells argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress chemical test results because he was denied his statutory right to the reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing.  We conclude the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).  City of Dickinson v. Schank, 2017 ND 81, ¶ 12, 892 N.W.2d 593.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Mahlab, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.




March 30, 2011
/s/ David Mahlab

David Mahlab

Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7450

BOBBY BURGHART , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SARA BEYER , Defendant

- Appellee , and THOMAS KANE; J. F. CARAWAY; J. ANDREWS; ERIC W. GIBSON; T. PALUCH; B. NEAGLE; KIRKPATRICK; BRADFORD, Unicore Plant Manager; BELLAS, Unit Supervisor; R. SIMMONS; S. COX; L. LINDSAY; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT DERRY; WILLIAM O ’ DONNELL; STEPHANIE MARTIN , Defendants

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:17

- ct

- 03048

- BO )

Submitted : March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Bobby Burghart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Bobby Burghart appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671

- 2680 (2018) , under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018) , and granting summary judgment on some of his claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , for failure to exhaust or on the merits, and a subsequent order granting summary judgment to Defendants on the remaining deliberate indifference claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

st ated by the district court. Burghart v. Beyer , No. 5:17

- ct

- 03048

- BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2018; Sept. 17, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
In the MATTER OF: N.A.P.

No. COA17-160

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Elias Antwan COLLINS

No. 204P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, for Collins, Elias Antwan.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of June 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2017 by Defendant to Deem Petition Timely Filed:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1806/2005

of 3 November 2005         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 35.

(4)OJ L 280, 24.10.2005, p. 12.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 4 November 2005

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Mark
        Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        to my
        knowledge that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle
        Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or
        its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/
        MARK GUSTAFSON
 Mark
        Gustafson
 President
        (Principal Executive Officer)
 September
        20, 2005
# Official Journal C 359/30 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 359 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5830 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 359

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5830 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 359/1 | Financial activity report 2014 — Section II — European Council and Council | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2015/C 359/1

Financial activity report 2014 — Section II — European Council and Council

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT of CALHOUN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 2nd day of July,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Refugio Independent School District, Appellant,

v.

Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc.,

Professional Services Industries, Inc.,

and D. S. A., Inc. Appellees.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00016-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 14-09-2274)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 13th day of August, 2015.

Cecile Foy Gsanger, CLERK
XPO LOGISTICS, INC. v. ANIS

395A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 2017

Brian D. Boone, Attorney at Law, Mark T. Calloway, Attorney at Law, Michael Hoernlein, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Julian W. DuRant, Attorney at Law, for Anis, Fouzi.

David C. Wright, III, Attorney at Law, Douglas M. Jarrell, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for XPO Logistics, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 31st of January 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of February 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 17th day of March 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
No. 17,548.

#### Lora E. Cargill *v.*Martha Brady, a minor, and John Brady.

(283 P. [2d] 651)

Decided May 16, 1955.

Rehearing denied May 31, 1955.

Messrs. Wolvington & Wormwood, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Murray, Baker & Wendelken, Mr. H. T. McGarry, for defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

Judgment for plaintiffs affirmed without written opinion.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter P.W. Notter, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Clyvia Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/
      Walter P.W. Notter     
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| | Name:  | WALTER P.W. NOTTER               
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| | Date:  | June 19, 2007                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

41P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Arthur O. Armstrong, Los Angeles, CA, for Armstrong, Arthur O.

The following order has been entered on the motions filed by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Writ of Mandamus:

"All Motions Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."