alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE: M.A.W.

279PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2017

Rebekah W. Davis, Attorney at Law, for Allen, Anthony Brock.

Regina Floyd-Davis, Attorney at Law, for New Hanover County DSS.

William L. Esser, IV, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for GAL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of August 2017 by Guardian Ad Litem to Amend Guardian Ad Litem New Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2017."
FTNT-EX10.2_2014.06.30-Q Michael Xie






Exhibit 10.2
FORTINET, INC.
AMENDMENT 1
TO
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


This Amendment 1 to the Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) that was made and entered into by and between Michael Xie (“Executive”) and Fortinet, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of August 7, 2009, is made and entered into by and between the Executive and Fortinet as of the date stated in the paragraph that immediately follows.
For all of the reasons stated in the Recitals of the Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, Executive and the Company hereby agree that the Effective Date of the Agreement is amended to be August 7, 2014 and such date shall be the defined term “Effective Date” throughout the Agreement.
Except for the amendment stated immediately above, the Agreement and its terms remain in place as-is.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment 1 to Change of Control Severance Agreement effective as of July 31, 2014.


	
			
	COMPANY
	FORTINET, INC
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ John Whittle

	 
	Title:
	Vice President, General Counsel




    




	
			
	EXECUTIVE
	By:
	/s/ Michael Xie

	 
	Title:
	President and Chief Technology Officer
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4360 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Forest Service 

for the Grandfather Ranger District located at 109 

Lawing Drive in Nebo, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Jason 

Crisp Forest Service Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4360 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JASON CRISP FOREST SERV2 ICE BUILDING, NEBO, NORTH CAROLINA. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the Grandfather 

4 Ranger District of the United States Forest Service lo5 cated at 109 Lawing Drive in Nebo, North Carolina, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Jason Crisp Forest Serv7 ice Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jason Crisp Forest 

12 Service Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4360 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States ForBuilding’’. Carolina, as the ‘‘Jason Crisp Forest Service located at 109 Lawing Drive in Nebo, North est Service for the Grandfather Ranger District
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40109

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGEL REYES-FIGUEROA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-1014-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel Reyes-Figueroa

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reyes-Figueroa has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie Anthony Junio FARRAR

No. COA17-215

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 21, 2017

NO PLAIN ERROR.
EXHIBIT 12.2



CERTIFICATION OF GREGORY SMITH

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)













---



Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Gregory Smith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CDG Investments Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 24, 2005



Gregory Smith

__________________________

Gregory Smith, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008183EN.01003102.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/31

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 May 2008 — Cova v Commission

(Case F-101/07) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Article 7(2) of the Staff Regulations - Interim allowance - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 183/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Cova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, Advocate)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision to limit to one year the period during which the applicant, an official called upon to occupy, on a temporary basis, a post of head of unit, may benefit from the differential allowance provided for by Article 7(2) of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007, p. 73.

1

---
# Official Journal C 345/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.345.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5318 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.345.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 345

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5318 December 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 345/01 | Council conclusions of 6 December 2010 on strengthening the commitment and stepping up action to close the gender pay gap, and on the review of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 345/02 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2010/C 345/01

Council conclusions of 6 December 2010 on strengthening the commitment and stepping up action to close the gender pay gap, and on the review of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action

1

European Commission

2010/C 345/02

Euro exchange rates

11

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 345/03 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 12 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 345/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6084 — Wittington/Divisie Bijenkorf) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 13 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 345/03

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

12

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 345/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6084 — Wittington/Divisie Bijenkorf) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In the MATTER OF: K.R. & K.R.

No. COA16-583

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4317 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4317

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 
States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use of 
   information provided by State, tribal, and county governments in 
         decisionmaking under such Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2014

 Mr. Neugebauer (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mrs. Lummis, 
Mr. Amodei, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Harris, Mr. 
 Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Southerland, 
Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Valadao) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 
States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use of 
   information provided by State, tribal, and county governments in 
         decisionmaking under such Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State, Tribal, and Local Species 
Transparency and Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING DECISIONAL TRANSPARENCY WITH AFFECTED STATES.

    Section 6(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1535(a)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by striking ``Such cooperation shall include'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(2) Such cooperation shall include--
            ``(A) before making a determination under section 4(a), 
        providing to States affected by such determination all data 
        that is the basis of the determination; and
            ``(B)''.

SEC. 3. ENSURING USE OF STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
(16 U.S.C. 1532) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (21) as 
        paragraphs (3) through (22), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
    ``(2) The term `best scientific and commercial data available' 
includes all such data submitted by a State, tribal, or county 
government.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7(n) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 
1536(n)) is amended by striking ``section 3(13)'' and inserting 
``section 3(14)''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Derek Antonio SMITH, Jr.

No. COA17-153

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 2, 2018

NO PLAIN ERROR.
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David C. Mahoney, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Dated: November 15, 2004 /s/  David C. Mahoney   David C. Mahoney   Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Amanda Gayle REED

331A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 18, 2016

Matthew C. Coxe, Attorney at Law, for Reed, Amanda Gayle.

Melody R. Hairston, Assistant Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 17th of October 2016 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of October 2016."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE v. Robert Walter HUFFMAN

328P06-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 2018

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Robert Walter Huffman, for Huffman, Robert Walter.

*877The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of November 2017 by Defendant to Reconsider:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."
# Official Journal C 169/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 645 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 645 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 169/01 | Position (EU) No 14/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013Adopted by the Council on 13 April 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 169/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 | 26 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 169/01

Position (EU) No 14/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013Adopted by the Council on 13 April 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 169/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013

26

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Eternal Energy Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A
      for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Kirk Stingley, Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


August
      11, 2008




*/s/
                Kirk Stingley*Kirk
                Stingley,Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-07737 and 333-24355) and on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-11141) of Aquis Communications Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 28, 2000, except for Note 22 for which the date is April 12,
2000 and our report dated February 12, 1999 on Bell Atlantic Paging, Inc.
relating to the financial statements which appear in this Form 10K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
April 14, 2000
State of North Carolina v. Brent Tyler Miller

No. 199PA15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016

Noell P. Tin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Miller, Brent Tyler.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Caolina.

*ORDER*

This case has come before this Court on discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, --- N.C. App. ----, 773 S.E.2d 574 (2015), dismissing the State's appeal from an oral order rendered on 2 June 2014 by Judge Linwood O. Foust in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, based on the Court of Appeals' determination that the record did not contain any indication that the order from which the State sought to appeal had been entered in accordance with the process set out in *State v. Oates* , 366 N.C. 264, 732 S.E.2d 571 (2012). While this case was pending before us, it came to the attention of this Court that the official minutes relating to the 2 June 2014 criminal session of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, reflected that, after Judge Foust orally announced his decision to affirm Judge Best-Staton's 16 January 2014 order, the courtroom clerk made a notation of Judge Foust's ruling in the minutes, establishing that Judge Foust's order had, in fact, been properly entered. The minute entry reflecting the entry of Judge Foust's order were not included in the record on appeal submitted for the consideration of the Appellate Division of the General Court of Justice.

Now, therefore, this Court, on its own motion, pursuant to N.C. R. P. 15(f), ORDERS that the record on appeal in this matter be AMENDED to include a certified copy of the minutes relating to the 2 June 2014 session of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, that reflect the courtroom clerk's notations regarding Judge Foust's ruling and the State's intent to appeal to the Court of Appeals therefrom, a copy attached to this order.

By order of the Court in Conference, this *17th* day of *March,* 2016.
In the Matter of: J.T.O. and J.Q.O.

No. COA16-383

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

VACATED AND REMANDED.