alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Corey J. Coughlin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First State Financial Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to de designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including our consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared:  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.        Date:  August 4, 2005 By*:  /s/ Corey J. Coughlin*   Corey J. Coughlin   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Timothy WILKINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Timothy Wilkinson, Bonifay, Pro Se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Floyd v. State,*807 So.2d 93 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

PETERSON, PLEUS and MONACO, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Jermaine Antwan TART

427P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2017

*580Sarah Holladay, Attorney at Law, for Tart, Jermaine Antwan.

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of December 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2017."
Order entered September 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01430
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 01603
- CR
NAKIA LASHUAN FRANKL IN, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Coll in County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 416
- 81048
- 20 08 , 416
- 81072
- 2012 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES these appeals. On August 14, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the availability of the reporter’s record from the June 19, 2008 gu ilty plea hearing. On September 4, 2013, we received the record of the plea hearing. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 14, 2013 order requiring findings.
We ORDER appellant to file a brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 7/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 7 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6010 January 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 7

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6010 January 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 7/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 7/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 7/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8328 — The Cerberus Group/Staples Europe) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2017/C 7/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8339 — Macquarie/Prédica/Pisto) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 7/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8328 — The Cerberus Group/Staples Europe) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2017/C 7/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8339 — Macquarie/Prédica/Pisto) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4405 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4405

 To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
    possession of a firearm by a person who is adjudicated to have 
                   committed a violent juvenile act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2014

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
    possession of a firearm by a person who is adjudicated to have 
                   committed a violent juvenile act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Gun Violence Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY A PERSON WHO IS 
              ADJUDICATED TO HAVE COMMITTED A VIOLENT JUVENILE ACT.

    (a) Possession Ban.--Section 922(g) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (8);
            (2) by striking the comma at the end of paragraph (9) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
            ``(10) who has been adjudicated by a court of the United 
        States to have committed a violent juvenile act,''.
    (b) Violent Juvenile Act Defined.--Section 921(a) of such title is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(36) The term `violent juvenile act' means--
            ``(A) an act by a person before the person attains 18 years 
        of age that, if committed by an adult, would be punishable by a 
        term of imprisonment exceeding one year, and--
                    ``(i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or 
                threatened use of physical force against another 
                person; or
                    ``(ii) by its nature, involves a substantial risk 
                that physical force against another person may be used 
                in the course of committing the act; and
            ``(B) an act described in subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) by a person who has attained 18 years of age 
                but not 21 years of age; and
                    ``(ii) for which the person is tried as a juvenile 
                or youthful offender under State law.''.
                                 <all>
```
Vivian PAIR, Plaintiff, v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center-University, Defendant.

No. COA17-586

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 19, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Julius MERCER, Defendant, and Herbert Woodard, Surety.

No. COA16-1314

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

VACATED.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewMarket Corporation (the
Company) for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Gottwald               
|    |  | Thomas E. Gottwald                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | April 29, 2008                       



42
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 05-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                   |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                        |  | Name:                             |  | J. Roe Buckley         
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | Title:                            |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
**EXHIBIT 12.1****Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                                               **Three Months Ended**   **Year Ended December 31,** **March 31,**   **2002**  **2003**  **2004**  **2005**  **2006**  **2007**   **(Dollars in Thousands)**    Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations $1,992  $2,661  $(4,364) $3,468  $3,020  $1,322 Plus: Income Taxes  1,727   1,753   (2,476)  2,248   2,313   962 Fixed Charges  7,321   5,494   4,761   10,841   17,340   4,419                     Earnings Available for Fixed Charges  11,040   9,908   (2,079)  16,557   22,673   6,703                          Fixed Charges:                        Interest Expense  6,996   5,225   4,454   10,438   16,934   4,320 Estimate Portion of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest  325   269   307   403   406   99                    Total Fixed Charges  7,321   5,494   4,761   10,841   17,340   4,419                                              **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  **1.5**   **1.8**   **-0.4**   **1.5**   **1.3**   **1.5**                                             **Calculation of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest**                        Rental Expense  974   806   921   1,209   1,217   298 Estimated % Equivalent to Interest  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%  33.3%                   Estimate Portion of Rental Expense Equivalent to Interest  325   269   307   403   406   99
# C_2008301EN.01003901.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2008 — Cemex Polska v Commission

(Case T-203/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - National allocation plan in respect of emission allowances for Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 - Decision by the Commission not to raise objections subject to certain conditions - Competence of Member States in the individual allocation of emission allowances - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 301/66)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: F. Puel and M. Szpunar, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U.Wölker and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by the Republic of Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 19-BG-449

IN RE STEWART L. GITLER

2019 DDN 126

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 387303

BEFORE: Glickman and Beckwith, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior 

Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED— June 13, 2019)

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent’s right to 

practice law in the state of Virginia for a period of 90 days by consent; this court’s

May 31, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and 

directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed;

respondent’s statement that he does not oppose the imposition of reciprocal 

discipline, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that 

respondent has failed to file his required D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Stewart L. Gitler is hereby suspended from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 

483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable 

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of the exceptions is 

established). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of 

respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar

R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of Maximum
Awards,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the for the quarterly  period ended September
30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Report"),  I,
Maxwell  Thomas,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
dates  presented and  consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

Dated: November 17, 2005


By: /s/ Maxwell Thomas
    ------------------
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer



This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLC and will be retained by Reitler Brown
& Rosenblatt LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 CFO Certification

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Schaffhauser, Executive Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Robert Schaffhauser             |  |  |  | Date: November 13, 2009
|Robert Schaffhauser                 |  |  |  |                        
|Executive Vice President of Finance |  |  |  |
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/
      Howard Thomson   
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| |        | Chief Executive Officer and
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | November 16, 2009          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---