Interim Decision #2461 

MATTER OF JAMES 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-20356519 

Decided by Board December 22, 1975 

Under the law of Dominica, British West Indies, legitimation may be accomplished only if 

the illegitimate child's mother and father subsequently marry each other. Since beneficiary's father, the U.S. citizen petitioner, has never been married to her mother, 

beneficiary, wt o was born out of wedlock in Dominica in February of 1988, has not been 

legitimated within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, and, therefore, is ineligible for preference classification 

under section :03(a)(1) of the Act as the unmarried daughter of petitioner. 

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Gustave Lippman, Esquire 

11 Park Place, Suite 1510 

New York, New York 10007 

In a decision dated January 24, 1975, the district director denied the 

petition to classify the beneficiary as the unmarried daughter of the 

United States citizen petitioner under section 203(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The petitioner has appealed from that decision. The appeal will be dismissed. 

The beneficiary was born in February of 1938 and is a native of 

Dominica, British West Indies. The record indicates that the petitioner 

is her father, but that her father has never been married to her mother. 

The district &rector denied the petitioner on the ground that the beneficiary did not qualify as the daughter of the petitioner for immigration 

purposes. 

In order to qualify as a "daughter" for preference purposes, the 

beneficiary must once have qualified as the child of the petitioner under 

section 101(b)(1) of the Act. Nazareno v. Attorney General, 512 F.2d 

936 (D.C. Cir., 1975), cert. denied, 44 U.S.L.W. 3201 (No. 74-1473); 

Matter of Coker, 14 I. & N. Dee. 521 (BIA 1074). The only subdivisions 

of section 101(b)(1) possibly relevant to this case are sections 

101(b)(1)(A) aid (C), which provide: 

The term "child" means an unmarried person under twenty-one years of age who is—

(A) a legitimate child; or 

* * * 

(C) a child legitimated under the law of the child's residence or domicile, or under the 

law of the father's residence or domicile, whether in or outside the United States, if such 

544 
Interim Decision #2461 

legitimation takes place before the child reaches the age of eighteen years and the child 

is in the legal custody of the legitimating parent or parents at the time of such 

legitimation. 

The term "legitimate" as used in section 101(b)(1)(A) refers solely to a 

child born in wedlock. See Matter of Dela Rosa, 14 I. & N. Dec. 728 

MIA 1974); Matter of Kubicka, 14 I. & N. Dec. 303 (BIA 1972). The 

beneficiary was not born in wedlock, and she therefore cannot qualify as 

the petitioner's legitimate child. 

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the beneficiary was legiti-

/dated in Dominica when the petitioner allegedly acknowledged his 

paternity to the Registrar General of Births and Deaths. Counsel, 

however, has not led us to any statute or court case relating to the law of 

Dominica which supports his assertion. 

We have inquired of the Library of Congress regarding legitimation 

in Dominica, and we have received a photocopy of the statute governing 

legitimation. The pertinent provisions of the legitimation Ordinance, III 

Laws of Dominica, chapter 196, provide: 

3. (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, where the parents of an illegitimate 

person marry or have married one another, whether before or after the commencement 

of this Ordinance the marriage shall, if the father of the illegitimate person was or is at 

the date of the marriage domiciled in the Colony, render that person, if living, legitimate from the commencement of this Ordinance, or from the date of the marriage, 

whichever last happens. 

(2) Nothing in this Ordinance shall operate to legitimate a person whose father or 

mother was married to a third person when the illegitimate person was born. 

It thus appears that legitimation in Dominica may be accomplished 

only if the illegitimate child's mother and father subsequently marry 

each other. This is evidently a typical requirement within the British 

West Indies. See Matter of Archer, 10 I. & N. Dec. 92 (BIA 1962). The 

decision of the district director was correct. 

ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 

545