alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011203EN.01003601.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/210/CFSP of 1 April 2011 on a European Union military operation in support of humanitarian assistance operations in response to the crisis situation in Libya (EUFOR Libya)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 89 of 5 April 2011
  )

On page 18, recital 11:

for:

| ‘(11) | In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not, therefore, participate in the financing of this operation,’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(11)

In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not, therefore, participate in the financing of this operation,’,

read:

| ‘(11) | In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not participate in the implementation of this Decision and therefore does not participate in the financing of this operation,’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(11)

In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not participate in the implementation of this Decision and therefore does not participate in the financing of this operation,’.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, B. Alva Schoomer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ B. Alva Schoomer B. Alva Schoomer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer September 27, 2007
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of RTIN Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley
L. Swanson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



 /s/ Stanley L. Swanson
-----------------------
Stanley L. Swanson
Chief Executive Officer
Marcy 21, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

s0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147424

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147424

COA: 307879

Macomb CC: 2007-004766-FC

MICHAEL RALPH GEORGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Maximum Awards, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Giuseppe Pino Baldassarre as Chief Executive Officer and Enzo Taddei as
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 17, 2007





/s/ Giuseppe Pino Baldassarre
--------------------------------
Name: Giuseppe Pino Baldassarre
Chief Executive Officer






/s/ Enzo Taddei
--------------------------------
Name: Enzo Taddei
Chief Financial Officer



                                     - 24 -
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHON CRAIG SINGLETON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (1:05-cr-00030-jpj-pms-2)

Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathon Craig Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathon Craig Singleton appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to amend his fine payment schedule

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Singleton, No. 1:05-cr-00030-jpj-pms-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer







I, B. Alva Schoomer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.







Date: September 13, 2005





/s/ B. Alva Schoomer

B. Alva Schoomer

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.0  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of TF Financial
Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we, Kent C. Lufkin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Dennis R. Stewart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and  (2)           The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ KENT C. LUFKIN
  
  /s/ DENNIS R.
  STEWARTKent C. Lufkin
  Dennis R.
  StewartPresident and
  Chief Executive Officer
  Executive Vice
  President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 26,
  2008
  March 26,
  2008
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Robert Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc., certifythat:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town Sports International Holdings,Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting;         By: /s/ Robert Giardina           Robert Giardina    *Chief Executive Officer*  Date: August 2, 2007      
25
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

(Second Chamber)

13 December 2007

Case F-27/07

**Asa Sundholm**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Appraisal – Career development report – 2001/2002 appraisal – Absence on medical grounds – Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance – Article 233 EC)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mrs Sundholm seeks annulment of the Commission’s decision of 2 June 2006
establishing her career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002, adopted pursuant to the judgment
of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 2005 in Case T-86/04 *Sundholm* v *Commission*, not published in the ECR.

**Held:**The action is dismissed. The parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

**Summary**

1.      *Officials – Reports procedure – Career development report – Judicial review – Limits*

*(Staff Regulations, Art. 43)*

2.      *Officials – Reports procedure – Career development report – Duty to state reasons – Scope*

*(Staff Regulations, Art. 43)*

1.      It is not for the Tribunal to substitute its assessment for that of the persons responsible for appraising the work of the
official under appraisal. The institutions of the Community enjoy a wide discretion in appraising the work of their officials.
Value judgements relating to officials in career development reports are not subject to review by the Tribunal except as regards
any irregularities of form or manifest errors of fact vitiating the assessments made by the administration or any misuse of
power.

(see para. 39)

See:

T-285/04 *Andrieu* v *Commission* [2006] ECR-SC I-A-2-161 and II‐A‐2‐775, para. 99; T-249/04 *Combescot* v *Commission* [2007] ECR-SC I-A-2-0000 and II-A-2-0000, para. 78

2.      Particular care must be taken with the statement of reasons for the career development report in certain situations, particularly
where the appeal assessor does not follow the recommendations of the Joint Evaluation Committee, where the career development
report includes appraisals which are less favourable than those in a previous report, or where the report is drawn up late
and the reporting officer is no longer the immediate superior who was acting as assessor during the period reported on .

(see para. 47)

See:

T-16/03 *Ferrer de Moncada* v *Commission* [2004] ECR-SC I‐A‐261 and II‐1163, paras 49, 50, 53 and 54; *Combescot* v *Commission*, para. 84
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137081 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 137081 

 COA: 274004 

Ingham CC: 05-000318-FH

CHARLES TYREE MITCHELL, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         683,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,589,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,291,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,353,000
<PP&E>                                       5,989,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,967,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,194,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    27,357,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,284,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,967,000
<SALES>                                     11,482,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,482,000
<CGS>                                        4,856,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,856,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               570,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,709,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,576,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. PINKNEY, et al.

229PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2016

Brian M. Rowlson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for U.S. Bank National Association.

Benjamin D. Busch, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Pinkney, Willie Lee, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 6th of December 2016 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of December 2016."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 19th day of December 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

Al-rc.RNEI GENERAL 

I 

i 

Honorable Lou hluq 

meoPts.ve &eretary-DlreeWtor 

stats GouM881oa fer the Bund 

IJBnd ost1ae 8e.tld* 

Auatia, Texas 

mar slrr 

ed rlth this request 

lth aertalu redwfr*?edualfumIr." When ah, a 

this dIepartmeat -8 ideally pe 8zr 

opriat1ao for 

ttaal 5 roadr 

I 

. . . . 
3tr 25 oader tho appreprlatloa a 0 8ode 

to thq State Gemmlqslolr for the Bllad W t& 

Ragulu Session old the 49th Leglolatum prorldeo for a put-8tr pwtor. p& ?rbmol @a+- ,.I’ 

erio~~,dll prevlde a like aoouab fer perter ):‘ 

. 

“neaoo advloe If the StMb cooel0oioO’ 

ler the a lla l4 o l lth o r lo oto d oup&8eat fr b l 

other hado ti oolary ef Veto4 

riser bo poWI& lo+ ia 8aeorte % tYPgr%O 

Begalar koofon 02 the 49th L6&olattwe u& 

ahe. dvieo so te vhether or llot the date car- 

* 

i. 

16 the 

l ppr ep r lIf a otued olo h o ther ua lo oo a er blay eed r P Ot in 

oonfllot with &ay r .lAted l tmlteo . 

x8 the Aot ereatiqf tha w8to Cadooloa tar tbe , 

alllul, whloh powtdeo {or its oegaQlBat10a ala tumetioao, 

autherlt~ is ~a to appoint ud fix tho ampautiom 0r 

a n l lea ~lvLo o t-Y .- b o theVW. r 

-4i:j.m ~~~~:,B~~o7o,*c.s. ) 

a8oeorry te 8ake effeotivo %ch 

The appU.mtios far a44 aaeegtaoo of trade *a 

t& uat0d am00 Obtem8oat is l @herioed 00d OOO& f00uo 8r e Qvpropriated l te th o opoc ffprpoo io el o lt& r iUd b y 
oubobetlon 9, seM66 RID 3&7, 

x c fo llooo th w@ ero that thl o upp&~.dlrrg o f the o a la irq qioo ueo r oliou4n l0 d %ithia thap*oprU- o 

tloao provldml if their uw for that pwpeo8 lo l uthorlrrd 

by the &raator tar tha United Stoteo Osvermaeat~ 

It Tot&tftandoamodvuseIIbJtheAdoral aovernm n to l tUor *ha hove 8~ opproted p&n for aid 

to the bll& u&d that th purpo~o for vhia& ouch funds are 

advanad are those samorated n the report to the Ebdwdl 

ao+rtrmo~t filed 

tion ml, lfq 

8eo 2itlo 42, lJ.S.C+A., sea16 lo gl?. 

-7 

U fra tb abwe tweted &tter that 

annum1 oalozioo re (1 8 ~otxI4 m8iam.m 0rrioo ati4 

(2) a part-ts80 porter ooro irral@od %u the T wAloo6ua'o 

reports to.* ?odem.l l uthorltieo M that owh w 

the lteu ther0UbWo beetr prOporljaPWWod+ u ?%I:" 

aamot, it foliwo tlmt the omwnto oa irraluded aad l p - 

pro ved p 080 *i$ h=tle bo l p eo lfp luo r p ewtn her lo ea 

v 

to m ~tihe& g a o ~ te~to o y qe)twlwoJ mewoe~ i& % 

&tocirdlqgl~~rtme-dvlwd that lt iotho *Inloa ef tU0 dogwSao*~ that tbo Stats ~4cmiool~ fos t&o 

~;lied :oa&Aorimd to oupplem~nt frert\udo Iricelwd fra 

the wnited St&or Oeto~~t tho o8larloo of (1) tbo tendlag M 0h s.l upM er +loor M d ( 2) l por t-tiw swtw, 6. the 

l xtat nppmwo4 b-y t&o Fwleml l uthorltlort 

a 

_-_.-~._- Ittleta - - 

lbolot&at 

,/. i._ ,: .‘i’~:
State of North Carolina v. David Anthony Manno, Defendant.

No. COA16-361

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Bernard BOWDEN, Defendant.

No. COA16-1074

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

NO ERROR IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.