alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Voluntary Services National Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Executive Committee to 
the Department of Veterans Affairs Voluntary Services (VAVS) National 
Advisory Committee (NAC) will meet October 24-25, 2005, at the John 
Ascuaga's Nugget, Sparks, Nevada. On October 24 the session will begin 
at 8:30 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. On October 25 the session will begin 
at 8:30 a.m. and end at 12 noon. the meeting is open to the public.
    The NAC consists of sixty-three national organizations and advises 
the Secretary, through the Under Secretary for Health, on the 
coordination and promotion of volunteer activities within VA health 
care facilities. The Executive Committee consists of nineteen 
representatives from the NAC member organizations and acts as the NAC 
governing body in the interim period between NAC annual meetings.
    Business topics for the October 24 morning session include: review 
of goals and objectives, review of minutes, Veterans Health 
Administration update, VAVS update of the Voluntary Service program's 
progress since the 2005 NAC annual meeting, Parke Board update, review 
of the 2005 annual meeting evaluations and the VAVS Partner's Treasurer 
report. The October 24 afternoon business session topics include: the 
2006 NAC Annual Meeting plans, workshop and plenary sessions/
suggestions. The October 25 morning business session topics include: 
2007 NAC Annual Meeting planning, review of recommendations from the 
2005 NAC Annual Meeting, subcommittee reports, standard operating 
procedure revisions, new business and Executive Committee appointments.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. However, interested persons may either 
attend or file statements with the Committee. Written statements may be 
filed either before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting and 
addressed to : Ms. Laura Balun, Designated Federal Officer, Voluntary 
Service Office (10C2), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420. Individuals interested in attending 
are encouraged to contact Ms. Balun at (202) 273-8952.

    Dated: September 19, 2005.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19281 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00206-CR

______________________________

FELIPE RUBIO GASPAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22385

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Felipe Rubio Gaspar appeals. We have received a motion from counsel asking us to extend

the time for filing his notice of appeal. He states that Gaspar was convicted June 12, 2008, that a

motion for new trial and arrest of judgment was filed, and that appellate counsel was appointed.

Counsel states that he asked the district clerk whether a notice of appeal had been filed and was told

that it had been. However, on October 15, 2008, counsel discovered that no notice of appeal had

been filed, and he filed a notice of appeal October 16, 2008.

With conviction and sentencing occurring June 12, 2008, and with a motion for new trial

being timely filed, the notice of appeal was due to be filed no more than ninety days later, on

September 10, 2008. The rule also provides a fifteen-day grace period, which expired September 25,

2008. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. The information before this Court reflects that no notice of appeal

or motion to extend time was filed until over twenty days after the expiration of the grace period. 

Our jurisdiction over an appeal is circumscribed by statute and rule, and we are not permitted

to engage in actions that will enlarge that jurisdiction. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this

Court is without jurisdiction. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993);see Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Further, courts of appeals may not employ Rule 2

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to suspend appellate time limits and thus expand our

jurisdiction. Garza v. State, 896 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
We are relying on counsel's statements concerning the timing of the events giving rise to the 1

notice of appeal. The relief sought must be granted by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

3

Therefore, based on the information before us, we must conclude the notice of appeal is

untimely.1

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: October 22, 2008

Date Decided: October 23, 2008

Do Not Publish
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Lewis BYRD

No. COA16-1025

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

NO ERROR IN PART; VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
Robbie Dean TERRY, Christopher Wayne Cook, Joshua Michael Barnhardt, Kevin Barringer, Brian M. Black, Barry Neal Burnette, Scott Casner, Demetrius Ray Clark, Robert Redell Dial, Malcom Eason, Gary W. Edwards, A.J. Gordon, Richard Hall, Derek Heintz, Lloyd Corey Hughes, Paul Daniel Hughes, Alan Michael Humphrey, Robert Mitchell Hunt, Stephen Hunt, Tully Langley, Charles Mack Latham, James Kelvin Locklear, Joe Travis Locklear, Johnny Ray Locklear, Michael Loukos, Samuel E. McLawhorn, Jerry L. Murphy, Rod Murphy, Nekime Matu Oxendine, Scott Richardson, Katherine Roberts, Jackie Rose, Eric C. Roten, Eric Schwartz, B. M. Sellers, Jr., Daniel T. Sharpe, Bradley D. Sudduth, Corey Thompson, Joshuas. Vernon, Michael Bailey, Jonathan Cochran, Kasey Cornwell, Blake Fisher, Angelis Geneao, Kathryn Geneao, Terry Gillespie, Brandon Sherrod Johnson, Mark Melvin, Jonathan Miller, Kurt D. Mills, Frank Odell, Jonathan Jason Sherill, Jason Stewart, Chad Thomas Walker and Benjamin Shane Young, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons v. STATE of North Carolina, Patrick L. McCrory, Governor of the State of North Carolina, in his official capacity, Lee Harris Roberts, State Budget Director, in his official capacity, Dr. Linda Morrison Combs, State Controller, in her official capacity, and Frank L. Perry, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, in his official capacity

No. 67P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Frederick S. Barbour, Attorney at Law, W. Scott Jones, Attorney at Law, Asheville, David A. Wijewickrama, Attorney at Law, Waynesville, for Terry, Robbie Dean, et al.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of March 2017 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 46/2005

of 13 January 2005         

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001 as regards the final date for submitting harvest and production declarations for the 2004/05 wine year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular Article 73 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2001, the declarations referred to in Articles 2 and 4 of that Regulation may be submitted for the 2004/05 wine year up to 15 January 2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 10 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1795/2003 (OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 13).

(2)OJ L 176, 29.6.2001, p. 14.

----
Joe E. Utley and Christine Utley, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth R. Smith d/b/a Smith Hardware and Garden, a North Carolina Partnership, Defendant.

No. COA16-463

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
### SCPW-16-0000677 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I
CHRISTOPHER LEE SLAVICK, Petitioner,

vs. HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ET AL., Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

U p o n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f 

### petitioner Christopher Lee Slavick’s motion for reconsideration, filed on November 7, 2016, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, November 16, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-16-0000677 16-NOV-2016 10:21 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**J. ROEBUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the“Registrant”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vera PALMER, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 81121.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Mary S. Choi, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Vera Palmer, appeals from her convictions for first-degree murder in violation of section 565.020.1, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We *693affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).
Kimarlo RAGLAND v. NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 251P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

*238Kimarlo A. Ragland, Pro se.

Ms. Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, For Nash-Rocky Mount Board Of Education.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Petitioner on the 8th of July 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Respondent, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of July 2016 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
DICESARE, et al. v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

156P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 26, 2017

Russ Ferguson, III, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Mark J. Horoschak, Attorney at Law, Brian Allen Hayles, Attorney at Law, Sarah Motley Stone, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System.

Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of May 2017 by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of May 2017."
State of North Carolina, v. Richard Pridgen, Defendant.

No. COA16-75

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

NO ERROR.
Melissa LOVELACE, Administrator of the Estate of Johnny Lee Whitley, Deceased Employee v. B & R AUTO SERVICE, INC., Employer; Younce Feed & Seed, Employer; Lee Plastering Service, Employer; Wentz Boiler & Climate Control, Employer; Jack's Jaguar Services, Inc., Employer; Southern Truck Service, Inc., Employer With Nationwide Insurance Company (for Southern Truck Service, Inc.) and NCIGA (for Southern Truck Service, Inc.)

No. 143P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Edward L. Pauley, Attorney at Law, Salisbury, for Lovelace, Melissa (Administrator).

George H. Pender, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

S. Abigail Littrell, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, John Tomei, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Viral V. Mehta, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Southern Truck Service, Inc., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd of May 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge

for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 96-1809

___________

Calixto Raymond Ledon, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 18, 1996

 Filed: December 24, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In 1995, Calixto Raymond Ledon pleaded guilty to distributing

cocaine. The district court1

 sentenced him to 70 months

imprisonment and four years supervised release. Ledon did not file

a direct criminal appeal. Ledon filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion, asserting that his criminal conviction violated the Double

Jeopardy Clause's prohibition against multiple punishments for the

same offense, because his property had previously been

administratively forfeited pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4) and

(a)(6). The district court denied relief, and Ledon appeals.

Ledon's claim is foreclosed for the reasons set forth in

United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2148-49 (1996) (civil
-2-

forfeitures under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and (7) are neither

"punishment" nor criminal for purposes of Double Jeopardy Clause);

United States v. One 1970 36.9' Columbia Sailing Boat, 91 F.3d

1053, 1056 (8th Cir. 1996) (Ursery applies to forfeitures under

§ 881(a)(4)); and United States v. Kress, 88 F.3d 664, 665-66 (8th

Cir. 1996) (Ursery forecloses a double jeopardy claim involving

administrative forfeiture).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
STATE v. Jimmy Lee WILLIAMS

196P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Mr. Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Williams, Jimmy Lee (Jr.).

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Mr. Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*226The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of May 2016 by State of NC to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
Peter BUFFA and wife, Stacy Buffa, Plaintiffs, v. CYGNATURE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. ; Granite Hardwoods, Inc.; The Hardwood Company; Windsor Window Company d/b/a Windsor Windows and Doors; Christopher Wotell; and Gary Sovel, Defendants.

No. COA16-237

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 30, 2016

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

                               THE STATE OF TEXAS
                               SECRETARY OF STATE

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF

                      RESTAURANT TEAMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                          FORMERLY: FRESH'N LITE, INC.
                             CHARTER NO. 1371543-0


The  undersigned,  as Secretary  of State of Texas,  hereby  certifies  that the
attached  Articles of Amendment for the above named entity have been received in
this office and are found to conform to law.


ACCORDINGLY  the  undersigned, as  Secretary  of  State,  and by  virtue  of the
authority  vested in the  Secretary by law,  hereby issues this  certificate  of
Amendment.

Dated:         September 16, 1998

Effective:     September 16, 1998






[GRAPHIC OF THE STATE OF 
 TEXAS SEAL OMITTED]




                                             /s/ Alberto R. Gonzales
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Alberto R. Gonzales
                                                 Secretary of State
STATE of North Carolina v. Terance Germaine MALACHI

No. 142P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. Aaron Thomas Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Malachi, Terance Germaine.

Mr. John R. Green, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Ms. Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Malachi, Terance Germaine.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 4th of May 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of May 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
UAN Q2 2014 Exhibit 10.3


Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT TO 
GP SERVICES AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO GP SERVICES AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of June 27, 2014 by and between CVR Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("MLP"), CVR GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("GP"), and CVR Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("CVR", and collectively with MLP and GP, the "Parties" and each, a "Party").


RECITALS


The Parties entered into a GP Services Agreement effective as of November 29, 2011 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which GP agreed to provide the GP Services to the GP Services Recipients.  The Parties desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth in this Amendment.


The parties agree as follows:


1.Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.


2.Terms.  


(a)The definition of “Share-Based Compensation” contained in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety.


(b)The term “Personnel Costs” contained in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:


"Personnel Costs" means all compensation costs incurred by an employer in connection with the employment by such employer of applicable personnel, including all payroll and benefits but excluding severance costs.


3.Effective Date.  Each of the amendments contemplated by this Amendment is effective as of April 1, 2014 (the "Effective Date").


4.Ratify Agreement.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement will remain unamended and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  The amendments provided herein will be limited precisely as drafted and will not constitute an amendment of any other term, condition or provision of the Agreement.  References in the Agreement to "Agreement", "hereof", "herein", and words of similar import are deemed to be a reference to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.


5.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which constitute one agreement that is binding upon each of the parties, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the same counterpart.











The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above, but effective as of the Effective Date.


	
				
	CVR Partners, LP
By: CVR GP, LLC, its general partner






	CVR GP, LLC

	By:
	/s/ Mark A. Pytosh
	By:
	/s/ Susan M. Ball

	Name:
	Mark A. Pytosh
	Name:
	Susan M. Ball

	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer and President
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer








	
		
	CVR Energy, Inc.







	By:
	/s/ John J. Lipinski

	Name:
	John J. Lipinski

	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer and President