alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012013EN.01001002.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Sison v Council

(Case T-341/07) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Actions for annulment - Adaptation of heads of claim - Judicial review - Statement of reasons - Conditions for implementation of a Community measure freezing funds)

2012/C 13/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jose Maria Sison (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Fermon, A. Comte, H. Schultz, D. Gürses and W. Kaleck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, E. Finnegan and R. Szostak, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by by C. Wissels, M. de Mol, Y. de Vries, M. Noort, J. Langer and M. Bulterman,, acting as Agents); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by S. Behzadi Spencer and I. Rao, acting as Agents), and European Commission (represented initially by P. Aalto and S. Boelaert, and subsequently by S. Boelaert and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Following the judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2009 in Case T-341/07 Sison v Council [2009] ECR II–3625, application for compensation for damage allegedly sustained by the applicant as a result of the restrictive measures taken against him with a view to combating terrorism

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action for compensation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action for compensation;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for annulment are concerned, the costs incurred by Jose Maria Sison in addition to its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for annulment are concerned, the costs incurred by Jose Maria Sison in addition to its own costs;

| 3. | Orders Mr Sison to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for compensation are concerned, the costs incurred by the Council in addition to his own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Sison to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for compensation are concerned, the costs incurred by the Council in addition to his own costs;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
MCD-6.30.2014-Ex 10(s)






Exhibit 10(s)
In recognition of his responsibilities as non-executive Chairman and upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (“Board”) of McDonald’s Corporation (the “Company”), the Compensation Committee of the Board awarded Andrew J. McKenna a grant of 8,465 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on June 11, 2014.  Each RSU represents the right to receive, on the settlement date, one share of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s discretion, cash equal to the fair market value thereof.  The RSUs will be settled on the later of (i) one year from the date of grant or (ii) Mr. McKenna’s retirement from the Board.  The RSUs will immediately be settled upon Mr. McKenna’s death or if his service on the Board terminates because he becomes disabled. 
Mr. McKenna also received previous grants of RSUs, on the same terms as described herein, as follows: 8,637 RSUs in 2013, 9,474 RSUs in 2012, 10,434 RSUs in 2011, 12,453 RSUs in 2010, 14,388 RSUs in 2009, 14,222 RSUs in 2008, 17,000 RSUs in 2007, 15,000 RSUs in 2006 and 10,000 RSUs in 2005. The prior grants are disclosed in Exhibit 10(t) to Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 31, 2013; Exhibit 10(n) to Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 6, 2012; Exhibit 10(o) to Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2011; Exhibit 10(p) to Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2010; Exhibit 10(q) to Forms 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 6, 2009, August 6, 2008 and August 6, 2007, respectively, and on Forms 8-K filed with the SEC on May 31, 2006 and May 16, 2005, respectively.
----

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 27 April 2006

on the closure of the accounts of the European Agency for Reconstruction for the financial year 2004

(2006/825/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

The President

Josep BORRELL FONTELLES

The Secretary-General

Julian PRIESTLEY

----

(1)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 19.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2068/2004 (OJ L 358, 3.12.2004, p. 2).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

(6)  The figures for 2003 have been adjusted from those previously presented to reflect a change in accounting practices.

NB: Any discrepancies in totals are due to the effects of rounding.

Source: The Agency's data — This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts.

----

RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for Reconstruction for the financial year 2004

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

----

(1)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 19.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2068/2004 (OJ L 358, 3.12.2004, p. 2).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

----
Jacqueline Renee CROCKER v. Transylvania County Department of Social Services Director Tracy JONES

No. 140P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Jackson R. Price, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Jones, Tracy (Director).

Donald H. Barton, Attorney at Law, Brevard, for Crocker, Jacqueline Renee.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 5th of May 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01


                      RED ROOF INNS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1996         1997         1998
                                                                --------     --------     --------
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes and extraordinary item               $ 39,676     $ 42,723     $ 56,125

Fixed charges, excluding capitalized  interest                    45,984       50,288       49,667
                                                                --------     --------     --------

Earnings before fixed charges                                   $ 85,660     $ 93,011     $105,792
                                                                ========     ========     ========

Fixed charges:
  Rent expense                                                  $ 12,622     $ 12,248     $  9,926
                                                                ========     ========     ========

  Portions of rent representative of an interest factor (1/3)   $  4,207     $  4,083     $  3,309 

  Interest expense                                                41,777       46,205       46,358
                                                                --------     --------     --------

  Fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest                   45,984       50,288       49,667

   Capitalized interest                                            2,841        2,846        2,541        

        Total fixed charges                                     $ 48,825     $ 53,134     $ 52,208
                                                                ========     ========     ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                 1.8 x        1.8 x        2.0 x
</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

T.S., Appellant 

and 

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Muskegon, MI, Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 14-172 

Issued: September 28, 2015 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

ORDER REMANDING CASE 

Before: 

PATRICIA HOWARD FITZGERALD, Acting Chief Judge 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge 

On October 30, 2013 appellant filed a timely application for review of the June 6 and 

June 25, 2013 decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) concerning 

his schedule award claim. Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 

20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case. 

On April 28, 2014 the Board issued an order to complete record within 30 days.2

 Upon 

inspection of the case record, however, the Board finds that the Director of OWCP has not 

produced the complete case record or shown cause for not complying. As the Board is unable to 

render a fully informed adjudication of the case, it will remand the case to OWCP, as set forth in 

the April 28, 2014 order, for reconstruction and proper assemblage of the case record, to be 

followed by the issuance of an appropriate final decision to protect appellant’s appeal rights. 

 1

 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. 

2

 As transmitted, the case record did not include: appellant’s Form CA-7 dated July 31, 2003; a statement of 

accepted facts; the September 27, 2011 permanent impairment evaluation by Dr. John W. Ellis; OWCP’s medical 

adviser’s April 5, 2013 review of Dr. Ellis’ rating; and any other claim (File Nos. xxxxxx096 and xxxxxx784) that 

might explain the clinical findings or diagnoses on which appellant’s previous schedule awards were based. 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 25 and 6, 2013 decisions of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs are set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings 

consistent with this order of the Board. 

Issued: September 28, 2015 

Washington, DC 

 

 Patricia Howard Fitzgerald, Acting Chief Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthonio Shontari FARRAR

No. 112P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

David Weiss, Attorney at Law, for Farrar, Anthonio Shontari.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of April 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 10th of April 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of April 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4224 

For the relief of Victor Hugo Santos. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Victor Hugo Santos. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR VICTOR 

4 HUGO SANTOS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Victor Hugo Santos shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4224 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Victor Hugo 

2 Santos enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Victor Hugo Santos, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4224 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Victor Hugo Santos shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING v. REAVES

75P17-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Ms. Margaret Reaves, For Reaves, Margaret Ann.

Mr. G. Benjamin Milam, Attorney at Law, For Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of September 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Injunction:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-144495, 333-140187, 333-116600, 333-107822 and 333-74976) of Targeted Genetics Corporation and in the related Prospectus and to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-143604, 333-116601, 333-61738, 333-48220, 333-78523, 333-58907, 333-28151, 333-03889) pertaining to the Targeted Genetics Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan, 1992 Restated Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock OptionPlan, 2000 Genovo Roll-over Stock Option Plan, and Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors of our report dated March 18, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Targeted Genetics Corporation included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 30, 2009
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2009 – DSV Road v Commission**

**(Case T-219/07)**

Customs union – Importation of diskettes originating in Thailand – Post-clearance recovery of import duties – Application for remission of import duties – Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EC) No 2913/92

1.                     *Own resources of the European Communities – Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties (Council Regulation No 2913/92,
Art. 220(2)(b)); Commission Regulation No 2454/93, Art. 81(6)) (see paras 35-38, 40)*

2.                     *Own resources of the European Communities – Repayment or remission of import duties – Fairness clause established by Article
239 of the Community Customs Code (Council Regulation No 2913/92, Art. 239; Commission Regulation No 2454/93, Art. 904(c))
(see paras 55-57)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of the Commission decision of 24 April 2007 informing the Belgian authorities that they may proceed with post-clearance recovery of import duties on diskettes originating in Thailand and that there are no grounds for granting remission of those duties (file reference REC 05/02). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the application; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders DSV Road NV to pay the costs. |
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00112-CV

______________________________

IN RE: BILLY RAY JOHNSON,

BY AND THROUGH NEXT FRIEND, LUE WILSON

 

Original Mandamus Proceeding

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Billy Ray Johnson, by and through next friend Lue Wilson, has filed in this Court

a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the trial court's earlier appointment of a guardian

ad litem for Johnson. His petition also contained a request for emergency relief which we deemed

a motion to stay proceedings, including a hearing scheduled for October 10, 2008. We denied that

motion and directed Johnson to supplement the record in this matter with the orders resulting from

the October 10, 2008, hearing.

Johnson's counsel notified this Court ofthe events of the October 10 hearing, explaining that

the orders are not yet available. Counsel represented that the parties reached a settlement of the

controversies among them and that, as a result of the settlement agreement, the order appointing the

guardian ad litem will be dissolved. We take these representations by counsel as facts that render

moot the issues presented in the petition for writ of mandamus concerning the appointment of the

guardian ad litem. 

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot Johnson's petition for writ of mandamus.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: October 21, 2008

Date Decided: October 22, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, October 3, 2005.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of 
Board Members; 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 23, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19401 Filed 9-23-05; 2:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID R. MANSET
, Appellant,

v.

BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 0703

[ May 4, 2023 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings

and the School Board of Broward County ; L.T. Case No. DOAH20

- 3492TTS

.

Robert F. McKee and Brittany M. Fox of Robert F. McKee, P.A. Tampa, for appellant.

Elizabeth W. Nei berger and Denise M. Heekin of Bryan Miller Olive P.A., Miami, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-030]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: October 3, 2005 at 2 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. TA-421-6 (Market Disruption) (Circular Welded Non-Alloy 
Steel Pipe from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is scheduled 
to transmit its determination on market disruption to the President and 
the United States Trade Representative on October 3, 2005.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: September 22, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-19247 Filed 9-22-05; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P