alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas King, Chief Financial Officer of Greenlite Ventures
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                    

| | By:    | /s/ Douglas King       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | DOUGLAS KING           
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | February 22, 2007      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
  be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10949

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARILYNN LOUISE PAYNE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-386-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marilynn Louise

Payne has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Payne has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 4

- 0245 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 187

_____________________________
R IAD A KEL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Cla y County

. Mark B orello
, Judge

. Riad Akel, Daytona Beach, pro se

.
No A ppearance for Appellee.

April 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

E DWARDS , C.J.
, and B OATWRIGHT and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Kornegay Family Farms, LLC, et al. v. Cross Creek Seed, Inc.

187PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Steven B. Epstein, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cross Creek Seed, Inc.

L. Neal Ellis, Jr., Attorney at Law, Wake Forest, J. P. Williamson, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Kornegay Family Farms, LLC, et al.

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the conditional motion filed on the 13th of May 2016 by NC Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
STATE v. Robert Wayne STANLEY

376P02-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Stanley, Robert Wayne.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of March 2017 by Defendant to Dismiss the Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald WEBB

No. COA16-1228

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

NO ERROR.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4109 

To require the President to designate a legal public holiday to be known 

as National First Responders Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. MAFFEI, Mr. 

ISRAEL, Mr. OWENS, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. GRIMM, Ms. CLARK

of Massachusetts, Mr. FATTAH, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of 

New York, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

KENNEDY, Mr. ENYART, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, 

Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. RUIZ, and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the President to designate a legal public holiday 

to be known as National First Responders Day. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL FIRST RESPOND4 ERS DAY. 

5 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the President shall issue a proclamation 

7 that designates a date as a legal public holiday to be 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4109 IH

1 known as ‘‘National First Responders Day’’, which shall 

2 be treated in the same manner as a legal public holiday 

3 described in section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,625
<PP&E>                                         435,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Manuel A. Henriquez, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: May 4, 2017 | By:    | /S/ MANUEL A. HENRIQUEZ

                                   |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | Manuel A. Henriquez                                              |
|              |   | Chairman, President, and                                         |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
STATE of North Carolina v. James Howard KILLIAN

No. 459P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017.

Jeffrey William Gillette, Attorney at Law, Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Killian, James Howard.

Yvonne B. Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of December 2016 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st of December 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

TYRE JAMAR MAYERS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30190

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00352-MJP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Tyre Jamar Mayers appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty

plea to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Mayers contends that the district court erred in determining

that his prior conviction for theft in the first degree, in violation of former Revised

FILED

MAR 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Code of Washington § 9A.56.030(1)(b), was a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. §

2K2.1. As Mayers concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v.

Alderman, 601 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.
Steven and Deborah BRADY, Next of Kin of Eric A. Brady, Deceased Employee, Plaintiff-Appellees, v. BEST BUY CO., INC., Employer, New Hampshire Ins. Co., Carrier (Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Third-Party Administrator), Defendant-Appellants.

No. COA17-315

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

AFFIRMED.
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 415 

For the relief of Francisca Lino. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Francisca Lino. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 FRANCISCA LINO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Francisca Lino shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 415 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Francisca Lino en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Francisca Lino, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 415 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Francisca Lino shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with
In the MATTER OF: D.L.A.D.

No. COA17-262

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

VACATED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50411

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN V. MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CR-128-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 20, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Juan Martinez has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief, Martinez’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. Martinez’s motion for appointment of substitute

counsel is DENIED.
(109 So. 399)

No. 27401.

#### WHITE v. WHITE.

(June 28, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Divorce <&wkey;l46.

In divorce action, where judge heard plaintiff’s evidence, including testimony of defendant under cross-examination, and heard on behalf of defendant testimony of corespondent named in plaintiff’s petition, refusal to hear further testimony for defendant before granting judgment for plaintiff *held*error.

2. Appeal and error <&wkey;987(l).

Appellate court has jurisdiction over questions of fact as well as of law in civil cases.

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; William H. Byrnes, Jr., Judge.

Suit by James J. White against Lillian McGee White. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Judgment annulled, and case remanded.

Loys Gharbonnet, of New Orleans, for appellant.

John D. Nix, Jr., and Walter W. Wright, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is a suit for divorce on statutory grounds. The defendant, answering the suit, denied the allegations of the petition, and, as plaintiff in reco’nvention, asked for a divorce on the same ground or, in the alternative, for a separation from bed and board on the ground of cruel treatment. The court gave judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

*719[1, 2] After hearing all of the evidence off erred by the plaintiff, including the testimony of the defendant under cross-examination, and having heard, on behalf of the defendant, the testimony of the corespondent named in the plaintiff’s petition, the judge announced that he would not hear any further evidence for the defendant. She and the corespondent named in the plaintiff’s petition had both denied in their testimony the charge made in the plaintiff’s petition. Her attorney then announced what facts he intended to prove by certain witnesses who were in court, but the judge refused to hear them, saying that he would not believe them under oath.

We are constrained to hold that the judge erred in rejecting the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses without hearing them. Even though the trial judge might not have believed the testimony offered by the defendant, it should have been heard and considered, and especially should it have been received in order to be considered by the appellate court, which has jurisdiction oyer questions of fact as well as of law in civil cases.

The judgment is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the civil district court for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion. The plaintiff, appellee, is to pay the costs of this appeal. All other costs are to depend upon the final judgment.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-137137,333-124493, 333-117316, 333-109189, 333-99399, 333-82592, 333-45643, 333-86697,333-86719 and 333-20387) of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. of our reportdated March 31, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statementswhich appear in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatoryparagraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Seattle, WA

March 31, 2008

 

----
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008 – TridonicAtco v OHIM (Intelligent Voltage Guard)**

**(Case T-297/07)**

Community trade mark – Application for the Community figurative mark Intelligent Voltage Guard – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation(EC) No 40/94

1.                     *Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Seperate examination
of the grounds for refusal in relation to each of the products or services referred to in the application registration – Duty
to state reasons for a refusal of registration (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)) (see para. 22)*

2.                     *Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid
of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 29-39)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 May 2007 (Case R 108/2007-2) concerning an application to register the figurative mark Intelligent Voltage Guard as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | TridonicAtco GmbH & Co. KG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark Intelligent Voltage Guard for goods in Classes 9 and 11 – Application No W874778 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the application; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders TridonicAtco & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137037 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137037 

 COA: 285598 

St. Joseph CC: 06-013744-FC

JOSEPH MICHAEL COLWELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk