alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1909

JONATHAN JEROME BARDELL,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY,

Creditor - Appellee.

HELEN M. MORRIS,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00036-JPB; BK-05-06808)

Submitted: August 7, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron C. Amore, James T. Kratovil, KRATOVIL & AMORE, PLLC, Charles

Town, West Virginia, for Appellant. Angela N. Watson, DRAPER &

GOLDBERG, PLLC, Leesburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Jerome Bardell appeals from the district court’s

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that he

was unable to cure the arrearage in his mortgage payments when a

foreclosure sale occurred prior to his filing of a petition in

bankruptcy and granting Branch Banking & Trust relief from the

automatic stay to record the foreclosure sale deed. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bardell v.

Branch Banking & Trust Co., Nos. 3:07-cv-00036-JPB; BK-05-06808

(N.D. W. Va. Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ACCEPTED 03-14-00571-CR 5006398 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/23/2015 1:35:36 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
<PAGE>   1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  
                                                                                      EXHIBIT 12.01
                      RED ROOF INNS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

                                                                      1994          1995          1996
                                                                      -----         -----         ----
<S>                                                              <C>              <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes                                       $   28,100       $  30,838    $  39,676
                                                                       
Fixed charges, excluding capitalized  interest                       55,491          55,016       45,984
                                                                 ----------       ---------    ---------

Earnings before fixed charges                                    $   83,591       $  85,854    $  85,660
                                                                 ==========       =========    =========
Fixed charges:
  Rent expense                                                   $    9,952       $  11,269    $  12,622
                                                                 ==========       =========    =========
                                                                        

  Portions of rent representative of an                          $   3,317        $   3,756    $   4,207
   interest factor (1/3)                                                                        

  Interest expense                                                  52,174           51,260       41,777
                                                                 ---------        ---------    --------- 
                                                                      

  Fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest                     55,491           55,016       45,984
                                       
   Capitalized interest                                                               1,547        2,841
                                                                 ---------        ---------    --------- 
                                                                                                   
        Total fixed charges                                      $  55,491        $  56,563    $  48,825
                                                                 =========        =========    =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                   1.5 x            1.5 x        1.8 x
</TABLE>



                                      45
EX10.1 Lease Modification


Exhibit 10.1






FIRST MODIFICATION TO LEASE DATED OCTOBER 24, 2012
BY AND BETWEEN
CAL-SORRENTO, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP AS LESSOR
AND
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS, INC., A DELAWARE 
CORPORATION AND HALOZYME, INC., A CALIFORNIA 
CORPORATION AS LESSEE


The fourth sentence of Section 10 of the Work Letter attached to and made part of said Lease is hereby modified to state as follows:
If possession is not delivered b October 1, 2013, as the same may be extended under the terms of the Work Letter executed by Parties, Lessee may, at its option, by notice in writing, on or before October 11, 2013, (except as extended under the terms of the Work Letter) cancel this Lease, in which event the Parties shall be discharged from all obligations hereunder.
All other terms and conditions of said Lease shall remain the same.


CAL-SORRENTO, LTD.,                HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED                A DELAWARE CORPORATION
PARTNERSHIP, BY H&M                AND HALOZYME, INC., A
INVESTMENTS                    CALIFORNIA CORPORATION


BY: /s/Steve Higgins                                         BY: /s/ Kurt Gustafson                 
Steve Higgins – General Partner                Kurt Gustafson
DATE:    March 19, 2013                                          DATE:   March 18, 2013
# C_2010148EN.01005002.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/50

---

Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Caisse Nationale des Caisses d'Epargne et de Prévoyance v Commission

(Case T-289/07) (1)

1

2010/C 148/82

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
OFFICERS" CERTIFICATE



To:       i)  Bank One, National Association, not in its individual capacity but
              solely as Eligible Lender Trustee,

          ii) Bankers Trust Company,
              New York, N.Y., Indenture Trustee,


     In  accordance  with  Section  3.08 of the  Servicing  Agreement  among SMS
Student Loan Trust 2000-B, as Issuer, USA Servicing  Corporation  formerly known
as USA Group Loan Services, Inc., as Servicer ("Servicer"),  USA Group Secondary
Market Services, Inc., as Seller, and Bank One, National Association, not in its
individual capacity but solely as Eligible Lender Trustee,  dated as of April 1,
2000 ("Servicing Agreement"),  the undersigned,  in their official capacities as
Authorized Officers of Servicer, hereby certify as follows:

     a) a review of the  activities  of  Servicer  during  the  period  from the
Closing Date to September  30, 2000 and of its  performance  has been made under
such officers" supervision, and

     b) to the best of such officers" knowledge,  based on such review, Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing  Agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

     Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Servicing Agreement.

In witness whereof,  USA Servicing  Corporation formerly known as USA Group Loan
Services,  Inc.,  has caused this Annual  Statement as to  Compliance to be duly
executed as of September 30, 2000.

USA Servicing Corporation formerly known as USA GROUP LOAN SERVICES, INC.


by /s/ Laurie S. Blackburn
Laurie S. Blackburn, Vice President



by /s/ Daniel L. Yost
Daniel L. Yost, Senior Vice President


cc: USA Group Secondary Market Services, Inc.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4218 

To reauthorize the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself and Mr. PASTOR of Arizona) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yuma Crossing Na5 tional Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF YUMA CROSSING NATIONAL 

7 HERITAGE AREA. 

8 Section 7 of the Yuma Crossing National Heritage 

9 Area Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106– 

10 319; 114 Stat. 1284) is amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JAMES BRANCH,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 16957

D.C. Nos. 4:16

- cv

- 01 643

- PJH

4:04

- cr

- 40022

- PJH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15 , 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Federal p risoner James Branch appeals from the district court’s denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

We review the district court’s denial of a section 2255 motion de novo, see United

States v. Reves , 774 F .3d 562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16957

Branch ’s section 2255 motion argued that Johnson v. United States , 135 S.

Ct. 2551 (2015), rendered the residual clause in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2)

unconstitutionally vague, and therefore his prior California rob bery conviction

could no longer support his career offender sentence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. This

argument is foreclosed by Beckles v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 88 6 , 895 (2017)

.

The government’s concession in the district court that the residual clause i n

§ 4B1.2(a)(2) wa s void does not bind this co urt

. See United States v. Perez

- Silvan

,

861 F.3d 935, 938 n.2 (9th Cir. 2017) (courts “are not bound by a party’s

concession as to the meaning of the law” (internal quotations omitted)).

Branch contends, for the first time in his reply brief, that he is actually

innocent of being a career offender because his predicate California robbery

conviction no longer constitute s a crime of violence under the 2016 version of

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2). Even if this argumen t were properly before this court, see

Padgett v. Wright

, 587 F.3d 983, 985

- 86 n.2 (9th Cir. 20 09 ), it would be

foreclosed. See United States v. Chavez

- Cuevas , 862 F.3d 729, 740 (9th Cir. 2017)

(reaffirming United States v. Becerril

- Lopez , 541 F.3d 881 (9 th Cir. 2008), which

held that California robbery categorically qualifies as a crime of violence).

AFFIRMED.
Cause No. 12

- 15

- 00294

- CR

IN RE: David Mark Davis II § § § § § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH JUDICIAL REG ION

TYLER , TEXAS

RELATOR ’ S MOTION FOR EMERGEN CY RELIEF

TO HONORABLE J U STICES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES THE RELATOR , David Mark Davis II, who moves the Honorable Court to

decide his Petition for Mandamus at the earliest possible time . In support, Davis would show the
following:

1. This mandamus action is directly related to a habeas corpus action and seeks to
compel the Honorable Wes Suiter to fulfill his ministerial duty to complete a

Certificate of Defendant ’s Right to Appeal in Relator ’ s h abeas case.

2. The completion of the Certificate of Defendant ’s Right to App eal is required for this
Court to have jurisdiction to hear Mr. Davis ’ appeal of the Respondent’s denial of

Relator ’s habeas petition.

3. In Texas, c ourt’s are commanded to dispose with an application for writ of habeas
corpus at the “ earliest day which the ju dge can devote to hearing the cause of the
applicant. ” See Tex. C. Crim. Proc. Art 11.11.

4. It would only make sense that this case, since dire ctly rel ated to the habeas case,
would be governed by the expedited timeline set forth in Art. 11.11. As such, this
Court would be required to expedite this mandamus action

PRAYER

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED

, Relator moves the Honorable Court grant
this Motion for Emergency Relief and for all other relief Relator might be justly entitled. ACCEPTED 12-15-00294-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 12/14/2015 12:00:00 AM

Pam Estes CLERKRespectfully submitted,

_________________________ David Mark Davis II Relator , Pro Se 11 Glenview Court Lufkin, Texas 75901 (936) 238-850

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that at the time of electronically filing this case, I served the foregoing pleading by electronic service upon the following:

Respondent: via email to wsuiter@angelinacounty.net

Real Party in Interest: via email to ejones@angelinacounty.net

David Mark Davis II
# C_2010246EN.01003901.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/39

---

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Huta Buczek and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-440/07, T-465/07 and T-1/08) (1)

1

()

2010/C 246/66

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered the partial removal of the joined cases from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 08.03.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of June, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer























---
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4283 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to authorize 

the Secretary of the Interior to maintain or replace certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation 

services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4283 EH

1 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILI2 TIES AND STRUCTURES AT SMITH GULCH. 

3 Section 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 

4 Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(24)(D)) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: ‘‘The Secretary shall also authorize 

6 or continue to authorize maintenance or replacement of 

7 facilities and structures listed in this subparagraph for 

8 commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch whose loca9 tion is defined above. The facilities and structures referred 

10 to in this subparagraph are— 

11 ‘‘(i) motorized landscaping equipment, such as 

12 lawnmowers and weed trimmers; 

13 ‘‘(ii) chainsaws; 

14 ‘‘(iii) gasoline-powered electrical generators and 

15 associated electrical transmission facilities; 

16 ‘‘(iv) hydroelectric generators and associated 

17 electrical transmission facilities; 

18 ‘‘(v) gasoline-powered water pumps for fire sup19 pression; 

20 ‘‘(vi) transition from propane to electrical light21 ing; 

22 ‘‘(vii) solar energy systems; and 
3 

•HR 4283 EH

1 ‘‘(viii) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for power 

2 storage.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4283 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to auIdaho, and for other purposes. commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch in or replace certain facilities and structures for thorize the Secretary of the Interior to maintain
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4262 

To apply the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2014 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To apply the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau Advisory Com5 mission Transparency Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4262 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF FACA. 

2 Section 1013 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

3 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5493) is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(h) APPLICATION OF FACA.—Notwithstanding any 

6 provision of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 

7 U.S.C. App.), such Act shall apply to each advisory com8 mittee of the Bureau.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2023321EN.01007001.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/70

---

Action brought on 27 July 2023 — UniCredit Bank v SRB

(Case T-446/23)

(2023/C 321/79)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: UniCredit Bank AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and

| — | order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-410/23, BAWAG PSK v SRB.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4224 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4224

                 For the relief of Victor Hugo Santos.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2014

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Victor Hugo Santos.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR VICTOR HUGO SANTOS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Victor Hugo Santos shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Victor Hugo Santos enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Victor Hugo Santos, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Victor Hugo 
Santos shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie Levord TAYLOR

No. 132P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 24, 2017

Eddie Levord Taylor, for Taylor, Eddie Levord.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 24th of April 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of April 2017."