alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      23.1**

**CONSENT        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements        on Form        S-3 (Nos. 333-144495, 333-140187, 333-116600, 333-107822, 333-74976, 333-50214,        333-33192, 333-86509, 333-51625) of Targeted Genetics Corporation and in        the        related Prospectus and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration        Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-143604, 333-116601, 333-61738, 333-48220,        333-78523, 333-58907, 333-28151, 333-03889) pertaining to the Targeted Genetics        Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan, 1992 Restated Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock        Option Plan, and 2000 Genovo Roll-over Stock Option Plan, and Stock Option        Plan        for Nonemployee Directors of our report dated March 20, 2008, with respect        to        the consolidated financial statements Targeted Genetics Corporation included        in        the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

|                                             |   |   |                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |   |   | /s/ Ernst                & Young LLP |
|                                                  |   |   |                                               |
|                                             |   |   |                                          |
| Seattle,                WashingtonMarch 20, 2008 |   |   |                                          |
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

 
  

May     , 2013 
  

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL 
 [Director]

 Board of Directors 
 McDermott
International, Inc. 
 RE: RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD 
 Dear [Director]: 
 I am pleased to advise you that the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Committee”) of McDermott International, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a grant to you (the “Grant”) of [l] shares of restricted stock under the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on May 13, 2013 (the “Grant Date”). A copy of the Prospectus
relating to the Plan, which includes a copy of the Plan, has previously been made available to you. The restricted stock award will have no Period of Restriction (as defined in the Plan), and the restrictions on the Grant will lapse on the Grant
Date. 
 Restricted Stock Award. On the Grant Date, you will have the right to be issued the number of shares of Common Stock of the
Company set forth above. Such shares will be issued to you in book-entry form in an account in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, absent other instructions from you, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. 

Tax Consequences. You are solely responsible for the taxes associated with the Grant, and you should consult with and rely on your own tax
advisor, accountant or legal advisor as to the tax consequences to you of the Grant. A general description of the tax consequences relating to the type of award provided through the Grant is included in the Prospectus. 

Securities and Exchange Commission Requirements. Because you are a Section 16 insider, this type of transaction must be
reported on a Form 4 before the end of the second
(2nd) business day following the Grant Date. Please
be aware that if you are going to reject the Grant, you should do so as soon as possible to avoid potential Section 16 liability. Please advise Kim Wolford and Dennis Edge immediately by e-mail, fax or telephone call if you intend to reject
this grant. 
 Absent such notice of rejection, we will prepare and file the required Form 4 on your behalf (pursuant to your standing
authorization for us to do so) within the required two business day deadline. 








  
 -2-

  
  
  

 You are also deemed to be an “affiliate” for purposes of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and accordingly subject to Rule 144. Rule 144 is applicable only when the shares are sold, so you need not take any action under Rule 144 at this time. 
 Other Information. If you have any questions concerning the Grant, please do not hesitate to contact Dennis Edge at 281/870-7342. 
 Please acknowledge receipt and acceptance of all of the aforesaid by signing both this letter and the duplicate copy enclosed and returning one of them in the pre-paid envelope provided and addressed to
the Company at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas 77079, attention of Dennis Edge, and marked “Personal and Confidential” within sixty (60) days from the date hereof. 

 
  
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	
	 
	 Stephen M. Johnson

	 President and CEO



 ACCEPTED: 
  

 
  

									
	 	 		 	Date:  	 	 	 	
	 SIGNATURE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ARIZPE,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00235-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20020D06376) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a), which states that:

At any time before the appellate court’s decision, the appellate court may

dismiss the appeal upon the appellant’s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney

must sign the written motion to dismiss and file it in duplicate with the appellate

clerk, who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.

Appellant and his attorney have filed and signed the motion to dismiss. This Court has not

issued an opinion in this cause, and the Clerk of this Court has forwarded a duplicate of this motion

to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas. As Appellant has complied with the requirements

of Rule 42.2(a), the Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s motion and concludes the motion

should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed.

We therefore dismiss the appeal.

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

October 23, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 21

- 10205 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ In Re: ROBERT L. WALKER, TAMIKO N. PEELE, Debtors.

___________________________________________________ ROBERT WALKER, TAMIKO N. PEELE, Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

versus BARRY S. MITTELBERG, BARRY S. MITTELBERG, PA, USCA11 Case: 21-10205 Date Filed: 10/25/2022 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 21

- 10205 Defendants

- Appellees.

____________________ Appeal s from the United States District Court f

or the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 9:20

- cv
- 81366

- WPD

____________________ Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: Robert Walker and Tamik o Peele, Chapter 13 debtors proceeding pro se , appeal the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting Barry Mittelberg’s motions to allow a late

- filed claim and for relief from a stay. Their notices of appeal indicate that they also seek to challenge the district court’s orders granting variou s filing extensions. After Walker and Peale filed this appeal, the bankruptcy court dismissed their Chapter 13 case. We recently dismissed their separate appeal of the district court’s denial of their motion to reconsider th at Chapter 13 case’s dismissa l

. Walker v. U.S. Bank Nat ’ l Ass ’ n

, No. 21

- 13937, 2022 WL 5237915, at *1 (11th Cir. Oct. 6, 2022). We also recently affirmed the district court’s denial of a temporary injunction against their attorneys in the bankruptcy proceeding. In re Walker , No. 21

- 12114, 2022 WL 4477259, at *1 (11th Cir. Sept. 27, 2022). USCA11 Case: 21-10205 Date Filed: 10/25/2022 Page: 2 of 321

- 10205 Opinion of the Court 3 We now deny as moot 1 Walker and Peale’s appeal of orders related to Mittelberg

— Walker’s attorney in a previous personal

- injury case. As we explained in our earlier decision , w e lack jurisdiction if a case is moot

— for example, because the dismissal of a Chapter 13 case makes it impossible to grant the prevailing party any effectual relief

. Id. at *1 (citing Neidich v. Salas , 783 F.3d 12 15, 1216 (11th Cir. 2015) )

. W e can provide relief on collateral matters , but
we can’t change the completed bankruptcy plan. Id

. Here, this appeal is moot because the district court order that Walker and Peale challenge relates to Mittelberg’s claim in th e bankruptcy plan

— it doesn’t concern a collateral matter

. To the extent any of the various grievances and requests for relief that Walker and Peele raise on appeal are collateral matters, those arguments and requests for relief are outside the scope of this appeal. 2 DISMISSED AS MOOT.

1 We review jurisdictional issues de novo and can consider jurisdiction sua sponte
. In re Donovan , 532 F.3d 1134, 1136 (11th Cir. 2008).

2 Walker and Peele also move for fees and costs and for judicial notice of related proceedings. We conclude that gra nting that relief would be in appropriate here . Accordingly, we deny those motions as moot. USCA11 Case: 21-10205 Date Filed: 10/25/2022 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit 11.1 - Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In thousands except per-share data)


                                                        Year Ended March 31
                                                  1997        1996        1995
                                                -------     -------     -------
Primary

Average shares outstanding                        2,438       2,414       2,352

Net effect of dilutive stock options
     based on the treasury stock method
     using average market price                      --          --          --
                                                -------     -------     -------

Total                                             2,438       2,414       2,352
                                                =======     =======     =======

Net loss                                        $(2,179)    $  (801)    $(1,087)
                                                =======     =======     =======

Per share amount                                $ (0.89)    $ (0.33)    $ (0.46)
                                                =======     =======     =======

Note: Fully diluted earnings per share equals primary earnings per share.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Aames Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, A. Jay Meyerson, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Jon D. Van Deuren., Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August  9, 2006  | /s/ A. JAY  MEYERSON                   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         | A. Jay Meyerson                        |
|                         | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Dated: August  9,  2006 | /s/ JON D. VAN  DEUREN                 |
|                         | Jon D. Van Deuren                      |
|                         | *Chief Financial Officer*              |

 

----
Joseph Michael GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Mary S. Pollard, North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services, Thomas K. Maher, individually and in his official capacity as executive director of the Office of Indigent Defense Services, and The State of North Carolina, Defendants.

No. COA17-490

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

DISMISSED.
Chamberlain v. Bray

39P14-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Robert S. Chamberlain, for Chamberlain, Robert S.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of June 2016 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Ervin, J. recused
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      my knowledge that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.








/s/
      MARK
      GUSTAFSON


Mark
      Gustafson


President
      (Principal Executive Officer)


June
      6,
      2006
In the MATTER OF: T.K.

No. 175P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Aaron Thomas Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, for T.K.

Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of June 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of June 2017 for Writ *528of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th of June 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1998
<CASH>                                             191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                       341
<INVENTORY>                                     21,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,388
<PP&E>                                          64,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,737
<BONDS>                                         63,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,285
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,206
<SALES>                                        159,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,968
<CGS>                                          125,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Timothy A. Bienek, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Affirmative InsuranceHoldings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004         /s/ Timothy A. Bienek     Timothy A. Bienek  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
FPA Medical Management, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-3760 and 333-2007) and
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-00076, 333-16741 and 333-15755) of our report dated
March 15, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1995, and for the year ended
December 31, 1995 and for the period from June 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Miami, Florida
April 22, 1997
STATE of North Carolina v. William Zachary HURLEY1

No. COA16-1202

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 17, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

1 Although Defendant's birth name is William Zachary Hurley, his adoptive name is William Zachary Burton. We observe that one of the judgments from which Defendant is appealing lists his last name as "Burton."

--------
# Official Journal C 386/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 386 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6423 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 386

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6423 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 386/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10423 — AEA Investors/Polygon Holding) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 386/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10423 — AEA Investors/Polygon Holding) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 386/02 | Euro exchange rates — 22 September 2021 | 2 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EEA Joint Committee |
| 2021/C 386/03 | Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee for which the constitutional requirements under Article 103 of the EEA Agreement have been fulfilled in 2020 and related Decisions | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 386/02

Euro exchange rates — 22 September 2021

2

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EEA Joint Committee

2021/C 386/03

Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee for which the constitutional requirements under Article 103 of the EEA Agreement have been fulfilled in 2020 and related Decisions

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 386/04 | Notice of Open Competitions | 31 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 386/04

Notice of Open Competitions

31

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BRYANT v. BRYANT

74P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 13, 2017

Nathaniel Bryant, for Bryant, Nathaniel.

Joseph L. Gillespie, for Gillespie, Joseph L.

Paul S. Messick, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Bryant, Charles Wilbur, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of March 2017 by Plaintiff (Nathaniel Bryant) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of March 2017."