alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56466-56467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7975-4]


Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of 
Tennessee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Tennessee is revising 
its approved Public Water System Supervision Program. Tennessee has 
adopted drinking water regulations for the Long Term 1 Surface Water 
Treatment Rule and the Arsenic Rule. EPA has determined that these 
revisions are no less stringent than the corresponding federal 
regulations. Therefore, EPA intends on approving this State program 
revision.
    All interested parties may request a public hearing. A request for 
a public hearing must be submitted by October 27, 2005 to the Regional 
Administrator at the address shown below. Frivolous or insubstantial 
requests for a hearing may be denied by the Regional Administrator. 
However, if a substantial request for a public hearing is made by 
October 27, 2005, a public hearing will be held. If no timely and 
appropriate request for a hearing is received and the Regional 
Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on his own motion, this 
determination shall become final and effective on October 27, 2005. Any 
request for a public hearing shall include the following information: 
The name, address, and telephone number of the individual, 
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; a brief statement 
of the requesting person's interest in the Regional Administrator's 
determination and a brief statement of the information that the 
requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and the signature 
of the individual making the request, or, if the request is made on 
behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of a 
responsible official of the organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available 
for inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, at the following offices: Tennessee Department of 
Environment and Conservation, Division of Water Supply, 401 Church 
Street, 6th Floor, L&C Tower, Nashville, Tennessee 37219-5404 or at the 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Drinking Water Section, 61 
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Newbold, EPA Region 4, Drinking 
Water Section at the Atlanta address given above or at telephone (404) 
562-9482.

    Authority: Section 1420 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as 
amended (1996), and 40 CFR part 142.


[[Page 56467]]


    Dated: September 14, 2005.
J.I. Palmer, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 05-19261 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The meeting will take place on Wednesday, October 26, 2005, starting at 8 a.m. at the Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, in the Bessie Coleman Conference Center, located on the 2nd floor. This will be the forty-second meeting of the COMSTAC. 

                        The proposed agenda for the meeting will feature a briefing on the role of Government launch sites for future space operations, an activities report from FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation, and reports from the Committee's working groups. An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at                         *http://ast.faa.gov/​COMSTAC*. Meetings of the COMSTAC Working Groups (Technology and Innovation, Reusable Launch Vehicle, Risk Management, and Launch Operations and Support) will be held on Tuesday, October 25, 2005. For specific information concerning the times and locations of the working group meetings, contact the contact person listed below.                     

Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should inform the contact person listed below in advance of the meeting. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brenda Parker (AST-100), Office of the Commercial Space Transportation, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-3674; e-mail                         *brenda.parker@faa.dot.gov.*

Issued in Washington, DC, September 19, 2005. 

Patricia Grace Smith, 

Associate Administrator for Commercial, Space Transportation. 

[FR Doc. 05-19291 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# Official Journal C 98/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 98 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 501 May 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 98

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 501 May 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 098/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 098/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00081-CR

EDDIE LEE WARD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On October 14, 2009, pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Eddie Lee 

Ward pleaded guilty to indecency with a child,2a second-degree felony.3 The 

trial court placed Ward on ten years’ deferred adjudication community 

supervision and imposed a fine of $1,000. Less than two months later, the State 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a) (West 2011).

3See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(d) (West 2011).
2

filed a motion to adjudicate guilt, alleging that Ward had violated the terms and 

conditions of his community supervision in various ways. The State waived one 

paragraph and Ward pleaded true to five of the six paragraphs remaining in the 

State’s petition. After the adjudication hearing, the trial court found that Ward 

had violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision, adjudicated 

his guilt, and sentenced him to fifteen years’ confinement.4

Ward’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that in 

his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion 

meet the requirements of Anders v. California5by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for 

relief. See Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

1995, no pet.). Ward has also filed a pro se response to the Anders brief.6 In 

addition, the State has filed a brief, to which Ward also filed a reply brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we 

are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if 

there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf. See Stafford v. 

 

4See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.33 (West 2011).

5

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

6Ward’s contentions include claims of actual innocence, ineffective 

assistance of counsel, and violations of due process and due course of law.
3

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 923. 

Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 

U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, the State’s brief, 

and Ward’s responses to those briefs. We agree with counsel that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might 

arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). Consequently, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the 

trial court’s judgment.

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 3, 2011
1413.

#### Wright *v.*The State.

Accusation of larceny from house, from city court of Covington —Judge Whaley. September 5, 1908.

Submitted October 27,

Decided November 10, 1908.

*A. D. Meador,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Milner, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

The evidence is circumstantial only, and is not legally sufficient to support the verdict. *Judgment reversed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4002 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4002

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revoke the charter of incorporation of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 
         at the request of that tribe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION.

    The request of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to surrender the charter 
of incorporation issued to that tribe and ratified by its members on 
June 1, 1940, pursuant to the Act of June 26, 1936 (25 U.S.C. 501 et 
seq.; commonly known as the ``Oklahoma Welfare Act''), is hereby 
accepted and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4002

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revoke the charter of incorporation of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 
         at the request of that tribe, and for other purposes.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, September 27, 2005 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-19075 Filed 9-20-05; 2:53 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
IB 

Union Calendar No. 390 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4197 

[Report No. 113–519, Part I] 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the period of certain authority with respect to judicial review of Merit Systems Protection Board 

decisions relating to whistleblowers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2014 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. FARENTHOLD, 

and Mr. CONNOLLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 

the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JULY 14, 2014 

Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

JULY 14, 2014 

The Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4197 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the period 

of certain authority with respect to judicial review of 

Merit Systems Protection Board decisions relating to 

whistleblowers, and for other purposes. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4197 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All Circuit Review Ex5 tension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION 

7 BOARD DECISIONS RELATING TO WHISTLE8 BLOWERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, 

10 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘2-year’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘5-year’’. 

12 (b) DIRECTOR REVIEW.—Section 7703(d)(2) of such 

13 title is amended by striking ‘‘2-year’’ and inserting ‘‘5- 

14 year’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 390 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4197 

[Report No. 113–519, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the 

purposes. decisions relating to whistleblowers, and for other cial review of Merit Systems Protection Board period of certain authority with respect to judiJULY 14, 2014 

Reported by the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

JULY 14, 2014 

The Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed 

the Union and ordered to be printed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHITBIT 10.19


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO CONSENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into this 21st day of November, 2013 by and among SAFETY QUICK
LIGHTING & FANS CORP. (f/k/a Safety Quick Light LLC), a Florida corporation (“Borrower”), PATRICIA BARRON, an individual
(“Barron”), RAN ROLAND KOHEN (a/k/a Rani Roland Kohen) (“Kohen” together with Barron hereinafter collectively
referred to as “Guarantor”) and SIGNATURE BANK OF GEORGIA (“Lender”).


 


WHEREAS, on November
14, 2013 the parties executed a Consent Agreement (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS the parties
desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


A. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement
is deleted in its entirety and amended to read as follows:


 


4.Loan Payment
and Lender Expenses. The effectiveness of the Lender’s consents contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be conditioned
upon Lender receiving $82,500, in good funds, on or before 3 p.m. Eastern November 25, 2013. Of said amount, $2,500 shall be used
by Lender to pay Lender’s counsel for the attorney fees incurred in connection with the drafting and preparation of this
Agreement and the remaining $80,000 shall be applied by Lender as a payment under the Note which shall be applied equally to the
next eight monthly installments which are due immediately after the date hereof and such monthly payments shall be reduced by such
amount.


 


Except as otherwise provided herein
the Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


 


[the balance of this page is intentionally
left blank]


 


 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


 


BORROWER:


 


Safety Quick Lighting
& Fans Corp. (f/k/a Safety Quick Light LLC)


 


By:/s/
James R. Hills


Name:James
R. Hills


Title:CEO


 


[CORPORATE
SEAL]


 


 


 


GUARANTOR:


 


 


/s/ Patricia Barron
(SEAL)


Patricia Barron


 


 


/s/ Ran Roland
Kohen (SEAL)


Ran Roland Kohen (a/k/a Rani
Roland Kohen)


 


 


 


LENDER:


 


Signature Bank of Georgia


 


By:/s/
Freddie J. Deutsch


Name:Freddie
J. Deutsch


Title:CEO/President
ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES, INC. v. TOWN OF COLUMBUS

334PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 23, 2017

Ryan D. Bolick, Attorney at Law, Virginia M. Wooten, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Town of Columbus, North Carolina.

Benjamin R. Sullivan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of March 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of March 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 18th day of April 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 10 04

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Bryan S. Beh ren s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof Ne br as ka - Om ah a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Sep te m

be r 2, 2 01 4 Fil ed : Se pt em

be r 5, 2 01 4 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, GRUENDER, andSHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Bryan Beh ren s, who se se nt en ce on a se cu rit ie s- frau d co nv ic ti on we affi rm ed , se e Uni te d St at es v. Beh ren s, 71 3 F.3 d 92 6, 92 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ), ap pe al s th e di st ric tco ur t’s or de r de nyin g 28 U.S.C. § 22 55 rel ie f wit ho ut an ev id en ti ary he ari ng

. In hi s 1

m ot io n, Behr en s clai m ed hi s crim in al co nv ic ti on was vo id ba se d on an al le ge d lack of su bjec t m at te r juri sd ic ti on in li gh t of an ord er ent ered in a pr io r ci vi l pr oc eed in g. He al so cl ai m ed hi s co un se l was in effe ct iv e fo r fai li ng to rai se th e is su e. Bec au se Beh ren ’s su bjec t-matte r-ju r i s di ct io n an d rel at ed in effe ct iv e-as si st an ce cl ai m s are
m eri tl es s, se e Uni te d St at es v. Whi te Hor se , 31 6 F.3 d 76 9, 77 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (s ub ject m at te r juri sd ic ti on es tabl is he d b y 18 U.S.C. § 32 31 ); Ro dr ig ue z v. Uni te d St at es , 17 F.3 d 2 2 5 , 2 2 6 ( 8 th Ci r. 19 94 ) (p er cu ria m ) (co un se l’s fai lu re to ad va nc e
m eri tl es s ar gu m en t ca nn ot co ns ti tu te in effe ct iv e as si st an ce), we af fir m

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ly le E. St ro m , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of 1 Neb ras ka

. -2

-
_________________________________________ 

 

__________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

134328(60) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

KENNETH SCIOTTI,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 134328 

v COA: 266160 

Wayne CC: 03-327602-CD

36th DISTRICT COURT,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant.
 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension to 

September 26, 2008 of the time for filing his brief on appeal is considered and it is 

GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2010024EN.01005102.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/51

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 November 2009 — IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants v Commission

(Case T-41/07) (1)

1

(Project Ecodata - Commission Decision in preparation of the forced execution of a claim due pursuant to an earlier decision - Action deprived of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 24/90

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Pitschas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Arhold, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for the annulment of Commission Decision C (2006) 6452 of 4 December 2006 on the recovery of advance payments in the amount of EUR 318 000 made to IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH for the project Ecodata pursuant to the decision to grant financial assistance of 4 August 1992, prior to the Commission’s decision of 13 May 2005 to annul the financial assistance.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer a need to give a ruling on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer a need to give a ruling on the action.

| 2. | IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH and the European Commission each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH and the European Commission each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 14.4.2007

1

---