alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4190 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 

under the Medicare program of pharmacist services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2014 

Mr. GUTHRIE (for himself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for coverage under the Medicare program of pharmacist 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF PHARMACIST SERV4 ICES. 

5 (a) COVERAGE.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara8 graph (EE); 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4190 IH

1 (2) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara2 graph (FF); and 

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (FF) the 

4 following new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(GG) pharmacist services furnished by a 

6 pharmacist, as licensed by State law, individ7 ually or on behalf of a pharmacy provider— 

8 ‘‘(i) which the pharmacist is legally 

9 authorized to perform in the State in 

10 which the individual performs such serv11 ices; 

12 ‘‘(ii) as would otherwise be covered 

13 under this part if furnished by a physician, 

14 or as an incident to a physician’s service; 

15 and 

16 ‘‘(iii) in a setting located in a health 

17 professional shortage area (as defined in 

18 section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health 

19 Service Act), medically underserved area, 

20 or medically underserved population (as 

21 defined in section 330(b)(3) of such Act);’’. 

22 (b) PAYMENT.—Section 1833(a)(1) of the Social Se23 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)) is amended— 

24 (1) by striking ‘‘and (Z)’’ and inserting ‘‘(Z)’’; 

25 and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4190 IH

1 (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end 

2 the following: ‘‘(AA) with respect to pharmacist 

3 services (as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(GG)), the 

4 amounts paid shall be equal to 80 percent of the 

5 lesser of the actual charge or 85 percent of the fee 

6 schedule amount provided under section 1848 if 

7 such services had been furnished by a physician’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE; PHARMACIST SPECIFIC

9 CODES.— 

10 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

11 by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply with respect 

12 to services furnished on or after January 1, 2015. 

13 (2) PHARMACIST SPECIFIC CODES.—The Sec14 retary of Health and Human Services shall develop 

15 pharmacist specific codes, as necessary, under the 

16 physician fee schedule under section 1848 of the So17 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 30, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-14631

 

D.C. Docket No. 03-00083-CR-CDL-5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR., 

a.k.a. Miles Garey,

a.k.a. Milton Garey,

a.k.a. Eddie Garey,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------------

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Georgia

--------------------------

(September 30, 2008)

BEFORE: EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH,

DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and

PRYOR, Judges. 

BY THE COURT: 

The en banc Court having issued its opinion in this appeal, addressing the

issue of Appellant's waiver of counsel, Appellant's sentencing issues are remanded

back to the panel for resolution.

The mandate shall not issue until the sentencing issues are resolved by the

panel.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Stanley BROWN, Jr.

No. 205P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Mr. Luther D. Starling, Jr., Mr. William Joel Starling, Jr., Attorneys at Law, For Brown, Robert Stanley (Jr.)

Ms. Lauren M. Clemmons, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina *239***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant-Appellant on the 24th of May 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the @appellee, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of May 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of change in meeting date and location.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest's Madison-Beaverhead Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. in Dillon, Montana, for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Tuesday, November 15, 2005.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center in Dillon, Montana.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas W. Heintz, Designated Forest Official (DFO), Forest Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, at (406) 683-3937.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics for this meeting includes electing a chair, hearing and deciding on proposals for projects to fund under Title II of Public Law 106-393, hearing public comments, and other business. If the meeting location changes, notice will be posted in local newspapers, including the Dillon Tribune and The Montana Standard.

Dated: September 23, 2005.

Thomas W. Heintz,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05-19435  Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Order issued July 25, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

________________________________________
No. 05-12-01246-CR

________________________________________ ALEXANDER JAMES GABRIEL, Appellant



### V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



### O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the April 10, 2014 motion of

Samuel D. Rosenstein for leave to withdr aw as appointed couns el on appeal. We DIRECT the

Clerk of the Court to remove Samuel D. Rosenste in as counsel of record for appellant. We

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to

Alexander James Gabriel, TDCJ No. 1810443, Bartle tt State Jail, 1018 Arnold Drive, Bartlett,

Texas, 76511.

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132042 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 132042 COA: 247391 Jackson CC: 02-002915-FC KATHERINE SUE DENDEL, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoi d submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

p0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2007

Clerk
TULLY v. CITY OF WILMINGTON

348A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2017

Katie Weaver Hartzog, Attorney at Law, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Dan Hartzog, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Wilmington.

S. Luke Largess, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cheyenne Chambers, Attorney at Law, for Tully, Kevin J.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Professional Fire Fighters and Paramedics of North Carolina.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

Robert M. Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association, et al.

Fred Baggett, Attorney at Law, Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of February 2017 by North Carolina Sheriffs' Association, North Carolina Association of Chiefs of Police, North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, and North Carolina League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2017."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4091 

To authorize Members of Congress to bring an action for declaratory and 

injunctive relief in response to a written statement by the President 

or any other official in the executive branch directing officials of the 

executive branch to not enforce a provision of law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2014 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize Members of Congress to bring an action for 

declaratory and injunctive relief in response to a written 

statement by the President or any other official in the 

executive branch directing officials of the executive 

branch to not enforce a provision of law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Constitutional Check 

5 and Balance Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4091 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING CAUSE OF ACTION BY MEMBERS OF 

2 CONGRESS IN RESPONSE TO WRITTEN STATE3 MENT BY THE PRESIDENT OR OTHER EXECU4 TIVE BRANCH OFFICIAL DIRECTING EXECU5 TIVE BRANCH OFFICIALS TO NOT ENFORCE A 

6 LAW. 

7 (a) CAUSE OF ACTION AUTHORIZED.—If the Presi8 dent or any other official in the executive branch issues 

9 a memorandum or other written statement directing any 

10 official in the executive branch to not enforce a provision 

11 of law, a Member of Congress who meets the criteria de12 scribed in subsection (b) may bring an action for declara13 tory or injunctive relief in an appropriate United States 

14 district court to compel such official to enforce that provi15 sion of law. 

16 (b) CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY.—A Member of Con17 gress meets the criteria described in this subsection with 

18 respect to a provision of law if the Member cast a recorded 

19 vote on final passage of the version of the bill or joint 

20 resolution which was enacted into law and included that 

21 provision. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1588

KEVIN ROBERTSON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

PETER V.R. FRANCHOT; JAMES T. LOFTUS, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District 

Judge. (1:07-cv-03042-BEL) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian L. Oliner, Michael 

Joseph Salem, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, 

Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s marginal 

order, entered on April 24, 2009, denying his motion to 

reconsider the dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed 

the record and find the district did not abuse its discretion in 

denying Robertson’s motion to reconsider. See Boryan v. United 

States, 884 F.2d 767, 771 (4th Cir. 1989) (providing review 

standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2
  Certification
Pursuant to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WCA Waste Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Charles A. Casalinova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 /s/ Charles
      A. CasalinovaCharles
      A. CasalinovaChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      8, 2008
   The
foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1505

VERSUS

JEREMY GRINER FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: Jeremy Griner, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 

35, 185. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. Relator failed to meet his burden of proving

that relief should be granted. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 2. 

VGW

AHP

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

p /

11' ;

Ai

u 

DEPU

t 1

Y

a

CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
**Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2011 – Caixa Geral de Depósitos v Commission**

**(Case T-401/07)**

ERDF – Reduction of financial assistance – Global grant for local development in Portugal – Action for annulment – Whether directly concerned – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned
– Criteria – Commission decision, addressed to a Member State, reducing financial aid from the European Regional Development
Fund – Decision not requiring recovery of the sums paid from the final beneficiaries – No discretion of the Member State as
to recovery of the said amounts arising under national law – Action brought by the organisation entrusted with management
of the said aid – Not directly concerned – Inadmissibility (Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 61-90)*

2.                     *Procedure – Referral to the General Court under an arbitration clause – Jurisdiction of the General Court defined by the arbitration
clause – Jurisdiction in derogation from ordinary law – Restrictive interpretation – Application for payment of the balance
of Community financial assistance – Application outside the scope of the arbitration clause – Lack of jurisdiction of the
General Court (Art. 238 EC) (see paras 99-102)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 3772 of 31 July 2007 reducing the financial assistance granted by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the global grant for local development in Portugal by Commission Decision C(95) 1769 of the European Commission of 28 July 1995, and a claim for an order against the Commission to pay the final balance of the financial assistance under Article 238 EC. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the Republic of Portugal to bear its own costs. |
The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. N.C. Department of Revenue

307P15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 25, 2016

Peggy S. Vincent, Assistant Attorney General, Tenisha S. Jacobs, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Revenue.

Thomas D. Myrick, Attorney at Law, Neil T. Bloomfield, Attorney at Law, Kara N. Bitar, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of July 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of July 2016."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-31187

ARTHUR H MEYERS, JR; LENA M MEYERS

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

PROCTOR & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN, erroneously sued as

Proctor & Gamble Disability Plan

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:05-CV-4135

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 15, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Christopher BUCKNER, Employee v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier

No. 211P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Christopher Buckner, for Buckner, Christopher.

Jennifer Jerzak Blackman, Attorney at Law, for United Parcel Service, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd of June 2017 in *623this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of June 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. McClure, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(3) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: November 9, 2009



/s/ Michael J. McClureMichael J. McClureExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ending **December 31, 2017**, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), **I**, **Ryan L. MacWilliam, Chief Financial Officer**of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | **April 19, 2018** |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | ***“RyanL. MacWilliam”***                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | *__________________________***Ryan L. MacWilliam****Chief Financial Officer** |

----