alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Sew Cal Logo, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,2007, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
      Songer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,2007, 2007 complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending May 31,2007,2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Sew Cal Logo, Inc.




Dated:
      July 16, 2007




**SEW
      CAL LOGO, INC.**





By:
                /s/ Richard Songer
              Chief
                Executive Officer
# C_2008327EN.01002602.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 18 March 2008 — Aer Lingus Group v Commission

(Case T-411/07 R)

(Interim measures - Control of concentrations - Decision declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market - Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Application for suspension of operation and for interim relief - Measure incompatible with the distribution of powers between institutions - Powers of the Commission - Interim measures addressed to an intervener - Application for suspension of operation - Admissibility - No prima facie case - Lack of urgency - Absence of serious and irreparable damage - Damage dependent on future, uncertain events - Insufficient reasons - Weighing of all the interests involved)

prima facie

(2008/C 327/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aer Lingus Group plc (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. Burnside, Solicitor, and B. van de Walle de Ghelcke and T. Snels, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis, É. Gippini Fournier and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Ryanair Holdings plc (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: J. Swift, QC, V. Power, A. McCarthy and D. Hull, Solicitors, and G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, first, an order requiring the Commission to adopt certain measures concerning Ryanair Holdings plc's shareholding in the applicant, second, alternatively, any order to similar effect against the Commission or Ryanair Holdings plc, and, third, suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 4600 final of 11 October 2007 rejecting the applicant's request that proceedings be opened under Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1) and that interim measures be adopted under Article 8(5) of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2008092EN.01004901.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/49

---

Action brought on 10 December 2007 — Van Arum v Parliament

(Case F-139/07)

(2008/C 92/99)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Rinse Van Arum (Winksele, Belgium) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

(i) The applicant seeks alteration of his Staff Report and, alternatively, its annulment. As a further alternative, the applicant seeks an order that all evidence supporting certain contested remarks in his Staff Report be disclosed to him and that the Tribunal rule on the contested facts and marking. (ii) The applicant seeks an order that the appointing authority pay to him a token sum of one euro in compensation.

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the Staff Report; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the Staff Report;

| — | Alternatively, annul the report in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively, annul the report in its entirety;

| — | As a further alternative, order that all evidence supporting certain contested remarks in the Staff Report be disclosed to the applicant and rule on the contested facts and marking; |
| --- | --- |

—

As a further alternative, order that all evidence supporting certain contested remarks in the Staff Report be disclosed to the applicant and rule on the contested facts and marking;

| — | Order the appointing authority to pay to him a token sum of one euro in compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the appointing authority to pay to him a token sum of one euro in compensation;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Fred M. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

|  | (3) | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (4)    | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ FRED M. POWELLFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
May 12, 2006
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D13-3016

[November 18, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-

008020CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nicholas I. Igwe, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Blackmon v. State, 121 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 2013), Allwine v. 

State, 978 So. 2d 272, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Gao, Chief Executive Officer of BMP SUNSTONE Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID GAO          
|David Gao              
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2010
NO. 12-08-00327-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DEMETRIO LEZANDRO SELMAN, § APPEAL FROM THE 

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant attempts to appeal his conviction for hazing. See TEX.EDUC.CODE ANN.§ 37.152

(Vernon 2006). However, the trial court’s certification states that “the defendant has waived the

right to appeal, as part of agreed punishment.” See TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The certification

is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and his counsel.

A defendant in a noncapital case may waive any rights secured him by law. TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.14 (Vernon 2005). A defendant who bargains for a sentencing

recommendation in exchange for his waiver of the right to appeal will be held to that bargain.

Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Even in the absence of a plea bargain

agreement, a waiver of the right to appeal that is freely and voluntarily made is binding upon the

appellant. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App.2003). The trial court's

permission is required before a defendant may appeal after waiving his right to appeal. Blanco, 18

S.W.3d at 220.

In this case, Appellant and the State reached an agreement on punishment, which was

announced in open court and presented as “a new agreed offer.” The State’s attorney informed the

trial court that as part of the agreement, Appellant waived his right to appeal. The court then asked

Appellant and his counsel whether the plea agreement presented by the State’s attorney correctly
2

stated their agreement, and both said that it did. The trial court accepted the agreement, sentenced

Appellant in accordance with the agreement, and stated that “there will be no appeal. That’s

waived.” He then asked whether there was anything else from either party, to which neither

Appellant nor his attorney replied. Nothing in the record indicates that the trial court has granted

Appellant permission to appeal. Therefore, we conclude that the record supports the trial court’s

certification. See Greenwell v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 JAMES T. WORTHEN 

 Chief Justice

Opinion delivered October 8, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
# Official Journal C 194A/30 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4730 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4730 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Council |
| 2004/C 194A/1 | Notice of vacancies — European Defence Agency — Directors | 1 |
| | European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia |
| 2004/C 194A/2 | Call for applications HOUA-A-2004 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Council

2004/C 194A/1

Notice of vacancies — European Defence Agency — Directors

1

European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia

2004/C 194A/2

Call for applications HOUA-A-2004

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NO. 07-09-0156-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 29, 2009

		______________________________

	SPENCER SOSEBEE, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2003-403,610; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pending before the Court is appellant's motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							James T. Campbell

							         Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





Solely for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  I, the

undersigned  Chief  Financial  Officer of Sew Cal Logo,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),

hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB

of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 (the "Report"):



1. Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934: and



2.  That  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all

material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the

Company.





/s/ Judy Songer

-----------------------------------

Judy Songer

Chief Financial Officer

July 15, 2005
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Stern, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|May 31, 2007 |  | /S/ DANNY STERN
Danny SternChief Executive Officer
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
# C_2009044EN.01007102.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/71

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — Traore v Commission

(Case F-90/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Vacancy notice - Rejection of the applicant's candidature - Reassignment - Interest of the service)

(2009/C 44/124)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Amadou Traore (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decisions rejecting the applicant's candidature for the post of chargé d'affaires ad interim at the Commission Delegation in Togo and for the post of Head of Operations at the Commission Delegation in Tanzania — Annulment of the Commission decisions appointing other candidates to those posts — Claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Director of Resources of the EuropeAid Co-operation Office of the Commission of the European Communities of 12 December 2006 rejecting Mr Traore's candidature for the post of Head of Operations at the Commission Delegation in Tanzania and the decision to appoint Mr S to that post; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Director of Resources of the EuropeAid Co-operation Office of the Commission of the European Communities of 12 December 2006 rejecting Mr Traore's candidature for the post of Head of Operations at the Commission Delegation in Tanzania and the decision to appoint Mr S to that post;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders Mr Traore to bear half his own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Traore to bear half his own costs;

| 4. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay half of Mr Traore's costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay half of Mr Traore's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269 of 10.11.2007, p. 72.

1

---
NO. 12-08-00408-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TIMOTHY J. BAKER, § APPEAL FROM THE 188TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Timothy Joseph Baker, pleaded guilty, with an agreed punishment

recommendation from the State, to the offense of murder. Appellant signed written plea

admonishments, an agreement to stipulate to evidence, and a judicial confession. The written plea

admonishments included the following:

4. Permission to Appeal: If the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by you and your attorney the Court must give its

permission to you before you can prosecute an appeal on any matter in the case except for matters

raised by writing [sic] motion filed prior to trial.

Appellant and his counsel also signed a plea bargain agreement, which included an agreed

punishment recommendation. The trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for thirty-five

years, and certified that this “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO RIGHT OF

APPEAL[.]” The trial court’s certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant’s

counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) limits a defendant’s right to appeal in a plea

bargain case when he pleads guilty and his punishment does not exceed the punishment

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 
Under the terms of the plea bargain agreement, Appellant expressly “waive[d] the right and [gave] up the time

1

provided in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to file a motion for new trial, motion for arrest of judgment or notice

of appeal.” 

2

Under those circumstances, the defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by written motion and

ruled on before trial or (2) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Id. Here, the trial

court sentenced Appellant in accordance with the agreed punishment recommendation. The trial

court did not give Appellant permission to appeal, and all pretrial motions were agreed upon by the

parties. Therefore, we conclude that the certification of the right of appeal filed by the trial court is

supported by the record and that Appellant has no right to appeal because he was sentenced pursuant

to the agreed terms of a plea bargain and did not satisfy either of the exceptions stated in Rule

25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal “without further action.” See Chavez v. State, 183 1

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Opinion delivered October 22, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
# Official Journal L 5/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.005.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 5 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 538 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.005.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 5

English edition

Legislation

Volume 538 January 2010

---

| Contents | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2010/3/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 on State aid C 19/05 (ex N 203/05) granted by Poland to Stocznia Szczecińska
  (notified under document C(2008) 6770)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

page

2010/3/EC

*

Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 on State aid C 19/05 (ex N 203/05) granted by Poland to Stocznia Szczecińska
  (notified under document C(2008) 6770)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2008) 6770)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ADESA, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric M. Loughmiller, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)             the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Eric M. Loughmiller                              |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Eric   M. Loughmiller                                  |   |
| *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Date:   April 20, 2012                            |   |

 

----