alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COOPER v. BERGER, et al.

52PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2017

D. Martin Warf, Attorney at Law, Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Candace S. Friel, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Berger, Philip E.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Daniel F.E. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cooper, Roy A. (III).

Grayson Kelley, Chief Deputy.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Kevin Crandall, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Hunt, James B., Jr., et al.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, et al.

Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, Anita S. Earls, Attorney at Law, Emily E. Seawell, Attorney at Law, for County Board Members.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2017 by State of NC to Amend State's Response to the Court's 17 August 2017 Order:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2017."
# C_2010024EN.01007203.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/72

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Behmer v Parliament

(Case F-124/07) (1)

1

(Promotion - 2006 promotion exercise - Comparative examination of the merits)

2010/C 24/132

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and R. Ignătescu, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment, first, of the decision of the Appointing Authority of the Parliament to allocate two promotion points to the applicant for 2005 and, second, of the decision to not promote the applicant to grade AD 13 for the 2006 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008, p. 56.

1

---
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Sew Cal Logo, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending, November30,2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Judy Songer,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30,2007, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending November 30, 2007fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Sew Cal Logo, Inc.




Dated:
      January 11, 2008




**SEW
      CAL LOGO, INC.**




By:
            /s/
                Judy SongerChief
                  Financial Officer,
Brian BLUE v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INC., Mountaire Farms of North Carolina Corp., Mountaire Farms, LLC, Charles Branton, Daniel Pate, James Lanier, Robert Garroutte, a/k/a Robert Garroutte, Jr., Christopher Smith, Halley Ondona, Thomas Saufley, Detra Swain, as Executrix of the Estate of Clifton Swain, the Estate of Clifton Swain, and Bradford Scott Hancox, Public Administrator of Cumberland County, North Carolina, and as Successor or substitute Personal Representative and/or Administrator and/or Collector of the Estate of Clifton Swain

No. 212P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017.

Lisa Kaminski Shortt, Attorney at Law, Lisa W. Arthur, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Mountaire Farms, Inc., et al.

*10Paul D. Coates, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Jon Ward, Attorney at Law, Adam Gregory Linett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Blue, Brian.

Adam L. White, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of June 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4192 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the height 

of buildings in the District of Columbia’’ to clarify the 

rules of the District of Columbia regarding human occupancy of penthouses above the top story of the building 

upon which the penthouse is placed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4192 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF RULES APPLYING TO 

2 HUMAN OCCUPANCY OF PENTHOUSES IN DIS3 TRICT OF COLUMBIA BUILDINGS. 

4 (a) PERMITTING HUMAN OCCUPANCY OF PENT5 HOUSES WITHIN CERTAIN HEIGHT LIMIT.—The eighth 

6 paragraph of section 5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regu7 late the height of buildings in the District of Columbia’’, 

8 approved June 1, 1910 (sec. 6–601.05(h), D.C. Official 

9 Code) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘penthouses over elevator 

11 shafts,’’ and inserting ‘‘penthouses,’’; and 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘and no floor or compartment 

13 thereof shall be constructed or used for human occu14 pancy above the top story of the building upon which 

15 such structures are placed’’ and inserting ‘‘and, ex16 cept in the case of a penthouse which is erected to 

17 a height of one story of 20 feet or less above the 

18 level of the roof, no floor or compartment thereof 

19 shall be constructed or used for human occupancy 

20 above the top story of the building upon which such 

21 structures are placed’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4192 RDS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact3 ment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the advice of the board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between NPS and the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). The board examines the effectiveness with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical equipment; administration; state of morale of the student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to the operation of the NPS as the board considers pertinent. This meeting will be open to the public. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Wednesday, October 19, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. All written comments regarding the NPS BOA should be received by October 7, 2005, and be directed to President, Naval Postgraduate School (Attn: Jaye Panza), 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5000 or by fax 831-656-3145. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Navy Memorial and Naval Heritage Center, President's Room, 701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 93943-5000, telephone number 831-656-2514. 

Dated: September 13, 2005. 

I.C. Le Moyne Jr., 

Lieutenant, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-18902 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. LAMONT HARVEY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 130 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MICHAELJ. 

### SINDRAM, ) ) 

### Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) 

### v. ) ) 

### SUPERIORCOURTDISTRICTOF )**COLUMm~** 

### ) ) 

### Defendant/Appellee. ) Civil Case No. 10-1397 (RJL)

MEMORANDUM ORDER Michael Joseph Sindram ("Sindram"),

### prose, has filed numerous appeals in this Court from Orders entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District ofColumbia in proceedings against Jamison Condominium Association, Chase Home Finance, LLC, Gustavo F. Velasquez, the Superior Court ofthe District ofColumbia, and the U.S. Marshal Service. On August 6, 2010, this Court issued a Memorandum Order (the "August 6, 2010 Memorandum Order") dismissing with prejudice Civil Case Nos. 09- 2356, 10-31, 10-134, 10-402, 10-814, 10-1084, and 10-1246. The August 6,2010 Memorandum Order also enjoined Sindram from filing any new matters in the U.S. District Court for the District ofColumbiawithout seeking leave to file from the Chief Judge ofthis Court under certain procedures outlined in the Memorandum Order and obtaining the ChiefJudge's approval. OnAugust 19,2010, Sindram filed a notice ofappeal from the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District ofColumbiato this Courtthat was docketed as the above-captioned
case. On August 23, 2010, Sindram filed a motion seeking recusal ofmyselfand immediate reinstatement ofall seven civil cases that were dismissed withprejudice in the August 6, 2010 Memorandum Order. The motion for recusal asserts that this Court has "deliberately appoint[ed] himself' to Sindram's cases "to abrogate Debtor/ Apellant's constitutionally-guaranteedrights." Pl.'s Mot. 1 [#4]. Sindram has failed to marshal even
a scintilla offactual or legal support for his motion, and it is clear that his accusations are, yet again, wholly without merit. Furthermore, he failed to seek and obtain leave to file this matter in violation ofthe August 6,2010 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, it is this 

# ?2t**d~ePtember,** 2010, hereby ORDEREDthat Sindram's Motion for Recusal and Immediate Reinstatement of Bankruptcy Matters [#4] be DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Sindram be enjoined from submitting any additional filings in the above-captioned matter; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it is further ORDERED that this matter be referred to the ChiefJudge ofthe District of Columbia for possible contempt, perthis Court's August 6,2010 Memorandum Order. 

### SO ORDERED.

United States
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Stern, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|April 8, 2008 |  | /s/ DANNY STERN
Danny SternChief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Exhibit
23.3





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our reports dated March 18, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, schedule and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Cenveo, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in Registration Statement Nos.
333-153447, 333-61467, 333-118861, 333-74490 and 333-26743 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement Nos. 333-74065, 333-39013 and 333-36337 on Form
S-3.





/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville,
New York


March 18,
2009
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 413 

To eliminate the 2-year delay in including oral-only ESRD-related drugs 

in the Medicare ESRD prospective payment system, as provided under 

section 632(b)(1) of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. HANNA, Mr. COOPER, and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To eliminate the 2-year delay in including oral-only ESRDrelated drugs in the Medicare ESRD prospective payment system, as provided under section 632(b)(1) of 

the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 413 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATING THE 2-YEAR DELAY IN IMPLE2 MENTATION OF ORAL-ONLY ESRD-RELATED 

3 DRUGS IN THE MEDICARE ESRD PROSPEC4 TIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM. 

5 Section 632(b) of the American Taxpayer Relief Act 

6 of 2012 (Public Law 112–240) is amended by striking all 

7 that precedes ‘‘With respect to the implementation’’ and 

8 inserting the following:: 

9 ‘‘(b) MONITORING OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ORAL10 ONLY ESRD-RELATED DRUGS IN THE ESRD PROSPEC11 TIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM.—With respect to the implemen12 tation’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
State of North Carolina, v. William Creamont Beary, Defendant.

No. COA16-433

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

NO ERROR.
Tully v. City of Wilmington

348A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 17, 2017

Katie Weaver Hartzog, Attorney at Law, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Wilmington.

S. Luke Largess, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cheyenne Chambers, Attorney at Law, for Tully, Kevin J.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Professional Fire Fighters and Paramedics of North Carolina.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police

Robert M. Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of January 2017 by Southern States Police Benevolent Association *806and North Carolina Police Benevolent Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of January 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
# C_2008116EN.01003202.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/32

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 6 March 2008 — R bis v Commission

(Case F-105/07)

(Staff cases - Officials - Actions - Action for damages - Conditions under which the probationary period progressed - Extension of probationary period - Establishment as an official - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2008/C 116/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: R bis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Martins, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 13 February 2007 rejecting the applicant's complaint and claim concerning the compensation for the damage that the applicant suffered as a result of the wrongful conduct of the Commission, in particular in connection with the applicant's probationary period — Claim for damages

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 529 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4296 

[Report No. 113–698, Part I] 

To amend Public Law 94–241 with respect to the Northern Mariana Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

DECEMBER 22, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources with an amendment 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

DECEMBER 22, 2014 

The Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 25, 2014] 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4296 RH

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 94–241 with respect to the Northern 

Mariana Islands. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4296 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 Section 6 of Public Law 94–241 (90 Stat. 263; 122 

5 Stat. 854) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘December 

7 31, 2014, except as provided in subsections (b) and 

8 (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2019’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (d)— 

10 (A) in the third sentence of paragraph (2), 

11 by striking ‘‘not to extend beyond December 31, 

12 2014, unless extended pursuant to paragraph 5 

13 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘ending on De14 cember 31, 2019’’; 

15 (B) by striking paragraph (5); and 

16 (C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

17 paragraph (5). 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 529 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4296 

[Report No. 113–698, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 94–241 with respect to the 

Northern Mariana Islands. 

DECEMBER 22, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources with 

an amendment 

DECEMBER 22, 2014 

The Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed 

the Union and ordered to be printed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS