alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4192 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the height of buildings 

in the District of Columbia’’ to clarify the rules of the District of 

Columbia regarding human occupancy of penthouses above the top story 

of the building upon which the penthouse is placed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2014 

Mr. ISSA (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the height 

of buildings in the District of Columbia’’ to clarify the 

rules of the District of Columbia regarding human occupancy of penthouses above the top story of the building 

upon which the penthouse is placed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF RULES APPLYING TO 

4 HUMAN OCCUPANCY OF PENTHOUSES IN DIS5 TRICT OF COLUMBIA BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) PERMITTING HUMAN OCCUPANCY OF PENT7 HOUSES WITHIN CERTAIN HEIGHT LIMIT.—The eighth 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4192 IH

1 paragraph of section 5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regu2 late the height of buildings in the District of Columbia’’, 

3 approved June 1, 1910 (sec. 6–601.05(h), D.C. Official 

4 Code) is amended by striking ‘‘and no floor or compart5 ment thereof shall be constructed or used for human occu6 pancy above the top story of the building upon which such 

7 structures are placed’’ and inserting ‘‘and, except in the 

8 case of a penthouse which is erected to a height of one 

9 story of 20 feet or less above the level of the roof, no floor 

10 or compartment thereof shall be constructed or used for 

11 human occupancy above the top story of the building upon 

12 which such structures are placed’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact15 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Isaiah Leffand, Doing Business as Century Restaurant Equipment Company, Appellant, *v.*Sam Schwartz, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 11, 1943.

*710
      *Louis I. Fabricant*for appellant.

*Raphael E. Rhodes*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The determination of the court below on the motion to dismiss the complaint constituted the law of the case which should have been followed in the subsequent decision on the motion to strike out the defenses. It does not constitute the law of the case insofar as this court is concerned and does not preclude the court from considering the merits in reviewing the case. *(Walker*v. *Gerli,*257 App. Div, 249.) The defenses are insufficient.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

Hammer, Shieutaq and Hecht, JJ., concur.
In the MATTER OF: G.G.R.

No. COA16-898

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1694/2006

of 16 November 2006         

fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Export refunds as provided for in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 shall be granted on the products and for the amounts set out in the Annex to this Regulation subject to the conditions provided for in Article 1(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 (4).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 218, 6.8.1998, p. 46.

(3)OJ L 218, 6.8.1998, p. 45.

(4)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on milk and milk products applicable from 17 November 2006

----

(1)  As for the relevant products intended for exports to Dominican Republic under the quota 2006/2007 referred to in the Decision 98/486/EC, and complying with the conditions laid down in Article 20a of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, the following rates should apply:

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM ABBOTT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 529 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-121393, No. 333-110581, and No. 333-114760 and Forms S-8 No. 033-79720, No. 033-79722, No. 033-94768, No. 333-05613, No. 333-05615 and No. 333-109767) of Point Therapeutics, Inc. and in therelated Prospectus of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Point Therapeutics, Inc., Point Therapeutics, Inc.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Point Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston,Massachusetts 

March 12, 2007
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4258 

To reauthorize and update certain provisions of the Secure Water Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2014 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself, Ms. GABBARD, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. COSTA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, 

Mr. RUIZ, Mr. SIRES, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Ms. HAHN, Mr. PASTOR

of Arizona, Mr. DOGGETT, and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize and update certain provisions of the Secure 

Water Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SECURE Water 

5 Amendments Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4258 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES; ELIGIBILITY; AUTHOR2 IZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9504 of the Omnibus 

4 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (42 U.S.C. 10364) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)(H)— 

8 (i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

9 the end; 

10 (ii) in clause (ii), by striking the pe11 riod and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

12 (iii) by adding at the end the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(iii) to plan for or address the im15 pacts of drought.’’; and 

16 (B) in paragraph (2)(A)— 

17 (i) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘; or’’; 

19 (ii) by striking ‘‘(A) be located within 

20 the States’’ and inserting the following: 

21 ‘‘(A) be located in— 

22 ‘‘(i) the States’’; and 

23 (iii) by adding at the end the fol24 lowing: 

25 ‘‘(ii) the State of Hawaii; and’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4258 IH

1 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘There is’’ 

2 and all that follows through ‘‘$200,000,000’’ and in3 serting ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated 

4 such sums as are necessary to carry out this section 

5 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NA7 TIONAL WATER AVAILABILITY AND USE AS8 SESSMENT PROGRAM. 

9 Section 9508(e)(2) of the Omnibus Public Land Man10 agement Act of 2009 (42 U.S.C. 10368(e)(2)) is amended 

11 by striking ‘‘$12,500,000 for the period of fiscal years 

12 2009 through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘such sums as are nec13 essary for the period of fiscal years 2014 through 2023’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009141EN.01003903.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 April 2009 — Sanchez Ferriz and Others v Commission

(Case T-492/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff Cases - Officials - Promotion - 2005 promotion year - Non-inclusion on the list of promoted officials - Multiplication rates for guidance purposes - Articles 6 and 10 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Legal interest in raising a plea)

2009/C 141/81

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Carlos Sanchez Ferriz (Brussels, Belgium) and the nine other officials of the Commission of the European Communities whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 October 2007 in Case F-115/06 Sanchez Ferriz and Others v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking annulment of that order.

Sanchez Ferriz and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Carlos Sanchez Ferriz and the nine other Commission officials whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carlos Sanchez Ferriz and the nine other Commission officials whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
In the Matter of D.S., D.S., A.S., E.S.

No. COA15-788.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2012174EN.01002201.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/22

---

Order of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — El Fatmi v Council

(Joined Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 174/35

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nouriddin El Fatmi (Vught, Netherlands) (represented by G. Pulles and A. M. van Eik (Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08), J. Pauw (Cases T-76/07 and T-362/07) and M. Uiterwaal (T-76/07), lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by G. J. Van Hegelsom and E. Finnegan (T-76/07 and T-362/07), then by B. Driessen and E. Finnegan (T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08), agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented initially by C. Wissels, M. de Mol and Y. de Vries, and by M. de Grave (Case T-76/07), then by C. Wissels, M. Bulterman and J. Langer, agents); and European Commission (represented by S. Boelaert and P. van Nuffel, and, initially, by J. Aquilina (Case T-76/07), agents

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

In essence, application for annulment of Council Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2006 L 379, p. 123), replaced successively by Council Decisions 2007/445/EC of 28 June 2007 (OJ 2007 L 169, p. 58), 2007/868/EC of 20 December 2007 (OJ 2007 L 340, p. 100), 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 (OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21), 2009/62/EC of 26 January 2009 (OJ 2009 L 23, p. 25), Council Regulation (EC) No 501/2009 of 15 June 2009 (OJ 2009 L 151, p. 14), Council Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1285/2009 of 22 December 2009 (OJ 2009 L 346, p. 39), (EU) No 610/2010 of 12 July 2010 (OJ 2010 L 178, p. 1), (EU) No 83/2011 of 31 January 2011 (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 14), and (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), in so far as the applicant is named in the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The General Court orders:

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

| 3. | The European Commission and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a), or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus USA Inc.



|                |  |                                             |  |          |  |                                                                      
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PETER MAINZ |  | /s/ JAMES HILTY                            
|Name:           |  | Peter Mainz                                 |  | Name:    |  | James Hilty                                                          
|Title:          |  | Chief Executive Officer & President         |  | Title:   |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer &Vice President, Business Development
|Company:        |  | Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus USA Inc. |  | Company: |  | Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus USA Inc.                          
|Date:           |  | February 11, 2011                           |  | Date:    |  | February 11, 2011
# C_2017386EN.01000101.xml

| 16.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 November 2017

(2017/C 386/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1840 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4426 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9728 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1675 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7510 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,669 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,11 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2473 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6351 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5979 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5582 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5103 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2435 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7145 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6053 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 306,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0212 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8404 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5553 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 025,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9374 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,177 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,2570 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,096 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8490 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,6887 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,2150 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1840

JPY

Japanese yen

133,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4426

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9728

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1675

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7510

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,669

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,11

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2473

RON

Romanian leu

4,6351

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5979

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5582

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5103

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2435

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7145

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6053

KRW

South Korean won

1 306,21

ZAR

South African rand

17,0212

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8404

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5553

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 025,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9374

PHP

Philippine peso

60,177

RUB

Russian rouble

71,2570

THB

Thai baht

39,096

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8490

MXN

Mexican peso

22,6887

INR

Indian rupee

77,2150

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, David Gao, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   DAVID GAO David Gao  President and Chief Executive Officer     Date:November 14, 2005
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Paul Tidwell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: September 13, 2012  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina, v. Jateke Quazel WILLIAMS, Defendant, and Roland M. Loftin, Jr., Bail Agent, and Agent Associates Insurance, L.L.C., Surety.

No. COA17-3

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.