alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

EXHIBIT 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP SolarTechnologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Leon Assayag, Principal Accounting Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ *Leon Assayag*------------------------------- Leon Assayag Principal Accounting Officer December 17, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementhas been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solelypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is notbeing filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4141 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to enter into enhanced-use leases for excess property of the 

National Cemetery Administration that is unsuitable for burial purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2014 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. 

YOHO, and Mr. MICA) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into enhanceduse leases for excess property of the National Cemetery 

Administration that is unsuitable for burial purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4141 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS TO ENTER INTO ENHANCED-USE 

3 LEASES FOR EXCESS PROPERTY OF THE NA4 TIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION THAT 

5 IS UNSUITABLE FOR BURIAL PURPOSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8162(a)(2) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘only for the provision’’ and all 

9 that follows through the period at the end and in10 serting ‘‘only if the lease is not inconsistent with and 

11 will not adversely affect the mission of the Depart12 ment for—’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraphs: 

15 ‘‘(A) the provision of supportive housing; or 

16 ‘‘(B) other purposes, only in the case of excess 

17 property of the National Cemetery Administration 

18 that is unsuitable for burial purposes.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a lease entered 

21 into after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4075 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4075

   To provide funding to the National Institute of Mental Health to 
 support suicide prevention and brain research, including funding for 
   the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies 
                          (BRAIN) Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2014

  Mr. Barber introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide funding to the National Institute of Mental Health to 
 support suicide prevention and brain research, including funding for 
   the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies 
                          (BRAIN) Initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Suicide Prevention Research 
INnovaTion Act'' or the ``SPRINT Act''.

SEC. 2. SUICIDE PREVENTION AND BRAIN RESEARCH.

    Subpart 16 of part C of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 285p et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 464U-1. SUICIDE PREVENTION AND BRAIN RESEARCH.

    ``(a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Mental 
Health shall use the funds made available to such Institute pursuant to 
subsection (b) exclusively for the purpose of conducting and 
supporting--
            ``(1) research on the determinants of self-directed and 
        other violence associated with mental illness, including 
        studies designed to reduce the risk of self-harm, suicide, and 
        interpersonal violence, especially in rural communities with a 
        shortage of mental health services; and
            ``(2) brain research through the Brain Research Through 
        Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative.
    ``(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to amounts 
otherwise made available to the National Institute of Mental Health, 
including amounts appropriated pursuant to section 402A(a), there are 
authorized to be appropriated to such Institute $40,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2015 through 2019 to carry out this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4067 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction 

on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic 

services in critical access and small rural hospitals 

through 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4067 RDS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION 

2 ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT3 PATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRIT4 ICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 

5 THROUGH 2014. 

6 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

7 continue to apply through calendar year 2014 the enforce8 ment instruction described in the notice of the Centers for 

9 Medicare & Medicaid Services entitled ‘‘Enforcement In10 struction on Supervision Requirements for Outpatient 

11 Therapeutic Services in Critical Access and Small Rural 

12 Hospitals for CY 2013’’, dated November 1, 2012 (pro13 viding for an exception to the restatement and clarification 

14 under the final rulemaking changes to the Medicare hos15 pital outpatient prospective payment system and calendar 

16 year 2009 payment rates (published in the Federal Reg17 ister on November 18, 2008, 73 Fed. Reg. 68702 through 

18 68704) with respect to requirements for direct supervision 

19 by physicians for therapeutic hospital outpatient services). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the MATTER OF Tommie Junior SMITH, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

No. 88A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2017

UNC Center for Civil Rights, by Elizabeth Haddix, Pittsboro, and Mark Dorosin ; and Pressly, Thomas & Conley, PA, Statesville, by Edwin A. Pressly, for claimant-appellant/appellee.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant/appellee State of North Carolina.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *In re Redmond* , --- N.C. ----, 797 S.E.2d 275, 2017 WL 1034554 (2017), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3832 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify the surety bond 

requirement applicable to home health agencies as a condition of participation under Medicare. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2014 

Mr. MCDERMOTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

the surety bond requirement applicable to home health 

agencies as a condition of participation under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEDICARE HOME HEALTH 

4 SURETY BOND CONDITION OF PARTICIPA5 TION REQUIREMENT. 

6 Section 1861(o)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395x(o)(7)) is amended to read as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3832 IH

1 ‘‘(7) provides the Secretary with a surety 

2 bond— 

3 ‘‘(A) in a form specified by the Secretary 

4 and in an amount that is not less than 

5 $50,000; and 

6 ‘‘(B) that the Secretary determines is com7 mensurate with the volume of payments to the 

8 home health agency; and’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOORSOB v. SUPREME COURT of NC

131P16-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 10, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney Geneal, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Somchoi Noonsab, For Noonsab, Somchoi.

Somchoi Noorsob, For Noorsob, Somchoi.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of March 2017 by Petitioner to Default in the Matters of Denied Writ of Habeas Corpus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of March 2017."
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                            TO THE ADESA CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


     WHEREAS, ADESA Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana (the "Sponsoring
Employer") has adopted the ADESA Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of a select group of management and highly
compensated employees; and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Sponsoring Employer has
reserved the right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors, and
pursuant to such right the Sponsoring Employer has previously amended the Plan
by a First Amendment, effective in part as of October 1, 2001 and in part as of
November 1, 2001, by a Second Amendment, effective January 1, 2002, and by a
Third Amendment, effective January 1, 2003; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Sponsoring Employer has approved and
adopted the Fourth Amendment to the Plan to provide for a supplemental benefit
to be paid in the event of a change of control of the Sponsoring Employer which
benefit is intended to help offset the tax consequences of a distribution from
the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Sponsoring Employer has authorized
and directed the President of the Sponsoring Employer to execute the Fourth
Amendment to the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 1, 2003, as
follows:

          Article III is amended by adding thereto a section designated 3.5 to
     read as follows:

          "3.5  TAX SUPPLEMENT BENEFIT. To help pay for any income taxes imposed
     upon a Participant in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, a
     Participant who is entitled to receive a benefit for any reason as a result
     of a Change in Control of the Company will be entitled to a supplemental
     lump sum payment equal to 40 percent of the amount payable to the
     Participant upon the Change in Control."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the President of the Sponsoring Employer has caused
this Fourth Amendment to be executed this 18th day of August, 2003, but
effective as of June 1, 2003.

                                             ADESA CORPORATION


                                             By:  /s/ James P. Hallett
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James P. Hallett, President
ATTEST:

 /s/ Karen C. Turner
-------------------------------------
Karen C. Turner, Secretary
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136404 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136404 

 COA: 283272 

Kent CC: 87-041384-FC 

JESUS F. GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

p1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

No. 04-08-00571-CR 

IN RE Arnulfo ROSALES 

Original Habeas Corpus Proceedings1

Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice 

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice 

 Catherine Stone, Justice 

 Rebecca Simmons, Justice 

Delivered and Filed: October 15, 2008 

PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

Arnulfo Rosales has filed pro se original petitions requesting the issuance of two writs of 

habeas corpus. Rosales, who claims his confinement is illegal for various reasons, seeks review 

and dismissal of the indictment against him and release from confinement. Alternatively, 

Rosales seeks an immediate trial. Rosales is represented by counsel in the trial court. Because 

Rosales’s complaints relate to his pending criminal case, we conclude that trial counsel is 

Rosales’s counsel for any original proceeding on the issues presented. Rosales has no right to 

proceed pro se and be represented by counsel at the same time. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 

1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-0105, styled The State of Texas v. Arnulfo Rosales, 

pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr. presiding. 
04-08-00571-CR 

481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). 

Additionally, the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts are 

authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus in criminal matters. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. 

art. 11.05 (Vernon 2005). However, this court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in 

criminal matters. See Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. 

ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). 

Accordingly, the habeas corpus petitions are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

DO NOT PUBLISH 

-2-
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Robert S. Chramosta, President and
Chief Executive Officer and Troy Fullmer, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


December 3, 2004                  By:   /s/ Robert Chramosta
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Robert Chramosta, President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer


December 3, 2004                  By:  /s/ Troy Fullmer
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Troy Fullmer, Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Juan Carlos RODRIGUEZ.

No. 302A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 22, 2016.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jennifer Martin, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Patrick B. Weede, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Michael Silver, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of February 2016 by Defendant to Amend Record on Appeal:

> *805"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of February 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Somchoi NOORSOB

No. 131P16-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 23, 2017.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Somchoi Noonsab, for Noonsab, Somchoi.

Somchoi Noorsob, for Noorsob, Somchoi.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 21st of February 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of February 2017."
ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC v. ETRANSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

330A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

W. Swain Wood, Attorney at Law, Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, John T. Kivus, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Christopher Jackson, Attorney at Law, For Allscripts Healthcare, LLC.

Tracie H. Brisson, Attorney at Law, For Etransmedia Technology, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of January 2017 by W. Swain Wood to Withdraw as Counsel for Petitioner-Appellant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
---

---

# Exhibit 4.17

# ENGLISH SUMMARY OF THE
LOAN AGREEMENT(ORIGINAL LANGUAGE  HEBREW)

BY AND AMONG

# POINTER (EDEN TELECOM
GROUP) LTD.

# NEXUS TELOCATION
SYSTEMS LTD.

# GANDYR INVESTMENTS LTD.

# GOVLI LTD.

# SULAM FINANCIAL
HOLDINGS LTD.

AND

# EGGED HOLDINGS LTD.

Dated November 16,
2004(the
Agreement)

|Description: 
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
Loan Amount: 
                  
Term and Interest: | Loan Agreement  pursuant to which Nexus Telocation
Systems  Ltd.  ("Nexus"),   Egged  Holdings  Ltd.,
Gandyr  Investments  Ltd.,  Govli  Ltd.  and Sulam
Financial Holdings Ltd. (together,  the "Lenders")
loaned   Pointer   (Eden   Telecom   Group)   Ltd.
("Pointer")  NIS 10 million in connection with the
purchase  by  Pointer of  certain  activities  and
assets of Shagrir  Towing  Services  Ltd.  and its
subsidiary, Shagrir (1985) Ltd.
NIS 10 million  (of which NIS 5 million was loaned
by Nexus).
Interest   repayments   and   repayments   of  the
principal  shall  commence  on  August  28,  2005.
Interest  under  the loan  shall be  payable  at a
rate of 6.5% per year.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# C_2008116EN.01002001.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2008 — Eurocopter v OHIM (STEADYCONTROL)

(Case T-181/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark STEADYCONTROL - Absolute grounds of refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 116/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Eurocopter SAS (Marignane, France) (represented by: initially E. Soler Borda, subsequently R. Zeineh, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2007 (Case R 8/2006-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark STEADYCONTROL as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Eurocopter SAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eurocopter SAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.07-30992

CARL J. SERVAT, JR.

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

2:04-CV-2928

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For essentially the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 10, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk