# Official Journal C 46/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.046.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 46 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5412 February 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.046.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 46

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5412 February 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 046/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 38, 5.2.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 046/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 38, 5.2.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 046/02 | Case C-504/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic lodged on 21 October 2010 — TANOARCH s.r.o. v Tax Directorate of the Slovak Republic | 2 |
| 2011/C 046/03 | Case C-539/10 P: Appeal brought on 22 November 2010 by Stichting Al-Aqsa against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Seventh Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-348/07 Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union | 2 |
| 2011/C 046/04 | Case C-543/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 22 November 2010 — Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA | 3 |
| 2011/C 046/05 | Case C-550/10 P: Appeal brought on 24 November 2010 by the Kingdom of the Netherlands against the judgment delivered by the General Court( Seventh Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-348/07 Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union | 3 |
| 2011/C 046/06 | Case C-551/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 November 2010 by Éditions Odile Jacob SAS against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 13 September 2010 in Case T-279/04 Éditions Jacob v Commission | 4 |
| 2011/C 046/07 | Case C-553/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 November 2010 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 13 September 2010 in Case T-452/04 Éditions Jacob v European Commission | 5 |
| 2011/C 046/08 | Case C-554/10 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2010 by Lagardère SCA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2010 in Case T-452/04 Editions Jacob v European Commission | 5 |
| 2011/C 046/09 | Case C-558/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Chartres (France) lodged on 29 November 2010 — Michel Bourges-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Bourges-Maunoury (née Heintz) v Direction des Services Fiscaux d’Eure et Loir | 6 |
| 2011/C 046/10 | Case C-569/10: Action brought on 3 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 6 |
| 2011/C 046/11 | Case C-571/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 7 December 2010 — Kamberaj Servet v Istituto Per l’Edilizia Sociale della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (IPES), Giunta della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano | 7 |
| 2011/C 046/12 | Case C-573/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 8 December 2010 — Sergiu Alexandru Micșa v Administrația Finanțelor Publice Lugoj, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Timiș, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu | 8 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 046/13 | Case T-286/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hallux — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 9 |
| 2011/C 046/14 | Case T-336/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 9 |
| 2011/C 046/15 | Case T-337/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a reindeer made of chocolate) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a reindeer made of chocolate — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 9 |
| 2011/C 046/16 | Joined cases T-345/08 and T-357/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Rubinstein and L’Oréal v OHIM — Allergan (BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL — Earlier national figurative and word marks BOTOX — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 10 |
| 2011/C 046/17 | Case T-346/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 10 |
| 2011/C 046/18 | Case T-395/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate rabbit — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 10 |
| 2011/C 046/19 | Case T-13/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Storck v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate mouse) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate mouse — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rights of the defence) | 11 |
| 2011/C 046/20 | Case T-161/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Ilink Kommunikationssysteme v OHIM (ilink) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ilink — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 11 |
| 2011/C 046/21 | Case T-192/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Amen Corner v OHIM — Comercio Electrónico Ojal (SEVE TROPHY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SEVE TROPHY — Earlier Community figurative marks Seve Ballesteros Trophy and SEVE TROPHY — Relative grounds for refusal — Lack of similarity of the goods and of the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — No unfair advantage taken of or detriment caused to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 11 |
| 2011/C 046/22 | Case T-281/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer v OHIM (CHROMA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark CHROMA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 12 |
| 2011/C 046/23 | Case T-363/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit (RESVEROL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RESVEROL — Earlier international word mark LESTEROL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 12 |
| 2011/C 046/24 | Case T-497/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — LG Electronics v OHIM (KOMPRESSOR PLUS) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark KOMPRESSOR PLUS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 12 |
| 2011/C 046/25 | Case T-513/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Seated figure) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a seated figure — Earlier Community figurative mark — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002) | 13 |
| 2011/C 046/26 | Case T-73/10 P: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2010 — Apostolov v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Recruitment — Competition — Rejection of application — Delay — Different overall impression — Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded) | 13 |
| 2011/C 046/27 | Case T-549/10: Action brought on 29 November 2010 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Afoi Anezoulaki (natur) | 13 |
| 2011/C 046/28 | Case T-562/10: Action brought on 16 December 2010 — HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping v Council | 14 |
| 2011/C 046/29 | Case T-569/10: Action brought on 13 December 2010 — Bimbo v OHIM — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS) | 15 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2011/C 046/30 | Case F-29/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 December 2010 — Lorenzo v European Social and Economic Committee | 16 |
| 2011/C 046/31 | Case F-35/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 December 2010 — Adriaansen v European Investment Bank | 16 |
| 2011/C 046/32 | Case F-52/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 December 2010 — Merhzaoui v Council of the European Union | 16 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 046/02

Case C-504/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic lodged on 21 October 2010 — TANOARCH s.r.o. v Tax Directorate of the Slovak Republic

2

2011/C 046/03

Case C-539/10 P: Appeal brought on 22 November 2010 by Stichting Al-Aqsa against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Seventh Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-348/07 Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union

2

2011/C 046/04

Case C-543/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 22 November 2010 — Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA

3

2011/C 046/05

Case C-550/10 P: Appeal brought on 24 November 2010 by the Kingdom of the Netherlands against the judgment delivered by the General Court( Seventh Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-348/07 Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union

Stichting Al-Aqsa

Council of the European Union

3

2011/C 046/06

Case C-551/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 November 2010 by Éditions Odile Jacob SAS against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 13 September 2010 in Case T-279/04 Éditions Jacob v Commission

Éditions Jacob

Commission

4

2011/C 046/07

Case C-553/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 November 2010 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 13 September 2010 in Case T-452/04 Éditions Jacob v European Commission

Éditions Jacob

European Commission

5

2011/C 046/08

Case C-554/10 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2010 by Lagardère SCA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2010 in Case T-452/04 Editions Jacob v European Commission

Editions Jacob

European Commission

5

2011/C 046/09

Case C-558/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Chartres (France) lodged on 29 November 2010 — Michel Bourges-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Bourges-Maunoury (née Heintz) v Direction des Services Fiscaux d’Eure et Loir

6

2011/C 046/10

Case C-569/10: Action brought on 3 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

6

2011/C 046/11

Case C-571/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 7 December 2010 — Kamberaj Servet v Istituto Per l’Edilizia Sociale della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (IPES), Giunta della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano

7

2011/C 046/12

Case C-573/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 8 December 2010 — Sergiu Alexandru Micșa v Administrația Finanțelor Publice Lugoj, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Timiș, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

8

General Court

2011/C 046/13

Case T-286/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hallux — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

9

2011/C 046/14

Case T-336/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

9

2011/C 046/15

Case T-337/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a reindeer made of chocolate) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a reindeer made of chocolate — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

9

2011/C 046/16

Joined cases T-345/08 and T-357/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Rubinstein and L’Oréal v OHIM — Allergan (BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL — Earlier national figurative and word marks BOTOX — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

10

2011/C 046/17

Case T-346/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

10

2011/C 046/18

Case T-395/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate rabbit — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

10

2011/C 046/19

Case T-13/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Storck v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate mouse) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a chocolate mouse — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rights of the defence)

11

2011/C 046/20

Case T-161/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Ilink Kommunikationssysteme v OHIM (ilink) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ilink — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

11

2011/C 046/21

Case T-192/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Amen Corner v OHIM — Comercio Electrónico Ojal (SEVE TROPHY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SEVE TROPHY — Earlier Community figurative marks Seve Ballesteros Trophy and SEVE TROPHY — Relative grounds for refusal — Lack of similarity of the goods and of the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — No unfair advantage taken of or detriment caused to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

11

2011/C 046/22

Case T-281/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer v OHIM (CHROMA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark CHROMA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12

2011/C 046/23

Case T-363/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit (RESVEROL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RESVEROL — Earlier international word mark LESTEROL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12

2011/C 046/24

Case T-497/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — LG Electronics v OHIM (KOMPRESSOR PLUS) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark KOMPRESSOR PLUS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12

2011/C 046/25

Case T-513/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Seated figure) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a seated figure — Earlier Community figurative mark — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

13

2011/C 046/26

Case T-73/10 P: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2010 — Apostolov v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Recruitment — Competition — Rejection of application — Delay — Different overall impression — Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

13

2011/C 046/27

Case T-549/10: Action brought on 29 November 2010 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Afoi Anezoulaki (natur)

13

2011/C 046/28

Case T-562/10: Action brought on 16 December 2010 — HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping v Council

14

2011/C 046/29

Case T-569/10: Action brought on 13 December 2010 — Bimbo v OHIM — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS)

15

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 046/30

Case F-29/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 December 2010 — Lorenzo v European Social and Economic Committee

16

2011/C 046/31

Case F-35/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 December 2010 — Adriaansen v European Investment Bank

16

2011/C 046/32

Case F-52/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 December 2010 — Merhzaoui v Council of the European Union

16

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN