alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00944

- CR Rickie RODRIGUEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR4578 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 30, 2019
DIS MISSED Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Rickie Rodriguez pled nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a deadly weap on and was sentenced to five years of imprisonment and a fine of $1500.00 in accordance with the terms of his plea

- bargain agreement. On November 5, 2018, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

ba rgain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court also certified that this is a criminal case “in which the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” After Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification04

- 18

- 00944

- CR

- 2

- and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). “In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before t rial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea

bargain case and that Rodriguez does not have a right to appeal. We must di smiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).
On December 17, 2018, we informed Rodriguez that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that he had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record by January 16, 2019.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio
2003 , order). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM Do not publish
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Stephen Anthony Sosa, Jr.

, * From the 35 th District Court

o f B rown County,

Trial Court No

. CR26271

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 2 12

- CR * June 8 , 2023

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Christopher C. HARRIS v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 349P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 18, 2017

Christopher C. Harris, for Harris, Christopher C.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for the State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 18th of October 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is *145hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of October 2017."
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT The undersigned, Thomas E. Mangold, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), and Timothy A. Bienek,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 11, 2004 /s/ Thomas E. MangoldThomas E. MangoldPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc./s/ Timothy A. BienekTimothy A. BienekExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Curtis, Chief Executive Officer of Greenlite Ventures
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                    

| | By:    | /s/ John Curtis        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | JOHN CURTIS            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | February 22, 2007      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
  be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    /S/ Charles A. Casalinova

Charles A. CasalinovaChief Financial OfficerAugust 8, 2006
 The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

July 23, 2014

 

CommonWealth REIT
 Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 600
 Chicago, IL 60606

 

Re: Transaction Agreement dated June 8, 2009

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Government Properties Income Trust (“GOV”) and CommonWealth REIT (f/k/a HRPT Properties Trust) (“CWH”) are parties to a Transaction Agreement dated June 8, 2009 (the “Transaction Agreement”), which provides, inter alia, for a certain right of first purchase in favor of GOV over certain properties of CWH and certain restrictions on each of CWH and GOV with respect to their investment in real property, all as set forth in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the Transaction Agreement.  CWH and GOV no longer believe continuation of those rights and restrictions are in their respective best interests and each hereby irrevocably waives its respective rights and releases the other from any obligations thereunder.  Accordingly, effective as of the date hereof, all obligations of CWH and GOV under Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the Transaction Agreement shall be deemed null and void and of no further force or effect.

 

Please confirm your agreement by signing below and returning a copy of this letter by e-mail and the original by courier to the undersigned.  An executed copy of this letter shall be deemed an original for all purposes.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Very   truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Government   Properties Income Trust
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Mark L. Kleifges
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Mark   L. Kleifges
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    
	
Agreed:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
CommonWealth REIT
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Orrin S. Shifrin
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Orrin   S. Shifrin
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
EVP,   General Counsel and Secretary
LOCKLEAR v. CUMMINGS, et al.

202A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2017

Walter L. Hart, IV, Attorney at Law, for Locklear, Marjorie C.

David D. Ward, Attorney at Law, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cummings, Matthew S. (M.D.), et al.

Robert A. Ford, Attorney at Law, Demetrius Worley Berry, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Katherine Hilkey-Boyatt, Attorney *424at Law, Raleigh, for Southeastern Regional Medical Center.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of June 2017 by Defendants:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of June 2017."

Defendants shall have up to and including the 21st day of August 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56766-56767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5195]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Saint Peter and the Vatican: The Legacy of the 
Popes''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Saint Peter and the Vatican: 
The Legacy of the Popes,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit 
objects at The Gallery at the Henry B. Gonzales Convention Center, San 
Antonio, TX from on or about October 15, 2005 to on or about January 8, 
2006, The Milwaukee Public Museum from on or about February 4, 2006 to 
on or about May 7, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.
    For further information contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 
202 453-8048). The address

[[Page 56767]]

is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: September 21, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-19360 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1





                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
A. Gould, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



         Date: August 13, 2004                        /s/ Steven A. Gould, M.D.
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Steven A. Gould, M.D.
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
# C_2009180EN.01004601.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/46

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 June 2009 — LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH v OHIM — Dagmar Causley (LiBRO)

(Case T-418/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LiBRO - Earlier Community figurative mark LIBERO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/09) - Partial refusal of registration - Application for annulment brought by the intervener - Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Signature of the response setting out grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal - Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal)

2009/C 180/84

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Guntramsdorf, Austria) (represented by: G. Prantl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Dagmar Causley (Pleidelsheim, Germany) (represented by: W. Günther, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2007 (Case R 1454/2005-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Dagmar Causley and LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses the application of Dagmar Causley; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application of Dagmar Causley;

| 3. | Orders LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH to pay the costs, with the exception of those of Dagmar Causley; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH to pay the costs, with the exception of those of Dagmar Causley;

| 4. | Orders Dagmar Causley to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Dagmar Causley to bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.01.2008.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina, v. Juan Manuel VILLA, Defendant.

No. COA16-1104

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

NO ERROR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

OGDEN DOREMUS KING, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge.

(CR-90-138-N, CA-95-897-N)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ogden Doremus King, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert William

Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

King, Nos. CR-90-138-N; CA-95-897-N (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31-a: Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Monte Ross, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ultradata Systems,
Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.


Date:  August 15, 2005                 /s/  Monte Ross
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Monte Ross, Chief Executive Officer