alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008128EN.01001701.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/17

---

Order of the Court of 19 February 2008 — Tokai Europe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-262/07) (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 - Classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2008/C 128/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Tokai Europe GmbH (represented by: G. Kroemer, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Schønberg and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2007 in Case T-183/04 Tokai Europe v Commission, by which the Court dismissed as inadmissible an action for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 of 1 March 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2004 L 64, p. 21) — Requirement to be individually concerned by the contested regulation — Right to a fair hearing

Tokai Europe

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Tokai Europe GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tokai Europe GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, Paul Tidwell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: June 27, 2011  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Nexus Telocation Systems Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F/A (Amendment No.1) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronen
Stein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|October 26, 2005 |  | /S/ RONEN STEIN
Ronen SteinChief Financial Officer
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Taylor v. Lewis

301P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2016

Michael Anthony Taylor, for Taylor, Michael Anthony.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2016 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2016."
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                               General Media, Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earning to Fixed Charges
                             Year Ended December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        1997             1998             1999             2000            2001
                                                    ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -----------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
      Income (loss) from continuing operations,
         before income taxes                        $ (1,915,000)    $ (3,879,000)    $ 22,606,000     $  5,467,000     $(9,966,000)
                                                    ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -----------

      Adjustments to income (loss)
         Interest expense                              9,918,000        9,918,000        7,969,000        6,865,000       8,003,000
         Interest income                                (611,000)        (517,000)        (762,000)        (495,000)       (289,000)
         Interest expense in rental charges              754,000          757,000          615,000          594,000         594,000
                                                    ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -----------

      Adjusted income (loss)                        $  8,146,000     $  6,279,000     $ 30,428,000     $ 12,431,000     $(1,658,000)
                                                    ============     ============     ============     ============     ===========

      Fixed charges
         Interest expense                           $  9,918,000     $  9,918,000     $  7,969,000     $  6,865,000     $ 8,003,000
         Interest expense in rental charges              754,000          757,000          615,000          594,000         594,000
                                                    ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -----------

      Total fixed charges                           $ 10,672,000     $ 10,675,000     $  8,584,000     $  7,459,000     $ 8,597,000
                                                    ============     ============     ============     ============     ===========

      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 Note (a)         Note (a)              3.54             1.67       Note (a)
</TABLE>

Note (a) - For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 2001 earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges by $2,526,000, $4,396,000 and $10,255,000,
respectively.
# C_2008301EN.01006302.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/63

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-168/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/114)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

1

---
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

VOTING AGREEMENT 

Each of the undersigned directors of Founders Financial Corporation (the “Company”) hereby agrees in his
or her individual capacity as a shareholder to vote his or her shares of Company Common Stock that are registered in his or her personal name (and agrees to use his or her reasonable efforts to cause all additional shares of Company Common Stock
owned jointly by him or her with any other person or by his or her spouse or over which he or she has voting influence or control to be voted) in favor of approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Old National Bancorp
(“Purchaser”) and Company, dated July 25, 2014 (the “Agreement”). In addition, each of the undersigned directors hereby agrees not to make any transfers of shares of Company Common Stock with the
purpose of avoiding his or her agreements set forth in the preceding sentence and agrees to cause any transferee of such shares to abide by the terms of this Voting Agreement. Each of the undersigned is entering into this Voting Agreement solely in
his or her capacity as an individual shareholder and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Voting Agreement, nothing in this Voting Agreement is intended or shall be construed to require any of the undersigned, (i) in his or her
capacity as a director of Company or (ii) in his or her capacity as a trustee, personal representative or other fiduciary capacity, to act or fail to act in accordance with his or her duties in such director or fiduciary capacity. This
Agreement is an individual agreement of each undersigned director with Purchaser and is not an agreement among the undersigned directors. Furthermore, none of the undersigned makes any agreement or understanding herein in his or her capacity as a
director of Company. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, this Voting Agreement shall be effective from the date hereof and shall terminate and be of no further force and effect upon the earliest of (a) the approval of the Agreement
by the shareholders of Company; (b) the termination of the Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (c) upon a Company Adverse Recommendation Change (as defined in the Agreement). This Voting Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. 

Dated this 25th day of July, 2014. 

 

					
	 /s/ Laurie F. Beard
	  		 	 /s/ Charles D. Bukrey, M.D.

	Laurie F. Beard	  		 	Charles D. Bukrey, M.D.
			
	 /s/ Gregory S. Conway
	  		 	 /s/ Mark Crane

	Gregory S. Conway	  		 	Mark Crane
			
	 /s/ Jeanne A. Englehart
	  		 	 /s/ William G. Kozak, P.E.

	Jeanne A. Englehart	  		 	William G. Kozak, P.E.
			
	 /s/ Gary P. Malburg
	  		 	 /s/ James T. Polonczyk

	Gary P. Malburg	  		 	James T. Polonczyk
			
	 /s/ Brent D. Rector
	  		 	 /s/ Brent L. Slay

	Brent D. Rector	  		 	Brent L. Slay
			
	 /s/ Karen B. Wolf
	  		 	
	Karen B. Wolf
STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby JOHNSON

No. 57PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Johnson, Bobby.

Alvin William Keller, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th of February 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4225 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a penalty 

for knowingly selling advertising that offers certain commercial sex acts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4225 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Advertising Vic3 tims of Exploitation Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act of 

4 2014’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ADVERTISING THAT OFFERS CERTAIN COMMER6 CIAL SEX ACTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1591 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended in subsection (a)(1), by inserting 

9 after ‘‘obtains,’’ the following: ‘‘advertises,’’. 

10 (b) MENS REA REQUIREMENT.—Section 1591 of title 

11 18, United States Code, is amended in subsection (a), by 

12 inserting after ‘‘knowing, or’’ the following: ‘‘, except 

13 where, in an offense under paragraph (2), the act consti14 tuting the violation of paragraph (1) is advertising,’’. 

15 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1591(b) 

16 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

17 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or obtained’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘obtained, or advertised’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or obtained’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘obtained, or advertised’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2010113EN.01007801.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/78

---

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — gardeur v OHIM — Blue Rose (g)

(Case T-310/07) (1)

1

2010/C 113/112

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
<PAGE>

                          NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE                     Page 01 of 01
                     13 U.S.C.SECTION 1063(b)(2)

The MARK identified below was published for opposition under 15 U.S.C. 
Section 1062(a). No successful opposition was filed in order to obtain a 
registration, applicant must file a Statement of Use under 15 U.S.C. Section 
1051(d)(1) within six months of the MAILING DATE OF NOTICE identified below. 
A six month extension of time to file the Statement of Use will be granted 
upon proper request. Subsequent six-month extensions will be granted, for a 
period not to exceed twenty-four months, if good cause is shown. 15 U.S.C. 
1051(d)(2). Failure to timely file or perfect Statement of use or request 
for extension of time will result in abandonment of the application. the 
requirements for each are set forth at 37 C.P.R. Sections XXX and XXX.

                                   75/074408

     Paul I. Menes                                  ATTORNEY
     Menes Law Corporation                      REFERENCE NUMBER
     1901 Avenue of the Stars
     Suite 2000                                    2439.01
     Los Angeles, CA 90067

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         PLEASE REVIEW THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE DATA



A request for correction to the notice of allowance should be submitted 
within 10 days to the following address: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR 
TRADEMARKS, 2900 CRYSTAL DRIVE, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-3313. The 
correspondence should be marked to the attention of BOX ITU. The Patent and 
Trademark Office will review the request and make corrections where 
appropriate.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SERIAL NUMBER 75/074408
MARK: PELIGRO
OWNER NAME: Colecciones de Raquel, Inc.
OWNER ADDRESS: 9903 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 477
               Beverly Hills
               CALIFORNIA  90212

MAILING DATE OF NOTICE 02/18/1997

A Statement of Use or a request for an extension of time to file a Statement 
of Use must be RECEIVED by the Patent and Trademark Office within six (6) 
months from the above mailing date.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    GOODS/SERVICES BY INTERNATIONAL CLASS

003-men's essential oils for personal use and hair lotions
                  ALL OF THE GOODS/SERVICES IN EACH CLASS ARE LISTED
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1048

NEW ENGLAND SURFACES, d/b/a DION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, d/b/a DU PONT,

and PARKSITE, INC.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on September 23, 2008, should

be amended as follows:

On page 18, lines 8 and 9, replace Baybutt Constr. Corp. v.

Commercial Union Ins. Co., 455 A.2d 914, 918 (Me. 1983), with

Schroeder v. Rynel, Ltd., Inc., 720 A.2d 1164, 1166 (Me. 1998).

On page 18, footnote 5, lines 5 through 8, replace "Modern

Computer Sys., Inc. v. Modern Banking Sys., Inc., 858 F.2d 1339,

1342-45 (8th Cir. 1988) (agreement to apply Nebraska law to

franchise agreement would not abrogate franchisee's right to

protection under Minnesota Franchise Act)" with "Colt Indus., Inc.

v. Fidelco Pump & Compressor Corp., 700 F. Supp. 1330, 1333 (D.N.J.

1987) (agreement to apply New York law to franchise agreement did

not abrogate franchisee's right to protection under Connecticut and

New Jersey Franchise Acts), aff'd, 844 F.2d 117 (3d Cir. 1988)."

On page 18, line 13, and on page 19, line 4, replace "forum

selection" with "choice of law".

On page 18, continued to first line on page 19, delete "state

precedent".

On page 19, line 1, replace "is" with "has been".

On page 19, replace "does Delaware have "a materially greater

interest" than Connecticut in whether NES may be terminated without

cause?" with "does Connecticut have "a materially greater interest"
than Delaware in whether NES may be terminated without cause?"

On page 19, lines 2 and 3, replace "Pepe v. GNC Franchising,

Inc., 750 A.2d 1167, 1168 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2000)" with "B & E

Juices, Inc. v. Energy Brands, Inc., No. 3:07CV1321, 2007 WL

3124903, at *11 (D.Conn. Oct. 25, 2007)".
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Meeting Notice for Air Force Academy Board of Visitors

    Pursuant to section 9355, Title 10, United States Code, the U.S. 
Air Force Academy Board of Visitors will meet at the Russell Senate 
Office Building in Washington, DC, October 6, 2005. The purpose of the 
meeting is to consider the morale and discipline, curriculum, 
instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, academic methods, and 
other matters relating to the Academy.
    A portion of the meeting will be open to the public while other 
portions will be closed to the public to discuss matters listed in 
paragraphs (2), (6), and subparagraph (9)(B) of subsection (c) of 
section 552b, Title 5, United States Code. The determination to close 
certain sessions is based on the consideration that portions of the 
briefings and discussion will involve information of a personal nature, 
the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy or involve discussions of information or planned or 
considered action the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
frustrate implementation of future agency action. Meeting sessions will 
be held in the Veteran's Committee Room (SR-418) of the Russell Senate 
Office Building, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Brian Lewis, Chief, USAFA Policy 
& Program Support, Directorate of Airman Development & Sustainment, 
Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, AF/DPDOA, 1040 Air Force Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20330-1040, (703) 697-8650.

Eugenia Harms,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19434 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Present: All the Justices EARL J. CRONIN, DECEASED v. Record No. 951573 PER CURIAM June 7, 1996

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA We awarded an appeal in this case to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia which held that an employee's workers' compensation claim is barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-406(A)(5) because the employee became aware more than two years before his death and before his estate filed a claim with the Workers' Compensation Commission for death benefits that he suffered from an occupational disease. City of Alexandria v. Cronin , 20 Va. App. 503, 458 S.E.2d 314 (1995). For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment entered below.

Affirmed

.