United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

J.T., Appellant 

and 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, WATTS 

BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, Spring Hill, TN, 

Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 15-910 

Issued: June 17, 2015 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se 

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

DECISION AND ORDER 

Before: 

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge 

JURISDICTION 

On March 23, 2015 appellant filed a timely appeal from a February 24, 2015 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal 

Employees’ Compensation Act1

 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has 

jurisdiction over the merits of this case. 

ISSUE 

The issue is whether appellant has established greater than an 11 percent binaural hearing 

loss causally related to his federal employment, for which he received a schedule award. 

FACTUAL HISTORY 

Appellant, a 65-year-old machinist/welder, filed an occupational disease claim (Form 

CA-2) on September 3, 2014, alleging a bilateral hearing loss caused by factors of his federal 

 1

 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. 
2

employment. He has been exposed to loud noises from cranes, large rock drills, air movers, 

barges, tugboats, forklifts, pneumatic tools, and welding shops since 1973. Appellant 

occasionally used earplugs for protection. He submitted audiograms from 1976, 1977, 1986, and 

September 3, 2014 which showed mild bilateral hearing loss. 

On December 4, 2014 OWCP referred appellant along with a statement of accepted facts, 

to Dr. Joseph A. Motto, a Board-certified otolaryngologist, for a second opinion. In a 

December 9, 2014 report, Dr. Motto stated that appellant’s workplace noise exposure was 

sufficient as to intensity and duration to have caused the hearing loss in question. He diagnosed 

mild-to-moderately severe noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss and opined that this 

condition was due to noise exposure at his federal employment. Dr. Motto recommended 

hearing aids. An audiogram performed on his behalf on January 23, 2013 reflected testing at the 

frequency levels of 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cycles per second and revealed the following 

decibel losses: 40, 35, 30, and 45 for the right ear and 30, 25, 30, and 40 for the left ear 

respectively. Based on these results and in accordance with the American Medical Association, 

Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (6th ed.) (A.M.A., Guides), Dr. Motto 

determined that appellant had a 10.9375 percent binaural hearing loss. 

In a December 18, 2014 report, an OWCP medical adviser reviewed Dr. Motto’s report 

and audiometric test results. He concurred with Dr. Motto’s audiometric findings that appellant 

had a 18.75 percent monaural hearing loss in the right ear, a 9.375 percent monaural hearing loss 

in the left ear, and found that appellant had an 11 percent sensorineural binaural hearing loss. 

The medical adviser determined that the date of maximum medical improvement was 

December 9, 2014, the date of Dr. Motto’s examination, and authorized hearing aids. 

On January 21, 2015 OWCP accepted appellant’s claim for binaural hearing loss. 

On February 12, 2015 appellant filed a Form CA-7 claim for a schedule award based on 

his binaural hearing loss. 

By decision dated February 24, 2015, OWCP granted appellant a schedule award for an 

11 percent binaural hearing loss. This award covered the period December 9, 2014 to May 11, 

2015 for a total of 22 weeks of compensation. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT 

The schedule award provision of FECA2

 and its implementing regulations3 set forth the 

number of weeks of compensation payable to employees sustaining permanent impairment from 

loss or loss of use, of scheduled members or functions of the body. However, FECA does not 

specify the manner in which the percentage of loss shall be determined. For consistent results 

and to ensure equal justice under the law to all claimants, good administrative practice 

necessitates the use of a single set of tables so that there may be uniform standards applicable to 

 2 Id. at § 8107. 

3

 20 C.F.R. § 10.404. Effective May 1, 2009, OWCP began using the A.M.A., Guides (6th ed. 2009). 
3

all claimants. The A.M.A., Guides has been adopted by the implementing regulations as the 

appropriate standard for evaluating schedule losses.4

OWCP evaluates industrial hearing loss in accordance with the standards contained in the 

A.M.A., Guides.

5

 Using the frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cycles per second, the 

losses at each frequency are added up and averaged.6

 Then, the fence of 25 decibels is deducted. 

The remaining amount is multiplied by a factor of 1.5 to arrive at the percentage of monaural 

hearing loss.7

 The binaural loss is determined by calculating the loss in each ear using the 

formula for monaural loss; the lesser loss is multiplied by five, then added to the greater loss, and 

the total is divided by six to arrive at the amount of the binaural hearing loss.8

 The Board has 

concurred in OWCP’s adoption of this standard for evaluating hearing loss.9

 

Appellant may request a schedule award or increased schedule award based on evidence 

of a new exposure or medical evidence showing progression of an employment-related condition 

resulting in permanent impairment or increased impairment. 

ANALYSIS 

OWCP accepted that appellant sustained a bilateral hearing loss due to noise. It 

developed the claim by referring him to Dr. Motto. On December 9, 2015 Dr. Motto examined 

appellant and an audiogram was obtained on the physician’s behalf. He found, using OWCP’s 

standard procedures, that appellant’s noise exposure in his federal employment was sufficient to 

cause binaural hearing loss. The December 9, 2015 audiogram tested decibel losses at 500, 

1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cycles per second and recorded decibel losses of 40, 35, 30, and 45 

respectively in the right ear. The total decibel loss in the right ear is 150. When divided by 4, 

the result is an average hearing loss of 37.5 decibels. The average of 37.5 decibels, reduced by 

25 decibels (the first 25 decibels were discounted as discussed above), equals 12.5 decibels, 

which when multiplied by the established factor of 1.5 computes a 18.75 percent hearing loss in 

the right ear. 

The audiogram tested decibel losses for the left ear at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cycles 

per second and recorded decibel losses of 30, 25, 30, and 40 respectively. The total decibel loss 

in the left ear is 125. When divided by four, the result is an average hearing loss of 31.25 

decibels. The average hearing loss of 31.25 is reduced by the fence of 25 decibels to 6.25, which 

when multiplied by the established factor of 1.5 computes a 9.375 percent hearing loss in the left 

ear. The binaural loss is determined by multiplying the lessor loss of 9.375 by five, this sum of 

 4 Id.

5

 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 3 -- Medical, Schedule Awards, Chapter 3.700.4.b (January 2010). 

6 Id.

7 Id.

8 Id.

9 See Donald Stockstad, 53 ECAB 301 (2002), petition for recon. granted (modifying prior decision), Docket 

No. 01-1570 (issued August 13, 2002). 
4

46.875 is then added to the greater loss of 18.75 to total 65.625, this sum is then divided by 6 to 

determine the amount of the binaural loss. Therefore under this calculation appellant had an 11 

percent binaural hearing loss, which was properly rounded up to 11 percent binaural loss.10 

It is well established that, if calculations based on the monaural loss for each ear would 

result in greater compensation than calculations for binaural loss, then the monaural hearing loss 

calculations should be used.11 In this case, appellant’s compensation is greater under the 

procedures used for calculating binaural loss. The maximum number of weeks of compensation 

for binaural hearing loss is 200 weeks. See 5 U.S.C. § 8107(c)(13)(b). Appellant’s monaural 

hearing loss of the left ear is 9 percent, whereas his monaural hearing loss of the right ear is 19 

percent. The maximum number of weeks of compensation for monaural hearing loss is 52 

weeks. See 5 U.S.C. § 8107(c)(13)(a). Nine percent of 52 weeks equals 4.68 weeks of 

compensation, and 19 percent of 52 weeks equals 9.88 weeks. The 11 percent binaural hearing 

loss award of 22 weeks of compensation is therefore the greater award. 

Although appellant submitted results from 1976, 1977, 1986, and September 3, 2014 

audiometric tests which showed mild bilateral hearing loss, these audiograms are insufficient to 

satisfy appellant’s burden of proof as they did not comply with the requirements set forth by 

OWCP. These tests lack speech testing and bone conduction scores and were not prepared or 

certified as accurate by a physician as defined by FECA. The audiograms were not accompanied 

by a physician’s opinion addressing how appellant’s employment-related noise exposure caused 

or aggravated any hearing loss. OWCP is not required to rely on this evidence in determining 

the degree of appellant’s hearing loss because it does not constitute competent medical evidence 

and, therefore, is insufficient to satisfy appellant’s burden of proof.12 

Dr. Motto provided a thorough examination and a reasoned opinion explaining how the 

findings on examination and testing were due to the noise in appellant’s employment. The Board 

finds that his January 23, 2013 audiometric test results showing an 11 percent sensorineural 

binaural hearing loss represents the weight of the evidence. As there was no other medical 

evidence showing that appellant had a greater hearing loss causally related to employment 

factors, the Board affirms OWCP’s February 24, 2015 decision granting appellant a schedule 

award based on an 11 percent binaural hearing loss. 

CONCLUSION 

The Board finds that appellant has no greater than an 11 percent binaural hearing loss 

causally related to his federal employment, for which OWCP granted him a schedule award. 

 10 Supra note 5 at Chapter 3.700.4b(2)(b) (January 2010). See also R.C., Docket No. 14-502 (issued 

July 2, 2014). OWCP procedures provide that, in computing hearing loss, percentages should not be rounded until 

the final percent for award purposes is obtained and fractions should be rounded up from .50. 

11 See Reynaldo R. Lichtenberger, 52 ECAB 462 (2001). 

12 Joshua A. Holmes, 42 ECAB 231, 236 (1990). 
5

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs dated February 24, 2015 is affirmed. 

Issued: June 17, 2015 

Washington, DC 

 

 Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board