alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert M. Baker, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report of Sterling Gold Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: January 3, 2005 | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                 
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                      | Robert M. Baker                                     
|                      | President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
|                      | Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, B. Alva Schoomer,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ B. Alva Schoomer
--------------------
B. Alva Schoomer
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

December 23, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. David Lee APPLEWHITE

No. 462P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Brendan O'Donnell, Attorney at Law, Jennifer Harjo, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, for Applewhite, David Lee.

Richard L. Harrison, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*527"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4082 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the work opportunity 

tax credit and to provide such credit for hiring long-term unemployed 

individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2014 

Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the work opportunity tax credit and to provide such 

credit for hiring long-term unemployed individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX 

4 CREDIT AND PROVISION OF CREDIT FOR HIR5 ING LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CRED7 IT.—Section 51(c)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4082 IH

1 (b) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR HIRING LONG-TERM UN2 EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS.— 

3 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(1) of the In4 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (H), by striking 

6 the period at the end of subparagraph (I) and in7 serting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(J) a qualified long-term unemployed in10 dividual.’’. 

11 (2) QUALIFIED LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDI12 VIDUAL.—Section 51(d) of such Code is amended by 

13 striking paragraph (14), by redesignating para14 graphs (11), (12), and (13) as paragraphs (12), 

15 (13), and (14), respectively, and by inserting after 

16 paragraph (10) the following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(11) QUALIFIED LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED

18 INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘qualified long-term unem19 ployed individual’ means any individual who is cer20 tified by the designated local agency as— 

21 ‘‘(A) an individual in receipt of unemploy22 ment compensation under State or Federal law 

23 during the entire 26-week period ending on the 

24 hiring date, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4082 IH

1 ‘‘(B) an individual unemployed for such 

2 period who would have received such compensa3 tion for such period but for having exhausted 

4 the right to such compensation.’’. 

5 (3) CREDIT LIMITED TO $1,000 FOR HIRING OF

6 EACH LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDIVIDUAL.—Sec7 tion 51(b)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting 

8 ‘‘($2,500 in the case of any qualified long-term un9 employed individual)’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

12 the employer after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE

v.

Jeral Thomas ORE, Jr.

352P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, for Ore, Jeral Thomas (Jr.)

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
  






 
 COMMON INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP
68906L 10 5 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF OTONOMY, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its
duly authorized officers. Dated: PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL & BUSINESS OFFICER AND SECRETARY COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE OTONOMY, INC.
AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 







 



 
 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF
SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND
DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE
ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UTMA
– Custodian ____________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act ________________________________ and not as tenants in common
(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received _____ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital
stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated ________________
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES
MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CAMILLE FORD, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-98-1206-2) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 29, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Camille Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ford , Nos. 94-163; CA-98-1206-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2001; entered June 18, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending April 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





/s/
                MARK GUSTAFSONMark
                GustafsonPresident
                (Principal Executive Officer)April
                30, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3777 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3777

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disregard students as 
   employees for purposes of determining employer health care shared 
                            responsibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2013

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disregard students as 
   employees for purposes of determining employer health care shared 
                            responsibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Jobs for Students Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDENTS DISREGARDED AS EMPLOYEES FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING 
              EMPLOYER SHARED RESPONSIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 4980H of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), 
and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively, and by inserting 
after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Exception for students.--The number of employees 
        employed by an employer for any period shall be determined 
        without regard to any individual who, during such period--
                    ``(A) is a student enrolled at an institution of 
                higher education (as defined in section 102 of the 
                Higher Education Act of 1965), and
                    ``(B)(i) is participating in an activity under a 
                Federal work-study program under part C of title IV of 
                the Higher Education Act of 1965,
                    ``(ii) is employed as a condition of such 
                enrollment, of such individual's degree program, or of 
                receiving a scholarship or tuition reduction with 
                respect to such enrollment,
                    ``(iii) is receiving credit towards a degree at 
                such institution with respect to employment by such 
                employer, or
                    ``(iv) is employed by such institution (other than 
                employment described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii)) and 
                is carrying at least \1/2\ the normal full-time work 
                load for the course of study the student is 
                pursuing.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136209 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136209 

 COA: 283090 

Kent CC: 07-009350-FH 

LESTER THOMAS TUDOR, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court. At 

sentencing, the defendant requested a number of corrections to the presentence 

investigation report, and the court indicated that most of the changes would be made. 

The copy of the report in the record does not reflect those changes. On remand, the 

circuit court shall assure that a corrected copy of the report is prepared and transmitted to 

the Michigan Department of Corrections per MCR 6.425. In all other respects, leave to 

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d0910 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 17, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2008022EN.01003302.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 22 November 2007 — Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-515/07)

(2008/C 22/60)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Respondent:

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 6(2) and 17(1), (2) and (6) of the Sixth VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as permitting a taxable person to allocate wholly to his business not only capital goods but all goods and services used both for business purposes and for purposes other than business purposes and to deduct immediately and in full the VAT due on the acquisition of those goods and services? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 6(2) and 17(1), (2) and (6) of the Sixth VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as permitting a taxable person to allocate wholly to his business not only capital goods but all goods and services used both for business purposes and for purposes other than business purposes and to deduct immediately and in full the VAT due on the acquisition of those goods and services?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is affirmative, does the application of Article 6(2) of the Sixth Directive to services and goods other than capital goods mean that VAT is collected once during the tax period over which the deduction in respect of those services and goods is enjoyed, or must collection also occur in ensuing periods and, if so, how is the taxable amount to be determined in respect of goods and services which the taxable person does not write off? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is affirmative, does the application of Article 6(2) of the Sixth Directive to services and goods other than capital goods mean that VAT is collected once during the tax period over which the deduction in respect of those services and goods is enjoyed, or must collection also occur in ensuing periods and, if so, how is the taxable amount to be determined in respect of goods and services which the taxable person does not write off?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
# EUR-Lex - 11957A - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS ( EAEC TREATY ) - CONTENTS **

*

*

+++++

- TEXT OF THE TREATY

PREAMBLE

TITLE ONE - THE TASKS OF THE COMMUNITY

TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY

CHAPTER I : PROMOTION OF RESEARCH

CHAPTER II : DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

CHAPTER III : HEALTH AND SAFETY

CHAPTER IV : INVESTMENT

CHAPTER V : JOINT UNDERTAKINGS

CHAPTER VI : SUPPLIES

CHAPTER VII : SAFEGUARDS

CHAPTER VIII : PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

CHAPTER IX : THE NUCLEAR COMMON MARKET

CHAPTER X : EXTERNAL RELATIONS

TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS

CHAPTER I : THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY

CHAPTER II : PROVISIONS COMMON TO SEVERAL INSTITUTIONS

CHAPTER III : THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

TITLE FOUR - FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS

TITLE SIX - PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE INITIAL PERIOD

FINAL PROVISIONS

ANNEXES

/ * 157AN * /

ANNEX I - FIELDS OF RESEARCH CONCERNING NUCLEAR ENERGY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 4 OF THIS TREATY

ANNEX II - INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 41 OF THIS TREATY

ANNEX III - ADVANTAGES WHICH MAY BE CONFERRED ON JOINT UNDERTAKINGS UNDER ARTICLE 48 OF THIS TREATY

ANNEX IV - LIST OF GOODS AND PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER IX ON THE NUCLEAR COMMON MARKET

ANNEX V - INITIAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING PROGRAMME REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 215 OF THIS TREATY

BREAKDOWN BY MAIN HEADINGS OF THE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED TO CARRY OUT THE RESEARCH AND TRAINING PROGRAMME

- PROTOCOLS

PROTOCOL ON THE APPLICATION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY TO THE NON-EUROPEAN PARTS OF THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

/ * 157A/PRO/N * /

PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY

/ * 157A/PRO/CJ * /

PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY

/ * 157A/PRO/PRI * /

- CONVENTION ON CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS COMMON TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

/ * 157A/CNV/COM * /

SECTION I : THE ASSEMBLY

SECTION II : THE COURT OF JUSTICE

SECTION III : THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

SECTION IV : THE FINANCING OF THESE INSTITUTIONS

FINAL PROVISIONS