alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002* In connection with the Annual Report of The Cronos Group (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter
J. Younger, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. March 14, 2005 /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
Dennis J. Tietz, Chief Executive Officer /s/ PETER J. YOUNGER
Peter J. Younger, Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.   *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, is
not deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said
Act. E5
STATE of North Carolina v. Lance Foster FURR, Jr.

No. COA15-1184.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51165

Summary Calendar

 

RUTH NUNEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA SIMMS; GLENNA ARCHER,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CV-336-DB

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ruth Nunez appeals the district court’s award of attorneys’

fees to the appellees, the prevailing parties in Nunez’s 42

U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. Nunez’s suit stemmed from

the termination of her employment contract as a teacher with the

El Paso Independent School District. Following the assertion of

qualified immunity by the defendants, the district court

dismissed the suit on the basis that Nunez had not alleged the

violation of a clearly established constitutional right as she
No. 02-51165

-2-

had no property interest in her continued employment as a

teacher. This court affirmed the dismissal. See Nunez v. Simms,

341 F.3d 385, 386 (5th Cir. 2003). While the appeal on the

merits was pending, the district court granted the defendants’

motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and FED. R. CIV.

P. 54(d), finding that Nunez’s lawsuit was frivolous.

Although Nunez’s lawsuit and her appeal on the merits were

unsuccessful, her case was not so lacking in merit that it was

groundless. See Nunez, 341 F.3d at 387-92; United States v.

Mississippi, 921 F.2d 604, 609 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the

district court clearly erred in finding that the lawsuit was

frivolous, and abused its discretion in awarding attorneys’ fees

to the defendants. See Mississippi, 921 F.2d at 609.

REVERSED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137062 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137062 

 COA: 275840 

Wayne CC: 06-010798-01

ELARNSIL ODOM, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYD BROS TRANSPORTATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,006,826
<SECURITIES>                                   250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,475,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (347,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    326,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,369,559
<PP&E>                                      90,562,678
<DEPRECIATION>                             (28,680,556)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,455,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,418,931
<BONDS>                                     34,688,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,082
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,389,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,455,768
<SALES>                                    133,137,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              124,919,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,330,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,887,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,430,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,457,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,457,370
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99


</TABLE>
Betty P. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. Allen Toby HEDGEPETH, et al., Defendant.

No. COA15-706

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

DISMISSED.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52005AP0276

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (COM(2004)0634 - C6-0130/2004 - 2004/0231(COD))***Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0266 - 0284*

P6_TA(2005)0276

European pollutant release and transfer register ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (COM(2004)0634 — C6-0130/2004 — 2004/0231(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0634) [1],

- having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0130/2004),

- having regard to the UN/ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries (A6-0169/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 57302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special 
Emphasis Panel, November 2, 2005, 8 a.m. to November 2, 2005, 5 p.m., 
Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814 
which was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2005, 70 
FR 54759-54760.
    The meeting will be held at the Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817, rather than at the Residence Inn 
Bethesda, as previously reported. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 22, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-19541 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC., et al. v. SHERIFF OF ONSLOW COUNTY, et al.

363A14-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 13, 2017

Mr. S. C. Kitchen, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Hans J. (in his official capacity)

Mr. George B. Hyler, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheville, Mr. Stephen P. Agan, Attorney at Law, for Gift Surplus, LLC

Mr. Michael A. Grace, Attorney at Law, Mr. Christopher R. Clifton, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Ms. Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Mr. Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Sandhill Amusements, Inc.

Mr. Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. J. Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, for Senter, Mark J. (Branch Head) (in his official capacity)

Mr. Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Mr. James R. Morgan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Sheriff of Onslow County, North Carolina, et al

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of October 2017 by Plaintiffs for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of November 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60783

Summary Calendar

LUCIA LOPEZ DE RUIZ

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A90 744 688

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lucia Lopez de Ruiz (Ruiz) seeks review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejecting her claim for relief under former § 212(c)

of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The BIA concluded that Ruiz’s prior

conviction for fraud did not have a statutory counterpart in § 212(a), relying on

8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5), and In re Blake, 23 I. & N. Dec. 722 (BIA 2005), petition

for review granted & remanded, Blake v. Carbone, 489 F.3d 88, 91 (2d Cir. 2007).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 05-60783

2

Ruiz argues that Blake and its interpretation of § 1212.3(f)(5) is incompatible

with INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001); violates the constitutional doctrines of

equal protection, due process, and separation of powers; is inconsistent with

statutory language and Supreme Court precedent; and is inconsistent with the

BIA’s prior practice. She further challenges the determination that fraud is not

a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of § 212(c) relief. 

In light of our decisions in Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007),

and Avilez-Granados v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 869, 871-72 (5th Cir. 2007), we reject

Ruiz’s claims. The petition for review is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

      ( print page 54970)    

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice. 

# DATES:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On July 27, 2005, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of permit applications received. A permit was issued on August 31, 2005 to:                

Rebecca J. Gast, Permit No. 2006-019.

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-18574  Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
KB AIRCRAFT ACQUISITION, LLC v. Jack M. BERRY, Jr. and 585 Goforth Road, LLC

No. 349PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed November 3, 2017

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, L.L.P., by Byron L. Saintsing, for plaintiff-appellant.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Clint S. Morse and John H. Small, for defendant-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
State v. Carl Lynn Williams

482P13-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017.

Ms. Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Carl Lynn Williams, Lumberton, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of November 2016 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4189 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4189

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. 
  Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON, MASTER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. 
              RIECK AND VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant 
Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Master 
Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4189

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. 
  Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4295 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to collect 

and maintain data on the number of sexual assaults that occur on 

aircraft during flights in passenger air transportation, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to collect and maintain data on the number of 

sexual assaults that occur on aircraft during flights in 

passenger air transportation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Airline Pas5 sengers from Sexual Assaults Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEXUAL ASSAULT DATA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4295 IH

1 Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a program 

2 to collect and maintain data on the number of sexual as3 saults that occur on aircraft during flights in passenger 

4 air transportation. 

5 (b) DATA AVAILABILITY.—The Administrator shall 

6 make available to the public on the primary Internet Web 

7 site of the Federal Aviation Administration the data main8 tained under subsection (a). 

9 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi10 nitions apply: 

11 (1) AIR TRANSPORTATION.—The term ‘‘air 

12 transportation’’ has the meaning given that term in 

13 section 40102(a)(5) of title 49, United States Code, 

14 and includes intrastate air transportation. 

15 (2) AIRCRAFT.—The term ‘‘aircraft’’ has the 

16 meaning given that term in section 40102(a)(6) of 

17 title 49, United States Code. 

18 (3) INTRASTATE AIR TRANSPORTATION.—The 

19 term ‘‘intrastate air transportation’’ has the mean20 ing given that term in section 40102(a)(27) of title 

21 49, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Javonta Marquez ELLIS and Stephon Deandre Jennings

No. 197P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Ms. Katherine Jane Allen, Durham, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Jennings, Stephon Deandre.

Mr. Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, For Ellis, Javonta Marquez.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of May 2016 by Defendant (Javonta Marquez Ellis) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57190-57191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 219

[DFARS Case 2005-D020]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extension of 
Partnership Agreement--8(a) Program

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to reflect an extension in 
the expiration date of a partnership agreement between DoD and the 
Small Business Administration (SBA). The partnership agreement permits 
DoD to award contracts to 8(a) Program participants on behalf of SBA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Tronic, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DAR), IMD 3C132, 
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-
0289; facsimile (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2005-D020.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    By partnership agreement dated February 1, 2002, between the SBA 
and DoD, the SBA delegated to DoD its authority to enter into contracts 
under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)). The 
expiration date of the partnership agreement has been extended from 
September 30, 2005, to September 30, 2006. This final rule amends DFARS 
219.800 to reflect the extension.
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This rule will not have a significant cost or administrative impact 
on contractors or offerors, or a significant effect beyond the internal 
operating procedures of DoD. Therefore, publication for public comment 
is not

[[Page 57191]]

required. However, DoD will consider comments from small entities 
concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. 
Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2005-D020.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does 
not impose any information collection requirements that require the 
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

0
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 is amended as follows:

PART 219--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 219 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.


219.800  [Amended]

0
2. Section 219.800 is amended in paragraph (a), in the last sentence, 
by removing ``2005'' and adding in its place ``2006''.

[FR Doc. 05-19456 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P