alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 173/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 173 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 173

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 173/01 | Commission Notice — Guidance Note relating to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community Part Two – Citizens’ Rights | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 173/01

Commission Notice — Guidance Note relating to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community Part Two – Citizens’ Rights

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1611.

#### Walker *v.*The State.

Indictment for unlawful sale of liquor, from city court of Dalton- — -Judge Longley. December 16, 1908.

Submitted January 26,

Decided February 9, 1909.

*George G. Glenn,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. K. McCutchen, solicitor, Sam.P. Maddox,*contra.

Powell, J.

No error of law is assigned. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction. *Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2010100EN.01004001.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/40

---

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2010 — Commission v CdT

(Case T-456/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Community pension scheme - Obligation on CdT to pay a contribution in connection with the budget years 1998 to 2005 - Non-actionable measure - Measure not producing legal effects in respect of third parties - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 100/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Pasquier and D. Martin, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: initially, G. Versanden, and, subsequently, L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the alleged decision by which CdT refused to pay into the general budget, in connection with the budget years 1998 to 2005, a contribution representing the part of the financing of the Community pension scheme falling to the employer

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006 (formerly Case C-269/06).

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136818 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136818 

 COA: 274938 

Kalamazoo CC: 03-000054-CZ 

STEVEN B. KURTZ, d/b/a MIDWEST

COMMUNICATIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Andrew WALLACE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 151296

Supreme Court of Virginia.

June 2, 2016

In this case, we awarded appellant an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court did not err in its denial of the appellant's motion to dismiss the charge against him. *Wallace v. Commonwealth* , 65 Va.App. 80, 774 S.E.2d 482 (2015).

We have considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment.

This Order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and to the Circuit Court of the City of Newport News and shall be published in the Virginia Reports.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH 

DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE 

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

STARBUCKS CORPORATION 

D/B/A STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY , 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-157

LT Case No. 2020-CA-109

SHERRY GOLD, CHRISTINE

MAZZANTI WARD AND ISLAND

WALK STATION, LLC, A FOR PROFIT CORPORATION, 

Appellees. 

________________________________/

Decision filed March 28, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Nassau County, 

Eric C. Roberson, Judge.

Meagan L. Logan, of Douglas & Douglas,

Lake City, for Appellant. 

Benjamin E. Richard, Curry Gary Pajcic, 

Elizabeth T. Cardenas, and Meredith A. 

Ross, of Pajcic & Pajcic, P.A., Jacksonville, 

for Appellee, Sherry Gold. 

No Appearance for Remaining Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
# C_2010011EN.01002403.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2009 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — De Francesco Import (SpagO)

(Case T-438/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SpagO - Earlier national word mark SPA - Relative ground for refusal - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 11/47

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV, (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. De Brouwer, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse, D. Moreau, J. Pagenberg, A. von Mühlendahl and S. Abel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: De Francesco Import GmbH, (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and H. Lindner, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 September 2007 (Case R 1285/2006-2), relating to opposition proceedings between De Francesco Import GmbH and Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

134198 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 134198 COA: 277673 Kalamazoo CC: 06-001346-FC WILLIE EARL RIDDLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for le ave to appeal the June 5, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, purs uant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kalamazoo Circuit Court for amendment of the presentence report. Th e circuit judge stated at the sentencing hearing on December 11, 2006 that he would make a note in the pr esentence report that the defendant denies that his family fears him, but the presenten ce report was not amended in accordance with that statement. Therefore, th e circuit court shall direct the probation officer to amend the presentence report to note that the defendant denies that his family fears him. MCR 6.425(E)(2). The circuit court is furthe r ORDERED to ensure that the amended presentence report is transmitted to the Departme nt of Corrections. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be review ed by this Court.

p0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
exhibit_10-1.htm



Exhibit 10.1




 


ManpowerGroup Inc.


100 Manpower Place


Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53212







May 1, 2014


 


Mr. Jeffrey A. Joerres


Executive Chairman


c/o ManpowerGroup Inc.


100 Manpower Place


Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212


 


Jeff:


 


Please refer to our letter agreement dated and accepted by you on February 20, 2014 (the “Compensation Agreement”) regarding your compensation and benefits.  In connection with the change in your position from CEO to Executive Chairman of the Board, effective as of May 1, 2014, we have agreed to amend the Compensation Agreement as follows:


 


1.           The first sentence of Paragraph 2 shall be amended to read:


 


“You will be paid a base salary for your services from the date hereof, and during the remainder of the  Term at the rate of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per year, as may be increased from time to time by the Corporation.”


 


The capitalized terms used above which are not otherwise defined in this letter will have the meanings assigned to them in the Compensation Agreement.  Except as modified by this letter, the Compensation Agreement will remain in full force and effect.


 


Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning to the Corporation a copy of this letter.


 


MANPOWERGROUP INC.







By:  


/s/ Richard Buchband                                                                        


Richard Buchband


Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary


 


 


Agreed as of the 1st day of May, 2014







By: 


/s/ Jeffrey A. Joerres                                                                


Jeffrey A. Joerres
WHITE v. ADAMS

S16A1655

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided, January 23, 2017

Murble Anita Wright, The Wright Law Group, 195 Jonesboro Road, Jonesboro, Georgia 30236-8404, for Appellant.

Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, Judge, Superior Court of Fulton County, 185 Central Avenue, S.W., Suite T-4905, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, Brittanie Danielle Browning, Assistant Attorney General, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Department of Law, 40 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30334, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur, except Grant, J., who is disqualified.
Ollie WILLIAMS Jr., Plaintiff, v. Ramon ROJANO (both personally and in his role of former Director of Human Services); Regina Y. Petteway (interim director of Wake County Human Services); Patricia Baker (both personally and in her role as Social Services Director); Louis Jackson; Tomiko Hicks; Wake County; Wake County Department of Human Services; Wake County Division of Social Services; and Systems & Methods, Inc., d/b/a North Carolina Centralized Collections, Defendants.

No. COA16-6

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 72/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.072.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 72 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5418 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.072.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 72

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5418 March 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | | 2011/159/EU |
| | * | Decision No 1/2011 of the EU-Swiss Joint Committee of 18 January 2011 on the authentication in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, including the Final Act thereto, and the 2004 Enlargement Protocol | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

2011/159/EU

*

Decision No 1/2011 of the EU-Swiss Joint Committee of 18 January 2011 on the authentication in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, including the Final Act thereto, and the 2004 Enlargement Protocol

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136061(46) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136061 

 COA: 274133 

Iosco CC: 06-002566-FH 

CLIFFORD EUGENE COMSTOCK, JR, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2008 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4189 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4189

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. 
  Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON, MASTER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. 
              RIECK AND VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant 
Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Master 
Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4030 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

18640 NW 2nd Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Father Richard 

Marquess-Barry Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

Ms. WILSON of Florida (for herself, Mr. GARCIA, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. MICA, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. 

DEUTCH, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. WEBSTER

of Florida, Mr. ROSS, Mr. YOHO, and Mr. BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 18640 NW 2nd Avenue in Miami, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Father Richard Marquess-Barry Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4030 IH

1 SECTION 1. FATHER RICHARD MARQUESS-BARRY POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 18640 NW 2nd Avenue in 

5 Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Father Richard Marquess-Barry Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Father Richard Mar11 quess-Barry Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7166

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT CY MANN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:98-cr-00047-11)

Submitted: June 6, 2008 Decided: September 18, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Cy Mann, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Cy Mann appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for correction of sentence filed under 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3582 (West 2005). We review the denial of a motion to modify a

sentence for abuse of discretion. United States v. Turner, 59 F.3d

481, 483 (4th Cir. 1995). Our review of the record discloses no

abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of relief. We

affirm the district court’s order as modified to reflect that the

motion was denied without prejudice so that Mann may refile his

motion should he obtain proper evidence of exhaustion from the

Bureau of Prisons. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Ohio Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard K. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.



By: /s/ Richard K. Smith
Name: Richard K. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2003
STATE of North Carolina, v. Angela Katrina BARNES Defendant, and Jerry A. Rogers, Bail Agent, and Agent Associates Insurance, L.L.C., Surety.

No. COA17-14

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

VACATED. REMANDED.
# C_2010328EN.01005701.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/57

---

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2010 — Sepracor v OHIM — Laboratorios Ern (LEVENIA)

(Case T-280/07) (1)

1

()

2010/C 328/88

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3933 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include firearms in the 

types of property allowable under the alternative provision for exempting 

property from the estate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. COLLINS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include 

firearms in the types of property allowable under the 

alternative provision for exempting property from the 

estate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Gun Own5 ers in Bankruptcy Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS. 

7 Section 522 of title 11, the United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3933 IH

1 (1) in subsection (d) by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(13) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

4 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single firearm or fire5 arms.’’, and 

6 (2) in subsection (f)(4)(A)— 

7 (A) in clause (xiv) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end, 

9 (B) in clause (xv) by striking the period at 

10 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(xvi) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

13 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single firearm or fire14 arms.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

16 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub17 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

18 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act. 

20 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend21 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

22 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

23 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS