alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                            2318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31602
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1651
<INVENTORY>                                      31702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 66213
<PP&E>                                          200949
<DEPRECIATION>                                   80944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  255317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            61451
<BONDS>                                         323298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16801
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (137164)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    255317
<SALES>                                         271830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           199227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   243228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (249)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ADESA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David G. Gartzke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), that:



|/s/DAVID G. GARTZKEChief Executive Officer |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
STATE of North Carolina v. James Harold COURTNEY, III, Defendant

No. COA16-366

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6338

GREGORY GENE STARKS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:06-cv-00693-RBS)

Submitted: September 3, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Gene Starks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Gene Starks, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Starks has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to my
      knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.








/s/
      MARK GUSTAFSON


Mark
      Gustafson


President
      (Principal Executive Officer)


June
      13,
      2007
STATE v. Pierre Je Bron MOORE

243P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 28, 2017

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Moore, Pierre Je Bron.

Joseph E. Herrin, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of July 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of July 2017."
State of North Carolina v. Waverly Orlando Harshaw, Jr.

No. 337P00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Waverly Orlando Harshaw, Jr., for Harshaw, Waverly Orlando, Jr.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th of October 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Catawba County, the following order was entered and is *332hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Edmunds, J. recused

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of October 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Edmunds, J. recused

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of October 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Edmunds, J. recused
Christian G. PLASMAN, in his individual capacity and derivatively for the benefit of, on behalf of and right of nominal party Bolier & Company, LLC, Plaintiff v. DECCA FURNITURE (USA), INC., Decca Contract Furniture, LLC, Richard Herbst, Wai Theng Tin, Tsang G. Hung, Decca Furniture, Ltd., Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC, Dongguan Decca Furniture Co. Ltd., Darren Hudgins, Decca Home, LLC, and Elan by Decca, LLC, Defendants and Bolier & Company, LLC, Nominal Defendant v. Christian J. Plasman (a/k/a Barrett Plasman), Third-Party Defendant

No. 127P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Matthew K. Rogers, Attorney at Law, Hickory, for Plasman, Christian G.

Robert A. Muckenfuss, Attorney at Law, Andrew D. Atkins, Attorney at Law, Jodie H. Lawson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., et al.

Robert A. Muckenfuss, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant on the 19th of April 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of April 2017 by Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant to Consolidate Appeals:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             176,964
<SECURITIES>                                       100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,845,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                       153,377
<INVENTORY>                                        551,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,700,450
<PP&E>                                           3,134,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,238,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,320,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,541,871
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            26,673
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,588,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,320,044
<SALES>                                         12,352,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,352,132
<CGS>                                            8,008,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,008,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,383,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   112,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (420,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           456
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (420,988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (420,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.17)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4028 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4028

To amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to include the 
  desecration of cemeteries among the many forms of violations of the 
                      right to religious freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2014

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to include the 
  desecration of cemeteries among the many forms of violations of the 
                      right to religious freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT OF 1998.

    Section 2(a)(4) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 
(22 U.S.C. 6401(a)(4)) is amended in the fourth sentence by inserting 
``desecration of cemeteries,'' after ``confiscations of property,''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, May 20, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 19

- 00382

- CV

____________
HARRIS COUNTY APPRAI SAL DISTRICT , Appellant

V.

ANJALI BRAUN, INDIVI DUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THOSE

SIMILARLY SITUATED , Appellee

On A ppeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 07942



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 17, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the reco rd. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not
been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry , the official court reporter, to file the record in this
appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 21.1

                       BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

*        BroadVision Switzerland, A.G., organized under the laws of Switzerland

*        BroadVision Franc, S.A., organized under the laws of France

*        BroadVision Germany GmBH, organized under the laws of Germany

*        BroadVision U.K., Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom

*        BroadVision B.V., organized under the laws of the Netherlands

*        BroadVision  Professional  Services  (formerly  Fidutec  Information
         Technology,  SA),  organized  under  the  laws of Switzerland

*        BroadVision Srl, organized under the laws of Italy

*        BroadVision Asia Pacific Ltd., organized under the Companies Ordinance
         of Hong Kong

*        BroadVision Singapore PTE. LTD., organized under the laws of Singapore

*        BroadVision Korea Company LTD., organized under the laws of Korea

*        BroadVision Scandinavia AB, organized under the laws of Sweden
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 1

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-344-CR

JOSHUA LEWIS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 211 DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TH

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex.

R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 23, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army of Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: February 24, 2005.
    Location: The Washington Court Hotel, 525 New Jersey Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20001-1527, (1-202-628-2100).
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the 
funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund. The Board will also consider its priorities for 
the next fiscal year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CEMP-POD, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-1934.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-1913 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1310

DAVID R. CORBIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BLADEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY; H.

GOLDSTON WOMBLE, JR.; DONALD SHERRILL; ALAN I.

MAYNARD; ALLEN W. ROGERS; AJIT NAIK, MD; MYRA

HOLLOWAY; DONNA PARNELL; BILL SCARLETT; TOMMY

GRIFFIN; EARL BUTLER; VANN PARKER; ELIZABETH

KIEVER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-03-181-H-3)

Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. H. Goldston Womble, Jr.,

Elizabethtown, North Carolina; James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS &

COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Alan I. Maynard,

Elizabethtown, North Carolina; Allen W. Rogers, Fayetteville, North

Carolina; Mark E. Anderson, PATTERSON, DILTHEY, CLAY, BRYSON &

ANDERSON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ryan Michael Shuirman,
- 2 -

YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina; Douglas Edward

Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North

Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Raleigh, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE,

SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

David R. Corbin appeals from the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Corbin v. Bladen County, CA-03-181-H-3

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2003 & Jan. 6, 2004). We deny Ajit Naik’s

motion for certificate of service default and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Francisco ECHEVERRIA, Defendant.

No. COA16-673

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

NO ERROR.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36551

5 DAMIAN ARENAS,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

8 Karen L. Townsend, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

13 Santa Fe, NM

14 Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender

15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 VIGIL, Judge.

19 {1} Defendant appeals from his conviction for felony DWI, entered pursuant to a
2

1 conditional plea, wherein he reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of

2 his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds. This Court issued a calendar notice

3 proposing to affirm relying, in part, on State v. Hill, 2005-NMCA-143, ¶ 12, 138 N.M.

4 693, 125 P.2d 1175. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition requesting that

5 this Court revisit our holding in Hill. However, given that our holding in Hill was

6 premised on binding New Mexico Supreme Court precedent, we decline to revisit that

7 holding. As a result, we conclude that Defendant has not demonstrated a speedy trial

8 violation. Accordingly, we affirm. 

9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

10 _________________________________

11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 ___________________________

14 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

15 ___________________________

16 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
G. Burton, Sr., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cenveo, Inc. (the
‘‘Company’’), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 2,
2010 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 3, 2010
              /s/ Robert G. Burton,
      Sr.Robert
      G. Burton, Sr.Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




/s/
                MARK GUSTAFSONMark
                GustafsonPresident
                (Principal Executive Officer)March
                6, 2008