alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 229/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.229.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 521 September 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.229.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 229

English edition

Legislation

Volume 521 September 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC (1)

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009) | 29 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009)

OJ L 211, 14.8.2009

29

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
DOOLITTLE v. GEORGE, et al.

195P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2017

Natalia K. Isenberg, Attorney at Law, Bryan T. Simpson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for George, Robert M.

Paul A. Tharp, Attorney at Law, Matthew R. Arnold, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, J. Bradley Smith, Attorney at Law, for Doolittle, Chelsea.

Patrick H. Flanagan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Sipe, Vidal A., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of June 2017 by Defendant (Robert M. George) for Leave to File Reply to Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petition for Writ of Supersedeas, and Motion for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2017."
In the MATTER OF: J.F.

No. COA16-1169

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 16, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Opinion filed December 16, 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00286

- CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.W., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No . FM 51

, 610

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 7, 2010, the trial court signed a temporary order following an advers a ry

hearing. Gerald Blace West fi led a pro se notice of appeal.

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a motion to dismiss on

the grounds that the October 7 order is not appealable. The clerk of this court wrote West and

direct ed him to respond to the motion to dismiss on or before December 6 , 2010. West has not

filed a response

.

The October 7 order is a non

- appeable interlocutory order. T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. §

105.001(e) (Vernon 2008 ); T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008 ). The

motion is granted, and the appeal is d ismissed.

December 16, 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Exhibit
      23.3





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders


BroadVision, Inc.





We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
      on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13846, 333-109709, 333-97521, 333-63798, 333-35114,
      333-62619, and 333-14057) of our report dated March 26, 2007 relating to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedule of BroadVision, Inc. included
      in
      this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.








/s/
      ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP




San
      Francisco, California


March 26,
      2007
# Official Journal C 254/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 254 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6429 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 254

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6429 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 254/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10282 — ICG/Infra Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 254/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10297 — CDPQ/OTPP/Ohio) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2021/C 254/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 254/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10282 — ICG/Infra Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 254/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10297 — CDPQ/OTPP/Ohio) (
  1
  )

1

2

2021/C 254/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 254/04 | Euro exchange rates — 28 June 2021 | 4 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2021/C 254/05 | Special Report No 13/2021 – EU efforts to fight money laundering in the banking sector are fragmented and implementation is insufficient | 5 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 254/06 | Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 254/04

Euro exchange rates — 28 June 2021

4

Court of Auditors

2021/C 254/05

Special Report No 13/2021 – EU efforts to fight money laundering in the banking sector are fragmented and implementation is insufficient

5

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 254/06

Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------


                    METROTRANS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Years Ended December 31,
                                             --------------------------------
                                             1997           1996        1995
                                             ----           ----        ----
<S>                                         <C>           <C>         <C>
NET INCOME                                  $1,717        $3,319      $3,030
                                            ======        ======      ======

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

      Weighted average common
         shares outstanding                  4,040         4,015       3,985
                                             =====         =====       =====

      Basic earnings per share               $0.43         $0.83       $0.76
                                             =====         =====       =====
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

      Weighted average common
         Shares outstanding                  4,040         4,015       3,985

      Add - Dilutive effect of outstanding
         options (as determined by the
         application of the treasury stock
         method)                                72            92           8
                                            ------        ------      ------

      Adjusted weighted average common
         shares outstanding                  4,112         4,107       3,993
                                            ======        ======      ======

      Diluted earnings per share            $ 0.42        $ 0.81      $ 0.76
                                            ======        ======      ======

</TABLE>
SCOT-17-0000811

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

_________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF CONTESTED CASE HEARING RE

CONSERVATION DISTRICT USE APPLICATION (CDUA) HA-3568

FOR THE THIRTY METER TELESCOPE AT THE MAUNA KEA SCIENCE

RESERVE, KA#OHE MAUKA, HAMAKUA, HAWAI#I, TMK (3)404015:009

_________________________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

(BLNR-CC-16-002 (Agency Appeal))

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DISMISSAL

FOR NON-PAYMENT OF FILING FEES

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Nakayama, J., recused)

Upon consideration of Temple of Lono’s motion to set

aside the order dismissing the appeal for non-payment of the

filing fees, filed on January 8, 2018, the documents attached

thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it

appears that good cause exists for the untimely payment of the

filing fees, which was received by the appellate clerks’ office

on January 11, 2018. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. The

January 4, 2018 order dismissing the appeal for non-payment of

the filing fees is set aside, and the appeal is reinstated.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 12, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCOT-17-0000811

12-JAN-2018

02:34 PM
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark Harris, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: May 5, 2016 | By:    | /S/ MARK HARRIS

         |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|              |   | Mark Harris                    |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|              |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40968

ROLAND MORENO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. A. COLLINS; PEREZ, Warden,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-C-95-270)

January 9, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Prisoner-appellant Roland Moreno filed a notice of appeal in this civil action

before April 26, 1996, the effective date of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of
2

1995 (PLRA). The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing in forma pauperisin a civil

action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. If funds for immediate

payment are not available, this court is to assess and, when funds exist, collect, as

a partial payment of the filing fee, 20 percent of the greater of: (a) the average

monthly deposits to Moreno’s trust-fund account, or (b) the average monthly

balance in that account for the six-month period immediately preceding November

17, 1995, the date of the filing of the notice of appeal herein. After payment of the

initial partial filing fee, funds shall be deducted from Moreno’s account until the

full filing fees are paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1),(2). Adepegba v. Hammons,

___ F.3d ___, 1996 WL 742523 (5th Cir., Dec. 31, 1996).

Moreno has 30 days from the date of this order to comply with the PLRA

requirements, including:

1) payment of the appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court;

or

2)(a) the filing in this court of an affidavit stating all assets that Moreno

possesses; and 

 (b) the filing of a certified statement by the custodian of Moreno’s trustfund account for the six-month period immediately preceding the date of the filing

of the notice of appeal herein.
3

The clerk of this court is directed to provide Moreno with the proper forms

for compliance herewith.

This appeal is held in abeyance until Moreno complies herewith or until the

expiration of 30 days, whichever comes first. If Moreno does not comply within

the 30 days, the clerk of this court is directed to dismiss the appeal for lack of

prosecution. See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3.

APPEAL HELD IN ABEYANCE. COSTS ORDER ENTERED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                       42,287
<SECURITIES>                                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                24,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    763
<INVENTORY>                                                                 132,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            206,122
<PP&E>                                                                       95,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                                               23,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                              283,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                        43,737
<BONDS>                                                                      60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                     18,359
<OTHER-SE>                                                                  168,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                283,981
<SALES>                                                                     372,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                            372,331
<CGS>                                                                       205,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                               335,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              4,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            1,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                              31,431
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 12,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                          19,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                 19,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                  0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                  0.91



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Israel ROGERS

No. CO16-1087

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 6, 2017

VACATED.
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

HELENA,MONTANA 59620-3003 Supreme Court No. DA 20-0498 THOMAS JAMES BICK,

Petitioner, Obligor and Appellant, v. KATHLEEN JO JOHNSON,

Respondent, Obligee and Appellee, and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION,EX REL.,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# FILED DEC 1 7 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under M.R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension oftime until January 20, 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's brief. DATED this December 17, 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Thomas James Bick,Robert J. Waller, Timothy Charles Fox, Andrew Warlick Betson

PO BOX 203003 •

HELENA MT •59620-3003 • TELEPHONE:(406)444-3858 •FAX:(406)444-5705 12/17/2020 Case Number: DA 20-0498
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4198 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4198

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate the requirement for 
an annual report on the capacity of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
   to provide for specialized treatment and rehabilitative needs of 
                           disabled veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2014

  Mr. Denham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate the requirement for 
an annual report on the capacity of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
   to provide for specialized treatment and rehabilitative needs of 
                           disabled veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Appropriate Care for Disabled 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT ON THE CAPACITY OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIALIZED 
              TREATMENT AND REHABILITATIVE NEEDS OF DISABLED VETERANS.

    The first sentence of section 1706(b)(5)(A) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``through 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)   | to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ James A. Hughes             |
|---------------------------------------|
| James A. Hughes                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

|  /s/ Alan J. Bedner                             |
|------------------------------------------------------|
| Alan J. Bedner                                       |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
# C_2009019EN.01002501.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 November 2008 — Rajani v OHIM — Artoz-Papier (ATOZ)

(Case T-100/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ATOZ - Earlier international word mark ARTOZ - No requirement to provide evidence of genuine use - Starting point for the five-year time-limit - Date of registration of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Obligation to state the reasons on which a measure is based - Articles 73 and 79 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Article 6 of the ECHR)

(2009/C 19/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Deepak Rajani (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Dustmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Artoz-Papier AG (Lenzburg, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 January 2006 (Case R 1126/2004-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Artoz Papier AG and Deepak Rajani.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deepak Rajani to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deepak Rajani to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---