alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPIInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Joel Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| /s/ Joel A. Littman     |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| Joel A. Littman         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 14, 2006         |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55910-55914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA 225-04-8000]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and the Food and Drug Administration Alumni Association

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and the Food and Drug 
Administration Alumni Association, Inc. The purpose of this MOU is to 
establish a greater collaboration between FDA and the Food and Drug 
Administration Alumni Association, Inc., regarding FDAs 2006 Centennial 
Observance.

DATES: The agreement became effective July 28, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hitch, Senior Advisor, Office of 
External Relations (HF-10), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 
301-827-4406.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[[Page 55911]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23SE05.068


[[Page 55912]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23SE05.069


[[Page 55913]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23SE05.070


[[Page 55914]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23SE05.071

[FR Doc. 05-19016 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 18, 2014

d0611 

# Order

Clerk June 18, 2014

148041 & (91)

LINDA THURSFIELD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 148041

COA: 302186

Oakland CC: 05

- 070476

- CK

DAVID THURSFIELD,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

strike is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel in Earth Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Earth Sciences Proposal Review Panel (1569).
    Date & Time: October 20-21, 2005, 8 a.m.-6 p.m.
    Place: UNAVCO Inc., 6350 Nautilus Drive, Boulder, CO 80301.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open--(see Agenda below).
    Contact Person: Mr. Russell Kelz, Program Director, 
Instrumentation & Facilities Program, Division of Earth Sciences, 
National Sciences Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8558.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out review of UNAVCO management and 
leadership as stipulated in cooperative agreement EAR-0321760.

Agenda

    Closed: October 20 from 8:30-9:30 a.m.: organization meeting, 
introductions, review of charge to review panel, discussion of COI; 
and from 1-5 p.m.: panel discussion, write up of summary of findings 
and recommendations. October 21 from 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.: complete 
panel summary and recommendations.
    Open: October 20 from 9:30 a.m.-12 p.m.: Presentation by UNAVCO, 
Inc management and Q&A between panel and UNAVCO, Inc.; October 21 
from 3-4 p.m.: Presentation of panel draft findings to NSF/EAR/IF 
Program.
    Reason for Closing: During the closed sessions, the panel will 
be reviewing information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information, financial data such as salaries, 
and personal information that could harm individuals if they are 
disclosed. If discussions were open to the public, these matters 
that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government 
in the Sunshine Act would be improperly disclosed.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19081 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3993 

To provide for a 15 percent reduction in the rates of pay of Members 

of Congress for pay periods occurring during a year if a Federal budget 

deficit existed during the most recent fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2014 

Mr. BENTIVOLIO (for himself and Mr. BENISHEK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and 

in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a 15 percent reduction in the rates of pay 

of Members of Congress for pay periods occurring during 

a year if a Federal budget deficit existed during the 

most recent fiscal year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spending Account5 ability Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3993 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IF 

2 BUDGET DEFICIT EXISTED AT END OF PRE3 VIOUS YEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a)(2) of the Legisla5 tive Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(C) If the total outlays of the Government during 

8 a fiscal year exceed the total revenues of the Government 

9 during that fiscal year, as determined by the Congres10 sional Budget Office— 

11 ‘‘(i) each annual rate of pay referred to in para12 graph (1) shall be reduced by 15 percent for all pay 

13 periods occurring during the next calendar year 

14 which begins after that fiscal year; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) no adjustment may be made under sub16 paragraph (A) in any such rate of pay during that 

17 next calendar year.’’. 

18 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 601(a)(2)(A) 

19 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Subject to subpara20 graph (B),’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subparagraphs (B) 

21 and (C),’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2014 

24 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009044EN.01006902.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/69

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Collée v Parliament

(Case F-148/06) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - Procedure for allocating merit points in the European Parliament - Examination of comparative merits)

(2009/C 44/119)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Laurent Collée (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and A. Lukošiūtė)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of 9 January 2006 allocating two merit points to the applicant under the 2004 promotion procedure and second, a declaration that paragraph I.3 of the ‘Instructions on the procedure for the allocation of promotion points’ of the European Parliament of 13 June 2002 is illegal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision allocating two merit points to Mr Collée under the 2004 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision allocating two merit points to Mr Collée under the 2004 promotion procedure;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42 of 24.2.2007, p. 48.

1

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00430-CR

No. 10-16-00433-CR

IN RE RAHEEM ABDULLAH WATKINS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petitions for writ of mandamus is denied.1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

 

1 Relator’s petitions for writ of mandamus lack proof of service on the State, which is the real party 

in interest in these proceedings because it was a party in the underlying criminal cases. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.2. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties (i.e., the trial-court judge 

and the State through the district attorney in this proceeding) and must contain proof of service. Id. at R. 

9.5. Here, relator indicates in his proof of service that he has served these documents on this Court, rather 

than the trial-court judge and the State. However, to expedite these matters, we invoke Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend these requirements. Id. at R. 2.
In re Watkins Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 28, 2016

[OT06]
STATE v. Tilmon Charles GOLPHIN

441A98-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2017

Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Kenneth J. Rose, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Golphin, Tilmon Charles.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of March 2017 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2017."

Beasley, J. recused
# Official Journal C 52/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5813 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 52

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5813 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2015/C 052/01 | Opinion No 1/2015
  (pursuant to Articles 322 and 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
  concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2015/C 052/01

Opinion No 1/2015
  (pursuant to Articles 322 and 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
  concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union

(pursuant to Articles 322 and 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
State of North Carolina v. Michelle Lynn Bailey

No. COA16-356

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. James David NANNEY.

No. COA15-476.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-165276, 333-159075, 333-145764, 333-138461, 333-109709, 333 97521, 333-63798, 333-35114, 333-62619, and 333-14057) and on Form S-3 (333 125640) of BroadVision, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of BroadVision, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP






San Francisco, California


March 3, 2011
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2008 – DC-Hadler Networks v Commission**

**(Case T-264/06)**

Public supply contracts – TACIS programme – Decision to annul the call for tenders – Application for annulment – Duty to state reasons

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Action brought against an implemented decision (Art. 230 EC) (see
paras 18-19)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Commission decision annulling a public supply contract
tender procedure (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 29, 32-34)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION to annul the Commission decision of 14 July 2006 to annul the tender procedure in respect of Europe Aid/122742/C/SUP/RU relating to the supply of IT and office equipment for the information network and of social integration and rehabilitation-related equipment for the disabled in the federal district of the Volga (Russian Federation). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the Commission decision of 14 July 2006 annulling the tender procedure in respect of Europe Aid/122742/C/SUP/RU; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Commission and DC-Hadler Networks to pay their own costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,396
<PP&E>                                           9,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,251
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,529
<SALES>                                         17,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,166
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4202 

To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal benefits programs 

based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for the elderly. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2014 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and 

Government Reform and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal 

benefits programs based on increases in the Consumer 

Price Index for the elderly. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CPI–E Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4202 IH

1 SEC. 2. COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES FOR CERTAIN FED2 ERAL BENEFITS PROGRAMS BASED ON IN3 CREASES IN THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX 

4 FOR THE ELDERLY. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whenever 

6 there is an increase in the Consumer Price Index for the 

7 elderly, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 

8 dollar amounts in effect for the payment of the following 

9 benefits, as such amounts were in effect immediately be10 fore the increase in the Consumer Price Index for the el11 derly, shall be increased by the same percentage as such 

12 price index was increased: 

13 (1) An annuity under the Civil Service Retire14 ment System or the Federal Employees Retirement 

15 System. 

16 (2) Department of Veterans Affairs wartime 

17 disability compensation under section 1114 of title 

18 38, United States Code. 

19 (3) Department of Veterans Affairs additional 

20 compensation for dependents under section 1115(1) 

21 of such title. 

22 (4) The Department of Veterans Affairs cloth23 ing allowance under section 1162 of such title. 

24 (5) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency 

25 and indemnity compensation to surviving spouse 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4202 IH

1 under subsections (a) through (d) of section 1311 of 

2 such title. 

3 (6) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency 

4 and indemnity compensation to children under sec5 tions 1313(a) and 1314 of such title. 

6 (7) Military retirement and survivor benefit 

7 programs, as defined in section 1461(b) of title 10, 

8 United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4247 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that disabled veterans 

with a disability rating greater than or equal to 70 percent receive 

preference with respect to employment in the competitive service, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

ENYART, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, and Mr. HECK of Nevada) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that disabled veterans with a disability rating greater than or 

equal to 70 percent receive preference with respect to 

employment in the competitive service, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans 

5 Jobs Opportunity Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4247 IH

1 SEC. 2. HIRING PREFERENCE FOR DISABLED VETERANS 

2 WITH AT LEAST 70 PERCENT DISABILITY RAT3 ING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3309 of title 5, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

7 (1); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of para9 graph (2); and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(3) a preference eligible under section 

13 2108(3)(C) of this title with a service-connected dis14 ability or combination of service-connected disabil15 ities rated as not less than 70 percent disabling by 

16 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs—15 points.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

19 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any exam20 ination for entrance into the competitive service 

21 taken on or after the date of enactment of this sec22 tion. 

23 (2) EXAMINATIONS PRIOR TO DATE OF ENACT24 MENT OF THIS SECTION.— 

25 (A) IN GENERAL.—With respect to any in26 dividual who received a passing grade on such 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4247 IH

1 an examination in 2014 but before the date of 

2 enactment of this section, the relevant hiring 

3 agency shall send notification to any such indi4 vidual to determine whether such individual is 

5 eligible for the additional points provided by 

6 paragraph (3) of section 3309 of title 5, United 

7 States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this 

8 section). 

9 (B) DEADLINE.—Beginning on the date 

10 that an individual receives notification under 

11 subparagraph (A), such individual shall have 30 

12 days to respond to the relevant hiring agency in 

13 order to receive credit for such points. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS