alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19203]



[[Page 56366]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-21874; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-28]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Dodge City Regional Airport, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Dodge City Regional Airport, KS.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on July 29, 2005 
(70 FR 43744). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on October 27, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on September 8, 2005.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Service Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-19203 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
WIDENI77 v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, I-77 Mobility Partners LLC, and State of North Carolina

No. 336P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Matthew R. Arnold, Paul A. Tharp, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, for WidenI77.

J. Bradley Smith, Attorney at Law.

Michael G. Adams, Morgan H. Rogers, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, Mitchell A. Karlan, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, New York, NY, Jerilin Buzzetta, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, New York, NY, for I-77 Mobility Partners LLC.

Scott T. Slusser, Special Deputy Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 5th of June 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motions to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants' (NC Department of Transportation and State of NC) and (I-77 Mobility Partners, LLC) and, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motions to dismiss the appeal are

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of June 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
NLNK-2014.06.30-EX10.8


EXHIBIT 10.8






NEWLINK GENETICS CORPORATION 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT NOTICE 
(2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED)
[IMMEDIATELY VESTED]
NewLink Genetics Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), hereby awards to Participant a Restricted Stock Unit Award for the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Restricted Stock Units”) set forth below (the “Award”). The Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth in this notice of grant (this “Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice”) and in the Plan and the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Award Agreement”), both of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein in their entirety. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan or the Award Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms in the Award and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall control.
Participant:        
ID:        
Date of Grant:        
Grant Number:        
Number of Restricted Stock Units/Shares:        




		
	Vesting Schedule: 
	The shares subject to the Award shall be fully vested upon issuance.




		
	Issuance Schedule:
	Subject to any change on a Capitalization Adjustment, one share of Common Stock will be issued for each Restricted Stock Unit that vests at the time set forth in Section 6 of the Award Agreement.


Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:  Participant acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice, the Award Agreement and the Plan. Participant further acknowledges that as of the Date of Grant, this Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice, the Award Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between Participant and the Company regarding the acquisition of the Common Stock pursuant to the Award specified above and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on the terms of this Award with the exception, if applicable, of (i) the written employment agreement or offer letter agreement entered into between the Company and Participant specifying the terms that should govern this specific Award, and (ii) any compensation recovery policy that is adopted by the Company or is otherwise required by applicable law. 
By accepting this Award, Participant acknowledges having received and read the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice, the Award Agreement and the Plan and agrees to all of the terms and conditions set forth in these documents. Participant consents to receive Plan documents by electronic delivery and to participate in the Plan through an on-line or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.


Other Agreements: _______________________________________________________________

1.
403016 v1/CO 


EXHIBIT 10.8




NEWLINK GENETICS CORPORATION    PARTICIPANT
By:             
Signature    Signature
Title:         Date:     
Date:    
		
	ATTACHMENTS: 
	Award Agreement and 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended





2.
403016 v1/CO
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

To promote United States economic growth and job creation and strengthen 

strategic partnerships with United States allies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2014 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. OLSON, Mr. 

RYAN of Ohio, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Ms. JENKINS, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. 

GERLACH, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. KING of New York, 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. BILIRAKIS, 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. DENT, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MARINO, 

Mr. PEARCE, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To promote United States economic growth and job creation 

and strengthen strategic partnerships with United States 

allies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Job Creation 

5 and Strategic Alliances LNG Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4139 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF EXPORTATION OF NAT2 URAL GAS TO WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION 

3 COUNTRIES. 

4 Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 717b(c)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For purposes’’; 

7 (2) by inserting ‘‘or to a World Trade Organi8 zation country’’ after ‘‘trade in natural gas’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘World 

11 Trade Organization country’ means a country described 

12 in section 2(10) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act 

13 (19 U.S.C. 3501(10)).’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with 

16 respect to applications for the authorization to export nat17 ural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 

18 U.S.C. 717b) that are pending on, or filed on or after, 

19 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 614/2006

of 19 April 2006         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for black scabbardfish in ICES VIII, IX, X (Community waters and international waters) by vessels flying the flag of France

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2006 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2006.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 860/2005 (OJ L 144, 8.6.2005, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4046 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4046

   To strike provisions that prohibit the Director of the Office of 
    National Drug Control Policy from studying the legalization of 
marijuana, that require the Director to oppose any attempt to legalize 
                   marijuana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2014

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To strike provisions that prohibit the Director of the Office of 
    National Drug Control Policy from studying the legalization of 
marijuana, that require the Director to oppose any attempt to legalize 
                   marijuana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unmuzzle the Drug Czar Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION AND REQUIREMENT ON THE DIRECTOR OF THE 
              OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY RELATING TO 
              MARIJUANA.

    Section 704(b) of the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1703(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (12);
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (13) through (20) as 
        paragraphs (12) through (19), respectively; and
            (3) in paragraph (13)(A), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``paragraph (13)'' and inserting ``paragraph (12)''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

PSS World Medical, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement FileNos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043, 333-64185, 33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754, 333-30427, 333-50526, and 333-58272 on Form S-8 of PSS World Medical, Inc. of our report dated June 7, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofPSS World Medical, Inc. as of April 2, 2004, and March 28, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 2, 2004, and therelated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the April 2, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of PSS World Medical, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-16, *Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from aVendor,*effective November 21, 2002, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, *Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections,* effective March 29, 2003.

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Jacksonville, Florida 

June 11, 2004
Abrons Family Practice & Urgent Care, PA, et al. v. NC Department of Health & Human Services, et al.

427A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 31, 2017.

Mr. Camden R. Webb, Ms. Elizabeth Connolly Stone, Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, For Abrons Family Practice And Urgent Care, PA, et al.

Mr. Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Assistant Attorney General, For North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

Ms. Jennifer K. Van Zant, Greensboro, Mr. Charles F. Marshall, III, Mr. Bryan Starrett, Greensboro, Mr. Bryant C. Boren, Jr., Mr. Ryan L. Bangert, Mr. Van H. Beckwith, Attorney at Law, For Computer Sciences Corporation.

Mr. Mark S. Thomas, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of January 2017 by Bryant C. Boren for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of January 2017."
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700107

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### DILLAN B. MEJIA Seaman (E

- 3 ), U.S. Navy Appellant

_________________________ Appeal from the Uni ted States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: C aptain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: C ommanding Officer, USS NIMITZ (CVN 68)

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Co mmander

James M. Kennedy, JAGC, USN

. For Appe llant : Lieutenant C aptain James Kresge, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 31 J uly 2017

_________________________ Before C AMPBELL , L OCHNER , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After care ful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court

- martial order sha ll reflect that the lesser included offense to which the appellant pled guilty in Specification 2 of Charge II was a violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
GREENE v. WHITE

424P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2016

Corey Delon Greene, for Greene, Corey Delon.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of November 2016 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

*681"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of December 2016."
In the MATTER OF: A.J.S.

No. COA17-205

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 16
- 00357
- CV

K. E. P., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 14
- 006547, HONORABLE TI M SULAK, JUD GE PRESIDING

O R D E R PER CURIAM

Appellant K.E.P. filed her notice of appeal on May 26, 2016 . The appellate record was complete June 3, 2016 , making appellant ’ s brief due June 23, 2016

. To date, appellant ’ s brief has not been filed

.

Amendments to th e rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days f

or court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater

com pliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore we order counsel to file appellant ’ s brief no later than July 14, 2016 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on June 29, 2016

.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin , and Field
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald R. Kiepert,
Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    DONALD R. KIEPERT,
JR.Name: Title: Date:

Donald R. Kiepert, Jr. President and Chief Executive
Officer June 1, 2004




I, Richard
N. Small, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    RICHARD N. SMALLName: Title:

Richard N. Small Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerDate:

June 1, 2004




A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Point Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Point Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending July 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Mark Gustafson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      to my knowledge that:





(1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Triangle Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Triangle Petroleum
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




/s/
                MARK GUSTAFSONMark
                GustafsonPresident
                (Principal Executive Officer)March
                6, 2008
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-063-CV

IN RE NYAGUDI O. OKUMU RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator's application for writ of habeas corpus

and for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Accordingly, relator's application for writ of habeas corpus and for emergency

relief is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2009