alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.34

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul R.
Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: May 22, 2003                      /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MITY Enterprises and will be retained by MITY Enterprises and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SMC CORPORATION                                                      EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT OF CALCULATION OF AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               Nine Months
                                                                                                  Ended
                                                             Three Months Ended               September 30,
                                                             September 30, 1998                   1998
                                                         --------------------------        -------------------

<S>                                                                <C>                         <C>
Basic Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of shares                               6,498,905                   6,494,677

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of shares                               6,498,905                   6,494,677

   Stock option plan shares to be issued at prices
     ranging from $7.375 to $9.00 per share                          993,500                     993,500

   Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                      125,000                     125,000

                                                               -------------                ------------
Less:  Assumed purchase of shares by the Company at the                                                                  
       average market price during the period using the                                                                  
       proceeds received upon the assumed exercise of the                                                                
       outstanding options and warrants                           (1,118,500)                 (1,094,514)       
                                                               -------------                ------------

       Total Diluted Shares                                        6,498,905                   6,518,663
                                                               =============                ============
</TABLE>
# C_2008092EN.01002803.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 18 February 2008 — Jurado Hermanos v OHIM (JURADO)

(Case T-410/07 R)

(Interim measures - Community trade mark - Removal of the trade mark from the register - Application for ‘restitutio in integrum’ - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 92/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Jurado Hermanos, SL (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: C. Martín Álvarez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. López Fernández de Corres, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the removal from the register of Community word mark No 240218 and of the legal effects of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2007 (R 866/2007-2) concerning the application for ‘restitutio in integrum’ brought by Jurado Hermanos, until the Court of First Instance has ruled on the action in the main proceedings

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51049

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

REGINALD BRONSHA JOHNSON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-21-2

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Reginald Bronsha Johnson has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
In the MATTER OF: A.K. and A.K.

No. COA16-837

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4152 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4152

        To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2014

  Mr. Rogers of Kentucky (for himself and Mrs. Lowey) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, 
and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF COSTS OF LOAN GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE.

    From amounts appropriated or otherwise made available under 
``Economic Support Fund'' in division K of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76), and prior Acts making 
appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and 
related programs, funding from unobligated balances shall be made 
available for the costs, as defined in section 502 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974, of loan guarantees for Ukraine, which are 
authorized to be provided in an appropriations Act, in accordance with 
section 504 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974: Provided, That 
amounts made available for the costs of such guarantees shall not be 
considered ``assistance'' for the purpose of provisions of law limiting 
assistance to such country: Provided further, That none of the funds 
may be made available from amounts designated pursuant to section 
251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act 
of 1985.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Daryl WILLIAMS

171A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 1, 2017

Gilda C. Rodriguez, Attorney at Law, for Williams, Daryl.

Scott Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of June 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of June 2017."
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Arel Communications and Software Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Yelin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/S/ DANIEL YELIN        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Daniel Yelin            | 
|Chief Financial Officer
|June 28, 2005           | 
|                        | 









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth, Inc.
do hereby certify that:





(a) the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PureDepth, Inc. for the three months
ended  October 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
Inc.








Dated:  December
11, 2009


/s/
      Andrew L. WoodMr.
      Andrew L. Wood, Chief Executive Officer and Director





/s/
      Joseph A. MoranMr.
      Joseph A. Moran, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009019EN.01000301.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Stuttgart (Germany)) — Krystyna Zablocka-Weyhermüller v Land Baden-Württemberg

(Case C-221/07) (1)

1

(Benefits granted to surviving spouses of victims of war - Condition of residence on the national territory - Article 18(1) EC)

(2009/C 19/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sozialgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Krystyna Zablocka-Weyhermüller

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Baden-Württemberg

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sozialgericht Stuttgart — Compatibility with Community law of national provisions limiting the exportability of benefits for surviving spouses of victims of war (Hinterbliebenenversorgung)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(1) EC is to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which the latter refuses to pay certain benefits granted to surviving spouses of victims of war solely because they are domiciled in the territory of certain specific Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement (No. 333-193458) on Form S-1 of AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation of our report dated April 15, 2014,relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporatedin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

/s/ PBMares, LLP

 

Richmond, Virginia

April 15, 2014
# Official Journal C 157/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 628 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 157

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 628 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 157/01 | Commission notice on guidance on cooperative procurement in the fields of defence and security (Defence and Security Procurement Directive 2009/81/EC) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 157/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/Parts Point Group) (
  1
  ) | 10 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 157/01

Commission notice on guidance on cooperative procurement in the fields of defence and security (Defence and Security Procurement Directive 2009/81/EC) (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 157/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/Parts Point Group) (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 157/03 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |
| 2019/C 157/04 | Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 12 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 157/03

Euro exchange rates

11

2019/C 157/04

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

12

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 157/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9364 — Stoa/InfraVia II Invest/SBI Crypto Investment/Tiger Infrastructure Europe/Etix Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 13 |
| 2019/C 157/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9375 — Clearlake/Insight/Appriss) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 157/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9364 — Stoa/InfraVia II Invest/SBI Crypto Investment/Tiger Infrastructure Europe/Etix Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

13

2019/C 157/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9375 — Clearlake/Insight/Appriss) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. R A / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T TI M OTHY EDW ARD H OLZ, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. R O B E R T E . M C F A D D E N , R egi on al D ir e c to r ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 55565 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 7 -cv -0 1 4 1 0 -D S F -P JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a l e S . F i s c he r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T i m othyE dw a r d H ol z , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on w i tho utprej ud i ce for f ai l ure t o p aythe part i al i ni t i al fi l i ng fe e. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSR A/ Res ea r ch 08- 55565 2 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , T

a ylo r v. D ela to o re , 281 F .3 d 8 4 4 , 8 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dw e v a c a te a n dr e m a n d . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d is m is s e d th e a c tio n w ith o u t d e te rm in in g w h e th e rH o lz ha d f unds t o pa ythe pa rt i a l i ni t i a l f i l i ng f e e i n i t s e nt i r e tya tthe t i m e the pa y m e nt w a s or de r e d. B e c aus e H ol z de m ons tr a t e d i n hi s r e s pons e t o the or de rt o s how c aus e tha the l a c ke d the f unds t o pa ythe e nt i r e f

e e , the di s tr i c tc ourts houl d not h a v e d is m is s e d th e a c tio n . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 ( b ) ( 1 ) , ( 4 ) ; T ay lor , 281 F . 3d a t850 ( “ [ A ] di s tr i c tc ourtc a nnotdi s m i s s a n i n f orm apaupe r i s pr i s one r ’ s c a s e ba s e d on hi s f a i l ur e t o pa ythe i ni t i a l f e e w he n hi s f

a i l ur e t o pa yi s due t o l a c k of f unds a va i l abl e t o hi m w he n pa y m e nti s or de r e d. ” ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd f o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s . V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5192] 

Pursuant to section 451 of the Foreign Assistance Act of l961, as amended (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2261) and section 1-100 of Executive Order 12163, as amended, I hereby authorize, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the use of up to $2,561,508 in fiscal year 2004 funds made available under chapter 3 of part I of the Act, up to $6,938,492 in FY 2004 and FY 2005 funds made available under chapter 4 of part II of the Act, and up to $500,000 in FY 2005 funds made available under chapter 9 of part II of the Act, in order to provide assistance authorized by part I of the Act for a contribution to the United Nations Democracy Fund. This Determination supersedes and replaces the Determination of July 27, 2005, on Provision of Assistance to United Nations Democracy Fund. 

                    This Determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly, and shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

      ( print page 55658)    
Dated: September 10, 2005. 

Condoleezza Rice, 

Secretary of State, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-18967 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-37-P
ADAMS et al. v. BAXTER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC et al.

S17A1023

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: October 16, 2017

**PER CURIAM**.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Judgment affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Terry Onassis NEWBILL

No. COA16-1163

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TAYLOR M. SHARPE,

Petitioner

v.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent

______________________ 

2015-3143

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DA-0752-14-0034-I-1.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JEFFREY G. LETTS, Trenton, NJ, argued for petitioner.

CORINNE ANNE NIOSI, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented 

by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 14, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-20-00330-CV 

 

LAKESHIA WELLS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE BARATANG IRREVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

 Bell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 90,834, Honorable Jeanne Parker, Presiding 

April 9, 2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, LaKeshia Wells, appeals from the trial court’s Final Judgment.

1 Wells’s

brief was originally due March 8, 2021, but was not filed. By letter of March 15, 2021, we 

notified Wells that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, without 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West 2013).
2

further notice, if a brief was not received by March 25. To date, Wells has not filed a brief 

or had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Per Curiam
RME MANAGEMENT, LLC v. CHAPEL H.O.M. ASSOCIATES, LLC and Chapel Hill Motel Enterprises, Inc.

No. 61P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Patricia P. Shields, Attorney at Law, James R. Baker, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for RME Management, LLC.

D. Kyle Deak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Ashley H. Story, Attorney at Law, for Chapel H.O.M. Associates, LLC, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of February 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."