alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Raj DHAR, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

No. ED 83120.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Raj Dhar, Ballwin, MO, pro se.

Ronald Joe Miller, Larry Raymond Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for Division of Employment Security,

SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Chief Judge.

Raj Dhar (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) regarding her unemployment benefits. Because we find Claimant’s notice of appeal untimely, we dismiss her appeal.

Claimant filed a claim for unemployment benefits. A deputy determined she was an insured worker for purposes of unemployment, but concluded her benefit year began on February 9, 2003. Claimant appealed to the Appeals Tribunal, because she sought unemployment benefits from December 29, 2002 until January 14, 2003. The Appeals Tribunal dismissed her appeal after she failed to respond to a notice for a telephone hearing. Claimant filed a timely application for review with the Commission, which affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal. Claimant now appeals to this Court. The Division of Employment Security (Division) filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of a timely notice of appeal. Claimant has failed to file a response.

Section 288.2101 provides an aggrieved party twenty days to appeal the Commission’s decision after it becomes final. The Commission’s decision becomes final ten days after the date it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2. Here, the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on May 22, 2003. The Commission’s decision became final ten days later and the notice of appeal was due Monday, June 23, 2003. Section 288.210; Section 288.240. Claimant’s notice of appeal was filed with the Commission by facsimile as allowed by 8 C.S.R. 20-2.010(5) on June 26, 2003, and was untimely.

In employment security cases, an untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. *Poole v. Adecco North America L.L.C.,.*93 S.W.3d 850 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). Furthermore, the procedures outlined for appeal by statute in unemployment security cases are mandatory. *Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec.,*945 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). Neither Section 288.200 nor Section 288.210 provides a mechanism for *695seeking a special order to file a late notice of appeal. *Poole,*93 S.W.3d at 850; *McCuin Phillips v. Chan-Tech,*34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2000).

The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ., concur.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.
# Official Journal L 149/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 149 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 597 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 149

English edition

Legislation

Volume 597 June 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2016/888 of 6 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/323 on the financial regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund as regards payment of the instalments | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/889 of 6 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/890 of 6 June 2016 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2016/888 of 6 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/323 on the financial regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund as regards payment of the instalments

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/889 of 6 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/890 of 6 June 2016 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2009205EN.01003301.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — DSV Road v Commission

(Case T-219/07) (1)

1

(Customs union - Importation of diskettes originating in Thailand - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for remission of import duties - Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92)

2009/C 205/58

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DSV Road NV (Puurs, Belgium) (represented by: A. Poelmans, A. Calewaert and R. de Wit, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and S. Schønberg, Agents, assisted by F. Tuytschaever, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 24 April 2007 informing the Belgian authorities that they may proceed with post-clearance recovery of import duties on diskettes originating in Thailand and that there are no grounds for granting remission of those duties (file reference REC 05/02).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders DSV Road NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DSV Road NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3285 JOSEPH P. CARSON,

Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in consolidated cases AT1221960948-C-7, AT1221980250-C-7, and ATT1221980623-C-7. ON MOTION Before MOORE, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Department of Energy moves for leave to file a corrected brief. Joseph P. Carson moves for an extension of time to file his reply brief and moves to strike portions of the agency's revised brief that he asserts are irrelevant. In the alternative, Carson opposes the agency's motion for leave to file a corrected brief. The Department opposes Carson's motion to strike. Carson moves for leave to file a surreply. The Department opposes. Carson replies. We deem the better course is for Carson to put any arguments concerning the agency's brief in his reply brief. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The Department of Energy's motion is granted.Carson's motion to strike is denied. Carson's motion for an extension of time is granted. Carson's reply brief is due within 14 days of the filing of this order. (4) Carson's motion for leave to file a surreply is denied. FOR THE COURT



### MAR 19

## 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Joseph P. Carson Roger A. Hipp, Esq. MAR 1 9 2009 s20 ihiv iL4ii-1 acid( Date

2008-3285 2
STATE v. Melvin Leroy FOWLER

173P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 5, 2017

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Fowler, Melvin Leroy.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of June 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of June 2017."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4226 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4226

 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 
  non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 
             member business loan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2014

Mr. Royce (for himself and Mr. Huffman) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 
  non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 
             member business loan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Union Residential Loan Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF A NON-OWNER OCCUPIED 1- TO 4-FAMILY DWELLING.

    (a) Removal From Member Business Loan Limitation.--Section 
107A(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 
1757a(c)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ``that is the primary 
residence of a member''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or the amendment 
made by this Act shall preclude the National Credit Union 
Administration from treating an extension of credit that is fully 
secured by a lien on a 1- to 4-family dwelling that is not the primary 
residence of a member as a member business loan for purposes other than 
the member business loan limitation requirements under section 107A of 
the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Mark
Gustafson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
October 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
              
              /s/    MARK
      GUSTAFSONDate:
      November 23, 2009
              
              Name:
              
              Mark
      GustafsonTitle:
              
              Chief Executive Officer




I, Shaun
Toker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Triangle Petroleum Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Triangle Petroleum
Corporation.




By:
              
              /s/    SHAUN
      TOKERDate:
      November 23, 2009
              
              Name:
              
              Shaun
      TokerTitle:
              
              Chief
      Financial Officer
----

(2004/C 84 E/0020)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2302/03

by Miguel Martínez Martínez (PSE) to the Council

(8 July 2003)

Subject:   Murder of the young Spanish voluntary worker Ana Isabel Sánchez Torralba in Equatorial Guinea

Voluntary workers in Equatorial Guinea have now confirmed the sad news of the death of a young Spanish woman in that country, who was killed in dramatic circumstances by Equatorial Guinean soldiers. Ana Isabel Sánchez Torralba was 22 years old, came from Ocaña in Castilla-La Mancha and had been in Africa for only a few days generously contributing to the solidarity-based work of the Escolapian Missionaries. She was travelling towards the town of Aconibe in a civilian bus with other citizens and a couple of fellow missionaries when the vehicle was inexplicably shot at by members of the country's armed forces on passing a checkpoint, with fatal consequences.

This serious incident leads me, as a citizen of the same country as the young murder victim who shares the grief and indignation of her family and friends, to put the following questions to the Council for written answer:

Reply

(8 March 2004)

The Council takes note of the information concerning the murder of the Spanish citizen Ana Isabel Sánchez Torralba in Equatorial Guinea. The Council regrets all acts of violence and crimes; these should be addressed not only in relation to events affecting EU citizens, but also in general terms.

The EU is deeply concerned at the deterioration in the internal political situation in Equatorial Guinea as regards human rights and the democratisation process. Following last year's elections (December 2002) the EU expressed its concern at the political development of the country and in particular at the increase in violations of human rights. The EU urged the government and the political opposition to hold an all-inclusive political dialogue on the process of democratisation and on the establishment of guarantees for respect of human rights. It will continue to do so and will pursue any relevant action within the framework of its contacts with the competent authorities to prevent and clear up situations such as the one described by the Honourable Member in his question.

----
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-08-229-CV

DOMINICK J. MARSALA APPELLANT

V.

J.E. “ED” BROWNLEE APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

On September 2, 2008, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record

and provided this court with proof of payment. 
2

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for

want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

 

DELIVERED: September 25, 2008
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.04

                                        
                              RED ROOF INNS, INC.
                                        
                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                      FOR
                         ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
                               FORMS 3, 4, AND 5




The undersigned director of Red Roof Inns, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and appoints Francis W. Cash, David L. Rea,
and Alan L. Tallis, collectively and individually, as his agents and
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to (a)
sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on his behalf and in his name,
place, and stead in any and all capacities with respect to the registration
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), including pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; (b) sign and file any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K; (c) sign and
file any and all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") covered by the Form 10-K; (d) sign
and file any or all Forms 3, 4, or 5 required to be filed by him with the
Commission under the Act, including pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act; (e)
sign and file any and all amendments to Forms 3, 4, or 5; and (f) do and perform
any and all other acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required;
and (2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant
hereto by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their
substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 25th day of February, 1999.



                                                   /s/ William M. Lewis, Jr.
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   William M. Lewis, Jr.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4126 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4126

To authorize the construction of the expansion of San Luis Reservoir in 
                              California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2014

 Mr. Costa (for himself, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Farr, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Bera 
 of California, and Mr. Cardenas) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the construction of the expansion of San Luis Reservoir in 
                              California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Luis Reservoir Expansion Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. SAN LUIS RESERVOIR EXPANSION.

    Section 103(f) of Title I of Public Law 108-361 (the Calfed Bay-
Delta Authorization Act, 118 Stat. 1681) is amended by--
     (a) Striking subparagraph (1) and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Conveyance and expansion.--The amounts authorized to 
        be appropriated under section 109 may be expended for the 
        following.''
    (b) Inserting ``including the increase of storage capacity at San 
Luis Reservoir,'' after ``improvement project,''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 3/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 506 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 506 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 003/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 003/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE v. Antwan ANTHONY

324A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 20, 2017

Kathryn VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, Jonathan E. Broun, Attorney at Law, Durham, Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Attorney at Law, for Anthony, Antwan.

Kimberly Robb, Assistant District Attorney, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of April 2017 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Trial Transcript:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of April 2017."

Court reporter shall have up to and including the 22nd day of May 2017 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel.
EX-10.97



 Exhibit 10.97 

Amendment Number 1 to the 

GECFS Inc./GE Capital Consumer Card Co. 

Revolving Credit Agreement 
 This Amendment
Number 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated March 18, 1996, between GECFS Inc. (Card Services) and GE Capital Consumer Card Co. is made as of October 6, 1997. 

The parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: The Agreement is amended to provide that the commitment (as defined in the Agreement) is changed
from US$3,500,000,000 to US$6,500,000,000. 
 DATED: October 6, 1997 

 

			
	 GE CAPITAL CONSUMER CARD CO.,
as Borrower

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank P. Dimas

	Name:	 	Frank P. Dimas
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	 GECFS, Inc. (Card Services),
as Lender

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Deborah S. Gallagher

	Name:	 	Deborah S. Gallagher
	Title:	 	Vice President and Treasurer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4183 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 

maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2014 

Mr. TIERNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States 

to set the maximum annual percentage rates applicable 

to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering States’ 

5 Rights To Protect Consumers Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

7 Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4183 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 140B. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the an3 nual percentage rate applicable to any consumer credit 

4 transaction (other than a residential mortgage trans5 action), including any fees associated with such a trans6 action, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by 

7 the laws of the State in which the consumer resides.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS