alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00273-CR

NO. 03-08-00274-CR

NO. 03-08-00275-CR

Larry Allen Morgan Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. CR21981, CR21982 & CR21983, HONORABLE ED MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In three cases consolidated for trial, Larry Allen Morgan, Jr., pleaded guilty to the

offenses of aggravated sexual assault of a child, indecency with a child by contact, and indecency

with a child by exposure. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (West 2003), § 22.021(a)(1)(B)

(West Supp. 2008). Punishment was before a jury. In cause number CR21981, punishment was

assessed at 20 years’ imprisonment for count I (aggravated sexual assault of a child) and 20 years’

imprisonment for count II (aggravated sexual assault of a child). In cause number CR21982,

punishment was assessed at five years’ imprisonment for count I (indecency with a child by

exposure) and 15 years’ imprisonment for count II (indecency with a child by contact). In cause

number CR21983, punishment was assessed at five years’ imprisonment for the offense of indecency

with a child by exposure.
2

For each cause, appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw

and a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s

briefs and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No

pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs and agree that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

Counsel’s motions to withdraw are granted.

After counsel filed his Anders briefs, we received from Morgan a motion for

appointment of new counsel. Having independently determined that appellant’s appeal is indeed

frivolous, appellant’s motion for appointment of new counsel is overruled. See Penson, 488 U.S.

at 80; see also Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (concluding that an

indigent defendant must be afforded new counsel if the appellate court finds arguments meritorious).

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
3

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: October 17, 2008

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT (32)

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned, the
President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of LaCrosse Footwear Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies, based on his knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Joseph P. Schneider           
|----------------------------------
|Joseph P. Schneider
March 19, 2004

|/s/ David P. Carlson           
|-------------------------------
|David P. Carlson
March 19, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**J. ROE BUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the“Registrant”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
STATE of North Carolina v. Keyshawn JONES.

No. 27PA16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jones, Keyshawn.

Rajeev K. Premakumar, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 25th of January 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> *467"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of January 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                   [CLARK, SCHAEFER, HACKETT & CO. LETTERHEAD]



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-97586 and 33-97588) of Western Ohio Financial
Corporation (the "Company") of our report dated January 23, 1998, on the 1997
consolidated financial statements of the Company, which report is included in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.


Springfield, Ohio
March 26, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      33,879,608              36,288,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,254                 119,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,150,795              36,533,913
<PP&E>                                       3,701,648               2,490,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                 821,476                 582,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,715,900              38,672,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,573,625                 543,167
<BONDS>                                      1,298,484               1,275,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        92,757                  92,699
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,751,034              36,761,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,715,900              38,672,589
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,919,955               6,807,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,959                 148,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,083,432)             (6,117,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,083,432)             (6,117,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,083,432)             (6,117,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($1.86)                 ($1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.86)                 ($1.79)


</TABLE>
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 0 421 LT Case No. 1 9 -CA- 007384

_____________________________ B RUCE E DWARD M C C RAY , J R ., Appella nt,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Robert M. Foster, Judge. Matthew J. Metz,, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Talla hassee, and D avid Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. February 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
. W ALLIS , L AMBERT , and P RATT , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
DAVIS v. HULSING ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al.

160A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 2016

Charles G. Monnett, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Davis, Thomas A.E. (Jr.), et al.

*216Isaac N. Northup, Jr., Attorney at Law, Katherine M. Pomroy, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Katherine Marie Bulfer, Attorney at Law, For Hulsing Hotels North Carolina, Inc., et al.

Isaac Northup, Attorney at Law.

Lori P. Jones, Attorney at Law, R. Frank Gray, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Restaurant and Lodging Association.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of September 2016 by NC Restaurant and Lodging Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of September 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00572-CV

CITY OF DEL RIO, TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

PICO AVIATION, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27157

Honorable Carl Pendergrass, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 8, 2008

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion indicating that the parties have fully resolved and settled all

issues in dispute. Because the parties have reached a final settlement of all issues raised in this

appeal, appellant asks that we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant’s

motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. The parties have agreed that each party

will bear its own costs; therefore, costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

See id. at (d). 

PER CURIAM
NO. 12-08-00363-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT KASSUBE, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of evading arrest, a third degree felony. The trial

court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for ten years. We have received the trial court’s

certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The

certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. The clerk’s record supports the trial court’s

certification. See Greenwell v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered October 8, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
ELI GLOBAL, LLC, et al. v. HEAVNER

12PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 18, 2017

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Kendal B. Reed, Attorney at Law, for Eli Global, LLC, et al.

James H. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Richard M. Hutson, II, Attorney at Law, Durham, Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for Heavner, James A.

Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, Timothy Nelson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Association of Broadcasters, et al.

*58Stuart M. Paynter, Attorney at Law, Celeste H. G. Boyd, Attorney at Law, Hillsborough, for Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of May 2017 by the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters and the North Carolina Press Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of May 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
**Exhibit23.2**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-137137,333-124493, 333-117316, 333-109189, 333-99399, 333-82592, 333-45643, 333-86697,333-86719 and 333-20387 on Forms S-8 of our report dated April 17, 2006 (April2, 2007 as to the effects of the reverse stock split described in Note 1),relating to the financial statements of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the“Company”), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metro OneTelecommunications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 (whichreport includes an explanatory paragraph because of the Company’s recurringlosses from operations and loss of significant customers which raisesubstantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern).

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, OregonApril 2, 2007

 

----
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion March 8, filed 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 00540

- CV

____________ REED & ABRASLEY, P.L.L.C., ROBERT S. ABRASLEY, JOEL D. REED AND

ROBERT S. ABRASLEY, P.C

. , Appellant s

V.

MICHAEL G. SHEBAY AND ANDREW SHEBAY & CO., P.L.L.C

. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 65369



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 24, 2011 . On February 24, 2012
, the parties filed a n agreed motion to dismiss the appeal in order to effectuate a compromise and settlement agreement

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

The motion is granted

. Accordingly, the appeal is o rdered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.
HARRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

110A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2017

Tamika L. Henderson, Assistant Attorney Geneal, for N.C. Department Of Public Safety.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, for Harris, Steven.

Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, E. Hardy Lewis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fraternal Order of Police, et al.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of August 2017 by Southern States Police Benevolent Association and the N.C. Police Benevolent Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3996 

To prohibit the closure or reduced operation of military commissary stores 

and exchange stores before January 1, 2017. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2014 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. MILLER of 

Michigan, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. LONG, 

Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. YODER, Mr. GARAMENDI, and 

Mr. YOHO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the closure or reduced operation of military commissary stores and exchange stores before January 1, 

2017. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save our Military 

5 Shopping Benefits Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3996 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CLOSURE OR REDUCED OPER2 ATION OF COMMISSARY STORES AND EX3 CHANGE STORES. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding subsections (c) 

5 and (d) of section 2482 of title 10, United States Code, 

6 or any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense 

7 may not— 

8 (1) close any commissary store or exchange 

9 store located within the United States; or 

10 (2) develop or implement any plan that would 

11 result in the closure of all commissaries located in 

12 the United States as part of a cost-saving effort. 

13 (b) DEFINITION OF CLOSE.—In this section, the term 

14 ‘‘close’’ includes any action that has the effect of— 

15 (1) reducing the operating hours or size of a 

16 commissary store or exchange store below fiscal year 

17 2014 levels; or 

18 (2) changing the location of a commissary store 

19 or exchange store. 

20 (c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply to a 

21 change in the size or location of a commissary store or 

22 exchange store if the Secretary of Defense determines that 

23 the change is required for upgrading or modifying an ex24 isting structure for safety or health reasons. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3996 IH

1 (d) DURATION.—The prohibition imposed by sub2 section (a) expires January 1, 2017. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 23, 2008
In re: Forclosure of: Maine

226P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Betty Farmer Maine, For Maine, Betty Farmer, et al.

W. Chris Parnell, Attorney at Law, For Morrison Trustee Services, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of June 2016 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE ORDER

The Honorable John W. Parker, Judge of the District Court for the Eighth Judicial

District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District Judge Mike

Salvagni to assume jurisdiction of Cascade County Cause Nos. DDI 21-010, Matter of

Ekoue E. Abalo, and ADR-16-099, Juan Anastasio Rodriguez v. Sharlee Joy Rodriguez.

Judge Parker also requests assistance with the Eighth Judicial District Adult Drug

Treatment Court on June 30, 2021.

Judge Salvagni has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' Retirement

System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has

advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Eighth Judicial District Court with the

above-listed matters.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Honorable Mike Salvagni, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active

service in the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District of the State of Montana, to

assume judicial authority of Cascade County Cause Nos. DDI 21-010, Matter of Ekoue E.

Abalo, and ADR-16-099, Juan Anastasio Rodriguez v. Sharlee Joy Rodriguez, and to

preside over the Eighth Judicial District Adult Drug Treatment Court on June 30, 2021.

Judge Salvagni is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings,

opinions, and orders, including final resolution of said matters.

2. For all active service, Judge Salvagni shall be paid the salary compensation to

which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be

reimbursed.
This Order is entered by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of

the 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in

implementation thereof.L4.

DATED this Z-E-day of June, 2021.

Chief Justice

2
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick D. BOGER

No. 158P06-13

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Derrick D. Boger, for Boger, Derrick D.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th of May 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cabarrus County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of May 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cabarrus County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."