# CE2004084EN.01004701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/47

---

(2004/C 84 E/0052)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3050/03

by Koenraad Dillen (NI) to the Council

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   European Court of Human Rights judgment against Turkey

Subject:

On 31 July 2003, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg delivered a second judgment against Turkey for violation of human rights in Cyprus. The judgment on violation of the right to respect for the home followed on from an application by two Greek Cypriots, Eugenia Michaelidou and Michael Tymvios, who have been unable to travel to their home since Turkey unlawfully occupied Northern Cyprus. According to the Court, this is a manifest violation of Article 1 of Protocol No 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Turkey has been admitted to attend the current IGC in Rome as an observer and candidate country.

Does the Council consider it reasonable for a candidate country which manifestly and repeatedly violates the principles of the ECHR to be admitted to the IGC as an observer? Does not the IGC, which, it should be noted, is discussing the incorporation of citizens' basic rights into the European Constitution, lose democratic legitimacy by allowing a state which violates human rights to be an observer?

How will the Council make sure that, during accession negotiations in subsequent years, Turkey does not simply pay lip service to human rights compliance, but, rather, is actually guided by it in politics?

Will the Council put pressure on Turkey to ensure, in response to this specific judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, that the judgments do not remain a dead letter?

In other words, will the Council put pressure on Turkey to restore the rights of Eugenia Michaelidou and Michael Tymvios?

Reply

(8 March 2004)

(8 March 2004)

| 1. | As pointed out by the Honourable Member and also noted in the Commission's regular report 2003 on Turkey's progress towards accession, Turkey still has a problematic record with regard to execution of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The regular report 2003 indicates that the ECtHR since October 2002 has delivered 92 judgements concerning Turkey, and that in 43 cases the Court found that Turkey had violated the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). |
| --- | --- |

1.

As pointed out by the Honourable Member and also noted in the Commission's regular report 2003 on Turkey's progress towards accession, Turkey still has a problematic record with regard to execution of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The regular report 2003 indicates that the ECtHR since October 2002 has delivered 92 judgements concerning Turkey, and that in 43 cases the Court found that Turkey had violated the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).

| 2. | The Council expects all countries aspiring to EU membership to respect international law and their treaty obligations, in particular in the field of human rights. This is reflected in the revised Turkey accession partnership by the relevant priority which requests Turkey to ‘comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including respect of the judgements of the ECtHR’. The Council raises this point with Turkey on any suitable occasion, in particular in the context of political dialogue. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council expects all countries aspiring to EU membership to respect international law and their treaty obligations, in particular in the field of human rights. This is reflected in the revised Turkey accession partnership by the relevant priority which requests Turkey to ‘comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including respect of the judgements of the ECtHR’. The Council raises this point with Turkey on any suitable occasion, in particular in the context of political dialogue.

| 3. | Specific action in respect of the judgement referred to by the Honourable Member is not being considered at this stage. It should be recalled that, as decided by the Copenhagen European Council, accession negotiations with Turkey will be opened if the European Council in December 2004 decides that Turkey fulfils the Copenhagen political criteria, which require in particular that democracy, the rule of law and human rights are guaranteed in the country. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Specific action in respect of the judgement referred to by the Honourable Member is not being considered at this stage. It should be recalled that, as decided by the Copenhagen European Council, accession negotiations with Turkey will be opened if the European Council in December 2004 decides that Turkey fulfils the Copenhagen political criteria, which require in particular that democracy, the rule of law and human rights are guaranteed in the country.

| 4. | Finally, it is not for the Council to comment on the Thessaloniki European Council's decision to admit Turkey as an observer to the IGC. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Finally, it is not for the Council to comment on the Thessaloniki European Council's decision to admit Turkey as an observer to the IGC.

---