alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7975-5]


Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Town of 
Tilton and Tilton/Northfield Fire Department, Old Pillsbury Mill 
Superfund Site, Tilton, NH

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past costs concerning the Old 
Pillsbury Mill Superfund Site in Tilton, New Hampshire with the 
following settling parties: Town of Tilton and the Tilton/Northfield 
Fire Department. The settlement requires the settling parties to pay 
$378,706.00 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The settlement 
includes a covenant not to sue the settling parties pursuant to section 
107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a). For thirty (30) days 
following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will 
receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will 
consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent 
to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations 
which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or 
inadequate.
    The Agency's response to any comments received will be available 
for public inspection at One Congress Street, Boston, MA 02214-2023 
(Telephone No. 617-918-1440).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 27, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Audrey Zucker, Enforcement 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress 
Street, Suite 1100 (SES), Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023 (Telephone 
No. 617-918-1778) and should refer to: In re: Old Pillsbury Mill 
Superfund Site, U.S. EPA Docket No. 01-2005-0016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the proposed settlement may 
be obtained from Audrey Zucker, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region I, Office of Environmental Stewardship, One Congress Street, 
Suite 1100 (SES), Boston, MA 02114-2023 (Telephone No. 617-918-1778; E-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#275d52444c42550946524355425e6742574609404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e79d92848c8295c986928395829ea7829786c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
Susan Studlien,
Director, Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 05-19262 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CE2004078EN.01075601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/756 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/756

---

(2004/C 78 E/0803)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2767/03

by Dana Scallon (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Subject:   NGO funding

Subject:

Can the EU Commission fund organisations which support or participate in the management of a programme of coercive abortion?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(15 October 2003)

(15 October 2003)

The Commission's policy on abortion is based on a set of principles adopted through a series of major development conferences over recent years, including the 1994 Cairo International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) and ICPD plus five. All 15 Member States of the Union have endorsed the ICPD Programme of Action.

Accordingly the Commission supports the right of men and women to make a free and informed choice about the number and spacing of their children, to have access to good family planning and sexual health services, and to have access to skilled care during birth.

The Commission regards national legislation as paramount when it comes to the question of abortion being performed within the formal health care system. It does not support abortion policies as a means to limit population growth in developing countries and it is strongly opposed to forced abortion.

The Union has recently adopted a Regulation (EC) No 1567/2003 of the Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003, on aid for policies and actions on reproductive and sexual health and rights in developing countries (1). This regulation provides the basis for financing projects in developing countries. In selecting the beneficiaries for Community funding open tendering procedures are applied. The Commission considers the activity for which the funds were authorised, not the whole range of activities carried out by the beneficiary organisation.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 224, 6.9.2003.

1

---
#### In the Interest of B.A.S., Plaintiff, Division of Family Services, Respondent, v. N.S. (Father), Appellant.

No. WD 62403.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Katherine J. Rodgers, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff.

Peter A. Raith, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Gary L. Gardner, Jefferson City, MO and Kimberly A. Carrington, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.

JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

N.S. (Father) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to B.A.S. under section 211.447, RSMo 2000. Father raises two points on appeal. First, he claims that the statutory ground under which the trial court terminated his parental rights, section 211.447.2(1) violates the Due Process Clauses of the federal and state constitutions. Second, Father claims that the trial court abused its discretion in terminating his parental rights because insufficient evidence was presented to support the trial court’s findings that termination was in the best interest of the child. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERNANDO ARAUJO-FLORES, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 13-71186 Agency No. A074-305-403
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted April 9, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: TALLMAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, District Judge. ** Fernando Araujo-Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order affirming the Immigration Judge’s finding that he was removable as a controlled substances offender. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i). We deny the petition for review. 

# FILED
APR 21 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.Araujo-Flores was convicted for viola tions of California Health & Safety Code § 11550(a). That statute criminalizes being under the influence of a specified and finite list of substances (a subset of California’s controlled substances schedules), which are set out in the disj unctive. A plain reading of the statute therefore reveals that it “list[s] potentia l offense elements in the alternative.” Descamps v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2276, 2283 (2013); see also Coronado v. Holder , No. 11-72121, 2014 WL 983621, at *4 (9th Cir. Mar. 14, 2014) (holding a drug possession statute containing language virtually identical to the drug intoxication statute at issue here to be divisible). As such, the statute under which Araujo-Flores was convicted is divisible, and we can therefore apply the modified categorical approach. 1 The judicially noticeable documents thatform the record of Araujo-Flores’s two convictions reflect a plea of guilty to count 1, charge “HS11550(a).” The charging documents, also judicially noticeable, are single-count complaints charging Araujo-Flores in count 1 of being “under the influence of a controlled substance, to wit: methamphetamine, in violation of HEALTH AND SAFETY

1 For purposes of reaching this conclu sion, we grant Araujo-Flores’s motion to take judicial notice and take notice of the jury verdict forms from People v. Nguyen . The jury verdict forms do not and cannot change the plain meaning of the statute. 2CODE SECTION 11550(a).” Looking at the charging documents in conjunction with the plea of guilty and the court minutes memorializing the judgment, we are left with no doubt that Araujo-Flores pled guilty to being under the influence of methamphetamine. See, e.g. , United States v. Valdavinos-Torres , 704 F.3d 679, 687–88 (9th Cir. 2012). Methamphetamine is a substance controlled under the federal Controlled Substances Act. See 21 C.F.R. § 1308.12(d)(2). Accordingly, Araujo-Flores’s offense of conviction qualif ies as a controlled substances offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) and is a proper basis for his removal. PETITION DENIED.

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0649 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 13 2022

05/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0649
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56966-56967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' 
Disability Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for October 14, 
2005, in the hearing room 334 of the House Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs, at the Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515. The 
meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. The meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the 
benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to 
compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and 
deaths attributable to military service.
    The agenda for the meeting will include the opportunity to discuss 
research questions and issues for further study. The Statements of Work 
under development for contracting with the Institute of Medicine of the 
National Academies of Science, as required by the Commission's 
statutory authority, and the Center for Naval Analysis will be 
discussed and approved.

[[Page 56967]]

    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Commission. Time for oral presentations will be limited to five minutes 
or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties 
may provide written comments for review by the Commission prior the 
meeting, by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93e5f6e7f6e1f2fde0d3e5f6e7e0f0fcfefefae0e0fafcfdbdfafde7e1f2fdf6e7e0bdf0fcfe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8decddccddac9c6dbe8decddcdbcbc7c5c5c1dbdbc1c7c686c1c6dcdac9c6cddcdb86cbc7c5">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail 
to: Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits 
Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 
20004.

    Dated: September 22, 2005.

    By direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19522 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MakeMusic! Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Philip Sean Lafleur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 26, 2004 | /s/PHILIP SEAN LAFLEURPhilip Sean Lafleur
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
23.2
 
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-145764, 333-138461, 333-109709, 333-97521, 333-63798,
333-35114, 333-62619, and 333-14057) and on Form-3 (333-125640) of our reports
dated February 22, 2008 and March 26, 2007 relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the effectiveness of BroadVision, Inc.¡¦s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
    /s/
ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP
  San
Francisco, California
 February
19, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT ROBERT A. BURNES, JD, MLS,

Appellant,
v. KIMBERLY BURNES and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Appellees. No. 2D22-4103 September 1, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Rebecca Hamilton, Judge. Robert Alexander Burnes JD, MLS, pro se. Brandon S. Vesely of The Florida Appellate Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee, Kimberly Burnes. Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Toni C. Bernstein, Sr. Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of Revenue. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, LUCAS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication 

### .
Exhibit 12.1
                               General Media, Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earning to Fixed Charges
                             Year Ended December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1992           1993           1994           1995           1996
                                           ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations,
   before income taxes                     $ 11,622,000   $ 14,318,000   $  3,377,000   ($10,127,000)  ($   202,000)
                                           ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

Adjustments to income (loss)
   Interest expense                           3,674,000      3,027,000     10,474,000     10,302,000      9,907,000
   Interest income                              (55,000)       (80,000)      (564,000)      (541,000)      (319,000)
   Interest expense in rental charges           781,000        608,000         87,000        689,000        789,000
                                           ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

Adjusted income (loss)                     $ 16,022,000   $ 17,873,000   $ 13,374,000   $    323,000   $ 10,175,000
                                           ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Fixed charges
   Interest expense                        $  3,674,000   $  3,027,000   $ 10,474,000   $ 10,302,000   $  9,907,000
   Interest expense in rental charges           781,000        608,000         87,000        689,000        789,000
                                           ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

Total fixed charges                        $  4,455,000   $  3,635,000   $ 10,561,000   $ 10,991,000   $ 10,696,000
                                           ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.6            4.9            1.3            0.0            1.0
                                           ============   ============   ============   ============   ============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. McClure, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(3) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: November 10, 2008



/s/ Michael J.
McClureMichael J. McClureExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COLUMBUS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. NORTON

249P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 2, 2017

Calvin T. Norton, for Norton, Calvin T.

David S. Tedder, Assistant County Attorney, for Columbus County Dept. of Social Services (Ex. Rel.), et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of July 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of August 2017."
# C_2009282EN.01004202.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/42

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009 — France v Commission

(Case T-432/07) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Fruit and vegetables - Conditions for recognition of producers’ organisations)

2009/C 282/79

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, A.L. During, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/647/EC of 3 October 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2007 L 261, p. 28), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the French Republic for producers’ organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.01.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4331 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4331

 To require a 50 percent reduction in the number of limousines in the 
                             Federal fleet.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2014

Mr. Barrow of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a 50 percent reduction in the number of limousines in the 
                             Federal fleet.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN LIMOUSINES IN FEDERAL FLEET.

    (a) Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law and 
except as provided in subsection (b), for fiscal year 2015 and each 
fiscal year thereafter, the number of limousines in the Federal fleet 
shall not exceed 50 percent of the number of limousines in the Federal 
fleet as of the last day of fiscal year 2014.
    (b) Exception for National Security.--Subsection (a) shall not 
apply with respect to any limousine determined by the President to be 
essential for reasons of national security.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gail B.
Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                By: /s/  GAIL B. COOPER
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Gail B. Cooper
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    March 28, 2003