alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Michael V. Mecca,as President and Chief Executive Officer of BH/RE, L.L.C., a Nevada limitedliability company (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(A)  the accompanying Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)  the information in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 15, 2006 |                                                                  |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                  |
|                          |                                                                  |
|                          | /S/ Michael V. Mecca                                                  |
|                          | Michael V. Mecca                                                      |
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----
# C_2008327EN.01004103.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-126/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 327/74)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1836

ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

ALBERT LOWRY,Personally and in his capacity as: Leader agent 

for EAI and ES; ENTREPRENEURIAL SYSTEMS, LLC, and/or its 

successor(s) and assigns; EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT INSTITUTE, 

personally and in his official capacities; ADAM LEVINE, 

Esq., personally and in his official capacities Agent for 

Lowry, EAI and ES; SETH BERENZWEIG, Esq., personally and in 

his official capacity as Agent(s) for Lowry, EAI and ES; 

SARAH ZAFFINA, Esq., personally and in her official capacity 

as: Agent for Lowry, EAI and ES; DOUGLAS HERNDON, Judge; 

DENIS SMITH, Judge, In his personal and official capacities, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:08-cv-00394-JRS) 

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
2 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: 

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Fiorani v. Lowry, No. 3:08-cv-00394-JRS (E.D. Va., 

July 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Anthony DOVE v. Faye E. DANIELS, Superintendent of Pamlico Corrections

No. 131P01-14

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 25, 2017

*639Anthony Dove, for Dove, Anthony.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 24th of July 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Lenoir County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of July 2017."
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
       Statements of HemaSure Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79720,
       33-79722, 33-79772, 33-94772, 33-94768, 333-05613 and 333-05615) of our
       report dated February 4, 2000 except for Note Q for which the date is
       March 2, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
       this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



       Boston, Massachusetts
       March 30, 2000
# C_2008079EN.01002304.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/23

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 20 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-65/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 79/42)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---
# C_2008301EN.01001101.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság, Republic of Hungary) — Criminal proceedings brought by Győrgy Katz against István Roland Sós

(Case C-404/07) (1)

1

(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA - Standing of victims in criminal proceedings - Private prosecutor in substitution for the public prosecutor - Testimony of the victim as a witness)

(2008/C 301/20)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties in the criminal proceedings

Győrgy Katz against István Roland Sós

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíróság — Interpretation of Articles 2 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 1) — National legislation precluding the possibility of the victim giving evidence in criminal proceedings instituted by the victim as a substitute private prosecutor

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings are to be interpreted as not obliging a national court to permit the victim to be heard as a witness in criminal proceedings instituted by a substitute private prosecution such as that in issue in the main proceedings. However, in the absence of such a possibility, it must be possible for the victim to be permitted to give testimony which can be taken into account as evidence.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
WILEY, et al. v. L3 COMMUNICATIONS VERTEX AEREOSPACE, LLC

29P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Garris Neil Yarborough, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, H. Addison Winters, Attorney at Law, M. Nan Alessandra, Attorney at Law, Robert M. Kennedy, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for L3 Communications Vertex Aereospace, LLC.

Lee Tart Malone, Attorney at Law, Dunn, Robert A. Buzzard, Attorney at Law, Lillington, Ryan McKaig, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Wiley, Harry A., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of February 2017 by M. Nan Alessandra for admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
In the MATTER OF: B.W.S. & A.N.S.

No. COA16-850

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Myron Roderick NUNN

63P10-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Myron Roderick Nunn, For Nunn, Myron Roderick.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of August 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
# C_2006237EN.01001201.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/12

---

Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Lucite International and Lucite International UK v Commission

(Case T-216/06)

(2006/C 237/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Lucite International Ltd (Hampshire, United Kingdom) and Lucite International UK Ltd (Lancashire, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Thompson, QC, and S. Rose, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Article 2(d) of Decision COMP/F/38.645; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Article 2(d) of Decision COMP/F/38.645;

| — | the replacement of the fine imposed under Article 2(d) of Decision [COMP/F/38.645] by a fine of EUR 18,268,750 or such other lower amount as the Court may consider appropriate; and |
| --- | --- |

—

the replacement of the fine imposed under Article 2(d) of Decision [COMP/F/38.645] by a fine of EUR 18,268,750 or such other lower amount as the Court may consider appropriate; and

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of this application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek the partial annulment of the Commission's Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 in Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates, by which the Commission found that the applicants had infringed Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by participating in a methacrylates cartel which consisted of discussing prices, agreeing, implementing and monitoring price agreements either in form of price increases, or at least stabilisation of existing price levels, discussing the passing on of additional service costs to customers, exchange of commercially important and confidential market and/or company relevant information and participating in regular meetings and other contacts to facilitate the infringement.

In support of their application, the applicants submit that the Commission applied its guidelines on the method of setting fines incorrectly when calculating the fine imposed on the applicants.

First of all, the Commission failed to take account of the nature of the applicant's involvement and the extent of their role in undermining the cartel when setting the starting amount of the fine.

Secondly, the Commission did not give proper consideration to the attenuating circumstances applicable to the applicants.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7602

LONNELL DAVID SLIGH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1218-WMN) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lonnell David Sligh, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Jason Trumpbour, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lonnell David Sligh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sligh v. Conroy , No. CA-99-1218-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-10.102



 Exhibit 10.102 
  

			
	



	  	 GE Capital Corporation


 March 20, 2013 
 GE Capital
Retail Bank 
 170 West Election Road 
 Suite 125 

Draper, UT 84020 
 Attn: Margaret Keane 

Dear Ms. Keane: 
 Reference is made to (i) that certain
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 29, 1996, by and between GE Capital Consumer Card Co. and GE Capital Corporation (“GECC”) (“RCA No.1”); (ii) that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 29,
1996, by and between GE Capital Consumer Card Co. and GECC (“RCA No. 2”); (iii) that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 29, 1996, by and between GE Capital Consumer Card Co. and GECFS, Inc. (“RCA No.
3”); (iv) that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 29, 1996, by and between GE Capital Consumer Card Co. and GECFS, Inc. (“RCA No. 4”); and (v) that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 1996,
by and between Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia and GECC (“RCA No. 5”) (as each has been or may be amended, modified or restated, collectively, the “Agreements”). 

Pursuant to a certain Amendment dated October 1, 2008, each of the Agreements was amended to provide for an initial term through October 1, 2013. Under each
of the Agreements, the initial term is automatically extended for successive terms of five years each unless GECC provides GE Capital Retail Bank (“GECRB”) with notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement at least three
months prior to the end of the then-current term. 
 GECC hereby confirms that it will not exercise its right to terminate the Agreements as of the end of
the initial term on October 1, 2013. Accordingly, GECC hereby confirms that the Agreements will be automatically extended for a renewal term of five years through September 30, 2018, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms
thereof. 







 Many thanks for your assistance with this request and please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any
questions in respect to this matter. 
 Respectfully yours, 

GE CAPITAL CORPORATION 
  

			
	 /s/ Patricia Glassford

	By:	 	Patricia Glassford
	Its:	 	 Chief Financial Officer, GE
 Capital
Corporate Treasury
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0596n.06

Filed: October 2, 2008

No. 07-6429

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

QUIXX CORPORATION, UTILITY ENGINEERING

CORPORATION, and XCEL ENERGY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY 

BEFORE: BOGGS, Chief Judge, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Following an eleven-car derailment, plaintiff railway sued the repair facility that serviced its

railcar seven years prior to the accident. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of

defendants because it concluded, inter alia, that plaintiffs could not establish that defendants’ alleged

negligence proximately caused the derailment. 

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that

issuance of a panel opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. Thus, we affirm the district

court’s well-reasoned decision for the reasons stated in that court’s summary judgment opinion and

order of September 18, 2007, and its opinion and order of October 29, 2007, denying plaintiff’s

motion for reconsideration. 
No. 07-6429

Paducah & Louisville Ry., Inc. V. Quixx Corp.

- 2 -

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Juan Carlos RODRIGUEZ.

No. 302A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 26, 2016.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jennifer Martin, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Patrick B. Weede, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Michael Silver, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 26th of April 2016 by State of NC:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of April 2016."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 1st day of July 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

                             AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT

      The Agreement Regarding Initial Employment Terms, dated as of December 2,
1996, between The Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB and Fred B. Koons, as
previously amended, is hereby amended, effective as of July 24, 1997, to replace
the clause "Transfer of Control" where it appears therein with the clause
"Change in Control."

                                          AGREED AND ACCEPTED

                                          THE DIME SAVINGS BANK OF
                                           NEW YORK, FSB


                                          By: /s/ LAWRENCE J. TOAL
                                              ------------------------------

                                           /s/ FRED B. KOONS
                                          ----------------------------------
                                                FRED B. KOONS
form10q-exhibit10_a.htm


Exhibit 10(a)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 5


 


TO


 


PPL EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN







WHEREAS, PPL Services Corporation ("PPL") has adopted the PPL Officers Deferred Compensation Plan ("Plan") effective July 1, 2000; and


WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective November 1, 2003, and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1, 2, 3 and 4; and


WHEREAS, PPL desires to further amend the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 



	
I.  

	
Effective January 1, 2014, the following sections of Article 4 is amended to read:







 


Article IV


Deferred Cash Compensation and Deferred Cash Awards


 


4.11       The Account of any Participant hired on or after January 1, 2012, with Deferred Cash Compensation and Deferred Cash Awards for the calendar year shall be increased by a Matching Contribution and a Fixed Contribution.  The Matching Contribution shall be an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate Deferred Cash Compensation and Deferred Cash Awards that do not exceed 6% Cash Compensation, minus the maximum amount of Matching Contributions that could have been made to the Participant’s Accounts in the PPL Retirement Savings Plan for that calendar year if the Participant made the maximum employee contributions permitted.  The Fixed Contribution shall be an amount equal to 3% of Cash Compensation and Cash Award minus the amount of the Fixed Contribution made to the Participant’s Accounts in the PPL Retirement Savings Plan for that calendar year.


 



	
II

	
Except as provided for in this Amendment No. 5, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 5 is executed this _____ day of _____________________, 2014.


 




 


              


	  	  	
PPL SERVICES CORPORATION


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	
By:

	
 


	  	  	  	
William H. Spence


	  	  	  	
Chairman, President and CEO
# Official Journal C 152/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.152.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5630 May 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.152.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5630 May 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 152/01 | State aid — Greece — State aid SA.34308 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) — Possible State aid to Hellenic Defence Systems HDS (EAS - Ellinika Amyntika Systimata) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 152/02 | State aid — Cyprus — State aid SA.35888 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) — Rescue aid for Cyprus Airways (Public) Ltd — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 12 |
| 2013/C 152/03 | State aid — United Kingdom — State aid SA.36139 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) — UK video games tax relief — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 24 |
| 2013/C 152/04 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Compensation to Sardinian airports for Public Service Obligations (SGEI) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 30 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 152/01

State aid — Greece — State aid SA.34308 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) — Possible State aid to Hellenic Defence Systems HDS (EAS - Ellinika Amyntika Systimata) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

1

2013/C 152/02

State aid — Cyprus — State aid SA.35888 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) — Rescue aid for Cyprus Airways (Public) Ltd — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

12

2013/C 152/03

State aid — United Kingdom — State aid SA.36139 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) — UK video games tax relief — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

24

2013/C 152/04

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Compensation to Sardinian airports for Public Service Obligations (SGEI) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

30

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN