alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 00842
- CR
COURTLAND WAYNE KING, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F11
- 59371
- U 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On January 18, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the app eal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload and a recent illness; and (4) counsel requested fifteen additional days to complete the brief.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by APRIL 1, 2013 . Because the brief is already three months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Jeff Buchwald removed as appellant’s att orney and order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.We DIRECT t he Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission to the Honorable Susan Hawk, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
In the MATTER OF: T.E., K.E., Jr.

No. COA16-981

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CEO OF PERIODIC REPORT**     The undersigned, Kevin R. Callahan, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Affirmative InsuranceHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of his knowledge, that:(1) the Interim Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.     Dated: May 10, 2006      /s/ Kevin R. Callahan Kevin R. Callahan    Interim Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
(108 So. 478)

No. 26290.

#### SLADOVICH et al. v. EUREKA HOMESTEAD SOCIETY.

(March 29, 1926.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Judgment <&wkey;407(4) — Petition to annul judgment held to state no cause of action, where every issue tendered by petition was presented by plaintiff’s appeal from such judgment.

Exception of no cause of action *held*properly sustained in suit to annul judgment, .where every issue tendered by plaintiff’s petition was presented by their appeal from judgment which they sought to annul.

2. Judgment &wkey;>407(4) — Party cannot sue to annul judgment rendered against him for a cause for which it may be annulled on appeal which he has taken.

Party against whom a judgment has been rendered cannot sue to annul judgment for a cause for which it may be annulled on an appeal which he has taken.

*271Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Wm. H. Byrnes, Jr., Judge.

Action by George Sladovieh, Sr. and Jr., against tho Eureka Homestead Society. Erom judgment of dismissal, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

George Sladovieh, Sr., of New Orleans, for appellants.

McOloskey & Benedict, of New Orleans, for appellee.

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is a suit to annul the judgment that was rendered against the present plaintiffs as defendants in the suit of the Eureka Homestead Society v. George Sladovich, Sr. and Jr. (No. 25914) 108 So. 477,1 decided to-day. This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the action of nullity on an exception of no cause of action, because the complaints made by the plaintiffs here were being brought up by their appeal from the judgment which they were suing to annul.

[1,2] The exception of no cause of action was properly sustained. Every issue tendered- by the plaintiffs’ petition in this suit was presented by their appeal from the judgment which they are now suing to annul, and was disposed of by our decree affirming the judgment. The appeal from that judgment was taken and perfected by the filing of an appeal bond before this suit to annul the judgment was filed. A party against whom a judgment has been rendered cannot sue to annul the judgment for a cause for which it may be annulled on an appeal which he has taken. Gilmore v. Gilmore, 9 La. Ann. 204; Taliaferro v. Steele, 14 La. Ann. 656; Blanck v. Speckman, 23 La. Ann. 146; Esterbrook v. Gauche, 27 La. Ann. 36; Payne & Joubert v. Schaeffer-Gaiennie Co., 44 So. 134, 119 La. 382.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

 Ante, p. 265.
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Lee CLYBURN

No. COA17-258

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 3, 2017

NO ERROR.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 30 November 2005         

amending Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat, milk and fish sectors in Poland

(notified under document number C(2005) 4595)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/854/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (1), and in particular Annex XII, Chapter 6, Section B, Subsection I(1), paragraph (e) thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The establishments listed in the Annex to this Decision are deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33.

(2)OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 53; corrected version in OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 39.

(3)OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 56; corrected version in OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 31.

(4)OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 73; corrected version in OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 44.

(5)OJ L 86, 5.4.2005, p. 13.

(6)OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 96.

----

ANNEX

List of establishments to be deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession

MEAT ESTABLISHMENTS

Initial list

Supplementary list

POULTRY MEAT

Initial list

Supplementary list

MILK SECTOR

Initial list

Supplementary list

FISH SECTOR

Initial list

Supplementary list

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 1 to the Treasury Department Circular 570; 2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005, at 70 FR 38502.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Buckeye Union Insurance Company has redomesticated from the State of Ohio to the State of Illinois effective January 1, 2005. The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 70 FR 38510, July 1, 2005.

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2005 revision, on page 38510 to reflect this change.

                    The Circular may be reviewed and downloaded through the Internet                     *(http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570/​index.html)*                     or through our computerized public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6887. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 769-004-05219-0.                

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: September 9, 2005.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 05-18969 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      J.
      Stewart Asbury III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal
      quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc.


Date:
                      October 23, 2007
                  
                  /s/
                      J. Stewart Asbury IIIJ.
                            Stewart Asbury III
                          Chief
                            Executive Officer and
                            President





I,
      Clayton Woodrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal
      quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc.


Date:
                    October 23,
                    2007
                  
                  /s/
                      Clayton WoodrumClayton
                              Woodrum
                            Chief
                              Financial
                              Officer
In the MATTER OF: A.U.

No. COA16-1284

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 18, 2017

AFFIRMED.
Arkeem Hakim JORDAN v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 68P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Arkeem Hakim Jordan, for Jordan, Arkeem Hakim.

*298***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of March 2017 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 2nd of March 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Durham County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of March 2017 by Petitioner to Proceed as a Man Without Proper Funds:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2009 – Ristic and Others v Commission**

**(Case T-238/07)**

Animal health – Protective measures – Decision 2007/362/EC – Action for annulment – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Principle of proportionality – Principle of protection of legitimate expectations – Duty of care – Right to property and right to carry on economic activity

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 37-39)*

2.                     *Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure
of the Court of First Instance, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 51-52)*

3.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 55-56)*

4.                     *Agriculture – Approximation of laws on animal health – Control measures to be implemented in relation to certain substances
and their residues in live animals and their products – Directive 96/23 (Council Directive 96/23; Commission Decision 2007/362)
(see paras 58-60, 66-68, 74, 76-82)*

5.                     *Agriculture – Approximation of laws on animal health – Control measures to be implemented in relation to certain substances
and their residues in live animals and their products – Directive 96/23 (Council Directive 96/23; Commission Decision 2007/362)
(see paras 85-91)*

6.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 92-93)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | First, application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/362/EC of 16 May 2007 amending Decision 2004/432/EC on the approval of residue monitoring plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Council Directive 96/23/EC (OJ 2007 L 138, p. 18), and, second, application for damages. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Operative part |

The Court:

1.         Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the application for annulment;

2.         Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.         Orders Ristic AG, Piratic Meeresfrüchte Import GmbH, Prime Catch Seafood GmbH and Rainbow Export Processing, SA to pay the
costs, including those of the interlocutory proceedings.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest DRAYTON, Jr.

No. 207P08-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Mr. Ernest Drayton, Jr., for Drayton, Ernest, Jr.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of July 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, New Hanover County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P.(the “Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick D. BOGER

No. 158P06-14

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mr. Derrick D. Boger, for Boger, Derrick D.

Ms. Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Ms. Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd of July 2017 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cabarrus County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of July 2017 by Defendant for Civil Tort Claim:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-74976, 333-51625, 333-86509, 333-50214 and 333-33192) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-83064, 333-03889, 333-28151, 333-58907, 333-61738, 333-78523 and 333-48220) pertaining to Targeted Genetics Corporation’s1992 Restated Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors, 1999 Stock Option Plan and Genovo Roll-over Stock Option Plan, of our report dated February 24, 2003, except for the third paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date isMarch 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Targeted Genetics Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

March 26, 2003
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120692),2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150737),3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-94782),4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-22211),5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-43267),6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39282) ,7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65592),8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125571) of Liberty Property Trust and
Liberty Property Limited Partnership, and9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-156460),10)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-148614),11)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-14139),12)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141314) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,13)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32244) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,14)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-53297),15)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63115),16)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37218),17)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45032),18)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62504) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,19)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62506) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan,20)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63494),21)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63978),22)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-91702),23)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107482),24)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-108040),25)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-114609),26)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-118994),27)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130948),28)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-125572),29)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-122365), and30)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118995) pertaining to the Liberty Property
Trust Amended and Restated Share Incentive Plan, and in the related Prospectuses
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Stern, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|March 31, 2009 |  | /S/ DANNY STERN
Danny SternChief Executive Officer
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---