alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3901 

To prohibit contributions by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the Housing 

Trust Fund and the Capital Market Fund while such enterprises are 

in conservatorship or receivership, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. ROYCE (for himself, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. GARRETT, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. ROSS, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. PITTENGER, 

Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. DUFFY, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. MULVANEY, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. HURT, and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit contributions by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 

to the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Market 

Fund while such enterprises are in conservatorship or 

receivership, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Back the Tax5 payers Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3901 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO HOUSING 

2 TRUST FUND AND CAPITAL MAGNET FUND 

3 WHILE ENTERPRISES ARE IN CONSERVATOR4 SHIP OR RECEIVERSHIP. 

5 Notwithstanding section 1337 of the Federal Hous6 ing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 

7 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4567) or any other provision of law, dur8 ing the term of any conservatorship or receivership of the 

9 Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal 

10 Home Loan Mortgage Corporation pursuant to section 

11 1367 of such Act (12 U.S.C. 4617), such enterprise shall 

12 not make any contribution or transfer to, or allocate or 

13 set aside any amounts for, the Housing Trust Fund estab14 lished under section 1338 of such Act (12 U.S.C. 4568) 

15 or the Capital Magnet Fund established under section 

16 1339 of such Act (12 U.S.C. 4569). 

17 SEC. 3. USE OF ENTERPRISE REPAYMENTS TO REDUCE 

18 BUDGET DEFICIT. 

19 During the term of any conservatorship or receiver20 ship of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the 

21 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation pursuant to 

22 section 1367 of such Act (12 U.S.C. 4617), any amounts 

23 paid or repaid to the Secretary of the Treasury by the 

24 Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal 

25 Home Loan Mortgage Corporation in any form, including 

26 any dividends paid pursuant to the Amended and Restated 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3901 IH

1 Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements, dated Sep2 tember 26, 2008, amended May 6, 2009, further amended 

3 December 24, 2009, and further amended August 17, 

4 2012, between the United States Department of the 

5 Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association, 

6 and between such Department and the Federal Home 

7 Loan Mortgage Corporation shall be covered into the Gen8 eral Fund of the Treasury and shall be used only for re9 ducing the budget deficit of the Federal Government. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of December, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
Relator addressed and mailed his petition to the Travis County District Clerk, who 1

forwarded the petition to this Court. Trial courts have limited mandamus authority over public

officials, see Sheppard v. Thomas, 101 S.W.3d 577, 580 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003,

pet. denied), but “[o]nly the supreme court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus . . . against

any of the officers of the executive departments of the government of this state to order or compel

the performance of a judicial, ministerial, or discretionary act or duty that . . . the officer or officers

are authorized to perform.” Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.002(c) (West 2004). 

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00571-CV

In re Benny Wayne Stewart

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Benny Wayne Stewart has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking that

we compel Nathaniel Quarterman, the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, and Rissie Owens, the Chair of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, to comply with

certain statutes governing disciplinary procedures against inmates of TDCJ. See Tex. R. App. 1

P. 52.8. We lack the authority to issue a writ against respondents in this case. See Tex. Gov’t Code

Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (courts of appeals have general mandamus authority over trial court

judges and may issue writs to non-judge respondents only to protect jurisdiction). We therefore deny

the petition for writ of mandamus.
2

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: September 26, 2008
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

June 7, 2024 SC-2024-0281 Ex parte C.G. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: C.G. v. Marion County Department of Human Resources) (Marion Juvenile Court: JU-21-206.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0401). CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on June 7, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Wise, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
**EXHIBIT 21.0**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Parent

 

TF Financial Corporation

 
| **Subsidiaries**                        | ** ** | **Percentage  Owned** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** | ** **     |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------|
|                                    |       |                  |       |                                    |           |
| Third Federal Bank (a)                  |       | 100                   | %          |                                    | United  States |   |
|                                    |       |                  |       |                                    |           |   |
| TF Investments Corporation (a)          |       | 100                   | %          |                                    | Delaware       |   |
|                                    |       |                  |       |                                    |           |   |
| Teragon Financial Corporation (a)(b)    |       | 100                   | %          |                                    | Pennsylvania   |   |
|                                    |       |                  |       |                                    |           |   |
| Penns Trail Development Corporation (a) |       | 100                   | %          |                                    | Delaware       |   |
|                                    |       |                  |       |                                    |           |   |
| Third Delaware Corporation (a) (b) |       | 100                   | %          |                                    | Delaware       |   |

 

----

(a)                                  Theoperations of this subsidiary are included in the consolidated financialstatements contained in the 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders incorporatedherein by reference.

 

(b)                                 ThirdDelaware Corporation and Teragon Financial Corporation are wholly-ownedsubsidiaries of Third Federal Bank.

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our reports dated November 11, 1998, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of ABR Information Services, 
Inc. that are included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 
1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in 
the Registration Statements of ABR Information Services, Inc. on Form S-3 (File 
No. 333-2706, effective March 21, 1996), Form S-8 (File No. 33-86520, as
amended, effective December 3, 1996) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-17195, effective
December 3, 1996).

                                          GRANT THORNTON LLP

Tampa, Florida
November 11, 1998
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tora Technologies Inc. (“Tora”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ralph Biggar,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of Tora and a member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Tora.




*/s/
      Ralph Biggar*


Ralph
      Biggar


Chief
      Executive Officer






May
      10,
      2006









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tora Technologies Inc. (“Tora”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ralph Biggar, Chief
      Financial Officer of Tora and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Tora.






*/s/
      Ralph Biggar*


Ralph
      Biggar


Chief
      Financial Officer






May
      10,
      2006
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134845 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

BRENDA L. MOSBY, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 134845 

 COA: 276313 
 WCAC: 05-000324 

HART & COOLEY MANUFACTURING, INC., 

and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE 

OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that portion of the decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) mailed January 24, 2007, which 

determined that the plaintiff has established a compensable disability within the meaning 

of Sington v Chrysler Corp, 467 Mich 144 (2002), and we REMAND this case to the 

WCAC for reconsideration in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008). The 

WCAC may remand this case to the Board of Magistrates for the taking of additional 

proofs and for further findings upon the request of a party. In all other respects, leave to 

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.

 WEAVER, J. (dissenting). 

I dissent from the order remanding this case to the Workers’ Compensation 

Appellate Commission for reconsideration in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 

266 (2008). 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

Because I dissented from the majority opinion in Stokes, I would grant leave to 

appeal in this case to consider whether the Stokes majority reached the correct decision in 

Stokes.

 KELLY, J., joins the statement of WEAVER, J. 

0930 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 3, 2008 

Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136335 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136335 

 COA: 279394 

Ottawa CC: 02-026472-FC 

JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
# Official Journal C 91A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.091.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 91A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 539 April 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.091.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 91A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 539 April 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 091A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General (grade AD 15) of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Brussels (Article 29(2) of European Communities Staff Regulations read with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council) — COM/2010/10255 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 091A/01

Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General (grade AD 15) of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Brussels (Article 29(2) of European Communities Staff Regulations read with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council) — COM/2010/10255

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 20 - 00330 - CV LAKESHIA WELLS , A

PPELLANT V. THE BARATANG IRREVOCABLE LIVING TRUST , APPELLEE

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Bell County, Texas Trial Court No . 90 , 834 , Honorable Jeanne Parker , Presiding



### April 9 , 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ. Appellant, LaKeshia Wells , appeals from the trial court ’s F inal J udgment . 1 Wells ’ s brief was originally due March 8, 2021, but was not filed . By letter of March 15, 2021 , we notified Wells that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution , without

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this C ourt by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 2013).2

further notice, if a brief was not received by March 25 . To date, Wells has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this C ourt. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              71,286
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2,928
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         75,117
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             263,425
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               265,189
<LOANS>                                            261,516
<ALLOWANCE>                                          2,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     625,338
<DEPOSITS>                                         443,584
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 10,682
<LONG-TERM>                                         98,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               529
<OTHER-SE>                                          72,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     625,338
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     18,294
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   13,779
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1,126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    33,199
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  13,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18,235
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               14,964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          382
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     276
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     10,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,173
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           6,173
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.24
<LOANS-NON>                                              0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1,311
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     1,983
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           42
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    2,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 2,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              2,016



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 16





                   [Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co. Letterhead]




February 10, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

RE:      Western Ohio Financial Corporation
         file number 0-24120


To whom it may concern:

We have read the statements of Western Ohio Financial Corporation contained in
form 8-K dated January 29, 1998, a copy of which is attached, and agree with
such statements.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.

CLARK, SCHAEFER, HACKETT & CO.

Enclosure
STATE of North Carolina v. Antwone D. ARCHIE

No. 205P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mr. Antwone Dennard Archie, for Archie, Antwone Dennard.

Mr. Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st of June 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2017 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Hudson, J., recused
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136778 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136778 

 COA: 276687 

Wayne CC: 06-011269-01

JOHN JEROME MURRIEL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00006

- CV

Rosa Mendez v. Javier Salinas and Antara Trucking, L.L.C.

On a ppeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 5062

- 14

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opi nion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 14 , 2018