alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132921 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JEFFREY M. RUPERSBURG, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 132921 

COA: 262470 

ETKIN SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION Oakland CC: 2000-023553-NO 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a A.J. ETKIN

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and BAKER 

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION and L.W. 

CONNELLY & SON, INC.,

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2009 – France v Commission**

**(Case T-432/07)**

EAGGF – Guarantee Section – Expenditure excluded from Community financing – Fruit and vegetables – Conditions for recognition of producers’ organisations

1.                     *Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Fruit and vegetables – Producers’ organisations – EAGGF financing – Recognition
of those organisations by the national authorities – Conditions (Council Regulations Nos 1035/72 and 2200/96, Art. 11(1)(b)
and (2)(d)) (see paras 35-37)*

2.                     *Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Fruit and vegetables – Producers’ organisations – EAGGF financing – Recognition
of those organisations by the national authorities – Conditions (Council Regulation No 2200/96, Art. 11(1)(c)) (see paras
54-56)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/647/EC of 3 October 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2007 L 261, p. 28), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the French Republic for producers’ organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
# C_2008209EN.01006603.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/66

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2008 — UPS Europe and UPS Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-100/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 209/118)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the fifth chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ray Lee ROSS

No. 39P12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Andrew Cochran, Attorney at Law, for Ross, Ray Lee.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of February 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Beasley, J. recused
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 17 April 2008 – Nordmilch v OHIM (Vitality)**

**(Case T-294/06)**

Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark Vitality – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 28-30)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 August 2006 (Case R 746/2004-4) concerning the registration of the word sign Vitality as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Nordmilch eG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Verbal mark Vitality for goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 32, 33 and 43 – Application No 2835684 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Application for registration partially dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Nordmilch eG to pay the costs. |
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

PSS World Medical, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement File Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043, 333-64185, 33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754, 333-30427, 333-50526, 333-58272, 333-104262 and 333-138173 on Form S8 of PSS World Medical, Inc. of our report dated
May 23, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PSS World Medical, Inc. as of March 28, 2008 and March 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the threeyear period ended March 28, 2008, and the related financial statement Schedule II  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
March 28, 2008, which reports appear in the March 28, 2008 annual report on Form 10K of PSS World Medical, Inc.

Our report dated
May 23, 2008 refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, effective April 1, 2006 and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective March 31, 2007.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ KPMG                    
|                            
|May 23, 2008                
|Jacksonville, Florida       
|Certified Public Accountants
Matthew NEREIM, Plaintiff, v. Ryan CUMMINS; City Chevrolet Automotive Company; Hendrick Luxury Collision Center, LLC; and National General Insurance Company; and each of them, Defendants.

No. COA15-1253.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------

                         [Letterhead of Moore & Hansen]

                                  LAW OFFICES
                                 MOORE & HANSEN
                             PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
                              3000 NORWEST CENTER
                            90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET
                         MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA  55402


          We hereby consent to the reference made to our firm, Moore & Hansen,
under the captions "Patents and Proprietary Rights" and "Dependence on Patents
and Proprietary Technology" in Part I and Exhibit 99.1, respectively, of the
Annual Report of Integ Incorporated filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 1997.


Dated:  March 19, 1998

                            MOORE & HANSEN

                            /s/   Malcolm L. Moore

                            Malcolm L. Moore
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3976 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3976

 To provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran 
      with a service-connected disability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2014

Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Horsford, 
 Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Honda, Mr. Langevin, Mrs. Noem, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
Benishek, Ms. Chu, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Walz, Mr. Johnson 
    of Georgia, Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. 
  Garamendi, Mr. Takano, and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in 
     addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran 
      with a service-connected disability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wounded Veterans Recreation Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL PASSES FOR DISABLED VETERANS.

    Section 805(b)(2) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(16 U.S.C. 6804(b)(2)) is amended as follows:
            (1) By inserting ``and for the lifetime of the passholder'' 
        after ``without charge''.
            (2) By striking ``charge, to'' and inserting ``charge, to 
        the following:''.
            (3) By striking ``any United States'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Any United States''.
            (4) By inserting after ``residency.'' the following:
                    ``(B) Any veteran with a service-connected 
                disability, as defined in section 101 of title 38, 
                United States Code.''.
            (5) By striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Arel Communications and Software Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philippe Szwarc, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of

2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/S/ PHILIPPE SZWARC
|-------------------
|Philippe Szwarc    

Chief Executive Officer

June 28, 2005







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2612

ANTHONY J. RANKINE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN RANKINE; CEANET INCORPORATED; CEANET

PARTY LIMITED; COLIN V. RUSSELL; STOREY

BLACKWOOD ACCOUNTANTS; JOHN DEAKER; JOHN

CAMPBELL; DAVID HEWITT; GERALD TEO; J. HAYES,

Mrs.; M. GARNETT, Mrs.; D. BARTON; J. HILL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-96-61-5-V)

Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony J. Rankine, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornelius Landreth,

Hugh Davis North, III, HARRISON, NORTH, COOKE & LANDRETH, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony J. Rankine appeals the district court’s order dismissing, following remand, his civil action on forum non conveniens

grounds. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Rankine v.

Rankine, No. CA-96-61-5-V (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. Appellant’s petition for

sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 56611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 61

RIN 1076-AE44


Preparation of Rolls of Indians

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document reopens the comment period for the proposed rule 
published on May 19, 2005, which opened the enrollment applications 
process for the Western Shoshone Identifiable Group of Indians.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 28, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the number 1076-AE44, 
by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Daisy West, Office of Tribal Services, Bureau of 
Indian Affairs, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 320-SIB, 
Washington, DC 20240.
    <bullet> Hand delivery: Office of Tribal Services, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 320-SIB, Washington, DC 
20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daisy West, Office of Tribal Services, 
Bureau of Indian Affairs, (202) 513-7641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 19, 2005, the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs published a proposed rule to amend its regulations governing 
the compilation of rolls of Indians in order to open the enrollment 
applications process for the Western Shoshone Identifiable Group of 
Indians (70 FR 28859). Last year we made a commitment to hold meetings 
with the Shoshone people to discuss the proposed rule. We were unable, 
however, to schedule the meetings in Elko and Reno, Nevada until August 
20 and 27, 2005. We must therefore extend the comment period beyond the 
original deadline of July 18, 2005.

    Dated: September 16, 2005.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05-19322 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137249 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices In re LAURENCE GEE ROBBINS, JR.

and BRAIN JAMAL ROBBINS, Minors.
 

_________________________________________/ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 137249 

 COA: 284790 
 Wayne Circuit Family

DEONNA I. SANDERS, Division: 04-437255-NA 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

LAURENCE ROBBINS, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we VACATE the May 1 and August 13, 2008 orders of the Court of 

Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reinstatement of the 

respondent-mother’s claim of appeal. The record does not demonstrate that the family 

court substantially complied with the court rules governing termination of the 

respondent-mother’s parental rights and notice of appellate rights. 

d1008 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 15, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATION**I, Brent K. Whittington, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WindstreamCorporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Windstream Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007        /s/ Brent K. Whittington   Brent K. Whittington   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1945

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Brian Southern, * Western District of Missouri.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: September 17, 2008

Filed: September 23, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In 2004, Brian Southern was sentenced to 30 months in prison and 2 years of

supervised release upon his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm.

After he began his supervised release he violated his release conditions, and the

district court1

 revoked supervised release and sentenced him to serve 12 months and

1 day in prison, plus 1 additional year of supervised release. While Southern was

serving his second term of supervised release, he violated a special condition requiring

him to participate satisfactorily in the pre-release component of a community
-2-

corrections center program. The district court again revoked supervised release, this

time sentencing him to serve 11 months in prison with no further supervised release.

Southern appeals, arguing that the court abused its discretion in sentencing him. 

We conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United

States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review).

The court sentenced Southern within the advisory range under Chapter 7 of the

Guidelines, after listening to the arguments of counsel and allocution by Southern,

engaging in a discussion with Southern about his repeated supervision failures, and

expressly considering relevant matters under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (permitting

revocation of supervised release and re-imprisonment after considering specified

factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)); United States v. Franklin, 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th

Cir. 2005) (all that is required is evidence that court considered relevant matters, not

that court made specific findings on each § 3553(a) factor). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures

for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

_________________________________
**Exhibit 32.0**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of TF FinancialCorporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, we, Kent C. Lufkin, President and Chief Executive Officer, andDennis R. Stewart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ‘1350, asadopted pursuant to ‘906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ KENT  C. LUFKIN                   |                                                 | /s/ DENNIS R.  STEWART |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Kent C. Lufkin                        | Dennis R. Stewart                                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 28, 2007                   | March 28, 2007                                  |

 

39

----