alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40382

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR D MANRIQUE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-759-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Hector D. Manrique has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Manrique has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
# C_2008064EN.01001102.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 January 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France)) — Paul Chevassus-Marche v Groupe Danone, Société Kro beer brands SA (BKSA), Société Evian eaux minérales d'Evian SA (SAEME)

(Case C-19/07) (1)

1

(Approximation of laws - Directive 86/653/EEC - Self-employed commercial agents - Right of an agent entrusted with a specific geographical area to a commission - Transactions concluded without any action on the part of the principal)

(2008/C 64/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paul Chevassus-Marche

Applicant:

Defendants: Groupe Danone, Société Kro beer brands SA (BKSA), Société Evian eaux minérales d'Evian SA (SAEME)

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents (OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17) — Termination of the agency contract — Commission owed to a commercial agent entrusted with a specific geographical area or group of persons — Whether there is a right to that commission in the absence of any control, direct or indirect, by the principal over transactions between a third party and a customer belonging to the geographical area entrusted to the agent

Operative part of the judgment

The first indent of Article 7(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents must be interpreted as meaning that a commercial agent entrusted with a specific geographical area does not have the right to a commission for transactions concluded by customers belonging to that area without any action, direct or indirect, on the part of the principal.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-1326V 

Filed: May 1, 2017 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

MAY RUBY JOHNSON, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury 

 * Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Claudia Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On October 12, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

October 29, 2015, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On April 28, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 

at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

a SIRVA, and that it was caused in fact by the flu vaccine she received on October 29, 

2015. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has met the statutory 

requirements for entitlement to compensation. Id.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
# C_2009019EN.01002802.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 26 November 2008 — OHIM v López Teruel

(Case T-284/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Admissibility - Invalidity - Application for an Invalidity Committee to be convened - Circumscribed powers of the Appointing Authority)

(2009/C 19/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and E. Maurage, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Adelaida López Teruel (Guadalajara, Spain) (represented by: initially L. Levi and C. Ronzi, then L. Levi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 22 May 2007 in Case F-97/06 López Teruel v OHIM, not yet published in the ECR, asking for that judgment to be set aside.

López Teruel

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(C)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: October 20-21, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Chernak, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Institute of Nursing 
Research, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 712, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 
20817; (301) 402-6959, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16757e736478777d56787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea89828f98848b81aa848382c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 21, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-19380 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 12, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 12, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0490. THOMAS C. LESTER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

02CR0048
SED Holdings, LLC v. 3 Star Properties, LLC, et al.

211PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 2, 2017

*373R. Hayes Hofler, III, Attorney at Law, Durham, Keith B. Nichols, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For 3 Star Properties, LLC, et al.

Douglas W. Hanna, Attorney at Law, Mark R. Sigmon, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For SED Holdings, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of January 2017 by Defendant to Allow Time to Respond to Motion of Plaintiff to Dissolve the PDR Allowed by this Court:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of February 2017."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0029 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSE LUIS PERALTA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 27 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 16 2021

11/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0029
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0172

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ISAIAH JAMES PEHRINGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 25 2024

07/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0172
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WINSTON HOTELS, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,355
<PP&E>                                         196,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,689
<BONDS>                                         32,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Clarence Joseph TRENT

272P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 11, 2017

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Trent, Clarence Joseph.

Carole Biggers, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of August 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of August 2017."

Morgan, J. recused
February 20, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FRANKIE RAYSHAWN HILL-TURNER, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00971-CR

NO. 14-12-01011-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.71
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 December 31, 2007  (Date)
 La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company Maker General
Electric Capital Corporation Payee 83 Wooster Heights Road, Danbury, CT Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Four Hundred Fifty One
and 29/00 Dollars ($236,451.29)
 PeriodicInstallment
    
    AmountThirty-Six (36)
    
    $
    6,119.60Eleven (11)
    
    $
    5,586.12
    Security
Agreement




---



##### 



Obligor
 THE MAKER HEREBY UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ITS RIGHTS TO A JURY TRIAL OF ANY CLAIM OR CAUSE OF
ACTION BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THIS NOTE, ANY OF THE RELATED
DOCUMENTS, ANY DEALINGS BETWEEN MAKER AND PAYEE RELATING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS
TRANSACTION OR ANY RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND/OR THE RELATIONSHIP THAT IS BEING ESTABLISHED
BETWEEN MAKER AND PAYEE. THE SCOPE OF THIS WAIVER IS INTENDED TO BE ALL ENCOMPASSING OF ANY AND
ALL DISPUTES THAT MAY BE FILED IN ANY COURT (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CONTRACT CLAIMS, TORT
CLAIMS, BREACH OF DUTY CLAIMS, AND ALL OTHER COMMON LAW AND STATUTORY CLAIMS.) THIS WAIVER IS
IRREVOCABLE MEANING THAT IT MAY NOT BE MODIFIED EITHER ORALLY OR IN WRITING, AND THE WAIVER SHALL
APPLY TO ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, RENEWALS, SUPPLEMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS NOTE, ANY
RELATED DOCUMENTS, OR TO ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS OR AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THIS TRANSACTION OR ANY
RELATED TRANSACTION. IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, THIS NOTE MAY BE FILED AS A WRITTEN CONSENT TO
A TRIAL BY THE COURT.




---



##### 



La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company/s/ Lisa Peraza
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Deirdre Gillespie(Witness)Lisa Peraza
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Deirdre Gillespie(Print name)6455 Nancy Ridge Drive
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President & CEOSan Diego, CA 92121(Address)
 Federal Tax ID #: 330361285Address: 6455 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, San Diego County, CA 92121By:
    
    /s/ Gail A. SloanName:
    
    Gail A. SloanTitle:
    
    VP Finance
STATE v. Gyrell Shavonta LEE

335PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 23, 2017

Paul M. Green, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Lee, Gyrell Shavonta.

*302Kimberly D. Potter, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of March 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of March 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 16th day of May 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
TeleBanc Financial Corporation:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference  in the  registration  statement  No.
F33-91786  on Form S-1 and on Form S-3 of  TeleBanc  Financial  Corporation  and
subsidiary of our report dated February 24, 1995,  relating to the  consolidated
statement of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 1994,  which report is  incorporated by reference in the
December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of TeleBanc Financial Corporation.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick


Washington, D.C.
March 26, 1997
<PAGE>


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  in this Form 10-K of our report dated  February 14, 1997  included in
TeleBanc Financial  Corporation's  Annual Report for the year ended December 31,
1996.  It should be noted that we have not audited any  financial  statements of
the company  subsequent to December 31, 1996 or performed any audit  procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,435,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  396,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    665,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,253,000
<PP&E>                                      68,588,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,266,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,009,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       89,760,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (29,263,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,009,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,525,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,621,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,148,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,166,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,166,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,166,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)
        


</TABLE>
Randall COLE v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

No. 182P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Ms. Tamika L. Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department Of Public Safety.

Mr. John C. Hunter, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Randall Cole.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of June 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
ELI GLOBAL, LLC and Greg Lindberg v. James A. HEAVNER

No. 12PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Kendal B. Reed, Attorney at Law, for Eli Global, LLC, et al.

James H. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Richard M. Hutson, II, Attorney at Law, Durham, Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney at Law, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for Heavner, James A.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th of January 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiffs, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of January 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15 (g)(2).