United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

R.B., Appellant 

and 

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Ithaca, NY, Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 15-0192 

Issued: August 6, 2015 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se 

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

DECISION AND ORDER 

Before: 

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge 

JURISDICTION 

On November 4, 2014 appellant filed a timely appeal of a July 7, 2014 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ 

Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over 

the merits of this case.2

ISSUES 

The issues are: (1) whether appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $12,088.11 for the period November 1, 2009 through May 31, 2014 because he 

received full FECA compensation benefits concurrently with Social Security Administration 

(SSA) retirement benefits; (2) whether he was at fault in creating the overpayment, thereby 

 1

 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. 

2

 The Board notes that, following the July 7, 2014 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board may only review evidence that was in the record at the time OWCP issued its final decision. See 20 C.F.R. 

§ 501.2(c)(1); M.B., Docket No. 09-176 (issued September 23, 2009); J.T., 59 ECAB 293 (2008); G.G., 58 ECAB 

389 (2007); Donald R. Gervasi, 57 ECAB 281 (2005); Rosemary A. Kayes, 54 ECAB 373 (2003). 
2

precluding waiver of recovery; (3) whether OWCP properly required repayment of the 

overpayment by deducting $450.00 every 28 days from appellant’s continuing compensation. 

On appeal, appellant argues that he was unaware that he was receiving dual benefits as he 

did not realize that his Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) benefits were considered 

to be SSA benefits. 

FACTUAL HISTORY 

On September 3, 1994 appellant, then a 50-year-old letter carrier, filed a traumatic injury 

claim alleging that on that day he had lower right side and upper muscle pain due to pulling a 

heavy box to the door and handing it to the customer. OWCP accepted the claim for lumbosacral 

joint strain, lumbar strain, sacroiliac ligament strain, lumbago, and backache. By letter dated 

August 6, 1996, it placed appellant on the periodic rolls for temporary total disability. 

In a letter dated December 16, 2009, OWCP informed appellant that it needed to 

determine if he was in receipt of SSA benefits going back to when he turned 65. It informed him 

that compensation benefits under FECA must be adjusted for any FERS benefits paid by SSA 

(the portion of SSA benefits attributable to federal service of the employee) pursuant to section 

8116(d) of FECA. OWCP informed appellant that “[a]ll SSA retirees age 65 or older, who are 

covered by FERS, are subject to the FERS offset. It stated that he must submit either a written 

statement or documentation indicating which retirement system he was under. 

In response to OWCP’s request, appellant submitted a letter from SSA informing him 

that he was no longer entitled to receive SSA disability benefits beginning November 1, 2009 as 

he had reached the full retirement age. He also informed OWCP that he reached the retirement 

age of 65 on November 15, 2008 and that he was covered under the retirement system of FERS. 

Appellant completed and signed EN1032 forms on November 12, 2010, November 17, 

2011, November 26, 2012,3 and November 14, 2013 indicating that he had not worked for the 

previous 15 months, was not self-employed and had not received either retirement benefits or 

SSA benefits as part of an annuity under FERS. He responded “No” to the question of whether 

he received benefits from SSA as part of an annuity for federal service. This form stated, “I 

understand that I must immediately report to OWCP any improvement or employment activity, 

any change in the status of claimed dependents, any third-party settlement, and any monies or 

income or change in monies or income from federally-assisted disability or benefit programs.” 

In a facsimile (fax) transmittal dated May 16, 2014, OWCP requested that SSA provide 

information regarding the dual benefits appellant received. It forwarded a form entitled “FERS 

SSA DUAL BENEFITS CALCULATIONS FAX TRANSMITTAL.” Appellant’s name, date of 

birth, and social security number were noted on the form. OWCP also provided information 

regarding the date he was first eligible to receive benefits under FECA. The form requested SSA 

to provide separate benefit calculations of SSA with FERS, and SSA without FERS. 

 3

 An undated, but signed EN1032 form was received on November 30, 2012. 
3

An SSA representative responded on May 20, 2014.4 

On June 3, 2014 OWCP issued a preliminary overpayment determination finding that 

appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $12,088.11 for the period 

November 1, 2009 through May 31, 2014. It explained that part of his SSA retirement benefits 

were subject to offset. For the period November 1 through 30, 2009, the FERS offset (based on 

28 days) was $7.04 a day for 30 days equaling $211.05. For the period December 1, 2009 

through November 30, 2010, the FERS offset (based on 28 days) was $7.04 a day for 365 days 

equaling $2,567.84. For the period December 1, 2010 through November 30, 2011, the FERS 

offset (based on 28 days) was $7.04 a day for 365 days equaling $2,567.84. For the period 

December 1, 2011 through November 30, 2012, the FERS offset (based on 28 days) was $7.29 a 

day for 366 days equaling $2,667.78. For the period December 1, 2012 through November 30, 

2013, the FERS offset (based on 28 days) was $7.41 a day for 365 days equaling $2,705.01. For 

the period December 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014, 2010, the FERS offset (based on 28 days) 

was $7.52 a day for 182 days equaling $1,368.60. This created an overpayment of compensation 

in the amount of $12,088. OWCP noted that appellant’s compensation had not been reduced 

effective November 1, 2009 for the FERS offset and, thus, an overpayment existed. It found that 

he was at fault in the creation of the overpayment because he should have known or reasonably 

been aware that he was not entitled to receive SSA retirement benefits and FECA benefits at the 

same time. OWCP advised appellant of his right to either request a telephone conference, 

request a decision on the written record, or to request a prerecoupment hearing with the Branch 

of Hearings and Review. Appellant was afforded 30 days to respond in writing to the 

preliminary determination but did not respond. 

By decision dated July 7, 2014, OWCP finalized the preliminary overpayment 

determination. It denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment because appellant was at fault in 

the creation of the overpayment. OWCP directed recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$450.00 from his continuing compensation payments every 28 days. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1 

Section 8116(d) of FECA requires that compensation benefits be reduced by the portion 

of SSA benefits based on age or death that are attributable to federal service and that, if an 

employee receives SSA benefits based on federal service, his or her disability compensation 

benefits under FECA shall be reduced by the amount of SSA benefits attributable to his or her 

federal service.5

 4

 Effective November 2009, appellant’s SSA rate with FERS was $1,219.79 a month. Excluding his FERS 

contributions, he would have received only $1,006.30 in SSA benefits each month. Beginning December 2010, the 

amounts increased to $1,263.60 (with FERS) and $1,042.50 (without FERS). In December 2012, the amounts 

increased to $1,285.60 (with FERS) and $1,060.20 (without FERS). Beginning December 2013, the amounts 

increased to $1,304.20 (with FERS) and $1,076.19 (without FERS). Effective June 1, 2014, OWCP reduced 

appellant’s 28-day compensation rate by $210.55 based on the recent information provided by SSA. 

5

 5 U.S.C. § 8116(d). See D.S., Docket No. 12-689 (issued October 10, 2012); G.B., Docket No. 11-1568 (issued 

February 15, 2012); see also Janet K. George (Angelos George), 54 ECAB 201 (2002). 
4

OWCP’s procedures provide that, while SSA benefits are payable concurrently with 

FECA benefits, the following restrictions apply: in disability cases, FECA benefits will be 

reduced by SSA benefits paid on the basis of age and attributable to the employee’s federal 

service.6

 The offset of FECA benefits by SSA benefits attributable to employment under FERS 

is calculated as follows: where a claimant has received SSA benefits, OWCP will obtain 

information from SSA as to the amount of the claimant’s benefits beginning with the date of 

eligibility to FECA benefits. SSA will provide the actual amount of SSA benefits received by 

the claimant/beneficiary. It will also provide a hypothetical SSA benefit computed without the 

FERS covered earnings. OWCP will then deduct the hypothetical benefit from the actual benefit 

to determine the amount of benefits which are attributable to federal service and that amount will 

be deducted from FECA benefits to obtain the amount of compensation payable.7

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1 

Appellant received FECA wage-loss compensation and SSA benefits from November 1, 

2009 to May 31, 2014. The portion of SSA benefits he earned as a federal employee as part of 

his FERS retirement package and the receipt of benefits under FECA and FERS benefits 

concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.8

 OWCP requested and SSA provided information 

regarding appellant’s applicable SSA rates and their effective dates. Based on these rates, it 

determined that the prohibited dual benefits appellant received from November 1, 2009 through 

May 31, 2014 created an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $12,088.11. 

The Board has reviewed OWCP’s calculations of the dual benefits appellant received for 

the period November 1, 2009 through May 31, 2014 and finds that it properly determined that he 

received benefits totaling $12,088.11 for this period, thus creating an overpayment of 

compensation in that amount. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2 

Section 8129(b) of FECA9 provides: “Adjustment or recovery by the United States may 

not be made when incorrect payment has been made to an individual who is without fault and 

when adjustment or recovery would defeat the purpose of FECA of would be against equity and 

good conscience.”10 

 6 See also R.C., Docket No. 09-2131 (issued April 2, 2010); Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, 

Dual Benefits, Chapter 2.1000.4(a) (February 1995); Chapter 2.1000.4(e)(2) (February 1995); Chapter 2.1000.11 

(February 1995). OWCP does not require an election between FECA benefits and SSA benefits except when they 

are attributable to the employee’s federal service. 

7

 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (issued February 3, 1997). Retirement benefits paid by OPM or SSA can be paid 

concurrently with a schedule award without any deduction from FECA benefits. 

8 See P.G., Docket No. 13-589 (issued July 9, 2013); FECA Bulletin No. 97-9 (issued February 3, 1997). 

9

 5 U.S.C. § 8129(d). 

10 J.K., Docket No. 08-1761 (issued January 8, 2009); Joan Ross, 57 ECAB 694 (2006); Desiderio Martinez, 55 

ECAB 245 (2004). 
5

OWCP may consider waiving an overpayment of compensation only if the individual to 

whom it was made was not at fault in accepting or creating the overpayment. Each recipient of 

compensation benefits is responsible for taking all reasonable measures to ensure that payments 

he or she received from OWCP are proper. The recipient must show good faith and exercise a 

high degree of care in reporting events, which may affect entitlement to or the amount of 

benefits. A recipient who has done any of the following will be found to be at fault with respect 

to creating an overpayment: (1) Made an incorrect statement as to a material fact which he or 

she knew or should have known to be incorrect; (2) Failed to provide information which he or 

she knew or should have known to be material; or (3) Accepted a payment which he or she knew 

or should have known to be incorrect (this provision applies only to the overpaid individual).11 

Whether or not OWCP determines that an individual was at fault with respect to the 

creation of an overpayment depends on the circumstances surrounding the overpayment. The 

degree of care expected may vary with the complexity of those circumstances and the 

individual’s capacity to realize that he or she is being overpaid.12

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2 

OWCP found that appellant was at fault in the creation of the overpayment because he 

made an incorrect statement as to a material fact that he knew or should have known to be 

incorrect. In his EN1032 forms completed on November 12, 2010, November 17, 2011, 

November 26, 2012, and November 14, 2013, appellant reported that he had not received 

benefits from SSA as part of an annuity for federal service. This was not an accurate statement 

as he was clearly receiving SSA benefits for his federal employment at these times. In a 

December 16, 2009 letter, OWCP advised appellant that his FECA compensation benefits would 

be offset by any FERS benefits received as part of SSA. On January 11, 2010 it received 

evidence from him indicating that SSA had converted his disability benefits to retirement 

benefits effective November 1, 2009 and that he was covered under the FERS retirement system. 

Appellant had responded “No” to the question regarding SSA benefits on the EN1032 form he 

completed on July 22, 2012. 

The Board finds that appellant was aware that he received SSA and FECA benefits 

simultaneously. Appellant informed OWCP that he was receiving FERS benefits under SSA 

benefits, but inaccurately failed to report that he received SSA benefits on the EN1032 forms he 

completed. Based on the clear language of the forms which appellant knowingly signed, he 

made an incorrect statement as to a material fact. The Board finds that appellant was at fault in 

the creation of the overpayment and is therefore precluded from receiving a waiver.13

On appeal appellant argues that he was unaware that his benefits from SSA were for 

disability and not for his retirement. The evidence of record does not support this contention. 

OWCP informed appellant on December 16, 2009 that compensation benefits under FECA 

 11 20 C.F.R. § 10.433(a). 

12 Id. at § 10.433(b). 

13 See R.L., Docket No. 13-713 (issued August 15, 2013). 
6

compensation benefits must be adjusted for any FERS benefits paid by SSA (the portion of SSA 

benefits attributable to federal service of the employee) pursuant to section 8116(d). On 

January 11, 2010 appellant informed OWCP that he was covered under FERS and submitted a 

letter from SSA informing him that he would no longer be receiving disability benefits from SSA 

and that as of November 1, 2009 he would be receiving retirement benefits. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3 

Section 10.441 of OWCP regulations provide that, when an overpayment has been made 

to an individual who is entitled to further payments, the individual shall refund to OWCP the 

amount of the overpayment as soon as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to 

the same. If no refund is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of compensation, taking 

into account the probable extent of future payments, the rate of compensation, the financial 

circumstances of the individual and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize hardship.14

 

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3 

OWCP determined that $450.00 would be withheld from each of appellant’s continuing 

compensation payments until the overpayment was recovered. In making this determination, it 

noted that he failed to submit supporting financial documentation. Because appellant failed to 

submit the requested financial documentation, OWCP properly determined that withholding 

$450.00 from each of appellant’s continuing compensation benefits was reasonable. The Board 

will affirm OWCP’s decision on rate of recovery. 

CONCLUSION 

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $12,088.11, properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment and acted within its discretion when it required that he repay the overpayment by 

deducting $450.00 from his continuing compensation. 

 14 The Board has jurisdiction to review the issue of recovery of an overpayment in those cases where OWCP 

seeks recovery from continuing compensation benefits. See Desiderio Martinez, supra note 9; see also J.M., Docket 

No. 10-1913 (issued July 11, 2011). 
7

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs dated July 7, 2014 is affirmed. 

Issued: August 6, 2015 

Washington, DC 

 

 Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board