alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Keating, No. 

2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7, 

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133522 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133522 

 COA: 264597 

Oakland CC: 04-199751-FH 

THOMAS WAYNE RUSSELL, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of July 18, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Cannon, (Docket No. 131994). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

June 4, 2008, 481 Mich 152 (2008), the application is again considered and, pursuant to 

MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court 

of Appeals judgment addressing defendant’s argument regarding whether points for 

predatory conduct may be assessed for Offense Variable 10, MCL 777.40(3)(a) 

(exploitation of a vulnerable victim), where the victim is a police decoy, and we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of that issue in light of 

Cannon, supra. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2008 

 Clerk
NO. 12-23-00299-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EMILY REED, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 173RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Emily Reed, filed a motion to withdraw this appeal. The motion is 

electronically signed by Appellant and her counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a); TEX. R. APP. P.

9.1(c). No decision has been delivered in the appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to 

dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered April 17, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 17, 2024

NO. 12-23-00299-CR

EMILY REED,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 173rd District Court

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CR20-0363-173)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
# Official Journal L 49/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 49 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5925 February 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 49

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5925 February 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/257 of 24 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 367/2014 setting the net balance available for EAGF expenditure | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/258 of 24 February 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/259 of 24 February 2016 fixing an acceptance percentage for the issuing of export licences, rejecting export-licence applications and suspending the lodging of export-licence applications for out-of-quota sugar | 7 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/260 of 23 February 2016 amending Decision 2006/80/EC as regards Poland
  (notified under document C(2016) 965) | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/257 of 24 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 367/2014 setting the net balance available for EAGF expenditure

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/258 of 24 February 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/259 of 24 February 2016 fixing an acceptance percentage for the issuing of export licences, rejecting export-licence applications and suspending the lodging of export-licence applications for out-of-quota sugar

7

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/260 of 23 February 2016 amending Decision 2006/80/EC as regards Poland
  (notified under document C(2016) 965)

(notified under document C(2016) 965)

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 10.10


 


TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT


 


This TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT,
by and between Safety Quick Light LLC, a limited liability company organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Florida, having a place of business at 16111 Biscayne Blvd. North Miami
FL 33160 (hereinafter “Assignor”), and SAFETY QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware, having a place of business at 3245 Peachtree Parkway, Suite D310 Suwanee,
GA 30024 (hereinafter “Assignee”).


 


WHEREAS, Assignor
is the owner of the following trademarks (collectively referred to as “the Marks”) together with the goodwill of the
business symbolized by the Marks:





	 	MARK	Registration No.	COUNTRY
	 	 	3,518,197	US
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	SAFETY QUICK LIGHT	858152	WO
	 	SAFETY QUICK LIGHT	858152	EU
	 	SAFETY QUICK LIGHT	1075118	AU
	 	SAFETY QUICK LIGHT	TMA 721,539	CA
	 	SAFETY QUICK LIGHT	3,166,354 (cancelled)	US;







 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to enter into this Assignment for the purpose of transferring all right, title, and interest in and to said Mark, together
with the goodwill of the business symbolized by the Mark;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor does hereby
assign, sell, transfer and set over to Assignee, its successors and assigns, all rights, title, and interest in and to the Marks,
together with the goodwill of the business symbolized by said Marks, in the United States, its territories and possessions,
and all foreign countries throughout the world, as well as all rights of action and recovery for past, present, and future infringements
thereof for the full term and all subsequent terms of the registrations as fully and entirely as the same would have been held
and enjoyed by the Assignor had this Assignment not been made.



    	 



    	 



    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this ASSIGNMENT as of the last date below.


 


ASSIGNOR:


SAFETY QUICK LIGHT LLC


 


By: /s/ Rani Kohen


 


Name: Rani Kohen


 


Title: CEO


 


Date: November 14, 2013


 


ASSIGNEE:


SAFETY QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.


 


By: /s/ Rani Kohen


 


Name:Rani Kohen


 


Title: Chairman


 


Date: November 14, 2013


 


SAFETY QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.


 


By:  /s/ James R. Hills


 


Name:James R. Hills


 


Title: CEO


 


Date: November 14, 2013


 


	Witness:	 	/s/ Angella Larson-Coone	 	Date:	 	November 14, 2013
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness:	 	/s/ Dinah Fuentes	 	Date:	 	November 14, 2013
In the MATTER OF the Imprisonment of: Ryan Lamar PARSONS

No. 320P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 25, 2017

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Ryan Lamar Parsons, for Parsons, Ryan Lamar.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 22nd of September 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of September 2017."
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  State of
                                                  Percentage   Incorporation
                                                      of             or
Parent                    Subsidiary              Ownership     Organization
------                    ----------              ----------  ----------------
<S>                       <C>                     <C>         <C>
Ottawa Financial
 Corporation              AmeriBank               100%        Federal


AmeriBank                 OS Services, Inc.       100%        Michigan


AmeriBank                 Midwest Investment      100%        Michigan
                          Services, Inc.

</TABLE>

     The financial statements of Ottawa Financial Corporation are consolidated
with those of its subsidiaries.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We consent to incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-110307 and 333-141566) and Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-134901, 333-110308,33-96624, 333-48597, 333-52927 and 333-51884) of our report dated March 5, 2008 with respect to thefinancial statements of MakeMusic Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the yearended December 31, 2007./s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
DENY and Opinion Filed June 5, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00377-CV 

IN RE NICHOLAS D. MOSSER, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 471st Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 471-06006-2019 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

In his April 26, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator complains that the 

trial court violated the automatic stay of the bankruptcy code by setting hearings in 

the underlying matter. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to 

demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an 

adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–

36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator 

has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

230377F.P05 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CPI International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, O. JoeCaldarelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ O. Joe Caldarelli   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| O. Joe Caldarelli       |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 13, 2007         |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4179 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish requirements relating 

to marijuana impaired driving, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2014 

Mr. POLIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish requirements relating to marijuana impaired driving, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lucid Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SAFETY INCENTIVES TO PREVENT OPERATION OF 

6 MOTOR VEHICLES BY INTOXICATED PER7 SONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 163 of title 23, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4179 IH

1 ‘‘(g) MARIJUANA IMPAIRED DRIVING.—In addition to 

2 the other requirements of this section, in the case of a 

3 State in which the use of marijuana is legal under the 

4 laws of the State with or without medical justification, the 

5 State shall be eligible for a grant under subsection (b), 

6 and shall be exempt from withholding under subsection 

7 (e), for a fiscal year only if the State— 

8 ‘‘(1) has in effect a law that prohibits an indi9 vidual from driving or being in actual physical con10 trol of a motor vehicle while impaired by marijuana 

11 as determined using measures established by the 

12 State; and 

13 ‘‘(2) enforces that law using training and meth14 ods for determining cognitive or physical marijuana 

15 impairment.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub17 section (a) shall apply to fiscal years beginning after the 

18 date of enactment of this Act. 

19 SEC. 3. MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS 

20 FOR DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR DRIV21 ING UNDER THE INFLUENCE. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(a)(2) of title 23, 

23 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

24 ‘‘(2) DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED; DRIVING

25 UNDER THE INFLUENCE.—The terms ‘driving while 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4179 IH

1 intoxicated’ and ‘driving under the influence’ 

2 mean— 

3 ‘‘(A) driving or being in actual physical 

4 control of a motor vehicle while having an alco5 hol concentration above the permitted limit as 

6 established by each State; and 

7 ‘‘(B) in the case of a State in which the 

8 use of marijuana is legal under the laws of the 

9 State with or without medical justification, driv10 ing or being in actual physical control of a 

11 motor vehicle while impaired by marijuana as 

12 determined using measures established by the 

13 State.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub15 section (a) shall apply to fiscal years beginning after the 

16 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of TeleBanc Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  TeleBanc
Financial  Corporation (a Delaware  Corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December
31,  1996  and  1995  and  the  related   consolidated   statements  of  income,
stockholders' equity  and cash flows for the years then ended.  These  financial
statements   are  the   responsibility   of  the   Company's   management.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects,  the financial position of TeleBanc Financial Corporation
and  Subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1996 and 1995,  and the  results of its
operations  and its cash flows for the years then ended  December  31,  1996 and
1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Washington, DC
February 14, 1997  (except with respect to the matters  discussed in Note 20, as
to which the date is February 28, 1997)
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Wayne SPANN

No. 538P13-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

*42Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Mary March Exum, Attorney at Law, for Spann, Ronald Wayne.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of February 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of February 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Caldwell County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
STATE v. Christina Shea WALTERS

548A00-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2017

Shelagh R. Kenney, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Walters, Christina Shea.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James E. Williams, Jr., Attorney at Law, Carrboro, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Becton, Charles, et al.

Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, for Retired Members of NC Judiciary.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of June 2017 by State of NC for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of June 2017."
# Official Journal L 34/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 666 February 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 34

English edition

Legislation

Volume 666 February 2023

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2023/246 of 30 January 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 as regards the exchange of information maintained in the electronic registers concerning economic operators who move excise goods between Member States for commercial purposes | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2023/246 of 30 January 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 as regards the exchange of information maintained in the electronic registers concerning economic operators who move excise goods between Member States for commercial purposes

1

| | | II   Non-legislative acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/247 of 1 February 2023 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Estepa’ (PDO)) | 4 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/248 of 1 February 2023 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 6 |

II   Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/247 of 1 February 2023 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Estepa’ (PDO))

4

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/248 of 1 February 2023 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.