alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

2010 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

INTRODUCTION

 

WHEREAS, at the April 30, 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting, Winmark Corporation’s shareholders approved an Amendment to the 2010 Stock Option Plan to (i) increase the total number of shares available for options under the plan from 250,000 to 500,000, and (ii) include a per annum limitation on the number of options granted to any one individual.

 

AMENDMENT

 

1.                                      Section 6 of the 2010 Stock Option Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“The Stock to be optioned under this Plan shall consist of authorized but unissued shares of Option Stock.  Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares of Option Stock shall be reserved and available for options under the Plan; provided, however that the total number of shares of Option Stock reserved for options under this Plan shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12 of the Plan.  No Optionee may be granted more than 150,000 shares of Option Stock in the aggregate in any calendar year; provided, however, that this annual limitation shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12 of the Plan.  In the event that any outstanding option under the Plan for any reason expires or is terminated prior to the exercise thereof, the shares of Option Stock allocable to the unexercised portion of such option shall continue to be reserved for options under the Plan and may be optioned hereunder.”
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135977 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 135977 

 COA: 273330 

Charlevoix CC: 05-005010-FH 

KARLA SUE LOCKMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1014
DOROTHY P. LITZENBERG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 01-837-L) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Joel L. McElvain, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; B. John Williams, Jr., INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dorothy P. Litzenberg appeals from the tax court’s orders dismissing her petition based on her failure to appear for the scheduled trial and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Litzenberg’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss on the reasoning of the tax court. See Litzenberg v. Comm’r , No. 01-837-L (U.S.T.C. Sept. 17, Oct. 23, & Oct. 4, 2002). We also deny Litzenberg’s “Motion for Special Judicial Appointment, Hearing, Counsel, and Related Relief.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Opinion issued March 15 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 17 - 00524 - CV

——————————— FREDDIE LEE WALKER , Appella nt

V. DAVID GUTIERREZ, CHA IRMAN OF THE TEXAS B OARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES; ROY A. (TONY) GARCIA , COMMISSIONER; WANDA SALIAGAS, COMM ISSIONER; AND FEDERI CO RANGEL,

BOARD MEMBER , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 200th District Court

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. D - 1 - GN - 17 - 001513

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellees’ motion to dismiss, signed June 15, 2017. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellant’s brief was originally due in August 2017. In October, the court2

issued an order denying appellant’s motion concerning production of records under Rule 196, and we forwarded appellant a copy of the record. We set the brief due on November 13, 2017. No brief was filed. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond and has not filed a brief
or soug ht an extension of time

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justice s Massengale and Brown.
Q2 2014 STIP Amendment






Exhibit 10.51
AMENDMENT TO 
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(Effective January 1, 2014)
The Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:
The phrase “(or if such January 1 is not a trading day, the first trading day preceding such January 1)” in Section 4.3(c) of the Plan is hereby replaced with the following phrase: “(or if such January 1 is not a trading day, the first trading day after such January 1)”
This amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2014.


	
					
	 
	WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 
	/s/ Laura M. Franklin
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Executive Vice President - Accounting and Administration

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	July 31, 2014
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07

- 19

- 00332

- CR

ROBIN LEANN POWELL , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 242nd District Court

Hale County , Texas Trial Court No. B20247

- 1606 , Honorable Kregg Hukill , Presiding



### March 19 , 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN , C.J. , and PIRTLE and PARKER , JJ. Robin Leann Powell , appellant , appeals the order revoking her probation. After a guilty plea for forgery of a financial instrument , appellant was placed on four years ’ probation. Subsequently , the State filed a Motion to Revoke and a hearing was held on

same. After appellant pled tr ue to the State ’ s allegations and testimony was presented in support of the allegations , the trial court found the allegations to be true , revoked appellant ’ s probation and sentenced her to ten months in a State Jail facility. Appellant filed an appeal.2

Appellant ’ s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw together with an Anders 1 brief

. Through those documents , he certifies to the C ourt that , after diligently searching the record , the appeal is without merit. A ccompanying the brief and motion is a copy of a letter sent by counsel to appellant informing the latter of counsel ’ s belief that there i s no reversible error an d of appellant ’ s right to file a response , pro se , to counsel ’ s Anders brief. So too did couns el provide appellant with a copy of the clerk ’ s and reporter ’ s records , according to the letter. By letter dated February 11 , 2020 , this C ourt notified appellant of h er right to file h er own brief or response by March 12 , 2020 , if s he wished to do so. To date , no response has been received. In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders , appellate counsel discussed potential area s for appeal. However , he then explained why the issues lacked merit. W e conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel ’ s conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) , and Stafford v. Sta te , 813 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (en banc). No issues of arguable merit were uncovered , however. Accordingly , the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed. 2

Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish.

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744

- 45 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).

2 Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JORGE HUMBERTO ZARAGOZA

FUENTES

,

Appellant

,

v.

PEDRO ZARAGOZA FUENTES,

RANCHO PRODUCTOR DE LECHE

, ZARAGOZA HERMANOS, S.A. DE

C.V.

, & ZARGEO INC.,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00289

- CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012

- DCV04174 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant, Jorge Humberto Zaragoza

Fuentes , to dismiss his appeal pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

July 18, 2018

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          61,218
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   26,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       740
<INVENTORY>                                                    150,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               244,788
<PP&E>                                                         149,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  29,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 370,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           51,358
<BONDS>                                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        18,359
<OTHER-SE>                                                     187,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   370,433
<SALES>                                                        397,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               397,217
<CGS>                                                          208,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  359,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               2,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 35,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    14,018
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             21,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    21,664
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     1.18



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

FORE Systems, Inc. owns, either directly or indirectly, through another
wholly-owned subsidiary, equity interests in each of the following companies
which do business under their respective corporate names:


FORE Systems Worldwide, Inc.                         Delaware
FORE Systems Holding Corporation                     Delaware
FORE Systems Federal, Inc.                           Delaware
Network Control Technologies, Inc.                   Delaware
Alantec International, Inc.                          California
FORE Systems Technology, Inc.                        Delaware
FORE Systems International, Inc.                     Barbados
FORE Systems Japan, Inc.                             Japan
Nunlow Limited                                       Ireland
Nemesys Holding Corporation                          Delaware
Nemesys Research                                     United Kingdom
FORE Systems B.V.                                    Netherlands
FORE Systems S.A.R.L.                                France
FORE Systems GmbH                                    Federal Republic of Germany
FORE Systems Limited                                 United Kingdom
FORE Systems ApS                                     Denmark
FORE Systems B.V.B.A.                                Belgium
FORE Systems AG                                      Switzerland
FORE Systems Limited                                 Hong Kong
FORE Systems Limited                                 Bermuda
FORE Systems Limited                                 Canada
FORE Systems AB                                      Sweden
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56750-56751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [70 FR 55638, 
September 22, 2005]

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

DATE AND TIME OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING: Monday, September 19, 
2005.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Additional Item.
    The following item has been added to the Closed Meeting scheduled 
for Thursday, September 29, 2005:

Formal order of investigation.

    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider this item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session and

[[Page 56751]]

that no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 23, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19499 Filed 9-26-05; 1:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement File Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464,  333-15043, 333-64185, 33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754, 333-30427, 333-64187, 333-50526, and  333-58272 on Form S-8 of PSS World Medical, Inc. of our report dated
May 22, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of PSS World Medical, Inc. as of March 29, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended March 29, 2002
and the related schedule, which report appears in the March 29, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of PSS World Medical, Inc.





KPMG LLP





Jacksonville, Florida


June 26, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Labor Relations Authority

# AGENCY:

Federal Labor Relations Authority. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the members of the Performance Review Board. 

# DATES:

September 29, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jill M. Crumpacker, Acting Executive Director, Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA); 1400 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20424-0001; (202) 218-7945. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. (as amended by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978) requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more Performance Review Boards (PRB). Section 4314(c)(4) requires that notice of appointment of the PRB be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

As required by 5 CFR 430.310, Chairman Dale Cabaniss has appointed the following executives to serve on the 2005-2006 PRB for the FLRA, beginning September 2005 through September 2006: 

Frank Battle, Deputy Director of Administration, National Labor Relations Board; Jill Crumpacker, Acting Executive Director, Federal Labor Relations Authority; 

Russell G. Harris, Deputy Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor; 

Mary Johnson, General Counsel, National Mediation Board; 

Steve Nelson, Director, Office of Policy and Evaluation, Merit Systems Protection Board; 

Don Todd, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Labor-Management Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.

Authority:5 U.S.C. 4134(c)(4). 

Dated: September 26, 2005. 

Jill M. Crumpacker, 

Acting Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 05-19487 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6727-01-P
#### John Q. ADAMS et al., Individually and as representatives of and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated hereinafter referred to as “class members”, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lamar R. SMITH, in his official capacity as Tax Commissioner of Douglas County, Georgia, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 76-3052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 2, 1978.

G. Michael Hartley, Douglasville, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Wm. C. Tinsley, II, Douglasville, Ga., for Douglas Co.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., R. Douglas Lackey, H. Perry Michael, Asst. Attys. Gen., Robert S. Stubbs, II, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard L. Chambers, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gerald W. Bowling, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, GODBOLD, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants contend that Georgia law does not provide a “plain, speedy, and efficient” remedy in state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1341 for challenging their property tax assessments, and that the district court therefore should not have dismissed their suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We disagree and affirm the district court’s dismissal of this suit on the basis of Judge Hill’s well-reasoned opinion reported at 415 F.Supp. 787 (D.C.Ga.1976).

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3812 

To repeal sections 1341 and 1342 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2014 

Mr. COFFMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal sections 1341 and 1342 of the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Bailouts for Insur5 ance Industry Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3812 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTIONS 1341 AND 1342 OF THE PA2 TIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE 

3 ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1341 and 1342 of the 

5 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 18061, 18062) are each repealed. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeals made by sub8 section (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act, but the repeal of sections 1341 and 1342 shall 

10 not apply to plan years and calendar years, respectively, 

11 beginning before such date of enactment. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 277/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 277 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5913 October 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 277

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5913 October 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1788 of 14 July 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of requirements for vehicle EU type-approval, and amending and correcting Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) No 1322/2014, (EU) 2015/96, (EU) 2015/68 and (EU) 2015/208 with regard to vehicle construction and general requirements, to environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements, to vehicle braking requirements and to vehicle functional safety requirements  (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1789 of 7 September 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/504 with regard to the administrative requirements for the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles  (
  1
  ) | 60 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1788 of 14 July 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of requirements for vehicle EU type-approval, and amending and correcting Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) No 1322/2014, (EU) 2015/96, (EU) 2015/68 and (EU) 2015/208 with regard to vehicle construction and general requirements, to environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements, to vehicle braking requirements and to vehicle functional safety requirements  (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1789 of 7 September 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/504 with regard to the administrative requirements for the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles  (
  1
  )

1

60

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.