alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: October 13, 2005.
    Location: Heathman Lodge, 7801 NE Greenwood Drive, Vancouver, 
Washington 98662, (1-360-254-3100).
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 12 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the 
funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund. The Board will also consider its priorities for 
the next fiscal year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CEMP-POD, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-1934.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statement with the 
committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19270 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
In the MATTER OF: J.C.C.

No. COA17-163

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Tae Kwon HAMMONDS

389A15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 20, 2017

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammonds, Tae Kwon.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

John R. Rittelmeyer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Disability Rights North Carolina, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of April 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of April 2017."
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Simon Defense Inc. 

Under Contract No. SPE7L3-17-P-0429 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62068 

Mr. C. James Calleson 

President 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Colleen T. Loughran, Esq. 

Adam J. Heer, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

DLA Land and Maritime 

Columbus, OH 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 

On July 26, 2019, the Board ordered appellant, within 21 days, to file its complaint or 

notify the Board if more time was needed and why. The Order was sent to appellant by U.S. 

mail to the business address provided by C. James Calleson, appellant's President and 

Director of Operations, but was returned to the Board as undeliverable. On August 23, 

2019, the Board attempted to contact appellant by telephone using three different numbers 

associated'with appellant, but was unsuccessful. The Board then emailed appellant on the 

same date requesting updated contact information, but appellant did not respond. 

On September 3, 2019, the Board emailed appellant using appellant's business email 

address and Mr. Calleson's personal email address, again requesting appellant contact the 

Board, but did not receive a reply. On September 4, 2019, the Board ordered appellant, 

within 21 days, to either file a complaint or show cause why the appeal should not be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Order was sent to appellant by email to appellant's 

email address, Mr. Calleson's personal email address, and by certified U.S. Postal Service 

mail. This Order was returned to the Board as undeliverable. 

Appellant has failed to respond to Board Orders dated July 26, 2019 and September 4, 

2019, and has repeatedly failed to respond to the Board's emails requesting updated 
contact information. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice under Board 

Rule 17 for failure to prosecute. 

Dated: October 2, 2019 

I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

ministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur /,,.--- / 

OWEN C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62068, Appeal of Simon Defense Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
State of North Carolina v. Marvin Hakeem Johnson

No. COA15-732

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     Solely for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  I, the
undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer of Sew Cal Logo,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report"):

     1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: and

     2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Richard Songer
---------------------------
    Richard Songer
    Chief Executive Officer
    November 30, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4217 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4217

To prohibit a reduction in funding for the defense commissary system in 
 fiscal year 2015 pending the report of the Military Compensation and 
                  Retirement Modernization Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2014

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit a reduction in funding for the defense commissary system in 
 fiscal year 2015 pending the report of the Military Compensation and 
                  Retirement Modernization Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Commissary Sustainment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REDUCTION IN FUNDING FOR THE DEFENSE COMMISSARY 
              SYSTEM IN FISCAL YEAR 2015 PENDING THE REPORT OF THE 
              MILITARY COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT MODERNIZATION 
              COMMISSION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the monthly amount of 
funds made available by the Department of Defense for the defense 
commissary system during fiscal year 2015 may not be reduced below the 
average monthly amount of funds made available for that system during 
fiscal year 2014 until the date of the report of the Military 
Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission under section 
674(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1792).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATES OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     Solely for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  I, the
undersigned  Chief  Financial  Officer of Sew Cal Logo,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 (the "Report"):

     1. Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: and

     2.  That  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Judy Songer
----------------------------------
    Judy Songer
    Chief Financial Officer
    April 14, 2005
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1904/2004

of 29 October 2004         

fixing the export refunds on malt

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on malt listed in Article 1(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 29 October 2004 fixing the export refunds on malt

----
State of North Carolina v. Jennifer Marie Wilson

No. COA16-496

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
POOR SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD. v. FRANKLIN

293P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 2017

Rita Franklin, for Franklin, Guy E., et al.

D. Kyle Deak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Poor Substitute Trustee, LTD.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of August 2017 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2017."
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trai Thien USA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haley Manchester, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: December 22, 2010 /s/ Haley Manchester Haley Manchester Chief Executive Officer
HILDEBRAN HERITAGE & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. v. The TOWN OF HILDEBRAN, et al.

134A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2017

Jason White, Attorney at Law, Amber Mueggenburg, Hickory, for Hildebran Heritage & Development Association, Inc., et al.

Lawrence D. McMahon, Jr., Attorney at Law, Morganton, G. Redman Dill, Jr., Attorney at Law, for The Town of Hildebran.

James B. Hogan, Attorney at Law, Morganton, for Foothills Recycling & Demolition, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of May 2017 by Plaintiffs:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of May 2017. Each Party to bear it's own costs."
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00314

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E STATE FARM LLOYDS AND DAVID R. CABE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Per Curiam Order

Relator s State Farm Lloyds and David R. Cabe f iled a petition for writ of mandamus

in the above cause on July 10, 2015 through which they contend that the trial court erred

in refusing to grant summary judgment in thei r favor where the parties in the underlying

proceeding have allegedly resolved their issues through a contractual appraisal process

.

T he Court requests that the r eal part ies in interest, Horacio Salinas and Maria Salinas, or

any others whose interest woul d be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date

of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

14th day of July , 201 5

.
STATE of North Carolina v. Eliazar Juan MENDOZA

No. 9P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Christopher A. Beechler, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Jasmine M. Pitt, Attorney at Law, for Mendoza, Eliazar Juan.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of January 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
Le RMAH, Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Maureen Mihans, Defendants.

No. COA17-131

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

DISMISSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Calvin JONES

No. 158P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Mr. David W. Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jones, Henry Calvin.

Mr. Alvin William Keller, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of May 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of May 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2008 – Cantieri Navali Termoli v Commission**

**(Case T-70/07)**

State aid – Shipbuilding – Operating aid linked to contracts for ships – Application for extension of ship delivery limit under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 – Causal link between the exceptional event and the delay

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Grounds – Lack of or inadequate statement of reasons – Distinguished from manifest error of assessment
(Art. 253 EC) (see para. 37)*

2.                     *State aid – Not allowed – Exceptions – Shipbuilding aid (Council Regulation No 1540/98, Art. 3(2)) (see paras 53-58)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/948/EC of 4 July 2006 on State aid which Italy plans to implement for Cantieri Navali Termoli SpA (OJ 2006 L 383, p. 53). |

**Operative part:**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cantieri Navali Termoli SpA to pay the costs. |
ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE & URGENT CARE, PA, et al. v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

427A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 18, 2017

Camden R. Webb, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth Connolly Stone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Abrons Family Practice And Urgent Care, PA, et al.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, Bryan Starrett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Computer Sciences Corporation.

Mark S. Thomas, Attorney at Law.

Matthew Jordan Cochran, Attorney at Law, Thomas E. Cone, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Curtis B. Venable, Attorney at Law, Stephen J. White, Attorney at Law, for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of May 2017 by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Duke University Medical Center, Mission Hospitals, Inc., the Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation, North Carolina Baptist Hospital, and WakeMed for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of May 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
STATE of North Carolina v. Linzie Lee SWINK

No. 113P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

W. Michael Spivey, Attorney at Law, for Swink, Linzie Lee.

Jennifer T. Harrod, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th of April 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of April 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Parent
------

TF Financial Corporation

                                               Percentage        Jurisdiction of
Subsidiaries                                   Owned             Incorporation
------------                                   ----------        -------------

Third Federal Savings Bank (a)                 100%              United States

TF Investments Corporation (a)                 100%              Delaware

Teragon Financial Corporation (a)              100%              Pennsylvania

Penns Trail Development Corporation (a)        100%              Delaware

Third Delaware Corporation (a) (b)             100%              Delaware

---------------
(a)  The  operations  of  this  subsidiary  are  included  in  the  consolidated
     financial  statements  contained in the 2003 Annual Report to  Stockholders
     incorporated herein by reference.

(b)  Third Delaware  Corporation  is a wholly-owned  subsidiary of Third Federal
     Savings Bank.
In the MATTER OF: P.L.B.

No. COA16-1116

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
**Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 July 2010 – Agrofert Holding v Commission**

**(Case T-111/07)**

Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a procedure concerning a merger between undertakings – Refusal to grant access

European Union – Institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(2), 1st to
3rd indents, 3 and 6) (see paras 58-61, 64, 76-77, 79-80, 89, 94-99, 101-104, 110-116, 124-129, 131-132, 141-142, 144)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of, first, the Commission’s decision of 2 August 2006 refusing the applicant access to documents concerning the notification and pre notification procedure in relation to the acquisition of Unipetrol by Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA (COMP/M.3543) and, second, Commission Decision D (2007) 1360 of 13 February 2007 confirming that refusal. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that the head of claim seeking annulment of the reply of the European Commission of 2 August 2006 and that requesting the Court to order the Commission to provide the applicant with the documents requested are inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Annuls Commission Decision D (2007) 1360 of 13 February 2007 refusing access to documents in Case COMP/M.3543 concerning the merger between Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA and Unipetrol, exchanged between the Commission and the notifying parties and between the Commission and third parties, and refusing access to the internal documents and legal advice drawn up in that case; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the Commission to pay the costs; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4. | | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Denmark and Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen to bear their own respective costs. |