alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3927 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3927

 To amend section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, to raise to at 
least the poverty line the amount of Social Security benefits that are 
         exempt from being offset to satisfy student loan debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, to raise to at 
least the poverty line the amount of Social Security benefits that are 
         exempt from being offset to satisfy student loan debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO RAISE TO THE POVERTY LINE THE AMOUNT OF SOCIAL 
              SECURITY BENEFITS THAT ARE EXEMPT FROM BEING OFFSET TO 
              SATISFY STUDENT LOAN DEBT.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 3716(c)(3) of title 31, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by inserting after ``except as provided 
        in clause (ii)'' the following: ``or clause (iii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``(iii) For purposes of clause (ii), in the case of a claim for 
student loan debt, in lieu of the exemption amount of $9,000 applicable 
with respect to payments due an individual under the Social Security 
Act, the amount of the poverty line shall be the exemption amount. For 
purposes of this clause--
            ``(I) the term `student loan debt' means the outstanding 
        balance of principal or interest owed on any loan made, 
        insured, or guaranteed under title IV of the Higher Education 
        Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.); and
            ``(II) the term `poverty line' means the annual poverty 
        guideline for the applicable calendar year (as updated annually 
        in the Federal Register by the Department of Health and Human 
        Services under the authority of section 673(2) of the Omnibus 
        Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981) as applicable to a single 
        individual for the year in which the exemption under clause 
        (ii) is applied.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to payments made under the Social Security Act after the 
date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009267EN.01006001.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/60

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Offshore Legends v OHIM — Acteon (OFFSHORE LEGENDS in black and white and OFFSHORE LEGENDS in blue, black and green)

(Joined Cases T-305/07 and T-306/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for two Community figurative marks OFFSHORE LEGENDS, one in black and white, the other in blue, black and green - Earlier national figurative mark OFFSHORE 1 - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of goods and signs - Absence of request for proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 in conjunction with Article 15(2)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) and point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2009/C 267/104

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Offshore Legends (Nevele, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and N. Clarembeaux, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Acteon (Saint-Tropez, France) (represented by: M. Milon, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 May 2007 (Case R 1031/2006-2 and Case R 1038/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Acteon and Offshore Legends

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the actions;

| 2. | orders Offshore Legends to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Offshore Legends to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Austin R. KELLETT Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 2000178

Decided: 25 November 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges : Stephen F. Keane (arraignment) Jeffrey V. Munoz (trial)
Sentence adjudged 23 April 2020 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 100 days , forfeiture of $ 1,155 .00 pay per month for 4 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Thomas P. Belsky , JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Kellett , NMCCA No. 20 20 001 78 Opinion of the Co urt

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Cod e of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

. 1

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Cou rt

1 We note that the civilian trial defense counsel [CDC] was not sworn by either mi litary judge as required by D ep ’ t of the N avy, J udge A dvocate G eneral I nstr

. 5800.7F , Manual of the Judge Advocate General , p ara. 0130. a (3) ( C h

- 3 , M ar. 30, 2020 ) . However, CDC was a retired O

- 5 Marine judge advocate who was previously certified in accordance with Article 27(b), UCMJ , and sworn in accordance with Article 42(a), UCMJ. Under these circumstances, we find that CDC was qualified in accordance with A r ticle 38 ( b ) , UC MJ , and R ule for C ourts

- M artial 502 ( d )( 2 )(B) an d discern no prejudice

. W e thus find it unnecessary to take corrective action.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCT 17, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12697

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00036-CR-01-WCO-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO PENA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(October 17, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alberto Pena-Lopez challenges his sentence of 12 months of imprisonment
after revocation of his supervised release. Pena-Lopez argues that his sentence is

unreasonable because the district court failed to consider that he re-entered the

United States illegally to support his family. We affirm.

We review a sentence imposed after revocation of supervised release for

reasonableness. See United States v. Sweeting, 437 F.3d 1105, 1106–07 (11th Cir.

2006). We review the reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion.

Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). “[T]he party who challenges the

sentence bears the burden of establishing that the sentence is unreasonable in the

light of both [the] record and the factors in section 3553(a).” United States v.

Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence within

the guideline range. Pena-Lopez entered the country illegally, which violated a

term of his supervised release. The district court stated that Pena-Lopez’s

recidivist conduct was “an act of defiance or [a] deliberate violation of the law”

that it found “disturbing.” The nature and circumstances of an offense and the

history and characteristics of a defendant are relevant to fashion an appropriate

sentence. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3); United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d

739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007). Pena-Lopez’s sentence is reasonable.

AFFIRMED.

2
null

350.23566
#### Frank D. Gallik, Plaintiff, *v.*Pepsi Cola New York Bottling Company, Inc., Defendant.

City Court of New York, Special Term, New York County,

June 1, 1943.

*Thomas O. Perrella*and *John P. Smith*for defendant.

*Max M. Meltzer*for plaintiff.

Kahn, J.

The action will not be dismissed for lack of prosecution while the plaintiff is in the armed forces. The motion is denied with leave to renew if it be shown that plaintiff is no longer in the army.
Lawrence Crowder, Employee, Plaintiff v. Baldor Electric, Employer, Self-Insured (Gallagher Bassett Services, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant.

No. COA16-403

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
Le RMAH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and Maureen Mihans, Defendants.

No. COA16-848

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

DISMISSED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Deconnis U'Seff-Rah SIMMONS, Defendant.

No. COA16-255

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

NO ERROR.
COURTNEY NC LLC v. BALDWIN

219P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Monette Baldwin, for Baldwin, Monette.

A. Bartlett White, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephanie D'Atri, Attorney at Law, for Courtney NC, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of August 2017 by Defendant to Enlarge Time to Accept Response and Motion to Treat Petition for Writ of Supersedeas to Petition for Certiorari to Review Order:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Beasley, J. and Morgan, J. recused
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1

                         C-CUBE MICROSYSTEMS INC.
                                     
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
             Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
                 (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                  Quarter Ended               Year Ended
                                   December 31,              December 31,
                              ----------------------     --------------------
                                 1996         1995          1996       1995
                              ---------    ---------     --------    --------
Net income (loss)             $  17,285    $   9,138     $(73,045)   $ 24,895
                              =========    =========     ========    ========
Weighted average common 
   shares outstanding            35,821       32,323       33,928      31,819
Common share equivalents 
   related to stock options       2,827        3,502        n/a         2,832
                              ---------    ---------     --------    --------
Weighted average common and 
   equivalent shares             38,648       35,825       33,928      34,651
                              =========    =========     ========    ========
Net income (loss) per share       $0.45        $0.26       $(2.15)      $0.72
                              =========    =========     ========    ========
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 41 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood 
                           Insurance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL FLOOD 
              INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``$20,725,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$30,425,000,000''.
    (b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the 
Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of S. 
Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget 
for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant to section 4(g) of 
the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)).

            Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood 
                           Insurance Program.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4271 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4271

   To authorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States to use 3 
          percent of its profits for administrative expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2014

   Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Kuster, and Mr. Garcia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States to use 3 
          percent of its profits for administrative expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing American Jobs Through 
More Exports Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE EXPORT-IMPORT BANK TO USE 3 PERCENT OF ITS 
              PROFITS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    Section 3 of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635a) is 
amended by adding at the end the following;
    ``(k) Authority To Use Portion of Bank Surplus for Administrative 
Expenses.--
            ``(1) Authority.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in 
                addition to any other amounts that the Bank may use to 
                cover administrative expenses of the Bank, the Bank may 
                use not more than 3 percent of the surplus (as defined 
                in subsection (j)(2), without regard to subparagraph 
                (B)(ii) of such subsection) of the Bank, for each 
                fiscal year in the 5-year period beginning with the 
                date of the enactment of this paragraph, to cover 
                administrative expenses of the Bank.
                    ``(B) Use for regional offices.--Of the amount of 
                the surplus which may be used as provided in 
                subparagraph (A), the Bank shall use at least \1/3\ to 
                expand or establish regional offices of the Bank.
            ``(2) Subject to appropriations.--The authority provided by 
        paragraph (1) may be exercised only to such extent and in such 
        amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Sheldon Reinhart , Principal Accounting Officer of ICPSolar Technologies Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ICP Solar Technologies Inc.; 

2. 

Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. 

The registrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) 

designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; 

b) 

evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c) 

disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. 

The registrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) 

all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of our financialreporting internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) 

any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.Date: June 23, 2008 

/s/*Sheldon Reinhart                     *Sheldon Reinhart Principal Accounting Officer 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-51625, 333-86509, 333-50214, and 333-33192), and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-83064, 333-03889, 333-28151, 333-58907, 333-61738,
333-78523, and 333-48220) pertaining to Targeted Genetics Corporations 1992 Restated Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors, 1999 Stock Option Plan and Genovo Roll-Over Stock Option Plan, of Targeted Genetics
Corporation and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 14, 2002, except for the last two paragraphs of Note 1, as to which the date is July 29, 2002 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form 10-K/A.





/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Seattle, Washington


August 13, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7705
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OGDEN DOREMUS KING, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CR-90-138-N, CA-95-897-N) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ogden Doremus King, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. King , Nos. CR-90-138-N; CA-95-897-N (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00271

- CV

Villa D e Leon Condominiums, LLC,

Patten Sales and Marketing, LLC,

and Bill Bridges, Jr.

v.

Michael Stewart and Carrie Stewart §

§

§

§

§ From the 153rd District Court

of T arrant County (153

- 269987

- 14)

February 19, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

Concurrence by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and hol ds that

there was error in the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to compel

arbitration and stay the trial court proceedings . It is ordered that the order of the

trial court is reversed and the ca u se is remanded to the trial court to render an

order in accordance with this opinion

.

It is further ordered that appellees Michael Stewart and Carrie Stewart

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston