alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00440-CR

Marcus Jerome Blackman, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 61821, HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Marcus Jerome Blackmun pleaded guilty to the offense of attempted burglary of a

habitation. See Tex. Penal Code § 30.02 (West 2003). The district court deferred adjudication

and placed Blackmun on community supervision for five years. Subsequently, the State filed

a motion to adjudicate. At the hearing on the State’s motion, Blackmun pleaded true to violating

18 conditions of his community supervision. The district court found the allegations in the State’s

motion to be true, adjudicated Blackmun guilty, and sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief

concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the

record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
2

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s

brief and was advised of hisright to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se

brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: October 17, 2008

Do Not Publish
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and United Bank & Trust Company, Versailles, Ky., f/k/a Farmers Bank & Trust Company (Georgetown, Ky.), Plaintiffs, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; Shrijee LLC; Helm Builders, LLC and Michael D. Andrews, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Durham County, North Carolina, Defendants.

No. COA15-444.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in part; Reversed and Remanded in part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6734

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

STEVEN NADROSKI, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00027-RAJ-JEB-2; 4:07-cv-00115-RAJ) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Steven Nadroski, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Steven Nadroski seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Nadroski has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny Nadroski’s motion for a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We further 

deny Nadroski’s motion for appointment of counsel. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21



List of Subsidiaries of PSS World Medical, Inc.



|                                              |  |                    |  |                                                 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Name of Domestic Subsidiary                   |  | State of Formation |  | (Names under which Subsidiary conducts business)
|Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc.               |  | Delaware           |  |                                                 
|Physician Sales & Service, Inc.               |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|Physician Sales & Service Limited Partnership |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|PSS Holding, Inc.                             |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|PSS Service, Inc.                             |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|ThriftyMed, Inc.                              |  | Florida            |  |                                                 
|WorldMed Shared Services, Inc.                |  | Florida            |  | PSS World Medical Shared Services, Inc.         
|Proclaim, Inc.                                |  | Tennessee          |  |                                                 
|Ancillary Management Solutions, Inc.          |  | Tennessee          |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                ------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
SouthCrest Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
                                       -------
2005 (the " Periodic Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the
            ---------------
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005


/s/ Douglas J. Hertha

-------------------------------
Douglas J. Hertha
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sheldon
Reinhart , Principal Accounting Officer of ICP Solar Technologies Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ICP Solar Technologies Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of our financial reporting internal controls which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.

Date: September 15, 2008

/s/ Sheldon Reinhart---------------------------------- 
Sheldon Reinhart 
Principal Accounting Officer

---
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer    I, Stephen B. Schneer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Develocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: October 17, 2008   /s/ Stephen B. Schneer Stephen B. Schneer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |        |  |                                  
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------
|                   |  |        |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Curtis W. Mewbourne              
|Date: May 13, 2008 |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                   |  |        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
In the Matter of: M.Z.M., T.Q.N.C.

No. COA16-705

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1114 (Serial No. 77/006,212) IN RE JAMES T. KIRBY Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

ON MOTION ORDER James T. Kirby moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT 

### MAY 1 8 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: James Scott Gerien, Esq Raymond T. Chen, Esq. MAY 18_2009 s17 JAN HORIMLY 

### MAY 18 2009 CLERK ISSUED AS A MANDATE: 

# 911191taltr"
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Hon.EonmrD. Eok 

### County AudItor Fayette county la ffrtxnge,

Texas Dear Mr; Eokr

and inhoreIn quo tdlatehaa been reaelved

oplnlon a va!l088 ounty, Tar, Is lzke to 18mm a ty1lJceHarria ofri0ed srw **ISV,** ae or thicl ahtmaater wore,1=r8prting
the orrioer 8ervhg the 8~bp0ena entitled toa reet

OOUnty 

### or the State or Texan be llable 

### rorthe a083 * Ut3ale 968, Code or Criminal Proaedure or Texe~, ig2!je ppoVide8 88 **r0iiOVS:**

"Any Juatioe of the Peasoeah811 be authorlred, and it shall **be** his duty, tohold lnqucmta vithout a jury v1thl.nhis oountg, in the following emmistBon. Homer D/ Eck, ~8s 2

"1. “2.



### “3.

“4. When a pernon die8 in prison When my person 18 killed, or rrom gny cause **die8** an unnatural death, except 

### under 8entence of the lav, or in ,thesbrense of on8 ormore good vitmsser , Xhsn the body ora human being is round, anl thr olroumsw@lo6e or his death as6 uuknowa. m6n the airaum8tanors of th6 death or any p6rron 

### em euaha6 to load to suspluion th6t he oams to his death by unlawiul .msanae Arti 

### 974, 'orda coQ0, provide8 a8 r0iiaw8: Vh6 Juatlcr may 186ur'rabpo6nas to 6nforoe tba attandano6 ofwltn68aar upon an luquaat and may ieeur attadhmants ror tho86.~ubpor.~l,d,,,wRho ~a11 to sttena.* " ~,.~ ,. w6 oan rind no r66~allm~d by rtmtuts ror the 6x8outlon or suoh rubp08na8,or *ttaahmuntr in lnqu88te or thl8 nature.

TO entitb an oriioar -ton08i~8 r6e8 or 0cdd88i0118, th6 r6oelpt thsreoi must ha+6 

### barnprovldod for and the 

### amount flx6d by law. )I.Texas JUP. D* 522.

As inqa68ta upon drsa bodl68 am not telony proosrdinga w0 knaw **0r** no 8tatutorp authority rar tb6 peym6nt or 'by6ithsr the State or a oounty to 

### wltne8se8attending such

### re08 h6arlnge. 

### Themfore, in aDdu6r to your qa6atlon8, you are advleed that nelthar the ofiiarr 86~11~ tha aooaee nor th6 wltn688 eatsndlng ths hsarlng would ba 6ntltled 

### to a f66.

WI sugg68t that IllldUr 8 grand $lq inv68tlgation **0r** thl8matter, lr any iorsstlgatlon be nsorrsary,,material wltL436888**’**

Hona Homer I).

### ECk, page 3



### mSidh& outaids tha aountg oould be subpoenaed, or attached, to appear before the grand jury, and the offloer ser+lng such process, ii he **is** 

### on

### atee **ba8i.8,** 

### would be antltlsd to hia ies, also **SUOh** 

### witneeess would beentitled to mlleage andper diem. 

### For tb proper **find** 

### out Orwhlah saoh officera* fees are to be paid 

### ia aountlsa operating on a salary basis, BOBthe sncloaed copy Ofour Opinion NO.O-155.



### Trusting this satisfaotorily answers your l.nqul.rg, WB.sre Yours very ,truly ATTORNEY

OEIiNRAL

OFTEXAS

APPROVE

JUL13. 19&A (8) %Oe P;lB&k&u (Aotlng) A~oR&?N13NERAL APPROVXD OPINIONCOMKITTBE BY(8) BWB,cEIAm
# C_2009233EN.01001401.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/14

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 June 2009 — Krcova v Court of Justice

(Case T-498/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Probationary period - Extension of the probationary period - End of probation report - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)

2009/C 233/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Erika Krcova (Trnava, Slovakia) (represented by: J. Rooy, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented by: M. Schauss initially, then A.V. Placco, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2007 in Case F-112/06 Krcova v Court of Justice ECR-SC I-A-0000, for that judgment to be set aside.

Krcova

Court of Justice

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Erika Krcova to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Communities before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Erika Krcova to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Communities before the Court of First Instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
State of North Carolina v. Jennifer Nicole Ferrell

No. COA16-622

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4001 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out certain activities to 

prevent the interbasin transfer of aquatic invasive species between the 

Great Lakes and Mississippi River, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2014 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out certain 

activities to prevent the interbasin transfer of aquatic 

invasive species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi 

River, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Against 

5 Aquatic Invasive Species Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HYDROLOGIC SEPARATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army is au8 thorized to carry out projects necessary to separate the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4001 IH

1 hydrologic connection between the Great Lakes and Mis2 sissippi River basins to prevent the interbasin transfer of 

3 aquatic invasive species. 

4 (b) TIMING.— 

5 (1) DESIGN.—Not later than 180 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 

7 undertake design activities necessary to carry out 

8 the projects authorized under subsection (a). 

9 (2) CONSTRUCTION.—Not later than 180 days 

10 after the date on which design activities undertaken 

11 under paragraph (1) are completed, the Secretary 

12 shall begin construction of the projects authorized 

13 under subsection (a). 

14 (c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out projects au15 thorized under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult 

16 with the— 

17 (1) Secretary of the Interior; 

18 (2) Governors of Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, 

19 Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wis20 consin; 

21 (3) Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of 

22 Greater Chicago; 

23 (4) Great Lakes Commission; 

24 (5) Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4001 IH

1 (6) Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initia2 tive. 

3 (d) NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.—The Secretary may 

4 enter into agreements with non-Federal interests to assist 

5 the carrying out of projects authorized under subsection 

6 (a). 

7 (e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

8 of a project carried out under this section may be up to 

9 100 percent. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Ailkeem Anthony NORMAN

No. COA16-1005

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 2, 2017

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL IN 13 CRS 050005; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING IN 13 CRS 50004.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

J.D., the father

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 1358

[ August 9, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Hope Tieman Bristol , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016

- 5021

DP

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel

, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional
Counsel

, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, f or appellant.

Stephanie L. Serafin of Kreusler

- Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beach, Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee, Tallahassee , for appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn
Schwarz , As sistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee Department of Children & Families.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In the Matter of: T.H.H.

No. COA16-301

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED.