alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer    I, Paul Tidwell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: September 19, 2011  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00575-CV

Ronald Dixon, Appellant

v.

Kathy Alice Berke, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 08-586-F425, HONORABLE MARK J. SILVERSTONE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Ronald Dixon has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw his notice

of appeal and dismiss the instant appeal. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 10, 2008
*

After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary.  Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record.  See FED. R. APP. P.

34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Submitted October 2, 2008*

Decided October 2, 2008

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐1498

LARRY D. KEMP,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of the

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Defendant‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

No. 06‐cv‐0282‐MJR

Michael J. Reagan,

Judge.

O R D E R

In 2004, following a series of negative performance evaluations, the Department of

Veterans Affairs discharged Larry Kemp, a 56‐year‐old cemetery caretaker supervisor.

Kemp responded with this action, alleging age discrimination in violation of the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623(a), and unlawful retaliation.  But

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08‐1498 Page 2

Kemp’s suit did not survive summary judgment.  In its order the court noted that Kemp

lacked any direct evidence of discrimination and that the circumstantial evidence that Kemp

presented was not enough to permit a jury to infer intentional discrimination under the

direct method of proof.  See Atanus v. Perry, 520 F.3d 662, 671‐73 (7th Cir. 2008).  Moreover,

the court wrote, Kemp could not establish a prima facie case under the indirect method of

proof because he had not shown that younger, similarly situated individuals had received

superior treatment.  See id.  As for his second count, Kemp could not point to a statutorily

protected activity as the basis for retaliation, so that claim perished as well.

Kemp’s pro se brief is vexing.  As far as we can tell, his sole argument is that as a

government actor Judge Reagan could not act impartially in this case brought against the

federal government (actually a cabinet secretary).  Kemp asserts that only a jury without

“political ties to the current administration” is fit to consider his case.  As evidence of this

bias, Kemp offers Judge Reagan’s denial of a motion to recruit counsel, see Pruitt v. Mote, 503

F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc), and a portion of the summary‐judgment order in which

the district court acknowledged that Kemp was over 40 at the time of his discharge.

  

This argument is without merit.  It takes more than an adverse ruling to demonstrate

judicial bias, see Grove Fresh Distribs., Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd., 299 F.3d 635, 640 (7th Cir. 2002);

In re Golant, 239 F.3d 931, 938 (7th Cir. 2001), and the record does not bear a hint of animus,

prejudice, or favoritism.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009069EN.01003006.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/30

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 14 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-541/07) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/60)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.

1

---
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00478-CV

Roberto RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

Rosa NILLO, Individually, and as the Independent Executrix of the Estate of Joseph Nillo,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 97-07-14620-CV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 22, 2008

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

When appellant filed this appeal, he was required to pay a $175.00 filing fee. Appellant,

however, did not pay the required filing fee; accordingly, the clerk of this court notified appellant

by letter of the deficiency and advised him the fee was due by July 28, 2008. On September 17,

2008, when the fee remained unpaid, this court ordered that appellant, not later than October 2, 2008,

either: (1) pay the applicable filing fee; or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is excused

by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5;
04-08-00478-CV

-2-

20.1. The court advised appellant that if he failed to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered,

the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee nor responded to our order. We therefore

order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order appellant to bear all costs of

this appeal.

PER CURIAM
STATE v. Eric Glenn LANE

606A05-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 30, 2016

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, dor Lane, Eric Glenn.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 29th of September 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of September 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 11th day of November 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Linwood Wilson v. Joe Curtis

No. 371P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. Linwood E. Wilson, Pro Se.

Mr. Glen D. Bachman, Attorney at Law, For Curtis, Joe.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 10th of October 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of October 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of October 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00331

- CR

John Darrick RITTENBERRY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 1 98th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B20109 Honorable Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On November 1, 2021, appellant filed a letter in this court asking for the appointment of counsel to represent him in this appeal. On November 9, 2021 , we abated this appeal to the trial
court to determine if appellant i s indigent and , if so, to appoin t co unsel to represent him in this appeal

. On November 16, 2021

, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk ’ s record , which contains the trial court ’ s order appointing counsel, M. Patrick Maguire, to represent appe llant in this appeal.
We, therefore, ORDER this appeal reinstated on this court ’s docket

. Appellant’s brief is due on or before December 29, 2021

.

__________________________ _______ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of November, 2021

.

___________________________ ________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
State v. Barry Randall Revels

14A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2017

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Revels, Barry Randall.

Keith Clayton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 24th of January 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of January 2017."
State v. Rayford Lewis Burke

181A93-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Burke, Rayford Lewis.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mikko Red Arrow, Assistant District Attorney, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of July 2016 by Defendant to Supplement the Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016." Ervin, J. recused
RICHMOND v. GEORGE, et al.

196P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 28, 2017

Natalia K. Isenberg, Attorney at Law, Bryan T. Simpson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for George, Robert M.

Paul A. Tharp, Attorney at Law, Matthew R. Arnold, Attorney at Law, J. Bradley Smith, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Richmond, Maeghan.

Patrick H. Flanagan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Sipe, Vidal A., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of June 2017 by Defendant (Robert M. George) for Leave to File Reply to Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petition for Writ of Supersedeas, and Motion for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of July 2017."
ELI GLOBAL, LLC, et al. v. HEAVNER

12PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 3, 2017

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Kendal B. Reed, Attorney at Law, for Eli Global, LLC, et al.

James H. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Richard M. Hutson, II, Attorney at Law, Durham, Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., Attorney *515at Law, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for Heavner, James A.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 31st of March 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of April 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 17th day of May 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements (File Nos. 333-1350 and 333-4242) of Ottawa Financial  Corporation on
Form  S-8  and  in the  Registration  Statement  (File  No.333-4950)  of  Ottawa
Financial  Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated February 26, 1999, on the
financial statements of Ottawa Financial Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and
1997,  and for each of the three years in the period  ended  December  31, 1998,
which report is included in the  Corporation's  1998 Annual  Report on Form 10-K
filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                            /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 30, 1999
Edward F. WILKIE and Debra T. Wilkie v. CITY OF BOILING SPRING LAKES

No. 44PA17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

James P. Cauley, III, Attorney at Law, Wilson, David M. Rief, Attorney at Law, Geneva L. Yourse, Attorney at Law, Cary, Jack Cozort, Attorney at Law, for City of Boiling Spring Lakes.

Kurt Blaine Fryar, Attorney at Law, for Wilkie, Edward F., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 2nd of February 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Inn of the Mountain Gods Resort and Casino (the "Company") does
hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
for the period ended January 31, 2005 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 17, 2005                   By: /s/ Michael French
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Michael French
                                            Chief Executive Officer



Dated: March 17, 2005                   By: /s/ Richard Williams
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Richard Williams
                                            Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 25, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Gao, Chief Executive Officer of BMP Sunstone Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID GAO          
|David Gao              
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 9, 2009
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135627 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135627 

 COA: 281757 

Wayne CC: 06-013482-FC

ISSAC CHARLES BOWENS-FRAZIER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,015

EX PARTE LARRY ALAN NEVIL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 0948446D IN THE 371 DISTRICT COURT st

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted

of assault-family violence, enhanced by a prior family violence conviction, and sentenced to three

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his conviction violates prohibitions against ex post facto laws. The

State agrees. 

The trial court agrees in its findings of fact and conclusions of law filed pursuant to this
2

application, that the conviction violates prohibitions against ex post facto laws. Applicant is entitled

to relief. Scott v. State, 55 S.W.3d 593 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 0948446D in the 371 Judicial District Court st

of Tarrant County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Tarrant

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 8, 2008

Do Not Publish
STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby Lee RAWLINGS

No. 402P14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

John P. Barkley, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Bobby Lee Rawlings, for Rawlings, Bobby Lee.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of December 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wayne County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of December 2016 by Defendant-Appellant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of December 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
Order entered April 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01619-CV

BECKY DREW AND ROBERT KEVIN DREW, Appellants

V.

TEXAS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-12720

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s April 4, 2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 11, 2014. No further extensions will be 

granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE