alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Angel L. RIVERA and wife, Jennifer L. Wilson a/k/a Jennifer Wilson, Defendants.

No. COA16-166

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur TAYLOR, Appellant.

No. ED 81848.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joel A. Block, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Arthur Taylor (“Taylor”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon his convictions of first degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 2000, in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Taylor was sentenced to two concurrent twenty-five year terms of imprisonment.

Taylor argues the trial court plainly erred by not declaring a mistrial *sua sponte*when the State argued to the jury that defense counsel had lied to and manipulated the jury regarding Taylor’s arrest history. Taylor also argues the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the State’s comments that: (i) Taylor had *690a prior arrest history; and (ii) that “there was certain stuff we can’t go into.” Taylor contends that these errors denied him his right to due process and a fair trial because the State’s argument improperly discussed his arrest history, made an unwarranted personal attack on defense counsel and referred to facts not in evidence, resulting in manifest injustice.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (file nos. 333-05379, 333-27841, 333-47793, 333-62969 and
333-75681) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file nos. 333-70539,
33-82976, 33-95138, 333-93791 and 333-95197) of our report, dated February 19,
1998, with respect to the 1997 financial statements of Ancor Communications,
Incorporated included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                       McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 2000
# C_2012039EN.01001302.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/13

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gebr. Heller Maschinenfabrik v OHIM

(Case T-431/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 39/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gebr. Heller Maschinenfabrik GmbH (Nürtingen, Germany) (represented by: W. Keßler and S. Baur, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner, and subsequently by: R. Pethke, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Manuel Fernández Martinez (Elche, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2007 (Case R 974/2006-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Manuel Fernández Martinez and Gebr. Heller Maschinenfabrik GmbH.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate in the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate in the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4226 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 

non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 

member business loan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. ROYCE (for himself and Mr. HUFFMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan 

secured by a non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling 

from the definition of a member business loan, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Union Residen5 tial Loan Parity Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4226 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF A NON-OWNER OCCUPIED 1- TO 4- 

2 FAMILY DWELLING. 

3 (a) REMOVAL FROM MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN LIMI4 TATION.—Section 107A(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Credit 

5 Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘that is the primary residence of a member’’. 

7 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

8 or the amendment made by this Act shall preclude the 

9 National Credit Union Administration from treating an 

10 extension of credit that is fully secured by a lien on a 1- 

11 to 4-family dwelling that is not the primary residence of 

12 a member as a member business loan for purposes other 

13 than the member business loan limitation requirements 

14 under section 107A of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

15 U.S.C. 1757a). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. Alonzo Antonio MURRELL

233PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 3, 2017

James W. Carter, Attorney at Law, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, Daniel Lawrence Spiegel, Appellate Defender, for Murrell, Alonzo Antonio.

Oliver G. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of September 2017 by Defendant to Expedite Issuance of Mandate:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of October 2017."
# C_2008022EN.01000501.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 November 2007 — Beatriz Salvador García, v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-7/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Condition laid down by Article 4(1)(a), second indent, of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Concept of ‘work done for another State’)

(2008/C 22/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellants: Beatriz Salvador García, (represented by R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, D. Dominguez Peréz, A. Sayagués Torres, abogados)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent, J. Gutierrez Gisbert, J. Rivas and M. Canal, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 Salvador García v Commission (T-205/02), dismissing an action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 27 March 2002 refusing to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the allowances associated therewith

Operative part of the judgment

The Court

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ms Salvador García to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Salvador García to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2003.

1

---
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JUNE 30 , 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76787 James J. Mahone vs. State of Missouri

WD77354 Tyler Toomay vs. State of Missouri

WD77397 Alphonse D. Jackson vs. State of Missouri

WD77486 Fulton Housing Authority vs. Alicia R. Da iley

WD77516 Phillip D. Martin vs. State of Missouri

WD77907 L.C.M. vs. Jerry Wayne Douglas

WD78204 St. Joseph Medical Center vs. John and Leslie Humphrey

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77368 State of Mis s ouri vs. John M. Griffin

WD77415 State of Missouri vs. Jeffery S. Coleman

WD77429 State of Missouri vs. Keith Aaron Lancaster
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Ardmore Municipal Airport, Ardmore, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of land at Ardmore Municipal Airport under the provisions of 
Title 49 United States Code, Section 47153.

DATES: Comment must be received on or before March 1, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Edward N. Agnew, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Arkansas/
Oklahoma Airport Development Office, ASW-630; Forth Worth, Texas 76193-
0630.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mayor Sheryl Ellis, City of Ardmore, at the 
following address: P.O. Box 249, 23 South Washington Street, Ardmore, 
OK 73402.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Donald C. Harris, Senior Program 
Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports 
Development Office, ASW-631, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 
76137-4298.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Ardmore Municipal Airport under the 
provisions of the Act.
    On November 17, 2004, the FAA determined that the request to 
release property at Ardmore Municipal Airport submitted by the city of 
Ardmore met the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in 
part, no later than March 15, 2005.
    The following is a brief overview of the request: The Ardmore 
Airport Development Authority requests the release of 10 (ten) acres of 
airport property. The release of property will allow for industrial 
development projects to proceed. The sale is estimated to provide 
$25,000.00 to be placed toward the purchase of an airport rescue and 
firefighting vehicle.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the 
Ardmore Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 24, 2005.
Rick Marinelli,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 05-1919 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SMC CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF CALCULATION OF AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING


                                                                            Three Months
                                                                               Ended
                                                                           March 31, 1997
                                                                           --------------
<S>                                                                         <C>      
Primary Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of shares                                        6,563,064

   Stock option plan shares to be issued at
   prices ranging from $7.25 to $11.50 per share                              890,000

   Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                               125,000

   Less:  Assumed purchase of shares by the Company
          at the average market price during the period
          using the proceeds received upon the assumed
          exercise of the outstanding options and warrants                 (1,014,037)

          Total Primary Shares                                              6,564,027


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of shares                                        6,563,064

   Stock option plan shares to be issued at prices
   ranging from $7.25 to $11.50 per share                                     890,000

   Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                               125,000

   Less:  Assumed purchase of shares by the Company at
          the higher of ending or average market price during the period
          using the proceeds received upon the assumed exercise of the
          outstanding options
          and warrants                                                     (1,012,742)
                                                                           ----------
          Total Diluted Shares (1)                                          6,565,322
                                                                           ==========

<FN>

(1) Fully diluted EPS was not presented as its effect was less than 3% of
primary earnings per share.
</FN>
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 56418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19222]



[[Page 56418]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-156518-04]
RIN 1545-BE10


Section 411(d)(6) Protected Benefits; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of 
public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice of proposed rulemaking and 
notice of public hearing (REG-156518-04) that was published in the 
Federal Register on Friday, August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47155). The document 
contains regulations relating to the anti-cutback rules of section 
411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, which generally protect accrued 
benefits, early retirement benefits, retirement-type subsidies, and 
optional forms of benefit under qualified retirement plans.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela R. Kinard, (202) 622-6060 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing 
(REG-156518-04) that is the subject of this correction is under section 
411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, REG-156518-04 contains errors that may prove to be 
misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing (REG-156518-04), that was the subject of FR Doc. 05-15960, is 
corrected as follows:
    1. On page 47155, column 2, in the preamble under the caption 
ADDRESSES:, fourth line from the bottom of the paragraph, the language 
156581-04). The public hearing will be'' is corrected to read ``156518-
04). The public hearing will be''.


Sec.  1.411(d)-3  [Corrected]

    2. On page 47159, column 1, Sec.  1.411(d)-3, (a)(4) paragraph (ii) 
Example 4, the last line of the paragraph, the language ``greater of 
the 2.'' is corrected to read, ``greater of the 2 vesting schedules 
(e.g., for G and each other participant in Plan E to be fully vested if 
the participant completes 5 years of service) for those account 
balances and earnings.''.

Cynthia Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 05-19222 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
STATE v. Seid Michael MOSTAFAVI

199A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 20, 2017

Joseph P. Lattimore, Attorney at Law, for Mostafavi, Seid Michael.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of June 2017."
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-8046

IN RE LINDA LYNN WEAVER, DEBTOR

______________________

LINDA LYNN WEAVER,

Plaintiff, Respondent,

v.

HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C., ET AL.,

Defendants, Petitioners.

ERRATA SHEET

The Opinion issued on September 17, 2008 is amended as

follows:

Page 2, Footnote 1, Line 5, add "district court or" before

bankruptcy.

Page 2, Footnote 1, Line 5, to Page 3, Footnote 1 cont'd, Line

1, sections 158(b) and (c) should read "subsection 158(c)".

Page 4, Line 7, add "district courts," before and bankruptcy.
IN RE: S.S.P., A.M.P., Jr., M.L.P., Z.M.P., Z.M.P.

No. COA17-191

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56166-56167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.)

[[Page 56167]]

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable 
statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to 
acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to 
vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and 
nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the 
companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 20, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Jay Bernstein, Bank 
Supervision Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Toronto, Canada, and TD Banknorth 
Inc., Portland, Maine; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Hudson United Bancorp, Mahwah, New Jersey.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 20, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19135 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1603-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1603-DR), dated August 29, 2005, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 21, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Vice Admiral Thad Allen, of the United States Coast Guard is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.

This action terminates my appointment of William Lokey as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 05-19449 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P