alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gerard R. Waldt, Jr., the Interim Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: November 2, 2017 | By:    | /S/ GERARD R. WALDT, JR.

  |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                   |   | Gerard R. Waldt, Jr.             |
|                   |   | Interim Chief Accounting Officer |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P.
(the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q,
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies
with the requirements of that section. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant. /s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:
    Curtis W. MewbourneDate: November 11, 2004 15
STATE of North Carolina v. Manuel Enrique SANTANA, Jr.

No. 121P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

*621Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Santana, Manuel Enrique (Jr.).

Stuart M. Saunders, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of April 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
State of North Carolina v. Dawarifama Prince Fiabema

No. COA16-560

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 17, 2017

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 17/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.017.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 17 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5619 January 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.017.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 17

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5619 January 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 19/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 20/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other | 13 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 19/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 20/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other

13

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AGBAI CIBA AWA AND ALL

OCCUPANTS,

 Appellants,

v.

DFW CAPITAL R.E. PROPERTIES,

INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00141-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# 08-01287-C)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellants have failed to file a brief or respond

to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On August 19, 2008, this Court informed Appellants by letter that their brief was past due

and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The Court advised Appellants that the appeal

would be dismissed unless they responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal

should be continued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. No reply to this Court’s request has been made.

This Court may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when appellant has failed to file

his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1998,

no writ). We have given notice of our intent to dismiss the appeal, have requested a response

whether a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none. We see no

purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceeding. This

Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution, with prejudice. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b), 42.3(c),
and 38.8(a)(1).

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

October 23, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathan Lavon FRIEND.

No. 99P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of October 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Curtis Louis SANGSTER.

No. 84P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Curtis Louis Sangster, for Sangster, Curtis L.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd of March 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
In the MATTER OF: Z.M.S., A.Z.S., Z.L.S., M.J.H.

No. COA17-356

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 7, 2017

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Montier Lopez JACKSON

No. 148P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2017

Montier Jackson, for Jackson, Montier Lopez

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of May 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Jackson, J. recused.
# Official Journal C 85/7 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 487 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 85

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 487 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 085/1 | Conclusions by the Council of 21 February 2005 on Education and Training in the framework of the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy | 1 |
| 2005/C 085/2 | Conclusions by the Council of 21 February 2005 on Youth in the framework of the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy | 5 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 085/3 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| 2005/C 085/4 | List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18(3) of Directive 2001/25/EC on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Situation on 31 December 2004) (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 085/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3773 — Lehman Brothers/Europe Realty/IHG Portfolio) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 19 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 085/1

Conclusions by the Council of 21 February 2005 on Education and Training in the framework of the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy

1

2005/C 085/2

Conclusions by the Council of 21 February 2005 on Youth in the framework of the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy

5

Commission

2005/C 085/3

Euro exchange rates

7

2005/C 085/4

List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18(3) of Directive 2001/25/EC on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Situation on 31 December 2004) (1)

8

2005/C 085/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3773 — Lehman Brothers/Europe Realty/IHG Portfolio) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

19

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 085/6 | Corrigendum to Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘structuring the European Research Area’ (OJ C 63, 15.3.2005) | 20 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 085/6

Corrigendum to Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘structuring the European Research Area’ (OJ C 63, 15.3.2005)

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
COURTNEY NC LLC v. BALDWIN

219P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Monette Baldwin, for Baldwin, Monette.

A. Bartlett White, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephanie D'Atri, Attorney at Law, for Courtney NC, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of September 2017 by Defendant for Sanctions and Leave to Speak:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Beasley, J. and Morgan, J. recused
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997                              
<CASH>                          1,466               
<SECURITIES>                        0           
<RECEIVABLES>                       0           
<ALLOWANCES>                        0           
<INVENTORY>                         0           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,057                             
<PP&E>                        147,767                 
<DEPRECIATION>                  3,674               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                148,150                                
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,898                         
<BONDS>                        49,058                                      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0                         
<PREFERRED>                         0           
<COMMON>                           84                                    
<OTHER-SE>                     68,414                
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  148,150                 
<SALES>                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               17,938                
<CGS>                               0           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               11,479                
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,741              
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,296               
<INCOME-TAX>                        0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,296               
<DISCONTINUED>                      0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0           
<CHANGES>                           0           
<NET-INCOME>                    2,296               
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.61            
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.61              
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Arthur LITTLE

No. 93P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Russell J. Hollers, III, Attorney at Law, Durham, Henry Arthur Little, for Little, Henry A.

David Elliott, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 22nd of March 2017 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order *47was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of March 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
STATE v. Dean Michael VARNER

115PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 23, 2017

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Varner, Dean Michael.

Caroline Farmer, Deputy Director, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 23rd of October 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of October 2017."
# C_2010148EN.01002601.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa)

(Case T-103/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa - Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 148/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Esotrade SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. de Rivera Lamo de Espinosa and J.E. Astiz Suárez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Antonio Segura Sánchez (Alicante, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 (Case R 217/2004-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Antonio Segura Sánchez and Esotrade SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                    FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE BY AND BETWEEN
                        JORANDCOR, INC. ("LANDLORD") AND
                 CODA MUSIC TECHNOLOGY, INC, F/N/A VIVACE, INC.,
                     SUCCESSOR TO CODA COMPANY, ("TENANT"),
                              DATED OCTOBER 23,1992

   THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of the 11th day of December,2001.

         Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated
October 23, 1992, as amended by that First Amendment To Lease dated May 26,
1993, as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated June 30, 1997,
and as amended by that Third Amendment to Lease dated March 22, 2000, for
certain property located in the City of Eden Prairie ("Lease").

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Lease as set forth herein;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements
herein contained, the Lease is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       The name of the Tenant, Coda Music Technology, Inc., f/n/a
Vivace, Inc., successor to Coda Company, has been changed to Net4Music Inc., a
Minnesota corporation. The Tenant hereby represents and warrants that the Tenant
has merely changed its name to NET4Music Inc., but that the Tenant and Net4Music
Inc. are the same entity.

         2.       The Termination Date as defined in the Lease shall be May 31,
2003.

         3.       The monthly base rent to be paid by Tenant to Landlord
pursuant to the terms of the Lease from April 1, 2002 to May 31, 2003 shall be
Seven Thousand Seventy-seven and 38/100 Dollars ($7,077.38) per month (based on
$6.99 per square foot).

         4.       The Landlord will designate a total of forty-eight(48) parking
spaces between the front and rear parking lots for use by the Tenant. In
addition, Landlord will verify that an additional twelve (12) parking spaces
will be available for use by Tenant.

         5.       Except as expressly modified by this Amendment to the Lease,
all the other terms and conditions of the Lease, and any prior amendments
thereto, are hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have placed their hands the date
and year first above written.

LANDLORD:                                    TENANT:

JORANDCOR, INC.                              NET4MUSIC INC

BY: /s/ Richard A. Broms                     By: /s/ Barbara S. Remley
    --------------------                         ---------------------
      Its: President                              Its:    CFO
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Project Software & Development, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79074, 33-79142,
33-95774, 33-95780, and 333-3402) of our report dated November 4, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of Project Software & Development, Inc. as of September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996
and for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 22, 1998
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40965

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE MORENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-97-CR-110-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Enrique Moreno pleaded guilty to count two of an indictment

charging him with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

marijuana. Moreno has raised one issue on appeal--whether the

district court erred in failing to depart to the extent requested

by the Government in its motion for a downward departure. The

argument raised by Moreno was rejected by the court in United

States v. Alvarez, 51 F.3d 36, 38-41 (5th Cir. 1995). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 
No. 

-2-

APPEAL DISMISSED.