alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.06

                                        
                              RED ROOF INNS, INC.
                                        
                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                      FOR
                         ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
                               FORMS 3, 4, AND 5




The undersigned director of Red Roof Inns, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby: (1) constitutes and appoints Francis W. Cash, David L. Rea,
and Alan L. Tallis, collectively and individually, as his agents and
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to (a)
sign and file Form 10-K for Red Roof Inns, Inc. on his behalf and in his name,
place, and stead in any and all capacities with respect to the registration
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), including pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; (b) sign and file any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, and exhibits to Form 10-K; (c) sign and
file any and all applications or other documents to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") covered by the Form 10-K; (d) sign
and file any or all Forms 3, 4, or 5 required to be filed by him with the
Commission under the Act, including pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act; (e)
sign and file any and all amendments to Forms 3, 4, or 5; and (f) do and perform
any and all other acts and deeds whatsoever that may be necessary or required;
and (2) ratifies and approves any and all actions that may be taken pursuant
hereto by any of the above-named agents and attorneys-in-fact or their
substitutes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of the Company has hereunto set his
hand as of the 25th day of February, 1999.



                                                   /s/ Judith A. Rogala
                                                   --------------------
                                                   Judith A. Rogala
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00199

- CR

R OLAND C HRISTOPHER R EED

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 355th District

Court

of Hood County (CR13698)

December 31, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete $45 from

the total costs assessed, and w e likewise modify the bill of costs and the or der to

withdraw funds to delete $45 of the total costs and fines assessed, reducing the total

costs and fines to $10,464

. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is

affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# CE2004070EN.01025201.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/252 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/252

---

(2004/C 70 E/271)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3295/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(7 November 2003)

Subject:   Statute of European Schools

Subject:

Whilst I acknowledge receipt of the Commission's answer to my Parliamentary Question E-2583/03 (1), I should like to ask the Commission what their position is with regard to the following:

1

| 1. | UK teachers in the European Schools who were awarded the threshold prior to appointment, but have not been paid the salary increment by the DfES; |
| --- | --- |

1.

UK teachers in the European Schools who were awarded the threshold prior to appointment, but have not been paid the salary increment by the DfES;

| 2. | UK European School teachers who have been recommended for promotion by their director (head teacher) and consistently refused by the DfES; |
| --- | --- |

2.

UK European School teachers who have been recommended for promotion by their director (head teacher) and consistently refused by the DfES;

| 3. | teachers who have had allowances they were previously paid on their national salary removed by the DfES on appointment to the European Schools. |
| --- | --- |

3.

teachers who have had allowances they were previously paid on their national salary removed by the DfES on appointment to the European Schools.

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(8 December 2003)

(8 December 2003)

The Commission attaches the utmost importance to the respect of all terms of employment by employers and would be concerned about any unfair treatment and discrimination. The Commission is not, however, in a position to have a substantiated view on the hypothetical situations presented by the Honourable Member in the absence of any more specific information. If the Honourable Member has particular cases in mind, he is invited to write to the Commission with details and the relevant accompanying material, so that the cases can be examined by the Commission and, if necessary, appropriate follow-up action be taken. Naturally, personal details of specific individuals would be treated with discretion.

---

(1)  OJ C 65 E, 13.3.2004, p. 180.

1

---
NO. 12-07-00472-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§

IN RE: ADOLFO GIOVANNI TIERI,

RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 13, 2008, this court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for

writ of mandamus filed by Adolfo Giovanni Tieri as relator. That opinion ordered Respondent, the

Honorable Carole W. Clark, Judge of the 321st Judicial District Court, Smith County, Texas, to

vacate her September 25, 2007 order denying Tieri’s motion to dismiss and for costs under the

UCCJEA and to issue an order granting the motion, dismissing the suit affecting the parent-child

relationship, and relinquishing jurisdiction under the UCCJEA to the State of New Jersey. On

October 20, 2008, Respondent complied with this court’s opinion and order. 

All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus

proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this

original proceeding is dismissed.

 JAMES T. WORTHEN 

 Chief Justice

Opinion delivered October 22, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
NNN DURHAM OFFICE PORTFOLIO 1, LLC; James Osmond; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 2, LLC; James Sun Yu Lam; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 3, LLC; Gary F. Turtle; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 4, LLC; Sherry L. Turtle; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 5, LLC; Gregory R. Maloney; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 6, LLC; Sharon I. Maloney; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 7, LLC; Ray Miller, Trustee; Patricia M. Miller, Trustee; NNN Durham Office PortfoLIO 9, LLC; PCL Property, LLC; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 10, LLC; Frances H. Keiffer, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 11, LLC; Frank A. Norman, Jr.; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 12, LLC; St. Kitts Investments, LLC; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 13, LLC; Fannie B. Blackwelder; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 14, LLC; Barbara L. Davidson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 15, LLC; Frederick J. Hornbacher, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 16, LLC; Roberta Macgregor Masson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 17, LLC; William B. Wachter II, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 18, LLC; Susan B. Wachter, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 19, LLC; Pell/Cruz Investments, Inc. ; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 20, LLC; Jack R. Brown; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 21, LLC; Patricia A. Brown ; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 22, LLC; Jack D. Laflesch, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 24, LLC; Muriel Sample, Successor Trustee; James K. Merrill, Successor Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 26, LLC; C.G.B.M.T. Enterprises, Inc.; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 27, LLC; Susan E. Wagner; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 28, LLC; Frederic J. Van Dis; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 29, LLC; Lawrence A. Wattson, Trustee; Stephanie T. Wattson, Trustee; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 30, LLC; Darrin A. Smith; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 32, LLC; Kenneth Deno McLamb; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 33, LLC; Cynthia L. McLamb; NNN Durham Office Portfolio 34, LLC; Mark B. Pista; and Carol E. Pista v. GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY; Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC; Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc. ; NNN Durham Office Portfolio, LLC ; and NNN Realty Advisors, Inc.

No. 218P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2017

Charles E. Raynal, IV, Attorney at Law, Jamie S. Schwedler, Attorney at Law, Catherine R.L. Lawson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Grubb & Ellis Company, et al.

John L. Sarratt, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC, et al.

Thomas H. Stark, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, J. Anthony Penry, Attorney at Law, Seth Allen Neyhart, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed by Defendants on the 17th of July 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2008 – FVB v OHIM – FVD (FVB)**

**(Case T-10/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark FVB – Earlier national word mark FVD – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 51-57)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2006 (Case R 1343/2005-4), relating to opposition proceedings between FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vorsorgemanagement Deutschland mbH and FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark FVB for services in Classes 35 and 36 – Application No 2126175 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vermögensberatung Deutschland mbH (formerly FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vorsorgemanagement Deutschland mbH) |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National word mark FVD for services in Class 36. |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld; partial rejection of the application for registration |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 04-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2009



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zvi Fried, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|March 31, 2009 |  | /S/ Zvi Fried
Zvi FriedChief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 3, 2005 from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, March 3, 2005, from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include: Various IRS issues. 

Martha Curry, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 05-1948 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 12  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST / LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Amounts in thousands except ratio amounts)
 Year ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Earnings before fixed charges:Income before allocation of minority interest and income from
investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries (1)
    
    $
    153,324
    
    
    $
    166,349
    
    
    $
    219,259
    
    
    $
    144,126
    
    
    $
    139,538Add: Interest expense
    
    
    125,138
    
    
    
    107,545
    
    
    
    106,950
    
    
    
    94,836
    
    
    
    94,793Depreciation expense on capd interest
    
    
    5,393
    
    
    
    4,437
    
    
    
    3,829
    
    
    
    3,442
    
    
    
    3,140Amortization of deferred financing costs
    
    
    4,163
    
    
    
    3,969
    
    
    
    4,045
    
    
    
    3,551
    
    
    
    3,307Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    288,018
    
    
    $
    282,300
    
    
    $
    334,083
    
    
    $
    245,955
    
    
    $
    240,778Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    125,138
    
    
    $
    107,545
    
    
    $
    106,950
    
    
    $
    94,836
    
    
    $
    94,793Amortization of deferred financing charges
    
    
    4,163
    
    
    
    3,969
    
    
    
    4,045
    
    
    
    3,979
    
    
    
    4,015Capitalized interest
    
    
    45,697
    
    
    
    30,837
    
    
    
    17,748
    
    
    
    13,242
    
    
    
    10,947Fixed charges
    
    
    174,998
    
    
    
    142,351
    
    
    
    128,743
    
    
    
    112,057
    
    
    
    109,755Preferred unit distributions
    
    
    17,126
    
    
    
    13,691
    
    
    
    12,095
    
    
    
    11,844
    
    
    
    12,416Combined fixed charges
    
    $
    192,124
    
    
    $
    156,042
    
    
    $
    140,838
    
    
    $
    123,901
    
    
    $
    122,171Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.65
    
    
    
    1.98
    
    
    
    2.59
    
    
    
    2.19
    
    
    
    2.19Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    
    
    1.50
    
    
    
    1.81
    
    
    
    2.37
    
    
    
    1.99
    
    
    
    1.97
 
 (1)
    
    Amounts for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been reclassified to present properties that have been
sold during 2007. As a result, operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations from continuing operations for all periods presented.
127018(89(91)

DIANE CAMERON and JAMES CAMERON, Co-Guardians of the Estate of Daniel Cameron, Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 127018
v CoA: 248315

AUTO CLUB INSURANCE Wayne CC: 02-000549-NF
ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________

On order of the Chief Justice, mo tions by the Michigan Department of Community Health and the Michigan Trial Lawy ers Association for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are considered and they are GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the accompanying Report of Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William O’Dowd IV, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 22, 2011
By:
/s/ William O’Dowd IVWilliam O’Dowd IVChief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 15
          - [ET Docket No. 04-37; ET Docket No. 03-104; FCC 04-245]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; announcement of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission adopted new requirements and measurement guidelines for a new type of carrier current system that provides access to broadband services using electric utility companies over power lines. Certain rules contained new information collection requirements and were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 7, 2005. This document announces the effective date of these published rules.                    

# DATES:

The amendments to §§ 15.615(a) through (e) published at 70 FR 1360, January 7, 2005, became effective on July 22, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy J. Brooks, Office of Engineering and Technology, Policy and Rules Division, (202) 418-2454.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On July 22, 2005, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection requirements contained in Sections 15.615(a) through (e) pursuant to OMB Control No. 3060-1087. Accordingly, the information collection requirements contained in these rules became effective on February 7, 2005.

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 15

      - Communications equipment
      - Radio

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-19515 Filed 9-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P