alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MMC 06.30.2014 10Q Ex_10.3

















Exhibit 10.3


June 6, 2014


J. Michael Bischoff
[Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]


Subject:    Terms of Employment




Dear Mike:


This amendment to the Letter Agreement, dated November 21, 2013, between you and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “2013 Letter Agreement”) revises the terms and conditions of your employment by Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.  The 2013 Letter Agreement will continue to govern your employment, except as specified below, effective as of May 14, 2014:


		
	1.
	Exhibit A to the 2013 Letter Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the attached Exhibit A.




Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter agreement by signing and dating below and the enclosed copy and returning one executed document to me on or before June 20, 2014.


Sincerely,




/s/ Daniel S. Glaser
Daniel S. Glaser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.






Accepted and Agreed:




/s/ J. Michael Bischoff            
(Signature)        




June 9, 2014                
(Date)













June 6, 2014
J. Michael Bischoff
Page 2




Exhibit A




 
	
		
	Annual Base Salary
	$750,000 (effective April 1, 2014)

	Annual Target Bonus Opportunity
	Bonus awards are discretionary.  Anticipated target bonus of $1,250,000 commencing with the 2013 performance year (awarded in 2014).  Actual bonus may range from 0% - 200% of target, based on achievement of individual performance objectives, and/or Marsh & McLennan Companies’ performance as Marsh & McLennan Companies may establish from time to time.

	Annual Target Long Term Incentive Opportunity
	Long-term incentive awards are discretionary.  Anticipated target grant date fair value of $1,000,000, commencing with the award made in 2015.
EXHIBIT 32





CLEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Power Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Diane Glatfelter, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 20,  2010
By:
/s/Diane GlatfelterName:
Diane GlatfelterTitle:
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
# C_2023104EN.01004101.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/41

---

Action brought on 3 February 2023 — Häcker Küchen v EUIPO — Moura & Moura (MH Cuisines)

(Case T-42/23)

(2023/C 104/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Häcker Küchen GmbH & Co. KG (Rödinghausen, Germany) (represented by: F. Dehn, L. Maritzen, C. Krafft and K. Blükle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Moura & Moura Fabricação e Comercialização de Mobiliário Lda (Sanfins de Ferreira, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark MH Cuisines — Application No 18 233 301

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2022 in Case R 1078/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the defendant’s opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the defendant’s opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the earlier appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the earlier appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Official Journal L 199/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 199 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5031 July 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 199

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5031 July 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 311/76 on the compilation of statistics on foreign workers (1) | 23 |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a mechanism for the creation of Rapid Border Intervention Teams and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 as regards that mechanism and regulating the tasks and powers of guest officers | 30 |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) | 40 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure

1

*

Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 311/76 on the compilation of statistics on foreign workers (1)

23

*

Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a mechanism for the creation of Rapid Border Intervention Teams and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 as regards that mechanism and regulating the tasks and powers of guest officers

30

*

Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II)

40

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
WILKIE v. CITY OF BOILING SPRING LAKES

44PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2017

James P. Cauley, III, Attorney at Law, Wilson, David M. Rief, Attorney at Law, Geneva L. Yourse, Attorney at Law, Cary, Jack Cozort, Attorney at Law, for City of Boiling Spring Lakes.

Kurt Blaine Fryar, Attorney at Law, for Wilkie, Edward F., et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of May 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of May 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 5th day of July 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# C_2008209EN.01005101.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/51

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2008 — Ashoka v OHIM (DREAM IT, DO IT!)

(Case T-186/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark DREAM IT, DO IT! - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 209/89)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ashoka, (Arlington, Virginia, United States of America), represented by: A. Link and A. Jaeger-Lenz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 March 2007 (Case R 635/2006-1) concerning the registration of the word mark DREAM IT, DO IT! as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ashoka to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ashoka to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit No. 01-2011 JAN SWALLOW, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. FETZER VINEYARDS, BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, and

WILLIAM CASCIO, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on September 3, 2002, is amended as follows: Page 19, last line: Replace "Casio" with "Cascio".
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ FRED M. POWELLFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.9(h)****EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 9th day of April, 2008to that certain EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of December 21, 1999, as heretofore amended(collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between R. NEAL BLACK (“Employee”) and JOS. A.BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are herebyacknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, herebyamend the Employment Agreement as follows:1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the lastday of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2010.2. Effective May 4, 2008, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $575,000.Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendmentand the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shallcontrol and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respectivemeanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed apart of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. The terms of employment set forth in thisAmendment have been approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of theEmployer.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first abovewritten.         JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.               By: /s/ Charles D. Frazer   /s/ R. Neal Black             Charles D. Frazer,    R. NEAL BLACK    Senior Vice President-General Counsel
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20047

Summary Calendar

JEFFRY PENDER

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BARRON BUILDERS & MANAGEMENT CO

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CV-01635

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Our jurisdiction on appeal is limited to the district court’s denial of

plaintiff-appellant’s second post-judgment motion. Pender v. Barron Builders,

Order, No. 08-20047 (May 28, 2008). The district court granted the defendant’s

motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims for failure to abide by the court’s rules and

for want of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). The plaintiff filed an initial

motion for reconsideration and relief from judgment pursuantto Rules 59(e) and

60. After the district court denied his motion, the plaintiff filed a second motion

for reconsideration. The district court then denied the plaintiff’s second motion

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 24, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
2

for reconsideration. We now review this denial of plaintiff’s second motion for

reconsideration. 

We review the denial of plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration under

an abuse of discretion standard. LeClerc v. Webb, 419 F.3d 405, 412 n.13 (5th

Cir. 2005). “A motion to alter or amend judgment must clearly establish either

a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence. These

motions cannot be used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been

made before the judgmentissued. Moreover, they cannot be used to argue a case

under a new legal theory. A district court abuses its discretion if it bases its

decision on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment

of the evidence.” Ross v. Marshall, 426 F.3d 745, 763 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal

quotations and citations omitted). The plaintiff did not present any newly

discovered evidence with his second motion for reconsideration. The district

court dismissed plaintiff’s claims for want of prosecution and failure to abide by

court rules based on several instances of plaintiff’s discovery abuse and noncompliance with court orders. The plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration

does not clearly establish any manifest error of law in respect to the district

court’s determination. We therefore cannot conclude that the district court’s

second denial of plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration was an abuse of its

discretion. 

For the foregoing reasons, the district court judgment is

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7053

ANTHONY R. TAYLOR, a/k/a Tony Red, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District 

Judge. (6:07-cv-01814-HMH) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Anthony R. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Anthony R. Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition 

and his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. 

2 
3 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 274/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.274.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 274 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5213 November 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.274.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 274

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5213 November 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 274/01 | Final accounts for the financial year 2008 of the seventh, eighth, nineth and tenth European Development Funds | 1 |
| 2009/C 274/02 | Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2008 | 235 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 274/01

Final accounts for the financial year 2008 of the seventh, eighth, nineth and tenth European Development Funds

1

2009/C 274/02

Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2008

235

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Judith BARBEE and Thomas Barbee, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Lauren Barbee, Plaintiffs, v. WHAP, P.A. and Lyndhurst Gynecologic Associates, P.A., Defendants.

No. COA16-1154

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 15, 2017

AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     We have  issued  our  report  dated  January  23,  2004,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements  incorporated by reference or included in the
Annual Report of TF Financial  Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year  ended  December  31,  2003.  We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by
reference  of  said  report  in  the  Registration  Statements  of TF  Financial
Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-87176,  effective December
7, 1994,  File No.  333-09235,  effective July 31, 1996 and File No.  333-27085,
effective May 14, 1997).




/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2004
FORM 40-F CERTIFICATION

I,  Cliff T. Davis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 40-F of  Nevsun Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e

)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f

)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

/s/  Cliff T. Davis

Signature

April  4, 2008

Date

Chief Financial Officer

Title