alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TOWN OF BEECH MOUNTAIN v. GENESIS WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, INC.

230A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 2016

Mr. Patrick H. Flanagan, Ms. Meagan I. Kiser, Mr. Stacy C. Eggers, IV, Ms. Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorneys at Law, For Town of Beech Mountain.

Mr. Charles E. Clement, Mr. Charles A. Brady, III, Mr. John J. Korzen, Attorneys at Law, For Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.

Mr. William J. Brian, Jr., Attorney at Law, For Pacific Legal Foundation

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of October 2016 by Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

*251"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of October 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zvi Fried, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/S/ Zvi FriedZvi FriedMarch 24, 2010

Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the MATTER OF: P.D. and C.A.

No. COA16-1317

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 1, 2017

VACATED.
# Official Journal C 370A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.370.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5530 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.370.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5530 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
| 2012/C 370A/01 | Vacancy notice for a Director (m/f) (Cedefop/2012/08/AD) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

2012/C 370A/01

Vacancy notice for a Director (m/f) (Cedefop/2012/08/AD)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |
| 281 | (MT) |
| 283 | (SV) |
| 285 | (ES) |
| 288 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | (HU) |
| 294 | (BG) |
| 296 | (BG) |
| 300 | |
| 302 | |
| 304 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 305 | |
| 307 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 314 | |
| 316 | |
| 324 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 339 | |
| 340 | (LT) |
| 349 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 352 | |
| 368 | |
| 369 | (EN/FR) |
| 370 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

281

(MT)

283

(SV)

285

(ES)

288

(DE/EN/FR)

290

291

292

(HU)

294

(BG)

296

(BG)

300

302

304

(DE/EN/FR)

305

307

(DE/EN/FR)

314

316

324

(DE/EN/FR)

339

340

(LT)

349

(DE/EN/FR)

352

368

369

(EN/FR)

370

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 70/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.070.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 70 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 558 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.070.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 70

English edition

Legislation

Volume 558 March 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/134/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass
  (notified under document C(2012) 865)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2012/135/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for iron and steel production
  (notified under document C(2012) 903)

   (1) | 63 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/134/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass
  (notified under document C(2012) 865)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 865)

1

2012/135/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for iron and steel production
  (notified under document C(2012) 903)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 903)

63

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP Solar Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sass Peress,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sass PeressSass Peress 
Principal Accounting Officer
June 15, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136769 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136769 

 COA: 283136 

Kent CC: 06-007815-FH 

JAMES VERNON DIXON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

p1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2012258EN.01001501.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Frontex

(Case T-476/07) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Frontex tendering procedures - Provision of informatics services - Rejection of a tender - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Award criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability)

2012/C 258/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (represented by: S. Vuorensola, acting as Agent, and J. Stuyck and A. M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of Frontex’s decision rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in response to the call for tenders Frontex/OP/47/2007 for the provision of ‘informatics services, hardware, and software licences’ (OJ 2007/S 114-139890) and of the decision to award the contract to a different tenderer and, secondly, a claim for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex), including those reserved by the order of the General Court of 28 October 2008. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex), including those reserved by the order of the General Court of 28 October 2008.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Cornelius Delane BENTON

No. COA16-1238

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

DISMISSED.
STATE v. Darrell Lee MELTON

253PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2017

*581Matthew Thomas Tulchin, Assistant Attorney General, Greg Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandeBerg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Melton, Darrell Lee.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 13th of December 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 5th day of February 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Stanley DAYE, Defendant.

No. COA16-74.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Reserve System


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, February 7, 2005.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of 
Board Members; 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 28, 
2005.
Robert dev. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-1958 Filed 1-28-05; 2:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
In the Matter of: L.M.C., T.J.C.

No. COA16-661

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
**Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 January 2010 – Goncharov v OHIM – DSB (DSBW)**

**(Case T-34/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark DSBW – Earlier Community word mark DSB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 29, 52-54)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2006 (Case R 1330/2005-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DSB and Mr K. Goncharov. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Karen Goncharov |
| Community trade mark sought: | The word mark DSBW for services in Classes 39, 41, 43 and 44 – Application No 2 852 143 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | DSB |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | The word mark DSB (Community trade mark No 2292290) for services in Classes 35 to 37, 39, 41 and 42, the opposition being directed against registration in Classes 39, 41 and 43 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Annulment of the contested decision and appeal allowed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Karen Goncharov to pay the costs. |
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-459-CR

JOHN TIMOTHY BEGELTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant John Timothy Begelton entered an open plea of guilty to

murder. The trial court assessed his punishment at thirty-five years’

confinement. 

Begelton’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and
2... 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

2

motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds for relief. Begelton was given the opportunity to file a pro se brief, but

he did not do so.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of

the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the

appeal is frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth

1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). Because

Begelton entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for potential

error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of Begelton’s

plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and

error occurring after entry of the guilty plea. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d

615, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 666–67

(Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree

with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find
3

nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v.

State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); accord Meza v.

State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 16, 2008
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-31287) and Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-96624, 333-48597,
333-52927 and 333-51884) of our report dated March 16, 2001 (except for Note 2,
as to which the date is August 20, 2001), with respect to the financial
statements of Net4Music Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended December 31, 2000.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 20, 2001
STATE of North Carolina v. Felix Ricardo SALDIERNA

No. 271PA15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2017

Mr. W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, For Saldierna, Felix.

Ms. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd of August 2017 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of August 2017 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3237-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-3237-EM), dated September 10, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

September 18, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael Bolch, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency. 

This action terminates my appointment of Ron Sherman as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-19106 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P