alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Steven WRIGHT, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 82106.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 2, 2003.

Mary S. Choi, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

*688Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Wright [Movant] appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

A jury convicted Movant of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo.1994. The trial court found Movant to be a prior and persistent offender, subject to an extended term of imprisonment, and sentenced Mov-ant to twenty years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Movant appealed his conviction and sentence and this Court affirmed. *State v. Wright,*62 S.W.3d 571 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). Movant thereafter timely filed his pro se and amended motions alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel (Counsel), pursuant to Rule 29.15. This appeal follows the denial of Movant’s motion after an eviden-tiary hearing.

In his sole point on appeal, Movant alleges the motion court’s denial of relief was clearly erroneous because Counsel was ineffective, and but for this ineffectiveness, the outcome of his trial would have been different. Movant specifically argues that Counsel failed to exercise a reasonable trial strategy by revealing Movant’s arrest for murder to the jurors and this revelation prejudiced Movant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this ease would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of North Carolina v. Stephen David BROWN

No. COA16-1044

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MCLEODUSA INCORPORATED
                             AS OF MARCH 17, 2000

Corporation                                               State of Incorporation
-----------                                               ----------------------
McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc.               Iowa
McLeodUSA Network Services, Inc.                          Iowa
McLeodUSA Integrated Business Systems, Inc.               Iowa
NewCom Companies, Inc.                                    Iowa
QST Communications Inc.                                   Illinois
Consolidated Communication Inc.                           Delaware
Consolidated Communications Operator Services Inc.        Illinois
Consolidated Communications Public Services Inc.          Illinois
Consolidated Communications Directories, Inc.             Illinois
Greene County Partners, Inc.                              Illinois
Consolidated Market Response Inc.                         Illinois
Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company                   Illinois
Consolidated Communications Systems & Services Inc.       Illinois
McLeodUSA Media Group, Inc.                               Iowa
McLeodUSA Publishing Company                              Iowa
Frontier Directory Company of Nebraska, Inc.              Nebraska
J-Mar Publishing Company, Inc.                            Michigan
Fronteer Directory Co. of Minnesota                       Minnesota
Info America Phone Books, Inc.                            Michigan
Talking Directories, Inc.                                 Michigan
McLeodUSA Diversified, Inc.                               Iowa
Ruffalo, Cody & Associates, Inc.                          Iowa
Campus-Call, Inc.                                         Iowa
Ovation Communications, Inc.                              Delaware
Ovation Communications International, Inc.                Delaware
Ovation Communications of Illinois, Inc.                  Delaware
Ovation Communications of Minnesota, Inc.                 Minnesota
McLeodUSA Communications of Wisconsin, Inc.               Delaware
BRE Communications, L.L.C.                                Delaware
Dakota Telecommunications Group, Inc.                     Delaware
DTG Community Telephone, Inc.                             South Dakota
Dakota Telecom, Inc.                                      South Dakota
DTG Internet, Inc.                                        South Dakota
DTG Communications, Inc.                                  South Dakota
DTG DataNet, Inc.                                         South Dakota
Dakota Telecommunications Systems, Inc.                   South Dakota
Dakota Wireless Systems, Inc.                             South Dakota
Telecom Park L.L.C.                                       South Dakota
Access Communications Holding, Inc.                       Delaware
Access Communications, Inc.                               Utah
S.J. Investments, Inc.                                    Utah
One Stop Telecommunications, Inc.                         Illinois
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 751-TA-28-29]


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp and Prawns From India and 
Thailand

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 16, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim McClure (202-205-3191), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these investigations may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5, 2005, the Commission published 
notice (70 FR 23884) of its institution of and schedule for 
investigations to be conducted pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)) (the Act) to review its determinations 
in investigation Nos. 731-TA-1066-1067 (Final). In that notice, the 
Commission found good cause existed to waive rule 207.45(c), concerning 
the time for completion of changed circumstances review investigations, 
and established a completion deadline of October 31, 2005. The 
Commission has now found that good cause exists to extend further the 
completion date for these review investigations, and has set a deadline 
for completion of these reviews of November 21, 2005.
    The Commission's new schedule for the investigations is as follows: 
The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is October 5, 2005; the 
Commission will make its final release of information on October 25, 
2005; and final party comments are due on October 28, 2005.
    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 16, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18989 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
COURTNEY NC LLC v. BALDWIN

219P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 7, 2017

Monette Baldwin, for Baldwin, Monette.

A Bartlett White, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Stephanie D'Atri, Attorney at Law, for Courtney NC, LLC

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of July 2017 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of July 2017."

Beasley, J. recused
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of ADESA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cameron C. Hitchcock,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18USC 1350), that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| /s/  CAMERON C.  HITCHCOCK |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|

Cameron C. Hitchcock*Chief Financial Officer*May 10, 2006

*This certification accompanies the Report pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.*

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136269 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136269 

 COA: 282453 

Wayne CC: 88-011275-FC

DWIGHT HASSAD RASHAD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Gao, Chief Executive Officer of BMP Sunstone Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID GAO                                     
|David Gao Chief Executive
Officer November 9, 2010
VAUGHAN v. MASHBURN, et al.

42PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2017

Patricia P. Shields, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Travis E. Collum, Attorney at Law, Mooresville, Kevin M. Duffan, Attorney at Law, Joshua D. Neighbors, Attorney at Law, Richard N. Shapiro, Attorney at Law, for Vaughan, Maria.

Harold Holmes, Attorney at Law, Bradley K. Overcash, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, John D. Branson, Attorney at Law, for Mashburn, Lindsay (M.D.), et al.

Daniel Hardison Wood, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of April 2017 by NC Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of April 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Tidwell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: June 12, 201  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. John Frede SABBAGHRABAIOTTI

No. 291P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Sabbaghrabaiotti, John Frede.

*695Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of August 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 8th of August 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of August 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
STATE v. Eric Glenn LANE

606A05-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Lane, Eric Glenn.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Nicholaos Vlahos, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of March 2017 by State of NC:

*20"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 21st day of April 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
In the MATTER OF: A.G.

No. COA16-1200

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 16, 2017

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Douglas P. Teitelbaum, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-Q of BH/RE, L.L.C.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: August 4, 2004
    
    /s/ Douglas P. TeitelbaumDouglas P. TeitelbaumManager
State of North Carolina ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau

In the Matter of the Filing Dated January 3, 2014 by the North Carolina Rate Bureau for Revised Homeowners' Insurance Rates & Homeowners' Insurance Territory Definitions

No. 333P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. R. Michael Strickland, Mr. Marvin M. Spivey, Jr., Mr. Glenn C. Raynor, Attorneys *525at Law, For The North Carolina Rate Bureau.

Mr. William M. Trott, Attorney at Law.

Ms. Sherri L. Hubbard, Attorney at Law, Ms. Patricia Ford, For North Carolina Department Of Insurance.

Mr. Robert Devane Croom, IV, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Jonathan L. Crook, Attorney at Law.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by N.C. Rate Bureau on the 6th of September 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of September 2016 by N.C. Rate Bureau in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Logica Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Enzo
Taddei as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 14, 2007





/s/ Enzo Taddei
--------------------------------
Name: Enzo Taddei
Chief Financial Officer





                                     - 22 -
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

 

The undersigned, Thomas JFitzmyers and Michael J. Herbert, being the duly elected and acting ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of SimpsonManufacturing Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifythat the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | February 27,  2009 |                   | /s/Thomas J  Fitzmyers |
|--------|--------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
|   |               | Thomas J  Fitzmyers    |
|   |               |                   |
|   |               |                   |
|   |               | /s/Michael J.  Herbert |
|   |               | Michael J.  Herbert    |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350has been provided to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and will be retained bySimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff on request.*

 

----